A 'feminist' perspective on TRP

aznredpill · 2016-07-24T22:37:25+00:00

Okay, I'll bite.

What are your thoughts about the dualistic mating strategy of females where it's inherently screwing over the bottom 80%'s ability to produce offspring in a secure family environment in today's world?

DontBeFredo · 2016-07-24T22:04:34+00:00

I went back and read your posts and therefore have some things to say about your philosophy.

In an older post you write that women truly want "unconditional love and learning experiences". After that I stopped taking you seriously. Why? Nothing in life is unconditional. Just because you are a woman and have a vagina does not entitle you to unconditional love. You are not magic, nor special, nor deserving of anything simply because you are a woman. Moreover, what do you define as love? Because there are plenty of pathetic men who would willingly give their left nut to be with you if it is love that you are after. Unfortunately, when you say love you are using that term to umbrella a whole lot of other things: support, both emotionally and physically, children, experiences, etc etc. These things inevitably cost a lot of $ and effort - and you believe that you deserve them unconditionally? How about go fucking yourself. Also, learning experiences? Do you suppose those are free? Because a lot of women equate "learning experiences" with traveling, vacations, experimentation....oh shit, all those things also cost money!

So sure, if every woman wants to go out and earn every bit the man does, and risk every bit the man does in a marriage, feel free to preach your ideals. But whatever fantasy you live in, and whatever soft, fluffy words you want to use, like "unconditional love" and "learning experiences"...that shit doesn't fly in reality.

The fault with your logic is that you demand unquantifiable, intangible traits from men, which cost quantifiable and tangible things like money and time, in exchange for equality. And throughout the course of time these intangible traits - like "unconditional love" seem to shift meanings and expectations. You and all the other feminists don't want absolute equality. You want ideology driven equality while the emotional and financial tolls of life greatly fall on the side of the woman, and bury the man in the real world.

Apexk9 · 2016-07-24T22:18:20+00:00

I live for me the rest of you can go fuck yourselves.

raisins3142 · 2016-07-24T22:37:31+00:00

Feminism likes to point to its dictionary definition, but the way it is invoked or the thoughts of its adherents hasn't been that for a very long time.

Feminism is now a female special interest lobbying endeavor, among other things. But keep pointing to that definition.

herpes_delivery_man · 2016-07-24T23:54:45+00:00

reported. Mods delete this shit post

HeatseekingLogicBomb · 2016-07-25T00:30:48+00:00

and people of all genders

There are only two genders. Trans are still one or another, regardless of if you choose to label them based on chromosomes or how they want to be perceived. It's male to female, or female to male. It's not a mysterious third gender.

It is the praise of money by both sexes.

The illusion that we own anything at all,

Money is simply a tool, in concept. Even if it's current state is not ideal, people focusing on money is just how life works. It's a competition. We live in a world of finite resources. We aren't going to end up with some hunky dory Communist utopia. Communism has never worked and never will work.

If you want to say no one can own anything legitimately you're trying to dissolve the entire basis for conflict resolution in society. Again, you're insinuating Communism is the answer. Maybe you don't mean to, but you are. Believing we can't own anything is derived from a worldview based on existential solipsism. There's a whole can of worms here about politics, economics and philosophy as it relates to those that I don't care to go into, because that isn't what this sub is about specifically. They get referenced but it's not the focus. We could argue that certain concepts have been corrupted or abused; money, ownership of commodities, industry, etc. but to say everything belongs to the Earth and therefore no property rights are valid is fundamentally misunderstanding how humans organize so they don't just end up killing each other constantly so only the strongest wins.

BigAjax · 2016-07-24T23:38:08+00:00

Jesus, this is ponderous. Can't believe it's taken this long: tits or GTFO

Title	A 'feminist' perspective on TRP
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	0
Comments	25
Date	July 24, 2016 9:40 PM UTC (10 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/4uf7go/a_feminist_perspective_on_trp/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/a-feminist-perspective-on-trp.61011 https://theredarchive.com/post/61011

Comments