~ archived since 2018 ~

Watching a process changes it - what does it mean?

Dopaminedetoxing · 2021-04-07T22:44:55+00:00

Context: learning game vs already having game...

Dopaminedetoxing

April 7, 2021

1 upvotes

/r/askTRP

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Watching a process changes it - what does it mean?
Author	Dopaminedetoxing
Upvotes	1
Comments	5
Date	April 7, 2021 10:44 PM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/askTRP
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/mmdyym/watching_a_process_changes_it_what_does_it_mean/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/askTRP/watching-a-process-changes-it-what-does-it-mean.764315 https://theredarchive.com/post/764315

Comments

[–]kclanton80 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If I understand your question correctly....maybe I'm not sure.

I would relate it to a classical piano player versus someone who is a composer..... Or even someone who doesn't play piano but has learned how to create melodies, beats, songs off of instict, trial, and error.

The classical piano player often struggles to step outside of the Ridgid confines of their technique. This would relate to game in the sense that many on here follow the rules of the red pill so strictly that they can't see the grey area.

Only text for logistics would be the biggest offender.

Where as someone who has developed naturally on their own is able to use the tips to implement it into their established game and style. They freely break or tweak the rules as they see fit based on the woman and situation.

The person with the watched process will take far longer to develop a natural feel for game. The person who had already developed game to a certain degree would simply become even more deadly in said game if they began taking piano lessons ( learning game trp etc)

[–]Dopaminedetoxing[S] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]kclanton80 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

The text for logistic rule is just taken too literally. There is nothing wrong with some playful banter through text....or even a random maintenance text even when your not trying to see her.

The point is not to be some text buddy who is orbiting her. You use text as a tool to get to a date ( a meeting) and your strategy can vary based in the woman your dealing with. It's a rule for newbies to accentuate the fact that they should not become an orbiter....push for a date.

For someone more experienced...we understand how to read a woman better, and If it's even worth asking for a date. So it's a good concept....but if taken literally...it's absolutely false.

I met a woman out running recently...she texted me the day after and we exchanged a few messages throughout the day. Yesterday I messaged her and we did the same thing... i felt she needed just a bit more warming up after the first day we texted. Which then culminated in me setting up a date in a few days after two days of some brief sprodaic texting.

By day two she was responding faster...sending emojis..even was able to get a bit sexually suggestive. Boom I will set it now. She said name the time date and the place and I'm there.

I'm now going to go radio silent for a few days until I will text her mainly for the logistics.....unless she reaches out fist. I won't mind a bit more banter and maybe even building some sexual tension. This scenario applies with this particular girl...its not the same formala I would use every time. Her interest is pretty high.

If it was lower.....I would not have texted her that next day, after she texted the day prior. I would have waited a few days then specifically asked for a date only. No banter with Luke warm women....you make them make a decision immediately. I'm not wasting time building interest or orbiting.

So there's just lots of nuaince lost in a phrase like " just text for logistics" and it literally comes down to the specific woman. However the idea of the rule is sound,. and should be the goal and what you move things toward as quickly as possible. Sure I had some fun banter off and on for two days....no big deal. Would she have said yes if I said.....hey we met at the park yesterday...meet meet Friday from a drink. Possibly yes..but I think I'm.much more solid ground now and will close the deal.

I also had to ask some questions I didn't get a chance to ask....do you have a kid etc....

So the rule is sound....but it's not to be taken too literally in my opinion.

Overly long reply concluded haha

[–]Dopaminedetoxing[S] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link