"N count shouldn't matter!" Gems from r/redpillwomen

Soup_or_Die · 2017-09-08T00:39:55+00:00

Once a thot, always a thot

dfhgdgfsdsdffhdgfh · 2017-09-08T01:11:17+00:00

redpillwomen with a high n count

No such thing, only born again sluts

Zombocom1911 · 2017-09-08T02:25:50+00:00

it doesn't matter to me, because i'm not looking to wife these sluts up or have children with them, at all

BewareTheOldMan · 2017-09-08T05:38:00+00:00

I read the comments/questions and responded. Some "gems" include...

“What's considered a high/ low n count these days? Serious question.”

My response - Serious answer: Consider a woman who has been sexually active since age 14/15. Lowballing at 2 x men per year through age 25, that's about 20-22 sexual partners....just to age 25.

I personally know of a young woman with 1 x sexual partner who is age 23 with the same young man since college. They marry next year (early 2018). His number is unknown, but his behavior indicates low experience in relationships and Blue Pill conditioning. That won't matter, however, assuming his fiancée faithfully fulfills her wifely duties as well as he performs his manly/husband duties in a positive manner. This couple has a great chance of going the distance into old age better than most. It's possible.

Better answer for NON-VIRGINS - one to three partners in a long-term EXCLUSIVE relationship WITHOUT all the random sexual encounters/hookups that "don't count." These women are "salvageable" and have a better chance of being good long-term mates.

Another commenter: "depends on the guy. Honestly most don't care after they are in their upper 20s to 30s. If they are younger then the reality is they just want you to have a lower n-count then them. The more insecure the guy the more it matters"

My response: Of note (in your comment) is the classic male-shaming tactic of referencing a man's insecurities to deflect responsibility for past/current promiscuity.

Here's some Red Pill: Many men don't mind promiscuous women. They are wonderful people and in fact sometimes necessary and fortuitous for some men. However, a smart man will AVOID a highly promiscuous woman due to the fact that many of these "reformed women" (assuming they are indeed reformed) make TERRIBLE wives. There is now research, empirical data, and anecdotal evidence to support this statement. No...I will NOT cite references, but CHALLLENGE anyone to do the work to prove otherwise and deduce your own conclusions.

High N-Count women have high divorce rates due to "dissatisfaction" (at a nationwide rate of 70+percent with it higher in some states). Researchers, psychologists, and behavioral specialists generally agree highly promiscuous women do much worse in long-term relationships - assuming they can even maintain a relationship. In summary, it goes to comparing the now-boyfriend/new husband to numerous past lovers. Very few men measure up to past lovers who may/may not include athletes, pretty-boys, Bad Boys, celebrities, wealthy/rich men, the guys with the 10-12 inch genitalia, random wild sex that include threesomes, foursomes, orgies, etc. For some anecdotal information, see the subreddit: Dead Bedroom

Of course exceptions exist, but these women are statistical outliers and are NOT the norm. To keep a "changed woman" honest, faithful, and hesitant to divorce...the man would have to be an EXCEPTIONAL, TOP TIER, HIGH VALUE male. The woman in this case would have MUCH to lose via infidelity or divorce. The irony is that THESE type of men generally avoid high N-Count women.

No man is "insecure" for avoiding that baggage. He's smart and looking out for himself, health, future, future wealth, and his future children (should this person have the PRIVILEGE of being the mother of his kids).

I truly applaud ANY formerly promiscuous woman who can commit to fidelity, moral righteousness, high character and integrity in a LTR and wish nothing but Good Luck. Again – she would be the exception.

Another Red Pill Commenter hit them with this response: She has to tell herself this because most of these 'redpill' women don't want to hear that they fucked up for good. They have essentially ruined their ability to pair bond and will never really be able to commit to an LTR.

A few people told the hard truth, but it was mostly "rationalizing" their promiscuity or being clueless that "reformed sluts" are some of the WORST type of women and are NOT suitable as wives or LTRs.

These women don't get it. Being TRULY Red Pill means telling the ugly truth, NOT trying to explain your negative/promiscuous behavior. Just own it already and accept "damaged goods" status.

2QuietDude · 2017-09-08T01:30:37+00:00

It doesn't matter what the count is if you pump and dump

Teflon0819 · 2017-09-08T02:53:55+00:00

It doesn't matter.

So a lot then?

ClickUsername4MGTOW · 2017-09-08T04:20:33+00:00

Red pill women? WTF? Do women have to always take philosophies we create? Even when they create their own philosophies like feminism, they end up failing, what makes them think we want them around still?

AsianJewLawyer · 2017-09-08T02:51:47+00:00

That thread really says it all lol

huckleberryferry · 2017-09-08T07:34:24+00:00

Girls in their early stages: teenagehood and early 20s to mid 20s are purely interested in looks and would move out with, date or sleep with ANY guy they feel purely physically attracted to, even if the guy has nothing (money, status, properties) or a monstrous personality. However, when they start to age (at least from their late 20s or from their 30s) and get wiser, they DEVELOP interest in other aspects of a man and not wholly looks, such as the status, monetary power, masculinity, personality, and so forth; because by then, they've have come to know with their "feminine wisdom" that they cannot wholly survive on or depend on a man's looks—reason of which women in their latter stages of life would settle with a short but rich guy, ugly but well-built guy, fat but with a "nice guy" character guy, etc. Believe me, a college girl will sleep with an 8 with an ultra "nice guy" syndrome but not a 6 with same.

One thing to note is that "they aren't NECESSARILY in love with those guys they SETTLE with" (which is a delusion a lot of guys with "undesirable" traits but married suffer) but just that those guys could protect and defend, provide, cater for, give them a social prestige or validation, etc. during the rest of their living on earth; or those guys COMPLEMENT them, just that. The only way (or at least one way) to ascertain that she isn't really in love with you but "just settling with you" is to lose that which you suspect got her attracted to you in the first place (money, status, personality, respectfulness, charisma, sense of humour, etc.), you would then see how she will immediately get "bored" or uninterested in you and begin to feign or create all sorts of excuses and reasons (frigidness, cheating, nagging, excessive complaints, etc.) to get you also uninterested or mad at her or wanting out of the relationship/ marriage—and this, of course is when you absolutely lack looks (8—10, and bonus traits like height, mascularness, alpha/ intolerant traits, etc.) but were compensating with something else; it'd be rare for a woman to "give up" on a man of high quality in marriage/ relationship: a man with good looks, money, status and personality.

Just MY humble observation.

Edit: This post seems quite irrelevant to this thread but I'd add that the MAIN point I want to drive here is that those "redpill women" are those I referred to as "aged up/ wiser" women who have "reformed," and reconsider other things to be interested in in a man other than pure looks as they were in their youth.

aanarchist · 2017-09-08T04:47:20+00:00

You should see the other fucked up shit rpws say. One was considering aborting her child because her husband died, keep her smv up. Some comments are actually red pill but theres a lot of blue pills there. Trp has been getting more blue pill every month tbh.

Actanonverba11 · 2017-09-08T15:01:39+00:00

Women with high N-counts to men is like men who make low-income to women: you may screw them and have a good time, but they are not marriage material. They lose their ability to pair bond, which leaves you vulnerable to infidelity, divorce, etc. Science backs this up.

An LTR, especially a Marriage, has to be built on trust. If she's willing to lie or deflect about something as supposedly "trivial" like her N-count, she's willing to lie about anything.

EconomistMagazine · 2017-09-08T17:50:25+00:00

From one of the commenters...

Your actions have consequences, even if those actions were in the past. You have to be a woman about it and not think you can lie your way out of anything uncomfortable.

Straight truth right there. More people need this advice.

SnapshillBot · 2017-09-07T23:53:53+00:00

Archived for your convenience

Snapshots:

This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is
https://np.reddit.com/r/RedPillWome... - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

^{I am a bot.} ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)

andreas-mgtow · 2017-09-08T05:46:55+00:00

Next time a woman tells you she's "grown" so much since, it's code for "I'm a used up ~~to be a~~ whore".

FTFY

2017-09-08T07:05:11+00:00

Funny how they accept redpill truths which complement their trad con lifestyles but anything they don't agree they dismiss as pseudoscience

I-am-the-lul · 2017-09-08T07:12:21+00:00

"BEGONE THOT!" is the proper MGTOW response to these women.

Malefics · 2017-09-08T04:08:08+00:00

What a disgusting sub.

plutosheen · 2017-09-08T04:57:36+00:00

[deleted]

robowriter · 2017-09-08T06:33:39+00:00

A LTR called it "slut in the blood." Once you start that fire you can't put it out so you need to exhibit some type of self-control or things get fucked.

She was right and that was a good relationship but she still had all the behavioral aspects -- no money no honey. AWALT but some smarter than others, their character depends on how many dicks have spewed up the love canal.

PinHunter65 · 2017-09-08T15:51:45+00:00

At this point in time. Its not even about her having a high "N" number. Its really about the fact that all they do is talk about if they should lie about it or not. Thats what they do now, they just talk about what things they should and should not lie about. Its not even the number anymore, its the constant over-the-top lying with a complete lack of disregard for other people.

2017-09-08T21:12:39+00:00

[deleted]

2017-09-08T06:36:03+00:00

Dirty mingers.

2017-09-08T17:32:12+00:00

That's right little princess snowflake...it shouldn't matter. But in the real world...where everyone lives...it fucking does matter. So...deal with it.

2017-09-08T18:19:39+00:00

I've done a lot of work on myself and I am nothing like the person that I used to be when I was sleeping around. I'm afraid that who I was in the past will change his opinion of who I am now.

this is what whores and sluts actually believe

ManIsWalking · 2017-09-08T21:02:55+00:00

Women seem confused about how sexual differences between the genders really matter.

A man can have a high N count because his promiscuity isn't ranked high in his smv, it's his status and resources women want most.

A woman can't have a high N count because it's their physical attractiveness and chastity that men look for most when looking for a life partner.

They may not think that's fair, but that's just how it works. If women wanted to change that stigma, they will need to learn to bring more than sex to the table.

TheOldEskimo · 2017-09-09T22:32:25+00:00

I'm honestly (pleasantly) shocked some of them are giving advice to be honest.

That said, I think asking about N count is pointless because they'll just lie.

inspiron3000 · 2017-09-11T13:54:05+00:00

I have a reasonably high number count from my past...

Reasonably?!

Says who?

imdar3ald3al · 2017-12-17T13:21:15+00:00

I scanned the comments. She had between 40 to 60 dicks and is wondering if she should disclose. Haha

Title	"N count shouldn't matter!" Gems from r/redpillwomen
Author	plutosheen
Upvotes	99
Comments	68
Date	September 7, 2017 11:53 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/6yr4sg/n_count_shouldnt_matter_gems_from_rredpillwomen/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/n-count-shouldnt-matter-gems-from-rredpillwomen.558101 https://theredarchive.com/post/558101

Comments