Experimental Rating System

MrTyler_Durden · 2017-03-01T07:57:04+00:00

I think putting female behavior into math equations is dumb. For all we know we could wake up tomorrow and all women suddenly love ugly guys because they've been loving hot guys since the beginning of time and it's time to change things up because what a girl likes today won't be what she likes tomorrow.

serael · 2017-03-01T10:02:06+00:00

Are we really creating weighted average functions for the 10 scale in this thread? Jesus fuck you guys are just bad.

You cannot quantify the qualitative. Fuck score keeping. Be a man. Do you want to fuck her? Play game and fuck her and leave the functions for work. It's a binary equation: yes or no, fuck or no fuck. A ranking system isn't for you, it's for who you brag to and as such you are losing frame by focusing on what other people think of your conquests. This shit is not red pill.

Get the fuck off this sub for a week, go out, practice game, eat well, and lift.

UrsusG · 2017-03-01T11:34:13+00:00

From the point of view of getting sex from women, focusing on disciplines like math and statistics is boring, unattractive and nerdy.

Are you here to learn about sexual strategy, or are you here to nerdgasm off equations?

Wouldn't a math forum be a more appropriate place?

sir_wankalot_here · 2017-03-01T16:18:45+00:00

This post is mental masturbation which is fun but serves no purpose. The wankalot method, develop yourself to your maximum potential. While you are wasting your time coming up with stupid rating systems, I am approaching. There are two potential outcomes, either success or failure.

According to your system, I probably rate a 3/10 while you probably rate a 8/10 but since I approached 10x as much while you where playing with your jerkoff system, I am getting laid, while you are not.

You then can waste your time coming up with another jerkoff system figuring out why I am getting laid while you are not.

RIP_Betty_White · 2017-03-01T23:31:51+00:00

My rating system

-would bang -wouldn't bang

newName543456 · 2017-03-01T20:38:54+00:00

I have a better one:

You'd hit it.

You might hit it if in a dry spell.

You wouldn't hit it, EVER.

trp_acct · 2017-03-01T07:36:51+00:00

That's because you just gave two weighed personality twice. Nobody actually double counts personality, energy and attitude are a false dichotomy. Being fun to be around (and correctly behaved in situations where being fun might not be the right thing), is the only personality attribute.

Should be ((Face/10 + body/10)/2 + personality)/2. Which means, personality is only half the battle. Lifting is a quarter of the battle, and your face which you can slightly influence is a quarter of the battle.

I like the idea, but the math is a bit fucked. Even if the math is somewhat arbitrary, I disagree with the ideas that the math is based on, not the results of it.

mi1a · 2017-03-01T08:31:17+00:00

I like the concept. Personally, I'd come up with more categories, and assign weights to each. If there were 4 categories, and each had equal weight (25% ), then you'd do .25×category1 + .25×category2... But in the end, you're just trying to quantify highly subjective measurements into universal ratings. Some people will value personality more than physical beauty, some will have categories we'd never think about (she MUST be into piss play and Pokemon), even if there are some commonalities in what we are attracted to physically, our individual preferences will vary. I suppose having a common standard would be helful, and you'd just know to adjust your subjective rating accordingly, but still, you wouldn't know which categories to adjust. Is she a 6 because she's a knockout in the looks department, but her personality sucks, or the opposite?

Maybe another alternative would be to come up with a standard set of categories, but instead of doing math to get one number, make the scale between 0 and 9 (makes more sense anyways), and just put the digits together. If we all agree that the rating system is FACE, then 9746 adds a lot more information.

practicepricipleprep · 2017-03-02T00:56:22+00:00

The goal is to get OUT of your head. I don't see how this mathematical equation aids that objective.

Title	Experimental Rating System
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	6
Comments	13
Date	March 1, 2017 3:45 AM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/5wsvcc/experimental_rating_system/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/experimental-rating-system.41322 https://theredarchive.com/post/41322

Comments