TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lupinfujiko Archive

View 63 posts and 1,398 comments by Lupinfujiko on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1423

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights26/07/18 05:28 PM
974

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:02 PM
389

FeminismLupinfujiko/r/MensRights01/05/18 01:33 PM
338

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights07/08/19 04:24 AM
113

FeminismLupinfujiko/r/MensRights04/10/19 09:20 PM
92

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:12 PM
81

FeminismLupinfujiko/r/MensRights17/05/18 12:39 PM
71

Edu./Occu.Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights29/01/19 05:19 PM
59

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:06 PM
51

Anti-MRMLupinfujiko/r/MensRights23/07/18 08:13 PM
48

Edu./Occu.Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights26/07/18 12:02 PM
47

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights30/09/16 10:08 PM
44

Anti-MRMLupinfujiko/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:36 PM
41

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights19/03/18 12:39 PM
40

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights20/11/17 05:54 PM
40

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:58 PM
39

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights02/03/17 07:00 PM
36

FeminismLupinfujiko/r/MensRights27/05/19 02:37 PM
32

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights29/01/17 11:11 PM
31

Edu./Occu.Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights10/10/17 04:15 PM
30

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights09/07/18 03:58 AM
28

Edu./Occu.Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:08 AM
25

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:55 PM
23

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights05/06/19 02:58 PM
22

Edu./Occu.Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:14 AM
21

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights12/12/18 12:54 AM
19

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights26/03/19 02:28 PM
19

GeneralLupinfujiko/r/MensRights11/10/18 05:18 PM
19

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights23/04/20 02:57 PM
17

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights11/02/20 03:13 AM
17

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights26/01/20 09:13 PM
17

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights02/11/16 01:36 PM
17

GeneralLupinfujiko/r/MensRights29/01/19 05:12 PM
16

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights12/11/18 05:48 AM
15

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights09/09/18 03:09 AM
13

GeneralLupinfujiko/r/MensRights02/07/18 05:07 PM
13

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights14/02/17 12:49 AM
13

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights27/02/17 03:54 PM
12

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights14/02/17 05:37 AM
12

False AccusationLupinfujiko/r/MensRights13/07/18 11:40 PM
11

Activism/SupportLupinfujiko/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:26 PM
11

QuestionsLupinfujiko/r/MensRights18/06/17 12:50 AM
11

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:10 AM
10

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights13/12/18 08:32 PM
9

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights02/11/16 08:50 PM
9

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights13/06/19 04:21 AM
7

Edu./Occu.Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights12/07/18 07:28 PM
7

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights11/02/17 06:53 PM
7

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights29/07/18 01:27 AM
7

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights14/02/17 03:03 AM
6

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:16 PM
5

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights06/08/18 08:16 PM
4

Activism/SupportLupinfujiko/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:30 PM
4

FeminismLupinfujiko/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:28 AM
4

Activism/SupportLupinfujiko/r/MensRights16/11/18 12:13 AM
3

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights15/09/18 04:02 PM
2

Anti-MRMLupinfujiko/r/MensRights29/11/18 09:55 PM
2

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights14/02/17 04:21 PM
2

Social IssuesLupinfujiko/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:19 PM
1

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights30/09/16 09:58 PM
1

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights01/04/19 05:01 PM
0

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights09/12/16 02:27 PM
0

Lupinfujiko/r/MensRights06/07/17 02:29 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,398 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

They should read books about war. I'm pretty sure fighting in war was not fun.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:09 PM
9

I think it is a question of "oppressed or favoured?" On one hand I do understand feminist complaints about not having as many CEOs, or female sports not being as popular. On the other hand, most women don't seem to realize how many advantages they have for being a woman. "Women and children first". Women are a protected class, we always go out of our way to excuse toxic feminine behaviour. We always give small advantages to women, whether it's better service at a coffee shop, or whether it's get…
/r/MensRights12/03/22 03:24 PM
2

It's raising awareness for how we as women feel a lot. It would be interesting to see a world without men for a day. Everything would completely fall apart in a matter of minutes. It would be interesting to see how she feels about it then.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 01:03 AM
1

There's a shortage on decent males once women get past 35. Right. Thank you for proving my point.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 11:36 PM
1

You guys on this sub need to get in line with each other. Why? People are allowed to have different opinions. I don't speak for everyone. I mean, you can't both be right. Why not? Both could be true. Some women might like "muscles" as you say, some women might like "status". I found as soon as I turned 40 I had a "renaissance" in my dating life. Women who are divorced, or single mothers are suddenly a lot more approachable.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 04:25 PM
0

How old are you? I'm early 40s, and that has been my experience.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 01:17 PM
0

First of all, women aren't primarily attracted to men's sexuality. They are attracted to his wealth and status. As a man gets older, he accumulates this more, making him more attractive. Why do you think there are so many younger, attractive women with older men?
/r/MensRights10/06/20 12:45 PM
0

For sure. Once again shattering the myth of "male privilege". The only thing I can offer is it changes over time. Once you hit 35+ approximately, the whole thing switches.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 10:31 AM
1

Lol. Crushed.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 10:27 AM
2

Good heavens. Sometimes I no longer want to live in this world.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 02:00 AM
6

"I'm sick of talking about men." "Now I'm going to talk about men for the next hour."
/r/MensRights26/05/20 05:30 PM
0

"Your Troll votes do not count". Lol.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 09:25 PM
2

Is she drunk?
/r/MensRights25/05/20 09:22 PM
2

"Yes, sounds about right. Let's give her government funding." The Australian Government
/r/MensRights24/05/20 04:58 PM
2

Government funding for a feminist claiming "coronavirus isn't killing men fast enough." Saying that, gets you government funding in Australia. But apparently men are the privileged ones.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 04:56 PM
28

This is a subject we can't win. Either we're right, and we're cheap. Or we're wrong, pay for everything, and told we're privileged.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 05:06 AM
1

"Women are biggest victims of war."
/r/MensRights15/05/20 08:46 PM
1

When will we stop accepting these false realities? It is destroying society. We have lost the ability to speak plainly about truth. I don't mean a question of values. Well said. I don't know. I've done my best. I'm not getting through to people anymore. Everyone has shut down.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 02:11 AM
4

Well, I for one do not share this opinion. Christina Hoff Sommers is an ally, is she not? Why is AVFM taking a shot at an ally?
/r/MensRights12/05/20 09:57 AM
1

It must be really difficult when people assume to know things about you just because of your physical characteristics.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 09:53 AM
23

United Nations Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, who, in his appeal in early April for a global ceasefire, emphasized that women and children are among the most vulnerable in times of war Yes, that's right folks. Women and children are the most vulnerable. The hundreds of thousands of men who died face down in the muck after enduring hours of hellish warfare were actually not vulnerable. Just the women and children. The UN has spoken. Something something "equality".
/r/MensRights12/05/20 09:49 AM
3

Removing it really drives the point home.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 02:49 AM
1

That was one of the dumbest articles I've ever read. The better leadership opportunities, meanwhile, are reserved for men — something researchers refer to as the "glass cushion." Nobody wants to sit on a glass cushion, you moron. I seriously can't take it anymore. It hurts my brain. When did everyone become completely mental? Why are these imbeciles given a platform to spew literally the dumbest premise you could have ever imagined, backed up by absolutely nothing? It hurts my brain. I actually …
/r/MensRights08/05/20 05:32 AM
1

Ha. Yes, it was sarcastic. Sorry bud! :)
/r/MensRights06/05/20 10:29 PM
2

Found the bot. Lol
/r/MensRights06/05/20 09:07 PM
0

You have exactly proven my point. Liberals apparently aren't interested in hearing what men have to say. Thank you for proving my point.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 04:22 PM
-1

Talking about the conservation of traditional roles and ideals. Firstly, I don't see anything wrong with that. Secondly, it's not like liberalism does this fairly in any sense. You never hear liberalism complaining there aren't enough garbagewomen or boiler makers. You never hear liberalism complaining there aren't enough male teachers or nurses. If Feminism were about "equality", they would argue in favour of these imbalances. If liberalism were about changing gender roles in society, they woul…
/r/MensRights06/05/20 03:49 PM
-1

Conservative ideals want to keep you in chains, and treat you as dangerous and disposable. No they don't. What are you talking about. Modern Conservative values want you to be free. You can be liberal without being feminist No you can't. Not anymore. Our governments have made sure of that.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 02:44 PM
-1

Who here is a liberal yet stands up for men's rights, or am I in the minority? How can you be? The Liberal establishment is clearly anti men. Misandric talking points like "toxic masculinity" and "the patriarchy" are two prominent examples. How can you possibly support a Liberal cause whose entire existence wants to see you removed, humiliated and censored from society?
/r/MensRights06/05/20 02:01 PM
5

It isn't about Joe. I don't see anyone here "throwing Joe under the bus". Of course he's allowed due process. It's about the hypocrisy of the left and #MeToo.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 01:56 PM
2

At least the Democrats are less likely to kill you. I highly doubt that's true.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 01:54 PM
5

Yes. People who disagree with you must be "a bot".
/r/MensRights06/05/20 01:52 PM
2

But we don't. Because there are rules for Progressives, and rules for everyone else.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 01:51 PM
61

I've often heard feminists scream, "just listen!" But I've never been listened to by a feminist. They'll even have the gall to suggest "why don't you start up your own movement." And then they'll attack that movement as being "misogynist" (it's not). I think you could basically summative it as narrative control.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 05:21 PM
1

Man, I would hate to be her husband. Just kidding. I'm sure she doesn't have a husband.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 03:39 AM
5

O Canada. /s
/r/MensRights04/05/20 11:15 PM
24

I feel like if it hasn't happened yet, it isn't going to happen.
/r/MensRights04/05/20 11:14 PM
8

Well, sure! Male privilege, and female privilege exist. It's the lack of acknowledgement of female privilege which makes the accusation of male privilege seem sinister. The Big Feminism definition of male privilege seems to hinge on the Apex Fallacy. That is, because most CEOs are men, therefore most men have privilege. This is incorrect reasoning. For one thing, if a male CEO demonstrates "male privilege", then what does the wife and daughters of CEOs demonstrate? For another, the vast majority…
/r/MensRights01/05/20 05:54 PM
3

Sorry my bad. I didn't mean to jump on you. Not your fault. :)
/r/MensRights01/05/20 05:29 PM
7

I outright reject the concept of: "The patriarchy" "Male privilege" "Toxic Masculinity" Anyone or any group who discusses these misandric concepts in any meaningful manner have completely missed the boat, and will not be taken seriously. That is not up for negotiation.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 05:02 PM
7

They've really gotten a lot of mileage out of the Polytechnic Massacre. Over 30 years ago and still beating that dead horse as if it's still somehow culturally relevant. The tone of the article makes it sound as though they want white men to remain "angry".
/r/MensRights27/04/20 10:17 PM
3

#BelieveAllWomen Edit: I meant that ironically. In case that wasn't obvious. Lol.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 09:25 PM
2

But I was told women can't rape men.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 09:25 PM
3

Isn't Senator Hirono the one who said men should "just shut up"?
/r/MensRights24/04/20 09:22 PM
8

Feminism is built on a series of lies.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 05:53 PM
2

Vice Media is a fake news hate group.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 03:35 AM
11

That was amazing man! Really well done!
/r/MensRights24/04/20 03:33 AM
2

'This is not about stopping people from speaking,' she said. Just white men. 'We're a university that encourages free speech. Except against white men.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 04:16 PM
2

Definitely not stupid. If it were about "equality", it would be called "egalitarianism" or "humanism". What part of that do you disagree with?
/r/MensRights22/04/20 02:25 PM
5

Like I said in my other post, I will not negotiate with feminism. That door was open. Now it is closed. whilst feminists don’t blame everything on men I couldn't disagree more with that sentence. You could say not all women blame everything on men. And that's totally true. But Feminism does, in fact, blame everything on men. That's by definition. That's why it's called "Feminism" and not "egalitarianism". It is a morally bankrupt political activist movement no longer interested in the truth, but…
/r/MensRights22/04/20 05:31 AM
3

I just think when the first thing on the table is "toxic masculinity", I'm going to go ahead and say "no go". It's an absolute non starter. It would be like walking up to a Feminist negotiating table with the agenda of "a woman's role in the kitchen". Non-starter. The fact of the matter is, Feminism has stopped us, interfered with us, and vilified us to a point where it is clear they are not negotiating in good faith, nor are they interested in doing so. Feminism is no longer about equality. If …
/r/MensRights22/04/20 05:28 AM
5

Trust me, I've tried talking to Feminists. You sound like you're new at this, and optimistic. And that's great, I applaud you. But trust me, once you start pointing out the holes in their theory, or making counter points, things go off the rails pretty quickly. Feminists are some of the most unreasonable people on the planet.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 09:38 PM
9

Toxic Masculinity is a sexist and misandric concept. In addition, it is completely false. Men do show emotion. All the time. To other men. I have heart to heart comments with my boys almost daily. It's only women who chide men for not showing emotions. Women, who want their men to be "stoic, strong" or "tall, dark, handsome". Good-looking, doesn't say a lot. You can see examples of this all over the Internet, and in your personal life. Has a man ever told you to "man up"? I've never heard that o…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 09:00 PM
8

I was banned after my first comment, and it was simply because I post here. They are not interested in having a debate with us.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 08:44 PM
1

The Marxist underpinnings of the establishment grow more ferocious everyday.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 08:26 PM
1

iTs AbOuT eQuAlItY.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 08:24 PM
6

I outright reject the concept of toxic masculinity. I disagree with pretty much everything you just said here.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 08:22 PM
9

Watch the movie. I think there needs to be more debate between MRA’s and feminists (not pointing out either party, both can be a bit intense) Tell that to Feminists. We're all banned from there. We're not allowed to talk to them.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 08:21 PM
1

Her response is sexist. Not to mention recklessly inaccurate. I suspect the majority of teachers today exhibit this same type of bias. It is completely reprehensible.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 11:16 AM
1

Guys, women are "rockstars" I don't know what we'd do without these women! And don't forget guys, a significant number of these evidence-loving rock stars are women. Lol. What a joke.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 11:12 AM
1

Yeah, you're probably right about a lot of things. We're probably both right if that makes any sense. I just don't trust the current Democrat establishment. If it were Sanders, maybe. But Biden? No way.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 12:19 AM
2

Yeah, it's kind of sad really. Knowing Bernie's nomination has been stolen away from him twice now is rather detestable. if social issues are improved (decriminalization of drugs, I like. decriminalization of prostitution, I like. universal healthcare, This one is complicated. I'm actually Canadian. I think there are good sides and bad sides to both. For example, the United States is already over-diagnosed/over-prescribed. How much more serious will this situation become of it's universal health…
/r/MensRights20/04/20 10:10 PM
8

I think at this point the Democrats have demonstrated themselves to be intellectually dishonest ideologues more interested in pushing an agenda than fair government for all. They've lost their way. Pelosi, Schumer, Booker, AOC, they've become a pathetic farce. I will not support them in such a sad state of affairs.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 06:02 PM
10

I was a lifelong Democrat. All changed at exactly Brett Kavanaugh. The Democrats thoroughly embarrassed themselves during that whole episode. Now they're going to nominate Biden, a man who has multiple allegations against him. And they don't find that completely outrageous? I honestly don't even understand how they can sleep at night being that brazenly hypocritical.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 05:53 PM
2

It's okay guys. We're just going to chop off your penis. You'll be fine. You don't need it anyway. See how well girls do without a penis?
/r/MensRights20/04/20 05:50 PM
1

I honestly feel bad for how much they are STILL suffering when I got over it a LOT faster. You don't need to feel guilt here. Just boggles my mind why they could do it if they were so in love Well... That's a long and complicated question, and I'm sure they don't understand it either. Which is probably why they are feeling so guilty, and keep contacting you. It's an existential doubt. If they cheated on someone they loved so much, then there must be something wrong with them, right? But there is…
/r/MensRights18/04/20 02:48 AM
2

He's feeling guilty and trying to alleviate his guilt. It sounds like you want them both to just leave you alone now. Is that the case?
/r/MensRights18/04/20 02:26 AM
9

That was one of the best, most helpful books I've ever read. He's absolutely right in his assessment here. When you consider most of the authority figures we meet early in our lifetime are women, it makes perfect sense we've developed a "nice guy" mentality. We want to "please" our mothers, teachers, friends, and improve our social standing. This carries with us into later life. We put these feelings of failure and disappointment into a bag and carry it along behind us, dragging us down. It turn…
/r/MensRights13/04/20 04:25 AM
7

But but... I thought it was all about EqUaLiTy.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 04:07 AM
2

But but... I thought we should always "believe women".
/r/MensRights04/04/20 04:14 PM
3

When in doubt, claim racism and sexism.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 04:12 PM
6

Jessica Yaniv comes to mind...
/r/MensRights30/03/20 09:23 PM
1

Oh, but don't worry. They'll get their funding. Our "feminist" Prime Minister Blackface has announced $50 million to women's shelters for DV already. There is millions more on the table for charities and support groups. And 100% for sure, women's groups will receive the lion's share of that money.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 04:36 PM
34

We're not allowed to talk about drag queens. Because it's "hate" or "bigotry" or something like that.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 04:33 PM
3

Yeah, right. Women bump into each other, say they're sorry, then turn around and plot a scheme to give their opponent a crippling eating disorder.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 04:32 PM
1

Hahahahahaha! That's fantastic. Thanks man! Yeah, I get the idea! I want to go to a death metal concert!
/r/MensRights28/03/20 11:04 PM
1

Ha. Sure. Why not? We've got time. Can you describe how a death metal concert goes?
/r/MensRights28/03/20 10:23 PM
2

That's called "stream of consciousness" writing, popularized by James Joyce. It's beautiful. I bet you write like a demon when you're high. That would be a pleasure to read.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 10:12 PM
3

I love the way you write. That entire rant was basically one long, uninterrupted sentence.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 10:00 PM
5

RUUUNNNNN!!
/r/MensRights28/03/20 09:02 PM
3

This is further evidenced by what happens to women when they disagree with the narrative. "BELIEVE WOMEN!" Here's a woman who disagrees. "SHE'S A TRAITOR!! GET HER!!" This happens all the time. Ask women who are pro-life for example.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 07:54 PM
3

eQuAlItY
/r/MensRights27/03/20 10:30 PM
9

Men and Republicans. Lol. I love it. It's almost as though "man" has become synonymous with "Republican". Never thought I'd see the day, and yet there it is.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 04:42 AM
65

She used the wrong "your".
/r/MensRights26/03/20 04:41 AM
9

Usually called that by women. And usually when they want you to do something which will boost them up while you suffer pain or humiliation.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 04:40 AM
2

Smoking, drinking, general poor health If this were women, the headline would be: "Women face more health problems than men because of societal pressure" In other words, men are always bad. Women are always good.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 06:17 PM
2

That is so stupid. Men show vulnerability, and women immediately chide them for being weak. And then they claim men not showing their emotions is "toxic masculinity". You just can never win.
/r/MensRights20/03/20 02:11 PM
2

Have you actually heard a woman say "man flu"? I've never actually heard anyone in real life say that. What a dumb thing to say.
/r/MensRights20/03/20 05:30 AM
19

One of my favourite lines from that misandric video: "When everyone believes you. Now that's that like?" Lady, everyone does believe you. There's a # for you. They believed Blasie Ford for an accusation which occurred 35 years earlier, in which she herself said she couldn't even remember properly. Meanwhile, they didn't believe Brett Kavanaugh. I'm so fucking sick of hearing "society doesn't believe women". Nonsense. In reality, it's the complete opposite. Society doesn't believe men.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 05:55 PM
7

Yes, she sucks. There is so much wrong with that video.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 05:52 PM
6

This is so stupid it hurts my brain. Fuck Feminism and their endless frivolous, baseless complaints. The whole world is ending, millions of men are losing their jobs, livelihood, everything. Yet the biggest complaint is who went to the store to purchase groceries (paid for by whom I wonder). What a sick, disgusting, arrogant pathetic joke.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 05:49 PM
9

#FreePizza Remember guys. Feminism is about equality. Right? Lol.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 05:14 PM
9

In Australia, 79.9 per cent of those working in the healthcare and social assistance sectors are women. If that had been men, then that would have been sexist. There would have been calls for "we need more women in healthcare!" In other words, everyone is sexist. Men are to blame. Even coronavirus is sexist.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 03:28 PM
1

Oh, I saw that coming.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 05:02 PM
22

I love how they say "SHOW ME PROOF!" as though that's some sort of a mic drop moment. Burden of proof falls on the positive claim. They have failed to prove their claim. They are the ones who need to "SHOW PROOF". I have yet to see a clear cut example of a man and a woman working the same job, same experience, and not getting paid the same. I have yet to see that, because it's illegal.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 05:00 PM
5

It used to be about getting the vote, illegalization of rape etc. It's exactly what you said. It's gone from "equality" to superiority. But is it considerably worse than every other problem a man would face No. Of course not. Men/boys are bigger and are required to eat more. Should they receive an extra credit to help pay for this "inequality"? It's just such a ridiculous complaint. It truly makes them look immature, and really undermines the underlying idea of equality.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 06:06 PM
28

Feminism has become about teenage girls complaining about having to pay for tampons. If you can show me a more ridiculous, more baseless, more frivolous argument about anything anywhere, I'm all ears.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 04:54 PM
1

"The negative comments will come from other women." Nails it. This is exactly what will happen. Women complain about "society" putting difficult pressures on them; but that pressure is mostly coming from other women.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 02:42 PM
7

That didn't age well. Lol.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 02:40 PM
7

That's beautiful. It ends in "needs to listen". Feminism won't listen.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 03:53 AM
8

That's the classic joke. "Why do men need rights? They already have all the rights!" Ha. Ha. Ha. I mean, so do all women of course. So does everyone. We have a Charter for that. But somehow it isn't as funny if you tell it that way. This joke was told by Joe Rogan himself. I was surprised. I thought Rogan was super-informed and knowledgeable about everything. But he seems woefully ignorant about Men's Rights. Very strange. It's like people have a massive blind spot.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 08:51 PM
3

'These ridiculous allegations have no basis in fact and no relevance to these proceedings.' It's incredible how quickly feminism doesn't "believe all women" as soon as it doesn't fit their narrative.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 08:47 PM
2

Jesus. I'm glad you backed out. You must have been terrified man.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 09:36 PM
8

So many or women's complaints about "society" come from other women. "Women are slut shamed". Yes, from other women. "Women have to look good and wear makeup at work.". Yes, because of other women. "Women have to breastfeed / not breastfeed.". Yes. Again because other women tell them. So often I hear women complaining about society. But really, they are complaining about other women.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 08:55 PM
13

The first sentence is hilariously ironic: This year’s International Women’s Day theme, ‘More powerful together’, is a call for men, women and gender diverse people to work together for equality. But, didn't she just tell men to "shut up"?
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:12 PM
5

But I thought feminism was all about equality.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 04:16 PM
11

Proving Big Feminism is a business. It no longer has anything to do with equality.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 03:58 AM
10

It's more effective than saying "... His father is dying." Because people are more moved when women die.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 03:56 AM
87

How much longer must we tolerate male brutality against women and children? What a despicable display of dishonest journalism. I'm so sick of this bullshit. Go fuck yourselves Guardian.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 01:19 PM
9

That's a good point. The_D definitely likes memes. They're good at them too. Pepe is hilarious.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 01:06 PM
8

Taylor has no idea what it's like to be a man, no idea what it's like to be a father, and no idea what it's like to not have privilege. Well said.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 08:35 PM
1

What happened? Can someone give me a summary?
/r/MensRights04/03/20 05:35 AM
5

Vice Media is a sick, pathetic joke.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 05:31 AM
7

Really? Interesting. I've never seen that movie. The comedy with Steve Martin and Rick Moranis, right? Should I watch it?
/r/MensRights03/03/20 10:07 PM
89

It's a quotation from Warren Farrell from the book "The Myth Of Male Power". It is a fantastic quotation.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 07:09 PM
99

I hate having this debate irl, because very seldom do you get an honest answer. The women I've spoken to about this always say they go half/half. Except, I know this to be false. So where do you go from here? Then, inevitably, you get like a group of girls, and some whiteknight noob guy who just wants to get laid tonight, and they all turn on you and say, "well you must not be dating the right girls!" Then you're just left feeling cheap and miserly. Then, in order to shake that feeling, you end …
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:24 PM
718

"Women have choices. Men have responsibilities."
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:21 PM
118

The "Empathy Gap" is another. How society cares about women more than men.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:14 PM
190

"The glass floor" is a good one, coined by Warren Farrell. While there may be societal factors preventing women from reaching the top; there are also societal factors allowing men to fall through the bottom. That's why we have so many homeless men, suicide, and workplace deaths. #MenToo is another one. But I think there are two reasons we don't fall back on memes: A. Men generally don't like the "cheapness" of a meme. B. The Media never repeats the man's point of view. That's why you've heard "t…
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:09 PM
1

"Why do men always try and take away things which are only for women?" Pot. Kettle. Black.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 12:34 AM
6

That's not a good world. When facts and truth are not a priority and people are only worried about what they want to believe, it makes me not want to be in a relationship, where I live in world where I can be alleged to doing something, and people will belive it because I'm a man. This is correct. And then they'll tell you you're privileged. Sit down and take it, privileged bigot asshole. It is beyond reprehensible. The damage they are doing to our youth and society is reaching to unrepairable l…
/r/MensRights29/02/20 01:22 PM
8

In this way, we realize modern-day feminism is complete and utter nonsense. Trump? He's a privileged WHITE MALE!! REEEEE!! Trudeau? Oh, he's so dreamy... And so handsome. Sigh... Trudeau came from a more privileged background than Trump. And he's a straight white male. And he has an accusation of sexual harrassment against him. And Blackface. These labels actually don't mean anything. Just your politics. In other words, they are being intellectually dishonest when they say straight white men hav…
/r/MensRights28/02/20 11:14 PM
18

There are women who seem to think if you're gay, you have the same politics/thoughts/opinions as they do. When they find out that's false, they have no idea what to do with you anymore. Douglas Murray and Milo Yiannopolis can testify to this. (Not saying those are your politics, but that women don't know how to classify those two).
/r/MensRights28/02/20 11:09 PM
8

My mind wasn't changed by what? By Taylor Swift's hypocritical misandry? I think plenty of men will see this video and realize how baseless feminist claims really are. And how brazenly they exploit this tired and false ideology. Big Feminism is a business, and Taylor Swift is cashing in. At the expense of young men and boys. You don't think this is something worthy of pointing out? Edit: But I’m not fighting will self-righteous trolls anymore. You mean, you're not fighting yourself? Have a good …
/r/MensRights28/02/20 05:57 PM
15

Do you think it's productive for change when millionaire misandrist hypocrites lecture the public about how greasy men are?
/r/MensRights28/02/20 05:17 PM
29

Okay, let's start by rejecting blatant misandry told by hypocritical millionaires in the mainstream.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 04:55 PM
12

I'm honestly insulted watching this video.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 04:52 PM
2

Those are all very good points. In all, men and women are different. I wish feminism would acknowledge that. Trade offs. Sure, I acknowledge in some way it's better to be a man. But certainly, in other ways it's better to be a woman. Why's that a problem? Why does it have to be one who is a victim, and one who is an oppressor? Men and women compliment each other very well. We work well together. Why can't we go back to working with each other instead of against each other.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 10:13 PM
3

"Men are bad." I hear it all the time. Usually between giggling women. If they see me looking at them, they say they're "just joking". And maybe they are. But imagine if I said "women are bad." I don't think anyone would like that.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 03:54 PM
3

I've had hundreds of conversations exactly like that. Often in public irl, or in public on Facebook. A man never comes off looking good if a female attacks him. Which is sexist, but whatever. I'm very happy to have discovered Reddit. I can have these arguments without sullying my reputation. PS - Feminists are bat shit crazy.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 03:52 PM
7

When they torture men, they generally keep quiet. When they threaten men with torturing a female colleague, the man usually breaks. When they threaten a woman with torturing a male colleague, the woman usually does not break. This demonstrates our society's natural tendency to protect women. This is where you get "women and children first" and White Knighting. It's our natural, human tendency to protect women.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 03:49 PM
5

This is so depressing. In no small way did she contribute to his suicide. That's terrible.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 03:44 PM
1

Because... muh... the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 03:39 PM
1

In a word: Feminism.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 09:59 PM
2

Imagine wanting to get laid this badly.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 12:50 AM
11

You don't. It always goes sideways. All too often they perceive it as an attack on them. They are high in the Care Moral Foundation. Most of the time, one should appeal to a woman's sense of care/pain/community. Show how men are being used and abused by the system. When she (inevitably) says, "but women have gone through this for centuries.", you can respond with, "that doesn't make it right." It doesn't challenge her worldview, and shouldn't put her back up, which is certainly something you wan…
/r/MensRights21/02/20 05:48 PM
7

Vice Media is such nonsensical garbage it boggles the mind. Why give a platform to this person?
/r/MensRights21/02/20 05:44 PM
2

There was a service like this is Toronto for a short time. It went bankrupt. Not enough demand.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 01:27 AM
0

I love the Japanese.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:08 PM
2

Do you see the face of that man who tweeted that out? That's the face of a man who wants to get laaaaaiiiddd. Says things he thinks sound good. Maybe hopefully now his wokeness will help him get a girlfriend.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 10:46 PM
6

Even the lefty guys can’t pretend anymore. This has been the problem for too long. Men's Rights was mocked and associated with "misogyny" by a dishonest media and an activist-controlled academia; echoed by terrified leftists who mistook "progressiveism" for the misguided idea of penance. I'm glad to hear many of these men have had enough. The root of the problem has been the media and academia. Fortunately enough people have spoken up and sacrificed themselves and their reputation, so that we al…
/r/MensRights15/02/20 08:05 PM
6

Gender Studies classes are like this: "Something something men's fault. Something something patriarchy." "Women are just as strong and can do anything just like a man. Get over it." "Women are victims of men." "If a man makes a bad decision, it's Toxic Masculinity. If a woman makes a bad decision, it's a man's fault." "Equality! ...But only when it benefits women. Otherwise, not our purview."
/r/MensRights14/02/20 07:31 PM
11

Every man can cry, and it's okay. Until a woman comes along and makes fun of that man, tells him to "man up", then wonders why men never show their emotions. Toxic Femininity at its best. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 03:58 PM
29

The United States is the rapiest country in the world! And in Africa, apparently either nobody lives there, or there are never any rapes. We should be more like Africa!!
/r/MensRights11/02/20 03:22 PM
3

It's so completely ridiculous it's hard to even imagine. The number of contradictions in that article are really hard to keep up with.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 03:05 PM
8

Yes, your brain would probably explode reading this. It's even more absurd than the headline.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 06:08 AM
2

Think of how many more female recruits we could have then.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 03:44 AM
18

Feminists: "My Body, My Choice!!" Also Feminists: "Quit whining about circumcision anteater wannabe!"
/r/MensRights10/02/20 11:57 PM
2

Thank you. It's no longer about equality or the truth. It's about acquiescence of a political ideology; and that is that everything "male" is "bad". These are cultural underpinnings of Authoritarian Marxism infecting academia, our political system, and our media. The end goal is not equality. No, that would be extension mean stumping for men's rights every once in a while, like you did (and thank you for that). It's about political obedience and intimidation. Hence the threat, "you're not a 'rea…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 10:52 PM
3

Ah, now you've uncovered the fallacy. If "too drunk to consent" means "she was raped". By that very same logic, that girl raped Brock Turner for example. Brock Turner was blackout drunk. Doesn't that then mean he was "too drunk to consent", and therefore he was raped? But these logical consistencies are lost completely on feminism. Feminism drops buzz phrases like this all the time, and the idea is they are to be used as a weapon of intimidation and silence.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 03:41 PM
4

The media considers everything right of extreme leftism as "misogynist". For example, I keep reading that Jordan Peterson is a "misogynist". Which is complete and utter nonsense. Also: what is your opinion on homosexuality? I'm not sure what you mean by this question. I don't really have an opinion. Why should I have an opinion about someone else's sexuality?
/r/MensRights09/02/20 03:33 PM
20

This is yet another case of rape culture at work This is "yet another" case of rape culture at work. A woman beats a man. Claims he was beating her, ruins part of his career, threatens to leave with large swathes of his fortune, and nearly gets away. But this is "yet another" case of rape culture at work. What is wrong with these people?
/r/MensRights09/02/20 05:57 AM
31

Something something wage gap, and this is how they make up for it. My goodness when did young women become such entitled little brats?
/r/MensRights09/02/20 05:51 AM
18

Well, no. No one even mentioned I had copied it word for word. My teacher didn't notice. My parents. Nobody noticed. If they had noticed, I would have gotten 0% and probably suspended too. It had nothing to do with that. My teacher didn't even notice.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 01:22 AM
23

I was a high school student in 95-99, and I regularly experienced misandry. My most famous example is when I borrowed my female friend's paper, and copied it word for word from start to finish. She got an 85%. I got an 53%. When I asked how that was possible i got in trouble citing, "I should know better.". Got yelled at. Got detention. Got home, my parents yelled at me as my teacher had called them. And nobody even gave a shit I had copied an entire paper exactly word for word and the grades we…
/r/MensRights09/02/20 12:46 AM
5

Once again, it's the man's fault.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 10:05 PM
1

It is NEVER okay to hit a woman. It is okay to hit a man though, apparently.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 02:04 AM
3

"Believe Women."
/r/MensRights02/02/20 07:40 PM
10

This is a repost from another article, but archived, so as not to give the CBC any clicks. Here's my commentary about one point in the article: Since September, Kiona has been looking more closely at why boys feel entitled to ask for nude photos, and why girls feel compelled to send them. This sentence intrigued me. Why do boys feel "entitled" to "ask". Asking is, by definition, asking for consent. There is no sense of "entitlement" there. It's an ask. Girls are free to say no. I can understand …
/r/MensRights26/01/20 09:14 PM
2

Shit, you're right. How do I do that? Anyway, our government funds these nincompoops forever, so I'm not sure how much effect that would have.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 06:05 PM
6

But men asking for it, is bad. But women doing it, is empowering. It's just all so confusing.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 05:25 PM
6

The other thing that bothers me about this article, is it's all women's voices, all trying to define masculinity. This is a typical maneuver by the CBC. They open up a discussion about gender. Then they blame men and boys. They throw around the word "toxic". They claim much of this is due to men "not supporting" or "not expressing" their feelings. Said by women. Can you imagine a room full of men sitting around deciding how women and girls should act navigating this complicated world? Or imagine…
/r/MensRights26/01/20 05:18 PM
16

Since September, Kiona has been looking more closely at why boys feel entitled to ask for nude photos, and why girls feel compelled to send them. This sentence intrigued me. Why do boys feel "entitled" to "ask". Asking is, by definition, asking for consent. There is no sense of "entitlement" there. It's an ask. Girls are free to say no. I can understand the pressure. I know some girls send a joke picture instead (like a picture of their dog or something). It just seems to me the way the word "en…
/r/MensRights26/01/20 05:09 PM
1

#Equality
/r/MensRights25/01/20 07:19 PM
11

When men develop spaces for men, women either fight to get in, or denounce it as being "misogynistic". Sometimes it feels like we aren't allowed to have men's spaces anymore.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 07:18 PM
5

\5. Men not opening up about issues is an example of Toxic Masculinity!
/r/MensRights25/01/20 07:09 PM
37

In January 2019, Ryerson student newspaper The Eyeopener reported that RSU executives had allegedly spent up to $250,000 of student tuition funds on food, clothing, and club purchases through company credit cards. Ah, yes. The future politicians of tomorrow. I see they've already become quite adept at spending other people's money.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 02:51 PM
2

We went from "Believe All Women" to "Women Are Perfect" pretty fucking quick.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 10:32 PM
2

Equality
/r/MensRights23/01/20 10:20 PM
8

Great post. I wasn't aware of many of these points. There's something similar with the argument "women didn't have the right to vote". It's always presented as an example of the patriarchy, and of oppression. But the reality is much more complicated than that. At that same time, most men weren't also allowed to vote. Voting Rights were restricted to very few property owners (mostly men), but there were cases of widowed or single women who owned property who voted much earlier than the usually pr…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 05:02 PM
2

I had thought this was the case for years. Especially in psychology. Have you ever noticed how difficult it is to find a male therapist? Yet, you'll never hear about government initiatives trying to "get more men in health and medicine". It's almost as though equality only counts when women fall behind.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 03:38 PM
2

Ketchup and mustard?
/r/MensRights14/01/20 03:49 AM
14

Ah. CNN shilling for the corporate Democrats again. This is why we don't trust the left. I hope everyone understands that. CNN is garbage and the inner core of the Democratic Party is corrupt, intellectual dishonest corporate boot lickers. If Bernie Sanders were the leader of the Democrats, I would still disagree with their politics. But at least I would have some respect for them.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 03:42 AM
1

She stole his dog? Like, what the hell?
/r/MensRights14/01/20 03:33 AM
6

It's not even true. I'm terrified in a room full of women.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 03:26 AM
71

Awww... Poor baby. It's almost as though this is the world you created.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 03:24 AM
1

Interesting. I didn't know there was a term for that. Yeah, I've always had an issue with it too. Like sporting events or whatever. In any event, I'm not sure why I'm supposed to be okay with peeing in front of women. I just don't want to do that.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 11:38 AM
17

The restaurant should probably change their name too. "5 Male of center self-identifying individuals" would be more appropriate than the obviously sexist "5 Guys".
/r/MensRights10/01/20 10:14 PM
8

The other day I wandered into a washroom similar to this. It was a Men's Washroom converted. Women were lined up using the stalls. They waved me through and invited me to "go ahead" and use the urinals. Urinals, which were not ten feet away from multiple women lined up inside the door. I hesitated. Someone said "go ahead". I was shy. I mumbled something about not feeling comfortable peeing in front of all these women watching me. They looked at me like I was the asshole. A girl said, "why can't …
/r/MensRights10/01/20 10:13 PM
144

Because women don't want other people invading their safe space. But they are okay with invading other people's safe space.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 10:07 PM
12

Male colleague from across the room: alternatively maybe men just suck What a little whipped bitch.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:27 PM
1

I know many here are skeptical that the left can ever be convinced to treat men better. I understand your skepticism, and I'm not saying it will be easy, but I think it's necessary to try. I wish you luck in your quest. But I will not be joining you. I am no longer negotiating with the left.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 01:56 AM
1

"Men's Rights? You stand up for 'Maninism'!?!? Lol!!" "But you already have all the rights! What's wrong with you you misogynist!?!?"
/r/MensRights03/01/20 04:43 PM
10

That's a great graph. Over the weekend a woman was complaining about the Wage Gap. I made the tongue and cheek reply, "well, that's because men are better workers and deserve to get paid more." I said it tongue and cheek and got a laugh, but I saw her recoil a bit. Then I offered girls do better in school and academia than men and boys. She immediately said (without irony I may add): "Well, that's because girls are better students than boys." I nodded and said, "it's interesting you can believe …
/r/MensRights03/01/20 04:33 PM
2

Douglas Murray summarizes this quite well. I will try to paraphrase. Are women equal? Or victims? Or are they better? Messages coming out of feminist camps greatly differ. We've all heard "women are equal!". Okay, no problem. But then we've also heard women are victims. "Believe all women" is a great example of that. It immediately sets the precedent that "all women are victims, therefore need protection". How can women be equal if they're victims? But it doesn't just stop there. Women are bette…
/r/MensRights03/01/20 04:28 PM
1

I hate pulling this one out, but I've used this argument sometimes: "Statistically speaking, black people commit more crimes than white people. Therefore, do you feel law enforcement should be skewed in order to disproportionately target black people?" Of course, most people recoil in horror and say no that would be racist. Then I nod and say, "ah, so you do understand prejudice."
/r/MensRights03/01/20 04:21 PM
2

Hey guys. Hey guys. Hey guys. It is never okay to hit anyone a woman. It is of course okay to hit a guy.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 04:42 AM
2

This is so depressing, I don't know how you can even stand it. I wish you all the best my friend. I guess all anyone can say is you're not alone. There are many out there who love and support you, and who want the best for you and your family. Best of luck to you.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 07:11 PM
4

Of course they would. It would be on CNN for months. Breathless whispers about "hate" and "bigotry". They'd find a way to pin it on Trump as well. Like something he said in one of his speeches which was a "dog whistle" or whatever. It's a complete, massive, gaping double standard.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 05:27 AM
7

The thing is, this doesn’t seem like a gender issue. What are you talking about? If boys had attacked a girl like this we'd never be hearing the end of it. It just so happened that girls hit him. Yes. And they should be reprimanded severely for it. But we all know they won't. Because... #Equality. Or something like that. By wearing a maga hat, this kid is showing a pretty big lack of self awareness. No. Pull up a chair and have a seat. People are allowed to have different political beliefs. Just…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 04:03 AM
4

I get your point (but disagree with you) about not wanting to align with Trump or the Republicans but goddammit man. This boy got beaten up at school for his political beliefs. That's literally what we're all about. Standing up for boys and men who can't defend themselves. Don't think this is about supporting Trump. This is about supporting a poor kid who had his ass kicked at school. And at least a part of that is he's a boy. If we're not going to stick up for him, who are we going to stick up …
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:58 AM
5

Can you imagine a video of a group of Trump Supporters beating up a Democrat Supporter? We would never hear the end of it. It would be front page news for months. But this? I didn't hear about this. Thank you for bringing it to our attention. Further proof the main stream media is biased.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:41 AM
2

Because "Equality". Because it's (current year). Because whenever men are more represented than women, it's society's problem. When women do better than men, it's because women are better and it's men's fault. This is the narrative anyway.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 07:58 PM
6

Great observation. Christina Hoff Sommers wrote a great book called "The War On Boys" almost 20 years ago now talking about this subject. In the book: Teachers tend to inflate the grades of female students, and deflate the grades of male students. (As demonstrated by studies in which they remove or change the names of the students). The reason for this tends to be teachers grade girls on "effort"; whereas they tend to grade boys on "ability". This is especially true of female teachers, who exhib…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 03:55 PM
1

Imagine if men dismissed women and girls' opinions like that. "Angry white women are scared when a man speaks the truth. They should learn about their privilege. Stay in their lane. Just listen. They aren't allowed to have an opinion about anything because of toxic femininity."
/r/MensRights13/12/19 03:42 PM
1

You basically just described how I feel everyday in my life.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 03:37 PM
1

"Yup. Women tend to try not to traumatize others with their suicide." Wow. That might be the dumbest thing I've ever read.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 04:54 PM
19

I've been hit by just about every ex-girlfriend I've had. I had a girlfriend once who literally attacked me. Scratching, biting, hitting, kicking, screaming, the whole bit. Breaking dishes, throwing things at me as I tried to run away. I managed to leave the apartment, and came back to a completely trashed apartment. Hundreds of dollars in damage. I told me parents and friends about it and they were like, "I hope she doesn't do that again." If I had done that, I'd be in jail.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 04:50 PM
12

"Scrubs" And "If I were a boy" I fucking hate that last song. Beyonce makes it sound as if being a boy is the easiest thing in the world, and has the temerity to claim if she "were a boy", she would "be different". Whatever the fuck that means.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 04:55 PM
5

Ms. Judge, who has studied feminist issues ... And there you have it. Once poisoned by the neo Marxist academic political agenda, one starts to see everything through "the gender lens". She sees micro aggressions in children's books. How dare children's books make clever jokes told by a male character. How dare they. Naturally, if the genders were reversed, she wouldn't have any issue with this.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 04:53 PM
2

I've heard that line about cheating as well. "If a woman cheats, there must be a reason." As if that somehow explains everything. As if that somehow absolves the cheater and all of femininity of any or all sins.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 04:46 PM
2

You need to read: "The Madness Of Crowds" by Douglas Murray. Everything will become clear after that.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 04:43 PM
1

Jesus. People like that actually exist?
/r/MensRights15/11/19 03:21 AM
1

Lol. That's exactly what I wrote. Verbatim! Lol
/r/MensRights08/11/19 03:22 PM
2

What. The. Fuck.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 03:21 PM
1

He wants to get laid sooooo bad.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:25 AM
3

The struggle is real folks.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 05:19 PM
4

Also, has she ever slept with a woman? Lol. The lack of self-awareness here is astounding.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 05:15 PM
12

Her story helps explain what draws people into this movement, and the misogyny that drives it. ... And there it is. The ubiquitous "misogyny". Men = Bad = Misogynist= Alt-right = White Supremacist. Oh, look at that everyone. We're men, therefore, we are Nazis.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 04:00 AM
1

"I would never make someone feel lower just because their beliefs are different than my own." Unless it is a man. Evidently.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 02:39 PM
6

#SaveOurGirls
/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:10 AM
2

"No one should ever tell a woman what her rights are about what she decides to do with her body!!" (Loud cheers from the crowd). "How about men? Can men have a say as well?" (Crickets).
/r/MensRights11/10/19 05:58 PM
2

You're absolutely right. It's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 04:05 AM
5

Because it's okay to advocate for violence when it's a man.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 04:02 AM
13

Right, but don't with. It's only an urge to violence against men. So it's okay. Lol. Don't forget. This broadcaster received over a billion dollars in public funding every year.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:42 PM
51

From the feminist being interviewed: I ask people to imagine — now I'm using this word imagine, and I'm underlining it three times — a scenario in which we kill a certain number of men every week. How many men must we kill until patriarchy sits across the table from us and says, "OK, stop. What must we do, so that you can stop this culling?" I'm pretty sure that speaks for itself. This is an article, presented by our national public broadcaster, using tax payer funds in order to bring you interv…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 09:27 PM
53

Toilet seat left up. Solution: put toilet seat down. Rofl!! You actually made me laugh out loud reading this. Thank you my friend. You're totally right. It's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 03:48 PM
10

Help! Bank fees are oppressive and a tool of the patriarchy!! Aaaaahhhhh!!!!
/r/MensRights01/10/19 03:47 PM
13

Feminism is no longer about gender equality. It is gender discrimination and its manner is violent and hateful. This pretty much sums it up. Brief and to the point. We should all practice this line for when we get info cocktail parties and they ask us why we do not support feminism.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 03:06 PM
4

A report from the World Health Organization points to three reasons men don’t live as long: the way men work (they endure greater “exposure to physical and chemical hazards”), So... How would embracing Feminism help with this? Men have to work. Men are making society run. You're welcome by the way. their willingness to take risks (thanks to “male norms of risk-taking and adventure”) This is also why more men are entrepreneurs, and why more men are CEOs. Higher risk, higher reward. How would embr…
/r/MensRights15/09/19 03:31 PM
3

"Women are just as strong and can anything just like a man. Get over it." "Oh, but we're going to give them more money, to make things even."
/r/MensRights13/09/19 03:27 PM
1

In Canada we the something called The Employment Equity Act The idea is to give preferential hiring in the public sector to the following four groups: Women, people with disabilities, Aboriginal peoples, and visible minorities. If you're good at reading, that means everyone except white men. It begs two questions. The first is obvious. If we're giving preferential treatment to everyone except for white men, then why are we calling white men privileged? Privileged how? Take a walk in downtown Tor…
/r/MensRights12/09/19 11:44 PM
1

How about we put a graph in a textbook showing levels of intelligence by race. At the top of the pyramid are Asians. Second are Caucasians. At the bottom are African Americans. Do you agree or disagree? Can you see how this might be problematic? The point is, we aren't supposed to judge people based on sex or skin colour. At least, that's what I was told. Yet, the very first thing we're asked to do here, is base our discussion on sex and skin colour. We believe this is sexist and racist, and it …
/r/MensRights11/09/19 04:07 PM
3

"It feels like you have an agenda". Lol. Of course I have an agenda! And? What's your question? Yes! I have an agenda! To hopefully inform you and demonstrate some reality to you and Feminism. To offer a counter point to the silly idea that "all men have privilege". To demonstrate another perspective. How dare I do that. How dare I offer facts as a manner of proving my point. How dare I!! Reeeeeee!!
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:34 PM
10

You are a legend my friend. Keep updating us. We're very interested in this story. It's good to know activism has now officially made its way into our school curriculum and is now indoctrinating our youth. Let's hope through awareness and exposure more Canadians can work together and eradicate our schools of this cancer. Thank you for the information! Have a great day. Keep us updated please! :)
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:30 PM
23

Or History. Remember when History was a subject? Remember how somehow they've reduced it to only one History requirement throughout your entire high school career?
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:27 PM
1

That's a great link, thank you. For anyone interested in reading, page 100-104 is the topic we're looking at. It's quite revealing. This is an official Canadian public school curriculum. Holy fuck.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:20 PM
18

I crossposted this in rMetacanada, and it's blowing up: https://np.reddit.com/r/metacanada/comments/d1wqpd/this_is_what_were_taught_in_canadian_public_school Thank you so much for sharing this. It's very important this is brought to our attention. Has anyone tried to post this in rCanada yet?
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:14 PM
4

Can we find out which school or city? Or maybe even province? This needs to be posted in rCanada. Although, I'm pretty sure the activist mods who have taken over that sub will censor fairly quickly.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 10:19 PM
7

It says "male" though...
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:50 PM
398

Holy fuck. Do you mind if I cross post this? This isn't education. This is political activism indoctrination.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:49 PM
11

"Privilege is invisible to those who have it". Michael Kimmel, male feminist and groper. This quote is usually used by Feminists said to men. The stupidest thing about this quote, is the women who say this never seem to be aware of their own privilege. Oh, the irony. It's like they have zero capacity for self-reflection. They are incapable of imagining the possibly they might actually have to work on themselves.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 04:32 AM
8

We always hear "men have to be better". We never hear "women have to be better".
/r/MensRights02/09/19 04:23 AM
3

Well. That seems like a movie I want to see. Lol.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 05:13 PM
3

Nobody cares, nobody gives a shit. You can pour your heart out to someone, and they won't give a shit. You can explain and cry and desperately plead for help or guidance. Or even support. And no one gives a shit. Then, when a woman breaks her nail, you'll see 75 people rush up and try to help her. If you break up, it's always your fault. It's never the woman's fault. It's always "that poor girl". It's always "he'll regret that decision, asshole." It's the fact we're judged on our results. Women …
/r/MensRights28/08/19 11:29 PM
18

Good. Fuck Gillette.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 08:17 PM
4

The future is female. Edit: My comment was tongue and cheek. I've seen many young girls wearing "The Future Is Female" t-shirts. Is this the future they had envisioned?
/r/MensRights21/08/19 12:24 AM
6

So you'll notice that exactly none of these initiatives have anything to do with helping men. Alberta Council of Women's Shelters will receive $212,000 to promote sports figures as role models to increase awareness of gender-based violence. That organization will work with the Canadian Football League leading up to the Grey Cup. "Gender-based violence" is code for men beating up women. These people don't give a fuck if a woman beats up a man. -Catalyst Canada, a non-profit that helps support wom…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 08:00 PM
12

Our country's current government is a fucking joke.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 07:40 PM
1

Just out of curiosity, are you a man or a woman?
/r/MensRights18/08/19 07:34 PM
6

Well men don't think they're victims all the time. There goes that theory.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 02:39 PM
38

This feeling the professor is describing is something a woman could never understand. Women are already given so much attention and encouragement everywhere they go. They just think that is normal. They think life is like that for everyone. They complain about getting too much attention. Which is understandable in their position. It's very difficult to convince them what the other extreme looks like.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 02:18 PM
52

Self-Made Man by Nora Vincent talks about this. She lived her life as a man for one year. She said the thing which really stood out for her was how people "didn't really notice" her when she was a man. She said as a female she would get little smilies, nods, acknowledgement wherever she went. As a male, people barely looked at her. People would just walk right by without even looking at her. Nobody cared.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 02:14 PM
2

Because you guys need to get a grip and quit feeling like such victims all the time. But women don't? Are you suggesting women are victims all of the time?
/r/MensRights18/08/19 02:11 PM
6

Welcome to manhood my friend.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 02:09 PM
2

Well Google says so, so it must be right. Sigh... It's just all so tiring.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 06:09 PM
3

I was told that Sweden is a socialist paradise, and the political model we should mold our country after. Was I wrong about that?
/r/MensRights13/08/19 03:13 PM
1

I completely agree.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 02:25 PM
2

Well said well said. I'm a few years older than you, and I feel very similarly. Also similar experience with women in their 20s who wouldn't give me the time of day, but are now suddenly calling and texting just "to see how I'm doing". Women are attracted to wealth, status and power. Many of them won't acknowledge that of course, but that's the truth. This is perhaps why as we get older, and accumulate more wealth and status, women become more attracted to us. It could also be their biological c…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 10:24 PM
2

Confirming my hypothesis. Not all of them are bad. But I completely understand and feel the same way. I hope you are doing well my friend. Good luck to you.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 08:21 PM
3

That's exactly correct. I feel like some of them are starting to come to this realization. But the Feminist maw continues to push the ideology and silences opposition. It is odd the exact same reasons they "hate" us (for our masculinity), are exactly the same reasons they love us. I hope more women realize this going forward.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 08:20 PM
1

We've made several other Canada subreddits. Obviously the one called rCanada is still seen as the default.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:12 PM
5

I totally agree. I hear you my friend. I hear ya.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:11 PM
3

I agree. There seems to be a war happening on the Internet right now. The War of Truth. The War of the Narrative. In Canada for example, we have a group of dishonest activist individuals who control our national subreddit (rCanada). They target and censor any "red pill" user or article. They are in the process of narrative control. Hundreds if not thousands of accounts have been banned at this point. My own account was targeted and permanently banned after I brought attention to controversial Bi…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 03:31 PM
2

This is terrifying. Now I'm having a hard time sleep as well. Good luck my friend.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 03:34 AM
1

I suppose in the grand scheme of things one could say that really nothing is all that important. In the context of what we are discussing here, it is important. Significant even.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 11:37 PM
2

It shows the flaw in the feminist narrative. This is important because this flawed ideology is currently being pushed by government and the media to form even more biased legislation against men.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 03:35 PM
1

https://www.dailywire.com/news/50053/us-soccer-releases-fact-sheet-showing-womens-team-ashe-schow
/r/MensRights01/08/19 03:32 PM
15

Boys will be boys I guess. It's almost as though when you insult your entire main customer base, they react accordingly. It looks like Gillette will "have to do better".
/r/MensRights01/08/19 03:23 PM
1

But what you're quoting is the bonus payout from FIFA, which has nothing to do with the salaries granted by USSF. Of course it does. What are you talking about? Bonuses are a part of salary. What are you talking about? WE have control over what the players get from the World Cup. They would get the same percentages they get now. So the women would have to start earning less as a function of the percentage you are suggesting.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 06:05 AM
1

Be careful what you wish for. That system will favour the men by a long shot. In fact, it has now been noted from several different sources: “Women earned 13% of generated revenue for the World Cup/ Men earned 9%!! Men generated $9B in revenue/Women $73M hence more money for Men!” In other words, as a percentage of the revenue generated by the women’s vs the men’s team, the women players were paid more – 13% for women vs. 9% for men. https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/ilona-schumicky/us-womens…
/r/MensRights31/07/19 11:31 PM
0

Lol. Wait, are you a woman? Okay... I see where this is coming from. My apologies. Hey look, everyone wants everything to be fair. But is this really where you want to make your stand? Millionaires complaining they aren't making as much as other millionaires? Is your argument that as the women generated more income in the past two years that they should be paid more? Or is your argument that they should be paid equally - exactly dollar for dollar the same - as the men? How can you calculate how …
/r/MensRights31/07/19 09:33 PM
0

Lol. The lawsuit is against USSF, not FIFA. Learn how to read. Cool. And guess what? The USSF disagrees with you too. Why? Because you're wrong. It must be frustrating and embarrassing when you lose an argument that badly.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 07:12 PM
1

Hmmm. Interesting. I've never met anyone who carried both of those opinions simultaneously. It seems inconsistent to me. The "anti-vaxxers"I know are also against circumcision.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:37 PM
2

Okay. I mean... We'll probably get called "racist" anyway. So I suppose it doesn't matter what we actually say. Cheers mate.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:35 PM
0

I see. So we should just ignore that "FIFA shit". I see. We should "just ignore" the entire fulcrum of the argument, because it doesn't fit with your narrative. Sure. That sounds like a really empirical way of dealing with things. We are dealing with SOCCER. Maybe you've heard of it before. Soccer isn't played in a vacuum, and obviously international prize money, sponsorships and pay structures have plenty to do with it. But tell you what. If you don't like it, why don't you encourage the women …
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:34 PM
1

Lol. Again, wrong. That's not how that works. There are signed collective bargaining agreements, and these were the results. The prize money men win is significantly higher. The viewership for men's soccer is significant higher. The overall interest in men's soccer is significantly higher. This isn't just a "United States" thing. To only limit this to domestic viewership is dumb. To limit your historical claims to "the last two years" is not only fucking stupid, it's extremely dishonest. Further…
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:18 PM
3

Should we say "black"? I feel racist saying black. Although, I don't know why.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:10 PM
0

Did you read your own article? The soccer federation denied the claims in the women’s lawsuit, arguing in a May court filing that the pay differential between the men and women players is “based on differences in aggregate revenue generated by the different teams The USSF points out that if this calculation is extended to fiscal 2015 — in order to include a men’s World Cup cycle — the men’s team brought in $10.8 million more for the federation. In other words, if just look at 2016-2018 when the …
/r/MensRights31/07/19 03:01 PM
46

Excellent. I've tried explaining this to people. It never goes well. They start accusing me of being a "racist". Probably just for citing "African Americans" in a way that goes against the narrative.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 02:16 PM
0

I'm simply demonstrating how men's soccer is much more popular than women's soccer. You haven't offered any evidence of any kind. Get your shit right you dumbfuck. You sound like the dumbfuck right now.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 02:02 PM
1

Wrong. Men's soccer earns many times more than women's soccer. It isn't even close. More than that, women's soccer, as it is, wouldn't even exist, without men's soccer. [Fifa’s own analysis says the 2015 Women’s World Cup was watched by 764m people while the 2014 men’s World Cup was watched by 3.2bn. That's five times as many viewers. Television rights, sponsors, ticket revenue, all vastly skewed in favour of men. You'll have to provide a source to back up your claim now, which is a ludicrous cl…
/r/MensRights31/07/19 02:39 AM
4

Well that's interesting. That seems illogical. I'm guessing that's for religious reasons. Would that match what you've witnessed?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 10:30 PM
1

That's right! Lol.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 10:09 PM
2

That's true. Apparently bringing men into female-dominated jobs is sexist now. Yeah, that's ridiculous. It perfectly undermines the hypocrisy of the Feminist position. It isn't about "equality". If it were about equality we would hear about it when it goes the other way.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 10:09 PM
1

Ummm... Wrong. The men generate much more wealth than the women. It isn't even close. Read the article.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 10:06 PM
10

Anti-vaxxers would be against unnecessary medical procedures, and would encourage a healthier, more "natural" lifestyle. Therefore they would also most certainly also be anti-circumcision.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 01:26 PM
6

"I'm angry because reasons. So I will direct my angry towards men." This attitude displayed by many young women in today's society is troubling to say the least. Fortunately, it isn't all women. Some have started rejecting this narrative which is good. But for society to encourage, and to applaud such wanton displays of gender-based hatred is reprehensible. Young women of today should not be so hasty to wade into the world of man-hating. The world is already complicated and depressing enough as …
/r/MensRights30/07/19 01:21 PM
2

While I agree you are right, I'm not sure if that's the point. For me, the point is the men generate more income. This is probably because the product is better as you pointed out. More people are willing to pay more money to watch men perform at sports. There are fields where women generate more income, like the Arts, modeling, porn. When that happens, women get paid more than their male counterparts. I don't see feminists complaining about that.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 01:16 PM
112

"Here is what they cannot deny: For every game a man plays on the MNT, he makes a higher base salary payment than a woman on the WNT. For every comparable win or tie, his bonus is higher. That is the very definition of gender discrimination. No. That is the very definition of economics. The men generate more wealth. That is why they earn more money. Which part of this is confusing?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 08:34 AM
5

This is the new reality. I've seen this in many places (usually bars). It's a double standard. Men aren't allowed to have their own safe spaces. If they do, that's "misogyny". Women must have their own safe spaces. Because despite being as strong and as capable as men, get over it, they still need protection (figure that one out). I don't think it's right. If we start having three bathrooms, fine. Or if all bathrooms are non gender specific, fine. But the picture you've just shown demonstrates a…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 02:17 PM
1

I understand. Here in Canada anyway, both parties have drifted so far left that voting for the Conservative Party now is almost like voting for a center / center-left party. Even forgetting about that. I truly believe for Americans, the Republicans are the correct answer here. I never would have voted for or condoned the Republicans in the past. But now, I think we have no other option. At the very least, the Democrats need to hear the message that men no longer feel represented by their party, …
/r/MensRights14/06/19 01:54 PM
15

The US women’s team scored more goals in one game than the men’s team has in every World Cup since 2006 combined. Sigh... Have you ever heard anything so disingenuous in your life? Men are paid more, because more people watch their games. They generate more revenue. In fact, they generate so much revenue the salaries for the women are probably already paid for by the men. It has nothing to do with sexism.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 04:24 AM
3

This is the only logical response. I'm sorry folks, he's right. If you care about real equality, you absolutely must not vote for the Democrats.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 08:38 PM
2

It sounds like we mostly agree.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 08:35 PM
4

Republican policies pull support systems out from under poor men and tell them to deal with it. This is more of a political philosophy. The idea is the social safety net actually puts more people into poverty than it helps. Thomas Sowell is someone to read concerning this. Republican policies have incarcerated more men with more disproportionate sentences than any country has in history. I agree. In the past. The war on drugs for example. Republican policies regarding incarceration in the 80s an…
/r/MensRights12/06/19 03:30 AM
6

I think we kind of agree here. You agree with me about the "corporate Democrats" as you've called them. This was my point; in this current incarnation of the Democrat Party, they must not be allowed to gain power. I have no real issue with Bernie or his supporters. If he were the leader I might not hold the same opinion as I do now. But I have news for you. The current leadership and inner circle in the Democratic Party is not Bernie, nor his supporters. And in fact, they are working against you…
/r/MensRights11/06/19 08:44 PM
5

How about President Trump claiming it is difficult to be a boy in today's environment? He's the only political candidate who has come anywhere close to addressing men's issues.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 01:51 PM
0

The Democrats are very dishonest people and would say anything if they thought it could get them into power. Do not give them an inch. Do not even for a second believe they actually care about men and boys. Think of academia, how it is tilted in favour of females, nearly universally by democratic professors. Think of the candidates. Mazie Hirono who told men they should just "shut up". Cory Booker who pontificated like a blowhard Hollywood actor sanctimoniously claiming to want to examine all ev…
/r/MensRights11/06/19 01:50 PM
4

Democrats and Republicans agree on few core issues, but in regards to men, they are exactly on the same page. I don't agree. As you said, Democrats are interested in pandering to females. As such, they will create institutions which will lead to further discrimination and marginalization of men. You're right the Republicans don't really address men's issues. However, already by not giving more advantages to females, they demonstrate true equality, which is ultimately something we are trying to a…
/r/MensRights11/06/19 01:37 PM
2

Probably because they've banned everyone they disagree with.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 11:13 PM
6

This is what toxic femininity looks like.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 03:00 PM
3

If this had been a man she would be in jail for probably the rest of her life, and never get to see her daugther again. By the way, she was a daughter? I shudder at that thought.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 02:59 PM
1

And if the men are overly flirtatious, it's obnoxious or creepy. Besides, isn't this type of "cold" behaviour what women want? I thought they "just wanted to be treated like people". Well, that's how people treat people. You can't have it both ways.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 08:01 PM
4

Guys, the office temperature is too cold. This is clearly oppressive. This is clearly a sign of the evil patriarchy. Not only that, but climate change! Climate change everyone! Men in suits are not only patriarchal oppressive evil task masters, but they are also ruining the planet at the same time! Thank you CBC for bringing our awareness to this issue. From now on I'll keep my thermostat at 22 instead of the repressive 21. And I will be sure to do my activist part and shame anyone who dares wea…
/r/MensRights30/05/19 05:16 PM
3

I agree. It's the dumbest thing in the world. I've even heard feminists make the claim, "if women had the chance to fight in the wars, they would have!" Ha. Yeah. Sure. I've also heard, "at least men had the choice!" (As though all of the boys and men who went to war "signed up" for it). Facepalm One thing I am thankful for is I never have to fight in a war. Probably because of the millions of brave men who did. We have an entire generation of young people these days who not only completely igno…
/r/MensRights29/05/19 08:33 PM
1

I suppose I was speaking more in generalities. But one example at the top of my head is Prohibition. The Christian Women's Temperance Union was the driving force behind implementing the 18th Amendment (Prohibition). They argued alcohol causes more problems for society. This led to legislation, then bootlegging, then finally to all out drive-by shooting gang warfare. This isn't to suggest women are responsible for Prohibition, or the negativity which came as a result. But what often happens is wo…
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:32 PM
4

Wars have been started by the whispers of women.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 02:45 AM
2

Ignore the Lady's Whisper Network?
/r/MensRights28/05/19 09:41 PM
12

Wow. Written in 1971. That's a bang on assessment in my humble opinion. One thing for the younger men here. It might not be so apparent now. But as you get older, you really start to notice it. I realize now years later some of the things women have done behind my back. Like I could never understand why that person suddenly got so distant with me. Years later I uncovered because a girl told her something about me behind my back. As it was done behind my back, I couldn't defend myself. I didn't e…
/r/MensRights28/05/19 07:49 PM
2

Don't be depressed. Some women think this way, but there are extremists in every social group. I understand this. I just feel misunderstood. Villainized. An outcast in society. Like society doesn't want or need me anymore. Like people want to see my fail. Laugh at me. Laugh at my mistakes. Hope I don't have kids. Just "go away". I really don't think feminism, or women in general for that matter, have realized what an impact Modern Feminism and a hijacked #MeToo Movement has meant to decent men a…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 06:41 PM
6

I quoted from the book. Which... You have to wonder. A book as "woke" as this, assuming baby's genders!? How dare they!!
/r/MensRights27/05/19 06:18 PM
2

No, I'm not surprised. But I am appalled. Talk about starting the indoctrination and social engineering at an early age. "Mommy, what's a Feminist?" "Well honey, Feminism is for everyone. Just like this book says. All good boys are Feminists. Just like Feminist Baby. Good boy." Shudder
/r/MensRights27/05/19 03:23 PM
1

It sounds like you're underestimating your own looks. You're a personal trainer? Heck, you have like 9 out of 10 guys beat right there. Also, are you tall? I bet you're tall. It goes a long way. Karaoke nights are always the sloppiest. That's where you go to see women descend into the pit of debauchery.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 02:50 PM
14

I saw this book at the bookstore the other day. It made me want to curl up into a ball and disappear from this world. "Feminist Baby knows it's okay to cry!" "Feminist Baby takes his turn!" "Feminist Baby is here to say... Feminism is for everyone - let's start today!" Marketed to kids who probably aren't even old enough to know what a girl or woman is.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 02:42 PM
2

Thank you for saying this... But like. I have a question. How long did it take you realize men are human beings too? Do all radical feminists think like this? That makes incredibly depressed. It's almost like people haven't heard a single word we've been saying. And people wonder why men and boys are lagging behind and leaving society.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 02:30 PM
3

Do you have a link or story to the protest? Thank you!
/r/MensRights26/05/19 03:47 PM
11

Did they! Wow. It must be ultra confusing for them when a woman is the center of the controversy. Thank you!
/r/MensRights26/05/19 03:46 PM
22

What an absolutely fantastic speech. I wonder what the reaction to it was. Is she currently under attack from "progressives" for being "misogynist" or some other vague poorly defined term? It wouldn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 03:09 PM
9

As I understand it, the women's rights movement was meant to equalize the sexes when it came to employment, wages and opportunities, not to give females the right to be equally boorish. That's where you were mistaken. Modern Feminism is about female superiority and advantages for females and their allies.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 04:19 PM
1

It's almost as though there's one set of rules for men, and a different set of rules for women.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 03:45 PM
1

Can Weir speak French? I'm not sure. I don't think so. Not fluently anyway. I'm pretty sure he's from the Prairies. Can Singh speak French?
/r/MensRights24/05/19 07:16 PM
2

What this article fails to mention is MP Christine Moore, the one who sent the email claiming she "had heard" other women talking about Erin Weir: Also has an allegation of sexual harrassment against her. You could not make this stuff up. The very same person who made the accusation (by means of unidentified third party whispers), has an allegation against her. After her allegation, she then holds a press conference saying: "I have done nothing but cry [since the story came out.] It's terrible t…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 05:27 PM
5

Yup. You pretty much nailed it. Have you posted this in rCanada yet? Of course, I'm sure if you tried, it would be quietly removed. The Mods of rCanada are doing their best to suppress and censor all opinions they disagree with. I'm sure this one would be no exception. Big Feminism continues to expose itself not as a doctrine of "equality", but rather as a doctrine of advantages for females and their allies. Moderators of forums continue to expose themselves as allies to this control of informat…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 08:48 PM
5

The media freaked out over a few Russians buying Facebook ads. They called it “election meddling”. This is election meddling. Exactly.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 01:35 AM
3

Toxic Femininity at its finest.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 07:26 PM
14

You fell in the playground and scrapped your knee. The correct answer was: Get on social media and start complaining how playground equipment was made by men for boys and doesn't take into account girls or women. This is oppressive in nature and can even lead to injuries like yours. Blame everyone else and start a campaign. Call your local politician and news station. Start holding protests and demand funding for committees and female "diversity" playground architects. Because #Equality. There, …
/r/MensRights10/05/19 12:43 AM
2

That's absurd. How many of the lead characters are strong, badass women? Heck, they even ruined Jon Snow's whole character arc by... Oh, wait. No spoilers. Sorry! Anyway, completely absurd.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 11:52 PM
4

No. From what I understand it needs to be verified and approved by several different people before being published. One of the tricks they'll use is putting in a quotation from someone, but making it seem like a statement of fact. For example this passage: In 2018, the Southern Poverty Law Center categorized some men's rights groups as being part of a hate ideology under the umbrella of patriarchyand male supremacy. The movement and sectors of the movement have been described as misogynistic, an…
/r/MensRights19/04/19 03:33 PM
7

I've read several Wikipedia Articles recently which are blatant misrepresentations, usually pushing a political narrative.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:53 PM
2

It's almost as though there is one standard for men, and a different standard for women.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:51 PM
6

This is against Twitter's Guidelines and Community Standards. She should be permanently banned. Oh, right. She won't be. They only enforce the standards when it's conservatives.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 02:57 AM
1

You poor guy... Good luck!
/r/MensRights10/04/19 07:41 PM
6

CH Sommers is a white supremacist And there it is. The inevitable charge of "white supremacy". The logic follows: She's anti-feminist. Therefore she must also be a white supremacist. Unbelievable. Who are these people? This is completely absurd.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 04:57 PM
3

Well, he's right.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 04:47 PM
2

Thank you. It's not your fault. You are not responsible for what other people do or think. Big Feminism is to blame. Thank you for sharing this message with the people around you. :)
/r/MensRights31/03/19 11:36 PM
4

Because of the "if it's true" part. The media is pushing a narrative, and they have lied to us before. Quite recently in fact.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 04:55 PM
4

That's what the CBC does. They are using the word "teenager" as reported speech. That is, according to the female observer who is telling the story. It could have very well been a consenting adult. Unfortunately, we'll never know.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 04:32 PM
21

I would like to know the other side of the story. The CBC is definitely politically motivated. They've been pushing that narrative for a long time now. We have now seen with definitive proof how the media has been... Let's say "less than honest" with us. Especially recently (Covington, Jussie Smollett). Especially when it comes to these types of stories. I'm particularly interested in the "dirty picture" part of the story. For the whole story, the female observer is using reported speech. "He sa…
/r/MensRights26/03/19 04:09 PM
12

This article was posted in our national subreddit rCanada. rCanada has been overrun with SJWs and Feminists, and naturally the overall reaction there is generally what you would expect: "All men bad. All women victims."
/r/MensRights26/03/19 03:59 PM
13

Go ahead and post in rFeminism to ask them to stop using "toxic masculinity". You'll be banned in 30 seconds.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 05:31 AM
3

I've heard hundreds of women say this before. I've never seen it happen.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 05:19 PM
1

I have two words for you: Asian Girls. Women like taller men. No doubt about it, and unfortunately nothing you can do about it. But Asians, in particular Japanese, are generally shorter than us. Plus, they are wonderful partners and companions. Plus, their society hasn't yet been ruined by the feminist scourge. Sign up for a language exchange.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 09:03 PM
3

MEN ARE NOT THE STANDARD!! So... What's the "patriarchy" then?
/r/MensRights16/03/19 11:02 PM
4

"We want all the advantages and to be treated just like men! ...But we don't want all the hard work that comes with it!"
/r/MensRights15/03/19 10:32 PM
3

I'm not exactly familiar with the rules either, but you should scribble out her avatar as well. We shouldn't be doxxing anyone here.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 10:20 PM
15

"Except my dad and boyfriend." Lol.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 10:19 PM
6

Where is the feminist outrage? Where are the armies of Career Twitterites slamming the perpetrator? Where are the commercials telling "women, you have to be better"? You mean, the snarky holier-than-thou activism only works one way? I thought feminism was all about "equality". Was I wrong about that?
/r/MensRights15/03/19 10:18 PM
1

We need more women in Amazon!
/r/MensRights27/02/19 05:14 AM
6

It's the classic masculinity being defined through a feminist lens. If we tried to define what "being a woman" meant, I'm pretty sure we would get well reprimanded. And rightfully so. Yet, here we are. All day long we hear from women what we are supposed to be, and what we're doing wrong. Big Feminism has made an attempt to define masculinity. Don't let them.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 05:05 PM
16

Easily Canada. In Canada, men are getting separated from their families, sent to jail without priors for one sexual assault complaint, and censored every time they try to speak, unless they are complete liberal shills. Every decision our corrupt government makes is filtered through a "gender lens". Our budget outlines dozens of funding provisions for women, zero for men. There is funding for women at every level be it academic, cultural or governmental. Men get nothing. Because nobody cares. Bil…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 09:22 PM
1

So like CNN?
/r/MensRights09/02/19 07:12 PM
1

Do you want to ban everyone you disagree with?
/r/MensRights09/02/19 02:18 PM
1

That's good. And thank you for sharing that. But fuck the Democrats. At least the ruling elite within your party. I will never vote Democrat ever again. That stunt they pulled will never be forgotten.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 02:17 PM
3

Where's the outrage? Where are the protests? Where are the pedantic shitheads lecturing all of us to "believe all women"? Don't forget Cory Booker. Don't forget Cory Booker has an allegation against him as well. Don't forget Cory Booker lectured the Senate Committee for over 20 minutes about "believe the women". Fuck them. I've been a Democrat my whole life and I can promise you this: I will never vote Democrat ever again. Not a fucking chance. That Brett Kavanaugh side circus was fucking pathet…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 02:16 PM
27

Absolutely true. The only people I've ever heard body shaming women have been other women.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 02:07 PM
3

It seems like there are dozens of Hollywood movies where, "your dad is too busy at work to go to your dance recital". Families living in multi million dollar mansions, and "all I want for Christmas is to see my dad... But he's always working." The strong, independent mother soothing and affirming the little one. But look at your house! Look at your lifestyle! Who the hell do you think pays for it all!? Of course he's busy! He's paying for you so you have a good life! And he's the asshole for it!…
/r/MensRights08/02/19 07:42 PM
1

Several people have given some excellent answers here already. One angle which I think is very underappreciated is the media. The media is firmly against men's rights. You can see this everywhere and on many different levels. One of my favourite examples is the CBC when they were doing a "report" about the movie The Red Pill. They brought on a feminist to talk about the movie, and she had never seen the movie. The interviewer asked her if she had ever seen the movie, and she flat out said no. Ca…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 05:06 PM
1

On a serious note, I'm really curious if now they could show a grain of empathy and understanding towards the reaction of the Gillette ad. Yeah, no. They won't.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 05:34 AM
23

The only people ever who have told me to "man up" have been women.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 01:57 AM
23

"Men need to open up and talk about their feelings more!!" "Okay, I feel like..." "STOP BEING SUCH A SNOWFLAKE!"
/r/MensRights29/01/19 05:55 PM
1

Lol. That's hilarious. You know you're doing good work when they ban you even before you comment. Keep me posted about your upcoming sub! :)
/r/MensRights29/01/19 04:34 PM
6

Interesting. Good catch. That was a weird conversation you guys had. I'm not really sure what his overall point was. Is he just trying to be contrarian? This isn't unlike the subreddit /r/antivax, which is a subreddit which is actually very, very pro vax. There's something meta there. But I don't know what it is yet. Reddit is gradually being broken one standard at a time.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 06:57 AM
11

This article is fantastic.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:32 PM
1

Excellent post. Thank you for taking the time to write this out. I would like to add these communities go out of their way to vilify so-called "men's communities" as well. I have a female friend who stubbornly refuses to watch The Red Pill. She outright refuses. She says, "anything that has taken that name is endorsing the subreddit with the same name, and that subreddit is a misogynistic hellhole which has been quarantined." There's a war going on on the internet.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 07:34 PM
3

YouTube should be sued. In fact, by their own parameters, they should be banned for spreading "fake news". This is pathetic. Fuck YouTube.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 04:24 AM
5

Unbelievable. Censorship is now a reality in our society.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 04:21 AM
1

mic drop
/r/MensRights17/01/19 04:19 AM
1

Oh, we know about this one. That man is a genius.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 04:18 AM
3

First, can I ask? Are you a man or a woman? Nope. Not upset at all, at your comment or the advertisement. Cool. I'm not really that upset either. Did you think I was upset? It does appear as though many men feel the same way I do. Still not sure how you are polling this. Over 900 upvotes and 2 golds. That's generally how one polls how other people feel about something. In fact, now I think you're starting to see my overall point. Never missed your point. Just find it hilarious. Lol. Nope. You mi…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 01:55 AM
4

Maybe you should stop being triggered by people writing their own commentary mm-kay?
/r/MensRights16/01/19 11:46 PM
3

That you feel the need to react to an advertisement in such a way. You feel upset that I "felt the need to react to an advertisement" that way? But not about the advertisement itself? Well that, and your claim to speak for most men. It does appear as though many men feel the same way I do. That's just not possible, Interesting. So you do understand that all men are different. That's interesting. So then your reaction should be disdain for an ad that just literally threw every man under the bus, …
/r/MensRights16/01/19 11:45 PM
5

What part do you disagree with?
/r/MensRights16/01/19 09:01 PM
4

Notice how no one flips their shit when the OP points out any of that stuff? Well, because they understood my point. Did you? Maybe you guys should try not to flip your shit when someone talks about toxic masculinity, eh? Or would that be too much like intellectual consistency? This was posted on /r/feminism and it was immediately removed and the poster was banned. Any other questions?
/r/MensRights16/01/19 08:43 PM
5

Well, you missed the point.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 08:31 PM
4

Did you read the last two paragraphs?
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:40 PM
4

Thank you. Yes, that was the point. Of course not all women are like that. Neither are all men. I keep hearing, "but why are men offended by this (the Gillette ad)?" I felt this was a nice illustration as to why. Thank you.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:39 PM
2

Nice! Lol. I would have done so myself but... I'm obviously already banned from there. They don't want to be challenged.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:35 PM
3

Absolutely. If you're in the app just hold your thumb on the submission and a menu should come up giving you the option to copy/paste. Use it freely! It's all yours. Thank you! :)
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:24 AM
1

Bhahahahaha! Oh man... Please don't tell anyone. Maybe nobody else will notice... Ugh...
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:22 AM
1

That was superb. Thank you.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:21 AM
2

I agree. I didn't fully write this as well as I would have liked.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:38 PM
17

I never used to be this extreme. The Internet made me this way.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 07:32 PM
29

Well I've obviously already been banned over there. Lol.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:46 PM
4

/r/Metacanada for the win baby. Book it.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 06:59 AM
2

We are! Happy to be your neighbours. :) Our national subreddit is in the midst of a censorship initiative started by nefarious individuals. All conservative opinion, especially if it is against immigration or feminism, even if it's well thought out reasonable opinion, is being censored by the mods. These commentators are then targeted and banned. Whatever is happening in feminism. At least it's limited to just their discussion about feminism. What is happening in /r/Canada truly is wrong. Censor…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:07 PM
3

I guess you've never posted on /r/Canada then.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:29 AM
8

she quit the organization at the end of 2016 after she said she a male member of Our Revolution berated her for suggesting an organizing plan. The horror. How dare someone disagree with her. How dare they. Especially a male. The absurdity knows no bounds.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 08:24 AM
12

I like it. I agree. Unfortunately, most of us have been banned from venue where we were making ground. /r/Canada has come under control of a regime of left-wing censorship. They have targeted everyone who respectfully argues against the narrative, and they abused their position as mods to censor these users. If we aren't allowed into the spaces where lurkers lurk, how are we supposed to be able to turn public opinion? Censorship is the issue we are dealing with right now. There are many in the p…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 03:22 PM
2

This is alarmingly Orwellian.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 03:18 PM
12

Never apologize or try to justify it. The minute you start spinning, they'll be all over you like sharks in bloody water. Say, "feminism is the scourge of society." And look them right in the eye and dare them to tell you otherwise. That's when they usually back down. Or, start laughing because they think you're joking. That's the only strategy which has ever worked for me. I get torn to shreds if I try to half-step it.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 06:52 AM
0

Why? I say we keep pointing out blatant censorship when it happens. The only way to combat tyranny is to shine light on it.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 05:03 AM
1

Jesus. Is this for real?
/r/MensRights11/12/18 02:39 AM
5

Compared to literally anyone.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 05:59 PM
5

His son is a complete disaster though.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 04:49 PM
1

I've always said: I would much rather have an angry man coming at me with his fists than an angry woman coming after me with her phone. Women are vicious on social media.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 03:23 AM
1

On top of that, no one is allowed to comment or disagree with this document. Everyone who disagrees with this is banned from the /r/Canada by moderators who are fully in the bag. Anyone who speaks badly about our "fearless leader" Justin Trudeau gets targeted and banned. There is censorship and election tampering in our country's subreddit.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 09:38 PM
1

The People's Party of Canada led by Maxime Bernier. Let's make history.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 09:36 PM
1

Yes. There is. It's called The People's Party of Canada led by Maxime Bernier. This is our choice in 2019.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 09:35 PM
1

Correct. He also significantly increased immigration. In fact, Harper has been the most pro immigration Prime Minister in our history not named Justin Trudeau. Highest immigration levels in over 70 years since the War and it isn't even close. Harper also didn't even once touch the abortion debate. Not once. Despite this, he was called "anti-immigration" (racist) and "anti-abortion" (which in Canada is basically a death sentence politically). Plenty of misinformation about Harper out there. I bel…
/r/MensRights05/12/18 10:54 PM
5

Shake things up maybe I would agree with. But Harper was without a doubt a much better Prime Minister than Justin Trudeau. It isn't even close.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 08:59 PM
4

Was much better then the alternative. I couldn't disagree more. Harper was a much better option.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 08:16 PM
16

It gets even worse. Canada is in the midst of a leftist, neo-Marxist social justice devolution. Censorship has become a reality. And our media is complicit in this silencing of freedom of expression. The Great Helmsman Trudeau has just offered a 595 million dollar bribe to the media claiming to offer this money to "qualifying" news agencies. In return, the media has been eating it up and praising Trudeau. And why wouldn't they? If Trudeau gets elected, they can all take a bonus and go home. It's…
/r/MensRights04/12/18 07:36 PM
12

Not fucking me. I can assure you of that.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 06:38 PM
5

In other words, women could do what men do, but we choose not to because we are relatively better at other things — but we also get paid less to do them. Maybe Emily is unaware of a little something called "supply and demand". I've had this conversation many times with feminists. Why do coal miners make more than teachers!! That's unfair!! They might even make an argument that a teacher is more important to society than a coal miner. And they might even be right about that too. However, supply a…
/r/MensRights04/12/18 05:57 PM
24

Something something #Equality!!
/r/MensRights04/12/18 05:30 PM
2

Wear it like a badge. Thank you for sticking your neck out there. You represent the difference we want to see in the world.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 05:28 PM
1

You hit the nail on the head in your description of MensLib. I used to consider myself on the "left" as well. But it has gotten increasingly difficult to have an actual, rational conversation with these people. Everything is "racist", "misogynist", or "bigoted". Brett Kavanaugh. Don't even get me started. The left has lost its way. And I think a great number of people are realizing this. Hence the "rise of the right". I personally feel that until you realize the disingenuous and dangerous author…
/r/MensRights03/12/18 04:45 PM
1

Never apologize to these people. They will take it as an admission of guilt.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 04:25 PM
1

OH MY GOODNESS, THAT'S LITERALLY RAPE! How dare someone comments on her diamond ring which she is wearing on her middle finger. How dare they!
/r/MensRights03/12/18 04:23 PM
2

Yup. Now they are eating their own. This is exactly as we had predicted.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 04:20 PM
1

I used to think feminism was about equal rights but it actually isn't. You can say that again. Many people around the world are waking up to this reality. Thank you for posting.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 04:15 PM
3

Very good. I agree.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 03:36 AM
18

“The reality is, misandry does not have the history or impact of misogyny,” says Jessica Eaton of Victim Focus, an organisation that works with survivors of sexual violence. “There is no global oppressive hatred of men that subjugates them into a lesser role in society. There is no systematic oppression of men all over the world that leads to them being abused, bought, sold, mutilated, killed or aborted purely based on them being men and boys.” Abused How about the Catholic Church? Bought, sold …
/r/MensRights02/12/18 10:06 PM
21

The reply pretty much sums it all up. Lol.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 10:28 PM
1

Okay, well if we're getting nit picky, you're probably right. We don't exactly live in a capitalist system. It's probably closer to crony capitalism to be exact. We certainly don't live in a communist system. And the "anti-capitalist turds" whom we were talking about in the original post are the direct beneficiaries of a system that allowed companies like Starbucks, Apple, and whatever else they use to do their activism, to exist. All I'm saying is the "anti-capitalist turds" are flourishing und…
/r/MensRights30/11/18 10:07 PM
1

Right. I think we've gotten to this point because of a market-based economy and freedom of speech. This new trend towards authoritarian regulated speech is relatively new, and will be a disaster for society if it continues. In other words, the link you posted was an indication of us moving away from freedom of expression, and I find that concerning. I'm highlighting we need to stop this trend.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 09:11 PM
1

On the contrary it is in spite of capitalism, because capitalism depends on censorship. Capitalism depends on censorship? I don't think so man... Doesn't like authoritarian socialism rely on censorship? As in, what we are seeing today all across the internet, the media and Reddit?
/r/MensRights30/11/18 07:37 PM
2

Precisely. The only people I ever hear deriding males' emotions are women or make feminists. "Men never show their emotions!" "Here's my emotion." "You're not allowed to have that emotion! You're a loser or a crybaby! #Equality!!"
/r/MensRights30/11/18 07:07 PM
2

The way it's used which bothers me is in the "men don't feel comfortable sharing their emotions". A. This is not true. B. This is usually said by a woman. How can a woman define what a man's emotions look like? Men express their emotions differently. What especially irks me about "toxic masculinity", is not only is a rejection of men's emotions, it's a refusal to accept they even exist. Then they put the blame for that misunderstanding on the man! It's unbelievable. How many times have I heard, …
/r/MensRights30/11/18 05:16 PM
3

I don't trust that sub. Any entity that uses the term "toxic masculinity" in any serious manner immediately gets a big fat red marker stroking out its name. I refuse to engage in misandry and morally bankrupt concepts created for the benefit of a closed group of academic fear peddlers who ended up eating the own shit they forcibly pushed on us in the first place. /r/MensLib must first absolutely reject the sexist concept of "toxic masculinity". Then we can talk.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:46 PM
1

Yes, I have been banned there. In the past three months or so, users have been getting banned like crazy there. I'm making a list of people banned from /r/Canada. There are quite a few, including a few MRAs.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:10 AM
3

I think most teachers are women, yes. I was being tongue-and-cheek with my "Matriarchy" comment. I've just heard "because of the patriarchy" so many times I couldn't resist.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 01:04 AM
1

Well I think this guy described it very well. As a man, it's hard to break into a workplace which is dominated by the Matriarchy. ;)
/r/MensRights30/11/18 12:56 AM
1

I understand that. But I still don't see how that relates to, "not because of capitalism."
/r/MensRights30/11/18 12:16 AM
1

Interesting. Do you know if they have taken over /r/Canada?
/r/MensRights30/11/18 12:13 AM
1

I dont mind feminists being themselves (censorious assholes that is) but they shouldn't do it on Ask or Debate boards (which they do), and they shouldn't try to bully and blackmail mods on boards the don't control to ban critics (which they do) or lie and accuse you of rape, pedophilia, or harassment to get you thrown off a board (which they do). I really like this. Thank you for sharing.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 11:35 PM
1

Interesting. Well isn't that fascinating. So do you mean feminists have taken over /r/Anarchists?
/r/MensRights29/11/18 11:34 PM
1

What? How does that make any sense?
/r/MensRights29/11/18 11:33 PM
2

Lol. Oh, yes. Oh, yes my friend. It was a gradual slowburn build up to be sure, but it has in fact come to that. I mostly blame /r/Canada.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 11:03 PM
3

Lots of anti-capitalist turds showing up to lecture us about how bad we all are. I love these people. Sitting in Starbucks behind their MacBook Air bought on credit lecturing small business owners about "living wage". Ah, yes. It's great we can all live in a society where no matter how asinine our opinions are, we are allowed to express them and pursue our dreams freely. Oh right. That is because of capitalism.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 10:58 PM
1

An anarchist called you an MRA for not accepting feminist propaganda? Wow... That's... Interesting. Especially interesting that anarchists have rules in their sub. Anyway, thank you for your participation. Take care! :)
/r/MensRights29/11/18 10:40 PM
2

Excellent. Thank you! Have you been banned from /r/Canada yet? There is a culture of censorship happening in that subreddit right now. I'm wondering if you made that comment in /r/Canada if you would get banned (I'm guessing likely yes).
/r/MensRights29/11/18 10:36 PM
3

I declared myself a feminist. That was your first mistake. Never do that. Don't give them an inch or they will eat you alive. Everything else you've said is bang on. Happening all around the world. I hope things get better for you.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 09:50 PM
3

So I understand what you are saying. But I think it has to start with them. If we're all banned, we can't really have a conversation. Why don't you ask that sub why we're all banned? Have you asked them the same thing you asked us? "Why don't we all try to get along?". Ask them. Let's see what they say.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 02:18 PM
9

Well good for you. :) Let us know how long that lasts.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 04:29 AM
15

This is a really good idea. Maybe we can just go over to /r/Feminism and have the conversation over th... Oh, right. We've all been banned.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 04:17 AM
3

If only society could create a hobby which girls could enjoy and gain life experience from.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:23 PM
1

Don't tell her. Keep your job. This is the environment they wanted. So this is the environment they will get.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:16 PM
2

Drop out of school. Academia has been hijacked, and what they are teaching you is poison.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:13 PM
5

In Canada, we have something called the Employment Equity Act. requires federal jurisdiction employers to engage in proactive employment practices to increase the representation of four designated groups: women, people with disabilities, Aboriginal peoples, and visible minorities. When you actually examine it, that's everyone. Except for white men. That's both racist and sexist. And it is sanctified by our government.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 08:41 PM
-1

You still can't it out into your head that the lefties are the bad guys. You just can't bring yourself to do it, eh?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 05:55 PM
1

So brave.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 05:40 PM
2

But but... Toxic Masculinity? Aren't men supposed to show their emotions?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 05:36 PM
31

Apple believes that gender expression is a fundamental right. We welcome all women to apply to this program. Apple believes that gender expression is a fundamental right. We give preferential to one of those genders.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 05:34 PM
2

I agree.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 05:10 AM
4

This is 100% correct. Freedom of expression. Let them speak. Besides, I like trolls. They're like our butlers. It means they like us.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:21 AM
0

The left is very fond of mental gymnastics.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 03:06 AM
2

You haven't. If you did it would get laughed at and dismissed. Lol. You're probably right. Get over it, you sound like a lunatic. Not really. I'm keeping people informed about censorship. Do you support censorship? Why won't you tell me if you play chess?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 01:32 AM
2

Were Russian Trolls on Facebook a good example of election tampering? Maybe I have, maybe I haven't. Maybe I'm still considering the next course of action. Maybe I'm currently taking the course of action to inform people about this as sunlight is the best way to deal with tyranny. Do you play chess?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 01:11 AM
2

First of all, I want to get to the bottom of this username. Do you play chess? Two mods in Canada have informed us they remove all posts about Jordan Peterson. This is certainly censorship. VelvetJustice was confirmed to be under the influence of extortion as a /r/Canada mod over six months ago. Since then, the mod team has changed its mod team, and it's moderation standards. They have confirmed "an average of 8 permanent bans are handed out daily". A quick overview of those being banned are cle…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 12:49 AM
2

Why have you not reported this to the proper authorities? Who says I haven't already? Besides, the best way to counteract tyranny, is to shine light on it. Which is what I am doing. Can you provide evidence for your claims about the political leanings of everyone who has been banned from /r/Canada? Do you read this thread at all? Everyday there is another Metacanadian getting banned from /r/Canada. Each one is more egregious than the last. Count how many Conservatives, and especially Bernier Sup…
/r/MensRights26/11/18 11:46 PM
2

Well, I have news for you. It is most certainly currently occurring in /r/Canada. Why are most Conservatives and Bernier Supporters getting banned from /r/Canada? For the most egregious applications of the rules no less. Anyone who criticizes Trudeau gets banned from that sub. Meanwhile, someone on the left can say whatever they want and not get banned. How do you explain that if it isn't censorship and election tampering?
/r/MensRights26/11/18 11:30 PM
13

She explained to her majority female audience Here's the problem. In academia, masculinity is being defined by females, through a feminist perspective. Nothing could be as morally bankrupt. What the heck does a woman know about being a man? I dare any women to explain to me what being a man is like. It's an absurd premise. Feminism would positively recoil if men started defining what it "meant to be a woman". Yet it turns right around and attempts to define us. Under their terms no less. "Anger"…
/r/MensRights26/11/18 11:25 PM
9

Did she get fired?
/r/MensRights26/11/18 11:06 PM
60

We need more women in boilermaking!! Lol
/r/MensRights26/11/18 10:10 PM
1

Thank you. I appreciate your concern. How do you feel about censorship and election tampering?
/r/MensRights26/11/18 10:10 PM
492

“We Saved You a Seat,” You mean, you took a seat away from somebody else. Why aren't there any programs like this to increase the number of males in teaching, medicine and psychology?
/r/MensRights26/11/18 05:49 PM
3

I hear that a lot. So I always ask for evidence. Even something paraphrased. The answer is usually, "I can't remember right now." Then they say something like, "well, you would have to be a misogynist to post in men's rights!" Which is false of course. You might be in here posting about men's health. Or you could be in here arguing with men's rights activists. Posting in here is not an automatic condemnation. I'll tell you what's really happening: Girls are reading this on Huffington Post, Pinte…
/r/MensRights26/11/18 05:46 PM
6

It has become a Reddit wide issue. Censorship is now a reality in our world. This sub isn't nearly as bad as /r/Canada. /r/Canada is in the process of banning all conservative and Maxime Bernier Supporters from their sub. They are doing this as a lead up to our 2019 election. This is election tampering.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 05:39 PM
2

This is what promoted Paul Elam (leader of A Voice For Men And Boys) to state: “Should I be called to sit on a jury for a rape trial, I vow publicly to vote not guilty, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that the charges are true,” The idea being that if juries aren't to be trusted (Bindel), then why have a jury at all? (Elam). This quotation was of course taken out of context, and has been used to vilify men's rights ever since. Naturally, if we attempt to use Bindel's dangerous rhetoric…
/r/MensRights22/11/18 09:57 PM
1

How dare someone criticize something on the Internet. How dare they.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 01:42 AM
2

White male privilege.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 01:27 AM
1

Women are as strong and can do anything just like a man. Get over it. Even if that means winning the "Man of the Year" Award. Get over it. Lol.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 11:33 PM
13

But I thought we were all equal?
/r/MensRights16/11/18 11:27 PM
14

Invite all female speakers and then start undertake hormonal transition therapy to become a woman. You will be a star in no time.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 11:25 PM
3

... And then you will eventually get banned from the censorship regime that calls itself /r/Canada.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 04:16 PM
11

Michael Kimmel. One wonders if he is wearing this label on his own penis. Does he practice what he preaches? Clearly he is not as he now also has an allegation against him. Funny how the main stream media hadn't picked this one up. Funny how there seems to be little outrage. It's almost as if there is one standard for one group of people, and a different standard for a different group of people.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 04:14 PM
2

Is this fake news? Did GQ really do that? Has anyone checked if the editors are okay? I mean... Maybe they've ODed or something. They're obviously on crack.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 03:46 PM
11

No and no. What's with Liberals and their, "Is English your second language??" Insult? Do you not have anything better than that? Seriously? Like, what if English was my second language?
/r/MensRights16/11/18 01:07 AM
3

Are you suggesting that the Democrats with their universal health care, and Medicaid and affirmative action are actually just being coy with us, and are actually on the right funding Nazis?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 10:18 PM
44

We need more women in boilermaking!
/r/MensRights15/11/18 06:17 PM
2

Cool. So according to you, Obama is a Nazi. Got it. What were we talking about again?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 06:07 PM
2

No. No, I don't think that was a good thing. I don't think that was an intentional thing either.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:44 PM
3

So... Like, are you one of those but jobs who believes Obama is too far right? Are you a Bernie Sanders supporter? Or is he too far right too? Who's "left enough" for you? Like Mao Zedong?
/r/MensRights14/11/18 10:47 PM
9

Ridiculous. I sometimes wish I was born female. That way, the world could pander to me, bend itself to relate to me, and I would have an easier time getting work.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 05:23 PM
1

Well, I'm not just "some youth". However, you are free to have your own opinion. Just don't say you weren't warned. Good luck.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 02:35 PM
3

Ah, cool. Thank you for confirming you had no point to make, nor nothing of interest to offer to this conversation.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 02:32 PM
3

Just think of verified journalists trying to explain that the future isn’t equal, it’s female. They will call it "misogyny". Or "unconscious sexism".
/r/MensRights14/11/18 05:16 AM
15

Why didn't anyone try to warn us?
/r/MensRights14/11/18 05:15 AM
1

You wrote: Obama trained, financed and armed actual Nazis to take over a country of 44 million people. Then you linked to a page where some government money may have ended up in the hands of two individuals who possibly participated in an event which may have indicated they were connected with an organization which may have a minor relation with a nationalist group. It's a big jump. Are you one of those guys who thinks Bernie Sanders is too far right?
/r/MensRights14/11/18 12:10 AM
1

I didn't say I know more. Your articles didn't say what you said btw. And, no. The Democrats are not "on the right". That's foolishness.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 10:59 PM
3

You must be sexist to think that!! All people are exactly the same!! REEEEEEE!! (Did I get that right?)
/r/MensRights13/11/18 10:53 PM
3

Who would have seen that coming?
/r/MensRights13/11/18 10:51 PM
13

It was only a matter of time. We live in a culture of censorship and deplatforming. Totalitarianism is on the rise. We aren't allowed to disagree or have different opinions anymore.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 10:48 PM
1

Obama trained, financed and armed actual Nazis to take over a country of 44 million people. What in the actual fuck are you talking about? I think you're confused about what left and right are You're just generally ignorant of US politics. Ummm... You just accused Obama of training and arming actual Nazis. So... No.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 10:42 PM
1

Would you care to actually have a conversation about this? You realize we're actually on the same side, right? You don't believe the Democrats are on the "left". Cool. That's like a longer conversation, and I don't really care to argue that point. It's irrelevant to my original point, which is essentially that the Democrats and Liberals are disingenuous shitheads and need to be stopped. I still see on this sub people supporting these vile institutions. I'm really not sure how you can be for men'…
/r/MensRights13/11/18 10:07 PM
2

Feminism is a right wing movement. Why would being anti-feminist be a problem for the Left? What? No it isn't. Can you point to any right wing politician that has come out and attacked feminism? Certainly not enough of them. Right now, it's too politically dangerous to attack feminism. Witness anyone in the past five years who has tried: Jordan Peterson, Faith Goldy, Gavin McInnes, Paul Elam, Christina Hoff Sommers, even Warren Farrell hasn't been saved from the voracious maw of angry feminism a…
/r/MensRights13/11/18 09:59 PM
1

Lol. Okay. Don't say you weren't warned.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 09:53 PM
1

Well, I can't comment on that. Lol. I'm sure you know better than me about your country's politics! :)
/r/MensRights13/11/18 09:52 PM
1

Arguing that MR should be right-wing because feminism is left-wing just seems like an unreasonable position. That isn't my point. My point is that the left is lying to you, manipulating you, and doesn't give a damn whether you are equal, or whether you die in the muck in the street. These are dishonest, vengeful people. We've seen their voracity during the Kavanaugh hearing, and we continue to uncover stories of their willingness to deceive in order to gain power with the sole intention of subje…
/r/MensRights13/11/18 03:20 PM
1

You are fucking weird man.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 03:14 PM
1

You are entitled to your belief, as I am entitled to mine. That's true. We live in a democracy. Just because you find it wise to throw your support behind people you barely agree with, does not mean that many others do as well. I would rather support people with whom I slightly disagree than people who are lying in order to deceive me. There is a festering, rotting sore eating away at the Democrat Party. One must never support tyranny. I feel it is in good form to keep partisan politics outside …
/r/MensRights13/11/18 04:04 AM
1

What? Man, what the fuck? What even was your fucking point?
/r/MensRights13/11/18 03:22 AM
0

Also, wrong.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:24 PM
1

Men the belief that they should be the breadwinner This is what women believe as well. Look at the couples around you. Women tend to be attracted to successful, wealthy males. Males are attracted to physical beauty. the belief that can't show emotion Again, this is what women believe. Go on social media and show how you feel. You will almost immediately be ridiculous. Witness the Kavanaugh debacle. He showed emotion. What was the response from the left? "He showed too much emotion!" There's a di…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 07:36 PM
0

Ah, wrong.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 07:30 PM
1

I still want legalization, It will happen. higher taxes on the wealthy, Why? single payer healthcare, Why? Quality deteriorates. less military spending Liberals in Canada spent more than Conservatives on military spending. No one seems to worry about that. Why am I going to abandon the party that I support 80% of the time for the party I support 20% of the time? Because that party will see the end of you and civilization.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 07:29 PM
13

You know what really bothers me about articles like this? They haven't offered a single shred of evidence or proof of anything even remotely resembling "misogyny".
/r/MensRights12/11/18 07:27 PM
4

This article is complete nonsense. The only thing of value to take away here is the media seems completely, wilfully blind to the possibility of misandry.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 06:01 PM
1

The entire farce that was the Brett Kavanaugh hearing.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 05:51 PM
1

They do? What do you mean by "traditional standards for men"?
/r/MensRights12/11/18 05:50 PM
0

“I am Jane Doe from Oceanside CA — Kavanaugh raped me,” Ms. Munro-Leighton wrote in an Oct. 3 email claiming to have been a victim of the judge.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 05:05 PM
2

That's the truest thing I've read all day. Well said. Thank you.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 04:50 PM
0

Someone sent an anonymous letter in CA. Munro copied that letter and emailed it and claimed it as hers. Now she's saying that the letter wasn't her. Right. That's a false accusation. By definition. End of story. Well, no. Not "end of story". That doesn't mean the letter is a false allegation. Yes, it does. That's actually precisely what that means. The person who claims to have written the letter is now saying it was completely fabricated. That's literally the definition of a false accusation. M…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 04:48 PM
0

Lol. Hahahahahahaha!! I love it. That's hilarious. So, you'd believe that someone claiming they made up a false allegation is in itself a false allegation? Hahahaha! Yeah, that must be it. She must be making a false allegation about having had made a false allegation. Yeah, that totally makes sense. Do you hear yourself? Do you understand the level of mental gymnastics you are performing here? That doesn't disprove the letter Ah, yes. Yes, it does. That's exactly what it means. Give me a freakin…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 04:09 PM
0

Right. So that's a false allegation.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 03:03 PM
-3

In the USA for example it'd be hard to vote for a party that supports the war on drugs, The war on drugs hasn't been a thing since the 90s. In any event, the real drug problem in the United States is the opioid crisis. Big Pharma. Funded and perpetuated by the Democratic Party. bloated military spending, In Canada, the Liberals actually increased the military budget. Barely any news reports about that. Nobody cares. I even told my liberal friend about it and he said, "it's good we're supporting …
/r/MensRights12/11/18 03:03 PM
0

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/3/another-kavanaugh-accuser-admits-fabricating-rape-/ Would you care to change your position?
/r/MensRights12/11/18 02:55 PM
2

Lol. I believe you. Although... I'm Canadian. I'm not too sure we're that 'far behind'.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 02:53 PM
-1

I think that "Left ideas" such as crazy feminist man-bashing, gender politics, and discrimination against men = Bad Unfortunately, this is all they have left. But "Left ideas" about Universal Healthcare for all citizens = Good. We can agree to disagree on that. The idea of it is right. The concept that 'everyone has a right to universal healthcare' is a good idea. But it is not necessarily a good idea in practice. That's a longer discussion of course. then all of a sudden we import 100s of thous…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 02:52 PM
0

I'm not necessarily 'left wing' but I'm pro-choice and pro-gay marriage etc. I am too. Maybe things are different in Canada, but I don't really feel like those are major issues these days. I think the left likes to beat the political drum and bring up the specter the "evil right taking away these rights and freedoms". But frankly, I don't see that happening. Certainly not in Canada. We just had a Conservative government in majority power for the past decade and they never touched either of those…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 02:47 PM
1

But what's the "poison" for the Conservative Party? If you agree with your friends about social issues, isn't that a good thing? Isn't that called consensus?
/r/MensRights12/11/18 12:32 PM
-2

When it comes to men's rights, neither of them are very sympathetic. Many conservatives I read blame the fatherless problem all on immature men who refuse to grow up and take responsibility. Who does that? I've never read anything like that. You'd think more progressives would care, since these problems have an especially ugly impact on minority men, but no. Well that's definitely true. And that's part of my point.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 12:31 PM
0

It sure as fuck ain't the Democrats! Really? Are you sure about that?
/r/MensRights12/11/18 12:30 PM
2

Interesting. Do you feel like the current Republican party is against racial minorities? Have you heard what Malcom X says about Liberals? Have you read any of Thomas Sowell?
/r/MensRights12/11/18 12:27 PM
2

Democrats / Liberals must be prevented from gaining any further ground. It is in your best interest to vote Republican / Conservative.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 12:22 PM
1

Explain to me how anything else other than that happened.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 12:20 PM
0

It is unconscionable these accusers can now admit they were making false accusations, and no one gives a shit. It undermines the entire fucking process. It clearly demonstrates how the entire Kavanaugh episode was a farce from day one, and a desperate, pathetic, backhanded attempt by Democrats to prevent Kavanaugh from being confirmed. It is nothing short of absolutely appalling.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 05:31 AM
13

Cue the feminist backlash.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 05:24 AM
1

Who's that Asian girl on the right? No way she is 21 years old. Was she in the club??
/r/MensRights10/11/18 03:18 AM
6

Male privilege.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 03:17 AM
2

You are my hero buddy. I have nothing but respect. CBC News is agenda pushing propaganda. If you point this out on either /r/Canada or /r/CanadaPolitics, you're likely to get banned.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 02:52 AM
1

This isn't good. This is similar to the media's handling of the Toronto van attack. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/toronto-van-attack-driver-profile-alek-minassian-1.4632435 There are several problematic issues I see here: A. This information hasn't been verified. CNN has seen the videos The New York Times reported on, but has not independently verified that the man in the videos is the gunman identified by police. The videos were first reported by BuzzFeed News. Here's your first clue. …
/r/MensRights06/11/18 04:28 PM
1

I don't think anyone ever took her accusation seriously. Well. Except for Democrats and the main stream media. There are always going to be crazy people saying dumb things. It's unfortunate but there's nothing we can do about it. Aw, shucks. I guess there's "nothing we can do"! I guess we might as well so nothing! I guess let's just forget about how we stopped everything in society for about a month sorting this out. And forget about the horrible abuse this man suffered. I guess there's just "no…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 02:01 PM
5

This is exactly what happens when the minimum wage is raised suddenly and arbitrarily. There is less of a demand for labour, which means a surplus of people looking for jobs. This is an exact economic consequence of liberal policies. The only thing that should be a "surprise" here, is that people are surprised. We've been warning about exactly this consequence for years.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 10:18 AM
1

I was banned from /r/feminism within 10 minutes. They aren't very open to discussion.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 03:06 PM
1

Thank you for posting this. It is nothing short of absolutely appalling. If you didn't already know the main stream media has an agenda. Well, now you do.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 02:45 PM
4

A. I mostly agree with you. B. Statutory rape is a criminal definition by law. C. I think the really real point here is if an adult male had slept with a female of that age, they would most certainly be called a "rapist". I think C is really the main motivating factor on this sub here.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:27 PM
4

What question did you ask btw?
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:25 PM
7

Also fuck you. Lol. Well, at least they cut straight to the chase. I was banned from that sub within 10 seconds of posting there. Lol.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:24 PM
4

But can someone who hasn't experienced discrimination first-hand effectively lead conversations on inclusion? Straight white able-bodied men are experiencing first-hand discrimination in the workplace right now.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 05:49 PM
3

Gosh, I even disagree with him for being way too leftist there. Lol.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 03:04 PM
1

First, I think you need to more clearly define "power". A president may have a lot of power. A journalist may have a lot of power, but in a different way. This is the difference between overt power (power you can easily see), and covert power (power that lies underneath. Consider Karl Marx. Did he have power? On one hand, you might say no judging by his personal life situation. On the other hand, you might say yes considering the enormous influence his writings had. Consider a teacher. Does a te…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:50 PM
1

Excellent work. Please keep us updated.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 03:48 AM
2

This topic was locked by the mods at /r/Canada. https://np.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/9rh5uk/court_says_pedophilia_does_not_apply_because/e8i6xbw There is a censorship regime in /r/Canada. That's why you aren't seeing discussion about this posted.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 01:17 AM
2

The comments for this story were locked on /r/Canada. This is due to the censorship regime which has taken over our country's subreddit. https://np.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/9rh5uk/court_says_pedophilia_does_not_apply_because/e8i6xbw
/r/MensRights29/10/18 01:15 AM
1

Look at the comment right below yours.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 12:29 AM
2

Of course they did. There is a regime of censorship happening in /r/Canada right now. They have been locking threads, removing comments and banning people like it's going out of style.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 03:24 PM
2

Why not? Do you see something inaccurate about the information presented? If NBC deliberately mislead the public by withholding critical information, who's going to report on that? Are we not here to hold our media accountable? Well, here you go.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 11:22 AM
2

Thank you!
/r/MensRights27/10/18 02:20 AM
10

Well... We're not supposed to brigade... So I have a question about this for the mods. I know I'm not supposed to link to other threads, but this is the subject of our conversation. This is what we are talking about. Anyway, here's the thread. If we're not supposed to do that please let me know and I'll take it down. https://np.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/9rh5uk/court_says_pedophilia_does_not_apply_because/e8i6xbw
/r/MensRights27/10/18 02:12 AM
34

There is censorship happening on the Internet. You should have seen the shitshow this created on /r/Canada.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 01:32 AM
2

Man, that was a great article. I had a nice chuckle there. Wyshnysky at the top of his game.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 01:26 AM
2

How dare you suggest that not all masculinity is toxic. How dare you. These people are insane. Lol.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 11:36 PM
3

Good man. You did very well there. That is the only correct, natural and reasonable way to answer. The Democrats have lost their way.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 09:22 PM
2

This is currently what is happening in universities.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 09:21 PM
3

I agree. Either that, or force them to change the name of the subreddit. It does not represent the ideas of all Canadians. That is absolutely clear. This is me getting banned
/r/MensRights26/10/18 09:13 PM
1

Who's inviting who to brigade? I'm not sure I understand. The rate that /r/Canada is going, it should get brigaded. The mods have completely lost control over there. People are getting permanently banned these days for the most egregious examples. OP just got banned for suggesting people write to the Supreme Court to complain, and he provided the address. This was all public domain. That's not a banable offence. That's censorship. It needs to be talked about. Some sort of leftist, feminist, libe…
/r/MensRights26/10/18 09:09 PM
1

Why can't we talk about censorship in our country? Our accounts are being targeted partly because of our MRA status. This is a problem. This affects us all. We need to shine a light on censorship based on political beliefs. Not shy away from it.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 09:02 PM
2

No. This user did the right thing. The moderators at /r/Canada are unreasonable people who are interested in a political agenda. They do not respect rules. They do not respect open debate. They are there is silence and censor everyone who doesn't agree with their viewpoint. There is a censorship regime in /r/Canada right now, and people need to hear about it. Our country's subreddit has been taken over.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 07:12 PM
2

Welcome to the club! There is heavy censorship happening right now in /r/Canada. The moderators have confirmed they are permanently banning 8 users per day. Mostly Conservatives and/or anyone who has ever posted in /r/MensRights. Our country is currently facing censorship. You are welcome to come to /r/Metacanada and post this there. We've been talking about the censorship regime in Canada for quite some time now.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 07:10 PM
4

Well, we've tried. There is currently a regime of censorship occurring in our country's subreddit. They are banning people at a rate of 8 per day. Mostly conservatives and people who question this type of PC culture. Or whatever you would call it. Many Canadians are trying to tell everyone and debate these kinds of things. But we've been silenced.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:52 PM
4

... And so is Canada.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:50 PM
1

Yeah, I mean if Britain is feminazi police now, imagine what Canada is like!
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:50 PM
1

Where's Feminism on this one?
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:45 PM
15

Heavy moderation. I think you mean censorship. They've been kicking out anyone recently. This is happening in our country and we aren't allowed to comment on it because a bunch of immature assholes have hijacked the moderation team of /r/Canada and have banned anyone with half a brain.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:43 PM
1

Women = Good. Man = Bad. Got it.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:39 PM
1

#Equality
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:38 PM
52

Wait, what? That's the entire context of that quote? They are essentially using the slogan calling for the genocide of men, and they are putting onto t-shirts of little girls to wear proudly. What? Really?? What the fuck is going on!?
/r/MensRights26/10/18 12:10 PM
5

This is the Senator who lectured the Senate Judiciary Committee for over 20 minutes vehemently claiming we must, "believe the victim" and a vote to confirm would be an affirmation of sexual behaviour. Completely hypocritical. What will be really interesting, is how the main stream media and the MeToo Movement handle this.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 03:30 PM
1

Can you imagine a group of men getting together and burning effigies of people they hated. Wait, hasn't that already happened sometime in the past?
/r/MensRights16/10/18 10:31 PM
1

Rofl!! Bhahahahaha!! That's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 10:25 PM
14

Well, yeah. We told them this would happen if they closed ranks and selectively supported only their political allies. For example, defending Justin Trudeau against his groping allegations. I believe that in Canada, that was a major turning point for a lot of people. The whole Asia Argento debacle is another hammer blow to the integrity of the movement. It has now been shown to the public that the movement's intentions are no longer honest. If they were, they would persecute Justin Trudeau with …
/r/MensRights16/10/18 10:24 PM
15

Recall that when editor of the New York Book Review Ian Buruma published an essay written by Jian Ghomeshi, he was fired.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 02:51 AM
43

Strategy No. 1: Make your boys feel as comfortable as possible experiencing and discussing emotions. I really get annoyed when I see this pedantic falsehood being pedaled around the Internet like it's gospel. Have you ever noticed what happens to males when they do show their emotions? Witness Brett Kavanaugh. He showed emotion. And what happened? He was ridiculed, marginalized, lampooned, believed to be "lying", and perhaps most telling, was told he "wasn't fit for the job". When men show their…
/r/MensRights14/10/18 12:37 PM
3

I like your idea, but I just want to say I outright and categorically reject the misandric concept of "toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights14/10/18 12:18 PM
2

What is going on in the world? The Tweets we are seeing these days seem to be getting more and more extreme. Even a few months ago, this would have been easily dismissed as satire. But now... Now I'm not so sure anymore.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 12:09 PM
3

It's similar to the response to how most combat deaths are male. "Well most wars are started by men. (If women ruled the world, there wouldn't be any war.)" It's nonsense.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:44 AM
0

Don't forget: The women pictured in the elevator pressuring Senator Flake to push for an FBI investigation which was supposed to appear as a grassroots organic moment were actually part of an organization funded by none other than George Soros. This has been confirmed. Think about that for a minute.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:25 AM
3

In the centuries of feminist movements that have washed up and away, good men have not once organized their own mass movement to change themselves and their sons or to attack the mean-spirited, teasing, punching thing that passes for male culture. Not once. Bastards. Don’t listen to me. Listen to each other. Talk to each other. Earn your power for once. What absolutely irrational, ill-conceived, unexamined rambling verbal diarrhea. When have women ever gotten together to organize a mass movement…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:21 AM
1

Canada is falling apart. I blame our Prime Minister.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:15 AM
1

You should. You should be especially worried about the boys being raised today, and what effect this will ultimately have on our society.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:11 AM
1

You nailed this.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:08 AM
1

This is incorrect. You're putting the cart in front of the horse. No matter what we say we are vilified. Most of that opposition comes from the left. That pushes most of us to the right. Hence the wave of populism sweeping over our continent. In part, because people are sick of feminism. In part because people are sick of speaking their mind and getting vilified for it. MRAs didn't necessarily start on the right, but they are gradually being pushed their by an unreasonable mischaracterization of…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:06 AM
1

Why do people believe Ford here? There wasn't a single thing. Not a single shred of corroborating evidence that would have led you to believe her. She was more concerned about getting caffeine than actually talking about "what happened". What, if anything, makes you "believe" her? Is it simply because she's a woman? If a man had told this same story, would you believe it?
/r/MensRights13/10/18 01:16 AM
1

hanging everything on allegations of events of 30+ years ago was a stupid tactic of feminists who only ended up damaging themselves That's the only correct thing you've said here.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 01:13 AM
1

This is a lazy argument. It doesn't matter what you think. Everyone is entitled to the same rights as you are. Plus, you've never met him. What are you basing this on? What the media is telling you? You do realize this was a political assassination attempt, and the media behaved in a very dishonest manner here, right? Start using your own head next time inside of blindly following the crowd.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 01:10 AM
3

I wasn't talking about you my friend! Take care!
/r/MensRights11/10/18 05:43 PM
4

I'm not necessarily talking about hate posts. There seems to be a sudden influx of "fake accounts". Agents provocateurs. Ever since the RedPill got deplatformed. Do you know what I mean?
/r/MensRights11/10/18 05:42 PM
2

Lol. What? Hey everyone, when did this sub get flooded with fake users?
/r/MensRights11/10/18 05:12 PM
4

'Your daddy is a very horrible person' and 'lots of people hate your daddy'. Oh my goodness. What a terrible thing to say.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 03:16 PM
2

He's a feminist shill pretending to care about men. So he's like alleged sexual predator Michael Kimmel then? ;)
/r/MensRights11/10/18 02:56 PM
13

This article can't be real. I mean, come on. Nobody is that stupid. Is this some sort of false flag prank article again? This is one of the dumbest things I've ever read.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 02:50 PM
3

Whoosh! It's like my point went right over your head.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 02:45 PM
5

Before people figured out it was a fake video, it received quite substantial coverage in terms of Western media. Well, not by the CBC of course. The CBC would never report anything damaging the reputation of their precious leader Justin Trudeau, or that of feminism.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 01:20 PM
29

Oh, look at that. More misandry from BuzzFeed.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 04:58 PM
2

I really liked this post. Thank you for sharing. I love getting inside information from the women close to me. Every once in a while I'll get a snippet that just kind of makes everything else click. The other day a female artist friend of mine told me about her gallery opening. She said she's selling it as "Feminist Art". She said it sells several times better when she pushes that angle. "Feminism is a business", she said. Great story. File it away under "insight". Thank you for sharing.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 04:45 PM
2

I disagree. She was pointing out the hypocrisy of other females.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 03:52 PM
0

You don't see any relationship red flags in this? Whoa. That's what you got from that? I thought that was a great line. OP, your gf sounds alright.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 03:51 PM
12

There is a concerted effort in play on the Internet and in the media to silence people speaking up and telling the truth. We are in an age of censorship.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 10:11 PM
1

My apologies.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 06:11 PM
2

I've mentioned this to countless people. The truth is, nobody cares. Nobody cares about a man's suffering. That's just the stark truth.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 04:13 PM
13

She's absolutely right. Women "who don't wear the pink pussy hat" are the ones who need to take charge here. All that happens to us: We get attacked, banned, even fired. There is an active campaign of censorship against us. This extends to the media, the workplace, and even into our private circles. We're not allowed to speak. Heck, we've even been told to "shut up". With loud thundering applause no less. We need women's help here. We cannot do this alone.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 04:09 PM
-1

The very fact you know what an alt account is despite supposedly being a "new user" pretty much confirms you are an alt account. Are you having fun?
/r/MensRights08/10/18 03:50 PM
12

Yup. There's pure unadulterated censorship happening right now on Reddit. It is wrong-headed, and it is pathetic. Having said that, all it does is legitimize our position.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 03:31 PM
0

Alt account?
/r/MensRights08/10/18 03:30 PM
21

This is one of the saddest stories I've ever heard. His brother also died because of an overdose of anti-depressants... Man. Talk about the medical community completely screwing over an entire family. This happened in Canada. This happened in Canada.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 03:27 PM
2

I thought I felt my hair ruffle as I read your post. Yeah, me too as I wrote it lol. But truly, I believe this is what many men are doing. Maybe not consciously. It sometimes feels like they say they are a "feminist" in order to gain favour with their female friends. If I were a woman, I would not be wary of MRAs. I would be most wary of the male feminists.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 03:19 PM
3

I was being slightly tongue and check. But it seems to have worked for Justin Trudeau.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 02:08 PM
2

I believe we're all equal. Don't you?
/r/MensRights08/10/18 02:07 PM
2

Pretend you're a feminist.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 01:38 PM
10

False flag posters. It's happening all over Reddit. We've confirmed their presence in /r/Metacanada. It's exactly as you said. Alt accounts appear in the targeted subreddit, say any manner of sexist/racist/bigotry, and give moderators and admin justification for censorship. It's a problem.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 03:28 PM
12

Well, it's working. The scariest thing in society is not a man in a dark alley. It's an angry woman with a cell phone.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 11:45 PM
3

Daily Reminder: Amy Schumer is family related to Chuck Schumer, who is a Democrat Senator whom many believe plays a large role in initiating the Kavanaugh Circus and anti-Republican sentiment in general across the United States.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 03:25 PM
1

Has Jordan Peterson commented on this yet? This is exactly what he has been talking about.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 11:04 PM
1

Where was I lying??
/r/MensRights03/10/18 07:13 AM
2

Wow. Very cool video. Worth watching.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:03 AM
1

You've cited exactly zero sources. You haven't made any substantiated arguments. You haven't presented any facts whatsoever. I simply said it was the Republicans who acted reasonably here. Not the Democrats. The Democrats acted like disingenuous immature brats.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 05:41 AM
1

Well that's very productive. /s Why. Why can we not just have a conversation.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 05:25 AM
0

Ah, yes. The classic Democrat talking point. "It wasn't us! It was the Republicans!" Okay dude. We don't agree, and you've shown me absolutely nothing to back up your points. Let's just move on with our lives.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 12:55 AM
1

Where did I say the budget was ever balanced by Republicans?
/r/MensRights03/10/18 12:12 AM
1

True. The system sucks. Have you seen the new Michael Moore Movie? He pretty much arrives at the same conclusion. They are all evil.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 10:02 PM
2

Well that isn't even remotely close to accurate. I just googled this, and this is the very first thing that came up. https://goo.gl/images/vWxvoY Do you have any resources or anything you would like to share? But hey, look at that. I don't call you a "liar". What's with you guys and calling everyone a "liar"?
/r/MensRights02/10/18 09:59 PM
2

Well, it wasn't "only" based on that. Thank you very much. All I'm saying for the purposes of this conversation. The Democrats behaved like immature disingenuous sanctimonious virtue signalers interested not either in the truth, nor the protection of women. But rather simple partisan politics. They were vile during that hearing. It has been noted.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 07:50 PM
1

That's a bald-faced lie. Reagan quadrupled the debt. Clinton reduced the deficit and balanced the budget. Bush doubled spending and tripled the debt again. Obama cut the annual deficit by 2/3rds. Trump and the GOP doubled the annual deficit. What are you talking about? Obama was the single biggest contributor to the public debt in the history of the United States. Republicans believe in a smaller government and less interference with the economy. That's another lie. Republicans believe in corpor…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 07:36 PM
0

Huh. Adding $20T of debt Whoa whoa. Hold on there. That was the Democrats. in order to give money for the rich, allowing corporations to increase the pollution that kills people, slashing wages whenever possible, trying to destroy Social Security and Medicare, breaking up families and putting children in jails ... Republicans believe in a smaller government and less interference with the economy. This is a principled idea. It isn't "taking away money" from Social Security. Whenever Social Securi…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 07:18 PM
4

... And if I'm pointing this out, I must be a Trump Supporter. Therefore, I must be racist and sexist. Steps up to the pyre
/r/MensRights02/10/18 06:13 PM
6

Yeah, no. That's false. I grew up believing Republicans were evil. But what I've seen through this entire episode, are the Republicans are actually very reasonable people. The Democrats are the ones being disingenuous and unreasonable. Take care of your own house.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:38 PM
8

Then do something to tell your party and its members to shape up. What I saw at the Kavanaugh hearing was despicable. It was enough for me to loathe Democrats from now until further notice. They were vile and disingenuous in that hearing. I used to be a Liberal. Never again. Not until the rot and the evil has been purged.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:35 PM
2

But but... Feminists assured me this never happens!!
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:32 PM
3

You cannot and must not apologize to these people.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:29 PM
9

"If the day comes you are accused of some crime or tort of which you are not guilty, and you find your peers automatically believing your accuser, I expect you find yourself a stronger proponent of due process than you are now,” emailed Professor James Moore. That sounds reasonable. How dare someone say something reasonable! GET HIM!!
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:28 PM
3

I've had several similar situations. I've learned to not comment on Facebook, ever. This is why we have Reddit. So that we can discuss freely under the protection of semi-anonymity. Unfortunately, Facebook has become a hoard. An angry mob of people intimidating and bullying everyone into submission. This is what your aunt is doing to you know, even though she doesn't even realize this. A. Never apologize to these people. If you apologize, they will take this as admission of guilt, and will furth…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:24 PM
1

Wow. The amount of mental gymnastics these people play is astounding. I think these people need a vacation. This is getting ridiculous.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 04:27 PM
7

It's like Olympic level mental gymnastics. "Toxic Masculinity means men never show emotion!!" "Brett Kavanaugh showed too much emotion!!" "Her story is totally consistent! I totally believe her!" (But she's changed like six different major points throughout the entire story.) "Yeah, but it doesn't matter if she can't remember everything." "Brett Kavanaugh is lying about Devil's Triangle!! We know more about what his yearbook statement was than he does!!" It's absurd. It has become a complete sha…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 04:12 PM
6

Swetnick did not confirm that she saw Kavanaugh spike punch, but simply said she “saw him around the punch containers.” Oh. Well then, he must have spiked it.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 04:07 PM
10

...He's now been suspended. ...And now he's trending on Twitter. ...And now he's a meme. ...And now his life is ruined. ...And now he's fired.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 04:01 PM
6

"A guy raped me. And then we dated for a while after that." I think what she means is they dated, she now regrets it, and looks back negatively at the past. Somehow, that has now become "rape".
/r/MensRights02/10/18 03:58 PM
13

What a retarded idea. Keep alienating all men, even the ones that keep you safe, for the crime of having been born male. See what a great society you build. I got the popcorn ready. Really good point.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 09:07 PM
3

"Women have choices, men have responsibilities." Warren Farrell.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:09 PM
3

Somewhere ironic her name is "Fair".
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:07 PM
11

You mean, women don't necessarily want to work in STEM? Why didn't anyone try to warn us!?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:05 PM
12

It sounds like we have another James Damore here. He's right. He makes well reasoned arguments. He presents facts and data. Nothing of what he says is offensive. ...And he becomes a target, a nail to be hammered in, a grinding stone for the voracious feminist maw. We need more people like him to stand up and push back against this rule by mob mentality.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 03:57 PM
16

They will feel annihilated why? Because you told them to be? Why would they feel "annihilated"? Because a man didn't sexually assault a woman 36 years ago? PS - Justin Trudeau. I didn't hear about anyone feeling "annihilated" when "straight white privileged male" PM Justin Trudeau "got away" with it. Message to MeToo: Until you call for an investigation into Trudeau, you have lost all credibility. Your hypocrisy belies the entire narrative. And we noticed.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 09:09 PM
8

Excellent essay. Recommended Reading.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 03:45 PM
6

"This is who is deciding the fate of women in North America." No, it's not. Wrong. This isn't about "sexual violence against women" or "women's rights". This is about due process. This is about whether he did it or not. If he didn't do it, then these people can all fuck off. They can sit the fuck down, and they can accept that not everything relates back to their social justice related causes. They can remember rule of law, and why it exists. To protect people from the mob. Which is what this ci…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 02:37 PM
24

I keep hearing: "So what? He won't lose his job. He's just not getting that promotion. No big deal! It isn't THAT bad what they are doing. Why is he being so dramatic?" (For heaven's sake give me strength.) Meanwhile, I also hear this: "This is about rape victims! Even if he didn't do it, it's still important to send the message to women around this country that it is okay to come forward about sexual assault!" (What? What message? It's okay to come forward with false allegations from 36 years a…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 12:38 AM
0

Him yelling about a democratic conspiracy throws all semblance of impartiality out the window. What? No it doesn't. He's absolutely right. He's saying it exactly as it is. If anything, it proves his honesty. His work with Starr throws impartiality out the window. Ah, the bitterness of the Clinton scandal. One thing we know for sure. Clinton actually did it. So are you saying this is "revenge"? Because that wouldn't be a good thing. I would not support that. Is that what you expect from governmen…
/r/MensRights29/09/18 11:53 PM
7

What would be the point? I don't want to be a part of an echo chamber. The idea of Internet discussion is to experience and debate different points of view. The Liberal Censors are doing themselves a great disservice silencing us. They believe it will make them "win". It doesn't. Instead, we all lose when we aren't allowed to communicate.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 10:23 PM
22

I've been saying exactly this loud and clear all over the Internet. I keep getting intimidated, silenced and banned wherever I go. There is a coordinated and concentrated effort on the internet using mods, influencers and media to steer public opinion.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 08:52 PM
0

What do you mean I couldn't answer? You didn't ask that question. What are you talking about. Yes I believe in impartial judiciary. I believe this is why he was nominated. He has spent a lifetime studying law, and hundreds of sources vouch for his impartiality.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 03:08 PM
0

Apropo Starr's wellknown backroom crony leaker. At least some honesty. Do you believe this is about revenge? Because frankly that sickens me. Besides, Clinton actually did it. This entire thing is a farce. Special K is absolutely innapropriate as a SCJ given his partisan hackery. He can't even maintain a pretense of impartiality. What are you basing this on? Everyone knows he's innapropriate. I don't care even slightly about any of these charges. He is simply absolutely unfit for this position. …
/r/MensRights29/09/18 04:39 AM
8

CAN YOU JUST IMAGINE THE PAIN OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SEE YOUR CHILDREN????
/r/MensRights28/09/18 10:21 PM
2

This is horrible. I'm sorry for what happened to you, and I'm very sorry to hear this.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 10:16 PM
2

The other day my friend told me she had read, "all sorts of evil and misogyny in TheRedPill". Because of that, and because Cassie Jaye decided to name her movie The Red Pill, she now staunchly refuses to see that movie. Sigh... People man. So I asked her what examples or links or anything she could think of to prove this "misogyny". She cited nothing. Gave nothing. Couldn't recall a single comment that bothered her. Not even a notion of a comment. So. That's kind of what we're dealing with here.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 10:13 PM
1

You are right. Aaron Schwartz would be rolling in his grave.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 10:09 PM
1

I've already answered this, are you even reading my posts? I am reading your posts, and no you have not answered it. You questioned his meaning of it, but you have not offered an alternative meaning. Again, its not even about the content of it, he was point blank asked what these meant and he gave horseshit answers Again, what makes you think they were "horseshit"? https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/kavanaugh/card/1538060501?ns=prod/accounts-wsj Oh... Was it on a "monitor" in the corner of a room …
/r/MensRights28/09/18 10:07 PM
1

One standard for some, a different standard for others. Feminism: "Equality!" Feminism: "Some are more equal than others."
/r/MensRights28/09/18 07:18 PM
1

This is the only true statement I've read today.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 07:16 PM
1

There’s no cryptic meaning to Devil’s Triangle and boofing, and there’s misunderstanding or misinterpreting of him being misleading/lying in his past What does "Devil's Triangle" and "Boofing" mean then? It's a fucking yearbook comment from 36 years ago. Don't be ridiculous. It was also reported that he did in fact watch Fords testimony after claiming he did not, either bad reporting or again another lie What? Where? Regardless, he comes off as a liar No he most certainly does not. That line of …
/r/MensRights28/09/18 06:48 PM
1

We're definitely not going to convince each other. If the best evidence of him lying is disagreeing about the cryptic meaning of an inside joke written in a yearbook 36 years ago. Then, no. No, I'm not going to entertain that notion as worthy of consideration. Let's stop being crazy people here and get back to reality please.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 05:19 PM
1

With all due respect, you are performing a great deal of mental gymnastics here. Kavanaugh absolutely deflected every question No, he did not. There were some incredibly silly questions, that's for sure. as to why he would or wouldn’t want an investigation “I’m game for whatever the committee wants” is not a yes or no, No, it's not a yes or no. He's the defendent. It doesn't matter if he gives a yes or no. Nor should that even be a question. It isn't up to him what the committee decides. His ans…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:39 PM
1

I dunno, an investigation would be nice They have sworn statements from all the involved parties. An FBI investigation isn't binding. Ultimately, it is still up to the judiciary committee to make the confirmation. The issue is, an FBI investigation might take up to a year. It might take until after the next federal election. The Democrats know this, this is why they keep using this cheap tactic as their rallying point. No the FBI background checks Kavanaugh has had up to this point are not suffi…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 02:36 PM
2

So what should they do now?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:43 AM
1

Did you watch the hearing today?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:31 AM
13

Slam dunk.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 11:58 PM
32

Apparently there are "right" opinions, and "wrong" opinions.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 11:51 PM
29

You couldn't make this shit up. According to Reddit, "positive" masculinity is becoming a servant for women and women's causes. We have in part Michael Kimmel to thank for that. "Now that's he's used up his usefulness, he can be fed to the lions just like the others." - Feminism. Would it not be possible for "positive masculinity" to simply mean holding a positive view of masculinity?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 11:49 PM
5

Clarence Thomas. But also because MeToo hadn't yet been properly weaponized.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 10:49 PM
3

I'm listening to kavanaugh defend himself as I write this. Me too. I'm shaking. This is very upsetting. He also sounds credible. Its hard to know. I think that with the stakes so high, without proof from either side and both sides sound credible, then the judge should not be confirmed. No. Burden of proof falls on the positive claim. You simply cannot disprove a negative. There is too much at stake. Yes, you're right. The concept of "innocent until proven guilty" is a fundamental bedrock princip…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:44 PM
1

It honestly doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:14 PM
5

Is the hearing today not sufficient enough for you? What else could the FBI possibly uncover here?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:57 PM
4

Ah, no. Much worse. Go ahead and try it. Actually, I know what will happen. It will be taken down immediately. You might even get banned. It might be an interesting experience for you. If you want an investigation for both, I have no real issue. I disagree, but I have no real issue.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:43 PM
4

Well I'm an adult. Am I allowed to have an opinion?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:40 PM
7

My narrative just got "blown the fuck out of the water"? Ummm... No. No, it did not. So that's great you say that. I believe you. To demonstrate your good faith, why don't you go ahead and start a thread in /r/Canada entitled, "I hereby call for an investigation into Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's groping allegation". Watch what happens then.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:38 PM
4

Maybe. I honestly don't think I'm qualified to make that decision. However, I will say this. This is a very common method for the media to lead us to reach a certain conclusion. "But multiple women couldn't have lied?" Well, but they could be mistaken. They could all be politically motivated. They might all believe they need to "stand together for women". The truth is, multiple accusations does not necessarily mean anything.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:36 PM
8

Are you saying this changes anything? Are you suggesting that someone's life should be ruined because of an unconfirmed and unverified allegation?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:24 PM
8

True. Do you understand what, "innocent until proven guilty" means?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:13 PM
15

Yes I do. I believe a man's life shouldn't be destroyed by mere accusations. I agree. This is different. Why? The entire country and even the entire world will be affected by this confirmation process. By all accounts, he's a very competent and fair individual. It's not just Kavanaugh's life and fortune and stake. This isn't the hill to do battle on over the right's of the accused. I disagree. This is absolutely that hill. If he goes down, we have effectively displayed that MeToo can be weaponiz…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:12 PM
8

I'm inviting you to have a civil discussion. Would you like to have a conversation about this? You seem really worked up. Do you believe in "Innocent until proven guilty"?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:52 PM
13

Ah. I get it. We're being brigaded here.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:50 PM
14

Questioning those who were there, under oath. Thats a good start. How closely did you follow the Jian Ghomeshi Trial? All three complainants, lied under oath. They were shown to be lying. Not misremembering, not being unsure of the details. They were lying. We need proof. And frankly, there is no suitable proof from 36 years ago. Innocent until proven guilty. I will die on that hill defending that fundamental bedrock principle of our justice system. Questioning the people that have been informed…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:47 PM
5

From 36 years ago.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:40 PM
11

What are the FBI going to investigate? One vague story that maybe happened from 36 years ago? Come on.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:20 PM
4

Would you care to elaborate? Or make any points whatsoever?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:18 PM
7

This is exactly how I feel. This is intentional as you pointed out. They want to intimidate us into complacency and silence. We need to be doing the exact opposite. Stand in the way of tyranny.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:41 PM
19

This accuser against Kavanaugh sounds legitimate. Based on what? Her story has the smack of truth to it. That boys lined up outside bedrooms waiting to take their turn to "train gang rape" drunk college girls? No it doesn't. That's nonsense. A supreme court nomination isn't the same thing as a criminal trial. The mere possibility of it being true is and SHOULD BE enough to stop someone from being confirmed to the most powerful governing body of the most powerful nation for life. No it should not…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:35 PM
-3

It's on now.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:27 PM
2

Totally fair. Thank you. I don’t think it has any bearing on his innocence or guilt either, nor should it. Ever. We match up there. Isn't that all that matters here? It would be hard to like somebody knowing we disagreed on something so monumental that, for me, feels very tied to my gender and autonomy. One thing I would like to say about this issue. Your reproductive rights aren't going anywhere. I don't know what State you live in, but they aren't going anywhere. No one is going to take that a…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:26 PM
34

Our society has gone completely crazy. There is no other explanation.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 09:25 AM
5

Sorry, I didn't mean to jump on you. You are offering your point of you, and thank you for the debate. I've now heard several people make this same "I don't like him" argument. All I'm saying is, if we base our society on, "I don't like him", we're opening up the door for a whole world of hate. Besides, you don't even know him. At least, I don't think. Maybe you don't like what he represents. But that isn't the same as disliking him. It also has no bearing on whether he's guilty or not. That's a…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 01:41 AM
7

That being said-- this guy labels birth control as an "abortion inducing drug" and wants to make it harder for women to have access to contraceptives. I heard this same argument today. "Well he's an asshole. Who cares what happens to him." I think this is a terrible argument. I think this is absolutely deplorable. This isn't about whether you agree or disagree with his politics. This is about what's right and what's wrong. Losing your job, livelihood, career, because of an allegation from 36 yea…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 11:29 PM
12

Jimmy Kimmel said that if Kavanaugh becomes a Supreme Court justice, we should "cut that pesky penis of his off in front of everyone." Jimmy Kimmel, the eternal sell out. What an unbelievably unfair and unwarranted comment. This is not helping the situation. Jimmy Kimmel should be ashamed of himself.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 11:08 PM
73

War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength. Men are Women. Women are Men. Everyone is Equal. But some are more Equal than others.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 10:55 PM
1

What the fuck is this.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 10:11 PM
13

The other day I was told, "You're a straight white male. Your opinion doesn't matter." These people are supposedly the ones trying to break down the barriers of racism and sexism. Think about that for a moment.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:29 PM
3

I have no idea what you are talking about here. I was talking about Michael Kimmel having an allegation of sexual harrassment against him.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:37 AM
218

Daily Reminder: The man mostly responsible for, and who has profited his entire life from promoting the sexist idea of "toxic masculinity", Michael Kimmel, is now also facing allegations of sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:26 PM
11

“he very much is against women’s reproductive choice.” - Senator Hirono And here is the entire crux of the controversy. It is political. This isn't about right or wrong, or whether it happened or not. It's about the "right" way of thinking, and the "wrong" way of thinking. This is disgraceful. It is nothing short of a disgrace for a Senator to eschew fundamental presumption of innocence rights in order to achieve a political agenda. She should be ashamed of herself. As should anyone supporting t…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:33 PM
3

There are likely better sources that aren't so sensationalized. Like where? Main stream media won't print this stuff. So, where?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:13 AM
16

And, oh, do the women know how to milk that for all it's worth, while the men, poor wimps, stand by and meekly watch.' This is so goddamn true. Men are folding like cheap tents in the wind these days. Everyone is terrified. No one wants the target on them. Have you ever noticed how any time a man addresses MeToo he always begins with, "Well, it's an important movement, and I think it's important. But..." Don't forget, real truth is only spoken after the word "but". Men are being such pussies rig…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:13 AM
1

What nonsense is this? Yeah, okay. They "made it up". She didn't really say those things. They just pulled them completely out of their ass. How would that make any sense?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:59 AM
2

Bang on. She speaks the truth.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:58 AM
3

I feel like we were talking about this yesterday. The first question is, what exactly is the definition of a "false accusation"? Is it when the accuser outright lies? Or is it if there was no conviction? That would obviously change the outcome by quite a bit. What would be the opposite of a false accusation? Would it be a "positive accusation"? Would a "positive accusation" mean a conviction? Would then not the opposite of that mean a "false accusation"? There is another feminist statistic: Out …
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:53 AM
5

What is happening? Our society is fucked. That's what's happening. We are social creatures. Being accepted and praises by our peers is of paramount importance to us, and that goes for everyone. Nobody wants to be the villain. Everyone wants to be the good guy. I think what is happening, is a group of vengeful social justice warriors have slowly but gradually taken over most social media and Internet venues. We see that in the media. We see this on social media. Twitter, YouTube, Google, and now …
/r/MensRights24/09/18 11:11 PM
2

"What are they going to do. Accuse him of sexual assault?" Bhahahahaha!! Nailed it. Funny because it's true. I'm way more terrified of a woman with a cell phone than Thanos these days.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 10:23 PM
1

Somebody probably did. That is indeed the worst part.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 10:08 PM
4

Because people don't really want equality.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 02:20 PM
5

This person is obviously a child who still doesn't have much life experience. The day her brother, father, friend or boyfriend gets falsely assured, she will change her tune.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 02:19 PM
16

I agree. But that argument gains a lot of leverage with women. Most women seem incapable of understand first that false accusations can happen, and second that they are devastating. They also don't really seem to care. I'll often hear women saying, "I don't care if he lost his job". Without even considering everything else he may have lost. For a false accusation let's not forget. That's how bad the environment is right now. That's how much women (and feminist men) prioritize women's suffering o…
/r/MensRights24/09/18 04:12 AM
11

I love Joe Rogan. There aren't many people who have accomplished as much as he has. Who the hell is Becca Lewis?
/r/MensRights24/09/18 03:46 AM
1

Exactly correct.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 11:23 AM
5

What is the definition of "false accusation"? If the accuser deliberately lies? Or if there is no conviction? Could it be something in the middle? What if we could see a graph for "proven accusations"? I've seen plenty of stats suggesting the conviction rate is extremely low. Could we not conceivably say, "only 2-10% of accusations are 'proven'". This is why there are, "lies, damned lies, and statistics." These stats were created as a crudgel to intimidate us into silence, and to curry public fa…
/r/MensRights22/09/18 04:13 AM
3

And of course the same should be done for Trudeau. Just because they are the 1% doesn't mean that laws don't apply. As long as you say so for Justin Trudeau as well, we have no issue. There is an enormous double standard at work here. Only certain men are targeted. Only certain women are to be believed. What we are doing as a society right now isn't right. I fear worse is coming.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 02:48 AM
1

What sexual abuse?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 10:33 PM
1

If Kavanagh goes down, we are all fucked. It will mean anyone (any man) can go down at any time, for any frivolous reason. Years from now, just when you'll be getting your life together, somebody can just appear out of nowhere and sabotage your entire life. Even if she's lying. No repercussions to her. No matter how much you try to clear your name, people still don't believe you. It's total insanity.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:34 PM
1

I'd like to hear her out. You have heard her out. It happened 36 years ago. When they were 17 and 15. And even by her own admission, nothing actually happened. Theres no rush Well, there was no rush for 36 years you mean. Now, with the appointment imminent. Um, yes. There is a rush. and it's important. What's important about this!? That 36 years ago he might have pushed himself on to her in a room at a party, and then let her go? What part of this is "important"? You haven't had any accusers, be…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:29 PM
6

Do you want the truth? It's because he's a conservative. More so, he's Trumps SCOTUS pick. The left is so hell bent on any and everything anti-trump that all human decency goes out the window. You are exactly correct. Everything you have written here is bang on. Same thing happening here in Canada. Erin Weir? "Oh, these are 'serious' allegations." Justin Trudeau? "Oh, well there's nothing we can do about it. Stop trying to make this a partisan issue." What? Do these people hear themselves!?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:08 PM
1

No point in discussing this on Facebook. I've learned the hard way. Lost a lot of friends. I was very much vilified, just for making respectful, solid points that go against the narrative. They don't deserve your time.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:23 PM
3

I suppose she also believes that Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is guilty and should just shut up as well?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:17 PM
4

I'm sure the Twitter outrage crowd will apologize now that the facts have been presented. I won't hold my breath.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 10:01 PM
16

Here's the thing about witch hunts. They always eventually eat their own.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 09:30 PM
4

gets popcorn
/r/MensRights17/09/18 09:27 PM
3

You're safe here brother. We're all working on this together. One day at a time.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 04:23 AM
2

I have no words. There are no words to express how absolutely insane this is.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:25 PM
1

It has always been egregiously misused and misunderstood as an admission of fault. This is why you can never apologize to these people. They are hysterical, and they are dishonest.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 02:50 PM
1

He studied gender studies. He's been brainwashed. Not his fault. Four years later, he's been acquitted of all charges. The accusers have turned out not only to be lying, but also conspiring. He apologized once, and people still claim this as "proof" of his guilt. You can never apologize to these people. They are unreasonable.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:18 PM
1

He's back. Good for him for standing up for himself. Canada has been in full on lunatic mode since this story broke. We don't have to lie down and take it any longer.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 04:18 PM
8

#4. Give women space. #29. Offer to accompany female friends if they have to walk home alone at night…or in a public space where they may be likely to feel unsafe. Which one is it?
/r/MensRights14/09/18 02:56 PM
11

Feminism continues to descend into irrelevance through petty bickering and immature complaints. Men are dying. But instead, we're talking about how an iPhone is a quarter of an inch too big for women. This is what modern women's rights looks like.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 02:34 PM
1

Thank you for this. I have a question. Why should I mask my IP address before searching? Thank you.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 02:22 PM
6

Wait. What is this? I'm being targeted too. It's obvious by the voting patterns in what I write. Is this a tool to try to get other users banned?
/r/MensRights14/09/18 05:09 AM
1

Also note, it's mostly conservatives who took the abuse.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:17 PM
2

Good stuff. Thank you.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:07 PM
2

He was expelled because a third-party investigation found one harassment complaint and three sexual harassment complaints against him credible. That makes it implausible that this is all just in everyone else's head. I'm not sure how closely you've been following this story. Did you read the linked training letter? The good faith reading of him is that he's someone who can get worked up enough in the moment that he loses track of how he comes across. The bad faith reading of him is that he's a j…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:45 AM
2

Wait, why don't we just say, "womansplaining"?
/r/MensRights07/09/18 11:02 PM
1

Womanslaughter?
/r/MensRights07/09/18 11:02 PM
1

I insist on being referred to as "Your Royal Majesty". People who don't know this, who have never met me before and refer to me as anything other than "Your Royal Majesty" will feel my wrath on Twitter.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 09:11 PM
2

That isn't the point. The point is that it has never been about honestly or consistency. If women didn't love Trudeau so much, he'd be toast. We have several other MPs who have lost their jobs or who have been humiliated by the press and social media for much more minor "indiscrestions". We had an MP, who lost his cabinet position, was forced to take a "sensitivity seminar", and was chastised in public by Trudeau himself just for saying "yummy" to a woman in an elevator. The journalist in questi…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 04:10 PM
5

Then Joe goes out there and gets injured or killed. And people wonder why Joe gets paid more.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 03:24 PM
1

It's always amazing to me. If you say the opposite - that more men commit suicide - it's either met with complete indifference, or with anger and attacks of "misogyny". How is it "misogyny" for pointing out more men commit suicide?
/r/MensRights31/08/18 03:10 PM
1

It's not like the main stream narrative has ever really given us a fair shake.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 03:07 PM
1

He missed one. Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:25 AM
7

We have a Prime Minister in Canada who calls himself a feminist. He has been accused of sexual harassment. And nobody, not the media, not social media, not #MeToo even pretended to care.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:25 AM
4

Then, in the very best scene where she is talking with Karen Straughn, Karen brings up Julie Bindel and the "men in concentration camps" rhetoric. The reporter claims to "disavow" these people (she doesn't), then asks Karen why she doesn't disavow MGTOW and incels - as though MGTOW and incel are on a level of "putting all men into concentration camps". Honestly, the episode wasn't as bad as I had expected. But again, my main complaint is asking a BuzzFeed feminist reporter to cover the Men's Rig…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 03:58 PM
11

Among other things presented during that episode. They went to a recently opened Victims of domestic violence shelter in the United States. They made it seem like, "See? There "?is a shelter for male victims of domestic violence." They didn't mention it was just two years old. They asked the director of the shelter if they had been helped by any of the MRA groups. She said no. The effect was supposed to be, "See? MRAs really don't care about male victims of domestic violence." Naturally, the Tor…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 02:59 PM
2

It's a show on Netflix called "Follow This". I believe it's episode 6? You'll recognize which episode it is right away if you can find that show.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 02:51 PM
3

You're not wrong. Once we hit a critical mass of roughly 10% of the population, it might start to snowball after that.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 02:50 PM
8

Watched it yesterday and wanted to comment! My goodness. They get a female, obviously feminist reporter from BuzzFeed to cover the Men's Rights Movement. For fucks sakes. That's like asking Paul Elam to inform the public about Feminism. I'm really sick and tired of news organizations giving us this "inside look" into Men's Rights, and then completely mischaracterizing and misrepresenting it. A very real part of the problem was in who they assigned this to. Why would you get a super hardcore femi…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 02:43 PM
3

I know. I read it. I mean, I can't believe she wrote that. It's absurd. I hope she gets reprimanded.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 02:17 PM
6

I can't believe a professor would have said that.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:53 AM
1

“The reason I haven’t released a statement is because I’ve frankly been extremely humbled by this event. I had to take a step back and realise that in my own activism while I fight hard with passion—I need to evolve.” She's actually said something truthful and with substance. For once.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:40 PM
1

Yeah, I have a hard time believing that guy is real.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:42 PM
5

Then again, you would have to be a feminist to work for Vice. They wouldn't hire anyone else.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:41 PM
0

Vice Media is fucking pathetic.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:30 PM
2

Every woman I know wants #MeToo to succeed, not just by punishing the perpetrators but also by raising our expectations of what constitutes acceptable sexual conduct. Every decent man must feel the same way. Any attempt to make excuses for women that would never fly for men undermines that goal. Do you know what I want from the #MeToo Movement? I don't want to feel guilty as a man anymore. That's it. I don't want to be constantly brow-beaten, berated, attacked, belittled, humiliated, every singl…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:39 PM
6

Are you drinking Asia Argento's and the end of the #MeToo Movement's tears as well?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:20 PM
6

Victim Blaming.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:19 PM
1

It merely has the appearance of hypocrisy... Lol. What? Do these people even read what they write?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:56 PM
4

Yeah... It's despicable. I don't even have enough words to describe how appalled I am by this blatant deflection of responsibility. Anthony Bourdain was a good man. I mean, I had never met him or anything like that. And I'm sure he was far from perfect. But he clearly was a talented, insightful, inspirational person for so many of us. To me, it just summarizes the whole MeToo Movement so well: Angry, selfish, childish, immature princesses who have never had to experience real pain in their lives…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 06:48 PM
15

I cannot believe she's using a man whom she drove to suicide as a scapegoat. This is despicable. I am appalled. Ladies and gentlemen, I hereby declare the end of #MeToo. No more pandering. No more dancing around the issue. Women are just as capable of shitty behaviour as men and I am no longer going to be made to feel like I should apologize for being a man.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 06:31 PM
1

Michael Kimmel. Michael "The only time I don't believe the victims, is when they are accusing me" Kimmel.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 07:20 AM
1

It seems like they've already done a good enough job of destroying their own movement anyway. Some people owe us an apology.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 06:00 AM
4

Christina Hoff Sommers is a saint.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:44 AM
3

I wonder if these people are aware of their own gaping hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:42 AM
3

Christie Blatchford with her another excellent article.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 02:42 PM
5

Jennifer Lawrence talked about how she was affected by the wage gap not long ago in one of her films, but it’s so dishonest. Actors aren’t even paid the same since they often have money attached to their name, and she apparently had some of hers placed into a separate account and also wasn’t even on set for as many hours as the two male actors she was with. I forget what film this was about, but that shouldn’t be hard to find. I heard this all from Karen Straughan as well. It was American Hustle…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 02:02 PM
1

Well, that has been my experience. I was targeted and harassed online by a few people self-identifying as feminists.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 03:06 PM
1

Hoisted by his own petard.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:54 PM
1

This is the man who has been pushing the phrase "toxic masculinity" in academia and in the media. Maybe he should examine his own toxic masculinity at this time.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:33 PM
2

Just like Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:28 PM
5

So this guy claims false accusations were not real, and now he's claiming they are real because he's the one targeted by them. Talk about self-serving. Just like Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:28 PM
5

Omg. Yes! Thank you!!
/r/MensRights02/08/18 01:27 PM
10

“I think this whole campaign served to settle old scores.” I think a lot of these campaigns are.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 07:39 PM
4

I don't agree. I do agree he is a liability for us PR wise. However, I believe feminists will try to find someone "bad", and will slander someone else within the group anyway. A movement that protests and shuts down Warren Farrell as "hate speech". Yeah, we're not dealing with honest people here. That being the case, Paul Elam is our lightning rod. He has become the guy who will take the brunt of the criticism.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 11:35 AM
22

When a feminist says something completely irrational: "Oh, but not all feminists are like that." When Paul Elam uses irony to prove a point: "LOOK AT WHAT THE MEN'S RIGHTS MOVEMENT BELIEVES!!"
/r/MensRights30/07/18 04:08 AM
5

What in the name of God is this.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 04:04 AM
1

Don't shoot the messenger.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 03:49 AM
3

Where do you live? I feel your pain. It's tough to know what to do. There's a group in Canada called "Cafe". https://equalitycanada.com Get in touch with them.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 03:21 AM
1

Well, I guess it's because you didn't even bother to Google it.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 03:18 AM
16

Vice Media is a pathetic organization. They should feel ashamed of themselves for being so blatantly dishonest.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 11:41 AM
2

That's why we have Reddit.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 04:17 AM
18

What a disgusting article. Nearly every single word in this article was nonsense. She had just experienced ghosting Ah... Excuse me? Women never ghost? Are you effing kidding me? Women definitely ghost. I would even venture to guess they do it way more often than men. “Men behave badly,” says psychotherapist and author Joan Kavanaugh, “because they can.” Well that's total nonsense. A. Men never get the benefit of the doubt. Like, literally never. B. Ah, women behave badly, because they can. Now,…
/r/MensRights29/07/18 04:17 AM
2

I actually quite like sitting down to pee. You don't have to worry about aim, you keep it clean, and you can check your phone while you do it. Lol. I'm not sure what the whole debate is anyway. The entire cover should be down at all times when not in use.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 03:42 AM
7

Lol. You always have the best answers.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 03:39 AM
8

Here is the link
/r/MensRights29/07/18 03:34 AM
7

Here is the link
/r/MensRights29/07/18 03:34 AM
4

So this article is complete bullshit. It again makes the assumption that all women are victims, and all men are perpetrators. They are, of course, wrong in this assumption. They claim to have published the acquittal of the U of O hockey boys. Four years later. They kind of conveniently glossed over that part. Four years these boys were caught in the lurch. Two years, the entire hockey program was shut down. You know what? Let's talk about how academic institutions handle sexual assault allegatio…
/r/MensRights29/07/18 01:38 AM
5

Yeah, the "women pay more argument" is complete horseshit. Has anyone here been on a date with a woman? And let me guess who paid. Oh, right. You did. Even after she gushed all night about how she believed in equality and how with her ex they always split the bill. You still paid. That's a man's life, right there. You can sit through two hours of insufferable bullshit about how a man's life is easier and privileged etc etc, and you still have to pay at the end of it.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 11:10 PM
1

#EmpathyGap
/r/MensRights27/07/18 04:28 PM
2

I really like where you're going with this.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 04:28 PM
1

Read the article.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 08:40 AM
30

I don't disagree. But women cost more in terms of health insurance. Should their premiums be higher?
/r/MensRights26/07/18 09:51 PM
15

I couldn't name you one F1 Driver. So you have me stumped there.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 09:48 PM
3

I see his point too. He's right in that he remains consistent, keeping exactly to the statistical probability. Too many feminists would argue statistical probability disadvantaging men for car insurance; but then turn right around and scream sexism if their health insurance premiums went up. (Remember the uproar over the tampon tax). That's not what he is doing here. On the point: If you don't like it, get a different insurance provider (or don't drive). I think our man in Alberta has found a so…
/r/MensRights26/07/18 09:47 PM
18

How does this have anything to do with transphobia?
/r/MensRights26/07/18 09:38 PM
14

Again, women cost the healthcare system more. Should they have to pay a higher premium for that? Yes. Everyone should pay for their own health care and insurance. Well, I can't argue with you there. At least you're consistent. You can imagine the uproar of course if women had to pay more for health insurance though. Right?
/r/MensRights26/07/18 08:52 PM
77

Exactly. Healthcare, for example. Imagine if insurance companies charged women more for costing the healthcare system more. Imagine the uproar.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 08:29 PM
21

That's how insurance works though. You charge people based on risk. Male drivers are riskier on average, Males get into more accidents because they log more hours of driving. That's pretty much it. If you don't like that, look for an insurance company who will assess risk based on other factors. Again, women cost the healthcare system more. Should they have to pay a higher premium for that?
/r/MensRights26/07/18 08:28 PM
11

The reason for that, is because men drive more often. #Equality! Why does the man always have to drive? Why can't the woman share in some of the driving work? ;) Women cost the healthcare system more. Should they have to pay a higher premium for that? I can only imagine the uproar that would cause.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 08:26 PM
34

If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. Thomas Jefferson
/r/MensRights26/07/18 07:43 PM
300

Our boy finally made it on to the CBC!! That guy is National Hero! He deserves a huge round of applause. Great work buddy!! #Equality
/r/MensRights26/07/18 05:29 PM
3

The experience left her feeling “a little bit angry, but more shocked and hurt.” “It was scary and it was upsetting,” she said. The horror! Oh the humanity!! How dare he manpologize to her for his inadequacies!
/r/MensRights26/07/18 03:17 PM
36

We can have women's only gyms. But the minute a 70-year-old male barber politely refuses and apologizes profusely for not feeling adequate enough in his profession to be able to deliver as quality a service as is his honed craft it becomes National News and a complaint at the human Rights commission. The experience left her feeling “a little bit angry, but more shocked and hurt.” “It was scary and it was upsetting,” she said. It was "scary" and "upsetting"? Are you fucking kidding me?
/r/MensRights26/07/18 01:45 PM
3

“For the most part, feminists’ reactions to reports of female violence toward men have ranged from dismissal to outright hostility. Straus chronicles a troubling history of attempts to suppress research on the subject, including intimidation of heretical scholars of both sexes and tendentious interpretation of the data to portray women’s violence as defensive.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:10 AM
3

What in the name of God is this? It's not enough that men are already having more orgasms than women. Wait. They are? Maybe self-induced orgasms. I have no doubt I masturbate more than my female colleagues for example. But when men and women are together? I would venture to guess women out orgasm men on the whole. The women I've been with orgasm more than I do. I make damn sure of that. Yes, you can call it "masculine achievement" if you would like. And? It's exactly like you said. How dare men …
/r/MensRights24/07/18 11:54 AM
0

Orwellian.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 12:14 AM
8

That has been my experience with Facebook, absolutely.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 08:52 PM
1

Theranos is a fascinating story. I'm sure there are plenty of other fradulent companies out there like this one.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 08:51 PM
17

"Unfounded". Note, according to feminist theory, these will not be considered "false accusations". Instead, they will be classified as "non convictions".
/r/MensRights23/07/18 08:47 PM
4

Vice Media is pathetic. They would sell out their own grandmother if it meant getting more clicks. What a pathetic organization.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 05:41 PM
6

But beneath all the hatred and dismissal are some kernels of truth. The MRM should work to rein in its radical elements and think carefully about how to get their messages through. I disagree. The media, academia and our governments are being dishonest with the people. We could be Saints preaching a message of peace, and the media, academia and government would still label us "misogynists". I'm done negotiating with them. And so should the rest of us. We are not dealing with reasonable people he…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 05:40 PM
3

what us sexist about that? Absolutely nothing. Vice Media is lying to us.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 05:30 PM
6

Vice Media is unapologetically a farce of a publication. Notice the claims of "misogyny", without citing a single reference. Not a single one. The author also tried to comment MRAs with white supremacy. Once again, he didn't cite a single example, nor did he even attempt to back up that (ludicrous) point. This is typical of the main stream media. It is extremely typical of Vice News. Pointing out flaws in feminist thinking is not "misogyny". Let's make that point ultra clear right now. This is a…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 05:29 PM
2

Feminism is not about equality. That's certainly a lie. It is about control and money.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 12:15 AM
1

Lol! That was a good one. Take care man. It's been nice talking to you. Let's move on for a while.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 05:40 AM
1

I'm certainly not "really dumb". I might be obtuse. How about you? Are you going to read that book?
/r/MensRights20/07/18 01:30 AM
1

Cheers. Thank you. I appreciate your comment. Have a great evening.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 01:00 AM
1

You are wrong on your points about "too drunk to consent" because you are mixing up what it actually does with the spin that some media puts on it. That's all. Actually, you just aren't aware. That's all. Are you going to read that book? There is nothing wrong with the law. Does the public fuck things up sometimes? 100%, absolutely, but sometimes the court of public opinion ruins the life of a suspected murderer or child molester that is innocent, should we do away with those laws as well? What …
/r/MensRights19/07/18 11:32 PM
6

"We may suffer alone, but we survive together." Well. Unless you are a man of course. Then you just suffer alone.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 11:28 PM
2

Fuck Obama.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 11:24 PM
1

Teaching people that "someone who is drunk cannot consent" absolutely does prevent those kinds of rapes from happening. A. Everyone knows rape is bad. There isn't a single person in the world, certainly not on university campus, certainly not a 19-year-old, who doesn't already know that. B. What "too drunk to consent" really is teaching: i. Women are not responsible for their actions when they are drunk. ii. Women need to be protected from men, who are always perpetrators. iii. A drunken consens…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 11:08 PM
1

I see where we are not seeing eye to eye. I do equate "too drunk to consent" with false accusations. Because that's what it is being used for. You don't seem to see that. Yet. Yet is a key word. Because you will come around. I'm ahead of the curve on this one. I have to give you time to catch up. "Too drunk to consent" is currently being employed by university investigations pertaining to sexual assault. And it is being used as a weapon by feminist groups to secure more sexual assault conviction…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 10:24 PM
1

It they were both relatively equal in level of intoxication you may have a point, but now you're basically arguing that if a drunk guy has sex with a styrofoam cup, the cup raped him. Of course, that's not what I'm arguing. I'm arguing that asinine campaign of "too drunk to consent" makes that case. Which, it does.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:40 PM
1

What witch hunt? The witch hunt where hundreds of boys have been expelled, put in jail, and forced to register as sex offenders for the rest of their lives because of frivolous charges and a politically charged social environment. And I have said roughly 300 times that a drunk girl with a sober guy is rape. You've also agreed a drunk guy with a sober girl is rape. But consent given while drunk is, from a factual and legal standpoint, not consent. Period. Okay. So basically everyone has been rape…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:39 PM
1

Nope, but you're the one arguing that you can do whatever you want to someone who is drunk as long as you've had a couple drinks. Nope. Not what I was arguing. Don't be stupid. You're arguing that Brock isn't a rapist because he was drunk, even if the girl was unconscious and/or barely able to function. Nope. Didn't argue that either. Avoid Man to the rescue!! I argued, successfully, that: If we apply the asinine logic of a "too drunk to consent" campaign to the Brock Turner case, we could succe…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:22 PM
1

I've already logically shown your points to be asinine and dumb. False accusations happen all the time. It's ridiculous to pretend they don't. "Sober guys don't have sex with drunk girls!?" What a dumb point. You mean, "sober girls don't have sex with drunk guys!?" Relationships have different parameters. Also, dumb point. A. Are you saying spousal rape doesn't exist? B. I could change "with my gf" to "the other night when I was drunk and a sober girl went home with me". It doesn't matter. You a…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:15 PM
1

How am I a "rape apologist"? Don't be stupid. Your points are dumb. I've already unraveled all of them, and I have attempted to correct you in your dumbass backwards thinking. But alas, it is impossible. You seem to want to believe that people are not responsible for their actions when they drink. And again, for the love of god. "Incapacitated" is not the same thing as "drunk". Get your head out of your ass and stop pandering to bullshit ideologies.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:04 PM
1

NO! Stop saying this, it's not accurate. The "campaign" is the legal standard that diminished mental capacity means you are not able to consent. That isn't what Ellie Johnson is arguing in her "crusade" here. That's not the way students are interpreting the campaign. As evidenced in this article, which you refuse to acknowledge. If it really is as you say, why not say, "incapacitated is unable to consent"? That would be acceptable. They need to have this "campaign" because far too many people th…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 03:48 PM
1

This is where we disagree. The base assumption is that if someone is too drunk to consent, sex is rape. I think the source of our contention, is in the interpretation of the word "drunk". I'm not taking "drunk" to mean "incapacitated". I believe you are. This is where we are not seeing eye to eye. So then, where do you draw the line? I would agree with a paradigm, "Incapacitated means unable to consent". This is certainly more to the point and clear than "too drunk to consent". What I am saying,…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 03:25 PM
1

You seem to not understand that "drunk" does not equal "incapacitated". If our paradigm were, "incapacitated, unable to give consent". Okay, I don't think I have a real issue with that. It isn't that. It's, "drunk consent is not consent", which is, of course, nonsense. In this article, Ellie Johnson is arguing that because she was drunk, their encounter was sexual assault. She is using this campaign to humiliate the university, and to put pressure on other universities, to secure more sexual ass…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 02:40 PM
1

Obama eh? No wonder it got around so fast. Well, yes. Hardly "obscure". I hope you are starting to realize the gravity of what I am telling you here. So this is usually how it works. First, a false statistic is used to force the public narrative. This has been part of the Title IX push in universities to secure more sexual assault convictions. This was followed by the "Dear Colleague Letter". From the Washington Post, this letter: issued by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), told all of the more…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 02:04 PM
1

So I ask you one more time, point-blank. Sober person. Drunk person. Obviously drunk, slurring their words, struggling to keep their eyes open, incoherent. They have sex. Rape, yes or no? Again, I would say yes. I've answered that fucking question like six times. You keep avoiding the FUCKING POINT. In this case, she was not incapacitated. So now we ask you point blank. As she was not incapacitated, is it possible she gave her consent? Is the concept "too drunk to consent" or, as worded in this …
/r/MensRights19/07/18 01:51 PM
1

Well, that was a silly response. So did you actually read the article? Lol. Do you understand what it is about? We've been given a very clear example of how "drunk consent is not consent" is a completely nonsensical, illogical way of looking at things. And how there a campaign pushing this blatantly false ideology onto students and the public. But I have a feeling you actually don't care about truth. Do you? You've already admitted to not standing up for your beliefs or questioning even obviousl…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 07:02 AM
1

You sound like you have experience in the field. I appreciate these suggestions and I find them very helpful. Not just for this campaign to be clear. Cheers.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 05:45 AM
1

Lol fuck off I challenge feminists all the time, but when you do that on reddit you generally get snap-banned from the sub. Ah, so you do know there is censorship happening on the internet / Reddit. Are you suggesting we pander to such blatant attempts at intimidation and narrative control, just in order to keep up our own reputation? Don't you think the media already does that? You keep making up this 100%/0% bullshit as if it's true and continue to deny "too drunk to consent" despite also sayi…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 05:42 AM
3

Great idea. I'm sure no one will look at it. Some people will try to protest it and tear it down. Just put them back up again, and make sure people read it.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 05:08 AM
6

First, the statistics should be double checked for accuracy. Just one that was wrong would be a focus point for attack and derailment. What an excellent point. Nothing derails the conversation faster than some nit picking jack ass pointing out it's "only 80%, not 85%!!" It's frustrating. When MRAs post stuff, everyone is suddenly like a Wikipedia clerk carefully fact-checking every last detail. When feminists post blatant falsehoods like "1 in 5 women will be raped by the time they finish colleg…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 05:07 AM
1

If we change the parameters, sure. I have no issue with that. But change the parameters. Don't pander to this "too drunk to consent" horseshit. What I have an issue with: When inebriated, women are 0% responsible for their actions, men are 100% responsible for their actions. I think that's nonsense. Not only because it is extremely unfair to men. Also because it treats women as though they are helpless objects who need protection. It takes responsibility out of their hands. It makes the base ass…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 05:02 AM
1

Well I would agree with that. Maybe we should change the paradigm to: If a conscious person has sex with an unconscious person, only one that person is the rapist.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 12:57 AM
1

Are you saying that consciousness is the determining factor?
/r/MensRights18/07/18 11:56 PM
1

Brock Turner was also twice over the legal limit. Was he also raped?
/r/MensRights18/07/18 11:42 PM
1

Too drunk to consent DOES NOT LACK CLARITY, that is not something I have agreed with. I have stated repeatedly it is necessary and good. Every time we start getting somewhere, you revert back to your bone headed stubborn recalibration of the argument. I'm not even sure if you are aware of it, but it's fucking obnoxious. It's like you steadfastly refuse to understand a point. Of course "too drunk to consent" lacks clarity. You seem to be starting from the same basic flaw as the premise: That wome…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 11:30 PM
1

You're trying to prove Brock acted out of malicious intent. I don't think you've done anything of the sort. But anyway, maybe you are right. Brock Turner isn't the hill I want to die on, nor was it the original point. The original point was the concept "too drunk to consent" lacks logical clarity, a point you have agreed with. Watch those videos I sent you. You need a little more counter point in your life.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:21 PM
1

How does it prove she wasn't?
/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:07 PM
1

She made three phone calls to her boyfriend minutes before the alleged incident. Whether she passed out later is not the issue. It is entirely within the realm of possibility they were engaging in consensual sex when she passed out, and Turner didn't become cogniziant until he was started by the witnesses. In any event, there is evidence, phone calls, 10 minute conversations, to suggest she was in fact conscious right before the event. Maybe you didn't actually read the court transcripts? How ca…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 09:45 PM
1

Unclear? She regained consciousness 3 hours later. Incorrect. She claims to "not remember". Not the same as being "passed out". You're blatantly ignoring evidence to create ambiguity You haven't actually followed this story and you're going with what the media is insisting you believe. You've also turned off your thinking cap.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 09:03 PM
8

This upsets me. With influenceable boys watching no less. Boys who grow up to be men will somehow be "inconvenient". What the fuck is that. Are we "getting on your nerves lately" Obama? Is it because we like to assert fact or logic into our conversations? Is it because we disagree with your disingenuous "1 in 5" debacle? Is it because we pointed out the truth about the "wage gap"? What a terrible, disingenuous, pandering shithead comment to make. If a world leader had said that about women, it w…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 09:01 PM
1

So she wasn't unconscious? The paramedics and doctors lied about the blood and bruising? It is unclear. Seriously man, being drunk isn't an excuse if you rape someone. No. Dammit. It's like you keep deliberately missing the point. The point: Being drunk does not mean you were raped. I understand the "both were drunk" response in some cases but not this one. Well. They were both drunk in this case. My argument isn't that "because he was drunk, doesn't count!". STOP please with that stupid strawma…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 08:40 PM
0

Well, then you haven't read everything. I've read your words. You missed the mark by a wide margin.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 08:26 PM
0

I hope you are doing well. Good luck at the doctor's office. The overall point is university campus tribunals are frankly rigged. The media is complicit in this deception. You've said you're all about the "truth". Well, okay. I respect that. I am as well. This is, btw, the reason people call men's rights the "red pill". Once you start researching the counter arguments, and when you start to actually use logical thinking rather than a cowering, pandering acceptance of the main stream media's blat…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 08:06 PM
1

You are misinformed. https://youtu.be/JN7_pqgK8V0 https://youtu.be/s-9_0TaOZos I haven't made any of those arguments. I'm saying those are the arguments made by feminism. And they are. Well documented. Get informed.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 07:30 PM
0

When inebriated, women are 0% responsible for their actions, men are 100% responsible for their actions. Do you agree with this statement? No, I've made that abundantly clear. So we agree. Why are we arguing then? Lol. Truly, we have a conundrum here. By these parameters, we could argue that Brock Turner was raped. That's not the argument I'm making. To be clear, I have no idea what exactly happened that night. I wasn't there. However, most media and indeed the general population seem to follow …
/r/MensRights18/07/18 04:35 PM
1

"Too drunk to consent" has to be a thing, there is a legal standard for mental capacity. When inebriated, women are 0% responsible for their actions, men are 100% responsible for their actions. Do you agree with this statement? You're more upset with this idea that men and women are held to different standards. Well, yeah. That really is the point, isn't it? We keep getting told we're "equal". So are we suddenly not equal? Again, as I have said numerous times. If there is a mutually consensual d…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 02:55 PM
1

But FFS stop spreading the myth of the myth of the 1 in 5 rapes on campus. The study never said that. Possibly some overexcited politician might have misquoted it at some stage, I could not find an origin. You could not find the origin. Lol. Did you look? That "overexcited" politician's name is Barack Obama. “Right now, nearly one in five women in America has been a victim of rape or attempted rape.” Barack Obama, February 8, 2015. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/02/12/o…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 02:47 PM
25

You just blew my mind. Well done.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 07:00 AM
1

Ok nothing in your comment had anything to do with the part you quoted. My bad. I think the overall point is, "too drunk to consent" makes no logical sense. It makes the base assumption: When inebriated, a woman is never responsible for her actions while a man is 100% responsible for his. It is an impossible paradox. Your idea about determining levels of intoxication seems fine. But it is completely unprovable. As such, I don't see how this can be of any help.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 06:42 AM
1

This is total nonsense. If you would care to back that up. Show the Lisak study, and show the "hit piece".
/r/MensRights18/07/18 05:00 AM
1

Why did you quote part of my post and then respond to something completely different? It was responding to your comment? And what's your source on Brock Turner being blackout drunk? Any source about the story talks about both of them being drunk. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brock-turner-drinking-party-culture_us_5758259be4b0e39a28ac015c
/r/MensRights18/07/18 04:56 AM
1

I invite you to do some more research into the subject.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 12:03 AM
1

honestly I hope more states and countries change their definition of rape to make it work both ways (remove "penetration" from the definition). If they change "too drunk to consent", then literally every single drunken college hookup could be considered "rape". I'm imagining scenarios where both parties have drunken sex, then rush to the Title IX office to get their claims in first. It's a ridiculous definition if you actually stop to think about it. By this definition, Brock Turner actually was…
/r/MensRights17/07/18 11:50 PM
14

"Too drunk to consent" is asinine. By that definition, are women not regularly guilty of raping men? Is it possible for two people to rape each other? I'm sure that mutually inebriated hookups never happen in college or university. Yeah, that never happens.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 04:07 PM
1

There has been bickering over the statistics since at least the 1980s or whenever it was when NCVS got revised because its methodology was shown to severely undercount rapes. More feminist shell games. Define "rape". The definition has changed so many times over the years. The real definition is "forcible penetration". It has, however, changed over the years. Andrea Dworkin has argued that "all heterosexual sex is rape", which is obviously nonsense. This is one of the top "experts" in the field,…
/r/MensRights17/07/18 02:41 PM
1

You've confused "false accusation" with "false conviction". Nope, I just checked. Right. And I've just explained how this is a feminist shell game. That was literally my very first point. "Define false accusation". Feminist theory seems to only count "false conviction" as a "false accusation". That is, in fact, what you are arguing. Not the same thing. You've fallen flat on your face. The rest of your argument is completely illogical as you have incorrectly misidentified the parameters.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 02:25 PM
2

You've confused "false accusation" with "false conviction". Your entire argument falls completely flat on its face after that. This is the shell game feminism uses to use "statistics" as a bully tactic. They have attempted to change the definition of "false accusation" to mean "only false convictions". This, of course, is being completely dishonest. If false convictions are between 2-8%, that is already way too high. But we're talking about false accusations here. And by your own logic gleaned f…
/r/MensRights17/07/18 05:43 AM
1

In your "extensive" experience? The stats are wrong about false accusations. That will be clearly shown over time. I will expect an apology at that point.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 05:35 AM
1

Again, is "rape" not considered "sexual assault"? As a general principle if you are looking at figures provided by well-established professional experts in the field, with statistical expertise provided by specialist statisticians before publication, and you see something that doesn't make sense, then the chances are not good that you have discovered a flaw in their reasoning. More likely you just don't understand what you are looking at. That's not true at all. As you get older and start examin…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 02:03 PM
2

Right. Obviously some cases are non-convictions because of lack of evidence. Not all of them of course. Another reason for a non-conviction is a false accusation. By definition. Feminist theory is hiding false accusations by miscounting them as non-convictions.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 01:49 PM
3

That's true. That's a good point. In that way, pornography is a facilitator or an enhancer. This is not unlike tampons in that regard. I think many women who are in the sex industry understand this, and are getting paid for it.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 12:03 PM
8

The constraints for the real rate agreed by most experts in the field are 2% and 8% or 10%. Most "experts in the field" are feminists pushing a narrative, and who base this blatant and demonstrably false statistics on David Lisak's debunked 2010 study. Secondly, define "false accusation". This is part of the very problem with the entire debate. In the Rainn.org "994 of 1,000 assailants walk free" statistic, how could any of those not be false accusations? By definition, a non-conviction would be…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 04:09 AM
5

Your supposed inconsistency comes from mixing up numbers for sexual assaults with those for rape. Are rapes not classified as sexual assaults? Your conflation of non conviction with false accusation finds support on only on the lunatic fringe of the MRM. I don't think you will find many other people prepared to even discuss that with you. And yet, here you are. 2% - 8% is not David Lisak's own figure, it is the extreme limits to the range for the true false accusation rate accepted by most resea…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 03:56 AM
3

A. Trudeau is a clown. B. I don't agree with the premise that pornography is tantamount to "sexual abuse". One might even make the argument that pornography prevents many men from harassing women in real life. Prostitution is the oldest profession for a reason. It will always exist. As long as somebody is willing to pay for it, and as long as somebody else is willing to do it for money, it will exist. Is the porno industry perfect? Probably far from it. I'm sure there are many nefarious aspects …
/r/MensRights15/07/18 03:47 AM
10

This false statistic comes to us from Northeastern University researcher David Lisak in 2010. Of the 136 sexual assault cases studied over a 10 year period, it was determined that 5.9% were "false accusations". The margin of error was corrected to "2-8%". Which in feminist language equals "less than 2%". Read the book The Campus Rape Frenzy: The Attack on Due Process at America's Universities for a scathing take down of this egregiously misleading "statistic". The stat doesn't even make sense gi…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 02:19 AM
3

The court found a "discernible pattern, according to which [Zechner] was treated more favourably than the other candidates from the beginning," I think this is why so many women fall for the myth of "the patriarchy". Women do indeed exhibit a gender bias. They believe men function on the same parameters. We do not.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 01:48 AM
9

Seriously though. This is a false accusation. Now, here is where we can observe the nefarious nature of statistics. This won't be counted as a "false accusation". This will be counted as a "non conviction". Feminist groups will take this misleading statistic and wave it in our face like a weapon. Don't forget the narrative everyone! "False accusations never happen." Yeah, right.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:37 PM
5

But but... I thought false accusations never happened!
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:35 PM
3

Here's another point. Most of these men are married and have children. They are supporting women (their wife), and (possibly) female children. Who would you rather be? Obama? Or Obama's wife? Obama has the endless stress, the 100 hour work weeks, the scrutiny, the responsibility. Obama's wife (and children) get the benefits of this labour. But with not nearly the amount of effort. That isn't to say Michelle Obama does nothing. She's actually quite active. But if you look at CEOs, most of whom ar…
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:12 PM
7

Of course. Prime Minister Trudeau is a great example of this deception. He's a male. He's white. Does he advocate for men's rights? Absolutely not. He's exactly the opposite. So this is the dream for Big Feminism. They have in government a champion for exclusively women's rights (at the detriment of men's rights), but they can count him in the column of "men" maintaining the illusion of the "Patriarchy". Having your cake and eating it too.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 04:56 PM
1

Good bot.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 04:41 PM
3

Right. For a complete breakdown of deaths, military, famine, disease, POWs, Holocaust victims, strategic bombings, etc etc, here is a link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties?wprov=sfla1 Military deaths estimated between 21-25 million according to Wikipedia. That's probably 98-99% male.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 04:40 PM
7

And climate change too!! Climate change disproportionately affects women!! Aaahhh!! Poor women! We should set up programs and funding for groups who will give us fluffy and happy that match our narrative! Diversity! Yay!
/r/MensRights13/07/18 04:05 PM
25

When the subject of historical male privilege comes up, I mention the war. 60At least 24 million men died military deaths in WWII alone. How many other wars have we had? Is it "male privilege" to die face down in the muck with machine guns firing all around you and rats eating at your legs? "Male privilege" included dying in war, which was essentially hell. Dying in hell is not a privilege. The women I say this to completely ignore everything I just said. "Yeah, well if women were in charge, the…
/r/MensRights13/07/18 03:18 PM
3

Hehe. It is comical! It's like how every time anyone talks about the new Star Wars Movie they have to start with, "Well visually it was stunning, but..." Lol. We're all so afraid we're just saying things by rote.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 12:58 AM
5

Yes, I agree. Actually, I wasn't trying to comment on you making that disclaimer. I make it all the time as well. I think we all do it. It just seems sometimes like we have to say it.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 12:28 AM
5

Of course she is. We often see journalists, academics, politicians, and lawyers who have all been sympathetic to MeToo in the past getting promotions today. Even when they withheld or exaggerated the truth. Especially when they withheld or exaggerated the truth.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 12:26 AM
5

I mean... Why wouldn't they have been exposed anyway? Who are we even talking about? Anyway, maybe you're right in the long run.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 12:20 AM
1

The Twitter Mob to the rescue again! Goodness. It's getting beyond obnoxious. I keep thinking there's nothing possible else left to get outraged at.... And then they surprise me yet again and descend another level.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 12:11 AM
1

Fuck Google. Hoisted on their own petard.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 12:03 AM
4

Male feminists are invariably perverts and rapists, trying to use their virtue signalling to cover up for past bad behaviour. This.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 12:01 AM
4

So what happens to Monica Bryne who misreported the story to the public?
/r/MensRights12/07/18 11:52 PM
9

Nothing good comes out of witch hunt my friend.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 11:21 PM
20

I think a lot of good has come from the metoo movement. It was long overdue and exposed a lot of the bad men out there. I feel like every time someone has something critical to say about #MeToo, they have to start with this sentence. It's like a knee jerk disclaimer before you speak the truth.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 10:28 PM
5

Time to bring in the Twitter Mob of Justice!!
/r/MensRights12/07/18 10:25 PM
3

"We need more women in STEM!" "How about more men in teaching?" "You're a misogynist!!"
/r/MensRights12/07/18 10:21 PM
1

Related but not related. According to the book I'm reading "The Campus Rape Frenzy", self reports of sexual harassment and/or rape rise proportionately with the status of the school. Ivy League Schools have the highest self-reporting incidences in the country. This is despite the number of actual confirmed cases of sexual harassment and/or rape being in line or lower with national standards. In other words, expensive colleges tend to push the "women are oppressed" narrative. In turn, they experi…
/r/MensRights12/07/18 03:15 PM
26

Here is my comment about this from another thread: This is the #1 attack I get. What have you got to hide? Maybe you're really a rapist. You must really hate women. So ridiculous. The answer is a firm "no", followed by "fuck off", for the record. I really have a problem with this type of rhetorical attack. First of all, it isn't addressing the point. At all. It's a dead cat maneuver - they don't know how to answer, so they throw a dead cat on the table. The second thing is, it's way wrong. Actua…
/r/MensRights12/07/18 02:49 PM
6

This is the #1 attack I get. What have you got to hide? Maybe you're really a rapist. You must really hate women. So ridiculous. The answer is a firm "no", followed by "fuck off", for the record. I really have a problem with this type of rhetorical attack. First of all, it isn't addressing the point. At all. It's a dead cat maneuver - they don't know how to answer, so they throw a dead cat on the table. The second thing is, it's way wrong. Actually, I care very much about women. That's why I car…
/r/MensRights12/07/18 05:48 AM
1

Hell yes. This is the first honest article I've heard in a long time. This. She is right. Read this article.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 09:11 PM
1

This is really when the story will hit the fan. And you know it's going to happen, right?
/r/MensRights10/07/18 04:43 AM
1

Where are all feminists and government employees lecturing us about how "we need more men in psychology?"
/r/MensRights03/07/18 04:19 PM
1

That is fantastic. Thank you for sharing.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 04:17 PM
3

Omg. He could have died.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 01:34 PM
1

This is a fantastic question. Thank you for asking. I feel like it is a combination of factors of which the feminization of education is one. Less father time, lifestyle, nutrition, are all factors. The influence of the pharmaceutical industry. Americans take the most medication in the world by far. The pharmaceutical industry is not interested in changing this. In "The War On Boys" by Christina Hoff Sommers she talks about how boys learn differently from girls. Girls like to follow instructions…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 07:12 AM
0

Mic drop.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 02:00 PM
1

PS - Fuck yoga.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 06:38 AM
2

Checking the person out, turns out she is a HS junior and her Twitter feed is littered with the N word, RTs of people talking about doing meth, other drug use and some making fun of white people. Also generic political posts and RTs. What? Who is this person? That sound awful. It exceptionally irritates me when women claim they know the "real" masculinity. Like, how dare they. Can you imagine men told women we knew more about feminity? A once had a feminist friend who was a teacher. I expressed …
/r/MensRights22/06/18 06:38 AM
4

That was a cool article. Now regularly attributed to Voltaire, this saying seems to originate with something written in 1993 by Kevin Alfred Strom, an American neo-Nazi Holocaust denier, and not a man who obviously exudes Voltairean wit and irony. But once you become an authority, it seems, all sides have a claim on you. A neo-Nazi Holocaust denier. Fascinating stuff. Obviously if that were common knowledge, people would dissociate themselves from that quote. In order to give it the credibility …
/r/MensRights22/06/18 06:22 AM
1

This was phenomenally written. Bravo. Great question.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 06:12 AM
11

Then someone says, "why are you so angry?" To which I say, "I'm not." "Well you sound angry." "You sounded angry two minutes ago when I pointed out the double standard." "YOU WOULD BE ANGRY TOO IF YOUR PEOPLE HAD BEEN OPPRESSED FOR CENTURIES!" That's a pretty typical conversation.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:11 PM
6

Exactly.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 02:13 PM
3

This Tumblr may contain sensitive media. What should I do here? Is Tumblr censoring us now too? Sensitive media? Like, you mean people might get triggered by stats?
/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:13 PM
20

There's no way to "prove" her wrong. It's the old adage feminists used on us for years: Privilege is invisible to those who have it. If I were you, I would just tell her you disagree. State your points. There are some advantages, there are some disadvantages. If you really want to push the issue, why don't you suggest watching the Red Pill as a family? (I have no idea how that would go. Just a suggestion.) Good luck.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:04 PM
3

This article is dripping with bullshit. This seems to be the new media strategy. Since they can't ignore us, they have decided to hijack the movement and replace it with men who do not represent us. Then, the good old reference to Paul Elam. The quintessential misrepresention of his point. It has to be in every single article we read about the men's rights movement these days. Never mind when feminists say terrible things. "All men are rapists and should be put in prison and shot." Never mind th…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 06:18 PM
24

Give a wide berth. What, are we like boats now? What kind of nonsense is this? Really?
/r/MensRights20/06/18 02:39 PM
6

I disagree with you here. This is a question of justice. Not anyone's personal feelings.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 03:21 AM
23

It's hard to understand the power of a woman's word. She whispered something in the darkened attic of the internet; next thing you know the guy's life is completely ruined. Now she's going to "take a break from the internet" for a while. Great timing there. Thank you for being there for explanation for this strong accusation. /s It's like women don't even have to try anymore. They don't even have to try. She says she feels "uncomfortable", and you're in the slammer. She says "you sexually abused…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 03:19 AM
3

"posed nude to raise questions about the depiction of women and challenge the association between the ​female body and sex." She posed nude to raise questions about the depiction of nude women? Well that worked. I have questions. Why did you feel you needed to pose nude to accomplish that?
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:33 AM
13

This can't be real. I just really hope that isn't real.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:09 PM
8

This is some serious Orwellian Nonsense.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:07 PM
13

Home run. What a fantastic article.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:15 AM
1

Women's studies professors aren't loud enough?
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:43 PM
8

I hate them more everyday.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 02:09 PM
11

Can I just say? I hate these"fact-checking" websites. It's like now that something goes against their narrative, they suddenly get all pedantic about the "facts". As if they ever cared about the facts. The Wage Gap myth has been pedaled on us forcefully by media, academia, our government for years; where were these "fact-checking" sites at that time? Fact-checking seems like a great idea. But it is has become a nefarious practice. What we decide to focus on, and how we choose to determine "facts…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 04:45 AM
1

Google has become that which it sought to eradicate: Evil.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 02:05 AM
19

You've gotta be kidding me. Edit: I can't believe this happened. This is overt sexism. That teacher should be reprimanded.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 01:53 AM
12

There isn't even an allegation here. Now all it takes is the mere mention of "controlling behaviour" and "sexual assault" (what sexual assault?) to have a male removed from his successful role. Like she was just waiting for him to finally get his big break before taking him down a notch. So what's the allegation? Let's hear it. Stop hiding behind cryptic, "progressive", bullshit language. Let's hear it. Another common theme. She cheated on him. She's accusing him of something to cover up the gui…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 12:29 AM
2

So why are we allowing women’s studies professors to be thought leaders in what makes men?
/r/MensRights17/06/18 12:20 AM
2

It's a mind fuck for sure, the day you take the Red Pill. Thank you for sharing. It really means a lot to us.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 12:16 AM
0

Interesting. Those weren't the results I got. https://www.google.ca/search?q=men+are+more+likely+to+be+convicted+than+women&oq=men+are+&aqs=chrome.0.69i59l2j69i57j69i59j69i60l2.4266j0j4&client=ms-android-samsung-ss&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
/r/MensRights16/06/18 12:45 AM
1

Yes, me too. Try that on Google..
/r/MensRights15/06/18 11:32 PM
6

He answered in one syllable monotones. The horror...
/r/MensRights15/06/18 11:16 PM
3

Mental gymnastics.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:28 PM
3

Well, i don't know. I'd rather have the possibility of choosing the representative who best fits my own views and will therefore not enter a war which I wouldn't support myself and as such have all my rights as well as possibly avoiding the war altogether. Then you could have been a conscientious objector, and not had the right to vote. EDIT: For the people downvoting me, I'm interested in your reasons for preferring not to have the right to vote. It might be because I come from a different coun…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 03:34 AM
5

So are you arguing that you believe women should have to sign up for the draft? ... And many men. You forgot about that part. That's the part that has been conveniently edited out of history. Yes, men who weren't considered to be "citizens" (usually because they owned no land). Many men were also not allowed to vote at those times, but with different restrictions than those women had - and restrictions that were lifted earlier in history. Right. Because they signed up to fight in a war and proba…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 09:11 PM
14

You missed the point. While I agree with the sentiment, stating that they weren't oppressed is actually ridiculous. I didn't say women weren't oppressed. I said everyone was oppressed in those days. What would you rather? A. Not have the right to vote? B. Be in a trench while machine guns are thundering killing every single person around you? It is not a question of 'choice'. This is a terrible argument. I've encountered it before. A. It wasn't a choice for most of the boys going. B. It's a rhet…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 06:04 PM
2

Ack. I'm annoyed they "ate" got autocorrected to "are" there. Dammit!
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:06 PM
3

Well said.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:05 PM
12

I love this argument. I pulled this out the other day, and the other person didn't even understand it. Which I guess shows you what we're dealing with here. That was frustrating. But it's still a rock solid argument.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:04 PM
1

You sound like you'd be a hit at parties.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:42 PM
143

This "fact" has been used as a bludgeon for decades now. "Women were oppressed in the past. Now we need a correction." (First of all, even if women really had been oppressed in the past, that isn't a logical reason for a "correction" today.) "Everyone was oppressed in that era. Even men. Men had to go to war." "WOMEN DIDN'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE!" Always thrown down like a mic drop. It cannot be successfully argued during a dinner conversation. I've presented the historical facts to people nume…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:42 PM
1

For some reason, I know you're talking about UPS. Lol. And gee. Sorry for defending you there. Why don't you just try to make enemies with everyone?
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:03 PM
19

A. The combined IQs of the people on that show was like 12. B. Can you imagine. Can you imagine a male host, calling up male candidates, from an all male audience, asking questions to sexily clad females, who look like morons for not knowing what Albert Einstein's first name was? "What do you do Kendra?" "I work with children." Imagine a guy up there saying that into the microphone while an audience of all males cheered into a frenzy big breasted sexy blondes they called "babes". "Bring out the …
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:58 PM
8

Good. Fuck them.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:46 PM
3

Wow. Interesting article. Is this real? It reads like an off colour detective novel.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:41 PM
4

What is good or bad for boys does not seem to attract the interest of our cultural elites This is the part that fascinates me. There is a massive amount of untapped political power here. The first politician who rallies boys and men in this country will galvanize a deep grassroots voting force. Boys and men are thirsting right now for leadership. We've seen Trump's victory. We've seen Jordan Peterson's meteoric rise. Warren Farrell is a superstar. Our sub and pro MRA comments get massively upvot…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:59 AM
2

I actually sympathize with you here. Most people who aren't business owners don't get this. Try not to take it out on the employees. They don't have the same level of skin in the game as you do. Always speak to a manager. Always try to get them to see your side. Explain your problems calmly.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:50 AM
1

We need more women in cycling! #Equality
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:35 PM
3

This is why we need to abolish Gender Studies.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 07:37 PM
1

Good for you. You are exhibiting individual rational reasoning. That's where a great many of us are. And yet, it seems to fly in the face of everything we see or hear in the media and in the mainstream. This is why we call it, "The Red Pill".
/r/MensRights11/06/18 06:54 PM
3

"Self-Made Man" by Norah Vincent is an interesting read (I wish she had done more though). "The Boy Crisis" by Warren Farrell. It goes very heavily into the parenting of males. "No More Mr. Nice Guy" by Robert Glover really changed my life. A fantastic read.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 05:49 PM
4

I'm not exactly sure if I understood correctly. Are you saying that boys more than girls are diagnosed with ADHD/ASD like symptoms? Well yeah. Of course. That's been a thing for a long time. Something like 1 in 7 boys is on Ritalin in the States. ASD affects boys disproportionately to girls. It's a major problem. Major problem. When these boys become men, we're going to have a serious societal issue. I have plenty of theories about why it disproportionately affects boys. But to be perfectly hone…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 05:45 PM
11

I cannot upvote this comment enough.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:45 PM
4

Yeah, but guys. Feminism is all about "#Equality"! /s
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:44 PM
1

That was a whataboutism. We're talking about "diversity". Here and now. White males are currently underrepresented in university. Why don't we hear about when we speak of "diversity initiatives"?
/r/MensRights05/06/18 07:49 PM
2

Sure. And as you've pointed out, white men as a group are underrepresented in universities. Why aren't we hearing about that in diversity initiatives?
/r/MensRights05/06/18 06:47 PM
2

it's irrelevant to promoting diversity in higher education. How is it irrelevant? White boys are a demographic. Are we saying that diversity is diversity, but only for some? Some are more diverse than others?
/r/MensRights05/06/18 06:36 PM
3

Not logically. But don't worry. There will be a way for feminism to "fix" this. In this Cornell study, women were preferred 2:1 over men for STEM faculty positions Here's the problem. There are calls for "diversity". As you've pointed out, white females dominate the campus. So if we're looking for "diversity", why aren't we talking about that? Why don't we see "diversity" in academic enrollment? If we are seeking "diversity", we should have more boys in academia. Right? Yet, we never, ever hear …
/r/MensRights05/06/18 06:04 PM
7

Diversity = "Not white men". Had you not heard that before?
/r/MensRights05/06/18 04:57 PM
5

Because it's discrimination against men?
/r/MensRights05/06/18 04:22 PM
8

Big Feminism. It's a business.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 04:21 PM
1

"...So you're saying that..." Cathy Newman style argument approach. It's a typical way the modern "progressives" make their arguments. It's a combination of deliberate misrepresention and intimidation. Misrepresentation, because they know that's not what you just said, and they are trying to frame you negatively to the room. Intimation, because through this venue, hopefully you will become quiet and not oppose their viewpoint.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 08:53 PM
1

So?
/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:33 AM
3

Starting with the "right to sex" heading. No where does Peterson advocate a "right to sex". Also, "Enforced monogamy" does not equate to, "the state should intervene in some manner to ensure men like Minassian are guaranteed to have a partner." That's a complete misrepresention of his point, which is that our current encouragement of promiscuous relationships is damaging to male female relationships. Encouraging traditional monogamy is better than males' disengagement from society (incel).
/r/MensRights03/06/18 05:41 PM
1

Well, he has several different points really. What point exactly are you asking about?
/r/MensRights03/06/18 02:26 PM
2

By far the best post I've read today. Well done.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 05:03 AM
3

Yet another bullshit deliberate misrepresention of what Peterson actually said. Fucking pathetic cowards. Can't debate his point, can't understand it - move to character assassination. On a happier note: Have you guys read "No More Mr. Nice Guy" by Robert Glover? It is a fantastic book.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:59 AM
11

Repent, abase yourself, and be an obedient feminist ally — and we still won’t trust you. That is exactly what it feels like.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:52 AM
2

Nah. It's gotta be the patriarchy. /s
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:39 AM
1

Nice. :)
/r/MensRights01/06/18 02:42 PM
2

Oh, I see what you mean. I meant that right now, the main narrative is that men and women are "equal", as in "the same". Whereas in Japan, it's more than they are equal, but different. If you get what I'm saying...
/r/MensRights01/06/18 02:34 PM
1

I'm not sure what you are trying to say here.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 01:27 PM
4

I understand what you are saying about Japanese society. But I also think things are more complicated than they seem. True relationships are dying in Japan. The culture of loneliness, in Tokyo especially, is over-whelming. It's like a thick, heavy veil hanging over everything. This isn't only attributed to "traditional society". This has so much to do with over work, everything is zangyou (over work). And when you're not in work, you're on the train going to or from work. It's a crushing society…
/r/MensRights01/06/18 12:27 PM
0

But don't demonize every women out there. Or make everything a gender problem. Because this is exactly what the feminists do right now. I think you just answered your own question.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 11:40 AM
5

So, when I say I don’t want to work anymore, I mean I don’t want to work full time in paid employment, but I still want to work – and work hard – at raising my children. And I shouldn’t be penalised for that. I want to eat ice cream all day, and not get fat. Or, if I do get fat, I don't want to be shamed for it. I shouldn't be penalized for wanting to eat ice cream all day.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 03:59 PM
12

"Someone sounds hurt." What a great reply.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 06:17 AM
35

TL:DR - even pro-feminists get banned from /r/feminism for simply listening to a Men’s Rights group nowadays??! ROFL!! This post was perfect! You just made my day. "I'm going to give it my best to listen to the feminist point of view. So basically, I believe that... Hey wait, I got banned!? What the hell!?!?" Lol. Welcome to the club bro. You just got some insight into feminism.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:16 PM
20

You poor guy. This is exactly why we need men's rights. Your situation is the one we are fighting for. If you want the truth, you were a statistic. All that, "only 2% of all sexual assault trials end in convictions" rhetoric that gets thrown around by feminists has leaked into our legal system. Of course, "only 2%" means... The patriarchy! Right? I once asked a feminist about this stat. I suggested that within that 98%, there were maybe some false accusations. That's why, you know, they ended in…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 04:22 AM
1

Given this whole thing has come from an investigation by CNN staff, I think that's part of the problem. The media has an implicit bias to create drama, and hence sell proverbial newspapers.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 03:36 AM
3

Now see, if I were a feminist right now, I would loudly decry this one. A false accusation derails their entire narrative of #BelieveTheVictim. Feminists scream at people to, "just believe!!", but then present cases like this. It doesn't help their integrity. Not at all. That's for sure.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:35 PM
83

Man gets fired from job for making a bad joke after one female complains to management that she felt "uncomfortable". Who runs society again? The patriarchy?
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:31 PM
3

first of all they are not from 18 women. Some women claimed they had directly experienced sexual harassment and others had claimed they witnessed this behaviour. This is the angle I'm especially interested in. If "18" isn't 18, then what is it? I remember the Jian Ghomeshi Hoax. "23" was the big number. I went through every single one of those claims (that were available, because most were only claimed, not published). There was only one incident that really jumped out. The rest were either comp…
/r/MensRights27/05/18 04:50 PM
6

This is completely absurd. We can see the end game goal here. Erase student debt for women. This is because a great deal of the people writing about these subjects in the media are (or have friends) women with student debt. Completely ignoring the advantages gained in society by having a degree. An advantage that, incidentally, probably got them their job. They probably wouldn't be where they are if they hadn't taken the student loans that they did. Which was part of the deal. Which they knew wh…
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:10 AM
7

Crunch the numbers, and arrive at this stunner of a statistic: Women hold two thirds of the $1.4 trillion in student loans in the United States. Was it not their choice to get a loan?
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:02 AM
17

That sounds like an awful conundrum you've found yourself in here. You can disagree, and risk the ire of your kin; or you can agree, become subservient, and it still won't be good enough, because your primal sin is that you are a man. You cannot win.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 05:59 AM
151

Morgan Freeman. Is there nothing left that is sacred. There isn't a single example of an allegation here. Just "18 women" and... What? What did they say exactly? Did he force them to watch him masturbate? Or did he say, "hello" to them? This has now moved into the realm of the absurd. A parody of an as-yet undefined ethical indiscretion. "Denies allegations" Denies allegations of what? Ironically, the very thing feminists fear: That people do not immediately #BelieveTheVictims, is further entren…
/r/MensRights27/05/18 05:56 AM
2

This was obviously written by someone very immature. I would guess a 16-year-old. She's simply repeating what she thinks is "correct". This is what school is doing to our teenagers.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 05:41 AM
1

He's our hero.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:43 AM
12

How many dates has she gone on with men who talk about Rick and Morty? Like two? At what point does this complaint even become relevant? How dare somebody talks about a TV show on a date! Oh the humanity! Keeping the conversation light and easily accessible! Those horrible, evil, condescending brooding men who sit around and discuss TV shows! And that's not all! Talking about a TV show is an example of sexism! Yes! That's right. Micro aggressions! And abs... Wait for it... Mansplaining!! That's …
/r/MensRights24/05/18 05:32 AM
7

Why is this person allowed to write anything again ever? This was easily the most asinine article I've ever read. Vice Media continues its decent into disingenuous intellectually dishonest pandering propagandist hell by giving agency to pathetically untalented and narrow-minded writers like this. What an absolute joke of a publication.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 05:12 AM
18

Women make up "just 56% of American college students." Only 56 percent. Merely 56 percent. They're still disadvantaged because that's not nearly enough, it really ought to be 75% or 90%. Only then will it start to look fair. Notice they didn't use university statistics, in which women are well over the 60% territory.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 05:04 AM
4

This comment needs to be pushed to the top.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 05:02 AM
20

We're going to start seeing protest marches lobbying the government to eliminate interest on student debt and/or eliminate student debt all together. We're already seeing it in Canada. It's coming to the States too. It's a top-down initiative. Like so many of these other causes. "Let's eliminate 'sexist' student debt! Yay!!" It's fucking absurd.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 05:01 AM
3

This is honestly one of the dumbest articles I've ever read. Don't even waste your time. It's about someone who got upset when someone else tried to help her with some tools to fix her bike. Like, how dare you try to help out. You evil man!! The world is going insane I tell you.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 04:39 AM
3

Did Dylan say she didn't believe her brother? What happened to #BelieveTheVictim??
/r/MensRights23/05/18 10:23 PM
1

What a phenomenal read. Is that an excerpt from his book, "Is there anything good about men?"
/r/MensRights23/05/18 04:27 PM
12

Holy shit. That story is dark. She threatened to tell everyone at the party that he had raped her. My God. I'd rather let the woman rape me than be faced with that. I guess he did too. What a fucking terrifying prospect.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 04:11 PM
2

That being said, I do recall that boys were definitely given more shit by teachers, especially female teachers, for just being boys. When I came out as gay in Grade 11 the teachers were actually a lot nicer to me. Thank you! This is the part that is interesting to me. You're a guy. You've experienced discipline, especially from female teachers, just for being a boy. Yet, when you come out as gay, that changes. Why is that? You're not any less of a boy, or a man. You're exactly the same person. W…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 05:39 AM
2

I agree. In fact, I was considering that maybe she was trying to butter me up or something. However, this was someone I had never met, and we had not had a political conservation in the least. She was the one who offered that information, and I never let it known that I was particularly interested in men's rights. So... I don't know. As you said, I've long suspected this to be true as well. This was the first time I had ever heard a woman (not an mra) admit this. Take it for what it's worth.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:16 PM
4

Erin Pizzey. Yes. It's been happening for decades now.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 05:13 PM
3

Oh yeah, no complaint against her here. Actually, I'm quite pleased she admitted this to me.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 05:09 PM
3

Interesting. I have a question. Did you feel that you were ever discriminated against by your teachers at high school? I think this is a common one for guys. It is for me. My teachers definitely targeted and disciplined me. I believe much of that came because I was a male. Usually from female teachers seeing me as a threat or a disruption. I'm wondering if female teachers treated you the same way as the other guys? Or did they treat you differently because you were gay? It might be a hard questi…
/r/MensRights17/05/18 01:25 PM
7

Yeah, I don't think this is real...
/r/MensRights17/05/18 01:13 PM
6

Done. When can we see the results?
/r/MensRights17/05/18 01:12 PM
2

Hey, that was an excellent video man. When and where is your discussion panel being held?
/r/MensRights17/05/18 01:05 PM
3

I read that the other day. We really are living in 1984.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:23 PM
6

Good for her.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:11 PM
2

This is an incredible story. I'm very happy that this came to light. We've known that this is a thing for a while now. Accusations of sexual impropriety are used like a weapon. Hopefully now Canadians will see the impossible double standard that has become a paradigm in this country. Too many lives have been ruined.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 01:42 PM
3

We need more female electricians!!
/r/MensRights07/05/18 10:22 PM
1

This is correct.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 02:33 PM
6

How about the stance against affirmative action and "diversity" quotas?
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:38 AM
3

You're, "probably racist too." That pretty much sums it up. Lol
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:15 AM
1

I hear that all the time in my discussions. My mother said that to me just the other day.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:29 PM
1

... Forcing women into heterogeneous relationships. Wow. What an absolutely fascinating opinion. So... Heterogeneous relationships are now the fault of "the patriarchy"?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 03:03 PM
1

The "Unexamined" brutality? You are examining it right now. By definition.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 02:45 PM
2

Lol. Tell me about it. I've been getting battered on another subject here all day.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:53 PM
7

Is the patriarchy the reason there are more scholarships available to women than to men?
/r/MensRights01/05/18 03:29 PM
1

I agree. The problem is it was my mother who said that. And I'm certainly not prepared to say that to her.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 03:16 PM
1

Well that was my question. I wrote a post about that. It's part of the narrative that really holds no water imho. But it's a tricky conversation to have over a dinner table.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 02:30 PM
7

But that's racist, isn't it?
/r/MensRights01/05/18 02:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter