TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AceyJuan Archive

View 28 posts and 463 comments by AceyJuan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1815

AceyJuan/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:27 AM
568

Social IssuesAceyJuan/r/MensRights19/09/15 04:15 AM
373

AceyJuan/r/MensRights06/01/14 08:15 AM
189

AceyJuan/r/MensRights30/06/13 06:44 AM
171

False AccusationAceyJuan/r/MensRights23/12/15 03:31 AM
124

AceyJuan/r/MensRights29/06/13 08:45 AM
105

AceyJuan/r/MensRights16/06/13 12:32 AM
81

AceyJuan/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:54 PM
44

AceyJuan/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:33 AM
37

AceyJuan/r/MensRights25/07/13 06:30 PM
35

AceyJuan/r/MensRights16/09/13 10:13 AM
34

AceyJuan/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:23 AM
31

AceyJuan/r/MensRights20/07/13 07:39 PM
29

False AccusationAceyJuan/r/MensRights18/12/15 06:54 AM
21

AceyJuan/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:28 AM
21

FeminismAceyJuan/r/MensRights12/08/15 12:18 AM
19

DiscriminationAceyJuan/r/MensRights23/07/15 07:55 AM
7

DiscussionAceyJuan/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:01 PM
4

AceyJuan/r/MensRights28/06/13 06:23 AM
4

AceyJuan/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:39 AM
4

AceyJuan/r/MensRights21/06/13 01:14 AM
4

AceyJuan/r/MensRights23/06/13 07:48 AM
3

FeminismAceyJuan/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:09 AM
2

AceyJuan/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:50 AM
1

AceyJuan/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:29 AM
1

AceyJuan/r/MensRights21/06/13 11:41 PM
0

AceyJuan/r/MensRights28/06/13 07:55 AM
0

AceyJuan/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:19 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I couldn't agree more.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 09:08 PM
1

Yeah, the "I dreamed his face" bit is bullshit but would you put the blame on a distraught women who was raped or on the police following that stupid lead instead of more solid leads she gave? This one's on the justice system including police, the prosecutor, labs, and the courts.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 07:16 AM
2

There must have been something, but since the guy didn't do it you should realize that the police can always come up with something that looks bad. For example, "I can put you in Queens on the night of the hijacking."
/r/MensRights23/12/15 07:35 PM
30

Every appeal was denied, evidence was destroyed, and the only thing that got this man out was when another man voluntarily confessed. The system is so fucked.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 04:59 AM
0

Oppressed by boredom and not being allowed to work. Yes, I believe in it. It's not the worst oppression, but it's enough to make you miserable.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 05:15 AM
1

Well, they didn't like it one bit. And now they work. And you know what? Good for them. Have a little sympathy for your fellow humans. And yes, it's a weak definition of oppression.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 12:53 AM
0

No, technology took away women's housework (partially). That was the impetus for women's lib. Because they were bored to death doing nothing much at home.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 11:30 PM
1

The new officer made the mistake. Why should that cast a bad light on what other officers have done?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 08:16 AM
1

Yes, certainly women were oppressed. Not through most of history, and not horribly, but they were somewhat oppressed at specific times. Most notably, the 50s. This was a time when housewives had much less housework. They were bored to death and wanted to do more. But society wouldn't let them (and here I blame women at least as much as men). Fortunately "women's lib" fixed those problems in relatively short order as these things go. Women in the 30s had the same deal, and it wasn't a raw deal fo…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:14 AM
1

He told the woman that he had witnessed the whole thing and that I his professional opinion, there was no reason for an incident like the one she had created. Gold. Next time, get her ID, report her for attempted abduction, and sue for emotional trauma.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:08 AM
2

It's sad that people are forced into things they're not ready for. If he had the option to opt out of the child's life (financially and parentally), I suspect this child would be alive and healthy today.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:04 AM
7

Before anyone doubts, she was raped. Proven beyond a shadow of a doubt in this case. The guy had photos on his camera of her (and others) being assaulted. The police aren't always right. We know that. In this case they doubted the girl because, let's face it, she invited doubt. But they should have done their homework more thoroughly. When they falsely convict men, there's hardly any outrage. When they falsely convict women of a far lesser crime, they pay out $150,000 and get national media atte…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 06:59 AM
1

I'm glad someone wrote this up, but you can't listen to the station without noticing. National Propaganda Radio.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 06:46 AM
1

I don't believe the argument for my own reasons, but maybe you have a better reason.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 11:26 PM
1

What is the best rebuttal to the jet fuel / steel beams argument?
/r/MensRights21/10/15 06:18 PM
30

With all that's going wrong for men in the world, sometimes we catch a break. Whoever investigated this story at the AP is a hero. I don't know their name, but I'd like to learn. The real number of slaves is probably well over 3,000 because many were released quietly to avoid prosecution. There are some charities set up to help these guys, because they're coming home to dirt poor families and bringing nothing. Because they were unpaid. I'm not usually into foreign activism with so many problems …
/r/MensRights19/09/15 04:18 AM
4

You can write monsters like ~~monsters~~ to get the effect.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:11 AM
9

Why are some women so driven to make up a story when they have no idea what happened? My pet theory is that they've been so encouraged by "rape education" that they're ready to make something up to "do their part".
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:07 AM
1

We'll see. Things change after the primary.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 06:46 AM
1

The government turns a blind eye? They did for 20 years.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 11:12 AM
1

You can't say that feminists never give up on an issue after they've won. When was the last time you heard a feminist advocate for universal suffrage? Not in my lifetime, because most disenfranchised people are men. Though last election cycle I did see signs asking women to vote. Rather sexist if you ask me.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 11:06 AM
2

Substantially similar? But they're not. He's doing all the work. joking
/r/MensRights29/08/15 11:04 AM
1

They've already chased many of them out with their "protection from bodily fluids" rules. If the government demands less popular porn at higher prices, the industry will move out further. Having said that, all the desperate star wannabes in LA are quite the resource for any porn company.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 11:03 AM
1

Does that make the sign more or less ironic? They aren't intentionally adding a sexist message to their equality day chalk, but their very name is sexist. I think that's worse.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:57 AM
2

It's perfectly common in the North and West as well.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:43 AM
2

He's done exactly what he needs to do to win the primary. He's a good manipulator. The people he's pissed off are the people that don't matter to his campaign. If he wins the nomination, we'll see if he can pivot to the middle to win. Not that I'm excited about the prospect.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:38 AM
2

I think you can chalk this one up to elderly conservatives who fear new things. But SJWs agree with anything that puts men in jail.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:45 AM
2

Yes. 40 texts might be a huge warning sign or it might be fine, depending. But it's not stalking. In no way does it relate to stalking. That's like claiming spammers are stalking you. It's batshit crazy talk.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:42 AM
1

Hey, she's not 100% wrong about everything. That's not my standard, you know. She can be right on some topics and very wrong on others. She's making a very confused and misguided argument around the points mentioned in the title.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 02:14 AM
0

That's a very generous interpretation of what she said.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 01:17 AM
0

And porn is supposed to be patently offensive? And challenge political authority? I don't think so.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 12:48 AM
8

Makes some sense.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:01 AM
15

Could someone explain why it took so long to sue when America is so lawsuit friendly? The case is outrageous and just begs for a lawsuit. Are sexual allegations so toxic that being slandered as a jerk friend in a discredited story about rape on par with a multi-million dollar payday?
/r/MensRights30/07/15 07:18 AM
11

Yeah, "against anyone" is the whole puzzle. "Against men" is the missing puzzle piece.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 07:13 AM
1

Is that something you even want, though? To be the new "special helpless people?" I'm not sure that's any better than being the "special evil people."
/r/MensRights10/06/15 07:39 AM
1

I'm not even sure what to say about this. Clearly she feels that she deserves the money.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:20 AM
1

Everyone, men and women, can be good or awful. That basic belief is one of the things that separates us from a hate mob (i.e. feminists). The only reason people post women-being-awful posts in this sub is to counter the common and feminist belief that women are always good. They can be good or bad or most anything else. So please don't throw this on "us men." It's wrongheaded thinking and you can do better.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:36 PM
2

The just got raped by the legal system.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:32 PM
1

Sure, I know. I've known for years. But silent censorship is evil.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 10:14 PM
1

I confirm that all links to AMR are shadow-censored. This includes np and normal links. But it only happens in this sub. Is this something the mods of MR have done? Have the admins pushed this on us? Either way it's bad to censor without trace. This needs to stop.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:23 PM
2

np links are censored as well.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:20 PM
1

Lucky! You'll probably bleed out before the fire gets you.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:01 PM
0

This is, in a sense, a shadown-ban for that sub. Which is well deserved, no doubt, but I hate this shadow censorship. It's evil and wrong, just as feminists are evil and wrong. The only people who deserve shadow censorship are outright spammers, and they're probably not even people. Is this a new reddit feature? If not, what sub needs to hear about this news?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 07:55 PM
1

I'm not sure what you mean, but try for yourself and find out.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 07:51 PM
1

I can also confirm this. Just post the link in a comment and log out. poof gone.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 07:34 PM
4

Presumably you'd lose more than $7 when they upsell her ;-)
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:01 AM
1

For sure. We can all use a little more empathy and understanding for each other.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:54 PM
0

He wasn't very clear, but I think it forms part of your brain even though you can't consciously remember it. Some part of your brain remembers, and it changes how you perceive the world later.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:17 AM
6

It's amazing how much peer pressure can influence you, isn't it? You felt bad and ashamed for years, and now you feel fine. It makes it so clear how people can defend the practice on infants.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:13 AM
1

I agree, but pointing out the callous disregard for human suffering helps to frame the issue.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 12:46 AM
1

Would you like those changes to be revoked if they make you so uncomfortable? Without knowing exactly what you're referring to, yes. You can't honestly expect that anyone would welcome changes pushed on them from outsiders. Feminists are as much an outsider to men as anyone could possibly be. They're starting from the polar opposite of understanding and empathy. Able to post and welcome are two different things. Able to post is far better treatment than I've received from any feminist subs. I al…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 07:54 PM
1

No, I don't think I am. This is an important point, because we need to understand the enemy. Feminists are deluded into thinking that they're helping victims of white men, or at least that they're hurting the oppressors. And they're almost right; they do hurt men and white people. It's just that we're not oppressing anyone, and what feminists accomplish is injustice rather than balance.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 08:26 AM
1

Yeah, but in their minds they were helping. Just like feminists of today seem to think they're helping men, POC, LGBTQ, and women.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 08:19 AM
1

Hum, perhaps, but I've met some terrible people who were feminists in real life. As for feminists helping others, remember that feminists were big into helping gays before they had their own movements. They broke away from the feminists because they didn't appreciate someone else telling them what they needed, and someone else always getting offended on their behalf. The feminist movements to help men are the same. You're outsiders. You don't take the time to understand men. We really don't appr…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 07:16 AM
1

Somewhat off topic, but where does the blame belong? Assuming that there was a rape, and that it was obvious she was way gone, and that people saw it. That's the story in the media, so if that's true, what the hell?
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:25 AM
1

I haven't even spotted the video.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:23 AM
3

I generalize because it's generally true. As a thinking human, of course I'm aware that exceptions exist. As a feminist who's willing to talk, you're already an exception to the rule. In my mind I'm not pointing the finger at you; I consider you not a feminist, but a rational person who claims to be a feminist. You might wonder why I generalize the way I do. I've had extensive interaction with feminists online, and plenty in person too. I generalize based what I've seen and how I've been treated…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:21 AM
1

But what about after the election?
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:14 AM
1

I don't assume. I meant to write "fellow democrats" in the title but failed. My post was aimed mostly toward the democratic/left leaning members, but feel free to join in.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:13 AM
2

Not her genitals, but her politics.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:12 AM
11

Exactly. The feminist camp is pro-censorship. MRAs are not. The feminist camp is a cult of victimhood. The MRAs are not. The feminist camp looks for scapegoats. The MRAs blame people who actively advocate for our mistreatment.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 04:54 PM
2

Maybe she did it, maybe she didn't. We don't know because the police were goddamned liars. What more is there to say? The whole story is a shame, start to finish.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 12:48 AM
0

Yeah, my point is that some problems we have to live with, and some problems we need to live without. I have sympathy for anyone who honestly seeks the truth in any vaguely reasonable manner. Those who just seek to push their opinions on others under the guise of science can get bent.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 08:42 AM
2

They're all soft sciences, and they all have big problems. Even some of the hard sciences have big problems (notably biology). The topics they address are important and do need to be studied. They're very difficult topics to study and understand, and that has to be kept in mind. The key difference is that some of the soft sciences exist to turn opinion into "fact", while others are a genuine search for understanding. The latter deserves more respect than the former.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 07:26 AM
3

The debate follows this form: A: X beliefs aren't respected. B: Why do you think so? A: people's opinions (uncited) and (bullshit explanation of something I don't understand) and Scientism. Now, the point of such debates is to convince other readers of your position. Often in a hostile thread where you won't net positive karma no matter how you argue. You're not going to convince some online idiot on the spot; that's asking too much. Your opponent is pushing an opinion on completely unsubstantia…
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:24 AM
3

Ars is consistently hostile to mens issues. I'm surprised they published this article at all, but not surprised to see them cut off the end.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 10:32 PM
2

I'm always willing to entertain the idea of fraud, but you need more evidence than this. Here are a few ideas on making your argument more credible: Link to the official numbers so I'm not just taking your word for it. Discuss differences in methodology between the 2001 and 2011 censuses (hint: big differences.) Discuss margin of error. Discuss historical census accuracy. Compare previous census results to see if this trend is new, or if their number often jump around. If you cite the same sourc…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 02:55 AM
8

Best news I've heard all month, thank you. It's sad that our best victory in recent memory is the high court upholding basic human rights for men, but that's where our country sits right now. We're fighting for basic human rights against those who would take them away.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 06:33 AM
2

Not until the political landscape changes in this country.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 06:32 AM
1

If (D) men stay home, Democrats lose, guaranteed. Elections are incredibly tight these days, and they can't afford to lose much. (D) voters staying home does pressure the (D) party. Whether that's enough to change their party platform is unclear, but they'll notice.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 06:30 AM
0

As a gay man, your choice between two bad options is even harder than mine. I suggest you vote third party until the situation improves.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 06:27 AM
3

It's a fair question. While the (D) party supports feminism and all the endless problems that causes, the (R) party supports traditionalism which is also flawed. Feminism is a flawed system which could never work in any society, while traditionalism is a system which did work for people at one time, but doesn't fit the needs of modern society. Given a choice between the two, any rational person would choose a functional but flawed system over one which can't work at all. However, that's a false …
/r/MensRights31/10/14 06:23 AM
2

I've had to do the same. It helps that the Democrats aren't very different than Republicans these days; they both prefer executive power and secrecy.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:22 AM
6

This is basically true. I don't think the creators of reddit meant it that way, but this is what they created.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:19 AM
1

I wouldn't dream of speaking for you ;-)
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:39 AM
4

Is it just me, or do all those guys look like the "suppressed rage" type? Might I suggest anger counseling rather than blaming all men?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:20 AM
7

Not only is there a spectrum of beliefs, but the MRM encourages open discussion. Although most MRAs roll their eyes at MGTOW people, they don't get banned. Likewise feminists are also tolerated, and when they make good points or arguments they tend to receive net positive karma. Compare this to the feminist subs which eagerly ban dissenters. Our way is better.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:06 AM
11

Feminism.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 02:26 AM
1

I don't want to intrude on his privacy, but it should is helpful to have a real case to point to when discussing these things. It helps convince people there's a real problem. People who aren't necessarily inclined to just believe what we write online. Those are the sort of folk we need on our side if we ever want reform. So I suppose you can send him a note, let him know we think it's an important case that illustrates the real problems in the system. I hope he'll want to help.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 06:21 AM
1

That's beyond despicable. Still, I'd like some proof before I write that letter. Any chance of that?
/r/MensRights08/05/14 03:11 AM
0

I knew someone would have an even better idea.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 04:34 AM
2

They updated the site without much hassle, quickly, and did a decent job of it to. A-. Lost marks for not catching it themselves, but good fixes.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 12:29 AM
0

Yes, I understand the situation. I mostly left this sub when they changed the rules, but sometimes I feel like visiting still.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:16 PM
0

This was just her way of distracting attention from the real news story. How the White House has a "gender gap" just like everyone else. I know this is rude, but Jennifer was born a woman, right? pic
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:05 AM
-1

Humans don't go into heat like other animals do. Male animals don't go into heat at all. You've very confused. I suggest writing less and reading more.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:01 AM
0

I'm not convinced. Most adult women I've met outside of Uni aren't competing on their sexiness. In fact, the whole concept of "alpha" with women is a more vague concept, because they don't operate in social hierarchies. It's true that women compete for group influence, but again that's not based on who's hot.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:58 AM
2

As Riktrat said, it's impossible to eliminate wars. If it was possible to eliminate war, it would be catastrophic for our long term health as a species. Of course, so is Nuclear war.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:53 AM
0

The women found legal grounds for retrial. Presumably the man did not. Since they were separate trials, that is plausible. This is one of the most fucked up cases in recent American history, so I'm sure you can find more fucked up aspects.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:25 AM
0

Yes, and the reason is that the admins want to ban the MR sub.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:13 AM
44

This is a classic case of "hostile work environment." It's what lawsuits are made of these days. You have two real options. Hire a lawyer. I'm not sure this is realistic if damages are low, because obviously you won't want to pay for the lawyer. Find a civil rights group willing to do "the test." It's very simple. Next time that Subway advertizes they're hiring, you have 20 men and 20 women call / walk in / whatever to apply. They should be pre-qualified to ensure the test isn't too biased. If t…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:54 AM
10

I'm sure they allow Subway to pay 23% under minimum wage, right? ;-)
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:46 AM
17

And miss the chance for a minor media shitstorm and lawsuit? Come on!
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:45 AM
1

Yeah, quite a few people mentioned this. It's still a good example to show how things can go wrong.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 06:57 AM
2

I'm an occasional reader here, and I also like to follow the MRA critics. Those critics, despite being extremely angry and sarcastic, do often have valid points. Those critics have the following to say about this article: Misters use "Women control 80% of spending" to claim women have all the financial power. When the 80% figure is debunked, suddenly it becomes a feminazi lie. Nobody in this thread has used the word nazi, so that's out. I certainly heard the 80% number from feminists, so I think…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 10:12 AM
1

This program was just a surprise bonus. They didn't mention it before freshmen showed up for classes.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 10:02 AM
4

I'm a leftist and I fully oppose programs like this. There's a lot of room for the left and right to agree here.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 10:01 AM
3

From what I've read on this reddit, feminist ideas have strong and widespread support in Universities throughout the first world. Canada and Europe have the same problems we have. This program was quickly shut down. I think this is more of a University issue rather than a national one.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 10:00 AM
1

The program was short lived. While they threatened kids with expulsion, it's not clear how they could have followed through. Some people have mentioned that there are government rules around expulsion.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 09:58 AM
1

They'd insta-ban this article as non-feminist. If you posted a neutral article, I expect a 50/50 split for and against the method this program used, with landslide support for the ideas they tried to teach. Tweak the implementation to be one shade less totalitarian and you'd see 75% support easily.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 09:55 AM
1

This UD is a victory for, well, civil rights more than anything. This program was defeated and the UD faculty aren't eager to try again. Even so, a great many people still believe this was a great idea. We will see these sorts of programs tried from time to time.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 09:48 AM
1

Does that justify regressive programs like the "progressive stack" used in Occupy Wall Street?
/r/MensRights07/01/14 09:44 AM
2

Sure, but it's fair to talk about race separately.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 09:42 AM
6

Glad to know there's no racism in Tibet, Sri Lanka, or Rwanda.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 10:45 AM
2

Why?
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:31 AM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:10 AM
1

When visiting the forum site, no posts are visible. Why would people join if they can't see anything? I didn't.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 10:16 AM
4

The study of 70 men (!!!) used to dehumanize an entire gender. This study corresponds to what evolutionary theory has already suggested. It's about everyone doing the best they can with the hand they're dealt, with the goal of having kids and grandkids. We're on men's side here, but let's not deny that some guys are better XYZ than others. Let's not imagine that every guy sparkles in every aspect of life; that just ain't true.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:56 PM
2

Fanelli and Ioannidis suggest that it's because behavioral sciences don't have a robust set of theories, in contrast to traditional biology (which has things like evolution and genetics). Don't misquote.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 06:09 AM
0

As long as people are circumcising, it's a good thing if they minimize pain and bleeding. It'll be decades before we can ban the practice, and religious groups will have exemptions. This study is a good thing.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:26 AM
2

Couldn't agree more, but this community giving up is not losing a battle. It's just surrender.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:37 AM
1

I seriously question if the person is going to be open-minded when it comes to gender equality. You failed to do any research there. I'm one of the moderates here (or, I was). You can check my history for that. I fully understand why the mods capitulated, and I fully disagree. I'd rather find a new home than continue with our tails between our legs.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:37 AM
1

Way to capitulate. Unsubscribing.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 02:39 AM
4

I can't point to an outright racist line in the comments (yet), but the overall tone is borderline.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 01:04 AM
6

He knew she was lying? Do you have a source for that?
/r/MensRights05/08/13 12:59 AM
19

Another impossible standard for men to follow. Don't buy drinks for an intoxicated person? Most people aren't trained to know what that means. I don't even know what that means. Do you? Go ahead and define it, and tell us key signs. Such laws should apply to professionals (bartenders) and not to common people who lack the required expertise.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 08:15 AM
24

Went to Walmart. Encountered crazy. Surprised.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:26 AM
7

If you've never been the victim of a surprise crime, you probably wouldn't understand. This happened so quickly I bet the guy was more shocked than anything.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:23 AM
3

That's the kind of thing that burns bridges. Yes, it's quite inflammatory. Closed minded Feminists can't understand how that phrase offends the people they're oppressing.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 01:59 AM
3

A little heavy on the stereotypes. I suppose guys who become babysitters despite the prejudices are more likely to play with kids.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 01:58 AM
0

Many first world countries are facing catastrophic population declines in the coming decades. If you don't want your first world country to shrivel into an also-ran, you should encourage your population to have more children.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:10 AM
2

You thought prison was bad? Just wait until you see your child support! I expect he'll have to pay 300% of his income.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 07:36 AM
2

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transsexual are oft-persecuted sexual 'orientations'. They generally collaborate to advocate for equal protection under the law. We don't talk about them much because their dedicated advocacy groups are more accepted and more effective than our own.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:39 AM
4

It's true that gay folks normally have their own advocacy groups who do a much better job advocating for gay people than we do. That's probably not true for Eastern Europe. I don't think gay women are subject to this level of harassment in Russia.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 12:28 AM
3

"lgbt women" is pretty broad. Generally lesbians/gay/bi women aren't targets. Trans women may be, but I can't really say. Gay men are an easily defined target for a lot of this harassment and hatred.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:43 PM
23

Gay men aren't our main focus here, but they're still men and deserve equal protections. This bullying with government approval really ticks me off. Remember to click other discussions.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 06:34 PM
2

I haven't heard of any such cases.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:11 AM
7

Sure. All my local coffee shops for one. Hooters for another. Wait, against women? I haven't seen any female garbage men, but they probably don't apply for the job.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:52 AM
4

Why? These people are still ignorant of the mechanism of sex determination at conception.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 09:52 AM
2

I'm glad we can agree there. On your topic, maybe you could tell me why or if you think raising both genders the same is good. Is this going to benefit them later in life?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 08:57 PM
2

That's interesting, but again you're talking about subtle issues when we have more important problems. Girls are 50% more likely to attend university than boys, and the gap is widening. That's an urgent issue. Do you see the urgent gulf between your topics and ours?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:16 PM
2

He must be living in a denial bubble. I really hoped my message would get through, too.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:39 PM
4

If you don't like this sub, perhaps /r/egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:16 AM
2

You know, it's nice that you're sort of on our side, but I can't help but think that your Feminist beliefs mean you're trying to save us from imagined oppression while ignoring the very real oppression we really face. Every male faces discrimination in the education system. Every male lives in danger of false rape accusations. Every male faces stiffer penalties in the justice system. Every male is presumed guilty if there's any domestic violence. Let's fix those real problems before we bother ta…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:15 AM
1

You wouldn't be hiding in your car if that's what you cared about. You might even cheer. It would be much less creepy.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:03 AM
1

Correct. And every word applies there too. If it's just a businesslike interaction, it's kind of creepy.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:02 AM
1

A "professional relationship" is trading money for service. These tend to be light on human interaction, because the service provider is trying to be friendly but mostly shallow. If you show up at practice to ogle the athletes, it's like they're providing you a show and you're paying nothing. It's not the worst thing in the world, but it can be creepy. Add some actual human interaction and you improve the whole situation.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 12:05 AM
10

The post doesn't criticize Feminism. I do. I would consider women to be underprivileged in this situation (clubbing and bars) You have got to be kidding. Women have all the privilege in clubs and bars. They pay less (or no) cover. They get to skip lines when the bouncer lets them. They control the social interactions. They often get free alcohol from the guys, with no obligation. The staff might be mostly male, but the entire system is set up to make women happy. The women come to clubs that mak…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 12:02 AM
0

I'm familiar with that research, but it's only one source. Who's to say that women on OKC didn't feel compelled to rate men against a "standard" of good looks rather than their personal opinion? Perhaps something is lost in photos compared to in person interaction, when it comes to women. Actually, I know quite a lot is. Women are often attracted by personality or other factors far more than looks. So I'm back to my original point - repeating that statement demoralizes men and insults women for …
/r/MensRights21/07/13 08:35 PM
3

It's vaguely inappropriate in the same way that old Wunderkind show was. There's nothing explicit or outright wrong, but the whole video is creepy. Just the way they planned it.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:24 PM
-2

most women only find the top 20% of men attractive Why does this get repeated so often? In my experience women have individual taste in men. Different women are attracted to different looking men. There are absolutely women who love chubby guys, short guys, effeminate guys, gym rat buff guys, skinny guys, and normal guys. This sort of statement demoralizes men and insults women.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:13 PM
0

That's a professional relationship. You're paying for medical skills.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:09 PM
68

A fine example. Woman are always presumed to be innocent victims. It's one of their privileges. This is a story of women abusing privilege. It's natural for anyone to abuse privilege, which is why we fight against these outdated notions. It's vexing that Feminism fights for these sexist privileges for women.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:06 PM
1

Some women may have also been held prisoner, but they were inside the house in better condition. Wherever you draw the line on this one, it's pretty fucked.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:33 AM
2

Another highlight: vigilante nurses castrating men in Delhi.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 07:40 PM
1

In general, I agree. For targets like tumblrInAction, who we mostly agree with, let people participate easily.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 05:51 AM
7

Exactly. The link should be a np.reddit.com link. Remember this for next time.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 08:19 PM
1

Of all links, why is this one an np link? Are MRAs really going to spoil/troll/pollute tumblrinaction?
/r/MensRights19/07/13 08:13 PM
3

I bought a car.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 05:41 AM
10

From my experience dealing with car salesmen, I disagree. I guess we have one opinion each way; stalemate.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 05:35 AM
3

In America pregnant parents tour hospitals. Accommodation for fathers is a selling point on these tours. Does England lack choice in hospitals?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:46 PM
2

You really don't need pills if you're socially aware.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:41 PM
1

Then we can all get with ugly women because our judgement is impaired "better"?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:40 PM
1

Insightful. How do you think this effects society?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:39 PM
2

And considering what young black males probably endure while living in rough neighborhoods Was he from a rough area? I'd hate to just assume.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:07 PM
8

A woman spoke up in his defense.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 12:57 AM
5

The PSAs are good. Sometimes babies are really infuriating. It's good to remember how easily they're hurt.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 12:56 AM
-10

That performance is better than I'd expect from a horribly overworked public defender with no resources. I'd be frustrated as hell too.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 08:19 PM
3

didn't witnesses say both TM on top of GZ and the other way round? Yes, they did. The clincher was the gunshot residue analysis which showed convincingly that TM was on top. ...but you just said he followed TM. If someone's following you from a distance, you've got options. Call the police. Knock on the next door and ask for help. Call out and ask why he's following you. Go directly home and lock the door. You could probably think of more ideas. Attacking the person is not self defense, because …
/r/MensRights17/07/13 08:08 PM
12

The general consensus is that GZ was following TM, and TM ambushed him. This is based on available evidence. Witness and expert testimony show that TM was on top of GZ and beating him, when GZ pulled his weapon and killed TM. What exactly did GZ do wrong here? He was watching an unknown teenager from a distance, awaiting the police. Is that "wrong" in a high crime neighborhood? Is it "wrong" to defend yourself when you're pinned and getting your head slammed? Explain your thinking.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:55 AM
1

The odds of pregnancy after "just once" are pretty low. The odds of a miscarriage before 3 months on a first child are pretty high. You could get lucky. If she has the child and won't share custody, you could probably use that to keep her from pursuing child support.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:52 AM
1

None of this advice is good. The contract means nothing, and why would he marry this girl?
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:49 AM
13

As a liberal, I agree. The left has gone crazy over this case. I think it's a tragic incident, but Zimmerman wasn't in the wrong.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:13 AM
4

Is that a joke? Testosterone effects so many things. You can't simplify it like that.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:09 PM
2

Only further research will show if there's a real bias on their part. Even the most evenhanded people will look bad at some snapshot in time.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:07 PM
7

A healing dose of Feminism
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:01 AM
7

When your organization discusses a motion to enforce sexism, it's time to bail. You have some deranged people in charge.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 10:50 AM
1

Uh oh, someone fed the Femi-monster. Now it will eat everything!
/r/MensRights04/07/13 10:47 AM
0

I don't have an SRS link, but they said it was linked. Who knows.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 08:29 AM
3

I'm not worried. I just think it's fair to let OUR people know about the biggest thing happening in our forum right now. I had finished with the post, so I only knew because I saw it in bestof. The official rule for brigading is that it's not a "brigade" unless they're telling people to downvote.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:00 AM
2

SubredditDrama Bestof AMR linked there also (we can't link back).
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:54 AM
2

You should see the anger when I made this case in another forum.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:27 AM
2

Did I miss the part where she said any dolls were bad for girls? Because I thought she said the opposite.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 03:08 AM
1

I'd be happy to help, but I won't be on the same side as Feminists. Fortunately for women, Feminists a real PR empire and can help these women out more than we can. Good luck to the women in these states, and might I suggest you vote some other party into power next time?
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:06 AM
11

I found this answer: I'm not going to comment on the sexism or anything but you may be interested to know there's a reason the sentence was so light. It was part of a plea deal to get the mother to give up her parental rights. If you can believe it, she wasn't going to. It was in Dani's interests that the mother be removed from her life ASAP and no further contact ever happen. In order to do that, the authorities let her off light. Here's the quote from the 2008 story about this. Bernie and Dian…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 11:21 PM
2

Just like all accused rapists, her name shouldn't be published prior to conviction. Or at least wait for the paternity test results, which make the case a slam dunk.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 11:14 PM
3

Visitation centers serving child(ren) and adult victims of domestic violence are in a position to: provide a safe space for children to visit with the non-custodial parent; help keep child(ren) and adult victims of domestic violence safe during exchanges and visitation; hold batterers accountable for their violence and abuse during visitation and exchange; be part of an expansion of services to support child(ren) and adult victims; and provide access to meaning referrals. Mostly likely none of t…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:55 PM
1

Sorry. I keep trying to watch the video but it just won't load for me.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:31 PM
1

You're right, it's nowhere near a leading cause of death or incarceration for men. It's still a known and oft-mentioned way to attack a man. It's common enough that a lot of men fear these accusations, much like a lot of men fear going to the kiddy park without their wife (but with their kid).
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:11 PM
-4

Alright, I'm willing to bet this is one area where Feminists beat regular college women.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:08 PM
1

Does any of that other physical evidence help to prove rape? The only likely candidate I saw was the nail pick, though if he was scratched that would be plainly obvious.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 09:53 PM
1

DNA evidence only (mostly) proves that sex happened. It doesn't prove that it was rape. What do you do that you've spoken to judges, prosecutors, and detectives about rape?
/r/MensRights03/07/13 09:29 PM
1

I think you made good points, but I think this shows the eagerness jurors have to overlook weak evidence when rape was alleged. As for the prison rates, 0.7% of Americans are in jail. If you assume that 5% were innocent, that's about 1 in 2,800 people wrongly in jail. Considering how awful wrongful convictions are, that's not very rare.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 09:27 PM
10

Aside from that travesty of justice, this is a good news story. The girl is doing much better thanks to loving adoptive parents.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:55 PM
1

Darn WSJ. I found it through Google News. Sorry the link broke.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:40 PM
1

The complaint is that quite a lot of wrong convictions happen. The Innocence Project has proven that, and those guys were all sentenced to death.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:38 PM
1

All of your numbers are SOMA. If you assume something, then a conclusion naturally follows. What if we assume that 85% of reports are either malicious false reports or clearly not rape? What if we further assume that 25% of reports result in a conviction? Oh my, that doesn't look good, does it? I think nobody should ever be convicted on he-said-she-said with only evidence of sex. If there's no further evidence of rape, you can't convict. But it seems that people do get convicted on that basis. B…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:35 PM
1

Exactly. Men are giving to men and women. Women are giving to women.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:07 AM
2

I don't appreciate how he insults liberals, but at least he raises good points. The truth is that those are just conservative talking points. Marriage is a lot more important to most conservatives than economics, and that's what you see in their arguments.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 09:23 AM
15

Yeah, it's a shame we're not willing to concede much, but our political opponents are crazy hardline. I'm more than willing to come to reasonable compromises when compromise is on the table.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 09:12 AM
1

Sure, sure. Wimbledon sells seats to watch really good tennis players. The prize money is for being really good at tennis. That requires a ton of work.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:53 AM
3

They're both gossip, but gossip serves an important role in society.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:36 AM
2

They just don't realize their own unconscious bias.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:27 AM
2

Just this week, the Supreme Court handed down two decisions that impose troubling new limits on when sexual harassment claims can be filed. I'd like to hear more about that!
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:26 AM
4

I hear that all the time, but I also hear about a lot of wrongly convicted men. What evidence do you have that: if it's only he said vs. she said it's hard to convince a jury that there's "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the crime happened. ? It seems like juries are eager to convict accused rapists without much evidence.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:21 AM
2

The jury can only judge what they're given.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:19 AM
-1

Feminism doesn't give a shit about innocent victims. Unless of course they're women. So that they can use those victims as propaganda to demonize all men.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:10 AM
6

I also suggest you talk to COTWA. They've been a very reliable and levelheaded organization dedicated to this issue.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:09 AM
6

What a good news story. Shitty shirt available internationally, MRAs campaign against it and actually win. We have so few victories. In time we'll step into the big league with more meaningful victories.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:04 AM
-3

female tennis players get paid more per hour than the men? They probably put in the same amount of practice time. That's the real work they're paid for.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 07:59 AM
1

You don't have any grounds to tell us what the word means, because we're the victims. We know what the word really means, while you hide behind bogus explanations. You lying to yourself with your definition, but we know better. The Fem in Femsplain is short for Feminist.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:32 AM
1

404: actually a worse article.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 09:14 AM
2

I'm sympathetic to your cause on that point. Where's your sympathy for our cause?
/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:47 AM
1

Hah, well yeah. All these gender issues eventually come back to the building blocks of our lives. Learning to read is quite the building block.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:17 AM
2

Here's the book on the subject.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:08 AM
2

Even if the panel was Feminist free, I think boys would benefit from a male perspective in reading selection. If the women choose a list of books that only apply to girls, the boys won't be interested. This is an MRM issue.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:04 AM
15

Let's do our best to help ensure that "sexism sells" never becomes a marketing mantra.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:01 AM
2

How is this an uplifting story? I believe that children are better off with two parents, so it's a little sad he had to use a surrogate. Apologies to any gay folks or single parents. One good parent, or two unconventional good parents, is sure a lot better than government care.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:00 AM
3

Let me explain how I read your post. Perhaps it will help you to understand why we don't agree. I'm sorry, but many black people have an uncalled-for hatred of the term "nigger-rigged", often because they seem to not understand what it precisely means. It has nothing to do with black people fixing something temporarily. It does not mean "all black work is worthless and only white people can fix things." Nigger-rigged refers to when a black person "fixes" something permanently but in a temporary …
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:29 AM
2

Guys, WTF? The author is not a Feminist, and she has a valid opinion on the matter. She doesn't share your opinion of the term because she's not caught up in the gender wars. Re-read that article and remember that she's not a man hating feminist.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:18 AM
3

The moral of the story is this. While Feminists fight for the rights of women, they're only too happy to take away the rights of men. That's why we despise Feminists.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:06 AM
2

$16K? Wow, I think competition could bring that price down. What's the MRM angle here?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:00 AM
1

Yeah, I have to call bull on this one fred. There's literally no news covering this story. What coverage you'll find is clearly from anti-vac camps. southweb.org has zero credibility.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:57 AM
5

Sure, but you're far stronger if you can counter with cited facts.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:51 AM
2

https://www.facebook.com/gfnotallowed - semi creepy but obviously jokes. https://www.facebook.com/mybfnotallowed - more creepy, some of them don't realize it's a joke. Also a lot more likes. Overall I give both pages a "meh".
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:24 AM
3

https://www.facebook.com/gfnotallowed
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:19 AM
1

They've done this because women take longer, and the women's bathroom lines were obnoxious. Sure, they should both be unisex. This isn't done out of malice, but because someone didn't think things through. On the plus side, you can just use the women's bathroom too. It's single occupancy. I do this pretty often at gas stations, because the gendered single occupancy bathrooms make no sense.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:18 AM
3

You're right, and also incredibly offensive. Might want to work on that.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:56 AM
3

Yeah, come on. The difference here is that you can't escape these comments. Most women you meet don't know each other, but they can quickly find each other through this app. One poisonous ex with a terrible (but clever) review can send the women running. Or maybe you got a "good" review that attracts creepy stalker girls. Either way, you can't escape the app if you're still on facebook.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:53 AM
17

Great example of the Feminist paranoid echo chamber, where every man is a rapist and every stupid woman is a victim.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 11:32 PM
6

Well, now we have solid evidence. We're now better prepared for their attacks, thanks to skepticism.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 09:30 PM
5

Yes, we wouldn't be having this conversation because: It would be mainstream news A male adult would have a harsh sentence1 The child would not be liable for child support 1 Okay, maybe we would talk about that point.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 09:29 PM
3

That actually happened here. They held the father (still a child) blameless until he turned 18, at which point he was responsible for his childhood actions. Namely, getting raped.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 09:27 PM
1

Yeah, I've heard stories too.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 09:22 PM
1

Being a lawyer isn't about serving justice anymore. It's about winning. So nothing has changed since lawyers were conceived?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 09:22 PM
5

I'm pretty sure police were invented to suppress young men. So, nothing about this is new. If you want to ask a real question, try this: Why are bad male behaviors crimes, while bad female behaviors aren't?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 10:11 AM
6

You're like a broken record. Always saying the same thing. Somehow always relevant, too. Keep it up :-)
/r/MensRights30/06/13 09:53 AM
3

At least your position is consistent. A consistent judgement either way is better than the sexist status quo. Keep in mind that a lot of us aren't arguing against your position (even when it sounds like we are), but against the implicit pussy pass double standard. Men get jail time, thus it's disguising that women don't get the same jail time when violating the same laws.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 09:19 AM
2

He wrote elsewhere on his website that his job situation doesn't allow for it anymore. He hopes he'll be able to resume protesting soon. I also heard he was recruiting protesters.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 07:15 AM
1

I'm glad you called out this obvious but often overlooked sexism.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 07:12 AM
7

I still find this hilarious... and true It wasn't presented as "just a joke" at all.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 07:12 AM
1

If he was 19, why is he serving in a youth detention center?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 07:09 AM
1

these are comparable sentences, she's looking at up to 36 months.... She's a repeat offender. The crime isn't comparable at all. The fact that she wasn't put on the sex offender registry is the reason she could rape again.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 07:08 AM
1

14 and 19 is a big gap. Not only that, but 14 year old boys are a lot less mature than 14 year old girls. She's a serial offender, she deserves to have the book thrown at her. No where in the article did it say because she's a female Yeah, people don't go around admitting those things.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 07:06 AM
7

The law isn't written that way. Why don't prosecutors apply the law equally?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 07:04 AM
1

the wife was only motivated to do it by her husband Is that somehow equivalent to "not guilty"? She still did it. That she would not have done it had he not forced her to Riiiight.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 06:59 AM
15

Thanks to perpetual_C000009A for digging this up, but it needs more exposure. This is a ruling by an appeals court, and it matter for precedence. Meaning that next time the situation comes up, they'll do the same thing because that's how courts work. Here's the previous story about a 15 year old boy and a 34 year old woman in Nebraska. It just got a lot more plausible.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 06:46 AM
-1

Even having them on a digital medium puts the kid at risk. At risk of what?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 09:09 AM
1

Well, give us a link.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 08:06 AM
1

Yeah :-)
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:39 AM
1

I think only the person who has it the very worst deserves any rights at all. That's how it should work, right?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:32 AM
2

For each item on the survey, ask yourself if women are perceived as the likely victim (if you cross out male). Whenever the answer is "yes", AMR thinks that's also a valid issue for men to worry about. Whenever the answer is "no", AMR thinks those are pointless concerns. How do you explain that coincidence?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:18 AM
1

No doubt.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:10 AM
4

It's funny you mention that you're not against men's rights, because the AMR survey says otherwise. People can check each idea they support, including Men's Rights (but not as it currently exists). About 25% clicked that, plus about 0% for MRM as it exists. Survey says: AMR really is Against Mens Rights.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:09 AM
4

I didn't say that, but you are the hatiest hate sub around.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 10:54 AM
5

AMR is Against Mens Rights. They visit us and talk about us constantly. We're not allowed to link to them.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 10:29 AM
3

You sure put a lot of effort into that. Good work. There's no justice for any of us unless we're civilian and rich, and the military is mostly male. Certainly a MR issue.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:11 AM
3

This isn't much to go on.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:09 AM
9

Hum, only women and children are victims. It's like some kind of pattern we've seen before. But where's the part where only men are violent? Oh look, right there on their website. Yep, another anti-male sexist DV campaign.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:08 AM
-19

TL;DR
/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:03 AM
9

Here's the issues they found least important and most important. You'll be pleased to know that they really really care about domestic violence, rape, gender stereotypes, and birth control. When talking about men's rights. I can only imagine that they're thinking about issues that apply to women, and projecting them onto us. False rape allegations? Ultra unimportant, and in fact they'd like to throw extra men in jail for good measure. Education discrimination? Fuck boys. Male disposability? It's…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:00 AM
1

He's also sentenced to 18 months in jail, but the sex offender registry is worse. He's a dumbass, but aren't most 20 year olds? (sorry) Since men tend to prefer younger women, and women tend to prefer older men, situations like this will mostly apply to men. There's no justice in CP charges in these situations, none at all.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 06:26 AM
3

I'm not concerned for Physics. They'll be a very hard nut for Feminism to crack.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:41 AM
0

Looks like a user submitted tip to me. If so, I can't really blame Clorox.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:30 AM
3

You can also see who uses the app and defriend them. Yes, defriend anyone using the app. Then ask yourself, why are you using Facebook?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:28 AM
1

I don't get why you complain about being offended for being called a racist when you call someone black or oriental? Is black some awful word? It's no different than white, just a skin color. It's a lot more accurate than African American, since we all came from Africa. Too bad about the job, might I suggest you move somewhere more accepting?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:25 AM
4

At what cost? Irrelevant. We're talking about what Feminism has done to help anybody. women weren't stuck doing a few jobs, they had the opportunity to do other things but chose not to for various reasons. In the 50s? Yeah, right. Until the government comes in and fucks with things. You know there are hiring quota's in place. I don't know any such thing. I think we're done here. You're just acting crazy.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:20 AM
0

Until proven otherwise, no.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:18 AM
7

The next day I receive a text from her telling me that I raped her because I didn't stop when she told me to. Welcome to the MRM. You can thank Feminism for this one. Advice? Hire a lawyer, file a defamation suit, and subpoena those text messages before they expire. You don't want to wait for her to file actual charges against you, because she's attacking you even now.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:16 AM
6

a lot of women aren't taught anything about cars That's valid, but how is it men's fault? If you want to learn about cars, you're allowed to. And some women do, such as the woman in the video. She's not the only one. So why don't any women stop to help? And why does she blame everything on men?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:13 AM
1

I say that because I haven't seen it really help women's sports. Women's college sports teams have nice facilities, good coaching staff, and the tools and manpower to help them improve. They actually have a budget. This helps them play better, and it's good for female athletes. The main difference is that we actually have women (plural) working these jobs. That's a neutral fact, not inherently good or bad. When women were stuck doing just a few jobs, they couldn't choose to do more. Now they hav…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:07 AM
1

Title IX didn't do shit to help women's sports, all it did was handicap boys sports. You're saying it didn't help women's sports at all? What on Earth makes you say that? the main difference from the 50's and before to now is that women have programs to get them into positions instead of having to work their way up. The main difference is that we actually have women (plural) working these jobs. There's a lot more workplace equality than there was before.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:58 AM
5

2 downvotes already for this positive story. I wonder about people here.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:52 AM
2

And they all get off That's not true at all! From the article: White was given a six-month suspended sentence after admitting charge Uh, nevermind.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:50 AM
2

When have they improved anyone's lives? In the 60s I think. Now women have their own sports teams (Title IX) and can work any job. They also protested for the right to vote back in the 20s. Can't name anything positive they've achieved recently.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:48 AM
8

There's a new r/atheism? The reason we're hated is that people say we're evil. It's that simple. That's how every genocide has ever worked. That's how wars work. It's the main Feminist attack on our ideas. Feminists see themselves as fighting "The Patriarchy" which is code for men. When we critique their ideas, that's an attack on women and "hateful". When we critique actual Feminists as seen in the wild, that's an attack on women and "hateful". When we ask that people pay attention to men's iss…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:44 AM
7

I'm pretty sure none of us get heard, so your argument is flawed.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:40 AM
9

This problem will solve itself. If they select inferior candidates, they'll lose more elections. Here's to stupid.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:38 AM
3

My circumcision was botched leaving my urethra to be slightly obstructed so when I piss it looks like an out of control sprinkler. As an American I only piss standing up when I'm outside or don't have to worry about soaking an 8 foot radius around the toilet. Yikes. a ghostly little gadget called a Spuk – a spook – attached to the underside issues a verbal warning to prospective standers. I don't even know how this is a MR issue, but man it's fucked up. Apparently it's because their toilets suck…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:32 AM
3

No. McCain-Palin was a nightmare ticket. I am encouraged to see him support common sense here, at least. Let's hope either major party runs a good candidate one of these cycles.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 11:53 PM
1

Yes, that's why I carefully chose gender neutral terms. As for the survey showing that only 10% had pimps, remember that the OP and article are talking about pimps. It also doesn't tell me if they got started through a pimp. One particularly interesting quotes is, About 45 percent got into the “business” through friends. I would guess that many of these "friends" were actually pimps. I understand that's how it usually works.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 11:45 PM
14

The judge said the extensive suppression orders were solely to protect the victim's identity. If it was a man his name and face would be on the front page of every newspaper before the trial had even begun. You're right, but so is the judge.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:45 PM
1

I support legalized prostitution, but you're going to need a lot more than "yet another example" to convince me that most prostitutes aren't manipulated into it. Most of the pimps who talk kids into prostitution are just in it for the money, and those kids are going to lead messed up lives.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:42 PM
6

This is what it is like for men to date in America What makes you think this is common? I've never known anyone who had such an experience.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:37 PM
5

WOWK reporter Charlo Greene attempted to oppose the gag order on behalf of her employer. However, she was unable to deliver her petition, a Logan County Courthouse bailiff threw her out — twice. Greene was also threatened with arrest for obstructing an officer, the same charge Marcum currently faces. This is not how you win in the court of public opinion.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:34 PM
11

Great, an actual lawsuit will have both sides putting facts on the table. I'm especially interested in the statistics behind this claim: Yu claims all students at the once female-only college in Poughkeepsie, N.Y., are “invariably found guilty” if they are accused of rape.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:31 PM
32

He asked me to be in a sexism video. I thought it sounded like fun Red flag. I go out to dance, people come up and grind on me Not my scene, but that's how flirting works in super loud dance clubs. Choose a different venue if you want different flirting (or no flirting). Next, they faked a broken down car. A bunch of guys stopped to help her, but when it was Mike, nobody stopped to help. If you pay close attention, she's complaining about her own privilege here. She complains that the guy who we…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:22 PM
7

The art of politics is not saying that sexist, racist, hateful thing you really believe. She said it, and now her electorate is going to wonder if the next woman who runs believes the same hateful crap. Way to strike a blow for, er, against women!
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:15 PM
16

You could've looked at the carnage of your mother, aunts, older siblings and rejected it. It's been going on the last 30+ years. Maybe I'm being too harsh. You've truly built a majestic career as the fundraising coordinator at the American Red Cross of Punxatawny, the director of social work at the United Way of Fall River, and the drone, replaceable worker at XYZ interchangeable company. I'm sure you are single because of all of those hours you spent on Facebook bitching about how slow it was a…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:12 PM
5

This is just a shouting match. A better reply would have mentioned that these politicians are a reflection of the electorate who voted for them. That electorate consists of men and women who oppose abortion. (insert polling numbers on abortion views). If you argue like that tumblr guy, you'll never convince anyone.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:04 PM
1

Anyone have a mirror of the offensive article?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 09:53 PM
5

There's a world of difference between nudity and sexual imagery. I think women should be allowed to walk around topless. I think topless calendars are presumably sexual, and don't belong at work. So... I agree with the straw Feminist on this one.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 06:19 AM
2

Blind to gender? I don't think that will ever happen. We all want something from one gender.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:10 PM
3

No, school shootings cause violent video games. I heard it on CNN.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 07:36 PM
1

Right, okay.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 05:54 PM
2

Actually a shortage of nurses has been a problem. I heard it pays alright though.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 05:54 PM
1

Yes, exactly. Works great.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:47 PM
1

It is a rarity to find any city or town primarily using a lift system. Those rare places include everywhere I've ever lived. I suppose you could be right though.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:17 PM
10

PavlovsCat refers to bad apples... like herself. The point is they so vastly don't have it, and it's so deeply ingrained, and Stockholm Syndrome runs so deep, that solidarity and kicking continued ass is really called for here. I wonder if she even realizes that she's the very model of Feminist she claims is fringe.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:08 PM
2

So... is she referring to actual events or is she just paranoid? I for one will not remember her as the woman with the large ass. I certainly won't mind if men's health issues are considered.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:59 PM
-3

Is trash collection that hard? They mostly use mechanical lifts these days, so it's not that much manual labor like years ago. I haven't seen anyone doing the job as x30Jx describes it.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:53 PM
-9

I didn't say nursing was dangerous, though risk of disease and lure of drugs is a risk. I said it wasn't easy. Look at my other post for details.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:50 PM
-2

Compared to most jobs. Imagine you're a nurse at a care facility for disabled people. They're either stiff as a board or completely limp. You have to move patients around for their appointments throughout the day. That means hauling Mr. Spaghetti and Mrs. Stiffy into and out of wheel chairs. It's a physically demanding job.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:49 PM
-1

It's downvoted to oblivion. Nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:41 PM
8

Well I agree, but don't assume nursing is easy work. It can be pretty tough.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:10 PM
63

Did I read that right? Equal pay for different jobs? Because they could theoretically hold similar jobs? Would someone explain this to me please?
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:05 PM
15

She said she was "proud" to be the nation's first female prime minister and despite the attacks she says she suffered, she thinks over time it will get easier for women to hold the top job. I'm proud of Australia for booting her. A less venomous woman will have an easier time with this job. Toxic feminism to be sure.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:57 AM
55

"Thanks for giving me a 5, and thanks for telling me about mensRights on reddit. What a great resource, I've learned so much about sexism and civil rights. Really, I can't thank you enough. Maybe I'll see you counter-protesting someday!"
/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:26 AM
9

Be sure to send a very nice reply and thank her for pointing you towards such a fascinating civil rights forum.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:24 AM
10

A shit test is another term for bad behavior. Sometimes the right answer is to walk out.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:21 AM
1

he said to assume that all women want to be ravished. Which, last I checked, was still one of the most commonly cited sexual fantasies of that demographic... I won't argue with you, except to mention that your statement would draw complaints too.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 08:17 AM
1

From now on you must ASSUME that she is attracted to you and wants to be (overwhelmed with emotion). I don't think it's what he meant. He probably meant something like, "have amazing sex", which is a strange combination of the two major meanings behind ravish. As for the rest of your comment, we're obviously using different dictionaries.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 06:06 AM
2

PUAs aren't the enemy. They're just freshmen students in the college of life. People do grow out of PUA in time, just like people grow out of Feminism never.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 07:53 AM
1

From now on you must ASSUME that she is attracted to you and wants to be ravished. rav•ish (răvˈĭsh) v. To seize and carry away by force. v. To rape; violate. Just putting that out there. He actually did call for rape, though he probably didn't intend to. It's always good to know the meaning of words you use.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 07:51 AM
3

She assaulted them with a glass bottle, and they merely pushed her off the property? What about the next poor guy she attacks with glass? Once she pulled the bottle, they should have knocked her flat and sat on her back until police arrived to arrest her for assault.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 07:47 AM
3

I upvoted you, but only for pointing out that UC Davis isn't UC San Diego.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 07:21 AM
0

Legally you're right. In actual human relations, it's entirely ambiguous. Usually everyone leaves happy and nobody thinks they were raped.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 07:20 AM
4

The university revised the figures in 2009, reducing by more than half the number of incidents reported for each year. At the same time, the university's reports to the federal government said assaults on campus were practically nonexistent. So, uh, there were no incidents so they cut the numbers in half just to be safe?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 07:18 AM
2

Another article on ACE. Here's a video series. These ACE results are the case against no-custody divorce. Even if that's your only ACE, you're at higher risk of alcoholism, depression, DV as an adult, liver disease, smoking, rape (later), suicide attempts, teen sex, and being shitty at your job later. That's a goldmine of results.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 07:51 AM
3

I was really confused when Gardasil came out and was only meant for girls. I realize they have the most obvious and personal benefit, but why not vaccinate everyone? We all benefit from the vaccine.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 07:31 AM
3

It sounds about right to me. A full child custody battle is estimated to cost even more. Justice is for the rich.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 03:05 AM
2

What do you think a top quality legal defense costs?
/r/MensRights22/06/13 02:20 AM
6

Trannies are okay, mostly.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 12:12 AM
2

Find it. Find it now. We must know!
/r/MensRights22/06/13 12:10 AM
1

According to that, we're more like 5x the size of SRS.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 12:10 AM
2

Yahoo Answers is a cesspool.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 12:07 AM
3

The "crimes" of Penny Arcade: Dickwolves If you use the word "cis" I probably will hate you too Mike mocked "trigger warnings" How does it feel to support rape culture? Didn't you know honey? You married a rape apologist! Guest comic strip appears on PA You get the idea. Now these douchebags are capitalizing on the story to talk about how they're not showing up for the Penny Arcade Expo (a really big deal in the game world). Yeah. Thought you'd all be interested. Here's PA's blog post from today…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 11:43 PM
1

I'm talking about writing a letter to their sponsors. I'm not (yet) talking about boycotts or anything. I think their sponsors might be interested to know what they're paying for. I really don't see any moral problem with that.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 09:13 PM
1

Okay, three points in response. One, this is what our political opponents always do. We're hamstrung if we don't use that tool. Two, it's very effective, which is exactly what our small movement needs. Three, I really can't understand why you'd pull punches against a group advertizing that men are the problem. The shelter they run probably doesn't accept men, and their poster clearly implies that men are the problem. Isn't this what we're out to solve?
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:57 PM
4

Excellent work; a very inoffensive letter. Odds are they won't care. I suggest you also write their major sponsors and the school. If they can't advertize at schools, their mission will be imperiled and they'll have to shape up.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:54 AM
1

Honestly I don't know. I'd really like to have a pithy phrase to describe this, something I could shout out in public and people would understand.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 11:32 PM
4

We elected Bush. Twice. Strange things happen.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 10:36 AM
3

It takes a very special kind of nastiness to assume that the presence of a quota must mean the absence of merit. TIL common sense is nasty. No wonder so few have it.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 10:32 AM
1

I didn't see things that way at all.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 10:17 AM
18

Dare I ask, is this "rape culture"? I don't believe our general culture tolerates this, but some small groups do. Is it wrong to call that "rape culture"?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 10:03 AM
2

Yeah, we've had enough of these interviews in the last few days.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:58 AM
3

Nobody has ever said "going brokeback", and "bromance" has nothing to do with sex. I think the implication is very clear. He made that shit up, and you dodged the call for evidence. Evidence: I know what it means. OP knows what it means. Most every definition of bromance mention that it's not sexual, and that's because it's so obviously sexual without the actual sex. Take this example, 10 Signs your Guys is in a Bromance, which lists a series of homosexual associated behaviors. Look at this defi…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:49 AM
5

I agree. Anyone who implies that male friendships are gay needs some public shaming. Humans are social creatures and friendship is absolutely necessary and good. These insults aim to take away our social bonds, and are the worst sort of attack.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:27 AM
6

How does "bromance" imply sex? They put "bro" in it to mean it's about male bonding, not sex. Movies about "Bromance" don't have gay sex in them. Seriously? And so what if people hint that you might be sexually interested in men? This is a good thing for men who actually are. They can be less shamed for it. Show me how anyone has been shamed out of hanging out with friends this way. I'll bet this actually means you're being treated as more open minded. No, it's intended as an insult. To be shame…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:22 AM
13

It's like the Victorian era.. but only for men.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:18 AM
7

I posted a plea for people not to downvote your AMR stupidity in public. That's an award of sorts, isn't it? The more people see you, the more they'll hate you.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:49 AM
6

Remember guys, the best result for MRAs is to make such hatred visible, followed by a highly visible response to tear it down. Downvoting it to -65 doesn't help anyone see how crazy AMR/Feminists really are. Please stop downvoting.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:47 AM
3

Not a troll per se, but an AMR regular.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:45 AM
0

If you enjoy such comedic posts, remember to upvote them to spread the joy. It's alright to upvote SRS posters for being stupid, so don't worry.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:31 AM
1

Alright, just for fun. Tell me the extent of your options.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:47 AM
2

No, PUA is an over-correction. Someone who remains a PUA is just as crippled as someone who remains passive. I would hope that people who become PUAs also grow out of it.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:42 AM
1

Troll.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 12:26 PM
-2

Absolutely, yes. That's the reason the PUA community exists, to educate young men about normal human interaction.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 12:24 PM
1

The couple should own portions of the house equal to what they put into the mortgage, and any major labour the man does on it should be paid for out of the equity of the house. Okay, but like I said you two have no savings right now. The house has some equity but it'll take months to sell. The divorce just got finalized and it's time to move out. You're looking for a job. Haven't found one yet because the local economy is in a slump, but you will. What are you going to live off until then?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:14 AM
1

I respect that position as a counter to current alimony laws which go too far the other direction. In all fairness, sometimes temporary alimony is called for. Take this example. You're married (3 years), and your wife just got a decent paying job. You don't have much savings, but you've managed to buy a "fixer-upper". You're pretty good with carpentry and electrical work and your current job just ended, so you spend 8 months fixing up the house. Whoops, you two aren't getting along anymore. You …
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:59 AM
4

That's not exactly an MRA position. That's a PUA position. They have a point. "Nice" guys don't really stand out from the crowd, and they're also likely to be shy. Those qualities result in rejection. In reality, those type of men were never on the list for any woman to marry them. There's a list? Link please?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:42 AM
1

So you'd like a young, healthy, fertile looking woman to not have kids with?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:35 AM
1

Awesome.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:18 AM
2

If they merely report the numbers, I can avoid the bad teachers.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 09:54 AM
2

I saw the study. I'm far more interested in my local teachers and their biases.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 09:53 AM
1

Woah, it's vanished. It's was /r/feminism but it must have been deleted.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 09:49 AM
-1

IKR
/r/MensRights19/06/13 04:38 AM
-3

If you say so. They must practice a far milder form of feminism than the subs we focus on.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 04:37 AM
2

Some temporary alimony is fine depending on the circumstances of the marriage. Since he died right after she won an increase in alimony, he was probably being squeezed too hard. Alimony should be enough to get someone back on their feet, not a lifestyle.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 04:33 AM
0

Sure. A lone Feminist voice at the moment. Having not met every Feminist, it's a little hard to say anything true about every last one of them.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:12 AM
6

Messed up girl doesn't have baby with guy she's unsure of. Probably a good choice.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:11 AM
2

though I never brought it up with him Maybe it's time you did.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:07 AM
3

What an amazing act of forgiveness. I sure wouldn't have forgiven her.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:05 AM
1

Before you accuse someone you'd better think twice Yes, think twice. If you're falsely accusing someone, you might someday have to pay some of that money back. The implication is that true accusers had better think twice, and that's a load of horse shit. The only reason she lost is that she was on tape admitting her lies. I think about it because I prosecuted sex crimes and usually, it's very rare that a victim just makes this sort of thing up No, it's really not that rare. If you never saw this…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:02 AM
1

4k hits for Feminism on the internet? Please.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:51 AM
1

We didn't just come off the boat. We know a huge lie when we see one.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:44 AM
5

I'm honestly not sure which party is worse for Men's Rights these days. They're both rancid. I can't give either party my vote.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:41 AM
11

What a great idea! Schools should report how frequently male and female students are punished by each teacher. They should also publish the average male and female grades by teacher. It's not perfect, but there's nothing like showing discrimination by the numbers!
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:35 AM
5

It's not that breast exams are bad, but where's the love for men and men's health issues? To put it another way, am I the only person who just won't buy any product with a "pink ribbon" on it?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:30 AM
3

That first article was interesting. It sounds like he ran up the bills and committed suicide just because he was bitter about how much alimony he had to pay her. I can't say I don't sympathize some.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:28 AM
6

You're not supposed to link our fan club.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:24 AM
2

Would we applaud someone from the KKK who wrote a similar essay under a web site called "the New White Supremacy" that advised other members to give black people a bit of a break? Yes? Any sort of progress is good, right? Of course the KKK is dead and gone now, but back in the day...
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:16 AM
1

Yeah, they probably turn up the voltage. It's just men suffering, so who cares?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:14 AM
4

Well look at that, someone submitted it to a feminist sub. And it's not even downvoted. EDIT: well look at that, they deleted it from /r/feminism. Jackass Feminist mods as usual. Deleted submission
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:13 AM
-2

Yeah, episode 1 made me puke.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:10 AM
0

I love this article. The topic is so mainstream, and the point is so clear, that all the forums can talk about it. So, who's talking about it? madmen (first submission) MensRights Egalitarianism (by ryepdx again) TwoXChromosomes Any of the Feminist subs? No? I'm shocked. Feminists don't want to talk about male rape. They don't want to talk about guilty women. They only want to talk about innocent women getting victimized by society, and the bad men who victimize them.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:10 AM
1

He badly overreacted, but slowly became more reasonable. Meh.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 06:59 AM
1

That's nice, but could you all stop standing on me? Thanks.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:59 AM
1

Yeah, too many edits. was will spent.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 06:18 AM
1

Was will spent? ?
/r/MensRights17/06/13 04:24 AM
6

OP doesn't mention sports.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 11:00 AM
7

I've met people with HIV who have sex. They told their partners, who agreed to the risk. Anything less is pretty evil IMHO.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 08:25 AM
2

That's why people really struggle with child care
/r/MensRights16/06/13 08:24 AM
1

Most any semi-large city, USA. I agree, it's ridiculous but that's what things cost here.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 05:01 AM
8

"She's just a woman." It's the thing Feminists purportedly argue against, but they really don't mind.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:01 AM
9

This thread 1 2 is a typical of arguing with Feminists. She chose to cite Illinois as a state where it's a crime for women to rape boys. I cited a very recent example of a female teacher who had sex with a 16 year old male student, and was will spent 11 days in jail over it. Thus proving that even in states where envelopment is rape, it's not much of a crime. Anyone think she'll agree with me? Anyone. P.S. don't bother downvoting.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:11 AM
9

Oh come on. She obviously meant that men need to babysit women 24/7 to prevent this sort of thing. Because apparently women can't stop rape.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 01:13 AM
1

No doubt.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 01:07 AM
3

You're correct. Discriminatory laws can result in discrimination by the government (when enforced), while actual discrimination is always actual discrimination.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 12:58 AM
2

You realize that "de facto" is what effects people, while "de jure" is not?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 12:46 AM
11

Story from 2010 but it's on the frontpage now. Most of the discussion is critical of her and her pathetic punishment. The actual article is entirely sympathetic to her. She gave a guy HIV but that's okay because her father wasn't perfect and she fell in the wrong crowd and she's sorry.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 12:35 AM
6

There are options other than costly daycare. If it were so easy, poor people would certainly take advantage. Instead I see them paying a lot for expensive daycare.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 12:20 AM
14

Some people claim that transsexuals are harassed by police quite a bit more. Do you think that's true?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 12:14 AM
4

Here it's $1800 per month for a terrible daycare where they ignore the children. Sounds like your area is subsidized.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 11:49 PM
3

Cringe worthy. The MRA/MGTOW derailed things first, and not in a good way. Made the Feminist look pretty reasonable.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:45 PM
3

It's like speaking to a child, isn't it?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:40 PM
1

I am not listening to 70 minutes of spew. TL;DR please if anything important was said. Also, backstory?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:37 PM
3

club'em-and-drag'em days Which never existed, joking aside.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:32 PM
2

ETA?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:28 PM
8

That's a good point which we often overlook. Presuming that he consented to have a child, and presuming that the wife doesn't make anything like six figures, and presuming that he's going to keep making a lot of money, it seems reasonable to expect more than 1K/mo in child support. Daycare alone costs twice that.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:24 PM
5

The Judge will consider you as evading service, and will allow for some other form of service. Such as serving your mother and waiting a month. This is common. You will have to deal with this suit if she pushes it.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:22 PM
4

I think those numbers prove they're able to bury new threads before they catch on. That thread was their top post, and nowhere to be seen over here.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 08:32 AM
74

Too bad you lost two friends, but they wouldn't have been there for you when it mattered.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 04:07 AM
1

I for one can't imagine why nobody hits on this woman. She has such high regard for men.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 10:14 PM
1

Leverage? It's really tough to fight for a fair divorce when you're in prison and your wife controls all your assets. Also, women don't suck, the system which encourages this sort of abuse sucks. The women who give in to the easy temptation to make false accusations do suck, but we can't fix them.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 07:36 AM
1

She works with the victims from these films, and they're really raped and really underage? Then she's talking about kiddy porn, not rape fantasy porn. Generally, if you see kiddy porn you were looking for it. Kiddy porn is already illegal. No further laws required.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 07:34 AM
2

It's a plant based toxin. It's been known since who knows when. Even so, it's nothing like Sarin or whatnot.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 06:16 AM
2

It's going to take a long time to change the world. Evidence: this video.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:32 AM
1

This is merely an extreme example of women accusing men of crimes during divorce. I agree that we don't need a million examples, but you won't find a million examples like this.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:25 AM
2

It doesn't say that directly. It's partially our assumption, because she was about to get a divorce. More facts might come out in the weeks ahead. You're welcome to argue your perspective too.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:18 AM
1

You're not wrong, but what about the postal workers who may have handled the letter? She certainly put lives at risk, including her husband. Speaking of that, what of the ricin in the fridge? Good thing her 5 kids didn't get into that jar.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:17 AM
1

Not actually treason, but still a valid point.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:14 AM
1

She probably made it at home.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:12 AM
3

Find a political action group able to sustain outrage for the 10 years required to get anything done, who doesn't use some sort of hyperbole. We can model ourselves after them.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:08 AM
5

Both genders are within margin of error for both years. All this really tells us is that everyone's working harder (and for less).
/r/MensRights07/06/13 07:57 PM
4

The message is designed to be "edgy" and offend the easily offended. Yawn.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 09:50 AM
1

it does violate OP's conditional consent Having sex in a way you don't consent to, leading to a child you don't want. Sounds a lot like rape actually.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 07:44 AM
1

You're allowed to have that opinion. I think it would be more productive if you were anti-extremist though. There are a lot of Muslims out there. If portions of society hate each other, we're going to have big problems.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 07:39 AM
4

Right now, I think you're fucked. If you're super lucky, you can record her confession that she stole your sperm. In that case, get her charged with rape. Offer to get charges dropped if she aborts, and then don't drop the charges. Plan C is to figure out some sort of contract where she takes all responsibility for the child. That may not be legal in your state. Plan D is to have her charged / sue for rape, and subpoena all her communications. Hope you get lucky and she talked about stealing spe…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:52 AM
1

It's known to clog drains.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:46 AM
6

Yes, he is.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:45 AM
2

Sure, but he suspects it's his. What if that's true?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:45 AM
6

Want to stop all this crime? Decriminalize. This is nothing but a traditionalist morality crusade, which Feminists happen to eagerly support. Prostitution has always existed (even in animals), and will always exist. When both parties agree to a deal, there is no victim. The state has no business in these matters, and only hurt people by getting involved.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:42 AM
1

Huh?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:40 AM
3

Your comment as-is doesn't add to the discussion. Maybe you could elaborate?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:34 AM
-2

You can do better than this.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:07 AM
0

What a pile of Feminist lies. Lie 1: Men are more likely to be abusive than women. Lie 2: Fathers don't matter in children's lives. Feminist conclusion: Keep those nasty men away from our kids! We have to fight each of these lies, and not back down.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:06 AM
4

Why would you post that comment?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:58 AM
6

As COO of Facebook, Sheryl Sandberg (Lean In) is ultimately responsible for policy. She's responsible for censoring anti-Feminist material on Facebook. She's responsible for refusing this subpoena. This woman needs to become unemployable. Don't worry, she'll be rich after this job, but we don't want her in a position of power and influence because she's an anti-male Feminist. I look forward to their contempt of court finding.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:58 AM
2

/r/offMyChest
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:52 AM
5

Young guys in pickup trucks hate her Hijab. A reasonable person might realize that the Hijab is a Muslim garment, and assume those guys are anti-Muslim. A Liberal Arts major with zero real life experience would assume they're sexist pigs, and use that idea to insult all men. In the hard sciences, we're trained to base conclusions on facts. This woman wasted her education, and came out less than she started.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:46 AM
2

Those aren't the only trolls, or even the main trolls we get here.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:37 AM
3

According to the guide, this is a situation where I should insult you. Douche.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:36 AM
3

One fun strategy is from a human relations class I took at college. Believe it's called clouding? Basically if someone makes a negative statement you make them answer for it in a way that makes them really give a good reason, usually resulting in it being made apparent that they are just being a jerk. Example: "You're dressed like a bum" "What makes you say that?" "Well you're wearing a polo shirt in the office" "I'm not sure I understand you still, why do I look like a bum?" "You're wearing a p…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:30 AM
1

Sounds like a conspiracy theory, and you haven't made a compelling case.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:16 AM
1

Liberals are about half the population. You can't honestly paint all liberals as anything.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:07 AM
-1

Nobody understands Liberals these days. Liberals have muskets, okay? And we don't fire until we see the whites of your eyes. Two Young Twits.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 07:51 AM
1

We have so many unsung heroes. Thanks for this uplifting video, because we focus a bit much on bad behavior in here.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 07:45 AM
2

Some of you don't get it, so I'll explain. This app is gossip. You know what people say in gossip? Bad things about everyone. Women don't like other women stealing what they've claimed, even if it's over. She'll tell everyone how awful you are. The only exception to this are the campus hunks, who all the girls will fawn over. In summary, the hunks get to be sex objects, you get to be slandered.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 07:35 AM
0

The blunt answer is, it's required by law (Title IX). Maybe someone can tell us the history behind the laws.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:31 AM
12

If anyone has effective tactics, make a post. I've tried for a long time. The best results I get are when the Feminist just doesn't reply, usually after a particularly strong argument from me. How do we do better against people who call us "Men's Rape Advocates"?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:25 AM
2

It's apparently only allowed to spontaneously fall in love Stalker and flirt with her initially. Sexual harassment. Nice try Xenoith. They've got all the bases covered.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 11:23 AM
5

Good, once they've separated male and female murder, we can reduce the penalties for female murder. They'll call us evil bastards, but we'll know in our hearts that they were trying to do the same to us.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 01:19 AM
7

The main irony here? A Feminist website has come to agree with PUAs and /r/TheRedPill on a basic fact of life. Don't let them know!
/r/MensRights03/06/13 01:12 AM
1

Each gender has several sexual strategies. Settling down and making a family is a strategy both genders sometimes use. Sleeping around is also a strategy both genders sometimes use. Teen men in particular are famously not monogamous, so I can understand why these "gamer types" (whatever that means) might have a skewed perspective.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 01:11 AM
6

Since sex is rape, the photo is "rape propaganda" and you're an aspiring rapist.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 01:05 AM
4

This author has such a gentle way of ripping Feminism a new asshole.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 12:44 AM
6

Assault is wrong. Handle it however you want. Shaming, police, a stern lecture, never talking to that woman again.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:51 AM
1

Brigading and doxxing are the shadow-bannable offenses on Reddit.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 06:38 AM
1

I agree. On the flip side, don't force yourself to feel victimized when you don't actually feel that way. Really think about your emotions here.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 06:14 AM
2

Read all her comments. The bipolar girl didn't really blame the manager anywhere in there.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:59 AM
2

His speech.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:55 AM
2

No, it was a theme throughout his speech. He laid all blame for all DV on men several times.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:54 AM
4

No. They're miffed because he essentially calls all DV the fault of the man. Here's the video. We know both sexes are to blame for DV, and we don't like it when all the blame is pushed on men.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:53 AM
0

Mrs. Stewart, it takes two to make an argument That's mostly true. Overall this speech is alright. He certainly places all the blame for violence on men, when we know both sexes are to blame. Given his experiences, who can blame this guy? He grew up in a shitty situation because of PTSD.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:51 AM
2

Great! I can actually contribute to this.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:33 AM
1

Not sure which gets more complaints, but too large is certainly not good.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:31 AM
3

If you are not on Facebook, please join Facebook is going to censor AVFM, so join Facebook? No, let them die a slow and messy death. They're already on the downward path. As for activism, who can point me to an in-person activism club? Enough of this internet activism.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:28 AM
6

This study has deep insight into a smaller number of people, and comes to a different conclusion than larger studies which don't know their subjects at all. Too bad it's not a slam dunk, but they're on the right track here. A few problems with the article, women hold nearly two-thirds of low-wage jobs Like, teaching? Unlike, mining and construction? By choice. if there was no discrimination present in the labor force, women and men would be making the same amount across the board. ... if they ma…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:19 AM
1

Legally, that's sexual assault at a minimum. What really matters, and often forgotten, is this. If you don't feel raped and violated, let it go. It will do you no good to think of yourself that way. Your emotional well-being is most important, don't forget that.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:56 AM
2

So they don't care about injustice against men because there's more injustice against women? I hope their hearts don't split open with all that compassion.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:52 AM
2

++
/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:51 AM
6

Chicago Family Wins $1.3M Judgement For Son's Botched Circumcision. The jury really cheaped-out on that one.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:09 AM
0

But 68%? I think your typical women isn't really into cars, and probably doesn't care all that much aside from a few key things. I'd guess at a number closer to 40%.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:59 AM
2

Yeah, that's what I meant. Doesn't that seem strange and untrue to you?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:53 AM
22

68% of new car purchases are made by women? I'm skeptical. The only explanation I can think of is that men are more comfortable buying used.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:03 AM
14

Did my male ancestors run the world back then? Because nobody ever told me.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:16 AM
2

a single mother in the UK makes more from the state than most men can bring in That can't be true, can it?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 04:16 AM
1

You have a point.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 04:14 AM
19

Welcome to the 2010s folks. As so many Feminists hear their biological clocks blare like an air raid siren, the me me me, women women women club is attacking men for not knocking them up. These are the same Feminists who put career before family. The same Feminists who treat men like shit. These Feminists absolutely don't need men, except to knock them up, stay home to take care of the children, pay for everything, and then move the fuck out when your wife doesn't want you anymore. But keep payi…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:39 AM
10

Don't be mad, she's really doing you a service. She made it very clear that she's insane, right in the advert! You know exactly what you're getting into here. I wish all crazy roommates would do this!
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:25 AM
22

I'll be sure to keep your opinion in mind if I ever get drafted. If that happens, I'll get a tattoo: Armchair isn't the pity, for a veterans soul. People will ask what it means, and I'll have to say I don't know.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:39 AM
5

Is growing up in jail worse than foster care? I'm not so sure. I don't have a problem with babies in jail, if the father doesn't want to take the child. Things must get awkward by age 6 though.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:07 AM
18

I disagree. The perception that only men fight wars will change when the facts on the ground change. Right now, only men fight wars is essentially true.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter