Scott Adams Does it Again

rebuildingMyself · 2015-01-05T03:16:20+00:00

[permanently deleted]

Red_August · 2015-01-05T12:13:16+00:00

A quote from Adams from that blog article he wrote:

"The reality is that women are treated differently by society for exactly the same reason that children and the mentally handicapped are treated differently. It’s just easier this way for everyone. You don’t argue with a four-year old about why he shouldn’t eat candy for dinner. You don’t punch a mentally handicapped guy even if he punches you first. And you don’t argue when a women tells you she’s only making 80 cents to your dollar. It’s the path of least resistance. You save your energy for more important battles..." - Scott Adams

Cue the usual ensuing theatrics, and outrage from the centrifuged obese hamsters, but Adams goes even a step further, and responds to them in the comment section of a feminist blog article vilifying him:

Adams' response comment:

"Is this an entire website dedicated to poor reading comprehension? I don’t think one of you understood the writing. You’re all hopping mad about your own misinterpretations.

That’s the reason the original blog was pulled down. All writing is designed for specific readers. This piece was designed for regular readers of The Scott Adams blog. That group has an unusually high reading comprehension level.

In this case, the content of the piece inspires so much emotion in some readers that they literally can’t understand it. The same would be true if the topic were about gun ownership or a dozen other topics. As emotion increases, reading comprehension decreases. This would be true of anyone, but regular readers of the Dilbert blog are pretty far along the bell curve toward rational thought, and relatively immune to emotional distortion.

I’ve written on the topic how you can’t mix incendiary images in the same piece without the readers’ brains treating the images as though they were connected, no matter how clearly you explain that they are not. My regular readers understand that I do that intentionally as part of the fun. When quoted out of context, the piece becomes dangerous.

You can see that the comments about the piece were little more than name-calling. When confronted with that sort of reaction, would it be wiser to treat the name-callers as you might treat respected professors with opinions worthy of consideration, or should you treat the name-callers as you would angry children, by not debating and not taking it personally?

You’re angry, but I’ll bet every one of you agrees with me."

RICCIedm · 2015-01-05T14:01:16+00:00

those are some great Strips. Thanks for that, n4cer126

RedPillSafe · 2015-01-05T14:29:23+00:00

That's the irony about Red Pill.

If we really wanted personal advantage we would want all other males as beta as they can be to keep them as losers and lower the competition.

But on the flip side if we keep allowing things to get worse (increasing Monk Mode MGTOW as well as hordes of betas, white knights and manginas) the civilization will completely collapse and that is a bad future.

Seems the idea is to allow anyone smart enough to learn to become Red Pill.

It will likely create a counterbalance to Feminism.

Title	Scott Adams Does it Again
Author	n4cer126
Upvotes	40
Comments	16
Date	January 5, 2015 2:56 AM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2rd1i9/scott_adams_does_it_again/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/scott-adams-does-it-again.27489 https://theredarchive.com/post/27489

Comments