TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

      • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead

      • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

The UN's Risible #HeForShe Campaign: Pointless Self-Flagellation for Sex-Starved Beta Males

NailedToTheCross
September 26, 2014
75 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Archived from /r/TheRedPill

r/TheRedPill is a subreddit for discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/TheRedPill archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title The UN's Risible #HeForShe Campaign: Pointless Self-Flagellation for Sex-Starved Beta Males
Author

NailedToTheCross
Upvotes 75
Comments 39
Date September 26, 2014 1:01 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2hiver/the_uns_risible_heforshe_campaign_pointless/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/the-uns-risible-heforshe-campaign-pointless-self.227913
https://theredarchive.com/post/227913
Red Pill terms in post
betathe red pill

Comments

[–]j-pHil42 points43 points44 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

There's a Joe Rogan podcast that puts it perfectly. This is the opposite of feminism. Men coming to the rescue of their social inferiors. Woman are not given more agency or individual empowerment. We are witnessing the demonization of the male gender on all fronts. This being engineered. Know this.

[–]thredditsowaway17 points18 points19 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Women are equal, but they need the help of men to be equal.

I'm no doctor, but if anyone in this thread is having a migraine right now, I think I know why.

[–]TRP VanguardtrpSenator9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Reminds me of Daniel Tosh when he said something like: Oh women, you're so smart? You're just as capable of men? When's the last time you were able to oppress an entire gender?

Obviously it's a joke, because men were also being oppressed even more so throughout history, but it does make a good point. If men REALLY did live in a patriarchy (which they don't. Unless the writers of the patriarchy were fucking morons) then that right there shows that men are more capable than women. So by their very logic, the very existence of patriarchy means men are better.

[–]thredditsowaway2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, no, women could easily dominate us, but they refuse to do so because they aren't manipulative and power-hungry like us evil, evil men.

/s by the way

[–]anonlymouse16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the opposite of feminism.

No, it's the opposite of what feminism claims to be. It is the true face of feminism however.

[–]TRP VanguardtrpSenator0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's interesting, Joe Rogan distanced himself from MRAs and sort of went in support of feminism, yet he even said that all the male feminists he ever sees seems like guys saying whatever bs they have to say in hopes that those girls will like them back. That they all look and seem like the type of guys that are so depraved of pussy, they are willing to do and say anything to get female approval.

[–]Conquerz0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

care to link please? i'd love to hear it

[–]a-memorable-fancy36 points37 points38 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Emma's speech: "Feminists don't hate men! We just hate everything that makes men masculine! So don't be afraid to be a weeping, self-centered female man, because uhh mental health i guess. Now excuse me while I go get turned inside out by my rugby playing boyfriend."

A shit-test with unilateral international support. Impressive, but fleeting.

[–][deleted] 20 points20 points20 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]2mbillion11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I had to google who this man was - anddddddd awalt

[–]Wargame4life1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And to think some chumps actually lap this up and think the will be irresistible to women when they learn how emotional and sensitive they are.......lol

[–]Endorsed Contributorgekkozorz1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's funny to think there are shlubs around the globe right now who watched that speech, beat off to pornographic Rule 34 artwork of Hermione, then said to themselves, "so if I want to score a girl like that I just have to be understanding and effeminate? GOT IT!"

Some men will never learn.

[–]Wargame4life1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Personally i have never found her attractive, and the only people i know in real life that do were massively ugly obnoxious nerds.

She is very much a nerds pin up, as looks wise i would probably turn her down, she is boney and unfeminine looking.

[–]Endorsed Contributorgekkozorz29 points30 points31 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I've said this before, and I would like to say it again. The very concept of feminism is contradictory. It has two central premises:

  1. Women are strong and independent and can do anything men can do just as well or better. BUT...

  2. Women need men to fix all their problems for them. Which means that women DEPEND on men, which contradicts to that buzzword we used in premise 1, "independent."

You can't have both, feminism. You're either our inferior and you need our help, or you're our equal and you're just fine on your own.

If you believe that men and women are equal, but expect men to cater to women in a one-way exchange, you do not believe in equality. You believe in female supremacy, and that's exactly what feminism 3.0 is.

[–]I_Wear_Jorts58 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The appeal to equality used by feminists is such bullshit. They, along with other pro-minority groups, have changed their goals from "equal opportunity" to "equality." So they force these ideals and statistics down our throats, like a square peg in a round hole. They don't want the "equal opportunity" to get a job. They want the company to artificially alter their hiring strategies to ensure that 50% of people hired are women, even if they are much less qualified.

And yet, even though women want "equality," they still want to maintain their current privileges. They want to be viewed as tough, strong, and independent, but still feel entitled to being the first person pulled from a burning building. They want to be seen as smart, intelligent, and responsible, but don't want to have to be accountable for lapses in judgement (see the current rape hysteria on college campuses). They want to dress "sexy" and be viewed as beautiful little snowflakes, but don't want to be looked at by "creepy guys." They want all benefits of "equality," but none of the downsides.

I guess in the mind of feminists, all people are equal, but some are more equal than others.

[–]Incubuns2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They don't want anything anywhere NEAR equality. Women earn 77% of what men do, because they work so much less - yet they control more than 60% of wealth. Women in Western countries are dramatically less likely to be murdered or assaulted than men - yet how many campaigns against violence against women do you see, as opposed to violence in general? Women have been better off than men on the most fundamental measures of wellbeing for decades and feminism is still grabbing for more.

[–]willyfresh916 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you believe that men and women are equal, but expect men to cater to women in a one-way exchange, you do not believe in equality. You believe in female supremacy, and that's exactly what feminism 3.0 is.

This point will never be heard by feminists. That's why all we can do is improve ourselves, and let the rest of the pieces fall into place.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana21 points22 points23 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Emma Watson wants you to know her life - that of a pretty, rich, famous, popular female megastar - has been monstrously traumatic, because of sexism.

Breitbart had much harsher criticism of Emma's speech than I did, and he has some good points too.

Looks like he definitely found it risible.

[–]SeekingAlpha14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Andrew Breitbart has been dead 2+ years. If he did anything you allege, then there is a MUCH bigger story here.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess he didn't find it risible then.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedPillDad7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What would be useful here would be a UN initiative which takes all the white knights who sign up for this pathetic campaign, give them each a blue helmet, and ship them out to some god-forsaken shit-hole where they can do some real rescuing while growing some frickin' balls.

[–]Endorsed Contributorgekkozorz2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I would support something like this. Create something called "CAMPAIGN TO SAVE ALL WOMEN," get the heroic white knights to sign up for it, and use their freely given labor to actually do something positive for the world.

Us misogynistic equality-haters will stay home and make sure someone takes care of the ladies while they're gone.

[–]sir_wankalot_here0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Us misogynistic equality-haters will stay home and make sure someone takes care of the ladies while they're gone.

We need more noble self sacrificing men like yourself. Possibly we might have to sacrafice ourselves by doing MMF threesomes. For men who are more advanced in age like myself this can be very dangerous. No dears it will has already gone up three times. Yes I understand that you are upset that I banged the other girl twice and you only once. You think you can make it go up again ? Ok dear you do the best you can to make it happen.

For an older man like myself, these sorts of exertions put a lot of strain on my heart. I could have a heart attack.

Fortunately I see there are younger men like you who are willing to make noble sacrifices.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

What a waste. She has an opportunity to talk about real issues facing women in the world. She has closer knowledge than most people having a co-star who's father and brother attempted to murder her because of religious ideology that demeans and injures women (http://news-briefs.ew.com/2010/07/02/harry-potter-actress-escapes-murder-attempt/) and she chooses instead to talk about men need to be more like women.

[–]anonlymouse10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

That's the thing, if feminism talked about real, serious problems, they couldn't get all the solipsists on board. They need to talk about insignificant things that everyone has experienced.

[–]2mbillion9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Because in most of the world women indeed have equal rights. The only thing to talk about are insignificant things. There are not any more opportunities only men get to have: its simply not the way the developed world is anymore.

Ergo, the only thing left to soapbox about are this flimsly wishy washy talking points that are based on subjective interpretations of situations.

We have the most free society for women ever created and what do they choose to do with their time? some go become doctors, lawyers or otherwise people of prestige, some choose different paths, because its their right - yet some still need to belabor the notion that they still are not equal.

This is because outcomes are still not equal. Outcomes are dependent on personal acumen. This is where women come up short. They lack the personal agenda and defined acumen to excel the way many men do. CEO's, innovative engineers, the economic elite all have one thing in common: a razor sharp development of their preternatural desire to achieve their goals. If women lack this it is not a mans fault any more than being born a man is his fault.

Its time the womens movement takes a long hard look at themselves and starts moving towards developing worthwhile social and economic constructs for women instead of wasting time complaining about the gaze of men.

[–]GruntStyle03112 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

One of the most common arguments I hear from feminists, whenever their claims of male privilege are squashed with logic is "Then why are there more men in politics than women?" Or "Well, then why haven't we had a single female president yet?"

The answer is simply, because the number of men who put in the amount of work and dedication far outnumbers the amount of women. There's quite a few female politicians. Senators, congressmen, governors, etc. And women have every right to run for president, (though I think that would be the end of America) just because Palin or Hillary didn't win the election, doesn't mean it's because women can't win. It means there are far more men that are better qualified. You can't just wake up one day, decide to become a politician, quit your job at the salon, and get elected into office. But you have every legal right to try.

Men hold the majority of the power, because they work for it, and know what the hell they are doing..

But feminists don't want equality. They want all the power, without any of the responsibility. The reward without the risk. The pay without the work.

[–]Endorsed Contributorgekkozorz2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Something else worth mentioning: which gender has more incarcerated, more homeless, more suicides and more workplace deaths? Here's a hint: It's not women.

There are more men at the top of society, yes. But there's also way more men at the bottom.

That's what happens when your gender has to make bigger risks and has a smaller safety net. The good ones rise to the top, the bad ones sink to the bottom.

But of course, those at the bottom are invisible to women, so they are not factored into women's perception of men's place in the world.

[–]GruntStyle03110 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Great point. Also one of the main reasons TRP exists... To help men rise to the top, instead of suffering a terrible fate.

[–]robot-b 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yes the top/bottom sandwich is something many forget. But also keep in mind that the bottom men are invisible.

A different perspective I read the other day: 'when is the last time you saw an attractive female homeless person?'

[–]2mbillion0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

your analysis of politics is very interesting. Its that logical disconnect that they do not see. The disconnect between being a free person and then somehow becoming a really rich and powerful free person. Its not as if these people, barring trust fund babies - who are equally female as they are male, become rich and powerful because they just sat around complaining about other people keeping them down.

I cannot even surmise to account for the numerous times somebody has attempted to keep me in my place in the business world and politics makes the backstabbing in the business world look benign. It reminds me of a weezer lyric from my youth (yes this is a slight attempt at humor but it rings true)

"if you want it, you can have it, but youve got to learn to reach out there and grab it"

[–]cooltrip2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Feminists want to get some #HeForShe but without giving any #SheForHe in return. All they do is demand things without offering anything in return, but sex to alphas and hate to betas.

[–]Dark_Shroud2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I once asked a woman what does she do for me? Her response wasn't a pretty scene.

Between Vasalgel and Japanese sex robots the future is looking pretty good for men.

[–]sir_wankalot_here0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Vasalgel and Japanese sex robots marginalize women,both should be heavily taxed and the revenue from this tax going to noble causes endorsed by brave women like Miss Emma who have been oppressed by disgusting neck beards like you.

[–]Dark_Shroud1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah add in the floor cleaning/vacuuming/scrubbing robots. Window cleaning robots are coming to market soon. That's not counting dish washers. Suddenly house work is so much less demanding. Yes John Deer has an automated lawn mower as well.

There are also coffee pots that hook into a water line and run on a timer. Automatic fresh coffee/tea every morning. So all you have to do is load the grounds and set the timer & occasionally run the pitcher & grounds pot through the dishwasher

Once we get self loading & unloading Washing Machines & Clothes Dryers I'm set.

It's getting easier & easier to live alone or without a "woman's touch." Hell most young women in the US can't cook worth a damn anyway.

[–]sir_wankalot_here0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe it is good for the younger generation like yourself. I am a traditonalist, and do not really like modern technology, which is ironic since I made a lot of money from it.

I dislike telephones, in rural parts of America when I was growing up, party lines as in many houses sharing one telphone like where common. Telphones where something women blabbed on and where only to be used by men for emergencies. I detest talking on telephones.

Television, I hate the fucking thing. When I was a kid we only had two and a half channels. For the same reason I hate videos, unless they are instructional.'

I detest credit cards and ATM machines, I like cash in my pocket. I am told in many parts of America now, you are discouraged from paying in cash. How can a stupid piece of plastic feel the same as a roll of cash in your pocket ?

The web I like, it is like a book you can exhange ideas with. Social media websites like facebook are a self confirmation of a decadent society.

I feel a man has to do physical work once in a while. Where I am labour is cheap, but I will still help out my guys digging a hole or swinging a hammer.

Not saying you are wrong, but I don't particularly want to live in a sterile place that is populated by machines. I like traditonal markets, where you can browse, touch things, feel things, smell things. Some of the smells are good ones, some of them are bad like a dead cat or rat rotting for a day :-)

[–]cali_gunner1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the title of the breitbart article, wow.

[–]autmed0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"As a man..."

I guess some of you Red Pill Men have some serious Feminist-type Issues. And can't understand the real, not Cult-like feminist movement.

Yes, Red Pill does give advice that help men to achieve sexual success in culture lacking a positive identity for men.

But one thing is sexual interaction, and the other is everyone else you don't want, or will not have a sexual interaction. If you just see women as sexual, men satisfying animals. Well I pity you for lacking a meaningful non sexual life.

[–]robot-b 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

mind giving me a definition for this movement?

Seems like a no true scotsman

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter