TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

M4Strings Archive

View 54 posts and 664 comments by M4Strings on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
779

Social IssuesM4Strings/r/MensRights23/02/16 08:24 PM
659

M4Strings/r/MensRights05/10/14 03:47 AM
551

M4Strings/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:54 AM
399

GeneralM4Strings/r/MensRights13/09/20 10:04 AM
221

Social IssuesM4Strings/r/MensRights14/10/15 02:30 PM
184

[Misleading Title]M4Strings/r/MensRights09/12/13 01:39 PM
130

M4Strings/r/MensRights07/11/13 05:34 PM
114

M4Strings/r/MensRights18/11/14 03:28 PM
108

M4Strings/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:39 PM
102

M4Strings/r/MensRights05/04/14 01:30 PM
97

Edu./Occu.M4Strings/r/MensRights15/01/16 10:17 PM
81

M4Strings/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:43 PM
75

M4Strings/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:31 AM
73

M4Strings/r/MensRights14/11/14 01:03 PM
72

M4Strings/r/MensRights11/10/14 06:58 PM
65

RagebaitM4Strings/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:32 PM
49

M4Strings/r/MensRights12/01/14 05:14 PM
48

M4Strings/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:51 PM
45

WBBM4Strings/r/MensRights07/01/15 01:33 PM
43

M4Strings/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:00 PM
43

M4Strings/r/MensRights28/10/13 02:42 AM
43

Anti-MRAM4Strings/r/MensRights04/12/14 10:28 AM
39

M4Strings/r/MensRights21/08/14 07:19 PM
37

Rec. OutrageM4Strings/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:11 PM
35

M4Strings/r/MensRights04/01/14 02:23 AM
34

M4Strings/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:37 PM
30

Blogs/VideoM4Strings/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:01 AM
27

M4Strings/r/MensRights22/10/14 01:56 PM
26

M4Strings/r/MensRights26/03/14 02:25 AM
26

MR Blogs/VlogsM4Strings/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:21 PM
24

M4Strings/r/MensRights03/06/14 12:57 AM
24

M4Strings/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:56 PM
24

NewsM4Strings/r/MensRights11/10/14 07:12 PM
23

M4Strings/r/MensRights07/01/14 04:50 PM
21

M4Strings/r/MensRights24/12/13 12:08 AM
20

FeminismM4Strings/r/MensRights22/11/15 03:52 PM
20

M4Strings/r/MensRights23/10/14 08:37 PM
16

M4Strings/r/MensRights11/02/14 03:10 PM
14

Blogs/VideoM4Strings/r/MensRights22/06/14 10:22 PM
11

M4Strings/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:45 PM
11

M4Strings/r/MensRights09/11/14 12:03 AM
10

M4Strings/r/MensRights17/01/14 05:35 AM
9

M4Strings/r/MensRights30/12/13 06:43 PM
9

M4Strings/r/MensRights25/02/14 12:10 AM
8

Blogs/VideoM4Strings/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:48 PM
3

M4Strings/r/MensRights06/11/13 11:34 PM
1

re: FeminismM4Strings/r/MensRights24/07/14 09:46 PM
0

M4Strings/r/MensRights05/08/13 10:12 PM
0

Blogs/VideoM4Strings/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:22 AM
0

M4Strings/r/MensRights27/03/14 11:39 PM
0

M4Strings/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:33 PM
0

M4Strings/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:50 PM
0

Blogs/VideoM4Strings/r/MensRights25/11/14 12:01 AM
0

M4Strings/r/MensRights09/11/14 01:53 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

You should want you kids to lose their mom, because their mom is a manipulative, abusive psycho.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 11:18 AM
15

Ha, got banned for commenting "Imagine being salty that other people don't like being judged or denied things based on their skin or genitals."
/r/MensRights04/07/21 11:17 AM
28

To feminists, anything that negatively effects women in any perceived way is the fault of men and the patriarchy, even if it's something they themselves fought for. Best example of this is the Tender Years Doctrine and how it's gone on to influence child custody cases against men. Feminists fought for it, arguing that children are better left in the care of their mothers during their "tender years" in cases of divorce. Now, the idea that women are naturally better caregivers is a misogynistic no…
/r/MensRights02/07/21 12:45 PM
2

See, this is where we disagree. I have broken down for you exactly what gender is. Just because it's mostly a state of emotional being doesn't mean it doesn't exist. You cannot touch happiness, nor taste it, feel it run against your fingers, yet it is still a thing. You can see how others project it to you, and how you project it to them.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 02:51 PM
4

Gender is not a single thing. You have to look at what are considered feminine traits and masculine traits, both genetic and societal. For example, a strong jawline is a masculine genetic trait, whereas being the breadwinner of a household is a masculine societal trait. Your gender identity is based on your personal relation to your genetic traits and your societal traits. So you could be a masculine man, a feminine man, a masculine woman, or a feminine woman. Those all also exist on their own l…
/r/MensRights10/06/21 01:56 PM
9

I think too many people, maybe without even realizing it since they've been fighting against it for the past few decades, have accepted the viewpoint that masculine=man and feminine=woman. Maya was completely correct when she said "sex is immutable and not to be conflated with gender identity."
/r/MensRights10/06/21 01:33 PM
9

My country is a joke that has never been funny.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 01:33 PM
15

They don't consider men's rights issues to be human rights issues. Kinda telling in what they think about men.
/r/MensRights29/05/21 01:01 PM
5

Release the emails. Plaster them everywhere. Any social she has, bombard them with links to the screenshots.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 12:20 PM
24

Aren't they the same thing?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 12:28 AM
39

Because the Holy Vag can do no wrong in society's eyes.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 12:27 AM
151

That's not the telling part. The telling part is it took a dedicated campaign to out the monster.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:13 AM
3

So basically there tends to be more of an earnings gap between men and women in places it's more common for women to be stay at home mothers. I see absolutely no issue with this, and fail to see how anyone could.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 07:38 AM
24

Tell your principal if he doesn't reverse that bullshit that you'll be taking them to court for protecting the person who you've told them multiple times is abusing you.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 11:25 AM
125

I lost all my highschool friends years ago mainly because I wasn't feminist and talked about men's rights. It sucked at the time, but realistically it's better when the trash shows itself out.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 10:25 AM
15

Sadly, most Canadians will say this is perfectly fine, because my country is a fucking parody that was never funny.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 11:48 AM
53

They're better at getting rid of conservatives than they are at getting rid of pedophiles and child porn. Their moral compass is a wee bit off, I think.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 12:06 AM
22

Damn, these cunts are just completely divorced from reality, aren't they
/r/MensRights27/12/20 10:52 AM
7

It should be made legal to hunt these things for sport
/r/MensRights13/12/20 04:18 PM
4

No, just disappointed. You know what they say, "If at first you don't succeed..."
/r/MensRights07/12/20 02:53 PM
1

No, just slightly miffed yours hasn't ended yet. Seek to rectify that.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 02:49 PM
4

You know, you have every ability needed to either stop being a retarded cunt or to just entirely fuck off back to whatever hole you unfortunately crawled out of.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 02:39 PM
15

Should have told the bitch that muslims circumcise their women, and since it's religious, she must be fine with it.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 09:34 PM
1

There's always Trump Term 2: Electric Wall Boogaloo
/r/MensRights13/09/20 06:37 PM
2

Oh god, you're right. It would be worse than that feminist screech poetry thing or whatever the fuck that was a few years back
/r/MensRights13/09/20 12:36 PM
3

Can you blame anyone else for that? The closest she's come to a good shag is getting a polite smile in an elevator (which she then would call attempted rape)
/r/MensRights13/09/20 12:31 PM
3

My country is a joke that stopped being funny a long fucking time ago. Someone please burn it all to the ground.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 12:25 PM
3

Oh man, I can't wait for the executive order from Trump defunding these shit-holes.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 11:54 AM
82

Pauline Harmange hates men. So much so, that the 25-year-old French author has written a book detailing and deconstructing everything she hates about 51.9 per cent of the population: I Hate Men. “Hate will set you free,” isn’t a message we’re likely to see on a yoga t-shirt anytime soon, yet the 96-page essay – Moi Les Hommes, Je Les Déteste – that actually contains these words has sold out across France, with the first 450 copies flying off the shelves within days, a reprint of 2,500 copies sol…
/r/MensRights13/09/20 10:04 AM
24

Here's the most recent thing I can find for the case https://library.ncherm.org/library/atixa.org/65312gov.uscourts.nysd.515485.94.0.pdf?Expires=1599226643&Signature=DpTmvRWfzV3ZaVZ8bTokEKORW6A4UsBlAHK~aLc2GYiAOhdtpFHiFcmxeOUGdhBN3LEAE60jfAP3rb0E25I31QbFGWb1kAzKGhH8PTbd5Fb8wkvMigIqxaPPDiVmRj0jMnndcxRN7c0Xd53TDyL~KMGjJx434DnnelG~VY4~DVyurzcngBjB31uhzJeAv6qfLY7WXzauR0eIo0jWvxInHTxuAySI77AksWQF-QLCW22sdDKTDv5tsvexbkZUL7FCpOmI8ra-n7E9-jNZXZjjIj5K96V4Vxu6UkRDewE5y1NiIGYlc6ZY130r7RDt1hMoAbw7Y~ii4Q2YHO…
/r/MensRights04/09/20 12:40 PM
2

Yeah, appeal that and file a complaint against Judge McCunty for, you know, being a cunt.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 01:25 PM
10

Yeah, no. Were I an American, I'd be carrying a gun. And again, no. Is your reading comprehension that bad? " anyone who would disagree and try and strip me of my freedom". Fucking hell, man.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 01:24 PM
157

Because you're a man. You've had it drilled into your head by society not to hit because you're upset. Women don't have that.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 01:09 PM
17

Oh yeah, I know. It sucks, because personally I always carry a knife on me. I'm a big guy, but I'm not going bare knuckles against someone who might have a weapon. 'Be prepared' and all that Scout shit. Someone comes at me, I should have every right to defend my life by any means available to me, and I would gladly give anyone who would disagree and try and strip me of my freedom for doing so a sample of what I did to get in that situation.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 12:44 PM
1

Sadly, I can't say on here what that woman deserves because Reddit mods are a bunch of fucking spineless chicken-shits that don't get sometimes violence is an appropriate and justified response.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 12:24 PM
2

Yes, but again, it was developed as and has a primary function of being a contraceptive. Viagra wasn't developed as boner pills, the stuff was first used to treat hypertension and angina pectoris. That said, an employer shouldn't be required by law to provide insurance for any medication or such they don't want to.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 01:53 PM
10

Yes, but it's primary function is a contraceptive. Viagra's primary function is to increase blood flow.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 01:41 PM
1

Damn, I'd go off on her like her name was Dee Barnes for that shit
/r/MensRights09/07/20 09:38 AM
9

Keep recording everything in your room. Get some kind of audio recorder to carry with you around the house that you can turn on quickly and discreetly. Report her to the police and inform your landlord what is going on. Get ahead of this from a legal standing.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:56 PM
-8

Yes and no. If you made your intentions clear beforehand, they agreed, then you both got wasted and fucked, you're fine. If you either didn't make your intentions clear or you did and she said no, then you proceeded to get her intoxicated to the point she changed her mind, you're a rapist.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 10:51 PM
-6

Wording could have been better, but I'm fairly certain it means smoke weed and drink alcohol. In which case, you would only be hanging out with those women when you can get them intoxicated to the point they'd be willing to sleep with you.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 10:44 PM
7

Apply. The worst thing they can do is say no, which is what you're already telling yourself so you have literally nothing to lose.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 03:56 PM
3

...What the actual fuck did I just read? Zero to a fucking hundred right into a brick wall.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:45 PM
1

He'll still be better than Clinton or Sanders though, so there's that.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:07 AM
1

A little off topic and just out of curiosity, how much trouble could one get into in Germany for saying that Israel has no right to exist as it currently does for its crimes against Palestine?
/r/MensRights31/01/16 03:30 PM
7

Wait, if she used the 2010 CDC figures on rape then she should have been on your side. In the 12 months preceding the survey there were an almost equal number of men that were raped to the number of women who were raped when "forced to penetrate" is included in the definition of rape (which they sadly don't do because Mary Koss is a sexist cuntnugget).
/r/MensRights23/01/16 03:54 AM
4

If she thinks she's living in a part of the world where men "dominate", she is not herself a smart woman.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 09:36 PM
3

So then the takeaway from this is that it's easier to trick women into spending more if they take the basic product and modify it a bit. Welcome to the world of marketing for the past several decades.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 04:34 PM
2

If feminism was about being given women the same opportunity that men have, there should be no more feminists left, since women have every opportunity men have.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 05:01 PM
0

You handled it better than I would have man. I'd have decked the cunt so hard she'd be drinking christmas dinner through a straw for such baseless and sexist accusations.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 10:51 PM
4

This is a good idea. Now if someone's heat runs out, they'll have something to burn.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 11:49 PM
2

You know, after reading that first thing on there I realized why Cracked is in the state it's in. David Wong is retarded. That's the only way I can explain him thinking that a person isn't a person or an individual.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 12:21 PM
28

Ok, but lets take it one step further. Instead of just banning robots that can be used for sex, lets just ban all synthetic things used for sex. Say goodbye to every vibrator, dildo, butt plug, and nipple clamp. But nooo, that would be taking away the (predominantly female) people's right to choose or something.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 12:45 AM
3

6'6". God I wish I was a few inches shorter.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:00 PM
1

It doesn't surprise me in the least who this was written by, considering how little truth there is to that list.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 10:10 PM
5

Best to just end it at that point mate. If it goes on, either she's going to throw a punch, or you are out of instinct like you almost did, and in either of those scenarios, you probably end up in jail. Also, this should go without saying, but your mother could not be further from right if she tried. A person's sex doesn't matter. If a man came up and attacked you, you'd defend yourself, and if possible, you make sure to send the message to not do that again. If she wants to fight a man like a m…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 04:14 AM
1

I remember when this case started to blow up. It was just like this black cloud that hung over everything. Unfortunately, tempers flared and emotion ran free, and anyone who even dared say "Let's not condemn these boys on accusation and hearsay alone" were called rapists, rape apologists, pedophiles, and every other name under the sun. It's tragic that Rehtaeh took her life, and there were mistakes on the parts of all parties involved, but I really think the amount of hatred this all spawned was…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:17 AM
7

You would have done the exact same thing in her place, don't even try to say otherwise. You protect your children.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 07:54 PM
2

If anyone hurt my dog like this, I would make sure they suffered a thousand times worse and I would go to jail with a smile on my face and laugh all the way through my sentence.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 01:10 AM
1

Libertarian-ish, gamer, musician (bass, guitar, keyboard, cowbell, ect...), vinyl enthusiast (though I can't fucking stand hipsters who think records are cool because they're retro), fan of non-superhero comics (think Luther Strode or Transmetropolitan), Doctor Who lover, overweight but it doesn't show since I'm 6'6", boyfriend to a wonderful woman, and a consumer of a more than fair amount of porn.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 01:21 AM
6

It's not a terrible question to ask if you want a sincere answer. Would it be a surprise to anyone that someone might not know how a man can be raped, especially with all the rhetoric to the contrary?
/r/MensRights25/11/14 07:26 PM
24

No feminist outrage, just this: Why We Objectify Men Without Guilt
/r/MensRights22/11/14 07:20 PM
15

If it were to be an accurate depiction of modern feminism, the tall man would be standing in a hole to make him the same height as the short person.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:36 PM
4

I'm gonna have to side with the women on this one. Rape is not justifiable, in any situation.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 03:27 PM
3

I wouldn't say this is cheating. She gives the guys what they want, the guys do the cleaning and cooking and probably pay to do so. There's no sex involved. Actually, I think a BDSM maid service would be a fantastic idea.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 06:58 PM
2

Tell your mom and everyone else that it's none of their business, and that you don't want your dick rotting off from fucking a slut.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 11:53 PM
2

Like I said, it could very well be that all the drivers that are doing stuff like this already drive for Uber of Lyft, especially since they've been around longer. Are we really falling into the same trap as the feminists where we see something that's dominated by one group and automatically say it's sexist?
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:18 PM
4

It says right in there that female drivers are not policy, it just really worked out that male drivers usually are involved with Uber or Lyft, businesses that get the most volume at night. This is actually very smart, you have men doing the jobs, women doing the jobs, and no one has to do anything they're uncomfortable with. Your title for this, however, doesn't just miss the point, it flies right over it, shitting on it in mid-air.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:36 AM
1

I do. Some people don't like it. I don't care if they do or don't. I'm not sorry if an insult hurts your poor little sensibilities. People who get it, get it, and in my experience, it's the ones who say "you can't say that!" are the ones you have to watch out for.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:52 AM
1

Yeah, if you're a cunt and acting like a cunt, then you get called a cunt. Just like if you're an asshole and you're acting like an asshole, then you're going to get called an asshole.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 08:58 PM
1

Yeah, I said, and I quote "I really hope it turns out that this is just a case of vindictive cunts and attention vultures all flocking to easy prey". I hope it turns out that they're just vindictive cunts. I didn't say they are, I said I hope they are, because that's the outcome that means 8 women weren't abused.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 05:14 PM
0

There is literally no proof he did anything aside from what these women are saying to the media. They haven't filed a police report and I doubt they will because they just want their moment in the spotlight at the expense of crucifying a dude.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 01:35 PM
0

Yep, he's so guilty that these women have only popped up to tell the media, but not a single one has filed a police report. It almost sounds as they're doing to boost their own popularity...
/r/MensRights01/11/14 12:58 PM
0

You can't even say people looking to excuse his behavior because you can't prove he did anything. Until it's proven he's guilty, he's innocent, but hey, let's forgo that in favor of "These 8 women would never lie about this shit so lets string him up".
/r/MensRights31/10/14 10:23 PM
4

Man, if someone hits you, you hit back. Gender doesn't play into that one bit. If a bitch want to hit, a bitch wants to get hit.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:34 PM
1

No you won't, you petty little man, since it's already beyond clear at this point that he's guilty. No, it's not "beyond clear", what is clear is that there are people accusing him of some horrible shit. Last time I checked, an accusation does not make someone guilty, nor is something correct just because of how many people are saying it.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 12:17 PM
2

If it's proven that they're not victims, then they're vindictive cunts. If it's proven they are victims, they're actual victims. What I'm saying is that I hope they're just vindictive cunts. I never said I was neutral, I just said I will view him as innocent until proven guilty. Seriously though, I really only care in the context of someone is possibly being falsely accused of multiple crimes. Outside of that, I don't care about him, his life, career, the lawsuit, his political and social views,…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:33 AM
3

I'm still going to go with innocent until proven guilty. I really hope it turns out that this is just a case of vindictive cunts and attention vultures all flocking to easy prey, but if it comes out that he's guilty I'll be one of the first to say throw the book at him and let him rot.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:36 AM
10

I'm not quite sure what the correct term is for me, but I'd date anyone as long as there was a connection. It doesn't matter if you're a woman, man, trans, whatever. If I connect on an emotional and intellectual level, full steam ahead. I don't honestly think feminism has failed me, as a prerequisite for failing someone be that you were working for you to begin with, and since I'm a man that's never been the case. It wouldn't matter if I were straight, gay, asexual, or whatever I am, I was born …
/r/MensRights29/10/14 06:01 PM
132

I guess the feminists can't accept that no means no...
/r/MensRights28/10/14 01:04 PM
4

Instead of teaching girls that boys are inherently bad, teach them to respect other people's wishes of not dressing like a slut in a public school. It's not about sexuality, it's about showing respect for what is supposed to be an institution of learning.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 04:05 AM
3

Damn, they really are grasping at straws here, aren't they? "He uses some of the same words we think sound like MRA stuff, therefore he's an MRA!" In other news, I sometimes use German words, therefore I'm a NAZI! I use the same words that women use, therefore I'm a woman! I roar like a bear sometimes when I'm bored, therefore I'm a bear! M4Strings: The world's only woman nazi bear
/r/MensRights23/10/14 03:57 AM
3

See though, you can't have "cauc" in there because it's pronounced the same as "cock" and you might set off their PTSD from that one time they saw a tall building and thought it look rather phallic and somehow managed to survive the horror.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 12:36 AM
4

When it came out to my friends that I support the MRM in most issues, I was banned from one of my "friends" house, which happens to be where our group hangs out. Aside from that person, I lost at least two other friends and caused a divide in our group, all for daring to point out that Elliot Rodgers was in no way connected to the MRM. In the long run, you're probably better off.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 01:03 AM
1

And you know what, that's fine. You're allowed to hold your sexist views. But your sexist views are not welcome in the MRM.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 12:21 AM
1

Yes, because lumping everyone of a certain group together is in any way logical. The rational thing for people of the MRM to do is cut people like you loose, because we don't want to be associated with sexist people and ideas and turn into a mirror image of modern feminism.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 01:59 PM
1

Dude, what part of "get your bigot ass out of here" didn't you get? You can't take away the rights of a group of people just because they're women anymore than you could for them being men, or black, or gay. Seriously, we really do not need or want your sexist bullshit here.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 10:36 AM
1

Of course not, then they'd be punishing an innocent young woman for exploring her sexuality.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:25 PM
3

No. You get out now. And it would be pleasant if you never returned. Do not, ever, say that one group of people deserve less rights for something they have no control over. You give us a bad name, and obviously have a lot of emotional growing to do.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:47 PM
5

It's under men's rights because this is going to be used as a way to screw over guys. It threatens schools with loss of funds if they don't comply with the government's illogical and and impractical rules. Out of fear, the schools will start expelling more guys who are simply accused of some form of "sexual misconduct", including having sex with a girl who's had a few beers. Hell, under their standards, damn near everyone who's had sex would be considered a rapist.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 03:37 PM
2

Dude, why boycott Upworthy over this? This is one of the most heart wrenching things I've ever seen, and even though I first saw it back when it came out and several times since, it still never gets easier to watch.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 11:41 PM
5

Good one, jackass. Most conservatives are retarded. Most liberals are retarded. Both of them usually suck equal amounts for different reasons.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 10:35 PM
9

Far more often than not, Bill O'Reilly is worse than wrong, but I suppose even a broken clock is right twice a day.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 10:03 PM
0

Looks as though they're trying to "sully" our name
/r/MensRights01/09/14 12:15 PM
6

It's called self defense. I was brought up to never start a fight, but if a fight found me, end it.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:09 AM
5

No, if a woman is hitting you, you do what you do in any other situation. You hit back, hard enough that she knows not to do it again. Thankfully some women get this. My girlfriend understands that if she were to hit me with the intent to harm I'd knock her down before she could land a second blow. Same goes if I hit her, she'd make sure I wouldn't do it again.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 11:20 PM
2

“Not being objectified” is just one of the many advantages of being male. When we selectively revoke this freedom from body scrutiny, we don’t do anything to diminish the meaningful economic and reproductive advantages men enjoy. Really, men aren't normally objectified? I'll remember that the next time I see a commercial for men's swimwear. By their own logic then we can say women aren't normally objectified and when we choose to we don't diminish their economic and reproductive standings.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:41 AM
2

Really? I thought Jezebel just tried to be Fox News with a twist.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:24 PM
11

So Cracked is trying to be like Upworthy, and College Humor is trying to be like Cracked.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 11:27 AM
2

I have to be an optimist about humanity, especially in the face of such blinding idiocy and ineptitude. It's all that keeps me from bitch slapping almost everyone I see.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 01:19 AM
2

Or advocacy of single sex spaces will allow males or females, depending on who sets up the space and what they will allow.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 11:57 AM
1

Dude, dicks are weird. It's not the only thing on a person that looks weird though, have you ever just stopped and really just looked at a foot?
/r/MensRights19/08/14 11:08 AM
2

So then because some people don't like the idea of men only spaces and would try and shut such a space down we shouldn't allow people to decide who they allow in their spaces they created? That's the worst logic I've heard.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 11:06 AM
-5

See, I found this a bit funny. Even though MGM is horrible when done to infants or people against their will, it's still funny to laugh at foreskin humor. You know what looks weird? An uncircumcised penis. Know what else looks weird? A circumcised one. And ladies, yes, your vaginas look weird too. All genitals look weird in some way or another.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 03:17 AM
3

But that's just it, why shouldn't you be able to disallow service to any group you see fit in a space you create? Are you saying that if I create a business I shouldn't have a say in who I do business with, despite the fact that such a policy would be harmful to my business? After all, it's my time and effort that went into it and I should be free to choose who benefits from that time and effort.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 02:38 AM
3

I'm inclined to believe Mack because of the photos and the history of abuse by War Machine. Remember, this is a dude who gets hit in the head for a living and once beat himself up because of what people online said.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 11:52 PM
4

Because it's a website, and U.S. law doesn't really apply that much to the web, which is good. There's no reason why the website should be forced to allow men anyway. If someone wants to set up a space for a certain group of people that's their right to do so.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 11:49 PM
4

I know nothing about Ched Evans. I don't particularly care about Ched Evans. If he raped someone, then he's scum, if he didn't then he's probably not. Either way if he's welcomed back to something following release that's their business. Imagine that, a poster stating that one third of rapes happen while drinking, which is probably close to true. It's not an issue of people saying "well she was drunk so she was asking for it", it's people saying "we now consider any and all drunk sex rape, so ma…
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:08 PM
5

So talking about something as an example in a logical fashion is bad? I didn't know the feminists were just admitting now that anti-intellectualism is part of their movement.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 12:44 AM
1

Same reason men make up more of both the very top and very bottom of the economic ladder, men are statistically likely to take larger risks.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 12:50 PM
1

It disappears for the most part, and the remainder might just come down to men being more likely to ask for a raise or negotiate a higher starting wage.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 02:33 PM
1

My evidence is the prevailing idea in the west that women still only make roughly 77 cents per every dollar a man earns and the laws governments try to pass to "correct" this imbalance that aim to force businesses to pay women more for less dangerous work.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 09:12 AM
5

1) Where the hell are you going to get what you think MRAs are saying? Never have I in my time in the MR portion of the net have I saw an MRA say that women shouldn't have equal opportunity in the more dangerous and physically demanding fields of work. Quite to the contrary, I've observed an egalitarian stance to this, though the fact that women on average have less muscle mass than men, less women are going to apply for those jobs and probably not all the ones who do will be hired. Equality of …
/r/MensRights29/07/14 02:27 AM
11

And when is the last time you saw a "garden variety" feminist? Must have been sometime before third wave "gender" feminism, because that has it's very roots in hatred for men.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:00 AM
8

Well it could be that feminists are finally being seen as the illogical man haters they are thanks in part to the constant attention brought to the negatives of feminists and feminist theory by the MRM. The most recent example of this that seems to be gaining traction is "Women Against Feminism". It would be fine to dismiss feminists as trolls if they were harmless, but when the vocal leaders of the movement are demonstrably anti-male, they need to be called out on it.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:59 AM
27

Except after all the time the MRM has taken to point out how detrimental feminism has been to men's rights, and how groups within feminism have viewed men as anything from an oppressor or an evil monolith that needed to be overthrown to a biological mistake that needs a "final solution", it would be moronic to turn around and say "hey folks, we take it all back, feminism is double plus good!"
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:12 AM
10

Because men are so incompetent that we can't even set up a system to benefit us properly, and constantly benefits women over men...
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:06 AM
38

Then since we know it to not be true that feminism doesn't equal gender equality, and others are either willfully ignorant or manipulative to keep this status quo, why should we compromise our moral integrity and bend to the will of idiots and those who would like nothing more than for us to be silent?
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:02 AM
3

"Don't tell me not to jump, tell the building to not be so tall."
/r/MensRights22/07/14 07:50 PM
4

I believe the correct economic structure you're looking for is corporatism, since no country on this planet has real, unregulated capitalism.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 07:29 PM
6

Every time I see something like this I read to see how long before either capitalism or patriarchy are blamed for the ills of the world. At least now they're just combining the two so it's easier to see their idiocy.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:35 PM
4

WARNING: MIGHT BE OFFENSIVE! http://i.imgur.com/LATYIEC.jpg
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:47 PM
2

I see absolutely nothing wrong with what she did beyond cheating on her husband. Other than that, they're all adults and can make decisions for themselves.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 12:09 AM
4

Depending on where the poster lives, he might technically be right. Here in Canada, there is no "rape", just varying degrees of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:48 AM
2

Good goddamn am I happy I don't live in the UK. What happened to the days where politicians were just dishonest instead of the scum of the earth?
/r/MensRights07/07/14 05:25 PM
5

I get advertising that either lightly insults or playfully insults their target market, but this crosses this line by far. How well would it go over if an ad went about telling women "hey, get rid of that junkface"?
/r/MensRights07/07/14 02:38 PM
8

A better title for this "article" would be "29 Things Some Women Avoid Doing Because They're Completely Paranoid About The World Round Them And The People In It."
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:51 PM
0

Moving away for a minute from the fact that the idea of a list like this is sexist bigotry veiled as quirky fun, let's take a look at it a tiny bit based on the books on the list I've read. The Hobbit - I honestly can't remember much about this book since I last read it before highschool, but the description at least seems to fit me well enough. I love reading, and am more than willing to do sexy mouth time, so spot on so far. Lord of the Rings - Not sure how we flipped so much from The Hobbit t…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:43 AM
1

So then it's not what is right, but what society deems is "right". If that's the case than rights are nothing but arbitrary whims of the largest group and you could lose your right to your life tomorrow because "society" wants you to die. Here's how rights should be viewed, in more eloquent terms than I could put it: A “right” is a moral principle defining and sanctioning a man’s freedom of action in a social context. There is only one fundamental right (all the others are its consequences or co…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 05:01 PM
3

anything that everyone agrees makes society better when everyone has it is a right. What drugs are you smoking? You have no right to anything aside from what is legally yours. It would make society better if everyone had a house, but if someone can't pay for it then it's unfair to have everyone else pay for it or to just give what someone worked to create away for free.It would make society better if everyone could have any medical procedure done at any time, but you don't have a right to the ti…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 04:46 PM
11

Just get the clinics to bar anyone who is protesting from their property, simple as that. As for on the sidewalk or something, they have the right to say whatever they want as long as it's not a direct threat. However, protestors have no right to physically restrain or take other physical action towards people going to the clinic. It really is that simple. On a personal note though, I think the anti-abortion people are scum, and I hope that one of them tries to do something in a "stand your grou…
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:26 PM
7

And let’s hope that a parliamentary debate can answer the puzzling and so far unanswered question: why on earth would the government give Elsie Women’s Refuge to the Catholic Church? Could it possibly be because the government realized it can't keep funneling millions and millions of taxpayer dollars into shelters that don't even pretend to care about half the population? While I disagree with pretty close to everything the Catholic Church does, they seem to be a near limitless supply of funds.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:12 AM
1

I had a fedora once, it was my uncles from back in the day, but eventually I outgrew it. I own several hats now, a trilby, a few ball caps, and the most comfortable toque I've ever worn. I don't really wear any on a regular basis, though I don't see how owning or wearing a certain type of hat is a bad thing.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:08 PM
1

For some of the people currently praising Title IX, that's the whole point.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:02 AM
3

But wait, I thought the feminists had been screeching for years that feminism is a movement for everyone, so telling men they have no place to speak in feminism is pretty well as moronic as it gets. I wouldn't even mind if feminists said that feminism is for women and their rights and that's it because then they'd at least be honest, but damn, the way things are now you you have to feel torn between shaking your head while you walk away and trying to bitchslap the stupid out of people like it's …
/r/MensRights25/06/14 05:14 PM
6

I see the good intention here, but it falls flat on it's face like a drunk who got up too fast. Some of the worse ones, and counter points, are: Boys are being bullied for being weak. That's what bullies do. They pick on the small and weak to inflate their sense of self worth. Unfortunately the feminist approach to bullies seems to be tell bullies not to bully, not teach people to stand up for themselves. We think showing weakness is girly. Some people do think that, but the main idea that men s…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 03:26 AM
2

It's because the right of a private business to exclude who they see fit is apparently only applied to women's establishments. If men want a place where they can just hang out with other men though well they can just go pound sand.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 09:23 PM
14

Because any measure of a persons worth, morals, and leadership skills comes from their genitals, right? That's totally how it works now. /s Seriously though, if a female president would be a good role model to both girls and boys, then shouldn't the same be true of any male president? Why can't they stop judging people by gender and instead judge on personal integrity? Is it because they have no concept of it? Fuck, I'd vote for an asexual transgender person if they were the best candidate, but …
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:32 PM
2

But you'd still be in the same general area as her AND handing her something that she doesn't know what you've done to it. Depending on how much of a victim she identifies as, she might also think that an envelope is too close to a package, which means you're metaphorically showing her your junk.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:14 PM
6

You'd think asking why a woman why she doesn't want to go out with you/talk to you/give you her number would be a good thing, since if she gives you an actual reason you could use that information to better yourself. It even opens doors to what a lot of feminists say they want, like men listening and wanting to listen to women, trying to understand where the woman is coming from, and using that information to become more "woman friendly". Fuck, I guess you're damned if you do, damned if you don'…
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:18 AM
6

So basically women are victims more often than men because patriarchy, but when men are victims more often it's not as bad as it's caused by patriarchy. Can this person have their head any further up their own ass?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:54 PM
1

Yes, but if it were to be initially ruled against him then his daughter would go back to the neglectful mother even for a short time.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 03:59 PM
1

I think it might have been this that had gotten me banned. http://www.genderratic.com/p/4084/complaining-about-fake-geek-girls-is-not-misogyny/
/r/MensRights23/06/14 03:04 AM
2

Well there's your problem, you tried to paint men as decent human beings who experience problems, instead of cold hearted rape monsters with everything handed to them on a silver platter by the woman they've chosen to oppress today.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 03:01 AM
1

I was never given a reason, I was just sent a message stating I had been banned. From what I could see I broke no rules, yet I was never sent a response message as to why.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 02:59 AM
9

There is actually a federal law meant to deal with this type of situation, giving a 90 day period for people in service who cant make a court appearance, but the judge basically said fuck that and ordered him there anyway.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 02:51 AM
3

Matt Walsh very rarely makes a somewhat decent argument, most of his shit is just incorrect social bull or religious nonsense.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 10:35 PM
1

Really, we have free speech in Canada? When did that happen? I know we have it in our Charter of Rights And Freedoms, but we also have hate speech laws. It would actually be easier for speech that's critical of feminism to be banned here than in the United States.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 10:32 PM
8

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Gillard tossed because she sucked? If that's the case, then how is it sexism to call a woman on her stupidity? Would it not be sexist to not call them on it like we would any man if he were bumbling around like an oaf?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:53 PM
1

Unsure of how it could be solipsistic, given that my premise rests on the idea that there are other entities independent of myself, and for them to act in favor or in opposition of me would mean they must exist. The root of what I'm saying though is that experiences and fears differ from person to person so there's no way you can really say that you or I should fear rape more or less than "women", given that each woman is an individual with independent experiences and differing ways of processin…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:44 PM
1

You can't really manipulate someone who doesn't give to shit. It also helps to have the only people someone could gain leverage over me through trust me completely and most people think I'm a psycho who would stab them if they fucked with me.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:04 PM
1

I also don't drink alcohol more than like once every 4 or so months. Enjoy your martini though XD
/r/MensRights16/06/14 12:19 PM
1

I've actually had people offer me things before and be insulted when I decline. They get more insulted when I tell them that that's on them.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 12:15 PM
1

To deal with that I always am wary of when people give me something. I don't go out drinking, I don't accept shit from strangers, I'm careful and take my safety into my own hands.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:49 AM
1

Maybe, maybe not. It's not like all women fear rape equally or at all. Most of the women I know fear rape, but no more or less than being run over by a car or getting shot. I fear being raped a little less than that, but only because not many people are going to try and force a 6'6" man to do something he doesn't want to do.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:00 AM
3

Couldn't even read past the first few sentences. I could tell that it was going to be a load of shit right from the get.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 01:22 AM
0

If you're going by average, then of course men are going to be more emotional, for that exact same reason the men are going to show it less. More men do jobs that are grueling, both mentally and physically. Some of this stuff can really fuck with a guys head, so he has to bury the emotions to continue functioning.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 01:14 AM
1

Has to be a troll, there is no way someone can honestly be that goddamned stupid and be able to operate a computer, or even write out a coherent sentence, for that matter.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 10:52 PM
2

Or, you know, just get rid of the selective service all together. The idea that the government can come over and say "hey, we're going to ship you off to this god forsaken shithole to fight and probably die now" without you not being coerced is insane and criminal.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:10 PM
1

http://time.com/28641/thought-catalog-accidentally-publishes-fake-feminist-essay-jokingly-penned-by-gym-bro/
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:53 PM
1

It's sad, because half of what he says makes sense, then the other half is just complete gibberish. I mean I get not just straight up outwardly being a dick to somebody and listening to their point of view, but if that point of view is fucking retarded, I'm going to call that person retarded. Women are just as capable as men of being dumb as a sack of bricks. I view everyone as equally worthless until proven otherwise. I'll even admit that, yes, as a man I have some advantages over women in some…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:47 PM
1

True, but try pointing out that it's horribly racist to say that and people lose their fucking minds
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:44 PM
2

Don't mind at all. Wouldn't mind reading your paper when it's done.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:19 PM
6

I've had to deal with feminists that I used to consider moderates until certain exchanges happened. I was told that women have every right to hate and fear men, that women are still oppressed in our society (funny because we're all in Canada...), wage gap hurled at me, and how dare I question any of that or "PatriarchyC" because I can't possibly know the struggles women go through because I'm a man. When I try and tell them that all of that is sexist and/or insane, the resulting fallout pretty w…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:25 AM
17

Oh man, that W.A.R. spokesperson though. Apparently convicting people for false rape allegations is used to divert funding that could go to rape investigations, and pursuing false rape accusers is a witch hunt to prevent victims from coming forward. Wow. Just fucking wow. How far up your own ass is your head if you can say that shit and mean it?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:05 AM
1

Just like with anything else, it'll fuck shit up royally.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:08 PM
5

While I haven't seen the film, I imagine it might bring up a few good and/or thought provoking points. Personally, I think the distinction really needs to be made between pedophilia and hebephilia, because we seem to be using pedophilia as a catch all term for people who find anyone under 18 sexually attractive. A healthier way to think of it would be pedophilia is wrong because it sexualizes a nonsexual entity, whereas hebephilia is just one sexual being finding another sexual being attractive …
/r/MensRights11/06/14 11:18 AM
5

Here's what really gets me, though. All men are part of rape culture, so we need to all try really hard to point out and take a stand against any and all transgressions no matter how small. Even if we do that and become the perfect feminist lapdog, it doesn't even matter, because we're still men and therefor part of rape culture. Fuck, it's like you're not even allowed to be an individual anymore, you're just supposed to be some number doing what you're told for the "greater good".
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:20 AM
2

Though remember, being a mother is the most difficult job in the world and every one of them need to be praised to high heaven, especially the stay at home ones.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:26 PM
3

I was going to joke about how it must be the fault of white men because whites secretly control every aspect of everyone's lives, so of course it's actually the fault of white patriarchy. Then I saw that's exactly how she though, and I weep for humanity.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:24 PM
1

Ah, but you see, the tea cup was a little boy, and we all know that a tea pot is absolutely useless without a tea cup, thus even though it was a child turned into a tea cup, it was a male child, and therefore oppressive, either by implying that women are only useful in relation to males or are only useful for looking after their offspring. As for the man being a clock, well, clocks tell you what time it is. Always reminding you of what you have to do at any given moment, never giving you a break…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:06 AM
1

Didn't you know? Turning a man into a frog is fine because he's still a living creature capable of thoughts and feelings, and turning a man into a candle stick is fine because It shows how bright and useful men are seen as in society. But if a woman has her wings cut off then it's a rape metaphor, and if a woman is turned into a tea pot it's a reflection of how women are seen as domestic objects by society. Sadly, that's probably fairly close to the line of thinking of the author.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:48 PM
3

I'd just like to see the demographic changed and see how long it takes for someone to whoop the authors ass. Say if someone changed "men" to "blacks" and "rape culture" to "bike theft culture", what would happen? How many people would be outraged, and rightly so?
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:24 AM
3

Well fuck me sideways, they're starting to be more honest. This will either end with a large divide between feminists and destroy whatever credibility the movement may have left, or more feminists will start agreeing with this line of thinking, driving the few sane ones away, which results in it falling apart anyways and we can all laugh at the horrible state they've left the place in.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:25 PM
2

Humor also depends greatly on the target audience. She could probably tell that joke to more extreme feminists and get a laugh. George Carlin could joke about rape because his target audience was a bunch of "sick fucks". What you joke about can also greatly depend about what the person telling it is going through at that particular time. I just don't get people who feel that they have the right to never be offended. Ironically, I find it quite offensive that people feel they have the right to di…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:03 PM
2

Still not sure if troll or retard. Explain then how a governing body telling someone they can't have an abortion and threatening said person with fines and jail time if they do not institutionalized sexism?
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:52 PM
3

I'm not sure if you're trolling, or if you're just an idiot. I'd like to see you try to explain how government telling women they can't have an abortion in some states is either institutional sexism against men or that it isn't (it is, btw). Please, if you're going to be ignorant, do it somewhere else.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 04:40 PM
2

Sexisim towards both, but sexism in opposition of men and in favor of women.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:15 PM
2

Oh it's definitely sexism towards both sexes, but I would say it's sexism against men and sexism in favor of women.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 04:49 AM
3

Wow, that really takes a lot of gall. To bad she's a moron or she could do good things.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:47 AM
3

I just treat everyone as though they're a blithering idiot until proven otherwise, genitalia don't really play into that.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:40 PM
25

So... sexism against men is actually sexism against women?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:39 PM
1

Probably meant objects as meaning a thing that isn't alive or have higher mental faculties.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:40 PM
2

I wouldn't say scum, but unemployed men are seen as lesser, and as an unemployed man, I understand it. Traditionally, a man's sense of worth, both in a societal and a self sense, is derived at least partially from his ability to provide for himself and his loved ones. Personally, I think this is a noble thing to strive for. Proving your worth through your actions, wanting to provide for and protect the ones you love, those are things to strive for.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:36 PM
14

So, according to this article, PUA, PUAhate, and TRP are all MR? Not a single link in there lead to anything explicitly MR, it was all to TRP, which can be a pretty toxic place.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:12 PM
1

Since you can be damn near sure nothing would be done, and if something was the media would spin it against us.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:13 AM
5

You ever see a boy wear shorts that short to school? I know in my old highschool, a dude would have been either laughed at or sent home, yet at the same time I've seen girls go to school with those on and no one bats a damned eye (maybe because my school was one of the slightly more ghetto schools).
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:08 AM
1

Of course they receive backlash, even the moderate ones, but guess what? It's not because they're some oppressed class, otherwise men wouldn't receive death threats, rape threats, or threats of terrorism as well from women, which we can see that they do if you look at the recent threats about the Men's Conference. The fact is there are shitty people, and there will always be shitty people, but that's all it is, not some male conspiracy to keep all women subjugated and fearful.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:44 PM
2

Why is it that no feminist writer I've ever seen has been able to see that calling a boy a girl isn't meant as an insult because girls are weaker, it's an insult because you're calling into question a large part of that child's identity at that stage of development, even if they can't understand that thought?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:21 PM
24

I would love to ask her how she can be part of an oppressed underclass of people and publicly state that men need to be eradicated because they're the oppressors? Doesn't the fact she can public argue that point flip her argument on it's ear?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:16 PM
5

Of course not. The reasonable thing is to just get rid of government affirmative action for all groups and figure out a system that best suits everyone's needs.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 10:56 PM
5

A few refutations: Feminists do not want you to lose custody of your children. The assumption that women are naturally better caregivers is part of patriarchy. Actually, it's mostly thanks to the feminist backed Tender Years doctrine. Feminists do not want you to have to make alimony payments. Alimony is set up to combat the fact that women have been historically expected to prioritize domestic duties over professional goals, thus minimizing their earning potential if their “traditional” marriag…
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:01 PM
10

I am indeed afraid of walking alone at night, that's why I carry my keys and a knife on me at all times. I'm also no more suspicious of men than I am of women at night because being an idiot wanting to get beat down for starting shit isn't gender exclusive.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 03:37 PM
5

It's not a stupid question, but it is based on a stupid picture. There is no standard unit of pain, as pain is subjective. Unfortunately people see something like this and it's either like "see how great and strong women are? dur dur dur" or "it's on the internet so it must be true dur dur dur".
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:46 PM
1

You know, I almost wrote out a lengthy response to every point, but I'm not actually sure your higher brain functions are fully intact...
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:54 PM
19

It can be difficult sometimes to talk to women because not only could she think that I'm hitting on her, my girlfriend could also think I'm hitting on her. Somehow it's gotten to the point where if you're a genuinely decent person to a woman you must be trying to get in her pants and if you're neutral or not kind you're a dick and possibly a misogynist. As for knowing or not if a girl is interested, this can be either a miscommunication or lack of communication on one or both sides. If either pa…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:42 PM
4

Of course men can wear dresses, and everybody has the right to be different, you'd just never catch me in one because I don't have the legs for it.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:29 PM
2

You tried your best. All you can do now is watch her brain rot if she won't see reason.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:22 PM
4

No sources, no credibility. When will they actually get that? Or do they just not because it's all overblown rhetoric?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:31 AM
6

Friend of mine had posted after the shooting that we should basically burn down the entire concept of MRA. After a lengthy argument with him and a few other friends, where I pointed out that PUA isn't MRA, from what the shooter spoke about he hated men and women equally, that he was mentally ill, and that men have issues that need to be adressed and that not only women fear violence (using me always carrying a knife and keys with me as example), I was basically told to get lost, I was wrong, sho…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:47 AM
1

I would have smashed her back, screaming about how she was assaulting you and trying to kidnap your drunk fiancee.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 11:29 AM
1

Everything else aside, I do like a lot of the riffs you got going on there. Those, and the audio clip from Clerks 2.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 11:43 PM
1

Troll. Banned. NEXT!
/r/MensRights22/05/14 11:39 PM
5

So it's a site that you can buy the company of a man from? That's what I'm getting from it at least, and it doesn't seem at all bad.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 02:32 PM
0

True, but with politics you have to look at every step to the theory, not just part of the end. If doing something horrible eventually creates something that appears to be good, it's not good, because the ends don't justify the means. Even if there were no black and white, only gray as you seem to imply, then the ideal would be the lightest shade of gray there is. Same with love. When you love someone, you love them for a reason, for the values they hold, beliefs, achivements, aspirations, physi…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 01:30 PM
467

Should have flipped it back on her. Said "you seem rather interested in getting this intoxicated woman back to your house, maybe you're the rapist."
/r/MensRights22/05/14 01:05 PM
2

If she's that level headed and right minded about that issue, what makes you think she wouldn't be equally sensible in her other intellectual endeavors? Sure, people aren't always consistent when it comes to all issues, but it's better to hold on to the best possibility rather than someone who is consistently wrong.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 12:41 PM
9

Keep her as though your life depended on it.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 12:24 AM
4

They said $75 each, they agreed to be pepper sprayed, it's funny as fuck. Dudes get their money, the woman gets a show, I get my kicks, everybody wins.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 12:21 AM
2

Yeah, ok, porn is harmful. And the sun orbits the earth, the moon is made of cheese, and the printing press is an invention of satan. Porn has had absolutely no negative effects on me. In fact, I can say that pornography has allowed me to explore my own sexuality in a safe environment, has helped me be a more confident person, and has helped me in sexual relationships. What it hasn't done is diminished my respect in women or men, made me sexually abusive, or made me want to rape anyone. (bit of …
/r/MensRights18/05/14 05:44 PM
2

The man agreed to give his sperm to fertilize them and did so. This is only outrage if he is forced to pay child support, which sadly he probably will be.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 04:17 PM
1

Sometimes you have to hit back, even if it didn't hurt that much, out of principle. You need to make it known that hitting you is not ok and there are consequences. Now, of course it's an overreaction if a woman slaps you and you aim to knock her out, but you have to stand your ground.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:49 PM
2

No one is saying Fortgang did not sow seeds, but checking his privilege is just acknowledging that the ground he tilled was more fertile than the ground others tilled. They could have spent the same amount of time in the hot sun, watering these seeds, but Fortgang might still reap better results because of certain advantages. But then the issue become not that his success is attributed to the fact that he is a white male, but that he has a better lot in life because of where he was born and to w…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 12:10 PM
0

That was the point. Did that one just kinda fly over your head?
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:11 AM
87

I'd like to see this just to ask so many dumb questions that it'd make their heads spin. "What if I don't identify within the gender binary or I was physically born with characteristics of both sexes?" "Do I actually have to be disabled, a person of colour, an indigenous, or a queer person, or do I just have to identify as one?" "What do you mean I'm not a person of colour, just because I'm less than 1/16th native and my African ancestry dates back to when the first people left to explore?" "I'm…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 02:02 AM
7

It's not even worth it. Sometimes you just have to click the unfriend button and let people be willingly retarded on their own.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:30 AM
10

Good on ya for telling him. You probably just helped save him from getting legally fucked for the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 07:48 PM
10

I think I read three sentences total from this before I wanted to drill a hole in my head to get those sentences out of my brain...
/r/MensRights03/05/14 09:13 PM
4

Tell him. No one has a right to con someone into a situation they don't want, especially not one that will trap them into emotional and financial servitude.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 04:16 PM
2

And here's the totally not expected feminist response /s http://imgur.com/jfXLGtA
/r/MensRights02/05/14 11:13 AM
1

PLEASE NOTE THAT MY COMMENT IS NSFW AND IF YOU ARE UNCOMFORTABLE WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF ROUGH SEXPLAY THEN MOVE ALONG! That doesn't even come close to some demented shit I've seen. Belle Knox has (as far as I've seen) not been tied to a wooden X with low grade rope, had her breasts stretched and tied so tight they turn purple, been fucked by three machines simultaneously, while a man jizzed into a pair of panties and shoved them in her mouth. Until that happens, she hasn't really done anything ter…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:47 AM
1

Man, if her shit is what you consider "some of the most violent/degrading porn in the industry", then you haven't seen a lot of the shit that's out there. All I can really say is that when you're over the sensationalist hype of it she's not all that attractive, her skills are meh, her degree will be useless, and she's contributing to the idea that people who's greatest achievement is fucking on camera should be looked up to.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 01:57 AM
11

Is it possible there are less women in prominent films or in leading rolls because less women are in the field? I mean, I've heard stories of how tough it is to get into acting, how much you need to sacrifice to have the smallest chance of making it, and how you're more likely to basically die in obscurity chasing your dream. We know that statistically men are more likely to take large risks, so why is it shocking when applied to a certain field? Yep, let's just cram women into movies just to be…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 12:55 AM
5

If any of these schools still had a spine they'd sue UltraViolet for libel.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 12:16 AM
2

We don't teach people ridiculous and inappropriate levels of traffic fear. We don't teach people how to avoid being deliberately run over by drunk drivers. No, we don't teach ridiculous levels of traffic fear or how to avoid being deliberately hit by a drunk driver, but we do tell people to exercise extreme caution in the presence of a 2+tonne mass of metal, glass, and rubber that is capable of going in excess of 200mph. Women aren't children. They won't have child like ignorance if people stop …
/r/MensRights30/04/14 06:58 PM
3

We teach people to look both ways before crossing the street and to lock their doors as well because people are supposed to be able to recognize a problem and act to avoid it, not put on blinders, plug their ears, and go wandering out into traffic with childlike ignorance.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:13 PM
3

We agree that the fact that women have to watch how they dress because they might be sexually harrased or assaulted is bad, but suggesting that while this is a problem that they should take precautions isn't "normalizing", it's telling people to avoid something that might lead to them becoming victims.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 12:39 PM
1

Never mind the discussions on here, AVFM, AVFMS, other men's rights sites, anti-feminism sites, and so on, we have no clue what we're talking about. It's like saying "I've never met a feminist who's a decent person, therefore no feminist is a good person". We know that the idea of rape culture is that we are a society that promotes, condones, and normalizes rape and protects rapists while blaming victims. We fight against that idea every day.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 11:59 AM
2

We know what it's about, we've been blasted with it and fighting against the notion of the west as a rape culture for years.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 10:18 AM
9

Unfortunately, we've come to the point where if even one drop of alcohol passes someone's lips, they're seen as being unable to consent. People are taking "incapacitated" to mean even slightly inebriated and it's madening. I'm not sure how Mr. Sokolow couldn't have seen where his policies would lead, but he does seem to show some genuine concern, so maybe he was just ignorant and short sighted rather than intentionally malicious.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 11:30 AM
13

Didn't you get the fememo? Having any sort of sexual preference for one group is sexist/racist/ableist and oppressive to all people within that group. On the flip side, not including someone in your list of sexual preferences is also sexist/racist/ableist and oppressive to all people within that group. Remember, feminists want you to see no difference at all between any people, have no personal preference, and if you dare to do so you're the scum of the earth.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 10:52 PM
2

See though, I do draw a rather large line between the physical sex of someone and their gender identity. Someone's physical sex is usually what I'll base what I think they are on, unless I'm told that a person prefers to be referred to as something else. It all comes down to the physical versus the identity.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:32 PM
3

There's much research and empirical evidence to show that gender identity and sex aren't related. ... That's exactly what I've stated. You should know, you responded to that part of my comment too (although with nothing that had anything to do with it...) I said "Where the author is coming from, however, is that people who feel as though hey were born into the wrong body, but that's less to do with chromosomes and more to do with psychology and brain chemistry." I get that there's a difference b…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:56 PM
7

There are things here that I agree and disagree with. (1.) Virginity exists. A virgin, by definition, is someone who has never had sex. If you've never had sex, then your virginity is "intact". (2.) Hymens are a sign of virginity. This is true, hymens are not a sign of virginity because not everyone is born with a hymen, some people who do have them break without sex, and so on like the article says. (3.) All women are born with vaginas. For the sake of this, I'm going to define people by chromo…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 04:44 PM
1

That has to be a troll article, right? I mean, there's no way someone could write that and be sincere. Aside from that, criticism of communism isn't misogyny, it's logical.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 12:24 PM
0

I agree with Tj Sotomayor, that bitch needs a slap.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 11:40 PM
8

It's totally untrue that the Men's Rights Movement don't help men. The MRM aims to help men and boys as much as possible, but unfortunately, feminist organizations try to block a lot of our attempts by calling us hate speech, disrupting events, and even legal action, then they get pissy when we rightly attack feminism right back. They want to not allow men's centers at universities, some actively fight men's DV shelters, and so on. All you need to do is go through maybe a month on this sub and y…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:31 PM
9

In fact, this casual quote from a TV director unwittingly tells us quite a lot about what our culture thinks about rape. Namely, that Americans think it barely exists. They don’t seem to see rape anywhere. As opposed to feminists who see rape everywhere, even where it isn't?
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:09 AM
14

Of course not, because girls are special and delicate and need to be protected at all cost from every form of negative action, while boys are just kind of there.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:24 PM
15

Because some parents seem to think that it's totally fine to maim, mutilate, or otherwise alter their child's body however they see fit, usually predicated on the idea of "he's my son so it's my choice".
/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:19 PM
2

It means that I believe everyone, regardless of age, sex, race, religion, gender identity, and financial standing should have the same basic inalienable rights and freedoms protected by, but not created by, the government. Simplistically, I suppose what you could list as these rights are the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, though, since people seem to have managed to twist even that it might be best to phrase it as "everyone has the right to pursue their own goals and inter…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 08:14 AM
0

Exactly. She should definitely be fired from her job and have her teaching license revoked, but beyond that, it shouldn't really be a big deal if both parties consented. Unfortunately, when someone post something like this to point out a double standard people tend to fall to the more feminist train of thought, being that someone can't possibly consent to sex with someone who has any authority over them, even if that authority isn't used to coerce the person.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 07:19 AM
6

This will probably get me downvoted to oblivion, but what is up with this idea that 16 & 17 year olds can't possibly consent to sex with anyone over the age of majority, but as soon as they turn 18 then some switch is flipped and they're perfectly fine and able to mentally handle having sex? I'd understand if it were a grown person and someone who's like 14 or under, but after that you should really have learned the proper way to handle yourself and those around you. If you want it, go for it, i…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 06:56 AM
7

That's a bit of a loaded question, isn't it? What does "complete equality" even mean? I believe in equal rights for everyone, but beyond that it's sort of a "go your own path" kind of deal. No one is the same as anyone else, so no one can be completely equal to anyone else.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 04:09 PM
1

You'd be surprised what jobs require heavy lifting. I've applied to two jobs before that required you to be able to lift 50+ pounds and they were liquor store cashier (50lbs) and small chocolate store cook (70lbs). Ultimately, it doesn't come down to if a large number of women are strong enough to do the work, it comes down to if they prioritize hard work over comfort.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:58 AM
25

Isn't that basically every feminist argument though?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 06:00 PM
1

There may very well be people here who are bitter towards all women, but I like to think that the majority of us here are more rational than that. I get that a hurt man can scorn the woman who wronged him and feel the same towards all of them, but it's like saying a black dude stole your bike, therefore you now hate all black dudes.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 01:12 AM
1

Not at all. Say you have a large man, '6'6", big muscles, strong, he might go and do physical labor because it might be what he's more suited to do. If a woman is 5'0" and skinny, she's a lot less likely to go into that same field with the man, because she knows that she's not physically built to do it.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 11:44 AM
1

No no no, I would never argue that differences in the sexes inherently lead to different career choices, though the differences might influence a person's individual decision for what they want to do for a living.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 05:27 AM
1

How is the fact that women are biologically capable of carrying and nursing a baby and that men on average have more muscle mass sexist?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 04:51 AM
1

It's the basic nature of all creatures to want to pass on their genetic lineage and make sure it survives. Traditionally this means the man going out and doing the work and the woman taking care of the child, because that's just the way the different sexes evolved. Obviously things have changed slightly in our modern society, but thousands upon thousands of years of evolution can't be turned on it's head in the span of 60-odd years.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 04:22 AM
3

GODDAMNIT! I don't need some asshole who I didn't vote for telling me that I play a role in violence against women even if I'm not a perpetrator of said violence. Fuck Mike Savage, fuck the Halifax Police, fuck this bullshit acceptance of sexism against men. I'm surrounded and governed by morons who need instruction on how to wipe their own asses printed on the toilet paper. FUCK THIS!
/r/MensRights06/04/14 12:10 PM
1

You want disturbing beliefs? Look up Laci Green.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 04:15 PM
2

The origin is a study done by the woman named on the page done 36 years ago about highschooler's ideas regarding forced sexual encounters and when rape is ok. It makes the rounds every so often with people pointing to it and screaming "look, this proves we live in a rape culture!" while ignoring how long ago it's from and that no matter the era, high school students are not near a good example of cultural attitudes.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 01:18 AM
3

I'm not saying that there aren't men who want to go into traditionally female dominated fields, I'm saying there is fields that women are statistically more inclined to enter than men are. It's not just men who mock men for going into "women" jobs, women also mock those men, but then, that doesn't play into your narrative, does it? Who are you to know what women would choose? Just because what the majority wants to do isn't what most men want to do doesn't mean it's some oppressive cultural forc…
/r/MensRights04/04/14 12:34 AM
3

If you believe that every man and women are the same physically and mentally then you have never been in the real world. You're saying that some invisible force is invalidating every choice women make based on their own aspirations. Woman wants to be a care worker instead of a doctor? PATRIARCHY! But if your country wasn't founded on christian values and there can be no legal imposition of religion in your country then your argument boils down to "christians were in power at one time in another …
/r/MensRights03/04/14 11:16 AM
3

You're still arguing as though everyone is the same, with the same physical and mental faculties, same aspirations, dreams, wants, needs, and so on. It's not that more women tend to choose jobs that pay less because they pay less, it's all about personal priority and how important the job is. You're essentially saying that women going into fields that pay less of their own free will is due to men being sexist. It doesn't matter that in the U.S. most (but not all e.g. Thomas Jefferson) were chris…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 03:30 AM
6

Women do make the same amount as men when you account for the factors of choice, both those leading up to getting a job and on the job itself. It's incorrect to look at the male astrophysicist who works 50+ hours a week and the female coffee slinger at starbucks working maybe 30 hours a week. A truly egalitarian view point would accept that people make different choices, and that if a large group of women choose lower income jobs it's not sexism or "the patriarchy". Tell me, how do we in the Wes…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:26 AM
6

It worked well for a short while, but then people got up in arms about confiscating property, and now it's acceptable to have them in school because they're good to have on if you or someone you know is in an emergency.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:04 AM
4

Flip it on him then. Say that if a man having an erection is consent, then a woman being wet is consent as well. After all, both are physically stimulated, and that's as good as consent, right?
/r/MensRights03/04/14 01:08 AM
4

My beliefs as an egalitarian are such that I believe all men and women are equal to pursue what course in life that they may, with no barriers or inconsistencies between them. If men make on average 33% more than women, women should be given raises, so as to make it roughly equal. Men and women do make the same money when you account for time worked, job, danger level, education required, and other factors. The wage gap myth is just that, a myth. The 33% stat comes from averaging the pay of all …
/r/MensRights03/04/14 12:48 AM
26

All that should really matter is that something is causing a distraction and that needs to be addressed. It's the same as when cellphones became really popular and commonplace, they banned use in schools because it was a distraction. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 12:32 AM
5

Actually, they use so many different sources for their stats that it seems more like a jumbled mess hurriedly thrown together in an attempt to say "look how dangerous it is to be a woman!" They admit, however, at the bottom of the page that their definition of rape is one-sided: Rape, as defined by the NCVS, is forced sexual intercourse. Forced sexual intercourse means vaginal, oral, or anal penetration by offender(s). This category includes incidents where the penetration is from a foreign obje…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 12:27 AM
5

Report them for sexism and use the CDC numbers to discredit their 1 in 33 men stat, since they are using the government definition of rape which makes it almost impossible for male victims to count.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 10:53 PM
2

Hey, I call them like I see them.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 06:29 PM
1

But it is true though, not all feminists are the horrible feminazis that we see and hear about.The problem is that even the "moderate" ones don't tend to speak out about the radical ones. The way I look at it, feminists are like christians, some of them are nice, some of them are not, but the people need to be judged on an individual basis on their beliefs and actions based on these, even though both ideologies are harmful mental rot.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 11:27 AM
6

I called them a while back for a noise complaint at 11pm. It took the cop three times and a call back from the dispatch at midnight for them to realize that the cop was driving on the wrong damned road, and they both treated it as if it were my fault. I swear these fools don't have a fucking brain between the lot of them.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 01:27 AM
6

And there's not even a function on their website to complain about it. Every option under complaints is for Metro Transit or limo drivers.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 05:50 PM
8

Oh for fuck sake. Can't the police here do any fucking good? I'm sick of the Halifax police and their bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 05:46 PM
1

There are some kinda good points on here, namely being that the body mass index (BMI) isn't at all a good measurement from individual to individual. It only takes into account mass but doesn't differentiate between fat and muscle. I can also say that height and body type throws a big wrench into it because if looked up mine before and I'm 6'5" with a broad chest and shoulders. Theres a difference between saying "theres this one ideal and everyone should strive for it even if physically impossibl…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 09:38 AM
0

I'm more upset that divorce parties are an actual thing. What the fuck? Though I did find the joke "She seems chipper about the whole deal" to be humorous, but I do have a dark sense of humor.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 09:23 AM
2

Didn't even take the article seriously when the first line tossed up the 1 in 5 "statistic", though their wording was better "1 in 5 women will report being raped". I skimmed the article and what jumped out at me was “If we follow her submission that women should be taught to avoid situations of danger and blame women for being sexually assaulted, then should we not teach everyone to avoid being hit by drunk drivers? What the hell is wrong with this person? We do teach people ways to avoid being…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 09:19 AM
2

Honestly, I'd try to talk it out with her if you feel strongly about her, but you may also benefit from taking a real look at what you have in common and what you like about her and weighing it against then negatives. You might just come to the conclusion that it isn't worth it, and that that's ok.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 07:44 PM
2

I don't really care about this, aside from the racist bits that seem said in all seriousness. If it was said in jest then I wouldn't mind at all. Though I can't help but think that if a guy made a video called "You might have a gaping vagina if..." people would be outraged.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 04:29 PM
1

Please put the pictures in the correct order, I can't tell which goes where.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 01:08 AM
2

I argued about this on facebook a while back for four hours. Honestly, I can't stand to watch this annoying cunt again, but from what I remember, her main point was that women are seen as a collection of sexualized parts while men are seen as whole people. I can't remember if she said anything concerning male sexual objectification, but I'm fairly certain she played it off as male power fantasies. Her arguments are based less on fact and more on appeals to emotion. She says sexual objectificatio…
/r/MensRights27/03/14 03:26 PM
2

Damn, fighting back tears by the end of it. I feel for this dude.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 10:39 AM
2

Socialism has no problem whatever with individual rights or private property. It's about the ownership of the means of production and seeks to free the individual from exploitation. Literally two sentences, one after the other, and you manage to contradict your own point. If socialism had no problem with private ownership, then there would be no issue with private ownership of the means of production. Just because someone makes something and it is needed or wanted by a mass group of people doesn…
/r/MensRights27/03/14 10:34 AM
1

Because once you get past the slight difference in the words the left and the right, you realize that they're actually really quite similar.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 02:49 AM
5

Obama was and continues to be a feminist appeasing moron. The most recent example of this is his parroting of the 77 cents myth in his State of the Union address.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 02:47 AM
1

Socialism : a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods The idea of socialism, that individual rights and property shouldn't exist, instead favoring either community or government ownership of means of production are a direct con…
/r/MensRights27/03/14 12:28 AM
10

Did it occur to anyone that perhaps the "man tissues" aren't for tears or a runny nose?
/r/MensRights26/03/14 04:44 PM
3

There might not even be any trouble, as using copyrighted material in Canada for instances of research, private study, education, parody, satire, criticism or review and news reporting can all fall under the fair dealing exception to copyright. Seeing as this is a parody, a criticism, and meant to be educational, it could arguably fall into the fair dealings category.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 02:41 AM
4

Why don't they just come out and say it already? "Your comfort is oppressive!"
/r/MensRights25/03/14 04:12 AM
2

You have no idea of the power of an idiot with a victim complex in a position of high power.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 11:47 AM
19

I guess that she doesn't realize that women already have the rights that men have. Just because a woman has the right to go work in the coal mines though doesn't mean she's going to. The problem with people like Hillary is that they don't regard others as unique individuals, but rather as just a number that's interchangeable with any other number who should all want the same, walk the same, talk the same, and think the same. I have a feeling that if Hillary runs in 2016, she'll win. She'll ride …
/r/MensRights23/03/14 01:36 AM
3

I understand where they're coming from. I get how their stance is what is is based on the information they have, like the "so few accused rapists are convicted" line. Unfortunately, they refuse the logical path of "that must mean that rapes aren't as prevalent as we thought" and go more to the "that must mean they're all rapists and are just being let off the hook by a sexist court system" route. It's sad that their anti-sexuality and anti-rights(for men)/ant-responsibility(for women) agenda is …
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:37 PM
-5

But with circumcision it's not "unknowingly" inflicted self harm. They know they're going to have a bit of their dick lopped off.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:26 PM
-14

There's a difference between saying "drink this water" and it's really poison and the person dies and saying something like "lop off your pinky toe and you can run faster". Sure it's false information, but if it's voluntary and safe, then who cares? It's their own damned fault for buying bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:15 PM
1

People make desicions based on false information all the time, doesn't mean it's not their right so long as it harms no one else. This is a complete non issue if the circumcisions are VOLUNTARY. Sure, they're being fucking stupid for the most part, but so what?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:06 PM
3

Anyway , the simple answer is that boobs are sexual things. This is true, but only to a certain extent. Breasts are one of the things women can use to attract a mate, though the same can be said of almost any attribute a woman may possess. Long legs, bright hair, clear skin, wide hips, it all helps attract others. A woman walking around showing her tits is no more sexual than a man walking around showing off his six pack abs.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:27 PM
0

I'm not sure how this is sexist. Nowhere does it say that all men are attackers or that only women are victims. It's helpful tips to avoid or get out of bad situations, primarily aimed at women. Just because something is intended to be read by a certain group or says "here's some helpful hint, especially if you're a member of 'group x'" doesn't mean it's sexist. On a broader note, what the fuck? Are we really to the point where we're calling everything that isn't either completely gender neutral…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:06 AM
26

Just another feminist idiot who thinks being assumed innocent until proven guilty of something is sexist. In other news, water is wet.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:27 PM
3

Some of the comments to the article are horrible, though not in the least bit shocking. BigSteve goes for the racism and homophobia mix with: A soul brother turning down sex with white women? Not buying a word of it. Unless he is... well... you know. "Different." And teamchaos went with just the assumption that he's gay, saying: Iooking at him im surprised they didn't mention his "partner" the one girl is hot. No more proof needed for me
/r/MensRights05/03/14 09:08 PM
2

http://i.imgur.com/qSTSU25.jpg
/r/MensRights05/03/14 12:06 AM
2

Good. Maybe if the Boy Scouts get a cut to their money then they'll reconsider their policy.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 06:06 PM
1

If I don't want you to touch my shoulder, you have no right to touch my shoulder. Your rights end where my body begins. Unless I say you can do something to me, you can't, because you have no right over my body. If you do and I don't want you too, that is a violation of my bodily autonomy and therefore wrong.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 04:07 PM
1

Ok, I'll play your game. Bad defined as something that violates the bodily autonomy of another person. In this context rape can never be ok as rape is sex against someone's will. Even if, as in your completely impossible scenario, you could rewind time to before the even took place, you have still commited an act. By logic as twisted as yours, you'd be guilty of a crime that you commited but never happened for anyone else. Also, I'm calling you retarded because you must have eaten lead paint chi…
/r/MensRights27/02/14 03:45 PM
3

Not even going to get into how retarded you are, becasue it's fairly evident to anyone who can understand the english language. What I will do though is point out that if you're using the standard of something being good or bad depending on what harms someone else when they don't want the act inflicted on them, that is an objective moral stance, which you had just said is impossible. Congratulations, you're retarded and self-contradictry.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 03:24 PM
2

I got through the second paragraph and that's all I could take. Damn, reading people like this I can't help but feel we've gone back to a point in time where tribalism ruled, this time swapping a god as the all powerful force of destruction for gender.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 12:39 AM
2

What I got from this is "No means no, but does yes always mean yes?" This is the problem we have now. We have feminists having it so men are so afraid to display any amount of sexuality, they've got it so that men don't know if they're coming or going. Yes, consent is important, but to say that getting consent doesn't actually mean she consents in some cases is moronic and harmful to everyone.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 12:43 PM
8

Man, just tell those girls that you're just trying to grow facial hair as nice as theirs. No need to be polite to assholes.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:34 PM
1

I'm shocked! The trolls have a proper vocabulary and a grasp of grammar now.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 12:11 AM
1

Man, I've had painfully long discussions about the retardedness that is "trigger warnings". Basically all I can say to them is "oh, that's a trigger for you? Well the closest I have is stupid people saying fucking trigger warning. Makes me lose it in a fit of rage where I beat motherfuckers with a baseball bat."
/r/MensRights12/02/14 02:33 AM
2

I know, I was actually rather hesitant to click the link first time I saw it, figuring it was just some poor castrated fellow with his needle on the broken "men are bad" record.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 12:29 AM
6

And in other news, "Jesus Christ in a titty bar" is now my favorite quote and mental image of all time.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 12:26 AM
-1

While this is true that they are a CE school, it is stated at the end of the article that the school is following government guidelines. According to government guidelines, school meals must be balanced and have fruit, vegetables, bread, cereal and meat, poultry or oily fish. Fizzy drinks, crisps, chocolate or sweets in school meals are ruled out.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 02:13 PM
8

Not quite sure how this is a men's rights issue, but I will say this, the Brits need to get their fucking act together. What bullshit are they thinking when they say your food you eat for lunch needs to be approved by the bloody government?
/r/MensRights11/02/14 10:54 AM
3

The problem is that there is no real direction to feminism, just different fragments all saying "no, feminism is this". Are there good feminists? Of course, but the movement has fragmented, begun to implode,and the most vocal and influential are the feminazi ones.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 03:59 AM
2

But we are addressing male concerns. The difference between the MHRM and feminism is that instead of saying "here's a problem, let's bitch and complain until someone fixes it" we say "here's a problem, here's what it's caused by, lets address the root issue instead of trying to kill the hydra by cutting off it's heads one by one".
/r/MensRights11/02/14 03:50 AM
3

When we have anti-male policies being made at the request of feminist leaning lobbies, when feminists want to erase half of the victims of sexual and domestic violence, paint all men as potential rapists, and spread smear campaigns of misinformation such as saying that the MHRM is a hate group or that women still make 77 cents for every dollar that a man makes for the same work, we're going to call them on their bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 03:37 AM
4

The problem though is that feminism doesn't equal women's rights anymore, nor does being anti-feminist equal being anti-woman.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 03:26 AM
99

I want to take a moment to point out that, while all of these reek of mangina, part of #3 makes an excellent point. Rejection hurts, but your feelings are your responsibility. It's a shame that they can admit that your feelings are your responsibility and then go on to assume every man has to make every woman feel safe.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 03:28 PM
1

See, I really don't view this sort of thing as a problem, though a lot of people don't seem to be able to differentiate between an amusing fantasy and reality.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:40 PM
6

Well of course, feminists have been very vocal about the belief that facts are rigidly set, therefore masculine, and get in the way of feelings, which they claim are feminine and more important.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 10:53 AM
4

I love how they spin this shit now. It's not "positive discrimination towards women", it's discrimination against men to favor women.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:44 PM
4

Really though, it's like saying "illegal music and movie sharing is still a thing, so let's shut down Universal".
/r/MensRights30/01/14 09:40 PM
5

Well I'll be damned. The psychology of feminism explained.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 03:43 PM
14

Since 2003, prostitution in New Zealand has been decriminalized, with brothels licenced, yet more violence is reported to police than before. Well no shit there are going to be more reports of violence if the victims aren't going to be locked up when they report it. This doesn't mean there's more violence. I'm not sure if she's intentionally misleading people or if she's really just this goddamned retarded.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 03:38 PM
1

I seriously want to cunt-punt this woman so hard you'd call it a 50 yard field goal. The insinuation that you can choose your sexual orientation, especially for political reasons, is so ludicrous that it hurts. I mean, I'm not gay, but I'm bi (or pan or whatever you call it), and to say that who I or anyone is attracted to is a choice is fucking wrong.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:57 PM
1

She links to her facebook on her blog and it says "In a relationship with", so I'll go with yes.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 04:54 PM
7

Goddamn do I feel sorry for that girl's boyfriend.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 12:52 PM
1

Fuck me running, really?
/r/MensRights21/01/14 08:04 PM
2

Well, if they're there completely legit, then they have nothing to worry about. If not, then back in their own country should be far enough away from the abusive person for them.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 07:08 PM
4

Take a job in the adult industry to help pay the home bills at 18? Let's kick him out of school and make bogus accusations of threats involving weapons against him so it looks legit. Fuck that school, I hope the dude gets back in and graduates.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 07:03 PM
206

How long before feminists see the new one and say "It's all just internalized misogyny as a result of the patriarchy"?
/r/MensRights21/01/14 02:49 PM
3

That's a good way to ruin your monitor and keyboard.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 03:19 PM
10

Never forget that a response/parody exists as well from Funny Or Die https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLRu6PJtRv4
/r/MensRights20/01/14 10:39 AM
22

Your plan should be to get a lawyer if at all possible.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 03:57 PM
1

Just a reminder: the coverups conducted by the church stretch for decades and we'll probably never know the true extent to which lives have been ruined. Not saying all priests are guilty, just saying that there are a lot of instances of the church trying to cover its ass.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 02:46 AM
1

Well I suppose if there's one thing that the church knows how to do (aside from molest little boys), it's how to try and ruin everyone's fun.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 09:48 AM
2

Damn, if Lady Gaga came to my city and people tried to block her I think I would just flip out at them as much as I could. I would take air time and put out as many public ads as I could telling these people to mind their own damned business and let me and all the other fans enjoy her music in peace.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 09:15 AM
14

I don't get why people petition to get artists banned from performing in their country. If you really don't like someone, don't go see them, no one is forcing you to go. It's like last year when Chris Brown was supposed to perform in a few Canadian cities and groups of "concerned women" went on the damn rampage trying to get him dropped from the festival, which he was. People piss me off so goddamned much, it's like get the fucking sand out of your cunt and go about your own damned business.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 05:19 AM
3

You should have replied with this: http://i.imgur.com/O9Y5IwB.jpg
/r/MensRights15/01/14 03:36 AM
1

I really wish I could help you refute the claims made in this video, but my brain can't take it beyond a few minutes. I have a feeling though that what her argument boils down to is "unless the woman is dressed in a full parka and ski pants suit and there is not text that could in any way be interpreted as being sexual, it's sexual objectification".
/r/MensRights15/01/14 03:18 AM
1

Female privilege is now male privilege... What? Is this a troll or is this bitch serious? Does she not know that women and children were first because the children were the next generation and women could carry that next generation so men vlaued them more than themselves. It wasn't because "women were seen as childlike in their usefulness".
/r/MensRights13/01/14 01:30 PM
-1

Yeah, you know why I use the term "fat fuck"? It's because I'm so damned sick of people saying "oh, you're not fat, you're husky/big-boned/big/jolly/other-sugar-coated-bullshit-of-the-day". I've had all that said to me and I find it ridiculous that other people feel the need to make excuses for me about something that is 100% my fault.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 10:15 PM
0

Trust me, I know all about using food for comfort. You normally don't get to close to 300 pounds without knowing it all too well. The idea though that I can't point out the truth is bullshit. If someone is a fat fuck, I can say they're a fat fuck. Why do people always hear the truth and think "oh, that's insulting"? I will not sugar coat the truth, because then some fat fuck like me will try to eat it too.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 09:52 PM
38

I really hate these things that basically say "you can't call anyone a fat fuck". Why can't I call someone a fat fuck? I'm a fat fuck, I admit it. I'm not overly proud of it, but I can still take someone calling me a fat fuck, because it's the truth. If you can't handle someone calling you a fat fuck the best thing to do is to LOSE SOME DAMNED WEIGHT! People need to stop being so sensitive to the truth.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 01:45 PM
32

Infant circumcision is what we're against, not people making informed choices about their own body. Also, the loss of sensitivity reported later in life after infant circumcision could be due to the fact that baby boys don't have a foreskin that has completely detached from the head of the penis, and cutting it off would do more nerve damage than the removal of a fully detached foreskin later in life.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:00 PM
2

Which is a very blunt and honest definition of feminism.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:28 AM
15

This is the most honest I've ever seen a feminist be about feminism. She actually said it's ok to not be a feminist, good to work on men's issues (a feminist even admitting men have issues at all is rare), and flat out states that feminism is only about equality for women and accepting that it' not a whole egalitarian concept. She's far from spot on, but it's a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 07:36 PM
6

Damn, she really doesn't get it, does she? I have to wonder though how "the genders should show respect", as if respect is some nondeductible primary and not something to be earned.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 01:44 AM
66

Should have told her "sure, I'll be a 'real man' right after you be a 'real woman' and make me a sammich, cupcake". See if she can figure out the sexism then.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:30 AM
2

Nope. I think this one is one of those "logic has failed, now we have pure logic unencumbered by facts and rationality" people.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:23 AM
10

In your scenario the man still wanted to have sex to come off as straight and the woman wants to because she wants to seem "normal" in her mind. No one is forcing them to have sex, they are doing of their own free will for their own reasons.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 06:12 PM
10

But if both people are having sex, even as a result of "social coercion", then both of them wanted sex. I have sex with my girlfriend for different reasons. I do it because I enjoy it, because I want to please her, because I had a rough week and want to have intimate human contact and an orgasm, the list goes on. Your reasons for wanting sex can be shaky, but it still comes down to you wanting sex.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 05:38 PM
13

For those who can't make it through this video for fear that your brain may implode from the stupidity, I'll give you a brief run down. Gives a rundown of society in a "base-superstructure" model. Falsely asserts that the U.S. and the west in general are capitalist societies. We live in a rape culture which springs from our "capitalist" base. In order to understand the issue at hand we need to view all heterosexual relations in the contexts of sexism and rape culture. Women (especially young wom…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 05:33 PM
3

Then your expectations of someone trying to defend (mostly) the original article are far too high.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 05:11 PM
1

Damn, that lady sure is a class act...
/r/MensRights04/01/14 10:47 PM
2

Maybe not, but the jews have probably the second worst god as shown through actions of the torah and the ot. The only one that is worse that I've seen is allah. And yeah, I get that jewish circumcision of an infant at 8 days is a religious thing with it meant to fulfill part of the covenant with god and also give jewish men a sense of belonging, but you need to understand something. Your right to religious freedom and expression ends at another persons body. Otherwise what would stop religious w…
/r/MensRights04/01/14 12:06 PM
1

I'd have a man cave, but my girlfriend would use it a hell of a lot more than I would. I just need somewhere where I can jam on my bass and I'm fine.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 12:47 AM
9

Parents make irreversible decisions in the best interests of their children all the time – whether it’s schooling, where they live or who they play with. Yes, schooling and taking an interest in who your child play with are on the same level as chopping off a piece of his penis... What the fuck is wrong with these people? I mean, I get it, if you believe in an invisible man in the sky who will torture you for all eternity, you're not all there, but this has to cross over into the realm of crimin…
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:54 PM
15

I love the clusterfuck going on over in r/australia over this. People saying this man should rot in prison and then when it is pointed out that circumcision of baby boys is done and no one bats an eye, out come the screeching choir of "FGM is so much worse and don't try to derail this here's some bullshit statistic and quote with no reference or data presented".
/r/MensRights03/01/14 06:45 AM
3

At least these trolls are becoming more well spoken. Aside from that, please stop trying to troll.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 07:10 PM
3

Isn't it cute how they keep making new accounts?
/r/MensRights27/12/13 03:01 AM
2

Oh look, it's the latest troll. Hi troll.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 02:22 AM
1

Well AlphaWookie, I would just like to say I'm sorry. XD
/r/MensRights24/12/13 10:51 AM
5

And here I thought I (as a man) hated giving gifts because it's an all around stressful endeavor. I didn't know it was because I had a penis.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 09:33 PM
118

Sometimes I think 'radical feminists' who claim that a woman who remains in a relationship with a man is feeding into the patriarchy has just never had a decent dicking. This is my favorite quote of all time. Keep this one around and treat her right damnit.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 09:28 PM
1

So only women can be positive role models for girls? Isn't that just sexism?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 10:59 PM
2

Never have I saw a liberal news source not whine about some form of privilege or another. You might be S.O.L.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 11:41 PM
2

I'm thoroughly convinced this woman has no mind of her own and is just parroting feminist dogma. While the vast majority of her post is false drivel, there is one thing that really caught my eye: Rape: The statistics on rape are so depressing just reading about them will destroy a bit of your soul. Only one percent of rapes results in conviction. She doesn't seem to understand the difference between rape and a rape accusation. Not all rapes that are reported are true. Some that go unpunished mig…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:28 PM
25

It may all be bad but the rape of women and children are on a completely different level of someone raping an adult male. No it is fucking not. This piece of human filth needs to go rot in a goddamned hole somewhere. It doesn't matter if you're physically forced, psychologically forced, economically forced, or anything else. Your age doesn't matter. Your sex doesn't matter. What matters is that you were forced to preform some form of sexual act without your consent. Why is this such a goddamned …
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:50 PM
13

Didn't you get the memo? Women are strong and independent in every way, except when something goes wrong (real or imagined). Everything negative that happens to women is the fault of men. If women are shitty to each other it's just internalized misogyny from patriarchal indoctrination. One man hates on women, blame all men. One woman hates on women, blame all men. It'd be funny if wasn't so goddamned depressing.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 11:27 PM
15

Hello, and welcome to 1984...
/r/MensRights17/12/13 11:23 PM
2

It's cosmo, you can't expect any semblance of reality or any real critical thinking. I also love how they can group all men together and think it's fine but when women are grouped together it's the worst bloody thing since the holocaust (unless of course it's cosmo grouping women together, in which case they know what's best for women).
/r/MensRights16/12/13 01:59 AM
2

I got 60 and laughed my ass off.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 09:41 AM
7

Actually, yes. If you don't agree with them then you're a misogynist asshole who hates all women and deserves to die. If you agree with them then you're mansplaining to them and just trying to get into women's pants, and therefore a misogynist asshole who thinks women are there just for your pleasure. If you pay no attention to them becasue they'll hate you either way, you're a misogynist asshole who thinks women shouldn't have an opinion. You can't agree, you can't disagree, and you can't ignor…
/r/MensRights11/12/13 12:52 PM
2

Well we can see how well that's working out. If she's tenured then they can't fire her even though that would probably constitute a hostile environment.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 10:27 AM
70

Oh wow, she's actually serious, isn't she? This is the point where this professor should be fired and have her credentials stripped from her.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:01 AM
3

I got to where it was going through the movies and video games that still "need to change". I'll say it, fuck them, I like tits and ass in games, movies and advertisements. They need to get over themselves and realize not every little thing is going to cater to them. They need to sit the fuck down, shut the fuck up, and let me enjoy my scantily clad men and women in peace.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:19 PM
3

What the law should reflect is that either parent can absolve themselves of any responsibility to a child they do not want.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 09:42 PM
2

Why would I have a duty to a child that I didn't want and/or was tricked into? That's not noble, that's called being a damned sucker.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 08:53 PM
8

I'm with you. If someone ever tried to corner me into some obligation that I didn't want to be a part of, I'd walk away. Leave nothing left for them to loot from me. If I could escape the country, great. If I couldn't, I would not go to prison for excercising my right to choose. I'd sooner shoot myself. In fact, that would be an option, depending on how spiteful I felt.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:00 PM
19

Wow, now I'm slightly more ashamed to be Canadian.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 02:55 PM
19

Of course not. Lulu is for calling men whores, not women.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 01:50 PM
8

There is justice when one trusts the word of survivors without challenging them to prove “beyond a reasonable doubt” that their rape was an “actual rape.” I thought you needed to be intelligent to get into an Ivy League School. I also thought you weren't allowed to do drugs while in said schools. Good sweet damn was I mistaken.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 01:30 AM
20

I love my girlfriend's reaction to this idea. She agrees that is a person is passed out drunk that's a no go unless consent is given beforehand, but she finds it insulting that if she has a bit to drink she needs to be treated as a child. Honestly who can blame her?
/r/MensRights08/12/13 04:14 PM
2

Good job, sir, for making me laugh.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 01:19 PM
15

Dear god, I read that entire thing. Every line on every page. My eyes now hate me. Why does she think that marketing to women is sexist? Maybe BIC went around asking women what colour pens they liked. Maybe they just decided one day to do "pens for her". Who cares? Marketing to a certain demographic isn't sexist anymore that marketing deodorant towards a single sex is.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 12:15 AM
2

Your penis is you? Well at least that seems to stand up to the evidence that you're a dick. When someone says large or small penis, it's usually in relation to either the average dick size or how it looks in comparison to some other object. I'm happy I can say I have a penis that is above the national average of 5.5".
/r/MensRights28/11/13 03:28 PM
21

Because it's against the evil white men, who we all know are collectively responsible for every bad thing to ever happen from slavery and genocides to the lightbulb in your bathroom dying. It's obviously justified. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:59 AM
37

I don't even know where to begin on something like this. It's just so racists and misandrist that to try and refute every point would be an act against your sanity.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:50 AM
7

From a quick glance around the net, I don't think it is. There are stories and videos of him saying this stuff.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:47 AM
2

But I bet it will be perfectly fine when the child is older and wants to play with "action figures".
/r/MensRights22/11/13 12:54 PM
1

You deal with the promise of a story but end up not getting one? How horrible.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:09 PM
-7

So it's now disgusting to call someone honey or say they're beautiful if you don't know them? Good goddamn, these people don't even know how to handle general kindness or innocent complements.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 07:39 PM
3

I don't... What? I know they like the "everything is the fault of men" stance, but this is just so out there I can't wrap my brain around it.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 02:23 PM
1

Ah, my apology for misunderstanding. Though destroying it would be bad in case a retrial needed to take place.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 02:23 PM
1

I was under the impression that if there were a police raid and they found CP then they would look through all evidence and use it against the owner in trial.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 10:52 AM
2

I mean all rape. I assume what you meant was that some things that are classified as rape aren't as bad as other thing that are classified as rape, but dear lord, the way you phrased it made me flash back to Animal Farm. When I say rape, I mean any sexual act that has either been denied, not given consent to, or the person is incapacitated in a manner that makes consent not possible.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:38 AM
1

Except in the case where the video is used as evidence against the perpetrator of the crime.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 12:50 AM
10

I'm surprised this is going through. Sure, rape is a horrible thing, but people do have rape fantasies. People who act in those films probably do, and it's a safe environment to express it.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 03:34 PM
3

Either use vids from GWW or articles from Judgy Bitch to help your point. Perhaps point out the actual definition of misandry. Also, cracked isn't a news site, nor is it meant to be taken in any serious fashion.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 06:14 AM
2

Sometimes I think it's best to think back to the words of Forrest Gump, "stupid is as stupid does", realize you can't change these minds, and move on.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 04:50 AM
26

We don't overlook the issues that women face. Most, if not all of us, are egalitarian in views from what I've seen. It's just that this is a space dedicated to the discussion of men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 04:48 AM
3

I love the mentality of "We shouldn't need to learn to defend ourselves because bad things shouldn't happen". These people need to get out of their little bubble and realize that shit happens and blaming an entire group of people for the acts of a few is a very stunted approach to these issues.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 04:40 AM
2

There are certain words that are applied to women specifically in order to manipulate them into compliance: "slut," "bitch," "ugly/fat" and, of course, "crazy." I use all of these words, not just towards women. Possibly the two greatest tidbits of advice I've ever gotten were "bitches are crazy" from my mom and "don't stick it in the crazy" from my brother (who my mom agreed with). But if someone is being a slut, call them a slut. If they're being a bitch then tell them. People can be and are fa…
/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:35 AM
4

So they linked pole dancing to the sex industry and banned it? In that case, I suppose the next logical question is why is the sex industry a bad thing? Men and women get paid, sometimes extraordinarily well, for either just being nude and posing or fucking on film. That's not wrong or exploitative, that's providing a very desired service.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 11:22 AM
0

Just because the law says something doesn't mean it's right or true. Marijuana is illegal but it's less harmful than alcohol or cigs. Cause a shitstorm over it. Make it viral.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:47 PM
1

Bring it up to the school and email the publisher. That shit won't fly.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 09:23 AM
3

Remember, we have to teach young boys to put women on a pedestal, treat them as equals, that women are strong and independent, that women deserve to be taken care of, and that women are all around perfect and an example of model behavior, while teaching young girls that if something goes wrong it's a man's fault.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 12:47 AM
1

Sadly, some of them actually are.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 10:25 PM
5

From the comments: Kevin ON: "So if I believe in positive discrimination and women should have more opportunities than men to make up for centuries of disadvantage I'm not a feminist then?" Replied to by another with: Davaldod: "No, you are still a feminist. In some cases, "positive discrimination" would be in support of the goal of equal rights and opportunities for both men and women. Therefore, you remain a feminist." Yep, "positive discrimination" supports the goals of equal rights because o…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 01:28 AM
2

It's an honest name though. We're men's rights activists, we want equal rights for men. There's no misinterpretation, no smokescreen, no "oh well that's not what men's rights means to me" stuff. It's honest and direct.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 11:40 AM
1

Actually, I'd argue that while the business owners have a slightly better hand, both sides need each other. The employer needs the employees to do the work, make the products, clean, maintain equipment, and so on. The employee needs the employer to earn a living.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 09:51 AM
1

How's it a threat if you say "if you don't work for your living you're probably going to starve"? And how is it "economic violence"? The fact is you have to earn what you want or need, it's not just going to be handed to you by the grace of your existence.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 07:42 PM
1

A better way to go would be to get out of the "we want more from you so we'll take it by force" mentality. Some companies would do it, some wouldn't. You could either stay at the company that wouldn't or you could try your luck at getting hired at the better company. No mess, no fuss, no government coercion or blood spilled.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 07:37 PM
1

I will point out that my ethics are not arbitrary, as arbitrary is defined as "based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system". My ethics and morals are not based on random, personal whim, they are based on rational thought and conclusions based on the premise that people should be able to act according to their best interests so long as harm comes to no one else as a direct result of their actions. How would the ideas I support cause suffering? And I am not dangerous …
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:47 PM
2

I don't even live in the US... but enlighten me, how do other countries pay for it?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 12:28 PM
2

Of course force works, but it's not right. If people want to try and force and employer to give them payed paternity or maternity leave and the employer doesn't want to then the employee can go pound sand. There's a word for people who take others money by force, we call them thieves. If something is sound ethically but it doesn't work in the outside world, then it's not my head that needs to be changed, it's the outside world that does. Don't take things as they are. Don't say "well that's just…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 12:00 PM
2

So rather than each company deciding for itself if it wants to or can provide this service, you want the government to step in and force them to, never mind the fact that it would cripple small businesses and there are a lot of people who would have no problem exploiting this system. Get the workers and the bosses together or get the management's attention and say "hey, is there any way we could get paid time off in case we have a kid?" If it's a no, then start saving some money and take as much…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:11 AM
-1

Get a movement going that pushes for individual business to grant paid paternity leave and maternity leave, but don't go for government force.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 12:35 AM
0

No, but government institutions have rules too. You can't go into any facility run by the government wearing something overly offensive. They can't tell you what to say elsewhere, but on government property, they make the rules.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 03:48 PM
-1

I'm kind of torn on this one. On the one hand, I support breast cancer awareness. On the other hand, the school should be able to decide what it considers inappropriate on school grounds (which needs to be enforced at more schools, coming from my time at a ghetto-ass school with ghetto-ass people and girls dressing like sluts). On the third hand though, or fourth hand, any hand, third leg, ect... I too heart boobies.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 12:51 PM
14

I would assume somewhere in the middle.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 02:20 AM
945

Tell them you identify as a woman just to fuck with them.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 12:29 AM
1

I can really only go from what I've seen. One night I was at a party with some friends and we were all drinking vodka. One friend was loaded off his ass after a few drinks, and if he were any thinner you'd get a paper cut if you touched him. I had probably as much as he had to drink and I wasn't even buzzed. He was short and skinny, I'm 6'5" and 300 pounds, and neither of us have much muscle.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 05:08 PM
2

In a historical context, it's not really good to go blackface, but this woman was doing it for a costume for a character she liked. Perhaps she hadn't realized because blackface isn't really a thing thats done or talked about much anymore. It's not like she intended to be racist. She didn't do it and go out shouting "ooga booga massa said he gon give me some watahmellon and chicken". People need a bit more of a grip and look at context.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 12:47 PM
1

It's like parents stopped teaching their children to be safe. When I was little my parents taught me to always be cautious and aware because bad stuff can happen at any time. What happened to that?
/r/MensRights28/10/13 12:29 PM
1

Remember, every woman deserves to be safe at all times but it's up to men to keep them safe from everyone and everything, including that womans own bad decisions.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 12:04 PM
4

I've tried to argue this point before online and it's absolutely mad, the amount of hate you get. You say women are on average smaller than men or the said smaller body mass might affect the amount of alcohol they can consume before becoming impaired and no one bats an eye. You say women should be more aware of the amount of alcohol they drink, where they are and with whom and every feminist comes out of the woodwork, calling rape apologist, rapist, typical man, ect...
/r/MensRights28/10/13 11:15 AM
2

If they hit you first with intent to harm hit them back. Gender is not a consideration here. If you are attacked, attack back. That right there is self defense. And make it a good one so they'll think twice before trying it again.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 02:29 AM
3

If you would actually read my comment you will see the following: If anyone, man or woman, hits you with the intent to harm you, you hit back, and you hit hard enough to end that shit right then and there. That is literally the first sentence. Someone hits you with intent to harm you, you hit back, hard enough to teach them to not do it again. Man or woman, it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:57 AM
8

If anyone, man or woman, hits you with the intent to harm you, you hit back, and you hit hard enough to end that shit right then and there. Even if it doesn't hurt, you need to show that that kind of shit just doesn't fly. Now, I'm not saying that a woman slapping you warrants putting them through a table or some shit, but if they slap you, you better leave them with the memory that makes them not do it again.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:59 PM
5

Get rid of alimony all together. There is no reason a person should be forced to pay for another grown adult.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 08:34 PM
3

Man, those always get me right in the feels, especially the missing your old friends one.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 09:47 AM
1

See, I think that's where you're being a bit unfair. It can be a negatively viewed choice but I wouldn't go so far as to call it bad. At that point it's more of just another weird body modification.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 09:05 AM
1

When it fails, women will play the victim card again and blame men for not fixing it, just like they always do when the "gurrl power" play isn't an option.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:52 AM
1

their female colleagues can take most of the credit for driving the compromise that is expected to temporarily reopen the U.S. government and raise the debt ceiling before Thursday's deadline. Not an MR point, but isn't the point of a "debt ceiling" to be a point where the government stops spending money because it would no longer be viable? What's the point of it if the government can just arbitrarily raise it?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:51 AM
1

Really, if it needs to be removed for medical reasons is it still bad? Is it bad if some dude wants it gone for personal reasons, even though no one else is affected? Yes, both articles were misrepresented and quotes taken out of context. If I'm wrong, point out where in the articles I've fallen off the rails in my logic.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:27 AM
1

No, we're talking about circumcision and painting it as a wholly bad thing no matter the circumstance. Seriously, miracleriver misrepresented both articles posted and you're here flying off the handle at every little bit.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 12:03 AM
1

How about we argue for circumcision if it's something a legal adult wants to do to their own body, no matter how foolish those reasons may be?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 10:40 PM
1

Guess what, some people like men who are circumcised. Get over it. If someone wants to do it for whatever reason, being medical, religious, or they or their partner finds it more aesthetically pleasing, then it's fine if they're of age.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 12:27 PM
1

Well, the end bit of the posted title is taken out of context, it is a bit from the bottom of the article about what the majority of women think about foreskin, and the entire blurb does mean that to most women it doesn't matter if you're cut or not so long as it's clean and you can use it well. Tell me where I've fallen off the path.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 10:44 AM
0

What the hell am I in denial about? Yes, I understand the importance of a foreskin, I agree that forced removal is genital mutilation of an infant, I think it's a completely barbaric thing to do to someone who has no choice, and I'm still very much intact. Go on, tell me what I'm in denial about.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 10:40 AM
-2

Seriously, what part are you not getting?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 09:41 AM
-1

Is it because I used the word "just"? How about if I said that the foreskin is a flap of skin that has significant importance to the overall health of a normally functioning penis? Does that sound better?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 09:39 AM
1

And if you did it of your own free will for any reason, you have my support. If it were as an infant, then I feel sorry your choice was taken from you, but respect your acceptance of what has been done.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:35 AM
-4

Oh hey look, it's time for "lets bash people for something they probably had no control over"! As a man, I am well aware of the functions of my still intact foreskin. But guess what? Some people have preferences. That's never going to change.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:03 AM
-5

First, congratulations, you can use the copy/paste function of a computer. Second, there is absolutely nothing there that is against anything I said. Yes, the foreskin is just a flap of skin, but it's a flap of skin with an important purpose. Never once did I say I was in support of it. Try reading.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 02:57 AM
-4

And again, out of context. Yes, the foreskin is a tiny flap of skin. Just because of this fact doesn't mean it's not important. Both articles you've posted seem to actually be genuinely helpful and informative for someone who wants to know the pros and cons of foreskin and how to maintain penile health.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 01:45 AM
-5

Taken a little out of context there, no? Where it says "a penis is a penis is a penis. Fore-skinned or not" is at the very end in the section about what girls think about it. It's meant as it makes no difference to most women what it looks like as long as it's clean and you're good.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 01:42 AM
1

But they didn't build it, and they didn't pay for it. According to you, that means they didn't earn it. So it's stolen. No, they didn't build the earth, therefore even if you found a new place, settled there, and used your hard work to cultivate the land, use what's there, and built it up from raw materials, it's not yours because every single thing is stolen because ownership is only possible by collective will. And that means that the first person that comes along has a special right to it, an…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:31 PM
-1

If you have insurance that covers birth control then that's fine. What I'm arguing against is forcing employers to cover birth control in their policies because it may conflict with their beliefs (however ridiculous they may be). My stance here is strictly against force. It's not right to force people to pay for something if they don't want to. It's wrong to threaten someone with fines and jail for not adopting your stance on an issue. Right isn't determined by a gun.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 01:39 PM
1

The original land owners were the people who settled the land first. They claimed the wilderness and through their hard work tamed it. No one built the earth, it was just part of the randomness that is the creation/destruction cycle of the universe. As for your car bit, I can answer that quite simply. A person who discovered or bought a piece of land opens a car factory. He purchases everything he may need from other people. He then gets people to build the cars for him in exchange for money, an…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 04:17 AM
1

Alright. So tell me who had the right to sell the earth to its current owners. Is it the people who built it? Remind me who built the earth, because I can't remember who they were. As the dominant species on earth, we developed the systems that best suit our needs. The concept was created by humans. some bizarre lunacy about work and entitlement. Yes, working for what you want and having a right to what you earn is "bizarre lunacy". I'm talking about a legal and social framework in which nearly …
/r/MensRights14/10/13 02:38 AM
1

You didn't answer the question. If you buy stolen goods, do they become yours or not? If not, why not - didn't you pay for them? You said that was enough. Ok, let me rephrase, as I thought this was obvious. No, if you buy something from someone who stole the goods to begin with, they are not yours, as they had no right to sell them. You are legally obligated to return the stolen goods to the rightful owner and the thief must return your money and pay for their crime. It's self-evident. What do y…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 01:01 AM
-1

Yes, it's silly and extreme, but the point is force isn't right, and you don't gain the right to force because you have a larger gang or a gun.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 12:36 AM
-1

I respond with silly to silly. Force is never right, regardless of some ill-defined "greater good".
/r/MensRights14/10/13 12:32 AM
-2

Even if you've bought, say, stolen goods? If it were stolen goods then the person has no right to sell it and both the person they stole it from and I have legal options against the thief. Nope. It comes from the use or threat of violence. Nothing else. Provide some proof of this. I assume you own some clothing, so who did you beat up and steal them from? No, only the people with property, and the less property you have, the less protection you get. Almost everyone has at least some sort of prop…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 12:28 AM
-4

Just because something is law doesn't make it right, does it? If a law was passed tomorrow saying that all men need to be castrated, it still wouldn't be right.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 12:23 AM
-4

What part of "most basic function" don't you get? At the base they both prevent pregnancy when they function. You're dancing around my main point, being you don't have a right to force someone else to do something if they don't want to.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 12:01 AM
0

If I work, earn money, and buy something, it's mine. If someone doesn't want to sell something to me I can't force them to because it's theirs, just like they can't force me to buy it because my money is mine. Property doesn't come from a false sense of entitlement, it comes from a positive sense of entitlement stemming from my work to earn it. Such property rights are enforced by law to protect all people from thieves.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 11:48 PM
-3

Their most basic function is the same, and the point is that it's not right to force someone else to finance them for you. Force does not equal a right.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 11:42 PM
-4

Yes, but this is about trying to force employers to pay for birth control through insurance even if it conflicts with their beliefs. If you want birth control and it's not covered, buy it yourself. You don't have a right to force your employer to outright pay for it.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 11:34 PM
-1

So then your stance is that it is moral and right to force something on someone and steal their money for it just because it might affect you? What is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights13/10/13 11:31 PM
1

Bottom line, if a girl is intoxicated she cannot consent to sex and you could be charged with rape. It does not matter whether you knew she was intoxicated, it doesn’t matter if you were intoxicated too, all that matters is that she was not in a state of mind to consent and therefore it is rape. This is the stupidity laid bare for all to see. If a woman is drunk, she's not at all responsible for her actions, but any and all men are responsible for not only their own actions, but the woman's acti…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 11:17 PM
-3

A: Not a libertarian, though they make good points now and then. I don't align myself with any party and instead base my votes on the party stance, policies, and track record. B: Yes, I am a big fan of property rights, as that's how I have a roof over my head, clothes on my back, and am able to reply on my tablet. I'm not sure how your comment plays into what I said though. Please elaborate.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 11:11 PM
-4

Ok, it is an unfair comparison, but if anyone, man or woman wanted to get free birth control, I'd call them a slut. If someone expects something at another person's expense I'm not going to have a kind word for them. You don't see men going around saying their condoms should be payed for by someone else, and if you did, you'd laugh at them, and rightly so.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 10:49 PM
-3

Ok, it's possible, but it's wrong. It is immoral and vile to force something on another person. It's equally vile to take from a person what they do not wish to give. It's an assault on liberty and it's theft, and it's made worse by the fact that it's made legal by moronic politicians.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 08:15 PM
-7

The Affordable Care Act is a joke, and that's coming from a Canadian. You can't force people to buy insurance, and you can't force businesses to pay for medical care if the person in charge doesn't agree. If you want birth control, buy it like everyone else. Set aside your own earned money, and if you can't then don't be a goddamned slut.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 05:33 PM
6

A ban on male circumcision would be antisemitic. How could it not be? The Council of Europe's recent decree on children's rights contained some good, kind ideals – and some revolting comparisons of male circumcision with female genital mutilation. That's as far as I could get before I wanted to puke/smash her face in with a brick. Is she retarded? Seriously, does she need a helmet to go outside and water wings to eat soup? A ban on MGM would technically be antisemitic, but if part of your religi…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:05 AM
10

Well, it is a men's issue, and a women's issue, as both can be sexist and experience sexism.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 07:05 PM
9

I don't know, even the "I want him to look like his father" argument is creepy. Why would a parent even care what it looks like? It's not like the parent is the one who's going to be using it. And what guy is going to look down at his dick one day and think "thank god I look just like my dad"?
/r/MensRights07/10/13 10:53 PM
36

Glad I'm not the only one that bugs. Women are smaller on average so they can't hold their booze as well and instead of getting women to be more responsible, you're leaving it in the hands of other intoxicated people. No way that could possibly go wrong...
/r/MensRights07/10/13 10:49 PM
8

This is true, but it doesn't really inspire confidence, does it?
/r/MensRights06/10/13 12:32 AM
2

My only gripes would be that, first and foremost, the "Don't Be THAT Guy" campaign was a horrible anti-men mess (that poster being the one semi-decent misstep in a direction closer to right), and second being the bit about rape jokes. Sure, they're not wonderful, they're actually really dark, but joking is how society gets through the issues that aren't generally talked about. Take for example "How many police officers does it take to change a lightbulb? None, they just beat the room for being b…
/r/MensRights06/10/13 12:30 AM
11

Yeah, but it's a terrible start, like starting a race and tripping over your own shoelaces.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 12:11 AM
9

It's a matter of bodily autonomy. Circumcision is mutilation of the genitals which can cause infection, deformation of the skin, severe blood loss, and death. It's also not just Jews who do it, but even if it were, it's an issue that should be left to the person when they're of legal age.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 01:29 AM
3

If an employer doesn't want to include birth control or anything else in their company's healthcare, what right does the government have to force them?
/r/MensRights02/10/13 10:22 AM
1

Personally, I prefer to pay. Might be a bit out of the times, especially since splitting the bill is something my parents did, but I don't want my girlfriend to have to do anything. If I could get a job that paid well enough that I could take care of both of us, I'd be happy. That's not to say I wouldn't want her to work or pay for some of her won stuff, but I feel like I should be able to take care of her.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 12:26 AM
4

I find it funny that when they say that we have a rape culture because men accused of rape are set free. Not men CONVICTED, but those who are only accused. This means they want all men even accused of rape to be locked up without trial. So much for innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:39 AM
1

Tell them to prove for patriarchy. That's all, and you'll catch them with their pants down.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 12:05 PM
1

Never once on this sub have I seen MRAs refer to feminists as inhuman or demonize them. I could have missed it, but all I've seen has been people pointing out the evils of feminist dogma and the actions of feminists that try to shut down MRA voices and events, sometimes doing so in a violent manner. They demonize men and our sexuality at every turn, trying to portray us as evil, demons, unfeeling, and natural born rapists, so yes, there will be backlash to that, but calling a moron a moron is ha…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:25 AM
11

Man, I've been cursed out for holding a door open, given looks for offering to take my girlfriends bags for her, and for refusing to give up my seat on a bus for a perfectly healthy woman. I've seen campaign after campaign, both in my home city and elsewhere in the western world, that either demonize or marginalize men and boys. I've had conversations completely shut down by feminists who do the equivalency of sticking their fingers in their ears while shouting "lalalala rape culture lalalala pa…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 03:15 AM
1

Oh look, posters that throw around statistics without any study to back them up. Violence against women is telling sexist jokes, controlling and belittling her, judging her by how she looks. So even if I tell a joke that's sexist against men, it's still violence towards women? Fuck that, I'll tell sexist jokes all I want when I want, because for a lot of people, jokes are the only way to openly deal with otherwise taboo topics, like sexism, racism, rape, ect... If someone is being stupid I'm goi…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 04:46 PM
6

Before we can even address the issue of difference in sentencing for men and women, I think it would be more important to fix the laws themselves. There are so many laws on the books right now that are so blatantly unjust it's enough to make your head spin. Then once the laws are fixed we can say "ok, now we have to look at reasonable sentences, as well as being innocent until proven guilty".
/r/MensRights27/09/13 11:55 PM
2

Now I know one more state to not go to if I ever venture south of the border.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 10:55 AM
1

I love funny sarcasm in the morning. Thanks for a laugh.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 10:54 AM
-1

Another great video by Craig Biddle. The sad part is that a lot of people see justice as the problem and social justice as the only way to be fair. We've seen it before where legitimate movements for justice were turned into "social justice" evil. Look at the civil rights movement, which started out as blacks and other logical people saying "hey, these people deserve the same rights we have" but out of that sprang up groups like the black panther which advocated racial quotas and favors from the…
/r/MensRights22/09/13 08:42 PM
9

How does one destroy an idea that is so laughably false yet people believe with a vigor reminiscent of religious zealots? You can point out a falsehood until you're blue in the face, and we may be able to educate the young, but the people who refuse to see reason will not change their views. They will be dust before reason pierces their minds. Also I would like to point out that feminism is the pillar that holds up all the anti-man policies and social ills.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:01 PM
10

But the feminist ideology is at the root of most anti-man news stories and government policies, so the purveyors of this ideology need to be fought at every turn on an ideological level. The quickest way for evil to win is for good men to say nothing.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 11:54 AM
3

I agree that people with differing values can be good, but completely opposite views are usually a no go zone. If you and a buddy are hanging out and get ice cream and you get a chocolate while he gets a vanilla is fine because people have tastes or you two want to catch a movie but you dislike what he picks and vice-versa that's cool too, but if you're gay you wouldn't go chumming around with someone who thinks gays are an abomination and should be shot, would you?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:21 AM
8

I don't follow her logic. You send links with relevant information on a debate to which she replies to with silence yet you're the one who doesn't want dialog? Honestly, I say good riddance to bad news. Would you really want to be friends with someone who's values are the direct opposite to your own?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:26 AM
11

Oh no, you're allowed to have opinions, but you have to be told what your opinion is by a woman just so you don't end up raping anyone with your hateful man-words.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 10:49 PM
3

That made me laugh so hard I couldn't breathe.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:53 PM
8

I get that kind of shit a lot, even here.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 05:08 PM
6

What about the men who don't want to get married? Even with the wonderful girlfriend I have had for the past three years, marriage is still a very threatening idea to me based on how badly it can backfire.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 01:39 PM
52

Noticed it on several occasions. I once go into an argument in their comments where I was basically told that men's rights are a joke, the MHRM is a hate group, and feminism is going to solve all our problems. I try to avoid those articles now. EDIT* Here's a little picture from Cracked that really relates to this. http://i.crackedcdn.com/phpimages/article/2/0/1/184201.jpg?v=1
/r/MensRights18/09/13 10:48 AM
1

Well... Yes and no. Bill C-304 repealed the hate speech laws of the Canadian Human Rights Act, they still exist in the Canadian Criminal Code.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:20 AM
2

The fact that Canada has hate speech laws at all is a point to how far it's progressed, since such laws are in direct conflict with Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 01:54 AM
3

Sadly I am but an unemployed college student. If not for this, then I would indeed. At present, I am confined to simply speaking out against feminist propaganda online or in small groups. Also, if someone were caught putting these up around town, I think they'd probably be brought up on charges of hate speech.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 12:23 AM
3

Hopefully it makes it's way over to Halifax. With all the campaigns here that either cast women as perpetual victims or men as the only aggressors, you know we need it.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 10:56 PM
1

Well then great, we can own something without actually having ownership rights to it. Can you see anything wrong with that at all?
/r/MensRights16/09/13 11:03 PM
1

If I made a digital file and sent it to you as a gift, it is a gift. It is yours and you should be allowed to do anything you want with it, be it sharing, keeping it for yourself, or deleting it. There is no logical way that you can own something but not have the right to decide how to use it or who to share it with.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 05:18 PM
4

Doesn't Michael laxer know he should be a good little male feminist and keep his mouth shut about the issues of Womyntm ?
/r/MensRights16/09/13 04:37 PM
3

I suppose that could be just as mentally harmful.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:40 PM
5

When you wreck on of the bathrooms with the result of that burrito, tell them it's on them.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:35 PM
27

I feel for you man. Some of the best teachers I had in school growing up were men. I'm not saying the women teachers weren't just as good, but as a boy I always looked up to and connected with the male teachers better.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:45 PM
3

It's things like this that make me appreciate Ayn Rand and her philosophies even more.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:28 PM
0

No, my argument is that you can't write a law like that without infringing on personal freedoms. If someone sends a picture as a gift, then that picture is theirs to do with as they wish. If you don't like how it's being used after sending it, then you should have thought of that before sending it.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 09:33 AM
7

Women have suffered centuries of abuse. Using an argument like that is like saying "Well, blacks were enslaved by whites for more than a century, so it's not ok for a white man to defend himself from a black man." Seriously, did this woman eat lead paint chips as a kid or was she dropped on her head?
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:24 AM
1

I am A) not a U.S. citizen and B) in almost complete disagreement with copyright law as it stands today. If I own a physical copy of something, it is mine to do with as I see fit as long as I am not making a profit on illegitimate copies. I should, however, be allowed to freely share what is mine with whoever I see fit.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:11 AM
-2

There are no legal consequences for violating a "social expectation". It's a "social expectation" for me to not go wandering around in a two piece bikini since I'm a 6'5" 280 pound man, but I can if I want to without legal consequence. And what if someone sends a nude photo in good faith to someone they're dating but then they break up? Say the girl sent a photo then later cheated, since the guy's trust in the girl had been broken, all bets are off. Of course the girl could complain, but just be…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:49 AM
0

How exactly is an "implied contract" in any way legally binding?
/r/MensRights15/09/13 11:20 PM
1

Your summation bugs me a bit. You say it as though women are the only people who send nude photos and men are the only ones who are jackasses who post said photos online. If you send a photo to someone and it is now theirs, it's theirs to do with what they want unless some form of agreement has been arranged.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 11:17 PM
1

Well faith, by definition, is belief that is not based on proof. If you have no proof of your claim, then you're sticking to something based on nothing but "it makes me feel good so it is good". Is there any book aside from the bible or that doesn't use the bible as a base that talks about jesus being the son of god? You can't use the book as proof if the claim is inside said book.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 07:12 PM
1

Proving for christ is not proving for god. How do you. Know he was the son of god, aside from what the bible says? How do you know that Mary didn't just cheat on her husband and say the baby was gods to avoid being stoned to death?
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:55 PM
0

Technically, yes. The only way to avoid something is to not be in a situation where it can't happen. If you have a car, there's always the chance it can get stolen.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:52 PM
3

Yeah, I read about that case a few years ago, and it's still not sounding any less bat-shit crazy. There was no reasonable circumstance that the act that ended in pregnancy should have lead to it. The man made it clear that he didn't want children and the woman was deceitful in obtaining what she wanted. At the very least, the man shouldn't have had to pay a dime and be done with the whole thing, but remember, we're a very woman-centric society when it comes to law.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 02:52 AM
0

Well if the man orgasms inside a woman in a way that would logically cause pregnancy it is the woman's decision if she wants to keep it or not, but the man should be able to state that he does not want children and to not be tied down to one. If it were a way in which pregnancy is not a foreseeable outcome, then the man should be free and clear. In this day and age, it is logical to assume that pictures could end up online, so either sign something forbidding it or don't do it unless you have no…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 02:31 AM
1

Genesis 1:26 - Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” In the bible, god made the heavens and the earth and then all the beasts of the land, sea, and air, and then created man to have dominion over all, as man was made in his image. It clearly states all things were put here for us. A…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:34 AM
0

Yes. There is so many ways sending nude photos of yourself to someone could go wrong, regardless of any feelings for one another. You two could break up, or he could just be a dick, or they might get stolen, or a computer could be hacked and picture files stolen. Shit happens. If there's a chance that they might wind up out there and you don't want that to happen, the only guarantee is to not take them in the first place.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:22 AM
-2

Honestly, if someone sends a nude picture to another person, it's the receivers decision to put it on the net or not, unless there's some form of contract signed that states otherwise. Maybe people should, oh I don't know, grow the hell up and not do stupid shit.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 11:17 PM
1

So, because the universe is structured in such a way that allows for matter it obviously means that the universe was made by some higher being in that way for us?
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:45 PM
1

So just because the others have died out means that their invisible sky daddies are less real than your invisible sky daddy? What use is there trying to refute intellectually points based on an anti intellectual doctrine? Prove for god, then we'll talk. Until then your religion is no less hokum than the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 07:14 PM
1

The argument of "life exists therefore god" is so flawed I don't even know where to begin. Is it possible that there was something that made everything? Yes, but it's highly improbable. That said, there is no proof to support your god of the bible. There is no evidence of miracles or angels or heaven. As for those religions being of the same god, that's because they developed in roughly the same area over time. The Hindu religion has been around longer, how do you know they aren't right? What ab…
/r/MensRights14/09/13 01:22 PM
1

Prove god is real. You're the one making the claim, so back it up with some evidence. You also seem to think that just because we can't see something means it isn't real, but we know about wind, gravity, black holes, sub-atomic particles, and so on because we can observe their effects of surrounding things.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 04:33 PM
-3

Telling Atheists to accept jesus or forever burn in hell is probably not the best way to convert someone. Maybe they should be notified...
/r/MensRights12/09/13 11:15 PM
-3

Oh hey, it's this guy again. What part of "you don't have the right to force people to do business with people they don't want to do business with" didn't you get? Is racism wrong? Yes. It's highly immoral and vile and one of the worst branches of social collectivism to exist. Should you be allowed to arbitrarily force your morality on others because of what "society" thinks is right? No, as long as what someone does doesn't physically harm someone else, it's fine for private citizens.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 09:45 PM
3

I'm sorry, perhaps I should be more clear. Not allowing someone to do business with you based on race/sex/anything else is not physically harming. Emotional harm does not count, as it could be used by a majority group to silence opposition.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 03:03 AM
5

So then you hold the view that a person may hold any view they wish, but if they attempt to put it into practice in their private business the government may step in and dictate to them what they can do even if their action harms no other, am I correct?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 02:53 AM
2

People rely on privatized transportation, resulting in competition and ultimately better service. If only there were an industry we could look at to illustrate this point, such as the taxi industry.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:53 AM
6

If someone doesn't want to allow certain people into a business that he or she owns, that's their own business. No one is forcing you to go there and do business with them if you don't like their practice. No one has a right to force another person to do business with them if they don't want to. And no, I'm not saying I support racism, as I pointed out above by saying that I think discrimination based on anything a person can't change is one of the vilest points to take, but I will stand up for …
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:38 PM
11

There are lots of things that are illegal that people should be allowed to choose for themselves. For instance, smoking marijuana is illegal but people should have the right to choose what goes into their own bodies and accept the consequences of their actions. People have the right to associate with who they want and to avoid those they want in their lives, so why is it that if someone opens a business of any kind they're told that their land and their business is accessible to everyone no matt…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:51 PM
7

If it's privately owned, then legally yes, but morally no. I would never eat at a white only restaurant and would vocally condemn them for being irrational and racist, but it's their business to ruin.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:20 PM
-5

There are none to my knowledge, which is terrible. Taxes go to pay partially for public transit, which is unfair for people who don't use it.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:19 PM
40

I don't mind there being gender specific areas of any sort if they are privately owned. If, however, they are government run or subsidized then they have no right to segregate people based on gender, race, sexuality, age, or any other factor.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:37 PM
2

Not sure if she was a troll, but that picture has been circulating for a while.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:45 PM
1

Yep, men stare at a woman's tits and they're perverts, but women stare at men's pecks and abs and it's all "mhmm, you go get you a piece girlfriend".
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:44 PM
1

Oh no! People made something that others don't like! Hurry, call it sexist and harmful to children! It's offensive to our delicate little sensibilities so the creators need to passively verbally castrate themselves in an apology to everyone. People need to get over themselves. They wouldn't be crying that it's sexist if it were some women who made something called JunkStare.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:46 PM
2

And yea I would like to go back to the 20's. Men and women were happier when both sexes enjoyed their roles. Even though going back to that culture is not going to happen any time soon, that is what I want as a MRA and that is my goal and it should be any other sane persons goal too. What about those people who didn't enjoy their roles? What about the men who wanted to stay home and take care of their kids? What about the women who wanted to go and climb the corporate ladder? What if a man wante…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 01:14 PM
4

Equality means equal representation and protection under the law. If you want to live in a society where women are feminine and men are masculine, go build a time machine and go back to the 20's. People have freedom to do (for the most part) what they want and act how they want to.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 12:46 AM
2

So, because men can produce sperm every day men that get raped should get put on the back burner while women get preferential treatment, simply by virtue of their being women? I'm a man and my value isn't determined by my disposability. My value is determined in relation to my actions and the people in my life. Basically, your stance boils down to "men who get raped should man up because rape against women is somehow worse".
/r/MensRights07/09/13 12:39 AM
3

Alright, I'll put this bluntly. Are you retarded? Rape is rape, and is just as traumatizing regardless of the gender.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 11:37 PM
1

So if I went into Wal-Mart and started telling everyone that Wal-Mart is horrible and Target is better and so on and so forth and they removed me from the property, that would be censorship? Are you insane? Youtube is a private business. It has owners. It has policies on what you are allowed and not allowed to use its services for. That's not censorship, that's a reasonable rule.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 05:28 PM
0

Or... you're free to stop using Youtube. If you don't like how they do business (which you're not really paying for) then you can use one of those lower video sites. Just because they're the most popular doesn't mean they have any "public responsibilities".
/r/MensRights06/09/13 05:24 PM
2

Not when what you baked was nothing but cookies and all you sewed was this lame desk organizer.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 05:19 PM
2

I remember my junior high home-ec class. We learned how to bake cookies and sew on machines that looked like they were new in the 70's. It was basically an introduction to being a housewife, and no actually useful skills. I weep for the children 10 years from now in the public education system.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:53 PM
1

Actually, I find every day run of the mill children to have a better mentality. Feminists are more like those bratty teens who think they're princesses. It's always "no, no, no, me, me, me!" and then when you actually want them to do work they whine and complain.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:47 PM
10

Actually, on the topic of trans-rights, I've more often seen feminists mock, belittle, and abuse trans people. If you're MtF then they'll tell you to stay in your own gender, and if you're FtM you're branded a gender traitor.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 05:51 PM
12

It's the pornography thing all over again. They'll shout that porn should be banned because it harms women and objectifies the women in porn, even though they agreed to it, get paid for it, and enjoy it. If women can't actually consent to porn, then why can they consent to baking? It follows their sudo-logic quite well.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 05:48 PM
-1

Yeah, those gender neutral pronouns, gender based job quotas, and wanting a more level wage for everyone with no difference given to what they do that feminists seem to go on and on about aren't socialist notions at all. My bad dude. And it's totally not a toxic philosophy at all. Please note my heavy sarcasm. Let me tell you something about socialism. Socialism is the idea that if enough people agree, they have the right to take what isn't theirs. The only difference between socialism and commu…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 05:41 PM
5

I'm not so sure you can fix a system if it's operating as it's meant to. The public education system isn't meant to teach critical thinking and individualism, it's meant to teach memorization and conformity. Like George Carlin said, "They want obedient workers. People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork but just dumb enough to passively accept it".
/r/MensRights05/09/13 05:33 PM
11

Go for free food and try to point out that women are just as capable of rape as men.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:09 PM
70

Two issues I have with this in particular. If women are ever to solve the "women's problem," they also need to acknowledge that they can't, and shouldn't, do it alone. Men must help. Yep, men must help the poor damsel if she can't do it alone. It's our responsibility because we're men. We need to focus less of our energies on our own kids' SAT scores and more on fighting for better public schools; less time on competitive cupcake-baking and more on supporting those few brave women willing to run…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 01:59 PM
5

Next time you're in class just flip it on them. Tell them that women just naturally want sex and that she probably enjoyed it. When they get their collective panties in a bunch, explain that it's no different than if it were a man that was raped. Good goddamn I hate people like that.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 11:07 AM
1

I suppose slavery is is a more apt description of it. If ever placed in this situation, I propose a plan. If you're old and this happens, first take all your money out of the bank. Give it away, shred it, burn it, whatever. Then once that's done, if you really have nothing left, kill yourself. Normally I'm an advocate against suicide, but in this case I could see it as both a way out of a shitty situation, and a controlled end to spite the ex. Might seem harsh, but if I were old and bitter, it's…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 10:06 PM
3

I don't agree with them 100%. If a woman is 65 and divorced, sure, it's desirable for her to have some money, but is it right that a man that is no longer part of her life has to pay it? Of course not. That's legalized robbery.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 07:52 PM
3

See, I'm lucky. My girlfriend has a good head on her shoulders. She doesn't take it as I think she's incapable of doing anything if I make a meal for her, or hold the door open, or I carry her bags for her. We enjoy laughing at modern feminism and their toxic notions. I feel bad for all the guys who have to go through dating horrible people who think common courtesy is "violence against women".
/r/MensRights04/09/13 01:14 PM
58

Well when your definition of abuse includes being asked out for coffee, no wonder the number is so high.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 11:40 AM
10

It's true that on average women have a lower body mass than men. I actually agree with everything that is on that poster. You should however, check with whatever group put these up if they have one with helpful tips for men as well, or if they have a unisex flyer.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:57 PM
4

The guy called an ambulance after beating the guy but he died. Are you saying it would be wrong for you to defend your daughter if she were being raped?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:59 AM
3

Good for this man. I applaud his actions in defending his daughter. As for the man who tried raping a five year old, he got off light with being beaten to death. That's the kind of thing that once you have control of the perpetrator, you take a gun and you make that sick son of a bitch suffer.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:35 AM
3

In times like that, I always think back to the words of wisdom my mother told me. She said, and I quote, "bitches be crazy". Truer words were never spoken.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:30 AM
-1

http://www.artofmanliness.com/2009/02/22/clip-the-tip-pointcounterpoint-on-male-circumcision/
/r/MensRights03/09/13 01:01 AM
9

Didn't you know? In order to be talented you need to understand musical structure, and structures are rigid and dominating, therefore it's sexist, patriarchal, and possibly rape.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 09:45 PM
24

Know what you do? Make a parody. "She pulled a bitchy stunt so I stabbed her in the cunt"
/r/MensRights29/08/13 05:48 PM
-3

You're ingesting hormones every time you drink milk, eat chicken, eat beef, ect. It's completely unrelated to this though. You look at some really out there feminists, like the ones going on with that "international castration day" thing, and the approval of people online for it is frightening.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 05:33 PM
5

I actually had a discussion about this I think about a year ago. A girl I have on facebook said that by my logic, if a man staggers around drunk and gets stabbed by some punks, the punks aren't at fault because the man was drunk. After trying and failing to wrap my brain around that one, I decided to give up trying to explain shit.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 05:27 PM
2

Do you remember when MREdmonton tried to provoke an honest discussion about rape with their posters? Everyone and their dog lost their fucking shit. There were people online saying the people who made them should be raped, or beaten, or killed. In an age where almost everything can be tracked, I'd rather not go through that, especially considering I am one man. Other posters of this sort have specifically targeted men. The "Don't Be THAT Guy" campaign by the RCMP painted a clear picture of women…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 05:06 PM
16

I'm all for consent, but they try to twist what consent is. They say a woman can never consent when she's drunk. No distinction between a little buzzed, socially drunk, or passed out. By their definition, I'd be guilty of rape if my girlfriend had a few drinks and wanted to have sex with me. It's just all getting to be ridiculous now.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:00 PM
5

I'd be happy if it were unisex at least, but no, all of these posters paint women as the victims and some do go so far as to paint only men as perpetrators explicitly.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:53 PM
15

No, because that isn't their aim. The goal is to shame men into being completely feminized. Replace truth with opinion, facts with feelings, and masculinity with a semi-man bastardization who's been retarded by drugs and hormones.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:17 PM
-3

Everything and anything can mean no depending on the womans feelings. Forget facts and all that nonsense... This is our feminized society now.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:28 PM
12

Problem is that the people who make policies are going into crazy feminist overdrive after the Parsons case.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:23 PM
15

Yeah, we seem to be going pretty damned stupid up here in Canada.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:16 PM
-5

But according to most women's stances on men, men are essentially overgrown children and therefore, by their own logic, are also unable to make an informed decision.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 11:38 PM
22

I know it never works, but still ya gotta try, right?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 03:53 AM
1

I agree that the issue is broader than what I said, and it's actually broader than what you said as well, but I didn't really want to go into differing issues that connect with this. Drinking age differs wherever you are, the voting age is completely arbitrary, gambling age, legal driving age, age to buy smokes, ect... Even in the realm of the age of consent, there are different ages for different things. You can have an age for normal sex, but then some places have a different age of consent fo…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 03:42 AM
8

I think the problem arises with the completely arbitrary age of consent. It can be one thing here, but another there, and another somewhere else. The girl probably understood the situation, but the issue gets blurry when you get into an immediate authority figure like a teacher having a sexual relation with a student.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 03:09 AM
211

Does the government restrict her from buying birth control, or does the government just not want to pay in this scenario? Last time I checked, the government doesn't pay for condoms either.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 01:04 AM
8

Does the fact that it was published in 2005 take away from how horrible this is? It's blatant misandry trying to parade as equality.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 12:47 PM
1

Actually you can look at it as a half race, half gender issue. It's both. If he was a straight black man there would be no problem, if he were a straight white woman there would be no problem, so it's a white MENS problem.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 09:31 PM
1

Personally I'm as anti-jew as I am anti-christian or anti-muslim. I find their practices cruel and barbaric to say the least. Maybe the social justice feminists just don't like them because they're competing for control. It's like the nazis and the communists, they both want the same basic thing, they're just rival camps.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 01:14 PM
-2

That's how I view it. It equates to "hey, we're different from the majority so give us free stuff and privileges". Hence the term special snowflake. I don't mean that difference is inherently bad, but if you want something just because you're different from the majority then you have the "special snowflake" mentality.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:41 PM
3

I don't care if groups want to do work for minorities, I'm just saying that not allowing a member of tbe majority to voice his opinion just because of how he was born is discriminatory, which is ironic for a diversity council.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:20 PM
4

And so can straight white men, but they're never given room to really talk because of the fact they are straight and white, and therefore cannot possibly know what they're talking about.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:04 PM
2

Explain to me how I'm trying to marginalize what you've done. All I'm doing is pointing out that when it comes to issues of "diversity" straight white males are told that they have no right to speak.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 11:46 AM
1

I thought topless protests were for places that legally frown on women exposing their breasts in public. Canada has no laws about that under the criminal code.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:58 AM
2

You think they'd like the Jews though because of all the persecution throughout history.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 09:58 AM
1

I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that this movement had turned into a pissing contest with whoever has done more get's to say "well I've done more so shut your mouth". You're right of course, assuming you've done everything you say you have. But here's the thing, I'm very limited in what I can do. I'm in college right now so that doesn't leave me with too much time, but I do what I can, bringing awareness to people on issues online or irl. So congratulations, you've won the little pissing contest. Tell…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 09:56 AM
2

Forget facts, feminism is doubleplusgood. And remember, Big Sister's watching.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 01:10 AM
38

Nothing like exposing the racism and sexism of a "diversity council". You can be white, you can be a man, or you can be straight, but if you're a combo of all three, sorry, you're not diverse enough to be a part of our special snow flake club.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 01:05 AM
-1

Start knocking teeth. When they complain, tell them to "get over it".
/r/MensRights25/08/13 09:01 PM
3

Me sources are my real life experiences. Why else do you think I'm on r/MensRights if not because I have seen the harm that modern feminism has done to men and boys? I know people who try to distance themselves from the man hating feminists, the "moderates", who still cry "rape culture" and "patriarchy". If feminism is the fight for equal rights, then why are the still around? Point to any instance where women in the U.S., Canada, or any other first world nation do not have equal rights with men…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 08:59 PM
3

Do not use the term "radical" to describe them. They're not "radical" christians, they're not "radical" muslims, they're not "radical" feminists. They are a fundamentalist who has taken the logical path progression. Even the "moderate" feminists preach shit like rape culture and patriarchy, which are used as inherently male systems of oppression.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 06:44 PM
17

Oh, I always further explain my stance on why I think feminism is a hate group, and it really is. I'll point out cases of women being shown legal favoritism. I'll point out their definition of rape and their biased statistics are wrong. I'll show how their movement demonizes the sexuality of men, how the wage gap is a myth, and how the patriarchy is bullshit. I'll back all this up with objective data, and all I'll get is "that's not feminism, you don't know what you're talking about", while they…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 01:00 AM
4

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAUGH! WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THIS GUY?! Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with him? I got to the point where he just got through the CDC's definition of rape, and I couldn't believe it. He slams the dictionary definition of rape in favor of a clearly biased definition, then gets all in a huff when he thinks MRA's that challenge this just want to tip things in our favor. I can't even fathom this man's level of stupidity. I have a feeling that if I were to watch this all …
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:52 AM
26

Last time I was asked that online I responded with "The same reason I'm not a member of the KKK, I don't associate with a hate group". Let me tell you, I got some shit for that one.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:39 AM
29

Is... Is she retarded? Seriously, I could see something like this even 10 years ago, but now? First, I want to know where she get's off talking like she knows what's best for male babies. Just because she doesn't like the way it looks doesn't mean she has the right to mutilate her child's genitals. Secondly, I'd like to see her reaction to a flip of this. Say a baby girl's father said he wanted his daughter to have a female circumcision done because he thought it would look better. There would b…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:30 PM
9

She's not objecting to that. She's objecting to being objectified. Nobody wants to be an object. And I'm calling as much bullshit on that as I am to the women about them expecting "a good provider" or thinking of a man as some kind of money-producing on demand battery powered sex aid. Is wanting to have sex with someone because you find some aspect about them objectifying? If it is, then let me tell you that you're probably going to have a rough go of it in the world. Everyone has a "type" that …
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:26 PM
12

Do you understand human sexuality at all? Humans see someone of a different race and it's that primal switch that's flipped that says "they're different and I find that alluring because of that difference". You know, maybe you're right. Maybe we should all walk in the shoes of a non-white woman's shoes to see what they put up with. Maybe we call also have those women of colour walk in the shoes of a white man where they're constantly vilified, demonized, and berated for being white and having a …
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:11 PM
13

I would break out the words smallest violin for her, but she's just not worth it. What is with these people that make everything about race? They say they want to move past racism yet they weave race into everything they say, and not just as a backdrop, but as a fucking focal point.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:14 PM
2

I took this picture yesterday...
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:06 PM
1

We're already there, Darth. There seems to be an increasing number of people saying that just being male is a threat to females, and our constant masculinity is keeping women in blind victimhood.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:06 PM
2

Sadly, that's probably as far as their thinking goes on the subject.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:01 PM
8

Yeah, I did an (admittedly quick) glance through google for domestic and sexual violence against males in Canada and I got so many different statistics for against women that I didn't know what to believe, but the most recent one I found for males was from 1996.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 10:15 PM
7

Because there's one less man on the market that they can bed and drag to court for money?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 08:17 PM
3

I don’t know how much I can reiterate that assuming women aren’t trying to take responsibility for themselves is the exact opposite of feminism. Really? Feminism is about women trying to take responsibility for themselves? When did that happen? Every feminist group I've encountered in real life or online has always had goals like free birth control, paying women more to make up for generalized "inequalities", and that a woman isn't responsible for her actions if she has anything at all that alte…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:21 PM
4

Thankfully I've never run into someone so totally brainwashed by feminism, but I congratulate you on seeming to keep your cool. Personally, I would have responded to the man with something along the line of "So does she keep your balls in her purse, or was it a chemical castration?"
/r/MensRights18/08/13 04:57 PM
2

Now if we could just get a new great female artist or act to come out, like Heart or Joan Jett, I'd welcome it with open arm and ears. Sadly, that probably won't happen.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 01:35 AM
5

I've checked them out before, and while I don't care for the overall sound, I think Lzzy Hale has one of the most beautiful voices in the hard rock/metal scene and her guest vocals on Device's cover of Close My Eyes Forever was one of the best songs of the year.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 01:22 AM
30

So many things wrong with this. Women are one third of all musicians. Ok, what do they define as musician? Do they just mean women are one third of people signed to a label? One third of people signed to a major label? Or does it include independent artists? If so, does it differentiate between independent artists who have released work or just everyone who plays an instrument and/or sings? Also, the numbers on this don't add up, with a 74% male and 36% female split, that's 110%. They should get…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 01:04 AM
1

So how exactly does one become privileged? Am I to be considered privileged because I am white in a country made by my ancestors? Am I to be considered privileged because I am a man? Would I be privileged if I were rich? What if I had earned the wealth myself? I think saying that I shouldn't benefit from my heritage is like saying a man shouldn't benefit from a fortune his father let him when he died.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 07:02 PM
2

And women can't give birth to children without men to induce that "means of production".
/r/MensRights16/08/13 06:54 PM
225

Can you post a photo with any identifying info blacked out of this form? I would love to see this for myself.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 05:48 PM
2

The majority of them still use that tired old line, but there seem to be more and more who are voicing a more consistent agenda. They've gone from "feminism is for equality" to "feminism is for equality in womens issues" and now they're steadily going to "why would we want to be equal with lowly men? Feminism is about complete liberation from men". The problem arose when people failed to realize that rights don't exist in some static quantity to be divided between groups at the expense of anothe…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 04:01 PM
19

I've never understood why someone would be against paternity tests in child support cases. Sure, the well being of the child is a factor, but it's just one of many. Many people fail to consider that the man has a right to his money, or that it's not right to enslave a man for 18 years for a child that might not be his. It seems as though a man's rights go right out the window when a child is involved. It's reasons like that you need to stand for what is right, even if you stand alone. Keep on ke…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 04:43 AM
27

For me it was building over the course of a year or two, and then sort of a sudden epiphany, like a light bulb turning on. Starting out, I was arguing against feminism because it seemed really one sided. I was told that feminism meant equality so much it was like a broken record, and after a while it started to wear thin. That's when I started doing research and going deeper into facts. I came back with "If feminism is for everyone and works on all problems then what about this, that, and the ot…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:25 AM
3

Neither women nor men are responsible when they are raped. They are victims. But, you can take precautions to not become a victim. In much the same way people are told not to leave valuables in plain view in their car or to look both ways before crossing a street. When I'm out and about I recognize I could get hit by a car or be attacked at random, but I don't automatically assume that every car is out to hit me or that every person is out to stick a knife in me. Always be aware of your surround…
/r/MensRights08/08/13 10:37 PM
-5

Yeah, this is offensive! If I'm playing a game that allows me to slap Hillary Cunton I want to be able to really slap the bitch.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 11:29 PM
1

Ok, care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights06/08/13 01:24 AM
8

It just makes me sick when people say "we're a socially enlightened people". You get the people that respond with "well look at all of these women getting raped" and it's like "damn, maybe we should pour millions of tax dollars in to protecting women", but if you say "look at all these men that get raped" people respond with anything from "well hes a guy so he wanted it" to "men can't be raped so go cry your man tears somewhere else". Getting angry at this shit is natural, and it's the correct r…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 01:47 PM
41

What the actual fuck is wrong with people? This woman has sex with two underage boys and all people seem to be able to say is "man, those boys are so lucky" and "where were women like this when I was a kid?" If this were a grown man having sex with two people (boys or girls) even a year under the age of consent, they'd be demonized by the media and locked up for 10 years. Some people need to get some sense knocked into their heads.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 01:39 AM
12

See, you had a medical reason. That's perfectly fine if there is a legitimate medical reason. If it's done for religious reasons, or so it "looks better", then that is causing undue harm to an infant. The issue of bodily autonomy is very important to both males and females, but the males seem to get tossed to the wayside on these sorts of issues.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 11:10 PM
9

I feel so sad for what this woman and her brother had to go through as children. I have a hard time believing that people could either be openly hostile or apathetic towards their own children, but there it is, in black and white on my screen. And you hear about stuff like this more and more, and you see it around you and it just doesn't seem real.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:40 AM
22

And the majority of the time, these are the same women who say women have a right to abortion because "just because she had sex, doesn't mean she consented to having a child". Don't get me wrong, I'm pro-choice, but the levels of hypocrisy are damned near unbearable.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 10:46 PM
2

http://i.imgur.com/kK8xC3a.jpg?1
/r/MensRights01/08/13 01:29 PM
3

Read it, looked them up on FB, their cover photo says to ask questions, so I did. It's doubtful I'll actually get a response though.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:39 AM
2

That... is retarded, in so many ways. Not only does it mean that a woman can't rape a man, but it also would mean that if I went, stripped down a woman in a alleyway and either penetrated her with a dildo or a fist, it wouldn't be rape. I knew the UK was completely backwards, but I thought India was making progress, aside form the whole "sacred cow" thing.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 12:04 AM
1

Wait... what?! Where? This seems like something I really need to know.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 10:03 AM
17

Wow, this actually made my head hurt. Kudos to the self hating man who made this. He starts by saying that you should never be ashamed of your body, then list foggy "facts" based on a half truth or less to tell you you should be ashamed to have a penis. There are also two points on this that just pop at me. ALL rapes are committed by males While the legal definition of rape leaves out being forced to penetrate, it's still not true that only men rape. Even with the narrow scope of it, women can s…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:58 AM
3

Of course Jezebel covers men's issues. That is to say they cover issues faced by men with jeering and hate and prefer "men's issues" where women have the issues and it's caused by men.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:33 PM
20

I just can't stand the bitches that think every little thing that benefits men, no matter how big or small is "male privilege" yet everything that benefits women is "benevolent sexism" because "patriarchy". Could you imagine a man saying everything women get is because of "female privilege" due to the "matriarchy"? He'd be laughed out of any rational society in a heartbeat.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 01:44 PM
1

Damn, Orwell himself couldn't have thought of a better line of double-think if he tried.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 01:19 PM
8

I somehow managed to get through the entire list without getting sick, but the comments that praise this as wonderful made me lose it. How can so many people think equality means treating women like delicate flowers while treating them like equals and saying they're stronger than men.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 09:03 PM
3

...I just answered that. Legally, rape is defined as forced penetration. If a woman forces you to penetrate her, then it's not counted as rape. Thus, skewed statistics.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 02:23 AM
1

You are aware that rape laws in the U.S. define rape as forced penetration, right? By that definition of course 99% would be males. If you were to include being forced to penetrate in that list then you would get a very different picture.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 02:14 AM
7

Best thing to do is just avoid tumblr and its hordes of shrieking femi-nazis. These are people who think that anything in society that seems to benefit more males than females is "patriarchy" and everything that seems to benefit more women than men is "benevolent sexism". You've been unfortunate enough to witness their own brand of sexism, saying men can't be raped because "rape is about power over women because patriarchy". As a semi-decent human being, let me say I'm sorry you had to go throug…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 05:52 AM
3

But it's not the issues a singular man faces, it's the issues that an entire group of people face. What if people were to start posting about how blacks are discriminated against, and how black men had it worse just because they were black men? Should we not talk about it because "It's not because he's a man, it's because he's black"? Also, how about the societal issue where homosexual women are seen as hot or kinky or something, but homosexual men are for the most part seen as filthy or a threa…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:51 PM
5

Correct me if I'm wrong, but following logic, men's rights are about issues that face men in a legal or societal capacity. Now, last time I checked, gay rights are still a very heated issue. Men can be gay. Gay men are denied rights and freedoms to varying degrees even in the U.S. Therefore, the issues of gay men are not irrelevant to the MRM just because they're gay. It seems counterproductive to discriminate against gay men in a movement that aims to end all discrimination against all men.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:41 PM
1

Is Lisa Bloom mentally disabled in some way? I mean, I know she can string letters together to make words, and string words together to make sentences, but as the saying goes "Given enough time, a hypothetical monkey typing at random would, as part of its output, almost surely produce all of Shakespeare's plays". I believe Lisa is that hypothetical monkey. She may seem like she knows what she's doing, but really there's no real thought in her head aside from "fling poop". Is it scummy what Antho…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:16 AM
3

Self-hating emasculated males unite!
/r/MensRights24/07/13 10:18 PM
3

That's actually great, partially due to the fact that the acronym SHEMU has just the right level of implied shame.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 09:05 PM
0

“I feel like I always have to watch my back, watch what I wear, watch how I act, watch where I go, watch where I sit on the bus, and watch everything around me,” writes one survey respondent. What's that? You need to be aware of your surroundings? How horrible. There will always be creepy and mean people, and you can't just lock people up for being creepy and mean. You need to be aware of where creeps are and avoid or ignore them.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 08:26 PM
7

Haven't you ever been told to "check your privilege"? I have, and it's always by people who say they're for equality. You should know by now that if you're white your opinion or facts you say are invalid, and if you're a man then you're inherently evil. Get with the times, man.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 02:28 PM
5

Wait, why would there be a different place for female mra's? That seems more than a little counterproductive.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 10:20 AM
51

It's so nice to see women speak out against modern feminism. People are finally getting wise to their chronic victimization complex.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 07:24 PM
1

Well yeah, some products need that. Adverts need to keep up with each other and it's to the point now where every one is over the top. Some commercials, like those for Axe need that kind of ad because that stuff smells horrible. How do you sell a bad product? Take the focus away from the product and put it on image.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:55 AM
1

I have to ask, how exactly could all adverts be effective if they didn't show what it can do to/for a person? Of course they're going to have people in them that are seen by the majority as beautiful. Would you be more willing to buy an article of clothing if some good looking fit person were using it, or if it were some horrid looking slob?
/r/MensRights11/07/13 01:58 AM
1

Could you ever have someone ask you "would you like to sample some of my fresh mangina?" and not want to puke though? And I agree. I personally don't apologize if I offend someone with truth or logic. If you do, you act as your own censor and give the other person the false notion that they're correct.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 10:14 PM
1

Actually, yes. There's always a TAA quote for feminists and their white knight manginas though.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 11:08 AM
9

Oh no, there's a commercial that uses images of a fit female to advertise something! Sound the alarm! It's not like men are ever sexualized in commercials. Oh wait, they are. All the time. Even in commercials that are specifically aimed at men you still can find scantily clad men, or at the least, muscular men covered in sweat and without a shirt on. Look at most high end cologne commercials. Feminists who get their panties in a bunch over this stuff need to stop.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 01:45 AM
10

Rape, when properly defined, is the unwanted sexual contact between two or more people. Women can rape men just like men can rape women, or like a man can rape a man or a woman can rape a woman. Just because a dude gets hard, doesn't mean he psychologically wants it. Say a strong woman wanted me to have sex with her. She could physically make me, but I wouldn't want to because I have a girlfriend. In that case, I would have been raped. I'm honestly not sure if you're trolling here, or if you wer…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 01:13 AM
1

My relationship with my mom is great. She's a wonderful mother who loves my dad, my brother, and myself. I know that I can always take any problem to her and she will always help. She actually surprises me sometimes when she'll be online and genuinely agree with the anti-feminist stuff I post. She always asks how mine and my brother's day was when she gets home from work.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 01:02 AM
3

My reply would go as such: The root of the problem isn't just the oppression of women. If it were just the oppression of women, then there would be no "fallout" as you see it. Keep in mind, I can only talk from my own experiences here, but the majority of people I know or have talked to that have said any negative comment towards male victims of sexual assault and rape have been either people under the banner of feminism, or feminist sympathizers. Yes, there are societal attitudes towards women,…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:15 PM
19

i looked through, and you seem to have done everything right. You used quotes involving actual government studies, and were met with the equivalent of someone sticking their fingers in their ears and going "LALALALALAICANTHEARYOUUUUU!"
/r/MensRights07/07/13 04:18 PM
7

I get how a judge can say the welfare of the baby is a priority, but if someone is the victim of any crime, you don't just turn around and say "well you're not really a victim, you wanted it, so now you're going to pay the person who wronged you for 18 years plus back payments".
/r/MensRights07/07/13 03:04 PM
13

I imagine he's one of these men who whip their own back saying "I'M SORRY I'M WHITE! I'M SOORY I'M MALE!" for a good half hour every day when he wakes up and every night before he goes to sleep.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:40 PM
3

So what if they only fake an interest for "social cred"? Should we ban all people who you and others deem to be "fake"? Face it, people will like what they want to and if some people want to say "hey, we know we're a minority here, but maybe people would like it if you did this..." they have every right to make suggestions. And only a minority of them say that games should change, not all of them, but the majority that either like things the way they are or give constructive criticism are good. …
/r/MensRights07/07/13 05:03 AM
5

There are fakes in every field of interest. Some girls are legit into games, some try and fake an interest to seem cool. Some guys are legit into "girly" stuff, while some fake it to try and get laid. Just because something is traditionally enjoyed or done by one gender doesn't mean there aren't people who enjoy or do it of the other gender. My girlfriend is more into games, television, and action movies than I am, where I enjoy housework. Different strokes for different folks. It really is peop…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:47 AM
18

Thanks, now I'm imagining what type of game my girlfriend would design, and it's filled with more scantily clad women with huge tits and asses so big it would make Sir Mix-A-Lot do a double-take. Actually, it'd probably be DOA Xtreeme 2 with more explosions. Great...
/r/MensRights06/07/13 04:54 PM
13

No, they're just there to shame all guys simply because they're men.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 01:32 PM
11

I saw this yesterday and I almost couldn't believe it. I looked over all the posters and read the report and there is absolutely no mention that women can also be perpetrators. It also fails to mention that false rape claims exist. Why is it ok to single out men, use the worst of us to drag us down, and say "hey, you're a man so you're a potential threat to every woman you see"?
/r/MensRights05/07/13 10:29 AM
2

I've talked to "sex positive" feminists before too, but even with them, a logical conversation seems to go right over their heads, unable to get through the rhetoric and lies. If you go after any pillar of their ideology, most of the time they'll flip out. For example, I once tried to provide evidence that the wage gap as seen by feminists simply doesn't exist. I provided sources, graphs, all the information I could find. It all showed that if you lump all women together and compare it with all …
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:35 PM
3

I've read this before and I'll probably run by this trash again at some point. You can't make rational observations with most people that identify as feminists, and trust me, I've tried. There's just this intellectual disconnect when it comes to any issue that they have a difference of opinion on. Some will say that men aren't the enemy yet still treat them collectively as such, while others are more consistent in their beliefs that all men are potential aggressors and rapists, just waiting in t…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 03:18 AM
2

I have actually used this, maybe not in those exact words, in online gaming before, as well as in gaming against friends while in the same room. Gamers expect a certain level of trash talk, and compared to some of the stuff I've heard on XBL, this is tame. It wasn't meant as a rape joke, and the man who said it apologized for it. The fact that people are still reading their own agenda into words taken completely out of context after he explained and apologized is insane. I've also discussed this…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 03:26 PM
20

Alright, lets break this down point by point. 1: The rape joke heard 'round the world I've read many articles about this, and I'll start by saying people have blown it completely out of context and proportion. The offending line was "just let it happen, it'll be over soon". From the video I saw, there was a man and a woman playing Killer Instinct, and the woman was getting her ass handed to her. In context of one person killing another person, it's just a phrase of violence and the oncoming end …
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:05 AM
3

This might sound a bit harsh, but you can't have it both ways. You can't say that one institution is good and one is bad if they use the same tricks. The ends don't justify the means.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 12:42 PM
3

Welcome to how religions operate around the world. Some group wants to control you, and the easiest way is to say that there is something wrong with you. Catholicism wanted to rule everyone and said everyone is born with "original sin", feminists want to rule men and women, so they tell men that everything they do is wrong and oppressive and women that they are constantly the victims. This is social brainwashing 101.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:37 PM
9

The title of the article is "Hating oral sex as the new misogyny? Toward a more feminist sex life". Essentially, it says it is, so I pose this question: if hating going down on a girl is misogyny, is not wanting to give a man a blowjob misandry? You can't have it both ways, ladies.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 09:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter