TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Clemicus Archive

View 112 posts and 3,205 comments by Clemicus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2615

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights11/09/22 03:40 PM
1098

Clemicus/r/MensRights05/12/22 01:16 AM
620

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights20/05/22 07:23 PM
557

ProgressClemicus/r/MensRights02/12/21 06:05 PM
531

Edu./Occu.Clemicus/r/MensRights22/09/24 08:32 PM
489

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights22/12/24 02:06 PM
317

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights28/07/22 06:35 PM
274

Activism/SupportClemicus/r/MensRights14/03/25 11:39 PM
267

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights24/03/24 01:11 PM
186

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights12/04/25 02:34 PM
179

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights22/04/22 10:43 PM
159

Social IssuesClemicus/r/MensRights22/04/25 09:14 PM
158

news/opinion articleClemicus/r/EverydayMisandry02/11/25 06:54 PM
143

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights08/11/24 12:52 PM
133

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights07/07/24 10:29 AM
111

social mediaClemicus/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/24 09:37 PM
110

legal rightsClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/25 04:58 PM
107

articleClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/22 10:36 AM
105

Social IssuesClemicus/r/MensRights04/05/25 11:01 AM
103

social mediaClemicus/r/EverydayMisandry15/01/26 08:36 PM
103

mediaClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 05:48 PM
103

social mediaClemicus/r/EverydayMisandry23/11/25 01:34 PM
100

DiscriminationClemicus/r/MensRights04/03/22 11:13 PM
98

False AccusationClemicus/r/MensRights09/06/24 12:50 AM
91

discussionClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 08:10 PM
86

HealthClemicus/r/MensRights24/04/25 12:51 PM
84

social mediaClemicus/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/26 12:27 AM
80

Social IssuesClemicus/r/MensRights02/05/25 06:47 PM
80

social issuesClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/25 02:49 PM
74

legal rightsClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/25 02:39 PM
73

social mediaClemicus/r/EverydayMisandry03/12/25 07:03 PM
64

IntactivismClemicus/r/MensRights18/06/23 06:49 PM
63

HealthClemicus/r/MensRights22/08/22 06:18 PM
61

social mediaClemicus/r/EverydayMisandry29/07/25 11:53 AM
59

mediaClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/25 11:41 PM
58

social mediaClemicus/r/EverydayMisandry06/09/24 10:11 PM
58

Social IssuesClemicus/r/MensRights04/06/24 08:19 PM
56

articleClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/24 11:36 PM
56

Activism/SupportClemicus/r/MensRights05/01/19 07:15 PM
54

social mediaClemicus/r/EverydayMisandry04/10/25 02:19 PM
52

mental healthClemicus/r/MensRights15/05/25 06:59 PM
47

discussionClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/23 12:54 AM
47

Activism/SupportClemicus/r/MensRights06/11/21 07:17 PM
46

False AccusationClemicus/r/MensRights24/03/24 11:57 AM
41

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights02/05/24 02:29 AM
40

discussionClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/22 10:55 PM
39

discussionClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/24 09:01 PM
39

social mediaClemicus/r/EverydayMisandry21/04/24 08:03 PM
31

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:24 PM
31

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights22/08/21 02:36 AM
31

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights07/07/24 10:50 AM
31

Activism/SupportClemicus/r/MensRights19/04/25 10:34 AM
30

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:19 PM
30

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:11 PM
29

mental healthClemicus/r/MensRights21/05/25 10:00 PM
29

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights23/11/25 05:02 PM
28

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights04/11/24 08:15 PM
27

discussionClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/22 12:31 AM
27

ProgressClemicus/r/MensRights21/11/25 09:06 PM
25

social mediaClemicus/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/25 06:39 PM
25

Activism/SupportClemicus/r/MensRights07/03/22 02:25 AM
25

discussionClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/25 09:54 PM
24

DiscriminationClemicus/r/MensRights18/11/22 09:08 PM
24

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights07/02/24 11:10 PM
23

Edu./Occu.Clemicus/r/MensRights19/07/24 06:52 PM
23

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights30/09/21 01:52 AM
23

Social IssuesClemicus/r/MensRights14/05/25 06:58 PM
21

Activism/SupportClemicus/r/MensRights18/06/25 07:01 PM
20

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights13/04/25 10:43 PM
19

DiscriminationClemicus/r/MensRights05/01/19 05:47 PM
18

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights10/05/24 09:57 PM
18

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:37 PM
17

social mediaClemicus/r/EverydayMisandry21/07/24 05:43 PM
16

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights19/07/24 07:41 PM
16

HealthClemicus/r/MensRights15/05/25 12:26 PM
16

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:14 PM
15

Social IssuesClemicus/r/MensRights05/07/19 08:58 AM
13

Activism/SupportClemicus/r/MensRights05/11/21 09:35 PM
13

HealthClemicus/r/MensRights05/08/23 11:04 PM
13

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights17/04/22 05:29 PM
12

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights13/08/23 05:45 PM
12

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights07/04/22 07:45 PM
12

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights17/09/22 07:48 PM
12

HumourClemicus/r/MensRights09/02/22 05:56 PM
11

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights09/04/22 05:31 PM
11

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights14/07/22 12:09 AM
10

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights03/10/22 11:30 PM
10

discussionClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/23 12:15 AM
9

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights06/06/22 08:40 PM
9

Social IssuesClemicus/r/MensRights19/10/21 06:07 PM
8

Social IssuesClemicus/r/MensRights15/01/24 06:40 PM
8

legal rightsClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/22 06:27 PM
8

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights24/03/22 09:55 PM
7

FeminismClemicus/r/MensRights06/02/22 03:13 PM
6

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights10/09/22 10:58 AM
6

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights01/05/22 02:07 PM
6

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights11/06/23 06:00 PM
6

HumourClemicus/r/MensRights13/07/22 08:00 PM
6

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:01 PM
5

Clemicus/r/MensRights20/06/18 09:28 PM
5

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights18/06/22 11:48 PM
3

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:40 PM
3

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights26/10/21 01:01 AM
2

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:25 PM
2

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights11/09/22 05:35 PM
1

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights04/03/22 08:43 PM
1

Clemicus/r/MensRights05/12/22 01:06 AM
1

mediaClemicus/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/22 11:46 AM
1

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights27/04/22 12:17 AM
0

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights15/10/22 07:08 PM
0

GeneralClemicus/r/MensRights23/04/22 07:47 AM
0

Marriage/ChildrenClemicus/r/MensRights19/04/22 07:55 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,205 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Pretty much. The label femcel is used to separate them from incels. That’s mostly down to how many bad aspects have been tacked onto the word incel. If the label incel was applied to women, potentially it’d be seen as being bad. As it’d be ascribing the worst of humanity to some women. Even though — as you mentioned — there wouldn’t be much difference between the two in terms of beliefs or attitudes. Incel has changed a bit since the media doesn’t focus on it as much. But the label is still some…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/26 11:27 PM
11

Way to miss the trees for the forrest. >In a Brixton bookshop, she picked up a copy of the Scum Manifesto for the first time. Harron says it hit her “like a lightning bolt”. In Solanas’s prose, she found traces of her own creative frustrations and sexist experiences – “all my years catering to the pathetic male ego” – written in their most extreme form, as Solanas called for “civil-minded, responsible females” to “overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automatio…
/r/MensRights20/06/26 11:21 PM
11

That’s a troll.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 09:47 AM
13

On X I’ve had to employ Grok so I can try to wrap my head around some of the posts on there. I’ve seen misandric posts with such outlandish language they border on the absurd. I can’t tell if they’re supposed to be jokes, for engagement purposes (trying to hit the algorithm blindspot), or just outright hate. And then you’ve got the engagement bait accounts you can easily spot, posting the same rubbish. It’s obscene. Edit: PS what’s happening with social media in general? Was there a memo someone…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/05/26 11:34 PM
8

Because it’s due to how crimes are categorised, recorded and, how the complainant are treated during reporting. Rape is pretty much defined as rape by penile penetration across the world. With female perpetrated rape falling under a different offence category. PS look up Professor Philip Rumney. He’s got numerous papers on how the police treated male on male rape. In the UK male on male rape wasn’t treated as such until 1994.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/26 07:23 AM
7

They’re using non-binary in the hope to diversify it. They can’t just mention women so they include non-binary. But in the way they’ll use it is, they’ll allow women and exclude men.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 09:11 PM
7

Jana Alnajjar, a sophomore majoring in philosophy, politics, and law who acts as SAGE’s advocacy liaison, told the publication that she’s “heard from multiple women and non-binary students who want to be involved in different workout spaces but don’t feel comfortable being at the gym.” “Whether it’s being approached regularly or feeling judged, over time that discomfort leads students to stop going to the gym altogether,” she added. I do not believe this individual whatsoever — it’s from the per…
/r/MensRights21/04/26 08:43 PM
1

That’d be extremely funny if that was true. Edit: There’s nothing to back that up. It’s the gooey inconvenient centre of the story.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 08:39 PM
6

Different person. Thank you for spelling it out though.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 11:42 PM
41

It’s been like that for decades. Look into political lesbianism and its ties to feminism — the loudest individuals some of which were authors who sprouted misandric rubbish.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 11:36 PM
1

There’s a odd thing going on with Reddit comments. When I clicked on the notification for this reply, the OP appeared for a split second then the page refreshed. I couldn’t find your comment and thought it got caught up with automod. As for your point, yes. I completely agree. That’s what I meant with chauvinism. It’s someone thinking only men could’ve been part of that group.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 10:57 PM
22

You didn’t even try to sell it properly: Let me say what the number actually is, since apparently we’re doing this. 62 million is total site visits to Motherless in February. It is not 62 million people. It is not 62 million viewers of the “sleep” category. The “sleep” category contains over 20,000 videos; individual videos in it have surpassed 50,000 views. The Telegram group where men coached each other through the logistics of drugging their partners had nearly 1,000 users. Those are the numb…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 04:02 PM
7

What’s with Facebook? I went through a period with Facebook. It kept suggesting increasingly misandric posts. It started off with some organisation for men to fight sexism but they just kept posting these posts by an Instagram ‘author’ — all the quotes were by her, they had her name at the end with a opaque watermark. Then that devolved into short videos with text overlays — usually with someone looking off the screen drinking from a Stanley cup. They’d also be a mixture of posts by the Green Pa…
/r/MensRights09/04/26 02:38 AM
6

But who’s going to enforce it? If male police officers are under curfew through the night then there won’t be anywhere near the amount of police to deal with actual crime or large swathes of those breaking curfew. If thousands kept breaking it, then the enforcement would collapse alongside the economy, power grid, logistics, sewage system, etc. “If it got to that point, it might as well be time to get the mash out and put a fork in England.” PS the whole thing about curfew is virtue signalling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/26 12:26 AM
10

Also if the defendant had removed those pages and he was guilty, why just remove three pages? If the book had been moved off site somewhere then burnt, then the prosecution would have less of a case. The whole thing is a move to prosecute individuals — most likely men — where there’s been a recorded suicide after reports of domestic violence. If you look towards to The Guardian. They’ve published numerous articles on the subject.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 11:23 PM
4

What? Ironing Man is a real thing? Gosh /s
/r/MensRights08/04/26 12:45 AM
7

You know society at large does those things as well, right. And what’s with these types of deflections. The very same people who complain stating household duties are unvalued in society, are usually the same people making the original claim. “The phone call is coming from within the same house.” It’s like the phrase “Boys will be boys.” The very same people complaining it’s a thing are the very same people solidifying it by claiming it’s an actual real thing.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 12:43 AM
18

If anyone doesn’t want to click on it here’s the reasoning: The research focused on all genders and found women were more likely to experience suicidal thoughts, make a suicide attempt and be bereaved by suicide.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 07:44 PM
59

Why’s it so popular to denigrate a whole demographic? These people must realised they’re part of the status quo and aren’t doing anything more than a cross between virtue signalling and punching down. “Oh, it’s so hot and edgy right now to be sexist and hostile towards men.”
/r/EverydayMisandry19/03/26 09:42 PM
12

And they’re using the figures to bolster the domestic violence related suicide statistics. The Guardian’s been oddly excluding men from their reporting with regards to this. Edit: The other day, the Guardian claimed there could be 1,500 cases per year. The article starts off referring to them as women then switches to victims.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 12:47 AM
8

But what does that have to do with what’s being discussed?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 09:48 AM
30

Kinda sick of this. It’s a bit like a game of tennis. Watching two sides, both claim to want to reduce violence against women and girls. With one side, usually pro-immigration, saying the other are only mentioning that because racism. Then you’ve got those who invoke all, all men this and that. Which doesn’t make sense as it isn’t always a man. But they don’t care. Typically these are female chauvinists or they’re gynocentric.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/01/26 08:02 PM
1

My point was: What’s a social media human-centipede?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/01/26 12:55 PM
1

No. There’s too many that are perpetually online that fall foul of these types of videos, boost them, and unironically repeat the claims. Edit: Spellcheck.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/01/26 12:53 PM
2

Yes. Double checked. States, “Licensed professional therapist” on her website along side speaker, podcaster, and author.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/01/26 12:28 PM
13

The second reading keeps getting rescheduled. It was supposed to occur around the start of June last year. The last date it got pushed back to, was oddly enough, today before it was rescheduled yet again. Edit: Looks like this parliamentary session is up to May. They’re just going to keep rescheduling it until it fails.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 03:53 PM
20

The problem with that though is, there’s no pushback for posting you don’t like men or dislike or hate aspects about men. Most likely, you’ll get more pushback for going against the grain and openly stating you don’t hate men and want more people to be open to issues that affect men and boys. Feminists won’t go against this as it doesn’t benefit them or help them achieve whatever their goal is. But if they did, they’d get pushback for either not prioritising feminist issues and not disliking/hat…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 01:24 AM
5

But they are potentially saying it to future victims.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 01:44 AM
3

It’s definitely leaking into media and government policy. So it isn’t much of a jump. Edit: Changed word/Spell check
/r/MensRights01/01/26 01:40 AM
11

Shoo. Edit: If you make it sound like just another manosphere tantrum, it will stop being a meaningful discussion and no one will take it seriously. Too much tone policing and concern trolling. It’s pretty much been like that for at least the past twenty years. The people who’ll ascribe this or whatever post on this subreddit as a manosphere tantrum aren’t going to change their minds. They’ll use any excuse to undermine the legitimacy of men’s rights regardless of it’s based on a post or not. An…
/r/MensRights01/01/26 01:21 AM
1

CCMF: https://menandfamilies.org/ Edit: Formerly known as Cafe.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 12:52 AM
9

In summary even though men make up 38% of the victims they will not get support in fact they are merely being used in misleading statistics that will be used to justify sending school aged boys to anti misogyny training I could’ve sworn I read a conspiracy theory about this a few days ago. That it all comes down to money. The government is paying for third parties to provide speakers to talk to students on a classroom basis and for providing training material.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/25 12:47 AM
8

Check the footnote about men and boys on page 3: https://www.cps.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/publications/cps_vawg_report_2016.pdf Or this: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/strategy-to-end-violence-against-women-and-girls-2016-to-2020/male-victims-position-paper-march-2019-accessible-version
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/25 12:29 AM
5

Thought it aired last year? Is it being reaired? The Detective in charge of the case is a loud and proud misandrist and the series finale basically boils down to a mother covers up murder because husband is controlling and abusive towards her and something something their teenage son kills — the very same person she was going to report the abuse to — in a violent rage. And the Detective murders the controlling and abusive man — by slamming his head in a car door — then laments his death. Plot ho…
/r/MensRights16/12/25 06:06 PM
23

Ahh, Tumblr. Over 65k notes, 26k reblogs, and 39k likes. There’s also a follow up The follow up is all over the place. It basically boils down to women want men like Darcy but men want women in golden bikinis and something something die so they can avenge them and something something find another male fantasy and discard. Edit: Those tags are something else.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/12/25 06:28 PM
2

Jesus OP, you’re just regurgitating feminist talking points and completely missing the problem. The people mentioned in the article are boogeymen. The people who are causing the problems are the very same ones who are suggesting solutions. They’re the real ones causing the problems. Nothing can and will be fixed until this is recognised. Then the next step would be not placing the blame entirely on men and boys. I mean, look at White Ribbon and primary intervention in schools. That won’t fix any…
/r/MensRights13/12/25 01:22 AM
1

They’re false/made up.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/25 05:58 PM
2

Isn’t AI and I pointed out the reasons behind the post — couldn’t post a screenshot so had to include a link.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 09:46 PM
2

It’s stands for violence against women and girls. It’s inclusive too, as it includes violence against men and boys, for some reason.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/11/25 11:57 AM
1

It’s a populistic take.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 10:07 PM
4

In reference to the third screenshot — the first screenshot on that: That’s why in the UK the government pledged £1 billion for their VAWG strategy and some £6.4 million for men’s health, over three years. Which ironically includes VAWG. PS I believe it was £3 million and £3.4 million. Might be wrong though 🤷‍♂️
/r/EverydayMisandry21/11/25 10:02 PM
9

Who knows. You get people like that here all the time.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 08:33 PM
28

Someone’s on the self-promotion bandwagon again. Her actions during that vigil caused the arrest. Have someone on standby with a camera Antagonise a police officer Capture a sweet photo Profit
/r/MensRights20/11/25 08:31 PM
4

It’s much worse: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/691c8a7b5a253e2c40d706ee/mens-health-a-strategic-vision-for-england.pdf
/r/MensRights19/11/25 10:29 PM
1

Just not men.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/25 11:01 PM
18

What’s going on? Got recommended a similar oped, on Facebook, but from the Guardian. Which mentions a Vogue article in the same vein.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/11/25 11:42 PM
20

Eh, while I’d agree that more feminists engage in casual misandry more often than men do misogyny, I think the sexism expressed by misogynists is more intense and dehumanizing I wholeheartedly disagree on both points. this is observed in many other areas too, like IQ Odd non-sequitur. What’s your argument here? Lower average IQs are associated with higher levels of dehumanisation? Also is that limited to hetero or, is it hetero and homo — in the sense of, directed towards different sex, or diffe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/25 12:24 PM
4

From Wikipedia: Gammon is a pejorative term popularised in British political culture since the 2010s. The term refers to the colour of a white person's flushed face, which purportedly resembles the type of pork of the same name.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 11:51 PM
1

Not possible. What do you mean by male bashing? That could mean those currently on the fringe or feminism in general — male violence, rape culture, patriarchy conjecture, etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/25 11:42 PM
9

I need air after reading the other responses.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/10/25 06:02 PM
1

Yes, they were individuals and chose to do something but that statement completely ignores the environment in which they existed in, the propaganda they were exposed to and the overarching beliefs during that time. That could apply to anyone — the soldiers who went to war or those who handed out white feathers. What type of propaganda would cause someone to pin a badge — with ties to four feathers — to men’s lapels? It did damage their relationship but that isn't relevant to my point, It’s more …
/r/MensRights11/10/25 05:32 PM
1

When in doubt blame AI I suppose. The assumption was based on syntax and vernacular. the point is that it was a propaganda tool used to shame men into enlisting in the military That’s true. and knowledge we know about war time propaganda now cannot be applied to individuals of that time who deeply believed in what they were told. I’m assuming it follows on from enlistment. That could pretty much be applied to almost anything. They went out of their way to shame men they deemed weren’t a soldier …
/r/MensRights11/10/25 05:04 PM
1

Reads too much like AI — the flow and specific wording. It downplays the White Feather movement and fails to mention it was in response to fewer men joining the armed forces. Which was started by Admiral Fitzgerald. It also doesn’t mention the draft in 1916. Which expanded a few times — expanded the age range and went on to include married men. Also enlisted men were shamed. It was any man they deemed to be not fighting for the country and that included men recovering from injuries sustained on …
/r/MensRights11/10/25 04:32 PM
15

Slam poetry?
/r/EverydayMisandry10/10/25 11:39 PM
6

The claim was supposedly, men placing cameras in the booths, then going back later, getting caught then stating they’d lost their camera. If it’s the same post I saw, someone posted a source and that was the claim. Regardless, it doesn’t make much sense. Edit: Seems that’s a place called Kyoto Olympia and the booths are called purikuras. Couldn’t find much about it. I did find three links — one was Flickr and the other two seemed to share the same source for the claims. The source for the claims…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/09/25 12:22 AM
0

No worries.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:02 PM
3

The draft rules were made by men, and further upheld by men K. Edit: The argument could easily be switched to, “Well, who voted for these individuals.” Regardless of sex, politicians make up a tiny percentage of the population and women are the majority voter. The argument is, should the vote be tied to service and having an investment in either the country or community. Putting the needs of others above your own. Instead of allowing for self-serving politics to take over. Nah. It’s the men’s fa…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 01:39 PM
0

🤨
/r/MensRights29/08/25 01:35 PM
4

It’s associated with a movement that started in South Korea.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 03:27 AM
1

Maybe check usernames? “Nice dictionary definition fallacy” was my first reply to you.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 01:20 PM
1

What’s with the spaghetti? That’s the same argument you presented in the previous reply.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 10:30 AM
3

Don’t forget Joe Biden. For his role back then and in the 90s.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 11:49 PM
2

Nice dictionary definition fallacy.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 11:48 PM
10

so the Title IX investigation found the boys responsible for sexual harassment and sex-based discrimination of the student, hence why they were suspended The Witchhunter General will be very pleased. Edit: OP did a sneaky edit
/r/MensRights22/08/25 04:55 PM
3

Only if Samual L. Jackson gets to play Cinderella
/r/MensRights19/08/25 05:02 PM
2

The newspaper who published the article.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 05:01 PM
1

The article is bait and an advertisement — for “The Thursday Murder Cub.” The author has taken a divisive stance in the hope of driving traffic to it. Also: Moneypenny exists. Isn’t James Bond, but has had potential.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 04:57 PM
10

Grippysock
/r/EverydayMisandry11/08/25 09:47 AM
49

It was posted to a misandric subreddit. So don’t put too much thought into it. It’s most likely a minority of men do the base minimum and the rest are bad to prison worthy.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/08/25 06:40 PM
7

Sorry, I’m still not getting you. I'm in teaching and I've had my fair share of flak from these types of men with their performative macho masculinity. You wrote that in your previous response then this: It doesn't rlly happen with adults other than the occasional terminally online freak but I don't really count them So it’s men. But it really doesn’t happen with adults — other than the terminally online ones which you don’t count. But you counted them? You can get a similar opinion from women o…
/r/MensRights01/08/25 01:17 PM
12

Also, I am sure they are just paying that money to their ''male feminist allies'' for them to repeat the same bs they were saying to poor children They’ve got to filter out any man who doesn’t follow it completely as they can’t have any who believe masculinity isn’t toxic and teaching that to boys. As that’d underline their goals. Indoctrinate the children. Teach boys all these lies from an early age and they won’t question them. As that will be the undeniable truth to them.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 11:03 AM
11

There’s too much leeway there. What’s the context behind those responses? The implication seems to be fellow colleagues. But I can’t ascertain that.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 10:53 AM
12

That’s supposed to mean divides opinion. It was used in marketing Marmite — love or hate it. In the case of the OP, it’s probably more tepid or hate it. Not sure how to explain without being rude. OP is autistic and has dyslexia. So uses AI to write up his posts. So gets pushback. When his posts get deleted, he’ll double down and post a rant complaining about the previous post getting deleted. Then wash and repeat. Edit: One was deleted by the mods and the other is awaiting mod approval.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/25 10:11 AM
19

They’re pro-feminism though. Edit: It was r/mensrights Edit2: It looks like it was caught by Automod. The OP has a bit of a marmite relationship with the mods and posters over there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/25 08:08 AM
6

Women experience the same too, there's probably women out there that don't engage in this then suddenly they saw a post like this where a guy with a thousand followers. They’re just sat there drinking tea, all civil. Then pow, this 1.3k follower account just pops up on their feed and just the mere presence is enough to send them over the edge into a sea of madness. Wake me when it reaches 100k. The guy who just casually comment remove women like that will definitely be scary. I'm not a woman but…
/r/MensRights30/07/25 11:23 AM
2

Lmao another one of your “Get out of responding with something of substance” replies.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 04:36 AM
2

Maybe ask them what their opinions of people who say they’re not feminist. Some will ask a number of follow up questions which usually leads to “Well, so you are a feminist.” Being non-feminist can be seen as anything from “A feminist who doesn’t call themselves a feminist” to being anti-progressive or anti-women, at its worse. It comes down it’s much easier, to say you’re a feminist than whatever the absence of it is. You’d be in the cool club then. Going back to he original topic: It’s way mor…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 04:34 AM
4

Flawed argument. You’re assuming anyone who responds negatively to posts on those subreddits are men. I mentioned men explicitly and I was quoting you — you mentioned anti-feminist men. In hindsight, considering the type of person you are, I should’ve made it clear enough for you so you’d have no wiggle room. Now getting to the actual point: Bringing up men in relation to whatever argument you were making there, that’s short code for female chauvinism. Men wrong. Then that means if comment wrong…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 04:19 AM
3

Dude, for reals? So basically, you could’ve written something about dinosaurs or the supernatural and used a similar explanation. The simplest explanation is, it’s a tribalistic movement. Whether or not the individuals believe in its principles or goals is another thing.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 03:57 AM
8

How do you tell the men apart from the women? Do they start off their replies with “As a man”? Also why are you differentiating between feminist and anti-feminist? Someone can be a feminist and they can also disagree with posts — or even specific aspects of feminism.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 12:45 AM
4

There’s just one little problem there, you’re confused feminism with the Women’s Rights Movement. Also, to pad your list, you’ve added some half-truths and outright lies. The vote was tied to either property ownership or in exchange for something. Such as bucket service or being drafted. If the discussion was about the US then the 15th amendment would probably be applicable. They could have their own bank accounts even back then — also they’re a pretty recent development for the everyday person.…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 12:36 AM
6

Unless they are EXTREMELY heavily moderated, damn near every post gets dogpiled by anti-feminist men and an endless parade of whataboutisms. It's pretty bad. Forgot you wrote this?
/r/MensRights26/07/25 12:12 AM
7

Flawed argument. You’re assuming anyone who responds negatively to posts on those subreddits are men. Women can and do respond negatively to those posts on those subreddits.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 11:56 PM
24

<image> That’s pretty ironic. It’s almost as if abusers use that tactic and it isn’t gender specific.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/07/25 07:17 PM
2

Paper: "Despite statistical evidence that men are more likely to be sexually assaulted than wrongfully accused of assault, false rape allegations are the most frequently discussed topic on MRA forums and websites" That’s insanely disingenuous. They’ve limited the scope to top posts, within specific dates, with the search words “false accusations”, “false allegations” and, “fake rape.” Me: Not all men who are sexually assaulted will report their assaults, either to police or in surveys, either. B…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 12:13 AM
3

By the person who made the claim — who’s the same one who wrote the article.
/r/MensRights07/07/25 11:51 PM
8

Despite statistical evidence that men are more likely to be sexually assaulted than wrongfully accused of assault, false rape allegations are the most frequently discussed topic on MRA forums and websites." I believe this is the “Men commit 99% of rapes” myth. The claim is 99% of all rapes are committed by men because they’ve defined it as only a crime that can be committed by penetration with a penis. It’s made up of 90% female victims, 9% male victims and, 0.9% to 1% is made up of female perpe…
/r/MensRights07/07/25 11:40 PM
6

That’s was a painful read, thanks OP. It isn’t an argument and isn’t supposed to be logical. It’s someone communicating their level of misandry and trying to justify it. “Let’s see what happens when my fictional scenario is dialled up to eleven.”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/25 11:31 AM
1

As soon as someone drops that line, you know you're dealing with someone regurgitating a script they cribbed from Saint Atwood. It’s an orphan in a prattle that’s supposed to be a critic about writing male characters. Most than likely they’ve never read the book in question and they’re just mindlessly repeating it.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/07/25 06:47 PM
5

Going from your posting history it looks like either you’re concern trolling or you’re listening to people who, at minimum, dislike or despise you for your sex. If it’s the latter, stop judging yourself by their opinions. You’re an individual. Not part of an oppressive collective due to your sex. If it’s the former. Nothing much can really be stated and you’ve previously asked a similar question on here. As for the religious allegations of sexism. You got a few answers on a different subreddit a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 08:41 PM
5

No. You made a outright lie from the outset and didn’t provide any examples, then dodged it.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 02:13 AM
1

You can’t. Either you’d have to upload them to a image host or post them to your profile — you can make posts that are listed under your profile.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 12:00 AM
5

That's pretty much Parliament. Can anyone please explain to me what is happening in this clip? What is the woman’s job here (seems to be putting down some paper?) and the man seemingly started talking all of a sudden? And what’s up with all the background chatter? Had to do some digging. That's Seema Malhotra. She's the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Equalities ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seema_Malhotra and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minister_for_Women_and_Equalities#Minister_…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 12:30 PM
5

That’s happened to about 145 people now. Also the person in the screenshot is a misandrist, posting in a misandric subreddit. So not really noteworthy.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 06:09 PM
4

Unfortunately it looks like it’s been rescheduled again. It’s the third time so far. The new date won’t be known until Tuesday next week, at the earliest.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/25 11:20 PM
1

Just checked Ben Obese-Jectys’ Twitter account and found this: https://x.com/benobesejecty/status/1935342277729173661 Must’ve overlooked it. Search is pretty useless on there. The response in the video is classic: It’s an issue that effects women and girls more (sic)
/r/MensRights18/06/25 11:17 PM
55

woah stomp your feet a bit more it’ll help you feel better, i answered your question You didn’t answer it. You dodged it yet again. PS hold up… You moved the goal posts: From: but these are what female victims hear all the time except in those cases the people aren’t joking and are serious when they say it and truly believe that those are factors that are the fault of the victim To: that’s my whole point these comment ARE made under posts about female victims except the people make the comments …
/r/MensRights08/06/25 11:42 AM
49

yes, you have to be stupid to think that these people genuinely mean what they are saying and are not using satire If there’s no difference between the two. How or what are you using so you can differentiate between serious comments and satire?
/r/MensRights08/06/25 10:42 AM
0

No offence OP, this is a bit of a rabbit hole. The narrative is, domestic violence isn’t individualistic. It’s part of methodical and widespread abuse against women and girls. Something something hive mind something something patriarchy. Men acting in accordance to the patriarchy — or men are the patriarchy — to basically dominate and subjugate women and girls through abuse in various forms.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 01:00 AM
1

What’s that in relation to? I don’t know if you’re quoting someone, or if that’s from an article.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 10:54 AM
2

Since you you brought it up in relation to Adolescence in the full set. Pretty much all of the news coverage about either incels or the Red Pill, in relation to the series, were lies. The series antagonist was bullied and part of that bullying was him being called an incel. It was external forces not him looking up stuff online. Watch the committee from the end of April.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 12:07 AM
11

Depends on reasons. Could be using it as an excuse or they’re blind to their misandry. It’s gotten to the extent it seems normal to them to express that amount of hatred towards a whole demographic. Either way OP what you outlined, that’s a type of defence. It can never be addressed because it’ll either be compared to another subreddit or chalked up to venting — “It’s just venting against the patriarchy and hatred against women.” PS that’s probably a photo of Aokigahara Forest in Japan.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/25 07:32 PM
2

I meant by the OOP. Looks like it’s gotten the highest metrics in comparison to her other Medium articles.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/25 04:02 PM
3

Is this article engagement bait? It’s a divisive opinion that tries to expand it to all — talks on behalf of ‘all women’, about ‘all men’. Can’t even make it past a few paragraphs without contradictions — “All men are the same. Except for this. And except for that. Blah. Blah. Blah.” It’s got the highest metrics in comparison — on Medium — but it’s complete and utter slop. Either way, it’s on brand for YourTango. Edit: Added article.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/25 03:52 PM
3

That’s pretty bad faith. What’s the worst consequence of slander?
/r/MensRights30/05/25 11:58 AM
3

It won’t permit. If your overall point is androgyny, start off with that. No, one based, unfortunately, on reality. What’s the splash back here? That could easily be applied to men in the form of weaker immunity systems.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 09:55 AM
2

I am proposing removing the concept of "masculinity"(femininity is a non-existent concept anyway, which only exists so "masculinity" can serve it) They’re tied to intrinsic traits though. This replacement would be purely semantics, wouldn’t fix any issues, and could lead to an identity crisis. Also no, it's not muh soggy knee, it's an observation. One based on sexism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 09:46 AM
2

So a type of egalitarianism thinly applied as sex non-specific behaviours and traits. There’s overlaps between the sexes so what exactly are you proposing? PS you’ll have to excuse me, I’m pretty sure your reply here is misogynistic: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/PHBXV2GmgA
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 09:19 AM
1

So what’s your proposal? What’s this masculinity replacement? If that was your overall point you’d have made that argument instead of basically “Masculinity bad.” The difference between you and them is how it’s being approached.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 08:50 AM
6

OP is a troll. Also that’s a new account.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 07:04 AM
9

The OP asked why so many online discussions devolved into mocking Male loneliness. My original comment is on the nature of those discussions, not the topic itself. Then that’d come down to the difference between the two types of discussion — the legitimate ones and the reactionary ones. Bundling them together doesn’t help anyone. At most you’ve argued, whatever these talking points are, they are now red flags and indicative of the discussion. The problem though is, the issues will be downplayed …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 02:13 PM
14

That's because incels have invaded so many online spaces with their dumb manosphere talking points Where does this fit with the OP? Also did you get lost? You know this is a men’s space, right? and in addition you can't help but feel there is some significant schadenfreude being felt by women who see the suffering of men at a meta level as some sort of payback for centuries of oppression of men. Awesome 👍 meta level as some sort of payback for centuries of oppression of men Freudian slip? That’d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 01:17 PM
4

If men are being ‘congratulated’ and not taken seriously if they’re raped, then it’s patriarchy’s fault. It’s the fault of an amalgamous force? No feminist is out here congratulating a man after he got raped. It’s usually other men who tell his he’s ’scored’ some. You skipped over something: The issue those rape proportions is in most places the rape of men isn't even considered as such. They also face the prospect of being congratulated for their victimization. It's really not a good place to b…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 11:39 PM
4

Oh and you still didn't tell me what rights men have lost Holy poop. You switched accounts -- from a sockpuppet to a main account? Going from a later reply: Are you gonna start whacking people with a rolled up newspaper?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/25 08:47 PM
3

Concern trolling? It fits all the criteria. Setting impossible goals to appease an unknown audience purely on a subjective basis. That these steps must be completed to appease some force that's holding the movement back. If somehow that would change, then men's rights would surely progress. If this movement wants to actually matter, it has to focus on the problems men are dealing with right now That's legitimately funny or sad depending how you view it. That list hasn't changed much in the past …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/25 08:33 PM
1

It isn’t a therapy session. It’s a group of men who meet up and talk. They don’t record anything so it would be reliant on the memories of the attending individuals. They’re there because they’re also experiencing issues, so how much or how accurately are they going to remember something, someone else said at a meeting? Also the mental state argument would rely on an external factor. As in X went on to do something. That’d cross into hearsay, as they’d most likely be asking someone with no exper…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:05 PM
1

I’m not sure what you mean. What purpose would a subpoena serve? This is basically a group of men who meet up and talk about issues they’re facing. Whatever said there would most likely be classed as hearsay and be inadmissible by the courts. Probably the only thing would be mental state and that’d be cutting it close. You did this with one of my posts about Andy’s Man Club. You claimed that’s a honeypot for married men. Can you back that up with anything? That’s also a group run by volunteers a…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 05:31 PM
1

Not sure what you’re asking. The screenshots comprised of responses to that tweet. With it being Twitter there’s no way of knowing if they were ragebait or actual individuals. The OOOP is still up. Think the OOP deactivated their account. Think the original set was posted to r/everydaymisandry
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 06:57 AM
8

Edit: and charges for the false accuser? No. Theres nothing out there to suggest she was charged with submitting a false police report or for wasting police time. The police report was vague enough for it to be put down to mistaken identity. There’s unrelated charges against her relating to theft and forgery. Both relate to submitting forged documents to Airbnb regarding additional charges (theft plus cleaning and moving fees). One was a forged police report. The other was a forged receipt.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 11:06 AM
4

About this instead: What’s your overall point in relation to the OP, other than whataboutisms?
/r/MensRights14/05/25 11:56 PM
1

Additionally, male androgyny—especially in goth and alternative spaces—is still highly misunderstood. What Copilot laid out here is a layer or two above the actual issue. It isn’t misunderstood. That’s working as intended. Those spaces should be referred to as male exclusionary. Who else sees this issue? How do we build spaces that actually support men rather than forcing us to fit into the same restrictive expectations? The restrictive expectation argument is a Trojan horse. The problem is the …
/r/MensRights14/05/25 02:01 AM
5

Only noticed the over 40s one. Occasionally those who troll on here also post on there. I also know about several others. One or two of those are pretty much the Arkham subreddit but for complaining about men. Honestly, I don’t know what’s going on with them. Could be anything from echo chambers, trolls, secret operations — pretty much what you stated. Doesn’t make sense on a performative level. They’d have to be a large enough audience who’d take whatever they’re posting at face value. I suppos…
/r/MensRights12/05/25 11:10 PM
9

Third paragraph: Is that deflection? Accuse others of things you’re doing yourself. What’s outlined there, rarely happens and when it does the individual usually gets ousted.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/05/25 10:36 PM
12

If someone used it as evidence, just dismiss it. It’s badly written and there’s nothing to back the claims. PS you need to edit the link. There’s a space in the URL.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 04:36 PM
1

The payoff is in the comments.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 12:20 PM
1

As boring as this is. This reads as a rewrite of In A Violent Nature.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 12:19 PM
3

If you meant the first panel, nothing. They were only there because they wrote a popular drama series. Didn’t watch too much of the second panel. After the recent election Labour should be calling a general election before they cause more damage. Probably won’t be until 2029/2030.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 07:59 PM
29

Money. They needed a topic to monetise. The word incel has been increasing in usage and it’s a mostly negative word. With bad connotations. It’s gone from meaning someone who has problems getting in to relationships. To misogynist with no social skills, and questionable bathing habits.
/r/MensRights04/05/25 07:58 PM
21

Why is everyone clinging to this one so much? No idea. Fits in with their worldview, biases, and prejudices? Edit: It’s their version of porn.
/r/MensRights04/05/25 07:29 PM
15

It’s taking an inordinate amount of time to watch this. Only got to the second panel. They’re lowballing him and there’s little to no merit to any of it. It’s all based on supposition. The writers and panel don’t know what their talking about. The elements mentioned during the panel weren’t in the show whatsoever. Also Thorne straight up lies. He stated he had to change his algorithms for research purposes. Then mentioned about it only taking twenty-six minutes to find such material — which he d…
/r/MensRights04/05/25 05:37 PM
6

Its about censorship and power. All in order to support the Online Safety Act? It’s government and media backed. It was overtly advertised then pushed into schools. Totally fake 'evidence' and the contrived setup of the whole thing. Yeah. It’s a drama with specific talking points tacked on. PS there might be be a related committee. It’s mentioned around 49:30, the point starts from 49:00. That’s insane.
/r/MensRights04/05/25 02:36 PM
7

They also expanded the amount of groups in Doncaster according to this: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4glglvvewwo
/r/MensRights02/05/25 06:52 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/vP9DrO5OFV
/r/MensRights29/04/25 08:31 PM
1

I can't speak to how widespread or rare this is, but if it happens even once that a 10 year old boy misbehaves to this degree and cites Andrew Tate as his inspiration It’s an assertion than anything else. If it’s behaviour or speech, it could be simply bad logic. Boys are influenced by Tate so any sexism from them must therefore be influenced by Tate. it's frankly natural that people's heads will hit the roof, and it might even make the news. The Department of Education have released press relea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/25 05:45 PM
4

Yeah lol
/r/EverydayMisandry29/04/25 05:22 PM
12

The point isn’t they’d prefer to be in the company of a bear. It’s to shit on men and to communicate that to others. Imagine if that manifested into just “Men stink”, “Men are just straight down nasty”, or some other anti-male motto. It doesn’t have to be true, they’re communicating their dislike or hatred of men to others. A type of populistic virtue signal. It’s whatever the opposite of pickme is.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/04/25 11:51 AM
4

All you do in this instance is compare the content to the comments. When I went through that post, none of them referenced any part of it. The very nature of that subreddit means they can’t question any part of it. Unless there’s another study that states that particular point happens at a much higher occurrence. The exception probably being males as victims of females (the 1 in 7 figure). Regardless, it’s just a big pile of poop. Easiest way to undermine would be asking what it’s in relation to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/25 09:37 AM
1

They’re already doing that in UK schools. It’s called PSHE/RSHE. Edit: Think it’s called respectful relationships. The anti-manosphere training should be filtering through soon. That’d come down to training providers — such as PSHE Association.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 06:03 PM
5

This should probably be stickied. It’s the mic drop of all mic drops.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 02:07 PM
13

Cute. That’s a no true Scotsman’s fallacy and you’re gatekeeping the term.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 01:56 PM
5

Prejudice is a blanket term for sexism and racism, etc. All you’ve conveyed is: This sexism isn’t sexism. Sexism is a form of prejudice. That’s what it means. And it doesn’t matter if it was caused by other men. You don’t include any possible reasons as to why. Just it was caused by other men — in an odd list. And concluded that with a checkmate and a dictionary definition fallacy.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 01:52 PM
22

* Social/Non-profit/Education/Government Organizations care about Men's Issues more than this subreddit suggests, and they can be our allies. You haven’t even made a case for this. You did make one against #metoo and the implication, how any parent could make an allegation against you. And put that alongside this subreddit is effectively an echo chamber and, we or whoever, should be more open to working with individuals and organisations, who’d be most likely diametrically opposed to viewing men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/25 01:24 PM
4

What even is this? I’ve noticed a growing conversation around masculinity, not just here in the UK but popping up recently in Australia too, I saw a piece linked to Movember the other day Link? and honestly, I think it’s brilliant. It’s about time we opened up more about what masculinity really is, beyond the old clichés of big muscles and bench pressing your way through life. How about this instead: Allow men to be men. You’re limiting it to such an extent expansion would mean becoming feminine…
/r/MensRights27/04/25 10:31 AM
4

Bad writing. Murder trials require evidence the suspect committed the murder and it doesn’t matter if they confessed to it. They’d still have to tie them to the actual crime. The being sealed might limit someone looking for a conspiracy but all that’d do is put suspicion on one person who was pretty open about it. Edit: In the end it was a slap. It was even if women had confessed to those murders. A man did it. Even under having their locations monitored 24/7. Edit2: Oh yeah and none of the offi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/25 12:20 AM
2

Although the premis itself broke my suspension of disbelief... and then I heard that a UK politician had suggested a male curfew in parliament and, idk the real world lately has been breaking my suspension of disbelief which shouldn't be possible.... That was Baroness Jennifer Helen Jones. It was a type of Kafka trap or Schrödinger’s cat. Anyone who engaged with it negatively was accused of putting men’s feelings above women’s safety. Think the claim was it either a thought experiment or a joke.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/25 11:39 PM
4

It aired last Oct and didn’t get a lot of attention. Neither did the book.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/25 04:21 PM
20

Pretty much, yes. Edit: I completely forgot they exist
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/25 08:05 PM
2

Yes. They wouldn't address any of the issues. Read the summary I added at the end. It's asserting this is the solution for the problem. The biggest issue is, he could stand to benefit from handing out bad advice. Dr. Thomas offers both training and consultation services covering this particular subject.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 11:49 PM
1

You could argue it’s financial incentives vs. objectivity. If there’s an financial incentive or that revenue is relied upon can someone, who provides those services, be objective and neutral on the subject? There has to be a market for it and whatever training or consultancy he’s offering, had to be the type that’s being sought after. If it doesn’t fit the clients criteria, all they have to do is find another provider. Someone who’s more willing to provide the type of training the client wants. …
/r/MensRights23/04/25 03:13 PM
1

That’s possible. It’ll come down to how it could be sold to the public. The media coverage would probably be savage. That’s happening to an extent in schools with third parties — I know Survivors UK offer it, in the form of courses around respectable relationships — and there’s NGOs like Tender that put on plays. I didn’t really look into it much. Just thought it was odd advice and was just published as it fits into the type of articles they’ve been pushing. The article isn’t even consistent. Th…
/r/MensRights23/04/25 03:00 PM
7

His overall goal is to make money. Did some digging. He has a financial interest in this in the form of training and consulting.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 11:25 AM
2

No idea. There’s nothing to go on. Without some key information it’ll be pretty much impossible to find anything. I did some digging. It’s just a slurry of dating websites and articles about dating coaches. PS found Thomas’ X account. There’s a link to his website on there. Seems he offers bespoke training and CPD sessions for professionals. In light of that information, that makes this article a possible advert. Odd thing though is, it’s been covered by at least four outlets.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 11:20 AM
13

It’s a nothing burger. Nothing much will come out of it. Some university Dr is just airing their opinion and the press is more than willing to publish that.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 11:04 PM
19

Because they can’t approach it from any other position. Anything encroaching on the Red Pill, will be seen as bad and counterproductive to women’s rights and feminism. Heck, they’d probably still argue it’s bad because it isn’t progressive enough or, something about male privilege.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 11:00 PM
26

They are. It’d be the type they approve of.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 10:21 PM
18

It’s pretty much a copy of a Times article. But yeah: https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/features/incel-books-literary-trend-online-b2696032.html Edit: I’m surprised Strangers on a Train isn’t mentioned.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 10:14 PM
22

Looks like there will be a gravy train coming to 'help young men date' and also misogyny conversion camps. Doubt it on both counts. The government wouldn’t touch it — the press would go nuts. Also they’d have to make a new distinction between these new ‘dating coaches’ and say PUAs. Couldn't make this up, how come the femcell is never brought up? Because they’re still riding the Tate Adolescence incel bump and there’d have to be something out out there for them to write an article about. Probabl…
/r/MensRights22/04/25 09:59 PM
1

Yeah, it’s odd. Why would Timmy even watch any of those in the first place. I get the edginess aspect. But that was pretty much over at least three years ago. Take Elon. He’s pretty much cringe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 12:40 AM
3

That just reminds me how insufferable some people are. There wasn’t much point that to that entry — “Something, something, not misandric, I’m married to a man” — and the next entry isn’t much better — that one was about the pendulum swinging too far and something about the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 09:34 PM
15

That top comment is just something else.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 08:12 PM
1

That’s Sky News for you. Also single quotes are supposed to be used when quoting someone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 07:53 PM
1

Watched the full video. He has a few good points but it’s wrapped in propaganda and he leans too heavily on the series. I mean: He skips the bullying which is talked about and towards the end of the video starts talking about body language. It’s fictional. It is a fictional drama. And pointing out that it will hurt women is not trying to frame it like hurting women is the primary reason why serious attention to men's issues is important. It is framed as the inevitable consequence of ignoring the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 07:39 PM
5

Posts regular videos to Rumble. Still gets some pretty good metrics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 01:32 PM
8

At least the press only mention him a few times a week — and have done for the past several freaking years
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 01:04 PM
2

Yeah, like “Here’s a video of my husband doing the X challenge — weaponised incompetence.” It’s almost like filming that, is more importance than relationship cohesion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 11:46 AM
17

Because, generally speaking, men’s hobbies and pursuits are perceived as being on the right and the left shuns those?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 11:31 AM
6

I am sceptical, Tate is the middle class bogey man of Guardian readers and the teaching profession is stuffed full of Guardian readers. Especially among those most active in unions. That’d have to be more performative than anything else. For them, the bigger threat is men and, by extension, boys. Instead of having to deal with Islamic extremism, they initially went after the far right and then they noticed incels. Ideal, they could target that group and being completely safe from any nasty poten…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 10:27 AM
17

You outlined it in your post. Other than portraying men as perpetrators and women as victims of males? That’s at the core in both instances. when trans people are the ones being targeted here? Biological women would be still caught up in it. Though to be honest, it’s almost completely unenforceable. It’d be limited and would probably just cover changing rooms. Look at some of the cases the press focused on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 11:00 PM
3

But the inverse is also kind of true, before a mass shooting happens often someone has been pushed to imploding, so anything that pushes large numbers of people to break does marginally increase the risk mass shootings. Yes, absolutely, I agree. Not sure if I can add anything that hasn’t already been addressed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 11:29 AM
1

Had to dig around for this: Dad La Soul was featured on BBC 1's Morning Live when Matt Edmondson came to visit us. He was finding out about the work carried out by projects supported by Comic Relief. He also had a connection, with he and his dad both suffering with their mental health. https://youtu.be/UjDoZgrW5W8
/r/MensRights19/04/25 11:16 AM
11

He was an incel. He blamed his mum for his being a virgin. That’s dangerous. No, I’m pretty sure the dangerous part is ‘He planned on murdering women.’ Maybe I’m overlooking something. I did try to find something. Closest thing was early releases and someone being attacked by a convicted murderer who was on early release. Not sure if semantics. I’m pretty sure that’s actually a crime. Think it falls under conspiracy to murder. Even though no actual murder was committed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 11:05 AM
19

Thats literally the reason why mass shooters exist No offence. It’s kinda ironic given what the previous poster responded with. Those are the most extreme examples and a tiny percentage — I’m not excusing or trying to downplay. The majority who implode hurt themselves. They’re more of a danger to themselves than anyone else. I agree with everything else you wrote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 10:56 AM
3

Maybe explain why though? A write up might’ve helped. Haven’t watched more than a minute in. It just seems he’s going by the popular narrative around the series.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 04:27 PM
3

And I also started noticing the women often times seem to have the typical clout chaser type of TikTok accounts where they hop on any man hating trend that starts. You mean like 4B and, things like the orange peel and tomato sauce challenges? Not sure what else I can post. Clout chasing isn’t really a strong enough word. Definitionally it fits. Though, tribalistic main character would probably suit it better imho. It seems as if they’re always trying to find a new level. It’s almost always targe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 04:16 PM
3

Legally speaking, it effects both. Though, the focus will always be on trans women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 03:46 PM
1

Doubt it, sorry. This post has been deleted so won’t get as much traction. I’ll try to get the few pdfs that are in that post and back them up somewhere.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 03:09 PM
2

Probably deleted his account. If you go through that post there’s a response by a mod. The response to the mod is also deleted.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 02:37 PM
13

u/strange-buy2081 It was deleted by the OP. Edit: https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ha96nr/men_are_vulnerable/
/r/MensRights17/04/25 02:17 PM
3

You’re putting a load of faith in those who aren’t truthful or want to be truthful and hoping for once they will be truthful. And they won’t flip the script on you and use that as an example of misogyny to bring in new laws. You might as well just be pouring petrol over everything. That could cause permanent damage. The government, or whoever, are not going to have an epiphany and see the changes they’re making are contributing to the problems. And you’re giving them potential people they can po…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/25 01:51 AM
3

That’s possibly the most insane thing I’ve ever read.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/25 12:52 AM
1

I agree, it’s Onion-esque
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/25 09:40 AM
2

The NCA has a press release but it’s about illegal activities. Think sexplotation scams, malware, illegal guns, etc.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/25 09:52 PM
3

He explicitely calls it "not a documentary". Yet the god damn prime minister of the UK refers to it as such and writes policy based on it. If you mean RHSE. That was probably on the way in regardless. Either way, it'd be short sighted of him to do that. Can't see it being more than a virtue signal. Hope he isn't a populist cause that'd be bad. 8:12 So boys are saying and doing harmful things to girls because they've been poluted. Not even by Andrew Tate because to my surprise, he does admit that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 01:05 PM
3

But that’s usually used to either promote or deflect criticisms. And he’s being awfully obscure in his language. That could either taken as attacks from specific forums or, high profile or well known individuals. As there’s no single online community. PS just did some searching on X. Didn’t really see anything bad. Worst was about him and a hen house. Found a BBC Newsnight clip that repeated the claims. Edit: He fully deserves it for this absurd belief that his melodrama for true crime wine aunt…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 12:26 PM
1

Yes, once, in the second episode. That Andrew Tate shite (sic)
/r/EverydayMisandry12/04/25 10:29 PM
6

Today I learnt something new, thanks 🙂
/r/MensRights12/04/25 03:35 PM
11

Almost lost me, sorry. Is com kid someone who spends a lot of time online?
/r/MensRights12/04/25 03:13 PM
11

Thought I’d better post an update. I can’t update the OP. A few minutes after posting this I found: The Director General of the National Crime Agency has warned of a “deeply concerning” trend of online networks of predominantly teenage boys, dedicated to inflicting harm and committing a range of criminality. Graeme Biggar is calling on everyone - from law enforcement, to parents and carers, education professionals, and industry - to play their part in reducing the risk from “sadistic and violent…
/r/MensRights12/04/25 03:09 PM
24

No offence, that’s individually, this claims males are accessing material on, what are being referred to as, com networks. Then targeting certain people via certain websites.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 03:01 PM
43

Which country? In the UK that’d be classified as a offensive weapon. PS accidentally pressed enter. Hadn’t finished writing out the reply. Depends on the state so no idea sorry.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 05:08 PM
1

Maybe the OP contacted a mod and got the post approved.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 02:58 PM
1

Probably because of who you mentioned in the title. Remove that and it should be fine to repost.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 01:59 PM
1

Then the point the second person made is moot. Edit: My brain melted. The point made by the person who responded to you.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/04/25 11:22 PM
1

Unless that’s badly phrased, it sounds as if he knows the address but is disallowed from entering the property. They’ve written “Not let him in” vs “Not let him know my address.” Either way, both of those responses are delusional. Edit: In reference to this line: Not letting a new and uncommitted partner your address is very reasonable in todays day and age
/r/EverydayMisandry08/04/25 11:16 PM
3

That’s been posted on numerous subreddits. Wasn’t looking for it — was posted to an anti subreddit. <image> The only upside is, she’s only got 200 yt subs.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/04/25 08:49 PM
7

Not so much the latter. They’re focused on issues effecting women and girls. So are a movement specifically for those demographics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 10:05 AM
10

Incompatibilities.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 09:28 AM
1

I’m relying back my thoughts about your post. Edit: The first paragraph is about the title and the rest is about the part in which you mentioned feminists.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 11:03 PM
1

I didn’t state circumcision wasn’t bad.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 11:00 PM
1

I wrote: Sorry, I’m not even sure what you’re trying to convey. The title seems to differ from the post. I suggest starting there. Edit: I’m not even sure what you mean here — you’re throwing a whole lot of accusations.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 03:56 PM
6

Sorry, I’m not even sure what you’re trying to convey. The title seems to differ from the post. The point I took from the title was using parody/satire could be used to pushback against certain things. But you mentioned so far down about some feminists using satire — though it’s more Kafka-esk. Any engagement can and will prove their point. Regardless of the outcome. It will be twisted to fit their agenda. About five years ago, a Baroness suggested implementing a curfew for men — that happened a…
/r/MensRights04/04/25 03:51 PM
0

It’s absolutely true. The draft is much worse than circumcision. The deciding factor would be if it’s an voluntary or involuntary draft. The latter being worse as you’d be a conscientious objector if you objected to being drafted. Which could lead to being incarcerated. Edit: Having no bodily autonomy is better than circumcision? No control over your life whatsoever, where you’re sent to or what your actions are?
/r/MensRights04/04/25 03:27 PM
1

Plus: SheraSeven That’s the sprinkle sprinkle person. Eighty million views on YouTube alone.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/25 01:45 PM
3

Yeah, i suspect this will blow over and nothing of substance will come out of it except awareness. That’s my hope but I’m pessimistic. All depends on course providers in schools and the change from PSHE to RSHE. It comes down to how much pressure is being placed on them. If it’s neutral and teaches boys how to spot issues and what to do — like how domestic violence is perceived between the sexes — I’d be more for it. The vast-majority, at least, are going to take note and change how they approac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/25 11:51 AM
6

The reason I think we are missing a trick here is because we collectively will find it hard to control what our young boys consume in terms of SM Almost the whole argument needs throwing out. It shouldn’t be starting from this is true and correct, it should be from is it actually happening and why. There’s too much ground being conceded. Might as well be agreeing to the whole of it and that males are inherently dangerous and they need to be taught to be good. The press have been playing a dirty …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/25 10:56 AM
6

Or the pay doesn’t go up over time. It may come down to this troubling reality, new research suggests: Work done by women simply isn’t valued as highly. This is more starting with the conclusion then working backwards.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/04/25 07:27 PM
3

What’s the actual point you’re aiming for? That they were killed for being female? Statistically, if fewer male journalists died then the percentage of female journalists is going to go up. Look at the last few sentences of the reply you replied to. There were twenty-nine more male journalists who died in 2022 than in 2021.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 02:47 PM
2

Fewer male journalists died.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 02:44 PM
6

Three children stabbed in Sydney’s Hills District Three children have been stabbed and a woman known to them has been taken to hospital under police guard. Police were called to a home on Jamieson Avenue in Baulkham Hills at around 5.20am on Monday after reports multiple people had been stabbed. Police found three children, a 10-year-old boy, a 13-year-old girl and a 16-year-old girl with stab wounds. A 46-year-old woman, who police say is known to the children, was found with stab wounds. NSW A…
/r/MensRights31/03/25 12:13 AM
25

Doubtful. Even if those individuals started endorsing leftist politicians, they wouldn’t be accepted by the left in any form. They’d use that as an example of grifting and them lacking morals for not standing up for their principles. They’d still be hated by the left. It isn’t to do with who they align with, but the subject matter — you kinda hit that with the last sentence in the third paragraph. As for the manosphere, it’s a mostly unknown word so it’s open to abuse. It’s a play on words with …
/r/MensRights29/03/25 11:18 AM
2

Sorry, I thought you replied to someone stating you were a man.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 12:36 AM
4

Does that include yourself? If you were in a woods they’d be a man in the woods. Because that man would be you. So who are you gonna bury then?
/r/MensRights29/03/25 12:18 AM
1

I didn’t say it was. Are you reading the words I’m typing out? For the past few replies, you’ve seemingly ignored what I’ve written.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 11:13 AM
3

We’re talking past each other. It’s a aspect used in religion. It isn’t mutually exclusive to it. Nothing I wrote up there conflicts with what you wrote here. So kinda confused.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 12:03 AM
2

Going along with that mindset, it would be boys need to be taught morals or be taught to be good. And they’ll always be shrouded in an original sin for being born male. In a strict religious sense, anyone who doesn’t follow religion or are atheists don’t have morals. Morals are bestowed upon the religious by a higher force or taught through religious teachings. In short, humans don’t have secular morality. PS not sure if it’s limited to Christians or Abrahamic religions.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 10:09 PM
3

That’s almost encroaching on religious moral hierarchicalism.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 08:51 PM
2

Still smells like patriarchy in here though… PS just remembered the sideburns joke from the Simpsons.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 08:33 PM
3

Did the OP just post this and not respond to anyone? I don’t think it’s been mentioned, eligibility of the vote was based on land or house, ownership or rental. Which meant eligible voters had an investment within that society and their family. I can’t see a situation in which they wouldn’t at least talk to those family members. It’s weird how these arguments are framed. As if men’s— or indeed anyone’s — lives’ aren’t influenced by the people they’re closest to. As opposed to the implication the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/25 08:30 PM
4

It’s planned to go down to zero — for the 2025/2026 period. Now what?
/r/MensRights27/03/25 06:21 PM
2

It’s engagement farming. So the OOP wouldn’t do that — that would probably alienate his target audience. It’s taking two unacceptables and not going beyond that and hoping the reader will add their own biases to it and respond in kind.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 02:07 AM
6

Sorry, I just lost all interest whilst reading through it. Technically yes, in this sense: Many have experienced shame simply for being male. Many come from broken families. In their search for peer support online, they have come to believe that feminism – and women – are responsible for their negative experiences and their problems. … My opinion of Tate would change drastically if he dropped the ego-centric and materialistic persona-side and embraced his full focus on society addressing the iss…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 01:54 AM
-5

Annoy you in what sense? Edit: I’d have said no it isn’t worth watching. I did put thought in to asking a different question like did you watch Severance — if you didn’t you’d probably not like this series. It’s similar in one aspect — there’s no drama imho. But it ultimately comes down to taste. So all I can state is, watch it if you want to know specifics about the series, or don’t.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/25 10:53 PM
3

Everyone’s talking about the Netflix documentary Adolescence — and rightly so. It shines a spotlight on the disturbing rise of online influencers like Andrew Tate and how their content is shaping the attitudes of young boys, especially around masculinity, control, and misogyny. But here’s the other side of the conversation we must have… 📲 What about the girls? Lily Phillips recently revealed she slept with 101 men in one day as part of a filmed “adult content” stunt—and has even stated she wants…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 12:20 PM
3

He’s the male version of Laura Bates.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 08:08 PM
6

I don’t think they’ll be a huge backlash. In general they’re more of a danger to themselves than anyone else. Minimum, it’s fewer relationships, marriages, and families. At worst there’s an increase in suicidality and self-harm.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 08:04 PM
17

Because they’re pushing these individuals towards it by assuming the worst and not actually talking to them as people or humans.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 05:00 PM
8

Sorry, I’m confused. So this person wrote a fictional drama series based on what he supposedly found online — which didn’t really go beyond 20/80 and a few other talking points — and he’s trying to draw parallels between that and real life? And he wants radical intervention, even though the government have been trying to tackle disruptive behaviour for possibly decades. With new approaches, taking place, every so many years — take PSHE, which is briefly mentioned in the series. And programs by t…
/r/MensRights22/03/25 04:57 PM
2

That’s got to be a troll — that’s a r/dragonballz moderator. Edit: The OOP is messed up. Got roasted on r/asklesbians for opinions. TIL… A new word — sapphic.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/03/25 12:24 PM
21

There’s no real solid answer at the end. His parents blamed their lack of oversight as to what he was doing online. The implication with the father was, somehow his anger was passed onto the son. The father didn’t want to repeat what he experienced with his father but he couldn’t constructively deal with his anger issues. The child was angry but there didn’t seem to be target of that anger. He also lacked empathy. There was one scene that was reminiscent of Taxi Driver. When he was talking to th…
/r/MensRights20/03/25 04:06 AM
3

Weird. Originally I opened a incognito window and just went straight to the subreddit. The other subreddit is still there.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/03/25 01:25 AM
6

It’s been made private. The custom message is: unhinged femoid containment area. lockdown protocol initiated. No idea if that means anything — like use a different subreddit or a off-site forum. Edit: Just read the other post.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/03/25 09:15 PM
3

And they rarely get over 10k signatures. This one’s from 2020: Victims of rape and sexual violence show immense courage in coming forward – and they must have confidence that the right support will be there when it is needed. All non-consensual sexual activity is dealt with by specific serious offences, including those that can be committed by a man or a woman. The sentences available are significant and reflect the seriousness of the offending. Sexual violence against men is treated just as ser…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 01:45 PM
1

Not my petition. Found it when looking for a previous one with a response from the government.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 12:34 AM
1

Other factors should be used for a comparison since a life sentence is the maximum and that’s used for the most egregious offenders. The minimum sentences, average sentences, and any stigma attached to the offence would be better indicators — rape vs. sexual assault. Also because there’s two offence categories depending on the sex of the perpetrator, it plays in to the myth men commit 99% of rapes — and the 1%, that’s comprised of women who’ve been convicted on the basis of joint enterprise. Edi…
/r/MensRights14/03/25 11:47 PM
2

You’re relying to a different person. Edit: He had every freedom available to put an end to the payments a lot sooner than he did, he chose not to? Replied because of this part here and how it seemed you didn’t read the article. Yes, he seemingly chose to continue payments until his circumstances changed.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 08:37 PM
6

Maybe actually read the article: Last month, he applied to be legally removed as the twins' father in a bid to stop paying child maintenance as he has now been forced to retire through illness. That’s why. Seems he was fine with the payments but because of ill health he wants his name removed from the certificate along with any obligation to pay for child maintenance. Edit: But Mr Justice Cobb, allowing Mr J's application, said that, under the law at the time the twins were conceived, he was not…
/r/MensRights14/03/25 06:52 PM
1

Individuals posting on a forum actually does create a movement. It breeds, develops and births a movement. It’s how many start out. But not necessarily. What’s the actual end goal? You’ve got individuals who are having issues in dating. Somewhat of a shared interest. The incel movement itself is labelled as a terrorist organisation. Don’t get mad at me, I didn’t decide that now did I. Jesus, that’s funny. If someone thinks every single lonely male is an incel, then they don’t understand the defi…
/r/MensRights14/03/25 08:55 AM
1

Then focus on the ones you agree with instead of posting a dismissive response. Or I don’t know, don’t.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 08:22 AM
1

It is concerning yes. Sure, there’s an issue with young men and the incel movement Individuals posting on forums doesn’t make a movement. Also a movement is tied to an action not an absence of an action. which is rightly labelled on terrorist watchlists As what? If it was on the basis of misogyny, then it’d make more sense to label that as either misogyny or male supremacy. but there’s a difference between a lonely man and an incel. Only really on the basis of who’s defining it or applying the l…
/r/MensRights14/03/25 08:20 AM
4

Are the last two replies jokes? They seem to be implying they wouldn’t tell the truth either. Edit: No one was used instead of no man.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/25 12:55 AM
2

#5 or #7 <image>
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/25 07:59 PM
62

Everything you wrote is a moot point. Britain isn’t a Muslim country.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 11:53 PM
1

Previous poster is probably dyslexic.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 12:50 PM
8

Just two questions: Do you believe the patriarchy exists? You do know which subreddit you’re posting in? It’s a bit of an odd question but you do have a bad opinion of the manosphere. The above article would include men’s rights to be part of that. Edit: Asked those questions because the previous poster posted this: Despite my deep depise for them, manosphere and redpill do exist. I view them as harmful, delusional, and advocates of patriarchy, but they do brand themselves as “helping men.” Pers…
/r/MensRights07/03/25 02:17 AM
0

Wat
/r/MensRights05/03/25 10:38 PM
3

Edit: I will say, it is very ironic that the comments on that post also asking for examples, were provided with no examples either lmao Yeah, that’s why I posted it. It’s probably been posted before and it’ll be posted again. It’s easy enough to claim that happens but it’s difficult to prove it is and the whole thing undermines this subreddit. It could be used as a motte and bailey. Claim propaganda is being posted on here so nothing should be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 12:35 PM
6

Found this going through the OPs comment history: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/vCli8EuUdw Not really much clearer. The only thing I can think of is the conscript videos. Also what’s with the odd conversation that’s been downvoted? Reminds me of what happens when you place two Furbies in front of each other.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 01:04 AM
2

The first screenshot is confusing as it looks like a Pizzey video (she started Chitswich Women’s Aid in 1971 which became Refuge in the 90s). Either way, anyone who frames it that manner — like the person who replied — should be immediately dismissed and ignored.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/03/25 12:03 AM
10

First of all, the act of female genital mutilation is very different from the act of male circumcision and you not understanding that is gross. You don’t even understand there’s different forms of it which include scraping and genitalia piecing. Look up the last definition by the World Heath Organisation. As for the rest, you’ve got to be seriously trolling. Edit: For everyone’s sake, could you at least quote properly. Separate what you’re quoting from what you are writing.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 12:53 PM
7

This is part of a much bigger set. Think there were eighteen screenshots in total. There’s two problems here. One is it’s Twitter, unless it’s by verifiable individuals or groups, it should be ignored. There’s too many shitposters and engagement farms — they’ll post anything to get a reaction. And second, there were calls to start counting suicide by domestic violence. Vaguely remember reading a Guardian article from a few years back. Seems there’s some papers on the subject. One by the National…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/25 01:53 PM
4

Probably referring to this: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/fwO0pqTBGZ
/r/MensRights27/02/25 11:59 PM
4

The comment section — on that post — is a cesspool imo.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/02/25 01:28 AM
7

Why are you treating Elon Musk and trumps word as the word of God? This is a straw argument. You made that. I was pointing out the bait and switch and not engaging with your disingenuous arguments.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 12:37 AM
9

Nice bait and switch — you’re not arguing against the point in question but a completely separate one.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 11:49 PM
1

That’s not the definition for patriarchy. It’s a mish-mash. Patriarchy has existed for millennia.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/02/25 01:07 AM
1

You’ve got to imagine the audience that would read that and in turn, not only not donate anything, but have a negative reaction to the notion of helping men. They’re hoping the reader will be self-aware enough they’ll put some thought into it and think about the men who they (or other people) have lost. Think Pizzey talked about issues with fund raising for a men’s shelter. This somewhat overlaps with this. Edit: Or read the statement by Movember in which they state men don’t have intrinsic valu…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 01:04 AM
2

That's a much better than your previous reply and the OP. I dont really understand the consequences that people in this forum and related communities draw from that realization though. So I ask questions about the points where I draw different conclusions or about parts of the logic that dont make sense to me. They're posting examples of misandry. Quoting from the OP: Second post here, not from a RP-background. Ive seen the term patriarchy being used here and in other RP-contexts And? There's no…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/25 07:10 PM
3

What are you even on about?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/25 06:17 PM
7

One, this has nothing to do with patriarchy and second, what do you even mean? This includes any man trying to strike up a conversation. There’s no meat to it. It’s probably a none story. Hoping the media coverage will increase business. Edit: Previous poster is trolling — and failing.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 09:47 PM
6

Also men oppress women — 6th image
/r/EverydayMisandry14/02/25 09:38 PM
8

And it’s an actual thing in India. Look at the subreddit name. Also if it was an arranged marriage, he could be accused of rape. PS I don’t agree with you about reimbursement.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/02/25 12:48 AM
1

Why did you make that reply about yourself? It’s weird. That person was supporting your views. It wasn’t about you or women — they was being used to reference men.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 05:22 PM
11

You’re gonna have to expand on that.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 10:44 AM
1

The weird thing none of them would look back on their actions and have regret. The consequences were huge.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 10:29 AM
7

Some surrounded the accused students on campus and shouted “confess! Confess!” Might be a separate incident. This reminds of some opportunistic coverage I saw. This group would gather outside of their fraternity on a morning and would shout “It’s time to fess up! (sic)” whilst bashing pots and pans together.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 01:21 AM
22

The OOP doesn’t know know if he was sexualising her. Maybe it was a compliment — just as she did and he was being polite and returned the compliment — or he was being sarcastic or it was a joke. It’s a similar action in return.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/12/24 06:31 PM
4

You’re not calling anyone out, silly.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 11:27 PM
7

That’s original. Twisting it around and putting the blame on men. Do you remember this post? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/gChsTH7GCx
/r/MensRights22/12/24 11:24 PM
12

The blame is placed elsewhere. For them, that would mean it’s either the fault of men or the fabled patriarchy. otherwise they would end feminazism and bring back family values. That’s got to be a joke?
/r/MensRights22/12/24 08:51 PM
13

Tester -- can I actually post here? Edit: Can’t post either the article or a archive link. Keeps getting automatically deleted. Edit: Used a TL;DR generator/AI: The article discusses Jess Phillips, the UK's minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, and her efforts to tackle the issue of violence against women and girls. Phillips has been deeply affected by the high-profile case in France involving a woman named Gisèle Pelicot, who was drugged and raped by her ex-husband and…
/r/MensRights22/12/24 02:29 PM
1

Can't post the text from the article so here's a archive link: https://archive.is/2024.12.22-113149/https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/jess-phillips-metoo-pushed-teenage-boys-towards-andrew-tate-k88vq05nf
/r/MensRights22/12/24 02:29 PM
15

Im a dude and I guarantee you, men are not only shitty to just women. They just aren’t afraid to be shitty to woman cause won’t punch them in the face. Men are shitty to everyone. Men are adult children..basically the problem with this world 99% is because of men I especially like this one — second screenshot, minimised comment.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/24 07:33 PM
14

https://www.humanite.fr/feminisme/feminicides/proces-de-mazan-allmen-quand-la-possibilite-de-viol-et-de-feminicide-se-trouve-dans-tous-les-hommes That’s just something else. Didn’t think it’d get as bad as that. That’s potential fuel for misandrists/whiteknights for years. The truth is simple: men kill women. We kill women. I kill women. And this will not change by adopting a charter of good conduct, by simply putting men in prison, or else we should all get into it, preventively. It is the whol…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 10:29 AM
3

Yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 09:26 PM
3

So anyone can misuse a term to describe anyone regardless of the validity of it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 08:45 PM
19

I agree that a lot of feminism is not productive in achieving gender equality because of the hypocrisy that can easily develop. I do think that comes from men steamrolling us with whataboutism everytime we talk about our issues though, which is why I was interested in this sub in the first place as a place that seems to talk about men’s issues independently & not as a gotcha for women. There’s just so much to unpack here. It’s divisionary. You’ve got your side you’ve defined as being women and t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 12:32 PM
2

Yeah, that was the women’s rights movement and the suffrages (there were two movements, I sometimes get them mixed up, one was involved in terrorism).
/r/MensRights12/12/24 12:32 AM
6

The problem there lies with the fact that men and women had equal voting rights up until 1832 when the law was changed to specifically exclude women. Take this. Which actual law? You stated up to 1918, so that’d be the Property Act? As land ownership and rental was the man requirement for voting. Not sex. You are aware the white feather movement was started by a man, right? Which was derived from Four Feathers — a boy entering adulthood. A rite of passage. PS you mentioned 1884 — the Third Refor…
/r/MensRights12/12/24 12:25 AM
5

What in the actual heck is this? I took more than a few seconds to work out both were connected. I initially thought that was a sarcastic response to the header.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/24 04:49 PM
1

It reads as third-person — as if you’re discussing the thoughts and opinions of people other than yourself. It’s very weird. Is this a rewrite of a response by a AI? I asked ChatGPT about punching up and the response covered the same aspects right up to the Harris example.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/24 10:29 PM
1

Yeah, I misread their post
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/24 11:14 PM
1

This raises numerous questions… It’d be limited to unidentified dead bodies. Edit: Misread
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/24 07:40 PM
30

https://www.nrk.no/nordland/ung-kvinne-hadde-over-10.000-videoer-som-seksualiserer-barn-_-slipper-fengsel-1.17141832
/r/MensRights26/11/24 07:24 PM
2

It focuses on domestic abuse of men, which is often done by women of male’s in the women’s family. What does this even mean?
/r/MensRights21/11/24 11:29 PM
8

Woman can falsely accuse this guy whose name has been made public for years and can’t be legally named for doing so. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/34
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/24 12:52 PM
9

That was a bit of a oh moment. Originally thought the name was something to do with mentos mints.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/24 05:30 PM
1

Gatekeeping? Regardless, I can still discuss the topic.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:24 PM
1

I’m not sure where I brought up voting. Though, if you were secure with your choice being needlessly defensive doesn’t suit you. Causation. What was the event behind 4B to be initially posted about and become trending? It was the US election. I’m not in the US. Ah, you’ve cracked the code. Yes, women needing rights that men have too—what a radical concept! I mean The Equal Pay Act right? Maybe tomorrow we’ll discover the sky is blue. In the US they’ve had the Equal Pay Act since the sixties. Tan…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:13 AM
1

Are any of not surprised? Surprised about what? Someone getting angry over someone they don’t like being voted into office? As a dude with a sack I care about men’s rights, but women need them too. What was the point of this sentence? Do women need men’s rights too? Every person has the right to refuse a relationship if it isn’t equitable for them. A bit of a tangent and you’re the only one who mentioned that. The old traditional model for marriage no longer works for a myriad of reasons. List t…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 10:53 PM
1

Why does that make a difference? It’s a pro-Democrat video — that falls under Poe’s Law — so it’s been tied by association. Put some leg work into it and find out who created it. Edit: I’ll take that as you won’t put any research in to this whatsoever. Flip the script. If it was a Republican video in the same vein — the creator was unknown and it fell under Poe’s Law — would you state it’s misinformation to tie it to that party? You’re partisan so you’d probably not give a shit and state it’s a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 12:55 AM
3

The fact that this subreddit is so fond of anti-Harris misinformation makes all of this tricky. What misinformation do you believe is being spread? You’ve stated it’s in connection to political adverts but not any specifics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 12:30 AM
1

Which thing? Overturn or constitutional right? I forgot to mention: Where did male on male violence come from?
/r/MensRights05/11/24 05:34 PM
2

I’m not the original person you responded to. That should’ve been the main issue brought up during the midterms. Because overturning Roe v. Wade means it’s down to the individual states to set their own laws regarding abortion. Unless Harris has explicitly stated she’s going to either overturn it and reinstate Roe v. Wade or make abortion a constitutional right what’s going to change?
/r/MensRights05/11/24 05:31 PM
2

Are you even bothering to read the responses you’re replying to?
/r/MensRights05/11/24 05:16 PM
10

You’re not owed anything including any explanations.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 01:50 AM
3

The Guardian has a few of these articles — one pretty recently about dropping male fertility rates, and another about women freezing their eggs. What’s been overlooked though is, this article (and one of the Guardian articles) is an advert for a book.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 09:08 PM
2

Odd. Edit: Looks like all but that one is invisible. Edit2: Yeah if you were blocked, it’d act like the account doesn’t exist by displaying a 404 page.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/24 06:31 PM
1

Probably blocked you. It’s still there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/24 06:29 PM
3

OP also posted this, a few days ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/jr0RMUbmUm
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 11:37 PM
18

But why refer to the source of these issues as patriarchy? It already had a definition and adding to it further dilutes its meaning. There could be multiple people stating they’re against the patriarchy for different reasons, using different definitions. Without a caveat, it’s almost meaningless to state you’re against the patriarchy when another person could have a completely different definition of it. What you outlined is more inline with the biological need or drive to reproduce and mixing t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/24 07:40 PM
3

The post is about an analysis of a fictional character. If you’re going to complain at least be truthful.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 07:21 PM
10

Are you just throwing things and seeing what sticks?
/r/MensRights15/10/24 08:38 PM
9

There’s a pretty recent video of something similar. A drunk guy touched a security guards’ beard and got knocked out, as he was falling he bashed his head against a table. The only other one I can think of was a drunk Irishman trying to get another man to dance with him. Kept brushing up against him. Then he got knocked out. There’s probably others I’ve blocked out. The videos on here can be nightmare material. Edit: Think I’ve seen a few aggressor videos. Typically they get knocked out with the…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 09:19 PM
1

Think it was a stroke. The problem though is because there’s too many lies there’s no way of knowing. If it’s who I think you mean, the original claim was he was beaten up pretty badly which lead to him having a stroke. Then him getting attacked and him even being there was disputed (something about him already being in hospital having had a stroke prior to the event — there’s CCTV that places him there inside the building unharmed). Excluding that officer, several died. But they were there at t…
/r/MensRights11/10/24 11:25 AM
2

It also applies to the US. The only difference seems to be this graph which starts with: Young men continue to out-earn women in the US, though non-college men’s economic status has fallen steeply
/r/MensRights25/09/24 07:07 PM
5

Yeah, it’s behind a partial paywall. For some reason I can view it on mobile (webview and browser) but not on a computer.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 11:08 PM
2

I’ve seen a few of these before. The url is annoying. Kept reading it as fari dad. Either way, she’s got nothing on Vogon’s when it comes to poetry.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/09/24 12:08 AM
53

Found this in the comments: How on earth did she get a job at a domestic violence charity? She has a restraining order against her and a record of violence and mental health issues, the charity is supposed to be opposed to domestic violence, not sponsoring it! That’s a very good question (and a pretty sobering joke). More so considering how many treat teenage boys (think a minority don’t allow boys from twelve and the vast majority don’t allow boys that are eighteen and above) and men (being tol…
/r/MensRights19/09/24 06:09 PM
5

I wondered why Marvel was publishing the newer Alien and Predator comics. Now it makes sense.
/r/MensRights16/09/24 12:18 AM
1

If we’re discussing the same I disagree. Off the top of my head, the first two were hanging then overdose.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 11:57 PM
2

If the aim is to kill yourself wouldn’t the goal then be to kill yourself. You can’t retry if you were successful can you now? Edit: Also, what’s with links to Medium? Without joining there’s little point in reading any of the posts. They’re not enticing enough and in the case of the above link, most just seem to be pretty rubbish. The premise of that post is victim blaming and linking violence as something intrinsic to males — they use more lethal methods, they don’t care about the state of the…
/r/MensRights10/09/24 12:01 AM
2

However, some felt ‘disappointed’ by what they felt was the star suggesting we ‘change language to make men feel more comfortable’. This stuck out to me. On the face of this, this is wrong. The suggestion is to include men instead of purposely excluding them and demonising them for being men. The problem though is, did Alterton mean within feminism or within a different movement. It sounds like the latter.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 07:33 PM
3

Almost as badly as you butchered this.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 07:04 PM
4

I don’t know who the guy is so to me both are irrelevant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 06:07 PM
3

You’re not going to answer any questions. Cool. Edit: They’re not going to be posting anything positive about Depp are they? Edit2: I don’t even know who the guy is. I did ask what’s the significance of this is and didn’t get a straight answer. I also asked about the video in question and I got a you didn’t read it properly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 05:46 PM
5

That’s going to be the official account. That Depp was the abuser and Heard was his victim. That’s not going to change.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 05:45 PM
1

I’ve read it multiple times. He refers to something called a B side video. As for the rest, yes, I verified it. I mentioned that and yes, that’s a biased subreddit. What’s your issue? Edit: It’s biased so therefore relevant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 05:42 PM
7

Agree to disagree. What exactly did he put in the video?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 05:35 PM
12

The letter itself just reads as a path of least resistance apology. Typically corporate entities issue these. A few issues. One it’s posted in r/DeppDelusion (they’re biased) and I can’t tell if that’s FD Signifier or not. The title suggests posting on behalf. PS did some digging. He did a AMA on menslib a few years back. So would seem that’s his account. Edit: Forgot: What’s the significance of this? It was pretty much over when that open letter was published imo.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 05:22 PM
25

Smith is historically illiterate. Those are old taking points with a author’s name shoehorned in. Wollstonecraft was scathing all round imho. She was probably misanthropic.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 12:47 AM
3

You’re not gonna get one. It’s always an assertion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/24 09:37 AM
2

Not the previous poster. It’s in reference to the political alignment of this subreddit — in other words, the conservatives are aware conservatism is misandrist Edit: Have noticed a few claim this subreddit isn’t left wing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/24 11:26 PM
1

He calls himself a “classical liberal”. How many years ago was that? Someone’s opinion and political alignment can change over the years. Benjamin is on the right and has been there for many years imho.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 06:15 PM
2

I thought that subreddit had rules against generalisations and sexism? They break their own rules then complain whoever is in opposition to them is doing the same thing and it’s wrong. It’s just a huge incel circlejerk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/24 05:57 PM
1

Another outlandish reply? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/tZy57YxalG
/r/MensRights26/07/24 01:21 AM
8

Which part? The OP of that post isn’t liked around here. Edit: Cherry picked responses -- the top post quoted this: The red pill. The largest segment of men's rights advocates that has a decidedly conservative slant to it. It mostly deals with the realities of the psychology of women and how those affect men and how men need to be aware of it and live their life in such a manner as to protect themselves from the problems it can create in our lives. It's way down on that post with 11 upvotes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/24 07:12 PM
23

Read the article — violence in schools isn’t the main focus of the article
/r/MensRights25/07/24 01:28 AM
1

No, I don’t believe there’s a male equivalent as close as that. There’s a number of G4S run prisons that have put emphasis on education, understanding individual perpetration, and cutting reoffending rates. To an extent, that reflects with government run prisons. But when it comes to aesthetics, men’s prisons are utilitarian.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 01:07 AM
0

I don’t agree with your assessment.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 12:12 AM
0

That’s what they always say. Just “trust the science” guys! All of the “experts” agree! Yeah, just because they ignore dissenting voices doesn’t mean they’ve vanished. Doesn’t look good, ¯_(ツ)_/¯ That’s just noise. That was probably part of her opening speech and they’ve reused it to pad the article. Any particular reason that you thought “Feminist professor to lead shake-up of national curriculum” wouldn’t be helpful? It’s rather more explicit in her position and beliefs, and those of Labour’s …
/r/MensRights19/07/24 11:28 PM
0

I don’t know where you get that idea that women are vile, unhelpful creatures, but that narrative gotta stop Now point out where vile came from. You added that hence strawman.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 06:55 PM
0

No-one stated any of those things. You added them.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 06:05 PM
5

I don’t know where you get that idea that women are vile, unhelpful creatures, but that narrative gotta stop “What we’ve got here is a failure to communicate.” What’s with this strawman and your other reply (the one further down)?
/r/MensRights17/07/24 11:33 PM
5

Yeah, reminds me of this: <image> Further down: “After a cataclysmic event like this, domestic violence peaks,” she told reporters. “Women become extremely unsafe, when generally the men return home from the fires and subject them to domestic violence.” https://au.news.yahoo.com/fury-after-activist-links-firefighters-to-domestic-violence-231716546.html Edit: “What happens when domestic violence perpetrators finish their work on the frontline of a major crisis?” Moody wrote the men “abuse the wom…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/24 06:23 PM
1

The link redirects to something else.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 04:35 PM
2

Not really, no. Newspapers haven’t been pushing that angle and I haven’t seen any op-eds. The press seem pretty neutral and they didn’t jump to any conclusions. The only outrage seems to be coming from the usual misandrists. There’s some odd vernacular usage in some of the posts — usually alongside a Atwood quote — as if they want to start a national outrage. But it doesn’t look like they’re gaining any ground. At most there might be a review for the laws surrounding crossbows.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 12:26 AM
1

Never too sure if it's laziness on their part or they know that women read more than men, their potential readers won't notice the poor understanding of men's motivations. Is that a recent development? I know Atwood made a critique about writing male characters in the 80s. It’s an annoying read as it’s all over the place.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 07:30 PM
1

You can link them from other platforms and if it’s hosted on one of the major sites, the scripts take care of the rest.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 11:58 PM
3

If you went through Whybros’ Tweet history you’ve got to admit it’s ironic. I’ve spent a while trawling through all I could. Going as far back as April. Seems they’ve put a limit on how far back you can go on timelines but you can still search for older Tweets. On another note, I may have suffered brain damage.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/24 10:37 PM
5

If was in reference to the justice system. I’ve checked the Tweet thread in question and one other. Can’t be bothered addressing anything else.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/24 10:31 PM
5

Damn TinMen, you start of by kotowing to feminism Really? Have you not learnt that MOST men also did not have the right to vote, or much of any other rights. Not sure what I can state. The video popped up in my suggestions so posted it. Thought it was another vanilla video of his. Checked on here and it seems it wasn’t posted so added it. I don’t want to put words in his mouth so all I can probably really state is, I thought that was known. He’s on the left and at minimum, he’s sympathetic towar…
/r/MensRights07/07/24 12:14 PM
4

I completely forgot about the Prison Reform Trust aspect. I thought because of the work he does within his company it’d include men. But then I remembered that aspect and re-read the article.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 12:00 PM
5

Was going to post this yesterday. There was something I originally wanted to add but initially forgot. From 2016 up to this appointment, he was the Chair of the Prison Reform Trust. From the above article: Alongside running his key cutting business, the 52-year-old is the chair of UK charity the Prison Reform Trust, which aims to reduce imprisonment and improve conditions for inmates and families. But here’s the real kicker. Even though men make up about 95% of the prison population in the UK, m…
/r/MensRights07/07/24 11:29 AM
11

I don't that was their motives. What’s the end goal? It is definitely true that most of men's problems are from other men. In what sense? You could mean in general or when it comes to crime. You’ve left it open enough you could switch to, well it’s men who do x, y, or z — they’re the vast majority of perpetrators, they’re law makers, they enforce the patriarchy, etc. Men murder, harass and even rape other men. So that isn't too far fetched to say. Maybe you should’ve left it at murder. It really…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 12:27 AM
4

I’m not sure it’s a myth as it’s acknowledged but then it switches to well, who’s harming those men. Discussions around this are usually more like dialogue trees and whenever something is countered they move on to the next claim. PS just thought of something whilst typing this out. There’s an air of bitterness or resentfulness around this and there’s layers of contradiction presented similar to a gotcha. Like women have to be aware of their surroundings and men don’t have any worries. But that c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/24 11:37 PM
5

It’s how men should view any form of interaction from women. If a woman pays a man attention regardless of form he should be grateful. i give y'all no quarter. rage down vote me, just be sure you cover up your ankles lest you offend your neighbors whilst you do it. Way to go and strawman the heck out of this completely.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 12:56 PM
16

Be yourself and the right people will be there, the wrong people will immediately detach themselves and leave. No, they won’t. You don’t truly know the people around you until you need them and everybody is invested in their own life.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 01:23 AM
6

The funny way of looking at that is, if fewer men committed suicide then in terms of percentages more women committed suicide. “Startling new trend. More women are committing suicide…”
/r/MensRights29/06/24 01:13 AM
13

Reminds me of an anti-freeze poisoning case. The father died and there wasn’t an investigation — was blamed on his “unhealthy” lifestyle. Then the son died under similar circumstances, an autopsy was performed but still no investigation — was blamed on his seizures. Then finally one of the daughters was taken to hospital and admitted to the ICU with a brain bleed. Then bam, someone actually took note, the hospital suspected poisoning, and the police actually started an investigation.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 12:55 AM
1

Maybe I’m missing something. That isn’t an equivalent and in the case of the OP your previous advice probably wouldn’t work. It would probably exacerbate things. Also anyone who unironically uses #killallmen probably wouldn’t have an empathetic response to those stories. To be able to feel empathy, they’d have to be able to see men as being human and being not much different than themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/24 12:03 AM
11

It’s been upvoted several hundred times more in the past few hours
/r/MensRights24/06/24 06:58 PM
2

If y'all actually believe that there's not a single man on this planet that benefits from it, you're morons Why do you keep talking past everyone you’ve responded to. Every time you’ve responded to me it hasn’t been about what I’ve responded to, but whatever you made it to be. Take this. What are you doing here? No one thinks that yet you keep pulling this shit. For example, the term "fragile masculinity" was originally about one of the ways that "the patriarchy" oppresses men and is directly li…
/r/MensRights21/06/24 12:47 AM
6

Like, yeah of course it's going to benefit some people, did you think the patriarchy was just an orphan crushing machine that created pain and suffering for the benefit of no one? So you like to strawman? No, the point was you changed the language then stated that’s been discredited by academics. Whatever you added in there was your doing. I didn't want to continue debating in this thread because the 10 minute timeout between each message is extremely annoying, and I didn't have the mental stren…
/r/MensRights19/06/24 07:50 PM
6

Yup, I understood some of those words. Edit: The OP is wrong. It’s never been used in that context and instead, it was used to bash men. Even if that was the case, it’d be referred to — as the previous poster pointed out — the patriarchy backfiring.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 07:38 PM
7

benefits all men has been largely discarded by academics. Ah, you’re playing a word game. You’ve switched men with all men, then went, well all men aren’t benefitted by the patriarchy so that isn’t true. Isn't this kind of a strawman? Yeah, what you wrote is a kind of a strawman.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 07:37 PM
2

Intentionally misgendering trans people’s gender falls in line with hating their gender, so for trans women, it’s misogyny. Thought it was more to do with them being perceived as MTF. That’s the root of the threat narrative — that they used to be men and men are a threat to women. The problem with that though, it’s gotten to the stage it’s effecting biological women. You flip it around and see what changes. With FTM that threat narrative isn’t there. There’s some level of homophobia as they coul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/24 12:11 AM
7

Something’s been cut off?
/r/EverydayMisandry15/06/24 10:35 PM
17

The UN post is still up on Facebook. Someone posted a link to it a few weeks back. And it’s still on Twitter (just checked): https://x.com/un/status/1461394271324426250 Edit: Happy #InternationalMensDay to all the male allies around the world who support women, defy gender roles, fight gender-based violence & stand up for equality. @UN_Women invites everyone, everywhere, to support #GenerationEquality. https://unwomen.org/en
/r/MensRights15/06/24 02:31 PM
23

What are you doing here OP? Problem is most of the violence is done by other men https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1dfgs9l/comment/l8ki9u6/ You guys really do whine about things that help benefit women. Instead of solving men's problems which are largely caused by men themselves, you instead want to dog on anything even remotely helping women. This is pathetic. Edit- huh looks like the comments are disagreeing with you after all. Maybe there is hope to this subreddjt. https…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/24 12:40 PM
0

OP would probably point to this one: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/xijRDOqtRr
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/24 12:01 PM
1

Are you using translation tools? Because what you wrote doesn’t make sense. Did you mean the Ferengi using the word female or something else?
/r/MensRights09/06/24 10:54 AM
19

Found the article using their keyword system (domestic violence vs violence against women and girls). I was trying to find the article about a upcoming report. Thought I’d explain why I posted this. As with almost any article it frames it as an gendered issue. That men are the perpetrators and women are the victims (of male violence). The boys and men most at risk of perpetration, Seidler says, are a “massively overlooked part of the equation”, largely because empathy of any kind – including del…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/24 12:39 AM
23

Yeah, it’s a shittier version of Marmite
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/24 11:57 PM
2

The pervious poster butchered their example. In DS9 Ferengi society is portrayed as being misogynistic.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 10:14 PM
14

That link probably needs its own post
/r/EverydayMisandry06/06/24 06:49 PM
1

I think in the metaphor the Diet Coke offsets the calories of the Coke, meaning you think you're getting something really bad, but in fact it was a set up for something good No, calories. The calories from the Diet Coke offsetting those from the Big Mac. This is ironic given this thread began with me being tone-policed about the paragraph discussing my preconceptions about Men's Rights groups. Yeah, I'll concede. There's truth to that. My issue was more with, you bring that up but there doesn't …
/r/MensRights06/06/24 02:38 AM
2

I don't know of a neutral definition. Think I read a quote by Ian Ironwood. He published a book entitled The Manosphere.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 01:11 AM
3

u/Clemicus does this comment (above) qualify as one that might give people the impression I originally had of MRAs? No. I was referring to this: I have to admit, I haven't previously taken much interest in "men's rights" because of the way the subject has been represented by Men's Rights Activists—simply regurgitating regressive, misogynistic ideologies, while playing victim, simply because they don't have everything their own way any more. But I have now found my attitude to the subject—saying,…
/r/MensRights05/06/24 12:15 AM
4

I hope it was made clear at the end of that paragraph that this was an attitude I conceded... And a Diet Coke offsets the calories of a Big Mac. But you must be aware of how the group has, in the past, portrayed itself in public, it wasn't people talking about MRAs that gave me the impression I had of MRAs, it was listening to people identifying as MRAs. Thankfully this is less and less true as the discussion matures. Could you give examples of these individuals you were listening to and the rea…
/r/MensRights04/06/24 08:39 AM
11

Your better argument would have been men getting into fights. I can tell you the unit was 90 percent men; drunk driving, gunshots, drunk boating, racing, alcohol intoxication, drugs, gang banging drug deals and MANY attempted suicides. Nice padded list. Most our suicide attempts male or female often had high blood alcohol at the time. Alcohol is a depressant, so 🤷‍♂️ Depression affects women more often than men but men are more likely to kill themselves to escape their pain. Why did you feel it …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/24 07:26 PM
55

It goes way further than that. There’s a yearly revised book entitled “Equal Treatment Bench Book” https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/updates/magistrates-court/item/equal-treatment-bench-book/
/r/MensRights31/05/24 05:43 PM
1

They both believe in the patriarchy — probably along the lines of a society created by men for the sole benefit of men, how it subjugates women and girls, and how male violence is used, etc.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 09:17 PM
4

Doesn’t look like the OP got permission to post this and they’ve posted this numerous times to different subreddits.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 07:45 PM
1

Probably don’t lump all the feminists together. I was responding specifically to that. Why have a distinction between the two?
/r/MensRights30/05/24 07:37 PM
11

Some extra is needed for this. It comes across as men and boys need to do better. It’s a freaking advert for a book for the conservative mindset sprinkled with progressiveness.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 02:17 AM
17

Why? Rowling is a misandrist. She believes pretty much everything they do, including the core tenants. They just differed on a single point which created the division. I don’t think it’s for speaking the truth. The reaction completely outstrips that. It’s phobic levels of hatred. Just go back to last year when that Harry Potter game was announced.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 02:10 AM
4

There’s probably hundreds of TikTok videos with more insane tales than this. There’s no way to outmatch them satirically.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 01:48 AM
11

The title is misleading/doing a lot of heavy lifting. Out of all this: Melinda French Gates announced today (May 28th) a series of investments in gender equality, focused on women’s empowerment. Her focus is not a surprise, given her long-standing global leadership on this issue. As part of this new effort, French Gates has created some dedicated grantmaking funds. As she writes in the New York Times: “I offered 12 people whose work I admire their own $20 million grant-making fund to distribute …
/r/MensRights28/05/24 09:58 PM
10

Thank you for confirming you’re here to troll. As for the rest, you’re wrong 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights26/05/24 09:06 PM
10

You strawmanned the response. Keep up.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 09:04 PM
11

You’re not taking note of who you’re responding to 😂 Selective service is a moot point. The issue with it is, the consequences of not signing up. Paternity accusations is case-by-case and moot as well. That’s the entirety of your argument? There’s no punishment for paternity fraud. What am I supposed to refute that hasn't been refuted? You’re not the official refuter. Edit: You omitted title IX. You don’t believe in fair trials? The accused should have the right to defend themselves — be allowed…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 09:04 PM
9

And this one.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 08:57 PM
15

Like this one you strawmanned.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 08:56 PM
16

You’ll just strawman any response. I can read your other replies.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 08:55 PM
25

So you’re posting in bad faith. Ok, gotcha.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 08:53 PM
2

OP could you expand on it? Which points do you think are good or bad? There’s a few good points and loads of bad points. It essentially blames it on patriarchy and doesn’t propose anything further than the dismantlement of patriarchy. As with pretty much every other piece of feminist literature, it ties who’s in the position of authority with who solely benefits from society. That’s incredibly sneaky.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 04:59 PM
12

The comments are aggravating
/r/MensRights26/05/24 09:57 AM
2

Going by the title this should be the video: https://youtu.be/xEZH6YSQvwA
/r/MensRights23/05/24 07:56 PM
2

I've only skimmed the article and this post, but my friends and I are all 39. We were told to get degrees and be financially independent (at least pre interest rises etc). And? Are you agreeing with the author of the article? I am married and have 2 kids, most of my friends are similar. We have jobs, mix of white collar or otherwise. I feel like I have to work like I don't have kids, parent like I don't work and all in a system that is built for women to prop things up. There’s someone, along wi…
/r/MensRights21/05/24 02:59 PM
1

What’s the difference between female circumcision and female genitalia mutilation? Edit: If it’s the same there’s four different types. See the other reply, the one that mentioned Who (didn’t notice it until now).
/r/MensRights17/05/24 12:25 AM
1

I explained the reasoning behind it and no it wasn’t a conflation. On the face it of, it’s a descriptor for an internal issue or issues. The same way toxic masculinity does. Edit: You have to view it from someone who’s hasn’t heard of the phrase before and their initial thoughts upon hearing it.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 08:59 PM
1

What’s that word for when something becomes a repeatable phrase? My biggest issue with referring to it as a masculinity crisis, is the implication masculinity, at least in those affected men, is the issue. When it’s a mixture of internal and external issues that could be put under the umbrella of increasing indifference (to males) and misandry. When a phrase becomes highly repeatable it’s possible context will be lost and this particular phrase could become a soft phrase and be used as instead o…
/r/MensRights15/05/24 07:47 PM
0

This your alt account? Edit: Other way around
/r/MensRights15/05/24 07:24 PM
1

Maybe someone should have upped the game and changed it to “Man vs 6’3ft Cat”
/r/MensRights15/05/24 07:22 PM
4

in a social worker such blindness seriously affects the help she gives. Yes that’s true but why is that gendered?
/r/MensRights13/05/24 02:27 AM
31

I’m not willing to attack a woman when I don’t know what happened. That really isn’t anti man. Really? Your other posts. You’re only here to troll. And at some point you’ll just create yet another account.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 04:10 PM
2

Patriarchy is a phantom. They took the dictionary definition and bastardised it. Then took all these separate adjacent aspects within society and mushed them together. Also patriarchy is interchangeable with men. It’s either men in the past created it, it’s other men who created the situation or laws, expanded strawmans, or some vague notion of men are upholding it. It’s more like a father figure. Who put rules and expectations in place that needed to be upheld and this fight is a rebellion agai…
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:41 AM
2

Yeah, it’s being stated as fact but there’s nothing to prove that’s the case. The closest thing I saw mentioned in an article was, she was found by ‘Internet sleuths’ and was then bullied. Usually when evidence is presented they state that’s been seen so I’ve got to lean towards self report in this instance.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 12:45 AM
46

They’ve seen profits decline so they’ve got to look at changing the formula. So men start paying out for their services. That’s it. It’s all about monetising their services. They’re targeting men because women message first wasn’t working. There were too many that didn’t know that was the case even though it was part of the marketing. So to try and entice men to sign up. They’ve gone and copied a feature Tinder’s been using for years to start conversations. But here’s the problem. Men still won’…
/r/MensRights10/05/24 07:54 PM
1

They do vote. But after each election media runs stories saying that whoever won was voted in because of women & politicians better pursue fminist policies. That sounds like a circlejerk. Politicians seem to believe the votes of young men don't matter. If it’s on the basis of someone being elected and not being elected they don’t. Politicians don’t need to target men to get elected. Consequently the 3 or 4 biggest parties are anti-male. Because anti-male politicians are being elected?
/r/MensRights10/05/24 07:22 PM
5

This is a dumb post The entire thing is dumb. Stop focusing on pushback against it. it's obvious why you (especially as a woman) would choose the bear. The man could be ANY, and I mean ANY man. And the bear could be any bear. Yeah and the chances are the man will be an upstanding citizen. The whole argument is disingenuous but you’re either being a troll or you are blind to it and you’re completely fine with men being demonised. There are unfortunately a lot of men that will act differently arou…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 06:11 PM
5

The OP's question is why does THIS sub have a bad reputation and you haven't responded to my observations, just changed the subject. What good does that do? Maybe take note of who you’re responding to. The person this was in relation to isn’t the same person you initially responded to. As I foreshadowed in my prior post, I'm being downvoted for asking legitimate, non-inflammatory questions. None (one?) of those downvoters bothered to respond. You’re here in bad faith. you haven't responded to my…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 11:32 PM
5

Change the knife from one hand to the other. Edit: The scars (the ones on her neck and next to her mouth) look like they were caused by having the knife as close as possible to you and stabbing downwards.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 09:13 PM
10

If we’re going in to the realm of speculation then my question would be: Why did she switch hands (during the murder)? so I don’t think it was just a case of “evil woman rages at boyfriend” Awful take. The issue is with the sentence and how domestic violence is gendered. The better argument would have been the multiple cases where the individual was released from psychoactive care and didn’t receive a prison sentences. Edit: Spelling.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 07:23 PM
1

Idk how to quote on phone, seems fiddly but yeah It’s easier to quote on Android than Apple. With Apple you have to copy the full post then add a > symbol to the start of the quote. Yeah, it’s annoying at. Like I don’t get how you say that men should be insulted but then later say it’s a joke? Idk maybe we’re talking past each other, but it’s clearly just a trend and a way for some girls to be edgy. “Yeah I’d pick a bear over a man” no tf you wouldn’t bitch drink your latte. It was silly is in r…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 01:23 PM
4

What are you on about man, you drastically misunderstood some shit. I can’t quote coz I’m on the phone, but lemme give it a shot anyway. Me too 🤷‍♂️ OP is taking his partners response super seriously, so I’m giving advice on how to respond to girls saying they’d choose the bear. How are you supposed to take it? Regardless of what is it, it’s essentially saying men are worse than wild animals. The problem is, if someone says bear, it shouldn’t be wrong to feel insulted by it. Obviously it’s my op…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 12:55 PM
4

Fuck this question annoys me, but not because of feminists, but because how fucking triggered guys get. Why are you doing this? You can be annoyed by it, but everyone else who responds negatively to it is angered by it? There are two ways I see responding to this depending on who’s telling you they would choose a bear. Both hinge around the fact that it’s a fucking hypothetical question you guys are worried about. And a joke and a thought experiment. Are you purposely missing the point? It’s not…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 12:36 PM
2

My impression is when people talk about traditional masculinity, they're talking specifically about 50's era social norms. I’m assuming you mean when conservatives talk about traditional masculinity. That could also apply to the left. Personally, I’ve only ever heard those on the left state x (whoever that maybe, such as conservatives and even men’s rights activists) want to go back to the fifties. Which I can't entirely fault feminism/the left for, because conservatives have pushed for that fra…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 08:06 PM
2

So, you propose they call themselves femcels to detach from the baggage of incels? Then why use a word so similar? I’ve got no idea, sorry. I hope I didn't misinterpret anything, I'm ESL but you've been very clear, I think. Thanks. No worries. It was a cordial conversation.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 05:57 PM
1

See my other reply — you haven’t added anything in your reply and you’re just repeating something I’ve already addressed.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 05:53 PM
2

It basically comes down to chauvinism. Those worst aspects can be applied to men but they can’t be applied to women. It’s how women are viewed within society and how they view themselves. Referring to a woman as an incel is equality but it’s also misogyny. As it’s tying the worst aspects to women. So they’re got to differentiate them from the bad aspects they’re tacked into the term incel. Hope I made sense.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 12:07 PM
17

The last seven paragraphs: Once disrespect becomes the heart of the argument, we begin connecting just about everything – and everyone – to violence. We’ve seen plenty of assertions that violence against women is the end of a continuum that begins with a sexist joke. We’ve seen pleas for men to “have the conversation”, unspecified as that directive may be, for the “good” men to set the “bad” men straight. This delivers a conventional wisdom that this is ultimately a men’s problem, and one that e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 11:42 AM
2

First of all, let's stop pretending that he was arrested over trying to steal a cigarette. No, he is a convicted criminal and he also threatened to beat someone up over a cigarette. That’s the title of the article. Got an issue with it, take it up with the Guardian and if you noticed, I quoted part of the article I wanted to focus on. No-one noticed it so 🤷‍♂️ Being a Traveler, i.e. Gypsy, and a man, this just seals the deal and shows the notoriety of Blair's IPP legacy. And the corner the Guard…
/r/MensRights03/05/24 02:11 AM
11

That quote is an oddity. Originally it was used to dodge a question and now it’s being used as a weapon. These types of phrases are basically chants that don’t convey much in terms of information and require whoever’s interpreting them to interpret any deeper meaning to them. They’re essentially viral shortcuts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 01:57 AM
3

It probably would have been better to humanise them (counter the line about depressed dogs) and focus on the mental health aspect instead of all that. You took all these different things and mushed them together. An incel could simply be someone who hadn’t been successful when it comes to dating or relationships. That’s what it originally meant. But now it could be applied to anyone. As for the stats on women rating men's attractiveness vs how men do with that famous skewed curve where women onl…
/r/MensRights03/05/24 01:34 AM
4

I’m pressing x for doubt on that one. They’re referred to femcels to differentiate them from incels. It’s chauvinism at its finest.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 01:09 AM
1

Again, missed the point. Edit: The point was the type of sentence he received. Also there's still somewhere in the region of 2,800 in prison and 99% of them are male.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:16 PM
1

What? Explain to me why it was wrong to post an article about IPP prisoners?
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:08 PM
1

don't feel to sorry for them. the ones I met were deranged and mentally gone from how long they've been put away and probably would be a danger if released anyway. So whoops a daisy then? The government made a huge mistake in the application of a law and it's wrecked the lies of thousands of men, but hey-oh, now they're 'deranged and mentally gone' so should rot. I know a woman who did 11 years for a 2 year sentence. basically it means you get sentcened for a serious crime that doesn't warrant a…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:08 PM
1

Maybe actually read the frickin' article and take note of the subreddit you're posting in. It's about IPP sentences.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 05:57 PM
1

Wtf is this (reply)?
/r/MensRights02/05/24 05:56 PM
1

Did you miss the point? Why's he still in prison eighteen years later?
/r/MensRights02/05/24 05:55 PM
1

Eighteen years is a bit excessive? Seriously? About this instead, remove the person then look at IPP sentences. There’s still a few thousand in prison and it’s been twelve years since it was scrapped. Edit: Remove the first one. If it's nothing to do with that, then there's no point mentioning it. The Guardian couldn't just straight up state it's because he's a man.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 05:34 PM
8

Nuance is important. Is this concern trolling? Class and poverty are loud examples of systemic injustice that are real and things that we should strive to address -- Sexism, racism and nationalism are also real, and flushing the whole lot of these concepts because their unfairly weaponized against men makes it easy to dismiss us. Posters such as yourself are oddities. Your whole argument is a discussion on how a discussion should take place — how something should be discussed before it can prope…
/r/MensRights01/05/24 07:31 PM
2

I’ve got to ask are you using multiple accounts? Is the previous poster you? You’re both using similar vernacular and syntax.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:26 PM
3

I know some men will lose their minds and downvote me into oblivion because they can’t deal with any view opposing them in this echo chamber Your argument is bad, and you should feel bad. Seriously though, pretty much everything you wrote is either twisted, wrong, and or a strawman you’ve constructed. but I’ll give an example. Bad example. Like every other one.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:24 PM
14

Is that account for real? Just had a quick read through their tweets. There's something off about them. They're too cultivated, too current thing. It's like whoever is writing those tweets is ticking off boxes. Sorry, I can't describe it better. Edit: It’s as if corporate activism was distilled then injected into an individual
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/24 11:53 PM
1

I could have sworn you were UK, sorry. I meant non-governmental — charities
/r/MensRights26/04/24 01:54 AM
1

Who are you being sexist against here? You do know women have political power right, they can vote themselves, and speak to individuals that can and do chance policy? That individuals wishing to be voted into office will and do cater to both individuals and organisations, right? And those organisations can and are involved in the process when those laws are being written, right? And if those individuals and non-governmental organisations got behind a single issue they’d have a lot of political p…
/r/MensRights26/04/24 01:02 AM
26

And here I thought menslib was taking a turn for the better after their gigantic cluster fuck in allowing an AMA with a man who denied that male victims of domestic abuse existed. I thought the problem with that AMA was that the OP wasn’t intersectional enough and is stuck in the past. (Thought it was more) The issue wasn’t say the Duluth model, it was more there’s trans people who don’t fit within that model and they’ve been victims of domestic abuse They even got called out on blanket deleting…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/24 08:56 PM
37

Do they have that level of self-awareness? For them to know that, wouldn’t they have to at least partially understand why that’d make feminism look bad? It’s probably more of trimming or marginalising the discussions. So they can self-contain it better so the user base can’t wonder off too far. The odd thing though, r/menslib is a bit like Marmite to subreddits like r/askfeminists or r/feminism. At least the posts I’ve read, when that subreddit is brought up there’s a mixed response. When it’s r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/24 08:33 PM
22

Thought I'd look up AWDTSG on Google to see if it's still active. Noticed the city I live in appeared in the suggestions. We have a network of over 150 groups with a total of roughly 3 million members, and we’re completely run by a small team of volunteers. Try to keep in mind that we have jobs and lives outside of this, and that we can’t always be available. Please be patient with the admins and moderators. Will these groups be receiving a similar reaction? PS when I was looking up the group me…
/r/MensRights22/04/24 07:13 PM
1

I can only think of the one and she got eight years. Had to accuse numerous men before they took action.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 08:27 PM
41

Maybe someone should start posting not all bears. Since it’s a few species of bears that can and will attack humans on sight. Also they’re in for a shock if they run into a grizzly. Since that particular species — along with polar bears — are pretty vicious. The corpse won’t be fully clothed but the individual body parts might be. Probably the best course of action is to ignore it and unfriend anyone who mentions/quotes it.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 08:28 PM
3

It’s a self-reinforcing structure. A feedback loop/virtuous cycle. Unless you live jumped to something else patriarchy is a constant. It’s a simple framework. It’s the social norms that change the factors imho. What you are outlined seems to be inline with civil liberties and individual freedoms of the day. And you can blame someone for something they aren’t responsible for or not a victim of. It doesn’t make sense to me to consider people a victim of a paradigm, because it takes their own will …
/r/MensRights16/04/24 10:09 PM
0

More to the point, did that type of patriarchy exist? Patriarchy exists but it really comes down to what it's being defined as. It's a bit like online dictionaries changing definitions for words when it suits. It's probably rooted in tribalism and shame. That's putting the good against the bad. If you don't want to be defined as having bad beliefs or attributes, then it's better to align yourself with good. Also, it harms men, is element of in-group bias. If it was framed as helping one demograp…
/r/MensRights16/04/24 12:15 AM
4

Let’s say that “The Patriarchy” is a systemic structure that guides social norms and practices. Disagree. If social norms define what a patriarchy is then it can't be a parent object (to social norms). The only way I can make it make sense if it's purely expectations or focused on roles, with social norms defining what those expectations and roles are. If that's the case, then that existed prior to settled agriculture and potentially all the way back to primates. Individuals acting as change age…
/r/MensRights15/04/24 11:47 PM
1

You responded to yourself
/r/MensRights15/04/24 10:58 PM
9

Probably trying to bait someone into posting some spicy material they can screenshot
/r/MensRights13/04/24 11:00 PM
7

Did you use AI to write that? It’s somewhat disjointed, filled with buzzwords and current talking points.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/24 12:55 AM
2

I buy all my 'mens' grooming products as unscented. I’ve never understood why most outlets sell men’s grooming products that have a specific scent to them. Think one is just defined as sports and the other is Lynx/Axe-esk. You can go to pretty much any (relevant) shop in the UK and find them.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 12:34 AM
2

It would probably be better to roll back a bit and focus on the individual that posted that. The purpose of this is to further exacerbate the situation and demotivate men. Act on behalf of a whole demographic, place yourself at the center then pretend you’re being asked to do something. No-one specifically asked the men-haters to do anything. They should sit down and shut the absolute heck up. “Men discussed loneliness with other people. Those other people included men.” It’s almost as if they c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/24 11:52 PM
12

You weren’t questioning anything. You were being downright misandristic as you are being right here.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 12:53 AM
13

Did you escape from 2x? Please stick to posting your misandry there.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 12:25 AM
1

Can’t comment on the first part. Agree with the last part. Community doesn’t seem right though. I suppose that comes down to websites you visited or post on. So there can be some sense of community but for the most part it seems it’s a nothingness that erodes self-identity. PS no offence, didn’t know if I should reply due to your avatar.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:27 PM
48

The movement came to prominence in 2014, when 22-year-old Elliot Rodger killed six people and injured fourteen others at the University of California, Santa Barbara after becoming radicalised by the incel movement. Retconning history? The press referred to him as a misogynist at the time and not as an incel. That didn’t come in to general usage until much later. Edit: Men’s rights was a scape goat for years for his supposed radicalisation. The article is too chauvinistic for me. It fits right in…
/r/MensRights26/03/24 07:34 PM
5

I posted it mainly because of these two articles: https://theguardian.com/society/2023/mar/08/covid-effect-mental-health-study-mcgill-university https://theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/mar/10/pandemic-mental-health-covid-lockdown I don't understand how now everyone is "omg COVID lockdowns" when boys that were bullied, lower social class, etc Not having a friend group.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 07:22 PM
2

Seems like a better writeup: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-68636316 Same parent company: https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/fantasist-jailed-eight-years-damaging-28868767 ​ "The Crown submits that making allegations of a sexual nature is such a serious matter, given the damage to someone's reputation and family life, that, if those allegations are false, the repercussions and consequences are profound." But.. But fewer people coming forward... "The Crown submits th…
/r/MensRights24/03/24 12:58 PM
11

The answers have been readily available this entire time. You are free to put forth an actual contest. UK law — section 1 of the Sexual Offences act 2003 defines rape as penetrative. Also to add there was a government response to a petition to redefine rape back in 2016 (as it received over 20k signatures): In the consultation there was a considerable amount of agreement that rape should remain an offence of penile penetration, but that the definition be extended to include penile penetration of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/24 10:06 PM
2

You mean like you right here?
/r/MensRights19/03/24 02:28 PM
3

Hate speech rules: https://www.newsweek.com/reddit-bans-men-going-their-own-way-forums-violating-hate-speech-rules-1616379 This may have been partly to blame: https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/02/07/349052/the-manosphere-is-getting-more-toxic-as-angry-men-join-the-incels/ That’s a dumpster fire of a read.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 10:09 PM
14

Am dude. This happens WAY WAY more often with men so I don't know what the point is of making this a big deal. This is a Wendy’s sir. Seriously though this is a single post. It isn’t deep. Someone posted a link to an article, about familicide, which you countered. We need to fix our house from within before we can call other people out for the same shit. Which is what? What would your advice be? Edit: Downvoted for being right always tastes so delectable. Declaring yourself the winner of your ow…
/r/MensRights18/03/24 08:08 PM
3

How do I get out of this? How do I wade through the sea for a woman who actually truly loves me despite my flaws? That’s almost Philosophical. Probably needs rephrasing. Probably the biggest indicator could be how they view relationships. If they’re competitive or seen as some type of battlefield. Also how feminist or gynocentric they are. That’d revolve around the belief in a patriarchy or the need for restitution for supposed past bad deeds by men. You probably already know this. If you’re a c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/24 12:36 AM
5

I understand what you mean but there's no evidence to suggest that calling it InSing(involuntarily single) or something would be anymore well received since the idea of a male loneliness epidemic has been relentlessly mocked with the same rhetoric used to dismiss cels' even though loneliness is commonly understood to mean despair due to a lack of romantic relationships. That’s pretty much spot on. Like how the self-descriptor has been warped by misogynists and it’s just all about hating women. A…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 11:55 PM
10

Excuse the points if they’ve been adequately covered. Original comment: I'm honestly not convinced of the premise or that incorporating it into men's advocacy is productive. It should be a huge part. It falls under how men are seen or perceived. If you meant in terms of how can derived into a point and defended, that’s the issue with other issues men face. Supporting arguments for it being a serious issue are too often based on cherry-picking unrepresentative data from dating websites or other d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 11:45 PM
5

Wouldn’t the solution then be focus on those particular issues. The problem here is if that didn’t happen would the (O)OOP even mention them? Is this a whatsboutism?
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/24 02:09 AM
12

Just because men worked in mines doesn’t mean as a society it’s ok to view women as property. You’ve provided nothing of substance. Your whole argument boils down to: Patriarchy ☕️ Also other than you, no one has made that argument. And you switched the goal posts. I have provided substance you just aren’t responding to any of it. Where? I looked through your replies. I’m not reading your shitty book. Everything else you said was the equivalent of “nuh uh” So bad faith arguments.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 12:54 AM
14

Could you please post photos of women working the mines? Edit: You’ve provided nothing of substance. Your freakin’ opinion is just your opinion.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 12:37 AM
13

Define patriarchy. Edit: "what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."
/r/MensRights12/03/24 12:34 AM
15

Women that legitimately want to tear men down aren’t upholding feminism by definition whether or not they claim to be one. That’s a no Scotsman fallacy. If you want resources and support going to issues that disproportionately affect each gender then you are supporting feminism. I think you’ll find feminism — by your own definition — is an equality movement for women and girls. It isn’t one for men and boys. The word you’re looking for is egalitarianism. Just being a man? What oppression have me…
/r/MensRights12/03/24 12:30 AM
6

Really depends if you meant because the attempt was successful or because the means were brutal. I took it as the latter. That’s wrong as methods don’t differ much.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 12:18 AM
19

A HUGE reason being that men are NOT SEEKING EMOTIONAL HELP. WHICH IS A RESULT OF A PATRIARCHAL MESSAGING THAT EQUATES VULNERABILITY TO WEAKNESS AND UNMANLINESS. LOUD NOISES. Why are you shouting talking points that are factually incorrect? Would you define patriarchy?
/r/MensRights12/03/24 12:15 AM
14

That is more a problem with lethal means then gender. You’re just repeating a overly used talking point. Get new material.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 12:07 AM
4

There’s something I don’t get here. Before Thursday's raids, investigators had been working for a long time to identify alleged perpetrators hiding behind the anonymity offered by the internet. … In preparation for the raids, authorities scoured the internet for posts that potentially broke anti-misogyny laws and attempted to identify the authors. The names of the suspects will then be forwarded to the public prosecutor’s offices in the states where they live in order to decide whether to procee…
/r/MensRights11/03/24 01:24 AM
17

You know I can read the rest of your posts, right?
/r/MensRights03/03/24 12:31 AM
16

Your argument boils down to framing it as men as a whole then focusing on a small percentage of them. Like wow, get a new script.
/r/MensRights02/03/24 11:40 PM
1

I agree with unity between the sexes. That’s probably the main dividing factor. It’s become somewhat of a diluted Robot Council. Is OOP calling for a gender war There’s one already going on. The OOP is being combative.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/03/24 09:26 PM
2

Not really a point but ok 👍
/r/MensRights01/03/24 08:05 PM
4

I meant the comments Misandry is bad because it's blaming all men for being oppressive... and I tied it into how being racist to white people because you perceive them to be oppressors is also bad. Yes but also no. It’s the hatred of men. But everyone in the comment section acting weird. You including yourself in that? PS I’m pretty sure you’re wrong about Asians being favoured in academia
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/24 03:20 AM
6

Wtaf is this
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/24 03:13 AM
3

Hello Hyde, where’s Jekyll?
/r/MensRights29/02/24 10:09 PM
2

If the vast-majority of the life expectancy gap it isn’t due to biologically then what is it? Usually bad habits are used as excuses. If you have a point other than semantics, what is it?
/r/MensRights29/02/24 10:06 PM
1

Is there any truth to this? I’m pretty sure I heard a similar story some time back. PS just looked it up. If it’s the same one it’s from five years ago. I’m pretty sure there was a post about it going around last year.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/02/24 09:55 PM
1

I read that thanks. That came afterwards. I’m going back to your original intent with that line.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/02/24 05:37 PM
1

If you doubt it, you'll no doubt understand why collecting the statistics is the only way to confirm what you suppose. Clarify this point. Did what you think I was supposing?
/r/EverydayMisandry28/02/24 05:30 PM
1

I’m not supposing anything. I doubt that will have any affect on policy decisions.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/02/24 05:23 PM
6

This in turn has knock on effects on policy decisions that involve use of these statistics. Press x for doubt.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/02/24 08:41 PM
3

These types of things demotivate me. I don’t have any friends. I’m just trying to keep it together and when I listen to these types of arguments I just don’t want to be part of any of it. It’s similar to the “Who goes there?” type of paranoia. Instead of who’s the alien, it’s who’s the potential rapist.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/24 09:24 PM
21

OP you need to post more context. The percentages you posted are not a recent thing. The 60% figure may be from as far back as 60 years ago. Men making up 75% of suicides isn’t a new development. Also it’s as high as 80%. I don’t recall if that was Northern Ireland or Wales. Not sure if it’s connected. There was a number of articles about five years ago about how bad that figure is. Not sure if some were calling for an enquiry in to the causes but it was definitely to raise attention to it.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 11:39 AM
7

You’d have to look at if there are any romance movies being made today and what the storylines are comprised of. If that movie was remade today the lead could be called a pickme and if it was gender swapped, it could be referred to as a tutorial in stalking and creepy behaviour. There’s nothing to win here. There’s no arguments to be won in relation to this movie. Potentially there’s one to be made how bad things have gotten and how the behaviour in this movie is problematic.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/02/24 11:19 AM
4

The replies themselves? My main one would be the usage of patriarchy and how it’s currently defined. You’ll have to excuse me, I’m not a feminist and I’m viewing this as pro-feminist? Sorry, I think I need some air. I’ve gone through the replies and listed them based on agree or disagree. Can give a better response if you want a breakdown for my reasoning for a specific reply. They’d probably fall under patriarchy, expectations, or false framing/reasoning. Footnote: OP is zero then they go in nu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/24 08:59 PM
4

I’ve been mulling over how to respond to this for a bit. I’ve read through those responses, I don’t get the titles in relation to the content and I can’t say I agree with most I’ve read so far. PS to be fair, there was one reply I agreed with (not sure which one it was) and I agreed with parts of the one above ‘Brit’ but it veered off. I’m not sure that’s achievable — as that’d be potentially from someone who has a low opinion of masculinity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/24 08:22 PM
3

Well, feminism was net positive for the humanity. It gave women equal rights - they can work, educate, own property, vote, have equal citizenship etc. You’re confusing the framework with the people who granted those. I'm adamantly opposed to patriarchy and misogyny. Define patriarchy? Having said that, I understand that some feminists can be excessively devoted to this cause and they can misinterpret any post pertaining to men's issues as "misogyny" and "derailing". That’s almost religious. For …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/24 09:07 AM
2

I think that’s Phil Mitchell in the video. It got some attention a few months back. The amount of signatures has gone up by about double since I last checked it.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 01:16 AM
5

And for your personal information, if a woman ever assaults me, I get a conviction regardless of wether I pushed her away or broke her arm, so I beat her within an inch of her life to make it count!!! Boy, that escalated quickly. I mean, that really got out of hand fast.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 08:45 PM
23

Why is it acceptable to view men in such bad terms? You've invoked "Well, we don't know who the bad men are, so we'll treat every man as the bad ones." It's comical you posting that on this particular post. Understanding this can help you to make it less scary for them, which will give you much better chances. Like how? Smiling then saying, "Look I know you don't know who the bad guys are, but I'm really nice. I won't murder you or anything. Pinky promise!" Big smile which will give you much bet…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:46 AM
1

Re-read it
/r/MensRights11/02/24 12:36 AM
1

Your whole reply Generalizations aren’t okay when it comes to men. Why would you think that? Previous poster meant it's seen as being ok to generalise men.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 12:21 AM
2

Hold up, did you watch the video? Here's an alternative link: https://youtu.be/iznyvjz3wa8
/r/MensRights10/02/24 06:45 PM
2

They're seen as being ok -- don't strawman
/r/MensRights10/02/24 06:17 PM
3

Didn't have any issues. It's a segment on an Australian morning show called Today. It's about how lazy Australian men are when it comes to dating. Closest alternative I could find was a Daily Mail article: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-12882929/Single-dating-culture-Australia-trend-TikTok.html Other articles I found: https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/why-women-lose-the-dating-game-20120421-1xdn0.html https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/02/first-edition-gen-z-men-women-politica…
/r/MensRights10/02/24 06:07 PM
10

There is a reason behind why OOPs wife made the go bag and why there are commenters agreeing with that. (Snip) … A left wing response to that is wanting to help alleviate that fear in some way, not dismiss it. Actually the basis of the commenters responses were most likely how they perceive men. It isn’t to alleviate any fear that women may hold. “You can’t just leave a fallacy lying about. Someone’s likely to trip over it and get injured.” Edit: Two can moralise too: “A left-wing response shoul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/24 12:33 AM
9

If you will, expand on this. Why do you think the men’s rights movement started around the time of women’s sexual revolution? Edit: I’m not even sure that’s grammatically correct
/r/MensRights08/02/24 12:14 AM
26

This seems to be a copy pasta. The OP should’ve put more effort in. There’s a few sections they didn’t properly update. ”I was one formal complaint from getting her fired” Edit: I suppose it could be considered satire. As it’s over the top.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 11:38 PM
2

The suggestions are part way there: Parents who failed to pay child maintenance should face curfews, driving bans and passport restrictions, an MP has said. Annoyingly nothing has been published and the BBC hasn’t contacted them to find out the status: During the House of Commons debate, Ms Coffey, who represents Suffolk Costal, alluded to a July 2022 consultation about improving enforcement powers through curfew orders. … Although the consultation closed in August of the same year, the governme…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 11:30 PM
5

“There was a collective raising awareness of the violence that women and girls experienced in certain parts of their lives. And the fact that that was being perpetrated by men, and the fact that some of the norms in our society either excused that violence as being just a joke, or part of flirting, or no big deal. “That message was often heard by many rightwing commentators, but also by young people in schools, as, ‘people think that all men do this’ – rather than, ‘these things are happening, a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/24 02:27 AM
1

There’s a problem though — is that self-report or did the author attend one of these events? The whole article is pointless. It’s a cross between an advert and a tick box exercise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/24 02:09 AM
2

If the notion is white people are superior, then why penalize non-whites for performing white coded things? It’s probably got roots in slavery. It seems to go back that far. Think it used to be referred to as selling out to fit into the white man’s world. It’s changing yourself to fit in to it or conforming to certain rules to operate within it. If it’s rooted in slavery then it’s conforming to rules set by a dominant group. Look up American Indian boarding schools. Think there’s a book entitled…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/24 01:30 AM
2

Case in point: Julie Bindel. Outside of Dworkin you probably couldn’t pick a more deluded, conceited, or inconsistent person. it’s treated like this taboo to call out ‘cos it makes lesbians look bad or something, not realising that this shit regularly smears their image in the mainstream press. Whether or not they’re self-aware of it, that can be an effective tool or method to utilise. They don’t care about their self-image and if that question came up it’d probably be blamed on a phantom, the p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/24 12:39 AM
3

In her 2020 essay Le Génie lesbien (The Lesbian Genius) Coffin urges women to eradicate men from their lives. She says she considered titling the essay ‘misandre’ (man-hater) and claims misandry to be integral part of her feminism. After the first round of the 2022 French Presidential Election, Alice Coffin denounced "political mediocrity" within the Green Party, and voiced the opinion that their candidate Yannick Jadot "had screwed up". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Coffin A new book, “Le…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/24 06:13 PM
1

Why the strawman?
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:59 PM
6

Hey, nice deflect. Focus on a singular point and ignore the rest. Also, they are garnished.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 01:58 AM
3

I agree about social media. You can find RAGING misogyny in the incel and manosphere, and RAGING Misandry on feminist sites. That’s a bit headache inducing. Manoaphere is a loose term. Found this definition on Wikipedia: The manosphere is a diverse collection of websites, blogs, and online forums promoting masculinity, misogyny, and opposition to feminism. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manosphere I don’t agree with the Wikipedia entry nor this part that’s slightly further down: Acceptance of t…
/r/MensRights28/01/24 01:55 AM
6

He wouldn’t be in debt or prison if he was supporting his kids…. Get it? You know you can get in debt when the payments are too high? When there’s a deficit and there’s too many outgoing payments. Hey, why don’t you tell us how child support payments are garnished from the father’s salary?
/r/MensRights28/01/24 12:29 AM
2

It took a few minutes for it to click. It’s similar to their about page. Edit: The definition is off. It should be to foster or create interest. It’s essentially pretending to be progressive to impress someone then hoping that the other person would or will sleep with that ‘progressive’ person.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/01/24 10:24 PM
3

The OP didn’t provide any because they’re myths from years ago.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 01:58 AM
2

Really depends what you mean and the source for this information. The OP could mean the health gap or more men dropping out of society. It’s a topic that’s repeated with glee and used to reduce empathy whenever the male health gap is brought up. As far as I thought the health gap was closing. Not sure what the cause of that was though.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 01:52 AM
6

OP is probably a troll. Look at their comments. Pretty sure some of them are Red Pill-ish
/r/MensRights26/01/24 05:48 PM
9

What’s with the fallacy? Edit: It’s a comparison
/r/MensRights26/01/24 12:18 AM
1

Check the ONS references. Women’s Aid usually borks them and links to statistics that don’t match with their claims.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 11:29 PM
51

The judge went against the sentencing guidelines. Ignored the effect it’s had on the victim and the perpetrators previous offences. I’m on mobile and for some reason the screen keeps randomly scrolling to different sections: https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/magistrates-court/item/inflicting-grievous-bodily-harm-unlawful-wounding-racially-or-religiously-aggravated-gbh-unlawful-wounding/
/r/MensRights24/01/24 12:33 AM
2

On re-reading, yes, agreed. The slight change in perspective changed how I read it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 11:56 PM
3

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49677983 Something I noticed: It involves the partial or total removal of the female external genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons. In the last three months, almost 1,000 women and girls were identified as having been affected by FGM. This is disingenuous. It’s a bit of a moot point. They’re hoping you’ll tie the two points and associate type 1 FGM with the stats. The people they’ve identified. Likewise activists in Australia …
/r/MensRights23/01/24 11:53 PM
1

I'm sure lots of people had the shared experience of grief caused by women fearing them unjustly, but I'm curious if it really made any deluded in the same way it did me. You mean the look of fear? I get that from both men and women. But the funny thing is, I now realize that my personality is actually the complete opposite of what I thought it was. And it partially took my now-girlfriend to help me realize it. When I read this post earlier the thought I had was for this part was it probably was…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 09:19 PM
2

Are you seriously brigading?
/r/MensRights23/01/24 06:00 PM
54

So they must be feminist spies. They’re male feminists. If you read the info on the subreddit you might have noticed it states men’s issues have to be viewed through a feminist lens. Your only purpose here seems to be bait.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 12:25 AM
1

It’s probably someone either flexing their authority and abusing the rules. Or someone doesn’t like you so they’re nitpicking and trying to find the slightest regression. PS thought I was having déjà vu.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 12:32 AM
4

But who’s going to make videos about what type of drinks and food tech companies serve in their cafeterias?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 07:57 PM
1

Thanks, had no idea why the previous poster mentioned Child Protective Services
/r/MensRights19/01/24 12:35 PM
131

It’s much worse than that. The accuser made numerous insane claims but when the footage was viewed by someone at CPS they pushed ahead with the case. He’d have to be Flash or Superman to do the things she claimed.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 12:39 AM
2

How about you just stick to r/boysarequirky 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights18/01/24 11:59 PM
16

OP do you read the articles prior to posting them?
/r/MensRights18/01/24 11:48 PM
8

The HPV vaccine has been offered to all girls in school year 8 since September 2008. From September 2019, the vaccine has also been offered to year 8 boys. This is because the evidence is clear that the HPV vaccine helps protect both boys and girls from HPV-related cancers. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hpv-vaccine-vaccination-guide-leaflet/information-on-the-hpv-vaccination-from-september-2023#:~:text=The%20HPV%20vaccine%20has%20been,offered%20to%20year%208%20boys.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 12:08 AM
1

They’re usually referred to as incels
/r/MensRights17/01/24 12:16 AM
1

I completely missed that. It’s a bit, not sure, Orwellian? I read it originally as they need sympathy and not scorn for issues with their love lives. But that’s actually written is they’ve square and they’ve got to fit in the circle hole. They’ve got to be taught not to be the things they say they are. Got a bit of a headache coming on so excuse the rambling.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 08:00 PM
1

A few years ago I might have agreed with you. By definition it does. Those other things were tacked on. Basically I mean treat an incel as someone who’s unlucky when it comes to dating, relationships, and sex. And treat chauvinists and misogynists as chauvinists and misogynists. If you’re told you’re a nasty person because you’re part of a group or subculture, as you put it, or even because you’re definitionally an incel that could effect your mental image of yourself and your mental health. It …
/r/MensRights16/01/24 07:51 PM
3

What about the change of atmosphere? You must have noticed how bad dating has become and how there’s a growing division between the sexes? And there’s plenty of guys who aren’t ugly but identify as incels I don’t understand why identify as something has become more common place. It’s a bit reductive. You either are or aren’t. There’s no need to state you identify as something. Going back, it really depends how the word is being used: Is it the original definition or something else? And why would…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 01:06 AM
3

The stereotype of an incel is an ugly, either fat or nothing but skin and bones, guy who can’t get a girl because of how he looks It’s purposely disparaging. All those things were tacked on to divert the issue from it being external elements to internal ones. “It isn’t the game that’s the problem it’s angry men who need a wash.” Two infamous incels, Elliot Rodger and Malik Sanchez, were arguably handsome or at least not ugly. They’re in the tiny minority. Why give them any focus? Most incels are…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 12:05 AM
5

Men who identify as incels have "fundamental thinking errors" about what women want, research shows. A study at Swansea University found incels - or involuntary celibates - overestimated physical attractiveness and finances, while underestimating kindness, humour and loyalty. The study's co-author Andrew Thomas said "thinking errors" could "lead us down some quite troubling paths". … It found "thinking errors" which lead to an increasing likelihood of aligning with problematic ideologies and tha…
/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:35 PM
1

Thought this might be an interest to some here. Found it whilst trying to find some information. One of the main drivers of homelessness in New York City is domestic violence. (#447) A survivor of domestic violence may need a safe place to stay after fleeing an abusive relationship and the housing shared with the abuser. (#448) Furthermore, a survivor may lack the economic resources to maintain their own housing after ending an abusive relationship (#449). Temporarily doubling up with extended f…
/r/MensRights15/01/24 07:07 PM
1

I’ll cut it down as short as possible for you: You don’t have any issues with the wording in the petition? You focused on the wrong aspect, deary Edit: I’ll try to make the point as short as possible. My issue is how they’re treated. As potential threats. Something to be feared. For whatever reasons they’re homeless and all you can see is a monster. You know what the better position would be: If you don’t think the location is suitable, be part of the solution, contact them directly, and suggest…
/r/MensRights15/01/24 01:09 AM
1

In response one of your earlier replies: I occasionally go out shopping in the city centre on the evening after most shops have closed. I know it’s anecdotal. Over the past few years it seems the homeless is increasing. Can’t say I’ve had any trouble or seen or heard anything. Usually they’re either passed out or sleeping based on their positioning. There’s one main beggar called Needles. Have heard of him but haven’t seen him in person. He used to threaten people with needles hence the nickname…
/r/MensRights15/01/24 12:53 AM
1

Whoever posted it felt the need to add additional points. The framework could be applied to any built up area they try to build a homeless shelter in. If the petition gains ground politically, you’ll find the project likely gets abandoned. It’s much easier to be against it than to be part of trying to provide shelter to explicitly for men. Even if it’s an alternative location which would fit petitioners criteria.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 12:38 AM
3

I agree with you. But I never see the same energy.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 12:10 AM
1

Because you keep omitting it and keep focusing on these homeless men might have been put on the sex registers list for peeing in the street. If you scroll back up you might notice I wrote I’m not buying that. And how does your point prove that the shelter should be built at its current location? I haven’t stated either way. My issue is with the wording of the petition. The locations of the firehouse and the ambulance entrance are irrelevant. It's why I didn't put it in. So why did you mention it…
/r/MensRights15/01/24 12:02 AM
4

You really don’t have an issue with any of the language used? You can seriously fuck off with the ‘all men’ thing. It has nothing to do with that.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:54 PM
4

The proposed location also happens to be literally two doors away from FDNY Engine 6, as well as less than 500 ft from the ambulance entrance to the emergency room at NYPH. The coexistence of potentially mentally ill single men and emergency workers at such a short distance may be dangerous for both. This. Stop being vague. If there is something meaningful to show that current location is valid, prove it. Oh wow, you’re doing the thing you’re accusing me of. Your original reply was they can’t st…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:46 PM
2

That means, a homeless man that was caught taking a piss, because he doesn't have a home, will get an indecent exposure charge. Yes I know that could happen but I’m not buying it. You missed out the other reasons. The other nearby locations.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:34 PM
9

Even if its only 1% of them are mentally unstable, that's 2 of them. Wow. It’s like you’ve never been in a city centre before. This petition just happens to have been started by a person with a female name. There is a reason OP cropped that photo and didn't include the entire image. You really went there? Out of issues you saw in the screenshot that was one of them? Oh no, the person who posted the petition is a woman and it’s been posted to the r/mensrights subreddit what will anyone do about i…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:13 PM
16

I wish I hadn’t scrolled down. Read it after I posted the link.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:09 PM
20

So if you open the petition, they are not petitioning against the shelter. They are petitioning against the location. For the reasons that you all know are valid. Please state these reasons and please make them clear. Your own words. I’ve read the petition before you try to deflect. They’re homeless. Not potential violent, emergency-worker-phobic, child molesting, rapists. And the worst thing of all you state the reasons are valid. I wish I could downvote you twice. PS did you post the petition?…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:07 PM
61

Link: https://www.change.org/p/oppose-the-single-men-shelter-proposal-at-41-beekman-street I originally thought this was a old petition from some years ago. It’s a new one from eleven days ago.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 10:58 PM
31

Depends which country or if in general? I know the UK CPS had a consultation maybe back in 2022 to do with deception as to gender. Think that was in connection to a hook up. One pretended to be the opposite sex and wore a diving suit. Was pretty sure that had happened previously.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 06:13 PM
2

Could someone explain the grifting aspect? I thought a grifter would want to placate not divide their audience. There’s been a few cases where Roma purposely divided her audience (the Kyle and her friend being harassed videos). That’s going back a few years though. I suppose that could drive engagement. The end goal is more views and subs. There is something that hasn’t been mentioned. Why does Roma have a different Instagram account?
/r/MensRights14/01/24 12:55 PM
1

Homelessness is similar - about 75% male. How much of a definition game is going there? In the UK it’s closer to 80%. If you exclude those not sleeping rough then it’s somewhere closer to 85-90%. If you wouldn’t need to look much further than that alone for reasonably solid proof society in general cares more about then plight of the average woman than the average man. Probably most of not all western countries are gynocentric. There’s no middle ground between gynocentric and androcentric.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 01:05 AM
2

The bigger question should be what are these being recorded as — when the cases are heard in court and when they’re sent to prison. As some thirty years ago the percentage of non-criminal prisoners decreased substantially in the prison reception figures. Prior to then they made up about 50% of the UK male prison population. Then in about 1993-1994 there was a reform and the amount decreased to maybe about 1%. But there’s an oddity in the figures. If they made up about 50% of the male prison popu…
/r/MensRights13/01/24 01:48 AM
1

It’s possible. There’s an on going case. I don’t know many details. Just that the police have interviewed two people under caution and one requested immunity but that was denied. It’s slightly worse than that as he — Gareth Jenkins, the latter person mentioned above, — was a expert in a number of trials brought against individuals accused of fraud. So it’s possible he could be charged with perjury.
/r/MensRights13/01/24 01:31 AM
23

You could lose ground doing that. Do it as sarcastically as possible. As if their absence means nothing. Edit: It's a mind game. They're expecting a certain reaction from it.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 01:00 AM
8

Flip it around: It’s purposefully being abrasive towards your partner. Hold on, isn’t that a form of coercive control?
/r/MensRights11/01/24 12:21 AM
4

Eltahawy wants men to become “accomplices, not allies”, to feminism. Accomplices is a strange word to in the pursuit of equality. A possible Freudian slip? “Men can disrupt other men who are being misogynistic, homophobic or sexually abusive,” she said, What’s the punk equivalent of a feminist? A radical? A extremist? That’s the gist I got from reading that article. If I’m not sure she’s spoken a man outside her ideological bubble. It doesn’t typically work like that. Men are more likely to list…
/r/MensRights11/01/24 12:15 AM
92

Shortest response to this: K; bye.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 10:51 PM
36

S1 of the Sexual Offences act 1992: It is a criminal offence to publish or broadcast any matter that is likely to identify the alleged victim. This automatic restriction will apply during the alleged victim's lifetime, unless otherwise directed by this court or the Crown Court.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 12:27 AM
3

That’s a bit of a tangent.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 08:37 PM
1

How would you feel if you hadn’t eaten breakfast?
/r/MensRights01/01/24 07:42 PM
31

Did he at least ask the question where do the Ken’s live?
/r/MensRights01/01/24 02:10 PM
1

You’re funny. You flip between two positions. One that gets you upvotes and the other gets you downvotes.
/r/MensRights01/01/24 01:24 AM
3

One day old account. You’re this subreddits troll Got any new tactics?
/r/MensRights01/01/24 12:47 AM
2

Oligarchy. Maybe ask the OP about those. Thinks they’re really patriarchies instead
/r/MensRights31/12/23 01:08 AM
1

I’ve found a few articles. It seems the assaulter vanished from the airport, the police couldn’t find her, and two people who were assaulted — including the husband — wouldn’t cooperative with the police https://eu.usatoday.com/story/travel/airline-news/2019/07/24/wife-hits-husband-laptop-during-argument-american-airlines-plane-miami/1821715001/ Edit: Also the laptop was reportedly his
/r/MensRights27/12/23 09:00 PM
2

Parties. She assaulted two people. One worked for the airline.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 07:45 PM
7

You will need to edit each of the links. The hyphen is being added to the urls
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/23 07:33 PM
26

Because people in society generally try not to punch down. They punch down all the time. She is setting an example for other women that women are action-oriented in an industry still dominated by men (at least at the top). You mean politics? It’s nothing more than a throwaway line to bolster support. Who else posted something similar to that? It’s been clipped so nothing can be inferred. Personally I think it’s meant in a general sense and it’s implying that women in reality build the world and …
/r/MensRights25/12/23 01:59 PM
4

That’s from eleven years ago. Got anything more recent?
/r/MensRights06/12/23 05:29 PM
2

Spanfeller said the company made the "difficult decision to suspend" Jezebel, after the team failed to sell it. Deputy editorial director Lea Goldman led the sales process, as Axios previously reported. Spanfeller said she spoke with more than two dozen potential buyers. Did anyone offer them a crisp and pickle sandwich? If pushed, I probably could take that up to a chippy paprika cheese royale (grill the chips then shallow fry them, then sprinkle the chips with salt and paprika) "Few decisions …
/r/MensRights09/11/23 11:06 PM
5

With Amy Winehouse busting open a can of whupass on her husband last week I remember the press covering the story. Think they framed it as reciprocal. They pointed out scratches he had on his face and white powder under her nose
/r/MensRights09/11/23 10:33 PM
6

Toxic femininity, do better
/r/MensRights04/11/23 10:38 AM
1

A North Dakota man who police say was fatally poisoned with anti-freeze by his girlfriend over a $30 million inheritance was not going to get any money as he was the victim of an online scam, his son says. Ina Thea Kenoyer, 47, murdered Steven Edward Riley Jr, 51, by feeding him poison on September 3, the day he had met with a lawyer to collect the whopping sum, police records state. 'It was a scam,' Riley's son, Ryan, told The New York Post in a new interview. 'He was convinced he had inherited…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 12:52 AM
2

Much. Head hurts. Wow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/23 11:51 PM
9

What… Errr… Le sigh… No idea what to make of this. It reads like an advert made by ChatGPT. I really don’t get the bit about two ‘pill communities’ and making an argument about a singular point they allegedly share PS didn’t you post this over on r/mensrights a while back? I vaguely remember reading it PSS if you don’t find anything or anyone on here you can related to don’t find some other subreddit and repost this monstrosity. You’re not going to relate to anyone with this wall of text. “Volun…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/23 11:50 PM
2

It’s being reminded no one really knows what you like or what your hobbies are and with each coming year the disappointment just increases
/r/MensRights28/10/23 11:21 PM
1

Neither of us are here to help the other to understand the other’s point of view — you know it. So stop wasting time
/r/MensRights24/10/23 12:56 AM
4

Representation should be based on representation within that country, county, area, or even institution It shouldn’t be based on another country. Stop it with the whataboutism
/r/MensRights24/10/23 12:46 AM
1

No. Go re-read it or jog on. Your choice
/r/MensRights24/10/23 12:41 AM
1

What about respecting different subreddits? You’ve tacked on multiple qualifiers. It’s a list of individual things. They’re not all the same and are of varying degrees Also you missed out intent, perception, and actuality. Putting aside actuality, could be looking in a direction and someone else could perceive it as staring. You frame it as it happened because someone claimed it happened.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 12:37 AM
9

Why did you feel the need to add so many qualifiers? If it’s similar to a post over there I’ve read — from about five months ago — you’ve sugar coated it. They don’t like the men’s rights movement or men’s rights advocates — they frame it as a hate group. As for men’s liberation. That probably depends if you mean the subreddit or men’s liberation in general. If it’s the former, it really depends who you ask. It’s seen as somewhat extreme, lacking in oversight, and being infiltrated by whatever h…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 12:08 AM
1

I didn’t think along of those lines. It’s probably based on dosage and info from speaking to friends and family. If there was anything to indicate it was a suicide. It’s a bit like someone falling off a building. Over here initially it’s defined as an accident
/r/MensRights21/10/23 03:45 PM
1

The point is the separation between the two. Technically suicide by drug overdose is an overdose, right? So how does a drug overdose get defined as a suicide?
/r/MensRights21/10/23 02:12 PM
13

I thought the article was pretty good until it got to this part: And according to Moran, that's why men such as social media influencer Andrew Tate and psychologist Jordan Peterson have become so popular: because they're willing to talk about the challenges facing men. Unfortunately, they're giving bad advice and trying to "rewind the clock … to a time before feminism," she said. Then they kicked a puppy from this point: But that argument gets an eyeroll from Julie S. Lalonde, an Ottawa-based wo…
/r/MensRights21/10/23 12:11 AM
8

Pretty much all of these arguments revolve around just an assertion it exists. The problem you’ve overlooked is the gynocentric nature or aspect in society. You completely ignore that then blame a phantom. It basically comes down who or what is the main focus is in society, what gets people to support a movement or, what gets people voted into office. Edit: Missed a word
/r/MensRights19/10/23 10:56 PM
3

Paywall: https://metro.co.uk/2023/05/22/kent-police-officer-who-falsely-accused-her-ex-of-domestic-abuse-spared-jail-18823579/ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11898367/Police-officer-faces-prison-lying-sergeant-lover-gaslighting-saw-locked-up.html
/r/MensRights19/10/23 07:08 PM
78

As one poster put it, "the Kens had taken over Barbieland." Barbieland is the epitome of superficiality. It’s a child like view of a world. It’s wrong but it’s right on so many levels. In the movie Barbie never asked herself where the Ken’s lived. It never crossed her mind. Everything revolved around her and Ken was nothing more than an accessory to herself When there’s been so many layoffs theres going to be problems such as this. It’s funny reading their interpretations. Maybe talk to them and…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 01:39 AM
2

You could use JDownloader to extract the video. I've also created a copy -- downloaded it off the BBC's website and edited it -- I suppose I could upload it to Mega. Got it in two file formats -- mp4 and mkv -- since the latter couldn't be uploaded to here. It's 115mb and 125mb respectfully
/r/MensRights30/09/23 10:15 PM
3

Life in Bristol goes on beyond daylight hours, with many of us working, socialising and enjoying the city at night. And yet we know that being out at night can induce anxiety for many women, with most women surveyed having experienced some level of harassment. … 97% of women in Bristol have experienced sexual harassment https://www.bristolnights.co.uk/projects/its-not-ok States most then claims it’s almost all 🤨
/r/MensRights29/09/23 07:04 PM
40

From the premise of the segment to the end the topic issue was side-lined. Men have obviously have and arguably taken a lot of flack, rightly in the past few years post #meetoo With Ava Evans stating there should be on a Minister for Mental Health, then the focus should be on children. Then Frances O'Grady did a hold my beer. Brings up boys shouldn't be taught bravado then brings up a unrelated point -- the 'gender pay gap' and sexual harassment. Norcots' point was proved throughout. Whenever an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 07:07 PM
2

Why are you trolling this subreddit? I’ve gone through your posting history on here — you’re a POS
/r/MensRights28/09/23 02:28 AM
3

I don’t like The Sun. I won’t give them traffic.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 10:24 PM
2

I’m not clicking on that link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12529661/More-women-allegations-Russell-Brand-BBC-Channel4-Netflix.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/russell-brand-sexual-assault-police-b2413668.html https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-66835997 https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/sep/17/a-timeline-of-sexual-assault-allegations-against-russell-brand
/r/MensRights18/09/23 10:11 PM
17

They were already labelling men as perpetrators decades before Tate and with regards to Brand at this point it’s allegations Like almost everyone else, wait and see. If you don’t like that OP maybe revaluate your reasons for being on here. If this does lead to a court case Brand has the full legal right to a fair trial. Put down the pitchfork and stop the concern trolling.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:52 PM
14

Completely forgot about those. I can’t explain how much the Maltesers one annoyed me
/r/MensRights17/09/23 05:11 PM
9

There’s no way of telling Maybe there’s a financial incentive, from either the government or from organisations like the UN, to focus on one demographic over another It’s part of their new campaign. They might have numerous ones over the span of a year They received more donations when their campaign’s solely focused on women or children. There’s a potential hierarchy that focuses on the most needy or most vulnerable. And for whatever reasons, when men are either included or solely focused on, t…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:37 AM
2

I do get your point and if that was the case I’d agree. The problem is the groups aren’t being used to identify cheaters. They’d have to raise the standards before that’s applicable It just comes across as they’ve got to play a certain role and be skeptical when it comes to dating men If being in a relationship is the end goal this is potentially antithetical to it. Think of how those individuals could be affected by the group’s dynamics Anything and everything can and will be used against you. …
/r/MensRights16/09/23 01:38 AM
6

What can be done? I was discussing the problem the other day with a prominent female intellectual who won’t want to be named. As she said, it’s unrealistic to reverse the gains of the women’s rights movement and, in any case, wouldn’t that just be replacing one form of tyranny with another? No, what’s needed, she suggested, is something like the Equality Act. In the same way that made workplaces safe for women by reining in toxic male behaviour, this would stop female public servants giving in t…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 12:56 AM
8

Comments in question: https://reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/KB2SMibHzC Apparently, its totally on the woman for contraception and even if the man agrees to a vasectomy Lets drop the pretence here. There’s two types of male birth control — condoms and vasectomy. You get a choice whenever or not a condom is used and vasectomies should be treated as a permanent form. Not to be undertaken to be reversed later So that basically takes it down to one form. Please pray tell, how many forms do women have? If…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 12:10 AM
7

How’s it going over there on r/1950shouseholdwives or r/traditionalacademy? Edit: Or even r/misogynisticlife?
/r/MensRights14/09/23 11:47 PM
88

Their message seems to becoming normalised, more accepted, more openly discussed, parroted more, etc If you meant it’s spreading, yeah, I could agree with that
/r/MensRights12/09/23 01:46 AM
8

I never tried to, just gave an example of the sort of thing that I think a men's rights movement should be addressing. But you did try to use him as an example in what men’s rights should be fighting against We wonder why women make negative stereotypes about us when people like that are so overwhelmingly popular with young men? I doubt that. It’s never been proven to any extent how popular he is or what effect he has on anyone The way I see it is, he’s someone who can be pointed at and blamed f…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 01:22 AM
12

You won't find any good faith conversations here brother, I agree that it's disappointing. Ironic. You’re complaining about bad faith whilst posting in bad faith If this sub genuinely cared about men's issues, they'd be going after people like Andrew Tate who push toxic gender roles which cause things like high suicide rates for us. Andrew Tate has been around for at least the past six decades? Oh yeah, you’re really posting in good faith The media brought attention to him, his views and audienc…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 11:30 PM
15

So many people(you included) have such a weird view of feminism You can tell how serious or involved someone is by the depth of their arguments and how passionate — for the lack of a better word — someone is for a topic You’re an oddity. Your arguments are weak. You really don’t post feminist arguments. It’s more than likely you’re trolling and you just want to get a reaction than anything else that youve somehow acquired form some weird alt right news articles and twitter accounts whilst ignori…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 09:35 PM
2

I’d like to make the ethical decision to eat this hamburger. Nom 🍔
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/23 11:22 PM
10

It’s a premium article: https://thewest.com.au/news/wa/respectful-relationships-program-to-promote-healthy-interactions-in-wa-public-schools-to-expand-to-private-c-11762264 Instagram style introduction: https://thewest.com.au/stories/how-we-stop-this-kid-becoming-a-monster/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/23 08:59 AM
4

But it was just sat there on the porch
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/23 08:52 PM
6

Yeah, I figured as much. It’s pre-meditated murder
/r/MensRights02/09/23 10:14 AM
11

While having sex, Nikoubin blindfolded her date and then stabbed him in the neck with a pink kitchen knife that she’d brought with her. Something isn’t really adding up. Why take a knife with you to a hookup? Did the delusions happen before the meet-up or during? And why tie it to a fictional character — a vampire no less. Maybe I missed that specific scene when she used a knife on someone instead of her teeth
/r/MensRights02/09/23 12:51 AM
2

Egalitarianism is more of a belief system than anything else. You’ll have to excuse me, I don’t that’s picked up traction. To answer your question, no, one doesn’t exist. Movements will always be focused on specific issues. The two you mentioned are focused almost exclusively focused — arguably since the 70s-80s — on one sex Edit: There’s a few cases from the 70s where a MRA and a feminist worked side by side. I think there was more tolerance between the two movements
/r/MensRights30/08/23 10:55 PM
1

Read the part I quoted then the text below that 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights29/08/23 08:05 PM
3

It’s usually about money or revenge. Pretty sure it’s murdered by strangers then unknown (no culprit found). Kinda puts a dint in a otherwise good hypothesis there, dear /s Have you actually put any thought in to it? Outside of criminality that is. Oh, my mistake you’re here for a gotcha (or whatever the fuck) and you’re a new egg
/r/MensRights29/08/23 07:18 PM
29

Probably the same for me. It’d come down to certain beliefs. If it included the patriarchy then it’d be no. That seems to be one of the central tenets and there seems to be more discussion around dismantling it. What are they gonna do, create an interpretive dance that involves shadow boxing From speaking to certain people, it just seems you’ll be overly scrutinised, put on the spot, and asked your opinion on divisive subjects or news stories. It just felt like you can and will be thrown under t…
/r/MensRights27/08/23 03:42 PM
16

You felt uncomfortable and you left. You don’t know the other person or their intentions Edit: There’s nothing wrong with that. You did right
/r/MensRights26/08/23 04:42 PM
5

What will happen? Will the critics have a lower opinion of this subreddit?
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:30 PM
3

If a quota system is needed to ensure there’s a equal balance why is it only applied one way? Why is it only being applied to one sex? If it is indeed about equality shouldn’t it it apply to either sex?
/r/MensRights22/08/23 11:51 PM
0

It'[s odd, The passage you have referenced belongs to page 316 for the physical copy and page 364 for the digital one. And even if there is another copy with different page numbers, what you have cited appears nowhere near the material on page 298 I found a copy of the pdf online (since ebooks -- such as epub, mobi, etc -- typically use percentages), opened it up and then navigated to the page number in question. If you've got a fucking problem with that, then contact whoever made that copy avai…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/23 10:28 PM
1

"Not all women, but only women" was made, an ad hominem demonizing women by implying they're more likely to be serial killers. All I can agree with it's a pointless reply. It's a qualitative statement and it follows on from the title. Break it down: Nurse > neonatal > woman That's how I read it (the perpetrator was a nurse, who worked in a neonatal department, and is a woman)
/r/MensRights20/08/23 10:53 AM
-1

I did skim through it. The first thing that I noticed was the usage of elusive language and when I scrolled down to the sources it doesn't define surveillance capitalism I mean you could have summarised the above passive aggressive response in a single paragraph and approached it from a different angle. Providing something tangible that defines surveillance capitalism As far as I know that's tracking user location for marketing and advertising not manipulating Just gone back over it and noticed …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/23 10:27 AM
3

Not sure what I can reply with other than fair enough
/r/MensRights20/08/23 01:30 AM
5

I acknowledge that but I also acknowledge that women are the vast majority of domestic abuse victims and I think for you to try and get people to acknowledge struggles or disadvantages men have you need to acknowledge the struggles or disadvantages women face. They’re not mutually exclusive. If it was women also experience domestic violence you won’t get a disagreement. The problem would be what the acknowledgment is and what it’s tied to. So if it’s agreeing to a lie as a fact then there’s goin…
/r/MensRights20/08/23 01:19 AM
13

Hold up… What about your motive? You went looking for a gotcha so you could go, you’re not condemning this thing or person hard enough The point is if you want to complain about problems men face you need to also acknowledge the heinous things men do to women. Women facing certain disadvantages does not cancel out men having some. Who are you again? Oh, someone with a gripe with the men’s rights subreddit 🙄 “Whoopee doo”
/r/MensRights20/08/23 12:57 AM
1

Not sure why you're being downvoted here; I don't know what SpecificGlans was expecting in a list of female serial killers. Because it’s a straw argument. If it was about red cars and the discussion was limited to red cars you wouldn’t go “What? All cars aren’t red. There’s also blue ones” It’s in relation to the title. Which means is it one or multiple qualifiers (was it limited to amount of victims, women, nurses, or children). Can’t really answer that There’s been a few male nurses who killed…
/r/MensRights20/08/23 12:40 AM
29

You’ll have to excuse me, I don’t recall this. I do remember the screenshots, tho Thought the whole cancellation thing was about that
/r/MensRights20/08/23 12:09 AM
2

People are increasingly concerned about misinformation and disinformation. However, in all this discourse, there is zero talk about what has made people so susceptible to them, which can be attributed to the effects of surveillance capitalism. People have probably always been susceptible This essay is pertinent to this subreddit because I am sure we have all heard over and over again how right-wing movements rely on “young, lonely, disenfranchised males.” Did you also write something similar in …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/23 11:53 PM
15

I know this sub is full of extremely bitter men, but to celebrate cis women being silenced is a new low even by this sub's standards. Sexism, nice. You know it’s women silencing other women, right? The ones who pushed for inclusion and representation What happened? Did you forget that? Did it fall into the memory hole?
/r/MensRights18/08/23 12:45 AM
1

You’re just posting word salad. There hasn’t been a deconstruction of patriarchy. The sociological definition of patriarchy doesn’t exist outside of fantasy. Society wasn’t created for the sole benefit of men and women don’t exist in a vacuum. Anyone who repeats that line is a parrot who doesn’t understand the role everyone played and the expectations placed on everyone Even putting that aside, masculinity hasn’t had a positive redefinition. It’s been demonised as the cause of the ills in societ…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 12:10 AM
2

Dismantling the patriarchy could entail looking at why men perpetrate violence and creating gender based, violence prevention programs for boys/young men. Domestic violence and violence against women/children should be identified as a hate crime. How can the patriarchy be dismantled when it doesn’t exist? It’s a misnomer. Blaming all these factors in society, conflating them all into a neat little package then branding it Patriarchy It’s the Satan of the so called equality movement. Where everyo…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:27 PM
1

Not just as well as a men. Much better [than a man] Do better in the future, Comrade /s Edit: spellchecker 🤨
/r/MensRights14/08/23 07:03 PM
1

Other than giving them an ultimatum there’s nothing much you can do. They’re bitter poisonous people They need to realise that and the effect it’s having on other people. But they don’t have the ability or willingness to be able to see that Any pushback from you OP will just back up their case against men and against you So if you do do a ultimatum. Appeal to everyone in the group. Don’t make it about the sexists. Make it about how it’s wrong and sexist. If that’s twisted around just say you don…
/r/MensRights14/08/23 06:53 PM
40

No. The first comment is deleted (at 5k). The rest seem to be in support of him and he needs an exit strategy I skimmed through them. So wasn’t a deep dive
/r/MensRights14/08/23 12:26 AM
1

Why do WE have to give a shit? I'll try and approach this from more of a objective basis. There's no reason to give a shit about it. They'll probably be a split. You'll get those who can't see beyond their hatred of men and you might get those who'll see it as going too far. They may have an epiphany and roll back to an extent Why do we have to care whether the relationships between the sexes are ending or whether more men are becoming virgins Because that fuels it. If men overall are less exper…
/r/MensRights13/08/23 11:41 PM
2

I seriously hope that’s the case. I’ve watched a few interviews of both Bates and Moran. From the outside it looked like they were getting regular appearances If you can find it, Emma Watson interviewed Caitlin Moran. I won’t poison the well. I think the full version is just under eight minutes. And the BBC Radio interview is just as weird
/r/MensRights13/08/23 08:26 PM
5

I should probably clarify. The article promotes a Female Dating Strategy mindset of using and abusing men. Shera advises women over the age of 25 to seek out and date older, affluent men and to actively play games to get them. This includes hiding your insecurities from potential partners and using reverse psychology to manipulate men, so you can imitate intimacy without the risk that comes with true vulnerability. For example, if you’re feeling jealous because a man you’re dating doesn’t pick u…
/r/MensRights13/08/23 07:48 PM
5

You’ve got to be trolling. Go back over what you wrote
/r/MensRights13/08/23 06:35 PM
5

You might well just claim it's the role of men in society that upholds the patriarchy There are still people who uphold it. Where does that fit in to any of this? You make one claim, claim that was bad wording, then you post this
/r/MensRights13/08/23 06:12 PM
5

I apologize for the bad wording If you meant the originators of the patriarchy -- which women contributed to and probably lead the lead on -- they're dead. All of them are dead. It can't backfire on the dead What you posted only makes sense if you meant those who uphold it I don’t agree with the post but it sounds like u need to go outside. What u think is systemic misandry is just the patriarchy circling back to its creators
/r/MensRights13/08/23 06:03 PM
0

They were getting a high pay — past tense. Do you understand benefits associated with higher risks? They’re higher paid because there’s an higher element of risk associated with it, plus there can be longer shifts (12 hours), and it’s a high KPI environment If the pay between warehousing and retail is equalised then there’s less incentive to take those jobs. It was already shitty enough Edit: We need to work on making those jobs easier and less dangerous. I have made many posts and comments advo…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 07:59 PM
5

I don’t get your point. Also I got the notification of you replying just as I posted this. Just a few seconds passed. So did you read it? Are you a bot? Edit: Has spammed the same comment multiple times (across different subreddits)
/r/MensRights11/08/23 08:01 AM
5

I can’t find the article. It was published on Psychology Today. It wasn’t by Greg Matos ( https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/the-state-our-unions/202208/whats-behind-the-rise-lonely-single-men ) It was about a perceived skills gap in relationships and how it’s the fault of men. The author claimed to have spoken to multiple women (didn’t mention speaking to men) You can’t claim to have the solution when you’re claiming it’s from a certain criteria of people who’ve had bad relationships and t…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 07:55 AM
1

Personally I don’t like their beer. It’s the okay of beers. It isn’t good and it isn’t bad. It’s just okay
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:18 PM
1

The manoshere has nowhere that kind of reach and coordination to commit online crimes like that. It’s gotten to the point of any pushback or criticism must be from those that are part of it. You must have noticed any replies that are deemed to be bad are automatically assumed to be from a man It’s like certain subreddits when they get spicy replies. It’s assumed they were made by men and they are from bad subreddits These types of posts attract problematic posters… [sic]
/r/MensRights08/08/23 06:21 PM
3

There’s a few things being overlooked. What if these incorrect definitions become more mainstream There’s a financial incentive in terms of book sales, interviews, and speaking engagements for not only Bates, but for anyone who wants to make a name for themselves And secondly, Bates allegedly joined a forum and pretended to be a boy. She’d write these forum posts and play pretend with regards to this pretend boys thought processes and emotions. I don’t think that’s particularly ethical. That’s b…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 06:15 PM
1

Probably the best response would be: So you’re saying men generally don’t live for more than a century but women live for centuries to millennia? Look at the responses. “We” had to put up with it
/r/MensRights06/08/23 01:23 PM
1

You’re replied with something separate. On a societal level either gynocentricism or androcentricism is the focus. Responsibility is separate from that But whatever, reply with a fucking emoticon
/r/MensRights06/08/23 01:19 PM
1

How does that fit in to my reply?
/r/MensRights06/08/23 01:14 PM
1

What am I supposed to make of this cryptic reply?
/r/MensRights06/08/23 01:11 PM
1

Yeah, it was dropped from the Penguin library. If there’s little interest in it they’ll usually drop it. It’d come down to the licence costs — if there’s a fee based on how many times it’s played. If that goes under a specific amount it’d be classified as being unprofitable. It might be similar to deletion. That’s when music is deleted from a music label’s catalog
/r/MensRights06/08/23 01:09 PM
2

And when it comes to statistics they’ll back up the myth rape is perpetrated overwhelmingly by males — the 99% figure This allows them to maintain the narrative and be able to say that both sexes have equal legal protection. Somewhat equal. Whenever a petition for changing rape laws gets over 10k signatures that’s pretty much the response. The difference mentioned is sex without consent can be given a life sentence They don’t focus on the actual sentences handed out as they could differ
/r/MensRights06/08/23 12:30 AM
-5

Patriarchy and matriarchy, and gynocentricism and androcentricism are two separate things One is the rule of either fathers or mothers and the other is a society centred or focused exclusively on one sex (be it women or men — gyno or andro)
/r/MensRights06/08/23 12:01 AM
15

Jake Davison posted probably a grand total of two posts (I believe the one was deleted) and three comments. Maybe one or two people responded to him and he never posted again. The mods on here decided to leave the post and comments up. I vaguely remember one of them leaving a comment The press used a screen shot of what he thought of his mother (it was something along the lines of disliking her). If I'm remembering correctly they didn't censor his username so it was easy enough to find his conte…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 11:22 PM
1

There’s a video from about two months ago from their YouTube channel entitled “The men fighting a mental health crisis as UK gets poorer” https://youtu.be/hw_JMjv3sm0 Edit: It’s an oddity. They’ll publish all these articles bashing men but occasionally they’ll publish something positive Like how they’ve got an article by Ally Fogg on their website from several years ago. I’ve read a few of this Twitter threads. They’re pretty good https://www.theguardian.com/profile/allyfogg
/r/MensRights05/08/23 11:01 PM
11

But if it's a woman doing the same thing to a man, passers by are much less likely to intervene or get involved. There’s a video that mirrors that from a few years ago. It’s CCTV from a Scottish pub. The guy is just stood at the bar and this woman approaches him, gives him a Glasgow kiss, then starts repeatedly punches him. No one intervenes until she’s knocked over. They just stand there whilst he’s attacked Going back to the social experiments. There’s one in which the people walking past find…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 04:12 PM
4

I don’t think there’s one. The closest in fiction I can think of is a book entitled Sphere. I think the main three three main characters could be called egocentric (they’re blinded by their elephants and baggage) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphere_(novel) The same author also wrote Disclosure Edit: The movie doesn’t focus anywhere as much on their identities
/r/MensRights05/08/23 03:49 AM
1

I say you're just using Progressive buzzwords to attack...you have no examples. Watched this HBR video (Ethan Debates Pearl Davis of JustPearlyThings): https://www.youtube.com/live/B5kzoaJvzHA source H3H3: https://www.youtube.com/live/euuma5CoFis Watched this HBR video (Pearl Takes Off the Gloves on Piers Morgan, Let's She How She Does): https://www.youtube.com/live/lRHRZ-R19Hw source Piers Morgan Uncensored: https://youtu.be/Uz1uh3FQulY (clip: "The 'Female Andrew Tate' Pearl Davis On Why She Th…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 03:28 AM
1

I stated reactionary. I didn’t state or imply manosphere. If that’s your takeaway that’s on you If I did that’d be weird considering what the manoaphere supposedly is and how much it covers Yay, assumption is king Probably not. You're too busy examining minutae for impurity… You could have asked a clarifying question. Instead you assume the worst
/r/MensRights04/08/23 08:06 PM
-5

Did what exactly? He was drunk; she was drunk. They went off somewhere and he got frisky and he started fingering her. She passed out at some point Some passerbyers saw them. They thought he was raping her. He got scared and ran off When he was identified/found someone messed up the offence he was facing/charged with He actually did it tho... Because you’re being told the person in the OOP is innocent. What would your opinion be if you got told the opposite and he was guilty? Edit: The irony is …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/23 06:57 PM
1

How exactly does she damage men and boys advocacy? It's the stuff she says. It's reactionary -- said to cause a reaction. Doesn't, or at least didn't, back anything up during debates. That kind of changed with the Piers Morgan debate and she pushed back somewhat
/r/MensRights04/08/23 06:22 PM
1

I concur, Pearl is a grifter, who damages the profile of men and boys advocacy IMO. Anymore than the opponents? For years there's been all these individuals and organisations who’ve taken a huge shit on the MRM, tied it to the worst of humanity, and strawmanned it to fuck If Pearl just vanished tomorrow -- a Weeping Angel touched Pearl and her entire existence just vanished -- nothing much would change. There might be fewer people who know about the men's rights movement. But the overall image o…
/r/MensRights04/08/23 06:17 PM
4

It’s just the show stopping than anything else. If she’s made contacts influencing people via videos is kinda irrelevant when you can talk to people who can make the changes It really comes down how much money she can make from doing that. Since she can’t really go back to doing videos since she’s pretty much irrelevant The world has moved on since GG even though certain individuals and outlets have dug up the rotting corpse multiple times
/r/MensRights04/08/23 12:27 AM
1

Would ya stick to the rape fantasy subreddits Edit: New account. Reported this post. Had no idea such subreddits existed If mod reads there’s other bad posts by same user
/r/MensRights02/08/23 05:56 PM
1

There has to be a better way to enact consequences for parental alienation without more parental alienation Are you serious? That isn’t parental alien. Parental alienation is turning the child against the other parent That could be along the lines of creating a situation where the non-custodial partner isn’t being allowed to see their child, then telling their child, oh, your Daddy doesn’t want to see you. Or, he left us and he’s got his own life now It’s telling lies to the child to pit them ag…
/r/MensRights02/08/23 05:49 PM
12

This video explains it well I think: The Alt-Right Playbook: How to Radicalize a Normie Are you trying to be ironic? If there’s any truth to this, you provided the problem. You just removed agency from these metaphorical individuals and gone with, they must have been duped by the *dun dun dunnnn* alt-right with their propaganda and cookies And the premise is wrong. The political compass comprises of four squares — y is a scale measuring where someone is between authoritarianism and liberalism; x…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 07:22 AM
0

Shouldn’t that be post it over there and get banned? The Men’s Rights Advocate label won’t go well over there
/r/MensRights31/07/23 04:40 PM
15

All you're doing is adding to the slew of wrong opinions about a subject you know little about. If I read an article or watched a segment with this opinion -- something that's widely available -- I'd probably become more withdrawn at least for a while. Why? because I'm sick of all this bullshit. Incel is just a popularist term. It just means here's a demographic you can say anything about. It's the hidden danger within society. They hate women, you know. The press might as well add kicking puppi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/23 07:55 PM
7

Expendability, u/Shithouses. Expendability. Maybe you could watch some videos how some Republican senators frame it — in relation to their daughters It’s funny. You deem it misogyny but you completely ignore the men who die in wars and your only take is, “wELl WHo MAde THem GO to WAr?”
/r/MensRights28/07/23 07:53 PM
2

You know exactly what I mean — the reply in which you asked for a source Edit: Spelling
/r/MensRights28/07/23 07:42 PM
2

Oh wow. Much lulz. Got any more? Why are you pretending women exist in a vacuum? You remember when you asked for a source?
/r/MensRights28/07/23 07:35 PM
3

Its pretty strange when all the examples of misogyny are done by men and almost all the examples of misandry are done by men. Got a source there?
/r/MensRights28/07/23 07:19 PM
5

That’s an absolutely insane take. The gymnastics that took to twist it around from something that’s misandric to something that’s misogynistic is amazing
/r/MensRights28/07/23 07:17 PM
1

In the UK there’s the 1885 Labouchere Amendment. That was in force until the Sexual Offences Act 1967. The punishment was life in prison Prior to 1861 the Buggery Act 1533 was in force. Homosexual acts were a capital punishment. I’m unsure from when, a judge could commute the death sentence and instead send the offender to prison. There was a book a number of years ago that got numerous facts wrong and was pulped. One of the cases mentioned in the book was of an 18 year old who raped an 8 year o…
/r/MensRights28/07/23 05:56 PM
6

What circumstances? This seems to be over an argument about not being able to go to the hairdressers I’m pretty sure the words you’re looking for include the words lack of suitable hairdo and you’re comparing that to those who’ve been abused physically, mentally, and sexually Then going, oh, those too should be showed compassion. As there’s some comparison between the two She should have received a long prison sentence. It’s like you’re pretending to show compassion but you forgot someone lost t…
/r/MensRights28/07/23 12:50 AM
1

Which evidence? The only blood evidence I can remember was tainted by the EMTs and there was a planted glove
/r/MensRights27/07/23 12:56 AM
8

The guy is toast. I believe what she is really asking is: "Should I divorce this man or would I be an immoral person?" It’s more than likely she’s made the decision to divorce him but she wants validation for her decision
/r/MensRights27/07/23 12:39 AM
2

You’ve got to be trolling. Social expectations for come from society. Current society is controlled by modern feminism. Current society teaches boys that its bad to be a man. Dame current society that promotes bs like evil masculinity. Faulty logic. There’s always been an element of gynocentricism within society and there’s always been an expectation placed on men. But there was also an expectation placed on women — for their role within society — which has slowly been eroded If you don’t agree …
/r/MensRights25/07/23 06:40 PM
1

Maybe there’s some overlay with responsibilities but ultimately it’s sacrifice. Sacrificing yourself for the betterment of others You’ve misconstrued it. The responsibility part is split between social expectations (expectations placed upon someone) and perceived social benefits (dismantling meritocracy and replacing it with system based on intrinsic values) The people you’re describing want the latter not the former. The former is caused when you remove men’s value and demonise them You destroy…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 06:19 PM
1

It has nothing to do with respect and it has everything to with sacrifice. You would decide you’d sacrifice yourself so someone else would have a chance at living. My death was decided and I realised I just really respect a stranger’s wife too damned much. I shout out “I really respect that man; I really respect that man’s wife” as the Titanic quickly sinks into the dark cold waters. I’m stood in a line with other men as the water begins to embrace me and the other completely respectful men Mayb…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 05:45 PM
7

There isn’t a steady stream of them. It probably goes back probably five or six decades The one I noticed was a advert for Kellogg’s. It showed a man resembling a neanderthal prior to eating cornflakes then magically becoming human
/r/MensRights24/07/23 03:36 PM
1

That isn’t exactly true. There’s like five different offence groups. You focused on the last one I mean rape of someone (female/male) under 16 (and above 13) can fall under a S1. If it’s been classified as a sexual assault it could fall under a S2 or S3 The thing here is, he couldn’t legally give consent so technically it should have been classified as a S1. I think that was the previous poster’s argument
/r/MensRights24/07/23 03:19 PM
1

Think I’m getting you. The middle ground is vanishing and what’s left is the extremes on either side
/r/MensRights23/07/23 11:48 PM
2

"Emma Watson explains why some men have a problem with feminism." The Heforshe UN campaign? The one in which Watson gave boys permission to be human? Oh, no! You’re stuck in a box let’s put you in another box Edit: Emma Watson interviewed Caitlin Moran some six years back. Moran said the most deranged stuff and Watson just kept saying “Yep”
/r/MensRights23/07/23 11:42 PM
3

Hit up some youtube videos of feminists reacting to MRA stuff, some of them are decent, it will restore your faith in humanity :) Such as?
/r/MensRights23/07/23 01:37 PM
2

Maybe stop posting with your puppet account
/r/MensRights20/07/23 09:32 PM
2

Is that the full quote or did you clip it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/23 11:11 PM
9

He's a public figure who, arguably by even his own admission, has acted in a way which is not ideal. You don’t even know what’s it’s in relation to. It could be speaking over someone, rubbing someone’s shoulders or, unwanted contact like hugging someone or, a complete misinterpretation And on top of that, there’s power dynamics. He owned a production company. That’d be viewed as having an unequal amount of power You know he lost his production company over this? He was forced to stand down over …
/r/MensRights19/07/23 06:21 PM
3

But It definitely doesn't help. Yes, I know which sub I'm in, and I'm here because I like to see things from all sides, but it's hard when I see men hating on women just for replying to a question about their own personal experiences. I don’t know if you saw my other reply. That explains it better. You don’t know what anyone here has experienced When I joined a socialising group, I certainly noticed something similar. Anything from small niggles or, you look or dress in a certain fashion or, rem…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 11:46 PM
5

To counter this, Emba believes men need a “positive vision” of masculinity that is “neither neutral nor interchangeable with femininity.” Anytime someone suggests a new or positive version of masculinity it’s almost always got baggage It’s tied to the bad aspects of humanity or some malevolent force. They double down completely ignoring the failures to address issues affecting men and boys and come up with the plan of oh, lets redefine masculinity. It must be the thing that’s wrong. They must be…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 07:06 PM
2

Lets pretend the OP is on the dating scene and has experienced this type of attitude, this paranoia about men. Would that not be the OPs experience? Would that not be valid? The premise in the OP is, a man used the word spontaneous in his dating profile. So that must mean anyone who uses it is either lazy or married If you’ve been on the dating scene for any amount of time and been in a socialising group you’ll notice how silly things in the screenshots are used as red flags All it does is revea…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 06:04 PM
3

Maybe you should look at the subreddit you’re posting in. Patriarchy is the rule of the father. It applies to households and once upon a time villages. Not this bastardisation that melds responsibility, tradition, and Stockholm syndrome The argument you just made is, women who do that were mould by men. As if they don’t have their own personalities or the ability to form their own opinions. The argument you made is women have to be manipulated by men (or some nefarious invisible force known as t…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 05:52 PM
2

Maybe because they're being told that all of their value is based on their looks and that they're being constantly told by men that it's all they're good for? Women judge other women. That includes their body type, boob size, fashion sense, etc. It isn’t exclusive to men
/r/MensRights18/07/23 04:31 PM
3

There’s a few things I don’t get. I went over his websites to find something, anything. But I was unable Think there were claims there were certain things written on there (the BBC interviewer wasn’t specific) I’ve read comments that mirror stating that there’s an archive of his website on the Wayback Machine. But when I checked it the URL had been excluded The messages (the tenants) on his websites seemed to be pretty conservative and Hustler University seems to revolve around ICT. It’s a bit o…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 10:31 PM
2

Thanks, I missed that thread the first time around
/r/MensRights11/07/23 11:55 PM
3

But your compassion was to what, shame the OP?
/r/MensRights11/07/23 06:36 PM
6

You weren’t exactly compassionate in your first reply Wouldn’t that be subsidising someone else regardless of your own personal circumstances? Edit: Isn’t there another person in the equation? There’s two parents. You don’t put the entire financial burden on one Also, initially you knew nothing about the OPs circumstances or financial situation.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 06:23 PM
3

Re-read the title What’s going wrong for men, and the thing that can fix them It isn’t fix issues that are external to men. It’s fix men as there must be something wrong with them to be experiencing these issues I think my presumption – as a 48-year-old, fourth-wave feminist – was that straight white men were generally doing so fine that they were the one sociodemographic group you could lovingly … beat up on a bit. That’s an unbelievable understatement. Lovingly? She’d dress them up as devils a…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 09:10 PM
54

If the evidence is how the employer reacted to the case then yes, that’s evidence His was physically assaulted twice and sexually assaulted once by the same colleague The employer dragged their feet with the investigation and came to the conclusion it was just banter Edit: Could you imagine the freaking news if the reverse happened “Asda employee not fired after sexually and physically assaulting female colleague Bosses told victim it was just banter”
/r/MensRights29/06/23 06:58 PM
1

I meant more in the sense of someone hearing it and dismissing it on the basis of who left the message
/r/MensRights24/06/23 07:34 PM
6

I wouldn’t go straight to HR. I’d talk to someone you know and trust first. Worst case scenarios are if you go straight to HR are, you’ll be laughed off or told it’s an ambiguous sound and you’re filling in the gaps to what it may be You’ve got to remember how the sexes are viewed when it comes to sex or sexual activity And Human Resources usually only have the companies interest at heart. They’re there to look out for potential repetitional or liability issues against the company If you think y…
/r/MensRights24/06/23 04:02 PM
3

Both of those positions are feminist — the rights of women. Since trans women and women, and men are against women to the extent of becoming women and something about male violence (read Rowling’s open letter) They pretty much agree on the tenants of feminism. The main contention between the two is trans people. Feminists believe they should be treated as the sex they transitioned to or identify as You could flip the image — it’s feminist to put Karen White in a men’s/women’s prison. It works bo…
/r/MensRights24/06/23 02:19 AM
1

It’s a bit vague with regards to which new laws — it could be expanding ViSOR or an act
/r/MensRights23/06/23 02:42 AM
54

Usually I get either educate yourself or just Google it. Occasionally that’s topped with intersectionality and it isn’t my place to provide that
/r/MensRights23/06/23 02:08 AM
36

Anyone check the app screenshots? They may state it’s endorsement but in reality that couldn’t be further from the truth It reminds me of a pyramid scheme. Women on the service can become Ringleaders. They get men to sign up to the service and they receive something called Fleetpoints The more men a Ringleader gets signed up to the service, the more Fleetpoints women and any men they signed up get It may state men they know but there’s a two problems. One is there’s a leader board and two, there…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/23 01:11 AM
1

Got any book suggestions?
/r/MensRights21/06/23 10:00 PM
3

Haven’t put much thought with regards to dms. There’s a degree of separation and if it’s in public you have to physically move away from there and hope your excuses are good enough
/r/MensRights21/06/23 08:55 PM
6

When someone approaches you irl
/r/MensRights21/06/23 08:51 PM
3

Probably the easiest method is a friend of one of your friends. You’ve got to initiate first — become the friend Biggest con is it turns sour though and potentially fewer friends
/r/MensRights21/06/23 08:37 PM
5

That’s probably a mixture of boundary, self-consciousness, and disguise reflex I’ve got some stuff to do so gotta be afk but I can expand on that Edit: Forgot comfort/comfort zone
/r/MensRights21/06/23 08:31 PM
3

I may only be speaking for myself here.. but most women don't like being "approached" But you can only speak for yourself not most women For example. If someone I don't know messages me with something like "hi", it's an instant red flag, no matter what they look like I’m pretty sure the issue is a unknown person sending you messages. Would you classify that as a unsolicited messaging? That’s unless this person sent an engaging message that piqued your interest? I’d have to learn towards no And b…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 08:27 PM
5

Two problems with that. That doesn’t provide me with the definition of patriarchy you’re using and it doesn’t provide me your sources. The ones you used, if any
/r/MensRights21/06/23 02:28 AM
2

How about you provide a source for any of your claims? And how about a freaking definition for patriarchy?
/r/MensRights21/06/23 01:47 AM
6

After scrolling through this subreddit I’d argue it’s about the same mindset, just against women. I’ve never seen a movement so anti-women than this one It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em. but when speaking with feminists they just about always consider both sides. There’s talking and there’s putting that into practice. I’d like to see that here as well, since I feel it’s a socially intelligent and progressive way to settle our differences and advocate against the mai…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 01:40 AM
6

Tell that to HR and see how that goes down
/r/MensRights20/06/23 01:39 AM
2

I didn’t think of it in that way, thanks. I posted it so it could be used as a resource for arguments against it Edit: There’s a flair for inactivism. So changed it to that
/r/MensRights18/06/23 09:13 PM
3

They haven’t changed their position. It’s a paper that contradicts their own position and it’s a pretty good write up with references
/r/MensRights18/06/23 08:20 PM
13

They’ve got a study on their website that contradicts their policy on circumcision Copied from conclusion (start of second paragraph): As argued here, nontherapeutic circumcision of male minors is not medically justifiable and violates the cardinal principles of medical ethics, including preserving a child’s future autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice. Circumcision should be at least delayed until the affected person reaches an age of understanding and is able to make his own risk-…
/r/MensRights18/06/23 07:04 PM
2

I thought front page appeared on the app as home — a collection of posts from subreddits you’re subscribed to or have visited
/r/MensRights17/06/23 08:34 AM
3

Why r/FeMRAdebates? When posts from there appear on the front page usually they’re pretty bad — low quality, argumentative I’m curious — I might have missed some aspect of that subreddit
/r/MensRights17/06/23 08:15 AM
2

Also: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/1918-centenary-votes-for-some-women-and-all-men/
/r/MensRights17/06/23 08:00 AM
11

The biggest thing that’s overlooked here is, DARVO can be a form of DARVO. The media response to Depp was the continuation of the psychological abuse and the ghost authored article was the icing
/r/MensRights13/06/23 08:17 PM
10

That’s more to do with a sense of guilt that’s been forced on to you. Men and male sexuality have been shamed for at least the past six decades
/r/MensRights13/06/23 07:51 PM
3

That’s the case most men’s prisons. They’re outdated and overcrowded
/r/MensRights12/06/23 09:39 PM
2

Thanks 🙂
/r/MensRights11/06/23 11:49 PM
2

It’s closed for the blackout. Someone posted the subs custom message with links
/r/MensRights11/06/23 07:27 PM
15

Yes: https://www.plan.de/presse/umfragen-und-berichte/spannungsfeld-maennlichkeit.html
/r/MensRights11/06/23 07:05 PM
8

It's odd when so much information is missing when you use the official app
/r/MensRights11/06/23 07:04 PM
3

Don’t think that’s the case. It’s more to do with troll and sock puppet accounts. Was a big issue a while back. Presumably most were created by the same person. Their current account would eventually get banned and they’d open up a new one
/r/MensRights11/06/23 06:42 PM
44

Yes, after you posted. Was afk I can’t find the study, the NGO who they quoted stating it’s appalling and I don’t understand the vernacular hand slipped Edit: Found the study
/r/MensRights11/06/23 06:31 PM
1

Ah, no problem. I thought about it a bit and didn’t want to assume you’re in the US (or if you meant I’m in the US) That goes the same for r/uknews. If you’re still looking for a group look up Prick Advice on Facebook. There should be a few groups still around from 2019
/r/MensRights11/06/23 05:49 PM
1

Who’s US and who’s UK?
/r/MensRights11/06/23 05:45 PM
167

So what happened to the two thirds? Did they vanish? It really comes down to what questions were asked and if the conclusion was massaged
/r/MensRights11/06/23 05:44 PM
2

Then frame it better. If you’re being truthful all you’ve done is pulled a Shakespearian new news and hoped anyone reading it would fill in the context There are loads of sectors dominated by women. Thats not news If that was the case that’s not new would have sufficed
/r/MensRights11/06/23 05:42 PM
10

They’re teaching the next generation. Boys need mentors, someone they can look up to. I’m pretty sure in schools that have adopted male mentorship’s there’s been good outcomes — higher grades and less detention Or I suppose I could frame it as equality when it’s suited and dismantled when someone of the wrong sex tries to use it It should be news, you don’t get to dictate shit
/r/MensRights11/06/23 05:34 PM
2

Funny. I just stated I did that and just found the one post which was about a freaking myth that hasn’t died which started in the 19th century
/r/MensRights11/06/23 02:53 AM
3

From what I can see you posted one. That was about UTIs. Maybe you posted one about clubfoot or penile cancer or some other subject. This is the 21st century — not the 19th
/r/MensRights11/06/23 02:49 AM
4

Studies? Where? All you’ve done is freaking argue Deal with facts and not your feminine histrionics. You’re seriously trolling this topic?
/r/MensRights11/06/23 02:11 AM
0

It isn’t interesting. It’s sociopathic. For whatever reasons, they don’t understand the roles men performed. They had to put their issues to one side for the betterment of the family unit. They had to be stoic And men approach issues differently than woman on average. Woman on average will talk about issues they’re facing whereas men don’t. If it’s an ongoing issue that has to be fixed first. Edit: Intentionally or unintentionally, this argument sidelines the issue. At this point I’m leaning tow…
/r/MensRights08/06/23 01:35 AM
3

I seriously don’t get these videos in general or the reaction to them. I used to be recommended some series on Facebook. The formula was always the same so I just stopped watching them
/r/MensRights07/06/23 07:23 PM
3

It’s just a silly complaint. On the face of it they’re usually not equivalents. There’s a difference between materials and contents Even if x and y were exactly the same. The difference in cost could be due to how many x versus y are manufactured. If it’s manufactured in bulk then on average x should be cheaper than y if it’s manufactured on a greater scale. And on top of that you’ve got how much the consumer is willing to spend. There could be a higher margin on y different due to who it’s mark…
/r/MensRights07/06/23 07:14 PM
2

What if they do but their posts are deleted and they’re banned? That happened with What’s-her-name some months back before she eventually posted on here. Has a OF so 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights05/06/23 12:25 AM
5

Vácrátót, Hungary
/r/MensRights02/06/23 12:08 AM
1

I’d actually like where they got that claim from. Unless the CPS published data from a FOI request. There’s no way of calculating how many rapists are convicted from the court data The court statistics they release are on a offence basis. It isn’t one person per offence. You could have someone who’s been convicted of multiple offences but isn’t found guilty of all of them, which would skew the data And on top of that, prior to the Cooties, there was a substantial amount of cases with no recorded…
/r/MensRights27/05/23 05:22 PM
1

It’s probably a form of coping or being roped in doing it. You’ll find some have this timeline of events they hope will play out. They’ve got these things they need to do at certain points in their life That could be career, partying and, then settling down at a specific age then having children. Storing eggs could be similar to a goal. They’ve partly done their part and they’ve got a specific age in mind but it doesn’t play out. They don’t find the right partners or they’re out of sync or their…
/r/MensRights26/05/23 03:08 AM
1

I don’t get your argument. You’re strawmanning me
/r/MensRights26/05/23 02:24 AM
2

You can be honest and still technically lie. What I mean is, they’d be two perceptions of the event One person could think: “Wow this is going well” And the other person could be interpreting it completely differently
/r/MensRights25/05/23 01:39 AM
2

The issues they listed read as symptoms of the problem. This is usually either ignored or twisted around and the blame is put on men for leaving society They could have added more information around why men are doing that. But there’s some truth to that list Here’s an article — from last month — that blames men: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/apr/23/motherhood-women-freeze-eggs-male-partners-men-fertility
/r/MensRights24/05/23 12:51 AM
11

I asked a simple question. Seems you’re the one that’s being argumentative
/r/MensRights24/05/23 12:24 AM
16

How does this stop ‘being groped by randos?’ Is it a electric vest?
/r/MensRights24/05/23 12:18 AM
5

Seriously? I can see a lot of very bitter people on Twitter fuming over this.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 02:23 AM
-4

Thought I recognised the name. He’s done several Triggernometry interviews. I didn’t particularly like him after watching one of them. I don’t recall which one
/r/MensRights10/05/23 02:10 AM
3

Originally thought it was something to do with Family Guy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_principle
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:31 PM
5

That’s probably the troll that keeps creating accounts That account was created some three hours ago
/r/MensRights07/05/23 01:02 AM
5

Yeah, there’s possibly a few hundred million. And yes, whenever that subject is brought up, ‘incel killings’ is usually tied to about fifty five Like gosh golly, they’re such a big threat that they’re incapable of going above double digits /s
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:05 AM
2

I think it’s just a manipulation of reality to suggest it’s false that the majority of domestic abuse cases have women victims. Was this in relation to the previous poster? One of your main tactics seems to be bringing up something that wasn’t mentioned or implied I’m not really sure what’s so threatening to you MRAs about recognising that. What are you using to form the basis of this argument? I don’t get the point of your argument or why you’re framing it as such. You’ve shifted the focus to s…
/r/MensRights04/05/23 01:05 AM
13

Oh, the resident troll
/r/MensRights03/05/23 01:05 AM
1

It’s the status quo. I think the edit covers it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/23 07:40 PM
2

Ironically, men who are raped by women have the experience of a woman in the 60s. I don’t get the irony. Women even back then couldn’t technically be convicted of rape. Look up the Sexual Offences Act 1956 It was against the law to rape a woman. What you outlined was the social aspect Instead, they ignore this and introduce gender discrimination into the justice system, risking the railroading of men into prison. It isn’t being introduced it’s being maintained and potentially increased Theres no…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/23 04:55 PM
1

You read it, right? That’s more to do with transgender care and seriously, that’s Alabama not the entire fucking world There is no technicalities here, it is literally legal in every country. Your best counter would have been because it isn’t actively prosecuted it makes it technically legal But oh no, you had to go with a law that’s in connection to something else, that’s in a single US state when your original point was “In every country”
/r/MensRights19/04/23 08:38 PM
1

It is a technicality. There isn’t a law in place making it legal. The procedure itself should fall foul of the law but it isn’t prosecuted
/r/MensRights18/04/23 04:44 PM
3

Both the WHO and NHS classify genital piercing as FGM. other harmful procedures to the female genitals, including pricking, piercing, cutting, scraping or burning the area The WHO updated their definition and the NHS followed suit https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/female-genital-mutilation-fgm/
/r/MensRights18/04/23 02:01 AM
1

Well it just repeated anything sent to it
/r/MensRights18/04/23 01:53 AM
1

Calling Doctor Nineteenth Century. Calling Doctor Nineteenth Century
/r/MensRights18/04/23 01:51 AM
2

Technically it isn’t. It’s a form of assault/ABH or GBH with intent. They’d have to be a law making it legal for that to be the case
/r/MensRights17/04/23 09:23 PM
8

No problem. Just happened to be reading it: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation
/r/MensRights17/04/23 09:17 PM
21

You should probably know there are different forms of FGM with that being one Look up the definition by the World Health Organisation
/r/MensRights17/04/23 09:12 PM
8

Probably the vast majority at least aren’t related to religion but instead related to tradition
/r/MensRights17/04/23 09:10 PM
1

Why is your response a fallacy? All you can really claim is, he’s a good chess player and possibly he’s competitive playing against so many others Edit: The fallacy is, you’ve tied his ability to play chess to IQ with no basis and you don’t even know who the guy is (or what his IQ is): In a private room, the man was asked for identification, and he eventually came clean, admitting that he was a university student who needed the cash.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 06:11 PM
1

Yeah, it’s seen as murder so therefore immoral
/r/MensRights17/04/23 05:54 PM
3

Not only that. You’ll find researchers are viewing things through a lens. Like all the different articles about a number of graves containing supposedly transgender people. The only basis for that seems to be those graves contained weapons. There’s little context as to why they’ve been buried alongside weaponry. Probably the more straight forward explanation would be either that person helped them in some way or was integral in those weapons being forged The further you go back the more that’s l…
/r/MensRights17/04/23 12:06 AM
2

Wasn't masculinism a parody of feminism? That’s how it started out. It was supposed to be a gendered flip to show the absurdity of feminism. Not sure if it became a thing because Poe’s Law PS thought I’d just look up the term. I found a Wikipedia article (stating the term was coined in 1914) and a number of dictionary definitions. I do remember it being a meme some years back
/r/MensRights16/04/23 10:32 AM
2

You mean tribalism? My group good; that other group bad — they believe this and this No, it starts off with early education. It’s entirely possible they’ve never seen or experienced it, but they’ve been told it exists so therefore must exist It’s also possible they’re seeing something that doesn’t exist. I read a post on r/menslib a while back that defied reality — I don’t remember the specifics, though. They took something (an action) and applied the worst possible interpretation they could to …
/r/MensRights11/04/23 01:47 AM
4

Simping isn't culturally ingrained, though. Yes it is. I think this sub has either widly misunderstood what I was saying, or I worded my position very poorly. For men to go about courting the way they do, it has to be ingrained socially That’s basically the dos and don’ts of what they can do and what’s expected of them
/r/MensRights11/04/23 01:02 AM
4

Their posts remind me of ChatGPT
/r/MensRights11/04/23 12:21 AM
8

Link from the linked post: https://web.archive.org/web/20230407014644/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/04/05/chatgpt-lies/ I’ve gone around in circles with ChatGPT asking it questions about PHP and resources. I once asked it about books for handlebars and it gave me two lists of titles and authors. The lists were fabricated I noticed something odd about the article. It could be applied to yellow journalism. Outlets that build lies on articles and vague Wikipedia entries Edit: Restr…
/r/MensRights10/04/23 10:07 AM
0

Kinda ironic. You posted this to a cesspool
/r/MensRights09/04/23 05:27 PM
13

So in other words you’ve got nothing
/r/MensRights09/04/23 12:39 AM
8

You’re a troll through and through that just keeps creating accounts to troll this subreddit, so yeah, walk off a pier Maybe actually put time and thought in to your answer: Federal Law requires nearly all male US citizens and male immigrants, 18 through 25, register with Selective Service https://www.sss.gov/ You can be denied opportunities, benefits and, even receive a prison sentence for not signing up for Selective Service: If required to register with Selective Service, failure to register …
/r/MensRights08/04/23 11:50 PM
24

Will you do everyone a favour and walk off a pier? Four hour account
/r/MensRights08/04/23 11:33 PM
11

🤨
/r/MensRights04/04/23 12:05 AM
19

The reason why you can’t be both. Feminism is predicated on certain beliefs. Like the existence of patriarchy — that revolves around society was created for the benefit of men at the expense of women
/r/MensRights03/04/23 10:38 PM
24

The tenants of feminism
/r/MensRights03/04/23 09:56 PM
5

Are you drunk?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/23 12:44 AM
2

Those organisations actually have power. It’s kinda ironic that about 2% of the population have more political power than 48%ish
/r/MensRights31/03/23 09:25 PM
1

I’m pretty sure the MRM was equated with Terfs the other week. All these Twits on Twitter batted on about it
/r/MensRights31/03/23 09:20 PM
4

I’m assuming you’re in the UK going by your vernacular and you mentioned tube. There’s a difference between the two — if you’re in the UK the drunks are most likely going to be British Point taken
/r/MensRights31/03/23 09:17 PM
3

Holy run on sentences, Batman. Wtf is ‘some many’ suppose to mean? You are against them, as your perception is they’re disrespectful and unhinged
/r/MensRights31/03/23 09:05 PM
3

Adverts where? The only thing I can think of is tracked search results When you look for a specific thing and you get adverts on sites other than the one you’re usually browsing (like on articles or on Facebook) They’re kinda useless — remember that thing you searched for days ago, lets display an advert for it on a news article I might test it though with Incognito
/r/MensRights31/03/23 08:57 PM
9

Has the same avatar as Knowledge81 and Debate1500 — two other trolls
/r/MensRights31/03/23 06:58 PM
5

Has the Minster for Equalities been changed back to the Minster for Women’s Equality? Right after the current PM was appointed that was one of the changes. There were a few newspapers complaining about it Edit: Regardless, I don’t think they’ll be any other changes. On a policy level nothing has changed. It’s just gotten worse Edit2: https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers/minister-of-state-minister-for-equalities
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/23 06:53 PM
5

We’ve destroyed someone’s life. Whoopsie daisy 🤷‍♂️ /s
/r/MensRights26/03/23 08:47 PM
7

The same person seems to have created another account — Debate1500. Very original Edit: Scroll down: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/121stga/notice_anything_about_the_incoming_2023_stanford/jdogx7m/
/r/MensRights26/03/23 01:04 AM
1

You’re straw arguing and trying to get the previous poster to agree to something on your terms That reference isn’t US centric. It’s a UK reference
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:56 PM
2

So you’re defending OP by saying « well you guys do it too », while saying it is wrong? Can’t you admit that OP is also wrong? Hello Cathy Newman
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:47 PM
1

You dumped on men in the past — as if they were the cause of ‘toxic’ masculinity. People had to deal with the hand they were given. I suppose you could define it as there’s multiple definitions I don’t get how you can view 2x as a view of the other side and view men’s rights — the subreddit — as becoming as hateful as MGTOW (your words) I’ll take something you wrote and alter it slightly: Obviously there are members on 2x that truly do hate men… I’ve read some pretty hateful stuff over there
/r/MensRights25/03/23 07:51 PM
1

Remember you wrote our in your OP as if you’re part of the MRM? Your post history is public, how can you be for men’s rights when you post in againstmensrights?
/r/MensRights25/03/23 07:21 PM
3

That whole hissy fit did it for me. I don’t remember what it was over. She just kept doubling down over it and posting more mocking videos
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/23 10:21 PM
1

They made fun more times they’ve actually said anything positive On those occasions they’ve done their crybaby routine and sometimes KK makes a caveat. I think that’s the reason I unsubscribed But it’s right, they’ve interviewed some pretty bad feminists on there. Julie Bindel was probably the worst — she’s a misandrist so… The only thing you can gain from watching them is just how insidious they can be and how removed they are from the topic
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/23 10:17 PM
1

There’s multiple started by different people, going by the news Edit: Yes, it’s possible there could be a subreddit. I found a Facebook group for London
/r/MensRights22/03/23 12:35 AM
1

But this is like saying a dating website loses 230 protections from what people put in their profiles, just because the website focuses on dating. I’m not sure why you’re using that as an example. It’s a Facebook group with the sole purpose posting photos of men to see if anyone has any information regardless of factuality A profile is individualistic. This isn’t
/r/MensRights22/03/23 12:03 AM
3

I don’t know much or anything about IDW but thank you for elaborating
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/23 08:43 PM
3

You remember posting this? But that just means we need more diverse and active leftist men present. You don’t know what my opinion is to base anything on
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/23 07:42 PM
4

A whole room of caucasian men can be diverse IDW = intellectual dark web Edit: Added a qualifier (men)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/23 01:27 AM
1

I asked you to provide another example. Please go ahead and do that Until you do, I shall not respond
/r/MensRights20/03/23 03:29 AM
1

Your whole thing is that extreme women's rights groups are damaging male victims of IPV, do you really believe an apparent 6-fold increase of extreme men's rights groups has had no effect on that the other way? Maybe you want a reminder of what’s actually written in the article It comes as analysis earlier this year found a six-fold rise in UK web traffic to websites promoting incel culture. Edit: I should also point out you’re being disingenuous. Extreme women’s groups? You just defined Women’s…
/r/MensRights20/03/23 03:09 AM
2

You mean terms that have been pushed on the public by the media? Probably the first instance the overwhelming public first heard the term, was in connection to a murderer. The usage by the police serves no purpose other than to further cement the word as only meaning bad man bad, hates women I dare you to give another example — and don’t go on some tangent.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 02:48 AM
3

Or part-time clubs that are mainly used for abodes. I don’t think Working Men’s Clubs were limited to men. They’ve always included women and children — families, by extension. The only thing I’m unsure of is if they still require a membership to use the club It’s Gentlemen’s Clubs that only allowed men. Pretty much all of those allow woman admittance if their husbands are members and some allow women to be members
/r/MensRights19/03/23 01:54 AM
65

You’re right, it doesn’t and yes, it just means involuntarily abstaining from sex. The reasons could be anything from disability, social anxiety or, personal circumstances The original meaning has been twisted. Instead of referring to misogynists as misogynists they’ve just tacked on those to incel Edit: Spelling (involuntary to involuntarily)
/r/MensRights18/03/23 08:12 PM
2

Small devices or tags for tracking. These particular ones are by Apple Edit: They work in a similar manner to Title
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:00 AM
1

URL needs changing. You have to put np at the start of it — i.e. https://np.reddit.com/rest-of-the-url Edit: I’m wrong read this: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/11s0z8h/a_reminder_do_not_harass_other_users_brigade/
/r/MensRights18/03/23 02:32 AM
2

If anyone is wondering about this. It’s probably due to a protest in Sydney by someone called Kellie-Jay Keen (Posie Parker). The usual Twits have been going on about how MRAS, or whatever, support terfs Personally, I don’t like Kellie-Jay Keen and wouldn’t support her She’s the same person who rented a billboard and used it to display the definition for woman
/r/MensRights18/03/23 01:42 AM
3

I don't think any movement should be defined by its weakest links. Just look at Andrew Tate and his enablers. The punchline here is even @takedownmras hasn’t stooped that low — by trying to tie Tate to the MRM
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/23 01:22 AM
15

I wouldn’t put much weight to it. The percentages are too high across the board If I was contacted by a feminist organisation I’m not sure how I’d answer. Especially if it goes down the route of if you’re for equality then by extension you must be a feminist. It’s a partisan organisation The route of least resistance is the to agree with whatever you’ve been asked Unless I missed it, it isn’t indicated the source of the pool. The people who were asked those questions. If they’re to be reflective…
/r/MensRights17/03/23 07:18 PM
1

Sorry, I meant more there’s a antagonistic mod over there. For whatever reasons she didn’t post anything to that post I was subscribed to several feminist subreddits. I had to unsubscribe from all of them due to how it was affecting my mental health. There were a few insanely bad posts. So I kinda get you on that point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/23 06:39 PM
4

They’d be going against their own definition. They’d probably classify this subreddit as male supremacy
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/23 03:43 PM
6

Probably gonna need some definitions. Who or what is the alt-right? Originally the term alt-right was a alternative right and since then it’s been tied to the people who are framed as being basically bad I thought it died a death years ago when there was a leaked recording of a ethno-nationalist It’s a label that’s tied to anyone deemed as being non-progressive, going against the grain or, just cause So what is alt-right and who are these models within it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/23 02:31 PM
10

I’m more surprised a certain person didn’t leave a witty retort about the OP or the subject
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/23 12:34 AM
2

I just replied with that because the previous poster gendered it
/r/MensRights15/03/23 06:42 PM
2

I’m pretty sure she knows but doesn’t care. You’d have to find out whether or not that’s the case before trying to fix something.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 06:38 PM
2

It hurts victims
/r/MensRights15/03/23 06:32 PM
2

"Cumbria Police [conducted] a really good investigation and brought someone to justice for what they did. We need to move on from that and recognise this is just a one-off*. "Ninety-nine per cent of complainants are genuine*. What we need to do is investigate properly and ensure [cases] are brought to court and people are prosecuted. Kinda ironic given his position back in 2012 and the topic. Nothing will change
/r/MensRights15/03/23 06:31 PM
9

Satire took a shotgun blast to the kneecaps
/r/MensRights15/03/23 12:45 AM
13

Didn’t even read the article. Gosh golly. The article outlines the steps his wife took to collect evidence that contradicts the false allegations Edit: The resident troll has a new account. Yay Edit2: Reworded
/r/MensRights13/03/23 01:34 AM
3

Single quotes are usually used for quotations. But it’s only being used for a single word and the Judge didn’t use the word abusive and at the end of the article they switch to double quotations when quoting a PC
/r/MensRights12/03/23 12:55 AM
2

I'll just address this point: How did "recursion" get in there? On one hand, you've got by definition and on the other, you've got a prerequisite in becoming the definition. I just see a real man as being man man. It's recursion with the potential to having more levels. If to be the definition you have to perform more steps, would a real man become a real, real man, or man man man? To be come the definition you'd to have to provide something in the form of an action or provide a belief which mak…
/r/MensRights11/03/23 04:00 PM
1

Yeah, I agree when the crutches were seen she changed her tune. But at the start of the video they’re looking at him suggesting the tap on the shoulder wasn’t the first attempt in asking him to move It isn’t the first time I’ve watched it. That was what I originally thought when I first watched it I wouldn’t really subscribe it to real man. That’s just recursion
/r/MensRights11/03/23 01:54 AM
3

Just wait until there’s a similar bill for England. Parliament will probably just copy it and integrate it with an existing law
/r/MensRights11/03/23 01:40 AM
5

What did the other guy say? That’s what I’m basing my premise on. Maybe it’s a stretch. I suppose I could have used the word guilt tripped into giving up the seat
/r/MensRights11/03/23 01:27 AM
35

No, he’s a man that was forced to give up his seat. In an equal world she can stand on the bus
/r/MensRights11/03/23 12:54 AM
1

It’s asking me to either login or create an account
/r/MensRights11/03/23 12:22 AM
1

What’s with the corporate speak? Are you a bot? Beep boop bop?
/r/MensRights09/03/23 01:25 AM
2

How well did your post go in r/feminism? 😂
/r/MensRights08/03/23 10:21 PM
20

Just sort of clicked. It's: ViSOR is limited to sexual crimes. The proposal will extent it to domestic violence, including non-violent related crimes. Meaning those who've been to prison for domestic violence will be on a register alongside those who've been convicted of sexual crimes and will fall under the reporting framework of ViSOR (laid out from S80 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003) I should really be a separate register. I feel so fucking dim
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/23 02:37 AM
2

It’s probably how little interest there’s in the audiobook One can only assume it didn’t sell well. There aren’t many copies in the wild and Penguin dropped it from their library
/r/MensRights05/03/23 07:37 PM
1

The whole premise of this is wrong. The claim she made was it happened when she was writing the forth Harry Potter book. So that’d put this around 1998-1999. Also that it was a chatroom — not a forum — and was told — vaguely — she doesn’t know anything It’s most likely just an effort to self-promote. Or I suppose, it could be another case of retconning the story
/r/MensRights05/03/23 07:16 PM
3

There just seems to be a copy on Amazon and one on eBay (for $95). The ISBN 10 seems to be: 0143058460 Checked usual services
/r/MensRights05/03/23 04:33 PM
3

By implication. Pedophilia is an illegal act. I separated the two and added the distinction. I may not agree with it but he’s free to date women of that age
/r/MensRights04/03/23 08:36 PM
4

Actually no. If that’s the basis of your argument, you are wrong She’s legally an adult. Him dating someone of her age maybe classified as being immoral but it isn’t illegal And me responding to you in that manner was how you improperly used words. Pedophile actually has a set meaning. That’s a child that’s prepubescent You’ve got no idea what her consent consisted of and to what extent. You’re treating it as if DiCaprio just pointed at her then proclaimed “We’re in a relationship now because I …
/r/MensRights04/03/23 08:24 PM
5

Stop using words improperly, you absolute fuckface Edit: Almost forgot: You’ve got no argument
/r/MensRights04/03/23 08:15 PM
6

Lets back this up a bit. You're building this on a lot of shaky ground. First off, you're assuming a lot about the women he's dating. That they're naive and he's dating them solely due to this naivety. So he can use and abuse them That's actually pretty ageist and sexist As for this response, the previous poster didn't mean that. If you want the short version: Someone took issue with DiCaprio dating someone much younger than himself, potentially by a sexist hypocrite, which then was just parrote…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 08:11 PM
3

How many times are you going to reply with the same shit?
/r/MensRights04/03/23 01:44 AM
5

OP you’re being dubious af
/r/MensRights04/03/23 12:45 AM
5

The biggest problem with this was, it overshadowed the event. The police were hoping to secure funding for a building/project dubbed the bunker. The guy who did the dad joke was there on the pro-side — think his daughter had substance abuse issues and the police helped. After he spoke he left and spoke to a group of people. Initially the person filming had an issue with the camera crew only filming the pro side and approached ‘Hugh Mungus’ to get his name After this happened, she produced a seri…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 03:26 AM
1

Heck, they have problems just putting on the right, matching shoes
/r/MensRights02/03/23 02:42 AM
1

Yeah, I didn’t get the qualifiers. I think it could be boiled down to the right has expectations for men and the left treats men as a group void of consideration and part of the problem
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/23 12:36 AM
1

What makes men’s rights right wing?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/23 12:16 AM
1

It’s much worse than that. This is what the article references: https://www.judiciary.uk/about-the-judiciary/diversity/equal-treatment-bench-book/
/r/MensRights28/02/23 01:33 AM
-1

Then there needs to be truthful discourse — there’s too much shaming and too many lies
/r/MensRights28/02/23 01:04 AM
1

You’d have to pick whichever programming language. If it’s PHP you’d probably have to use OOP — classes, objects and, methods Usually those documents are in PDF format, so you’d either need a parser or you’d have to directly input the data Then that data is compared with a dictionary-like array with scores attached so the overall score can be calculated No, I don’t have the programming knowledge, for something on this level. I might ask ChatGPT for a potential solution (if I get a viable solutio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/23 08:18 PM
1

I don’t know the context, but that’s a reference to some photos of Bernie Sanders apparently in first class on a plane
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/23 07:24 PM
3

All I can think of is Duffman: Duffman takes Simpman's girl
/r/MensRights21/02/23 11:46 PM
119

Also the name and photo. Here’s some other Tweets: Just learned there was a chemical attack in East Palestine? Is there no low Israel won't stoop to?! I like how we have all these diverse characters but we're going with yet another boring white dude in the starring role I'm not sexist, and I believe it's what's on the inside that counts, but I don't interact with girls who are under 6/10. They don't have anything I want so I don't see any reason for us to interact. Edit: Trolls both sides
/r/MensRights20/02/23 12:28 AM
338

That’s gotta be a troll. Look at the username — gamerdudeguy69 Edit: It’s a parody account
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:57 PM
2

You cherry picked the point about harassment, ignored the point about sexual assault and further declared that you doubted rape even happened. I'm not the previous poster so I've got no idea where you got that from. The statistics are skewed due to harassment being added to them and no, I am not cherry picking you fuck On the one hand I don't deny a woman without kids can run faster. On the other it does not mean she can outrun the typical man. You don't even remember wtf you wrote. You mentione…
/r/MensRights19/02/23 07:59 PM
14

Hair splitting? You pulled a Strawman and now you’re misconstruing something to be hair splitting. Harassment shouldn’t have been on the list. Yes, it’s insignificant to the rest and all this boils down to is feeling safe. It isn’t actually direct action to tackle it and most of your points you tied to women, would actually be helped with family parking spots
/r/MensRights19/02/23 03:14 AM
1

Words can have multiple. I looked up the definition beforehand before replying to you and the claim of deflection was based on multiple replies of yours
/r/MensRights13/02/23 12:27 PM
2

Deflection? You’ve always assumed the worst. Fumbling includes verbal — i.e. Ted fumbled with his words
/r/MensRights13/02/23 12:44 AM
2

You’ve got no idea wtf they are being accused of. Everything you’ve stated is based on an assumption like the previous poster. You’ve got nothing
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:39 PM
16

You wrote so much but conveyed so very little and oh yeah, phrasing
/r/MensRights12/02/23 05:08 PM
1

Political gayism? Other than no, I’m unsure what I can actually write here that won’t get me banned
/r/MensRights12/02/23 03:32 PM
9

Putting aside “men created sexism”, name some of these horrible things
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/23 07:56 PM
1

I meant she. I’m unsure what sex the OP is. But the conversation is between the OP and their dad
/r/MensRights10/02/23 01:59 AM
2

Typo?
/r/MensRights10/02/23 01:54 AM
4

It’s odd. When you compare what’s written with the response it’s almost a Rorschach test. They’re reading into it and adding things that aren’t there. That’s a story of a regular teenager and the world around him is becoming hostile towards him If you took the formula and applied it to a news article it’d be click bait (the title doesn’t match the content). That’s the only conclusion I can come to since the alternative is whoever wrote is must be delusional given what he wrote had no bearing on …
/r/MensRights10/02/23 01:48 AM
2

If you mean subservient, yeah, that’s how it’s always framed. It focuses just on external forces and excludes anything that’s untoward others (like bullying, gossiping, snippy remarks and, judging — note these aren’t exclusive to women) Women are social animals and have a great amount of influence over society — as opposed to society just fell on women, were largely excluded and, we’re expected to put up with it Edit: This gym thing reminds me of an episode of The Cabinet of Curiosities
/r/MensRights09/02/23 02:24 AM
5

Yeah, deal those Uno Straw Argument cards
/r/MensRights08/02/23 09:38 PM
2

The bishop’s comments came in response to a question asked at synod by the Rev Joanna Stobart, vicar of Ilminster and Whitelackington in Somerset, about the progress on developing “more inclusive language” in services.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 08:19 PM
8

The Pence rule is to do with rumours. There’s a whole lot more history behind it. It’s to limit the avenues someone can use to spread rumours If Pence had dined with someone other than his wife, he’d have left himself open to anyone to make rumours claiming he’s having an affair And no, it’s to limit the possibility of false accusations. You put in certain rules so you’re not left alone with someone, so it isn’t your word against someone else because any accusation will always be placed above it
/r/MensRights08/02/23 08:08 PM
1

You mean nihilists? They’ve given up. I’m not sure they’d make up his audience. Red pillers are more likely and maybe PUAs
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/23 06:32 PM
1

So, yes, of course, when society shits on you, you become desperate, and you will pick up whatever kind of moral support you can find. If that's in relation to boys watching Tate videos, there's nothing to back that up. All that's happening is they've got someone they can't point to and blame for an existential crisis of their making ..well that's a step up from just saying men are all bad I guess. Amoral or in need of de-programming Feminism created incels. Tate? The Alt-Right? They just have t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/23 10:00 PM
1

You're missing the point
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/23 09:47 PM
2

I have no idea. Some people are weird. I had one I disagreed with and I was blocked within minutes
/r/MensRights06/02/23 07:42 PM
7

They’ve blocked you. Whilst logged in try to view their profile and you’ll get a not found error It’s happened to me a few times
/r/MensRights06/02/23 07:37 PM
8

Because that’s directly against the rules of the court. Sorry, I meant in this instance. As far as I thought it one of the main punishments was prison for non-payment of child support
/r/MensRights05/02/23 03:43 AM
1

If you’re going to pretend that men don’t make fun of women constantly for being overly emotional then you need to touch grass Do you mean some men or all men? The usage of men is specific to the authors intent, so I'm unsure which of those you mean. Though to answer your question, I haven't heard a single man outside of fiction say that. Maybe I've met a man who has said that in his lifetime, but I wasn't there to witness the dreaded act To be honest, I've heard women be more sexist towards men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/23 02:41 AM
1

Why are you treating individuals as having traits that are universal. You may know someone who’s used those words but they’ll be others who haven’t And in your case, I’m not sure it fits your criteria. Maybe you cut out some details and you’re not just going because a man said that it must because it was against a woman
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/23 01:56 AM
2

That makes a lot more sense than the list I read on Urban
/r/MensRights05/02/23 01:04 AM
0

Horrible straw argument
/r/MensRights05/02/23 12:58 AM
11

Expensive child. Got any cheaper ones?
/r/MensRights05/02/23 12:42 AM
12

How can you be imprisoned for a civil dispute?
/r/MensRights05/02/23 12:42 AM
1

It’s taken as being true because their membership was cancelled and if there’s no police action taken, it must mean victims aren’t being taken seriously
/r/MensRights04/02/23 03:43 PM
1

Yeah, not sure if it’s in general or specific to that extremely annoying last one
/r/MensRights04/02/23 03:39 PM
39

Maybe you forgot your membership being cancelled and possible fallouts from being posted online When it comes to work, all it could take is your employer receiving a complaint. It wouldn’t take much for HR to fire someone then it’s a house of cards. Your whole life could fall apart from that point. More so if you’re married and paying for a mortgage
/r/MensRights04/02/23 01:43 AM
2

The only one I could find was from a month ago and that was about getting banned from Twitter ( https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/zuwv1w/got_banned_from_twitter_for_hateful_conduct_just/) A while back think there were number of posts on AskMen and 2x and one or two of those were screenshot and posted here
/r/MensRights25/01/23 08:57 PM
2

https://12ft.io/proxy?&q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kxly.com%2Fwa-males-account-for-80-of-suicides-in-the-state-among-other-troublingly-disproportionate-trends
/r/MensRights23/01/23 12:02 AM
1

It could be on the basis of I’m a woman. Woman are good. I’m a representation of women as a whole
/r/MensRights22/01/23 11:50 PM
3

Read until the end. There’s a switch. Odd thing though, I’ve found the blog and potentially the blog entry in question, but it doesn’t have the ‘advice’ the article claims In might see if there’s an archive *Edit: Found it: (such as, don’t allow a lone policeman to approach you, at any time. A reminder: it’s 2023). http://whs-blogs.co.uk/heads-blog/2023/01/17/dont-tell-me-girls-schools-are-no-longer-relevant/ The switch: She clarified that she was "not suggesting for a moment that girls don't tr…
/r/MensRights20/01/23 07:19 PM
3

Yeah, because saying no worked out so well Edit: I’m pretty sure the OP said that — said he’s married
/r/MensRights20/01/23 06:14 PM
4

Pretty much. It’s gotten to the extent of any form of abuse is either excused due to dynamics or it’s twisted around and framed as she was really the victim (DARVO-esk)
/r/MensRights06/01/23 10:43 PM
2

Didn't get banned until I posted a reply to r/dating. Don't recall I ever received a notification about the r/offmychest ban. I only found out when I tried to post a comment. Think I've been banned from one further subreddit but there's no mass form of checking for bans. You'd have to go through each subreddit on a deaktop/use desktop view
/r/MensRights04/01/23 06:29 PM
2

Usually with these types of posts you'll get supposed circumcised men complaining and stating they've had no problems
/r/MensRights31/12/22 09:50 PM
1

It was nothing to do with undermining your intelligence. This is part of a mentality which you seem to be fine with. You could have asked me to clarify my point This is viewing anyone as a potential murderer. It isn't just simply pulling out a hair and leaving it in the back of a car -- which I should point out can be removed and you keep forgetting there's already a freaking paper trail I know they are real and dangerous. Women need to be cautious, it’s an unfortunate fact of the world we live …
/r/MensRights25/12/22 02:56 AM
3

I just asked you to look up a definition
/r/MensRights24/12/22 12:50 AM
6

Maybe you could look up mentality.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 12:41 AM
2

Straw argument
/r/MensRights18/12/22 09:14 PM
2

Heh, I’m not sure what I can put other than it’s your personality and patronising tone
/r/MensRights18/12/22 12:46 AM
1

On mobile all I could find was this: https://redditvids.com/v/zmg1y4 The videos have been delisted
/r/MensRights17/12/22 03:59 AM
3

If we choose to not finally get off this dead end cause, and concentrate our fire on causes where the evidence is already solidly in our favor I prefer to just downvote you and move on There's no we, no our
/r/MensRights17/12/22 03:56 AM
2

Oops, replied to the wrong reply… I don’t know where kind came from, the striking up a conversation came from he saw someone reading study material and was presumably interested in the subject
/r/MensRights06/12/22 02:17 AM
6

This isn't the original source. OP most likely reposted it for karma. It happened back in Feb and some outlets picked up the story The Texas resident told TODAY Food that her daughter, who wishes to remain anonymous, was studying by herself at a Starbucks in Corpus Christi on a Saturday night. “She wanted to get out of the house and go sit and study somewhere. She likes to go study at coffee shops,” she wrote in an email. https://www.today.com/food/trends/starbucks-cup-note-teen-girl-rcna17057 h…
/r/MensRights05/12/22 11:06 PM
4

I don’t know where kind came from, the striking up a conversation came from he saw someone reading study material and was presumably interested in the subject
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:33 PM
8

Bonk straight to jail
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:27 PM
6

There isn’t enough information to come to that conclusion (or what the guy did to receive such a response)
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:17 PM
3

The only thing stated in the article he’s accused of doing, is being overly animated because he saw someone studying a certain subject in a cafe so approached and tried to strike up a conversation Me personally, my issue is more with the response to it and the note
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:05 PM
38

I just went on Quora and saw this on my feed. It was posted in Oct but it happened back in Feb. There's either loads of bots on there or loads who don't understand what happened -- a few are demotivating Link to the original article: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10536543/Starbucks-barista-wrote-secret-message-cup-girl-18-pestered-stranger.html
/r/MensRights05/12/22 01:18 AM
1

I didn’t state you did. That was was something I would use instead
/r/MensRights02/12/22 05:31 PM
0

“You taught me, you’re a good teacher.” What you stated could be considered patronising
/r/MensRights02/12/22 04:44 PM
9

And he didn't just bleed, he died then came back to life and he was ran out of his village
/r/MensRights01/12/22 07:25 PM
5

The scheme is a partnership between the Rail Delivery [snip] It's a scheme to help women flee from their abusers. Neither case you mentioned are relevant -- the first case is tragic and I really don't get why you mentioned the second one. This is specific to domestic violence. It's how it's framed. White Ribbon doesn't just exclude men as victims, it demonises them and places the entire issue on them. It's a sexist organisation That's probably the case with the rest of the NGOs that are part of …
/r/MensRights26/11/22 01:44 AM
4

Teacher misconduct panel outcome: Ms Keeley Dean: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/teacher-misconduct-panel-outcome-ms-keeley-dean
/r/MensRights21/11/22 11:32 PM
33

Person in question: https://youtube.com/shorts/0c9tKlDa4Nw
/r/MensRights21/11/22 01:20 AM
4

https://i.imgur.com/1ZWwYPo_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium
/r/MensRights21/11/22 12:40 AM
288

Look at that subtle off-white coloring. The tasteful thickness of it. Oh my God... it even has a watermark.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 11:48 AM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/justneckbeardthings/comments/yz1crj/neckbeards_always_existed/
/r/MensRights20/11/22 11:44 AM
2

The better argument is, the preface is written by Elsie — an American journalist — supports an argument in an anonymous letter It’s full of hyperbole and dated vernacular. It’d still be dubious as you’d have glossed over it’s about women trying to control men’s relationships There’s even a part in the screenshot in which the anonymous author of the letter writes how men have to explain to their partner when one of his friends is a woman, how he knows her and how they became acquainted
/r/MensRights20/11/22 11:32 AM
5

Yeah, sorry
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/22 02:50 AM
9

It’s already been posted to r/unitedkingdom. It’s a bit of a shit show Edit: Well, a link Cosmopolitan article about it: https://np.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/yye36j/men_have_to_change_the_attitudes_of_their_gender/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/22 02:34 AM
6

I don't agree with anything written on that page. It's treating people differently based on their sex. I was just browsing through their website when I spotted this section under About Us. The section entitled "Why aren't we a ‘men’s rights’ campaign?" has been been sneaked in under this: We provide a national online helpline, individual and group counselling for boys, men and non-binary people aged 13+ who have experienced sexual violence at any time in their lives. We also offer emotional supp…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 09:12 PM
1

In real life, on Netflix, whatever That's a bit of a silly argument. For me, if it was Netflix it'd probably be Dahmer then Day Shift. If it was whatever, that'd probably be a video of a US police officer shooting an armed subject (who was trying to stab a woman) then a video of a Brazilian woman shooting a man in the back Swiping on videos can be fun to horrifying in one swipe Men do more damage when they are violent. Perhaps because of this most men tend to be quite reserved in their use of vi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/22 09:56 PM
12

There’s been some consequences. Personally, it’s made me skeptic of the media. It’s come at the cost of journalistic integrity But there’s probably been an element of that. I vaguely remember reading articles about Justice4Fathers and noticed the articles always focused on one person in particular instead of what the group was about
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 08:06 PM
10

I'd be wary of assuming that this capture of geek spaces has been a failure. It comes down to what your point of focus is to judge whether or not it's been a success or a failure. If the goal was social change that's happened at a cost. It's created so much division. It's a new audience against the old [audience] You'll note the official line on gamergate is still that it was a harrassment campaign and not a reasonable response to journalists geting into bed [literally] with game designers. That…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 07:47 PM
17

I’ve seen much worse on those two subs. What the previous poster linked to is weak in comparison
/r/MensRights12/11/22 03:33 PM
6

it’s doubtful that 6 more hours mattered to his condition. Could you please stop missing out the ten hours. I keep staring he was held in the back of a police car
/r/MensRights11/11/22 02:21 AM
8

If he had been seen at a hospital exactly 2 days after he was shot he could have been saved, but two days plus 6 hours cost him his life He lived for a further nine years. That happened in Dec 2006, he died in Feb 2016 If you meant metaphorically, well he did have brain damage and lost his sight due to the location of the bullets. That may have been avoided if he was given medical attention way earlier -- he was held in the back of a police car for some hours on top of the six hour interview Is …
/r/MensRights11/11/22 02:06 AM
40

He had several bullet holes in his head
/r/MensRights10/11/22 09:27 PM
1

Sorry, was trying to explain my initial response and the possible reason behind the downvotes I'd be more than happy to answer every question you might have and to clarify anything that perhaps sounded wrong. Probably the part about abortion
/r/MensRights10/11/22 02:11 AM
3

I’ll put it down to lost in translation. A few of your points in literal terms are somewhat sore spots on here
/r/MensRights09/11/22 09:24 PM
11

You downvoted yourself. As much as I disagree with that post and the repetition there’s some truth to it Whenever men and rapists are conflated it’s treated as if men are amoral and it’s a behaviour intrinsic to being male that must be unlearnt The only part I agree with that is, allow men to say they’ve been victims of sexual abuse. I’d add essentially services since the vast majority are seemingly tied to one sex I’m not sure what perspective the op would give if the perpetrator was a woman, b…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 09:21 PM
3

Why though -- who is this list for? a. guilty until proven innocent The justice system shouldn't work like that In practice, you see a pregnant gal telling the Judge that some guy is the Father of the child, since they were together in a party. She shows the Judge some photos, tells him a sob story. Guess who's obligated now to pay pregnant pension? Going by what else you wrote there doesn't have to be any evidence submitted. It's on word alone that this theoretical guy has no defence against We…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 08:33 PM
1

It’s a term mostly none men have come up with to associate us with each other I'm assuming none is a typo. You're gonna have to expand on that -- associate us? It's an umbrella term that encompasses so much it's neigh on pointless to use The usage is probably similar to incel. It's how the word is used not what information is conveyed. It's been poisoned to the extent its usage is tied to the worse aspects it's used to describe People explore ideas and ideologies, especially younger people. Peop…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/22 07:52 PM
-1

If you've read through the posts there it's easy enough to work out which mod it is
/r/MensRights05/11/22 08:23 PM
1

Think this appeared on my newsfeed a few days ago. Thought I must have misremembered it as I thought it couldn't get worse and the advice was basically pointless You're acting on something you don't even know is an issue because of your sex -- don't stand too close, if you're walking in the same direction cross the road, etc Nevermind... just remembered some news articles from about 15-16 months ago and the resulting response I saw/read on Facebook Her fears, it turned out, were all to do with t…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 10:10 PM
8

Hello Psychology Today...
/r/MensRights30/10/22 02:46 AM
12

Men were speaking up back during #metoo but were told they were taking the spotlight off women. So #metoo was used instead and the message didn't change (you're taking the spotlight off women) But yeah, it's all fine and dandy until the wrong person falls foul of laws
/r/MensRights29/10/22 05:11 PM
1

I wasn’t attempting to water down the men’s issue. I didn't mean you specifically, I meant that's one of the arguments that's usually used whenever male suicide is brought up My point was that's one of the points that's brought up and you used it Men unfortunately opt on average for a more lethal method of suicide, which is why their stats are so high. This is another talking point. Can even go as far as men are amoral and don't care about the state they leave their bodies (again, not directed a…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 09:13 PM
1

No worries 🙂
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/22 08:50 PM
23

If that subreddit just vanished and everyone who knew about it just collectively forgot it ever existed men's rights would be treated in a similar fashion. Nothing would be different Outside of Reddit, very little focus is given to r/mensrights
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/22 08:46 PM
51

While she should be remembered for her positive stance on male issues and rights, don't idolise her too much. She was pretty transphobic throughout her life No, all you've got is, is a quote she made twenty-one years ago. People can and do change. This is a bit like digging up old tweets. But it has taken the likes of Foucault, Derrida, and their imitators to kill something that is, arguably, far more precious. Namely, the self. And that, I submit, is what the rise of transsexuality indicates, o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/22 08:37 PM
5

https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/yfic96/comment/iu3tnix/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/22 07:51 PM
4

You're a troll, 'arry
/r/MensRights28/10/22 02:12 AM
3

It's late so I'll have to read through this later. Though it seems you're making the argument those who self-harm commit suicide at a higher rate You'll have to excuse me, but if the vast majority of suicides are made up of one sex then under the argument they'd receive the bulk of the attention for suicide prevention My issue with your reply was you focused on a self-funded group then brought up women attempt suicide more, the latter is usually used to divert/water down any discussion Going fro…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 02:11 AM
5

Many voices claim that it is a satire account. Second link is probably better. The claims I read on that post were it was posted by a man for rage-bait purposes https://www.reddit.com/r/TIHI/comments/yevmxm/thanks_i_hate_extremism/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ThatsInsane/comments/yeo0ms/feminism_ultra_pro_max/
/r/MensRights28/10/22 01:53 AM
3

You did notice the subject matter, yes? Also, you know it's a debate, right? The subject is patriarchy You snowflakes are so upset and I don’t understand why. Nobody is tone policing, just making dummies look dumb In case you forgot: Why you so triggered mate?
/r/MensRights28/10/22 01:38 AM
6

Well, Andy’s Man Club exists As far as I know, that's self-funded and it isn't an NGO -- they'd have to apply to the Charities Commission. Think I posted a interview video Despite the fact that women and girls attempt suicide 1.5 - 2 times more often than boys and men. The dead can't commit suicide. That's repeated too often. Do those figures include self-harm and what's the source of the claim? Edit: The dead can't re-attempt suicide*
/r/MensRights28/10/22 01:33 AM
2

You did notice the subject matter, yes? Also, you know it's a debate, right? You actually formulate an argument before a debate so you have an argument based on your position, mate Why you so triggered mate? Tone policing? Seriously? You over use that, mate
/r/MensRights28/10/22 01:16 AM
1

I’m just curious as to why I have never come across an advert for men, instead of women. Closest is probably a series of posters about coercive control. They were posted every so often to social media. They had males as victims They may have been retired as occasionally arguments would breakout in the comments. Though I've been deactivating my Facebook account, on and off, so no idea how often they've been posted recently
/r/MensRights28/10/22 01:08 AM
1

Weird. Thought no-nut November was a Imgur thing
/r/MensRights28/10/22 12:55 AM
6

The point is equality. You can't treat it as a buffet. Choosing all the good stuff and ignoring stuff you don't like. Like paying for your own drinks and food It's outdated. Why should a man pay for that stuff?
/r/MensRights25/10/22 09:48 PM
3

Or just approaching. You're supposed to be psychic and know before you approach a woman if she wants to be approached
/r/MensRights25/10/22 06:28 PM
13

Yeah, because it broke the Equality Act 2010. Treating men different in comparison to women
/r/MensRights25/10/22 06:13 PM
21

A strong independent woman can buy her own drinks and food
/r/MensRights25/10/22 06:12 PM
1

Fuck women being attracted to them, boys who learn healthy ways of dealing with their emotions are just going to be happier. But you're not teaching others how to respond to men and boys. You're placing the whole emphasis on them to express emotions when out in the real world those responses will be ignored That'll will overshadow anything they've been taught about expressing their feelings. When you can express your feelings but there's no one who'll listen
/r/MensRights25/10/22 01:54 AM
1

The curfew, as far as I saw, was a snippy response to the flood of people (mostly men) You're quoting the Baroness? The response I noticed was, "We can't even go out during the daytime"
/r/MensRights25/10/22 01:45 AM
19

Maybe you missed the one the patient made
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:49 AM
2

But when she arrived on October 6 for her clinical pre-op assessment, which involved intimate procedures, what appeared to be a transgender man in a blonde wig and make-up opened the door and made eye contact with her. She's just standing there menacingly Emma told MailOnline: 'I began to wonder if it was just a coincidence that this member of staff with a "gender identity" had made their presence felt to me in such an inappropriate way during my first visit. Paranoia -- this information is down…
/r/MensRights19/10/22 08:37 PM
1

But would mentioning that help with the petition -- being allowed on the site and getting signatures The weirdest thing with that nutter is, she's stated why and where that definition comes from. It's the legal one. It's either the biggest troll or a huge fail What I meant is, if it's a widely held belief why focus on one small demographic. When you could expand that and even quote the response to one of the previous petitions You try and make the refer people realise it's a gendered law. Edit:
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:43 AM
13

Feminist mad at gender neutral domestic violence bill - still is in the parliament Think this is the bill in question: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/domestic-abuse-bill Also found this (checked the above, couldn't see it listed): https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5801/cmpublic/DomesticAbuse/memo/DAB62.htm
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:36 AM
3

The law is being misused. Gender-critical feminists point to the gendered definition to say "Women can't be rapists" and "Not our crimes". Bit of a moot point. It's a widely held belief. Essentially it's a two-tier system. Treating victims based on the sex of their rapist
/r/MensRights17/10/22 08:56 PM
7

I'm assuming not. I tried to find info on sentencing and found this: https://www.sentencingcouncil.vic.gov.au/snapshots/255-rape
/r/MensRights16/10/22 04:22 PM
11

Two years prison sentence
/r/MensRights16/10/22 03:57 PM
2

https://www.reveddit.com/y/ChimpPimp20/ Edit: They've must have been approved. Edit2: I meant this one (it states that comment is missing): https://np.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/y18mjf/the_left_doesnt_know_how_to_appeal_to_men/is8lju9/?context=3 Can't find the comment on Reveddit. Could have sworn I read it on there last night on mobile Had to switch to desktop: https://www.reveddit.com/v/AskFeminists/comments/y18mjf/the_left_doesnt_know_how_to_appeal_to_men/is8lju9/?context=3
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/22 12:35 PM
1

Yeah, think I've read a few replies stating as such. Sorry, I meant the book Men Who Hate Women Edit: Stating whatever the opposite of a recommendation is*
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/22 12:27 AM
1

Thanks. I've seen loads of those replies but thought it was related to the Kermit tea meme
/r/MensRights14/10/22 11:49 PM
14

Yes, that's been deleted. I had to use Reveddit just so I could read it in full context When I was doing that, I saw loads of replies you had left on r/menslib had been deleted
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/22 11:18 PM
1

A lot of mras i've talked to consume typical right wing talking points Clarify -- what are these points and why are you tying them to the right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/22 10:46 PM
9

Got to r/menslib r/AskFeminists is probably more your bag -- that's recommended reading over there
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/22 10:42 PM
15

That comment was removed Edit: Both* Do you have any idea how many of your replies to posts on r/menslib have been automatically removed?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/22 10:28 PM
1

But if you flip it around, that's literally what hundreds of organisations do to men And blame men for it -- like the abuse they've faced
/r/MensRights14/10/22 08:50 PM
0

That's similar over here. You have these NGOs who'll help to rehouse them but they don't address any mental health or drug addiction problems. So eventually they'll lose the house due to debts and end up homeless again
/r/MensRights14/10/22 12:07 AM
3

Lets pretend the OP volunteers in a soup kitchen. You can't really go, I'll serve those men some food. But that woman there, forget it, I'm not serving her
/r/MensRights14/10/22 12:02 AM
5

TikTok? You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy
/r/MensRights13/10/22 11:08 PM
3

It didn't state at the detriment of women, though did it.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 10:51 PM
5

Yes. Your point?
/r/MensRights13/10/22 10:42 PM
3

Okay, but do you stand under a tree during a lightening storm? Where does this fit in with the rest of your advice? No, you shouldn't do that as the tree could be hit by lightening and you'd be electrocuted
/r/MensRights13/10/22 01:33 AM
2

Read what I quoted from the definition you posted a link to
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:24 PM
5

If you read it, you might have noticed someone did a hack job with the definition: First Known Use of incel 1999, in the meaning defined above Nineteen-ninety-nine predates Reddit.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 09:24 PM
6

Are you an actual living Poe?
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:47 PM
2

I've got Betty Ford on the line
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:13 PM
7

You disagree that women and feminism are blamed That's an oversimplification. So how about this instead, lets take domestic violence against men. Why aren't men seen as legitimate victims? If feminists fought for women to be seen not just as victims but for government funding to support shelters why didn't feminists also fight for the same for men? Why is funding specific to sex and why are men excluded? There's a whole industry built around the idea men are perpetrators of domestic violence and…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 03:21 PM
9

Actually they don't. It may have a good start but the conclusion is rubbish
/r/MensRights08/10/22 12:03 PM
10

You should probably know the mods will go through your post history and find this post. It'll probably be marked up as antagonistic Can't say I've posted over there much. Checked old and that states I've got -8 karma over there and I've posted once. Can only recall the one comment that was pretty recent -- I thanked someone for their comment. I vaguely recall replying to someone about paper abortions but I'm unsure which subreddit that was in Remember to use common sense when formulating questio…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:09 AM
6

That wasn't just a top answer. It was an answer by one of their antagonistic mods Edit: Hold up, that reply was stickied
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:37 AM
10

It's the main character in the webcomic -- Blobby and Friends
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:28 PM
2

It's predicated on penetration. Think female on male rape falls under S4 (1) A person (A) commits an offence if— (a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b) B does not consent to the penetration, and (c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents. (2) Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents. (3) Sections 75 and 76 apply to a…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 08:30 PM
1

I forgot about that post 😶
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/22 02:29 AM
2

The post was automoderated. So was removed for whatever reasons, then edited which presumably lead to it being approved
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/22 01:35 AM
9

LMFTFY: I’d hesitate resorting to misogyny in response to perceived misandry Either both are perceived or neither are No, but this is exactly what I mean. Check your misogyny. How about not watering down terms, that'd be great This is applying the same thought process of bringing women into STEM as bringing men into HEAL fields. Women make up the majority of workers in STEM fields (that's been achieved, yay). One of the main issues is accurate reporting. There's been a number of misleading artic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/22 07:30 PM
2

I think the focus of that was government funding -- men are explicitly being excluded. I haven't seen any updates by the OP so I'll leave this here -- it was brought up on Instagram: Did you read the article from denverite.com @thetinmen? Because there they clarify it isnt @denverbasicincomeproject that decided these requirements but due to the funds coming from the federal government and a decision of the city of Denver. It's still disgusting that men aren't allowed to participate with these fu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/22 06:27 PM
3

I hadn't heard that one before. It usually revolves around male supremacy and the subjugation of women
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/22 08:54 PM
5

It will get removed as one ended on the 8th September. As it stands, one per topic can only be posted once per year (the petition runs for six months then there's a six month period you can't re-submit it) They don't make it easy to find them: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/610458 Edit: Link in the OP returns 404: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/623908 Edit2: 18 days later and it's still moderated. There can't be much of a queue
/r/MensRights01/10/22 08:47 PM
4

We're waiting on that definition
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/22 11:29 AM
2

From the article: Imran Ahmed, chief executive of the Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a British non-profit group which carried out the study, said: "Incels are not lone wolves or socially isolated. Study: https://counterhate.com/research/incelosphere/
/r/MensRights01/10/22 11:09 AM
1

One is directly paying for sex the other isn't. That could also include paying for say a condom. I vaguely remember an article about that in a British rag (how they got around solicitation laws)
/r/MensRights01/10/22 12:58 AM
8

In total, 520 households will each get $12,000 over the course of a year, with additional funding coming from private donors and foundations. While the city’s contract is specifically for 140 women and transgender and gender-nonconforming people, the project as a whole is open to people 18 or older, connected with a partner organization and do not have “severe unaddressed mental health or substance abuse issues,” according to the Denver Basic Income Project’s website. https://denverite.com/2022/…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/22 09:01 PM
6

https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/ovfxf5/whats_up_with_a_mod_named_u_awkwardtheturtle/
/r/MensRights29/09/22 01:32 AM
33

That's probably a Reddit mod with turtle in their username
/r/MensRights28/09/22 10:17 PM
49

That's solicitation
/r/MensRights28/09/22 01:53 AM
5

TL;DR: Sergei - not his real name - has already been called up. The Kremlin said only people who had done their military service and had special skills and combat experience would be called up. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky urged Russians to resist the mobilisation during his nightly address on Thursday. The move is effectively an admission that Russia has exhausted its supply of willing volunteers to fight in Ukraine," it said. Even if successful, challenges remain - and it is unlikely…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:16 PM
10

I've long said Harvey Weinstein was innocent, when even other MRA's gave me shit, I stood my ground. Something similar happened with anyone who posted in support of Bill Cosby. But here's the problem, you wrote even other MRAs gave you shit. But how did you come to the conclusion they're MRAs? I'm not sure posting on a subreddit makes you, at minimum, an advocate. Also there's an open door policy so anyone can and will contribute in discussions. Especially when a post appears in r/all Too many M…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/22 11:33 PM
1

Ah, I'm a episode behind
/r/MensRights23/09/22 02:01 PM
1

I'm talking about the three who jumped her in that alley and tried to take her blood. Punisher woulda smoked them on the spot with no guns and 1/100 her strength. Forgot about that
/r/MensRights22/09/22 10:22 PM
10

which woman in the story wasn't a mean girl trope? Put a name to them
/r/MensRights22/09/22 07:44 PM
18

The first person she threw a straight up HAYMAKER AT that absolutely would kill you... was a woman villain. Her next fight was a legal battle with a woman. Same person -- Titania trademarked She-Hulk as a form of revenge (for the pew to the face) For God's sake people, she went lightly on three dudes who tried to mug her They tried to chat her up and if it wasn't for the Hulk they'd probably be dead (if you mean the first episode) The problem with the show is its horribly inaccurate courtroom an…
/r/MensRights22/09/22 07:40 PM
4

Their meals are usually all right and they're usually quiet after 8-9pm 🤷‍♂️ Just don't interact with any other customers and you should be fine. There's way worse places out there
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/22 04:54 PM
5

Plus, it costs money to go out and do basically anything with other people. It isn't just the money it's the lack of comradery. Tried doing that doing that for a few years. Joined a socialising group on Facebook and went out mostly to a pub called Wetherspoons It was depressing af. I'd go home early and grab a pizza on the way back and just get drunk. I associated it with the phrase fade to black
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/22 12:31 AM
52

These judges, like many other critics, viewed Obama's Title IX rules, which Biden is now copying, as fundamentally unfair. It was Biden all along Vice President Biden Announces Strengthening of Title IX Washington, D.C. - Today, Vice President Biden announced that the Administration has issued a ‘Dear Colleague’ letter that withdraws a 2005 interpretation of Title IX policy. Enacted in 1972, Title IX mandates that any educational institution receiving federal funding for programs and activities …
/r/MensRights21/09/22 02:39 AM
1

It allows you to view removed posts and comments (those removed by moderators). You can only view the title of a user deleted post and any comments to it. And you can't view user deleted comments
/r/MensRights20/09/22 07:43 PM
2

No problem 🙂
/r/MensRights20/09/22 06:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter