TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

63daddy Archive

View 25 posts and 9,449 comments by 63daddy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
631

General63daddy/r/MensRights07/10/23 09:20 PM
294

False Accusation63daddy/r/MensRights16/11/22 07:59 PM
251

Anti-MRM63daddy/r/MensRights14/06/22 06:23 PM
251

Discrimination63daddy/r/MensRights06/11/25 07:31 PM
189

Feminism63daddy/r/MensRights18/11/24 09:54 PM
147

General63daddy/r/MensRights05/12/25 05:30 PM
146

Discrimination63daddy/r/MensRights30/09/23 06:07 PM
127

Edu./Occu.63daddy/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:55 PM
113

Discrimination63daddy/r/MensRights13/08/22 12:20 PM
101

General63daddy/r/MensRights14/11/23 04:48 PM
91

General63daddy/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:01 PM
89

General63daddy/r/MensRights06/11/25 10:37 PM
79

False Accusation63daddy/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:57 AM
68

General63daddy/r/MensRights03/08/23 08:30 PM
66

False Accusation63daddy/r/MensRights21/02/25 03:46 PM
65

Legal Rights63daddy/r/MensRights27/06/23 07:49 PM
60

Discussion63daddy/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 03:11 PM
38

Progress63daddy/r/MensRights11/10/23 07:01 PM
36

Social Issues63daddy/r/MensRights01/02/24 04:58 PM
33

Feminism63daddy/r/MensRights16/06/22 06:48 PM
32

Discrimination63daddy/r/MensRights28/06/23 12:12 AM
26

General63daddy/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:13 AM
16

General63daddy/r/MensRights16/09/21 10:11 PM
13

Discrimination63daddy/r/MensRights27/01/22 11:30 PM
2

Discrimination63daddy/r/MensRights05/01/22 09:33 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 9,449 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Yes. When we hear the term rape we think of forcible rape with a definite no from the victim, but statutory rape is also rape. In most college rose cases, both parties admit consent was given, claiming the consent wasn’t valid making it rape.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 04:19 PM
7

More men than women going into politics does not a patriarchy make.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/26 01:37 PM
6

“AI” is only as good as its programming. It finds what is on the verb which is often biased.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 02:11 AM
26

But typically they give a definition inconsistent with reality, falsely claiming feminism is about gender equality. Why enter a discussion based on a false premise?
/r/MensRights26/07/26 12:33 AM
26

I respond: “I believe in gender equality which is of course inconsistent with the feminist agenda to advantage one sex over the other”
/r/MensRights26/07/26 12:31 AM
24

I’m amazed more people don’t get this. We live in a system where women have more votes, where there are no restrictions on women running for public offices and in which politicians focus on winning the women’s vote, passing policies advantaging women over men. That’s not a patriarchy and it’s not focused on what’s best for men. Where I disagree with you is regarding patriarchy being a side effect. We don’t live in a patriarchy, so it’s not a side effect, it’s non existent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 09:49 PM
5

Yeah. Britain has gone from a world power to almost a third world nation, largely because of it’s woke agenda.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 09:19 PM
79

I love the arguments people make to deny their discrimination or advocacy there of. Making people stand in the back due to their race and sex is clearly discriminatory. Trying to justify such discrimination doesn’t make it non discriminatory.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 05:15 PM
8

As the article says, there is no male birth control pill. Women can get an abortion, take the morning after pill, put a child up for adoption, none of which are generally available to men. Women have reproductive rights, men have reproductive responsibilities. I think what’s changed is more men are seeing how easily they can get tricked into parental responsibilities and how incredibly expensive and life changing this can be. A vasectomy might not be something young men really want, but compared…
/r/MensRights24/07/26 05:52 PM
2

I can have a laundromat wash and fold my laundry for about $40/month. What does tree trimming, cleaning gutters, mending a broken fence or dealing with a plumbing issue cost? There’s no comparison to the value of work men vs women provide on average.
/r/MensRights24/07/26 03:32 PM
4

MRAs have won presumption of joint custody legislation in several states. A couple states were successfully sued for denying male victims of domestic violence the same resources female victims receive. Under fear of lawsuits, colleges have cut back the female only scholarships available. Trump partially overturned Obama’s incredibly biased title IX mandates. (But Biden reinstated them). A federal judge ruled a women only selective service to be unconstitutional. Unfortunately, Congress decided n…
/r/MensRights22/07/26 01:40 PM
6

The SCUM Manifesto which advocates the end of men has been translated into many languages with millions of copies distributed world wide.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 05:38 PM
41

The point is the hope that more objective people listening will see the facts.
/r/MensRights12/07/26 04:30 AM
6

Colleges prefer women 2:1 in STEMs https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4418903/ There are a number of executive orders and bills collectively known as affirmative action that advantage women over men in job hiring. Add to that DEI policies favoring women. The preferential treatment towards women in job hiring is easily uncovered with a simple internet search. It’s amazing the theories people will come up with to avoid addressing the documented discrimination against men. It’s the same with …
/r/MensRights11/07/26 04:54 PM
7

In the U.S., feminists have won many laws that advantage women over men and are not equal. Lobbying is after all about getting politicians to pass laws favorable to the lobbying constituency. Of course, feminists spin these female advantages as if they are somehow equal because that’s an easier sell.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 04:14 PM
7

It goes far beyond that. Many countries have special initiatives to combat violence against women snd highs despite more violence against males. Some make the killing of a woman (femicide) a worse crime than killing of a man. The UN focuses on female victimization. Relief aid to Haiti only provided food to women, not men. We often see reports of war torn areas indicating something like: “More men killed, women most impacted”. Clearly societies care far more about with well being than men’s. Men …
/r/MensRights11/07/26 12:30 PM
6

“A new study published in the Journal of Marriage and Family adds to this research by examining how women’s educational advancements in recent decades have impacted marriage patterns among newlywed heterosexual couples. It found that “the tendency for women to marry men with higher incomes has persisted.” https://ifstudies.org/blog/better-educated-women-still-prefer-higher-earning-husbands
/r/MensRights11/07/26 02:17 AM
36

Far more men are murdered than women, yet the “epidemic” is women being killed, men’s deaths apparently not mattering.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 10:11 PM
32

The problem is women’s hypergamous desires are unrealistic these days. For decades we’ve been advantaging women over men in education, in job hiring, in business ownership and more. This makes it difficult for women to marry up as they desire. They “can’t find each other” because what women want in men overall doesn’t exist. For decades, feminists have been fighting for women to be artificially more successful than men. You can’t have that and still marry up.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 01:54 PM
60

Yeah. We certainly don’t live in a system where power is passed from father to eldest son. However even the more “modern” political definition where a patriarchy is a system of rule by men that excludes women clearly isn’t our political system. Women can run for any office, we have more women voters than men, feminism has a very strong lobby. Women simply are not excluded in our political system, rather they are being pandered to.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 06:08 PM
30

Boys are falling behind compared to girls in terms of subjective grading by teachers and going into college. They aren’t falling behind with objective, standardized grading. In short, boys are being discriminated against in education. We actually passed legislation to focus on girls to the detriment of boys in education, but most people seem to want to ignore.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 01:58 PM
38

You mean the high school team that beat the women’s pro soccer team?
/r/MensRights09/07/26 12:24 AM
43

I never claimed we won a World Cup. I said the men’s team is objectively better than the women’s in terms of talent and revenues. Sorry the facts don’t fit your agenda.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 12:05 AM
59

They were beat by a team of young amateur boys. They bring in significantly less revenues. So yeah, they aren’t as good as men.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 11:53 PM
2

Yeah. If they were open about their man hate and desire to advantage women, then they’d have a harder time winning said advantages.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 03:51 PM
5

The “study” misrepresents treating men and women equally as feminism. In other words the entire thing is based on a false premise so all the results mean nothing.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 02:31 PM
7

Yes, and I similarly experienced there were higher expectations on men. Women could leave early and nobody cared. If someone had to come in over the weekend, it would be a man.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:27 PM
7

This sub is one of the few places I see discussion on the actual root causes of issues actually addressed. So many articles and speakers are afraid to mention the discrimination men face and especially reluctant to acknowledge his feminism had pushed for much of that discrimination. There aren’t course sine knowledgeable women such as Casey Jaye, Christina Hoff Sommers, Erin Pizzey and. Karen Straughen who have done a great job in addressing discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 03:18 AM
18

More men watch women’s sports than women. The point is that it’s predominantly women who are failing to support female movie rolls and female sports. I’m not saying women should support these, but it’s ridiculous to blame men for a lack of female support.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 03:14 AM
6

Clearly once women and men were guaranteed equal voting rights over 100 years ago, one couldn’t claim women were excluded. Also keep in mind that when the U.S. was founded only 6% of the population could vote, some of which were in fact women. The vast majority of men had to say. The idea men (most men) had a say while women were excluded wasn’t true even then.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 01:46 PM
49

No. In a patriarchy women are excluded from the political process. In our system women are not excluded. Women have equal voting rights with more eligible women voters than men. Women can run for any public office. Another way people participate in the political process in by lobbying, feminism having a very strong lobby that has successfully won several laws advantaging women. We do not live in a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 10:47 PM
1

Overhead severe the reason women’s prisons cost so much more per inmate is newer, nice facilities with far more allocated space per inmate than male prisoners are afforded.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 07:42 PM
10

Yeah, I see that all the time. Young men who ask women out risk getting called creepy or even being formally accused of harassment. It should come as no surprise young men are less willing to ask women out, but few are willing to acknowledge the actual cause at play. It’s much the same with boys falling behind in education. Few are willing to address the discrimination against boys that is well documented, many even blaming boys for the discrimination they face. It’s disgusting.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 07:22 PM
22

Just today I once again engaged a feminist, pointing out the many policies of discrimination against men that are a result of feminist lobbying efforts. She of course claimed that polices of discrimination against men aren’t actually discrimination. I assume that like most feminists and many people in general, she believes discrimination doesn’t count as discrimination if they feel it’s justified. Of course everyone who advocates discrimination against others tries to justify it. “I promote disc…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 07:13 PM
37

Take a home two people enjoy and split it and divorce and both parties are “worse off”, that’s the nature of splitting up. Importantly, this notion is based on the idea everything is joint property. If a woman gets to live in a man’s luxurious home for free for 10 years is she really worse off if she didn’t get half its worth in a divorce? She had rent free housing for a decade.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:54 PM
18

This is the problem I’ve read about. Few men own their property outright prior to marriage and it’s easy for a woman to claim she contributed to it in same way. Such laws don’t offer the comprehensive protection many assume they do.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:50 PM
12

I’ve named specific policies of discrimination and you simply refuse to acknowledge the facts. There’s nothing I can do to make you stop denying facts that don’t suit your feminist agenda. Look, the fact that women owned advantage program advantages women is right in the name. Colleges practicing affirmative action in admissions was made illegal by the Supreme Court, but affirmative action for women in job hiring remains legal and common. Again, there’s nothing I can do if you simply wish to den…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:42 PM
12

Comes as no surprise to me you simply deny policies of discrimination against men. I’m sure that’s a coping mechanism to feel better about being part of an anti-male movement.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:34 PM
13

Affirmative action was originally just for minorities. Feminists got women added as an advantaged group, disadvantaging men. (1960s) Women’s educational equity act, focusing on girls to the detriment of boys in education. (First passed and funded in 1974) Women owned business advantages VAWA Men subsidizing women’s healthcare under Obamacare. Title IX mandates that deny accused college men basic due process procedures. The book, “The Fraud of Feminism”. (1913). Addresses how even then feminism w…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:05 PM
15

Many of the laws that discriminate against men that the men’s movement wishes to make gender neutral were won by feminist lobbying efforts. Major feminist organizations have lobbied for and won many laws that discriminate against men, it’s not just a few radical feminists that are anti-male, it’s mainstream feminism.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 12:20 PM
26

I worked in higher education for decades so have seen this change first hand. It’s really not complicated to understand. Decades ago, young women generally liked being asked out, and very politely declined if not interested. Today, if a woman isn’t interested that makes a young man a creep or potentially even facing sexual harassment allegations. At the same time young men see it’s harder than ever to meet women’s expectations and they are more aware of that most marriages don’t work out and wha…
/r/MensRights28/06/26 10:35 PM
3

We have something like 5 government agencies for women’s heath, vs none for men’s health. 20 some women only health mandates under Obamacare, no men only. Men subsidize women’s healthcare. Some of the largest health studies ever done focus on women.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 01:39 PM
13

I suspect you are just trolling/rage bait. Men aren’t privileged in jobs hiring. Women are privileged under affirmative action and DEI hiring. Colleges favor women 2:1 in STEM hiring. Employers pay women just out of college more than men. The things you mention aren’t only inaccurate but aren’t matters of privilege. There are many laws privileging women. Name a couple privileging men.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 12:52 AM
28

We have had affirmative action for women, actively favoring women over roughly equal men for decades now. In addition, it’s common to hire and promote women over men under DEI. Colleges prefer women 2:1 in STEMs. (Source). Employers pay women just out of college more than men just out of college. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4418903/ It’s amazing anyone still buys the idea men are somehow favored in job hiring when clearly women are favored in many ways.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 04:11 PM
4

Well said and their logic makes no sense. Men are killed at far greater rates than women so if there’s one sex that is being killed because of their sex it statistically makes sense that’s men, not women. I’ve certainly read that many criminals have a code of not killing women, but of course killing men is okay. Congress recently considered making women subject to selective service but the idea women might be out in harms way was too unthinkable. Be Their claim that there’s a huge problem of wom…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 04:41 PM
32

I’m not a fan of the death penalty, but when you go to another country you are subject to their laws. She shouldn’t be treated softly for being a foreigner or a woman.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 04:41 AM
3

You are halfway there but still missing the point. As you said, men are mostly killing other men. Therefore, women aren’t more at risk, men are more at risk, as actual crime data clearly indicates.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 02:15 AM
27

It’s true that men perpetuate more violent crime than women, but they do so primarily against other men. Men in the U.S. are murdered at 4-5 times the rate of women. Women are in fact not at greater risk. The arguments you quote try to incorrectly conflate victimization with perpetration. A victim is a victim regardless of the sex of the perpetrator. A man killed by another man isn’t somehow less dead as feminists insinuate. Sure, I’m happy to agree there’s some merit in investigating why men pe…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 01:57 AM
3

Violence against men is an epidemic. Men are 4-5 times more likely to be murdered than women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/26 10:38 PM
9

I don’t think it’s so much that young men are strongly drawn to the Republican Party as it’s that the Democrat party has been alienating them and they have nowhere else to go but the right. After the last election some politicians on the left acknowledged this as did some left leaning news outlets like CNN, but the proposed solutions I’ve seen have no real teeth. I think if the left actively supported equal rights for men and opposed discrimination against men, the young men that left, would flo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/26 10:36 PM
7

This is a topic that especially infuriates me. Males killed more but somehow females most victimized. It shows how little society cares about male lives.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 09:09 PM
10

Among other things she used this technology to spy on people undressed where they had an expectation of privacy, yet her punishment is only one day in jail? Imagine if a man was caught using video to spy on women unclothed. I can’t imagine he’d get off with a single day in jail.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 08:50 PM
3

A big part of political systems is inherent gynocentrism and feminist lobbying efforts.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 08:16 PM
5

I’ve already answered that. The article could have mentioned specifically why investors/police believe this is murder and not self defense, but the article makes no mention of that, choosing instead to focus on and support her claim that it was self defense. It’s very biased reporting.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 07:18 PM
2

I get that. My point is that exactly where you fall in terms of strength is mostly irrelevant. Whether you are a little stronger or a little weaker than average, you still face 5X the chance of being murdered that a woman does. You keep acting as if how you compare to other men is central, when it’s not.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 07:10 PM
8

Great way to combine a couple different topics, showing how feminists are willing to argue completely opposing points when it suits them. (As well as feminist leaning media).
/r/MensRights25/06/26 07:05 PM
6

Well, then you haven’t been paying attention. News sources often refer to cases where someone is arrested for murder as murder. They typically only take the side of the accused when that’s a woman.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 07:04 PM
9

Most domestic violence isn’t gun violence. I don’t know the breakdown of methodology by which women initiate violence, but many studies show women initiate more domestic violence than men. Certainly, if it escalates, women are more likely to get the worst of it, but the idea men’s physical strength is the root cause simply isn’t true, given women initiate it more. There are many men stronger than me, it doesn’t mean I’m a victim. A Ukrainian man sent to die in war where women are exempt is a vic…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 06:43 PM
7

Women initiate more domestic violence than men.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 06:35 PM
26

The fact the Australian government has become very misandrist has been clear to me for over a decade.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 06:09 PM
5

Sure that can happen, but that doesn’t negate the obvious fact a man in poor health is less likely to marry, more likely to get divorced and also more likely to die earlier compared to a man in good health. Unhealthy men both dying younger and being more likely to be single doesn’t mean marriage increases lifespan. Claiming so is a correlation fallacy.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 06:06 PM
8

AWDTSG is essentially a copy of MeToo: it’s a way to accuse men without evidence knowing that man will likely face hardship for the unsubstantiated allegations against him.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 06:02 PM
9

What they could report is the reasons the police feel it was murder and not self defense. They don’t report that but rather dedicate the vast majority of the article to her self defense claim. They could have framed the article in the context of a man murdered and woman arrested for that murder, but again they instead focus on her attempt to justify the killing. It’s clearly not just speculation. Police and whatever their version of a DA is typically don’t press murder charges based on pure spec…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 05:55 PM
57

Here’s a case of the UN pressuring the UAE to waive a death sentence of a woman who killed her employer, but funny how we rarely see anyone argue the same for men convicted of murder. I similarly read an article saying how inhumane it is of Saudi Arabia to execute women, totally ignoring the fact are more men are executed. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2017/03/un-experts-urge-uae-quash-death-sentence-against-woman-migrant-domestic
/r/MensRights25/06/26 05:48 PM
3

The point you are missing is that physical strength is simply not the most notable factor in victimization. The vast majority of deaths have absolutely nothing to do with physical strength. Again, if it was about strength, 80% of murder victims wouldn’t be male. A Ukrainian soldier killed by a drone didn’t die because of his strength or lack there of, he died because he was forced to put his life at risk where women were exempt from such risk. By claiming that your lesser strength makes you inhe…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 05:34 PM
4

My initial point is that physical strength in this day and age isn’t the primary risk for victimization. Again, men are murdered far more than women. Anyone no matter how strong can be shot, can be hit on the back of the head with a skillet when they aren’t looking or be stabbed when they are sleeping. A strong man killed by a drone attack is just as dead as a weak man or a woman. Don’t support the feminist narrative that it’s all about strength. Men are discriminated against regardless of stren…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 05:12 PM
10

Feminism has proven time and time again that it seeks to advantage women over men. The advantages they’ve won, disadvantage all men regardless of their physical strength. A woman getting a job over a man under affirmative action has nothing to do with strength. A woman owned business getting the contract just for being women owned has nothing to do with strength. Men subsidizing women’s healthcare has nothing to do with strength. Etc., etc. You aren’t subject to feminist pushed discrimination be…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 04:57 PM
27

I don’t know any man that’s stronger than a bullet. Men are murdered at 4-5 times the rate of women in the U.S., so obviously men’s greater average strength doesn’t mean they are victimized less.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 04:35 PM
7

Sure, some feminists will acknowledge male victimization but the overall feminist push is to portray women as victims and men as perpetrators as a means to focus resources for women and justify discrimination against men. Consider the feminist Duluth Model for example which states almost all victims are women and most perpetrators men, despite numerous studies showing women initiate domestic violence more than men do.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 03:57 PM
13

The idea that a man being married increased lifespan is a correlation fallacy. Men in poor health are more likely to remain single, more likely to be divorced and more likely to die at a younger age. It doesn’t follow that being married causes longevity. It makes much more sense that a man who is in good health is more likely to be married and live longer whereas a man in poor health is more likely to be single and not live as long, this consistent with all the data.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 03:50 PM
28

That’s for a court to decide, but the article is focusing almost exclusively on her claim it was self defense, giving almost no coverage on the reasons she’s been arrested for murder. It’s very biased media coverage.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 03:14 PM
4

Sure, but let’s face it, that’s not how censorship and cancel culture works. Woke agenda, including feminist agenda, no matter how inaccurate gets a voice, while legitimate criticism of it gets silenced.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 09:08 PM
21

Yeah, but sadly a lot of “ child support” ends up getting used like alimony.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:06 PM
44

We started advantaging girls over boys in education 50 years ago, affirmative action for women at about the same time. Now many businesses advantage women over men in hiring and promotion under DEI initiatives. It’s funny how articles such as this try to blame the most ridiculous ideas for the change rather than acknowledge the obvious impact discrimination against males is having.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:04 PM
87

Saying women divorce because they can is an understatement. It’s often very lucrative for them to do so. You can get if a husband usually got his wife’s wealth in divorce and if most alimony was paid from women to men, we wouldn’t see 70% of divorced initiated by the wife. The purpose of marriage is for men to provide for women and that’s especially true in divorce.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 05:43 PM
1

We don’t live in a patriarchy, and it would be more accurate to say we live in a democratic republic than a democracy. The article is based on a false premise about the society we actually live in.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 04:12 PM
20

Seeing a prostitute or having a sugar baby costs a defined amount of money up front, but lacks the risk of giving up half of all you earned. I’ve read many sugar daddies say that having a sugar baby is way cheaper than marriage and divorce.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 04:04 PM
26

Well, I imagine next will be a guy and girlfriend stay together over the weekends even though each has their own place and that becomes grounds for him to pay her. It wouldn’t surprise me if a decade from now, simply having a relationship with a woman is legally grounds to owe her money.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 02:57 PM
1

What policies have independent, centrist politicians influenced? None. In the U.S., laws are pushed and passed by democrats and republicans. There are almost no independent politicians in office.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 01:51 PM
87

This is ridiculous and frustrating. Legal marriage is a contract, (a biased one). Inviting a girlfriend to live in your house is not such a contract and shouldn’t be treated like one. It’s amazing how they sell a women taking a man’s wealth as “financial stability”, and it says much about how society views men.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 01:45 PM
8

I think both parties pander to the women’s vote, but the left does so to the notable discrimination against men whereas the right is more of a mixed bag. The right, being conservative was more vocal than the left about not equally requiring women to register with selective service, but most actively anti-male legislation has been pushed by the left. Trump, at least to some degree, overturned Obama’s anti-male title IX mandates. Trump has strongly fought against discrimination under DEI which inc…
/r/MensRights19/06/26 02:49 AM
6

The bottom line is women work less because society is hypergamous. Women can work less and be supported at least in part by a husband. Consider: a wife who stays home is referred to as a stay at home wife. A husband who stays home is called a deadbeat. I think there are historical reasons why most societies are hypergamous and gynocentric, but the bottom line is, most people would prefer to work less but women are more able to do so. I know of many stay at home wives who said they’d go back to w…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 09:54 PM
4

According to the.bureau of Labor Statistics: “On the days they worked, employed men worked 52 minutes more than employed women.” If one factored in stay at home wives, the hourly gap would be even more. https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2015/time-spent-working-by-full-and-part-time-status-gender-and-location-in-2014.htm
/r/MensRights17/06/26 09:49 PM
21

“It all men, but always men” is just plain false. There’s no crime or bad behavior that isn’t perpetrated by women at times. Almost every day there’s a post here about a woman committing statutory rape (and often getting an incredibly light sentence) Saying men do something like commit rape is the nadir fallacy. It’s blaming all men for the action of a few. Individuals, not all members of a sex commit crimes or bad actions. Feminists have to claim it’s men as a sex doing bad things to women as a…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 09:46 PM
4

I’ve seen that a lot. It seems to me a lot of people that address male issues feel a need to defend feminism, even if feminism is the cause of the problem.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 12:00 PM
11

Yep. No guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. No jury of one’s peers. No right of discovery. No right to face one’s accuser or even hear what they are telling the “judge”. It’s not even a kangeroo court.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 10:29 PM
26

As already mentioned, female sports reporters are allowed to stay in the men’s locker room but the reverse isn’t true. Another one few people talk about is the controversy over men entering women’s locker rooms claiming to identify as women while nobody seems to care about the reverse.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 10:11 PM
52

Women’s educational equity act is one if the main reasons boys started falling behind with fewer going to college. Title IX sexual assault mandates under Obama and Biden deny accused college men the most backside process rights. Many colleges have lots of women only scholarships but no men only scholarships. Colleges prefer women 2:1 in STEMs study shows. It’s sickening to claim men haven’t been discriminated against in education when the discrimination is well documented. Clearly the author mus…
/r/MensRights15/06/26 07:23 PM
5

But that’s what’s screwed up here. Women initiate more domestic violence than men yet makes are being told they’re the problem and they need to cater even more to women.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 04:46 PM
11

To add insult to injury, they point to how many women are involved in domestic violence as an excuse for this, not mentioning of course, women initiate more domestic violence than men do. Women initiate more domestic violence than men, so let’s change men (starting as boys ) to accommodate that: Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 12:57 PM
7

What amazes me is it so much how many people are ignorant but absolutely refuse to acknowledge discrimination against makes even when confronted with clear evidence of that discrimination. An example that comes up often with me is the Women’s Educational Equity Act and the documented negative impacts it’s had in boys in education . It’s documented legislation with books focusing on the negative implications of it, yet even mothers with sons deny it, apparently not caring their sons are being dis…
/r/MensRights14/06/26 01:43 PM
2

Russia. Though it’s an organization, not a country supporting fathers. (Congress isn’t referring to a branch of government as in the U.S.).
/r/MensRights13/06/26 06:36 PM
8

Sometimes a man’s worth is his ability to fight and die for country.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 04:04 PM
9

Some good observations in there. One difference however is that while employers are turning more and more online to find and screen candidates, online dating is declining, with more and more people dating through real life connections again.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 06:06 PM
7

It makes no sense to say women have stopped approaching men because it was never the burden of women to approach men, that’s always been on men.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 04:52 PM
8

If you look at the group rules you will that despite the title, topics don’t have to be about “rights”. Actual rule of law does strongly play into this. College men being accused and judged under title IX kangaroo courts, EEOC standards allowing most anything a man does to be construed as sexual assault, biased child custody and financial awards: These are all very much a part of this issue.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 03:02 PM
20

Some good points but the article really underplays the impact of discrimination against men including: Young men are far more aware that most divorces end in divorce and that are likely to be stripped of their children and money when that happens. Simply asking women out can count as harassment these days putting one in notice, possibly even being expelled from college or losing a job. Of course men are more cautious about asking women out. Sure, society is more friendly to bachelors, dating app…
/r/MensRights12/06/26 02:09 PM
10

Sad to see colleges passing off feminist agenda and other woke narratives as legitimate education. Colleges that do that should lose their federal funding in my opinion.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 01:57 PM
3

I find this sickening. The law should be gender blind. The sex of the victim and perpetrator irrelevant. The same with criminal sentencing. Women shouldn’t get lighter sentencing than men for the same crime, yet they do in most countries.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 10:30 PM
7

There are entire books dedicated to chronicling how education has been transformed to cater to girls and the detriment boys have suffered as a result, yet despite this and despite the common sense that children aren’t suited to sit attentively for hours on end, many act as if the issues boys experience is some great mystery. I think people will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid acknowledging discrimination against males.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 05:32 PM
22

When I was in school, I walked or rode my bike each way. We had gym classes that were very physical. I went out and played or walked home over the lunch hour. Science classes had labs that were hands on. Classes included more experiential learning which boys favor to be replaced with linguistic learning which girls favor overall. If I had been forced to sit and be lectured to for hours straight as is common today, I’d have been ADHD for sure. We’ve altered school and life in general to cater to …
/r/MensRights11/06/26 02:47 PM
5

Thanks for continuing to prove my point about how you refuse to acknowledge discrimination against men. Covering screenings for women’s cancers but not men’s is clearly discriminatory. Obviously you understand this, it just doesn’t suit your agenda.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 07:48 PM
1

I get that, but given they don’t link or name any actual legislation, it’s impossible to judge if that legislation is a violation or not or guess what defense might be used. My guess is the defense will argue FGM and male circumcision are not the same, equal procedures. Thanks for the link. I think their saying religious circumcision is okay is problematic however. First because if it’s a decision only adults should make, that should include religious reasons. 2. If there’s a religious exemption…
/r/MensRights10/06/26 07:45 PM
3

Let’s face it, you just don’t want acknowledge discrimination against men or at least you want to justify it. Mandating free counseling for women but not men Is just plain discriminatory. Mandating covered cancer screenings for women but not men is just plain discrimination. Policies that discriminate against men are not a matter of my opinion. They are discriminatory legislative acts, acts you simply don’t want to acknowledge.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 05:53 PM
4

As for the discrimination under WEEA, I suggest you read “The War Against Boys”. It spells out the specific discriminatory changes very well. Typically, insurance companies have charged higher claim groups higher premiums, such as men being charged higher auto premiums. It’s discriminatory to say that’s allowable when men have higher claims but not when women have higher claims. The ACA also mandated over 20 women only coverages but no male only coverages. Women initiate more domestic violence t…
/r/MensRights10/06/26 05:15 PM
19

I find liberal states and especially college towns to be most feminist. Conservative states and especially suburbia and rural America to be less so.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 03:22 PM
8

I agree feminism didn’t create a male only draft or selective service. Feminist organizations did lobby for and win: Affirmative action for women, advantaging women over men in job hiring. Women owned business advantages, disadvantaging male owned businesses compared to women owned. VAWA: Treating domestic violence as gendered rather than treating all victims equally and making presumptions about who initiated the violence. Women’s healthcare advantages under Obamacare. Women’s educational equit…
/r/MensRights10/06/26 03:13 PM
16

Most feminists including male feminists aren’t open to facts, so it’s more productive to focus your points in those who are more objective. Even when I engage feminists, my intent isn’t to get them to accept facts, my argument is really aimed at others who might be paying attention.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 02:28 PM
2

Consider the feminist Duluth Model another poster mentioned which asserts men perpetrate most domestic violence despite many studies showing the opposite to be true. This bias not only means men are more likely to be presumed guilty and arrested when in fact the woman is the perpetrator, but it means the wife likely remains in the house with the kids. This in turn biases child custody and awards. It’s not just about helping or not helping victims based on sex, it has implications well beyond tha…
/r/MensRights10/06/26 02:22 PM
5

This government website details how the government is focusing on female victimization rather than equally focusing on all victims. https://genderequality.gov.au/working-for-women/priority-area-1-gender-based-violence That despite the fact government survey information shows men report being assaulted at more than twice the rate of women: https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-05/rip07.pdf
/r/MensRights10/06/26 02:07 PM
2

I can’t find any reference to any huff vs Colorado lawsuit actually being filed. I can’t find anything citing what law specifically they feel violates Colorado’s equal protection clause. Even if a lawsuit successfully showed a law restricting FGM to be unconstitutional, that doesn’t do anything to limit make circumcision, it simply would overthrow the law restricting FGM.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:54 PM
27

At least on Reddit, LWMAs tend to support feminism and are not very receptive to discussions of how feminism has created much of the discrimination men and boys face. It’s hard to effectively advocate for men’s rights, if one isn’t willing to acknowledge the source of the problem. An example of this outside of Reddit is Reeves and his supposed advocacy of boys in education. He is similarly unwilling to publicly talk about the negative influence of feminism on education, which leaves his proposed…
/r/MensRights09/06/26 07:28 PM
53

I’ve seen actual studies that count misogyny as: Any criticism of any woman. Advocating men have equal rights. Facts about feminism
/r/MensRights09/06/26 01:44 PM
9

A rape culture is a culture that condones or even promotes rape. That’s almost non existent. In most cultures, deviant confined but rather is a very serious crime. A possible exception to that is there are some U.S. states such as Georgia that legally don’t recognize rape of men. One could argue that failing to legally recognize male rape victims is a form of condoning.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 07:43 PM
2

They’ve already sued and won. The problem is Congress, not the court.
/r/MensRights07/06/26 06:28 PM
4

We disadvantage boys in favor of girls under the women’s educational equity act, favor women over men in business ownership under the women owned business advantage program, discriminate against men in job hiring under affirmative action. We deny male victims resources under VAWA, put men’s health behind women’s under Obamacare and with many government health agencies just for women. Female criminals get lighter criminal sentencing. Only men have to register with selective services. Most states …
/r/MensRights06/06/26 01:19 PM
2

It doesn’t go against what you write, it expands in what you wrote.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 07:01 PM
7

What defines indecent exposure varies based on jurisdiction. In most places, women can go topless where men can so long as it’s not sexual activity. A few years ago the 10th circuit court over ruled a case of women being fined for simply going topless. Men being able to go topless where women can’t is perhaps a privilege for men in a very few places in the U.S. Even there one could argue it’s not a privilege because breasts are considered sexual for women but not men. Touching a woman’s chest is…
/r/MensRights05/06/26 03:29 PM
8

Well said. Feminism pretends to advocate equality even if course it advocated women be advantaged. To win advantages it spreads disinformation which is sadly often just accepted as true despite evidence to the contrary. They use censorship, ad hominem attacks, etc to protect their disinformation.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 02:37 PM
3

Again, thanks for showing that advocating others be discriminated against is still alive and well. Imagine if half the grocery stores forbid women to create make safe spaces, if half if gyms stopped allowing women, if half the schools became boys only while the other half remained coed. Same thing.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 01:21 PM
3

You justify men be denied bus access for the protection of women. That’s no different than justifying denying blacks access to places for the protection of whites. They’re both simply excuses to discriminate. Congrats to you for your part in keeping discrimination alive and prosperous.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 01:28 AM
4

We need bus spaces for whites only that don’t allow black people to keep whites safe from blacks. We need bus spaces for women only that don’t allow men to keep women safe from men. Same basic discriminatory argument, just different demographics substituted. We never seem to get past justifying discrimination. Thanks for providing an example of that. A problem of course is that half full busses are available but MRM are forbidden from using them, having to wait and be late as a result.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 10:17 PM
2

Yeah, the violence against women act includes all sorts of things that aren’t actually acts of violence.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 12:20 AM
15

I recently read “The Fraud of Feminism” published in 1913. The author points out how even then feminists were trying to make social issues gendered as a means to benefit women. He spoke quite a bit as to how they pushed for women to receive lighter criminal sentencing rather than hold all perpetrators equally responsible regardless of their sex. In order to win practices advantaging women and disadvantaging men, social issues need to be portrayed as gendered and gender biased. Of course the iron…
/r/MensRights02/06/26 11:58 PM
2

Well as I said, I could use their same defining actions and show most every man has been a victim of battery hundreds of times. It’s misleading.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 11:49 PM
6

As I suspected the moment I started reading the report, the survey doesn’t actually measure reported incidents of intimate partner violence. It doesn’t ask men if they committed intimate partner violence. Rather, it asked about specific actions such as slapping or pushing and the “researchers” decided to count any such acts as domestic violence, all without the woman in question even claiming they are victims of IPV. (Page 16). This is a trick feminists often use to over inflate violence against…
/r/MensRights02/06/26 02:19 PM
10

Much like making black people sit in the back of the bus, but worse: Black people were at least allowed on the bus. Promoting discrimination is as common as ever. We’ve just changed whom it’s justified to discriminate against.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 02:29 AM
7

If we were to talk about discrimination against boys in school, they’d not manipulative because it is in fact boys that are being discriminated against. When they talk about violence against women and girls, it’s very manipulative because it’s ignoring the sex that’s actually victimized more. Focusing only on girls when it comes to HPV is similarly sexist, since the virus has harmful implications to males as well. Why should we only care about immunizing females from the harmful effects of this …
/r/MensRights31/05/26 02:41 PM
7

Fails on two counts: Most men aren’t going around being violent. “Men” as a sex don’t commit violence, individuals or groups of individuals commit violence.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 06:59 PM
2

Look any state code anemone will see that’s simply not the definition of rape. Even if it was, we don’t live in a patriarchy so it’s an argument based on a false premise.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 04:51 PM
15

Yeah, boys are doing worse when one looks at performance measures subjectively awarded by teachers, but do a bit better than girls on objectively graded standardized tests. I wonder what could possibly cause that difference?
/r/MensRights22/05/26 09:40 PM
6

Yeah, feminists love to spew revisionist history and sadly far too many people just accept it, despite fairly easy to find facts to the contrary.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 05:36 PM
46

That’s a huge part of the problem. Many so called human rights organizations are really just female advocacy groups.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 04:20 PM
17

So they rely on men. Where is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/26 01:31 AM
63

Female queens were as happy or more happy to engage in wars than their male counterparts. I’d love to see a bunch of feminist misandrists go try to start their own society on an island somewhere. Men could even help build it, but once established they couldn’t rely on men at all. No products men played any part in making could be imported. Any services would have to be provided only by women. I’d love to see how that would go.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 12:14 AM
17

One of the segments is entitled something like hie incels impact dating. Of course Icels are a result of dating dynamics not a cause. This topic reminds me of boys falling behind in education: Surely such experts understand that young men are understandably reacting to the discrimination they face, but nobody seems to have the guts to publicly say this.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 10:38 PM
4

She makes good points about creep and blaming men, but she completely omits the biases of divorce and family law and that it’s typically women who profit from divorce and men who typically pay. You can best if husbands received their wife’s wealth and men most typically were awarded alimony, women wouldn’t be so quick to file for divorce.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 02:52 PM
12

There’s even a men’s lib sub that doesn’t allow relevant, factual information that reflects poorly on feminism.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 01:10 PM
41

As the reporter said at the end, this is sadly becoming more and more common. Though I my guess is that it’s not simply becoming more common. My guess is this happens because historically female teachers got away with such crimes and I bet that’s still the case. These teachers don’t expect they will get caught. Despite the many, many cases like this in the news, I bet there are far more that never come to light.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 10:04 PM
1

I think this is largely true and don’t get the downvotes. Believing women are much, much more vulnerable and need to be guarded is absolutely social conditioning to use your words. It is not born out in actual crime data. The many answers in the linked post reflect this. Answer after answer claims women need to be more worried about their safety but not a single answer I saw supported this contention with any supporting evidence. I agree with you that this has been taken to the point where absol…
/r/MensRights20/05/26 09:53 PM
7

I’m not denying the biased nature of what she advocates. I’m saying that’s only the tip of the iceberg regarding discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 07:48 PM
19

My former supervisor was asked to step down from his managerial position to be replaced by a far, far less experienced black woman. Not only unfair to him but the department is now dysfunctional as a result. Fortunately I’m no longer there. This goes beyond subtle leaning in. Many company’s take pride in blatantly discriminating against men.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 07:22 PM
9

Privacy codes vary and exactly at what point surveillance becomes an infraction can vary. From what I can find Poland’s privacy code regarding video monitoring reads: “changing rooms, restroom facilities, breakrooms or common spaces, nor in premises made available to trade union organizations, unless it is necessary to achieve permitted purposes and techniques are used that prevent people from being identified.” (See source below). Note that last phrase starting with “unless” is very subjective …
/r/MensRights20/05/26 03:11 PM
4

No, that’s not how the lawsuit was settled. Also, that’s irrelevant to the problems caused by going from all boys to allowing girls. https://nypost.com/2023/04/19/boy-scouts-exits-chapter-11-bankruptcy-after-abuse-settlement/ https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/boy-scouts-america-girl-scouts-settle-trademark-dispute-over-co-ed-scouting-2022-07-23/
/r/MensRights20/05/26 11:08 AM
5

They’re not helped by the Girl Scouts. Despite the similar name, they are completely separate organizations.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 10:57 AM
9

Yeah, that’s a big part of the problem. It’s men that fought the wars to protect us, who build most things, grow most food, etc. They ignore all this and more. One that often fines up is women doing more home chores than men, claiming this to be unfair to women, but of course this ignores the fact many couples agree to this as a trade off to the husband being the primary income earner, providing the home, groceries, vehicles, etc. What’s more important, having a home or keeping it tidy? It also …
/r/MensRights20/05/26 01:19 AM
36

Yes, when fewer women than men went to college and grad school, it didn’t crate a problem because that’s consistent with hypergamy. Fewer men now going to college and grad school creates more dating and marriage issues in large part because it’s inconsistent with hypergamy. Men are expected to be providers. Purposely holding men back and disadvantaging them in the workforce is inconsistent with that.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 12:50 AM
81

This article accurately mentions more women now going to college, but like so many articles, videos and podcasts fails to mention the discrimination responsible for this change. It fails to mention that when fewer women why to college, it didn’t create a marriage problem, so why is it a problem when fewer men go to college? ( they neglect to mention the relevant impact of hypergamy). College men who ask women out risk being accused of harassment, same with men in many workplace environments. Of …
/r/MensRights19/05/26 11:43 PM
39

Most posts I see here are good about pointing out what feminists do and not blame all women for the actions of feminism. There are a fair number of posts about women [teachers] raping their male underage students. While this may at first appear to be women bashing, I think the point is that by posting these when they happen, which is often, it shows that this is in fact a problem, opposing those who claim such crimes against boys are incredibly rare. Sure, there are some people who blame all wom…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 11:17 PM
7

I agree. Just because men in women’s sports obviously ruins the competition for women doesn’t mean women in men’s spaces isn’t an issue. Also consider that most professional “men’s” sports aren’t actually exclusive to men but will allow any qualified women. Equality dictates that if women’s sports are exclusive to women then the same should apply to men’s sports. Allowing girls in the Boy Scouts has caused all sorts of problems.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 07:37 PM
1

My girlfriend constantly asks me to do house projects for her she’s incapable of doing. While that clearly shows she values me, I’m not sure it’s in my best interest.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 04:30 AM
9

Feminist organizations which are of course true feminism have shown time and time again they are not for gender equality. They have continually fought for women to be advantaged over men. We of course don’t live in a patriarchy. Women are not excluded from the political process. They are free run for any office, they have more voting influence than men and a stronger political lobby.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 11:23 PM
24

Politicians set the system up. Lobbying, including feminist lobbying is inherent to most any system. People will try to influence politicians and the political system to their benefit. The fact politicians set up the political system prior to feminism doesn’t negate the discriminatory nature of feminist lobbying efforts. Men as a sex didn’t set the system up. The vast, vast majority of men had no say in how our political system was set up and again lobbying is inherent to most any political syst…
/r/MensRights13/05/26 11:19 PM
5

Identity politics in general but patriarchy theory and critical race theory specifically are heavily influenced by the oppressed-oppressor theory some call cultural Marxism advocated by the Frankfurt School. The left tends to buy into and advocate these identity politics theories more than the right does.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 02:38 PM
13

Typically Nadir fallacy: Blaming all men for the actions of a small minority. I think how to respond depends on the audience. Feminists typically will never accept facts, so time presenting facts is wasted. If you sense there are more reasonable readers, then redound with facts.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 04:28 AM
2

Women initiate domestic violence twice as often as men according to some studies. When things escalate however women often get the worst of it since men are typically stronger. Dues this really equate to men being more violent?
/r/MensRights11/05/26 04:49 AM
2

I think it’s well documented that the Frankfurt School’s cultural Marxism strongly influenced feminist patriarchy theory and other identity politics movements.
/r/MensRights10/05/26 02:39 PM
7

Feminists lobbied for education to advantage females. MRAs wanting to end discrimination isn’t following feminists. It’s the opposite of advocating discrimination. Sure, some young men are rightfully concluding a college education doesn’t help them overall, especially given the biases against males. It doesn’t follow however that we shouldn’t try to eliminate it reduce the discrimination. Young men are of course free to go to college or not, but should be able to make that decision in an environ…
/r/MensRights10/05/26 02:13 PM
46

It’s the overall gynocentrism that bothers me more than any single gynocentric manifestation.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 02:24 PM
19

Thus is a really good point. We’ve already seen people conceived by sperm donation successfully get the name of the donor despite guarantees of anonymity. We’ve also seen cases of men donated sperm privately sued for child support. Entrusting a third party to safeguard viable sperm carries the risk of becoming a father and bearing those costs.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 12:54 PM
16

It’s based on parity in previously male dominated areas viewed as positive. In other words, discriminating against men in these areas to achieve more equal numbers is seen as “equal”, while only men being sent to die in wars is ignored as are female dominated fields like nursing.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 03:32 AM
5

I think capitalism adopting feminism (affirmative action for women, DEI, etc., ) is essentially social capitalism. It is integrating a social program (supporting women) into a capitalist framework. I think it has its limits. A company can only create so many jobs for women, can only pass by so many competent men, can only pay women so much more for the same work before it impacts the bottom line too much. The more companies are pressured to advantage women, the farther it can be pushed, but stil…
/r/MensRights04/05/26 01:53 PM
25

Women. We have numerous laws advantaging women over men, almost non that could be seen as privileging men. On top of formal privileges for women, they are advantaged in practice. Courts go easier on women, they favor women in child custody, they are more likely to get out of speeding tickets, etc.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 03:11 PM
2

It has impacted me, but even if it hadn’t, turning a blind eye to hatred and discrimination only allows it to grow and some day it might impact you. Your friend will have a very different view if one day he’s fired to make way for a woman under DEI goals or he finds himself falsely accused. Then there’s caring about others. I’m living in a place and at a point in my life where I’m unlikely to be hugely negatively impacted by misandry anymore, but I still care about other men that are in more vul…
/r/MensRights01/05/26 04:40 PM
18

Men as a sex have no political power. Politicians, a majority of which are men creating something isn’t the same as men having created that thing. If a committee is 2 women and 1 man make a controversial policy decision for Google does it mean the women of Google made that decision? Same thing. Added: Their argument is the apex fallacy.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 03:34 PM
1

I was thinking of all three of those even though none of them probably identify as anti-feminist, they all recognize feminism isn’t about equality and is actively anti-male. They are essentially anti-feminist even if they won’t frame themselves with that phrase.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 03:59 AM
1

I’ve been in my current relationship for nearly 2 years and see the issues you speak of getting stronger and stronger. My girlfriend is pretty good at not expecting me to just pay for everything. The financial issue is more about your first point: Most of the things we jointly spend money on she values and I’m neutral or maybe even negative on. The money goes to what she wants, not what I want. I definitely value my free time more, but more and more of it gets sucked away. I feel that going to v…
/r/MensRights01/05/26 03:53 AM
3

Pro: It provides resources primarily for women who have been victimized by violent crime. Con: By focusing on female victims many male victims have less access to victim resources. By focusing on female victims it reinforces incorrect idea that it’s mostly men who initiate domestic violence and mostly women who are victimized by it. My opinion: government programs should not discriminate or have a gender agenda. Any program that is sexist should be amended to be gender neutral or eliminated. We …
/r/MensRights01/05/26 03:35 AM
14

Your comment makes me think of this: Feminists have strongly been fighting against presumption of joint custody laws, obviously wanting mothers to have custody, yet they hate the very real implications this has. If a woman wants sole custody, she needs to accept not just the positives that brings but the negatives as well and one negative is that it might make her dating life more difficult.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 02:00 AM
4

Most of what I’ve seen on the topic pretends to be for men on the surface but in the end is either belittling men or encouraging them to date down even more in order to support women. I get where you are coming from. You raise a good perspective.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:08 AM
13

Having seriously dated a few single mothers, I generally agree with your assessment. One thing I’ll add is that an under age child should be the foremost priority for a single mother. I respect that. That is however a notable added complication, a complication I don’t care to deal with. I’m now seeing a woman with no kids. I can’t imagine ever again dating a woman with dependent children.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:04 AM
4

The study I linked shows teachers are simply harsher on boys, not just because they misbehave more. We should design schools based on the realities of where girls and boys are at, which isn’t entirely the same for boys and girls. Under WEEA, schools were encouraged to teach in ways abc at times best suited for girls. Shouldn’t the goal of education be to recognize and practice educational techniques that optimize what both girls and boys can learn, based on the realities of how they can learn? I…
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:29 AM
10

If you shift your a discussion to why you are not an incel, then they have successfully distracted the conversation away from a point you had them in. If they call you an incel, respond with something like: “Of course I’m not an incel, now answer my question about men and women being equally subject to selective service”.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 10:11 PM
15

Your example of a feminist calling you an incel is an ad hominem attack. They can’t refute your point so they turn to insulting you instead. It’s the same with calling someone a misogynist pig, etc. I think the best way to handle ad hominem attacks is to laugh them off, maybe make a quick witty comment back, but get back to the point the feminist is trying to avoid. Their point is to draw attention away from the subject at hand. Don’t let them.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 09:46 PM
5

Here’s an article based in a study showing boys are disciplined far more and that teachers are harder on boys, but sadly it doesn’t provide any specific numbers. https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-06-22/boys-bear-the-brunt-of-school-discipline
/r/MensRights30/04/26 03:30 PM
12

Certainly there are lonely men out there but the epidemic idea is way over rated for agenda reasons. One basic flaw is in assuming that being unmarried equates to loneliness and that being married means one has a vibrant and fulfilling social life. Some of the loneliest men I’ve known are unhappily married. Many single men are single by choice, feeling that the available women don’t offer a net benefit to them. Advising these men to lower their standards even more isn’t helpful, it’s counterprod…
/r/MensRights30/04/26 02:53 PM
8

Where I worked, if a woman or minority declined a job offer, they would often offer more as an enticement under their AA/DEI goals.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 01:11 PM
8

I did when I worked in a woke college environment, not so much now. I definitely know men in unhappy marriages that feel like they are in a prison of their own creation with no way out.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 10:34 PM
3

I think this brings up a great point that it’s not just about time spent but effort and hardship vs enjoyment. I absolutely hate shoveling heavy wet snow during a snow storm, cleaning gutters, or laying a patio. I’d gladly trade these 5:1 against doing laundry.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 10:32 PM
21

Read the link by _name_of_the_user. It explains several ways in which such information is silenced.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 08:46 PM
24

That’s a really great article. For others: This documents that there have been many, many studies showing that intimate partner violence is fairly symmetrical, but also goes into how this fact has been largely silenced and misinterpreted for agenda reasons.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 08:42 PM
7

I’ve lived on my own most of my adult life and find home chores to be very easy compared home maintenance, improvement projects etc. These days modern conveniences like vacuums, dishwashers, clothing washers, etc., do most of the work. I now have a girlfriend and often make the bed, coffee, breakfast and dishes while she’s getting ready for work. It’s no great burden. Now, I’m sure if one has several kids, a couple in diapers, etc., then taking care of the household becomes much more work.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 08:14 PM
22

Good find.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:38 PM
87

I’ve found that many of the studies I’ve had bookmarked that showed discrimination against men or showed that unequal representation isn’t due to discrimination (such as pay gap) have been removed. It makes me curious as to how they got removed. Here’s a study showing domestic violence is highest in lesbian relationships followed by heterosexual relationships with gay make relationships having the least, consistent with the idea women, not men initiate more DV. https://aifs.gov.au/resources/prac…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:38 PM
2

Yeah. One can argue about how unfair hypergamy is all they want, but hypergamy is nothing new. What’s changed is we’ve artificially elevated women and held men back making hypergamous desires less achievable. If we’d stop advantaging women and stop holding men back, it would return to its natural order.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 06:59 PM
20

Of course supporting feminism is bad for men. I think your last point (about your friend) is an interesting one we don’t talk about much and that’s the dating and marriage issues caused by artificially elevating women in a hypergamous society. We advantage women in education, in job hiring in business ownership and more. We’ve elevated them over men to a point they simply can’t marry up as they desire, so they complain there’s no good men out there. To your main question, many men look at this a…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 03:46 PM
7

I strongly agree. Red shirting is an attempt to slightly lessen the impact of discrimination against boys in education when what we should be focused on is eliminating the discrimination. For most of history, boys weren’t falling behind in evocation. Boys didn’t magically become stupider over the past few decades, what changed is the discrimination against boys in education and that’s what needs to be addressed.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 05:14 AM
1

What the OP makes clear is he had requested to know the details of the accusations against him but won’t be given this. He is being treated as if guilty without being given any opportunity to make a case for his innocence. Regardless of what the OP may or may not have done, the problem is people adopting a presumption of guilt rather than a presumption of innocence, which of course will result in abuse.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 04:39 AM
22

I suggest you read the book: “The War Against Boys” by Dr. Christina Hoff Sommers. She chronicles among other things how feminists won legislation (women’s education, educational equity act) that encouraged K through 12 education to focus on girls to the detriment of boys. It worked! Add to that things like no boys allowed college prep programs, women only scholarships, biased title IX mandates, etc. For decades we’ve purposely been advantaging girls over boys in education, yet people seem baffl…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 04:26 AM
49

Sorry for your situation. This is an example that it’s not just women making accusations that’s the problem, it’s people treating those accusations as true without any finding of guilt or even evidence.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 12:29 AM
19

It’s not about that survived case. That specific case is irrelevant to overall issue which the author sums up in the last paragraph. Let’s say you live in a large city that is contending more and more crime and give an example of your neighbor being robbed. Whether or not you can prove your neighbor was robbed or not has nothing to do with the underlying problem of crime, it’s simply an example you can relate to. It’s the same here. The counselor is relaying a personal experience as an example o…
/r/MensRights28/04/26 08:29 PM
1

Years ago, I read a piece by a former FBI agent who theorized many serial killers that were never caught were women. His point was that when the hunt focuses on middle aged men as suspects, they are much less likely to catch the perpetrator when it’s a woman. More women getting away with it, in turn supports the stereotype that it’s mostly middle age men and rarely women in a never ending loop of self fulfilling presumptions.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 08:17 PM
23

It’s not the argument, it’s just an example. You can throw that example out if you want and it doesn’t change the point of the article.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 07:38 PM
21

It’s an account of a conversation. What do you expect, a recording of the conversation? That particular conversation itself isn’t even that important to the point, it’s just an example.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 07:05 PM
30

Why do you believe the counselor in question is giving a false account? (Especially since this is very much in keeping with other such gynocentric accounts from Australia).
/r/MensRights28/04/26 06:45 PM
61

It’s sad to see how incredibly misandrist Australia has become.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 05:28 PM
3

Gender based legislation such as VAWA and women only healthcare mandates under Obamacare. Organizations only giving aid to female victims such as food relief only being given to women in Haiti. Feminist propaganda such as the feminist Duluth Model which misrepresent the nature of male vs female victimization and perpetration make it harder for male victims to obtain help.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 02:44 PM
1

Feminists love to use misleading language that reflects poorly on men such as the patriarchy and toxic masculinity. If you enter an argument or discussion based on such manipulative terms without correcting the incorrect use you are supporting their idea that we live in a patriarchy or that masculinity is toxic. The idea that toxic masculinity is a good, well meaning term is B.S. for several reasons. For example If you mean well, you don’t make a negative connotation with something. Consider tha…
/r/MensRights28/04/26 02:16 PM
9

I didn’t say you weren’t a feminist. I accurately said feminism advantaging women over men, not equality. Again if all you are going to do is deny facts and state strawman fallacies, it’s pointless to discuss this with you.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 02:52 AM
12

If all you are going to do is deny the proven actions of feminism then there’s no point in having a discussion with you. Bye.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 02:37 AM
12

True. Advocating equality is egalitarianism. Feminist efforts to advantage one sex over the other contradict egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 02:25 AM
16

You are the one choosing an inaccurate definition that suits your agenda but doesn’t fit the reality if feminism. The Nazi party is by definition just a national social worker’s party. Does that accurately represent what the Nazi party actually did? Giving an organization a nice sounding definition doesn’t alter the reality of what that organization or movement actually does.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 02:23 AM
15

I didn’t say ALL feminists are that way. I said leading feminist organizations advocate discrimination against men. I presume you strawman me because you can’t address the actual facts of what I said.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 02:19 AM
21

Actual major feminist organizations have time and time again lobbied for and won laws that advantage women and disadvantage men. Obviously, that’s not equal. I’m not the one hiding behind an inaccurate definition. I’m the one pointing out what feminism actually does.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 12:41 AM
29

Actions speak louder than words. Feminism has proven time and time again that it’s not about gender equality.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 12:10 AM
30

Yeah, women have several reproductive rights, men have none, yet feminists complain it’s women that are getting the bad deal when it comes to reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 11:52 PM
77

Women have many ways to legally surrender parenthood, after conception has occurred. abortion being just one of them. They can also take the morning after pill or abortion pill. They can surrender a child after birth or give it up for adoption. These are for the most part opt out options unavailable to men. Men should of course have at least one means of legally surrendering parenthood. As it stands now, women have reproductive rights whereas men have reproductive responsibilities. There’s nothi…
/r/MensRights27/04/26 11:49 PM
3

He’s reacting to her, so yeah it’s reactive. The whole issue I have with this post is it’s placing the burden on men to not react to something a woman initiates. Isn’t the real issue that women shouldn’t be initiating the conflict in the first place? Also, why make this specific to women? Why should men respond differently to a woman initiating something than to a man doing the same?. If the goal is to deescalate conflict, shouldn’t this apply equally to men and women?
/r/MensRights27/04/26 11:25 PM
5

Reactive violence is in response to a violent act committed against one, in other words, it’s largely self defense and studies show women are much more likely than men to initiate domestic violence. It follows that the most effective way to stop reactive violence is to stop the initial acts of violence men are reacting to. If there’s no initial acts of violence there will be no reaction to it.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 08:39 PM
8

He promised free public transportation, more affordable housing and more affordable childcare, but all he’s done is raise taxes and raid funds, including the teacher’s fund (many teachers are female). The point however is that women more than men are claiming violence against him would be justified. It’s not that’s he’s been particularly harmful to women, but rather that women are more likely to condone violence against those they feel have wronged them.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 08:23 PM
1

Neither the right or left are great allies of men’s rights, but where the right has been fairly neutral, the rift has been actively harmful, mostly because it strongly supports feminism.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 08:14 PM
5

From what I’ve seen, your statement that for many the manosphere is anything feminists disagree with or don’t want heard is accurate. Many consider men’s rights part of the manosphere simply for accurately stating ways in which men are discriminated against. I think it comes down to the fact feminism wins policies advantaging women with their patriarchy theory arguments which claim men are privileged and oppress women. Any place that discusses the ways men are discriminated against works against…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 03:13 PM
11

We have many laws that advantage women over men, not the reverse. Men are victims of violent crime as much or more than women and risk being murdered at 4-5 times the rate of women. Your claims contradict the facts.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:55 PM
3

According to the survey, a woman was counted as a victim of violence if someone made a Pssst sound in her direction, if someone honked at them or leered at them among other things. (1) This is the tactic we see with the Koss survey and other surveys that have an agenda of showing high female victimization. Their “data” isn’t reported crime against women. Their data is biased survey information in which the surveyors count the most harmless experiences as sexual assault when the survey respondent…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 02:18 PM
2

Good for you!
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:08 PM
11

It’s hard to watch a movie or show these days that doesn’t have a gynocentric agenda. Men are routinely portrayed as bumbling idiots or villains while women are portrayed as virtuous and capable beyond their means. The History channel did a series on Vikings, portraying women as fierce warriors, despite a historian stating there’s no evidence women ever went off to fight, so add revisionist history to the TV gender agenda. I think these subtle biases may have more negative impact overall than bl…
/r/MensRights24/04/26 04:33 PM
12

Exactly. Not only is rape illegal with severe punishments, we have rape shield laws that give alleged rape victims more rights than those accused of other crimes. Under title IX mandates, college men accused of sexual assault are denied the most basic due process procedures. This is the opposite direction from normalizing and glorifying rape and sexual assault, at lest when it comes to female victims.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 02:44 PM
9

Sad to see so many people support such a hateful movement that promotes discrimination.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 01:06 PM
10

What’s the so called “manosphere advice” a reaction to? If marriage and divorce wasn’t so biased against men, if men didn’t get accused of harassment simply for asking women out, if men weren’t expected to marry down and be providers, then maybe the “manosphere” wouldn’t be warning men about the pitfalls of dating and marriage.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 08:44 PM
7

Men as a sex don’t pass laws. Politicians pass laws, sometimes in response to feminist lobbying efforts.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 04:22 AM
23

In the U.S., it’s illegal under the equal pay act to payment less for the same, equal work. The “pay gap” as measured by the Bureau of Labor Statistics is actually an earnings gap. It’s simply a comparison of men’s median income compared to women’s. Studies show it’s due to factors such as women working fewer hours per week, women taking time out of the work force and men choosing higher income potential jobs to support family. So, if we want to eliminate the earnings gap, we need to get women t…
/r/MensRights21/04/26 07:39 PM
1

Note, many who said yes, said only for a couple days…
/r/MensRights20/04/26 11:39 PM
6

Yeah, I’ll be the first to admit it’s a relatively low percent of men that get kicked out of college or get dragged through a title IX tribunal, but it’s common enough most know if someone who has been there and they don’t want to risk it happening to them. Getting expelled is not be as bad as spending decades in prison for something one didn’t do, but not being able to finish one’s education can have notable life long consequences.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 01:10 AM
15

College men approaching women risk being accused of harassment or as you said as being labeled creepy. Of course they are more hesitant to ask women out. Yes, women overall still want men to do the approach but a larger and larger percent will react very negatively to a man or at least the wrong man among them out. It’s like playing Russian roulette.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 10:19 PM
3

I used to participate in a gender studies forum where I argued with feminists regularly, often several times per day adding up to hundreds of discussions a year, and read many more. People reading a few posts here every day adds up to hundreds per year. Same thing. Heck, I probably argue with feminists in this sub over 100 times a year.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 02:32 PM
3

When the facts contradict one’s agenda, one must use logic fallacies. Some others often used: Apex and nadir fallacies. Examples: Men have power of rule, men are rapists. Revisionist history: claiming no women could vote prior to 1920, claiming women couldn’t bank prior to the 1970s, claiming women were the legal property of their husbands, etc. Similarly propagating disinformation such as over inflated rape rates or incorrectly claiming the gender wage gap compares equal work. Statements or arg…
/r/MensRights19/04/26 02:11 PM
14

The men’s movement doesn’t condone violence against women. Men and women are about equally victims of violent crime with men 4-5 times more likely to be murdered. So, you are absolutely wrong that men risk nothing. They risk more. Most of the laws that discriminate against men that the men’s movement wants to make equal are a direct result of feminist lobbying efforts. They are not a result of toxic masculinity. Masculinity can’t lobby for changes in the law. It appears to me you are not egalita…
/r/MensRights18/04/26 03:02 PM
3

Mostly a result of feminism.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:49 PM
16

Thanks for providing a real life example of misandry on the increase!
/r/MensRights18/04/26 04:28 AM
29

Someone posted a study here recently that an ever growing percentage of young women most notably dislike men, especially men who don’t embrace feminism (and it’s misandry).
/r/MensRights17/04/26 07:28 PM
1

I think No_Spite summed it up well. Discrimination or bias alone isn’t the basis for a lawsuit, one has to show a financial loss deserving of being compensated for. The fact Reddit is free and mostly anonymous means few have not suffered any actual financial loss due to any gender bias.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 03:52 PM
15

A quick read makes me think the study had the following bias: It shows men don’t want to do as much house chores and childcare as women, claiming the men are therefore sexist. The problem is they aren’t exploring the trade offs or the reverse. Are the women out working as much and bringing home an equal income? Are women equally willing to try to fix a plumbing problem? It appears to me that this study has the same problem that most house chores studied do: It ignores the fact that men and women…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 02:34 PM
24

It’s even more if a reality for men. “Overall, 44% of men and 37% of women have faced some form of online harassment.” (Though women get more worked up about it.) https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/07/14/men-women-experience-and-view-online-harassment-differently/
/r/MensRights17/04/26 12:04 AM
34

Anyone who uses drugs to rape women deserves to be sent away, but there’s a big difference between committing a crime, watching a video of a crime and watching the fictional portrayal/acting of a crime. Many millions of people watch action shows that fairly realistically depict murders. Does it mean millions of people are part of a murder academy? There are people who watch videos of cartel killings, wanting to see what these criminals are actually doing, it doesn’t mean the viewers wish to do t…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:48 PM
4

Generally not. Perhaps you confuse a just criticism of feminism with women.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:32 PM
3

A public forum open to anyone clearly isn’t going to have the same professionalism and content as a processional, juried journal, but one is free to ignore posts that are repetitive and focus on posts one finds more informative. I’ve become aware of many relevant laws and rulings here that I wouldn’t have seen otherwise. I’ve seen topics ranging from how WEEA impacts boys in education, to biases of the UN to new studies on how dating is changing. Most of the laws that discriminate against males …
/r/MensRights16/04/26 07:05 PM
7

From the about the community for this sub: “At the most basic level, men's rights are the legal rights that are granted to men. However, any issue that pertains to men's relationship to society is also a topic suitable for this subreddit. “ So, despite the term “rights” the topics don’t need to be limited to just legal rights.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 04:30 PM
7

By her same “logic” school funding should be significantly cut since there’s no parity there, a strong majority of teachers being female. Her argument makes no sense. A country funds a military because they need the protection a military offers, not because of the sex of the service members.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 04:14 PM
18

If I were a gay man I’d really hate the whole LGBT label: lumping these things all together as if they have common goals when often they have contradictory goals. Lesbians might be advocating women have certain advantages over men at work for example. Why would any man support this just because he’s gay?
/r/MensRights16/04/26 04:07 PM
7

There’s a difference between an echo chamber of facts and an echo chamber of disinformation.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 03:39 PM
5

Great post. Thank! Title IX sexual assault mandates is another example that comes to mind.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:45 PM
8

I respectfully disagree. Take for example the many links to women busted for falsely accusing men. They don’t show all women do this, what they do is refute the common feminist argument that women falsely accusing men is so rare as to be almost non existent. It’s a similar thing with posts about female teachers raping make students. They aren’t about showing women are bad, they are about showing that male victimization in these areas is in fact a real problem.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 01:25 PM
8

I know one leading men’s rights group has filed lawsuits claiming that if we are are to have selective service, it should equally apply to both men and women. Given the various roles in today’s military, I see no reason women shouldn’t be required to equally serve or equally register for potential service in the event a draft is ever required. That said, while I feel both women and men should be equally subject to selective service, I think the best solution is voluntary service, with pay and ot…
/r/MensRights15/04/26 12:33 AM
12

In the book, “The Fraud of Feminism” written back in 1913, the author noted lighter criminal sentencing for women was one if the first things feminism pushed for. Over 100 years later, feminists still push the idea women don’t have agency and are therefore not responsible for the crimes they commit as men are. If one thinks about it, the women don’t have agency argument could really backfire on feminists. If women don’t have agency and can’t control their actions the way men can, then why would …
/r/MensRights14/04/26 05:23 PM
41

Society is gynocentric. This includes hypergamy as well as biases related to marriage and divorce. Men need to beware it’s a rigged game in which they stand to loose much.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 01:50 PM
3

No, it’s not assuming men and women are the same. As I clearly said, there’s a difference between equal treatment and assuming people are the same (equal). A fire department can have an equal physical ability test for all candidates, specifically to identify the ways in which the candidates are not equal.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 02:03 AM
23

As Joey indicated, it’s not about addressing all victims of violent crime and it’s not about addressing those most likely to be victims of violent crime (men). It’s about singling out women for special consideration. Society is gynocentric after all.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 12:18 AM
9

Equal has meant “the same as” since I was in grade school at least. Two plus two equals four and two plus two is the same as four mean the same thing. I treat men and women equally is the same as I treat men and women the same. Treating men and women equally doesn’t mean Women and men are equal, it’s the treatment of them that is equal in that statement. What purposely muddies the water these days are terms like parity and equity which sound equal but in reality are often achieved by discriminat…
/r/MensRights14/04/26 12:13 AM
5

Genitalia is different but they doesn’t mean we need to define things according to genitalia or how it’s used. For example, many states define a rape victim as one who is penetrated without valid consent and a perpetrator as one who penetrates without valid consent. Obviously this is biased since makes penetrate and censors are penetrated in PIV sex. We could use non biased definitions (which some states do) which don’t rely on who has penetrating equipment and who is designed to be penetrated. …
/r/MensRights13/04/26 11:15 PM
3

I don’t think health leave should be specific to any issue. Employees should be free to use health leave / paid leave as they being depending on their own specific needs. Having to provide women with 32 more days of paid leave than men would be a great way to discourage employers from hiring women.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 07:35 PM
8

You claim to care about men’s rights, but all you have done here is justify policies of discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 02:37 PM
5

Affirmative action helps women by advantaging them in job hiring. The affordable care act mandated women only services but no men only services. It also required men to subsidize women’s healthcare. That’s not equal. WEEA provided funding to focus on girls in K-12 education, to the detriment of boys. Again, this isn’t equal.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 02:36 PM
15

Affirmative action for women, women owned business advantages, women’s healthcare advantages under Obamacare, WEEA are examples that feminists win. Another law advantaging women is if course selective service exemption.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 01:49 PM
19

What feminism says women want and what most women actually want can be opposing things.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 01:31 PM
57

There is no patriarchy for women to be smashing. Women aren’t excluded from having a say in politics. Our political system is gynocentric, having passed many laws advantaging women.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 01:30 PM
19

A bit more realistic than traditional feminists but anyone supporting feminism is still supporting an Anti-male movement.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 08:35 PM
5

I think it’s an example if hie it’s nearly impossible today to watch a movie that doesn’t have anti-make identity politics in it.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 03:27 PM
4

Many studies show women initiate more dined tic violence than men yet there remains a perception that men perpetuate must domestic violence, driven in part by the feminist Duluth Study. It shows how effective feminist propaganda is.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 02:14 PM
5

We need to stop treating people as if guilty based on accusations alone, with no finding of guilt. Depp lost movie roles, the innocent Duke players were kicked off their team, etc. MeToo is all about publicly accusing men with the hope the unproven accusations alone will cause them harm. People treating accused men as guilty is as much of the problem as the accusation. A practice that needs to stop. Where one lives, their job, etc matters. When I lived in a woke college environment, false accusa…
/r/MensRights11/04/26 01:55 PM
5

Again, if you are going to claim something occurring in a society makes it systemic, then the word really has no meaning.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 06:17 PM
2

Something occurring in a society doesn’t make it systemic. By your argument men bring murdered and women committing infanticide would also be systemic. Rape is a crime, with severe punishment. Men accused of this crime have less rights than those accused of other crimes under rape shield laws. That’s not what something systemic to a society looks like.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 06:09 PM
10

I agree, people act on incentive. More men are questioning entering a marriage that most likely won’t end well for them. You can bet 2/3 of divorced wouldn’t be initiated by women it was men instead of women that profited by divorce. Asking a woman out carries s higher risk of being accused of sexual assault, so it comes as no surprise to me fewer young men are asking women out than ever before. Hypergamous desires and biased family law most likely aren’t going away anytime soon, so men will lik…
/r/MensRights10/04/26 03:48 PM
7

As you said, it’s not equal. That’s my point. My friend’s experience is fairly common. Men provide for women, even after the partnership is dissolved, which is the OPs point. That’s actually the point of marriage: To get men to commit to providing for women and to pay a huge penalty if that contract ends. Marriage and divorce isn’t about equality. Hypergamy and gynocentrism assure it’s not.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 02:43 PM
10

Hypergamy dictates men rarely marry an equal, and as the OP pointed out, there’s nothing equal about one partner earning most of the income only to give at least half to the other. One of my friends retired early for this reason after separating from his wife. He figured why should he be working full time and giving up half his earnings to fund her comfortable, early retirement. Again, nothing equal about that.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 02:12 PM
10

Obviously it’s not systemic: a part of the system. To the contrary, such acts aren’t accepted and promoted but are illegal and subject to severe punishment if proven. Many countries have femicide and other such laws which make violence against women a greater crime than violence against men. Many, many countries are harsher in male criminals than female criminals.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 02:32 AM
2

Masculinity is simply the attributes of being male. Gynocentrism and misandry are something all together different.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 01:12 AM
29

If women were oppressed we wouldn’t have law after law advantaging women over men.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 08:03 PM
2

This is simply one video. We don’t know if it was set up, if it’s typical or atypical. To the degree it may be true, it highlights that boys and girls do develop a bit differently and that if we focus on teaching in a manner and time that’s best for girls, it probably won’t be best for boys. This is precisely one of the changes made in education under WEEA in the U.S. that started casing boys to fall behind.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 06:14 PM
5

I think most people here are aware we passed legislation to focus on girls to the detriment of boys. A couple other even less discussed great points she brings up here; Feminists groups like the AAUW not only pushed to advantage girls in education but actively tried to cover up how boys were falling behind, claiming this was just made up. I like that she points out, this isn’t just harmful to boys and men, but had tremendous potential negative societal implications in the long run. Men work more…
/r/MensRights08/04/26 05:04 PM
17

I second this!
/r/MensRights08/04/26 04:48 PM
3

I presume you your strawman is because you can’t address the actual point made.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 03:34 PM
12

In essence this all comes to the fact society is gynocentric. Politicians pander to women, people care more about women’s issues, etc.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 08:46 PM
50

1, We don’t live in a patriarchy, so his argument falls apart right there. This is the same thinking as “no blacks allowed” that occurred in some southern areas after WW2.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 03:15 PM
12

That’s something I point out all the time. When the U.S. was founded only 6% of the population could vote, some of those were women. So while there were more eligible men voters, the fact is the vast majority of both men and women couldn’t vote. It’s not this all men could vote and no women couldn’t feminists claim.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 02:31 PM
4

Most don’t want to know the discrimination and misandry feminism has spread do they just accept the rhetoric that it’s about equality because that’s what makes them feel good about supporting it.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 11:41 AM
111

I see a similar thing when I point out policies that advantage women over men to feminists. Often they’ll try to deny such policies exist even though they are documented law. Then they’ll claim advantaging women over men isn’t discriminatory. As you said, the mental gymnastics are insane.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 04:30 AM
2

Feminism has proven time and time again that it’s not about equality.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 12:21 AM
6

I read his article about Jury nullification. His point was that under rape shield laws, evidence may be withheld from being presented. He stated that if jurors feel evidence is being withheld, they have a right to nullify, but juries are rarely told they have this right. His point wasn’t that clear rapists should be sent free, his point was that juries don’t need to vote guilty if they believe crucial evidence was withheld. His article was in my opinion poorly written opening him to criticism, b…
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:19 PM
6

Many publications will withhold the name if an accusing woman but publish the name of an accused woman. Why should the one making the accusation deserve anonymity? Clearly they are just assuming the man is guilty. It’s do biased.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 03:01 PM
5

I don’t typically make my own definitions and it’s not about definitions, it’s about what feminism does.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 04:26 AM
4

Thousands of people on an aircraft carrier. How many of these roles can only men do? We even have women flying jets these days… You’d have a point if being in the military meant you had to engage in hand to hand combat, but that’s today’s military.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 07:20 PM
1

I assume you lie because the one sided nature of it’s enforced doesn’t suit your agenda. Under title IX, colleges can’t discriminate in the basis of sex period. It’s not limited to sports. Title IX states “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. It doesn’t just apply to sports. Not only is this crystal c…
/r/MensRights04/04/26 03:29 PM
1

They’re not collegiate sports. Title IX applies to everything a college does, not just sports.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 02:52 PM
18

Almost every pro-lifer I know believes a fetus is a person so aborting it U.S. murder in their eyes. I know several women who have this stance. I’ve never met anyone who is pro-life as an anti-feminist stance. I’m very anti-feminist but I don’t think abortion should be universally illegal.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 02:34 PM
1

The Duke case and college environment that treated the players unfairly is an example that biased college systems started long before Obama’s “Dear Colleagues Letter”. Many colleges had jumped on the woke bandwagon and were treating accused men unfairly. Obama simply endured all colleges would do so. It’s not just Duke that’s to blame. There was a lot of momentum in this direction from many colleges and universities.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 05:45 PM
3

That’s not at all what he said. Bad strawman on your part.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 05:37 PM
9

I heard a recording of a male victim of domestic violence calling a domestic violence hotline and being told, that’s the police came, he’s be the one arrested. If a college man reports a woman assaulting him, she’s likely to counter with a false claim against him and she’s likely to be believed. The reason men don’t report crimes committed against them by women is often because it’s more likely to get the man in trouble than the female perpetrator. That’s a problem of system bias. That of course…
/r/MensRights03/04/26 03:36 PM
9

Society has a system of holding people who do bad things accountable if it can be proven they did the bad things they are accused of. That’s not the problem. The problem is blaming other people who did nothing wrong just because they happen to be the same sex. Women shoplift far more than men, women commit infanticide more than men, women initiate domestic violence more than men, yet we generally don’t blame all women for these actions, the way men as a sex are blamed for the actions of a few.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 03:26 PM
11

True, but that’s the apex and nadir fallacies in action, which relates to the problem with identity politics in general. People having a common demographic characteristic with someone who did something bad doesn’t mean they share responsibility in that bad person’s actions. Blaming all men for a few bad encounters with other men is like blaming all people with brown hair for the actions of Hitler. Sure, a few men behaving badly is a factor in misandry, but making that association is the nadir fa…
/r/MensRights03/04/26 03:19 PM
7

I used to participate in one of those and the bias was huge. Giving correct information got me banned much as it did in feminist subs. That said, I encourage others here to participate in such subs even if it means eventually getting banned. This is a great sub, but we are preaching to the choir here. We need to challenge gynocentric attitudes elsewhere.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 08:32 PM
6

Sadly, it isn’t just a random woman who has this view. When I worked in higher education, they had mandatory student “training” pushing this narrative, the message being most men will rape women if they have a chance and the only way a man can partially redeem himself is to intervene to prevent a rape. However, even then as a man he’s still to blame for women being sexually assaulted. Of course actual sexual assault reporting indicates sexual assaults occurring at a reported rate of about 6 per …
/r/MensRights02/04/26 08:21 PM
1

This post has nothing to do with men’s rights. It’s simply using the nadir logic fallacy to bash men.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 04:13 PM
1

Yes, liberals tend to support the female privileges I mentioned and conservatives are more likely to oppose them. Obama and Biden pushed title IX biases against college men, Trump partially rolled them back. Biden as senator was a big backer of VAWA. WEEA was pushed by democrats, same with women only healthcare benefits under Obamacare. I’m not claiming republicans are huge champions of equal rights for men but they have clearly been better than democrats in that regard.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 09:47 PM
2

Well said. It’s denying people jobs and other opportunities based on their sex that’s the real problem. We have some laws that that make some specific forms of discrimination illegal such as the 19th amendment, the equal pay act and civil rights act, but sadly we have other laws that support discrimination such as women owned business advantages, affirmative action for women and WEEA.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 05:54 PM
4

Getting an abortion, the abortion pill, the morning after pill, surrendering a child, putting a child up for adoption: These are choices women have to avoid legal parenthood. Men generally have no say in any of these. If you don’t want a woman to trick you into parenthood, get a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 05:28 PM
13

Men earn work more and earn more, work less but spend more. We have many laws advantaging women over men. Politicians pander to the women’s vote. Men die sooner and face more injuries. Our criminal justice system goes easier on women. Only men are subject to selective service. Family law favors women. This describes a man’s world?
/r/MensRights01/04/26 04:34 AM
8

Yeah, it does. Feminist “equality” has nothing to do with equal treatment or equal non discrimination.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 01:41 AM
12

Funny how it’s a title IX problem if slightly more men than women proportionally choose to go out for sports, but there’s no title IX issue when programs like aerobics, palates and yoga are incredibly female dominated.
/r/MensRights31/03/26 09:11 PM
17

Men work more and earn more but studies show, women spend more. In otherwise men work more to subsidize women who work less, but feminists spin this as a negative for women.
/r/MensRights30/03/26 10:20 PM
34

Looks like feminists need to figure out how to convince women to work as much and as hard as men.
/r/MensRights30/03/26 10:11 PM
5

If I’m discussing gender issues with someone and they start using logic fallacies, they are almost always feminist. Facts typically don’t support feminist arguments so logic fallacies are needed. What fallacy depends in the context. I find Ad Hominem’s, Strawmans, non sequitors, apex/nadir fallacies and arguments based on a false premise to all be very common.
/r/MensRights29/03/26 05:50 PM
7

The Violence Against Women Act is that way. There, they cleaned out most of the gender specific pronouns to make it sound more gender neutral but its title still says it all, it still says in the text it’s about women, and still pushes resources to women.
/r/MensRights29/03/26 12:30 AM
11

No, they advantage women. We do have non discrimination legislation like the equal pay act, the 19th amendment and civil rights act that prohibit discrimination, but the above acts don’t prohibit discrimination, they encourage it. Again, what policies has the MRM won that advantage men?
/r/MensRights28/03/26 12:59 AM
17

And to take it even a step further someone in the KKK could claim they don’t support discrimination against black people despite joining an anti-black organization. That’s the same as a woman joining an anti-male organization but saying she doesn’t support discrimination against men. Regardless of what each says, or even believes they are in fact supporting an organization that supports discrimination.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 12:24 AM
12

Affirmative action for women. Women’s educational equity act Women owned business advantages Women only healthcare mandates under Obamacare. VAWA Title IX sexual assault mandates The Women's Entrepreneurship and Economic Empowerment (WEEE) Act (Public Law 115-428), So, now you name laws advantaging men the MRM has won.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 12:06 AM
15

I can name several policies feminists have won advantaging women. These are not “catching up” they are advantages . Name any policies the MRM has advocated for that similarly advantage men. Go on, name them.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 11:52 PM
15

It’s not that some feminists spread hate about men, it’s that the major feminist organizations actively fight to advantage women and disadvantage men and to this end spread misandrist propaganda. The men’s movement in contrast isn’t fighting to advantage men, it’s fighting for equal rights. In other words the men’s movement is trying to reduce or end discrimination while feminism is fighting for discrimination. It’s a very big difference between the two movements.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 11:26 PM
14

You highlight a very important distinction: In choosing to join a movement one is supporting what that movement is about. If one chooses to become a feminist, they are participating in the agenda of feminism and share the responsibility of what feminism does. In contrast, a demographic attribute such as being male isn’t a choice and doesn’t mean one supports anything and doesn’t make one responsible for others having the same demographic attribute. This is the basic flawed logic of patriarchy th…
/r/MensRights27/03/26 08:18 PM
88

Certainly not all feminists are the same, but being a feminist is a choice just like joining the KKK is a choice. Those who choose to be feminist are making the choice to back an anti-male movement regardless of how “radical” they are or aren’t. This is a place where many feminists hide behind the no true Scotsman fallacy.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 07:43 PM
10

A big problem with patriarchy theory as with identity politics in general as it blames all people of a certain demographic regardless of their individual actions. Blaming all men for the actions of a minority is like blaming all brown haired people for the actions of Hitler. Being a man doesn’t make me responsible for the actions of a minority of men and as a man I have no more sway in what government does than a woman has. We don’t live in a patriarchy, so any argument based on patriarchy theor…
/r/MensRights27/03/26 04:41 PM
13

Murderers murder men. The sex of the murderer doesn’t make the victim any less dead.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 04:35 PM
2

People often focus on the person making a false accusation and certainly such false accusations are terrible, but I think what often gets lost is that it’s how police, prosecutors, schools, businesses, etc react to false allegations that causes the harm. The Harm caused Depp when Heard falsely accused him was that Disney withdrew his film offers. The whole point of MeToo is that men will suffer due to unproven allegations. The reason women like Crystal Mangum make false allegations is because th…
/r/MensRights27/03/26 04:33 PM
4

Misogyny isn’t institutional. Companies and education cater to females. Media portrays men as either evil or idiots. Women spend more than men so advertising caters to women. Politicians pander to the women’s vote and to that end have passed several laws legally advantaging women over men.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 04:10 PM
13

Yes, men perpetrate more violent crime than women, but the post is about the risk of being victimized not about the sex of the perpetrator. In the U.S., men are victims of violent crime more than women and 4-5 times more likely to be murdered. Women don’t face more risk. They face less risk. Male perpetrators are more likely to kill other men than kill women, but that’s really irrelevant to the issue. Someone who is murdered is dead regardless of the sex of the perpetrator. The graphic posted by…
/r/MensRights27/03/26 04:04 PM
12

This is exactly it. Perceptions, fears and concerns often don’t align with actual statistical risk. Just because women may fear more for their safety doesn’t mean they face more risk. Similarly, the fact society and organizations like the UN focus more on women’s safety isn’t driven by actual risk but rather is driven by gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 03:53 PM
21

You are right. One sex being subject to something more doesn’t mean the other sex should be ignored in that area. It’s like saying since men are murdered more, women being murdered doesn’t matter. If we are going to talk about victimization, men are overall victims of violent crime slightly more than women in the U.S., but men are much, much more likely to be victimized by the worst violent crime: murder. So why focus on female victimization? I believe gender shouldn’t be an issue. Victims shoul…
/r/MensRights27/03/26 12:19 AM
15

I’ve always focused more on the agenda of trying to get men to marry down and support women as a means to dime their supposed loneliness problem, but you offer another great angle in this. It most certainly supports the agenda that men more incapable, this perception going way, way beyond loneliness and relationships.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 12:10 AM
5

Can you give an example of women’s loneliness being overblown for gender politics agenda?
/r/MensRights27/03/26 12:03 AM
11

I like your analogy. To use economic terms it’s a cost-benefit analysis. Even if marriage reduces loneliness (big if) , it doesn’t mean the cost is worth it, especially in the long run. A marriage that eases loneliness today might create more loneliness down the line, and may cost a man a great deal.
/r/MensRights26/03/26 11:22 PM
15

Well said. The presumption is men should feel honored to take care of women. Men are beginning to question such presumptions.
/r/MensRights26/03/26 11:17 PM
18

Paternity fraud is fraud. Just as we collect basic information to reduce other kinds of fraud, we should do so with paternity fraud. Paternity testing isn’t just about paternity fraud. Having correct lineage also helps in diagnosing and treating hereditary diseases. I’ve read some very sad stories about children suffering needlessly because false assumptions of who’s the parent hundred proper diagnosis.
/r/MensRights26/03/26 11:16 PM
41

Yes and not just feminists. I’m reminds me of that psychology article that was popular here a few years ago that assumed all single men must be lonely and recommend that men should lower their standards even more and support women even more as a means to solve their loneliness. Being unmarried of course doesn’t mean a man is lonely. In fact being single can provide the freedom to pursue a social life. Many of the loneliest men I’ve known were stuck in unhappy marriages. Many single men are singl…
/r/MensRights26/03/26 10:49 PM
1

You realize that by repeatedly and strongly justifying discrimination against men you are actually supporting my point. That’s exactly what feminism does.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 10:53 PM
2

I’m not assuming anything. The existence of feminist organizations and the policies they’ve won are documented fact. In her book “Who Stole Feminism”. Hoff Somners documents how feminists used conferences to strategize and execute practices to further their cause. Very few movements have won as many advantageous policies as feminism has. They didn’t win all these advantageous policies by being disorganized.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 01:22 PM
1

I used to think the same, but read the anti-male sentiments in the declaration of sentiments, read “The Fraud of Feminism” published in 1913, you will see that feminism been anti-male for a long time. That said, I agree that it wasn’t until the 1960s and 70s that feminism had the funding, political clout and organization to really gain notable policies of discrimination against males.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 01:14 PM
1

Except men are specifically targeted. Feminist lobbying efforts to discriminate against men in job hiring, in business ownership, in healthcare, in education and more aren’t collateral damage, they are the result of purposeful efforts to advantage women and disadvantage men. It’s the same with feminist disinformation about men victimizing women. It’s purposefully misandry, not some dude consequence.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 01:08 PM
1

We passed laws that ban discrimination which are aimed at protecting women but protect both secrs from discrimination such as the 19th amendment and equal pay act. Those laws are great. What you ignore however is we also have laws that specifically discriminate against males. Discriminating against men doesn’t decrease discrimination, it creates more discrimination. Affirmative action for women, women owned business advantages, WEEA, women only healthcare mandates, etc., don’t reduce discriminat…
/r/MensRights25/03/26 01:02 PM
5

A movement doesn’t need a pope to be organized in organizations.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 11:17 AM
7

Of course it’s organized. There are major feminist organizations, feminist conferences, etc.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 10:31 AM
3

Except feminist organizations have continually fought for and won policies that disadvantage males. Advantaging one sex over the other obviously isn’t equality. One doesn’t undo discrimination by creating more discrimination. One addresses discrimination by not discriminating. Creating more discrimination against men isn’t reverse discrimination or positive discrimination as it’s commonly called, it’s just discrimination.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 10:19 AM
2

Feminism seeks to advantage females and disadvantage males. “The Fraud of Feminism” written in 1913 documents how feminism even then had been pushing to advantage women, advocating lighter criminal sentencing for example. In the U.S., the declaration of sentiments has sure very anti-make undertones. Since the 60s, feminist organizations have been winning legislation favoring females in job hiring, in education, in business ownership, in healthcare, in how domestic violence is handled and more. T…
/r/MensRights25/03/26 10:14 AM
7

Yeah, obviously men have children too, but feminists seem to ignore that. Regardless, we can’t exempt people from the repercussions of their crimes simply because they have children. It’s a ridiculous argument. Their agency argument is also very problematic. If women can’t control their actions the way men can, then why would anyone give women responsibility?
/r/MensRights25/03/26 02:31 AM
5

This reminds me of an earlier post today where a male student was screwed over because he couldn’t produce an alabi. We are supposed to have a presumption of innocence with the burden on the accuser to prove their accusation, but in reality that’s changing. Accused men are often presumed guilty until they can prove their innocence and often even then the harm caused them due to false accusations is irreversible.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 01:42 AM
21

Even the BLS, the ones that measure and report the earnings gap, clearly say it compares men’s median vs women’s median wages and does NOT compare equal work.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 12:19 AM
17

“The Fraud of Feminism” written in 1913, points out that lighter criminal sentencing was one of the first things the feminist movement pushed for. You can find a free copy of the book online. (And it’s on Amazon) In the U.K. , judges were specifically told to go easier on women criminals. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/7995844/Judges-told-be-more-lenient-to-women-criminals.html Feminist scholars in the U.S. have argued women should never be sent to prison based on the wome…
/r/MensRights25/03/26 12:16 AM
12

I think men’s groups realize feminism and women aren’t the same thing. They realize much of the discrimination men face is a result of politicians pandering to feminist lobbying efforts, Christ having nothing to do with it. The men’s movement has to fight a very entrenched, powerful, well funded feminist movement as well as gynocentric attitudes, not an easy task. What I think they could do better is focus on a few issues that aren’t too controversial are winnable and will make an impact. An exa…
/r/MensRights24/03/26 08:22 PM
29

Yes, it includes self harm, but the large number of “affected women” is that they include any thought of suicide or self harm. Having a simple thought about suicide or self harm doesn’t mean one is contemplating suicide.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 04:38 PM
213

As actual, relevant suicide data doesn’t suit their gynocentric agenda so instead they designed a biased study that focuses on rare thoughts of suicide, which of course don’t have the impact actual suicide does. How disingenuous of them to conflate an occasional thought of suicide with actual suicide. Note that having a thought about suicide isn’t even the same as contemplating suicide.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 04:12 PM
11

From what I saw, he gave feel good comments with no actual examples of how he’d fight discrimination against men. Would he fight to stop biased title IX procedures and women only scholarships in Texas campuses? Would he oppose DEI? As we see with Mamdani, words are cheap. We need to hear an actual, specific plan to reduce discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 03:40 AM
0

You need to read the laws regarding what constitutes rape for the jurisdiction in question.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 03:27 AM
3

Sounds reasonable to me but will never happen.
/r/MensRights23/03/26 02:21 PM
6

Overlooking men is the point if such programs.
/r/MensRights23/03/26 01:26 PM
3

Actually we have many laws that entitle women to special advantages. We also have many biased practices which essentially entitle women to lighter prison sentences, child custody, better divorce settlements, etc.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 04:03 PM
20

Affirmative action for women disadvantages men in job hiring. The Women’s Educational Equity Act is what started setting boys back in education. Women owned business advantages disadvantage male owned businesses. The violence against women act hurts male victims of domestic violence. Title IX mandates deny college men accused of sexual assault the most basic due processes procedures. These and more are a direct result of feminist lobbying efforts to advantage females and disadvantage males. We c…
/r/MensRights19/03/26 09:59 PM
17

U.S.: Affirmative action for women. Women’s educational equity act Women owned business advantages. VAWA Selective service exemption. Women only health benefits under Obamacare. Insurance companies can charge young men higher auto insurance premiums but under Obamacare can’t charge women due to higher health insurance premiums to reflect their higher claim rates there. Title IX sexual assault mandates. The Women's Entrepreneurship and Economic Empowerment (WEEE) Act of 2018 (signed 2019) Some st…
/r/MensRights19/03/26 09:10 PM
25

It’s not just biology. Biased marriage and divorce laws and legal advantages empower women. If women didn’t get men’s money in divorce, if women weren’t favored in child custody, if females weren’t artificially advantaged in education and job hiring, if prostitution was legal, women’s power would be very different.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 02:10 PM
3

Feminists organizations have time and time again lobbied for policies that advantage women and disadvantage men, clearly showing they are not about gender equality.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 01:08 PM
1

“The War Against Boys” outlines how feminists won the women’s educational equity act which encouraged K-12 education to focus on girls to the detriment of boys. Then we have feminist sponsored “no boys allowed” college prep programs, women only scholarships, Title IX mandates that are biased against men, women are advantaged 2:1 in college STEMS. Given all the advantages to females and make disadvantages in education, the real question is: Why is anyone surprised fewer men are going to college?
/r/MensRights18/03/26 02:37 AM
6

Exactly. The base problem is Critical Theory / Cultural Marxism identity politics which paints people as oppressors or oppressed based on their demographic characteristics, regardless of their actual situation. Intersectionality is simply one aspect of that basic theory. It’s the baseline identity politics that’s the real issue, not the additive implication of intersectionality.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 03:28 PM
4

The UN highly rates “equality” by discrimination.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 03:27 AM
25

Most women want to be provided for. Marriage is a long play, sugaring is the short play. Their mind set is that if they are going to have sex with men, they might as well monetize it. The other more obvious things the article leaves out is one’s financial situation which of course could also relate to their mental health. Of course also relevant is whether a young woman has what it takes to attract a sugar daddy willing to pay. The article is clearly omitting obvious factors to paint a victim me…
/r/MensRights14/03/26 03:06 PM
9

That’s precisely what gets misrepresented: When the U.S. gained its independence, the vast majority of men were not eligible to vote and actually a small minority of women were. Over time, voting rights expanded. It’s fair to say more men were eligible to vote during this time than women but the idea all men could vote in early America while no women could is simply false. It’s much like the apex fallacy argument feminists love to use. To this day there is no constitutional right to vote and dif…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 04:16 PM
33

Feminists love their revisionist history and logic fallacies. When the U.S. was founded only 6% of the population could vote, some of those in fact being women. So, the vast majority of both men and women couldn’t vote. Several states passed their own non discrimination voting rights laws before the 19th amendment was passed. So, again this idea all men could vote but no women could prior to the 19th amendment is simply false. Other false feminist claims include the idea wives were the legal pro…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 01:11 PM
22

Echoing a previous answer: we don’t live in a patriarchy so anything based on that premise is an argument based on a false premise. Call out the false premise and don’t engage beyond that.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 03:27 AM
16

In other words the problem is that we refer to female privilege as equal rights for women, when of course privileging women isn’t equal.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 11:44 PM
48

The article is a great example of biased framing. The real issue isn’t equality going far enough. The problem is discrimination against men going too far. Equality isn’t the problem, it’s discrimination that’s the problem.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 09:05 PM
20

You can support men’s rights efforts to change the biases that exist. You can make choices so as to reduce the biases you personally experience. For example. I look at the biases of marriage and divorce and choose not to marry. I chose to move away from a woke environment that encourages discrimination to an area that’s much more about egalitarianism and meritocracy.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 09:01 PM
24

What I like about this article is it demonstrates that it’s not just the false accuser causing the problem it’s how the false accusation is handled. The problem here was a corrupt, DA and a university that treated the boys as guilty without any proof of guilt The problem with title ix cases isn’t just the false accusation. It’s that the accused men are denied to process. The problem Depp ran into wasn’t just Amber heard’s false allegation, but that Disney and other movie companies were dropping …
/r/MensRights12/03/26 08:47 PM
4

“Almost a third of generation Z men and boys think a wife should obey her husband” In other words, a notable majority do not believe that.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 03:58 PM
5

That’s essentially what MeToo was about: Tarnishing a man’s reputation without proof of wrongdoing in the hope such unproven accusations would negatively impact him.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 03:13 PM
5

Sad to see how misandrist Australia has become.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 01:30 PM
1

California is where it’s being challenged under California non discrimination law. We could possibly see similar lawsuits in other states.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 02:50 PM
18

Men are typically victims of violent crime more so than women and far more likely to be murdered so while women may fear more for their personal safety, and while society may care more about women’s safety, those concerns are not inline with actual risk. In terms of funding, I saw the exact opposite: Due to Title IX concerns the women’s softball team received the same budget as the men’s baseball team despite having fewer players. Having more money per athlete meant they could stay in nicer acco…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 03:27 PM
60

I used to work in higher education. The coaches simply couldn’t recruit as many female athletes. Men and women overall simply have different interests. If slightly more men than women go into athletics, everyone screams discrimination but those same people don’t mind aerobics, palates, yoga, etc being incredibly female dominated. It’s the same with college majors. People get all upset if more men go into biology, but psychology, sociology, art, etc. being female dominated is fine. If a program h…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 03:02 PM
428

So if a restaurant or bar acts in this then when the women’s restroom is busy, women can use the men’s, but if the men’s is busy, men can’t use the women’s. Women will be afforded gender based privacy, but men will not. There’s clearly nothing equal about that.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:36 PM
19

This is even more discriminatory than making black people sit in the back of the bus. It seems we can never get past justifying discrimination. They were at least allowed whereas here men are blatantly being denied service and jobs because of their sex. This practice clearly violates California’s non discrimination laws. It will be interesting to see how the lawsuit goes.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 09:23 AM
40

Because society is hypergamous and gynocentric. Men expected to marry and support women.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 09:13 AM
21

In the U.S., the Women’s Educational Equity Act (WEEA) including the WEEA Center was passed in the 1970s which have the WEEA center the authority and funding to shape K-12 education to focus on girls (to the detriment of boys). * We also saw the introduction of no boys allowed college prep programming. We also saw biased title IX rulings favoring females as well as many female only scholarships. It was shown that education favored females in STEMS 2:1. In short, boys fell behind because there wa…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 09:10 AM
9

Most of the laws that discrimination against men came about due to feminist lobbying efforts. One can’t address the problem without recognizing the cause. As “The Fraud of Feminism” pointed out in the early 1900s, feminism sought advantages for females even then. That’s a stark contrast to the men’s movement which genuinely seeks equality.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 04:30 AM
1

No, I don’t think the fact women get pregnant and men don’t means male rape victims should be taken less seriously and that male perpetrators deserve harsher sentences. I don’t think that follows at all.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 04:08 AM
11

Using one’s own country which is a very recognized country as an example isn’t USdefaultism. Note, I clearly said “for example”. I didn’t claim every country passed the same voting laws at the same time. I understand English may not be your first language so you may not have understood the “for example” that any fluent English speaker would have clearly understood.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 04:10 PM
10

Landman: A young, inexperienced female lawyer is portrayed as knowing more about the law than a team of experienced male layers. A man is manipulated into taking his ex wife back who controls him and spends his money like there’s no tomorrow. The son is a total simp to the woman he wants to date. All the men living in the house bow to Angela’s ridiculous rules and wishes.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 03:13 PM
49

An important point many miss. At no point have men received a constitutionally guaranteed right to vote in the U.S. The 19th amendment as signed simply says: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.” The Amendment doesn’t actually give either men or women a right to vote.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 02:55 PM
42

“What year women got the right to vote” is often misleading. Passing a law making it illegal to discriminate on the basis of sex doesn’t mean no women were ever allowed to vote prior to that time. For example, people often say women couldn’t vote in the U.S. prior to 1920 when the 19th amendment was passed when in reality there were women who were eligible to vote when the US won it’s independence and there were women who voted even in colonial America. Note however that the vast majority of bot…
/r/MensRights08/03/26 02:48 PM
3

That’s the thing. They start with an emotional argument, then use disinformation supporting their argument and ignore facts that prove their argument wrong.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 03:18 PM
1

I strongly second this. What is pushed in education will infiltrate the rest of society.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 01:06 AM
2

No, I mean Obama. The title IX sexual assault handling mandates that deny due process were mandated by Obama not Nixon.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 09:33 PM
11

As a gay man you may lose a job to to a less experienced female candidate under affirmative action, might lose a job contract due to women owned business advantages, could get screwed over in a title IX hearing, are lacking the healthcare advantages provided to women. As a gay man you should oppose those who most strongly promote discrimination against men. You are a man after all.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 05:52 PM
24

The Duke case should have made it clear how important due process and a presumption of guilt are, but to the contrary, Title IX executive orders by the Obama and Biden administration administrations mandate accused men be denied the most basic due process procedures. As well as mandate any hint of a possible violation be aggressively pursued by colleges. This goes beyond just men’s rights. Due process is a cornerstone of civilized societies. Once society starts throwing out due process and a pre…
/r/MensRights05/03/26 03:27 PM
2

Yes, but the discriminatory changes made under that legislation are still in place. It hasn’t been reversed.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 03:19 PM
6

My point is, that should be the end of the conversation. Don’t engage a feminist point based on a false premise. We need to discredit their disinformation, not give it more credit by accepting it as true for the sake of argument.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 03:15 PM
11

The patriarchy can’t hurt men too because we don’t live in a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 02:21 PM
7

Men are legally disadvantaged under affirmative action for men, under WEEA, under women owned businesses advantages, under selective service registration to give a few examples.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 03:29 AM
2

Feminists love revisionist history. For example when the U.S. won its independence, most only 6% of the population was eligible to vote, some of which were in fact women. In other words the vast majority of both men and women were excluded from voting. It wasn’t that all men could and most women couldn’t. Similarly women weren’t excluded from working, from running businesses. Etc. they weren’t considered men’s property. Some of the biggest opponents to suffrage were women who thought guaranteed …
/r/MensRights04/03/26 03:04 PM
12

Fight woke with woke I say. If they want to exempt it allow men that identify as female, by all means identify as female for that benefit. Consider, this is only an issue because we privilege women in so many areas.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 02:52 PM
32

How much you care about men’s issues and solving them are two very different things. Discrimination against men doesn’t go away because you or anyone else stops caring about it. One’s mental health or caring isn’t the bottleneck, the bottleneck is the actual discrimination.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 09:13 PM
19

Many state codes and college policies define a rape victim as one whom is penetrated without valid consent and a rapist as one who penetrates without valid consent. By that definition, in heterosexual sex, the man is the perpetrator since he’s the penetrator and the woman the victim since she was penetrated, even if both equally consented under the same state of intoxication. In some states such as Georgia, the law specifically states that rape is a crime committed by men against women. It’s a m…
/r/MensRights02/03/26 06:55 PM
6

I definitely experienced that in my last job. Men, especially single men were most expected to work off hours. I’ve definitely seen that it’s mostly women administrators pushing DEI, including replacing men with women in top positions. It’s incredible female top heavy now which is causing all sorts of problems.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 03:29 PM
14

Feminism has pushed for and won many policies that advantage women and disadvantage men. Anyone who claims it is about equality is either incredibly naive or disingenuous.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 02:39 PM
1

A husband trusts his wife will take as much as possible in a divorce. A prenuptial is based in this trust.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 02:27 PM
60

Sad to see that societies still blatantly discriminate against certain demographics of their population and are even proud of it.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 03:26 PM
5

I could only read the first couple paragraphs. My thought based on that though is the person didn’t really live both sexes. A man getting artificial breasts isn’t then same as a woman who has always had natural breasts. He can’t really say from experience how women feel about having natural breasts.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 04:34 AM
13

Exactly.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 08:43 PM
98

I’m really getting tired of the argument that going after false accusers somehow harms real victims. That’s like saying prosecuting shop lifters harms all shoppers. Discouraging and reducing false accusers gives more credibility to real victims and frees up more resources for investigation and adjudication of real offenses.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 08:16 PM
4

Yeah, and I point I’ll add is that paternity testing isn’t just about catching paternity fraud. Assuming an incorrect paternity can make it harder to diagnose and treat genetic diseases.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 07:30 PM
14

All states adopt equal presumption of joint custody laws. Child support needs to be more reasonable and not be used as alimony as it often is. Fathers shouldn’t be expected to pay the brunt of child costs and all the support should be for the child, not the mother. A system where the mother just gets a check is prone to abuse. Reduce alimony and stop viewing money that’s been earned by one person and is under their name as being communal. I get that a wife who has been out of the workforce deser…
/r/MensRights27/02/26 04:43 PM
1

Some men’s issues are directly related to matters of public policy, others not so much. Legally disadvantaging males in education, legally advantaging women owned businesses, legally advantaging women over men in job hiring, focusing on female victimization under VAWA are very much public policy issues. They could be largely fixed simply by reversing the discriminatory laws causing the problems. That’s less true of suicide. That’s not to say it’s not an important issue, it’s just not driven by d…
/r/MensRights27/02/26 02:40 PM
1

The MRM is obviously about equal rights for men not advantages. I argue however, this inherently opposes feminist policies and practices of advantaging women and disadvantaging men and similarly includes opposing feminist disinformation. I agree with the “academics” that the men’s movement (along with any egalitarian goal) is inherently anti-feminist. The issue is the academics misrepresent feminism as being pro-equality and therefore misrepresent any anti-feminism as opposing gender equality wh…
/r/MensRights27/02/26 02:10 PM
1

Holding boys back.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 01:02 AM
5

Men of course are disadvantaged and face many problems feminists simply won’t acknowledge, which the article outlines. What I find most interesting however that is often overlooked is your first point about women and spending. Feminists love to point out that nrn work more and earn more (gender pay gap), yet despite working less and earning less, women spend more. It’s a neat trick. In other words men work and earn more to subsidize women who work less so they can spend more. This is obviously a…
/r/MensRights26/02/26 02:50 AM
43

I find it’s mostly women, largely white who once were attractive and could easily get attention but not so much now so feel “invisible”. Of course they’re not invisible, they’re just nothing special, much as men have always experienced.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 02:05 AM
1

I’ve made my point a few times now.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 10:16 PM
2

No, not really like that. My point has nothing to do with a sudden injury or one’s own kids vs someone else’s. Imagine a nasty feminist like Dworkin. It’s easy, even comforting for her to claim she wants nothing to do with men when of course the reality is men want nothing to do with her. Similarly it’s easy for a young, single feminist woman to claim she doesn’t want a man’s support when no support is being offered but it’s quite different if a husband is actually offering such support.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 06:51 PM
2

I’ve seen many independent feminist women change their tune when they got married and started having kids, happy to be provided for at that time. I don’t think that’s a function of their hormones changing, I think it’s a result of being hit by reality. It’s easy to say you don’t want to be supported when being supported isn’t an option. It’s quite another thing to deny that support when it’s really on the table.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 06:05 PM
13

Well said. I’d much rather meet women organically through things I enjoy than under pressure at some manufactured dating event (which are typically structured with women in mind).
/r/MensRights25/02/26 04:29 PM
38

Attending a dating event designed to find dates for women is the last way I’d try to meet women. Echoing Eastern_Awareness, men have much to lose in both dating and marriage including the risk of false accusations and biased divorce awards. Related, I think more and more men are seeing women need them more than they need women. Women often need a man to help provide when’s most men expect to earn their own keep and maybe then some from day 1. Let’s face it, there’s nothing difficult about throwi…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 03:38 PM
1

I like that my male friends don’t constantly whine. I’d hate to see that change for the worse.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 12:47 AM
48

This reminds me of Reeves claiming to care about boys in education, while he refuses to acknowledge the discrimination that’s the root cause of the problem. I feel we will likely see the same here. If they aren’t willing to address their anti-male bias, they won’t win male viewers back.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 10:42 PM
39

My take is they’ve been hit in the pocket book hard enough that they can no longer ignore losing much of their male audience. The articles I read however said Disney thinks they overplayed action hero’s, but that’s not the problem in my opinion. Consider the flop of “the Marvels” with Brie Larson. The problem isn’t that she was a super hero, the problem is she had poor acting reviews and repeatedly showed herself to be a misandrist, but Disney cast her again anyways. Of course it flopped. Men ar…
/r/MensRights24/02/26 10:39 PM
25

Babysitting has nothing to do with random kidnappings off the street. It has to do with underage children being supervised and what risk that supervisor presents to that underage child. A young female teacher raping an underage student isn’t exactly the same as baby sitting but it’s a much better comparison than random kidnappings off the street. If we are going to talk about the remote chance of a child being kidnapped while under the supervision of a baby sitter, who do you think has a better …
/r/MensRights24/02/26 05:03 PM
8

What patterns specific to or at least related to baby sitting are you speaking of?
/r/MensRights24/02/26 04:26 PM
21

Exactly. These are much more relevant to baby sitting than stats driven by gang violence, burglaries, etc.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 04:06 PM
24

As baby sitters, I’ve seen no reason to be more wary of males.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 03:39 PM
94

Considering all the cases of young female teachers raping their students, I certainly see no reason to be more wary of males. Added: I think it’s important for boys especially to have more male role models in their life. Most of their teachers are women. Having a male baby sitter is a great, easy way for children to have a male role model.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 02:33 PM
89

Young men aren’t being drawn to a manosphere so much as the left is driving them away. Simply asking a woman out can be construed as sexual assault so of course young men will be more hesitant to ask women out. That’s just common sense. I disagree with the way the article says men are acting to their detriment. To the contrary, they are reacting to anti-male changes so as to make the best of it.
/r/MensRights23/02/26 07:15 PM
14

“A privilege is a certain entitlement to immunity granted by the state or another authority to a restricted group, either by birth or on a conditional basis.” What advantages are granted to men but not women? Name some. We of course have many laws advantaging (privileging) women. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privilege_(law)
/r/MensRights23/02/26 03:29 PM
29

Consider that most of the men’s rights wins have been by suing on legal grounds, not due to any great support for men.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 03:42 PM
37

It’s not so much that the right is attracting young men but that the left is actively driving them away with their anti-male policies and propaganda.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 03:40 PM
14

Men have legit reasons to be angry. What they should be studying is how the woke crowd gets so angry about non issues.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 12:12 AM
1

If I’m a man who chooses to identify as female, then yes.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 07:55 PM
3

Yeah, the left, feminism and woke identity politics are masters of twisting language to promote their causes. We see the same with words and phrases like patriarchy toxic masculinity, oppression, voter suppression, When people use such misleading language, I think it’s important to call them in it and not enter discussions accepting such false narratives.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 05:38 PM
5

Yep. There’s nothing positive about discriminating against men. The reverse of discrimination is non discrimination, not discrimination against men. These are simply inaccurate phrases to make discrimination against men sound okay or even good.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 03:30 PM
18

How is posting an article about discrimination against men misogynist in your opinion?
/r/MensRights19/02/26 04:58 AM
57

The article refers to it as reverse discrimination case. It’s not about the reverse of discrimination, It’s a discrimination case.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 04:57 AM
12

I think it’s important to acknowledge the underlying discrimination and hopefully reduce that discrimination, but it’s also important for us men to individually make the best decisions we can given the realities of the discrimination we face. For me that means I’ll date women when the right one comes asking but most likely won’t ever marry. It’s something everyone has to figure out for themselves. The bottom line is that addressing the discrimination and figuring out how to best deal with it are…
/r/MensRights18/02/26 07:12 PM
69

It’s the same old women don’t have agency argument which is essentially saying that when men to terrible things it’s because they willingly chose to do so, but when women do terrible things, they had no control over their actions. Feminists use this argument to justify women’s wrong doings and to argue women shouldn’t be punished as harshly as men if at all. Of course if one thinks about this argument, by the same logic, employers should be more reluctant to hire women and women shouldn’t be in …
/r/MensRights18/02/26 03:35 PM
11

Absolutely noticed that. There is clearly an agenda to equate being single with loneliness as a means to get men to date down and support women. Some of the loneliest men I have known are married men in a bad marriage, that marriage getting in the way of them maintaining or developing friendships.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 02:38 PM
20

One would think they acted such a debacle colleges would be required to treat accused students more fairly, but of course the reverse occurred. In 2011 Obama wrote his “Dear Colleagues” letter mandating that colleges adjudicate accusations against college men in ways that denied accused men basic due process procedures, ensuring many falsely accused men would be found guilty by these college tribunals and expelled. This made even worse by the Biden administration.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 08:37 AM
42

They’re a bunch of feminists pretending to care about men’s rights. Any posts that accurately state how feminism has hindered men’s rights are censored. It’s nearly impossible to make any headway in addressing discrimination against men if one is prohibited from factually addressing the cause.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 04:01 AM
3

Great list!
/r/MensRights18/02/26 03:26 AM
3

Yes, but I disagree with the “if”. Sharing a demographic characteristic with someone or someones else, doesn’t mean one should share the glory of their accomplishments or the disdain of their poor actions. Being a man doesn’t mean I should share credit of Einstein’s discoveries. Being a man doesn’t mean I should share the shame or punishment of men who committed crimes I had no part in. The idea that all men share the power or responsibility of the minority is to employ the spec or nadir fallaci…
/r/MensRights18/02/26 01:52 AM
14

That’s exactly it. It’s an attempt to belittle men who choose not to marry and draw attention away from the very valid reading they choose to go their own way instead.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 12:56 AM
126

Sad to see. Everyone should be equal under the law. Nobody deserves more protection under the law or harsher sentencing due to their sex or other demographic characteristic. This isn’t just a men’s rights issue. Treating people unequally under the law is a step backwards regarding civil rights and equality. It’s a move back towards classism.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 05:36 PM
12

There should be no such thing as femicide. Murder is murder regardless of the sexes of the people involved. The law should be gender neutral, with no regard to the sexes involved.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 04:04 PM
8

Yet, almost every day here someone posts a story of a female teacher busted for raping a male student. I have to say, I sometimes have mixed feelings about constant posts of women committing rape because they can come across as female bashing, but this is an example of how the never ending accounts of women committing rapes disproves the common claim women don’t commit rape as seen here.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 03:57 PM
12

Yeah, that’s exactly what they do. Discrimination against men = equality in their view. It’s a concept we also see in their country gender equality index. Counties that strongly discriminate against men get a better “equality” score.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 02:44 PM
95

⁠“formal equality must go beyond identical treatment” Well. That’s an oxymoron…
/r/MensRights17/02/26 02:58 AM
33

“Parental infanticide researchers have found that mothers are more likely to commit infanticide.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infanticide#:~:text=Parental%20infanticide%20researchers%20have%20found,that%20they%20are%20individually%20recorded. And of course we’ve all seen the never ending reports of female teachers raping their underage students.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 01:41 AM
2

Many of the laws that discriminate against men were pushed by feminists. One can’t address the discrimination without acknowledging the cause.
/r/MensRights15/02/26 10:00 PM
4

It says the area she was waiting in to get her results didn’t allow men. I quoted the article paragraph saying that.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 09:29 PM
54

Here’s the problem; “My husband was upset that I wanted Adrien to come," Taylor said. It turned out to be good that she did, though, because men weren't allowed in the back rooms where she anxiously awaited the results.” The husband wanted to be there for her but policy prohibited him from being present but allowed a friend to be present. That’s a problem of misandrist policy.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 07:39 PM
17

I’ve read many articles showing that more and more women (feminists especially) are shifting left while there’s been a little shift to the right on the part of men. In keeping with one comment there, many of these studies show left leaning women are more and more unwilling date men who aren’t progressive. This is of course very much driven by identity politics including feminism. Women are drawn to the party that advocates advantaging women over men while men are shying away from that. What’s am…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 05:10 PM
3

Yes. And they’d have even more incentive to falsely accuse men under fault based divorce.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 01:42 AM
2

I wonder what the real Elon Musk would say.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:24 AM
28

I echo nrverma The problem isn’t with no fault divorce, the problem is marriage and divorce laws favor women, women often making out very well in a divorce. As long as this financial incentive exists, women will seek divorce as a means of acquiring wealth, whether it’s no fault divorce or fault based divorce. Fault based divorce doesn’t mean women won’t file for a divorce as it means to acquire a man’s wealth, it just means women will have to accuse their husbands of assault, harassment, cheatin…
/r/MensRights13/02/26 07:15 PM
9

Too bad she can’t address female loneliness without having to trash on men. Even sadder that Cosmopolitan publishes such trash.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 04:00 PM
6

I usually respond with facts, but I’ve also realized that if a movement pushes a view based on emotion, you can’t rationally discuss the point with logic, because it’s not logic based, so any ongoing debate with them is pointless and only warranted if it might impact rational people who are paying attention. I’ve debated many feminists and never have I gotten any to rationally address the hypocrisy of claiming to support gender equality while at the same time advocating discrimination against me…
/r/MensRights12/02/26 05:46 AM
13

They say women initiate divorce more. I agree. Many studies verify that. What the article kind of side steps however is that this is largely because women typically gain financially by divorce. Similarly. The article says men loose more. Again, yes, men typically surrender half or more of their wealth to their ex., but the article kind of underplays this. The article overall in my opinion conflates financial loss men suffer in divorce with some supposed emotional loss men suffer which is B.S. in…
/r/MensRights12/02/26 04:54 AM
4

I of course never attacked women. I clearly said women and men deserve equal rights and justice. You are the one claiming one sec shouldn’t be able to discuss discrimination or injustices they face. That you think advocating equality and justice for all is misogyny explains much about your view. Thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 12:30 AM
5

You asked why Indian nrn would participate ina men’s rights sub. Threading is because they want discrimination against men to end and move they deserve justice. You seem to think that because women face issues, men’s issues should go unaddressed.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 12:16 AM
3

It’s unfortunate rape occurs and obviously it would be great if that and other crimes didn’t exist. That doesn’t mean however that men deserve to be discriminated against and that men don’t deserve justice. Justice for women and justice for women aren’t mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 12:01 AM
13

I agree. After decades of purposefully focusing on girls in education, makes are clearly under represented yet we still continue to justify focusing on girls and young women. It makes no sense, it’s simply discrimination.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 11:56 PM
4

If I understand you correctly, you are essentially arguing that because Indian women have legitimate issues, discrimination against Indian men and injustices against men shouldn’t be addressed. I don’t see the logic in that thinking.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 11:48 PM
9

Sad to see authorities stating that’s a woman.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 07:28 PM
36

If that’s true, it’s sad the authorities would release inaccurate information.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 06:06 PM
4

I did, and yes the information has been released which is how a few news agencies have chosen to provide the sex of the known killer.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 05:55 PM
5

The sex has been reported by a few news agencies, most however are choosing to avoid mentioning the sex of the identified shooter.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 05:47 PM
8

Because someone linked one of the few articles that mentions the sex of the shooter. The vast majority of the articles about the shooting I came across did not indicate the sex of the shooter, even though it’s known. This isn’t unique to shootings, we see the same with many other reports of wrong doing. For example, often the news will give the name of a man caught cheating but not give the name of the woman who is also cheating.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 05:35 PM
28

When the shooter is male, they almost always refer to the shooter with masculine pronouns. When it’s a female, they often avoid any mention of gender.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 05:28 PM
192

It’s interesting how so many of the articles purposely omit the killer’s sex when authorities state it’s a woman, but not when it’s a man, some even referring to a killer as “he” when the sex is still unknown. Many refer to this shooting as the worst in Canadian history, but I bet we rarely see that context and the fact it was committed by a woman together. Regardless of the sex of the perpetrator or victims, what a terrible event.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 03:05 PM
3

A movement is what a movement does. Feminism has repeatedly lobbied for and won laws that advantage females and disadvantage males. To that end they release a lot of propaganda that trashes men and over states female victimization.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 03:40 PM
100

One interesting thing is the AP has a policy of protecting the anonymity of a false accuser but not a falsely accused man. (They only have her mind here because she publicly admitted accusing him). Why should someone choosing to make an accusation be protected while someone who hasn’t been proven of any wrong doing gets their name smeared?
/r/MensRights10/02/26 03:34 PM
12

I remember reading about this long ago. Men traditionally voted more based on things like the economy, international relations, etc. Whereas women voted more in identity politics, socialist ideas and of course things benefiting women. This is why politicians, democrats especially could campaign on pro female, anti-male pledges, gain the women’s vote, but not lose many make voters in the process. As we saw in the last election however, democrats have pushed this to the point that men, especially …
/r/MensRights09/02/26 02:39 PM
26

For all the talk of equality, society is hypergamous. Most women want to be supported at least to some degree by men at some point, often when kids come around. MGTOW makes that harder. Men happily and easily going their own way similarity shows women need men more than men need women. Sgt_odball made a great point: the feminist patriarchy theory falls apart if men want nothing to do with women.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 03:50 PM
45

I think there’s a big difference between MGTOW and 4B. MGTOW is a logical reaction to the biases of marriage and divorce. It’s simply choosing to avoid a practice that has negative consequences. 4B is a sex boycott by some angry feminists who incorrectly believe a small minority of women not have sex with men will change anything. It’s in part due to more men shifting right.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 03:43 PM
24

MeToo took quite a hit due to some clearly false allegations, but given our gynocentrism, I have no doubt it will be back. I spend some time in higher education groups. Most there still think accused college men don’t deserve basic due process procedures. I can’t say what impact the Epstein files will have, but there are still sadly a lot of people who feel accused men should be treated as guilty based on an unproven accusation alone which is clearly prone to abuse, and could raise it’s ugly hea…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 02:44 AM
36

You made a lot of points but one I’ll comment on is that feminists look at the number of reported sexual assaults and compare that to a lower number if convictions and claim most sexual assaults don’t result in a conviction. There argument hinges on the idea that all or at least the vast majority of sexual assault claims must be true, despite no evidence of truth. One could equally claim that the complete lack of evidence in many claims is indicative that many of these claims are false. Feminist…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 02:35 AM
1

Well, the political science definition of liberalism has nothing to do with actual political liberalism either.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 01:44 AM
29

I used to be very centrist but as the left moves farther and farther left, it leaves me a bit right of center. As for men’s rights, consider that Obama pushed anti-male title IX protocols that denied accused makes basic due process procedures. Trump rolled them back, only to have Biden make them even more biased against men. Many of the policies advantaging women over men that have been passed since the 60s were pushed by the left. I’m not saying the right is any huge champion of men’s rights, b…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 01:09 AM
16

That’s very true when it comes to victims of paternity fraud. Not all men are victims, but victims are always men. It’s not true of perpetrators however. Women murder, women rape, women kill their children, women initiate domestic violence (more than men). It’s not always men.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 04:02 AM
7

I agree the tide is turning. However there are places such as education where progressive/woke ideology still prevails and they don’t see they are a minority. Anyone who challenges their woke agenda with facts risks being fired or expelled under “hate speech”. It’s great to see their DEI and other discriminatory practices challenged, but it’s going to take some time to see real change.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 01:34 AM
34

Where I work every search committee has a “specially trained” person in every search committee that ensures there’s no discrimination against women or minorities. Meanwhile, men are being dismissed with women and minorities now making up the vast majority of senior management positions. Women have dominated education for decades now, yet there is still an attitude that focusing on girls is justified. When more men went to law school and med school it was viewed as an equity problem that needed t…
/r/MensRights06/02/26 10:17 PM
1

First wave feminism is generally considered to have started in 1848. One could argue forever about when feminism actually began, but all the meaningful growth happened after Marx was born. Feminism like most modern day identity politics is heavily influenced by the Frankfurt School which in turn was heavily influenced by Marx. That said, I think to argue about exactly when feminism became influenced by neo-Marxist ideology is really a trivial point. What relates far more to men’s rights is that …
/r/MensRights06/02/26 04:57 PM
7

Society has long been gynocentric making it fairly easy for feminists to expand in that gynocentrism and add a good dose of misandry.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 03:46 PM
5

It’s driven by feminism.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 06:59 PM
3

I fully understand you are trying to conflate things that are not masculinity with masculinity in attempt to defend the anti-make term of toxic masculinity. You are certainly not the first one here to try to justify anti-male attitudes.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 06:33 PM
6

Of course men are told how to behave. Blame society for doing so, not masculinity. Masculinity doesn’t tell men anything.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 06:15 PM
7

Any attempt to portray masculinity and by association men as toxic is condeming.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 05:44 PM
5

If you choose to bring other men down, that’s on you and perhaps you are toxic. Your choice isn’t masculinity however. Masculinity is the set of attributes associated with being male. Attributes can’t force you to do anything. There may be bad (toxic) social pressures on men, but similarly such pressures aren’t masculinity.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 05:42 PM
47

Because society is gynocentric and hypergamous (and yeah, there’s nothing fair or equal about gynocentrism, but that’s the nature of society). Because feminists don’t represent all women. Many women want to be provided for in part regardless of feminist agenda.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 05:36 PM
6

Good point. To overcome the bias against men, the man needs to feel he’s got rock solid evidence such as eye witnesses or video evidence to prove he’s right, that will overcome any attempt to flip the script against him. Consider how many stories of falsely accused men we see here who were assumed guilty until cleared by witnesses or video evidence.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 05:12 PM
130

I think more accurately: Men are afraid of opening up because of the consequences. I remember hearing a recorded conversation of a man who was a victim of domestic violence calling a hotline and being told if the police showed up he would be the one arrested. I’ve seen college men report harassment or assaulted committed by a woman, only to have the woman accuse him in response, she of course being the one to be believed, the male victim now the one facing possible expulsion from college. When a…
/r/MensRights04/02/26 04:25 PM
17

Men take on the more dangerous jobs because men are expected to be providers and protectors. Similarly, society puts much more emphasis on women’s safety than men’s. Some of this so called choice is driven by gender realities. Logging is a dangerous profession. Can you imagine the wood shortages if we had to rely only on female loggers? There are of course situations where men aren’t just giving into societal bias but literally have had no choice. The men sent to die in Vietnam had no choice. Gi…
/r/MensRights04/02/26 01:23 AM
7

One doesn’t need oppression to face misandry. Jews aren’t oppressed but anti-semitism certainly exists. Almost everyday we see someone post about a man being killed out of misandry. Feminists claiming misandry can only exist if men are oppressed is a false premise. Don’t give them that false premise. There are literally thousands upon thousands of examples of misandry you can point to, to prove it exists, most having nothing to do with male oppression.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 11:13 PM
1

Okay, but that has nothing to do with misandry.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 10:51 PM
2

I’m not sure why you are bringing oppression into a conversation about misandry.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 10:26 PM
1

That’s backwards thinking. (The quoted article statement). Men have nothing to gain and everything to lose by not using a make birth control reliably. A women who wants to trick a guy into getting her pregnant and collecting child support has everything to gain by misrepresenting her birth control use.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 04:14 PM
12

I remember women using the internet just as much as men. I think early on however, it wasn’t so incredibly influenced by feminism, woke agenda, etc.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 09:43 PM
33

Yeah. Here in the U.S., it’s almost exclusively young men that are sent off to die in war, it’s men that do the most dangerous jobs, we have multiple women only healthcare agencies, no men only men subsidize women’s health insurance. We have women only healthcare mandates under Obamacare, but no male only mandates. Obviously such biases will impact male vs female longevity.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 08:40 PM
51

Iceland is known for having some of the most gender neutral laws. I did notice when I was there however, that gynocentric attitudes were very strong.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 07:13 PM
3

I can get a father wanting to protect his daughter. The real question is whether the court will have the same bias or give her the same sentence a male pedophile would receive.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 04:36 PM
95

But hey. Misandry doesn’t kill according to feminists.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 03:25 PM
3

I agree. Her feeling isn’t based on logic or facts, but rather plays in gynocentric attitudes which is a huge barrier to equality for men.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 06:35 AM
3

I couldn’t find stats on violent crime victimization by sex for London specifically, but the last stats I saw indicated men are victims of violent crime more than women and far more likely to be murdered. That said, the UK has seen an increase in crime that the government has been fairly incompetent at handling.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 11:05 PM
13

The feminist goal of advantaging women over men is inconsistent with egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 02:51 PM
2

Yes. But none of that changes the fact they refuse equally draft women even in a time they are fighting off invaders.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 01:53 AM
2

In retrospect yes, but at the time she was a successful CEO
/r/MensRights31/01/26 12:07 AM
2

The point has nothing to do with the area the fighting is occurring in.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 11:00 PM
2

Obviously their desire to protect women outweighed their desire to have women contribute to the war effort. If they weren’t so gynocentric then yes, they would require women to serve as they do men.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 08:27 PM
9

They’re not logical arguments , rather agenda driven, emotional arguments that unfortunately many people buy into.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 07:06 PM
33

It reminds me of an interview with Marissa Mayer then CEO of Yahoo being asked about feminism. Her response was that adopting a victim mentality is a hindrance to becoming successful. It’s a self fulfilling prophecy. I’m also reminds me of a popular “male privilege” list that starts off saying men are privileged in job hiring when of course the reality is affirmative action privileges women, not men in this area.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 06:57 PM
22

So many things related to that. Here’s 2: It’s like saying anytime a minority is victimized it’s a hate crime, even when the crime was clearly committed for financial gain, not out of hatred. It reminds me of the women don’t have agency argument used to justify lighter criminal sentencing for women. (They argue men commit crimes by choice where as female criminals have no choice).
/r/MensRights30/01/26 06:54 PM
50

One doesn’t need any special knowledge of psychiatry to see the flaw in their argument. There have been many posts here of misandrist women murdering men or boys, even their own sons out of hate. Clearly killing a male is more than just offending them. Sadly, too many people just accept such obviously untrue feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 05:48 PM
2

I never claimed nobody was living normal lives there. My point is that even when there was a huge threat of being taken over, they refused to use half the people they could be using in their defense. That shows just how strong gynocentrism is. Protecting females specifically is more important to them than their own defense.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 05:27 PM
9

We no longer hear women and children first when abandoning ship, but we certainly see news stories focusing on the number of women killed even when more men were killed. The UN similarly focuses on women and girls even when men are victimized more. In Haiti food aid was given to women but not men. Just today here someone posted how a Canadian politician is incredibly sexist in her portrayal of domestic violence with the end goal of getting pro female laws passed. Gynocentrism is as strong as eve…
/r/MensRights30/01/26 01:40 AM
21

It’s not just lads. Many big businesses and wealthy individuals are fleeing, eroding the tax base and putting an increased burden on lower income earners. England can’t afford to keep wasting money on woke issues. Considering bald women to be disabled and providing tax cuts to that end is a drop in the bucket, but it’s indicative of the larger picture that’s causing the UKs economic decline.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 05:06 PM
3

“Why women have a right to sex-selective abortion” https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/19/sex-selective-abortion-womans-right “Why I oppose a ban on sex-selection abortion” https://abortionrights.org.uk/why-i-oppose-a-ban-on-sex-selection-abortion/
/r/MensRights29/01/26 02:54 PM
7

Losing one’s hair isn’t a disability and isn’t deserving of tax payer dollars. The UK economy is going to hell due to all their politically correct initiatives. Not long ago they were the strongest empire in the world. Soon they will be a third world nation.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 02:39 PM
56

Not only does she exclude input from male organizations, she only recounts stories by female victims, not male, she refers to abusers only with male pronouns. She talks about the importance of women’s shelters, again insinuating victims are female and abusers male. I expect the new tools she advocates for judges are something like the feminist Duluth Model. She doesn’t even feel a need to pretend she’s being at all gender neutral but feels she can win sexist legislation by being clearly sexist. …
/r/MensRights29/01/26 02:33 PM
1

Well some Islamic countries may indeed be the only patriarchies left. Even Saudi Arabia now gives women equal voting rights and allows them to run for many political offices. The days of patriarchies are coming to an end.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 11:35 PM
2

I agree which is why I think it’s important not to enter any discussion based on the false premise we live in a patriarchy. Once one accepts that false premise one has already lost.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 10:51 PM
29

Great points and analogy to previous wars. Also consider the rhetoric we are already seeing that women are the most impacted by the war despite the fact men are dying in greater numbers. Another great point you make is that propaganda isn’t the feminist goal, rather it’s a means to an end. Every law feminists have won in the U.S. that I’m aware of was won by first getting people to believe disinformation about female victimization. The UN uses false information about female victimization as just…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 10:37 PM
3

While the biased Koss survey was claiming 1 in 4 college women were sexually assaulted, more objective DOJ reporting showed about 6 in 1,000 college students were sexually assaulted; https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/rape-and-sexual-assault-among-college-age-females-1995-2013 Article explaining how the wage gap (earnings gap) is a result of choices women make, not discrimination; (you can also go to the BLS site to see that they compare median earnings, and do not compare equal work as fe…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 10:13 PM
36

Even under threat of losing their country, the Ukraine insists on sending men to their deaths while exempting women from contributing to the war effort even in safer roles, clearly showing how strongly entrenched gynocentrism is even under such dire circumstances. If a country will risk losing its very existence to support gynocentrism in a time of war, it’s unlikely they will cease being so gynocentric when that war ends.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 09:56 PM
39

Several years ago, the UK proposed legislation that would have banned sex selective abortion, but feminists come out strongly against it, strongly believing they should be able to control what sex got to be born and which would not if the wanted to. In all fairness we should mention that under China’s one child policy, many couples hoped for a son, but there’s a couple important differences there: A husband couldn’t just choose to abort a daughter out of misogyny for the obvious reason he wasn’t…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 08:40 PM
3

A patriarchy is a system of rule by men that excludes women and is typically for men. Clearly our political system has passed numerous anti-make pieces of legislation. To claim it’s a patriarchy that’s bad for men is oxymoronic. The fact our system of rule strongly favors women is evidence we dint live in a patriarchy. (Along with the obvious fact women aren’t excluded). Societies have long been gynocentric, but feminism and woke agenda have driven that long lived bias to new extremes, including…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 05:23 PM
12

People talk about old school feminism vs modern feminism, talk about radical feminism vs mainstream feminism. I think that’s all a distraction. Mainstream feminist organizations have long sought to disadvantage men and to that end to demonize men. The feminist declaration of sentiments written in 1948 had anti-male sentiments. “The Fraud of Feminism”. Written in 1913 addresses how feminism sought privileges for women even then. Since the 1960s, U.S. feminist organizations have had the lobbying p…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 04:56 PM
4

I dated two women who were becoming therapists and their obvious gender bias was quite obvious. I imagine a radical feminist would be even worse. Has this person been helpful? Do you feel you’ve established a good working relationship that you’d have to rebuild with someone else ? I’d also be concerned with someone who says they are a radical feminist, but that label doesn’t change the quality or lack of quality of service you’ve received and likely will continue to receive. Certainly consider t…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 04:45 PM
57

One federal judge ruled that it is unconstitutional to require one sex but not the other. However when Congress debated the issue a few years ago, they decided to continue to keeping it men only. https://www.npr.org/2019/02/25/697622930/judge-rules-male-only-draft-violates-constitution
/r/MensRights28/01/26 01:22 PM
8

There are various definitions of a patriarchy. Politically, a patriarchy is a system of rule that excludes women from the political process. Obviously, women are not excluded, but can run for any office and have an equal right to vote. I, as a man have no more political say than any woman. We simply do not live in a patriarchy. (Another definition is where power is handed down from a male ruler to his eldest son. Obviously this isn’t our system of rule either). Politically, a representative is a…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 04:34 AM
27

Funny how advantaging women over men gets misrepresented as gender equality. Another user pointed out a similar bias in some of the country gender equality indices. I often run into the same with feminists here regarding policies that discriminate against men. Obviously discriminating against one sex isn’t equal.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 02:45 AM
39

That’s my thought. I’m not going to date a feminist so what they care about in regards to what men put on a dating profile is really irrelevant.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 08:41 PM
18

There are frequent posts here of misandrist women murdering boys and men, so clearly it goes well beyond just hurt feelings.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 04:14 PM
31

Well, we have laws disadvantaging males in education, in job hiring and in business ownership. Given these, I find it amazing that it’s a mystery to anyone as to why boys and men are underperforming.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 03:50 PM
2

Politicians won’t feel pressured to support equal rights until we address the enormous gynocentric : anti-male attitudes that exist.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 02:38 PM
3

Yeah, it’s easy to give empty promises on those issues. Republicans wanting to end DEI and affirmative action policies while democrats want to strengthen those has been an issue for a few election cycles now, so I don’t think that’s going to disappear. While I think democrats will continue to promote identity politics they will temper that some by placing more emphasis on affordability and promoting socialist programs as a means to address that.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 03:11 PM
4

I think Republicans will continue to oppose DEI and affirmative action. Democrats if given the chance will ensure anti-male title IX policies. They will probably try to strengthen VAWA services for women, cutting them for men. (These will be sold as rights for women). As we saw from Newsom we will probably see some empty rhetoric about men’s issues that in reality do nothing for men. I think most men’s issues will go unaddressed by either party.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 02:48 PM
32

I remember when Bri’s role in Captain Marvel got horrible reviews, Rotten Tomatoes closed reviews in her to protect her as a woman. She then followed that up with public misandrist statements. Now, one would think that between her bad reviews and successfully attacking half the audience, Marvel would have dropped her but of course hired her again which resulted in one of the biggest movie flops of all time.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 02:23 PM
1

Laws that discriminate against men of course men men are discriminated against. You’re just trolling now.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 04:39 AM
2

They don’t just exaggerate, they purposely produce disinformation to support their agenda. Consider the Duluth model which states Jen initiate most all domestic violence when many studies show women initiate more than men do. The 4:1 college women are raised stat is driven by counting any sex after drinking as sex. RAINN similarly conducts biased studies to over estimate sexual assault. Even worse, they then use this bias data to claim incredibly low conviction rates knowing full well their “sta…
/r/MensRights25/01/26 04:14 PM
1

A small minority of men isn’t discriminating against women. Laws that discriminate against men, well, discriminate. It of course cones as no surprise to me you have no problem with men being discriminated against.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 04:49 AM
1

AS for women, women owned business advantages, women healthcare mandates, VAWA, WEEA , etc.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 12:50 AM
6

Does it come off the wrong way to refer to myself as white rather than as a white person? The fact we are talking about people is obvious.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 05:30 AM
58

I’m white but don’t support the KKK and do support equal rights for blacks. Just because I’m white doesn’t mean I think white people should be advantaged. I think it’s the same thing with women who support equal rights for men. Just because they are female doesn’t mean they believe women should be advantaged and men disadvantaged. Many women aren’t feminist.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 06:51 PM
7

I don’t know how many men actually have Masochistic Personality Disorder but I will certainly agree that gynocentric attitudes are not limited to just women. There are many, many men who clearly support advantaging women over men. Of course we see education and media indoctrinating young minds into the idea men deserve to be discriminated against. Clearly, as long as such gynocentric views prevail, it will be incredibly difficult to win equality for men. If we look at most of the successes of th…
/r/MensRights23/01/26 05:00 PM
5

Nobody says red pill means movie. What people said is if you batched the movie: “The Red Pill” you’d understand their points. Obviously you don’t want to understand. You want to believe red pill is synonymous with misandry when obviously it’s not.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 09:40 AM
6

Well said. She’s been told several times where to go to receive the information, but repeatedly acts as if nobody is providing such. Certainly looks like a troll.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 06:06 AM
1

Perhaps. Men do take on the most stressful and most dangerous work, often to benefit women. Perhaps that is wrong. Personally I’d have no problem with wives choosing to work more earn more take in more stress, more risk, etc.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 05:12 AM
8

Why do you feel seeking a better understanding of how gender relations actually work is somehow hateful? Let’s face it, traditional advice of “just be yourself” or “just be nice” was really poor dating advice that ignores the realities of attraction that are now better understood. Blaming men under false patriarchy theory is much the same. As others have indicated men contribute much to society including women. Acknowledging this isn’t misogyny. Men producing the food women eat isn’t hateful, me…
/r/MensRights23/01/26 05:07 AM
7

I didn’t say the red pill has morphed into something it isn’t, and no, that doesn’t mean it’s misogyny. For example, some red pillers these days prefer virgins. That’s a preference not a gender based fact, but it’s not hateful, it’s just their preference which they are entitled to. (Personally, I think most men prefer women who are talented which means having some experience, but that’s just my opinion which also has nothing to do with misogyny. )
/r/MensRights23/01/26 04:59 AM
13

Well, I think the red pill has morphed into something other than what it started as. It started as seeing through the B.S. and nonsense and seeing truth about gender issues including dating issues. There’s nothing hateful about dispelling myth, uncovering agenda and seeing such issues for what they really are. Understanding the realities of gender dynamics isn’t hateful towards men or women. It’s only by understanding truth that we can make good decisions. That said, I agree the red pill philoso…
/r/MensRights23/01/26 04:22 AM
6

And I think there you have it. Men’s rights isn’t just about trying to get rid of discrimination against men. It’s also about raising awareness and suggesting how individual men may best deal with the realities of those biases and that’s where venues like this come into play.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 02:45 AM
9

This is a Reddit sub, not a men’s rights activist organization. Men’s rights have seen some progress. More and more states continue to adopt presumption of equal parenting legislation for example. Decades ago feminism was a very distinct movement but as time went on it became wrapped up in identity politics in general. Similarly, I think the men’s movement is less distinct but rather more a part of anti-discrimination in general. For example, the growing opposition to DEI isn’t uniquely a men’s …
/r/MensRights23/01/26 02:37 AM
1

Yeah. Once we open the doors to accepting any group deserved to be advantaged, others will try to jump in that bandwagon. Best to advantage and disadvantage no groups and rather treat everyone equally.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 05:46 PM
4

The sexism is in denying the role men play in making society run. Pointing out all men do is response that sexism.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 05:14 PM
3

Sounds like a good ruling. Time will tell what real life implications this ruling has. A federal judge in the U.S. ruled it’s unconstitutional to exempt women from selective service registration. Guess what, years later women are still exempt.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 03:39 PM
34

I’ve often pointed that out in response to claims that society would be a utopia if men disappeared. Men account for the vast majority of workers in utilities, in emergency services, in food production, in transportation of essential goods. If men disappeared, grocery stores would have no food, most of the grid would collapse including water in most areas. There would be little gas left for automobiles. There would be precious few women with the ability to respond to crime and emergencies in thi…
/r/MensRights22/01/26 03:34 PM
13

I think the root problem is we shouldn’t be advantaging some people and disadvantaging others regardless of whether they are a minority or not. That said, yeah, counting women as a minority when they’re not is a part of what had escalated the problem. Affirmative Action for example originally didn’t include women. Feminists argued women should have minority status under AA.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 09:41 PM
1

Yes. Men earn more money, women spend more. It’s a good deal for women yet feminists spin this wage gap as if it means women are screwed over.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 02:23 PM
2

Yeah, men work more and tend to rise to top paying positions more, thus the gender pay gap. However as you said women spend more despite earning less. In other words, men earn more but subsidize women who spend more. This is a reason why we see more and more commercials pandering to women and portraying men negatively. Men working more, earning more and subsiding women isn’t misogyny of course and neither is pointing it out.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 10:21 AM
48

We know he faced up to a lifetime. The month she got was nowhere near inline with what she purposely was trying to get him to suffer.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 03:37 AM
110

He spent a month in jail, but faced a lifetime in prison due to her lie. She should get the sentence he would have received had he been sentenced based on her lie. She got off way too lightly. The other intriguing thing about this story is that investigators for the most part just accepted her story, the facts only coming to evidence months later when thermally got around to an actual investigation. If there had been no “ BelieveWomen”, and instead if authorities had focused on evidence, thus ms…
/r/MensRights21/01/26 12:38 AM
20

Well said. That’s exactly the issue. Of course women and children matter but the fact is they have the ability to flee the war zone where many men don’t. Why try to focus in the women and children who have the greatest ability to flee? Why not instead focus on all those who face death and as a result of the war?
/r/MensRights20/01/26 11:09 PM
22

The feminist goal to advantage women over men is inherently misandrist. It amazes me how many people fail to understand this obvious fact.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 10:57 PM
29

Yes. Which is if course an argument based on a false premise designed to get men to buy into the boogeymen concept we live in a patriarchy when we don’t. Saying, we live in a patriarchy that has some bad for men but is far worse for women still supports their argument that women deserve to be advantaged. In that case they’re not denying men can have issues, they’re just saying they are insignificant compared to women’s.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 08:39 PM
84

You are being shunned and viewed as the bad guy because as you said you are focusing on men and not women. Society is gynocentric and feminists especially can’t acknowledge male victimization. They rely on patriarchy theory arguments to win advantages for women. Acknowledging male victimization and all the discrimination against men would undermine that.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 07:23 PM
4

However, men still work more than women. (A major contributor to the wage gap). There are far more stay at home wives than stay at home husbands.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 04:24 PM
7

A stay at home wife doing more chores is often the agreed to trade off for being supported by working husband, and it’s a good deal, allowing never to live a much bigger lifestyle than if she’s was relying on her skills for pay. At least one popular survey is very biased. It counts chores that a wife tends to do but omits home maintenance that a man tends to do. It counts wife gardening to put vegetables on the table, but not a man binging to put meat on the table. Not all chores are the same. S…
/r/MensRights20/01/26 02:45 PM
0

Conservatives may be no great supporter of men’s rights but they have been far better than actively anti-male liberals. Consider Obama’s anti-male title IX mandates which were rolled back by Trump only to have Biden bring them back. Trump had also been fighting DEI. Most of the laws that discriminate against men were pushed by liberals, Senator Biden being a big champion of VAWA.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 03:03 PM
10

All the studies are flawed, but up to 10% are proven false (by confessions , etc.). Obviously in addition to that many of the accusations that are never proven to be false or true must also be false, meaning the number must certainly be well into the double digit percentage.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 02:58 PM
15

There are many studies trying to estimate false accusations with estimates all over the place. One of the most widely cited is the Kanin study which estimates about 40%. Not exactly extremely rare. Even feminists acknowledge a huge percent of accusations don’t have the supporting evidence to go anywhere and are dismissed.
/r/MensRights18/01/26 11:08 PM
3

That post is right about one thing: it’s not the job of feminism to take care if men’s issues. To the contrary, it’s the role of feminism to advantage women and disadvantage men.
/r/MensRights18/01/26 03:31 PM
5

If they were truly about diversity and inclusion, they’d recruit conservative students, would recruit non traditional age students. Heck, it could include various hair color, heights and all sorts of demographics. It’s not about that and never has been. It’s simply a nice sounding way to advantage a few specific groups.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 04:02 PM
20

When I worked in higher education, DEI was in reality about convincing people to ignore the college’s non discrimination policy with a special interest on hiring and promoting female minorities especially followed by white females. They’ve succeeded in clearing men from most of the top positions. They’ve succeeded current female president never had to apply or interview to become president, she was just handed the job.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 04:42 AM
16

She committed multiple felonies. She didn’t just get a lighter sentence, she got the deal of the century. It would be good to know if the DA is giving other slam dunk, multiple felony cases so much leniency.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 11:58 PM
16

Great points. I’ll add that like most identity politics, feminism must claim women are universally oppressed by all men colluding (patriarchy theory) as an argument to justify policies that universally advantage women and universally disadvantage men. For example they won title IX procedures that deny men due process by first propagating disinformation claiming there was a huge rape crisis in college campuses. If they had more accurately said DOJ data suggests 6 in 1,000 college women have repor…
/r/MensRights16/01/26 09:49 PM
31

Sure, juries may be sympathetic to a woman who gives a sob-sob story about a single incidence of causing harm, but I can’t imagine any jury that would watch multiple videos of her purposely injuring infants and say she should be let off. That DA simply wants to let her off easy. It’s their job to prosecute, not let slam dunk cases off easy. Maybe the DA office in question is seriously under staffed and simply can’t afford to take a case to go to trial so plea bargains everything to avoid that. T…
/r/MensRights16/01/26 08:25 PM
30

I know. This wasn’t a single event due to rage, this was the ongoing, deliberate, tough out severe injuring of multiple infants over a period of time. It takes a special kind of monster to do that. Whoever in the DA’s office that decided to plea deal and only seek a light sentence should be fired. They are clearly not ding the job the DA should be doing. I hope the parents of these injured babies sue her to oblivion.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 07:59 PM
5

Don’t have to imagine it, we already see AI providing disinformation. I did a google AI search for rape conviction rates. All it provided was biased, agenda driven RAINN disinformation, no mention of any actual conviction rate what so ever. It’s similar when I search for college sexual assault rates. All the AI results are from biased feminist survey information, with no reference to more objective, actual reporting as published by the DOJ. It’s only going to get worse.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 06:54 PM
41

Completely agree. They don’t need a concession. They should be throwing the book at her. The DA shouldn’t be seeking to close this case as quickly and efficiently as possible, they should be seeking a punishment in keeping with the crimes committed.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 06:23 PM
242

They have air tight evidence of her committing multiple felonies, maliciously and purposely injuring many infants under her care. There should be no plea deal. When the DA has such a strong case against someone purposely injuring multiple infants in their care, they should be seeking the maximum sentence.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 06:20 PM
42

I think you are preaching to the choir here. Most here realize feminism isn’t the movement of equality it claims to be but rather has lobbied for policies disadvantaging men and to that end has also released a great deal of anti-male disinformation including revisionist history. Sadly, many people just buy into this disinformation never even considering the fact it may not be true. As I said in an earlier post I think this is gong to get even worse with AI which is already citing such disinforma…
/r/MensRights16/01/26 05:46 PM
8

A couple thoughts: ⁠There are men’s rights activist groups such as the national coalition for men that do lobby for policy changes and that have filed discrimination lawsuits. This subreddit however isn’t such a group, but rather is a place to share information and experiences. ⁠I have definitely seen people here discuss where men may run into discrimination against them and ways individuals can take steps to deal with the realities of the discrimination men face. It’s not just venting. For exam…
/r/MensRights16/01/26 05:12 PM
13

This is a big part of the challenge the men’s movement faces: Many people accept feminist disinformation over more objective information and this is getting even worse with AI. I asked Google AI about conviction rates for rape. All it gave me was biased RAINN propaganda, no official conviction rates mentioned at all. Try doing a search for college rape rates. The vast majority of results will be biased feminist studies. One has to really dig to find actual DOJ data. Getting people to accept obje…
/r/MensRights16/01/26 03:20 PM
2

Concise and spot on.
/r/MensRights15/01/26 11:37 PM
4

Thanks got it. Some great points there. Men wanting equality and the respect they deserve for all they have given isn’t “radical”. I find it amazing and sad that so many these days justify discrimination as normal and appropriate. On a slightly different note, but I think applicable, I’ve spent more time these past couple years paying attention to Memorial Day, flag day veterans day, the Pearl Harbor anniversary and other such events honoring what men have done in service to our country. It sadd…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 11:29 PM
27

My main thoughts: Yes, we should react to the present, not what was the case 75 years ago. Few people are still under the influence of discrimination from long ago. There’s not a woman alive today in the U.S. who didn’t have equal voting rights as men for example. Even when we go back, we often see revisionist history. It’s simply not true that women couldn’t bank prior to the 1970s. In fact there were women only banks in the 1880s. Many people believe no could vote prior to the 1920, when in fa…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 10:14 PM
4

The link doesn’t load for me..
/r/MensRights15/01/26 09:57 PM
2

Many great points but want to emphasize the implications of the Frankfurt School, so influential on modern identity politics including feminism yet so many people haven’t even heard of it.
/r/MensRights15/01/26 08:32 PM
14

A great book I’m reading is “Who Stole Feminism”. The author chronicles how feminist women’s studies professors went from just influencing students in their courses to biasing institutions and education as a whole. Influencing all the psychology department hires and what they teach goes a lot farther than a single women’s studies professor for example. Add to that DEI positions, mandatory faculty and staff trainings, DEI mandates, biased student orientation programs, incorporating how feminist a…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 06:38 PM
28

Affirmative action for women, the women’s educational equity act, women owned business advantages, women only mandates under Obamacare, VAWA biased title IX sexual assault adjudication mandates, etc. Compared to those, what laws privilege men? A few states allowing men but not women to go topless is about it. Things like men being stronger is due to biology, not any privilege granted to men. More men in politics is a matter of individual choice and voter choice. (More women voters than men voter…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 06:27 PM
70

Well, the biggest problem I see with supposed “male privilege” is that we have scores of policies privileging women over men, almost none privileging men over women. If you look at a list of supposed male privileges you will quickly see most are sex differences having nothing to do with privilege or are simply made up. One famous list starts off by saying men are privileged in job hiring when of course affirmative action privileges women in job hiring, not men. Sad to see colleges pushing femini…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 06:15 PM
9

He makes great points, and certainly false allegations are growing concern. I, however echo another user in putting education ahead of that for the following reasons: The fact that k-12 education is overall biased against boys, means this has impacted a huge number of males. A lot of anti-male sentiments we see in society are indoctrinated into young pliable minds through “Education”. In my view, we have no chance of significantly reducing discrimination against men so long as we continue to tea…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 05:19 PM
2

We certainly seem to be wired or conditioned to think “good for a woman” (but not special for humans) is noteworthy. As for things artistic in nature, it’s subjective. I certainly have no problem with figure skaters or female gymnasts being paid as much or more as their male counterparts if ticket sales justify that. The reason that women’s sports generally get less viewership than men’s however is that they are objectively not as good. The minor leagues aren’t as good as the majors so correspon…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 12:37 AM
5

Obviously Shapiro is someone who tends to have relevant facts more readily available to call out feminist B.S.
/r/MensRights14/01/26 06:47 PM
6

From what I’ve read denying money in an attempt to manipulate the person is financial abuse. So saying to your wife: If you don’t go back to work, I’m going to stop paying for your gym membership, and other discretionary spending” could qualify. I don’t know exactly where a court would be likely to draw the line. My point however remains that a wife is under no legal obligation to work or even do hose chores, but the man is obligated to keep supporting her, at least to a reasonable degree. This …
/r/MensRights14/01/26 06:44 PM
14

Except he can’t stop funding her. If he’s been funding her and stops, that’s considered financial abuse under VAWA (in the U.S.).
/r/MensRights14/01/26 05:56 PM
20

Boat analogy aside, this is an issue I’ve seen often. Wife wants to “temporarily” drop out of the workforce to care for kids at home, but once the kids are no longer at home needing care, wife decides she rather likes not working and refuses to go back to work, preferring her husband to fund her early retirement. The husband is basically stuck with this. If he threatens to not support her, he’s guilty of financial abuse. She of course is under no legal obligation to work or even do the house cho…
/r/MensRights14/01/26 05:52 PM
13

He had the money to hire good lawyers to defend himself and prove the accusations made against him were nothing more than defamation. The vast majority of men can’t afford to so clear their name so would suffer the consequences of the false allegations.
/r/MensRights14/01/26 04:32 PM
19

I guess it depends on how one defines “ruined”. Being kicked out of college and having that on record most certainly can have negative life long implications. Same with a career politician that loses support due to a false MeToo accusation. Depp decided to sue because he stood to lose many, many lucrative roles due to the defamation against him. As another post said, some people have committed suicide over false allegations. They are certainly not trivial in their consequences.
/r/MensRights14/01/26 04:26 PM
11

Feminism doesn’t correct disadvantages women have, it creates advantages for women/ disadvantages for men. AA for women, WEEA, Women owned business advantages, VAWA, Title IX sexual assault mandates, women only healthcare mandates. These and more create disadvantages (for men).
/r/MensRights14/01/26 01:13 PM
5

Yeah, it goes far beyond the biased family law and hypergamy I mentioned. False allegations, definitions of sexual harassment that include simply standing close to a woman, being denied due process under title IX…. The reasons men are rightfully avoiding women more than ever before are numerous. Thanks for the additions.
/r/MensRights14/01/26 05:49 AM
89

I disagree. In fact, that’s one of the things addressed in “who stole feminism”. Women Are credited in textbooks for things so minor, men never would. The fact is most of the significant scientific discoveries were made by men. I’m certainly willing to accept part of this may be due to social gender roles, but that doesn’t change the fact women simply haven’t made the scientific discoveries men have. Writings and discussions should reflect that, not focus on lesser accomplishments of women for a…
/r/MensRights14/01/26 03:39 AM
55

Feminists are masters at disinformation, revisionist history, etc. One really needs to know the relevant facts to make any headway discussing with them and even then it’s mostly futile. Feminists will never accept facts. Note how the feminist in that video deflected from the fact the risk of harm from child birth rate has in fact gone down substantially. We sometimes get feminists in this sub. I don’t debate them believing they will ever acknowledge facts. I debate them hoping other, objective r…
/r/MensRights14/01/26 03:16 AM
33

Certainly there are some lonely men, but I agree overall this issue is often very misrepresented for agenda reasons. Being single does not equal loneliness. Many men are fine on their own and one can have a social life with other men. Some of the loneliest men I’ve known were married. Their married life getting in the way of good friendships rather than providing it. Many men look at the biases of marriage and their dating options and consciously decide staying single and the occasional loneline…
/r/MensRights14/01/26 12:28 AM
42

Questioning any discrimination whether promoted by feminism or anywhere else isn’t rhetoric and isn’t something to be concerned about. We need more people standing up against discrimination. It’s sad to see such agenda driven nonsense passed off as research.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 08:09 PM
8

I think you mean 4B… Men going their own way and not marrying has been a thing for some time. MGTOW however isn’t a mirror image of 4B. MGTOW is about men individually deciding to avoid the biases of marriage and negative implications that may result by simply deciding to not marry. Men who do this, do in fact avoid these pitfalls. Men going their own way and avoiding marriage, doesn’t necessarily mean they never have sex. 4B however is a bunch of angry feminists going on a sex strike thinking t…
/r/MensRights13/01/26 06:14 PM
72

I personally had to face some false accusations (though not of a sexual misconduct matter). Good record keeping allowed me to disprove the accusations. I’d have lost my job otherwise. It’s hard to get people to believe how men wrongly accused are presumed guilty, until they can prove their innocence. A presumption of innocence doesn’t exist for men accused in higher education.
/r/MensRights12/01/26 08:19 PM
5

This is a place I see so much hypocrisy. Men’s only spaces get shutdown for being discriminatory while more women only spaces are celebrated as girl power. In some countries men are late for work because many train cars are designated women only and go largely empty while the coed cars are full, there of course being no cars just for men. There’s a lot of attention as to whether men should be allowed in women’s restrooms and locker rooms, but if course to credence given to men who may be uncomfo…
/r/MensRights12/01/26 08:02 PM
10

Many studies show that boys in average are more experiential learners than girls and also learn better when they get the exercise they need. Reducing activity and experiential learning has therefore negatively impacted boys more than girls. That said, I think reducing experiential learning has not been good for many girls as well. Teaching should include many modalities of learning, not focus on one.
/r/MensRights12/01/26 07:08 PM
19

I think the changes made under the women’s educational equity act to focus on girls should be reversed. No boys allowed college prep programs should be disallowed. I think they are a title IX violation. Colleges should stop their 2:1 preferential hiring of women in STEMs. Biased kangaroo courts under title IX that deny accused males basic due process procedures should be forbidden. Anti-male sexual assault “trainings” that bash men should cease. Ridiculous interpretations of what constitutes har…
/r/MensRights12/01/26 07:04 PM
20

This is something Hoff Sommers documents in her book: “The War Against Boys”. Personally, when I was in school, I went out to play over lunch, I walked to school, I did sports after school, had band practice, gym classes where I sweated, science labs that were hands on. Had I been expected to sit for hours without fidgeting like today’s kids are, I would have been ADHD. Heck, as an older adult I couldn’t handle what we expect kids to endure.
/r/MensRights12/01/26 06:05 PM
52

Why enter a discussion based on a false premise? We don’t live in a patriarchy so why have a discussion based on that false assumption? Feminism fights to advantage women. That’s may be good for women, but disadvantaging men clearly isn’t good for men. I hear you thought about the narrative getting twisted. My girlfriend is no feminist but still, when I talk about a policy such a WEEA discriminating against boys in education, her instinct is to blame the boys rather than factually address the di…
/r/MensRights12/01/26 03:42 PM
6

This is the same old tiring women don’t have agency argument. Men they codon commit crime by choice, but women are forced into criminal activity beyond their control. Related, I’ve definitely noticed an ever expanding definition of what constitutes trafficking of women. I think it’s ridiculous to claim women who freely choose to provide illegal sex work as trafficked. By the same argument, young men who choose to join criminal gangs should be said to be trafficked. To claim women who choose to p…
/r/MensRights12/01/26 02:56 PM
26

Feminism has won policy after policy that disadvantage males and advantage females. The idea it’s for both sexes is laughable.
/r/MensRights12/01/26 02:43 PM
28

Hoff Sommers addresses this in her book: “Who Stole Feminism”. Women’s studies professors realized they could only influence so many students through the classroom, so conference presenters encouraged these professors and other feminists to seek positions of influence such as HR directors, hiring committees, admissions, etc. Feminism as a whole has been very smart to focus their influence where it matters: Education, a strong political lobby and media for example.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 07:40 PM
90

I think feminism has driven the gender war more than anything else, but I agree the ability to falsely accuse members of the opposite sex have heightened this. It doesn’t have to be an app. MeToo, biased title IX accusations etc., for example. It doesn’t have to be anonymous to be harmful. Many MeToo accusations aren’t anonymous. Amber Heard’s accusation wasn’t via an app and wasn’t anonymous. It’s not just people making unproven accusations that’s the problem, it’s people discriminating against…
/r/MensRights11/01/26 07:11 PM
3

Exactly. Anyone who actually promotes people be treated equally and opposes discrimination gets accused of hate speech, which goes back to my point: How can so many people believe that promoting equality is hateful and that promoting discrimination is good and justified? It’s kind of like how so many Jews are democratic despite the huge anti-Semitism of the Democratic Party. It defies logic.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 06:05 PM
19

I worked in a woke, liberal college environment for many years, which of course included a very anti-male DEI initiatives. It amazed me how, with enough propaganda, one can get people to believe they deserve to be discriminated against.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 05:59 PM
7

Under reported, but also biased definitions and biased accounting. Georgia for example defines rape specifically as a crime committed by men against women. Other states have biased definitions based on who penetrated and who is penetrated. (So in the case of intoxicated, consensual sex, the msn is guilty by definition) Many stats omit prison rapes, one of the highest categories of rape victims to lower reported victimization.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 05:08 PM
8

Of course. Feminism advocates women be advantaged. Why would dating be an exception?
/r/MensRights11/01/26 12:17 AM
21

This issue of hypergamy often comes up in various forms in the purple pill sub. Typically women simply deny that women dating and marrying men of a higher socioeconomic status constitutes hypergamy or dating up. It reminds me of how feminists support policies advantaging women over men only to then turn around and claim such policies don’t advantage women. It should come as no surprise the feminists subs censor posts that draw attention to any policy or double standard advantaging females.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 04:30 PM
12

The big difference between feminism and the men’s movement is that feminism seeks to advantage one sex over the other whereas the men’s movement seeks gender equality. The men’s movement is consistent with egalitarianism, feminism is not. I don’t see that changing anytime soon. Even if the men’s movement wanted advantages for men, it doesn’t have the political clout to make that happen.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 04:24 PM
1

Misogyny is basically hate speech specific to women and as we we see with often see“ hate speech” it’s more often used as an ad hominem attack to cancel, censor and blame than it is about any actual hatred of the group in question. I’ve seen this used exceptionally well in higher education: young men are afraid to speak up, no matter how correctly for fear of being labeled a misogynist.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 07:09 PM
91

Even the data collected by the violence against women survey shows men are overall victims of violent assaults more than women are. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles/172837.pdf Men are of course murdered at a much, much higher rate.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 03:22 PM
2

Feminist continued advocacy for policies that advantage females and disadvantage males is a “fight against men”. Advocating for one group of people isn’t necessarily against other groups, but when the advocacy includes disadvantaging other groups as we see with feminism, then clearly it is against that group.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 02:54 PM
5

Some of those are a reaction to gender inequality, but they are more about individual choices than they are about activism.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 02:49 PM
55

This is exactly it. A husband commits to provide for his wife till death due they part, and pays a huge penalty if that contract is broken (which is of course why women file for divorce at twice the rate of men). Women of course have no contractual obligation to husbands. A woman can drop out of the workforce “until the kids are in school” but decide she likes not working and there’s nothing the husband can do. To refuse to give her money is financial abuse. She of course doesn’t have to have se…
/r/MensRights08/01/26 09:26 PM
2

I think there is hope for change in some areas. Consider: We saw Trump at least partially roll back Obama’s incredibly biased title IX mandates. Now we are seeing pushback against DEI. More and more states are slowly winning equal presumption of joint custody laws. The Supreme Court ruled somewhat favorably against affirmative action in school admissions Devine strong. Under threat of legal action, many colleges have been reducing their female only scholarships. Even some liberals and liberal me…
/r/MensRights08/01/26 08:52 PM
27

My response is to not accept the incorrect language you mention. We don’t live in a patriarchy so I won’t engage in any argument or discussion based on that false premise. I’ll just keep pointing out why we don’t live in a patriarchy over and over and over… until they either drop the subject or redefine their point without the false patriarchy narrative. It’s the same with privilege: Name any actual benefit provided to men that’s denied to women. Things like men being stronger, working more, cho…
/r/MensRights07/01/26 03:18 AM
20

Yep.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 10:43 PM
378

These days a young man approaching a woman can get him expelled from college or fired from a new job on grounds of sexual harassment. Of course men are appropriately reluctant to approach women. Add to that today’s young men are much more aware of what they stand to loose in a divorce. The article makes a good point about women being frustrated by men’s reluctance to approach: society can’t both penalize men for approaching, penalize men for marrying and at the same time expect men to approach a…
/r/MensRights06/01/26 10:16 PM
-2

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights06/01/26 09:05 PM
69

Great post! Your transfer of wealth point reminds of the wage gap issue as well. Men work more and earn more yet women who work less spend more. In other words men are working more to subsidize women’s spending so they (women) can work less. Yet feminists spin this subsidy of women as if it’s a female disadvantage. I wish I could be so disadvantaged and have women subsidize my retirement. It’s a similar misleading accounting with the country by country gender inequality index: the more women are…
/r/MensRights06/01/26 08:34 PM
-1

I think adults of sound mind should be free to have cosmetic surgeries, however: I feel elective cosmetic surgeries should be paid for by the individual. If someone wants a hair transplant or breast implant, fine, but they should pay for it themselves. (Though I’m fine with reconstructive surgeries being covered by insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, etc. I also have no problem with insurance companies offering supplemental insurance to cover cosmetic surgeries if they wish to) Wanting to change one’…
/r/MensRights06/01/26 08:23 PM
1

There are of course male feminists. I think I line with what you are getting at is that men’s rights is truly an egalitarian movement that seeks equal rights for men and does not try to disadvantage women in the process. Feminism of course is not an egalitarian movement, since it seeks to advantage women and disadvantage men. Women can therefore support equal rights for men without threatening their own equality. Whereas men who support feminism are choosing to disadvantage their own sex.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 04:29 PM
12

Feminism operates in a gynocentric society which aids the feminist cause. This same gynocentrism opposes the men’s right’s effort to have gender equality. The MRM now has to fight against a very strongly entrenched, very well funded feminist movement. For these and other reasons, the men’s movement can’t just mimic the feminist movement and succeed. The circumstances impact each differently.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 04:24 PM
22

There have been cases of such men being sued for child support. I think even professional donations are a risk. We’ve seen men who were promised anonymity have their names given out. Anything promised today can be changed.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 07:20 PM
4

Like labeling anything non PC as hate speech, this is simply a means to censor facts that may not suit their agenda.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 03:02 AM
24

Apparently it’s an epidemic because violence against boys and men doesn’t count.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 04:03 AM
4

My point isn’t about taste. My point is about bumble potentially allowing an initiate that violates right of privacy. I bet they would indeed much more sensitive to someone complaining about a photo potentially violating a woman’s right of privacy. Let’s face it, there’s a whole lot of attention being given to whether or not men should be allowed in women’s restrooms or locker rooms, but the fact is, a woman entering a men’s restroom or locker room is the same breach and should be treated just a…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 01:05 AM
1

Obviously right of privacy laws vary from place to place, but generally speaking if it’s a place where someone has an expectation of privacy such as a restroom it’s a breach if said privacy to take and share photos of people without their express permission (release).
/r/MensRights03/01/26 12:51 AM
39

The purpose of VAWA (U.S) was to make domestic violence a gendered issue so that resources could focus more on one gender than the other. In my view, a victim is a victim regardless of their sex and should never be denied help because of their sex.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 12:01 AM
3

Bumble can have any standards they wish, but if they knowingly allow a photo that violates right of privacy laws, then they may be complicit in the breaching of those laws. They were notified of a photo taken of a person in a place and situation where they had an expectation of privacy, the photo violating that privacy.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 11:43 PM
3

“In Victoria, Australia, it's a serious criminal offense under the Surveillance Devices Act 1999 to photograph or film someone in a restroom or changing room without consent, especially if they're in a state of undress or doing something private,”
/r/MensRights02/01/26 11:39 PM
139

This is a blatant breech of non discrimination under title IX. Harvard should lose all federal funding including tax exempt status for such discrimination.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 11:33 PM
9

Feminists spreading disinformation to make women look oppressed and victimized. Now that’s hard to believe.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 05:06 PM
10

Her book should be required reading for every educator and read by every parent who has a son. Most teachers and parents are clueless about the purposeful discrimination against boys in education. Creating better awareness of the discrimination at play is a good start. If parents really understood the discrimination their sons face, they’d be screaming for reform. The discriminatory practices that were introduced can be reversed. We can hire more male teachers. We don’t have to teach classes at …
/r/MensRights02/01/26 05:01 PM
2

I see you are being very selective in what you quote so as to misrepresent the nature of that post. You were advocating using potentially incorrect pronouns to either win favor with or purposely disenfranchise certain groups rather than just use accurate language. Much of the disinformation used to belittle men is based on inaccurate language such as patriarchy, oppression, toxic masculinity, incel, etc., so it stands to reason many here will object to using inaccurate language for agenda reason…
/r/MensRights31/12/25 05:56 PM
135

More men killed in a war: Women most affected. When food relief was flown into Haiti, it was only given to women, denied male victims. Many studies show women initiate more domestic violence as men, yet it’s seen as an issue of men attacking women. Most countries have far more men that are murdered than women, yet they pass femicide laws making female victimization a greater crime. Similarly many countries have special programs to address violence against women and girls, again even when males a…
/r/MensRights31/12/25 04:04 PM
11

Sadly most people don’t see that when feminists talk about women’s rights what they really want is women’s privilege.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 10:20 AM
52

Well, that’s basic identity politics isn’t it? Accurately putting all the blame on perpetrators wouldn’t justify advantaging women over men. To justify advantaging women, they need yo claim all women are being victimized and all men share a responsibility in victimizing. That’s basic patriarchy theory and sadly feminists have successfully used it to justify many policies of discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 10:13 AM
10

Sad to see so many countries embracing and consciously increasing discrimination and sexism rather than reducing it. What is it about the human race that cultures continually justify discrimination rather than opposing it?
/r/MensRights31/12/25 03:48 AM
13

Why do you feel you can’t write a compassionate story using accurate pronouns?
/r/MensRights31/12/25 03:06 AM
57

A good writer should use accurate pronouns and accurate language rather than misuse language to pacify feminists or support any other agenda.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 11:04 PM
2

Someone can both be granted privileges and denied other privileges. In some states men had a guaranteed right to vote (make privilege), while women enjoyed the privilege of being exempt from conscription. These days we have many, many laws privileging women. In your opinion, how is a young white woman dying of cancer, living on the street privileged over Oprah?
/r/MensRights30/12/25 10:59 PM
13

The idea women couldn’t vote prior to 1920, the claim women couldn’t bank prior to the 1970s, the notion wives were legally men’s property, the claim Women weren’t allowed work in early America: These and many other similar claims are patently false, made up for agenda reasons.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 10:47 PM
23

“The Fraud of Feminism” written in 1930 points out how even then feminism sought advantages for women, not gender equality. Some of the biggest opposition to women being guaranteed equal voting rights came from women who feared it might mean women losing privileges they had then. For example a husband was legally responsible for his wife’s debt. (Source) https://www.societyforhistoryeducation.org/pdfs/M15_Miller.pdf
/r/MensRights30/12/25 10:43 PM
14

Largely disagree. A privilege is something that is granted to some people but denied others. How we take care of ourselves and carry ourselves and how that impacts how others perceive us has nothing to do with privilege. This is based on typical, flawed identity politics that throws masses of people together in the sane situation based on common demographic attributes. Is Oprah Winfrey really oppressed because she’s a woman and black? According to this men are more privileged than women despite …
/r/MensRights30/12/25 10:28 PM
19

One doesn’t need to read beyond the subtitle to see the purpose of the article is portray males negatively and as problematic. I’ll be the first to admit some male influencers aren’t the most positive, but let’s compare that to the horrific messages many feminists spew, but we rarely see such articles calling out feminist negative influence.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 09:07 PM
9

You are missing the impact of the environment in which each operates. We live in a gynocentric country. Many people are fine with women being advantaged and men disadvantaged. Advocating for men to be advantaged simply isn’t the same as advocating females be advantaged in such an environment. Simply advocating for equality is challenging enough. The men’s movement can’t succeed simply by adopting feminist tactics because people care about women in a way they don’t about men. Besides, you are try…
/r/MensRights30/12/25 05:24 PM
61

True, feminism advocates women be advantaged, not equality, but that’s not the key to their success. They’ve been successful because they have a strong lobby, a great propaganda machine and because society is gynocentric. Politicians pander to the women’s vote. Shooting for more than equality won’t help the men’s movement, but rather would add to it’s criticism.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 05:04 PM
10

Some states such as Georgia specifically define rape as a crime committed by men against women. Other states define rape by whom is penetrated and who penetrates, which is obviously biased in heterosexual sex. Men raped in prison are often omitted from the stats. If we are going to use biased accounting methods, then obviously any comparison will be biased as well.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 03:50 PM
3

This reminds me of celebrities who purposely do outlandish things to get attention only to then complain about being hounded by the press. These women made a conscious, purposeful effort to misrepresent the nature of their brief, expensive space trip. Calling them on it isn’t misogyny. If you can’t handle the blowback from your own propaganda, then don’t create the propaganda. They could have just enjoyed the experience and left it at that but chose not to. It’s the same with feeling depressed: …
/r/MensRights30/12/25 03:31 PM
7

Most of the laws that discriminate against men are due to feminist efforts. Can’t address the problem without addressing the cause.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 04:54 AM
3

Thanks. Next step; make more people aware!
/r/MensRights30/12/25 12:38 AM
18

Here’s some: Selective service, affirmative action for women, women owned business advantages, VAWA, Rape Shield Laws, title IX sexual assault mandates, most states refuse to adopt presumption of joint custody laws, women afforded reproductive rights while men only have reproductive responsibilities, Women’s Educational Equity Act, women only healthcare mandates under Obamacare (no men only), several women’s health agencies (passed by law, but no male only). Women’s Entrepreneurship act. Men can…
/r/MensRights30/12/25 12:35 AM
12

Women’s educational equity act run by the WEEA Center, for decades received congressional funding and authority to influence K-12 education to focus more on girls. Read “the War Against Boys” by Hoff Sommers.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 12:26 AM
24

It would be interesting to know their thinking on that. I’m sure they will never hire her again but she was paid well to push her anti-male message at an enormous cost to the company.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 07:07 PM
34

In a previous post, I cited about 15 ways men are legally discriminated against. I bet most of the public couldn’t name one beyond conscription. Most teachers I talk to are completely unaware of WEEA, the act that purposely changed the nature of education to focus on girls to the detriment of boys. The vast majority of parents are similarly unaware that education discriminates against their sons. It’s hard to make change when even the very people in charge of such systems and most impacted by th…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 06:57 PM
26

Thanks for the link!
/r/MensRights29/12/25 02:50 PM
158

Interesting video. I like the point at the end: The sales losses were a result of not just alienating customers, but that combined with the ease at which those customers can switch to an alternative. It’s easy to grab a shick razor instead of Gillette at the store. It was the same with Bud Light: It was easy for disenfranchised customers to simply select another light beer from the store. Another point this video just touched on that I read about more elsewhere is that the Gillette anti-male cam…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 01:17 PM
14

So many problems with this attempt at justifying discrimination it’s hard to know where to start. You use the same basic argument that was used to have white only spaces denied black. It was wrong then and still wrong now. Just because a higher percent of men commit crime doesn’t mean women in shelters face a horrible risk of victimization. A. Men victimize other men more than they victimize women. B. Helping both men and women doesn’t mean they need to be housed together in the same rooms. Typi…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 04:24 AM
97

I feel any service that discriminates on the basis of sex should not be eligible for any government funding including tax exempt status. Good for you for no longer contributing to an organization that so discriminates.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 11:52 PM
9

I’ll offer a different take on this question: Men’s rights issue are not the same as dating advice, but men’s issues that you will never read about in dating advice that most definitely impact dating and relationships. For example, hypergamy, gynocentrism and biased family law mean men tend to get screwed over in divorce. It’s no coincidence that women file for divorce twice as often as men do.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 08:58 PM
25

I think if every mother read “The War Against Boys” and other sources documenting the discrimination against their sons in education, moms would be demanding education reforms. I don’t see that happening however. Feminist disinformation combined with gynocentrism means most people will never become aware of men’s and boy’s issues.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 08:52 PM
101

Boys are discriminated against in school. Women are advantaged in job hiring and business ownership. This creates all sorts of problems including a dating/marriage imbalance. Women can’t date up and marry up if we are disadvantaging boys and men. Those women going to med school aren’t dreaming of marrying and supporting a male nurse. They still want to marry up but the demographics don’t support that. The discrimination is of course also unfair and economically inefficient. We are focusing our e…
/r/MensRights28/12/25 07:17 PM
103

It reminds me of a work colleague claiming she golfed just as good as the men, ignoring the fact she teed off from a shorter and easier tee. (Not just shorter but often took hazards out of play).
/r/MensRights28/12/25 06:57 PM
2

Yes. It’s a very anti-male approach. We should believe what the evidence supports, not believe women over men.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 05:41 PM
8

Because not registering is illegal and can have legal consequences.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 03:21 PM
12

Examples of gynocentrism: Shorter prison sentences for female criminals. Rape shield laws that deny men accused of rape the same due process as other crimes. Favoring girls in education under WEEA Legally advantaging women owned businesses. Advantaging women in job hiring under affirmative action and DEI goals. Women only health mandates under Obamacare. Many women only health agencies but none for men. VAWA Refusing to equally add women to selective service registration. Biased tike IX sexual a…
/r/MensRights28/12/25 03:14 PM
3

For me, college years were probably the best so far: Good health, lots of people my age around, no job stress. Funds were tight, but I was fairly free to do what I wanted, when I wanted. Similarly, semi retirement, working remotely is pretty damn good. Moved out of a woke anti-male environment, most work stress gone, no kids to worry about, lots of free time. My health and finances are reversed from college: I’ve gotten a bit beat up over the years physically. I’m on a limited budget but can aff…
/r/MensRights27/12/25 11:00 PM
2

A little. Some liberals and some liberal media acknowledged the bias against men was a factor in the election. I think more people are beginning to understand why fewer young men are interested in dating. Still, overall, there’s no great sympathy, concern or even knowledge regarding men’s issues. Few for example are even aware of the bias pushed under WEEA despite how many boys it’s negatively impacted.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 09:17 PM
2

I’m sure one could go on forever but: The feminist movement has included lobbying efforts to win advantages for women, much like any other lobby. Convincing women to work more benefits businesses by lowering wages, benefits government by creating more taxable income (and by reducing government subsidies) and benefits retail by increased spending.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 07:08 PM
0

This is exactly why the Ford Foundation financially supported second wave feminism.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 07:04 PM
11

It’s the basic identity politics argument that incorrectly lumps all people together as one due to a common demographic characteristic: basically guilt by association. Just because more men than women commit murders with guns, doesn’t mean the vast, vast majority of men who don’t share responsibility. Similarly,it doesn’t mean that women who kill with guns don’t count just because they are less numerous. Individuals (not a sex) commit murder, a gun being a weapon many choose. It’s the individual…
/r/MensRights27/12/25 02:33 PM
5

The right is no great champion of men’s rights, it’s a mixed bag. Republicans did indeed oppose women equally registering with selective service. On the other hand Trump rolled back some of Biden’s anti-make title IX mandates and is now fighting anti-male DEI. The left in contrast has pushed and passed anti-muse legislation continuously. It’s incredibly anti-male, a problem some democrats and even left news agencies have begun acknowledging after the last election.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 09:50 PM
4

If a man receives a harsher sentence under femicide laws, it’s certainly relevant to him!
/r/MensRights26/12/25 04:22 PM
1

Murder should be just murder regardless of the sects involved. A code among some criminals is to never harm a woman, so by the same logic used under femicide that should be a greater crime as well. As you indicate in your second paragraph, besides being sexist, a problem is we often don’t know whether the victims sex was a motivating factor, so it’s often assumed to be even if there’s no real proof.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 04:21 PM
20

Femicide is the gender related killing of a female. In many countries, it carries a harsher punishment than if the victim was male. Despite the fact men are killed at far greater rates than women in most countries, more and more countries have made purposeful efforts to combat violence against women and girls more than violence against boys and men. Personally, I feel everyone should be equal under the law so I find such efforts to treat people differently based on their sex a troubling trend.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 03:06 PM
48

Kinda different from the feminist narrative that false allegations are rare and inconsequential.
/r/MensRights25/12/25 11:55 PM
15

Yeah. If women don’t have agency but men do, why would any employer in their right mind hire women? Feminists claim women are equal but then as we see here argue they aren’t equal.
/r/MensRights25/12/25 11:53 PM
3

It speaks to the power of propaganda when those who haven’t done anything wrong and may even be victims feel they have to apologize.
/r/MensRights25/12/25 10:54 PM
9

This is a good point. There’s not only a male-female bias but attractiveness bias. Look at the national attention missing young, cute, white females like Gabby Petito and Mollie Tibbits received, where even older women (and of course men) received no such attention and correspondingly less investigation. I remember an article written about a young black man who disappeared under similar circumstances to Tibbits, his sister asking why he didn’t deserve the same attention or resources to investiga…
/r/MensRights25/12/25 10:43 PM
51

Looks like the classic women don’t have agency argument to excuse horrific acts women do.
/r/MensRights25/12/25 08:42 PM
29

I can remember when people were arguing she shouldn’t be executed as a woman, despite men being executed for less. It’s interesting that you mention Elliot Rodger whom many think of as woman killer despite the fact he killed more men than women. (Apparently the men he killed don’t matter, just the women…)
/r/MensRights25/12/25 01:06 AM
2

I’m glad you have come to see that feminism and egalitarianism are quite different, contradictory things.
/r/MensRights25/12/25 01:01 AM
30

Good video. Motivations such as getting back at a guy, limiting political ambitions, etc. should be obvious. The woman who falsely accused the Duke lacrosse players did so knowing authorities would be less likely to take her child away if she was believed to be a rape victim. What I think was especially intersecting here however was the false memory syndrome and how easy it is to get people to believe they were victimized when they were not. I remember an expose that showed how children could ma…
/r/MensRights24/12/25 06:25 PM
9

My thoughts are: I think voting rights should apply to being an adult citizen, not conscription. I think a volunteer military is preferable to conscription. I think if we are going to have conscription or registration, women and men should equally be subject to it.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 03:11 PM
1

The myth that voting rights were tied to conscription existed long before Trump ever took office.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 02:51 PM
5

Everything I’ve read indicates that was never the case in the U.S. When the U.S. was founded only 6% of the population could vote, this generally being tied to land ownership (taxation and representation). Contrary to feminist disinformation, to the contrary, some of those voters were women. As time went on, voting rights were expanded to non land owners. Even today, there are potential penalties for not registering with selective service, but losing voting rights is not listed among those.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 02:49 PM
3

The misandry there is notable. It’s telling that a sub that blatantly advocates dominance is fine while a sub that advocates equal rights for all is threatened. That said, that sub isn’t large or influential and free speech means even misandrists shouldn’t be censored.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 02:19 AM
7

What hits me with this is how people here point out how common such stories really are, yet the general public seems to ignorantly gloss over such stories believing such atrocities committed by women are nearly non existent.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 01:01 AM
4

There’s a post in Purple Pill, a woman saying women should only have sex with a man after he’s given her everything she wants. Sadly, these aren’t outliers. They represent the privilege many women feel entitled to.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 12:58 AM
1

Well said and to the point. I think it was a wake up call for many regarding false allegations and the impact they can have. There’s some good in that.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 11:39 PM
1

Corrupt and biased.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 09:07 PM
3

Criminal convictions are a result of our judicial system, not MeToo. People made accusations against him under MeToo, but his conviction was a result of him being found guilty in a court of law. Similarly, his retrial is a result of our justice system, not MeToo.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 03:51 PM
10

Bad. MeToo is about accusing men of crimes (typically sexually assault or domestic violence) without any proof what so ever with the intent that such a public accusation will damage these men’s careers, relationships, finances, etc. MeToo is based on a presumption of guilt rather than a presumption of innocence. Criminal accusations should be handled by our criminal justice system, not via a court of public opinion controlled by agenda driven women. I’ve seen feminists claim that Weinstein’s con…
/r/MensRights23/12/25 03:38 PM
8

A business or industry doesn’t need gender diversity. It needs the diversity of skills to accomplish their job and to that end should hire the best prople possible based on merit. It’s funny how there’s tslo
/r/MensRights23/12/25 02:52 AM
4

It’s a fluff piece. There are tons of well written articles, podcasts and YouTube videos that objectively discuss men’s health without getting sidetracked by subjective tattoo discussions.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 05:34 PM
1

Well said. Anyone should be able to express and debate different views. That’s freedom of speech. Passing discriminatory laws that disadvantage men is something all together different.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 05:27 PM
3

They’re not. Charlie Kirk for example felt men should not go to college, should marry young and support a family. He felt that very strongly and would state so whenever asked, but he made no effort to mandate such upon anyone. It’s a value I disagree with but I have absolutely no obligation to act in accordance with his value. In contrast, women owned business advantages, the women’s educational equity act, VAWA, women’s healthcare advantages under Obamacare legally disadvantage males, discrimin…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 03:46 PM
7

I agree. Some of the staunchest opponents to adding women to selective service were republicans. (But it’s also not like democrats pushed to equally include women.) However, there’s a difference between maintaining a single sexist policy and actively fighting for more as the democrats have been doing in recent history. In addition, while republicans have not supported women registering, they did roll back sexist title IX policies and are fighting anti-male DEI programs. Republicans eliminated so…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 02:58 PM
11

The thing is, tradcons promoting promoting traditional relationships is just a value they have that you and everyone take are free to ignore. All the policies of discrimination against men, often pushed by liberals you can’t just ignore.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 02:15 PM
10

One problem is definition. Georgia law for example specifically defines rape as a crime committed by men against women. Some other states define rape as being penetrated without valid consent, meaning if a man and woman have consensual sex both equally under the influence, he’s the perpetrator and she the victim by definition. (This is precisely what drives most title IX cases as well). In addition to this problem of definition, male inmates are often excluded from the stats which both hides the…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 03:42 PM
6

If someone wants to argue that taking care of their own home or their own kids is a job., they should hire themselves as domestic labor and report the income to the IRS.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 09:27 PM
58

You should read “The War Against Boys”. By Dr. Hoff Sommers. It details how feminists were able to win legislation to get K-12 education to focus on field to the detriment of boys. I don’t see how any mother can support a movement that has created discrimination against her son.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 09:16 PM
11

Anyone can accuse anyone else of anything. An accusation alone should not be considered evidence of wrongdoing.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 03:52 PM
9

We are supposed to have a separation of church and state but as Sam Harris points out in one of his books, this really isn’t possible. Religious views will impact what politicians support and how voters vote. In the U.S., we have seen the left support many anti-male practices as well as other identity politics agenda and that’s sad. It’s great that’s finally seeing some push back, but sadly as the left and wokeness begins to lose some of it’s power I see the far, religious right poising to flex …
/r/MensRights19/12/25 10:14 PM
5

I agree. The main purpose of this bill is to prevent boys and girls from having sex change procedures pushed on them, something that is unfortunately becoming more and more common. I agree this bill wouldn’t stand a chance of getting passed if male circumcision was included. I’m reminded of a story of a woman who took her son to California to be transformed into the daughter she never had. Saving boys from that fate via this bill as soon as possible is a good step. Hopefully people’s disgust ove…
/r/MensRights19/12/25 09:30 PM
4

Misogyny isn’t systemic. Systemic (non medical): “fundamental to a predominant social, economic, or political practice” Misogyny: “dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women.” Is a dislike, contempt and ingrained prejudice against women predominant or fundamental to our society? Of course not. To the contrary, society is gynocentric, it focuses on women. We have passed multiple laws that legally advantage women over men. Your question is based on a false premise. (Clearly soc…
/r/MensRights19/12/25 08:50 PM
17

It’s worse than that. Drunk wasn’t a part of the question and the women didn’t even have to claim they were sexually assaulted. Simply having sexual activity after drinking was counted as sexual assault. This is a misleading technique often used in sexual assault surveys. Imagine if I asked all men how many times they have ever been pushed, shoved, slapped, spanked or in anyway struck. I could show battery against men is rampant.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 05:04 PM
49

More likely, it simply doesn’t suit their agenda so it goes ignored in favor of disinformation.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 04:35 PM
17

Not only did she not face consequence, but her disinformation continued to be believed and used to justify policies of discrimination against men, despite the availability of more objective information such as DOJ data and despite the fact many people pointed out the flaws in her study. Creating such disinformation is the feminist go to strategy which has sadly worked well for them. Such disinformation was key to winning WEEA, VAWA and other discriminatory policies.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 04:32 PM
45

There’s really no reason to make laws gender specific. Everyone should be equal under the law. Victims deserve help regardless of gender and perpetrators should be uniformly punished regardless of gender. The way feminists often win sexist legislation is to use disinformation to misrepresent the situation, creating a false narrative of females in crisis. A famous study in the U.S. counted any sex after drinking as sexual assault to grossly inflate numbers. Here, they are counting violence agains…
/r/MensRights19/12/25 04:08 PM
7

Good the sexism was acknowledged. I think the problem however is that such wins are rare and the awards fairly small, not enough to incentivize such industries to stop their discrimination.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 02:56 AM
35

Because society is gynocentric, because they want the women’s vote, because feminism lobbies for laws to favor females.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 02:29 AM
6

Same old tiresome women don’t have agency B.S.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 02:22 AM
20

Nobody is oppressed by a non existent patriarchy. A patriarchy in a political sense is a system of rule by men for men that excludes women or mostly excludes women from participating in the political process. That’s not the case in the U.S. (or any other western country). Women not only have equal voting rights but have more voting power than men. Women can run for any political office, they are not excluded. Another form of political power is lobbying. Feminism has far, far more lobbying influe…
/r/MensRights19/12/25 01:32 AM
1

I agree but will add women often try to outshine each other even when they are married or otherwise partnered.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 01:17 AM
13

Sad to see England going to shit.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 04:50 AM
42

I haven’t seen it, but consider the real consequences if men couldn’t go out after dark: Emergency services would all be seriously understaffed and dysfunctional. Homes on fire would burn, ambulances wouldn’t show up, emergency rooms would have incredibly long waits. If a woman’s car breaks down after dark, she’s stuck until morning. There would be almost no police on duty after dark. Crime would go up. Who would even be around to enforce such a curfew? Trucking and transportation would take twi…
/r/MensRights16/12/25 04:02 PM
12

The men should all start working ten percent less.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 02:21 PM
19

I hope any man interested in this position temporarily identifies as female.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 02:20 PM
25

They are using the no true Scotsman fallacy. Mainstream feminist organizations have promoted advantaging females over males, it’s not just a few radicals. Ironically when a feminist promotes equality for men, other feminists are quick to point out that she’s not a real feminist, and they are correct. Feminism is anti-male. One can’t advocate equality for men and promote women be advantaged over men. They are contradictory agendas.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 07:19 PM
44

Apparently, the Swiss are gynocentric like most of the rest of the world.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 07:04 PM
21

You are exactly right. There is a string disincentive for men to report domestic violence committed again them. I remember ind real recording of a man calling for help and being told if the police came, he would be arrested.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 02:17 PM
5

As you said, they justify discrimination against others.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 03:20 AM
58

Good news, but as you indicate, it’s bitter-sweet. It seems for every law passed that promotes non discrimination, there’s 10 that are passed that discriminate against men.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 11:31 PM
30

This is how countries, colleges, businesses, social media etc., pretend to embrace free speech but in reality control what people can say: They label any facts that dint support their woke agenda as being hate speech, misogynistic, etc., and cancel those who speak the truth.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 11:27 PM
37

Some myths that come to mind; Women couldn’t vote prior to 1920. Women couldn’t bank prior to the 1970s Women were not allowed to work in early U.S. history. Wives were men’s legal property. The wage gap compares equal work. 1 in 4 college women are raped. Men initiate the vast majority of domestic violence. (Women initiate more). The idea that laws that discriminate against men are somehow about equality.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 06:45 PM
50

Women have reproductive rights, men have reproductive responsibilities. A woman can take the morning after pill, can take the abortion pill, can get an abortion if not in their state another state. They can legally surrender a child after it’s born or can pug it up for adoption. Once conception is suspected, women have many ways they can legally opt out of parenthood. Men should at least be able to legally surrender parenthood as well. Consider that a woman can easily lie about her birth control…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 06:25 PM
33

She’s assuming American men are marrying overseas women, which I agree is subject to the same basic pitfalls one can have in the U.S. Most men moving to someplace like Thailand or Central America however aren’t moving there to get married. They are going there to live a less expensive lifestyle including no strings attached relationships or sex services, that don’t have the financial marriage traps she speaks of.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 05:11 PM
6

Thanks for sharing that. Good read, confirming the idea girls were shortchanged was always a myth perpetuated by feminist groups like the AAUW.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 04:46 PM
12

Major feminist organizations have lobbied for and won many laws advantaging women over men, clearly proving they are not about equality. They typically use patriarchy theory arguments to win these advantages, but: We don’t live in a patriarchy. Women can run for any political position they want, there are more eligible women voters than men. I as a man have no more say than woman. Feminism has more political influence than does the men’s movement. We simply don’t live in a patriarchy. The suppos…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 02:05 PM
2

It’s unrealistic. If a man and wife divorce and the woman moves cross country, she clearly can’t continue doing house chores in his home. He of course can continue to pay, perhaps even more so towards their children or to her directly.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 01:55 AM
85

Well said. I’m dating someone now and often wash dishes, make breakfast, etc. Let’s face it, the mental load of tasks such as washing dishes, throwing laundry into machines, is fairly minor compared to home maintenance and home expansion projects. Another aspect of this is that for decades women have said men should open up more emotionally, but men open up a fraction of what women do, it’s “emotionally taxing” on women. Women have long been sheltered from the real issues men face. They’re now g…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 12:08 AM
8

As I explained, it wouldn’t work. You can’t make a housewife continue her household duties after a divorce. Similarly, a man shouldn’t have to pay for a woman he’s no longer in a relationship with.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 11:39 PM
9

Same here. I appealed pointing out my post came nowhere near the violation they claimed asking why they thought it was. Crickets.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 11:34 PM
6

Yet many millions to women’s health (as the article indicates). I really enjoyed spending a great deal of time in Aus decades ago. It’s so sad to see how misandrist it’s become since. It’s totally killed my desire to ever go back there.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 10:54 PM
15

And sadly it’s not just Wikipedia. Trashing on equal rights for men as some evil manosphere is common to much of the media out there.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 10:38 PM
10

It’s impractical to say neither spouse should abandon their duties. A stay at home wife who divorces and separates simply isn’t going to provide what she did when she lived with her husband and family, yet the husband is often expected to provide even more in settlements and child support. It’s very biased.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 10:34 PM
56

The fact that supporting equal rights for men and other men’s issues is referred to as the manosphere in a derogatory manner is in itself telling. The men’s movement truly focuses on equal rights whereas the feminist movement seeks to advantage women over men, but of course that’s not referred to as the femosphere, again very telling. Certainly there are some bad male influencers out there just as there are many terrible female influencers out there but it’s disingenuous to lump these together w…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 10:29 PM
0

Except that the vast majority of military positions these days have nothing to do with combat squads. An aircraft carrier for example needs everything from cooks to nurses to computer experts to custodians. Many drones are flown by a “pilot” near Las Vegas. In an era when most military personnel fought hand to hand combat, it might have made sense to exempt women, but that’s not today’s military.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 07:52 PM
17

Do a google “AI” search on almost any political issue including gender politics and then do the same in grok and you’ll see an incredible difference. My concern with “AI” searches is that that such search engines can have a built in bias, but also that they often quote disinformation rather than focusing on more objective resources. The reader not knowing it’s poor sources that are being used. Another example: Do an AI search for rape conviction rates in the U.S. You will get an answer based on …
/r/MensRights11/12/25 07:43 PM
9

Note that the first thing it states as a cause of the wage gap is discrimination when it’s been shown time and time again that the main reason women earn less on average is due to work choices, not discrimination. Women these days aren’t expected to stay home as the AI insinuates, but rather many women prefer to stay home and be supported by a husband if they can. Personally, I don’t blame them. I much prefer to stay home and take care of my home than go to work, but that’s a desire, not anythin…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 07:35 PM
10

First of all, some people define MRA as men’s rights advocate, rather than activist, the two not being quite the same. One can advocate for something without being an actual activist in that movement. My advocacy for men’s rights stems from my advocacy of equal rights for everyone. I believe everyone should be equal under the law, with no demographic being discriminated against. I think these days however, it’s very politically correct to advocate discrimination against males. I think I’m more o…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 07:29 PM
17

Even a decade ago, studies showed that at least colleges were discriminating in favor of women in STEMs 2:1. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1418878112
/r/MensRights11/12/25 07:21 PM
14

Key point: “The rates of female-perpetrated unidirectional violence were higher than the rates of male-perpetrated unidirectional violence (31.4% and 16.9%, respectively) Note this isn’t about equal, female perpetrated being almost double! Also note how opposing the research is from the feminist Duluth model disinformation which states men initiate most IPV.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 07:18 PM
111

I similarly got a warning claiming I threatened others when clearly my post said nothing even remotely resembling a threat against anyone. Welcome to Reddit Cancel Culture.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 06:36 PM
9

The view women’s lives matter more than men’s clearly isn’t limited to the U.S., but is common throughout the world. Also consider how international organizations such as the UN focus on frmale victimization, even when more men are victims.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 04:09 PM
4

Yeah, conservatives were very opposed to including women in the long time male only selective service, but if you look at all the anti-male legislation passed, it’s all been forwarded by liberals. Conservatives have been reluctant to reverse a long lived discriminatory practice, but it’s been liberals that have increased discrimination against men by leaps and bounds. In modern history, it’s been liberals that have strongly pushed additional discrimination against men and boys.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 02:44 PM
11

I agree, but keep in mind most of the laws passed since the 60s that discriminate against men were pushed by the left. Obama’s anti-male title IX mandates were at least partially rolled back by Trump (only to be made even more discriminatory by Biden) The right is no great champion of men’s rights, but they are certainly better than the left.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 02:23 PM
51

Ceasing to work and staying home is called retirement. Most men I know would love to retire early. Employed or not, we need to take care of our homes. Being able to cease work to do so is a benefit, not a burden.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 02:15 PM
-8

The NY statute 245.15 clearly states that either the genitals, anus or woman’s nipples must be showing or the subject must be involved in a sex act which apparently was not the case. She is however being charged with two other felonies that do apply. She’s not being charged under code 245.15 because her actions weren’t in violation of that code. Time will tell if she gets off easy on the other felony charges or not.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 02:25 AM
-10

I agree with you regarding point 1. If his genitals weren’t showing and if he wasn’t involved in a sex act then New York’s “revenge porn” law isn’t applicable.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 01:04 AM
9

A problem in the U.S. is that the potential for coed trips means the troop has to have female leaders and all the leaders have to be vetted and go through special training. Obviously, these added requirements mean it’s harder to get the volunteer leaders needed and many events are cancelled or never planned as a result. The Girl Scouts have remained single sex, so why should the former Boy Scouts accept girls? If the Girl Scouts has a problem with not offering what some girls want, they should f…
/r/MensRights10/12/25 07:02 PM
10

This came up repeatedly at the college gym where I used to work: Insecure women intimidated by men lifting hard and wanting men to accommodate their insecurities. (And staff thinking this actually made sense). Of course, when it comes to weight lifting, if you aren’t lifting hard, there’s not much point to it. There was the same issue with the pool and other workout facilities. What made this especially ridiculous is that the cardio machines these women used, weren’t even on the same level as th…
/r/MensRights10/12/25 05:34 PM
23

I’m opposed to reparations, but paying reparations to men who have actually themselves been discriminated against makes more sense than paying reparations to someone just because they have the same skin color as some people who were oppressed 200 years ago.
/r/MensRights10/12/25 05:26 PM
8

Most male feminists I’ve interacted with clearly don’t know the actual views, agenda and history of feminism.
/r/MensRights10/12/25 04:21 AM
14

By the same “logic” retirement equals vulnerability, yet most men dream of the day they can retire and be free of the burdens of work. It’s funny how the luxury/privilege of not working and being supported by someone else gets spun as some great burden. If one thinks not working is some huge burden and risk, the solution is easy: Get a job!
/r/MensRights09/12/25 03:26 PM
5

Rape can include everything from a brutal, forcible gang rape, to an older boyfriend having consensual sex with his girlfriend (statutory rape), to regret sex, the woman later claiming her consent wasn’t valid. From the cases I’ve read, the latter accounts for the majority of college title IX allegations. Crimes, including rape are committed by individuals, not by a sex.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 03:15 PM
3

I think this fits with why women initiate more domestic violence than men, despite being weaker on average. They do so because they know men have been trained to not fight back and typically men don’t. However when pushed to where they will fight back, the woman is probably going to get the worst of it.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 03:11 PM
28

It seems people will always justify discrimination.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 04:23 PM
41

Women initiate more domestic violence than men. It seems to me that sedating men would only serve to make it easier to victimize them.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 04:21 PM
17

That’s certainly a part of it.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 11:07 PM
24

A point I’ve made often. Death is a solo experience. Whether or not you are married or not when you die doesn’t change the outcome.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 08:43 PM
6

I find bots are very rare here. Much more common are feminists pretending to care about men’s issues only to eventually start defending discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 08:40 PM
86

I think it’s a few things: They are seeing the downsides of marriage and relationships at a younger age, largely due to online information. They face more risk than previous generations: Simply asking a girl out can be considered harassment. Consensual sex can get a man expelled from college under Title IX mandates. Add to that, MeToo concerns. Misc: Staying single is more acceptable. It’s harder to support a wife given current wages and inflation. It’s harder to meet women’s hypergamous desires…
/r/MensRights05/12/25 07:42 PM
12

No mind blowing new info there, but I thought it was a good synopsis that included both the financial and freedom aspects of the issue.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 07:23 PM
6

I second this and think people get too caught up regarding trolling. A question, whether sincere or trolling is the opportunity to provide accurate information regarding men’s rights.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 06:13 PM
22

Just yesterday I received a warning my account might be suspended for the rule violation of threatening someone. In the post in question, I made absolutely nothing resembling a threat against anyone. There are definitely people trying to censor and cancel legitimate discussion of men’s issues, even in a sub designed got such and clearly there are Reddit moderators willing to side with them.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 05:52 PM
4

Today, I made breakfast and lunch for my girlfriend and myself as well as washed the dishes. I’ve been working on a wood project. I changed a flat bike tire on her bike and cut her lawn. She’s not a feminist and doesn’t complain women do more unpaid labor. To the contrary she’s appreciative. Honestly, compared to home maintenance, I find things like cooking and doing dishes quite easy and don’t get why so many women claim these to be such burdensome chores. An emotional one for me is when she br…
/r/MensRights04/12/25 09:43 PM
7

Yeah, as a more recent post points out, the proposed changes in England are very biased, denying the accused basic due process. It’s also problematic to have different procedures for different crimes. Everyone deserves due process. The fact the accuser is considered the victim before it’s been proven is also a huge bias.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 08:00 PM
1

I agree that women are overall influenced by emotional arguments more so than men, but that doesn’t men one can’t fight incorrect emotional conclusions with reasoning and logic. Also, this generality doesn’t fit all men and all women.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 05:56 PM
21

Note that this comes from the perspective that the accusing female is in fact the victim before this has been established in a court of law. Those being accused should have the right to question their accuser about anything of relevance, including the accuser’s history of lying about such things. “Perhaps the most troubling aspect of Rape Shield laws is their potential to exclude relevant evidence that might help exonerate a defendant.” : Georgetown Law
/r/MensRights03/12/25 04:12 PM
10

Being providing for at another person’s expense is not being oppressed.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 04:12 AM
92

Most women I know would rather have a husband with a high paying job to support them in a nice lifestyle than have a high paying job themselves and support someone else. This is a part of why societies are hypergamous.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 02:37 AM
3

Funny how feminists want to point out women earn less, but want to shut down any comments as to why they work less and earn less.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 04:44 PM
14

In most countries the number of men who are murdered is multiple times. more than women. In most western countries at least, the number of male victims of violent crimes outweighs female victimization. Yet, despite this higher male victimization many countries have one sided laws focusing on female victimization as being a bigger problem. It’s not rational, it’s simply gynocentric. It’s much the same with how organizations such as the UN approach victimization.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 04:20 PM
59

Even a 110 year old grandmother was guaranteed the same voting rights as men under the 19th amendment when she came of voting age. Consider: When the U.S. was founded few women could vote, but there were some and the vast majority of men couldn’t vote either. Some feminists claim women couldn’t bank prior to the 1960s, when in reality there were entire women only banks in the 1800s. Contrary to feminist claims, wives were not the legal property of their husbands. Women could and did in fact work…
/r/MensRights30/11/25 04:14 PM
20

The study feminists love to quote is biased in what it does and does not measure. A problem with all these studies lies in comparing self reported data about house chores to hours of employment as if they are equally reported or of equal value. Is it fair to compare 8 hours of watching TV with laundry in the machine to 8 hours at the office? Is 8 hours of leisurely gardening, gardening what you desire the same as a farmer spending 8 hours? If a husband paints 3 walls of a room in the same time a…
/r/MensRights29/11/25 03:52 PM
12

More and more men are suing and wining, but it’s still far from most.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 09:49 PM
3

AI is essentially a computer program which can be designed with built in biases. If most of the information AI is searching is biased, then the results will be biased, and let’s face it, feminist disinformation often far outweighs the facts. Do a search on a PC subject with Google AI, then do it with Grok. The difference shows the bias.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 03:17 PM
73

More women who make false accusations need to be held accountable. Even the women who was proven to have filed a false police report and was proven to have committed perjury in the Duke lacrosse case was never held responsible for her false claims. Colleges should not be conducting kangaroo trials. Regardless of their findings, this university should have to pay reparations and punitive damages for putting a man known to be innocent through this.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 02:04 PM
35

Feminism has never wanted equality as shown by their continued efforts to win policies advantaging females over males.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 01:55 PM
9

We already have an employment structure that allows women to work as much as men. Women choose to work less and choose safer, more enjoyable often lower paying work. Most women want to be at least partially supported by a husband.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 01:46 PM
113

Men work more (and do more dangerous work) and earn more, but subsidize women who work less, earn less but spend more than men. And feminists complain about this?
/r/MensRights27/11/25 10:00 PM
1

You say the MRM is like feminism, but provide absolutely no examples of the MRM lobbying for policies that advocate against women, (the way feminists lobby. The MRM is an egalitarian movement that advocates gender equality and non discrimination, feminism is not.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 08:14 PM
36

Men work and earn more than women. Women spend more than men. In other words men subsidize women. Overall women are more dependent on men than the reverse. Imagine if men ceased to exist. Farming, transport of goods and most essential services would come screaming to a stop.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 11:49 PM
15

At least on college campuses, the misandry and power has gotten worse over time. It’s not just numbers but the buy in and power. 20 years ago, feminism was strong but one could either ignore it or argue against it, but then it as with identity politics in general it got real power. Factually criticizing feminism became classified as hate speech potentially resulting in probation or even dismissal.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 03:16 PM
7

Alimony, division of wealth and child custody need to stop being biased in favor of women.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 03:13 AM
1

A discrimination lawsuit was filed against Uber and Lyft in California I believe.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 02:26 AM
6

Government set our system up. (Women actually have more voting power than men).
/r/MensRights25/11/25 10:32 PM
4

Prosecutors want her to serve 18 months. Time will tell Joe dues actually sentenced.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 04:41 AM
6

When the U.S. became a country only 6% of the population could vote, sine if those were in fact women. To this day there is no constitutional right to vote for either men or women.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 03:35 AM
19

He gave unequal criminal sentencing as an example that’s not egalitarian, but it’s not just about crime and he didn’t claim so. We have unequal laws disadvantaging males in education, in job hiring, in business ownership, in military service, in healthcare and more. This is not egalitarian, it’s discriminatory.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 08:26 PM
18

Feminist won laws that disadvantages men and advantages women, obviously mean men, not women are legally disadvantaged in these areas. Such laws of discrimination are not egalitarian, they are the opposite of promoting equality. We do of course have some egalitarian legislation such as the 19th amendment and equal pay act that prohibit discrimination and promote the equal treatment people.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 08:05 PM
136

Feminism and egalitarianism are contradictory ideologies. You can’t advocate women be advantaged and advocate people be treated equally, they are opposing agendas.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 07:51 PM
84

In order for feminists to win policies advantaging females over males, they need to sell the idea women are universally victimized by male oppressors. (Patriarchy theory). Acknowledging the discrimination against men and other issues men face threatens their agenda, so will be criticized.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 05:59 PM
19

Respectfully, I don’t think equality has ever been the point of feminism. “The Fraud of Feminism” written in 1930, documents how even then feminism sought advantages for women such as lighter prison sentencing.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 05:38 PM
93

It’s a great example of what happens in echo chambers that prohibit factual information.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 04:05 PM
1

Fortunately more states are seeing that and adopting joint parenting laws.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 11:16 AM
11

I think you address many valid points. I think you really nailed it with your comment about why it’s valid to focus on why it’s an issue because women are negatively impacted despite the fact men are negatively impacted far more. Focusing on women being murdered for example, when in reality, men are murdered far more than women are.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 05:52 AM
2

My thought exactly. More men should start identifying as female to apply for such jobs (they can later claim to be gender fluid). Fight woke identity politics with woke identity politics I say.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 11:47 PM
2

Men may fight for custody less often than women, but that doesn’t change the fact that many states have a bias towards mothers, only a minority of states having assumption of joint custody laws.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 10:37 PM
1

I agree we shouldn’t automatically believe anyone, but sadly there is often a tendency to automatically BelieveWomen, throwing out the presumption of innocence. Studies vary greatly in how often false reports occur, the Kanin study finding 41%. Certainly unofficial accusations such as MeToo or college accusations have a much higher false rate than false police reporting.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 07:58 PM
5

I absolutely think we need age of consent laws to protect less mature underage individuals, but there are issues when as you said, females tend to date older. Some women have more sexual experience at 16 than many men at 19. I’ve certainly seen girls of that age who know how to appear 25. So, the idea the older young man is more mature, more experienced, etc., doesn’t necessarily hold true. We see the same flawed logic in assuming a male college professor holds tremendous power over a younger fe…
/r/MensRights20/11/25 04:26 PM
22

Divorce doesn’t just allow women to leave a marriage without penalty, but usually to profit by doing so. It’s that along with biased child custody laws that are the real problem. I guarantee that if women had to give men money in a divorce and if men were typically awarded child custody, we wouldn’t see women filing for 2/3 of divorces.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 04:06 PM
21

I always get a laugh out of women or girls complaining about dress codes, when such codes are almost always more restrictive for men. Women complaining that sleeveless dresses aren’t appropriate when men are required to wear jackets and ties for example.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 08:19 PM
18

Which I suspect is why they don’t want to acknowledge the discrimination: they want females to continue to receive most of the resources and advantages.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 07:50 PM
58

While there’s certainly some good in this, I noted the strategy focuses on a supposed reluctance on the part of men to seek help. (Essentially blaming men). I see nothing that addresses the discrimination and biases in the healthcare system or biases that cause more men to contemplate suicide. How about actually acknowledging and addressing the discrimination against men?
/r/MensRights19/11/25 07:26 PM
110

It wasn’t that long ago, that the whole idea was to go to a public establishment with the point being to meet and mingle with others. This idea that simply talking to new people is wrong, dangerous and constitutes harassment is a big part of what’s causing a gender divide.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 07:20 PM
36

Such comments sicken me, but show how much a men’s movement is needed.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:19 AM
161

I’ve seen other cases of the same. It’s really messed up to hold the victim financially responsible for the action of the perpetrator. Imagine the reverse: telling a young female rape victim she has to have the child, has to give her rapist custody and then has to pay him for the child’s upbringing.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 01:57 AM
2

If men and women were truly equal in all ways, we wouldn’t have words distinguishing them: they would be the same. We have two sexes precisely because of the ways we are unequal or different. We have separate sports out of an acknowledgement men and women have unequal athletic ability, but then many feminists want equal pay as if they are producing the same thing, when we’re already acknowledged, they aren’t. It’s like arguing baseball major and minor leagues are equal. Marriages are of course n…
/r/MensRights18/11/25 04:10 PM
21

Not to mention the many laws feminists have won that legally discriminate against men. Feminism is actively anti-male. It’s contradictory to support an anti-male movement and claim to support men’s issues. They are opposing agendas.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 03:29 PM
54

What a bunch of B.S. Boys and young men aren’t falling behind in education because of misogyny, they are falling behind because they are discriminated against. Men becoming feminist is like black people joining the KKK: it makes no sense to join that which is against you.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 02:01 PM
3

Society is gynocentric so both political parties cater to this, the left especially.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 01:57 PM
24

“Id be happier if I divorced you, take half your money and eventually do the same to some other schmuck”.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 01:38 AM
1

Too bad. I know some of the studies he linked had been removed. That’s a big problem I see: a lot of facts that disprove feminist disinformation are getting removed.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 06:09 PM
48

Less likely to be murderers than men but of course the vast majority of men and women are not murderers. Women are also far less likely to be murdered.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 09:04 PM
16

The article of course offers no evidence that there is any imbalance in “emotional labor.” It sounds like the women in question feel that a relationship shouldn’t be any work on their part.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 04:14 PM
45

One of the “trainings” used by colleges is called the innocent bystander training. It essentially states men as a sex are rapists alerts looking for the opportunity to rape women. A few rare men however can intervene (the innocent bystanders) and be partially redeemed. So essentially, a man who intervenes to prevent a sexual assault MIGHT NOT be dangerous according to the model.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 02:29 PM
2

The default should always be equality. It’s sad to see this step backwards from that.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 09:34 PM
2

I think incentivizing votary service results in a a more capable military and U.S. much more fair.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 05:35 PM
21

Patriarchy is the feminist boogeyman they can blame all their made up victimization on. It exists only in the minds of feminists.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 04:57 PM
38

Masculinity: primarily responsible for all our roads, bridges, buildings, ships, and other infrastructure that makes our society work. Masculinity: Responsible for defending our freedom. Masculinity: primarily responsible for producing all the food we consume and transporting it to market. Masculinity: Stepping up to earn the majority of money which is spent primarily by women. Masculinity: responsible for most of our police, paramedics, firefighters and other first responders that minimize the …
/r/MensRights14/11/25 12:17 AM
2

Go for it.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 11:44 PM
2

Personally, I don’t think women are naturally less capable. I think the problem is companies sometimes hire women who are poor choices due to affirmative action or DEI pressures.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 11:42 PM
1

Yes. That’s part of my point. Articles that claim men who aren’t in relationships are lonely are discounting friendships and over playing romantic relationships.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 04:12 PM
4

While there most certainly are some very lonely men out there, I think this is often misrepresented for agenda reasons. Many articles assume a man who isn’t romantically involved with a woman must be lonely, both failing to recognize that other men can provide companionship, (as well as women one isn’t romantically involved with) and falsely assuming being in a relationship is the key to avoiding loneliness. Some of the most lonely men I know are married, their marriage preventing the social int…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 04:07 PM
8

Even mainstream feminism isn’t about equality as witnessed by the many policies mainstream feminists organizations have won that advantage females over males.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:44 PM
32

If an 18 year old woman deciding to have sex robs her of her youth well then the majority of young women have been robbed of their own sex by their own choice, same with young men.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 02:25 PM
27

I saw this elsewhere. The problem I see is that like Reeves, he’s trying to address men’s issues but still trying to support feminism, feminist policies of discrimination of course being some of the top root causes of men’s issues. Nowhere in this video does he really come out and address the discrimination that’s the root cause of the problem, in fact he kind of blames men saying they haven’t been good role models, etc. It really says something about where we are at when some of the most notabl…
/r/MensRights12/11/25 09:15 PM
16

Society is gynocentric. Politicians want to win the women’s vote. Feminism has a very powerful lobby that disseminates a lot of disinformation. Media and education is strongly feminist. We can’t support feminism and men’s issues since they have opposing goals. (The feminist goal to advantage women over men directly contradicts the MRM’s goal of equal rights.)
/r/MensRights12/11/25 05:11 PM
6

Yep. Only an incredibly small fraction of one percent of men and women will ever become a CEO and that’s fine. Why make such a big deal out of a job that the vast, vast majority of people will never have?
/r/MensRights12/11/25 04:21 PM
12

This is so obvious, it’s amazing this issue is even debatable. Most CEO roles will go to those who have made career choices positioning them to become a CEO and that’s largely men. Female dominated career choices such as teaching and nursing are unlikely to lead to a CEO position.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 04:15 PM
29

The premise is wrong. There are over 30 female CEOs of S&P 500 companies and many more female CEOs of other major companies. https://research.com/careers/female-ceos-of-the-sp-500
/r/MensRights12/11/25 02:31 PM
41

Men overall work more and earn more (gender pay gap), yet women spend more. There is a transfer of wealth from men who work servant more to women who fiend this money. Yet feminists complain about this female benefit.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 10:05 PM
8

I live in a western country, not patriarchy.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 07:02 PM
1

California was at the forefront of pushing biased college protocols, bad for men. Sure, California judges have upheld some non discrimination laws. They are law after all. That doesn’t mean it’s overall promoted men’s issues.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 04:16 PM
23

It will be interesting to see how this lawsuit goes. Uber’s practice is clearly a violation of California’s non discrimination law, but in the past we’ve seen judges rule that violating non discrimination law is justified to help and protect women. (As we’ve seen with title IX rulings for example).
/r/MensRights11/11/25 03:44 PM
10

Newsom spoke to men, but much of what he proposed doesn’t actually benefit men. For example, he said men should volunteer more (work for free more). That’s not for men’s betterment. Has he in anyway endorsed removing California’s biased affirmative consent laws? Had he ever pushed for California to adopt equal presumption of joint custody laws? Of course not. He wants to win men’s votes back with empty talking points that don’t actually address the discrimination men face.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 03:30 AM
30

This reminds me of how some colleges, criticized for their bias in women’s studies only courses started “men’s studies” courses which of course in reality are feminist courses that are wolves in sheep’s clothing that tell men how evil they are.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 12:31 AM
3

But not all women are feminists…. (And there are male feminists for some odd reason).
/r/MensRights11/11/25 12:24 AM
4

I want to second what Centaur_Warchief said: Feminists and women are not the same. We shouldn’t blame all women for the actions of feminists. The video points to how a a lot of the money going to movember doesn’t really go to men’s issues but it’s funded to feminist issues. This is really important to note and sadly it’s not unique to Movember, but applies to many such issues. Great awareness post. We need to be aware of where the money or effort really goes.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 12:07 AM
19

Newsom and some other democrats are acknowledging their party is losing young men, but if one looks at their “solutions”, one quickly sees they don’t actual propose much that will actually help men. Newsom for example proposes men should volunteer more (work for free). He’s actually trying to sell exploiting men more as his solution. As with do many similar articles, this article refuses to acknowledge the discrimination against males that’s at the heart of the problem and therefore at the heart…
/r/MensRights10/11/25 09:34 PM
3

Have a non paywalled link to this story? What I will say is that it’s sad to see so many refer to women who freely choose to go into sex work as trafficked while people (often young males ) who are kidnapped and forced against their will into the drug trade or even as mercenaries goes relatively unacknowledged.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 08:47 PM
53

Exactly. Obama mandated title IX protocols biased towards college men. Trump rolled those back somewhat, only to have Biden reinstate them even more biased than Obama. Republican politicians may not be any great advocate of men’s rights but they’ve proven to be more equal than democrats.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 08:39 PM
239

Young men are moving away from the party that hates them and advocates discrimination against them: Why does anyone seem surprised by this?
/r/MensRights10/11/25 02:10 PM
1

I don’t think the biases against men are due to misandry. They are due to feminist lobbying efforts, to gynocentrism and wanting to win the women’s votes.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 04:36 AM
4

The thing is I pointed out very tangible, specific ways the system discriminates against men. You mentioned things women claim are biased, but are backed by no actual evidence of discrimination against women in healthcare. Just because women complain more, doesn’t mean they are actually treated worse.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 04:03 AM
12

We have something like 5 health agencies just for women, none just for men. Obamacare mandated 20 some women only coverages, no male only coverages. Also under Obamacare, men subsidize women’s health insurance. Yeah, there’s a healthcare gap.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 02:13 AM
10

There’s some women who are sincerely open to discussing issues, but most of my discussions are with feminists in places like this who have no interest in acknowledging facts that don’t suit their agenda. I feel arguing with them isn’t about changing their minds but rather it’s more for open minded people who may read the argument.
/r/MensRights09/11/25 03:55 PM
13

Basically. Listing the truthful arguments they’ve made would be a much shorter endeavor.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 11:57 PM
42

That we live in a patriarchy that oppresses women. That feminism promotes gender equality (when feminist organizations have continually lobbied for and won laws and practices advantaging women over men). That women have less agency than men. That 1:4 college women are raped. That domestic violence is initiated primarily by women (feminist Duluth model) when in fact many studies show women initiate more DV than men. That the gender pay gap compares equal work between men and women (it’s comparing…
/r/MensRights08/11/25 08:43 PM
10

I think he’s saying the odds of the best candidates for all these positions being female is incredibly unlikely. He is discriminating in the basis of sex and I believe freely admitting such.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 11:22 PM
2

It’s not your bad. You are referring to actual privilege. Privilege and advantage are not one and the same. Having more money affords things people with less money can’t afford, but that’s not the same thing as being granted a privilege.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 04:10 PM
8

First, let’s look at what a privilege is: “A privilege is a certain entitlement or immunity granted by the state or another authority to a restricted group, either by birth or on a conditional basis.” (1). So, all the laws we have that advantage women over men such as selective service exemption, AA for women, WEEA, Women owned businesses advantages, healthcare advantages, etc., are female privileges. In contrast what actual advantages are granted to men but withheld from women? If one looks at …
/r/MensRights07/11/25 01:06 PM
11

Equality laws are often ignored or twisted to permit discrimination against men. California has at times upheld non discrimination laws in men’s favor. It also pushed anti-male affirmative consent codes and is one of the states that hasn’t adopted equal presumption of joint custody. It mandates quotas limiting men. I hope California rules in favor of non discrimination in this case, but let’s not pretend it’s been a huge champion of equal rights for men, it hasn’t.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 01:31 AM
7

That’s a great point. If Uber is hiring drivers who are unsafe to passengers that’s poor vetting in their part.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 12:04 AM
12

I think that’s part of what the lawsuit is about.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 10:43 PM
177

Feminism has proven time and time again that it promotes discrimination against men and privilege for women and girls. We’ve reached a point where there’s a backlash against discriminatory identity politics, yet some progressive states are still pushing it to even more ridiculous levels. Perhaps NY deserves what it voted for, but sadly this won’t just impact NY.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 10:01 PM
20

I hope so, but this case is taking place in progressive/feminist California. My fear is a biased judge will rule this discrimination is justified and set a precedent for discrimination rather than against it. Consider how that has happened with Title IX for example.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 09:53 PM
6

Great article. It shows how biased feminist models are that have sadly been adopted by police and our justice system. It also reminds me of a video posted yesterday about men falsely accused of sexual assault and how the justice system was all about trying to convict them rather than seek truth and justice. It’s a sad state of affairs.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 09:49 PM
50

Yeah, people think discrimination against black people is horrible, but advocating the exact same discrimination against men is fine.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 08:43 PM
73

Exactly. Discriminating against men is no different, it’s just more politically correct these days.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 08:22 PM
27

As this documentary points out, false allegations can have very serious consequences to the wrongly accused even if they are found innocent.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 01:19 AM
51

One of the better documentaries I’ve seen posted here. Thanks for sharing. To paraphrase a couple statements from near the end: The goal of the system isn’t to find truth or provide justice, the goal is to find guilt and up the conviction rate.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 12:25 AM
9

Some good observations but sadly like so many such pieces it completely fails to acknowledge the discrimination against boys and men responsible for these changes. Long before Reeves published his book, Dr Hoff Sommers wrote a book chronicling the purposeful discrimination against boys in k-12. Add to that no boys allowed college prep programs, biased title IX mandates, women only scholarships, etc. We advantage women over men in job hiring, in business ownership, in healthcare, in criminal sent…
/r/MensRights05/11/25 09:21 PM
5

Singling out any demographic of the population for special attention and resources makes me cringe, especially when government so discriminates.
/r/MensRights05/11/25 09:08 PM
11

Yeah, and that fits a lot of other woke identity politics as well, but feminism has proven to be especially strong.
/r/MensRights05/11/25 06:37 PM
15

It should just be: Violence Against People. The sex of the perpetrator and victim should have no bearing on the consequences they face, help they receive or deterrents put in place. All people should be equal under the law. It seems we never move beyond justifying discrimination.
/r/MensRights05/11/25 05:23 PM
32

Many studies show women initiate more domestic violence than men do, but when a man does fight back, the woman will probably end up getting the worst of it since men are typically stronger. The thing is however, an individual perpetrator is a perpetrator no matter what their sex is and a victim is a victim no matter what their sex is. Regardless of sex, the odds of dying of DV are incredibly small, far less than dying in an auto accident. Similarly, the vast majority of men will never kill anyon…
/r/MensRights04/11/25 11:11 PM
25

It’s like talking about the boogeyman. And yes, you are right. Such sayings are a way to get someone to accept a false premise. Whether one says they agree or disagree that the patriarchy hurts men too, they’ve already lost the argument because they’ve accepted a false premise. Feminists love to use a false premise, misuse language and employ logic fallacies. Watch out for these tactics.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 05:36 PM
2

Agree. Good added points.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 01:05 AM
41

I think his point that rage is being used to sell and influence is s good one. I agree, It’s helpful for boys and young men to have good male role models, but by claiming a lack of make role models, he’s kind of blaming men (fir not stepping up to be good role models) rather than acknowledging the discrimination against men that’s the bulk of the issue. How can a father be a good role model if biased courts give the mother custody? How can we have good male teacher role models, when schools make…
/r/MensRights03/11/25 08:08 PM
11

There’s a study that shows 2-10% of rape accusations are proven false, feminists of course like to pick the lower range of this spectrum. This can of course be misleading since it’s not the role of our judicial system to prove claims false, it’s the role of our judicial system to try to prove them true and as feminists often point out the vast majority of accusations are never proven to be true (or false). Nobody knows how many of these undecided cases are also false, but certainly enough to rai…
/r/MensRights03/11/25 02:23 PM
34

Go to the Higher Education sub and it will quickly become apparent how strongly academia still supports DEI including discrimination against men. There’s a lot of work to be done to come anywhere near equality and objectivity in academia.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 02:02 PM
9

Well, helping men inconsistent with their goal of privileging women.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:05 AM
16

It’s hard to say how many individual feminists hate men (misandry), but it’s crystal clear that leading feminist organizations have lobbied for and win laws discriminating against men and to this end have released a lot of anti-male disinformation that as fueled the gender war.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 02:49 AM
72

Funny how women soldiers aren’t told to avoid female specific organizations and events in the name of equality.
/r/MensRights02/11/25 03:31 AM
6

Affirmative action advantages women over men in job hiring. WEEA encouraged schools to focus on girls to the detriment of boys. Under Obamacare there are many women only mandates, no make only. Men subsidize women’s healthcare. There are several government agencies to promote women’s health, none to promote men’s. In contrast to acts like the 19th amendment or equal pay act, these laws don’t due irate discrimination, they promote discrimination (against men)
/r/MensRights01/11/25 12:59 PM
24

Men disadvantaged in job hiring by Affirmative action for women. Boys disadvantaged in education under WEEA. Men disadvantaged in healthcare under Obamacare and the many women only healthcare agencies. Biased child custody in many states. Male criminals receiving harsher criminal sentencing. Male owned businesses disadvantaged under women owned business advantages. Only men subject to selective service.
/r/MensRights01/11/25 04:31 AM
37

In the U.S., the Women’s Educational Equity Act actively promoted replacing male teachers with female teachers, knowing full well this would advantage girls.
/r/MensRights01/11/25 03:24 AM
1

The way to stop discrimination is to stop discriminating. Discriminating against men as feminists promote isn’t anti-discriminatory, it just creates more discrimination.
/r/MensRights01/11/25 03:20 AM
6

Many women feel pressure to appear independent, but in reality society is still hypergamous. My girlfriend feels much safer with me around. You can guess which one of us has the skill and confidence to do home maintenance. Most women still want to be financially provided for at least in part. My girlfriend doesn’t buy into feminist B.S., including the idea it’s embarrassing to have a boyfriend. I feel kinda sad for women who do give into such nonsense. It puts their expectations and actual wants…
/r/MensRights31/10/25 10:55 PM
36

It’s quite hypocritical given the feminist movement actively seeks privileges for women and has won many privileges for women over the past half century.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 10:31 PM
14

This of course isn’t an incel sub, but I have no desire to participate in sins that so decide to cancel, censor and otherwise bias information shared. They said, if you want to participate in such subs, simply create another profile.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 04:06 PM
23

Imagine if they said white peoples could select white only drivers. Discriminating against men is accepted in a way almost no other demographic would be.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 04:00 PM
4

France will see the same issue we are already seeing on some U.S. college campuses having similar wording: Women will claim after the fact that while they gave consent, it wasn’t freely given since women don’t have agency and sometimes aren’t empowered to say no.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 02:48 PM
5

The fact we have a lot of healthcare resources for women and not men and women’s better health isn’t a paradox, it’s a causal connection.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 01:53 PM
44

I’d add other MeToo like issues such as the fact asking a woman out can be considered harassment by college policy and by EEOC guidelines.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 12:08 AM
11

Where I have worked for decades, they have been systematically been getting rid of all the men from top positions and replacing them with women.
/r/MensRights29/10/25 05:39 PM
10

Major feminist organizations have been lobbying for and winning legislation advantaging women over men since the 1960s at least.
/r/MensRights29/10/25 02:10 PM
36

I could write several articles just in the false narrative in that article, but I don’t have time. Suffice it to say it’s simply feminist disinformation.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 11:12 PM
2

Well said actually. A hatred of men and discrimination against men aren’t one and the same.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 01:46 PM
12

60 years ago: “We need white only spaces to protect whites from blacks”. Today: “We need female only spaces to protect women from men”. There will always be those who try to justify discrimination against others. We just keep changing whom it’s PC to discriminate against.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 10:06 PM
6

It may not be misandry, but it’s clearly sexist and discriminatory.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 07:39 PM
4

This they aren’t against defrauding men. They generally support paternity fraud. Why do you tnink feminists oppose paternity fraud?
/r/MensRights27/10/25 02:16 PM
-4

Feminists generally aren’t against paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 12:16 AM
19

The last one is essentially arguing against paternity testing on the grounds that discovering a woman is committing paternity fraud or cheating may have shattering implications. Of course it’s not the paternity test that causes this: it’s the act of fraud that causes the relationship issues.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 06:44 PM
33

I’m all for fraud prevention. It’s sad how society overall condones fraud when it’s a man being defrauded by a woman.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 02:25 PM
103

Those who made the boys do this should be fired.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 02:00 PM
6

Women are legally advantaged in many areas of society. Why would healthcare be a magical exemption to this?
/r/MensRights24/10/25 01:19 AM
3

Asking a woman out can result in a college man being accused of harassment. Having sex with a woman can result in facing title IX kangaroo court. Young men aren’t stupid. Of course they are approaching women less.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 05:38 PM
51

The criticism of having a “dad bod” comes almost exclusively from women. My girlfriend never dresses up for me. She dresses up when we go out because she knows she will be judged by other women. Feminists claim men pressure women to look anorexic, yet poll after poll shows men overall don’t like women who look overly twiggy and anorexic. The pressure comes from women, not men. As we see with many gender issues, the reality is often the opposite of the predominant propaganda.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 12:13 AM
3

Many of the laws that disadvantage men and boys, that the men’s rights movement would like to equalize are a result of feminism. One can’t fix the inequality without addressing the cause.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 11:47 PM
5

The issue is that a lot of “rights for women” aren’t rights, but are privileges that advantage women and disadvantage men.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 11:45 PM
2

Feminism has lobbied for and won many laws that discriminate against men. The men’s movement in contrast has not lobbied for laws advantaging men over women. Feminism pushes a mythical patriarchy blaming all men often for made up or over exaggerated issues. The men’s movement doesn’t blame a mythical matriarchy or blame all women, but rather focuses on very real issues such as biased child custody, biased criminal sentencing, etc.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 09:43 PM
7

I think the article has the causality backwards. Identity politics (of which feminism is a branch of) can be traced back to the Frankfurt School. Feminism is a form of woke identity politics, but it didn’t create all identity politics. What we now call woke identity politics was a thing long before women were as strongly privileged and over represented as they are today. Critical race theory for example was a thing before feminism had the power it does today.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 05:02 PM
4

I oppose discrimination. That’s the bottom line. Mainstream feminist organizations (not extreme feminism) have lobbied for and won many laws that discriminate against men and boys.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 03:48 PM
20

Dating a woman who has kids is more complicated. That’s just how it is.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 11:42 PM
138

If a woman sees a naked man through an open window or door, he’s exposing himself to her. If a man sees a naked woman through an open window or door, he’s a peeping tom.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 09:34 PM
5

For the most part, no. Privileging women is not only unfair but inefficient.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 02:51 PM
23

Harvard has been feminized for decades.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 02:39 PM
71

Hypergamy has been the norm for most societies throughout history. The issue we are running into now is that the many privileges we provide women and other factors make hypergamy unsustainable. Advantaging girls in education means more women graduating college. Advantaging women owned businesses and women in job hiring means women, not men are advantaged in the workforce. To give an example, a doctor husband happily supported a wife nurse who would drop out of the workforce. Now more women go to…
/r/MensRights21/10/25 02:36 PM
15

In some areas of the world, boys are trafficked to fight and die in wars. While some of the people involved in the sex industry are forced against their will, most freely choose to enter the industry and should not be referred to as trafficked IMO.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 07:03 PM
6

We have laws advantaging women yet they don’t even think that’s equal for women.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 12:12 AM
6

DEI is all about promoting discrimination.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 05:54 PM
1

What states don’t allow the morning after pill? What states don’t allow adoption?
/r/MensRights18/10/25 11:09 PM
0

Most mothers dint feel giving birth was a burden. Women who don’t want to raise a child have several means to mortally opt out of parenthood. Men typically have none. It’s ridiculous for women to complain about a lack of reproductive rights, when all the reproductive rights are exclusive to women.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 11:04 PM
0

Women have the right to: The morning after pill. The abortion pill. To have an abortion, if kit in their state, another state. To surrender their newborn child. To give it up for adoption. Which of these rights or what other reproductive rights do men have?
/r/MensRights18/10/25 10:33 PM
67

Gibberish. Women support the left because the left advantages them.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 10:02 PM
21

It’s false. Women know if they are reliably using contraception or not. Women can take the morning after pill. Women can take the abortion pill. Women can get an abortion, if not in their state, some other state. Women can surrender their child. Women can give their child up for adoption. Men get to pay. Women have reproductive rights. Men have reproductive responsibilities.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 07:10 PM
6

Carol Gilligan and the AAUW did biased studies to claim girls were in trouble in education when in reality they were doing just as well as the boys. They used this to win WEEA which caused boys to start falling behind in education.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 04:00 PM
43

I certainly agree that both the left and right have been anti-male. I disagree with him that the left is honest about being anti-male. They aren’t honest, it’s just that their extreme anti-male attitudes make their misandry obvious. Many liberal politicians claim to be pro-male while continuing to push anti-male agenda. Newsom for example recently gave a statement claiming to care about men, but in the same statement showed his anti-male bias. Conservatives have been more of a mixed bag. Certain…
/r/MensRights18/10/25 03:21 PM
14

The Koss propaganda paved the way for biased Title IX mandates that deny accused men due process procedures. This is sadly not unique to Koss. Feminists similarly used disinformation about men/the patriarchy victimizing females in education in business ownership, in healthcare, domestic violence to win anti-male legislation in those areas. (As well as others). It’s basic patriarchy theory, identity politics.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 03:10 PM
13

I either ignore it and stick to the subject or might say “that’s a really done ad hominem”, then get back to the subject. Maybe point out the reason they are using an ad hominem is because they can’t defend their point.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 02:02 PM
7

I’m agreeing. The patriarchy is not only an scapegoat but an impossible one, since it doesn’t actually exist.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 03:42 PM
46

I hope a lot of men apply identifying as female.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 03:39 PM
9

Blaming the patriarchy is like blaming the boogeyman.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 03:38 PM
25

We don’t live in a patriarchy, so it can’t villainize anyone. Yeah, feminism like all identity politics categorizes people as either victims or oppressors based on their demographic characteristics rather than whether they’ve actually been victimized or oppressed anyone. It’s irrational.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 03:33 PM
7

Yep. It’s a correlation fallacy. Men with poor health are less likely to marry. It doesn’t follow that marriage improves men’s health.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 04:06 AM
19

I disagree with feminist pushed affirmative action for women, believing men should not be discriminated against in job hiring. I disagree with feminist pushed WEEA , believing boys should not be discriminated against in education. I disagree with feminist pushed women owned business advantages, believing men should not be discriminated against in business. I disagree with feminist pushed healthcare advantages for women, believing men should not be discriminated against in healthcare. I disagree …
/r/MensRights15/10/25 03:49 AM
26

I hate to think how many women do the same and never get caught, the men they falsely accuse often found guilty.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 03:33 PM
17

What about crimes that disproportionately impact men and boys such as murder and battery? Why only focus on crimes that impact females more? Society should focus on reducing all crime and helping all victims regardless of their sex.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 08:09 AM
13

For most of history, boys and young men weren’t behind in education. A big thing that set them back in the U.S., was the Women’s Educational Equity Act, which did put less emphasis on experiential learning and less activity during the day (which boys in average need more of). However, there were many other changes as well such as increasing the percentage of female teachers, encouraging teachers to focus on girls, etc. Many studies show a grading bias against boys. Add to that there are things l…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 08:32 PM
10

Mixed. On the one hand, if a charity does a better job at raising funds, well then obviously they will have more funding for their cause. That’s the nature of fundraising. What bothers me is funding reflects the gynocentric nature of our society as well as disinformation. The disparities wouldn’t be as great if people had accurate information. What bothers me far more than charity giving however is the enormous gender bias in government spending and services. For example there are several govern…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 07:50 PM
6

I see very few men here buy into it. To the contrary, we see many posts about women getting off easier and many criticizing that practice.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 06:08 PM
99

Manslaughter is the killing of another person through reckless behavior where no harm was intended. Smothering a young child with a pillow and leaving a note to not resuscitate clearly involves intent to do harm. Hopefully the jury will rule this to be the murder it clearly is.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 04:01 PM
14

So the woman reporting him to the police stalked him: she followed him around to several locations. She’s possibly also guilty of making a false police report. By all accounts, including the children, there was no behavior warranting any accusation against this man. The woman should find herself at the police station having to answer to these wrongful actions on her part.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 03:54 PM
-1

I see very few men here buy into it. To the contrary, we see many posts about women getting off easier and many criticizing that practice.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 03:48 PM
159

Dating may be harder than it used to be for Ukrainian women due to the tens of thousands of men who died, but I guarantee it’s even harder for those tens of thousands of men who died….
/r/MensRights10/10/25 10:15 PM
10

It’s easy for a woman who’s already profited from marriage and divorce to a man to say she doesn’t need a man.
/r/MensRights10/10/25 09:07 PM
7

AI can be programmed with biases. It’s largely based on what’s available to read including the mountain of feminist misinformation. As previously stated by someone else: It’s not a truth machine.
/r/MensRights10/10/25 03:21 PM
8

No they don’t. If someone starts getting very misogynistic, they typically get downvoted.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 06:01 PM
13

If you go back two years and the most misogynistic post you can find is someone saying women gaslight, that shows how unhateful this sub is towards the opposite sex compared to feminist subs. A sub open to anyone and everyone is going to get some poor comments. Generally speaking, actual misogynistic comments get down voted and again are relatively rare compared to the feminist subs that constantly spew forth strong misandry, that strongly promote discrimination against men, and spread enormous …
/r/MensRights09/10/25 02:43 PM
35

The article contradicts itself. It starts out claiming discrimination against women but then goes on to admit women choose easier jobs and less hours which of course means less pay. Many studies have shown that the main releasing women earn less is that they work fewer hours, choose less dangerous and less stressful jobs, etc. Studies similarly show that women just out of college out earn men just out of college, clearly showing employers are happy to pay women as much or more than men. The pay …
/r/MensRights09/10/25 02:50 AM
39

Women’s restroom facilities are often bigger, yet somehow its men’s fault that women are slow and not mindful of other women who are waiting.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 02:32 AM
37

I don’t think that’s why men’s mental health needs to be addressed so much as it’s about how media needs to stop pandering to women if they want to see profits. It’s funny how Rotten Tomatoes protected Brie Larson from negative criticism, Marvel recast her anyways only to have her movie flop. I wonder if they will ever learn. Disney also dropped Depp based on false allegations. Such companies deserve to go bankrupt.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 05:36 PM
11

So sad. She was one of the first women to really promote men’s issues. A number of other helpful women followed but as they fade away, it seems no new women are stepping up to the cause, at least not in any meaningful way.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 05:31 PM
10

It will be interesting to see what sentence she gets for attempted murder.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 08:04 PM
15

Yeah, marriage is largely about ensuring a man will provide for a woman, not just while married, but they split. It’s a largely a one/sided contract. If a wife refuses to return to work as promised, there’s not much a husband can do about it. Legally, he has to continue to support her. She can of course also stop having sex, stop doing home chores, etc. The one-sided nature of marriage contracts of course means a wife can leverage that.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 02:18 PM
12

When she actually had to run in a presidential primary, her own party didn’t even want her. As for the last election, when she pretended to switch from being anti-male to pro-male nobody bought it.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 12:35 AM
6

Well, romance novels show what women want: an incredibly handsome, wealthy man with no flaws to sweep her off her feet, provide her a extravagant lifestyle and always pug her desires first. Way more unrealistic than just wanting sex in a relationship.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 06:33 PM
36

Any mother who views her 4-year old child as toxic doesn’t deserve to be a mother.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 01:12 PM
20

Even an equal age retirement means women have more years of funded retirement, funded largely by men. Why should they get even more? The reasons for women retiring early make no sense. Stay at home wives do more home chores. Why on earth does this mean they should retire sooner? We could just as well say men work more, so deserve to retire earlier. Another justification is that women are weaker or more fragile. Again, why does this mean they should retire earlier? They actually live longer.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 02:01 PM
8

Their use of the term “reverse discrimination” is indicative of their bias. Discrimination against men isn’t the reverse of discrimination, it’s just discrimination. While much of the article tries to downplay discrimination against men, the following statement is telling: “I think there may be a misconception that we believe white men cannot experience discrimination,” Lilly said. “This is not the case; our findings demonstrate that many of the white men in our sample struggle with economic pre…
/r/MensRights01/10/25 10:04 PM
4

That’s a great question, but I think much more nuanced than might first appear. A friend of mine often says the pendulum swings: a far enough swing in one direction will at some point result in a swing in the other direction. I think that’s true but there’s numerous variables involved. Why is the U.S. finally beginning to fight woke identity politics, including discrimination against men while other countries that have even more discrimination continue to promote even more discrimination against…
/r/MensRights01/10/25 07:45 PM
14

Based on what I’ve read, I’d put India and Australia above the others. They are very different countries with very different policies of their discrimination making it hard to compare which is worse. I think trying to rank order them is kind is however missing the bigger picture. Australia for example has been one of the worst western, English speaking countries for quite some time, but England is quickly catching up. The U.S. hasn’t been quite as bad as those countries and may actually reduce a…
/r/MensRights01/10/25 06:54 PM
4

Obviously horrific act by this teacher, but also, why was the mother sending her 11-year old boy to spend the night at a woman’s house?
/r/MensRights01/10/25 04:24 PM
73

That’s so ironic. It’s lowering standards for women and putting them in positions they aren’t qualified for that creates safety concerns. Ensuring people meet basic qualifications not only increases their safety but the safety of those they are with.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 03:10 PM
46

I get such a kick out of comments like you mention that completely misrepresent the issue. Promoting equal standards obviously isn’t being afraid of women being equal, to the contrary, it’s promoting gender equality.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 03:03 PM
6

How could anyone think an anti-male movement is an alternative to men’s rights?
/r/MensRights01/10/25 01:25 PM
7

One thing that would have to happen for the men’s movement to become mainstream is society would have to reverse from bring gynocentric to androcentric , and I don’t see that happening anytime in the foreseeable future. I think the backlash we are seeing to identity politics may make it a bit harder for feminist organizations to win more anti-male policies but it won’t make the men’s movement mainstream.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 01:22 PM
6

Modeling
/r/MensRights30/09/25 11:10 PM
22

“The law “establishes harsher penalties for men for minor offences of intimate partner abuse—solely on the basis of being men—justified by the assumption of a patriarchal system that privileges men”.” Acknowledges one form of discrimination against men as well as the obviously flawed justification for the discrimination: basic feminist patriarchy theory nonsense.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 09:22 PM
41

Yea. I think men: Question why they should support women, often to get screwed over in the end. How they can possibly meet the high expectation these women have when women are advantaged in education, advantaged in job hiring, advantaged in business ownership, etc. The feminist goal of advantaging women over men directly contradicts women’s hypergamous desires.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 09:16 PM
63

When it comes to such false allegations, people often focus on the false accuser and how they almost never face any consequences for their action. This is fair, but it misses what I believe is a huge part the problem: Sports leagues, employers, government agencies, schools, etc., are treating men as if guilty based on an unproven accusation alone: they are throwing out the concept of a presumption of innocence and instead presuming guilt, often shattering careers, relationships, etc., in the pro…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 05:56 PM
47

Consider that in most title IX sexual assault cases in the U.S., it’s acknowledged consent was given. The issue is the woman later claiming her consent wasn’t valid. This will absolutely be the same: women will claim they changed their mind after signing the form, claim it wasn’t valid consent, etc.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 02:44 PM
314

What women in this article are essentially saying: I hate being single and having to provide for myself, but I’d rather stay single than be with a man who can’t provide for me and afford me the lifestyle I want. What men are saying: I’d love to be in a relationship, but it’s not worth it if all I’m going bend over backwards to provide for a woman who has unrealistically high expectations. (And then probably get royally screwed over in a divorce).
/r/MensRights30/09/25 02:30 PM
10

Fair is whatever a couple decides is fair and works for them. Is it fair to expect to be supported?: No, of course not. A good friend of mine separated after his wife refused to go back to work, so basically he’s now working to support her very early retirement. I don’t see how anyone can think this is fair.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 01:22 PM
76

It says much when gender equality is considered “men won”
/r/MensRights29/09/25 05:24 PM
18

Personally, I want to see the discrimination against men and boys end. No men’s support group can do that.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 02:44 PM
3

Many studies show women initiate as much or more DV than men. Sorry the facts don’t suit your agenda.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 09:59 PM
8

The article talks about the importance of prostrate screenings. Funny how prostrate screenings are not a mandated coverage under Obamacare like many women’s cancer screenings and are.
/r/MensRights26/09/25 05:38 PM
7

Your last paragraph is especially telling. Paternity fraud is fraud and should be treated as such. It’s disgusting how many courts not only fail to hold women committing this crime accountable but far too often rule the fraud should be allowed to continue. Sure paternity fraud might benefit a child, but that doesn’t justify it. By the same argument if I defraud my employer out of tens of thousands of dollars, it should be allowed to continue if I’m using it to help raise my kids. We need to star…
/r/MensRights26/09/25 04:27 PM
11

Women initiate more domestic violence than men do. Hardly an institution of oppression of women.
/r/MensRights26/09/25 12:32 PM
52

That’s perhaps the worst ad hominem attack I’ve seen here so far. You could at least make some lame attempt to refute the factual examples mentioned.
/r/MensRights26/09/25 01:32 AM
53

Society is gynocentric. Politicians cater to the women’s vote. Feminism is far better at propaganda, has more money, etc. Feminism monopolizes gender discussions in education. Almost every college has women’s studies programs dedicated to indoctrinating students with feminist agenda. Then there’s DEI, etc. There’s much more, but there’s a few notable items for you.
/r/MensRights26/09/25 12:59 AM
81

More men going into some sciences is misogyny, more women going into various fields is choice. I’ve seen feminist claim that more men being used as guinea pigs in the first and most dangerous phases of drug trials is misogyny. Really? Women working less and earning less yet spending more (subsidized by men) is somehow misogyny. How is being subsidized by men hateful? Seems like a nice benefit to me.
/r/MensRights26/09/25 12:52 AM
9

That’s why I said “politically speaking” which is what feminism complains about. Feminists aren’t talking about wives taking a husband’s last name. Their claim regarding patriarchy is that men collectively have power of rule, to women’s disadvantage which is clearly false. Consider how many laws we have legally advantaging women over men. Even to your example, there is nothing in modern western countries which gives a father power of rule over a household. My mom typically got her way in the hom…
/r/MensRights26/09/25 12:40 AM
12

I think the article over complicates the issue. A patriarchy, politically speaking, is a system of rule that excludes women and where typically men use their power of rule to advantage men. We clearly do not live in a patriarchy. Women are not excluded from having a political say. Women not only have equal voting rights, but outnumber male voters. There is no political office that excludes women. Women are free to run for any office they choose. Lobbying is a big way groups have influence over p…
/r/MensRights26/09/25 12:29 AM
9

Yeah, and I imagine this still occurs so often because the majority of female teachers committing such acts still get away with it. The never ending news stories of female teachers committing statutory rape is probably only the tip of the iceberg.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 11:05 PM
29

I think the big question is: Does the 99% incarceration rate for boys vs girls fit the crimes committed? As the OP indicated, females often receive a punishment that gets “suspended”. I don’t think the problem is so much juvenile criminals being confined, but rather a large percent of female criminals getting a get out of jail free card. (Though granted, these facilities clearly seem to have some issues. I’m not denying that).
/r/MensRights25/09/25 07:36 PM
13

That’s a great example of how men’s groups can be effective. They’ve slowly, but surely been winning equal presumption of joint custody laws one state at a time. Thanks for adding that.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 07:05 PM
19

There’s been a war against anything male specific. (While female specific venues are encouraged).
/r/MensRights25/09/25 06:51 PM
27

There are men’s organizations. Some of the problems are: They are fighting an already entrenched, successful and well funded feminist movement. This bird behind the numerous feminist organizations. Consider almost every college has women’s studies programs, pushing feminist agenda. The gynocentric nature of society makes it hard to draw attention to men’s issues. As Cdsams said, even many men buy into the male privilege myth. Politicians wanting the women’s vote, support feminist, anti-male agen…
/r/MensRights25/09/25 04:57 PM
21

The right may not be right, but it’s better than the left for young men. Yes, the right is especially opposed to women equally registering with selective service, but selective service isn’t going away no matter who is in power. Yes, the right tends to favor traditional relationships and marriages more, but that doesn’t mean any man has to follow that path. One is free to seek any kind of relationship they want. The left is actively anti-male. The Obama admin mandated incredibly anti-male title …
/r/MensRights25/09/25 01:24 PM
1

Most discriminatory policies are based on one’s sex, not gender identity.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 11:41 PM
1

Interesting. What I’ve seen more is men who could be married choosing not to in reaction to biased laws and practices.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 09:34 PM
1

Identifying as the opposite sex doesn’t mean one faces the issues the sex they identify as faces. A man identifying as a woman doesn’t make one exempt from selective service and a woman identifying as a man doesn’t make one subject to selective service for example. I personally don’t care what anyone chooses to identify as but most of the discrimination against men is driven by one’s biological or at least legal sex, not their gender identity.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 09:33 PM
2

An example I like to give: When most med school graduates were men, they happily supported a wife who was less educated and had less earning potential, a nurse for example. After favoring girls and women in education for decades, we now have more women than men going to med school, but it doesn’t mean these women want to support a less educated man with lower income potential. These women overall still want to marry up and be supported by someone with higher income potential. The discrimination …
/r/MensRights24/09/25 09:24 PM
6

Yeah, while there have been some instances of title IX being used to stop discriminatory practices against men, overall the system is very biased against men. I also worked in higher ed. I’ve personally seen male staff told that if they file any complaints against women who made false allegations against them, they will be fired. I’ve seen a male employee told that if he publicly released information proving his innocence he would be fired. The college has been sued more than once for expelling …
/r/MensRights24/09/25 08:29 PM
3

Yeah, I think most here can keep the discussion to the topic of the video.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 08:21 PM
3

Respectfully, I think you are taking the term “rights” too seriously. Nobody is claiming anyone has a legal right to a relationship. By men’s rights many people mean practices which negatively impact men, not just legal rights. However if we are going to talk about actual rights under the law, there are of course actual matters of law that impact relationships such as biased divorce laws, biased child custody rulings, title IX, affirmative action for women, women owned business advantages, etc.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 07:57 PM
2

I agree, generally speaking that a secondary claim can appear retaliatory. A title IX adjudicator won’t be looking at that however. She will be looking at the claim a woman makes against you and whether you can defend yourself against that claim. I’m not saying she will automatically be believed. What I’m saying is many title IX officers and many hired adjudicators are biased and that may work against you. (Which is why I recommended doing some research to find out if that’s true or not). If you…
/r/MensRights24/09/25 07:48 PM
16

That video focuses a lot on women’s high expectations and men’s confidence. (Which I don’t disagree with). Yes, women have high expectations, they want to date up, marry up and be provided for. This is nothing new however. Society has long been hypergamous, but the way we discriminate against men in education, in job hiring and in business owners makes this less obtainable. That’s what he’s missing. Similarly, this video neglects to mention how young men these days risk being accused of sexual h…
/r/MensRights24/09/25 07:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter