TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GrimB0LD Archive

View 0 posts and 686 comments by GrimB0LD on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

What the fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights18/04/17 06:21 PM
1

Protocal_NGate said not to. Stupid bot. Go away.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 02:06 PM
2

Is this real? This is so stupid it cannot possibly be real.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 07:00 PM
29

Of course they can. "Mansplaining! Fisking! No Platform! Triggering!"
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:09 PM
114

I have no issue with strong female characters. I do have a problem with badly-written ideological pandering.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:23 AM
5

dem jpeg artifacts
/r/MensRights04/04/17 01:21 PM
0

This is obviously not meant seriously, so why get angry over it?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:10 AM
3

I'm not giving those guys any clicks.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 02:01 PM
3

Is there a more reliable source for this than Breitbart?
/r/MensRights29/03/17 01:00 PM
5

Watch them now scream "CERNSORSHIP! SUPPRESSION! "
/r/MensRights26/03/17 08:48 AM
8

Favourably....
/r/MensRights25/02/17 07:06 PM
2

How the hell does a child molester get awarded custody of another child anyway?
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:18 AM
3

I think it's pretty clear that this is a piss-take of Drumpf's stupid Muslim register. It's dopey, but let's not pretend it's meant seriously.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:12 AM
3

They keep trying. They also keep getting downvoted to oblivion, but it doesn't stop them.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 10:33 AM
1

I'd consider myself slightly left of center on most issues, and leaning a little towards the anti-authoritarian side too.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 09:39 AM
8

At least in Australia, the conservative parties have never been fans of due process. They always make "tuff on criem" hyperbole a big part of their platform. That, and the conservative LNP are currently in opposition in Queensland- they do not actually care about the issue at all except for the opportunity to criticise the current government.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 09:35 AM
8

Can we do this in a font that doesn't look like ass?
/r/MensRights31/01/17 02:19 PM
12

Pretty sure men did not create polio, smallpox or that nasty fucking guinea worm. Also pretty sure it was primarily men responsible for eradicating them.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 07:36 PM
3

Fuck off back to AMR with that false flag nonsense.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 08:46 PM
5

Men
/r/MensRights12/01/17 03:59 PM
1

But seriously, just imagined he had thawed up a dude to watch sport, play video games and eat pizza with ... would be a non-issue. Okay, if there is no other topic to cry about it would be condemned too ... because there are no women involved. This is basically "Red Dwarf".
/r/MensRights11/01/17 05:29 PM
4

What the hell kind of crap is this? How is that relevant to this sub?
/r/MensRights30/05/16 07:22 AM
1

She's right about one thing, people do get less time in prison for killing someone. But usually that's women who murder their sleeping husbands.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 01:26 PM
6

Is this governor likely to veto it?
/r/MensRights11/05/16 06:19 AM
2

Pretty sure that's Iron Man. The white spot is probably supposed to be his arc reactor thing.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 05:51 AM
6

YEAAAAAAAAHHHHH
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:38 PM
31

Do you understand what hyperbole is?
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:38 PM
27

Why 48 miles? Why that exact number? It seems suspiciously specific to me.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 08:15 PM
4

Best they can hope for is a job at a uni teaching Gender Studies.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 09:46 PM
6

Well, Roosh is not in the MRA section, so they've been paying a miniscule amount of attention.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 07:05 PM
3

What an insane, inarticulate rant.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 06:21 AM
1

A rape fantasist is the last person I want working in forensic biology. >:(
/r/MensRights01/05/16 09:01 AM
1

"Trigglypuff", man that hashtag is brilliant.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:38 PM
16

If P, then Q. Q. Therefore P. If it's a cat, it has four legs. My dog has four legs. Therefore my dog is a cat.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:07 PM
5

Is there even a shred of evidence connecting these clubs to any actual sexual assaults?
/r/MensRights25/04/16 06:05 PM
2

So you keep saying.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:25 PM
5

Do you also and simultaneously have a glass of air?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 08:43 PM
1

What's with the condescending nicknames and Weird Capitalisation?
/r/MensRights15/04/16 09:56 PM
1

Well, it's two slightly different things that are being measured. The guys asking for a paternity test come from the subset of men who already suspect their wives are cheating, not a representative sample of all the men in the population.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 07:37 PM
0

Look at the date on the article. Not intended seriously.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 06:45 AM
7

I can kinda get that they're trying to emphasize that these are murdered civilians, not soldiers, but surely you could say that in those words.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 09:35 AM
3

Interesting that the kids' welfare is #1 in the father's mind, but "Waa! He knows how important the issue is to me!" for the mother.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 07:22 AM
2

Good on him.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 03:55 PM
35

Yeah, I have absolutely no idea what that article is about. So badly written.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 03:52 PM
16

By making purely ad hominem attacks without addressing a word of what I've said, you have conceded defeat. I accept your capitulation. Thank you.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 07:04 PM
11

The complainants are not on trial and do not need a legal defense team. Their place in the proceedings is to give evidence against the accused. The prosecution makes that happen. The only legal protection I can think of that they need is against defense counsel being unfair and inappropriate during their questioning. The prosecution needs to make sure of that too. So, yes, even though the prosecution represents the public/state/Queen Elizabeth, and not the complainants, the prosecution automatic…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 06:58 PM
50

Complainants do not have the right to a funded lawyer. The prosecution already fills that role.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 10:04 AM
16

So much salt on Twitter right now. It's like the dead sea.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 03:50 PM
4

Because if they were going to lie, they'd make up something that wasn't so lame and petty.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 08:32 PM
16

He wasn’t as attractive in person and I didn’t like the way he talked Wow, all class. he couldn’t keep his erection Evidently the feeling was mutual.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:51 PM
2

Stripper.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:30 PM
1

Looks like they started with the full-on sexist version, tried to change it to be more neutral in Word, but got sloppy towards the end.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 06:45 AM
2

Australia too. We also put refugee children in offshore concentration camps. >:(
/r/MensRights22/03/16 06:38 AM
3

If this is the plan, then the banned fraternities should not sell to Harvard, but convert their clubrooms into a profitable business venture. Like a hog farm, for example.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 07:53 PM
-1

Meh. I'd like to see gutter journalists given severe financial penalties for this kind of stunt. But I don't want to see Hogan or Andrews given such a huge windfall that they thank their lucky stars for the rest of their lives. Where should the punitive fine money go then? Seems least bad all round to send it somewhere that it can benefit lots of people.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 12:29 AM
1

Having trouble pinning down who you are. The problem is that you a) don't properly read what I'm saying, b) just make up any old shit to attribute to me, and c) feign astonishment at not understanding that bullshit. You talk about power differential like a feminist Hahaha, no. and ignore the abuse of one person by another if both people are of diminished mental capacity. What? Again, I said no such thing. A down syndrome 15 year old who sexually molests a 5 year old will still be punished, perha…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 12:22 AM
-35

Unpopular opinion, I know, but I don't think Hogan should have got anything like an eight figure verdict. Just like that lady in the similar case should not have got anything like the $55 million she got. Yes, I get there has to be a significant financial penalty to discourage gutter publications like Gawker making money from invading peoples' privacy. And I agree that the offended party should get some reparations. But with cases like this, I can almost hear the suers shouting "JACKPOT" all the…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 11:54 PM
1

In much the same way that I justify laws which punish people for abusing mentally disabled people Right, so it's the power differential. I certainly agree with protecting the vulnerable from being exploited by, for instance, their carers and guardians. But if two mentally disabled people hook up, I don't think either should go to jail. It would be perverse to claim they both preyed on each other, and even worse to just arbitrarily pick one of them to punish. Even they believe it, since they want…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 11:23 PM
0

Oh FFS, there is something really wrong with your reading comprehension. You say a 20 or 40 year old goes to jail for sleeping with a 15 year old, I say that actually a female teacher with a male student likely avoids jail, and you go off on a series of bizarre lawyerish tangents with a lot of long but irrelevant quotations. That's a fallacy. The law says they should be treated differently and they are being treated differently. That means the law is being used as intended. I don't get how you t…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 11:01 PM
1

It's clear to me, from reading your posts and replies in this thread, that you have trouble understanding what people are saying to you. Whether your incomprehension is feigned or genuine is what I haven't figured out yet. Are you really unaware that I'm talking about applying laws equally for males and for females? Can you really have missed that? Honestly? If you think the 16 year old male should go to jail, do you agree that the girl should go to jail too? If not, why not? You may not retreat…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 09:55 PM
1

Not if it's a female teacher with a male student. Should, but doesn't.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 09:25 PM
6

Um, what exactly makes this about sex specifically? It could be talking about anything.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:23 PM
2

I've never touched my default subreddits. Never even looked at them until about a minute ago. TwoX is not on the list. Maybe I registered at a time that this cesspool was not a default sub.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 09:46 PM
1

Number four is a no-brainer. White mother, white "father", black kids. The other three I guessed right by luck.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 07:23 PM
2

I think this is something to do with the awkward translation. I doubt whether these three people actually died, but no idea what is actually meant. edit: no, actually, they did all die. Says so on the other thread regarding this story. Weird. :/
/r/MensRights11/03/16 08:55 PM
1

Who gives a shit? What does this have to do with mens' rights?
/r/MensRights11/03/16 06:56 AM
1

Huh, is this /r/womenactingbadly ?
/r/MensRights10/03/16 07:26 PM
1

I think that is another example of feminists failing to distinguish the individual from the class.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 04:29 PM
4

To be accurate, the lead author did not get hundreds of thousands of dollars to write this one bit of idiotic drivel. That money was to fund his entire research over several years beginning in 2013. In fairness, he's produced other papers that apparently are credible scientific publications. That said, this bit of empty postmodernist gobbledygook has probably cost the taxpayer tens of thousands. Producing nonsense like this and calling it research borders on theft by deception- morally anyway.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 08:17 PM
3

This is just a stock photo of someone holding a soldering iron wrong. What does it have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:51 AM
-2

Men and women both have the option for surgery as well. You forgot to put that on there.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:38 AM
2

Oh, what rubbish. If the judge was malicious, he would have ruled in favour of Guthrie. He was deceived by an impostor account, that's all.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 08:49 PM
7

Respect to Judge Knazan for admitting his error and setting the record straight.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 03:19 PM
15

There was that fucking awful Thor comic book series where they made Thor a woman. Not sure if that counts.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 03:12 PM
3

"I hate this guy, so it's OK to fuck him over" sure does sound like something a feminist would say. Don't get me wrong- this kid's whinyness makes me cringe. But there's a difference between feeling embarrassed for someone and hating them enough to abandon my principles just to see harm come to them. Spite is just as much a character weakness as whining. Also, I wonder just of much of this kid's whinging is just hamming it up for the courts on instruction from his lawyer.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 02:24 PM
3

So you're saying, because he's got a bit of a whiny emo thing going on, that he shouldn't have the same protection under the law that a girl abused by a male teacher would have?
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:12 PM
1

The unaccompanied child presumably isn't being a douche or whining, so it's actually not clear who the offended party is.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 07:22 AM
1

Harold be thy name.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 07:09 PM
7

Bitch made the bed, now the flirty girl from work gets to lie in it.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 07:37 AM
5

Not to mention guys sent home because of serious injuries, and in a few cases adolescent boys who weren't allowed to sign up because they were too young.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 06:49 AM
1

Do you need to be taught not to do that?
/r/MensRights06/02/16 05:03 PM
1

There's a word for this: flouncing.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 07:59 PM
1

Although the verdict was correct, it is disappointing just how much of Guthrie's bullshit the judge fell for.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 07:04 AM
3

Short answer: no. Long answer: Hell no.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:11 PM
2

The problem is that sometimes the legal system returns a verdict of "not guilty".
/r/MensRights26/01/16 07:06 PM
9

Throwing a cat against a wall is monstrous. Stabbing someone to death in a fit of rage is also monstrous. Neither of these people are good people, and if the guy had survived the stabbing I would want him prosecuted for animal cruelty. She's going to jail for murdering him, which is also fair. The good news is, Vasili the cat is OK.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 07:23 AM
2

Obvious false flag troll is obvious. Back to AMR with you.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 07:43 PM
0

This guy is an idiot.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 09:47 PM
1

:):):):):):):):) YES!
/r/MensRights22/01/16 07:43 PM
5

Fingers crossed.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 06:24 AM
6

Cancer is always a big deal. There is no such thing as a petty cancer.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 08:34 PM
8

First poison M&Ms, now this.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 07:10 PM
5

Shame that "schadenfreude" is German, not Portuguese.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 05:26 PM
4

Fuck off back to AMR.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 08:23 PM
2

WSJ Warrior, Social Justice
/r/MensRights06/01/16 08:30 AM
11

Well, I would say that everybody should be believed at first until they are disbelieved based on evidence. "I did not do it."
/r/MensRights06/01/16 12:22 AM
7

man door hand hook car door
/r/MensRights30/12/15 07:06 AM
4

The act of making more room is an oppressive patriarchal gesture. By conspicuously demonstrating his mastery of his immediate environment, the hegemonic male is intimidating the womyn with a misogynistic microaggression.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 10:08 AM
3

I have never met a serial killer in my life, but fatties are everywhere. Who has the more realistic concern? I am not sure what point they're trying to make here. Unless it's to vilify a man for having physical preferences and dreading the prospect of dragging himself through a tedious date with someone he's just not attracted to but who might turn out to be very clingy and guilt-trippy about it.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 10:29 PM
-2

In this situation I disagree. This is in Australia, not Vancouver. There are not so many homeless people, and from what I have seen few of them have even one knife, let alone several. If someone is waving a chisel around it's not reasonable to assume she probably has a knife as well, or she would have pulled the knife. Finally, it is a very silly idea to announce your intention to stab someone in the neck to everyone and then do exactly that, if you want a court to later believe you were only in…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 03:47 PM
1

Oh, it's you again. Nah, I'm not taking the bait this time. Go rage and rant at someone else.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 01:35 PM
9

No, it's not legal. You've got the right to defend yourself with necessary force, but no more than that. Disarming her is fine. Disarming her, then stabbing her in the face with her own chisel is not.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 01:23 PM
9

Wow, not just sexist, but a violent racist too. This bitch really has nothing going for her.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 12:34 PM
0

I think I wasn't clear enough. I meant to say that for every three people who write crap like this as a joke, there's one moron who writes it in all seriousness. If 80% of readers believe it's meant seriously, regardless of the writer's actual intentions, is a different question.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 05:26 PM
8

Exactly. For every three satirists who write something like this as a joke, there's one moron who earnestly believes it.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 11:54 AM
1

It's Vice, the limbo bar of journalism. The FOX news of the left. Getting upset at what they say is like taking it personally when your two-year-old has a tantrum and yells "I hate you! I'm running away from home!"
/r/MensRights22/12/15 05:42 PM
2

What an idiot. It's like he's given up trying to make any kind of point. He's just copying and pasting stuff from here randomly and interspersing it with snarky commentary. There's no coherent point to any of it. Wolfgang Pauli would describe it as "not even wrong"
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:29 AM
2

Who cares? This is like a cucumber enthusiast nominating herself for Cucumber Fancier of the Year in the Cucumbers Weekly newsletter. Niche award in a niche publication.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:25 AM
2

The average feminist is full of herself, perpetually angry, and not very bright. Anyone fitting that description is troll bait.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:42 PM
2

Fuck off back to AMR. Nobody's falling for this false flag crap.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 10:07 AM
6

I think the whole point of this little whinge is to equate questions like "Do you have evidence for your claims" with abusive "Imma cum on ur avatar" tweets by lumping them all together. Profoundly dishonest.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 09:30 AM
2

I have to agree. This guy can spend his own time how he likes.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 06:58 AM
6

How about you take your AWALT bullshit elsewhere?
/r/MensRights02/12/15 11:00 PM
2

Has this ever been independently verified?
/r/MensRights29/11/15 12:18 PM
3

Fake.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 07:26 PM
1

Promise?
/r/MensRights25/11/15 07:12 PM
1

Utah is a long way from the sea, and the neighboring states would be saying "You're not driving them through here, buddy."
/r/MensRights25/11/15 06:59 PM
3

What an awful, dishonest asshole.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 07:00 AM
1

Don't be an idiot.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 06:46 AM
2

Yup, this does have the smell of a Joe Job.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:18 PM
1

I'm a Protestant Christian, and I do not share your values.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:11 PM
1

Who's cutting onions?
/r/MensRights24/11/15 09:49 PM
5

I thought it was a bit off as well. It's like there's a list of talking points and makes sure to tick off every one. It's too pat. Not buying it.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 10:44 PM
1

You used the word "expelled" yourself. I did read the link, well enough to realise there was no independent verification of this alleged incident. I'm still skeptical that even the nutty SJW morons would be able to go to this kind of extreme.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:24 PM
7

I think I remember reading that the Sharon Stone one was entirely made up. One or two of the others seem to have been taken out of context also. We should not indulge in misquotation.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 05:42 PM
1

Was this incident ever verified? Pardon my skepticism, but expelling a student just for looking like someone else seems extreme even for the nutty campus PC brigade.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 09:39 AM
1

She's getting torn to strips in the comment section.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 06:54 AM
3

misrepresents what the other party believes I would add the word "deliberately", because people can misrepresent the words of others because they haven't understood them.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:58 AM
2

Please blur the names.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 04:22 PM
2

Not with that attitude.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 04:18 PM
1

You type like a six year old, and you just repeat my insults back at me because you haven't got any imagination. I don't really think I need to worry what you think of me. Run along now.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 03:25 PM
-1

You really don't have any redeeming features as a person do you? You think tit-for-tat pedo accusations are OK, so it's clear that you don't have an ounce of decency. And anyone who can say mangled things like " since its justice or criminal dependant on who the instigated and who was targeted" has a pretty poor mastery of the English language. You are both a shitty person and a stupid one. You're contemptible, and I think you know it, and the only way you can feel good about yourself is to imag…
/r/MensRights31/10/15 03:02 PM
1

You're projecting.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 02:37 PM
1

That doesn't make any sense at all and, I suspect that if it did, it would still be really stupid.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 01:37 PM
3

Nope, that would just drag you down to her level.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 10:43 AM
1

Ah yes, this is that thing where you make an ass of yourself, someone points it out, then you pretend you were kidding all along.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 10:59 PM
1

It's "petard", dumbass.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 10:27 PM
2

Well done!
/r/MensRights26/10/15 06:00 AM
10

Wow, stupid and unfunny. You really haven't got anything going for you, do you?
/r/MensRights25/10/15 06:33 PM
12

No means no.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 06:24 PM
2

Interesting that the article (and the Treasurer) are careful not to mention the gender of the alleged perpetrator. This leads me to suspect that it's female-on-male DV, or a homosexual couple involved.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 06:21 PM
4

You incessantly nag. You hear yourself nagging him but you can’t stop. In other words, your personality flaws are his fault.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 01:39 PM
6

That, and she wouldn't dare libel a lawyer.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 07:51 PM
1

That little bit of schadenfreude wouldn't be worth it.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 08:34 PM
1

Of the monkeys? No. Try youtube.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 05:42 PM
2

She's a nut. That letter is a lot of bizarre ranting, even by SJW standards. Shit-flinging howler monkeys make their points more articulately.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 05:44 AM
3

What a stupid delusional little idiot.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 12:34 PM
1

Is there a standard "lawyer uniform" that would make it obvious that the fellow student is supposed to be a lawyer? Just wearing a suit would not make that clear.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 12:03 PM
1

That would be fine if the Republicans weren't also batshit insane.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 11:28 AM
9

Or just bullshit in unending quantities.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 07:59 PM
2

Those insane bulging eyes... shudder
/r/MensRights08/10/15 06:40 AM
3

Does modern feminism have a problem with free speech? Is water wet?
/r/MensRights08/10/15 06:28 AM
38

A suspicious incident occurred at Hilltop Apartments, in the parking lot The intention of the male is unknown. He was... going to his car?
/r/MensRights07/10/15 06:40 AM
7

"Clementine Ford" Nope.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 06:36 AM
1

Ahaha. Serves her right, the silly idiot. Couldn't have happened to a more deserving person. I don't agree with criminalising most forms of offensive speech and I think this is a stupid waste of time. It pains me to have to defend someone like her, but I'd be a hypocrite if I didn't. She's not making it easy though. After the furore, Mustafa denied that her initial request for white men to stay away from a union meeting was racist or sexist, Bullshit. and said she had received rape and death thr…
/r/MensRights06/10/15 09:25 PM
4

If some shifty girl deliberately bumped into me on the street I would immediately think "pickpocket".
/r/MensRights05/10/15 05:48 AM
2

The whole thing sounds like the plot of a daytime soap opera.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 05:43 PM
5

Obviously an attempt at satire.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 02:58 PM
1

I doubt it's supposed to mean "gigadollars"
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:26 AM
1

And never find anything you're looking for ever again. I tried duckduckgo for a couple of months for these very reasons, but I eventually reluctantly switched back because duckduckgo is actually really shit at being a search engine.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:59 PM
2

What does this have to do with men's rights? I'm against this shackling stuff, because I am against the pointless humiliation of prisoners generally.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 08:10 PM
3

This Futrelle person really has nothing better to do than hang out here looking for things to quote out of context? What a miserable loser.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 08:07 PM
0

That analogy desn't really work. There is no way to somehow enforce that a bed can only be used for sleeping and reading, but block other uses like you'd block an internet domain.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 07:44 AM
-3

The rationale they give for banning it is SJW drivel, and this article is snide idiotic bullshit, but aside from that I agree that taxpayer funded internet at an educational institution shouldn't be used for porn.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 08:49 PM
26

This is /r/MensRights, not /r/womendoingbadthings
/r/MensRights18/09/15 05:57 AM
4

Cool. Can we also do away with crap like mansplaining, manspreading, etc?
/r/MensRights17/09/15 06:30 PM
8

What do you mean "or"?
/r/MensRights13/09/15 12:23 PM
74

Medical miracle! Family law judge possesses both a heart and a brain.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 06:00 AM
16

This. Also, the judge suggested that the Act is incompatible with the father's human rights. It suggests to me that, actually, the judge is sympathetic to the father, but is required to uphold the legislation as written even if he would prefer not to.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 08:31 PM
4

And this "article" you think is the source of all worldly truth also makes pains to refer to the father is quotes - as in the 'father' - I wonder if they would have referred to him that way if he was being sued for child support. I'm pretty sure those aren't scare quotes. They're actually being used for their proper purpose- to indicate a direct quotation. In this instance the word "father" is being quoted from a piece of legislation, which carries a set of prerequisites, rights, and obligations…
/r/MensRights07/09/15 08:27 PM
17

It's not the magistrate that's the problem, it's the law. Article makes it clear that this is not just the judge arbitrarily being a jerk.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 06:48 PM
1

Concern trolling isn't a helpful tactic either though.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 11:55 AM
7

"White people should not condemn genocide" What the fuck?
/r/MensRights25/08/15 10:05 PM
3

I have no doubt that's part of it, but it will not be enough to explain the whole difference.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 07:55 AM
9

I'm not an expert in this area of the law. But is it possible that the Crown is deliberately damaging their own case? That is, aiming for a dismissal on a technicality because they know they won't win and don't want the court to set an adverse precedent.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 06:06 AM
20

lets players electrocute, hit and mace a virtual boyfriend There is no actual violence in the app Um, what?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 06:01 AM
14

True. But many feminists can't offer any of those things either.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:13 PM
1

99% sure that's actually satire.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 09:37 AM
2

It's true that we are not in /r/Egalitarianism. But we are not in /r/feministsaredumb either.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 09:24 AM
1417

If your wife is a violent vindictive sadist nobody could blame you for wanting to leave her. Except for these cackling shrews.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 02:17 PM
11

"Technical issues" my ass. Still, even with the head start Bindel got, Matt wiped the floor with her.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:04 PM
6

The difference is that racism is the point of that vile sub. Misogyny is not the purpose of this one. The racists post stories of black people committing crimes because they want to prove that black people are inherently criminal. There is no similar motivation for posting stories of individual women acting badly here. Rather, the motivation is to highlight the fact that no man could get away with doing those things, or that nobody seems to consider it wrong when the crime is committed against a…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 11:56 AM
4

So you equate criticism of feminism with hatred of women. Interesting.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 10:21 AM
2

Go and read your original post, then come back and tell us who started with the ad hominems.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 10:19 AM
8

What do I want? No idea! When do I want it? NOW!
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:31 PM
2

So if the Emperor in ancient Rome or Japan commanded some poor sap to fall on his sword, you'd call that suicide? Most people would call that an execution.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 09:48 PM
1

It's so pathetic when humorless people try to make jokes.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 06:55 PM
5

She's rubbing it in Paulo's face.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 06:22 PM
1

What is your feeling? Is this dude likely to win the case?
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:21 PM
12

I don't believe it. He says he doesn't exercise that right often (read: not at all, and if he did there would be trouble).
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:20 PM
10

I wonder if he's sleeping with other women. Actually, I don't wonder. I bet he's not allowed.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:16 PM
3

Nope. Murder is not the way to go.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:32 AM
4

Committing perjury is what liars do in court. Committing purgery is what bulimics do in bathrooms.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 06:36 PM
2

AFAIK, the fact checker already existed during the previous government, or at least something very like it. They were verifying claims made by both sides in the election campaign.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 04:57 AM
2

Good point. I'll have to think about that.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 11:12 AM
3

Nah. Let's say I need to eat 2,000 calories a day to maintain a weight of 85kg and a 80kg man of my height needs 1,800 to maintain that weight. If I start eating 200 calories a day less, with exactly the same amount of exercise, my weight will steadily decrease until I hit 80kg. I won't be "starving" at any point. When I get to 80kg I'll be off my so-called "starvation diet" without doing a damn thing differently and you think that, somehow, I'll start packing on the fat again because I've stopp…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 08:07 AM
6

That's part of it for sure. But even without the feminist lobby, it would be better for judges not to make politicised statements. It's best that judges rule on cases according to the law as it is, without bias. On retirement it's appropriate for them to speak from their experience that this or that part of the law is fucked up and needs changing, but I do not really want activist judges.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 07:42 AM
1

It's weird how the article fixates on immigration issues. Sure, I accept that recent immigrants have it tougher than long-time residents in these situations, but I would guess the majority of the cases Kilner is talking about do not involve recent immigrants.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 07:37 AM
4

Great to see this man win his right to be a father. Here's an action opportunity for those of you in America: spread the word about these registries. Am I the only one who feels bad for the adoptive couple? This bitch lied to them, so they've been just as badly mistreated as Mr. Emanuel.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 07:24 AM
1

Lonely people don't always think straight and there's jerks of both genders who will take advantage of lonely people. This is not really an MRA issue.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 10:18 AM
9

Endlessly dishonest. They're the kind of people who'd look at an atheist railing against organised religion and conclude "MRAs are against womens' ordination."
/r/MensRights11/07/15 01:21 AM
1

You're forgetting two important points. First, sarcasm isn't always easy to recognise in the written word. Second, per Poe's Law, there is no opinion so stupid that some feminist doesn't genuinely hold it.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 06:18 AM
4

That's what I came here to say, pretty much word for word.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:14 PM
1

Bindel or Burchill?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:09 PM
2

Has to be a joke. Just has to. Nobody could be this stupid.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 06:43 PM
385

Of course they care. If they didn't, they'd have just stayed home. What they really mean is "We're terrified of what you have to say."
/r/MensRights28/06/15 09:47 AM
1

Who considers "jerk" to be a swear word? Really...
/r/MensRights22/06/15 07:09 PM
1

That hasn't been my experience, but your mileage may vary.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 09:10 AM
1

Ugh, what nasty, unfunny drivel.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 08:48 AM
1

On average they'll be no better or worse than their male colleagues at producing science, but hiring them would additionally provide their lab or institute with gender parity "cred".
/r/MensRights21/06/15 08:47 AM
1

That's weird even for autocorrect.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 08:38 AM
1

Does the Dear Colleague letter also compel these colleges to refuse to hear exculpatory evidence?
/r/MensRights21/06/15 08:36 AM
0

But without the wit or keen observational skills.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 08:07 AM
3

Rape culture and fat shaming in one tiny package!
/r/MensRights20/06/15 07:39 PM
10

Yodel pain?
/r/MensRights20/06/15 05:40 PM
2

That's a very well written piece.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:48 PM
1

Imma start sitting on womens' handbags and umbrellas then.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 05:26 AM
17

You forgot the Duke Lacrosse business. That is a seriously bad track record. Seems like every time they put up a poster girl for campus rape, she turns out to have made it all up.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 12:01 AM
1

I don't think that's true at all - I don't think men on this site go around the world calling people little bitches and cunts. I think use of that language online is when people turn inauthentic. DING DING DING! We have a winner.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:59 PM
5

Wow, the resemblance between these two guys was remarkable. No wonder the victim made a mistake.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 03:48 AM
2

Most of these stories are pure fiction anyway.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:21 PM
3

What a monster. But you know what the most terrifying thing is? The man believed staying with a sadistic torturer was better than being homeless.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 06:36 AM
2

It's Daily Life. Don't expect anything beyond inarticulate yelling from that rag.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 06:31 AM
4

Is that really what it's saying? I don't see anything about consent there.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:42 AM
19

Whoever told you those things about us was lying.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 04:16 PM
5

What a load of idiotic hyperbolic ranting.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 03:13 PM
38

It's not that more violence is being committed. Rates of violent crime are decreasing across the board. It's that more people are reporting it, and the progress that's being made is that men are becoming more likely to speak up.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 05:28 AM
3

number 11... facepalm I can't handle Dunning-Kruger of this magnitude.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 06:38 AM
2

How is this sad story relevant for this sub?
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:22 PM
46

Start with making sure boys get a decent education.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 05:51 AM
3

If you don't want a white man to hold an elected position, don't vote for him. Easy!
/r/MensRights29/03/15 08:05 AM
2

OK, so what do we do about it? Raising awareness like this is a good start, as it might shame some of the teachers into starting to grade fairly. But what else can be done?
/r/MensRights15/03/15 08:12 AM
3

If a war occurred more than 12,000 years ago, would evidence of it have survived to the current day? I suspect not.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 06:06 AM
1

Because, before you're dead, you'll be many years in that nursing home.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 10:47 PM
8

Nobody says poTAHto. Similarly, nobody thinks women==feminists.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 07:45 PM
6

Me too. The last thing we should be doing is woozling it up.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 08:22 PM
6

Yes, that kind of thing is exactly what I mean. Do you have links to this material?
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:54 PM
54

If true, this is disgusting and the guy should sue these idiots. However, is there any verification that this actually happened? I'd like to know all the facts before I engage my outrage mode.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 05:44 PM
4

Whining about bitchy women acting like fools isn't what this sub is supposed to be about. How does this relate to men's rights?
/r/MensRights05/03/15 04:09 PM
6

Drugging someone without their knowledge is a pretty serious crime, but I think 21 years is disproportionate.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 08:43 PM
1

I am against capital punishment. It seems strange that she gets the death penalty while her lover, who actually did the stabbing, only got 25 years. I guess he must have taken a plea deal.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 03:30 PM
2

Or, at a stretch, sharp fingernails.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 07:04 AM
6

Look at the posting history of all three four of these morons advocating rape and violence. Same person.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 01:46 PM
3

But a source close to the process told ESPN's Marc Stein that the NBA, after its review, does not regard Paul's comments ‎to be gender-based and issued the fine based on his public criticism. Nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 09:51 AM
31

Furniture removalist?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:05 PM
4

With a user name like that, is it any wonder that you are robotic and boring?
/r/MensRights02/02/15 05:44 PM
35

The school is in Kermit, Texas, so it's no surprise to see it run by a bunch of muppets.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 07:54 PM
6

Meh. The dude's knee is level with his shoulder, or would be if he wasn't turning to his left. Even if "manspreading" was even a thing or worth getting upset over, this wouldn't count. Besides, there's plenty of empty seats around.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 01:26 PM
6

Can you keep your stuff at work?
/r/MensRights01/02/15 09:41 AM
1

Welp, that's a mental image I did not need.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 06:54 PM
8

I don't know what people have been telling you, but there is no discrimination against trans people here.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 08:32 PM
2

Not a lot of details here. What actually happened?
/r/MensRights24/01/15 07:49 PM
1

Actually, they already fell for it once with the antivax crowd. Remember Andrew FWakefield?
/r/MensRights22/01/15 07:15 PM
3

Look at the comments. Almost everyone is criticizing this idiot.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 05:45 PM
10

Don't issue manstructions!
/r/MensRights20/01/15 07:25 PM
1

Paragraphs. Learn to use them.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 11:00 AM
2

Fred Nile has nutty opinions about all kinds of things.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:37 PM
1

The people I do give right of way to are grey-haired people. Age does confer merit, as far as I'm concerned, and I will bend over backwards for old people. Bingo. With age often comes deteriorating eyesight and hearing, as well as slower mobility. You've got to give consideration for that.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 07:29 PM
3

Not true. There are plenty of other places where the innocent are persecuted, sadly.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 11:03 PM
3

Demonspawn is right. It is not "common parlance" to say that someone is getting drugged on alcohol.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 10:52 PM
5

I thought that was Twitter. Or is that one for passive-aggressive whining? I always forget which is which.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:53 AM
4

He could have, very easily, if this stupid bitch hadn't kept a journal of her crimes or if it hadn't been found.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 12:00 AM
2

Excellent stuff.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 10:45 PM
3

Judges are allowed to set monthly payments that are higher than earnings. WTF? First thing to do is to remove that power, and remove those judges.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 11:45 PM
-1

What does this have to do with anything?
/r/MensRights16/10/14 11:23 PM
2

It's encouraging that nearly everyone commenting on the anti-due-process article are tearing it to shreds.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 10:39 PM
2

For those who aren't familiar with Australian media, The Age is a left-wing newspaper. Being left-wing, one might expect its editors and journalists to have imbibed heavily of the feminist kool-aid, so that they'd quietly non-report women being monstrous to boys. But today they had not just this story, but another one about the jailing a fat evil bitch of a teacher who tried to have sex with a ten year old boy.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 11:30 AM
-3

petty cruelty neocon ideology You're repeating yourself.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 03:49 AM
2

Of course the meeting was to have been held in a volcano shaped like a skull.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:13 AM
2

Not cool.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:24 AM
1

Mistaken identity is ridiculously common.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 05:10 AM
6

Another court reinstated the charges Glad to see these people have more sense and decency than Runston Maino.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 11:41 PM
4

Sometimes I wonder if these outrage-mongers want to prevent rape at all.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 03:55 AM
1

If it had been a woman hassled in the same way, Salon would have made this an issue of gender and gender alone.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 11:11 PM
10

And then, somehow, their inability to get the guy they want is going to be all the fault of men.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:38 AM
10

I guess it all depends on how you define "gaming". If it's all computer games of all types, then this may be accurate. But when most people think of "gaming", they don't mean fucking around on Farmville or Candy Crush.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 04:02 AM
1

There was a law (can't remember details, it was discussed here) designed to excuse women who murdered their husbands/boyfriends if they felt threatened or abused by them (or something like that). However, it was mostly used by men to get lesser sentences for murders. So because it was intended for women but ended up in the hands of men - it was scrapped. This was an Australian law that would lessen the sentence for people who murdered, genuinely believed their lives were in danger but who had no…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 01:52 AM
7

Even assuming such a law is a good idea in principle (!!IT IS NOT!!) how could it ever be enforced? How would a prosecutor ever gain enough evidence beyond "she-said-he-said" to get a conviction? Unless the idea is to take unsupported allegations as evidence.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:56 AM
1

These professors are way off base. Sid Phillips isn't just "rambunctious", he is mean, and there's nothing wrong with someone like him being the villain of the movie. He stole his little sister's toys and destroyed them. Next they'll be telling us King Joffrey was just a lonely hyperactive little boy.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:53 AM
2

I like this article. It's full of common sense and facts, and makes good points without badmouthing anyone.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 09:46 AM
9

Looks good, content wise. But I do not like the gold-on-maroon color scheme. Also, it could do with some proof reading: "will still be laible", "Shelter's", "Alpah males"
/r/MensRights18/08/14 09:42 AM
7

Men's lives and well-being are so undervalued that psychos like her can cause them serious injuries with impunity, and you wonder what this has to do with men's rights? Are you stupid?
/r/MensRights17/08/14 04:06 AM
5

"But it's about the rights of the child!" But when we're talking about the victim of statutory rape, that child's rights do not matter. He is relegated to the status of an ATM on legs.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 11:27 AM
4

Don't do that. We're civilized people, not animals.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:56 AM
1

In some cicumstances it's perjury, which is a crime.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 12:22 PM
8

Not everybody lives in America.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:55 AM
2

We're not talking about a toddler, we're talking about adults.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 06:30 PM
4

If someone suffers a crime they are a victim not a survivor. If the crime was attempted murder, I guess you could call them a survivor as well as a victim.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 06:00 AM
5

Let's not wish that on anyone. We're better than that.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:53 AM
1

True. And the fact that most rapes are committed by a relatively small number of serial rapists is poison to the idea that "all men are rapists", so naturally certain ideologues need to downplay it.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:49 AM
0

Can you make an ad wominem?
/r/MensRights22/06/14 03:37 AM
1

You forgot to mark your post with /s to indicate sarcasm. That's why people are downvoting you, because they think you're not just saying stupid things ironically.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 02:29 AM
24

Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:45 AM
3

Since the hypocrisy of feminists usually takes the form of sexism towards men, there's no real distinction.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:45 AM
1

You should take your own advice. Start with the term "MRA".
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:44 PM
10

No.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:44 AM
1

Why do you automatically assume the cops are lying?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:05 AM
5

Seems like Duke has learned exactly nothing from the lacrosse fiasco.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:15 AM
5

Well, the cops investigated and found insufficient evidence for an arrest, so the odds are in favor of this dude being innocent.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:13 AM
1

Ah yes, the old Buridan's Rapist ploy.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:48 AM
2

Because, unlike them, we would be lying.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 07:12 AM
5

A women-only programme was piloted at the aquatic centre last year but was canned after swimming numbers dropped away. Yes, this is to be expected if you ban half your customers.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 12:20 PM
1

Meh. Julia Gillard did a worse job as Prime Minister of Australia than Kevin Rudd, but a better job than Tony Abbott is doing. I don't think gender has anything to do with it.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 04:20 AM
2

Yes, but the article says she is Swedish.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:25 AM
1

You're a hateful idiot. Please go away. People like you give the MRM a bad name.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:20 PM
0

Well then, I guess I'll just have to live with your displeasure. Something tells me I won't lose much sleep over it.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:04 PM
0

Not everyone is familiar with this webcomic or its author. I've seen a few pages but I don't really follow it. Since the linked comic doesn't mention the MRM, I think it's fair enough for someone to ask what the relevance is. /u/Riktrat did a decent job of explaining but you just came huffing in here, full of resentment and bluster, to call people names for -God forbid- not knowing enough about XKCD and its author. Not helpful.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 05:42 AM
0

Inarticulate rage is clearly the best way to make a point.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:38 AM
3

Let's not descend to violence.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 10:25 PM
3

Sorry to have to say it, but what does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights19/04/14 09:46 AM
8

Meh. Your average AMR poster has fewer IQ points than feet, so who cares what those idiots think?
/r/MensRights18/04/14 06:18 AM
4

Piss off.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 06:14 AM
3

So judges can't be expected to know about reductions in a man's income; but they do somehow magically know if you're un- or under-employed by choice, or receiving undeclared cash payments?
/r/MensRights13/04/14 07:01 AM
3

I'm against the death penalty, so this seems about right.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 11:37 PM
2

Don't give this idiot page hits by linking directly.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:34 AM
1

Probably didn't happen.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 10:13 PM
1

That doesn't really make a lot of sense. Let's get one thing straight: the antivaxxers are wrong. Their claims about vaccines causing autism, or containing mercury, and whatnot, are all demonstrably false. The belief that vaccines are dangerous and/or useless is rooted in ignorance. If the antivaxxers are motivated by anti-authoritarianism, then that may give you some insight into their mindset, but it has no bearing on whether or not their beliefs are ridiculous (which they are!) I also disagre…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 01:21 AM
2

The anti-vaccination movement is not rooted in ignorance regarding science Ha! Yes it is. That's its major defining characteristic.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 12:25 AM
7

If your point is that the stuff coming out of gender studies departments is such nonsense that you can't tell it apart from the ramblings of someone who's lost much of their mental abilities to disease, then that's just tasteless. There are better ways of criticising the moral and intellectual vacuum that is Gender Studies without making fun of a sick person.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 11:04 PM
1

Cyberfeminists are frightening the first time you meet them, but once you've learned to strafedodge their rocket volleys you'll find a few well-placed hits with the BFG9000 do the job.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:39 PM
8

Couple of comments: In one case, a mother who alleges she is a victim of domestic violence will soon confront her alleged abuser in court as they battle over access to their children. That is as it should be. I believe the accused should have the right to face their accuser. Forbidding that is essentially presupposing guilt. two clients who had been subjected to forced marriage but could not obtain divorces because their husbands were in Pakistan and they had no marriage certificates. As their h…
/r/MensRights31/03/14 07:58 AM
21

"Feminist technoscience"? Really? It sounds like a serving of complete bullshit with a side dish of technobabble. But if a bunch of pseudo-intellectual posers spout a lot of drivel, what does that have to do with advancing the rights of men?
/r/MensRights31/03/14 05:22 AM
11

It's not that anyone thinks these "threats" are meant seriously. But if someone on the MRA side made a similar, non-serious, comment you can bet Dodgy Dave would screech and whine and try to pass it off as a genuine threat that proves the MRM is intrinsically violent.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 03:33 AM
7

A 10% reduction to 73 would mean 81 the year before. If you expect 81 events there's about a 20% probability of recording 73 events or fewer, just by random chance. This is not statistically significant. It would be wrong to assume this 10% decrease has a cause other than random chance.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:39 AM
3

If this is true, I condemn the attack unequivocally. I hope there's a proper police investigation. If she was attacked the perpetrator should be punished. If, as many suspect, this is a fake-up job she should be charged with wasting police time.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 12:11 AM
4

Going by the dates in the article, she was 17 when she made her false accusations. The girl, now 18, testified in a preliminary hearing... So she's 18 now, in March 2014. The girl’s family notified police, and Bountiful officers arrested Green in February 2013... So 13 months earlier she would have been 17.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 10:28 PM
4

[moeszyslak] Raperists! I knew it was them! Even when it was the kangaroos, I knew it was them! [/szyslak]
/r/MensRights24/03/14 01:30 AM
6

"Victim surveys", huh. Do these numbers count people who actually consider themselves victims? Or is it more of the shenanigans pulled by mendacious Mary Koss types, who ask women if they've ever had sex they later regretted and then call everyone who answered "yes" a rape victim?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 12:52 AM
1

Well, now there's a mental image I did not need.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:29 PM
6

Assuming he's guilty, this guy's an asshole. That said, why the hell has he been charged with murder? Wouldn't that imply that a fetus can be either human or non-human depending on who kills it?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:05 AM
2

Because they want their claims to be believed, not investigated.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 11:36 AM
12

The common theme running through this article is the misconception that men's rights and women's rights are opposed. The author claims MRA's blame every problem men face exclusively on women, which is not true. For instance, he says to somehow blame male combat deaths on women is not only absurd, but insane. Which is true, but misses the point because nobody actually does blame male combat deaths on women (and I think the author knows it). The results of these mental gymnastics are horrifying. A…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 11:08 AM
6

Probably meant to say "receipt" instead of "bank statement".
/r/MensRights10/03/14 04:25 AM
24

You know you're doing it wrong when even the lovelies over at Jezebel think you're dishonest and unfunny.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 12:08 AM
2

At least she said "please".
/r/MensRights09/03/14 09:22 AM
2

0/10 Too obvious. Troll subtler next time.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 02:20 AM
6

Another nice little victory. This is good news.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 03:30 AM
2

Yes, the Australian Liberals are liberal in the same way that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is democratic.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 03:26 AM
8

Only the Sith deal in absolutes.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 03:15 AM
3

True. Now we just need to make sure it's not selectively applied. There's always a tendency to take consent into account only if it is a woman's consent. We need to keep people aware that this is a two way street. Otherwise it turns into a double standard of "Man sabotages birth control, man gets sentenced to 18 months jail. Woman sabotages birth control, man gets sentenced to 18 years financial slavery."
/r/MensRights08/03/14 01:49 AM
7

Obviously the mortality rate in fiction is higher than real life across the board.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 09:19 PM
29

Don't be stupid. Lying isn't a gendered thing.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 09:57 AM
4

Well, the thing about asteroids is an outright fabrication. There's been about three reported cases of people being hit by meteorites in recorded history, and no fatalities, but hundreds of innocent men exonerated of rape convictions in America alone. So that stat is complete bunk.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 01:55 AM
2

Heartless? So is demanding people be convicted with no physical evidence of wrongdoing.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 12:29 AM
3

I suggest you base your opinion of the MRM on what they actually say, not the mendacious crap reported about them by its ideological enemies.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 12:28 AM
3

What the hell kind of stupid question is this?
/r/MensRights04/03/14 11:57 PM
1

I imagine it populated entirely by clones of Dolores Umbridge.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 11:36 PM
-4

mmc thinks she's still on AMR, where you can lie about what people say and nobody's allowed to call you out on it.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 11:03 PM
1

Ahahahahaha owned. Couldn't have happened to a more deserving person.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 10:41 PM
7

Absolutely. Take the allegation seriously, investigate thoroughly, and treat the accuser with respect. But don't assume every allegation is true without checking.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 10:29 PM
7

The fact that she was texting the guy all day after sleeping with him, and then later decided to make allegations, suggests she was lying.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 10:27 PM
6

Obviously we wouldn't call everyone who reports rape a liar. Just the people who, upon investigation, turn out to have been lying.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:55 PM
24

This guy is awesome. What a kind thing to do- saving so many lives at great cost to his reputation and personal safety, and with no thought for profit.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 11:14 AM
2

NARFALT
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:13 AM
9

You seem to be asking, when we talk about people being treated badly, that we not compare them to people who are treated well. I don't think that's reasonable. I honestly believe that a girl with the same apraxia and the same funny behaviour would probably not have been treated as badly as this boy was. Do you disagree? There is a prevailing attitude in education that girls are naturally good attentive students and boys are inherently stupid and easily distracted, and so I think it's likely a bo…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 10:36 AM
10

I seriously doubt that. The disorder is vary easily overlooked and the school staff probably would have jumped to something sexual even quicker. Consistent rocking back and forth would be much easier to misinterpret as some sort of sexual gratification in a female than it would be in a male. I disagree. I think it is far more likely that people seeing a six year old girl struggling with classwork and doing manic repetitive motions would (correctly) conclude she's distressed and not immediately a…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 07:20 AM
52

If this kid had been a girl, the school would not have behaved so shamefully. The apraxia would have been diagnosed much earlier, because a girl struggling with schoolwork is a Big Deal but nobody cares if a boy is restless and has bad handwriting. The repetitive rocking would have been seen for what it was if this kid was a girl, but because he's male and therefore automatically a sex fiend it was completely misinterpreted.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 01:51 AM
7

So... their response to seeing women they think aren't wearing enough clothing is to make them wear even less? I can't understand that kind of confused thinking. I think everyone here would condemn forcibly stripping people, male or female.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 01:25 AM
1

Sounds like a character in a Noel Coward play.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:04 AM
6

It's not intended to be taken seriously, surely.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 12:02 PM
9

I can buy magazines about monster trucks as well, but that doesn't mean I should be allowed to drive one around the city.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 09:48 AM
3

Males being selectively slaughtered is not a men's rights issue? Is it Opposite Day today?
/r/MensRights25/02/14 11:35 PM
3

There was a scene where his hospital was hosting a convention of visiting gynecologists. Patch Adams built a facade for the building in the shape of an enormous pair of legs in gynecological stirrups, with the door of the building where the genitals would be.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 07:02 AM
3

Perhaps he just wasn't interested in her.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:18 AM
3

"Prostate" is the organ. "Prostrate" is an adjective that means means lying face down on the ground.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:24 AM
6

Hmm, new account registered just to spout stupid bullshit on this one thread.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 08:29 AM
1

By all means have the individual threads. But have a combo thread as well.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 03:36 AM
14

I just spent a confusing ten minutes following that discussion. Apparently the clucking hens at AMR were upset that people like Paul Elam use the term, so it had to go. So this "Countered" person nominated it for deletion with some dumb rationale that most of the sources come from journals that he thinks are not up to par. Nobody bought it. And by that logic I'm sure I could find Wikipedia articles about feminist buzzwords based entirely on shitful papers in shitful gender studies journals.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 03:21 AM
6

Snow Keep is. It means that there's not a snowball's chance in hell of the discussion ending any other way, and you might as well close it early.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 03:14 AM
-1

That is a good idea. Start one thread, sidebar it, and then edit it whenever a new false accusation makes the press.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 02:41 AM
7

If we denounce people like Amanda Childress, it's because she is a mendacious cretin. Not because she is female. There are plenty of stupid, dishonest and evil men who are unpopular here as well.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 04:03 AM
9

I like this bit: The problem lies in how MRAs react to feminism. They see people talking about women’s issues and their reaction is not one of empathy. It is always, “What about us? Bad stuff happens to us too.” Such a ludicrously blatant bit of projection. Did it ever occur to you to think about how feminists react to the MRM? Do you think that reaction is an empathetic one? My guess is you've never thought about it. You start your article with insults and then presume to lecture us about empat…
/r/MensRights09/02/14 08:24 AM
1

Q. What's wrong with defining it as something like, "Engaging in a sex act with someone who has not given consent, or is not capable of giving consent"? A. That doesn't exclude male victims or female perpetrators; therefore impermissible.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 05:28 AM
1

Well, clearly this person has a very vivid imagination.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 09:14 PM
2

Who would want to preserve that crap?
/r/MensRights06/02/14 11:18 AM
2

"Surprise euthanasia"
/r/MensRights04/02/14 01:00 PM
1

You can already see it in the comments. So much stupid.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 01:50 AM
5

"Fighting teh patriary, DUH!"
/r/MensRights27/01/14 01:30 AM
2

Is this even real?
/r/MensRights26/01/14 04:06 AM
2

I think OP means something like "Even though feminists vilify all men as selfish beasts, here's one being kind with no expectation of being repaid". That point doesn't really come through clearly though.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 09:47 AM
3

Do you really expect an answer?
/r/MensRights21/01/14 02:43 AM
16

Damn. Seems like he's de-evolving back to his Wesley state.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 12:09 AM
8

People should just judge each issue on its merits, instead of supporting a party unthinkingly like it's a football team. I'm liberal on some issues and conservative on others. That gets me called a pinko by some people, a wingnut by others, so I figure I'm doing something right.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 11:46 PM
8

"Microaggression" is what you whinge about when there's not actually anything wrong.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 11:40 PM
0

Apartheid perhaps, but I think comparisons with the Nazi holocaust are unfair. Bigoted and unjust they may be, but family courts are not out to murder people.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 08:41 AM
3

Well, pardon me for having high standards.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:32 PM
6

That is one of the stupidest, most badly written bits of crap I have ever read.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 06:33 AM
9

I noticed that too. The allegations that the father neglected the kids and withheld groceries from them came from the murderer's legal team. Everyone knows that in family court fathers get accused of the most preposterous crap as a matter of course, yet this gets reported as fact. I hate the way stories like this get reported; if a father murders his kids, the man is a monster. If a woman murders her kids, the man is a monster. Bullshit. The murderer is a monster regardless of whether it's a man…
/r/MensRights15/01/14 04:55 AM
5

That ship sailed a long time ago.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 04:16 AM
2

Bravo!
/r/MensRights14/01/14 01:04 AM
14

It's a silencing tactic, like "check your privilege".
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:38 PM
-3

"Fucking Thcum" FTFY
/r/MensRights08/01/14 12:40 PM
6

The response will be "The patriarchy causes every problem in the world and we are fighting patriarchy. So there."
/r/MensRights08/01/14 12:25 PM
0

No, in this case it was to indicate a direct quote.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:43 AM
2

Is that you, King Canute?
/r/MensRights05/01/14 09:36 PM
1

Where does the article say it was a false accusation? It might have been false, or maybe this guy actually is a creep with busy hands.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 04:05 AM
2

This guy used to sound almost reasonable. What the hell happened to him?
/r/MensRights05/01/14 02:06 AM
6

Gillard wasn't much good and Kevin Rudd should never have been deposed in the first place, but Tony Abbott is a fool and his government has made a hash of everything it's touched since he took office. Why couldn't the last election have been Rudd v Turnbull? But hasn't the Ashes been great?
/r/MensRights05/01/14 12:23 AM
2

I like the picture at the top. I'm not sure if it was intentional, but I like the combination of her vacant gaze and the empty speechbubble coming out of the coffin.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 10:29 PM
3

Brilliantly well-written and thought provoking. Well done.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 10:23 PM
1

Seems to me that both of these people are idiots.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 09:27 PM
18

"I don't think it's particularly productive if a firm presents itself as 'If you want to beat up on your ex, we'll be there for you,'" said Dowd, director of the school's Center on Children & Families. It's always the same tune with people like this.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 12:36 PM
7

Gotta love those false dichotomies.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 11:41 PM
3

They sure do love to creatively misinterpret everything that's said here.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 07:11 AM
5

No. All the articles are shopping lists of men's "obligations" towards women. None of its content benefits the lives of men at all. It does nothing but tell men that they should be self-hating and servile. It is a hate site whose goal is to harm men.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 02:53 AM
7

Nobody interested in actually helping men would advertise xyonline as a resource. That repulsive hatesite does nothing but try to get men to loathe themselves just for being male, as you'd expect from the personal playground of well-known hypocrite and liar Michael Flood.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 02:02 AM
4

Make sure you document everything. Presumably there's already a solid paper trail of the money he's been sending. Retain copies of every letter and email you send to these knobs. Keep a log of every call you make and, if it's legal to, record the calls themselves. With extensive documentation that demonstrates your boyfriend has been trying to do right by his child, and it's CSS dropping the ball, you'll have something to work with. Perhaps you'll find someone bureaucrat willing to see reason wh…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 11:33 PM
7

Do you know, I've never seen Frances O'Grady and David Icke in the same room?
/r/MensRights31/12/13 10:24 AM
0

Here comes the troll brigade!
/r/MensRights31/12/13 12:24 AM
-1

Another boring troll thread. To make humor work, you actually have to have a sense of humor. And to make satire work, you actually have to understand the opinions of those you're trying to satirize. 1/10
/r/MensRights31/12/13 12:14 AM
8

Good. A female guilty of domestic violence is actually found guilty of it, and the news article doesn't report it as "Brave, desperate woman sentenced for trying to escape abusive husband". Attitudes are changing for the better.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 11:12 PM
24

You're doing a fine job. They realize no other approach but mass censorship will work anymore. Keep it up!
/r/MensRights30/12/13 11:02 PM
1

It's not clear what you're trying to say, so I took my best guess.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 12:08 PM
1

In an ideal world, people would neither rape nor falsely accuse anybody.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 09:03 AM
45

Something I've noticed is that when feminists attempt humor it always falls flat, and succeeds only in demonstrating what cruel and vicious idiots they are.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 03:26 AM
2

It really is pathetic that you have nothing better to do with your time. It would be pathetic even if this were a clever parody, but it's not, it's badly written, unfunny and stupid.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 03:04 AM
2

Just because she is wrong about climate change does not necessarily make her wrong about other things.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 02:45 AM
4

I have to confess to a bit of schadenfreude here. My favorite bit was when they said, essentially, "Noted talking head Michael Flood says such-and-such" and then spent the next paragraph explaining exactly why he's talking crap. I'm sure he's mightily pissed. Mendacious twerps like him need to be called out on their lies more often.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 02:06 AM
3

W T F
/r/MensRights30/12/13 02:00 AM
1

That's a good point. I'm starting to think it might be good if juries could find defendants not guilty more forcefully. That is, draw a distinction between finding someone not guilty because they didn't have enough evidence to convict, and finding him innocent because they're convinced he didn't do it. For example, it would make it harder for colleges to justify expelling a guy on "preponderance of evidence" when a jury of his peers declares him innocent.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 01:25 AM
3

Scots law has always been weird. On top of "Guilty" and "Not guilty", they also have "Not proven" which basically means "Innocent, but don't do it again".
/r/MensRights30/12/13 12:15 AM
1

Science has shown that children who grow up without fathers are worse off than children who grow up without mothers. Therefore it's better that children be given to fathers than mothers. And children with both parents are far better off than children with only one, which is why the default should be a rebuttable presumption of shared parenting. In single parent situations I have seen no evidence to suggest that either the mother or the father is generally better for the child and, if there is a …
/r/MensRights29/12/13 11:26 AM
3

*you're
/r/MensRights29/12/13 11:22 AM
2

Misleading title. The man didn't die.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 05:04 AM
7

It's not that Farrell switched sides. He seems to have stayed put, while the rest of feminism marched briskly into crazytown.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 12:40 AM
18

I think rage is your default setting. You're the one spending a good portion of their Christmas obsessing over this sub. It's pathetic.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 02:28 AM
-6

german soldiers followed orders against jews in wwII also, thankfully our country isnt executing deadbeats....yet. They won't. How do you leech money from a dead man?
/r/MensRights25/12/13 09:33 PM
13

It's your smug patronizing attitude that's getting downvoted.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 09:35 AM
-2

Let's not twist the facts for political gain like they do. We are better than that.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 04:34 AM
5

Southern pernicious lie center.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 04:32 AM
1

What idiotic trash.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 09:49 PM
4

Thanks for that pointless rant. Run along now.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 11:21 AM
24

It's addressed to those entitled mothers who think parenting is the exclusive domain of women, and shoot eyedaggers at any man daring to enter their little fiefdom.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 09:27 AM
9

No, in this case, the courts were right to give custody to the mother. Because this guy was murderously insane and a danger to his child.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 08:43 AM
9

Oh, you're just being an idiot. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 08:39 AM
5

I'm not sure what I've done to deserve that.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 08:21 AM
3

What?
/r/MensRights23/12/13 06:43 AM
17

An “anyone can report anyone else for anything they want anonymously,” system was probably regarded as a way that would satisfy litigious feminists. It would also help that those feminists could possibly be able to control the number of reported sex crimes by manipulating the system themselves. This. So very much this.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 03:35 AM
38

I'll give you the second best: lawyer up.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 03:18 AM
6

It's becoming more common to see ignorant calumny like this debunked in the comments. Five years ago the comments section would have been full of bobble-heads nodding in unison, but these days the morons who spew this bile are finding themselves under siege. People are becoming aware of the lies. Things are changing.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 05:00 AM
0

Did you reply to the right post?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:44 PM
3

Banning the girl would be unfair, I think. She hasn't actually done anything. If we think it's unjust that men are preemptively punished for what someone thinks they might do, it would be hypocritical to do the same to an 11 year old child. Aside from that I agree. OP ought to get in early and get it on the record that he has serious concerns.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:40 PM
6

Framed photoshop of Warren Farrell shaking hands with Hitler. Every radfem would love it. Seriously though, there's no way to win with this. It's a secret Santa, so the radfem doesn't actually know who it's from. If it's some bit of sarcastic nastiness they'll huff, "Hrmnghph typical maaaan! Grumble grumble grumble" and become further entrenched in the man-hating mindset, knowing it could have come from any one of her (?male?) colleagues and therefore blaming them collectively. If it's something…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:15 PM
2

All MRAs are the same, but NAFALT. /s
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:55 AM
0

Indeed. 4chan was probably responsible for more of the false reports than this subreddit was.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:49 AM
278

And hypocrisy is absolutely dandy if you write for Jezebel.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:41 AM
1

I'm not minimizing or disputing the issue, I'm questioning the need to simultaneously post half-a-dozen individual threads about it. One would have been enough.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:30 AM
2

That too.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:11 AM
2

Ah. Futrelle. Citing that invertebrate like he's a reliable source is a very silly thing to do. I did a little digging and it turns out that, once again, what he claims is total crap. He's claiming the thread was deleted because the mods don't want this sub to moderate its behaviour. The real reasons were because it was meta; it was talking about the men's right subreddit rather than men's rights. The moderation policy strongly discourages that. because it was a concern-trolling post coming at a…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:09 AM
-3

Why did you flood this sub with so many individual threads about essentially the same thing? Couldn't you have made one thread that lists them all?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:38 AM
10

Because one of the things the MRM opposes is sentencing disparity. Cases like this one are evidence that this may be changing. That makes it relevant for this sub.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:21 AM
4

'Cleverer' is a word here in Australia as well. The lack of it in America may be due to pronunciation; we pronounce it "clev-a-ra" while in America it would be more like "clev-rr-rr". Much more awkward. edit: I accidentally a word. Was 'is'
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:58 AM
4

Not to mention, a genuine rape report made by a man would be taken about as seriously as one naming Little Miss Muffet as the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:51 AM
1

Yes on the first two, but no on the third. I do not agree with corporal punishment.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:11 PM
1

The entire comments section condemns the article for the crock of shit that it is. That would have been unthinkable five years ago. Things are turning around.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:00 AM
1

Easy. Decide what you'd put if it was just homosexuals, then what you'd put if it was just feminists, then add and divide by two.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:59 AM
2

Confirmed troll. Don't give this thing any more attention.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:09 AM
2

Projection is a psychological coping mechanism whereby one projects ones own failings onto others. In this case, you are stupid and you are accusing others of stupidity. Proof: that I had to explain this to you.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 01:52 AM
-5

It's going to get filled to the brim with false accusations anyway. Every feminist, woman with an axe to grind and militant LGBTer will be filing complaints on a daily basis. Absolutely. I suspect that was the intent. Step 1) Make some online form that allows anonymous, unverifiable accusations. Step 2) Wait for a shitflood of false accusations from radfem types. Step 3) Conclude from the data obtained that there is a rapist lurking around every corner and behind every tree. Step 4) Profit.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 01:43 AM
2

You're projecting.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 01:37 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 01:20 AM
4

Google also "duluth model"+"feminism". The first link that comes up says this: Proponents of feminist theory acknowledge that women can also be violent in their relationships with men; however, they simply do not see the issue of women abusing men as a serious social problem, and therefore, does not deserve the same amount of attention or support as violence against women (Kurz, 1997). Seriously, how stupid do you think we are? Do you think you can waltz in with a bunch of feminist soundbites an…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 01:08 AM
1

Do you have a link to this?
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:21 AM
1

Let's hope thoughtful readers actually click through the links, see what we actually say, and how it differs from the distortions that people like Futrelle report about us.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:30 PM
7

Why the hell does everyone quote slithering filth like David Futrelle as though he is a reliable source?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:44 PM
6

It really is a terrible, badly-written hatchet job, full of deliberate lies.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:04 PM
8

Perhaps but, if it's not gender-neutral to its core right from the start, you can bet it will be selectively applied to only prosecute men.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:02 AM
6

I think you've misread. The proposed laws themselves are effectively not gender-neutral. But the article advocates that they should be, and suggests that lying about being on the pill should be included.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 08:56 AM
6

Fair point. However, if the state can extract cash from a guy in the form of child support, does it not also have an obligation to protect him from becoming a father against his will?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 06:05 AM
18

Not great, but not terrible. The majority of the article frames sabotage of contraception as something men do to women, but admits the reverse occurs as well and advocates that the laws covering it be gender-neutral. It even admits that lying about being on the pill should be included. I was stunned to see it was written by Amanda Marcotte. That's the nearest thing to even-handedness I've seen from her. I give it a decent 5/10.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:11 AM
7

"Accusing" the Easter Bunny or Sauron or Sir Lancelot is one thing. Making false claims against staff and students is something else. We rightly denounce feminists who push false accusations against innocent people, so why are some of us doing that exact thing? Yes, granted, when those feminists do it they expect to be believed and their goal is to destroy the innocent accused, which is not the case here. But that is no excuse; and the SRS hate brigade will gleefully and dishonestly equate the t…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:56 AM
6

That's just silly. The article in no way diminishes the suffering of the retired players, or makes it seem like the caregiver wives are the only people who matter.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 02:49 AM
12

Are you sure that's not satire? Poe's law and all.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:56 AM
7

That book was supposed to be a cautionary tale, not an instruction manual.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:28 AM
1

No, that in no way resembles what I wrote. Are you sure you replied to the right post?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:12 AM
0

If so, those are deliberately frivolous claims designed to demonstrate the absurdity of the reporting tool. They are not intended to be believed as serious accusations.* People like you are so used to telling preposterous lies and being taken seriously, that you've lost the ability to tell when others are using hyperbole or sarcasm. *edit: Here I was referring to clearly frivolous accusations like accusing the Easter Bunny. If people have been using the names of real people associated with Occi …
/r/MensRights17/12/13 10:55 PM
1

At least it's not Dolan. But yeah, it's silly and annoying.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 10:47 PM
5

Since he has not been found guilty at a criminal trial, that's a fair assessment.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 10:44 PM
6

Vassar is a federally accredited educational institution. Even though they are private, I assume this imposes obligations on it such as no arbitrary expulsions. In particular, I wonder if they are subject to sexual discrimination laws. I suspect so, and Peter Yu can legitimately push that in court.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 10:42 PM
3

Because we value what it does.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 04:54 AM
11

It's Amanda Marcotte. What do you expect from her except stupidity and lies?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:29 AM
3

Logic is a tool of the patriarchy to oppress women.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 11:59 PM
5

Interesting that they allow that the "victim" might not know the date or even location of the incident, but assume the "victim" will know for sure if the "perpetrator" is a student, staff, faculty member, whatever.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 11:47 PM
2

One might ask you the same question.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 11:21 PM
1

It's likely to be fake anyway.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 03:08 AM
3

That's just patriarchy backfiring on itself. /s
/r/MensRights15/12/13 09:55 PM
1

It's back up now.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 12:49 AM
1

I understand what you're getting at, but I think it's a bit of a stretch.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 11:51 AM
2

That's some serious eww material.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 07:34 AM
1

?
/r/MensRights13/12/13 05:37 AM
1

Sure. There's all sorts of regulations. Mostly these ensure that the vendor gets paid what's owed them, that the client gets what they paid for, and that the government skims a little off the top. That's not really the point though. If something is legal to do for free, then it shouldn't be an issue if someone agrees to provide money in exchange for it.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 12:33 AM
0

I agree that, ideally, sex between consenting adults should be no concern of anyone but them; and if a financial transaction is involved then that's still no-one's concern but the participants. But, to be honest, I kinda understand the reasoning here. The purpose seems to be primarily to stop forced prostitution. You don't want to make hooking illegal because if someone's been forced into the trade they ought to be able to go to the cops without being treated like a criminal. You'd like to be ab…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:43 PM
2

What error message do you get if you try this? declare misandry as Real;
/r/MensRights12/12/13 11:44 AM
6

I bet I can predict some of its features: you can't use pointers because that's too phallic, and if you make a mistake that would segfault any other language this one will scream "RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPE!!!!"
/r/MensRights12/12/13 10:19 AM
3

Oh please. There's also sport and beer. /s
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:24 AM
4

Because back when the conventions for circuit diagrams were being invented, people knew that a current was either negative charges going one way or positive charges going the other way. But they had no way of knowing which was which, so they had to guess. Unfortunately they guessed wrong.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:21 AM
2

All that may be true, but that can't be the explanation because Amanda Marcotte is not all that influential.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:02 AM
16

Here ya go: Abolishing defensive homicide will benefit female victims and offenders
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:34 AM
0

Frivolous I know, and off topic, but... does anyone else find it funny that she was caught in the act and her middle name is "Sprung"?
/r/MensRights11/12/13 05:47 AM
0

In my experience they are mostly apathetic and only barely competent. They cruise around in groups of three or four, looking very bored all the time. You get the occasional self-important little tyrant who gets off on browbeating schoolkids for no reason, but most of them are harmless.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 05:24 AM
1

It's just as ridiculous than the "WAAA phone manufacturers make phones too big for my hands those muhsodgenistic shitlords" crowd. I hope he's just taking the piss.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:27 PM
4

My comment stands nonetheless.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:06 PM
6

You edit your post after edtastic replies to you, and then you pretend to be confused why his reply seems to make no sense. People like you are the reason RightsBot exists.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:01 PM
3

Good on your niece. Blue deserves kudos also.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:50 AM
2

Namefaceguy edited his post. What I and edtastic replied to said something like "Sorry to be that guy, but that isn't rape."
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:36 AM
2

Asking people who know is research.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 05:40 AM
-1

Statutory rape is rape.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 05:38 AM
3

No problem.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:15 AM
14

Yes, it's called the Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:06 AM
16

Man criticizes female politician's party and policy positions. MUHSODGENEEEEEE!
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:51 AM
3

Nice. I LOLd.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:41 AM
3

I think that's encouraging, actually.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:38 AM
44

"So you're OK with punishing people for the misdeeds of others, just because they're in the same 50% of the population?"
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:54 AM
14

People who claim to have been raped should be taken seriously, treated with empathy and decency, and their claims investigated thoroughly. But they should not be believed uncritically, because the accused is entitled to the presumption of innocence.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:53 AM
2

Tears say more than real evidence ever could.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 01:41 AM
3

That poor kid. Why do people have to be so monstrous to each other?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:03 AM
9

You forgot the sarc mark. When making a sarcastic post, end it with /s so that people know you're not being serious.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 09:35 PM
1

It goes without saying that most of the victims of Dookhan's dishonesty will have been men.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 09:34 AM
3

It's common in places like Australia and New Zealand to give people nicknames that are the opposite of their actual characteristics. Like calling a fat guy "Slim", or a redhead "Bluey". Perhaps she's calling herself "Honourable" in the same spirit.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:18 AM
1

Years ago I heard someone jokingly refer to feminism as the nagging fear that somewhere, somehow, a man is enjoying himself. That seems to accurately describe some people.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 06:26 AM
1

My sides.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 11:50 AM
1

Michael Kimmel is a liar.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 09:06 AM
3

Name one.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 05:45 AM
2

It's fake.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 01:21 AM
2

The most encouraging thing in that article was that almost all the comments condemned and ridiculed it.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:53 AM
2

Of course it would be great if more women took up STEM field studies. Learning science teaches all kinds of good habits, like critical thought and responsible interpretation of statistics. Imagine if even a little bit of academic integrity found its way into feminist scholarship.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:35 AM
2

Anyone who takes joy in the suffering of others is not someone you want to even be facebook friends with.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:15 AM
0

What a douchenozzle.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 09:26 PM
3

Agreed.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 05:05 PM
6

Another junk article heavy on scoffing and light on content.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 03:02 AM
9

David Futrelle really is a nasty person.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 02:49 AM
3

It's not true that men cheat more than women. For every cheating man there must be a cheating woman. Or do you think there's a small pool of extremely slutty women that all the cheating men share among themselves?
/r/MensRights20/11/13 02:45 AM
1

7'3" man named "Stretch". Ha.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 12:19 AM
7

...meanwhile there's some radfem with a throwaway false-flag account gnashing her teeth in rage because this thread didn't get the responses she wanted.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 12:11 AM
5

The "gift" that keeps on giving.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 11:42 PM
2

I agree that there's no way 25% of boys have learning difficulties (and the 13.7% figure for girls is also ridiculous). Teaching standards are shit, and it's easier to fling medication left and right like Oprah (You get ritalin! And YOU get ritalin!) than to actually engage with students and control a class.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 09:33 PM
2

So many stupid people.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 06:50 AM
4

Agreed.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:09 AM
5

Lawyer. Get one.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 12:23 PM
2

AS ITS NO LONGER THEIR BODY By that logic, once the woman gives birth she no longer has any claim on the baby because it is out of her body. Is that what you really want to be arguing? Seems to me that you want the man to be just distant enough biologically to have no claim to any rights, but just close enough that the woman has a claim to his wallet.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 10:28 AM
0

I think it needs to be said that not not all women are like that. Yeah, yeah, I know, NAWALT, blah blah, yes many women are like that. I've met plenty of evil women. But I have known a lot of awesome women too. If you've been bitten by a cobra you know to respect them and keep your distance, but that doesn't mean every animal you meet is a cobra.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 10:19 AM
3

For me there wasn't a single moment. I'd be randomly browsing online and occasionally come across things like the story about a twelve year old boy who'd been statutorily raped by his teacher and was now paying child support for the resulting pregnancy; I'd read that and think it was fucked up and unjust. But I didn't really see it as one cog in a wide-ranging problem. After all, fucked up things happen every day, but that doesn't mean every fucked up thing that happens is part of a systematic t…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 10:11 AM
9

You probably posted that anonymous comment yourself.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 09:38 AM
4

because you lie and make stuff up to seem poor and hard done by. Three words for you: Projection. Projection. Projection.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 09:32 AM
3

Teach your children to respect others.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 06:17 AM
2

Because this kind of damaging insanity is only ever inflicted on boys.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 05:05 AM
9

Excellent news. I'm happy for you.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 04:56 AM
2

Alphabetical order?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:59 PM
1

That must be a massive relief.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:38 PM
9

How about "Megging"?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 11:34 AM
4

Look at that awesome grin! He's having a great time.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:16 AM
6

I don't dig the comment section in the original article (right wing version of RawStory in there). Yeah, it's a lot of "All demmercrats are kiddie fiddlers" wingnut ranting. That's a special kind of crazy right there.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 09:50 AM
2

I have no idea what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 05:21 AM
1

It's satire.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 05:11 AM
1

That's one of the stupidest things I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 12:43 AM
5

Not just fired, but would probably wind up on a sex offenders list.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 06:52 AM
1

Doesn't work for me either.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 03:47 AM
1

What an evil bitch.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 09:32 AM
1

I liked this bit: if you keep attacking men as a group, they will eventually start acting as a group
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:32 AM
1

It wasn't great, but also wasn't as completely dismissive and contemptuous as I expected.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 05:19 AM
1

Adding more accurate info to an encyclopedia never diminishes it. Except if it becomes so diluted with trivial facts (or trivial nonsense) that finding anything useful becomes difficult. But that's drifting off-topic.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 10:31 PM
3

Maybe Joel Apsden is so used to making grandiose and blatantly false claims, expecting them to be taken seriously, that he has lost the ability to detect sarcasm or hyperbole.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:45 PM
2

The bus driver described things as they should be; the five year old girl described them as they are.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 12:44 PM
2

Starts at about 14:00, for those of you who don't want to watch the whole thing.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 04:51 AM
2

Actually, this is from even before WWII.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 07:18 AM
3

Good dog!
/r/MensRights14/09/13 06:47 AM
2

I just read the "notable cases" section, how disgusting can you get? Guys being wrongfully convicted or held hostage getting arrested again because they couldn't pay child support while they were locked up. How can you call that anything other than persecution?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 02:27 AM
5

Nice!
/r/MensRights07/09/13 09:12 PM
4

In this situation the man had exactly the same expectation that the marriage would produce a child. If he wants to try for a pregnancy with a new partner, can he get the ex-wife to pay for fertility treatments for them?
/r/MensRights07/09/13 09:08 PM
1

At least we know how to use capitalization.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 11:24 PM
3

Because I want nothing to do with a group that hates me for just existing.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 05:12 AM
3

Yup, in "The Wee Free Men" by Terry Pratchett.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:47 PM
0

Blocking him. You would have known that if you'd actually read my first post.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:21 PM
1

Do two wrongs make a right if the wrongs are not equal in magnitude?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:58 AM
1

Link broken.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 03:08 AM
5

Who is Emily Sipiora, and why should we care that she gets her jollies from mocking lonely men on a dating website?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 02:56 AM
7

The dude was obnoxious. But guess what? There are lots of obnoxious people on the internet. If someone is hassling you online, you block them and move on. Doxing people and dragging their families into it is extremely low behaviour.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:07 AM
4

It is if you're getting child support. Oh the irony.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:29 PM
27

what do feminists and white knights say about women who violate a man and "sexually assault" him? "Man up."
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:39 AM
11

If it was anonymous, how did you know it was a girl?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:22 AM
43

Exploiting peoples' generosity for your own personal gain. Nasty, nasty stuff.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 09:14 AM
2

You're joking. Right here, on the sidebar of this sub, is a link entitled "Discussion on why feminism is not a solution for men's issues", itself containing over a dozen links to examples of organized feminism actively trying to sweep men's problems under the carpet. You'll find examples of feminists disrupting lectures on male suicide by barricading the doors and screaming obscenities at attendees, many examples of feminist organizations campaigning against equality under the law for men, and m…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 09:11 AM
2

I just assumed it would be the more dishonest and unethical of the radfem loons who'd do this. They would have the most to gain by it. Post something innocuous and inoffensive, get people here to leave upvotes and favourable comments. Then change the original post to say something garishly misogynistic, and run trumpeting far and wide what horrible woman haters we are. I don't know who else would bother, except maybe garden variety trolls who just do it for a laugh, but you get those morons ever…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 08:49 AM
3

...so the reason we need the bot is the reason we need the MRM.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:14 AM
1

It's up there now.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 02:58 AM
3

Bravo!
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:33 AM
17

I think someone looks for penises everywhere.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 07:41 AM
2

Has his twitter account been hacked or something?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 10:54 PM
5

I call bullshit. If feminists wanted abused and mistreated men to be heard, some time down the track when the "patriarchy" is destroyed, why are they currently spending so much of their time and effort trying to downplay those problems and shaming men for speaking up?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 11:02 AM
1

Need to be logged in to read it. Can you give us a summary?
/r/MensRights04/08/13 08:43 AM
11

Wait, what? The judge who convicted Mr. Nelson is the same one who denied the request for DNA examination. Isn't this a huge conflict of interest, as Judge Byrd has a personal incentive to prevent one (i.e., covering his own ass)? And then to sack Sharon Snyder as retaliation for making said ass-covering impossible is just vindictive. What a slimy turd of a person.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 02:09 AM
1

Meh. This bug report is a year old and both the original "bug" reporter and the developer responding to it seemed cordial and reasonable, even if the original complaint was pretty meritless. Not sure what the big deal is.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:45 PM
9

It's very very hard to reason a person out of a viewpoint that they did not reason their way into.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 12:15 AM
2

See, this is why nobody liked her. "Waaah! I was completely loyal to Kevin Rudd... until I knifed him in the back!" "Waaah! It's OK for me and my cronies to stab Rudd in the back, but when he does the same to me it's misogyny."
/r/MensRights26/07/13 11:48 PM
10

Because he wants to be a field agent instead of an analyst.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 11:33 PM
17

HERpes
/r/MensRights21/07/13 04:08 AM
5

Or saddle you with child support for any resulting pregnancy.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:57 PM
4

What those coppers did was shady and immoral, and it shouldn't be allowed, but that does not make it rape.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 09:17 AM
11

Gillard took office in the same way that she left it, by a leadership challenge. When she knifed Kevin Rudd three years ago, the reasons were not communicated properly to the Australian people and as a result her prime ministership has lacked legitimacy in the eyes of many voters. That's part of the reason she was so unpopular, and it has nothing to with her gender. Another reason, related to the first, was her continued inability to "sell" her policies. She just couldn't get her message across,…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 03:36 AM
20

Three sentence summary: "Men commit suicide because it's their fault. Also patriarchy. Once I was refused a job for wearing trousers."
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:33 PM
2

Here's how she should have done it: "Gregory, I am breaking up with you. Please pack your things and move out of my house."
/r/MensRights28/06/13 06:02 AM
23

I'm sure this is going to real popular with bars and pubs. I mean, what could possibly be better for business than calling your customers wife beaters and child abusers just for enjoying a cold brew? /sarc
/r/MensRights28/06/13 05:59 AM
1

Meh. The tone of the whole thing is off-putting. It reads like a fundamentalist creed with a healthy dose of paranoid ranting.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 05:56 AM
1

Sometimes people say something they mean, and then backtrack when it's pointed out to them that they've been a douchenozzle. Other times people will mean to say one thing and accidentally blurt out something that sounds much worse than they intended. I've never known how to tell the difference.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 05:43 AM
1

Here I am being "that guy", but it has to be said: how exactly is this a mens' rights issue specifically? Anyway, what's the big deal about the t-shirt? Is the NRA not a legal organisation? Isn't the barrow they push about the right to bear arms, which is enshrined in the American constitution?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 05:36 AM
1

What is this I don't even
/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:35 AM
3

This guy's trollometer readings are off the chart.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 03:48 AM
43

Scenario: Female puts toilet seat up when she's finished. Some time later, another female worker arrives and finds that the seat is up. Blames male workers for not leaving it down. Everyone freaks the fuck out over a trivial issue.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 10:40 PM
10

I need MR because rape victims shouldn't have to pay child support to their rapists.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 09:53 PM
1

I like how the picture the BBC have selected seems to be a silhouette of Zack Braff trying to give a high five to a cowering woman.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 11:34 AM
10

It's good to see that nearly every one of the commenters on the article have condemned it as being stupid trash.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:15 AM
15

Ah yes, an elf with a bow and arrow. Cliche much?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 11:35 AM
10

She might do that anyway, even if he doesn't report.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:25 AM
86

Couldn't be because many fans would prefer the movies not to deviate too far from the book. No, of course not. Has to be sexism.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:24 AM
1

What does "outraging modesty" even mean? Whatever it means, it is manifestly unjust that the accuser's say-so in the absence of any actual evidence is enough to convict someone. "Justice" Roshan Dalvi is an evil and stupid person, unworthy of his office.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:19 AM
8

Why would it even matter if he is gay? There is nothing wrong with that. It would be odd if a gay man were to enter into a long term heterosexual partnership, but the private arrangements adults make among themselves are only their own business.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:13 AM
2

I have mixed views on Julia Gillard. One one hand, I disagree with her approach to gender relations and every time I hear her on the news or radio she comes across as a deeply unimpressive person, blabbering condescendingly in an annoying voice. On the other hand, I agree with her on several other policies, such as climate change and industrial relations. I'll probably be voting for her in the next election, if only because the leader of the opposition, Tony Abbott, is certifiably batshit insane…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:05 AM
32

This must be a slap in the face to all the fathers who have been excluded from their children's lives, despite wanting to be involved.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:00 AM
3

To be fair, the article doesn't say whether or not there was evidence besides the girl's account. For all we know, she really was assaulted; just not by this guy. There had to have been more pointing to this guy. Article says the assaulter was wearing a ski mask, so it isn't like the girl could have accused any specific man, and I doubt whether London's finest are in the habit of picking out people at random to arrest out of moral panic.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:41 AM
9

Notice how immaturity is defined as "doing stuff he likes" and maturity is defined as "doing stuff she approves of".
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:06 AM
8

Typical propaganda, in that they perpetuate the myth that only men are perpetrators and only women are victims. Better than most, in that they actually show responsible, empathetic non-rapist men.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:44 PM
2

Let's also aim for a 50/50 proportion in gender studies classes.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 05:26 AM
1

How the hell can someone be locked up in a psych hospital for seven years without the staff noticing he's actually sane?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:15 AM
2

I don't have a problem with it. It seems sympathetic towards the father. Yes, he is shown being excluded and ignored at the hospital, but it is actually portrayed as unfair. There is very little of the "let's mock the bumbling useless maaaaaaan" attitude here.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:54 AM
1

"...the concept is the latest funky, hi-tech way to shut down opinions you dislike without making it too obvious that is exactly what you are up to." Exactly.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 10:25 PM
2

It would be overkill to mandate DNA tests of every newborn. It would be enough to require it only when child support is applied for.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 10:12 PM
16

If it had been a girl that defended a classmate, would the school have treated her the same way? Actually by the sounds of it, they probably would have.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 10:09 PM
2

I know I've read something along those lines but I can't find it ATM. Maybe I'm not using the right google keywords. I'll PM you if I come across that material again. If you look for "feminism" and "friend zone" you'll find dubious sentiments along those lines.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 10:15 AM
5

Is this part of a false-flag campaign to make us all look like FAUX "news" watching, anti-science wingnuts?
/r/MensRights01/06/13 04:43 AM
1

After all any court that harms the innocent can only be said to be acting in God's image. Tell that to the offensively corrupt kangaroo courts set up by the very, very atheist Soviet Union. This is not about religion.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:27 PM
1

Welcome aboard.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:23 PM
17

It's based on the incorrect assumption that, when a man is attracted to a woman, she is reduced in his mind to nothing more than a collection of curves and orifices. It's part of the narrative among many feminists that men cannot respect someone they are sexually attracted to. And that is bullshit.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:16 PM
6

Yes, well, FOX "news" is stupid and wrong. About almost everything, not just this.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:15 AM
1

Well, that's a mental image I didn't need.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:56 AM
26

Another moron who thinks the worth of a man is measured by his usefulness or desirability to women.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:36 AM
2

She's got a smile like Jack Nicholson's Joker.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 03:53 AM
1

If you're going to break up with her, you already said most of what needs to be said in the first sentence of your second paragraph.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 11:01 AM
3

...and the news site is called krem.com. :/
/r/MensRights19/05/13 05:13 AM
3

I think it's a disgusting thing to do.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 07:58 AM
4

Public attention as a limited resource? Interesting idea. I never thought of it that way.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 01:13 PM
2

We already had this list copypasted at us many times, so I'll repeat what I said in reply to a previous thread on the same topic that was deleted: Firstly, the entire piece is disingenous crap. It is no longer possible to pretend men face no discrimination and disadvantages just because they're men, so the denialist approach now seems to be to twist all those problems into feminist talking points. "Feminists don't want you to put up with X. The idea that women can only do Y and Z is part of the …
/r/MensRights17/05/13 10:14 AM
1

That only applies to things that really are limited resources, like money. OP, and I, are talking about things like equality under the law.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 09:56 AM
18

There appears to be this feeling that equality is a limited resource, and that if men get their fair share of it there will be less to go around.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:30 AM
8

Wrong. Consent to sex is not consent to parenthood. It isn't for women, and it shouldn't be for men.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 04:26 AM
2

Nice work!
/r/MensRights11/05/13 06:10 AM
17

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 10:13 PM
13

Wait, lemme get this straight. They're bitching because they can't have a second feminist society on top of the one they already have? Really?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:52 PM
1

You're probably right. It might be unfair to say feminists never speak our or agree with us, just because they don't label themselves as such here. On the other hand, if they're worried about the "bashfest" then it is probably because they want to distance themselves from an ideology that is (rightly) held in low esteem here, and that's because the loony radfem fringe dominate the airwaves over there. Here, have an upvote for being thought provoking.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 09:18 AM
3

If you don't identify with feminism, that's fine. My point still stands; we keep getting told "not all feminists are like that", but we never ever hear of the feminists who "aren't like that" speaking up when the looneys behave abusively. You appear to think that when the crazies who claim to be on our side make a lot of noise, it's our responsibility to not let them drown us out. Do you hold feminists responsible for the excesses of the radfem fringe?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:33 AM
3

Where are you "moderate and reasonable" feminists? When the radfems spew their toxic bile, do you challenge them? When they block doors and pull fire alarms to stop lectures at universities, do you condemn them? When they push blatantly misandrist social policies, do you protest against them? When they fabricate and distort statistics, do you call them out on their lies? Of course not. So don't tell me that "real" feminists don't like the radfems. Prove it to me.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:58 AM
2

I think it looks like crass and tasteless crap.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 02:19 AM
26

Wouldn't this also serve as a lesson to men, that false accusations could happen to them?
/r/MensRights03/05/13 11:34 AM
3

Oh, well, if they were in on it then that's different. Hell with 'em.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 06:40 AM
1

While it is right and proper that Achane's child has been returned to him, this must really suck for the foster parents. Another two victims of this liar's maliciousness.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 05:11 AM
1

There's one difficulty that I haven't seen addressed yet. If you look at cases like Jon Montgomery's, where the girl got caught looking at internet porn by her parents, panicked, and pointed the finger at a neighbour who had moved away, that guy got convicted with zero physical evidence. The only reason he was eventually released is that she lated admitted she made it up. If she could face jail time herself for making the false accusation, she would not have ever come forward and Montgomery woul…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 04:08 AM
14

If she fabricated the whole thing, then she should serve every day behind bars that Grissom did. But let's not wish rape on anyone, we're better than that.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 03:53 AM
3

Yes. You are absolutely right.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 10:50 AM
4

Only guilty of caring too much perjury and contempt of court. FTFH
/r/MensRights27/04/13 04:48 AM
7

Fuck that. All this guy ever wanted to do was help people, and he gets shut down and hounded into an early grave for it. Very, very sad.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:37 AM
3

Eh. It didn't actually read as though they were awkwardly trying to tiptoe around the phrase.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:34 AM
1

The first step towards getting well is admitting you have a problem. Good for you.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:53 PM
5

I object to your use of the word "inherent". It contains the phrase "in her", which is rapey as all fuck.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:34 AM
1

Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 01:20 PM
1

Thanks for giving us the opportunity to prove we downvote false flag assholes.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 01:19 PM
3

That article correlates well with my memories of school. In my experience, the perceived disadvantage to girls was addressed by discouraging boys rather than encouraging girls.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 01:39 AM
3

Yeah, I think it's pretty clear why you're here.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:12 PM
1

We already had this list copypasted at us last week. It was a load of rubbish then, and it's stale rubbish now. Firstly, the entire piece is disingenous crap. It is no longer possible to pretend men face no discrimination and disadvantages just because they're men, so the denialist approach now seems to be to twist all those problems into feminist talking points. "Feminists don't want you to put up with X. The idea that women can only do Y and Z is part of the patriarchy because <insert feeble b…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:20 AM
0

Then they should know better.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 05:19 AM
2

It happened to John Montgomery as well.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 05:28 AM
1

I agree. It's very encouraging to see that.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:59 AM
6

Um, asking people who know IS research.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:50 AM
1

Maybe it gives them access to the car pool lane.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 08:25 AM
35

It's a shame meme pics are not allowed here, because I have a sudden mental image of Dr. Evil doing air quotes and saying "Working on" in a sarcastic voice. If someone said they were going to work on something for you, but then either did nothing at all or actually made the problem worse on purpose, you'd push 'em out of the way and get it done yourself. And that is EXACTLY why the Men's Rights Movement exists.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 08:21 AM
1

This person is clearly a troll.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 06:21 AM
9

That Marwa Hamad seems to me to be a massive hypocrite. Complains that [womens issues] "have historically and continue to today to be silenced" while working hard to censor and silence dissent herself. Claims to be "talking about supporting men", what utter crap. Obviously the most supportive thing you can do for someone is to pretend their problems aren't real, deliberately misinterpret their opinions as personal affronts, and shut down any means for them to voice their concerns. With "friends"…
/r/MensRights24/03/13 12:43 AM
19

What a selfish, deceitful bitch.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 10:18 PM
6

Get out the butterfy nets and the jackets that button up at the back. This person is insane. Wow.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 04:41 AM
1

Well, "inadvertently" means by accident and you want the poster to be more along the lines of "Look at the scary disgusting man". How about "aggressively"?
/r/MensRights15/03/13 09:00 AM
1

Looks good, but I don't know about "inadvertently" in the bottom left panel.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 08:34 AM
1

Look into using the LaTeX typesetting language; it keeps track of this stuff for you.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:07 AM
153

I don't get it. The man is doing the responsible thing by staying at home. He's got an infectious disease that could make other people sick. That's shameful and weak now?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 05:56 AM
1

I don't believe in capital punishment, but if anyone deserves to die that way it's people like her.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:55 AM
8

That article is satire, surely.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 05:39 AM
1

No problem.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 09:35 AM
2

In that 3rd poster, you've mis-spelled "dad" as "dead".
/r/MensRights01/03/13 05:35 AM
4

Presumably because it takes a date or two to before it becomes clear who's in the 30% and who's in the 70.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 02:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter