So a core red pill tenet is that men and women are different - and we attempt to explain how and what the effects are. However, it seems to me like a lot of the content here is kind of surface level - looking at effects and theorizing about the causes. I haven't seen much content discussing the deeper, more fundamental natures of men and women, that lead to all the other theories and effects that we see and discuss.

I came across this thread the other day and it got me thinking, particularly this post:

"Masculine energy is grounded, that's the biggest difference. The feminine seeks boundlessness, the masculine seeks to make boundaries and be grounded. The feminine seeks fluidity, the masculine seeks rigidity.

We often call feminists masculine, but in fact the opposite is true, they are hyperfeminine. Rape culture, patriarchy, these are infinite, boundless concepts, reflective of the feminine. MRAs are an expression of the masculine, they seek groundedness. They list their grievances in list form and suggest solutions, they seek a state of groundedness.

The biggest mistake we make with feminists is that we believe they seek a state of groundedness. They don't. Women might want equality, but the feminine doesn't, because equality is a state of groundedness. The feminine is ravenous. It cannot be satiated, it will never be grounded, because it does not seek to be grounded. It wants to be in motion, it wants to be hysterical. They discuss their grievances in terms of boundless concepts like patriarchy that can never be grounded."

I think this post sums it up really well, and goes a long way toward explaining pretty much everything about how the sexes interact with each other on a fundamental level, like Newton's laws are for physics. All the frustration in regards to interacting with women, why feminism seems so whacko, why girls so often seem crazy to guys, why being a masculine man comprises what it does (outside of in relation to women) - this explanation really ties it all together for me.

The only thing I'm not sure about is the feminine not seeking groundedness - that seems to conflict with women wanting to feel safe with a strong man.

What do you guys think?