Here’s the article that fueled this post: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/26/opinion/when-misogynists-become-terrorists.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-right-region&region=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-right-region

This is my first time posting – constructive criticism is encouraged.

Earlier this week in Toronto a young man went on a killing spree in a van, driving on a sidewalk and mowing down dozens of people, killing 10. Further investigation reveals the killer was sexually-frustrated and active on incel sites on 4chan and elsewhere, lamenting women for never sucking his beta dick. Thus, the “manosphere” has been thrusted into the mainstream once again. “Manosphere,” as described by the outside, encompasses a wide range of online groups, spanning men’s rights groups to TRP to incels, and they all are fueled by hatred against women and should be rejected outright by anyone who cares about women. My mentioning of this lumping together of all these groups will be relevant later. The conversations being had are the same ones had in the wake of the deranged killer who, in 2014, citing sexual frustration, murdered 6 people and injured many more in a stabbing spree. (I’m leaving the names out because these people are the scum of the Earth and deserve no further attention beyond their heinous actions.)

The general mainstream consensus is that misogyny is what fueled these killers. While I don’t believe that claim to be entirely false, I do believe citing hatred as a motivator for any behavior stops the entire discussion about what can actually be done to prevent further incidents like this from happening, with solutions usually being some form of teaching young boys to respekt wamen. When you dive deeper you can see the underlying flaws in thinking that all of these killers share: (1) they’re usually losers to begin with, pursuing nothing of meaning in their lives, (2) they equate self-worth with their n-count, (3) they feel entitled to women’s attention, simply for existing and having a dick, and (4) they put one girl on a pedestal, who rejects them when they proclaim their love for them. Number 4 is usually the spark that ignites the kindling that is (1), (2), and (3). Then they lash out.

These men are betas. They have little career prospects and have nothing going for them. They live for affirmation from women. They don’t lift. They have a scarcity mentality. When was the last news story you’ve seen of stoic, alpha Chad Thundercock killing women because he can’t get laid. I’ll wait.

Comments online offering alternative solutions to the mainstream usually state, someone in jest, something like: “if one woman would have taken the bullet and slept with this guy all of this could have been avoided.” My problem with this is what happens a week after this beta’s balls are full again and he has the same toxic mindset? Are we just going to supply these losers with a weekly stream of whores to ride him for 40 seconds in order to keep society stable? Obviously no.

TRP offers a different solution. Instead of teaching boys to act more like women, teach them to embrace the positive aspects of masculinity: independence, not giving a fuck, abundance mentality, pursuing a purpose. Instead of teaching boys to not hate women, teach them not to get hung up on women. Teach them to build a life for themselves, regardless of women’s attention. Teach them that a girl’s attention, and getting laid in general, should be 100th on their list of priorities instead of #1, #2, and #3.

And for the love of God, TRP shouldn’t be lumped in with incels. The only thing in common between incels and TRP is the acknowledgement of women’s nature. From there, the incel crowd goes down the rabbit hole stuck in the anger phase. A Red Pill man moves on from the anger phase and begins reconstructing his frame of mind and his life with this newfound perspectives, putting himself first while pursuing life’s purpose. A simple scan of the sidebar will make this distinction obvious.