Its all true.

Specialsnowflake88

October 1, 2014

34 upvotes

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Its all true.
Author	Specialsnowflake88
Upvotes	34
Comments	15
Date	October 1, 2014 3:18 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2hzwfw/its_all_true/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/its-all-true.22167 https://theredarchive.com/post/22167

[–]tombreck2 40 points41 points42 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 21 points21 points21 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[–]markasstrick1233 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]I_HaveAHat0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Specialsnowflake881 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Who put us in these groups anyways? Puberty is a natural biological function, groups of same sex play is not, schools and sporting teams make it feel natural by normalizing it but you're right is learned behaviour through using natural biological functions. We get frustrated when what we naturally crave is kept at a distance through social fact which kids ignore until they realize what is expected of them. Red pill theory is true but what separates an alpha and beta is dominance so beta may imitate to dominate but why? We don't own lands or property that need protecting logically speaking, to give into biological cravings is to see another human as not a human being but a competitor which is natural but fucking unnecessary. We know the competition does not lead to a happier life. Its a biological drive for survival. Our brains are not wired to make us happy, they're wired to help us survive. What makes us happy? Feel good relationships do that, not owning the most in women or money, but having people to share it with and experience things with. I don't know if this is making any sense, would love some feedback.

[–]Specialsnowflake8810 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]thelostfox2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Specialsnowflake885 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]kempff0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]2RedPillSafe3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Specialsnowflake88-3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]2RedPillSafe4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Specialsnowflake881 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]2RedPillSafe1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Again... I started off being snarky and apologize.

My background was in software so I tend to like writing that is hyperfocused on a specific idea and well fleshed out into a coherent model.

You writing style is more flowing and doesn't have the sense of arriving at any mental model that is memorable.

It's like writing the classic essay:

Introduction
Idea 1
Idea 2
Idea 3
Conclusion

...we experience the maximum thought transmission when you really nail your conclusion, much like a lawyer doing his closing arguments.

Can you extract a single coherent message from you original post?

If it was a Field Report we expect a narrative, but you weren't really describing an event. So what was your motivation other than saying "Hello"?

I'm honestly trying to improve your style because I think you have ideas, but they aren't coming forward with enough focus.

Narrow the scope and add more punch.

Comments