I thought I ought to make a post on this topic because it is the push-back you receive from everyone in resistance of truth. This statement is at the core of all resistance. It is the view of the world in the subjective as appose to the objective. There are many people who will say that it is impossible to view the world from the objective point of view. To that I agree, everyone has their own lens of the world shaped by their own disposition. There is however ways to focus that lens to the absolute truth, and I'll get into that later.

The problem people have with objective reality is that it makes points that can be applied as blanket statements due to its absolute origin. When we say something like AWALT, we make a statement from an absolute frame which is to say we are looking at the primal reference. We have stripped away conditions of society and circumstance to make a judgments. These blanket statements are on the whole true, but not complete without an asterisk. I can give you a few examples.

  • “Everyone will eat when they are hungry”*,
  • “Men are attracted to women”** ,
  • “A health human diet requires proteins only found in meat and animal products”***,
  • “All Men act in a polygamous fashion when approaching sex”****,
  • “All females act in a hypergamous fashion when approaching sex.”*****

Each one of these statements is true in a vacuum, however I can refute each one of these statements when we apply the interaction of environmental factors. In truth the only truth paramount to the ones I stated is the most primal reference, which is the need to survival. Each of the other truths mentioned bends to the truth of survival and thus renders each of them false. It is because of the need to survive that the environment is allowed to sully the other truths. As with all the truths stated, there are environmental factors that make them false and disputable as blanket statements.

*People will not eat when hungry, if the hunger can be prolonged without death and avoid loss of social status which may result in lower chance of survival. Example: Table manner, the aversion to stealing in hunger, calorie restricted diets, diets designed to lose weight and ultimately look good.

**Men’s attraction to women is contingent on 2 primal needs, the paramount survival need and the second most primal need of procreation. When the paramount need of survival is not met or becomes exceedingly precarious, the second most primal need is abandoned. This is the case of homosexuality which provides several advantages in survival due to politically correct culture and legal situations. At times if one is so inclined or able, the need for procreation may yet be satisfied by the culturally/legally correct actions, which are surrogate mothers, and “heterosexual indiscretions” (which is ironic because it is easier to obtain heterosexual sex for gay men). Both of these are achievable without loss of the survival advantage of homosexuality. All of which may be consciously ignored by the one experiencing it due to the survival advantage of unawareness in this issue.

***I don’t recall where I read this information, but there are many amino acids only available in meat, and for a health vegetarian/vegan diet, one must consume those amino acids from supplements, which ironically must be made from animal products. Either way the existence of these supplements as available in the environment make the statement false in this relative frame. Also note, just like in the men’s attraction to women example, there may also be perceived benefits to survival due to cultural fitness within a niche. For example in India consumption of meat is a sign of lower social status, also note locations like Portland, Seattle, The Bay area and Brooklyn. (That was a little joke)

****This truth is once again contingent on survival and culture. I can go on and on and ramble about why polygamy is not favored and why it is difficult to create a polygamous society (Even though we are trying, since polygamy depends on Alphas Fuck, Betas Buck). Ultimately to the lament of feminists (unattractive women) and to people who have attained truly Alpha status (which despite our posturing we as collective at TRP have not); the betas have won and basically “aren’t going to take it”. This is due to the fact that you can only push a man so far against his own will to survive and procreate. This creates the cultural basis for monogamy and the driving force for monogamy that we seem compelled to adhere to.

*****This has been discussed to exhaustion in TRP and is basically the real meaning of AWALT. Women are ultimately monogamous in our culture for the same reason men are monogamous. The betas have “won”, and any push towards hypergamy is the same push we have for polygamy (people who have mastered TRP start wondering why bother with single LTR when plates are available). This is also the reason why America, has “decayed”; the betas are losing in America (ironically they are hurting themselves with “you go girl”isms) and in other places women act more monogamous. It is the reason why Eddie Murphy’s Bush Bitch bit is accurate and mail order brides don’t work, because our culture is beginning to make survival and procreation easier in a hypergamous/polygamous fashion and making this truth truer.

While I’m sure all the truths explained may have been helpful in it of themselves, the real point of this post is that objective truth can be grasped when you look at the more paramount and primal truth of survival. Any attempt to disclaim some of the less primal truths like the ones mentioned require reference to the truth of survival in some way. Forming your understanding around this truth will result in an understanding that is most rooted in reality.

Finally it is true that everything cannot be known, but that doesn’t mean nothing can be known.

If there is enough interest in this post I think I have an equally fascinating idea about obscuring value which further explains why people subscribe to “Noting can really be known”

Lastly, I have been toying with this idea of “Will to Grow” in my mind and sort of toying with it as possibly even more paramount than survival. If anyone is so inclined please let me know what you think: http://youtu.be/wRz8l-Ojs70?t=5m50s