TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BrokenArrows95 Archive

View 0 posts and 107 comments by BrokenArrows95 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Beats me, I’m the opposite. Sex is great but not nearly worth all that hassle. When I meet someone I want to have sex with, I tend to want them to stick around. Sex is a fun thing I do with partners I already want to be around for other reasons. Just the sex by itself with nothing else would feel so meaningless, I’d rather take care of myself and save myself a ton of time.
/r/ExRedPill04/08/24 02:41 AM
1

I understand. I am always curious were people draw that line. Like is a person thats had 5 oral/hand only partners, are they a virgin? Just an interesting thought experiment
/r/ExRedPill03/08/24 06:55 PM
5

1 is on the low end but average hovers between 5-10 depending on a ton of factors so people going crazy about body count are really overselling how many different partners most people have
/r/ExRedPill03/08/24 05:47 PM
5

Just curious, when you count a partner, is it any sexual activity or purely vaginal sex?
/r/ExRedPill03/08/24 05:45 PM
1

I’d say your group is on the lower side of average. Calling someone with 5 partners promiscuous would be really funny to the higher than average groups. Based on what little studies on the subject are available the averages are typically sub 10 but depend heavily on the culture the people are in. Most people the averages really start to flatten in the mid twenties and beyond. People start having really long term relationships and way less partners over time
/r/ExRedPill03/08/24 05:44 PM
30

Imagine seeing men as individuals but thinking women are a monolith. TRP in a nutshell.
/r/ExRedPill20/06/24 07:38 PM
43

Idk about you but I certainly do not want to get with every woman. You sound desperate as fuck.
/r/ExRedPill18/06/24 11:10 PM
-2

Most women won’t cheat on you. They will either not date you at all or break up with you
/r/ExRedPill12/06/24 02:10 AM
14

They really don’t. How hard it is to understand that all people are generally into other people that are fit and well groomed and not socially inept? It’s not some conspiracy
/r/ExRedPill09/06/24 04:36 PM
41

How many guys absolutely drool over Victoria secret models and then get offended women are attracted to the same thing but in masculine form?
/r/ExRedPill09/06/24 10:05 AM
3

Socializing and not being afraid to fail are keys to having relationships. So many times making the next step in your life will require you to take a chance and if you refuse to take the risk of looking foolish, you’ll never go anywhere
/r/ExRedPill04/06/24 01:19 AM
4

I don’t like hookups either. Perfectly fine to bond with someone before having sex and maintain a relationship after. In fact, most women seem to prefer this.
/r/ExRedPill28/05/24 03:46 AM
2

Yea but you lost half your audience when you said attractive men get all the hookups. So ugly guys are the support characters according to your own post? I’m not getting the same warm fuzzy feeling other comments are saying. Guys are gonna want a woman that’s crazy about them, that includes physical attraction. Stating the hot guys are getting the hot sex but don’t worry girls will want to stick around you cause you don’t treat them like trash… That’s not saying they are physically attracted to …
/r/ExRedPill26/05/24 04:47 AM
8

I don’t know what you’re actually doing because you just made generalizations. It sounds like you need to take a serious account of what you are actually doing to meet women. Where are you trying to meet them? What are saying to them?
/r/ExRedPill17/05/24 06:56 PM
1

Not really because the claims aren’t substantial. Don’t look or smell like a bag of shit and actually put some effort into social interactions
/r/ExRedPill14/05/24 10:25 PM
8

It works a lot better than the “take zero shots” approach most incels use
/r/ExRedPill14/05/24 03:47 PM
6

Yea that’s bullshit lol. Maybe if their husbands put zero effort in and let themselves go to shit. Have to put in some effort. A lot of men just assume married means they don’t have to do shit and their wives have to sleep with them. Would you think that way about a girlfriend or a new relationship? Nah, have to put in the effort still.
/r/ExRedPill14/05/24 03:46 PM
3

There are a lot of women that aren’t into the pumped and dumped scene. However, think about how many men are just looking for just casual sex and you’ll find a similar (yet actually lower due to culture) number of women that like the same thing. Some people just like to have sex and don’t care about attaching it to a relationship at all. Some people are the opposite and really only care about the relationship. Most people are in the middle somewhere. You gotta find what you want and go after it.…
/r/ExRedPill14/05/24 03:42 PM
3

That’s not true at all. The male equivalent is hitting the gym, being well groomed, and having the bare minimum fashion sense. That’s all you need.
/r/ExRedPill26/04/24 03:37 PM
15

I mean being physically attractive is always a help. Just look at how easy it is for physically attractive women. It’s the same for men but women actually are a little less picky for physical attractiveness so it works out in men’s favor. Women are also constantly working on their looks. Makeup, clothes, diet, most women are putting in far more work than men to look good. Last, if you’re not talking to women and trying for relationships or hookups, nothing is gonna happen. You could be Brad Pitt…
/r/ExRedPill25/04/24 10:24 PM
94

So many factors. Do they talk like that to the women? Are they physically fit and well groomed? Do they have a lot of confidence and put themselves out there? Are they funny and charming outside of their misogyny? Are they the only ones approaching? You can hide a lot of you’re only talking to someone for a couple days.
/r/ExRedPill25/04/24 01:30 PM
35

Contrary to what most people here will say, I think it’s fine to be turned away by someone’s sexual preferences. If you’re very sexually conservative, I don’t see any issues with preferring a sexually conservative partner. BUT it’s not okay to shame people for their sexual preferences. You are either fine with it and go about your life or you stop seeing them and go about your life.
/r/ExRedPill27/10/22 05:12 AM
25

40 yo virgin is a cringefest. We don’t need people thinking they need to have sex to have a fulfilling life. We don’t need the children born from placing sex on a pedestal and all the other problems this causes. If someone doesn’t want to date or have sex that’s their right. People should mind their own business. The stigma placed on sex and relationships is how we end up with shit like the red pill and Andrew Tate.
/r/ExRedPill28/09/22 06:08 AM
1

In any country where white is the majority I would agree. Being in the majority ethnic or racial group tends to have benefits.
/r/ExRedPill17/05/22 12:52 PM
1

All those things are fixable. Life is about failing until you succeed. You just need to have the courage to fail and keep going.
/r/ExRedPill19/04/22 02:11 PM
7

No. Why would turning 30 make you suddenly appear older than 29? Aging is a gradual process and different for everyone. Some people in their 30s look younger than people in their 20s.
/r/ExRedPill21/09/21 10:51 PM
4

The TRP response to that would be that he doesn't have female friends and it would be true if they actually followed TRP mindset. According to TRP, women can't be friends with men.
/r/ExRedPill17/08/21 07:07 PM
4

Not only is this pure cringe, but he didn't even follow TRP teaching. When I was pilled, I remember reading a ton of posts stating that saying you are alpha is a no-no. He literally just says he's an alpha... If you posted this to TRP, they would be calling this guy a beta for sure. He should definitely get help.
/r/ExRedPill17/08/21 07:06 PM
18

This also devalues any man that doesn't feel the need to have sex with as many women as possible.
/r/ExRedPill11/08/21 12:54 AM
6

I think he is just calling out cultures tend to follow exactly the same pattern as the TRP quote. As in, if a women goes around saying she's slept with 100 men, I doubt anyone is going to be hyping her up about it. Flip it around and I bet many men would hype a man up about sleeping with 100 women. Not saying it's good, it's an observation about the culture.
/r/ExRedPill11/08/21 12:49 AM
7

It sounds exhausting. Sex is great but damn 150 casual hookups sounds torturous. At that point it's like your life.
/r/ExRedPill16/07/21 12:58 AM
15

I didn't even make it 3 minutes into this. Holy shit that's terrible.
/r/ExRedPill18/06/21 10:12 PM
10

It works the same way anything does. You do it enough times and get better at it. If you spend countless hours flirting, you're gonna get pretty good at it. Then they try to be in relationships and realize it's a completely different skill set. Back to square one!
/r/ExRedPill15/05/21 07:19 PM
18

TRP also acts like women in their early twenties are dying to date men in there 30s, 40s, 50s. Not quite. People tend to like partners reasonably close to their age. There are outlier's but it's not the norm. They also act like men don't hit a wall aka get older. Everyone gets older. How many men were in terrific shape in high school and college but are now rocking dad bods? TRP strategy is all about treating the one off, outliers, as if it was the normal. It's about fear mongering. Playing off …
/r/ExRedPill17/04/21 03:12 PM
7

You can find evolutionary psychology studies to support their reasons You can find studies for anything. That doesn't mean they are good, peer reviewed studies a lot of people see success after applying their techniques Their most successful techniques are getting in shape and having confidence. Groundbreaking tips there... the philosophy/theory itself has some logical info backing it up. How about the theory of AWALT? Hypergamy? These are bullshit. The only logical thing is that being in shape …
/r/ExRedPill10/04/21 05:07 PM
11

They have terrible logic and their "research" is even worse. Cherry picked, terrible structured studies with little to no peer review. The logic is garbage. Full of logical fallacies.
/r/ExRedPill10/04/21 02:41 PM
1

Also, people are nervous to see themselves in the camera. If you repeat this until you are not nervous, you won't be as nervous talking to others either.
/r/ExRedPill08/03/21 02:49 PM
3

Really? I've never had a woman ask me that. I always assumed it was because there is still, unfortunately, a stigma on women being sexual (slut shaming), in my area of the US at least. Asking about my history opens up the conversation to her history which opens the door tob potentially get shamed. Just own it. It is what it is. Like you said, you're going to have to get past it eventually. When they ask just tell the truth. You haven't been dating because you were focused on your career. Now you…
/r/ExRedPill15/02/21 03:10 PM
7

Why would it even come up? I doubt the girl will want to talk about it. Just find people you like and go from there.
/r/ExRedPill15/02/21 05:23 AM
1

Very good points. I fit the first guys description except I married the girl and I'm still not 30 so my view is very limited. Overall, it doesnt seem to matter as long as everyone in the relationship is on the same page.
/r/ExRedPill11/02/21 01:40 AM
3

That's a good point!
/r/ExRedPill11/02/21 01:29 AM
4

I assumed that the ages were the same when comparing counts. I agree that the older people get the higher their number will likely be. That's just a factor of being alive longer. Not sure what you mean by more sexual. A person can be very sexual and open with people they choose but also not choose many people. I assume they were both the same age? I've know people who were very flirty but didn't sleep with many people. They were just extroverted people that liked the social interactions but ther…
/r/ExRedPill10/02/21 09:06 PM
15

This seems pretty reasonable. If you are reserved and prefer to limit your partners, I don't see any reason why you couldn't hold your potential partners to the same views. Aka if you're not into hookups it doesn't seem odd to prefer partners that also are not into hookups. People literally are getting judged on their appearance all day, every day. Getting judged based on your actions seems to be more reasonable in comparison.
/r/ExRedPill10/02/21 05:20 PM
5

I think that's fine if it is true. If someone views sex as something very special and to be reserved for special people in their lives, that's 100% fine. I also wouldn't blame theme for not wanting to be with people that don't have the same view. The problem comes when they clearly don't have that view (frequently hookup) but expect that view for others.
/r/ExRedPill10/02/21 05:17 PM
8

Seems like the more important thing is that the expectations of what sex means to each person matches. Number could correlate with that meaning, but it seems flawed. I think the way TRP portrays it is utter non-sense. If someone is reserved and has single digit count, i doubt they are going to match well with someone in the triple digits. Not necessarily because of the count itself, but more because of what factors lead into someone having a high versus low count. Assuming the people are the sam…
/r/ExRedPill10/02/21 05:12 PM
3

Are you asking women out? You have to make an effort to actually be in relationships.
/r/ExRedPill14/01/21 02:31 AM
1

Yes. It passes if you can't tell is a robot.
/r/ExRedPill16/12/20 03:55 PM
2

You're making an emotional argument. If it passes the Turing test, you wouldn't even know it wasn't human. You'd literally think it was human.
/r/ExRedPill16/12/20 02:09 PM
4

How about communicating that your interested in a romantic relationship.
/r/ExRedPill13/12/20 02:58 PM
6

They're so worried about women trapping them yet they encourage casual sex, the easiest way to get trapped by an unwanted pregnancy. Why have sex at all if your worried about how terrible women are? Why not just insulate yourself from these terrible people? TRP is obsessed with women. It's all they think about. Its a cult. Instead of promoting healthy relationships they play some crazy delusional games pretending that women are naturally devious and will cheat on your or trap you for money or so…
/r/ExRedPill24/11/20 12:45 AM
1

The only truths from Redpill are based on the fact that people are attracted to confident, fit, independent, people. It's not exactly a crazy revalation.
/r/ExRedPill17/11/20 02:34 PM
3

Your mistake is think those are mutually exclusive
/r/ExRedPill17/11/20 02:30 PM
6

For people going their own way, they sure do care about who women have sex with. Same with red pill. They really care about women but pretend not to care.
/r/ExRedPill18/08/20 04:16 AM
1

Yes those things happen but it also happens against every other race and gender. As for the TV and media, they both get paid to entertain or sell something. Sensationalism is the norm because it sells. Everything is exaggerated to make a buck. There has been 1 non white president and he was still male. Similar trend with CEOs and other high level positions. There are some women and non white males but majority is still white and male. If you go back a decade, even more white and male. So minorit…
/r/ExRedPill25/05/20 02:29 PM
4

So have standards and adhere to your standards? This isn't breaking news. You don't have to be an asshole to do it either. Also, white men have been the top of the pyramid for a long, long time. The Constitution was literally written by white men. What kind of injustice are white men the primary recipient of?
/r/ExRedPill25/05/20 01:06 PM
15

You mean confidence and taking time to make yourself look more attractive works? I would think so. What part of TRP works? Who does it work on? What is the mechanism that makes it successful? These are the questions you should be asking of any hypothesis. You've taken this massive amount of changes and lumped it into "TRP works". To figure out if it works, you would need to isolate every change and test it. You would need to test it on a massive amount of very diverse women. This is why there is…
/r/ExRedPill11/07/19 11:46 AM
1

You take the risk if you want the reward. If you honestly don’t care about anything relating to women, then it seems reasonable to not risk it.
/r/ExRedPill25/06/19 11:46 PM
2

Do you actually have any statistics for these mistreatment’s? What is the statistical chance that a woman will falsely accuse a man of rape vs the chance that a woman will be raped and then keep quiet out of shame or fear? Where is the stat for how many divorces end with a reasonable agreement for both parties vs a one sided settlement? How many settlements go one sided in favor of the man? This is the trap of TRP. They will cherry pick select articles or anecdotal experiences to give a false vi…
/r/ExRedPill25/06/19 09:44 PM
3

It's incredibly hard to get solid evidence for the "soft" social sciences. That's why it's rampant with misinformation. Also people are very emotionally driven which is the opposite of logic. That's how things like TRP happen. They feed off the paranoia with cherry-picked articles and "studies". I have, anecdotally, found a lot of people stay in really terrible relationships just because they don't want to single and put in the work to meet another person. That seems like a perfect seed for infi…
/r/ExRedPill24/06/19 12:14 PM
21

Just a guess, they are looking for a hook-up.
/r/ExRedPill16/04/19 11:13 PM
4

If he bought into the red pill teachings, there is probably something in the relationship he doesn't like that he thinks the red pill will solve. I would find that issue.
/r/ExRedPill04/01/19 09:51 PM
1

That depends entirely on the grouping of men and women you select. My point is, the more people you include, the closer the averages become until eventually they will always be the same. It's the mathematical truth. You can select random groupings and get any result you want but thats only part of the whole picture.
/r/ExRedPill22/01/18 07:17 PM
1

My statement required you include ALL heterosexual people. Yes you can skew the average when you pick two people at random, but if you take all those 12 other people they slept with, and all the people those people slept with, etc... Until you account for everyone the average is equal. Or you could do the statistics on groups that can only have sex with other people within the group. Example: there are 500 men and 500 women in the world. The women all sleep with only 250 of those 500 men. Now 25…
/r/ExRedPill22/01/18 07:01 PM
1

We don't actually know if that is true. Average men can pressure average women into sex. Hell even below average men could do that. Each encounter is a new partner for a man and a women which makes the averages the same. Point being that we don't know. The studies are sparse and not revealing of any hard facts. People do things for all sorts of reasons. Statistically speaking, women can't have more male partners on average than males do females. The median can be skewed, ex. 4 for men and 6 for …
/r/ExRedPill22/01/18 05:48 PM
0

The averages can not be different, assuming only heterosexual persons are included, only the distribution among that average.
/r/ExRedPill22/01/18 05:34 PM
7

The averages would have to be the same. What you're saying is that women would be centered towards the average while men would be either super high or super low. That's basically TRPs motto. Chads get all the girls the rest get none. All women sleep around. We are arguing ancedotes but I also don't believe that the spread of partner counts for men and women would look similar. While women theoretically could have sex easier, there are a lot of other factors influencing this. Some examples would …
/r/ExRedPill22/01/18 04:53 PM
2

I agree with this. The real fact here is that people can and will judge you and everyone else on whatever they feel like judging you on. It's not fair and never will be. If person doesn't want a partner with a high count and you have a high count, you're out of luck.
/r/ExRedPill22/01/18 04:30 PM
6

I think there is, I lumped it into not being socially adept enough to have a high number count. I also think there is a strong correlation with people who have high number counts not caring about high number counts. If you have had 15 partners and your current partner has had 15 partners, why would you care? The problem is when a person with 15 is with a person with 2 or some significantly smaller number. Then the issue is why are the numbers so different. Could be a values mismatch, could be so…
/r/ExRedPill22/01/18 04:13 PM
5

It's probably not the actual "science" that people are looking at. People have a reason that they are not okay with high partner counts. Maybe they obstained from sex for moral, religious, or some other reason and expect the same from a partner. Maybe they went through a bad social phase and would prefer the same from a partner. Maybe they are a hippocrite and just don't want a partner that did what they did. Maybe they watch a lot of porn and project the crazy stuff they watch there to women of…
/r/ExRedPill22/01/18 11:33 AM
2

I believe that regardless of what anyone says, it's your choice on what factors bother you about another person. If you feel that having tons of sex is a deal breaker then that's your choice. Personally I would feel awkward being in a relationship with someone with a largely more permiscuous past than my own. It goes deeper than just the actual sexual acts, it's a values, decision making, morals, etc. I also think that what you find uncomfortable will match your own experience. If you have been …
/r/ExRedPill04/12/17 01:25 AM
2

Didn't think her response was that great.
/r/ExRedPill09/11/17 05:09 PM
0

This situation seems a bit strange to me. I've always associated TRP with more of feeling frustrated with women than feeling inadequate with money or career path. I guess so you are doing so well he feels inadequate? Even so, boldly claiming he is red pill is not something TRP would preach. In fact, you making all the money and still wanting to be with him is kind of a textbook disconnect from TRP. Assuming you were still regularly physical before the change, he was in a marriage with a woman ma…
/r/ExRedPill12/08/17 12:39 AM
13

The red pill would never advocate saying something like he was red pill now.
/r/ExRedPill12/08/17 12:27 AM
8

The flaw with that is the same flaw as TRP, you don't actually have anything creditable to prove your statement.
/r/ExRedPill20/07/17 09:42 PM
28

You are the exact person that TRP is most effective on. Low self esteem, willing to accept "evidence" based on no facts, and angry.
/r/ExRedPill18/07/17 10:28 AM
5

If you don't like the things she has done, you can always stop dating her. You don't have to be okay with her sexual history. If you don't like her past because you wouldn't do the things she has done and don't feel comfortable with it, then don't date her.
/r/ExRedPill18/07/17 01:44 AM
9

Culture and personal values. Seems a classic trap of TRP followers. They claim to be searching for women of specific values but display values that will not attract any and go to places those women likely would not be frequenting.
/r/ExRedPill28/03/17 10:19 AM
6

That makes no sense. People shouldn't respect you for being angry at them. Just think that over for a while. Why would you respect someone that's always mad at you? Just screams emotional issues. Half of TRP follows this same philosophy. They have issues from a bad relationship, they go out and personify that relationship, and attract the exact people who will fulfill that personification. It's a cycle of attracting the people they don't like because their attitude attracts those people.
/r/ExRedPill27/03/17 06:37 PM
6

It's sad how true that seems to be. However​ I have seen women with healthy relationships with their dads end up with complete trash. Problem with social sciences is that it feels completely devoid of any hard facts. There are so many variables that making any hard, fast rule seems doomed to failure. I will agree that if a women gets more into the less you care about her, it's probably a bad sign.
/r/ExRedPill27/03/17 06:30 PM
17

The problem here is that it's really complex. I suggest reading Models by Mark Manson. He talks about the dynamic of dating in the states vs overseas. Basically says in the US no one expects you to just walk up and say a bunch of blunt true things. Example: I think you are really attractive and would like to go get coffee with you sometime. It's almost expected that positive emotions are portrayed through playful negatives like when a bunch of guys call each other weird names. It's a cultural th…
/r/ExRedPill27/03/17 10:12 AM
6

This is the kind of shit that really messed me up when I was a TRP follower. The "logic" paralyzed me because their was never an answer that ended with the girl being good. Always ended with she's playing you or had a ton of sex or whatever they felt like pushing.
/r/ExRedPill21/03/17 02:34 AM
1

Does that mean you hate Cara??
/r/ExRedPill06/03/17 02:48 PM
11

A post that cites 9 references and actually uses them in the content to make a logical conclusion. Something you'd be very hard pressed to find on TRP. A very convincing part of TRP for me, was the use of "studies" to prove points. What I didn't question at the time was whether the conclusions drawn matched the data from the study or even if the study was conducted correctly. Going back through the threads, most studies are cherry picked to make a specific point. Neglected are any studies that m…
/r/ExRedPill01/03/17 11:31 AM
7

People tend to attract people similar to them. If you play mind games, hang out in bars and clubs, and like casual sex, chances are good you'll attract people who do the same. TRP is a self fulfilling cult. The "strategies" are killing their ability to weed out the people most likely to do all the things they live to pin on women. Apply some critical thinking and you can see TRP has no real scientific backing. It's all ancedotal. Think about this, some women take advantage of the system and clai…
/r/ExRedPill24/02/17 10:56 PM
13

I think a lot of guys in TRP are always trying to draw this huge line between men and women. Would you rather date a really attractive woman with money or an ugly woman in tons of debt? Would you find it hard to resist an attractive woman hitting on you in a bar? Almost every point they make can be made for both genders. The best way to crack TRP is to apply the arguments to men.
/r/ExRedPill19/02/17 12:39 AM
9

Many of the points brought up by TRP are good. Self improvement is a great way to be more attractive to women. I would have to look up studies on hypergamy to make any reasonable argument against it. If I remember correctly, a major flaw of TRP is that it makes bold claims with little to no evidence. It may make sense that men would want quantity and women quality from an evolutionary standpoint, but I haven't seen any evidence to back that.
/r/ExRedPill06/12/16 02:07 AM
1

Mark Manson's Models was a good book imo. It was refreshing to see someone state the somewhat obvious fact that confidence in yourself is one of the most attractive features because it generally makes you a more enjoyable person to be around. If you're confident, you can take teasing or even flat out rejection without causing uncomfortable drama. It's a contagious attitude that lets people be comfortable and enjoy themselves more in your company.
/r/ExRedPill02/12/16 03:23 PM
14

Which is funny considering the things they teach are supposed to be above getting caught in drama.
/r/ExRedPill02/12/16 03:18 PM
64

Something that helped break the TRP mindset for me is realizing a lot of their claims for women can be applied to men. Hypergamy basically breakdown into always wanting something better than what you have. I've known many men to jump at any hot women that shows them interest regardless of their relationship status. The whole alpha beta thing breaks down to, people like attractive people. Would you rather sleep with a supermodel or one of the women from My 600 lb Life? Same for women. They like g…
/r/ExRedPill02/12/16 11:00 AM
5

TRP bases it's beliefs on ideas that are not proven and are very difficult, if not impossible, to disprove. To any rational person, that should suspicious.
/r/ExRedPill31/10/16 10:37 AM
1

I think a lot of guys complain about their SOs bot wanting more sex. Just curious, have you tried being more aggressive physically about it? Not hitting or threatening physical but just walking in and kissing her up against a wall physical. I don't think you're TRP. You havent even told me how many plates you spin or AWALT
/r/ExRedPill31/10/16 10:26 AM
1

I thought it was funny TRP suggested mark manson. I read his first book and thought it was nothing like TRP. No schemes, just say what you want. If you get rejected, oh well.
/r/ExRedPill29/09/16 02:35 AM
10

TRP can be disproven just by asking,"Where is the evidence?" The only things I have seen out of that subreddit are anecdotes and cherry-picked, poorly conducted "studies". As for rape, the last study I read about it, a lot women don't say a word about it out of fear of being judged. There is a stigma that goes with being a victim of rape. Just look back at the general TRP opinion of it. They recommend ditching any rape victim, real or not. Not many want to attach that stigma to themselves and mo…
/r/ExRedPill26/04/16 02:37 AM
4

I do not think TBP is of much help to get over TRP. I was caught by TRP because it appealed to my insecurities and hid under "data". It was basically trying to be a scientifically proven way to master social interactions, specifically with women. Very appealing and very fictitious. I stay away from TRP and TBP.
/r/ExRedPill11/04/16 09:30 PM
19

All TRP made me was more insecure. Everything became something. Every sentence from women was a secret code. Every action could have secret meaning. Girls were constantly looking to cheat. No one could be trusted. It's unhealthy and severely damaging. I still feel the effects after over a year out.
/r/ExRedPill11/04/16 02:01 AM
6

Sounds like she just isn't into the relationship anymore. Of course that is with no real info on the details of your relationship.
/r/ExRedPill28/03/16 11:43 PM
4

This is right on the mark. Most people will find people that are in great shape and have nice facial features attractive. Girls find men like that attractive, guys find women like that attractive. It's not rocket science. Unfortunately you only have so much control of this. Guys that are physically attractive automatically get an advantage just like girls that are physically attractive.
/r/ExRedPill07/03/16 12:28 AM
14

This is one if the hardest parts of getting past TRP, realizing it's not just women that do these things. Anyone can cheat, lie, abuse, etc. Just imagine what it's like for a woman that was raped. Try to trust someone after that. People as a whole can do some really messed up shit.
/r/ExRedPill24/02/16 01:03 PM
13

The thing I find most disturbing about TRP is the false dichotomy they paint of the female male relationship. Men and women are both capable of the same terrible things. I've known men who constantly cheat on women and rationalize it away. Men will lie and use women just as much as women will do to men. The barrier isn't what women do vs what men will do. The barrier is much closer to what people will do to other people for their own selfish gains. The evidence and statistics they use are faulty…
/r/ExRedPill03/01/16 08:29 PM
20

The general masses of TRP are obsessed with sex. So much so that that define their worth as "alpha" around being about to have as much sex as possible. One of their tenants is to be outcome independent and yet they still define success as closing with women. It's a hypocritical culture that slams women for having casual sex while praising men for the same. If a person is willing to sleep around then they should not judge another that does the same, regardless of gender.
/r/ExRedPill03/01/16 08:05 PM
12

I haven't had a chance to read through all of your links yet but I would like to propose that the real danger of TRP mind sets is that it teaches a view of male an female relationships that is essentially a false dichotomy. The factors that weigh into the male female relationship are myriad and go beyond biology. Another problem arises from the lack of conclusive, quality studies proving the rules that TRP preaches. Social science is a soft science filled with misconceptions and faulty data. I r…
/r/ExRedPill23/12/15 10:16 PM
10

Tell him to take a look at models by mark manson. It helped me find a different point of view other than TRP. TRP does a great job at protecting itself by instructing men that women don't know what they want and will tell half truths and lies without even thinking. That's why he acts the way he does when you try to open up. He has been instructed that your testing him, and that is the way he passes.
/r/ExRedPill07/12/15 11:32 AM
2

What you've said about TRP are the points I found good about the reddit but it goes much deeper than that. The bloggers they look to, respected members, etc tend to be extreme in their views. They take evidence that suits them and use it and throw out the rest. My personal opinion of TRP is that they are trying to make theories and rules for gender interactions but most come into it with a set outcome in mind and therefore skew any data to match what they want. If you read some chateau heartiste…
/r/ExRedPill27/07/15 10:54 AM
1

TRP has some very valid points and some points that are trying to make guidelines for things that can't be backed by solid science at the moment. Things like how to know if someone will cheat or if they are more likely to. There are so many variables that getting hard facts is unlikely. Just look at studies for average sex partners. They vary far too much for my tastes. People are pressured by culture and that makes it difficult to gather accurate data. I find many of the views to be hypocritica…
/r/ExRedPill26/07/15 03:52 PM
2

One of the most popular is the false dichotomy that you are either alpha or beta.
/r/ExRedPill25/07/15 10:20 PM
2

I really enjoy the New England skeptical societies website and podcast, the skeptics guide to the universe. There is also r/skeptic.
/r/ExRedPill23/06/15 02:41 AM
8

From what I remember of the red pill, it was full of logical fallacies and anecdotal evidence. I have recently learned a great deal about skeptic practices and when I applied it to the red pill it was like a curtain being lifted. Some of the claims may be true, some may be false. The facts seem to point to there not being any real evidence of either conclusion.
/r/ExRedPill21/06/15 03:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter