TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

J-Unleashed Archive

View 20 posts and 756 comments by J-Unleashed on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
215

J-Unleashed/r/PussyPass27/12/14 08:49 AM
59

J-Unleashed/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/20 09:35 PM
59

Activism/SupportJ-Unleashed/r/MensRights31/08/19 12:21 AM
40

J-Unleashed/r/PussyPass14/10/16 05:15 PM
24

J-Unleashed/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/20 04:51 AM
16

J-Unleashed/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/19 06:20 AM
16

DiscussionJ-Unleashed/r/MensRights11/12/14 07:32 PM
16

J-Unleashed/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/20 10:34 PM
15

J-Unleashed/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/20 08:06 PM
15

J-Unleashed/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/19 06:44 PM
9

J-Unleashed/r/MensRights24/12/15 07:16 PM
7

J-Unleashed/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 09:18 PM
6

J-Unleashed/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/20 02:19 PM
2

DiscussionJ-Unleashed/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 08:33 AM
2

J-Unleashed/r/MensRights12/03/16 01:35 AM
1

Question for BluePillJ-Unleashed/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 04:36 AM
1

J-Unleashed/r/seduction26/01/15 09:15 AM
1

J-Unleashed/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:34 AM
1

QuestionsJ-Unleashed/r/MensRights30/11/16 04:39 PM
1

StoryJ-Unleashed/r/MensRights26/01/15 06:08 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Bruh, I conceded and admitted you were right. I disagree with you, you contest. I agree with you, and you still pick a fight. With respects, what the fuck is wrong with you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/20 09:02 PM
1

Not really. I understand when someone begins arguing semantics, they just want to be right. So, /u/BarredSubject... I'm admitting you are right. A person's employer is totally reflective of their individual political views, and any dispute can be wiggled away with arguing semantics. We should all strive to be as politically enlightened as you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/20 07:22 PM
1

Yeah, yeah, you just want to be right. Since this is so important to you, I'll just leave you to your delusion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/20 07:12 PM
2

Point stands. You're trying to play the guilt by association card, and it's failing you pretty badly. As evidence by your doubling-down. How about judging individuals as individuals and not by the groups with which they associate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/20 04:38 PM
2

but it's hard for me to understand why someone who has left-wing positions in general would be comfortable working with PragerU or AEI. You've made this painfully clear in this thread. I'll clarify for you: you can't distinguish between right-wing and not right-wing. Perhaps start with that. By your logic, Donna Brazile is right-wing as well because she works for Fox News.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/20 03:00 PM
1

I'm still trying to figure out how your account's age is even at all relevant to the discussion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/20 11:21 PM
1

I don't participate there. I just lurk. However they have posted a few things there actually look at men's issues, because broken clocks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/20 05:36 PM
1

Funny how these regulations and parameters become awfully flimsy when you actually apply pressure to them with simple figures. It reminds me of when I was a kid, and the rules for any given game would change if a specific kid farted. It shows their rules are myopic, at best.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 06:29 PM
1

Crazy, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/20 03:58 PM
3

Reddit's new policies state that a 'majority group' is not protected under their hate speech rules. So, if this is the case, do we follow this logic about political views? Because I'm fairly certain that the right isn't the majority group on Reddit.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 05:14 AM
2

On the spectrum, I'm not sure where I fall. Either right of center or left of center, but somewhere around moderate. I don't like the Republican party, and I despise the Democrat party. I'm not a fan of the NRA or PP, I'm not big on the libertarian principles of people throwing out community altogether. I'm not a fan of creationism being taught in public schools. I'm all over the place with my views. I take a liberal approach to my stances: in that I'm live and let live.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/20 02:56 AM
2

Everything seems like male supremacy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/20 10:49 PM
1

Right. Everything is racist to you people. The emancipation monument? Racist. Ghandi? Racist. Move along. I do not debate religious nutjobs, especially of the secular variety who can't distinguish between racism and non-racism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/20 10:48 PM
7

Wait, it was deleted from the menslib sub? Interesting. I saw this posted there, upvoted it, and thought to myself, "It's nice when the subreddit posts things like this."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/20 07:45 PM
1

I'm an egalitarian. I'm a risk to the sub because I don't toe the line to leftist orthodoxy. Actually, I think that could be said for a lot of users here. Since the admins are deciding to enforce their new standards retroactively, things that they arbitrarily couldn't push as a violation, could now be subject to new arbitrary standards.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/20 05:58 PM
1

I never understood that question about why I'm on the sub. I'll answer yours, but I'm curious as to where the question is coming from. I'm on the sub for the same reason I follow right-wing subs, or subs that others deem controversial, because I'm free to read and go where ever I want. I don't need some pinhead in Silicon Valley to preach to me about morality or to tell me what I should and should not be reading.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/20 04:39 PM
2

No, you are!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/20 02:27 AM
1

Yeah, I'm surprised that this sub is still around. I'm deleting my account this week. I'm gathering some of the good saved posts I marked, then leaving. Guys like me are a risk to subreddits like this, so this is a blessing-in-disguise for the sub. I wish you all nothing but the best.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/20 12:20 AM
14

Umm... did you just assume their gender? CANCELED!!!!!
/r/MensRights29/06/20 01:35 AM
4

Join us in free agency!! In free agency, you don't need to be on the left side, or the right side, or even my side of the political spectrum. You can be on YOUR side! And you can do so right now for the low price of free-99
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/20 06:42 PM
6

When the left stopped being liberal and started going against liberal principles, I bounced. The goal to end racism is a noble conquest, but unfortunately, that's not the way the world works, and it never will. People are entitled to love what they love, but they're also entitled to hate what they hate. Your best bet is to take the liberal approach by changing their hearts and minds. With marriage equality, it was just that. People are entitled to love who they love and what gives the government…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/20 06:26 PM
0

You get what you put in. If you come off as a jackass, you will be met with the same treatment. It's that simple.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/20 04:59 PM
5

Hell, we could even say there's financial incentive behind it since fathers tend to make more money than men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/20 08:36 PM
-3

I did. Did you read the eulogy? I mean surely if you want to establish PUA as an effective occupation, it would help to learn from the mistakes of those who lived the experience. Do you always act like a jackass, or is this just a pavlov reaction. Oh wait, I get it. You're arrogant. "All those other PUAs did it wrong, but I'm going to do it right. I don't need to assess their mistakes." Don't be a jackass. Read the eulogy and comment your thoughts, otherwise you're just another PUA trying to enc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/20 06:58 PM
-2

If you want to be a PUA, I want to direct you to Roosh. Read the eulogy he delivered at his sister's funeral, then ask yourself if that is really worth it. It seems PUAs will prioritize their social life and miss out on what's most important. Fuck that. If you want to be a PUA, go for it, but I think it will come at an unthinkable cost in the long run.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/20 05:51 PM
1

That would be an interesting documentary to examine the relationship dynamics and less focus on the rights. However the reason for the focus on rights is because those are solid examples which prove the disadvantage status of men. This is why the Golden question to feminists is: what rights do men have that women don't? Rights are a very clear way to assess the social standings of groups, because they're written in ink, they're practiced by society, voted on by the voterbase, and enforced by our…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/20 06:40 PM
27

Check out her Raw Files on her channel. There was so much that didn't make it into the film. Such an interesting film. The circumcision scene was... ummm, for lack of a better term: FUCK NO.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/20 09:11 PM
3

Well, I think OP covered the top comment criteria pretty well. Lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/20 03:53 PM
9

This is why I don't think these people are seeking justice, they're seeking to control by bullying. I remember an old newspaper clipping from the early 1900s, where a woman committed some heinous crime, and the husband had to go to jail for her. I would need to find the clipping.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/20 03:27 AM
18

She testified that some of Vanderhagen's posts and videos — including those that included posts from her personal social media accounts and ones that included her family — scared her. She testified that she found one post particularly threatening. It included a photo of Vanderhagen holding a shovel with Rancilio's initials on the handle and talked about him digging up "all the skeleton's in this court's closet." Rancilio told the jury that she thought Vanderhagen was going "to kill me and bury m…
/r/MensRights11/06/20 06:30 PM
21

So, let me get this straight: A financially well-off female judge was allowed to issue a no-contact order against a regular man that she made a sexist ruling against, he criticizes her, she retreats, he continues to criticize her; THEN she gets to hide behind a legal technicality just because she issued an order for him to fuck off? Thank you for cementing my viewpoint that just because something is illegal, doesn't mean it's unethical.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 06:22 PM
30

Well, he wasn't even allowed to criticize a judge.... so, I'd say it belongs here.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 06:12 PM
6

I honestly didn't see it that way, but yes, you definitely could make a strong argument for that being the implication.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/20 05:54 PM
13

I saw an interesting article on how marriage rates are dropping because women cant find men who earn as much as they do. I always find it bizarre how the media frames this as a women's issue. It isn't that fewer men are going to college, fewer men are ambitious, fewer men are willing to enter marriage; it's that women are having trouble finding quality men because those men don't make as much money.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/20 05:42 PM
1

I teared up a bit when they asked him about his 3 wishes, and he just has one. I wouldn't doubt that this man cries himself to sleep some nights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/20 05:03 PM
2

I'm posting this because it is a moving video that shows a man who reached his breaking point long ago. These men reach their breaking point, and they just don't value themselves anymore. A lot of times, we see men who commit suicide when they can no longer see there kids, but we sometimes forget suicide can manifest on more than just a man's life force.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/20 02:23 PM
1

What percentage of men are killed in officer-involved shootings? I'd wager the vast majority
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/20 07:36 PM
1

Gotcha.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/20 05:12 AM
3

Wealth gap? As in the rich get richer and the poor get poorer?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/20 04:53 AM
1

Unregulated capitalism? Do you mean anarcho-capitalism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/20 04:32 AM
2

I mean with the feminism ideology attached, I figured it went without saying.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 01:07 AM
5

Lol. Blackpillfeminism? That's cute.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 11:12 PM
3

You just need to play with yourself.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 10:20 PM
4

And some people always seem to find little dicks on everyone they don't like. How convenient.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 10:17 PM
12

Super weird that you're sitting around thinking about what my dick looks like, bro.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 09:37 PM
21

It's a joke, not a dick. No need to take it so hard
/r/MensRights07/06/20 08:16 PM
22

I bet you're just fun to be around at parties.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 07:28 PM
34

My stepmom died some years back and I was very close to her. My ex gf told me after 1 month that I need to get over it already.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 06:48 PM
46

Your willingness to show subservience to the feminist cause is valiant but shallow. I need you to prove once and for all that you are sorry for being a male. You can do so by chopping off your penis.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 06:47 PM
2

English
/r/MensRights07/06/20 03:59 PM
3

Yo, downvote this post. If OP won't take it down, it needs to be sunk.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 08:34 AM
2

Dude, just man up, admit you fucked up, apologize, and be mindful of what you're going to post.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 08:32 AM
1

There is more of them than SJWs. Look, if you want to take back the left, the best bet is to embrace "live and let live" liberalism. The left was completely reasonable in their approach to gay marriage. "The government doesn't have the right to tell two consenting adults that they can't get married, whether they are gay or straight." This is the type of liberalism I stick to, even though I'm 100% against marriage. I think marriage is a scam, but consenting adults are free to enter thse contracts…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/20 06:21 PM
1

They could, however, as stated earlier he is smeared as a rape apologist by the left. They read a quote (from The Myth of Male Power) completely without context, and they smear him as a rape apologist. So anyone on the left who wants to bring him up, or any sort of skepticism to their claim is met with shaming. They will even go as far as to pull up the quote from online, but will not seek out the quote in question in the book. The left has done a top-tier job of preying on people's insecurities…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/20 05:49 PM
2

and the SJW left pulls fire alarms on him and calls him a rapist apologist, Absolutely. This goes without saying, and can be publicly observed. Nobody can dispute this. What can be disputed is how the right, or at least, those in power on the political right, do squat to help him gain publicity. My guess is because he isn't traditional enough for them. the non-SJW left in the same places prefers to remain silent Ironically, again personal anecdote, I've encountered more on the left who don't kno…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/20 04:18 PM
6

They definitely make it a point to church up those inappropriate sexual relationships.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 04:08 AM
22

The left has a quality public figure: Dr. Warren Farrell. I don't agree with him on everything, but hes a great guy, he cares about men's issues, and he's on the left side of the political spectrum. He's also not well-received by a lot of right-wingers because they think he's too much of a bleeding heart (I disagree) This is a personal anecdote, so take it with a grain of salt. My friend was looking to begin contributing to AVfM. Well, after some time speaking with a bunch of other contributors …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/20 01:30 AM
1

Up you go!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/20 06:35 PM
0

No I'm not, you're confusing gay men with sexual activity. Tell you what, learn the distinction between discrimination types 1A, 1B, and Type 2. Then you can have an honest discussion on this matter. Until then, all you're going to do is keep crying "Hurr durr ur discriminating." I want you to know, any and all shaming tactics I've grown absurdly callous to. I know these shaming tactics require a deep level of insecurity to actually affect me. So, save your breath and just stick to the topic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 10:14 PM
2

Because they're not denying me because in I'm a horny white guy, they're denying me because of my sexual activity. How is this difficult for you? Maybe less emotion and more logic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 10:07 PM
1

Disagree
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 10:06 PM
2

Lol. Nonsense. Complete nonsense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 10:05 PM
-2

Sure I am.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 03:34 AM
0

Whatever.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 03:32 AM
0

Exactly what I said. No more, no less. Your strawman fallacies and the so-called "implications" behind what I said are ineffective on me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 03:19 AM
1

How is it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 03:09 AM
0

Yes you are: There's a risk from infected blood. Conflating the two is prejudiced. I never conflated the two. Now move along. And now you're sprinkling in some armchair psychology pseudoscience: I think you're just unable to admit you took a bad position, hence your insistence everyone else move on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 03:03 AM
0

Your fallacy: strawman
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 03:00 AM
0

Luckily for you I made both. Move along. You keep going down this path and you're going to make a jackass of yourself. Strawman fallacies and emotional arguments have no place in scientific discussion. You've done both. People who argue for equality of outcome, are all emotion-based argument. And now you're trying to strawman. Move along, guy. Quit while youre ahead. Medical personnel have a strict duty to ensure that their procedures are conducted with as little risk as possible. You want them …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 02:53 AM
0

Emotional arguments and strawman fallacies have no place in scientific discussions. Move along.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 02:46 AM
0

Spare me your anti-scienctific opinion. It's cool to be open-minded, but not so much that your brain falls out. You are missing the point: not everyone has the right to donate, and no matter what you do with the constitution (turn it upside down, read it backwards, squeeze lemon juice on it) it's not there. You can try to pretend there is no risk, but these facilities are seeking as minimal risk as possible. Which is why they have specific requirements. Businesses and industries are allowed to f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 02:43 AM
0

Well, it doesn't matter what the reason is, they have the right to the same opportunity to apply, but not to the same outcomes. Lifestyle choice also doesn't just stop at having gay sex. If I'm having sex with prostitutes that's a lifestyle choice. I have the same opportunity to apply to donate, and they have the right to not give me the same outcome as the person who doesn't bang prostitutes. I'm saying, you're thinking to narrowly on that. Drug use, eating disorders, pregnancy etc. could also …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 01:25 AM
2

Point still stands. Nowhere in the constitution does it state you have a right to donate blood or plasma. Everyone is afforded the opportunities to donate, but not everyone qualifies. That needs to be said. Medical personnel are allowed to take into consideration lifestyle choices and refuse. Donations are consensual, so let's keep it that way. So, yes, sometimes people do fit into little boxes. It's cool to be progressive with respect to equal opportunities, but do not try and enforce equal out…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/20 11:34 PM
6

On a cultural level, there's a massive stereotype of gay men as promiscuous. This leads to things like men who have sex with men not being allowed to donate blood Okay, but I believe the OP was asking about rights issues. Donating blood isn't exactly a right that is bestowed to everyone. Blood and plasma centers do need to take into account your lifestyle choice, tattoos & piercings, where you've traveled, sexual activity... to name a few. So, from where I stand, that is a nonissue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/20 10:17 PM
1

Just wanted clarity. As I said. I can understand the standards you're enforcing, and I respect them. Thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/20 05:21 PM
2

I have a question I'd like to get out of the way about these low-effort posts: does the perspective have to be from the OP? Or if I had something to add, is that acceptable?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/20 04:32 PM
15

Well, that's sadly all you can do. Dr. Farrell has even stated that #BoysLivesMatter is something we should focus on. For whatever reason or other, when a black dude is killed by police or criminals, the boy part is practically invisible to us. How often are women killed by excessive police use-of-force?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/20 02:42 PM
2

I do think the name does have a significant factor on how it is viewed. I thought that's how euphemisms worked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/20 12:55 PM
12

I'd also add that routine MGM (I'm considering just removing "circumcision" from my vocabulary altogether) places males as the majority victims of sexual assault. I mean, at least until someone can provide me with a term that isn't meant to be a euphemism that downplays the brutality of such barbaric practices, I'm not sure what else to call it. Interesting post, tonsay the least.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/20 02:19 AM
1

Such homophobia. Do you always act this way when you can't remember you're an adult?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/20 03:24 PM
2

Your source made zero mention of Thomas Sowell agreeing with the sentiments of white Genocide. I suggest you check your source before posting them. Calling Obama racist against white is note for what? What are you talking about? Oh wait, are you about to say scandal-free? Lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/20 12:11 AM
2

Prove it. This will be fun to watch you fail. The entire thing, please. Yes, the white genocide part, too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/20 11:58 PM
6

It always fascinates me the lengths to which idiots will try to always be right. When they cant attack the points, they attack the person making the points. When that fails, they go after their employer. Then they go after their agency, and lastly unfalsifiable smears. You people are literally brainless NPCs. Typical SJW. When you can actually refute Dr. Dr. Sowell's points, you will have room to refer to Ben Shapiro and Dave Rubin as idiots. Until then, might want to strengthen your own argumen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/20 10:48 PM
3

Why are you on this sub when you're an obvious fool? See? Me? Because I'm an adult, free and can post and read whatever I want and I don't need thought police like you to try and tell me where I do and do not stand on issues. Try again, SJW.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/20 10:06 PM
6

Right. Because Stanford employees right-wing loonies... I'm more inclined to believe Dr. Sowell than someone who cant even refute the arguments of a lunatic. Literally the feminist narrative about men is identical to the Conservative narrative about blacks (Sowell's own people). You managed to show you have not read a damn thing written by Thonas Sowell. It's ironic you remark on the feminist narrative about men, while in the same sentence invoking a false narrative against Dr. Sowell. Anywho, w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/20 09:34 PM
2

I will forever give the D.
/r/askTRP30/05/20 02:56 AM
3

Then don't throw the bag of food in the fucking first place, you clod. It's that simple.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/20 11:34 PM
2

Never made the argument that it did. I just don't buy the bullshit narrative that the cops became robbers and robbers became cops, that's something you buy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/20 11:33 PM
15

I remember last time I was on a thread and there were those people who were talking about how his response was excessive. Ummm, no, if she didn't throw the food in the first place, it wouldn't have happened at all. Definite indicators of people who grew up in coddle suburban neighborhoods, especially if they cant understand that any time you initiate a confrontation, you don't get to cry foul when things go awry.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/20 02:38 PM
10

Did something similar, but was subsequently hired by Jimmy John's. Not joking.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/20 02:35 PM
2

Awwww what's that? A lesson learned about why you don't throw shit at people? How humbling.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/20 02:33 PM
2

Right. The cops became robbers and robbers became cops. I can't believe so many people believe that nonsense. Literally a story a 10-year-old would make up. The Democrats were right wing, and Republicans were left wing until one day they shook hands and switched sides. You have to be naive to believe that. I'll stick to historical facts rather than try and spew whatever historical revisionism you're attempting. I can hardly stifle an eyeroll when someone tries to pretend that the Democrats are a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/20 02:07 PM
-2

That's fine, but you don't go around lecturing Americans on whether their rights are constitutional or not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/20 12:13 AM
1

Well, then I guess they shouldn't begin by judging Americans as losers who are uneducated about their own country. That's the vitriol the Europeans create when they behave this way. Want to have informed opinions on the politics, go for it. But in the end you're not a voter and your opinion means less than nothing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 10:49 PM
0

Yeah, because I don't know what else you would call that level of arrogance. That you can lecture other people on their politics and their country's problems. Not saying they cant have an opinion, just saying to disregard it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 10:37 PM
-3

Why? I don't expect Europeans to let me lecture them on their politics when we have our own issues to concern ourselves with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 10:12 PM
0

Nah, just saying we can disregard your opinion on American politics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 10:11 PM
-4

Lol! Let me put it to you this way: I have a dwarf hamster who is going on 2 years old. His name is Joey and he's just the most adorable little thing. HE has more weight to discuss American politics than you do (I would also wager he would be more well-informed) and he's a sentient creature who just likes to run around on his wheel and sleep in his own excrement. I'm glad you outed yourself as a European, though. This means any time you comment with some opinion you have on Americans or their po…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 09:28 PM
-2

Well, then stop explaining American politics to Americans. We don't care what Europeans have to say about our politics because your opinions are worthless. Spend time educating your own countrymen and worry about the shit in your own yard before you lecture other countries about theirs. That European arrogance you possess, the one that compels you to believe you are in anyway capable of discussing American politics better than Americans, is precisely why theres an increasing number of us who sim…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 09:13 PM
0

Well, you just publicly admitted you cant read. I said I'm not entertaining your armchair psychology pseudoscience anymore. You anti-vax, flat-earth, quasi intellectuals are some of the worst when it comes to reading. Point stands. Try again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 09:09 PM
0

Not entertaining any of your armchair psychology pseudoscience. Point stands. Try again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 07:52 PM
2

Sounds like a lot of the mod team actually has a life. I know you posted this to ask for support, but honestly, I'm glad the mods are spread thin because it shows you have an active life outside of Reddit. Some mods spend WAY too much time on Reddit, and it might not be the case here. Do you have any specific users in mind to help moderate the sub?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 07:33 PM
-1

Spare me the armchair psychology pseudoscience or feminist shaming tactics, I don't entertain it, nor 99% of the shit you're flinging my way. Try again.... If you cant refute what a so-called holocaust denier has to say, you are less credible than the holocaust denier... or maybe, be better than ad hominem fallacies. Just saying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 06:40 PM
-1

Holocause denier Yeah, yeah... you want to preach about bias tainting information while you're on a thread slinging out an unfalsifiable smear. I get it. Everyone to the right of you is a Holocaust Denier, and no sane person has any reason to take you seriously on the matter. Spare me the unfalsifiable smear, I've listened to her a few times now, and blah blah blah... Holocaust Denier, anti-vaxxer, blah blah blah. Not sure how she can hold extreme left and right-wing views at the same time, but …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 05:42 PM
-1

Yep, you can quote me all day, and I have examples of Democrats treating black republicans like shit all because they didn't toe the line. This very entitlement to their allegiance is precisely the same entitlement slaveowners possessed. Just because it has been churched up, doesn't mean the tactic isn't deployed. Democrats are still pro-slavery. They still seek to have a destabilized nuclear family in the black community, the advocate for measures and laws which make it harder for black citizen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 02:57 PM
-3

Your argument is literally "Look, people from this party in 1945 voted to do this or that, so the party is bad". Nope, but thanks for playing. Move along, and go shill for the KKK elsewhere. My whole point is that politics and political views change, that is a good thing, you have to keep up with the times, not be stale in your conservative views "because this is what we have done". Be progressive, think how can we be better and implement that. Yep. And for starters, progressivism includes not b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 02:28 PM
2

The takeaway here isn't to take her word for gospel. The big takeaway is to examine the statistical range itself. It ranges between 2% and 41%. There are so questions to be had about the Eugene Kanin study's methodology, and by all means, raise them. However, you have to ask yourself if false rape allegations are closer to 2% or 41% of all rape cases. Then also consider other variables such as the type of allegation when it isn't a rape allegation (domestic violence, child abuse, etc.). Also, if…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 02:16 PM
-3

Correct. Democrats fought viciously to preserve slavery.... they also started the KKK, opposed the black right to vote, made promises in the new deal to get the black vote, never delivered on those promises, intervened thousands of Japanese-Americans, opposed civil rights, oppose a stable nuclear family, opposed their 2A rights, instituted the welfare state to destroy black families, and feels entitled to the black vote. With all of this in mind, anyone who chooses to vote Democrat either doesn'…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 02:11 PM
-2

Sure she does...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 02:04 PM
1

Your fallacy: Appeal to definition. You're saying this is bad right, just so I know what I'm arguing about? Yep. Cause what I'm trying to say that ideally the above is good and practically we've never been in a position to implement it properly. This is a bizarre level of mental gymnastics. The ideas are good, but they've never been implemented properly? Wrong. They're shitty ideas in theory and even worse when put into practice. I'm thinking full modern world digital transparency and decision m…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 11:04 PM
3

Almost called you an asshole for this, until I realized I agreed with you. Let me correct myself: WE are assholes. Lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/20 04:57 PM
1

I know socialism is bad, anyone with two brain cells knows socialism is bad. Thanks for playing. Perhaps you learned a valuable lesson: don't lob yourself into debates you are ill-equipped to have.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 04:18 PM
1

Yeah, definitely. And guess what, we have the Chinese Communist Party to blame... man, the tally just keeps racking up against socialism and socialist ideas, wouldn't you say? Nice attempt at the whataboutism, though. It really brought attention to how even during a global pandemic the policies that prove to suck.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 02:09 AM
1

Yeah, a bunch of hogwash that is completely irrelevant. You're just arguing to argue at this point. Go pick up an economics book and quit trying to pretend the facts are more complicated than they are. Those leaders successfully implemented socialism, because that was socialism's design I am sorry you don't understand this fact. Again, I'm not certain how many times countries need to fail before you acknowledge the ideas of socialism are all garbage with zero nuance. Oh, wait, but the right pers…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 03:22 PM
1

Well, facts are either true or false, black or white, if you will. Facts don't care about your feelings. You have to admit that your inability to make fundamental distinctions means you're ill-equipped to have the discussion. I recommend you read some Thomas Sowell.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/20 11:55 PM
6

Okay. Can you elaborate? Where is there bias against women? We have diversity quotas and affirmative action, we have people who are demanding 50% female representation, and women have a lower rate of unemployment. So, with that in mind, what bias against women are you talking to?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 03:38 PM
10

Alright. I bite. Where is there bias against women? Edit: Jesus, don't downvote the dude right off the bat.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 03:23 PM
1

Right. Had nothing to do with the systems they follow. Its starts with China's famine, but once you add up the deaths in other countries, it becomes apparent. And you want to be disingenuous and pretend the men didn't incorporate the system's design fruitfully? Okay.... but the facts state otherwise. Sorry. Again, you are ill-equipped for this discussion, and you best move along. At least until you can distinguish between a socialist economy and a non socialist economy. Case-in-point, you're try…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/20 01:41 PM
0

Sure I am.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/20 07:16 PM
0

Ah, so your tactic is to refer to me as obsessed because I've actually read her books rather than only listened to her soundbites? Okay then. The part that oversimplifies the relationship between men and women as one of oppressor/oppressed. That's the revisionist history, because it is an oversimplification. Do you disagree that they oversimplify and even intentionally mischaracterize the relationship dynamics between men and women?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/20 04:46 PM
1

Lol! Right, our economy has resulted in the deaths over 100M people in the course of one century.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 02:50 PM
0

Nope. I'm saying your gross oversimplification of history, much like how feminists like to communicate it, is disingenuous at best. I've read quite a few of her books and you just admitted to only listening to soundbites. And I can claim you're outclassed when I've read more on the matter than you have. You are the one spewing utter nonsense. More specifically feminist historical nonsense. The kind of feminist nonsense that framed history as a power grab by men over women. If you want to pretend…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/20 02:49 PM
0

Wait, so you've read none of her books? Such a bummer. I was hoping we could actually have a chat about her, but alas you have disappointed me. Yes, it was. Feminist revision, which also means, idiotic feminists didn't understand history and so they rewrote it to fit their narrative. Just stop, guy. You're outclassed in this discussion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/20 06:20 AM
0

To say that ALL feminism is based on manhating... doesn't that sound like the feminists who say ALL men oppress women? Nope. Not at all. Because men and women are unmeasured, arbitrary states of being, not ideologies. I also urge you to quit parroting feminist historical revisionism, because you're going to risk draining nuance from the discussion. With that said, MY MAN! You've read a book or two of her's haven't you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/20 03:25 AM
16

Never underestimate the presence of right-wing gynocentricism. Anywho. I love this subreddit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 08:25 PM
1

Oooooohhhh a Kafkatrap. Been a while since one of them was thrown at me. What other little cute treasures do you have to aid in making a fool of yourself. By the way, I'm not moving this discussion forward until you address my point. Denial isn't a rebuttal. Unless you're going to try and affirm that feminists actually do care about conservative women, then in which case: Ahahahahahahahahahahahahhaa!!! And quit shilling for CHS. I don't care too much about what grifters have to say.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 08:21 PM
1

Are you going to address my point which points out your flawed premise?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 07:59 PM
2

Feminism is simply just the advocacy for women's rights. That's what they say, but their actions speak louder than words. They're not advocates for women's rights. You have to be disingenuous to make this argument. This is because feminism is does not approve of women who vote conservative. If feminism was one-woman advocacy, they wouldn't prioritize their entitlement to women's allegiance over the choices those women are allowed to make. This argument sailed away from me a long time ago. Sommer…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 07:52 PM
3

Well, when someone starts off their comment with, "Well, I've only seen..." that's pretty much a cue that what you're about to hear next is not something productive to the discussion. I was crass in point it out, but my point stands. I didn't entertain it any further because doing so send the implicit message their nonsense is reasonable enough to be brought to the discussion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 05:30 PM
1

Some of those are communist like North Korea which denies basic freedoms and goods including food. No, North Korea is a socialist economy. I'm out. I'm not willing to debate a damn fool. Just this alone tells me you're not willing to have an honest discussion. Move along.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/20 05:21 PM
1

There is no positive advocacy for an ideology based in supremacy. If you wish to deny this, it's your hill to die on. But don't taint the rest of the thread with your bullshit cherrypicking of feminism. You sound like Boogie when he said that good things came from the Nazis. Your attempt at the middle ground is going to fail. Because you are ignorant to feminist history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 04:55 PM
2

The ideology is based in female empowerment and advocacy. No, it isn't. It's based in supremacy. Go ahead... say I'm bullshitting. Which is the reason to frame domestic work as unpaid labor. To avoid the diminishing of the work that people who aren't in the paid workforce, but still contribute in roles that we both agree are equally important. Nope. I don't agree with putting a metric on the immeasurable contributions these domestic workers perform. If you want to put a dollar sign to raising ch…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 04:38 PM
1

Nope. Just saying that you sound like you roll and in an echo chamber and have the wool pulled over your eyes, and are trying to pull it over other people's eyes. I've encountered hundreds you rodents before.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 04:35 PM
4

I mean it's not really an argument because I could say the exact same thing to you, that your stuck in an echo chamber as well. First off, you never made an argument to begin with. But let's look at the last part of your statement here. You said that you could make the same argument about me. No, you can't. Because I'm not the one who specified: I've only seen emotional labour targeted at... I've only seen . . . Echo chamber mantra Yes. Someone who rolls in an echo chamber would literally ONLY s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 04:33 PM
6

Generally, when one paints with a broad brush, one gets outside the lines. Well, this is not one of those general situations. This is a specific situation. The ideology is based in man-hatred, therefore anyone who adheres to the ideology is complicit with the hatred. Feminism is ONLY hostile towards men. I've read their publications, press releases, studies, data, etc. But I think you're letting your anger take you past the point of productive discussion. Well, then I guess you're not thinking. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 04:25 PM
15

I've only seen emotional labour targeted at families where the man didn't understand that staying at home with kids is harder than it looks. That's because you roll in an echo chamber, Dawg. Nothing I said was disingenuous. The term is used in feminist camps. Feminists hate men. This is no secret. So, it's not a far cry that they would frame humanizing men as labor. This is a problem, because feminists are lazy in every capacity, and do not like to work. This is reflected in how their publicatio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 03:46 PM
21

Emotional labor is a bullshit term used by feminists who don't want their women to treat their men like human beings. They frame trying to display empathy, compassion, and understanding towards their man, as "emotional labor." Basically, when you see this, it's a bad faith argument that you can be sure is being used by someone who has a history of toxic relationships. I had a woman say this to me, once upon a time. It means she doesn't give a shit about you. Just next the broad, and go find your…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 01:56 PM
1

It failed. Don't try to defend this ideology. The only difference between socialists and Nazis is that it's not socially acceptable to go around talking about how Nazism has never been properly tried. The ideology only destroys (just like Nazism), and we have a sample size of tens of millions to support that.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/20 06:33 AM
1

Socialism has never worked anywhere. It's that simple. On the other hand you have your great capitalism, which seems to have brought us to end of world times, but other options are not to be tried because they suck. There is different versions of socialism. Correct... and they all suck. Splitting hairs wont save you here.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/20 06:24 AM
1

Right. Well, not sure how many leaders need to try the same failed system which results in the deaths of tens of millions of people before you entertain the possibility that it isn't just the leaders, it's the system itself. It was socialism that ruined those places. Venezuela has a vast proven oil reserve and socialism still couldn't flourish. Those leaders followed the system, and it failed because that's what socialism does.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/20 12:17 AM
1

They're actually socialist. If you can't even acknowledge that little fact, then this conversation will not be productive. Conflating social programs with socialism is also another example you don't know what you are talking about. Edit: if you want to want to affirm that an economy does better when it's heavily regulated, you need to reexamine the other countries I listed and tell me if you think those places es are better off.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/20 01:53 PM
1

Well, there are several countries with tens of millions of people that affirm all evidence to the contrary. North Korea, China, Venezuela, Ehtiopia, Latvia, Cuba, and blah blah blah.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/20 12:45 AM
0

😴😴😴😴
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 10:32 PM
0

😴😴😴😴
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 09:57 PM
0

😴😴😴😴 You really can't handle a victory. I'd hate to see what would have happened if I actually decide to out a bit of effort.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 09:27 PM
0

Already you the winner. Not sure what further validation you need, but whatever. I don't have time to argue with someone who clearly knows less about a topic than I do. All the best, richionne!
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 09:17 PM
1

Yeah. Yeah yeah... I get it. I am whatever unfalsifiable smear you declare me to be. I'm officially bored. You're not interested in discussion, you want to be right. So I'm letting you have this victory because you clearly need it. So, you win. I'm a shill and the VA is horrible and never does anything good.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 09:04 PM
1

This is called moving the goalpost. Again, something only idiots do. I answered your question. Truth hurts, I guess. Anyway, move along. I'm bored of this discussion.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 08:54 PM
1

So tell us more about how the VA is helpful? Let's see... the post-911 GI Bill, vocational rehabilitation, VA home loan, free health insurance. There are resources to aid veterans on getting housing, financial aid, legal help, food resources. But yes, keep cherrypicking. Maybe you should quit while you are ahead before you make an even bigger jackass of yourself. I said x, you read it as y. Not sure how much more of your inability to read you need to displayed but it's slowly drifting from amusi…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 08:42 PM
1

Why would I be mad that you can't read?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 05:58 PM
1

I LOVE IT! You can't read and made a fool of yourself. Rather than saying, "Gee, yeah. That's fair. I could have been a bit more socratic by asking him to elaborate," you went the fun route for me. Because now I can just spend this glorious Monday telling you what a fucking moron you are. And how you entered the thread just screamed desperation to be right.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 05:17 PM
0

Neither. I said not too bad, but I didn't say great. You're either an illiterate retard or a faggot. My guess is a little of column A, a little of column B. Perhaps try not strapping on an addendum to what people say next time. Idiot.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 05:11 PM
11

during service you better be fucking dying if you go to medical because.all doc is gonna tell you is take some Motrin and change your socks. Lol! Too true for combat jobs, but not sure about non-combat jobs. Just because the medical and dental is free doesn't mean it's quality I'll take, "Solid Arguments Against Socialism" for $500, Alex.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 05:43 AM
0

Not too bad, imo, and I fought and fought and fought.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 05:41 AM
3

The transgender thing is more about how they would come in, complete basic training, AIT, and any other schools prior to their first duty station. From there, the issue would come down to Soldier readiness. Do you think you can deploy a post-OP transgender to war? Or is there perhaps a recovery process? Because we know the transition process is a long one, and could take years. So, by the end of the contract all you got was a transitioning trooper, but they essentially didn't train for what they…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 03:27 AM
7

Perhaps, but I've never worked at McDonald's, so I don't know as much about their benefits. I've heard as far as fast-food goes, they're not bad. So, technically, by definition, it wouldn't be easier. Lol.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 03:14 AM
20

Just hope you don't get permanent injuries because you will never get compensated. Precisely this. This is why I usually encourage everyone not to be stupid like I was and join combat arms. I usually steer people towards Navy, Air Force, or Coast Guard where combat injuries are less likely to occur. The necessity of the Wounded Warrior Project is all the proof you need. Absolutely. I encourage everyone to donate to them as often as possible. I love that such an organization exists as a safety ne…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/20 02:05 AM
194

Yes, great benefits. Both during and after service. To describe it as slavery is disingenuous. I would more describe it as a Faustian bargain. Plus, it's a 100% volunteer military.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 11:05 PM
3

So many feminists and members of the alt right are similar in the way they often ignore any appeal to reason or fact. Couldn't agree more, and they both prioritize identity politics. Once you challenge them they have to respond with sneering labels to put you in a box. My personal favorite from label from each side: bigot from the ctrl-left, and race traitor from the alt-right. These are, by far, my favorite smears to be called.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/20 03:56 PM
12

Of course... unfalsifiable smears. What is a giant feminist echo chamber without unfalsifiable smears?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/20 03:32 PM
1

Hahahaha! I had a woman who tried this shit with me some months ago. Tried to get me to send her $400 because her car was broken. She started off trying to be cool, like "We're friends" and all that shit. It didn't work, and try to contain your shock when I say that after a week, I never heard from her again.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 03:49 PM
7

Perhaps, but the issue is, the intersectional crowd is very much rules for thee, not for me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/20 06:30 AM
7

I agree. I'm not even sure how we got the point where presumption of innocence was scene as bad. I'm guessing it has to do with the outrage mobs shooting first (not literally) and asking questions never.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/20 04:22 AM
1

Nope. Not at all. Why? Lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/20 06:16 PM
3

Feminists are an exceptionally stupid group of people, so I'm not surprised their gross oversimplification has managed to fool them into believing this shit. Imagine that, an ideology that bases all of its assertions on arguing in bad faith about men is an ideology that hates men. It's funny to see feminists too stupid to understand that women aren't typically attracted to unemployed losers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/20 01:39 AM
8

Oh I've heard that, too. Even Hillary Clinton said that women were the primary victims of war. Never mind the fact that the dude just got blown to bits. I've encountered similar discussions before. I usually just make fun of them when they make such absurd claims, and usually make it into a caricature to show them how idiotic they sound. My man died, and intentionally left me with the kids, expenses, and burdens that accompany family emergencies. I'm now worse off than he is. The response is usu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/20 08:13 PM
47

Because a man who killed himself isn't a worse outcome than a woman who wants to kill herself. Men are not considered human in the way women are. Men are only considered human when there's something to be gained from them. In this case, to serve as a callous whataboutism to deflect from a legit men's issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/20 05:53 AM
3

No need... it was simple. All I had to do was just exist and have a penis between my legs, punch in some shit on a keyboard, and make the conscious decision to hit 'save.' The ban just came naturally.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/20 10:19 PM
4

I've been banned from that shithole for over half a decade now. Lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/20 08:39 PM
11

I've been looking for a post to get me banned from /r/politics. This might be the case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/20 02:54 PM
14

When we landed a probe on a comet and feminists were more concerned with scantily clad caricatures of women on a bowling shirt designed by the dude's [not that it matters, female] friend. When I began to see arguments about the shirt being a compelling variable in discouraging women from pursuing STEM fields, it showed just how weak that feminists perceive women. Really? Your reason for shitting on the man's greatest career accomplishment and publicly shaming him because you don't like his shirt…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/20 03:53 PM
8

Oh yeah, definitely. This sub is not far-left enough. One of the very reasons I subscribed was because this sub would eventually end up on some big-league shit-list (congratulations to the mods, btw). If/when they come for the sub, I suggest the mods start getting snapshots of posts. Especially considering the rumors of the admins ghost editing people's comments, coupled with the capability to do so. To the LWMA who is about to be smeared as a racist, sexist, transphobic, blah blah blah... it's …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/20 03:10 PM
0

I've provided you evidence, that you've continuously denied. Now you're on here trying to proselytize your self defeatist ideology. You're trying to sell people the idea that it's impossible to succeed in a society that offer equality of opportunity, all because not everyone gets a good outcome. So I'm going to call it what it is: pathetic drivel from someone who made bad decisions and still hasn't learned that life isn't fair. It takes a weak-minded fool to sell the idea of failure to the masse…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/20 03:00 PM
0

Distributed equitably? You're a fucking loser and so everyone who makes more than you needs to make sure have enough to be a parasite? Yeah no, reality doesn't care about your feelings, and reality mocks your shitty logic. But, I love your philosophy of doctors need to be paid more than athletes just because. Free markets are like Santa Claus. Lol. No they're not. South Korea is a free market economy, and they're doing better than the income equal neighbors to the North. If you want us to be mor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/20 01:12 AM
0

Did he produce more utility than the man who cured polio? No. Because he was a professional athlete, not a medical professional. So because he wasn't a medical professional who crafted a vaccine, or didn't possess a job that's altruistic enough for you, so therefore he doesn't ACTUALLY deserve that money. Fuck off with this logic. Considering how much he has invested towards philanthropy, your arrogance is deafening. Michael Jordan is a clear example of the markets failing to equitably reward la…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/20 05:17 AM
1

Struck a nerve, did I? 😂
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/20 05:45 PM
-1

Lol. Moron. You are absolutely wrong, or you are intentionally lying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/20 05:32 PM
-2

^ This comment brought to you by Loser Logic. Where fucking losers try to sell you a self-defeating attitude because their life sucks and they made bad decisions. Would you like proof that you're an idiot? Here, let me help you: Just look at Bezos. Dude pays zero taxes despite being the richest human being on Earth atm. It's honestly so baffling that you can make an objectively false statement in the same comment you claim to be a business major. Either you're a fucking idiot or you are intentio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/20 05:27 PM
-2

The problem is that people don't get 100M by working hard. False. I'm not sure how this mentality of everyone who has $100M fucked someone over to get it, but it's 100% bullshit. People get 100M by being deceitful, selfish leeches who steal from the rest of us. Yeah, no, they don't. You buy their products. They didn't deceive you into purchasing your iPhone. You use social media of your own choosing. Nobody leeched off of you to get you to agree to that consensual business arrangement. Or by inh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/20 05:05 PM
1

And? That's what the market could bear at the time. Michael Jordan knew he was worth more than 50k/ year. Try again. Remember, the original claim was that no one works for that much money. Wrong. Michael Jordan is just one person who worked for that money.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/20 05:00 PM
300

Better question: how does it feel to be the same sex as the woman who gave birth to Donald Trump?
/r/MensRights14/04/20 04:01 AM
-1

No, Michael Jordan didn't work for his millions. Really? He played basketball and became one of the greatest of all time. He understood to be the best, you had to beat the best. To beat the best, you need to work better than them. He spent hours upon hours on the court running drills, shooting drills, passing drills, agility drills. He worked hard to be recruited by University of North Carolina, and drafted to the NBA where he had an illustrious career. You know the NBA, right? The league where …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/20 12:01 AM
0

Yep. Thanks. Don't see where I insulted 99.9999...% of the population, and I don't care for your addendums, either. Thanks for playing. Now move along, I don't explain myself to retards who make an active effort to misunderstand me. And spare me the accusations that I just called 99.9999...% of the population retards.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 03:19 PM
0

Really? Hmmm that's weird... I don't see that written anywhere. Are you sure you're responding to the correct comment?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 03:10 PM
0

There's an old saying: If you toss a stone into a pack of hounds, the one that holla is the one you hit. But, not that's not what I said... I didn't insult 99.9999...% of the population.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 03:04 PM
1

My actual argument is D: none of the above.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 02:38 AM
15

This isn't even their final form. Feminists don't just want laws like this, they also want to abolish the statute of limitations so that any woman can come forward whenever she wants, no questions asked, no evidence required, no need for innocent until proven guilty. At this point, if I lived in Spain, I'd leave. If leaving wasn't an option, it looks like I'm going MGTOW (at least Level 3).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 02:00 AM
1

I never made the argument that the Democrats universally agreed he deserved it. Is reading hard for all of you Democrat shills? Again, even the so-called weak argument you have yet to provide a rebuttal against. What chance do you have when I actually expend effort and give you my stronger arguments? Still waiting on the rebuttal, though.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 01:48 AM
0

Well, the free market would disagree with you, unless you're going to tell me that Amazon just fell out of the sky, and the device you're typing this bullshit on did just magically appear in your hand. Now answer my question. Because I would love for you to make such a stupid remark to guys like Michael Jordan who would own you where you stand. You mean to tell me that Michael Jordan didn't work for his millions and billions? Go ahead and say that you don't think he worked for that money. Just b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 12:16 AM
0

No, how about this? You actually provide a direct rebuttal against the argument you claim is weak. I mean surely you have to understand that if your rebuttal is weaker than the argument, then perhaps your best bet is to spend more time coming up with stronger rebuttals as opposed to declaring the arguments you haven't and can't refute them. And considering that he had strong partisan leadership despite being the worst President in history is sound proof. Yes worse than Jimmy Carter, worse than L…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 11:19 PM
1

Still waiting on a rebuttal. You've not put one out. Since you're now saying my argument is weak to begin with, it say a lot about you being unable to refute a weak argument that still hasn't been touched 0/10. Point stands. If you want to cry about blind allegiance to Trump, then acknowledge it was more apparent for Obama (someone who got an actual Nobel Peace Prize despite killing dozens of civilians).
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:54 PM
5

So if I work my entire life, and manage to accrue a wealth of $100M, your opinion is that the government has the right to come and seize 90% of my assets?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/20 09:10 PM
1

Point stands, if you to discuss unconditional partisan support, Obama's Nobel Peace Prize is all the proof we need to see the hypocrisy of the left. How many Democrats spoke out against him receiving that award? No goalpost moved. I rate your shitty rebuttal 1/10. Either try again (and perhaps an actual rebuttal), or fuck off.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 08:37 PM
2

I'll tell you what... when President Trump gets a Nobel Peace Prize, we can talk about Syria and bombing other countries.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 06:34 PM
2

Yeah, no, I don't debate damn fools. I'm out. It's impossible to debate someone who pulls the shit you just did.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 06:33 PM
0

Not sure how that is relevant to what I said.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 05:04 PM
4

Right-wing politics is built on the foundation of tribalism. After you said... That's absolutely not something that describes the left. In response to... Let this be a lesson for you... Leftists don't have principles. They only care if something is "against their tribe" or "for their tribe". I'm saying your argument could also be made for the left. You don't think the left possesses a tribalistic foundation? Let's run through the list of tribalistic exploits deployed under left-wing politics. Wh…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 04:12 PM
0

You could make the same arguement for the left. They're both stern ideologies, don't act like one is different from the other in that regard.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 03:52 PM
2

So she was raped by a guy and continued to live with him afterwards? Do you really want to be associated with someone who is complicit with rape? But in all seriousness, run. She can just as easily go around and tell people you raped her. Then, suddenly, you're no longer a virgin anymore. The fact is, when women say they had sex with a man, they're believed. When men say they had sex with a woman, they're met with skepticism. When women says they didn't have sex with a man, they're believed. Whe…
/r/askTRP10/04/20 07:55 PM
2

She addresses that towards the very end of the film.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/20 06:31 PM
13

Either way what? She saw them as the enemy and upon actually listening, she learned that they were misrepresented. You can't honestly expect people to believe you're all about equality when you act so dismissive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/20 12:11 AM
30

I believe that it's more accurate to say that she saw them as the enemy (past tense). Feminists are bizarre in how they try to prevent people from hearing what MRAs have to say about men's issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/20 10:36 PM
21

I just hit submit on this to see if it had been posted here. Cassie Jaye is a left-wing former feminist, and it blew my mind that a left wing male advocate who has produced one of the most profound documentaries addressing male issues, has yet to have her TedTalk posted here. She discusses her greatest challenges of filming The Red Pill.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/20 09:37 PM
1

Definitely need to check out this speech.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/20 01:21 AM
1

The point is that there is regret, and there is an underlying issue. Whether that figure is 3% or 40% it doesn't Very few feminists actually think that abortion is all-around a good experience or a positive thing. Actions speak louder than words, and judging by how vocally celebrated abortion is, I honestly cant agree with this statement. So, no, it isn't a strawman. I was a feminist for years and know for a fact that abortion is celebrated in feminist circles. Feminists are people, but they're …
/r/MensRights31/03/20 08:31 PM
3

He gets his due process, but with that said he is a creepy man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/20 03:21 PM
1

Allow me to clarify. First off, I'm anti-abortion, but we are not talking about that. That isn't the matter I'm addressing within the abortion topic. My issue is with feminists downplaying the negative impacts on women's mental health. I'm not saying that there is a super huge major ultra mega problem, but I did hear through the female criminals podcast that up to around 30 - 40% of women experience mental health decline post-abortion. I would consider the procedure itself to be quite invasive a…
/r/MensRights31/03/20 02:14 PM
1

Well, unfortunately for you that isnt my point. So, yes, it is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 04:53 AM
2

Point stands. Whataboutism is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 04:55 PM
1

Just realized I have never been summoned for jury duty.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 04:55 PM
2

Agreed. Have you decided on whether you will apply for citzienship?
/r/MensRights30/03/20 03:47 PM
2

You have no voting?
/r/MensRights30/03/20 03:30 PM
1

That may be one of the dumbest insults, but I had someone try going through 3 years of my post history to try and prove I'm an incel. It pissed them off when I've posted in "literally every other subreddit" they dislike except for that one. Lol Places like TiA, KiA, MR, PPD, TRP, and way more.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 02:46 PM
3

I find it funny when I get called that and I've had sex in the past 24 - 48 hours.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 02:04 AM
23

I would argue that yeah, it has gotten worse, but in a different kind of way not comparable to tossing molotov cocktails into buildings. They've managed to infiltrate academia, the media, and government-backed programs. They've managed to hijack the narrative to control the dialogue on gender issues. They've made publication after publication that is any combination of misleading, poorly compiled, manipulated, wrong, or outright dishonest. They've contributed to the rise in single motherhood eff…
/r/MensRights30/03/20 01:36 AM
7

Here's what I said: Raising children is a tough job. I did not say: Raising children is the toughest job.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 01:05 AM
7

Damn right!!!
/r/MensRights29/03/20 09:42 PM
11

It's not hard. Plus, guys are typically cool with compromise if you show us we are not getting the short end of the stick in the transaction. To most guy, a meal you don't have to cook is worth a few dirty dishes and wiping down the kitchen.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 09:30 PM
13

Oh god... you're a single mom. Godspeed and I wish you the best of luck. I'm petrified of having children, but for you to raise them on your own... damn. Tough. I hope you make it a point then to read Dr. Farrell's book on The Boy Crisis because he suggests some excellent dad-style parenting strategies for single mom's to incorporate into their practices. Things like rough housing, tree-climbing, etc. I'm the same way, though. If I were a stay at home parent, I would make sure the house and yard…
/r/MensRights29/03/20 09:23 PM
2

Not sure how the solution to countering bad arguments is to do nothing. Wikipedia SHOULD be a source of objective, u idealistic knowledge, and not a playground for internet kiddies. I couldn't agree with you more. The problem is that it isn't any of those things, nor could it ever be. The best medicine against bad ideas are good ideas, not standing idly by as the feminist movement continues to smear men as oppressive brutes.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 09:19 PM
40

With respects, when you start diving down the rabbit hole into feminist history, you will be disturbed at the shit you read about. Feminism is not about equality, it never has been about equality, and it will never be about equality. Basically, I'm telling you that what you've been led to believe about feminism's history is probably about 50% revisionism mixed with 48% bullshit, and factual information, innocent errors, and sanity all comprise the remaining 2% of the pie. Feminism has white supr…
/r/MensRights29/03/20 09:11 PM
37

I definitely don't want to be treated like a man...no offense. None taken. I mean, I do want equal pay and the same basic rights obviously. Not unreasonable. But to have to be drafted into the military, Hmmm. I'm going to address this so that you understand. You and I both can agree that voting is constitutional right for all Americans, right? Well, the original intent behind the draft was for it to be an agreement that the men would get the right to vote in exchange for being willing to lay dow…
/r/MensRights29/03/20 09:08 PM
95

Yep. Pretty much. I've been told I'm a misogynist for the better part of a decade now, all because I oppose feminism. Kind of funny, because this pretty much demonstrates that feminism is so full of shit, it has to try to mask itself as a demographic it claims is possessed. Women like you have developed a profound sense of integrity. Warren Farrell discussed this when he talked about Cassie Jaye's transition from feminist to non-feminist (don't think she's an anti-fem, specifically, but who care…
/r/MensRights29/03/20 08:54 PM
57

You'll find a lot of horsehit in the mainstream subreddits. Just remember the exact reason why feminists don't like for women to be treated like men: because they know it would technically be a downgrade.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 08:45 PM
3

It's such a distinct conflict in worldview that it's almost impossible to continue arguing they're the same once you become aware of this. I have no beef with a movement that hopes to enact change, nor do I have a problem with a group that seeks to focus on themselves individually.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 08:43 PM
7

I remember being this stupid once upon a time. I couldn't distinguish between MGTOW and MRAs. Either this person will learn it, or they won't.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 04:03 PM
14

I plan to do a 5K. I want to take pledges, set up a webpage where people could track their money, and donate to a men's DV shelter. As the 5K gets closer, I will post more details here and if anyone would like to pledge some money, I'd greatly appreciate it. I'm still working out of some the details, myself, but this is something I want to do. Plus, I think I can still run 5k in under 20 minutes.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 04:00 PM
12

Well, I guess that's unfortunate then. Since there trying the same tired old shaming tactics they won't be able to shame me into being a simp.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 03:57 PM
12

They may call it a "fear of committment" but I call it being safe
/r/MensRights29/03/20 03:55 PM
8

Under the guise of "what's best for the child." What a joke.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/20 03:45 AM
14

Damn... this is just beyond messed up. Want proof that child support is not in the best interest of the child? This serves as a prime example.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/20 03:11 AM
6

I'll let them in on a secret: I've been explicitly informed by my ONS partners that they don't care about my pleasure. I don't take it personally, because it isn't her responsibility to get me off, nor is it mine to get her off.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/20 01:32 AM
6

Absurdity. I'd say a ONS is the perfect way to treat someone like a human. Help them fulfill a carnal urge, then leave and never see them again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/20 01:15 AM
5

Wait what? They're opposed to one-night stands? Why? One-night stands are fun and consequence-free. I would think any situation where the woman doesn't face the consequences of sex would be a good thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/20 01:10 AM
1

Yep, and that's precisely how socialism works.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/20 02:55 PM
1

communism is just capitalism controlled by the state Stopped reading here. I can't believe the epic failure with this claim. Absolutely nothing about it has any validity. If this were true, then the problems of North Korea could be blamed on capitalism. Since there's no capitalism to be found in North Korea, it's safe to say that you can't argue capitalism as the centralized power is communism in action.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/20 01:28 PM
1

To be fair, some of the concerns raised by that redditor are valid. Even if their characterization of feminism is wrong, the concerns are not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/20 01:12 PM
1

Why are you asking? It doesn't change the fact that it's illegal to cross the border without going through the immigration process
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 03:14 PM
1

What does "human trafficking" even mean? Are you saying it's "trafficking" if you have to pay someone to get on a boat or a caravan? Nope. Somehow I suspect you'd still oppose it if they didn't have to pay for it. No shit. The guy who opposes illegal immigration would still oppose illegal immigration even if they don't pay someone to help them illegally enter the country. Also I have no idea what you mean about child negligence. Are you saying it's negligent to oppose detention of children? Nope…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 01:40 PM
8

Definitely this is something men should address more explicitly. We can definitely lay out what women can bring to the table, but men need to do more to voice our contributions to personal relationships and society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/20 06:43 AM
3

Perhaps this one? Abbott, A. Testosterone link to aggression may be all in the mind. Nature (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2009.1131 EDIT: if this isn't it, shoot me some more details about what to search for. Authors, publication, key terms, etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/20 05:25 AM
2

Well. Then I guess they shouldn't have tried to illegally cross our borders. Personally, I think the parents who haul their kids along should be charged with crimes against children to make sure they're NEVER allowed into the US legally. If the people made the decision to put themselves in that position, they're violent. The way they endanger their children is violent. So no, ICE is not more violent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/20 02:01 AM
2

22+? As in less than 2 dozen people? Yeah, no, now I definitely call bs to the original claim about ICE being more violent than those they've deported.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/20 01:51 AM
1

No, it doesn't. Both of those ideologies are fascist and authoritarian in nature. Me opposing them and RIGHTFULLY lumping them together doesn't make me sound like a fascist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/20 01:38 AM
2

Again, I oppose Sharia Law and socialism. That's not fascism or apology. If anything, that makes each member of the squad a fascist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/20 01:31 AM
0

Lol. No they're not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/20 01:30 AM
5

Lol. If I'm stupid then my point should be easy to refute. Point stands: advocating for policies that will incentivize illegal immigration while opposing the force used to combat illegal immigration is definitely what someone who is pro open bordersprivilege. I'm sorry you are too stupid to understand that. Everyone has the right to be stupid sometimes but you abuse the privilege.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/20 01:30 AM
2

Opposing fascists like sharia law advocates and socialists doesn't make me a neo fascist. It makes me a liberal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/20 01:27 AM
1

Yes it is. So is advocating for policies to incentivize illegal immigration like free healthcare, free education, and no path to actual citizenship. She's re-open borders. Anyone who is disingenuous about illegal immigration being different from immigration. If you oppose the force that prevents the criminal activity (to include tackling human trafficking), while trying to incentivize illegal immigration, yes you are pro open borders. Yes, she's 100% pro open borders and at minimum, she is compl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/20 01:09 AM
2

The squad are four specific congresswomen: Rasheda Talib, Ilhan Omar, AOC, and Ariyanna Pressley. AOC is pro open borders, pro illegal immigration.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/20 11:59 PM
2

I don't doubt bias plays a major role in the bullshit that comes from their camp. I don't deny the fact their emotional and physical investments. I will not argue against your claim that they intentionally manipulate studies. With all these in mind, I'm just saying I think feminists are scientifically underdeveloped, and their studies and how they administer them definitely gives me the impression that it's more than bias and manipulation. I actually think the feminist camp is too stupid to unde…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/20 05:50 AM
2

Did I say anti-feminist links? That was poorly phrased. Let me put it a bit more clearly: I have a fuckton of links that are anti-feminist in nature. Some include feminist links of actually bigotry, hate, and violent tendencies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/20 05:35 AM
4

What I mean is that feminists seem to be oblivious to the importance of falsifiable data. They don't seem to have a grasp as to why it is important for your claims to be falsifiable. In my opinion, it stems from a fundamental misconception about how the scientific method operates. They pretty much take the John Money approach to science. Instead of forming a hypothesis, they do some such shit such as "If we do x, let's see what happens, as opposed to, "If we do x, then y will occur. If y doesn't…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/20 12:30 AM
10

The fact that feminist pseudoscience is unfalsifiable is an underrated problem, in my opinion. If something can only be proven true, but can't be proven false, why should I believe the claim if you're already doing it for me?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 10:18 PM
4

I've been collecting anti-feminism links in my bookmarks for holy shit I just realized 6 years. There are so many I need to sort into my folders, but I'd wager I have about 1000 to 1500 links saved, but twice that because I archived my links on Web Archive or Archive.is. Not just anti-feminism either, false rape allegations (I'm actually working on a project to identify cities with recurring false claims).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 09:51 PM
2

Most reasonable people can see that at bare minimum, feminism acts like a religion. Even just the reaction to criticism of feminism garners some nasty responses. I was on FB a couple of years ago and some atheist+ morons was affirming feminism as a movement for equality. Meanwhile, egalitarianism is just a euphemism for "men's rights." It wasn't long before the group got pretty nasty and began threatening to castrate and decapitate me. I posted a meme some years back that captioned an image of a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 09:45 PM
9

Cool! More links to save to my folder thanks, once again, to /u/Lady_Coraline2
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 09:40 PM
0

I didn't cite the Black Book of Communism. But don't let facts get in the way. Also, thanks to the Great Chinese Famine, I'm going to up my claim from 100M to about 125M. So, in other words, after doing more research, it seems I'm now even more against communism and the deaths you're downplaying are an even greater figure than cited by the Black Book you seem so gay for. Thanks, C0dey, you definitely showed me I'm right to condemn this ideology. I thought it was possible for me to see that the d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 04:56 PM
0

Doubling down? Okay, well continue refuting a source nobody cited or read while disregarding the multiple other sources that affirm ~100M.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 04:43 PM
0

Lol. Again with that source that I never cited or cared to cite, and that you never read, and the complete disregard for the various other sources that affirm a high kill count. Wait, unless you believe they're the only ones who have cited something like that. In which case, this makes you an actual fucking moron. Are you going to continue with your two-day long strawman fallacy? Because I don't know how many times you can prop up a caricature of my argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 04:22 PM
1

And again, you still go to that source I never cited and you never read. 😂😂😂😂😂 Remember, I posted a fact yesterday about the deaths under socialism between Russia and India. The number just between those two countries between 1917 and 1987 alone was enough to affirm the 100M figure is possible (this was the one where you essentially tried to deny socialism had any involvement despite no other economic ideology dominating each country). It's not like we don't have an idea as to how many people we…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 03:56 PM
0

No, I'm actually not. Are you going to keep making a fool of yourself? I'm sorry that historical facts contradict your conspiracy theory, but no, I never cited that group. I cited 100M as a result of researching the deaths that occurred under Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Piss, and a variety of other socialist leaders. And if I'm honest, I think 100M is a conservative estimate if you consider the other countries I listed. I did not attempt to inflate the Nazi casualties amongst the deaths of those und…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 03:45 PM
0

Says the one who thinks the deaths of Nazis should be remembered and associated with those killed by them. Actually, literally nowhere did I say that. Someone, however, did try to inflate the number of Nazis killed to try and say I was representing them as the majority of casualties. That wasn't you, though. Nowhere have I done anything to represent the Nazis as victims. I don't like socialists, so it makes no sense as to why Nazis would be excluded. Dumbfuck.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 02:57 PM
0

Again, you cited that book you didn't read. You can keep trying to tack that book to me. But historical facts will always contradict you. Deaths in all the countries I've listed, contradict your socialist ideals. Keep denying you're a socialist, but if you were downplaying the deaths of Holocaust victims, I'd call you a Nazi.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 02:40 PM
0

No, you just downplay, disregard, and deny the deaths of countless people. But remember, this was all so you could "win." Remember, I'll stick to the facts. 100M is the golden number. All you can do is pretend the number has been debunked. Yeah, you're definitely a socialist. If me opposing death and destruction at the hands of socialism, makes me a fucking lunatic then coming from you who defends the deaths of 100M people, that's a compliment. Keep riding the flimsy "Hurr durr the authors said …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 02:32 PM
0

Still waiting for you to deny and downplay the atrocities committed under socialism. I wonder if this is the extent if your retardation. Probably. It's funny watching you defend this ideology while claiming I haven't researched this, and your only source is debunking a book you haven't read yet. I've said it before, I'll say it again, socialists are fucking idiots.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 02:03 PM
5

Such an excellent comment that perfectly encapsulates the junk science in feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 02:01 PM
0

100M is historical fact, and no amount of denial can change that. Sorry, bootlicker. 😘 I'm neither a supporter now an advocate for socialism. Absolutely. You're objective, and smart and totally not shilling for an ideology that latches citizens into totalitarianism. Lol. You're totally not a supporter or advocate of socialism while using bunk sources to downplay the deaths of 100M you don't care about. Man, C0dey, you might very well be the dumbest person in this sub next to the menslibbers. Def…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 01:47 PM
0

Nope. I'm not moving any goalpost. Im maintaining the 100M death factual figure and I'm expanding to trap you into trying to explain away the authoritarian nature. You are either going to ignore this point, or you're going to dismiss it. It's honestly harder for you to try and explain the authoritarian nature of socialism away, but it will be fun watching you try. Mainly because socialists are stupid and easy to manipulate. The figure was not debunked, but I expect stupid people who think conjec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 12:47 AM
0

Because the authors didn't address the authoritarian nature of socialism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 12:38 AM
0

Still not acknowledgeling that socialism inevitably leads to authoritarianism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 11:47 PM
0

Lol. Right. Unhinged.a feminist shaming tactic that comes out when morons like you can't refute facts. The best part of this is there are zero examples socialism not diving into authoritarianism. Pretty pathetic watching you shill for dictators, but hey, every group has their useful idiots, and you fill the role nicely.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 07:59 PM
0

Keep defending an authoritarian ideology. If you can deny and dismiss the deaths of 100M people then I can dismiss your bogus sources that discount and downplay the authoritarian ideology. I don't know why you are still arguing. We agreed that you won. Isn't that what you wanted?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 07:48 PM
0

No, your source was full of shit and so are you for defending an authoritarian ideology. And we have millions upon millions if graves. 100M . Your sources were bullshit. I've already explained why 100M deaths. USSR, China, Ethiopia Venezuela, North Korea, Lithuania, Latvia, Cuba.... and several other places. You're defending a totalitarian ideology and you're literally too stupid to see it. You're an idiot BUT, we already agreed that you win, and I'll stick to the facts
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 07:40 PM
0

They actually didn't. What may or may not happen among an alternate universe is not proving me wrong. I am sorry that constitutes a strong argument for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 07:18 PM
0

I'm ignoring nonsense. Literally everything you posted was pure horseshit. Conjecture about what would have happened if the Nazis weren't killed, a strawman argument about people who remark on the 100M deaths are just Nazi sympathizers, and a bunch of crap. You can't seriously expect any same person to entertain such trash. Now, you deny that socialism was the factor behind the deaths under those regimes. Are you going to try and tell me that was actually capitalism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 07:18 PM
1

Do you deny those facts? Or you just deny it was socialism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 07:13 PM
0

Lol. I know you're delusional, and so I'll say this in small worda: saying that someone is wrong and that your right doesn't make them wrong and you right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 07:12 PM
1

Here, since you seem unable to read a simple question let me ask you again: Between 1917 and 1987, Vladimir Lenin, Josef Stalin and their successors murdered and were otherwise responsible for the deaths of 62 million of their own people. Between 1949 and 1987, China's communists, led by Mao Zedong and his successors, murdered and were otherwise responsible for the deaths of 76 million Chinese. Do you deny this fact? The claim that communism killed 94 million people during the 20th century, for …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 07:10 PM
1

Coward's retreat. Come on, man. For a guy who thinks he is so smart, you sure don't act like it. You certainly seem upset that you can't refute facts asserted by stupid old me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 07:08 PM
0

Between 1917 and 1987, Vladimir Lenin, Josef Stalin and their successors murdered and were otherwise responsible for the deaths of 62 million of their own people. Between 1949 and 1987, China's communists, led by Mao Zedong and his successors, murdered and were otherwise responsible for the deaths of 76 million Chinese. Do you deny this fact?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 07:05 PM
0

No I didn't. You inflated Nazi deaths like a Nazi apologist. Then said, if the faction that was destroyed wasn't destroyed, they would have destroyed more. Hurr durr. You're taking the coward's retreat now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 07:01 PM
1

You're incapable of having an intellectually honest debate. Then surely you should be able to make short work of me and convert me to the totalitarian ideology of socialism, or if not, perhaps some readers will see how dumb I am and how brilliant you are. You know, as brilliant as they see you now what with making shit argument and flinging mud everywhere. Come on. It will be fun.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 06:59 PM
0

Debate. If I'm really so wrong then this debate should be no problem for you. I'll even give you a handicap.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 06:56 PM
0

No you didn't. You posted a bunch of shit with nothing to say. Come on. You want sources? Let's do this. Socialism vs. CAPITALISM Let's compare. What are you afraid of? Are you afraid to "lose" a debate where socialism will be revealed as an authoritarian ideology and you were stupid enough to defend it? Come on, dude. If you're so certain that I'm full of shit then this debate should be no problem for a stunning intellectual such as yourself, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 06:52 PM
0

Says the guy who thinks Nazis killed in WWII are victims Not even a debate and you're already committing a strawman fallacy. Still the only rebuttal you have is "Hurr durr in another universe the nazis might have killed more people." I couldn't be stupid enough to make such an argument if I were braindead.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 06:51 PM
0

Lol. And you stick to downplaying the deaths of authoritarian ideologies. I'll stick with ideologies that don't lead to people drinking from shit-infested lakes. I've not defended a single authoritarian ideology. You however are now trying to inflate Nazi deaths under communism. Definitely something a Nazi apologist would do. Edit: since you seem too stupid to see why your revuttalbis bullshit, I'll point it out to you: If naziism kept that pace of 1.25 million people killed each year, it would …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 06:45 PM
1

I lost? Wait, so this is about winning and losing for you? Not even about the facts. Well shit, how about this? You can win, I'll stick to the facts. Scared?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 06:40 PM
-1

Your source was nonsense. Considering you are the one who cited the book and decided to refute a book I know damn well you haven't read. And you do this while standing on the graves of 100M people. Fine. I won't include the Nazi deaths. I'll take off like like 5M. 95M under communism lol. I've not defended a single authoritarian ideology. You, on the other hand, have not only defended it, but also downplayed atrocities committed by these regimes. But yeah, you disingenuously try and frame me as …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 06:20 PM
0

You being dismissive towards the deaths of 100M people as a result of YOUR ideology not unlike Holocaust denialists? You discount, deflect, and deny. Definition of a totalitarian bootlicker
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 06:07 PM
0

And I've already pointed out to you that your rebuttal was nothing shy of disingenuous and dismissive. For example, while you considered the famine as the cause of death, you didn't consider the cause of the famine. Spare me the holocaust denial tactics. You need to acknowledge the simple fact that 100M are dead, and people are eating dogs in Venezuela. Everywhere socialism has been tried, people have died under YOUR ideology (with no Capitalism to be found) and you're expecting me not to think …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 06:01 PM
0

Can't refute the fact that life for South Koreans under capitalism is better than life for North Koreans under socialism? Too bad. Capitalists think starving kids is acceptable and explains why they let the Irish die in the 1840s. Hahahaha! Definitely validated why it was wise for me to not entertain your Congo remarks. It was bullshit and shows you know nothing about capitalism. bootlicker No, I actually condemn socialism and communism. You defend it. Technically that makes YOU the bootlicker
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 05:38 PM
-1

The same South Koreans who are historically under a US-supported dictator? You're a damn fool. I should stop here, but I'm having fun... Yes, Sorth Koreans. The same South Koreans who don't live under socialist North Korea. The same South Korea where the locals are permitted to have cell phones by their government. The same South Korea where the population is better nourished than their neighbors to the North. Qualitybof life is better under capitalist South than socialist North. There you go, f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 05:24 PM
0

Majority of deaths weren't Nazi sympathizers. But I'm glad you sympathized enough with Nazis to try and represent them as the majority of deaths under communism and socialism. Good job covering for fascists, you dolt. 😎
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 05:14 PM
-2

Someone here clearly hasn't learned about mass incarceration in the United States. You know that it's called the new jim crow for a reason, right? Whataboutism. You mean doing what Barack Obama did? Which was? Be a useless leader of a country?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 05:12 PM
-1

And if you tallied up all of the people brutalized by capitalists it would far eclipse anything else. False. The South Koreans would tend to disagree with you. Lolwut Not sure what place nonsense words have in this discussion. Perhaps you can try a reasonable response like asking me to elaborate. Not try and pretend what I was absolutely absurd, that this was the best response you could come up with. Point stands.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 05:10 PM
1

Amazing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 02:29 PM
1

👍
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 02:15 PM
1

Okay. Bored now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 02:10 PM
1

And the copypasta. So let's run through your NPC programming: Encounter facts Register that you don't like facts Hurr durr use a dictionary Doesnt work Hurr durr ur stupid Doesn't work Hurr sure copypasta Thank you for proving why socialism is the flat earth of economic ideas.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 01:41 PM
2

You're gross.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 01:18 PM
1

Aw, what's the matter? No logical rebuttal? Lol. Is this the best you can do?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 01:13 PM
2

That's primarily the point I was delivering.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 01:11 PM
1

You should come up with an actual rebuttal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 01:09 PM
6

Question: how often do the mods delete stuff in this sub?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 04:53 AM
0

100M deaths, dude. Made the Nazis look like bitches. Nothing good comes from socialism and history agrees with that fact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 04:43 AM
-1

Bringing up an the US is a whataboutism, and your deflection from the atrocities committed under socialism is a whataboutism by your definition. No hypocrisy here. Besides, the economic system during enslavement wasn't capitalism. I'm sorry you are not able to understand why that is a false equivalence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 04:35 AM
0

Right-wing Zionism? Lol. Funny that you have no logical rebuttal and so your best course of action is to deploy unfalsifiable smears. Of course I'm not a leftist, I'ma liberal. If I were a leftist, I would make similar arguments to right wing Zionism. But hey, most stupid people can only take this route, and exceptionally stupid people tend to be unable to refute examples of anti-semitism except by saying "Hurr durr zionism!"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 04:31 AM
1

👍
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 02:28 AM
-1

Whataboutism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 02:27 AM
-7

Right. Well, have fun with that. I'll stick to not praising totalitarian regimes that murder and unlawfully imprison their citizens. You wouldn't expect me to accept your praising scientific advancements as a result of Nazi Germany, this is no different. These regimes killed people. I don't care if the trains ran on time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 01:53 AM
-6

Really? I'd say praising the transportation of the communist USSR was pretty disingenuous. "Oh, hey, they unlawfully imprison their citizens in gulags, but transportation system is totally praiseworthy." Pretty disingenuous from where I stand. Praising Fidel Fidel Castro's "literacy program," but never mind the thousands of Cubans who fled their homeland, and the citizens who could read the glass charges levied against them by the regime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 01:12 AM
-6

He's gotten rich off capitalism, while preaching socialism and praising communism. He aligns himself with anti-semites such as Rasheeda Talib, Ilhan Omar, and Linda Sarsour: an advocate for Sharia Law (a political ideology that could also stand to be more tolerant towards women and gays). He has flip flopped on immigration and border policy, he advocates for racist ideas like reparations for slavery and affirmative action. I hope he gets the nomination so I could watch him get absolutely devoure…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 01:03 AM
-11

It's no secret that I think Bernie is a con-artist and a literal POS. With that said, I can't fathom the audacity some women have to feel compelled enough to lecture men on how they choose to exercise their right despite not having to register for the draft. You can criticize the candidate, sure. Beyond that, you just need to leave it alone. My ex gf didn't want to tell me who she voted for in 2016, and that's her choice. If she did tell me, it wasn't my place to punish her for voting for a cand…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 12:00 AM
1

I think the best way to recognize prominent historical women, is to recognize their individual accomplishments individually throughout the year. Marie Curie died from long-term radiation exposure. Perhaps we can recognize her birthday as a significant day. Same with any other major female contributor.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/20 08:25 PM
1

There was an exchange between Morgan Freeman and some guy asking him about black history month. Freeman said he doesn't agree with relegating rich black history to one month, and that black history is American history. Pretty much the same idea. Women have made immeasurable contributions, and pushing them to a month is absurd.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/20 05:24 PM
1

I've never written a Reddit bot before. Doesn't seem too difficult. Kind of been wanting to. Mind if I give it a try?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/20 05:16 PM
1

I honestly don't give two shits about that. I don't need to get my criticism of 45 fron T_D, or even Reddit for that matter. I can't understand why Reddit insists that everyone be spoon fed second-hand information about people, places, scientific fact, or whatever. Even if they delete criticisms of 45, why should they be held to a higher standard when Obama supporters turn the other cheek in the face of criticism? Even if they delete the criticism, who gives a shit? I've never found a group of p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/20 10:38 AM
12

A dangerous fallacy? It's the word, dangerous there that leads me to believe what I'm about to read is utter hogwash. I will say, the feminists are really good with this little verbal jab tactic. However, it's getting old and backfiring on them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/20 06:33 PM
1

Yeah, I'm in the same boat about marriage. Little hang-ups like this automatically disqualify us from compatibility with a large segment of the dating market.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 07:49 PM
14

I've seen the mods act like complete shitheads. I have not, however, seen the mod of a subreddit supposedly devoted to men's issues, utterly shut down a male victim of rape. I don't think it should surprise me, but I'd be lying if I said it didn't. Mainly because I didn't think anyone could be so cruel towards a rape victim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 04:33 PM
17

Man... piece of shit. Definitely not a place for men to go seek help with men's issues. Next time I see the sub get a nice plug, I'll be sure to include this bit of information in the comments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 03:59 PM
10

Now this is some information that I needed to hear. Go on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 03:47 PM
5

There's that old adage about cutting out a man's tongue doesn't prove him a liar, but there's fear of what he might say.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 07:02 AM
16

What the fuck? You're way less controversial in your views and opinions than I am and you're the one who gets banned? You're way less of an asshole than I am too. Lol. Fuck Reddit. Just subbed to your YouTube channel on principle.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 05:11 AM
14

Fucking a! This is what I tell my friends. Just go talk to her, bro! If she tells you to fuck off, it's an accomplishment. I'll add this: it's better to be rejected by a 10 than it is to be rejected by five 2s.
/r/askTRP04/03/20 04:29 AM
2

Yeah, I get you. I'm an atheist and dated a catholic for years. So it honestly isn't outside the realm of possibility that I can find a feminist woman who rocks my world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 01:02 AM
5

I'd love to see him post this thread to that subreddit he referenced, and watch as the subscribers turn on him
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 12:40 AM
1

Question: is it impossible for someone who is not a feminist (not even and anti-feminist like myself) to have the share values with you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 12:38 AM
6

I know. Fucking guy won't even touch when I tell him there are example of feminists opposing egalitarianism. Doing so would mean I absolutely demolish his points.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 12:19 AM
4

It's absurd.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 12:17 AM
3

So it looks like I wasn't the only one having to deal with that guy's idiocy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 12:15 AM
3

I did not say that either. Reading is hard for you, isn't it?Why should I support an ideology that opposes egalitarianism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 10:40 PM
4

Nope, I'm not saying that. Try again. We do have a word. It's called egalitarianism. It's more inclusive than feminism and without the supremacy. You should try it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 10:29 PM
2

No, it's a stupid fucking question that I'm not going to waste my time answering because it would never fucking happen. So why should I support a religion that has repeatedly opposed egalitarianism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 10:19 PM
2

so you wouldn’t fight for women’s rights? Nope. Women already have about 4 dozen more rights, privileges, accessibility to exclusive resources, and benefits not extended to men. say someone proposed a bill that would revoke women’s rights to vote, would you support or protest that? Lol. This is an absurd question Right because this would be a very politically savvy move to make. "Hurr durr, I'm going to propose a bill that revokes the right to vote for the majority of the voterbase?" With how ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 10:09 PM
1

No matter how many times you commit the fallacy, it still doesn't undermine the fact that feminism acts in ways which betray the words. You're willing to entertain non dictionary definitions of feminism of equality, but you're still unwilling to entertain real-world examples of feminist supremacy. Egalitarians don't have a history of opposing egalitarian measures like feminists do. You can keep pretending feminism is pro-equality, but again, we have historical facts which directly refute that cl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 09:53 PM
1

Yeah, I see where you're coming from. I just avoid it altogether. It sucks too, because I've made friends with some gorgeous single moms.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 08:42 PM
2

Lol. Okay. I'll leave you to this denial.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 08:29 PM
3

just let me know when ur definition makes it into the dictionary Using a dictionary’s limited definition of a term as evidence that term cannot have another meaning, expanded meaning, or even conflicting meaning. This is a fallacy because dictionaries don’t reason; they simply are a reflection of an abbreviated version of the current accepted usage of a term, as determined by argumentation and eventual acceptance. In short, dictionaries tell you what a word meant, according to the authors, at th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 08:26 PM
0

You mean nowhere? No, I mean China, North Korea, Venezuela, Ethiopia, Latvia, USSR, Lithuania, and a variety of other countries.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 08:21 PM
0

Capitalism has raised more people out of poverty than socialism and communism. Everywhere that communism and socialism has been implemented has resulted in destruction. Socialist medicine is not the same as a socialist economy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 08:02 PM
3

what other word is there for someone who believes in and advocates for equality of the sexes Egalitarian. Feminism is not about equality. It never has been, it never will be. “equality of the sexes” doesn’t really work if one sex is above the other, does it? Agreed. Which is why it's deceptive to refer to feminism as an equality movement. It's a supremacy movement. it’s funny to see you call it a religion and then watch as you angrily rant about feminism, almost with a disgusted tone. reminds me…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 07:55 PM
2

Egalitarian makes me seem blind? No, that's feminism. Sort of how you convenitlently turn the other cheek to all the anti-egalitarian practices of your religion? Nope, I'm an egalitarian. Not a supremacist. Feminism is a supremacy movement. It always has been, it always will be. Don't preach to egalitarians about equality if you're preaching a supremacy ideology. be a feminist inspiration for all the men and women in your life, teach them the way. No thanks. Been an atheist for a long time now, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 07:20 PM
1

What's in my head: will this guy provide evidence? Come on, I have alimony payments to make! Oof.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 04:49 PM
1

So, how is this going to go down in your head later? "Some guy on Reddit asked me for evidence for my claim, and instead of posting evidence, I posted rubbish in response."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 04:44 PM
1

Just saying. You're the one who tried to draw a distinction between the groups. It's on you to prove the claim. "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence." You haven't presented me with evidence. So why should I believe you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 04:39 PM
1

Still waiting on historical facts from you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 04:35 PM
1

Still waiting on historical facts from you. Hasn't happened yet. Likely won't since you're just here to pretend you know what you're talking about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 04:29 PM
7

if you believe in equality between sexes you are a feminist, it's really that simple Well, considering that feminism is 99% a supremacy movement, your attempt to get people to conform to your religion sort of falls flat on its face. If feminism was really about equality, then I should be able to look through feminism's history and find zero accounts of the followers advocating against egalitarian measures. Unfortunately for you, history is littered with examples of feminism displaying supremacy …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 04:27 PM
1

I love it. You come to the thread trying to spread historical inaccuracies. The problem though, in your eyes, is me not willing to accept the bullshit you're attempting to spew, and instead of you, I'm also stupid. How convenient This is literally the last thread you're hanging from, richionne. But hey, if you can't get anyone to believe your lies, calling me stupid and painting me as "doubling down" definitely shows everyone the Dixiecrats and Democrats were different.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 04:22 PM
1

Lol. No gymnastics. Just not partaking in your gymnastics of trying to split hairs between Dixiecrats and Democrats. I'm sorry I know more about the racism of your party than you do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 04:16 PM
2

It's ironic that this title is saying that capitalism pushes people to political extremes when it is the far left socialists who are going out and beating the shit out of people with blunt objects. This is what propaganda looks like. Capitalism has raised more people out of poverty than socialism or communism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 04:14 PM
2

Definitely do admire those astounding traits shining through. A woman who can carry her own weight is a major plus.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 04:11 PM
5

You definitely picked up on the point behind my policy, pretty quick. I'm cool with kids, but I get attached. Kids seem to be cool with me, but they also get attached. Should mother and I break up, I don't want to deal with that, and I'm certain neither do kids.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 04:09 PM
4

I definitely appreciate you adding diversity to the thread. It's been a pretty mixed bag. Some say yes, some say no, some say maybe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 04:06 PM
1

If not tolerating bullshit or dishonest shilling by racist apologists makes me dumb, then coming from you, it's a compliment. Sorry that your bullshit historical revisionism didn't get a chance to deceive people. Maybe you can find someone who is ignorant to the facts and you can convince them. Won't happen here, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 04:04 PM
6

I wouldn't date a Nazi either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 02:32 AM
6

I beg to differ. I have a very strict no dating single mothers policy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 01:34 AM
1

Bullshit. I've seen this argument setup by hundreds of you racist shills. Again, miss me with that bullshit. You are going to draw a distinction between Dixiecrats who started the KKK, and the Democrats who ACTUALLY started the KKK. Fuck off. We've seen you shills spread enough historical revisionism and utter crap.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/20 10:36 PM
1

I'm well-aware of the attempted bait-and-switch you're attempting. Miss me with that bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/20 10:31 PM
3

Right. We've all heard it before. Once upon time the bad guys were the good guys, and the good guys were the bad guys. And one day, the both sides shook hands and through power of piddle magic one party said, "Duh, we'll be da racist party." And the other party just absolved themselves of creating the KKK by saying, "Duh, we no racist no more." My ass the party is nothing like it was back then. They still use the black community for their own gain, and have shown to be quite apathetic to black i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/20 06:52 PM
3

Careful, bro. Some Democrats cannot reconcile historical fact with their support for the most racist political party in history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/20 05:42 PM
4

Since they were told they have to give up their slaves? I thought it was when they were told that blacks were to be given the right to vote. Oh wait. I thought it was when they superficially bribed blacks to vote Democrat with the New Deal. Oh wait. I thought it was when they didn't deliver on the promises made to black Americans of they voted Democrat. Oh wait. I thought it was when they threw thousands of Japanese Americans into internment camps. Oh wait. I thought it was their opposition to c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/20 05:37 PM
7

Why not? Because feminists hate men and don't give two shits about boys. They don't care how it would benefit students, they care about validating their own bigotry. The world would legit be a better place if feminism never existed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/20 05:28 PM
2

Pass. The thumbnail says decline in religion. It could be a minor factor.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/20 05:54 AM
1

And gun makers don't know that their products will end up killing people? Well, considering that gun murders have been slashed in half since the 90s and gun ownership rates have increased by about that same rate in that same time, you can't really argue that more guns cause more gun violence. So your gun make analogy falls short. It's no secret that introducing heroin to a neighborhood might cause problems. If the drugs compel people to commit violent, theft, and property crimes, then it doesn't…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/20 01:09 AM
1

Knowingly damaging communities with meth definitely constitutes drug crimes. Drug crimes do occur. People are killed over drugs everyday. Also, it's kind of illegal to sell drugs like heroin.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 11:46 PM
2

Sure. I read a lot about this matter, and from what I can tell this article provides a pretty good timeline of events, to include articles as they were published. Archived Link. Pretty solid place to start. If you scroll down to Aug 13, 2013, that article gave some details. The grand jury testimony is also listed in this link.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 11:42 PM
2

Right. So because it's cheaper then that's definitely a good argument. Well then in that case, it's cheaper for us if we do nothing. So it's better for us to not give them heroin and not take them to jail. I win. /s Just because it's cheaper to give them heroin than it is to send them to jail, doesn't mean it's an appropriate response. If you want to help curb addiction, the worst thing you can do is Fund it through the taxpayers. There's a reason that fighting fire with fire is considered a stu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 12:59 AM
1

Right, and take into account the drug usage as well. Especially if this is a recurring problem. Also don't forget to account for punishing dealers? They knowingly give these substances to these people knowing they may commit crimes to get their fix. So there's that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 09:48 PM
1

Not just violence, but crimes in general. That includes property crimes as well. If someone breaks into someone's car to steal their car stereo to score some cash for their drug fix, that would be associated with a drug crime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 09:36 PM
1

That's fine if you want to bring the alcohol prohibition argument into the discussion, but the fact remains that alcohol doesn't have the same effects on the body as say meth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 07:04 PM
1

Not necessarily. I say if the drug tends to play a factor in the motive for why people commit crimes, then the drug doesn't need to be decriminalized.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 06:23 PM
4

With most drugs, the best approach is to treat it like a public health issue, not a criminal issue (unless a crime is committed). Decriminalizing drugs isn't going to combat drug addiction, and any fucking idiot who argues that it will is absolutely wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 05:24 PM
2

If this is the truly the logic behind decriminalizing drugs, then it might be one of the dumbest rationalizations I've encountered. "Here, we're going to enable your drug habit on the taxpayer dime. However, we're not going to discourage you from usage unless you're ready. Until you're ready, you can just keep coming here to get high until you want to get your mind right." I can tell you that the idiots that came up with such an idea have NEVER dealt with methheads.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 05:20 PM
2

Tulsi is my preferred choice for Democrats.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/20 02:33 AM
2

Out of who?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/20 01:45 AM
2

No, they're using your logic against you. You're perfectly okay with defending Warren the way you have, but if someone acted similarly about Trump, they'd be labeled a Trump apologist, perhaps by you. Either way, your defense for Warren's behavior is absurd. I can't believe you're too obtuse to see that. I'm not talking about hate or bigotry either. I'm talking about a rich white woman exploiting privileges afforded to a minority demographic to further her own professional development. Especiall…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/20 01:44 AM
1

No, because I'm not delusional enough to support a con-artist who preaches socialism and praises communism, while simultaneously getting rich off of capitalism. Bernie is actually the most likely candidate for political corruption.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/20 01:02 AM
4

The funny part about them calling you a white supremacist is that they never actually challenge your points. If you really were a white supremacist, then it stands to reason that a debate against a white supremacist should result in a slamdunk. Problem is, calling people these names is a precise indicator that they're too stupid to refute what you or any white supremacist has to say. In other words, SJWs are dumber than white supremacists
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/20 11:19 PM
2

Fucking horrible. Chances are there is a student more deserving of such recognition. Warren takes that away and the outrage of "not enough representation," "whitewashing," or "oppression" is nowhere to be heard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/20 11:14 PM
2

I think you misunderstood what that redditor was doing. They took YOUR logic and used it against you. If someone was making the statements about President Trump, similar to your remarks on Warren, you would be referring to them as a Trump apologist. Same with Hitler. Basically, they're using your logic against you and you're squirming to understand the fuckery you've managed to rope yourself into.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/20 11:11 PM
1

Her opinions mean fuck-all to me. She's a lying con-artist. That is objectively true, and her opinions ironically have zero impact on this observation. I wish I could exploit minority status and get into prestigious institutions, and not have to apologize for it until after I get caught. The problem is, I have a conscience. She apologized only after she reaped the benefits and only apologized once she was caught. She's full of shit, and so are you for defending her bullshit. What she did was fuc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/20 11:06 PM
3

Fine. Then by this logic, I grew up in a predominantly black neighborhood. Since I'm a human, and humans emerged from Africa, I request that people acknowledge me as a black male and allow me to get into Harvard. This woman is a con-artist and here you are enabling her scheme. She knew what she was going, so yes it is her fault.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/20 05:35 PM
21

If height jokes are fair game, then so is making fun of her "Native American heritage."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/20 02:23 AM
12

Whether you refer to them as Bernie Bros, or Bernie Bums, it's clear the misandry either remarks on some issue faced by men in some dismissive fashion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/20 10:30 PM
6

Definitely Dr. Farrell. I don't even know how feminists can refer to him as full-time men's activist, when the fact of the matter is: he's started dozens upon dozens of men's and women's group.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/20 05:11 PM
8

You know, this is a good idea: creating a wiki of prominent left-wing male advocates and profile theorists stances, work, publications. You're definitely on to something, /u/Oncefa2.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/20 04:38 PM
7

In my opinion, we should write a vote bot to post Martin Fiebert's bibliography whenever a post is made referencing male victims of DV.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/20 12:57 AM
2

Fuck, dude. My sincerest condolences. I wish I knew what to say to help you retrieve your will to live, but my inbox is open if you want to vent. All the best, dude!
/r/askTRP17/02/20 08:21 PM
0

Lol. All you did was illustrate that you don't even understand what you're referring too. Well, I guess you'll never be able to substantiate this claim until you sit your stupid lazy socialist ass down and read them. Again, until that time comes fuck off. And spare me whatever fallacy you're about to type into your device. Read these books, then you can have a discussion about them. If you want to continue to look foolish by trying to discuss matters covered in books you haven't read, go for it.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/20 06:35 PM
1

Lol. Right. Well, when you actually read the books, you can contribute. Until then, kindly fuck off.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/20 12:14 PM
5

It wouldn't hurt to read their works. Do me a solid, and hook me up with names, dates, specific works or publications you think would be helpful. All the best.
/r/askTRP15/02/20 10:10 PM
10

Because I hate religion, and seen the horrors of religion. So, from my mind, you had to be foolish to flock to such ideas. I view religion as sets of values that implant aspects of gynocentricism into otherwise good men. With that said, those were views I held two years ago. I don't hold as black and white of a view towards religion as I once did. I evolved from the "opiate of the masses" viewpoint because I just felt there was more nuance to that assessment after having spent more time in my co…
/r/askTRP15/02/20 07:25 PM
19

Wow. Now I actually feel bad for referring to his conversion to Christianity as "losing his mind." That was a surprisingly beautiful thing to say.
/r/askTRP15/02/20 06:29 PM
3

Wait, his sister died? Fuck... I didn't know that. It explains him losing his mind and converting to Christianity. Oh well, his* choice.
/r/askTRP15/02/20 05:54 PM
1

Alright. 1.) Basic Economics: A Common Sense Guide to the Economy 2.) Economic Facts and Fallacies 3.) Economics in One Lesson. I found out a few days ago about another book that was published this past year that expands on the works written by Henry Hazlett. Openstax has free textbooks that cover economics, and you find them on the website. Good textbooks too. I've also read Freakanomics & Think Like a Freak; I recommend checking out How Not to be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking to ch…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/20 11:28 AM
2

Yeah, well you do know the socialist economy collapsed in Venezuela right? You know, the place where people are eating dogs and zoo animals. 2/3 of Russians miss the Soviet? Bwahahahahahaha yeah, totally and 2/3 of Jews miss Nazi Germany and concentration camps.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/20 07:57 AM
2

Me, historians, facts, data... I mean how many countries does this ideology have to fail before you say, "Hurr durr we shud try something different." There's nothing good that comes from socialism. Venezuela was proof of that, not just because it showed socialism to be a shitty ideology, but because despite having an abundant proven oil reserve, the leadership managed to collapse that economy. Socialism has killed millions from Russia, North Korea, Afghanistan, Ethiopia, and an abundance of othe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/20 06:59 AM
2

Right. And you're only shilling for economic ideologues that have been responsible for upwards of 100M deaths over the course of less than 100 years. Edit: what Marx gets wrong is pretty much what most sociologists do: he oversimplifies the matters. He does a real good job of selling the reader the idea that a consensual agreement with an employer is actually exploitation. He's full of shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/20 06:29 AM
2

Well, perhaps devote more time to reading and understanding economics than trying to shill for fascist ideologies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/20 06:08 AM
1

Requested a vasectomy a few years back. Doctors said no because if you're under 30, never had kids, and risk for suicide, then they deny you. At least, that's my experience with the VA. So this woman doesn't know what she's talking about.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/20 06:01 AM
1

So, let me guess: it's easier for you to come up with a worse insult than my 8-year-old nephew could muster, than it is to actually read an econ book? Cute.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/20 05:45 AM
6

Trump supporter? Lol. Might want to avoid the blind labeling. Not very left wing male advocatey of you to call into question about why I participate in subreddits, based on who I may or may not vote for. I watched Paul Elam slip into a similar trap against a leftist male who disagreed with him politically. All of a sudden, Mr. Elam was all about a double standard for those who vote left. It's fine to call into question why I may vote the way I vote. Also, I post on T_D because I'm an adult, I ca…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/20 05:44 AM
1

Lol. It takes a great deal of delusion to believe that capitalism got better because of socialism. You need to read some economics books.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/20 05:00 AM
3

Says who? Are you the arbiter of ideals?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/20 04:59 AM
4

No capitalism is exactly the problem. Right. The economic system that has lifted more people out of poverty than socialism or communism ever could and has, is the problem. The only people who have an interest in the abolition of capitalism : economic illiterates.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/20 11:24 PM
3

Well, because to sell the idea of your religion, you need to have as many bad guys as possible. When patriarchy fails, the next best one is capitalism. Capitalism is just another villain for the feminist ideology to sell as against you, and why you need sanctuary with them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/20 09:35 PM
3

Wow. The blatant misogyny displayed: "Did he hypnotize her?" No, dumbfuck, he provides her and their children with a place to live a comfortable lifestyle, and she's contributing to the relationship and the household in more ways than dying her unshaven armpit hairs pink and neon green. I'd love to imagine what would be the reaction if Trump made the exact same remarks about a stay-at-home mother. This clip has managed to reaffirm the sentiments I've been saying for years: feminism hates masculi…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/20 08:52 PM
9

Every now and then, we get a post that perfectly encapsulates the pussy pass phenomenon. This is such a post. Unlike other posts, where there's grey area of whether or not this is a pussy pass, it's not the case here. Unfortunately, I don't think her career is going to be even at all impacted. Hope Solo assaulted a minor, spit on police, and acted like an overall shithead and she was allowed to continue her soccer career. Anyone who thinks that her career is over, I'm sorry to burst your bubble.…
/r/PussyPass07/02/20 08:45 PM
5

My favorite part of this story is where this incident t occurred: not just California, but goddamn San Diego, CA. San Diego, CA where a lot of these people would consider the sanctuary of progressivism, this incident of sexual profiling occurred. My experience from my encounter with people from SD, they possess this inflated sense of self-importance and intelligence. Take notes, people, just because you live in an urban metropolis, doesn't make you more intelligent or not a bigot in some capacit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/20 08:19 PM
2

What? Painting our nails eradicates toxic masculinity and domestic violence? How long have you been sitting on this information?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/20 07:40 AM
12

Now hold on a second! I bet menslib would totally not consider this outrage porn if the roles were reversed and it was Johnny beating Amber and saying this bullshit to her. Oh wait, that's right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/20 11:11 PM
2

Tim Pool is the best liberal journalist. He's a self-made success despite being a high school drop out. He's a fine example of the American dream.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/20 06:22 AM
1

Does he ever challenge any of the right-wing claims made by his guests? No, because that's not his interview format. Does he even have any ideas of his own? Yes, but an interview should be where he's getting the perspectives of his guests, not trying to edge in his opinion where ever he can.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/20 06:21 AM
7

But if women were in charge, there would be no war.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/02/20 07:57 PM
1

Not really. I'm just citing that I'm against child support because it's absurd to believe that one adult is entitled to another adult's money. You argue that a child has entitlement to the parent's money, but we both know that's not true either. Sorry, but there needs to be a rational arguments you can give for why wage slavery needs to be legal. There are zero cases where I would argue that a child is better off with money vs. actual parenting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/20 04:40 PM
2

Absurd is believing an adult is entitled to another adult's money. Absurd is replacing parenting time with money. Absurd is having government dictate how we raise children. So, abortion is a sound parallel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/20 10:47 PM
1

I disagree. you don't want 50/50 custody, I think you should be compelled to pay child support. So because time isn't 50/50 then therefore the time should be replaced with money? No. Absurd. They should be allowed to not pay. I agree they're obligated to care for the kid, but if they choose not to, that's their choice too. Child support is a multi-million-dollar scam. The two parents in your scenario do not need courts to decide what the child needs. That's the parent's job. The courts don't dec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/20 09:26 PM
0

I don't support it at all. As long as abortion is legal, then I support nobody ever having to pay child support. Child support should be rare, but it isn't. If abortion is legal to provide women with no consequences for having sex, then this is the appropriate stance for me to take as an egalitarian. If a woman is allowed to have an abortion, a man should be allowed to walk away from parenthood, no questions asked. Child support is an absurd practice that reduces a child's parent to a walking AT…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/20 05:31 PM
13

This is precisely why I'm all for abolishing child support altogether. As Warren says, "Dad's time trumps dad's dime." A child can get $10K/month, and still turn out to be a shithead. This post, though. $380/week and these are the shoes the kid ends up with? I love watching examples of child support failure, as if how much money you pay is an indication of being a good parent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/20 04:58 PM
1

You have my sympathies. I hope one day that your misandry fades and you can find a man who loves and respects you. Only when you aren't such a sexist, will you be able to find love.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 11:47 PM
1

Hahahaha!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 11:45 PM
7

This is a good thing. We now get to see what a feminist dominated society looks like, how it operates, and how it treats men and boys. When this inevitably fails, we can use it as a Prime example of feminism being a fascist ideology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/20 11:32 PM
1

I only have Reddit and Snapchat for my social media. So, I'm glad I can avoid stupid remarks like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/20 12:57 AM
2

"Women are more benevolent when they commit suicide because there isn't a huge mess to clean up afterwards." Interesting. I've not had this come up in conversation, but I'll laugh if it ever does.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/20 12:48 AM
2

I chose war, because war casualties argument. Men are the disproportionate and overwhelming majority of war casualties. Dead and PTSD we agree are two separate issues, and we rarely compare PTSD with having your life taken from you. I can appreciate the humanity in preventing those who attempt suicide. However, the I take issue with deflecting a severe male issue to shift focus on a not-quite-as-severe female issue. It relays callousness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/20 11:43 PM
3

Not unreasonable at all, but there's a lot to be said if the response to the topic of men disproportionately killing themselves, being that women attempt it more frequently. It fascinates me watching feminists try to paint the suicide issue with women, as being worse than what men are facing. Hillary Clinton once said women were the primary victims of war, because they still get to live while the men who died by slaughter were merely a catalyst for women's status as the primary victims. It's not…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/20 10:12 PM
5

Lol! Totally the toxic fragile femininity. But feminists don't hate men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/20 06:18 PM
10

It's absolute absurdity for feminists to try and compare the living with the dead. The difference between an attempted suicide and a successful suicide: state of living. "Men commit suicide more often, but women attempt suicide more often." Imagine being so callous towards men, that when someone points out the fact that men kill themselves at a higher rate than women, you have the audacity to counter argue that men don't attempt to kill themselves more often than women. Most of us here think it'…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/20 05:02 PM
5

Lol! All too often do we see the key points in these false accusations. "They didn't think it was bad at the time," "They had sex multiple times between [specific dates]," using other allegations to convince these women to file charges. And, as usual, the accused has his name, reputation, and opportunities squashed by the media. Meanwhile, the accusers are provided with anonymity and shielded from responsibility. When Raiders CB Gareon Conley had his conviction thrown out, it was revealed that h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/20 11:36 PM
1

Appeal to dictionary definition fallacy is a thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/20 04:34 AM
-2

"Here's How Bernie Can STILL Win..."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/20 07:42 PM
3

I don't think supremacy are good ideas.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/20 04:59 AM
3

Right. Well, I'll leave you to your delusions that feminism is not rooted in supremacy and misandry, and something about police in Georgia never being racist. Your nonsense of white privilege is complete hogwash because you empathize with specific groups, but you damn near reject everything else. But hey, go ahead and continue pretending you're here for thoughtful dialogue on your stances if you're using cowardly expressions such as "agree to disagree" or resorting to vague sarcastic comments th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/20 11:08 PM
3

Sure, but the presumption that the so-called privilege is based on race is 100% absurd.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/20 10:59 PM
10

Well, we believe in equality. Can't speak for all feminists, but feminism itself is rooted in supremacy and misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/20 10:37 PM
5

I think it would benefit your discussion if you read this statement again, made by /u/Forgetaboutthelonely But the assumption that I'm privileged has made a lot of help unavailable for me. This is important for you to read again because it cuts to the core issue of the problem with the nature of assuming privilege. The issue being that judging by his appearance, believers of privilege, perceive the accused to be the beneficiary of some illicit privilege (unearned advantage) based on their skin c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/20 10:25 PM
2

hasn't rescued me from poverty, depression, mistreatment, abuse, or anything like that. Good on you for rising above.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/20 10:08 PM
2

Usually by pointing out that if I'm in fact right-wing, and that calling me such being the best rebuttal to my point, doesn't exactly scream rational. If they call you right-wing, it's safe to say the person has no problem resorting to ad hominem fallacies, and essentially that's all they have. When this happens, your best bet it is to mock and ridicule the individual for having such a weak counterargument against right-wingers. Where you sit on the political spectrum doesn't matter. What matter…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/20 05:20 PM
6

Check if your skin is clammy, get some water, and turn on Gargoyles to snap you out of it.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 04:08 PM
0

I don't take anyone who uses the word, Islamophobe seriously. There's a pretty good chance that the user of the term has never been to any Islamic state, or read the Qur'an and Hadith. Another reason, is you can look inside of the DSM5 or DSM3 and you won't find a single mention of Islamophobia. Personally, I think what happened was, some radical Muslim saw the word homophobia used as an unfalsifiable smear and the Supreme Court rule in favor of marriage equality. From this, they likely realized…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/20 02:53 PM
2

I was one of those absurdly arrogant "New Atheists" but that changed when I watched some real asshole behavior from some of them. The big one that stands out: a guy from a pretty large atheist FB page went to go watch his nieces and nephews in a Christmas play. I thought there was nothing wrong with being a supportive uncle. Imagine my surprise when this lunatic anti-christ woman commented that the dude supports child indoctrination. I specifically remember commenting, "You're joking, right?" Sh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/20 02:42 PM
2

Oh yeah, I have a good friend who's a devout Christian. He and I get along great and honestly, I'm glad he has such a profound passion. We met when I was taking one of my final 2 humanities courses, a history course. First day he walked up to me and asked what happened to my hand (I broke it on someone's face when they physically attacked me on the bus - boy, I felt foolish). He asked if he could take a moment to pray for me. I thought it was a thoughtful display of empathy. I think people like …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/20 02:21 PM
3

Look into the Tender Years Doctrine. At bare minimum, it's considered. You should assess the parental alienation rate of both mother and father. Black Americans also have over a single motherhood rate. I'd also look at how child support is distributed by sex (do mothers receive more than fathers or vice versa). I'd also consider looking at suicides with a microscope because you will find parents who committed suicide over not being able to see their children.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/19 02:05 AM
0

Cenk was acting like a jackass. No shit she was savage with him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/19 06:10 AM
3

Sometimes an interview can be hard-pressed, others not so much. The job isn't to challenge ideas all the time, sometimes it's just to get answers. How about requesting she get him to have a discussion with Daryl Davis?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/19 11:34 PM
5

Because interviews are to be had. I've seen very controversial public figures get interviewed and end up shooting themselves in the foot. Like I said on my other comment: I get not liking their views, but I don't get trying to suppress such horrible viewpoints. Honestly, she does a greater service by letting these people speak their mind so we know just how fucking batshit insane they are. This is also coming from someone who is far from a fan of her.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/19 10:13 PM
3

This is a valid question.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/19 10:10 PM
15

I will never understand why interviewing is absurdly conflated with "giving a platform to." She did an interview. Period. Misrepresenting it as giving them a platform is about as obtuse as you can get. Let her do the interview, ask some questions, and get some answers. Framing it as "giving them a platform" is about the dumbest thing you can do. Don't like their views? Fine. However, if you want these scum to continue to being able to frame themselves as "misunderstood" then let's take your appr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/19 10:09 PM
2

Moot? Alright.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/19 08:52 PM
3

Except that the matter of CEOs and politicians being predominantly male isn't a fair interpretation of statistics. They focus on the top 1% of men as representative of all men. All of these figures addressed are representative of where the majority of the male demographic reside. Feel free to expand on the topic, but if you are going to address the CEOs of companies, you should consider the industry and the primary target market. If you're going to consider politicians, you can't neglect the fac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/19 06:19 PM
4

Let's address the CEO ratio: Yes, men are CEOs more frequently than women. However, cherrypicking CEOs is an absurd way to address inequality between men and women. If we are to examine men and women through the occupational lens, then we need to examine the entirety of the occupational lens. That's where we include dangerous job, unemployment, incarceration, and homelessness. Elected officials on the other hand is a different story. Elected officials are appointed to their positions through ele…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/19 02:46 PM
1

Pretty much.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/19 05:18 PM
1

Advice for those who live in NY and California: get consent via text message or written. Only then will you have a chance to defend yourself in court when the woman inevitably decides to falsely accuse you of rape.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/19 10:17 PM
7

Stopped reading when anti feminism was framed to only angry men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/19 10:12 PM
1

Nope, it's he's anti Semitic because he aligns himself with anti Semites.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/19 04:23 PM
4

Damn good reply. I don't think I am committing a strawman. Here's why: the very basis of feminism is misandry. When men do great things, these actions are downplayed. When women do great things, they're rightfully recognized. When men do bad things, they're given an abundant exposure and you see arguments about where the good men have gone and why masculinity is go blame. When women do bad things, there's a lot of cricket chirping. The only time they listen to the male perspective on masculinity…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/19 05:26 AM
2

Hillary would have been better than Trump? I disagree. She was a terrible Secretary of State, so I have a tough time believing she would have been better than Trump as President.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/19 12:14 AM
10

I've seen this argument. It's thinly-veiled misandry, and nothing more. Feminists hate when men are good, strong, and honorable. They prefer men to be toxic, evil, and acting in accordance with the demonic portrayal they always warn everyone about. When men are acting honorable, the best they can do is downplay it. Men who act in accordance with their demonizing narrative are what feminists prefer so they can use those men as representative of all men. Male feminists, or pets, refer to themselve…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/19 10:35 PM
1

Obama is better than Trump? I disagree. Obama was a terrible President, and in my opinion, the worst we've ever had.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/19 09:01 PM
1

Obama got a lot of passes when he was in office. Nice to see people finally calling him out as yet another full of shit politician. To be fair, though, he was an incredible public speaker. However, he has shown to be yet another corrupt shill who is as traditional as the cuckservatives he criticized. Easily one of the worst Presidents, in my opinion. Campaigned on change, hope, and progress and failed to deliver jackshit in his promises.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/19 01:16 AM
3

Jesus Christ, that article . . . I don't even know what to say. The only unsurprising thing about it, is that it took place in California.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/19 08:48 PM
3

Seriously. Loss of valuable time, emotional distress, loss of income, court and legal fees he should not have had to pay to begin with, attorney costs. Yeah, he deserves to absolutely own the court system.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/19 08:09 PM
3

It's always an excellent point to discuss rates. The issue with rates are the ranges. The false rape accusation rate is estimated to be as low as 2% and as high as 40% (Eugene Kanin study). The question remains if the actual rate is closer to 2% or 40%. 10% could still be a high figure, but you bring to light the importance of nuance in calculating these statistics. There seems to be a quadrant in terms of paternity: fathers who are the biological father and are certain of the fact; fathers who …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/19 08:08 PM
1

Right. Well, I'll leave you to your delusions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/19 04:42 PM
1

Lol. Again with the propaganda trope. Congratulations. You've officially done nothing productive in this discussion other than to prove you have less credibility than Prager U and AEI (which says alot). You don't want the truth, you want to be right. I don't argue with fools who conduct themselves this way. Move along.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/19 04:28 PM
1

Okay, and I'm pointing out that working with conservative thinktanks as a liberal doesn't negate how the votes are cast by the liberal. Aside from that, you have to provide for your family, and the fact of the matter is, a lot of feminist organizations have outright blackballed her, and used their pull to ruin her reputation. Actually, if a conservative thinktank is willing to diversify their workforce with dissenting political stances, while the liberal thinktanks do not, which do you think pos…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/19 03:58 PM
1

I don't really give a shit about your opinion on those institutions. If my apathy of your opinion on these institutions is the same as defending them, this is yet another feminist argument tactic. For the nth time now, less time trying to discredit your dissenters and more time strengthening your arguments will go a long way. If this is not the route you choose, quit wasting my time, and move along. If I wanted to be subjected to these argument tactics, I'd go argue with a feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/19 03:22 PM
1

I'm just making an observation. You're taking a different approach. Again, less time trying to discredit your dissenters, and more time strengthening your own argument will go a long way. Basically, you're full of shit if you think this approach is the best course of action. Feminists argue the same way, and they even go as far as to refer to facts (or really anything that challenges feminist orthodoxy) as propaganda. It doesn't work for them, and you're arrogant if you think it will work for yo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/19 03:12 PM
1

Not really. It's absurd to believe that a liberal can't work for a conservative institution. Now I love the shift in argument approach. The maneuver from the argument that she's not a liberal, to AEI being a conservative propagandist. You look silly trying to paint AEI as a propagandist. Perhaps you should spend more time trying to strengthen your own arguments versus investing time into trying to discredit others through unfalsifiable smears. This however means you need to operate with some int…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/19 02:53 PM
0

Affirmative action only succeeds in mismatching applicants with specific institutions. Abolish affirmative action and all quotas, and let people do things for themselves. We don't need big brother dictating to these establishments how many applicants they have, who fall under specific demographics. What's important is for those positions to be occupied by well-qualified individuals.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/19 11:30 PM
2

Incredible that they're actually launching a defense under the guise of speculated nuance.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 06:04 PM
2

What if? Oh my god! What if my Aunt had balls? Well then she would be my uncle. There is more to the story. The woman is a simply a cunt. This video truly represents feminism. Feminism is the subway car, that provides women with sanctuary and salvation from the perils of man. The blind man represents men who actually need help, and who innocently wander into these women only spaces that seek to inflict no harm. The woman who threw him off represents the feminists who hate men, nor see them as pe…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 05:12 PM
10

I believe in Rick and Morty they called it The Great Passive Aggression.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:40 AM
36

"If women were in charge, the would be no war."
/r/MensRights16/12/19 08:29 PM
96

Hahahaha! I saw that, and I felt that sarcastic comment really summed up the feminist approach to men's issues.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 06:34 PM
4

I regret voting for this fool.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/19 04:12 PM
1

I used an extreme example. There's no basis in reality that the subliminal messages are there, and there's no basis in reality that a woman is a man, or a man is a woman. Okay, but it's not live and let live if the rights of transgender get to take precedence over the majority. Why do girls in high school have to experience discomfort in the locker room because one boy decides he wants to change in there because that's how he feels? That's not right. The same thing has happened with high school …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 07:21 PM
2

I just did. The Skimmington ride is a prime example.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:38 AM
8

Tell me this - if people didn't believe men to be violent brutes then why were men granted the legal right to be violent brutes? They weren't granted the legal rights to be violent brutes. Usually when you people use "implicit" what it means is this is your opportunity to strawman. I suggest you look up the Skimmington Ride. Women at least got marginal sympathy when they were victims. Men, on the other hand, were mocked and ridiculed if they were the victims of domestic violence. So if anyone ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:31 AM
2

Exactly. You and I have disagreed on a few issues now, IIRC.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:24 AM
4

Right. Because one comment by one redditor is totally representative of the entire sub. Considering your religion advocates for men to live subservient to women, by paying spousal support, alimony, and child support; my claim holds water. Your dismissiveness does not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:19 AM
1

Actually, it isn't. If anyone's mind is closed, it's yours. You refuse to acknowledge that men who believe they're women, or women who believe they're men are living in a delusion. You've fallen prey to the special pleading fallacy. It's a delusion if someone wants to identify as a different race, or animal, or inanimate object, but nooooooooo... you can totally change your sex. You are now trying to be right. And the best course of action, in your eyes, is to paint me as the close minded one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:17 AM
6

You're trying to defend a religion based in man-hating. You asked if it was an important issue against men's issues, and it is. You're here trying to downplay the hindrance that feminism is towards men's progress. I'm just not guillable enough to buy what you're selling. You even took the time to bash capitalism (an economic ideology that has done more to raise people out of poverty than feminism has).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:12 AM
11

This is also what people believed prior to the invention of the Duluth model. Prove it. Because I'm going to enjoy watching this claim blow up in your face. Just because feminists put it on paper doesn't mean they were the ones who invented and popularised these attitudes and prejudices. Actually that's exactly what it means. Nobody else prior to second wave feminism dared to compare marriage to a man to being locked up in a concentration camp.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:07 AM
9

When feminism has billions of dollars, and a grand scale of influence in politics, the media, and academia, it's A big issue. Feminism operates under the premise of man-hatred. It always has, and the amount of traction it gained has afforded it the autonomy to literally hinder men's progress, by demonizing masculinity, men, and anything to do with the XY chromosomes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/19 12:04 AM
12

Nope. It was a demonization of men. Taken straight from your feminist theory: The feminist theory underlying the Duluth Model is that men use violence within relationships to exercise power and control. This is straight up propaganda. To say it has caused no harm is disingenuous. That model is why men can't avoid being charged with false misconduct allegations unless they have direct video evidence proving otherwise. In other words, the model places the burden of proof on the accused.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 11:56 PM
4

Well, when feminism has lobbied to put out misleading, false, incorrect, or outright deceptive statistics that paint men as controlling, oppressive brutes, then we can safely attribute feminism as a men's issue. That's not to say that feminism tackles women's issues, or that feminism is pro-women. For the record, I don't think it is. Don't forget that some of these theories have resulted in policy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 11:51 PM
7

Well, considering the fact the feminism is opposed to addressing men's issues, actually yes we can. If feminism didnt oppose male progress, I would agree with you. Feminist logic: Men's rights is not pro-men, they're anti-women. Feminism is pro-woman, they're also pro-men. When your religion no longer stands opposed to addressing male issues, your comment might hold some water.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 11:43 PM
2

Because my reason for not meeting the demands of gender pronouns stems from the suicide rate. The conventional argument is that misgendering is what is causing them to kill themselves, and so therefore I must address them by the correct pronouns. Never mind the fact that I'm not talking to them, I'm referring to them. If I were talking to them, there are not gender pronouns for the 2nd person: you. I'm not going to continue arguing over semantics with you. I think it is a delusion because men wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 11:38 PM
2

Nope. It isn't passive hostility. If you perceive it as hostility, perhaps you're the one being hostile. I took your logic and turned it on its head. To be specific, I don't want research on trans sexuality. I want evidence that the reason the majority of the transgender suicide rate is due to people like me, who refuse to entertain psychological delusion. I'm requesting research on the SPECIFIC matter of transgender suicide rates. The video is entitled The terrible fraud of 'transgender medicin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 09:03 PM
2

Not sarcasm. I'm taking your logic and using it against you. Are you more concerned with reaching an understanding or are you more concerned with being right? I ask because people who commit the argument from authority fallacy tend to be in the latter camp You want to talk about scientific approach, then I challenge you to provide me studies which have shown that misgendering transgender people is the reason their suicide rate is almost half. We are literally arguing semantics. I propose we end …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 08:46 PM
1

Transphobic of you to refer to Rachel as delusional and denying her subjective self-identify Look, let's end this game you're playing and have an actual meaning discussion. Just you and me having a discussion about ideas. Oh! My Reddit Secret Santa gift just arrived. Should I open it now or later? Hmmm
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 08:35 PM
2

It is a delusion. You literally cannot argue against this fact other than commit the special pleading fallacy. If we take your logic, then Rachel Dolezal is not delusional, she suffers from racial identity disorder or racial dysphoria. And you keep citing the APA (the very same APA that referred to masculinity as a mental illness while downplaying video game addiction)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 08:13 PM
2

Because changing the term due to the existence of a stigma isn't a scientific approach. Because the fact remains, it's a delusion. If I suddenly identified as a dog, or I identified as black, that's a delusion. If I am asserting that I am something/someone I'm not. That's a delusion. The sense of being in the wrong type of body, is in fact a delusion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 08:03 PM
1

Nope..not even at all where I was going.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 08:00 PM
2

With respects, what the fuck are you talking about?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 07:57 PM
2

You didnt answer my question
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 07:54 PM
1

Lol. Right, because everyone who disagrees with you is a bigot. Move along, child.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 07:54 PM
3

Why do you think the DSM changed gender identity disorder to gender dysphoria between the 3 and the 5?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 07:37 PM
3

Content is blocked from playing.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 07:28 PM
0

Careful. You're trekking towards the argument from authority fallacy. If you want to cite the DSM-5, I want you to ask the question of WHY they choose to frame it the way they do. The question you should be asking is why isn't it framed that way. If a man thinks he's a woman, or a woman thinks she's a man, what else would you refer to it as if not a delusion? Rachel Dolezal identifies as black, and declares herself to be transracial. Bruce Jenner (who ran someone over while texting and driving) …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 07:18 PM
-1

If a man thinks he's a woman, or a woman thinks she's a man, that is literally a delusion. Trans do suffer from this. And these people require our sympathy. I choose not to indulge their delusions by addressing them by their demanded pronouns. If they want to get the surgery, that's their choice. However, I will caution you that the mortality rate post-surgery actually increases. If this were not the case, and the mortality rate decreased post-surgery, I'd more inclined to believe that referring…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 06:59 PM
1

Loaded question. There is no bigotry, no transphobia, or any of that armchair psychology pseudoscience. I treat transgender with respect, and my unwillingness to enable psychological delusion is not mistreatment. Actually, your unwillingness to discuss nuance of the matter is bigotry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 06:41 PM
0

Because it is not healthy to enable psychological delusion. That's not to say I am not respectful to them. I don't bully, harass, or be violent against them. Aside from that, gendered pronouns are used in the third person. If I'm talking about this transgender woman, I'm referring to them as he. If I were there with them, it would in the second person. I do take them seriously, which is why I don't refer to them by their preferred pronouns, and I don't enable psychological delusion. You're right…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 06:39 PM
0

If treating them as the gender they identify is the correct course of action, you need to explain why the mortality rate increases after reassignment surgery. So clearly the issue runs deeper. Actually, the suicide rate bears a striking resemblance to the root cause of their problems not being addressed. If you think the reason these people are killing themselves because people are mean to them, not only are you infantilizing them, but you're not actually addressing the problem. If you want to a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 10:23 AM
3

Not really, she is uncomfortable with me in the bathroom when she has to go. She's fine with him expressing himself, and even uses the pronouns. Me? I don't because I don't think it's productive to helping them overcome their troubles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 05:27 AM
1

I see the distinction. However, I don't think it's a sound idea to enable psychological delusion. These people need sympathy, not to be enabled. Gf doesn't even like me (her SO) in the bathroom while she's using it. Can't imagine a transgender woman would be any better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 05:26 AM
7

Not married, but my gf actually sat down and watched The Red Pill documentary with me. The scene where Cassie Jaye watched the circumcision footage, she actually started to cry. She understands why I hate feminism, and she understands my issues with the MRM. She appreciates the empathy I have towards men's issues and honestly doesn't like the way feminism manifests. She's not an anti-feminist like I am, but she doesn't like it either. She has to work with a transgender woman who everyday likes t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 01:20 AM
2

I just decided to check his comment history for fun, and he posted this just a few minute ago: if you're whining about "SJW shit" you are probably too much of an ideologue to have an unbiased discussion. Sorry man Yeah, definitely lacks self awareness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/19 05:14 PM
3

I heard about her on the female criminals podcast on Spotify.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/19 07:29 AM
1

Lol. You have not made a single factual statement and have resorted to every gaslighting tactic possible. You haven't contested anything. You made a claim, and did not provide evidence for it. Instead you came back with, "Hurr durr, I'm not gonna prove the sky is blue." You don't want to provide evidence, you just want people to believe your bullshit without evidence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/19 02:21 AM
1

Did not ask for proof of climate change, I asked you for proof that the free market has failed to produce technological innovations to combat it and that the government is the solution. So this was strawman number 1. It sounds like you are mad that the government isn't a totalitarian police state that watches us every moment and denys us the right to bear arms to protect ourselves. Nope, I'm remarking on the fact that the government is unable to protect citizens from shooters, and so I have no d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/19 02:18 AM
1

Well then if they're so obvious then you should have no problem finding evidence for it. You are not exempt just because you try to disguise your claims as factual. Face it, your argument sucks, and you have no evidence to prove it. So your only option is to try and state as a matter of fact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/19 01:24 AM
1

Yeah, now you're talking out your ass and proving you know squat about technology that has been produced over the past several decades. I'd ask you to prove your claims, but you're probably going to continue to gaslight (hurr durr u deny realityz), or you're going to make every effort to avoid providing evidence (likely both). Look, you're naive if you think the government is the solution to combatting climate change, and to make this argument, you have to throw out a lot of data concerning free…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/19 01:12 AM
1

Ha! This is straight up bullshit. Technological innovations have happened without government tax enforcement. I've stated what you need to convince me of: that the government is adequately equipped to protect its citizens against climate change. They can't even stop a fucking loser from shooting up a high school in Florida, so you expect me to believe they can combat climate change? You're funny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 11:00 PM
1

I'm well-aware that the sky is blue. Stay on topic. Can you prove your claim, yes or no? I'm asking you to prove that being a conservative is a prerequisite to work at AEI. And if it is, you need to also prove that Sommers is a conservative, otherwise you're falling victim to double think. Edit: furthermore, if you do manage to prove both the prerequisite and Sommers as a right-winger, then you may well have discovered a violation of civil rights perpetrated by one of the largest thinktanks in t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 10:56 PM
0

Stay on topic. You made a claim. Prove it. If you can't prove it, then I'm free to dismiss your claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 10:43 PM
1

Putting money towards a government that sucks at protecting citizens is not what I would consider reasonable. So no, that doesn't sound reasonable. What does sound reasonable is incentivizing technological innovation into the free market. It's had a successful track so far. You want to say the corporations will do what is profitable, but you're underestimating the politicians who will do what is best for themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 10:08 PM
2

Prove it. This requires you to prove not only that it's a prerequisite, but also you now need to prove that Sommers is a right-winger. Good luck.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 10:00 PM
5

I didn't make the argument that a checker at CFA is the same as being employed by AEI, nor do I think this is the case. This is called a strawman fallacy. What I did do, was remark on the absurdity of your logic: that someone who works at an establishment with predominantly conservative views makes them a conservative. Now, are you going to provide us with proof that she's right-wing, or are you going to continue every deflection tactic you can deploy? It's pretty misogynistic of you to deny a l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 08:43 PM
3

Sure, dude. I'll leave you to your delusions of grandeur.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 08:23 PM
2

Man, it must be great to live inside your head.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 08:08 PM
2

I've not made an argument. I've merely disputed yours. So not only do you fail to distinguish between right-wingers and everyone else (something my 13-year-old brother is capable of doing), but you can't even tell the difference between an argument and disputing an argument. People like you are doing this sub a great service, and people like you are who I blame for the rise in alt-right scum.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 08:01 PM
5

That's asking too much. You're actually supposed to Google what he suggested and read all of the search results until you find what he read about her. You're also supposed to just presume she's right-wing because of her employer, and her views literally mean nothing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 07:58 PM
3

No, I didn't admit anything. You, however have shown the entire subreddit has no reason to take you seriously. You're a clown, at best. The best attack you have is "Hurr durr right-wang" "Hurr durr Koch bros" How nice of you to make a $20 donation to the Trump campaign! EDIT: Yep, confirmed. You're a menslibber. Anyone to the right of you, is a right-winger, because you lack the mental capacity to be able to distinguish between right-wingers and everyone else. All fallacies, no facts. You're one…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 07:46 PM
5

And if you can't be arsed to be able to distinguish between right-wing and not right wing, nobody in this sub has any obligation to offer a charitable interpretation to what you have to say. Move along, little boy and come back to the discussion with the rest of us adults when you're all growed up. EDIT: I just realized who you are. I've encountered you before. You're one of the few delusional supremacists in this subreddit who is more concerned with being correct, not concerned with assessing t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 07:34 PM
8

Right. Because someone's employer is totally representative of their political stance, and how they vote is totally irrelevant. Solid logic, bro. That means Jimmy John's employees all agree with big game hunting, that means everyone who works at CFA are Christian's, that means everyone who works at Hobby Lobby thinks birth control should NOT be included on employee health insurance plans. But let's pretend you're right (you're not). But let's pretend you are. Is "she is actually right wing" actu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 07:28 PM
8

Except she's not right-wing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 06:44 PM
2

Your explanations are all possible, however I do want to add something to them. For your first point, RAINN actually oscillates between insanity and sanity when it comes to their stance on rape culture. They hold the view that 1 in 6 women are and will be raped in their lifetime. However, they diverge with feminist camps on the matter of rape culture. If you examine their publication here - IT WILL PROMPT A DOWNLOAD - I direct you to the third paragraph to see their 1 in 6 claim. However, if you…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 06:17 PM
4

You misunderstand. The mainstream right does not challenge climate change, they challenge the proposed policies that the Left claims will "fix" climate change. That's a point I agree with them on, because I've yet to hear a convincing argument for why giving more money to big brother is going to fix climate change. To be fair, it's tough to convince me as to why Trump's (or any corrupt politician's) administration should get more of my tax dollars to do yet another bad job at protecting us. Howe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 05:29 PM
2

If they do, I agree. However, forgive me if I'm not willing to believe them when they say they do. The main reason being, that these people display a great effort to appear as though they're victims because they find virtue in victimhood. Anita Sarkeesian did this, but never provided proof. When I still had my FB, I would see in groups or on posts, feminists talk about how they were raped and the police did nothing. After watching them get the validation, I'd screenshot the comments, look at the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 05:15 PM
5

The question I'm more concerned with is: what the hell is wrong with her?
/r/PussyPass12/12/19 07:02 AM
31

Honestly, it must be nice to be a feminist. They're well-represented in the media, academia, and the government. They're never expected to be held to the same standard as every other supremacy ideology. If they're wrong, they can just blame patriarchy, mansplaining, or toxic masculinity. If they make sexist comments, there's an abundance of self-loathing men standing ready with their dick in their hands just waiting to defend m'lady from criticism. They're allowed to bully, lie, exploit, mislead…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 06:38 AM
1

Interesting comment. So you admit the problem stems from teaching them the wrong thing. I can agree with that. My upbringing was more along the lines of my parents telling me that I needed to get a good woman. A good woman who has her shit together, and meets my standards. I was ingrained with the idea that I can't have this until I'm a good man who has his shit together. It almost sounds like these people don't understand delayed gratification.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/19 03:51 PM
1

Just my opinion, but if these people want to be loved, they can't just expect it to happen based on some inflated sense of self-importance. It's normal for them to want to be loved, but they have to bring something to the table. Expecting to be loved as they are, in a state of being where they're not measuring up to their potential, is selfish. I must confess, though, I've never knowingly met an incel in real-life. So perhaps you have formed a different perspective on the matter than I have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/19 06:09 AM
1

If I didn't, I'd be a feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/19 02:47 AM
1

So not only are you apologizing for non feminist women getting rape and death threats, you're now trying to pretend that you male feminists aren't creeps and perverts. In the very same thread where you refuse to condemn rape and death threats against non feminist women. Let that sink in for a second, before you continue to allow yourself to go die on that hill.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/19 02:29 AM
1

There's a difference between wanting to be loved, and entitlement. Incels don't just want to be loved, they feel entitled to love for selfish reasons.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/19 02:10 AM
1

Here is an article from Medium entitled, I’m Suspicious of Male “Feminists” — And You Should Be Too where they argue that male feminists have their own motives for adopting the feminist label. I'm going to start with Kyle Payne who is honestly just a creep. Next, we get Hugo Schwyzer with an attempted murder-suicide. It wasn't enough for him to simply only kill himself. He's since continued. Next is Onision. Need I say more? I believe he was at one time collecting alimony from his ex-wife. That …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/19 02:07 AM
1

Certainly. Allow me some time to compile some sources for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/19 10:53 PM
1

Right. You accuse me of intellectual dishonest after you come on here to this subreddit and refer to the majority of is as reactionary chuds and hated by women. You're a damn fool. Point stands. Feminists are misogynistic and no different than Incels with regards to their entitlement to women's allegiance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/19 10:52 PM
1

Spare me your armchair psychology pseudoscience, pet. Let's instead focus on how much you hate women, so much to the point that you refuse to acknowledge some of the issues, I've so plainly laid out for you to consider. I'm glad that I've struck enough of a nerve that your hatred for women was revealed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/19 09:44 PM
1

Hahaha! Like clockwork. Your pre-programmed and brainwashed responses were not any less absurd than the hundreds before you. Move along, pet. Or stay, if you you feel so compelled to entertain us with your predictability.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/19 09:24 PM
1

Cool story, bro. Now be a good little pet and go back to your feminist masters and tell them about this logically insightful comment you posted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/19 09:03 PM
1

I'll dispute this and say that it doesn't just stop at misandry, but extends to misogyny. The reason being: we consider Incels to be misogynistic because they feel entitled to women. The same could be said for feminism. Feminists possess a sense of entitlement towards women's allegiance much in the same regard. Sarah Palin received rape and death threats, her daughter was essentially ridiculed for getting pregnant out of wedlock, or even that other feminist that Tim Pool talked about who was ban…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/19 08:29 PM
5

There is no such thing as toxic masculinity or toxic femininity. Masculinity and femininity are terms that stand well enough on their own, and appropriately and adequately describe the respective states of being for both males and females. Adding a modifier like "toxic" does nothing but obscure the meaning of each term. Consider how the term "toxic masculinity" has essentially led people to associate the term masculinity with descriptor toxic, and so now the term toxic is the number one term ass…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/19 09:08 PM
1

If there wasn't much, to begin with, I wouldn't really put removing them to be a priority. Perhaps, creating flairs that can be used to indicate a low-effort post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/19 07:54 PM
1

I don't debate American politics with foreigners, nor do I expect Euros to debate me, an American, on European politics. Nothing personal, but your opinion is just as worthless on American politics as my opinions are on yours.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/19 05:23 PM
1

Wait, you're not an American?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/19 05:13 PM
1

"If you didn't understand my point, then you're part of the problem." Whatever, dude. I have no reason to engage with your foolishness any further. I'm sure the irony is lost on you, when you walk around making statements like this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/19 04:28 PM
1

The media doesn't have a strong right-wing influence, nor is it growing. With respects, what on earth are you talking about? You use one outlet to try and prove a trend of growing right-wing media influence, but you disregard the dozens of other outlets that are hailed as beacons of factual reporting despite evidence to the contrary. Quit it, guy. The majority of growing right-wing influence comes from common right-wingers who go out and engage with people who they disagree with, not the media. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/19 03:50 PM
1

Point stands. Originally, someone tried to distinguish Bernie supporters from authoritarianism. That's hogwash. Bernie is a socialist, and modus operandi includes bigger government being more involved in people's lives. This by definition is a power seize. I'd hardly refer to /r/conservatives or the shitposters on /r/T_D as authoritarians. Especially considering they represent a minority demographic on Reddit. It's not the people found in these types of subreddits who are found out at "protests"…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/19 02:14 PM
1

Just saying. You can't deny that there exists a large overlap in behavior between feminism and progressivism. They each have their own blend of political correctness. They both seek to enforce compliance. Both want control of the dialogue. Zero tolerance for discourse. Some of their views are myopic and actually damage the groups they try to protect. Each group demonizes dissenters in their own respective way. Bernie focuses on the same Marxist (oppressor vs. oppressed) ideology. His gimmick is …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/19 11:34 PM
1

Ooohh when did you find your way to this sub, bro? Lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/19 06:01 PM
1

Feminists and the media were not concerned with that film causing mass shootings. If they were, I will say this as directly as possible: they're idiots (yes, all of them). Much like the same pearl-clutching Christians who insisted that video games cause violence, or when people say rap music causes violence. If feminists hate something, they will find a way to frame their vitriol as a concern. However, let me return to my original point. They were not concerned with the film causing mass shootin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/19 05:59 PM
1

"Hate speech" is a subjective term. It's absurd to advocate for policy based on subjective standard. What may be considered "hate speech" to one person, won't necessarily be considered as such to others. It's absurd that "adults" are advocating to have the state punish people who hurt their feelings. These people need to grow up. The point of being pro-free speech is that you're not required to like or agree with the speech. These people are too stupid to understand that their blend of fascism i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/19 11:47 PM
2

I'm not sure if she is "cured" or if in remission. My point is, this man's wife is suffering from severe medical conditions, and he's having a hard time coping with it. I can't imagine how they both feel.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 10:40 PM
1

I recommend you read an article by the New Yorker called Why Facts Don't Change Our Minds. I promise you, it will prove to be insightful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/19 07:14 PM
1

Wow. This woman is a perfect representation of Feminism as a religion. This guy disagrees with her ideology, that's it. I'd wager that if they were to sit down and discuss other matters like hobbies, art, film, and even how to help others, they'd have a lot to talk about. However, she's so entrenched in her religion that she views him as a threat, so much to the point that she's talking shit about a guy who is losing his wife to cancer. People like her are why feminism (and leftism, in general) …
/r/MensRights24/10/19 04:51 PM
1

I got you, fam!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/19 04:38 PM
2

First off, I greatly appreciate you commenting to add to the discussion. Not just for making the thread more fruitful, but for making sure you help me address my mental blindspots. I see what you're saying about statistical disparity as "evidence" of discrimination. Perhaps that was a bad way to put it, but you seem to understand the point I'm conveying: that statistical disparity alone is not enough to affirm claims. I did consider rates for death penalty sentences, but honestly I didn't really…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/19 02:31 AM
5

I'll start things off here. However, some of my sources aren't going to fall within your parameters, but I hope provide some food for thought. My goal is to present my evidence that both affirms the claim of sentencing disparities while directly refuting the negation of the claim. This one falls just outside of your date range, but says that the disparity is around 63%. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2144002 It asserts that this figure was lower due to not accounting for oth…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 02:44 PM
3

Charge of Irascibility (code: red), Charge of Cowardace (code: yellow), Charge of Hypersensitivity (blue), and Charge of Misogyny (code: black) are their four go-to anti-male shaming tactics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 02:58 AM
5

NY Times? Can we archive this trash?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/19 05:31 PM
1

https://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm Perhaps this will help.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/19 02:48 AM
2

Patriarchy in action.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/19 03:21 PM
3

Only 6 years? Well, damn, they are handing out these pussypasses like Halloween candy this year.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/19 01:47 AM
14

Someone came to leftwingmaleadvocates some time back and tried to ask why the focus on feminism and not men's issues. Well, it's because supremacy ideologies such as feminism are men's issues.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen12/10/19 06:12 PM
2

The truth hurts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/19 04:10 PM
6

What can be done? Not sure. As I'm probably sounding like a broken record at this point, dad deprivation is likely a factor. The issue could also be that those kids who bully don't learn boundaries that are supposed to be enforced at home. I have friends and we give each other shit all the time. We know where to draw the line. I'd say a good start is to teach the children about this line. Next, I encourage children to learn martial arts. It's excellent for self-defense. Anecdote time! I was bull…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/19 04:52 PM
1

I hadn't known about that channel until I saw it posted here in this thread, but yes, they did.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/10/19 08:21 PM
3

I'm not going to agree that it needs to end. I'm going to say that it needs to be an option. There's nothing wrong with being the breadwinner, or staying at home to take care of the children and maintain the house. Men tend to marry down because they want someone to take care of the children. There's nothing wrong with that. It's a fair deal for them to decide to make sure they have a partner making sure the home is maintained, and the children are cared for. What is wrong is the feminist paradi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/19 05:16 PM
1

Sir, yes sir!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 08:26 PM
0

Cool story, bro. Focusing on the minority as representative of the majority. Yeah, that's not disingenuous at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 03:00 PM
1

I recommend you read a book called Galileo's Daughter. Very insightful. At least you're starting to understand the difference between men in power and men not in power. You're league ahead of the rest of your feminist ilk.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 02:50 PM
1

Man, it must be nice living inside your head. Delusional, you're always right, and you're the enlightened one. And the best part is you get to make up any vague claim you want, and meanwhile the person you're talking to is incapable of understanding normal and fair discussion. You even make counterarguments to things I never said, and yet I'm the one who can't read. I mean, I'll admit I have an ego. But you... you, my friend, may even have a bigger ego than #45. Congratulations.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 02:45 PM
1

Lol! I sound uneducated and yet here you are trying to paint men in power as representative of men not in power. Achievements stolen by men? You sound like a hotep, only dumber. That's fine if you want to say I'm uneducated when you're displaying a profound amount of ignorance and man-hating.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 02:42 PM
1

Not saying they don't. I'm saying they were a minority amongst those tasks. On the grand scale (and there's nothing wrong with that). Do you know how to read?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 02:36 PM
1

Hahahahahahahahaha!!!! Men are the ones who went out and provided for their family, but women get all the credit for raising children. Hey, genius, guess what, you can't raise children if they're dead from starvation. Hey, genius, how does it feel knowing that you're now giving women all the blame for the rise in mass shooters? If we run with your logic about women raising children, then women are to blame for mass shootings. If women get credit for the good, they get the blame for the bad. Men …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 02:30 PM
0

men dont raise a finger. they just want the good side of everything without having to work about it Lol! Ironically, your argument here is actually true about women. Women wanted the good side of the right to vote, but no responsibility. Men, however, are willing to go out and make sure their children are taken care of, even at the expense of their own health. So your argument is absolutely 100% false, and it shows you have eaten up way too much feminist propaganda.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 02:26 PM
0

Majority of firefighters are men, not women. Right. So you saw it on TV, so therefore it must be true. Patriarchy. . . ah yes, your religion's equivalent of the devil. In your entire rambling, not once did you actually refute anything I said, other than to say, "women did that too." Yes, they did, however, they were a minority amongst those great pioneers.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 02:20 PM
0

Lol! "If it wasn't for women, male kids would have never survived" If it wasn't for men, female kids would have never survived. See? I can make vague generalizations too. And the fact of the matter is, men didn't have to grant women those rights. "Most men are not interested in taking care of babies." Hahahahahaha!!! This claim has been debunked. Your man-hating is showing. Men would love to spend more time with their children. This is true for most fathers. I'm sorry that you've been brainwashe…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 02:17 PM
1

Just saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 04:21 AM
0

Blah blah blah . . . spare me the speculation about how you believe the life of a stranger on the internet would have been different. I honestly don't care to read your fanfiction. It's a simple concept: men in power, men not in power, women in power, women not in power.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 04:07 AM
6

Your lifestyle is none of our business (so long as you're not some twisted lunatic in some form or other). However, just like everyone else, your opinions and posts are subjected to rigorous scrutiny and everything is up for debate. I couldn't care less about what you are, so much as who you are as a person. I'd wager a large portion of this sub shares my sentiments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/19 01:27 AM
1

Right. It's mostly women who run into burning buildings, collect your trash, mine your resources and luxuries, build your houses, fight crime, die in wars, etc. Men are the ones who farmed the crops, hunted your food, and politically, economically, socially, & sexually liberated women. Men had every ability to keep women in domesticated roles and not allow then to break outside of those roles, but they didn't. I want you to Google these names, and tell me what their accomplishments were: Herbert…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 12:45 AM
-1

You ask a loaded question, but the short answer is your cherrypicking men in power as representative of all men is going to do nothing but show just how disingenuous you are. There are, and has always been, four quadrants of society. 1.) Men in power 2.) Women in power You'll likely try to cherry pick these two quadrants while intentionally omitting the following quadrants: 3.) Women in power 4.) Men not in power There are dozens of ways to effectively study history. Pretending that group #1 (a …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 12:39 AM
0

Imagine being so illiterate you're making counterarguments to stuff that someone didn't say. Fortunately, you don't have to. 620K MEN died in that war to free those slaves. But yeah, women are more generous than men. Men run into burning buildings, fight your crime, provide your food, innovate your technology, and decided we need to change the way we treat each other. If you want to argue that those groups were oppressed, then you need to acknowledge those groups could have been kept oppressed. …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 12:34 AM
2

Right. Women are more generous. Never mind the fact that men are willing to go out and provide them with the option of having to work or providing them with the opportunity to raise children. That's not generous at all. Men build society up to benefit their fellow man. Men have allowed women and oppressed groups to enter the political arena, and even so much to the point that women have greater rights & protection under the law, more access to more resources, benefits of privilege, and access to…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 02:51 PM
47

https://www.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/comments/8sx160/an_update_from_jasoninhell/ Prior context is posted in the comments by the moderator.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 07:21 AM
12

Wow. First off, it's upsetting to hear that his ex-in-laws are bullies. Second, I'm glad that he didn't resort to heavy drinking as a coping mechanism, and that despite his ex-in-laws being horrible, he still tries to be understanding about their situation. I'm happy that he is doing better. His posts after his children passed were absolutely heartbreaking. Time does fly. Crazy.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 11:44 PM
7

He posted an update?! Well goddamn man, don't leave us hanging. Link us up! He deleted his other account.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 11:15 PM
331

Was that the Jason Worley in hell post on one of the relationship subreddits? I remember the initial post about his ex-wife having an affair with an older neighbor, the subreddit telling him to file for divorce, and then the update. My god, the update. If I recall, she killed them while he was taking a nap in the basement, then tried to kill herself. Then I remember looking at his profile and seeing comments made by him where he stated he failed as a father because he failed to protect them.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 10:35 PM
1

Your argument about the population is 100% absurd. I hope one day you realize that. For starters, I suggest you take a ordinary differential equations class to understand logistics, population models, limits, and rates of change. "We should all be having less than 3 kids." This statement alone reflects the arrogance you possess. I cannot fathom the hubris you possess to make you believe yourself to be the arbiter of human reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 07:22 PM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights12/09/19 06:56 PM
3

Underrated comment right here. I see privilege as being an unearned advantage. I want to say that term is an oxymoron.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen10/09/19 05:03 AM
2

Update: Amy added Dr. Farrell to the /r/IAmA sidebar calendar. I think they have a reminder bot set to it. Looks like I won't be able to make the AMA, myself. But this mod is going to do me a solid, and get my question in. I can't wait to see what questions you all bring to the discussion. My next objective is to get Dr. Farrell on Joe Rogan's podcast.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/19 05:49 PM
1

Just another update: Amy emailed me and said she added Dr. Farrell to the calendar on the /r/IAmA sidebar.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 05:44 PM
3

Hey, /u/Forgetaboutthelonely! I need you to update the time, because they felt the post would garner more traffic at 2 PM PST instead of 11 AM PST! This time is now set in stone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/19 05:05 PM
1

I just made an update: They felt 2 PM PST would be a better time to host this AMA.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 05:02 PM
2

Not necessarily, it just would have been a different type of learning experience.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:08 AM
2

This is absolutely a fine example of that line of thinking I have such a problem with. I'll swap some words out from your title, to convey exactly what I mean: So my male white drama teacher is a feminist democrat, and is surprised I, female a black person isn't. What this line of thinking from these people tells me is that they're not the progressive champions of equality they proclaim themselves to be. Had he actually been a progressive champion of equality, then he wouldn't have implicitly gr…
/r/MensRights31/08/19 07:09 PM
3

"Ask me anything"
/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:34 AM
1

AMA is scheduled for September 12th (less than 2 weeks away) at 11 AM PST. Spread the word.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/19 01:07 AM
5

Prisons are centers for dad-deprived men. If you want to dismantle the prison system and reform it, then go for it. However, putting a band-aid on a gunshot wound isn't going to help in the long run. I'm all about emphasizing rehabilitation as opposed to punishment (assuming the crime wasn't too severe). Your best bet is to start tackling the issues with upbringing. The fact of the matter is, as dad deprivation has risen, so has incarceration. It's more likely that mass incarceration is a result…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/19 04:24 AM
3

I've been trying to get him on Rubin Report and Joe Rogan. If I can get some help on trending him, I think we can make it happen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/19 12:53 AM
1

Ah, then that's my bad. I should have clarified. Feminism has plenty of well-deserved blame for a lot of matters. Male suicide simply isn't one of those things Like the ADHD over-prescription thing? Correct. It seems you have done some reading. Not just that, but the purpose void, dad deprivation, etc. The issues that black men face are (in my opinion) more severe. They may kill themselves at a lower rate, but unfortunately, they're pretty much the majority of murder victims. Their dad deprivati…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 11:04 PM
1

You're not directly saying that correlation equals causation but you're definitely suggesting that male suicide and feminism are linked. Actually, no, I'm not. Here, let me say it again: "You know what, since feminism's establishment, male suicide has increased. While correlation does not imply causation, perhaps feminist control over the dialogue should be relinquished to other groups so we can expand our options and who are participating in the dialogue." If you want to know my thoughts on why…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 01:33 PM
1

I don't disagree.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 06:51 AM
1

I personally disagree with the reformation of religion being wrong. If Christianity existed now as it did centuries ago, I'd wager that guys like me would be dead. They didn't take as kindly to atheists as Christians today do. It has since been declawed and while I still oppose the religion, and disagree vehemently with it, I'm glad that ideas and values have evolved.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 06:24 AM
2

And? That doesn't make my comment any less valid. Disagreements led to war, death, etc. nobody can disagree. However, disagreements have also led to innovative advancements in science, medicine, politics, economics, technology. It has also led to a more profound understanding of human nature, reformation of religion, and ways to explore different ways to do things . . . all things you and I can agree have not only saved lives, but also enriched lives, extended lives, and educated lives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 06:10 AM
2

We kissed and made up. I think he wants to be the big spoon (spoiler alert: I'm the big spoon).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 04:20 AM
10

I think a great start is to find common ground with /r/MensLib. For example, it is no secret that I'm not a fan of the subreddit or male feminists. However, I can fuck around with them and have a long discussion with any menslibber who is as passionate at discussing male suicide and ways we can reduce it. I have zero doubt in my mind that those men want to reduce male suicide. Maybe the mods can collaborate and gather data on male suicides, layout the figures and open the sub up and say, "What i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 04:09 AM
1

I'm glad that I deleted my FB and IG. I have Snapchat because my aunt likes to snap I love you video messages to me, and she takes screenshots and adds them to her gorgeous nieces and nephews album (as she calls it). Then I have Reddit. That's all I plan to have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 03:52 AM
1

I'm absolutely here to learn and grow, and have no interest in "being right" over the truth. Then you and I are 100% on the same page. I don't doubt you mean well in the grand scheme of things. Feminism has had some positive impact on our society, no matter how much I may despise the ideology. I agree that when the movement started to call out men being pigs, that was a positive impact. I'll agree that some of the actions feminism have taken has produced astounding liberties for our mothers, dau…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 03:40 AM
1

Understandable. My issue is they didn't do anything to address what I said. Instead they chose to be dismissive. They have yet to address my point. Is it possible you can ask them to address what I actually said as opposed to dismiss it as "whining." This sub seeks to have constructive discussions, but I can't imagine it's constructive just to say that I (and those who share my sentiments) are simply "whining."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/19 11:47 PM
2

Imagine that. Doesn't actually address the constructive criticism and chooses to deflect. I provide you with a solution that would benefit both the feminist movement and the MRM, and you try to say that I'm pointlessly whining about feminism. It's no wonder that feminism gets so much hate across both the left and right. I was hoping to achieve the idea that feminism can stand to relinquish control of the dialogue so that we can actually get somewhere in the discussion about these matters. Not on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/19 11:35 PM
6

Okay, here's a solution I propose for the feminist movement: relinquish control of the dialogue on men's issues. It's honestly that simple.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/19 10:59 PM
8

Then we have the constant parading mantra of the "Feminists don't hate men" myth. Men are expected to believe this despite the fact that feminists insistently affirm the men are evil narrative. Feminists constantly put out false, misleading, manipulated, or outright fraudulent publications that paint men as scum, predators, subhuman animals, and morons. Despite the fact that women have about 4 dozen rights, privileges, protections, and access to resources under the law which are not extended to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/19 08:35 PM
8

But I'm not done yet . . . Feminist Valerie Solanas attacks a male cartoonist. Feminists shut down a forum for battered husbands. If you're keeping up with my proposed drinking game, I recommend you get an Uber if you need to go somewhere. However, you can find something here since the original video seems to be gone. You can also check on the Canadian Association For Equality's YouTube channel for it. Feminists opposed a bill that would grant anonymity to those accused of rape until a convictio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/19 08:35 PM
9

Feminism is 100% rooted in man-hating and supremacy. So, you want to discuss how men's issues aren't discussed, but you overlook one of the greatest inhibitors of men achieving equality of opportunity. Feminism doesn't do anything to help men, and they spend a lot of time trying to convince people that they do. Want an example? Here's an example: The Warren Farrell Protest at the University of Toronto had a pretty nasty turnout. Dr. Warren Farrell, arguably one of the best public figures to spea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/19 08:34 PM
1

That is relevant. I hadn't noticed that. Great observation. In regards to the post, yes, I understand how toxic it came off. However, at the end of the day, I found myself asking what exactly was incorrect about what they said. I admired the candor presented in the post, but obviously, had I authored it, I would have tried a different approach in a lot of respects.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/19 05:31 AM
5

Well, in my opinion, advocacy for men should come in two phases: Phase 1: fighting for equality of opportunity, to include specifying explicit, clear, and realistic victory conditions as to when the fight is over. There needs to be an endgame in terms of demands the movement wants. We should strive to make sure that we ONLY want equality of opportunity, and that we stand against equality of outcome. Equality of outcome takes away from other demographics, and feminism insistently fighting for equ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/19 07:23 PM
6

Terms like this are exactly what you say they are: unfalsifiable smears. Not only is it a smear, but it robs the person of agency and the opportunity to prove otherwise. Uncle Tom and all of those similar smears target against blacks who don't toe the line are 100% meant to be dismissive. Honestly, these smears are sexist and racist, respectively because the premise is that these people are not thinking "as they should." Should you encounter these people, you are dealing with someone who is not …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/19 06:25 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/19 04:23 PM
3

Found it. I had to dig through my search history, and for whatever reason, the interview wasn't there. So, I had to recall how the interview appeared. I was hoping I found the correct interview, and guess what: Found it! If you direct your attention to 32:45, that begins the segment of the interview where they discuss Cassie.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/19 04:22 PM
1

It was during an interview. Give me a bit to find the exact interview and the exact timestamp.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/19 03:29 PM
5

Armchair psychology pseudoscience isn't much better than guessing, my friend. What prompted the response was a post made on /pol/. Assuming the OP was in fact an SJW, they decided to wander into /pol/ (a place not very friendly towards SJWs) and make the following post: What is wrong with social justice warriors? What do you have against us? We are fighting to end hate, to unite as one and love each other. We are fighting to be treated right without discrimination and for everyone to have equal …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/19 01:47 AM
270

The only hope I have left is that when that day comes the mother will sit down with her daughter to watch the episode with her daughter. She can reflect on what a terrible display of behavior that was. I hope that woman will sit down and apologize to her daughter for the level of disrespect she displayed. I can only hope that over the course of the years, she will become wiser, and when this day comes: she just cringes in pure disgust at herself. However, someone would venture to say that I shou…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/19 01:38 AM
9

That piece is still the best takedown of SJWs and feminists to-date. As someone mentioned already, you can even flop in some terms about far-right groups provide some examples, and it still maintains validity. Honestly, their point was made with the first paragraph and the point was driven home by the end of the second paragraph. The rest was overkill, and not necessary. That's not to say I don't believe the author of the post should have written the rest, just that they had me at the end of par…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/19 01:25 AM
1

Would you get in contact with Farrell to find out if he would be interested, or would you want me to do that too? I will see what I can do, but I think we can make more of an impact if we both reach out to him. Reaching out to other subreddits could be tricky as many of them already dislike and/or have banned me. Then let their actions speak for themselves. If they're not willing to listen to arguably one of the most professional authority figures about men's issues, then they're about helping m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/19 05:59 PM
2

Yeah, it's been a while since his last AMA. Obviously, he's done a lot of work since then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/19 05:40 PM
3

Well, then let's make it happen. It would be interesting all-around to get it to happen, as well as four different subreddits asking different types of questions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/19 05:39 PM
1

Well, then I plan to try and make it happen. As I said, I think it would be the best AMA possible if we could get those other subreddits involved in the discussion. While I don't agree with MGTOW or men's lib on a lot of issues, they come from very different camps from this group or MRAs. Honestly, after writing the post, I thought more about inviting the other groups. Honestly, I think it is important for those groups to be involved due to the different types of questions they would ask.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/19 05:39 PM
1

I have some more, but they're written on post-it's throughout The Boy Crisis. Things like asking, how did you control for this, or remarking on great ways he controlled for a different factor. Etc. I'd probably get about 6 questions in myself. Also, misleading? Lol. I should have just added "request" or something to the title. My mistake. Would you mind also reaching out to the other subreddits to help us get the different groups to ask questions?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/19 05:25 PM
-1

Who are the ones raising these shooters?
/r/MensRights08/08/19 06:43 PM
2

As mentioned by /u/mewacketergi, Warren Farrell. I would also add Paul Elam, not so much because I admire him, but I have some questions I'd like to grill him with. Karen Straughn would be an interesting one. John Gray is another. In terms of feminists, I honestly don't care who agrees to an AMA at this point, because in my experience, most of them don't want to talk about their views in great detail. So, I'd take anyone from the feminist camp.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/19 06:38 PM
1

I think even if there are a couple of people reading the books, that can open up dialogue about what is in those books. In terms of AMAs, the best I can say is to get in contact with Dr. Warren Farrell himself. His email is [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]). He has expressed that he would love to make appearances on shows, and perhaps he can do either a formal AMA here or another subreddit, or he can perhaps even do a video Q&A. I have been in contact with him before.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/19 06:34 PM
2

I would love to see AMAs to this sub. Also, book discussions. Those seem to be lacking in other places.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/19 06:58 AM
7

This image reminds me of that scene from The Simpsons Movie.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:21 PM
1

I wonder if Starz still employs pregnant strippers...
/r/PussyPass19/07/19 06:58 AM
1

So she can send another son to school in a dress? No thanks.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 12:21 AM
1

Nope, I understand it just fine. With how you reject what masculinity is, is reminiscent of anti-vaxxers or flat earthers. I can present you with all the facts in the world, but you're still going to utter your shallow talking points. The fact that you can only strawman me definitely shows you either have no idea what my point is, you don't want to know what my point is, or that you're an illiterate. So, I'd check your own understanding on things before you try to call mine into question. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 04:43 PM
1

We're not talking about bad behavior, we're talking about social pressures and beliefs directed at one gender (i.e. gender norms) that manifest as bad behavior (which is what makes them toxic). And again, you don't know what you are talking about. Masculinity is something earned, not something inhetent pr guven to you. You can simply say it makes them toxic, but there is no such thing as toxic masculinity. Your precious modifier betrays what it actually is. You have now convinced me that sociolo…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 01:06 PM
1

Having more rights and political impact means our society is gynocentric. It doesn't mean women are superior. Stop reading what you want out of facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 01:02 PM
1

Again, bad behavior isn't exclusive just to one sex. Your precious sociology even accepts that notion. You flat out reject it. And you in turn equate bad behavior displayed by bad men, as toxic masculinity, when it's just bad behavior. There's no such thing as toxic masculinity. Men who prey on the weak, are not masculine in a toxic sense, they're not masculine, because masculine men don't exploit and prey on the weak. You adding the modifier to masculinity only betrays the very notion that masc…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 02:01 AM
2

It’s clear that you believe that women are superior. Except that nowhere did I state that they're superior. Check your reading comprehension skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 01:57 AM
1

Two things can be different, yet equal. The color blue and the color green are different, but does that automatically mean that they are unequal? I encourage you to check out and read up about the visible light spectrum. There's some math involved, so your argument falls shy here. Yes, blue and green are in fact unequal. They're also different. Difference and equality/inequality are two different concepts. The original commenter brought up the latter, and for whatever reason, you’re trying to fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/18 11:45 PM
1

Except that I do. So spare me the "you don't understand" nobsense. I took your logic and turned it against you. You group behavior based on sex. This by definition makes you a sexist. A woman from South Dakota killed her son in one of the most brutal ways. Toxic femininity? Or just shitty person?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/18 11:37 PM
1

Starting a bar brawl isn't a good example... Men often start fights because they are taught to be aggressive, to mate guard, to not back down, that masculinity has to be earned through some trial by fire. These are aspects of masculinity, the social expectations and ideas of what it is to "be a man". A moderate dose of them is healthy. Taking them to extremes is not healthy (i.e. toxic). Except men are not the only ones who start fights, nor is, "because they are masculine" even at all a reason …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/18 02:53 AM
1

Unequal does not mean different. Those are two totally different terms and concepts. So are "different" and "equal." He clearly stated that he doesn’t see women as equal. I don't see women as equal. They're different. Anyone with a brain can understand that, no, women and men are not equal. The term ‘different’ is not a synonym of unequal. If something is unequal, it basically means that it’s either inferior or superior. If something is different, it means it is unequal. Lol nice try attempting …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/18 02:33 AM
0

Do you agree that aggression is part of masculinity? Confidence? Self-reliance? Nope. I know these are human characteristics not exclusive to either men or women. These are all things women are capable of as well. That women are capable of them says nothing about the sociological concept of masculinity. No, it just shows that you gender bad behavior and try to blur what it means to be masculine. Context matters. No, it doesn't. Defending your family from an intruder is not toxic masculinity. Agr…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/18 02:15 AM
0

When I hear people talk like you it makes me think they had absolutely shit male role models. Well, unfortunately for you, you're wrong. But judging from the next part of your response, I'd wager you are used to it. My dad adopted three boys from foster care, worked long hours in construction to provide for his family, and did everything in his power to encourage his sons to pursue a better life. Anywho, aside from your armchair psychology failure here, let me address the rest of your hogwash. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/18 01:25 AM
1

Here's more precision for you: Men and women are different. Period. If they are different, you can't say they're equal. This is not to say one sex is superior or inferior to the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/18 01:12 AM
1

Anyone who uses the term "toxic masculinity" has no idea what it means to be masculine. This is evident by how they associate bad behavior with male behavior. It is further evidenced by the fact that you think anyone can just be bestowed as masculine. Any masculine man will tell you that you have to EARN your right to be called masculine. You aren't masculine just because you're a man. "Masculinity is not something given to you, but something you gain. And you gain it by winning small battles wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/18 12:56 AM
1

No, anyone with half a brain sees men and women as different. Different just by nomenclature does nit mean equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/18 12:45 AM
3

Men without good father figures are more likely to wind up addicted to drugs, wind up incarcerated, dropping out of school, committing suicide, or end up diagnosed with some mental health disorder. Gee... it's almost as if having healthy and actively involved parents produces healthy and active children who grow up to be healthy, active adults. Who knew?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/18 12:44 AM
2

I have quite the folder on Miss Yovino.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/08/18 06:57 PM
33

I've PAID traffic fines that were higher.
/r/PussyPass11/06/18 02:16 PM
2

Basically, where you make military equipment unusable. Drilling a hole into the wall of a shipping container just to hang some stupid picture, apparently makes the shipping container useless. Shipping containers cannot have holes in them because they contain highly sensitive equipment, and thus the equipment is not secure. Hope that clarified everything.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 06:26 AM
2

I was located at a different JCOP than he was. I heard a rumors of some justice, but never confirmed it. Every platoon had Soldiers fight under their respective closed door policies. I only talked to the fucker when I had to verify his sensitive items and weapons. Hell, he managed to deadline a goddamn shipping container. Deadline a shipping container, yes you read that correctly. So, in addition to being a pedophile, he is ironically stupid.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 03:06 AM
2

Nope, for a few reasons. I wasn't looking to deal with anyone else's bullshit. I had enough of the war criminals from within our ranks, and I had enough of Afghanistan, NCOs, stupid Soldiers brown nosing to get promoted, so no. I did not The E5 from my company who reported him was instructed not to mention anything either. I wish more taxpayers were aware of the war criminals their tax dollars feed. But then again, people like me who reached a high level of apathy and just want to get out, likel…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 03:01 AM
0

Okay, read the Qur'an.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 11:11 PM
1

You mean the study that says that Muslims are more likely to support BLM (a terrorist organization), and terrorists (Linda Sarsour)? That study? Lol Your study was a series of surveys taken over the span of 19 days. You can cite studies all day, I just need to point to the Qur'an. Read the Qur'an and you will quickly start to see that moderate Muslims do not exist.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 11:08 PM
0

You're absurdly ignorant to Islam. No, they are not okay with gays. If I recall correctly, there was a Muslim event that chased away gay men from the event. I believe it was in Michigan. In addition to this, democrats, the SPLC, and women's movement just so happen to be giving a platform to an advocate of Sharia Law.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 10:10 PM
3

I'm sure they are liberal. Many aggressively promote progressive causes not just for themselves but other minority groups as well. Who? Who is "they"?
/r/MensRights17/11/17 08:03 PM
24

Former U.S. Army Soldier here. I was served in Iraq (08-09) and Afghanistan (10-11). If you only knew the scandals covered up by units in regards to sexual abuse in boys. When I was in Afghanistan, an E-6 from the our brother company was found doing some sick shit to an Afghan boy. The incident was completely swept under the rug, and never reported formally other than word of mouth. He ended up being transferred to my company, but it didn't take long for us to find out why. He was caught trying …
/r/MensRights17/11/17 07:56 PM
2

!Remindme 7 days
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:53 PM
1

I was going to comment, but it seems you didnt come here for a discussion. You just came here to post and pretend you care about men's issues, while dismissing everyone as wrong, when in fact, you don't seem to get it. You have been nothing but dismissive in this thread. The fact that you're stupid enough to dismiss the draft as a "red herring" shows you lack the fundamental understanding as to want exactly the issues with men are. You didnt come here to learn, you came here to try and confirm y…
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:14 AM
1

I'm assuming you didnt read this study, because you left out something that kind of shoots your own point in the foot.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:05 AM
3

So men have a tendency towards criminality just like blacks. The sentencing disparity between blacks and whites is about 10-15% where blacks supposedly serve more time behind bars for the same crime, but men serve 60% more time than women for the same crime. How can you argue for one but not the other? This was your logic.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:03 AM
3

The original post is about female privilege. My question is how can you argue the assertion of white privilege with the sentencing disparity between black and whites, but not for female privilege given the substantially greater disparity? Because if we are going to discuss the concept of unearned advantages, I think it is best to start legally...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 04:23 PM
4

Agreed so far. But don't forget that men may commit more crimes, but men are also the primary victims of crime at the hands of both men AND women. Okay, now how about sentencing disparity between men and women being substantially more than the sentencing disparity between blacks and whites?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 04:11 PM
5

If it has more to do with race than gender, can you explain why there exists a greater disparity in men and women police encounter, than black and white?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 04:02 PM
2

I would love to see them combat oppression in Muslim majority nations. I think the economic impact women have had on our workforce could be great start to addressing why they should let them have equality under the law. The problem is, they don't. I have a nephew who could some day be screwed by some of these measures, and the fact that they blame every societal ill on men, in my opinion, is no different than when right wingers blame all of our problems on "degeneracy." I would never give a dime…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 05:53 PM
9

What I said: Yet they still receive funding and have a large amount of influence. I made no mention of government funds. None. I just said they receive funding. Despite prior behavior showing they're not a group dedicated to equality. They have enough funding to not only push their own agenda, but to fight against measures of their own. I wrote a comment here the other day that explained that feminists are not fighting for equality. Especially if large organizations lilke NOW and Feminist Majori…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 04:55 PM
5

To you, I sounded petulant, but did you read my comment? It doesn't look like it. Here, would you like me to elaborate or are you enjoying your high horse? Because just with me saying the bit I did say, you managed a straw man argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 03:45 PM
3

Fair point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 09:05 AM
13

Yet they still receive funding and have a large amount of influence.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 09:04 AM
1

I think OP lacks the fundamental misunderstanding of what masculinity is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/17 08:32 PM
8

The most effective way to argue against these people, is to take their logic and turn it on its head. For example, Tomi Lahren I'll pick on her and Trevor Noah. When Tomi was on his show Discussing BLM, she told him that the group is violent. Noah deflected with the typical vocal minority part. Tomi went on some tangent trying to refute what he said. How should she have approached it? She should have looked Noah right in the eyes and said, "Okay, so you think it's the vocal minority, and they're…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 01:42 AM
14

Feminists have also fought against egalitarian measures. For example, the abolishment of affirmative action in California was painted as primarily anti-woman in the LA Times. It was vehemently opposes by feminists: Feminist Majority opposed it. Then, just last year, in Florida, powerhouse feminist organization NOW lobbied against another measure. This measure was for shared parenting and the abolishment to permanent alimony. So, feminists fought here to keep men as walking ATM machines. Here is …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 04:50 PM
9

Cassie Jaye's AMA I suggest you read it.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 06:54 PM
2

Prosecutors also say about a tampering with evidence charge that it doesn’t have enough evidence to show Trimble dyed her hair with the intention of hiding from police. Trimble claims she was just a passenger in Chavez’ car at the time of the shooting and was held against her will afterwards. You may be right, but this part stood out to me. Mainly because the "held against her will" part. What do you think? Because I could be wrong...
/r/PussyPass14/10/16 10:58 PM
-3

Really ask yourself if you want to know the answer to that. I highly recommend you just quit now.
/r/PussyPass17/04/16 04:08 AM
8

I'm on the political left, and I can see why people are against abortion. I don't hold this stupid fucking false dichotomy that if you're against abortion, you're a sexist fuck. I get that it makes people sick to think that they can vote on something that goes against their own moral code.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 07:13 AM
6

If only more on the political left understood that.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 04:53 AM
2

The issue I have with your argument is that this is where intersectionality just comes off as finding something to bitch about even if it doesn't effect you. Just my two cents.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 11:39 PM
-3

Does anyone else gap fap to these Judge Judy denying the pussypass videos? No? I'm the only one? K
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/15 02:35 AM
122

You would think a nice swim would go a long ways in taking the sand out of her cunt. Guess not.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/15 08:36 AM
2

I'm such a cunt. Forgive me.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:41 AM
13

Wow... so according to them, it's OK for him to strike another man, but not a woman who just so happened to be the aggressor.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 12:45 AM
2

My recommendation: get a hobby with him. Go to marriage counseling every so often. You want to be the best person in the world for him, I think your key is communication. I also have observed that the more successful marriages were the result of the SO that was not in, had an awesome career about which they were passionate. Communicate is the best advice. Be involved.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 04:17 PM
94

He straight bitch flipped her. Sorry, but once the slaps are thrown, that's it. We need to start instilling into these kids (not just girls) that if you hit someone, you will get hit back.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/15 09:55 PM
2

Ok, so you seem to know what you're talking about. This term I see all the time, and the problem is I get mixed interpretations of it based on the user of the term. Where exactly does the term "rape culture" apply towards? Prisons? Western world? Society? Does it mean that we glorify rape? Seriously, it's shitty that nobody has the same definition for the term.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 09:54 PM
5

Touché.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 12:21 AM
-2

In all fairness, I don't really think that headline is very "oniony."
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:50 PM
1

Voat?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 09:20 PM
3

Do you think the admins would waste their time dealing with such petty matters? I wouldn't even know which admin to message. EDIT: small grammatical error.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 09:11 AM
2

I agree. It's like some people are willing to infringe upon freedom of speech (as a concept) just to pander people they feel are below them. It's a harsh way to look at it, but I think if someone feels like they need to protect their community from a boogeyman, they are the problem. They hold their community members in such little regard, and it's sickening, in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 08:49 AM
3

This is bullshit. People are entitled to voice their opinions where ever they want. If they break the rules of the sub, I understand the actions of the mods in their reaction to ban. I don't post in the Red Pill, but that doesn't mean that there isn't shit in there worth reading. I don't post in the Blue Pill, but that doens't mean I can't benefit from reading what someone has to say. Or asking a user in either of those two subs to elaborate more on the points they are making. I've always held t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 08:41 AM
1

I seriously can't believe what I just read from them. Paging /u/Level100ProtWarrior, you have a claim you've asserted and have yet to deliver. Let's see that malicious quote. Better idea: let's discuss the justification of infringing upon someone else's free speech by breaking the law. Had the MRM movement pulled that kind of shit with feminists, it would have been a shit-frenzy all over. What happened? Nothing. A few million people read about those events, and even fewer gave a shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 07:11 AM
2

Can confirm. Congress sent me to two meaningless wars. They don't give a shit about me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 06:49 AM
3

The Violence Against Women Act? You're against holding rapists accountable for their crimes and protecting victims? The fact that there is a specific law to punish violence against ONLY women, is where the problem lies. Nobody believes rapists shouldn't receive punishment for their crimes. However, this society is quick to not allowing the proper investigation to occur, and throwing out the guy's name and face to the public. And most of the time, it's lost to you that you're denying someone due …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 11:30 PM
2

A woman who genuinely wants to be a stay at home mom is achieving her goals. A woman who picks one career instead of the one she really wants because she believes its the only way she can have a husband and kids is compromising her goals. This happens way more often then you might think - young women compromise their goals because they've been told that if they don't, they won't be able to find a husband or have children or live a full life. If she wants to have a husband and children, obviously…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 11:07 PM
5

You forgot about the part where they will demand to be paid as much as engineers who had to devote countless hours to reading textbooks, working out math and physics problems, rather than spend 20 minutes copying definitions onto flashcards to prepare for multiple-choice exams.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 09:49 PM
2

This is where social attitudes and pressures on women come in. Society uses the biological clock as a weapon against women, pressuring them to spend their early twenties have kids instead of going to school and putting the time into their careers that is necessary in order to advance to the board room/lecture hall/supreme court. Then, again, this is where feminism would come in handy. Start addressing to women at a younger age to focus on an education and get a stable career. Not pissing on a st…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 08:40 PM
8

I think that's an overly simplistic way of looking at things. How so? If the sole movement of feminism was to look at the rights of women vs. the rights of men, and evaluate the shortcomings women face, and correct them, I don't see how I'm oversimplifying anything. I see all the time, feminists argue that definition about bringing women to the equality standards of men. Well, guess what, it has been achieved. To go back to the race example, there are no more laws on the books that prevent black…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 07:48 PM
6

Of course you do. Nobody is arguing the movement hasn't had achievements. So, can you name one right a man has that a woman doesn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 06:47 PM
1

On TiA, they have screenshots of women on Twitter ridiculing it.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 07:54 PM
2

The incident is the latest in a series of similar attacks in the country where groups of women have sexually assaulted men to collect their semen Do I even want to know what these harpies are planning?
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:23 AM
2

I thought there was no quantifiable metric for their sandy cunts.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/15 06:05 AM
1

No link to SRS? I think they're losing their touch.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/15 05:20 AM
2

Hooray for double standards.
/r/PussyPass18/04/15 05:06 AM
1

Burn
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/15 03:45 PM
1

OK, someone used that term on my girlfriend when she said she's not a feminist. I'm pretty sure it means what I think it means.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:50 AM
4

This is not the pussy pass you're looking for. The only thing wrong with this is her taking the board. Not her place, and some smart ass would try to say that's stealing.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/15 04:23 AM
1

Lawyer up. This is all I can really advise because I've never been in this situation.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 08:00 AM
1

Son of a bitch, this damn link isn't working on my phone.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/15 08:22 PM
3

Have your dad read "No More Mr. Nice Guy." Your dad needs to start doing stuff for himself, and not waste time trying to gain acceptance through covert contracts. It's a great book.
/r/askTRP16/02/15 06:41 AM
1

That's fucking stupid. I wouldn't believe it, if I didn't watch the video.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:38 AM
1

I'm just wondering how recent this was.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/15 08:14 PM
3

You know, it didn't even dawn on me to switch the roles for this one. Yeah, some guy would be catching a lot of shit
/r/PussyPass05/02/15 03:21 PM
2

I had a similar situation. Girl went around saying she kicked my ass in fifth grade, when I encountered her at a new high school. The reality, she and two guys and another girl were bullying me. I ended punching one of the guys in the face when they stepped to me. I then got my ass beat.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/15 03:11 PM
1

Sorry, I posted it on TIL.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 06:24 PM
3

I tried to post about the ban on paternity tests in France. I used the link that was cited in Wikipedia with the entire phrasing from Wikipedia. It was removed.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 08:40 AM
-1

I'm trying to find an article where it said she spit on him and grabbed his neck while he was driving the bus.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/15 06:16 PM
15

What. The. Fuck?!
/r/PussyPass10/01/15 03:58 AM
2

When I was brought in to speak to the 1SG and the commander, the NCO that he talked to, another Soldier, CJ himself, and my squad leader, accompanied me. When they sat us all down, I was allowed to voice my thoughts because the 1SG had never seen an E4 talk to an E6 like that. This 1SG didn't even know my name, that's how under-the-radar I was as a Soldier. I was removed from the platoon and placed on TOC duties for the remainder of the deployment. They felt I had gone through enough. They had m…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 06:56 AM
3

To be honest, the reason I didn't file a complaint is the same reason a lot of Soldiers don't seek help for their emotional problems; I didn't want to seem like a wimp because I wanted to fit in with the rest of the tough guys. Being that it was a combat MOS, for whatever reason, they hold us to be "the emotionally invulnerable" or else you're shit. I know in my unit, if you were hurt, you were a piece of shit if you got a profile. If you filed complaints, you were a pussy and were bullied to no…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 06:42 PM
3

This was in 2011. I'm out of the Army. Thanks, though.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 06:17 AM
8

When I was in, I had started to eradicate my use of the word "faggot" when my sister came out. My sister commented on one of my posts on Facebook right after my NCO, when I was in Afghanistan, and my NCO posted about how much of an abomination gay people (using the derogatory term) are on his own timeline. I commented on the post telling him that his bigotry is the very same type that his parents [he was black] experienced. He told me to "STFU" and went about telling me to mind my own business. …
/r/MensRights02/01/15 05:23 AM
1

I've only been seeing this term floating around in the past few months. I seriously want to know what the fuck it is too.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 08:26 AM
33

I found this in /r/videos. Apparently the misleading title by the OP, fucked me. Let me clarify my fuck up. You can read here The Fort Collins woman told police in November that Dustin Toth, then 25, had kidnapped her from the Windsor Safeway parking lot, and drugged and raped her at knifepoint at his nearby home before she was able to run from the house. Toth was arrested, but the case against him was quickly dropped when police discovered Bennett had fabricated the entire story. As for the wom…
/r/PussyPass27/12/14 08:55 AM
4

I would have chosen jail. In all seriousness, had this been a guy even blocking the door, a shit frenzy would have erupted.
/r/PussyPass23/12/14 04:57 PM
2

I had to comment on her Facebook page. I went against the grain. I took bits from here, but I threw in some comments of my own to try and point out how oblivious she is that what she said was essentially a hasty generalization. I don't think it will do shit, but whatever.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 06:47 PM
1

When I was stationed in Colorado back in my Army days, we were informed that they never established at what point during when someone was drinking, where consent could no longer be considered consent. In other words, they could take one drink of the first drink, and they could say they were impaired.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 09:54 AM
2

Ok, I see both sides of the argument here. This is definitely an example of the pussy pass. Had it been a guy for whom the officer bought the eggs, would the same result have occurred? Who knows? Did she steal? Damn right. I'm honestly conflicted on whether or not she should have been punished. My grandma was put in the same situation right after her first husband died, so my mom and her sisters were who she was looking out for. She was caught, but the store clerk bought her the bread and bologn…
/r/PussyPass11/12/14 01:28 AM
-1

Looked like he hit her with an object, but then again, I'm on my phone.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/12/14 04:29 AM
58

She can't say a guy has never swept he off her feet.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/12/14 04:15 AM
1

What did he hit her with?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/12/14 04:07 AM
17

Hahahhahahhaha!!!! I'm sorry! I lost it at the rats part. My post is not going to contribute much to this thread other than laughter. I tend to lurk in this sub, but wow. This is just what I needed. Edit: autocorrect fisted me again.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 08:58 AM
5

Never in my life, have I seen a major shit-storm erupt over something so inane.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/14 08:27 AM
1

Comments are disabled for the video. It's rather difficult to tell if it's satire.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 09:46 PM
0

Replace "men" with "cunty feminazis" and it works too.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 12:35 AM
38

When I was in the military, I watched a woman almost destroy a Soldier's life. She didn't want to be seen as a ho within her social circle after she took this Soldier home.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:30 AM
1

I don't really post much in this sub much because the mods advise that we who are new try to learn before posting, but it's interesting to refresh /r/todayilearned/ every couple of minutes and see the number of subscribers decrease. I saw this post when it was first posted the other day. I read the study, and showed it to my old sociology teacher (her and I still keep in touch). She had seen it before and agreed that it was interesting. Is it really so hard to believe though for all those people…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 05:48 AM
3

I see. That makes sense. I appreciate you taking the time to elaborate.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 06:36 PM
69

Investigators tested her but found no physical evidence of rape, Brooks said. Can someone perhaps explain to me how the trial could have went further without this kind of evidence? Is it due to the fact that she could have told the authorities she showered?
/r/MensRights17/10/14 10:12 AM
1

Thanks for clearing that up.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 08:23 PM
2

I've never really commented on this sub, but isn't there a time limit as to how long a prenuptual agreement is valid? Potential stupid question, be legalities aren't my forte.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 08:17 PM
0

Women's studies classes.
/r/seduction26/09/14 06:35 AM
8

Just get a large, Farva. Sorry, I couldn't resist.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 09:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter