Recently on TRP and its sister subreddits I've come across a number of people claiming that rape is an alpha behavior because it is an aggressive and dominant action, and this is evidenced by the fact that many incredibly alpha men throughout history have been rapists. This is nothing but Blue Pill propaganda that smears Red Pillers by associating our definition of "alpha" with rapists. Red Pillers who buy it obviously did not think that position through to its logical conclusion.

Just because a man overall is alpha does not mean he is incapable of performing beta actions or having some beta characteristics. In fact, all men are a mixture of alpha and beta characteristics. No man is "pure" alpha or "pure" beta. The "pure" betas were selected out of the gene pool generations ago, and the only man that is 100% alpha 100% of the time is our fictional archetype, Chad Thundercock.

Do you think Chad Thundercock goes around raping women because he is aggressive and dominant and takes whatever he wants, when he wants? Hell no. The fact of the matter is that since Chad's SMV is so high, there is no woman in the world that he can rape because they will always consent to him under any circumstances. It is logically impossible for Chad to rape a woman.

This has absolutely nothing to do with morals. If you can't get a woman to consent, it means your SMV is too low. If you decide to force yourself on her, you are losing frame. No matter how you look at it, rape is necessarily beta behavior. Do not believe the subversive Blue Pill propaganda.