~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
[deleted]
[–]stonepimpletilists 17 points18 points19 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Daydreaming is for children.
[–]NeoreactionSafe 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And women are children that often daydream.
[–]Eyes_Of_The_Dragon 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I prefer to keep rooted in reality.
[–]NeoreactionSafe 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
This is so heavily downvoted and I'm not sure why.
I'd say that masculine polarity is a... well... polarity.
In other words you must expect that the forces of Hypergamy will always exist, much like gravity exists, but like flying an airplane you know how masculine polarity makes use of the forces of nature to create flight.
When flying you can always crash because... well... you can.
The knowledge that crashing is possible shouldn't prevent the use of masculine polarity to attain flight, but at the same time if you look at the airplane on the runway and the wings are upside down you might not get in that plane.
In other words the Feminist airplane requires a parachute to Next your way out before the plane crashes.
Plates are like malfunctioning, poorly maintained airplanes.
Women will have dreams of Hypergamy but they will decline in importance if you have masculine polarity.
A woman forgets when something masculine is in front of her.
[–]stonepimpletilists 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Mostly because it's not applicable in the real world.
Do you think any man is every going to have to pick between a unicorn who fantasizes about fucking, and a cheater who will never do it again?
The former is a betabux with a woman who isn't alpha widowed, the latter is basically ultmatecad, post red pill.
Standard tradeoff you're going to make is, shes fucked a fair amount of dudes, and if you lose your polarity, eventually her lizard brain tries to branch swing. So long as her friends (and her) think you're the best she's gonna do, and want you for themselves if she slips, it'll keep her acting right (BPD or other insanity aside)
Youre bang on though, she will forget. The occasional 'respect getter' can fix that.
(RG means some dread, not a backhand people)
The only "real reality" behind all this is the Child Support and Divorce Rape laws.
In the old days if a woman fucked another dude you simply kicked her out through divorce, kept the kids, kept the house, kept all the assets and the woman simply wandered off to become a prostitute or Old Maid while being hated by all of society.
Men used to not have slavery to worry about.
So things are more complicated now.
But generally the seeds of destruction are deeply built into women as AWALT because of their Hypergamy.
We can't deny their bias towards destructive behavior... even in their dreams.
[–]dareealmvp 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
Well it's out of question for me, since I don't go for LTR's at all. Pump-n-dump is the best way to go. Rely on your male friends for emotional fulfillment, rely on one night stands and female friends-with-benefits for sexual fulfillment. It couldn't get any simpler. In today's era of abundance of resources, where females are bound to become hypergamous, it is absurd to expect to come across females who would be willing to get into a monogamous relationship.
Also, a woman who is such that
Her attraction only exists for you
is known well in the red pill terminology as a unicorn, and for a reason you're expected to be well aware of. Even if she does exist, the mere probability of you coming across one is so low that it is the equivalent of you hoping to try hacking someone's bank account by randomly guessing the password. It is absolutely absurd to live life in the hopes of coming across one.
[–][deleted] 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]dareealmvp 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
It's not a good idea to define such a dichotomy of one girl being a 'mental slut' and the other as otherwise. I would hypothesize it to be more along a spectrum, with most women somewhere in the middle, just like any large scale distribution of traits in humans.
Whether or not she cheats also has several other factors involved. For example, one of the factors could be the number of times she comes across extremely high status alpha males (I'm talking about the top 1%), whom women cannot absolutely resist. Assuming she's meeting about a 100 men every year (this number, I highly suspect, should be much higher than that for the average woman) she's bound to cheat at least once a year.
Another factor, is whether or not the LTR is interracial. Interracial ones, for example, where the woman is white and the man is of a race of lower average social status than the average white man (aka Asian/South Asian/even black) breaks up with a probability of 66%, compared to intraracial relationships where both man and woman are white breaking up with 50% probability. Since I'm South Asian, which is by far, by default the race with the lowest social status among all races, it is not a good idea for me to get into LTR's.
Still another factor is the economy. In the post-feminism US and other developed countries, where resources are abundant especially to women, women are bound to become hypergamous and promiscuous. In third world countries like India, China and the Middle East, etc where resources are scarce, reliance on beta bux males is a necessity. Women are opportunistic lovers, and they will stick the beta bux male like a magnet until the resources become abundant, aka the country develops its economy sufficiently. Then they too will become hypergamous and promiscuous. It is but inevitable. I reckon, in the near future, LTR's will be nearly non existent, as resources become more and more abundant. It will be an entirely different story though, if a third world war or some event of apocalyptic consequences were to occur, as is self-explanatory. Only in such a case would I even consider the possibility of entering into a monogamous LTR.
[–][deleted] 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]dareealmvp 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Sorry to have created the wrong impression. I'm Indian, living in India. I'm not American.
You would be surprised to find out, white women have actually the most evenly distributed reply rates to various races of men, after having controlled for factors in the males messaging them first like height, compatibility factors and physical attractiveness (though of course it's still quite skewed towards white men). This measure after controlling for such factors is, I believe, the truest test of how much women of that demographic will like you by default without getting to know you (since compatibility factors only come into the play after you've initialized an interaction). In comparison, Indian women reply the worst to Indian men. To me as an Indian man, they are the least fit option for me. For you as an Asian (which I interpret as Oriental) guy, I would suggest the same too. Asian and Indian women are the biggest chasers of white men. Their reply rates are horribly skewed towards white men with an extremely poor reply rates towards darker skinned males. This is all of course, after controlling for all the above mentioned factors. Without such a control, you will see the expected behavior-women replying the most to men of their own race. But remember, such a reply rate measure without appropriate controls is extremely superficial.
I have theorized that races of women who aren't white and have an inferiority complex associated with their skin color (you'll see they try coloring their hair, applying skin whitening products, straightening their hair when they're naturally curly etc) compensate for it with a superiority complex associated with their gender (the special snowflake feminist) who constantly tells about how patriarchal the Asian/Indian culture is and how they love white culture especially white men. You'll see them chasing aggressively after white men. Needless to say, such a combination of inferiority complex of skin color and superiority complex of gender is the worst possible combination you will ever encounter. That is why I strictly avoid darker skinned women and women who I see are actively trying to copy the look/culture of white women, to the point it looks almost eerie (and there are plenty of such women), in my area though of course the best would have been white women who most assuredly wouldn't have such an inferiority complex. As long as I live in India, I can only stick to the fairer Indian women.
Since I don't have much first-hand dating experience in the US, I can only advice so much.
However, to give you more knowledge, here's a link that you might find useful:
http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-race-affects-whether-people-write-you-back/!
This is also the statistics I've based most of my reply upon.
[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
I wouldn't commit to either. They both sound like damaged goods and forgiving a cheater is failing one of the biggest shit tests in your life.
I'd plate the first one, though.
[–]Jakei34 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
C: Whatever the fuck I want
[–]Chuckwagon1645 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You've been cheated on and want badly to stay with the chick. I can tell by the way you wrote this. I have been in the same boat buddy. I SEENT IT! (lol). I feel for you. I truly do. You need to cut your losses if no kids are involved. It's just not worth the climb over THAT big of a shit mountain.
[–]Endorsed Contributorbogeyd6 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'll play pretend with you. Wait, nevermind. I am a grown ass man.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]stonepimpletilists 17 points18 points19 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NeoreactionSafe 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Eyes_Of_The_Dragon 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NeoreactionSafe 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]stonepimpletilists 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NeoreactionSafe 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dareealmvp 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]dareealmvp 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]dareealmvp 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jakei34 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Chuckwagon1645 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Endorsed Contributorbogeyd6 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link