TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EeeeeeevilMan Archive

View 35 posts and 527 comments by EeeeeeevilMan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3563

FeminismEeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:11 AM
508

EeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:08 AM
439

Marriage/ChildrenEeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:03 AM
388

FeminismEeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:34 AM
381

DiscussionEeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights03/12/14 12:24 PM
353

Red Pill ExampleEeeeeeevilMan/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 06:23 AM
255

Blue Pill ExampleEeeeeeevilMan/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 06:20 AM
227

OutrageEeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights26/08/14 06:02 AM
163

Blue Pill ExampleEeeeeeevilMan/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 05:09 AM
158

EeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights31/12/13 06:46 AM
133

Red Pill ExampleEeeeeeevilMan/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 04:51 AM
119

Blue Pill ExampleEeeeeeevilMan/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 05:39 AM
108

EeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:45 AM
106

Social IssuesEeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights19/07/18 10:41 AM
100

Red Pill ExampleEeeeeeevilMan/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 10:06 AM
91

GeneralEeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights29/11/18 06:36 AM
84

EeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights27/01/17 05:31 AM
79

Blue Pill ExampleEeeeeeevilMan/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 05:16 AM
79

Blue Pill ExampleEeeeeeevilMan/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 04:29 AM
78

GeneralEeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights27/05/15 05:46 AM
71

Marriage/ChildrenEeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights06/03/18 08:25 AM
68

Blue Pill ExampleEeeeeeevilMan/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 07:26 AM
54

DiscriminationEeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:32 AM
53

Blue Pill ExampleEeeeeeevilMan/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 02:49 AM
48

Blue Pill ExampleEeeeeeevilMan/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 05:24 AM
36

Blue Pill ExampleEeeeeeevilMan/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 04:08 AM
33

EeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights25/03/18 02:53 PM
31

Social IssuesEeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights19/04/18 10:40 AM
9

Not ReallyEeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights15/10/19 08:59 AM
3

Blue Pill ExampleEeeeeeevilMan/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 04:01 AM
3

Blue Pill ExampleEeeeeeevilMan/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 06:53 AM
1

EeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights27/01/17 06:45 AM
0

EeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:05 AM
0

DiscussionEeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights28/10/14 03:08 PM
0

EeeeeeevilMan/r/MensRights24/12/13 07:44 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Loosen one of the nuts on the toilet seats so it slides around when they sit down.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 11:55 PM
19

As far as being able to get any woman he wants, he is Richard the Lionheart. The dude could pull thousands of women who would worship the ground he walks on forever. Instead he got a cunt.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 12:19 PM
9

If he were a celebrity woman who beat up a man he wouldn’t have even suffered the little career blip he did. Yes, rich people get off easier, but there is still a gender bias in favor of women.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 02:37 PM
4

Rich men get away with crimes like this and sexual assault all the time, it's way more to do with fame and money than it is to do with gender Go ahead and show me one single male celebrity that’s openly admitted to drugging, sexually assaulting and robbing women who still has a career. I will wait. Chris Brown's been doing shitty things publicly for so many years now Yes, and while that sucks he hasn’t been held accountable he still gets more shit than a woman who did the exact same things would…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 02:33 PM
12

Boy this is weird, too. Just like the other top comment above, this commenter doesn’t seem to be active in r/mensrights and has only posted three comments here, all of them some form of concern trolling. Could we may stop upvoting obvious concern trolls?
/r/MensRights09/12/18 03:29 PM
1

Boy this is weird. I can’t seem to find a single post or comment of yours besides this one in r/menrights. Good job upvoting the concern troll, everyone.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 03:25 PM
2

If he was a woman and even did really peep on other male colleagues would she have been arrested? Of course not. And the guy shouldn’t have gotten arrested or gone to jail on such a minor thing that was he said-she said with no physical evidence. But that doesn’t mean we all have to stop using our brains and not recognize that this guy has a flimsy story full of holes. Which is why this guy is not a good example for men’s rights issues. He’s clearly full of shit, just not to a legal certainty.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 12:39 PM
2

You’re 100% right and shouldn’t be downvoted. This is clickbait. Here’s a previous article I found that goes into more detail and makes the dude’s story sound fishy as fuck: https://www.getwestlondon.co.uk/news/west-london-news/met-police-officer-spied-female-15494180
/r/MensRights06/12/18 12:32 PM
2

There fixed it for you. Don't get emotionally manipulated by the news outlets! I’m not being manipulated at all. And you clearly didn’t read the article I posted or you’d see how fishy as fuck his story actually is (or you’re so biased it’s hopeless). Here’s the Reader’s Digest version from the article I posted: Dude goes into a woman’s bathroom while someone is showering. Woman claims she sees him peeping and confronts him afterward. He stays in the stall for half an hour and when he comes out …
/r/MensRights06/12/18 12:28 PM
15

I’m an MRA (feel free to peruse my posting history to confirm), but this guy didn’t get arrested for going into a woman’s toilet. He got arrested for peeping at a woman showering. And there’s a lot more to the story. I don’t believe him (although I don’t know that I would’ve convicted him either without more proof). Here’s an article that gives a lot more detail: https://www.getwestlondon.co.uk/news/west-london-news/met-police-officer-spied-female-15494180 The dude was straight up peeping on the…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 07:07 AM
22

She accused him of being a pedophile for being quiet. The only advice should be “Dump this crazy person.”
/r/MensRights29/11/18 07:30 AM
16

I disagree, but that’s because I think it’s a biological instinct in men specifically, not because women are horrible people.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 09:30 AM
7

It extends to any time a woman does something bad. I lurk r/relationships all the time (I know, I’m sick) and a constant, infuriating thing over there is: If a woman comes complaining about her husband acting terribly, he is roundly condemned an asshole. But if man comes complaining about his wife’s bad behavior the response is always—and I mean 100% of the time—that “There must be something else going on!” Because assholes just don’t come in the female variety.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 10:41 PM
2

They both supposedly cheated. Her with Quentin Tarantino and him with some model whose name I can’t remember. AFAIK, it was never alleged that he cheated with their nanny.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 04:23 AM
128

It boggles my mind how there are people who actually do believe that. Just put them in an office full of women for a month or two, or a floor full of nurses or whatever. It’s just constant emotional warfare, backstabbing, etc. Somebody’s crying literally every day.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 04:12 AM
3

You didn’t look then. Literally the 6th top comment, heavily upvoted: The worst thing you can do is "want to talk about this" when she wakes up. Even after she wakes up. Let it go first. Get her water, Gatorade, aspirin, whatever she needs to get through the initial hangover pain. Be nice, but dont push or press the issue. Once she starts feeling better then her brain will start working. She'll remember. See what happens then. Then you can get a read on what you should be doing. But whatever you…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:24 PM
11

I didn’t make it out to be black and white at all, nor did I say there was no one condemning it. I said that the majority of the comments are not treating this like the divorce-worthy event it is and like they absolutely fucking would if a man did this. It is disgusting and indefensible.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 01:05 PM
16

Yeah, what could male disposability have to do with this sub?
/r/MensRights22/04/18 03:41 PM
0

People take care of their terminally ill or invalid parents all the time. I’ve done it twice. So have millions of others. It’s not even remotely as rare as you people are making out in this thread. She’s a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:51 AM
1

He’s a quadriplegic who likely has brain damage. He’s not going to live “decades.” And she couldn’t even stay however long he would live.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:49 AM
1

Three fucking years, though? All these people below you saying, “Everybody says they’d be the good person but they’ve never done it!” Uh, I fucking have. Both my parents are dead now and both died long protracted deaths that took years that required constant daily care from myself and home health. It was miserable and draining and I’d do it for them again in a heartbeat. And if my wife fell the same way, I absolutely would for her as well. So can I call her a piece of shit now, guys? Because she…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:47 AM
1

Well, we don't know much about the stepfather, but we do know that supposedly the son is good, upstanding, nonviolent, clean record. That's evidence in his favor. Yeah, it’s all in his favor if you ignore the evidence that he assaulted someone and the cops thought he was enough at fault to arrest him which means it likely wasn’t self defense. Sorry dude, but you’re the one with bias clouding your judgement here.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 03:23 AM
1

Seriously. I mean, it might legit be that the stepfather is at fault (like he started the fight or something) but without info from the cops or the kid there isn’t enough to assume anything. But they just all immediately assume the eeeeeeevil stepfather must’ve been abusing that kid.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:13 PM
4

If it had been a stepmother doing the same thing, it would still smell like that. Bullshit. If that kid had beat up his stepmother over words, nobody would be blaming the stepmother and accusing her of instigating it.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:10 PM
3

Would you say this if some kid beat the shit out of his stepmom? I doubt it.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:08 PM
6

There’s also this ridiculous idea you can see along the commenters that they all somehow have pedophile radar, like they can spot one by just how “creepy” a guy is. When, in reality, the guy molesting their children is more likely to be the otherwise upstanding citizen that no one suspected.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 03:15 PM
1

Sounds more socially retarded to me. Plus, all the other stuff she described about him makes it sound like he may be autistic or have Aspberger’s or something. Either way, if a socially retarded woman watched normal porn in private and loved children, nobody would leap to child predator. It’s insanity. These idiots have this stupid idea that they can spot pedophiles by how “creepy” they are. In reality, the guy molesting your kid could be the otherwise upstanding citizen you never suspected—whic…
/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:06 AM
5

I disagree vehemently actually. I don’t love Trump, but this is the only thing that might actually get us some traction. We weren’t exactly winning the fight for men’s rights before this. We were already hated, when we weren’t ignored. With Trump we may still be hated but they can’t and won’t ignore it.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:03 AM
0

There are so many of you guys in this thread saying this. Are you not aware of Betsy DaVos and Title IX reform? Google it if not. There was no advantage for himself in doing that.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:01 AM
4

He installed Betsy DaVos and we are getting Title IX reform because of him. You are just wrong, dude. I don’t love everything about him either, but you are letting your politics blind you here.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 06:57 AM
2

This always generates a lot of salt here at r/mensrights when I say this but: a vote for Democrats is a vote against men’s rights. I understand that we have a lot of otherwise socially liberal MRAs here—I’m one myself—who can’t stomach a lot of what the Republican Party stands for. I get it. And I feel the same way. While neither party is exactly what you’d call “pro men’s rights,” know this. When it comes to men’s rights comparing the Democrats to the Republicans is like comparing the Black Pla…
/r/MensRights15/02/18 06:47 AM
22

Imagine if there hadn’t been a camera in that room. This guy’s life would be ruined. He would be unhirable and everyone he knows would think he was scum. Women should not have the power to ruin a man’s life with mere words.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:50 AM
79

I love these graphs, but I’m going to give the same nitpick I do every time they’re posted: The colors should be changed to pink for women and light blue for men. Yes, it’s stereotypical as fuck, but most of us are already conditioned to see those colors as masculine or feminine and it makes it easier for people to visually track the data without having to go “Wait, which one was white and which was black again?”
/r/MensRights19/11/17 01:33 PM
48

Also, another reminder, Lena Dunham also falsely accused a man of rape in her book and had to publicly backpedal under threat of lawsuit. Not to mention the whole molesting her sister into her teenage years thing...
/r/MensRights18/11/17 04:39 PM
159

I’ll just leave this here: https://imgur.com/r/MensRights/HGAWA8k
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:16 AM
21

I guess? The article makes it sound like the shaking was just her yanking the baby when it was falling or something? But that doesn’t sound like enough to do so much damage. I don’t know. That article is garbage though. No details at all.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 11:18 AM
50

I don’t understand what happened from the article. It sounds like she just dropped the baby (or is claiming that) but they call it an “attack?” I tried Googling it but all other articles I could find about it contained the same lack of info. I’m not sure how to judge it without knowing the whole story.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 11:09 AM
159

Yeah, but society cares way more about that 10% of women than they do the entirety of men.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 04:22 PM
2

I don’t understand Burr. He says all this good shit like that and then he married a mouthy feminist who promptly quit working and had an “oopsie” baby.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 04:21 PM
1

BUT MUH BIOTRUTHS
/r/MensRights07/11/17 07:35 AM
3

Probably not smart to do for a legal case, but I don’t know if I’d be able to resist.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 09:01 PM
4

That thread is enraging. I swear, if I had a magic lamp with a genie, I would use my first wish to make every man in that thread claiming false rape accusations never happen have a false accusation happen to them. My second wish would be all the women claiming it doesn’t happen to become men and have it happen to them.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 09:00 PM
1

This is a very faulty argument. Only a percentage of men "hit on" women. It is not a part of what it is to be male or even a man. Oh come on now, bulllllshit. Men approach women far, far more than women approach men and you know it.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 07:56 AM
4

She is a dangerous psycho. There is no universe where you would be advising a woman to go parley with a dangerous man. You don’t see her as a dangerous psycho because she’s a woman and you’re blinded by benevolent sexism. Not only that, your advice is just dumbass advice. Meeting this woman just opens him up to further lies and smears. A woman psychotic enough to destroy your property and try to get you fired from your job over a broken heart from years ago is likely willing to cry rape falsely.…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 08:40 PM
16

Dude, you are so blinded to your own sexism it’s not even funny. If this were a guy vandalizing his ex-wife’s car, smearing her on the Internet and threatening her job there is absolutely zero chance in hell you would be advising her to “see it from his perspective” and to go make nice with the guy. This chick is a dangerous psycho, he should not be engaging with her in any way, shape or form and you can fuck right off with your victim-blaming bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:17 PM
109

Seriously. Imagine if the genders were reversed and a woman strung along a guy who wanted kids (note: the guy did not do that but that’s how r/relationships is taking it). Now imagine that dude vandalized the woman’s car years later, made fake Twitter accounts to smear her, threatened her job, etc., like this woman has done. They would lose their minds. They would want this guy’s head. But a woman does it? Well, that’s okay because she has a “right to be pissed.”
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:35 AM
60

I mean if that was the ooooonly thing and it wasn’t a lot, okay, maybe. But she’s vandalizing his shit, smearing him online and threatening his job. She’s a psycho. So, I’m guessing he saw other valid reasons for divorcing her.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:31 AM
41

Moral of the story: Don’t get married. Moral of the story #2: If you do get married, and she turns out to be a psycho, everyone will blame you when she goes psycho and tell you what an awful person you are for inadvertently hindering that psycho’s ability to raise a human being.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:15 AM
7

I’m hesitant to tell this story because how rabid MRAs are about this subject, but... Despite being a die hard MRA for years I was really on the fence about having my son circumcised. Logically, I agreed with all the arguments about bodily autonomy and how fucked up it was. But... I’m circumcised. I like that I’m circumcised. I remembered uncircumcised kids getting made fun of in elementary school by the other boys and I remember women in college voicing their disgust for uncircumcised penises. …
/r/MensRights08/10/17 05:05 PM
4

This comment made me rock hard. I'm gonna repost it every time some idiot says, "Hurrrr but what does this have to do with men's rights hurrrrrr."
/r/MensRights22/09/17 07:32 AM
9

When someone proves you didn't even read the thing you were talking about, it's better to just shut up and stop digging instead of trying to argue your way out of the corner. It makes you look way less stupid.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 03:17 AM
14

claims a male rape victim with a witness shouldn't be taken seriously claims to be a men's rights advocate yet has strangely never posted here before today Pick one, O Champion of Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 02:36 AM
11

Your downvotes speak to your credibility at this point.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:54 AM
14

You've replied with essentially the same comment to two of my comments so I'm just gonna copy pasta: My husband found out the day after because a friend told him he found him unconscious and saw earlier Emma on top of him on the bed but didn't realize it was him until later. That is what the husband told the wife. It was part of his story. And I'll reply with the same thing since you're too lazy to read the entire thread even after being told to. She says in her comments she spoke to the friend …
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:34 AM
18

That is what the husband told the wife. It was part of his story. Did you read the article properly or were you blinded by the furore to make a supposed mens rights issue out of an anonymous piece of hearsay on Reddit? No, you didn't read the thread properly. Again, read the thread. All of it. Including her comments: I'm positive it's true because his friend who saw it told me what happened as well and he's a very honest person who I doubt would lie It wasn't just what the husband told her. She …
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:31 AM
2

And she immediately says, "Nuh-uh, he raped me!" And his life is ruined.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:21 AM
22

And when she turns on the waterworks and says: "No he took those drugs willingly. He just doesn't remember." How seriously do you think the cops will take it then? After they stop laughing at a man reporting rape, I mean. Not to mention, he's probably legit scared of her. She's a woman who's sociopathic enough to drug-rape someone. What else do you think she's capable of? She's absolutely capable of crying rape back in retaliation. And people would believe her.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:17 AM
14

You didn't even read the full thread over there. The guy has a friend who is corroborating that he was raped.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:15 AM
20

You didn't even fully read the goddamn thread and you're over here popping off about it. One of the guy's friends corroborated the rape. It wasn't just the husband's story.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:10 AM
184

What a genuine garbage human being. The guy, like millions of other men, may not be taking his own rape seriously because he's heard all his life that men can't be raped and because there's a huge stigma about it. Male rape isn't taken seriously legally either. He didn't have the same legal recourse to go after the woman even if he felt free to. At the same time, he wants to take care of the kid who is blameless in all this, who is being held hostage by the mother. Whom he has to keep happy if h…
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:31 PM
355

I actually went to archive that thread because of how goddamn disgusting it was and saw that someone had already archived it 31 minutes ago, so I knew it'd be here. That thread was one of the most infuriating I've ever seen seen on r/relationships. The guy got raped. Not tee-hee he had one drink and couldn't consent via the feminist rules rape. Like he literally got drugged and raped. And they're tearing him down in that thread for trying to take care of his kid. Edit to add: Any suggestions on …
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:24 PM
3

Nope. Wrong. 100% fully disagree. Right now we "gain nothing" for our efforts because a large portion of the world believes that women have much harder lives than men, when the opposite is actually true. Because of that, our legitimate complaints are treated as the privileged whining. The "we all have different problems" approach only allows them to continue to dismiss us. Not to mention, it's bullshit. Men have much harder lives--it's not even close.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 02:52 AM
2

You know, when I opened the comments, I thought the top comment calling her a villain was a little harsh. Nope. Fuck this bitch. Sketchy as fuck, too. I wonder if the cops did a thorough autopsy on the guy.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 07:37 AM
41

I know that most rape claims ARE completely true I don't actually believe this. I know that makes me, like, King Shitlord of Shitlord Mountain or something, but I genuinely believe the majority of rape claims are false.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 05:39 AM
17

Nah, just the cushy jobs. They'll never give a shit about the lack of female garbagemen.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:10 PM
12

If youre a girl and you let a guy abuse, slap you, etc. i dont really feel bad for you for letting it get that far + enabling the piece of shit by staying in the whatever relationship. See how that sounds? You dumb motherfucker.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 06:07 AM
28

And our social norms say that sex between an older adult and a young teenager are not norms at all. This can become scarring for a teenager growing into adulthood. Only because of those "social norms." If society rightly stopped giving a shit about sexually mature humans fucking other sexually mature humans, it wouldn't be scarring for those minors at all. There's nothing inherently harmful about the act of sex itself, despite our sex-negative culture promoting that idea. It was completely, 100%…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 06:07 AM
21

This has never been a popular position when I've floated it here, but I literally believe consensual sex between anyone past puberty of any age should be legal. 22 and 15? I don't care. 45 and 15? Gross, but I don't care. As long as it's consensual. I just do not buy into this idea that consensual sex between a post-pubescent minor and an adult automatically harms the minor. I just don't buy that at all. Not to mention, as long as statutory rape laws exist, they will always be used unequally aga…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:24 AM
0

What if you just don't enjoy sex--like, at all--with a condom on? I would legit rather just not have sex than do it with a condom. And obviously I'm not banging any hookers without one either.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/17 11:44 AM
39

There's an infuriating thread on the front page of r/relationships right now where some dude has a physically abusive wife that assaults him in front of his child. Most of the top comments are advising him to just take the kid and leave and telling him platitudes about how it's "just a myth" that she's more likely to get custody and that it'll all work out just fine for him if he does that. Yeah.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 11:23 AM
31

I can't even participate in these threads on Reddit anymore because the "women are more suicidal than men but die way less because even at rock bottom they're so empathetic they don't want to leave a mess for others" bullshit fucking lie just sends me into a keyboard mashing rage every single time. I end up responding to bullshit replies and arguing with morons for hours. Anyone who thinks most legitimately suicidal people give a rat's fucking ass about leaving a mess behind don't know a goddamn…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 01:32 PM
2

“What we really can’t do is create a situation where we believe allegations less, take suggestions of sexual abuse less seriously, or investigate them less carefully,” he said. Equally, he sees no point in changing the law so that alleged perpetrators are granted anonymity until the point they are convicted. What the fucking fuck, man. He goes through that fucking nightmare and damn near becomes imprisoned over it and those are the retarded opinions he comes away with? Goddamn. If you can't even…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 10:51 AM
1

Good thing he never did that and you're just misrepresenting what he did to make your shitty argument then.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:34 AM
1

Ok, we gotta start with this statement. I'm sorry but it absolutely is 100% the woman's decision. It is her body, no one else's, and no woman should ever be forced to get an abortion she doesn't want nor should she be prevented from getting an abortion that she does want. Is your reading comprehension that terrible that you thought I was making that argument? My comment had literally nothing to do with what you're going on about. Good grief.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:33 AM
15

The guy found out his kid was being aborted, which he (judging by his reaction) didn't want but didn't feel comfortable protesting because society hammers it into men's heads that it's 100% the woman's decision. Then the reality of his offspring being terminated put him into a completely understandable black hole of depression. And he's immature for that? No, you're just an asshole with no empathy for his side of it.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 11:24 AM
2

GODDAMMIT I seriously knew this bathroom horseshit was going to lead to this. I am a very tall dude. I cannot piss standing up in a regular toilet without it splashing everywhere. And I refuse to sit on a disgusting public toilet for anything but a pants-shitting emergency, especially if I have to share the toilet with a bunch of women. If you've ever done janitorial work in your life, you know how disgusting women's toilets are. They piss and shit all over them.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 11:12 AM
3

Yep. Most women can't hit hard enough to leave much of a mark. OP got "lucky" that his wife is a biter. Probably wouldn't have gone this way if he had called the cops after her slapping him around a bit.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 07:40 AM
5

Oh man I guarantee I used to hate him more. My kid used to listen to his obnoxious gameplay videos where he would just be constantly screaming nonsense. I could not stand even ten seconds of it. Jacksepticeye was another that drove me crazy. Something about the screaming. I can't take that shit. We went through lots of headphones in those days. But I really like him now. I'm not subscribed and I only come across his videos when something comes up on Reddit or whatever, but he earned a lot of res…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 11:06 AM
3

It's fucking pathetic that anyone upvoted your disgusting, ignorant comment. This guy has experienced a lifetime of racism and being shamed and told he's not masculine and your dumb ass boils that down to him not reacting well to one singular comment. Just fuck right off.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:52 AM
16

I mean... I'm against forced circumcision like pretty much everyone else here, but am I seriously supposed to believe 1 in 5 circumcised dudes can't urinate properly? That is obviously a horseshit inflated/misleading/whatever statistic.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 06:20 AM
1

I wish I knew her name and I wish I had a Death Note.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 05:43 AM
5

I mean, I'm okay with that being a crime. I don't want someone throwing their nasty backwashed glass of water all over me.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:19 AM
1

I guess I can buy that. I'd like to see what the numbers are for whites, though. I doubt there's much difference across the states, maybe 10% difference.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 09:17 AM
24

Sadly, both men and women are biologically hardwired to give more of a shit about women. Eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap. But it really shows you just how powerful that emotionally-driven delusion is when there are threads like that and so many people still can't see how men are legitimately second class citizens.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 04:11 AM
2

I can't understand why it would be that much lower... Is it the Mexican populations there or something?
/r/MensRights18/03/17 04:08 AM
7

Hmmm... Maybe I'm just naive, but I'm pretty skeptical of those west coast numbers being accurate.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 04:16 AM
35

You got the conclusion backwards, dude. They found that liberals liked Trump's words when it came from a woman and recognized Hillary's unlikeability as a man.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:29 PM
20

This is a great graph but someone badly needs to change all the green in that image to pink. We instinctively associate pink with female and it would make it so much easier to understand the graph at a glance.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 12:36 PM
11

Pretty much all this. Lesbians have no trouble making each other orgasm because they use their tongues and know women orgasm from clitoral stimulation. Guys, in general, have no fucking clue that the majority of women can't orgasm from penetration alone and need their clit monkeyed with. And women won't tell them.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 12:04 PM
2

I accept the fuck out of trans people. I just don't accept the idea that mutilating your genitals and taking some hormones means you can change your sex. We don't currently have the technology to change sex.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:07 AM
3

Just another day that I wish I had a Death Note.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 08:04 AM
3

TIL I am a serial domestic abuser.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 11:08 AM
1

No. Men have more and worse problems. Maybe someday you'll overcome your inclination toward white knightery and see that.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 05:28 AM
1

This is the single most pathetic comment I've ever seen upvoted on this subreddit. This woman helped torture and murder and man and isn't even repentant about it and you're making excuses for her. What the fuck is happening to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 12:36 PM
9

I can't believe your comment got fucking downvoted. What the fuck is going on in here? Are even MRAs not able to control their impulse to white knight for women? He is right. Marching on behalf of the privileged is a joke and women are by far the privileged gender in our society.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 10:47 AM
7

Men are the majority of suicides, workplace deaths, the homeless, drug addicts, and victims of violent crime and murder. We die younger. Less of us graduate college. We receive harsher prison sentences for the same crimes as women. And then you have these women doing their little march as if they are oppressed when they're the ones with all the privilege. So why the fuck shouldn't we belittle it? The whole world ought to belittle it. This feminist march should be treated the same way a white vic…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 10:44 AM
35

They have more rights than men do and better lives in general by any objective measure. This protest is a joke. It would be like rich people protesting they don't get paid enough.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 09:01 AM
5

The thing that still gets me is why normal people refuse to call them out for what they are. A hate group. Because gynocentrism is biological and will take a massive social upheaval to condition away.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 11:13 AM
11

It's interesting to see how social conditioning can result even in a Men's Rights poster saying "female impregnated by male". Gynocentrism is probably biological, unfortunately, so it'll always slip in there, even with people like us who strive to be aware of it.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 12:34 PM
7

Or, you know, maybe because the overwhelming majority of feminists and anti-male SJWs are left wingers.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 05:27 AM
1

Again, you may have a shittier than average sense of smell. Unless we're talking about some gigantic mansion, any house with a litter box is going to smell like cat piss. Period. Just because you can't smell it doesn't mean other people can't.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 05:24 AM
4

No, it was meant as a comedy It was a shitty comedy and feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 05:22 AM
2

What if I think anybody past puberty should be able to legally consent to sex? Because I totally fucking do.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 10:52 AM
1

That's because you're desensitized to it.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 10:49 AM
1

Then you have a shitty sense of smell. Other will people will smell it. You're not violating the laws of physics, dude. A box of cat piss in your house? Those cat piss molecules are in the air in your home. Or their home. Or whoever's.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 10:49 AM
0

If you have an indoor cat, your home reeks of cat piss. No, it doesn't matter how religiously you change the litter box. Cat piss is strong and the odor gets into everything. If you think your home is the exception, you're wrong. You're just desensitized to it from living there. I say this as someone who likes cats and has three, but they live the fuck outside where cats belong.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 12:13 PM
6

This absolutely is a men's rights issue. Yes, there is nothing wrong with this ad. Nothing. The problem is the reverse of things like this ad are used by feminists to generate outrage and as a cudgel against men. And the only way that's going to stop is by pointing out the hypocrisy. Which is kind of hard to do with fellow MRAs going "hurr durr this isn't a men's rights issue go back to r/feminism."
/r/MensRights06/01/17 12:13 PM
4

I can't believe the people over there saying shit like two wrongs don't make a right, "just because someone hits you doesn't make it right to hit them back," etc. Uh, maybe not always legally, but you are absolutely morally justified to physically retaliate against someone assaulting you. There is not one iota of wrong in doing that.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 12:13 PM
2

It's not nonsense at all. He's right. Women do tend to be less logical about things than men.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 07:05 AM
11

I mean, if the rats are breeding exponentially and there's no way to kill them, then yeah, I probably would.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 01:50 PM
23

Everyone who's not feminist emigrating and starting over at a Moon colony? Feminism has too much power in this country for this to ever change. Some MRAs will say that's not true, but I think it is. It's only going to get worse.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:06 AM
3

I don't want to give up urinals...
/r/MensRights13/12/16 10:46 AM
1

Who says technology won't have made it possible for you to have children without a woman by then?
/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:48 AM
10

Seriously. Just imagine if there were something like Star Trek-style holodecks. Would any guy actually deal with a flesh and blood woman ever again? I'll admit it. I wouldn't.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 06:19 AM
10

This. I'm old and being openly homosexual wasn't acceptable when I was in high school. Nevertheless, we had a boy and girl at my school who were more-or-less out. Or as out as you could be back then. The girl used to get teased and ridiculed for dressing like a boy and having a "dykey" haircut. The boy got the teasing and ridicule, too (for his feminine mannerisms and voice), but he also got regularly physically assaulted and got the shit beat out of him at least a couple times I remember. There…
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:41 AM
17

I have been skeptical about this crap from the start. People don't remember, but Jolie is nuts. When her and Billy Bob Thornton were dating they used to wear vials of each other's blood around their necks in public. There was that creepy borderline-incest stuff with her brother. Her father has talked about her having problems. Not to mention, she willingly screwed around with Brad while he was still dating Jennifer Aniston which says a lot for her character. She's massaged her public image to th…
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:37 AM
24

You want to hear my crackpot theory for why he ended up with so much female support? (Brace yourself. This may be too politically incorrect for even here.) Because women like sexually aggressive men no matter how much they protest otherwise. At least rich and powerful ones anyway. Hear me out. Remember Bill Clinton? He got even more popular after the whole Lewinsky and Paula Jones debacle. Hell, people still talk about that whole deal like it's just some endearing Bill Clinton mishap. I remember…
/r/MensRights15/11/16 05:26 AM
14

And she was able to use her gender to constantly cry misogyny and con women who might not otherwise have voted for her into feeling like they had to support Team Women. Can't prove it either but I'd bet money she paid at least some of those groping accusers for the same reason. I mean, it's on video that her campaign paid people to cause violence at Trump rallies (which got blamed on Bernie) so she's definitely capable of it.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 11:48 AM
14

I mean, it's pretty hard for poor rural people to give a shit about identity politics when they've been watching their jobs disappear overseas for decades and just found out the insurance they already can't afford is fixing to double in price. If "misogynist comments" is the most important presidential issue for you, then you probably have a pretty privileged life.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 11:41 AM
0

Yes, Trump is not even close to the perfect MRA president. There will probably never be a perfect MRA president. But he is miles better for MRAs than the feminist Hillary Clinton.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 11:54 AM
6

If you think those two single issues mean Hillary would be better for men overall than Trump then you are straight up delusional. Trump may not be the MRA dream candidate, but comparing Trump to Hillary is like comparing the flu to Ebola as far as men's rights go.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 05:45 PM
8

The doors are the same fucking size, dude. It's the perspective making it look that way. Look at the lag bolts at the top of each door for proof. There's the same proportions in the spacing between the bolts and on either side of them. It's the exact same goddamn door.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 11:22 AM
2

This is a great fucking post. The only thing I take issue with is this: Some MGTOW's have advanced some rather fanciful ideas about sexbots, Virtual reality, artificial wombs etc., but almost all hetero men yearn for female companionship, and it goes beyond sex. I don't think this is actually fanciful at all. I mean--hey--I'll admit it. If Star Trek-style holodecks were invented tomorrow and I had one in my home, I would never date a flesh and blood woman again. Someday--maybe not in our lifetim…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 05:52 PM
-4

The reason that these allegations are being made is because at the last debate trump made the statement that everything was "all talk" Hillary is paying them. Fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 10:15 AM
1

Because you're defending a sick fuck. If a feminist did what Woody Allen has done you would excoriate them. But he's a man, so you defend him. You are blind to your own goddamn hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 04:14 PM
0

They were together 12 years. They had one bio child and two adopted ones. That's as wife as wife gets. You're just being a fucking pedant because your argument sucks and you're defending a sicko.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 04:12 PM
7

A lot of MRAs won't like my answer, but I firmly believe it's genetic. Yes, society reinforces it and makes it even worse, but that is pure caveman genetics shit. Egg value vs. sperm value, etc.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 04:12 PM
0

You're defending a guy who had an affair with his wife's daughter, a daughter he had known since she was around 9 fucking years old. Again, what the fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights09/10/16 06:55 PM
0

Why are you defending a guy who fucked his wife's kid and his children's sister? Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you? It drives me insane that some of you assholes defend this piece of shit. Millions of guys out there in dire straights, and you want to defend this sick old fuck. Yeah, that's reaaaaaally gonna help men's rights, defending the guy who fucked his wife's daughter. What is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights09/10/16 06:13 PM
0

You sure are trying awfully hard to defend someone who fucked his children's sister and his wife's daughter. If you can't see how fucking creepy that is, you're beyond help. And "feminist?" Peruse my comment history, you fucking moron. I'm about as far from feminist as it gets. I would just rather MRAs not defend creepy old fucks like Woody Allen. Doesn't exactly help our cause and there are plenty of men who actually deserve and need it.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 06:10 PM
5

Hillary Clinton tried to silence and intimidate her husband's rape victim. Trump made a dirty joke about grabbing a woman's pussy. Which one is the media talking about? Gee, I wonder why.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 06:07 PM
-77

The guy groomed and fucked his girlfriend's daughter and his children's sister. I don't know whether he molested the other kid, but even without that he's a sick old fuck and I wish r/mensrights would stop trying to hitch our wagon to that creepy old asshole's star.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 06:35 PM
0

Would you give up a high paying job which isn't "exciting" to women for shit pay? Shit, personal trainers get ass from their rep in the gym scene but I sure as fuck will not be give up all of this cash to be a PT. I literally said you shouldn't do that. Did you even read what I wrote or did you skim the first few lines and knee-jerk? All I'm doing is refuting OP's well-meaning feel-good but ultimately wrong notion that having a "nerdy" job isn't a handicap with women. It is. It shouldn't be, but…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 03:57 PM
1

The chicks fucking cops because they're cops would fuck dudes because they have a cool tribal tat. AWALT. But if it helps you sleep at night to think that, go right ahead. Your high paying "beta" job will never be what holds you back with chicks, it will be your body or attitude. Did anybody say anything about holding someone back? Definitely not me. (Read closer.) You can be 5'0" and get laid regular, if you improve other areas. But no matter what a pussy-slaying 5'0" guy you are, you would alw…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 03:55 PM
2

You would say I am double handicapped... I would say you are a fool and I invite bitches to pound town a few times a week. I believe you. I also believe you would get even more ass and/or better-looking ass more easily if you were 6'3" with a job that gives women the tingles. You think you're proving me wrong, but you need to work on your reading comprehension because what you said is exactly what I said is the case. You can get laid--often--even with a handicap, especially if you have other goo…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 03:50 PM
-2

Acting proud and excited about your work will give her a better opinion of it than if you stammer 'I-i work in it' while looking @ the floor. Sure, it'll give her a better opinion, but it ain't going to give her tingles and in cases like IT (where there's a negative stereotype among women about IT guys) telling her your job will in fact do the opposite initially. If you have to explain away her being turned off, it's a handicap, dude. It's not a big one or an insurmountable one, but it is. Also,…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 01:39 PM
5

And if he were 6'2", he would get even more and better looking women. A handicap is handicap is a handicap, no matter what your other advantages.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 01:19 PM
-4

You're just wrong, dude. Yes, if you have a high-paying IT job and you make it far enough along with a woman to disclose your income somehow, sure, she's going to be down for those bucks. But excitement? No. Women don't get tingles from a guy saying they work in IT the way they do when a guy says, "I'm a police officer" or "I'm a lawyer" or "I'm a doctor" or some other status-y job. They just don't. In fact, it kind of does the opposite a bit. So, yeah, we can dither over whether being short or …
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 01:18 PM
10

Seriously. This thread reminds me of the occasional threads we see here where some short guy gives a pep talk to the other short TRP'ers about how being short isn't actually a handicap and it's all in their heads. Well, it isn't in their heads. Being short's a handicap. And having an unglamorous job like IT is a handicap (although for God's sake don't give up a good-paying IT job for pussy). And neither of those handicaps mean you can't get laid--it just means you're never going to do it as easi…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 11:19 AM
6

Can we stop with the Trump worship? I'm a men's rights activist who is also liberal and despises Trump. Hey man, if you want to bury your head in the sand about which candidate will be drastically worse for you as a male, nobody's gonna stop you.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 10:32 AM
9

How the fuck did they twist Weiner's problem so that it's about Internet porn? Let me tell you what Anthony Weiner's problem is, because it's obvious as day to me. Anthony Weiner is a tiny, shrimpy, not particularly good-looking man who probably got almost zero attention from women for the majority of his life (until he became powerful) and developed severe self-esteem issues over it. Once he got some status and started getting attention, he went completely overboard with it and now he can't sto…
/r/MensRights03/09/16 01:17 PM
3

Yeah and maybe Taylor Swift will call me up tomorrow and offer me a blowjob.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 10:08 AM
7

Then they just move the goal posts and claim no one knows for sure Mattress Girl was lying. blood pressure intensifies
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:32 PM
1

No, dude, there are honestly a lot of users here who think differing social behavior between men and women (women crying more, etc.) is just learned behavior and not biological. But I recognize people do what you're saying as well.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 05:39 AM
1770

Am I misremembering with someone else or didn't Amy Schumer basically rape a passed out dude and then act like she was the victim?
/r/MensRights18/08/16 05:36 AM
-4

Really great comment and really refreshing to see here because I find that a lot of times r/mensrights is just as bad as the feminists at denying biology and claiming there's no sexual dimorphism in human behavior.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 05:39 PM
3

I mean, speaking for me, I never had a problem with women-only anything. It's that they won't also let us have men-only things anymore that bothers me.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 01:20 PM
3

Even here, anything that can even possibly be misconstrued as men being better than women at something (even something as innocuous as higher sex drive) will have people argue against it. There's a certain mindset that desperately wants to believe men and women are exactly the same except for the plumbing. Well, they're wrong. Men have higher sex drive. Period. It's also the reason for that famous Okcupid example where men found 50% of women to be above average in looks, while women only ranked …
/r/MensRights19/07/16 07:38 AM
2

Idk....the sites down now but my life experience doesn't support this at all. Women are just as sexual as men, if not more, but is expressed differently. This is just straight up wrong. I'm sorry. Testosterone is heavily responsible for sex drive and men simply have more of it than women. It's the same reason that when FtM transgenders are given testosterone, they suddenly become as horny as teenage boys.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 07:28 AM
3

It is extremely anti-male. I'm a big-time lurker/semi-time poster over there. That place is a shithole full of bitter women who hate men and white knights. I could write pages about the biased shit I've seen. If you're a woman with a problem, you will be given sympathy, understanding and everyone will take your side unless you are egregiously wrong. If you're a man with a problem, at best the posters will be harsh and will furiously search for the "other side" of your story to see how they can s…
/r/MensRights15/06/16 05:23 AM
1

Since there's nothing to be gained financially by suing her (and it'd only hurt the parents) is there any way you could just get a plain old restraining order against this girl? I really strongly disagree with the benevolently sexist commenters going a bloo bloo she's just a little girl kids make mistakes bloo bloo. She's 16. She's old enough to know better than this and this is budding sociopath behavior. You need to keep your kid well away from this crazy. A restraining order would be a great …
/r/MensRights20/05/16 06:20 AM
14

You think a school bureaucrat is going to be fair to a sixteen-year-old male accused of stalking and sexual harassment. That principal can fuck this kid's life and reputation with the stroke of a pen and the only thing he cares about is covering the school's ass. You are wrong, dude. Wrong.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 03:08 PM
30

Dude, delay the meeting until you can get one. It's that important. Just tell the principal you have to delay the meeting a few days to meet your lawyer's availability.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 03:00 PM
7

URGE TO KILL... RISING... That was way too on the nose.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 04:26 AM
35

Not only that but it's shortsighted and stupid. So Junkie Girl gets free needles and Junkie Guy doesn't. Junkie Guy ends up with Hep C or HIV. Junkie Girl and Junkie Guy end up together as a couple, he gives her the ol' "Hey baby I'm clean" and they start sharing her needles because that's what dumbass junkie couples do and she contracts his Hep C and HIV. All of which might have been prevented if they'd just given the men needles too.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 10:18 AM
3

Give me a fuckin' break. First of all, she lied and said he almost yanked her to the ground, which you can clearly see is horseshit from the video. She was told by Secret Service twice to stop touching Trump, kept doing it, and then got pulled back by the upper arm--which, mysteriously, isn't where her supposed bruises are. And as for Lewandowski lying, maybe he honestly didn't remember the non-event of brushing past a reporter which I'm sure he does dozens of times a day. Not to mention, you co…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:39 AM
2

Man, sometimes I am so thankful that I am an old fucker and this stuff wasn't around when I was in college. Once, when I lived in the dorm, which was coed, a girl I'd broken up with came unhinged when she found out I was dating another girl in the building. She falsely accused me of physical abuse (and I almost got booted out before she recanted) and anonymous fliers showed up around the building slandering me and the girl I was seeing. It was a nightmare. But it would've been sooooo much worse …
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:16 AM
2

No, I wouldn't say that at all. I just don't expect it to change anything.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:43 AM
11

Want me to be honest? The men's rights movement is a lost cause. It's not going to get bigger and gain traction like I see people claim in this subreddit on a near-daily basis. The tide is not turning. Oh, there may be a little ebb and flow where things cycle up and down a little bit. But over the long term? Decades? A century? Society is only going to get more gynocentric. It's biological. Nobody wants to admit this. Women care mainly for women. Men care mainly for women. Once upon a time, soci…
/r/MensRights20/01/16 07:13 AM
7

Second, are you actually buying in to the whole drunk sex isn't consensual bullshit? Of course not. But the only way these insane SJWs and feminists will get that through their heads is by labeling the same actions from them as rape. People (women especially) don't give a shit about men. You can't logic them into giving a shit about men or logic them into realizing a woman being drunk isn't necessarily rape. They only give a shit when it affects them. Kind of like how feminists suddenly start gi…
/r/MensRights20/01/16 06:58 AM
6

OP, you did as well as you could under the circumstances, but you cannot babysit these children ever again. I repeat: YOU CANNOT BABYSIT THESE KIDS EVER AGAIN. This woman was willing to throw a child molestation accusation at someone she didn't even know. And now you're on her bad side. It doesn't matter that their parents support you. This woman could fuck your life seven ways to Sunday with more accusations. How many people will believe her if she goes around telling them you're molesting her …
/r/MensRights21/12/15 01:54 AM
10

This is so naive and assumes that law enforcement would treat him fairly, which MRAs know is sadly not the case when it comes to he-said-she-said. Much less with a he-said-she-said involving a teenage male, who are unfairly considered by many to be degeneracy incarnate. This woman was willing to falsely accuse someone she didn't even know of child molestation. And some of you guys are seriously suggesting that a 16-year-old male should've puffed up his chest and refused through force to let the …
/r/MensRights21/12/15 01:48 AM
6

And then you'll go to jail when she turns on the waterworks and spins them a tall tale about how you assaulted her and shows them her bruises. You seem to be operating under the mistaken assumption that law enforcement takes the word of men and women equally. Might want to rethink that.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 01:38 AM
2

This kid should not have left without speaking to the parents. And the cops wouldn't do anything to him without also talking to the parents -- they know that not all family is trusted. You're getting all fucking wound up and projecting about a hypothetical that doesn't even apply to this situation, since the children's father was obviously fine with him leaving the kids with her as evidenced by the lack of ass-chewing he gave the OP. Or did you miss the part where the aunt was on the phone with …
/r/MensRights21/12/15 01:29 AM
4

The only reason I never banged a hooker is because I can't orgasm with a condom. Never could. Not even when I was 16 and a couple quick jerks could get me off. No death grip here either. I don't know how anybody gets off in those. Can't feel anything.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 12:11 PM
3

I'm inclined to believe no one until evidence either way has come about. The fact that they decided to go to Twitter instead of the cops is evidence, dude.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 05:01 AM
3

There was another thread a couple days ago there that was similar. A guy and his wife came home from a trip early and walked in on their 18-year-old daughter having a MMF threesome in their den. The wife wanted to punish the daughter, but the sniveling beta husband was opposed to it. The wife steamed and sulked about it, so the husband came crying to the bitter women and white knights in that subreddit that I cannot name for fear of the overzealous Automod here. The posters there, predictably, p…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/15 12:35 PM
21

This so hard. The "lift for yourself" shit annoys me to no end. I lift because I want to look attractive to the opposite goddamn sex and not be embarrassed to take my shirt off around them at the beach. These types of guys you're describing are also the ones who reject the TRP's definition of "alpha" and insert their own. For the purposes of TRP (and this is straight from redpillschool's mouth) an alpha trait is any trait that is sexually desirable to women. But for those dipshits you're describ…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/15 08:34 AM
1

I've put my dick in plenty of crazy over the years. But crazy with legal superpowers and hotline access to ruin my life via the justice system? I know some people are giving you shit, but I wouldn't have done it either. Sometimes you gotta listen to your gut, not your dick.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/15 07:08 AM
7

Man, those fake roofie stories really chap my ass. I've known a zillion women with them. The truth is, women can't hold their fucking liquor and have zero concept of when they've drank enough to black out.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/15 06:53 AM
2

Women trade sex for love. Men trade love for sex. You fucked up the formula and gave the love away for free.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/15 06:47 AM
3

Maybe not 94% but I genuinely believe (although I can't prove it) that there are far more false rape claims than actual rapes--at least in the U.S.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 06:36 AM
1

You can distinctly tell when a woman is writing This is so fucking true. And man do women get offended when you point it out.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 05:24 AM
1

I used to lurk the printSF subreddit quite a bit, but it's become a shithole lately of trying to insert women into everything. Like, someone will post a top ten list of a particular kind of a scifi and immediately out will come the screams of "How come there's no women on this list!" Because women write shit scifi, generally speaking.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 05:23 AM
23

Sooo true. You should see the way that a certain relationships subreddit on this site (that I can't name because of automoderator overzealousness) goes bonkers whenever some unsuspecting 20-year-old girl wanders in there asking for relationship advice about her older boyfriend. They all dogpile each other trying to school her about how she's being taken advantage of.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 05:08 AM
13

Dude. Please do it and please come back and post an update thread when you do. It will be awesome.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/15 06:00 AM
6

Can someone tell my old out-of-touch ass what "fuckboy" means? Googling on my phone is a pain and wasn't much help.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 10:48 PM
2

Oh, we take them extremely seriously. No, this is simply not true. Some may care--you may care--but I've been in this subreddit since it opened and there are lots and lots and lots of posters in this subreddit who don't give the slightest of fucks about those issues.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 02:32 PM
3

This. The problem with the men's right subreddit is they don't accept that men and women are fundamentally different (other than the plumbing) so their approach to issues goes nowhere. The problem with the red pill subreddit, conversely, is that although people do accept these differences here they don't take the eroding rights of men seriously enough or consider its potential impact on them, usually with a dismissive "Don't concern yourself with such things, bro, go lift."
/r/TheRedPill20/10/15 11:13 AM
0

Women, in general, are terrible disciplinarians with children. Partly because women tend to be too wishy-washy to enforce discipline with their children and partly because kids (especially boys) are often simply not as afraid of women by nature as they are men and so don't mind their mothers as well. The end result is a bunch of out of control children, especially boys, who end up getting medicated into submission and told their behavior is mental illness instead of the natural end result of no …
/r/MensRights13/10/15 10:18 AM
3

While some within the counter-feminist movement counsel patience and argue that the social pendulum is beginning to swing back towards sanity, I do not believe this is accurate. 1000% this. Every time I see an MRA on here talk about how the tide is turning I just shake my head and wonder what fantasy world they're living in.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 09:49 AM
2

Yeah, the rest of Reddit is really pissing me off with the whole "OMG don't say his name!" thing and how badly they don't seem to get it. These guys aren't walking into schools and blowing people away because they want to be post-mortem reality TV stars. They're not doing it to be famous. They're doing it because they've had miserably unhappy lives (for a variety of reasons) that has made them hate other people so much that they're filled with rage and hatred and want revenge. They're looking to…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 02:10 AM
3

but she did mention a few times how she's bothered because people in her community think that any woman who smokes is automatically a whore. You should tell her there's a reason the phrase "If she smokes, she pokes" came into existence. Women who smoke are more promiscuous than women who don't, generally speaking.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 05:47 AM
1

If I'm white knighting, you're unnecessarily vilifying. You're definitely white knighting, and I'm definitely not unnecessarily vilifying anyone. Throwing a temper tantrum and ignoring your cancer-stricken boyfriend because he doesn't want you to shave his head in solidarity is egregious, disgusting behavior. The fact that you can't see that is telling.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 03:47 AM
1

r/relationships is a default subreddit, the biggest relationship advice on the subreddit, and has a clear history of anti-male bias and outright make hatred. If you can't see why that might just be relevant to men's rights, you're clueless. Calling out anti-male bias is absolutely a men's rights issue. And I didn't "dig up" anything. That comment section is littered with highly-upvoted comments defending the woman's behavior and admonishing the man. And if you'd bothered to actually look, you'd …
/r/MensRights01/10/15 03:45 AM
6

Dude, you're doing the same thing they are over there and white knighting for her. You don't throw a baby fit and ignore your cancer-stricken boyfriend because he asked you not to shave your head. Period. Underline it. No decent, non-immature, non-selfish person would do that. Would you throw a temper tantrum and ignore your cancer-stricken girlfriend if she asked you not to shave your head? Of course you wouldn't. So why in the fuck are you defending this chick doing that very thing? Women are …
/r/MensRights30/09/15 04:32 PM
3

I'm at the point where I purchase media that feminists make a stink about (as long as the producers don't give in to those feminists' demands) just because I want to support content producers with a spine. Oh? Your game has a big-breasted female character that feminists are losing their mind about? You say you're not changing it? Congratulations, you get my money.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 04:09 AM
13

This is, again, why we really need a men's only relationship subreddit on Reddit, because r/relationships is hugely biased and hostile toward men.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 11:28 PM
10

Grrrrr. I fucking hate r/relationships so much. It's one of the most transparently anti-male subreddits on the site (won't stop them from denying it to anyone who points that out, though). Somebody from here seriously needs to start a competing relationship advice subreddit that is fair to men. I mean, just look at the comment graveyard in that thread where the Nazi r/relationships mods have removed tons of comments defending the guy and eventually deleted the thread itself. They pull this shit …
/r/MensRights25/09/15 05:53 AM
23

She egged it on big time. She also made her own false rape accusation against a former schoolmate. Oh, and she molested her little sister for years. But, it's okay because she's a woman and a feminist.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 05:42 AM
6

So, a child-molesting, false rape-accusing feminist still gets a glowing interview with a presidential front-runner. Yeah, to the people who say that the MRA movement is making headway against radical feminism I say: Ha.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 05:39 AM
6

Man that whole thing rustles my jimmies. Make fun of Trump's weird hair and/or appearance? A-OK. Make fun of Fiorina's grotesque plastic surgery face? MUH-SOJENY.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 08:07 AM
6

The sexbot thing is never going to happen and here's why: VR technology. A sexbot... To actually have the hardware that can mimic a woman physically in every way... The complicated machinery, etc. That's something that's always going to be prohibitively expensive for your average consumer. Unless we're talking a couple hundred years in the future or something, because who the fuck knows what things will be like then. But in the near future? It's not going to happen. It will simply be a toy for t…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 05:52 AM
14

Robots that can accurately simulate sex with real woman are probably always going to be prohibitively expensive, IMHO. However, computer simulation that can connect directly to your senses probably won't be. Imagine some sort of virtual reality helmet where you can have sex with any woman of your choosing and actually feel it. Shit is going to hit the fan when that technology comes around. Who's going to date a real woman when you can go home and fuck the latest supermodel? Assuming it doesn't g…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:06 AM
22

Sellers said the remarks were so excessive that cast members “became physically ill and vomited after the show because they were so vulgar.” I have always found it maddening how feminists will go on and on about how strong and equal to men women are... And then two seconds later have an actual no-shit, honest-to-God, hysterical, fainting, straight-out-of-the-19th-century attack of the fucking vapors if someone offends them.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 02:51 PM
0

The point is, not being violent dark triad style doesn't make you NOT alpha. Yeah, duh, and I never claimed that so you're apparently making a "point" for no reason, dufus.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/15 04:57 AM
7

Erm... I don't know that I'm ready to salute them, considering they convicted him of a felony that he's probably going to do prison time over and he'll have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life. But uh, sure, I salute them for not convicting him of the rape charges I guess.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 06:13 PM
0

Holy shit, dude. If women in general are attracted to a trait, it's an alpha trait. Women, in general, are attracted to violent, aggressive men. Therefore--A+B=C--violence is an alpha trait. Yes, it really is that fucking simple and ten paragraphs of bloviating about your philosophy about life doesn't make it one iota less true.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/15 05:49 PM
0

Yeah, you're wrong. To paraphrase redpillschool: for the purposes of redpill, alpha traits are the ones found sexually desirable by women. And women like violent men. See: Dark Triad guys, MMA fighters, jocks, even serial killers. Alpha traits are not the ones we happen to find admirable or personally desirable the way you're describing. They just aren't.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 01:09 PM
0

Now someone do a post about bluepillers and cats. That's been bugging me for years.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 11:25 AM
-2

Aaaaaaaaand this is why I laugh when I see misguided r/theredpill posters claiming that being a violent asshole "isn't alpha."
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 05:32 AM
3

Yeah, I like to watch those Dateline NBC murder mysteries and I always wonder how many of those evil husbands who killed their innocent wives were actually about to have their lives completely and unjustifiably ruined in divorce court. Not saying getting screwed in divorce court is a justification for murder, but there probably would be a few less Dateline NBC murder mysteries if guys weren't routinely subject to that.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 05:23 AM
1

The only place an overwhelmingly majority of feminists grew up doing hard work, much less mowing the lawn, was your imagination. Feminists are mainly spoiled, upper-middle class white women. Your assertion is laughable.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 03:08 PM
1

Explain, then, the stupidly obvious difference in her behavior in the second video toward the actually attractive guy. The blushing, the giggling, the intense eye contact, the lip-biting, etc. It's a complete night and day difference from the first video. Without it, I probably just would've assumed you were right, because, unlike you and your self-proclaimed mastery of human behavior, I am not flawless at reading body language. The difference in behavior between those two videos, however, is so…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 03:04 PM
1

Yes and I probably would've agreed with your detailed analysis simply for being detailed--if I hadn't seen the video the other user posted. That video shows quite clearly, despite the detail in your analysis, that you aren't correct and read into things that weren't there because there is a stupidly obvious difference in how she acts with an attractive guy questioning her. I mean, if it makes you feel better to assume I'm an OP who had his mind already made up, go right ahead but you're wrong ab…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 02:59 PM
1

Thanks for posting this. This video ought end any debate, because there is a complete night and day difference in how she acts in this video compared to the one I posted with Pete Holmes. I mean, it's not even close. This is what she looks like when she actually is attracted to a guy and finds him appealing.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 10:46 AM
1

You're wrong, dude. Watch the video another user posted of Ronda Rousey talking to someone she actually does find attractive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRhK9bM4XgU She's giggling and covering her face, constantly biting her lip, she's engaged and she even blushes once or twice. It's a complete night and day difference to the way she acted in the other video. She was repulsed by Pete Holmes but found him funny. Her body language was clear and completely different to the video I just posted.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 10:44 AM
4

I appreciate the breakdown, but I still think you're completely wrong. Watch this video that another user posted of Rousey talking to an actual attractive male: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRhK9bM4XgU She's engaged, she's constantly biting her lip, she's giggling and covering her face, he even makes her blush. Her demeanor is just completely different than the other video. This is what she looks like with someone she actually finds appealing. She had no chemistry with Pete Holmes. He was jus…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 10:42 AM
1

It is just wrong to try and generalize two followers to the movement as a whole. Yeah, even if it's accurate? Because it totally fucking is. Unless you're seriously going to sit here and try to tell us all how most feminists grew up mowing their yards and didn't get purposefully excluded from that and other manual labor just for being women? Yeah, go ahead and tell us that. OP wasn't being a feminist. He had an excellent point, which you completely missed.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 08:22 AM
1

Yeah, I raped the shit out of Batman this weekend.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 08:09 AM
1

The amount of upvotes and the comments on that r/videos thread honestly had me questioning my judgement a little, so comments like yours are relieving to me. It's still horrifying to me, though, to see from that thread the sheer amazing amount of bluepillers who can't even read basic social cues from a woman like Rousey in that video. Like, I'm no fucking ladies man or something, but it seems pretty obvious to me that she's kinda repulsed by the guy and there is zero chemistry. But apparently "s…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 05:27 AM
1

There's a highly rated cable news host named Megyn Kelly who has been speaking out for our causes lately, but every time she does r/mensrights just shits all over her and screams, "Ewwwww, conservative! Icky!" Because, you know, they're waiting for that mythical ultra-progressive yet-somehow-anti-feminist media personality to pop up and defend us all I guess.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:48 AM
7

You have got to be shitting me.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 06:28 PM
6

For fuck's sake, every fucking thread... News flash, fellas: This woman is the only major news anchor who sides with us. And what do you guys do? Appreciate that we finally have a media ally? Say "Thank God, finally some positive publicity for us!" Maybe just give her a digital thumbs up? No, of course not, you crybabies scream "Ewwww conservative!" and bitch and moan about how much you hate Megyn Kelly and Fox fucking News. That's real constructive. I don't like the Republican Party either, but…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 11:27 AM
11

OP, please for the love of God do not listen to that hopelessly naive comment (and the others below) about running to HR. HR is not your friend. They are not some fair and impartial abriter of justice. They are not some kindly old uncle looking out for your best interests. They are the same flawed, biased employees that work in the rest of the company, with their own personal loyalties and biases and their job is to protect the company first and foremost--not you. Reddit is young and most of the…
/r/MensRights02/07/15 04:29 AM
32

Think that's the only time I ever agreed with Olbermann on anything. Good on him.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 05:59 AM
3

I disagree. Yeah, and you're as wrong as wrong can be. Women absolutely receive more compassion than men.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 05:49 AM
7

I actually do believe there's a biological/genetic component to the whole thing. But that isn't a very popular opinion around here. r/mensrights tends to be as bad as r/feminism about denying sexual dimorphism sometimes.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 05:38 AM
3

As far as negative institutional sexism goes, I can't think of a single one. White Western women are honestly the most pampered and privileged creatures to ever walk the planet. If, however, special privileges and benevolent sexism count, I could probably rattle you off a laundry list, but neither of those things count as sexism according to feminists.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 04:43 AM
13

I'm with you. Feminists will burn the country to the ground before they cede an iota of reproductive decision-making to men. This shit will never be legal on American shores. They will find a way to stop it.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 06:40 PM
1

Hire a man. That's my advice.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/15 01:53 AM
13

That wasn't Adria Richards, that was... Actually, you know what, nevermind, this comment thread is funnier this way.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 05:54 PM
3

It may have gotten brigaded after the fact--I'm really not sure. But downvoted or not, it's still telling that most of the feminist responses are defending Schumer and claiming it somehow isn't rape by their usual standard. I mean, the thread was on the front page of r/askfeminists for quite some time. You'd think some of these "True Feminists" we always hear about would've chimed in to decry Schumer in all that time. But nope. Not so much.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 02:50 PM
11

You're making up a completely fictional explanation with no basis in reality to try and absolve Amy Schumer of blame for gloating about raping a guy. Yeah... That's pretty clear cut white knightery. Sorry.
/r/PussyPass29/05/15 02:46 PM
8

I really doubt it. It was part of a whole thing about her confidence and body issues to a women's group. She's just another hypocrite who doesn't think anything of telling a story like that publicly.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 08:18 AM
43

I mean, it's not like I don't know what feminists are capable of after all this time, but, still, when you see something like this... It's just shocking like... There's seriously no bottom. I mean, there's seriously no limit to the depth of the bullshit they're capable of convincing themselves of to maintain their worldview.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 07:33 AM
1

Yeah, you might call it that. Most of Reddit would gleefully call you a rapist who took advantage of someone who was unable to consent. It's happened plenty of times.
/r/PussyPass29/05/15 07:30 AM
38

I mean, the dude's slipping in and out of consciousness and they're still trying to pin him as the rapist. mind = blown
/r/MensRights29/05/15 07:00 AM
4

If you admitted to letting some blackout drunk girl slip in and out of unconsciousness while giving you a blowjob on this site, you would have a zillion angry posters calling you a rapist and you're an idiot if you think otherwise.
/r/PussyPass29/05/15 06:56 AM
14

It wasn't a "joke." It was part of a speech she gave to a women's foundation about confidence and her body issues. You guys trying to say she got up there and made some convoluted backhanded insult toward feminists to expose their hypocrisy are reaaaaaaaally reaching here. That's not what this was at all. This wasn't some joke in her stand-up routine or her show.
/r/PussyPass29/05/15 06:53 AM
2

They're wrong and apparently think it was part of her stand-up act or something.
/r/PussyPass29/05/15 06:52 AM
23

I mean, that's a really creative attempt to try and white knight for Amy Schumer but that's not even remotely what happened here. This was part of a speech about confidence she gave to a women's foundation. You're really sitting here trying to peddle the idea that she got up there and backhandedly-insulted all of them? Come on. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. It was a "funny" story about her body image issues and confidence, not some satirical piece meant to expose the hypocrisy of feminists.…
/r/PussyPass29/05/15 06:52 AM
560

A woman blatantly "rapes" a dude by their own retarded feminist definition of rape and somehow they manage to spin it--with a straight fucking face--that he's the rapist. I don't know why I'm fucking surprised but I am. The bottom just keeps getting lower. That thread is honestly horrifying.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:42 AM
3

One accused him of "sexual assault" because he drunkenly tried to grab her and kiss her at a party. The other was an ex-girlfriend who accused him of emotional abuse, because she said she felt like he would leave her if she didn't have sex with him--therefore she didn't consent. Both were acquainted with Emma and were likely urged to report hi by her, since they all reported around the same time.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 03:37 AM
10

It seriously needs to be an AdviceAnimal, too. Scumbag Emma Sulkowicz: BRINGS FEMALE FRIENDS TO PARTY OF BRUTAL ANAL RAPIST GETS TRIGGERED ABOUT RAPE BY BUSINESS CARD
/r/MensRights27/05/15 06:28 AM
13

She really is. I read an article tonight where she said a reporter unzipped her backpack and put a business card in (probably because her hands were full of fucking mattress) and she said the personal space violation triggered memories of her rape.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 06:22 AM
21

I've had an AdviceAnimals thread going about this all day. I'd say about 1 in 10 of the replies in my inbox is still supporting this chick and it's INFURIATING because it's absolutely obvious none of them have read a goddamn thing about this case. They all keep parroting the stupid Jezebel talking point about, "HURR DURR talking nice to your rapist doesn't mean you weren't raped HURRRRR no perfect victims HURRRRRRRR" As if there isn't piles of evidence besides that to prove she's lying if their …
/r/MensRights22/05/15 08:05 AM
2

Did anyone else miss the "satire" disclaimer, too? I was getting apoplectic about the time I got to the JP Morgan thing and realized something was fishy.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 04:00 AM
3

It wasn't until consulting with a friend that she deemed it rape. No, that's what she says now after the text messages came out. Her original story was that he penetrated her while she was "screaming at him to stop, yelling at him to get off of her" and he refused to stop. She clearly knew it was rape in the first version of her story. She also claimed to be terrified to be within a 100 feet of him, despite it now coming out that she went willingly to parties where he was going to be and tried t…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:18 PM
1

I mean, not that drunken regret sex would be much better, but it doesn't even appear that's what happened here. It appears they had fully-consensual, slightly-buzzed-but-not-drunk anal sex. The whole thing doesn't appear to have become rape until after the guy did a fade job on her (at least he looks like he's fading out on her from the texts). It looks more like she did it out of revenge at feeling used or rejected or something.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 02:58 PM
2

Someone who doesn't want to press charges and is still reconciling herself to the idea she was raped Uh, chief, she said the guy choked her, hit her, and brutally anally raped her--forced himself into her unlubricated while pinning her arms down from behind so she couldn't struggle--and that she was immediately terrified of him after that (at least that's the first story she told--it's changed a few times). There was no "reconciling herself to the fact that she was raped." According to her own g…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 02:48 PM
10

Well that does it. She's out of my imaginary threesome where we all sing in the shower aftewards.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 09:12 AM
6

My hope is that he's suing Columbia first because it'll drag a shitload of exculpatory evidence into the record (like the contradictory statements Emma supposedly gave to the kangaroo court) that will make suing Emma a slam dunk.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:54 AM
17

Holy fucking shit I just want to grab you by the ears and shake the shit out of you. How fucking gullible are you? People that get hit, choked, and "brutally anally raped" by someone don't spend months afterward trying to hang out with that person, going to that person's parties, bringing their goddamn female friends to those parties at their rapist's request, helping them with fundraising projects, and telling them they love them. Pull your head out of your ass.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:51 AM
27

You have got to be shitting me. A guy supposedly chokes, hits, and brutally anally rapes a girl. That girl then vigorously continues a friendship with him, attends parties at his request, brings other girls to the parties at his request, volunteers to help him with fundraising, tells him she loves him, etc. And you see a story with two plausible sides. So... Basically... Nothing short of two stone tablets delivered from the Lord God Almighty Himself is going to convince you that this bitch is ly…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:43 AM
1

She wrote a play celebrating female sexuality. Part of that play was about a woman plying a 13-year-old girl with alcohol and raping her and how it was a positive experience for the girl. If you seriously can't see how fucked up that is and how someone like that has zero business being a rape consultant then you need your goddamn head examined. Reverse the genders and maybe your sexist blinders will fall off: A man writes a play about a man plying a 13-year-old girl with alcohol and raping her a…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 08:04 AM
2

They fucked up with the poster big time, though. They should've put some of the actual proof of her lies on it. Just calling her a pretty little liar is handing feminists ammo to go, "Look at all the rape apologists unfairly calling her a liar. Poor Emma suffers yet again." It's so boneheaded that if it weren't for the Twitter account (which seems genuinely against Emma) I'd swear it was some false flag deal by some supporter of hers.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:13 AM
2

I don't know why you're downvoted. You're right. I am 100% for Emma Sulkowicz being named and shamed as the false rape accuser she is--in poster form, in any form. But that poster missed the mark big time and if it weren't for the corresponding Twitter account (that seems to be linked to it) I'd swear it was a feminist false flag deal to make Sulkowicz look even more "oppressed." The poster needed some of the actual facts and proof of Emma's lies on it. Just calling her a pretty liar is just han…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:07 AM
24

Yeah, he "brutally anally raped" her and she eagerly pursued a friendship with him for months afterward. You dumb motherfucker.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:56 AM
-1

Well, it's hyperbole about it being over, but I do think the feminists have won and that things are only going to get worse and worse on that front and that fighting against it is essentially a lost cause. I mean, Eve Ensler being hired as a rape consultant is something a sane society would scorn and ridicule. Instead, it's praised and supported. We are 180 degrees from where we should be.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 06:37 AM
-2

Dat URL tho. But seriously, was there a reason they didn't pick a .com URL? I know it shouldn't, but that .co is going to seriously hurt adoption. People have a mental stigma toward non-.com URLs as being sketchy.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:33 AM
2

No, there was no boycott, but there should have been. Not because of any (real or imagined) feminist content in the movie, but because they hired a lifelong man-hating feminist bigot, who wrote a play celebrating the drunken lesbian rape of a 13-year-old child, to be their feminist rape consultant. In the future, when every action movie has a feminist consultant to avoid anything "problematic," remember to thank all your fellow MRAs here who cared more about not being called misogynistic by the …
/r/MensRights19/05/15 05:44 AM
6

Yes, it's totally not a problem that a Hollywood action movie can't get made without hiring a feminist who has spent her entire life demonizing men to influence the direction of the movie. Nope. Not at all. I mean, they did that back in the 50s, too, right?
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 03:44 PM
9

I mean, it doesn't even matter how good the movie is or if none of the feminist bullshit shows up on screen at all. They hired a feminist misandrist bigot, who has spent her entire life demonizing men and who wrote a play glamorizing the rape of an underage girl by a woman and portrayed it as a positive experience, to consult about rape on the movie and have influence over it. That's horseshit. On principle alone, nobody should support this fucking movie for pulling that. But they will. Even the…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 03:40 PM
36

This one pisses me off the most in how it's been deliberately misreported. Director George Miller invited someone he considered an expert on post-rape trauma (Eve Ensler) to talk with the female actors. She literally wrote a play glamorizing the rape of an underage girl by a woman. This is not misreported. This woman has no Earthly business advising anyone about anything, much less rape.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 03:29 PM
13

You know what fucking kills me about this? Eve Ensler's play celebrated a grown woman plying a 13-year-old girl with alcohol and raping her. It even called it a, quote, "good rape" in the play and portrayed the whole thing as a positive experience for a girl. And noooooooooobody has a problem with her consulting on the Mad Max movie about fucking rape. Society is over, man. The feminists have fucking won. I'm ready for the crash now. Anytime, please.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 03:26 PM
46

You know what tickles the shit out of me about this? Just days earlier Joss was tweeting about how "disappointed" he was in Jeremy Renner and Chris Evans for their "sexist" joke about Black Widow. Now he's getting the same bullshit feminist treatment. It's almost enough to make a guy believe in karma. Like someone else said: Wil Wheaton next please? Please, universe?
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:23 AM
32

I can't wait for the day they turn on Wil Wheaton too. Oh baby oh baby you cannot imagine how much I am waiting for this. It's going to be glorious.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:13 AM
8

I almost feel bad for offering this criticism, especially since it's based on being socially conditioned to see certain colors as masculine or feminine, but..... I think it would help the readability if you changed the colors to something more feminine for the female portion. Red doesn't scream female to me and while reading the graph I kept sort of having to remind myself that the red was women. I know that's stupid, but hey social conditioning is a thing. Maybe light blue for the guys and pink…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:10 AM
1

I reasoned that someone stole your testicles and I'm requesting that you check for evidence.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:06 AM
-4

How about you feel around between your legs for that slit where your balls got surgically removed and then go try to find them?
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:00 AM
26

Oh please oh please oh please let this make it to the front page of r/news.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:35 PM
2

Mini-story time. When I was around college age, I was with this petite little blonde girl and I spent over an hour trying and failing to get my dick inside her. She was plenty wet. It just wouldn't fit. And I'm just a normal sized guy. I finally had to go limp and stuff that thing in with a couple fingers like a marshmallow. Any guy that's been with a few women knows vaginas are not the same size.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/15 04:53 AM
5

Oh baby, I could rant about this one. This will get you torn to shreds on the rest of Reddit, but I find beef curtains to be absolutely revolting. If you're dumb enough to admit to that on Reddit, you'll have a bunch of pissed off women and white knights jumping down your throat and saying how you only feel that way because perfect porn vaginas have skewed your perception. To that I say, really, bitch? Because I'm almost 40 and the porn I grew up with was in magazines and the women had hairy cam…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/15 04:43 AM
1

I would never go so far as to say it doesn't exist. I would, however, say that the vast majority of people (especially women) claiming emotional abuse are completely and totally full of shit and/or just as guilty of the "abuse" themself.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:30 AM
1

You're welcome. Sorry, but "emotional abuse" is usually made-up horseshit.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:28 AM
1

I don't believe you and you're welcome.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:27 AM
0

I'm at the point where when I hear a woman say the words "emotional abuse" my eyes just glaze over and I dismiss everything they're saying as lies. Because it usually is.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:58 AM
62

I post in r/relationships sometimes, and every few weeks a feminist-minded woman wanders in who's absolutely apoplectic that her soon-to-be husband expects her take his last name. r/relationships immediately throws on their white armor and tells her what a dirty sexist her husband is and not to do it. I always post, agreeing with them, and add, "And of course you won't be participating in the equally sexist tradition of having the man buy you an expensive present to wear on your finger before yo…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:50 PM
28

But-but-but Reddit told me men and women are exactly the same except for the plumbing...
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:45 PM
5

Nothing to get angry about? At worst she wasted police resources? The poor little darling is just mentally ill and anybody who doesn't recognize that is just butthurt? Who the fuck upvoted this white knighting garbage post? What would've happened if there had been a black guy that matched the description strolling nearby on a surveillance camera around the time? Even if she'd recanted later on, that guy would've been arrested for rape and that alone is enough to fuck your entire life over. How a…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 03:00 PM
2

Please nobody take this as a defense of the girl (she's a sick little bitch), but how are they charging her with anything, much less involuntary manslaughter? I am not up on this, but I wasn't aware encouraging someone to commit suicide was even a crime, much less involuntary manslaughter (see: ten zillion people online telling others to kill themselves). Is there precedent for this sort of thing?
/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 10:06 AM
8

But- but- but Redditors in the others subreddits assures me that women don't care more drama at work than men...
/r/MensRights25/02/15 09:37 AM
4

Uh, I'm no right-winger, but you pretty much have to be delusional to not see that the left is leading the charge against men.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 06:37 AM
16

Wow. It never occurred to me that there might've been arguments about who should come first in LGBT, but now that you told me there were I am completely fucking unsurprised. That sounds exactly like something those people would fight to the death about. I am also completely unsurprised that women won that argument and got the L put first. I think I'm going to start calling it GLBT just to see if I can make any heads explode.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 05:49 PM
1

Yeah, I have issues with both subs. I think r/mensrights is full of politically correct pussies who think men and women should be (and are mentally) equal. Meanwhile, I think r/theredpill doesn't take men's right issues and the state of the world seriously enough. So, I bounce between.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 09:56 AM
2

r/AskWomen makes 2xc look like a bastion of logic and reason. Once you ask a question there, if you so much ask a follow-up question or ask someone to explain their reasoning, they screech, "Stop invalidating me!" and that's the end of that. You'll be downvoted and banned.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 09:54 AM
5

Yeah, sometimes it backfires. Depends on the subreddit and topic probably.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 06:52 PM
3

Please oh please oh please OP please let someone photoshop you up an identical page with one good example of female privilege on it and stealthily put it up there with the rest of them. Please please please.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 06:51 PM
32

Right there with ya. Made this one just for r/theredpill and r/mensrights. Not just because of the doxxing, though. Because when you're arguing with some dipshit in another subreddit, it doesn't matter how right your argument is, how completely incontrovertible what you're saying is, the second the sore loser realizes you're "one of those red pill assholes" that's all anybody hears. It is annoying as fuck.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 02:57 PM
1

"Don't go into Janet's office right now," someone tells you as you are heading into her office for something necessary. "She's just having a really hard time right now."
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 01:51 PM
2

The amount of sour grapes "This story is clearly bullshit!" in the comments section of this thread is kinda pathetic. You guys really need to get out more if you think this story is some kind of unbelievable myth.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/15 06:55 PM
1

That's all fine and dandy but that's not how you phrased it before. You stated it like it's some universal truth that there's nothing wrong with being a slut and now you're lawyering.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 06:45 PM
10

There's nothing wrong with being a "slut". That's a matter of opinion. That's yours. My opinion is that fucking so many people it's statistically impossible for you to not have herpes is probably not something you should do.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:29 PM
-1

No, you're right. Women by and large have lower sex drives than men. Testosterone, for one thing, is known to increase sex drive in both sexes and men simply have way more than women. For another, it's part of the reason women only go after the top 20% of guys. Think about it. If you love cake, you'll try any cake. But if you only kind of like cake, it takes a really damn good cake to make you really want it. There may be some evidence they get more physical pleasure out of the act, though. Mult…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 05:54 AM
1

He isn't Dark Triad, dude, for fuck's sake. He's legitimately got mental problems.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 05:47 AM
3

Oddly enough, those same women are just fine and dandy with the sexist tradition of a woman--and only the woman--receiving a large expensive present (ring) when getting engaged.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 05:44 AM
0

Dude, you could not have less of a clue what you're talking about right now. Google and read up on some of the crazy cult bullshit that Cruise put Katie Holmes and Nazanin Boniadi through and then come back and lecture us all about how he's just like any other redpill guy with an ex-wife. The guy may be alpha as fuck, but he's clearly got a fucking screw loose somewhere.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 07:14 AM
6

It doesn't. Fucking. Matter. A bathroom is not some magical chaos zone where you can perform lewd and lascivious acts and not be held criminally liable. You would be charged with a sex crime if you did anything like that. They would not. Welcome to reality.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 07:09 AM
4

Dude. People, a politician even, have been arrested just for tapping their foot in a bathroom stall as a "come fuck me" signal. If you took out your dick and pissed on a woman's shoes, with witnesses especially, you would be charged with a fucking sex crime and spend the rest of your natural life as a registered sex offender. You could not be more 100% ass-backwards wrong on this.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 06:58 AM
1

The topic should be on top of r/relationships right now, so you can join the conversation, if you want to help the poor guy. Uh... 1) We aren't supposed to do that because the admins will spank us. 2) The thread isn't on the front page of r/relationships. It's a month-old locked thread. ???
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 03:26 PM
5

Probably true. He's completely freaked out at least three female partners that I can think of off the top of my head: Nicole Kidman, Katie Holmes, and that Arab actress whose name I'm too lazy to Google (she was on Homeland on Showtime). All had bad experiences on the Tom Cruise crazy train.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 03:20 PM
1

This should be the goddamn top comment. Instead, -2. This thread is train wreck of tinfoil hats. Sugar is fucking fine--in moderation, like a million other things in life.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 03:12 PM
1

Um... Dude... The reason he's getting divorced is because like a month ago a tape got leaked between him and Anthony Pellicano where he admitted to fucking a Hungarian model who's now accusing him of rape. "Going beta" or not, he's getting divorced because he got caught cheating.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 01:28 PM
2

I wish you guys would address all the clueless guys that have flooded the subreddit who think alpha traits are only positive traits and negative ones are beta traits. Like for example, saying violence is beta behavior, which isn't true at all--plenty of violent psychos that are alpha as fuck who beat women off with a stick. The subject matter in this thread falls under the same problem. Guys thinking seducing married women is beta behavior just because it's not positive or because it personally …
/r/TheRedPill26/12/14 11:34 AM
22

The victim-blaming in the comments made me rage. Some of them are acting like he's an idiot for not getting a vasectomy and like it's his fault. This, from r/relationships, the subreddit that will normally condemn you if you show anything less than complete 100% trust in your female partner. That place is an anti-male shithole. Even when a guy gets victimized they find a way to make it his fault.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 03:30 PM
9

Goddamn I am so sick of this bullshit with feminists demanding things geared toward men change to cater to women. "I don't like that this movie is just about boyhood and not girlhood." "I don't like that this comic book features women drawn in ways attractive to men." "I don't like that this video game features a single woman getting killed among the thousand men that get killed in it." "Then make your own fucking movies, your own fucking comic books, and your own fucking video games."
/r/MensRights24/12/14 03:22 PM
5

Honestly? I think going with something like anti-male prejudice would be better than misandry or androphobia most of the time. It's easy to forget here, but your average person on the street has no idea what the word misandry means. It's not beat over their heads by the media the way the word misogynist is. Something like anti-male prejudice would have a more desired reaction, in my opinion. Besides that, among people who do know the word misandry, feminists have almost succeeded in making a jok…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 12:38 PM
2

I always thought it was crazy that feminists thought a good way to show that women are just as capable and strong as men was by encouraging what are basically good old fashioned attacks of the vapors.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 12:17 PM
3

Just don't hire women. I know a guy who started his own extremely successful business about twenty years ago and almost lost the whole goddamn thing in the middle of it because some worthless female employee he had to fire revenge-accused him of sexual harassment. He doesn't hire women now. (He doesn't tell people that, though, because openly stating that can get you sued, too.)
/r/TheRedPill13/12/14 11:14 PM
2

In the US anyway, there absolutely are certain non-white races that are automatically handicapped as far as SMV goes. Denying that is just denying reality.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/14 10:55 PM
2

Absolutely, yes. But I have a feeling your thread is going to get bombarded with the usual delusional seddit-type "Confidence is all you need!" guys that have really shit up the subreddit the last year or so. The reality is you can always raise your SMV. However, if you're starting as a 3/10 or something, you're probably never going to be a 9/10 no matter what you do. 5 or 6 out of 10 may be your realistic best.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/14 10:51 PM
7

I'm at the point where I'm instantly skeptical of any rape allegation anyway, but man when I hear "gang rape" my bullshit detector just fires up into overdrive. I'm not saying it never happens, but come on. Guys who would rape a woman are an extreme minority to begin with, so it takes some screwball odds-beating to end up with five or six guys who are all willing to rape a woman. Then they also have to be dumb enough to risk doing it in front of each other, etc. The whole thing just quickly beco…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 03:13 PM
1

This is insightfully spot-on and should be way more upvoted.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 02:38 PM
1

You would not F'ing believe how much I've been downvoted in r/relationships for saying that exact thing. Every time someone comes in there with work drama of any kind, no matter how petty, the learned teenagers over there scream for them to go running to HR. As if HR is a kindly benefactor who only has your best interests at heart.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:56 AM
2

Uh, nobody should be advocating violence against women because it's a bad idea that will land you in jail and make you a social pariah. But are we going to pretend now that women aren't attracted to violent--even abusive--men now because we don't like the implication? Because that's not very redpill to deny reality like that. This smells like more of the "alpha is only positive traits that I personally aspire to" bullshit that's infested the sub lately.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/14 12:41 AM
4

See my comment below. The guy above is right. A prostitute is much much more statistically likely to have herpes, for example, than a random bar slut. Condoms only cut the risk of transmission on that by 20%. You can't fuck several hundred dudes without statistical probability biting you in the ass on that one.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/14 02:56 PM
2

Well, you're making a mistake. 1 in 6 people have herpes. Condoms only cut the risk by 20%. Take a bar rat who's fucked 50 people and a prostitute who's fucked 500 and do the math. That means, statistically, the slut has been exposed to herpes with about 9 partners and the prostitute's been exposed to herpes with about 84 partners. HPV has similar issues with condoms, and gonorrhea and chlamydia aren't bulletproof with them either. You're better off fucking the bar slut, bareback even (although …
/r/TheRedPill11/11/14 02:53 PM
-3

Why you shouldn't fuck a prostitute: Herpes. 1 in 6 people have it and condoms only cut the risk of transmission by 20%. I'd rather take my chances with the run of the mill slut who's number is still in the double digits and not the hundreds of a prostitute instead. Edit to add: Okay, downvoters, why don't you tell me why I'm wrong while you're at it. Like I said in above comment, take a bar slut who's fucked 50 and a prostitute who's fucked 500. By the statistics, the slut has been exposed to a…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/14 02:45 PM
2

How fucking far does your head have to be up your own delusional ass to think that you, as a white Western woman, are more oppressed than gay men and they should be helping you? That is one nuclear hamster right there.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 12:36 PM
1

Yeah, it's definitely more than 95%. That was just an example.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/14 05:41 AM
1

I really think there's not nearly as much thought put into cat calling as most of the people talking about it seem to think. I mean, I don't do it, I've never done it, but I get it. How do you react as a guy when you see a really hot chick? You get this upswell of immediate lust, this urge to grab her, to fuck her, to do something dammit. Your biology is literally telling you to make action. Most of us clamp that shit down for the sake of being civilized and do nothing beyond looking. But some g…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/14 05:38 AM
3

Well, I sort of agree. I do think that 95% of the guys saying they're virgin by choice are full of shit and hamstering like you said. However, I think for the minority that actually are virgin by choice, my comment is accurate. That's who I was referring to.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/14 05:25 AM
1

But... but they're so hot... Maybe if I just put my dick in them once. Just the one time. Yeah.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 06:58 PM
10

I have seen that this isn't a popular opinion, but I am immediately suspicious of any guy that makes it into his twenties as a virgin by choice. (Guys who are too awkward/ugly/whatever to get laid are a different thing.) A guy that age that's been a virgin by choice has either got serious psychological issues, a hormone defecit, or is a closeted homosexual. It's just not normal for men to have that weak of a sex drive that they've never been driven to do it even once. Testosterone is a hell of a…
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 06:53 PM
1

I've said this before, but I really feel like this is an oversimplification and the "few female friends" and "lots of male friends" issues should be treated separately. They're not mutually inclusive at all. There are almost no women I would want as friends. They make terrible friends. Why would I fault a woman for recognizing the same thing? That's silly. She should be friends with people who make terrible friends just because they're her gender? And if she doesn't make that illogical decision …
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 06:20 PM
1

I agree, except I do think it should be illegal and prosecuted but as a minor offense in both cases--like misdemeanor level and the teacher gets fired. I mean, the teenager may not be a victim in most cases but that doesn't mean we can have teachers fucking students--it'd be chaos.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 04:22 PM
1

This is part of the reason I roll my eyes when I see clueless people on here say that getting angry is a beta trait. Yeah, sure thing buddy. That six foot linebacker with a hair-trigger temper whose internal engine runs on pure rage sure is beta. What woman wants a guy like that, right?
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 04:20 PM
46

You ever see a spoiled little kid who gets every expensive toy given to him the second he asks for it? Ever see that same kid get a toy he didn't want instead of the one he was expecting and the way he'll recoil in horror and disgust instead of being grateful for something some people don't get at all? Pretty much the exact same thing. A big amount of female behavior can be explained by looking at spoiled children.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 07:05 PM
1

In your post, you seem to buy into the idea that a girl having consensual sex with her teacher is a victim Not at all. I absolutely believe in the majority of cases of female students having sex with male teachers that there is no victim whatsoever. I believe actual incidents of victimization are the minority. That said, I do believe female students are slightly more likely to be legitimately victimized by a teacher than male students, just due to the different sexual natures of males and female…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:00 PM
1

I totally agree with that. I just think the way it's applied to female teachers now (usually very leniently) is the correct way for both genders.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:33 PM
-1

I'd argue that it should still be a felony, because it will be very difficult to determine whether coercion occurred. That's wrong. That's the same kind logic that causes feminists to assume men accused of rape are guilty. Innocence must be presumed and that extends to not arbitrarily assuming a crime is worse than it appears without evidence. This goes double when you believe, as I do, that the overwhelming majority of student/teacher sexual relationships involved no coercion at all. Edit to ad…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:26 PM
-1

Exactly. That kid was no victim and that was no rape. And legally treating it as such just because society has made the wrong-headed and sexist decision to always react that way with female students is just doubling down on the wrongness. Again, not to say the teacher shouldn't be punished legally or fired. She absolutely should.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:21 PM
0

...and that's not up to you or me to decide, it's the law. Yes. The law is wrong in this case. It's sexist and wrong. The male victim should given the same consideration. I disagree completely. The majority of the time, male or female, there is no victim and the female student should be treated the way the male student is instead of the law and society going on a white knight crusade for her maidenhood. It should be treated as the minor illegal incident it is unless there is evidence of real vic…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:18 PM
-2

Right. And that's why it should be illegal (though a minor crime) and the teacher should be fired. But it shouldn't automatically be treated like a rape or like there's a sex victim, because the overwhelmingly majority of the time neither of those things is true.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:14 PM
1

My opinion is that consensual sex between a minor post-pubescent student and a teacher shouldn't be legal, but that it's not a hanging offense and should be a misdemeanor at worse. Also, the teacher should be shitcanned.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:13 PM
1

I'm not arguing against punishing the adult at all. But I believe when the sex is purely consensual that it should be a slap-on-the-wrist type situation legally (which is how it typically is for female teachers) and the teacher should lose their teaching certificate.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:05 PM
-2

That's where I disagree. It's not necessarily predatory behavior, especially when it comes to teenage boys. Both teenage boys and girls are perfectly capable of being the sexual pursuers or the the sexually pursued or any gradation in between. That doesn't mean it isn't wrong for the adult to do it or that it should be legal or the adult shouldn't be punished. It just doesn't mean there was a predator/victim in most of the cases.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:04 PM
5

Someone should make a fake article about a woman who cuts off her breasts because her boyfriend said her tits were too small and put a picture of two sliced up cantaloupes on it. Just watch the outrage come in like a tsunami on that one.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 03:41 PM
-1

I absolutely want male victims to be taken seriously and be treated the same way as women. But the vast majority of teenage boys who have sex with their teachers are not victims and shouldn't be automatically assumed to be ones unless there's evidence of something beyond consensual sex. It's wrong when that assumption is made about teenage girls and it's wrong when it's just as wrong when made about teenage boys. And again, I'm not saying it should be legal. But just because something is a crime…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 03:38 PM
0

Are there any geneticists on the subreddit? Because if so, one of you motherfuckers needs to dedicate your life to isolating the genes that make OP's ex the way she is and then infect the rest of the X chromosomes of the world with it.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 02:22 PM
1

Dude, this is awesome is what it is. Now find an agreeable girl, let your ex "catch" you fucking her, and I bet you dollars to donuts you can spin it into an on-the-spot threesome. She sounds desperate enough to do it. You pull that off and I may just have to fuck you.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 02:02 PM
1

No, this is incorrect. "Alpha" is not positive or negative traits or those that we find personally desirable. For the purposes of redpill, "alpha" traits are those that women respond to sexually. And sometimes those are not desirable traits. See: Dark Triad alphas. Anger (backed up by being big enough to be physically intimidating) absolutely is an alpha trait.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 06:19 AM
6

What do they do about tipping? Do women just not tip?
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 06:13 AM
3

I know the popular opinion is to hate on women who don't like other women and don't have female friends, but I disagree entirely. Women are gigantic pains in the ass and (usually) awful as friends. I don't want women as friends. Why would I fault a woman for the same thing? Especially considering women treat other women worse in a lot of cases. Now having a lot of guys friends? I will absolutely judge the shit out of a girl for that, because we all know what's going on there. Beta orbiters and a…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/14 03:17 PM
1

Anger's definitely not a beta trait. Hell, women are attracted to straight-up violent angry psychos--as long as they can physically back up that anger anyway. It makes sense. If you were a cave woman looking for the best mate to protect you and your offspring, would you want the meek guy or the hair-trigger violent guy who'll murder anybody who even thinks of touching you?
/r/TheRedPill23/10/14 02:53 PM
1

I would also say the environment itself is a problem. Young men aren't as temperamentally suited to sitting still at a desk for 8 hours straight as young women are. We are simply made to be more physically active than them.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 02:29 PM
7

This is completely anecdotal (and 20 years ago because I'm old), but I had several female teachers in high school and grade school who were legitimate man-haters and were openly more hostile to male students. I also had some male teachers who were real assholes, but they were equal opportunity assholes.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 02:23 PM
2

Everyone's giving good suggestions, but the fastest way to get this shit straightened is to call your local media. Seriously. Call the tipline for every local news station, every newspaper, etc. Give them your name and number, the kid's name, etc. You might try some of the big cable news outlets too if you're feeling really ambitious. Watch how quick those cowards in your school's administration back down when their bullshit gets a spotlight on it. Seriously. Do this. Fuck, give me the kid's nam…
/r/MensRights23/10/14 02:15 PM
70

As someone with a bit of a black woman fetish who's dated several from a majority black area, this hasn't been my experience at all (or maybe I didn't get what you intended from your post). I personally have found black women to have hypergamy on steroids: unabashedly materialistic, unabashedly self-interested, extremely entitled, fickle, etc. In a way, it was nice because they're so open and unashamed about it unlike white women who try to disguise it, but it's also exhausting. Dating a black w…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/14 05:24 AM
44

I... I am really conflicted about this. My inner asshole is really enjoying the fuck out of watching a woman get a taste of the same medicine I've personally watched many guys my own age get and is also really pissed that the media finally gives a shit when this happens to a woman. My inner fair guy says this is bullshit no matter which gender it happens to and that no kid on this planet deserves that much legally-mandated child support.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 05:51 PM
27

It needs to be capped at a lower-class bare minimum level, no matter how rich the parent is. If the parent wants to give more? Great. If not? Your parent's a greedy piece of shit--sorry about your luck. The government has no business telling parents they have to provide their children luxurious lifestyles (and we all know where the money really goes anyway).
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 05:41 PM
1

I never knew that. Even if it started that way, it's become one. I've heard variations of it all over the place, Al Bundy even.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 05:32 PM
3

Just wait. If the feminists don't make it illegal, technology is going to solve this problem and women are going to be so obsolete so fast that we'll see a complete societal role reversal. Imagine that there's an implant or a small device you wear, that you come home, and there's a beautiful woman personally designed by you, who isn't really there but can be seen and who can be touched by you or anyone else you allow (who has the same device) perfectly simulated so that your brain cannot tell th…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 05:13 PM
54

Makes sense to me. You know the old adage: "A misogynist is a man who hates women as much as women hate other women."
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 05:04 PM
3

I could see that. Public school is becoming a really hostile place for boys, though, education-wise. I could see an all-boys school being better in that regard, since it's hard to discriminate against boys if there are no girls there. Seems like pick your poison to me.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 05:00 PM
6

This place has picked up some of the rest of Reddit's bad habits as it's gotten bigger. Things like being pedantic, overreacting and being oversensitive, not understanding hyperbole, not understanding generalizations, etc. People used to say in this sub that the country would be better off if women couldn't vote (and that is nothing but the crooked truth, regardless of how "unfair" it would be). Now that comment will get you downvoted and 30 comments of some dipshit arguing with you.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 04:57 PM
3

I went to high school in a rural area and about fifteen years ago they started making noise about getting rid of shop class. Many of us went to school board meetings and argued against it, telling them that this was probably the only thing keeping many boys going to school at all. They went ahead and nixed it anyway. Public school is not a good place for boys anymore.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 04:51 PM
1

That's not true at all. There are plenty of alpha-as-fuck murderers, Dark Triad guys, etc. You can be alpha and objectively be a terrible person. Alpha does not mean "good."
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 04:47 PM
7

It is completely pathetic that this comment, which is very clearly not advocating murder, got downvoted this hard. This is the kind of poor reading comprehension and overreaction I expect from SJWs, not redpillers.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 04:33 PM
7

That thread was depressing as fuck. That poor dumb bastard honestly thinks she didn't cheat on him.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 04:30 PM
21

I've been downvoted here for saying this, but I'll say it again because I don't believe the cause of men's rights can really go forward without acknowledging this simple reality: Women simply have it far easier than men (at least white Western women). Yes, they have some gender-specific struggles that men don't have to deal with, but if you were to objectively weigh the struggles that each gender faces and their seriousness, men have it harder. I mean, way harder. It's not even close. I've had p…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 02:32 PM
1

I'm not disagreeing with the message (it's accurate), but is that article bullshit or something? Because none of the women's quotes sound even remotely like a real person talking. Something unnatural about it, like someone wrote dialogue for a fiction story who's bad at writing dialogue. Plus, they all speak in a very similar way, despite being generations apart.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 06:51 AM
1

I think it was a little of Column A and a little of Column B and you're both right.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 05:41 PM
12

I feel your pain. I flit back and forth between r/theredpill and r/mensrights and parts of both subreddits frustrate me. r/rmensrights doesn't see women correctly and buys into the politically correct bullshit that men and women are basically the same with different plumbing. But I like the attention they bring to legal injustices and the biased courts. Those are things that might actually be fixable. r/theredpill sees women the way they really are. However, I personally don't feel like they're …
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 05:38 PM
2

Strong agree. Like anything, there's a grain of truth in there, but this reminds me a lot of the clueless guys who see running around with huge egos who think just sticking their magic dick in a woman is enough to make her get off. It's man-hamstering to protect their egos from not having a goddamn clue how to get a woman off.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 05:20 PM
1

Eh, I'm not buying this. I mean, I believe there's some truth to it--if a woman is more sexually attracted to you, of course she's going to orgasm easier. But the main component of a woman being able to orgasm seems to be her individual physical make-up. I'm old. I've been with a lot of women. Almost all of them needed something different than the next to orgasm and had varying levels of ease of orgasm. Some women needed a certain pressure or a certain position. Some women could only come from h…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 05:10 PM
9

I always laugh at the MRA guys who think "feminism is starting to lose its hold!" Yeah, no it's not. If anything it's accelerating. I honestly believe feminism and gynocentrism are going to bring on the full-on decline and destruction of Western civilization.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 04:47 PM
5

I'm old. I don't know if it was more or less common, but it was happening 20 years ago when I was in high school. The definite difference was back then there were no cell phones to document it. Oh, the rumor mill heard about it, but people either didn't give a shit or chalked it up to lying, bragging teenagers.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 04:16 PM
5

Hahaha, this. I've worked in some offices full of women. I don't think there was ever a day where at least one woman didn't break down in tears about something. Not to mention the tantrums, etc. They really are children. Or just slightly above them.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 03:21 PM
1

Those 25-30 year-old-women with professionally shot photos always weirded me out, too. I mean, I know a lot of women in real life that age. As far as I know, I don't know any that have gone and had a professional photographer take pictures of them in a fucking park or reclining against some brick building. At least not since they had their senior pictures taken in high school. Yet, there are tons of them on those dating sites with those pictures. Who the fuck does that? Who just goes and gets pi…
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 03:04 PM
3

Yeah, I hate participating in these threads, because although I want the law to treat people who do this the same regardless of gender, I'd really prefer male teachers get treated the way female teachers do and not the other way around. Go ahead and downvote, people. I don't care. I don't think a post-pubescent teenager having consensual sex with an adult teacher is a crime, nor is the teacher a pedophile. Lose their teaching certificate? I'll back that part.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:39 PM
7

Don't take any advice from Reddit about this. In situations like this, Reddit will almost always saddle up their high horse advise you to do what's "right" instead of what's smart because they're not the ones who have to deal with the fallout or get burned at the stake. Also, Reddit is mostly young and naive and thinks life is fucking fair. It usually isn't.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:29 PM
7

True, but there is not even a snowball's chance in hell of that happening.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 04:17 PM
141

Can you imagine how fast a woman's vagina would dry up if you actually whipped out this app and expected her to do it? I bet it would make that same sound it makes when you're trying to suck the last few drops out of a fountain drink from McDonald's.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 04:07 PM
14

I'm a firm believer that most people--the vast majority--would benefit greatly from doing LSD or shrooms a couple times a year. It can be like years of therapy in one night. Cleans out the cobwebs. Makes you see things more clearly than you ever have in your whole life, without your ego or emotions getting in the way.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 03:39 PM
2

Everybody's poo-pooing on this and pointing out all the downsides and backlash that it definitely would cause, but you know what? I don't give the slightest of fucks about any of it. If it keeps a couple guys from having their lives destroyed by a false accusation or makes one serial accuser think twice about doing it again, then I say bring on the shitstorm. Something has to give.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 03:19 PM
2

Have you noticed all the women claiming to have PTSD now, too? I think that one pisses me off more than the fake rape claims. I imagine it probably sucks being a combat soldier with actual PTSD from watching your friends die and having a bunch of attention whores on the internet claiming to have PTSD because their "abusive ex-boyfriend" yelled at them once or twice. They need to give the soldiers' one a new name now or something, like Combat Stress Disorder or something better.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 03:11 PM
13

If you're going to do that, while you're at it, can you make a rule against the posts in every fucking thread that say something like, "Stop concerning yourself with this and go lift." Cause no matter how red pill relevant your content, no matter how perfectly you explain it, there's at least one of those concern trolls in every thread. Criticism of the content is fine, of course, and a whole other thing. But the sub would be pretty dead if we all listened to those idiots and didn't discuss anyt…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 03:03 PM
5

No, it really wouldn't.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 07:02 PM
4

Except women actually DO end up in shallow graves because of this shit, dude. So maybe we ought to talk about it despite your feelz.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 11:07 AM
1

Serious question, do they not garnish when it comes to disability? Or do they not garnish for alimony? I would've thought the state would've done that and not even given the guy a choice like they do with child support.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 05:51 AM
-1

That was one hell of a good and truthful rant.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 03:27 PM
12

You know, every once in a while some woman shows up in r/relationships lamenting that her boyfriend is against legal marriage and I explain pretty much the same things OP just laid out (under a different account--this one is banned there). I am always--always--met with the most insane vitriolic responses and downvoted to hell. They argue with the statistics. They scream "Tax benefits!" and "Hospital visits!" over and over as if those make up for the downsides of marriage. They flat refuse to acc…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:39 PM
7

Yeah. It's just funny that even with all those other guys doing that, a guy who they would not otherwise give the slightest fuck about can make them fall apart just because he didn't rank her quite as high as she thought he should've.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 05:17 PM
2

How about a little of Column A and a little of Column B?
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 05:13 PM
2

The other thing they never portray in these physically abusive relationships is that the woman is almost always just as fucked up as the guy is and is just as involved in it. The media depiction of the meek little woman who gets beat on by her ogre husband is a fairy tale most of the time. Damaged people usually end up with damaged people.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 03:47 PM
56

I have a related story about making a stripper cry once. Like a decade or so, I was in college, and we used to frequent this local strip club on the weekends. And there was this one stripper, I can't remember her stage name anymore so we'll just call her Lacy. Lacy was gorgeous, but this was a pretty high-end strip club so she wasn't even nearly the hottest girl there. So, I'm there with some guys one night and Lacy comes and sits down next to me and she's doing the usual stripper song and dance…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 03:05 PM
4

Most of that "hardwiring" comes from how we raise our children. I could not disagree with this more. As a former farm kid, anyone who grew up on one can tell you that male and female animals generally behave differently. I have never understood how anyone can think human beings are the one magical exception to this.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:46 PM
6

Sounds like r/relationships in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:22 PM
3

The point wasn't flawed. You just totally missed it. Like, completely. The point wasn't that she isn't mentally ill, like you stupidly took it to be. I have no idea whether she is or not. The point was that, because she's a woman, everybody in that thread is falling all over themselves to assume she's mentally ill and excuse and downplay her actions--which they absolutely would not be doing if she were a man. That was the point, dummy.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 07:24 AM
2

Try not to be so accusatory without knowing the full details. Hey, do you hear that sound? Listen real close and you might. That's the point sailing over your head at about Mach 4.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:52 AM
14

Check out the r/news comment section if you haven't had your daily dose of rage: http://np.reddit.com/r/news/comments/2fvtvi/woman_smiles_for_mugshot_after_killing_kids/ Half a dozen or more comments downplaying what she did as mental illness and at least one comment--I shit you not--sympathizing with how bad the mother will feel once she gets help. The pussy pass is alive and well here at Reddit.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 03:25 PM
9

He's not talking about your writing style, dude, he's talking about your fucking line breaks. I don't know if you copy and pasted it from something else, but you completely fucked up the formatting and every paragraph is broken into several double-spaced lines. I don't know what kind of setup you have that it looks normal for you, but it's unreadable for the rest of us.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 06:11 AM
2

Give me a break. This is not simply reporting on something and is way past the pale.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:22 AM
2

Yes I do, and example please? If it happens "all the time" you should be able to give me an example or two of mass amounts of sports journalists condemning sports fans as a whole like what's happening with gaming, right? Go ahead and enlighten me, because I've never seen that.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:12 AM
1

Sadly there are threads and comments in the gaming subreddits from (as far as I know) real gamers complaining about SJW shit all the time. Usually it's them whining about a female character being too sexualized or something like that, boobs being too big, etc. It's sickening.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 06:09 PM
3

Eh... I could see them criticizing the perceived segment of sports fans that did something bad (like if a woman got groped at a game or something). I could see them going on about a "bad element" among sports fans or something. But I can't see them ever issuing a vitriolic blanket condemnation of most sports fans the way the gaming media is doing on gamers.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:59 PM
5

Here's the analogy I always use for this. Let's say I don't like being hugged. Let's say I have a friend who wants to hug me. He keeps trying to hug me and I keep telling him no. Then we hang out for a few hours and have a good time. Afterwards, he tries to hug me again and, because I feel guilty and even though I don't really want to, I don't tell him no and he hugs me. Did I suddenly lose my agency? Did I suddenly lose my ability as a goddamn adult to tell someone not to do something? No? I di…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 05:56 PM
12

This whole thing is just fucking surreal. I mean, gaming journalists are actively talking about how much they hate gamers. Can you imagine sports journalists talking about how much they hate sports fans? Or music journalists talking shit on people who listen to music or something? It's insane. Any other media, this shit would never fly.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:35 PM
3

This. Are going to start pretending statistical probability isn't a real thing now? Because that's what the fucking feminists do every time divorce statistics are brought up.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:17 AM
3

This may be too controversial for me to say even here, but I firmly believe there are more false rape claims than real ones. I can't prove it, of course, but there's some logic behind my thinking. The more heinous an act is, the less people there are who are willing to do it (see: the amount of robberies versus the smaller amount of murders, for example). Filing a false rape claim to get even with someone and ruin their life, while heinous, isn't quite as heinous as actually raping someone. Ther…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:14 AM
1

Welp, I'll see you fuckers on the moon. Free Luna!
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 10:22 PM
6

No shit. All these fraternal groups are disappearing anyway and they can't even let these organizations die with dignity.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 05:51 AM
2

Wait, who's on first?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 03:46 PM
8

He has a prenup, and everyone here is acting like they don't exist and she's going to get half his money. Prenups get thrown out, but either way they don't cover child support. He'll end up paying out the ass for that, well above and beyond what is necessary and where do you think that extra money will go? Maybe not, but just because she had bad intentions at the start of the relationship doesn't mean that she couldn't have changed once she fell in love with him. That is really insanely naive. S…
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:08 PM
2

So, you don't think it's a men's rights issue, or at the very least says something about the way society views men, that hundreds of fucking people upvoted comments encouraging this guy to give another chance to a proven liar who just wanted him for his money and is almost guaranteed to financially rape him later on? You don't see a problem there? Really? Really?
/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:18 PM
10

Did you not read my post all the way? I said it very well may be. I'm more concerned with the fact that hundreds of fucking people upvoted the comments telling this guy--fictional or not--to give another chance to someone who's guaranteed to divorce-rape him. If you can't see the very real thing that says about how much consideration society gives me, you need to think about it a little harder.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:16 PM
3

Hundreds of people--hundreds of fucking people--upvoted comments that encouraged this guy to give another chance to a proven cheater and liar who admitted to just going after him for his bank account... Hundreds of people encouraged this guy to give another chance to someone who is absolutely guaranteed to divorce-rape him down the road. And you honestly don't see how that sort of widespread attitude toward men and marriage is a men's rights issue? Seriously?
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:57 PM
0

It's just an expression, dude. It refers to the unfair way men are financially destroyed by divorce through "dividing" of assets, alimony, child support, etc.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:51 PM
3

Won't change a goddamn thing. Druggings are already way, way more rare than the rape hysterics make them out to be. The vast majority of the people who claim to have been drugged were just plain drunk. They'll just claim there must be some new drug that their nail polish didn't pick up. Anyone who thinks they won't is vastly underestimating the ability of these type of people to delude themselves and avoid responsibility for their actions.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:38 PM
4

Hundreds of people upvoted the comments encouraging this guy to give another chance to a woman who is almost guaranteed (in my humble opinion) to divorce-rape him down the road.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:26 PM
46

It's either that, or there was some external reason she had to tell him. Like, someone or something was going to somehow spill the beans. Maybe someone at the wedding? Call me a big cynic, but I am skeptical of someone who can cheat for six months straight and marry someone just for their bank account having even the amount of conscience it would take to feel guilty enough to want to tell him at all.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:13 AM
5

Well, he was always going on about what an "alpha male" he was (like, actually using the words). Something something red pill something something MRA. You can see how that went.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:37 PM
15

Fuck yeah, I got this. Samson was a certifiable Israelite red pill, alpha male badass. He was a Nazirite, a member of a religious group forbidden to cut their hair and other things. God gave him bona fide super-strength on the condition that he stick to his Nazirite tenets, including not cutting his hair. So, Samson, red pill as he is, goes and gets himself a bad case of oneitis with a Philistine woman, a people not exactly beloved by Samson's at the time. They marry and he offers her people a b…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 06:06 PM
1

Yeah and I mean, it's not like it doesn't still say something about male-female interaction. I drew the conclusion that the men tried harder with the women present, while the women gave no fucks whether the men were there or not.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 03:54 AM
3

Nope, you're right and the OP is wrong. The men actually did better with the women in the room and men being in the room had no effect on the women.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 07:14 PM
1

Dude. You better go buy a lottery ticket, because you are one seriously, magically-enchanted, lucky motherfucker to beat those odds.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:03 PM
1

How come the eyes never get mentioned? I don't have yellow fever by any stretch, but I do find Asian women very sexy and it's not the supposed submissiveness or stereotypes. Nor is it the slenderness, although that's a definite plus. It's the eyes. The eyes of Asian women are sexy as fuck. It kills me that women in Korea have plastic surgery to make their eyes look like white women.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 05:20 PM
2

Not in the US, no, and here's the legal reasoning. In the eyes of the law, the right to support by the parents belongs to the child--not to the parents. So, the parents can't absolve each other of the financial responsibility. The child theoretically could, but we don't allow minors to enter in contracts, so that's out the window. The only legal way to absolve yourself of responsibility for a minor child in the US is for someone else to adopt the child and assume your role. And a biological moth…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 04:37 PM
0

Uh, I get if you don't agree it's instructive (I disagree), but it absolutely is a blue pill example. It's a herd of white knights running defense for a sketchy chick. That's about as blue pill as it gets.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 01:30 PM
0

As I said above, it's an example of the lengths women and white knights will collectively go to to cover for a woman. It's instructive. And if you don't think it is, downvote it and move on. But thank you for the concern trolling.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 10:13 AM
8

I agree, but it was less about that and more an example of the ridiculous lengths white knights and women will go to to try and absolve and cover for other women.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 10:11 AM
19

They seriously fucking do that every single time a guy comes in there with a girlfriend who's been caught all-but red handed. They usually start it with a wishy-washy, "Well, it's poooooooossible..." followed by some ridiculous fucking potential scenario straight out of a sitcom.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 05:00 AM
13

I agree. Saying incel is voluntary or a choice is like saying a guy who's never heard of airplanes chooses not to fly because all he knows to do is flap his damn arms.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 03:40 PM
10

You know what pisses me off about this? The suggestion, pushed by our feminized society (and articles like this), that the only reason men don't cry as much as women is because of cultural conditioning and that obviously all us guys that don't cry are just broken, repressed women with penises. It's horseshit. Yes, guys should be free to cry and express their emotions without judgement. And--no question--cultural conditioning does play some part in us holding in tears. But it's not fucking all of…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:16 PM
7

The funniest thing about her whole story is that she is completely clueless that the very reason nobody helped her is because the attacker was a woman. I mean, if the attacker was a dude, I guarantee you at least a few brave knights would've rushed to the rescue. Instead, all these dudes saw two women fighting with no way to break them up without laying hands on a female, and their synapses starting sizzling with the strain of what to do, and boom it was over. This is what happens when you send …
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 01:50 PM
13

It absolutely boggles my mind how there are kickstarters for the stupidest things that have raised five times as much but this is still struggling for funds.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 08:37 PM
2

Goddamn that's spot on. Very insightful. She's literally treating it like a friendzoning.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 12:27 PM
9

Man, they just need to go ahead and come up with another title for military guys with PTSD, like Combat Stress Disorder or something with a name that implies military, because women are never going to stop trying to appropriate PTSD for themselves. Anything that gives women the opportunity to play victim, they're going to try to take it.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 06:10 AM
9

It's especially infuriating because every once in a blue moon a woman shows up over there who found out her boyfriend slept with a shotload of women and all the women over there trip all over themselves to tell her that it's perfectly okay if she can't accept that.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 05:47 AM
55

Fuck, that's horrifying. And she's proud of it. All of it. I'd be ashamed of myself and suicidally depressed if I had messed my life up that badly, but she's just all, "Well it made me the strong independent woman I am today." Fuck. I'm ready for my homosexual pill now, Big Pharma.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 02:28 PM
157

I know this guy helped bring this shit on himself, but goddamn if his story doesn't tickle a murderous rage inside me. I mean, I don't care if your sex life is unfulfilling. You have to be one seriously sociopathetic evil piece of shit to do to the mother or father of your children what that bitch is doing to him. She does not give even the slightest of fucks about how much she's killing him. Female solipsism at its finest.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 03:59 PM
2

Cause we're the only subreddit that brigades according to the admins.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 03:31 PM
30

What's funny, too, is r/relationships is normally fanatical to the point of insanity about being honest and putting shit out there. They constantly advise people to talk about problems they're having with people and tell them to have "sit down discussions" with them even when it's completely obvious that it's going to do nothing but make the situation a thousand times worse. But a woman might get told something unflattering about her appearance? Holy shit, look at 'em all line up in lockstep to …
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 03:05 PM
6

Man, I seriously ponder about this sometimes. I mean, women's clothing for decades has just kept getting shorter and more revealing. It seems like the very second something becomes socially acceptable to wear through the media, women flock to wear it (bikinis, yoga pants, low rise jeans, etc.) It honestly wouldn't shock me at all if in a hundred years women just walk around with their tits and vadge straight up hanging out.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 06:31 AM
50

Man, that number thing really pisses them off. All the outrage from the women in the comments about that is just hilarious.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 05:33 AM
-1

Wow. Scrolling through the comments here, it's really depressing there's so many guys here who are apparently full-on blind and claim to doubt that men are portrayed much worse in the media than women. If some of you guys can't even see something that goddamn obvious... Ugh. I'm just going to pretend you're a bunch of feminist concern trolls because otherwise one would have to conclude the MRA movement is hopelessly doomed.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:08 PM
17

And I forgot to mention that my biological father doesn't know that I exist. My mother never even told about her pregnancy. You gonna tell him? For whatever it's worth, I'd want to know if I was him. He basically had a crime committed against him by not being told.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 04:52 PM
6

So much this. You guys ever peruse a dating website? Not only do women blatantly lie about their weight and use deceptive pictures, but all the ones over 30 lie about their age, too. If they say they're 29, they're over 30 (and notice the absurd amount of 29-year-olds on any dating site--they're desperate to be under 30 again). If they say they're 30 or 31, they're mid to late thirties. If they say 37, 38, 39, they're over 40 and probably by a few years (EVERY 40ish woman thinks they look like t…
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 10:32 AM
2

The letter also alleged that Roy, through an intermediary, had initially considered not sharing the conversation if the four participants would promise not to run for student leadership positions in the future. Isn't this straight up illegal? I mean, you can release embarrassing shit about people all day long as long as you obtained it legally, but when you say "do X or I'm releasing Y" it becomes blackmail. Or is that not the case in Canada?
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 11:09 AM
5

dat irony
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 03:50 PM
-2

I wouldn't have banned you for it, but I completely disagree. 50% chance of having your life ruined is shit odds. If you had a magic wand that had a 50% chance of making your life slightly better or ruining your life, would you wave it? Not me. Nobody gets married thinking their partner is a bad one who will screw them over. So, the point of "finding a good one" is moot since everyone who gets married thinks they have. The problem is one of hubris, where people think they're special and going to…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:27 AM
10

While that might be a generally ill-advised thing to do, there's nothing even remotely beta about being a violent hair-triggered asshole. See: every famous murderer and his groupies.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/14 05:50 AM
15

Yeah, I would be shocked if that's all the skeletons in her closet. But even if it is, going on lunch dates with some rando from the gym? How do you want to bet princess would've reacted if that dude had gone on a few lunch dates with some cardio bunny from his gym and then not told her? I'm guessing she wouldn't be calling it "not cheating."
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 07:37 AM
7

Going to lunch does not equal dating unless the guy pays for the lunch, and even then, some people are just generous. It really doesn't make a shit who paid. If you go on several dates with some rando you met at the gym of all places and then hide it from your fiancée, you've pretty clearly crossed the line. Would you seriously, while engaged, go to lunch several times with some random chick you met at the gym without telling your fiancée and not think you were crossing the line? Of course you w…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 07:30 AM
11

Dude. She went on dates with the guy and hid it from her boyfriend.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 07:10 AM
8

She might have just been seeking an orbiter for validation, or the proverbial "dick in a glass case" As far as I'm concerned, that's cheating. At least when you take it as far as going on dates with them. Not as bad as fucking them, but still cheating. Of course, now that the fiance pussed out You keep saying this, and although the guy is clearly a pussy, how did he puss out by not pushing the girl for more answers? She's just going to lie to him unless he had some further proof which he didn't.…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 07:06 AM
14

I agree that the behavior is inappropriate, but you can't call having lunch with an acquaintance full-blown cheating. Can so and am. If it was as innocent as you're making it out to be, she would've told her boyfriend about it at the time. She wouldn't have waited until he dumped her and she thought she somehow got busted for it to start letting the truth trickle out. Contrary to your theory about her being naive, she obviously did know she was doing something wrong or it wouldn't even have occu…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 06:57 AM
26

Who cares if she was or not? In my book, going to a handful of lunch dates with some rando from your gym more than qualifies as cheating.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 06:39 AM
31

According to OP, she didn't actually cheat, she just had lunch, therefore your title is misleading. I have this great real estate opportunity I'd like to run by you. It's this bridge, you see...
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 05:56 AM
35

I agree. And everyone acting like she's not responsible is kind of absurd to me. If I found out some guy had been raped when he was a kid and then went on to cheat on his wife with a bus load of people, I wouldn't say, "Well, clearly he had no choice but to do that because he's sexually fucked up." I'd feel bad for him, but his problems didn't transform him into some kind of helpless baby with no power to resist vagina. But holy shit, a woman has the same thing happen to her and she is magically…
/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 11:47 AM
45

Oh, good. I can put my penis wherever I want. All I have to do is say that I'm a "sex addict". Or does that only apply to women? What's hilarious is that even the hive of white knight scum that is r/relationships hates cheating enough that normally if a woman cheated with multiple people they'd toss their white armor away and condemn her. But this chick slept with such an absurd amount of people that they saw the opportunity to write off her behavior as a mental illness and BOY did they all trip…
/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 11:39 AM
154

That part of the comments really rustles my jimmies. I mean, fine, you think she's mentally ill and a poor soiled dove who didn't know what she was doing? I don't buy that, but whatever. But you're gonna advise a guy who's wife has fucked 25 people behind his back to try and work it out? Are you fucking kidding me? How do you even salvage that? How would you EVER trust someone that did that? The insanity of r/relationships knows no bounds.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 09:46 AM
114

I don't know, man. Maybe I'm just an extra large asshole, but I've known soooooo many women that have an overblown (or outright bullshit) rape story that they keep primed and ready in their minds as an all-purpose excuse for things they do. I may be wrong, but all that talk from her just sounds like hamstering to me.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 09:21 AM
16

but the top comment on that redditlog made me scream out and tear at my face and hair like nothing ever has before. Heh, you must've missed a few weeks ago when the guy whose girlfriend wouldn't even give him a blowjob found a gangbang tape and r/relationships tore the guy to shreds for being mad. Or the guy right before that whose wife admitted she spent seven years fucking the family dog and r/sex told the husband he needed to get counselling.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 02:51 PM
8

Yeah, I wasn't calling comforting your girlfriend in general blue pill. But that specific one? After he'd already put up with her antics for hours and let it ruin their New Year's Eve? Then he goes on to comfort her for five more hours? Ehhhh... I feel comfortable calling that blue pill behavior. At that point, he's just enabling her.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 09:36 AM
5

Eh, you may be right. I can see some of both and to be honest I waffled on tagging it red or blue pill. I settled mainly on blue because of the overwhelming blue pill response he got for what he did.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 08:37 AM
11

TLDR: Change the fucking flair. The guy is redpill and this should be a redpill example. Respectfully, I disagree. He doesn't sound blue as a smurf or anything, but holding her for five hours while she bawls her eyes out and ruins New Year's Eve? That doesn't exactly strike me as red pill behavior.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 07:49 AM
-1

Good for you.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 09:08 AM
14

So, even when he's willing to do what she wants, that's not good enough either? You guys are ridiculous.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 09:07 AM
11

Considering you were one of the boneheads trying to make the argument that the guy meant "I will dump you if you get pregnant" in the other thread, I don't think I'd put a lot of stock in what you consider normal adult life.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 08:30 AM
1

Read the new link I posted in r/mensrights. The guy updated and clarified that he specifically told his wife that he would not leave her if she became accidentally pregnant and even said he would raise it with her if she couldn't abort it. So, like I said, you're wrong and now you have proof. Anyone with a lick of common sense could understand that, "Kids are a dealbreaker and if you want them we should break up" doesn't mean "If you ever get pregnant I will dump your sorry ass." Apparently you'…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 06:42 AM
13

I agree. I also think it's possible that she intended to get knocked up and then lost her nerve each time and got an abortion. It would explain why she insisted he didn't get a vasectomy, too. But hell, who knows what the doctor told her about her fertility or if she even really had abortions. Someone who's crazy enough to lie about being infertile for years and hide three abortions is capable of anything. She may have made up the entire abortion shit just to guilt this guy into giving her a bab…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 06:38 AM
29

Read the comments over in the r/relationships thread if you really want to get good and mad. Even with the guy clarifying things with what I quoted above, about the half the comments are still bashing and blaming him. r/relationships is a fucking shithole.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 05:22 AM
2

Read the update I just posted in r/mensrights. You were dead wrong. As anyone with the slightest bit of common sense could see.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 05:00 AM
2

Reread it a third time, then, because apparently you really need glasses. The adoption thing is right there and was from the start.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:20 AM
2

Who knows? Probably he would've wanted to get an abortion if an accidental pregnancy. The point, which seems to keep eluding you, is that "If you want kids someday, we should break up" is not a fucking statement about what you're going to do in case of an accidental pregnancy. It's just not. And you guys are seemingly intentionally misrepresenting it to try and make it so.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:18 AM
2

Yes. The relationship ends. Right then. Because she wants kids someday. Not, "If you get accidentally pregnant someday anyway, I will totally dump your ass." You guys have to be intentionally misrepresenting his statement, because I refuse to believe you're all this goddamn stupid that you can't see that.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:16 AM
1

There's not a worse thing you can say to a woman than 'Get pregnant and I'll leave.' He should feel guilty for even saying these words. Man, I was totally with you until this part. The guy never said anything of the sort. Never even so much as implied it. Why do you guys keep straight making that shit up? "If you want kids someday, we should break up" is not "If you get accidentally pregnant someday, I will leave you." Goddamn, people.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:13 AM
7

He told her that he would divorce her if she got pregnant You either didn't read the thread at all or you're a goddamn liar because he said no such thing. "If you want kids someday, we need to break up," is not even in the same universe as, "If you ever get accidentally pregnant I am going to dump your sorry ass." Use your fucking head.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 07:07 PM
3

and he would end the relationship if they happened No, that is not what he fucking said. At all.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 07:02 PM
5

Yeah. I think the guy has a right to be righteously furious but I also think he shouldn't show that to a woman who just went through an abortion. That strikes me as big time overkill. But they (and sadly many in this thread) don't even think he's entitled to his silent anger. As if you can just turn off your anger by logic. It's funny, too, cause all of them expect the man to understand that the woman is in emotional pain that she cannot control. But the man and his anger? He must turn it off. J…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:39 PM
4

I dont know why you're adding retroactive continuity. Isn't modifying the story after the fact one of the signs of a bad story. Reread the edit. The adoption thing was in there the first time you read it. It's not my fault you forgot your ADHD meds this morning. Your story is indeed close enough, neither Marie nor Dennis are worthy of praise Oh I can't wait to hear this. Please, oh please, tell me exactly in what way Marie deserves blame and is not "praise worthy?" Because from where I sit it lo…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:35 PM
3

Your example regarding Dan and Marie is completely backwards and inherently flawed. Nope and I'll counter your incorrect points below. In the original story, from which this thread stems, there is no lie until the first abortion is concealed Likewise, there is no lie until Dennis discovers his cancer has made him sterile two years into the marriage. In your story, the woman's expectation to have children is never satisfied whereas in the real story the man's expectations to not have children are…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:15 PM
15

However, his reproductive rights weren't violated in any way. In what insane universe is not telling someone that they fathered children three times not a violation of their reproductive rights? Goddamn.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:05 PM
4

You just gave me a great idea. Check the incoming third edit in a minute.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:42 PM
19

Societal gynocentrism is a men's rights issue. Especially in a case like this where it leads to a man who has been severely betrayed and had his reproductive rights monkeyed with being told by dozens of misguided people that he's somehow in the wrong and that he should endure it and that he's not even entitled to his fucking feelings. Yes, by God, this IS a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:18 PM
10

Lying about being sterile and having three abortions behind his back without even asking if that was what he wanted is your idea of respecting him? There's something seriously wrong with you.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 03:27 PM
10

Nope. Respecting his right to choose would've been telling him, "I know we didn't want children but shit happens and we done fucked up and conceived. Do you want to abort?" Not wanting to have children does not strictly imply you would be in favor of abortion in the case of a pregnancy. Stop acting like it does. And even if he had, he should have been told. Period. Not telling him is indefensible.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 03:04 PM
8

Sounds like the woman went to great and deliberate lengths, that included keeping secrets to respect his right to chose not to be a father. Yes, she lied, for no reason. She had no reason to think this guy would dump her. "I don't want kids" doesn't mean "I will dump you if you get accidentally pregnant through no fault of your own." Thinking it does is insane. She may have assumed he would've wanted to have an abortion. Fine. Even if she was right, you tell your fucking husband. What the fuck i…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 02:13 PM
9

He didn't want to be a father though, seems the OP made it clear in those comments he never wanted to be. Many, many people who don't want to have children wouldn't necessarily be in favor of abortion in the case of an accidental pregnancy. Others would. Thats why you tell your husband you're pregnant before you have an abortion.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 02:00 PM
31

Read some of the comments here in the r/mensrights thread. There are actually several of our supposed fellow MRAs arguing that very insane point. It's pretty disheartening. We already have none of the reproductive rights we ought to have. And yet some of our own in here are arguing that it's okay to not even be told? No wonder we're fucked.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 01:56 PM
15

The guy in the OP seems pretty shitty. Because he has the audacity to think he should be fucking told when he's fathered children? What an asshole.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 01:52 PM
13

I don't get why everyone is mad Because not being told when you've become a father three times is abhorrent. Why are you even on r/mensrights if you have so little support of men's reproductive rights that you think being told and not lied to is too much to ask? Besides that, he never said to this woman that he would leave her if she got pregnant. She had no reason to lie. She should've told him and they could've dealt with it.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 01:51 PM
10

You see to not be realizing that as the story goes that he stipulated that the relationship was over if she wanted children, No, that's your twisted interpretation of it. He simply told her he didn't want children and she should find someone else if she wanted them. That does not in any way, shape or form translate to: If you ever get accidentally pregnant you better abort immediately or I will dump your ass. so instead of bringing up the pregnancy, which she would have thought was a 1 a million…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 01:48 PM
14

So it doesn't necessarily mean she lied about that. She lied once she got pregnant the first time, found out she wasn't sterile, and then didn't bother to tell him for another three years. As far as the abortions, given his deal breaker about kids she probably fear he would leave her if he found out she got pregnant. So, just because he didn't want to have children and rightly informed her of this while dating, that means he's scumbag who would leave his wife if she accidentally got pregnant. Th…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 01:43 PM
12

He wanted to get a vasectomy. She pressured him not to do it.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 01:20 PM
16

According the story she didn't lie about being sterile. Wrong. As soon as she got pregnant the first time two years into their marriage, she found out she wasn't sterile and began lying about it. These were not children, and he didn't want them to develop into children. That's pure speculation on your part. Many people who don't want children aren't necessarily in favor of aborting them once they're already conceived. But fuck thinking someone should at least be told before they're aborted, righ…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 01:01 PM
24

I don't know why guys even ask for advice over there with it being so biased. The guy is always wrong.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 09:02 AM
20

I'm not saying the guy should be angry with her or anything I'd say he should. Damn mad, in fact. I think he has every right to be. I wouldn't say it's necessarily the time to voice that feeling, though, and he definitely shouldn't go nova on someone who just had abortion. But apparently everyone in that thread can't make the distinction between "entitled to be angry" and "scream and yell at your wife."
/r/MensRights31/12/13 07:38 AM
16

Yeah, they've really unleashed the Misogyny Bloodhounds over there to try and stir up a scent.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 07:27 AM
2

Or, you know, you get herpes. 1 in 6 people have it and condoms only cut the risk by 20%. You can't dodge the bullet of statistical probability forever.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 10:48 PM
99

Now tell her about the hot chick you fucked last night whose perfect tits make you come so hard. Do it.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 05:27 PM
1

If you think that one example is what led me to the conclusion that white, Western women are the most pampered and privileged class of animal to ever walk the Earth, well, you're wrong.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 04:53 AM
3

Of course men sometimes cry when they've been grievously injured and no, I've been lucky enough to never witness that at any jobs I worked. But even those rare occurrences of "injury tears" do almost nothing to balance the scales of how much women cry versus how much men cry.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 07:34 AM
11

What stands out for me is that, as a man, I think most of us would not be overly surprised if we pulled what she did and got punched in the face for it. I'm not saying that's the appropriate reaction to someone purposely being an asshole and bumping your leg to wake you up or that it's right, but if I did that and the guy punched me in the nose, would anyone really have any sympathy for me after egging the guy on that way? I wouldn't if another guy did it. Yet, she feels completely entitled to a…
/r/MensRights25/12/13 06:01 AM
5

You're wasting your time. It's become apparent to me that most of the posters in this sub honestly believe that men and women are exactly the same except for the plumbing. Ever worked in an office full of women? Hardly a day goes by that one doesn't shed tears about something. In all the factory jobs I've had, I've yet to see a man cry unless someone died. But you know, that's not evidence of any inherent difference between men and women. That's just because men get told not to cry as little boy…
/r/MensRights25/12/13 05:53 AM
6

I agree. Although technically the police are following lawful orders when they round up "deadbeats," how could anybody do that for a living and look themselves in the mirror? Arresting some guy for being delinquent on $81 bucks? Arresting all these dads knowing how biased the family court is? And don't get me started on drug laws. Actively helping to ruin people's lives over a little marijuana? No, if you're a police officer with the way things are right now, you really should be looked down upo…
/r/MensRights25/12/13 05:37 AM
0

So Liz is a "lazy shit" as well then, right? Otherwise you're being a giant hypocrite.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 03:05 PM
0

Maybe you should've actually read it. He takes her out twice a month, and that's not counting shit like family dinners either. And it doesn't matter if it's "sporting events" versus "movies, walks, bowling, etc." It's "shit he hates doing" compared to "shit she hates doing."
/r/MensRights24/12/13 03:04 PM
2

I definitely suspect there's more to that honeymoon story about the video games than she told us.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 12:41 PM
4

She should be But she isn't and that's the entire fucking point of this thread. It should be for both or none. A man should not have to earn the right to marry his fiancée through acts of fucking fealty. That's not a partner. That's a subservient.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:11 AM
2

Good on you. You're not a hypocrite then. The OP in the story, however, wanted her fancy proposal or she possibly doesn't want to marry and millions of women feel just like her. There is nothing right, fair, or equal about that. And it's offensive.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:09 AM
3

Or maybe there shouldn't be this expectation solely on men when it comes to starting a lifelong marriage with a supposedly equal partner.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:06 AM
2

So? He may one day ask her to bear his child or shave her legs or do any number of things he wouldn't reciprocate. Yes, and if it's something he's capable but unwilling of doing for her, then she has every right to be hurt, offended, and refuse to do it. But you don't think fair is fair when it comes to proposing. He should "man up" and propose and tough titties if he doesn't like it, right? If you don't want to propose, that's fine. But don't expect to marry. Hmmm, that was awfully close to som…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:04 AM
2

You don't toss someone a bag and ask them if they'll be with you forever. It's not slander. He didn't take any of OPs feelings into account. If a woman did that to a man, it would be bad too. How are you not seeing this? Your argument there was basically "The man shouldn't simply toss a bag on a table and ask her. He should ask her in a romantic and heartfelt way." Then you go on to claim it would be bad if a woman did this, too. Except women do do this, essentially. Constantly. They bring up ma…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:58 AM
3

If I never did anything to maintaom my relationship with my boyfriend and belittled his thoughts, feelimgs, and desires, it would not be fair for me to expect a happy relationship from him. I think it's telling that you think someone refusing to bow to their partner's and society's demand to do something fancy for them that that partner is not required to do back before they will be granted marriage is equivalent to belittling someone and neglecting their relationship. Your entitlement is showin…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:52 AM
0

If he isn't willing to ask his partner to marry him in the way he knows she would like, Why isn't she expected to ask him to marry her in a way she knows he would like? This is not a rhetorical question. Answer it.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:48 AM
3

Maybe he decided it was offensive that he had to ask his supposedly equal partner for permission to get married, regardless of how sentimental she is. It's entirely reasonable to be offended by that. And you say you'd be hurt if your boyfriend proposed this way. Why should your boyfriend not be hurt that you didn't propose that way first? You can like this tradition all you want. But don't act like it's not a serious breach of gender equality, because it is. And people have every right to be off…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:32 AM
4

Again, why is a man expected to do this and not a woman? Women almost never propose. Why are they not considered uncaring for not doing so, yet you casually slander a man for not doing? You're not seeing the obvious inequality here and I'm not sure why.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:28 AM
3

A formal proposal is not the same as simply asking someone and you know. Simply asking someone is what the guy in the story did.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:26 AM
2

I don't even understand what are you trying to say here. One party should actually ask if the other wants to get married, that is how it works. I don't think it is legal to get married without one party wanting to get married. Right. Just asking is fine. As in, "Hey, would you like to get married?" Which is more or less what this guy did and he got excoriated for it. What you're suggesting is it's acceptable that the onus is on a man to make a formal proposal, essentially a ceremonial asking of …
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:24 AM
4

From reading that post, I seriously doubt that would've gone over with her. She's ready to end the relationship over this. And it isn't just the ring. Maybe he was (rightly) put off by the idea that he has to propose at all and how offensive that is, that he's supposed to ask for permission to marry her.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:17 AM
2

I don't even want an engagement ring, but I would be quite unamused and hurt if my SO proposed to me this way All due respect, that shows a sense of entitlement on your part. Nobody should have to do a big showy production of asking their partner to marry them. If they do? That's nice, but it shouldn't be expected. There shouldn't be hurt feelings if they don't. That's entitlement. That's not equality. Hell, they shouldn't have to ask at all. That just shows subservience and an imbalance. In a f…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:12 AM
-1

Explain to me why a man should have to propose at all? Explain to me why in a supposedly equal relationship one party should have to ask and be GRANTED PERMISSION for marriage from the other? That's not the actions of partners. That's the actions of someone subservient to another.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:37 AM
2

Edited it to add.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/13 04:40 PM
8

I'm on my phone or I'd link it (someone else feel free, assuming they didn't delete it). The gist of it was, some guy in r/sex posted that his wife admitted to him that, starting around puberty, she let their family dog fuck her for seven years and that she enjoyed it immensely. The guy was understandably disturbed. r/sex threw on their white armor and practically fell all over themselves defending this nutty bitch. They said it was "youthful experimentation," that he should support her for havi…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/13 04:28 PM
1

I might get downvoted for saying this (especially with the recent influx of politically correct newcomers), but... I'd never say ADHD didn't exist. I'm sure there really are some people in the world with a weird-wired brain that makes then unable to focus. However, I'd feel fully comfortable saying that 99.99% of the people who supposedly have ADHD (and every person in this thread who claims to) don't actually have it.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/13 11:26 AM
22

Goddamn, that comment section rustled my jimmies so hard, I think it might've blown them clean off. I'm all taint down there now. Between those sick fucks in r/sex saying a chick fucking her dog for years is A-OK, and this, I'm just about convinced the sky's the limit when it comes to white knighting on Reddit. Gangbangs, dog-fucking, etc. No, no, boys, don't you see? She chose to be with you and that's all in the past. Aren't you lucky? What you need is counseling, to try and understand why you…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/13 09:52 AM
26

No, dude, it's Reddit. I'm reasonably sure I could grab 20 people off the street and they'd all disagree with Reddit and agree that dog-fucking is grounds for divorce.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/13 07:05 AM
14

She was at your place when they served her? Did you witness any of it? Details!
/r/MensRights04/12/13 08:20 AM
4

TBH if you were to wear a condom, you would be protected from any of that promiscuous person's diseases anyway. This knowledge-gap is where slut-shaming attitudes come from Condoms only reduce your risk of catching genital herpes by 30%. 1 in 6 people have genital herpes. Do the math. Or I'll do it for you: it means even if you use condoms, for about every ten people you sleep with, that tenth person will expose you to it. This is straight from the CDC website before you go crying for source, to…
/r/MensRights28/11/13 09:04 PM
12

Ehem. How exactly is it a false rape accusation if you did not attain consent? Are you fucking kidding me? You're seriously one of those everything-is-rape, you-must-get-notarized-consent-in-triplicate feminists? Why are you even here? This will be my last response to you now that I know you're a troll. You claim to be surprised about women having this "weird shame around sex", and guess that maybe other women cause it, but in your very first line you shame and reject the idea of a woman who wan…
/r/MensRights28/11/13 12:47 PM
9

"socially conditioned shame toward sex" -which obviously you have NO part in reinforcing at all :rolls eyes: I don't believe I do. And if you'll recall there was a study just posted in the Times (I think) that was making the rounds of Reddit the last week or so that said that women are primarily responsible for slut shaming.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 12:40 PM
15

You're treating this like women don't want to get laid just as much as you. No, I'm not (that's your strawman) and of course they do. They just want to pretend like they don't and tell themselves they don't so they don't have to feel the socially conditioned shame toward sex. If you're at the point that you're in position to have sex, odds are there's not much you can say to deter her. I usually say something like "You okay doing this?" or "Do you want to do this?" It's quick, you don't make a b…
/r/MensRights28/11/13 10:56 AM
26

The problem is, you'd never get laid again if you actually did this (except maybe from some uber-promiscuous nymphomaniac and--sorry--but no thank you). We're not supposed to talk about this because the PC police want us to pretend men and women are exactly the same, but we're not. And women have this weird shame around sex (and I don't care to argue about the reasons but I firmly believe it's mostly other women that cause them to feel this way). As a result, the worst thing you can do as a man …
/r/MensRights28/11/13 07:25 AM
24

This guy's situation is absolutely a men's rights issue and you're blind if you can't figure out why.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 07:08 AM
7

Exactly. And in the case we're actually talking about, a better analogy would be Bob literally just handing Mike a beer later on, Mike accepting it and drinking, then calling the cops.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:26 PM
22

No, it's not a tough call. Someone trying again to initiate sex is not forcing someone to have sex. That goes doubly when that person has every reason to think the situation has changed. If I tell someone I hate that I don't want to shake their hand, then we make up and they try to shake my hand again and I begrudgingly let them, does that mean they forced me to shake their hand? Of course not. Unless you want to make the argument that women aren't responsible for their own decisions. You know, …
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:13 PM
13

Dude, respectfully, that's horseshit. You're infantilizing this girl in a very sexist way. The trauma in her past doesn't render her a mental invalid incapable of saying no or voicing her objections to sex. He didn't force sex on her. He attempted and she allowed. Just like she, I'm assuming, attempted to give him oral sex without asking for verbal consent and he allowed it to happen. They both agreed there would be no sex, yet she broke the agreement and you aren't calling her a rapist. But she…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:37 PM
8

The only thing that's "clearly indicative" of is that your math department had an affirmative action style hiring policy and ignored qualifications.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:39 AM
1

Because they can.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 10:26 AM
20

This is a men's rights issue and don't any of you dare say otherwise. Imagine if a man did what this psychotic woman did. Imagine it. Imagine a single mother goes out with a guy twice, them politely lets him down. Imagine this guy then sends her abusive text messages, posts them on the Internet for all the world to see, and sends her naked pictures to her employer to humiliate her and try to get her fired. That guy would be in handcuffs like he deserves, not laughing it up on the Internet like t…
/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:36 AM
1

I agree. I didn't think his "mutant" position was offensive--just stupid and nonsensical. His overreaction to criticism on Twitter was ridiculous too, though. He seems awfully determined to react as if he actually is a minority with an unassailable argument that only bigots could disagree with. Stupid.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 10:32 AM
3

Psychology major, too. Just think, fellas. This woman will be molding people's minds someday.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 10:16 AM
3

I'm really disappointed with the (supposed) guys in this thread that are skeptical this is an actual thing. It absolutely is. Maybe some of you guys that haven't experienced this are shorter/smaller guys or something and aren't seen as quite as threatening? I don't know. (Although I know some big guy is going to chime in and say otherwise just to be contrarian.) Me? I'm a big guy over six feet tall. I am reasonably good looking and clean cut. Even with that, I experience this all the time. Women…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 03:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter