TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

J_r_s Archive

View 7 posts and 407 comments by J_r_s on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

They deleted their account before anyone could ask. The only way to validate the claim would require an admin to examine the account. They had deleted their account even before I suggested they send a message to the mods.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:38 PM
3

Report these threats to the mods, this action is not tolerated.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 03:47 PM
2

Do some volunteer work at food pantries, homeless shelters or something else like habitat for humanity.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 03:26 PM
1

Yeah I reviewed a lot of those sites back when I put together the support wiki. Some are helpful, some are not, and some could be considered harmful. One thing that did surprise me was this blogpost I found while reviewing The Hotline again. http://www.thehotline.org/2014/07/men-can-be-victims-of-abuse-too/ Edit: Feel free to make suggestions on what should be added to the wiki.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 03:07 AM
7

We've done this countless times before, most vocally during the USCB shooting, commonly known as the Elliot Rodger rampage. People who already hold a bias against us won't change their mind about us despite however much we would like them to.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 12:48 AM
2

And it looks like AMR is already trying to get their hands on the sub, what a surprise.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 11:50 PM
1

put http:// in front of np.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:34 PM
4

I thought you had a good idea when you made that post, I was actually looking forward to you making it a regular thing and I was disappointed it did not become a regular event. Perseverance in the face of apathy or however it goes, with time I think more people would get involved.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 05:05 AM
2

You should read tallwheel's comment again, their comment has zilch in common with your last paragraph.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:10 AM
1

I'm sorry but it is incorrect to say that Al Jazeera has not reported on Boko Haram's actions against men, women and children before. Here are some such articles: Abduction http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2014/06/scores-abducted-northeast-nigeria-2014624103134503699.html General Violence http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2014/02/students-killed-nigeria-school-attack-2014225111212151892.html http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2013/07/201376103410707610.html http://www.aljazeera.com/news…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:13 PM
1

I don't have any problem with the kidnapped girls being included, however the author of the article does not mention any of the earlier instances of Boko Haram's violence against men that Al Jazeera and other organizations have covered. I see that as a failure and missed opportunity on the authors part to show that Boko Haram has a history of violence against men, women and children.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:51 PM
2

This reads like a new incident yet they fail to mention Boko Haram's earlier actions against men, instead they chose to use the kidnapped girls incident. Why not both? The kidnappings come four months after Boko Haram, which is fighting to reinstate a medieval Islamic caliphate in religiously mixed Nigeria, abducted more than 200 schoolgirls from the village of Chibok.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:03 PM
2

I think there are bigger issues facing men that we could be speculating on rather than what the world would be like under somebody's rule. I doubt that what she wants is any different than things that feminists already have or are trying to get.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 05:53 PM
3

I absolutely hear you. I'm lucky enough to have not taken part in one so really all I can do is wish you well with getting out. Hopefully with all of the recent exposure revealing female culpability in IPV, programs like BIP and the organizations that push them will come under harsher scrutiny.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:58 AM
2

You know what grinds my gears? BIP. Here are a few links for you related to BIP if you were unaware of them. Also I really enjoy how you've answered the questions. I would at least include a statement for no. 9 how the majority of rapists of men and women are a male or female acquaintance. http://www.vawnet.org/domestic-violence/intervention.php?filterby=Batterers http://www.stopvaw.org/Effectiveness_of_Batterers_Intervention_Programs.html http://www.stopvaw.org/Research_and_Reports_by_Topic2.ht…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:13 AM
8

This has to be a troll account. 6 months old, 2 comments, already at least -100 karma.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:40 AM
71

For the life of me I thought a bunch of college students did this.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 05:42 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/support#wiki_suicide_prevention
/r/MensRights12/08/14 12:56 AM
1

Please don't conflate feminism with women. Being anti-feminist does not mean the MRM wants to hate or control women.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 11:35 PM
5

Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:08 AM
3

Can anyone give a quick rundown of the article? For whatever reason the web page will not open for me.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:20 AM
1

If that's the case Talktalk probably has it blacklisted as a site that promotes one of the following: http://help2.talktalk.co.uk/homesafe-about-kids-safe It's not the first time people have attempted to blacklist websites related to men's rights groups before either in case you were curious. http://community.norton.com/t5/Other-Norton-Products/Norton-DNS-defaming-numerous-human-rights-sites-blocking-them-by/td-p/905519 You may want to test whether it is being intentionally blacklisted or not by…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:28 PM
-1

I don't, I don't know why people are trying to make it seem like I care so much about it. If you've been a member of the MR sub long enough this is not news. People have talked about SRS and SJWs taking over subs for years. If you only learned this today, maybe I should have started with stating that in my first comment.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:51 PM
-1

Yep, reddit request is typically used for dead subs. However last month when it was brought to attention someone was attempting to obtain the sub /r/malerights, people were quick to act to stop it. There are much easier ways to hijack a sub than going through the main sub.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:38 PM
-3

Or I could just be a normal guy that doesn't like to see rampant paranoia flounder about.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:22 PM
-2

Have you noticed anyone making requests to get in on the mod team?
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:39 PM
-2

If you look at /r/redditrequest's guidelines, you'll notice your fear is groundless.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:00 PM
3

There is a difference between not wanting to pay child support and wanting to see the current child support and custody system to go under revision. The majority here seek the latter. If you haven't yet looked, please look through our subs FAQs, wiki and sidebar for more information that may address any misconceptions you may have.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:27 PM
10

We desire bodily autonomy for all individuals. If an adult so chooses to become circumcised for religious reasons or whatever, that's their right as an adult What we are opposed to is imposing an unnecessary medical procedure on children.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:03 AM
1

I can't tell if this is bashing MRAs or feminists...
/r/MensRights30/07/14 02:56 PM
1

No problem.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 04:32 AM
2

Have you been exposed to /r/femradebates yet? I think that's what you're looking for.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 04:05 AM
3

Take whatever advice that guy says with a grain of salt, I'm fairly certain they have no idea what they're talking about.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:44 AM
1

http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=41736 for the unaware.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:06 AM
2

For more formatting tricks you can click on "Formatting Help" at the bottom right of a new post or comment space. It does not take you away from the screen you're viewing.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 02:24 PM
2

It looks like part of your story got caught up in Reddit's formatting tricks. When you use **asterisks in your text, if not spaced properly it becomes bold**. Instead of using asterisks to block out your ex's name, just say your ex or abuser.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 01:40 PM
3

You can keep the university's name, however the names of individuals must be removed. Other than that you should be fine. (Although you may want to consider throwing some paragraph breaks in your story to make it easier to read. Just hit enter/return twice between paragraphs.)
/r/MensRights28/07/14 01:02 PM
3

Because with the information you've supplied, someone could attempt to look for those individuals in real life, and that is a violation of the subs rules.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 12:45 PM
2

I'll send you a pm.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:33 AM
3

Pierce is a redditor that writes about people who have been wrongfully accused. COTWA hosts a number of articles written by him and resource links for people that find themselves in the position of being falsely accused and to groups raising awareness of the issue. As someone that was accused of beating my ex, by her friend, I just want to convey my sympathy to you and can probably relate to some of what you're going through. (As for the AMR bit, they tend to make light of the issue.)
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:28 AM
1

Just for future reference our wiki has suicide hotlines: http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/support I strongly encourage it's use.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 06:24 AM
2

I wonder if Pierce saw this, they run the blog COTWA and I guess it just tickled my funny bone that an AMR did this.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 06:05 AM
1

It's spam, just report it.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 02:13 AM
2

I think they're just referring to the third party who decided to harass him.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 08:17 PM
1

If there's one thing I'm happy about is that the NIJ recommends that more research into abusive women is needed.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:56 AM
2

Another topic to look into would be what is being done about batterer intervention programs given that studies have shown them to be ineffective at their intended goals (thereby harming women). http://www.nij.gov/topics/crime/intimate-partner-violence/interventions/pages/batterer-intervention.aspx http://www.stopvaw.org/History_and_Theories_of_Batterers_Intervention_Programs_in_the_USA.html http://www.stopvaw.org/united_states_standards_for_batterers_intervention_programs.html http://www.stopvaw…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:06 AM
1

OP, here are just a few things for you to look into given your circumstances: https://www.211texas.org/cms/ https://www.211texas.org/cms/search-housing-shelter-services-in-texas https://www.211texas.org/cms/search-financial-legal-services-in-texas https://www.211texas.org/zf/taxonomy/detail/id/645991/ Also you may wish to share your circumstances in /r/legaladvice as well.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 11:05 PM
1

I really wish I noticed my comments were not being restored after changing my links to np sooner. OP: When you notice cases like that, contact the admins. I've been noticing a lot of users from SRD as of late.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:39 PM
1

When you notice cases like that, contact the admins. I've been noticing a lot of users from SRD as of late.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:32 PM
45

Here's a checklist of things you may want to consider starting: http://www.shrink4men.com/2010/10/27/leaving-an-abusive-wife-pre-divorce-checklist/
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:44 PM
2

Well if you look at his post history he covers it pretty well in this post. http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/26xuw4/dealing_with_life_as_someone_newly_exposed_to_the/
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:12 PM
5

That's a really fucked up thing to say you know. Do you think gay people are mentally ill too?
/r/MensRights17/07/14 09:43 PM
1

Thank you for expanding the explanation.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:53 PM
3

The way I understand cis is cis refers to having chromosomes XY or XX and identifying as male or female respectively. Non-cis refers to having chromosomes XY or XX and identifying as the opposite gender or choosing to be non-gendered. It's a label meant to make it easier for transgender folk to explain why they choose an identity that sways away from their chromosomes. Of course it's not a subject that I am used to frequently discussing so I may be wrong (or horribly wrong) about the issue. I ju…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:58 PM
7

I have to say after putting together the wiki for support groups/services I'm not surprised. http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/support A lot of places don't have material for male victims, the NDV Hotline is a good example. http://www.thehotline.org/help/resources/#tab-id-6
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:35 PM
2

Here's a link to a description of our flairs, pick the one you think's best: http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/flair :)
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:52 PM
8

Meh, currently Men's Rights is being linked on SRD, I just like to think it's spillover from them.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:49 PM
13

You can't know unless you try.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:44 PM
10

Yep, I agree. I was responding to the second part of your comment so I hope you are agreeing with me as well. :)
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:42 PM
43

Op's response in AskMen: Cancel that appointment. I already tried. She called the office back and reconfirmed the appointment, and told them I was not allowed to cancel it. Very questionable. http://np.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/2ay9og/wife_trying_to_have_our_14yearold_son_circumcised/cizxjnr
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:34 PM
-1

Has it really been only a day? Feels like it's been a week now.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:06 AM
2

I'm full on okay with most rants, I usually leave an encouraging comment, I'm actually surprised my comments doing as well as it is. To the OP: It's common for both men and women to have these things in their profiles, so it's not just you. Women have the same complaints of men in the dating scene.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 10:44 PM
10

I think you need to take a step back, take a breather, and think if this was the correct sub for this post. Men's Rights is not a dating advice sub to bash on women's expectations or claims in the dating sphere. Edit: OP, It's common for both men and women to have these things in their profiles, so it's not just you. Women have the same complaints of men in the dating scene.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 10:16 PM
1

No thanks.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 05:33 PM
3

They really do need to work on acknowledging more male victims: http://www.thehotline.org/help/resources/#tab-id-6
/r/MensRights16/07/14 04:26 AM
1

:/ Welcome to gender politics. If you're new to the MRM please take some time to browse our sidebar and wiki for a lot of frequently asked questions and the like. You're welcomed to post and contribute as you like as long as it doesn't violate any of Reddit's or our subs's rules. Due to our mod policy on censorship most opinions and content are community regulated so most bigoted content is down-voted and troll posts removed. Other forums you may be interested in checking out are listed on the s…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 03:47 AM
3

You know, I think this was a whoosh moment for me and didn't stop to think you were being sarcastic, but for all those unaware viewers out there Banned from Feminism posts have been in this sub for a long, long time.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 01:58 AM
14

/r/mensrants exists, more people need to use it. >.>
/r/MensRights16/07/14 01:49 AM
1

It's not, the person's a troll who chooses to ignore information that contradicts their views.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 01:14 AM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 12:57 AM
1

Check out my edit as well, I'm not sure if you saw it beforehand.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 12:53 AM
2

/r/femradebates, not really a feminist hangout, but it's a space where MRAs and feminists can hash things out. Edit: And by hash things out I mean check out the subs rules and previous posts for patterns on how debate and dialogue work. It is not a place for people to take out their aggressions on the other ideology.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 12:46 AM
2

You may want to try posting to /r/askfeminists instead of /r/feminism, unless the mods of those subs got ban happy and preemptively banned you for your post to /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 10:01 PM
1

Just a heads up, GWW is Karen Straughan.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 07:14 PM
1

Your post seems to imply that there is uniform agreement within the MRM that all non-custodial moms are unsuitable. This is a false assumption as the MRM is comprised of many people with differing opinions. We are allowed to openly agree or disagree with other members who may hold an opinion that differs from our own, and it is encouraged that MRAs take on individual activism as part of other groups. There is no expectation that MRAs are only allowed to be MRAs. Would you be interested in postin…
/r/MensRights15/07/14 06:31 PM
1

Thank you for the sympathy. I wish I could say that I've put it behind me but I still continue to see a counselor and take anti-depressants. I tried to convince her to stay but it was an issue in our relationship where she felt that it was her fault whenever something bad happened. Wherever she is now and whatever she's doing with her life, I hope she's finally been able to find happiness and stop blaming herself. And the same goes to our kids, I hope they're safe, happy and don't blame their mo…
/r/MensRights15/07/14 05:43 PM
2

You are throwing up a strawman argument here.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 06:17 AM
2

I had kids at one time until their mother vanished from my life. I had just recently injured my back at the time as well, a shortened disk-space, that I had sustained from landscaping. Before I had it treated I had fears if I would be able to walk again because of how excruciating the pain was just to move. Thankfully the pain from the injury is largely gone now although it resurfaces from time to time. Anyways on top of being freshly abandoned and effectively crippled, I had to deal with rumors…
/r/MensRights15/07/14 06:15 AM
0

I think non-custodial moms and dads face equal amounts of societal disapproval. That is why we have a focus on joint-custody rights. If you think non-custodial dad's don't share some of the same issues non-custodial moms do, you're not looking hard enough.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:56 AM
1

How did you obtain the NISVS response? Did I overlook something on the page you linked to?
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:40 AM
1

Much easier to read now.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:09 AM
2

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2011/0603/Political-misquotes-The-10-most-famous-things-never-actually-said/First-they-ignore-you.-Then-they-laugh-at-you.-Then-they-attack-you.-Then-you-win.-Mohandas-Gandhi
/r/MensRights15/07/14 01:40 AM
8

If this is what I think it is, it is about the recent decision in India to stop arresting men and their entire families when accused by an ex-wife without first performing an investigation. There was a noticeable trend some women were abusing the law to get back at their ex-husband and their family. http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=41736 http://www.saveindianfamily.org/ Edit: To clarify the law in question involves Dowry Laws. Edit2: Read /u/mzpq's comment for a more detailed…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 09:17 PM
1

I'm not quite sure.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 06:36 PM
1

I hope this answers some questions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_the_Palestinian_territories
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:37 PM
3

In regards to your edit it may simply be bad timing, there were 5(?) other posts made today like yours, 3 of which happened in a row (including yours.) Today was a rather busy day for our sub as many people who are not regular members here decided to take part in various sometimes inflaming discussions.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:12 PM
3

Take a look through these sometime. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=Why+are+you+an+MRA&restrict_sr=on
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:58 PM
9

Men should have the right to alternatives other than abortion in cases where pregnancy has occurred. Forcing a woman to have an abortion against their will is not desired.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:52 PM
8

If they say they have sufficient evidence to prosecute the person, I hope they do so. I also fail to see how this is relevant to the MRM.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:36 PM
2

OP you need to change your link to cmv to np. (www to np)
/r/MensRights13/07/14 09:56 PM
5

Uh, what?
/r/MensRights13/07/14 09:22 PM
2

Nice find.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:12 PM
5

Creating new buzzwords will not attract new or rational people. It will have the same effect the word "mansplain" already does at offending people. If someone claims for you to be "mansplaining" just stick to saying they are derailing the argument or comment at hand. There is no need to create new one-liners. Edit: /u/Karissa36 explained what I wanted to get across much better than myself. Their comment: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2akxsw/feelsplaining/ciw97sq
/r/MensRights13/07/14 03:05 PM
1

If that's so thanks for clarifying.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 12:48 PM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consent_decree
/r/MensRights13/07/14 03:48 AM
1

It would seem that you've set out to tackle quite the monster to prove and I'll admit that I share a great deal in common with your personal account, so much so that I've had to rewrite this comment more than a dozen times before simply giving up. :) Good luck to you in your endeavor.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:01 AM
1

Neat. How many results did you get?
/r/MensRights13/07/14 01:05 AM
1

It was an interesting read, how did you come across it?
/r/MensRights13/07/14 12:55 AM
4

Yeah, this part of the article is especially depressing. He said D.B., now 9, "is doing well, but he's scarred for life" by the experience of being investigated and made the subject of a juvenile petition claiming he had committed first-degree sexual assault of a child. I hope this kid won't have to go through anything like that again.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 12:50 AM
12

Um, the boy had it dismissed already, I believe... http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/court-rejects-suit-in-sex-assault-case-involving-wisconsin-boy-6-b9967916z1-218169441.html?ipad=y
/r/MensRights13/07/14 12:38 AM
2

When you make claims such as these, please provide sources with them. Many people would like the chance to look at the raw data as well. The best fact-based statements are the ones that have sources (that is not to say all sources are good sources.) Edit: this isn't an attack on your claim, I think I may have written my comment poorly.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 02:32 PM
5

You should consider posting this in other men related subs as well.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 02:15 PM
2

Tell me about it.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:11 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/support
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:35 PM
2

Now we're just waiting on RAINN to follow-through with their promised revisions as well.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 06:34 AM
2

Well, have you tried our wiki or the info in the sidebar yet?
/r/MensRights11/07/14 06:19 AM
2

Read the last paragraph in the bottom of the post, some conspiracy-nut was pushing wild theories about why we sticky Honey Badger Radio, basically.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 06:16 AM
1

Please post this to r/mensrants...
/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:42 AM
1

That's very true. You will also find that our sub has a very, very diverse user-base, the old vocal minority vs. the silent majority dynamic if you would.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:54 AM
3

It's not a problem, actually my favorite posts are usually discussions involving people newly exposed to Men's Rights trying to figure out what we are about and why we have such a terrible reputation.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:31 AM
7

Please do a quick check for "As a woman" or "I'm a woman" posts in our sub. They are often well-received and highly upvoted.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:18 AM
1

K, leaving the scene now...
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:57 AM
1

Shit, sorry you went through that man.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:48 AM
1

Just to be clear was that your personal experience in all seriousness?
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:39 AM
6

I don't think they were included in the analysis either. The following is the data they used in their analysis, 0 hits for feminism. http://blog.getredditalerts.com/datasets/sentiment/subreddit-polarity.csv
/r/MensRights10/07/14 10:41 PM
7

Worldnews and MensRights on the list makes sense, they deal with controversial subjects likely to incite rage and anger.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 10:28 PM
2

I can't take credit for the MSN, that was started by /u/jcea. It was a huge coincidence that we started both of these projects at the same time. I was lucky enough to be invited to the MSN after jcea saw my work with the wiki.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 10:21 PM
3

Actually in this case the OP might be better posting this to 2xc since they're asking for advice on how to deal with their mother. They may get some conflicting advice there but this is neither a rant nor a men's rights issue. :/
/r/MensRights10/07/14 05:26 AM
2

Please read rule 1 of our sidebar.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 02:06 AM
0

I read the AMA and I said in my post above: I may be a little sour with how often people from 4chan, AMR, SRS or any other site that likes to troll us do so; so if you're legit, more power to you. I think you read too much into my comment.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:46 AM
0

No offense but plenty of people before you have made detailed stories about how they've witnessed feminists acting terribly. Sometimes these stories are legit but other times they are often so well constructed that they just aren't believable without some verification. I may be a little sour with how often people from 4chan, AMR, SRS or any other site that likes to troll us do so; so if you're legit, more power to you. Maybe you should consider writing a book about your experience someday? I'm s…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:29 AM
1

I wouldn't be surprised if the OP is an AMR.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 03:01 PM
2

Dated Nov 4... Seems to be reaching.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:05 AM
1

Glad to help.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 03:15 AM
6

Get involved with volunteer work at homeless shelters or other outreach programs that help others.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 02:47 AM
1

I think this ties in well with an idea I posted on our meta sub: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta/comments/2a0jb0/any_thoughts_on_implementing_a_deltalike_bot_to/ If we could somehow implement this we would be able to keep track of and to continue the discussions on these issues.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:40 AM
1

Well considering a botched operation can cause dismemberment and fatality I'd say it's pretty serious. /r/Inactivists is dedicated to the issue.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 04:37 AM
7

...at the bottom of that image is a link to a group that likes to troll us constantly. That's all it is, a troll image. The typical knee-jerk reaction is to report it when it surfaces.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 04:01 AM
1

Actually I think I copied the wrong link, in the link itself change the 2 to 4 to reach the correct section.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 02:38 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/support#wiki_uk2
/r/MensRights05/07/14 02:26 PM
1

Huh, weird. Well the link to their wiki still works.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 02:25 AM
1

Asterisks at the beginning and end of sentences will cause them to italicize, just an FYI.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 02:05 AM
1

Ooohhh... Also btw welcome to Men's Rights. :) I has taken a look at your post history before and saw you posted to places /r/feminism and /r/askfeminists, and just made a poor assumption. My apologies.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:55 AM
2

It's certainly possible, however there are just as many male and female victims of rape who don't make the news that aren't coached on what to call themselves. They just pick the word that feels right for them.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:24 AM
2

People refer to themselves as survivors all the time. My ex, who had been raped in the past, said that by calling herself a survivor she was empowering herself to move beyond the traumatic incident the rape had on her. If she thought of herself as a victim, she felt powerless. But even though she said that she had moved past her rape, she still suffered from occasional night terrors and PTSD due to it.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:03 AM
1

"Survivor" in this case refers to living through hardship. Dictionary.com defines a survivor as one who has: noun A person or thing that survives. Law. the one of two or more designated persons, as joint tenants or others having a joint interest, who outlives the other or others. A person who continues to function or prosper in spite of opposition, hardship, or setbacks. Origin: 1495–1505; survive + -or2
/r/MensRights30/06/14 10:34 PM
2

Just a heads up, here in men's rights, everyone is entitled to voice their opinion even if it is a voice of dissent. This sub's full of people who experienced frequent censoring on the fem subs and did not like it. The only way your post would be removed is if it violated the subs rules.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 07:44 PM
1

Oh, I forgot to plug /r/femradebates for you, I'm not sure how often that gets mentioned in fem circles.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:14 AM
1

Just keep in mind that its only one small example, there are many other ways to accomplish the deed.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:22 AM
7

I'm going to request this gets stickied.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:13 AM
1

Here's a powerful piece I found earlier. http://np.reddit.com/r/news/comments/29e0wm/women_are_more_likely_to_be_verbally_and/cik1mp6
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:06 AM
7

1-Day old account talking about a 7-month old post, not sure who to trust. I'd rather give OP the benefit of the doubt and be disappointed, than chase somebody off for wanting to discuss things.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 03:48 AM
3

Yep, that's pretty much it. Stay as long as you like, don't let anybody get to you. Just approach things with an open mind. ;)
/r/MensRights30/06/14 03:40 AM
8

Please ignore the rudeness of some of our commentators, it's not encouraged for the most part. If you haven't looked through our sidebar or wiki yet, please do.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 03:15 AM
1

Please change the www in the body of your text to np to comply with the subs rules.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 02:44 AM
1

Any input is appreciated, feel free to take a look at our sub and the wiki and you can message us at http://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FMaleSupportNetwork if you see anything we can improve on. Everything's basically a work in progress and the more feedback we get the better we can help others.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 12:10 AM
1

Alright, well good luck with your experiment whatever it's objectives may be. Maybe one of our better contributors will be able to give you more info. P.s. The support group wiki is about two weeks old, the old one hadn't been updated in two years and I'm filling it in in my spare time.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 11:01 PM
1

So then you've also explored this section of the FAQs and its further readings? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq#wiki_7._what_are_the_focal_topics_of_the_mrm.3F
/r/MensRights29/06/14 10:39 PM
1

You're technically correct, there is no direct connection other than that they are groups for men. However on another note have you looked at the related subreddit's in the sidebar for studies?
/r/MensRights29/06/14 10:27 PM
2

When you submitted your link originally, if it was to another sub on reddit replacing the www. part of the link with np is supposed to deter people from commenting or down voting in the sub you linked to. It's what we call a measure against brigading.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:09 PM
2

When linking to other subs please use np. in place of www.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:01 PM
2

You're right, I probably could have clarified what I said better. I did not intend to make it sound like we support discrimination against women but I wanted to make a point that we do not make a point of defining what makes a man a man.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 07:21 PM
-4

I understand the logic in your argument, I just wasn't aware if you had done it on purpose or not. I felt that stepping in to ask was the right thing to do in case you had not meant to.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:44 PM
-15

Is that the comment you really want to make??
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:10 PM
3

We don't discriminate, all it takes is for someone to identify as a man. Even though we're a really new sub we've had a f-t-m man post asking for advice and support and our community was there for them. I've been planning on asking the trans community for ideas and advice on how to make the wiki better, but I wasn't sure where the largest community was yet. Edit: I just wanted to add that the wiki is also useful for people with identity issues, if someone is a man and wants to identify as a woma…
/r/MensRights29/06/14 01:50 PM
2

As usual.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 05:23 AM
4

It looks like your comment may have been removed from /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 04:36 AM
3

Reddit hug of death?
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:46 AM
1

You could suggest the idea at /r/mensrightsmeta, on the other hand I got involved with the MR support group wiki after pointing out how old and inaccessible the old system was just by making a self-post on this sub.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:44 AM
0

I would say similar yet not similar, RAINNs position on male victims seems to focus on male-on-male violence. Hopefully that will change as more surveys are conducted identifying women as capable of assaulting men. https://rainn.org/get-information/types-of-sexual-assault/male-sexual-assault https://rainn.org/get-information/types-of-sexual-assault/definition-of-rape
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:15 PM
1

I'm glad you had the chance to forgive your father for events beyond his control.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 05:17 PM
1

Sadly that's an all too familiar tale. Are you familiar at all with Erin Pizzey? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Erin_Pizzey
/r/MensRights28/06/14 05:00 PM
0

Thanks for the insight tallwheel.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:33 PM
4

I recognize that, I just want our other members to keep the safety of our sub in mind as well.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:26 PM
9

Please do not participate in brigading the linked thread. Message the moderators or make a separate request for ownership and make your case.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:18 PM
3

Female-on-male rape is a larger problem than people are aware of primarily due to social acceptance of it. Just look at cases involving teacher-student "relationships" or an older woman with a young teen. While the female perpetrator may receive some backlash if their crime is made known to the public, they often receive a lighter sentence than men who committed the same crime. The male victim on the other hand is often told how lucky they were to have sex, regardless of whether or not they want…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:56 PM
2

Yeah but not sure what that has to do with anything, could you explain? Men and women can both be molested, it's not a gendered problem.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:38 PM
2

Consent should be taught to both boys and girls and have them understand personal accountability in regards to sexual activity. So instead of teaching just boys not to rape, we teach boys and girls what rape is and that both are as capable of being victims as well as perpetrators.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 02:12 PM
3

/r/Inactivists will provide some invaluable insight but can be hard for a first time browser to digest. They are a sub dedicated to exposing horrors of circumcision. http://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/wiki/index#wiki_.2Fr.2Fintactivists.2Fwiki
/r/MensRights28/06/14 02:04 PM
2

Good job posting this, adding Sudbury Counseling to the local sexual violence wiki.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:30 PM
3

If that's the case stop engaging the person and block them. http://www.imdb.com/help/show_leaf?boardsignore&ref_=hlp_brws
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:34 AM
1

I thought I was pointing out that they had not modified the terms since their last survey since these were the same terms they used the last time the survey was conducted, although I could be mistaken about that. I probably should have provided a longer comment originally going into this fact, I just made the assumption it was common knowledge already. But what you said about this being a survey and not a legal document is true and I agree with it.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:29 AM
2

It was at this point that I got molested at the Men’s Rights conference. An older man came up to me and immediately complimented my hairy arms (a first). He then started telling me all this crazy shit about how he was from California and he makes movies and he wants to take me to Malibu. Regardless of sexual orientation, it was pretty weird. People started filling up the seats around us and I didn’t want to make a scene, so I just politely accepted the compliment and tried to deflect. The dude k…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 02:28 AM
3

If you feel they are harassing you why don't you report them or ignore them? http://www.imdb.com/help/show_article?boardstc
/r/MensRights28/06/14 02:23 AM
2

Try /r/femradebates for a more reasonable conversation... Just read their sidebar or converse with their mods first to comply with their subs rules.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:24 AM
1

All Facebook names must be removed.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:20 PM
1

Actually it's rather enjoyable when women come here in good faith to discuss such subjects. And thank you for not associating our sub with TRP as we call it.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:56 PM
3

Can you give context for this statement: [–]insatiable_whore 1 point 9 days ago if we wanted to hear about the man's plight I'd go to /r/theredpill. Your post seems disingenuous especially when you claim money is no object.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:44 PM
1

Thanks, it's appreciated.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 09:33 PM
1

We're approaching our character limit on the sidebar but we're willing to listen to any suggestions you may have on how we can clarify some things.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 09:09 PM
1

That sounds a lot like our "Need an Ear" flair but I can bring it up with the other mods and get some discussion going on it.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 08:07 PM
1

Not a problem, it's a fairly new sub.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 08:05 PM
1

/r/malesupportnetwork?
/r/MensRights27/06/14 07:39 PM
1

You mean /r/mensrants?
/r/MensRights27/06/14 07:21 PM
6

http://feminist.org/nomoreexcuses/rapeisrape.asp Edit: Don't downvote ignorance, educate... Politely.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 06:54 PM
1

I noticed a 30 second delay between pressing play and the audio starting maybe that's happening in your case as well.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 06:44 PM
3

Please don't feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 06:41 PM
6

Mary P. Koss http://www.genderratic.com/p/2551/male-privilege-defining-male-victims-out-of-existence/
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:42 PM
2

What kind of information would you like explained?
/r/MensRights27/06/14 03:27 PM
3

That definition sees being made to penetrate as a sexual assault, not rape. From the section just above: Among (victim) men, rape includes oral or anal penetration by a male using his penis. It also includes anal penetration by a male or female using their fingers or an object.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 01:37 PM
2

I see, well good luck.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:33 PM
3

Fair warning to you, many people in our movement are former feminists who spent more than a few years in that movement before jumping ship.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:17 PM
2

I think you responded to the wrong comment... You replied to yourself, unless you were just adding onto your original statement.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:11 PM
1

And what direction do you want this post to go? There's no context here other than your title.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 08:17 PM
6

Right, right, right... You're /u/bittch alt account it appears and being censored in 2x does not automatically make this a Men's Rights issue.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:40 PM
5

Lets stay away from generalized statements like that, it's way more complicated than that.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:52 AM
4

A good place to start looking for information would be in our sidebar, there is a lot of helpful information there to answer any immediate questions you might have about our group. If you've already done that, we can answer more specific questions you may have.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:42 AM
2

It was not our intended desire to suggest that the OP was not welcome to post, however considering the OP's knowledge of MRA material we just wanted to ensure a mod was fully available to talk with them about their issues and to monitor the thread in case the OP came under attack. Our desire is not to create a battleground for people of differing ideologies but to create a safe place where a man can feel comfortable talking about their personal issues when they just need someone to talk to witho…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:28 AM
-2

I could have phrased what I said better, the idea is not wrong and you haven't violated any rules that I'm aware of but the subject line of your e-mail doesn't provide information regarding the ad in question. If someone just sends an e-mail titled "Your Bigot Ad", does it sound like it comes from someone seriously concerned or a troll? There's not enough information to act on or for someone to take it seriously.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 02:26 AM
0

This sounds like a bad plan and could lead to trouble for our sub, I recommend against it.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 01:40 AM
2

Sigh... I really don't want to know.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:49 PM
2

4 men, 3 guys in an apartment and one waiting for a sandwich.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:47 PM
1

They are a frequent poster to whiterights, their post history is very disappointing.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:44 PM
1

No problem.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:58 PM
1

Our sidebar happens to contain quite a bit about the movement and also some suggested reading material. It's usually best to read through it first and our FAQs so we can better help answer questions you may have. Sometimes people with even the best of intentions may have a shaky introduction into the group without priorly reading the material. Please don't take it personally.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:38 PM
1

Currently these are the only groups I have listed as dealing with false accusations. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/support#wiki_links_for_the_falsely_accused. There are no doubt more groups out there that help with false accusations that are not listed yet.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 05:58 PM
3

I wish more of our community was getting involved like this, there are so many groups out there helping men yet it takes so much time and effort to find them, their goals and definitions, and determine if they truly help victims. I've spent an unholy amount of time on the wiki for a guy with ADHD lol.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 12:59 PM
4

Nice, adding this to the wiki. Edit: Wiki updated.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 12:45 PM
2

After some discussion with the mods about this situation, they feel it would be in the best interest if you had a Skype account or e-mail dedicated to business purposes (Paraphrasing here) so that we can protect your personal contact information to the best of our ability. The only information I would need after that would be the name of your group. Once I have that info I would enter it in as: (Location) (Group Name) (Representative) (Contact Information)
/r/MensRights24/06/14 03:22 AM
1

The sub founder and myself are both MRAs, not sure about the other mods.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 12:23 AM
2

Instead of bashing a sub barely two weeks old, could you discuss what issues you have with it?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 11:50 PM
3

Must be a regional thing, my state has them.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:04 PM
1

Alright, so I'm going to save your post and contact you once I have the page set up if that's alright with you. That way we can take care of it through pm's if you're uncomfortable posting it atm.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 02:14 PM
2

Given how large many countries are, I have had thoughts about creating more wiki's that cover local groups. So countries like the US and Canada would be broken down into individual states and provinces and locations like the UK would be broken down into separate countries. It would look something like: Country: US National Organizations: Local State/Province Organizations: Link to separate page So I would be more than happy to give your group a shout out even if all you have is a phone number fo…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:41 PM
1

Adding links for New Zealand, if anyone is interested in the source for the links here you go. http://canmen.org.nz/support-for-men/mensgroup/ Edit: New Zealand is quite the challenge, if anyone has experience with any of the NZ groups please share your insight.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:06 AM
2

What issues of gay men would you like to see more often? Rape? Domestic violence? Discrimination? Child custody? Marriage? Just because we do not discuss these issues does not mean that we don't acknowledge their existence. Is the GLBTQ community not working on these issues for gay men? If they are not I wasn't aware, I was under the impression that gay men had a group working in their interest. If a gay man is falsely accused of rape, I can see that getting attention from our sub. If a gay man …
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:27 AM
2

Sought.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 11:44 PM
1

This action would only cause more people to view our movement in a negative light. Take the wiki article on misandry for example, there was a huge back and forth with edits on the entry that admins have the article on lockdown.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 05:24 PM
3

Were you aware the SPLC tried to correct the view they labelled MRAs a hate group? http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2012/05/15/intelligence-report-article-provokes-outrage-among-mens-rights-activists/
/r/MensRights22/06/14 05:36 AM
2

Thanks for clarifying.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 02:45 AM
2

I'm sorry, could you clarify something? Do you mean that in prison 100% of convicted rapists are male or that rape occurs only in male prisons? The reason I ask is a quick google search got me this and other hits as well. I just wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt in case you meant something else.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 02:27 AM
1

They're just getting kicks from posting this in multiple subs.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 01:57 AM
1

Anyone have a source?
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:49 PM
2

If you are looking for more information here's a good place to look: http://toysoldier.wordpress.com/stop-the-abuse/ As well as this work in progress: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/support
/r/MensRights21/06/14 08:50 PM
1

Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 08:20 PM
5

I would also have her look at their stop the abuse page. It was very helpful for refrences when I put together the new wiki support group page we have.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 08:08 PM
1

In all fairness one of the images I saw led me to find this article. I dont know know anything about the reputation of the source, just that i was able to find it after doing a quick google search. Was the point you were making that it was not getting much coverage from fem sources or something? http://o.canada.com/news/indian-police-use-water-cannons-against-rape-protesters
/r/MensRights21/06/14 07:02 PM
4

I agree that pranks that involve declaring a member of the family, human or animal, to be dead are reprehensible, I had said so earlier. However instead of potentially ruining their relationship it sounds like they are mending it. That is why I think the couple is awesome, not because they're being shit people to each other, but because they're willing to forgive their partner for making a really dumb decision.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 02:21 PM
5

Now that is an awesome couple in my opinion. Hopefully they have a bright future.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:05 AM
2

I agree, I would like to see WBB kept in mensrants in all honesty.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 04:39 AM
10

That's actually a really shitty prank to try and pull. You don't go joking about leaving children in a car.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 11:52 PM
1

Well there's also the fact I was in charge of hiring and firing in a previous line of work as well. What state or country was this in?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 06:10 AM
1

By mankind are you referring to the mankind initiative or mankind counseling organization?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 05:29 AM
2

I'm sorry, this story just seems off. If it's true I'm sorry but your username makes me uneasy.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:57 AM
1

Please follow submission guidelines using np. in place of www.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:26 AM
1

The reality is if a large uptick in vote brigading occurs, the admins will be able to see that data and where the point of origin comes from. Several weeks ago they scanned the IP traffic on our sub and found a large increase in individual new IP's. This was not the result of some conspiracy to ruin our sub but because the Elliot Rodger incident occurred and drew people here who saw that the media's portrayal of us was grossly exaggerated and undeserved.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 12:49 AM
1

At the time that* I had commented they did not make the comment on drunk driving yet. I have nothing to say in defense of that. Edit: Added that.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 09:15 PM
2

Thanks for the heads-up, I have it labelled as controversial until further consensus.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 08:00 PM
0

I think what it stems down to, regarding your edit, was that you denied Crackpot's personal experience. Yes her statement generalized other women but she may be talking from her own personal experience. I believe she could have expressed herself better but there are people that think in terms like hers. Are those terms healthy, no, but they do exist. And unfortunately you are just as guilty as Crackpot by denying them.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:50 PM
7

It's irrational because the fem groups are just as open to attacks as we are, the same with every other subreddit out there.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:27 PM
4

I've removed mankind counseling from the support page and inserted the initiative in its place. Can we keep this to the sticky post about the support page? It was created in an effort to replace the out-of-date and sometimes harmful links that we have. The better the list the sooner we can update the sidebar.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:24 PM
3

And it would be beneficial to keep this on the sticky page about the new support page.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:05 PM
5

I have this group on our group support page for the wiki. I'm looking for more suggestions on what should be added, there's a sticky post about it.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:30 PM
1

Yep, but as I said its just theory on my part, I haven't tested it.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:17 PM
1

The link is not showing. If you wish to share it, click edit on your post and try to put it in again please.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:53 PM
9

Because what you're doing is called speculation. There is no evidence to support such an agenda. This is just like when 2xc became a default and people started complaining about harassment going on the rise and blaming it on going default. The admins stepped in and found out that the same people claiming harassment were making alts to send harassing Pm's to themselves.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:50 PM
1

Our sub experiences frequent trolling, please ignore this commentator. If you experience any form of harassment that may break reddit's or our subs rules please contact the mods so that they may handle it.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:41 PM
1

Submit text post, in title place []around title followed by the link surrounded by (). Leave no gap between [](). At least that's how it should work in theory.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:20 PM
7

And the link's dead.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:07 PM
41

Nope, lets just keep it together and not succumb to an irrational fear.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:03 PM
2

Just to let you know, whenever I've seen your username pop up I wonder to myself if you've managed to escape your toxic relationship or not. Hang in there.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:47 AM
7

Beat me to it, I linked to this though. http://cola.unh.edu/prevention-innovations
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:53 AM
10

Many members of the MRM are former feminists, studied academic feminism and participated in feminist groups. They attempted to speak up for men's issues and were ridiculed for it. Many will say feminism has accomplished much in its time but the current movement has much to answer for.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:39 AM
1

I hope to make the list as comprehensive and simple as possible. It was an issue I noticed from the previous attempts at this. If you compare the current support page to its sources you'll notice I've reduced the amount of content.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:53 PM
1

How good is your relationship normally? Have you ever discussed having children before? If you haven't before that's fine, there's no need to bring it up to her now. But if you have talked about it before you could say something along the lines of not trying to make this a competition between men and women but if you were to have a boy or girl they would both have real issues to face.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:45 PM
1

Yep, I hope to make it even better with everyones help.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:32 PM
1

What types of discrimination did you have in mind? Job discrimination? Other?
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:25 PM
5

Are you referring to the OP of the post or the thread?
/r/MensRights18/06/14 06:26 PM
2

Everybody has their luggage, if you're interested in the girl just go with it. Otherwise just move on to another girl. Like fred said, we're missing context here.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 06:22 PM
2

Contact the mods at message the mods to see what actions you should take.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:23 PM
2

When you have found that information go ahead and send it to the mods in a mod mail, they will be able to confirm your story if there are certain aspects you want to protect.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 03:40 PM
1

Don't worry too much about the archiver, it's just a bot.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 03:38 PM
1

I was just about to comment on how the thread had been locked as well.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:43 AM
1

Seems because you cross posted judging by what they have on their sidebar. :/
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:32 AM
1

Nope, you've followed the rules just fine.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:28 AM
1

If you haven't read our FAQs or wiki yet I would suggest those would be the first place to start looking. I'm not trying to sound abrasive but it's a frequently asked question. ;)
/r/MensRights17/06/14 05:02 PM
3

This is a difficult position that you're putting yourself into. If your friend is open to new ideas I would suggest that first you, the OP, watch videos by GirlWritesWhat on YouTube and then decide if the information provided by GWW is presented in a way that would make your friend want to learn more. Many people are oftentimes resistant to having their views changed if they are directly challenged with actual stats and figures so taking an indirect approach and effectively gauging how open your…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 05:17 AM
3

Not a problem, from what I've seen you're usually a reasonable person, mistakes happen.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:46 AM
2

If they changed the flair it might promote an interesting discussion actually.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:37 AM
8

I thought they covered it pretty well in their second paragraph.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:33 AM
2

Please check this link. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq#wiki_6._i.27m_writing_a_paper_or_doing_a_presentation_on_mens_rights._where_can_i_find_references.3F
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:05 AM
13

Feel free to come back in the future, I can't make any promises that asses will be gone but you're always welcome to share your experiences and view.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:56 AM
1

I don't really have much to contribute towards your questions, however I just wish for you to find success as a medical student and if your field of interest lies in birth control I hope that you'll be able to contribute to further development of it in your future. Good luck.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:19 AM
1

If it gets our sub more attention its not a problem with me. If anyone says to ignore my comment because I post here I respond with here's our sub and I would like people to browse it and reach their own conclusions. We're a more reasonable crowd than some people realize.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 11:59 PM
1

I agree that she says the interest of the child is paramount, however it is implied in the Daily Mail article that she wants to deny divorced fathers the right to have their children spend any time overnight at their homes. She is cited with claims that children under the age of four who spend time away from their mothers develop mental impairments. It is not said if any issues develop due to the absence of the father or how much time away from the mother is required for these impairments to dev…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 11:37 PM
1

Could you explain how you agree with her? I read the article myself and did not think enough information was given to draw any conclusions from.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 07:57 PM
1

Why dig up something from a year ago from an anon on yahoo? It's plain as day that it was a person trolling.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 07:44 PM
2

Not a practical or well-thought out solution. Also not a big of the generalizing here.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 04:15 PM
1

And by wiki you are referring to this correct? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/index So if in the case that a page devoted to maintaining working links appeared on the wiki page, would a link to that page take the place of the pages I've currently linked to in my post? (I apologize if that seems wordy, recovering from a bit of a cold.)
/r/MensRights14/06/14 03:21 AM
1

I would suggest messaging the mods to determine why the post was removed. People have gone out of their way in the past to manipulate responses to posts of this type to paint the sub in a negative light.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 01:02 AM
3

I'm sorry, where in their statement did they use the term women?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:21 PM
7

We don't make a point of distinguishing color, we just look at the numbers and the gender. Hopefully we'll be able to do more with more membership and recognition.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:48 AM
2

It kind of feels like you're trying to stir up trouble to be honest.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:45 AM
2

I thought so as well.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:46 AM
2

Is this in the Domestic Violence Links page? I didn't see it but I may not have been looking hard enough. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/d8omt/list_of_resources_for_men_in_need_of_immediate/
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:43 AM
1

1) You guys do not like to be generalized as violent and hyper-sexualized and yet I see in many of these posts women are generalized as manipulative and emotionally unstable. I personally do not think either way is a healthy way of viewing another group of people and would not think a serious feminist would generalize a group of men like that. Are people on MRA who generalize women like this on the fringe or the majority? That depends on what the context of the generalizing is. If the context is…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:17 AM
1

Exactly, there are so many throwaway accounts not responding to their own posts, that's why I'm so concerned.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:50 PM
2

MRM and MRA are not associated with Red Pill doctrine.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:36 PM
5

I don't want to be that person, but doesn't this seem too good to be true? We've been getting a large influx of trolls lately, I just think maybe getting a confirmation on identity from a mod would go a long way in my opinion.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:18 PM
3

I think he should also be prepared for some backlash as well. The actions his ex performed make it seem like a possibility.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:12 PM
48

Don't judge this video by its title, sit through until the end to get the full message.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:21 AM
3

I'm sure a lot of the victims would be sick if they knew their experience would only be counted as a sexual assault statistic and not a rape statistic according to the FBI database and other agency's.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:50 PM
2

We might be critical of feminism but that doesn't mean we hate women, quite the opposite in fact. Sure you'll find the odd person or two but they tend to get down voted and called out on it.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:20 PM
8

I think the serial number bar scan is supposed to be an allusion to male disposability.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:29 AM
24

Hello Pilot, first let me thank you for expressing an interest in Men's Rights and I agree with a lot of your observations on low-effort posts. I have a feeling if we had more people like yourself we could get a lot more accomplished at furthering the rights of both men and women.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:08 AM
7

I'm not sure but it probably has something to do with Demmian.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:27 PM
3

This is not normal, have you explained to her the pain it causes you? If you have and she continues the behavior, you need to have a serious talk about if continuing the relationship is the right thing to do.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:23 PM
2

It seems it changes every week wouldn't you say? ;)
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:15 AM
5

Lets not start misusing terms please, he's just a high school kid who is a little over their head right now. Probably wasn't expecting this post to be as popular as it is. I know his comment was rude but we're better than that.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:11 AM
1

You're right, I didn't necessarily express the ideas on gender roles correctly, thanks for the input.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:54 AM
1

And you'll be hard-pressed to find someone in our group who doesn't want to end gender roles or let women have more choices. The thing is these gender roles are taught to children in our schools from a young age, even if they don't realize it. Boys and girls are taught that they are different from a young age wouldn't you agree? What do they call girls who act like boys? A tomboy. A boy acting like a girl? A tame name is a sissy. And until they reach puberty they're at this innocent stage where …
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:28 AM
3

I see, I see. Well, that's kind of what men's rights is about. The founder of the mens rights movement used to be a prominent member of feminism, in fact they used to be a high-ranking member of NoW. But one day he realised that whenever he brought up the topic of men's rights, he was told men have enough rights and that was the end of the conversation. So he left the feminist movement to raise awareness of men's issues, because they had decided that our gender had it pretty good already.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:05 AM
7

Could you give an example of what a typical debate of these videos would like?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:49 AM
4

Who leads these discussions? Do you have guest speakers brought in or do you watch videos and discuss the video afterwards.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:41 AM
7

But what are the activities that you do as a group?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:33 AM
9

I'm curious, genuinely, what are your responsibilities as the club leader? What is your background in feminism like? Literature, education, family? Just so we can kind of understand each other.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:28 AM
3

Wow, I can't believe they have those stats when this article has been on their site for two years. Don't get your hopes up when reading the comments. http://domesticviolencestatistics.org/men-the-overlooked-victims-of-domestic-violence/
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:17 AM
1

$1200 to go.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:04 AM
1

Yep, I've read the title multiple times, I ain't about to get upset over this. If it said #YesAllWomen then I would probably be upset.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 12:09 AM
1

...This isn't an attack on men. Everyone needs to respect a person when they say no regardless of gender. It's got nothing to do with feminism or men's rights either.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 12:05 AM
2

This post is radioactive.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 11:19 PM
31

The moderators of the fem subs censor us when we bring these issues up in their forums. Our comments get deleted and our accounts are banned from their forums at their discretion. Otherwise you would be hearing these issues brought up a lot.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 10:32 PM
4

I just think it's curious that they have a 1yo account and this is the only thing they've ever posted... We've been getting way too many trolls lately.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:55 AM
1

Yes, I read the comment at the time it was posted(about 2 weeks ago I think), that doesn't mean that there were no legitimate cases occurring. If the subscribers to that sub want to have a safe place that's fine with me. There are better places to pick battles.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:43 PM
6

It's a bot that makes a copy of the post in the attempt someone attempts to manipulate the original at a later time.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:29 PM
3

You do understand they want to be taken off because some of the subscribers were receiving threatening and creepy pm's right? I can understand why they wouldn't want to deal with that wouldn't you?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:25 PM
3

All of that information is provided for you in our sidebar under FAQs. ;)
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:23 PM
5

You may not get as much backlash on this sub as you think, I would say most agree with your sentiments. Edit: But the reality is the fem subs are heavily censored.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:48 PM
2

This was a kind post and it has given me some thoughts, however I don't believe the line of reasoning would carry much weight in some circles.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 01:09 PM
5

We'll never know until we are allowed to congregate out in public and be recognized as a legitimate organization.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 12:27 PM
3

http://reference.avoiceformen.com/wiki/International_Men%27s_Day http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq#wiki_35._does_.2Fr.2Fmensrights_act_in_any_way_that_has_an_impact_on_the_real_world.3F
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:54 AM
3

Nah, it's always refreshing to see someone get called out on their bs.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:47 AM
1

I think the music got canceled but the organizers are still planning on continuing with the event anyways. Edit: My grammar sucks sometimes.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:44 AM
3

Yeah he's been a pretty common sight, no one has taken him too seriously for a while now.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:41 AM
5

Not offended, I think it's actually sad how some feminists can't put themselves in the shoes of another person sometimes. It probably isn't true of all feminists, most are probably decent people, but the fact that they can't recognize they're being sheltered from critical thought is disturbing at times. Sexism is sexism, it's a two-way street and an offensive word to accuse someone of. So until they finally recognize that fact, someone has to speak up for the underdog at this point and that woul…
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:39 AM
1

I'm not sure if this was what you were looking for but here's this. I'll keep searching though. Edit: Bugger, when you get to the web page put a ) at the end of the URL.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:05 AM
1

Argh, and I was just in the middle of a very long and personal post about why they should stick around and give people here a chance. :(
/r/MensRights31/05/14 01:35 AM
1

We're having an interesting conversation in this thread if you just want to lurk there while waiting. It may answer some of your questions.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 12:08 AM
1

Rape is forcing an unwilling, or incapable person to participate in non consensual sexual activities regardless of relationship or gender. (I'm wondering if that's too broad...)
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:29 PM
1

Well what points have you hit on so far?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:03 PM
1

Hey, glad to have you here.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 08:05 PM
3

Actually this is pretty normal for him.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:46 PM
1

You're always welcome to come back. The majority here don't hate individual feminists, we just recognize that modern feminism is not living up to its ideals. If you haven't read our sidebar, feel free to check it out sometime.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:39 PM
2

"Hey mom, did you hear about the men's DV shelter in Canada? I was checking out their site and they had this on it and it really got me thinking maybe those guys aren't as bad as they're made out to be." http://equalitycanada.com/debunking-debunking-mras/
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:02 PM
2

Take a look through our sidebar, it has a lot of useful information. I'm sure after you've done that and if you are still having issues, you will have received other useful replies. Edit: grammar
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:52 PM
8

What country, state or province are you from?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:13 PM
14

They're against shelters for men suffering from DV?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:57 PM
1

Ah, gotcha.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:01 PM
16

Hey! Thanks for the support, spread the word if you could. Be careful about who you approach with it though, you might get alienated from your friends. Feel free to contribute when you like.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:00 PM
1

Nope, I think you're doing just fine. How did you come by these anyways?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:54 PM
2

I think this was targeted at both genders, criticizing both. I thought the message at the end tied it together nicely. Overall not offensive. Edit: Read it again, what was I thinking the first time. I was enjoying the art more than the words.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:38 PM
1

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:25 PM
2

AVFM is a journal and opinion piece that covers the MRM. They provide funding and coverage for men's rights groups internationally. The journal is a controversial issue for some due to its harsh language and direct opposition to feminism. I would say CAFE is the most widely accepted. http://equalitycanada.com/
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:21 PM
23

Hey, thanks for the support it's appreciated.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:50 PM
3

It's actually pretty neat I think, they have a link on their page to a list of users who were banned and the comments they made that banned them.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:45 PM
2

Honestly, as long as the experience is the same from when it originally aired, I don't mind whatever proportion of genders they have staffed. It will be good to have it back on the air.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:13 PM
12

This has been appearing quite frequently lately.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:40 PM
6

Please read this portion of our FAQs for a better understanding of censorship the MRM movement faces. As for who taught us we were beasts, experience did. We don't fear being questioned, we love answering people that come here without bias on what the movement is about but there has been blame laid. I will gladly address you as you wish to be addressed, I have no issues with individuals who just want to learn more. I apologize for any rude behavior some of our members may have shown you, it's no…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:08 PM
4

This was a well thought out post, I enjoyed reading what you wrote.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:53 PM
29

We would like nothing more than to be able to have a proper discussion with feminists. But we can't. Why? Because we are censored. We are belittled and dismissed in feminist circles when we bring up that we face some of the same problems they do and we want to work together fix them. When we try to assemble at colleges to talk about male issues, they disrupt them by jeering the speakers and pulling fire alarms. When we post to feminist forums we are run out and banned. They had the SPLC label us…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:12 PM
1

Hey I just want to point out that we know nothing of their personal life. For all we know they could have been planning on raising a kid together and she just wanted a connection to remain between her and the deceased.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:36 PM
1

It would be wise.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:17 PM
1

Your post is breaking some rules here, 1. When linking to another sub you need to use np in place of www 2. I believe linking to 2xc is not allowed, same for other feminist subs.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:11 PM
7

You're not alone with these feelings you're having. Many members of this group are former feminists themselves that were shocked when confronted with the reality of their movement. Edit: I goofed a sentence.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:59 AM
3

Leave feminism is what I think Number357 is trying to say, hopefully...
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:33 AM
1

If it eases your concerns at all, I would like to make clear that this is a non-violent group, we welcome discussion and those who approach the movement with an open mind. Our moderators enforce reddit and sub policy quite fairly as well.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:22 PM
1

I wouldn't say that it is actively encouraged, it just happens to appear more often because of how frequently men's issues are dismissed or belittled. At present very few mainstream organizations are willing to take the MRM seriously as it is considered a movement born of hate thanks to the SPLC's involvement.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:37 PM
1

You might want to consider changing the www in your post to np so that it complies with post policy.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:28 PM
3

You know, what you've said is nothing new nor does it address any key issues. This reads like self-help material.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:16 AM
1

The President would be only able to offer a generic response to the petition seeing as it is a knee jerk reaction to what happened in California. Overall membership has actually risen because of these events.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:01 AM
2

Sign it, the guys at A Voice for Men have already. I don't have the link on me atm.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:50 AM
3

I don't know, our subscriber memberships going up. Being civil doesn't seem unreasonable.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:25 AM
1

The smaller subs don't see frequent use, all are welcomed in the main. Just as in the feminist organization, the MRM have a small vocal membership that feel they have been wronged by certain actions taken by another party. Also if you haven't visited the Voice for Men organization yet, here is a link to the YouTube videos of some female supporters. I'm afraid I can't answer the last one. http://www.avoiceformen.com/womens-voice/
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:08 AM
7

You're welcome to stay as long as you want. We have a fairly comprehensive sidebar with information pertaining to the MRM. I would suggest taking a look at the FAQs and the Voice for Men organization as well.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:00 AM
9

Well it's just about the Southern Poverty Law Center labeling a dozen groups that disagreed with feminism as hate groups (including this sub).
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:33 AM
21

Thanks for visiting, stay as long as you like and look through the material on our sidebar. If you decide to continue to visit, that's welcomed too. I sincerely hope for a happy marriage for you.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:25 AM
6

Are you familiar with the history of the SPLC and the MRM? http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/misogyny-the-sites
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:06 AM
2

Shouldn't the name be blanked out?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:49 AM
1

I'm afraid you may be mistaken there, the SPLC is not above declaring groups to be misogynistic. http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/misogyny-the-sites This is in part why it is so hard to assemble when such a stigma exists.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:45 AM
1

A sub similar to what you suggest does exist. http://np.reddit.com/r/FeMRADebates/ Unfortunately it has very low membership.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:28 AM
1

I'm unable to answer that sadly enough. It would be a difficult concept to accept for some.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:10 AM
2

In my opinion I think it's in feminisms best interest that an organization like the MRM continues to exist. I'd like to see the two be able to come together and accomplish real progress however the idea is not a popular one.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:58 AM
2

It's for people who feel they have been alienated or hurt by feminism regardless of gender or orientation. Of course with any organization not everyone will see eye to eye on it. If feminism did include male issues then we probably wouldn't be having this conversation.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:40 AM
3

There are many issues here that members of this sub feel feminism does not address. Female-on-male violence, lack of support services for men suffering from domestic violence, mental illness, rape, discrimination in child custody cases. These are only a few examples and our sidebar contains a comprehensive list of reading material for more detailed information.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:09 AM
2

Goldandigger is not outraged, but an amr troll. Look at comment history.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:41 PM
1

I'm not worried by it. The animosity is nothing new, just more visible than usual. FYI, the majority here don't hate women.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:39 PM
8

We have a very comprehensive sidebar containing men's rights information, supporters and sources that I'm sure will provide you with hours of reading material. Feel free to browse it at your leisure while waiting for other replies.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:23 PM
1

Seems to be referring to an twox post made today, not sure what it has to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:54 PM
9

With all due respect, I'm afraid you may be mistaken about what the Men's Rights Movement represents. We do not advocate violence, entitlement or any actions that promote discrimination. I would ask that you please have an open mind in regards to this sub as rumors circulate about the connection between Elliot Rodger and Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:28 AM
1

Thank you for that disclaimer, I was momentarily confused when it looked like you had made a sudden reversal of your message and began to argue with yourself.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:23 AM
46

If you haven't done so already, you may want to share this on /r/legaladvice as well.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 09:12 PM
2

CrossHook, you have a nasty trend of taking comments out of context. /u/rebuildingMyself seemed to understand the point I was making perfectly well, but you seemed to think I was on the woman's side on this issue when I was not. Grow up, it's embarrassing when new subscribers are scared of posting their own opinion, or sharing links, for fear of being labeled as a feminist, an apologist, or a white knight by radicals like yourself. It does not reflect well when these new subscribers think we are…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:15 PM
2

According to UK law, the employees company is the primary investigator into complaints of sexual harassment/assault. If the employee is not comfortable with their company performing an investigation, they may go to the police. This is the advice given for all UK workers, regardless of sex, age, or position level. http://www.safeworkers.co.uk/sexualharassmentwork.html http://www.staffs.ac.uk/assets/EOC%20checklist%20-%20sexual%20harassment%20gudiance%20for%20managers%20and%20supervisors_tcm44-215…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 02:40 PM
1

From the grand-daughters blog on their fundraising site, it seems to have been alluded to but no specific details were given. The grand-daughter may have just been venting at people that were attacking her grandfather.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 12:02 AM
1

It's mind-boggling, right?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 09:39 PM
1

Here's a somewhat entertaining YouTube video of a Q&A session with the man posted several days ago. There's not much talk about the eviction they're facing, but that may change due to the explosion in attention they are receiving. Youtube
/r/MensRights15/05/13 07:09 PM
1

That sub could use some more readers/content.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:14 PM
1

If you read what I said, I said let's wait for the company to complete their investigation. What if this isn't the first time that she has displayed this kind of behavior and the company is preparing a case against the woman to prevent future lawsuits from her? That's why I would rather sit on my hands for now and be up in arms about it later if the man comes up on the short side of the stick. There is no reason to throw patience under the bus.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 04:05 PM
3

No, it is most definitely not the movement itself. We do not wish to take away rights that feminism has fought for, but neither do we wish to have our own rights taken away from us in the process. Neither do we wish to be mocked for wanting benefits that women have, but men do not. Also I should clarify my comment regarding asshats in our sub. Some of our contributing members have been banned from subs such as SrS and other feminist subs for trying to engage in often polite dialogue with those s…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 02:20 AM
3

Please do so, yes our sub has a lot of asshats, but we also do have many men that have experienced serious discrimination based upon their sex, whether it is being denied the custody of their children, turned away from domestic violence shelters, or being suspected by strangers of being pedophiles to name a few.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:48 AM
3

I was going to say lets give the OP the benefit of our doubt, that is until I saw the edit they made to their post to /u/oied. It's disappointing.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:40 AM
5

Have you read the faq's yet or were you seeking independent opinion on the matter?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:24 AM
7

The woman has already been suspended by the company they work for while they conduct their investigation. Why don't we save the outrage for if they decide the man was at fault or if the woman keeps their position and pay for the company. I'm all for a lawsuit if the man ends up on the losing side of the company's investigation.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 11:37 PM
2

And about the first question I asked? Was there any paperwork done or was this basically a verbal agreement? Even with witnesses present, a paper trail holds up better as evidence.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 08:09 PM
1

Was there any paperwork conducted at the intervention, as in did either you or your ex sign anything? Perhaps it is a matter to discuss with your parents, you don't even need to bring up your orientation, just say my ex spread rumors about me raping her, we had an intervention at school with police present and that if your ex doesn't follow through on the requirements, you would like their help to obtain a lawyer. Edit: Spelling.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 07:28 PM
2

The most recent thing I've heard from Utah was this. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/s-military-dad-reunited-baby-article-1.1249061
/r/MensRights03/05/13 04:25 AM
6

Because condoms have an absolute 0% chance of causing pregnancy. In reality even when used correctly, there is still a 2-3% chance of breaking. If you don't want kids, get a vasectomy, use a condom to prevent transmission of disease folks.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 01:41 PM
10

And under VAWA 2005 it requires that women be reimbursed in full by law enforcement regardless of whether or not they choose to cooperate with the police. Under the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005 (“VAWA 2005”), starting in 2009, states must certify that they do not “require a victim of sexual assault to participate in the criminal justice system or cooperate with law enforcement in order to be provided with a forensic medical exam, reimbursement for …
/r/MensRights30/04/13 01:45 AM
1

Yeah, something's definitely not right here, OP made the post 9 hours ago but only responded to the rightsbot. Very suspicious.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:10 AM
55

Hey when you're feeling up to it, we would like to hear more about the aftermath of all of this, are you still dealing with this issue, looking to further pursue the issue, or has it been resolved to your satisfaction.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 06:51 PM
3

If convicted she would only face up to six months in prison and have to pay restitution to the police for the hours spent on her investigation, according to most news articles. HuffPost
/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:00 PM
5

Pretty sure CrossHook is a troll themselves. Here's a rant they made on a thread the other day where the OP was a feminist wanting to know more about MR. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ba20u/i_am_part_of_a_feminist_organization_and_our_next/c951j09 Almost all of his replies to the other commenters were angry in nature or labeling as white knights.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 02:04 PM
18

From the sub guidelines: /r/MensRights strongly supports principles of free speech. People posting here are sharing their opinions. Opinions will not be removed, but actions may (see above rules). Investigative journalism is fine. OP has as much right to be in this sub as you or myself, denying her a right to discuss the topics of Men's Rights is counter to our principle that encourages discussion. While it is encouraged to read the material provided in the sidebar, some people benefit more from…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 06:42 AM
2

You might want to check-up on what you're saying before you say it next time, community property is not a common law, as OP's case is in Colorado. http://www.fairmark.com/spousal/comprop.htm
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:13 AM
3

In your original comment you said: I had the reflection that the reason that the female gang-rape in India was so globally publicized was because it was such a common occurrence due to the genderalized laws in that country. My reply to this was to point out how uncommon the event was, by any national standard in the same class category as India. Now what separates this case from the S. African case is that this white male is not in a critical condition after the attack, hospitalized yes, but not…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:14 PM
6

The reason that case received so much attention was due to how traumatic the injuries to the woman were, to the point where she later died. And by traumatic I mean her abdomen had been torn open with a metal rod and her guts spilling out.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 05:43 PM
19

Well apart from breaking the rules at the convention she was at and getting offended by technical terms in the industry she worked in. Here's a list that another redditor put together. http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1ap4bc/the_pycon_incident/c8ziu02
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter