TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sonder_one Archive

View 8 posts and 513 comments by sonder_one on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

A lot of problems could be solved if people rid themselves of the notion that the opposite gender is attracted to the same things they're attracted to.
/r/RedPillWomen21/06/21 09:51 PM
3

Men are judged for their sexual behavior. The standard is simply opposite the one for women. Women are "slut-shamed", men are "virgin-shamed". Overall, men are judged on far more criteria than women are. They are judged on their wealth and careers. They are judged on their physical capability. They are expected to have far more emotional control than women are expected to have. Frequently, they are held responsible for how others feel in their presence. They are held responsible for most everyth…
/r/RedPillWomen27/05/21 07:48 PM
6

Agreed. Former TRP redditors are probably a great group, if you could somehow find them. Among the more useful (in a sad way) stories in the TRP sphere are those of men who have become successful (in many ways) after being unsuccessful in the past. The red pill lesson they preach is that women aren't naturally inclined to be attracted to men who are "under construction", even if the future success is fairly easy to project. Women just aren't wired that way. The early med-school student is just a…
/r/RedPillWomen25/03/21 06:40 PM
4

Men and women both.
/r/RedPillWomen25/03/21 06:35 PM
3

Suggesting that you should go to the TRP subreddit to find a Red-Pill-Certified™️ man is like suggesting you should go to Alcoholics Anonymous meetings to find men who don't struggle with alcohol. The leaders of the meetings are probably good, but the attendees are, by definition, the kind you're looking to avoid. That doesn't mean you shouldn't support the existence of the meetings.
/r/RedPillWomen25/03/21 06:34 PM
1

The feminists will hate you far more for that than the men will. Men have never historically thought of women as sources of income, and that won't change in our lifetimes. That said, there are other symptoms of your issues that could make relationships difficult.
/r/RedPillWomen02/02/21 10:38 PM
1

Translation: 1, maybe 2 men you know suggested that you are intimidating, and now you're obsessing over the idea. Small sample size.
/r/RedPillWomen29/01/21 06:18 PM
4

To be blunt, the MGTOWs are correct to say that on average, it's a bad decision for a man to enter into a relationship with a woman these days. Even a lot of the sidebar content on this subreddit underscores that. The key, then, for both men and for women, is to not be average. Be the sort of woman who's actually worth it for a man (and not merely pretending to be to lock one down), and you can get a long-term commitment from a man who's worth having one from. But both of you have to be better t…
/r/RedPillWomen26/01/21 07:05 PM
16

"and I guess hearing that really hurt him because he said he's never even imagined us breaking up" You guess?
/r/RedPillWomen25/01/21 07:20 PM
8

This is the correct answer. To believe in soulmates is wrong, dangerous, and depressing. If you believe that you're meant to be with a "soulmate", you'll be questioning whether you're with the wrong person every time something goes wrong, and you'll be inclined to feel that you shouldn't have to work at your relationship if you're with the right person, which will make you behave terribly. Happiness is virtually impossible under these conditions; you'll be the ultimate self-saboteur. You'll also…
/r/RedPillWomen09/12/20 02:09 AM
2

If you think being an unattractive woman sucks, try being an unattractive man!
/r/RedPillWomen17/11/20 09:20 PM
13

As u/Zorrgo says, u/Buckley92 is unintentionally confirming a significant Red Pill Truth: Women don't want to see men under construction. Both the TRP subreddit and the wider world are full of stories of men who were rejected by their crushes while they were young, in school, or otherwise building themselves. Years later, these men are accomplished and powerful, and suddenly their old crushes are knocking on the door expecting the man to be thrilled to welcome them back. Men are not born. They a…
/r/RedPillWomen10/11/20 09:18 PM
2

BUT, when I love a man, I will go ANYWHERE in the world for him. The key word is in bold. When a man develops love for a woman, he will continue to care about her long after his reason for being attracted to her (her beauty) is gone. That doesn't mean he won't have any interest in other women, nor does it mean that she can't drive him away by being terrible, but his strong natural inclination is to continue caring for her. The Red Pill axiom here is "Men love women, women love children". This co…
/r/RedPillWomen27/10/20 09:50 PM
11

All men desire multiple women, and all men desire exclusive access to their women. This obviously doesn't work (unless there are 10 times as many women as men in the world). Monogamy is a compromise that works well.
/r/RedPillWomen17/04/20 06:23 PM
-9

If you think unwanted attention is unpleasant, wait ten years and see how you feel about getting no attention at all. Ultimately, you should understand that awkward male approaches are a consequence of the fact that men are required to do all of the initiating, coupled with our feminized, gender-is-a-social construct world that's so hostile to masculinity. It's not your fault, and it's largely not his fault either. Keep that in mind.
/r/RedPillWomen07/04/20 04:59 PM
2

I saw a standup comic once who did a bit on the fact that men will only wear blue/grey/black of their own volition and any other shirt color is clearly something his woman made him wear. Therefore, women who want to prevent other women from taking their men will deliberately dress them in flamboyant colors. The comedian was black, and he wrapped the bit up by going on and on about "canary yellow", and how men don't even know what that color is. So if you see a man wearing a canary yellow shirt, …
/r/RedPillWomen07/04/20 04:56 PM
-3

Actually, many feminists are ranting that some large majority of healthcare workers are women, and thus the crisis is disproportionately harming women. They will always find a way to make it about them. Theirs is the sort of mindset that would find a way to claim that Jews had it better than Germans in Nazi Germany! Incidentally, I have yet to have the opportunity to ask a feminist who's claiming that the female majority in nursing means women are disproportionately harmed what she thinks of the…
/r/RedPillWomen07/04/20 04:53 PM
1

Orthodox Red Pill teaches that men love women, women love children, and children love puppies. For men, this saying is designed to convey the fact that the "unconditional love" that blue pill men expect from women will not exist; women's affection for men is based on their embodiment of masculine traits, which means that affection will disappear if said traits disappear. The harshness of this reality is softened by the declaration that women are not completely heartless, as they do indeed expres…
/r/RedPillWomen07/02/20 05:13 PM
1

There are a lot of men who would beg to differ. I remember a poignant story on TRP from a man whose high school girlfriend dumped him when he started med school (he was poor and boring because he studied too much), partied with rich frat guys, slept around, then tried to crawl back to him just as he graduated as a doctor. It's about perception, and it's highly subjective. The girl in that story made the choices that she perceived to be optimal as she made them. Other women should join men in lea…
/r/RedPillWomen04/02/20 04:16 PM
-1

What kind of engineer, and where? It's possible he's getting exposed to toxic politics that are making him change his behavior. Especially if he's at a big company where there are a lot of mandatory "trainings" that "teach" men to be good blue pills or they'll end up on a sex offender registry. Other answers are good advice; I just can't help but wonder if his environment changed him.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/20 11:08 PM
3

u/blondehairedangel nailed it. It's called discipline. Key to weight loss, exercise, career advancement, pretty much anything. If you're the dating equivalent of the girl who sits in front of the TV eating cheetos all day, you'll get the quality of life you signed up for.
/r/RedPillWomen10/01/20 12:17 AM
1

#3 works wonders: https://medium.com/@AaronBleyaert/how-to-lose-weight-in-4-easy-steps-1f135f7e1dec
/r/RedPillWomen10/01/20 12:09 AM
-3

Two replies attacking me, one from each side. Neither read my post very carefully. In your case, your conclusion was literally my entire point. In the new calculus, it is becoming irrational for men to choose "real women" over the fakes. Much like lottery tickets, this will not be because there are no winners out there, but rather, because the odds are poor.
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/19 08:49 PM
5

Two replies attacking me, one from each side. Neither read my post very carefully. The increasingly widespread perception among both men and women is that women do not provide anything outside of sex in a relationship. What they are capable of providing is irrelevant if they do not provide it. Women who are influenced by feminism believe this and celebrate it. Men who experience these women and their messaging (which dominates the airwaves) also come to believe this. Women providing no value to …
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/19 08:47 PM
16

The porn and robots are a big one. Feminism teaches real women to offer no material or emotional support (that would be one-sided!). It also teaches them that working on their physical appearance should not be necessary, and the idea that they should is offensive. Fat is beautiful, as are the tattoos, piercings, and blue hair (one side shaved). Stunning and brave! So man's perceived choices are: Real woman, who offers nothing but her ugly body and is emotionally abusive. Porn/robots, which are f…
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/19 04:12 PM
11

We can see our future in Japan, where sex is rare and the birth rate is far below replacement level.
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/19 04:06 PM
3

Both genders have a tendency to imagine that the opposite gender thinks the way that they do. That's not how it works. You are a woman. You are hypergamous. That means that your interest in one man comes at the expense of interest in other men. When you project your way of thinking on your boyfriend, you imagine that his interest (or perceived interest) in other women is a threat to your relationship, because it would be a threat if he were hypergamous like you are. It would be an indication tha…
/r/RedPillWomen13/12/19 04:35 PM
2

There are feminists out there who say that ALL sex is rape.
/r/RedPillWomen09/12/19 12:26 AM
1

They somehow turned that into my husband is raping me because I don’t like sex. Are they right? First off, they're feminists, so they're never right. Second, a common lie told by feminists and other similar modern movements is that if you ever do anything that you don't enjoy, you are being mistreated. Think for a moment about the implications of this. Am I being mistreated when I exercise? When I do laundry? When I clean my kitchen? When I go to work? When I wake up at 2:00 AM to feed the baby?…
/r/RedPillWomen09/12/19 12:24 AM
10

Ideally, a man asks a woman out if he wants to ask a woman out, and if he doesn't, that's his way of saying no. A man who wants to ask but is too scared is not much of a man, so nothing to worry about. In our broken world, asking women out has become very dangerous for men, and it's no longer just the timid weaklings who are "too scared." The fear has become legitimate, even for a strong, confident alpha male. It's simply unwise to initiate, so there's room for women to fix the problem.
/r/RedPillWomen05/12/19 06:54 PM
3

You seem awfully certain about the causation in that correlation.
/r/RedPillWomen03/12/19 08:12 PM
5

(As if patriarchy and its restraints on women's behavior existed primarily to make women "happy"!) They don't exist to make women happy, because they don't exist at all.
/r/RedPillWomen03/12/19 08:11 PM
20

What are the self-reported levels of happiness there, if you control for other factors that contribute toward happiness, like financial security, marital status, etc. "Happiness scores" are terrible metrics, because different cultures have different definition of happiness. In some societies, you claim to be happy if you're surviving at all. In others, people default to complaining.
/r/RedPillWomen03/12/19 05:16 PM
5

I read a feminist article years ago that reported the statistic that men average significantly longer commutes than women. The article began with an anecdote about a single mother who turned down a higher-paying job because the commute was too long. Based on this sample size of 1, the article concluded that the entire phenomenon of women having shorter commutes than men was due to women having to turn down better jobs for their families, and was thus proof of terrible sexism. One can only imagin…
/r/RedPillWomen03/12/19 05:14 PM
25

Upvoted, and yet, rejecting a beta provider in favor of a dark triad alpha IS hypergamy. Alpha > beta.
/r/RedPillWomen03/12/19 05:09 PM
2

You're expressing bitterness towards men by suggesting that they ought to have a sexual strategy that suits your interests. Female sexual strategy is not male sexual strategy.
/r/RedPillWomen26/11/19 06:32 PM
1

The man you want does not want to be your beta orbiter.
/r/RedPillWomen26/11/19 06:30 PM
1

"My circles are very liberal so if I had to call the man out for this, I’d just look like the hysterical, overly emotional female." I think you have your political factions backwards.
/r/RedPillWomen16/11/19 12:38 AM
1

And now the site is deleted. Nice work!
/r/RedPillWomen13/11/19 04:02 PM
-6

No you're not. There's tons of stuff that's even more toxic than that on Reddit. It would never be quarantined; to the contrary, it is celebrated. Because it's toxic towards the right people!
/r/RedPillWomen29/10/19 09:28 PM
2

People need to stop saying "religious" and start saying what they mean. Lumping a bunch of very different beliefs together is insulting to everyone.
/r/RedPillWomen18/10/19 08:33 PM
3

That women can't have "meaningless" sex is a red pill truth. Do you think we say these things just to amuse ourselves? "Empowering" sex is a feminist delusion.
/r/RedPillWomen24/09/19 09:59 PM
7

Treating you like a queen, asking your permission to kiss? He is doing exactly what Blue Pill society says he should be doing, and it's having exactly the effect on you that we expect it to have. You said he's very cultured - I'm sure he's very aware of how easy it is for everything he's achieved in his life to be destroyed if you accuse him of something inappropriate. He'll wait for an invitation for every little thing until you make it clear that he doesn't need one. You have two choices: Init…
/r/RedPillWomen20/09/19 09:22 PM
7

Men do not desire the hottest women they can reasonably have. They desire the hottest women, period. Women, and only women, are relative in their sense of attraction.
/r/RedPillWomen16/09/19 10:53 PM
12

You don't have a bad relationship with men. "Men" are billions of different people, and you'll never meet the vast majority of them. At best, you have a bad relationship with a few specific men, but your much bigger problems are with yourself, as others here have said. Fix yourself, then enjoy men.
/r/RedPillWomen14/09/19 12:47 AM
11

People who think that making actively discriminatory games is "progress" are trying really hard to get Donald Trump reelected.
/r/RedPillWomen12/09/19 03:41 PM
1

Whitney simmons Never heard of her, but upon googling, that's definitely not attainable by most women. Face and chest are well above average. Think more like this: https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fkin.mobi%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F11%2Fba-19.jpg&f=1&nofb=1
/r/RedPillWomen12/09/19 03:15 PM
13

Obviously we all love to believe that looks don’t matter (as in genetic, inherited features) but how true is this really? "We all"? Not here. This is a red pill forum. Harsh truths are the main course. The point here is not to waste your time getting depressed over unattainable perfection. The point is to maximize your potential. Fortunately, there's an obvious area of focus: weight. Women who become truly lean and toned are well above average in attractiveness no matter how horse-faced they may…
/r/RedPillWomen11/09/19 10:07 PM
45

Men want sex, women want commitment. The alpha male secures all the sex he wants without offering any commitment. What is the alpha female, then? Quite obviously, someone who has an army of men slaving over her without ever needing to have sex.
/r/RedPillWomen11/09/19 03:55 PM
1

You mean by... not starring in porn?
/r/RedPillWomen06/09/19 05:41 PM
2

This is not a disagreement with TRP. At all. Attraction and commitment are different things. Education does not make a woman more attractive to a man. At all. But TRP never said that rich, successful men will marry the hot waitress. Only that they want to have sex with her. Of course men consider the resume before marrying. But the conversation about marriage never even begins to happen if attraction doesn't exist, and attraction is a totally separate thing.
/r/RedPillWomen06/09/19 05:37 PM
6

This thread reeks of women who don't understand the other side of the aisle, minus a few posts at the bottom that deserve more upvotes. Studies have repeatedly shown that men's profiles are meaningless as to the level of engagement they get online, and that a variety of things that women say they hate are rewarded online. I can't find the link now, but there was a big study once that found that asking a woman something she wrote in her profile was less likely to get engagement, and another that …
/r/RedPillWomen20/08/19 11:15 PM
1

Wrong. Women marry up. Men do not care.
/r/RedPillWomen29/07/19 10:07 PM
3

"B-b-but I met a guy once who WAS intimidated by my career!" "And I know that I care about our relative salaries, so I assume that he does too!" If we could eliminate projection and decisions derived from interactions with unwanted men, this sub might not need to exist anymore.
/r/RedPillWomen29/07/19 10:07 PM
1

"My parents are thinking about moving, and I don't want to have to move away with them." What an odd era, in which a 26-year old would act as though moving with her parents was the default.
/r/RedPillWomen06/07/19 09:08 PM
5

Young women are the most socially privileged beings on the planet. Always have been. Always will be. Being prettier exacerbates the situation. So what do you do with that information? As little as possible. Make the best of yourself and forget about what you can't control.
/r/RedPillWomen17/06/19 08:28 PM
2

It's not so much "not trusted by men" as "resented by men". Either way, it's because he's a threat to steal their girlfriends.
/r/RedPillWomen11/05/19 04:32 AM
14

No appreciation at all for he irony of complaining about "men defining femininity" (which is their spin on the fact that real femininity is the thing that men are attracted to) while at the same time, these women insist on redefining masculinity.
/r/RedPillWomen08/05/19 08:09 PM
1

He finds high-powered women sexy, but I know ‘breadwinning’ tends to be a pretty deep, innate source of satisfaction for many men. He's right. You're wrong. Women are much more concerned about income ratio than men are. Men want to be with hot women, and hot women with money are a bonus. Insecure women project their own diminished interest in men who earn less than them onto men, and feminism makes their message dominant. Don't listen to it.
/r/RedPillWomen02/05/19 05:15 PM
10

Men certainly do want women who are passionate about them. Just like women want men who are passionate about them. But the reason for that passion is different for each gender. I was in a conversation with a radical feminist once. She was a friend of friends, so I didn't want to argue with her, but she was quite insufferable. She was ranting about how certain men she knew (or claimed to know) in grad school clearly didn't appreciate "smart, capable women." I know that the truth of such complaint…
/r/RedPillWomen19/04/19 04:50 PM
18

Someone who is willing to understand him and appreciate him beyond what he has to offer externally. I'll just pick out this one sentence as an example of your problem: You are imagining that men evaluate you the way you evaluate men. They don't. Most women don't really "get" why men want them, and most men don't really "get" why women want them. That's because most men aren't attracted to men, and most women aren't attracted to women. Neither my SO nor I would be attracted to clones of ourselves…
/r/RedPillWomen19/04/19 02:19 PM
6

Two basic possibilities when a guy doesn't initiate: He's not interested. You can't negotiate attraction, so there's nothing you can do. He's interested, but too weak-willed to act on his interest. This makes it unlikely that he'll be a good captain. Either way, you're better off moving on.
/r/RedPillWomen16/04/19 04:36 PM
-1

You misread my comment badly. I am not vilifying women for wanting marriage. I am drawing a distinction between wanting marriage and wanting a wedding without wanting the marriage. The latter is the primary reason for failure to vet. Vetting is a huge part of this subreddit. My comment was very in line with the sidebar, and I'd like it restored.
/r/RedPillWomen15/04/19 07:46 PM
1

This post highlights one of the bigger problems that women cause in dating: They don't want to BE married, they just want to marry. They'll never admit it to themselves, but many women are more interested in marriage as a concept than in the person they marry. The wedding is the ultimate celebration of the female ego. The ring is the ultimate status symbol. The whole experience of engagement and wedding is one giant emotional orgasm, and many women crave it like nothing else. These people pursue…
/r/RedPillWomen15/04/19 06:02 PM
-3

That "if" is a pretty big one. Pornography is pretty widely regarded as unhealthy for men, and I see no reason for women to be different.
/r/RedPillWomen15/04/19 05:49 PM
9

Men are expected to initiate in dating. This is not merely a cultural norm. It's derived from the nature of men and women .There are many things women can do to subtly "help", but women cannot force men to do what they want any more than men can force women. When a man initiates, he takes a big risk. He may experience heartbreak, a serious hit to his confidence, and varying levels of public humiliation (even if the interaction is private, women almost always tell someone). Women contribute less …
/r/RedPillWomen15/04/19 03:55 PM
-3

Romance novels are female pornography. They do for women what porn does for men. They are unhealthy in both cases.
/r/RedPillWomen15/04/19 03:39 PM
72

Women are the more privileged gender, but their privilege is front-loaded. Feminism also devalues women's strengths by insisting that women are losing unless they become more masculine and outperform men according to masculine criteria. At the same time, you should realize that many of the things that you think would be better if you were a man are actually much, much worse for the typical man. Half of men in their 20s are virgins these days, and not for lack of trying. They feel as though they'…
/r/RedPillWomen11/04/19 10:27 PM
7

Why do you think that a "low-value" guy shouldn't be interested in you? That doesn't make any sense. Men are not women. They think much more in absolute terms than in relative ones (disregarding women's tendency to mis-evaluate themselves). If you are beyond median attractiveness, every man alive should be willing to have no-strings sex with you, unless he's personally opposed to casual sex. If you are unattractive, no man will be attracted to you, though some very low-status men may accept you …
/r/RedPillWomen11/04/19 03:09 PM
-1

Men are not women. You can have one or the other, but if you want both you're going to need to try polygamy. Or, you could have friends that meet the needs that your boyfriend doesn't and stop expecting a unicorn.
/r/RedPillWomen09/04/19 05:05 PM
3

Men DO feel worthless if they can't accomplish things. We see symptoms of that all around us. Women contribute to such feelings by having no desire for such men. Remember, I'm not ADVOCATING that any of these things be true. I'm stating that they are. As for feminism, it's helpful to understand that a useful definition for a word is a definition that holds true for things that the word describes and not for things that the word doesn't describe. Calling feminism "belief in gender equality" is a …
/r/RedPillWomen09/04/19 04:55 PM
6

Red Pill is amoral, and truth is truth. That men have greater upper body strength than women could be called misogyny, but it's really just truth. Men's value is in what they do, not who they are. Making a baby is easy for anything with a penis. But a man - men are not born, they are built. All of these are Red Pill truths, but they tend to be talked about more on the men's side, because men (especially the blue pills) need to figure out that sexual attraction doesn't hand itself to them like it…
/r/RedPillWomen09/04/19 03:45 AM
0

I mean that men and women are different. The sidebar can give you a lot more on that. For one example of the unhealthy consequences of a woman using a man like a girlfriend, google the phrase "emotional tampon."
/r/RedPillWomen08/04/19 06:46 PM
0

Boyfriends and girlfriends are different things. Using one as the other is a recipe for trouble.
/r/RedPillWomen08/04/19 04:42 PM
6

Quite the contrary. Women are the only gender that has intrinsic value. Men do not; their value is entirely in their actions. If you are limiting yourself to seeing only action-derived value, it might make sense that you would see women as worthless. You're judging women by male standards, as a feminist would. Don't be a feminist.
/r/RedPillWomen08/04/19 03:36 PM
5

Those things are not feminism. They predate the word "feminism". Feminism retroactively coopted them in order to legitimize itself.
/r/RedPillWomen06/04/19 02:55 PM
49

Feminism is an attack on femininity. It declares that femininity is inherently inferior to masculinity and that women should become more masculine than men are in order to "win" at life. It is doomed to fail because women are naturally less capable of masculinity than men are.
/r/RedPillWomen05/04/19 05:17 PM
3

"Having it all" is feminist nonsense. You have to choose.
/r/RedPillWomen01/04/19 04:54 PM
-1

Citation would help. Where is the corresponding decline for women?
/r/RedPillWomen28/03/19 11:50 PM
0

Yes, mortality rates were terrible. Lifespans wouldn't matter as much so long as people live past breeding age.
/r/RedPillWomen28/03/19 09:39 PM
7

I agree with you. Women do indeed intuitively not want men who were unattractive in years past. We see that trope even in movies, where men who were childhood friends with the fat girl-turned-supermodel lust after her, but women have no interest in childhood dorks who make something of themselves. TRP counsels men not to revisit old crushes after having improved themselves, because women do not reevaluate men's attractiveness, no matter how much it changes. Men who improve themselves should find…
/r/RedPillWomen28/03/19 07:05 PM
2

"stating that we were a bunch of women trying to manipulate men into marriage. " Of course we are. All social interaction is manipulation. That doesn't make it immoral.
/r/RedPillWomen28/03/19 06:46 PM
1

Is Chris Hemsworth repulsive? Plenty of women I know express disgust at the men whose online dating profiles say they're looking for women 22-27 when they're 30 themselves. These women have no clue how many 24-year-old women have profiles restricted to men 28-34. How could they, since they don't browse women's profiles? But it's true.
/r/RedPillWomen28/03/19 06:45 PM
-3

The notion that men who are older and still single have red flags is equalist projection. Such a thing is a red flag for a woman, but men are different from women. Women's attractiveness declines with age, but men can build themselves in all sorts of ways as they age. A man must also learn how to deal with women, which means countering what our education system and society teach him. Men often go from being quite undesirable at 20 to being quite desirable at 35. Asking why such a man is "still s…
/r/RedPillWomen28/03/19 06:41 PM
1

If you're losing to the competition for good men your own age, you can win against the competition for older men. That's why. Given the choice between an older man who's a good captain and a BP loser your own age, which do you prefer?
/r/RedPillWomen28/03/19 06:37 PM
2

"Mens SMV peaking in their late thirties ... does not mean they are at their most attractive." Actually, that's exactly what that means.
/r/RedPillWomen28/03/19 06:33 PM
5

Everyone tries to say that Red Pill doesn't have a particular political affiliation, but the fact is that left-wing people argue that disparities are bigotries even when those disparities are not the product of anyone's conscious effort. It's not just feminism.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/19 04:15 PM
4

Women, particularly those over 30 should be encouraged to date older men. Many already do, but many others are behind the trend. Even-age matches are a recent historical phenomenon. Time was, 30-year-old men were marrying 15-year-old women. Today this seems terrible. Back then it made sense. There was little education and lots of need for kids to do chores, so people matured faster. Mortality rates were terrible, so women needed to start making babies early for society to survive. A 12-year-old …
/r/RedPillWomen28/03/19 03:42 PM
2

I just cannot imagine someone loving me- and viewing me as inferior to them. Or viewing me as cute, or like a "first mate", or as a follower of them. Congratulations, you're a woman. To a man, loving a woman who ISN'T like that seems crazy. That's red pill understanding - that men and women are very different (often opposite). You need to stop projecting your female mindset on men. You're killing yourself. The very fact that you have this problem proves that you are more feminine than you think …
/r/RedPillWomen22/03/19 04:58 PM
1

I no longer have trust in black people. What's the problem? It's the same type of thing that OP said! It amazes me that OP thinks that it's the collective fault of men that she's attracting hookup-types with a profile invitation like that. It's like a guy sending out dick pics and then expecting girls who respond to be looking for romantic walks on the beach and no sex. Which do you suppose is more likely, OP? That all men are horrible, or that you're doing something wrong?
/r/RedPillWomen20/03/19 07:30 PM
1

If your circumstances prevent you from meeting men outside work, then your circumstances prevent you from dating. Either change your circumstances or accept your singleness. If you remain unconvinced, consider the ramifications of trying to date female coworkers if you were a man, and how society would feel about it.
/r/RedPillWomen15/03/19 01:33 PM
14

At least one of these things is true: OP isn't actually that excited about her BF and is trying to rationalize the split and blame him for it. Men earning less than women is a big negative factor in attraction, such that the modern world, with women generally earning as much as men, is extremely toxic to relationship possibilities, and we're all screwed.
/r/RedPillWomen15/03/19 01:31 PM
1

Indeed, projection is a huge problem for both men and women. Women, even many here, imagine that men think about women the way that they think about men. This leads to bad advice.
/r/RedPillWomen15/03/19 01:22 PM
1

SMV and RMV are different things, and TRP does not care about RMV because it recognizes (quite accurately, I'm afraid) that in modern society, relationships with women are largely bad deals for men. As a woman seeking a relationship, you are seeking to become the exception to the rule, which is tougher with men who are capable enough to know how things are. TRP is not going to give you advice on this.
/r/RedPillWomen15/03/19 01:20 PM
1

Another red pill truth is that young women get a ton of flattery relative to young men. This is harmful to their ability to be decent human beings, not to mention their ability to have healthy relationships. You can of course objectively be at the leading edge of the bell curve of intelligence, but if you are, then like a 6-foot-tall woman, you must find a man who's even taller.
/r/RedPillWomen14/03/19 09:18 AM
19

Three things: The most RPW-compliant woman I know (who is unaware of Red Pill) is a "witch with a capital B" (her words) in the office (very successful) and a Disney/teddy-bear girly girl in her relationship. It is doable. It is common for feminist-type women to say "men don't appreciate strong, capable women!" These women are not strong or capable. They are bitches. Men don't like bitches. You can't submit to a man who's not worthy of submission. Vetting matters.
/r/RedPillWomen14/03/19 09:16 AM
-2

One of the sayings in the men's red pill forum is "Women have boyfriends and they have girlfriends. If you're not fucking her, you're her girlfriend." This gets at the core of the subject. As a woman, you have people who are in your life for sexual relationships and people in your life for platonic relationships. You probably don't consciously think of them as masculine and feminine, respectively, but you almost certainly find the men in your sexual relationships to have more masculine appeal th…
/r/RedPillWomen06/03/19 09:51 PM
5

Why are you with him?
/r/RedPillWomen06/03/19 09:42 PM
3

Leave Dubai.
/r/RedPillWomen01/03/19 11:40 PM
-1

Solipsism is not a good strategy. Understanding is. It may be that OP is best served by moving on. It may be that her relationship still has promise. Impossible to tell, from one reddit rant. Either way, RPW as a forum is well served by understanding the differences between men and women, not by getting angry.
/r/RedPillWomen01/03/19 02:07 AM
1

If he looks to her for advice, she should do her best to give it, of course. He's made the decision to ask her; it's already done. If he wants to continue to maximize her attraction and comfort in the relationship, he will maintain strong male friendships and use them when appropriate. She cannot make him do this; it's on him.
/r/RedPillWomen01/03/19 01:51 AM
0

Your last sentence and a half is mostly true, but you're failing to see the conversation from any perspective other than hers. Again, women are the gatekeepers of sex. Men are the gatekeepers of commitment.
/r/RedPillWomen01/03/19 01:47 AM
-2

It may well be dysfunctional, but that's not the question here. We're talking about how a man perceives a situation where a woman says "I love you" and then looks into his eyes expectantly. Is it really that surprising that a man who doesn't have a ring in his pocket at that moment responds by hemming and hawing and trying to avoid saying anything too serious? I've seen good couples break up because one person put awkward pressure on the other without realizing how it looked from the outside. We…
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/19 09:23 PM
-5

I did not say anything about what she should do. Red Pill is amoral. I explained, via Red Pill understanding, how her perspective differs from his perspective.
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/19 07:57 PM
-4

I trust we all understand that when a woman tells a man that she loves him, she's expecting reciprocation.
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/19 07:52 PM
1

The timeframe expectation for sex vs commitment is hardly the same, and you know it. I'm not leaving out any factors. I'm just making a point that you don't like. This is a Red Pill forum, and I gave a red pill answer.
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/19 06:36 PM
-2

Red Pill 101: Women are the gatekeepers of sex. Men are the gatekeepers of commitment. A man "giving in" and having sex is far less meaningful than a woman doing so. By the same token, a woman saying "I love you" is far less meaningful than a man saying it. Women should not expect men to reciprocate every time they say it any more than men should expect women to be DTF every time they're down for it. For many men, "I love you" is essentially a marriage commitment. This isn't surprising, since mo…
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/19 03:59 PM
22

Who set this expectations? Hint: It wasn't men. It was feminists.
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/19 03:52 PM
-1

You are discussing a completely different thing. You are discussing rational evaluation. I am discussing attraction.
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/19 05:04 AM
1

Red Pill is not about what should be. It is about what is. ​ The Red Pill "is" answer is that men value virginity in women because they're evolutionarily wired to want to reproduce, and they can only meet that requirement if they're sure that the children that pop out of their women are theirs. Women, meanwhile, want men with proven competence, aka "experience," to sire and provide for their young. This is one of many areas where the sexes are opposites. ​ This and other recent threads on the su…
/r/RedPillWomen27/02/19 11:07 PM
2

A relationship is more than just attraction, yes. But attraction is a requisite. You are wrong to say that a man in a moment of weakness is only temporarily unattractive. A woman with less of an ideological investment in this conversation presents a fine example: http://archive.is/D9UWh
/r/RedPillWomen16/02/19 02:28 AM
2

That's the blue pill message for men. Here's a recent example of what blue pill men get for their naivete: http://archive.is/D9UWh
/r/RedPillWomen16/02/19 02:25 AM
1

Would your man be less interested in you if you gained 100 pounds and got face tattoos and piercings? We're talking about attraction, not rational analysis. It's subconscious, and it can't be negotiated.
/r/RedPillWomen14/02/19 10:33 PM
9

The perfect age for starting these things is "now".
/r/RedPillWomen14/02/19 07:49 PM
4

That's what vetting is for.
/r/RedPillWomen14/02/19 07:47 PM
1

Imagine a generic man complaining that the supermodel of his dreams didn't abandon all of her other options and marry him even though he did everything right! Do you think she's wrong? Or is he wrong? No one ever said that you can make anyone you want fall in love with you by doing it right. Other people are PEOPLE, not dolls that exist for your amusement. You are not entitled to any particular reward for your efforts. However, if you offer as much as you are able to, odds are very strong that m…
/r/RedPillWomen14/02/19 07:46 PM
5

Men should be vulnerable with other men. Women want their men to be strong enough to handle their problems, and that means seeing them in much the same way that kids see their parents. Invincible! It's a lie, but it's a lie that we need. It's easier to appreciate through other analogies: Military commanders and church pastors do not show their concerns to the people under them. They go to their peers, outside their chains of command / congregations. It is understood that those under them need to…
/r/RedPillWomen14/02/19 07:42 PM
8

Modern society teaches both men and women to view the genders as much more similar than they are. Part of this is simple solipsism - people project their ways of thinking on everyone else. Men and women are meant to complement each other. As a rule of thumb, a woman should NOT be trying to behave in ways that she would find attractive in a man, because it means that she's acting like a man. The men you want aren't gay.
/r/RedPillWomen14/02/19 07:38 PM
3

Hurt and immaturity are often there, but all that is required is selfishness. This rhetoric can be exploited for personal gain. That's all that's needed to make it appealing.
/r/RedPillWomen31/01/19 05:52 AM
53

The nuclear family is a great thing, and desiring it is natural femininity. The issue is political. Everything that is good needs to be made immoral, so that those who are successful (because they do the good things) can be said to have unfairly exploited the unsuccessful (who do not do the good things). This creates an eternal, unmeasurable, never-paid-off debt from those who do good things to those who don't, which can be leveraged (inconsistently and arbitrarily) to demand redistribution. Tho…
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/19 09:16 PM
10

People's conscious behavior will be all over the map, but red pill orthodoxy says that attraction is subconscious and is not changing. How long are these "nontraditional" relationships lasting? Oh, right, I forgot, the non-trads say that "humans weren't meant for monogamy!"
/r/RedPillWomen28/01/19 08:09 PM
2

Love can turn to rage when things go badly. It's the same as women drowning their children.
/r/RedPillWomen28/01/19 05:34 PM
34

Men are more feminine, women are more masculine, and basic truths are verboten.
/r/RedPillWomen28/01/19 05:32 PM
1

Forget IQ - risk-tolerance is where it's at. We live in the safest, easiest society ever, and most of us are far more risk-averse than is logical. We stay in dead-end jobs for fear of risking "security". We don't negotiate, we aren't aggressive, we never leave our comfort zones. And women do this far more than men. It's not just that the bell curve of male outcome is far wider, with more people at both extremes. It's also centered further to the right (successful) side, because risk-tolerance in…
/r/RedPillWomen26/01/19 01:05 AM
2

The feminist who only "believes that men and women are equal" is like the socialist who doesn't want to take anyone else's money or the Muslim who opposes jihad. We're told they're the majority, but we can never actually find one of them...
/r/RedPillWomen26/01/19 12:58 AM
2

"The Confederate flag was about limited government and state's rights, and only incidentally had anything to do with slavery. No one should be opposed to its use!" If you can't endorse the above, you shouldn't endorse "feminism".
/r/RedPillWomen26/01/19 12:55 AM
3

Sometimes the extremists are unrepresentative outliers. Sometimes they are most of the group.
/r/RedPillWomen26/01/19 12:53 AM
0

Are you saying there isn't a companion movement to stigmatize women who prefer confidence, strength, income, or other forms of masculinity in men? Hmmm....
/r/RedPillWomen26/01/19 12:51 AM
1

We are different, and we're not equal. Each individual man or woman is different in a host of ways, and the notion that there is any metric of "worth" by which these differences sum to equality between any two individuals, let alone two groups collectively, is ludicrous. "Equal rights" is a good ideal, and there are many thick books explaining why. Trying to force other types of "equality" has led to many of history's greatest atrocities. Who you are and how much "value" you have is not fixed. Y…
/r/RedPillWomen25/01/19 06:35 PM
3

The term "feminism" originated with what is now called "second-wave feminism", which was about removing the negative consequences of sex, including 1. stigmas against extramarital sex and 2. pregnancy (via abortion). What followed is the "third wave", ostensibly about glass ceilings but in practice, affirmative action for women and the shaming of the traditional housewife. Now we have the "fourth wave", which is about women never having negative experiences of any kind (#MeToo, "not getting that…
/r/RedPillWomen25/01/19 06:30 PM
2

Don't do that either. Your insecurity comes from projecting your hypergamy onto him. Men aren't hypergamous.
/r/RedPillWomen23/01/19 11:57 PM
2

You're flirting with danger here, but a good point to take out of this direction is that a woman should not regard her man checking out another woman to be as threatening as it would be if SHE were the one checking out another man. Women are hypergamous, men are not. A man can do quite a lot with another woman while still genuinely preferring his SO. A woman cannot go very far with another man except at the expense of her desire for her SO.
/r/RedPillWomen22/01/19 05:46 PM
2

No true Scotsman...
/r/RedPillWomen22/01/19 05:41 PM
1

It's hard to argue about something that doesn't exist: https://www.capitalismmagazine.com/2001/09/the-trickle-down-economics-straw-man/
/r/RedPillWomen22/01/19 05:40 PM
13

"I have been told many times that I am too uptight (no kissing or touching on first dates), picky (a lot of expectation), and serious (bring up important stuff like marriage) about dating and meeting guys, hence my being single." Told by whom? Blue-pills? Feminists? Not every piece of "feedback" is correct. You seem obsessed with telling is that you're autistic, as if it's some all-surpassing excuse. Stop doing that. Dating isn't charity, and your attitude is self-defeating.
/r/RedPillWomen22/01/19 05:38 PM
3

You're right and they're wrong. Stand your ground, and let the extent to which they are in your life be their decision.
/r/RedPillWomen19/01/19 06:25 AM
3

Is he actually conservative or is he part of the "rich white liberal" crowd that is very "do as I say, not as I do" in their politics?
/r/RedPillWomen18/01/19 05:49 PM
9

Zillow. You can use it to find a place to live in a nontoxic area of the country.
/r/RedPillWomen18/01/19 05:47 PM
1

"7. Bench press my bodyweight and more" Strength is masculine, but unless you're quite overweight, a majority of adult males who never work out can do that.
/r/RedPillWomen17/01/19 10:54 PM
3

I know a few women who seem to have married quite well despite being beaten with an ugly stick. All are thin, active, and feminine, though.
/r/RedPillWomen16/01/19 03:15 AM
3

Women value facial attractiveness more than men do. For all the talk of men "caring more about looks", this is the area where most women's perceptions are wrong. You project your concern over ugly faces onto men, just as everyone tends to project their mindsets onto the opposite gender. Pretty faces, big breasts, etc do matter, but in our modern "fat acceptance" society, you need to remember two things: If you are thin, you're already in the top half of womenkind no matter how ugly and flat-ches…
/r/RedPillWomen14/01/19 10:49 PM
0

Agreed. What you wrote was my intended meaning. The purpose of this sub is to help women to not succumb to harmful trends.
/r/RedPillWomen13/01/19 04:38 AM
1

Until very recent history, women were always that young (or much younger) at time of marriage, and divorce rates were lower. There is plenty of literature on delayed adulthood and expanding adolescence being a growing problem, but these are cultural issues, not immutable biology. The purpose of this sub is to counter harmful trends. There are a LOT of advantages to getting your head on straight by the time you're 18 (for example, not blowing a fortune on a worthless degree). It's not unreasonabl…
/r/RedPillWomen12/01/19 04:48 AM
-7

That is a very generic study that undoubtedly doesn't take Red Pill theory into account or differentiate between men and women. All it does is evaluate 5-year divorce rates. You can slap the "Science!" label on just about anything, but that doesn't mean the case is closed. Far from it. Most of us wouldn't be here if "beating the average" were good enough for us. The average sucks. Staying married and being happy aren't the same, either. I'm not going to make my point again, because it's still th…
/r/RedPillWomen12/01/19 12:45 AM
0

If the ideal were already being realized, this sub wouldn't exist. But given that this sub does exist, we should be promoting the ideal, not rationalizing against it.
/r/RedPillWomen11/01/19 09:17 PM
6

This post is dangerously blue pill. It is attempting to rationalize delaying marriage past the SMV peak using tried-and-true blue pill tropes like "younger women aren't ready yet" and "I'm so much more of a total package when I'm older!" It is true that many women are poorly suited for marriage while at their SMV peak, but that is a failure on their part, not some immutable reality. The objective should be to be prepared for marriage by the time you hit your peak SMV age so that you can optimize…
/r/RedPillWomen11/01/19 08:48 PM
12

The "Red Pill" is about accepting truth instead of rebelling against it. That's it. What you do with that truth is going to vary. TRP is men trying to optimize their outcomes given the truths, RPW is women trying to optimize THEIR outcomes given the truths. That leads to different behaviors. Also, since the world is so anti-men and anti-truth right now, many men find that being harsh in the direction opposite PC narratives is cathartic, helpful, or both. For example, men predisposed to putting w…
/r/RedPillWomen11/01/19 05:40 PM
3

Nobody, of either gender, achieves that dream. To suggest that one can be a full time parent and have a full time career at the same time is an insult to everyone who's only doing one.
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/19 08:25 PM
3

You are right. You do have little value. And you have a lot of negatives. Anyone trying to tell you otherwise is pushing blue pill nonsense. The advice is still the same. RPW isn't about achieving some absolute measure of success. It's about making the best of what you have. Your best will not be as good as someone else's best, but it is still better than where you are now. Make the best of yourself that you can and use it to snag the best man that you can. What else is there to say?
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/19 04:44 PM
-1

That makes a lot more sense for men than for women. Men need to have interesting lives to be attractive to women. Women can be boring as hell as long as they're physically attractive.
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/18 04:20 PM
5

Poker room is a terrible place for relationship-quality people, but at least you're smart enough not to try to date through work. Find a gym or other active club.
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/18 04:19 PM
2

Online dating tends to fail for these reasons: Both genders are there because they're either terrible at dating or looking for low-effort hookups. Lots of profile lies. Dates sabotaged at the outset by the realization that the real person doesn't nearly live up to the profile. Even if the real person still might have been good enough, the disappointment taints the date. Ego inflation; too many choices. Women in particular (due to flood of options) tend to reject men online who they'd be excited …
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/18 04:18 PM
1

Studies on gay adoptions so far show terrible results. The gay community tends not to dispute this so much as to assert that children raised by gay people are more likely to have other risk factors that should be blamed for their outcomes. http://www.sciencedomain.org/abstract/8172
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/18 05:45 AM
3

https://thefatherlessgeneration.wordpress.com/statistics/ There was a study in the news a while back showing that single-father outcomes are more similar to two-parent outcomes than to single-mother outcomes. The media being what it is, it used the study mainly to mock and shame men, categorically, for "failing to be fathers" for so many children.
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/18 05:41 AM
3

I agree that learning what's out there is important, but there are more ways to learn what's out there than a government school. There's also a time and a place. A young child shouldn't be handed power tools or a gun. Neither should he be put in a kindergarten that teaches him to believe toxic things, in the hope that his parents can correct them after dinner.
/r/RedPillWomen19/12/18 03:57 AM
3

Children can resemble their parents. They can also rebel against them. A lot of the most extreme feminists come from very traditional homes. If you know a government school teaches things you'll want to undo, why let it do them in the first place?
/r/RedPillWomen18/12/18 10:39 PM
3

If this is what is written on RPW, it's no wonder our society is struggling. You were asked how RPW influences your child-rearing, and your answer was straight out of a feminist handbook.
/r/RedPillWomen18/12/18 10:37 PM
1

You're violating several of this subreddit's rules. I suggest you read the sidebar.
/r/RedPillWomen15/12/18 05:47 AM
1

Complaints about this sub not helping men strike me as an ironic play on the fact that feminism constantly demands that men help women (for nothing in return). As for giving men advice in life, there is a place for that, and that place is "When there is zero romantic potential between you." And yes, the better answer is "men should get help from men."
/r/RedPillWomen12/12/18 05:39 PM
50

No one wants socialism for themselves. It's for other people. The same is true of most any other left-wing belief. I'm sure someone will downvote me and argue that "Red Pill doesn't mean right-wing!", but too bad. You're wrong. Whether it's Harvey Weinstein, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, or whoever else, the SJW camp doesn't apply its rules to itself. Your situation is not unique.
/r/RedPillWomen11/12/18 08:52 PM
1

Is it actually OCD or does he just care about something more than you do?
/r/RedPillWomen29/11/18 09:43 PM
6

I can't know everything about every man alive, but I do know that men who have married supermodels have cheated on them. If the question is "will my man not be attracted to other women anymore?", the answer is no. In keeping with red pill theory and other experience, I find it plausible that commitment is a function of RMV, the person's morals, and possibly SMV as well. Do remember, though, that men are not hypergamous, so even if your SMV is the highest in the land, it won't stop a man from cra…
/r/RedPillWomen29/11/18 06:32 AM
2

As others have said, SMV gets you the interview, RMV gets you the job. Either your SMV is getting you the interviews you want and your RMV is too low to get the job, or your SMV is not getting you the interviews you want, in which case either your SMV is too low or your expectations are too high. Based on the original post, I assumed that the last case applies here.
/r/RedPillWomen28/11/18 09:54 PM
2

So you're average, meaning more than half the men on the planet "would do you" (men aren't hypergamous), and you find that inadequate. You're being a textbook hypergamous woman yourself. You desire men who are out of your league and won't settle for less. Your choices are simple: Overcome this, or have it done for you in 10 years.
/r/RedPillWomen28/11/18 08:01 PM
20

Nobody loses 50 pounds. Nobody. It's never been done in the history of the world. It's impossible. ​ You lose five pounds. Five. That's it. It's the only amount of weight loss that's actually possible. ​ Then you do it again.
/r/RedPillWomen28/11/18 05:14 PM
7

assume high RMV is simply not to be had anymore these days Men learn to assume the above through the experience of having repeated bad experiences with women in addition to observing the many symptoms in society at large, such as: The high divorce rate The constant man-bashing in popular culture feminism in general the promotion of female promiscuity in popular culture These factors (TRP term: AWALT) lead alpha males to eschew the search for a high RMV woman in favor of hookups. The rest of the …
/r/RedPillWomen28/11/18 05:10 PM
32

They've learned that behavior. They didn't just invent it out of thin air. And women are the same. Nobody cares about the RMV of a man with low SMV. Nobody ever even finds out what it is.
/r/RedPillWomen27/11/18 10:35 PM
3

Trying to lawyer his way into sex is what concerns me about this person. It's what the blue pill tells men to do.
/r/RedPillWomen26/11/18 08:38 PM
3

Your problem isn't your virginity. It's your career path. The formal education system, and journalism in particular, are rife with indoctrination in things that are contrary to red pill truth and to your chances of being happy or making a man happy. This post is a demonstration of the fact that these bad influences are affecting you. You think, contrary to all reality, that men prefer "experienced" women to virgins. This is ludicrous. Moreover, the source of this ludicrous belief is the identity…
/r/RedPillWomen24/11/18 09:05 PM
1

Usually these "complaint about an event" posts are one-sided in their presentation of what happened, and given the timing of this one (literally moments after the event), I'm guessing OP could have benefited from a cooling off period. I can't support the general animosity towards the BF's lifestyle. Real-estate investors tend to be very self-driven, on the fast track to early retirement or a serious increase in standard of living, and overall have very strong captain chops. I wouldn't advise OP …
/r/RedPillWomen24/11/18 08:59 PM
41

Too many people here are trying to tell OP that she's delusional. She's not. She's taking the Red Pill. Masculinity is in crisis today. Few men have fathers or father figures, and their raised in an extremely feminized world that teaches them to be beta and to feel special just the way they are. If they act against this conditioning, they are given drugs. They are told that they should appeal to women by putting them on pedestals and begging for, then expecting, approval for being so PC. All whi…
/r/RedPillWomen24/11/18 08:52 PM
8

Got roped into one of those stupid "Battle of the Sexes" type of board games a while back, where women and men are supposed to guess how the other sex would answer a question. Question came up about what men are attracted to in a woman, with one of the three choices being "experience." All the blue pill women in the group were dead set on "experience" being the right choice, going on and on about how bad it was to be with someone inexperienced. It was... incredibly sad. They simply could not gra…
/r/RedPillWomen24/11/18 06:36 AM
5

Stop blaming hormones. Stop using "curvy" as a euphemism for fat. Stop soliciting women's approval (this thread's entire purpose). It doesn't help you, and it won't change your dating life. Healthy diet is more important than the other things.
/r/RedPillWomen19/11/18 08:09 PM
0

The Hamster is strong with this one.
/r/RedPillWomen13/11/18 10:59 PM
2

TRP doesn't encourage men to marry at all. It also doesn't tell men what to be attracted to, because they can figure that out on their own. That men are attracted to young, fertile women is biology.
/r/RedPillWomen13/11/18 10:58 PM
0

This is not Red Pill. It's self-flattering delusion. And if your 36-year-old "example" is a real alpha then most women want him. There is no good reason why a 36-year-old man can't have a relationship with a 26-year-old woman. Telling yourself that men in their 30s should prefer women their own age is anti-Red Pill denial.
/r/RedPillWomen13/11/18 10:54 PM
1

CNN just admitted that women weaponize sex, in addition to generally using it to manipulate.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/18 07:08 PM
6

There is no such judge. The reason there had been some in the past is that the Democrats of the past were not like the Democrats of today. But please, keep whining about conspiracy theories in support of a party that believes in patriarchy, corporate illuminati, Russian collusion, and that everything anyone who disagrees with them ever says is a dog whistle for racism.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/18 07:07 PM
2

I've heard of men not liking women who make more money than they do. This is female projection. Women don't like men who make less money than they do, but they don't want to admit that to themselves, so they hamster it as the man's problem. Weak, worthless men may be emasculated by more capable women, but you never so much as glanced in their direction anyway. Most men consciously consider your capability a good thing, and subconsciously don't consider it one way or the other - it's not a factor…
/r/RedPillWomen06/11/18 04:34 AM
1

You want an ambitious, capable man? So does everyone else. You think you need to apologize for it? Ridiculous - this is RPW. You are normal. One of the biggest problems with modern relationships is that all women want men who they can look up to in these areas, but with women earning so much more than ever before, most men are no longer above them. "Equality" means "far too few desirable men for all of the women."
/r/RedPillWomen06/11/18 04:30 AM
1

Yes, women tend to be drawn toward socialism because it is the more compassionate ideology. No, it is the ideology that claims a monopoly on good intentions. It doesn't actually have that monopoly, or anything close to it. The most compassionate ideology is the free market.
/r/RedPillWomen06/11/18 04:23 AM
2

"I'm very accomplished, I have a good career, a nice salary." Nobody cares. No, seriously, nobody cares. These things do not increase your SMV at all, and the fact that you cited them in your second sentence suggests that you don't have a good sense of what men want or how to present yourself to them. You may also be using your career as an excuse for not working on dating enough. Brazil does indeed have an extreme culture when it comes to casual sex. That doesn't mean you should completely abst…
/r/RedPillWomen06/11/18 04:09 AM
2

Men aren't being taught to stay single forever anywhere but on TRP. The reason that TRP teaches them that is that it has observed (correctly) that marrying most women is bad for them. Be the exception.
/r/RedPillWomen06/11/18 04:05 AM
1

Women are the gatekeepers of sex. Men are the gatekeepers of commitment. A man saying "I love you" means a lot more than a woman saying it, just as a woman being willing to have sex with a man means a lot more than a man being willing to have sex with a woman. Sure, there are "loose" men and women who give away the farm for nothing, but nobody wants them. If a man says "I love you" to a woman who he knows feels the same way, he's basically said "I've already bought the ring". Or at least, she'll…
/r/RedPillWomen04/11/18 05:27 AM
3

Perfectionism is insecurity - a reformed perfectionist. It's really obvious in other people. The two women I know who openly call themselves perfectionists have serious issues. And are both single and unhappy.
/r/RedPillWomen01/11/18 04:57 PM
1

Weight is one datapoint. You need more. https://www.thisisinsider.com/photos-women-look-different-same-weight-2018-3
/r/RedPillWomen30/10/18 05:45 PM
0

" I don't want to change myself for men, as I think that'd just make me miserable." Do you expect men to change themselves for you?
/r/RedPillWomen30/10/18 05:36 PM
3

Red Pill is about brutally honest truth. For men, that means a lot of negativity today, as feminism run amok has made relationships with women into a very, very bad deal for men. That's actually one of the truths that RPW need to be aware of and to mitigate in their quest for satisfying relationships.
/r/RedPillWomen30/10/18 05:35 PM
1

I make a lot of money, and my dating strategy must require weeding out gold-diggers. I dress nicely, but cheaply, and my dates are activities that cost nothing, or close to it. I avoid talking much about what I do so they don't get a clue, and I vet them. Somehow, women always seem to get the clue that I'm high value. Dating apps are no good, travel doesn't help (long-distance relationships don't work) - you don't want any of the things you say you can't afford. Becoming a high-value man is what…
/r/askTRP05/10/18 03:18 PM
13

It sounds like you're in a great place to get started doing great things. I'm serious. You have nothing to lose, no entanglements, no reason not to be able to dedicate way more time to a pursuit than I could ever spare. You are a man, not a woman. Men age like wine, women age like milk. You aren't supposed to be great yet, especially with your background. You are supposed to have learned pain. Having learned pain, you can use it as motivation. You actually sound very much like a guy who I met ab…
/r/askTRP05/10/18 03:13 PM
2

This is a tremendously politically incorrect thing to say, but we're on a Red Pill forum, so join the club: Racism can be rational. It is rational to learn from your experiences. If every time you get a job working for a big corporation, the soulless machine crushes you, you won't work for big corporations anymore. This will happen even though there are actually some big corporations that might be great for you. You won't take that chance. If every time you give money to a beggar you find out th…
/r/RedPillWomen23/09/18 05:48 PM
9

Men do NOT care more about faces than bodies. Quite the opposite. It is women who care more about facial attractiveness relative to the rest of the body, because women take emotional queues from facial expressions more, and facial attractiveness influences the perception of facial expressions. The term "butterface" exists precisely because men will sleep with women who have nice bodies and ugly faces. One of the advantages of being a woman is that the areas of your physical appearance that matte…
/r/RedPillWomen21/09/18 08:41 PM
1

SMV and RMV are different, but they are not simply synonyms for "looks" and "character", respectively. SMV is a composition of all of the things that influence the opposite sex's desire to have sex with you, and RMV is a composition of all of the things that influence the opposite sex's desire to have a relationship with you. Education and income tend to influence RMV but not SMV, but "charisma," body language, and the like absolutely impact SMV. And as always, women's SMV is more based on visua…
/r/RedPillWomen20/09/18 11:09 PM
3

Marx correctly understood that communism couldn't work without indoctrination into the collectivist mindset and thus required government takeover of the education system and the banning of alternative worldviews (religions). He didn't change the definition of communism; he just clarified what was necessary to make it (hypothetically) work. It is still unworkable, of course, because it fundamentally violates human nature and can't account for the complexity of reality.
/r/RedPillWomen20/09/18 05:13 PM
3

You're probably conflating physical appearance and SMV. The two are highly linked in women, less linked in men. Men's SMV peaks in their 30s, and if your current man is only less physically attractive than previous ones because of age, then he's probably still higher SMV. You basically admitted this by saying that he has the ability to lead, while the others didn't. That's a huge part of male SMV.
/r/RedPillWomen20/09/18 03:46 PM
7

Men don't give up something that is good. They may leave something because it's not good anymore, or they may try to have two at once, but they don't want to get rid of something that's good. That's good news for women in that if a woman remains good, then her man will want to keep her. Women have a one-at-a-time wiring that causes them to TRADE for a better model. Men fret about this because they realize that they can be discarded even if they perform well.
/r/RedPillWomen17/09/18 10:26 PM
9

This is not the forum for discussions about politics that veer too far away from the Red Pill. I'll engage a bit, but no one else should feel obligated to follow along. I once met a Christian minister who insisted that one could be both Christian and communist. I explained to him that the Communist Manifesto bans religions, and that every implementation of communism ever has banned religion, often executing all followers. He didn't care. He said that communism doesn't actually require that; it's…
/r/RedPillWomen17/09/18 06:51 PM
11

Without feminism wed live in a grotesque society where women are basically slaves. And... there's the problem. That statement is not an attempt at honesty.
/r/RedPillWomen17/09/18 05:17 PM
23

Scumsites never agree to this. It's a way to filter them. Oddly, many MSM outlets (like CNN) don't permit this afaik. But you repeat yourself.
/r/RedPillWomen03/08/18 06:04 PM
3

Be careful what you wish for. Women are attracted to masculine alphas. You say that you're a more "gentle" type? Well of course you are - you're a woman! Discomfort and passion tend to go together. Lose one and you may lose the other.
/r/RedPillWomen19/07/18 07:56 PM
1

And if you do get both, it's still blue pill. Men get blue pilled to death in the education system and need years to learn otherwise. Red pills are either older or uneducated.
/r/RedPillWomen24/06/18 12:15 AM
7

It's called Orwellianism. Feminism is the opposite of what it claims to be. The Nazis described Nazism as a wonderful thing that no decent person could oppose. Was it? Stop feeling like you owe feminism anything.
/r/RedPillWomen11/06/18 02:34 AM
22

And men want naturally gorgeous women, not women who need makeup. Good luck to you both.
/r/RedPillWomen08/06/18 03:43 PM
8

Identity politics and equal rights are diametrically opposed.
/r/RedPillWomen05/06/18 01:21 AM
3

Men offer drinks in order to avoid making an intimidating "big deal" out of a first date. Countering such a tactic with a much larger proposal (in terms of time or financial commitment) is likely to go poorly. Inferring that he's not looking for something serious because he's not proposing to you before the first date or because he hesitates at your overly-aggressive counter offer is you projecting your neuroticism on him.
/r/RedPillWomen04/06/18 09:24 PM
3

You're trying to use exaggeration to absurdity as a form of denial. The fact remains that many men have higher SMV in their 30s than in their 20s, while women almost never do.
/r/RedPillWomen03/06/18 04:02 AM
20

There is a lot of denial in these comments. That some woman might weigh 250 pounds at 22 and 130 at 32 doesn't disprove the premise here. Nor does "I feel better about myself at 32" mean that your SMV is higher. Women are not men. SMV is scored differently. There is no cosmically ordained rule that says that it has to be fair, either. Asking "How am I supposed to accept this" is foolish. You might as well complain about the fact that after about 80 years, you're going to die. "Red Pill" conversa…
/r/RedPillWomen31/05/18 02:12 AM
2

If you can't let go of the need to claim that lifestyle disagreement is "phobia", you're unlikely to benefit from much of the Red Pill. This is not a place for self-righteousness.
/r/RedPillWomen18/05/18 02:51 AM
1

This is why TRP tells men not to do dinner dates. Sitting across from each other and chewing isn't romantic, and it just ends in this awkwardness. The Blue Pill world tells men to let women split the check when they offer or they will be offended, so OP shouldn't be surprised by her results.
/r/RedPillWomen13/05/18 11:24 PM
1

"It's [year]" is a terrible trope that needs to die. It's a logical fallacy; a form of begging the question.
/r/RedPillWomen13/05/18 11:22 PM
1

IF men seek women for being nurturing or empathetic, it would be either because they're looking for surrogate mothers (not going to go well) or they're thinking about children. Many men do neither, because sexual appeal isn't tied to those characteristics.
/r/RedPillWomen13/05/18 12:01 AM
8

I know a guy who is very popular with women and very tradcon, having had several 1-year relationships with women who wanted him to propose. Trouble is, his mom died when he was 11, and while he's otherwise quite attractive, once he gets serious he tries to open up emotionally about that with his girlfriends. They don't lose interest - he's too otherwise attractive (generally out of their leagues). But they do completely fail to give him what he's looking for, to the point where he ends up breaki…
/r/RedPillWomen12/05/18 03:04 PM
1

Anyone who says Person of Size is a Person of Stupid.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/18 01:09 AM
5

The point of the "alpha-widow" trope is that the woman's idealized image of the man she doesn't have is beyond what any real man can live up to. That the man who "widowed" her doesn't live up to that ideal himself is a given. If it were possible for her to move on simply because she is told that he isn't all that, we wouldn't be talking about it. The trope exists because she can't do that. It's subconscious. The solution is to find another man who excites her. The advice should be to get out the…
/r/RedPillWomen11/05/18 09:18 PM
1

Do you behave the same way in the boardroom as you do in the bedroom? Of course not. Your behavior is context-dependent. You can occupy opposite extremes. Your depiction of the choices is also wrong. A confident, dominating man gets more respect from other men (even if he veers in an asshole direction) than a "kind" man does. "Respect" and "liking" are different things.
/r/RedPillWomen11/05/18 08:28 PM
1

I find it odd that on a sub dedicated to two things (1.Red Pill, 2. Advice for Women) that people would embrace the notion that women's evaluation of men is conscious, rational, and infallible. Why do we even need this subreddit, then?
/r/RedPillWomen11/05/18 06:58 PM
1

It is often argued on the Right that the reason left-wing women hate men so much is that their only experience is with left-wing men. I never said that there aren't men who try to nice their way into women's pants; heck, the only thing feminism does more than complain about them is imply that they should do it! But it's still wrong to imply that the feminist narrative applies to all "nice guys". Regardless of whether you're speaking from experience, your post reflected a conventional feminist ra…
/r/RedPillWomen11/05/18 06:49 PM
2

This is feminist rationalization and evasion of Red Pill truth. Spin the "nice guy" as secretly a terrible person, and women don't have to feel bad about their behavior. The reality is that there is no difference between the "sleazy guy trying to 'nice' his way into your pants" and the kind, generous, capable, confident "prize" of a man. Not to a woman's subconscious. She perceives dominance or submissiveness. She craves the latter and turns up her nose at the former. The CONSCIOUS mind desires …
/r/RedPillWomen11/05/18 06:33 PM
25

No. It is a Red Pill truth that women perceive nice men as doormats even when they're not at all doormats, and that men have to adjust. The phrase "chicks dig assholes" exists for a reason. Women are wired to prefer strong, dominant men, and "niceness", even if it's "being generous from a position of strength," doesn't LOOK like strength to the female subconscious. Both you and OP are speaking from an equalist mindset - you have an ideological desire for things to be the same for men and women. …
/r/RedPillWomen11/05/18 06:26 PM
1

Divorce is more costly in your community. How happy are the marriages?
/r/RedPillWomen02/05/18 06:14 PM
26

Exactly. Too many people of both genders assume that the opposite gender thinks like them.
/r/RedPillWomen02/05/18 06:12 PM
15

You're clearly too influenced by feminism if you think that your relative incomes are relevant. A woman's income is meaningless to a man.
/r/RedPillWomen02/05/18 06:09 PM
10

You've just written a post that summarizes the TRP understanding of the world. Feminism has made marriage obsolete, willfully and eagerly, and declared it to be a victory for women. For men, the entire TRP experience consists of learning how much this sucks and how to accept it. Did you think women wouldn't have any pain to share?
/r/RedPillWomen02/05/18 06:06 PM
2

Men do not get emotional support from women. It doesn't work. They should get it from other men. Society tells men to expect it from women, and your boyfriend is reflecting that. He is wrong, and that's a problem.
/r/RedPillWomen01/05/18 05:37 AM
22

Men spend their lives being fed blue pill extremism. To get them recalibrated towards where they need to be, opposite extremism is applied. That is TRP. It's like how women worry that if they strength train, they'll look like female bodybuilders and be unfeminine. The reality is that most women are so out of shape that no matter how hard they're pushed in the direction of strength training, they still won't go too far. TRP tells men what they need to hear to get away from the blue pill. That's a…
/r/RedPillWomen30/04/18 02:01 AM
6

As someone who interviews in the tech world, "we don't want you because you're asking for too much money" is pretty much nonexistent. There are grunt work jobs for which there are tons of candidates and the pay is low, but that's hardly work that should expect better, and nobody's complaining about lack of candidates for those. The areas that are complained about are areas where too few can do the job, regardless of salary expectations. There's a massive skills mismatch problem in western societ…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/18 06:02 PM
1

Every mediocre man is a "good person" who thinks that women ought to be attracted to them because deep down inside, he knows that he's better for them than the men that they prefer over him. Think these men are deluding themselves? So are you, female snowflakes.
/r/RedPillWomen23/04/18 01:23 AM
1

This is the key. Even the upwardly-mobile man who demands a woman with an impressive career isn't actually more ATTRACTED to this woman; he's just making decisions for reasons other than attraction. Men are attracted to femininity. Period.
/r/RedPillWomen23/04/18 01:21 AM
2

No woman who says this is intelligent.
/r/RedPillWomen18/04/18 03:48 AM
4

OP writes as if the entire reason a man ought to exist is to benefit her. This is the essence of the difference between alpha and beta.
/r/RedPillWomen05/04/18 04:06 AM
1

It is difficult to analyze women's sense of attraction because women are more likely than men to date, sleep with, or even marry people that they're not attracted to (beta bucks). You can't assume that these women are attracted to these men just because they're acting like they are. Moreover, calling attention to this tendency in women is extremely politically incorrect. That's why Trump's "pussy grab" comment was such a big deal: there was no implied nonconsensual behavior, but it WAS implied t…
/r/RedPillWomen03/04/18 09:33 PM
–

The other advice is good, but if it's not working you have to consider the possibility that he was never really attracted to you and just used you to break a dry spell. If that's the case, you need to identify it and move on.
/r/RedPillWomen03/04/18 05:11 PM
–

Women care more about faces than men do. Men care more about bodies than women do. Women have the advantage here, since your weight is the only physical characteristic that you can control, and it's a body thing, not a face thing. Have confidence.
/r/RedPillWomen03/04/18 05:09 PM
–

Consider how many feminists are out there telling men "do NOT interpret friendliness as interest, you rapist!"
/r/RedPillWomen03/04/18 05:08 PM
1

If it upsets "feminists and those pro-obesity body positivity people" then it's probably true. Wealthier men are likely to have higher SMV, not only because wealth is a part of SMV but also because the characteristics that lead men to wealth are high SMV characteristics. Higher SMV men can be more selective with women, AND are more likely to have the confidence to say so in a survey. Low SMV betas are more likely to be poor AND to feel like they shouldn't express preference for more attractive w…
/r/RedPillWomen03/04/18 05:03 PM
5

IQ is like height. Women are wired to prefer taller/smarter, and tall/smart women have a restricted dating pool as a result. That doesn't mean they don't have options, nor does it mean that they can't be happy with someone shorter/dumber who excels in other ways, even if the height/intelligence is a drawback. Be careful, though. There are a lot of people out there who think they're smarter than they are, and you could be one of them!
/r/RedPillWomen03/04/18 04:55 PM
4

Unfortunately, it is about impossible to find gun control advocates in America today who will acknowledge that it is possible to disagree with them in good conscience. And that's the root of the issue. If you associate belief in gun ownership with EVIL and with CLINGING TO GUNS AT THE EXPENSE OF CHILDREN'S LIVES and all the other overheated rhetoric, then it will be very hard to tolerate having a person in your life who disagrees. Here's the reality of opposition to gun control: The NRA is very,…
/r/RedPillWomen03/04/18 04:52 PM
1

If the manliest man in the world pulls his white tube socks up to the edges of his cargo shorts, puts on his best Star Trek shirt, pushes up his glasses, and asks if he could please have your permission to buy you a latte, will you say yes? Neither will men be attracted to your feminine "mode of being" if your presentation isn't feminine. True femininity (or masculinity) shows. If it doesn't show, it isn't there.
/r/RedPillWomen03/04/18 04:44 PM
3

Post this same thing on AskTRP pretending that you're a male lacking female attention. You won't get exactly the right answers, but you'll get answers that come from the right mindset. The answer for men HAS to be to improve themselves and/or put themselves in the company of the opposite gender more. Nobody in this world imagines that the answer could be any different for a man. Yet for women, somehow the obvious answer usually goes unstated. I sincerely blame the entitlement mentality created b…
/r/RedPillWomen17/03/18 10:57 PM
4

This. Another very politically-incorrect red pill truth is that men are wired for loyalty more than women. People dispute this because men are reluctant to commit in the first place, or because they may not be committed (yet) to women who think they are in relationships, or because some women can and do do enough to ruin the relationship that the man does bail. But if the man has committed to the woman, and the woman is still loving towards him, a man will have a tougher time dumping her than a …
/r/RedPillWomen20/02/18 12:32 AM
4

There's an old saying that the difference between medicine and poison is the dosage. Men are sick. They've been fed mountains of blue pill and feminism, and the result is that they are unable to be what women want. The medicine, in this case, is extremist talk in the opposite direction of what they have been fed. To someone who is NOT sick, this extremism is poison. For a lot of these men, it's what they need to get jolted in the direction that they need to be pulled.
/r/RedPillWomen19/02/18 09:21 PM
3

Feminism has a lot of flaws, but probably its biggest one is its devaluing of femininity. Men are designed to be big and strong and to work, producing, providing, and protecting. Women are designed to produce and nurture children. Humanity needs both to survive. It makes all the sense in the world that a race should have these two roles, and that they are very different from each other, but also very complementary to each other. It makes all the sense in the world that each piece should desire t…
/r/RedPillWomen19/02/18 09:16 PM
-2

Nobody knows, but the poisoning of our culture has gotten so bad that even here, some people feel a need to virtue signal.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 04:10 PM
2

If all you want are one-night stands with men who can't do better on that particular night, then by all means, keep your SMV low!
/r/RedPillWomen25/01/18 04:09 PM
2

Most men find out quickly enough that most women refuse first dates that aren't in public places. Also, that restaurants make for terribly unromantic first dates. Want to ban bar dates, too? Good luck finding anything left that works!
/r/RedPillWomen21/01/18 08:40 PM
2

That's not a redefinition. That's how women have always defined them.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 05:29 AM
13

Charles Manson had a legion of female admirers who never interacted with him until AFTER he was in prison. This is simply an aspect of female nature that Red Pill communities should be aware (and wary) of: women are attracted to dominance in men. In our peaceful, civilized modern society, it is hard to display or perceive dominance except with unethical behavior. This leads many women to feel more attraction for bad men than for good ones.
/r/RedPillWomen11/01/18 05:42 AM
4

Exactly. Both genders do this. Men want women who are gorgeous despite looking like they're making no effort at all. Women want men who are amazing to be with and seem to have been born that way. The reality is that nobody gets to that point without working hard at it. But make the other gender aware of your hard work? Well, now you're fake attractive - it's all just makeup!
/r/RedPillWomen09/01/18 11:46 PM
-8

You just don't know the definitions of Left and Right very well.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/18 08:34 PM
1

So one guy sees you differently than another guy. Well, stop the presses! If you really want to complain about members of the opposite gender sending mixed (read: contradictory) signals, there's this whole other subreddit called TRP you should check out. Its members seem to have that problem all the time! First, drop the "woe is me" attitude. Second, "clingy" can be awfully similar to "controlling", and "independent" can be a self-flattering way of saying the same thing. You sound like you're tr…
/r/RedPillWomen09/01/18 06:09 AM
6

Forget what you can't control and focus on you. You're four months in. That's too soon to be getting engaged. That he's suddenly paranoid makes me think that he's feeling pressured to move too fast, and I have a hunch that I know where the pressure's coming from. You can't wait around forever for him, but if you pressure him he'll leave. Dating for a year before engagement is a good way for both of you to protect yourselves from a bad marriage.
/r/RedPillWomen08/01/18 02:11 AM
0

It's because you can't cheat your way to fitness. Pretty much any other "achievement" can be bought or inherited, but while some do inherit spectacular genes, for the most part physical prowess must be earned. It can't be redistributed. Those who earn it can't escape knowing that the difference between those who have and those who don't is merit.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 01:32 AM
9

Most of the samples are already too large.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 01:28 AM
10

The patriarchy exists in women's minds. It exists in the form of their need for men to be responsible for everything. Data show us that women are highly unlikely to be interested in or remain committed to men who they view as below their own status, but they need men to be responsible for the resulting restriction of their dating pool. Thus they imagine that it is the men who are rejecting them. I saw a feminist rant once about how men refuse to date tall women. This was a similar projection. We…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 01:26 AM
14

They would never risk their life, pick up a fight or even stand to protect a woman being raped. This sentence is very accurate. It also reflects why TRP is needed. What spectacular entitlement mentality so many women have, that their entire definition of "good men" is "men who surrender themselves for the benefit of women." No woman respects such a man. No woman is attracted to such a man. He cannot be a captain. He is women's collective bitch. What kind of woman insists that men submit to that?…
/r/RedPillWomen06/01/18 08:56 PM
4

They do. And a lot of women provide evidence that they are right. TRP is a community of men who clung to the notion that "not all women are like that" until they had one-too-many experiences with women who ARE like that, and finally conceded the TRP maxim "all women are like that." If you think you're not like that, that's your prerogative. You disagree with TRP.
/r/RedPillWomen06/01/18 08:50 PM
2

These are behaviors of men who women perceive as alpha.
/r/RedPillWomen06/01/18 08:48 PM
1

I'm explaining why many men see marriage as a bad deal, which was the original point. You're saying that in some instances, it can work. That does not counter my point. It is not all or none. Men who have been divorced and do not desire to remarry (and many younger men learning from their example) see that it is in fact very hard for a man to be attractive enough day in and day out for his wife to not lose interest, but if he remains unmarried, then he can end relationships with women who lose i…
/r/RedPillWomen04/01/18 04:24 PM
14

Rollo's article this week quotes a feminist article from 2004 that admits a truth: Sexual harassment is a crime committed by beta-males who think they can get away with alpha behavior. But that is a distinction too delicate for the blunt instrument of the law. How do you explain to a judge why one man’s comedy is another man’s bone-chilling lechery? And can we really expect the beta-males themselves to understand the difference?
/r/TheRedPill04/01/18 04:14 PM
3

TRP answers: First, "proper vetting" is not possible. TRP preaches AWALT, and in a society where divorce is so easy and women are so strongly encouraged to be selfish and hypergamous, even a woman who seems perfect on the wedding day can change. Second, divorce is not the only reason to not get married. Non-married men can get tons of consequence-free sex with a variety of partners nowadays if they're attractive. The "benefits of marriage", meanwhile, have never been less, and women are socializ…
/r/RedPillWomen04/01/18 05:20 AM
46

4 seems to be suggesting that men break frame and show weakness. No. Women don't want men to be "real". They want men to be Chad.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/18 05:11 AM
1

Are you suggesting that when a feminist gets older, she might find out that things aren't the way she thought they were?
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 06:46 PM
1

The truth is the truth. Shooting the messenger doesn't change it. I have some sympathy for the truth of the "women went bad because men allowed them to" argument, but we already suffer from assigning too much responsibility for women's bad behavior to men. This is the RPW subreddit, not the TRP one. Both are about taking responsibility for yourself, not blaming others. The purpose of this forum is hurt by people who sit back and blame men.
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 03:31 PM
-1

Here's a crazy idea: Don't tell him anything. Let him see, nonverbally, that you're not excited about seeing them or about him seeing them, and let him see why for himself when he meets them. He's not an idiot; he can figure things out for himself. If he sees that you feel bad about exposing him to them, you'll probably score some sympathy affection. But if you're overt about bad-mouthing them to him before they meet, you kill that vibe and introduce red flags about yourself.
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 05:06 AM
1

If he's TRP-aware, he should refuse. Even if he doesn't report to you, you have implicit seniority by having been there for a while. Everyone knows you, and he is just "her boyfriend." It's emasculating. What your conscious mind probably won't admit to you is how much your desire and respect for him will decrease when you deal with the everyday "I know things that he doesn't know about our work" phenomenon. The relationship will end with you losing interest in him. You just won't be able to see …
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 05:02 AM
1

I would think the 30-year-old would see more evidence that RP is true, but the 23-year-old would like RP more.
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 04:55 AM
4

That DOES sound exactly like what TRP coaches men to do. And you are here to proclaim to us all that it works on you.
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 04:24 AM
4

Men are not the driving force. They are the symptom. Women are the root cause. Marriage is a horrible deal for men because of women. Women rigged the legal system against men. Women decided that they wanted all of the benefits of marriage to be bigger than ever, while their contributions should disappear completely. They've made a relationship worse for men in every way than a one night stand. What's that, you say? "I'm not like that?" SO WHAT? Many women are, and they're very public about it. H…
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 04:17 AM
2

Weddings are a celebration of a woman's ego. She gets the ring and the dress and the giant party she's been dreaming of all her life. It's a validation orgy. Of course women are going to want that more than men. Some want it so much that they keep getting divorced after a few years so they can do it again!
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 04:08 AM
2

In TRP terms, beta bucks are now mandatory and automatic. TRP has opined extensively on the consequences - a dramatic shift towards women seeking alpha fucks exclusively until post-wall.
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 04:06 AM
5

I can't find the article at the moment, but there have been articles written on jezebel.com and other feminist sites of the form "advice for my future daughter." They advise riding the CC through your 20s, marrying a beta provider after 30, having a couple of kids, and then divorcing him and moving in with a fun guy with money and no attachments for your golden years. By following this advice, not only do you optimize hypergamy, you also end up with three income streams without having to work: 1…
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 04:04 AM
4

It's not just marriage or kids, but everything you might ever do. No one is ever "ready." We just do it. Most statistics on inequality are highly misleading half truths, but it IS true that the richest are further separated from the rest than before. This is not due to unjust policy, though. It is because entrepreneurship pays like never before. With modern technology, you can market and sell globally with little effort. The guy who makes the best widget in Hoboken doesn't just sell to Hoboken a…
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 03:54 AM
5

The purpose of Nazism was to advance and prosper the German people, right? The world is Orwellian - people often claim principles that they do not actually hold.
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 03:49 AM
9

If you've found a way to disagree with a feminist without conflict, I'd love to hear it.
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 03:47 AM
2

The RP view is that men are bigger, stronger, have more stamina, and are less vulnerable to emotional weakness precisely because their role is to do the work (which by definition means having the responsibility/power). What TRP tries to teach men NOT to focus on is the other half of that truth: that women have more value. Throughout history, men have worked to protect and provide for women. They have gone down with the ship, frozen to death in the fields, starved, bled, and died for women. They …
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 03:45 AM
16

An old friend of mine once dated a very athletic, outgoing, successful guy I know. The first date was great and she was really excited and made plans for a longer second date. It was near Christmas, and the guy did some volunteering with sick kids a couple days before (sounds over-the-top cliche, but that's actually what happened) and got really sick. She pressured him to show up anyway, and he did, but he was a zombie and the date went flat. She text-dumped him the next day. Before long he had …
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 03:38 AM
3

That's always what it means. Similar to how "there are no good men" actually means "there are no men that I find very attractive who want to marry me for some reason even though I'm mediocre." The other advice here is accurate. OP wrote a lot of words to say that she has nothing to offer that men want and several things that men don't want. She's restricted herself to a very particular type of Christianish-but-not-churchgoing man who doesn't even seem to have a community that she could find him …
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 03:23 AM
3

Also, regarding online dating, a lot of study has shown that men's physical attractiveness is the only factor that matters in online dating, as women all-but-never initiate and just sift through their inboxes, deleting messages with unattractive pictures without reading them. If you're not such a woman, you probably don't have the SMV of those who are, and the men worth having probably don't want you. For the women they do want, they learn pretty quickly that "status" profiles are never even rea…
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 03:18 AM
5

You are trying really hard to disqualify everyone.
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 03:17 AM
2

Tough question, given how dangerous it is for men to be dominant these days. One of the most respected TRP writers out there is blogging about it recently: https://therationalmale.com/2018/01/02/dangerous-times-part-2/
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 03:09 AM
3

You can't figure out why a woman would maintain a flock of men who give her tons of validation as well as anything else she wants (material or sexual) whenever she wants it? Yeah, that's a real head-scratcher. "It's 2018!"
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/18 03:06 AM
1

I don't use Instagram. Thanks for confirming that it would just be a time sink, since I would start out with zero followers.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/18 08:37 PM
9

You're right, but I don't think the objective was revenge porn. It was dread - the fear of revenge porn in her mind.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/17 03:57 PM
7

You have "just don't screw it up" looks and you think you've got insight on seduction?
/r/TheRedPill21/12/17 03:47 PM
2

She's not the best RPW, but she epitomizes women per TRP.
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/17 03:09 AM
0

No he won't. But if he's got game he can go places with it.
/r/RedPillWomen20/12/17 01:10 AM
2

Do you actually DISAGREE over politics or does he just not get excited about it like you do? You are probably at your peak SMV and still consider yourself lucky to be with him. You have a lot of compatibility and are missing one thing, and it's a thing that's not a deal-breaker, even to you. How hypergamous do you think you can get away with being?
/r/RedPillWomen19/12/17 03:19 PM
13

Just a couple of years ago, smug leftists were telling us that sexual consent was like wanting tea: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQbei5JGiT8 Now, they need to discard their metaphor, because sometimes women say yes to tea, but then change their minds and are too afraid to say so!
/r/TheRedPill19/12/17 03:57 AM
7

The entire Red Pill community is the answer to the title question. If you want a real eye-opener, create a fake male online dating account (or get a man to let you look via his) and check out what so many women think are good dating photos. You'll never complain about the men's photos again!
/r/RedPillWomen18/12/17 11:48 PM
2

This brings to mind a lot of the (very anti-red pill) commentary on the recent "Cat Person" essay. The essay was intended to flatter the female perspective, particularly by ending it the way they did - a transparent effort to kill the notion that the man could be a sympathetic character. A lot of the blue pill pro-female commentary has focused on the woman's supposed extreme concern for sparing the man's feelings. But reread the essay. Not once was her concern reflected in her actions. Not once …
/r/RedPillWomen18/12/17 01:29 AM
1

The short answer to the title question is "yes". However, having a mission does not make a woman attractive to a man in the way that it makes a man attractive to a woman. If you're attempting to attract men with your mission, you may be disappointed, but that doesn't mean men will hold your mission against you. It's neutral. Also, a warning: Attraction must be established before compatibility, or you end up in a nonromantic friendship. Save your mission talk for when it comes up naturally and do…
/r/RedPillWomen18/12/17 01:17 AM
2

This is a troll submission from an anti-TRP woman. The language is over the top, it attempts to paint TRP advice as contradictory, it's super cliche, and most of all, it refers to men as "fellas." "Fellas"?
/r/TheRedPill17/12/17 08:16 PM
12

Time-wasting posts make me angry.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/17 08:29 PM
1

Probably the single saddest thing is the repeated notion that women care so much about how they make men feel. Commentaries on this story keep emphasizing how women "take responsibility for other people's emotions in addition to their own." Bull. Women don't even take responsibility for their own emotions. They just rationalize. They weave narratives in their minds in which they are wonderful people, making their decisions for noble, selfless reasons. Decisions which always happen to be as selfi…
/r/TheRedPill12/12/17 05:54 PM
68

Start with the shoes. That size won't change.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/17 09:53 PM
7

It's the high school girls. They are young and beautiful, like she wishes she still was, and they want that boy. To actually beat them for his affection? There is nothing better! It is a red pill truth that women are more attracted to men because other women are attracted to them.
/r/RedPillWomen11/12/17 06:02 PM
1

This is how men's brains work at the basic level. Nothing about "oh she seems interesting" "she seems nice to talk to." Neither gender is attracted to the other in the slightest because they're "interesting" or "nice to talk to." Sexually arouse, or don't. That's all that matters.
/r/RedPillWomen11/12/17 05:47 PM
2

Women do tend to say things that aren't true, but the amount of gushing they do over "hot" guys who they've never interacted with still counts for something. Not to mention the online dating difference.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/17 03:43 PM
6

Ludacris is a rapper. Ludicrous is his position.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/17 03:41 PM
169

"When you’re 20, you’ll date just about anyone cause it’s just dating." If that were true TRP would never have been created.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/17 08:49 PM
2

There are a lot of women who will imply that men are "bad" for being unwilling to take on a single mother and become a father to her child. Men, particularly TRP men, bristle at this. You were likely experiencing blowback. TRP argues that humans have an evolutionary imperative to reproduce, which includes raising your own children, and that this explains men's innate aversion to women who've had sex with other men, and especially their aversion to raising other men's children.
/r/RedPillWomen07/12/17 02:40 PM
-1

That's not the TRP view. TRP describes behavior as alpha or beta, and certainly some men do more or less of one or the other, but the entire point of the sub is to teach betas to change and to warn alphas not to slip into beta-dom. That there are no "complete alphas or betas" is exactly what TRP teaches.
/r/RedPillWomen07/12/17 02:34 PM
1

That feels like apples to oranges to me. A non red-pill-aware man can still be very red pill in his behavior; indeed, he could be the greatest catch in the world without ever having used reddit and read the theory. Moreover, if a woman finds herself "stuck" with a blue pill man, what are the consequences? A deferential, supplicating partner who doesn't lead or arouse her. But is he dangerous? Is he going to ruin her life? Cheat on her and leave her devastated? Divorce her and take all her money?…
/r/RedPillWomen06/12/17 09:24 PM
0

Very true. Men have never faced stronger disincentive to commit. Nevertheless, others in this very thread have agreed that women have a big advantage in online dating, where behavior doesn't exist and looks are all that matter. In dating overall, they have a much easier time passing the "attracted" test, at least before the wall. After the wall, women are more likely to be limited to blue pill men or, if they're lucky, formerly-blue-pill men who had crushes on them years ago. I know a very athle…
/r/RedPillWomen06/12/17 06:31 AM
2

Roissy would be proud, but this subreddit is about sexual strategy.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/17 06:16 AM
0

"Comedy genre?" Talk about a niche... That women play AF/BB is TRP 101, but TRP wouldn't exist if not for a legion of men complaining about how miserable it is to be the BB. To be the AF, a man must be seductive. It is possible to do this by means other than looks, but don't let that fool you into thinking that men have it easier than women. Here's an old goody from TRP-land: https://imgur.com/UvOJZv5. Women are not able to be attractive to men if they fail the looks test, but passing the looks …
/r/RedPillWomen05/12/17 10:31 PM
2

Men are bombarded with the message that it's NOT ok to reject a woman for being physically unattractive. This is one of the biggest blue pill myths that they need to overcome.
/r/RedPillWomen05/12/17 08:35 PM
-1

Women are not ignorant of their physical decline, but they are ignorant of the Red Pill realities that accompany that decline. The biggest one is the general improvement in men's SMV as they enter their 30s. Women in decline tend to assume that the male market isn't changing, but it is. The wall really hits when a woman decides to return to an old "not good enough" boyfriend only to find that he doesn't want her anymore.
/r/RedPillWomen05/12/17 08:33 PM
3

There are no METOO "survivors."
/r/TheRedPill05/12/17 12:35 AM
2

Men have good reasons (paternity) for preferring women with lower counts, while women prefer men with "experience". OP sounds like an apologist for "slut shaming", but slut-shaming is women's fault.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/17 11:30 PM
-4

Any time you begin a comment with "I don't understand", it means that the problem is you. Your ignorance is not other people's failing. If you truly had an argument against something, you would say "I understand, and here's why you're wrong." Since you seem to have the understanding of this issue that a left-wing blog wants you to have, rather than an accurate one, here's but a part of a better understanding: http://www.dailywire.com/news/24004/everything-you-need-know-about-why-net-neutrality-h…
/r/TheRedPill01/12/17 10:35 PM
17

Rollo Tomassi defines a woman's SMV peak as age 23, but the wall is still pretty widely defined as age 30, where the decline is significant enough to change a woman's strategy because the power dynamics flip.
/r/RedPillWomen01/12/17 06:11 AM
4

TRP teaches men something that life beats them over the head with otherwise: If you start out trying to test or build compatibility with a woman before creating ATTRACTION, you are friend-zoned for life. The same is true for women. You want intellectual compatibility? Fine, but he needs to be attracted to you FIRST or you'll never be more than friends. Try seductive humor next time.
/r/RedPillWomen30/11/17 07:46 PM
1

Marriage and children are not goals of TRP. A significant subsection of the community insists that men should never pursue either one, because it's disadvantageous to do so. The goal of both TRP and RPW is sexual satisfaction. That's it. It is possible for both men and women to get what they want together. It is also possible for one to be happy and the other not to be.
/r/RedPillWomen30/11/17 07:40 PM
3

Try browsing women's online dating profiles sometime. An absurdly high number of them talk about how much they love watching football. In my experience, most women who claim to be big football fans just say they love whatever team their dad or boyfriend likes, and don't ever watch games. They're just saying what they think it appeals to men. Similarly, men are bombarded with the notion that they should appreciate women for their brains or their personality or whatever, so they eschew seduction a…
/r/RedPillWomen30/11/17 07:36 PM
4

This circulated on TRP a while back. It's a summary of a long study on characteristics of women and their impacts on divorce odds. It has unkind things to say about premarital sex: http://freenortherner.com/2013/06/21/sexonomics-odds-of-divorce/.
/r/RedPillWomen30/11/17 07:29 PM
2

If we play along, what's your solution?
/r/TheRedPill30/11/17 05:51 AM
9

I'd rather talk about his sequel, "The Truth", in which he claims to spend the entire book banging incredible women while behaving like the wimpiest beta ever. Social proof must be even stronger than I thought.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/17 05:50 AM
4

I don't know where this idea that it's Red Pill to believe that looks don't matter is coming from, but take it from a guy who spent the first 28 years of his life walking with a limp and in terrible pain before finally finding a surgeon who got it right: You can't learn ANYTHING about women if you looks are an immediate deal-breaker, because no amount of frame can make them evaluate your words and actions as if they're coming from an actual potential mate. And needless to say, you won't be havin…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/17 05:48 AM
10

Men are given terrible information and worse feedback as to the hows and whys of dating, so you should expect a lot of "I did it right; why isn't it working?!?" sort of frustration on their part. This leads to a conflict between individual and collective good. For you yourself, it's best to ghost and avoid the drama. For society as a whole, men get ghosted a ton and that can have wider negative consequences in terms of their behavior. It would be good to find a way for them to gain useful feedba…
/r/RedPillWomen29/11/17 06:48 PM
0

This is a sexual strategy subreddit. The goal is not to beat crossfitters at sports. The goal is to succeed with women. A more muscular guy may not beat the crossfitter in a triathlon, but he'll appeal more to the girl. Remember, as a general rule, what women are attracted to in men are not useful life skills. That's why game/frame have so much value.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/17 08:29 PM
5

Feminism is an enemy of all men because feminism chooses to be an enemy of all men. We can't simply wish that away. We must deal with it as it is. It's not hate to oppose hate groups.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/17 04:48 AM
-3

TRP is supposed to be about telling the cold hard truth as opposed to flattering lies. This post (which does NOT say that "it's all about looks") is telling a cold hard truth. The notion that "hard work" can trump genetic privilege is Disney, not reality. It has a place in TRP. It's only part of the story, but denying reality is still denying reality.
/r/TheRedPill22/11/17 05:19 AM
2

Congratulations, you have a top 10% face.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/17 02:13 PM
1

Honestly, this subreddit is going to shit. Nobody reads ANYTHING; they just show up to troll people who submit posts. That's what 90% of the comments on every post are nowadays. You didn't read. This post wasn't about how to get laid. I said several times throughout that game overcomes everything written here. The point of this post was to critique the misapplications of "80/20" that other people have, and to improve people's understanding of the difference between how men score men and how wome…
/r/TheRedPill20/11/17 06:21 AM
-1

What it isn't is an internet tough guy / troll who just hates on every post without reading it.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/17 03:19 AM
104

Feminists' "strong woman" talk blows up in their faces, as a world full of betas listen to them and start trying to appreciate women for their strength, thus failing to be the daddy and acting too much like the son. Or at best, the peer. Women don't want men who are their equals.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/17 12:40 AM
1

Read the comment that you replied to.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/17 09:26 PM
1

TRP would be a much better forum if people actually read posts before responding instead of just trolling.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/17 06:21 PM
3

Then you have a combination of facial attractiveness and numbers game (more women, fewer men) that I don't. Good for you. My point is that even TRP-aware men have easier expectations than they should regarding the extent to which women will pursue men without game.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/17 06:19 PM
2

By being a dedicated lifter since high school. The gains were slow, and it pissed me off that other guys got more with less work, but I was determined.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/17 06:17 PM
-4

As I said, "Anything less and you will NEVER get flirted with, or even glanced at, unless YOU initiate with SOLID GAME."
/r/TheRedPill19/11/17 05:18 AM
5

My old oneitis is much fatter and older now, and her friends keep pressuring me to start something with her, even though they know she hated me years ago. Women are gonna woman.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/17 09:07 PM
2

This video should be mandatory watching for every feminist. Then after she watches it, you ask her what she thinks of it, and she'll say that it epitomizes toxic masculinity, with all its catcalling and other "street harassment." Then you explain to her that there are millions of men in this world who respect women tremendously and would never do any of the things that feminists complain about, and that there's a special name for this type of man: virgin. This video is the reason for everything …
/r/TheRedPill18/11/17 09:04 PM
10

Ironically, feminism affirms this, claiming that the idea that a woman could "cheat" is sexist, because it implies that men own women. Nevermind that oftentimes a commitment has been made, and nevermind that they will still surely complain about men cheating. Sometimes women are honest. Just not when they mean to be.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/17 01:07 AM
2

Notice how nowhere in that entire article do they explain why anything TRP says is wrong.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/17 05:17 AM
1

A feminist criticizing another community for deleting views that don't conform to the local theology? You don't say.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/17 05:17 AM
1

By women, are you referring to those whose preferred strategy leaves them alone and miserable after they hit the wall, lamenting that they passed up good men when they had the chance to lock them down?
/r/TheRedPill07/11/17 09:55 PM
31

Nobody loses 50 pounds. It's never been done in the history of mankind. You lose five pounds. Five. Eat better, a bit more exercise every day. Small, but noticeable changes, carried on for a few weeks. And you lose five pounds. Then you do it again.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/17 04:06 PM
1

Because the vernacular doesn't.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/17 02:03 PM
4

But the kids are alt-right: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/449373/angela-nagles-kill-all-normies-explores-alt-rights-roots-rise The millennials, now they're done.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/17 02:03 PM
4

Capitalist? This sort of thing is the literal antithesis of free market. There's a reason that the Communist Manifesto demands that the state take control of all education.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/17 02:02 PM
1

The less true something is, the more "education" is required to believe it.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/17 02:01 PM
2

Women think with their emotions. That's how game works on them. It's also why societies where women choose the LTRs experience a lot more divorce and unhappiness. AF/BB is bad for society.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/17 04:13 AM
14

The definition of "troll" is not "someone I disagree with."
/r/TheRedPill31/10/17 04:08 AM
30

Sounds like the plan worked until he went off script, so I think I'ma try it. Where do I find this horde of beautiful women to follow me around wherever I go and make countesses jealous with? Amazon Prime?
/r/TheRedPill30/10/17 12:33 AM
-2

Women teach men TO rape. Being beta is punished, being aggressive is rewarded.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/17 05:56 PM
61

You know she's writing a post in TwoX right now about how her boyfriend has mommy issues.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/17 02:30 AM
-5

Women are aroused by emotion. Period.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/17 01:55 AM
38

Victimhood is the currency of socialism. Know where people around you stand, and associate accordingly.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 11:37 PM
3

More costume ideas would actually be great. Halloween parties are where the women will be at next weekend.
/r/askTRP19/10/17 10:35 PM
10

One of the criticisms that right-wing people have levied against left-wing people for generations is that they use the passive voice to refer to people's suffering the consequences of their bad behavior. Got fired for doing something terrible? "Got laid off." Blew all your cash on drugs? "Card got denied." Stabbed somebody? "The knife went in." The Left has always called these criticisms "blaming the victim." Now, all of the sudden, it suits them to notice.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/17 10:28 PM
6

" rather than how many men and boys impregnated teenage girls" So now all teenage pregnancy is nonconsensual sex? Or do (wait for it)... WOMEN HAVE NO AGENCY?
/r/TheRedPill18/10/17 10:25 PM
12

I got it from the facebook posts of two feminist acquaintances of mine. And, unfortunately, a lot of other women who are mutual friends of ours and "liked" the posts. You ask that we be quite stupid indeed to believe that this is about "awareness" when the political Left (and feminism in particular) have such long, repeated histories of using "victimhood" in this manner. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me.... how many times are we up to?
/r/TheRedPill18/10/17 04:45 AM
22

A girl I wanted nothing to do with grabbed my junk in a club once. Total random passer-by. Know what I'm doing about it? Not implying that all women everywhere owe me reparations. That's what I'm doing about it. That makes me better than the "Me Too" crowd.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 11:06 PM
9

No, no, no. It's not just simple attention-whoring. It's much more than that. First, the official claim is that it's about "raising awareness" of the "magnitude of the problem". As if there are people out there who aren't already aware that when you define "sexual assault" so broadly that it includes "looked at me", every woman is a "victim." Or that when women eschew men who don't escalate physically and reward animal assertiveness, the consequence of their incentivization won't include some un…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 11:04 PM
25

Subconsciously feeling something is not the same as consciously knowing it.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/17 10:45 PM
23

How to be masculine while eating Cheetos: Don't eat Cheetos.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/17 07:44 PM
1

You missed my point badly if you think that I'm personally condemning these men. Not at all. I'm pointing out that women's judgment is very different from men's. I happen to think that it's horrible by comparison, but TRP isn't about judging; it's about knowing.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/17 03:53 AM
1

I can't disagree, given that by female standards, 80% of men are below-average looking, and these guys tend to occupy the 50-80% range (some serious fitness nuts, but not great genetics). But being "boring" is still a big factor.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/17 06:09 PM
1

Part of it is the very beta culture - just read any news about Facebook or Google (the companies) these days. Startup land is worse. A common thing is conventions called "Startup Week" where there's a week of talks advising startups and doing case studies, but the last few years they consist entirely of "How to be more SJW" talks - nothing at all to do with software or business! But the other part - and this really needs to be understood - is that being disciplined and organized and structuring …
/r/TheRedPill14/10/17 06:06 PM
1

Right, if we just had more socialism, that would make women want men more!
/r/TheRedPill14/10/17 05:34 PM
1

I haven't tracked any of them over a 30-year period, so I can't answer. But they seem much more submissive than the white wives at the moment. And I should clarify, I've worked at five different companies of various sizes, and observed this stuff at all of them.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/17 05:25 PM
1

Physically attractive betas will date uggos. Or fatties. We all know this. And many of these guys are more "average-looking." Not ugly. Not fat. Intelligent and capable. But average-looking, and very beta, so their "merits" are worthless in the SMP. The #3s could probably pick up hairdressers at Great Clips and women of Walmart, but they won't go that low. They demand HB5s, but they're too "boring" to pull them. They open by talking about something "fascinating", and it IS INDEED FASCINATING, if…
/r/TheRedPill14/10/17 05:24 PM
2

I can believe that Utah's demographics make that work. I was not describing Utah.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/17 05:20 PM
34

As a software engineer in a climate of people earning well into 6 figures, I can assure you that while women are absolutely hypergamous, they still prefer bad boys to rich career men with their lives together (AF/BB). There are three types of "relationship status" for a high-earning software developer: Married/dating ugly, white harpy. Extremely needy, demanding uggo keeps his balls in her pocket, and he's her extraordinarily blue-pill bitch. A LOT of these women "decide to quit working" after t…
/r/TheRedPill14/10/17 02:04 PM
16

Gee, if only women weren't hypergamous, such that the A men didn't need to settle for B women and the B men didn't need to settle for C women.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/17 01:47 PM
2

A lot of kids are contemptuous towards school and teachers, to the point of bullying teachers.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/17 02:20 AM
1

Here's a thought: What if you were a health nut who lifted and ate well, and part of that meant that you cooked better than her. And then... she had to do the cooking in your relationship because you're so busy with your career and lifting and generally being awesome that it didn't make sense for you to cook. And then... she felt pressure to have her cooking meet your standards, a la Gordon Ramsey. Now how's the power dynamic?
/r/TheRedPill14/10/17 02:19 AM
2

Shorter and more correct: Leftists cite "nuance" or "shades of grey" as if simply saying those words makes solid rational arguments against their ideology disappear. It's an insta-win for them, in their minds. Vagueness as a concept is not an argument. If you can't explain what the shades of grey ARE or how they invalidate the argument against you, then you haven't made a point. You've actually conceded.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/17 08:01 PM
1

Posted as a comment to avoid polluting the headline: Takeaways include: 1. Don't try to blue-pill rationalize your way into her pants. It's pointless. 2. Make her feel and you win. 3. When you win, you get to do things that losers can't do. Not just the obvious, but also all sorts of other things unrelated to sex. You're not creepy or misogynist anymore; you're "funny"! Even though you're the same person. 4. If you lose, it could be failed game. It could also be that her puppy died that day and …
/r/TheRedPill01/10/17 03:36 AM
14

What Hefner illustrates is that women do not rationally evaluate. They emotionally evaluate. What they hate from one man, they love from another, because they don't actually care about words or ideas. They care about feelings. Hefner gave them feelz. Now the hamster has to explain why he's amazing while other men who echo him are "creeps". The hamster has no trouble with this; it's been doing it for a long, long time.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/17 02:46 AM
4

Of course I see the issue. I said in my first post that I see the issue. That's why I explained how both sides are partly right, but can be wrong. There's a positive way to take the reality that you can't be LeBron, too. That's to not let failure to be LeBron take you away from what you CAN do and what you HAVE achieved. Perfectionism is toxic.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/17 11:28 PM
21

The reason this argument goes back and forth interminably is that both sides are right (mostly), and they see contradiction where none exists. The Red Pill is literally about telling the cold, hard truth, not about what you do with the information (where people disagree). Red Pill truths include the fact that lifting, game, style, frame, etc all boost SMV. They ALSO include the fact that physical characteristics matter, with facial attractiveness, height, and yes, skin color all being factors. T…
/r/TheRedPill26/09/17 10:23 PM
13

Shapiro is representative of real people on the right. If that surprises you, you should make an effort to broaden your exposure.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/17 04:28 PM
1

Women act according to their perception, which is usually far away from reality. They are intensely emotional, hormonal, insecure, irrational creatures. Otherwise known as children. Learning to manipulate their emotions to your advantage is something you need to do, at least sometimes, to get what you want in life, but you can't manipulate every woman at every moment, so when you don't, remember how little her perception has to do with your actual value.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/17 02:25 PM
3

Agreed. Is this subreddit called "Red Pill Women" because it exists for women to demonstrate to men that the Red Pill is correct?
/r/RedPillWomen14/09/17 11:50 PM
4

Don't kid yourself. Women are extraordinarily shallow creatures. They just favor different things. This is among the most fundamental Red Pill truths that men have to learn.
/r/RedPillWomen14/09/17 11:49 PM
2

Red Pill men seem to be way ahead of women on this: Do NOT attempt to meet other Red Pill people via the internet. We live in the age of doxxing, and there are a lot of people who would gladly ruin your life if they knew you were a part of this community. Censorship is already a big problem. Red Pill truth is very politically incorrect!
/r/RedPillWomen14/09/17 11:41 PM
1

Try online dating just to see if you get options. If you don't, then you are WELL BELOW AVERAGE LOOKING, and you need to stop lying to yourself. Like most men, your only hope may be to physically train until you are in far better shape than most people so that your body overcomes your bad genetics. If you DO get dates, go on a few so you get it out of your system. It's highly unlikely you'll find anything great because online dating sucks, but the practice will get you past this hump you're stuc…
/r/RedPillWomen14/09/17 11:37 PM
1

Do they care if she likes it? Maybe the first time, but once they learn Red Pill truths it's "get yours and get out." And if they aren't Red Pill, they're probably having less sex.
/r/RedPillWomen14/09/17 11:34 PM
1

The stock Red Pill Men's answer: From an evolutionary standpoint, our imperative is to propagate our DNA. Men need to know that the children that they are protecting are theirs, so they want women without other partners. Women, by contrast, want men with proven capability (aka "experience"). Men have further observed that women with higher counts have steadily declining faithfulness, whereas women seem to subconsciously perceive men with history/options as more desirable and expect them to be be…
/r/RedPillWomen14/09/17 11:28 PM
2

The fact that that's even possible for you is the single greatest gender privilege in Western Civilization. Everyone here should appreciate that.
/r/RedPillWomen14/09/17 11:18 PM
6

A lot of truth there. Add this: "Dating" today is about sex. Sex first, sex last, and only sex. There is no exploration of LTR potential until after sex. Some people know this and like it. Many others don't, but it's still true for them. Cultural influence and group think (particularly among women) being what it is, EVERYONE'S emotions are attuned to this manner of being "turned on." Remember, 50 Shades of Grey sold particularly well among self-identified Christians. Your most pious church girl,…
/r/RedPillWomen14/09/17 11:14 PM
1

Men have an innate desire to be able to please women. That's one of the reasons why there are so many beta "nice guys" out there. If you show unhappiness, the man feels like he's failed, in much the same way that parents are unhappy when their toddlers are unhappy.
/r/RedPillWomen14/09/17 10:55 PM
11

She shit-tested you and you passed. You were never in the friend zone. At best you can be credited with dodging the friend zone. Escaping it is a whole different animal.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 05:53 PM
1

You are reaching. Attempting to hamster-rationalize in the manner of a feminist. Sure, you can find a guy who is like you describe if you try hard enough, but the majority case - the case that is relevant here - is that guys are genuinely nice and women are genuinely not interested in them BECAUSE they are nice. It's not about "ulterior motives" or "pretending to be nice to get in their pants." Women are genuinely repulsed by being genuinely treated well by genuinely good men. They just hamster …
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 05:48 PM
11

Amen. My old oneitis has hit the wall since I found this place. Desperate, 20 pounds heavier, not physically attractive to me in the slightest anymore, and whining to anyone who will listen about "gonna die alone." She dug her grave.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 05:19 PM
2

The notion that "regulation" combats monopoly abuse has never had any basis in fact. Monopoly abuse can only happen when government plays a role. "Regulation" CAUSES the problems that its advocates claim to be solving.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/17 08:39 PM
5

Agree and disagree. It is true that most girls are in the grey area between yes and no. Not necessarily because they're unsure about you OR because you have wiggle room to win or lose with your "game" (as much as people here flatter themselves) but because women are fantastically insecure, and saying EITHER yes OR no is hard for them. This gives you the chance to decide for them. However, this does NOT mean that you should "play it safe". Women crave feelz, and they get TONS of attention from to…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/17 12:02 AM
1

You need to read the Wealth of Nations. It's literally the starting point for a conversation like this. The idea that those in power use the state to protect themselves from competition is THE PRIMARY reason why state management of trade is bad.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 11:54 PM
3

Getting a genuine female wing, as opposed to a cockblock or other form of saboteur, is the tough part. The simple reality is that a man capable of getting a female wing doesn't need one.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 11:51 PM
3

Women DO get tons of attention merely for existing. Even the ugly ones. That's been repeated ad nauseum, and for good reason. They are "screwed" only in the sense that they don't get the happiness that they expect as a consequence of their own behavior. That's hardly comparable to men, who can suffer quite a bit for doing well, but not well enough. As for the notion that there are more highly attractive women than highly attractive men, that's because a "great man" must have great physical appea…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 11:49 PM
2

Ok, I haven't been to a TRP sub in a while, but things sure seem to have degraded here. Only one attempt at answering the question, flanked by a bunch of useless personal attacks. I never said nor implied that I'm doing other things, and I lift regularly. None of that has anything to do with the question, though. Solo pickups at a bar? Really? That's TRP advice now? Why does this sub exist if no one actually answers the questions?
/r/askTRP03/09/17 06:22 PM
4

Their lingo, obviously. I was being rhetorical. Maybe I'll use quotes next time if it offends you so badly. Or you could grow a pair, deal with it, and either provide a useful answer or GTFO.
/r/askTRP02/09/17 09:28 PM
6

Recently vacationed in Germany and wondered if any of the people I chatted up would bring up Trump. They did, but only in this way: Them: Your political correctness in the States is crazy! Me: [agrees] [discussion ensues] Them: I can see why people voted for Trump.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/17 10:19 PM
1

You're moving the goalposts. The original point was that women have control in relationships between men and women. Whether they become happy as a result of their control is a question of their competence, not a question of whether they have control. Whether having control or happiness is better is irrelevant to the question of who actually HAS control NOW. Who has control outside of relationships is also irrelevant to the topic at hand. You are attempting to undermine the claim that women have …
/r/TheRedPill29/08/17 08:59 PM
1

You used the fact that women are unhappy as evidence that they're not in control. Ludicrous. They're unhappy because they misuse power, not because they lack it.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/17 12:50 AM
1

You misunderstand. The article claimed that a person who uses a bunch of synonyms to describe a person is a good communicator while someone who doesn't repeat himself is a bad one. That was the sample near the bottom. I find that asinine. I was not referring to your post as a whole.
/r/seduction23/08/17 03:36 AM
1

he proved looks don't matter. No one can prove that, because it isn't true. You can overcome a handicap, but that doesn't mean that it's not a handicap. I have attractive friends. I have seen the way women approach THEM, initiating and overtly flirting. No such thing ever happens to the average man.
/r/RPChristians23/08/17 12:00 AM
2

This all leads to another important RP observation: Women are not egalitarians. The Bible says that to freeze out your spouse is wrong, and a man doing it to his wife would be guilt-tripped about it. But you can't do it to a woman.
/r/RPChristians22/08/17 11:50 PM
1

I've been that guy. And let's all observe, for the record, that women regard HIS behavior as unethical. He's "pretending to be her friend to get in her pants", and that's all there is to it. Even though his "pretending" is genuine affection and is as real as any love could ever be. No matter what she does, they would never consider her to be immoral in the least. They can't. Women have no agency; men are always at fault.
/r/RPChristians22/08/17 11:48 PM
1

It's not a contradiction or a hypocrisy. Red Pill isn't about fixing the world; it's about making the best of it. PND is practiced because CC will happen regardless of whether you participate in it, so you might as well. That's the theory. As for RP being high on information and low on solutions, THAT'S THE POINT. Even going back to the original Matrix analogy, the Red Pill isn't about offering solutions. It's about getting the information right. The notion that Red Pill men will be "no better t…
/r/RPChristians22/08/17 11:27 PM
1

Because men are raised by women and drowned in feminist-speak, and women tell the opposite of the truth about this stuff. Witness literally every woman ever complaining that the men don't give her ENOUGH attention.
/r/RPChristians22/08/17 11:13 PM
1

TIL that vomiting up redundant word diarrhea makes you a "better communicator".
/r/seduction22/08/17 11:02 PM
2

It makes me sad too, but it's still better to know the truth than to deny it. That's why it's called the Red Pill.
/r/RedPillWomen31/07/17 04:20 AM
3

The Red Pill is about telling unpleasant truths. The Blue Pill is about wishing them away. The degree to which photos are misleading is not similar between the genders. It is not close. Yes, men do lie about their height a lot. They have incentive to do this, as women have been shown to attach extraordinary significance to a man's height. You may counter that in a world where every other woman's photos lie significantly, a given woman must do likewise to date "within her league". But the fact re…
/r/RedPillWomen31/07/17 04:19 AM
2

If you understand that, then you have an advantage over the millions of women who want a man who is accomplished in every area of life and yet still somehow has nothing but free time all day.
/r/RedPillWomen31/07/17 04:16 AM
3

Answer: You don't make the judgment yourself. The entire reason the Red Pill exists is that women are terrible at making rational relationship decisions, instead being driven entirely by emotion. That's what all Red Pill advice to men is: Stop trying to be the pragmatic choice, the "good on paper", and start learning to manipulate women's emotions, because that's the only thing that matters. Improving physical appearance is the most obvious form of emotional manipulation, "game" is another. Ever…
/r/RedPillWomen30/07/17 09:55 PM
1

You didn't ask if experience makes men "better at" relationships. You asked if it makes them more committed. The RedPill answer is no. A number of schools of thought, not just RedPill, agree that more experience with women makes men more misogynist. Simply put, the world puts women on a pedestal that they can't possibly live up to, so every experience is disappointing. More experiences = more disillusionment. The "experience" that is relevant here becomes "experience being cheated on, betrayed, …
/r/RedPillWomen30/07/17 09:46 PM
1

It should be your job to actually make that an unwise decision. The reason many men make it is that it is WISER than the alternative.
/r/RedPillWomen30/07/17 09:43 PM
1

Well, let's see. If he's attractive, he can sleep with many different women in exchange for nothing, OR he can give you everything he has and make himself slave to your whims, knowing that you'll likely tire of him eventually and take your kids and all his money, leaving him emotionally devastated and ruin his reputation by telling horrible stories about being married to him because you want the world to see you as the victim. Pretty easy choice. If he's not attractive and no woman wants him, th…
/r/RedPillWomen30/07/17 09:41 PM
1

They ARE feminists. Feminism is the enemy of femininity.
/r/RedPillWomen30/07/17 09:35 PM
2

Women will tell literally everyone that they're beautiful.
/r/RedPillWomen30/07/17 09:33 PM
2

There are no women with accurate pictures in online dating. None. Every man figures this out quite quickly.
/r/RedPillWomen30/07/17 09:32 PM
2

If you have a solid job, have sound theology, and Christian women aren't chasing you, you must have the body of a stick figure and/or the game of a wet towel. Solid attractive christian men (who are single) are in such short supply in the church that women will throw themselves at them when one appears. Become attractive. You would be shocked at how the single women at church begin hunting you down. This is most definitely not true, for the same reason that the feminist "there are no good men" n…
/r/RPChristians30/07/17 12:00 AM
15

Women have no agency. Feminism says so. Our experiences say so. Egalitarianism is an ideal, not a science. We are not the same.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/17 06:20 PM
1

And this is the problem. The moment someone says "genetics are significant", some idiot says "nuh uh, genetics aren't EVERYTHING!" and thinks he's making a counter-argument. If you had the same behavior and great genetics, you'd be having a threesome with two hotter 20-year-olds.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 03:58 PM
2

This post calls attention to one of the most controversial RP truths: The significance of genetics. This guy is no alpha, but he has sterling genetics, so he gets success that he doesn't earn. Too many people here say "Lift moar, brah!" as if "you can do anything you put your mind to." That is not Red Pill. That is Disney. Life is not fair. Get used to it. And then go lift, because even if you can't become Chris Hemsworth, or perhaps even as attractive as the guy in your story, you still have to…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 02:47 AM
2

Basic Economics is the best book you'll ever read.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/17 05:06 PM
5

I want to rec this, because I can't stand people who blindly associate government "education" with status, but there's a problem. The problem is the notion that her excuse for not dating you is her real reason. It never is. If she's saying no "because you don't have a degree" she's hamstering. Does Chris Hemsworth have a degree? Would she care if you were him?
/r/TheRedPill26/06/17 02:06 PM
4

That is an easily recognized list of partisan cherry-picked half-truths. It comes from a very self-defeating ideology.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/17 10:00 PM
2

Hypergamy is only as "good" as perception.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/17 01:09 AM
3

This is a subreddit about sexual strategy. Why is everyone on ESPN so obsessed with sports?
/r/TheRedPill09/05/17 02:25 PM
1

Women are like toddlers. A toddler is so solipsistic that he's incapable of caring about you. He literally lacks the capacity. You could have just chopped off your thumb and be screaming in agony and he'd be like "I spilled my cup. Refill it. Now!" He'll ignore you, his attention changes with the wind, and generally be extremely difficult to keep happy for more than 30 seconds. And yet, when we see a toddler, all we want to do is be his friend. Introduce a toddler to a group of six adults and th…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/17 02:24 PM
1

The problem with this conversation is that it's hard to tell, externally, where women actually are. They lie a lot. It's like trying to compute statistics around "dating" with the assumption that if a couple gets married, then the woman must be attracted to the man. Often times, it's more of a post-wall beta bucks situation. Were you ever in the friendzone, or was the woman just hamstering her own flakiness at a given time? Did you escape it, or is she just feeling lonely for a moment? BPD cloud…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/17 02:18 PM
1

That's a hell of an "if". The whole point is that a lot of people here believe that that's not possible.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/17 02:11 PM
1

"Management" can be a career killer. You don't learn anything that's not specific to your employer and your transferable skills languish. Go for compensation and personal development, not the ladder at one specific company, especially a small one.
/r/askTRP20/04/17 04:52 AM
11

If we're talking LTRs, it's because women's sexual history has a proven negative correlation with LTR-suitability.
/r/askTRP17/04/17 03:32 AM
1

People you've known all along will not take note of it. They're more likely to act resentful. I go to a house party with old friends and get asked "what's new with you" and there are no right answers. Anything true is treated as bragging. I answer the same question in the same way with newer acquaintances and they're just impressed.
/r/askTRP13/04/17 04:17 AM
1

Guaranteed she's telling her friends that you were boring, as if it's your fault that you didn't talk at all.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/17 09:02 PM
2

Women flake all the time. Some TRP types will insist that you've failed to game her well enough if she flakes, but that's toxic thinking. You'll tie yourself in knots trying to figure out why you failed, but it was HER. She's a woman, ergo she's crazy, and being flaky is just part of that.
/r/askTRP31/03/17 05:28 AM
1

Men are led to believe that screwing up with one woman ruins their chances with everyone else around her. That's not true. In fact, having ANY drama-laden association with one of them will probably improve your chances with the others. Women are a hive mind when it comes to their sexual strategy, but they are rivals when it comes to specific men. Don't assume that they like and agree with each other about you. If one hates you, it likely HELPS you with the others! The worst case is being ignored…
/r/askTRP30/03/17 05:09 PM
5

I work in software and invest in real estate. Both arenas are male-dominated. I wish I could meet more women while pursuing my passions but they simply don't exist in my domains. The other night I was at a real-estate investor meetup. It was at a bar, discount drinks, just a meet-and-greet. There were like 50 men there, and a number of them were young guys with crap jobs who knew virtually nothing about investing and have no money but wanted to rub elbows with people who do. They were inquisitiv…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 02:17 PM
5

Poor woman doesn't like that we're on to her. Probably hates when her boyfriend goes off to hang with his girlfriends, too.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/17 03:28 AM
1

That's from the same dictionary that says that feminism is about equality.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/17 03:52 AM
8

"Creepy" is anything she's not attracted to.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/17 03:35 AM
9

Can we agree to stop using asinine terms like "men of color"?
/r/askTRP11/03/17 07:24 PM
6

You can't fix other people. You can demonstrate the right way, but don't frame it as advice. Just let it be you talking, making seemingly-random observations about the world. But it probably won't work, and you need to accept that.
/r/askTRP11/03/17 07:22 PM
1

99 times out of 100 a M/F friendship is at least one of these: He wants to have sex with her. She gets him to do things for her without reciprocating, because she can. Neither makes for a healthy "friendship". In the rare case where neither of these factors is in play, there could still be trouble if outsiders assume that they are. In short, tread carefully.
/r/askTRP10/03/17 09:58 PM
1

You do not "lock down" a woman. She is always hypergamous, so if you fade, she'll leave. A great body likely gets you a night with her, though.
/r/askTRP10/03/17 09:52 PM
1

WOMEN glorify alpha, by preferring him to beta. They have no voluntary control over this. Red Pill doesn't glorify; it simply acknowledges reality.
/r/askTRP10/03/17 09:51 PM
6

If they deserve all of that just for existing, what do we deserve for all of our efforts?
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 05:41 AM
8

You terribly misunderstand what capitalism is, and I don't think you want to get it right.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/17 05:33 AM
1

Sigh... if I had a nickel for every man who succeeds in spite of himself and thinks he's got a good technique...
/r/TheRedPill04/03/17 08:25 PM
2

You just betrayed your argument. People who say looks don't matter (for either gender, in any context) are ALWAYS good-looking themselves. They don't understand their own privilege. Where is your evidence that the "ugly guy with status and social proof" is anything other than King Beta Bucks, with everyone around him taking a handout? And how does your own failure to be alpha in any way other than looks invalidate the fact that your looks gave you the CHANCE to fail, where others never even got …
/r/TheRedPill04/03/17 08:22 PM
0

You first. You're jumping from one left-wing propaganda point to another too quickly to allow any rebuttals, but all of what you've posted has been debunked. Your kind simply don't listen to anything that's not bubble-approved. You demonstrated this quite well with your post: "That is irrelevant. We are not talking about black men here we are talking about spousal abuse." You dismissed the allegory that debunked your point, not because it was irrelevant, but because you lacked an answer.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/17 12:31 AM
1

33 and never kissed a girl. But the pain made me a great athlete and a self-made millionaire. Yeah, I'm ugly, and despite all the contrary BS out their women are the more superficial (read: emotion-ruled) gender. They want me to buy them stuff and take them on experiences, and I can either oblige and get nothing or refuse and get nothing. That is life.
/r/seduction28/02/17 07:58 PM
6

The only way a man gets anywhere online is if he has a top 20% face. Period. It's genetic, so if you don't have it, plastic surgery or GTFO. There are tons of blogs where really attractive men demonstrate that saying "hey" gets a high response rate because they are attractive. Similarly, every messaging strategy ever conceived has been shown to be worthless for average-looking men. Women have tons of perceived options online, and they base their decisions on looks. Period. Online dating doesn't …
/r/seduction28/02/17 07:56 PM
1

Got ya beat at 33.
/r/seduction22/02/17 08:58 PM
2

Giving up at 21? Wow. I'm 33 and still haven't gotten a single date. On the plus side, I'm in incredible shape and a self-made millionaire now. Not that anyone here will believe me, but that's the point: You only survive this long by not needing anyone else. I know I don't look attractive, but I also know I'm doing way better at LIFE than almost everyone around me. Women or no women, you have to have something in YOURSELF to be proud of or you won't survive.
/r/seduction22/02/17 08:55 PM
3

You will win an argument and nothing else. The next guy to sleep with a girl due to his intellectual acumen will be the first.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/17 03:02 AM
4

TRP is supposed to be about acknowledging the cold, hard, unvarnished truth, regardless of its implications. That means yes, we should acknowledge that a man's looks, particularly facial aesthetics, are far more important than the blue-pill world says they are. And yes, there are other factors that we can control.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/17 04:34 PM
2

In left-wing land, emotion is currency. She had emotion, ergo she had reason for action.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/17 04:29 AM
2

You need to have a very shallow understanding of Leftism to believe that it's compatible with TRP.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/17 05:54 PM
1

The free market puts the means of production in the hands of the workers. You own your own life and labor! Marxism puts control in the hands of authoritarian elites.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/17 05:53 PM
3

You're straw manning. Almost nobody anywhere denies that humans influence the climate in some way. We just disagree on the extent and, more significantly, whether certain proposed remedies are good ideas. The Left tends to use climate change alarmism as an excuse to impose socialism, which is what the Right actually opposes. It's much like how feminism says that we NEED their divorce laws, and if you disagree, you want women to be treated like property.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/17 05:50 PM
0

You are not actually left-wing. You're just misinformed as to the real left/right split.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/17 05:48 PM
1

The Right and Conservatism are not synonyms. It's like saying that the Left and Liberalism are synonyms, even though the true liberalism has always been right-wing. The conversation is just really messed up. Conservatism is the belief that the sum of all wisdom derived throughout human history should not be discarded in favor of something you thought up in five minutes while sitting on the toilet. There is value in conservatism, but what is conserved can also be wrong (earth is flat, right?). Li…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/17 05:45 PM
1

Because I want to, which is why I said not to bother with responses that simply judge and don't offer advice.
/r/askTRP12/02/17 06:33 AM
1

32-year-old virgin is not impressed with your sob story.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/17 06:49 PM
6

Feminists misdefine strong as "agreeing with them."
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 04:01 PM
3

Men face tremendous social penalties for being fat. Women also face some penalty. Only one side gets defended. Life's not fair. Get used to it.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 03:26 AM
1

I've run five Mudders, and I actually RUN them. My picks tend to get < 5 likes. I am in great shape, but still not attractive.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/17 03:36 AM
1

I posted a headline that contained a question mark but was not even remotely a question (it was a rhetorical reference to the article I was sharing) and got a 30 day ban. Not appropriate.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/17 04:19 AM
2

Here's a good start: http://freenortherner.com/2013/06/21/sexonomics-odds-of-divorce/
/r/askTRP16/01/17 10:34 PM
1

Not at all true. Lots of men get none at all.
/r/askTRP16/01/17 10:27 PM
1

They don't always do that, and when they do, they have other options.
/r/askTRP15/01/17 05:20 AM
1

As others have implied, you can't use formal "relationship status" as an indicator of success. Many marriages are dead bedrooms.
/r/askTRP15/01/17 05:19 AM
1

The Red Pill is not about trying to be morally superior to women. It's about not getting taken advantage of by women. It's not a contradiction to respond to hypergamy with dread game; it's leveling the playing field.
/r/askTRP15/01/17 05:16 AM
1

Speaking of different expectations for different genders, how suspicious would feminists consider this post if it appeared on jezebel.com?
/r/askTRP15/01/17 05:10 AM
1

So you're actually getting dates? Welcome to the top 20%.
/r/askTRP15/01/17 05:08 AM
2

Having past partners changes women in ways that it does not change men. The instinct to detest them is rooted in real degradation of their relationship value. Even if you're not looking for a relationship, the instinct is part of you.
/r/askTRP15/01/17 05:06 AM
1

Getting fulfillment via women will end in disappointment.
/r/askTRP15/01/17 05:03 AM
1

The Red Pill is about seeing reality. Cold, hard, reality. No Disney fantasies, no delusions. Just truth. What people do with this knowledge is not part of the Red Pill. There are a bunch of different groups and directions, and some will claim to be "True Red Pill", but by definition, advice is not part of the Red Pill. Red Pill is information. Red Pill was founded as a male sexual strategy community, so the focus is on the truth about women, with a lot of it boiling down to the fact that they a…
/r/askTRP15/01/17 05:02 AM
0

The word you're looking for is "delusional." You can theoretically end up married for 60 years, but it won't be as wonderful as you imagine. Women are people, not angels. People who are smaller, weaker, and more emotion-ruled than men.
/r/askTRP15/01/17 04:55 AM
2

Indeed hard work BS is BS. How hard you work does not matter. What you produce does. That is why some people achieve big gains in the gym while others toil endlessly and go nowhere. They know what they are doing and they make their time count, while the losers think that the more time they spend and the more it hurts, the better it must be. Work smarter, not harder.
/r/askTRP15/01/17 04:53 AM
1

She was looking for validation. When she got it, she didn't need anything else from you. Quit thinking it's all about you. In her mind, it's all about her.
/r/seduction05/01/17 01:34 AM
11

This is where I hate this reddit. The red pill is about acknowledging cold, hard reality, not deluding ourselves with "you can do anything you put your mind to."
/r/TheRedPill20/12/16 05:37 AM
4

Feminists employ the motte and bailey technique: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Motte_and_bailey. The motte is that they believe in equal rights. The bailey is that they are to men what the KKK is to blacks.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/16 04:34 AM
87

Is that actually his height and weight or is that her sales pitch for her self-pity party? Do you think she's actually only 50 pounds overweight?
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 01:38 AM
2

If women can shame us for positive characteristics, we can shame them for negative ones.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/16 06:49 PM
1

Creating the impression that she can benefit from your money increases your SMV. Simply having it does not.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/16 06:45 PM
3

Waiter probably thinks you chose not to tip because you were personally insulted by his behavior. He's probably proud of himself for taking one for those poor girls! One question though: you paid the entire tab for them?
/r/TheRedPill23/11/16 06:44 PM
1

A woman who uses sexuality as a tool is... a woman. If we want a term to distinguish those who are worse from those who are better (at risk of contradicting AWALT), we can make one, but the word "slut" is already taken and has another meaning. As others have said, it means "a person with no self-control."
/r/TheRedPill22/11/16 03:28 AM
0

I don't look good in pictures. Just not horrible. Well below the top 20% needed to get responses online. My build is very unlike most men's and would never have you guessing how strong I am, and my face is definitely not attractive. The frozen side that makes all my expressions look weird is what keeps me from winning with behavior.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/16 02:08 AM
7

I look good enough in a still photo, but my eyebrows don't move normally and my facial expressions in general are strange. Upshot: bad body language. At a subconscious level, this is incredibly powerful. Far more than you'd imagine. There's nothing that can be done to fix it. Women just infer "run away", as all my behaviors read "creepy." The rest of me does not matter.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 04:15 AM
13

Sorry, but all the work in the world won't stop me from violating the rules: 1. Be Attractive. 2. Don't be Unattractive. Mainly #2. I've already got a double bodyweight bench, triple bodyweight squat, a $150k job, and no approach anxiety. But I'm either an LJBF or a "jerk" of the sort that makes them walk away angry. There is no other outcome, and I've run out of ways to improve. Here's your ultimate Red Pill truth: You CAN'T do anything you put your mind to.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 03:59 AM
80

32 years old and I honestly can't think of a single nice thing a woman has ever done for me. Yup, blue pill as hell!
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 03:25 AM
-7

If you're a good blue pill career man, you can make it at least 10 more years. Trust me.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 02:56 AM
4

Proudly declaring that the candidate's gender is a big factor in your vote makes you sexist. Period.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/16 04:42 AM
1

You can't separate the system from its consequences.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/16 01:25 PM
3

Physical attractiveness is by far the greatest "privilege" in the world.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/16 01:24 PM
1

Two questions about what I perceive to be contradictions in common Red Pill conversation: First, how do we balance outcome independence with having goals and purpose? I'm supposed to persevere towards my goal, but not care if I lose it? Second, how do we balance social proof and preselection with the idea that we don't want women to use us as girlfriends/orbiters?
/r/TheRedPill27/10/16 09:12 PM
3

A 50th percentile woman gets positive attention for her looks. A 50th percentile man does not.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/16 02:10 AM
3

What's important is to be PERCEIVED as having these. Having them is meaningless if a woman doesn't know you have them. Looks are obvious, but money and status are not.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/16 01:56 AM
2

She needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle, right?
/r/TheRedPill27/10/16 01:53 AM
4

Manipulation works. Personality does not. They seem like the same thing to the uneducated.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/16 03:44 AM
0

Great, now my house is working against me too :(
/r/TheRedPill26/10/16 03:42 AM
8

You're thinking rationally. Women do not.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/16 03:40 AM
3

Don't confuse being called a narcissist with being a narcissist. Especially if it's said by a woman.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/16 05:03 AM
5

You are better off without them, and they are worse off without you.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/16 01:25 AM
2

Women are incredibly self-deluded.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/16 06:48 PM
30

"Wit, humour, intelligence, and other positive traits women claim to want only matter after attraction has been established." Gold.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/16 05:36 PM
1

If he tries to make contact daily, that's needy. How do we balance?
/r/TheRedPill22/10/16 04:00 AM
6

Thank you for sharing this. There are always more people who need it.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/16 03:56 AM
4

Sorry man. You did well, but you can only control you.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/16 03:53 AM
4

And if you're 5'11, 185 after years of lifting, with an income over $130k, and still getting nowhere with women, then you know that apparently top 20% isn't good enough.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/16 03:48 AM
5

Tests are constant. IOIs reveal whether you're passing.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/16 05:12 AM
1

The 77% stat (more recently 78%... 79%... ok it's most recently 80%) comes from comparing the annual earnings of the average woman who works enough hours per YEAR to qualify as "full-time" by the US government's definition to the annual earnings of the average "full-time" man. There is no accounting for education, years of experience, or type of work. Most importantly, there is no accounting for HOURS of work. Some people barely cross the "full-time" threshold, while others are WAY over it. If a…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/16 04:26 AM
1

Poor guy. He has no idea why "respecting her" isn't working.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/16 04:22 AM
1

If every member of one gender really was way better than the other, the Red Pill community would never have formed. You sound like you're trying to make red pill men out of losers by being a "good woman." This is as foolish as many men's effort to make bad women into good women by being great themselves. Granted, AWALT is a big part of Red Pill conversation, but among the many men in the community who are open to LTRs, I've never seen a one who doesn't claim that only some women are LTR material…
/r/RedPillWomen20/10/16 04:02 AM
7

Saying it's harder in your 30s is an understatement.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/16 03:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter