TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Arakin Archive

View 16 posts and 2,479 comments by Arakin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
103

Arakin/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:51 PM
49

Arakin/r/MensRights06/02/14 07:05 PM
43

Arakin/r/MensRights14/01/14 03:21 PM
26

GeneralArakin/r/MensRights16/06/15 04:10 PM
11

Arakin/r/MensRights26/11/13 08:18 PM
9

Arakin/r/MensRights10/01/16 09:21 PM
5

Arakin/r/MensRights29/10/14 01:13 AM
1

Arakin/r/MensRights25/08/13 06:05 AM
1

Arakin/r/MensRights17/01/14 05:32 AM
0

Arakin/r/MensRights31/03/14 03:18 PM
0

Arakin/r/MensRights17/11/14 07:07 AM
0

Arakin/r/MensRights14/01/14 03:26 PM
0

Arakin/r/MensRights07/02/14 12:50 AM
0

Arakin/r/MensRights26/01/14 04:59 PM
0

Arakin/r/MensRights19/11/13 07:36 PM
0

Arakin/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:58 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,479 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

If what she had done had been done by a man there would be an issue. How about Americans just fucking grow up and stop being prudes and realize it was a fucking joke and no one raped anybody?
/r/MensRights18/03/18 04:29 PM
4

That’s just one insane bitch. Feminists don’t go this far.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 04:24 PM
1

Well there ya go. Twins living together could still be nurture.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 07:09 PM
–

Twins who are raised in the same environment ...?
/r/MensRights04/03/18 04:25 PM
–

We don’t have evidence for homosexuality being genetic just like we don’t have evidence for transgenderism
/r/MensRights03/03/18 06:50 PM
2

I’ve said that about SJWs. No real problems. Privileged. No real war to fight, so they make one.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 06:49 PM
1

Any woman who’s that soft would never make it in politics.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 11:34 PM
1

Nothing is stopping women from becoming politicians. Most of them don’t want to.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 05:49 PM
12

Women: fight for equality and then fight against it.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 06:28 PM
1

Feminists have already realized this and come up with “the patriarchy hurts men too”.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 05:32 PM
7

Again, no surprise to any rational human but still a feminist issue. Sigh
/r/MensRights24/02/18 04:30 PM
18

You might not have been offended. The world would have.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:04 PM
2

Also, “being offended” is entirely subjective.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 07:06 PM
2

Hollllaaaa
/r/MensRights15/01/18 02:44 PM
14

Women HAVE to. Look up the talk between Jordan Peterson and Camille Paglia. He talks about this specifically and how men need smart women to stand up to the other women, because we aren’t socially allowed to
/r/MensRights30/12/17 07:30 PM
13

Basically feminists just make shit up to suit them whenever they please.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 05:56 PM
-4

Uh. No.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 07:53 PM
17

Do you think a mainstream media outlet would ever publish a picture of a vagina about to be physically attacked or damaged?
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:30 PM
23

Where do you see evidence of this being related to privilege in the article? I don't see it. This is about women. Social privilege makes them gossip to their bosses? Give me a break. This is the same reason all female companies collapse and they all hate each other. Women function differently than men and vice versa.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 07:09 PM
5

Eh. Bijou has gotten in trouble her whole life and I'm pretty sure she's been in jail. She's a nut. Her Stern interview is amazing
/r/MensRights13/11/17 07:15 PM
0

Well idk where the hell you grew up. Girls are cunts to guys they don't like
/r/MensRights15/10/17 06:08 PM
0

Did you go to school?...maybe you don't get openly shamed at a bar but with girls who remotely know you? Or are drunk?
/r/MensRights15/10/17 05:48 PM
1

Yeah stop being human and having instincts!
/r/MensRights06/05/17 05:31 PM
2

Hah! I was gonna point out Karen Straughn did a video on this years ago and then I saw it was Honey Badger Radio!
/r/MensRights02/02/17 05:55 PM
2

It's not about the money for artists. I wish people would understand. The money is great but artists are seeking to validate themselves and their ego through their art and helping people or changing the world or simply being relevant and famous. Madonna doesn't want to not be famous and in the public eye. She thinks she is helping change the world for the better
/r/MensRights23/01/17 06:37 PM
–

Just have the dudes start saying they're trans and identify as female. Boom. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 04:38 PM
6

Milo is fucking killing it lately. It just shows you the state of America when you have Republican frat boys carrying in a British self proclaimed faggot on a chariot, chanting his name and taking him out for drinks after he makes jokes about loving black dick
/r/MensRights06/11/16 01:59 AM
0

Came here to post that
/r/MensRights28/10/16 12:41 PM
–

But don't/can't claim sexism or appeal to society's morality in anyway. Want your kid? Fuck you. Can't pay child support? Go to jail. Someone SAYS you raped her? You did. Don't wanna go to war? Too bad. Don't want to be a father? Tough.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 05:38 PM
3

This is always the issue! Sure Emma Sulcowits is a liar, but she brought up an important discussion about a terrible issue!" ......
/r/MensRights07/09/16 05:36 PM
3

Exactly.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 09:16 PM
–

He didn't tweet anything worthy of even a scolding let alone a ban. Welcome to the era of the white knight everybody.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 01:30 PM
–

Idk....the sites down now but my life experience doesn't support this at all. Women are just as sexual as men, if not more, but is expressed differently. I've been in relationships where girls want it five times a day for an hour each time and I just have to tell them that's pretty improbable. Girls are less likely to speak openly about their sexual attractions to men in public and this sort of thing, but the erotic romance novel industry is worth billions of dollars and are covered with picture…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:16 PM
2

And less speeding tickets. Less convictions. Less jail time. Not labeled rapists for being rapists. The list goes on.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:56 PM
26

The best part of this is the boy writing back "I don't care" lol
/r/MensRights22/06/16 06:34 PM
1

I only support this if it leads to the total Abolishment of selective service all together. If not all we did is just fuck over the other 50% of the population
/r/MensRights16/06/16 11:46 AM
–

This is looking better and better for Johnny and worse and worse for Amber. God I pray this backfires on her. Good luck ever getting work again
/r/MensRights30/05/16 03:09 PM
5

PLEASE Upvote this to the top of the thread so we can stop having people ask us WHY we are being so skeptical: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3613134/Amber-Heard-files-domestic-violence-restraining-order-against-Johnny-Deep-submits-photo-showing-large-bruise-face-evidence.html A temporary restraining order is an easy thing to get, proves nothing, and if there WAS evidence of abuse, Johnny would be facing criminal charges, which he is not. The photo pretty much proves he didn't hit her w…
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:41 PM
1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3613134/Amber-Heard-files-domestic-violence-restraining-order-against-Johnny-Deep-submits-photo-showing-large-bruise-face-evidence.html
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:39 PM
1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3613134/Amber-Heard-files-domestic-violence-restraining-order-against-Johnny-Deep-submits-photo-showing-large-bruise-face-evidence.html There's plenty of reasons to doubt her, not only this one.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:38 PM
–

It's not a bruise even:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3613134/Amber-Heard-files-domestic-violence-restraining-order-against-Johnny-Deep-submits-photo-showing-large-bruise-face-evidence.html And how does a hand make a perfectly straight line on your face?
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:38 PM
2

Temporary restraining order has nothing to do with proof of those bruises being from him. If it were, he'd actually already be facing criminal charges etc. A temporary restraining order, especially in CA, is not a hard thing to get, especially if the woman is going nuts and putting on a good act, or if the judge is some kind of idiot.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:36 PM
1

Based on the evidence here, and the fact that she obviously already lied about being hit and when based on her photo on instagram, we have some reasons to doubt yeah.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:35 PM
–

Used to trash hotel rooms = wife beater. rolls eyes
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:35 PM
1

FILING for a restraining order means nothing. In CA especially, most places will grant the order to a woman who asks for one. She's going after his 400 million, not just the money they made while dating. She claimed to have bruises, but the Instagram photo proves otherwise. It's yet another case of a young woman and an older man in Hollywood, who has never complained about him until now, and suddenly she's filing for divorce, claiming he hit her which no one has ever claimed against him before, …
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:31 PM
1

Did I say that? Grow up and stop looking into my words like you're some Feminist hunting for misogyny.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:28 PM
3

This is what I'm saying. How do these men keep making this mistake over and over. And no prenups
/r/MensRights28/05/16 04:14 PM
–

I mean, yeah what a bitch. BUT how could Johnny be so retarded. She's in her 20s. He's in his 50s and not looking his best. She could get any man she wants. She's stunning. And he doesn't get a prenup?....when will men learn?
/r/MensRights28/05/16 03:56 PM
–

Yes. Yes you can. Women in the west are the most legally privileged people to ever live. They have more rights than men at a legal level, and have all the lovely societal benefits such as less prison time, shorter sentencing, less likely to be assaulted, far far far less work place deaths, "don't hit a woman," receive custody something like 85% of the time, etc. etc. etc. that's just off the top of my head with a post from my iPhone while sitting on the throne. It's absolutely quantifiable by lo…
/r/MensRights22/05/16 04:32 PM
–

That's not a generalization: it's the truth?...
/r/MensRights22/05/16 03:59 PM
–

Oh stop it
/r/MensRights19/05/16 07:50 PM
3

Except women in the west don't have it worse than men in basically any measurable metric and definitely not in legal rights
/r/MensRights06/05/16 01:16 PM
–

Well yeah we don't really disagree but I think you are over estimating women's jobs in the actual country economy. Men were always the most menial of jobs and that hasn't changed. Of course women contributed to the house and farm or whatever but they weren't fighting to go off and do men's work, because it sucked ass. Then in the modern century women see "nice" jobs and argue they're suddenly being oppressed cause they can't be handed the jobs they want
/r/MensRights03/05/16 04:49 PM
–

By doing home things and she wasn't always responsible for food you are being very reductive. Women weren't leaving the home to have careers and go to jobs like men were and men were, as they still are, doing all the terrible jobs in society that women have never had to do.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 02:28 PM
10

First off I guess I would ask, is there really nothing you think men don't get the better end of? Absolutely nothing? Even I am not so arrogant to think we are that bad off. Don't get me wrong, I find more disagreeable with feminists than I find agreeable, but tone down the victim complex. Not really. I mean, especially from who? From society? From the law? From Government? Even just at face value men are the majority of the homeless, prison population, are the only ones who have ever been draft…
/r/MensRights02/05/16 09:36 PM
–

No it's not. The Left, not just the regressive, are very quick to call people racists when they disagree with them. The regressive left use it as a tool to shut down dissenting people and events, while the "normal Left" just say it as a reaction. People like Kimmel or Affleck who hear any sort of criticism and label it racist.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 09:27 PM
–

Yes, I agree. I hate this assumption that staying home with the kids is somehow an inferior life choice than going out and making money. This is a very, very modern view. Going to work used to be, and still many times is, a fucking shit life, and staying at home would be way better. Imagine being one of the men in the coal mining towns or the oil towns or a man before the 1900s. All the jobs available sucked ass.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 09:25 PM
–

What points about the West that modern feminists make today do you think we should meet them half way on?
/r/MensRights02/05/16 05:24 PM
–

It's the go to tactic for the left when anyone calls them out.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 05:23 PM
–

Women are also the primary victims of war remember?
/r/MensRights29/04/16 09:47 PM
–

Why should dangerous work be a different discussion? It's a major factor to the wage gap. The reason many men are not going to school in the same numbers is because of the difference between the way men and women learn and because of all the jobs men have to do related to physical labor that always will be there, because they join the service, etc. they also are less inclined to go study sociology, gender studies, women's studies, etc etc
/r/MensRights29/04/16 05:51 PM
0

I notice you skipped over my female on male examples just so you could go on a tangent.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:41 PM
–

That's not even remotely what I said. How do you prove rape if it has nothing to do with her consent? That's what you're saying
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:52 AM
3

Did you read his statement? How do you know that's exactly what happened anyway? She's saying she is fine with what happened.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 11:59 PM
–

You said it. Consent is a state of mind. Consent isn't a concrete thing. And yes. It's up to the person not you
/r/MensRights27/04/16 11:58 PM
–

You know how many times the word "no" is said in consensual sex with people? I've said no to a girl when she wanted to have sex and I was tired and she just went and started sucking my dick and got me in the mood. This isn't rape! If the person who was assaulted decides not to press charges, no charges are pressed. If this girl says she wasn't raped, then she wasn't raped. She continued to have sex with the man and she said it wasn't rape and came out in his defense. Her friend here, and you, ar…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 05:34 PM
3

Dude, this isn't even an isolated incident. Three girls I've matches on tinder have done similar shit and brought up rape or stalking or kidnapping etc. and one girl was a raging man hater who I walked out on. It's insane what's going on
/r/MensRights16/04/16 02:27 PM
2

uh...
/r/MensRights13/04/16 11:00 PM
6

Someone disagreeing with you is not being facile, and the fact that you won't reply to my direct questions to your other bullshit posts just shows who the poor arguer is here, and it's not him.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:47 PM
–

I don't think you understand the definition of facile.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:17 PM
–

Yes. Yes I do. I come from a military family on both sides and have lots of friends in the armed forces in various branches. If you seriously have drank the kool-aid and believe all enlisted men who are in combat enlisted knowing they would go into battle and seriously believe in the cause and want to be there and are "laying down their lives for our freedom," then I suggest you go out into the world and meet some real people and do some research on your own, but if you really need me to lay som…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:10 PM
–

What racism?
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:09 PM
–

I know it is. And he's full of shit.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:05 PM
–

No. It's the Left.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:02 PM
–

They volunteered because it was something they wanted to do, and felt was important. They deserve to be praised - not treated like victims. Uh, bullshit. You have no idea what was in the thoughts and minds of those men who enlisted, nor do you have any idea about how the recruiting process works or how they decide what role a young man is going to be in when he enlists.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:01 PM
–

Dunham's comment is suggest that White Men don't know what it's like to be "under attack" because of their race or gender. Except...yes they do. Ask Eminem. Ask any white guy living in an area populated by more blacks or latinos than whites. Blacks who live in black areas filled with black people primarily don't know what it's like to be 'under attack' by whites either. I don't know what 'under attack' means. You think the blacks who are victims of black on black violence in Baltimore feel 'atta…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:01 PM
–

So if you have equal "oppression" then it's not really female oppression is it?
/r/MensRights08/04/16 05:06 PM
7

She AND her mother admitted under oath that he never did anything inappropriate with her. Then suddenly when she needs to get out of her contract he's a rapist...hmm...
/r/MensRights07/04/16 04:32 PM
1

Uh, no. Lol
/r/MensRights06/04/16 01:28 AM
1

I asked you several times and you avoided the question every time. I don't believe we should put a 13 year old in prison for something like this like we would with a 22 year old.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:56 AM
1

Are you aware we try children under 18 differently than those above 18?
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:47 AM
0

I already asked you if you're aware we try juveniles differently than adults, but you apparently don't know this.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:37 AM
0

You're really not that bright are you?
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:30 AM
0

Right, because everything is linear. You are aware we have this type of sentencing already in the US are you not?
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:59 PM
-1

There's a big mental difference between a 13 year old and an 18+ This is why we have ages of consent too.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:24 PM
1

Because 13 year olds make stupid mistakes, and that's why we don't try them as adults most of the time. You don't fuck a persons life for the rest of their life from age 13 for being retarded. Yes, I am fully aware of what COULD have happened to the man.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 07:37 PM
–

They're 13...
/r/MensRights05/04/16 05:49 PM
–

Ex rot you can't hold the premise that minors should always do jail time because we have this thing called jurisprudence and sentencing in this country and we use it. Not all crimes are created equal and we have people who use discretion when it comes to the law. These girls are young and stupid and had no idea the severity of what they were doing and sending them to jail is absurd.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 03:44 PM
-4

How about not? How about some sense of humanity and realizing these are stupid 13 year olds. The mans name wasn't printed in the article. We need to stop treating children like adults and this is a smart move.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 03:42 PM
2

hypersensitive about her Spanish fucking name. But that's not CA right?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 09:15 PM
1

Good, fuck her.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 09:15 PM
4

Honestly? LOL
/r/MensRights29/03/16 08:12 PM
0

aahah
/r/MensRights29/03/16 08:11 PM
–

Sadly, she's not trolling.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 08:10 PM
4

LOL where are these assumptions about him coming from? Jesus.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 06:54 PM
–

Nothing wrong w/how this dude behaved.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 06:30 PM
2

Lol exactly
/r/MensRights26/03/16 07:20 PM
–

More like "even 1 rape is too many."
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:57 PM
–

And number of channels on T.V.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:56 PM
–

Lol that's fucking horrible.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:56 PM
3

Yes -- on one hand it IS good to see the administration taking "sexual assault" seriously for both genders. ON THE OTHER HAND This is fucking absurd.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 04:48 AM
1

Thank you
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:26 AM
1

It's just gender discrimination, there are practical actual reasons they do this, not because they hate females or something.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 12:33 AM
2

Yes, but aborting children who are going to be girls is not gender discrimination, especially since the vast vast majority of Feminists see abortion as a right and not killing a human or taking a human life. The reason to have a boy is a cultural one related to dynasty and inheritance and work, not gender superiority, and it's a fetus anyway. You can't compare aborting a female fetus and men being mowed down in wars and having limbs blown off.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 11:48 PM
1

Thanks :)
/r/MensRights16/03/16 05:52 PM
–

It's not that women don't want to do it. Men don't WANT to either, we are simply built for it. When society collapses it is men who rebuild it or men who built it in the first place. We are simply better at those things.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 05:14 PM
3

I have no problems with this. No names were named it's just some random people she felt uncomfortable around and let others no. If other people walked over and felt like she was being stupid, then no harm no fowl. This has zero consequences to anyone.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 10:26 PM
8

"She was mentally ill, suffering from postpartum depression and her husband had been yelling at her all day. Not her fault."
/r/MensRights12/03/16 08:11 AM
–

Yeah. It seems like a bit of a stretch for me as well.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 05:46 AM
13

Not a single one of these fucking claims about Deen has come out with ANY substance of any kind.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 04:41 AM
–

Is the 1/6 stat correct?
/r/MensRights11/03/16 04:02 PM
3

Hmmm, let's not turn this into a "See women can't do anything" thread will we please?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:52 PM
1

Yup
/r/MensRights03/03/16 01:28 PM
1

public incest group sex and public gang rape. I don't think either of those are really very likely. I know girls with rape fantasies shrug There's no bias here.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 04:36 PM
–

You think public group sex either way is more probable? One involves a person consenting to group sex/incest in public, and one involves 5 people all raping a girl in public. 5 people with no apparent worry about being caught doing such a thing in public.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 09:17 PM
–

Exactly. What does "improbable" mean. Because most people don't have public sex? Sure. I'll go with that. Because a woman wouldn't do that? Nope. Not going with that. Because a woman doesn't like group sex? Not buying that either. Using a phrasing like that is dangerous and it's obvious there is an inherent bias there.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:31 PM
–

This sub is NOT guilty of this bias. What a load of shit. This subreddit is filled with people who understand we can't label a man a rapist immediately simply because a woman says so.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:29 PM
1

In the eyes of the law and the public you are innocent until proven guilty and you are simply choosing to believe a person because you want to
/r/MensRights23/02/16 10:18 PM
–

According to you you were insulted. If you can't prove it then we can't just take your word for it. I mean this is basic shit
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:58 PM
–

That's not absurd, that's life. In fact, that's how the world works. The absence of something is not proof of anything. If my wife is late coming home is that proof she's been abducted or kidnapped? YOU may know, or think, that something of yours was stolen, but that means absolutely nothing to the rest of us if you can't prove it. You could be lying to us, you could be trying to scam insurance, you could have lost it, moved it and forgotten, or never even owned it in the first place and are jus…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:16 PM
–

Yes. Yes it does, because only YOU say it was stolen.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 06:59 PM
–

It doesn't prove it was stolen. You could have moved it or lost it or be hiding it.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 06:27 PM
5

This has to be a joke.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 06:26 PM
31

The government isn't deciding if you were raped or not. A jury of your peers is deciding whether or not your accusation against another human being in your country with the same rights as you, is legitimate or not.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 04:38 PM
–

They never policed my hair, but I was told to cut my long hair short by being called a girl for the first 14 years of my life. It is an issue, but it's not the biggest men's rights issue when there are so many more important things than high school dress codes.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 07:08 PM
–

What kind of topics? This is a pretty unique story in terms of what I see online everyday, and it's not really a big deal. I had a shit dress code in high school, but it's really not an issue.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 04:05 PM
2

Video is private.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 04:59 AM
0

Kevin has always been a hardcore submissive kinda idjit. It's not really a big surprise. I love the dude, but he always is kinda stupid like shit like this.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:30 PM
0

you have no clue what you're talking about lol
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:00 PM
–

What other evidence is there that means she may be dead other than the lack of her presence?
/r/MensRights05/02/16 07:26 PM
–

Uh, no. Saying my wife is missing therefore that is evidence that she was kidnapped is not evidence.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 07:05 PM
–

Uhm...that's not evidence, it's speculation.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 06:49 PM
3

It isn't JUST Lena though, that's the point. TONS of Feminists are trying to make this happen. Remember the Canadian who almost went to jail? The women milo was arguing with recently They're everywhere
/r/MensRights05/02/16 05:04 PM
–

Yes. Yes it is. Calling for special protections online for only women is a sexist request and a potentially harmful one that can result in more cases like that man in Canada being potentially thrown in jail for what he wrote online, simple disagreement with a feminist.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:10 PM
4

God she is such a fucking horrendous creature. Fuck her and her stupid show. I love that we live in such a stupid society that a girl can get famous for being ugly and out of shape and starring in a show that is just worthless and about sex, and suddenly be meeting senators and presidents and being interviewed on politics and people actually care.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:06 PM
1

They won't say it's not true. They will say something like they do when confronted with real rape statistics like "one rape is more than too many. Do you really want women to be raped?" And if we say they are the most liberated they will say something like "and the fact that women are still subjected to daily sexual harassment stereotypes cat calling and man spreading so tell you all you need to know about how 'free' we are and how bad the women before us had it."
/r/MensRights04/02/16 03:38 PM
2

The problem with this guy's video is yes he does kind of explore all the reasons, but only at a superficial level. For example, he says there is "direct discrimination against women especially mothers." Thomas Sewell brought this up way back in the day and chose to clarify between married and unmarried women: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_sGn6PdmIo It isn't discrimination to be worried about promoting a woman to a high hours/high demand position when she's right around the age of wanting to …
/r/MensRights03/02/16 05:29 PM
2

He clarified a few posts up...
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:46 PM
1

exactly
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:45 PM
4

those bulge checks at :42 and :47 I also have absolutely no problem with their behavior, but yes, we as men would get absolutely shit on.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 04:03 PM
–

If you look around this sub, even a little bit, you will find that men and women commit just about equal amounts of domestic abuse, only men are more likely to injure/kill because of their size and strength. Women are more likely to abuse or kill their children, and so on. Do a bit of digging I don't have the time or inclination to do it all for you, but it's there.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 08:47 PM
–

More counter evidence to feminist logic that men are the only violent ones and it will eventually show how easy they will get off.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 04:13 PM
–

Didn't Milo point out that Lesbian couples were the most violent by far? Yes. Yes he did. Link him this story.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 04:12 PM
2

To answer your point, it certainly matters what level and in what context someone is inciting violence. If I burst into Bingo Night at an old folks' home and ask the residents to help me rough up a buddy outside, am I creating a situation that will likely result in any physical harm to my friend? Of course not. Sort of. This doesn't quite get to the heart of the matter. What did you expect when you went into the old folks home to incite violence against your buddy? You weren't the self aware Red…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 06:03 AM
–

He is explaining the principal and you're arguing the particulars. Calling for violence is calling for violence. Doesn't matter what level. She asked for muscle. What if someone took her up on it emotionally and really hurt him? Like that psycho woman who accused the man of grabbing her breast and shoving him off the ledge onto the ground. Inciting violence is inciting violence and that's what she did.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 03:45 PM
–

My experience is that women have no real understanding of moderation when it comes to violence. Look at a guy who has a brain and has been in some fights, then look at a guy who's never really been in a fight. The guy who's been in some, who knows what it's like to have his ass kicked, or kick someone's ass, generally has some knowledge of restraint. He's the kind of guy who will knock a guy out and not go pound him into a pulp on the ground. He has some understanding of what's going on. Then ta…
/r/MensRights29/01/16 08:04 AM
5

In case you haven't noticed, women pick on the weak just as much as men, and vitriolic women LOVE picking on easy target men.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:57 PM
1

slowly
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:35 PM
1

That's not of all time. Force awakens doesn't count and I'm not gonna explain why again. Hunger games barely counts. Read my other posts for why.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 03:27 PM
–

Riiiight. So you want me to prove something that is your little idea of conjecture, that has been disproven by Hollywood doing plenty of big budget films with female leads that under perform the other films, just because you've got some idea in your head that they just haven't been doing it right yet. And why the fuck would you make BROAD AUDIENCE FILMS with minority casts? Do you think they do this in China or Japan or Korea or any country in the middle east or africa? YOu think China tries to …
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:28 AM
–

Are you young or just naive? I do not go to a movie to see a white man. So? I don't either. What's your point? White men, primarily, are the movie stars whose movies bring in the money. Just look at the figures of the highest grossing films and actors. 23/35 of the highest grossing actors of all time are white men. The audiences in China DO go out for these movies. There's a lot of international business done in China, and you would be surprised at how many white, male, A list celebrities to com…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:10 AM
–

Wow. Dude, how many times are you gonna post the same thing about Cameron? How many teenage girls went to see the James Cameron movie because they LOVED Aliens and Terminator...? And no, Gods of Egypt would NOT have been a better movie with replacing all those actors, because no one WOULD HAVE FINANCED THE MOVIE. Maybe some idiots on Reddit agree with you, but that's not the way these things work. Let me try to explain it to you. Hollywood actors have domestic and international draw to investors…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:04 AM
6

The girls saw the trailer and melted, then saw the movie and went back for more Leo. Were you not in high school when that movie came out? Everyone knows this. Leo became the biggest star on the planet when that movie came out.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:00 AM
7

You're a bit off base here unfortunately. Kristen isn't saying women's movies can't or don't make money -- some do, but the biggest, consistent earners are men. Just look at the imdb top grossing actors of all time. 6/35 are women, and one is Emma Watson, who can't be considered as a star money maker, as she's a cog in the enormous Potter franchise. Performing "well" at the box office is not the issue. The issue is just pure dollars and who makes more. You don't know how many Wonder Woman movies…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:58 AM
–

James Cameron was the other selling point. You didn't go for Kate Winslet.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:40 AM
0

She's awful in Panic Room. Come on.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:40 AM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:39 AM
9

The funny thing is, American Gangster, Straight Out of Compton, Hustle and Flow -- all written/directed by white men.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:39 AM
–

Titanic is not Rose's movie. Sorry. It's Jack's. It's Leo's. The movie played for months and EVERY girl brought her boyfriend. No boys wanted to go see that movie, especially not for Kate Winslet. Girls wanted to bring their boyfriends, and that's what happened. Leo became a mega, mega star after that. Star Wars having a female lead is not in any way an indication of female leads making money. That Star Wars movie was going to make money no matter what, and considering the absolute pile of shit …
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:38 AM
–

She's basically 100% right.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:34 AM
14

Bill Burr, man. He makes jokes like this a lot that nobody wants to hear. Epidemic of gold digging whores is one. He's hilarious.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 04:30 PM
9

This may be crossing the line a bit here, but I'm gonna make a broad general statement and say that women, primarily Western women, see the world in a COMPLETELY different way than men. Men, for the entirety of history, did all the bullshit jobs and still do. The laborers, hunters, builders, miners, etc. etc. etc. And women were content to do the rest. We had societies that were more equal than others for people, more oppressive than others for both sexes, more oppressive for one sex than the ot…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 01:34 AM
–

are men afraid to fight back? Yes. I had a girlfriend who had been abused in previous relationships. I don't know what other peoples' experiences with that here are, but she fell in love with me and she needed to test me. It was part of her emotional scarring. She would do whatever she could to try and get me to hit her, just to prove to herself that all men were abusers and that she shouldn't love me. When I wouldn't, (and she did shit worthy of being beaten to shit) she would only fall in love…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:32 PM
1

Eh. She should lose her job but not be charged. No way in hell she should have anything to do with education.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:27 PM
2

These women might be gay, but I'm gonna actually agree with you here. There definitely are "lesbians" these days, who are just faking it. Some of them actually fake themselves out, which is scary to think about. Girls point these girls out a lot and hate them, and the butchy lesbians hate them even more. I've run into several "lesbians" in my life that were clearly completely afraid of men and had no idea what to do and ended up shacking up with a "girlfriend" and being miserable and never havin…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:21 AM
1

I don't think uncensored would make it any better for this type of video.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 09:32 PM
0

I dunno about all that. Girls think dicks get hard and just stay hard and hard is HARD, and guys know what a clitoris is from sex-ed, but I mean...all this shit has to be learned one on one. A big dick usually is always better -- we don't learn that in sex ed class lol. Most guys aren't gonna hit the cervix, and most girls won't know that's even a thing unless they fuck a guy with a huge cock. All this shit is just learned from experience, but women (mostly Feminists) like to perpetuate this myt…
/r/MensRights25/01/16 09:02 PM
6

Just telling you what she said. lol
/r/MensRights25/01/16 05:21 PM
–

Maybe off topic here, but why is it that it's always gay women doing these "sex informative" videos and books and classes etc. about vaginas and orgasms and all that stuff, acting like the vagina is some oppressed American myth or something? The girl in the video has her own channel and says she's "passionate" about talking about vaginas and sex and whatever. Like, they really feel they're doing some kind of service to people...
/r/MensRights25/01/16 04:27 PM
–

The "actress" in the video, whatever, the girl, explained in her Q&A on her channel that "vaginas are more susceptible to bacterial infections than penises" so she requested the men wear gloves for it.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 04:26 PM
1

Sorry, but aren't they being deliberately sarcastic or something?
/r/MensRights25/01/16 04:07 PM
3

Felt attacked, it's like the new catch all excuse!
/r/MensRights25/01/16 04:04 PM
1

Another Feminist sidestepping questions. "So it's men's fault they are overly represented at the bottom of society? Feminists aren't worried about the bottom of society, just the top." And she just goes on a philosophical rant that relates to nothing. Typical.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 04:50 PM
3

That's fine. You'd just get beat up and arrested.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:05 PM
–

No one here disagrees with you. What I think you need to realize, is no law enforcement will support you, nor will the bystanders.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 09:51 PM
6

Exactly. What kind of punishment would a man have gotten? A tiny cash settlement?
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:52 PM
–

Yes. Yes it is, look at the sentence she got and tell us this would have gone down the same thing with the genders reverse.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 05:04 PM
2

It's not even possible to begin deconstructing this shit show of insanity. She sounds like a college kid who thinks they're smart after they took one philosophy or logic course.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:11 AM
–

"If he is let back no female student will feel safe." LOL! What shit. Even if it was true that he raped her but it wasn't able to be proven, he clearly isn't out mugging girls and dragging them back to his place. You have no reason to feel unsafe, just don't go hang out with him.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 09:26 PM
1

Refuse to split the bill!?
/r/MensRights18/01/16 04:45 PM
0

Can we get some moderation going to delete this "women" posts? This sub can't degenerate into a woman hating place. I'll volunteer to moderate.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 04:38 AM
3

Seriously. You have no idea what you're saying lol.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 01:35 AM
3

You don't even know what the hell you're talking about.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 01:18 AM
3

French and Spanish men still find breasts attractive. We have a country with different laws, which creates different attitudes. Of course French and Spanish men are going to be more desensitized if they frequent those beaches, but not all of them do. The French culture and Spanish cultures have much different attitudes towards sex, and the French have been stereotyped for years as being much more interested in sex, especially in their cinema, than Americans, who are seen as much more prudish and…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 01:15 AM
3

I already made that point about nude beaches and topless beaches. You're telling me Spain and French men don't find breasts sexual or attractive? I've been going on about how men are completely capable of conducting themselves civilly around topless women, and you're acting like I've said something different. Your assertion that tribal societies do not sexualize breasts is also a false one. You should do some research. Certain tribal societies don't place as much emphasis on breasts as modern so…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 01:04 AM
3

Lol. Right. I, like all of the world, "fetishize" breasts. In my last statement I pointed out that men don't sprout boners and chase girls who don't have shirts on, just like at nude beaches all over the world. Clearly able to separate them from porn, and you go off on this unrelated personal tangent just emphasizing my point of how out of touch with the real world you are.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 12:54 AM
3

because why?
/r/MensRights18/01/16 12:23 AM
4

Just because people don't sprout boners and run at girls who don't have shirts on doesn't mean we don't find breasts attractive. Breasts are a sign of sexual maturity and ability to procreate and nurture. We are genetically programmed to find that attractive. Ask men if they'd rather stare at photos of asses and tits than close ups of vaginas, and women if they'd rather look at men's bodies than dick pics and you'll come around.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 12:19 AM
7

No. No they're not, because women want to use these things as an example of a rape culture which they further use to further their agendas that are anti-men's rights. Feminists have even suggested making cat calling a crime, only against men of course. This is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 09:04 PM
1

Also cause balls.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:05 PM
2

“Since you want men to have the same response to female breasts as to male breasts, i.e., no response at all, does that mean that you also want your husband or boyfriend to have no response to your breasts? If your answer is no, then you are simultaneously demanding that men be attracted to your breasts and demanding that they not be attracted to your breasts, which makes no sense. If your answer is yes, then you don’t want your husband or boyfriend to be attracted to your body, which also doesn…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:04 PM
1

A Fetish is abnormal. That's not the same.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:03 PM
2

I'd love for these women to end up living in a world where men didn't sexualize their breasts. See how many girls just instantly lose their careers.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:03 PM
9

she's making a point that while logically she knows that catcalling and harassment are bad she's been socialized to treat them as reflective of her worth and even in some way desire it. Except this is bullshit. Catcalling hardly happens outside of cities, and even then it happens to guys to, and it's more of a lower class thing than a cultural thing. Even IF she was being cat called all the time, society doesn't tell people, anyone, that this is good. Society condemns it really. The only people …
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:59 PM
8

but her argument and point is that our culture has conditioned her to need that constant sense of approval or acknowledgement. Except that is bullshit. It's not a culture that tells women they need to be pretty -- it's biology. It's not culture that tells men they need to be strong -- it's biology. Yes, culture will reinforce this, but culture hasn't given her insecurities about her looks. In fact, TONS of our culture tells women not to care about how they look, and it's very obviously working c…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:55 PM
10

It is, and as many things like this are, tangentially but importantly. Feminists use cat calling as evidence in support of their theory of the US and West living in a rape culture. They see cat calling as an example of the Patriarchy and men feeling entitled to women's bodies. Some Feminists have gone so far as to call it sexual assault, and lead that conversation about consent to be cat called or approached in public to the idea of consent to women's bodies, thus arriving at their original idea…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:53 PM
7

Girls are vicious fucking bullies just like men. They bully differently. Girls are more psychological and scheming and guys just beat your ass.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:49 PM
-1

I think more redpillers are coming here. During the early days of this sub there was a very clear line. We just have to keep downvoting them and policing our content so this sub doesn't degenerate.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:15 PM
-7

We don't want this kind of post here thanks. Go to redpill
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:02 PM
2

It's funny especially when considering the statistics related to domestic violence, how men and women both are just about equally likely to assault one another, only men are stronger and women end up more hurt or killed due to this physical imbalance, yet violence among Lesbian couples is the highest among all couples. So as you said, men are simply better at war, and that's why they are the warriors. I think the biggest changes have to come from the culture acknowledging soldiers as not patriot…
/r/MensRights15/01/16 07:08 PM
-1

Right, cause having Jennifer Lawrence on would be any different to your premise.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 05:53 PM
7

I made a lengthy post elaborating on some of my thoughts as well, but just to piggy back on your post, I think you're right -- less women choose to DO something with their art. This isn't a put down, it's an observation. Just as men are more inclined to take risks, work longer hours, more hazardous jobs, more overtime, etc. men seem more willing to take risks with getting their art out there. Every girl I've met who does art (generalizing here) does it "for me." Doesn't really share too much, ma…
/r/MensRights15/01/16 05:50 PM
4

It's not a history of art it's a history of power? What about someone like Basquiat or Banksy or other graffiti art that began on the streets and turned into art in galleries or even into product lines after that? "For years, kings and queens told us what art was about." What absolute nonsense. Kings and Queens were likely patrons of art, because it was difficult to make a living as an artist when the lower classes were working classes and held very little wealth or currency with which to purcha…
/r/MensRights15/01/16 05:46 PM
1

Do a quick google, it's everywhere. Milo speaks on it as well.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 05:14 PM
2

Lesbian couples are also more violent towards their spouses than hetero couples and male gay couples.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 07:18 AM
8

True, but the issue about workplace deaths etc. is that Feminists have made job equality a social issue and claim to want equal representation for men and women in the "work force," but what they really mean is in the white collar, fun jobs that pay well work force, or the ones that give people power work force. They don't want to be coal miners, oil workers, mechanics, steel workers etc., and since men are physically suited better for those jobs anyway, that's what they end up doing. A lot of m…
/r/MensRights15/01/16 07:17 AM
1

I don't have a problem with men being the majority of deaths in combat, as I believe the military should be primarily men, for a multitude of reasons. What I DO have a problem with, is people, specifically Feminist women, not appreciating this fact of life and going on and on about male privilege, when it's white females in the West as the only group in history to get the vote for nothing. I don't have a problem with men doing all the dangerous jobs either. So long as cranky Feminist women appre…
/r/MensRights15/01/16 07:12 AM
7

College is literally becoming the new Fascist sector of the United States. Not even the least bit sarcastic here. SO glad I'm not in school anymore, fucking places are a joke now.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 08:40 PM
3

Definitely
/r/MensRights12/01/16 04:13 PM
1

Exactly. Thank you.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:30 PM
3

The requirements are not the be all end all of the military. People are unable to hack it all the time and either get busted down or shifted duties or simply can't hack it and need to be discharged. It's happened to multiple people I know, all passed and were enlisted, then had to be discharged for physical reasons. This happens. If a girl can pass the requirements it doesn't mean she's as effective as a man who passed as well. There may be a fitness competition that requires the contestants to …
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:38 AM
1

No go ahead, cause you don't know.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:05 AM
1

Why don't you go ahead and explain to us the "Just like running our food to death over the plains of Africa is 'genetic', we moved past that and have changed. Sorry." analogy. Then we can continue this conversation.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:51 AM
1

As for the other areas they are "less fit," I'm not sure what you mean. They may be better in some ways too, how can we know if we haven't tried. WHAT OTHER WAYS!? Being an infantry soldier on the front lines is about your physicality. If male soldiers enter a house with women and no men present to search for shit it is a major deal in some places, places that we end up getting involved with pretty frequently these days. Women can search other women as well as apartments with no men present. If …
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:50 AM
1

I don't even know how to explain any of this to you. It's honestly like you have no sense of the real world. We don't just create a female army because you think we should give it a try, when it's factually proven, as well as proven in every life example we have, that women are physically inferior to men and less fit in every single category you can come up with. Not only is it a complete and utter waste of everyone's time and money, it's dangerous. This is just you wanting to throw some kind of…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:19 AM
2

Uh, no. Technological increases do not eliminate instinct. Especially within a couple hundred years.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:16 AM
1

What do you mean until we try it? We have had women in combat roles. She spoke on the IDF. Moral and willingless is NOT the biggest factor. How many men do you know who enthusiastically enlisted in the armed forces? I come from a military family on both sides, both grandfathers, my father, and a military town with a huge base. Men don't enlist because they want to. Men enlist cause they weigh the costs and benefits. This is why recruiting centers are set up in poor neighborhoods -- to get boys w…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 02:04 AM
2

Uh, no. That's called technological advances to better hunting methods. Just like we don't sleep I caved anymore doesn't mean we aren't genetically predisposed to live inside and build shelters. If we had evolved into a species that somehow didn't have a desire to eat you might have a beginning of a point.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:41 AM
1

Yeah , son. Naive. Yea, fam.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:30 AM
6

So a woman who passes the military requirements COULD go up against a man who passes the military requirements. I know this because, THEY PASSED THE REQUIRMENTS. No. No she couldn't. The requirements test your body's own effectiveness against the test. I can find a 6'3'' guy who weighs 200 pounds who can't do 5 pullups, but I can find a 5'2'' 110 pound girl who can. They're easier for her. Now get that guy in bootcamp so he can do 5 pullups, and now have them fight each other. They can both do 5…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:55 AM
2

Then you don't know how to read. It's not about boo hoo a woman got hurt, it's about more women getting hurt compared to men and causing a drop in the effectiveness of their unit, the same reason why we don't let weak men into the infantry if they can't hack it. They get hurt, have to be tended to etc. and it harms the unit. Other then that she has no real points. I mean, "women aren't tall enough" are you kidding? Then change the military standard to a larger height. Right. If they can't meet t…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:49 AM
7

It's carrying weapons, it's running with a big ass pack on your shoulder, it's muscular strength. You think this is just like war is an FPS now and you just use a mouse and keyboard? Just because we have guns now doesn't change anything. And we're not talking about bombs and airplanes. We have female pilots. This is about ground troop infantry.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:47 AM
1

That's hard to say, but I can't rule out any potential advantages without any evidence either way. Are you insane? You can't propose a hypothesis without your own evidence. There's PLENTY of evidence against why a male would be a better soldier than a woman, all of them due to physical superiority in every way across the board. More muscle, testosterone, endurance, strength per pound, etc. We have male female sports for a reason. You think there was a woman on this planet who could have fought a…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:46 AM
1

Some will be better, some will be worse. In war you can't just use the best of the best all the time, that is too optimistic Except we can use the betters of the better quite easily... As far as how an all female division would compare to an all male division: who knows? There are advantages and disadvantages. Uh, no. We know. It's the same reason we have male female sports.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:44 AM
5

I know that it happens to men...way to completely miss the point.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:43 AM
5

Right, cause when Boko Haram kidnapped 300 boys or whatever it was there was such an outcry right? And all those twitter campaigns right? ...
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:43 AM
2

It's built into our evolution. It was never a rational choice, it was an evolutionary reaction that matured into a rational understanding. Women, like it or not, are more important than men when it comes to furthering the species/tribe/society as far as reproducing. Sorry.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:42 AM
3

It's genetic. EVERY society in the history of the Earth has protected its women and children and prioritized them over men. Why? Cause 2 men can knock up 200 women. 2 women and 200 men can't do much to propagate.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:41 AM
3

How do you define "good enough" when war isn't a competitive sport with a pre-season and exhibition matches and there's no obvious metrics to compare yourself to the other competitors? You'd be comfortable if we just suddenly swapped all male infantry for a female one and had to fight off an invasion on the ground? You woulda been cool with an all female d-day invasion? We have separate sports, not because social issues, but because men would absolutely shit on women, and the same applies to com…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:40 AM
4

Way to misread that entirely. Lol.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:37 AM
7

It's another way of him saying "i'm fine with___"
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:37 AM
2

It's not about boo hoo women will get hurt, it's about women getting hurt more than men and it affecting the combat effectiveness of their unit.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:37 AM
1

lol fucking idiot
/r/MensRights11/01/16 11:25 PM
3

Lol you're insane. Because of sexism. Lol
/r/MensRights11/01/16 07:35 PM
6

As I went to pay she goes "I can pay for my meal!" As though there was a chance I would have paid, and she still had to prove how strong and independent she was
/r/MensRights11/01/16 06:34 PM
–

She told me that stalking girls is one of those "privilege white male things."
/r/MensRights11/01/16 06:06 PM
3

There's a difference between the government treating men like shit and pretending that women are capable of something they're not.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 06:05 PM
–

Right. Let's just let more extreme bad shit happen to women who will be more obvious targets for the enemy and be less physically equipped to defend themselves because YOU think that it will force the entire human species to re-examine their biologically evolved perception of women as more physically frail than man and more important to the race for reproduction and furthering of the species. Great idea.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 04:46 PM
–

Infantalizing? Seriously? Did you not read the article on all the other points she made? What happens when that all female unit can't get shit done and we spend money on them for no reason? What happens when they are taken prisoner and tortured and raped and IsIS releases videos of them raping them and cutting their tits off? What about the actualities of combat vs the pfts? Realities are realities. Women haven't been front line soldiers since the history of man. There's a reason for that.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 04:33 PM
–

Oh you see them. I ended up on a date with one recently and had to get the check and leave early lol
/r/MensRights11/01/16 04:30 PM
8

Uh no it's not. This isn't anti women this is responding to Lena making charged comments and being a false rape accuser.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 04:03 PM
–

Cart man is hot shit. Kids a genius.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 04:02 PM
1

Of course everyone knows what rape is. If she doesn't say no? When do girls say yes? When the fuck does anyone blatantly ask someone if they want to have sex? That's right. Never. Unless you've been together a while and are casually asking to fuck. I've never been with a girl the first time and asked. Girls aren't into that. And if she is passed out...yeah we know. Guys don't have issues not knowing what rape is. Grow up
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:08 PM
0

Well it IS their responsibility alone. It's certainly not the responsibility of the criminal. It's my responsibility alone to take care of my physical well being against thieves and murderers. Why is it any different with a rapist?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:06 PM
1

No it was terrible fan fiction reboot garbage made by committee and a director too scared to take chances.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:44 PM
0

Exactly. Nothing else to say.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:32 AM
1

Oooh, you do really want to talk, eh? Okay, let's. Of course misogyny exists on this sub. Know why? Cause we don't ban people at the drop of a hat like /r/feminism does. Because it takes a lot for us to silence someone or ban them, because we encourage discussion on this forum rather than simply circle jerking our own beliefs over and over. We consistently distance ourselves from TheRedPill, and don't really associate ourselves with men going their own way, but sometimes there's a cross over fro…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 02:27 AM
0

Cause you see what you want to see.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 01:17 AM
5

get banned
/r/MensRights04/01/16 07:14 PM
11

Right. Like he said, there's very little misogyny here, and what is doesn't get upvoted or supported, and very often gets called out and people discourage it quite heavily here.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 07:31 PM
1

Jesus Christ lmao. These fucking women are seriously insane.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 05:13 PM
4

Right. Even a 11 Year old.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:16 AM
2

Well, Bayonetta is just an example. If every video game was a female lead, if Uncharted was a chick, guys would still play video games.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 09:19 PM
2

Except men don't give a shit. Men play Tomb Raider, and Bayonetta and make their characters girls in many games they're given a chance.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 06:49 PM
2

I was talking about the American industry. But yeah you're right about that. Or squeal like little girls. Yeck
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:28 PM
2

wat
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:15 PM
5

It is actually. The porn industry has basically the same 30 guys, or less, doing all the work, because it's hard (har har) work to do.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:05 PM
2

Not yet anyway. We'll see what happens.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:04 PM
40

EVERY indication that it was acceptable. I mean -- it's so fucking obvious, and then she says how she only does anal with him... He should sue the fuck out of her.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:25 AM
–

If a guy "raped" you, why would you work with him again? yeah...and she does anal willingly with him in that video... holy fuck -- that is UNBELIEVABLE. She even says this is the "second time" and says "No anal except James Deen." Couldn't she be fucking sued for this? It's blatant lying and the evidence is ON CAMERA.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:54 AM
11

Accountable for what? They didn't break any laws.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 09:32 PM
8

It's clearly an obvious law and she's absolutely aware of the law. She cheated on her husband, broke the law. The fuck is she a victim of?
/r/MensRights12/12/15 09:31 PM
–

shrug You know how hard it is to become a working name in the porn industry as a male? How many can you name vs how many women? He also starred in a mainstream (kind of) film with Lindsay Lohan. He's not just a porn actor, he's built a brand for himself and succeeded without being a muscled up body, and he's built a likeable persona in public, being one of the only semi-crossover pornstars besides Ron Jeremy. That is something.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 07:51 AM
19

If she didn't want other people to be assaulted, she should have gone to the police immediately and reported him and then posted the tweet as soon as it happened and removed his videos from her website, which was directly pinned to her twitter account the day she accused him of rape. But no, she sat on this supposed rape claim for however long while he continued working with other people. If she's trying to save other women she is sure doing a fuck off job about it.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 07:49 AM
16

I'm sure he will, he's just probably consulting with a lawyer and people about how to go about it.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 07:48 AM
0

Uh, no. There are no inflated stats about MtF trasngendered people who want to live that way in order to obtain female privilege. Fucking, wild insane conjecture.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 11:59 PM
0

No. You're right. Not all trasngender people cut their dicks off, but most either take hormones to alter their appearance, or get surgery, especially breast implants. A confused kid for 3 months isn't a trans person. They're a cross dresser or a transvesite. Transgender people are MtF people who are transitioning genders, not a man dressing as a woman in public.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 11:49 PM
2

The fact that you think a man would think it would just be a better life as a girl, and decides to just take hormones and get plastic surgery and cut his dick off, is absolute insanity. Ask ANY transgender person and they will say the same.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 11:42 PM
5

I cannot believe that someone would rationally choose to be a transgendered person. People don't do that. It's a body dysmorphia mental condition.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 11:18 PM
2

Same stuff the girl from "guy like me" says in her books and interviews.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 07:09 PM
4

Doesn't matter what you look like as a woman when it comes to violence in public.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 04:23 PM
6

While I wouldn't go so far as to say a man would transition to a female just for female privilege, it is interesting that there seem to be more mtf than ftm transsexuals. I wonder what the reason for that is.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 04:22 PM
7

It's funny isn't it, that rape culture originated as a term to describe the prison environment, as an issue that affected men primarily (with more studies/examples showing female guards actually participating more and more now), was adopted/taken over by Feminists to try and describe the entire country, which ironically has a culture that dismisses female on male rape. Fucking mind boggling how these stupid fucking Feminists are.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 04:32 PM
9

Can we down vote these comments please? This is precisely actual victim blaming/dismissal that Feminists talk about and will discredit the mrm. Be as skeptical as you want case by case, but you can't generalize like that.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 03:41 PM
12

Feminists think they can somehow change our perceptions of beauty through brainwashing. It's not gonna happen. First they don't want tits sexualized because obviously we only like tits because society tells us to, then they want to be able to flaunt their tits/sexuality, but not be called names for doing so. They want to make men attracted to stretch marks and fat and hair and out of shape, while telling us that men who are out of shape and ugly can't get a girl...
/r/MensRights09/12/15 10:18 PM
1

Dumbest analogy ever created.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 10:15 PM
3

No. It means you have agreed to certain things up front, to certain situations, and usually this is all explicitly laid out. If you watch kink.com scenes this is why they have before and after interviews. I'd be interested in seeing the one with the girl with the bottle in her ass (Blue something?) to see what was said. There's always a pre-interview where they say "So okay, hair pulling? - yes - choking? - yes - ass slapping? - love it" and so on, and then they interview them afterwards and ask…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 09:38 PM
2

Well no. Just because you've consented to a porn scene doesn't mean the person can do whatever they want to you. BUT, if it was something you understood going in and signed up for without any kind of safe word, and didn't assert yourself during the scene to stop things or walk away -- that's another story.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 05:11 PM
2

Yeah exactly. Something happened during a fucking porn shoot they didn't like, but didn't say anything during it so it continued to happen, specifically on rough/kink shoots, and now later try to pile on a bandwagon and say he raped them. It's like -- this is why porn girls are in porn, because they're fucking nuts (and guys).
/r/MensRights09/12/15 12:11 AM
4

Problem is, a couple of those stories are talking about things that happened during scenes for rough sex/kink websites...
/r/MensRights08/12/15 10:35 PM
10

Well that one girl Blue talking about a kink scene and pissing on her and stuff -- it's Kink. That's what they do. I'm sue she was informed. Crazier shit has happened to girls and guys on that site than what happened to her.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 10:34 PM
17

Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:00 PM
12

But no one ever says a woman raped a man, always "had sex with" or "coerced" or whatever. Buncha bullshit.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 06:36 PM
–

"had sex with" not raped. SMH
/r/MensRights08/12/15 06:14 PM
1

No country with the power to attempt a Pacific sea invasion would do it, and even if they tried, they'd get blown away before they got halfway through the ocean.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:59 AM
1

Right. With our intelligence and satellites we'd have no idea that China crossed 2k + miles to attack Alaska or Hawaii. EVEN IF someone pulled that off -- why would they? What country in the world would risk blowback from the US by attacking two areas of the country that have zero strategic value with regards to a full invasion of the US? Answer? No one would, because it makes zero sense. This will NEVER happen in the current state of the world, and even if things changed, and China amassed some…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:43 AM
1

Not in this day in age. We'd see them coming a million miles away, bomb their asses back to the stone age. Ez.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:32 AM
1

Right. It's my loss not wanting to move and live in South Korea. Israel can be nice too, but I don't want to live next door to psychopaths, or in a country that's at war close to its borders and hated by all its surrounding neighbors.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:52 AM
1

I would never want to live next to North Korea. Sorry. Just like I wouldn't want to live in Israel.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:26 AM
2

They built a bunch of buildings, many of which are unsafe and fell over, a bunch of buildings that are unsafe, that are in the middle of nowhere and are completely empty. Those things I stated are absolutely true, and the rest about their military is also true, and you ignore all that cause you can't even attempt to argue. I've traveled to 8 different countries several times each.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 11:14 PM
2

They built a bunch of buildings, many of which are unsafe and fell over, a bunch of buildings that are unsafe, that are in the middle of nowhere and are completely empty. If China sent "carriers," ie. the ONE it has, we could defend with any of our 19 that we have. China would never attack us, because they prosper too much off our economy. We buy too much shit from them. If they chose somehow to "invade" us, we would 1) know about it a million years in advance, 2) laugh because they don't have t…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:39 PM
0

There will NOT BE a WW2 sized assault on America, as no one would be able to cross the oceans to get to us.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:34 PM
-1

Rapidly. 1 aircraft carrier compared to our 19. And again, you think they could mount a fucking cross sea invasion? Cross the Pacific and invade us? And actually reach our shores? You're fucking dreaming. And yeah yeah, predictive stats about obesity and American men. Bullshit. We have more than enough people now, and they're all over the world fighting places we don't need/shouldn't be. If we brought them home to defend, or used them as counter attacks overseas, we'd be absolutely fine. We don'…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:23 PM
2

It will potentially pass the US. Our Navy is far superior to every country in the world. China had their FIRST aircraft carrier in 2012. The US has 19. That's the same amount as the rest of the carriers from all the other countries with carriers combined. And we have 3 more coming. This means we could literally naval battle another 15 countries single handedly. Also, I'd love to compare China's tech on their aircraft carrier to ours. And I'm not talking about nuking China, I'm talking about nuki…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:21 PM
1

To INVADE the United States? It's not even a matter of naval power at this point. We have long range capability to make sure no navy gets within a any range of the US. Even then, we have more than enough people enlisted to deal with that, and wouldn't need a draft.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:45 PM
2

So? You think they'd invade the United States? 1st of all, for what purpose? And secondly, we wouldn't even have to have a naval battle, we'd just nuke them as they tried to come over.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:44 PM
0

I mean, I still can't honestly believe that you think a country would just brush off an aggressive act with the threat of violence/force behind it as having brought it on themselves or something and not see it as an act of provocation. If you're Joe, and Tim and Jimmy are buddies, and you're fucking around with Jimmy, and Tim comes to your house and punches you in the face, are you gonna be like "Yeah, I guess you're right" and just let it happen? Treaties and alliances etc. don't determine how …
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:18 PM
1

Far better technology? I mean, come on. And you want to live next to North Korea?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:48 PM
-1

Sanctions are absolutely an act of war. They are an act of force, and the sanctions upon Japan were an act of war. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/07/robert-higgs/sanctions-promote-war/ http://therightscoop.com/rand-paul-america-partly-to-blame-for-pearl-harbor-world-war-ii/ http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/22/opinion/when-sanctions-lead-to-war.html I dunno how you can think of sanctions as some sort of peaceful thing that countries will just put up with.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:47 PM
1

They're basically the one exception, and I'm SURE she wouldn't be talking about Japan being more socially progressive than the United States.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:39 PM
1

How are they going to get that army here?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:39 PM
2

You'd likely like to live in South Korea?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:38 PM
1

Right. MAYBE if the US manages to deteriorate into total and utter chaos, then maybe...but WHO would invade us? European nations? Without Navys? I mean...the simple logistics are basically impossible, even if the US was completely fucked. No one has a navy capable of doing such a thing, and even IF we were all fucked, all it takes is one or two nukes sent into the ocean to get rid of everyone on their way. I mean, forget it.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:31 PM
1

Which Korea? And are you kidding?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:29 PM
-1

Sactions are an act of war. Japan did not have their fucking eye on America prior to that. Japan can't have their EYES on America, because they could never invade America. No one could, least of all a country the size of what, New England?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:23 PM
3

No one. Ever. Will ever be able to invade America, unless we have some sort of apocalyptic event at home.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:22 PM
-3

No war in the history of America, other than the revolutionary war, has been a threat to America. Nor will ANY war ever be, especially these days. Who would invade America? Canada? Please. Mexico? Please. Our Navy is bigger than the next 35 countries in line COMBINED, and any naval force coming across the ocean would be nuked/destroyed the second we saw it coming. It is literally impossible, even if all of Europe decided to try and invade the East Coast, that a single ship/plane would ever reach…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:21 PM
1

When would the US EVER be attacked, and how?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:19 PM
2

We are.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 06:54 PM
6

Right. The majority white countries, white ruled whatever, governed, are the only countries you'd really wanna live, and his point was that places like Sweden, are even MORE majority white than we have here, yet you have Feminists blaming white men for all this shit, then praising countries they see better than the US, which are more white than the US.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 05:58 PM
3

What country, 1st world, would you want to live in, that isn't white, and isn't Japan?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 05:12 PM
–

That's not racist. The 1st world countries are all white, except what -- Japan?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 05:04 PM
1

That's what I said in the next part of my post
/r/MensRights06/12/15 03:47 AM
0

Sweet
/r/MensRights05/12/15 11:24 PM
–

Sigh. While I agree with the sentiment, I also feel the best route to take is to abolish selective service all together. That being said, maybe getting this going will scare Feminists/Liberals so bad (if it gains traction) that they will then abolish SS.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:53 PM
6

I can only imagine what a society completely run and dominated by women would look like.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 07:24 PM
0

Watch this whole thing be a big PR stunt from both of them about rape accusations as a social experiment about who believes what, and then both come out weeks later to discuss their motivations behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 12:04 AM
–

It doesn't mean she's lying. It's not a good assumption to be made, and we shouldn't come off as though that's our assumption as a collective on this board, as people will simply discredit us for having that mentality.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:43 PM
–

I wouldn't go that far and I don't think any of us should. But like any case, I wait for the facts and believe innocent until proven guilty. I also feel like there should be legal ramifications for doing this sort of thing. You can't just go around saying this shit without some kind of case pending or evidence. Otherwise it just seems like slander and libel to me
/r/MensRights30/11/15 08:55 PM
7

James throws her onto the ground, slaps the shit out of her 5-6 times and shoves her face into his crotch between scenes, in front of everyone, and no one does anything?...and no one in her personal life noticed she was beat to shit and told her to report it? And she didn't report him because "she was scared?" Of what exactly? Don Coreleone having her knocked off?
/r/MensRights30/11/15 07:50 PM
3

Honest question: do we have some sort of history in this country of not taking sexual assault claims from women seriously? It's always painted as a widespread problem, but I can't even think of an example where a credible sexual assault accusation wasn't investigated. Feminists like to use cases like Kobe or famous athlete's cases where the lawyer tried to discredit the woman, as an example of widespread common treatment of rape victims.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 11:44 PM
1

but nor is he someone I imagine really needs to gain control through rape due to insecurities elsewhere. I could make a thousand arguments behind the mentality of why a James Deen would rape someone. It has nothing to do with anything. Whether or not you think he has proper motivation to rape her has absolutely nothing to do with it, and in a murder trial you need a lot more than simply motive to convict someone.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 08:02 PM
5

From Stoya's previous essays, she appears as a well-educated woman. So if James Dean did assault and raped her. Why not go to the police and use the proper channels to have justice occur? TONS of SJWS and feminists are "well educated." Let me make something abundantly clear: Well educated, does not mean smart, does not mean you have a good mind or are able to process logical thought, argument, formulate your own ideas, etc. etc. It means you have been well educated. That's it.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 07:47 PM
4

Uh, asking why someone would rape someone is the dumbest thing you could ever say. It has absolutely nothing to do with this issue, any issue, the situation, or anything, and makes everyone on this board look like idiots. The issue isn't WHY, the issue is DID IT HAPPEN. This post is insanely ignorant and detrimental to the real issues for everyone involved.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 07:45 PM
1

"But it was signed under duress! He FORCED me to sign it!"
/r/MensRights27/11/15 10:21 PM
1

Just...utter insanity.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 08:58 PM
4

Honestly, the Feminists like this cannot be appeased -- by anything. They have no clear understanding of the world and why things happen, and thus have no end game. They have no real obvious goal that could ever succeed, as they say "one rape is too many" and would consider that one rape a year a problem with the patriarchy. There is literally NO way to appease any of them, ever, with anything.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 04:26 PM
1

True.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 12:35 AM
11

Nope, not at all. I'll be interested to see how she ends up with all this.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 04:32 PM
2

yeah that's the way to make that happen...
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:00 AM
1

Did you just say this isn't about cat calling? LMAO
/r/MensRights23/11/15 01:39 AM
1

It's Lauren Southern, yo.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 01:36 AM
5

Cause snl is the most liberal show to ever exist
/r/MensRights20/11/15 04:28 PM
1

Right, cause there's only two options - sleep around or be celibate
/r/MensRights18/11/15 06:09 PM
1

Okay, whatever. I'm done discussing this and can't keep going back over things I've already clarified. If you guys think the reasonable course of action to the problems with the legal system is celibacy, then go right ahead.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 05:58 PM
0

You haven't read the rest of my posts where I explain further. I'm no longer going to reply to you because you aren't engaging in a civil discourse.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 04:54 PM
1

You have a false equivalency going on. Men don't have the right to rape. Women have state supported terrorism to be brought against guys. It's not a false equivalency. Feminists BELIEVE we live in a rape culture which trivializes rape and allows men to get off with rape, and they say this constantly. It doesn't matter if they are right or not about the result in the legal system, they BELIEVE they are, and this is what informs their actions. We happen to be right about divorce/false accusations …
/r/MensRights18/11/15 04:53 PM
0

Yes, that's me saying 100% no chance. Read my other posts or stop responding, because you are a troll
/r/MensRights18/11/15 04:34 PM
0

I have not said that. You cannot read.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 04:26 PM
-2

It's amazing on a board where it's acknowledge Feminists are trying to paint all men with the possible rapists brush, that we have people here looking at women as possible false accusers/spermjackers/gold digging divorce planners. i mean -- even when I brought this shit up we have people in here doing essentially victim blaming. This is paralleling exactly what Feminists say about men rapists, only you guys are now saying it about women. I mean, how do you not see the irony here? How many bad re…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 07:18 AM
-1

Lol mmmkokay
/r/MensRights17/11/15 11:27 PM
-2

You seriously have social issues. Get outside and off Reddit.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 11:14 PM
-2

No it's a sensible reply because you're insane and have serious social issues
/r/MensRights17/11/15 11:06 PM
-4

Lol by having a brain
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:50 PM
-1

Rofl so now I'm a feminist?!
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:49 PM
-1

You are fucking insane. Lol
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:39 PM
0

If you are really worried about your girlfriend being on the pill and lying to you, or a girl being on an IUD and it not working, then just use condoms. And know what her stance is on abortion and babies and talk about your options from there, like any rational couple. Yes, lots of men said that. Lots of alcoholics say they're capable of drinking off and on as well, doesn't make me one of them. The fact that you look at every woman as a potential person who is out to fuck you over rather than a …
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:28 PM
0

I don't get girls pregnant. It's really not that hard not to. I also don't call myself an MRA, and am pretty up front with girls about what I think about things, so there wouldn't be anything to "find out" later on. And, yeah. Sometimes relationships don't work out. Sometimes they do. That's life. I'm not scared of Chad Thundercock. Maybe I just won't marry her or live in California. I'm a pretty good judge of people. Not everyone is. If you're not, don't sleep with women or get into relationshi…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:22 PM
-1

Because he's not doing that. He literally said women are devious and will fuck you over.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:20 PM
-1

Right. Thanks for letting me know! and it's *those are
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:14 PM
0

Yes. Yes it does. This is sexist crazy shit.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:14 PM
0

Right, those are the two choices. Get fucked over by a woman, or be celibate. Thanks for letting me know!
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:11 PM
0

You have nothing worth saying here. If we start being associated with weirdos like you that think all women are devious and shouldn't be slept with we will face even more shit than we face now. Please stop spewing this shit.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:07 PM
-1

go to /r/theredpill you wacko
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:05 PM
-1

Lol, Jesus Christ. Way to full retard.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:03 PM
1

Your solution is to be celibate? Yeah, sorry some of us don't want to be celibate and don't believe every single woman is going to accuse of us rape.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 09:58 PM
0

No problem with this.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:24 PM
8

And has the potential to become far stronger. Let's face it, a girl who plays soccer can probably woop the ass of a couch potato, but put that man in the gym and bootcamp and shit and when he's in shape have a rematch and see what happens.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:12 PM
8

I disagree. There are plenty of women out there who can beat me silly in a fight if I was going full force. All men wont out perform all women. That's because you're in shit shape. Firemen aren't. You wouldn't make it as a fireman if plenty of women can beat you silly, so you wouldn't be in this equation.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:12 PM
1

yes, pro create. lol
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:08 PM
1

She says free speech should benefit the majority. I mean...how insane is this girl?
/r/MensRights17/11/15 05:11 PM
1

Seriously, is she a troll? She says "physical chareristics" in another video. I mean -- she honestly seems to have some form of autism or be a major awesome troll. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vZz9o332AU
/r/MensRights17/11/15 04:52 PM
2

Gotta love this comment "organized and RUN. Not RAN. More EGALITARIAN, not EAGLETARIAN. It's SUBSIDIZED, not SUBLIDIZED. " lol
/r/MensRights17/11/15 04:48 PM
1

Hahaha I was trying real hard not to say it but I think you're right. Thanks also hahah
/r/MensRights17/11/15 03:24 PM
1

The fuck is wrong with you? You have some real weird issues, which isn't surprising based on how defensive you are about your relationship with your wife which you feel I'm attacking.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:02 PM
0

These are not gender exclusive activities. When I invite my friends over to watch football I'm supposed to lock my wife in the other room because it's male only? I just don't understand why there is a need to separate. Yes, that's exactly what I suggested you should do. Yes because there is also such thing as toxic feminism. You can literally take any concept to the extreme and make it toxic. You don't understand what people mean by toxic masculinity these days. I also have friends of my own gen…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 10:51 PM
2

This is coming from the person that can't even have a discussion on the internet without telling someone that their marriage is false and their personal relationships are garbage. Again, never said this. Lol. I'm starting to think you have some serious issues and are immensely defensive as I've never said anything like that. Yes and there are plenty of studies to suggest the opposite. You claim "History" and "studies" like it's somehow rock solid proof without logically defending any of your ide…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:53 PM
3

I don't fart around my guy friend or talk about what sex positions they like because that's none of my business and I keep my sex life in the bedroom. No, you're either very young or you have some real social issues, which seems like both are probable at this juncture. You apparently don't know what it's like to have guy friends or participate in guy activities which is why you are so hostile to this. "lack of male bonding, male spaces, male activities, feeling less and less like they understand…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:37 PM
5

So then what did you say? To me it looked like you said "You act differently with members of your own sex" Which I don't Again, how old are you? And of course you do. Maybe YOU don't, but most people do. I'm sure all your girl friends fart around you and talk about shitting and shaving and periods and how they like to have sex, and I'm sure you fart around all your girlfriends and talk openly about what porn you like and talk about your dick or the positions you like to fuck in or what you like …
/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:22 PM
1

How old are you?
/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:01 PM
3

Maybe you do. My friendship isn't gender exclusive. That isn't what I said. People who are close to me all interact the same because I don't act any differently around anyone. Right. Because you know how all those people act when they're not with you. Because you act the EXACT SAME WAY with each of your friends. That's bullshit. You have friends you are closer with than others, friends you'll tell things you won't tell other friends, friends you'll be more comfortable around with certain things …
/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:01 PM
3

I'd bet you money she wouldn't be your best friend like that if she wasn't your girlfriend, especially not when you got yourself a real girlfriend/wife.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:54 PM
4

It's not apparent anything. I'm saying you shouldn't just say "Oh my wife/gf's my best friend" and act like that's good enough. You should have friends. Too many people these days don't. I know tons of couples with no friends and it's just them.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:44 PM
–

*there. And yeah this concept that your best friend should be your wife husband and that's that is a very new one. No one in my parents generation ever speaks like that. You act differently with members of your own sex. My guy friends and I have much different interactions than my gf and I and vice verse. Men need make friends and women need female friends. This new western mentality of your so being your best friend and just shacking up with them and being introverts for the rest of your life i…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:43 PM
4

You can just get some intense backlash if you post something semi-off from what they're used to.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 02:04 AM
4

You don't know he knew that. It also doesn't change anything. Being banned for rational behavior is absurd no matter the motive, and just reinforces our point about the fascist mob mentality of feminism that allows no dissent.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 12:01 AM
–

No, you're right. try /r/twoxchromosomes and you get similar shit
/r/MensRights14/11/15 11:45 PM
7

It actually does, because the 1/5 myth is used against MRAs, the men's rights movement, and against men in general as a method of justifying legislation and safe spaces for only women and anti-men behavior, consent classes, teaching men not to rape, toxic masculinity arguments etc. etc. It also serves as more examples of how we should NOT behave on this sub.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 11:44 PM
–

Welcome to the club! /r/feminism bans everyone who doesn't agree with everything they say. One might call it a safe space.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 11:43 PM
2

The fucking NFL makes their dudes wear big fucking pink hats, how about chicks as a joke put on a fake mustache? Just another excuse to dress up. "Oh, I'm sexy Paul Bunyan!"
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:23 AM
3

LOL I never thought of that that way
/r/MensRights13/11/15 12:14 AM
1

so hasn't she made the film already? is this money for distribution or what?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 07:27 AM
-3

Mens rights are about mens rights, not your personal issues with whether or not you want a girlfriend.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:55 PM
-2

Apparently you think that the armed forces are made up of nothing but infantry. Uh, no. That's why I specified infantry. You are so out of touch with reality, you don't even know that women have been in the armed forces for nearly 100 years in this country. And served with our military long before that. Yes. In 2011 about 15% of the armed forces were women. That's 5 years ago. Prior to that the number continues to fall. No women stormed the beaches at normandy or were in WW1 or were getting dust…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:27 PM
-1

Yeah, and I guess if there were they would all be in the bush, because we don't allow them to use technology.... What the fuck are you talking about? The infantry needs to be male. Even female military members have spoken about this. And until very recently, the idea of even having women in the service as laughable. It's the advent of technology that makes this even a possibility. It isn't even about just pure strength, it's about physical endurance and bodily needs etc. It's about male/female r…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:10 PM
–

This sounds like some redpill or MGTOW stuff. Not /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:42 PM
-2

A large percent of modern war far has absolutely nothing to do with strength. So that excuse has been out of date for the last few decades. Right. There's no troops in the middle east or anything. As you point out, there is no reason to continue to require selective service to be a male only responsibility. I don't agree with selective service in general. Doesn't mean we should impose it on women to be fair, we should remove it.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:39 PM
2

I love this idea. Like somehow men all get together and make decisions for men. Don't you think if men wanted to better situations for themselves we wouldn't have alimony, wouldn't have child support, wouldn't have a draft ever or selective service, wouldn't have affirmative action, wouldn't have etc. etc. etc. It's men in power that make the rules/laws, and it always has been, and they don't make laws for the benefit of their own sex.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:41 PM
1

Partiarchy = Gender Norms. So, to prove patriarchy exists, all you have to do is prove gender norms exist. Gender norms have been extensively researched by psychologists and sociologists, so if you're looking for proof, they're the ones to ask. So according to this theory, every country on earth is a patriarchy. The question really is, why do feminists insist on using a gendered term for something they themselves acknowledge both affects and is created/maintained by both genders relatively equal…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:40 PM
-2

It is patriarchal because it imposes a requirement and responsibility on men that it doesn't impose on women, only for the sake of "it's always been that way". Well....no....the reason men have always fought in was is because men are stronger by miles and you don't want to bring women to the front lines and waste time and money and resources training them feeding them clothing them etc. What reality? That women can serve in the armed forces? Bad news for you buddy, they already do. Yes. And only…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:39 PM
1

Something can be practical and historically about survival and still be patriarchal and damaging He didn't say it wasn't damaging -- you did. He said it wasn't patriarchal. There are, and always have been, ways for women to meaningfully contribute to the war effort. Contributing to the war effort is far fucking different from being out in the trenches or storming the beaches of Normandy or in a fox hole somewhere or dying years later from exposure of agent orange or having your arm blown off and…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:37 PM
0

and is oppressive to both men and women Lol. By definition it's a social system that oppresses everyone, so let's call it a patriarchy. Lmao.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:36 PM
2

okay her
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:19 AM
3

Right, cause the men are already working more hours!
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:01 AM
3

t-2 weeks before the university caves and finds a way to fire him
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:42 AM
5

That was priceless lol
/r/MensRights08/11/15 04:47 AM
18

lol she says him saying "we shouldn't accommodate them" is a direct threat!
/r/MensRights07/11/15 11:27 PM
1

Hahah np :)
/r/MensRights04/11/15 08:23 PM
5

Nah. That isn't why. It's because a chick who is that snarky, like the girl in the article, or obnoxious or out there with her views, is probably a cunt. shrug
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:44 PM
1

We need to make sure we don't attack this girl, or anyone for that matter, so our messages can be taken seriously and assholes don't discredit us.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:07 AM
1

I feel like this girl thought this movie would be a great idea to make and would end up getting a lot of views, because she spends a lot of time online and knows that this is a growing hot topic... And now she's like "Oh, fuck!" She didn't expect this, she's seeing the insane backlash from Feminists and she never expected this to be targeting her and now she doesn't know how to handle it. She looks to me like a girl whose world view is being seriously challenged. She doesn't seem to me like a tw…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:05 AM
1

It is naive. Your idea that we should punish other people unfairly in order to stop punishing others unfairly...and the idea that Feminism is somehow the ruling body in America's legal system is absurd.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:28 PM
10

Seriously lol. Who the fuck says "Do you want to have sex?" unless you've been dating for years and she's like in the middle of writing a paper.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:16 PM
-1

The Feminists are not in control of the legal system, and the idea that we should start fighting to punish women more harshly is the only way to affect change is naive.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 07:58 PM
-1

Lol. It isn't only when a feminist is affected. I'm for fairness under the law, and that doesn't mean holding other people unaffected up to ridiculous punishments or legalities that the people being screwed have to face. It's just like saying because black people were slaves the white people should be slaves too -- no you argue against ending slavery, not making everyone slaves. Why not flip this? Why is it when you, and others, see women being not held to the same ridiculous punishments men rec…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 06:27 PM
-4

The hell is wrong with you? I don't agree with his case either. But just because it's happened to someone before doesn't mean we should fight to have it happen to more people. I would fight against it happening to anyone, not fight to have more Feminists put in prison. Just like I'd fight against the draft, not to have women drafted as well. Fight against injustice, not for equal fucking of everybody.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:56 PM
-6

That's what I was saying. If it were a very specific call to violence that would be different.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:07 PM
1

Yeah, exactly. She should change the name =\
/r/MensRights01/11/15 03:53 PM
1

Even if there weren't women there, it's because until recently, and still recently, there are no fucking women in war because they can't hack it. So yeah, all the atrocities are going to be committed by men
/r/MensRights30/10/15 09:04 PM
6

ONE rape threat online is enough! We must create a safe space for women on the internet who feel threatened and scared for themselves threats of violence... /s
/r/MensRights30/10/15 09:03 PM
15

Good god. Her little story there about motorcycles is so fucking cringe worthy. Having been on dates with Feminist style women before, I can say this is so typical. They flirt like 12 year old girls with stupid insinuations and shit, and very often try to get you into some "let's talk about this but it's all a metaphor for sex" conversation where they are basically screening you as to how you are in bed before they commit to having sex with you. As soon as girls start this shit I gtfo.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 06:09 PM
10

If 20-25% of women were being raped at college there would be no girls going to college lol. I wouldn't go anywhere where I had a 20-25% chance for some awful shit to happen to me
/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:50 PM
3

Close. Not bored, but yeah, a bunch of people looking for a cause, looking for a war, looking for a movement. It's a bunch of kids who grew up, ironically, "privileged" after the 60s revolution and were told they could do anything and be anything by their parents, but had no real concrete interests or real desire to work. Thus they turned their "passion" towards a moral cause they can justify, and when questioned on for their path in live (ie .gender studies/womens studies/rallies/charities/no m…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 04:12 PM
3

I'm speaking for the majority of the people here and what is tolerated for posts and upvoted on this sub. You'd know that if you payed any attention. Calling us anti-women is just trolling and starting trouble and being ignorant.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 11:49 PM
5

We are. We are anti-Feminism for the most part. Kthnxbye.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 11:16 PM
3

The problem with this approach is that the RESULT of the domestic abuse doesn't matter when it comes to tackling the problem. Abuse is abuse, and whether it's slapping your spouse around with a spoon or punching them, or stabbing them to death, the way we approach handling the problem remains the same for all cases, as we can't know what the outcome of specific abuse situations can be.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 10:09 PM
4

Yet ANOTHER example of the actual case being wrong, yet Feminists claiming it is still worth talking about as a larger example of the Patriarchy. see. Mattress Girl
/r/MensRights23/10/15 08:35 PM
3

How many people can get up there with the no true scotsman before they get the fucking picture?
/r/MensRights23/10/15 05:08 PM
1

I have no idea what just happened in that video
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:41 PM
3

The best way to make the gender pay gap go away in Hollywood is pay the actors points on the backend.... HHAAHHAHAHAHAHA! This will NEVVVVER happen. Only the biggest motherfuckers get back end, and unless you get GROSS back end, you will get fucked and make no money.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 06:02 PM
7

Uh, that's not how that works. That's not how any of this works. By that rational we could pay men 1 dollar and all woman 10 cents, but we pay ONE woman 1.10, therefore no wage gap. Go take statistics. p.s. the wage gap is still a myth
/r/MensRights20/10/15 06:01 PM
4

the assumption is that all employers are fair, which is getting to be very nearly true. It isn't about fair -- it's about what you can get away with and what they can. An employer will do their best not to spend too much money, and you will do your best not to work for too little. If you can't come to an agreement, leave. If the employer can't keep employees, they will change. If they can, they won't. Simple. That no one is encouraged to go into different careers because of gender, which is defi…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 06:00 PM
10

How can people STILL put mattress girl in their articles and not just be laughed off the planet.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 01:14 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights16/10/15 09:53 PM
1

People understand when someone is able to consent. During a rape claim, it's impossible to know anything about the situation, just like most rape claims, it just becomes he said she said. If she says, for whatever reason, she was too drunk to consent, or vice versa, it's just another detail that will be impossible to confirm without eye witnesses.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 09:10 PM
2

Uh, no. No they aren't. Think about it actually think about what I'm saying there.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 09:04 PM
1

And they're right. Only mentally handicapped people don't understand consent.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:38 PM
1

Explain to me what it is your point is.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:37 PM
3

Yeah, I mean shit let's hand out breathalizers at parties and have both parties blow to see if they are legally able to fuck one another!
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:26 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:18 PM
6

Sex while drinking gets complicated all over the place. If both are drunk? How drunk is too drunk? There isn't anyone breathalizing people. Was one person blacked out? Passed out? How do we know? Do we have witnesses? What if they are both drunk but only the man is charged with rape? What if they planned on having sex before they both intentionally got drunk? What if that tiny girl is a hard partier and can handle her booze? This ALL comes down to drunk people fucking and again he said/she said …
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:04 PM
1

STEM is tech/engineering. Med is med, and there are plenty of female med students, and the nursing field and medical caregiving fields are dominated by them. Women tend to be less inclined to become doctors. Obviously lawyer is not STEM, and you can substitute encouraged for pressured and my argument still stands.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 06:48 PM
0

Doctor/lawyer is not STEM. I went to a prep school, two different colleges (one top tier) and all my friends went to Brown/Columbia/Harvard/Smith/Northeastern/Bates/Trinity etc. etc. etc. None of them were pressured to go into STEM fields, and I know maybe 3 people from my class who went into STEM, and from the other classes in my school the ratio was about the same. I also took classes at other schools and the only people being pressured to go into STEM fields were Asian kids with strict parent…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 06:02 PM
0

Lol.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 05:57 PM
1

No. No it's not lol. Liberal Arts schools are FILLED with upper-middle class white kids majoring in sociology, foreign language, arts, English, gender/women's studies etc. It is absolutely not the norm.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 04:28 PM
1

You realize I'm generalizing right? Parents do all kindsa things. Parents sexually abuse their children, but it's not the norm.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 04:21 PM
7

Girls are definitely not as encouraged to go into STEM fields- Lol, who the fuck is!? Other than maybe Asian American kids with insanely strict parents.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:23 PM
3

Seriously. I've asked a bunch of girls I know "how would you feel if you were with a guy and he just askes 'hey, would you like to have sex? " and they're all basically like that's weird.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 03:18 PM
1

I did in a post further down. Why don't you elaborate on how men are psychologically less damaged. You made an assertion without any support.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:11 PM
2

Men are just as damaged, they are just less inclined to talk about it or to "allow" themselves to admit they are damaged by it, because no one gives a fuck and will usually just make fun of them.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:30 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:29 PM
4

I recently asked a feminist friend what she meant by the "male privilege" she was always talking about. She explained that the fact that I couldn't see it only proved her point: Haha, the ol' disprove a negative trick.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:43 AM
-5

Uhm...clearly you've not much experience in life. You know sometimes people make decisions AS A COUPLE that influence one person's life -- like "Okay, you give up your job/career and stay home and I will bring home the money and you take care of the children." So let's say Person1 tells Person2 to leave their career and stay home with the kids, they agree etc. and then Person1 goes and cheats and shit and they get divorced. Person2 is just fucked? Ooops? Made a mistake? I guess those marriage vo…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:43 AM
1

The real issue here -- do not be distracted, is that should should BE NO DRAFT.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 04:50 PM
1

Yeah, exactly. That's enough to disprove this stat as it is. But of course Feminists will just say that no one knows the statistic, because rape victims are shamed by society into not talking about it so their parents aren't aware and we have to raise awareness about how 20% of college girls are raped...
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:36 PM
-5

:( Yeah. I'm trying to speak up and make sure we don't end up trying to swing the pendulum to the other extreme in the way movements always end up doing -- in the way Feminism has done. Sure we want equal due process, sentencing etc. but we don't want to start making examples out of females to make up for the injustices men have faced in the past. I'd like to just see some real stepping back and examining the issues, rather than knee jerk reactions.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:17 PM
-1

I know. I don't agree w/that either.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:02 PM
-20

Yes I KNOW what she did. I understand. And six months is enough. What's the point of more? Just because? It does nothing to help the situation at all and will only end up creating some horrible person in the end who is made worse by prison and will end up being a burden to the state or something. Her sentence will discourage more girls from actions like this and there's a chance she will end up being a somewhat decent human later in life. You're just mad because of the historical injustices in t…
/r/MensRights11/10/15 08:36 PM
-26

No I don't forget that. I understand this completely and I am all for adult women receiving harsh penalties and I don't agree with showing the boys faces here. I don't misunderstand any of this and have spoken on the subject several times in other threads. That being said, I stand by my assertion that you don't ruin childrens lives. Teenagers across the board need consideration of their age and this case is no difference. She is 16 and made a mistake, an emotional and fucked up one. But she's no…
/r/MensRights11/10/15 08:19 PM
-45

She's 16. How we handle all juvenile cases needs to be examined. Am I saying what she did was okay? No. But at the same time she is a minor and yes I am aware what would have happened to the boy, but we shouldn't lose all sense of scale here. She is 16. We all make mistakes when we are young. Sometimes we make worse ones and they don't end up staying with us for life. She's been punished. If she ends up doing this again in she will have everyone against he as the girl who cried wolf. She's being…
/r/MensRights11/10/15 07:53 PM
2

Yup
/r/MensRights10/10/15 10:29 PM
1

Men grew up for years without television. Men are/have been the breadwinners, because until recently, all jobs were hard fucking work. No white collar jobs, no tech support, no desk jobs, no managerial jobs, no nothing -- it was construction, building, mining, shipping, soldiering etc. That's just the reality of life. Women took care of the home and the children as they are just as important and women are physically inferior. This is why EVERY SOCIETY TO EVER EXIST has had men as the breadwinner…
/r/MensRights10/10/15 10:02 PM
3

I mean, I seriously think she has mental issues. This is just too insane/extreme for a rational person with irrational beliefs. She seriously must have mental issues.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 07:40 PM
1

Men don't grow up as the bread winnet
/r/MensRights08/10/15 03:07 PM
–

because she's not making ACTUAL THREATS. When does this stop for you?
/r/MensRights08/10/15 05:57 AM
3

There you go. Definitely it's just another anecdote, but your mentality behind this is what people need to hear. Even IF women were experiencing a lot of sexual harassment or whatever in the workplace, people seem to think that men in that workplace are all having a great time with one another and no men ever get hazed or made fun of or picked on etc. in the workplace. If your workplace is the kind of environment where sexual harassment happens, chances are the other people in that environment a…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 09:23 PM
2

So the stories that women themselves tell are not true? Personal anecdotes are not evidence of systematic sexism and bias/prejudice etc. A little adversity? Being blocked from climbing the corporate ladder isnt just "a little adversity". Yet again, more conjecture based on nothing other than the occasional personal anecdote and a misunderstanding of "the corporate ladder." Im talking more about women who are actually denied opportunity to move up when they are the best candidate or are sexually …
/r/MensRights07/10/15 07:18 PM
2

I dunno about that. "Work harder" in terms of what? The hardest work with the longest hours is always done by men. The long intense physical labor. Women are simply not able to keep up.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 07:09 PM
1

Because they were expected to "step up". Truthfully i dont think there is a definite answer to that. I don't know how the fuck you cannot know the answer to that -- because men ARE those roles. That's our species. Just like every other species has gender roles biologically, those are ours. Men are the providers, women are the caregivers. End of story. Those biological instincts and differences will be expressed in society, as they have been in every human culture across the globe since the begin…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 06:19 PM
–

You're on this bandwagon that this is all societal? Let me ask you this then -- in EVERY SINGLE SOCIETY ON EARTH, why is it that men have worked harder, been the soldiers, been the providers, the hunters, the builders, the explorers, the leaders, the patriarchs etc. ? Men and women have different inherent wants and needs, and different inherent sexual value. Women's sexual values in society are higher. They are desirable simply by being. Men's sexual values in society are lower, everywhere, and …
/r/MensRights07/10/15 04:00 PM
4

She said: "I'd like to do it [another film]. But they might swap me out for an 18-year-old Pepper Potts or something." Yeah, that's about right. Look at the Transformers franchise. Lost Megan Fox? Who the fuck cares. Iron Man's success IS Robert Downy Jr. The reality that woman need to get used to is that their sexual value in society is much higher and used more easily to obtain things/get places, but that there's always going to be legions of hot chicks biting at your heels ready to steal your…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 03:30 PM
2

....
/r/MensRights07/10/15 03:27 PM
5

Mentally equal is not the same as what she's saying. "Mentally" equal you are implying iq or smarts or whatever. She's discussing emotional differences, preferences, sensibilities etc. and those things we are all obviously different man vs woman, and this has been shown in early childhood studies, and this sub very much accepts this idea and rejects the Feminist narrative that gender is a societal construct. We understand that men are more likely to seek power/leadership roles, work longer hours…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 03:18 PM
1

It's ridiculous to start policing tweets. If she has a literal threat behind it, like "we will kill all the man at the bank today on 3rd street" then okay, but other than that, policing tweets is absurd, and creates a very scary precedent.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 08:05 PM
1

No. "Hate speech" is very difficult to define, people get in trouble for saying things to specific ethnic groups etc. and in more trouble because of 'hate speech' like 'hate crimes' and that's a bad thing.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 07:56 PM
1

As a side note, I love how Amber Rose fucked things up with Kanye so hard, and is back to being so irrelevant as she was before, that she's now latching on to slut walks and radical Feminism in an attempt to gain some relevance again. She must be an insane psycho.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 07:00 PM
2

What is with these Canadians? They're always the most insane videos.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 06:58 PM
–

Don't be glad she's facing charges. Champion free speech.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 06:57 PM
3

but I also disagree with making twitter posts criminal. Yes
/r/MensRights06/10/15 06:57 PM
5

Stupid. Charging people over shit said on the internet is ridiculous. Unless there is an obvious, physically supported threat -- like saying they are going to bomb a bank or something, you should be able to say whatever you want. We should NOT get on board with policing what people say like Feminists.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 06:56 PM
1

Milo is a boss. I love listening to him.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 11:55 PM
0

Look, the one of her in the plaid on the street is either no or moderate make up, less than most chicks I know wear, and is taken on the street with no extra lighting or anything. It's just her walking down the street, it doesn't matter who took it. You can look at it and see there's been basically no touching up. None of her facial lines have been softened, no loose hairs removed, nothing brushed no her arms or anywhere. It's as close to candid as you're gonna get. The one of her at the the red…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:49 PM
2

Yeah it is actually. Wait until you see the back lash she'll get from Feminists for this.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 05:57 PM
1

So? So nursing is sexist? So carpentry is sexist? So babysitting and waitressing is sexist?
/r/MensRights29/09/15 05:53 PM
1

So? So nursing is sexist? So carpentry is sexist? So babysitting and waitressing is sexist?
/r/MensRights29/09/15 05:52 PM
2

Blah, blah "you don't understand Feminism" typical bullshit. The idea that FEMINISM is the believe in gender equality is bullshit. That's called believing in equality, egalitarianism, and doesn't require FEMININE to be the basis of the word. Original Feminism is dead. It succeeded and it is dead. What FEMINISM IS NOW, is the Fascist, misandry filled, power hungry hate group we know now. And Men's Rights Activists have CONSISTENTLY been the group to try and broach the divide between MRAs and Femi…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 05:51 PM
1

candid as in there's not a professional photo shoot going on. it's a paparazzi photo. relax.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 05:46 PM
11

I'm talking about the candid street photo.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 05:41 PM
–

Lol she's 40? In that plaid dress she looks 24.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 04:18 PM
10

since a long time...they rally about LGBT all the fucking time
/r/MensRights26/09/15 01:14 AM
–

Cause Feminists love to hop in and rally for gay people.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 12:03 AM
3

Word. How the fuck is Lena interviewing a presidential candidate?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:39 PM
1

hahaha great video
/r/MensRights21/09/15 02:47 PM
2

gay means happy right?
/r/MensRights19/09/15 02:48 PM
3

I don't classify myself as anything, I just believe in equality and find the mensrights issues/forums more important and non-toxic.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 02:47 PM
0

lol
/r/MensRights19/09/15 02:28 PM
–

"Only a Sith speaks in absolutes"
/r/MensRights19/09/15 12:06 AM
1

ROFL. They will print anything these days.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 04:30 PM
1

You think people who can go out and get laid are going to be buying sex robots? And what is HEALTHY sexuality? You still haven't explained that to me.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:35 PM
1

There are tons of people who don't leave their house now and just beat off. What do you care if they stay home and fuck a robot instead of jerking off?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:33 PM
2

Again, why?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:28 PM
2

One is more unhealthy than the other? Why is it unhealthy? Are porn videos more unhealthy than playboy? What is "unhealthy" about it?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:25 PM
2

What about a fleshlight? Is that healthy?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 06:54 PM
6

ANYTHING that gives men a sexual outlet other than women pisses women off. Male sex toys are seen as perverted, while the female sex toy industry is massive and totally acceptable. Porn that men watch is seen as derogatory and misogynistic, while "porn for women" is seen as respectful and moral, and anything women are into that is kinky is an "exploration of their sexuality," while men into kinky things are seen as perverts and dangerous.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 06:54 PM
6

A baby cannot decide for himself, so why not let the parents decide? Because it's irreversible bodily mutilation. You can't tell me a parent would knowingly do something to their newborn without his best interest at heart. Parents do a lot of horrendous shit with their child's best interests at heart. That goes for tons of people. I like my circumcised penis and if I'm missing out on something, I'm living in ignorant bliss. I'm sure there are people out there happy being in a wheelchair too. May…
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:46 AM
0

I'm "right in principal" every day when countless people say the wrong thing to me. I don't go blowing my top about shit, especially when it's completely harmless shit.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 03:26 PM
9

God these women are really insane. This is more of that free speech isn't free speech when it's directed at us bullshit.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 02:40 PM
1

They hadn't forged anything. She reached out to him and he replied. That's it. If she really wanted to get somewhere with hard work, she would have just politely said thank you and moved on.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 02:39 PM
3

There's no issue here. They're unrelated people on linkedin. He can say whatever he wants to her.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 02:37 PM
1

Not at all. Circumcision isn't the issue. That's my point. You don't understand the principal. The principal is something being done to you/your body without your consent. Whether or not one person in the world (you), or any number of people in the world don't care if that is done to them is irrelevant. It's the principal that is important. The principal you miss about circumcision is that people believe it's okay and legal to do something to a person without their consent, and if you believe th…
/r/MensRights09/09/15 09:55 PM
1

Let me put it this way: If it's not a big deal for you to have someone following you around every day and writing down every word you say, filming you, and then posting it on the internet and giving it to the NSA etc. then is it not a big deal if the government passes a law saying this is legal and assigning everyone else a person to do that to them? If it's not a big deal for you to be in prison, does that mean everyone should be put in prison even if they are innocent?
/r/MensRights09/09/15 09:13 PM
–

That's not the issue.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 05:15 AM
1

If you live in a system in which those are your options, you use them, you don't protest out of moral grounds and let yourself die. She was discussing how people SHOULD be, and how society SHOULD be. But it isn't. So you work with what you have. It would be stupid to act otherwise. That's like pretending that human beings won't steal from you and never locking your shit up.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 03:30 AM
5

Ever been around children? They make gendered choices from a young age. That being said, no one WANTS to be a garbage collector or a truck driver or a coal miner. They do it because they can get the job done and they're paid. Why would a woman want to do that shit when she can do something else? Feminists only whine about the jobs they WANT, not equal representation in ALL jobs.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 01:05 AM
–

He's a troll. Move along.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 01:03 AM
4

She lived in a system in which she paid into. Why would she deny what she paid for in said system?
/r/MensRights08/09/15 01:03 AM
2

Doesn't have to be.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 03:28 PM
6

Phil does something that most people don't understand...he plays the Devil's Advocate. He knows what Ayn wants to get across, and he intentionally provokes good answers out of her. Sometimes his real feelings come out, but he knows what he's doing.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 03:20 PM
2

"Political lesbians are really crucial, because we were the ones that first said that women should be able to determine their own sexuality.We were the ones that said that all women can be lesbians and that heterosexuality is compulsory under a system of male supremacy." D:
/r/MensRights05/09/15 05:59 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIN5aT0Y17Q
/r/MensRights31/08/15 03:15 PM
1

I mean, you can see where her kind of mindset is when you watch some of her videos like this on challenging the entire notion of parenting and taking care of them responsibly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yx7oSUMD178
/r/MensRights27/08/15 07:06 PM
12

How are we defining the word "allows"? Rape is against the law. Anyone who commits or tries to commit a rape is a criminal It'st he same argument used by the same people who say we 'allow' school shootings to happen.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 06:57 PM
4

It's not even just that. She brings up that defense lawyers will try to discredit the person saying they were raped -- as though that's a strategy exclusively used during rape trials, when that's the strategy most commonly used in an accusatory court case. She brings up more statistics that have been disproven. She brings up conjecture and uses it as though it's some kind of fact. She brings up isolated incidents of bad judges or police as though it's evidence of an overall system. She brings up…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 06:57 PM
2

this
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:01 PM
6

There is no fucking consent here. They don't even understand what consent is. They don't understand anything. They are 11, and they are fucking around figuring things out. How many of us didn't fool around with a girl when we were young trying to understand what the hell was going on? This isn't to say I was banging chicks at 11 and filming it, but THEY ARE 11! There's no 'consent' that comes into play with anything here. The boys can't 'consent' either. It's kids who don't understand the world.…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:01 PM
2

You haven't had a taste yet so you don't know. And virgins usually want their first time to be with someone they care a lot about.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 03:17 PM
3

No, I wouldn't lower my standards, because if you can do that then you never had any in the first place Go on a two year dry spell and move somewhere where there's only 5 chubby women. You'll fuck one of them eventually.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 12:58 AM
1

Well just picture yourself as a guy who can't really get many dates, works long hours, doesn't have a social life, and is horny as fuck. It's not that hard to figure out.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 12:57 AM
7

lol
/r/MensRights22/08/15 09:24 PM
17

Read enough articles and you'll realize that something like that is exactly what some feminists would say, or are already saying and you haven't read it yet.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 07:53 PM
–

"Good. Now men can feel what we women have felt on a daily basis for the entirety of human existence!" /feminism
/r/MensRights22/08/15 04:03 PM
1

Join the club.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 09:49 PM
6

Women can buy condoms and tell men to use them. shrug Men don't even have any other options. And the pill from planned parenthood is like 12 bucks a month.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 09:58 PM
1

why not read the link
/r/MensRights11/08/15 09:58 PM
2

Hah, I always use this argument when discussing fashion and no one knows what to say. Women and gay men run the fashion industry, there's no sexist male pig exploitation going on by horny men.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 04:12 PM
–

God she really needs to stop this, I'm starting to hate her.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:26 AM
2

If we do, everyone go over to voat.co
/r/MensRights06/08/15 05:42 AM
5

What? Christina Hoff Summers? Drivel? ...
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:06 AM
–

Fucking schooled. I love watching Milo perfect his rebuttals as he appears more and more in the media to argue with these idiots.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 03:40 PM
15

hahahahah
/r/MensRights03/08/15 03:35 PM
-7

You're a lawyer. You're not a criminal layer, nor are you an experienced lawyer. It's obvious, and the fact that you don't even understand the full details of those case, or understand the power judges have in sentencing nullifies anything you say as relevant.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 06:08 AM
3

Judge sentences. Used zero jurisprudence. Judge's have more leeway than you think. Stop hopping on the 'no one is accountable' bandwagon.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 06:06 AM
1

This is reminiscent of the whole "No she wasn't raped, but the fact that you guys didn't believe her is symptomatic of rape culture."
/r/MensRights03/08/15 12:47 AM
0

I signed this.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 12:42 AM
5

My answer to your absurd question is clear. You're a troll. Go away.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 12:21 AM
4

You are really stupid. I answered the question. You're trolling. Get lost.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 10:54 PM
3

Of course you don't. I didn't answer it you ignoramus.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 10:43 PM
7

Making excuses for sexual assault. What are you a Feminist? Gonna call me a rape apologist next? What's the diff between two diff people with a take id? Well I'd think a 10 year old looks less like a 17 year old than a 14 year old, and most people don't card their hookups -- sooo....
/r/MensRights01/08/15 07:37 PM
1

Removing one shitty judge could make a big difference to a lot of people...
/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:52 PM
4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America
/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:50 PM
7

Of course there's a difference. Statutory rape laws and ages of consent aren't universally agreed on anywhere. There's a huge difference between a 10 year old and a 14 year old, and a 14 year old and a 17 year old. This is why age of consent varies all over the US and all over the world. By your line in the sand logic, a girl who is 15 and 11 months is unable to consent, but a month later she is. This is why so many stupid cases of a boyfriend and girlfriend a year apart in high school end up in…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:49 PM
2

30! ROFL
/r/MensRights01/08/15 05:10 PM
2

IF you were given options. Most guys don't go around questioning a girl's age in sort of ordinary circumstances. If she looks like she's young, you ask, but most guys aren't going to demand a driver's license before they fuck a girl.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:14 PM
2

Lol of course she's acting. But you wouldn't be able to easily guess her age.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:49 PM
4

Lol. I'm sure. There's always one person that likes to claim they know better, but at the end of the day, girls can fool you quite easily, especially if they lied. If a girl you liked told you she looked young, but she's not, you'd believe her. THIS girl: https://zzzlist.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/littlelupe.jpg?w=450 was doing porno for years looking like a little teenage girl. You're gonna tell me you can tell in her face how old she is?: http://i.imgur.com/KlFjouP.jpg
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:42 PM
6

Lol, yeah #7 is totally obviously 12... /s If no one had asked you do you think she's 12, you would have never guessed 12 if you saw her out on the street. Not in a million years.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:25 PM
2

It can be pretty hard sometimes. Especially once you get older. He's 19, but when I started hitting my late 20s, unless I saw a girl in high school or something, telling the diff between mid teens and early 20s of girls sitting drinking a coffee was pretty tough sometimes.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:24 PM
11

Simply being elderly does not mean you are cognitively impaired.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 08:14 PM
4

"Because people shouldn't assume I'm a woman just because I look like one #nonbinary #genderqueer." LOL. These people actually believe this shit. Good thing they live in a perfectly safe 1st world country where they never had to work hard for a living.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 08:07 PM
2

Why is it not "rape?" How would you solve cases such as this? Do you believe in age of consent?
/r/MensRights31/07/15 08:02 PM
2

People are being general with their descriptions of this. Position of power is actually position of authority, and it applies to statutory rape. Which means they don't want your teachers fucking you, partially due to the idea of holding something over you, but more because when you're young they're worried that their status of authority and any respect it may garner can confuse a younger person and convince them of something they may not normally have consented to.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 07:53 PM
6

Well if they lied about something yes, but if I get someone to buy my shit snowblower for 500 bucks and it's worth 15, is that theft?
/r/MensRights31/07/15 07:51 PM
7

"Nice!"
/r/MensRights31/07/15 07:50 PM
1

Right. aka. you ran out of 'argument' and doing the typical Reddit "You don't know what you're talking about and are weird. I'm right, you're wrong. Bye!" thumbsup again
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:36 PM
10

No. It's not just useless skin. Do some research. Nerve endings. Protection and lubrication of the glans. Keep the glans moisturized. Help penetration during sex.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:03 PM
1

Except, unless he has an immediate medical condition, there's no need to do it when he's older.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:02 PM
1

And yet again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98f3IavuEgQ
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:01 PM
3

Uh, yeah you did.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:00 PM
1

Ah! Word :)
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:56 PM
1

Well it's appearing replied to me, I got a notification for it shrug
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:48 PM
1

Great post -- but you should post this in reply to him not me if you want him to see it :)
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:28 PM
2

Women have ELECTIVE double mastectomies to prevent onset of likely breast cancer. Why would it hurt WAY more than it helped? Why is it any different than circumcision? No breast tissue = no breast cancer. Sounds GREAT to me! thumbsup It's not a TRICKY point. It should be a DECISION. Anti-vaccination is a horrendous comparison as not vaccinating your children poses health threats to OTHERS. Cutting off the tip of your dick or not affects YOU. Yeah, and Obama telling people to stop doing horrific …
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:28 PM
2

Cutting off a piece of a man's penis, possibly leading to medical complications, removing sensitivity and nerves, to possibly prevent issues that can be solved by pulling back your foreskin in the shower? Sure. Why not just give girls double mastectomies to prevent possible breast cancer? The number of cases of phimosis vs. the number of circumcisions is trivial. This is NOT the thing that started circumcision in the first place. Do your research. You clearly have not. No one is defending FGM ei…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:08 PM
2

I didn't make the video. Male circumcision can be used to treat medical conditions, but is not used in that manner in 99% of the cases. It's simply a barbaric tradition most people do simply 'because.' Female genital mutilation to that horrific extent is practiced only in savage countries by crazy tribes or religious nuts, and has absolutely nothing to do with the first world or the second world. The 'benefits' for male circumcision, unless used to treat an obvious medical condition where the fo…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 07:49 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98f3IavuEgQ
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:04 PM
0

And yet again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98f3IavuEgQ
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:03 PM
3

Foregen is working on it.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:03 PM
2

And yet again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98f3IavuEgQ
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:02 PM
2

And yet again, I have to post this to educate people: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98f3IavuEgQ
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:02 PM
4

I love this idea of "end to female genital mutilation in Africa." Africa is a continent the size of NA/SA/Europe combined, and then some -- and it's a CONTINENT, not a country. Even if the world was passionate about this, how do you propose to enforce or regulate FGM in a continent that size comprised exclusively of 3rd world countries, most of which are engaged in some kind of conflict, still contain slavery, corruption, tyrants and crime, or are primitive and live out in the middle of nowhere.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:01 PM
–

I made it!
/r/MensRights29/07/15 03:33 PM
9

and mine
/r/MensRights28/07/15 03:35 PM
8

shoeonhead is great and makes a lot of great points and dismantles Feminism in many ways, and one of the largest things, if not the largest thing, standing in the way of mens rights is Feminism. Thus, why it's here.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 06:04 PM
1

This needs to be posted every single time a circumcision thread comes up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98f3IavuEgQ
/r/MensRights25/07/15 06:53 PM
2

"Our culture" makes me hate it. Stupid woman.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 12:07 AM
6

brass tacks, kid!
/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:44 AM
-2

Eh, who gives a fuck. This shouldn't be posted here, it's more whiney shit like /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:16 AM
3

And that the reverse of her fantasy is awful.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:24 PM
2

Well...kinda makes sense to be upset. They are doing an article to upset people and then ignoring the main group of people it affects. There is a genuine factual documentable issue with prisons and the legal system in regards to men and they choose to ignore it. This isn't us crying about opening doors for women.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:47 PM
–

Be feminist Demand verbal consent for sex, which can still not be proven in a court, but demand it anyway. Find out there's an app to do exactly what you just said you wanted. Get mad, because Feminist.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 08:58 PM
14

God this bitch is insane. I can't stand Laci.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:40 PM
1

I don't think so. They said "Statutory rape is often enjoyed fully by both partners. They both agree it was a great experience and have no regrets. Therefore, all rape is equal to these instances" I think they mean what I said, which is two people consentually having sex in relationships or things like this. We may frown upon a 40 year old and a 16 year old, but it's legal under the law in certain states. When in positions of power and authority like teachers and things like that, different stan…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 08:19 PM
1

There's a million kinds of statutory rape, and depending on where you are sometimes it's ridiculous. We've all heard those stories of a boyfriend and girlfriend, he's 17 she's 16 or something, or they're both 14/15, they have sex, the boyfriend gets convicted of rape. Things like that. Statutory isn't always a clear line.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 06:55 PM
2

I never said any of the things you're implying. Congrats on sucking at understanding an argument, completely missing things I said, and constructing and deconstructing your own strawmen arguments.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 02:15 AM
1

Yes it is. Women attract men, but it's normally men's job to approach them. Men physically thrust their dick into a woman, but the woman has to accept it. No one is being acted upon.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 12:57 AM
2

Pursuing a person is not that simple. This is another one of those bullshit myths that like guys pursue women for the most part. Men may be more outwardly active, required to make the first move etc. but women exist all day to attract men, with make up, pushups, heels, hot outfits etc. That's the goal. Is that not actively pursuing a man? When it comes to sex, there is no acting or receiving party. They are both fucking. Unless it's rape.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 05:24 PM
5

Already can't post in it.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:30 PM
–

There is never an ACTING PARTY. This is more Feminist bullshit. We think of this because we say "I fucked her" and fucked is a transitive verb. If the girl says "I fucked him" and was like on top riding him or something, we're like "Oh, yeah that makes sense!" In reality, TWO PEOPLE FUCK. Both people have to put off the signs, both people have to make out, kiss, undress or undress each other, both people have to get sexually excited, both people have to approve of having sex. So the man does the…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:29 PM
2

Look, there are no hard lines here, and that's the problem with this consent shit. The Left is trying to treat this like it's the principal that sounds; it's not. You can't just say "alcohol was in system. they were unable to consent." Because there are differing degrees of alcohol levels in every person, each person has different tolerances, and as ChaosOpen said, alcohol doesn't suddenly just turn you into a different person. If you get hammered and go do a buncha stupid shit, you're a person …
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:26 PM
2

At a certain point no I don't think you can be held responsible for what you are doing People can be in a black out and you wouldn't even know it. Aside from the realistic holes in your logic such as that one, or the fact that not everyone loses all control when wacked out drunk, there is a very easily observable flaw in this when it comes to the legal system. If you believe " At a certain point no I don't think you can be held responsible for what you are doing" then a person could simply go co…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:20 PM
3

No one here is defending fucking someone who is blacked out.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:17 PM
4

.... /s?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:15 PM
2

[–]Arakin 5 points 9 hours ago T-Minus a week before she's on the News talking about how the tech industry is still a boys club and how having a CEO of Reddit be a female caused a real issue with the user base and being that men are primarily more likely to be outspoken and harass women on the internet, she found the environment very hostile to herself as a female and felt the need to step down and re-evaluate the direction she wants her career to go in. permalinkembedsaveeditdisable inbox repli…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 07:29 AM
1

It's not discrimination it's understanding your business and how to run it.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:54 PM
3

You agree that people should be healthy. Amazing. Pretty sure all three people in that video believe this...
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:53 PM
7

This does speak largely to how people do not understand what insurance is, and overall generally throughout the world how insurance has become perverted and fucked. The woman doesn't understand that if a certain demographic is using more insurance money by more visits, they can't be charged the same thing as the people not using their insurance. She doesn't understand that Viagra is not the same as birth control, as Viagra is fixing a medical issue and birth control is a preventative measure. Th…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:50 PM
1

Just let them do what they want. It doesn't affect the sub since we're all self contained here and it doesn't make the front page. We aren't /r/feminism and shouldn't stoop to their level.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:01 AM
7

That's such a broad statement. She denies what? That man is responsible? Or that the climate is changing? Got a link?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 05:49 PM
-1

Of course it does.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:20 PM
-20

No. Men get paid a lot less.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:16 PM
11

This is how I feel as well. The sentencing for this type of thing needs to be looked at with new eyes, but does need to be equal.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:37 AM
2

You mean a good portion of the undeveloped world. 16 is where most people in 1st world countries draw the line.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:50 PM
1

Hah, it is true though.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 02:59 PM
7

Sort of you are. We still have to sign up for selective service unless you want to 'opt out' of all kinds of shit. What you are saying is important for people to know though. Girlwriteswhat mentioned this in a video too, but more people need to hear it. People have never just been given the vote, and Feminism campaigning for it and getting it was what -- probably the first time people had the vote without giving anything for it?
/r/MensRights28/06/15 02:32 PM
6

Ah, yes but don't you see? Those women are indoctrinated by the Patriarchy! Thus their male intoxicated prejudice is coming through. Those female students can't help the male infused criticism they are throwing at their professors, so we must help everyone.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 02:04 PM
1

Yes it does. Stop bitching like a Feminists for stuff like this. See it as support and move on. Soon MRAs will be crying like SJWs if this keeps up.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 05:39 PM
0

Women face similar "issues" but differently (i.e. "The pink tax"[1] where feminine hygiene products cost women way more because it's painted pink and made "just for women.") Not the same things at all. The gym is providing the exact same service for different prices. An analogy that is better would be the same tub of moisturizer and then determining the price at the register. And no, comments like this don't make MRAs look stupid. Would you criticize this if there was a white price and a black p…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 05:35 PM
4

No, calling people dicks happens all the time 24/7 to anyone and everyone. Twat is considered 'quite offensive.' Everyone says dick and it's cool.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:42 PM
4

No. No it doesn't. A person is never going to be 100% what you want them to be. And this technique, used by others, do discredit one person's thoughts/opinions on one matter by attacking their views on another, is a cheap tactic that only validates that person's beliefs on the subject at hand.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 07:28 PM
6

Most definitely. They ban you for ANYTHING that isn't a fist in the air screaming Feminism.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:22 PM
1

Came to post this.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 03:34 PM
4

right
/r/MensRights20/06/15 05:11 AM
–

No no no the point being made here was that these cases are fucked because boys can't be raped in the eyes of our culture, this is why high school boys being statutorily raped are always mocked or joked about in the media and the rapist is always seen not as a rapist
/r/MensRights20/06/15 12:44 AM
5

Yes, but then you can say how about when women use non verbal communication to invite sex instead of explicitly saying yes like with the affirmative consent laws.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 03:47 PM
0

It's not.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:23 PM
0

While I disagree w/this article, that's hardly proof of anything for either side.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:43 PM
0

True. You won't see me defending Feminism here.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 05:45 PM
–

Modern 'feminism.' Other women fighting for basic rights, these women crying that a certain tattoo artist, who happened to be a guy, wouldn't give them a tattoo, and instead of just finding someone else, have to go online and cry about it and smear the guy.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 05:37 PM
-2

yup
/r/MensRights15/06/15 12:30 AM
0

yup
/r/MensRights15/06/15 12:30 AM
1

Just like all female environments can turn to bitchy backstabbing cuntfests and coed dorms can turn into drama filled bullshit
/r/MensRights14/06/15 09:17 PM
3

lol, someone who has never had female roomates or lived on a co-ed dorm floor
/r/MensRights14/06/15 07:26 PM
2

Is this some kinda joke? Plenty of schools have non co-ed dorms and/or floors.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 07:26 PM
1

My school had one too. Only female dorm, no only male dorm.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 07:25 PM
7

The problem with this idea is that a lot of feminists won't acknowledge that there's a single area where men have it worse than women, even when confronted with the objective facts. That's not the problem with this -- that's the entire point.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 08:28 PM
4

Honestly -- these women are insane I can't even believe such people are able to be in such positions to speak with such a lack of credibility and logic.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 06:29 PM
–

I mean come on, it's blatantly obvious to anyone with a brain who wasn't raised in this new age of "Every ounce of criticism a person experiences ruins their life forever" that the man is on point and the woman has no idea what she is talking about. Feminism claims women are strong, powerful, independent, rational etc. just as men, then claim that women can't take any criticism or fight against any cultural biases that may exist and need structural help through government and special treatment t…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 03:48 PM
5

The same way Israel calls everyone anti-semites if they are critiqued in any way.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 03:08 PM
1

Okay.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 01:08 AM
0

I don't really get what you are trying to say. I don't think your analogy makes sense.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:13 PM
9

If it's a good thing? Why wouldn't it be? The ability to adapt and adjust and overcome is always a good thing.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:43 PM
–

The diff though is that guys are used to this shit, because we interact with women and guys do it too, but we're used to it on a lesser extent. Women aren't used to the idea that staring at a chick too long might lead to that girl coming up and beating your ass. Guys are used to that as well. So the shock for a girl to be a guy would be enormous. The shock of a guy becoming a girl would be quite different, and depending on where you work and who your friends are, the mind games/betrayal/shit tal…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:31 PM
–

Let's be honest. Most men who frequent strip clubs are tools. Maybe once in a while, I personally never go because the clubs are sleazy and filled with losers and a total waste of money, but the sort of point is that strip clubs are filled with guys who are looking for something. If you want to just see naked chicks you watch porn. If you want to get laid you get a hooker. If you have some strange desire and emotional issue you go to a strip club where the girls all pretend to like you.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:21 PM
–

I'd imagine a man living as a woman for 18 months would feel the same. I REALLY doubt it. What would I find so impossible to deal with as a male living as a woman? Men hitting on men? Oh, LORD NO!
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:20 PM
–

I don't think you'd have to have lived as an 'adult' male. Living as a male until you're in your late teens when you transitioned is fine, and would be able to find plenty of passable transwomen who fit that criteria.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:19 PM
1

That nail vid is SO on point it's not even funny.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:21 PM
8

So what? She should be fired for that clip? They did what's right, and if they get more complaints about her she'll be fucked.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 09:02 PM
–

I think we shouldn't get too carried away here. If two women accused a man of abusing them, but didn't show up at court, we would be all over them accusing them of lying. I think more than likely she did this, but it's muddled on both sides and the only reason I really side with the victims, allegedly, is because Hope seems like such a sociopath and speaking seems so rehearsed and disingenuous. I think we should be careful hopping on bandwagons like this before we end up like Feminists defending…
/r/MensRights08/06/15 09:01 PM
2

I wanna know where she got the 4 cameras as well. She obviously put a little money into this I wonder if someone else bankrolled it for her and is behind this. Maybe she has a manager now.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 03:27 PM
3

ROFLMAO
/r/MensRights07/06/15 03:25 PM
1

Jaded? More like completely and utterly fucked. Girl is two steps from insane.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 03:25 PM
5

You can blame Kanye for popularizing Marina Abramovic. She's such a fucking joke.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 04:11 PM
16

A young girl giving the finger to an older man, because a society filled with men in the police force protect her ability to do so.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 02:36 AM
1

yeah they might just die
/r/MensRights06/06/15 02:33 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights06/06/15 02:33 AM
6

no no, the westboro baptist church creates more gays! /s
/r/MensRights06/06/15 02:30 AM
4

No, that's not true. Women who are obviously attempting to frame a man are not the same as women who can't prove something.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 08:30 PM
3

Imagine being a girl who was actually raped and seeing what this crazy cunt is doing.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:22 PM
6

Not to mention most couples do not use condoms after a certain point, and the man has to rely on the fact that the woman is keeping up with her birth control.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:21 PM
2

Getting an Ivy League degree doesn't mean anything in my eyes. I know friends from Ivy's (I meant to a mini-Ivy) who were just face in books 24/7 and were the most awkward, socially inept people you'll ever want to meet, who really KNOW nothing. They might be able to tell you facts they've remembered, but they know absolute shiet about the world, and have been indoctrinated into whatever the basic philosophy at their school is, which these days is blinded radical liberalism.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:19 PM
1

why the hell not?
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:16 PM
2

Phillip Scofield is usually a bit better and more objective. I was disappointed by him here.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:22 PM
2

...so if an inebriated woman has sex with a man, she is sort of like Schrodinger's cat. She exists in a simultaneous state of rape/non rape until she sobers up and decides whether or not she's been raped. AAAAHAHAHAHAH amazing
/r/MensRights03/06/15 04:40 PM
1

Okay. So men can't consent either? So I can just get myself completely trash and go around raping people and it wasn't my fault, because I didn't consent to any of that sex right?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 04:39 PM
2

What an amazing way to sum up what I tell people everyday.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:28 PM
10

this is so motherfucking insane
/r/MensRights31/05/15 03:46 PM
-1

rofl, you watched 5 minutes and came up with that conclusion? Have you even finished high school?
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 06:57 PM
7

Yet Feminist antics and prevalence in the public sphere has increased like 9million%
/r/MensRights29/05/15 10:10 PM
1

Got a mirror? it's down on youtube. I only got 20 minutes in and paused it, returned, says removed by user.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:22 PM
2

You're right, but I start to wonder how things may go in the future with one party saving digital messages and another person not. Or digital photographs etc. I duno. 20 years just scares the shit out of me.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 08:26 PM
1

maybe not convictions, maybe that was a little far, but as more and more legislation gets passed, and more and more Feminist ideology invades the legal system, it wouldn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 08:02 PM
4

You say that now, only there ARE going to be convictions based on accusations, and there will be men who get accused who have currently fine reputations, and are then accused of raping some girl back in college, and their names are destroyed. 20 years is fucking absurd. Girls will be able to accuse whoever they want, drag his name through the mud, and conveniently forget the details because it's been so long. Too bad, the damage is already done to the man's name.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 06:21 PM
1

LOL
/r/MensRights26/05/15 08:02 PM
4

I think this is more of a Japanese cultural issue than a men's rights issue. Japan has some very old traditions that stem from Samurai culture and code of honor, and this is one of them.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:03 AM
–

I love how she extrapolates self defense into "so you're saying it's okay to hit women?" Sounds like the typical reddit argument.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 03:50 AM
0

ROFL I can't wait to see how this goes over at UCONN.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 04:26 PM
3

Can I get a tl;dr please?
/r/MensRights23/05/15 07:09 PM
-4

Lol. Okay, buddy. It's not like we've posted countless Feminists saying "FGM is NOTHING like male circumcision" and defending its 'health benefits'
/r/MensRights23/05/15 05:14 PM
-5

Every Feminist you've talked to is against male circumcision? Lawl. You must have spoken to like 2 Feminists that were semi-rational.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 04:22 PM
1

You can meet people, but you're gonna have to be comfortable putting your pics online, making a detailed profile, and spending a lot of time talking to people and becoming part of the community. It's not really a hook up site like okcupid or something. I have a friend who's on it and tried to get me on there, but it's not just my thing, but that's the basic gist of it all.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 07:43 PM
2

sign up for fetlife.com , son
/r/MensRights22/05/15 07:35 PM
1

There will be a multitude of excuses. Doesn't matter which one they choose. There will be a million, and no one on the T.V. reporting on the movie will say he was raped.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 07:35 PM
0

But it wouldn't, as there is nothing new about it. This is new.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:43 PM
1

Compromised honor!? Lmao!
/r/MensRights22/05/15 03:13 PM
5

Enact that labor. Lmao.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 03:07 PM
41

there will be an influx of jokes going "oh, he got 'raped' by those hot ass girls. wah wah, boo hoo"
/r/MensRights22/05/15 03:05 PM
0

I would love for God (if there was one) to play a big joke on these cunts for a day by just making every white male on the planet vanish and let them watch the world collapse.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 04:21 AM
1

They're not literally insane though. It takes a seriously brainwashed person to ignore the plight of their child in favor of sticking to their beliefs that obviously harm their child or allow them to be sent to prison. I don't believe these extremists are capable of that.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 09:07 PM
-1

Nah. All mothers, unless completely insane, will love their sons too much to see them go through what they will go through as they grow up.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:41 PM
6

Yea, I've read that. Just wait for the deluge that comes in a few years. When I get into debates and arguments with girls who think it's somehow wrong for people to tell girls what precautions to take to avoid getting themselves into wrong circumstances, I always just ask the girl "So you wouldn't tell your daughter how to look out for herself?" And it ALWAYS shuts her up or ends that line of discussion. Just wait until these women have to face the realities of having THEIR children be the ones …
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:10 PM
5

Oh, don't worry. There's always someone out there who will get them pregnant. And no amount of will power can stop them from having a boy :) Mark my words, in 15 years there will be a major backlash from these women calling on changes in society, either by wisely renouncing their old believes and actions, or by simply changing the focus of their extremist actions to change things in favor of their children.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:58 PM
–

I can't wait until 15 years from now these women have to raise their teenage sons and see what a shit world they've created for them.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:26 PM
1

Which University is it?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:11 PM
5

I'd take a pic and then steal the sign and put it on the dining hall doors and see what happened.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 05:58 PM
5

That's about as perfect a description as any I can think of.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:01 PM
4

or a fat man with a big bank account
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:50 PM
11

There are literally girls with Tinder that say "if you're not at least 6'2'' swipe left." or shit like that.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:49 PM
1

I can't even get past the grammatical insanity of this paragraph. "Prison is a brutal punishment for all but women face disproportionate hardship; more are in prison for less serious offences; they are more likely to have been victims of abuse; mental health problems are more prevalent in female than male prisoners; and, of course, there is the issue of motherhood." Like, a person who writes like this shouldn't even be allowed to have something published.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:48 PM
7

lol
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:59 PM
2

idk what you're talking about, and the circumcised men are standing up and bitching, it's been happening for a couple years now.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:26 PM
3

...Is this some kinda weird joke? What the fuck are you trying to say?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:43 PM
5

There is no legal slavery in 1st world countries. Link me if you have evidence. If you want to talk about prison labor or something that's a different issue. I'd suggest you watch this also. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98f3IavuEgQ FGM is also outlawed, while MGM is not banned in any countries.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:23 PM
5

A poor way to look at it? It's a barbaric practice that should be outlawed, just like FGM. You look at 1st world countries to see a comparison. There's still slavery in 3rd world countries, and all kinds of human rights violations. Comparing the US to Zimbabwe is not a good comparison.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:05 PM
6

Do you understand the word prevalence? It's not JUST an American thing, but compare our circumcision rates to most of the 1st world countries and we're way ahead.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 06:08 PM
3

White Supremacist? Lol. Please. I never said nothing, but come on, have a sense of perspective. There has always been slavery and genocide and warfare and invasions and conquering, that's not exclusive to white people at all. But Rome was white, democracy, republics, governmental concepts. The British Empire, America, countless examples, and as far as modern history and technology etc. it's basically all white cultures. There's nothing supremacist about this -- it's facts. It's the reason all fi…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 09:08 PM
1

"Virtually" 500 years isn't much when it comes to history. And the Roman and English empire were white, and America is white, and those are three of the most, if not the most, significant civilizations in human history, especially when it comes to global influence and passing down influence throughout the future. We don't exactly keep up with anything instilled by the mongrols or the chinese, but Roman and Western/English influence is literally all over the entire globe.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:22 PM
1

Rome wasn't white? But yea, I try to tell people that part about slavery all the time. People think the white men came to Africa and just rounded blacks up with guns, and while to some extent this is sort of true, we bought slaves from Africa slavers who were black, and slavery still exists in Africa to this day. And notice none of the slaves families thought it would be better to go back to Africa, and those few that did immediately returned.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:20 PM
2

lmao that part was great
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:20 PM
3

You don't even have to 'argue' that. White men have given more to the world by an IMMENSE margin, so much so that you basically don't want to live in any country other than a predominantly white one, and all first world countries, with the exception of Japan, are white. This isn't racist, it's just a fact. Africa, the Middle East, Asia (minus Japan) are all rife with problems and barbarism in many places, uncivilized societies, lack of rights and economics and political principals, technology et…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:19 PM
1

It's not white femininity. It's Feminism and political correctness. Nothing at all wrong with femininity or masculinity. I think we all agree on that. It's the degree to which colleges have begun to cater to the outspoken females and their sensibilities, and the Feminist agendas and the politically correct SJWs who basically inhabit all Liberal Arts colleges now to some degree. Just walk through any Liberal Arts college and count how many posters you see up about rape, sexual assault, LGBT issue…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:16 PM
1

I'm not defending it. I'm attacking the wording and the logic. IF this happened, IF there was some war on birth control (which there isn't) and you somehow removed methods from being available to women, it is not an inequality, as men do not have access to those things, so there is no inequality. Doesn't mean it is right, but there is no inequality. It's like banning men from giving birth.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 12:02 AM
2

IF you restrict womens' access to other forms of birth control, you are not denying them a right men have.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 11:50 PM
3

I didn't insinuate men should have a say in abortion. The ability for men to have birth control options shouldn't have any bearing on women's choices -- I never implied that either. Yeah, condoms suck, and so does being circumcised. Condoms were the only method of contraception at one point in time. I never said there was a validity to restricting female access to birth control. You really have a great way of jumping to your own conclusion you don't enjoy, and then trying to reverse engineer my …
/r/MensRights08/05/15 11:29 PM
11

Access to birth control? Please. There are a billion methods of birth control available to women, and basically only one for men - condoms. And if condoms were the only method available, there would be no outcry, as condoms are effective. Just, as a female, insist that you use condoms while having sex. shrug Even if women were denied completely all alternative methods of birth control, they would still have methods of birth control that are every bit as effective. Men don't have any alternatives…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 08:53 PM
6

It's more like female + tumblr = SJW or just flaming idiot. tumblr in general is a shithole.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 08:51 PM
2

So what is moderate/mainstream Feminism if not extreme?
/r/MensRights08/05/15 08:49 PM
5

The fact that anyone could ever pretend that society is pro-rape of women is just beyond even ludicrous. It's a testament to the ridiculousness of our times that people even debate this.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 08:49 PM
1

Keep tucking and trucking! ;) Good for you. I typically avoid these conversations though. If I run into people touting Feminism I just stop talking to them in public, because it's not worth it with people I don't know.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:53 PM
1

Christ, how many times do we have to go over this on this board? We need to compile some resources for the side bar so we don't have to waste time typing everytime someone brings up the wage/earnings gap.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:01 PM
1

No one is saying it's a modern phenomenon, and not until Feminism became so overbearing did you hear men complaining. The ridiculousness comes from women crying and bitching over things like manspreading and girls in video games being hot, claiming that's sexism and repression from "The Patriarchy"
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:36 PM
1

well yeah, but who gives a shit? It's a video game.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:35 PM
0

Look, i ain't saying that people should vote with their genitals, although, if my was long enough and dexterous enough, I would, but you're talking about an issue that has long been around with men and voting Right, you're clearly wonderful at expressing yourself with words. And thanks for clarifying your intentions with your post -- now I know it's even more worthless than I thought. You might as well have just said "dumb people use dumb examples to justify dumb behavior" and walked away.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:51 PM
1

Of course she's a Democrat. No way Conservative/Republican women have this in their agendas when voting.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:34 PM
2

Wait. So you're saying that the fact that there were no female candidates to vote for is evidence of men voting for men due to sexism?... So if there are no black people in my town to hire for jobs and I hire all white men I'm clearly a racist?
/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:33 PM
5

The DailyMail may be shit, this story may be anecdotal, it may be all bullshit, but I can tell you this -- I've seen this type of shit 100 times in my life. Men will fight it out and get on with it, or be open with their dislike for one another and move on and find a way to get past it, even just for the sake of appearance of the business. With women it's a whole other story.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:58 PM
1

That is personal rational choice and decision not institutionalized or political policy
/r/MensRights01/05/15 10:01 PM
2

Bullshit. Try to kill me you forfeit your right to life.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 09:58 PM
12

I mean, who really cares? In real life, this is just a silly situation and he could walk away any time. What we need to do, instead of being disgusted by this, is just show Feminists that something like this isn't necessarily some enormous sexual harassment case. Things like this need to be seen on a case by case basis, need to be evaluated with some sense of jurisprudence. If the guy is laughing and everyone's laughing and he's not walking away, then why would this be an issue? If we claim this…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:50 PM
1

I hate to be stereotypical in this kind of thing, but why is it that all these SJWs and protesters to events like this always look the same. It's always someone trying to be counter culture with their hair or their dress or the way they speak, some kind of tumblr SJW LGBT alliance, CIS hating, obnoxious idiots who don't know what they're talking about, bored college kids who talk about 'spaces' and 'dialogue' and 'exploration.' You can easily tell the people at your event who are going to try an…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:39 PM
11

God Lena is fucking psycho.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 02:31 PM
9

no it doesn't. he isn't the one being referred to in that paragraph.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 02:44 PM
1

Who said I liked Objectivism so much? You haven't answered a single thing, and you act like I'm uninformed. It is entertaining, because you just sum up so many people who think they can participate in an argument when they know nothing, then accuse those people of knowing nothing. If you had anything to back up what you were saying you would have said it long ago, but instead you just keep posting worthless replies and ad hominem.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 07:51 PM
2

I bet you not. The number of people who have solid reasons for any of their votes is small.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:33 PM
1

Just because Ayn may or may not have said something doesn't make it Gods truth, especially when you say she's a nutcase. Him saying this is a Christian nation also doesn't really matter, as I said I don't base my votes on social policy. You've refused to tell me about his stance on small government and what you find problematic, won't back up your claims about objectivism being a cult (which relates to this not at all) or about how Austrian Economics has failed. Yet you continue to act intellect…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:32 PM
1

I'm not religious. Ayn wouldn't agree. The majority of the values in American culture come from Christianity. Objectivism isn't a cult in a way. And I didn't ask for a link to his take on small government, I asked you to expand on your dislike for his take on small government and why.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:07 PM
10

Jezebel is just like...horrendous lol
/r/MensRights22/04/15 04:28 PM
1

His take on small government? Elaborate. Austrian Economics are not failed conceptually. Ayn Rand wasn't a nutcase. And this IS a Christian nation.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 04:26 PM
2

I don't want Jeb either. I'll be voting, so far, for Rand. I don't vote based on social issues anymore like abortion or gay marriage. I could give a fuck about those with the state this country is in.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 03:29 PM
1

Think about this. If Hilary is president we will have had this Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama-Clinton. Two families running the country for (you can do the real math) something like 22 of the last 30 years or something.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 03:24 PM
1

Are YOU ready for Hilary? blowsbrainsout
/r/MensRights22/04/15 03:20 PM
1

Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't there several studies that proved that the lack of women in politics, tech, etc was coming from their own will? You're right. No one believes it though.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 02:46 PM
1

The rape % is wrong however as many recent posts have started to explore.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 02:46 PM
4

well no shit. But I"m talking about the average college kid at the average good university.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 02:31 PM
–

College kids are seriously the most obnoxious cunts in the world these days. It's unbelievable. Not an intelligent thing comes out of their mouths, and it's not just on the internet. When I was graduating it was getting bad, but when I go to a college campus now, and see the level of just 'intellectual' masturbation, discussions that lead nowhere, lack of stance on anything substantial, lack of understanding of history and philosophy, economics, the legal system, and just so many people screamin…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:58 AM
2

so go take an adult male who is uncircumcised and cut off his foreskin and tell me it's not mutilation or barbaric.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:47 AM
3

It's not a false analogy at all. It's the premise that a parent can choose to surgically modify their child's body at birth. The 'medical benefits' to circumcision are essentially non-existent. We have soap and water to wash your fucking foreskin, and we have condoms and HIV tests so that your foreskin won't theoretically increase your risk of contracting HIV when you sleep w/someone who has it. You also say that "I would have probably still chosen cut." This is just pure unsubstantiated conject…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:46 AM
3

No one is trying to make you feel bad.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 02:43 AM
2

Yeah. The foreskin you are born with that contains nerve endings which are lost during circumcision. Just google it. You're very uptight and combative, because you are emotionally invested in your restoration process. As I said, go ahead, I hope it helps you, but it doesn't actually restore your foreskin.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:41 PM
3

You feel like I'm attacking. I'm not. Go ahead and do it. I'm more than happy for you. Tugging etc. is not real foreskin. Foreskin contains nerve endings that are removed during circumcision. Simply stretching your skin is not actually creating foreskin, it's simply stretching skin over the glans. If you're doing this you should have done enough research by now to know this. There's plenty of easy google searches that will confirm this. As I said, go ahead and do it. It takes years just so every…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:36 PM
4

Go ahead. Why do you feel like I'm attacking you? And so what if insurance doesn't cover it? Stretching your skin back is not real foreskin. Plain and simple. I'm not insulting you, I'm just clarifying.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:28 PM
8

I love how everyone thinks that a person's offhand personal opinion should be respected enough to be a top opinion. People upvote things worthy of discussion. Your post is not worthy of discussion what so ever. You can be pro-circumcision if you actually have some sort of argument to contribute.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:23 PM
3

The MRM or MRAs do not have an organized stance on abortion. Stop spreading misinformation. And your comparison doesn't even make sense.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:21 PM
1

Cheers.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:21 PM
1

There's always two sides to an issue and in this case it's simply a matter of choice from the parents. Why would it be the parents choice? Where does that end? What if the parents don't like their son's ears? Should they be able to just give him plastic surgery as a child? What if they don't like their daughter's vagina? Just operate on it? Because of course anything done to a female is female genital mutilation, but the widely accepted practice of circumcision is not labeled as male genital mut…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:20 PM
2

Except it's not real foreskin. It's stretching the existing skin, and can provide benefits to the sensitivity of the glans, as it is now protected 24/7 as it should be, but the lost nerve endings in the foreskin are gone. Foregen.org is working on beginning human trials of growing foreskin using stemcells and have promising results thusfar.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:17 PM
1

My mom sucks as spacial relations and parking as well.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 02:30 PM
2

Oh nooo. Haha. It's getting worse
/r/MensRights19/04/15 08:49 PM
3

That, and the CEO and the pervasive mentality of what is acceptable to discuss, not only on Reddit but in the mainstream paradigm of modern thought.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 07:13 PM
2

guess
/r/MensRights19/04/15 06:56 PM
-2

Ayn Rand didn't believe in a female president. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cL8g7zy6qxw
/r/MensRights19/04/15 03:51 PM
4

FYI this TIL thread was top #1 post on the front page and then was quickly removed.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 03:49 PM
2

An audience filled with a bunch of 30 something liberal arts college grads. Surprise surprise they all sound the same typical shit.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 02:04 AM
2

Okay
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:56 PM
2

Anyone doing business with them will see through this. It's not like they employ child molesters.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:52 PM
2

I really, really doubt that. Anyone with any remote brain can see this is absolute horseshit. No one is going to fear backlash by doing business with them.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:23 PM
2

Except anyone with a brain, aka. anyone they would actually hire, sees right through this story.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 03:39 PM
3

This company is likely facing heavy competition like most are. They need to hire the right people to survive. It is not their responsibility to compromise their well being as a company in the name of being "ethically righteous". Besides, there is nothing saintly about hiring someone with an unprofessional attitude. They can be perfectly ethical and still hire the best person for the job. And you think that a woman who takes to FB to complain and smear their company publicly was probably right fo…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:41 PM
3

Definitely. I went to a school w/a dresscode and men could either wear shirt and tie or turtleneck and sweater, and the sweater would be approved on the day you wore it as either yes or no, and if no, you could never wear it again. The girls' dresscode on the other hand...The girls would always laugh at us saying they basically wore what they would normally wear at home, minus t-shirts and jeans and shirts that showed too much cleavage.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:39 PM
3

Make some shit up....doesn't matter....then defend the "principle" that the lie is demonstrating. PRECISELY
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:08 PM
4

combine the two and you have the truth
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:08 PM
3

In the past, men were always expected to be money makers in the family. By making money, men could more easily attract a mate. Money had an added incentive. In modern times, this incentive is disappearing. What?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:05 PM
1

Feminism doesn't need to be taken back. It's dead. It has no purpose other than to piss people off and ruin lives.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 02:28 PM
4

Jesus CHRIST. Unbelievable. I already hated this chick, now it's just a lost cause.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 02:15 PM
2

This bitch is fucking nuts.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 05:59 PM
5

What gives? Feminism is full of shit and contradictions. Simple.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:21 PM
13

Then every single girl is a psychopath.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:07 PM
5

so sue them both
/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:05 PM
0

WOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRLLLLLLLDDDDDDDDSSSSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/15 02:38 AM
5

So don't respect Bill Gates or Steve Jobs or Warren Buffet or Jay-Z or Richard Branson or anyone shrug Just respect the painters who paint obscurely in their rooms.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:37 AM
–

No respect for the people who do. If they can't get there by merit, then they can fuck off. You are absolutely delusional lol. There isn't a massive name you know who didn't step on people on their way up the ladder.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 11:26 PM
–

If campus rape is such a problem why do women outnumber men in higher education and continue to flock to university in high numbers?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 09:18 PM
1

Women are totally independent and capable and responsible!...except when they need to do something then it's everyone else's job to do it for them! /feministlogic
/r/MensRights09/04/15 12:37 AM
9

That's the saddest part about modern Feminism -- we CAN'T tell when someone is being sarcastic anymore, because half the time or more they're serious :C
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:19 PM
5

I would. We do happen to be America, so we're pretty well secure from invasion from the rest of the world, but I'd rather focus on how we declare war, policing politicians, transparency in politics etc. than on dismantling the armed forces. They're not a threat to our freedoms at home -- the police are. Homeland security is. etc. etc.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 08:59 PM
3

NO one in mensrights will argue a military isn't necessary. The idea of the disposable man is that the way our military is treated/ordered by the ruling parties is what we take issue with. Forced conscription, wars that are declared for private interest groups and people profiting of the deaths of young men. No one will argue that we don't need a military, and if we are going to have one, we want it to be as strong as possible, which will not happen if we lower standards for who can be admitted.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 07:47 PM
1

The mind set may not be changing, but the legality of things will. False rape accusations and stories will lead to changes in laws and reporting. More reporting on female rape and domestic violence will change things. It matters less what these blind followers think, as they have no cases to bring to court. It matters more what their active opposition thinks and does.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 07:38 PM
3

Lol. I also just realized it was phatphace that posted, and he's outta control.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 07:17 PM
1

Tea Party is dead. And so what? Democrats/Republicans/Liberals/Conservatives -- all of them ignore things they don't like and deny things, but Feminism can't even sit on T.V. to even the worst interviewer and make an argument that wins. You can show on T.V. that global warming has facts behind it and make an argument that people understand, and the people who don't believe it are dismissed and hold no power anyway. Feminists cry for more power for this for that, but they aren't able to hold an a…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 07:12 PM
1

The Tea Party is a political movement and had facts behind many of its issues, and is dead. Cults are not mainstream. Khmer Rouge and war and fascism are entirely different issues, Feminism is not calling for the armed forces to go to war. Anti-vaccination, while absurd, is not mainstream and is condemned by basically everyone and is losing traction, even less than it used to have (which wasn't much). Feminism isn't going to cause war or the plague.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:50 PM
2

Most popular causes that have succeeded such as what? The Feminism backlash has already begun, that's why you see so many people on t.v. trying to defend it. Problem is, anyone with a brain can see right through them, and more backlash is created.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:30 PM
2

You can already see it happening. /r/mensrights exists, there are people actually speaking out on T.V. and standing up to Feminist lies and bullshit. Gamergate, people like thundrf00t, and the actual attention false rape cases are starting to get. Things change, and this will too, and probably more quickly than you think, because unlike /r/mensrights, feminism has zero facts behind it and there's only so long you can maintain that.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:11 PM
2

No I don't, but I think that while all this female privilege and whining we have in Western society at the moment is acceptable now, and women get easier sentences and whatnot, pretty soon there will be a backlash against it and I can't wait.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:55 PM
7

Wow. Yet another person who is impossible to have an intelligent argument with. This seems to be the norm now. Someone posts something refuting or rebutting one of your statements, and then the way to counter is to just repeat yourself and act as though that person never said what they've done. Fortunately for me, I've been through this enough to understand the proper response, which is to leave this discussion and allow everyone else to see how terrible your points are.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:18 PM
2

Text is massive. I posted the things I thought were relevant here, but the entire article is HUGE.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:58 PM
3

Oh, look she showed up. All I'm saying is -- as a girl, we're taught from an early age, A LOT of ways to "not get raped". And I was taught as a man, ways not to get your ass kicked, ways to deal with a home invasion/intruder, ways to build a fire if you're stranded, how to fix your car etc. etc. These are simply survival/safety things people are taught in order to protect themselves. Can't we talk to guys when they're young too? About consent, sexual aggression, and rape in general? TALK about i…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:50 PM
5

WELL, since the comment was deleted in which someone claimed that women are more into rough sex/degrading sex etc. than men, and that PornHub had released the stats, and /u/phatphace asked for a source and I did all this to then find the post deleted, HERE IT IS: You don't have to go too far to figure out 50 Shades of Grey is the best selling novel ever. But okay, http://www.pornhub.com/insights/what-women-want/ "Things get heated pretty quickly after this though, with the Hardcore, Rough Sex, D…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:43 PM
4

but you seem out of touch with typical frat culture. That's frat culture...not male culture. Many colleges don't even have frats, and where they do exist, the guys not in frats generally consider them douchebags, as do the girls, and the only girls that gravitate towards frat boys are pretty pathetic to begin with. The majority of men are not frat boys, and the majority of girls do not hang w/them.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:35 PM
11

IDK what your point is, but I can address your minor points: When you consider men's exposure to pornography As opposed to womens' exposure? Another myth: only men watch porn. There are plenty of types of porn that don't feature what you just described. In fact, the porn in which the male actor directly calls the woman degrading names is a specific genre of porn as is-- the most mainstream kinds involve slapping and choking of the female actress This is another type of porn that is either genre …
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:34 PM
6

I can't wait for the backlash in a few years against all this stupid shit.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:23 PM
1

Who's advocating abuse?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:10 PM
16

One of the broader things I've noticed in the men and women relationship, is that women tend to make fun of a lot of the things men do, because they don't understand them, but once they get into those same positions, behave just the same -- if not worse than those men. It's almost the sort of situation of a child complaining about his parents his entire life, then becoming a parent, and suddenly saying how now he totally understands why his parents behaved the way they did -- minus the loving yo…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 08:24 PM
9

With Cosby or Jackson there's no convincing evidence of a group collaborating to screw them over. There's also no evidence proving their guilt.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:24 PM
1

Talking someone into having sex w/you, whatever means unless you're blackmailing them or something, isn't rape. People need to stop accepting this concept. It's bad enough we apply it to men, the last thing we need is for this to become widespread and accepted for both genders.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:17 PM
1

no false accusations will never happen.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 10:21 PM
1

That's what every movement thinks and then the pendulum never stops swinging
/r/MensRights02/04/15 10:13 PM
2

What a lot of times can happen is that the prosecution gets pissed and decides to try and get you max sentencing on your other "crimes" so they can get you on something.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:28 PM
0

Have a webcam on your computer or in your dorm. Either a normal old webcam or a security camera that feeds to your computer. Then you'll be charged for video taping a person w/out their consent, possible peeping tom laws etc, and production of pornography! lol
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:21 PM
4

Sounds like she raped him, he didn't consent to be used like that. That isn't rape, someone having sex w/you for ulterior motives. Let's stop this trying to swing the pendulum way back the other way.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:20 PM
16

“— didn’t say ‘yes, give it to me,’ right?” asked Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Kristen Yamamoto. “No she did not,” Strong answered. “She didn’t say ‘yes Tyler, I want to have sex with you,’” said Yamamoto during cross examination. THIS is what they try in America now. That affirmative consent bullshit. Nobody, especially college kids who have been drinking, fucking ask each other if they want to have sex while they're in the moment. Maybe now you can text each other that, but that's about it.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:19 PM
6

I don't even have to read that to know that's not true. That's like saying legalizing alcohol increases bootlegging.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 06:35 AM
2

You're just a tangential idiot with no intellect who likes to argue. Ta ta. edit: and you asking me if I'm popular just confirms your high school status. Even less reason to argue.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:39 PM
2

You don't have a single fact. You say there's a masculine perspective on Reddit, a male perspective. Based on nothing you say this. I point out that there is one gender specific subreddit on Reddit, and it is for women. You ignore my questions and provide nothing but your own opinion. There's no impasse. You lose. If this was a class in any classroom in America you'd lose.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:22 PM
3

Yeah, to a normal person we'd say he's consenting to it, but if the genders were reversed, he'd be going to trial or some shit for coercing a woman into having sex, which is basically rape these days.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:10 PM
12

While this woman is definitely misguided, I don't think that this represents an example of some overarching trend. You don't think there's an overarching trend of women getting married and then getting fat as fuck in this country? How come it's joked about all over the mainstream stand up circuit and on T.V. and there's an insane amount of page space dedicated to women in women's magazines talking about how to 'keep the pounds off during marriage' or some shit. Just as a personal anecdote, my gf…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:09 PM
–

Or even "My wife isn't having sex with me anymore, because she no longer finds me physically attractive. She's buying a tub of lube to ensure penetration, and we are setting up some counseling sessions." =\ Pitchforks on the way.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:06 PM
5

All you have is your own personal opinion and conjecture to present. Absolutely nothing else. The actual facts, of what default subreddits are etc. are completely against you. And even IF Reddit had a what...male perspective? So what?
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:51 PM
2

The vast majority of Reddit is from the male perspective Says who? What does this even mean? None of the default sub-reddits are dedicated to men, but there is in fact now a default sub-reddit specifically dedicated to women...
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:19 PM
3

...do you realize what you're saying?
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:15 PM
3

lol, that's why /r/TwoXChromosomes is a default right
/r/MensRights31/03/15 05:20 PM
1

Why not just look at the argument made by the person and see if it makes sense to you, rather than trying to credit or discredit the place or person it comes from? Look deeper and listen hard to everything you read or hear etc. and make up your own mind.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 05:26 AM
–

She makes really good videos.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 03:23 PM
2

That's true. Sometimes I wonder if she's actually as stupid as she appears, or if a lot of it is an act. She's clearly not a gamer, as has been pointed out numerous times. It wouldn't actually surprise me if this was all an act, but the older videos of her before she started to be public and put out youtube videos and stuff, show her spouting off the same sort of crap she is now, just to a lesser degree. I have a feeling she actually believes a lot of what she says, but also realizes how profita…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 06:57 PM
2

lol
/r/MensRights27/03/15 04:59 PM
1

The pancakes? They were.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 01:58 PM
–

Anita is good at being a cunt who exploits things and gets famous for it. So? According to your argument Kim Kardashian is a clear winner against any female who makes less money than her. Goals are goals, and intellect is intellect, and Anita is outclassed mentally by pretty much anyone with a brain in their head, as seen by the mass of videos and responses that show how stupid she is. By your logic any one of the Jersey Shore people is a clear winner. Who are you Charlie Sheen? WINNING!
/r/MensRights27/03/15 05:18 AM
–

Well that's like saying my goal is world piece and yours is making a pancake so you're winning cause you just made a pancake.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 04:23 AM
1

480 days holy shit that's a long time.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:43 AM
–

Not to insult Karen, because I love her videos and think she's great and full of awesome logic, but it doesn't take much to mentally outclass Anita.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:38 AM
9

You should take the original post + authors picture and then your quote where you changed man etc. to Jew.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:37 AM
12

And for the millionth time, it's basically all the Left that create issues we discuss here.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:41 AM
6

Nah. I don't care about that shit. Let them print that all they want -- as long as men's magazines can print similar shit without being massacred by Feminists.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 02:17 AM
2

You have a link, you don't post it. Circumcision isn't medically necessary. This has not only been proven in countless medical journals, but if it were necessary the rates in all 1st world countries would be similar to vaccination rates, and people would be being circumcised as adults if they somehow were not as children. Circumcision as a child is not an elective procedure, and majority rules is not how we determine every issue. You're uneducated. Circumcision is not always safe, there are plen…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 06:39 AM
2

I address all of your 'points.' You'er full of shit. You don't need to know anything about me. I've already said serious issues may require circumcision, but circumcision to possibly prevent issues in the future, maybe, is not valid. Now you want to argue definitions of things with me. You're seriously, honest to God -- slow. You're a slow person with idiotic beliefs. I'm seriously done talking to you this time. "I can hold up charts too" you say. You just dismiss everything, effectively putting…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 06:27 AM
4

You're just a fucking idiot. You won't answer a single question. If circumcision was such a valid medical practice, it would be done all over the world. I don't care if I'm insulting you now, it doesn't matter, because you ignore everything else anyway. The US, over 70% of males are circumcised. In Britain, Scandinavia, and the rest of Europe, the rates vary from 1-9% in some countries, to 10-20% in other countries. If circumcision was such a valid medical practice don't you think the rest of th…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 08:20 PM
5

By definition if there is one reason that outweighs the risk then it is a valid medical practice. That's wrong again. It's up to the patient to decide in all these circumstances. Doctors cannot force procedures upon you if you refuse, but circumcision is forced upon you, and these 'risks' you discuss are exaggerations and bullshit. If they were true, why are most Europeans not circumcised? Why do women in Europe not care? Why do uncircumcised men not choose to circumcise their penises when they …
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:32 PM
1

I don't recall ever blatantly calling you dumb or retarded or stupid. I may have asked you if you were those things, and called you ignorant, but ignorant isn't an insult, it's true. You are ignorant about this subject.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:29 PM
1

idk what playground means, but you have serious social issues, bra
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:01 PM
9

Might as well lock everyone in a room with filtered air and water dispensed on a regular basis. Much safer than real life.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:00 PM
1

To say that I was "mutilated" is insulting to me, and my family, and my beliefs. No it's not.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:19 PM
13

The only reason to do so is when there's one of those insanely specific horrific diseases where you can't retract the foreskin or the foreskin grew in a painful way etc., and even then full circumcision is rarely necessary.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:15 PM
4

Men understand risk as a scale (more risks = more chances of something bad happening) while women understand risk as a dichotomy Brilliantly put, and I can attest in my personal experience that this is the case. "That's not safe!" is something I hear from women all the time, especially when my father and I would work on something. Step up ONE rung on a step ladder, "That's not safe!" from my mom. Doesn't matter if it was one rung or ten, it's just not safe. Most of my friends' mothers are this w…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:13 PM
8

I've said this 900 times to Feminists. I'm 6'4'' 240, and I don't go alone late at night to anywhere sketchy. My town is very safe, but there are still areas that make me nervous, and I wouldn't wear anything flashy, or do anything that might get me in trouble. Women act like men just walk around all arrogant anywhere they want at any time of day and are fine.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:11 PM
1

Why fix something that ain't broke? Exactly. So why circumcise your children? And yeah, if some wildly unrealistic thing happened then yeah, people would do something about it.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:38 PM
1

You didn't bring anything worthwhile to the table even when you were trying to. If your claims about circumcision being not only aesthetically pleasing but also beneficial health wise, why is it so few males choose to have the procedure as adults?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:53 AM
9

like women who've never played video games complaining about video games :)
/r/MensRights18/03/15 11:25 PM
1

He won't. He's trolling or ignorant. I dropped out of our discussion when I realized this.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 11:12 PM
1

You haven't engaged in any argument. Just look back at your posts vs mine. You're either insanely stupid or a massive troll, which is why I'm no longer continuing this discussion.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 10:00 PM
1

Of course I want an argument...You presented your feelings, I explained to you why they are invalid, and you just wave your hands in the air. Your belief that something is fine because it's done that way and everyone seems to accept it around you doesn't mean it's okay. Everyone felt fine about slavery once too. Everyone felt fine about lots of things that weren't okay. Just because you don't miss something you never had, and the girls you know, who have probably never seen an uncircumcised peni…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 09:50 PM
1

Uh, no. Your 'beliefs' aren't beliefs -- they're bullshit. I can 'believe' that removing a kid's pinky at birth is fine too, but that doesn't mean it should be respected. Your beliefs have no grounding in anything, you don't listen to reason or citations or arguments or anything, you just think what you want and that's that. So I don't respect that at all, or you.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 09:36 PM
4

cause Reddit is massively leftist/liberal?
/r/MensRights18/03/15 09:02 PM
8

Yeah, NBC and their anchors are so much more unbiased and reliable...
/r/MensRights18/03/15 09:01 PM
7

I know what you mean. Liberalism is the new Fascism. Fox WILL discuss things they don't agree with due to their obvious bias, but will at least let people have a discussion, because they know it brings ratings. You don't see that on the Liberal mainstream news shows -- they simply ignore and completely gloss over anything that doesn't fit their agenda.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 09:00 PM
–

I haven't looked at this case, so I'm not applying what I'm saying here to this precise situation, but bringing fairness to the legal system does not mean raising female sentencing on every crime to what a male would serve, but making REASONABLE sentences to everyone regardless of gender. As I said, I haven't looked at the details of this case, and these types of consentual/non-consentual sex cases are always difficult, but we shouldn't strive for harsher sentencing on women all the time, we sho…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 08:53 PM
-6

This.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 08:51 PM
1

You would.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 08:29 PM
2

That's not even remotely close. Your logic abilities are horrendous.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 05:50 PM
2

I'm sure the haters have all their evidence to throw my way, but it doesn't affect my opinion Well this just sums it all up. There IS plenty of evidence about circumcision, that's been posted here countless times, so many times that you having not read it is just embarrassing for you at this point. The reason family and friends in social circumstances prefer, or claim to prefer, circumcised penises is because that's what they know and that's what they're used to. The reason you don't feel like y…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 05:32 PM
1

no seriously. I didn't downvote you either.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 03:44 PM
2

no
/r/MensRights18/03/15 03:44 PM
3

You don't believe it's genital mutilation to chop off a part of your penis or to do so to your son who can't consent? Are you just trolling or what?
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:08 PM
0

troll thread. move along.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 03:32 PM
7

so anything coming from 4chan automatically = wrong/bad/unworthy? Some of the most amazing shit to ever happen from the internet originated on 4chan.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 06:31 PM
8

/r/theredpill is about picking up women and generalizing women etc. etc. This has nothing to do with how women are. This story is about how society is treating women, about how society views women, and about how Feminism has changed things. There's nothing /r/redpillish about it.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 06:31 PM
2

What exactly do you plan on doing? Force women to have abortions? No. Cheapen the role of fatherhood by saying he can impregnate a woman then run away placing the entirety of the burden on her? You can't 'impregnate a woman' without her consent. Women have access to birth control just like men do, and it takes two to tango. Isn't that unfair? You mean like massive child support payments monthly while a woman doesn't work?
/r/MensRights06/03/15 06:03 PM
3

Very prophetic lol.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:21 PM
14

because modern Feminists are SJWs. The end.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:19 PM
0

Not off hand I don't, but if you google you'll find it easily enough. I have some friends from/in Japan, some girls as well, who will attest to this. It's bad on the trains cause they're so insanely packed there's nothing you can do anyway.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 11:54 PM
6

And I have many friends who live there, and friends who have moved here from there, who explain that while it may happen a bit to everyone like you claim due to overcrowding, it's socially acceptable for older men to grope younger women and there's no recourse for them what so ever and it's a difficult problem for them.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 05:26 PM
–

Yes actually. Why don't you look into it instead of just making assumptions.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 05:13 PM
–

Welllll Japan does have a real problem with men groping women in public and no one doing anything.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:30 PM
-7

A lot of MRAs don't want women in combat.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:43 PM
–

Women cast wide nets to catch a very specific type of fish (high status fish, Ahi Tuna), but also get offended when they snag codfish. Amazing analogy haha.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 05:05 PM
–

|When men do hit back, women get hurt more. So? If you're a small man you don't hit a big man do you? Women hit men, because they think the man won't hit back, and most of the time they're correct.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 04:00 PM
4

the REAL issue isn't that, it's that we're taught NOT to hit back when a girl hits you, no matter what.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 03:59 PM
6

Anita is a felon?
/r/MensRights13/02/15 06:27 PM
1

Not true at all
/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:08 PM
0

Because girls some how convinced the world that dating multiple men is the same as single guys hooking up with chicks at bars, and that if you criticize it you're sexist. I don't play that game :)
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:06 AM
5

I was once on OkCupid a few years back before Tinder became the thing. I met a lot of girls, went on plenty of dates, some worked out some didn't, and whatever. I got sick of it and got rid of it. I got Tinder when it first hit, all my friends were on it, and started swiping. Got a lot of matches, and basically the only conversations went "hey" and then silence, if anything. Tinder IS just an app for girls to boost their self esteem. That's it. I have girl friends who confirm this, and I have ye…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 04:08 AM
5

ROFL. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 07:50 PM
2

I just meant his status was higher as a musician, probably a bad example, especially considering what happened to him.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 03:49 PM
2

No, because everyone is different and can be damaged by different things. If Taylor Swift had accidentally tweeted something that Eminem says outwardly, she'll be attacked/treated/responded to differently than Eminem. All artists/famous people are potentially easy targets in the sense that their reputations can be damaged quite easily, potentially, but it depends on by who and why etc. ie. It's easier to damage Taylor Swift for making anti-gay comments than it is to damage Eminem, who outwardly …
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:48 AM
2

Either way, Thicke got attacked and took more of a hit than anyone, regardless of whether he fought or spoke back or whatever. He was perceived as more of an easy target imo. In the sense of the discussion when discussing artists making insensitive remarks about women or gays or whatever, the artist apologizes almost always because they receive bad press etc., so yeah it's a career move, whether you want to say salvage or not or whatever. Not sure why we're really arguing over that though.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:06 AM
1

Thicke wasn't fighting back, he was just trying to avoid controversy. And artists apologizing is just a career move, it isn't the same thing as being targeted unfairly by a group and having to like salvage your career.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 05:31 AM
2

WHAT is your point. I'm really not getting this at all in how it relates to this sub.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 05:02 AM
2

No, what specifically is going on on this board that makes that a problem? I don't see it. It's actually quite good in my opinion that we start acknowledging the Feminist bias at most liberal schools. Basically any liberal college you can even think about attending, or really any college that doesn't have a significant conservative base, is going to be promoting Feminist ideology, either heavily through Feminist groups on campus, or through simply blindly following the 'mainstream' ideology of t…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 04:40 AM
2

Exactly; the rape GENRE is always criticized broadly by everyone as being misogynistic or anti-gay or whatever, but Thicke got it BAD, and I maintain that it's because he's an easy target. He has no fight back, no way to fight back. His entire image is one of pleasing the ladies. He's a ladies man and makes music for girls. He can't come out swinging, he has to just play it cool, and we all know, when you play it cool with Feminists, or try to take the high ground, they just come at you harder. …
/r/MensRights08/02/15 04:34 AM
1

I'm not literally calling him a nerd, I'm saying that he was an easy target right there at that time. The line "I know you want it" was easily criticizable (if that's a word) and he didn't have the established monumental status of another artist where their protests would have been shut down. Of course there have been plenty of other popular guys who didn't receive the same criticism. Just cite any rapper ever. You don't see Jay-Z being under constant attack by Feminists in the way Robin Thicke …
/r/MensRights08/02/15 04:06 AM
3

I mean exactly what this guy said For the fame reason you bully the nerd in the classroom, not the popular guy. Going after Robin Thicke is doing just that.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 03:55 AM
2

way to miss the point
/r/MensRights08/02/15 03:41 AM
1

Right. Hardly a huge target.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 02:53 AM
2

No, I don't get what you're trying to say here. What is your point? I already acknowledged the square rectangle argument. And so? What exactly is it that is happening on this board that you have issue with related to this premise?
/r/MensRights08/02/15 02:46 AM
2

I fail to see how that applies here.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 01:42 AM
2

No. No I don't see how that logic works.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 01:41 AM
3

I don't get the point of this post. Are you trying to say a square is a rectangle but a rectangle isn't a square, but with people? Yes, we know this...but the truth of the matter is the overwhelming majority of Feminists qualify as liberal, you say it yourself. So what is the issue here?
/r/MensRights07/02/15 11:20 PM
4

Yeah, but in all fairness Robin Thicke isn't exactly Michael Jackson. He has basically had one break out song, and they attacked it because it wasn't actually misogynistic and they could just use the easy "I know you want it" line to misconstrue the entire message of the song.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 10:56 PM
8

bam. spot on.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 10:55 PM
1

It basically is...
/r/MensRights07/02/15 06:11 PM
87

No, you missed the joke 100%
/r/MensRights07/02/15 03:50 PM
-1

What are you a second hand English speaker? I am an honor student with a BA in English and a published author and journalist. Your writing sucks and your understanding of what I was saying is almost even worse. Don't blame the language when you could have easily written what you actually meant if you knew how. The fact that you have to write a book to me back on each response shows just how terrible you are at making a point concisely.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:15 AM
-1

I never said it wasn't understandable, it's just absolute shit and requires being read like 6 times. I backed it up, it's not my fault you can't read critically either.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:38 AM
-3

Oh, God seriously just fuck off. Your writing is brilliant. You should win a Pulitzer. I have no idea what I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:08 AM
-4

I'm not literally arguing those points I'm showing you how badly you wrote
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:35 AM
-7

Because you should care about how people perceive you and how you communicate with the world? Do you have a BA or a GED? I do find it amusing though that mens desires are generally to be better than they are, while womens tend to be that everyone else over-values them instead of them raising their own value. You say mens desires are generally to be better than they are. This is a wreck. You need to say something like "in general, men desire to be better than they are," as you are using 'mens des…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:47 AM
-7

in the amount of time this post took you could have written a sensical first post
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:29 AM
-9

No, not at all. That is written like shit. Your pronouns are all fucked up and undeclared. That's like some community college writing right there.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:51 PM
-7

I do find it amusing though that mens desires are generally to be better than they are, while womens tend to be that everyone else over-values them instead of them raising their own value. What. The. Fuck. Are. You. Trying. To. Fucking. Say!?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:28 PM
2

ab-so-fucking-lutely. ANYONE who has gone to a liberal university can attest to this. The majority of my friends went to upper tier/top tier liberal universities, and the 'free speech' there is abysmal. If you aren't trashing Republicans, screaming pro-abortion or a Feminist, you basically aren't free to say anything.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:54 PM
1

rofl wtf
/r/MensRights03/02/15 04:41 PM
1

Actually, really. It doesn't matter what the motivation was -- killing is killing, murder is murder. Whether you murder your brother because you think he's ugly or because he was going to tell your mom you ate her donuts, murder is murder. If you want to draw a line of delineation between murder and abortion it has to be a time one, ie. 2 months vs 8 months, not intention.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 09:36 PM
2

Don't live in Africa!? Check your privilege! Not the worst off person in the entire world? Check your privilege!
/r/MensRights26/01/15 09:07 PM
2

Clearly. It doesn't 'make it better for women,' it makes it 'better' for the women you place in those positions, at the expense of the men who had those positions or were better qualified for those positions. Also, the free fucking market would lead to women in those positions if that's what the market wanted. The Feminists do NOT want the Free Market to place women in these positions, they want government intervention, which is not free market. Grow a fucking brain.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 08:17 PM
1

How does "it make it better for women" And it wouldn't be the 'free market' putting those women in those positions. Are you retarded?
/r/MensRights25/01/15 08:12 PM
1

I think you're missing the point. It's not about whether a female company vs a male company will do better or always do better etc., it's about whether or not the lack of women is evidence of discrimination, and that the Feminist argument that more women should be in these positions is a terrible argument. Simply adding a woman doesn't make something better, but that's the argument being made, that somehow women are being held back from certain jobs and careers and that people should be forced t…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 07:58 PM
6

In this survey[1] it turned out that nearly half of married women had selected a "backup husband" and many have had a guy in the waiting with "unfinished business." I can definitely say I know at least 3 girls who I am the 'backup husband' to, only because I have no desire to get married at this stage in my life, or to those particular women. I also read the study about how men take breakups harder than women, because women have another guy ready in waiting prior to a breakup, and just move on t…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 07:02 PM
2

What do you mean by "promote awareness?" and how does that apply to this particular story?
/r/MensRights22/01/15 07:37 PM
0

You think that's mean? You must not have watched much of this show, the UK or American version. This is also edited, so you don't see the entire conversation.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 11:02 PM
2

I don't think Feminism can make an argument without the words privilege or entitlement any more.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 10:50 PM
1

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: college, mostly liberal colleges these days, have become filled with naive people who go "this shouldn't be this way, they should make a rule that _____" and the idea is always fucking stupid. This would be a prime example.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 10:15 PM
5

Bahahaua! Now you have your rapper name. Nig-Squared, biotch?! Lol
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:08 PM
9

Have it done by choice. CHOICE. That's the point.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 12:01 AM
1

If you see guy pilled over on the side of the road and would normally ignore him but you wouldn't if he where a she then go help the guy out You think most men stop to help a woman who is pulled over on the side of the road? How many men out of 10? How many women would stop?
/r/MensRights15/01/15 09:25 PM
1

Like I said, it's not 100% or mutually exclusive, but the study I read said the majority of men are better at making mental maps and that woman are more inclined to navigate based on land marks.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 04:21 PM
9

I never said men can't be clueless too, but I remember reading things about this from legitimate studies. Men form mental maps, women use things like landmarks when navigating. Men have better spatial awareness. shrug
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:29 AM
–

I hate to stereotype, but this definitely happens too. Girls seem to have less awareness when it comes to things like that. They say men have better spatial relations in general so maybe it relates to that.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 09:51 PM
6

I don't think the point here is to be offended, the point is that it happened and society didn't give a fuck, while as if the roles were reversed Simpsons would have been attacked for months and possibly dropped.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:20 PM
0

You think in some cases due process is called for, while in other cases it's not. Link to me saying that? You think in some cases it's okay to take a person's past behavior into consideration, while in others it's not. Link to me saying that? You're either a teenager or have no education. You couldn't give me a foot up the ass with your logic with another 10 years of philosophy classes.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 03:14 AM
1

It sounds, actually it's quite obvious, you don't have an intelligently working brain capable of making logical distinctions. When a man is found running from the police, fleeing a murder scene covered in his wife's blood, or two individuals are chased by police from the site of a bombing and then have a shootout with the police, making up your mind about their guilt is a farcry from just accepting an allegation from someone about something that they claimed happened 25 years ago, but according …
/r/MensRights09/01/15 11:52 PM
0

you are okay with us each determining a verdict in our own mind Never said I wasn't. You again miss the point. before a trial begins or a jury renders a verdict. OJ went to trial. The boston bombers had legitimate violent conflicts w/police that they are already guilty of and ACTUAL EVIDENCE against them. I also never said you couldn't THINK they/he was guilty. Hmm...maybe a guy who does the shitty behavior has admitted to doing? Or am I using too much commonsense here? Hmmm....maybe a guy who h…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 11:43 PM
1

Ah, so because the judicial system isn't right 100% of the time we should just come up with our own conclusions before people even go to trial based on zero evidence. More great logic and question dodging. Why don't you tell me what has you convinced about Cosby that so obviously shows him as guilty as OJ or the Boston bombers.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:58 PM
2

You can't honestly believe this shit can you? Honestly tell me how old you are. The Boston Marathon bombers were spotted, identified, involved in a firefight with the police, a manhunt and captured and the trial is not so much to establish guilt, but to sentence. A case like this is a farcry from decades old accusations against someone with absolutely no evidence. People like you are EXACTLY why /r/mensrights argues for non-disclosure of names during cases like this, because people like you assu…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:12 PM
-2

The point about men's body issues is relevant, not their celebrity status as you brought it up. If you wanted to talk about their celebrity status, you should have brought up the fact that a woman can simply be born beautiful and make it on her looks, while a man has to spend a year working out to be taken seriously and discuss the differences between what a man vs. a woman has to achieve and how and why those standards developed, not the difference between the celebrity workout regime and the s…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:51 PM
0

The point you're trying to make was already made, and that's the point; that men's beauty standards/physique standards, require a lot more dedication and commitment and hard work to achieve. A woman can get breast implants with some money and some time, but a man can't get 50 pounds of muscle and 7% bodyfat without dedicating his entire lifestyle to it. Bringing up the issue of celebrities having the time and money to do so I don't think is very relevant, although true.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:36 PM
3

Lol! And your bias rears its ugly head. Someone upvote this as a prime example of yet another person not giving two shits about due process, slander or individual rights.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:30 PM
–

Just because you're talking about the same people doesn't mean you're contributing to the same discussion. And when we are talking about body image expectations related to women vs. men, how the fuck is it more important to keep in mind that they have an easier time of getting in shape than the average person...?
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:12 PM
2

Wow, you figured it out! Nice work. Apparently you finally read the article and realized that you saying "distancing yourself" from someone isn't quite the same thing as people protesting and trying to slander and destroy a person's career based on absolutely nothing but unproven accusations. Part of the MrM is discussing how false accusations in this country carry enormous weight with him, so much so that a person's reputation and career and life can be completely destroyed by one, even after g…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:10 PM
3

Look, whoever you are. I quoted your post, responded to it, responded to the rest of your posts and you don't fucking get it. Good luck to you. I don't have to go around to every person who is incapable of keeping up with me and downgrade my discussion to a level that they can understand. You have a horrendous premise and understanding of the entire situation to begin with, so the idea that you don't get what I'm saying is not unexpected. Other people understand, and if you don't get it, then to…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:28 PM
9

You're not sure the point he's making? Lol. I love when people sidestep the actual discussion to get on a soapbox about an entirely different issue; yes no fucking shit it's easier to find time and money to workout when you're rich and it's your job. :facepalm:
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:22 PM
2

Did you even read the fucking article or did you just start posting?
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:16 PM
1

You couldn't miss the point any more if you brought up baseball randomly.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:56 PM
3

Distancing or avoiding people is entirely different than going to find someone and yelling shit at them and seeking to further destroy their reputation. False accusations and their effect on men is one of the major issues we discuss here, and it's part of this thread, and here you are throwing your hands in the air. If girls hear shit about Cosby that makes them want to avoid him then fine. That makes perfect sense if the situation makes sense to them. If men and women want to continue speculati…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:32 PM
5

Innocent until proven guilty is regarding the state/government taking action, not the private sector. What is this supposed to mean? So regardless of whether or not you've gone to trial, or if you did go to trial, regardless of the verdict, we should still support people treating other people like shit based on their own presumptions and prejudice?...
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:11 PM
0

Uh, yes you absolutely should. You shouldn't judge people on things like their skin color or their heritage, but you should absolutely positively judge someone on their fucking behavior, are you insane?
/r/MensRights07/01/15 02:31 AM
9

This should be a meme under 1st world problems, but it is an actual modern Feminist issue. Lol.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 03:33 PM
5

There's another component to this as well that no one really mentions, and that's that Hollywood is FLOOOOODED with amazing looking young women. Having dabbled in modeling, and having worked in the film industry, I can tell you that there are absolutely stunningly gorgeous girls at the age of 14 who are trying to get into the industry. There are about 9 billion 18-26 year old gorgeous girls trying to get into the industry, and having cast plenty of women, women are just generally easier to cast …
/r/MensRights06/01/15 03:31 AM
0

Many of the things he mentions are not a result of hatred for women, but a result of men NEEDING to fulfill certain roles in human history such as providers and soldiers, and thus creating their own culturally specific methods of toughening up for those tasks.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 04:47 PM
0

Is this a serious post?
/r/MensRights31/12/14 02:19 AM
1

hahah I don't, but I have a feeling many towns are turning into this unfortunately. Especially if you have a liberal arts university in it.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 10:33 PM
1

Ridiculous. Don't start turning this sub into somewhere that will accept this drivel. I understand that many women in the 20-30 age group in the US right now are a pain in the ass. I have no interest in the women in my town for the most part, but I acknowledge that the US is 300 million + people and not all women are like the granola, hipster, ultra-liberal, impractical, annoying girls who live in my town. Don't start generalizing women in general and saying that you have to put up with women's …
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:46 PM
2

Oh and women with children are (apparently) more ok with rape then men childless women? I hate it when people read something and don't understand it, then make a point that is wrong and ask other, more intelligent people, to argue their horrendously wrong premise.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:14 PM
12

|they have helped create a world viciously and unfairly inimical to the interests of the person they most love – their boy – whom their tiresome campaigning will have stigmatised as a greedy, testosteronal, rapist-in-waiting. Best quote of the article
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:13 PM
1

College students have always been stupid and naive, and for the last several generations have been so left-wing that they become reactionaries. What scares me, though, is the number of people who take this ideology with them into the real world. this
/r/MensRights29/12/14 08:23 PM
12

Bill Burr is the man, I love his jokes. He talks about things most comedians don't.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:04 AM
8

It is. It would be terrible. Welcome to 'the patriarchy' rolls eyes
/r/MensRights28/12/14 04:41 PM
1

"Well other cancers exist too. By focusing on testicular cancer, you're negating the cancers that others have. That's cancerist." Terrible analogy. If you encouraged all cancer research funds to go to testicular cancer, denied the existence of all other forms of cancers, claimed the establishment was bias against testicular cancer and made up facts to support your side, stole money, attacked people who disagreed with you, were anti-intellectual etc. then yeah, you'd have a similar analogy. If yo…
/r/MensRights27/12/14 04:12 AM
2

If both genders have cultural issues that need fixing, then call yourself an Egalitarian, or a gender stereotype warrior, or a cultural fixer upper, or something. There's no reason to call yourself a Feminist, because simply by labeling yourself a Feminist you are negating the issues that men face, ignoring them, or placing them below women's issues, and that's sexist in itself. I'm not talking about the 3rd world either, I'm talking about the West.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 03:27 PM
1

It's also disingenuous for them to say that there isn't systemic sexism against men as well. exactly why FEMINISM doesn't need to exist, just like MANISM doesn't need to exist. MrM is basically a reactionary movement to the ills of Feminism and disregard for men in modern culture thanks to Feminism. Men face the same cultural and social prejudice, if you want to call them that, AND have disadvantages in the legal system and have the whole draft thing as well, the alimony thing, the child support…
/r/MensRights26/12/14 07:40 AM
1

There IS no good Feminism. There are no reasons to have Feminism in the US or the West. None. Zero. There are no rights women are denied that men have in the West. Zip zero. There is a reason for MANISM, but you won't hear me calling myself one or whatever. Feminism IS a hate group. Anyone who is a sensible Feminist is NOT a Feminist.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 06:47 AM
3

This is where you and I disagree. Potential allies who are dis-swayed by someone generalizing that Feminism sucks and Feminists are assholes, are never going to be 'allies.' Modern Feminism is a hate movement, pure and simple, and we aren't interested in having people who have never thought about their own beliefs join up with us, because they'll just start spewing more bullshit and making the MrM look stupid. Feminism needs to be destroyed, and I don't care how it's done, outside of using viole…
/r/MensRights26/12/14 06:30 AM
10

"well fuck them if they won't open their eyes or listen to my relevant points Yeah, that's what talking to Feminists and being banned from /r/feminism for voicing an opinion or posting actual legitimate statistics will do to you. No one listens to half of what we say anyway, so we can only focus on the people who actually do listen. Anita Sarkeesian has been debunked 90000 times, and look what she's doing. The 1/5 has been debunked 9000 times, the pay gap has been disproven since the 70s by peop…
/r/MensRights26/12/14 06:06 AM
7

Oh, well. If people want to be ignorant, let them. The people who read a single sentence and condemn an entire group of people aren't worth arguing with no matter what. They will never be convinced. Those people won't even bother visiting /r/mensrights and reading a single thing there
/r/MensRights26/12/14 05:42 AM
10

Modern day Feminists are for the most part due to the fundamental idea of calling oneself a feminist. I am concerned with men's rights, but I wouldn't classify myself as a manist, nor would I continue to associate with the MrM if it became a hate group, and the MRA subreddit distances itself from such people and does a lot of self policing to stop such talk. MRA is considered a hate group, as you claim, because of Feminist marketing tactics and bad press from those people.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 05:21 AM
0

Well I don't care then. I've made too many posts in here anyway. I tried to have a civil discourse with you, but all you care about is being 'right.' So go ahead and be right. If you actually care, it's clear what I mean in context of this discussion over the course of my replies.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 10:13 PM
0

I'm admitting, as I have already, that I should have rephrased my original point. I've admitted this multiple times, I really don't know how you're not getting this already.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 10:01 PM
0

do you think that was some kind of asshole retort? I was being serious, and I responded to those.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 07:25 PM
0

Why are you so set on fighting with this ridiculous argument? I haven't widened it ridiculously. Say you and I were sitting in a country that has Nuclear power for the last ten years, and then I said "There's never been a country with Nuclear power." Would you go "But this country has it!" or would you understand the point I was making? The point I was making was clarified many times in many of my posts. If you don't want to accept it or discuss it then move on. I'm not interested in having this…
/r/MensRights24/12/14 06:23 PM
-1

I have made more recent comments about universal suffrage in other countries and clarified, you're just chosing to ignore them.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:22 PM
-4

Are we arguing just to argue here? The Canadian said this to me I would point you to Canada (my country). Canada had women's suffrage by 1940, but didn't have universal suffrage until 1960. I don't know the details, but how does him saying that make it seem that men had voting free of requirements for a period of time before women? I said about 100 times which country type I was referring to and why. If you want to argue semantic details I don't care to. Universal suffrage exists in places now y…
/r/MensRights24/12/14 07:09 AM
-1

I just discussed Canada with someone else, and I just clarified to 1st world countries in my previous post, so if you could please just have a civil discourse without trying to let this devolve into some ridiculous argument I'd like that. The point I was trying to make when I said that was that if you have universal suffrage, but they don't count your votes, throw you out into the street, the prime minister goes over his term limits, the government takes your land and throws you into jail with d…
/r/MensRights24/12/14 06:49 AM
1

Right. Gotcha. Thanks :)
/r/MensRights24/12/14 06:30 AM
2

Interesting, well there has to be some kind of method for the government to know who is who and how to count votes. Maybe when you get a license or something they keep track of you, otherwise they wouldn't know how to send you a letter etc. Kinda cool though.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 06:26 AM
1

Surely you have to register to vote...
/r/MensRights24/12/14 06:20 AM
-3

Well it doesn't really matter if you can vote in a country where you have no rights, your vote doesn't matter, your property can be taken away from you at any time etc. etc., so yeah, I'm gonna limit it to the Western countries or really any country that could be considered 1st world. It looks to me like the countries you've listed were removing voting restrictions around the same time as giving women voting privileges, or simply passing a universal suffrage law, which is great. The point I was …
/r/MensRights24/12/14 06:20 AM
1

I dunno, educate me on Canadian voting requirements.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 06:14 AM
2

You gonna back that up with anything? I'm genuinely interested in knowing what Western country had universal suffrage without contingency for any lengthy period of time and wasn't instituted within the last couple decades.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 05:54 AM
29

Yet women claim their inability to vote was through pure oppression, when in reality, there has never been universal suffrage in any country. You've had to be a land owner, a soldier, signed up for the draft, aristocracy, etc.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 03:19 AM
3

More women have suicide "attempts" that aren't really attempts, ie. slight od from sleeping pills, poor job cutting their wrists etc. These are largely seen as cries for help and women are more likely to express such a thing, while men, tend to wait until things get really bad and do something that finishes the job, rather than use a suicide attempt as a cry for help.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 04:31 PM
9

It's not about infringing on men's rights blatantly. It's about the fact that the modern Feminist movement lies through their teeth and selectively chooses who and what to criticize, boycott, support, to fit their agenda, and exposing this is important, because the modern Feminist movement is still able to gain supporters no matter how ridiculous they are, cause harm, and the MrM is scoffed and laughed at by lots of people, simply because they buy into the modern Feminists' lies. Discrediting th…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 04:15 PM
1

A case by case basis huh? Just have no laws, just let the judge decide. You're ridiculous.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 02:02 AM
1

So your argument is that allowing teachers who are significantly older to sleep w/their students, we will decrease violence. And that a 13 year old is able to understand love, especially with a person of authority in their life.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 12:44 AM
5

Craig does that to be funny. He always does that. That's part of his schtick. Ridiculousness, tangents, and over the top stuff. She was trying to push his buttons and be funny, and none of it worked at all. It was awkward and cringe worthy whenever she spoke.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 09:35 PM
2

She was being comedic? Please.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 09:25 PM
7

I love how he doesn't even engage her. She's obviously sexist and stupid, but what's worse, she's not even funny.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 05:31 PM
4

Just because it's a natural instinct doesn't mean it should be done. It's natural for kids to want to drink, but they're not allowed. It's natural to want to fight, to sometimes kill, to harm, to burn someone's house down when they hurt you or your family, to fuck a million women and get them pregnant and walk away, to conquer countries, to enslave people, to torture. Doesn't make it right.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 05:26 PM
1

Same :( Morgan Webb probably wouldn't even talk this shit.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 04:45 PM
1

I dunno, he did another wig out at some convention recently too about this stuff. I think it was posted here as well. I couldn't believe it.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 03:18 PM
5

It seems so childish You explained it yourself. Stifling any real conversation about the content you created doesn't seem productive. They don't want productivity.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 07:05 AM
1

I did read it, and as I said, I'm not arguing the law with you, I'm arguing your interpretation of the situation with you, but you still want to argue the law, because you know your interpretation is wrong. If I point to your house and say "Brian and his 3 roomates raped me!" (even though there is no Brian who lives at that house) and it becomes an investigation and goes into print and suddenly everyone has labeled you as a rapist and is throwing stones through your house, is it really any diffe…
/r/MensRights18/12/14 10:47 PM
-1

I'm not disagreeing with the law, I'm disagreeing with your pulling hairs about what you think this girl actually did. You think that pointing a finger at a group of people and accusing them of something, even though you got the names wrong or completely made it up, isn't the same thing as pointing a finger at someone and getting their name wrong. So if my neighbors are pedophiles, and I accuse them all of molesting my son, but I say the guys name was Brian, and there's no Brian living there, th…
/r/MensRights18/12/14 09:31 PM
1

Are you joking?
/r/MensRights18/12/14 08:53 PM
10

I am so goddamn glad I have already finished college. Liberal universities are the plague now.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 04:23 AM
7

We shouldn't. We should raise awareness to issues and refute harmful gender myths propagated mainly by Feminism. Groups with 'agendas' end up going off the rails and turning into hate groups ie. feminism
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:01 AM
25

There are actually quite a lot of posts about male on female rape or DV. We discuss percentages, we discuss severity and media response, we discuss punishment. The thing we DON'T do, which Feminists DO, is use events to try and enact legislation or further some agenda. Feminists use every event they can as evidence to further their agenda. We use events like this as COUNTER examples do DISPROVE people with agendas.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 08:09 PM
10

Exactly. Same reactions as the girl got. If one is harassment, so is this. Neither is harassment though. And as a tall handsome man, I can confirm this happens to men as well. I've had some very strange approaches by women/girls as well, like being shouted at across restaurants, coming over and just sitting down at your table without asking, chatting you up at the register with a line full of people behind you. It happens to men and women, and saying it's 'harassment' is absurd.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:40 PM
3

Doesn't matter. Even if you get "YES LETS FUCK" from her, it doesn't matter. She will say she didn't say that, and you'll be fucked. You literally need shit in writing with people like this, and when the fuck is that going to happen?
/r/MensRights13/12/14 04:21 AM
1

How so? It took a lot of years of sexual activity for me to get to the point where I'd undress myself and she would undress herself before having sex. It's usually something of a mutual thing or initiated by someone, and I've been w/girls who actually get angry if I'm not initiating undressing them. Of course if she's blacked out drunk and he's tearing clothes off her like a dead body or a mannequin that's one thing.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 04:19 AM
2

I didn't say anything about the Earth being flat.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:18 PM
3

This. The 1 in 5 has been repeated so many times you might as well be telling people in the dark ages that the Earth orbits the Sun.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:09 AM
1

|These posts are highly offensive and wrong. The problems feminists are talking about are very real. What a crock. We've disproved basically every issue Feminism brings up that tries to act like it's unique to women, and this post is just so stupid and patronizing.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:32 AM
0

I guess you think fag still means cigarette in this country too. The term SJW was created for a reason, and it has a specific meaning. Just because you don't like that doesn't mean you can just negate that meaning and apply it to any single person with a concern over a social issue in the world -- which would mean every person alive.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 09:54 PM
0

Being concerned with social issues makes one a Social Justice Warrior. Wrong.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 09:45 PM
1

I'm not Partisan, and you're the one trying to apply the term to conservatives so you don't have to accept that SJWs primarily evolved out of the left/Liberals and you don't want to face that.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 09:45 PM
2

Lena doesn't also write/direct every episode of Girls on her own in a vacuum.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 05:23 PM
6

Seriously, she's fucking nuts. Absolutely fucking nuts.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 05:21 PM
1

I have gone over this. SJW arose as a term from 3rd wave femi-nazi's and hyperliberals. It comes from parading around like you're the nicest most moral person in the world with the best morality and the best beliefs, but then squashing and attempting to destroy any dissenting opinion, while still parading around saying how you want open discourse and discussion. It comes from ultraLib privileged college grads saying they believe in free speech and freedom, but they're actually Fascists who belie…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 05:15 PM
2

Of course a Liberal can not be a SJW. I never said all Liberals were SJWs, I said "all" SJWs were Liberals.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 05:12 PM
1

I've gone over it a couple times in this thread.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:35 AM
2

No. No it doesn't make any sense.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:31 AM
1

Sorry, but SJW's are from the liberal tradition. SJW's are pro-actively in peoples' faces about issues. This is way more of a Liberal thing than a Conservative or Right wing thing. The Tea-Party or anti-abortionists or anti-gays or whatever are generally just out there telling you why something is wrong ie. gay is a Sin, abortion is a sin or is murder, or voicing their economic views like everyone else without an education. SJWs have an appeal to morality concept on EVERYTHING in order to try an…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:12 AM
1

Not all Tea Party people are what you just listed, and that doesn't qualify as a SJW. Being concerned with issues that are societal does not a SJW make.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:33 AM
2

You checked maybe a page of my post history, cherry picked for your own agenda. The Tea Party are not SJWs. You don't understand how the term is used, you're just trying to apply it to them, because you don't want Liberal and SJW to be similar.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter