~ archived since 2018 ~

Sources that discuss issues with pair bonding/high sex partner count?

BeavisVonDingus · 2015-05-06T16:08:55+00:00

It's often said (in red pill/mgtow type posts) that a woman with a high number of sex partners doesn't make for a good long term mate as she...

BeavisVonDingus

May 6, 2015

5 upvotes

/r/askTRP

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Sources that discuss issues with pair bonding/high sex partner count?
Author	BeavisVonDingus
Upvotes	5
Comments	4
Date	May 6, 2015 4:08 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/askTRP
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/352lr9/sources_that_discuss_issues_with_pair_bondinghigh/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/askTRP/sources-that-discuss-issues-with-pair-bondinghigh.148683 https://theredarchive.com/post/148683

Comments

[–]Endorsed ContributorAFPJ4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Quick source and full source and the data behind it - upgrade your investigative skills, there's a ton of valid data and citations on the subject: they're just not on page one of your search results because they're not politically correct.

To your defense, most of the web is moving to a Truth by Consensus representation, with Google spearheading the efforts via their knowledge-based ranking. As the internet technology matures it will be subdued into the MSM agenda, much like there were pirate / very controversial radio stations everywhere during the first years of AM/FM technology.

...Now you get fined for cursing on the air, lol. The internet is headed in the same direction, much quicker - alternative search channels & dark-net are an option, unlike radio: I suggest everyone reading becomes proficient in those: you'd be surprised how much useful and massively beneficial in the real world information can be found there. Rant complete

[–]rokr12920 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]BeavisVonDingus[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]BannedAlpha0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here are some other parts of the study which are generally ignored - 'In addition, women who marry men with less education, men who were married before, men of a different race or religion, men who are at least 2 years younger, or men who believe that religion is important to very important are at a higher risk of marital disruption.' source based off this study

With a study like this we are only getting correlation, not isolating for causation. Like with this religion thing stated above, we can't determine if it is the view of the husband or a problem innate in the woman that accounts for each divorce.

And on a fun side note - here are some good correlations backed by data and graphs -

1-Number people who drowned by falling into a swimming-pool correlates with Number of films Nicolas Cage appeared in - Imgur

2- Per capita consumption of cheese (US) correlates with Number of people who died by becoming tangled in their bedsheets - Imgur

3- Divorce rate in Maine correlates with Per capita consumption of margarine (US) - Imgur

source

I am not saying to ignore this entirely, but if you don't know how to read data or think critically you are just looking for things to hold up beliefs you pulled out of thin air.