Anyone have an answer for this?
It would undoubtedly make sense that a feminist agenda would be to curtail prostitution. The given reason would be the standard objections toward female objectification. However, we would all understand their motives to be more cryptic. That is, sex is a currency that should be kept in high demand. And given that women would exercise control over that currency, it would grant them a certain degree of control over men.
Learning game is all well and good as it affords men greater access to the currency. It seems to me, however, if we wanted to truly wrestle control away from women, the answer would be simple-prostitution.
Now, this would be outside the realm of raising children. I’m talking about just plates. And rather than all the time/resource it takes to spin them, just start paying for the affections of women. In terms of sex, it would appear that men need women more than women need men. However, outside of this narrow paradigm, I don’t think it could be argued that women need men much more than men need women. If men formed a united front in this endeavor, would it not completely crush the female reproductive imperative, giving men the upper hand?
[–]harkrank 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points4 points4 points | Copy Link
[–]rebuildingMyself1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]asd1100 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]asd1100 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MrDaddy3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MoneyMonger2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Offensive_Brute-1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]CokeandGrappa1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Offensive_Brute-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OutlawPUA-4 points-3 points-2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link