I thought I would put this post up as it is thought provoking. It has come about from a comment in another post but it seems to be generating some interest.

First, let me be VERY clear here. This is not anti gay or anti homosexual. If you are gay that is perfectly fine with me. It is a discussion about masculinity today and where we draw our red pill influences from.

So we have three books which receive a lot of praise and attention on here. Many subscribers adore these books and use them as a blueprint for red pill behaviour. The three books are:

American Psycho Fight Club The way of men

Now all three of these books were written by gay men (Costanza: not that there's anything wrong with that). So here we are on a sub which deals with sexual strategy for heterosexual men, yet it appears a lot of people have taken a lot away from the writing of gay authors.

It strikes me as ironic that we are now learning how to be happy straight men from gay men. So modern feminism has now left straight men learning to be masculine from gay men. When you look at gay culture and the emphasis on body building and casual sex, it is even more striking how much red pill philosophy is in tune with gay culture.

There will be a lot of dudes on here who get mad about this and a lot more who scratch their heads. I don't really have a point to make, but I am very interested to see what everyone else thinks.

I have no agenda to push here, I am heterosexual and I think live and let live regarding homosexuality. I am not into politics. Just thought this is an interesting paradox to discuss.