I know that this sub gets a lot of hate, so I wanted to make this as a way to appeal to those making arguments about it's destruction and ideology. Red Pillers, please do not vote this down as I have worked hard to put our philosophy into words the white knights can relate to.

Core Reasoning about the red pill philosophy.

The Red Pill philosophy recognizes that women are biologically attracted to more assertive males with highly defined physiques (aphas). The Red Pill does not advocate hating women for what they are attracted to. That is like despising the birds who migrate south for the winter. The Red Pill philosophy argues that men who find themselves not being physically attractive to women exhibit more of these assertive traits and attempt to improve their physique so that women become more interested in them and CONSENT to sex. The Red Pill believes in SELF-IMPROVEMENT, HOLDING ONESELF TO BE CONFIDENT, and NOT TO EXPECT SEX BECAUSE YOU BUY A WOMAN SOMETHING (beta bux). The Red Pill sub officially does not support the appropriation of artistic texts to demonstrate the value of the philosophy. The Red Pill philosophy is that you must accept that your wife will not love you forever even if you match a woman's ideal of a husband.

Here are the most legitimate claims of the MRM according to me: * It is very unfair for a woman to be able to claim a percentage of her ex-husbands earnings annually as an entitlement granted by the State. * It is unreasonable for the State to impose child support payments on a man for a child that he did not sire. * It is constitutionally unacceptable to accept every rape claim from a woman as a sacrosanct truth which needs neither to be scrutinized by due process nor proven beyond a reasonable doubt for a conviction to ensue. * It is very uncomfortable and uncommon for both parties to directly engage in a direct conversation about their intentions before coitus. Such conversations are rare, and to suggest that coitus that happens outside of this conversation is a form of rape is absurd. * It is unjust to assume that if two people engage in sexual intercourse after becoming intoxicated, one is guilty of rape because of their sex; usually the male. * It is an absurd showcase of privilege for a white, upper-middle-class women's hookup after drinking five shots to be considered part of a national rape crisis, while forced male rape in prison is a common joke, and that child-migrant rape is almost completely ignored by the media.

Again, members of the sub, please don't downvote; this to fight for what we stand for.