TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

The nice guy shaming is really starting to spread

Bobsutan

January 27, 2013
7 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Archived from /r/TheRedPill

r/TheRedPill is a subreddit for discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/TheRedPill archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title The nice guy shaming is really starting to spread
Author

Bobsutan

Upvotes 7
Comments 18
Date January 27, 2013 7:14 AM UTC
(13 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/17cz25/the_nice_guy_shaming_is_really_starting_to_spread/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/the-nice-guy-shaming-is-really-starting-to-spread.235360
https://theredarchive.com/post/235360
Red Pill terms in post
nice guy
Top posts by Bobsutan

NEWBIES READ THIS -- Comprehensive Guide to Game

556 upvotes
June 9, 2011
/r/seduction

A simple reminder...

439 upvotes
July 14, 2012
/r/seduction

DON'T BE THAT GIRL

366 upvotes
December 5, 2012
/r/MensRights

Don't be that gal (LPS edition)

358 upvotes
December 6, 2012
/r/MensRights

Jodi Arias verdict: GUILTY of 1st Degree Murder

341 upvotes
May 8, 2013
/r/MensRights

Obama is sexist and here's why...

263 upvotes
February 15, 2013
/r/MensRights

NEWBIES READ THIS - Attraction & Approaching

234 upvotes
October 9, 2011
/r/seduction

NEWBIES READ THIS - IOIs & IODs, Qualification, and more!

205 upvotes
October 13, 2011
/r/seduction

Comments

[–]Bobsutan[S] 9 points10 points11 points 13 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I went ahead and commented adding a modified version of the post linked to on the Roosh forums thread:

Of late, it has become fairly common to see nice guys being shamed, bashed and presented as not just undesirable, but also immoral. It is the most wicked form of hamster that the internet has seen so far.

To understand why, we have to go a bit into the past. In the past, not many men were wise to the real state of the sexual market, particularly who got girls and how they got girls. Occasionally someone would whine about being left out in the cold just for being nice, but it was widely understood that nice guys were still preferred for relationships and girls loved them after they matured.

With the rise of connectivity and sharing of stories, and particularly actual [URL="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/usmt/1999/00000025/00000004/art00010"]empirical[/URL] [URL="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/klu/sers/2005/00000053/F0020005/00006758"]data[/URL], it soon became apparent that the real situation was much worse. The gnawing feeling of those hordes of nice guys became more than a feeling - it began a reality. With this truth now impossible to hide, they became even more discontent and the whining increased. Some of them embraced the PUA skills; the others decided it was simply not worth it and retreated into their shells, similar to the herbivores of Japan. However, their outcry was now very public.

With this truth - that women don't go for nice guys at all, even though they mostly claim that they do - being now both confirmed and highly visible, the feminists and other a..hole-digging women (The observation is spot on here that feminists have much higher dominance thresholds, i.e. a more dominant or a..hole-ish man is needed to make them hot & bothered than for the average girl) decided to adopt another tactic. No woman wants to be seen as responsible for her own poor mating choices, naturally. This is the basis of the hamster. But how to reconcile it with the reality? With hiding the truth now not being viable anymore, there was only one option left: present the nice guys as not really desirable - or 'not really "nice"'.

Herculean efforts by hamsters all around the world are needed to perform this ultimate vanishing act because the nice guy behavior is so visible and plainly desirable to common sense, but fear not. The avalanche of articles bashing nice guys as manipulators, jerks, sexists and so on is now close to accomplishing the task.

You can see the results even here - not only does the general public now believe the bull that "nice guys are not really nice", but also some red-pill forum members are tacitly agreeing. Once you've spent years away from being a nice guy with no game, you tend to forget all that you've had to endure before. It becomes like an unpleasant dream which, in hindsight, seems completely avoidable - with our current knowledge! But most nice guys are still bombarded with too much crap to know the difference. It is a grave mistake to forget where many of us came from and join the bashing just because we understand the why of it now. However, most guys do not. With the amount of brainwashing, can you really blame them?

Of course, that brings us to the final point - is what these articles are saying just the hamster acting up, or is it true? In a sense, it is true. None of the nice guy behavior is attractive, that we know. We also recognize that it is not congruent, although most of these guys don't know it - they have never been taught any other way. Genuinely believing that girls like you being nice and will (eventually) reward you with love and sex is not lying, it's just believing the social programming you were fed growing up. And we all know how this wrong is formed: through the words of these women themselves and the mantra we are all familiar with: "I just want someone nice", and "Where have all the good men gone?" (commonly meant as "men who don't cheat, treat women like sexual objects etc - i.e. "being nice") Also the media helped a great deal, just look at your average rom-com.

So women are still verbally making "being nice" extremely important to a man who doesn't know better. It is impossible to say that they aren't asking for niceness. The only thing left is - what actually represents being nice? [URL="http://www.buzzfeed.com/hnigatu/13-reasons-why-nice-guys-are-the-worst"]This article[/URL] rightly points out that just not raping someone is not nice, it's just normal. Same for waiting until the person opens up and finally recognizes and rewards your support. [B]But what is nice then?[/B]

Is it not pressuring her into sex? We know that this sexual strategy is mostly a big piece of fail. Is it doing her favors, such as repairing her car, helping her with homework or walking her home in the rain? Apparently that isn't nice either, even though most of us would be delighted if a stranger of the same gender did that for us. [B]What is being nice then?[/B] Is it financial support? Judging by how quickly women divorce boring Beta providers, I don't think that's it either. Maybe listening skills and willingness to offer support? Nope. Chivalry, Titanic-style? Hell no.

Conclusion: while these articles correctly point out that nice behaviour is not sexually attractive at all, and that some types of nice behavior are not actually nice, it still fails to bridge the yawning chasm between the spoken desires of the female gender and the actual reality on the ground.

At best, while all women claim that they "just want someone nice", the threshold for what (to them) constitutes "niceness" is infinite - somewhere far above listening, helping, being respectful, offering financial aid and sacrificing your life for others.

And I thought that Mother Theresa was a nice person.

edit: you should all watch this if you haven't already: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=a9XDb0nxSO4

[–]TRP Vanguardtheubercuber11 points12 points13 points 13 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

My favorite comment:

There are no nice guys, it is just their ploy to get women

I see that is working great for them

[–]zionController7 points8 points9 points 13 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This is hilarious. Once upon a time being nice was the way you got women. Now its a manipulative ploy lmao... Which gives rise to Game, which in all actuality is a manipulative ploy

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp7 points8 points9 points 13 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But it gives them the vagina tingles, so it's ok. Being nice doesn't make them horny. The hamster rationalization is therefore that being nice is a diabolical ploy. I wish we were making this shit up

[–]zionController7 points8 points9 points 13 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm coming to the conclusion that shaming the nice guys is a feminine imperative tactic to help women rationalize riding the carousel. "Someone is being nice to you?? Misogynist! He just wants you to be his wife! Don't fall for it - there are good club bouncers and drug dealers that you should be sleeping with who won't treat you like real people.... thats how you know they're good!"

Look at all the anti-slut shaming they do, and then the nice-guy shaming that compounds on top of it. The feminine imperative has made sluttiness mainstream. Its no wonder fundamentalist countries are trying to kill us. They don't want this to spread over there.

[–]Bobsutan[S] 4 points5 points6 points 13 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm coming to the conclusion that shaming the nice guys is a feminine imperative tactic to help women rationalize riding the carousel.

This is exactly what it is. Women only want a "nice guy" if they're already attracted to them. However, a few generations ago being nice got women attracted, or at least that's the idea passed down through our media and social programming. As we all know full well though being nice is not an attractive behavior in of itself. In many cases if the woman isn't attracted, it actually hurts men's chances and at best gets them friend-zoned, or at worse they're put in the "creepy" bucket.

You have to be found attractive BEFORE you are "nice" by the standards society deems as being nice. Even then it can be seen as an emasculating thing and can ruin the attraction you may have going for you, so you need to be nice in a measured way. Sucks, but that's the reality in which we live.

So how does this relate to being feminine imperative thinking? By framing nice guys as not being nice, they are not burdened with the responsibility of rewarding nice behavior with sexual reward. Instead they can reserve sexual reward for any behavior they deem worthy, whether it's actually good for them or not in the long run. This way they can feel free to fuck any guy that comes along and gets the tingles going. It's not until they're much older, the looks have faded, and they're running full steam towards the wall that they reevaluate their life's decisions and start screening men for "nice guy" qualities instead fo the tingles they give them. I mean they do, but not to such a degree when they've got the kind of freedom they enjoy in thier late teens and early 20s when they're at the height of their attractiveness and the world is their oyster.

[–]Bobsutan[S] 0 points1 point2 points 13 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You had me right up until you called Game being manipulative.

[–]zionController0 points1 point2 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

mmm its a fine line. The common perception is that its manipulative. If JBY is considered manipulative by blue pill standards then game should be considered manipulative by a long shot. I personally don't think of it as manipulation, but it illustrates the poin tI was trying to make.

[–]toysjoe5 points6 points7 points 13 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's okay. They'll sing a different tune when they hit thirty.

[–]mrdizzy 2 points3 points4 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

By then, the stable "nice guy" has moved on. Hence the desperate thirty-something female who has partied for the last 15 years and wonders why she's alone.

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp3 points4 points5 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They might piss everyone off before then.

[–]ihavespellingproblem5 points6 points7 points 13 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You know this Nice Guy thing, and Game itself for that matter, reminds me of an experiment scientists did some time ago. A guy called B.F. Skinner took pigeons and put them in a cage with no food. He fed them only when a pigeon would press a button. The trick was he would give out the food on random. No patterns, random.
So when those pigeons got hungry, they started pressing the button, sometimes they would give out food, sometimes not. What happened after a while, they started develop rituals. Before pressing the button they would turn around, or flap their wings, do some river dance thing, sing some dumb pigeon song.
Pigeons don't get randomness. They need cause and effect. They can't go "hey, this shit is random, all we need is to press a button until it gives out the food" because they are dumb and they were made to shit on monuments, not to think of mathematics and statistics. Randomness is out of their comprehension, it causes cognitive dissonance and shuts their brain. They need cause and effect thing. So they would link their behavior to the food giveaway because it would eliminate randomness. "I flapped my wings, pressed button, got food. Mystery solved." It doesn't matter that they still get food on random, they have the link, they ignore the rest.
I feel like no matter how much logic I put in to trying to understand women behavior, and they ways of how you handle them, it would still be my stupid pigeon dance. Bitches are random like weather. And until they are random, they will get all the fucking spectrum of behavior from guys. No shaming would work ever. No shaming will stop people from being Nice Guys. Logic will, not before women stop being random.

[–]zionController8 points9 points10 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you kick a nice dog enough times, you will have a mean dog on your hands.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women aren't random, that's why game works. But yes, to nice guys it seems random or illogical.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Never heard of BF Skinner before. I'll look into his stuff.

[–]mrdizzy 0 points1 point2 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

dumb pigeon song

[–]CustodialConviction1 point2 points3 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would rather be called the biggest piece of shit in the world than a nice guy.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Where did people get the idea being "entitled" is bad. If I am nice to a person I except them to be nice to me. If you are dating a girl you are entitled to sex. The girl is entitled to her boyfriend going down on her etc.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter