~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
[deleted]
[–]OriginalPostSearcher 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
X-Post referenced from /r/socialskills by /u/lambertb How to Be a Great Communicator: Improve Your Map of the Social World
I am a bot. I delete my negative comments. Contact | Code | FAQ
[–]sonder_one 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
TIL that vomiting up redundant word diarrhea makes you a "better communicator".
[–]lambertb 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Sorry you didn't find it helpful. I'll post some references tomorrow if you want to read about the evidence behind what I posted.
[–]sonder_one 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You misunderstand. The article claimed that a person who uses a bunch of synonyms to describe a person is a good communicator while someone who doesn't repeat himself is a bad one. That was the sample near the bottom. I find that asinine.
I was not referring to your post as a whole.
[–][deleted] 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]lambertb 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I cross-posted from r/socialskills. Is that not allowed in this sub? I've done it before without any objection.
The idea is that people who have more differentiated, abstract, and integrated dimensions for representing the social world will, in general, be more skillful communicators.
The most common way of measuring this degree of differentiation (also known as "cognitive complexity") is to ask people to write brief impressions of liked and disliked others.
These impressions are then scored by counting the number of unique descriptors in the impressions. More descriptors means higher "cognitive complexity."
If a descriptor is repeated it's not counted twice, but synonyms would be counted individually.
I didn't make these measures up. They go back at lest until the 1960s.
When I get back to my office, I'll add some references to bolster what I've written.
But you could google "constructivism" or "personal construct theory" or "role category questionnaire" to learn more.
It is hard to believe that the number of adjectives in a brief description could be a valid measure of communication competence, but it is.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]OriginalPostSearcher 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sonder_one 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]lambertb 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]sonder_one 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]lambertb 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lambertb 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link