~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
M4Strings
[removed]
[–]Chazthe19 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"It is to claim that you know what 'counts; as someone else consenting." - what a disturbing quote.
[–]SaxualTigre4 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
disgusting, to think that people actually believe this kind of stuff is shocking
[–]Chazthe13 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The thing is, I wouldn't even call it disgusting. The language used places this firmly in the rhetorical region of 'liberation' and 'empowerment'. It would be so easy for a non-critical reader (as almost everyone is), to just take this at its face value without seeing the obvious fallacies behind it.
[–]M4Strings1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You want disturbing beliefs? Look up Laci Green.
[–]SOSBTK2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
To be fair, I actually think Laci isn't that bad. She can be very informative and realistic in many cases and even though I personally disagree with her in certain cases I can respect that difference. The problem comes when she tries to promote her SJW/feminist views.
[–]Dasque5 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The problem comes when she tries to promote her SJW/feminist views.
Which are integral to her videos. You can't make it through a single one without running into something that needs a Poe's check.
I was a fan of her's for some time before I started running into that stuff. Maybe they are more prevelant now but before the worst it got was when she got a bit too sex positive and anti-fat shaming.
[–]luxury_banana0 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
She's a pretty airheaded indoctrinee who gets views by dolling herself up and showing off her body. This is a pretty successful youtube model for a lot of female youtubers, even the few who have much interesting to say. In fact there's a few male youtubers who are like that too. They're the Justin Biebers of youtube. Shitty opinions and boring content but sex appeal.
[–]Revoran3 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah. Her stuff is fine most of the time (especially check out the popular science stuff on Dnews) and I feel that she genuinely cares about equality and treating people compassionately and fairly, it's just the 10% of weird radfem stuff (like apparently drunk sex = rape) that is an issue.
[–]sizzletron7 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I think it's time we focused on the profit generated by the feminist movement as being a very corrupting motivator. It is disingenuous to even suggest that there isn't money to made if only they can cobble together enough 'evidence' and 'statistics' to secure future funding or donations. I think that the very second they admit they are a conduit for legal or social fraud, their cachet will degrade and their futures being fem-warriors will be scrutinized more than they can afford it to be scrutinized. Government is currently taking everything they say and do as gospel and unimpeachable. The political will to question what feminists are doing isn't there simply because women can vote. This is not to suggest that women shouldn't vote. It's simply pointing out that politics bears little in common with the truth. And the truth is, politicians benefit from appearing consolidated with such things as feminism and feminists benefit from jingling their donation trays after a short presentation of their 'facts' and disproportionate emotional appeals.
[–]Levitz1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Why do I think that the little flask hanging from his neck is the blood of his SO?
[–]luxury_banana1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If you know the history of the dude he's some sort of weird submissive who likes things in his butthole because he has a tiny dick or something, so it's not likely. Google "amazing atheist banana". He recovered from that like a champ though and has more subscribers than ever-- some politicians like Anthony Weiner could learn from him.
None of that invalidate his arguments here, which stand on their own merit.
[–]Mr_Vladimir_Putin-6 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
the problem is I have seen alot of them use "unreported rapes" (rapes that arent brought to attention officially, or are done so years after the fact) in their statistics regarding the percent of rapes that are falsely accused.
but here is the problem. they automatically assume that all of those "unreported rapes" are true, which skews the statistics horribly without proper evidence and convictions to back them up.
on top of that, they rule out the cases where men have not only been falsely accused but also falsely convicted of rape. what about all the cases where men have been convicted of rape and then the "victims" end up recanting and admitting they made it up, years later. so who knows how many times that has happened.
[–]Mr_Barack_Obama7 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is a bot that reposts the top comment from youtube
[–]theskepticalidealist2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
And they only use the statistics of false accusations where they have prosecuted the person.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Chazthe19 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SaxualTigre4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Chazthe13 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]M4Strings1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SOSBTK2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Dasque5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SOSBTK2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]luxury_banana0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Revoran3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sizzletron7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Levitz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]luxury_banana1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Mr_Vladimir_Putin-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Mr_Barack_Obama7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]theskepticalidealist2 points [recovered] | Copy Link