TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CMOS222 Archive

View 32 posts and 555 comments by CMOS222 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
442

CMOS222/r/MensRights21/12/12 10:01 AM
179

GeneralCMOS222/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:40 AM
178

CMOS222/r/MensRights17/09/14 01:13 PM
175

CMOS222/r/MensRights03/10/14 12:52 AM
142

CMOS222/r/MensRights31/01/17 04:09 AM
140

Edu./Occu.CMOS222/r/MensRights10/09/15 11:20 AM
93

Social IssuesCMOS222/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:56 AM
67

CMOS222/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:59 AM
65

Edu./Occu.CMOS222/r/MensRights15/09/15 10:47 AM
60

CMOS222/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:18 PM
60

CMOS222/r/MensRights19/07/16 11:32 AM
50

CMOS222/r/MensRights13/11/12 05:24 PM
41

CMOS222/r/MensRights12/01/13 11:06 AM
28

CMOS222/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:18 AM
28

CMOS222/r/MensRights26/07/16 04:44 AM
22

CMOS222/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:22 PM
20

CMOS222/r/MensRights20/04/13 06:12 PM
17

CMOS222/r/MensRights04/10/13 02:53 AM
15

CMOS222/r/MensRights13/08/12 02:38 PM
12

Raising AwarenessCMOS222/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:21 AM
12

Edu./Occu.CMOS222/r/MensRights10/09/15 11:14 AM
7

Edu./Occu.CMOS222/r/MensRights21/09/15 02:24 PM
6

CMOS222/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:38 AM
6

NewsCMOS222/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:18 PM
4

CMOS222/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:59 PM
3

CMOS222/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:40 AM
3

GeneralCMOS222/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:37 PM
0

CMOS222/r/MensRights18/08/12 04:51 PM
0

CMOS222/r/MensRights14/11/12 03:10 AM
0

CMOS222/r/MensRights15/05/13 01:54 PM
0

Blue Pill ExampleCMOS222/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 04:10 AM
0

CMOS222/r/MensRights25/11/13 06:13 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Let's be clear about something. Yes, there have been a lot of war movies in the 40s, 50s and 60s that pretty much neglected the actions and roles of women who took an active part in World War II; that is true. But as social attitudes have changed in the 70s to today, we have seen a lot more films that fill in this missing part of the story. But let's be very clear that, even with a movie like Dunkirk, war films that predominantly show the actions of men during one of the major events of World Wa…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 10:59 AM
2

You make a very good point. There has been some effort to do this, for example, American movies like the Tuskegee Airmen and the like...there was a link to a French movie about Algerian soldiers involved in World War II you might like, I will see if I can find it.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 10:47 AM
1

Thank you very much! :)
/r/MensRights04/08/17 10:41 AM
3

Regardless of the drinking age in Italy, your previous statement was a negative value judgement of Korean culture that both lacked context, and was out of context from my original statement. The topic of the thread was that the Korean Human Rights Commission ruled that a woman-only library is illegal. My comment was that Korea has done some interesting things (legally), in terms of gender equality/balance, which could be attributed to neo-Confucian values. Yes, you can take the 5th Amendment by …
/r/MensRights04/08/17 05:21 AM
3

It's not "neo-Confucian crap" because Confucianism has been part of Korea's culture for over 700 years. It's an integral part of Korea's culture and something that's much longer than the history of any North American civilisation. Confucianism is a key part of the cultures of a region spanning well over a billion people, and the modernization and development of any culture doesn't necessarily mean westernization. The Korean educational system instituted this quota system because they want to pro…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:21 AM
45

Korea has done some interesting things. About 8 years ago it passed a law mandating that all elementary schools must have a teacher staff of at least 10% men and 10% women. So, even in schools where the teaching staff are overwhelmingly female, at least 10% of the staff must be male, to serve as role models for male students, and vice-versa. I might be wrong, but I think the same holds true for high schools in Korea, which are segregated by gender. So in high schools for boys, at least 10 percen…
/r/MensRights03/08/17 12:21 PM
6

Regardless of whether you like or hate the film, in all fairness it is obvious that Ms. Jaye went through quite a psychological, and one could almost say existential, ordeal in researching this subject and presenting it in an organized, narrative fashion to make it comprehensible to viewers. She showed an incredible committment to the film-making and investigative journalism process, and I am sure there were times when, in the process of understanding and sorting competing narratives, she must h…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 12:03 PM
2

Well...regardless of any gender aspects of this story...if you want to push the envelope, fine. But sometimes the envelope pushes back. It sounds to me like Griffin, and perhaps some others, don't understand the origin of the metaphor "pushing the envelope". It first became known from the movie The Right Stuff where test pilots described putting new kinds of aircraft into operationally-dangerous maneuvers - against the recommendations of designers and engineers - in order to find the absolute li…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 02:58 AM
1

I have a teenage niece that loves baseball, she pitched two shutouts back-to-back on the weekend. I really wish we had a sports system in which people watched women's pro baseball as much as much as men's. There is a lot of subtlety and a little drama in baseball, and not all sports have to be about brutality. I wish she had the opportunities to go pro, and make as much money as male players do, if she wanted to.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 07:22 AM
1

I have a teenage niece that loves baseball, she pitched two shutouts back-to-back on the weekend. I really wish we had a sports system in which people watched women's pro baseball as much as much as men's. There is a lot of subtlety and a little drama in baseball, and not all sports have to be about brutality. I wish she had the opportunities to go pro, and make as much money as male players do, if she wanted to.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 07:20 AM

This is a strange - strange in the sense that the woman's responses are so illogical - but good example of how a lot of what passes for a desire for equality for women in the feminism movement actually ends up manifesting as self-defeating behavior. You brought up a good point about the wage disparities between male and female professional soccer players being attributable to the amount of sponsorship money each sport receives. So, the logical conclusion is that if we want female soccer players …
/r/MensRights14/05/17 12:53 AM
5

It doesn't benefit women only. As u/AlexanderSupersloth mentioned above, typically women in the developing world are responsible for collecting the household water, which takes a lot of hours out of their day. Making it easier and more convenient for women in the household to collect water benefits the whole family, male children and partners included. I've been a member of this forum from the time it had less than 10,000 members, and I am also a strong supporter of water.org, including being a …
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:41 PM
5

Good question!
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:23 PM

This is fairly easy to understand. Some people just can't wrap their heads around the idea that you can be for gender equal rights, but have serious reservations about, or even be against, feminism. During the Middle Ages in Western Europe, the Catholic Church asserted an absolute monopoly over how Christians established a relationship with God. Among the secular population, it was taken for granted that the only way to be a good, pious Christian was to be a good Catholic, and follow unquestioni…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 06:42 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 01:07 AM

I can understand a woman-only self-defense class and don't have any problems with it, but even assuming the organizers of this class have the best intentions at heart, there is an argument to be made for allowing the class to be open to males. It would provide sparring practice against a potential assailant of larger size. However, the title of the course, Rape Aggression Defense (R.A.D.) does tend to suggest that they have "an agenda", so to speak. I'm not sure what the difference is between "r…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 09:41 AM
10

Oh, I would love to be there to participate in this. I would so, so love to go into one of these booths and proclaim, "I love being male. Until I came to the University of Regina, I never really thought of myself as being privileged. But since I've come here, I've come to realize, yeah, I'm a white male. I'm priviledged. And I love it. It's so great being male. There are so many opportunities open to you, all spaces belong to you, everybody else looks up to you. I can understand how some people …
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:47 PM

Wasn't this first broadcasted on CBC about a year ago? I don't think this is a new broadcast.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 12:52 PM

Streep was wrong when she claimed Trump mocke a physically-challenged reporter. No, she wasn't: http://www.snopes.com/2016/07/28/donald-trump-criticized-for-mocking-disabled-reporter/ Streeps claims were accepted immediately, and when adherents were shown they were wrong the backfire effect was evident. Wrong again. Streep's speech was immediately researched to see if it was true. If Streep had been male and found to be in error, the reaction would have been muted but the false claims would have…
/r/MensRights26/02/17 01:06 AM

Why on earth is this in r/mensrights? What has this got to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights16/11/16 02:34 AM
24

OOp. Somebody isn't getting enough attention this month...
/r/MensRights03/11/16 04:14 PM
3

Bored bus driver in a low-status position in life suddenly gets an attack of white-knightis, doesn't check company policy, just "decides" what the "right thing to do" is, and humiliates a person with a disability. Say goodbye to your job, asshole, I hope the feeling was worth it.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 06:33 AM

"In recent months, Haglin claims, she’s been fired from her job and forced to work as a stripper using the nom de stage “Bambi.”" Ms. Haglin, a couple of points: I can't see...how being a registered sex offender would prevent employment as a stripper. I think if someone was charged with a sex crime...the last kind of employment one would choose would be as a stripper. I'm pretty sure there are plenty of other possible job positions available for someone who has been charged but not yet convicted…
/r/MensRights23/10/16 01:31 PM
13

If there is an MRA group at Duke, they should start a "Duke Women's Project", with all the right paperwork, policy statements, and infrastructure, to give women students a 'safe space' to “critique and analyze their own femininity and toxic femininities to create healthier ones.” See how that goes over.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 03:45 AM

This story has been posted to r/mensrights three times already: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=Jade+Hatt&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all
/r/MensRights17/09/16 02:54 PM

Where is the outrage from the feminist community? If there is any, it's somewhere in the past. The story is from December 2015.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 02:52 PM
3

The thing is, when you stop and step back for a moment, what's the most appropriate response to give to something like this. Let's look at the presumptions behind this statement a little closer: First of all, this so-called advice is clearly not meant to be helpful. To men, women, anyone. It's condescending to men, masquerading as relevant advice. We know this because it presumes that no men do anything of any use to women, which is a ridiculous presumption. It presumes that the definition of be…
/r/MensRights11/09/16 10:54 AM
1

I wonder how many times she's said that to Bill Clinton?
/r/MensRights11/09/16 04:29 AM
3

What's really amazing about this is that every mature adult learns, at a certain age, that nobody owes their attention to you. Regardless of whether or not you are male or female, regardless of the person next to you is male or female. Odell Beckham Jr. could have had something on his mind, he could be worried that he forgot to do something, he could have been thinking about the plays he made in his last game or thinking about his next game, he could have had an upset stomach or a practice injur…
/r/MensRights03/09/16 03:11 AM
1

I can under...well, tolerate...if people have different perspectives on things like the Jian Ghomeshi trial or the presumption of innocence. But what gets me is the last line of the article. "The panel discussion is not open to the public." Like, WTF? I'm presuming this organization has gotten government money to organize this conference, and it's being hosted at a university - a government-funded, public institution - yet they are closing their panel discussion to the public. And (presumably) p…
/r/MensRights27/07/16 06:24 AM
3

The amazing thing is that for most people, goes without saying that justice is axiomatic on the burden of proof. You simply cannot have one with out the other, any more than you can have gravity without mass.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 10:10 AM
2

If you're not Catholic, you're not a christian.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:43 AM
1

My favorite nitwit argument along these lines is the one, "You're a rapist. And the fact that you deny being a rapist, proves that you're a rapist." My favorite response: "Well in that case, you are not a human being, you're a horse. And the fact that you deny being a horse, proves that you're a horse."
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:12 AM
0

I'm no expert on the subject of online bullying or twitter abuse...but I find the image used in this article to be rather bizarre. A woman in her 20s is crouching on the floor, with a computer monitor looming over her...yes, online slander and libel should be vigorously stamped out and prosecuted if necessary...but when it comes to simple bullying, name calling, or abuse...shouldn't we also be teaching everyone, men and women, to toughen up a little bit? If someone calls you an asshole or a cunt…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 05:31 PM
1

From an economic viewpoint, people are valued according to what they can and do contribute to an enterprise, project or company, and to a great extent that valuation is largely independent of the individual's self-estimate. Some people have suggested that stay-at-home homemakers should be paid for their household work. They may feel that way, but the question arises, who is going to pay for it? In terms of value in society however, that is something that can be based more on self-estimate. If yo…
/r/MensRights15/04/16 11:45 PM
4

Reading the title of this article is like watching a klutz with an armful of china plates trip and go flying. Nobody on this forum or any other forum has ever said anything bad about transgendered.people. In contrast, a small minority of self-identifed feminists are anti-transgender. A significant number of transgendered people are MRAs. The Matrix has no explicit feminist or MRM themes or content whatsoever, as far as I can recall.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 10:38 PM
2

Not a word of support, or condolence, anywhere in that whole article, for the 19 year-old woman who was allegedly assaulted by the the accused.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 05:48 AM
5

...get OVER yourself...
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:26 PM
1

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights03/02/16 01:08 AM

I think you might be right. Perhaps this forum is being adulterated by anti-MRAs trying to make us look bad?
/r/MensRights02/02/16 12:59 PM

What has this got to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights02/02/16 01:05 AM
18

Things you could consider doing: File a complaint of police misconduct with the local police department. Mention in the complaint that the officer in question treated you inappropriately by saying "he'd remember me if I ever tried anything again." Make him explain in writing exactly what this statement means, what specific retributions he was alluding to, and what he meant by "If you try anything 'again'". Demand an interview with the officer and his supervisor, and explain your side of the stor…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:25 PM
5

Objection 1: I'm tired of all the talk about gender and transgender. Why should the world have to adapt to this tiny minority? Answer: Take a deep breath, friends, and let yourself flow calmly into the future. Once people are treated with respect regardless of their gender identity, there will be less need to discuss it. No. Wrong. Objection 1 is absolutely right. Of course, people who are transgender should not be discriminated against...but by the same token, people who are perfectly comfortab…
/r/MensRights29/01/16 02:02 PM
1

"If you're not a feminist then you're a misogynist." The short answer: "That's like telling a Christian that if they're not Roman Catholic, they're an atheist." The long answer: There was once a time in European history when the Catholic church claimed a monopoly on the definition of a person's relationship to God. The Catholic church decided what a good Christian was, what a good Christian amounted to, and that anyone claiming to having a relationship with God outside the definitions prescribed…
/r/MensRights29/01/16 01:51 PM

She seems to be a narcissist in more ways than one. As curlytoot noted above, she gave tickets to a Broadway play to him as a Christmas present. Using her father's credit card. After they broke up, she had her father falsely report the tickets as stolen, so that he could not attend the play. Unless I am mistaken, under federal or state law this is criminal fraud. Curlytoot did not steal the tickets. However, Curlytoot's ex felt perfectly entitled to lie to her father's credit card company just t…
/r/MensRights23/01/16 04:44 AM

Well, after the fight I linked above on Imgur, I got this text. I had the physical tickets, but it didn't matter; she cancelled them. EDIT: cancel that, DON'T talk to her about it - see my PM.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 04:37 AM
13

One of the things I really appreciate about this forum - although I don't always agree with some of the directions it goes in - is how it's given ordinary, thinking people the ability and opportunity to develop their argumentation and reasoning skills - solid, consistent, patient skills - in defending their personal beliefs. For most people who believe in equal rights and male self-esteem, this wasn't possible in most social situations 10 or even 5 years ago. What I really liked about this dialo…
/r/MensRights23/01/16 04:06 AM
3

I think this comes under the category of what Bill Mahler calls "making women nod". In reality, it amounts to the stupid talking to the stupid.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 06:55 AM
33

frombolognaa, When I first joined this forum about 3 years ago, membership was around the 9,000 mark. It's now up to 123,000 and rising. That level of membership can't all be men. There are a substantial number of women who feel the same way as you do, and their numbers are increasing every day. You are not an outsider, and you never have been. You've just always been way ahead of the curve.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 05:29 AM
9

Does anyone really think every parent is entitled to a fifty-fifty presumption of custody and time sharing? ** raises hand tentatively ** Um...well...in the absence of specific evidence showing it would be harmful...well, YES.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 05:24 AM
4

If it's not too late, tell the boss that you have a medical condition that leaves you in a state of chronic pain. A mild condition of Crohn's disease or something similar. As a result you don't feel much like talking to people, and that your "bad disposition" is simply because you are distracted by your chronic pain. They mean nothing to you, so why not lie to them? As you said, you don't owe them an explanation, if you are doing your job and doing it well, that's all the company is entitled to …
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:48 PM
2

Be my guest! Let me know what sort of response you get. :)
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:30 AM
30

A comment on how the MRM is perceived that I made a while back; at the risk of repeating myself, I'll post it again here: Whenever I hear somebody say, "Feminism is concerned with men's rights too", I realize that the speaker is speaking with a different set of assumptions than I have. Namely, the assumption that feminism is a necessary prerequisite for gender equality, and that feminism is a necessary prerequisite for male equality. In fact, I would go so far as to say that they suffer from a p…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 09:34 AM
3

I think throughout human history, in every society there have been individuals who have decided that a relationship with the opposite gender is simply "not worth it". It was much less acceptable in the past; even up until the 1970s in most western societies it was expected that everyone "had" to get married, if you didn't there was something "lacking" about you. I think this has always been as much true for women as well as men. And certain occupations such as the convent, the priesthood, etc. a…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 01:49 AM
3

Jeduits, In addition to the other suggestions posted here, I strongly recommend you write a letter to the editor of your local newspaper outlining the details you have mentioned above, and how you, as a private citizen and father of two children, was harassed in a public park. Include enough details so that the woman who harassed you - as well as the bystanders who watched - will be able to recognize the incident. I think you should do everything you possibly can to make this woman, as well as t…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 03:00 PM

Wait a minute. Holly Baxter, in the article above, describes herself as a female journalist. But she spells "farcical" as "farcicle"? What professional journalist worth their salt makes a spelling mistake like this?
/r/MensRights19/11/15 01:18 PM

Hmm. She meets a "country music star" once and immediately falls in love/imagines she is in love with him. Wants to unload her husband of 8 years immediately. Not a thought or a mention of what consequences her actions would have on her kids. Then claims husband has abused her for years. Which, if true, raises the question of why she tolerated it UNTIL she met said country music star. What difference does that make? Why didn't she leave him beforehand? What's the connection between meeting said …
/r/MensRights15/11/15 08:29 AM

Are you in grade school, or university? If you are still in grade school...record every comment she says along these lines. Note the date, time, and if possible record the comment. Save them all up. After you graduate from high school, and then maybe from university, sue her ass. Sue her for creating a hostile learning environment during the time you were in school, for you and for every other male student that suffered under her. Take her car, her house, every dime she has in savings.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:51 PM
2

You cut him off. After he calls out "cheap", you stop, walk back to him slowly, look him in the eye and say, "You're just a cashier. You don't get to do that. My relationship with my girlfriend is none of your business. My relationship with my girlfriend is not part of your job, so you don't get to talk to customers that way. If you dislike that fact, it's your own fault for not having either the intelligence or the ambition to get a better job."
/r/MensRights08/11/15 11:56 AM
11

"I'm developing web-based approaches to preventing sexual assaults on college campuses." Well to her credit, at least now we know who is the asshole who is making all these bullshit multiple choice "education programs" that the universities are forcing freshman males to fill out, on the threat they won't be able to register for courses next year if they don't. And I'll bet she's making a bundle of money conning the universities into buying her "online education programs". To Reddit's credit as w…
/r/MensRights06/11/15 04:50 AM
16

It's the Middle Ages. The Catholic Church to Martin Luther: "Anyone can talk about their relationship to Christ and their interpretation of the Bible, as long as you do it within the context of the Catholic Church and maintain a Catholic focus." It's the 21st Century: "It's important to any human being that experiences domestic violence, as long as the response is within the context of feminism."
/r/MensRights24/10/15 02:29 PM

raises hand timidly Um...is it at all appropriate to point out to these self-appointed social justice warriors... The MAIN reason why people - male or female - go to university is to get an education...not sex?
/r/MensRights17/10/15 10:01 AM
5

Simple tech solution. Spring-mounted toilet seats. Seat stays in the up position, pull it down when you want or need to sit. Your ass keeps the seat down, until you stand up. The spring slowly returns the seat to the upright position.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 04:43 PM
10

To a certain extent - a small extent - I feel sorry for this woman. She committed these crimes partly - a small part - because society has not done enough to signal to women that teacher-on-student rape is a crime that is morally unacceptable and should/will be severely punished. The fact that a female teacher would even consider raping an underage student (regardless of whether or not he desired it) shows more has to be done to make it obvious to all that it can't be allowed. Lenient sentences …
/r/MensRights07/10/15 05:13 AM
2

This story is fun to think about on so many levels. If the genders were reversed, and a 21 year-old male babysitter had sex with an 11 year-old girl, would he be spared jail time because the girl was "totally up for it" and regarded the experience as "a notch on her belt"? By taking the 11 year-old boy's feelings on the experience into account, isn't the judge saying that 11 year-old boys have the same level of emotional maturity as 21 year-old girls? Isn't this sexist against women? Bizarre...
/r/MensRights06/10/15 04:46 AM
3

I know. On the one hand she tells girls to "go out there and excel" and her personal example of "excelling" is marrying and becoming a stay-at-home mom and subordinate to someone who is clearly smarter, more talented, and more ambitious than her. She's so stupid she couldn't find her rectum with a road map.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 11:15 AM
-1

Really? Could you tell us more about what happened? In that case I take back my previous comment. I didn't realize this was still a current problem.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 02:14 AM
-5

Dude, this is how it works. Media reports an issue or incident that is patently unfair to males. Issue negatively affects an agency or company, and they change their policies. Can you cite a recent (i.e., this year) example of where an airline refused to seat a child next to a male passenger?
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:09 PM

Another 3 year old article.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 11:19 AM

“Though they hide behind a thin veneer of real issues, just below the surface is a vile and vicious misogyny,” Look who's talking!
/r/MensRights15/09/15 10:35 AM
10

I can't help but wonder about the timing of all this. The death threat comes right at the beginning of the semester, as classes come back in session...and just in time for a group of U of T women hold a rally and blame the death threat on men's rights activists. Isn't it reasonable to assume that this death threat might have been orchestrated by a pro-feminist person at U of T? Perhaps even by one of the women speaking at or participating in this rally? After all, if they are willing to stoop to…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 10:34 AM
9

Too late. As u/M4Strings and u/5th_Law_of_Robotics indicate, millions of vibrators are produced and sold every year, but vibrators are a kind of sex robot. The barn door on sex robots has been open for years. But you haven't seen all the men out there rush to have them banned because they are "demeaning to men". And in any case, a law banning sex robots is not only unworkable, it's just as "unnecessary" and "undesirable".
/r/MensRights15/09/15 02:41 AM
1

Folks, c'mon. If we're going to expect women to come around to our viewpoints and respect men's rights, we're gonna have to respect the rights of women to shoulder equal roles and responsibilities of men, even in traditional arenas like the military. The IDF has figured out how to integrate women into combat roles, why wouldn't we expect this to be possible in the Marines? Yes, I did not read the article. I don't see how it's a men's rights issue. In it's wisdom, the US military has decided to i…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 10:55 AM
1

In that case, the President should be able to expel a Member of Congress when he/she is only 20% sure the senator/representative took a bribe.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 06:17 AM
0

I don't really see this as being much of a men's rights issue. The US Army and Marines are only now starting to integrate women into combat units, and it will probably take a few years for the management kinks to be worked out. Something similar probably happened when the forces were integrated in the 1950s. If the IDF figured out how to integrate women into front line combat forces, I don't see any reason why it couldn't happen in Western countries...nor do I see it having any kind of adverse e…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 06:14 AM
8

Authorities said samples that do not match the DNA found on the victim will be destroyed. BULLSHIT they will. DNA samples end up in a database sooner or later, regardless of what the authorities "say" will be done with them. EDIT: I didn't realize this story was from 2014, so I retract my statement above. I have no idea what has happened with the DNA samples.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 11:50 AM
8

The very bottom of the story also said: The investigation found that over a five-year period, more sexual assaults were reported to Ryerson University in Toronto than any other university or college in Canada. When the data is adjusted for population, Acadia University had the highest number of reports. (my italics) I noticed this press release from Acadia University back in February in which Acadia refutes the information in a CBC story about sexual assaults. I can't help but wonder if the CBC …
/r/MensRights10/09/15 11:41 AM
7

Boy, the fall university semester has just started and the double standards are racking up early. I have no problem with the police or RCMP withholding the alleged victim's identity until after trial, but why the double standard for the alleged assailant? The press got the alleged assailant's name from court records. Unfortunately for this university year, I think things are going to get worse for male students before they get better. EDIT: I did a search for the alleged assailant's name, and th…
/r/MensRights10/09/15 11:24 AM
3

IMHO, sexuality is similar to handedness. For whatever reason, the majority of the population in most societies is right handed, and in most societies left handedness runs about 10%. Now, handedness is not genetically determined (as far as I know), nor is it inherited. But sometime after birth, some 'switch' in the brain gets set so that an individual prefers to use one hand more than the other for most tasks. It might even be reasonable to say that the hand is the "hardware" and handedness is t…
/r/MensRights09/09/15 02:53 PM
23

Although I don't condone what the students did, I'm not surprised they did it. Making attendance at a student-written play (how are the writers of this play either experts on sexual assault or on Title IX) smacks of hate week in the book 1984. There is no clear connection between a student-written play and an education as to the understanding of a student's requirements under either Title IX or sexual assault law. It's also not clear why the students needed to be physically present in order to s…
/r/MensRights09/09/15 11:03 AM
374

I disagree with the suggestion that the way genders have been treated in the past should have any bearing on how gender equality is defined in the present. The basic problem with arguing that "discrimination A" is justified by thousands of years of "discrimination B" is that there are an infinite number of "historical injustices" in the historical record. Within the living memory of most of the people on this forum, blacks and gays were discriminated against. In the 1940s, Japanese-Americans wer…
/r/MensRights08/09/15 09:43 AM

Fortunately most people nowadays would agree that this - and people like her - belong in r/wtf.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 04:19 AM
1

Dear gawd. He's turned himself into a tampon vending machine. Worse than a vending machine, he carries them around for free. Now. Everybody stop for a moment. Ask the nearest female to you how she would feel if all men carried tampons and sanitary napkins, and how she would feel if she needed one, and a total (male) stranger on the street walked up to her and said, "I have Always Ultra and Stay-Free Mini-pads. Which do you need?"
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 12:13 PM
2

...Herodotus...Plato...Aristotle...Xenophon...Plutarch...Cicero...Varro...Horace...St. Augustine... ...Francis Bacon...Dante...Cervantes...Chaucer...Snorri Struluson...Shakespeare...Newton...Euler...Leibnitz... ...Gutenberg...Luther...King Sejong the reat...Euclid...Erasmus...Machiavelli...Rabelais...Copernicus...Galileo... Descartes...Milton...Voltaire...Swift...Defoe...Fielding...Rousseau...Goldsmith...Goethe...Burns... ...de Balzac...Dostoyevsky...Tolstoy...Flaubert...Turgenev...Zola...Conrad…
/r/MensRights02/09/15 11:13 AM
2

Yeah, right. My worth adds up to the quality of sperm I produce for people who I don't even know and couldn't care less about me. Also, is she serious? If only 6 men in the UK are "eligible" to be included in the so-called "national sperm bank", it sounds to me like UK men are doing the right thing. Who knows what child support laws will be like in 20 years...why would I risk the potential liability?
/r/MensRights02/09/15 05:13 AM
2

The Washington Examiner article above is a bit messed up in the formatting, there is an easier to read version here: http://www.richmond.com/news/local/education/article_f8382db0-072d-5d58-947d-5cddb1084213.html
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:25 AM
1

Exactly why I consider myself, not an atheist, not an agnostic, but a Non-theist. It's not that I want to deny the existence of God, I'm denying there's even a debate. There is no debate. Debating it, in and of itself, makes it true on some level. Good idea! :)
/r/MensRights30/08/15 03:16 AM
7

This is a good post, but IMHO, I think there is a deeper psychological process going on when a misandrist asks, "What have men ever done for society?" that people who hear the question may be missing. I don't know if I am articulating this very well, but there is a strange phenomenon that happens when people ask questions like this. Imagine for a moment that you're standing at the top of a desert dune with someone, and they ask you, "Where is the sand?" Since there is sand all around, the questi…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:20 AM
1

Showing on mine ok, and I'm not subscribed to 50 subs.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 01:37 AM
1

I'm having a little trouble understanding the issue/question...is the writer suggesting that if person A files a sexual assault complaint against person B, and B denies the accusation and sues A for defamation, then the university should protect A from being sued? If that's what the writer is suggesting, then I see an obvious issue: universities don't - and shouldn't - have the power to restrict or prevent a person's right to go to court to apply for redress.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:25 PM

The article is dated 2009.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:11 PM
1

I can't recall hearing of any case where a man was put in jail simply for leaving his spouse and children. Nor do I know of anyone who thinks the father should be placed in jail if a couple splits. There are plenty of cases where the courts have placed unduly burdensome child support requirements on fathers, yes.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 02:46 AM
2

As someone who follows the MRM, I absolutely believe in the right of women to have comprehensive access to abortion and family planning services. It would be nice to be able to say that men should have absolutely equal say in whether or not a pregnancy should be terminated, but in reality, pregnancy has a greater health and biological effect on the female than on the male. Men's rights are part of human rights, and the rights of women who become pregnant but do not want to carry a fetus full ter…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 02:14 AM

What has this got to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights23/08/15 02:06 AM
1

Some provincial health care systems in Canada are moving to do this, others are not moving fast enough. What is clear is that some boys will needlessly experience throat cancer in their lives because the health care system is not moving fast enough to do this. And the savings to the health care system by preventing those cancers and the cost of treatment by early HPV vaccination for boys will more than make up for the cost of vaccinating the entire population of boys. The health care treatment o…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 01:21 AM

Jared Fogel has been charged with 1 count of travel to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a minor and one count of distribution and receipt of child pornography. And yes, I think if it was a famous female spokesperson convicted of the same crimes, she would go to prison.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 02:19 PM
3

And I really don't understand the university's responses to this. Why not simply adopt a policy that all sexual assault allegations will be promptly turned over to the local police, on the grounds that the latter have the investigatory experience to best handle said allegations. And if the Department of Education threatens to withhold funding from universities for not having a campus policy, respond that this is their campus policy. The other big problem with this is that the Department of Educa…
/r/MensRights20/08/15 11:47 AM
1

I think you're probably right. In child custody cases, there sometimes seems to be an underlying current or theme that women have a certain amount of "life and death power" over the children they bring into the world, and perhaps this had some influence over the judge's decision to return the third son to her custody.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 03:59 PM

Ah, I didn't see that part in the article. Thanks I appreciate it!
/r/MensRights19/08/15 04:58 AM

This is a very tragic story, but what does it have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights19/08/15 04:50 AM

Let's open a bigger can of worms. I propose that the genetic origin of all children must be a matter of public record. Make it law so that before any registry of births issues a birth certificate, it must first receive the results of a genetic test attesting to the parentage of the child. Full name of each biological parent. And that the resulting birth records be searchable by any member of the public, just like a title search or a credit history search. The result? Paternity fraud would be wip…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:14 PM

It's called "moving the goalposts". Remember back when the majority of university students were men? Imagine if someone said "but this is balanced out when you include women in nursing and hairdressing type programmes".
/r/MensRights17/08/15 02:33 AM
8

"A pig gone adrift." So if I "behave" the way this commercial wants me still, I'm still a pig, just not so "adrift." Guy should have slapped the shit out of her as soon as she said that.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 04:35 PM
1

One thing you can do is go into your preference and browse at a different vote threshold. Thanks, I didn't know about that. No. This is not a news sub. This is an activism sub, and if you read the rules on the side you will see there really aren't a lot of rules - right or wrong. Right, but arguably, you become most effective as an activism sub when you use the most current information available on an issue.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 02:20 AM
4

It gets really complicated, doesn't it. The thing that I found most interesting was how the article makes a distinction between what he thinks society expects of him vs what society actually expects of him. So how do you sort out the effects on men's health and psychological well-being from self-imposed expectations vs expectations imposed by society? And the degree to which the two are interrelated? My takeaway from this is that men like the guy in this article need to start learning to open th…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 06:07 PM

Seven years ago, same-sex marriage was illegal in the US. A lot can happen in seven years. And if you're going to get the courts and the general public to agree that women should get equal sentences as men for the same crime, doesn't it make more sense to provide the public - as well as the members of this subreddit - with the most current examples? And let's face it: the only reason why you posted this story is because of the brutality of the crime committed, not because it's a typical example …
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:17 PM

Well for one, two males were victimized brutally at the hands of their mother and a bunch of other women. Thank you. I suspect that the vast majority of women and mothers in the world, if asked, would find this appallingly deplorable as well, but thank you.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:10 PM

So again, you didn't read the whole story. And what has this got to do with men's rights in the first place? Seven years ago: Kung Fu Panda Oil is $100 a barrel Subprime mortgage crisis Bill Gates steps down from MicroSoft Beijing Summer Olympics First Chinese manned space mission Barack Obama elected President of the US Bernie Madoff arrested
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:02 PM
-6

Well, I'm glad to hear that shared parenting and alimony/child support reform have moved steadily through the courts, and all of these absurd laws eliminated despite the opposition of feminists. Thanks for the heads up! But that's something else you don't know, because you don't know what happened in the Brendan Fraser story since 2012. Which you would have known, if you had read the story. What's the point of arguing about laws or court cases that may have already changed?
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:52 PM

You just posted another article from seven years ago.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:48 PM

The date. Is at the top of the page.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:46 PM
-16

That's beside the point. You don't know what's happened since the original story. It may very well be that the court agreed with Fraser and cut his support payment obligations. Therefore posting the story, as is, is misleading. You yourself admitted that you didn't know the story was two years old. Which means you didn't read the whole story.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:42 PM
-20

You don't know what's happened in the Brendan Fraser court case since 2012. The court may have agreed with his argument and reduced his child support payments. So your posting of this article is misleading the subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:34 PM
-5

This article is from 2008.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:30 PM
-21

Like you probably did, I looked and didn't find one. Why are you posting two year old articles in the first place?
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:27 PM
2

Mods would you please consider deleting this, it's got nothing to do with the purpose of the subreddit and appears to be merely commercial spam.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 01:58 PM
15

This post is two years old.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 01:44 PM
6

I wouldn't exactly call this giving boys a positive impression of marriage as an avenue for personal growth. The little girl is encouraged to think of marriage as a way of pushing a boy's buttons and exerting control over the boy, the boy is left with the impression that marriage is something he has to enter into whether he likes it or not, and the mother reinforces the impression by thinking it's funny and laughing at the boy's distress.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 09:47 AM
2

Yup. In fact, there is nothing about this woman's actions that are in any way anti-male. She's addressing a development issue. In some developing regions of India, poor women have little access to feminine hygiene products, and consequently can suffer reduced quality of life, reduced economic and social opportunities, and personal embarrassment. As a man and an MRA, would you want your daughter, mother or younger sister to go without these products? I seem to recall reading an article a few year…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:29 AM
2

You have a point there. And, in fact she is doing men a favor by being so candid with her opinions. But, WADR, I'm not that big a believer that people's choices in relationships are driven by "instincts". I acknowledge that The Selfish Gene has become widely read and influential in people's thinking about sexual behavior and relationship strategies, but I find a lot of evolutionary psychology amounts to moving from preconceived notions to foregone conclusions. Like the protagonist in Gattaga, I …
/r/MensRights14/08/15 01:00 PM
1

I see no reason to alter my original statement. Thanks for your input, anyway.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:58 PM
3

I agree, her honesty is commendable, but I find her comments/opinion somewhat deficient in that she doesn't articulate what she or other young women have to offer, or should offer, in a relationship.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 11:39 AM
4

Fair Wind's comments in the screenshot above - assuming she is actually telling the truth - are to a certain extent commendable because she is at least speaking the truth about what she wants out of a long-term heterosexual relationship. She's describing what she wants and expects from the group of available men from which she would like to choose a permanent partner. I don't see anything wrong with that, she's clearly thought in detail about what she wants in a relationship, which means she doe…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 11:24 AM
2

I think part of the problem is that the so-called "progressive movement", does, as you say, automatically label or condemn anyone who disagrees with them, and don't allow for the possibility that people can be uncertain on an issue, conflicted on an issue, or still working out the issue in their own minds. I first heard about SSM as a concept about 20 years ago, when I heard it presented and discussed by a Canadian MP Svend Robinson. To be honest, I felt uncomfortable with the idea for several y…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 04:42 AM
1

If I were to stop and and think about it, I'd have to say I've been an MRA for at least 20 years or more. I can recall some particular incidents, some in college, some after college, that made me think there is a disconnect going on between what some people in society call "equality" and how said people practice the opposite. I think the thing that really "woke me up" in a metaphorical sense/Neo wakes up sense was a TV program called Home Improvement, that starred Tim Allan. Although it's premis…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 04:29 AM
1

I agree. I started this thread because I'm somewhat puzzled as to why, over the past three years I've been a visitor here, the question "Is the MRM open to gay men?" keeps coming up: https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/14l2ss/gays_in_the_mrm/ https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/u0zyp/how_do_you_feel_about_gay_rights_mras/ https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/bf4p0/are_gay_rights_a_mens_rights_issue_or_not/ https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/38fvku/do_mras_support_…
/r/MensRights08/08/15 08:36 PM
1

Probably a good idea. :)
/r/MensRights08/08/15 11:42 AM
3

Not quite sure what you are trying to say here... In any case, this post wasn't/isn't directed to SWJs at all. I intended it for visitors to this forum who may have been given an incorrect description of the MRM; gay men interested in men's issues in particular.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 04:39 PM
1

Good idea!
/r/MensRights07/08/15 04:36 PM
5

Actually, now that I think of it, you're right. It's "SWJ-speak". My bad. Should have found a better way to express it.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 01:24 PM
3

You to walk up to the booth, smile, and say, "Hi"... ...then smack one of the people behind the desk across the face. Say, "Thank you, I enjoyed that." and walk away. If they complain, just look confused and respond with, "But your sign says free slaps for cis-gendered and white males. It doesn't say to cis-gendered and white males." Then go tell five "cis-gendered white male" friends about it.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 11:52 AM
5

:-)
/r/MensRights07/08/15 11:47 AM
1

Well, I've been seeing these posts for a while now, and almost all of them seem to be pretty respectful and not aggressive or condescending. I think they are mostly people who don't know much about the MRM, are curious about it and wondering what it's perspectives are on issues of concern to gay men.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 10:53 AM
1

Gotcha, yeah we are.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 08:31 AM
37

I think the best thing to do would be to walk up to the booth, smile, and say, "Hi"... ...then smack one of the people behind the desk across the face. Then say, "Thank you, I enjoyed that." and walk away. If they complain, just look confused and respond with, "But your sign says free slaps for cis-gendered and white males. It doesn't say to cis-gendered and white males." Then go tell five "cis-gendered white male" friends about it.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 08:29 AM
2

This is exactly why it's ridiculous to compare these women to the supposed rape victims of today like Emma Sulkowicz. Yes, that's true, and I don't. "Celebrating" victimhood, changing it into something to be admired and aspired to because of the attention it gives, you, is morally repugnant. In a sense, to do so is to profit from the real sexual assaults that many people have suffered.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:45 PM
2

Well, I was speaking specifically about situations where the assault was committed by a famous or well-respected member of the community, not assaults committed by someone from a middle- or lower-class demographic. I think also that for some rape victims there was an ingrained bias or self-restraint against reporting a famous or well-connected person...perhaps out of fear of the assailant's social power, perhaps a kind of "self-gaslighting", or they persuaded themselves that even if they reporte…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:42 PM
-1

In fairness, 30 or 40 years ago it was a lot more difficult for a woman to report a rape and expect to be treated seriously, especially if the alleged offender was a famous or influential member of society. It was just as difficult, if not more so, for victims of pedophilia at the hands of members of the Catholic clergy or people like Jimmy Savile. Society had a vested interest in believing these people to be likeable, charismatic people, and they avoided the emotional effort of changing their v…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 11:37 AM
2

Agreed. I think in the context of cancer, part of the reason is that for a long time, breast cancer was considered something especially 'shameful' to talk about, and it wasn't until the late 1970s that opportunities for women with breast cancer to talk about it and receive social and emotional support existed. But in the case of breast cancer, it seems to have gone the opposite extreme. But as for society saying there is only one way to support people with cancer or one way to respond/provide su…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:54 AM
2

I think this article is somewhat flawed because although I agree with it's basic premise, I don't see how it follows that men are somehow defective or deficient as a class of people. I have an old friend who was recently diagnosed with lung cancer, and she started a blog describing in detail what she is going through, her treatments, the MRIs and other tests she is going through, etc. When I was in my early 30s, I was referred to an oncologist after my family physician found a nodule on my chest…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:49 AM
1

Don't really see what this has to do with the men's rights movement. ELI5 someone?
/r/MensRights30/07/15 12:29 PM
1

This question gets asked on this forum about once every three months or so, and invariably the response is that the MRM and this forum are supportive of gay rights and participation of gay men. For example: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=gay&sort=relevance&restrict_sr=on
/r/MensRights25/07/15 07:53 AM
5

Three days ago I wrote: [–]CMOS222 1 point 3 days ago It would be really, really interesting if a group of ambitious lady MRAs were to get together and make a similar video "apologizing to all the men in the world for being female". And post it to Youtube. Not because they believe anything in the video, but just to see what sort of reaction it generates. Particularly amongst a certain ideologically-inclined demographic. :-) I love Karen Straughn. You go, girl. :)
/r/MensRights20/07/15 11:19 AM
3

You say, "the difference between believing in equal rights for women and supporting feminism is like the difference between believing in God and professing Catholicism."
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:11 AM
3

No, no, no, folks, you're looking at this all wrong. I think this is GREAT. I think the MRM should get behind this as well and encourage the idea that being a feminist man means you have to be ok with letting your wife have sex with other men. Promote this idea as much as possible. That this is part-and-parcel of the definition of being a feminist. That you can't be a feminist unless you believe in this. We should be using the absurdity, not raging against it. Once this idea becomes generally kn…
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:04 AM
1

It would be really, really interesting if a group of ambitious lady MRAs were to get together and make a similar video "apologizing to all the men in the world for being female". And post it to Youtube. Not because they believe anything in the video, but just to see what sort of reaction it generates. Particularly amongst a certain ideologically-inclined demographic. :-)
/r/MensRights17/07/15 09:00 AM
1

I don't really have any issue with this..."info poster" I guess, and the Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives has a reputation for being a fairly academically rigorous organization. It would be interesting, however, to see the other side of the coin...which cities are the best places to be a man, in the sense of which cities offer the best male-friendly hospital services, parks, social services, etc. and which ones are the most tolerant of the MRM. I think it would be especially interesting f…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:50 AM
1

scrumpinforthelord you're probably pronouncing it wrong. He probably says it like this: While it's important? to respect opinions? on all sides of controversial issues? many of the reasons? these women give? betray an unfortunate? and potentially damaging? ignorance of what feminism actually means? On display? is rhetoric? steeped in rape culture? gender-blindness? and even age-old stereotypes of feminists as angry? hairy-legged? bra-burning? man-hating lesbians? who believe that men are the roo…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 10:41 AM
1

Well what you are not seeing, is her giving Johnson a glare over her right shoulder as if to say, "fuck off", nor are you seeing the woman thrust out her left leg to the left - in the obviously open space - to prevent him from getting to the bar. What you are also not seeing is Johnson with his right hand grasping the underside of the bar, in order to bull himself closer, and the woman attempting to dislodge his arm from the bar with her left elbow. In any case, none of this is justification for…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 06:13 AM
11

A few relevant points: He squeezes, or attempts to squeeze, between the first woman and the second woman to get to the bar. If his intention had been to hit a woman, it would have been easier for him to simply hit the first woman. The first woman gets out of his way as he attempts to reach the bar. Which is the normal thing to do when you have your drink and someone else is trying to order or pick up theirs. She displays no evidence in her body language that she felt threatened by the man's prox…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 01:37 AM
6

Fair enough, but when people on a bus are forced to listen to something they may not like or find offensive, it takes away from their right to the quiet enjoyment of a public space.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 02:51 AM
0

Well, as an MRA, the issue here is very clear, to me at least. Believing in the MRM means believing everyone regardless of their gender should be treated with respect, and that people should not be valued, praised or demonized on the basis of their gender. From this it follows that "jokes" that denigrate either gender are morally repugnant. This song is obviously misogynistic. Although intended to be humorous, it derides women as something whose only purpose is to be the target of a thrusting pe…
/r/MensRights05/07/15 02:27 AM
3

Good grief... Let's assume for the sake of hypothetical discussion that the defendant did indeed sexually assault the girl in question. You serve justice by GETTING THE PROSECUTION'S CASE RIGHT THE FIRST TIME, not by re-trying (trialing?) the case until you get the verdict you want. Apparently the case and the final verdict has been 'devastating' for the family of the girl - this is the prosecution's fault, nobody else's. Regardless of whether or not the defendant really did the crime, in the ju…
/r/MensRights03/07/15 01:32 AM
32

You report her to the police for acting suspiciously outside of a daycare facility. Explain carefully and in detail what she did and explain that you feel her behavior was 'alarming'. Particularly since she seemed to have lied to you about why she wanted you to call her phone. This seems like fraudulent use of a phone, prima facie. Recommend that the police contact her and ask her to explain her behavior and why she was standing outside of a child care facility at 8pm at night. Explain that you …
/r/MensRights26/06/15 12:23 PM
1

Ah, good point, I was tired last night when I posted that. I stand corrected.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 03:56 AM
3

I guess this is supposed to be funny. The only nice part about this is seeing how the other men in the restaurant have the ability to put themselves in the guy's position, and have enough empathy to offer to pay for the guy's dinner. Something the female diners, unfortunately, seem to be sadly lacking. And, at least, he found out very early that his potential partner doesn't have the spine to be there and support him when unfortunate or embarrassing situations arise. If I were in the guy's posit…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 03:57 PM
5

If men are animals that makes her and everyone like her animal-fuckers.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 11:14 AM
11

As soon as a white male commits a crime involving a gun, nutbars like this one call for 'men control' or something like it, because 'the majority of gun-related crimes are committed by males' and we see a lot of self-serving editorials about the "dark side of male nature". But if a male teacher talks a student out of a shooting, his actions are ignored by all the so-called "Womens Studies" types. Then she asks, "why did the UVA campus rape story ring so true with the Rolling Stone editors? Maybe…
/r/MensRights22/06/15 10:40 AM
11

sigh Oh, man, where to start... White, hetero, anglo female, so so desperate to matter, hasn't got the maths or the brains to go into something like petroleum engineering that might really change the so-called 'income disparity' assuming their is one...(you have to give Ellen Pao credit on this at least)... ...again doesn't have the maths or the brains to do medical or scientific research, something that might actually help people, doesn't start a business or NGO, instead is a "professor" at a c…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:38 AM
62

I considered CAFE’s response that inclusion, diversity and equality are values the organization shares with Pride versus the numerous complaints filed against CAFE’s participation arguing that CAFE, as an organization and through its affiliation with men’s rights groups, contravenes Pride Toronto’s vision to, “create a safe space to engage communities in the celebration of their sexuality.” In other words, CAFE had to tell the truth when it's desire to participate was questioned by Pride, but pe…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 01:31 AM
1

They've already reacted. Clinton lost the nomination to Obama in 2008 and a significant number of her female supporters claimed they/all US women were 'robbed' of what they felt was rightfully theirs.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 02:14 PM
4

How many times on this forum have we seen people ask questions like, "Does the MRA support gay rights?" in the past 2-3 years? And how many times have anti-MRA types claimed that the MRA is "heteronormative"? What better way to answer those accusations than to have CAFE participate in Canada's biggest Pride event? The hypocracy of these people is breathtaking.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 10:00 PM
1

Just as an aside, is there anybody else besides me mystified by allegations that this woman is somehow good-looking? She looks like zinjanthropus boisei to me.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 01:58 AM
23

"Listen, everybody, I'm telling all of you right now. Two thousand years ago, good Catholic pioneers like St. Peter and St. Anthony martyred themselves so that you, and everybody else in Western civilization, could have the freedom to believe in God. And if you are not Catholic, you refuse to follow the Catholic church and call yourself Catholic, you are spitting on all that they sacrificed and worked for." "So I'm telling you right now. If you believe in God and refuse to call yourself Catholic…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 05:07 AM
3

Okay let me see where this goes... If women can't consent to sex when they are drunk, then all sex with an inebriated woman, including lesbian sex, is rape. From this it follows that if two inebriated women have sex, they have both simultaneously raped and been raped at the same time. Quantum physicists would love this. So, if two women have sex and therefore have simultaneously raped and been raped, it presumably follows that the 'rape' cancels out the 'being raped' so that no sex crime takes p…
/r/MensRights03/06/15 02:22 PM
4

You're a lawyer?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:08 AM
6

I don't mind debating these viewpoints, and the relative degree to which modern-day people should feel responsible for, and want to 'compensate', past injustices. What I do object to is professional SWJs who try to use these so-called past injustices to either guilt-trip certain categories of people into following submissive behavior patterns. Why do most of these SWJs want to or end up on the student councils, as the "diversity" officer, the sexual harassment investigator, etc.? Because it's al…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:48 AM
17

Then you are being sold a bill of goods. The basic problem with arguing that "discrimination A" is justified by thousands of years of "discrimination B" is that there are an infinite number of "historical injustices" in the historical record. Within the living memory of most of the people on this forum, blacks and gays were discriminated against. In the 1940s, Japanese-Americans were rounded up and put into prison camps. Way back when, Native Americans were systematically destroyed. Even further…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:03 AM
2

You mean at the same time?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 08:58 AM
4

You find a sympathetic lawyer, let them find grounds to sue her and the university, if they are up to snuff they will find all kinds of grounds, and let them keep 100% of the proceeds of any settlement or court ruling. To keep them motivated.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 08:58 AM
465

The Student Union has announced that the petition has received only “165 valid signatures.” Support from 3% of Goldsmiths students was necessary for the petition to lead into a vote of no confidence. The petition has fallen short by 78 votes. Keep the 165 signatures, work to get the other 78 votes, and submit the petition again. Nothing in the Student Union constitution says the original 165 signatures can't be resubmitted at a later date. Another option...don't let the current student council b…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 01:35 AM
1

Foucault's Final Years: 1980-1984. See the second paragraph.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 02:01 PM
4

Actually according to his Wikipedia page he was gay and had a taste for S&M, but minor point.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:12 AM
7

Hess fails to explain why, even if there is such a thing as "ironic misandry", why males have to tolerate it. The concept itself is quite bizarre, and lacks internal consistency. It's like claiming that calling all women "bitches" and "cunts" will "ironically" promote gender equality. It's obvious that "ironic misandry" is just a made up bit of fluff. Notice also how this explanation or justification for "ironic misandry" only comes out after a significant proportion of the university community …
/r/MensRights25/05/15 09:16 PM
1

It would be a good idea to walk around the Columbia University campus with a large styrofoam sheet with all the messages Sulkowicz sent to Nungesser after the alleged rape saying "I miss you" and "I love you" attached to it.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 02:53 AM
2

Of course it's sexist. Konner cherry-picks aspects of genetics and assumes/claims these genetic characteristics demonstrate that females are superior to males. In fact, the only thing these genetic characteristics demonstrate is that they are genetic characteristics. If someone were to say that men are superior to women because on average they are physically bigger, stronger and more muscular, the reasoning would be equally flawed.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:30 AM
4

The Wikipedia articles don't offer any studies on the prevalence of womb envy or vagina envy among any male population anywhere in the world, so whether or not womb envy or vagina envy is a real thing or just 'wishful thinking' on the part of some feminist psychologists is still open to debate. I don't doubt that a certain percentage of the male population have 'gender dismorphia' to a certain extent, and may have complicated or ambivalent feelings about their own maleness. The reverse probably …
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:30 PM
2

The problem is, this second story on the incident really isn't a 'story' at all. CBC Nova Scotia is claiming it's "uncovered more details about the four sailors who were charged". Where is the 'news' in that? If it was more details about the INCIDENT for which they were charged, it would be news. As Sacha points out, this is just sensationalism. They are justifying going after every possible private detail of the four sailors on the unconscious assumption that being charged = guilty. They make n…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 08:28 PM
1

I think I've made my suggestion clear. If you want to argue the details you should probably go talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 08:59 AM
3

Based on that your ability to get a civil judgment against protestors is essentially zero. These protestors were working from a 'researched' article published in a major news magazine. Which as far as they new was a reputable source. You can win the "caused harm" and "was false" arguments, but not the "without sufficient reason to believe it was the truth" argument. Your slander case against the protestors will go nowhere. Your point above was specifically addressing the vandalism and vigilantis…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 08:05 AM
0

That's a possible strategy, but what I'm suggesting is that the frat sue the protesters for slander directly. Keep it a civil suit between the frat and each protester and cut the university out of the loop altogether. Identify as many of them as possible, file suit against the worst offenders, get them in a room with a lawyer and tell them they will end up in court and pay through the nose in a civil suit. Then tell them the frat will settle with them and they can avoid paying monetary damages i…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:49 AM
3

Oh absolutely, I couldn't agree with you more. Sorry if I worded that badly. I just think that the SJWs who slandered the fraternity couldn't care less about the victims of false rape...but they MIGHT get the message that false rape accusations victimize real rape victims as well. Use their own alleged moral superiority against them, so to speak.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:41 AM
10

To sue Jackie or the reporter herself, they run the risk of bad PR and more negative news stories. Not agreeing with it, just saying it's a risk. They should take the risk. They should sue Jackie and in the process hammer home the message again and again that false rape accusations make the lives of real rape victims much more difficult. In addition, they should carefully examine every photo of protesters who stood in front of the frat building, identify as many of them as possible by name and s…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 12:46 AM
7

What one black man does when he encounters a white woman jogging (very funny!)
/r/MensRights06/04/15 10:38 PM
2

Some good advice for men if you are out running and there is a woman running ahead of you (very funny!)
/r/MensRights06/04/15 10:28 PM
1

The what?
/r/MensRights20/03/15 05:13 AM

I noticed that with this video comments and votes are set to "off". If I downloaded it, re-uploaded it to Youtube with comments and votes set to 'on', would Youtube delete it?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:44 PM
3

I noticed that with this video comments and votes are set to "off". If I downloaded it, re-uploaded it to Youtube with comments and votes set to 'on', would Youtube delete it?
/r/TheRedPill08/03/15 12:33 PM
3

You tell them, 'That's like saying the Catholic Church is for everyone who believes in God, so Protestantism, Judaism and Islam are unnecessary'.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:17 PM
2

Professor should put on a pair of airport hearing protection headphones, turn the PA volume up to 120 A-weighted decibels, and just continue with his lecture.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:51 AM

After the hatchet job they did on the Dal dental school incident and this case, the CBC can't be trusted to tell the truth about anything anymore.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:46 AM
8

That is so many levels of bizarre. If she was jealous of your attention to the garden, why did she only pick on the tomatoes? How fucked in the head do you have to be, to be jealous of a tomato plant? You caught her red-handed ripping the flowers off the tomato plant, and instead of offering what anyone would call a reasonable explanation for such behavior, she simply walked into the house and ignored you. Gaslighting by body language. You were living with a nutbar. Since she seems to place so m…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/15 02:17 PM

But as you yourself said, "One of the big issues in psychology ate that everything we know about the mind was only tested on western, educated, industrialized, (globally) rich, college students in democratic nations." In other words, a restricted sample that can't be meaningfully said to be representative of all human populations. If a researcher, for example, selects a statistically significant population sample from, say, 10 different countries with varying cultures, population sizes and stage…
/r/MensRights04/01/15 02:06 PM
1

Knock yourself out.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 01:51 PM

I don't see how you can make that assertion.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 02:25 AM

Nor is there any indication that it's not a culture-bound phenomenon.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 09:23 PM

Which is why a lot of such studies, particularly ones in evolutionary psychology, may not be valid or have much scientific value.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 07:15 PM

But it doesn't demonstrate that it's universal across cultures. If researchers in this field are going to postulate that women are generally regarded as 'more wonderful' than men, they're going to have to demonstrate this general attitude in a multitude of cultures. And if they can't, or don't, or restrict their research to a western/American study population, then they will have to restrict the scope of their conclusions.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 07:13 PM

Culture-bound phenomenon. Researchers don't indicate what societies they did their studies in, and there is no evidence presented that this is a universal human phenomenon that crosses all cultures. Do we find this in Japan? In India? in Tuvalu? Without research indicating that it can be found in more than one culture, there's no indication that this phenomenon is real at all.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 02:11 PM
8

The only thing the gentleman could have done is say to the flight attendant, 'Well, a few minutes ago this woman asked me to move because she said she wanted this seat for husband. Now she is saying she wants me to move because she "feels uncomfortable around me. So which is it: is she saying this because she feels uncomfortable or is she just saying it to get my seat? Because frankly speaking her actions seem like an attempt to disturb MY comfort.' See, women like this will continue to act like…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:53 AM
1

This isn't journalism. It isn't even good editorial writing. It's what Bill Mahler describes as making women nod. Every time I hear another claim about the "natural (moral) superiority of women, it makes me recall two relevant stories: Naomi Wolf. She remembers when she was doing her graduate thesis on the influence of women on sectarian violence in Lebanon. She went there expecting to find that women were a moderating influence. Instead she found many instances of women goading men into conflic…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 02:28 PM
1

OK now wait a minute. Started a new job a few months back. Was out having breakfast, two guys I work with pass the restaurant, drop in and say high. I pick up the tab for the lot of us. One of them later on returns the favor. The other guy...bit of an insecure weirdo, says he's fluent in Japanese and has a black belt in Karate. Never offers to pick up the tab. Yet he has a new car and the latest Iphone. I assumed he was either a cheapskate or his wife controls all his money. Was he "Despising th…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/14 02:04 AM
1

Oh, and if there was room somewhere I'd put up a third banner, saying: "CBC attacks Dal Dental to draw attention away from how they coddled Jian Ghomeshi. For YEARS"
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:35 AM
1

If you have the opportunity to talk to any of the students in the next few days, I would offer the following opinions: the media - the CBC in particular - are harassing Dal Dental and your fellow students. This is not about reporting the news anymore, this is about promoting an agenda, regardless of what the facts are. let's assume for the sake of argument that some, possibly all, of the students in that facebook group have acted badly. Fine: Dal has looked into the issue, and has made the decis…
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:22 AM

She's playing the victim card here because sometimes playing the victim card works.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:28 PM

Maybe when enough female teachers who have sex with their students are sentenced to life in prison, society will start to realize sentencing should be proportionate to the crime.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:20 PM
2

Intotheloop it sounds to me like you are very well-placed to let the rest of the Internet community and Nova Scotia society in particular know what is really going on. Certainly it appears our national broadcaster can't be trusted to do a good job of objective journalism...they have not bothered to contact any of the facebook members involved nor have they given Dal Dental the opportunity to be interviewed and to explain their reasons for the restorative justice process. I was wondering if I cou…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 10:48 AM

Love the photos of her "cringing" under her husband's(?) arm. oneiorosgripwontstfu is right, this woman is solipsistic. Breathtakingly solipsistic. She says to the prosecutor, "I will never forgive you." Like, WTF? oneiorosgripwontstfu you are absolutely right, she put her feelings and wants before the welfare of her student, indulging herself instead of acting in her student's best interest. And it's amazing how many people in society are willing to be taken in and to coddle that level of solip…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:53 AM
5

On top of that, regardless of whether or not these men committed acts for which they deserve to be expelled, these SJWs are not willing to respect either the autonomy of the women participating in the restorative justice exercise nor the autonomy of Dal to settle the issue in a manner Dal deems fit. And they refuse to give the restorative justice approach the time or chance to succeed. They want expulsions now. Period.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 04:21 PM
0

Bravo to Dalhousie University for taking a mature, balanced approach to the dental school student's facebook issue, and NOT knuckling under to the extremists. Let's hope they stay the course. And by the way, Jennifer Nowoselski, if the student union receives "constant complaints from students about sexual harassment, sexist comments and other forms of discrimination", why haven't YOU done anything about it before now?
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:21 PM
66

Just a minor point: always be "wary" of orbiters. But actually the original is true as well...I am quite weary of orbiters by now.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 02:10 PM
8

You really gotta work hard with serious dedication to get to this level of stupid. Seriously, Harvard Law School should re-interview every student who takes this proposal seriously and reconsider whether or not they should be in law school.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 12:02 AM
7

It's a lie when articles like this state that allegations of rape aren't taken seriously on university campuses. This woman's allegations were taken seriously, which is why RS and the university questioned her in more detail in order to get to the bottom of what happened and with the hopes that the alleged rapists would be brought to justice. But the story fell apart precisely because RS, the university, and the police took it seriously. The whole sad mess illustrates that universities should ha…
/r/MensRights09/12/14 09:04 AM
21

A pro-MRA female needs to stand in front of this, turn around, make like she's attacking the kid so it looks like the man is trying to make the woman stop. It would be a much more accurate image of most child abuse.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 02:00 PM

I understand it perfectly. My point is that universities may have no legal or constitutional basis for an "approval" process for student groups. And let's face it...how much "office space" or "funds" does a university group really need, and can it function without it? As some people have pointed out above, the initiation of "feminist-informed" mens groups on university campuses may be used as a way to co-opt legitimate MRAs that may want to form campus groups. After establishing these "groups", …
/r/MensRights23/11/14 01:26 AM

That may be their intentions, yes. But I think there is something important to remember: WHO GAVE THEM THE RIGHT TO DECIDE WHO GETS TO FORM A STUDENT GROUP AND WHO DOESN'T? The right to freedom of assembly and association is guaranteed in the US constitution. Just because either the university or the student union has "rules" about student organizations, it doesn't automatically translate that said rules are either legal or enforceable. Perhaps these "rules" govern which groups can access studen…
/r/MensRights22/11/14 10:02 PM
3

There's nothing sexist about stating that (some) feminists "only care about women" because not all women are feminists and not all feminists are women.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:22 AM
1

If you want some suggestions, sure, if you want.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 07:38 AM
8

A few observations: It always strikes me as bizarre that universities and student unions have such byzantine rules for forming new student groups. Given that a university is basically a institution for social and intellectual development by means of free expression of new ideas, why new groups - including MRM groups - have to jump through so many hoops to form an organization seems bizarre, and frankly illegal. I would love to see an organization take a student union to court and have their rule…
/r/MensRights22/11/14 05:38 AM
8

I guess when you see this part of the documentary by itself, it partially takes the scenario out of context. I think the original intent in the full documentary was to illustrate the infantile behavior of some female groupies/hecklers who have developmentally delayed social skills. The comedian declines to go with the girl for ethical reasons, i.e., not messing in another guy's territory, so the groupie responds in an infantile fashion and takes it out on her doormat boyfriend. I think it's mean…
/r/MensRights21/11/14 02:19 AM
1

EDIT: for those who don't know him, Michael Kimmel is...well, he could best be described as a professional maleness pathologizer. He's made a career (and I use that word dubiously) of pathologizing male identity formation and maleness, promoting the idea that males are "fundamentally flawed" and need to be "redefined". Sort of the way Francisco Pizarro "redefined" Inca civilization. He hasn't been heard from much in the past couple of years so I guess The Guardian decided to throw him a bone wit…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 06:35 AM
3

My only takeaway from this article is that she is simply trying to gaslight males who aren't interested in women of her type. And sadly, a few insecure betas might fall for it. She is, however, a prime candidate to hit the wall HARD in another 10 years.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/14 04:08 AM
1

Great writeup! I think you should submit this to HuffPo or a similar website...and actually I think you've opened a whole new area of research into Male Studies.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 12:46 PM
1

Some good advice for men if you are walking down the street at night and there is a woman ahead of you
/r/MensRights06/11/14 11:15 AM
1

I agree, but in fairness I did say "some", not all. I would certainly agree with the assumption that a significant number of male feminists have come to their beliefs out of a sense of equality and social justice (although I personally sense said individuals haven't completely thought through the implications and contradictions in their beliefs). But as girlwriteswhat said below, there has been more than one recent case where a professional male feminist has turned out to be a predator among the…
/r/MensRights27/10/14 09:23 PM
-1

To see "age related" videos without logging in, just go to the first backslash in the address and delete the "watch?" and "=" and insert a second backslash. For example, change www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB2tJ9XgupM to www.youtube.com/v/RB2tJ9XgupM
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/14 01:08 PM
11

Girlwriteswhat's letter raises all kinds of interesting thoughts in my mind about the motivations of (some) male feminists, and whether one can argue that redpill men are in some ways more honest and trustworthy than bluepill men. The argument that Ghomeshi's pandering to feminists and demonizing all other males is motivated by cynical and disingenous (sp?) motivations to bed women, apparently in rather kinky ways, is very compelling. Perhaps some women find male feminists revolting because it's…
/r/MensRights27/10/14 11:53 AM
5

This is GREAT. I never understood why laundry and laundry commercials had to be "gendered". Hasn't any male who has gone to university or community college had to do his own laundry for 3-4 years? Even in families where the father works and the mother stays home and takes care of the house, in most cases the father/husband STILL a) likes clean clothes, b) knows its important that their kids wear clean, hygienic clothes, and c) knows how to do laundry and shop for laundry detergent. Why detergent…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 12:24 PM
6

If you're a student at the University of Sydney, I'd strongly suggest getting a copy of the Union's constitution as well as its articles of incorporation under the Australian equivalent of the Societies Act. In Canada, every non-profit society or organization usually is registered under either the federal or provincial registry of nonprofit corporations, for income tax purposes. Then go talk to a friendly lawyer, ask him if a nonprofit corporation can pass bylaws restricting the freedom of speec…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 11:44 AM
89

Now. Imagine the opposite scenario. A man "absolutely loves" his Burmese pythons, and has 80 of them in the house. He has names for each and every one of them, and feels an absolute "thrill" every time one of them lays eggs. The house interior is coated in snake shit, they cannot own anything or invite any family member over for a visit because of the smell... ...and the husband just assumes the wife will not only put up with this, but will actively support his obsession "as a sign of her love a…
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 03:35 PM
2

I couldn't agree more. Certainly there is nothing wrong with discussing how certain aspects of feminism impact men's lives, but if that is the exclusive focus of all discussions, we will all end up missing many opportunities to think about male identity and men's lives. From what I've read of Alice Walker's life, she seems like a basket case. The only thing I can say is that I'm glad she's not a part of my life and glad she has not had more influence over people's lives, male or female.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 06:41 AM
4

Same question asked 12 days ago. Answer: I've been a member of this forum for about two years, and over that time, about once a month I see a new post shows up along the lines of, "Is the MRM open to gay members?" and the answer has always been, invariably, YES: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=gay&sort=relevance&restrict_sr=on Two months ago: Been a member of this forum for about two years. About once a month somebody posts a question about whether the MRM is open to gay people and p…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:58 AM
1

And in that same world, she'd have all of her degrees and licenses revoked, every copy of every scientific or medical paper she ever published burned, and denied access to medical journals of any kind for 10 years.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 12:37 AM
7

"The medical world have lost a shining star today." More like they lost a steaming pile of shit today.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 12:32 AM
1

Right I understood that. I was curious about how National Health in the UK approached the issue of HPV vaccination in boys, the reasoning behind the policy and how they eventually implemented it, so that I could understand how it differed from what was done in Canada. I have to admit, when I started this thread, this SEEMED to be a case of discrimination against boys (at least in terms of BC health care policy), and labeled it as such because Reddit demanded I add some kind of 'flair' to the pos…
/r/MensRights04/10/14 12:27 AM
2

It was not given to boys in the UK not because of cost but because there was an ethical issue of whether a gender could be vaccinated for the benefit of the opposite gender. Could you tell us more about this?
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:43 AM
-1

Okay, I stand corrected then. However, I would point out that when HPV vaccination started in Canada in 2008, there was no public discussion or information as to why males were not vaccinated as well. I don't feel that males are "oppressed" if they aren't given exactly the same health care options as females, but I do feel that men have the legitimate right to ask, or to request a reasoned explanation why not. A few months ago I had an interesting discussion with a researcher about a study on th…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:32 AM
0

"too"? You mean you're a biomedical scientist? I'm just an MRA interested in how health-care policy decisions affect males.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:29 AM
6

Nope. This comes under the category of "gender-based discrimination in health care". HPV causes cancer in both males and females, yet free HPV vaccinations have been available for females in Canada since 2008. It makes MORE sense to vaccinate the entire population, for reasons of economies of scale and because vaccinating males helps to prevent the spread of HPV to females.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 06:11 AM
2

The MRM is severely lacking in non-heterosexual members. Not on this forum. I've been a member of this forum for about two years, and over that time, about once a month I see a new post shows up along the lines of, "Is the MRM open to gay members?" and the answer has always been, invariably, YES. If you think this forum and the MRM is seriously lacking in non-heterosexual members, it's because YOU haven't done your research: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=gay&sort=relevance&restrict…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 12:11 PM
2

I disagree with the suggestion that the way genders have been treated in the past should have any bearing on how gender equality is defined in the present. The basic problem with arguing that "discrimination A" is justified by thousands of years of "discrimination B" is that there are an infinite number of "historical injustices" in the historical record. Within the living memory of most of the people on this forum, blacks and gays were discriminated against. In the 1940s, Japanese-Americans wer…
/r/MensRights23/09/14 09:36 PM
17

Exactly.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 01:45 PM
84

It would be a good idea for a group of U of Chicago students to get together and hijack the campaign. Get the list of all students names/email addresses, randomly choose 1000 male students, intermix it with the names of about 50-100 senior members of the university faculty and administration, make identical copies of the original posters and spread them all over Chicago as well as the campus. Watch the shit hit the fan.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 12:37 PM
1

I have a suggestion, just for fun. Sit down right now, write a letter to yourself, copy for her, guessing/extrapolating from this experience where you will be at age 35 and where she will be, what she'll be doing, what kind of beta she'll have bagged, at age 35. Date and seal the letter, put it in a safe deposit box, with a "do not open until ___". Then forget about it. On your 35th birthday, open it up. Throw a birthday party for yourself, invite her. Show her the letter.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 03:19 AM
21

My female friends asked me how much I made, and I made the dumbest mistake of my life by telling them. No, dude. Just the opposite. You got an understanding of how they value you as a human being - or how little they value you - and as a result you probably avoided a divorce rape trap, as you said. Probably the best thing you could have done.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 03:13 AM
1

This article is so stupid it's incomprehensible. She confuses getting an injection in the penis with getting an injection in the vas deferens. And the article HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HER, or women's issues. It's about men having the technology to control whether or not they want to conceive a child. Their choice, their bodies. Regardless of age. Reading this article is like watching somebody's untrained puppy have diarrhea over a new carpet.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 12:50 AM
1

The way I feel, women need to "earn the right" to my patience. A woman who has demonstrated a lot of positive qualities and only occasionally slips up with bullshit, I'll probably be patient with. But the kind of person who makes outrageously snotty comments, I just am not interested. Don't fuck me, I don't care, just get out, you're not worth the trouble. I may be way off base here, but it sounds to me like you are doing the right thing, in that you are transitioning to using a woman's shit-tes…
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 05:03 AM
6

I think any Australian MRA groups or organizations would probably have a good case for getting an injunction requiring that this website be taken offline, on the grounds that the information is completely false and slanderous against men in general.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 01:33 AM
2

You should have told her that you were going to slap her two times for every one time she slapped you. And would she rather wait for your sneak attacks or would she rather receive them now all at once, just to get it over with.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 02:03 PM
2

I bet you anything that neither this dumb cunt or her dipshit orbiter has had a real honest LTR over the course of the 18 years she's describing. Her narcissistic need for simultaneous alpha pole and beta ass kissing has the both of them locked into a dysfunctional toxic mess that you don't want to get wrapped up in. Shit like this is radioactive. So when you encounter such a situation out in the wild, measure it quick and then pump and dump. If I were you I'd go a little farther on the reasons …
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 10:34 AM
3

Been a member of this forum for about two years. About once a month somebody posts a question about whether the MRM is open to gay people and perspectives. The answer is invariably yes, in fact a significant percentage of the members of thisforum are gay or are involved in the gay rights movement. Do a forum search and you will see how often it comes up. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=gay&restrict_sr=on
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:53 AM
3

"And Premier Jay Weatherill has warned South Australians to brace for the worst when details emerge of the alleged offences, saying they could amount to "one of the most catastrophic events in Australian history"." Now. I feel horrible about those seven victims (probably more) of child sexual abuse. But is the Premier of South Australia seriously comparing this to: The 1947 Sydney Hailstorm, which injured over 1000 people: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1947_Sydney_hailstorm The Black Friday Fires…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 01:19 PM
220

It would be interesting if someone were to produce a "parody" video documentary of a typical western wedding, with the genders reversed. With the big emphasis on how the wedding is the groom's special day, the most important day of his life, about how the wedding is all about his importance, significance and happiness. Detailing out in excruciating detail how he planned all the details of "his" wedding, deciding everything. The groom would wear an incredibly expensive, god-like white suit, an or…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 06:30 AM
1

An aspect of the MRM is looking at how men and males are viewed by society. As well as how males are dealt with and responded to in certain situations and contexts. This incident can be looked at from an MRM perspective, not only from the aspect of how this woman treated this boy, but also by how bystanders and the police treated him. As I mentioned below, if you look at this video and review it a couple of times, there are a couple of other noteworthy aspects. Notice that at the beginning, whil…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:35 PM
7

If you look at this video and review it a couple of times, there are a couple of other noteworthy aspects. Notice that at the beginning, while she is calling, she has her hand on some piece of the boy's equipment, presumably a modem or battery or something. Notice how close she is standing to the boy; she feels perfectly within her rights to violate his personal space and take his property. Also, she calls the police, they respond they are coming...THEN she physically assaults the boy. If the po…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 05:04 AM
1

From a men's rights perspective, i.e., adult males being equal members of society, there is no reason why any man should feel obligated to switch their seat just to accommodate somebody else's child. WHY should this child - something that has absolutely nothing to do with me - be a reason to inconvenience my comfort as a passenger? If the kid needs a blood transfusion or a bone marrow transplant to survive, well sure I'd be willing to help out. But beyond that, the kid has nothing to do with me …
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:43 AM
1

I can't describe how small that made me feel, but it just made it clear to me that women have that power, to arbitrarily use creep shaming to completely obliterate men. And it works. Dude. OWN the situation. You step over to the customers who were giving you funny looks, you explain to them that the woman was trying to return a sweater her dog damaged and that you were following store policy, and because she couldn't get what she wanted, she slandered you. And you tell the customers that your st…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 01:46 PM
1

I don't really believe that either, I was just trying to be as equally provocative.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:37 AM
1

Point taken. :)
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:36 AM
1

:-)
/r/MensRights16/05/14 07:02 AM
2

Replicating the wrong is the simplest, most immediate and most effective way of illustrating how that information is unreliable.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 01:38 AM
2

Nonsense. Any Columbia University student who finds this anti-male smear campaign objectionable, and is NOT doing anything to hijack the campaign in the manner I suggest above, is guilty of endorsing the smear campaign through inaction.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 01:37 AM
1

Yep. See, the average Columbia University student/teacher/administrator is not stupid. Post a few graffitos like this illustrating how absolutely unreliable any graffiti smear is and the average person will relate pretty quickly.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 10:46 PM
5

One way to counter this would be to hijack the campaign. Collect the name of every member of the university board of governors, every "mangina" on the university newspaper, add a random selection of 5 percent of the male faculty and student body, and begin a six-month campaign of plastering their names in the bathrooms anonymously. Accuse them of rape and make it look as much like the original campaign as possible. Then get the name of every women's studies professor or graduate student and star…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/14 09:54 PM
2

I'm not a lawyer but one possible option is something called a mandamus: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandamus Basically it's an order from a judge ordering a government body to do their mandated job or face judicial sanctions. If I were you I'd get a lawyer and look into whether or not you could get one requiring the enforcement office to do their job.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 09:23 PM
-1

One way to counter this would be to hijack the campaign. Collect the name of every member of the university board of governors, every "mangina" on the university newspaper, add a random selection of 5 percent of the male faculty and student body, and begin a six-month campaign of plastering their names in the bathrooms anonymously. Accuse them of rape and make it look as much like the original campaign as possible. Then get the name of every women's studies professor or graduate student and star…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 09:19 PM
3

It's also known as the High Rising Terminal (HRT) and some linguistic research as been done on it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_rising_terminal Some of my favorite examples of bad upspeak: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og-PRejcOuA The strange thing about upspeak is that it is so popular among a certain demographic, but is ultimately self-defeating as it alienates the listener. The speaker comes across as both pretentious and yet also begging for acceptance.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 01:29 PM
3

Stepping back for a moment, I don't understand WHY anyone would allow a child under the age of 18 to fly unaccompanied anyway. Solo travel is still dangerous. It's dangerous for adult males, adult females, and senior citizens as well as children. The likelihood that something could go wrong is, of course, extremely low, but for air travel of any kind - especially international travel - it's always a good idea to tell someone where you are going and when you will get back. People get lost, roofie…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:51 AM
1

The logical extension of your argument then is that feminism is also wrong...because it works for the rights of only one specific group.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 12:57 AM
1

MRAs acknowledge that most people who assume male privilege exists never take a closer look at their assumptions, and assume that everybody else must follow their assumptions without question.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 03:22 PM
3

It is YOUR assumption that wanting men's rights = wanting to dominate women. Not ours. It's the common assumption made by people who hear the term for the first time and think they know all about what it means, without reading anything written by MRAs or exploring what MRAs mean when they use the term.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 03:18 PM
12

However, being homosexual myself, I'm disappointed of what I perceive to be a lack of non-heterosexual MRAs. I've been a regular visitor to the MRA forum for about 2-3 years, and over that time, about once every two weeks, we get questions along the lines of a) are gays welcome in the MRM, or b) is there such a thing as a gay MRA. The answer to both is 'yes'. The question is old hat, really. If you perceive a lack of homosexual MRAs here, it's because - as you yourself said - you're new to reddi…
/r/MensRights11/04/14 04:18 PM
5

Question: "Do you recognize your role in gender-based violence, even if you aren't actually a perpetrator?" Answer: "Yes. I have none. Thanks for asking."
/r/MensRights06/04/14 01:04 PM
1

Kuramo, That question has been asked here about 3 or 4 times a month for the past 2 years. The answer has always been, 'of course'.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 01:01 PM
2

I think the important thing to realize here is that Margaret Wente has been a columnist for the Globe and Mail since the 90s. For years she's consistently written pro-feminist and "boys move over its our turn"-type articles. The victory here for the MRM is that a longtime, prominent, Canadian feminist columnist...finally gets it.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 01:08 PM
4

Thanks for your post. The politicization of medical research is something I've always been curious about and concerned about vis-a-vis men's issues. One of the things I discovered is that in some cases research is sometimes concentrated on one gender, not for ideological reasons but for methodological ones. Last year, I came across a study on the incidence and prevalence of UTIs, and I was puzzled by the fact that the study only selected women patients. When I contacted the researcher for more i…
/r/MensRights09/02/14 03:11 AM
1

Dear gawd, how could anyone deliberately lower their value in a relationship to zero like that? Does the guy's parents and blood relatives know about this relationship? It's an inhumanly stupid one.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 05:48 AM
2

I don't know if I would call About a Boy blue pill, but there was something about the whole premise of this movie that pissed me off. A guy in his 30s doesn't want/need to "get married and settle down" and because of this, somehow he is flawed.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/14 12:49 AM
-2

Agreed. Being angry at women, saying that "misogyny is a necessary phase" is just placing responsibility for your own personal change on someone else. It's immature, unrealistic, sexist, and ultimately self-defeating. Over the years, I've seen and heard many comments by women about how "all men are bastards, scum, etc.", usually by women in their 20s whose conception of men clashed with reality. They discovered - the hard way - that they knew much less about men than they originally thought, and…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/14 02:26 AM
4

This guy should wear a tailored suit, nice watch, nice shoes, perfect hair to every meeting with this woman. That's all women can respond to on a gut level. This. Saw this video about a year ago, and it occurred to me there were so many things the guy could do to re-frame (not necessarily in the TRP sense) the situation. First of all, the room is not acceptable. It's full of furniture for children, too small for adults, not comfortable and not suitable for a business meeting. Before even startin…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 03:17 AM
3

You have a right to be graded on the quality of your school work, not on your opinions. I did something similar with an essay I wrote in college and the professor (female) wrote, "I strongly disagree with the opinions you expressed but you argued them very well. B+" (I was happy with the B+, comparatively speaking it was reasonable with my work and that of other students.) You should consider talking to your principal and argue that your grade was based on the content of your opinions, not on th…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 02:46 AM
2

First of all, I was talking about his election as a state senator, not the presidential election. Second, whatever drawbacks he had, he was/is a billion times better than the asshole that preceded him, the one for most of his two terms Obama has had to clean up after.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:47 PM
2

OBAMA is not the thing to worry about. He'll be finished his term soon. For US men, the coming apocalypse is in the form of H.R.C. She thinks she's been entitled to the presidency for years, and has made a point of saying she's here for the girls, the boyz be damned. Remember all those stories floating around in 2008 when she lost the nomination? All the girls were saying, "it was our turn, and we were robbed" because Obama - whom history has demonstrated was the better candidate all along - won…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:16 AM
41

"...and I wouldn't like it." !!?? WTF??? That was all the more reason to go for her friend. Push the envelope and see just how much Ms. WTF values your friendship. Fuck...I would have taken that as a matador's cape and gone right in there for it.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 05:31 AM
3

This isn't a specific answer to your request, but it's something that might be worth pointing out to people who argue that feminism is a wide range of viewpoints and that the alleged "good" of feminism shouldn't be thrown out with the "bad", so to speak. Some supporters of feminist theory argue that feminism encompasses a wide range of viewpoints, and that although there are a few radical misandrist viewpoints, these represent a minority and that feminism as a whole shouldn't be rejected because…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:16 PM
1

Is it going to far to suggest that for people like this group, maleness is something that they need/want to colonize and "reform", somewhat in the way 19th century missionaries and imperialists felt they had a "white man's burden". They have a subconscious assumption that being female is somehow inherently superior or more advanced. Notice the smiles on everybody, especially the women. As if they are doing you a favor by assuming understanding and direction for your growth as a man. They think t…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/14 08:45 AM
1

Sorry for the bad editing, not sure how to put the proper tags yet. I especially liked these howlers: marital rape doesn't exist women become useless by the age of 30 All men are rational and all women irrational. No exceptions.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 08:32 AM
0

First question is WHY.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 05:40 AM
2

Rather than trying to control the wind it's probably wiser to adjust your sails, y'know? Beautifully put.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/14 05:31 AM
9

It's because they don't know how to fit the MRM into their mindset. They're like medieval catholics, faced with the novel concept that some people want to be good christians, without being members of the catholic church. Their limited worldview prevents them from grasping the concept. They are unable to understand that some people - actually most nowadays - are in favor of equal rights between genders without having how that gender equality is achieved dictated by feminists. They assume that all…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 03:14 PM
4

I think at least part of it is due to the metaphor of The Red Pill itself. The Matrix is a well-known movie, and the metaphor of the blue pill/red pill is one that people grasp instantly, even if they strongly disagree with the ideas associated with TRP. It provides a powerful focus to ideas that might otherwise be difficult to summarize succinctly. The people who take the red pill in the movie are the "good guys" battling an all-encompassing evil, so if you associate or identify with blue pill …
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 06:34 AM
0

Just because something is natural doesn't mean it's 'good.' Never said otherwise. But the corollary of this is that just because something is natural doesn't mean it's 'bad'. The writer of this blog asserts that all PIV sex is rape, and I'm assuming you'll agree that rape is bad. The blogger's statement is illogical because by extension, she's saying that all PIV sex, by whatever species, is rape. PIV sex evolved long before the evolution of Homo Sapiens, and by extension, before the development…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 05:43 AM
1

Oops, edit mistake...meant to say "...gay sex is not sex..."
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 01:20 AM
25

Its illogical on a number of levels. PIV sex predates the evolution of Homo Sapiens by at least 100 million years. All reptiles, birds and mammals reproduce by means of PIV sex. Reductio ad absurdum: all sex by higher order vertebrates is rape? Rape is a crime, and thus a social and legal construct. By claiming all PIV sex is rape, the author is basically stating that human females have been selected by evolution to be rape victims, since their genes cause them to develop female sex organs. A co…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 04:53 PM
1

Got it. Thanks!
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 11:26 PM
1

Hahahah no sorry...just something I plucked out of the air. My old handle was "Manner of Speaking" but I posted a few opinions in /r/Mensrights that so offended some people in /r/2xchromosomes so I decided to reboot. CMOS=continued manner of speaking.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 01:48 PM
1

Huh?
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 11:55 AM
1

Now you're deliberately refusing to distinguish between defending oneself from assault, and assaulting someone who may be a mentally ill person. In fact I would go so far as to say you're attempting to make a basis for claiming it's ok to assault the mentally ill regardless of the circumstances. You're also deliberately refusing to distinguish between making a valid criticism of an opinion, and demanding silence from the person expressing the opinion. Yet you yourself described my viewpoint - on…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 11:43 AM
2

Yes. I said that before I realized what your hobby was.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 11:32 AM
0

I'm sure getting into arguments and making statements like this helps to keep your brain active and prevent early onset of Alzheimer's...but you really do need a new hobby.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 11:08 AM
2

Again, none of us on this discussion was there in the room, so it's useless to speculate on why the men who were assaulted did/did not strike the woman back. It is entirely possible that they (rightly) interpreted the situation as someone experiencing a psychotic break, in which case they may not have felt justified (rightly) in assaulting a mentally ill person. We just don't know. Of course someone has the right to raise their hand and protect themselves if they are physically assaulted, regard…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 11:02 AM
1

Gotcha. :-)
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 10:43 AM
1

Got it.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 10:43 AM
0

You have a point. I don't have any basis for writing myself up as alpha, or more alpha than that guy, that isn't my interest. I think I'm still working through all of this stuff in my head. I was mildly annoyed by the guy's behavior because he was basically embarrassing his wife, and he didn't need to. But his behavior is no excuse for not working on improving myself.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 05:09 AM
-1

No. If, as you say, framing is about changing your mentality, it logically follows that as you do so, you're going to start recognizing behavior that doesn't match that new frame in other people. Primarily because of the novelty of the new frame. A change in mentality means you start seeing things differently. Yes, it occurred to me it might be fun to challenge the guy, but it was just a passing thought. The more mature response is to see how that other guy's behavior patterns are undesirable fo…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 05:03 AM
0

But these days, I'm seeing people like him differently than I used to.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 04:48 AM
7

That's possible, but it is also possible that the people in the room at that time were familiar with the woman, had a sense that she was experiencing some kind of psychotic break, and felt that retributive violence was not justified. I'd have to agree with baskandpurr here.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 01:16 AM
6

I did something similar with a woman I knew in college...was 200% beta, put her on a pedestal, orbited her for the longest time, etc. It didn't work out, obviously...and IN FAIRNESS, I didn't really know her, I only had this idealized image of her. I am trying these days to be more TRP, and succeeding...but on the other hand, part of me can't help but feel some...compassion, sympathy, understanding, whatever - for both 20something beta males and women who act like the woman you describe. I'm not…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 01:41 AM
16

I can't help but think that if EVERY man took the red pill, this kind of bullshit would no longer be possible. The lying, manipulating, rationalizing, hamstering, and laying down of double standards by women like this and their supporters would just price itself out of the market.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 04:22 AM
0

The analogy that I like to use is that of the Catholic church during the Middle Ages. Prior to the Reformation, it was almost impossible for a person to claim they were a good Christian without having to follow the dictates of the Catholic hierarchy. When the Reformation began, many people in the Catholic clergy responded, "Yes, there are elements of corruption in the church, and the church must be reformed, but you must do this within the confines of the Church of Rome and the orders of the Pop…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:51 AM
2

This woman's behavior is dumb on so many levels. I remember hearing about a research study done in Canada in the 1990s that found that automobile accidents are a major contributing factor to divorce. In fact, it argued that accidents were the second largest cause of divorce in Canada. The study found that aside from medical and legal expenses, the trauma and life-changing events associated with automobile accidents frequently stress marriages to the breaking point. Which is why you should always…
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 03:39 AM
2

Recently I've been feeling myself having a bit of a transition from being an r/mensrights-visiting person to an r/theredpill-visiting person...I wouldn't say I'm a hardcore TRP type, but I'm starting to feel like I'm "past" just analyzing and pointing out inconsistencies and hypocracy (sp?) in society and feeling comfortable rejecting anti-male attitudes. But I was in an r/mensrights frame of mind for a long time...and I guess the point I'm getting at is that perhaps it's ok for you to just say …
/r/TheRedPill10/12/13 11:38 AM
1

I don't BELIEVE this. The principal or whomever implemented this policy should be taken out back of the local police station and have the shit beaten out of them.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 05:17 AM
16

The basic problem with arguing that "discrimination A" is justified by thousands of years of "discrimination B" is that there are an infinite number of "historical injustices" in the historical record. Within the living memory of most of the people on this forum, blacks and gays were discriminated against. In the 1940s, Japanese-Americans were rounded up and put into prison camps. Way back when, Native Americans were systematically destroyed. Even further back, native peoples of Siberia were con…
/r/MensRights09/12/13 12:13 PM
7

At least they provide us the benefit of knowing exactly what NOT to do to kowtow to her. The pretentiousness is breathtaking.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 05:59 AM
0

And then my friend told me something that blew my mind. He told me that "cute girls" are the last people we should give those tickets to. "Cute girls" just won't appreciate it - they are used to people being nice to them and giving them stuff. Heck, maybe some of them actually knew the tickets were sold out, but came anyway because, you know, they're "cute girls" and more likely than not - they find a way in. You know, he told me, who will appreciate it? Ugly guys. You want to make somebody's da…
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:37 AM
1

On a humorous note, she should advise him to do this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byFMok9lXaU&feature=related
/r/MensRights29/10/13 05:47 AM
4

Bit of a disconnect here... He says women are turning to same-sex relationships because so many of the men they meet are "losers". Then he associates being a "loser" with looking at pornography...then says almost every man or boy he's interviewed has admitted looking at porn regularly. THEN says, for example, that John Mayer likes having a big porn collection. And by implication, is a "loser". John Mayer? I'm not familiar with his music but according to Wikipedia he is a very SUCCESSFUL singer-s…
/r/MensRights24/10/13 02:07 AM
15

If I were you, I would get a buttonhole camera and secretly record every single lecture she gives for the remainder of the course. And get the names of every male in the course, talk to them to see if they feel the same way you do. Five or six years after you graduate, when you've got enough money, contact the other men in the course and SUE her ass off. Don't sue the university, sue her. Don't settle for a settlement. Then, once the court awards in your favor, go after the university in a civil…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:41 AM
5

"We're gonna have to learn to make nuanced arguments that aren't, like, lies or being disingenuous."
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:34 AM
2

Canadian here. If I were you, I'd do as much as I possibly can to prevent any contact with the mother or daughter whatsoever, at least for the present. Who knows...ANYTHING you might say suggesting you have some responsibility or acknowledge paternity of this girl could conceivably be twisted by some lawyer into an "acknowledgement of parental responsibility that could end up costing you big time. And let's be honest...if the mother is that screwed up, who is to say she is a) either telling the …
/r/MensRights12/10/13 01:42 PM
7

would make a great t-shirt.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 08:36 AM
6

Problems with her statements: As PainOnTap points out, she's basing her judgement on the word of convicted criminals. No evidence she made any effort to verify their statements. She took them at their word, which is sexist in itself. Doesn't state whether or not any man associated with the crime for which a woman was sentenced was also sentenced. Promotes the idea that women are unable to take responsibility for their actions. Presumes that "alternative" sentencing is more appropriate for women …
/r/MensRights06/10/13 03:21 PM
-5

You should say, "You're just mad because your mom faps to pictures of me." EDIT: If she's going to be so infantile, just give the infantilism back to her.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 07:13 AM
1

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Sinead O'Connor sticks her nose in Miley Cyrus's business, Cyrus calls her a nutbar, and O'Connor goes apeshit. http://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/oct/04/sinead-oconnor-miley-cyrus On the plus side, it's nice to see some columnists supporting Cyrus's rights to make whatever kind of video she wants: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/03/sinead-oconnor-miley-cyrus http://www.huffingtonpost.com/emma-gray/sinead-oconnor-miley-cyrus-open-letter_b_4039729.html
/r/MensRights05/10/13 02:44 AM
1

I find it puzzling also, because if Sinead O'Connor really wanted women to be empowered, she would have stuck up for Miley's choice to show her body. I don't understand how people don't see that the source of disempowerment of women's sexuality is not when women are "prostituted" out, but when people go out of their way to attack their decision. Sinead is the one trying to disempower Miley. Exactly. I could go on, along this line, but I'd just be repeating what you just said. Now, I'm wondering …
/r/MensRights04/10/13 01:08 PM
1

Everybody all so upset because little hanna montana got all growed up and is desperate for attention. You've got a point there...it's funny how society reacts when child actors grow up, especially female ones. It's almost as though they're "not allowed" in some people's minds to acquire normal human sexuality. Amanda Bynes started out as a sweet, lovable early-teenage actress...and then some people freak out when she expresses a normal sexual attraction by tweeting that Drake can "murder her vag…
/r/MensRights04/10/13 01:02 PM
9

Fascinating. The same argument keeps coming back: "Yes, you men can discuss men's issues, but you are not allowed to do it outside of a feminist framework." In other words, we have the monopoly on framing the questions, and don't you dare question it.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 01:48 PM
8

This statement is fascinating on so many levels. What would happen if groups like this started making nuanced arguments that aren't like lies or disingenuous. The MRM would LOVE it! Finally, groups like CAFE could discuss gender issues in an atmosphere of mutual respect. Second, the statement is an admission that anti-MRM groups have been lying for a long time now. Third, the speaker says it as if not lying or being disingenuous is a BAD thing (!)
/r/MensRights27/09/13 01:46 PM
1

I MIGHT argue that this would only apply if the meeting was private, but I take your point.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 10:59 AM
1

As an aside, I think it's worth putting forward the argument that by making an AUDIO recording of this event, the recorders can't reasonably be accused of 'doxxing' someone, since you can't really put a face to a voice. ...unless the speaker identifies themselves by name. In which case, they would be technically doxxing themselves.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 08:35 AM
2

I think one question that is overlooked or people concerned with "reconstructing" gender fail to address is, even assuming for the sake of argument gender is a social construct, what compelling reason is there that make it necessary to "reconstruct" it? Let's take a similar biological characteristic: handedness. The conventional thinking in western culture is that most people are right-handed, approximately 10% are left-handed. In some ways being a lefty confers disadvantages as most things are …
/r/MensRights23/09/13 05:12 AM
45

When I was in college, there was a woman I really liked. We had a lot in common but I have to admit she was smarter, more disciplined, and more ambitious than me. I also have to admit that I wasn't sure about what I wanted to do with my li...no, correct that. I DID know what I wanted to do with my life: I just wanted to be a regular, ordinary guy with a regular job. I tried to pursue a relationship with her, but she wasn't that interested, and I got a lot of condescending attitude from her. Look…
/r/MensRights21/09/13 03:56 PM
1

Hmmm...does anybody else get the impression that U of T would just like CAFE to "go away"? Frank_n_Berry has a good point here...CAFE should consider hiring local police themselves for security for the event, instead of U of T campus police, if college regulations allow it. At the last event (Paul Nathanson, Katherine Young), the campus police did not seem to do a very good job of preventing disruptions, nor did they find the person who pulled the fire alarm. I just sent an e-mail to CAFE with t…
/r/MensRights21/09/13 01:01 PM
21

Isn't this just kinda the male version of a Shania Twain video?
/r/MensRights15/09/13 11:46 AM
5

Back in the summer somebody posted a transcript of an interview on r/Mensrights with a member of CAFE in Toronto and a male Women's Studies grad student. What struck me most was that the grad student kept insisting that MRAs "must respect" feminism and that men should only seek equality through a feminist viewpoint. I went to bed that night thinking, "This guy sounds so....religious, dogmatic, so rock-solid convinced that feminism must be genuflected to at all times. I got up the next morning an…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:57 AM
13

** blushes, kicks dust ** Aw shucks.... :-)
/r/MensRights12/09/13 01:09 AM
2

In fairness, or at least to give the benefit of the doubt, the admins probably deleted the thread as a person's name was identified from the video, and they HAVE posted new rules recently about not identifying or doxxing people. Even if the person is identified from a Youtube comment it doesn't detract from not following the rules. If this incident becomes a news story, it's arguable the person's name is fair play for mentioning, but until it does, use a euphemism like "Big Red" or something.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 08:36 AM
7

Fuck that shit. Get up, go over to her, say, "Good afternoon, Ma'am; is there a problem? You seem to be looking in my direction while I am enjoying this nice afternoon enjoying my drink. Is there something I am doing that you are concerned about?" If she brings up the issue of child security, then very nicely and politely start a monologue about how society presumes any male alone in a recreational place is presumed to have malevolent intentions. Describe how it's unfair, sexist and discriminato…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 01:17 AM
5

Unprofessional on so many levels. Take the room, for example. Basically a kid's playroom. For starters, I would have insisted on having the meeting in a more professional room - a conference room with a conference table where people can sit and take notes. This was like he was called into a kiddies room at a daycare for a 'time out'. Indicative of the mindset of the workers. And, the interviewee should have had a pro-bono lawyer, a pro-bono nurse or doctor if possible. These CPS workers are lect…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 04:04 PM
9

Who cares. Even if you count her as just a spectator, she assaulted one of the competitors and dislocated his jaw. Would the penalty be any less severe if a spectator assaulted an athlete in any other sport? She should also be required to pay for his medical costs. And I hope he goes to the most expensive hospital he can find.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 12:58 AM
1

Sounds like she'd be great fun at parties, doesn't she? From that look on her face I'd say she was toilet-trained at gunpoint.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:41 AM
0

Being tough on crime versus being easy on crime is a side issue. Gender equality should be achieved by raising the bar for female pedophiles and statutory rapists, not lowering the bar for male ones. Once that is achieved, if society later changes its values and determines that harsh sentences for any pedophile is unwarranted, that's society's decision. Not one I would agree with, and one I don't see happening anytime soon. And particularly in the case of teachers, they have a duty of care to th…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:08 AM
1

You come from a different country, and thus a different value system. In Canada criminal matters are under the jurisdiction of the federal government exclusively. There is one federal Criminal Code, it is widely understood and respected, and there is no lack of avenues by the average citizen to participate in its amendment. So in this sense, this aspect of the "government" is synonymous with the public and the average citizen. And no hazard applies to letting "the government" determine your mora…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:03 AM
1

If by "government" you mean the Criminal Code, then yes, you do allow the "government" to dictate what you believe to be right or wrong as far as criminal acts go, and I have no problems with that.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 10:30 AM
0

Personally, I think the idea that 13-16 year olds can't consent is ignoring the fact that they are already sexual beings, and that many of them understand what they want, even if they aren't always as educated on the possible end results as we like to assume that adults are. I see the point of your argument, but I simply don't want to give the misandrists of this world any basis for saying "MRAs think the courts should go easy on child molesters and pedophiles".
/r/MensRights31/08/13 10:26 AM
11

Some women are masters at giving the 'condescending glare'. The advantages of this kind of body language is that you can pass judgement on someone without having to verbally account for or defend your opinion. The trick is when you encounter someone like this, reflect it right back at them. In your situation, the appropriate thing do to would be lean back against your car, fold your arms, tilt your head slightly, raise one eyebrow slightly, wrinkle your nose VERY slightly as if they smell bad, a…
/r/MensRights31/08/13 01:25 AM
16

Gender equality should be achieved by raising the bar for female pedophiles and statutory rapists, not lowering the bar for male ones. Even if it is unfair now, it does no good to society by advocating lighter sentences for male offenders. If someone commits statutory rape, they should get a harsh sentence, regardless of their gender or the gender of their victim. And I don't care how "willing" the victim was, if they are under the age of consent, they are legally unable to consent. Period.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 02:04 PM
1

:-)
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:21 AM
1

Establish a mean knowledge level for people of a given age group and have someone exceed that and meet the mean knowledge level of a higher one. First, go ahead and quantify "knowledge". Take your best shot. Then explain why that mean level of "knowledge" is caused and determined by the age. Then explain the legal basis of allowing a child to be molested (even if said child gave consent) because their "knowledge" exceeds their chronological age. That makes no sense, how is it designed to hurt th…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 01:33 PM
9

What. the. fuck. And just how does one go about determining someone is "older than their chronological age"? And what is the point of sentencing someone to 15 years in prison and then suspending all but 31 days? That's just DESIGNED to hurt the victim's parents. This is messed up.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 04:59 AM
2

Got it, your point is well-argued. Thank you!
/r/MensRights28/08/13 01:33 AM
1

I haven't read everything you've written up here but I get your point that involuntary celibacy can be bad for a person's health, depending on the society and circumstances they live in. But I don't understand what the specific association is between involuntary celibacy and men's rights. Wouldn't involuntary celibacy be bad for women's health as well?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 01:12 AM
2

No. It's not proven that anybody was raped. And this is where the men's rights aspect comes in. If it's not proven they committed rape, they are entitled to the presumption of innocence before the law and by extension by society. I have no idea whether they are 'shitty' people or not, but they are still entitled to the presumption of innocence in the absence of proof. Suppose for the sake of argument that Reteah Parsons really was raped, but she was not a very good person. She liked to torture k…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 07:14 PM
0

Um...it's from 2005? She's probably embarrassed she wrote it by now.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 07:05 PM
1

The thread wasn't about Reteah Parsons as a person, but about the way the issue has been treated in the media and the justice system from an MRM perspective. In that sense all I was doing was responding politely and relevantly to the comment you posted two days ago. I don't understand how you can think those boys 'got what they deserved'?
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:51 AM
12

Because the question is analogous to asking someone, "If you believe in God, why aren't you Catholic?" At the risk of repeating myself, I use the following metaphor: During the Middle Ages in Western Europe, Christianity was 100% synonymous with the Catholic Church. Although a variety of doctrinal variations emerged over the centuries, the Catholic Church asserted an absolute monopoly over how Christians established a relationship with God. The Roman Pope even eventually claimed authority over t…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 06:36 AM
2

One of the greatest writers in the English language, awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2007. And proof positive that a woman can be a lifelong, committed feminist and still have a balanced and positive opinion of men and their concerns: http://sexmean.blogspot.kr/2009/12/lay-off-men-doris-lessing.html https://www.google.co.kr/search?q=doris+lessing+men+bashing&oq=doris+lessing+men+bashing&aqs=chrome..69i57.10673j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
/r/MensRights25/08/13 06:25 AM
3

I've never been particularly impressed with Atwood. Yes, she can write, but so can a lot of other people, and I don't get the cult status that's grown up around her. She predicted lab-grown meat? Okay, fine...the prop designers for Star Trek predicted the clamshell cellphone. No biggie. Sometimes I think she gets overworshipped in Canada because Canadians are subconsciously insecure and desperate about having a culture of their own. The whole Tim Hortons thing. I was rather delighted a few years…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 01:05 AM
1

I initiated this thread as a men's rights discussion, and for that reason Reteah Parson's character is irrelevant to the discussion. She could have been a cat-torturing racist for all I care, nobody deserves to be raped. And everybody has the right to a fair trial and the presumption of innocence. The law doesn't distinguish between creating child pornography and distributing child pornography. People who distribute it are just as culpable as people who create it. And in any case, the two defend…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 06:05 AM
1

And there are many, many aspects of this case, and how Nova Scotian society responded to it, from a men's rights perspective. Was Parsons raped? We will never know for sure. Did Parsons later claim she was raped because the sex was consensual but later regretted? Again we will never know. Did she later claim she was raped specifically because of cyberbullying? We don't even know exactly WHY she attempted suicide. We have her parent's side of the story, but these people have done so much to manip…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 01:47 AM
1

I can't help but agree with you on your last point. The only people that are being charged with distributing child pornography are the boys who were at the event and may have raped/had consensual sex with Parsons. Why only them? If everyone who distributed that photo broke the law and/or contributed to Parsons's suicidal mindset, how are they not just as culpable? From a men's rights perspective, how is this fair or just?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 01:35 AM
2

if there's only subjective truths then there's nothing that makes one subjective truth necessarily worth paying more attention to than others. This means the people who are arguing for the others to paying attention to certain subjective truths are choosing those over others. Bingo. The argument that there's only subjective truths opens the door to arguing that Hitler was right, for example, to exterminate Jews because in his subjective worldview, they were not human and the cause of all of Germ…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 01:14 AM
2

Sounds like Dr. Phil is about to join the endless ranks of people who didn't take the red pill voluntarily, but instead had it shoved down their throat. :-)
/r/MensRights22/08/13 01:40 AM
3

They're a moral panic charity. Drum up money by scaring women into thinking there's a rapist under every bed. They were the ones who put out the 'It's a Rape Whistle' commerical about a year ago, and got something like 17,000 negative responses on Youtube within a few days. They had to shut down the comments section for a week so that the Ministry of Truth could sanitize the comments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y86X8Ih2pxM
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:47 AM
3

There is a lot of misandry, or at least, a lot of mild and subtle denigration of men, in TV and in movies. I first noticed it in Home Improvement, but one TV episode that struck me in particular was an early episode of CSI: Miami. In the episode, a detective - big, burly, pretty good looking guy - becomes infatuated with "Calleigh", but she does not respond to his approaches. In the final scene, played in slow motion, the detective looks at her longingly while she is smiling and talking to someo…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:16 AM
3

I think the world would be a better place if women were banned from teaching in schools.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:09 AM
30

During the Middle Ages in Western Europe, Christianity was 100% synonymous with the Catholic Church. Although a variety of doctrinal variations emerged over the centuries, the Catholic Church asserted an absolute monopoly over how Christians established a relationship with God. The Roman Pope even eventually claimed authority over the Orthodox churches of the East. Among the secular population, it was taken for granted that the only way to be a good, pious Christian was to be a good Catholic, an…
/r/MensRights16/08/13 09:45 PM
2

On a side issue, if this woman's parents claim she is being prosecuted only because she is gay, then the district attorney involved should have the right to get a supoena and force the parents to appear before a judge explaining what evidence they have for their claim. Or, if the parents are making false claims that cannot be substantiated, the district attorney should go after them in civil court and sue them for defamation. I'm getting a little tired of these parents who think they have the ri…
/r/MensRights16/08/13 06:00 AM
6

A great way to respond to the 'white male privilege' canard: "Gee, you know what? Now that I think about it, as a white male, I do feel pretty privileged. In fact, the more I think about it, this feels pretty good. After all, it's not everyone who can be white and male, right? And you must think being white and male makes me pretty special as well, otherwise why would you put so much importance on it. Thanks for making me feel better about myself. Sorry your not white and male, too, but...have a…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 05:29 AM
5

I don't....find this funny. If I was with my husband at the hospital and the nurse started poking fun at him being in pain, she would be shitting twice every day thereafter because I would rip her a new asshole. It isn't funny just because it involves a penis. Just unprofessional. Administering patient care is not the appropriate time to be a wise ass. I were you, I'd make the following response to any professor, student or nurse who made that kind of statement: "In fact, a woman I know named So…
/r/MensRights01/08/13 08:54 AM
2

As soon as I read the first one, "Recognize your privileges", I chuckled and closed the tab. Honestly, this 'know your privileges' accusation is so infantile, it's like they're trying to paint someone with a special paint and hope it will stick, when all it does is reveal the speaker's subconscious sexism. Imagine saying, 'How to be an ally to white people? Recognize you're black, and act accordingly.' The really funny way to respond to this canard is to say, 'Yeah, you know what? You're right. …
/r/MensRights28/07/13 12:45 AM
3

Something that you CAN do, is get yourself in a social setting where she admits to your face that she called the hospital and made the false accusation. Then, go to a notary, and swear out an affadavit that she said this to you personally. Send copies of the affadavit to the hospital, the man who was fired, the district attorney's office, and the offending cousin. And watch the shit hit the fan. No blowback will come to you because all you are doing is telling the truth.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 02:14 AM
1

They weren't part of the 'in' group in middle and high school, so they're subconsciously getting their revenge by labeling a certain crowd 'privileged'. Honestly, the vocabulary is so infantile.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:08 AM
1

Brain hasn't fully finished forming yet. Sorta like hetero uni chicks who let themselves be filmed 'experimenting' with a female friend at a party, ten years later when the video turns up on the Internet they're all like, 'wtf was I thinking'.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 01:19 PM
2

Don't worry about the 'should of known'. You're getting something off your chest, not attending a grammar class. I think your boss is partly right, although it doesn't make the situation any less painful. It's probable that some of these people in your office are simply young and somewhat hypersensitive. I wasn't there, but when you think back to your conversation with your boss, think about the words your boss used and the manner he/she used them. Was he/she being critical of you, or was he/she…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 01:23 AM
1

Send them a registered letter telling them they are welcome to attend the event and listen to the speaker, but if they do anything to disrupt the event, CAFE and MR Edmonton will attend the next five events Cristina Stasia is involved in, and will do their best to disrupt said events. Seriously, nobody is discussing the subtext here...the assumption that people like Stasia have some kind of assumed right to disrupt MR events that have absolutely no relevance to 'rape culture' or anything else fe…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 01:13 AM
3

I would suggest that the bully metaphor is actually very helpful in understanding some aspects of misandrist feminism and feminism-based harassment. One aspect of bullying is an unrealistically high opinion of one's self disproportionate with social reality and disproportionate with reasonable standards of how people treat each other. Bullies feel entitled - ENTITLED - to accuse, verbally or physically abuse, and inflict pain on others in order to generate a conflict that will result in the bull…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:26 AM
2

Perhaps the Salon article does have a point. I would say, however, that the media articles and the Salon article have created an opportunity for Mens Rights Edmonton to take the 'next step'. Post 'don't be that girl' posters again, but THIS time include details about the women in Edmonton who falsely accused a cab driver of rape to get out of a $13 cab fare. This happened just back in April: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KKoIWr47Jtk#at=14 . ...and watch the man-haters go…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 05:23 AM
2

Four years ago, South Korea passed a law mandating that every elementary school must have a minimum of 10% of each gender on the teaching staff. So if the majority of teachers are female, at least 10% of the teaching staff must be male. They should pass that law in Canada.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 05:23 AM
3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byFMok9lXaU&feature=related
/r/MensRights01/07/13 01:34 AM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byFMok9lXaU&feature=related
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:30 AM
26

Because of comments and attitudes like these, gay men are a single straight man's best friend. What I mean is, you get it. You're tired of the fag hags and the men bashers and have a live-and-let-live attitude towards your straight male work colleagues and friends. And for the life of you, you can't understand why anyone would want to be sucked into this kind of 'lifestyle' where your paycheck, your freedom and your happiness is determined by somebody else's biological "imperatives". I'll even h…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 12:40 AM
49

So Parson's theory is 58 years old and Carlen's theory is 16 years old, and the book offers no research to support either theor...oops, wait, not theories, arguments. And this is what passes for rigorous science?
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:56 PM
1

I think there are some good historical, justifiable reasons for it. Prior to the 70's breast cancer was not talked about in public very much, there was a tendency to regard it as too embarrassing or shameful. As a result, women who experienced it did not have much of a support group to turn to. A common form of treatment for it at the time was radical mastectomy, which was (and is) still considered very disfiguring. In the U.S., Mary Tyler Moore helped to break the taboo against talking about br…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:45 PM
6

I've said this elsewhere, and at the risk of repeating myself, the problem here is analogous to medieval Catholics and Catholic clergy being psychologically unable to fit Protestantism into their worldview. Nowadays, it's taken for granted that a person can be a good Christian (if they so choose) without being a member of the Catholic church. In medieval times this was anathema to the Catholic church. In a similar manner, this person you're dealing with simply hasn't got the mental equipment to …
/r/MensRights21/06/13 05:37 PM
1

Yes, which is why I can see why market researchers and economists might be somewhat interested in the phenomenon. But again, big deal. Providers of goods will have to change to suit the tastes and desires of unmarried males, not vice-versa.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 04:44 AM
2

The strange thing about commentaries like this is...yes it's heartening that some journalists, both male and female, are expressing an interest in men's concerns and why some men are deciding that marriage or other tradtional gender roles are not for them. But on the other hand, why is this such a big deal? It says right in the U.S. Constitution: "the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". If all people have the right to pursue happiness, and if some men are deciding that they are…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 05:14 AM
2

Has anybody else noticed that people like this guy and Big Red always say, "Shut the fuck up", rather than something like, "You're wrong"? Isn't saying "Shut the fuck up" rather than "You're wrong" a subconscious admission that the MRAs they are addressing have a point? 'Yes you have a point but I don't want to hear it' rather than, 'No, that's incorrect and here's why'?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 01:11 PM
8

You hit the nail right on the head. Here's my take on it (comment from a related thread): During the Middle Ages in Western Europe, Christianity was 100% synonymous with the Catholic Church. Although a variety of doctrinal variations emerged over the centuries, the Catholic Church asserted an absolute monopoly over how Christians established a relationship with God. The Roman Pope even eventually claimed authority over the Orthodox churches of the East. Among the secular population, it was taken…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 12:32 AM
7

Prior to the Protestant Reformation, the Catholic Church held an absolute monopoly over Christian thinking in Western Europe, and how individuals established their relationship with God. Within the Catholic Church, some clerics were extremely observant, some extremely corrupt, and a variety of doctrinal variations emerged over the centuries...but it was taken for granted that the Catholic Church was the ultimate, absolute arbitrator of the individual's relationship with God. The Reformation chal…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 05:49 AM
1

A lot of inherent, unexamined contradictions in this line of thinking... First of all, if all conventional heterosexual intercourse is rape, and all gender roles are socially constructed, then it follows that at a psychological and social level, heterosexual intercourse can be socially reconstructed. With animals, most heterosexual intercourse occurs strictly for the purpose of reproduction. Humans have reconstructed this biological function for the development of pair bonding and building inter…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:54 AM
2

I'm of the opinion that nobody deserves to be tricked into a position of being legally/financially committed. Absolutely.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 09:25 PM
6

Good on you for looking out for him, even if he wasn't your friend or didn't deserve it. Well played, that was an awesome manager-y thing to do.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 02:46 PM
59

Guys, take it from an older guy (probably your dad's age here)...if you got something down there that doesn't look normal, DON'T ignore it. Go get it looked at right away. And INSIST on having a doctor look at it. A lot of guys will tend to ignore or dismiss things that should be looked at, it's a male tendency...but it's also true that sometimes female doctors and nurses may tend to act like you're being a baby if you insist on having something looked at. When I was 21, I got out of the shower …
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:31 AM
2

Oh gawd. This is the guy who wrote that thing Guyland. I ran across a copy of this in the library where I was on vacation a few years back and started to read it. Got two chapters in and promptly but discreetly buried it in the bottom of a trash can. Figured I was doing every guy - and probably most of the women - who will visit that place in the future a favor. Kimmel and people like him must be panicking at the thought of the MRM becoming more widespread - must be hoping to start programs like…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:10 AM
-1

Okay, let me walk you through it. Misandry is a men's issue. The assumption that because men do not experience labor pain, they SHOULD be forced - or feel compelled morally - to experience it, is misandrist. It's based on the assumption that the life experience of men is somehow of lesser value than that of a woman. EDIT: I have an idea. Since this experience is so 'educational' for the men, why not coerce children into submitting to it as well? I wonder how the people who enjoy this video would…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 11:14 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 09:27 AM
2

I agree with your mother. Mandatory military service is an example of something that can be described as discriminatory and sexist, from both a man's perspective AND a woman's perspective. From a woman's perspective, it suggests that women are incapable of serving in combat roles. From a man's perspective, it's based on the supposition that males are more disposable. Another example is baby changing stations only in women's bathrooms. From a man's perspective, it implies that men are incapable o…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:20 AM
2

The Protestant Reformation emerged, among other reasons, as a result of a long period of degeneracy and corruption in the Catholic Church, as well as simply muddled-thinking. Prior to the Protestant Reformation, the Catholic Church held an absolute monopoly over Christian thinking in Western Europe, and how individuals established their relationship with God. Within the Catholic Church, some clerics were extremely observant, some extremely corrupt, and a variety of doctrinal variations emerged o…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 02:33 PM
0

That's Gillian's point. Her hypothesis is that they are portrayed as evil in fiction, but - for whatever reason - rarely so in the genre of biography or in the real world.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:56 AM
3

I'd rather just stick to the topic, if you don't mind. I thought it was noteworthy that the authors chose the word 'rape' to describe what happened to the victim, and I'll leave it at that.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 04:17 PM
2

Why did the Japanese internment take place? Japanese-Americans had the same rights under the Constitution as other US citizens. They were interned because of societal attitudes that rationalized/justified taking away their civil rights. Same with Jim Crow. Comparing these events with society's treatment of men today, the degree of discrimination is different, of course, but I would argue the cause-effect is the same. When society demonizes a certain group, it usually has an immediate effect on t…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 04:03 PM
3

Just an opinion. In the United States and most liberal-democratic countries, all citizens have the legal right to equal treatment before the law and to due process. In practice, few liberal-democratic countries have been successful in ensuring those rights for all citizens during their history. The unequal treatment of Japanese-Americans and Japanese-Canadians during World War II, treatment of African-Americans before the civil rights movement, etc., are obvious examples that come to mind. One r…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:40 PM
1

Good question. The only way I can see this story having anything to do with men's rights is the author's choice of the word 'rape' to describe what happened to the victim. They seem to be resisting the canard that only men rape, or are capable of rape. If CNN writers are starting to describe female sexual assault in this manner, perhaps it's a sign that the general perspective on rape within society is changing? That the general public is no longer willing to subscribe to the notion that women c…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:05 PM
2

With all due respect, I think you might be taking a temporary bout of 'negativity' on this forum a little too seriously...the Internet, and every active discussion group on it, is a bit like the weather; there are 'sunny' periods and 'cloudy' periods...but the fact that this forum has gone from about 20,000 active subscribers to close to 70,000 in a little over a year...well that seems pretty positive to me. :)
/r/MensRights27/04/13 12:48 PM
6

We actually had a discussion about this last week; I started a thread about it, but didn't have time to post responses - and the comments speak for themselves. Most of the reactions were pretty positive: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1cr455/mras_opinions_of_transgendered_people_and_issues/
/r/MensRights27/04/13 12:43 PM
-1

I think intortus's point is that people shouldn't be trying to go around the rules to doxx someone here...on AVfM some people have been 'outed' because they were recorded on video verbally abusing someone in public. With a blog, an anonymous blog, it doesn't matter how outrageous the statement, the person still has a right to privacy unless they've done something clearly illegal. Regardless of Sunil Tripathi, two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:36 AM
1

It's interesting that this article and ones similar to it bring out one characteristic of misandrists: selective compassion. In this article, 'Charlotte' is painted as a victim, someone 'harassed' by MRAs at the University of Toronto forum 2 weeks ago, yet not a word is mentioned on how two respected, tenured professors from McGill University were interrupted, intimidated and harassed by 'Charlotte' and her fellow travellers. Did Charlotte deserve to be 'interrupted' by MRAs at the event? You be…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:24 PM
4

Yeah, a deep dark corner. All 70,000 of us. Right. :)
/r/MensRights20/04/13 06:21 PM
3

Are you referring to your post titled, "Paul Elam should take down register-her.com"? I saw your point, even if I found your letter to be a tiny bit condescending (that might have just been a misperception on my part), and for my part I politely disagreed. And to a certain extent, I must disagree with your suggestion that "The Men's Rights Movement needs to be better than that. We are better because we are honest We are better because we are smarter. We are better because we are passionate. We a…
/r/MensRights20/04/13 05:50 PM
7

Even if she's no longer working there I can try and see that someone who blatantly discriminates isn't able to affect such an important process again. Please do so and let us know what the Admissions Office says. Also, I think this is way beyond just trying to see that someone who blatantly discriminates isn't able to affect such an important process again, as you say. If this person really did this, the university will need to investigate and determine how many admission applications this perso…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 03:10 PM
6

I really hope this blows up. I can't help but wonder how many other times this has happened to white male applicants at other universities. Could this be one of the reasons for "declining male enrollment" at universities? EDIT: information e-mailed to HuffPost and Barbara Kay at the National Post. FURTHER EDIT: information also e-mailed to FIRE
/r/MensRights18/04/13 05:37 AM
6

I remember reading an interview Martin Luther King Jr. had with a journalist, where Dr. King said he finally got tired of talking to white liberals who said, 'Yes, you're right, blacks deserve equal rights', but would do nothing to change things or support the civil rights movement. King said it was necessary to get beyond just arguing and demonstrating by reason, and get to confrontational but non-violent civil disobedience - sit ins, etc. I don't see anywhere where AVfM or Register-Her has cal…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:19 PM
6

Author's examples don't support her solution. She doesn't offer any statistical evidence that all rape victims are so traumatized during police investigations or trials. No evidence that she checked to see if there are any rape victims who were subject to similar treatment and did not suffer any ill effects. Responses to situations like this are always going to be subjective. How is any police officer or defense attorney to know their questions may traumatize someone into committing suicide? Her…
/r/MensRights14/04/13 01:39 AM
2

You should invite him to step outside and prove it. Tell him it's purely in the spirit of healthy intellectual debate, of course. :-)
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:05 AM
2

Exactly. "He knew who I was and why I was there". Then why did he sit there until she came up to him? Why didn't he haul ass? Why did he ask, "what is this?" and such? And even if he knew who she was, how does that remove from her the legal obligation to identify herself and state why she was there? I mentioned earlier, these women are suicidally crazy. The more I think of it, they are batshit insane. After shooting the man in the eye, he would have been perfectly, legally, justified in running …
/r/MensRights07/04/13 01:08 PM
2

I looked at this video again a few minutes ago...these women are suicidally crazy. They placed themselves in a position where the guy would have been perfectly justified in running over one of them in his car during his escape from the parking lot, and legally there would have been nothing they could do about it. He could have run over one of them, and justified it on the basis that he was blinded in one eye and couldn't see properly, or justified it in self-defense. How would he know what kind …
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:08 AM
6

The levels of sexism and misandry in what these women did to this man, and in their behavior, are astounding. It's also revealing of how they self-construct their gender and what rights they feel they have vis-a-vis the rest of society. 'Bounty Hunter' and 'Cheater'-type programs appeal to some because of their voyeuristc elements - we get to safely watch a 'thank God that's not me' situation. And in the case of this group, they get to use the law as a shield to safely assault, attack and humili…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 02:03 AM
2

I can't help but point out that U. of T. did a terrible job of security at this event. OPIRG and other organizations may have a right to protest, but they don't have a right to disrupt a campus event, block doors or set off fire alarms. The university and security should have made the protesters stay outside and at least 100 meters from the building - they had enough information in advance to know that attendees could have been seriously hurt by protesters. They also could have made sure the res…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:51 AM
2

The writer is not only sexist, she's wrong. First of all she's confounding a chromosome with gender, and second she's also patently wrong about what is happening to the Y chromosome: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328535.100-mens-y-chromosome-is-not-about-to-go-extinct.html In any case...it's a CHROMOSOME, not a person or a class of persons. She sounds like a fruitcake for confounding the two.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 11:16 PM
2

Since some of the people involved in the uncivil behavior have already been outed/doxxed, and have been shown to be members of anti-MRA groups, this has already been proven wrong. More likely that certain feminists refuse engagement because it would result in certain cherished beliefs shown to be wrong and contradictory. Hence their resort to threats, intimidation and vandalism.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 03:39 AM
1

Absolutely. Firm MRA and lifelong small-l liberal here. Anybody who is against equal respect for men and males who tells you that you can't be both is just trying to pidegonhole you.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 03:30 AM
2

I think this is grounds to get a restraining order against these groups requiring them to stay away from the next event. Somebody should call a sympathetic lawyer.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 11:16 PM
-6

Yeah, you're right.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 06:01 AM
10

Yeah, it's especially infuriating considering how the community here is ultra-liberal and feminists had a heyday with this. With a campus swath in fear of rapists in the woods, I've seen anti-rape culture rallies and propaganda around campus a lot. And then when we all found out it had been faked, the feminists worried that this girl getting caught/punished would make other victims think twice about coming forth. We as a society really have to start resisting this line of thinking - that false r…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 02:10 PM
25

Isn't this as much a part of 'rape culture' as is being a rapist? This woman used rape as a way to get back at her boyfriend, and to create a climate of fear at her university. Isn't using rape and the fear of rape in this way, can't it be defined as part of 'rape culture'? And let's be clear...this woman is not 'sick'. She deliberately and carefully manufactured the appearance of a crime with great meticulousness and care.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:26 AM
10

A week after Sandy Hook, somebody posted a story here about a high school teacher in California who confronted a student with a gun, and talked him out of committing mass murder at his school. That male teacher probably saved dozens of lives, including the life of the student, yet he got almost no press coverage on his heroism. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-20975608 In the Aurora movie shooting, three men sacrificed their lives to protect their loved ones, yet their heroism also goes…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 11:05 PM
5

Because the whole Adria Richards incident is a visible demonstration that it's the men who need a safe space to talk at PyCon, not the women.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 10:57 PM
3

When I was in college, I got on the bus one day. There was only one other man on the bus, and as I searched around for an empty seat, I got a few hostile glares from some of the female riders, which I didn't appreciate. About halfway to my college, the bus stopped and a very distraught woman in her 50s got on the bus. She had gotten into a fight with her boyfriend who beat her up, took her coat (it was winter) and left her by the side of the road. She was crying and howling, terrified that her b…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 01:07 PM
1

A nice person and otherwise well-meaning friend of mine sent this today. Generally, I don't like to make fun of other people's religious beliefs, but... A whole can of worms here. Selective archaeology, among them.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:43 AM
2

Point taken...shoulda put that in quotation marks.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 01:05 AM
9

Looking at the twitter feed, it amazes me that nobody commenting there could give a damn about the guy who got fired, yet everybody is extremely upset that Richards got fired. The indignation. How dare somebody treat her as unjustly and with just as much lack of proportion as she treated those men. Equality's a bitch, isn't it.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:58 AM
5

The two gentleman involved were cautioned by the conference organizers to moderate their speech, they did so and apologized for any offense caused. But one of them was fired anyway out of a total lack or sense of proportion. Her tweeting these two gentleman was also out of all proportion to whatever offense they might have caused. She needs to be taught a lesson in several ways and for several reasons: to make her develop a sense of proportion herself, to let her know how she made the two gentle…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:12 PM
2

Okay, I read it again, just to be on the safe side. Fascism was an idealistic and ideological fantasy that, like similar ideological fantasies, provided the ideological justification and apology for totalitarianism in states like Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, Maoist China and the Leninist Soviet Union. The all-or-nothing idealism creates an environment where an opportunistic sociopath can rise to the top of 'the movement', purging and exterminating competing leaders, and eventually distorting the…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:02 PM
13

This isn't the first time we've read stories like this, but what I found particularly disturbing in this one was the choice of language by the author. Note the choice of words: the woman didn't try to 'cut off' her husband's penis, she tried to 'cut' it. The woman is described as 'went berserk', almost as a subtle attempt to excuse her actions. Bobbit's husband's penis is described as 'recovered and re-attached to her spouse', almost as if a body part is nothing more than a lifeless hood ornamen…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:28 PM
1

Um...fascism? Didn't Europe try that once...? Who IS this guy?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:04 PM
6

It seems to me that perhaps Ms. Spenrath and B.C. women/men in the same boat should contact their MLA and lobby for an amendment to the new Act to include a 'voluntary opting-out' clause. This is just as much a women's freedom issue as much as it is a men's freedom issue...if some women want to live with their partner but not be defined as married, they should be able to do so without having their marital status arbitrarily defined by the state.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 02:34 AM
2

It's not only sexist, it's wrong: The image of women as safer managers less likely to fritter away a bank’s finances is wrong – and politicians should take note, according to a research study by Germany's Bundesbank...based on an analysis of German bank executive teams from 1994 to 2010, the report’s authors suggest a major reason is that women executives tend to be “significantly less experienced” than male counterparts, and that lack of experience drives risk taking. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/…
/r/MensRights17/03/13 08:46 AM
3

Amusingly, I can't help but note you had an opportunity to white-white knight him right back, and you let it pass. As soon as the woman came up to you with the clips, you should have said to her, "Would you come with me, please?" Then you should have walked up to the guy and gestured, "This woman was through with her clips. It was her business whether to let me use the clips, not yours. Don't interfere with her decisions again." and walked away.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 10:12 PM
3

Right away, within the second or third paragraph, this guy completely undermines his essay and demonstrates he's going to write about what he ASSUMES about the MRM, not what he actually knows or has researched. He goes ahead and says that the MRM is about 'male, heterosexual rights', when anyone who visits this forum regularly knows this is not true; many MRM supporters are gay. This is opinion and prejudice masquerading as scholarship. Thanks for dismissing yourself so quickly, Mr. Wright. Next…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:00 AM
1

I would suggest that the bully metaphor is actually very helpful in understanding some aspects of misandrist feminism and feminism-based harassment. One aspect of bullying is that the bully seems to have, or expresses, an unrealistically high opinion of themself disporportionate with social reality and reasonable standards of how people treat each other. They feel entitled - ENTITLED - to accuse, verbally or physically abuse, and inflict pain on others in order to generate a conflict that will r…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 04:19 AM
17

If I were you, I would sit down TODAY with pen and paper and write a letter to your principal, explaining in detail what happened and detailing how you were treated by the principal. Then, I would include all the details of how you were treated by the counselor, how the counselor discriminated against you, and explain that you do not feel confident that this counselor can treat you or any other student fairly should a similar incident arise in the future. Send it by registered mail, if possible,…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 02:20 PM
7

Amazing, actually. The article's author tries to counter the studied opinions of a published, tenured professor at U. of O. with the opinions of an 'internet animator and full-time feminist'...who completely talks past Fiamengo's thesis that feminism has changed from the pursuit of equality to the pursuit of women’s power, and instead makes vague assertions about 'systemic issues' and that 'we should all be supporting feminism'. As if feminism is somehow immune from closer scrutiny. The positive…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:27 AM
2

We use the term she/her when referring to the person being abused and he/him when referring to the abuser. This is because by far the vast majority of sexual and intimate partner violence is perpetrated by men against women. We do wish to acknowledge that men can and have been victimized by women and that violence and abuse in the context of same sex relationships is also a reality." There is one little problem with this line of reasoning. It arbitrarily creates a hierarchy of more important/les…
/r/MensRights04/02/13 05:02 PM
2

Well, not if the investigator thought the two women were deliberately trying to file false complaints in order to frame the two men. The investigating detective was never interviewed in the video, so we can't be sure.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 09:50 AM
3

It got a lot of coverage in Canada last year because it was used to elicit a confession from Russel Williams, a Colonel in the Canadian Armed Forces who committed murder and rape. Strange that it's used on people who file a complaint with the police...it suggests poor training on the part of the investigator in the above case, misapplication of an interrogation technique, or the investigator genuinely thought the two women were lying and trying to frame their sex partners.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 09:47 AM
6

In Reid Technique, the first thing the investigator says is something like, "All the evidence points to you..." or "There is no doubt in my mind that..." as part of an attempt to elicit a confession. It's possible the investigator was attempting to elicit an admission from the women that they made the story up and/or were filing a false rape report. In which case, the investigator may charge the women with filing a false rape/sexual assault report. The fact that the investigator didn't charge th…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 05:53 AM
7

There's a lot of strange psychological things going on here...one of them seems to be cognitive dissonance. Apparently the women in this case, as well as the so-called sexual assault workers, either can't seem to understand or refuse to admit that some women lie about rape. And as a result, when the police - who do see cases of women lying about rape or sexual coercion (think of the Karla Homolka case in Canada), determine that a rape didn't take place, these women assume the police think ALL wo…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 02:13 AM
2

Agreed.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 02:29 AM
3

Newfoundland, not Nova Scotia.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 03:58 PM
2

gayrebel, I used to have a bit anal about separating gay rights issues from MRA issues, not in the sense that they are mutually-exclusive, but that both are simply different ways of addressing the same basic issue, namely, human rights. Then I saw all those wingnuts on the video about the Toronto protest...these anti-male nutcases claiming that people like me are homophobic, against people color, and even 'ablist'. Like, WTF? MRAs are against equal rights for disabled people? WHERE do these peop…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:10 PM
2

Normally I would side with the argument that the woman should go to jail for attemting to hire a contract killer...if it weren't for the fact that this incident took place in Nova Scotia. Nova Scotia's justice system is, in many ways, at the level of a third-world country - and until recently it wasn't much better as a safe place for women to live, IMHO. Some relevant criminal cases/situations that have taken place over the past 25 years: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westray_Mine http://stephenk…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 04:44 PM
2

Very insightful commentary. It makes you think about the whole psychological process of judging. Judging seems to be a process whereby person A attempts to reset the social, psychological and personal value of person B. It's so powerful a process (apparently) that it has been formalized into a justice system in order to regulate it. But it also functions on a personal/interpersonal level. When person A judges person B, they're attempting to reset person B's value in the eyes of society, as well …
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:51 AM
10

Is it safe to assume that the SFU Women's Center's budget and outline of programming is on file? If so, I would suggest getting a copy of it and having a look at its structure. I'd also, if I were you, check to see if they have to submit their outline of programming before funds are released to them as well.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 09:25 AM
1

The reason why I posted this was, there were so many 'editorials' after the Sandy Hook shooting bemoaning the 'inherent violent nature of men', yet when two men (teachers) take their lives into their hands to protect their students by confronting a gunman, there is nary a word said. The violent males are lauded while the heros are ignored. Why this isn't on the front page of every website in the USA is inexcusable.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:20 PM
1

I wrote her a response...it was on her blog for a short time 'pending approval' but it looks like I didn't pass muster Poor me. :) Here's what I wrote: Ah, yes...the ever-popular re-writing and cherry-picking of men in history in order to paint men as inherently bad and women as inherently good. And who have we overlooked this time...Stewart Brand, who asked, 'Why haven't we seen a picture of the whole earth yet?'...William Anders, the Apollo 8 astronaut who took that famous picture of the Earth…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 07:30 PM
15

My instructor walked in, and gave me a disgusted look. "If you're going to sit in my classroom and do that," she sneered, "you might as well go home right now and get back in the kitchen. Or did your husband allow you to leave for the day?" Boy oh boy oh boy...I haven't read the rest of what you wrote above yet, because this, just this...has got me steaming here right now. Your professor had NO GODDAM RIGHT to speak to you that way. She demeaned you as a person, demeaned you as a student, demean…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:05 PM
1

Love the hat and the scarf. Reminds me of this poor kid: http://www.comedy.co.uk/images/library/people/180x200/a/about_a_boy_marcus.jpg
/r/MensRights31/12/12 09:38 AM
3

Tres bizarre, no? There is something really strange about this guy's blog, beyond the obvious...mangina-ing, self-loathing, white-knighting. On the one hand his sentences are all grammatically correct with correct spelling...but the thought processes and reasoning are so jumbled and strange. Reading his blog, I get this impression of a PC that has had it's original OS deleted...and then replaced with a poorer-quality OS, not suitable for the hardware specs, that was improperly or incompletely in…
/r/MensRights29/12/12 06:16 PM
3

Part of the solution is supporting and building ourselves up as men. Seldom are their positive posts about success stories or how we can make better effort in our local community. This. Right there.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 01:28 PM
10

I don't really engage in fights or discussions about MRM explicitly with people around me, partly because it would be pointless, and it's also a good idea to choose your battles. Otherwise you exhaust yourself.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 01:25 PM
1

I understand how you're feeling, but I think it's worth pointing out that being MRA can also simply be a mindset rather than being...some kind of warrior or activist all the time. Sometimes to myself I define 'MRA' as 'male respect advocate' rather than 'mens rights activist', in that I'd be satisfied with a world and an environment around me that treats men with equal respect as women. That would be enough. And I also think that becoming 'MRA' is also an internal thing...unlocking or untangling…
/r/MensRights24/12/12 01:21 PM
6

A suggestion for the future: secretly record each and every conversation you have with your wife and/or her lover from now on. Get her to admit that she lied about the assault. Save the tapes in a safe place and give them to your children when they grow up and reach the age of majority. They have a RIGHT to know you are a good father, even if it will take years for them to find out. See, people who pull this shit don't realize this is the kind of stuff you can't keep bottled up forever. They jus…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 01:33 PM
3

By being unashamedly ourselves and if someone challenges your self worth, rip the piss out of them. I would disagree with you slightly in that if someone challenges your self worth, make your response appropriate and show them the error of their ways. Make them think about their actions. Get them thinking. Because most people are pretty reasonable, and just getting them to have a 'red pill' moment might be enough to make a new ally. Just look at how many people have subscribed to Mensrights in t…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 01:22 PM
5

Very good point. And by pretending to be in a 'relationship' with a beer, the guy was subconsciously pointing out the absurdity of valuing being in a relationship as an end in itself, rather than placing value on the KIND of person the relationship is with. And you're right about the woman being taught that this kind of cutsey romance is what she is supposed to seek and aspire to. It extends even to how women are taught to approach their wedding versus how men are taught to approach it...all the…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:59 PM
1

Ahh, I get it! You're the chick in the video, aren't you.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:49 PM
0

Nope! Not at all, and I hear ya. EDIT: you know, now that I think of it, that video would also have been pretty cool if it was the WOMAN holding/kissing the beer instead of the man. Like, why can't a woman send the same message - that you don't have to be in a relationship to be valued and have a sense of self-worth. The message would have been less pointed in some ways, because - IMHO - society is a bit more judgemental about men being comfortable on their own than women being comfortable on th…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 04:33 AM
6

Yes! I found the video for this on Youtube, you can see she finally gets the joke and starts laughing at the end, as if to say, 'oh well'.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 03:09 AM
0

Possibly. Buttt....that woman doesn't seem to be acting at all. For the sake of argument even if it were staged, it's still an interesting little 'morality tale'.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:25 AM
19

Your male-positive agenda obviously. Um...you do know this forum is called 'men's rights'...right? And...being male-positive is a problem because...?
/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:06 PM
12

Okay point taken. :-) I phrased that badly...it's a humorous stereotype that men care more about beer than about anything else, and the guy milked it for a good laugh.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 03:58 PM
18

Wasn't really trying to 'gender-shame' the woman...in fact, her body language reminds me a lot of an aunt of mine, she would probably react in much the same way...except that my aunt would probably break out laughing once she got the joke, and pat the guy on the shoulder. Maybe she's laughing now, now that the gif has gone viral, I don't know. Perhaps he was making loud gulping noises as he drank the beer, which grossed her out a bit. But from her body language, doesn't it seem a bit like she's …
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:28 PM
34

Nothing more? Then why is she cringing? And what is my agenda?
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:22 PM
281

There just seems to be so many interesting levels to this little tale...the camera operator putting the two people in the heart, and apparently putting the woman from the couple on the left in accidentally. The woman seems hopeful that the camera will pan over and put her and her bf in the picture together. That the moment will be all about her. The guy on the right is cast in the role of 'rejected unattractive loser'...instead, he rewrites the script on the spot. Notice how he raises his eyebro…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 12:03 PM
1

Except that if they were not legally culpable for their actions, they would never have been court-martialed. And the general in charge of the prison was a woman. It was ultimately her responsibility for what was going on there, and it all happened right under her nose. Either she approved of it, knew of it and didn't care, or wasn't competent to manage the troops under her command.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:48 AM
5

...but please, why make a big deal of a woman using this tragedy as an example of how the nation just might need a different perspective - clearly what the mostly male legislature is doing isn't working. To a certain extent I agree with you, if the specific issue you're talking about is gun control rather than violence in/directed at schools. But I think it's worth pointing out a significant number of gun owners, and supporters/members of the NRA are female. Not all U.S. men are in favor of the …
/r/MensRights15/12/12 10:39 AM
23

Wow that didn't take long. One of my favorite writers is Barbara Ehrenreich...she is described as "an American feminist, democratic socialist, and political activist who describes herself as "a myth buster by trade", and has been called "a veteran muckraker" by The New Yorker. In 2004, she wrote a great piece about women soldiers who participated in the torture of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib, and what it says about the idea that moral superiority or human kindness is gendered. Below is what sh…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 08:44 AM
1

Interesting! I didn't realize libel extended to electronic media now...I assumed that because her offense was issued verbally, it was slander rather than libel. I can't help but think, however, a letter or two from a lawyer threatening a lawsuit would throw a good scare into her and have a maturing effect. Or even a restraining order. In any case, let me take this opportunity to congratulate you for handling her assault so well. Well done!
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:21 AM
7

You have a point there, I must admit.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:37 AM
0

And she shouldn't be doxxed, or just doxxed...if I were the guy in the video I would have sued for slander.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:36 AM
2

Interesting, I didn't know that, thanks. Also interesting, though, that the organizers of the protest have made no public response to the U of T's statement on the whole incident. Also interesting that the UTSU made no response either, since they were the first out of the starting gate with their 'statement' on the Warren Farrell talk.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:35 AM
2

To each his own. When I said 'I'm not sure', I meant it literally...I see your point, and yes I think someone who comes right out and calls someone 'fucking scum' for no good reason at all should be judged appropriately. But if one of the protesters ends up physically harmed by someone who didn't like them in the video...it could cast the MRM in a bad light. As I said, I'm not sure. It just strikes me as odd - or revealing - that these people all seem to have run off and hidden somewhere. If the…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:54 AM
3

Uhhhh, no. You shouldn't buy his records if you don't like his music.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:47 AM
6

Justin Bieber has become one of the most well-known entertainers in the world. Just yesterday it was reported the police in the US caught two psychopaths who hatched a plan to kill and castrate Bieber. I mean stuff like that.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:14 AM
2

Translation from coded language: "Fuck you MRAs because it turns out you have a point, and we can't bash men with impunity anymore."
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:41 AM
1

"The Southern Poverty Law Center has designated r/mensrights as a hate hub (lie number 1). Due to MRA tactics of harassment (lie number 2), intimidation (lie number 3) and violence (lie number 4), we strongly urge readers to take measures to protect their personal safety before engaging with MRAs." Translation: "We really hate these bastards because they actually think of women as their equals, there's 54 times as many of them as there are of us on Reddit, and too many people in the general publ…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:40 PM
2

I used to think that one could make a distinction between issues of gay men and MRA issues, but the whole recent experience of the University of Toronto Warren Farrell freedom-of-speech-crushing mob has got me thinking. These people who are against MRA (which for me means 'Mens Respect Advocacy' just as much as it means Mens Rights Advocate) blithely assume that anyone who is MRA is automatically against equal rights for gays, people of non-WASP ethnicity, or the physically challenged. WHERE the…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:02 PM
-1

If I were you, I'd talk to a lawyer and see if it is too late to sue the high school for sexual harassment. Start a class-action suit. Get all the boys you graduated with together and press a suit. Don't ask for money, demand a written apology as your settlement.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:41 AM
10

Here's the biggest lie they made: "The picket was met with aggression from those attending the event and eventually a large police presence." As far as I can see in the video nobody attending the event behaved in an aggressive manner...quite the opposite, the picketers forcibly prevented people from entering the event.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:28 AM
4

Actually I saw this story in the Toronto Star yesterday, and for a labor/left newspaper they seem to be trying to do a very neutral, balanced job of covering it. Kudos to them. http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/1297641--father-of-three-quebec-children-found-dead-in-mother-s-home-enduring-inexplicable-pain Or is it the same story? The police haven't charged anybody in the above case yet.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:30 AM
1

Oh, I agree...just, it occured to me that, although I'm not a postmodernist by any means, this situation could be seen as an example of what they call "structuring" gender. That some people - you and I excluded - might dismiss, see as funny, or trivialize, violence and destruction of property when its done by an offended female. And if so, why is it that many feminists ignore negative female behavior or attempt to justify it...?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 02:33 PM
-5

You know...from a postmodernist perspective, one could almost say this photo highlights the way that gender, and society's perception of gender, is socially constructed rather than innate. Most people would respond relatively more negatively to a man destroying or vandalizing his ex's property, and somehow it seems more 'accepted' or 'explainable' that a woman would do it. Why? If, as many feminists and postmodernists suggest, gender is socially constructed, then why is the female gender so cons…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 01:11 PM
0

Thanks for that clarification...I guess sometimes I worry that the MRA movement can deteriorate into something that is merely anti-feminist, rather than focus on issues that are of concern to the status of men. The only way I can see that this woman's attitudes have any effect on men's lives is, as you pointed out, they fuck up the dating and relationship environment for everybody. The workplace environment too, I would think.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:37 AM
0

When I see articles/screeds like this, and the responses, to a certain extent I have trouble seeing what this has to do with MRA issues, or the concerns of men. The only direction I see this woman should go is to learn more about men's concerns, men's perspectives and men's issues. I'm not so naive or egotistical to think I know everything that women want, and I think she should feel the same. And I agree with what AnthonyZarat wrote here, it's hard for me to see why any male is obligated to pla…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 04:38 PM
5

I loved this one: Treat Us As Individuals What we want, how we react, our dreams, desires, lives, etc… Guess what? They’re just as diverse as yours. What non-privileged people want is the right to all of the life choices that privileged groups have. In order for you, as a privileged person, to assure that, you need to not try to control our choices because of tradition, or your personal morals, or what have you. We have just as much of a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as yo…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 04:56 PM
3

Very well put.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 04:48 PM
7

It seems like part of the problem is that when people first hear the expression "mens rights", they seem to interpret it as men wanting MORE rights than women. That the obverse of the expression "mens rights" is "women less/no rights". As a result sometimes I think of myself as more of a Mens Respect Advocate (MRA) rather than Mens Rights Activist.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 02:35 PM
8

THIS. History should neither be forgotten, nor should it be cherry-picked. And history should never be used as an excuse for creating new injustices and inequalities.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 02:32 PM
5

The basic problem with arguing that "discrimination A" is justified by thousands of years of "discrimination B" is that there are an infinite number of "historical injustices" in the historical record. Within the living memory of most of the people on this forum, blacks and gays were discriminated against. In the 1940s, Japanese-Americans were rounded up and put into prison camps. Way back when, Native Americans were systematically destroyed. Even further back, native peoples of Siberia were con…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 05:08 AM
10

We should all get together and organize a legal fund to sue people like this. Raise a big pile of money, and anytime someone goes to jail because they've been falsely accused of rape, make the money available so that they can sue the accuser.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:14 AM
2

I first saw this video yesterday on another link, and the self-righteous vulgarity of this speaker has been stuck in the back of my mind ever since. She makes lie after lie after lie, and the person interviewing her never calls her on any of them or asks her for the slightest evidence to back up her statements. She claims Warren Farrell promotes hate speech, yet she does nothing but spew lies and hate speech from the moment she opens her mouth. And can anyone explain to me how an event about how…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:17 PM
2

A few hours later...I have to admit that yours is the more intelligent and productive/positive response, mine the more emotional one. As you said, best case scenario the men's rights movement gains another ally. The shock value of suggesting the OP doesn't have to explain or justify anything about being a man and telling the gf she will have no part of him if she can't respect him as a human being and equal...might only be effective with large numbers of men. Although it would be nice to see.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 05:42 PM
3

Hate to be a devil's advocate here, but, IMHO...No. 100% disagree. Men don't OWE women an explanation for anything. If a woman is unwilling to accept you as an equal human being, then deny her the privilege of you being in her life. Unload her and let her know why she doesn't deserve you. Value yourself, first and foremost.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 08:53 AM
3

Okay. Let's turn that around: "If a man lives with a woman, and he desires another woman and decides to throw the first woman out of the house, that is his prerogative. A man has the right to decide who gets to live in his house. Anything less is misandry." "If a man lives with a woman, and he decides to implant his seed in another woman, that is his prerogative. It is his seed, his genetic material, and he has every right to choose what to do with it and with whom he can reproduce." "If a man l…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 03:30 AM
1

This is incredibly smug and intellectually inferior. I can replace MRA with feminist and the meaning would not change. You generalise females just as much as males in this post. Nope. Lots of MRAs are female, and there is even a subreddit on this forum called LadyMRA. Being MRA means you believe in the values of fairness and justice, values which both men and women are capable of supporting.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 04:51 AM
1

...you seemed to be identifying membership in these groups as demographic characteristics and pointing out that members of these demographic characteristics are not necessarily representative of the whole (otherwise, why would you mention them?) No, you're taking my statement out of context. I mentioned these as examples - last examples - that the world is a complex place. On an individual level, there are no such things as people who are all good or all bad. MRAs realize this. There are bad mot…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 01:57 AM
2

Being/not being MRA is a viewpoint, a thought-out paradigm. It's not an arbitrary demographic characteristic, like race, gender, nationality, or sexual orientation. There is nothing inherently good or bad about any of those demographic characteristics, any more than it's inherently good or bad to be left-handed. So arbitrarily classifying an entire demographic as 'good' or 'bad' or saying that 'it's not safe to sit children beside members of this demographic category' is just morally repugnant, …
/r/MensRights18/08/12 07:17 PM
11

Kind of a strange screed, isn't it. "The world is either MRA or feminist". "If you're in favor of equality for men, it means you are against equality for women". Strange guy...it's like he can't operate without a bagload of ideological assumptions, and he's describing in great detail how he exchanged one for the other. Well, more power to him. Thanks for playing. Being MRA is not about being anti-feminist, it derives from a basic belief in equality and a basic belief in the decency of men. It do…
/r/MensRights18/08/12 04:37 PM
6

I was trying to find an interview she did after writing her book, I read it a while back but couldn't find it on the Internet...basically it was to the effect that she developed a lot more respect for men after disguising herself as one...she respected the accepting, nonjudgemental attitude that men gave her as a man, and gave to each other. And she said, 'men are hurting nowadays', for a lot of reasons. She took on the role of a man, learned a little bit of what it was like to be one, the good …
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:32 PM
-2

I think Norah Vincent's experience would be relevant to your question. She probably has a better perspective on the advantages and disadvantages of manhood better than anyone else: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/22/books/review/22kamp.html
/r/MensRights17/08/12 11:09 AM
11

You were perfectly within your rights to call the police on her. Ask to speak to the manager of the store, explain what happened, identify the time and suggest the store watch out for the woman and suggest they check their video footage, and that she made you and your children feel very uncomfortable. Ask for the store address, and write a detailed letter to the manager - not as a complaint - but as a statement of what happened, how it made you feel uncomfortable, how it made your children feel …
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:59 AM
3

Well, since it happened today, obviously she hasn't been prosecuted yet. IMHO, the incident is an MRA issue because domestic and intimate partner violence is often depicted as primarily male-on-female, and this incident is obviously the latter. It can also be interpreted as an MRA issue in the sense that the police and public response is a sign that society is more willing to recognize men can be the victims in domestic violence than in the past. Notice that none of the articles in today's press…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:58 PM
2

Regardless of whether or not the bride intended to kill her fiancee, there is something fundamentally wrong with the mindset of this woman. In the fact that she somehow assumes that just because an argument ensues, she's justified in picking up a deadly weapon and assaulting someone, twice, with it. I'm grateful for the fact that in my life, I can't think of any woman I know personally who would ever do something like that. Well, she's in her own personal hell now, and she's never going to get o…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 02:43 PM
9

"The charges against Johnson came as the U.S. Justice Department is investigating the handling of more than 80 reported rapes in Missoula, many of them not related to the campus, during the past three years. The investigation is tied to complaints by unnamed sources that authorities were failing to aggressively investigate sexual assault claims. That probe and an investigation by the U.S. Department of Education is set to examine how officials at the 15,600-student campus in western Montana resp…
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:47 PM
2

I suppose it's an open question as to whether feminism is really about gender equality...I think most feminists are basically in favor of it, and to their credit a great many of them are willing to open their minds these days and listen to discussions about gender equality from a man's viewpoint. But it certainly seems that for some self-described feminists, feminism is not about freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 02:58 AM
2

Okay, she was protesting. But why was she arrested?
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:29 PM
2

Sounds like a good idea!
/r/MensRights01/08/12 11:23 AM
9

This is all in hindsight, but here goes: As soon as the cop said, "Please step away from the child.", I would have said, "Who are you and what do you want? You're dressed like a police officer, but for all I know you could be a pedophile in disguise. What is your name and your badge number? What is your legal justification for stopping me and my family and accosting me on the street? " Next: "Assuming you really are a police officer, you may ask my daughter some questions. Do not touch her. Do n…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:47 AM
1

Some of us don't. IMHO, it's not up to ME to justify MRA to some constipated, ambivalent "radical feminist". They're just looking for attention. EDIT RESPONSE TO NORTHERNSKEPTIC: there's a difference between preaching to the choir, the genuinely curious and open-minded, and the "self-identified radical feminist". And it's easy to distinguish between the latter two. Usually the SIRF is full of turgid prose and tortured justifications and explanations for posting here, as though the MRA thought po…
/r/MensRights30/07/12 05:50 AM
1

Well, without getting into an argument, I'd have to respectfully disagree. The whole point about having equality as an inherent element in our legal and social system is to make difference irrelevant, when it comes to human rights. Some might argue that gays and lesbians are biologically different; whether or not they are is irrelevant. They should, and do, have equal rights to life, liberty and security of the person, etc. The degree to which women and men are biologically different is, IMHO, i…
/r/MensRights28/07/12 02:14 AM
0

Actually, as an MRA, Barbara Ehrenreich is one feminist I can respect. Here's what she had to say about Abu Ghraib: What we have learned from Abu Ghraib, once and for all, is that a uterus is not a substitute for a conscience. This doesn't mean gender equality isn't worth fighting for for its own sake. It is. If we believe in democracy, then we believe in a woman's right to do and achieve whatever men can do and achieve, even the bad things. It's just that gender equality cannot, all alone, brin…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 04:02 PM
1

Given the age of the guy and his background, it seems to be like he's being 'accidentally sexist', and accidentally damning the male gender with faint praise. He lauds the men that sacrificed themselves to save their female partners as examples that "men can still recognize what it means to be a good man and act like one"...making a number of unexamined assumptions: a) that it was ALWAYS a man's job to sacrifice his life for a female or child; b) that any man who did not sacrifice himself, or so…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 11:47 AM
12

Whenever I hear about an incident like the Aurora shooting... 1) The first thing I do is turn and run in the other direction, as fast as possible. Duck all the CNN bullshit, all the Larry King interviews, all the axe-grinding editorials, the whole media circus. 2) Then, a year later, I look up the details on Wikipedia...then and only then think about all the implications.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:46 PM
1

I noticed that since yesterday, the comments have been disabled and you can't see how many people approve of the video versus disapprove anymore. The nice thing is, you can also see the full video here, which also gives information on the ad agency and director/producer. http://adsoftheworld.com/media/tv/canadian_womens_foundation_its_a_girl I think we should do a little research on this agency and see how many other similar commercials they have made. As an aside, notice how they put a "rape wh…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:11 AM
11

I've noticed that a lot of the times when people criticize others, they subconsiously and inadvertently admit the things they should be doing themselves. "You do that a lot, maybe you really need to re-evaluate the things you say" almost sounds like she's saying subconsiously "I'm angry that you're making me re-evaluate the things I say." There seems to be some weird issues of "pride" versus "low self-esteem" going on here. If you're male and straight, there's nothing wrong with being happy with…
/r/MensRights08/07/12 08:06 AM
40

Another thing you can do to support the husband is carefully write down what you heard Maria tell your wife. Then go to a notary public and swear out an affadavit (sp?) affirming what you heard to be true, and make sure it is dated today. BEFORE anything happens. If it ever comes up that the husband is falsely accused of violence against Maria, your affadavit can be submitted as evidence of her intention to defraud the government before the fact.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 01:06 PM
5

Just thinking out loud here...I wonder what she would have done, and/or how she would have reacted, if the cop was a female? Three questions: 1) Would she still have cried if the cop was a female? 2) Would she still have complained if the female cop gave her a ticket anyway? 3) Would the female cop have let her off because she was crying? Just wondering...
/r/MensRights08/06/12 08:27 AM
4

Folks can you help me out here? I don't understand exactly what a SRS subreddit is. I visited the SRS "forum", and saw a lot of other subreddits, 'SRSCanada' etc. Is the whole idea to somehow 'shame' people for saying certain things that are considered 'unacceptable'? If so, who gets to decide what's unacceptable and what isn't? These are just electrons in cyberspace, after all...what's the big deal?
/r/MensRights07/06/12 03:47 PM
0

"But in this case I do not believe any action out of maybe a firing is in order." Agreed, but I would also suggest she never be allowed to teach again. And the same thing should happen - no more or less - to a male teacher doing the same thing with a female student. "The only question is, will they do the same to a male teacher in the same circumstance. While I'd bet against it, that situation isn't presented in this case, which means no men are actively being discriminated against with this act…
/r/MensRights06/06/12 04:02 PM
7

I think there are two MRA aspects to this story. The first, and more obvious one, is how society seems to respond to female teachers who have sex with or rape students, versus how society responds to male teachers who do the same. I do not for one moment suggest that society should become more lenient towards the latter; instead, teachers - regardless of gender or sexual orientation - should be held to a high standard of behavior towards students and children. It may not be very harmful for a 25…
/r/MensRights06/06/12 12:20 PM
10

Well I appreciate the energy and enthusiasm of your response, but unfortunately you've let your enthusiasm get the better of your thinking and wording. The...ad, image, message, whatever...is offensive on many levels, not the least of which is its sheer stupidity. It isn't specifically placed in a place where rapists are known to occur. It's placed in a place where anyone having a penis - men, 5 year-old boys, seniors, police officers, doctors, therapists, i.e., the 99.9 percent of males who hav…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 12:47 PM
1

Something like this is just bound to encourage a dedicated psychopath. They'd just be encouraged by such a lame response.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 12:30 PM
5

The other thing about these things...a restroom is just about the most private place imaginable where people take care of personal body functions, even public restrooms. Appropriating a space like this to shill an issue is pretty invasive and presumptuous. We don't even see commercial advertisements in most restrooms, at least not in the stalls and the urinals. And this thing...what is the point? To try to shame someone for having a penis, no more or less. It's outrageously sexist. Suppose some …
/r/MensRights29/05/12 12:26 PM
2

Oh, poor Dr. Zimbardo. He's plugging his new book so much because apparently he spent too much time writing it, it's now way behind the times, circa Guyland 2008. Men can decide for themselves what they want, they don't need self-selected "experts" telling them how to be happy. I don't think he means to, but he seems to be falling into Manginaland. I'd take him a lot more seriously if he wrote about a REAL men's problem, like some of the issues and problems the black fathers are facing that ndue…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 12:21 PM
1

There is a certain strange sensation, I don't know if there is any name for it. Basically it's a mixture of excitement/tension that results when someone seriously advocates an idea that is so ridiculous or against common sense as to be completely unrealistic or impossible. The person listening to the idea is left so stunned at the stupidity that they make no response, which just encourages the advocate to continue asserting the idea is possible or desirable. It's actually a form of intellectual …
/r/MensRights28/05/12 12:49 AM
1

Guys, am I the only one around here that has already LEFT this kind of thinking behind, and realized a)false rape accusations occur, not often although devastating when they do, b) women are also capable of violence, sexual assault, murder c) real equality means treating the opposite gender as your equal, whether they like it or not? It's not us average males that need to grow up. It's him.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 06:20 AM
1

I didn't get though the article. Is it just me, or does "Dr. Zimbardo's" picture - that dye job, the tacky mustache, the head lovingly turned to one side, the doughy eyes - scream MANGINA? Blech...talking to him must feel like somebody is pouring warm yoghurt down the back of your shirt.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 01:19 AM
16

I believe you. Several years ago I briefly dated a black woman who had a 7 year-old daughter; we got along fine except that once in a while she would say the father was 'no good' and a really bad father. I didn't question anything that she said about him and black fathers in general, but I did wonder...what happened? How did he end up not in his partner's and daughter's life anymore? What was he really like? Being white, I didn't know at the time how to think about it or approach the issue, but …
/r/MensRights23/05/12 04:10 AM
24

As a white male, I've noticed a lot of indicators of this over the years...movies like 'Waiting to Exhale', a lot of nasty comments by black female talk show hosts, and a lot of general stereotypes that black children are "usually fatherless because ALL black men are bad fathers".
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:07 AM
6

You make a good point there. The assumption that all white males, for example, are 'privileged' ignores or attempts to render irrelevant the personal experiences of those labeled. I don't doubt for a moment that a significant number of people started out life with a lot of advantages, relatively speaking. But where is the 'privilege' of being white, male and poor? White, male and disabled? White, male and mentally handicapped?
/r/MensRights20/05/12 03:10 PM
9

Except that: a) women aren't a minority on university campuses anymore, including SFU. b) you can't demonstrate that the advocates of the Men's Center on the Simon Fraser campus have said anything remotely negative or racist against minorities. In fact, I suspect if you ask them, they would say the center is just as much for men of color and other minority men as it is for white males. It's true that YouTube is known for some extreme statements in its comments section of each video, a lot of whi…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 04:53 PM
2

Actually I've seen a few hints that this place might just turn into a mangina training center. I was kind of hoping the misandrists at SFU might be dumb enough to shoot themselves in the foot by preventing the center from opening. What the MRM needs is a nice, sympathetic, sugar daddy to finance real men's centers on campus, free and clear of university funding and politics. THAT would be awesome.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 08:30 AM
10

I think you make a good point here. It seems like the only reason why any feminists are objecting to a male birth control pill - like it's any of their business anyway - is from the standpoint of how it affects women. Apparently some of them are "against" a pill for men because it would somehow negatively affect their reproductive freedom. In any case, any feminist's "objection" or "viewpoint" on a male birth control pill should be superfluous and irrelevant. As you pointed out, the purpose is t…
/r/MensRights15/05/12 03:45 PM
5

Isn't the title rather sexist? It assumes that a man's only purpose in life is to give women orgasms, and that if a woman can get an orgasm without a man, "men are no longer required". First of all, since WHEN have men been necessary for a woman to have an orgasm? It's not a matter of plugging one nervous system into another, AKA Avatar. Men have never been necessary for women to have orgasms, the same way women have never been necessary for men to have orgasms. It's called masturbation. Second,…
/r/MensRights13/05/12 05:14 PM
2

Not sure...and in all honesty, while I deplore the way the woman is acting, I don't think it's anyone's business on this forum to get involved. I think she's a little crazy to be posting in so much detail how she's..what's the verb? browbeating? manipulating? LYING to her husband to get him to agree to have a baby. It's like a man blogging in great detail how he's talking his SO into having a boob job she doesn't want. She's being so out there about it, it's bound to be discovered by the husband…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 04:34 PM
2

Oops, my mistake, sorry. Thought airodynamic was addressing me.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 02:22 AM
2

Nope, just can't think of a better one. I just think it's interesting and encouraging that the number of regular readers of this forum is growing so fast.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:31 AM
2

I'm not exacty sure, either, but if you have a username and log in, there is a green 'subscribe' button on the right hand menu. I'm assuming if you press it, it means you are saying you read this forum regularly. One hundred new regular readers a day seems like a lot to me.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:30 AM
3

Back in the 80s when I was in college, my girlfriend at the time showed me that book. Brownmiller was one of the first feminist writers to suggest the idea that all men in all societies use rape as a means of social control over all women. I still keep in touch with the ex-girlfriend who has gone on to become a college professor, and she doesn't have much good to say about Brownmiller anymore. And a lot of the research she quoted in 1975 seems to have been refuted by later studies. In fairness, …
/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:26 AM
5

I can't wait to see what happens when somebody finally shows the husband the blog.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:15 AM
92

I live in Japan, and I saw something the very opposite of this happen yesterday. I was buying a memory card in a large department store for my camera when I saw a man walking up to the checkout holding a young boy's hand. My Japanese is limited but from what I could understand, the man explained the boy was lost and the man was not his father. The three ladies at the checkout got the kid's mother's number, called the mom and wiped away the boy's tears. Mom came and got the kid, thanked the man f…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 04:56 AM
2

Ahh ok.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 01:00 AM
3

mr throwaway, may I ask why you blanked out the teacher's name in the photo? If the teacher feels what he is doing is justified, there shouldn't be anything wrong with publishing his full name/username on imgur.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 12:06 PM
5

My initial reaction was one of assuming she was just an asshole, then it hit me. If she was simply pissed off about her daughter horsing around on the bus she wouldn't have told ME to stop, she'd have told her daughter. She was telling ME to stop because she was telling me that I'm a pedophile, or creep or inappropriate or any other thing that I'm not. That's exactly what she was doing. I can't believe the nerve of this woman, turning around and ordering you to stop, like you're her dog or somet…
/r/MensRights03/05/12 05:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter