TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

megazen Archive

View 194 posts and 652 comments by megazen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
400

megazen/r/MensRights17/07/11 02:25 PM
270

megazen/r/MensRights09/08/11 03:21 AM
232

megazen/r/MensRights13/08/13 11:05 AM
182

megazen/r/MensRights27/09/11 09:18 AM
129

megazen/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:25 AM
112

Discriminationmegazen/r/MensRights03/08/18 10:27 PM
106

megazen/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:20 PM
101

megazen/r/MensRights18/05/11 01:07 PM
93

megazen/r/MensRights28/08/11 09:22 AM
92

megazen/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:11 AM
89

megazen/r/MensRights07/09/13 07:08 AM
86

megazen/r/MensRights04/08/11 11:03 AM
73

megazen/r/MensRights22/06/11 01:50 PM
70

megazen/r/MensRights13/09/11 06:06 PM
60

megazen/r/MensRights23/06/13 07:34 PM
58

megazen/r/MensRights06/08/12 02:40 PM
57

megazen/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:24 AM
54

megazen/r/MensRights24/06/11 04:10 PM
52

megazen/r/MensRights07/12/11 09:49 AM
51

Legal Rightsmegazen/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:57 PM
48

megazen/r/MensRights22/07/12 03:54 PM
46

megazen/r/MensRights10/08/11 05:47 AM
46

megazen/r/MensRights27/10/11 12:59 PM
46

megazen/r/MensRights06/09/11 02:58 PM
42

megazen/r/MensRights04/08/11 11:19 PM
40

megazen/r/MensRights21/08/12 07:41 AM
40

megazen/r/MensRights23/06/11 02:41 AM
39

megazen/r/MensRights16/07/11 07:47 PM
39

megazen/r/MensRights21/06/11 05:53 PM
38

megazen/r/MensRights28/08/11 08:38 AM
36

megazen/r/MensRights05/08/12 11:16 PM
34

megazen/r/MensRights26/07/11 12:57 AM
31

megazen/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:44 AM
30

megazen/r/MensRights01/10/11 11:12 PM
30

megazen/r/MensRights29/06/11 01:01 AM
29

megazen/r/MensRights26/07/11 06:49 AM
27

megazen/r/MensRights15/07/11 06:20 PM
26

megazen/r/MensRights27/09/11 12:20 AM
26

megazen/r/MensRights02/06/12 01:49 PM
24

megazen/r/MensRights04/06/11 01:06 PM
22

megazen/r/MensRights06/12/11 05:00 AM
22

megazen/r/MensRights19/06/11 07:57 PM
22

megazen/r/MensRights19/06/11 05:02 AM
22

megazen/r/MensRights06/11/11 03:28 AM
21

megazen/r/MensRights12/10/11 01:37 AM
21

megazen/r/MensRights12/06/11 07:18 PM
20

megazen/r/MensRights22/07/11 11:35 AM
20

megazen/r/MensRights23/03/12 02:46 PM
20

megazen/r/MensRights24/06/11 01:49 AM
20

megazen/r/MensRights16/07/11 11:40 PM
19

megazen/r/MensRights09/08/11 01:42 AM
19

megazen/r/MensRights18/06/11 10:36 PM
19

megazen/r/MensRights30/05/11 10:40 PM
18

megazen/r/MensRights27/05/12 11:39 PM
18

megazen/r/MensRights23/04/12 09:46 AM
18

megazen/r/MensRights06/09/11 04:29 PM
17

megazen/r/MensRights24/06/11 04:05 PM
17

megazen/r/MensRights26/10/11 03:42 AM
17

megazen/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:27 PM
17

megazen/r/MensRights09/07/11 05:37 PM
16

megazen/r/MensRights19/07/11 09:05 PM
16

megazen/r/MensRights19/06/11 04:24 AM
15

megazen/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:12 PM
15

megazen/r/MensRights04/06/11 01:57 PM
15

megazen/r/MensRights21/06/11 06:05 PM
14

megazen/r/MensRights09/06/11 03:14 PM
14

megazen/r/MensRights12/10/11 01:40 AM
14

megazen/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:01 AM
13

megazen/r/MensRights28/10/11 11:32 AM
13

megazen/r/MensRights01/05/12 08:16 AM
13

megazen/r/MensRights09/08/11 12:39 AM
13

megazen/r/MensRights04/06/11 01:00 PM
13

megazen/r/MensRights21/06/11 05:57 PM
12

megazen/r/MensRights08/07/11 09:01 PM
12

megazen/r/MensRights28/10/11 02:45 AM
12

megazen/r/MensRights22/07/11 06:02 PM
12

megazen/r/MensRights21/09/11 02:43 PM
12

Social Issuesmegazen/r/MensRights15/03/16 04:27 PM
12

megazen/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:08 PM
12

megazen/r/MensRights21/06/13 09:01 AM
12

megazen/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:32 AM
12

megazen/r/MensRights14/09/11 12:14 PM
12

megazen/r/MensRights05/08/11 10:03 PM
12

megazen/r/MensRights05/08/11 04:20 AM
11

megazen/r/MensRights27/06/11 05:40 AM
11

megazen/r/MensRights21/07/11 10:27 PM
11

megazen/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:31 AM
11

megazen/r/MensRights11/06/11 09:50 PM
11

megazen/r/MensRights01/12/11 11:43 PM
11

megazen/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:53 PM
11

megazen/r/MensRights06/09/11 03:39 PM
10

megazen/r/MensRights15/11/11 05:55 PM
10

megazen/r/MensRights29/07/11 01:07 PM
10

megazen/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:34 PM
10

megazen/r/MensRights22/06/11 07:50 PM
10

megazen/r/MensRights30/07/11 04:19 AM
9

megazen/r/MensRights07/08/12 08:26 PM
9

megazen/r/MensRights08/07/11 07:15 PM
9

megazen/r/MensRights02/06/11 01:15 AM
9

megazen/r/MensRights12/10/11 01:44 AM
9

megazen/r/MensRights26/07/11 06:53 AM
9

megazen/r/MensRights31/07/11 01:09 AM
9

megazen/r/MensRights06/09/11 04:11 PM
8

megazen/r/MensRights23/07/11 03:15 PM
8

megazen/r/MensRights26/05/11 12:33 PM
8

megazen/r/MensRights21/07/11 10:18 PM
8

megazen/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:49 PM
8

megazen/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:25 PM
8

megazen/r/MensRights04/06/11 01:31 PM
7

megazen/r/MensRights19/07/11 04:47 PM
7

megazen/r/MensRights05/12/11 01:28 AM
7

megazen/r/MensRights27/07/11 05:27 PM
7

megazen/r/MensRights13/06/11 01:54 AM
7

megazen/r/MensRights11/07/11 03:49 AM
7

megazen/r/MensRights10/06/11 10:01 PM
7

megazen/r/MensRights09/07/11 07:10 PM
7

megazen/r/MensRights04/06/11 12:58 PM
7

megazen/r/MensRights16/06/12 11:05 PM
6

megazen/r/MensRights14/07/11 01:07 PM
6

megazen/r/MensRights11/08/11 04:56 AM
6

megazen/r/MensRights01/06/12 11:32 AM
6

megazen/r/MensRights23/07/11 09:34 PM
6

megazen/r/MensRights30/06/11 02:53 AM
6

megazen/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:43 AM
6

megazen/r/MensRights31/07/11 10:44 PM
6

megazen/r/MensRights31/07/11 06:47 PM
6

megazen/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:12 PM
6

megazen/r/MensRights04/06/11 02:45 PM
5

megazen/r/MensRights27/06/11 05:47 AM
5

megazen/r/MensRights12/10/11 01:41 AM
5

megazen/r/MensRights09/08/11 01:59 AM
5

megazen/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:34 AM
5

megazen/r/MensRights22/06/11 07:44 PM
5

megazen/r/MensRights31/07/11 06:32 PM
5

megazen/r/MensRights05/08/11 10:09 PM
5

megazen/r/MensRights22/06/11 03:02 PM
5

megazen/r/MensRights05/09/12 08:21 AM
4

megazen/r/MensRights14/07/11 12:57 PM
4

megazen/r/MensRights11/08/11 05:21 AM
4

megazen/r/MensRights07/10/11 12:15 AM
4

megazen/r/MensRights10/09/11 12:54 PM
4

megazen/r/MensRights27/07/11 02:21 PM
4

megazen/r/MensRights13/06/11 02:38 AM
4

megazen/r/MensRights01/06/11 12:39 AM
4

megazen/r/MensRights06/08/12 06:24 AM
4

megazen/r/MensRights08/09/11 06:41 AM
4

megazen/r/MensRights29/06/11 01:23 AM
4

megazen/r/MensRights10/06/11 09:50 AM
3

megazen/r/MensRights18/07/11 07:30 PM
3

megazen/r/MensRights01/06/11 08:54 AM
3

megazen/r/MensRights21/09/11 10:09 AM
3

megazen/r/MensRights01/06/11 01:05 AM
3

megazen/r/MensRights31/07/11 10:08 PM
3

megazen/r/MensRights28/06/11 08:55 PM
3

megazen/r/MensRights06/09/11 07:06 PM
3

megazen/r/MensRights03/10/11 10:44 PM
2

megazen/r/MensRights07/07/11 10:54 PM
2

megazen/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:45 PM
2

megazen/r/MensRights11/06/11 12:56 PM
2

megazen/r/MensRights10/07/11 04:08 PM
2

megazen/r/MensRights19/09/11 02:34 PM
2

megazen/r/MensRights16/11/11 05:59 AM
2

megazen/r/MensRights04/06/11 04:50 PM
1

megazen/r/MensRights12/07/11 06:54 PM
1

megazen/r/MensRights05/10/11 09:28 PM
1

megazen/r/MensRights27/07/11 02:23 AM
1

megazen/r/MensRights13/10/11 09:03 PM
1

megazen/r/MensRights19/07/12 10:07 PM
1

megazen/r/MensRights19/09/11 02:05 PM
1

megazen/r/MensRights04/08/11 09:07 PM
0

megazen/r/MGTOW04/06/11 04:40 PM
0

megazen/r/MensRights27/06/11 05:28 AM
0

megazen/r/MensRights06/12/11 12:35 AM
0

megazen/r/MensRights28/10/11 03:44 AM
0

megazen/r/MensRights10/08/11 05:32 PM
0

megazen/r/MensRights28/07/11 07:11 PM
0

megazen/r/MensRights18/07/11 11:36 AM
0

megazen/r/MensRights18/07/11 10:37 AM
0

megazen/r/MensRights19/06/12 12:16 PM
0

megazen/r/MensRights18/07/11 10:18 AM
0

megazen/r/MensRights19/06/12 11:23 AM
0

megazen/r/MensRights07/07/11 08:03 PM
0

megazen/r/MensRights15/10/11 02:38 PM
0

megazen/r/MensRights23/08/12 10:02 PM
0

megazen/r/MensRights01/08/11 07:45 PM
0

megazen/r/MensRights20/09/11 09:17 PM
0

megazen/r/MensRights26/07/11 10:02 PM
0

megazen/r/MensRights29/06/11 05:06 PM
0

megazen/r/MensRights23/04/12 05:49 AM
0

megazen/r/MensRights29/09/11 02:56 PM
0

megazen/r/MensRights11/07/11 12:25 AM
0

megazen/r/MensRights31/07/11 01:06 AM
0

megazen/r/MensRights05/08/11 02:41 AM
0

megazen/r/MensRights09/07/11 10:56 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

The easier method usually becomes more popular overtime. Birthrates are already far below the minimum in developed countries. People generally prefer to use bicycles, motorbikes, cars and airplanes vs walking or riding horses. There would be a small percentage of exceptions though. The AW will do a lot more than just that in the future. It can enable near perfectly healthy offspring, since the device would give the best nutrients, be in the most stable and safe environment. Health issues can be …
/r/MensRights16/04/23 08:59 PM
1

As technology improves we can solve any health risks and problems. Natural pregnancy and birth won't go any faster or easier, because they're natural. Mothers do not consume the best nutrients for the fetus all the time. An artificial womb can give the exact dosage and best nutrients all the time. To make something better than natural requires to go beyond it. For example people used to ride animals for transportation. Then the car was invented (a mechanical vehicle) which can do a ton of things…
/r/MensRights16/04/23 04:11 AM
2

In the future those health risks will be reduced as the technology improves. Those health risks can only be substantially reduced by enabling reproduction externally like laying an egg. There is also problems with Artificial wombs as the bond between a mother and the baby in her womb cannot be replicated in Artificial wombs. The bond between parent and child occurs mostly after birth. Most people don't remember anything about their time as an infant. Adopted children can have just as strong bond…
/r/MensRights16/04/23 01:45 AM
3

'Female sperm', made from stem cells, could do away with men Female sperm doesn't solve any of the biggest bottlenecks: the health risks, burden and high cost of pregnancy and raising a child to adulthood. The artificial uterus would reduce all those downsides, stabilize the birthrate and population.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 12:49 AM
5

With artificial wombs on the horizon, will governments take direct control over population growth? That is a possible outcome. Natural pregnancy and raising babies is too slow, risky and a big burden on parents. It's also very expensive and time consuming. All the downsides means many adults choose to be childless. This has caused the fertility rate to drop below the minimum in developed countries. The population (work force, consumers) ages and shrinks. Artificial uteri would fix all these prob…
/r/MensRights16/04/23 12:32 AM
5

The domestic violence policies are one-sided in the UK and US. The punishment is harsher for men who are presumed guilty until proven innocent.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/22 04:25 PM
45

"the presiding judge ordered the wealthy ruler to pay the princess millions to carry out the lifestyle to which she and her children had become accustomed." The Emirati Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum paid for Princess Haya's lavish lifestyle, she cheated on him for years with a bodyguard yet still is entitled to receive $734 million. She deserves a tiny fraction of that since she had an affair. The UK family courts are unaccountable, corrupt and just want to transfer wealth to the spouse …
/r/PussyPassDenied21/12/21 02:38 PM
2

Terrible that it happened to him. He married the wrong person and the courts rewarded the bad behavior.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/21 09:12 AM
1

Emilia Clarke is a much better actress for the movie.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/02/21 11:15 PM
1

You should add references to the image and what country this applies to for credibility.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 08:11 AM
1

This dialogue is not in the movie.
/r/MGTOW21/08/17 05:28 PM
4

Congrats. It was created by yours truly 6 years ago.
/r/MGTOW29/07/17 12:48 PM
1

Congrats.
/r/MGTOW29/07/17 12:47 PM
2

Whelp if only fathers were treated the same as mothers by the courts and laws.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/17 02:09 PM
5

Sexist double standards.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 06:26 PM
1

You could've done small talk first, ask her if she has a BF or is seeing someone. If not then ask her out.
/r/seduction31/10/15 11:37 AM
23

"Hillary Clinton suggested women are owed money due to gender income disparities in a fiery campaign speech on Tuesday." Women do the far majority of consumer spending. How is that possible when women do more part-time jobs or stay at home? Because men pay for their extra spending. Income disparities are due to different choices in life. Women put priority on more time with their family and friends than working.
/r/MGTOW24/04/15 09:27 AM
1

You should discuss this with the moderators of TIL and get it approved.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 12:42 PM
2

Amen to that. Nobody should be forced to do a job. If it's really a just cause then people will volunteer for it.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 10:35 AM
2

Fantastic, it's about time they treated fathers as equally suitable parents and end the gender bias.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 03:18 AM
1

All people naturally have a right to life. If they commit crimes they should pay for that. Anyone who advocates to kill people based on their race, gender or creed is evil. Men always needed to prove themselves to attract a mate. Women only had to act nice and be attractive to get men to take care of them. The male drive to prove your worth is so strong that it propels men take more risks in life. that's why men have made most inventions, the biggest achievements and discoveries during all of hu…
/r/MGTOW15/05/14 08:51 PM
3

, when much of the issue is that working people have been undermined by failure to organize and demand their government work on their behalf The US has 17+ trillion dollar national debt and much more unfunded obligations. That has been accumulated by the reckless welfare state. Future generations of Americans must repay the debt or the US will declare bankruptcy. The average income of full-time workers decreased since women massively entered the job market (post WW2). In the past only the husban…
/r/MGTOW30/04/14 08:27 AM
2

"Free will" is really just a phrase we have invented to describe what happens when a human brain takes in information, processes the information, and produces an output behavior. It is not just a phrase, because any sentient makes their own decisions and responsible for such.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 07:29 AM
6

Birthrates can only be stable again by respecting father's rights and shared parenting with family court reform. Birthrates will drop if men continue to be penalized for being fathers, denied access to their kids post-divorce. The amount of productive men in society declines too.
/r/MGTOW25/08/13 12:20 AM
-4

That doesn't make it right to censor users for posting an article which is published on a mainstream media site. And they threaten users who oppose feminism with permanent bans. There's nothing wrong with that article. Facebook caved into feminist censorship. Please copy and share this.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 11:18 AM
2

Every baby naturally inherits a combination of their father's and mother's DNA. If men, and humans in general, want to surpass natural humanity they need to abandon natural pregnancy. Such as be born via something else such as artificial wombs which will be better, safer and cheaper than natural pregnancy. Sex would be for pleasure only. Then man will be free of his natural shackles and be reborn into something new e.g. the neo-man. The gender war ends, because gender itself becomes insignifican…
/r/MGTOW29/07/13 09:02 AM
3

They're hypocrites, because if the genders were reversed they wouldn't complain like that one bit. They're disrespectful of the baby's natural gender and offensive.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:39 PM
2

Yes you should have left and ended the relationship. Being a man is standing up for yourself, go your own way, be self-sufficient, not a doormat.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:56 PM
1

Why is he a MGTOW champion?
/r/MGTOW27/11/12 06:03 PM
1

Locking away people who make false abuse allegations deters people from doing such a terrible crime!
/r/MensRights23/11/12 04:08 PM
5

Great, thanks for taking the time to think for yourself, and understand men's rights better! Of course men are not "the enemy" (awful misandric feminist myth), they've always complemented each other to become much more together. You should enlighten more people and improve the world.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:43 PM
1

Wait for the pill for men.
/r/MGTOW20/11/12 08:47 PM
2

China has a massive overpopulation problem (1.3 billion Chinese). They don't need that. There's cases of men who donated sperm and are now forced to pay child support. It's a trap. If any guy can donate sperm... the quality won't be any good.
/r/MGTOW20/11/12 08:36 PM
3

I thought there was already major opposition to such intrusive feminist meddling with businesses? When such western companies start losing due to having the wrong people in boards (not based on merit, but gender). Then it will be abolished sooner than later.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:33 PM
1

You should let the people decide of the subreddit, not you. They will downvote it if they're tired of it.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 03:02 PM
1

This is not a rage comic. It explains a serious problem in simple form. You shouldn't remove it! Otherwise you needlessly censor this subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:04 PM
2

Yeah that's so wrong, it's not even funny.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 08:19 AM
16

Yes sue them too.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:04 AM
1

Is there a graph about total rape by gender which includes male rape victims in prisons?
/r/MensRights23/08/12 11:36 PM
1

Oh so it's supposed to be a key. Cause it reminds me of a quite similar misandric image which is a big female gender symbol with a small male symbol attached to it.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 11:26 PM
3

The Guardian doesn't bother to interview men's rights organizations about this issue in the UK.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:13 PM
2

Alright I just sent it.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:29 AM
2

You're welcome. P.S. a while ago I requested to exchange links with /r/mensrights and the new men's rights community on EpicTopic www.epictopic.com/mensrights . I sent a message to the mods a while ago. Can we please do this?
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:29 AM
8

This article is related to men's rights, because it partially explains the disintegration of african american families due to the excessive welfare by big government, and excessive economic/family regulations. The black communities were among the first to disintegrate because of feminist policies which corrupted the institution of marriage. And this proces was funded and supported by the government. Walter E. Williams: the welfare state is an equal opportunity family destroyer. Today's illegitim…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:53 AM
2

I highly doubt that study. Did they check all those cases of babies who died of circumcision due to excessive blood loss, botched circumcisions that harmed their penises which cannot be fixed, the psychological impact of such an extremely painful and needless procedure on babies, the cost of gradual loss of sensitivity of circumcised penises etc. The bottomline is it violates the babies right to bodily integrity and violates his will.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 02:18 AM
12

It does not "cost billions" extra. In fact it saves money. Because unnecessary circumcision costs time, money, doctors who perform the barbaric procedure, and some babies die due to too much blood loss.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:41 AM
2

Good that you changed your mind. rilakkuma1 > I had been sexually objectified by complete strangers since I went through puberty. You forget that men are objectified for their success (Success Objects).
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:27 AM
2

You should give it a shot. It's not that hard to setup, but you need likeable hosts who know their stuff, a decent camera and equipment. I recon to cover some men's entertainment too. Later you can get sponsors.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 07:55 AM
2

Yes they should do a video format on youtube, and twitch.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:01 AM
1

He's pretty good, but only has 5,613 subscribers. And his show is quite amateurish.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:00 AM
1

Should post this video there Meet the Female Paedophile
/r/MensRights20/08/12 01:44 AM
1

The other post you refer to is by an other user who has his own blog. The point is for mutual support and more awareness.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:10 AM
1

This was posted by a user. People shouldn't be censored. However, his topic should be downvoted.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:57 PM
0

It's just catering to men.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 02:20 PM
1

Yeah it's not important, but it'd be more efficient to say "people" instead of men and women. If it's only men or women then that's appropriate.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 02:37 PM
2

Send in complaints to get the author fired.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 11:22 PM
2

We live in a capitalistic and consumeristic society That's Crony Capitalism (Fascism) nowadays. The merger of government with corporate interests due to big government.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:36 AM
6

Unpaid bodyguards.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 11:32 PM
10

Hope they ban this barbaric practice of unnecessary genital mutilation of babies regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 03:57 PM
2

With the high rate of male student dropouts, underperforming, millions of fatherless homes, 3 times higher male suicide rate, feminized education... it screws up results. It would be a national issue if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 03:48 PM
2

Thanks, okay that convinced me to remove him as mod of /r/MGTOW. Who else should be a mod there?
/r/MensRights22/07/12 11:03 AM
1

He did post good content in the subreddit. So I'm unsure.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 08:40 AM
1

if that is the case then who should replace his role as moderator of MGTOW sub?
/r/MensRights21/07/12 08:27 AM
2

Ever since Viperz became a mod, the sub appears to have improved in content and style. Why would it be a troll sub? Cause that's not the purpose.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 08:22 AM
2

Marriage does too.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 08:36 AM
3

Did it also teach you to never marry again and to tell people to avoid modern western marriage?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 08:35 AM
3

Good luck, I hope you realize the winners in divorces are the judges and lawyers. You better have a Prenuptial Agreement.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 08:35 AM
1

Yeah, rest of the article is good though.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 01:48 PM
2

A classic quote by hypocritical feminist Hillary Clinton.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 02:06 PM
1

You should do some research about it yourself. Example: You are comparing apples to oranges the problem is not the lack of convictions but overwhelming amount of false allegations which turned into innocent people being arrested, locked up etc. Even when the allegations turns out false there's countless examples where the false accuser walks away free, or gets a slap on the wrist. Some examples: About Half of Rape Allegations are False, Research Shows False allegations of rape are believed to be…
/r/MensRights24/06/12 01:49 PM
6

Meanwhile the objectification of men as success objects is rarely discussed. It's routinely ignored by feminists.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:58 PM
2

Well done meeting the kickstarter funding goal!
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:48 PM
1

First of all the overwhelming majority of rape allegations have turned out to be false based on various studies. And now with DNA testing it can disprove accusations if they turn out false. DNA evidence Will be present. If there's some gray area, that's for the judge to decide. Both must be considered innocent until proven guilty. Point is if a person makes a false rape allegation then she (sometimes he) should be punished as harshly as a rapist. Now false rape accusers often get away with rape.…
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:47 PM
1

Once you understand that you and I agree on this point, Okay then sorry for the confusion. I don't know what the disagreement was about in this case.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:22 PM
1

Yes because you don't understand what the concept of Proof vs words vs innocent until PROVEN guilty means. That's the crux of hte current problem and issues. Men (mostly) are considered Guilty based on only words! Then the burden is on them to prove they're innocent. It's turned upside down!
/r/MensRights21/06/12 07:53 PM
0

You don't know how it works, because Words = Not evidence! That is called an accusation. That is precisely why someone should not be considered guilty as with rape or abuse allegations based on mere words! If you can't understand this then don't reply.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:13 PM
0

What "signs" of sexual intercourse? Check some articles about this. There's definately medical evidence to be found, including DNA, signs of intercourse etc. But two wrongs do not make a right; They are not stripped from the accuser it merely requires to show more Evidence vs mere WORDS!! Please stop wasting my time.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 01:57 PM
-1

How? Lack of physical evidence could just prove that she doesn't tear easily, and that he used a condom. A condom doesn't prevent DNA evidence, signs of sexual intercourse etc. If you mean the person accused of rape, absolutely. But the accuser is protected under that same principle. Yes and this doesn't happen yet in practice, because of VAWA etc.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 10:53 PM
0

and cases where she refuses to recant and it cannot be proven that she lied and so the prosecutor's hands are tied. It usually can be proven with sufficient research and medical checks. In anyway the accused must Always be considered innocent until proven guilty. It should not no different here. There's too many cases of false abuse accusations based on mere words already.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 08:27 PM
1

Yes the accused must always be considered innocent until Proven guilty. This doesn't occur with rape accusations which are frequently mere words. The false accuser tends to go unpunished or slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 11:14 AM
10

The Brian Banks kickstarter should be posted in more subreddits to increase support.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:46 AM
2

They should do mandatory medical check and DNA test (on the accuser) at least.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 08:42 PM
44

Take it up to the European Court of Justice if you have to. You must create awareness, a movement to change these feminist policies which protect false rape accusers, presumes men guilty without proof, so it doesn't happen again. Edit: did she walk away unpunished? Then it could be a matter of time till another innocent guy suffers.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 11:50 AM
153

Another case of a false rape allegations where the accuser gives no proof, only words. The accused is considered guilty. Best thing you can do is get a lawyer, and more importantly create awareness for this problem of false rape allegations. Send your story to big newspapers, media in Denmark. Get laws changed so false accusers are punished and must give proof!
/r/MensRights19/06/12 11:42 AM
6

Fo real change and improvements vote Ron Paul! Stop overspending, reduce the national debt, Imperial wars, balanced budget, shrink big government.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 11:03 PM
17

So this sick mother is in prison?
/r/MensRights15/06/12 11:04 AM
3

Finally some common sense!
/r/MensRights13/06/12 09:21 PM
1

Better would be a formal complaint to BU.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 12:37 AM
1

They got the third one right, don't marry!! If you do get a prenup, and only do the ceremony.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:20 PM
2

Where's the: you hold the power to stop false rape allegations versions? And there's been cases with male rape victims yet they don't label the female sex offender as a rapist.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:20 AM
2

Please make a bigger version of this with large text below.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 11:39 PM
-4

You should make an image of this and add that title with a black background and white border. Like this.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 09:28 PM
2

Yeah they already made functioning artificial wombs in Australia for endangered sharks. So it's easy to imagine this technology to be further developed into an advanced version for human offspring in the future. Farther in the future, there will likely be the Singularity which is merger of humans with machines. And later instant mind transfer of humans into cloned or grown bodies so humans can live much longer.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 09:02 PM
1

Ishihara's statement is rediculous and doesn't help at all. To stop the low birthrates in Japan, the Japanese should invent practical artificial wombs for couples, so they can have children and keep working = win for the Japanese citizens, women are not burdened with risk of natural pregnancy, and government continues to receive taxes with a stable population thanks to artificial womb departments in local hospitals of cities and towns. Asia will most likely be the first region to use mass scale …
/r/MensRights14/05/12 07:31 PM
2

Artificial wombs are inevitable because they will be far superior to natural reproduction. For example: any genetic or birth defects can be fixed, 24/7 observation to provide optimal nutrition in a more stable environment, ability to enhance offspring = better than natural born humans). It will be much more advanced and provide much healthier, superior (enhanced) offspring than natural pregnancy ever can. Because natural born people are always flawed for their genetic or birth defecs couldn't be…
/r/MensRights14/05/12 07:14 PM
11

You should file a formal complaint and add below that: "Dudette tips: women can rape too, and most false abuse allegations are filled by dudettes."
/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:12 AM
1

Yeah, a big problem is tax payer funded governmental feminism is a tool for the "divide and conquer strategy" to control the masses. Therefore feminism doesn't seek harmony or unity, they usually pit men and women against each other with half-truths and lies, and fail (or refuse) to understand that we're actually a team with the same roots.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 02:58 PM
1

Men and women do excell in certain tasks more than others. Men and women are equal but different. Differences should be embraced not ignored as feminists try to do. Their brains, interests, goals are somewhat different etc (see the feminist myth of the unisex brain).
/r/MensRights05/05/12 02:44 PM
20

That's false, the fundamental template starts in its earliest stage as gender neutral, then later it evolves into either male or female. The bottomline is we're all humans, no matter if you're male, female, transgendered, hermafrodite etc.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 02:38 PM
-1

Her statements are false and misandric. And the word "women" contains "men" so she should hate herself if she can't even handle that. ;)
/r/MensRights05/05/12 02:38 PM
-12

You should make the names visible of those who said that so we know who these misandric saddists are.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 02:34 PM
2

There´s still the taboo to investigate child abuse by nuns which has occured as well in various countries.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 08:15 AM
2

Get in touch with Fathers & Families and National Coalition for Men they maybe able to help you. And support Shared Parenting, Family Court Reform!
/r/MensRights23/04/12 05:50 AM
2

Wait so 70%+ of consumer spending is done by women, climate change has NOTHING to do with feminism, yet they make it a feminist issue to get more tax payer funding to feminist organizations in the EU. This is pure feminist corruption and money grabbing here.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 05:33 AM
1

It was not slavery at all. And historically men were tasked to provide and protect their wife, and family with their life. So it's again more lies, misinformation by feminist Sheila Cronin.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 12:35 AM
3

Post some Feminist Quotes, that will show such ignorant people. Secondly, it is very sexist to moronically assume that one gender cannot be sexist, or that the other is only sexist.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 12:40 AM
5

Depends on where you live, prostitution is among the oldest professions in history and should be legal, because sex workers deserve equal rights and support. It will always exist until the end of humans.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 05:40 PM
2

That's more than enough evidence to sue her to repay all damages and then some.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:05 AM
1

Well you could also tell others who know her about it, and explain why you did that. Maybe she can still change for the better if more people comment on that.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 07:14 AM
0

Maybe Fathers & Families can help you, check it out!
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:11 PM
0

That's awful, you should show your mom how bad of a person she is for doing that.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:10 PM
6

The false rape accuser got away unpunished though.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 04:24 PM
1

Good, next time make the title a bit shorter and to the point. :)
/r/MensRights22/03/12 09:29 PM
2

You should delete your post and repost it with correct title. Also the same should hold true for biological mothers. No sexist double standards.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 06:46 PM
0

She describes things too elaborately to make a point when it could've been condensed in a much shorter time span.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 11:54 AM
1

Guys post this around, not only here.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 10:07 AM
1

She makes good points, but also too elaborately discusses an issue.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 09:59 AM
1

This is not a trustworthy contraception method, and can be harmful in various ways.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 02:43 AM
6

If a man did that to a stewardess I doubt that would be the outcome.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 07:19 PM
1

The politicians responsible for this are traitors to all men and grandparents in Britain and must be held accountable for their sexism!
/r/MensRights10/11/11 02:10 PM
2

Where's his father? Also use this guide The Art of Manliness: Classic Skills and Manners for the Modern Man
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:23 PM
-1

This subreddit is what is explained in the description. It's not another r/rights4men . Your assumption is flawed.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 12:35 PM
-1

Don't write off an entire subreddit, because you see one mod there that you don't like.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 12:14 PM
1

It's to meet demand for people who want to ask questions to learn more, even newbie ones which wouldn't be relevant in /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 11:06 AM
1

It's really simple. askmensrights focuses on answering Questions, while /r/mensrights is more a combination with news. There's a demand to just have questions answered too.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 11:04 AM
1

My main point is not, wah wah men had this bad or wah wah women had that bad. My point re patriarchy is that it's operating on the level of the social order. It's systemic. Nope, the blame patriarchy is an utter myth. We don't live in a patriarchy at all. If anything it resembles more of a matriarchy than anything else: 1. women have majority vote, 2. special privileges, and support for women only, 3. millions of tax payer money goes to organizations for women who have radical leaders such as NO…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 07:05 PM
2

You talk about "the patriarchy" as if it's a secret cabal of men tweaking society to oppress women and that's absurd. No that's not what I said. My point is that in western society, the social order where women are an active part of the work force and have meaningful legal and property rights is relatively recent. Human Rights, democracy did not really exist in the past as it is applied or upholded today with the rule of law. Men and women each had specific roles to fulfill in the past. Men coul…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 02:07 PM
1

Explain to her that domestic violence is initiated about 50%/50% by men and women. Show her some videos, articles. I understand your dismay at such a response from your own daughter, but it's also a good moment to educate her that domestic violence is not a one-sided issue.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 01:39 PM
0

Read the comments below the article. I'm not a vaccine expert though.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 01:33 PM
3

I'm doing much more constructive things than you with your blame the imaginary patriarchy nonsense.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 01:31 PM
-1

Some claim this vaccine has many potential side-effects though.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 01:01 PM
3

If you paid attention and read the OP you would know we don't have a patriarchal system at all. And again you put the blame on men and patriarchy which is standard feminist speak.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 12:51 PM
2

If white people were as discriminated as men are in the United States, then they'd surely deserve it.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 12:59 AM
1

There's still no Men's Rights Committee eh?
/r/MensRights26/10/11 04:32 PM
2

Yeah you can ask a mod or add to the FAQ.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 04:29 PM
29

There's more info about that here: http://asu.orgsync.com/org/mrmg/home Feminists and society like to say we live in a Patriarchy. Because men hold more leadership positions than women. But why are all the gender concerns towards women only? None for men! NO UN panels, NO national committees, NO State organizations, NO university departments. None. All for women! Excuse me, What "Patriarchy"??? • Men and Fathers face the harshest discrimination in family courts. [17] [18] • Epidemic of false acc…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 03:45 AM
3

A big men's health issue is the hazardous pesticides on foods which harms male fertility, and female fertility too.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 11:10 AM
1

Still waiting for the Pill for Men. It's coming out soon in Asia.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 11:08 AM
1

Give a couple of examples when they ask about it. Do some clue batting. You support individual liberty of all people, gender neutral laws, no sexist double standards or privileges.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 11:03 AM
1

Well they own a lot, but not all citizens of America. On the bright side, in time Rockefeller and their entire family will become nothing but history.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 06:33 PM
2

She could also be a transsexual. There is no real rise of that though.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 02:46 PM
1

I don't think so, because for example caucasian people of which the Rockefeller family, and feminism itself originates from are becoming a minority worldwide. Western civilization is in decline, especially in Britain, and the US due to reckless feminism too.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 02:42 AM
1

You should video record, or audio when you have sex just in case.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 02:20 AM
1

Divide and conquer doesn't work, cause it destroys societies and civilizations, which they're finding out after decades.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 02:05 AM
2

Just like some nazi policy to only allow specific races.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:59 AM
2

Usually the low-class, and low educated have most children of any country. People will have babies until there are no more people, or perhaps when people stop dying of old age or use external wombs to grow them.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:54 AM
3

You have my sympathy Scott. Based on your story your grandfather was a great, and real man.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:47 AM
0

Warren Farrell is former feminist though. Yeah the few good ones need to speak up against radical feminism leaders.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:42 AM
1

Wives also spend the majority of household income, while the husband works more, and finances the housewife lifestyle of his wife who therefore doesn't need to hold a job at a company.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:28 AM
1

It is gender neutral depending on the context.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 02:17 AM
4

It's not okay to hit a woman and vice versa. Only exception is self defense, if your life, safety is in danger.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 12:55 PM
5

Exactly, the excuse of alleged "abuse" is never a valid reason to hire someone to murder that person.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 02:24 PM
1

Why would you assume that the pill for men in the works in Indonesia does that? There's no information about that.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 09:33 AM
1

That's not better than Pills to me, because that requires surgery.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:09 AM
1

Yeah, did you post a comment at that article?
/r/MensRights05/10/11 12:22 AM
6

"family values" are worth little when the chances are high that you get divorced, become a walking ATM machine, can't see your kids, get false allegations against you etc.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 12:20 AM
1

JackieSmith7, and tallis on CNN are very misandric and illogical.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 11:40 PM
1

And enough money to fund the lawsuit.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 06:28 AM
3

The publication of this top-level report on men's health in the EU is still an important milestone.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 01:25 PM
0

The father should have a say in the decision making when the couple is married. When the mother is underage, the parents should decide on that.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 11:15 PM
5

That''s bogus shaming language when they run out of real arguments.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:53 AM
2

X-post from fathers4equality.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:35 AM
9

Report that image, and call her out for misandry.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:30 AM
1

It'll be used en-mass I'm sure. They're already rolling it out soon in Indonesia. So expect it to appear in Asia first. Then later become available in the west.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:07 AM
2

Still awaiting The Pill for men.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 03:02 PM
3

Gents; post this in some other sub-reddits too.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 02:59 PM
2

That''s due to the inherently misandric, feminist ideology.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 02:57 PM
1

Well done!
/r/MensRights27/09/11 09:23 AM
2

Feminism is about "freedom for women" within the constraints of radical feminist ideology, while severely neglecting men.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:52 AM
1

As I said before. If you speak any of those Scandinavian languages you could help by telling the other side of the story about men's issues, by translating important men's rights studies, documents so they can understand it.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:39 PM
2

I'm a peaceful person, but I know Iceland society won't last with such extreme gender laws. Forming a group is a good idea. However, it will probably take time as feminist ideology is well presented and generally accepted by a lot of people. Right, so clearly Iceland, and perhaps also Sweden, Norway can use men's rights organizations which tell the other side of the story in their native languages. If you speak any of those Scandinavian languages you could help with that. And translate important…
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:38 PM
3

Equality is then interperated by the same goverment institutions that should keep tabs on gender issues, not as equal rights but equal status. This must be abolished at whatever cost. It is gender communism. The worst form of feminism. You should start a group, movement for True Equality: equal opportunity, and rights, but outcome is based on a person's performance regardless of gender. Clearly this may require a politicial organization or at least a group (of influential people) which supports …
/r/MensRights24/09/11 02:38 PM
2

Well do whatever is possible. Get a group together. Just stop this sexism in Nordic countries!
/r/MensRights24/09/11 02:35 PM
1

Why is this only on a blog?
/r/MensRights24/09/11 02:09 PM
1

Sue them for sexist preferential treatment of women, and discrimination against men. That is the only way to stop such sexist acts.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 01:52 PM
2

Yeah, an other big reason is because men do the most dangerous, hazardous, risky jobs. Suicide rate is also significantly higher among men.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 11:24 PM
1

Well it'd be a big improvement you know. As women work more the life-expectancy gap goes down.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 08:32 PM
6

It's a real shame that these women cannot handle true equality: such as equal pension age.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 09:58 AM
3

Yet the other 1/3rd is not reserves for men, meaning men must still compete for any seat, while 1/3rd are exclusively for women.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 02:31 PM
1

Okay, you make some good points. I will perhaps post a reply later. A. Required to have parental consent when under the legal age of consent for an abortion. B. Required to have a husband's approval if married for an abortion. C. Single unmarried women at legal age of consent are not required to have such. These points are still important though, for e.g. fathers to have some influence over their baby too.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 09:39 AM
1

More sexist double standards.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 01:05 PM
1

All those dysfunctional bastard children from broken single mother families that harm countries such as what occurred in the UK recently.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 12:18 PM
2

This is very hypocritical: men build civilization, cities, technology, invent almost everything from law, human rights, logistics, electricity, computers etc. they are the engine of human advancement, and have been, protecting, providing for women since the dawn of mankind. Men even empower women, for feminism was even initially funded by big organizations created by men (and arguably the brain-child of 17th century Victorian men). What other current lopsided situation would you expect when gove…
/r/MensRights15/09/11 12:13 PM
0

Women prefer safety and stability, so let men do risky stuff, and don't want to take up responsibility as much, while they reap the rewards.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:53 AM
2

That's not really what a man is, but what misandric people, radical feminism wants you to believe. And, America, Britain, Australia is not the whole world.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:46 AM
10

If a guy tolerates such disrespect while helping someone, he's a spineless mangina.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:45 AM
8

It's mostly Muslim immigrants in Europe who do circumcision mutilation on defenseless boys.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:38 AM
4

I don't know enough about China to say, and your statement doesn't convince me that you do. No, women do all sorts of jobs go to university, college as well. So by making such laws gender neutral it is light years ahead because it does not impose specific gender roles via laws onto people. Also, I doubt you have read about how guys in China have a hard time to buy a big enough house and stuff to attract women to be with them.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 12:56 PM
2

They are because women in urban areas also hold jobs, complete studies. So claiming that they don't or cannot work due to old cultural pressure is false.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 12:38 PM
1

The human rights problem of prison rape is still a big problem and a big, under-reported human rights issue in America.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 05:17 PM
4

women-only session at party conference. They call that equality? Give me a break. Privileged princesses.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 07:58 PM
0

she slapped and pushed her husband for wanting a divorce. Case of domestic violence against men.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 11:48 AM
2

Thanks for pointing that out. Honor killings are terrible. Aside from that obligatory paternity testing is something western countries can learn from.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 09:52 PM
3

Don't confuse WRA with feminism though, for feminism has been hijacked by radicals during the second wave. They are different.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 02:58 PM
4

It would be better to call yourself an egalitarian, women's rights activist instead of feminist.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 06:58 AM
5

They're the sole perpetrators of paternity fraud, because a biological child is naturally theirs. Only the father can be duped into raising somebody else's child.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 06:57 AM
0

This is from 2008, so quite old.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 06:55 AM
3

This is called Gender Communism which is popular among radicals, and destructive to economies, human liberty, and societies.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 06:42 AM
2

I had unsafe sex with a woman who claimed to be completely infertile... How can you be so foolish to believe that? Always use a rubber. You're lucky the baby isn't yours, and you should do a background check on people. It's not your responsibility to act like captain save-a-hoe.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 06:35 AM
1

Women want and choose to stay at home with the children instead of pursuing a career, and b) Men would prefer to spend more time with their children, but are prevented from doing so due to their spouse's preferences. There are some issues with using these dubious claims as an argument against temporary alimony. The Fact is women prefer to spend more time with children, and work less which reflects job statistics = more part-time working women, while men do more full-time for they have little oth…
/r/MensRights07/09/11 09:37 AM
2

RE Points 1 & 2: Your argument is based on your assertion that women choose to be at home and men are at work against their will. No, it's the general preference of women to spend more time with children, work part-time at some company or less if possible, and less desire to be the main breadwinner. So the husband in general has no viable option to be a househusband. If you don't believe me look at any big city. Count how many househusbands there are with full-time working wives vs the opposite …
/r/MensRights07/09/11 12:10 AM
2

Please show me the peer-reviewed study showing that most fathers were forced into having a career by their spouse, whom had all the decision-making power and the luxury of choice. They were not forced, but usually had no other viable options. Just look at employment statistics. You will rarely find the mother chooses to work full-time so the husband can be a househusband. You'll see fathers work far more full-time, and of course many would rather spend more time with their kids if possible. You …
/r/MensRights06/09/11 10:35 PM
2

Shouldn't child support be capped at reasonable amount? Absolutely, and also safety check so see what the CS money is spent on. Also a limit to stop ex-spouses from claiming vast amounts of wealth from their former spouse when they've contributed little to accomplish it.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 07:58 PM
1

I've never seen a frenchwoman being forced by court to pay a husband damages for lack of sex.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 02:41 PM
-1

All nonsense based on your personal biases. You are assuming that the bread-winner is particularly hard working and was forced into a job by the lazy home-maker, who has all the choice and no responsibility. Sorry this is not nonsense at all. It's usually the father who sacrifices time with the kids to work more to support the family. Never debated this, irrelevant. It's related, so not irrelevant, because if you're tricked into supporting a kid that isn't yours for years; that would be very har…
/r/MensRights06/09/11 11:19 AM
-5

However, I think that there is a certain fairness in temporary alimony when a partner has stunted their career in order to fulfill a home-making role in a marriage. The other spouse (usually the father) didn't go to work voluntarily, worked extra hard, and gave up precious free time to be with the kids to provide financial security and safety. Meanwhile the other one (usually the mother) had the luxury to choose to work full-time, part-time or be a housewife. I have no idea if that is the case w…
/r/MensRights05/09/11 08:33 AM
0

Not trying to, but your statement is vague. a parent has moral and legal obligations to share their wealth with their child. Of course, but realize NO Child needs $15 million in support. This game is about vast wealth transfers to the ex, you see. It goes beyond any reasonable amount that a child actually needs. This is why child support limits should be reasonable regardless of how wealthy a parent is. No child should be used for extortion tactics. That CS money could be spent on luxurious vaca…
/r/MensRights05/09/11 08:13 AM
-1

The point is it's the property of whomever earned it. The kid did not whatsoever. You use your comparison to try to justify the transfer to some kid who did not do a single thing to earn such vast amounts of wealth yet.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 08:07 AM
-1

The adult made that money so it belongs to the person who earned it.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 07:52 AM
0

Exactly, there should be a fixed limit to child support payments, no matter how wealthy the parent who pays is. No child needs $750k. There's no safety measures to see if the money is spent on the child as intended.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 09:29 AM
3

Right, so there isn't a religious nor medical reason for most people. Enough reason that eventually circumcision on all minors will be banned (except if really necessary).
/r/MensRights02/09/11 08:23 PM
1

A cruel, outdated tradition among mostly religious people.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 06:27 AM
3

So when the chivalrous old guard fades away, a ban on circumcision is more achievable.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:08 PM
3

I think the origin of this case is mostly American conservatism and religious influence on circumcision.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 08:53 PM
1

Police should not be horribly gender biased like that.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 07:30 PM
1

Goes to show how sexist the American Police is, because they don''t approach each case in a gender-neutral manner.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:29 AM
2

Many thanks for all the work, and things you''ve done for men's rights, human rights and True Equality. Bit strange that this wasn''t posted by his original username though.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:08 AM
2

This bill must be overturned in e.g. the Supreme Court, because the California State Senate does not represent the will of the people in California, uses double standards, and false statements about "benefits".
/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:05 AM
1

Well, men are sort of the protectors, creators and engine of human advancement. While women are like stabilizers, somewhat stagnant who put safety first.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 04:19 PM
4

Great article. But taking chances like that would be stupid, from the perspective of a biological organism seeking to reproduce. They might drown or be killed by savages or catch a disease. For women, the optimal thing to do is go along with the crowd, be nice, play it safe. The odds are good that men will come along and offer sex and you’ll be able to have babies. All that matters is choosing the best offer. We’re descended from women who played it safe. This part is one of the secrets of why m…
/r/MensRights28/08/11 09:34 AM
1

I would never be friends with such a sexist person, who does not allow people of a specific gender to a wedding. This is like a Nazi who doesn't allow non-whites.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 12:06 AM
1

Yeah, the divorce industry, family courts considers fathers and the main breadwinner as walking ATM machines. It also has some negative consequences for girls who are more likely to become dysfunctional. This causes the decline of countries and civilizations.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 06:15 AM
4

Nevertheless back in the day, rampaging youth delinquents was much more uncommon. The rise of UK's youth crime rates is in direct correlation with millions of broken and dysfunctional families. Such youth gangs who wreck neighborhoods is much less likely to occur in countries with predominantly strong families like China, and Malaysia.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 05:29 AM
0

Violent youth gangs like this who rampage in cities is abnormal, and youth used to be more disciplined. Youth is still more disciplined in many other countries with a strong family base.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 04:53 AM
-1

Completely disregarding something, because it was published in daily mail is not a fair argument. They have the guts to report stuff that much of the main-stream media would not dare too. Granted the OP shouldn't blame all this solely on feminism though.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 04:51 AM
-5

This is about providing a parade for people of other orientations too. It's not against gays at all.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 06:24 PM
1

Guys who under perform in Britain due to feminized education styles, are more likely to drop out, and does tremendous harm to the British economy, as they become liabilities instead of productive assets. They're hurting themselves, and will need millions of new immigrants for their economy which will further change British culture, norms and values, and also undo these sexist bearers.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 05:21 PM
1

There's definitely misandric remarks in this article, which is easily exposed by changing the gender. People need to complain against them for that.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 05:07 PM
2

There's an article about a woman who falsely accused her father of sexual abuse here: Memoirs: "My Lie": Why I falsely accused my father.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 03:25 AM
2

Yeah, surrogate mothers are more expensive in western countries. See e.g. Nicole Kidman, and her husband Keith Urban who used a surrogate mother.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 01:48 PM
2

Yeah these two health issues are somewhat related too, and could be under an overarching category.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 12:32 PM
3

It'll take at least 30-50 years for the artificial womb, growth of embryos externally (ectogenesis) to be viable.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 11:38 AM
2

Yeah, agreed.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 04:29 AM
3

It would be considered impolite, rude if a male host did that on TV, unless he brought it in a funny manner. Gotta say that man is handsome.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 02:43 AM
3

That's one of many reasons. There's a sore lack of funding for Men's Health, see e.g. disparity between prostate cancer funding vs breast cancer. Men do most crucial dangerous, hazardous jobs, men usually must work full-time which lowers their life-expectancy too. It's also males who more often risk their lives to provide and protect their families. Men have to earn their position in society to attract partners too. It's not puzzling at all.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 02:40 AM
5

Christine Lagarde made very misandric comments about men after she became IMF chief, calling too many men in the top "testosterone poison". If any man said anything misogynistic like that about women like "estrogen poison" he would have lost his career, and reputation. She also used a fake opportunity to gain that position while the previous IMF chief was false accused of sexual abuse. I have no sympathy for Christine Lagarde, and hope she pays for her bad karma.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 11:22 PM
1

I think if you make the sub-reddit more interesting, I mean some uplifting submissions that could help. Also exchange links with other related sub-reddits.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 11:06 AM
4

While feminists complain about inequality, men are building civilization
/r/MensRights04/08/11 10:43 AM
-1

It looks much better. Maybe add a bit of blue to the logo.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 10:22 AM
1

Such favoritism based on network, connections, friendship also happens among women. It's not uncommon. Quotas is systematic discrimination based on gender, and in favor of one gender such as women. It's similar as White People Only Areas like in South Africa during Apartheid. My point is: people should NEVER be discriminated against with quotas based on their gender, race, religion etc!
/r/MensRights04/08/11 09:49 AM
1

Then they should work to reduce such alliance network, nepotism. This has always existed throughout the world though. Applying gender sexism, with enforced quotas is wrong is very wrong, and against equal treatment of all people.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 09:37 AM
1

Cool, do you live in Germany?
/r/MensRights04/08/11 09:14 AM
2

All people should earn their positions in society, based on merit, productivity, skills, NOT given by gender. There's enough cases of strong women like Thatcher, who succeeded without such discriminatory practices. Didn't they already have that?
/r/MensRights04/08/11 01:26 AM
1

You think BMI is a good indicator of "health"? That's one useful indicator to determine your health.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 12:06 AM
4

Of course, but what has occurred up to date is e.g. a wealthy man marries woman, then a couple of years later divorce occurs and she claims half his wealth even if he earned that Before the marriage to which she did not contribute anything.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 11:38 PM
6

Next thing they must do is ensure that in any marriage, the acquired wealth prior to marriage remains property of the original owner, and only acquired wealth during marriage together is divided in case of divorce.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 09:53 PM
1

This is much better than leeching off the ex-spouse, or tax payers to finance the costs of raising other people's children.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 09:50 PM
1

Calculate Your Body Mass Index
/r/MensRights03/08/11 09:48 PM
1

Again, how can you tell someone is thin because of healthy lifestyle versus smoking and bulimia? We're talking about women who earn their living looking beautiful and smoke -- top models. Can you tell which ones are that way because of yoga and organic foods? I'm talking about healthy weight to height ratio vs people who are clearly overweight. Some people are thin, because of unhealthy lifestyle, but that is not the norm.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 09:04 PM
1

even with all the bulimia, anorexia and smoking? That's negative stereotyping, but you get the point that someone who looks naturally pretty is a sign of health vs overweight, back pain etc.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 06:54 PM
1

Being hot is a sign of health though.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 03:14 PM
1

The Pill for men will be out soon in Indonesia. High unemployment means there's no lack of working class people yet. America could need more immigrants who come mostly from central and south America, if it doesn't have replacement level birthrates in the long term.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 05:22 AM
2

It's part of the Ladder Theory... men and women have a different priority list for what they find important in a partner. For a woman a man's looks are a bit lower on her priority list, because she cares more about his success, status (money, power, fame), and how well he can provide/support her and a future family. A man finds a woman's looks, attractiveness, fertility, personality far more important, than her status or material possessions.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 05:16 AM
1

This has nothing to do with misogyny. It's about a situation where a murderer appears to get away with a heinous crime.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 02:43 PM
6

It was taking care of the household, children, while the husband was out working to provide for the family, and pay the bills.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 06:07 PM
-1

That's because most men don't bother to write a book! Guys if you have the skills to write books about MR go do it!
/r/MensRights31/07/11 05:36 PM
4

Thanks for sharing. Can you please post this at IAmA to raise awareness about the harm of Paternity Fraud?
/r/MensRights31/07/11 01:49 PM
3

10 Reasons You Should Rethink Infant Circumcision It's NOT your penis. No, seriously.. its not yours. Just being his parent doesn't give you the right to choose which healthy functioning body parts he gets to keep. Children aren't property! A circumcised penis in NOT easier to keep clean. After a circumcision, the newly cut penis will be sitting in feces and urine. Is that cleaner? An intact newborn penis is protected from all of that by the foreskin. You wipe it clean like a finger (DO NOT RETR…
/r/MensRights31/07/11 01:09 PM
1

How about female supremacists, or radical feminists.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 04:58 AM
7

Good job mate. Shows the double standards: as if men can't get drunk and be used for ulterior motives by women.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 07:57 PM
2

Yeah, I think it would be more useful if the news article shows a double standard like if she got a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 12:58 PM
2

Alright, fair enough.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 11:03 PM
2

It's somewhat related, because it's an example of how women also commit violent acts, and aren't all delicate flowers.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 09:56 PM
4

The outdated United Nations policies, treaties must change to include men and boys as sexual abuse (rape) victims so they can finally get help if necessary.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 06:28 PM
3

brunt2 used some crude language, but that doesn't make his point invalid. Feminism doesn't stand for true equality, because they've continuously opposed men's issues, such as Shared Parenting.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 05:13 PM
11

If that happens they should file a formal complaint or sue them.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 07:44 PM
11

It shouldn't be necessary to state "dads welcome", because fathers should always be welcome in any Family Lounge!
/r/MensRights27/07/11 07:17 PM
1

Hear, hear!
/r/MensRights27/07/11 05:09 PM
1

I recon you watch The Flipside of Feminism - C-SPAN Video Library, they explain it in more detail and answer questions.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 02:24 PM
1

Great presentation, but the draft should be apply to both men and women, it should be gender neutral. Also, they didn't mention how marriage has become too risky, and dangerous for men due to the secretive family courts, no shared parenting policy, and lack of safety measure against false abuse allegations.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 01:27 AM
1

This statement has no value. It is a wish for the future with no plan on how to get from A to B. I don't have to think of detailed plans for you here to convince you. Oh yeah millions of Americans job-less, living on food-stamps. US government should review its policy on that. US is not the most "free" nation in the world. There is no way to reverse that without removing women's suffrage. I realize the big changes that have occurred, and there's underlying reasons why women have in fact been sho…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 09:11 PM
1

This statement has no value. It is a wish for the future with no plan on how to get from A to B. I don't have to think of detailed plans for you here to convince you. Oh yeah millions of Americans job-less, living on food-stamps. US government should review its policy, because legalized prostitution adds big tax revenue. US is not the most "free" nation in the world. There is no way to reverse that without removing women's suffrage. I realize the big changes that have occurred, and there's under…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 09:10 PM
1

This statement has no value. It is a wish for the future with no plan on how to get from A to B. I don't have to think of detailed plans for you here to convince you. Oh yeah millions of Americans job-less, living on food-stamps. US government should review its policy on that. US is not the most "free" nation in the world. There is no way to reverse that without removing women's suffrage. I realize the big changes that have occurred, and there's underlying reasons why women have in fact been sho…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 09:09 PM
0

How? Unless you plan on getting prostitution legalized (fat chance) or sex robots are finally invented, you're talking fantasy. Oh, should we just have 90% of men deny their biological urges? Again, fantasy. Prostitution has always been part of society, it's one of the oldest professions in human history. Eventually sex workers will have equal rights and support again. The gradual slut-fication of youth makes sex cheaper. Yes sex-robots will be available eventually. And only in recent years have…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 08:38 PM
1

Yes, men usually collaborate with each other for a specific purpose, but it can also be friendship. I agree that men are more inclined to be competitive, but, whenever many suffer and the core of a problem is assessed, and understood there are solutions. Such as ending the sexual slavery of men. It can be ended in many ways, when the monopoly of women ends on the sexual need of men, many solutions will emerge. Women also compete with each other to certain degrees, it's just that their needs and …
/r/MensRights26/07/11 07:50 PM
1

Leave a response there, or feedback if you can.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 05:24 PM
1

Yes on Youtube, and on iTunes as a Podcast is very important. Downloadable mp3 formats are also useful.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 01:31 AM
1

He should use iTunes to host podcasts.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 12:57 AM
1

I recon you do a Paternity Test, unless you want to risk raising some other guy's kid.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 11:02 PM
1

First did you do a Paternity Test? If not you should find out the facts. Get a Paternity Test kit. Here's info about: The Gregory Mantell Show -- Parental Alienation Syndrome.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 10:50 PM
1

Did you do a Paternity Test for proof of whether any of the children are biologically yours? If they are biologically yours then look into Parental Alienation Syndrome.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 10:35 PM
3

People shouldn't jump to conclusions, if they make wrong statements it makes them look bad too.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 12:30 PM
3

Problem is a woman can change her mind at any time though. And men can also be victims of rape.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 03:59 PM
2

Rebekah Brooks allowed the misogyny under her watch, so that feminists could fabricate reasons to condemn news media as hostile towards women. it's creating ammunition for feminists to complain and blame men. Rebekah Brooks knew what was going on, and how women were referred to in the news papers and outlets she was responsible for in Britain. Her insidious actions finally fell through though.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 03:46 PM
2

The point is Rebekah Brooks allowed the misogyny to occur in the tabloids she was responsible for in the UK. In order to fabricate misogyny in media.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 04:02 AM
1

Is the lying ex-wife behind bars for her harmful false abuse allegation or what?
/r/MensRights24/07/11 02:33 AM
1

This deserves much more attention.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 02:30 AM
1

Also check this related post.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 03:42 AM
8

Thanks yeah good stuff, he does ignore to mention how men also had it bad back in the day, as much risks and sacrifice was put on the shoulders of men to best protect/provide/lead/serve their families at whatever cost. For example what happened during the Titanic disaster (mostly men who sacrifced their lives to protect women who were given life-boats first while most men drowned or froze to death in the ice cold sea). Also Chivalry imposed various rules, codes of conduct upon men that they were…
/r/MensRights23/07/11 01:36 AM
15

Many kudos to this man who's brave enough to speak up about the sexist double standard of how people in western media react based on the gender of the genital mutilation victim.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 01:00 AM
28

You should blame hypocritical feminism, not women. The users in that subreddit can be both men and women.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 11:44 AM
3

Sharon Osbourne already announced that she's gonna "take a break" from The Talk.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 11:33 AM
3

There should be a reasonable maximum for child support no matter how wealthy you are. And also safety checks to ensure it's spent on the children.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 11:33 AM
3

Why should he pay spousal support if he already loses $100 million USD in divorce? Why would his ex-wife still need "spousal support" after such a lavish divorce settlement? Makes no sense at all.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 11:30 AM
3

They just make a fool of themselves, because it highlights the double standards that they only support "equality" for women, while deliberately ignoring men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 11:28 AM
2

What bothers me about Fathers 4 Justice is that their only method is Demonstrations. Why don't they do presentations, inform people, lobby, hire professional experts for Family Court Reform? They must diversify and professionalize their activism.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 11:27 AM
1

You can watch it here "The Talk", attempts to, Apologize about jokes of Catherine Kieu castrating husband.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 10:21 PM
2

There's another article on Morning Star. You shouldn't disregard daily mail so easily, they do have decent articles too.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 08:46 PM
0

You should record the sex event, leave your cellphone on.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:07 AM
4

Why is this necessary anyway?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:06 AM
1

That you won't impregnate your girlfriend while having sex without a condom. It doesn't protect against STDs though.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 10:55 AM
9

They mention methods to make men unnecessary for reproduction, but they fail to take into account that men are the back bone of civilization, inventors, creators, and engine of progress. Society would stagnate, collapse, and minimize chances of human survival otherwise. Furthermore to perfect human offspring by minimizing birth-defects, the only way to do that is to grow embryos externally, outside of the womb, so embryos can be monitored 24/7, and defects fixed when necessary.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:57 AM
1

It's about time geez.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 01:57 AM
1

What do you think about it?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 01:56 AM
12

Considering that feminists advocating the extermination of men (like Mary Daly) are hailed as heroes by most mainstream media, and show hosts can laugh about sexual assaults and genital mutilation of a man wondering whether "he deserved it" Yeah the double standard is feminists' tolerance of such horrible misandry, but utter intolerance if the roles were reversed. Because, if a man says such misogynistic things about women he'd get grilled, reputation destroyed etc.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 01:07 AM
1

It was about 20 hours ago so maybe it's a previous episode video. Not sure how to link to that.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 11:51 PM
0

I recommend Our Matriarchical Society by Guy White
/r/MensRights20/07/11 06:24 PM
0

These feminists claim to be for equality, and then oppose equal rights, and treatment of men? Now that's hypocritical.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 05:15 PM
3

Would be wise to keep a back-up of the document.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:29 PM
1

There's New Fathers 4 Justice, but it's not nearly as professional as Fathers & Families.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 11:38 PM
1

are increasingly presented as sex objects. You mean increasingly Use their sexuality to sell records.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 11:11 PM
3

Can we set up a petition to have her punished for the fullest extend of the law for her evil torture and genital mutilation?
/r/MensRights19/07/11 09:45 PM
1

Sharon Osbourne finds it okay to make fun of male genital mutilation victims, and shames anyone who disagrees with her. She's more diluted, and insensitive to other people's suffering than I thought.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 03:07 PM
3

That's a lot of financial compensation though, and I fear for the boy that his family won't leave much for him when he gets older. Also, with that money maybe they could get restoration surgery done, with some kind of donor or something.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 03:05 PM
1

Whoa is that Angry Harry, I haven't seen a video of him before. Yeah he can use a haircut and dress better.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 03:02 PM
20

Any moron who sympathizes with a psycho genital mutilator has a big mountain of bad karma coming towards them.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 03:00 PM
3

You tell them you'll inform all your friends, relatives, family about it to avoid that show and perhaps CBS entirely.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 02:58 PM
3

It would be useful to inform other mass media news outlets about the misandric episode of The Talk.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 02:55 PM
5

Penis shaft is comparable to entire vulva. They wouldn't find it funny one bit if it happened to them.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 09:23 AM
2

People should send this story to other media outlets.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 09:10 AM
1

It should be alright if written in a civilized manner to get points across.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 07:56 AM
2

Good idea mate.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 01:38 AM
1

Yeah, leave a comment on their Facebook page if you can.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 01:34 AM
3

People are free to say what they want, but they should be held accountable: so yes a monetary compensation, getting fired, and a sincere apology are reasonable.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 01:25 AM
10

People should use civilized comments, not childish remarks.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 01:20 AM
6

I recommend people to read the Men's Rights FAQ which has a wealth of information, and answers many questions.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 07:27 PM
2

More sexist privileges for one gender; women, while discriminating against men in the UK.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 10:23 AM
1

Maybe get in contact with Fathers & Families or National Coalition for Men if you live in America.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 10:17 AM
1

Maybe add that it's a parody of CBS's The Talk show.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 09:27 AM
2

She could still be replaced by a respectable host.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 01:56 AM
1

They probably wouldn't make fun of it. The equivalent of the penis shaft is vulva though.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 01:54 AM
4

Every little bit helps. We should have faith that things can improve.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 01:52 AM
4

Watch this clip Catherine Kieu Castrates Husband, and check where it starts.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 05:29 PM
4

The exorbitant celebration, laughing at a victim of domestic violence who was horribly mutilated for life, is not something to laugh about at all. This incident on CBS "The Talk" is not excusable. Any male or female TV Host should be fired for such acts.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 01:54 PM
6

Many women of any country are expendable too, it doesn't require many women to ensure sufficient offspring. And, given the low birthrates in many developed countries, many new citizens are immigrants anyway. It's what a person does, achieves in his/her life which shows the true value of that person.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 01:51 PM
3

Yes please send complaints to CBS about this disgustingly misandric show called "The Talk".
/r/MensRights17/07/11 01:50 PM
1

I disagree with you. It's not an elaborate debate, but she made statements, he debunked them.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 02:47 AM
1

It's important to give men who were "tricked" into fatherhood an option to relinquish parental rights and obligations aka Choice for Men. Especially with paternity fraud where a man is tricked into raising a child, while it's actually not his.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 12:31 AM
0

If they can't take care of the child, either have a close friend take care of it, or put it up for adoption.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 11:51 PM
2

You can use this article for such discussions: The Female Privilege Checklist You can avoid rants after such points are made.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 11:45 PM
3

Thanks, we should have a campaign.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 11:21 PM
6

She's still branded a sex offender. Not nearly as harsh of a punishment she would've gotten if she were a he though.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 11:20 PM
1

Okay she got busted over her statements. Rudov could've given her time to explain the statements, but it would be pointless, because the wage gap is a debunked myth.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 10:42 PM
2

We should file complaints about this and get the hosts of "the view" fired.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 08:07 PM
1

She said e.g. "we live and die in a patriarchal culture", and used the wage gap myth as an argument.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 07:29 PM
5

Right, that's a big problem, men and women should be sentenced just as harshly for their crimes.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 06:15 PM
33

A man would go to jail for years and be branded a child abuser, but this woman gets a slap on the wrist!
/r/MensRights16/07/11 06:03 PM
1

Warren Farrell is a Former Feminist, because of the hypocrisy of feminism. Warren Farrell, former feminist, says men are oppressed August 12, 1993|By Pamela Warrick | Pamela Warrick,Los Angeles Times Gloria Steinem hasn't spoken to him in years. Alan Alda doesn't invite him for tennis anymore. And then there's the matter of those millions in lost income. But, please, don't feel sorry for Warren Farrell. At 50, America's most outspoken former feminist is "right where I want to be." So what if tha…
/r/MensRights16/07/11 01:34 PM
9

Science is not "friendly" for either boys or girls. It is what it is. By dumbing down science you harm the prospects of the entire country to compete with other countries such as in Asia which keep it normal. How about make feminized education more accommodating for boys, with more hands-on learning and no drugging of boys who need more physical movement, and competition is encouraged.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 06:36 PM
10

Women who call themselves "feminists" and support men's rights exist, but are quite rare. I think because feminism in general frowns upon it, and in feminist ideology men are demonized as evil oppressors and inferior.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 06:29 PM
2

Also see Modern feminism: an evaluation. Does the ‘4 waves’ notion help us to understand feminism? Not really. The fact that chronologically the third wave comes after post-feminism says a lot about the validity of the waves hypothesis. The most important distinction of feminism – the fight for equality Vs the fight for supremacy – has a clear boundary in the 1960s, and from the 1960s onwards the 'second wave' has been the only aspect of feminism that has had any power or influence in the world.…
/r/MensRights15/07/11 04:01 PM
1

We can discuss this forever, the point is: First Wave Feminists would be shocked about modern feminism which has become radicalized. The majority of feminists actively or passively condone the misandric statements and radical anti-male agendas of their leaders. This says something about the sore state feminism is in. Passive complaceny or not speaking out against their feminist leaders for their radical, anti-male agendas has been a problem of feminism for decades and it has given them a bad nam…
/r/MensRights14/07/11 07:58 PM
1

Neo-Nazis receive fierce opposition whenever they march somewhere, but the mass media tens to condone misandric statements by feminists yet misogyny not so much. Feminists who supposedly "actively" ignore their radical leaders's statements is strange, no good at all. There's barely any feminist, and no feminist leaders whatsoever who condemn misandric statements by e.g. Christine Lagarde sexist remark: says men (testosterone) caused the recent financial collapse. Yet if Geithner or Bernanke said…
/r/MensRights14/07/11 07:27 PM
1

Thing is if there was a similar conference where men would honor such a book which is extremely hateful and sexist (SCUMM Manifesto is just a terrible as Mein Kampf), there would be lots of uproar also in main-stream media. Sure there's some who denounce it, but not many. And it's odd that so many feminists have been supporting the likes of Harriet Harman among other (radical) feminist leaders. It's very strange that Harriet has been bestowed with trust at all.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 07:16 PM
1

Still they don't publicly denounce it. Can you show me a couple of articles written by feminists whodenounce this honoring of the SCUM manifesto in Australia? It's silent in-deference and condoning of their radical leader's anti-male agendas and actions that is a serious problem.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 06:37 PM
1

Really? I just read back through the thread and I don't see you anywhere denouncing cliffoy's "feminazi cunts" remark. I downvoted it and said people should discuss in civilized manner. Are you seriously going to try to argue that there wasn't a vast stretch of time where men had dominion and a great deal of control over women? Just the fact that women weren't even allowed to vote until 1920 proves my point. Voting in general is a recent novelty. Men couldn't vote in the UK either see for exampl…
/r/MensRights14/07/11 06:25 PM
1

FTFY. You don't get to call one side out for not actively opposing their crazies if you aren't doing it yourself. I am doing it myself though. I never said that women were completely enslaved, I said that was the far end of the spectrum in which any imbalances to the right or left are "too far to the [right or] left". Again I disagree here, for both ordinary men and women life was tough. There is a huge difference between doing something in your own self interest that causes a problem for someon…
/r/MensRights14/07/11 05:58 PM
1

I agree that people should try to stay civilized with discussions. I disagree with the conclusions that feminism is the problem and that the average feminist is anti-men. Barring the Valerie Solanas types, feminists are generally no more anti-men than Democrats are anti-Republican. They're not trying to enact their ideas to cause harm to the other side, they're trying to enact their ideas because they think they're the best course of action. The silent agreement with feminists like Harriet Harma…
/r/MensRights14/07/11 05:27 PM
19

Just report her on facebook for posting a near nude image of you without your consent, and have it removed.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 03:39 AM
1

Yeah we should be vigilant against unfounded misogyny and misandry. I think a small government and low taxes, more freedom is possible. Men and women are equal but different, we should celebrate differences.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 01:28 AM
2

The original feminists (first wave) had legitimate claims, not so much second-third waves and the radicalization of feminism of which the original feminists would oppose. We're all for true equality, sadly the feminist track record has shown time and time again that they deliberately turn a blind eye whenever males suffer. Yet, when the same thing happens to females they suddenly show support. Feminists go to great lengths to prevent e.g. fathers from gaining equal rights as parents (obstruct Sh…
/r/MensRights14/07/11 01:09 AM
1

There's a difference between not liking a message, and obsessively downvoting everything in a sub-reddit.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 01:01 AM
1

How do I know it's them, and if so how can I ban such people?
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:12 PM
1

It's already interesting enough. If you don't like anything about MZ then please just ignore all of this.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 04:17 PM
2

I'm not asking for upvotes, I'm asking for sensible people who Like it, to show some support.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 04:13 PM
5

Thanks mate.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 04:03 PM
3

You can help by turning around the tide, u don't necesssarily need to be a moderator, while I could use one. How about your Subscribe to MZ?
/r/MensRights13/07/11 04:01 PM
3

You don't have many comments or submissions on reddit. How about you subscribe and support MZ first, and we'll see how that goes.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 03:59 PM
2

Feminists, Female Supremacists I suppose who are against true equality.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 03:56 PM
2

Yeah, I suspect that too. Could you show some support?
/r/MensRights13/07/11 03:55 PM
4

Finding something dis-interesting is no reason to down-vote everything. I suspect the person in question is against equality, and what MenZone stands for.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 03:54 PM
3

Now everything is down-voted. I don't get it.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 03:46 PM
2

Oh sorry, didn't know before, I've deleted that.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 03:46 PM
9

You should point out the double standards of how shocked people would if this happened to a woman, and how it's just as horrific when this occurs to a man or any person. That crazy woman should be locked up in a mental institution for the rest of her life. There's no telling who's genitalia she'll cut off next.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 07:18 PM
3

This is worth reading: SAVE Creates Model Legislation to Replace VAWA
/r/MensRights12/07/11 06:57 PM
1

You can read more here.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 06:56 PM
3

Sexist double standards, screw those ten congressmen.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 11:49 AM
2

Well "mens" is incorrect spelling. It's men's cars, men's bikes, men's speedboat, not mens newspaper etc.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 09:53 AM
2

Now it's men's turn. FTFY
/r/MensRights12/07/11 09:17 AM
1

Lol, if you have spare time, can you talk some sense into those people in that post?
/r/MensRights12/07/11 12:45 AM
1

Yeah this is pretty important.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 03:50 AM
2

These peudo-males can't climax anymore with sex or what?
/r/MensRights11/07/11 02:49 AM
0

Get in touch with the NCFM, or F&F maybe they can help you.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 02:34 AM
3

Alright, still if that guy behind the video gets hurt by the biased laws he'll talk differently.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 10:26 PM
2

How do you know?
/r/MensRights10/07/11 10:18 PM
3

He'll talk differently when he or any of his friends/relatives receives a false abuse allegation or when his wife divorces him and takes him to the cleaners.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 10:00 PM
1

Okay I checked, but honestly people shouldn't take such "funny" threats to their lives lightly. This "take it like a man" stance is a big problem. If the OOP still considers it all a joke then he's a fool.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 09:31 PM
1

The title of the original post is "funny? more like wtf." = the OP doesn't really find it funny.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 09:23 PM
5

Yes, it's important to point out errors, inconsistencies, half-truths on GMP. However, I'm not sure if the moderators there allow much freedom of expression though. It would be way more effective for a high quality Men's Entertainment & Men's Rights hybrid website to compete with GMP (this could also work in magazine, video or podcast format). Because, today's youth interest cannot be maintained with only serious content. They will get bored. That's why such a hyrbid MR site is the solution for …
/r/MensRights10/07/11 09:11 PM
2

I agree with your explanation of how feminist fabricate, misinterpret "privileges" as fuel for the fire. As for the article, I think the list is debunked nicely.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 07:11 PM
4

Not really, a lot of them have been burned by the system, biased policies though, and are upset about it which shows.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 07:08 PM
1

@sdubois, read the Female Privilege Checklist which debunks much of the supposed "male privileges".
/r/MensRights10/07/11 06:40 PM
1

A lot of needs/preferences in a person's life are biologically influenced.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 06:35 PM
3

At least she wont be able to turn around and inevitably sue him for child support. There's some cases where this did occur. So my advice is don't be a sperm donor, because there's no telling if they change their mind and come after you. The child should have the right to find out who the biological father is at an older age though.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 06:25 PM
1

Well, you shouldn't use such a weird tactic, it's confusing for others. Most people won't bother to check your post history.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 06:21 PM
3

Why did you post this nonsense? How can you call yourself "ForMensRights"? Nobody is supposed to support men's rights. That would be supporting male privilege. Men face nothing today that puts them at a disadvantage ever. Men even get custody of children over 80 percent of the time and commit suicide over 4 times less than women, for instance.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 06:05 PM
1

Oh that sucks man. I didn't know that. It would be nice if you fellas show some support there though. I've created a subreddit called MenZone where people can discuss men's interests and Men's Rights issues freely.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 05:55 PM
4

His wife threatening to stab him is a death threat. He should talk with her about it, if she confirms that statement, record the conversation, and divorce her before it's too late. Such death threats shouldn't be considered a joke.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 10:10 AM
1

I downvoted your last comment, because you were dragging this discussion on without adding anything. Anyway, I'm done with this discussion.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 02:04 AM
4

It's not a fair game when laws or policies aren't gender neutral, such as: VAWA which excludes male victims of domestic violence false abuse allegations which don't require evidence thus men are considered guilty until proven innocent millions of dollars/euros/pounds funding for women's organizations yet almost nothing for men's organizations the institutionalization of women's issues, but not men's issues systematic discrimination against men with affirmative action frequent softer punishment o…
/r/MensRights09/07/11 11:06 PM
1

Who would be so desperate to marry that fugly gold digger?
/r/MensRights09/07/11 09:43 PM
2

Many of these are prominent feminists, some leaders haven't been widely denounced for their misandric statements: Linda Gordon, Robin Morgan, Valerie Solanas, Authoress of the SCUM Manifesto, Sheila Cronin, the leader of the feminist organization NOW, Andrea Dworkin, Ti-Grace Atkinson, Catherine MacKinnon (Prominent legal feminist scholar; University of Michigan, & Yale.), Harriet Harman, Jodie Foster; Actress - as quoted in The New York Times Magazine., Susan Griffin, Rape: The All-American Cri…
/r/MensRights09/07/11 09:33 PM
3

If you do more research you'll find feminism utilizes half-truths, or debunked lies to further their radical agenda. For example Men's Health Australia Busts Office for Women's 'False and Misleading' DV Statistics, and Hoax: The Continuing Distortions about Intimate Partner Abuse | Christina Hoff Sommers | Return of the Super Bowl Hoax. Feminists tend to ignore women's bad behavior, and faults while claiming to look out for them does women a disservice. How can feminists claim to speak on behalf…
/r/MensRights09/07/11 09:08 PM
4

If you look carefully you'll find feminists don't speak for the best interests of women in general, but are a minority group who are out of touch with reality. For example feminsts contempt for housewives. Opposing feminism, doesn't equate being against women. I'm against feminism, but respect women (respect is a two way street), support women's rights, and true equality without sexist double standards.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 08:39 PM
5

Why do you think that? This isn't about hatred against women, it's about: how Feminism has had a detrimental effect on interactions, relationship between men and women. That women are not solely innocent flowers (which during the time of chivalry was assumed), but can do wrong too, just like men. Wisen up by acknowledging and avoiding risks, methods to control or use men. That decades of rampant feminism indirectly molds a new generation of men who don't fall for half-truths and lies, shaming la…
/r/MensRights09/07/11 07:12 PM
1

There's absolutely men's interests. Stuff which men find fascinating, interesting. Up to you, but generally speaking men find some of that interesting.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 05:38 PM
11

So the Australian Chief Justice applies sexist double standards; who would've thunk it?
/r/MensRights09/07/11 05:30 PM
1

Okay, that were just some examples.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 04:52 PM
1

Can you also up-vote the other discussion please?
/r/MensRights09/07/11 01:18 PM
1

It's not redundant at all, it's urgently needed. Have magazines add a special section about men's rights and issues could be a solution. Very few men's focused outlets cover both worlds though, it's rare. That is the whole problem. Yes people can subscribe to different subreddits here, but there's almost no subreddit, and barely any men's oriented magazine, TV channel, radio show, website which actively covers both worlds.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 01:16 PM
2

That's like saying we don't need men's magazines, because all individual magazines cover the interests of men already. I disagree. There's a sore lack of quality magazines/channels/websites which cover both Men's Interests (entertainment) and Men's Rights. In other media formats when you go to a store or TV channels, you'll will barely find anything about Men's Rights, and entertainment rolled into one. Yes on Reddit there are specific MR, advice, and entertainment oriented subreddits, but very …
/r/MensRights09/07/11 12:17 PM
1

Well it's about a special reddit which covers the wide scope of men's interests, from entertainment to serious issues. OneY covers Men's Rights issues, but lacks men's entertainment interests. MenZone is intended to bring together both.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 12:05 PM
2

what do you mean? This specifically caters to men's interests, and includes Men's Rights coverage too which is still often neglected.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 11:30 AM
1

It's always a weighing off of options. It can never be fully balanced, and given wives' detest for their husbands to do half or more of the child-rearing, as they rather have him working at a job to bring in money she can spend (women do majority of shopping, because they receive the extra spending power from men, and shopping is one of the most favorite past-times of women). To improve the situation Shared Parenting Policy, and the end to anti-father bias in family courts is essential.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 09:39 AM
1

I never said nothing can change. However, I told you already that your suggested massive change is unlikely (that househusbands become a majority, and women work more full-time; particularly hazardous, heavy, dirty jobs), because it's unrealistic, and not in line with innate preferences men and women have always had for prospective spouses and work (Ladder Theory). BTW men being active in raising children, is nothing new. It's very old, but generally speaking men didn't have as much time and opp…
/r/MensRights09/07/11 01:57 AM
1

I'll bet when men lost their bonds, connection with family, and boys lost their fathers to the sole provider that is when men became so weak. Female domination over vulnerable men is why we are fucked. It was only until recent decades, that the rise of dysfunctional youth, from millions of broken, fatherless families in America, and other western countries, because of the anti-father bias in secretive divorce courts (massive wealth transfers, social engineering). Otherwise, good fathers would st…
/r/MensRights09/07/11 01:53 AM
1

Before no-fault divorce, and false abuse allegations, the marriage deal was decent for men and women. Divorce didn't offer lavish financial rewards for the person who filed divorce. Marriage/divorce wasn't a big industry for profits yet. Yes, men lost partial connection with their children ever since men started to work en-mass away from home. Now when many women entered the work force they screwed over themselves, because it reduced wages (2 employees for the cost of 1), and mortgages went up. …
/r/MensRights08/07/11 11:54 PM
1

Women will go for men who do not provide for them. I already said you shouldn't use the word "providing", because that it's not the only factor of attraction, read some of my other posts in this thread. Most women who divorce think they can and do find more romantic relationships. (Ergo women who have made money are on the market). People divorce for all sorts of reasons. Yes, women who've divorced can try to find another sucker to marry, but if he's smart enough he wouldn't fall for it. And, th…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 11:39 PM
1

Feminists use shaming language to silence opposition when they run out of arguments. You should read ‘The Catalogue of Anti-Male Shaming Tactics’
/r/MensRights08/07/11 09:07 PM
0

Please up-vote the other related discussions if you like it.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 08:56 PM
1

You can't take solely the Aboriginal example and apply that to the entire world. The word isn't "provider", it's Proven Men, of higher stature which women prefer. Of course women initiate most divorces, when they get huge financial benefits, and occasionally life-time alimony payments. There's no discouragement anymore to minimize divorce. On the other hand, men can barely completely divorce his ex-wife due to ongoing financial obligations forced upon them by unaccountable, unreasonable family c…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 06:55 PM
1

Men's Rights FAQ Additions: 0D: Modern feminism: an evaluation 0E: How feminists tried to destroy the family 0F: Feminist Quotes 0G: The Ten Most Common Feminist Myths 0H: Women need to speak out on feminism and the hateful ideology it represents 0I: The Definition of Anti-Feminism 0J: The feminist trojan horse in Family Law, Australia, George Christensen 0K: The Origins of Political Correctness/Feminism 0L: Myths and Facts Concerning Divorced Families and other Feminist Myths 0M: Professing Fem…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 06:43 PM
0

Hey I agree with you danipilon. Earlier, I saw a clip of her, and thought she had at least a couple of decent points.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 06:20 PM
1

Also see RADAR Media Fact Sheet on domestic violence.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 05:29 PM
0

Crap, I initially thought she was one of the more sane politicians. That sucks. People should support Ron Paul!
/r/MensRights08/07/11 05:19 PM
1

Absolutely, thanks to the countless inventions by men, modern housework is not nearly as time-consuming or hard work as it used to be. It used to be a full-time job back in the day. Yes, many fathers want to spend more time with their kids, but are often unable to have flexible work-times, or risk lowering promotion prospects, and are pressured to work full-time to cover the bills (when wife works part-time or doesn't have a job) or by their boss etc.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 05:14 PM
1

Yeah you write a wall of text so I have to pick stuff to go into detail about and respond it. The point is that such patterns and preferences are partially genetically, evolutionary determined. For example a man seeks a young healthy, fertile woman instead of a rich, old woman. Because the young woman has the best prospects to bear offspring and take care of them, lower expectations, easier to please and such. Meanwhile women seek, safety, stability as preconditions for starting a family thus th…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 05:02 PM
1

Sure women should also provide for families if possible. I never said they couldn't. Taking care of the household and raising children is a form of providing too. Yes, men used to work near their homes before the industrial revolution. So they had much more time to spend with their children, this has become much worse due to far commutes for jobs,and the anti-father family courts who often don't let good fathers spend regular time with their children.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 04:40 PM
1

Yes relationships are always a two-way street. So when women start making more they will continue to be interested in men and by necessity the differential between what women and men make in sexual relationships will shrink. What happens is they get miserable, because they say "there are no good men left" because they consider the men of low social/economic stature to be unworthy of their time etc. There's plenty of articles about that. Additionally when women make more, men will expect more. Me…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 04:31 PM
1

Sure there's men who prefer to do other things too. I'm just saying many men enjoy to e.g. provide financial security for their families.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 03:33 PM
8

You should check the Female Privilege Checklist.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 03:00 PM
1

Men do not expect women to make more, because they know in the backs of their minds, see the Ladder Theory, that women don't seek men of lower social/economic status. And, women become more upset/unsatisfied if their husband is of much lower social/economic status = relationship likely to fail in the long run. Men biologically prefer women who are young and fertile, because that gives higher chances of healthier offspring. Meanwhile, women prefer men of higher social/economic stature than them (…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 09:08 AM
1

Men would marry up en-mass if there were many women willing to be in such a marriage (men from humble stature who marry wealthy women). However, due to preferences, of which some is biological, this rarely occurs. In the back of their minds men know such a relationship would not work out, because the wife/girlfriend would get upset with them in the long run, consider them "unworthy" due to their (substantially) lower stature. Furthermore, men find enjoyment in providing for their families/loved …
/r/MensRights08/07/11 01:52 AM
1

Yes men want more time with the family, but men are rarely given the option to be full-time house husbands. Most wives don't want to work full-time while the husband takes care of the household. Women have more life style choices, because their boyfriend/husband offer to work full-time so they can choose to work-part time, be full time housewives etc. The anti-father family courts in western countries such as in the UK don't help much either. British Family Justice Review: No Equality For Dads. …
/r/MensRights08/07/11 01:32 AM
1

Haha in no way is he dumb, he's extremely intelligent and i find that really attractive, I'm not going to go marry him and take half his money or some shit if thats what you are implying by risks, only a rare few people are that eeeeeevillll. Sorry, this has occurred en-mass ever since no-fault divorce. Rich men have payed up to their noses and occasionally even gave more to their ex-wives (who want to maintain the same life style) while she contributed little during the entire marriage. Divorce…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 01:24 AM
1

Men are far more likely to marry down, because woman's wealth, power, fame is not as important for men vs vice versa. If their wife/gf earns much more, she will usually become unhappy with him (see him as not good enough), and the relationship has a higher chance of failing. This is why there's far more often men with younger, and low income girlfriends.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 01:22 AM
1

Yes, there's many factors that determine attraction, it's just that for women in general, a man's wealth, power and/or status are top defining factors for attraction. A man's personality, looks comes maybe at 4th, 5th place compared to that.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 01:17 AM
1

You're either one of those rare good western girls (keeper) or your rich boyfriend is dumb if he doesn't know the risks involved. Personally, I could think of a long list of stuff to keep me occupied other than a corporate job.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 12:43 AM
2

That's the whole problem of how these "career women" shoot themselves in the foot. When they reach the top they say "there's no good men left" in other words a lack of available men with higher social, economic status. Also, they'll find the feminist saying "you can have it all" is a myth. The feminization of education, under-performing boys, increased drop-outs of male students only worsens this prospect.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 12:40 AM
3

If you get rich, she may claim at least 50% so she never has to work again since she dislikes jobs already. You should at least have a co-habitation contract.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 12:37 AM
1

Women tend to marry up though (seek men of higher social economic status).
/r/MensRights07/07/11 11:25 PM
8

"Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." -Hillary Clinton The sexist and hypocritical part of this quote is that it's Men who risk and lose their lives in combat, to protect these women. The women who mourn are not the primary victims otherwise they would've been dead too. It's like saying the soldier who died is not the primary victim, but the family who lost the soldier is. It makes no sense at all.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 10:22 PM
2

It just bugs me that people don't "give a fuck" about men who die, but if it's a woman, then lets all cry and be angry. That's the stance of certain media outlets, and people should complain about such biased reporting of victims.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 10:19 PM
2

If Strauss is officiallly declared innocent, and the false accuser punished, this can actually deter False Rape Allegations! The feminists again twist situations to portray women as sole victims regardless of they make false abuse allegations. Tell Reuters to interview Men's Rights Advocates for a change!
/r/MensRights07/07/11 10:13 PM
1

Here's a blank White Knight version, suitable for memes.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 10:08 PM
2

Yeah, and political correctness = political censorship, "leaders" dictating people what's appropriate.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 10:05 PM
1

Interesting site mate.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 09:52 PM
1

I added the words, because otherwise the meme name is unclear for people who see it for the first time.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 09:50 PM
9

I suspect they'd allow the grizzly to roam regardless of the gender of the victim.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 09:22 PM
1

This is a project to make the original idea, vision a reality!
/r/MensRights07/07/11 09:18 PM
1

I think simply down-voting when much time was put into it without giving feedback is lame. This got great feedback in this post, on which this is based. So your down-vote is not in-line with what many others think. It's not being forced at all. And MR can use some humor to bring points across.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 09:10 PM
0

A chess piece would be worse, because it's dull. This is a continuation of an earlier post, and I used the same artwork proposed here.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 09:06 PM
1

Thanks, yeah that's some good ideas.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 09:03 PM
1

The image of these men appears to have been photo-shopped to feminize their lips by coloring them an unnatural, lipstick-esque, shade of red. I disagree with that part, there's plenty of men with naturally reddish, full lips.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 08:49 PM
0

If you vote down, please give feedback anyway so this can be improved.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 08:46 PM
0

Because the various findings point towards numerous major inconsistencies in her "story" (see articles).
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:25 PM
1

Please up-vote the "other discussions" if you like it!
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:35 PM
5

We should keep confidence this kind of stuff can be fixed given enough effort and momentum.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:08 PM
3

Then he shouldn't be considered guilty, if there's no hard evidence.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 03:49 PM
0

If Casey Anthony was a guy, she would've probably been locked up by now.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 03:48 PM
1

This is why you should 1. not marry 2. if you do get a prenuptial agreement. Also I read Arnold has to pay alimony to her, but the upcoming ex-wife doesn't have to pay a dime to him.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 03:26 PM
5

Did they do a DNA test? Mere words are not evidence.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 03:19 PM
3

P.S please vote up the other discussion thread if you like it.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:26 PM
2

She must still get prosecuted for her false rape allegations, so she cannot harm more innocent men's lives.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:02 PM
-1

This situation is related to The Ladder Theory of Attraction. P.S. many developed countries have poor birth-rates, which cannot sustain the population levels. thus millions of immigrants come in to fill up the low birthrates. Such countries cannot survive or sustain themselves otherwise. The immigrants raise more children due to subsidization by the working class. Then you gradually see the culture and values change as the population changes.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:01 PM
1

The point is to offer men also "choices" instead of only obligations as it stands now. Yes, well women already have all the options and contraception at their disposal to decide whether they'll get pregnant or not. Anyone, here can give suggestions on how to improve the list.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:39 PM
2

You should never fight over a woman, it's not worth it. Let her get with other men if she wants, but leave her if she does so.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 03:00 PM
1

This is ridiculous, and they don't bother to step up analysis to only take DV allegations with Proof seriously, not just words since many allegations turn out false. When are men in the UK gonna stop these nonsense policies.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 02:26 PM
2

I didn't know Ashton Kutcher was such a dumb tool.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 02:22 PM
2

If it's proven he's innocent, he should use all his power to bring the false rape accuser to justice and behind bars.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 02:19 PM
2

How can feminist honor a woman who supports gendercide, and wrote about inexplicable acts in her manifesto? It's like neo-nazis honoring Hitler for Mein Kampf! Such an inconsiderate, dumb act will tarnish feminism's reputation further.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 02:14 PM
2

False rape accusations should be punished just as harshly as real rape cases.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 12:20 AM
1

We only despise feminists, and the double standards, lies and half truths of their misandric ideology.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 12:16 AM
2

The United States has an illusion of offering people choice, while in reality the two parties democrats and republicans are two sides of the same coin on many issues. Votes matter, but more importantly is gaining the financial backing of the big corporations who spend millions of dollars lobbying. I think it's possible to establish a fair society without double standards, and where people of any gender, race or creed don't receive special treatment.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 12:15 AM
1

Serious stuff should be discussed in this subreddit for the most part.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 09:21 PM
7

Well Rights4Men should decide for themselves what kind of content they want. They aren't running a campaign against gays.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 09:13 PM
2

Yes she's an informant, but shouldn't get away with it so easily. The article says they won't send her to jail because: 1. she is female 2. "Since the accused is a female and she has already joined the investigation and her custodial interrogation is not required... it is hereby ordered that in the event of arrest, the accused be released on bail." Counsel Aggarwal also stated that the women in the country should be given a special status and the accused being an unmarried woman They should not …
/r/MensRights30/06/11 09:00 PM
4

Well it's estimated at least 1/8th of child sexual abuse is perpetrated by women (female pedophiles). See .e.g. in the UK child help line stats. It's still under-reported.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:32 PM
2

Christine Lagarde uses classic shaming language to portray men negatively, by bashing male biology, without providing any evidence for her fictitious claims. It shows how immature and unprofessional she is.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:17 PM
2

What's this got to do with Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights30/06/11 03:48 AM
0

Yeah that one is brilliant.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 03:32 AM
2

Also check the mediocre comments on that article. Christine Lagarde is 55 years old. I think she's a relic from the old radical feminist era. Note that nearly 10% of the French population is not ethnic French, and have higher birthrates. They will wield the scepter in the future, not misandric feminists like Lagarde.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 03:29 AM
2

This is just sick, all four of those delinquents should go to jail for at least 10 years imo.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 02:54 AM
2

Christine Lagarde is French though.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 02:37 AM
6

Men shouldn't tolerate the misandry by sexist people like Christine Lagarde.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 02:36 AM
1

See the feminist plague is still running rampant. She won't win friends with such sexist comments.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 02:32 AM
1

If they want balance they must do at least half of all the dirty dangerous jobs which women shun like the plague.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 02:28 AM
2

Care to explain?
/r/MensRights30/06/11 02:17 AM
0

That was written by lawstudent.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 01:29 AM
1

Hmm, thanks for your contribution this is food for thought. :)
/r/MensRights29/06/11 07:53 PM
0

This is not about racial supremacism (I"m not even white). It's about the people who lived in a country for a long period of time usually uphold the culture/values of the country. With a massive influx of immigrants, and much higher-birthrates of the newcomers it brings lasting changes to a country's values and culture. This can be positive or negative. If people misinterpret it then that part should be fixed.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 07:23 PM
1

Alright, that sounds pretty good. Better ensure that it stays that way in Denmark! This doesn't dismiss the fact that there's serious men's issues in other countries like Sweden, Germany, Netherlands, Italy, France, Spain, Switzerland, Austria which have been seriously affected by feminism. I agree it's usually worse in the Anglosphere, and places like India though.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 07:20 PM
1

It's all related to the issue of Pro Choice for men.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 06:40 PM
3

Various studies have debunked the feminist myth, because overall men do at least as much work as women. New study blasts theory that women do more work By Isabel Coles LONDON | Thu Aug 5, 2010 11:18pm IST (Reuters Life!) - He may leave his socks lying around and avoid emptying the dishwasher, but a new study shows husbands do as much work as their wives. London School of Economics sociologist Catherine Hakim's research shows that when both paid work and unpaid duties such as housework, care and …
/r/MensRights29/06/11 06:38 PM
6

No, because you only say that in response, and it's much politer.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 05:59 PM
2

Yes for example: Claims of sex abuse by women grow By Hannah Richardson BBC News education reporter (9th November 2009) A huge rise in the number of children calling to report sexual abuse by women has been revealed by Childline. Over the past five years, the charity says the number of such calls has risen five times faster than youngsters reporting abuse by a man. Of 16,094 children who called Childline about sex abuse last year, 2,142 told of abuse by a woman, up 132% on 2004-5. Men still acco…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 04:54 PM
1

You know the situation better in Denmark than I, because I don't live there. However, I can easily prove you wrong with your false assumption that the problems only exist in English-speaking countries. Just read this Swedish website GenusNytt and all the news there. It sounds substantially better in Denmark by what you describe, and more fair in both ways (no gender gets much priviliged treatment or support over the other). As for prostitution, this is one of the oldest professions in human hist…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 04:37 PM
8

Never buy a girl a drink, unless you are already on a date with her. Whenever a girl turns you down, you say "it's your loss" that she missed a great opportunity.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 04:11 PM
1

Yeah the Huffington Post and Slate have many of these male-bashing, feminist articles.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 04:04 PM
3

Often female pedophiles are ignored, pretended like they don't exist, or get a slap on the wrist for sexual abuse though. The double standards: young boy is "lucky" when he gets sexually abused by a woman etc. While it can actually inflict tramatic, lasting psychological (sometimes physical) damage.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 03:36 PM
0

Feminism has corrupted many western countries such as Sweden, Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Holland, Italy, Canada, USA, Australia, New-Zealand, and non-western like India with issues such as (quick list): no shared parenting policy (ridiculous high child support/alimony payments), secretive corrupt family courts affirmative action (instead of equal opportunity for all) no minister for men (when there's a minister for women), quotas (gender communism). no similar support for male domestic violenc…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 03:23 PM
2

There's not many males or females who do that, but I think there's more female sex abusers than people assume. Because for example with a child help-line in the UK there's more reports of children who come forward and say they've been sexually abused by a woman.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 09:22 AM
1

Just make sure to always wash fruit and vegetables. If you live in America you should also worry about the unhealthy Fluoridated Tap Water (which indirectly goes into all sorts of food products and drinks).
/r/MensRights28/06/11 11:17 PM
5

Bless your mom for helping that innocent man.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 09:57 PM
2

That's horrible. I'm glad he was strong enough to get through it all, restored his innocence and name. Could they've checked the location of his cell-phone? Because a cell-phone signal can pinpoint where the owner is.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 09:54 PM
1

On a related note: pesticides on fruit and vegetables have shown to be harmful to men.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 08:53 PM
1

If you dig deeper, you'll find that evolution flows through men, because women are the "stabilizers". There are more genetic mutations among men. The successful men have healthy offspring which ensures certain mutations thrive. This is partially how evolution works.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 05:23 PM
1

There's plenty of women who could not procreate if they didn't meet certain qualifications. They actually had to put-in way more effort to get a decent husband and such. That said, men do have to "prove" themselves more. Women usually marry "up" (prefer a man of higher social economic status). This means women always seek superior men. Furthermore, there has been an abundance people back then (high birthrates per family) and even more-so now (overpopulation in many areas of the world, mostly dev…
/r/MensRights28/06/11 03:14 PM
1

Lol, did you respond to that article at Slate?
/r/MensRights28/06/11 03:08 PM
2

India is a victim of the feminist plague too.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 03:54 AM
1

The US already has one of the biggest prison populations in the world. This is not good at all.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 03:51 AM
2

Another male-bashing, female supremacist article from Slate.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 03:50 AM
1

It does say something, because generally speaking, children from single-parent households (usually single mothers) have proven to be more likely to have worse life prospects (under-perform, youth delinquency etc).
/r/MensRights28/06/11 03:36 AM
1

Okay it was an exaggeration. Still I think circumcision practiced by any religion without medical necessity is barbaric like the middle-ages.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 01:02 AM
3

Young babies cannot choose for themselves, the (usually unnecessary) circumcision is Forced upon them against their will, without consent. Yes, it's better when they're 18 to decide themselves if they want the procedure.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 04:33 PM
3

It's good that Islam is pro-fathers rights, but we shouldn't ignore its flaws such as unnecessary, forced circumcision of boys or any baby.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 03:06 PM
7

They still live in the middle-ages.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 05:55 AM
3

You just DO a paternity test after birth regardless, if they make it so complicated and hazardous. There's nothing to lose, because: if you don't do it you won't know for certain if the child is yours. if you do, you'll know the facts and can do some legal action if it gets ugly and use that as proof to not be held liable for someone else's baby. those corrupt laws to screw fathers need to be fixed.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 05:53 AM
1

Men deserve at least just as much "honoring" as women.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 05:46 AM
1

For example this one: Why boys will pick Bob over Barbie - children are genetically programmed, say scientists Boys are genetically programmed to prefer Bob the Builder to Barbie dolls, say scientists. Tests involving children as young as three months suggest biological differences and not social pressures dictate which toys children like to play with. The U.S. study looked at babies aged three to eight months - before they can identify even the gender of other people. Researchers placed a doll …
/r/MensRights27/06/11 05:05 AM
1

Yeah, well it's not just the "breadwinner", because it's becoming evident that specifically fathers, and husbands are treated unfairly. Check the many cases of where female criminals get a slap on the wrist, while they'd go to jail if they were a man for the exact same crime. There's many accounts of mothers who default on child support payments, but aren't called dead-beat. Yes if the marriage doesn't work, and there's no way to improve it, then separation may be the best solution. Good parents…
/r/MensRights27/06/11 04:59 AM
5

Condoms save you from 18 years of paying child support, STDs. You can get extra thin condoms if you want it to feel better. Be sure to buy reliable brands.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 04:15 PM
1

There's plenty of guys who take part in the Marriage Strike, but aren't MGTOW. Also, it helps inform, highlight this MR issue. If you check the MGTOW reddit, it has few members atm. Maybe it should be promoted better though.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 02:50 PM
19

You shouldn't blindly trust women who say they're on birth-control, because many of those "accidental pregnancies" turn out to be planned after all. If you want to be safe, always wear a rubber, and store condoms safely so they can't be tampered with.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 05:22 AM
0

Plenty of studies already show what usually occurs if you do as explained earlier.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 05:07 AM
2

Well, it may need to get real bad (massive reduction in marriage, and decades of low birth rates), before we see much change. The reputation of marriage and family courts will continue to deteriorate. Western Europe has poor birth-rates, and many immigrants from the middle-east and in the UK they have their own marriage/divorce laws due to their Islam religion. Not sure if the continuous Hispanic immigration to the US and Canada makes much difference.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 05:55 PM
1

I agree with most of your points. Marriage shouldn't necessarily be for life. A current problem is people are more inclined to divorce instead of putting effort into making it work, especially when divorce is encouraged, and has vast financial/legal rewards (mostly for wives).
/r/MensRights25/06/11 03:20 PM
2

It's about informing and realizing modern western marriage has far higher risks (mostly for men), than benefits. Until that is fixed, it's better to avoid it.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 03:15 PM
6

The last few decades, feminists have tried to destroy the family (see this article) and a method was to destroy the institution of marriage. Marriage itself is not what it used to be. It used to be for life, and divorce was discouraged (only a last resort at the most). Nowadays the majority of divorces are filed by wives (roughly 70% in America). Some wives even call their first husband a "starter husband" and marriage itself has been turned into a lucrative industry. Divorce is sometimes even e…
/r/MensRights25/06/11 12:33 AM
1

This was already posted a couple of times.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 12:28 AM
1

Well said mate.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 03:34 PM
1

You can raise a child in a "gender neutral" fashion, but it won't remove innate biological differences and preferences such as studies which show girls prefer dolls over trucks and vice versa for boys.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 03:30 PM
1

Well don't confuse Patriarchy with "Chivalry" because chivalry really isn't necessary.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 03:22 PM
3

It's on your private property I suppose, so there's no sane reason to.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 03:13 PM
2

Sounds really good!
/r/MensRights24/06/11 03:11 PM
3

Sorry mate, didn't know you were joking.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 01:56 AM
4

The author of the article kind of over-dramatizes it, but you should get the point. Oppression has some pretty obvious tell tale signs. Like torture and death; like bullwhips and chains; gas chambers and death camps. Oppression is a roadmap of scars on the back of a field hand that was purchased at an auction. It is the rope that gets strung over a tree branch in broad daylight and used to choke the life out of someone convicted of being the wrong color. It is an indelible stain on humanity, voi…
/r/MensRights24/06/11 01:27 AM
6

That's what happens when many women take on full-time jobs (mostly safe and clean ones though).
/r/MensRights23/06/11 09:03 PM
2

Next thing she demands buildings to go deep into the ground, because they look phallic in her feminist polluted mind.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 03:11 PM
2

Millions of Swedish krona tax payer money goes to feminists in Sweden, but almost nothing to Men's Rights Organizations in Sweden, yet she wastes time, and makes a fool of herself, by complaining about such childish things.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 03:10 PM
1

Sorry, didn't notice the old date, should it be removed?
/r/MensRights22/06/11 10:52 PM
1

This is another extreme Sexist Double Standard. Those feminist don't know what the word "equality means".
/r/MensRights22/06/11 07:38 PM
1

You don't need to wine and dine your date. You can meet up with her at a bar in the evening (after you already had dinner). Have a couple of drinks, chit chat. If she doesn't put out within 3 dates, you move on to the next (3 date rule).
/r/MensRights22/06/11 03:26 PM
2

Let's be honest, the amount of female privileges FAR outweigh male privileges in western countries.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 02:02 PM
1

Good work.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 01:31 PM
5

Very tragic, anti-father family courts are destroying families and the nation goes along with it.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 11:38 PM
5

Ask [Fathers & Families](www.fathersandfamilies.org) for help if you live in the US, and also the National Coalition for Men could be useful. Read the Top Ten Tricks of Scumbags Known as “Family Law Attorneys” and Divorce Self Defense 101
/r/MensRights21/06/11 05:01 PM
1

Those are exceptions. There are always exceptions to the rule. For example there are some very feminine males, and some very masculine females. Yet, those are a small percentage, not the norm. If you read the article, they explain that the color, shape, amount of movable parts etc. of toys are big factors.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 03:38 AM
3

Society can influence to some degree, but the example of innate Biological preferences, from a study of Texas A&M University, has many subjects who are of such a young age (human and monkeys) that they couldn't be aware of such influences: Boys are genetically programmed to prefer Bob the Builder to Barbie dolls, say scientists. Tests involving children as young as three months suggest biological differences and not social pressures dictate which toys children like to play with. The U.S. study l…
/r/MensRights21/06/11 03:28 AM
6

"There is quite a lot of research surrounding that fact, usually leading to the conclusion that men feel/felt threatened by that, and chose to overcompensate by degrading women (in most early societies). " This is inaccurate. Men naturally have a bigger surplus of productivity (less days off, work longer throughout their lives etc). Some need extra motivation to be productive such as by having a family, responsibility though. During the many centuries before electricity, democracy, comfortable t…
/r/MensRights21/06/11 02:30 AM
0

1: Yes absolutely. 2: True. 3: Yes. Nobody is created equal. There's differences among men, and among women as well. Men and women are equal, but different in certain ways. 4: Yes, it's not only about equal rights, but also equal responsbility, and no sexist double standards. 5: True, but there's are some innate biological differences between men and women, which make women more emotional (in general) and men logical. Both can be logical and illogic or emotional of course (the female and male br…
/r/MensRights21/06/11 02:09 AM
3

It takes time and awareness to build momentum. There's some leading organizations for Family Court reform, and Shared Parenting like Fathers & Families, but they are only active in America, not yet in the UK.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 12:03 PM
2

You should add the prime minister's name to the article title.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 08:35 PM
5

David Cameron doesn't mention the millions of good fathers in the UK who aren't allowed to see their children, but are forced to pay unreasonably high amounts of child support, and alimony.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 08:31 PM
4

This is not meant to be taken seriously. It's about the chivalrous expectation of the "white knight" that he expects to be rewarded for risking his life to save the "maiden" (who may not even be a true maiden). Aka chivalrous tool.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 08:25 PM
2

Nice, but his face is the same color as the wall.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 08:23 PM
8

Men shouldn't act as unpaid bodyguards, and women shouldn't expect them to. For men don't expect them to clean their room either.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 08:22 PM
-1

Yes, this could be a good cartoon to get points across in a humorous way.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 08:21 PM
4

David Cameron probably wouldn't dare criticize mothers on mother's day though.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 08:20 PM
1

It's long overdue, can't you read?
/r/MensRights19/06/11 05:42 PM
2

Big Banks and corporations who heavily influence governments, and undermine real voter representation, run-amok military industrial complex prohibits world peace too.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 05:40 PM
29

If Aerik gets a false abuse allegation, or taken to the cleaners with divorce, I doubt he'd still act like a white knight.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 06:24 AM
1

That can be feminists and anyone who's is in denial without backing up their arguments with facts or credible studies.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 04:50 AM
1

Sure you shouldn't waste time with feminist drones who don't bother to look beyond their religious-like ideology. I was more talking about regular people.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 04:33 AM
1

Best you can do is throw facts at them such as with that list. Then you've sown the seeds basically and the smarter people can pick up on it, view things differently than before. I agree it's no use to get into long bickering discussions, so such an other method can be effective.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 04:10 AM
1

Don't be pessimistic. Better do something than nothing. It's about planting the seed, opening people's eyes gradually.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 02:53 AM
6

She allowed herself to get pregnant in the first place. She has all the contraception and choice to not have sex with him, to not get pregnant. She shouldn't keep the child if she cannot take proper care of it, especially with an unwilling fuck-buddy who doesn't even want to be a father.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 02:52 AM
2

Post this list 12 indisputable indicators that Men are Second Class citizens in the USA. That should wake some of them up.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 02:38 AM
3

This is why it's important to break this taboo or whatever it is. If you're a man and you've been seriously abused, wronged, you should speak up about it, not "suck it up" and be quiet.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 10:50 PM
5

Men need to speak out and voice their pain, suffering, fears. This is very important. It's no good when something bad happens to suck it up, sit by yourself, pretend it didn't happen.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 05:48 PM
12

It's sad that male victims of senseless violence are ignored in the UK, and not given equal support as female victims already do.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 05:27 PM
1

You mean -feminist department for ensuring double standards. :P
/r/MensRights16/06/11 04:57 PM
1

Prostitution has always been a part of human society. Sex workers earn the same rights and protection as any other profession. Any abuse or misuse can be reduced when sex workers receive proper support. A big investigation has also shown that (look up the Guardian.co.uk article) that prostitution is mostly done voluntarily, by choice.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 03:18 PM
7

Let's wait and see if that domestic abuser woman gets a "slap on the wrist" or some excuse to evade justice.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 03:16 PM
6

There are multiple forms of male genital mutilation throughout history such as Eunuchs in Ancient China. Removal of a boy's foreskin is just as wrong as removal a girl's outer labia (forcefully decided by parents). When the latter is illegal, so should the former. Bottom-line is: What's good for the goose is good for the gander. No sexist double standards.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 05:48 PM
1

There's various sexist double standards that need to be rectified.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 04:52 PM
1

Russell Peters is a comedian, that can't be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 12:03 PM
1

You're underestimating India. Yes infrastructure is poor etc. but it will catch up in the long term. It's only a matter of time. India still has a massive low cost work force, while China's wages are rising much faster nowadays, combined with rapid graying of society due to one-child policy. India is also the counter-weight to hold China in check. Some points made by aj: India is the world’s largest democracy. India is one of the few countries in the World, which gained independence without viol…
/r/MensRights13/06/11 02:26 AM
1

Indians are more related to caucasians aside from skin color, than East-Asians. So I doubt the men have small genitalia. India is a rising power in the world (BRIC country: Brazil, Russia, India, China), and many areas in India are developing rapidly. Many low paying manufacturing jobs will probably move to India, when the wages rise too much in China.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 01:27 AM
4

Good point. You can have babies, but don't carry them yourself. An incubator could do so if it were available.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 02:43 PM
1

We must do whatever possible to stop and fix such malicious code by feminists in family law across western countries.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 12:32 PM
1

The world is overpopulated in many regions. Though many developed countries are graying. The idea of putting women on pedestals date back to the times of chivalry.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 12:11 AM
3

Notice how it's only guys depicted as creepy or potentially dangerous in those images. As if women never take advantage of guys during similar situations.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 10:10 PM
1

You can also lose your home in Canada if you do the same: "Shout at your spouse and lose your house" A frightening reality in Ontario -Father thrown in jail will lose job and family home for shouting at his wife.- By Mike March Monday, 6 May 2002 Last year, under pressure from women's shelters and radical feminist organizations, the Ontario Government passed its domestic violence Bill 117 in order to appease those ruthless and relentless government funded feminist organizations. Those in the leg…
/r/MensRights11/06/11 09:47 PM
2

Would be nice if Fathers & Families was also active in the UK. That could help a lot.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 09:47 PM
2

Yeah I would see it as a compliment. If they're hot, something could be arranged too.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 12:59 PM
2

Please comment about this article in the Gaming reddit too. I think he wrote it immaturely. He doesn't explain what women tend to enjoy more and excel at (female brain), and doesn't go into detail to explain stuff. There's some valid points though.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 09:22 PM
0

I think the original author wrote it in an immature way, but there's certain valid points in the article.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 09:19 PM
22

There's so many cases in America and the UK where female criminals get a slap on the wrist for the same crime at which a male would spend years in jail.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 01:42 PM
4

Yeah, and feminists pretend female sex abusers don't exist.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 01:39 PM
7

Sad Orwellian World in the UK.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 01:12 PM
3

Unfortunately, if you as the new boyfriend of a single mom spend a lot of time with a child that is not biologically yours, you can be perceived by courts as a father, because courts will say the child sees you as such. Thus potentially force you to pay child support. "child support" is being abused, because there are no set limits, family courts are notoriously slow to adjust it if the father struggles to get by, and there's no tracing of CS money to ensure it's spent on the children. I think t…
/r/MensRights06/06/11 02:42 PM
2

The purpose of a Paternity Test is to know the truth (facts) not mere words. Parents are entitled to know the truth.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 02:38 PM
4

Yeah men (and parents in general) should do a Paternity Test soon after birth to determine if it's genetically your child. Everybody ought to know the facts. After that you have a window for legal action in case the child isn't yours.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 01:08 PM
23

Yeah and a duped father must be able to relinquish all his paternal duties, when he finds out that it's not his child.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 01:47 AM
66

Paternity Fraud: Deliberately tricking a man into believing that certain children are his genetic offspring, to obtain his complete support at caring and raising them is an evil crime. Paternity Tests need to become mandatory soon after birth to prevent such horrible manipulation.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 12:54 AM
1

There's many credible independent studies which have debunked this feminists wage gap myth and even the USA's Department of Labour has debunked it. Feminist distort research and statistics for their radical agenda. See an excerpt here: Department of Labor: Gender Wage Gap a Myth by WELMER on MARCH 8, 2010 Every now and then the Federal Government does a decent job of getting to the heart of the matter. Actually, this happens more frequently than one might think. I used to work with a lot of gove…
/r/MensRights05/06/11 08:43 PM
1

The wage gap is a feminist myth which has been debunked many times. See for example Warren Farrell explain it. Feminists compare the total amount that men earn with the total amount women earn, but disregard factors like employed/unemployed, experience, type of work (women prefer cleaner, safer jobs, while men do much more hazardous, dangerous, heavy work for higher pay) etc. Women take more days off, work more part-time, while men make up the difference and do more full-time jobs.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 11:35 AM
1

In that snippet the author calls certain fathers he encountered "douchebag suggerdaddies". So, the author didn't only use crude language for women in that article. He doesn't rant about despising an entire gender either. I don't like such crude choice of words though.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 10:47 PM
2

This varies per person though. It's isn't representative of MGTOW. I'm totally against misandry and misogyny. There's a difference between occasionally being misandric/misogynistic to vent steam, frustration, hurt etc vs continuously despising specific people based on gender etc.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 09:38 PM
4

The wage gap is a feminist myth which has been debunked many times. See for example Warren Farrell explain it. Feminists compare the total amount that men earn with the total amount women earn, but disregard factors like employed/unemployed, experience, type of work (women prefer cleaner, safer jobs, while men do much more hazardous, dangerous work for higher pay) etc. Women take more days off, work more part-time, while men make up the difference and do more full-time jobs. Unchecked feminism i…
/r/MensRights04/06/11 08:11 PM
9

Well a lot of guys have been burned, and indeed some are angry because of horrible experiences. This is at an individual level though. Nowhere in the MGTOW code or guidelines written by the original founders does it state that such things are an intricate part of it.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 06:12 PM
1

MGTOW is not about hating women at all. It's not called such either.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 05:16 PM
6

Sure, people who join said movements should do so to improve true equality: fair treatment for all, no sexist double standards or preferences based on gender, race, religion etc. That said, the MRM has it's own list of issues such as Family Court Reform, Shared Parenting, Domestic Violence to also acknowledge and support male victims, false abuse allegations, men's issues aren't institutionalized yet etc. So those who join any of such movements for the negative motives you describe are deluded. …
/r/MensRights04/06/11 05:08 PM
1

Such articles promote hateful views that feminists harbor for men. It doesn't reflect what women think in general. Remember feminists don't speak on behalf or in the best interest of women. Just look at their stance on housewives.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 03:07 PM
4

Rampant feminism is the problem, not women.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 02:59 PM
2

Option 12: Get a prenuptial agreement if you live with your significant other, don't marry. Option 13: Find a more traditional non-western woman for a relationship. Option 14: Emigrate to a male-friendly country. Essential: Help or donate with restoring: gender neutrality in domestic violence, shared parenting policy, family court reform (e.g. Fathers & Families), false abuse allegations etc. Protest against obnoxious feminism and sexist double standards. Because, running away won't solve these …
/r/MensRights04/06/11 02:57 PM
-2

I suspect feminists would brush facts aside, and bash it with illogical rhetoric. Because they are blinded by their ideology which can't acknowledge that females can be predators or perpetrators too.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 02:42 PM
1

Domestic Abuse should first of all be viewed at from a gender-neutral perspective. Because DV cases are perpetrated by husbands and wives about 50%. Any abuse, or rape accusation must be accompanied with proof (DNA testing) etc, due to the high amount of false accusations. The accused must always be considered innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 01:04 PM
6

The sexist double standard is that these girls remain unpunished. Yet, if this happenend to an 11 year old girl, there'd surely be punishment and justice.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 12:50 AM
1

That won't work, she can leave at any time, and so can you. It's also immoral. An other option is just to try your best to work things out together. Check how the relationship goes for a couple of years, and be wary of red flags, before you decide to take it to the next level.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 09:43 AM
1

Preference also plays a big role. Women prefer cleaner, safer jobs, while men are more willing to do dirtier, hazardous work for higher pay. Additionally, men often offer their girlfriend the chance to work-part time or be a full-time housewife. Which means they must work full-time to make up the difference. Contrastingly husbands are rarely granted such options by their gf/wives.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 05:28 PM
1

The thing is the original feminists had legitimate claims, but they would turn around in their graves if they could observe modern, radical feminists today. Sure there are women's issues in third world countries, but also men's issues that can be improved. Feminism does not own a copyright of related to "women's rights". So people shouldn't automatically call themselves such given all the negative connotations. I think it's better to call yourself a humanist, egalitarian, woman's rights supporte…
/r/MensRights02/06/11 12:56 PM
1

Right, be together for a couple of years, see how it goes. You don't need to officially marry. You can hold the celebration and everything without signing papers.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 12:51 PM
1

Yeah. Rushing into marriage is one of the biggest mistakes. People should wait until they're at least 25-30 before starting serious relationships or think about marriage (I don't recommend marriage at all though). When divorce does occur, it often brings the worst out of people.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 12:30 PM
1

There will always be people who are smarter, faster, prettier, nicer than others (and the opposite). People are unique, and not created equal. What I mean is Nobody should be given Special Support or Treatment (put on a pedestal) by the government based on their race, gender, beliefs and such. There is no equality when people are held back from their full potential, while a specific group receives exclusive extra support at the expense of the rest of the population.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 12:21 PM
1

That can be part of a prenuptial agreement, but those aren't 100% rock solid.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 12:16 PM
8

The MRM must succeed, because men's issues matter just as much as women's issues. Best solution is to support True Equality: no sexist double standards, fair treatment for all, personal freedom.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 12:15 PM
2

Unfortunately for feminists, the fate of women is tied with that of men. Like Yin and Yang. For their likelihood of surviving the tests of time diminishes greatly without the other. Society can't even survive without men nor advance, for men are the backbone of society, the creators, builders, explorers, risk takers, inventors.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 12:08 PM
1

Get a prenuptial agreement if you live with your significant other keep records of all household income and expenses support shared parenting policies, reasonable alimony and child support limitations, family court reform (organizations like Fathers & Families) perhaps get with a non-western woman, who tend to be more traditional and loyal.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 12:03 PM
5

The high risks of marriage are real for men unfortunately. There is a reason why few rich women marry poor men. It's because women in general Don't Marry Down. While men do. Women don't like a man who is of much lower social, economic status. Rich men do marry poor women, because they don't care much about her social, economic status.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 11:57 AM
3

That's the usual unfounded feminist scare talk and demonization of men.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 11:52 AM
0

I disagree that the sole purpose of marriage was procreation, it's a combination of purposes People can procreate anywhere they want, but surely that was frowned upon back then though. Back in those days, you needed a certain amount of offspring who would take care of you when you're too old and retire and such. Yes I know the Zeta Male, he kind of over dramatizes things occasionally. Let me state that I'm firmly against chivalry, because it creates double standards and expectations for both sex…
/r/MensRights02/06/11 10:19 AM
0

In the past it wasn't just for procreation, but also like a couple who work together towards common goals like a merger of companies. The current state of marriage is for a woman there's much to gain, but for men generally it's a high risk endeavor as described earlier, especially without a prenuptial agreement. Chivalry wasn't as bad back in the day, because both men and women played their part. Keep in mind that "women's liberation" was largely funded by a banker family called Rockefeller, for…
/r/MensRights02/06/11 01:03 AM
10

Okay, well let me stress the wage gap is a myth and not due to discrimination. Some recent studies even show how career minded women gain quicker promotions, not to mention the growing gap in the feminized education system with increasing amount of boys lagging behind or even drop out. The overwhelming portion of the full-time workforce who do all the essential jobs to keep society operational and grow the economy are men. Countries with such negative school trends are hurting themselves. Yeah, …
/r/MensRights01/06/11 11:43 PM
4

Sure there were also problems back then. However, back in those olden days of chivalry it was a different world, and women did uphold their end of the bargain. Marriage was mostly for life, women took care of the household, while men often went out to provide and protect for their families. Now, certain women still expect men to act chivalrous towards them, while not giving anything back nor play their role of acting ladylike to earn such generous treatment.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 11:32 PM
1

No, women aren't the problem, feminism is. Feminism doesn't represent the best interests of women in general. They're severely out of touch with their target group. Just look at how hostile they are towards women who choose to be housewives instead of company employees.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 11:25 PM
4

The system which was corrupted and severely lopsided by decades of unchecked feminism, and its radical leaders.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 11:21 PM
3

The "path of now and forever" description is bad. We don't want to enslave anybody, but want everybody to be treated fairly and equally with no sexist double standards!
/r/MensRights01/06/11 11:13 PM
13

@rantgrrl, I'm all for women's rights, but dislike hypocritical feminists who generally deliberately ignore men's issues or fabricate stuff such as the wage gap myth, false rape statistics, obstruct shared parenting policies etc for ulterior motives. Likewise, I'm for Men's Rights too, and True Equality which doesn't put a specific group of people on a pedestal (extra support, benefits etc), and for personal liberty.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 11:08 PM
44

The pay gap is a debunked feminist myth. They look at the total amount that men earn per year, compared to the total amount that women earn, regardless of the amount of years in the workforce, work experience, or the huge amount of women who work part-time or choose not to have a job, while men make up the difference by working full-time.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 11:03 PM
2

You will talk differently when you read a letter that you must pay 100k dollars/pounds/euros in Child Support for two children you never knew you had, by an ex-gf who tricked you into financial serfdom when she used your frozen sperm. The children are nothing but chess pieces in this manipulation game. To make matters worse, there's no shared parenting law, and secretive, unaccountable family courts are still biased against husbands/fathers etc.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 09:19 AM
1

Glenn Sacks quote: "The facts are very clear. The overwhelming majority of these parents are not deadbeat, they are dead broke. The federal government’s own research shows before the recession over 2/3 of the people behind on the child support earned poverty-level wages. That’s before the recession. During the recession, it’s gotten far worse because courts and the child support enforcement agencies are very, very slow to give fathers and mothers who are behind on their child support downward mo…
/r/MensRights01/06/11 08:54 AM
4

It's an example of prevalent unchallenged misandry in western mass media. People should message the creator, that it's unacceptable to make fun of such needless abuse.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 08:52 AM
1

Well, there's more articles about such pills that have already proven to be effective. When a birth control pill for men hits the mainstream market in Asia (which has the biggest population of the entire world), and sells like hot-cakes while proving to be effective, it won't be long till you see it in America and Europe, because those companies don't want to miss out on potentially huge profits.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 08:47 AM
1

There's actually already some articles about contraceptive "pills" for men under development which showed potential. Such as Indonesia’s Plant-Based Birth Control Pill for Men
/r/MensRights01/06/11 01:10 AM
1

Looks painful. Rather use birth control pills for men, when that becomes widely available.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 12:42 AM
1

I meant renting rooms within households, buildings for students.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 07:16 AM
43

This is a prevalent sexist double standard with renting rooms for students.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 09:08 AM
3

Well played sir!
/r/MensRights28/05/11 09:07 AM
2

Yeah, the secretive family courts are still biased against fathers though who are usually the main bread winner.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 05:23 PM
7

People can make up their own minds. However, as shown there's overwhelming credible scientific evidence of the harmful effects of male circumcision, and how in most cases it's completely unnecessary.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 01:12 PM
13

The sources are clearly visible, you can look it up.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:41 PM
7

This is not just an opinion. The sexist double standard is obvious. For example some excerpts: Circumcision Removes the Most Sensitive Parts of the Penis A sensitivity study of the adult penis in circumcised and uncircumcised men shows that the uncircumcised penis is significantly more sensitive. The most sensitive location on the circumcised penis is the circumcision scar on the ventral surface. Five locations on the uncircumcised penis that are routinely removed at circumcision are significant…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:32 PM
2

You're fine with it, because you don't know any better. You'll never know what it's like to have a natural intact penis with foreskin, due to your parents forced upon decision to mutilate your penis while you were a defenseless baby.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:04 PM
12

There's many forms of female mutilation, such as removing labia, which is all illegal. Nevertheless, it's still a sexist double standard that it's okay to remove the foreskin of a baby boy where in most cases it's completely unnecessary, and risky (when the mutilation procedure goes awry). There's many good reasons why the natural foreskin exists on an intact penis if you do some research. Any baby should be able to decide by himself later in life if he wants circumcision. These needless irrever…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 11:57 AM
0

Alright mate. I'm definitely relevant btw.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 11:24 AM
0

Misandry is the hatred of males, while misogyny is the hatred of females. Note that certain dictionaries or Word don't yet recognize the word misandry.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 07:57 PM
9

I'm not just talking about you, I'm talking about feminism in general. Feel free to use whatever word to describe yourself, just keep in mind the negative connotations. A person who is for women's rights, does not necessarily have to be called a "feminist", as stated before. It could be a woman's rights supporter, humanist etc. Islam is vastly different from feminism. It's like comparing an apple with a rotten tomato which desperately wants to appear fresh.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 03:07 PM
13

The dictionary definition is not how feminism as a movement acts in general. This article that feminists don't want the same pensionable age as men, though it's completely in line with True Equality (no double standards based on gender, race or beliefs) is a good example of this stark contrast between dictionary and reality. A big problem is that for decades now these radical feminists have been allowed to lead the feminist movement, they've not been condemned much and continue to impose their i…
/r/MensRights18/05/11 02:53 PM
10

Feminists only want "equality" when it benefits them, they don't want negatives that are attached to "equality". Sure not all feminists are the same, but those radical feminist leaders are still in charge who continue to impose their almost religious ideology upon everybody (e.g. disdain for housewives, wage gap myth, vawa which excludes male victims etc). For example Harriet Harman hasn't been denounced by other feminists to the point of being removed from power to restore some credibility. You…
/r/MensRights18/05/11 02:22 PM
29

Equal rights comes with equal responsibilities. Besides there's a major life expectancy gap in which men still die a couple of years earlier on average in many western countries. This is partially due to the sheer lack of attention and funding to male specific medical issues, and the more hazardous and dangerous jobs that men do.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 01:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter