TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ametalshard Archive

View 8 posts and 589 comments by ametalshard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

yes they body shame and embarrass women all the time for every possible reason this is common throughout media even in 2022
/r/MensRights13/11/22 05:58 AM
1

Who are you? Do you persist after you are dead? Private property is the most nonsensical thing humans ever dreamed up, tbh. "For all of timespace, for all eternity, everyone in the universe must honor my claim that I own this physical space, simply because I called it first." Who gives you that right? Why are they allowed to unilaterally decided private property must be imposed on all other sentient beings in the universe?
/r/MensRights25/02/19 08:31 PM
1

Women are seen as inferior and are thus encouraged not to donate
/r/MensRights25/02/19 08:29 PM
2

What country? I'm sure plenty of countries out there see women as inferior and thus don't allow their donation.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 08:27 PM
3

That's not true. Most of them inherited money or were given it due to connections. Over 60% of the Forbes 400 inherited...
/r/MGTOW26/01/19 03:37 PM
2

What? there are thousands of female multi-millionaires
/r/MGTOW26/01/19 03:29 PM
2

There are like a hundred thousand multi-millionaires in my country. Most of them do it off the products others made. At least she doesn't do that. All that said, sex work (including all patreon and cam work) should be legalized so it can be fairly taxed. Where is the push for legalization?
/r/MGTOW26/01/19 03:28 PM
1

Why?
/r/MGTOW26/01/19 03:24 PM
1

you're fucking insane and you deserve everything coming to you
/r/MGTOW26/01/19 03:17 PM
0

How are any of the subs I frequent "Right Wing"? They're filled with reactionaries? Uhhh what the fuck? lol what did you think the subs you use were even about? Stop it with the intellectual dishonesty or I won't respond to you again. women are more miserable now than when they were "house slaves" Like is this something you would say to your daughter? How about your mother? Or grandmother?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:13 PM
0

I don't know who Sarah Jeong is. But after looking at your profile a bit, I see almost every right-wing sub you're active in is absolutely CRAZY about her. Funny enough, nothing she has ever done has ever affected any of the white leftists in any of my groups. She's not even on the radar. Why do you think that is? Care to point them out mister high and mighty Social Justice Warrior? You, first of all. here's another, without even trying to look: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/94k7h…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:03 PM
1

I don't want him tortured to death, but Nazis do. What do you think the Nazis in America actually want???
/r/MensRights05/08/18 07:38 PM
1

You are defending race and gender based hatred because it's directed at white men. That makes you a SJW. I'm an MRA and intersectional feminist. I want more rights for men, but at the same time, I defend (generally) the right of women to be angry at the millennia of oppression they've endured and continue to endure. For me, it's not about individual people. Is this particular woman right or wrong? Why does it matter? The ages of misogyny are evident. They are real things. To deny that is to deny…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 07:18 PM
0

tell ME how I, in my whole life on the planet, oppressed and enslaved someone I never met lol jesus, how reactionary can you possibly get? It must suck reading anything above a 5th grade level because you are wholly unable to penetrate into ANY nuance someone I never met and won't ever want to meet after how non-chalant she is about her bigotry I hope you get this mad at every bigot in literally every single thread on this sub
/r/MensRights05/08/18 07:09 PM
1

Misandry does exist, yes
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:14 PM
-9

You're directing one attack at disparate, different groups. Let me help you out a bit. SJWs had previously put a lot of effort into lying about how privilege was never about justifying mistreatment of the privileged group. Here, you're talking about liberals, like the majority of Trump supporters. They claim to believe in quality, while I do not. I believe in equity. There's a very big difference! You can google that if you want to learn more :) you and your ilk are not just people I politically…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:36 AM
0

Democracy? lol I literally work in politics, please get out of here with that. Democracy in America died with Citizens United. I was very loud the entire 2016 run in my distaste for Clinton, and I did not vote for her. That said, American voters voted for her. They were wrong to do that, but the tiny sliver of democracy we had chose Clinton. I would have hated her almost as much tbh. Oh no no no, much better to have a lawyer and “community organiser” running everything. LOL. Nope, fuck all liber…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:15 AM
-5

In case you didn't know, this sub isn't interested in playing victim olympics. FUCKING LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! have you... ever read any of the comments here??? Dozens of people on this sub over the past 2 years have informed me that white men are the most victimized people in the world. Trump says something shitty about women and is (rightfully) called out on it. He boasted about sexually molesting multiple women. Then, he, another white man and with NO political experience, was voted into …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:59 AM
-4

I've been in this group since before I made this account btw. I've watched it turn from an advocacy group into a right wing, anti-PoC, anti-women subreddit, flooded with members of the ultra racist Nazi subs that were permabanned a couple years back. So you're fooling no one by framing this as a "victim's advocacy sub". lol. On the topic of suicide, I have lots of suicidal female friends, and some suicidal male friends, and am myself AMAB and was suicidal for YEARS. So I kind of know what it's l…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:54 AM
-2

I never said you said it didn't exist.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:18 AM
-12

Yet despite there being WoC with decades of political experience, obviously orders of magnitude more qualified than Trump... WoC who have never committed any crime, never expressed anything you right wingers could misinterpret as bigotry... still, America voted in the white man with no political experience who told them "women are so inferior to men that I can sexually molest them at my whim, aren't I awesome? Vote for me". Yeah, clearly WoC have privilege over white men, systematically, across …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:12 AM
-11

So you're saying misandry doesn't exist? Which claim is wrong here? Please be clear
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:04 AM
-30

The most powerful man on the planet bragged about sexually molesting multiple women. The two examples aren't even close. One is "I hate people who have historically oppressed and enslaved people like me and continue to" The other is "I molested women and I'm proud of it. Now vote me into the most powerful position on Earth" Anyway, I believe a kind of misandry exists, but it's simply not the same as misogyny.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:49 AM
-7

In most of the world, marriage functions as an arm of the patriarchy, keeping women as house-slaves. The closer you look, the sadder the reality for women really is. Also, you were talking about one localized thing, so why do you criticize her for talking about the world at large?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:57 PM
0

She wasn't though. Maybe you and she are talking about entirely different things / she is operating with far more context
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:51 PM
-2

Women, lgbtq, and PoC are still oppressed just as the working classes are. I agree with your analysis but find that as a world, we are engaged in far far far too little idpol as it is, and that ignoring class happens at a much smaller rate than you think. Fully 1/3 of the planet or more believes women are to be blamed when they are raped by men, for example. Most of the East believes that and large swaths of whites in the west believe it as well. That is an issue we should concern ourselves with…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:49 PM
1

We don't agree. I'm generally pro-idpol... and btw, what do you think MRA constitutes?!?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:35 PM
1

I am an actual leftist just informing you of a mistake you made. And I'm curious why you think you are an anti-idpol leftist. What makes you leftist? I'm honestly curious.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:31 PM
3

"leftist radical"? No, you're a liberal if you believe in equality, not a leftist. Leftists believe in equity.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:27 PM
1

You'll find relatively equal parts of the left pro or anti or neutral concerning idpol. But you'll find pro-capitalism and pro-liberalism rampant across this subreddit
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:25 PM
-8

Uhh it only does that in a minority of cases. Most marriages across the world are oppressive misogynist institutions. Only in some countries does it sometimes benefit women over men.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:23 PM
-35

Where would you like me to start?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:20 PM
-1

I highly disagree. Everything should be the same
/r/MensRights27/07/18 12:41 AM
10

Got any examples?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:48 PM
3

Does NYT publish opeds by revolutionaries? Why or why not?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:40 PM
10

Does NYT publish opeds by revolutionaries? Why or why not?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:39 PM
0

What? I would refer to you however you wanted. Why do you think otherwise?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 06:42 PM
1

nope, you disagree with science; I agree with it
/r/MensRights19/04/18 06:23 PM
1

What word would you use for people who disagree with science and discriminate against people based on their gender?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 06:03 PM
1

Just because someone disagrees with you What makes you think this is the only issue at play here?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:48 PM
1

They certainly can reference the same thing, but in this context, they are different.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:24 PM
1

Ah, I misunderstood. Well, you claim that science doesn't define my standards. It does
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:15 PM
0

What would you like me to show, precisely? :)
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:11 PM
-1

There's no definition, so you have to accept anything anyone says it is and have no right to do otherwise. This is perfectly okay. Your gender and your political party are your business. They are whatever you say they are and I cannot argue with it. Both can change, as well. This is what happens when you don't use science to define your standards. You're free to provide peer-reviewed scientific articles against genderqueerness. I've ended this type of conversation too many times this way. You wo…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:03 PM
-2

I was part of MRA all the way through my understand that I was queer somehow. MRA used to be much more progressive and accepting. Now it's... like you I was asking about pronouns because I wanted to demonstrate the fallacy that person was making about others perceiving the self. They were making an anti-personal liberty argument.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:00 PM
-5

May I please ask your gender and/or which pronouns you prefer?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:38 PM
0

Ah, that's sex. Gender is what you want to use to describe a person.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:01 PM
1

You can be a man and any combination of those things or other things, or anything else and any combination of those things or other things. This concept does not reinforce gender norms; it reinforces freedom and liberty of personal autonomy. Your gender expression is whatever you say it is. This isn't difficult to grasp unless you just literally hate freedom.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 03:38 PM
-5

How dare people express how they feel? Yes this is my argument. Why are you so afraid of people expressing their gender?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 03:30 PM
2

It's generally accepted in the lgbtq community (outside of a few bigoted transpeople) that someone needn't experience dysphoria to be trans. You can be happy with your body and still be genderqueer or trans. :3
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:36 PM
3

yeah this sub used to be more progressive but is just rightwing bigoted trash now
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:32 PM
-10

why are there so many rightwing, transphobic bigots here?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:18 PM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:12 PM
2

I'm also curious where I made that argument... also, what made you think I was a guy
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:11 PM
-1

Why?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:10 PM
-4

censor? I'm saying there are far more transphobes here proportionally than there used to be.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:08 PM
-3

another transphobe there
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:07 PM
-3

Reread my comment
/r/MensRights19/04/18 08:52 AM
-48

there seems to be a scary amount of transphobia in this community these days. it was once more progressive, but I'd say the bulk of mra is garbage now
/r/MensRights19/04/18 08:18 AM
-4

Nope. A transwoman is a woman.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 08:16 AM
-18

You are whatever gender you believe you are.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 08:15 AM
19

There is usually a lot more to legally identifying as another gender than a simple pronouncement.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 08:15 AM
18

In at least one area, you can change your gender on your ID to non-binary, no questions asked. But legally, this is not the same thing as trans (though there is an argument in the lgbtq community that genderqueer of various sorts can be considered trans).
/r/MensRights19/04/18 08:13 AM
5

Put transwomen with women, transmen with men
/r/MensRights19/04/18 08:11 AM
-14

yep, this is toxic masculinity
/r/MensRights16/04/18 02:32 PM
1

It's true. Different demographics do different things, and societal systems have the biggest effects on all of it. So let's change them, as the image suggests.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:43 PM
-1

it's true
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:41 PM
1

I don't understand all these comments. The original argument from the picture is totally accurate.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:41 PM
0

how many men kill themselves with AR-15s?
/r/MensRights20/03/18 10:05 PM
-13

to answer your question: not necessarily
/r/MensRights15/03/18 05:04 PM
-2

I've had relationships before, and I still talk to a lot of people I'm attracted to. I know I'm not that special with regards to romantic love over sexual love. But hey, you guys can keep using exclusionary language if it makes you happy. This sub is so, so, so much more TRP-esque than it was just a year or two ago.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:20 AM
0

"every relationship starts with sexual attraction"
/r/MensRights31/01/18 03:34 AM
-1

lol what??? are you fucking kidding
/r/MensRights31/01/18 03:08 AM
3

What the fuck is your point?
/r/MensRights08/01/18 01:05 PM
0

Legal and correct Oh no Activism doesn't work / you overplayed your hand Oh god. Oh, fuck. I didn't realize what the fuck I was talking to. Comment post history: Milo, racism denial, and TRP defense. I'd bet it all you have at least one extra account just for alt-right and transphobia posting. Get blocked, shit stain
/r/MensRights25/12/17 08:26 PM
-1

This entire post and comments section is a concern troll. Hundreds of people ignorantly claiming that going to the media/social media is pointless, or useless. That's objectively, demonstrably false and portraying as such the only option thousands have for any semblance of justice or even just emotional relief is terrifyingly damaging. Characterizing social media as a place to take things with a grain of salt (as with all things institutionalized bodies tell the masses) is how we should continue…
/r/MensRights25/12/17 07:35 PM
2

the ignorance in these comments is pretty disgusting.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 12:59 PM
3

nothing about men's rights is RP
/r/MensRights15/11/17 12:53 AM
-1

Eh I understood the point and it is valid, but the division between bsa and gs is sexist for sure and not a good thing to jump back on. In that respect the implied analogy is poor
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:12 PM
-1

Where are the boys clamoring to learn the ancient art of door to door canvassing?
/r/MensRights17/10/17 10:18 PM
-7

wtf? Dude BSA / Girl scouts is sexist af and doesn't belong in this conversation. Girl scouts literally make and sell cookies and paint things pink while boy scouts learn all sorts of valuable skills. There is no argument here. BSA shoukd be open to all and should shed its religiosity. It's not a private organization
/r/MensRights17/10/17 08:37 PM
-2

who? it's an amazing idea
/r/MensRights17/10/17 08:35 PM
1

Oh yeah, sure. That's why half of girls on dating sites have strict height requirements for guys and dudes with their six packs showing objectively get more attention. You're living in a dream world
/r/MensRights08/10/17 09:27 PM
4

not really
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:45 PM
1

Rough play =/= the neverending concussions of MMA, boxing, American football, etc. But this is all exceedingly-well documented. Sorry you're so dead-set on being on the wrong side of history. The science is there (and other, more-intelligent countries are way ahead of us, like Sweden), but in general it will take people like you (most Americans) a good 2-3 decades to catch up. why don't you stop trying to tell other people how to live their lives and raise their children? lol go back to the fuck…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:36 AM
15

Men enjoying hurting themselves, destroying their brains in later years, etc, absolutely factors into men's lower lifespans. But hey as long as it's fun, let's keep encouraging children to get into the lifestyle from a young age!
/r/MensRights26/06/17 08:12 PM
1

Yeah I had to leave KiA the same way. So sad.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:05 PM
-5

Yeah it was COMPLETELY different a while back. Honestly, feminist lies weakened this community enough that it no longer held the immunity to stand up to the alt-right and Trump supporters that have been beating down the door for a long time. It's pretty much over at this point. I've given up on the dream.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:47 AM
1

What has he done?
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:43 AM
-7

...and??? What the fuck is your point?
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:43 AM
4

All the people he is on the record claiming he has abused, for starters. Any other questions?
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:42 AM
1

Yeah equate an extremely common word that all humans understand with a word that fewer than 1% have ever even heard or seen, and that fewer than 1% of those have any clue what it could mean. Definitely not a flawed comparison at all.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 08:45 PM
-5

so funny!
/r/MensRights24/03/17 12:22 AM
-13

Fuckin' A. Anything that's anti-capitalist is good in my book.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:46 PM
4

Totally unrelated to publicly shaming women for trying to date. You can attempt a second time to answer either of the questions posed. I'll wait.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 06:41 PM
–

Do you or any men you know publicly shame women they aren't attracted to? Do you know what the term "double standard" means?
/r/MensRights03/03/17 06:14 PM
–

You completely missed the point. The double standard is that men are shamed publicly for exactly the same thing that guy did.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 06:03 PM
–

SJWs publicly shame tinder men daily on my facebook
/r/MensRights03/03/17 06:02 PM
–

For example, OkCupid studies show that most women rate most men below average. Like 70%+ of men have "below average" looks to women. Think of the ridiculousness of that concept. Add to that the sexual revolution (this isn't a bad thing, just a factor that lead to the "90-10" statistic), and general shaming of men for decades and decades, and you have a society where the top % of men (looks and money) get many, many women, while a much, much, much greater % of men than historical numbers will get…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 05:46 PM
49

Nope. The worst possible woman will barely receive less attention than a slightly below-average man.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 05:40 PM
181

The majority of male tinder users never get any match, not just the types listed above. If Tinder ever released any meaningful statistics on their match rates, the company would go under in a day.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 05:39 PM
1

Totally missed the point. You must not have many feminist friends
/r/MensRights03/03/17 05:24 PM
7

Agreed. A TON of Milo supporters here, which is sad because he explained clearly that he is not an MRA, and his stance against gays should have been unacceptable in a community that used to be much more egalitarian. I've been an MRA for several years now, but seriously FUCK this particular forum. It should have done more to stop the bigotry from seeding itself here. It can go fuck itself.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:54 PM
5

In almost any mainstream movement, you will find many people who cannot articulate their reasons for protesting. But whatever the case, that women's march undoubtedly inspired at least some solidarity with women in cultures where their oppression is clear-cut (like with Islam). It always helps them, and the fact that this annoys white supremacist misogynists in America should never be a concern.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 07:10 PM
7

It's basically the same as shouting down a speaker at UC Berkley because he has a different opinion than you. "Gays are inferior. Whites are superior. Non-Christians, non-gays, and non-whites don't deserve human rights. The fact that I am gay and have sex with black people means I cannot possibly be anti-gay or white supremacist. The state should enforce this. I don't care that white supremacist terrorists are shooting innocent people every month because of this rhetoric." Yeah, people are mad a…
/r/MensRights08/02/17 07:06 PM
2

Who paid all the right-wing protestors over the past 15 years? And who is being paid out of those protestors? The Tea Party? All the anti-gay Christian protestors? All the white supremacists? The people protest all the time; usually not on as large a scale as the left, but still. It stands to reason they're being paid to do it, too, right?
/r/MensRights06/02/17 01:24 AM
1

It's this weird as fuck conspiracy from pretty much everyone on the right. They honestly believe anarchists, the far-left, and anyone who protests (besides the many types of right-wing protests, like white supremacists, anti-gay Christians, Tea Party, etc etc) must be paid to do it, or at least a significant number of them are. It's completely unfounded and a double standard because they won't discount protest from the right, only the left.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 01:21 AM
0

this has been reposted here so many times
/r/MensRights30/01/17 10:49 PM
8

I hope some guy got paid good money to clean this up.
/r/PussyPass22/01/17 08:02 PM
2

A billion dollars might come close.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 04:57 AM
1

Okay? Maybe not literally all of human knowledge, but certainly more than videos of people crying; I would know, as I have a huge social circle and never see such content, even when most of my circle is very liberal.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 02:09 AM
1

If a topic doesn't belong in a sub then delete it outright. Yeah... you think the mods are ideological teenagers? Wait till you delete alt-right content. You've never even fucking seen a teenager. We should welcome dissenting views in any sub's comments Sorry; I wasn't referring to comments. I'm referring to complete sub takeovers where the highest-voted posts are completely against the entire point of the sub, and the moderators are left helpless to deal with it. Like KiA going full-Trump, and …
/r/MensRights12/12/16 06:46 PM
-1

Locking threads is a simple way to deal with problems that have no easy solution. KiA has become overrun with racist Trump supporters, for example. What can you do about that? This sub (/r/MensRights) has a lot of alt-righters. For some reason, Milo gets upvoted here whenever he's posted, even though he is outspoken both against Men's Rights, and gay rights. I wish more of those threads were locked, because all of that content is expressly anti-MRA. Why do we love anti-MRA content in an MRA sub?…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 06:29 PM
3

I have little else to say here. Honestly, I've only seen ONE video of a guy crying in front of a camera in any men's right's context. Maybe you've seen a LOT more, in which case, I can only request that you put us in touch with your wider circle of friends somehow, because I'd be very interested in meeting them. Other than that, sorry you aren't interested in the opinions of your friends. But it's cool you apparently still care enough to keep them, despite being so tired of them. Must suck a lit…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 06:25 PM
2

Your opinion is directly at odds with men's rights. This isn't a vacuum; while your opinion is valid, it's problematic in that it represents a serious issue men have had to deal with for hundreds of years around the world. Your opinion is like that of a Catholic posting in a SNAP sub: I'm tired of all these adults publicly complaining that they were raped as children by Catholic priests. Why can't they just be themselves? They don't need to complain in public about it! Yeah, we've made some prog…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 06:15 PM
14

You've yet to show how it's a problem for anyone besides people who want to see it. Almost everything gets posted on social media. In your opinion, what is and what isn't "attention whoring"? Just stuff you don't like? Not to mention, it's certainly not everywhere I look. My social media is not the same as yours. Maybe it's similar, and an argument can be made for homogeneity in social media, but that's not what we're talking about. You make a choice to follow people who post certain content.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 06:01 PM
2

I got banned from the_Donald just for posting poll responses from Trump voters and nothing else.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 05:40 PM
14

That is exceedingly rare across the globe. Don't ever let that reality be forgotten. Most of the time, women shame or leave men if they show emotion. It might not be right away, but it is often caused by that show of emotion. This has to do with biology, as does most of gendered behavior, but the fact remains this is the reality for the majority of human male-female relationships. Thankfully, with the advent of gender equality, it's more okay both for women to be more masculine (in this case, th…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 05:21 PM
25

Public crying? What public crying are you talking about? The entertainment television shows which specifically market every second of their productions to maximize profit? You're tired of that? You're the one who chose to turn on the tv and watch it on a certain channel at a certain time. No one's forcing you to do that. Not a single step of that is forced.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 05:16 PM
4

You have an interesting point. 30 years ago, lots of things were different. She might not be nearly as much of a shitbag as lying mothers today.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 10:36 PM
2

Most people never look at usernames, so that's kind of irrelevant. I've used this sub regularly for 3 years and I've never seen your name.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 12:00 AM
3

How can you know? The feminist subs leak that stuff all the time.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 11:24 PM
2

yes
/r/MensRights22/11/16 02:32 AM
1

Are all of you people honestly autistic? How is it possible to know someone is uncomfortable without literally reading their mind? Social interaction is so difficult, it's impossible to make any reasonable judgment from body language and tone! Bye Autistia.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 01:00 AM
1

None of that was helpful in any way. The assumptions you made about me were pretty hypocritical/funny, though. Someone appearing uncomfortable before noticing me is one thing. Appearing uncomfortable not until seeing me is another. You're assuming the worst When? When did I do that. Please cite the comment where I did that. Assuming bad faith would be thinking they dislike me in any way, shape, or form. I never said even that much, much less the worst.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 08:56 PM
0

Just sharing the perspective from the other side. Other side of what? I'm not accusing anyone of anything. Your analogy has nothing in common with my situation, besides being two humans interacting.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 03:31 AM
3

You're right. I didn't need to be that unhelpful. Any tips on how to respond to claims of denial like "it's in your head"? I know for a fact it isn't. It's not like I'm schizophrenic or paranoid or something. Maybe I just don't respond to that at all? It's just annoying when that's where the discussion ends, and, well... the votes speak for themselves. I guess I just don't exist at all as a person?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 03:29 AM
1

Something strange is going on here if you think people are being confrontational about this. Perhaps it's in your head?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 03:24 AM
0

I can try to elaborate further than I have, but it'll be difficult. I dress regularly for a guy at a gym, but I feel like I walk the way a disinterested--yet attractive-- girl does. I generally don't make eye contact unless I want to speak with someone about something, just like girls who avert their eyes so every guy at the gym doesn't think they're interested in them. This demure thing can be weird for guys. And then, I'll completely switch it up and make eye contact more often, and be much mo…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:51 AM
-5

That comment was responding to a specific question about a specific interaction. My very first comment talked about people I knew questioning my sexuality. You're taking my comments out of context. I accept your apology for assuming I'm incognizant without even reading the comments right here, in this thread.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:39 AM
1

Nope, nothing strange. Just people that, naturally and perfectly normally, need to label things and are confused how to do it when confronted with something out of the ordinary. Nothing strange or wrong about that at all. Also, it's definitely not in my head, but I guess the earlier evidence of everyone I know verbally questioning my sexuality isn't evidence enough for the experts in this thread. That's fine. I didn't expect anyone here to express their understanding verbally. In silence, some m…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:29 AM
-6

Yep, strange looks and looks of surprise when normal gym talk come out of my mouth are all in my head. I suppose the constant questioning about my sexuality is all in my head, too. Aw, shucks!
/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:27 AM
-11

It must have something to do with my appearance. I'm muscular, yet pretty demure, and maybe somewhat feminine? Hey, your guess is as good as mine, and theirs. Certainly, no words are ever exchanged on the topic, since most people obviously hardly even care that much, and are generally polite. I've been using gyms without issue for a long time, and I still don't personally consider it an issue. Just throwing it out there that some people might not be as okay with making others uncomfortable just …
/r/MensRights20/11/16 11:22 PM
-7

I'm not gay. I've never been attracted to a male in any way, ever. And I don't walk around naked or anything, though I do use showers... just like everyone does.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 11:16 PM
-3

I am biologically male, but almost no one understands my sexuality (for some reason, though I don't act flamboyant, everyone (family, lifelong friends, new friends) in my life feels compelled to question my orientation). I personally have no problem using "male" facilities, but I can tell I make others uncomfortable. I happen to be relatively thick-skinned, and so this doesn't really affect me, but I can see others in turn feeling uncomfortable or unwelcome if this happened to them as often as i…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 10:20 PM
3

Why didn't he explain it on television?
/r/MensRights12/11/16 09:46 AM
1

Plenty of Canadians have welcomed us with open arms. Also, Canada is more like the US than is Mexico. Any other questions?
/r/MensRights11/11/16 10:15 PM
1

There is never such a point in time at my gym, so I guess it never happens.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 06:20 PM
3

Yeah, that's true. Even if you do both, it is a sausage fest. I wonder where all these rude people messing with girls are, though. Like I've never once seen it happen in any gym outside of gyms that cater to high-schoolers and college freshmen.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 09:16 AM
1

I much prefer female hair stylists to barbers, and I'm a man. I just have different hair.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 09:14 AM
10

You don't know if the teacher holds the views she is arguing.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 07:56 PM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights31/10/16 11:05 AM
2

Who said anything about women? Plenty of male feminists hate men (their own words). By the way I'm voting Jill Stein, something only an evil woman-hating patriarchist would do.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:28 PM
0

little tilted but 70-to-1 average Oh, I read it.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:35 PM
0

70-to-1 That's what you're arguing for.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:28 PM
1

After all, without the CEO doing his work, NONE of the workers could work. rofl, it's incredible how you don't see your own contradiction. Your argument here places 100% of the value of a company on the CEO, 0% on the workers who keep it running. By your logic, the CEO should take literally all income.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:27 PM
8

Um, nah. Most of feminism demonizes men, and the ones who claim not to demonize do nothing to stop it. It's completely warranted to paint with broad strokes in this situation, as well as any like it.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:25 PM
2

It is real. Just not technically as bad as it seems. But still an issue.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 09:26 AM
7

25* years ago. still, hopefully she has changed.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 05:23 PM
1

you'd think so, until you've seen the tattoos
/r/MensRights06/10/16 08:58 AM
7

Internal investigations are held in high regard by the courts. How is your comment even upvoted?
/r/MensRights04/10/16 07:57 AM
0

Many rights won't be a problem with sexbots, because they'll never factor into the equation. How can a woman abuse the courts against a man when the woman and man never, ever interacted in the first place? Surely there will be some methods of doing so, but there will be far fewer with sexbot availability.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 04:34 AM
-2

How do those people factor into you and a sexbot?
/r/MensRights15/09/16 12:51 AM
51

No one has true autonomy in a societal vacuum, but in a democracy, forced child support when abortion cannot be forced is certainly a violation of autonomy. 1) Not everyone is assessed that charge. 2) Someone else makes the decision that results in that assessment. But this also assumes the problem of personhood is solved, which it objectively hasn't been. There are potentially 3 persons in this equation, yet society's pro-choice stance operates otherwise with no explanation whatsoever.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 12:19 AM
1

There is absolutely no useful information there. There isn't a current divorce rate given.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 06:53 AM
1

You shouldn't. There is no data showing there is a 1/3 divorce rate. Check the source.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 06:42 AM
1

this was two years ago
/r/MensRights03/08/16 06:33 AM
1

Anyone can find evidence in English. Pick your source; pick even the most conservative of sources and we'll easily find evidence. It's not hidden... it's been common knowledge for decades. TIME, NEWSWEEK, NYT, LAT, TBG, etc etc etc have all reported on it for decades. Thousands upon thousands upon thousands of neutral sources. But I don't need a neutral source, because, again, it's common knowledge. Pick the most conservative, non-neutral source you can find, and I'll give you evidence. Milo him…
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:57 PM
1

Wait... hold on. Are you honestly confused about my statement about self-hating, misogynist conservatives? Are you not from America? This isn't some conspiracy theory. Voting records going back decades prove this. Similarly, homosexual conservatives have supported hundreds of homophobic Christian organizations dedicated to "stopping the homosexual agenda" and "praying/torturing/therapying the gay away". I wasn't aware you were not from the States, so I ignored the request for evidence thinking y…
/r/MensRights01/08/16 05:22 PM
1

Never been there and don't intend to go. How long have you been on the MRA sub? Just one year ago, the consensus among MRA's was that, if you were misandrist in any form (as Milo objectively is), then you were not an MRA. Even Milo himself knows and says himself he is not an MRA. Why do you want him to be classified as an MRA so badly? I can see why feminist brigaders would want this. It would help their agenda a shit ton to be able to claim literally any non-MRA as an MRA. So who are you? Why a…
/r/MensRights01/08/16 05:07 PM
3

Not at all. The majority of science in the world is for, and many countries do not support their own sciences like the west does. Even the enemies of western countries agree with western countries on climate change. There could be no stronger evidence for than that fact.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 12:24 PM
3

You do realize that all "science" against climate change science is privately funded by fossil fuel conglomerates, right? Rofl...
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:40 AM
0

Why ever respect him? Besides being a shock jock, he is nothing but an average conservative homosexual; self-hating and thinks all women are evil, also takes the Bible literally like WBC. I guess he's younger than the average homophobic conservative radio host? I don't see how that makes him respectable though.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:39 AM
1

It's not like that at all. What it's like is calling someone a misogynist for claiming all women are evil (which, by chance, he basically does on a regular basis, not just feminists). He believes gays are a detriment to society and he has legitimately, honestly attempted to "pray the gay away". Clearly you and I have different definitions of "irrational". There is much more than a difference in ideology here. He ignores the studies and instead believes in Westboro Baptist Church-style interpreta…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 07:19 PM
1

okay
/r/MensRights25/07/16 06:49 AM
1

That would include all those feminists who only send token appreciation to men's issues. That describes Milo's contribution to MRM better than anyone has so far. Thanks. Also, Unlike "feminist" which isn't a description. It's literally used as precisely that descriptor you're failing to use MRA for more often than it is any other part of speech. You could not have got your own meaning any more wrong than you did.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 10:13 AM
1

It's not like he's some humanitarian do-gooder whose main work isn't his misandrist writing. He is literally famous for, and his main works are, both his anti-feminism and his misandry.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 10:44 PM
1

Is there a reason why you're here? I'm wondering why his stuff gets upvoted in the MRA sub when he objectively isn't an MRA and I'm starting to see why. Not that your insightful opinion isn't valued and appreciated, but things as they stand are becoming more clear. MRAs aren't the ones deciding what gets attention in the MRA sub anymore. I guess it was a decent run.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 10:12 PM
1

No True Scotsman doesn't factor into a situation where someone actively campaigning against Men's Rights can be considered an MRA. I honestly don't understand how this is even a discussion, and cannot imagine those in feminist camps dealing with the same bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 10:08 PM
2

He advocates for some, but against others. This would make many feminists MRAs, too. In fact even some outright misandrists have at some point advocated for Men's Rights, if unknowingly. I suppose the better question by your definition would be, "Who in the world isn't an MRA?"
/r/MensRights23/07/16 10:06 PM
4

? Most of the time he talks about his gayness he is saying he wishes he weren't gay, and even tries to pray it away. Do you have any idea how much he hates homosexuality?
/r/MensRights23/07/16 10:03 PM
5

His own quotes: "But the thought that I might influence my child towards a lifestyle choice guaranteed to bring them pain and unhappiness–however remote that chance may be–is horrifying to me. That’s why, quite simply, I wouldn’t bring a child up in a gay household."[34] "But everything isn’t OK. And, ceteris paribus, no one would choose to have a gay child rather than a straight one. It would be like wishing that they were born disabled–not just because homosexuality is aberrant, but because th…
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:53 PM
1

He supports religious gay conversion "praying the gay away", one of the big issues MRAs fight against today. I cannot wrap my head around this... how can any of you support him and call yourselves MRAs??? Would he need to be a serial boy rapist in order for him to be disqualified? What would he need to do???
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:50 PM
1

Not only that, it continues to this day to fight against its victims (which likely number in the 6-7 digits worldwide). It will never, ever, ever come close to addressing its real problems. It never has and never will. Tithes to the Catholic Church go directly into the pockets of its lawyers who work to this day to keep victims out of court, and to its lobbyists who work to this day to shorten the timeframe in which victims can come forward with allegations of abuse. Seeing as the majority of th…
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:35 PM
-2

I'm calling people who care about the rights of all men "we". If that's a single orthodoxy to MRAs, I'm leaving today. This was not the same movement I joined.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:27 PM
3

Milo is homophobic and against other Men's Rights, too. He does not advance the MRA message. Maybe a tiny part of it, but also actively rails against other parts. Why should we support him over people who are 100% for MRA?
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:26 PM
-1

We should get Harold Camping, Trump, and Alex Jones on board, too. Any publicity is good publicity to a movement that doesn't really care about the issues they claim. /u/Pornography_saves_li, I await your endorsement of these esteemed MRAs (even the dead ones). Literally any publicity is good publicity.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:25 PM
1

They might be ridiculous but aren't special in the slightest. It's extremely common for conservative homosexuals to be homophobic.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:22 PM
6

Shit tons of conservative homosexuals are homophobic. This has been a national topic for several decades now.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:20 PM
-7

There are plenty of people who bash feminism who are not homophobic (as he is) or do not hold ridiculous views of women (as he does). So why do we share his shit?
/r/MensRights23/07/16 04:40 PM
1

It should be reiterated here that the person referred to in the initial post is objectively not a Men's Rights Activist. He's outspoken in his opposition against some men's rights, which obviously disqualifies him immediately, but in addition to that, he himself claims he is not an MRA. I don't know why this post got this many upvotes here. I can only assume we're being brigaded by some other subreddits.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 04:13 PM
1

Would it make sense for someone to tell you that you must follow Hillary around the country in order to hear, directly from her mouth, 1st part information about everything she says? Disregarding the monetary barrier, is there any reason you can think of for not complying with my request (not that I think Hillary is a good candidate at all, just using an example; any campaigning candidate would do)?
/r/MensRights23/07/16 04:10 PM
1

I'm centrist. I agree that anyone can be as hateful as they like. Free speech all the way. Make any website you want, feel free to deny gays access to your goods in your private business, etc. None of this means I have to enjoy the products hateful writers put out. What fucking part of this do you not fucking get? They have every right to hate whoever they want, but that doesn't meant I have to agree with and support those hateful beliefs.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:33 AM
1

"social justice warrior" Now, most people care about some form of social justice enough to talk about it sometimes. A SJW is someone who takes their fight to the extreme, never considers alternative viewpoints, and is incapable of any form of realistic debate.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 06:27 AM
-1

I don't need to look at fucking any sites, thanks. But I especially don't need to give clicks, views, or the slightest boost in site metrics to organizations which actively work to remove the rights of my friends. Am I making any sense to you?
/r/MensRights22/07/16 08:49 PM
1

Sorry. I've visited the site plenty of times, just defending a possible viewpoint. While there are definitely good points made by some of the editorials there, they are mostly overshadowed by the bigotry that comes along with it. It's not fun. It's ugly. Having a lot of lgbtq friends who suffer, I cannot in good conscience support the site at all. I'm centrist, not that it is relevant.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 07:03 PM
1

I wish nothing but the best for you and your analadventures.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 07:02 PM
1

Well fantasy isn't comparable to simple comedic fiction set in the real world, so you could work on your analogies.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:40 PM
-1

yep. it's pretty common for conservative gays to hate themselves. i have no clue why all the milo fans on reddit like to pretend he is any different
/r/MensRights22/07/16 05:22 AM
4

correct
/r/MensRights22/07/16 05:21 AM
5

Some literally cannot be posted onto twitter: i.e. too long
/r/MensRights22/07/16 01:18 AM
3

Breitbart: "gays are unnatural freaks of nature that God would never accept" redditor to someone who believes in egalitarianism: Way to be open minded buddy
/r/MensRights22/07/16 01:15 AM
-3

He literally campaigns against gay rights. You cannot be an MRA if you do this. Guess what? Many men are gay. Don't hurt yourself thinking about this too hard.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 01:14 AM
1

He is openly gay but also anti-gay, and certainly not egalitarian. That's two strikes against his being an MRA, and that's without even visiting his website.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 01:12 AM
5

Eh not commenting on anything else, but how do you criticize someone for devaluing a SJW? That's the SJW's MO.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 01:08 AM
9

Where is the next whoopi goldberg though? I'm not religious but Sister Act is still entertaining
/r/MensRights22/07/16 01:05 AM
1

Tell that to burn victims
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:49 PM
2

Why is their surgery less important than anyone else's?
/r/MensRights15/07/16 03:59 AM
6

For the same reasons the vast majority of people who are still on there are still on there. These stories represent a small minority of crazies. I use it, I talk to girls on there who I meet up with and go on dates with and one is a probable "steady thing" for me. I have literally never seen a single woman asking for anything like what this article suggests, despite using it heavily for the past 2 months.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 04:15 PM
-4

It was already "banned" via the Constitution. White America didn't give a shit about the Constitution, and many still don't.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 05:38 PM
1

Any person in 200,000 years of human history attacks another person And they answered that by countering with another attack?
/r/MensRights05/06/16 05:36 PM
3

There was already legal discrimination; that is, officers of the law turned a blind eye to (and often helped commit) widespread racism, murders, terrorism, etc.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 05:21 PM
-1

Sorry about the downvotes. As always, shitty lowbrow humor trumps literally any other kind of post on reddit.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 11:46 PM
1

that the genders will naturally mix together and we become a post-birth species. technological singularity and such
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:11 AM
2

trying to erase the natural differences between men and women ends up making nobody happy There is an argument for that sentiment, but I wouldn't call it an objective, universal "truth" as this article implies. It just so happens that nature erases the "natural differences" between men and women on its own just fine.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 05:14 PM
3

100 m are homeless, 1 b squatters/destitute
/r/MensRights19/04/16 05:52 PM
62

the tiny % of men at the very bottom (convicted rapists and murderers) Those aren't the very bottom of society. The very bottom of society are the hundreds of millions of homeless or near homeless, or destitute/suicidal men.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 04:33 PM
1

Men make up the very top of society, but the majority of the bottom end. Feminists objectively don't want equality, or else they'd be both pushing for women in the top and the bottom, instead of the top and the middle they currently reside in.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 08:05 AM
1

/r/europe is leaking. Somebody call a plumber.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 08:02 AM
1

The mother jones articles claim a different standard of mass shooting. They even literally claim their version of mass shooting is the equivalent or similar to the FBI's mass murder. I don't know how the writers missed something so obvious.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 03:55 PM
1

Turns out the data is faulty; Motherjones has their terminology wrong. This was all a waste of time.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 03:42 PM
1

Ah, I see. I didn't realize the Motherjones data was that faulty. There actually is a standard on mass shootings versus rampage killings, but it might not have been used consistently for the Motherjones articles. I was using a couple different sources. Motherjones clearly gets "mass shooting" and "mass murder" confused, and this is by their own literal admission. Well, thanks for pointing that out to me, but unfortunately there is no usable data that can be cross-referenced between these sources…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 03:41 PM
0

I'm fine with conceding a difference of less than 1 percent; that doesn't matter to me in the context of your comment. But honestly, I think it is more of a reflection of white people being statistically more successful and thorough in what they aim to do, including mass shootings, rather than stronger inclination towards rampage mass shootings. You must be trolling me. There is nothing to be honest about, nothing to think about. There are standard definitions represented when creating these sta…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 07:24 AM
2

I took a look at the "data" link on that very page you linked me, as well as checked the US census data... African Americans are 13.2% (15% of mass shootings) of the population, not 12. And White are 62.6% (65.6% of mass shootings) of the population. This is according to 2014 US Census. Also, 75% of rampage killings (that is, very effective mass shootings, as opposed to just a bunch of shots fired- these are usually rampages in workplaces and schools) are perpetrated by whites. Also, when it com…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 04:38 AM
0

link? most of the time people drop statistics like that, I find they are wrong
/r/MensRights17/04/16 04:00 AM
-3

That is pretty strange, though. Of course, there are a multitude of environmental factors for a previously enslaved people occupying a lower economic class to have violent tendencies, but why is it mostly white people who commit mass shootings? Maybe there is an American predilection to gun violence? And maybe white people just don't have access to the kind of gang environments that allow them an a never-ending stream of other people to shoot (some arbitrary other gang)? So they just have to sho…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 12:21 AM
22

Public schools don't have the right to free speech. Individuals do.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 12:16 AM
1

I understand that it's about people. But it's used the wrong way all the time, because truly broken people are never right.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 01:36 AM
0

If a device does its job in any fashion, how is it entirely without function? You might need to replace the battery in a clock, but even without a battery at all, it still functions 8.3% of the time.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 09:44 PM
-1

If it's right twice a day, it is still infinitely more functional than it could be. Is that clock broken by your definition?
/r/MensRights10/04/16 05:08 PM
1

Eh, I'm getting downvoted to fuck but let me clarify: I know that immobile hands are assumed. That first comment was misspoke. But the point got across. The idiom is objectively flawed.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 05:05 PM
0

Well, technically it could eventually be right, as my partially broken clock could be. It would just be at some arbitrary point in time. Either way, the idiom is faulty. It's also subjective how broken a clock is. That's most of my point; that the "broken" clock assumed in this idiom is far more functional than a broken clock can be. It's feasible for a broken clock to never be right a single time forever.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 05:02 PM
1

I don't know what you're talking about, so no. Is an autism measure a test for autism? Either way, I don't see how that question is relevant to the matter of the flawed "broken clock" idiom.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 04:54 PM
-7

But that's still more functional than it could be. Suppose it's broken but moves. A partially-broken clock is less functional.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 04:32 AM
-6

That assumes the broken clock makes full rotations of its hands separately enough from eachother. I still don't understand why people assume the broken clock would be so functional.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 03:22 AM
19

I hate to say it, but even racists who want the entire US to be 100% Christian and all gays and jews to die deserve the right to free speech.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 03:20 AM
1

And paid for school. Literally the 2010's equivalent of winning the lottery in any other time period.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 01:50 AM
2

8 actually would tho
/r/MensRights17/02/16 04:48 PM
5

40 years in prison is almost the equivalent of a lifetime sentence on its own. once you pass a full generation of time, i think it's safe to call it a pussypass
/r/PussyPass17/02/16 03:12 PM
12

You don't post on both subs all the time; a 5-second glance at your profile shows only a couple posts in as many months. I wonder if you're even allowed to post there today.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 08:03 AM
12

Sorry, but you're getting downvoted because many, many hundreds like you have come before you with the same claims, and they've been proven wrong too many times to count. You may very well mean well, but none of the claims of the egalitarianism of modern feminism hold up to any scrutiny whatsoever. I've tried. I wanted today's 1st world feminism to mean something good, but it doesn't. Them's the facts. Now, if you actually believe in egalitarianism (many don't, despite their claims), that puts y…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 07:54 AM
0

Um... what? Do you even live in the States?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/16 09:40 PM
1

Have you checked out Green Party?
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:30 AM
1

My bad, I thought you were referring to the inverse of that situation. The point of your comment still eludes me, at least in-context. Who do you want to win the presidency?
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:21 AM
1

Give one example of the opposite situation ending up worse than another situation in which the honest bigot had their way.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 11:16 PM
1

At least he's honest about his reasons for wanting it that way. I hear that so often from people defending Trump that that verbatim sentence just gives me negative vibes.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 02:52 AM
27

Go ahead and try it yourself. If we tell you we were banned for doing this exact thing before, you won't believe us. So try it yourself, if you don't mind your account being permanently banned.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 06:19 AM
1

Got a link? I checked both pages and reverse image searched this on three different engines and came up with absolutely nothing.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 07:26 PM
8

She could have killed numerous other people. What if the jockey saw her earlier, tried to avoid, and sent the horse careening into other people? When stupidity results in the same thing as does hostility, it doesn't bear making the distinction.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 07:21 PM
1

That's a misuse that has become so popular that it's almost accepted. To each their own. Colloquialisms are such.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:00 AM
3

I beg to survive.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:37 AM
5

It raises the question; does not beg it. Begging the question is something else entirely.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:32 AM
-9

downvoted for the title alone. you don't know what people are going through.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 07:25 PM
-2

Um... I will continue to judge trolls as trolls when they are trolling, because my time means more to me than it does to anyone else. You can give trolls and idiots the time of day if you'd like to.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 10:46 AM
2

Every woman who falsely claims to be raped by a man should be raped as punishment. That's not even the most ridiculous of that person's comments. His post history and karma are kind of entrancing. It's like a particularly disgusting homeless person shitting themselves in broad daylight.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 08:55 AM
16

Proof of hate speech, huh? Objective hate speech is complete abandonment of freedom of speech and but a step away from thoughtcrime. fuck that shit so hard.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 08:51 AM
4

This is honestly disgusting coming from someone who has no idea what it's like to be raped. I'm praying you're a troll. I was hoping they were either a troll or autistic, but it turns out that person is a moderator of this sub. What the flying fuck. I've been on this sub for quite a long time but cannot support those kinds of viewpoints. I honestly cannot remember the last time I read something so inanely insensitive as /u/AnnArchist's comments.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 09:56 PM
11

Sweden, lol. 1) Are you infantry? 2) Are those women infantry? 3) When was the last time Swedish infantry had to kill, let alone even point a gun at anyone?
/r/MensRights11/01/16 09:00 PM
1

Gender lens isn't a media problem, it's a simple reality of human biology.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:57 PM
7

Anyone who over reacts is a fucking sexist. Let everyone realize & analyze for themselves how they are being illogical. You act like the history of the world including current events don't already prove that you're wrong. There is no more realizing to be done; it has been done already. Female rape gets way more press than rape of young boys. Why? Because life is sexist. Biology is sexist. Evolution is sexist. There is no one to argue with besides mother nature.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:56 PM
3

There's no reason women shouldn't have the honor of dying for their country. IF you had read the article, you'd understand that this comment was already addressed. There is a reason, and that reason is that it degrades the military as a whole, because no one can handle warlike treatment of women. No one can handle dead, beaten, raped and mutilated women. We can handle it when it happens to men, but not women.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:53 PM
3

I have been making this exact argument in its entirety for years and was called misogynistic for it.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:50 PM
2

if we had mandatory "dumpster self defense" classes for babies Women have mandatory self defense classes? Are they free? I think I can cross-dress well enough to get into something like that.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:23 PM
39

2-day-old account, only posting images with no sources, and even this title is inaccurate. Checks out.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 06:42 PM
1

it's too bad this person had to post such a misleading title. unfortunate.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 01:20 AM
39

I think most people who dislike the concepts of supernatural sky beings simply resort to not believing in them, the same way they don't believe in Santa or Zeus or Mewtwo. Wouldn't make sense to hate concepts... you just reject the claims of their existence.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:58 PM
-1

The kid calling the police means that HE is the petitioner, not the defender. This at least starts them off on his side. That's not how this works. The kid doesn't have unions and shit protecting him like you do. He is a 1st-world male and that alone makes him a target for the system.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 12:33 AM
3

Yeah, they won't get anywhere being male in journalism. That small number doesn't surprise me at all.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 08:36 PM
-2

I'm an anti-feminist, always have been. Even banned from /r/feminism and /r/GamerGhazi So yeah. Have a good one. With your... uh... sage wisdom...
/r/MensRights13/12/15 04:02 AM
-4

Uh, I've been here about 2 years. I deserve all the ridicule and scorn I'm getting here? That's nice of you to say, because I'm getting none, at least not from any fellow MRA's (1k total karma from this sub). Have a good day and good luck getting out of the basement next year.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:05 AM
-3

I guess he correctly made arguments that are easily proven wrong pretty well, sure. But idk why that's an important distinction.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:16 AM
-5

This isn't a men's forum. This is a men's rights forum. Come back when you are ready to read the title of the fucking sub.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:14 AM
-3

I never claimed it was a common thing, but it certainly happens.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:13 AM
-2

gohomothrow's comments throughout this thread are something close to it. Every point he brought up was proven wrong at some point or another. He's trying to make the argument that all of feminism, ever, was entirely about man-hating and woman-superiority.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 08:49 PM
-8

Criticism of women, female spaces, or femininity in general may be seen as "emitting the vibe" of hating women because society is very sensitive to it. Nope. Some people on this very sub, people who get upvoted, actually believe all women are terrible people, saying things just a hair under the #killallmen shit.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 07:39 PM
3

11-minute 2-mile is like maybe average, slightly above average for high school varsity level. Record holders will have been chilling for over a minute before I finished.
/r/PussyPass06/12/15 04:40 PM
2

Hah, I purposely left out that I ran 2 miles in 11 minutes in high school.
/r/PussyPass06/12/15 04:32 PM
-11

I run like twice a month and I bet I can hit under 12 minutes for 1.5 miles. Where do I sign up for the AF (where I can actually get in)?
/r/PussyPass06/12/15 09:34 AM
1

Still, whenever I ask for a better source, I get downvoted heavily. These redditors really do think Ben Carson is a good person. They really don't think that countries proving gund regulation works exist.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 06:42 PM
-4

Any other source on this besides breitbart? Site's a joke outside of the odd men's rights article.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 05:55 PM
-2

Well, First Wave Feminism in the US is generally believed to have begun in the mid 1800s. Why the fuck are you even going on about women's rights rather than feminism here? If you'd read my comment at all, you'd understand. Proof given. I win. Edit: Nevermind, I thought you were joking, but the straight-faced seriousness of tone you have in your comments prompted me to look at your account. Holy fucking shit, you're insane. You don't have a place in MRA, and neither does anyone who thinks as you…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:16 PM
-3

That's actually pretty hilarious, and a great example of the end of first wave feminism's ultra-extremist cells. I'm inclined to agree to a point, because women's rights and feminism are two distinct if related movements. Still, the outset of women's rights movements was the early-to-mid 1800s. Your 1922 article has nothing to do with Margaret Fuller's era, nor even Susan B Anthony's era after Fuller's death. You're talking about 2.5 generations after it all began.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 09:11 PM
-3

The Sally Gearhart quote was from the 80s, some two decades after the first wave ended. Do you have any response to this or to the other guy's comment? 1 second of googling each point reveals huge flaws in your argument. At least half of your examples are wrong.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:59 PM
4

Yeah, I can't agree that it was founded on man-hate. Most of MRM agrees that some early feminism was essential.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:54 PM
0

You make a great point, but there are absolutely examples of behavior that looks a lot like misandry from every stage of feminism. This doesn't mean some feminism wasn't necessary, but that it wasn't ever necessarily pure.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:44 PM
2

Just tossing in my own experience here. I love my father though I almost don't know him. The divorce was over real, tangible problems my father had. He was absolutely at fault in my case.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 03:37 PM
1

I'm not sure at all about that. This might be one of the most centrist subs on the site.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 06:16 PM
5

I've actually held an administrative position in such a startup, nonprofit club. I drafted the liability waivers myself. Yeah, nothing's concrete, but if you keep it small enough, you're ok.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 10:40 PM
28

Or start your own Scouting or Camping club. It's extremely easy to set that up, just register your own Non Profit and get going. The only hard part is the actual organizing, which takes skill and experience, but that's really about it.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:05 PM
1

What? Why the anger? Sources matter and people care about them. Do you disagree that this source is full of nonsensical ultra-conservative bs?
/r/MensRights24/10/15 11:46 PM
-13

Please don't upvote this ultra-conservative source. All the "Caitlyn Jender" content on the side is painfully bigoted and ignorant. Don't give this page the views.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 08:34 PM
3

I think I do, but I don't care! :)
/r/MensRights27/09/15 04:12 PM
3

http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/malecircumcision/neonatal_child_MC_UNAIDS.pdf 1/3 of males 15 and up are circumcised. A technical minority, but circumcision obviously isn't opposed by a technical majority. Anything else you'd like clarified or corrected?
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:23 AM
-4

ITT: brigadiers trying to derail
/r/MensRights27/09/15 04:58 AM
-11

Yes. Many if not most of us, at some point in our lives, wondered why it was done. No harm was meant; it's mostly cultural. Imagine if first world countries permanently cauterized all pubic hair for all newborn girls.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 04:58 AM
-54

Thanks for voting this comment up above the ones initiating an on-topic discussion, reddit.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 04:49 AM
1

With any amount of logical thought, you'd realize the two aren't mutually exclusive. It's so obvious and people make that "this doesn't belong here" argument to derail so many threads in so many subreddits that it isn't worth the time to explain to you that they aren't mutually fucking exclusive
/r/MensRights27/09/15 03:42 AM
-4

Almost everyone on the planet.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 03:40 AM
3

Same deal at Catholic schools out here in Cali.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 12:46 AM
8

24 here and I'm a guy with long hair (the ladies love it). Try to find a good job with younger people who aren't traditionalist jerks. Lots of jobs, entry-level or not, still have limits on male hair. Hopefully around the time you go out there, it'll be a better environment.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 12:45 AM
6

Nope. I grew up in private Catholic schools. Girls always had it easier. They were allowed to wear literally anything the boys wore, plus skirts/flowery blouses, and they could cut their hair and have it in any of dozens of styles. Boys had three styles: bald, cornrows, and above shoulder-length. Boys got in trouble for not wearing belts far more often, even though it was required for everyone, etc. These rules and practices were more or less the same for each of the four private Catholic school…
/r/MensRights26/09/15 12:41 AM
5

requity'd
/r/MensRights23/09/15 10:08 PM
0

And? It's not possible to not have a problem with an action, while still supporting the consequences for that action?
/r/PussyPass23/09/15 04:56 PM
-8

You are the most daft person I've encountered on this site in months. My saying her mission is honorable has nothing to do with its legality. You're blocked, so any further reply is to yourself.
/r/PussyPass23/09/15 12:12 AM
-4

You shouldn't get away with a crime solely on the basis Read my post. Being treated differently for one's actions because of one's gender is wrong I agree with you. You'd know that if you'd read my comment before replying.
/r/PussyPass22/09/15 10:25 PM
-1

I don't disagree with you at all. No clue why I got downvoted.
/r/PussyPass22/09/15 08:15 PM
-13

I don't really have a problem with this. Being treated differently for one's actions because of one's gender is wrong, but the actual mission is honorable.
/r/PussyPass22/09/15 04:48 PM
1

link?
/r/MensRights30/08/15 10:09 PM
-2

Guilty people. Did you forget where you were?
/r/MensRights30/08/15 04:43 AM
1

Ignoring a potential problem isn't dominant, but a dominant person doesn't have the same problems as other people. Any other questions?
/r/seduction22/08/15 05:33 PM
-1

Activism? Is it about activism? And what rainbows are you talking about? I asked a specific question, no one gave me a clear answer, so I went onto something else.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 03:58 PM
-8

ok. ignored and forgotten, then. i'll never watch or know what this is.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:48 PM
10

ok. ignored and forgotten, then. i'll never watch or know what this is.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:48 PM
9

what is this?
/r/MensRights19/08/15 08:20 AM
2

Maybe it's only a California thing. Huge movements of Californians are feminist, anarchist, SJWs who hate whites, men, anything white people have ever said or built, etc.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:43 PM
3

You can call them conservative (still not clear on whether this is distinct from the American liberals) a thousand times, but they have always and will always vote democrat, when conservatives actually acknowledge men's rights activism.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:34 PM
4

Plenty, plenty of anarchists support mainstream feminism. As do socialists. Sure, not all of them, but plenty. Leftist ideologies objectively, demonstrably support feminism/bigotry. And your latter point makes some sense to me, but feminism pervades throughout most of the left. And I'm not ranting about shit. I don't attach myself to either Reps or Dems in the US. I'm just pointing out that, at least in the US, anarchists, socialists and, indeed, many of those who call themselves Dem or Liberal …
/r/MensRights18/08/15 07:36 PM
5

Just because you call either side your own doesn't not make it conducive as a whole to bigotry. And there is no problem at all with a reality where both general, political groupings are conducive to bigotry.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:39 PM
1

Don't worry; there is plenty of shit within the language that even native speakers know nothing about, not to mention the fact that it changes all the time. For example, you seem to have been taught that languages are proper nouns, and thus should always be capitalized. I believe that they are not proper nouns, and should only be capitalized when a specific educational course is referred to: English 200. It seems you're with the mainstream on that one, though.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:31 PM
2

'They' has been allowed since the 1300s. Sure, some people have had problems with it, but it's been accepted for over 600 years at least.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:20 PM
1

Use 'they'. I'm sorry you and the one you're replying to aren't aware of this. It's been the norm for hundreds of years. Where did you learn english?
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:18 PM
6

How is it silly? It certainly is the left, but why do you, specifically, think bigotry makes its home on the right?
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:16 PM
-6

No, it isn't a fair point. They are wrong at every stage.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:15 PM
6

Dropping a ball strengthens preconceptions about gravity. NotAllLawsofPhysics
/r/MensRights16/08/15 05:34 PM
-4

You haven't earned anything by being alive, so by your logic, why give him anything? It stands to reason you'd expect some kind of support. Technically, one can live on $25 a week in most countries on the planet.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 01:20 AM
3

Her real message here is that only worthless/beta/lowvalue men are attracted to her. She blames them, instead of herself.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 06:30 AM
6

It's private.........................................................
/r/MensRights20/07/15 02:41 PM
2

Not getting into the current argument, but at least that much was true: Wikipedia is officially the largest feminist website of all time, with tons of objectively misandrist bias.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:40 AM
1

I meant "recent" post history. Sorry you got hung up on that. I didn't check your entire fucking profile. I clicked once, looked for a few moments and saw all I needed to see. You are now blocked.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:33 PM
2

What is the point of counting karma whoring on default subs? Most people who have ever commented in default subs have those as their highest voted comments so those are basically irrelevant.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:51 AM
9

You missed the point entirely. Wow. edit: Ah, ok. Your post history is full of you trolling around across a wide variety of subs making homophobic comments, and your highest-voted comments are "nigger" comments on Coontown.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:38 PM
0

Throwing in a bunch of cheesy, unfunny lines is disrespectful to people who actually have been raped, whether or not you were.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:37 PM
0

Thanks. And just to clarify, at least Huffington Post isn't nearly as overtly bigoted as that other site. HP is only insultingly ignorant half the time.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 11:31 PM
6

He'll take learning into his own hands, thank you very much.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 05:40 PM
11

There are way, way more than 30 a year. It's probably around once a day or more.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 05:38 PM
8

I wouldn't link this particular website. It's very conservative Christian... "Tell Congress to pass a constitutional amendment defending true marriage" "Are gays born that way? Science says no!" "Judge under fire for refusing to perform gay marriage on religious grounds" And tons of other shit that hurts my head to read.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 05:34 PM
6

I totally agree with the war on boys, but that website is embarrassingly bigoted. Very conservative Christian.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 05:31 PM
3

Without a reputation, feminism destroys you. I can't blame them for wanting to live to fight another day.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 05:17 PM
-1

I'm 100% for men's rights, but your math is horrendous. Not only are you making huge, biased leaps of faith, your own evidence and logic works against you. If you believe the CPS would bring a prosecution if they could, and 100% of false allegations resulted in a conviction, how come there aren't anything close to 19,500 false allegation convictions? Not even 1/10?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 05:15 PM
3

saying that someone who is dumb is most likely to have a shit job Neither of us said that. You'll have to try harder, young trolliwan.
/r/PussyPass03/07/15 06:15 PM
1

Yep, done deal here.
/r/PussyPass03/07/15 05:57 PM
13

Women who get raped are either too dumb not to be raped or actually want it. It's either their choice to wear revealing clothing or they are too dumb to get better clothes. Two can play the nonsensical, bigoted, sexist asshole game.
/r/PussyPass03/07/15 05:50 PM
6

Except for the fact that far, far, far more men are homeless and work in extremely dangerous environments. If you want equality, why not start there?
/r/PussyPass03/07/15 05:34 PM
7

If you think it's easy for anyone to be physically attractive, you're delusional. It always scales. Five thousand girls at a big CA college could be slim, but only 5% will actually be very attractive. It takes work and genes.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 02:16 AM
6

You are literally the problem. And a fit-shamer.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 02:12 AM
2

It is kinda funny...
/r/MensRights30/06/15 12:28 AM
10

I got banned from /r/harrypotter for pointing out her failure of logic.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 07:03 PM
1

Hey, I still upvoted. Almost got me with that "American" comment, though. Of course we're all American!
/r/MensRights21/06/15 06:17 AM
26

Um... the US-based articles I read yesterday had the same anti-men bias. They painted the woman as the victim, or at least on par with the man she was trying to fucking kill. Maybe you should check your own bias and actually read the articles you're talking about.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 04:25 PM
10

yeah, i have no clue why this person linked us to some out of country news source, rofl
/r/MensRights20/06/15 04:13 PM
19

a 'poof' is a homosexual. it's like 70 years old.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 05:15 AM
8

Men are just as likely to be just as irrational on this topic.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:52 PM
1

What? But your name... it's... what? Your "last name" is the bassist's last name.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 06:22 AM
2

Your name. Sure wish /r/dragonforce weren't a dead sub...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 03:46 AM
0

You do realize some entire countries wouldn't exist today if not for environmental regulation on a worldwide scale...
/r/MensRights13/05/15 03:16 AM
2

I personally know plenty of liberals who have outright stated to me that freedom of speech is a bad thing. Young liberals. With nothing but the utmost clarity, they've told me that freedom of speech should be relegated far more than it is today. It's a growing ideal in today's feminism in general.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:31 PM
3

Very interesting comment. Appears the accurate summation in almost every way. The only problem I have is the problem of Free Speech. Why are today's "liberals" opposed to it?
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:11 AM
6

I'd like to add that a lot of Obama's voters still voted against gay marriage. Take California for example...
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:51 AM
2

basic universal principles of individual freedoms and civil rights. So conservatives who scream about the 2nd Amendment are actually... liberal?
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:50 AM
1

Where were all these trans people 1000 years ago? Did they exist? Were people too busy fighting, fucking and foraging to worry about some bullshit? Yes, they existed. Yes, we were too busy fighting, fucking and foraging to worry about anything else (so, we died before 23 years old until we started worrying). Are there any starving kids in Africa who are trans? Yes.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 07:03 PM
1

Not true at all, and if you know anything about futurology, you'd know sexual intercourse isn't required at all and just as likely as anything could become entirely obsolete. Everything can be perfectly simulated. Everything.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 06:55 PM
7

They also get addicted to women. Triggered.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 06:50 PM
19

Yeah, no one should get it twisted; every sub has mods. Every sub is a monarchy. The point is those mods should be the only people moderating.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 05:47 PM
2

The Sobeit Council
/r/MensRights06/05/15 10:19 PM
6

I don't understand. The TIME.com article linked to as a source on the wiki article makes absolutely no connection between the person and Men's Rights. It basically just says the guy's name and then the rest of the article is an opinion piece on the movement. The author does not even claim Elliot was a MRA, so how does it even work as a source? Edit: and in the ibtimes.com article, the closest thing to a connection is this: generally identified as “Men’s Rights” forums and the author even admits,…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 10:12 PM
0

typos and big black cock? british broadcasting corporation? what?
/r/MensRights04/05/15 10:02 PM
-4

Have you ever let someone borrow anything, ever? Just want to know who to put on my idiot list.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:59 AM
2

what does dog have to do with your comment? he is neither a politician nor someone whose commentary on politics is relevant...
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 02:59 PM
4

Yeah, it definitely happens. Just to a smaller percentage of guys.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:20 PM
4

LOL women hate players? Oh god, that's hilarious. And 100% untrue in all my personal experience.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:16 PM
0

Some of the First wave stuff was definitely essential. Women should have had the right to vote. The fact that men already occupied the shittiest places of society, like the homeless and soldiers, shouldn't have precluded that fact. It was not their fault that we chose to go to war and shit. They deserved that and other rights. It was about equality at one point.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 11:44 PM
2

That's what I was saying...
/r/MensRights10/04/15 11:11 PM
6

Modern feminism is anti-equality. Apologists here like to think it isn't, but it demonstrably is. If someone calls themselves feminist, they are co-opting modern feminism, even if they personally are in the minority of technical feminists which actually does care about equality. It's no one else's responsibility but their own to do something about it. It isn't your responsibility, it isn't men's right's responsibility.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 08:29 PM
0

Well, it is. I hate modern liberalism, but the liberals are still more likely to do the right thing slightly more often than the conservatives, so I hope they still win. But I'm still voting Green Party (voted Jill Stein in 2012, even though she has expressed a bit of feminist sentiment).
/r/MensRights10/04/15 04:38 PM
0

Men are sexually attracted to women because of women's bodies, and nothing else. Well, I guess that makes myself and millions of other men not men, somehow. You're pulling this shit out your ass and idk how it's getting upvoted...
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 08:24 AM
14

That is hardly an apology. I find that unacceptable.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:35 PM
-2

It works so, so often. Even the sweetest girls do it. Men absolutely don't cheat more often than women. I've had a girlfriend for 6 months and then she announced to me she broke up with some other guy that I had never seen, LOL.
/r/seduction03/04/15 09:53 AM
-6

Compatibility? Man, that's some serious fucking projecting. Can you smell what the white knight's cookin?
/r/seduction03/04/15 09:51 AM
5

Running the world is first priority. Attracting a mate is secondary.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/15 02:09 AM
9

In a competitive environment where the majority are white, blacks are going to not bother trying to compete because "being the odd one out" is too much of a burden. I was illustrating the point that one minority group already proved that being the minority means very little in a competitive environment. I'm not sure how my point wasn't extremely obvious...
/r/MensRights30/03/15 06:53 PM
7

Blacks weren't allowed to play any sports for quite some time. Almost immediately, even with less than 1% minority in some sports, they rose to the very top of the playing field, once there were race-neutral sports. rekt
/r/MensRights30/03/15 06:26 PM
18

the criticism I see often enough to this sub's posts are so embarrassingly spot on that it's disappointing. like...?
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:12 PM
-1

It can be a very tough situation... just because there were no signs of "great struggle" doesn't mean the sex was consensual.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 10:54 PM
1

I've heard black athletes in the UK citing, for example, sprinting as an alternative to gang culture. lol... virtually everything has been cited as an alternative to gang culture by virtually every race and every culture...
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 07:42 PM
3

Yep, races are physically different beings, and having 0.0001% difference in skin, hair, muscle, brain matter, is how biology works. Will anyone ever want to acknowledge those differences, the respective strengths and weaknesses of different types of humans? Maybe not, but the differences are so infinitesimally small that it really isn't something we should be focusing on. That being said, if we collect statistics on everything else and apply them to legislature, it is certainly bigoted not to u…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 09:25 AM
2

It sounds harsh, but I've seen it in practice more than once, from someone I thought was the sweetest girlfriend ever. It really shocked me...
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 08:53 AM
0

Feminism is a good thing. Nazism is a good thing. Communism is a good thing. Liberalism is a good thing. Conservatism is a good thing. Literally anything and everything must be good, if someone says it is. Subjectivism... is a good thing, idiocy is not. Yeah. You don't have a clue about the extent morality is relative, do you?
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 07:41 PM
1

Well, I hope you mean arguing against the person, as a feminist, not arguing against their ability to identify as another gender.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 07:39 PM
3

or a sexchanged black female.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 03:59 AM
0

the view that everyone deserves equal economic, political and social rights and opportunities. Most people believe that- besides the religious, the Chinese, the Indians and a few cultures like them. The point is that the kind of person we call social justice warrior actually believes that "everyone" is to be defined as "whoever they think is more oppressed". You see, it's all subjective in practice.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 03:46 AM
1

I used to do it plenty and really miss it. You have to force yourself to sleep on your back and straight though.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 05:00 PM
1

Damn. Ridiculously good point. We even have atheists who go back and forth, but when it comes to issues of gender equality, once you go MRA you never go back.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:45 AM
34

Eh... All the haze-murders and chants about lynching black people don't help. Let's not get ahead of ourselves.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/15 05:18 AM
9

5 is a unicorn after about 23 years old. 10 would be about the minimum but remember, you won't get an accurate count from the woman.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 10:45 PM
1

There’s no door-holding, no hand-holding and definitely no free drinks. There’s no taking off hats or courting through invitations. There are no smooth moves, no jackets to dinner. There are no flowers, no tables by candlelight. But, most importantly, there are no dates. This all definitely still exists, it just gets turned down. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:08 AM
-4

I'm ready for the downvotes, but the boy here actually blackmailed the girl into giving him nude photos. 15 is old enough to know better; these are sophomores in high school and have long known right from wrong. That child is sick and needs some kind of help; maybe the sentence was harsh, but it was fitting. Of course, we don't know if he will receive the counseling he needs (though he did attend some kind of Youth Treatment, so maybe he did!), but he definitely needed a punishment. But maybe no…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:50 AM
1

The fucking point is that you're being coerced. That is always wrong. Yes, there is a decision involved; she had the choice to have her life ruined and very likely be forced to move with her whole family to another town in order to avoid the harassment. She could have taken that. The boy also had the choice to run away with his family to a country without extradition. Both had the same choice, so why is this ruling wrong to you?
/r/PussyPass11/03/15 12:43 AM
-12

He should only be punished for the fact that he blackmailed a girl into doing what he wanted. But to ruin a dumb kids life forever He threatened to potentially ruin her life forever. The punishment might be slightly harsh, but it fucking fits the crime. I don't believe you've worked with kids, and I hope you never have kids of your own if you can't imagine the calculated emotional torture and panic that girl went through. To be honest, I'm getting sick of this and refuse to respond to you again.…
/r/PussyPass11/03/15 12:35 AM
-2

Really? There is not a lot of coed sleep-aways at a Young Mens Christian Association. So I don't see how you can compare that to young kids hooking up. I've worked with half a dozen different branches and they have all regularly done co-ed sleepaways for over 20 years at least. I have pictures of them from 1999 myself... wtf are you talking about? And I wasn't comparing anything to anyone hooking up. I was comparing the behavior of normal 15-year-olds with the behavior of a 15-year-old who black…
/r/PussyPass11/03/15 12:27 AM
-2

have you tagged as 'cedartowndawg'
/r/PussyPass10/03/15 11:16 PM
-3

lol.
/r/PussyPass10/03/15 11:16 PM
-26

Your logic is scary... I work at YMCAs and have two younger brothers; I'm a man who is fortunate enough to work with kids and I know what can be expected of them. but what 15 year old doesn't have some serious hormones. He was an asshole, but we all are, male or female, at that age. That is absolute nonsense. After years and years of being a camp counselor (plenty of which were sleep-away camps), nothing I'd ever seen was in the same realm or universe as this. I'm dumbfounded how this sub can ra…
/r/PussyPass10/03/15 11:14 PM
-17

This is kind of cringeworthy. The boy here is 15... By that age, you are intelligent enough to make logical decisions, and that asshole blackmailing her into giving nude photos is absolutely out of this world. This is the first time I've ever been kind of sickened by this sub. I work at YMCAs and have two younger brothers, so I know what kind of behaviors kids are expected to have. I would expect a 15-year-old to get caught with weed at worst, or maybe have an awkward, fumbling relationship. Bla…
/r/PussyPass10/03/15 11:07 PM
-4

It's called blackmail either way. Your 3rd grade word of the day is "analogy". Use it in a sentence three times and then get back to me.
/r/PussyPass10/03/15 11:04 PM
-5

that's fucking ridiculous logic. if someone has a gun to your child's head and says you have to kill another random child or i kill yours, well, you have a choice! it's your fault and responsibility what happens, right?
/r/PussyPass10/03/15 10:51 PM
-3

yeah this is kind of ridiculous
/r/PussyPass10/03/15 10:49 PM
7

yeah, though i personally despise the church and am ex-catholic, i have to admit the non-pedo priests can be a great resource. even a pacifist hires a veteran to defend them.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 05:29 PM
5

I stopped going to Cracked like 6 years ago... it was shitty well before it went white knight.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:53 PM
1

men just want to have sex If they wanted to illustrate that point, they would only need to take a course on biology headed by a nonfeminist.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 04:42 PM
-2

What... of course it is. Vastly left, with some right. It's a 'left' thing, demonstrably, objectively.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 04:54 AM
6

I don't understand OP's title. "Misandrebel article encourages and cheers on women who abuse men" No shit? Kind of obvious...
/r/PussyPass21/02/15 04:16 PM
11

They are literally giving the man those options, lol... FUCK. THIS. SHIT.
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 06:00 AM
0

Not an interpretation. That is literally what they are saying.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:07 PM
1

Do you not know what facing means?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 06:23 PM
1

If she actually gets sentenced to 25 years is another thing entirely. We'll have to see.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:09 AM
3

Sorry, where did RS and UVA get their source from? Was it from the police and investigators themselves? I honestly don't remember, so please cite your source, predating the UVA article, from the authorities.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 07:51 PM
17

Just as staged as the original.
/r/PussyPass27/01/15 10:32 PM
2

"A gentleman wouldn't let his third chin get that distended."
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:29 AM
-1

Which is? Do I have to go inside to find out?
/r/MensRights25/01/15 09:00 AM
24

My mother also took great care of myself and my two younger brothers. She pretty much didn't have a life of her own until two of us left for school. I can't talk to whether she did right by my father, but she honestly did what was best for us at her expense for our whole lives.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/15 08:52 AM
1

How the fuck does that matter to you or anyone? What a massive double standard. Not to mention the fact he is being upvoted for saying nothing more than he hates women for some subjective, perceived reason about what he thinks they think. I thought this was fucking TRP, but I guess it isn't. This thread is full of disgusting BP theory.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 05:29 PM
1

She hasn't done anything for society. She only has "good" genes. Whereas, men actually do things to improve society. Sorry, a man making money, no matter what he does for that money, no matter how immoral... that's doing things to improve society? When did this have to be about improving society? It never had anything to do with improving anything. Likewise, many women put a lot of effort into looking good. Diet and exercise, mostly. There are plenty of 10's out there who are actually 5's becaus…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 10:14 AM
-6

I've had women let me down exactly how you described the men. NAWALt.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 09:57 AM
5

It might get harder, but Dean Karnazes has been improving his ultra-marathon times through his 40s... He literally gets closer to being the fittest human alive with each passing year.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/15 12:51 AM
1

Is seduction anything besides removing all responsibility about the choice from the other side?
/r/seduction13/01/15 10:53 PM
8

Just as it can be difficult pushing forward in an investigation against one's rapist, it too can be difficult to press charges in cases like these. Sometimes there is too much shame, sometimes you want to forget. It's always difficult for everyone involved. Not to mention the fact it was a boy, making it much worse. While a girl might receive little empathy in particularly mean environments, a boy is almost guaranteed to get none in almost every school/neighborhood in the world.
/r/PussyPass11/01/15 06:35 AM
4

Yes.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 06:17 AM
1

There are multiple pictures of him with extremely thin legs. How come mine are bigger than his and all I do for legs is some free squats and long distance running? I won't play the fool. I know a lot of guys who mostly just deadlift... some deadlift 500 pounds and their legs are still smaller than some runners'. The only thing I don't understand is how they insist on calling it "leg day" when their legs are still so small.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 06:45 PM
1

Yeah, sad how obvious it is, even literally on leg day.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 06:44 PM
5

Always hurts to be reminded how much this guy skips leg day.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 02:41 AM
0

But where is the evidence to say it was based on his sex? The evidence is the never-ending stream of passes the other gender gets. One gender is treated one way, and the other a different way. The infinite precedence is the evidence.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 04:54 AM
2

Feminism is 1984ism
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 02:57 AM
5

It's kind of their stated job. Just saying. They are literally tools.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 06:47 AM
0

Unless they got "trained" the night before by Big Marcus.
/r/seduction27/12/14 04:30 AM
3

link to source for this?
/r/MensRights17/12/14 04:15 AM
1

I agree that this is a harsh reality. The problem is that feminism agrees with that reality yet still finds it necessary to make laws against men, believing women have it worse. Men are at the highest and lowest points of society. Such is the reality of human biology. Feminists want a world where women get the benefits of masculinity but without the disadvantages, further hurting the extremely large bottoming-out portion of male society.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 04:05 AM
11

lol.
/r/seduction09/12/14 07:36 AM
1

Plenty of us have known about that particular forbes article for quite a while. I apologize for all the downvotes, but your comment was kind of sort of an attack out of ignorance.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 10:11 PM
2

Yeah, I have no clue what he was saying.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 03:40 AM
2

You're right. A boy, just like a girl, man or woman, deserves better than to be treated like 21st century western men are treated.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/14 09:16 AM
5

Sorry. I was speaking about modern feminists. The feminist movements from the mid 1800s to mid/late 1900s were essential and had equality in mind. For you to claim, "now, the slightest upturn," kind of demonstrates that you weren't aware of feminism's very long history. Today's feminism is entirely different.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 06:56 PM
8

It isn't women, it's feminists. Plenty of men are feminists or are pressured by feminists to do things.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 06:40 PM
5

What the fuck are you talking about? Women aren't the problem- feminists are. The guy you replied to is wrong, too.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 06:39 PM
-1

That's not hypocritical. He's saying the action is set aside only for his 11/10, which is in the "anything goes" territory. You just can't comprehend basic English.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/14 01:10 AM
21

I've never had a girlfriend who didn't specifically ask me to pretend-rape them. Even in high school I had a gf who wanted me to roleplay as a complete stranger.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/14 01:05 AM
3

Actually, feminists pretty much control Wikipedia at this point. I used to be the site's biggest fan and defender, but I can't do that anymore with any honesty.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 09:28 AM
-1

Those that have come are deleted from trp, so you wouldn't see them anyway. Not saying they are right, but yeah.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 02:44 AM
3

this particular video was made to make money. that's why
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:12 PM
-3

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/10/29/catcalling_video_hollaback_s_look_at_street_harassment_in_nyc_edited_out.html
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:06 PM
1

That's fine that it seems that way to you, but there are way more factors involved than even that minorities catcalled more. The most-obvious being that catcalling is 100% okay as long as it doesn't get to stalker-level. As a guy, I get public compliments in public semi-often. It's how the world works.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:06 PM
2

There are way too many factors involved here, and this article misses the point anyway, not to mention the tone of the article and the title here in this post are going for entirely different things.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:01 PM
-8

Well, new york has a huge population of hispanics, and african americans which were the only people cat-calling the Newyork woman Actually, the whites catcalling were edited out. The creators said so themselves.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:56 PM
-7

The video's creator said they edited out most of the white guys. They said it themselves...
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:56 PM
1

most of them
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:20 AM
-1

That actually pleases me a lot. It's great to know an ultra-feminist is scared of me. One reason is that now I know we're not fighting against totally brain-dead subhumans who can't intelligently defend themselves, so I feel better about myself. Another reason is that this means we're doing something right. For equality, and sex education that focuses on biology, not bullshit sociology.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 01:20 PM
2

what the fuck? if your first thought about sex is that everyone who does it must be parents, you don't belong in the 21st century where we have real problems about population and they will never be perfectly fixed.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 04:12 PM
3

And 1980 NOW was how many thousands of members ago?
/r/MensRights19/10/14 09:23 AM
7

Feminists are... mainstream feminist organization ... 1980 I don't think you understand that feminism today and feminism 34 years ago aren't the same thing at all...
/r/MensRights19/10/14 09:21 AM
-2

...which makes it entirely different... for a million and one reasons.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 02:15 AM
-1

lists various studies where people specifically say women with a lot of premarital sex partners make for problematic marriages. concludes these women are bad for all relationships. Because relationships are like marriage
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 12:02 AM
-2

Murders get found out. There is no way to hide that a person is dead. They just aren't there anymore. Rape and false accusations can be easily hidden if done again.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 11:46 PM
9

pre-censorship 4chan? what?
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 05:43 PM
13

Skyfall is actually considered one of the worst by most critics. Casino Royal better by far.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 06:17 PM
1

I have a female friend who is an extremely good confidant. Might be the best I know, even though we are just pen pals. Also sent me tit pics a couple of times- pretty sweet deal.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 04:13 PM
-1

What's closer to thoughtcrime than wordcrime?
/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:16 PM
5

I believe you are smarter than she is and won't make the same mistake. It is nothing to do with intelligence. A conscious decision can be made in the woman's best interests- hypergamy. You are talking about honor.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 06:34 PM
7

so honorable, so respectable, so desirable.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 06:31 PM
1

But is it higher or lower than 100% of other genders?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:43 PM
2

the pirate bay?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:42 PM
3

Pretty big mistake, but I guess we'll assume that was it.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:43 PM
5

Christina is actually proactive in preventing a male supremacist movement What does that have to do with your first sentence?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:19 PM
2

This never even got big and half of them were joke posts or just fakes/reposts...
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 02:19 PM
0

Or girl friends who are basically bros. That's definitely possible...
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 02:33 AM
-1

Um... nah. He's just rich and famous, not to mention that specific actions he took severely dropped his overall value. Sure, a lot of girls liked him even more after he beat up Rihanna, but quite a lot more were turned off. Therefore, besides being a violent person, he is also decidedly not Red Pill.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 05:45 PM
2

There are definitely exceptions to the rule. There are all sorts of reasons one wouldn't want sex enough at any point in life, but most of the time, most men want sex. Whether you share a strong bond with someone, so strong that you need to be with them on that deep, personal level, or whether you would just rather level a hundred Warcraft characters, anyone can have their own reason for not having sex.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 05:41 PM
2

PCG turned to shit almost a decade before reporting on gender issues, though. PC elitist fucks. I subscribed to them for years while they were totally cool with "the Xbox mag guys down the hall". They were arguably one of the best gaming magazines in the world. Hilarious, insightful, friendly, trustworthy reviews, NOT PC elitist, but still a PC magazine.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:59 PM
15

Women sleeping to get ahead? That happens in the real world. Not every day, but it does happen. It absolutely happens every day. What made you think otherwise? lmao They have every right to do that, but lying about it and fucking people over, which happens almost as often, is when it becomes fucked up.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:56 PM
1

Yep. There is a local place called "Pho King"... yep. yep.
/r/seduction16/08/14 05:48 AM
2

A beta would not want to admit that he threw away $780 K. Beta/alpha? More like just extremely rich.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 03:15 AM
2

If he is anything like a lot of guys, he is being courteous in telling you he has been there (since it is your bathroom). Otherwise, he's basically sneaking around and you would never know he used it otherwise (assuming no other tells).
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:36 AM
0

It's already been said, but a lot of the men wanted to fight/ fought for glory/pussy/because it was the "manly" thing to do.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/14 04:25 AM
1

I tried spamming yes while watching some tv for like 30 minutes... must have been hundreds to over 1k swipes. Shit's broken. I live in a college town where girls talk to me first (so I really don't need it, but it could still be useful... in theory?).
/r/seduction07/08/14 04:45 PM
0

I've used pictures of me that would get random likes and comments on facebook from people I have never met, but then gets absolutely nothing on tinder... the image is from a time I used to get catcalls on the street. Sorry... not buying it. Tinder is broken for some people. Maybe it's some android devices, maybe just bugged at random times.
/r/seduction07/08/14 09:25 AM
27

Seriously. I want his number already.
/r/seduction07/08/14 09:23 AM
1

Even running uses the bicep a little.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 04:45 PM
2

mistakenly assumed This is the new narrative... that the blue pill behavior of decades was all just a "mistaken assumption" that no one in the world had a part in purveying.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 03:30 PM
1

You sure? It's easy to forget the girls you said "nah" about.
/r/seduction17/07/14 07:03 AM
5

few larger cities in America, but my experience has been that you drive to the city and then walk or take a cab or rail or bus. What cities? I've never seen anything like this anywhere in Los Angeles.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 03:48 PM
16

It's too dry for you; nothing wrong with that.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 08:55 AM
4

The highest-voted comments have nothing to do with the extra credit. Ghostrider22 has a point.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 11:04 PM
2

The gay rights movement and New Atheism have a lot in common, and gay rights-related articles are posted every day on /r/atheism. With every post come countless... people... who ask what the article has to do with atheism. The answer is that New Atheism is much more humanist than any Abrahamic religion and is therefore more accepting of the LGBT community.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 01:07 AM
2

What does institutionalized homophobia- initiated and almost entirely propagated by religionists- have to do with atheism? Gotta love it
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:53 AM
7

Most of feminism throughout history and, indeed, some today has been quite necessary in the fight for egalitarianism. However, most of feminism today- especially western feminism- resembles more the lobbyist group of institutionalized victimization than anything else, and the only equality represented is that men are equally at fault for this iteration of feminism.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:49 AM
3

Who hasn't been banned from there? I was probably banned after 2 posts.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 08:07 AM
2

I see so many black guys with massive game that I wonder if they are TRP, but think they can't be. But who knows?
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 10:32 PM
12

Few things are on the same level as murder. Being enslaved is very close, and so many people have and continue to kill themselves in such situations.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 10:26 PM
-1

I'm confused about your comment. It has nothing to do with the comment it is replying to...
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 09:28 PM
2

I've also had since-disowned friends who argued to me that the Catholic Church's lobbying for shorter statute of limitations for the purposes of protecting their pedophiles actually helps the victims somehow. Talk about convoluted.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 09:04 PM
2

the lead female is often a very mediocre or even a slightly below average girl. Of course, she looks attractive, because this is fictional media where all the characters have attractive actors/actresses playing them. But in order to let the maximum number of female teens relate to the lead female character, they typically make her have slightly below average intelligence and a ton of other bad characteristics (suffering from a broken home, depression, drug problems, etc). Of course, in these sto…
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 08:05 PM
1

thanks
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:38 AM
19

As much as people here want to deny it, TRP and MRM are intertwined at at least some level. My generation has been lied to from birth, at least... and male feminists are just as much at fault.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:40 PM
1

What? Gave money to whom? Game is about saving money... looks like some people got scammed.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 06:06 AM
1

That's not what I was saying. The point is that it is an extremely influential children's show run by mostly men. This is a good thing for everyone, yet flies in the face of -you guessed it- PRF popular feminist rhetoric.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:04 PM
-1

There is almost no such thing as a neutral term; they are almost always negative or positive in connotation.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 09:22 PM
0

You literally just took my statement out of context for the sole purpose of criticizing it if it weren't in precisely the context you took it out of. Watching you attempt to argue is like watching an interpretive dance about autism. Edit: I smelled a default-dweller and was fucking right. ffs, the retardation is palpable.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 04:18 AM
0

Thanks for backing me up. FFS, claiming 22 and 23 is the norm is absolutely ridiculous. The only thing I disagree with is that people don't take kindly to anecdotal evidence in this subreddit. That's literally what this sub upvotes the most. You probably haven't been here very long. Take 10 seconds and look over the voting patterns of any thread at all.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 11:29 PM
-13

Oh gosh. Yeah, I really have nothing to say to that. The fact you're bringing up extreme fringe cases means reason won't be heard in this thread. I'll take my downvotes and leave before this normally sensible subreddit embarrasses itself further.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 07:12 PM
2

What article today?
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:47 PM
-11

Not gonna lie, but that relationship would weird me out if I were to see it in person. From a man's mid-20s and on, generally we are attracted to the same thing when it comes to matured females. Not to mention it only takes a handful of years so the youngest possible high school teacher is double the age of a graduating student. A small percentage of females have matured a few years ahead of the average, by that time. I'll give this cousin of yours the benefit of the doubt, though you never actu…
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:45 PM
1

You found Democrats much more appealing... when their biggest concern was fighting against abolition? Wait what?
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 03:52 AM
0

Thanks for the example. But it's just one. Honestly, I was trying to catch someone in the trap of a newer western Constitution, but no one bit.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 12:43 AM
-1

If you can't provide a single prior example from a constitution-like legal document, why did you say that a constitution shouldn't be timeless?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 05:41 PM
0

I asked for specific examples from the country you currently live in. You failed to provide a single example. Edit: I'm also cautious, but that's beside the point.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 05:26 PM
-1

An impossible task? What country are you from, and do you have any examples from that country about legal ideals which aren't timeless?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:40 PM
-2

link to your poll, please
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 02:14 AM
2

What? When did Dakrys assume that?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 06:06 AM
12

Go over patriarchy again for me, please.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:55 PM
0

but if you think it's to fight with feminists, I think you're missing the point. Equality doesn't mean you have to put someone else down wrong on all counts, and you will never have any evidence to back up your claims about equality. have a nice day
/r/MensRights21/04/14 08:32 PM
5

7, likes boobs!
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:33 PM
15

TNG was a fantastic show, but generally, everyone outside of the biggest Trekkie circlejerkers believes Wil was one of the show's weak spots. He shows himself to be a douchebag here, but with regards to the show, it wasn't his fault. The fact that a kid was used on the bridge of the Enterprise was just a huge joke.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:32 PM
1

They're really going full retard. But this is Cracked we're talking about here. A shit site through and through. Half if not more of everything they post is bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:28 PM
0

Freakin scary. Ever wake up inside of a closed bathroom, with the light off, thinking you're a Left4Dead zombie who just spawned there?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:12 PM
3

I literally just posted a story about this about 2 days ago, but a mod on this sub had it removed for no reason whatsoever. The exact same story except that it was posted earlier and not by Wil Wheaton. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/22xfop/everydayfeminismcom_staff_writer_not_mentioning/ Explanation is in the comments, and you can find out more just by looking for the original poster through the tumblr link provided on my original post.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:51 PM
1

The creator of the original content removed it- this morning- because people had immediately challenged her on it. This all happened on her personal tumblr, which I did not link to. I intentionally excluded this information for the same reason I left out the content creator's name- because I didn't want my post to be removed for doxxing. Aren't you supposed to be a moderator? For what other reason do you think I wouldn't have posted the original content? Your actions here honestly make no sense …
/r/MensRights13/04/14 06:08 PM
1

To answer your question: obviously, yes, absolutely. Denying that is denying that modern, mainstream feminism and Men's Rights Activism are at odds, which demonstrably undermines the cause. And I have no clue whatsoever what you're talking about with regards to this being previously posted... It's my understanding the original post from the EverydayFeminism staff writer was made this morning...
/r/MensRights13/04/14 05:15 PM
1

Not appropriate? Fair enough. Do you have any suggestions about which subreddit, if not r/MensRights, would be an appropriate place to post things about r/MensRights?
/r/MensRights13/04/14 04:39 PM
2

Thanks. This demonstrates how skewed and out of proportion all the fake statistics were.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 04:10 PM
4

that's kind of fucked up to say, regarldess of how many downvotes I get for defending an anonymous female child.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 03:19 AM
-4

None of those have anything to do with the Brady Handgun Act and the fact that it immediately resulted in thousands of lives not lost the following year. This is indisputable evidence. This is my argument. Please stop it with the straw men.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 09:32 PM
-2

the Handgun Act of 1993 vastly reduced homicides- immediately.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:48 PM
-4

I actually condemn it because of evidence- the Handgun Act of 1993 vastly reduced homicides- immediately. American gun culture has successfully undone that work.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 07:50 PM
-8

American here and I've seen someone shot to death in the street, known several people who have been shot in the street and my father (a white mechanic) once fought hand-to-hand with a gun-wielding assailant outside of his home and won. Fuck American gun culture. Seriously, fuck it.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 06:24 PM
1

That's just the thing. We knew that at least the girl had no knowledge of a physical threat, or else there would not have been an argument before the gun was pulled on the boy. This is all assuming the father and girl are telling the truth about the boy eventually 'reaching for something', which I'm not sure is the case.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 06:21 PM
3

You didn't answer the question... or is the problem with women having casual sex that you love it? What? That makes no sense. And I don't find it amazing that someone doesn't care if you're fucking someone else. It seems 100% perfectly reasonable that a fuck buddy has an opinion or no opinion on whether or not you have others. This isn't new, surprising, or unique of a situation.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 08:13 PM
-4

There is always a trade-off, huh? I can't understand why the fuck you care what someone else does, if it doesn't affect you. You're a judgmental asshole, to be perfectly honest, and I'd be extremely surprised if you weren't devoutly religious. If someone has the biological urge to sleep around, who the fuck cares if they do, or how or when they do it? Even if it kills them, why do you care?
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 08:09 PM
-5

Sorry, I've no clue what you're talking about. What's this thing I have, and why is it relevant to the topic of women?
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 08:09 PM
-4

Your point being?
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 08:08 PM
-2

Do you not realize that your entire premise is that sex is somehow invalid if not for reproduction? Are you... Catholic?
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 06:50 PM
4

By prospective mates, do you mean short term or long term?
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 06:01 PM
-11

Every man who works does it for a reason Wtf does this even mean? I have no clue at all what you're talking about. Prioritize work over life Define what you mean here by 'life'
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 05:42 PM
4

What's wrong with women having casual sex?
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 05:36 PM
2

Businesses should be allowed to do business as they please. If the public doesn't like it, they won't give that business their money, and the business will either have to adapt or die. Unfortunately, this is not how it has ever worked in the real world. You are describing an alternate reality. In this reality, institutionalized bigotry is readily profitable.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 01:31 AM
5

How is an unborn child a woman's body? I honestly don't understand.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 07:51 PM
0

If you want to think of it that way, sure. Exception*
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 07:24 AM
0

No shit? What, do you think a relationship is supposed to last forever? Or even a very long time? I've got news for you... humans don't work that way.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 07:04 AM
0

Marriage doesn't factor into what I'm talking about. And... wait, a red pill got married? Why would he do that?
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 07:02 AM
2

They objectively aren't. You can disagree if you like, but I can only assume the relationships I've had are possible with other people as well.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 07:01 AM
1

I would never get married. Did I say something about marriage?
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 06:59 AM
8

Oh. Besides the fact that I've had every kind of relationship I've wanted...? Is there something objectively wrong, or even impossible about what I've described? Please, enlighten me about how I actually haven't had the relationships I know I've had.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 06:58 AM
-16

If you know a person on a very deep level, male or female, you certainly can share fears, failures, etc. Some relationships do work out that way.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 03:44 AM
2

That subreddit looks fantastic. I'm sort of new to TRP and MRA stuff, but I find that most of it rings true. I have a couple Asian friends who are cool dudes but I'm not sure if they would care much or be into it, but that Asian sub seems like it could maybe interest them. But I'm not sure. How would I go about sharing that sub, especially to people who have basically never used reddit?
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 05:10 PM
1

The two are actually somewhat similar ideas, it's just that there have been very few truly great, humanitarian leaders and to make it one's goal to buy them off would be pretty difficult. It isn't the money shouldn't be a factor, it's that it decidedly isn't a factor.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 09:01 PM
1

I didn't understand the whole situation. All is understood now.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 06:49 AM
0

I read it as being legal, so was a little confused. I also didn't realize the child died as well. Yeah, this case is inarguably fucked up.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 06:49 AM
2

Arrested for... what? It's the doctor's own right to make moral decisions of their own. Who are you to judge if a doctor feels it is wrong to take the life of one human so another can live?
/r/MensRights11/02/14 06:30 AM
5

Nonsense, all of that. The reason is because someone has to be in power to make the decisions, and such a person simply would not make choices in the company's favor if they didn't get paid a lot, because anyone else could simply pay them off. It still happens a lot, but much less than it would.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 06:28 AM
10

Egalitarianism is anti-feminism. That doesn't make egalitarianism anti-female.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 09:13 AM
8

A lot of feminists actively work against MRM. There is really nothing we can do but take a stance against something trying to destroy us.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 09:12 AM
-3

TRP is great. Had never seen anything like it before but had realized TRP theory on my own, a while back. It's really hard to argue against biology.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 09:08 AM
-1

Because this sub isn't extremely angry (and rightly so) as well. Double standards, double standards everywhere.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 09:08 AM
2

You pull on them- you are always a burden. Living like that for life is not viable. You feel worthless, and you know that everyone around you knows that, and then all they strive to do with their time is to make you feel better. Depression, no self worth, contempt. Suicide.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 05:41 AM
18

... and the exact same can be said for the other gender. You don't seem to get the point at all.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 08:24 PM
0

What was that about? They deleted their comments.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 08:03 AM
-5

The problem is that a society where women aren't judged at all for having many sexual partners is impractical. Instinctually we've evolved as a species to have negative connotations about it due to it's correlation You're saying nature says we must judge women for having many sexual partners. I'm saying nature is wrong. Nature didn't plan for overpopulation.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:00 AM
-14

Instincts matter much, much less in an overpopulation situation where we are only beginning to plan getting bodies to live on another planet. Sorry... that logic doesn't work out. Nature didn't plan for an eventual inability to get off this rock. Which is a real possibility.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 07:48 AM
4

I'm pretty sure they're trolling. There are more and more like them every day on this subreddit. The only thing we can do is ignore so they go away.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 07:34 PM
-1

I'll get to your question once you fucking get to mine. Now, stop wasting our time and make like a closet feminist and never cite your source. Still waiting on you to resolve your failure of logic when you said MRA was bad by our logic. Still waiting. Edit: Sorry, seeing you trying to divert attention away from my clear question in an attempt to waste my time was annoying. So you think MRA's are the opposite? I assume you mean that ideologically, since we don't have any of the institutionalized …
/r/MensRights15/01/14 07:27 PM
-1

Wait a second. A counter to something bad is equally as bad? How so? We are not the opposite, we are the counter. Please go over your logic again. And... as a whole they do both work for equality Every single time someone comes on here and says Feminism works for equality, I always make a single, simple request: Please cite your source. 100% of the time, I never get a response.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 07:08 PM
0

You are demonstrably incorrect about mainstream feminism. This is also in response to your other comment about "true feminist" working towards the same goals as us. No, sorry, you're totally making this up and it has no basis in fact. Cite your sources if you actually have something positive to say about feminism. But you won't cite them, because they don't exist.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 06:44 PM
0

I've met a lot of guys who really believe this, too. That not identifying with mainstream feminism automatically makes you bigoted and sexist. Whenever I'm reminded of how many people hold this belief, I feel physical pain.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 06:36 PM
-1

I don't understand your point at all. I've had close female friends who speak like that... who gives a fuck? It "just doesn't sound right"? Great argument.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/14 12:43 AM
1

Standart?
/r/MensRights09/01/14 12:29 AM
6

What? Explain exactly how there is no gigantic double standard on display here.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:11 PM
11

A study was done in one county, therefore the myth is debunked? Eh... no. Snopes isn't the end-all be-all of internet debunking. It's basically just an average joe who is decent at googling things.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 09:34 AM
1

For a "feminist"s subreddit, they sure are obsessed with MRAs. How have you not realized what a huge double standard your post is?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:56 PM
1

What an unfathomably dumb comment. Congratulations.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:58 AM
2

Oh, and the discrepancy in sentencing between men and women in some instances. Some?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:39 AM
3

Did I rant?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:56 PM
43

It all sparked debates spanning well over 1000 comments across several threads, so only a handful are pictured here- Legend: 1 is the main feminist leader, calling out misogyny left and right and lying and trying to get people banned from a group where we talk about gaming and game news 2 feminist friend who is more intelligent but spouts literally dozens of double standards and lots of the same misogyny-baiting (not pictured here) 3 some weird dude I've never seen speak before in the group ever…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 09:03 AM
2

If your theory is actually applicable to humans, then as AboveAFC pointed out, why is the number of obese (men and women) so rapidly growing? Do you really know if proportions to median and average weight is actually changed at all from, say, 500-1000 years ago?
/r/TheRedPill19/12/13 04:21 PM
1

There it is. The most retarded thing I've read in my time in this sub.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:58 PM
1

And is compelled speech and is wholly unconstitutional. This is essentially the Catholic Church's biggest argument for covering up all their child rape over the past century. Congratulations, LibAtheist.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 02:55 AM
7

The vast majority of mainstream feminism asserts that men cannot be victims. You can deny it to yourself if you like, but no one in the Men's Rights Movement is ignorant enough to believe that narrative.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 05:24 AM
5

false alarm
/r/MensRights08/12/13 06:31 AM
1

this was all implied
/r/MensRights02/12/13 09:50 AM
2

You do realize that if your opinions were the rule, a generation from now there would be no business environment. No human life = no business environment. Crazy, huh?
/r/MensRights29/11/13 11:11 AM
5

No True Scotsman Institutionalized misandry is demonstrable, but all feminists do is deny it or ignore it, even though feminism is a large part of the cause. Go ahead, if you're really not one of those people, try stepping out of the box. For one moment, try not denying misandry or ignoring it. You'll be cut up by your fellow feminists faster than a speeding divorce proceeding. It happens every day. Go ahead and try, if you're truly different. But you aren't, so you won't.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 07:36 PM
14

Because it has worked countless times and will continue to work. A lot of the time, we simply never know when it was all a lie unless the liar comes forward. Innocent men are in prison, right now, and will serve their entire sentence.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:43 AM
-2

It had nothing to do specifically with religion... I was obviously referring to the culture, which treats women as subhumans- a culture which was pervasive throughout all cultures, historically. Reading comprehension is hard. :/ Edit: How the living fuck How puerile...
/r/TheRedPill17/11/13 02:37 PM
5

No, they don't. Which is why there are so many downvotes. A lot of the upvotes are probably just people who upvote everything (very common on TRP).
/r/TheRedPill15/11/13 10:23 PM
8

Uh... this article is pretty bullshit multiple times throughout... Is this supposed to be a joke?
/r/TheRedPill15/11/13 10:23 PM
1

Sorry, but you're totally wrong. Junk food down at the cheap store near my house I can get for 500 calories per dollar. Nothing but a huge, economy-sized 5+ pound chunk of pure cheese offers that kind of value. And that would contain even more fat calories, obviously. Try again.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/13 05:03 AM
2

It's not just extremists.
/r/seduction29/10/13 01:51 AM
2

It definitely is the norm, lol. Without a doubt.
/r/seduction29/10/13 01:50 AM
3

yet it can be won and lost forever...
/r/seduction17/10/13 12:53 AM
1

Figured this out on my own. Strong way to get fast interest in you.
/r/seduction23/07/13 02:12 AM
1

"Think of a girl in your lifetime that you had zero romantic feelings for. Maybe a co-worker or school friend you weren’t attracted to. If she hung around you and then automatically expected you to hook up with her, how would you feel? Would you sleep with her just because she was nice to you? I don’t think so." Whole article falls flat on its face here.
/r/seduction20/07/13 02:22 AM
2

Clowns that only let you know Where you let your senses go Clowns all around you It’s a cross I need to bear
/r/seduction03/07/13 04:45 AM
-1

lol'd, so true.
/r/seduction03/07/13 04:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter