Is there an agreed upon SMV formula?

Auvergnat · 2017-07-21T09:24:24+00:00

Women are attracted to "the Man at the top", with this depending on context and on the girl. Don't bother trying to estimate SMVs, just strive to increase all aspects of yourself that would bring you "at the top".

NeoreactionSafe · 2017-07-21T12:25:50+00:00

Waves versus Particles?

The SMV scale attempts to quantize what is in reality more like a wave or even a field.

We can attempt to create rigid and literal categories, but in reality the SMV is never a fixed entity.

There are no SMV particles... it's really just your magnetism... your "Game field energy".

How strong is your magnetic pull?

Masculinity + Femininity = Attraction

So when a masculine male and a feminine female come near each other the attraction basically overwhelms the room.

That same masculine man paired next to a masculinized feminist with blue hair, badly chosen tattoos and a bad breath will not exactly set the world on fire... however the feminist fuck up female still will have attraction for him even if very slight.

So SMV is difficult to make into a fixed measurement.

virusofthemind · 2017-07-21T11:46:11+00:00

It all depends on the environment. If you're approaching in say a poor African country then getting out of a Ferrari to do so will pretty much nail the deal even if you're a lard ass neck beard, whilst doing so in Monaco will get you looks of disgust, whereas if you're a ripped and buff male model in Monaco without a penny to your name you would do well.

Dont_Get_Scammed · 2017-07-21T11:40:22+00:00

SMV is not based on yourself, but how others perceive you to be valuable, often by looking at the value of their partners. How people assign value is arbitrary. If you're banging 10s or locked one down who respects you absolutely, you're effectively a 10 to other people.

They might not get it at first, but they'll want to understand, just like how little kids want a toy that someone else is playing with and enjoying.

If you saw a girl that was initially a 7 with a 10/10 alpha GOD of a man that was absolutely loyal and respectful to her, she probably would no longer be a 7 to you. Something would be up, and you'd want to understand why.

vengefully_yours · 2017-07-21T23:12:26+00:00

Attractiveness is completely and utterly up the to desires of the one who is attracted. You are or you aren't. Girls tend to go with the consensus, men tend to decide for themselves, but one thing is certain, whatever it is that makes your dick hard it's what does it for you. It's can't be negotiated, and what you like might not be the thing that does it for me.

What I like changes from day to day within reason, mostly tiny girls, small tits, round or heart shaped ass, long dark hair. I lean to the dark skin girls more than white girls. I know lots of guys who only want the pale blondes, they're ok, but give me a choice of two girls, one dark the other light, same weight, measurements, and temperament, I'll go dark girl every time. Some girls like me, most don't. Asian girls come after me, they're tenacious. Black girls did as well before it was socially unacceptable for them to fuck white guys I the south. White girls eye fuck me constantly but aren't as brazen as Asians.

Your value is determined by the scoreboard or matrix in the mind of the other person, and that varies wildly between people. Generally thin as in not fat, fit people with symmetrical facial features are more attractive than fat, lazy fucks with eyes too far apart or close together.

women who is a 7/10 based solely on looks could bump her SMV to 8/10 if they had perfect, extremely positive and attractive style, personality, Position and power.

This shit right here clues me in you're probably a girl. men do not find girls attractive that way at all, especially position and power, to be honest, we don't give a fuck about that shit. Girls do, we don't.

sadomasochrist · 2017-07-21T12:24:22+00:00

In terms of an algorithm, no. Measurement is simple though, ONS you can get +2 points is your SMV.

Self-Making-V2 · 2017-07-21T09:30:37+00:00

SMV isn't a formula, per say.

Heartiste tried making one but it isn't absolute.

You can be a fat, bearded fuck with absolutely no assets or job and still get laid constantly. Trust me, my old mate was like that and i never stood a chance when it came to women compared to him.

He had the childish, don't give a fuck attitude who merely wanted to have fun and bitches swooned for him... Probably helps that word spread he was hung like a horse too :L

ObviouslyRP · 2017-07-21T13:57:44+00:00

I think this pretty much different based on a number of factors. For instance, a girl who has a decent enough career (comfortable income) more likely to be down with guys in the fun zone(high physical attraction but low-medium income)

A hot young women without a comfortable career(or one she hates) much more likely to only be going for guys in the marriage zone. (Very wealthy, or physically attractive with medium-high income)

Basically what determines your SMV varies. It doesn't actually vary but some HB9-10's will get with you while others won't. Until you're objectively top shelf to everyone.

CallMeHaseo · 2017-07-21T16:28:35+00:00

To simplify it, I go by the LMS formula: Looks Money Status 🤔

exit_sandman · 2017-07-21T21:46:15+00:00

50% - Looks (Muscles, face, hair) 10% - Style (Clothes, haircut, accessories) 20% - Personality (Humor, affect, mental health, habits, sexual nature ) 30% - Position and power (Money, influence, connections, family reputation)

Actually, it's more like "Liebig's law of the minimum" when it comes to looks.

Your calculation implies that you could still be 50% datable (or whatever 50% means) if you had 0% looks and 100% of everything else. This doesn't apply. If you have 0% looks, you're fucked.

Sungotanning · 2017-07-23T06:35:39+00:00

Essentially I’m asking how important are different characteristics for men and women.

While one individuals preferences may create value for one person, a market value is the consensus value. You’re individual assessment in negligible and had only a tiny, tiny effect on the market value.

Aphoc · 2017-07-21T18:20:47+00:00

Some time ago, I did write a formula: troubleshooting for new subcribers

just remember that there are no true indicators.

Some say 'Improvement' implies that you enhance aspect of your person which women are attracted to, others say that it's the mental aspect you're radiating when you're traversing toward a goal that makes you attractive.

Well, the short answer is that you're wasting time and mental energy on figuring out what women want instead of focusing on your own improvement regardless of what women wants.

The even shorter one; Lift, dress well, and read up on game.

crixusin · 2017-07-21T17:52:36+00:00

Yeah.

(Lats (in) + Chest (meters)) * Dick Length.

What a fucking stupid question.

RedditAccountDude · 2017-07-21T21:23:22+00:00

Oh God this is a fucking cult

Title	Is there an agreed upon SMV formula?
Author	Sungotanning
Upvotes	12
Comments	23
Date	July 21, 2017 9:03 AM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/6omrd9/is_there_an_agreed_upon_smv_formula/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/is-there-an-agreed-upon-smv-formula.44809 https://theredarchive.com/post/44809

Comments