TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hour-Mission7829 Archive

View 46 posts and 350 comments by Hour-Mission7829 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1296

False AccusationHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights14/01/22 10:57 PM
928

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights23/12/21 02:00 AM
706

Legal RightsHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights20/09/21 01:53 AM
539

DiscriminationHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:21 PM
443

FeminismHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights06/04/22 10:25 AM
409

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights18/09/21 02:04 AM
314

FeminismHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:51 AM
283

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights20/06/21 02:49 PM
251

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights18/08/21 12:36 AM
203

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights27/02/22 01:18 AM
198

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:10 PM
179

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights11/11/21 06:18 PM
157

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights03/03/22 11:15 PM
150

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights11/09/21 10:05 PM
138

FeminismHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights29/01/22 02:11 AM
102

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:11 PM
102

DiscriminationHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights14/06/21 02:03 PM
93

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights16/02/22 02:40 AM
58

Marriage/ChildrenHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights26/03/22 05:35 PM
57

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights01/03/22 09:17 PM
53

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights29/08/21 05:03 PM
51

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights26/02/22 02:35 PM
46

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights14/06/21 02:51 AM
44

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights09/11/21 08:09 PM
43

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights01/09/21 01:29 PM
43

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights10/11/21 08:08 PM
37

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights17/08/21 03:23 AM
37

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights17/09/21 04:29 PM
37

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights24/06/21 03:28 AM
31

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights21/06/22 02:50 AM
31

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights17/08/21 10:25 PM
31

FeminismHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights29/09/21 01:52 AM
29

GeneralHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights03/11/21 09:45 PM
26

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights05/10/21 05:20 PM
25

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights05/04/22 02:11 AM
23

FeminismHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights11/04/22 10:18 PM
16

Legal RightsHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights30/09/21 03:20 AM
10

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights04/07/21 03:03 AM
8

Marriage/ChildrenHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights06/01/22 05:56 AM
6

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights12/09/21 03:16 PM
5

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights05/08/21 06:24 PM
3

FeminismHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights13/12/21 07:13 AM
3

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights20/06/21 05:38 PM
1

Hour-Mission7829/r/MensRights24/05/22 02:08 AM
1

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights01/12/21 08:04 PM
1

Social IssuesHour-Mission7829/r/MensRights01/12/21 07:58 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Idk. Prevalence rates are hard to confirm.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 10:06 AM
32

Women abuse children more than men so matriarchy causes oppression against children
/r/MensRights13/06/22 09:07 PM
5

Being diagnosed doesn’t really help much. Most people won’t know you’re autistic and you might receive the same treatment as any other autist despite being a spectrum. Plus it might make your parents infantilize you much more once you’re diagnosed
/r/MensRights12/06/22 05:38 PM
19

Dude being diagnosed doesn’t help much. Most treatment doesn’t get rid of symptoms because there’s no meds and most people you meet won’t know you’re autistic and they’ll still stigmatize you hell even if they know you’re autistic that won’t always help Besides autistic men get treated worse by society which is worse than a mere diagnosis (which like I said doesn’t help as much as you think) Besides most autism treatment treats us all the same like we’re homogeneous when we’re a spectrum
/r/MensRights12/06/22 03:03 AM
11

Yeah many people see friendless people as red flags And lack of social circle prevents opportunities to meet women
/r/MensRights12/06/22 03:01 AM
36

Yep. I’ve read a lot of studies showing women have better social skills, have more close friends, are more likely to have a best friend, less likely to have no friends and are more likely to maintain friendships from a long time ago I also read women are more likely to become friends upon meeting each other compared to when men meet each other. Women have it easier with dating because men pursue Yet lonely men are more stigmatized than lonely women
/r/MensRights12/06/22 01:12 AM
27

People act like autistic women have it worse just by being underdiagnosed
/r/MensRights12/06/22 01:09 AM
2

It’s mostly because it’s a neurodevelopmental and social disability
/r/MensRights12/06/22 01:09 AM
3

I wish I could but it’d take a lot of guts.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 01:08 AM
33

Autistic men born before 1990 were never diagnosed either Besides, being diagnosed in young adulthood is not as bad as all the social stigmatization autistic men face
/r/MensRights12/06/22 01:01 AM
17

Switch the genders and this would’ve made headlines If I post this on r/autism I’d be downvoted to oblivion
/r/MensRights11/06/22 08:48 PM
1

Only a low percentage do, that's not SOME, some would be like 40% or something. Its a really low percent, especially when most murders aren't DV-related. And no, if you look at those articles, it wasn't a lot less reported than now. It was reported just as often as now. Also, anecdotes are NOT evidence. Anecdotes can vary and even modern people might give similar anecdotes, and anecdotes will never debunk empirical or statistical evidence. Many people from long ago would tell how many got arrest…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 03:44 PM
11

The vast majority of domestic abuse does NOT result in murder. And yes, it is a myth. And it was reported perhaps as often as nowadays. "I can recall half a dozen instances from my home town where it was common knowledge a man was beating his wife and/or kids but nobody reported it as would happen today" This is merely an unverifiable anecdote. Anecdotes can vary and you cannot generalize based off an anecdote. Anecdotes don't necessarily represent what generally happens. Studies show people are…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 03:02 AM
10

it was never a private matter. its a myth. domestic abuse was illegal and extremely frowned upon then too
/r/MensRights09/06/22 12:58 AM
18

women killing husbands might happen more than we think, many using poisoning or hire hitmen to get away with it more. and police won't suspect a woman, so men who do the same strategy might be less able to get away with such strategies.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 12:56 AM
1

i bet you only noticed the threads that suit your point of view. yeah they sometimes mention that shit, but not the vast majority of threads. there's WAY more threads about self loathing or suicide than loathing or killing others. you just don't wanna admit it but this is true according to statistics i've read and it's true if you look at every thread indiscriminately.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 09:45 AM
1

dude most of them don't even come in contact with any women and they spend more time talking to other incels than to women. they don't usually send threats to women and most of the dumb messages from alleged incels featured on inceltear sound so satirirically laughable that it was prolly some inceltear member creating a fake account messaging themselves posing as incels for karma points. if you go on incel forums people like you are so paranoid about, they threaten and insult each other more tha…
/r/MensRights16/05/22 02:22 AM
1

most of the people who use these forums only resorted to these forums because society stigmatizes virgins and laughs at them, and whenever a sexually active person talks about how their partner isn't good at sex or how their sex life sucks we have tons of mainstream website articles, advertisements and tiktok videos helping them out but whenever a person talks about how depressed they are because they haven't experience sex or relationships in their life, people either trivialize their issues by…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 09:21 PM
5

i think societal stigma against virgins caused them
/r/MensRights26/04/22 01:28 AM
10

Dude your anecdote isn’t evidence. Some of the guys on those forums I observed DID have hobbies and on polls, most went outside at least somewhat often. No, refusing to think about women doesn’t make them some sudden chick magnet
/r/MensRights18/04/22 12:35 PM
8

incel just means involuntary celibacy. most misogynistic men are sexually experienced and most virgin men are not misogynists. besides, the incel forums inceltears target tend to have only 10,000 members (a majority of whom are banned/inactive).
/r/MensRights17/04/22 11:36 PM
-1

it's not necessarily assault just by grabbing something unless you're intentionally attacking them
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:22 AM
1

that isn't even my point. i didn't say that, but women's breasts are NOT equivalent to men's. no, grabbing a man's chest or touching it any way is NOT SA
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:20 AM
0

if what you're saying is objectively false yes i will.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:19 AM
1

sure, but thats rare.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:18 AM
-2

it's not sexual because you don't have breasts. sorry but facts don't care about equality.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:17 AM
1

go take a pic of a topless 11 year old right now and see where that takes you. in fact, go grab her chest WITHOUT any sexual motives and you'll be a sex offender. and those young kids btw aren't 11, they're often like 3
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:17 AM
1

their cultures are different and men in this culture are NOT going to suddenly stop viewing breasts as sexual because you told them to. there's some cultures where outright nudity is probably normalized, doesn't mean its ok to be nude in front of kids. there's even cultures where molesting your own children was a custom (NO JOKE) but that doesn't make it ok. what works for one culture doesn't necessarily work for another. so no, commanding men to think breasts aren't sexual isn't going to help. …
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:16 AM
1

if theres kids around no
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:12 AM
1

ok you are seriously delusional. Do you understand that INFANTS and BREASTFEEDING are completely different contexts compared to a 7 year old child who doesn't need to be breastfed anymore being around a topless woman. It doesn't matter if they "don't care" or not. Believe it or not, for many children who get molested, they are initially confused by what happened or feel neutral towards it and don't experience trauma until later on when they understand what happened (look up Susan Clancy who elab…
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:12 AM
0

no excuses? it's stupid to say a woman can be topless in front of children but a man being topless in front of them at a pool or a beach is no issue for self-evident reasons. it doesn't matter if it is this petty. stop acting like equality is the only thing that matters. in this case, it isn't important. if you think a woman can be topless in front of children, you're sick. plain and simple. it might be inequality but it's still justified to prohibit that. men and women aren't biologically the s…
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:07 AM
0

no it isn't. people don't necessarily touch a man's chest for sexual reasons. hell, people don't always grope a butt for sexual reasons (although sometimes yes). and no, it isn't sexual assault because you aren't touching anything sexual. it's not sexual assault to touch someone's ear becaue you find ears attractive.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:05 AM
-30

it's not necessarily assault
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:33 PM
-36

it's not sexual assault because a man's chest isn't sexual unlike a woman's chest.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:33 PM
-11

if they grabbed your butt? yes. if they grabbed your chest? no. is it an invasion of person space? yes. is it sexual assault unless it's your butt? no.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:32 PM
-9

because there's nothing sexual about a man's chest. and before you say "but women's breasts aren't sexual", just remember that people don't sexualize feet or any of those things half as often as breasts, and breasts weren't just some peculiar fetish a minority of people have unlike feet. Many people are attracted to breasts, and it has been considered sexual for that reason and telling people repeatedly "stop sexualizing breasts they're not sexual" isn't going to stop them from changing their se…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:07 PM
0

honestly equality goes too far here. ngl. although equality gender is good there are exceptions in these circumstances. i do believe the phrase never hit a woman instead of never hit anyone is a double standard but there's a reason why grabbing a man's chest isn't sexual assault but a woman's chest is. but this? this isn't unequivocally ok. 11 year old girls topless in public. that's wrong. plain and simple. unless an adult woman is in an area where there's no children, her being topless in publ…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:24 PM
10

doesnt really make it ok. there's a reason grabbing a woman's chest is sexual assault but not a man's chest. maybe if they're in an area where only adults walk it's fine. but legal to be topless in front of children. no. that's not ok. no questions and no, topless 11 year old girls shouldn't be legal either.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:11 PM
1

And this
/r/MensRights12/04/22 04:59 AM
3

I’m pretty sure the two are linked.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 12:40 AM
4

They claim to be uncomfortable with these chivalrous ideas but their actions speak differently
/r/MensRights12/04/22 12:39 AM
2

Sometimes I hear “women and males”. It just depends on the situation. It’s not even offensive regardless of how odd it is nor is it a scientific word. Plenty of research papers say men or women and plenty of casual contexts say males and females Who cares? It’s just a formal word. The fact that people are bitching about the word female is just stupid
/r/MensRights10/04/22 05:13 PM
4

it's odd how you instantly think it's a serial baby rapist when the title says "sex offender" when even those who piss in public are sex offenders.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 11:20 PM
1

yes but their odds are super low
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:40 PM
1

nope, the fact that she has the ability to get pregnant is irrelevant to the fact that she has NO IDEA WHATSOEVER what it's like UNLESS she is INVOLUNTARILY pregnant, even VOLUNTARY pregnancy doesn't show you even remotely what it's like to have to be pregnant against your will. In fact, a man who will father the baby and possibly have to provide for them will be WAY more affected, the fact the fetus doesn't exist inside his stomach doesn't change that. in fact, he's often expected to provide fo…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:39 PM
1

because men have to provide for the baby, they have to be breadwinners and do this and that and etc etc etc so he's just as affected and just as much under stress. and if he doesn't do this shit, he's called a deadbeat. he's just as affected. and no, most women don't suffer PTSD after giving birth, most women might go through some degree of stress, sure, but not the extreme shit you speak of. you're exaggerating. it's just a normal thing women go through and nothing more. ​ also, 1 in 10 and 1 i…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:34 PM
1

i read it's 8% and 20% is still a minority. 80% is a vast majority ​ https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/staying-healthy-during-pregnancy/4-common-pregnancy-complications
/r/MensRights07/04/22 01:13 AM
1

look it up yourself. i doubt a MAJORITY of pregnant women have serious pregnancy complications. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/staying-healthy-during-pregnancy/4-common-pregnancy-complications ​ just 8%
/r/MensRights07/04/22 01:13 AM
0

most women have healthy pregnancies yes some have complications but not a majority at all
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:51 PM
0

how?
/r/MensRights06/04/22 08:49 PM
2

and alabama's governor was a woman
/r/MensRights06/04/22 08:46 PM
4

that argument is dumb because most pregnancies aren't gonna involve health risks (idk how many involuntary pregnancies do) but because men still have to spend all his money and investment in the babies or get condemned as a deadbeat, which damages his reputation, which does harm him. he still is often involved.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 08:45 PM
6

if men were to say they don't care about abortion feminsits would cry "privilege! you aren't paying attention to patiarchy because you're privileged" or would call them misogynists for being apathetic for women losing abortion rights.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 08:44 PM
1

Nope because she's gonna want him to raise the child or pay for the child and if he doesn't he's called a deadbeat dad. he's still responsible for the fetus's existence, so his opinion is still relevant at least if she wants him to raise the child or if they're a couple. The fact that the fetus isn't sitting inside his stomach doesn't change that. His opinion is more relevant, according to your logic, than a woman who has never been pregnant in her life.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 02:10 PM
5

that argument is so stupid. no it isn't a possibility if she's abstinent. should abstinent women never have an opinion or work for the government laws on abortion? plus, not only that, but if she uses birth control all the fuckin time and doesn't try to become pregnant, there's NO possibility whatsoever. and by the way having the possibility does NOT in any way mean you know what it's like to get pregnant. kinda like how having the possibility of IMPREGNATING a woman does NOT mean you know what …
/r/MensRights06/04/22 02:08 PM
7

That’s unrealistic because most female governors probably never got involuntarily pregnant and we can’t only allow involuntarily pregnant people exclusively to work this part of the government Either way, your argument for who can regulate abortions has the same logic as who can have an opinion so your argument was pretty much debunked by my original post.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:32 AM
1

when did i say that?
/r/MensRights06/04/22 09:51 AM
1

no it isn't. homophobia doesn't reduce the gay population. the fact that we don't live in hunter-gatherer times anymore doesn't stop that women are attracted to men who are tall or muscular or who are hypermasculine or who are assertive etc. the fact that age gaps are heavily stigmatized doesn't prevent the fact that older men still find 20 year olds the most attractive. the fact that women might have their own jobs and money doesn't stop that they still value a man's job and money. etc etc etc …
/r/MensRights05/04/22 04:49 PM
-1

when a man believes a woman is obliged to fuck him
/r/MensRights05/04/22 04:43 PM
0

Our biology doesn’t respond to new norms and societal structures though
/r/MensRights05/04/22 12:47 PM
1

i think because he's talking about statutory rape happening
/r/MensRights03/04/22 10:17 PM
3

"most male rape victims are probably children" nope, many are adults according to CDC.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:52 PM
1

https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1733457
/r/MensRights30/03/22 08:06 PM
2

90% of sexism toward women is benevolent sexism not hostile sexism
/r/MensRights27/03/22 12:11 AM
4

I bet controlling for aggravating factors it still holds true
/r/MensRights26/03/22 09:00 PM
2

You’d be naive if you think not that many people stigmatize virgins
/r/MensRights12/03/22 12:26 AM
2

he wasn't "ok", he was literally ok. just because he wanted a relationship doesn't mean he's unwilling to or hates being friends. and you said he didn't ask her out until TWENTY YEARS LATER. that's not early on at all.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 03:42 PM
1

they weren't "best friends", they were literally best friends. just because he eventually asked her out, doesn't mean he only befriended her for sex. i mean they were literally friends since CHILDHOOD before boys and girls pursue each other. the attraction may have never developed until later on. maybe that's why he eventually asked her out, or maybe he was initially shy to ask her out and so he decided to be friends at first to get to know her before he could decide if he would ask her out. Peo…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 03:28 PM
13

Most guys who use the word Friendzone don’t even have nice guy syndrome. Social media just emphasizes the ones who do, giving that impression. Just because a guy asks out a friend of his doesn’t mean he thinks she’s obliged to have sex with him, even if he’s upset about being Friendzoned. Nor does it mean he will end his friendship. Hell, some guys get friendzoned by a woman they just met and weren’t friends with to begin with.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:47 PM
2

They looked at 9 schools and how do you know they're party schools? did it reveal the name of the unis? and the sample is THOUSANDS in what I cited from BJS.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:49 AM
2

"MUH MISOGYNY!!!!!1" nope it's NOT misogyny. just because a fact is "MiSoGyNiStiC" doesn't make it false. facts don't give a flying fuck about women or morals. pointing out that men are get raped by women just as much as men raping women is NOT misogyny, it's just a proven fact that the media ignores. Those studies DID mention the workplace at some point, and also, abusers might not be honest in surveys but why would one gender be more honest than another? besides, it's anonymous and if most rap…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:43 AM
2

Here's the problem. many of those statistics show what happened IN THE WORKPLACE NOT IN GENERAL. and sometimes they include unwanted comments or catcalls as "violence and crime". Additionally in some surveys men might never admit to being victims of sexual violence. And not only that, but some of the women who experienced DV maybe experience mild slapping on occasion rather than the vicious violence the media likes to emphasize. in fact, most DV is mutual violence and in non-recriprocal cases, w…
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:30 PM
2

Your argument is flawed because not all men forced to penetrate experience it from their significant other and older birth cohorts most likely never were raped in the past year because usually young men ages 18-24 get forced to penetrate the most. a third of them can be over 25 but he's usually under 45 or even under 35. The study is NOT BS and samples a large sample of college students. it reveals that college women are just as sexually violent as college men. and CDC surveys about being forced…
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:13 PM
2

No they're not, or at least not recent birth cohorts. I already explained this.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:24 PM
2

no. it's because, like i said, older birth cohorts of men maybe are less likely to have been forced to penetrate even when they were young (men ages 18-24 are the most likely to be forced to penetrate). it's possible that forced to penetrate rates skyrocketed in the modern era. For example, in countries where women have more status, men are more likely to be raped. Women had more status in the past few decades after the 50s. Or maybe older birth cohorts of men are less likely to admit it ever ha…
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:21 PM
2

dude, more than half are raped after 18. Also, although about 44% of women raped experience it before 18 (this doesn't include statutory rape which isn't the normal definition of rape), only 25.9% of men forced to penetrate experience it before 18. Once men are over 18, the gap in prevalence becomes slim to none, so past year prevalence is still reliable, especially when 18-24 is the most common age group for men and women to be raped respectively.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:04 PM
2

I also explained somewhere else in the comments section Lifetime prevalence is not as reliable as past year prevalence when knowing if women or men are more likely to be raped It could be forced to penetrate rates skyrocketed in the past decades so older generations are less likely to have had it (or admit to it in their lifetime)
/r/MensRights06/03/22 07:25 PM
2

No they are usually raped before 25, typically at age 15-24. 18/19 is not underage And no, statutory rape doesn’t count because in statistics about rape cases and how common rape is, they exclude statutory rape
/r/MensRights06/03/22 04:50 PM
2

No that has nothing to do with it. And this is about normal rape not statutory rape. And no, like I said just as many men are forced to penetrate each year as women are raped which is more reliable than lifetime victimizations because if men are less likely to in their lifetime but just as likely to in the e past year then maybe it’s more common than it used to and older men are less likely to have experienced it when they were a lot younger (young men are forced to penetrate the most) and force…
/r/MensRights06/03/22 01:52 PM
3

That’s because older men maybe are less likely to admit to being raped back when they were much younger (young men are at higher risk) and forced to penetrate rates could be higher than they used to So past year is more reliable.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 12:14 PM
5

Look it up
/r/MensRights04/03/22 11:58 PM
7

they sure answer honestly in other surveys. besides i doubt that women are more likely or less likely to admit it. besides, just as many men are forced to penetrate each year as women are raped and the offender is usually a woman. male victims of rape almost 0% report it, among female rape victims, contrary to what feminists say, it's not nearly 0%.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 03:28 PM
9

It’s odd how I could beat up a small scrawny guy and people will break it up trying to calm me at best or stand there and record at worst, but mildly slap a woman your size and you’ll get viciously beaten by white knights and they’ll act like you raped a 7 year old child.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 11:05 AM
2

I remember on r/IncelTear a woman had molested a 4 year old boy and made child porn of it in Russia and some upvoted comment said “domestic violence is common in Russia” even though there’s no proof she was abused by a domestic abuser and that probably has nothing to do with her motive for molesting a child
/r/MensRights02/03/22 03:44 AM
1

Feminists Infantilize women by portraying them as never responsible for their actions Look at comments sections about Aileen Wuornos
/r/MensRights02/03/22 03:37 AM
7

They think you’re a fake incel if you aren’t short ugly and of color
/r/MensRights02/03/22 03:34 AM
13

if it was a man, every reddit comment would be about how they want to brutally torture him to death or something.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 09:42 PM
0

They asked people if they were victims of a crime in a survey and asked if they ever reported it
/r/MensRights28/02/22 01:35 PM
4

It still wasn’t that different from today it’s not that outdated Like how back then and now, men are more likely to be crime victims
/r/MensRights26/02/22 03:51 PM
4

It’s the only data I could find and the 90s wasn’t all that long ago anyway
/r/MensRights26/02/22 03:30 PM
0

You’d be surprised how many people think promiscuous men are womanizers instead of studs. Only hypermasculine men view them as studs
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:13 AM
1

men who are forced to penetrate are victmized by a woman 79% of the time and men who are victims of sexual coercion have a woman victimize them like over 80% of the time it's on CDC and men are much more likely to experience sexual coercion or being made to penetrate than being raped by a man (anal rape or being forced into giving fellatio rape).
/r/MensRights17/02/22 09:46 PM
1

that's just mere investigation to figure out the culprit or to find evidence to convict him that's not violation wtf
/r/MensRights17/02/22 09:44 PM
2

female prisons tend to be less violent, but that's because violent women and women who commit violent crime are less likely to be reported than male violent criminals, so they're less likely to go to prison. also women are more likely to assault their boyfriend than assault other women while men are more likely to commit same-sex violence than commit violence against their girlfriends or women in general. so female inmates might not assault other female inmates i read some anecdotal evidence tha…
/r/MensRights17/02/22 02:20 AM
1

not an argument, also you don't have to be a feminist to listen to my point. benevolent sexism exists and i already explained why yet you didn't directly address my specific points
/r/MensRights17/02/22 02:04 AM
1

this is a simplistic way of viewing the problem. it can actually be viewed in a polar opposite way. this idea that rape survivors can never move on and can never enjoy their life again is a myth. i'm not denying there are many who never move on or get better, but the idea that all of them never get better is a myth. some do get better later on and some do move on and have the ability to enjoy their life to at least some extent, even if it's a long time later, but saying they consistently and alw…
/r/MensRights17/02/22 02:03 AM
1

giving long sentences doesn't really work much. this is just some new concept from 1974
/r/MensRights17/02/22 01:55 AM
1

benevolent sexism exists dude. it infantilizes women as weaker than men regardless of how polite it is
/r/MensRights16/02/22 10:13 PM
1

i did, and you didn't address my argument with your 2nd previous reply
/r/MensRights16/02/22 09:22 PM
1

everything i said is true. look up female rapists and it shows that 43.6% of rapists are women in a survey of 43,000 people of all those who admitted in 2012 to forcing someone into sex against their will, 43.6% of those people who admitted it are women. and yes, 40-80% of men molested in their childhood were molested by a woman. i can't retrieve the source i read it, but it's true.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 09:21 PM
1

i didn't use this to make it a competition, i brought this up because feminists argue that accusations can't be all that harmful or that they aren't anything important.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 09:17 PM
1

anecdotal evidence isn't valid evidence. also, this post doesn't say that police always do something about rape nor does it say they do something, but they aren't less likely to do something about it than with other crimes. your anecdote doesn't debunk statistics. anecdotes don't necessarily represent what usually happens. this is probably because of, aside from the war on drugs, the fact that rape is your word against someone else (which isn't proof) and because rape is hard to prove, so they c…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 09:14 PM
2

sex offenders usually don't get killed in prison. this is a myth. they can get beat up but not killed. the homicide rate in prison is actually really low. news stories about them being killed don't count as evidence btw because the rare stuff was always gets on the news while the usual stuff is only statistics. also, the reason inmates hate rapists isn't because they care about women. they rape each other and they sexually harass female correctional officers. it's just a guilt by association fal…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 09:06 PM
4

Nope. Women are just as likely to commit DV as men if not more and it’s not usually in self defense contrary to what feminists say. Most DV was mutual and in non reciprocal cases, women are the offenders 70% of the time. And 43.6% of rapists are women Also 40-80% of men molested in their childhood are molested by a woman. And just as many men are forced to penetrate each year by a woman as women are raped
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:13 PM
9

You’re using the cherry-picking fallacy. You can’t cherry pick a few examples because a few examples do not necessarily represent what is usually true because of the minuscule sample size and plus whenever the rare stuff happens it’s news when the usual stuff happens it’s statistics so ofc the media shows examples of rapists getting lenient sentences all the time because it causes outrage and gets attention. Look up hasty generalizations fallacy. Statistically speaking (cited above in a link), r…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:00 PM
10

Dude people downplay the harmful effects of carjacking and they snicker at anyone who suggests it’s traumatic. Most people acknowledge how traumatic rape is Also, most people do teach people to keep their doors locked at night or to be wary or burglars etc. this is the same reason they say what you just described. It’s NOT because they think rape is ok. It’s because many women are raped by someone they know so ofc they wonder if she was actually raped. Because they think rape is usually a strang…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 03:38 AM
0

again, this is much easier said than done. telling people "just fake experience" is more easy said than done. also, saying it's been a while might make them think you are rusty but even those people will still recall what to do. so the fact that you have no idea what to do will already make them wonder whats up. they dump you and it doesn't take overnight to find another partner, especially with how often people endure rejections beforehand. faking experience doesn't always work, if the sex is s…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 03:13 AM
19

honestly people seem to hate rapists more than murderers. look at the comments section of a rapist article compared to murder of a man.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 03:08 AM
31

most male rape victims are raped by a woman, most male sexual coercion victims are sexually coerced by a woman, half of male victims of unwanted sexual contact have a woman as the culprit, some male victims of unwanted sexual-non contact have a female perpetrator, and 40-80% of male victims of child molesters were molested by a woman. little boys are more likely to killed by a parent than little girls and among kids under 8 who get killed by a parent, the mother is more likely the perpetrator (t…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 02:43 AM
1

you didn't even address my arguments.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:17 AM
1

dude, i cite statistics and all you say "it's all in your head" not only without explaining why but everything i say is backed up statistics and you continue to deny it.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:15 AM
1

having to hide things from people, including people you wanna trust, is painful and not something we need to endure Red flag all in my head? Dude. when you get older being a virgin DOES become a red flag. it's true. look it up. even surveys have shown that many people won't date virgins and that many see it as a red flag. they wonder why you haven't started by age 20. and no, paying attention doesn't make a virgin instantly good overnight. you probably won't last long, and even the second or thi…
/r/MensRights15/02/22 08:47 PM
1

benevolent sexism is sexism. it doesn't matter if it cherishes women because it infantilizes them and treats them as weaker or less capable than men. benevolent sexism might privilege women, but it also discriminates, too, even if it's misandrist.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 06:40 PM
0

Many virgins don’t get help when depressed about their lack of dating or sex due to stigma. Also, bisexual people are stigmatized but according to your logic they can just not tell anyone because they often enter straight relationships? The stigma's mere existence is already damaging and they cannot tell anyone they date that they are a virgin due to the fact that it’s a red flag once your hit your 20s because many people will ask their dating/sexual history and that happens often on dates. Faki…
/r/MensRights14/02/22 01:38 AM
1

you won't even explain why
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:13 AM
1

you are delusional if you think adults simply don't associate with you. adulthood bullying happens all the time. workplace bullying is common, 15-25% to as many as 43% of college students get bullied, but many don't tell anyone about it because they are taught to be independent and because many times it's roommates so it's behind closed doors and people are less likely to witness it.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 02:57 PM
1

you didn't even explain why. unreadability? i already clarified what each word meant and i was typing a paragraph on my phone, which makes it hard
/r/MensRights13/02/22 02:54 PM
1

not an argument
/r/MensRights13/02/22 02:54 PM
1

i could say the same about gay people. enough people stigmatize virgins to the point where its risky revealing it to people
/r/MensRights13/02/22 02:54 PM
1

It is sexist towards women because although it privileges women it also treats them as less than men by portraying women as fragile and equivalent to children
/r/MensRights13/02/22 05:06 AM
1

What?
/r/MensRights13/02/22 05:05 AM
0

You didn’t explain why it’s rubbish and plus ppl equals people, r equal are, u equals you. My grammar was typed on my phone not my computer and I needed to type a paragraph so I needed to hurry. Either way my grammar doesn’t have anything to do with my statements. It’s not the topic of discussion and it doesn’t invalidate my statements’ accuracy
/r/MensRights13/02/22 05:05 AM
3

Nope that’s bs. Because many times these people bully and harass or ridicule you and many times you will be excluded or treated like shit for it. You can’t expect somebody to be heavily stigmatized by many people and to be not bothered. That’s easier said than done. It’s hard if not almost impossible to control and it’s best to teach people to stop stigmatizing people for being different. Teaching people heavily stigmatized to not care what others think will make them think you don’t wanna help …
/r/MensRights13/02/22 05:04 AM
1

That’s cuz benevolent sexism cherishes women but in a way that marganilizes them as less than men. It means women are wonderful but weak And that’s cuz benevolent sexism is misandrist
/r/MensRights12/02/22 10:31 PM
1

No it isn’t. You can’t tell necessarily who is promiscuous or not Actually if someone is a virgin or not YIU can tell if they are possibly one if they don’t have friends or were socially isolated all their life
/r/MensRights12/02/22 10:28 PM
-1

Many virgins don’t get help when depressed about their lack of dating or sex due to stigma also bi people are stigmatized but according to ur logic they can just not tell any1 cuz they often enter str8 relationships? The stigmas mere existence is already damaging and they cannot tell amy1 they date they r a virgin due to the fact that it’s red flag cuz many ppl will ask their history and that happens often on dates. Faking experience doesn’t always work btw Also ppl still care after 18. Your ane…
/r/MensRights12/02/22 10:25 PM
1

It’s benevolent sexism. People expect men to be stoic and self reliant but portray women as damsels in distress in need of protection
/r/MensRights12/02/22 09:00 PM
3

Nope. Many people who are promiscuous we don’t know are promiscuous.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 08:59 PM
-1

I could say the same for promiscuity or even bisexuals who enter heterosexual relationships (which most bisexuals do) but is it really ok for people to have to hide their secrets to avoid bullying? Especially when being a virgin is a red flag to who you date once you’re over 20 and many virgins who are sexually romantically frustrated are afraid to get help due to social stigma
/r/MensRights12/02/22 08:58 PM
7

Oh just stop. If a woman is slut shamed we have campaigns telling people to stop ridiculing her but a virgin gets ridiculed for being a virgin and he should just stop caring what others think? How is that fair? Stop teaching people to not care what others think when they are heavily stigmatized. It’s very difficult and almost impossible to control. We all care what others think to at least some degree. Anyone who says they don’t is just a liar or lacks self awareness. If you’re mildly judged onc…
/r/MensRights12/02/22 07:23 PM
14

Anecdotes aren’t evidence And bullying is just as common in college and work as in high school (look it up). Virgin shaming still exists later on. Hell as you get older it’s a red flag
/r/MensRights12/02/22 07:14 PM
12

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/sf7a69/violence\_and\_crimes\_against\_women\_are\_not\_done/
/r/MensRights03/02/22 06:04 PM
2

i heard on r/unpopularopinion people said the porn age should be 21, which is a dumb idea and I think it will ruin the college dating scene, lead to men being arrested for looking at 18-20 year old porn and some might be arrested for porn they owned but never deleted. if we raised it to 21, we'd just see people complaining at 21 is "still in college like 18-20 and barely legal" and then they'll advocate 22, then they'll complain that 22 is "fresh out of college and barely legal" and then advocat…
/r/MensRights03/02/22 05:58 PM
2

yes male victims of rape never report it nor do they even tell anyone. feminists argue that female rape victims don't report but there's still a fair amount who do.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 05:52 PM
1

so? they might briefly condemn it but nothing more. mildly slap a woman? everyone says you should be viciously beaten into a hospital, which is way more brutal. rob someone at gunpoint? people will condemn it briefly without usually expressing a desire to beat up the robber. getting robbed at gunpoint is way worse than being mildly slapped.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 12:06 AM
1

Based on they don’t care about robbery victims. It’s obvious. Do you hear people start campaigns against robbery? No
/r/MensRights29/01/22 11:22 PM
3

No people don’t care about robbery victims. They not approve of it but they don’t really care. No campaigns to stop robbery. People don’t pay attention to it but it happens more than rape
/r/MensRights29/01/22 04:49 PM
4

This is a myth. In Arab countries, men face more domestic violence (and no it’s not in self defense). So this isn’t patriarchal. Correlation is not causation. Those countries might have more problems in general. Also, this idea domestic violence wasn’t frowned upon until the 70s is a myth. Throughout most of history it was condemned. In fact a century ago in America, male domestic abusers were much more hated
/r/MensRights29/01/22 04:48 PM
8

Society certainly doesn’t care about robbery victims. We don’t have campaigns against robbery but we have campaigns against catcalling even though being robbed is worse than catcalling. People think being robbed is nothing that bad but that’s false. So why don’t people start campaigns against robbery? Because most robbery victims are men.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 01:42 PM
11

I’ve literally heard feminists say it’s done to support patriarchy they even said that about rape And domestic violence isn’t the result of patriarchy. It’s a gender symmetrical crime and male domestic abusers are similar to other male criminals and often attack other men too. Straight Women, gay men and lesbians also commit just as much domestic violence. Besides how could it be a result of patriarchy when there’s no patriarchy and society frowns upon hitting a woman
/r/MensRights29/01/22 01:41 PM
2

Honestly many red flags aren’t necessarily red flags. Having no friends isn’t necessarily a red flag. Making friends becomes hard as you get older and there can be many reasons why they might not have friends. Apparently many women consider virginity a red flag too (if you’re in your early-mid 20s or older)
/r/MensRights21/01/22 05:19 PM
4

Same with when democrats didn’t believe Biden’s accusers even though there’s many videos of Biden acting sketchy around women and even prepubescent girls
/r/MensRights15/01/22 03:41 AM
3

What about the other articles I showed which might not have comments?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 02:38 PM
3

Most men don’t. Men are much more likely to NOT do it. Most men don’t sexually harass lesbians. There’s WAY more women who refuse date bisexual men than men who sexually harass lesbians. Also society stigmatized bisexual/gay men more than bisexual/gay women Asians aren’t nongenital body parts or inanimate objects so no you can’t fetishize Asians. Plus, there’s way more Asian women who sexually obsess over white men than vice versa. And there’s way more women who consider Asian men unattractive t…
/r/MensRights29/12/21 05:30 PM
3

They even call guys incels even if they have girlfriends.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 03:39 PM
8

Funny thing is that studies show misogynistic men typically are promiscuous men who sleep around, not virgins. Those incel forums they take screenshots of (and nice guy syndrome guys too) are anomalies emphasized by social media because virgin men are an easy target. I rely on statistics not a bunch of guys you might see on anonymous forums and meme communities. https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC4842162&blobtype=pdf
/r/MensRights28/12/21 03:38 PM
0

Men don’t value virginity anymore. There’s way more men who want experienced women than men who are attracted to inexperienced women. Also, just because a man is a virgin doesn’t mean he has low social status or was never desired by women.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 01:09 AM
1

Dude, most men don’t sexually harass lesbians or try to ask them for threesomes. And I doubt most ask bisexual women they date for threesomes and if they do, I don’t think they necessarily will dump her if she doesn’t say yes to it. Also, I doubt they even know a woman they date is bisexual initially. Women refusing to date bisexual women isn’t the point. It just shows how homophobic women’s dating preferences are and how they stereotype bisexual men as potential gay men and cheating womanizers …
/r/MensRights27/12/21 01:04 AM
1

First, you can’t fetishize bisexuals. They aren’t nongenital body parts or inanimate objects. Second, threesomes are not cheating. Third, just because a guy is attracted to bisexual women because of threesomes doesn’t mean he’s actually necessarily going to want to try a threesome with her or dump her if she doesn’t comply nor does it mean that it’s the sole or even primary reason why he’s dating her. Hell, I doubt men who date bisexuals even initially know she’s a bisexual.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 01:01 AM
0

Yes they’re using it wrong. Just because almost everyone uses the words definition a certain way doesn’t mean their definition is correct. This is the appeal to common belief fallacy. So no, just because 99% of people use the word fetish in a way different from the real definition doesn’t make it correct. And yes google is wrong. Google might be a reliable source in most cases but this is not one of them. The medical definition is correct because it doesn’t rely on appeal to common belief fallac…
/r/MensRights26/12/21 05:25 PM
0

The medical definition is more reliable because common discourse is often based on what society thinks a word means and society is often incorrect about things. The medical definition is reliable because the medical definition defines words based on their formal and therefore actual meaning. Also medical science does cover psych. Also, google is wrong for calling those fetishes. Google isn’t always right (maybe they often are but not in this case)
/r/MensRights25/12/21 11:10 PM
1

That’s a super different context. No it isn’t ok for a woman to be topless in front of children. What’s next? 12 year old girls with boobs growing should be allowed to have topless pics online? And their dads can take pictures of them where she’s topless in the manner that most people take family pics and he can have it on his phone? No dude. If they wanna be topless where only adults are allowed fine but not where children are.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 11:06 PM
1

Humans never mature
/r/MensRights24/12/21 07:30 PM
1

Those classifications are a fallacy called appeal to definition. Those definitions often can be flawed such as this case. While medical definitions restrict the term sexual fetishism to objects or body parts,[1] fetish can, in common discourse, also refer to sexual interest in specific activities.[5] The common discourse definition is false because society misuses definitions of words a lot.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 03:06 PM
2

I mean a woman being topless in front of children isn’t ok Nor is a 12 year old girl with breasts being topless in public (or online) ok
/r/MensRights24/12/21 04:26 AM
1

Those aren’t fetishes. Most people misuse the word
/r/MensRights23/12/21 10:19 PM
1

And how is men’s reason any worse? (Men find both participants attractive unlike finding only one in straight porn)
/r/MensRights23/12/21 04:45 PM
0

Refusing to date a bisexual when it doesn’t affect the relationship and is a mere emotion they feel about their own genders attractiveness is a negative bias against bisexuals and thus is homophobic. You don’t have to hate gay people to be homophobic
/r/MensRights23/12/21 04:43 PM
4

Just because she wanted to establish a relationship first doesn’t make you sexually incompatible. It’s not like her kinks and what she likes are different
/r/MensRights23/12/21 04:40 PM
1

It’s true
/r/MensRights23/12/21 04:38 PM
2

Plus I don’t see what difference it makes if they find the same sex attractive. So it’s a dumb and therefore clearly biased reason to call bisexuality a dealbreaker
/r/MensRights23/12/21 04:37 PM
11

Refusing to date bisexuals especially due to stereotypes is homophobic Refusing to date your own gender is not homophobic
/r/MensRights23/12/21 02:08 PM
59

I read some straight women watch male gay porn
/r/MensRights23/12/21 05:49 AM
30

Many of the women who watch lesbian porn were actually straight, not to mention that lesbians comprise a low percentage of women. There’s fewer gay people than you think Just because they like the idea of a threesome, doesn’t mean that’s the ONLY reason or even main reason why they’re dating them. In fact, it might be only a minor or secondary reason at most. Many times it won’t even be a reason, and it’s not even a quarter as bad as women calling bisexual men a dealbreaker due to homophobic ste…
/r/MensRights23/12/21 02:56 AM
0

The reason inmates hate rapists isn’t because they actually frown upon rape. Hell, some inmates actually sexually harass female correctional officers (even if she never sexually exploited inmates which not all female CO’s do) or threaten to rape them (even if they don’t do it). The reason inmates hate rapists is because it’s a sex crime and all sex crimes, regardless of what type of crime it is, are frowned on in prison. You could be in there for public urination or indecent exposure and inmates…
/r/MensRights22/12/21 07:50 PM
1

those people didn't think that until they joined the forum, and these forums influenced them. they joined these forums because of society's stigma against virgins who cannot find a partner, so they couldn't know where to go.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 04:17 PM
2

not the sole factor and these peope wouldn't join these forums to find belonging if society didn't stigmatize virgins
/r/MensRights09/12/21 12:56 AM
4

Only right wing news might report on this if anything and some MRAs aren’t even right-wing.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 12:51 PM
7

nobody portrays monica that way. also, those are exceptions, not the rule. im not biased. look at aileen wuornos, everyone sympathizes with her yet she killed men she knew wouldn't hurt her and didn't regret it (look up her quotes if you don't believe me). even andrea yates killed her kids and everyone just blames the husband. the media statistically portrays men in a harsh way as monsters i literally showed the data. they don't do that with women. and look at the way they depict female teachers…
/r/MensRights12/11/21 03:56 AM
5

media portrays men as solely perpetrators/antagonists. they portray women as solely victims.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 01:42 AM
6

Media also emphasizes whites women who get killed
/r/MensRights12/11/21 12:59 AM
1

Strangers usually target men. Women are usually attacked by someone they know
/r/MensRights11/11/21 04:48 AM
4

Yep. Sex offenders have a low recidivism rate compared to robbers and burglars, who have the highest recidivism rate. People are now saying there needs to be a domestic abuser registry but nobody advocates burglar or robbed registries or even registries for paroled killers.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 11:53 PM
0

It’s not particularly the reality.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 09:57 PM
9

It’s not 1 in 3. It’s only estimated to be 8%. Also, those surveys don’t estimate the number of women who are raped AND simultaneously reported it so you saying the survey results are much higher because it’s underreported is false (if that’s what you imply). Also hardly ever do victims have severe injuries and many times they don’t have visible injuries (no your anecdotes don’t debunk statistics). Literally we have campaigns against catcalling when crimes like robbery and aggravated assault are…
/r/MensRights09/11/21 09:57 PM
7

I actually remember reading a study debunking the myth that domestic violence is used to subjugate women. Most domestic abusers are not sexist. As for rape, feminists think it’s about power over women. Many rapists might use power as a means but the end is sex. Many rapists commit rape typically for sex. It’s usually about their desire to have as many sex partners as possible. And also even if violence against women was gendered, how does that make it any worse or serious than violence against m…
/r/MensRights09/11/21 08:44 PM
5

A man beats viciously a scrawny small guy: people either try calm the aggressor at best or stand there and record at worst A man just mildly slaps a woman: everyone tries to jump him and people think he belongs in a hospital with severe injuries.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 02:10 PM
5

I remember Brittany Zamora got 20 years for her crime involving a 13 year old male student and people in the comments thought the sentence was too harsh and she only needed 3 years. These same people would command a 21 year old guy even kissing a 17 year old girl to brutally tortured and castrated. Execution for dating a 17 year old is pretty harsh but a 13 year old? That’s different although I oppose executions in general.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 02:08 PM
1

But why should they feel forced to be in the closet? Even if they hide their secret, knowing you have a personal trait heavily stigmatized is enough damage.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 02:34 PM
26

Not to mention short men are more likely to commit suicide.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 04:50 AM
4

Nobody will know you’re gay unless you tell them do homophobia is ok. What ludicrous logic Also golf and sex are two different activities, one is shoved down our throat by society and a basic part of human life the other isn’t
/r/MensRights05/11/21 04:38 AM
2

That’s why r/niceguys is a dumb sub
/r/MensRights05/11/21 02:30 AM
1

Just read it
/r/MensRights04/11/21 02:02 PM
5

According to r/niceguys you have nice guy syndrome. Guys like you are often featured there misinterpreted as nice guy syndrome.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 06:29 AM
1

How do you know?
/r/MensRights04/11/21 06:20 AM
11

Also when many sexually frustrated kissless virgins do try to get help, people either trivialize their issues at best or ridicule them for their virginity at worst. They can’t get help so they resort to hostile, misanthropic incel forums to find a group where they feel welcomed, and these people are easy to recruit. Groups of people with intense or controversial beliefs recruit lonely people, in turn influencing them.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 06:19 AM
2

Idk if nice guys are just being nice to get laid. I already explained why. But hardly any overly nice men have nice guy syndrome. And I already explained that many guys on r/niceguys don’t appear to have nice guy syndrome and some texts there appear fabricated
/r/MensRights04/11/21 06:14 AM
3

You’re just gonna have to read it all if you are able to of course. It wasn’t easy for me to make a TLDR that encompasses all my points.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 05:37 AM
3

Many posts on this sub are long
/r/MensRights04/11/21 05:36 AM
4

You literally just repeated a bunch of things I already debunked I never said women only like macho men nor did I say they don’t like nice people. But macho men sure attract women way more than most men and it is common for them to have a lot of sex partners and dating partners. I also never said women don’t like nice men, but overly nice, excessively attentive men are unattractive to many women because they’re seen as a doormat or Defy the hunter gatherer image so to speak. Their cavewoman inst…
/r/MensRights04/11/21 05:36 AM
7

You don’t even post here
/r/MensRights04/11/21 03:08 AM
1

there are zero blogs here. they use reliable sources and what do you mean by uneven amount? They use reliable studies about rapists. And none of these studies used anecdotal evidence. Also, studies with small sample sizes often can be replicated, showing the same exact finding each time. Not a shitty news article. it's a good article for a NYtimes article.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 02:00 PM
4

Benevolent sexism
/r/MensRights20/10/21 11:31 PM
1

look up about CDC. their numbers are misleading. BJS is much more reliable
/r/MensRights07/10/21 03:32 PM
14

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Denise-Hines/publication/6474011_Predictors_of_Sexual_Coercion_Against_Women_and_Men_A_Multilevel_Multinational_Study_of_University_Students/links/0912f50ab81cd6d51f000000/Predictors-of-Sexual-Coercion-Against-Women-and-Men-A-Multilevel-Multinational-Study-of-University-Students.pdf?origin=publication_detail
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:37 PM
2

Elaborate more on the second paragraph
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:36 PM
1

women experience hair loss less than men, and when they do it's significantly less noticeable.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 03:24 PM
-1

Usually is because it’s saying generally speaking Shaved heads don’t usually help balding unless you are over 35. If you’re young it won’t help you look good unless you have a hypermasculine face
/r/MensRights30/09/21 11:56 AM
0

Anecdotal evidence is not evidence
/r/MensRights30/09/21 03:06 AM
0

shaved heads usually only look good on men over 35
/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:20 PM
0

People don’t have menopause until 10 to 15 years later.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 12:01 PM
36

I’ve read many rapists were molested by a woman in their childhood
/r/MensRights26/09/21 04:32 PM
2

Already debunked in the post
/r/MensRights26/09/21 01:11 PM
8

Wouldn’t surprise me
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:45 AM
2

Not an argument. Anyone who simply responds with “k” is a coward who either is too lazy to come up with a real argument or too afraid or stubborn to admit their opponent has a valid point and see their opponent’s perspective. Do one of the two or you lost the debate.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 04:07 PM
4

I am correct you didn’t prove me wrong
/r/MensRights23/09/21 07:31 PM
5

MRAs aren't religious Christians you moron. Nobody here appears to be religious. also, having a college education=/=smart. school is indoctrination, not the acquisition of knowledge. what you're taught in school isn't what always is true. it's often cherrypicked, biased information with lots of info they won't show you. There are many stupid people with a college education. Are college-educated people more likely to be genuinely smart? MAYBE. but NOT necessarily. and you're the latter.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 01:24 PM
6

https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Ad-Hominem-Circumstantial
/r/MensRights23/09/21 01:20 PM
7

I doubt you did because you can say anything you want, because you acted like the paper never said domestic violence was always frowned upon when the paper shows lots of evidence it was. Also, whether I should find a hobby or not is a red herring fallacy. That’s literally irrelevant And I do have hobbies, it doesn’t several hours to gather sources. I have time management. You’re simple minded
/r/MensRights23/09/21 03:33 AM
8

I literally read that entire research paper you fucking dumbass. I love how you act like you’re psychic when you assume I barely read it. Also marital rape is not the same as domestic violence. And early 1900s is way before the 70s when feminists incorrectly claim is when society paid more attention to DV. The whole research paper shows how hated domestic abusers were 100 years ago and before that even. It’s been frowned upon throughout most of history. And long ago, rapists got lynched in many …
/r/MensRights23/09/21 03:26 AM
6

Not an argument
/r/MensRights23/09/21 02:23 AM
6

Did you forget to read the ENTIRE research paper? How stupid are you?
/r/MensRights23/09/21 02:21 AM
1

i said, look it up yourself. i've read many studies and i promise you'll run into the same ones i viewed
/r/MensRights22/09/21 05:42 PM
1

look it up yourself, but these sources to have a response bias due to low response rate. none of them will say a majority of women are rape victims.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 04:57 PM
1

look at statistics. a minority of women are rape victims, NOT a majority. MOST won't get raped. and YOU think ALL get raped.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 04:54 PM
2

LOL literally surveys i was talking about were of thousands of people. all you did was talk to a bunch of people you know in real life, which is a possible sampling bias because maybe you only hang out with types of people and maybe you don't remember all the tons of people you've met who never got raped because they don't speak about how they never got raped, or maybe the people you hang out with are more likely to be raped than the general population. The percentage of women i ask who will tel…
/r/MensRights21/09/21 10:42 PM
2

who knows what YOUR reason is. it doesn't necessarily reflect other people's reasons.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 10:27 PM
3

LOL if you think most women are rape victims. A survey IS proof, NOT all the people you know in life (a relatively small sample size not to mention potential sampling bias). Look up how many women have been raped, and i promise you it means most never were. And as for assault, men are much more likely to be assaulted and rape surveys have inflated numbers due to poor phrasing of questions and a low response rate (response bias).
/r/MensRights21/09/21 12:06 PM
2

because i've read shit
/r/MensRights21/09/21 12:04 PM
2

no your anecdote contradicts the statistics i provided (rape sentences are typically more punitive than your anecdote). you haven't seen all the cases in the world. you're just generalizing based on what you've seen when it might not necessarily represent what other people saw. i will rely on statistics which include all cases, not anecdotes.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 12:16 AM
3

most women are not raped. besides, the percentage of women who are raped is lower than surveys show due to low response rate (response rate) and bad phrasings of questions.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 12:14 AM
2

Most other crimes have lower clearance rates. Most rapes aren’t reported but that’s partially because many rape victims aren’t raped by a stereotypical rapist (armed strangers in the dark alley) and many victims don’t acknowledge it as rape.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 08:25 PM
2

It isn’t inconclusive. All you used is a mere anecdote when anecdotes vary. You can’t generalize based on one anecdote I used literally statistics about how most of other crimes receive less punitive sentences and how due process, not misogyny or rape culture, causes the criminal justice system to not incarcerate that many rapists (the stranger danger myth also plays a role).
/r/MensRights20/09/21 08:23 PM
2

Anecdotal evidence does not debunk statistics
/r/MensRights20/09/21 08:12 PM
2

Show me
/r/MensRights20/09/21 05:01 PM
7

The media thinks rare cases like Brock turner are common The rare stuff is news, the usual stuff is unknown statistics
/r/MensRights20/09/21 01:57 PM
6

Also the reason why people might not believe a woman who accuses a guy of rape is probably because she accused someone she knows: some typical everyday guy. Most people think that rapists are a stranger in a dark alley when they’re usually someone the victim knows and it usually happens in a house so the stranger danger myth is what causes people to call her a liar rather than rape culture or misogyny. And ironically, feminists promote the stranger danger myth by saying women are endangered in t…
/r/MensRights20/09/21 11:39 AM
27

But this isn't peculiar to rape, this is true for most crimes. besides, it's even worse for male rape victims when it comes to justice.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 02:49 AM
25

that's because rape is hard to prove. and like i said, it's due process, not misogyny that makes rape cases seem biased against women. Besides, many crimes have low clearance rates. In 2017, the clearance rate is 61.6% for murder cases, 53.3% of aggravated assault cases, 34.5% of rape cases, 29.7% of robbery cases, 19.2% of larceny-theft offenses, 13.7% of motor vehicle theft offenses, 13.5% of burglary cases, and 21.7% of arson offenses. This means rape has a higher clearance rate than most cri…
/r/MensRights20/09/21 02:44 AM
1

alpha guys are faithful? Hypermasculine men literally lack monogamy and emotional intimacy and men with more flings are more likely to cheat.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 12:27 AM
1

Women sleep with these guys because they don't know these guys slept around with tons of women. A lot of these guys might lie and say "I've been with 8 people" instead of admitting it was 30
/r/MensRights19/09/21 12:26 AM
5

i think it's what feminists say in order to politicize rape idk.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 02:05 AM
1

animals function differently from humans, so animals motive for rape isn't going to necessarily represent humans motive for rape.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 01:51 AM
2

again, none of those criticisms pertain to ANY the quotes i cited from Lisak. In fact, Lisak's quotes I used were him citing what he found in OTHER PEOPLE's studies. the fact that rapists are promiscuous and believe they need to have sex to be successful is something he found from other people's studies rather than his own.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 01:43 AM
2

Name some. because just because he made a few errors doesn't mean EVERYTHING he says is wrong. this is the guilt by association fallacy. also, this paper i cited by him is where he is writing about rapists based on OTHER PEOPLE's articles. so that paper of his that i quoted is, in fact, reliable
/r/MensRights18/09/21 01:39 AM
0

dude. he only got ONE thing wrong. the idea that 90% of college rapists are serial rapists. thats the ONLY flaw he had in his studies. other than that, his studies are accurate. otherwise he would've faced other criticisms. plus, this paper in particular is based on OTHER PEOPLE's studies he examined. don't question what i cited
/r/MensRights17/09/21 11:10 PM
2

rape culture is about rape myth acceptance, which most people don't believe but a minority here and there believe. that's why rape culture exists even if most people hate rapists
/r/MensRights17/09/21 09:44 PM
8

yes. but something tells me you might (correct me if i'm wrong) be a feminist visitor
/r/MensRights17/09/21 07:56 PM
4

when did i say rape culture doesn't exist?
/r/MensRights17/09/21 07:55 PM
4

benevolent sexism. society thinks men are self-reliant and can protect themselves (which is false) and view women as equivalent to children and believe women need to be protected and taken care of
/r/MensRights17/09/21 05:35 PM
3

Many studies where women like benevolently sexist men probably were conducted in the western world. Benevolent sexism is approved of worldwide, even in the west. Bohner, G., Ahlborn, K., & Steiner, R. (2010). How sexy are sexist men? Women’s perception of male response profiles in the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory. Sex Roles, 62, 568–582. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9665-x. Chisango, Tadios; Mayekiso, Thokozile; Thomae, Manuela (October 2014). "The social nature of benevolent sexism and the antisocial …
/r/MensRights12/09/21 03:05 PM
2

I used that word to clarify and distinguish the friendships from normal friendships
/r/MensRights12/09/21 01:04 PM
4

Dude, you clearly haven’t read studies about women’s dating preferences. And no the study on benevolent sexism is not misleading or badly paraphrased. Prove it or keep quiet. Women literally say they want tall men to feel small weak and feminine and because they want to feel protected. Sounds like subordination to me
/r/MensRights12/09/21 01:04 PM
3

Benevolent sexism toward WOMEN
/r/MensRights12/09/21 01:01 PM
120

kicking someone in the balls isn't even labeled sexual assault. before someone says "but it's done to physically attack them", would you say that if i punched a woman's boobs or vagina just to physically attack? It's still a sexual organ and you engaged in contact with it against their will. it's sexual assault.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 02:14 AM
10

Also women receive no backlash when they call virginity a red flag or dealbreaker but a man who don’t date promiscuous women is accused of slut shaming
/r/MensRights11/09/21 12:44 PM
3

I saw it in YouTube comments all the time
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:18 AM
6

women most affected meme
/r/MensRights01/09/21 10:37 PM
5

That’s the only statistic I got And despite thirty years ago, society wasn’t that different back then
/r/MensRights29/08/21 11:47 PM
6

1987 wasn’t that long ago.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 10:44 PM
1

How do you know these studies are biased? You’re just making assumptions without proof. This is the appeal to trust fallacy and these studies were peer reviewed. Also, feminists insist there’s a double standard favoring promiscuous men so these studies clearly aren’t pro-feminist at all And your anecdotal evidence is NOT evidence because anecdotes vary (look up anecdotal fallacy). Like I said, you probably saw many promiscuous men face stigma you probably don’t remember it because it refutes eve…
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:15 AM
1

Anecdotal evidence is not evidence and I’m sure you have seen promiscuous men get called womanizers or fuckboys. You probably just don’t recall it because it refutes your confirmation bias When we’re taught something over and over again we subconsciously develop a confirmation bias. As a result, when we see situations that debunk what we’ve been taught we won’t recall it. But when we see situations that reinforce what we’ve been taught we remember it. This study showed participants scenarios whe…
/r/MensRights26/08/21 08:23 PM
1

Again, read the article I sent you it literally explains how not only women are hardwired to cheat but hardwired to be promiscuous. You didn’t seem to read it
/r/MensRights26/08/21 11:48 AM
1

The article literally explained how women are also hardwired to be promiscuous read more
/r/MensRights25/08/21 11:30 PM
0

No even for relationships they don’t consider it a turn on. There are even men who don’t wanna date a virgin. And prefering a virgin over a woman who fucked 50 men doesn’t mean they’d date one. That’s like saying prefering an elderly GF over a 5 year old means one is interested in dating elders
/r/MensRights25/08/21 11:29 PM
2

Living 30 years doesn’t make you know everything. Read the studies at the top.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:40 PM
2

Actually studies show even women are hardwired to sow their wild oats. It’s about their vagina determining which man has the best sperm or something. This is a invalid evolutionary theory. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6211153/The-rise-female-infidelity.html Read this it elaborates And no, prudish women are stigmatized too. Virgin women also are stigmatized. Nobody considers them pure anymore in this hypersexual modern era. It’s not the 1920s anymore
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:39 PM
1

You do have a confirmation bias. It’s subconscious. When we’re taught something over and over, we develop a confirmation bias subconsciously. As a result if we see information that refutes what we’ve been taught we don’t recall it. If we see scenarios which confirm what we’ve been taught we recall it. That study showed that participants were shown scenarios where promiscuous women were stigmatized and scenarios where promiscuous men were stigmatized. They only later recalled scenarios where prom…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:35 PM
1

Promiscuous men aren’t often called studs. They’re called womanizers or fuckboys
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:33 PM
0

No actually. Men don’t consider virginity a turn on. It’s a myth. They’re actually more likely to consider it a turn off than a turn on. I’ve read data
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:33 PM
3

The topic of discussion is whether there’s a double standard or not, not whether promiscuity is right or wrong or any of our business. You just used a red herring fallacy
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:49 PM
3

Not to mention too much promiscuity is dangerous and increases the risk of STDs And condoms don’t always work
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:49 PM
2

I literally showed lots of evidence that the double standard is mostly a myth
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:47 PM
3

I’m sure you’ve seen promiscuous men get stigmatized too. You probably don’t remember it because it refutes your confirmation bias. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-006-8866-9 And plus what age group were these people you speak of? 30? Or college students? Also anecdotal evidence does not debunk empirical evidence
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:46 PM
3

And that societal attitudes needs to end
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:43 PM
2

What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:43 PM
3

No. Virgin women aren’t seen as high value anymore. That’s an outdated opinion of virgin women from long ago. We live in a hypersexual society nowadays. Society puts pressure on everyone to have sex including even women. Virgin women are labeled as prudes these days.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:42 PM
1

True but you can’t decide a persons worth based on whether they get laid easily or not
/r/MensRights25/08/21 02:51 AM
3

Anecdotal evidence isn’t evidence and your anecdote contradicts what empirical evidence has shown. Your anecdote doesn’t necessarily represent other promiscuous men’s experiences telling women their body count. Also you’re able to say whatever you want. Your anecdote could be a lie I literally provided evidence up above that promiscuity is a bigger dealbreaker to women than to men. Many women won’t date promiscuous men.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:06 AM
11

i've seen women say they won't date a virgin, they won't date a guy with a super high body count and even a few who said they won't date a guy with a low body count. no backlash a man says he won't date a woman who slept with 30 people? instant backlash and accused of slut shaming.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 11:50 PM
7

there's a reason promiscuous women are labeled easy, because they easily can get laid because they get approached all the time by men and have all these options to choose from.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 11:48 PM
3

women won't date promiscuous men either
/r/MensRights24/08/21 11:47 PM
1

Unless we ban IncelTear Subs like that are bad for reddit
/r/MensRights21/08/21 11:25 PM
2

Mocking them and insulting them doesn’t even help it just inclines them to create bait threads if anything Besides you guys don’t do it because you care about women. You do it for an ego boost and you pick those incels because they’re an easy target
/r/MensRights21/08/21 01:39 AM
1

You’re emphasizing a minority of threads. Plus it’s teenagers which is taboo but it’s not equivalent to prepubescent children at all
/r/MensRights20/08/21 02:43 PM
2

Only like 10% of blackpilled incel forum threads have anything to do with teenagers
/r/MensRights20/08/21 01:02 PM
2

I’m serious. Mock and ridicule is harassment and those subs just cause a lot of harm
/r/MensRights19/08/21 12:48 PM
1

Yes any subreddit that mocks certain groups of people (even bad groups of people) should be banned
/r/MensRights18/08/21 08:30 PM
4

Body count surveys have varying results to be honest.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:49 PM
1

No I have a constructive answer. How do you know that virgins have bad hygiene and never take care of themselves? Any proof or are you just assuming things?
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:45 PM
2

True but stigmatizing virgins makes it worse
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:44 PM
4

You’re using a logical fallacy called appeal to extremes. Not only that, but like I said, taking screenshots of threads and harassing them doesn’t stop the problem. IncelTear don’t care about stopping massacres or protecting women. They just need to mock someone for an ego boost and they pick incels because they’re an easy target. And plus those incels say shit far worse than wanting to date a 16 year old (which is a crime called statutory rape which is much less worse than forcible Rape and the…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:44 PM
9

Adult virgins deserve to be stigmatized because getting laid is easy? If it was easy then ghosting and rejection wouldn’t happen Not to mention some people might have no opportunities to meet people due to location or mental illness. You’re an idiot and you cannot ridicule someone for something they struggle with
/r/MensRights18/08/21 03:22 PM
9

I love how you think that virgin men typically have bad hygiene or never shower or eat right. Such patronizing advice
/r/MensRights18/08/21 03:06 PM
11

IncelTear ridiculing and mocking them doesn’t help the problem. In fact, I don’t think IncelTear care about protecting women or stopping gun violence. The reason they ridicule incels all the time is because they need someone to laugh at for an ego boost and they pick incels cause they’re an easy target. It’s no coincidence so many IncelTear users use other subs that mock certain groups of people. Those incel forums wouldn’t attract any members if society didn’t stigmatize virgins and gaslight th…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 02:53 PM
9

Subreddits like r/IncelTear often just post threads of incel forums and harass them when all this does is give more attention to those forums and in turn increase the number of people using those forums. Not to mention that some people on those purposefully type extremely controversial threads just to bait that sub. I’ve also noticed that people in that sub often trivialize the incels’ problems. I’ve seen IncelTear members trivialize their issues, telling them “sex isn’t important” and mocked th…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 02:50 PM
9

Exactly. If you don’t put women on a pedestal and defend them no matter what and acknowledge women aren’t innocent angels, people automatically assume you’re a virgin and use virgin as an insult. And these are the same people who condemn slut shaming and defend promiscuity. How ironic!
/r/MensRights18/08/21 02:40 PM
2

It doesn’t matter. That doesn’t mean all misandrists are feminists Studies show that hyperfeminine women typically rape men AND they have also sexist attitudes towards women AND endorse rape myths and traditional gender roles they are NOT feminists regardless of how many misandrists are typically feminists Look up sweeping generalizations fallacy
/r/MensRights18/08/21 02:55 AM
16

That’s bullshit. Being in the closet didn’t help gay people feel any better because the fact they know they are hated and cannot be themselves is enough to make anyone crazy. These virgins who are sexually frustrated cannot get help and talk to people about their problems without being gaslighted at best and ridiculed at worst so they have to resort to these forums as a last resort
/r/MensRights18/08/21 02:54 AM
0

No that’s not true. How do you know that? Do you have statistics proving this or is this just some assumption? That’s not necessarily true. It’s just the feminist ones make all the noise because they’re activists. Even if it was true that’s the sweeping generalizations fallacy Hyper feminine women (who tend to commit sexual assault) tend to be sexist towards women and often believe in strict traditional gender roles. They aren’t feminists at all. Not in the slightest.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 02:31 AM
12

So homophobia is no big deal as long as gays stay in the closet? If virginity is stigmatized they have nobody to talk to so they have to resort to those forums.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 02:26 AM
2

That doesn’t mean they’re feminists. There can be all kinds of reasons why they have hostility towards men. You’re using the begging the question fallacy. These women are hyper feminine and I’ve read they also tend to be sexist towards women. They’re NOT feminists
/r/MensRights18/08/21 02:25 AM
4

No they aren’t feminists not to my knowledge
/r/MensRights18/08/21 01:49 AM
3

Anecdotal evidence is NOT evidence but experiences can vary from person to person and other people may have seen things that were the opposite of what you observed. Look up anecdotal fallacy. Additionally many virgin men might suffer shyness, love shyness, social anxiety etc and won’t talk to women. Statistically that is common. And those simps you spoke of most likely lost their virginity as a teen NOT some late bloomer
/r/MensRights17/08/21 06:35 PM
3

How do you know virgin men are simpy? Any evidence or this is just some assumption of yours? The percentage of men who are simps is much bigger than the percent of men who are virgins. Simps probably are just average when it comes how sexually active they are.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 04:19 PM
7

No that's not true. Incel means involuntary celibacy. It has nothing to do with misogyny. When the word was coined, it was coined by a woman and it simply meant someone who is unable to find a romantic or sexual partner despite wanting to. Many forums that self-identified as incels weren't even extremist (e.g.: IncelSupport). The word was just later hijacked by extremists thanks to 4chan. Most misogynistic men are NOT involuntarily celibate. They typically are promiscuous and sexually active/suc…
/r/MensRights17/08/21 04:16 PM
5

it's because of this myth that virgin men are more sexist keeps spreading so I can just show proof it's a myth
/r/MensRights17/08/21 01:42 PM
2

u/Educational-Tough-21
/r/MensRights17/08/21 12:57 PM
3

Misogyny in these studies was defined as hostility towards women
/r/MensRights17/08/21 12:46 PM
7

Exactly. I mean I’m not saying that I have nice guy syndrome but when people wonder why nice guy syndrome guys say women go after jerks this is why this is what gives that impression. Yet Reddit just assumes the virgin guy is the one who will be sexist or attack woman when it’s usually those macho chick magnet type of guys doing it
/r/MensRights17/08/21 12:41 PM
3

The fact that many double standards favor women
/r/MensRights16/08/21 11:05 PM
2

Of course it’s proven to exist
/r/MensRights16/08/21 11:04 PM
5

If the genders were reversed he’d be given years
/r/MensRights15/08/21 11:43 PM
1

Even virgin women are stigmatized now. They aren’t viewed as angels anymore. It’s not like we’re in the 1930s
/r/MensRights15/08/21 11:42 PM
1

Using mere analogies doesn't help. You still are just bringing up something offtopic when you say "what about this?" because you aren't directly addressing their point. If I say Hitler is bad cuz he killed millions and then some Nazi sympathizer said "what about Stalin?", they aren't directly addressing why I called Hitler evil and why they specifically disagree with Hitler being evil despite killing millions. Merely bringing up Stalin doesn't bring up why exactly they still don't consider Hitle…
/r/MensRights12/08/21 11:53 PM
1

all of it marginalizes women and treats them as subordinate by treating them as equivalent to children. The fact that we tell women they need to be protected and taken care of while men don't need that is marginalizing women by teaching them they are equivalent to children. The fact that we infantilize them and tell them that they cannot date someone older when over 18 and cannot have their own responsibilities and decisions is treating them as subordinate. Yes it is harmful to infantilize them …
/r/MensRights12/08/21 11:14 PM
1

Yes there is such thing because benevolent sexism still marginalizes women
/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:07 PM
2

Whataboutism IS a fallacy. People don’t use that word because they hate being called out for being hypocrites. It’s because it doesn’t directly address their argument and is beside the point. It’s people like YOU who distract attention away from the point they make which is why it’s a fallacy. It’s like when Trump supporters say “but Obama put undocumented immigrants in cages” which is a logical fallacy because the topic of discussion is that Trump put them in cages and it was barbaric and Obama…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:07 PM
1

Yes there is
/r/MensRights06/08/21 06:53 PM
1

Benevolent sexism is not giving privileges. It portrays women as subordinate to men by portraying them as equivalent to children. It teaches them they cannot be allowed autonomy as a result. It’s belief is that women are wonderful but weak. The president is an exceptional person because he is the leader of an entire nation and thus warrants special protection due to him controlling what happens in the Nation and due to the fact that his assassination would cause problems throughout the country. …
/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:45 PM
1

Both cannot be the reason? Society is hostilely sexist towards men because we are taught that only men are bad, which is a notion that comes from the benevolent sexism and gender roles I just described. Remember the difference between hostile and benevolent sexism.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:40 PM
2

Saying “but it’s usually other men attacking them” is red herring It’s like when anti-BLM people say “but what about black on black crime?”
/r/MensRights29/07/21 02:11 AM
30

BuT iT’s UsUaLLy oThEr mEn aTtAcKiNg tHeM
/r/MensRights28/07/21 12:12 PM
1

It’s not cringey everyone says female once in a while
/r/MensRights27/07/21 12:34 PM
1

No there’s many songs written by women and few are lesbian
/r/MensRights04/07/21 01:00 PM
1

Many do
/r/MensRights01/07/21 02:10 PM
2

How do you know that data is biased? You’re using the appeal to trust fallacy. This is a peer reviewed source. “I don’t think this is an accurate representation of most men. Most men do care, and do not want to commit to a promiscuous woman” How do you know? Do you have any proof or are you just saying so because society said so? Why would men say they will date promiscuous women out of fear being labeled slut shamers? The men in this survey didn’t wanna date promiscuous women (except for short …
/r/MensRights27/06/21 01:37 AM
3

We care because they affect men.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 11:30 AM
1

They didn’t care you’re a virgin? Well you didn’t date every woman in the e world because surveys show many women won’t date virgins. Look up has virginity lost it’s virtue and Match surveys and askwomen threads. Also maybe you were 18 at the time when women are still willing to date virgins unlike when you’re over 20. Also, many women do make fun of a guy who lasts to quick or feel insulted if he lasts too long. You didn’t date every women in the world I’m talking what I’ve observed among many …
/r/MensRights21/06/21 02:23 PM
2

Wanting someone attractive doesn’t mean you have to only go for the top best. Also people don’t expect men to have MANY partners. Sure they might expect him to have 8 or 10 partners but if he had 20, he’s gonna be called a womanizer. This idea that men who fuck 20 women are called studs is a myth. Maybe macho guys might praise him but most people will call him a womanizer And people don’t expect women to have low number of partners (Eg 1 or 2). As long as it’s less than 10 they won’t care. 5 or …
/r/MensRights21/06/21 02:21 PM
2

I’m not generalizing I’m just stating what is common. I didn’t say ALL women I said MANY women
/r/MensRights21/06/21 02:18 PM
4

Yes but I’ve seen many statistics and observed enough women to confirm many women act the way I described. Just because you never saw it doesn’t mean it never happens Also what a woman or man says might differ from what they do. Statistics and research shows a completely different picture sometimes. It’s like thinking most American women are black because you live in a black area
/r/MensRights20/06/21 10:22 PM
5

Talking to women doesn’t mean anything because what women or men do is different from what they say and just because a woman I meet acts nice doesn’t mean she won’t be cruel to others or cruel in certain contexts. Statistics is fair enough. Research is fair enough And I’ve observed enough in women to confirm the points I made in my original post in this thread
/r/MensRights20/06/21 10:20 PM
9

Many women might have extremely high standards and call something a dealbreaker because it isn’t perfect. And some women might mention a guys penis size in conversations with other women Actually, many virgins even in surveys say they are stigmatized for being a virgin. Look up has virginity lost it’s virtue. And yes, many women DO think it’s a red flag and they think it’s seriously weird if a guy is still a virgin. Many threads on forums, and many videos showed women virgin shaming men or virgi…
/r/MensRights20/06/21 05:35 PM
6

You didn’t talk to every girl in the world. Plus, actions speak louder than words anyways
/r/MensRights20/06/21 04:43 PM
25

Many people in surveys will say size matters. It’s not just porn. Even before porn became easy to obtain men still felt insecure about size Actually women virgin shame just as often. Many women think it’s a red flag if you’re a virgin after 21 and they wonder how it’s possible for you to make past that age as a virgin. Go on r/askwomen and many people said mid 20s it’s a red flag. Plus, many virgins have said they’ve been ridiculed by both men and women Porn actor skills is a metaphor. So obviou…
/r/MensRights20/06/21 04:43 PM
1

actually studies show that women have more partners than they used to. also, other studies show women cheat more than they did 30 years back because nowadays, men are less likely to be taken or sexually active than women, it could be that men are more promiscuous than they used to be perhaps (if they are regularly sexually active)
/r/MensRights15/06/21 05:57 PM
2

whats a stang?
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:30 PM
1

long-term relationship means being a significant other by being together for as long as they want. short-term means a few dates then sex and that's it or one night stands or flings
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:28 PM
1

no she'll dump you because she'll think you're a womanizer who disrespects or objectifies women, doesn't like commitment and cheats. in fact, studies show that men with more short-term flings are more likely to cheat. if she was psychic and could read your mind without you being "naive" enough to tell her, she'd still dump you for sleeping with 20 women before her.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:27 PM
1

men who sleep around with lots of women often can be seen as womanizers who objectify women. not everyone will think he's a stud. many women won't date a guy who slept with 30 women. men with daughters won't like him (men with sons won't either because they'll call him a bad influence). people might think you're a stud if you slept with 10-13 women but if you've slept with 20 women or something, people will call you a womanizer and the only people who will call you a stud are those macho jock ki…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:25 PM
1

just because a guy's a chick magnet doesn't mean he's promiscuous. he could be in a long-term relationship without cheating. all promiscuous men are chick magnets but not all chick magnets are promiscuous. and where is your source that 40% of men reproduce with 80% of women? the study literally said that men don't value low body counts and they CERTAINLY don't consider it a dealbreaker if her body count isn't low.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:23 PM
8

Exactly. I think there’s an article from 1910 saying “domestic violence used to be tolerated but not anymore”
/r/MensRights14/06/21 06:07 PM
0

Again, if a chick magnet told his GF he had 30 partners she'd usually dump him because she'd think he's a womanizer who doesn't like commitment or who cheats. If a chick magnet had 10 partners because he's in a relationships (without cheating) or because he's selective she'll like him.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 02:11 PM
1

They probably do, but they also don't like men with high body counts (unless it's a little high like 10 partners for example). The women in this study valued low body counts but that's because their average age was 20 (the male participants had an average age of 22). That subreddit is full of idiots if so. Low body counts doesn't mean you're bad at sex and being extremely experienced or promiscuous doesn't mean you're good at it. A guy who has been married to his wife and simultaneously first pa…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 02:10 PM
0

no. it's just a study conducted for curiosity not to control men's sexuality. that's an appeal to motive fallacy. it's because feminists think men value low body counts and only men won't date promiscuous women which is false.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:19 PM
1

not necessarily. it depends on the circumstances. but your recommended strategy is even more futile. I guarantee you if you told a woman you're dating you slept with 20 women before her, she's probably going to dump you. Men who slept with that many women are often seen as a womanizer who doesn't like commitment and who cheats.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:19 PM
0

those traits can also be present in men who aren't promiscuous. these women don't expect those men to have 20+ partners. they'll probably assume 8 partners or something.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:15 PM
3

If a guy sleeps with 30 women, the only people who will call him a stud are those macho jock kind of guys. Everyone else (including women) will think he’s a fuckboy womanizer
/r/MensRights14/06/21 12:48 PM
0

You can be a chick magnet without being promiscuous. All promiscuous men are chick magnets but not all chick magnets are promiscuous. Some chick magnets can be in a long term relationship or be selective. If a guy sleeps with 30 women, women will think he’s a womanizer who doesn’t like commitment or who even cheats
/r/MensRights14/06/21 12:45 PM
1

Asking what they do won’t work because people can’t always know their partner’s body count. People can easily lie about their body count to their partner. I believe the participants’ honesty
/r/MensRights14/06/21 12:44 PM
3

The women’s willingness to date a guy plummets even quicker than men’s regardless of men being more willing to engage in a relationship. When it comes to long-term relationships, a man only seems to get somewhat less likely to date the woman if she's had 9 to 11 partners and much less likely if it's 12+. Women become somewhat less likely to date the man if he had 7 or 8 partners and even less likely if he's had 9+ and more if he's had 12+. When it comes to short-term relationships, women's willi…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 12:43 PM
0

Women DO care. They do call promiscuity a dealbreaker. Just because players exist doesn’t mean women are ok with promiscuous men dating them. Studies show that rapists have far more consensual partners than most men but that doesn’t mean women are willing to date rapists. Players don’t necessarily reveal their real body count to women they date.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 12:38 PM
-1

No they don’t. They don’t value low body counts and the reason they’re willing to date women with 7 or 8 partners is because they don’t care about it not because they have no choice. The average age of men in this study is 22. Many women by that age haven’t had 7/8 partners and women with that many partners at 22 might have a little more by 30. They won’t limit their opportunities too much by rejecting a woman at 22 with that many partners. And the men in this sample were willing to date promisc…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 12:36 PM
1

look it up. also, idk what country you lived in but it doesn't necessarily represent other countries and it could be it happens in your country but is exceptionally underreported.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 02:41 AM
9

if i told a man who is slightly overweight to lose weight people would agree but if i told an extremely obese woman to lose weight i'd be called "misogynistic".
/r/MensRights14/06/21 02:41 AM
6

That argument feminists use is a logical fallacy called red herring.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:20 AM
12

A man’s physical attractiveness is determined solely by genetics, even muscles and clothes won’t help his penis size, facial structure, voice, and height. A woman can just put on makeup and more people will be attracted to her.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:05 AM
2

Women are just as likely if not more likely to commit domestic violence/intimate partner violence. They also are only slightly less likely to commit rape.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 03:19 PM
23

When men do express emotions, even feminists lack empathy towards them and call them whiny. How ironic
/r/MensRights12/06/21 09:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter