TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TAPriceCTR Archive

View 8 posts and 2,215 comments by TAPriceCTR on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,215 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

that's the only way I know to identify the person/event. Perhaps I would be more accommodating or less insulting if he apologized but he later stood by his temper tantrum in a public interview so he is forever named MMTS in my mind. though, I must confess, I am surprised youtube hasn't pulled the videos identifying him as such.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 04:27 AM
11

I agree with Hannah Wallen (or was it Allison Temin?). it's not a zero sum game, it's a negative sum game. it's not that men compete for the same pool of resources if it's acknowledged to affect both sexes, it is that the issue is allocated LESS attention if men are included.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 04:24 AM
26

I use manosphere unironically. it encompasses a wide range of groups that are possibly even more disparate than the denominations of feminism. MGTOW, have little do to with Incels each who may or may not be MRAs and all have philosophically almost to nothing to do with PUAs. Just about the only complete overlap is that Intactivists are all MRAs.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 04:09 AM
31

if you want to know how institutionalized hatred is for one group over another, see which groups slurs are taken more seriously. the group for whom equivalent slurs are given no weight is the group that society hates. ​ example: Call a man a "dick"? meh, that was rude but he probably deserved it. call a woman a "cunt"... all hell breaks loose and if you did it on the job you're definitely fired. say "men are dogs", meh, it's no big deal. call a single woman (let alone all) a bitch (literally "fe…
/r/MensRights23/10/22 04:01 AM
0

Nor do Incels. Far more babies (post birth) are killed by mothers than are people killed by Incels. Let's me guess, "but mom life is so hard"
/r/MensRights22/10/22 02:34 PM
1

Sure there is. It just isn't anywhere near as common as feminists say it is. I hear example of toxic masculinity is when Zoe tur threatened Ben Shapiro. Macho ma'am tranny savage is another great example of it. Meanwhile, by perpetrating proxy violence and social aggression Amber Heard is a great example of toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 03:27 AM
13

You're mad that she's putting her child before herself? That sucks to lose her but at least he had this long with a woman who knows how to be unselfish. Hopefully if he remarried he chooses just as wisely next time. Early in my marriage my wife made me listen to "the promise of stardust". She has made it clear that at no point am I (in event of her incapacitation) to medically save her over any child she is carrying.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 11:37 PM
12

You can't collect victimhood points until you renounce your penis
/r/MensRights21/10/22 11:31 PM
2

Come back with your main. I don't talk to sock puppets.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 10:58 PM
1

Feminists: "Yeah, but it was a MAN who did it". Victim blaming over an immutable characteristic is FAR WORSE than "victim blaming" over stupid decision making.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 04:00 PM
1

And an MRA is just someone who supports rights for men. That's it. Turn off the mainstream media that suckle at the feminist teat which declares that that very same mainstream media which grovels before feminism "hates women".
/r/MensRights21/10/22 03:20 PM
3

Scientists declare the googolplex a useless number because it exceedes the number of particles in the known universe. It's not so useless, it is the starting point for counting feminist hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 03:16 PM
2

I constantly point out how similar (but not as severe) the general social rejection suffered by land whales is to that of Incels. I wonder how much life would improve if women could show Incels 1/2 the compassion they demand everyone show land whales.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 03:07 PM
2

Yes. That's exactly what I am saying.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 04:13 AM
1

Someone assigning responsibility of women's choices to men? I've NEVER seen that before. 🤥
/r/MensRights21/10/22 02:33 AM
1

No. You spoke in present participle... it needs to be past tense.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 11:08 PM
6

Sure, just like barefoot driving violates the law.... (here's a hint. It doesn't.)
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:40 PM
6

Some busy body trying to pretend their disgust for other people's life choices is quantifiably different than other judgemental pricks disgust for other people's life choices.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:38 PM
1

You forgot the /s
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:28 PM
1

I've been called a pedophile 4 times because at age 32 I married a 19 year old. 10 years later she's carrying my 4th child so people who use the label like that are just watering it down (even more than the law already has since by definition is specifically PREPUBESCENT, not just legal minors) and can kiss my ass.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:16 PM
2

Chill. It's not some snarkey individuals, it's established! It is "institutional". https://www.worldtoiletday.info/ https://www.internationalmensday.info/
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:57 PM
1

Yes, you thought correct. Note the edit
/r/MensRights20/10/22 11:18 AM
1

If I was in search of a therapist, I would see the prim reaper long before the average male who made it through the feminist indoctrination of any "social science" department.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 12:14 AM
4

it's more a case of they stop maturing earlier than boys
/r/MensRights19/10/22 10:35 PM
5

no, I trusted myself to have correctly set it on the calendar but I apparently did it wrong. checking the default calendar wouldn't help because it is not recognized by calendar makers.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 09:57 PM
1

They're like those people who think everyone who politically disagrees with them are making the topic political. Or the religious people who think their religiousness isn't religiousness
/r/MensRights19/10/22 08:18 PM
5

Damn it, you're right. I set the reminder in my phone wrong.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 03:58 PM
2

And pretend that conservatives don't support appropriate charges against everyone who got violent.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 03:57 PM
2

The 2020 riots that killed dozens of people, set up a 6 block "autonomous zone" in Seattle (that the mayor said could be "a summer of love"), and did billions in damage.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 03:37 PM
1

No, but the been diagram nearly concentric
/r/MensRights19/10/22 02:47 PM
1

Kinda like the summer of love. "93% of the protests were peaceful" (by leftist reporting) "so it was actually pretty good". Meanwhile 99.7% of arrests are peaceful and the remaining 0.3% include both unjustified force and JUSTIFIED. "CoPs aRe hUnTiNg bLaCk mEn" The denominations of the left don't have standards or scientific process. They only have tribal post hoc excuses.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 02:44 PM
4

Camille Paglia; If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts Me: if men weren't trying to impress/care-for women, we would have probably be living in midieval level housing.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 02:27 PM
33

Hell no. Do you have any idea how long it would take us to fix the fallout? Neither worth the gratitude it SHOULD generate nor would we receive it. We would be blamed for it taking to long to clean up.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 02:20 PM
1

My goodness you are thicker than Jupiter. The point is, the number of people who can sleep or receive a massage while earning money is virtually zero, the opposite is more true for "while pregnant" meaning pregnancy occupies your body LESS COMPLETELY than employment. THUS if forcing a woman to finish a pregnancy she chose to risk is violating bodily autonomy, then forcing a man to pay child support for a pregnancy he chose to risk is a more complete violation of bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 03:34 PM
3

Mostly because homophobe is used with no more accuracy than misogynist.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 03:13 PM
4

Never trust anyone who thinks "af" is a usable adjective. But You do look like Jerry Seinfeld and Bob Sagat had a son.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 11:55 AM
1

It's really not. If you get really desperate however, just know that women are generally more attracted to older men. I consider myself to have been an incel growing up but at age 32 married a 19 year old. 10 years later she's about to give birth to our 4th child. Sure other people will condemn you as a cradle robber, but that's generally jealousy and pettiness.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 11:53 AM
1

Mens Rights is not about fighting oppression. it is about seeing reality for what it is. Just because men have it worse (my opinion, certainly debatable, but not worth debating) doesn't make it oppression. As Yeomi Park taught us, people who are oppressed, do not have a word for it. open rejection of feminism, and actively seeking to overcome lies that feminism has brainwashed society with (eg; 1/4 college rape myth, wage gap myth, lots of rewriting of history) your edit seems like a pretty good…
/r/MensRights17/10/22 01:22 AM
1

in a world where people believed jussie smolette and condemned nick sandman, I am happy to have such fools think ill of me.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 08:49 AM
1

oh, you sure nailed me. your perceptions of me are EXACTLY as accurate as your perceptions of the world around you. I voted AGAINST trump in '16. I hated trump before hating trump was cool. but unlike you bigots, I actually keep my eyes open and don't just drink the koolaid the proven liars in mainstream media serve. yeah, he was stupid for not firing dr anthony the science fauchi, he made several mistakes. but the world was more peaceful (except for your summer of love) and the economy was stro…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 08:20 AM
3

Women are inherently less committed (men more prone to avoiding commitment, but when they commit, they are more likely to stick to it) this is not only in marriage, but in other interpersonal and business relationships and even community and national identity. feminism creates a positive feedback loop with this making them no longer even think commitment is a virtue. the behaviors feminists laud in women are psychopathy when men act in accordance with them. women are told "find your happy" while…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 04:19 AM
3

child support is often based on the income POTENTIAL of the "non-involved" parent. Judges are eager to raise men's child support orders at any excuse, but they ... and even if they were instantaneously responsive to changes in his income, 25% of 40 hours a week (pretending men generally work that little) for 18 years is >9000 hours of his body (and mind) 100% dedicated to providing for the child (women continue to live their lives during most of the <7000 hours that is pregnancy) he had absolute…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 03:50 AM
5

I sacrifice my body for every penny that could be hypothetically taken in child support. Karen Straughn speaks of a man who is maimed and exhausted from a job his body can no longer handle and he can't quit because child support leaves no room for him to accept a lower paying safe job. State mandated child support is VERY MUCH a matter of bodily autonomy. Slaves don't have bodily autonomy... men don't have bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 02:00 AM
1

Trunp is definitely not an MRA but: Getting Kim Jong-Un to calm the hell down. Signing the Abraham accords. Keeping Russia from even trying to expand. Baning critical race theory from government Planning pulling out of Afghanistan (that Biden would botch worse than a drunken 5 year old) Allowing fuel drilling to expand lowering gas prices You don't think these things are even SLIGHTLY better for men? We're on the verge of WWIII and with the current castrated military recruitment ads we're defini…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 01:53 AM
2

Now. Either parenthood is a choice or it is not. Men and women are the same issue.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 01:39 AM
1

No, there is no biological way that men are stuck with paternity... it takes social constructs to extract resources from fathers against their will.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 01:31 AM
1

One doesn't have to be a "right wing fundamentalist" to believe in giving the unborn some consideration. And yeah, if I have to choose between "no fetucide ever" (which no one in power promotes) and "convenience fetucide even in the 9th month" (which is ALREADY LEGAL IN 7 STATES), I'll side with the former. So yeah, keep telling us we have to pick one extreme or the other. See where that gets you.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 01:27 AM
3

Voluntary paternal surrender. Waving all parental rights to escape all parental responsibility... the way fetucide does for women.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 01:20 AM
4

No. You're reading it VERY wrong. "It needs to be UNused equally " meaning "consentual sex with a minor is sexual misconduct regardless of which sex is involved in which role". Rape is sex against the victims will regardless of which sex is involved in which role. I don't understand how you read a sexist double standard into anything I said.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 07:15 PM
2

I understand why people are upset and you want the misnomer to be used equally, but it should be UNused equally instead. It is an insult to victims of actual rape (when a person's choice to NOT have sex is denied them) to apply that term when the "victim's" will was TO have sex and we as a society seem it unacceptable. The adults my relative started seeking out at age 12 deserved jail time for contributing to the delinquency of a minor and sexual misconduct, but it wasn't rape. Even if you're st…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 03:11 PM
0

Because society are hypocrites who don't listen to me.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 02:27 PM
11

As a pro lifer, I disagree. I believe people are responsible to provide for the children they conceive (even if they only provide them adoptive parents). But as an egalitarian, as long as elective fetucide is a thing, voluntary paternal surrender should be unquestionable.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 06:25 AM
16

HIV receptors? The body doesn't have HIV receptors. That would indicate or body is designed/evolved to receive HIV rather than HIV being designed/evolved to invade our body.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 10:37 PM
2

agreed. rebellion is no more self determination than blind obedience.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 02:55 AM
1

no. you can MGTOW and have casual flings (unadvisable), but you can't go your own way WITH A PARTNER. If I ever find myself single again I'll go MGTOW, but as long as I remain married I am not.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 02:53 AM
4

Feminists can handle any level of cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 01:24 AM
16

Because the only way society objects to the draft is if women are subject to it.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 10:38 PM
4

The reserves are supposed to be defensive too. They belong to the state but can be used nationally.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 10:37 PM
23

The only way to end the draft is to subject women to it. As long as only men are being harmed by a social program, no one sees the program as a bad thing.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 10:35 PM
3

The difference between feminists and tradcons is feminists hate men regardless, tradcons respect men who fill their role. And tradcons will grant men rights ALMOST commensurate their responsibilities while feminists give women all rights and men all responsibilities.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 10:34 PM
4

Let them investigate me. They'll find someone so squeaky clean they'll arrest themselves in shame.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 04:44 AM
2

Yeah, but that's the PrIvIlEgEd one.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 06:36 AM
10

My ex wife lied about marital rape to manipulate her cyber boyfriends. I'm convinced the only time she tried seducing me in 6 years of marriage (1 week before running away with #3) was so she could take those lies to the police... glad she did it while I was still pissed at her relapse with #2 so I didn't give her the "evidence". Hard to do a rape kit when you've not had sex in 3 months.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 12:50 AM
2

Damnit Poe
/r/MensRights08/10/22 08:06 PM
3

Conservatism is anti divorce
/r/MensRights08/10/22 01:53 PM
3

Feminists gave women default custody in divorce. Until protofeminist Caroline Norton wrote the tender years doctrine men had default custody. Shortly after giving women custody child support was invented because responsibility is too much for women.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 01:51 PM
6

Pickme
/r/MensRights08/10/22 01:46 PM
3

It is a red flag when woman who uses the word queen without referring to a monarchy or drag show
/r/MensRights08/10/22 01:45 PM
6

"You're comparing apples and oranges" things must be different to be compared, otherwise they'd be the same thing. Apples and oranges are very comparable, especially when it comes to the fact that they are the next generation. If you can't compare them then you're not competent to have your opinion considered on the matter.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 01:41 PM
2

If have no problem trading duties with my wife... and having been a single father for 3 years, my confidence in that is well founded.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 01:37 PM
17

It is so sad that we need that "/s" to be confident you're not one of the feminist missionaries who come here speaking sincerely.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 01:31 PM
1

What's with all the redaction?
/r/MensRights08/10/22 01:25 PM
10

it may be what the feminists mean when they use the term, but that is just their bigotry. incels don't even have to be virgins. celibacy is a present state, not a history. incels want a relationship and can't get one. the closest women get to that level of social rejection is landwhales, but even they are far from the pariahs that "creepy" men are.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 01:42 AM
10

involuntary celibate. if incels considered rape an option then it would not be possible for celibacy to be "involuntary". feminists can't help but be impossibly wrong.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 01:32 AM
1

But, you know, bullshit doesn't count when it disproves their bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:54 AM
3

Since I can't afford to give dollars a often as I have the opportunity I have a rule to not give cash. What i CAN afford and they need is Costco water bottles. Costs me pennies and saves them dollars at the convenience store. I always have bottles on hand and give whenever possible.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 12:33 AM
1

asking questions. then ask about how their answers to those questions mesh with others. feminism can't help but contradict itself, especially now that they can't even define the word woman. just know, don't get cocky, they have thousands of academic departments dedicated to spinning circles of doublethink, so accept that you can't convince them, you are just giving them an opportunity to show the audience how nuts they are, if you lose your cool it'll backfire. even neutrals are gynocentric so y…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 10:36 PM
5

I forgot about him. I knew there was obsession, but I don't recall if it included adults like Lautner. To be clear, there is nothing wrong with anyone finding anyone attractive. It's behavior where problems happen.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:38 PM
2

Camille Paglia "If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts." Along a similar vane, I imagine the construction of houses would be on par with a midieval blacksmith shop or barn if males were not trying to impress females.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:23 PM
15

Don't forget 16 year old Taylor Lautner. Humans are attracted to youth. It's in our DNA (men more than women... but it's both). The sooner we accept this the sooner we can more effectively protect children because after the fact nuking people does nothing but drive lust into the shadows where everything gets more dangerous. I have a friend who, as we were catching up in her 30s, broke down crying not over what the man "did to her" but over a sense of guilt for what her parents and the law did to…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:54 PM
25

police officer Nicholas Reardon nearly lost his freedom for stopping a stabbing mid lunge. So, no, I don't blame anyone for being a "pussy".
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:49 PM
78

Remember how police officer Nicholas Reardon nearly lost his freedom? He saved a black girl from being stabbed.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:47 PM
4

A dude from high school shared (and insisted it was true) a vid declaring "women don't lie about rape".... I told him he should stop talking to me because my (at that time, soon to be ex) wife told her cyber boyfriends stories of marital rape and if women don't lie about rape that must mean I'm guilty. Thankfully, being a sexless marriage, it had been far too long and thus a rape kit would simply confirm sex didn't occur so she never took her lies to the cops.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:58 AM
4

ROFLMBO! man speaks about married men working and the suicide bot gets triggered. did the bot become self aware and realize men are working themselves to death?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:38 AM
1

work harder longer hours.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:34 AM
4

look to the grass eaters of japan. when men give up impressing women they can live for MUCH less.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:33 AM
12

the wage gap is a myth. the earnings gap is real.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:31 AM
3

why wouldn't they love having more equality than men?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:28 AM
3

I used to be very gynocentric but by the time I learned the term feminist, I already knew the term egalitarian and was developing in that direction. I saw feminist bias before trusting the feminist claims so no, I've never considered myself a feminist. Christie o misty introduced me to dropping gynocentrism from my egalitarianism... that there were some things that men in particular suffer. I'd love to cease to be an MRA but until the mission of equality is accomplished, I will continue to count…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:29 PM
1

No, I get called one for other non sequitur reasons. Despite my wife carrying my 4th child I don't bother arguing against their ad hominem attacks as they don't matter. I now regularly just embrace the label "misoistaphobe" and they no longer have anything to say because after you disarm them of baseless insults, they have nothing.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 10:14 PM
1

No one benefits hiding from truth. My sons mental value will increase when he learns to value it himself.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 09:56 PM
-1

No, I'll call it weaponized incompetence regardless.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 09:12 PM
0

Lots of people cease to develop personality wise by 16. I HOPE to get my son to stop this, but there very much ARE people of BOTH sexes who weaponize incompetence.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 09:05 PM
0

Currently 16. Regardless, there are people who do it.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 03:49 PM
5

Or the husband doesn't.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 05:33 AM
0

No, my son does that. He's got no pride in his abilities and pretends to be stupider than he really is.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 04:34 AM
2

in nations where children are your retirement but only men have responsibilities girls will be aborted more... but anywhere else this is not the case. gynocentrism hurts women too.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 03:38 AM
2

why can't we do a poll here? I wanted to find out this community's balance on something and it wouldn't let me do a poll
/r/MensRights01/10/22 05:30 PM
1

when the reality is that "they can't because they're busy solving women's problems."
/r/MensRights01/10/22 05:11 PM
2

feminists' issues are "when a man victimizes a woman, the law makes her prove it before punishing him" men's issues are "when a woman victimizes a man, the law facilitates her violation"
/r/MensRights01/10/22 05:09 PM
2

Wooosh
/r/MensRights01/10/22 03:45 PM
480

You'd think the owner of the hotel would be the one in trouble. I don't expect furniture to collapse on me.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 03:21 PM
0

I'd be impressed. Few people, let alone women, are that self aware. I mean there's still a big step for them to realize it's nature, not PATRIARCHY, but still... women like to imagine themselves attracted to men who are "in touch with their emotions".
/r/MensRights01/10/22 02:24 PM
2

Jordan Peterson is a legitimate intellectual. I disagree with him on many things but even if I disagreed with him on everything, I would still say society would be better off if more academics were like him.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 03:44 AM
3

It's definitely not the case everywhere. In some states, a woman can give the child for adoption without even telling the father so he doesn't even have the chance to say "I'll keep it without child support", you know feminists would call him keeping it with child support against the mothers will slavery.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 11:48 AM
3

So what would you call it if a mother wanted to give a child up for adoption but the father didn't?
/r/MensRights30/09/22 11:33 AM
1

Because desirability is desirable to women, so if other women have en mass rejected a guy that causes women to reject him further. Kinda like a bad credit score, it's self perpetuating.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 11:18 AM
2

Is a father abandoning a child any worse than a mother abandoning a child?
/r/MensRights30/09/22 11:15 AM
4

So you admit that fetucide is wrong?
/r/MensRights30/09/22 02:17 AM
0

Yes. And if America believed in equality, then responsibility for their mutual choice to have sex wouldn't include 18 years of making him responsible for her choice to keep it. But I'll no more support him in tricking her into fetucide than I support women in tricking men into fatherhood. I actually believe parents are responsible to provide for the offspring they conceive. Sex may serve more purposes than reproduction, but that doesn't remove the reproductive aspect.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 12:21 PM
13

imagine if women in general (not even feminists) could show incels 1/10th the empathy they demand everyone show landwhales?
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:58 AM
2

I was a federal employee for 5 years with her, if I were to work another 15 years years and get a pension, she'd be entitled to 1/8th of it as we were married for 1/4th of my time in career. at 5 years I am not entitled to anything and my 401k was already cashed out at the time of our divorce.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:55 AM
-6

said everyone who uses human shields.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:49 AM
-6

I never said you should be happy. I said don't become the evil you are fighting. I realize not everyone can be as fortunate as me and get clean severance from their abusive ex, but if I had had your vengeance mentality I would not have had the leverage to get sole custody.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:48 AM
7

feminism sees that as collateral damage. like if hitler, binladen and hussein were all in one place but there was also a baby present, you'd still drop the bomb.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 01:03 AM
8

horniness makes us do all kinds of stupid things. I once KNEW I didn't want to have any ties to a woman and KNEW I would regret it the second it was over but I still tried. luckily my integrity was stronger than my horny because I knew the correct lies that would have gotten her to do it but refused to say them.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 12:59 AM
7

"not all girls would do that"... no, but all girls CAN, and if they do the state (and every feminist) will facilitate their abuse. your therapist saying it is your fault for trusting her is like saying it is the rape victims fault for taking the dark alley. sure wiser choices could have been made but the violator still SHOULD face justice. unfortunately they won't
/r/MensRights29/09/22 12:55 AM
-33

you been lurking on FDS for too long. abandoning morality just because your enemy doesn't have morals only proves that you don't have morals either.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 12:54 AM
1

A: I don't have a "people". I stand on principles, not tribalism. sometimes the left wants to lynch me, other times the right thinks I am a lefty. B: I always opposed McCarthyism (even when I was more conservative). ending people for speech is AT LEAST as unamerican as anything they might say. If you would abandon your principles because your opposition does not share then, you never held them to begin with. I DO hold the principles that created the constitution. C: I think employers should pay …
/r/MensRights29/09/22 12:33 AM
-2

Never said depression is anyone's fault. But if someone just spends all day on the couch it's because they have either given up on survival, or they are confident someone else will carry them... that confidence is the reason depression is so debilitating in the first world.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 08:51 PM
-5

Ridiculous that depression qualifies for disability. You don't have to feel good about a job, you just have to do it.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 02:21 PM
17

I worked for the federal government for 5 years. If I were to go back and qualify for retirement my ex would be entitled to a portion... that's one reason I wouldn't seek federal employment ever again.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 02:19 PM
9

If men are 10 times as likely to appropriately apply them men being only 3 times as likely to be hired is unreasonable.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 03:42 AM
2

Not a non sequitur, a tangent, and YOU initiate it. Yes, it is sad to think someone who sounds like me might still end up raising a daughter who is foolish enough to buy into the misanthropic death cult that is feminism. So getting back TO the topic. You're ignoring the point, when men abuse women, the law (usually) makes the woman prove it before punishing the man. When women abuse men, the law FACILITATES THE ABUSE!
/r/MensRights27/09/22 10:55 PM
2

There are more men paying child support to their convicted rapists than there are women paying child support to their suspected rapists
/r/MensRights27/09/22 09:47 PM
97

Ironic since relationships with 2 wives include the highest incidence of domestic violence. Does this indifference toward battered lesbians mean Google is homophobic?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 05:41 PM
5

DAMN! I've known for years that feminism is a misanthropic death cult, but never would I have expected one of their missionaries to TRY to instigate the violent intent they protect onto men. Doubly so asking for credit. Oh, I see... your home subreddits have banned you for your activity here without realizing your intent so being scorned, you think you can use us to exact your revenge. Sorry, but everything feminism has taught you about us is wrong. Next time use a sock puppet before visiting th…
/r/MensRights27/09/22 03:34 PM
5

"Those kinds of insults"... so you admit it's gender studies is a degree to be ashamed of? Well, if I am "two to three steps away from being a incel and shooting up a grocery store.", then your attempting to shame me for what you perceive as my lack of sexual would be pushing me closer... you believe you're poking a bear and you call me stupid? hilarious. Luckily for society, feminists like you can't help but be constantly wrong in your bigoted judgements, both of me personally and of Incels in …
/r/MensRights27/09/22 03:08 PM
4

Again, you fail to make clear what exactly it is you are claiming. All you've done is vomit out emotional incredulity. Try actually ̶D̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ S͟a͟y͟i͟n͟g͟ something. You sound like gender studies professors, sure you can finish a sentence, but ultimately you've said nothing more precise than "feelings" Everyone in the MRM is well accustomed to seeing ad hominem attacks.... but the least you could do is actually declare what your ad hominem is, disgust from Pixar's Inside Out is is more eloqu…
/r/MensRights27/09/22 02:13 PM
5

Always love to see such a thoroughly supported position. Strange that you'd put in enough effort to stalk me but not enough effort to support (or even effectively elucidate) your point.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 01:26 PM
17

Women inherently care more about others opinions.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 11:47 AM
24

It's obese woman positivity. Anyone else they acknowledge is a token gesture.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 11:46 AM
2

Dude, I was kidding. Hence the smiley face.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 03:17 AM
12

There's a way to ruin your life
/r/MensRights27/09/22 02:59 AM
10

Stockholm can be a strong syndrome :D
/r/MensRights27/09/22 02:58 AM
8

I don't date if it won't lead to marriage. I have no interest in an interfaith marriage. So no, if she couldn't let go of feminism, our relationship would soon reduce to mere friendship.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 02:54 AM
1

How about you tell me exactly what it is you are claiming I am because you're applying a crazy wide brush.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 03:09 PM
1

Non sequitur much? I can't even tell what topic you're asking about my stand on. Are you asking if I'm a right wing executive worshiper? Hell no. I was calling for UBI for over a decade before I knew the term.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 01:25 PM
-1

Dude... Did you just make this shit up on the spot or is this a wicked case of the telephone game and you lack the discernment to realize it's been distorted? Everything you said is MORE left biased than the leftist media reported. You probably still believe jussie smollette don't you? Edit; this was in response to a comment and it somehow got separated.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 12:14 PM
2

Damn, didn't know Martha's vineyard was such an auschwitz type place. With leftists like the Obamas living there one would imagine it a place welcoming to immigrants. Like they would offer food and housing as they expect the right wing towns on the border to provide... or at least cages like Obama had built in Texas.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 11:23 AM
2

It's more choice than men get who, even when RAPED, are required by law to provide for the needs of children they conceive.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 11:20 AM
0

Yes. Hundreds rioters doing thousands in damage are a much bigger threat to democracy than hundreds of thousands of rioters doing billions in damages. How dare anyone on the right object to the allegations of fraud in 2020 not getting investigated thoroughly when the left spent tens of millions on Russiagate (which was a Clinton hoax from the start. What was the McCain tangent about? Showing that I call out violations of the constitution on both sides of the isle, not just when the other tribe d…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 05:06 AM
2

Fetucide isn't "aka controlling women", it is aka abortion. OUTLAWING it would be controlling women in the same way that mandating child support is controlling men. Don't pretend to understand how complicated arguments are when you can't even get the differences between transitive verbs and policy positions. The right don't stand by the constitution as much as every American citizen should, but where too much of the right might take a cigarette lighter to it, the majority of left are dropping na…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 05:08 PM
1

You'd be surprised. I would say we're pretty close to 90% male, might even be a little less.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:34 PM
1

Republicans blocked it while democrats held both legislatures and the executive office? AND the conservative leaning courts said "this is a matter for the legislature" (which just like fetucide, they are correct on) I guess that is one difference between the right and the left... the right still understands the separation of powers, the left just demands all power.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:30 PM
2

Yes, freedom of SPEECH covers SPEECH you don't like even when spoken by people you don't like. That's kinda the ONLY time it matters.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:22 PM
2

The right would support legal citizen's arrest, fox News sided with the left when a known burglar after he lunged and wrestled over the gun of a citizen attempting to make an arrest.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:20 PM
2

Every group has that problem. Such a degree of nuance erasure could say the same about feminism and the MRM. Doesn't mean there aren't SIGNIFICANT differences.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:12 PM
2

The left did billions in damage during the summer of love, the right did thousands in damage during Jan 6. Yeah, there are differences.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:09 PM
2

The difference between boycott and cancel culture is boycott says "you did something I find reprehensible. I'm not doing business with you" while cancel culture says "you did something I find reprehensible, I'm not allowing others to do business with you". Do you really think anyone who got mad at Rosanne for insulting an Obama advisor were among those who watched her show? The right didn't threaten to destroy any entity that continued doing business with Kathy. Yes, that whole freedom fries thi…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:06 PM
3

Empirically? No. More so than the left? Yes
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:58 PM
1

"That guy" meaning he wants the guy saying "the science says to cut penises" to be lynched by feminists for saying the same thing about cutting vaginas.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 05:02 AM
3

Considering they cited the HIV study that was INcompleted in Africa because their methodology was so flawed no western nation would let them ATTEMPT the study, I'm gonna say the article's sources are suspect to say the least. I can use poor methods too, watch this: "correlation, the western nation which has the most circumcision also has the highest gun crime rate. Thus circumcision makes men more violent." Hmm. Ooh! "Nations which practice female circumcision have far fewer women diagnosed with…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 04:55 AM
19

Fine. I demand rent and separate accounts. You're also gonna be paying 75% of the utilities and 90% of the streaming services. And since the kids are yours as well I expect you to eat half the cost of your child's care wages. All the clothes in your closet? I expect you to return payment for the FULL RETAIL PRICE you bought them for while you were living off my labor... and don't forget, everything I do around the house I now get paid for (half going rates just like you) I'm sorry mrs., but I th…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 03:27 AM
8

Are you kidding? A supermodel murder suicided with her son because the kid's father wouldn't let her take him out of the county to live with her new boyfriend and the meager coverage it did get made HIM out to be the villain. This will amount to NOTHING.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 03:04 AM
1

Lucky it was just a 4 week mute... something like this can more than get you banned in feminist subs.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:44 AM
4

It’s surprising the number of WOmen that are completely willing to kill their child because a man they're gonna trash anyway isn't willing to carry their burden. I wonder why if people will ever look down on fetucide the way they do men who fail to give women money?
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:06 AM
4

Yes, how dare I think my (now ex) wife killing my child is a violation of some sort. !
/r/MensRights24/09/22 10:54 PM
1

Fetucide is exactly a woman abandoning her living child and it can be done for no reason at varying ages "for no reason"
/r/MensRights24/09/22 10:51 PM
1

I'm pro life in preference, pro equality in insistence. If women need the post sex choice to not be mothers, then equality dictates men must also have the post sex choice not to be fathers.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 10:22 PM
6

Well, duh. That saves them 90% of the budget they'd need if they didn't discriminate.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 11:30 PM
9

"You sound like white people complaining that black people condemn white people for the actions of white ancestors when black ancestors did the same thing" Fixed it for you. And no, they don't. They sound more like white people complaining about modern racist discrimination.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 11:27 PM
7

I got news for her, she can't. It takes years for an arm to build up that kind of stamina.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 11:56 AM
4

Biden was the point man for VAWA to supplant the FVPSA. What else would you expect?
/r/MensRights21/09/22 03:02 PM
1

Extremely. Someone might accidentally compliment them if they ever let their RBF down.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 02:59 PM
8

Don't forget "victim blaming no matter how slight is bad, but male victims are no big deal because their attacker is likely male" Feminists don't logic very well.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 08:46 AM
1

Proven true gets a conviction. 5-10% proven false (no consequences), 5-10% proven true (jail time), 80-90% unproven.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 10:07 PM
1

My wife's arms do that... she thinks it's funny that I don't like 190 degree arm positions
/r/MensRights18/09/22 10:05 PM
5

Feminists called "blurred lines" rape culture... the only rape culture in the western world is in prison.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 10:04 PM
2

I don't think 13 year old should be dating. I don't think 16 year old should be having sex. I really don't think their partner being a peer somehow makes it any less unhealthy. At 32 I married a 19 year old (who I met at 19) and emotional nuts still call it pedophilia (it's only pedophilia with prepubescents, post pubescent minors would make it ephebophilia). Still going strong a decade later. As long as you're each getting the relationship you want and it's legal, screw other people's expectati…
/r/MensRights18/09/22 09:53 PM
6

It's not the same. It's less common and more potent. Violence and self restraint are 2 of the many things men are better at than women. Doesn't justify ignoring women's violence
/r/MensRights18/09/22 03:52 PM
2

"which bans almost all terminations after six weeks." Which terminations fall outside that "almost"? Oh yeah, danger to the mother.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 03:39 PM
2

You've been lied to... AGAIN! That girl qualified for an abortion under the rape clause AND the danger to the mother clause. Leaving the state was a feminist stunt. Meanwhile, minor male victims of rape (and adults... but the state doesn't really recognize them) are forced to pay child support should their rapist fall pregnant. So forgive me for being less concerned with a woman theoretically having to travel in order to kill her unborn legally. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-ab…
/r/MensRights18/09/22 03:30 PM
2

I am sorry, since when is "silly" a synonym for "more difficult"?
/r/MensRights18/09/22 03:01 AM
0

I'll take my right hand over wearing a glove. that's why I love monogamy. I have worn less than a dozen condoms in my life.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 02:58 AM
1

how ever many times you have sex in 1,000.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 02:56 AM
-1

Many people share that rule... mostly conservatives. How is that working out for western culture?
/r/MensRights18/09/22 01:55 AM
1

Then I guess I'll live up to your expectations... "What's a bot? hehe" Oh, and I think the word you're looking for is inane, you sock puppeteer
/r/MensRights17/09/22 11:53 PM
1

"How'd I know some[one] would respond with this?" Because you're a hypocrite and this is the INESCAPABLY OBVIOUS response?
/r/MensRights17/09/22 09:26 PM
3

I'd be happy to discover I'm wrong about you.... but it's not likely. I suspect if I were wrong, your response would've been understanding not patronizing. Likewise you would've had some counter argument... When you speak truth I'll agree, but while you're building your cult "army" I'll warn people against. And yes, I "really typed that out", that's kinda how one communicates on reddit.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 09:19 PM
2

I agree with all but one. Women may have more drive to reproduce (actually have children) but when it comes to libido (will to have sex specifically) men (at least between puberty and 30) are driven crazy.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 09:12 PM
27

Yeah. Feminist see men's efforts in the corporate world to mean that's where their happiness comes from... when the truth has always been men only served the corporations TO serve their family. It was always their family that men (in aggregate) were truly dedicated to.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 03:21 PM
3

I would go one step further than this commenter and say that Cassie Jaye's "the red pill" is the perfect starting point for anyone who thinks they even might give a hoot about men's rights or equality.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 02:42 PM
2

Yes, it's derogatory... and accurate
/r/MensRights17/09/22 02:32 PM
4

Says someone with zero karma?
/r/MensRights17/09/22 02:29 PM
3

Don't forget the feminist missionaries false flagging.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 02:25 PM
4

Pay no attention to that idiot. Women aren't mere allies in the MRM... there is nothing in the "men's rights activist" label that says "you must be a man" some of the best MRAs are women (look up honey badger brigade for our most prominent respected women). I was introduced to the fact that men's wellbeing matters (as do our sacrifices) roughly 15 years ago by Christie O'Misty shortly before my ex wife ran away... she may be the push I needed to fight to keep my son (not by anything specific she…
/r/MensRights17/09/22 02:24 PM
4

Roma is what you could call a purple pill. She still believes a lot of the less obvious lies about society, but has gotten through most of the ones that require double think. She has the knowledge that should guide her into following to further her knowledge but the lust for leadership and glory prevents that. I consider her a less malignant grifter who is using the antifeminist truths she has learned to gather male orbiters that she so desperately craves... even her name is support for this ass…
/r/MensRights17/09/22 02:08 PM
6

If you ever want to go back to that sub, use a sock puppet. They'll ban you in a heart beat for questioning the dogma.... they'll ban you if they simply see that you've commented in this sub. And that ban may spread to other feminist subs as well.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 01:43 PM
23

Actually, men are statistically happier (at least according to a study cited by Aydin Paladin recently)... but i am confident it's because we have more will to be happy, NOT because we have more reason to be happy.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 01:30 PM
3

Crazy how feminists think fetucide is the end all be all of liberty. We don't allow men to abandon responsibility for the needs of the children they conceive either... further more, more women than men are pro life, so clearly fetucide is a more nuanced issue than "men are being controlling assholes" There isn't a state in the union suggesting "women can't have an abortion when the pregnancy poses unusual risk to the mothers life. So in that "so they don't die" you're just plain LYING.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 01:09 PM
7

Doubly so when you're hurt that they repeatedly choose assholes who inevitably hurt them! When you care about someone, their pain is your pain.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 02:15 AM
46

the nice guy meme is what happens when niceness is abused until it runs dry. yes the niceness was genuine, it was wasn't a limitless supply. kinda like girls empathy.... though girl's empathy runs out much faster than guy's niceness.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 12:46 AM
2

Sorry, you're confusing analysis with brooding. I was speaking of THE SCENARIO, not my own life. Go hoe your monster self elsewhere.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 10:20 PM
1

Virtually all Women would never marry their equivalent. If women knew their value they wouldn't set standards they can't live up to. The only reason they find success is we are genetically programed to desire them regardless of the burden they pose.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 10:32 AM
3

There's only a hundred and forty
/r/MensRights16/09/22 10:29 AM
5

The challenge is that while feminists falsely claim "women aren't believed", men both aren't believed and when they are are not taken seriously. Even if they were, the burden of proof makes it virtually impossible to convince a jury that a woman raped a man (should be equally difficult as the inverse but is not). This leads to men almost never reporting which obscures accurate stat taking.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:12 AM
1

Try searching unwoke.hr
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:05 AM
-2

Patriarchy is very often real... is just absolutely nothing like feminist doctrines claim. Patriarchy is a society where men are responsible for women's wellbeing. The patriarchy of feminist imagination is where men only have power over women for no good reason. True patriarchies are historically quite common because when men take responsibility for women's wellbeing, society thrives. And when men don't take responsibility for women's wellbeing, societies decay. Women aren't self motivated and p…
/r/MensRights16/09/22 08:47 AM
4

I guess you're right... most women would not bitch, they'd divorce. Then she can have his money without having to work with him.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 08:22 AM
11

A much more rare complication is that some sick monster will turn you and your twin into a "gender" study and result in one of you accidentally overdosing and the other suiciding.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 02:20 AM
4

Yeah, I'd pay money to see "men's lives matter" go viral.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 01:40 AM
4

Who's doing the majority of the killing? Who ever that is needs to be the focus of BLM.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 02:28 PM
4

Fish debating if water is real. Good luck.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:21 PM
5

Right, love is a man sacrificing everything for an ungrateful family.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:17 PM
3

You don't think his wife would bitch if he wasn't bringing home the bacon?
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:15 PM
3

The original disrespect is a home maker thinking that bringing home the bacon isn't arduous.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 11:44 AM
0

I have no problem inviting ANYONE in my house to take over the bills. Having been a single father with sole custody (and no child support) for 3 years, I know what it takes to be a home maker and it pales compared to the 70 hour work weeks I've done most of my life.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 11:38 AM
3

"Cleave into her/him and no one else" is very often an EXPLICIT part of marriage.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 03:16 PM
10

Oh but that's not hatred, it's just expressing frustration unlike when men rationally speak about women's hypergamous nature, that's so much more hateful than calls for gendercide.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 03:12 PM
7

No woman gets wet by such an arrangement
/r/MensRights14/09/22 03:07 PM
20

But ToXiCmAsCuLiNiTy is why men don't talk about their feelings.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 03:06 PM
1

Feminism has been a thing since Caroline Norton wrote the tender years doctrine. It may not have been named yet, but feminism is much older than you think. it's still a crime for an adult to do it, quite rightly I never said a word contrary to this. I said it's not rape. When you make all illegal sex rape you water down the word rape. The idea that Mary Kay Leturneau is categoricaly the same thing as Joseph Rosenbaum is atrocious. When I hear the word "rape" I want to know that it was an act of …
/r/MensRights13/09/22 11:45 AM
1

Didn't say it's not a factor, I said age isn't the difference between "oh, you little scamp" and 🎼🎵we're not safe until he's dead. he'll come stalking us at night. Set to sacrifice our children to his monstrous appetite🎵 No, it's not illegal for adults to encourage/facilitate minors having sex. Schools distribute condoms and the government will give 12 year olds abortions without parental consent. See, this is where you're letting feminists define everything. That "consent" standard was so the m…
/r/MensRights13/09/22 02:31 AM
1

Sorry, but I don't see someone's age being the difference between "let the parents ground them, no need for legal intervention" and "a crime so severe is not uncommon for people to STILL support lynching". If minors having sex is too be illegal (as it should) then adults (including teachers and school administrators) who encourage/facilitate them to have sex with peers should be punished no less severely than had they encouraged/ facilitated them to have sex with another adult.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 06:11 PM
2

I don't disagree with a word of that. Society needs to recognize "not all illegal sex must be 'rape'".
/r/MensRights12/09/22 03:28 PM
6

I don't agree with the sex based discrimination, but if someone is old enough to choose to have sex they're old enough to choose who they have sex with. If someone is too young for the state to respect their consent then it must be rejected regardless of who their chosen partner is.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 02:28 PM
16

boko haram: brutally kill thousands of men and boys and no one bats an eye. kidnap 300 girls and everyone loses their minds
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:55 AM
1

even then, it's going to amputation for phimosis is like going to amputation for an infection... yes, there is a time it becomes necessary, but most of the time it can be treated... hell, even gangrene can often be treated without amputation.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:48 AM
1

not entirely. there is still nearly 1% of cases that will remain because men can get it too.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:45 AM
8

Oh they have citations... of other feminists saying the same bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 04:06 PM
4

All those words and the only true ones are "men's violence against women is far more... destructive". But you know she would deny the reason for that which is that men are stronger.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 04:04 PM
7

They are always inverting the truth.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 04:00 PM
10

Can she provide a definition? "While I can't provide a definition for woman, I can for man... it's OpReSsOr!"
/r/MensRights10/09/22 05:02 PM
5

Sounds great to me. Spread the word woman. I wouldn't want to waste my time or money on anyone capable of believing your advice.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 04:59 PM
2

I immediately disregard anyone who says "lived experience" as the only other "experience"s are virtual and irrelevant thus making "lived" obnoxiously redundant.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 04:01 PM
1

Making hypocritical errors in judgement and being a hypocrite are 2 different things. Fat is a part of everyone's body, but only those for whom fat is disproportionately abundant bear the label of BEING fat.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 03:43 PM
2

Look. Just embrace that no one is gonna accept infant genital mutilation as bad because thinking penises deserve the same protections as vaginas is just absurd. Sorry, I'm not going to support ejecting you for disagreeing with us but, if you truly feel that is sound thinking, the MRM is better off without your input.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 05:00 AM
7

It's no more medical than ear piercing
/r/MensRights10/09/22 04:47 AM
18

Gonna give the same consideration to who ever was assaulting her as statistically they were most likely also a victim? You know as well as we that the sympathy ends at the first male in the chain no matter how severely he suffered.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 04:52 AM
30

If a Scotsman had ACCIDENTALLY done it they'd have formed a lynch mob and destroyed his future.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 04:50 AM
1

I don't care what motivates it but I hope at least her prediction comes true.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 09:18 AM
-10

They're almost as bad as the feminists who have created this Hellscape. This is why teenaged me forsook emotion... people who are ruled by it are a destructive force. Granted I've since learned balance, but if I had to choose between the extremes, I'd pick emotionally dead over emotionally controlled. Based on them downvoting your comment but not mine is say you have a stalker for the day.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 04:45 PM
-1

How the hell are so many not getting the concept of both parties being presumed innocent until PROVEN guilty. Not everything can be proven one way or the other. If it can't be proven you just gotta move on. If they want to punish anyone, punish the prosecutor for moving forward with a case that has no evidence! Punish those who make the process itself punishment.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:48 PM
2

No, you take it 1 step too far for both. Amputation can be tolerated if medically necessary even for kids. And adults should be allowed to cosmetically mutilate themselves however they want.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:20 PM
3

I judge with all the information I have and never stop evaluating. Withholding judgement just means pretending your insufficient information is no information. Some people say "better safe than sorry", I say "he who hesitates is lost". Maybe I'm foolish, but my gambles generally pay off... in my divorce I got sole custody and clean severance and my wife of the past 10 years has adopted my child of my first marriage and is currently carrying my 4th. You wanna play it safe? Good for you, gay relat…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 07:27 AM
19

karen straughan is a founding honeybadger.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:39 AM
2

"might she be a bitch? sure" clearly you missed that. I didn't say I know every detail about her... I said this trait suggests a desirable character. just like a modern riotous mob suggests BLM/ANTIFA, but could POSSIBLY be the jan 6 rioters. Act on anticipation of the highest probability, but keep your eyes open for every possibility.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:36 AM
9

my sister ignored my objections for her child... the pediatrician who performed it botched it and adhesions flipped his penis upside down. the pediatrician tried calling it a birth defect. the reconstructive surgeon revealed that was a lie.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:27 AM
16

it's a thing. I can't decide which is more abominable, a man who'll cut his son because "his should look like mine" or women who gut their sons because they think it looks better... I'll dress my daughter up so I find her cute, but what the hell kind of parent wants to find their childs genitals appealing to their personal tastes?
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:13 AM
7

maybe, but it is unlikely. it takes intellect to break from tradition. it takes intellect to think about whether the how everyone around you who you love and trust are actually right... it takes an intellect that is likely to have a firm grasp on the golden rule. might she be a bitch? sure, but when it comes to infant genital mutilation, I will take an objecting bitch over a polite people pleaser any day.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:10 AM
3

I didn't say it doesn't have religious origins, but the vast majority of American circumcisions are not based in the decision makers religious beliefs.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:01 AM
8

I'm glad you are happy it was done. If your meaning to say you're happy it was done to you in infancy, I've known minors (both in news media, AND PERSONALLY) who were happy with the adults they have sex with... doesn't mean it should be legal.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 08:36 PM
9

No kidding. Foreskin is far neater than beef curtains... and it actually serves multiple purposes.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 08:32 PM
7

Oh, they have a study to cite that shows a fraction of a percent decrease in HIV infection rate. Performed in Africa because they couldn't get a western nation to approve the study methodology. With a tiny sample size making the ± of the study far greater than the resulting "benefit". Ended prematurely. Not compensating for the "down time" of the newly cut group during which the (uncut) group kept having unprotected sex. And other methodological abortions of science that make the study as depend…
/r/MensRights04/09/22 08:28 PM
33

Not mutilating boys is a "militant feminist" belief? Damn, your parents are a ignorant as the intersectionalists who call me a "TERF" Bravo. Too few people are able to go against the herd these days. I'm glad your sons have a decent mother.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 08:11 PM
23

Americans circumcise without religious excuses
/r/MensRights04/09/22 08:07 PM
1

You think I'm upset by your buzz words? No, I love the lexicon of your misanthropic death cult... the fact that you can't not use it is like if the kkk were to glue their hoods on. It makes you easy to identify without the slighted effort.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:03 PM
1

"Mansplaining"... You think yourself more qualified to determine the thoughts of a particular woman who you've never met than someone who has literally known her since birth and lived with her for a third of her life including during the activity being discussed and again over a decade later? Damn, that is a severe case of feminism you're suffering there. I hope you can overcome it soon. You'll have to forgive my previous comment for saying your question was fair on the chance you weren't being …
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:22 PM
1

right, but cougars are different. so strong and empowered (independent). nothing like dirty old men who are just in it for the sex. /s
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:16 PM
2

standing in opposition to the lynch mob doesn't mean I agree with their target. go troll elsewhere. and take off your sock puppet before you do.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 08:54 PM
2

She doesn't blame her parents for her choice to have sex. She considers her parents efforts to prevent her having sex (sending her to reform school, etc) to be her childhood trauma. The sex was just sex, not trauma. She has been a promiscuous hedonist for decades now. Before you blow up half cocked like most people do on this topic; My position that it is an insult to victims of actual rape (both adult and minor) to call sex with a consenting (possibly aggressive) minor "rape" does NOT mean I be…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:43 PM
7

I have a relative who used livelinks (pre internet tinder) to seek men starting at age 12. The guys are disgusting but calling it rape is to insult victims of the trauma that is actual rape. Now, in her late 30s, If you ask her about her childhood trauma she'll tell you of her parents efforts to STOP her hooking up, not the men who she hooked up with.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 04:05 AM
1

https://youtu.be/0c2bKZMxEQg
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:38 AM
1

Violent acts that are disproportionately perpetrated against men and boys... that's nearly all of them.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:32 AM
0

Was there ever a question? I haven't watched anything marvel since end game.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:48 AM
3

Well if mysoggyknees stopped her then I'll soak them more
/r/MensRights28/08/22 05:31 PM
6

So. Women are warmongers but it's far worse that society thinks they're not because then we don't put them in the positions to allow them to be warmongers they generally are. When facts prove their "women are good because..." is untrue, they change the "because" to the bad thing and now "because not" must be thought as good.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 01:04 PM
4

the crime is so awful that you gotta punish someone, anyone. it is far more important that we get our vengeance than maintain civilization. presuming the accused innocent might embarrass the accuser. well, it is something the accused would do if they had the chance so they might as well be guilty. feminism. . those arguments against the presumption of innocence all seem equally "good" to me. my ex told stories of marital rape to manipulate her cyber boyfriends. 3 months after the last time we ha…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 11:15 PM
0

Is it something like a manicotti?
/r/MensRights27/08/22 01:46 PM
2

An expert badge they only got due to lowered standards for women.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 01:45 PM
1

purple pill means you know feminism is a messed up movement, but fail to fully realize how deep their roots and corruption go. blue pill is swallowing the world they imagine hook line and sinker. Black pill is "humanity needs an asteroid"
/r/MensRights27/08/22 04:54 AM
1

red pill just means you know the mainstream is lying to you about the human relationships. mens rights is that we know we're being shafted in that our rights are not commensurate our responsibilities. or just that we don't have equal rights. MGTOW means that you are abandoning romantic/sexual entanglements all together. ​ I have taken a bottle of red pills, I am an MRA, and if I ever find myself single again I will be uncommitted MGTOW.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 04:51 AM
3

my sister in law says that the fact that her dad got custody proves there isn't an antimale bias in family court... then in a different argument she spoke of the horrible abuse she suffered under her mother's care before her father finally got custody. I was doing the frustrated Jackie Chan meme.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 04:44 AM
4

Feminism hurts women too. Sorry, but can you blame him? Today you may not imagine accusing him, but he has no certainty what tomorrow you would do. I was married for 6 years before my ex started telling marital rape lies to manipulate her cyber boyfriends. Thank God it was a sexless marriage, Otherwise she'd have probably taken those lies to the police.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:13 PM
3

Early feminism is Caroline Norton and the tender years doctrine changing default custody from the father to the mother. Then shortly there after inventing child support. You're about 100 years late for "early feminism". As for women voting... the fact that they got the tender years doctrine pushed through before they had the right to vote proves that women have political power even without the vote (because men in power are eager to advantage women proving the patriarchy of feminist imagination …
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:33 PM
1

I didn't say women are more likely to lie.i said men are more likely to overplay their sexual history (in all aspects) and that women are more likely to downplay their sexual history (in all aspects). I made no statement as to which groups dishonesty was more prevalent, only the divergent target of their dishonesty.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 12:16 PM
5

I have a "feminist" friend who posts Jason Momoa stuff and comments that if the sexes were reversed all her feminist friends would block her.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:49 AM
1

Ah, I see I misinterpreted. I still say that's evidence of my claim, but I admit your argument isn't off the mark as I thought.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:47 AM
1

You're really thick. That wasn't evidence that "women cheat more", that was evidence that "women think 'it's different' when they misbehave". Jerry Springer's audience and particularly considered uncivilized... you gonna give a similar denigrating of the audience of "the talk"?
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:38 AM
1

My statement had nothing to do with how likely either sex is too cheat. It was about how likely they are to report cheating. The douche men who cheat are more likely to take pride in their ability to "get some", the women who cheat think it doesn't count when they do it. This statement is about the men and women who cheat, not men and women in general.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:34 AM
1

Yes, when speaking empirically, women see more acts as cheating. But the mindset of 'it's different when I do it' is also more prevalent. Think women don't think that way? Here is an ENTIRE AUDIENCE of normal women agreeing with Sharon Osborne saying just that. https://youtu.be/91O3wDSy_HE
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:28 AM
1

Hmm, what could throw off a self reported survey.. perhaps the ego of men wanting to report sexual success as accomplishment? Maybe the ego of women who want to think themselves good so "he didn't count"? My ex thought "we're soul mates" meant her 2 cyber affairs didn't count even when she ran away with #3
/r/MensRights25/08/22 10:20 AM
2

Because many women believe it's not cheating when they do it.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 10:13 AM
5

Well now I'll make you feel single.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 10:12 AM
1

Oh, they're unhappy, just less unhappy than they'd be without someone to leach off of.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 10:08 AM
2

"Both work" rarely means both work comparably hard. I've worked 70 hours weeks in 4 different fields for 8 different companies... between 2 wife's and a combined 17 years of marriage, I've never seen even a single 40 hour work week, not even when I was home for 6 months for OJI and she was doing Uber. Meanwhile my second week doing lyft the ap shut me down saying 'you're working too hard'
/r/MensRights25/08/22 10:05 AM
4

Fish arguing water doesn't exist
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:34 AM
17

really? so feminists had nothing to do with inventing child support to return custodial responsibility to the father after having taken custodial rights from him with caroline norton's tender years doctrine?
/r/MensRights24/08/22 11:16 PM
6

I am a near free speech absolutist. if I don't believe in censoring rabid feminists, I don't believe in censoring anyone. I don't know or care who andrew tate is.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:30 PM
0

women are less driven to infidelity, but they are also much lower in self discipline.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:01 PM
1

Because they're more neotenous
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:49 PM
2

Putin wants CRIMEA!. What do you suspect Trump have him instead?
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:03 PM
1

show me a blind squirell who can keep russia out of ukraine, chill kim jung un, get the abraham accords going, and piss off carreer liars to the point that they are failing to hide their undemocratic nature. trump is an ass who I hated since long before hating him was popular... but he did a damn good job as president considering all the shit those with DTS were spraying at him.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 05:59 AM
3

Say "no, not finding success in romance makes me an incel, but thank you so much for your wonderful display of how compassionate women are. It's enough to save me from my inceldom by driving me to MGTOW.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 03:00 AM
2

They can suck my white male privilege. And once they do they can show it to me because I haven't found it yet.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 11:52 PM
6

Yes, things were shitty on both sides. But thanks to feminism, all the rights men had to enable them to bear responsibilities, women have received without those responsibilities. You can give token objections to the shit men have but until feminism tries giving women responsibilities or men rights, they are anti equality.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 11:24 PM
13

Yes, so let's give women the right to be forced into military service. maybe we should give them the right to have their genitals mutilated in infancy. Or maybe we should give women the same right as men when it comes to whether or not they will become a parent (s"he should've thought of that when he chose to have sex") Yes. Equal rights and equal responsibilities is a VERY desirable thing... too bad feminism wouldn't know equality if it was shown to them in first grade math.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 10:34 PM
17

Huge and profound... yes, I'll agree with that. But I'm guessing we disagree on whether that huge and profound effect is desirable.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 09:33 PM
20

"Real feminism is what powerless nobodies like me say, not what the authors, lobbyists, and academics do with it."
/r/MensRights21/08/22 09:09 PM
5

1st. maybe engagement means something else where you are but the marriage never happened. 2nd. you want warm fuzzies, fine. but that takes a back seat to food and shelter. she didn't have "education choices", she just wanted the title of college graduate with no idea what field she'd choose... so yeah, I will definitely talk down to that in the face of anyone who has a field of passion OR must provide for a family, it's laughable to think it comparable to both combined. no, I don't just think of…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 11:25 AM
7

not "absolutely", hopefully though. never be over confident in a nation that charges males child support for the baby born from the rape the woman was convicted for,
/r/MensRights21/08/22 10:37 AM
0

you screwed up big time... but giving into her will only give her more power over you. accept that you're in trouble and report her to the police to take her power over you away. you might face legal punishment, but she will face more, and if you don't it'll only become worse.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 10:29 AM
8

yeah. my wife of 10 years is carrying my 4th child.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 09:05 AM
7

they're not "ignoring male victims", they're "victim blaming". the crime is just fine and the victim deserving since the victim shares a demographic attribute with the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 08:01 AM
12

loneliness. her foolishness is why I ended it.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 07:43 AM
30

I was engaged to a nonfeminist who was insulted that I believed the education I was going for was more important than the education she wanted to go for. I wanted to become a mechanical engineer to provide for our future family, she didn't know what she wanted to study, only that she wanted everyone to clap and cry at her graduation.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 04:38 AM
4

The FBI says 8% of rape accusations are proven false. this claims the conviction rate is 5%. proven cases are convicted. you'll never find this comparison on a single source that is feminist friendly (which is most) because narrative is more important than truth. it would be just as unfounded to claim the remaining 87% are true as it is to claim they are false.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 03:12 AM
2

Let us not forget. Presumed innocent until proven guilty. That said, prisons should have enough surveillance that such proof would be easy.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 03:02 AM
8

Nothing really ground breaking there. Nice to see a sensible woman though.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:55 AM
4

Yeah, despite all assignments she's failed to do, she is doing the job she was selected for quite well... impeachment/25th_ammendment armor. NOBODY wants her to take the reigns.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:45 AM
3

WELL PUT!
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:42 AM
6

They're projecting why they can find misogyny in how men sit!
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:41 AM
6

Better faking it for laughs than actually doing it for politics... oh, wait, never mind.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:39 AM
24

Not to mention, they would do it to themselves. The Adamses were disturbing without being harmful or even malicious... that was their charm.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:38 AM
5

Peacock. They have SO MUCH I don't understand why they are not a (if not the) leading streaming service.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:36 AM
7

No kidding. But to be honest, I'm more upset at them turning the Adam's family from a light hearted juxtaposition comedy into full horror. That's like rewriting Abby Sciutto as a miserable misanthrope. Tim Burton, brilliant though he may be, totally missed the point of the Adam's family! This actress also lacks that charm Christina Ricci nailed so perfectly. And is that ghoul really supposed to be Gomez? I fear this will be almost a bad as Shyamalan's Avatar.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:34 AM
12

Biden found a running mate who is worse. Hyena Harris couldn't even win a single delegate in her primary.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:00 AM
1

Yep. I'm too stupid to get feminist cinema. And feminist movie makers are too stupid to turn a profit. Wonder which of our stupidities hurt more?
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:38 PM
2

Mary p Koss made a similar statement when helping the FBI define rape.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:25 PM
55

Always save evidence. Never let them know what evidence you've saved. My ex gave up all rights to my child (who she birthed) with no fight beyond bluffing when we divorced. As much as I hate her, I'm glad I didn't have to ruin her life to fully get her out of mine.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 03:53 AM
2

Well, yeah... when Feminist Academic leader Mary P Koss defines rape for the FBI as something that can't be done using a vagina, then yeah, DRAMATICALLY more men than women will perpetrate it.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:48 AM
10

If they support men's rights or women's responsibilities, they're apostates to feminism.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:58 AM
8

Men don't just go and talk to eachother. They talk while doing stuff. If you don't have anything for them to do they won't come. Whether it be watching a game (gag me) wood working, golfing, fishing, gaming, what ever... men will only go if there is something more than talking to do.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:57 AM
4

Potato Potato
/r/MensRights14/08/22 04:13 PM
1

He's talking about being able to get away with it. Not doing it. And in that topic, yes, it is all women can get away with it
/r/MensRights14/08/22 04:12 PM
3

Yeah, I got lucky... my ex wasn't feminist but she was so bad that had she not given up and fought for custody I could have sent her to jail.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 03:49 PM
2

The funny thing about equality is if you have to specify who gets it, it ain't equality.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 03:40 PM
1

My bad.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 01:19 AM
1

Except they'rer not equivalent then. The men they think their equivalent spent their 20s building their future... they spent their 20s having fun.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 01:18 AM
9

Bad bot! Buzzfeed is a LESS credible site even than CNN.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:38 PM
12

Being charged means the you're going to go to trial. Being sentenced means you were already convicted and they're assigning your punishment.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:36 PM
20

Judicial discretion. Out in 4 years. I hope I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:35 PM
16

"He had it commin', He had it commin', he only had himself to blame" Watch her get a slap on the wrist and continue her "career" from "prison"
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:33 PM
3

Nowhere near as severe as your situation... but yes, and by professionals whose job was to know better. I was blamed for being a victim when stopping the violation would mean worse blame. My ex wife spent us into bankruptcy (AND a second one after the 7 years was up years after the divorce). She did this both through nickel and diming and through hospital hopping claiming legitimate medical cause. A debt judge said that despite HIPAA, precedent says husbands are responsible for their wife's medi…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:02 PM
6

No, because median and mean are not the same average. Yes, the average number of heterosexual encounters of men and women are the same... but the average man has fewer than the average woman because the top men have WAY THE HELL MORE than the top women.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 05:26 AM
15

They'd rather share than have a male equivalent to themselves.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 05:24 AM
1

Worse. They should be required to register as barrators.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 10:25 PM
2

Woman: adult human female. That's the only working definition and the point. The fact that trans ideology pioneer Dr John Money was abusive to children is a SIDE TOPIC. not the point.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 04:24 PM
1

Why should anyone answer your question when you can't even give a working definition of the word "man" and "woman".
/r/MensRights10/08/22 09:11 PM
27

Anyone who says that is declaring mama to be a toxic narcissist
/r/MensRights10/08/22 03:43 PM
1

Being a good digger is 100% about the money. Hypergamy takes social status into account. And yes, it is biologically motivated the same as men's attraction to youthful vitality so i don't condemn the preference. However As humans we SHOULD be more than our base biological urges.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 03:22 PM
2

Definitions are refined, not dissolved. Pluto didn't lose its status as planet because someone felt like it. The definition of planet was refined and Pluto didn't measure up. The only OBJECTIVE definitions I've ever been given for man and woman are the historical biological definitions. Care to give it a shot? ketanji brown jackson couldn't.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 02:10 PM
2

Laura bates's middle name is mastur
/r/MensRights09/08/22 12:46 PM
1

I know a woman who broke down crying over feelings of guilt for her parents and the law marking a dude in the registry in her name against her will 20 years earlier.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 09:07 PM
7

"Girls are weird"... followed by a call to violence? No? Didn't think so.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 05:40 AM
6

NO, the shirt in the post is just petty, not violent. I said it's mild compared to a different shirt (and book), try to keep up. My suggestion is in response to the shirt "boy are stupid, throw rocks at them" and relative to that my shirt is LESS offensive. "femes" is intended to mean feminists (though it CAN apply female wide) while "boys" is indisputably applied to the entire gender, not just those of a certain philosophy. Further more throwing rocks is far more violent than smacking.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 04:55 AM
14

not only do the shirts exist, it's a kids book! https://www.amazon.com/s?k=boys+are+stupid+throw+rocks+at+them&sprefix=boys+are+stu%2Caps%2C179&ref=nb_sb_ss_mission-aware-v1_1_12
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:47 PM
14

If any of my sons were to mention girls wearing those shirts, I would buy one for them and on the inside print "femes are crazy, smack some sense into them". then when someone in authority objects they could turn it rightside out and say "is this better? because I see this around school all the time"
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:46 PM
87

Better than "boys are stupid, throw rocks at them"
/r/MensRights07/08/22 06:03 PM
1

If you can't handle the burden of ASKING them end it... you're only going to resent him. If anyone decides to marry my son they'll have this problem. He isn't self motivated in the slighted and the running gag is that he'll live in a van down by the river. Sounds like executive dysfunction and you'll never aspire spite him into overcoming it. Do you really think someone mentally damaged lacking of self motivation is much worse than someone mentally healthy getting angry at having to ask?
/r/MensRights07/08/22 05:13 PM
7

Those in a culture of female circumcision are also told that. It's just as true.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 04:59 PM
2

Yes, it's the one used since it was spelled and pronounced wifman and before the were was dropped from wereman. It is "adult human female".
/r/MensRights07/08/22 02:35 PM
6

Only to dodge any responsibility like getting drafted into war.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 05:54 AM
5

Biological imperative.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:29 PM
3

Can you provide a definition for the word woman?
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:22 PM
14

If not for the existence of gynocentric laws or a significant feminist church, I wouldn't be an MRA. I'm an MRA BECAUSE I'm an egalitarian. As an egalitarian i have observed that the funny thing about equality is that if you have to specify who gets it, it ain't equality. Telling someone they're wrong isn't deeming them "invalid" regardless of what you believe they're wrong about. Here, let's see how different you are from Ketanji Brown Jackson.... can you provide a definition of the word man? W…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 04:44 PM
12

Most MRAs don't need to gender their language. As such our policy positions cover trans people as well as everyone else. But "trans inclusion" these days generally means agreeing with their beliefs. That's irrelevant to any equality or men's rights position. You can be for it or against it and still be an MRA.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:24 PM
1

Too be fair. The presuming of innocence all Americans are SUPPOSED to get means Bail should only be denied to prevent fleeing or reoffense while awaiting trial. The government can 100% stop her from committing more of this crime by NOT assuming she's telling the truth if she tries so there is no need to deny bail. That said. This legally required presumption of innocence until PROVEN guilty needs to be extended to men again.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:17 PM
1

Install some cameras and tell her "clearly I can't see how abusive I am in the moment, so this will allow me to look back at it when I've calmed down and am sensible again." If she objects again "why would you deny me a tool to help me stop abusing?" Make it so the only way she can object is to admit that it is she, and not you, who is the abuser.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:03 PM
1

If I had to choose between laws slightly stricter than America's most strict state, and the same laws as exist in America's 7 least strict states, I'd side with the former.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 02:54 PM
7

I tell them they're victim blaming.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:49 AM
9

Bodily autonomy
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:45 AM
12

But not her child's body. Every argument for elective fetucide is more valid an argument against uncommitted mandatory child support.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:45 AM
1

Snafu. Situation Normal, All Fouled Up.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 02:20 AM
3

Feminism is as feminism does. If the only "feminists" who fight for actual EQUALITY are excommunicated like Christina Hoff Sommers, but literally violent man haters like Valerie Solanas are still cited and respected feminist academics, it doesn't matter what bullshit feminists SAY defines their religion, what matters is how feminist leadership acts. Feminism has less to do with equality than Westboro has to do with "spreading the pure love of Christ"
/r/MensRights04/08/22 11:52 AM
2

you ever see those comics where a man seeks out a guru on top of a mountain for wisdom? the wise man lives up on that mountaintop with no easy access to ensure he is not targeted by any false accusations because to target him the woman would have to make the climb.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 01:51 AM
0

if the payor of child support violated marriage vows or similar commitment, then I vehemently support child support as the payee may not have chosen to have children had the payor never committed to raise children together. in all other cases (the payee violated or otherwise ended the marriage or no commitment to raise children together was ever made) then yes, all these cases of child support must be abolished. no matter what "apples and oranges" excuses feminists make up, I sacrifice my body f…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 11:52 PM
2

Yes
/r/MensRights03/08/22 08:42 PM
2

Sure, but only the "trans" ones
/r/MensRights03/08/22 08:22 PM
1

man: male human.male: of the sex that produces mobile gametes (aka sperm) as opposed to the sex that produces ova (eggs)
/r/MensRights03/08/22 03:22 PM
5

hell, I have been called a feminist more times than a feminist has had a valid counter argument. it's like they can't help but sling random slurs and forget that not all TEs are RFs
/r/MensRights03/08/22 04:18 AM
2

Sure. Once we stop pretending "consent" is anything other than an expressed or displayed willingness.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 05:33 PM
1

My ex-wife thought like you... then her first 2 cyber affairs were minors, she also felt infidelity was atrocious and had no excuse, her third affair went real world and resulted in divorce. When you trust your feelings to be your guide rather than reason, you're more likely to do the "unthinkable" because you're not really thinking to begin with.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 07:57 AM
1

Never said adults seduced by sexuality aggressive teenagers should get a pass, only that calling them rapist is an insult to the victims of RAPE. Normal, healthy adults lusted after 15y/o Taylor Lautner and Britney Spears, and they are only the most dramatic examples, not unique in this way. 200 years ago there wasn't a culture in earth that didn't consider 15 adult and biology can't keep up with social evolution. What separate us from animals isn't our biological drivers, is our ability to choo…
/r/MensRights02/08/22 07:05 AM
2

You're romanticizing consent at the end. Every entity with a functioning mind can and does consent to all sorts of things. But just as signing a contract we as a society NULLIFY IT when we deem it unacceptable for various reasons. Sex doesn't have to be "rape" to be a crime. Growing up I knew 2 girls who actively pursued men (one did so on livelinks, pre-internet tinder). I support sending the men they had sex with to jail, but calling that rape diminishes the horror that is RAPE. When either of…
/r/MensRights02/08/22 03:57 AM
8

If I ever find myself single again I'll follow the Groucho Marx philosophy. 'I wouldn't date any women who would have me for a boyfriend.'
/r/MensRights02/08/22 03:40 AM
6

Seduction is persuasion, totally acceptable. Utilizing evolutionary triggers against you doesn't negate your will. Affirmative consent is a BULLSHIT standard and MUST be fought against tooth and nail. This whole romanticizing of the word "consent" needs to stop. Consent is any expression of willingness be it in word, action, or even inaction. Case in point, airport security has no authority, they screen you by consent. The obvious situation means your mere presence is implied consent and you mus…
/r/MensRights02/08/22 02:40 AM
32

Rape needs to be narrowed to "sexual intercourse against the will of the person; whether through force, threat of violence, extortion, or subterfuge." This clears out consentual drunkenness negating consent to sex and eliminates the gender bias.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 04:25 PM
3

If the left can get away with reducing the president to a number and not calling it dehumanizing, then those who are of a political persuasion that rejects the gender tradition of language can be called "it" without it being dehumanizing.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 11:51 AM
8

Strange how blacks who are FROM AFRICA find more success in America than blacks who are multigenerationally American. It's almost a if it has nothing to do with how Americans see people of the black race, and much to do with a culture prevalent among America's black community that produces unsuccessful adults.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 05:47 AM
6

Welcome to the zoo. 😆. I can't speak for everyone here but I took no offense. If any of us are thin skinned enough to take offense at the zoo comment, they're happy to let your compassion for your man eclipse the offense. I'm guessing if you post a bunch of subtle 'no one will like or dislike this comment' stuff elsewhere that will to push this comment down your activity profile you might escape their ban happy bigotry.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 05:28 AM
2

Water isn't a threat to rock, but because the rock can do nothing to stop the water water can carve all the way through the rock. She'll escalate until YOU are arrested for having to defend yourself.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 04:22 AM
1

You'd likely go to jail if you defended yourself (not even retaliation.) Imagine if there was ANY evidence Johnny had reciprocated even half of Amber's violence... even without defending himself it took years and millions of dollars to clear his reputation.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 04:18 AM
6

Block me too. Let's see how long your block list can get.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 04:12 AM
3

Not hatred. He just didn't want to assume your gender. Men can be feminists too.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 04:09 AM
24

Well, you're wrong as both left and right includes tyrants and anarchists, but that isn't anything to get banned for.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:08 PM
6

And you don't realize that the "principles" of feminism are why you were banned? 😔. To all leftist subcategories, tribe is everything.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:06 PM
5

Awe, I triggered a robot
/r/MensRights31/07/22 06:16 PM
4

Just noticing that water is wet?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 06:11 PM
8

Well yeah. She loses a higher portion of his income than he loses...
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:47 PM
3

Potato potato
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:28 PM
4

Maybe she was going to flash him some beaver to serve him his last sights. Or did I misspell that religious ceremony?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:27 PM
3

They never have had a sense of responsibility. When women carry a load it's for their pleasure (self fulfillment, etc.) Which explains why so many women "work" in MLMs that are really social networks profiting them a fraction of what even minimum wage would. Most women only take responsibility because they want a privilege they've failed to get without it. "It's so hard to be a woman".'because my pathological need to be impractical means I must push boundaries and it's awkward when I cross the l…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:18 PM
10

Karen Straughan is the man.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:11 PM
1

SLAVERY. Responsibilities being forced upon men doesn't mean they be force upon women.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:04 PM
0

I didn't ask for the "dictionary" definition. I asked for the commented definition. I've been trying to get the leftist approved definition for over a decade. All I ever get are circular reasoning and using words in their own definition. Science could never know whether Pluto is a planet without a working definition, and I can't know whether or not I'm a lesbian with a shenis until I have a working definition.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 12:21 PM
6

They're different when the left need them to be, and synonymous when the left need them to be.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 05:13 AM
6

Can you provide a definition for the word woman?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 05:11 AM
5

Treat her as she thinks a misogynist abusive father should be treated. Cut her off.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 10:30 PM
6

You'd say similar about my divorce story. Stories involving absurd women happen because many women are absurd in their behavior, not because men are absurd writers
/r/MensRights29/07/22 11:35 AM
4

Oh no, most MGTOW realize they need women the same as we have for all history... they just realize feminism has made them radioactive so they're better off suffering loneliness than metoo
/r/MensRights29/07/22 11:29 AM
1

At least we make them comb to find hateful weird from us. All we have to do is take a quick glance to find hate from them
/r/MensRights27/07/22 11:12 PM
1

If only that was the worst thing they do.
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 11:08 PM
1

I find this claim of prevalence dubious. I don't doubt they're comparable in frequency, and I'm confident you're right about boys not saying anything... but I don't even see how one could measure accurately enough to confidently claim more boys are raped than girls.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 06:30 PM
2

When you correct people, make sure you're not INcorrecting them. https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/are-stupider-and-stupidest-real-words
/r/MensRights27/07/22 03:36 PM
3

Then they wouldn't be feminists.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:44 PM
2

"Generalization can be valid when speaking of a general population. 'Women are weaker and shorter than men' is not invalidated by the existence of Venus Williams and Rick Moranis"
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:44 PM
1

I like that
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:41 PM
2

Please explain to me why the adjective "dumb" can be made superlative with the suffix "est" but the adjective "stupid" can not be made superlative with the suffix "est". I've seen it claimed but never explained.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:40 PM
6

Ambien and Marijuana at the same time... and maybe some of Joe Biden's mental decay thrown in.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:34 PM
1

"I know what is like to be harassed, I just don't know what is like to be too weak to handle it. Nor do I know what it's like to have support for when I damsel over it."
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:31 PM
3

https://www.webmd.com/baby/features/eating-for-2-not-too-much I wasn't exact in my language. The amount more women generally eat is because of an excuse. Yes they do need to eat more but not as much a most do. I'll admit the cost of an extra 300 calories a day is more significant than I implied if you'll admit that it's less significant than you implied..$2-3 bucks per day on the HIGH end. 1 pound of steak provides for 4 days of that.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:18 PM
13

Women eat more because they have an excuse. The dietary needs of a pregnant woman are on average still less than the dietary needs of a healthy man. But other than the food statement, yeah.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 03:45 AM
3

Sure. If Women can't kill their baby but can adopt the baby away; gestation support seems fair to me. It should be based on her pregnancy expenses and can include lost work. The following 18 to 23 years are what I oppose without expressed agreement. Then again, I have opposed hook up culture forever so I don't think most people should be having sex without child centric commitment first.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 03:40 AM
3

I'm an ex incel from before there was even a word for it. I was 23 before I got my first girlfriend and marrying her ruined my life. Somehow I still avoided taking the black pill but I can definitely understand how it happens. I think Mary Shelly's Frankenstein is a perfect exploration into the evolution of an incel.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:24 PM
1

Never even heard of them. We're they too cowardly to have their words associated with their public identity as well?
/r/MensRights26/07/22 12:23 PM
3

When they have to do so as a sock puppet
/r/MensRights26/07/22 11:32 AM
2

My ex wife is in Kentucky. I'll stay far away from that devil. No sense risking the sole custody I leveraged when she ran away...I guess that is no longer a fear since my wife finally adopted my son. But still, I could be happy if distance ensures I'll never see her again.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 02:20 AM
3

Come back with your main. Or are you afraid your home feminist reddit groups will ban you for simply commenting here?
/r/MensRights26/07/22 02:11 AM
4

My sister in law's husband just had a court approved noninvolvement (no contact nor child support) agreement standing 15 years reversed and back dated by a year and was told he should be grateful the judge didn't back date it further. And the idea that feminism is to blame for this will never cross either of their minds.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 02:08 AM
2

I'm anti censorship. I don't care who they are or what they're sincerely advocating. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 12:05 AM
1

Last I heard from her she told them to go to hell even if non_offending. her dehumanizing of nonoffenders is a portion of why I stopped following her... but mostly her obnoxious demeanor. I get it's a character that sells, but not for me. Kinda like a childish more left leaning Terrance Popp.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 12:01 AM
1

He was a hypocrite for being a horn dog and drug user/sharer contrary to his America's dad persona. Maybe I'm wrong but I heard the whole thing was metoo bullshit. She literally took the drugs she asked him for in pill form. If they're going to call that him "drugging" her, I'm going to be skeptical about how they describe everything.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 04:10 AM
5

People don't like their religion challenged
/r/MensRights24/07/22 03:19 PM
2

I've been homeless. I even support mandating restrooms being open to them for toilet use... but if they going to abuse the courtesy they are going to suffer consequences... better that than locking them out of bathrooms by default.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 02:39 PM
1

I was discussing people who drug someone deceptively... the only deception is the media saying he "drugged" her, she literally asked him for the drugs!
/r/MensRights24/07/22 05:33 AM
1

I just keep encouraging them to sex strike.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 05:19 AM
2

if someone is camping in the restroom, call the cops on them for loitering and trespassing. locking the restrooms on restaurants and convenience stores is unacceptable.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:30 AM
1

don't let them use your toilet, you deserve for them to use your bushes. any place that sells ready to eat food should be expected to have restrooms available as a public service. consider it a cheap and easy tax.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:25 AM
4

I think any place that serves ready to eat food and does not allow public access to their plumbing deserves the side of their building to be used as an outhouse.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:21 AM
2

today I learned a new word
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:18 AM
3

frankly, I think any restaurant or convenience store that locks it's restrooms or otherwise says "restrooms are for customers only" deserves their landscaping to be used instead.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:15 AM
-12

Sorry to sound like a feminist, but when one spouse goes to jail BOTH are affected. She endured 10 years of that separation... he absolutely had the worst of it and thus deserves the lions share but her life also got flipped turned upside down, her family was torn apart and contrary to feminist doctrine, the family is important. I could see giving her up to 25%, at least for the portion she stayed with him. I know my wife going to jail would seriously cripple my life.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 04:40 PM
1

Might that be because makes are taught to take what they get and not expect anyone to give a shit about them?
/r/MensRights23/07/22 03:20 PM
2

And there's the cope.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 03:18 PM
2

You mean the study that wasn't finished and had a pathetic sample size and the results were smaller than expected deviation?
/r/MensRights23/07/22 03:16 PM
1

It causes seizures. See I can make up untrue shit to support my position too
/r/MensRights23/07/22 03:15 PM
6

Roofies are great like that right? "Who cares, she won't remember"
/r/MensRights23/07/22 03:08 PM
3

I'm lucky too. My parents said they just couldn't afford it at the time. .. thank goodness for right budgets.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 03:06 PM
3

Our midwife displayed visible relief when we answered no to the "are you going to circumcise" question. She said that's one thing where she can't keep her opinion to herself.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 03:05 PM
2

No, they're an entirely different threat, just as "sex offender" gives the wrong idea about public urination, it also gives the wrong idea about false accusations. I have issues with public registries for released individuals (either keep them in jail or let them move on) but I actually could get behind a "barratry registry" that is maybe not public, but definitely comes into play during police investigations.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 01:07 PM
3

You disputed that psychology is feminist dominated because feminists gripe about it being PATRIARCHY. I simply pointed out how feminists blame their own crap on PATRIARCHY all the time. If you want to know how feminist dominated the field of psychology is, listen to the prim reaper.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 11:35 AM
1

My wife had told me that if she is carrying a baby and she dies in a way that her body keeps functioning, maintain her corpse as long as possible for the health of the baby. We're not gonna write this down anywhere so the doctors would have to take my word for it. I'd say sperm extraction is far less invasive that keeping her entire body functioning artificially as an incubator. It's not like she can steal a quarter of his wages for the next 20 years by having his kid. I'm generally fine with th…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 05:32 AM
10

Not without "statutory" in front of it.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 05:08 AM
21

Assuming he wasn't killed.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 05:08 AM
3

I had a counselor say that my financial ruin from my prior marriage was my fault because I should have reigned in her spending and hospital hopping... yeah, so I could have been hit with financial abuse allegations.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 05:05 AM
8

You mean like how women getting custody is blamed on PATRIARCHY and "derided as inherently misogynistic" (citation, big red)... women getting default custody instead of men (and the subsequent invention of child support) is directly caused by the writings and actions of feminist author Caroline Norton. Yeah, feminists blame their own mistakes on patriarchy. This is why Karen Straughn created a series called "owning your shit" because feminists deny feminist culpability in everything feminism doe…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 05:01 AM
6

No. Feminism is engineered specifically to disguise narcissism as righteous indignation.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 04:50 AM
1

How can you think paternity fraud a serious offense? it is only a man's emotional investment, 5 years salary, it's not as severe as varying degrees of discomfort for 9 months sitting which you are free to sleep, earn money, get pedicures and continue to lead your life as you see fit.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 02:27 AM
-2

Even stupid MRAs are smarter than intelligent feminists. After all: we are machines dude, we are literal machines, we are talking point machines. we are impossible to fcking deal with. Especially like, epecially if there are a couple of us with good memory. Holy shit, they're fcked. Edit: Wow. No one listens to Honey Badger Radio?
/r/MensRights20/07/22 06:27 PM
1

Unpopular opinion, but I don't care to stop people from suicide, I only care to stop them from WANTING it... if I we fail to give them the desire to live, it should be criminal too make them keep living.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 06:20 PM
7

Nah. She has already thrown away too many opportunities that won't come again. She'll suffer far more learning that too late the misanthropic cult she subscribed has made her ruin her entire life. My goal is to minimize suffering, not rub it in. Let younger women come to that realization.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 06:17 PM
16

Good. Don't date. You're a strong independent woman who don't need no man. I know if I thought all women were malignant I wouldn't want to date them. Just knowing the ones who are get social and government support in their malignancy is nearly enough to make me go MGTOW. thankfully I married a woman who MOSTLY knows feminism is full of shit.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 03:10 PM
1

When speaking of a group generally, generalization is completely appropriate.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 10:48 AM
1

And if you are one of the rare women who can, in construction, pull your weight I'm sure you're welcome there. But if you can I'm also sure you'd begrudge parasitic quota fillers as much as (if not more than) the men.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 10:47 AM
7

Reported. Assuming that accurately depicts occurring rates is like assuming arrest rates accurately depict occurring rates. If the the cops won't arrest a women even if she servers the man's finger, but will arrest a man for slamming cabinet doors, your going to skew the results. Likewise when 1 sex reports "I felt like he might hit me" and the other doesn't even report objects being thrown at them.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 12:16 PM
15

I didn't say women are stupid. The fact that you are illiterate enough to interpreted it that way tells me that, if you're passing, your department follows feminist doctrines rather than scientific rigor. Your strawmaning says a lot about you and any educators you're finding success with.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 03:35 AM
11

And gays relationships involve vastly less violence than hetero relationships. It's almost as if the more women are involved the more violent it gets. Might have something to do with being taught that controlling your emotions is the evil patriarchy keeping you down promotes volatile behavior.. or it just be that women have more violent personalities.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 03:25 AM
13

Didn't say without exception. We're not talking about individuals, we're talking about statistics. And statistically men are bigger and stronger than women, and statistically women initiate more domestic violence than men. The fact that Venus Williams could turn Rick Moranis into a pretzel doesn't erase the fact that in aggregate men are bigger and stronger than women. As for the female brain being smarter... no. Studies show men deviate from the average more than women but the average are rough…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 03:18 AM
12

Actually, despite lesbian's best efforts to make up for it, men are abused MORE than women. Men are just more durable and women are weaker. Abusing with less success does not equal abusing less.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 02:54 AM
20

More than
/r/MensRights19/07/22 02:47 AM
1

Frankensteins "monster" did nothing wrong and was rejected by his creator. Then he did nothing wrong and was rejected by society. He literally saved a vulnerable family from a harsh winter... and was rejected when he revealed himself. All for immutable characteristics (he looked repellent, most incels start with innocent social awkwardness that makes them repellent). Only after ALL this ostricization did he ever harm anyone. He even begged Frankenstein to build him a mate with whom he would leav…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 02:20 AM
2

While working airport security I gave a flight attendant a compliment (I don't know, eyes or smile), she thanked me. . Her coworker: what about me? Me: what about you? Coworker: you gave her a compliment. Me: yes I did. Coworker: well, I'm just saying. Me: you're just saying what? . I really loved that exchange. It's really one of my favorite experiences with someone fishing for compliments. I would've happily missed out on the rest of that day's wages if I could've been a fly on the wall to lis…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 12:58 AM
1

As Hannah Wallen has said, patriarchy theory only differs from hitlers jew theory by who it targets.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 05:10 PM
3

cassie jaye, erin pizzey. the only exception is christina hoff sommers and even she is not considered feminist by feminists.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 04:19 AM
3

kinda hard to accurately gather stats on something which is defined out of existence.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 04:16 AM
1

sometimes saving face (or not shattering your own doublethink) requires doing the right thing. The prior redefinition was informed by feminist PHD Mary P Koss (the creator of the feminist 1/4 college rape statistic.) you could tell them how she denied male rape victims but that will just result in either denial or no-true-scottsmaning (or you being called misogynist) so just give them that name and let them research her themselves. I'd thank them for supporting the idea that "no means no" isn't …
/r/MensRights18/07/22 04:09 AM
2

I promise you the nazis made the same denial of their hatred of jews. Valerie Solanas was convicted of attempted murder but her "SCUM manifesto" is still feminist literature cited IN ACADEMIA... show me a group of Incels praising Eliot Rodger. I understand the crowd he was talking with started distancing even BEFORE his crime. And no. CNN slandering Incels through him don't count, that's called hearsay... I need to see THEM expressing support.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 10:36 PM
1

Never underestimate the power of feminist doublethink.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 10:09 PM
2

Your assertions are feminist conjecture, not facts. Your justification of hatred for a group largely comprised of neurodivergent individuals is enough to nearly justify the existence of the term "ableism". Inceldom isn't just about sex otherwise they could just go get a prostitute. It about acceptable and human connection, Sex is merely the peak indicator. And if you think Incels have a sense of entitlement, wait until you see the fat positivity movement trying to shame men for not being attract…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 10:09 PM
2

Inceldom is not an ideology. It's a situation homosapiens are ill-equipped to endure.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 09:29 PM
1

If that's what you read from me then don't bother reading Frankenstein. It's a little over your literacy level. Maybe try Clifford or green eggs and ham. They won't help you understand marginalized people but at least it wouldn't be more over your head than a satellite.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 09:23 PM
5

In theory it's possible for a woman to be an incel, but in practice your looking at 99%of women who might adopt the label are "shopping out of their price range". An incel would absolutely be with the female equivalent of himself, not generally true for a femcel.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:00 PM
17

Shoe too passionately hates people simply for having the attraction (note* her reaction to those who speak about non_offending), but I fully respect that she's gender neutral about it.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 06:38 PM
2

Yes. These pariahs who have generally developed in an environment of social ostracization do (in their "safe space") say things roughly as bad as what feminist thought leaders get to spew mainstream public without any censure. Again. I invite you to READ Mary Shelly's Frankenstein.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 06:34 PM
3

Inceldom the only "hate group" where none of its members WANT to be members. Your slander of the marginalized is bigotry.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:55 PM
2

Right. They should take their social ostracization like a pro and just accept loneliness rather than meeting with eachother so they can at least somewhat fill their biological need for socialization. When the norms seem you unworthy of social interaction you are not supposed to find a work around like interacting with others they have also unpersoned. /s Frankenstein didn't make the monster, social rejection did.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:53 PM
2

Wow. We have a massive Poe here. Even Parson didn't have this level of doublethink. You are literally using "incel" to try to insult anyone who thinks that feminists use "incel" as an insult.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:09 PM
3

Only Incels think feminists sling these as insults. You just said everyone who observes feminist behaviors is involuntarily celibate... that the only way to get laid is to not think it counts when feminists slander.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 04:19 PM
3

Yes, the first paragraph is good. But could anyone make sense of the rest of that article?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 03:26 PM
6

I don't identify as cis. I just accept the kindergarten cop definitions of boy and girl. Self identification has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:59 PM
1

I only use nazi for people whose academics can't distinguish their doctrines from a madlib of mein kampf... but I think that's not an unfair assessment.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:57 PM
4

Please tell me this was intended ironically.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:55 PM
4

Holy irony batman. please, I'm begging you, tell me we all just got Poed!
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:54 PM
1

Read Mary Shelly's Frankenstein. It's an instruction book on how to create a monster... which is why it totally glosses over hour Dr Frankenstein built the creature and focuses on the social interactions the creature experienced.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:51 PM
3

It's a valid term, people who use it maliciously prove themselves incapable of intellectual discussion. When they use it against me I don't refute but instead ask them "are you trying to shame me based on a perceived lack of sexual conquest? Isn't that supposed to be a part of 'toxic masculinity' you're perpetuating in you attempted insult here?"
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:45 PM
9

after 20 years of loyalty ihaven't bought Gillette since Kim Gheregs commercial. Dr squatch commercials don't bug me.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 06:17 AM
2

Central no. But still leadership. Academics and lobbyists lead feminism and anyone who takes the name feminist is expressing support for them regardless of their private individual beliefs. Yes, there's a lot of pain and anger in men's rights forums, but mostly facts. If you're interpreting my words as such then you are projecting it.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:15 AM
2

Kinda like nazis who don't support eradication of jews. By taking the name you support the actions of the leadership even if in small irrelevant conversations you don't promote the hate.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:54 PM
1

Yes. The fact that even shitty mothers can often maintain custody over decent fathers does skew the statistics.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:48 PM
1

It wasn't we who spread the KAM hashtag.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:45 PM
2

Men get custody when they fight for it because on the advice of their lawyer they rarely fight a lost cause. So yes, Like 80% of Crack head women lose custody to boyscout ex husband's. Invert which is the Crack head and there's essentially 0% chance.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:39 PM
10

Next you should learn about real Incels and think about the kind of psychological damage being broadly rejected by everyone causes in a social species like homosapiens. Actually, go read Mary Shelly's Frankenstein, that's really the first literary exploration into incel psychology. doctor Frankenstein's creation want born a monster, even being rejected by his creator didn't make him a monster. It took all of society (including those he served) rejecting him before he broke and became a monster.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 05:11 PM
8

You're buying the feminist slander of Incels.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 05:02 PM
6

"there are a substantial group of people who use the title ‘feminist’ who are man-hating bigots." yes, and they are the professors, researchers, and lobbyists. it is entirely possible to call ones self a nazi and donate to the nazi party while not hating jews... but you can't do those things without hurting jews. {oh, you're proving godwins law} it isn't MRA's fault that even FEMINIST ACADEMICS can not distinguish their conjecture from mein kampf. I know lots of good people who think themselves …
/r/MensRights16/07/22 04:13 PM
1

feminism is at it's core, female supremacist. any congregation of feminists will create a harmonic to reinforce their female supremacy and feminists will never see it. nor will they see that society at large is both constructedly and inherently gynocentric. hell, they twist the erasure of weremens gendered identity until they contributed to society while wifmen maintained gendered identity regardless in the evolution of language to be a devaluing of women despite it being the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 03:39 PM
0

yes, I have heard of grooming. and yes I agree it should be illegal. willingness IS the benchmark for "consent". stop thinking consent is some mystical thing that only applies to sex. when you go to the airport you imply consent to be searched. cops may ask for consent to search your car. consent is not some magical power you evolve on your 18th birthday, it is literally agreeing to something. if consent happened, it was not rape. rape is not the first level of "wrong" acts.... in my book it is …
/r/MensRights16/07/22 03:13 PM
1

Yes, it's being called rape. And "not literally" is in the dictionary definitions for "literally". Just because it's agreed doesn't make it right. Why am I so invested in this? Because language needs to MEAN something. When people hear the word "rape" violent force comes to mind. You wouldn't call a slap to the face attempted murder... the fact is that someone who is stupid enough to let themselves be seduced by a minor isn't a fraction of the threat is someone who forces themselves on another p…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 01:50 PM
1

I personally know 2 "older survivors" and when they speak of childhood trauma, they speak of their parents efforts to STOP them from seeking these relationships. One (when we were catching up in our 30s) broke down crying, not over "what happened to her", but because she felt guilty over her parents and the government destroying the man's life. So no, I'll not take the curated parade assembled by people who don't differentiate Joseph Rosenbaum (or the gender swap) from Mary Kay Leturneau (or the…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 01:11 PM
-2

Was it "consentual sex" when a close acquaintance (peer) of mine had sex with much older men when we were teens? Yes. She freaking sought them out on "live links" (pre internet tinder). Just because I reject how society and feminism have watered down the word rape doesn't mean I think consentual sex with minors should be legal. Stop letting feminism bastardize the language.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 12:23 AM
-3

Yes, I do say the same when the genders are reversed. In fact the 2 peers I was close enough to to be aware were both girls when they, as teens, sought out sexual relations with adults. Both speak of their childhood trauma being their parents (failed) efforts to stop them from getting the sex they actively sought. I fully support it being illegal, hell, i even support making simply encouraging teens to have sex with eachother illegal... but I can't support the lie that is calling it rape.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 12:16 AM
-11

Unpopular opinion here. Calling consentual sex rape, even when deligitimizing the consent is justified, diminishes the horror that is actual rape. Did she force him to have sex against his will or is society just denying the consent he illegally gave?
/r/MensRights15/07/22 09:32 PM
-4

Stop lying to yourself. I've only heard profetucide people bring up good, the Bible or religion in the discussion. Just because the person you're arguing with is religious doesn't make their argument religious.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:45 AM
10

Gonna have to buy a keyboard protector
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:41 AM
9

Because they're males
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:37 AM
2

And ice cream and all the other deserts and they still want to be considered sexy after living off that for years.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 05:24 PM
1

I think they're right, too the privileged, equality feels like oppression... which is why they always feel oppressed. So to counter this one must take their feelings out of it and compare on gender neutral metrics. Why has the right to genital integrity? Who has the right to choose NOT to become Parent? Who has the right to vote without signing up for the draft? Who has default custody in divorce? Who has an easier time getting a conviction of the other? Who, when convicted, receives a lesser pu…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 05:23 PM
1

Your responsibility and your problem are 2 different things. A crime victim isn't responsible for their attackers actions but they are certainly better off preventing them.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:08 PM
1

I will say it was mutually rude situation. If the floor is wide open, follow urinal rules.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:05 PM
2

Publicly denounce feminism... most particularly the lies and revisionist history of feminism.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:47 PM
11

virgin shaming is something sluts do to make themselves feel better.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 03:24 AM
1

Gotcha. So every nation which drafts only men into their military and fire brigades and only deputizes men is doing so to oppress women, rather than because they value women too much to utilize them so disposably Service to one's community is a duty, an obligation, not a right. The "priesthood" as the Mormons understand it is a service. They literally can't even give themselves blessings.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 07:43 AM
3

If someone wants or needs the freedom to walk away just because they want to, she shouldn't get married! That's what marriage is! A commitment! It's a VOW! Not "to boredom do you part"
/r/MensRights09/07/22 10:24 PM
16

Virtually all lynching was for women. Even white men got lynched.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 09:15 PM
1

If you don't know why, you've not been paying attention to this sub.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 12:46 PM
2

No periods. Bone density. Being able to build a traditional family without having to be with a dude.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 04:18 AM
1

They already can. It's called child support.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 03:16 AM
2

Because feminists have a department in every college indoctrination more than even the catholic church ever hoped to.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:56 AM
14

Hillarity Goddamned Clinton
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:54 AM
1

Wooshed me too
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:48 PM
6

Wooshed me too.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:38 PM
3

Objectivity is a vice in the religion of feminist and partiality a virtue. No joke.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:59 AM
3

Why do feminists (and everyone) hate female genital mutilation?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:17 PM
2

Miso(gyny) ist (as in racist, sexist), phobe (as in xenophobe, homophobe, transphobe).. just lump them all into one word since they all just mean "you're a thought criminal who dares violate my orthodoxy" and embrace it.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 11:39 AM
2

Facts and figures back up the badguy... don't worry, I have SHAMING HIM FOR HIS (as i wildly guess) LACK OF SEXUAL CONQUEST to ensure the victory. Yeah... isn't that supposed to be part of TOXIC MASCULINITY?
/r/MensRights04/07/22 11:05 AM
23

Except my statement has statistical support. Yours is just an empty claim.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 08:06 AM
2

Misoistaphobe.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 07:54 AM
23

Most divorce are initiated by women. Most fathers do not leave voluntarily. Few have my good fortune to be in a position to take sole custody.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 07:50 AM
29

Yes, ted bundy was very nice. Most serial killers and mass shooters come from single mother households.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 07:48 AM
1

Funny. That "because my enemy rejects the principles I claim to hold means I don't have to follow them either" mindset is the same way feminist justify their misbehavior
/r/MensRights03/07/22 03:33 PM
25

When the vast majority of all violence is against men, you're retarded to think only violence against women is because they're women but violence against men just happens to happen more often.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 03:28 PM
5

"I am funny you @%*&#&" no, you're not. You're not even making your own choir laugh, you're making them clap. That's called clapper, not laughter.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 03:34 PM
5

I just told my wife the other day "you can't expect help from the person you're lashing out at." She calmed down fairly quickly after that.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 03:28 PM
3

I prefer they do it. Just tells me I'm not interested. Much better than when they try to be subtle about it.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 03:23 PM
3

My sons high school had such a club... but it wasn't a study group, it was a programming class!
/r/MensRights02/07/22 03:23 PM
1

Constructing buildings housing leftists and leftist companies? Yes. But the only way I want to see more than 10% female workers constructing a building that matters to me is if the construction company is a passionate family business and nearly all the women are daughters in the family. A healthier Hannah Wallen would be an amazing asset to any construction crew, but barring a big family operation, you'll never get over 10% women without lowering the bar for the women because the company is abou…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 03:01 PM
1

Bruh. The people who make those claims are the ones promoting laws to allow 9th month elective abortion. I literally watched Virginia governor Ralph Northam discuss POST BIRTH ABORTION. You'll have to forgive me for neither taking your word for it, nor for finding those evil conservative misrepresentations as bad as the due date abortions the left are fighting for (and have legalized in 7 states) I'll not take my education from a media who believed Jussie Smollette and still has people siding wi…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 04:50 AM
-7

Yes. I did. Did you fight for men's choice not to be fathers? No? Then your profetucide, not prochoice.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 12:20 AM
1

Evening the playing field may be the icing on the cake, but acting that that is why is oversimplification. Some people give a shit about unborn babies...
/r/MensRights01/07/22 12:18 AM
3

I think neither spouse should be kept in the dark. Secretly getting sterilized should be a violation of the marriage contract... then again, marriage is the least enforced contract
/r/MensRights01/07/22 12:14 AM
1

"Respect the diversity of tactics". Not really, but the fact that we don't unironically say things like that alone is enough to keep us from becoming like any of the feminist subs.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 12:08 AM
3

The (knowing) side action is trashy, but they're not an oath breaker. An unfaithful spouse is always worse than the so called home wrecker because the unfaithful spouse is the actual home wrecker. Granted these feminists are wrong for thinking the side action bears no blame, but it's equally wrong to assign the side action the lions share of the blame.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:15 PM
9

Feminists don't do dirty work. They'll have to find a man to do it for them.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:26 AM
3

Mega thread? Sounds more like a post it note
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:25 AM
2

If the morality were just mine, society wouldn't have to double euphemize it. You're using "choice" a a euphemism for abortion, and abortion itself is a euphemism for fetucide. I don't euphemize insecticide, herbicide or pesticide, yet feminist used Latin for "miscarriage" (which is a loss, not a choice) as the root for their substitute for fetucide. Why is "choice" a euphemism? Because they ONLY apply it to the topic of fetucide. I'm very much prochoice when it comes to gun ownership, I'm pro c…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:52 AM
2

As long as they're polite, I don't mind feminist missionaries coming here. I can even respect this one's "pretend I'm one of them" approach as it was trying to "deradicalize" me. If they have enough of those conversations they could eventually learn that their religion is the radical one and the way they've been trained to perceive us is false. What pisses me of about this is, you learn from history, by deleting their history to avoid being banned from their home subs, they will never see how it…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:09 PM
11

No. That use of a pronoun follows a clearly identified noun. Look back to the beginning of the comment to see what group is being discussed.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:01 PM
15

I think you misread that. Why would you think I designated this evil as inherent to women? I did not mention women nor any synonym for them.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 06:42 PM
0

if it is not a baby or alive at conception then the man has no part in making a living baby so child support for never agreed to children is unfounded because she made the baby all on her own.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:37 PM
0

i am vocal. i speak out in support of the vulnerable... the unborn
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:31 PM
1

Your ignorance and projection are astoundingly bigoted.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:00 AM
14

Say "I'll amputate my foreskin when you get the beef curtains trimmed". I wouldn't want to get with a woman who wants me to do that. Think of it like the sex strike... those you don't want to mate with are self selecting out. My being intact has never been a deal breaker.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:44 PM
34

It hurts as a baby too. If you want it, go get it. Don't bemoan that your parents didn't force it on you. That's some seriously lack of agency you're presenting here.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:13 PM
3

Is almost as if white men are the least likely to be willing to "impose" on others. Certainly feminists are happy to impose.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:54 AM
4

Didn't say that. The constitution doesn't authorize fetucide. Until the federal legislature creates a law authorizing fetucide the federal court system can't legally protect a woman's privilege to fetucide. Individual state legislatures CAN make laws that don't violate federal laws,
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:50 AM
4

Less feminists reproducing AND fewer fetucides... its a win win. The only people who lose are Chads and fools who married feminists. Everyone else either wasn't getting laid anyway (slight exaggeration) or has a wife who isn't participating.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:33 AM
12

Those "laws" were never laws. That's the problem. They were bench legislation which is a violation of America's separation of powers. All the Supreme Court has done is Said "this is something that must go through the legislature"
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:27 AM
1

Please, show me any prolife leader (politician or other prominent figure) who has suggested doing any of the shit you just proposed. I anticipate your link. I can show you an elected GOVERNOR suggesting post birth abortion! I can also show you 7 states which AT PRESENT allow killing a viable full term AS IT IS BEING BORN.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:12 AM
1

I've run into that with options on polls.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 07:57 PM
3

This sounds like something that never happened... a feminist shut up after her gargantuan bias is pointed out? You'll have to forgive my skepticism... that's like feminists acknowledging the white feather campaign.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:39 PM
4

I can't take what back? The fact that you think I'm whinging in pain rather than calling out your unsupported, non sequitur, ad hominem violation of feminist standards doesn't mean you stuck a nerve. it means you're retort is so unsupported that it's not even worth disputing. And no, I don't think I "showed you", the fact that you call your fallacy a "Scotts thing" means you've seen nothing... and the fact that you've chosen not to look it up proves yes, you are "StUpId"... because you embrace y…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 12:29 PM
0

No need to get defensive... there is a reason editing exists, so we can correct our mistakes rather than continuing to spread them to others. While it might seem insincere, I do genuinely thank you. I've seen "whataboutism" accusations used to defend hypocrisy so much that I didn't think it had any valid use... but you've provided an example for me to think about as a possible valid use of that term. It is hard to correct the poor use of a term when I can't explain the correct use of it.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:37 AM
8

Are you trying to body shame me? Yeah, thanks for illustrating so effectively how well feminists live up to the standards they condemn society for falling short of. Of course a feminist would have no idea what the no_true_scottsman fallacy is, that would require they study logic... and logic is part of PATRIARCHY. Where have I displayed any emotion? You're projecting.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 06:45 AM
10

The difference is "feminism forever" is the mindset of feminists. MRAs would love to say "mission accomplished, time to close up shop"
/r/MensRights27/06/22 06:21 AM
9

You coffee shop feminists need to stop thinking you can no_true_scottsman feminist academic and political leadership. THEY are your priests, THEY are the source of all your doctrines.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 06:18 AM
5

Don't disagree there.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:51 AM
1

In a violent incident, I don't blame the cops for detaining everyone involved, as long as they purposely protect everyone they detain, detaining both sides helps control the situation. If they drove him away against his will that's a problem, but the only thing I see wrong in this video is how many of her charges were dropped (and the fact that her conviction will be expunged) And you're not the only one to say arrested, OP did too so I want to know if he made the same mistake or is there info f…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:48 AM
0

Where did the "he was arrested" come from. I watched the video and he was clearly detained, but I saw nothing about him being arrested.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:43 AM
0

He was detained. Where did you get the claim that he was arrested? I agree it's bullshit that most he charges were dropped but if we misrepresent we're no better than feminists. Detained doesn't equal arrested.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:41 AM
16

Equality
/r/MensRights26/06/22 03:34 PM
4

I'm pulling for you. We're all in this together.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 03:32 PM
4

More importantly, it's not about choice.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 03:30 PM
8

I'm not silent. I'm openly telling prolife women they don't have to silently take profetucide women's abuse.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 03:29 PM
1

What "easy" evidence proves it was not consentual?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:06 AM
3

Rvw didn't make abortion legal, it declared that states couldn't make it illegal. The laws on fetucide varied from state to state before, and they will now. Maybe this will keep Californians from voting California laws into Texas by scaring them to stay in California.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:04 AM
3

No. Even in their superior position, their doctrines require they take the title of victim.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 04:57 AM
1

holy incoherence batman. come back when you have an argument.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:57 PM
1

And abortion and a miscarriage look the same 99% of the time. so fetucide must be legal because it is hard to differentiate it from miscarriage? so I guess that means we need to make rape legal since rape, consensual sex, and false accusation "look the same 99% of the time?" I think that is ridiculous, but as long as you are consistent.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:33 PM
26

To the privileged, equality feels like oppression.... or so they've said to me.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:37 AM
0

(Assuming you MEANT to say 14th) That's a crazy stretch that applies just as well to domestic violence, FGM, and infanticide. If I lure someone into my bedroom, my right to privacy does NOT let me kill them. This is why that law was overturned. Because it was unsupported by the law they claimed to be acting under. It was bench legislation and anyone who says otherwise is a liar.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:29 AM
4

it was overturned because the courts job is to interpret the law, there is no federal law that gives women the right to fetucide. if you have a problem with that take it up with the legislature.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:09 AM
2

apply that same logic to women. MYSOGGYKNEE!!!!!!
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:07 AM
3

they aren't. they've been nonexistent since forever.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:06 AM
5

right, we need to know our place. if women feel upset we must sit down and shut up. that would never lead to any sort of abuse, /s
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:05 AM
2

stop notruescottsmaning feminist leadership
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:59 AM
7

Where were these harpies during the push for vaccine mandates?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 12:39 AM
3

I don't support a man's right to infanticide... why would I support a woman's?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 12:24 AM
0

If what you say is true, then we are in agreement that the law can stipulate that late term abortion requires life threatening medical need and "elective"is to be illegal.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 03:26 PM
0

Were that the case they wouldn't need to make it electively legal. Killing a person in self defense doesn't require making killing a person always legal.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 02:44 PM
2

https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx Interesting hours your source regroups it. "Legal in some cases" means illegal in some... if you don't support 9th month abortion on demand, feminism only counts you as "prochoice" when using you to prove that you are pro choice.... when discussing what is acceptable, feminism calls that 'evil prolife trying to control women's bodies'.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 12:25 PM
-17

Obviously since feminism makes opposing fetucide a cardinal sin and a small majority of women are pro life
/r/MensRights20/06/22 05:44 PM
3

Nope. I ignore snapchat
/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:59 PM
1

I'm pretty sure it was changed in policy in 2013. Not actually overcoming the burden of proof is a different story, but the US at least theoretically recognized women raping men now.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:48 PM
10

You're lucky she didn't fetucide you
/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:46 PM
7

No. UK law only allows for men to be perpetrators. Us law was that was until the last decade.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:44 PM
8

It's not an implication. It's a declaration.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:41 PM
3

They do if it is mutual. But if she's being a starfish, yeah, foreplay is boring as hell.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 07:24 PM
1

Whether we are are dumb as you allege doesn't negate the fact that we are more productive and that our excess productivity is the only reason your light switches work and your grocery stores are stocked.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 08:17 PM
0

Most those states were false before they were outdated, and the ones that were not were orphaned.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 04:36 PM
2

I've met several... unfortunately they're too brainwashed to listen to follow the example of Cassie Jaye. It is possible to believe in equality and be filled at the same time. Humans generally suck at overcoming mental short cuts. And when all their shortcuts rebuild eachother it's even harder because as you tear down a second one, the first one you destroyed is being restored. But if you tear them all down at once you'll shock them into active resistance.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 03:39 PM
3

But if they do that, the wonderful loving embrace of equality that is every feminist sub will ban them for engaging in intellectual intercourse here in our leper colony.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 03:25 PM
5

It's not that the proudboys aren't "real" MRAs, they AREN'T MRAs at all. They're a macho fraternity who openly stands up against leftist terrorism. Associating them with us is like associating a group traveling from Vancouver BC to New York NY with a group traveling Olympia WA to Washington DC. Even though they have most of I 90 in common (feminism is a load of horse manure), how they get there and where they're going with it are completely unrelated.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 03:21 PM
5

Right. When you take on you the name of an organization, you declare that that organizations leadership represents you (at least roughly)
/r/MensRights18/06/22 03:08 PM
5

The extreme ones are THE LEADERSHIP, the academics and lobbyists. The worst the MRM has are Terrence Popp (Gaston incarnate) and Stephan Molyneux (so "libertarian" he comes across as an anarchist cultist). As the WORST the MRM has to offer, they are both more sensible than the average feminist professor.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 03:06 PM
19

I once nailed a feminist professor down in a way that even she couldn't not see her hypocrisy... to such she responded "aren't we all hypocrites?" No, no we aren't all hypocrites. We might all have little hypocrisies thatwe fail to see, but upon learning them, especially ones this glaring, we correct them, not embrace them.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 02:54 PM
1

As women get subjected to alimony more, alimony is being phased out. If you want injustice to end, make the injustice happen to women as much as men. Then people will cease to tolerate it. That said, I don't agree that the possibility of a draft is bad, only when the draft is abused for an unjust war. Hence signing up for it is only unjust in 2 situations, 1: it violates equality, 2 it is used for an offensive war.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 05:58 PM
1

Ok, how about only people wanting to vote, get government jobs, or receive federal aid must sign up for the draft? That's LESS punishment for not signing up than men currently face. I'd say being drafted is FAR WORSE than signing up for the draft... if initiating a draft meant drafting women... they would do EVERYTHING POSSIBLE to avoid using it (and you know it) , so by signing everyone up for the draft we add massive social pressure to prevent implementation. Hence, NOT WORSE.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:27 PM
1

Modern humans are physically pathetic compared to prehistoric ones... because weak prehistoric humans died.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 11:49 AM
1

How do women who extract child support from a man who never agreed to raise children together claim to be equal? It's an empty claim.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 11:40 AM
1

No, he's different because he expects men to buy their privilege, feminists expect women to be given their privilege for free.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:31 AM
2

No, it really isn't. Women will go into hiding. "A caveman's weapon to defend his home is a spear. A cavewoman's weapon to defend her home is a cave man.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:29 AM
7

No one has suggested we draft more, only that we draft equally. Instead of drafting 100 men, draft 50 men and 50 women.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:26 AM
3

If we couldn't discriminate based on sex, you can bet the draft would end pretty quick
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:25 AM
6

that feminism isn't a religion.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:32 AM
2

I too hate it when people confuse declarations for implications.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 01:50 PM
3

If you were married to amber you'd be an addict too
/r/MensRights13/06/22 01:49 PM
2

No one said he's a Saint. He's an imperfect victim
/r/MensRights13/06/22 01:47 PM
-3

Hmm. That society was built by men. That's about it really
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:15 PM
3

/ s
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:04 PM
3

I'd hang with you.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:04 PM
6

Men make that air pollution providing for women's consumption.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:03 PM
8

It's less valid than saying men created society so women can't complain because they didn't participate enough in the construction.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 03:41 PM
2

Yes. Which is why I put it in quotes.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 08:43 PM
3

Assigning women the responsibility to stop feminists is like feminism assigning men the responsibility to stop rapists.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 11:43 AM
4

I completely agree. It's one thing when women don't object to feminist misandry... women don't actively give feminists permission to speak for them and as such aren't directly responsible to shut feminist misandry down. It is another thing entirely for the "real feminists" to not object to feminist misandry because by taking the name feminism upon themselves they are consenting to allow feminist leadership to speak on their behalf.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 02:22 AM
1

It is VERY appropriate that men's day is also toilet day... men are endlessly taking care of women's shit.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 02:18 AM
7

yes, but one side gets their frustration from unbiased evidence.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 10:51 PM
3

when we imply "all" it's usually because we're discussing doctrines of feminism. feminists who no_true_scottsman misandrist feminists do not realize it is THEY who are not the true feminists... and that all the beliefs that lead them to think feminism is a push for equality are derived from lies manufactured by the misandrists who hold all leadership positions within feminism (political and academia)
/r/MensRights08/06/22 10:50 PM
22

Despite being married with child#4 on the way, I don't dispute when they accuse me off being an incel. I merely ask "Are you trying to shame me for a lack of sexual conquest? Isn't that part of "toxic masculinity" you're perpetuating there?" My goal in talking to feminists isn't to convince them to agree with me, but to show them they disagree with themselves.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:58 AM
6

By disproportionate he means that the proper proportion of risk for men to face is 100% and women 0%
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:46 AM
2

It's progress.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:34 AM
1

No. That's a summary, not a study. That expresses the reality of the LONG AND REPEATEDLY debunked wage gap. The study itself declared that it just averaged full time working men and full time working women. It doesn't control for job hazards, desirability, or hours. Frankly, I am shocked the earnings gap isn't wider based solely on hours worked.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 08:28 PM
6

Feminism owns the media. No other way to explain this https://youtu.be/IFb_AERKha8
/r/MensRights07/06/22 11:40 AM
9

men bought the "right" to vote by social responsibilities such as conscription. women got the right to vote just for asking long enough. even today, in violation of the 14th amendment, only men MUST sign up for selective service. the first and second acts of feminism actually illustrate this perfectly. caroline norton wrote the tender years doctrine taking the right to default custody in a divorce from the man and giving it to the woman (sure it is not equality, but there's something to be said …
/r/MensRights07/06/22 03:06 AM
8

harvey weinstein exchanged jobs for sexual favors. exchanging sex doesn't make you a victim, it makes you a prostitute. amber heard is only facing the music for slander... someone destroying your livelihood does make you a victim. amber heard is NOT facing consequences for her domestic violence (neither against johnny nor tasha) someone who is subjected to domestic violence is a victim. there is a BIG DIFFERENCE between a someone whose "victims" agreed to be "victims" as part of a disgusting tra…
/r/AntiFeminists07/06/22 02:54 AM
42

the media lies to you. constantly.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:47 AM
10

most of us believe that equal rights require equal responsibilities and the feminism has increased women's rights far beyond women's responsibilities. I would argue that the rights feminism has secured for women exceed even the responsibilities that men have. we generally believe feminist leadership (academia and lobby groups) manufacture more lies than richard nixon and are more hypocritical than the Disney villain Frolo. watch the red pill by cassie jaye. wonderful documentary from an exfemini…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:33 AM
20

That 350k came from Elon musk
/r/MensRights06/06/22 01:44 PM
1

Here is some of it. https://aliesq.medium.com/extensive-research-women-initiate-domestic-violence-more-than-men-men-under-report-it-3bbaa4fbec9d
/r/AntiFeminists06/06/22 11:31 AM
4

some of the best MRAs are women. look up the honey badger brigade.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 11:06 PM
5

if we couldn't take rejection the species would've gone extinct.
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 05:54 PM
1

wild accusations are proof... but only when coming from women against men. apparently.
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 05:52 PM
8

actually, even with our superior physicality, women initiate 2/3rds of reciprocal domestic violence and perpetrate 2/3rds of unilateral DV... when feminists counter with the greater damage done by male abusers, I can't help but quote Andre the giant "it's not my fault being the biggest and the strongest, I don't even exercise."
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 05:50 PM
-3

potentially darwining themselves for safety. I'd be noncommittal MGTOW if my wife ever dies on me but I don't think I'd go that way if I didn't already have children.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 05:43 PM
2

I didn't express an opinion that would involve agreement or disagreement. I just described and compared this to past of English history.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 04:13 AM
4

The most perfect application of that Heath Ledger joker meme
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:41 PM
3

Misoistaphobe.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:39 PM
1

That's just "violence". Kinda like how when "wifmen" maintained their unique classification but "weremen" had to actually distinguish themselves (eg huntsman, fireman, etc) to not be just "man".
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:38 PM
12

That sounds like something he'd coin. Karen would likely be more blunt and say we're seen as ATM machines. Nothing against Warren but I definitely like Karen better.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:30 PM
3

I have a feminist friend who overtly and sincerely treats Jason Momoa like Pamela Anderson was treated 20 years ago Though generally, while men are more likely to reduce women to sexual value, women are more likely to reduce men to financial value. Don't let them fool you, when they complain about a 'lack of ambition', it's just a self denial admission that is about the money.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:26 PM
10

Your new to this planet aren't you?
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:21 PM
2

Right. A home maker as competent as June Cleaver or Laura Petre is working more than full time... but these days, SAHMs can't even keep house like Rosanne Conner (who worked full time)
/r/MensRights03/06/22 11:51 PM
1

Because if men worked as little as women, society would fall apart.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 11:47 PM
1

What about the gender work gap? https://youtu.be/GLzTpj7DZUA
/r/MensRights03/06/22 10:58 PM
9

Because responsibility is for men. Duh.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 11:40 AM
7

I like telling the same thing to land whales... for some reason feminists don't approve of that as much.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:45 AM
1

Yeah, but they only want rights, not responsibilities.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 08:09 PM
8

Rosie the riveter quit in weeks. The job was too hard and dangerous for her. Perfect depiction of all waves of feminism.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 05:43 PM
1

You have the right to seek justice. That right isn't without cost.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 07:18 PM
2

Women don't typically have any shit to give 50%of
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:49 PM
9

Perfect example of the different thresholds for unacceptable behavior.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 04:55 PM
0

Who is downvoting this?
/r/MensRights31/05/22 03:09 AM
7

Yes. They were treated like men.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 03:08 AM
2

Not quite as rare as you'd think. But certainly less common than men (and children when they worked factories)
/r/MensRights31/05/22 03:05 AM
4

Nuclear plants melting down, sewage systems backing up, garbage in the streets no power.... minus the nuclear meltdowns it's just like LA
/r/MensRights31/05/22 12:16 AM
1

Thank you very much. I had found that in Google but failed to scroll down far enough.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 06:11 PM
5

Obstacles like their lower work ethic?
/r/MensRights30/05/22 01:31 PM
1

Only a little.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 02:57 AM
1

Got a link?
/r/MensRights30/05/22 02:50 AM
4

And in the UK, universal men's suffrage (that happened because men were dying in war) only predates universal women's suffrage (that happened because women threw temper tantrums) by 3 years.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:33 AM
2

Men weren't either. A whole new church was created because the old church wouldn't let the KING get a divorce.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:31 AM
5

Ah, facts. As water is too the wicked witch, truth is to feminists.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:29 AM
2

I, I have no need for such a tattoo, I speak out against feminism and for men's rights everywhere, not just reddit. And to be clear, no one in men's rights pages were drawn in, overcoming or biologists and social gynocentric programming takes a push. It's by setting the bullshit of feminism that people find their way here. The hypocritical words and actions of feminist academics, lobbyists and other such leaders (along with the current state of laws in the western world) has shocked us out of th…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:18 AM
3

It is very much a red flag... the pages who ban people for dissent (or a currently described, interacting on pages where dissent is common) are the toxic ones. They have an echo chamber and think that is harmony.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:13 AM
2

What feminists like you fail to grasp, is that feminism isn't a synonym for women. Hating your misanthropic cult does not equal hating women.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:10 AM
2

You may feel shame over your lack of pussy, but I honestly regret most that I've gotten. further more name calling doesn't work on me, if was too change my screen name, I'd go by "misoistaphobe" so we could bypass wasting time on your baseless insults, calling me an incel wouldn't work even if it was true.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:08 AM
3

Go back to your feminist reddit before they excommunicate you for commenting here.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:01 AM
5

Called it.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:59 AM
7

No men haven't. Men got the vote because they DID fight tooth and nail for society TO SURVIVE. Feminists only fight when men have already made it safe and only to get themselves what they want.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:55 AM
2

And saying they are oppressed for their sex is delusional and lies.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:53 AM
1

So, since feminism is an "equal rights movement" why have they not closed up shop declaring "mission accomplished"? What right do men have that women don't? What mission still remains for feminists in the United States? Ending all crimes against women? Sorry, that's not equality as women are already the minority victims of crime.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:52 AM
2

The best stats feminists ever touch are orphaned... most are bullshit to begin with.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:47 AM
5

Your understanding of history is flawed. No wonder you're an incel, you drank the feminist koolaid and no one likes male feminists... ESPECIALLY feminists.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:45 AM
4

If 8 percent proven false means false accusations are rare, then 5%proven true means rape is more rare than false accusations.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:22 AM
-2

Why did you have dog shit in you? You should thank her.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 05:33 PM
1

"The soft bigotry of lowered expectations"
/r/MensRights28/05/22 01:04 PM
3

These 2 comments are the best summary of patriarchy theory ever.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 12:10 PM
10

Nah, she's used to it considering all the absolute shit that comes out of her mouth.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 12:02 PM
6

Thank you for the /s. I just feel victim to Poe's law
/r/MensRights27/05/22 11:56 AM
2

Expeliarmus?
/r/MensRights27/05/22 11:53 AM
5

LOL. My consent do doesn't count because I thought the sex so would be more "sex".
/r/MensRights26/05/22 03:36 PM
3

Imagine being so confident that you're untouchable.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 03:28 AM
1

She's an Atlantean warrior who balls with aquaman. You think Brass knuckles are gonna cut it?
/r/MensRights25/05/22 11:16 PM
2

Found one
/r/MensRights25/05/22 04:03 PM
3

People aren't drawn into men's rights advocacy. They're pushed. Whether they see it consciously or not, it's the hateful actions of feminists that shock or minds enough to overcome both gynocentric nature and social programming. Welcome to the dark side.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 03:29 PM
7

Because it doesn't count when the left agrees with it.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 03:21 PM
2

Not enough
/r/MensRights25/05/22 01:39 AM
63

That is one massive erection. Might have been the biggest erection in the world at the time.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 01:38 AM
5

Quite well because ATM their ridicule is baseless. If we start gate keeping we validate their ridicule.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 11:51 AM
5

Tools for public wellbeing are weapons to pretty women. Pay no attention to their childish insults especially when they're not forthright enough to admit they're just trying to insult you.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 11:49 AM
68

Amber said Depp was abused... just not anywhere she thought the public or courts would hear. Women aren't treated like liars, they're treated like accusers who are probably telling the truth. Men are treated like liars who might be telling a partial truth. Even still there are norms who can't see Johnny as much of a victim as they see Rhianna.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 11:34 AM
1

I think you're overreacting a bit but your final sentence is funny
/r/MensRights23/05/22 04:08 AM
-4

I see 2 pictures. One with Both facing camera in front of a water fall, and one nearly identical with him kissing her cheek as the only significant difference. Is the internet gaslighting us?
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:40 PM
-6

Him kissing her cheek?
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:15 PM
-7

You and me both.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 05:48 PM
2

I once dented a steel door with my fist because my (now ex) pisses me off. Let me guess, you think that was abusive? Keep reading Well either it turned her on or she was trying to utilize the law to further abuse me because within an hour she was trying to seduce me to "show just how committed to this marriage I am". What was the violation that caused me to vent on an innocent door? Sexting with cyber boyfriend #2 who she repeatedly claimed to have ended it with... a cyber boyfriend she was mani…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 04:30 PM
1

How much money do you think pirates 6 or fantastic beasts 3 are gonna make?
/r/MensRights21/05/22 04:09 PM
14

Pretty sad that most people think stealing victimhood from other women is worse than actually victimizing Johnny. https://www.reddit.com/r/polls/comments/uk2xtz/which_of_these_offenses_is_the_worst/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:29 PM
0

So, admitting to assault in court is the only way someone can be "toxic as hell"? You got issues dude. Your joke was completely uncreative and generic... probably a reapplication of one you heard about any given politician. If you want to make a scatological joke about amber turd, taylor it to her, for instance "why doesN'T she take a long time in the bathroom? Because she craps in the bedroom." Sure it's still weak, but at least there's an iota of effort to relate it specifically to her and it'…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 07:30 PM
0

Jared Leto. Lots of toxic people keep their jobs. Even ones toxic on the job. Recasting for something outside of job performance is bad business. I'd certainly not recommend anyone give her a new role, but until it affects her job performance she should keep the roles she's already in. Canceling people is toxic femininity. Pretty sad for MRAs to embrace it.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 07:01 PM
0

You wanna charge her with the crimes of domestic violence and slander in accordance with the law? I support that. But I oppose all forms of mob justice.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 06:46 PM
2

and the cause
/r/MensRights18/05/22 06:05 PM
2

feminists seem to forget feminism does not equal women... then again, they also forget female human does equal women.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 06:05 PM
0

so even ants hate male feminists.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 06:03 PM
2

not enough men
/r/MensRights18/05/22 06:03 PM
0

how unfair that the females have to work so hard. this is why ants and bees need feminism to liberate them to work as little as male bees and ants.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 06:02 PM
1

then civil society must continue to let her live.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 05:36 PM
-1

I'll not be watching any movies for her presence, but neither will I avoid it. but recasting ruins movies. I am suggesting not ruining what she is already in and letting the bitches who love her still be her fans. that is what separates believing in consequences from believing in destroying people, when the left got pissed at Rossanne, those who did not like her made it so those who did like her were not able to continue to enjoy her craft... there were plenty who still liked her for the show to…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 05:24 PM
0

I understand our desire for vengeance, but I don't believe in cancel culture even when I agree the target is vile. It was wrong when they did it to Johnny, it'd be wrong to do it to her. All forms of extra judicial justice are wrong. Her relationship with Johnny is irrelevant to her role in aquaman.. her income from aquaman can be used to partially compensate Johnny for what he lost. If she's sent to jail and that gets in the way of her doing her job, that's one thing, but canceling her for anyt…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 01:24 PM
9

Not in law or even broad public, but my (now ex) wife used marital rape stories to manipulate her cyber boyfriends. Probably would've been different had she successfully seduced me "to show [me] just how committed to this marriage [she was]" that night I caught her cyber sexing #2. Unlike with white knight's, it's Hard to convince a court that your husband is raping you "on a regular basis" when you've not had sex in 3 months. 1 week later she ran away (2000 miles) with #3 and after trying to bl…
/r/MensRights16/05/22 10:35 AM
6

Didn't say it's not political. A: RvW is political and the r/unpopularopinion mods have SINCE made a thread on it. B: PERMANENT ban over it?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 10:49 PM
6

"As dictated". The wording allows for this "half" to include everyone who is a dollar short or a day late... even if due to temporary loss of employment. The parenting through divorce book (i was required to take a 1 day class) said 'more than 90% of child support payments assigned to women go unpaid' granted that was 15 years ago. Unless in divorce (or other such broken commitment to raise children together) as long as the woman has the choice of abortion, child support should be deemed slavery…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 02:58 PM
3

And then some
/r/MensRights14/05/22 02:48 PM
8

No. Most prochoicers are just profetucide, they don't want women to have the choice not to be vaccinated either.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 03:48 AM
4

The malignancy that feminists presume motivates prolifers is just a projection of their own mindset on others.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 03:47 AM
16

Tell that to Johnny Depp
/r/MensRights13/05/22 12:07 PM
-1

Is just one more thing that men are better at than women
/r/MensRights13/05/22 11:43 AM
4

Sure. Because women handle G forces so much better than men./s Do they think women are going to be desperate to see this movie?
/r/MensRights12/05/22 10:46 PM
1

No. If your talking catholic doctrines they're against all forms of birth control. I just hate condoms and don't trust anything medical with less than a decade of public record. I also want to raise children with my wife. Sex outside of commitment isn't worth all the risks. I actually have hopes for vasalgel but I'm not interested in being the test subject. The thing about hormonal birth control is for women, just convince her body she's pregnant, there is no natural condition in which male homo…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 02:58 PM
4

Freedom. Same reason tatoos and cosmetic surgery are allowed for adults. Now, please explain why it should not be allowed for adults?
/r/MensRights12/05/22 10:32 AM
2

I only KNOW of 3 bans that happened from me commenting on feminist subs and I was notified but I think I've come across a default ban a time or 2.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/22 04:45 AM
6

Who are the 33% saying it should not be allowed for adults?
/r/MensRights12/05/22 04:39 AM
2

Nope. If I'm not interested in having children with a woman I'm not having sex with her. Yes I have sex without the purpose being reproduction, but not without accepting the chance of a child.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 02:51 AM
1

Damn. That's a lot of opposition to it.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 02:43 AM
0

can you get a 9th month abortion everywhere?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 05:32 PM
1

feminism is a religion. force for all evil=patriarchy force for all good=feminism heretic=TERF original sin=maleness they hold tight to beliefs which are proven false such as the wage gap and I have even been told that family court does not have a female centric bias! feminism is quite possibly the worst religion on earth as it not only destroys more than most, but it builds absolutely NOTHING.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 05:29 PM
1

that's a pretty strong belief you have there. interestingly I find pro-choicers make such accusations when the pro-lifers have ONLY used secular arguments making the pro-choicer's bringing religion into the discussion text book ad hominem.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 05:23 PM
1

no kidding. this fool saying it's all about religion is as stupid as feminists saying it is men trying to control women's bodies when more women are pro-life than men.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 05:20 PM
1

do more religious people than nonreligious people value the innocent life of unborn babies? yes. but that does not make valuing the life of unborn babies religious. an unborn baby is less a burden than is a severely disabled down syndrome yet valuing their life seems universal. oops, sorry, like you I got distracted into abortion itself rather than RvW... RvW was a case of bench legislation and is an extreme violation of the 3 separate but equal branches of the US government. I am not a staunch …
/r/MensRights11/05/22 05:15 PM
5

Except Cosby was asked for the drugs
/r/MensRights10/05/22 07:35 PM
1

You understand American government better than any feminists. Whether abortion is legal or not is a matter for legislature, not the judiciary.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 07:02 PM
3

If you're not gonna tow the line you just gotta accept that you're a misoistaphobe.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 01:43 PM
2

because women spread it more than men. (or so my wife says)
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:26 AM
1

states or federal is refutable... the fact that RvW was legislation from the bench is completely unconstitutional is indisputable.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:20 AM
1

Straughan is the best Karen on earth.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:15 AM
38

SO CLOSE!
/r/MensRights09/05/22 05:51 PM
8

Oh, my bad. Guess I'm being a TERF again 😅
/r/MensRights09/05/22 05:01 PM
125

Why isn't it called "womenstruation"?
/r/MensRights08/05/22 08:14 PM
2

They're machiavellian. Otherwise they would not have encouraged bench legislation.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 08:44 AM
4

Nowhere near as far a reach as saying a human fetus isn't alive.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 03:09 AM
5

The man had no party in making the baby. He participated in making a zygote. She alone made it a baby.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 02:06 AM
6

A pregnancy is >60000 hours... but includes time spent sleeping and myriad other activities for the woman does for herself. 25% child support out of 40 hour work weeks (as if I don't typically work 50+) is >90000 100% dedicated body and mind to providing for the woman's choice not to adopt away the baby.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 06:47 PM
9

Consistency was never a feminist strong point
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/22 05:31 PM
9

Yes. All feminist women should make this commitment!
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/22 05:25 PM
1

I agree voluntary paternal surrender is the more accurate term... but this is about showing feminists their "fundamental human right" is so NOT a fundamental human right that no one has even CONSIDERED giving it to men.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 04:22 PM
2

Yeah... they'll take it as surrendering your rights without alleviating your responsibilities. Until the concept has gone mainstream, trying to mainstream the term is just putting another bullet in the feminist magazine
/r/MensRights07/05/22 04:20 PM
0

Right. Keep your nose out of other people's business... like domestic violence. As long as a DV victim chooses to stay in the relationship it's no one else's business because that's their choice right?
/r/MensRights07/05/22 04:17 PM
3

Then it's not the man's. A man made a zygote, not a baby. If a fetus isn't a child then charging child support from a man because he had sex is absurd.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 04:15 PM
1

Men are already held responsible for unwanted pregnancy. This just means states are allowed to decide if fetucide is a value they embrace. It means couples looking to adopt an infant won't have 3+year wait lists. And it means women will be less casual about sex. Win/win
/r/MensRights07/05/22 04:13 PM
3

The privileged oppressors. That also go to war to protect their chattle from death and they work themselves into an early grave for their victims.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 12:47 AM
110

My body earns every penny I have. If I owed child support I never agreed to, that would be a violation of my bodily autonomy and men are more likely to die earning the money to pay their child support than women are to die in child birth.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 04:16 PM
44

You misogynist. How can you not see that it is female oppression on the left and male privilege on the right. Damn poe. My statement is so absurd that I shouldn't have to put "/s" but I honestly can't be confident no feminist would say this.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 02:21 PM
9

Let them have it. I WANT feminists to proudly identify themselves.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 09:53 PM
1

Which rights?
/r/MensRights05/05/22 04:05 AM
1

sorry, I don't waste my energy on such pipe dreams. frankly I would rather they become more leftist allowing conservative states to become more conservative. concentrate populations so people who hate liberty are not making rules for people who value liberty
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:34 PM
1

I accept that some assault victims have some part... but how can you blame the victim of a false accusation? I mean, my ex literally asked for it telling me to hit her (she didn't get it)... I see no way for a person to figuratively ask for a false accusation and literally asking for it would be insanity.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:55 PM
2

Your right. One results in death and the other doesn't
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:52 PM
0

It's not crab mentality. I don't support convenience fetucide. I accept tolerating it as a consequence of democratic principles. Clearly once you remove their innate gynocentrism, most Americans oppose it COMPLETELY or there would be more serious discussion of voluntary paternal surrender (aka legal paper abortion).
/r/MensRights04/05/22 05:19 PM
5

Funny how MRAs can acknowledge paper abortion being abused but feminists can't acknowledge abortion being abused.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 05:02 PM
6

We don't need to overcome these disagreements. There are valid arguments on both sides (least true with infant genital mutilation.) Disagreement is good and healthy.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 04:59 PM
-1

I believe in equality. For over 50 years women have had the CHOICE not to be mothers and the feminists who insist they're fighting for equality have never even casually proposed giving men the EQUAL choice to not be fathers. "If he doesn't want to be a father he needs to keep it in his pants". Well, I simply apply that same principle to women because I believe in "equality between the sexes". If the choice to not be a parent isn't an unassailable right for men, then it should not be an unassaila…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 04:50 PM
2

No, but the capacity to is 🤣.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:34 PM
0

Everyone deserves a choice to do whatever they want to their body Then when are men going to get that choice? If a man doesn't want spend >90000hours using his body AND MIND to provide for an unwanted pregnancy, how is that any worse than a woman not wanting to spend <70000 hours providing for an unwanted pregnancy... at least the man isn't killing it.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:32 PM
0

That's exactly what will happen. And due to the 14th amendment, the states which prohibit convenience abortions will NOT be allowed to prohibit abortion tourism to the states which allow it.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:17 PM
10

no, murder is the illegal deliberate killing of another human... the fact that abortion is legal means it is not murder. I am spelling out exactly how your argument that "sometimes fetucide is necessary so it must ALWAYS be ok" is invalid. "sometimes homicide is necessary, so IN THOSE CASES we grant an exception" or are you one of those idiots who thinks termination is laudable?
/r/MensRights04/05/22 05:37 AM
11

very common... and how common your sense is is why we have a feckless president who has proven scandals rather than an asshole president who is ceaselessly accused by the corrupt institutions who put the puppet in place. if you had logical sense you would see that 5% conviction, and 5% (mostly uncharged) proven false means 90% are UNDETERMINED, not "rapists who got away with it"
/r/MensRights04/05/22 05:32 AM
4

yes, swype often fails. thanks, fixed. now. care to stop pretending that a failure to convict = a perpetrator got away with it?
/r/MensRights04/05/22 05:02 AM
12

If he does, he can do it himself. The inverse regret isn't repairable.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 04:30 AM
5

Sounds like a porn of professional wrestling character
/r/MensRights04/05/22 04:28 AM
45

And 5%of rape accusations are true. What's your point? Your (and the rest of feminism's) assumption that all accusations not PROVEN false are true is as absurd as would be of I were say all accusations not PROVEN true are false.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:36 AM
8

Is not getting banned, it's being given back to the states.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:37 AM
11

Then hold both men and women accountable. Men are used to it.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:37 AM
16

So allow for medical necessity. Killing someone with a gun is sometimes necessary for self defense, doesn't mean I'm free to shoot someone because they're financially inconvenient to me.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:36 AM
18

We have the right to remain silent.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:33 AM
5

Maybe if you did they'd stop? /s
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:28 AM
89

Over 99%of false accusers roam free
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:26 AM
0

His career assassinated his character for me. The best I can speak of his fan base is I suspect most of them are immune to the influence of the social lynch mob.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 03:59 PM
84

Let's go equality
/r/MensRights03/05/22 04:51 AM
12

Tease? Immodest?
/r/MensRights03/05/22 04:49 AM
7

He is nothing to me. I stand in support of the presumption of innocence but I have no interest in learning about MMs life. I'll leave proving up to his defense team and people who actually know something about him.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 04:36 AM
3

And human fetuses
/r/MensRights03/05/22 04:33 AM
18

No kidding. An action condemned by over 97% of the male population is "yes all men" but when 7%of BLM protests devolve into riots that 7% "don't represent" the majority even when the majority "respect the diversity of tactics" Meaning they condone the violence.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 04:10 PM
2

The prim reaper.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 03:16 PM
2

Does prim count as a honey badger or a regular guest like TealDeer.. because she's absolutely my favorite!
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:18 PM
8

Do us a favor and take your ignorant bigotry to the feminists. You only hurt those you affiliate with so leave the fight for men's rights to we who are more sensible.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:17 PM
6

That's why he put it in quotes
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:15 PM
5

"Burn them all and let god sort it out." You'd have made a popular judge in Salem Massachusetts in the 17th century
/r/MensRights02/05/22 11:26 AM
1

Oh, well what ever the spirit of the law was. I guess that makes it cool to imprison him for her tax evasion.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 11:21 AM
132

🤮
/r/MensRights02/05/22 05:26 AM
2

Classic feminist projection
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 04:55 AM
2

Lifeboat feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 04:41 AM
8

Feminists don't see evidence. So you can't debunk their doctrines.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 04:40 AM
1

The 2 gay guys
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 04:39 AM
1

Look up Mark and Elizabeth Wilks. HE went to jail because SHE refused to pay her taxes.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 04:21 AM
7

Heartless Bastard here. Anyone tries taking me emotionally hostage I'm walking away. They're free to end their life if they want but that poor decision is just further evidence I must protect myself from their influence.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 04:12 AM
6

Go kiss amber heard's ass. The same percentage of rape accusations that are proven true are proven false so if you wanna rejoice the presumption of innocence, try removing it from false accusers. Not that I approve of this. The burden of proof should ALWAYS be on the prosecution.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 03:21 AM
8

Maybe Chad does. But he's just playing games and seeing how much shit he can get away with before women will choose what they always SAY they want.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 02:58 PM
17

Aren't women constantly saying "I wear this for me"?
/r/MensRights01/05/22 02:56 PM
71

marriage is often a woman's retirement plan.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:48 AM
7

I initially assembled that word wrong and thought it was discussing contortionist porn
/r/MensRights30/04/22 06:18 PM
2

Now let's see the same chart only about the Percentage of population with civil obligations like the draft.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 06:15 PM
1

Never heard anyone claim 1984 sounded feminist before.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 03:09 AM
1

Franchises are NOT PEOPLE. You can not unperson something that IS NOT A PERSON.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 01:55 AM
1

the very first act of feminism was to take the default custody from men with the tender years doctrine by Caroline Norton (now feminists like big red pretend PATRIARCHY gives women custody. as karen straughn says, feminists need to learn to own their shit) were they trying to be equal to men, they'd have gone for shared or split custody. but even with taking their turn at "oppression" wasn't enough... after taking default custody from men to give it women, women found the custodial responsibilit…
/r/MensRights29/04/22 12:48 AM
3

The very name "feminism"is sexist if you apply the correct feminist standards
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:53 PM
8

Dang. 10% of respondents here are feminist missionaries...
/r/MensRights28/04/22 08:44 PM
4

They've never tried to get the same a men. They go for RIGHTS for women completely ignoring the responsibilities that previously earned men those rights.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 02:53 PM
2

So you're openly declaring that you, not feminists, get to define feminism? Do why don't I get to define it as a female supremacy group?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 02:29 PM
5

But "feminism by definition is the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities". So shouldn't they be fighting for Depp to get the support he didn't get because he is a man? Or was Emma Watson, as we suspected, full of it when she said that?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 02:23 PM
2

Boramir... you can't weild the ring of power. If you can convict her great. If that interferes with her employability so be it. But you don't build a civilization by cutting people's legs off and telling them to stand. If you can't convict someone in a court of law you gotta let them live their life... and once their incarceration is over you gotta let them live their lives.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:42 AM
3

Yeah, and I'll not be seeing the movies that cut Depp
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:29 AM
1

Read again.or get out , illiterate
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:26 AM
1

If they're not in jail then yeah. If you can't keep them locked up then you gotta let them live. Otherwise you're forcing them into a life crime.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:25 AM
-4

Decent argument, however I don't consider franchises to be "people" so I'm not unpersoning the franchise. Franchises don't need to live. People do. No amount of evidence can send a franchise to prison because franchises aren't people.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:20 AM
3

Thank you. Corrected.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:47 AM
-3

You're free to disagree... and despite finding your support of cancel culture disgusting, were I your employer I would not fire you for it.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:40 AM
-20

Yes, and I refuse to see any movies that replaced him for it. You're just reinforcing what I said.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:26 AM
-31

Unpersoning isn't justice, it's petty vengeance. I'll support convicting her and sending her to jail... but it's not your employer's job to publish you for social sins. If your violations were not on the job then employer's need to stay out of it.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:15 AM
1

It ceases to be bisexuality when it includes bestiality
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:09 AM
-64

Darkness cannot drive out darkness. You can't fight cancel culture WITH cancel culture. If her going to jail makes her unavailable to do her job for her so be it, fire her. but aside from that, her relationship to Johnny should not impact her employment with other entities. In fact, her employment makes her better able to pay damages to Johnny. I'm boycotting both franchises who dropped Depp.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:07 AM
1

Those last 2 lines are now a quote.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 02:13 AM
2

depp should... but the fact that he even MIGHT not is a testimony to how broken and gynocentric our legal system is. that said, psychology has just as much feminist infiltration as the judiciary... that shrink testifying about Heard really impressed me so maybe society is starting to pull out of its death spiral.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:05 AM
24

because that would mean all the less obvious ones they dismissed outright might have been legit.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:59 PM
26

DARVO
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:56 PM
3

I deliberately avoided this by taking sole custody... few men have that option... being a boyscout (figuratively) has its advantages.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 06:07 AM
4

Romantic interest? Yes. Actual relationship? No.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 05:02 AM
0

Gotcha. So you're taking the "no true Scotsman" to the next level. By your standard I could advocate for every men's rights issue and still not be a men's rights advocate AT ALL if I do not rank them in the same order you do. Yeah, please convert to feminism as people like you hurt the credibility of all you associate with.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 03:43 PM
0

No true Scotsmaning like a feminist. Sad. I would rather suffer non consentual body modification than the unpersoning that can occur from a conviction under false accusation.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 03:24 PM
1

I agree it's an issue... but not number 1
/r/MensRights26/04/22 02:51 AM
3

I agree there are more.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 02:15 AM
3

I didn't (wasn't physical) but after she ran away with cyber boyfriend number 3, someone who saw first hand all I sacrifice for her (including a federal job) had the nerve (and illogic) to say to me "if it takes 2 to make it work then it takes 2 to make it fail". Fairly certain her tune would still not have changed had I revealed the lies of marital rape she used to manipulate her boyfriends or the fact that the first 2 were minors. When women misbehave somehow it is a man's fault.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 01:46 AM
1

No, Chad is very much "non-domesticated"
/r/MensRights26/04/22 01:36 AM
2

Not really. Women have always create Incels by being unattracted to the bottom portion of men. with or without feminists, women marry up which will inevitably leave some men unmatched. But by convincing women to not even acknowledge the suffering this puts Incels through, feminists have radicalized them.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 01:33 AM
1

They don't just die in the field like good little pariahs. Being hurt by complete social rejection is for humans, not unattractive men. To be clear this is not my personal outlook. Freaking Poe's law.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 01:25 AM
7

Imagine if society treated land whales with the same disdain they treat Incels... they would double the female perpetrated homicide rates. Meanwhile there have been, what? 2? 3? Lethal documented incel attacks?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 01:17 AM
56

No. And the patriarchy of feminist imaginings has never existed.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 10:52 PM
1

I might open an account.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 04:19 PM
8

The first act of feminism was Caroline Norton creating the tender years doctrine which took default custody from men and gave it to women... a movement FOR EQUALITY would have gone for default split custody. The second act of feminism was to invent child support to push the custodial responsibility from the woman who just gained custody back to the man who just lost custody. Nothing equality about that. Feminism was never for equality.
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/22 12:23 PM
26

So a nonconforming woman learns how to drive.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 03:16 AM
1

I'm so nonconforming that I don't even conform to nonconforming.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 03:14 AM
1

Because fair and open debate requires consistent logic and reasoning. These in and of themselves are inconsistent with "feminist ethics" as declared BY feminists. They literally called "partiality" an ethic.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 09:12 PM
2

except when that woman judge is a feminist who thinks a man testifying to what he directly heard is "hear-say"
/r/MensRights24/04/22 05:35 PM
3

if this judge were any more in amber's pocket, Hellen Keller could see it from inside a lead lined sensory deprivation chamber.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 05:34 PM
-2

Gynocentrism is in our genes. When people think themselves being above their genetic programming they are even more vulnerable to it. By thinking they are not gynocentric they see everything that is not gynocentric as misogynistic leaving no room for consideration of men.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 04:48 PM
5

Do they do it for all negligent manslaughter?
/r/MensRights22/04/22 12:41 PM
14

The best way for anyone to piss is how they want
/r/MensRights21/04/22 04:10 PM
3

I have embraced the title misoistaphobe. If I want so attached to my name is change to that for my name.
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/22 04:39 AM
5

I suggest you read closer. A: I have only argued for tying everyone's right to vote to the draft registration THE WAY IT CURRENTLY IS FOR MEN. if that is unconstitutional then the entirety of selective service IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.... there is no part of the constitution prohibiting the draft, however discriminating based on sex IS unconstitutional... thus tying the draft to the right to vote to the draft FOR MEN BUT NOT WOMEN is, in fact, unconstitutional. B: no, it is NEVER dangerous to explore…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 01:39 AM
6

ROFL. you really just appealed to the constitution to justify silencing unpopular speech? I can't begin to argue with such absurdity.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 11:40 PM
10

Thank you for continuing to speak. I was going to counter the dislikes here because people shouldn't recieve hate in response to ignorance as this question implies.... but your continued comments are exactly the reaction that resulted in the west not caring about the boys being burnt alive. Man loses arm "hmm, that's not good" woman gets paper cut "REEE! We need to make paper safer! This tolerance of sharp paper is misogyny, if men were secretaries they'd have invented safer paper long ago!"
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:46 PM
2

/s?
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:39 PM
7

First step. Why men's rights advocacy is needed: Watch Cassie Jaye's "the red pill". Second step: why feminism is a bed of lies: Watch Karen Straughn (girl writes what) YouTube videos about feminism owning their shit. What do I personally think about feminism? It is a religion so cancerous that Christ, Allah, and Buddha could all show them scientifically how wrong feminism is, and most feminists would abandon what ever faith they have and science to hold onto their feminist beliefs. It preys and…
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:38 PM
3

I think it's an interesting concept to explore.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:26 PM
46

I got a temporary full reddit ban for "hate speech" for saying to take the vote from anyone not registered for the draft.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 04:14 PM
2

that said, we will disregard everything for which your only support is ethos as many of us strongly consider the bulk of academia feminist indoctrinated at least. you need data and reason for us to actually regard anything you say. and IF you have those things we will still argue with you as we argue with each other when ever we can because we think challenging our thoughts is a good thing
/r/MensRights20/04/22 04:06 PM
6

"Our struggle is my struggle" doubly funny since half the title is the English translation of "mein kampf". They said 'feminist ideology is hitlers book' right in the title of their paper
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/22 02:51 PM
6

Feminists don't joke for laughter, their objective is clapter. Thing is, I don't even think their low tribal standards would get like on that comment.
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/22 02:45 PM
5

Anti feminism is people intellectually overcoming their natural instinct AND social conditioning towards their because evidence has made it infernal that feminism is full of shit. Feminists think feminism forever... MRAs don't want to be MRAs. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/txpjzi/i_genuinely_hope_the_mens_rights_will_never/i3nocc9?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/22 04:40 AM
2

I don't need women who have subscribed to your misanthropic religion to take me seriously. In fact, of I were single if WANT you to self select out from my prospects. Anyone who believes hitlers jew conspiracy theory with men replacing jews is a threat to any man in her life.
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/22 04:28 AM
2

I'm just glad my ex didn't know how much of a chance she stood... sure my getting sole custody was obvious to any intelligent person, but had she fought I'm not confident a Washington state judge would've agreed with me...I mean we have judges assigning child support to convicted rapists from their victims.
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/22 04:11 AM
1

Yes, he can sign over his rights, but he can only sign over his responsibilities if the woman both let's him AND has sufficient means without state assistance.
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/22 04:02 AM
65

Take hitlers jew conspiracy theory, replace jews with men, and you have patriarchy theory
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/22 03:58 AM
2

They're not true Scotsmen... I mean feminists.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 03:56 AM
1

Then don't expect us to pretend that you are reliable. If we have to compensate for when you won't be able to pull your weight, then we must be able to discuss the fact that we can't depend on you.
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/22 03:06 AM
1

Understanding is irrelevant. Feminists have demanded we consider women's cycle as insignificant AND it is demanded that we accommodate their cycles. Damned if we do, damned if we don't. You can't say periods don't make you undependible AND demand we accommodate the unreliability having a bad cycle causes.
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/22 02:58 AM
53

Don't worry. It'll either become just another lesbian club or close within a month. Women love the attention they object to.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 06:11 PM
2

The red pill just means accepting the FACT that society is lying to you (and themselves) about human nature. The black pill will make you comparable to political lesbians... They're not happy, nor will you be.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 12:27 PM
2

you can not demand everyone depend on you as if you are always reliable AND demand they accommodate you being unreliable during your period. maybe YOUR menstruation makes you bail on work once a month that is fine, but that proves this meme is absolute BULLSHIT.
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/22 01:34 AM
10

"Half of our tribe says that unfunny boastful rapist 'is not nice', see how balanced we are". Find me a boastful rapist the even 1/4 MRM doesn't completely condemn. Oh and "I'm gonna say the rest of your examples don't count and you just have to accept my ruling on that".
/r/MensRights18/04/22 11:51 AM
15

Before you read any further, commit to NOT "no true Scotsman" them. How about the women on "the talk" I'm sure they and at least 90% of their audience fancy themselves feminists. Do you suppose they imagine that Katherine klieu's husband consented to the "fabulous" act of cutting off his penis and throwing it down the garbage disposal? Harpies will never admit they don't give a shit about men's consent but their actions when men's consent is nullified prove only women's consent is sacred to them…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 05:15 AM
7

Our vice president is a hyena.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 04:16 AM
7

Because the weak gotta flex. Let's see them work 70 hour week cleaning potato silos moving 12' 80# plenums with an untreated broken finger. Or make a days drive back to base without rescue after throwing your back out (out on injury for the next 6 months, never fully recovering) while chaining truck tires in the snow (oh, and having to remove those same 80 lbs chains without help.) Or not me personally, restore power during a snow storm or break up fatbergs in the sewer.
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/22 02:25 AM
67

My wife and I have standing permission. If we don't say no, it's a go. I wouldn't be in a relationship where We didn't give ourselves to eachother. Can we have boundaries? Yes, but the boundaries are what we need to express, not the permissions. The fact that feminists would change their response based on the sex direction is both obvious and pointless. I don't want to live in a world where my relationships are defined by feminists.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:53 AM
40

Incels generally accept the label, just not the venom feminists affix. I have 3 children and we're not done yet... but I still never deny their accusations that I am an incel... I just ask them why they're "promoting toxic masculinity by trying to shame me for a perceived lack of sexual conquest "
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:17 AM
9

No no no, giving a hoot about men's issues is like caring about liberty... They're "unacceptable ideas"
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:44 PM
4

"If we ruin you, then stop depending on us."
/r/MensRights17/04/22 04:33 PM
9

That never works. A girl once tried coming out on top by emphasizing she rejected me to which I responded "yes, you rejected me, you won in the relationship ending, now keep your victory by not calling me any more" eventually after changing my number I had to call the cops to get her to stop.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 04:31 PM
20

her: I want a man who is over 6 foot, have a 6 pack, and make 6 figures. him: cool, I prefer women who are petite. her: MISOGYNY! you objectify women!
/r/MensRights17/04/22 03:20 AM
1

HOW DARE YOU PROVE ME WRONG!
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:25 PM
2

You failed to say "women are wonderful so I'm separating my self for their betterment" and that's why you were marked as hate speech. Either that or deep down someone realized segregating women from men's productivity is a death sentence so they thought you were calling for women's deaths by putting them on their own planet. They can hate and despise men but still need men to restore their power during a snow storm.
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/22 02:58 PM
13

Incel culture... so not only are they now pariahs unworthy to socialize with us, but they aren't allowed to socialize with eachother either. Wow.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 02:50 PM
6

Are you illiterate? I said nothing about us blocking you. You'll get blocked from FEMINIST reddits for having activity here...
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:29 PM
4

Funny. I've heard the same doctor refusal for men. It's almost a if looking at one side of a situation gives a one side view. And if your married to someone, your reproductive health IS their business. If you want privacy from your significant other then don't get married. Go back to feminist reddits before they block you for being in this sub. Your missionary services are not needed here.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:50 PM
2

Yeah, when it comes to men in divorce I totally won. I even got sole custody. Alimony and child support should be seen as an insult to those "strong and independent women"
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:14 PM
7

Only for the man. My divorce cost me $350... and my ex wife $0
/r/MensRights14/04/22 01:00 PM
19

It makes a marriage contract less important than a cellphone contract
/r/MensRights14/04/22 11:21 AM
3

Toxic masculinity is best demonstrated by Zoe Tur threatening Ben Shapiro and by macho ma'am Tranny savage. If they can't admit that those are toxic masculinity then there is no toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 05:17 AM
2

There's an oxymoron.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 04:39 AM
4

Later this week he apologized for saying the women's team would lose against the men's team...
/r/MensRights14/04/22 04:38 AM
3

when they call me an incel I ask them "why are you attempting to shame me for my supposed lack of sexual conquest, isn't that part of 'toxic masculinity'?" unfortunately they are immune to being persuaded by logic, even if it is their own.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 08:09 PM
5

Academia put on a science skin suit and said there's no difference. It's the same level of "science" as informed Dr Kellogg that it would stop masturbation.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 04:18 PM
4

When people say that I point out that means it's OK to roofie girl because of she doesn't remember the rape is ok.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 04:14 PM
21

Anything feminists declare to be a red flag I'll fly with pride.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 03:31 PM
1

And you expected different? This looks pretty generic to me.
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 02:03 AM
6

I fear my dedication to justice and evidence would get me removed from any jury. But if evidence fails to say you're guilty you'd want me on your jury. Hell, just being on a men's rights forum probably would get us all removed from jury duty
/r/MensRights12/04/22 12:16 AM
69

Because for men the military is about sacrifice. For women it's about opportunity.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 03:35 AM
1

But they have too much power. They feel it ok to rob the majority of women who appreciate because they have resting bitch personality. And society is bowing to them.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 02:43 AM
1

Will Smith acted in accordance with Jada's will. She is the motivation being his violence perpetrated against Chris Rock. He's still responsible for his choice to execute her will. When someone tried taking me emotionally hostage I walked away from them.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 08:46 PM
10

Too young to consent to sex is absolutely too young to consent to sex change. The consequences of sex that we "must" protect children from regardless of their own personal desires are far less significant than the consequences of sex change, and even less significant than just puberty blockers.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:44 PM
290

I'd much rather live in a world where both sexes are free to flirt and give compliments to random people than one where neither is.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:39 PM
1

Lots of things are easier said than done. Doesn't negate personal responsibility.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:36 PM
0

if it's part of an abusive relationship then choosing to stay is self infliction. if you can't leave because of money then you are selling your endurance for the money. if you don't leave for the children then yes, it's a horrible situation but then you're dealing with a hell of a lot more than a sexual assault. for pregnancy they have the choice of fetucide and adoption. most STIs have cures. and adding in the factor of a STI without cure is like adding in life without parole. psychological tra…
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:42 AM
5

Considering an assault comes to an end and a false accusation can ruin the rest of your life... I'd much rather be assaulted than accused.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 01:00 AM
2

Yes, groups self identified as people "hunters" are totally going to grasp nuance. Hell, I have literally been called a pedophile on 2 separate occasions because my wife was 19 when we met and married. Someone like you would take hear that judgement trust it. So no, I don't trust people who form mobs around that topic too have a lick of sense, or even be less a threat to society than the alleged predators they target.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 08:10 PM
5

Yes, 100%of the sex offender registry is men who have put their penis in a baby. As a trucker I find your lack of nuance comprehension of the world embaressing.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 06:33 PM
6

Don't toss out highway lemonade bottles under any circumstances... doesn't mean you should be lynched if you do. Further more, if rather someone piss in a bush than in their pants.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 06:30 PM
1

The savages will say "oh well, it's was still better than doing nothing." Is amazing how people can justify anything... and people struggle to understand how the holocaust could happen.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 06:26 PM
11

Right. Isn't it great to have a target for all your savage instincts. So great to be able to think yourself civilized while deep down not truly believing in civilization. You are no different than the men who lynched Emmitt Till.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 06:21 PM
15

Mob justice is worse than vigilanteism. A vigilante may act if they have first hand knowledge... mobs are just collectives following eachother. I don't condone vigilanteism, but like war and assassination, there are times such evil MAY result in net good... mobs never constrain themselves to appropriate targets.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 06:15 PM
1

The top 10%of men don't represent the bottom 90%of men. That's the apex fallacy. "Omg, 95%of military leaders are men!" Yeah, and 98% of military grunt deaths are men.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:20 PM
2

If you want to hold men to this standard, fine... but hold women to it as well. Whether it be reproductive responsibility or reproductive choice, drop the double standards.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 11:35 AM
2

If women don't want to have kids they need to figure it out as soon as possible then get final ligation. If they want kids, still get final ligation but freeze your eggs. The eggs are viable for decades. Damn that sounds vile. Is just a vile when the gender reverse you said. No thanks. I'll stick with monogamy. I'm not arguing for myself. I'm arguing for equality. I'm perfectly fine outlawing fetucide and enforcing child support. But if women have the post sex choice not to become mothers, men m…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 04:01 AM
3

Men die doing the work necessary to keep society in a condition that women can think they don't need men. Men die on the job because women are too privileged to go out in a winter storm to restore power. Men die on the job more because feminists don't give a shit about breaking into the glass cellar. Men die on the job more because men do what NEEDS to be done and women do what gives them a sense of fulfillment. And all this is a distraction from the fact that when you steal 25%of a man's income…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 03:03 AM
1

Deflecting from your hypocrisy being illuminated by calling it Whataboutism is Whataboutism.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:34 PM
18

Many times More men die every year in the 1 kind of labor men do than do women in BOTH kinds of labor. So stop post hocing excuses for your position and try applying consistent standards.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 03:55 PM
24

If a man doesn't want the responsibility of fatherhood he needs to keep it in his pants. Oh, you're talking about wahmens bodily autonomy? Well that's different. If a woman doesn't want the responsibility of maternity she needs to keep her legs closed I have never earned a penny without using my body thus taking my money is taking my body for a time. 25%of a 40hr workweek (as if my average isn't 60) for 18 years is about 50% more time than a pregnancy... and I don't get to sleep or much of anyth…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 12:58 PM
2

Revisionist history. The only documented coat hanger abortion (that feminists love to harp about) happened in a place where abortion was legal.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 12:03 PM
-12

Looking at one side of an issue only is feminist dogma.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 12:00 PM
2

Funny story, I've had a girl literally do that (it was funny and she wasn't trying to gain social leverage or anything malignant. So it's not among my complaints)
/r/MensRights06/04/22 09:59 PM
8

Several times over. The Equality they pretend to seek was exceeded with their first act, the implementation of the tender years doctrine... and they've only taken us further from equality since.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 09:57 PM
5

Right. And BLM just cares about saving black lives and nazis are just national socialists.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 09:51 PM
21

I hope men's rights ceases to be a movement... because our mission was accomplished and feminism has been defeated and proven the misanthropic death cult it is.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 06:15 PM
0

If the woke had their way, white men saying 2+2=4 means 2+2=everything BUT 4
/r/MensRights06/04/22 06:11 PM
9

No child support order against you, no opinion. Does that work?
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:40 AM
5

My ex ran away 2000 miles with an Xbox live boyfriend. The only option Washington state gave me was "no fault". But while this denigrates marriage itself, it did allow the divorce to only take 4 months and $350 so it didn't personally hurt me.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:35 AM
5

"Women don't make up stories like that" thankfully she only dragged my name through the mud to manipulate her cyber boyfriends... but I'm sure had she successfully seduced me that night 1 week before running away with #3 (first time in 6 years of marriage she tried to initiate) she would have gone to the law with her rape lies... hard to say your husband rapes you regularly when you've not had sex in 3 months. "If it takes 2 to make a marriage work then it takes 2 to make it fail" like seriously…
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:27 AM
6

Tell her "no, I've decided only to cut my daughter's genitals."
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:19 AM
2

So nice to see an atheist. I get tired of the antitheists.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:16 AM
7

If someone likes genital cutting, they can cut their own. Infant genital mutilation is a human rights violation.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:14 AM
2

The no fault divorce makes a mockery of marriage.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 03:30 AM
-1

They are attributes overwhelmingly carried by one sex that are harmful to the actor and those around them. For example, very few women would use violence to defend their husbands from a words... and even fewer men would expect it, both are toxic. I make a point to use TF where appropriate to balance out the over use of TM but integrity requires I accept TM where appropriate. My favorite way to counter the TM narrative is to point out macho ma'am tranny savage and Zoe Tur threatening Ben Shapiro …
/r/MensRights05/04/22 04:50 AM
-3

And why my comment got downvoted. I understand their knee jerk reaction but it is still disappointing. I like to think MRAs predominantly thoughtful rather than emotional.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 04:28 AM
2

ROFLMBO. Men have always killed over failure to succeed in the most powerful biological imperative... but you never had a problem with it because the people they killed (like the VAST majority still today) were only themselves. What has changed that a FEW are now taking others (others who are NOT beneath your notice or care) with them: Being raised without a father? Not being taught stoicism? Being vilified just for being a male? Not having any belief in punishment in an afterlife? Being told th…
/r/MensRights05/04/22 03:15 AM
-12

She's not wrong... but she failed to mention that Will's toxic masculinity was borne of Jada's toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 09:05 PM
15

Because women can't be satisfied with the bottom percentile. If the bottom 10% improve themselves then they must supplant the next 10%. Incels must exist in romance for the same reason losers must exist in racing, it's not an imperial standard they must achieve, it's a relative one.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 04:34 AM
37

I'm safe from that, I don't have any muscles
/r/MensRights02/04/22 04:41 PM
1

No. But that's more about the gym than the male only.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 04:40 PM
2

I want truth and equality. Examples: In unilateral domestic violence, arrest the perpetrator, regardless of sex. In reciprocal domestic violence... try to find out who initiated it and arrest THEM. If the initiator can not be determined then the man and woman must be treated the same. Restore the burden of proof to prosecution. Overcoming a presumption of guilt (both in court and public opinion) is a burden no one should bear. Believe EVIDENCE. Charge false accusers. Yes they get the same presum…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 04:26 PM
18

Tribalism. Anything done by the evil tribe must be interpreted as negatively as possible, the same things done by my tribe will be interpreted more generously than reasonably possible because "it's different when my side does it"
/r/MensRights01/04/22 11:00 AM
3

"Women have always been the primary sufferers of blah blah blah"
/r/MensRights01/04/22 02:47 AM
3

I'm gonna need you to get ALL the way off my back about that.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 05:56 AM
2

All arguments with leftists are in bad faith... because an argument requires some consistent standards and logic.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 03:54 AM
1

Sorry, but I'm going to have to see a sympathetic report. I like Ben Shapiro and the daily quote, but I really prefer to get witnesses who report in opposition to their bias, not confirmation there of.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 03:51 AM
8

Real men don't give a s*** whether anyone else thinks they are a real man.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 03:16 AM
2

Some people bruise easily. You are discussing separate parts details that don't compare. Her slapping him indicates she deliberately open handed hit him, giving her a black eye could be anything from a thoughtless backhand to a full body right hook. I once got a black eye from a tennis ball that I threw. You assault someone they don't owe you a fair fight. Any slap that isn't playful done in response to words is initiating violence. In all violent altercations I condemn the initiator. I don't ca…
/r/MensRights30/03/22 03:13 AM
2

Still going.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:05 PM
0

Guess that's will smith's white privilege.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:04 PM
4

Toxic femininity begets toxic masculinity. He thought the joke was funny until his master told him it wasn't.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:03 PM
1

At least any Schumer is in Smith's same weight class.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:14 AM
1

"Keep my wife's name out of your damn mouth" Man, keep other men's cocks out of your wife's damn mouth.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:09 AM
-3

Freedom is the freedom to say 2 and 2 makes 4. There is a serious danger of people who subscribe to the trans ideology denying us the liberty to say male and homosapiens makes man.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 01:58 AM
2

No. Let's worry about 100% of the population. The initiator of violence is guilty of assault and battery no matter what subset of human they are or imagine they are.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 01:54 AM
1

male homosapiens.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 01:52 AM
47

Indulging her toxic femininity was Will Smith displaying toxic masculinity... and feminists loved it.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 05:45 PM
2

Not me. I'll only get violent in response to violence. If any insult could justify an act of violence my ex manipulating her cyber boyfriends with stories of marital rape would have done it.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 05:40 PM
-3

I can't say you're COMPLETELY wrong. I guess tradcons are roughly as likely to support this act of violence as the wahmen_worsters.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 05:37 PM
14

Love all the leftists declaring that violence is the appropriate response to mean words... they're finally not pretending to live up to the standards they demand of those they disagree with.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 12:57 PM
20

Women must make a much as men... where have all the men who make more money than me gone?
/r/MensRights27/03/22 05:49 PM
2

Contempt my ass. It requires all out perjury charges.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 04:34 PM
1

Not gonna let the petty snipes of someone who takes offense at "that tastes like something for a girl" offend me. My taste in music is more girly than 90+%of girls taste in music... I enjoyed Netflix's "leap". If someone points out how girly my taste in art is I'll say "yeah, and?". I've not seen to many dudes use the term "boomer" to imply insult, as that to her girly taste in drinks and her being so quick to take offense and it looks like she's not as much like a man as she thinks. Regardless …
/r/MensRights26/03/22 04:30 PM
1

Your confusing being wrong with being evil. Hitler was right on a lot, were he not the nazi war machine would've been much easier to defeat. Lack of morality and lack of information are very different. Almost no one is able to realize they lack morality, which is why everyone thinks "it's different when my side does it"
/r/MensRights26/03/22 04:55 AM
1

You're imagining a different scenario. I have spoken with a feminist missionary here who had no history despite karma in the thousands who admitted he removed all his posts. If you were wrong, you should take pride in your growth. Not shame over your mistakes.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 04:27 AM
0

You got 3 options. An immoral nation, a 2 tier citizenship (starship troopers), or your moral nation being conquered by an immoral nation.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 10:40 PM
18

If they're so ashamed with their own opinions they memory hole their own words, they aren't worth talking to. Edit... damn swype making me look like someone who doesn't know his homophones
/r/MensRights25/03/22 03:49 PM
13

Who would anyone hate on research with voluntary guinea pigs?
/r/MensRights25/03/22 03:48 PM
10

If that's what he's into... shouldn't feminists WANT that robot to exist? The fact that "raping" a sexbot is an offense to feminists makes it appear that harping on rape is less about protecting women from an unacceptable violation and more just a post hoc tool to demonize men.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 05:13 AM
2

Are you aware that a man was fined 10k in 2011 for not giving his ex wife enough sex during their marriage. It wasn't just women who were expected to have sex with their spouse. "Cleave into him/her and no others" is in many vows. Not only was sex an assumed part of marriage, but how the hell do you expect to overcome the burden of proof for "I didn't consent to have sex with the person I felt vowed to be the only person I have sex with"? If by some miracle you have the crazy evidence necessary …
/r/MensRights25/03/22 04:52 AM
4

Any time they bring up toxic masculinity I say "I'll accept that toxic masculinity is a thing if you'll admit that https://youtu.be/LVC-5shAkuE is an example of it". Unless they're a TERF they can't admit that. Zoe Tur threatening Ben Shapiro is another example of toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 04:17 AM
3

What you call misogyny, I call giving women less preferential treatment than they are accustomed to. In a society where women CAN destroy a man with mere words, and even proving those words to be false Isn't guaranteed to clear your name... how can you trust a group who will not be held accountable? In a world where Johnny Depp lost staring roles in 2 major franchises because his abuser accused him (and all evidence said the abuse was unilateral from her) but his violent abuser didn't lose anyth…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 04:07 AM
1

The threshold for what is "hatred" of women compared to the threshold of what is "hatred" of men is absurd. If I say "women work less than men" or "women treat marriage as their retirement plan" it's "MYSOGGYKNEES!", meanwhile #ki11a11men spread for years before getting stopped. I shouldn't have to say "not all" on things which are majority, especially when feminists get away with saying "yes all" on things measuring single digits per capita.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 03:08 AM
2

The threshold for what is "hatred" of women compared to the threshold of what is "hatred" of men is absurd. If I say "women work less than men" or "women treat marriage as their retirement plan" it's "MYSOGGYKNEES!", meanwhile #ki11a11men spread for years before getting stopped. I shouldn't have to say "not all" on things which are majority, especially when feminists get away with saying "yes all" on things measuring single digits per capita.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 03:08 AM
3

It doesn't count a a minority of feminists when it's the academic and political leaders.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 02:09 AM
5

Until feminism loses its grip yes. I dream of being able to abandon the label because mission accomplished but I don't see that happening in reality.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 02:07 AM
0

Most women need to stop sitting back silent and letting feminism speak for them. I'll stand with them in this, but I'll not stand for them... they gotta be standing too.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 11:35 AM
2

Until feminism en mass is willing to admit men have superior physically I say abolish sex based segregation in sports. More on point here, until mainstream feminism is willing to say "trans women are men" I say let trans women set all the women's athletic records.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:16 AM
18

Presumption of guilt is a burden no one should ever face whether it be from the law, the mob, or a lover.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 12:26 AM
55

Looks like a dodged bullet. Imagine marrying someone who would believe that of you so easily.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:38 PM
2

Because they are taught to be by feminism. Feminism is so pervasive in our society that even people who don't process belief in it are still heavily influenced by it and unknowingly swallow its doctrines. Women who think themselves "traditional" feel accomplished throwing a frozen pizza in the oven because feminism has convinced society that a SAHM who effectively keeps the house in order and cooks consistently is an unrealistic expectation.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:17 PM
2

Yes, that's exactly what I was referring to.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 05:17 PM
1

Not all gynocentrism is misandry. If you underfill the boats leaving more men behind than necessary, that would be misandry.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 02:29 PM
4

We don't either way.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 04:22 AM
2

Because societies that didn't were less likely to survive disasters. But this loss in survivability isn't as extreme as the last survivability that feminism introduces.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 04:38 AM
1

I strongly suspect that my (now ex) wife's false positive was her killing my baby.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 04:33 AM
2

The funny thing about UBI is that it is more capitalist than the minimum wage our capitalist zealots are willing to tolerate. By giving the workforce the power to scrape by without accepting insulting wages, employers must compete for employees thus restoring negotiation to wage setting. As Jordan Peterson said "if you can't tell someone to 'go to hell' then you can't negotiate with them"
/r/MensRights20/03/22 06:01 PM
2

I was like "like communism? what?" But in the way you describe, yeah.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 05:56 PM
1

The concept of libertarianism? Important to keep in mind. The libertarian party of the USA? anarchists who have taken libertarianism to an absurd degree. These are my opinions, I don't think there's an MRA position on either.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 05:55 PM
0

This kind of false dichotomy is what creates feminist insanity. Traditional gender roles have worked for millennia and as such should be encouraged... but liberty is far greater. There is a lot of overlap between the sexes but there are differences which are best utilized rather than denied.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 12:48 PM
13

I certainly share them but don't annoy her with them.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 10:50 AM
12

if they were jokes I would be fine with them. but so few are intended to elicit laughter, mostly just clapter.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 10:07 PM
3

To the MRM my most controversial opinion is that male disposability is a fact that must be accepted. To the world my most controversial opinion is that men must be respected and compensated for bearing that disposability. To both my most controversial opinion is that while I want to alleviate what motivates people to suicide, I fully support everyone's freedom to commit suicide.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 03:12 AM
1

Do you get fulfillment from your job, Or is it drudgery necessary to advance your shared lives? If the former, you reinforce, not refute, my position. If the latter, then good, you're an exception to the rule.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 03:25 PM
5

If a girl wants your best years she needs to give you hers. Her best years are when she has her youthful beauty. Yours are when you've accumulated wealth. She had her chance to invest in you when she was younger, now either live for yourself or find a PYT who will give you what this woman didn't.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 05:23 AM
2

As with most things feminists gripe about, the term has some validity, but not even 1/10th as much as they apply it. Here is an example of toxic masculinity. https://youtu.be/LVC-5shAkuE
/r/MensRights07/03/22 12:53 PM
3

This being the case is gynocentric, my admitting it is not.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 11:30 PM
3

So you're saying he treats women the way feminists treat men.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 11:19 PM
4

First of all, Incels are the most marginalize group in today's society... the least we can do is NOT join the mob in kicking them. And if we accomplish that first task (the arduous task of treating them like.... HUMAN BEINGS) then they'll naturally gravitate here as we're the only people who treat them with the minimum dignity everyone should be treated, and cancel culture keeps figuratively bombing everywhere they build for themselves to congregate. Incels aren't made by being told about Chad a…
/r/MensRights06/03/22 11:11 PM
4

The species is biologically gynocentric. And men are biologically programmed to spread their genes fat and wide. Civilization is about overcoming biological instincts
/r/MensRights06/03/22 09:01 PM
2

Sure, for when the oh so tolerant left show how words are more violent that literally violating constitutional rights.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 07:20 PM
3

Because uncircumcised men aren't "a protected class". Nothing says "I believe in equality for all" like designating castes which get special treatment.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 07:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter