TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Epiphanic_Eros Archive

View 0 posts and 664 comments by Epiphanic_Eros on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Why would you be embarrassed that people knew you liked a girl? Own it. And if she doesn’t reciprocate, let it go and move on. No big deal
/r/seduction20/08/24 04:09 PM
27

Looks are super important for online dating. For meeting people in real life, they're certainly helpful. There's 100 good reasons to start working out regularly and eating a healthy diet of mostly plants, and women are definitely one of them. But it's not as important as people make it out to be
/r/seduction19/08/24 07:02 PM
2

If she's fearing sexual assault, she's not relaxed and having fun. Every guy will be rejected in cold approach most of the time. That's just facts. But the colder the approach, the less context or fittingness of the approach, the higher the odds of rejection. The more relaxed the situation can be, the less jarring or odd the approach, the higher your odds of some kind of connection. But most times she's just not going to be into you, for a million perfectly valid reasons that are completely outs…
/r/seduction19/08/24 03:10 PM
2

Being nice is for scared people (and Minnesotans). Being centered and kind is what a genuinely confident person does. But, of course, she needs to be getting wet. AND she needs to be feeling relaxed and having fun. It’s not one or the other, it’s both.
/r/seduction19/08/24 02:18 PM
0

Speaking to my close women friends, especially the beautiful ones, both SA and harassment by suitors has been WAY more common than I ever expected. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t approach women — just find ways to let them know you’re dtf, and yet you’re not going to rape them or follow them down the street shouting “Fuck you, slut,” if they reject you
/r/seduction19/08/24 01:47 PM
0

Women, quite rightly, are afraid of men. Especially men that are not in their social circle and don’t have clear social proof. Not only is SA extraordinarily common, but most women have many experiences of men turning into vicious assholes, and/or stalkers, when they’re given an opportunity and then rejected. Make them comfortable, and a little hot. Demonstrate that you’re safe in the world, but dangerous in bed.
/r/seduction19/08/24 01:10 PM
2

Women love poets and musicians, too. It shows you have the skills to handle the world and other people
/r/seduction19/08/24 12:18 PM
2

Get out of your head. Meditation and exercise help. When you’re with a woman you’re attracted to, center yourself in your heart and/or your cock.
/r/seduction17/08/24 04:23 PM
17

A woman’s pussy is only slightly more sensual, even sexual, than her lips or breasts or hips or thoughts or hands or feet, etc. You can ravish a woman without touching her pussy. And next time you’re out with a woman, stop after two drinks
/r/seduction16/08/24 03:41 PM
3

Indirect, but slightly flirtations so that you can get a sense for her openness. I like them to want me by the end, where they’re hoping I’m going to ask for their number
/r/seduction16/08/24 12:21 AM
2

Long game is the best game. But it’s not what you’re doing right now. Long game is planting the seeds with a bunch of women by flirting just a bit, over and over, for weeks and months. Obviously, you need to be in a context where you’ll likely see them again. You develop a rapport with each one, and each one should be exciting to you in some way. You’re trying to get them to think about you when they’re at home, and to crush on you a bit. You’re forward, clearly sexually interested, but never ma…
/r/seduction13/08/24 11:35 PM
2

You’ll find someone really amazing. Then it’s time to be a man and make a commitment. These days, nonmonogamy is an option, as well, but you should be up front about wanting that, from the beginning
/r/seduction13/08/24 09:56 PM
6

Very true
/r/seduction11/08/24 03:36 AM
1

I agree, your response seems appropriate to the tone on the comment. AndI agree with you that you can largely discard the Game stuff that PUA do. But there is wisdom here, too. Specifically, the type of seduction suggested in Models, and frequently here, is more important than ever. You need to be always seducing her, unless you want to break up with her. If you don’t want to seduce her, suddenly, then give it a few months, talk to her about it, and if you can’t get back the mojo, just break up …
/r/seduction07/08/24 05:41 PM
17

In bed, I love her eyes to be soft and delicate and VERY tender and submissive. In the seduction stage, before I’ve captured her, I like when her eyes flash and she’s challenge and fire and a little intimation of submission
/r/seduction07/08/24 02:26 PM
2

It seems like there’s what women think they should want, there’s what they actually want in a man for a relationship, and there’s what turns them on. Most women want a civilized man who is strong but kind, and competent. But there’s a whole lot of women whose panties get all wet at the thought of a big guy throwing them around and being able to lift them like a child, if that strength is channeled toward desiring and caring for her.
/r/seduction06/08/24 06:27 AM
9

NYC is far better. There’s way more young women than young men. The women who are drawn to NYC are beautiful. Everyone has style. They’re educated and doing cool stuff. And everyone is outside, in the streets and in shops and in parks and etc. LA had some beautiful women, but they’re more plastic TV types. Lots of visible plastic surgery. They’re desperate for a break into film/TV. And they’re in their cars or at some producer’s party
/r/seduction05/08/24 08:50 PM
2

You’re dedicated to your disability - hope you enjoy it! Depends on what one means by success! 🤣. In this context of opening with someone, success means someone openly engages with you in a moment of friendly interaction Personally, I’d assert that you’ll have about the same success as a handsome man and an ugly one (exceptions for the top and bottom 2% or so). And I’d go further! I’d assert that you’ll have about the same success with men as with women! You’ll have a little less success with ve…
/r/seduction05/08/24 07:25 PM
8

You moved into Nice Guy territory. Too intimate for a normal friend meetup, not flirty or arousing enough for a date. You knew it was a date. She knew it was a date. But then you connected with your head and a little with your heart. Next time you’re on a date, bring your energy to your heart and your cock, and engage with the woman from there.
/r/seduction05/08/24 05:54 PM
4

No, the conditions I presented are the only conditions that I have seen matter. Being conventionally attractive makes some women more open to flirting, but that’s a step further. Your first engagement with a woman should be almost the same as if she was a man, and should only happen in a context where a small man would feel comfortable engaging with a much larger man randomly for a moment But if you start out aggressive or in an unsafe space for the woman, it’s a Hail Mary and unlikely to succee…
/r/seduction05/08/24 05:45 PM
1

He was probably trying to mislead you because he was ashamed that he was hiring an escort, and didn’t want to tell everyone
/r/seduction05/08/24 02:09 PM
43

Two great lessons: 1) most single women are very open to a cold approach if it’s fairly natural, in a place where she doesn’t feel threatened, and you aren’t needy. 2) most single women really don’t want you to keep pushing once she deflects. It’s sometimes possible to deflect a deflection, but only if you can make her laugh. Otherwise, just wish her well and move on
/r/seduction05/08/24 01:44 PM
7

No, it’s about coming to your center, being aware and open in your feelings and body, and confident in the worth of your being, outside of any external validation.
/r/seduction04/08/24 06:58 PM
3

Just tell them that you’re not up for something serious just yet. Or, if you want to sleep with multiple peoples at once, be clear that you’re consensually non-monogamous, and go to town
/r/seduction03/08/24 09:14 PM
3

Perfect. Not go find something interesting to do next weekend, and invite her on an adventure with you
/r/seduction03/08/24 08:43 PM
1

Thanks! You’re not too bad yourself! (Ideally, you look then from head to toe while you say this, with a look of playful desire) That’s what my mom says, too That’s soooo true!
/r/seduction03/08/24 03:48 PM
1

BadGuy is trying to ruin sex clubs by flooding them with single men. The good parties tend to be more selective, and amazing. But the bad clubs are just a bunch of single guys walking around in their underwear with zombie eyes. Nobody’s getting laid except those who came with someone
/r/seduction03/08/24 05:00 AM
1

You’re delusional, in a way that provides very self-serving justifications.
/r/seduction02/08/24 03:43 PM
5

Sure. If you’re doing online, I’ve found it’s best to try to set up a coffee date quick to see if there’s real chemistry. Text chemistry is a different thing, and it’s not very related to real chemistry, in my experience. If they ask, though, you can say something like “I’m 29 — just experienced enough to know what I like, and skilled enough to get it.” Or something. Obviously, make it fit who you are. But young men are idiots, so many younger women are open to older guys. I hear what you’re say…
/r/seduction01/08/24 09:26 PM
7

Just don’t make a big deal out of your age. But don’t hesitate to play up your experience and maturity. I’d encourage you to date women over 22
/r/seduction01/08/24 07:40 PM
4

Someone with the intelligence and skill to analyze deeply, and the confidence and centeredness to relax and find good with whatever’s happening. That’s a man that not only attracts women’s attention, but takes them to bed when he wants, and has the sense and self-knowledge to pick the right woman for himself and build an incredible relationship with her.
/r/seduction30/07/24 06:57 AM
2

No, But it was more fun and less depressing
/r/seduction30/07/24 03:03 AM
2

But is he as charming as me?
/r/seduction29/07/24 01:00 AM
1

Beautiful women get more interest from aggressive men. And they have infinite options online. And they’re often treated like goddesses or royalty by normal people. So they’re often a bit reticent. But many are sick of the aggressive apples with the balls to talk with them, and think it’s silly that people are so scared of them just because they’re pretty. Just treating them like human beings — imperfect, fully tease-able, but deserving of respect — can be enough sometimes
/r/seduction28/07/24 09:33 PM
1

The key is to seek your center — it’s there in your body, and so grounding. From there, a sense of basic happiness arises. The rest is gravy
/r/seduction28/07/24 06:31 PM
1

Doesn’t work? For what, exactly? Depending on the frequency, duration, type, and skill of meditation, as well as the natural variance of any practice, meditation can be as powerful as an acid trip or great lovemaking, or as dull as study hall
/r/seduction28/07/24 04:39 AM
2

Wait longer before you have sex, and date more than one woman at a time. Then only have sex with the ones you really like. If the sex is great, and she's into you, then let those feelings fly! Ideally, there's mutual chemistry, and you both catch feelings. If not, let her go and start again
/r/seduction26/07/24 08:30 PM
3

Try meditation
/r/seduction26/07/24 07:39 PM
2

Obviously, you can say things that will positively turn her off. So avoid hot button issues, unless you can handle the heat and make it a way to flirt. But generally, check out the movie Pootie Tang. It’s ridiculous, but mostly right. Sign your kitty on the runny kine.
/r/seduction25/07/24 09:21 PM
4

I suspect this is right. But it’s interesting that it’s a mostly American phenomenon. In Southern Europe and South America, if you don’t show strong interest early, a woman won’t think you’re interested at all. Not sure why American women tend to be so catty, but it seems similar to the bullying culture of masculinity in America.
/r/seduction25/07/24 02:42 AM
2

If you can let go of comparisons and programmed cultural expectations, it can be great. Brilliant successful women are the best. And they often enjoy a strong dominant man in the bedroom, if you can appreciate her strength in the living room
/r/seduction24/07/24 01:43 AM
3

You’re coming off as needy. Try talking with everyone, men, women, old, young, etc. talk to them all the same at first. Then, if you feel a charge talking with a woman, and her eyes are dancing a bit, flirt. If she flirts back, play with her for a few minutes, then ask for her number.
/r/seduction24/07/24 12:06 AM
1

Crying is fine, even good. But women really like men to be centered and not crying over petty things like something they wanted but didn’t get.
/r/seduction23/07/24 02:39 AM
3

Give it time. Meditate, exercise, go dancing, strengthen your friends network, find your joy in life. Date when you meet a woman you really like
/r/seduction22/07/24 09:38 PM
4

Judging by my experience, it’s way less than 1/5. Real mutual chemistry is pretty rare — it’s where you both get a little electricity and want to touch people and feel dreamy.
/r/seduction22/07/24 05:59 PM
3

The vast majority of women you meet, there won’t be mutual chemistry. You think you’re into her because she looks good or whatever, but you’re not actually into her. That’s one reason it’s so much better to meet people in real life — you can talk with lots of people and only proceed with a woman if there’s genuine mutual chemistry.
/r/seduction22/07/24 04:46 PM
7

Might be that your you and your friends are kind of assholes when you get together?
/r/seduction22/07/24 12:36 PM
3

You’re afraid. Some will reject you or you’ll discover it’s not a good match for you. Some you might really like each other, and then you’ll need to figure out how to be centered and enjoy a deeper relationship. Go for it
/r/seduction20/07/24 04:54 PM
2

Exactly — make it about meeting petite and getting to know them and yourself with them. Find ways to enjoy yourself, even if the person is a bit irritating. Make it fun. Most people you talk to won’t become friends, let alone dear friends. Most women you engage with won’t become friends or lovers, let alone serious, long-term girlfriends. So appreciate what’s happening. It’s not a job that you’re doing (dating) just to earn money (sex or relationships). It’s going to a dinner party to enjoy the …
/r/seduction20/07/24 04:19 PM
3

It’s hard, it’s hard, it’s hard, and then at a certain point you stop caring about the outcome, and you start to really appreciate the process and enjoy the spontaneity of getting to know someone and seeing where it goes. Then it becomes much more fun
/r/seduction20/07/24 03:56 PM
3

Relax. People can feel the tension underneath. It’s about finding someone that you have mutual chemistry with, who makes you feel electric in your skin and Champagne bubbles in your heart. Instead you’re just looking to check the girlfriend box
/r/seduction19/07/24 01:16 PM
6

Lesson learned, hopefully. Fortune favors the bold. Don’t bother her for a month, or so
/r/seduction18/07/24 05:30 PM
1

Depends on how you feel about it. Is it too much? Then it’s too much, and you should talk to her about it. Are you enjoying it? Then enjoy it
/r/seduction16/07/24 01:19 AM
1

Unless you look like a model, you should be wholly focused on meeting women in the real world. And even if you look like a model, that’s what you should do. It’s so much easier, better, and more fun
/r/seduction15/07/24 11:13 AM
8

Sounds like you’re an unusual attractive guy, with lots of beautiful woven interested in you. No one likes to be rejected, and beautiful women are really not used to it. When they give you a look that holds for 1/4 seconds longer than needed, you’re good. A second caught eye is quite decisive. If you want to check, try repeatedly looking at someone behind the woman you’re interested in. If she looks behind her, you know she’s trying to figure out what other woman you’re more interested in than h…
/r/seduction14/07/24 03:07 PM
102

More practice flirting with those women. Maybe there’s real mutual chemistry — then get the numbers and go
/r/seduction11/07/24 11:18 AM
1

Try the gentle vase breathing technique. It’s quite grounding and centering, especially for times when the “energies” or whatever are wiggling in your belly and racing up to your head. https://youtu.be/9vVg-hOvl5I?si=fQ2wic4Iz3MKr6z7
/r/seduction10/07/24 09:06 AM
0

Look at Ronaldo — he’s the star, he practices like a magic, and he’s handsome. When he misses a penalty kick, he cries for a minute. Then he’s right back playing his hardest for the team. That’s the kind of vulnerability a woman wants — strong, centered, kind. They want a man who’s strong enough that he can be open with his feelings, and also take care of their woman
/r/seduction09/07/24 01:53 PM
3

Totally right. There’s an uncertain period at the beginning, then you’re sorted into in or out. If you’re in, the trick is to stay centered enough that you don’t start acting like a thirsty idiot and turn her off. If you’re out, the only thing to do is to go start dating other women.
/r/seduction09/07/24 01:38 PM
-1

I’d probably run off your personality, and leave the job as a surprise, unless you’re looking for a professional marriage
/r/seduction07/07/24 06:40 PM
6

So you just cum in women and buy them the morning after pill?!? You’re like the poster boy for the reason women are wary of men. Emergency contraception is hard on women’s bodies, and often makes them quite sick. Pulling out is easy and free Plus, as it sounds like you’re acting from selfish motives, alone, there’s no obligation for a woman to take your $50 pill, but there will be an obligation to pay child support.
/r/seduction07/07/24 04:19 PM
2

While I’d disagree about sex with condoms, I hope that 1) you’re getting STI tests every quarter or so, and 2) you’re always pulling out. There’s no way for a woman to get pregnant without a man coming in her pussy. And these days, with a fundamentalist Supreme Court, she may be trapped
/r/seduction07/07/24 03:53 PM
12

It’s a fairly high status job, like being an electrical engineer. Good money and smart people. But it carries with it a stigma similar to that of the electrical engineer — poor social skills, poor style, and questionable hygiene. Might get matches, but for the wrong reasons. On top of that, many software engineers are Chinese or Indian, and there’s a perception that those cultures are typically chauvinist and the men expect to be coddled.
/r/seduction07/07/24 02:48 PM
12

People don’t know what they want, and if they do they’re often hesitant to say. Approach patiently and indirectly
/r/seduction05/07/24 02:19 PM
0

Why are you so set against a relationship?
/r/seduction05/07/24 10:26 AM
1

Absolutely. Cheating is often more about freshness and feelings of inadequacy or lack within the cheater than it is a reflection on their partner.
/r/seduction04/07/24 11:22 PM
1

Kizomba! Yes
/r/seduction03/07/24 10:21 AM
2

I guess, maybe stop expecting dates to end in sex? Try to enjoy yourself during a date. That’s what you should focus on. Stay centered in your body and be present with your desire and feelings. Listen more than talk, but flirt and let the cock/erotic energy move openly. If she’s feeling it, you’ll know. If she’s not, that’s fine, too. Find other things to enjoy about the date, and don’t try to pretend a mediocre connection is something great. Just move on with joy
/r/seduction02/07/24 07:52 PM
7

When I was 19, a 50 year old family friend took me to the side, and said, “There was an old bull and a young bull on top of a hill. Down below was a pasture ripe with lovely cows. “The young bull said to the old bull, ‘let’s run down there and fuck one of those cows!’ “The old bull responded, ‘let’s walk down there and fuck them all.’” Have patience, be kind, gain justified trust. Flirt with them all, even the ones you’re not so interested in. Then ask out the one you have the first, most dynami…
/r/seduction02/07/24 06:00 PM
13

I agree — clubs and hot parties are great places for a night or week of fun, but usually the women are in transition or otherwise not ready for a real relationship
/r/seduction01/07/24 03:39 PM
1

Don’t sweat it. She was probably offended that you scheduled something so far out
/r/seduction27/06/24 05:10 PM
2

I live in NYC, which is way more full of millionaires. If you insist on dating gold- diggers, don’t complain that it costs your all your gold.
/r/seduction26/06/24 12:44 PM
2

Jesus! Why spend so much in every date? The first date is just a chemistry check — meet for coffee or a drink. That should eliminate 9/10 of the non-matches. Of the women you actually really like, maybe 1/20 are such a great match that they deserve serious, multi- year commitment. But 3-6 months is pretty typical. So no need to keep saying so frequently. Also, if you meet women in real life, first, you have much better odds that there’s mutual chemistry
/r/seduction26/06/24 12:34 PM
0

I disagree, sorry if. Men need to be better centered and less anxious, or stuck in their heads. But there also need to start taking risks and feeling the wind in their hair. Nothing women love more than an adventure, and who better to take them than a seasoned adventurer. Plus, it’s just a richer life
/r/seduction26/06/24 12:36 AM
2

Half true. Vulnerability is great, but women really get turned off by guys who are not centered. In other words, sort your shit out, get to a place where you’re centered and basically happy regardless of the circumstances. Then, when you meet a woman, you can be very honest about the difficulties you’ve had and it will increase intimacy and trust
/r/seduction20/06/24 02:44 PM
6

When I meet a woman and we have strong mutual chemistry, I stop with the games after a few dates. Never caused me any problems
/r/seduction14/06/24 04:09 PM
1

I saw a porn video with a m->f Tg star, and at least judging from the outside, the only thing about her vagina that was noticeable was that it was weirdly perfect, like a teenage boy’s dream of a pussy
/r/seduction09/06/24 11:03 PM
2

I can’t speak to everything you’ve said, but my understanding was that the vagina in m->f Tg people was the penis turned inside out. So there should be plenty of sensation, just no clitorus
/r/seduction09/06/24 11:01 PM
5

Take her on adventures, take care of her (such is very different from doing whatever she wants), and be always seducing and always responsive. Then fuck her so good. But just know that what works right now won’t always work. So be playful and creative over time, and don’t build resentment about inevitable change
/r/seduction09/06/24 06:19 PM
1

You give far too much credit to strategy and manipulation. The vast majority of people (especially men) are just getting kicked around by their emotional reactions and habitual thought/behavior patterns, and then make up ideas to try to justify.
/r/seduction07/06/24 05:05 PM
16

She’s not playing with you, but she is unhappy and emotionally unstable and kind of testing you to make you jealous or see if you’re centered and secure. If you date her, you’ll need to gently take her in hand. I always recommend that people try to work to a place of basic happiness before engaging in a serious relationship. And seek partners who are also basically happy
/r/seduction07/06/24 02:24 PM
10

Excellent. Compliment everyone (except maybe girls under 20), and do it genuinely. The best practice is with men. Seriously. And the best compliments are those regarding something that the person has power over. So complimenting someone’s freckles or calves is likely to irritate them. But complimenting their jacket, or the way they do something, makes people feel great. Always only genuine Honestly, going around looking for things that you appreciate any people is not only a great way to get com…
/r/seduction07/06/24 01:33 AM
1

This is not really true
/r/seduction07/06/24 12:00 AM
3

Lean to be comfortable with silence. If there’s a natural gap, and you’re not curious about something, then let the silence be. Nothing needs to fill the silence. That would probably be a great time to tell her to have a wonderful day, and walk away. But if you’re sitting for a meal or whatever, then just let it be. Either she discovers something to say/ask, or you do, or you can be silent together for a bit. Silence is golden, as long as you’re not aching and squirming under the weight of the s…
/r/seduction06/06/24 12:04 PM
7

While I largely agree with this, chasing can be ended in as a form of flirtatious play. If you’re having fun playing, don’t worry about it. If you’re strategizing and worrying, then it’s time to move on
/r/seduction04/06/24 08:05 PM
1

Yeah, work out 5 days/week and cut the calories. You don’t need to be some muscle-dude, but show care and responsibility, even some pride, in your body and appearance. You’ll feel better and look better, and everything is more fun. And women definitely notice
/r/seduction04/06/24 07:46 PM
26

This isn’t difficult, dude. Mutual chemistry means BOTH parties are feeling butterflies and electricity and laughing easy, etc. If someone feels hot toward you, and it’s not reciprocated, use that as an opportunity to feel what it’s like to be desired and not want it. It can teach you a lot about the experience of the women that you desire but who don’t desire you back. Then treat those women with the care and respect you would have liked to have received from girls who you had an unreciprocated…
/r/seduction04/06/24 03:52 PM
2

It does not work the way you expect. Your expectations are common among those viewing western sex-positive culture from a much more conservative standpoint. But those expectations will lead you to behave in a way that Is almost universally disliked, if you don’t learn. So congratulations for coming here and asking! Western women will sometimes have sex without knowing someone very well. But it’s fairly rare. Most women are quite particular. And they have a lot of options, especially the beautifu…
/r/seduction03/06/24 11:04 PM
4

This is absolutely right. So much of the trouble of American men is that most of the good ones are totally stuck in their heads, trying to figure out how to get what they want without offending anyone. Instead, come back to experience. Pay attention to her and yourself, and show your desire to move you while being sensitive to her responses. Don’t worry about offending. Don’t even worry about hurting her — when you fall in love, you’ll always end up getting hurt, and that’s ok. But don’t harm an…
/r/seduction03/06/24 01:59 PM
2

That’s about 2/3 true. Which is why working out, taking care of your hygiene, and developing a personally fitting style is important. But women are much less interested in looks than guys are. And if you get them stuck in their heads deliberating, they’re not interested
/r/seduction01/06/24 08:12 PM
0

Don’t ask. Engage responsively and be prepared to be humble, apologize genuinely, and learn how you can do better next time. https://youtu.be/ulrxrM8Sldk?si=NwZRk54Tbi6pkdQu
/r/seduction01/06/24 07:39 PM
6

Stop ranking women by looks, as though you access the hive-mind of male desire when you encounter a woman. Just be with people, and observe when you’re finding yourself aroused or excited to be closer to someone, and then observe them and be responsive
/r/seduction31/05/24 03:29 PM
1

I’ll show you the direct path to unshakable confidence. If you predicate the value of your being on any external factor, such as the approval of others or the money in your bank account, etc., then you will always find yourself going up and down, feeling good and bad, because those factors are always changing and only a little under your control. So break out of that. Shed it like an old skin. Look at what you desire, outside of any external approval. Become skillful at pursuing what you want. D…
/r/seduction31/05/24 01:08 AM
1

Sounds like a girl with some trauma and/or poor mental health. She may be promiscuous as a way to seek affection and a sense of belonging, but it’s probably not because she enjoys sex (not that she doesn’t ever enjoy sex, But that she’s likely doing it for the guys, not herself). She could probably use some support from someone who isn’t just trying to use her. if you want to help her you should start by absolutely deciding that you will not ever sleep with her. You’ll just be a friend, and try …
/r/seduction29/05/24 08:11 PM
3

Vulnerable is a huge turn on for women — it shows supple strength. Insecurity, however, is among the worst turn-offs
/r/seduction29/05/24 05:43 PM
1

Then stop doing it. Or at least learn the signs that a woman is falling for you and, if you have no intention of escalating, sit them down for a hard conversation before they go further. Then, maybe, consider exploring nonmonogamy
/r/seduction29/05/24 05:41 PM
6

Sounds like you’re not having trouble meeting women, or getting dates, you’re having trouble with relationships. There are infinite reasons why that might be, but it’s worth noting that relationships are much more complicated than seduction. Still, from your description, it sounds like you have an avoidant attachment style, so you might want to bring awareness to that. What are you afraid of, when it comes to women? Why? If you open your heart, and trust deeply, your heart may indeed get broken.…
/r/seduction29/05/24 11:59 AM
1

It’s not about words. Take this as an opportunity to practice the most important thing — centered confidence and responsive play. If you’ve got the riz for it, and the willingness to look foolish with grace, then take her dancing
/r/seduction27/05/24 07:56 PM
2

Patience. A few weeks is a moment.
/r/seduction27/05/24 03:07 PM
2

At night, most women are on guard for sleazy dudes just looking for a ONS.
/r/seduction25/05/24 12:17 PM
2

That certainly hasn’t been my experience. But I guess it depends on how you play the games. Some playful gamesmanship is skillful seduction. But it can easily turn into instrumental manipulation
/r/seduction24/05/24 10:36 PM
2

I disagree. Playing women shows a certain lack of confidence, but it’s common since so many American women seem to be conditioned to dismiss men who don’t play the game according to the current expectations.
/r/seduction24/05/24 09:54 PM
2

This is the most accurate answer
/r/seduction24/05/24 08:32 PM
1

Sometimes guys play women BECAUSE they like them. Don’t assume anything, either way, until you’ve asked.
/r/seduction24/05/24 08:19 PM
0

Who knows? Patience and ease are essential. But, if you run into a woman with that kind of chemistry in the future, and you feel similarly toward her, you need to make your desire clear. Sounds like she opened herself completely, told you how kind you were, but then you didn’t move forward and show her that you were a man who could also reach out and take what he wanted
/r/seduction24/05/24 01:27 PM
3

Indeed, there’s lots of kinds of attention that are very uncomfortable, or even frightening, especially for women
/r/seduction23/05/24 01:02 PM
18

Yes, it definitely exists. It's easiest to find in a context that's fundamentally limited such as when one of you will be moving away in a few months
/r/seduction22/05/24 01:32 PM
77

Everyone likes attention from the opposite sex. You’re learning to be desirable at first glance, and many women will respond to that. Enjoy it, but release the grasping into it
/r/seduction22/05/24 12:55 PM
1

Make your life an adventure, then invite women to join you. Don’t worry too much about trouble with women — most 17 yr old guys look and act like they’re still in the pupae stage. Find and develop your passions, exercise your body, learn to center your mind and ground yourself in joy. Women so become abundant as you mature
/r/seduction21/05/24 03:01 PM
1

Don’t sweat it. Have fun, don’t take it too seriously at the beginning, and explore together.
/r/seduction20/05/24 09:13 PM
1

You're moving at the right speed, but your imagination is running way too fast. Focus on doing your stuff, and building a roaring bonfire from the spark you've got right now. The feelings you're having are a sign that you should be allowing your heart to open to her, but it's absolutely essential that you stay centered and focused on taking care of yourself in the process.
/r/seduction20/05/24 03:35 PM
2

Those are two sides of the same coin. Be bold, dominant, centered, and go after what you want. And part of that is knowing who you are and what you want. And what you want is someone who really turns you on, and who you laugh with and go on amazing adventures with and can also manage life together with. That's what women want, too. And part of being bold and centered is accepting that things are the way they are, without trying to change them to become different. If you keep pursuing someone who…
/r/seduction20/05/24 03:29 PM
1

They probably smell your thirsty fetishization and are not especially interested. Approach white women like most other women -- warmth, humor, playfulness and a sense of adventure are all winners. Add a sensual voice and body-language, good habits, and some ambition, and you'll have your pick. But it's essential that you view them as individuals, and look to how they're responding as individuals. Fruitless and frustrating (and creepy) to try to seduce a woman who has given you a clear no, or eve…
/r/seduction20/05/24 03:02 PM
4

Why do you feel gross and guilty?
/r/seduction19/05/24 04:51 PM
2

Right. A bit like “a play” in soccer or football or basketball — you make a plan, practice the different parts, then that plan and practice helps orient and gently guide you as you engage with the spontaneous chaos/delight of the actual world and actual people.
/r/seduction19/05/24 01:47 PM
3

Nah, it’s not about formulas, it’s about managing spontaneity with aplomb
/r/seduction19/05/24 01:16 AM
3

Exactly. Nothings going to happen, and knowing that relieves the pressure.
/r/seduction15/05/24 10:16 PM
3

You had a great night. She’s definitely into you, and she likes that you’re your own person. Keep being yourself, hold your center, and don’t blow it by becoming too thirsty or an asshole.
/r/seduction13/05/24 01:26 PM
1

Why did you wait for her? Take the lead, man. I’d go do something fun with friends and text to ask if she wants to join. Or, if that’s not possible, text her now with “hey, it’s Friday night, should I send the helicopter to pick you up?” Or something. Have fun with it
/r/seduction10/05/24 09:13 PM
19

She found you hot and wanted to enjoy the moment being hot with you! Appreciate it and let it go. You also might not have kissed her very well. Many men are too aggressive in their kissing -- mashing mouths and using a lot of tongue are generally turn-offs for women, at least before they're deeply infused with eros. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulrxrM8Sldk&t
/r/seduction10/05/24 05:42 PM
1

I’ve always dated multiple women at a time, until I settle down with one. That’s the way to do it, honestly. What’s the problem?
/r/seduction09/05/24 04:45 PM
2

I think 27-28 is prime for women, and around 35 for men. But yeah, young women are flaky, until they’re not
/r/seduction09/05/24 03:07 PM
1

Focusing on the now. Not only do women love that when you’re flirting with them, but they love it even more in bed. One of the best practices you can learn — relax into the spontaneity of the present
/r/seduction09/05/24 01:30 AM
3

Sure. You’re not talking about the top 20%, or even the top 2%. You’re talking about the top 0.002%. I say that with confidence because I live in NYC and still NEVER see guys like that. On top of it, this guys sounds like he was centered and warm and confident — he came up to the round table and acted with magnanimity. In general, looks are far less important than guys think. But they certainly help, and if a guy is mind-numbing hot, and self-assured, he’s going to have women throwing themselves…
/r/seduction08/05/24 05:57 PM
7

Good job! Now go get rejected 20 more times
/r/seduction08/05/24 11:48 AM
3

Absolutely. The check-list will lead you astray. But there’s mutual respect and enjoyment and eros, i.e., you two have mutual chemistry, and her heart is soft for you, than go for it
/r/seduction07/05/24 01:42 PM
3

Women are like cats. You need to be confident enough to approach them directly, and skilled enough to approach them from the side.
/r/seduction06/05/24 05:27 PM
13

The only way to get over it is to gather the courage and go talk to lots of women, flirt with the ones you like, and get brushed off over and over and over, while also reflecting a bit and not being attached to any identity or practice. Just go enjoy yourself with women, and accept that it's ok to show your sexual interest to them through subtle cues. Drop the worrying and get out of your head and into your heart and senses.
/r/seduction22/04/24 03:45 PM
1

Break the shame. But first, reflect on it. It's coming from some ideology that's hardened and isn't letting you be free to be yourself. Be conscientious about safe sex and doing harm to others, and then enjoy. Sometimes, however, after a very hot night, especially if she's now gone, we feel lonely or yearn for a deeper connection. That's fine. There's nothing wrong with exploring joyfully with someone who's on the same page. It's one of the greatest adventures available to humans. But also be at…
/r/seduction22/04/24 03:31 PM
4

I'm picky, and greatly prefer relationships with hot, brilliant women where there's deep connection and tremendous chemistry. That's hard to find. And it took me a while of exploration to figure that out. So I'm more of a catch-and-release kind of seducer. Seduction allows you to learn about yourself and what really turns you on and what really matters for you in a relationship. It gives you understanding and freedom. But learning to be excellent in bed, and excellent in relationships are both m…
/r/seduction22/04/24 03:27 PM
-2

Go with two. “Hey, you know I think you’re smoking, and we have a lot of fun together. But I’m dating other women, and you have a serious boyfriend, so let’s just Leo things strictly on the friends level.” Don’t pick up girls with serious boyfriends. The best case is that you manage to get them to break up, but your relationship will never last long
/r/seduction19/04/24 06:23 PM
2

Do this meditation every day for a month. Get in some anaerobic exercise a few days a week. You’ll be transformed, promise https://insig.ht/4sx0n05pVIb
/r/seduction19/04/24 02:40 PM
1

Sounds like you’ve got a pretty good candidate for causes — your apartment was dirty, and maybe didn’t show much confidence in your style. That’s something that can be fun to work on — developing one’s own style. It also seems possible that she just got spooked by being alone with some rando, even if she was hot for you. Or that she realized you were more intoxicated than she’d thought. But I want to point out that her ghosting is really not disrespectful. She’s in your home, despite only knowin…
/r/seduction19/04/24 01:48 PM
3

There’s no height requirement for meeting a great woman, either. I know because I have numerous guy friends varying from 5’3” to 5”7’, I.e., short, and they all have wonderful long time girlfriends or wives. “Drop it” means recognize that it’s fake and harming you, and notice when it’s circling in your mind, and let it go rather than feeding it with emotion and extra evidence gathering. I don’t understand the rest of your argument, but I have no problem with women and would be happy to see both …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 10:53 PM
2

No, But many poor people could certainly accomplish a great deal more, and make far more money, if they had a better attitude. It’s complicated because these men aren’t coming up with their defeatist ideology on their own — there’s a whole network of men supporting themselves in their belief that the world is set against them and dating is basically impossible. We don’t have power over what people say online, but we have some power over our own beliefs. And these defeatist beliefs are both harmf…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 10:12 PM
4

I really think it’s because of the self-defeating attitude that you’re bringing to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 09:41 PM
6

She had a bit of a wild night, and doesn’t feel like making more of it than that. She’s not looking for something more serious right now, certainly not with you. Enjoy it for what it was, and let it go. There’s no bigger meaning
/r/seduction17/04/24 09:20 PM
3

Maybe the problem is with America’s increasingly cartoonish norms of masculinity? I mean, American femininity is messed up, too. But if so many women would prefer to be alone than deal with an American man, it seems like the problem is American men. They could start by getting out of their heads and just paying real attention to people without judgment or some effort to manipulate them
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 09:14 PM
1

This guy fucks
/r/seduction17/04/24 09:08 PM
1

Be friendly, get to know everyone, including the women you’re attracted to. Take your time, as most people will come back. Got just a touch with with you like, but restrain yourself, even if she flirts back a bit. Always stop beforeshe’s gotten tired of annoyed by talking with you. Like fruit on trees, you’re slowly ripening these connections. Once the connection is ripe, you can ask the women or out or try to keep the interest while you date other women.
/r/seduction17/04/24 08:44 PM
1

What outcome is that?
/r/seduction16/04/24 10:34 AM
1

Relax, find someone you really have a lot in common with, and great mutual chemistry. Work on being an amazing lover and partner. Enjoy
/r/seduction16/04/24 01:08 AM
1

Does your girlfriend know you’re seducing other girls?
/r/seduction16/04/24 01:05 AM
1

Onward!
/r/seduction16/04/24 12:53 AM
1

“I honestly have no idea. If we’ve got chemistry, anything’s possible”
/r/seduction16/04/24 12:44 AM
2

Why not seek out a sex worker to gain experience. Be honest with her about being a virgin, as part of the vetting process. That’s a venerable tradition in Southern Europe, and there’s nowhere that produces more consistently seductive men
/r/seduction15/04/24 11:08 PM
1

That’s what I expected, and it changes nothing about my advice
/r/seduction15/04/24 10:40 PM
8

"Great question! Why don't we grab a coffee and discuss"
/r/seduction15/04/24 05:23 PM
2

That stuff is all made up, so don't worry about categorizing yourself unless it's helpful, somehow. But it does sound like you could use to relax and get more comfortable with yourself and the world. I'd suggest trying some meditation. Here's a great place to start -- do this every day for a month, and your life will be radically changed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdVpd-Ya7Dk
/r/seduction15/04/24 04:49 PM
0

So when you're having a conversation with your boss or your friends, you don't maintain eye contact for more than a couple seconds at a time?
/r/seduction15/04/24 04:35 PM
1

Accept that you probably won't have mutual chemistry. But there's no way to know but to go talk with her. Next time you see her in the library or coffee-shop, or somewhere where she's sitting still, make eye contact. If she holds your eyes for a moment, even just a 1/2 second pause, especially if she also has a micro-expression of any kind, then go talk with her about some subject of potentially mutual interest. Have fun, be playful and centered. She will almost certainly not be interested. But …
/r/seduction15/04/24 03:57 PM
0

You're wondering whether you should do a bunch of things exclusively because there's women there and you might get lucky with one. That's kind of the definition of thirsty neediness. Keep exploring places YOU enjoy. Keep exploring your desires and joy. Center yourself in your own being, not in some prospective woman who you believe will somehow make you happy. That's the source of true self-confidence, and it's both unshakeable and very attractive to women. Given how much you're in your head, I …
/r/seduction15/04/24 03:42 PM
1

Sounds like she likes you. Drop the kino stuff, and just wait for a point at which it feels semi-natural. Maybe at the end of the next day? https://youtu.be/ulrxrM8Sldk?si=ucIM_o2Pmq9-LY29
/r/seduction15/04/24 02:26 PM
4

It’s not wrong, but women can smell thirsty neediness, and it’s like a repellent.
/r/seduction15/04/24 02:10 PM
1

It’s all about neighborhoods. At night, go dancing, not to bars. If you prefer conversation, try coffee shops
/r/seduction13/04/24 11:56 PM
1

I’ve found the tantric path of acceptance of, even surrender to, reality to be very helpful. What’s happening is true, and the rest is just fantasy. Maybe check out Tantric Quest, which is pretty great and a fun read. Or Existential Kink, if you have the discernment to sort the bogus metaphysics out from the good stuff.
/r/seduction13/04/24 11:17 PM
2

I suspect it’s a healthy, evolved response. Women are more attracted to guys who aren’t needy and thirsty
/r/seduction13/04/24 11:07 PM
2

Take some time to yourself. Meditate, reflect, exercise, center yourself.
/r/seduction13/04/24 10:57 PM
1

Women don’t really want you all shaved. I use an epilator on the shaft, and a beard trimmer on the rest.
/r/seduction13/04/24 10:55 PM
20

Perfect — respect, responsiveness, authentic expression, some bravery and skill, and the right woman. So happy for you!
/r/seduction13/04/24 07:02 PM
-5

This is the gold standard: https://youtu.be/SKT1ER4EF-E?si=xyln5-pcJKPUOv7X
/r/seduction13/04/24 04:59 PM
1

Talk about subjects of genuine mutual interest. That’s what the initial conversation is seeking out. If you can’t find subjects of genuine mutual interest, then you are not a good match, there is not chemistry, and you should go talk to someone else.
/r/seduction13/04/24 03:12 PM
1

Maybe, but I have yet to meet that woman. Looks will get her to come to the door, but it won’t get you in the door
/r/seduction12/04/24 08:56 PM
1

No, I’m just referring to BEFORE you talk to a woman. Once you talk to her, signs of interest are usually flirting or having a spark in her eye. But waitresses flirt for money, so take it with a grain of salt in that case
/r/seduction12/04/24 08:55 PM
1

Do YOU feel like there’s a connection? I’m rarely surprised if I get rejected after a date, because it’s clear there’s not mutual chemistry.
/r/seduction12/04/24 08:21 PM
0

Generally, no. Unless they have reason to be aware of your reputation, women usually don’t really know if they’re attracted to you until you start talking to them. But if your eyes meet, and they hold your eyes for more than about half a second, that usually means they’re attracted enough to you that they won’t automatically turn you down. You just need to get used to being rejected.
/r/seduction12/04/24 06:57 PM
0

Either invite her for coffee, or for something more fun and adventurous than a drink at the bar.
/r/seduction12/04/24 06:46 PM
0

The way to know who you can attract is to talk to them, flirt a bit, and see if their eyes sparkle or they flirt back. If they do, they're attracted to you, and you can ask them on a coffee date. If they don't, then they're not likely to be attracted to you, and you should assume that they will never become attracted to you. It's that simple
/r/seduction12/04/24 06:12 PM
7

“I have girls that will occasionally stare at me and talk to me, act interested, etc but then other times I can accidentally look at a girl and they’ll look away.” That is literally the way it is for the handsomest, most famous men on earth. It’s mostly just a matter of proportions. Sounds like they’re plenty interested in you. By the way, women will think a very handsome man is a creep, if they stare. If she holds your eyes for more than about half a second, and there’s intent, then that usuall…
/r/seduction12/04/24 04:38 PM
1

It’s all about leading with clarity of desire, but remaining highly responsive. Then play. Play with in and out, close and further, hot and cold. Don’t do it like an asshole, do it like you’re children playing a game together. https://youtu.be/ulrxrM8Sldk?si=AJV6EB51XuNNJ1JX
/r/seduction12/04/24 02:15 PM
2

You sound like you’re heading for sorrow, at best. Center yourself, and relax attachment to phenomena. No one can make you happy or unhappy, except your own mind.
/r/seduction11/04/24 01:32 PM
2

I’m a romantic in the restaurant, and a tiger in the bedroom. It took me until my mid twenties to embrace the primal side of myself. It was a kind of shadow work to integrate my desire, and it’s been incredibly rewarding. Sounds like your shadow is the caring, sensual boy who allows himself to be vulnerable with women. Get to know that guy, and give him space to be himself — you’ll be a better partner and a better lover and a better friend to women
/r/seduction11/04/24 11:20 AM
3

You can totally recover from this! Give yourself some time, work out and meditate for a few months or until you’re ready, then start going out there and talking to women. If there’s mutual chemistry, get her number and take her to coffee. Do that with a few women, keeping things light until you meet someone you really like who really likes you. You may look back at this women as someone you once loved, or even still love, but whose central role in your life is happily and completely over.
/r/seduction11/04/24 03:54 AM
3

I have many female friends who would receive very high ratings on the pictures, if they were foolish enough to post them somewhere. I do not want to sleep with (almost) any of them. I’m just not that attracted to them, though we’re good friends so I suppose we could have a good compassionate relationship. But I want a hot erotic relationship that also includes a deep friendship dimension. Seems to me that, if you think you would have sex with any woman you’d be friends with, that means you’re no…
/r/seduction11/04/24 12:13 AM
-1

Relax, flirt with her a bit. If she flirts back, ask for her number and meet for coffee or something nonchalant. If she doesn’t flirt back, let her go and find someone that you’ve got mutual chemistry with.
/r/seduction10/04/24 09:01 PM
1

Start by being kind, not nice. That is to say, help people because you want to see them with less pain and more joy, not because of some social obligation or calculated return on investment Then, start practicing expressing your desire. If you’re interested in a woman, don’t hide it. Flirt and show her you want her (but not with outright sex talk, etc. boundary-testing subtlety is seductive). It’s essential to always have her consent. But rather than asking for consent all the time, which many w…
/r/seduction10/04/24 07:28 PM
13

Hey, if you recognize that seduction and flirting need to continue throughout the entire relationship, until you're ready to break up, then you're already way ahead of the pack.
/r/seduction09/04/24 03:34 PM
4

You'll draw more attention, because it's less common and still a bit taboo. People judge things as attractive or aversive, good or bad, whatever, CONSTANTLY. So you'll have some people judging you harshly. So what? Take the judgements and your doubts and self-consciousness and integrate them. Play with your discomfort with the racial dynamic by making it explicit and exploring the taboo and your own discomfort. Have some fun with it. Next time you get a nasty look while you're holding hands with…
/r/seduction09/04/24 03:29 PM
10

VERY HARD no. Women are always afraid that a guy who gets rejected will get angry and lash out at her, or get obsessed and stalk her, or worse. Because it happens all the time. Be a gentleman, treat her as a friend, and look for love elsewhere. If you treat her well, she’ll give you cred with the other women in the office
/r/seduction08/04/24 11:40 PM
5

Of course I have. Just never a hoe.
/r/seduction08/04/24 04:50 PM
7

I’ve never met a “hoe.” I’ve met women who love sex more, and those who love sex less. I’ve met more and less confident women, more and less afraid women, more and less centered and happy women. The women who post lots of pictures of perfect, happy, stable couples and etc, are often the most unhappy and unstable. They’re more likely to take more extreme risks to try to find some way to change things. Treat them with kindness
/r/seduction08/04/24 11:42 AM
22

No, you don’t need to be loaded to date a beautiful, brilliant woman. But you’ll need to have something she likes a lot — great sense of humor for her, or you’re brilliant or make amazing art or are just the most fun guy wherever you go, etc. Gorgeous women don’t want money, they want to be happy. And if she’s from a third world country, she’ll be more interested in your money because she and her family likely come from a situation where money is a very real issue, in a way you’ll likely never u…
/r/seduction08/04/24 11:35 AM
1

If you knew her from when you were young, you’ll run into her at dinner point. Go for it then, if it’s viable. Drop the texting, it’s over
/r/seduction07/04/24 09:22 PM
4

It’s only recently weird. And almost all women vastly prefer it over OLD. Just be attentive to her, and take the hint if she’s not feeling it after a minute
/r/seduction06/04/24 06:51 PM
1

Of course you should talk to her! I'd suggest that you offer to go visit her, next time. Or the two of you meet somewhere and travel together. It sounds like you've already talked about how much you each liked each other from the beginning. What's the hesitation?
/r/seduction02/04/24 04:12 PM
2

Exactly. It’s an adventure that you’re having together. Go at her pace, without being pushy. But don’t pretend to be something you’re not — you’re hot for her, and that’s great. If she’s no longer hot for you, that’s ok, too. You’re ultimately looking for someone with whom you have persistent mutual chemistry, and a lot of fun.
/r/seduction01/04/24 08:03 PM
190

Relax, assure her that you care for her and are interested in who she is. Stop the pushing and the going further, and just be present with her, and a little spicy. Ask her about her fears, and listen without judging or shaming.
/r/seduction01/04/24 07:10 PM
1

Totally agree, though in prefer something like: “Of course you do. And he’s a lucky man.”
/r/seduction30/03/24 05:28 PM
12

Go start dating other women
/r/seduction26/03/24 08:07 PM
4

Massages, flowers, spicy physical affection with regularity, clean sheets, a humidifier that projects essential oils, for scent. But the key thing is learning to make her really come. You need to get her into present, sense experience, and out of her planning and worries. Then worship her pussy with your hands and mouth. Once you penetrate her, if you’re close to coming by she’s still enjoying herself, just slow down and rest inside her. Look in her eyes. Or pull out and touch her or spank her o…
/r/seduction26/03/24 06:38 PM
1

Judging by this little community, the seduction community is way healthier than it used to be. It can be super hot to instrumentalize someone during sex, sometimes, if everybody’s into that sort of thing. But the old pick-up artists really tended to advocate for instrumentalization of both oneself and the obscure object of desire. Not at all satisfying, and often harmful for everyone involved
/r/seduction26/03/24 12:14 PM
2

I love modern women
/r/seduction14/03/24 09:18 PM
23

This is not an effective clustering of men into two types. The vast majority of men are in both classes. That said, yes, we all know that women often prefer confident, centered guys who know what they want and go for it without getting stuck in their head
/r/seduction12/03/24 10:50 PM
8

People are attracted to familiar patterns, even if they don’t like them, because they are fairly predictable. But there’s also much to be said for a man who knows what he wants and reaches for it without apology. Unfortunately, some of those guys are toxic, too, but women will compromise a lot for a centered guy who knows his desire
/r/seduction12/03/24 05:42 PM
7

Yeah, overuse of porn will typically do that. Otherwise you’re probably too stressed. Learn to relax deeply. Meditation is great. Also, get a scrip for cialis, cause why not?
/r/seduction11/03/24 10:49 PM
6

Tell them that they have to stroke your cock while you’re pleasuring them. When your cock is hard, you’re a much better lover. Tell her that. Or she needs to stroke your cock after. It might also be that you’re doing it out of obligation, and people can tell whether you’re really enjoying it or just counting the seconds until you’re done. Personally, I like to have sex for hours, and will frequently be going back and forth between vaginal penetration and other forms of pleasure. It’s not about t…
/r/seduction11/03/24 10:26 PM
96

Yes. Once you’ve had sex with her, the ball is in your court. If she ghosts or rejects you, don’t take it hard, but do work on your sexual skills and attention to her pleasure
/r/seduction11/03/24 04:35 PM
1

Comparison is the thief of joy. No, really, it’s almost destined to make you miserable. Try it. Pick something that you own. Now consider it in comparison to the best of that type of thing. Really sit in that comparison, considering element by element how this other thing is better. You begin to feel like your thing is practically worthless. And you start to feel like, if you could just get your jams of that other thing, you’d REALLY have something then. But if/when you save up enough money for …
/r/seduction11/03/24 05:17 AM
1

Vulnerability is a bit tricky. Women absolutely want you to be vulnerable. But they also want you to remain deeply grounded and centered. And they rarely want to be your nursemaid. And the ones who do want to be your nursemaid will tend to trap you in a state of helplessness. Women generally want men to be vulnerable by speaking frankly about how they’re feeling and what they want. Speak from your center. Then listen from your center, absorbing everything while not getting thrown off balance. If…
/r/seduction11/03/24 05:01 AM
8

I suspect you’re blessed with more than just good looks. I’m very good looking, and all it’s ever done for me is get women to look my way and give me a first opportunity. That’s big, but far from huge. For years, it didn’t matter at all, because I was too stuck in my head most of the time to actually be present with anyone, and women would sense it immediately. Once I got out of my head and into my body and senses, I found I could still only get 1/3 women, at best. Which, sure, is amazing, but n…
/r/seduction06/03/24 06:47 PM
3

Women, like men, are curious to explore their sexuality and enjoy sexual pleasure. But they’re afraid of being harmed by men, becoming pregnant, or being slut-shamed (or murdered). So don’t lie, be kind and respectful of her curiosity, and learn to give deep sexual pleasure.
/r/seduction05/03/24 02:22 AM
-3

Excellent post
/r/seduction03/03/24 10:39 PM
3

The essential thing for many people (certainly for myself) is not how long you’ve known someone, or even how well. It’s how much chemistry we have. You can think of chemistry as a measure of how much one wants to have more and deeper experiences with the person. Sometimes, circumstances (such as the end of a vacation, or having a primary partner in nonmonogamy) result in not being able to go deeper with that person. In some cases, you can become friends with a little spice. In other cases, you n…
/r/seduction03/03/24 06:56 PM
15

There’s no reason to choose. But if you had to choose, you’d be much better off working on yourself and developing emotional insight and social networks and self- confidence, than working on looks. Looks alone will get you dates off OLD, and will get you laid occasionally by drunk girls at the end of the night.
/r/seduction03/03/24 02:32 AM
1

Relax, start meditation and exercising, if you don’t already. Look around your region, and pick out the most interesting, cool, cutting-edge group that’s happening. Join them and become part of the organizing.
/r/seduction01/03/24 10:10 PM
9

Probably you went from looking like a dude too stuck in his head to take care of his body, let alone anything else, to a guy who’s connected with his physicality and, through it, the world. There’s few things less erotic, or worse in bed, than a guy who’s stuck in his head
/r/seduction29/02/24 01:25 PM
4

This guy probably isn’t in med school, he just says that in his tinder profile. Why not just go to prostitutes? Way less gross than lying a bunch to women in order to get them to let you put your penis into the hole between their legs.
/r/seduction27/02/24 05:30 PM
4

I have zero problem with women, and a great deal of pleasure. And I don’t need to lie to them
/r/seduction23/02/24 04:29 PM
5

Yes, I’m aware that there’s a great deal of bad advice for men on the internet. I would include your advice as among that
/r/seduction23/02/24 01:05 PM
12

I’m sure this works, but it’s honestly pretty dirty. You’re basically lying to these women, over and over, because you know it will make them devoted to you. Then you use them and dump them. That’s very different from strategizing and optimizing but remaining basically honest. I generally recommend this sub for the reasons you describe — it’s full of honest and good advice for guys trying to learn to open a woman’s heart and arouse her pussy. That’s all taught to guys in many cultures while they…
/r/seduction23/02/24 12:51 PM
1

This does work, but I’m not sure it works if it’s not genuine. Also, not sure if it works with women who aren’t super hot, or much hotter than the guy. One of the most beautiful women I ever dated (she was a ringer for Angelina Jolie) got sit up by this. We went out a few times, not even sleeping together. We had amazing intellectual chemistry, and I found her physically VERY attractive. But I gradually realized that we didn’t really have erotic/romantic chemistry. So I told her we should just b…
/r/seduction21/02/24 04:02 PM
34

Looksmaxxing seems to be done almost exclusively by people with some form of pathological body dysmorphia. That said, I’m very happy about the general move towards more care in men’s aesthetics in America. American men have had, by far, the sloppiest, ugliest aesthetic standards in the world for at least 30 years or so. We look and act like spoiled toddlers. Then we wonder why women think we’re assholes and don’t want to play with us?
/r/seduction15/02/24 02:45 PM
22

If she faces you, consider taking her hand to connect. Be loose and fun. If she’s enjoying, take her other hand or her waist. Enjoy, then break it off before she gets bored or weirded out. You can come back later
/r/seduction10/02/24 04:48 PM
3

Working out a good amount, taking care of one Ms hair and beard and nails and etc, and developing a personal style of clothing, are all great for attracting women and joyful, productive practices for anyone. But looks are way less important to women than most guys think. Unfortunately, because OLD is basically just pictures and some canned text, looks are the primary criteria for OLD. So get offline
/r/seduction08/02/24 05:24 PM
1

Definitely not true
/r/seduction08/02/24 02:02 AM
36

Great thing! Women are people too! Some of them you have mutual chemistry with, and want to move forward. The only problem is when you hide the fact that you’re crushing on one of your friends. Either make her clearly aware of your desire/attraction, or cut it off.
/r/seduction02/02/24 08:56 PM
2

Absolutely! It’s all about presence and warmth and a little spice.
/r/seduction31/01/24 06:47 PM
1

That’s an excellent start. Now you need to learn to embrace and pursue your desire. Playful joking and flirting are great ways to signal your sexual interest while demonstrativo that you’re restrained enough to let her be comfortable
/r/seduction30/01/24 05:50 PM
1

Maybe take a few Qi Gong or Tai Chi classes
/r/seduction26/01/24 12:15 PM
11

Ground your energy in your Dan tien. Hold gently to that deep, grounded center as you engage. It’s best to practice a lot in normal conversations, first
/r/seduction26/01/24 01:22 AM
1

The advice is good in terms of responses, but the expectation is false. Women may be unlikely to speak frankly about their desire or, even more, its lack. But just because they’re not super responsive doesn’t mean they’ve gotten cold feet — there’s lots of possible explanations. Nevertheless, if you get all weird and pushy about it, you’ll almost always push her away
/r/seduction21/01/24 04:11 PM
3

This is terrible advice. Really, you are more than physically attractive enough to attract amazing women. Sure, gaining a bit of weight might be good, and working on your style to find what works for you. But mostly you just need to dig into yourself and find out who you are and what you really want and what’s really true. Talk to people, especially beautiful women. Maybe take up meditation and read/practice Urban Tantra. It’s all learning, so don’t take anything too seriously. You’ll gain confi…
/r/seduction13/01/24 02:53 PM
3

This is like 80% of it. Nice summary
/r/seduction26/12/23 03:17 PM
12

Anyone who's ever been pursued after saying "NO" should be well aware of how counter-productive those efforts at subsequent persuasion will be
/r/seduction18/12/23 04:36 PM
1

But someone without low desire for oranges rarely wants oranges, no matter the context. Someone with responsive desire for oranges rarely wants oranges when asked, but almost always wants oranges when you squeeze the peel near their nose. Big difference. Guys need to learn to seduce their wives ands girlfriends
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 11:16 AM
1

Then why can’t you distinguish responsive desire from low desire?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 08:26 PM
1

Nah, you’re just misunderstanding how women’s desire often works
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 10:52 AM
1

Nah, women love sex as much as men. But they don’t always have spontaneous desire the same way — they tend to become aroused when someone they like tries to seduce them. If both women have responsive desire, then there’s no spark to get things started, after a while If you’re curious about the subject of women’s desire, ignore the speculations of frustrated men, and go read the research in Come as You Are
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 04:00 PM
39

The man determines the direction, and the woman decides whether she’ll go along and determines the pace
/r/seduction17/10/23 04:14 AM
154

Absolutely. For whatever innate reason, a girl signaling that she’s pulling back usually produces a frantic and desperate response in men to try to secure her. That basically never works. On the other hand, a girl signaling that she’s excited and available often produces a response in men where they suddenly have second thoughts and want to pull back. Both of those responses have their value, but you need to see through them and get over them. The right response is more often to mirror the woman…
/r/seduction16/10/23 11:44 PM
1

50 is manic desperation. If you need practice, try 5 per day for 10 days
/r/seduction09/10/23 04:51 PM
3

What makes you so miserable that’s so insolvable?
/r/seduction08/10/23 09:53 PM
1

What’s the problem?
/r/seduction08/10/23 08:59 PM
8

Jesus man, go sort yourself out rather than finding someone to share your misery with!
/r/seduction08/10/23 08:04 PM
2

All the time. Sure, they can find SOMEONE who will have sex with them, but often not the women they want. And a guy’s looks + status are pretty much wholly unrelated to the quality of their relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 10:54 PM
2

I find it’s unnecessary to disclose that I have other simultaneous partners, in the midst of an orgy. But you do you
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 07:37 PM

Completely agree with this. Some people love it, like with any job. But it’s soul chorusing and mind- numbing work for many, many people
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 07:05 PM
0

No, no secular person ever questions whether they’re making the wrong choice to get divorced
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 06:18 PM
3

Make yourself interesting. Then find someone who's interested in you. If you're genuinely interested in them, too, then voila!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 03:56 PM
0

Yeah, if he doesn’t have the patience or skills to handle a woman on her own terms, there’s still plenty of poor women happy to exchange their favors for stability. Hopefully everyone comes out a little better
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 10:16 PM
1

Models. High heels. Etc. But if you really think many people do not find a woman’s stature to be related to her status, I’m indifferent.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 08:50 PM

Completely. It’s ready doesn’t seeing the depth of delusion of these guys. And the degree to which they cling to it!?! What’s the comfort?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 07:07 PM
1

So what did I write that you’re disputing? That there’s prestige in dating tall women?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 07:05 PM
1

Whatever
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 07:03 PM
1

Just because you believe I meant X, doesn’t mean I meant X. Try using the principle of generosity of interpretation, and you’ll find that a lot of people make a lot more sense than you used to think.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 06:57 PM
1

American masculinity and femininity are terrible. So good riddance. I love that people today can explore the gender expression that feels right for them in different contexts. At its best, it’s liberating and playful. But I agree that the outcome is far too often a reduction to a kind of homogeneous grey androgyny. That’s fine for some, but is that really an authentic expression of so many? I wish we were having more interesting discussions and experiments around what masculinity can be. I do be…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 06:53 PM
0

I didn’t say anything otherwise. It’s just slightly better than for short men. Every form of prestige is all in your head
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 06:03 PM
-2

Being quite short definitely limits your options as a man. Many women like to feel small, or protected. Hard to do that with a man of similar height. Being very tall as a woman is somewhat similarly difficult. But because there's prestige in dating tall women, they seem to have a somewhat easier time of it. That said, I'm very confident that women get aroused at a much wider variety of traits than men do. There's patterns, but there's massive variation.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 05:14 PM
2

Women have high standards because they have the power to choose their partners, now. And they end up doing most of the work of relationships, so they’re wary of jumping into one. The other big thing is really that everyone has become so online, these days, and it’s made the last couple generations rather timid and alienated from their bodies and the messy world of other human bodies
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 01:36 PM
1

Really? What crazy definition of monogamy are you using that would make your statement true for what people actually do?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 12:31 AM
0

Marriage is great, and very useful for planning, wealth creation, estates, and children. After more than 15 years, my wife and I have so much sex we have to plan no-sex nights, and usually fail. But men have to give up a lot of comfort to be able to stay seductive, and they have to keep seducing, and surprising, their wives
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 08:21 PM
3

Witness testimony isn’t perfect. It needs to be evaluated for truthfulness. Most of the false convictions that I know of have been due to prosecution knowingly hiding evidence and coercing witnesses.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 12:54 PM
5

Witness testimony is the most common form of evidence in most every case. Physical evidence is rarely conclusive or available in the ways that we think from watching TV shows
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 12:30 PM
1

Cars and computers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 11:54 AM
1

Pair bonding is natural and evolved for complex mammals. Monogamy is unnatural
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 11:15 AM
0

The issues are trauma and familiarity. But so much of women's traumatic experience involves men who are not their boyfriends -- friends, acquaintances, family, sometimes even strangers. The best people are always working to unlearn emotional and intellectual over-generalizations that close us up from the world. And most of the familiarity problems are related to the practices of her parents. If they constantly shouted at each other, for instance, she probably didn't like that but still feels odd…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 12:20 AM
2

I buy my wife clothes, all the time. She’s incredibly hot, and I love to go out with her when she’s wearing nearly nothing. Turns us both on, like crazy. I love when men get hard as she stands walks in front of them, or when we’re out dancing. The trick is to be justifiably confident enough to enjoy it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 08:42 PM
0

The percentage of women who want to be 24/7 submissive is very small. From my vague experience, I’d guess it’s less common in women than in men. Again, the problem is the binaries. Forget the nonsense indoctrination, and do what you want. Then find someone who wants that too. That’s the beauty of modernity — we’re not all trapped in some adolescent teenager’s conceptual box.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 08:34 PM
0

Sure, some women love to be submissive 24/7. And some love to dominate 24/7. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 08:13 PM
0

Plenty of women love to be submissive sluts in the bedroom. That doesn't mean they don't also want to rule the boardroom. It's entirely possible to be dominant in many ways, and also very progressive in behavior and respect. The only contradiction is in the minds of Americans, who can't seem to think outside of absurd binaries
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 08:04 PM
5

I believe that’s right. But it’s worth noting that American men are doing masculinity remarkably poorly, in general. The space of masculine performance is infinite, but Americans seem stuck between the thug and the sissy. Go to Southern Europe and pay attention. They have problems, too, particularly along assumptions of patriarchy, but there’s so much to learn
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 01:52 PM
1

“The person you love [is] not having sex with other people”, and neither are you = monogamy. But why does it matter that they’ve never had sex with other people?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 09:54 AM
1

I tell my sons — off river got dirty teeth, or long, dirty fingernails, people are going to think you’re gross and don’t take care of yourself. And they’ll be right. So there some general truths about human nature of use in the world of dating. But not so many that they should form a theory. Just go out there. Fuck around and find out. Like math, you learn it by doing it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 01:27 AM
1

I believe it’s a long way in that direction. For instance, I’d bet that pedophiles are a strict subset of the somewhat larger set of guys who really want to have sex with virgins. What’s the obsession with virgins that makes it different?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 11:46 PM
-1

As is well known, some people value money and security more highly than others. Moreover, the marginal utility of a dollar is much higher for people with $100 in the bank than for those with $1,000,000 in the bank. It turns out that women don’t generally value money that highly, or they wouldn’t be so picky in the west, where they are largely secure. But they value it highly enough when they’re otherwise very poor that they will marry a not terrible guy to secure a future without serious monetar…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 11:36 PM
-2

Wanting a virgin is gross pedo stuff. Get out of your head, and pay attention to people
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 01:48 AM
1

Women love smart men, if their intelligence gives them some power over the world. They generally do not like men who are stuck in their head, and cut off from their body and emotions and senses.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 05:32 PM
1

That hasn’t been my experience, remotely. Lots of people have care for others, particularly women
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 09:25 PM
0

Forget all these rules. Just talk to people like they're human beings, ideally about things of mutual interest. If there's chemistry, go for a date and see if you can build that further. If not, make a friend or be on your way.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 07:10 PM
2

Jesus. The idea of actual kindness is completely foreign, and then you think it's looks that make it hard to get women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 06:20 PM
3

Reality — it’s not what you think
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 04:53 PM
3

Look, it’s great to enforce boundaries. But you also need to signal to people what you want from them, if you want anything. And what you don’t want. So sure, go tell the girl you’ve got a crush on that you really like her, and that you’d be happy to do all kind of nice things for her if she gets into a relationship with you. But if she doesn’t find you attractive, you can’t spend all this energy on her. Then enforce that boundary. Or don’t tell her that, but go up to her and tell her you think …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 04:52 PM
6

Yeah, to be king you have to be willing to do terrible things. But who wants to be king? Not me! Being kind is highly regarded by people in general, and women in particular. Not every one. You will not end up being designated as a “nice guy” for simply being kind to women. You become a nice guy when you are nice to women in the hope of getting sex. Unless you’re very obvious that that’s why you’re being nice — that can be a fun way to flirt, if you can play it
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 04:46 PM
4

Your tit for tat mentality is the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 04:42 PM
3

Kind people can be taken advantage of, sometimes. It’s important to learn to draw boundaries, and enforce them. Genuine kindness — the sort that doesn’t expect anything in return — is a thing of great value. Nice guys are a dime a dozen
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 04:24 PM
4

This has been happening in colleges for a very long time. It’s just that women are now finding their voices to speak out about it
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 04:15 PM
3

You can just be an actually kind person and people will often respect you for it — it’s a great method for making friends that you don’t ever fuck! And it’s great to be kind to women you do want to fuck! What’s often criticized, rightly, is guys being “nice,” and pretending to be her friend, merely because they’re hoping it will let them get into a girl’s pants.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 03:50 PM
8

When women don’t respond well to more obvious flirting early on, you really have two options: 1) stop engaging with that woman — you clearly don’t have chemistry, or 2) become her friend, knowing it will just be a friendship, at best. There’s no double bind — she didn’t like you. Just get over it and decide whether you want to be her actual friend, or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 03:46 PM
1

And if they had a great time, recognize that there wasn’t chemistry, and can let go of their desire to make Chemistry happen, they might be able to make a genuinely wonderful new friend. Just don’t be the nice guy, and you might well end up finding you DO have chemistry with one of her girlfriends
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 01:59 PM
3

Men peacock and women choose. What’s new?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 12:06 PM
3

The fact that you find the activities and attitudes odious, which women tend to find attractive, is precisely why you’re having so much trouble with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 08:36 PM
1

Divorce is usually better for the child than living with parents who fight constantly, are miserable and resentful, or are abusive. Give women the power — they seem to make much better long-term choices, particularly where the interests of others are involved
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 06:21 PM

Complain away! I’m sure it’s getting the results you want!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 04:39 PM

But it’s not wrong. No one is doing anything to you, or denying you of any right
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 04:34 PM

Work on the things you can work on, and relax. That’s more than enough
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 04:31 PM
2

Don’t you have the same desire, too? To get money? So I guess you’re a gold digger?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 04:30 PM

If you don’t want to do it, don’t do it. But then stop complaining, too
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 04:29 PM

Because that’s simply not what’s happening. Don’t mistake OLD for reality
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 04:28 PM

Indeed, as women gain power to make their own choices, men find that they need to step up their game or be left behind
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 01:46 PM

The signal is in your bearing, and how you carry the long hair. You don't need to look all masculine. You can do long hair and fingernail polish and get tons of girls. But if you don't have a fierceness to your character, long hair might make you look too feminine for many women. Think of David Bowie as Ziggy Stardust. That guy got all the women (and many of the men, for a while). Or Marilyn Manson. It's all about how you pull it off, or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 01:28 PM
3

Whatever. Gold diggers are like nice guys. They deceive about their desires in the hopes that they will get what they want by that deception. Sex workers are not gold diggers, because there’s no deception. They’re just women who sell men sex, seven though they don’t necessarily want it themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 12:53 PM
2

Or the vastly more likely scenario — she found you vaguely unpleasant from the time she met you, and just put her head down and grinded through. Most people consider me fairly charming with women, but there’s been numerous times where we just don’t connect and it’s painful
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 04:59 AM
8

Exactly. I’m sure there’s a few people who think a $40 meal is worth sitting there being ogled by some bore for two hours. But since she could provide herself with the same sustenance for $7 or so, I doubt that it’s prevalent enough that any of is will ever meet such a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 03:13 AM
1

We’ll, that’s what I was talking about when I said “practice” in the first place. You were the one who took that to mean sexual practice. Again, if experience is such an impediment, pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 01:10 AM
22

I’m sure there’s a few poor girls who are disgusted with men and find this amusing. But it’s like begging on the corner for money — it’s a hell of a hard way to get cash.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 01:08 AM
1

This is very true. Emotional vulnerability means that you’re willing to show your weaknesses. But don’t do it right away. And don’t try to use your girlfriend as a therapist — that will ALWAYS turn her against you
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 01:02 AM
5

Honestly, judging by the reports I’ve heard and read from women, and even much of what I’ve seen at sex clubs and play parties, reading those books is BETTER than real life experience. Also, if you’re so uptight that you can’t try to learn to talk with women, then start seeing escorts. You’ll gain experience and hopefully get more comfortable with your body and sexuality. No shame in exploring, just do it carefully and with respect for the women
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 12:12 AM
5

Patience and practice And in the mean time, stop complaining and read books like She Comes First, Come as You Are, and *UrbanTantra. Maybe toss in **Little Birds and Tropic of Cancer
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 11:56 PM
0

No
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 10:34 PM
3

Learn to be better lovers and communicators, so that you're not frightened of women with experience. This whole virgin obsession seems like kind of a pedo thing
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 09:48 PM
1

It means they want to feel calm and safe, so they can relax deeply, within the circle of your care
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 07:26 PM
2

We took the good and left the bad. We’re both very attractive,and read very masculine and feminine. We’ve accepted some traditional gender roles — I drive and fix stuff, she cooks. We have a very intimate D/s relationship in the bedroom. But then she makes more money than me, and is much more successful. We’re monogamish, and have played more often with men than women. I do 70% of the childcare. We met by talking about poetry and science. We have an amazing relationship, and a stellar sex-life. …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 06:51 PM
1

Certainly there's a massive male backlash against the opening of women's sexuality. It's been transformative for so many women, but as is clear from this sub, sexually-empowered women are terrifying to many men. And, of course, there will be a bunch of women who go along with the resentment, for a wide variety of reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 03:46 PM

Yeah, if you want to know how to do it, go to Italy and study under the masters. So much better than the cold gamesmanship of American men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 01:14 PM
4

Not at all, but the state of single men in America is such that not even that very basic level is typically available.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 10:39 PM
1

If you've got chemistry and shared life goals, then you should be pretty happy. That's a match, whatever ranking you'd get on your looks from strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 07:49 PM
2

Nah. Most of the guys I know who have ended up with really terrible women are very high value guys who just don’t have any moderation with women and get trapped. Doctors are a common, since they’re often lonely and always busy — but lots of busy, accomplished, slightly socially awkward guys run into this. Emotionally unstable women target them and basically love bomb them. Then they fall in love, and they’re characteristically very devoted, so they don’t leave when they realize they’re up to the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 12:34 PM
1

Most couples who have lived together for more than 5 years or so are struggling with a dead bedroom. There’s lots of causes, there, but certainly one problem is often that the man or woman gained a bunch of weight after having a child, and doesn’t feel sexy, or find their partner sexy. But it’s not a problem wiith the guy being average looking to begin with. The couples I know who continue to have exciting sex lives after many years of marriage are quite diverse in looks and everything else. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 11:34 AM
3

Many, many women become deeply disappointed with their lackluster sex lives and routine home lives. They don’t want gangbangs (much), but they want passion and skilled lovers, among other things
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/23 10:47 PM

The women aren’t better, they’re just much, much poorer
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/23 07:47 PM
2

She can pursue any higher value guy she wants, except the one she reports to for work. And she can even pressure that guy, and he can pursue her, with the knowledge that if she ends up pissed at him, he’ll likely lose his job
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/23 06:59 PM
3

Simps are also known as nice guys. And they’ve been around for a long, long time
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/23 06:58 PM
6

Comparison is the thief of joy. But you want to know the comparisons that will really burn you? The comparisons to all the experiences that she HASN'T had, but ends up creating elaborate imaginings about, especially if her experience with you is lackluster.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/23 04:24 PM
1

Workplace romance is very common at every level. People higher up the ladder are more particular. What’s now off-limits is workplace romance with a superior who has potentially coercive power over the inferior.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/23 03:21 PM
4

Men can do that too. But they never get a chance to learn what they actually like because they’re always so obsessed with winning the pussy prize
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/23 01:34 PM
1

70%, if you include the married ones
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 11:07 PM
1

Look at the hottest man and hottest woman magazine covers over the decades. The objective quality is lacking, though these some objective elements. Maybe 40% objective, 40% cultural norms, and 20% totally singular
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 10:55 PM
0

Absolutely. Divorce is often a great choice, given the circumstances. Monogamy is also not so natural. In fact, it’s mostly honored in the beach (especially by men) in most traditional societies. Contemplating the possibility of nonmonogamy is really liberating, especially at the beginning of a relationship. Then a choice of monogamy is fully chosen, not just forced into people by unrealistic cultural norms
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 09:03 PM
2

Education seems to work even better. Just ask Socrates and Jesus
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 07:29 PM
1

Your central premise is false. Women don’t have less libido, they just have a different libido. Come as You Are treats this issue with depth, and should be required reading for everyone interested in speculating about sexual dynamics https://spotify.link/wzedc0198Cb
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 06:13 PM
2

Everyone should communicate better and clearer. Go read She Comes First and Come as You Are and be part of the solution
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 02:18 PM
3

Women are very concerned about preserving these rights for future generations of people. But having tons of kids is not the way to do that. The world is so overpopulated with people that our ecology will collapse if we continue. Most of the large animals are going extinct, many of the bugs and birds and sea creatures. Climate change will create massive problems, as is, and will only get worse. What we need is for more of the world’s women to gain self-sovereignty.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 01:45 PM
1

A lot of clever words to say that the frequency of appalling behavior by single men isn’t that great. And if you define “appalling behavior” as “serial killer or worse,” then the frequency is indeed quite low. But I’d ask any woman here: is the frequency of appalling behavior by single men, judged by what a reasonable person would consider appalling, high or low?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 01:12 AM
1

Women should deal with this by ignoring the dictates of resentful, controlling men with little understanding
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 09:24 PM
1

The stigma against single men exists in substantial part because so many single men behave so appallingly badly, over and over and over
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 05:00 PM
1

Totally not true — many men are golden retrievers, and will be loyal even to women who are terrible or abusive
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 04:37 PM
1

Most of the things you believe about the opposite sex are wrong about most of them. And super wrong about any given one of them
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 11:18 PM
1

This is all just dogmatism
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 09:37 PM

I’ve never seen a chivalrous guy who has trouble. Unless you mean the Renaissance fair type of chivalry. Then they should read Don Quixote
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 08:58 PM
6

The third space thing is a big deal. Part of the reason so much of America has succumbed to the warm comfort of opioid addiction. Walkable cities are much better, but they’re few and far between in the vast parking lot of the USA Also, American norms of masculinity fail to teach young men how to arouse or please women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 07:46 PM
2

Honestly, RP is even worse when it comes to trying to rationalize sexual relations. Just go out there and start talking to women and trying to seduce them
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 01:35 PM
8

For sure! I love strong women
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/23 11:36 PM
2

No shade — appreciate it!
/r/seduction13/09/23 10:23 PM
1

“You’re league” is an empirical fact based on who will go out with you, not the result of a deduction from first principles. If you don’t ask, then you’re limiting what’s possible
/r/seduction13/09/23 10:05 PM
0

People want quality. But knowing quality requires judgment, and judgment comes from experience. And it takes a lot of experience to know yourself and what’s really quality for you. Which also takes experience. Further, it takes a lot of emotional and communication skills to take a relationship with quality potential and turn it into an actual, quality relationship. But experience only translates into judgment if there’s honest reflection
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/23 09:52 PM
1

These are all correct, but they’re not formulaic. Each one of these elements is fairly specific to each woman. Guys, there’s obvious things you can do to make itself generally more attractive. But the biggest thing is just getting out there and getting to know women and trying to find a spark and then cultivate it into a bonfire. Complaining about women on Reddit pants going to help you one bit. It will make you resentful, and women can smell that shit from a thousand yards
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/23 08:00 PM
1

You are what you are. But you’re not the things you tell yourself about yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/23 12:24 PM
2

The lengths guys will go to in order to justify their fear and resentment of women’s freedom and sexual exploration! The number of men a woman has been with is irrelevant. Her character matters. The two are related, but not the way people here seem to think
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/23 12:02 PM
1

These kinds of thought experiments are of very limited value. They might help elucidate the rational values of a person, but most of our actual decision making is sub-rational. And that’s especially true for attraction and love. When someone becomes aroused, falls into limerance, or falls in love, their values are profoundly shifted. Stop with this fruitless speculation, and learn to create the conditions to make women aroused by you. Learn to talk to them. Become curious about them woman in fro…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/23 12:34 AM

Get off the dating apps, and don't get stuck in some sense of your identity as this or that, and the world changes. Otherwise, seems like you're arguing that the only option is to give up. Then follow your own advice, accept what you believe to be reality, and stop complaining
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/23 05:48 PM
1

I don't even know what that means. I respect the women I date 100% as my equals in a fundamental sense. And I respect women of similar capacity to me (such as my wife, who's frankly better than me in most ways) as my equal or better. But I love to be a man. And I love women. And I love to seduce and dominate the women that I'm with, with their full consent, of course. Different people feel differently about sexuality and gender. Fortunately, today, we don't need hard, top-down norms about the co…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/23 03:48 PM
1

I spent many years studying logic and mathematics. Pretty sure I haven’t contradicted myself. But if I did, it was in service of conveying the larger truth. Reality is fuzzy, especially at the level of people. The sooner you accept that, and learn to loosen your mental hold on the law of the excluded middle, the sooner you’ll be able to see what’s actually happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/23 03:07 PM
1

Sure, it’s somewhat harder for less visually attractive guys to find partners, especially for flings. But I can tell you with confidence — flings aren’t very satisfying unless there’s serious chemistry, and then you usually want a deeper relationship anyway. The only flings I’ve really loved are the ones I have with my wife and a third person.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/23 02:03 PM
1

Most women don't get aroused spontaneously, the way men do. It's not just about how someone looks. It's about the way they present themselves in the space, and among their friends and strangers, and in relationship. Sure, being hot makes things easier. Especially when you're playing OLD. And if you're carrying 20+ lbs of excess weight, go to the gym. But it's easy for a mediocre looking man to get all the girls, if he has charisma and humor or authority, or just something special, whereas it's n…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 11:42 PM
0

Being attractive to women is only a little bit about looks. Sure, a great looking guy will have an easier time. But women are much more diverse than men in what they find "good looking," and they care about looks less than men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 07:43 PM
1

We're talking about averages, aren't we? But I guess only around 40% of men have some signs of male pattern baldness at age 35. Minoxidil works on most male pattern baldness caused by genetics. https://myhair.life/blog/age-men-go-bald/
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 05:57 PM
3

I think the real issue is the abysmal state of American men. Stop complaining, go read Come as You Are, to find out what women actually tend to like and what tends to arouse them, and how different they can be from one another and from what you think. Then read She Comes First, so you're ready to actually satisfy a woman once you find one you want a relationship with. And if you're really ambitious, try Urban Tantra.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 05:35 PM
2

It's all about the cultural ideals of a man who is worldly and experienced and can defend/protect/hunt, and the woman who is virginal and pure and innocent and sheltered and can bear children and care for the home. It's not actually a great life (for most women and some men), but it's a pretty simple ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 04:08 PM
1

And the forty year old guy should have a receding hairline. Just pay attention in the real world — apparently guys don’t know about minoxidil, because most guys over 35 are getting pretty thin at the temples and in the back
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 03:04 PM
5

The 40 year old woman is a 7 for her age. Generally pretty close, though
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 12:09 PM
2

Sort yourself out, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 11:56 AM
5

Hopefully young men will get out from behind their phone screens and start talking to women in the wild. The book **Come as You Are** is a great set of lessons on what women actually like, and what arouses them. No need for endless speculation when you can just read some relatively rigorous social science on the subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/23 08:29 PM
1

Many people are terrified of sexually empowered women. Men get especially worked up about it. The really repressed guys are especially prone to violence, whether in speech or act. Those people are welcome to their tiny, shitty worlds, as long as they don't try to impose them on the rest of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/23 01:56 PM
-1

Yeah, you’re constrained by lots of factors, to greater and lesser degrees, but you have infinite choice within that space
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/23 05:46 AM
1

Under 5’4”, dude needs to date short girls. But I have an ex who’s an absolute knockout, and brilliant, and who was totally in love with a guy who was 5’6”. They were together a few years, and his height was not an issue. She’s got a bit of a thing for big guys, now, but it’s just a plus factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/23 05:42 AM
21

There aren’t many traditional women in places where they don’t have to be traditional, because it’s a fairly shitty life. Non-traditional women are non traditional in a million ways. It doesn’t mean that they do the negation of whatever a traditional woman is supposed to do, in every circumstance. It just means they can choose whatever the hell life they want, just like men can.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/23 12:50 AM
1

I didn’t see your citation, and couldn’t find the study you’re referring to. But even if what you’re saying is true, the aggregate preference of women is much flatter, because individual women have much more variation in preference from one another. So there a lot of space to be yourself, and find a woman who loves that. Unfortunately, for women, that’s not so true
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 03:47 PM
2

Totally not true. Lots of rich losers, and lots of poor guys with genuine confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 03:18 PM
3

Internal confidence is the only kind with having. Sometimes it can be helpful to take it till you make it, but the aim should be to gain genuine confidence through self-understanding, not to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 03:18 PM
1

Women have high standards, but they don’t have uniform standards. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090626153511.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 02:35 PM
1

Of available women, older than you, I’d bet a solid 20-30% would be interested in taking a younger man as a lover. But that’s mostly true once you hit your mid-20s. In the teens and early twenties, men are just such dorks
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 01:06 AM
0

Yeah, rating people is a massive effort toward self-defeat and de-humanization. "Comparison is the thief of joy" as T. Roosevelt said. But if someone is really so obsessed that they have to do it, at least they should be honest
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 11:05 PM
0

What was your argument, then?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 11:03 PM
1

That's insane. You clearly know nothing of what you're talking about. The vast majority of high value men want high value women, not hot pieces of arm candy. At least to marry
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 10:19 PM
0

You don't need to date "most women." You only need to date one or two
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 10:16 PM
8

These rankings are insane. I walk around the streets of NYC, and Margot Robbie or Emma Stone would be super hot in any context. I genuinely feel bad for women that have to deal with these idiots. Of course, if we could adjust the ranking so that a 5 looked remotely like an average woman, that would be a start. In the world of online men, an actual 5 is ranked a 2, and a 10 is a 8. But then what is the standard deviation. Because in the online world, it seems like a 9 or 10 must be something like…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 10:07 PM
0

Only half true. If you have a great attitude and are emotionally mature and intellectually interesting, you can find an older woman who will happily teach you all kinds of things
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 05:27 PM
2

Neither of those are really qualities I care about in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 04:11 PM
1

I believe that's generally true. More important, yet, is that the guys with hot girlfriends are usually well-centered. They serve as ground and guard for their girl, and don't get all bent out of shape about things.
/r/seduction06/09/23 01:10 PM
1

Maybe you shouldn't be looking to society's standards for what is right in relationships (or elsewhere). Society's standards are useful for dealing with "society." Not so much for dealing with individuals or yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 12:42 PM
1

Everyone wants someone who's special. The most important way for someone to be special is for them to think that their partner is the most special, amazing person in the world for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 03:01 AM
8

Blaming the victim. That's like religious people saying it's not the fault of the religious leaders that they had sex with 14 year olds, because the 14 year olds were all hot and sultry and seductive.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 03:42 PM
1

Once you just accept the roles, it's fine. In fact, I love being a man, though it took me many years of experiment, observation, reading, and reflecting, before I got a sense of what it meant to be a good man. The problem is that men tend to have spontaneous desire, and women tend to have responsive desire. Most men just get horny, near randomly. Most women only get horny when they've been seduced. What is seduction? It's cultivating the conditions to arouse a woman and get her into the mental s…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 03:38 PM
1

Some women enjoy some of the erotic attention that they get from being seen as hot. Is there anyone who has ever disagreed with this?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 04:07 AM
2

It’s only a problem if you make it one, or refuse to accept that your actions and attitudes change the relationship. For me, my biggest problem is that I have too much amazing sex and not enough sleep. Because I’ve taken responsibility for my role. And because I’ve worked hard to cultivate the responses and relationships that benefit me, and the others I relate with, as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 04:06 PM
2

They can have casual sex, but with average girls. And remember, most really good looking guys aren’t having tons of casual sex, either, because most people don’t really want to have random sex with perks. Seems good when you’re wanking, but not so good when you’re trying to put the moves on some girl you care nothing for
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/23 11:06 PM
3

Spot on. There PP and RP ideologies seem only to be resentment and inaction. They’re a virus destroying the lives of young men, and doing little positive
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/23 07:10 PM
6

My biggest problem right now is that I haven’t slept more than five hours a night in the last two weeks. Why not? Because even when I say that we’re not having sex tonight, we end up having sex for two hours! We’ve only been married 12 years, though. It’s possible to keep having amazing sex. But it’s on the man to keep her hot for him, and to pleasure her like a goddess. And is rarely comfortable
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/23 02:05 PM
3

Lesbian women are better at making their partners come, but worse at preserving the erotic charge that makes sex enticing. As a man, take this as a great reason to read She Comes First — you, too, can become as good a lover as a lesbian! And maybe hold onto the eros a little longer, too
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/23 02:02 PM
4

Men are to women’s orgasms as the conductor is to the symphony. You wave your stick around in time with the music, and variously emphasize certain moments to help coordinate and play with the energies moving through her body. But she plays all the instruments. Go read “She Cones First,” and learn to help women orgasm. Men with an attitude like the one you’re showing here are exactly the reason women have such unsatisfying sex lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/23 01:59 PM
2

Yeah, it's illegal like weed used to be illegal. There is very, very little legal risk in seeing a sex worker in nearly any country I've been to. In fact, the more legally/politically conservative countries have more pervasive and easily available (and worse treated) sex workers!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 03:48 PM
0

Nah. I know lots of attractive guys who’s wives don’t fuck them. It’s just something that happens. This obsession with physical attractiveness just fails to understand women. Sure, many like a good looking guy with a hot body, especially if they only want sex (which isn’t often!). But their attraction and arousal is much more emotional and psychological.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 03:03 PM
2

Nah, most guys over 20 are dating. They’re just not mostly dating models. I live in NYC. I walk out my door and see tons of people of all shapes and sizes and features, walking aroubd or sitting at cafes, clearly couples.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 02:57 AM
1

Just hollow out the center, and let the body move itself
/r/seduction29/08/23 05:47 PM
1

The ones who reproduce are the fittest
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 08:43 PM
1

I've hooked up with a few women simply because they offered themselves to me, and I felt like it would be unkind or foolish to refuse. Always a mistake
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 03:06 PM
5

You can't really trust anyone to know what they want. Better to pay attention to what they like, after they've liked it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 02:35 AM

There’s also the fact that, due to parents aborting their female children, there’s a huge shortage of young women. This is all very necessary, though. There’s too many people in the world. We’re literally killing all the other animals off, and trashing the place. The only real solution is lower populations. It’s going to be a tough century, though, given that our economic theories are all based on endless growth
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 02:58 PM
2

I wouldn’t recommend trying to fuck anyone on the first date (though you shouldn’t be opposed to it!). But women will expect you to flirt in a way that shows interest, and to try to escalate, somewhat
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 10:17 PM
0

That's true in most places. In the USA, it's really not true. Our social norms are almost all very new, and they mostly bite.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 05:08 PM
7

You've got some more road to travel, friend. "traditional" or "conventional" wisdom is correct about 30% of the time, for people who are fairly average in their attributes and desires. Those people are welcome to have their wisdom, as long as they don't try to force it on me by violence or law.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 04:41 PM

I've thought a great deal about why so many men are feeling so disconnected and constantly simmering with resentment. I think part of it is really that American masculinity is profoundly broken -- other than a vague duty to family and country, there's little in the expectations of American masculinity that is good for men or anyone else. And, on the other side, American feminism's expectations of men are better, but often silly and self-defeating, if not practically impossible. I think a big par…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 03:11 PM

Yeah, no. You're thinking "Compare and Contrast." This is just a simile. It's like saying white peoples outperfomed black peoples in the apartaid. That's a comparison that is saying the two are similar. In this comparison, men are cast as subjugated and hindered under American law in a way comparable to the way that SA law subjugated and hindered black South Africans. And American women are given advantage after advantage, much as white South Africans were under apartheid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 02:03 PM

I've literally NEVER been sad to be a man, because it's awesome in so many ways. Especially since I long ago parted ways with the stupidity that is American masculinity and decided to do things my own way. Women love me, and because I'm emotionally present and balanced, I have amazing relationships. I'm dominant in bed, love going to orgies, and commonly have experiences that most people couldn't dream of. And almost everybody gives my words and actions authority, just because I'm a masculine gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 01:49 PM
1

Are you comparing the treatment of men and women in the present day USA to the treatment of blacks and whites in apartheid South Africa? This list includes some genuine advantages that women have (and a few they don’t). It fails to mention the advantages that men have. This sub is so intransigently delusional that I’m afraid it’s not with the effort, any longer. If you really believe it’s so much easier and better to be a woman today in the USA, you’re in luck — you can change your gender, or ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 02:14 AM
1

Because it’s hard to imagine how much people (including oneself) will change in a decade
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 10:05 PM
1

Sure, if you just say "perfect" and don't give that any actual attributes, then it's not a checklist. But you're specifically asking for a checklist of what makes a perfect girl. What I'm telling you is that the perfect girl for you is not one that you will find by using a checklist. It wasn't sad at all that I found the perfect girl and didn't click with her! It was an awakening. I will say that she agreed that we didn't have chemistry and was about to break up with me when I broke up with her.…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 04:31 PM
2

Women who have jobs that they love are blooming flowers full of erotic energy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/23 04:26 PM
1

I had a checklist of the perfect woman. Then I met her, seduced her, and found that we were duds together. Dump the checklists, folks. It's just mental chatter getting in the way of meeting someone that you really click with
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/23 03:52 PM
1

Sure, but it's not like the girls were going to be knocking down his door when he was just sitting there in his bedroom by himself, before. Mental illness is justifiably a serious impediment to dating. Severe shyness as well. Similarly, assholes may get laid sometimes, but they have a terrible time forming fulfilling relationships. If we don't work on ourselves, we shouldn't be too surprised when people don't get excited to be around us. Personally, I think you can date whenever. But for a decen…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 01:54 AM
1

Well, then, good luck approaching with your thirst drooling out of your [mouth], or on OLD. If you want to keep doing the same thing, and complain that you keep getting the same result, then you must enjoy the complaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 10:35 PM

Sounds like it's impossible! Must be a miracle how all these guys do it. I'd suggest getting off the internet, out of your head, and out into the world talking with women and enjoying them for who they are in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 04:13 PM
1

Those are all, indeed, signs of interest. But somewhere during the subsequent interaction, something happened to change these women’s minds. I suspect they intuited that it were the kinds of person who spends time on the internet complaining about how unfair things are for them with women
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 08:40 PM
0

The posts on this site that complain about terrible with women are almost always using language.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 07:02 PM
1

Fat single dad can also find someone nice, if they get lucky and lower their standards
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 05:00 PM
1

That’s total nonsense. I mean, it might be true for that one pool party OP went to, or saw on YouTube. But it’s certainly not generally true
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 10:58 PM
1

There’s lots of hot young things who are just looking to be pampered for a bit, and travel. And rich guys often have a certain, stupid confidence
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 01:19 PM
20

Sure, those guys can be assholes. But women generally know exactly what they’re getting with the assholes. They might try to change them, but the guys are usually fairly transparent. Nice guys aren’t such assholes, at least not obviously. But they actually are treating women in the same instrumental way — as mere tools for their pleasure. The nice guy hopes that, because he’s a shoulder to lean on for his object of desire, and because he does all sorts of nice things for her, that she’ll eventua…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 01:24 PM

The women filter based on the filters that are available, and those filters are quite limited in OLD. Guys have to get out of the OLD rut. The world is much fresher and more full of possibilities when you experience it with all your senses.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 08:38 PM
0

You know who else lied to you -- your chemistry and physics teachers! Remember when they taught you that the atom was like the solar system? False! The values that your mom taught you were good. The golden rule is good. But they were too simple, and they left out a lot of weird, kinky stuff that people try to keep stuffed down in their unconscious but turns them on. It's not really true that you should "do unto others as you would have them do to you." You should probably "do unto others as they…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 07:25 PM
1

Life is different than you think. Get our there and learn what actually turns you on
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 02:52 PM
3

Depends on what you mean by “sexually attractive.” I take “attractive” to generally mean that a person’s looks attract my attention. But “chemistry” is a thicker concept, including voice, the way a person carries themselves, the spark in their eye, whether they laugh at my jokes and appreciate my interests, how they smell, etc. We have chemistry we each get aroused around each other. For instance, I find Megan Fox and Angelina Jolie objectively hot, but wouldn’t sleep with either of them because…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 08:57 PM
1

I had an amazing time dating >25. But I think a big part of that was having mostly older girlfriends when I was <25
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 01:15 PM
1

Chemistry is much more about the way someone smells or the way someone's eyes twinkle when they laugh, than it is about the way someone looks. If you were getting more dates, you would quickly realize that most "attractive" women are not a good match, because you don't really have chemistry with them. You know for sure when you're having sex, and it's just feeling kind of mechanical. Then you learn not to pursue those women further. That doesn't mean that those women aren't "objectively" attract…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 06:59 PM
0

This is an intense practice that is very powerful bit can be destabilizing. I would suggest that one also practice tonglen with oneself while looking in the mirror. At least sometimes https://mindworks.org/blog/tonglen-meditation-how-to-practice/
/r/seduction04/08/23 01:17 PM
1

Not really. A person doesn’t usually have the capacity to have more than a few fully committed, maybe-forever relationships. After someone has had their heart broken once or twice (usually just from the fact that love alone doesn’t prevent a relationship from crumbling), they set up some defenses against getting hurt. And they recognize that they don’t have the energy and time to just throw them into whatever relationship they first come upon. So they start to get more picky about where they dev…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 10:15 PM
1

You’re talking about different issues. Sure, if someone has been in a couple of serious, long-term relationships, they’re likely to be more hesitant to commit, because they’ve been hurt before. But that’s got little to do with gender or someone’s level of sexual experience — many people can make it to their thirties without exploring sexually harshly at all, despite having been in one or two serious relationships. And, on the other side, people who had long term relationships and were not too ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 09:51 PM
1

I've never experienced anything short of exceptional pair-bonding with the women I've dated seriously (numbering 5). And all but the first of them had fairly extensive experience before me. I really don't think there's any causal relationship between sexual experience (short of something truly exceptional or simply abusive) and pair bonding. However, there might be something to the fact that most of the women who are bad at pair bonding, and are fairly attractive, will tend to have more sexual r…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 08:50 PM
2

Exactly -- many young men are such selfish lovers that they'd rather find a woman who doesn't have any experience. Why? Because he can't satisfy her in bed, and rather than learning to become a great lover who consistently provides deep sexual satisfaction to his partners, he wants to take the lazy path by marrying a woman who doesn't have experience of how good sex can really be, so she doesn't complain and leave him when he doesn't sexually satisfy her.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 05:34 PM
1

I’d say the actual facts aren’t terribly relevant, here. What we know for sure is that for most of western history, Pericles was known both as the possibly greatest leader of the golden age of Athens, and one of its greatest men (in an age when men, truly, could lift a stone twice as large as any man could, today). AND he was generally regarded as having a mistress who was a courtesan and also his central advisor on important affairs of state. So, sure, she wasn’t his wife. But she was the one h…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 01:48 AM
17

Specifically, I think these boys are afraid that a woman will have had much better lovers than them. Of course, guys would be better off learning to become a great lover, but that would take a lot of time away from whining about how life isn’t fair for men. It’s much easier to ensure that she’s sexually “satisfied” by keeping her ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 12:29 AM
2

Don't sleep with someone until you're comfortable sleeping with them, and excited about the prospect. Try to be clear eyed about his commitment and whether trust is justified, and how much trust you really need for the relationship you're seeking with the guy. Once you've decided, you can always change your mind, but let go of the deliberation and enjoy the sex. ​ The rest is just a bunch of speculation -- some guys will be unhappy no matter what a woman does.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 01:48 PM
1

Tell that to Pericles
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 01:38 PM
4

There’s nothing emasculating about marrying a woman who’s had kinky sex with other men. That’s all in your head, buddy. The value of marriage is a bit less than it used to be for men, and far less than ever for women, which is why women initiate 2x as many divorces as men. Men in most societies go to prostitutes, and if they have real money, it’s common to have mistresses. Women were the ones really trapped, but their other options were often even worse. I would never encourage anyone to get mar…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 01:07 AM
4

That’s an interesting reflection. I wonder if part of the problem isn’t also that men want more sex with their partner, while women have been shown to get much more bored with their partner’s routines. And so while women may want more sex, they don’t necessarily want more of the sex they’re currently having
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 01:55 PM
1

Definitely not. There’s plenty of guys with lots of experience but poor skills. It takes some experience to become skilled, but not that much. I’d say that meditation experience is more likely than sexual experience to make you an excellent, attentive, and sensual lover. Even better is meditation and training from an older woman
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 11:19 PM
2

Nobody is getting hot for “mediocre.” Start being your best self!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 08:15 PM
5

Totally not true. How do you guys come up with this stuff? I’m a handsome guy, and I always gotten the same responses from women during my needy phases that any other needy guy gets — they look at me like I’m a creep and end the interaction promptly. What’s probably different from a normal guy is that, if I’m depressed and go to a bar and look mournful, there’s a greater than zero chance that a woman will try to pick me up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 05:40 PM
2

Let’s ignore his self-absorption and preening, and assume that women are seeing him on the beach in his swimsuit. He’s hot, and that’s enough to get interest. But think about sex. Forget even about lifetime relationships (looks fade, etc.) or even short-term relationships (you get accustomed to a person, and they’re hotness fades with their freshened over a couple years, usually). Let’s just talk about women looking for one night stands. Men are largely the tops in most sexual relationships, mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 04:37 PM
1

Yes, they care about “all that” a great deal. Let’s ignore his self-absorption and preening, and assume that women are seeing him on the beach in his swimsuit. He’s hot, and that’s enough to get interest. But think about sex. Men are largely the tops in most sexual relationships, making they control the action to a great extent. A man generally needs to be aroused by the way a woman looks, and the way she responds to him, in order to have a pleasant sexual experience. As long as he’s well arouse…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 04:31 PM
3

Why do you think “young and attractive girls” want that guy? I mean, some of them probably get aroused by him. Enough that he probably doesn’t have much trouble finding a partner. But most “attractive” young women won’t find him attractive, just based on his looks and style and the character he presents. And, among the ones that can get aroused a bit by his pictures, most of them would find him a poor match if they were to date with any seriousness.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 04:21 PM
2

Yes! On the one hand — improve yourself. Work on your body and character and emotional awareness, and especially your relationship/communication skills (little value in seducing women if you can’t manage to cultivate a healthy relationship with her). On the other hand — be confident with who you are! The vast majority of guys who get out there are dating cute girls that they really like. Women are much more varied and accepting than you believe, especially if you’re genuinely kind and attentive …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 04:52 PM
2

Then you haven’t looked around. I’m traditionally handsome, and I have a bunch of friends who are traditionally handsome. I’ve had a number of women break up with me, and my friends . . . my god, there’s more train wrecks than not. People are unhappy, and they bring that into relationships. On top of that, being traditionally handsome says nothing about whether you have relationship skills or make good choices of women. Additionally, traditionally handsome men often have to deal with increased j…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 12:06 AM
1

There's a tiny bit of truth to it. Just enough to support a massive scaffolding of speculations by the manosphere. Drop the speculation, and just deal with fact -- particularly your actual lived experience. More men than women cheat, probably. Many traditional societies have norms in place to deal with attractive men cheating -- going to brothels is still fairly common and accepted in many countries, even in Europe. And mistresses are pretty much expected for wealthy men. Women who don't want a …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 03:32 PM

I’ve never met such a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 08:59 AM
2

Thank you! That was a Herculean labor, but I dearly hope it can go a good way toward ridding young men of this pernicious, self-defeating piece of misogynist ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 03:12 AM
1

Get over it and pay for the date. But don't make a big thing about it, and don't expect anything from it. If she asks if she can pay half, tell her you've got it. If she brings it up again, let her pay half with grace and appreciation. If you don't want to pay much, don't go somewhere expensive. I always took women to cool, inexpensive places, and it never turned anyone off from me except for the gold-diggers (and I wasn't a good fit for them, so everyone won)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 09:27 PM
8

Yeah, seems like a frustrated voyeur. You want to see average people having average kinds of sex, go to an average sex club. You almost certainly won’t have sex with anyone, but you’ll see a lot of average people in average relationships having sex. Might be eye opening
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 07:28 PM
5

Why are you obsessing about this nonsense? Just go live your life
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 03:07 PM
0

I'm quite attractive, charming, enjoy flirting, and live in NYC. I have TONS of opportunities to cheat. I've certainly never done it, though, nor do I expect to in the future. But my wife and I like to have threesomes and group sex
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 01:26 PM
1

Great little test! Hope you can find a dating style that helps you find a great companion and hot lover, while letting you feel like your authentic self!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 07:19 PM

Nah, your interpretation is miserly. If you’re happy just wanking off, that’s probably for the best for everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 09:05 PM

All this language is totally ideological, and dehumanizing. "Pump and dump throughout your entire 20s," "dual mating strategy," "can't remain faithful," etc. You seem to believe these are factual statements about the world, when they're actually very skewed and ungenerous (i.e., miserly) interpretations. Men aren't expected to provide for anyone, except themselves. And my wife is totally faithful to me, despite the fact that she sometimes fucks another guy. Drop the propaganda, and the world bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 07:49 PM

You’re obviously welcome to your preferences. But most of those sentiments are pretty irrational — mostly just based on fear and susceptibility to “peer” opinion. Unfortunately, there’s been an indoctrination of sad boys into the “alpha” club of insecure misogynists. Doesn’t seem to make anyone happy, but it makes money for the propagandists while keeping the poor rubes coming back for their fix of resentment and indignation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 07:28 PM

Your vision of women is pretty miserly, to put it kindly. But, indeed, just as men find that they often like to watch porn, even while in a sexually satisfying relationship, and watch different pornstars and not just always same one, so women enjoy sexual variety. Hardly surprising
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 07:23 PM

Are you trying out for a position in right wing media hysterics? Women can already cheat I hope more women explore the joys of consensual nonmonogamy. And if she wants to do that, and you’re scared to try or really value strict sexual exclusivity, then maybe you break up. Better than getting cheated on
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 06:41 PM
1

Oh, whatever. 16 year old girls might be hot, but they’re naive and incapable of effectively understanding consequences. To try to have sex with them when you’re more than a few years older is predatory, abusive, and should be criminal in the places where it isn’t already. And men should grow up and stop sexually predating on women who don’t know better
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 07:15 PM
-1

I guess it depends on what you value — I love beauty, self-confidence based in self-knowledge, and a little experience
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 07:04 PM
1

Because they do. 16 year old girls are often HOT. 16 year old boys are usually pimply, gangly, awkward messes. Women hit their prime, in my view, between 27 and 35. Men between 30 and 45
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 06:21 PM
3

Couldn’t care less, though I actively dislike gym bodies. I appreciate good proportions, and rarely mind a firm body, and that may require the gym for some women
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 08:15 PM

Indeed
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 07:43 PM
7

I don’t think most of these “alpha” traits are that popular among women — it’s mostly guys getting all wet about alpha guys. But your point about unusual traits is very true, and applies to a lot of traits that aren’t in the “alpha” set. You just have to identify those traits that you have, and find a way to communicate them
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 07:42 PM
5

How do you know? I’d be willing to bet that the minority of women under 30 do not find Thor hot. And probably less than a majority for Changing Tatum
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 07:39 PM
3

You can’t manufacture initial attraction, but the initial attraction is only barely about the way you look. It’s about how she feels in your presence
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 07:33 PM
-2

Attraction isn’t negotiated, but it’s also not determined by physical features
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 07:32 PM
3

Niceness is easy, but genuine kindness is a life-long project
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 05:49 PM
1

For sure
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 01:40 AM
2

Ok, but there’s a lot of different ways to do consensual nonmonogamy. I can’t speak to all of them, just this one
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 01:40 AM
5

I’m in an open marriage. Specifically, we’re sexually non-exclusive, emotionally semi-exclusive, and socially/legally totally exclusive. That means we play together, in the context of threesomes, foursomes, orgies, etc. And we’re kinky in sone other ways, as well. Our experience has been amazing. We only opened about 2 years ago, after well over a decade of marriage. Genuine sexual discovery, amazing fun adventures, profound insight into ourselves and our relationship, tremendously improved comm…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 01:25 AM
5

Those things are also not intrinsically humiliating. Depends on how big a man you are, or how small
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 01:11 AM
2

So true
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 01:09 AM
18

Right, and that person will rightly end up in prison, because humans have decided they don’t want to live like that
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 12:20 AM
4

Right, the lesson here is to be careful approaching in the workplace. And, if you do and you’re turned down, best to just avoid any unusual interaction with that woman for a bit, until things cool off. But the vast majority of reports to HR lead to HR making a record, and nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 11:24 PM
49

Humiliation is an interpretation that you layer onto the world, not a natural feature of the world
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 11:20 PM
-2

If I think through my high school graduating class, almost all the least physically attractive people are in relationships, unless they also have developmental disabilities or are antisocial in fairly obvious ways
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 09:14 PM
-1

I mean, it’s certainly possible that your looks aren’t helping you. But even very good looking guys can have trouble getting laid if their head isn’t in the right place. And there’s tons of ugly guys in relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 09:02 PM
2

The only women who hit on me are under 25, or over 50. Not sure what that says about me
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 06:57 PM
-2

"Sex positive" does not mean you have to listen to guys complaining about why they deserve to get laid, but don't. If you're not getting laid at all, it's not your looks. Personality may not be easy to change, but much can be changed with work. Get rid of the resentment and the victimization. Go pick up **Urban Tantra** and practice the exercises in there until you get good at them. Then work on your social skills and reading body/facial cues.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 05:58 PM
16

I suspect part of it is that women don’t really want to get some guy obsessed with her, unless she’s really sure she wants to be seeing him seriously. If she starts out with that, then turns out not to have chemistry with him, he’s still liable to get expectant and pushy
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 03:20 PM
11

Are you in a position in your life where you think you’re ready to be guiding people’s life choices? Are you wise? Why would an 18 year old woman let you take her reigns, except that she’s too naive to know better? Or is that the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 02:52 PM

Dating apps suck. Try talking with people in the world
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 04:37 AM
1

I really don’t think that women, in general, have a particular attraction for what American men of the internet call “masculinity.” Like the penis size obsession, it’s mostly guys’ insecurities driving the obsession, not women’s preferences. Sure, some women like “alpha” men or giant penises, but it’s really a distraction when it comes to attraction or sexual satisfaction, respectively. Masculinity is in crisis in America. We need better models that better suit men and the women we love and work…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 12:43 AM
1

The numbers are disproportionate, but not quite like that. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/a-profile-of-single-americans/ Looks in many ways like women are just waiting for men to grow up before they get serious with them — something I frequently recommend to young women. Once they hit 30, men’s numbers get much better, though they still don’t hit women’s numbers. The remaining variance might be explained by harem building by some men. I’d be curious to read an actual study …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 08:34 PM
1

I mean, you’re just wrong. My wife gets hit on ALL THE TIME. In the vegetable section of the grocery store, on the subway, on the train, in the hall, on the street, you name it. Often while I’m nearby! Most of the time, she appreciates it and is quite gentle in letting them down. Once in a while, they’re jerks or appear entitled, and she’ll shoot them down hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 07:06 PM
1

I don’t think that’s true, mostly because nice guy behavior (unfortunately for susceptible young men seeking role models) was highly touted in film and popular culture throughout the 80s and 90s. Of course, those films were made by men
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 07:01 PM
0

I agree (though the number of purely heterosexual women is dwindling). But many heterosexual women are very attracted to men who openly and daringly express aspects of their femininity. Especially when that comes from a confidence about their masculinity
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 06:29 PM
2

I’ve spent much of my life seeking to figure out what is good and how to do that. It’s never presented me any problems with dating — just the opposite! Nice guys are guys who do what’s good because they believe that’s what everyone thinks they’re supposed to do, and they’re scared of the consequences if they do otherwise. So they end up not really being good, instead acting like conventional milquetoasts. Because they’re not honest with themselves or others about their desires and dreams. A litt…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 06:26 PM
-1

There’s no contradiction in reality, only in your formulation. Think about it more deeply, and you’ll see
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 06:20 PM
-1

That I have a subtle attraction to my female friends is unambiguous. But I’m not interested in dating any of them. See the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 06:16 PM
2

There’s a small minority of women who act like you describe. But I suppose you’re justified in your concern for them that they will be hurt when their unvoiced expectations are not met. But Chad doesn’t care
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 06:14 PM
2

Couldn’t agree more
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 06:10 PM
1

Just admit that your idea of what makes a man attractive is deeply, desperately in need of empirical revision. I doubt Bowie was sexy because he was wealthy and high status — that hasn’t done wonders for Bill Gates, though I’m sure he has plenty of suitors who don’t really find him sexy. Look around — tons of beautiful women are with guys who are quite feminine, if they do it with confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 05:41 PM
2

Looks matter, but not the way you think. How many women crushed on David Bowie? Or fair metal bands? Or singers with high, sweet voices? Those guys were often highly feminized, and women go crazy for them. It’s about the person, not the features
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 03:48 PM

No, it was never that easy. If you go to the poor, traditional countries where beautiful young women line up to marry fat old duds, as long as they’re white and from the west, you’ll soon realize that there are MANY single men at all ages, who are incapable of marrying because they don’t have enough money. Prostitutes are a comment outlet
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 03:36 PM
1

There’s a lot of women I wouldn’t sleep with. There’s even a lot of very hot women that I wouldn’t sleep with. What’s the point, when you can feel that there’s no chemistry? But your point is still valid
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 01:15 PM
2

I hear women complaining constantly about how all they can find are fuckboys or partnered guys looking for some side action
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 11:57 PM
0

It's not necessary (obviously). But it is among the best ways to: 1) attract quality women, and 2) build great relationships with those women (and everyone else). Why would you want to, if you're already happy? For the same reasons that a happy person might go on a hike, or buy a great knife. Just because you're happy doesn't mean that you won't want to set up the conditions to increase the quality of experiences and relationships in your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 08:08 PM
3

Check out The Untethered Soul. Your mind is an exquisite tool for things like mathematics and music. But most of the churn going on is self-harm. If you stop bothering yourself all the time, many of your biggest problems just disappear
/r/seduction17/07/23 12:42 PM
9

Did you do a study on this? I await the publication
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 03:46 AM
1

OP is absolutely right that kissing says a great deal about how she feels at the moment. And turning the lips away is a definite sign to slow down or retreat — you didn’t get her into the right headspace before you went to kiss. There’s really no formula. But if you can learn to kiss like this, you won’t need to learn a formula: https://youtu.be/ulrxrM8Sldk
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 03:16 AM
2

Start finding ways to be happy with yourself and your life, as it is (which isn’t to say you shouldn’t try to improve your life, but don’t condition your happiness on the results of some as-yet-uncompleted project). Then you’ll find that many women are interested in joining you in your happy life
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 06:59 PM
3

Where are you drawing these conclusions from? I’ve done a ton of dating, and these are not things I’ve ever noticed (though men giggling in a high pitch is quite unusual). Seems like a summary of some lecture by Professor Tate, or something. Because it’s not from experience
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 03:33 PM
1

Which part of this is so controversial in the west? If you moderate the statements a bit, and remove the occasional, sickAnd consequence, they all seem fairly trivial. The “top exceptional man” one just seems silly — what does that even mean? And even those guys don’t have endless options — look at Bezos’ wife. But mostly unexceptional statements
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 11:05 PM
1

I wouldn’t say they’re inextricably mixed in almost any cases (parents, typically, and close friends, sometimes). But most people, especially men, have trouble separating them in opposite sex relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 03:32 PM
1

I’ve long been led to understand that sex workers are predominantly in the male care business, and less so in the sex business. That’s confirmed, somewhat, by this fascinating video investigation https://youtu.be/eHlDo3Zj_58
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 06:03 AM
2

New practice — start little conversations with random people. Learn to enjoy it
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 05:46 AM

Truth
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 09:28 PM
1

Women date men who know their desire and pursue it. They date men who respect and appreciate them, and also treat them like sexual toys when that’s what they want. They date men who have the confidence to know themselves and their weaknesses, but don’t make a big deal about it. They date men who can cry at a sad movie, or the death of their grandmother, or because they’re having a vulnerable conversation without blaming and victimizing. Nobody really likes someone who is stewing in resentment, o…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 09:27 PM
3

Cold approach is fine. Just approach women you find attractive like you’d approach every other human being, but with a touch of spice. I’d recommend talking with men and women you’re not interested in, at least as often as women you’re interested in. Just get the hang of talking to strangers. A few women will be miffed, lots will just blow you off or be otherwise indifferent, a handful will have an interesting conversation, some will show interest, but you’ll discover you’re not interested and a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 09:17 PM
1

Ok, as Barbara Carellas notes, there’s those who want to be right, and those who want to be happy. I’m happy, and that’s how I know I’m right about this one
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 08:23 PM
2

I never wanted for a beautiful woman on my arm, let me assure you. The thing is that I speak with women as people, first. I’m not trying to bag them, like a big game hunter. I’m hoping to appreciate the flowering of their being, and to enjoy myself in the process. If we both get hot during the interaction, then I move things further. For me, almost every interaction is a success. And in the process I sometimes find amazing women who have incredible chemistry with me. If you think a spreadsheet a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 07:55 PM
2

I think you’re not reading very well. But it’s ok. I long ago learned to recognized people who are dedicated to their self-imposed misery. Hopefully other young men can read this, before they entrench themselves so deeply in resentment
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 07:31 PM
0

What kind of nonsense are you talking? I’ve been rejected 20 times for every woman who’s given me a good response. Who cares? The problem is when you get all obsessed with girl X. Just go out and connect, and if there’s a connection back, tend it with care and delicacy (and increasing passion). Maybe it flowers, or even fruits?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 04:51 PM
1

College is not a time to learn cold approaches. Just go to parties and use your friend groups
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 02:28 PM
-4

The risk is basically zero. The reward is a lifetime of joy with a woman who understands and appreciates you. Get out of your head, and you'll see more clearly
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 02:26 PM

This is entirely true. Gird up your loins, boys -- women want to be approached in a non-predatory, engaged way. Humor and insight helps, but do your thing. If there's sparks, ask if they'd like to meet for coffee, or go to event X, or for their IG or number or whatever. If not, enjoy a human interaction and try to leave them feeling a little better about men and the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 02:25 PM
3

Vulnerable and open does not imply unconfident and weak. Be vulnerable and open from a sense of surfeit of strength and confidence. To paraphrase Nietzsche: make of your life a joy to behold, a path of full-hearted yeses.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 01:19 AM
1

If they’re looking on apps, maybe 20%. In real life, closer to 80%
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 06:16 PM
1

These factors are super important for OLD, but don’t matter that much in real life. Most women want a man who’s taller than them, but beyond that height is just a little boost. Mostly women like real men because they tend to be confident and centered. It seems likely that your survey of the opinions female doctors of regarding colleagues of different heights misses something. You assume that the only relevante difference is the height. But it seems much more likely that the shorter doctor acts a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 09:56 AM
1

What makes life-long marriage and king term relationships solemn? Answer that question, and you’ll see why those ideas no longer have the credibility they once had
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 11:47 PM

Bars and clubs can be tough in different ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 05:50 PM
1

Height matters much more in theory than in practice. Get off the apps
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 03:19 PM
1

Meh. Gym obsession is weird. But I love women who look great, and publicly delight in their figure. I wish American men would take a lesson and learn to dress themselves with style.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 06:03 PM
4

Sounds like the thing luring guys to their doom is their stupid ideas about what girls want. Stop believing the nonsense theories that guys tell you about girls. Get out of your head, and start paying attention to women. Like, really paying attention to individual women that you’re engaging with. Try to turn them on, try to make them feel amused and comfortable. It’s an empirical matter, and you need to test things out and pay attention to a persons actual responses.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 11:39 PM
3

I suppose. But they’re not with that guy, are they? Besides, maybe guys should up their skills and develop real care for the woman’s pleasure and well-being, instead of hoping that their girlfriends will be too ignorant to notice
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 11:29 PM
18

First, find a way to be basically happy with yourself and your situation. Then, look for someone who is also basically happy. Drop the checklist. Don’t use apps, if you can help it. Look for guys that share your interests, have kind eyes, and turn you on. Do you get aroused by their smell? Your nose is a better guide to relationship satisfaction than your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 10:48 PM
1

Nobody like rejection. One of the most beautiful women I ever dated was not very into me until I told her we didn’t have good chemistry. I don’t think anyone has ever rejected her before, and she became obsessed for months.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 06:32 PM
7

I’m a man, and I don’t understand most of these worries about women who have had many partners. Women, like men, can have all kinds of problems. Very, very few of those have anything to do with her prior sexual experience. And there’s many virtues to a woman who knows her body and her way in bed. I do understand that, if you’re a very inexperienced and unskilled lover, an experienced woman can be intimidating
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 11:59 AM
1

Here’s an insightful definition, and helpful explanation for why “nice guy” behavior has gotten a bad reputation. https://open.spotify.com/episode/4np1g9U29vB3LPLampn4ln?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 08:59 PM

This Is the rare, sound advice on this sub that actually comports with experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 05:02 PM
1

Sure, there’s plenty of beautiful 16 year olds or 20 year old, or whatever. And lots of beautiful 25 or 30 or 35 or 40 year olds. There’s even many beautiful 45 or 50 or 55 year olds. Some people prefer the spring, some the summer, some the fall. Anyone who’s claiming its biology is simply making things up. While there’s some relationship between sexual attraction and fertility and youth, it’s not remotely as binary or simple as many pretend
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 09:52 AM
1

It’s the men who stay in rural areas that fetishize a traditionalist past that they would not have enjoyed. The women go to cities, and generally lean left.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 09:35 AM
2

Men need to start getting comfortable in relationships with hot women who have better jobs and make more money than them. Make yourselves useful, and get over the loss of privilege
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 12:38 AM
2

The whole traditionalist idea of masculinity, which is really a weird derivation from the quasi-naturalist definitions like “alpha,” Is totally looney toons. The whole alpha thing is a weak shadow of genuine, confident masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 06:06 PM
1

They can’t tell if you’re a virgin. They can tell whether you’re likely to be a good lover, though. A good lover knows what he wants and how to get it. A good lover is aware of his senses, has some knowledge of techniques that often give pleasure to women, he uses his body like an instrument, and is highly attuned to the responses of his partner — looking in her eyes and reading her emotions frequently, attending to her bodily reactions like goosebumps, hardened nipples, a wet pussy — all so tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 10:14 PM

I’m not trying to gain anything. I feel compassion for the people lost in the weeds, and would like to show them some ways out
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 08:00 PM
1

I’ve done it hundreds of times. But you can’t just approach. There usually needs to be a common, external focus — something annoying or amusing or interesting. And don’t start out trying to get laid — just try to make a connection with another human being. If there’s chemistry, turn up the heat.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 05:25 AM
1

It’s because they have meaningful friends and some yearn for sex the same way
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 04:51 AM

The problem isn’t women. I believe it’s American culture’s failure to cultivate men who are emotionally and intellectually whole and capable of connecting deeply with women. And then the recent dependence on apps exponentially increases the problem. Because, while women DON’T care soooo much about how good looking a guy is, they’re generally picky. So if all you give them is pictures, they’ll get VERY picky.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 02:37 PM
1

Definitely not. In the average woman, I think she’s most beautiful at 27. But that’s partially because she’s woman enough to know her body and her desire, but not quite old enough to start worrying much about having children. Many women become more beautiful in their thirties. 40s can often be tough, but certainly not always
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 09:37 PM
1

That’s fine, but they should be converting to some kind of fundamentalist faith. Because, outside of women who have been brainwashed by some fundamentalist religion since birth, there aren’t a ton of women looking for that nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 10:31 AM
1

It’s absurd to ask for a woman with a low body count, unless you’re really low confidence. In which case, you’re probably not in much of a position to ask for anything — you should be grateful for what you can get
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 10:27 AM

Not at all. Alpha is a simplistic and ill-fitting hierarchy pretending to describe the rank of all human men. It’s a sad ideology that leads a American men who feel marginalized to puff their chests and wear a lot of camouflage and jackboots to cover their paunch. Courage is a classical virtue whose cultivation helps support an excellent life. Aristotle would laugh at the feeble ideology of Alpha, let alone that Alpha is synonymous with courage. Check out the Nichomachean ethics for a much riche…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 06:04 PM
1

But alpha/beta isn't real. It's just an interpretation you're layering onto the facts, and not a very fitting interpretation. What's real is that some men are courageous, and others are cowards
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 04:49 AM

I'm saying that American culture is damning American men. First, it trains them to act like spoiled children who deserve everything they want. Then it trains them to dress and act like overgrown toddlers -- all camo and alpha and super-heroes, while walking around in dirty sneakers, eating crappy food, tottering about like a pre-schooler. You can tell an american man from a block away, in Europe. Then, when women find them distasteful, America trains the men to cultivate their resentments rather…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 04:28 AM
5

I don’t think it is much to do with the men being ugly or overrating their appearance. I suspect it has more to do with young American men acting like children and watching porn all day, then wanting models when they can’t make it to the gym once a week.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 08:29 PM
1

I think that’s largely true. I do have a wonderful friend with ASD. Despite being a genuinely lovely human being, and very bright, he has a terrible time with women for the reasons described. But he’s since married a wonderful woman with ASD, and they even have a son.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 11:02 PM
1

That directly contradicts the evidence I see on the street, every day
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 08:37 PM
1

No, that was just serving as evidence. But I get that there's no ethos in an anonymous forum. I'm talking about the reality of women, who they are and how they behave. But given your ideological fragility regarding women, I suspect your conceptual blinders apply to a much more extensive realm of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 07:53 PM
1

Again, your theory is gumming up your ability to perceive reality clearly
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 07:31 PM
6

Believe it or not, doesn't matter to me. I bang a model-hot woman a few times a week -- my wife. I'm smart, charming, good looking, and I live in NYC where there's an abundance of beautiful women. Honestly, I've certainly had sex with a handful of 9s, and had amazing sex with plenty of other women (being a 9 isn't exactly a major criteria for me, though the woman needs to have fire and feel it in her body). But I've been rejected hundreds of times by women of all sorts, who did not have boyfrien…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 07:07 PM
3

Jesus, you're insane. Women like hot guys, but hotness for women is much more about the feeling they have while they're around the guy. Being tall or whatever may be conditions conducive to that feeling, but they're neither necessary nor sufficient. I've dated a number of women who were model-level hot. With some of them, we had amazing sex, with others it was so-so. The most objectively hot women I've slept with, and she was considerably younger and brilliant, too, was someone who checked all m…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 06:57 PM
46

It’s VERY hard for most people to lose weight and keep it off. While I’m all for reasonable body positivity, we need to focus strongly on preventing children under 18 from becoming overweight.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 08:11 PM
1

Wonderful — you’ve learned to seduce! Now it’s time to learn to have mind-blowing sex. At the same time, learn to build high-communication, high-bond, high-trust love relationships.
/r/seduction21/06/23 02:12 PM
1

Look around, dude. The vast majority of women date below their level
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 08:07 PM
2

This is one of the first sensible things I’ve read on this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 02:43 PM
1

Hmm, I don’t think your conclusion is valid. Can you spell out the syllogism, so I can see how my logic unfolds?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 04:33 PM
4

No kidding — there’s way, WAY more decent and competent, emotionally stable women in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 12:42 PM
1

More baseless speculation from the Department of Theoretical Resentments
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 08:13 PM

Hey, it’s your choice to go on complaining, or to see through the BS your mind is spewing out to protect you from your perceived injury. We both know which path leads where you want to go, but that doesn’t mean it’s easy
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 06:24 PM

Nobody, least of all your female “friend,” wants you to continue hanging around with the attitude you’re showing here. Clearly it’s better for everyone if you move on. But that’s hardly a mark of emotional maturity
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 05:55 PM
-2

So you made a friend. Then you got a crush on your friend. Then you hung around hoping she’d notice your crush for a while. Then you asked her for a hook-up. She rejected your advance. And now you want to stop being her friend. Sure, as long as you’re not harming her, you’re not doing anything seriously unethical. But nobody’s going to give you any applauds. And you’ve basically just demonstrated, again, why many women feel that guys make shitty friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 05:26 PM
1

You’re complaining. Maybe you’d like to figure out how to do it better
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 05:16 PM
1

Did you listen to the podcast? Are you here to learn to do better so you enjoy life and suffer less? Or do you just want to complain?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 04:26 PM
1

This is a very perceptive critique of “nice guys,” from a woman who’s very sympathetic to men and is looking to help them do better. https://open.spotify.com/episode/4np1g9U29vB3LPLampn4ln?si=qHL59myzSZqD3MVZ1-yqyQ
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 12:26 PM
3

You think that’s what you want, and you’re pursuing it legally and ethically — have at it! But that doesn’t make the ideology any less idiotic. And if you’re going around making internet arguments in favor of your bogus ideology, why shouldn’t others push-back?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 01:54 PM
2

That’s a pretty extreme position that’s not very common. I’ve complimented women many, many times, and rarely get anything worse than an odd look. The key is instrumentalization. If women feel that a guy is looking at them as an object to satisfy desire, they generally find it creepy. If a guy looks at a woman as a human being whose character and features arouse them, then compliments and interactions are usually welcome, or at least not creepy.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 06:33 PM

But the competition isn’t actually that stiff — most things that people had to fight to get in the past are now easily accessible, including meaningful sex. It’s harder to get into Harvard, but you weren’t getting into Harvard in the past, either, unless you were an upper class East coast white guy. Still, there’s a perception of global competition that is enough to paralyze a certain subset of people, especially young men without much experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/23 05:19 PM
1

Check out this podcast. She’s a friend to men, and genuinely wants to help them do it better. https://open.spotify.com/show/0lM5EjGKbQ8BpOGuV9E8TP?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/23 02:30 AM
1

Have passionate, intimate sex with woman you have sex with. Why would you do anything else?
/r/seduction11/06/23 02:26 AM
35

Judging by this sub, men can and do complain about nearly everything. Ad nauseum
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 10:19 PM
3

It’s an American thing, in part. But also, it might well be that you’re getting too serious, too fast. Women generally want someone who’s emotionally vulnerable, but they want it to come from centered strength, not from neediness.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 06:13 PM
2

Money doesn’t make a man more attractive (at least not for long). But, as any person who’s had a job will tell you, most people will exchange some of their liberty for monetary security. How much liberty they will sacrifice depends a lot on the person and the norms of the society.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 01:01 PM
9

Only a fool rails against nature. But more foolish still is to pretend to know nature, where one has only vague guesses and idle speculation
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 12:57 PM
2

Attraction is essential. But people who focus too much on looks miss the big picture — it’s really more about smell
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 02:37 AM
1

I tell men to learn from their mistakes and choose better next time, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 08:42 PM
3

That’s a good part of the reason that women often don’t like ONS. But it doesn’t have to be that way
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 02:34 PM
5

Casual sex with passion and care for the other is a beautiful thing and wonderful opportunity to share pleasure and help each other grow
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 12:07 PM
3

Resentment and reactionary policies are destroying this country
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 12:01 PM
1

Another loser theory about the top 10% of men, or whatever. Some women have responsive desire (I’d argue most women do). That means they need to be seduced — you have to learn to make them aroused. Most American men, once they get married, seem to do little and easy a lot. They stop dressing nicely, they stop buying flowers and doing special things. They stop expressing their desire for their wife. And, frankly, they never learn to be satisfactory lovers, let alone exceptional lovers. The wives …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 12:28 AM
1

But it kind of depends, doesn’t it? I’ve been in some age gap relationships (from both sides of the gap), and the hot body was never more than the whipped cream on top — nice, but hardly the reason either of us liked the other..
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 12:18 AM
2

Ok, what’s the phenomena that your speculation is trying to explain, and how is that substantively different from my paraphrase?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 11:14 PM
2

Why are you wasting your time on this kind of speculation? Of course women tend to prefer more graceful and successful guys. And they tend not to get hot over socially awkward guys. Why? We’ll, a lot of reasons, surely. But a major one is probably that it’s often no fun spending time around people who don’t pay attention to you or others around them. It’s like asking why musicians who prefer to play with other musicians who are skilled and whose instruments are in tune.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 10:28 PM

No, but the general culture has had enough of the selfish, thoughtless habits that previous generations taught boys were an important part of masculinity. Time to get better
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 03:42 PM
1

I’ll speak for myself — I’m not really someone who finds quantitative measures helpful in relationships. So no, I don’t seek that. But generally, the smarter, more cultured and more dynamic and more sexual and more powerful and more income the woman is, the better, everything else being equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 06:14 PM
2

I think they’re not having sex because there’s a general sense of disgust with men and the gross, transactional nature of so much dating. And the Red Pill is the quintessence of transactional approaches to dating. Honestly, I don’t understand why ask the Red Pill guys don’t just go for sugar babies. If you want transactional sexual relationships, find someone who wants to provide that to you, and stop poisoning the rest of us with your resentment
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 03:56 PM
3

I have never, in my middle aged life, been in a position where I felt remotely compelled to tell anyone whether I was a virgin or not. I’m not saying all virgins act that way. It takes some people longer than others to get comfortable with themselves, their bodies and sexuality, and the opposite sex. But the ones who talk about it all the time, and especially the ones blaming women and the world (of whom there are many online), have a very bad reputation. And justifiably! I cannot imagine why a …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 05:38 PM
8

Nobody really cares if you’re a virgin, except you. The problem with virgins is when they won’t shut up about how unfair women and the world are to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 03:54 PM

I’ve always been quite open with my emotions. I cry in front of my girlfriends, and now my wife, with some regularity. It’s never been any kind of problem, at all. Just the opposite — increased vulnerability has always led to increased intimacy. And I’m a fairly dominant guy, who usually has dated very beautiful, strong women with a deep submissive streak. I highly doubt that most women, or even a substantial minority of women, would lose respect for a man for crying, per se. I suspect the probl…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 02:30 PM
1

This is nonsense. Get out of your head and look around without filtering everything through your wacky theory
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/23 03:18 PM
1

I wouldn’t like for details of my date to be shared with thousands online. But that doesn’t seem fundamentally different from my experience growing up in a small town where word spreads instantaneously and your reputation is everything. Moreover, the fact that I don’t like for people to gossip about me doesn’t mean that it should be illegal for people to gossip about me, particularly when there’s a strong interest among women in knowing the kind of guy they might be dating. So you’re saying that…
/r/MensRights30/05/23 12:16 AM
1

So what is the thing that should rightfully be private but is being disclosed here? The men can certainly receive compensation, if they can prove the libel occurred and they can demonstrate damage to their reputation.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 04:55 PM
0

Wait, which part should be illegal? You think you have a right to privacy, but the conservative Supreme Court has rejected such a right. Still, let’s say you have a “Natural right” to privacy. Does that mean people should not allowed to speak about you or write about you in public forums? Of course, it should be illegal to write or say false things about someone and damage their reputation. But it already is — that’s called libel or slander. So victims have recourse to challenge lies and receive…
/r/MensRights29/05/23 11:21 AM
-3

Why? What do they do that’s so bad?
/r/MensRights29/05/23 01:57 AM
-8

You thought you were living in a big city, and it turns out you’re in a small town, at least when it comes to dating. Treat women with deep respect, as they deserve, and it shouldn’t be much of a problem
/r/MensRights28/05/23 04:27 PM

“She’s into you” just means there’s a baseline of interest. It means you have an opportunity to move forward, if you don’t scare it up. It doesn’t man she likes you more than everyone else, or she wants to sleep with you, or she wants to marry you, or she wants to meet your parents, or have your babies, etc. It just means you haven’t been excluded, yet. Take your time, respect and love women deeply as human beings, don’t be afraid to make mistakes, and you’ll get better at it. Americans aren’t c…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/23 04:14 PM
1

In my experience, many women LOVE to be treated like a piece of meat. But usually only when it’s within the larger context of a man’s deep care and respect for the woman as a full human being. Men don’t want to be treated like meat — they want to be worshipped like gods. But then they don’t put in any effort to become godlike.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 02:01 PM
6

America has such incredible wealth. One can live very well in the USA without working very much, if they don’t get seduced by the American need to have giant living spaces and giant cars and tons of things to fill up all that empty space
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 01:48 PM
2

Jesus, can we stop obsessing over all this stuff!?! Look around — there’s lots of people who are married or in long term relationships. Very few of those people are super hot by any conventional standard. Clearly, it’s far from impossible to find a stable partner, regardless of looks. Now if you’re obsessing with Instagram models or the It girl at school, or whatever, then yes. You’ll probably need to be exceptional in a few ways to get a date, let alone a relationship. But is that really a trut…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/23 11:21 AM
1

Not surprising. Many women enjoy being dominated and used, if it’s done with care.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 05:30 PM
2

Anyone can accuse anyone else of anything. Convincing a jury is much harder
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/23 04:29 PM
-2

This is just looney. You sound like a whiner. Modern men gave more power than men of any previous period. But they piss it all away complaining instead of getting to work
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 12:09 PM
1

Red Pill is a cluster of resentments that’s billed as a theory of the sexes and spends its time searching for confirming evidence
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 12:11 PM
2

That just doesn’t comport with experience. Seems like a theory built to support an already-existent conclusion, not an actual inference from experience. Most of the masculine, dominant guys I know are in small towns in the Midwest. They’re doing ok, I guess, but nothing social after the High School glory days. On the other hand, the men I know who are with really amazing, beautiful women at are all kinds, but mostly soft spoken and fairly gentle in character, and not at all a Chad (though also n…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 04:04 PM
0

Yeah, everything u/lolgobbz said. Waitressing is a much more physically demanding job. It’s also much more emotionally exhausting — you need to deal with people making immediate demands on you all day, often using you to satisfy their dissatisfaction regarding their placement in the pecking order. And the work-day stress is much higher. There’s a lot more ways it’s harder, honestly. And, obviously, in some ways waiting tables is easier. But, in case you find my claim unlikely, just ask people — …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 12:36 PM
9

Have you ever waited tables in an expensive restaurant? That’s a super-hard job, much harder than banking or whatever. And nobody gets rich doing those jobs, though it’s possible to be comfortable. Nevertheless, it’s definitely easier for beautiful women to get certain jobs. Which is better than nothing, since they get discriminated against like crazy in most intellectually challenging jobs
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 01:30 AM
3

This woman only was shown to have driven her boyfriend to the drug house a few times. She doesn’t seem to have been a leader of the operation in any way, but was instead the girlfriend of the leader. In what bizarro world would it make sense to give her a comparable sentence?
/r/MensRights19/05/23 11:43 AM
1

This is one of the first interesting takes I’ve seen on this sub. It’s not based in resentment or grievance, or the nonsense “traditionalist” philosophies that grow from such grievance.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/23 11:58 AM
0

Your presuppositions are false. I once picked up an incredibly beautiful, brilliant woman, leading to a 2 month summer fling, by talking about how men cry and how that’s a demonstration of strength. Just because a bunch of naive boys made a meme about something doesn’t mean it’s true.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 11:35 AM
3

This is just all so weird. Indeed, most women like a guy who takes care of his body and has a good figure. That’s not some secret mystery red pill stuff, that’s just common sense. And you don’t need to hide that fact from a girl. Why should you be embarrassed that you’re trying to make yourself attractive? Nevertheless, talking about it is just in bad taste, and likely to provoke a negative reaction— why do that? So no one will think your red pill if you talk about excruciating so that you’re ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/23 01:12 AM
4

JP has gone on record, extensively, as a person who knows so well how to live life that he’s going to guide other people (boys) on how to do it. The apparent misery of his life is thus very relevant to his standing as a public intellectual
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 05:54 PM
2

Approach hasn’t been demonized. Like always, it’s received better by side than others, and depends a great deal on the way you go about it
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 03:37 PM
3

Why would you care?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 02:40 AM

QED /s Dude, your virgin purity fetish is showing. Don’t try to smear it all over me. The bodycount is all in your head. Women are not fungible commodities. Quantitative comparisons reveal next to nothing. You fuck person, with her own consciousness and preferences and ideas and history. And, if things go well, you end up in a relationship with a person. There is inexhaustible depth to everyone. But you can to find someone you’d like to explore for a lifetime, and who feels that way about you. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 08:05 PM
-1

You should use your mind to tear down the walls of your socially-constructed prison, not build the walls higher. Most of what you're saying is about 30% true. Which means it's 70% false. These kinds of social phenomena are far too fuzzy and complex to be accurately theorized. Let go of your smart ideas, and go out there and talk to women. Just try to have some respect for them as people when you're doing so
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 05:45 PM
1

That's nonsense. Anyone could accuse you of anything, anytime. If you talk to a woman, even ask her for her number or for a date, you're fine. The problem would be if she doesn't respond, or responds negatively, and you persist. That's harassment. So don't harass her.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 05:26 PM
1

It doesn't matter when you learn to date and seduce. It's always a little awkward, until you do it enough that you get comfortable with it. These days, with the internet and all that, I think there's many people in their mid-20s who have never really dated IRL. Just start going for it, making a fool of yourself, laughing about it, and moving on to try again. Treat everyone with deep respect for their humanity, and otherwise forget all the "rules."
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 05:09 PM
5

Jesus Christ, man! Sapiosexual means they prefer to fuck smart people who can and do engage in extended, two way conversations about meaningful topics. Maybe they even like nerds who fuck. Get out there
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/23 01:51 PM
0

Bad boys do pretty well. But female sexual arousal is 1000x more complex and subtle and diverse than RP people think. RP’s masculine ideals seem to derive from a bunch of basement dwellers watching too much porn and superhero flicks. I agree completely that it’s very important to be able to get the woman wet that you’re seducing, or are in a LT relationship with. That’s like second priority, after appreciation of her humanity and autonomy. But the ridiculous formula that RP people believe arouse…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/23 07:33 PM
1

Totally agree. This RP stuff, and so much of sexual/dating norms in the US, are completely made up bullshit. People should date widely, and learn to trust their gut. Life is not a video game
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/23 01:31 PM
0

Having a man who can easily get laid does not, generally, make a woman more secure in her relationship. It might make her feel good about herself that he keeps picking her, but the inherent risk causes some worry and instability.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 12:25 PM
4

Under what magical circumstances do a large percentage of women start spewing hate and shame to a man over DMs? I can’t imagine any that don’t include the man first being a total douche. Yet a large percentage of men seem to do it, just because their sexual advances were rejected
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 12:40 PM
2

Indeed, and some people need to learn how to earn it, apparently
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:49 PM
1

I LOVE when my wife goes out in revealing clothes. Obviously, it's most fun when we're together, but I even enjoy her going out on her own in very slutty clothes (to the extent I believe she'll be safe, of course). Over the time of our marriage, we've gotten to the point where she almost never wears panties while with me, and typically wears hot-pants or mini-skirts. Such a joy. If you want to have a boundary that says your girlfriend can't wear revealing clothes, then enforcement of that bounda…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 04:17 PM
1

Existence precedes essence
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 07:14 PM
7

The levels of compounded resentment fueling this misogynistic screed are innumerable. It’s such a bad argument, so completely divorced from anything but the collective imagination of so many lonely young men, that it’s not worth arguing about. Go talk to some real people, in real life. And more than taking, try listening
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 01:30 AM
-2

They don’t! It’s quite rare. In fact, of the people with whom I have direct experience and can speak with some confidence, there’s almost twice as many women who have been sexually assaulted as men who have been falsely accused of some kind of sexual assault. And only one of those false accusations ever made it into a police report, so it was mostly just a bit of reputational damage and threats to the guy. Similarly, I don’t know ANY women who have successfully reported sexual assault to the pol…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 07:00 PM

Yeah, that’s entirely true for online dating. But, in the real world, intelligence and ambition are hot to women, as long as the smart, ambitious guy isn’t a bore or socially inappropriate/immature. It’s just that smart, ambitious guys are too often self-absorbed gamers with a bunch of ideas and not a lot of follow through.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 01:39 PM
1

How about working to make yourself an excellent lover and decent human being that can have a genuine, mutually beneficial relationship with someone? Who cares whether you get married
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 12:38 PM
3

Maybe the problem is that American masculinity is a deeply flawed norm? We should be working hard to shape new, better norms of masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 11:54 AM
1

It seems fair to say that American culture has rendered femininity toxic. And it's rendered masculinity even more toxic. Just look at the stupid examples in our stupid movies
/r/MensRights11/04/23 02:41 PM
2

I approach women all the time, in the wild. I’m happily married, and would never get their numbers or ask for a date or anything. But I engage in a little small talk and light flirtation. I’m a smart, handsome guy, and I’m sure that helps a lot. But I get very good responses
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 04:06 PM
1

Accept that not everyone is going to love you, some will criticize you no matter what you do. That’s the reality of human society. Then be your best self, and go talk to women. Pay attention to them, try to enjoy their enjoyment, and cultivate it. If you’re having fun after five minutes, ask her for coffee or something. It’s really not that hard
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 02:43 AM
3

Absolutely. We don’t need a higher birthdate in the US — the world has too many people, and the US can always increase immigration. But women of means should be freed from the conception that having a child requires the consistent participation of a man. Men aren’t really needed for much, and they’re often little better than another child for the woman to tend to. Obviously, conception is relatively simple. Raising children is harder. People can band together to raise children outside of sexual …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 06:24 PM
1

Right. And my response is that you’re analogy sucks, because: 1) women are sexually assaulted by men far more often than men are falsely accused by women. So the likelihood of half is much smaller for men 2) sexual assault is much worse than false accusations, especially since many people don’t believe a woman’s accusations against a man, whether true or false. 3) False accusations almost universally come from angry, former sexual partners. One can largely avoid false accusations by working hard…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:42 PM
1

?!? I’m not aware of anyone who supports women making false accusations against men. Or of anyone making false accusations against anyone else. That’s literally one of the most universally despised actions, possible, in nearly every society.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:25 PM
-1

Not a great response on her part. But false accusations are vastly less common than sexual assault. It's a bit like asking if you should be worried about women because most of the people cutting off penises are women.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 11:55 PM
0

I love liberated women. Especially submissive ones
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/23 05:58 PM
-2

There's plenty to hate about the current culture of masculinity. Personally, I have sympathy for (and deep experience with) the plight of post-modern men, trapped in a ridiculous cultural cage that cuts off kindness and connection, and seeks to blame others rather than find ways to build and change and improve.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 04:55 AM
1

You need a lawyer. Tell them the facts, and what you want to happen. She is likely required to split the proceeds from sale of the house
/r/MensRights01/01/23 04:42 PM
-1

Rates of SA are even between men and women?!? I find that VERY hard to believe. For one thing, the perpetrators of SA are almost entirely men, and homosexual men are, at most, 10% of the population.
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 12:45 PM
-10

American men often behave like spoiled children until long after the time has come to grow up.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 12:55 AM
1

You just don’t ever meet such extreme cases in the wild. So the right response seems to be too suggest that the idea is ludicrous and not remotely representative of feminists, rather than to condemn the idea.
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/22 05:14 PM
-8

Anyone who thinks that more than a small handful of feminists think “kill all men” is a good idea, or even a clever provocation, needs to meet more actual women and talk to them like human beings
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 05:59 PM
-8

American femininity is dry and hyper-rationalized. Still better than American masculinity, though
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/22 01:52 PM
0

Are some guys really so dense that you think this is hypocrisy? Obviously, the two situations are meaningfully different
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 02:21 PM
1

Maybe instead of “The same amount of energy” devoted to the problems, it should be proportional amounts of energy. Which is probably about the amount that get devoted to the two problems, in fact
/r/AntiFeminists03/12/22 08:57 PM
2

Are these actually western women?
/r/AntiFeminists03/12/22 06:21 PM
-17

If I hadn’t already learned to bea great lover, and to make my girl cum and cum, then I’d be very concerned about letting her sleep with other men. That said, some guys are into humiliation!
/r/AntiFeminists02/12/22 03:24 PM
1

I don't know about you, but I really like f*cking. The more the merrier, if they're hot
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/22 04:56 PM
-6

Prostitution is often a form of care giving. So is stripping — most of those lonely fucks on the barstool at the club are really just seeking caring touch. As for the guy, he seems to know it’s normal to feel jealous. But he’s in love with the girl, and she’s chosen to be a sex worker. Maybe she’s a porn star? That wouldn’t be caring, but it’s gotta be tough for him. He should leave, or persuade her to quit. But if he doesn’t want to do the former, and can’t do the latter, he might as well learn…
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/22 11:50 PM
1

What!?! I’ve literally never heard of any feminist saying or writing that men can’t experience trauma. There might be some really crazy person who said that, somewhere, but kind of I doubt it. Why not try to critique actual problems with feminism in a broader sense that’s accepted by more than a small handful of people? Just putting up straw men and knocking them down is easy, but futile and only serves to make you feel angry and self-righteous.
/r/AntiFeminists20/11/22 07:45 PM
1

We each know where the shoe pinches. That said, her criticism isn’t wrong. The profound alienation of so many young men, and the objectification of women as mere objects to serve men’s pleasure, has much to do with the flood of porn into their developing brains. Why do Americans watch so much more porn than anyone else? My suspicion is that its because we’re ashamed of sensuality and sexuality, so restrict it to our darkened rooms. Young men would learn much better lessons about seduction and se…
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/22 01:21 PM
2

Not at all afraid. But I’m saying your inference is bogus. First, it’s far from clear that this is not a fake account, so why would I be confident it was written by a woman. Second, even if it is real, there’s nothing about her lousy opinion which has anything significant to do with her claiming to be a feminist. No more than her opinion has anything to do with her being an Indian.
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 05:24 PM
-2

You mean that it’s written by someone claiming to be an Indian person?
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 05:02 PM
-5

What’s this have to do with feminism? Seems like this is just a person recommending that other people act like scumbags. People have cheated on spouses and lied about it for at least as long as people have been getting married
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 11:28 AM
0

It’s clearly a joke
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/22 03:47 AM
4

You don’t see a great deal of hatred for women in pages like this?
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/22 12:02 AM
0

Are you mocking my argument?!?
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/22 05:27 PM
2

"if a man can't answer on the stuff he is making presentation about, he's an idiot," would be true if it were normal questions that one might expect to arise in the expected audience. But literally any presentation can be thrown off by a bad-faith questioner who has substantial subject matter expertise. And if the presenter is not a subject matter expert, then one can just research all kinds of super obscure, weird details that aren't particularly relevant to the larger presentation.
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/22 03:22 PM
1

I sure do get to decide whether his response was appropriate or not! And I also get to argue for why my judgment is the best one. Just like you do. If you think this kind of response is appropriate, or that it's good for anyone, it's no surprise that you're so mad at feminists. Imagine if every time a man talked down to a woman while she was doing a presentation, she spent days planning and executing an elaborate revenge plot that left the guy publicly humiliated and crying in front of everyone.…
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/22 03:12 PM
2

I mean, she probably spent 8 seconds "mocking" his presentation. A proportional response would have been justified, perhaps.
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/22 02:49 PM
-6

Absolutely! Assuming he's speaking accurately and not exaggerating her mere criticisms of his presentation, her behavior deserves criticism. And if her ridicule were the end of the story, it might be an example of how not to treat people. But then our man goes on a four day bender of planning for vengeance. He thinks out how he can hurt her, does research to learn her subject, then studies it in such a way to maximize her pain. The whole thing is utterly depressing, frankly kind of scary, and ex…
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/22 04:01 AM
-4

I don't know, I personally hold women responsible for things all the time. And everybody around me does that, too. Guys talk over everyone and put down presenters, all the time. And they should be criticized for that. And it's just as wrong if a woman is insulting or ridiculing some guy who's doing his best to give a good presentation, even if he's not doing a good job of it. ​ If she's just giving negative feedback, and not great at it, then she might just need to improve her feedback-giving-sk…
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/22 03:51 AM
-18

She criticized his presentation, and he spent four days trying to figure out how to completely humiliate her in public. I mean, I don’t know what she said, and maybe it was truly awful. But from the facts presented, this guy comes off like a demented loser. He’d have been better off spending those four days figuring out how to give a kick-ass presentation.
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/22 02:45 AM
-10

Why would anyone assume this is a woman writing? Seems more likely to be a man, given the language use. In particular, my money is on it being a man working multiple accounts to try to stir up resentment and discord in English speaking countries by saying preposterous things that a few people take seriously for some reason.
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/22 02:29 PM
0

That is preposterous. Nobody has any reason to worry about getting prosecuted by the state for standing near a woman or complimenting her, unless the person was standing next to her with his cock in his hand, or complimenting her while holding her at knife point. A superior might lose his job for an off-color compliment or comment, but only if he was already in a precarious position. It’s really not a thing that happens.
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/22 05:02 AM
-3

This is obviously a fake story. Why are you guys so obsessed with your victimhood?
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/22 12:39 AM
0

It’s really not a common claim among feminists. I’d be surprised if you could find a SINGLE instance of a non-satirical feminist claiming that the oppression of women was similar in scope and intensity to the oppression of slaves in the antebellum south. That said, “ownership” is not a simple term. In the sense in which “property” OS used in US law, for instance, it would be entirely fair to say that both Victorian women and US slaves were property, while still being able to maintain that the ca…
/r/AntiFeminists03/11/22 05:52 PM
2

There’s degrees of systematic oppression! No one ever claimed women were historically as oppressed as slaves in the antebellum South. Again, women are 50% of the population, and the mothers of everyone. The oppression is clear from the fact that women were excluded from nearly all positions of authority and official decision making roles. But that doesn’t mean they were without any say in anything!
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/22 11:26 PM
2

What is the corruption in third wave feminism? I love it
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/22 09:18 PM
0

"If ancient Rome was a Patriarchy, in the sense that feminists mean, then neither the Roman not Sabine men would have paid any heed to a bunch of wailing women. Rather, then as now, the men wanted to keep their wives and daughters safe and happy and took their opinions in to account." What a bogus proposition. One can systematically oppress a class of people while still nominally considering their opinions. If you never consider their opinions, it's awfully hard to keep them under your thumb, es…
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/22 08:49 PM
3

What's the source for this information about 1/6 boys vs 1/4 girls? I find this hard to believe, though it's not impossible. Usually, information from quality sources provides those sources. So what are the sources of this info?
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/22 08:31 PM
1

Women are totally attracted to beautiful bodies. But that attraction is in conversation with their feelings in relation to subtler aspects of personality like voice-tone, posture, language, smell and touch, Men tend to focus on a smaller part of women -- the visual form, while women take in a bigger picture. As for the rest, try meditating or exercising, and get over the absurd jealousy/comparisons. Get out of your head, and back into your body and feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 04:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter