TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MagicTampon Archive

View 30 posts and 3,673 comments by MagicTampon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
246

False AccusationMagicTampon/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:30 PM
231

Edu./Occu.MagicTampon/r/MensRights19/10/17 08:23 AM
169

MagicTampon/r/MensRights14/01/17 07:55 AM
150

MagicTampon/r/MensRights22/10/16 01:27 PM
103

DiscriminationMagicTampon/r/MensRights10/06/17 04:28 PM
79

Social IssuesMagicTampon/r/MensRights23/11/17 08:28 AM
64

DiscriminationMagicTampon/r/MensRights18/09/16 04:04 PM
61

False AccusationMagicTampon/r/MensRights06/08/17 11:33 AM
61

False AccusationMagicTampon/r/MensRights14/11/17 04:01 PM
32

Social IssuesMagicTampon/r/MensRights22/11/17 12:25 PM
31

DiscriminationMagicTampon/r/MensRights28/10/16 12:45 AM
31

DiscriminationMagicTampon/r/MensRights02/12/16 07:28 AM
30

Social IssuesMagicTampon/r/MensRights02/09/17 12:41 AM
29

MagicTampon/r/MGTOW18/09/16 04:18 PM
25

Social IssuesMagicTampon/r/MensRights07/08/17 06:15 AM
21

Marriage/ChildrenMagicTampon/r/MensRights06/11/17 10:59 AM
15

MagicTampon/r/MensRights01/02/17 03:01 AM
12

MagicTampon/r/MGTOW17/09/16 06:22 AM
7

MagicTampon/r/MensRights01/11/16 12:49 AM
7

Edu./Occu.MagicTampon/r/MensRights28/11/17 03:30 PM
6

MagicTampon/r/MGTOW08/10/16 07:10 AM
5

MagicTampon/r/MensRights23/04/17 08:39 AM
4

MagicTampon/r/MensRights12/01/17 02:34 PM
4

MagicTampon/r/MensRights11/10/16 10:37 PM
3

MagicTampon/r/MensRights17/12/17 11:33 PM
2

MagicTampon/r/MensRights11/10/16 10:44 PM
1

MagicTampon/r/MensRights12/12/16 08:38 AM
1

DiscriminationMagicTampon/r/MensRights21/09/16 06:22 AM
1

GeneralMagicTampon/r/MensRights03/11/17 05:27 AM
0

Social IssuesMagicTampon/r/MensRights26/09/17 08:29 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,673 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

She'll be up for a very stiff suspended sentence eyeroll. But in actuality, all of her past cases should be under review, someone should look into whether or not she's ever made any allegations against others. Also, repeal sovereign immunity. If present, abuse of power from public officials should be treated more severely, not less.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 05:07 PM
1

It's easy for women to appear empathic, if their definition of empathy is what benefits females.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 01:29 AM
1

Depends what state you live in. Look up the concept of "parentage by estoppel." You should definitely never acknowledge yourself as the father or hold yourself out as the father unless you have a matching paternity test performed by you with specimens that have been in your possession and confirmed by you collected from the right person. You should never sign any document acknowledging that you are the father, unless you have a paternity test of the same sort. If the mother placed your name on t…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:48 AM
1

Most true.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 01:18 PM
1

For a prenup to be enforceable, it has to be negotiated far in advance of the wedding, and both spouses must have their own lawyer-- paid for by the one asking for the prenup, if necessary.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 09:32 AM
2

I agree with everything. However, not a silent day of protest. A very large public day of protest.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:52 AM
1

Would be nice to see them take on family court discrimination and family court reform.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 05:17 PM
1

Grow up.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 12:03 AM
3

Lolololol won't someone think of the women? Yeah, substituting proxy concerns for real male concerns is pretty despicable behavior. Chivalry must die.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 04:54 AM
2

Well, given ACA coverage for well woman visits but not well man visits, men ought to sue. This is a clear discriminatory practice that needs to be resolved.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 04:53 AM
2

Doesn't fit the damseling shithead narrative. Will be ignored.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 02:09 PM
1

I don't give a crap if it's popular. Your NHS sucks ass. Trump's right about NATO though. You guys should have been on your own 70 years ago. No wait, 103 years ago.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 02:05 PM
3

70 years ago. How is that relevant to anything today? The vast majority of everyone who read that when it came out, is now dead. Plus, more than half of jobs for men in those days were dangerous and unpleasant. You'd rather be cleaning up house during the day, as would I. Nothwithstanding, you can read plenty of jacked up shit about all the myriad chivalrous and matriarchal-presumptuous ways in which men are supposed to defer to women today -- as in today, not 70 years ago. So why go back that f…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 05:50 AM
2

Tell them you promise never to regard women as deserving of such discriminatory deference to traditions such as chivalry. Let them stick that in their pipe and smoke it.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 05:49 AM
1

Most people in the US already want single payer. Any of the 50 states that wants to raise taxes enough to pay for it can have single payer tomorrow, if they want. Nothing is stopping them and nothing has ever been stopping them. California had such a proposal just this year, but the bill was abandoned once they started calculating costs and figuring out how much taxes would be increased. In polls, people will say they want all sorts of things. Then you can also poll them and they will tell you t…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 05:46 AM
4

But police failure to disclose relevant evidence across all types of case, not just those involving rape, is well-documented. All types of cases where the accused are men.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 05:39 AM
1

Archive.is that shit. https://archive.fo/0kfXM Fer christ sake. Were you born yesterday?
/r/MensRights21/12/17 05:19 AM
1

Let's see, a 10 year false imprisonment for a sexual assault amounts to 6024365*10 = 5,256,000 minutes an innocent man is falsely imprisoned against his will for a crime he never committed. 5,256,000 minutes. Whereas an average sexual assault last how long? 5 minutes? 20 minutes at the most. So, do the math. It's well established that Julie Bindel hates men and doesn't give a rat's ass about them. What's puzzling is why the Guardian still publishes her articles.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 05:16 AM
2

UK ought to pay for private lawyers to re-review evidence for every single rape prosecution that has resulted in a conviction since Saunders became director of public prosecutions.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 05:11 AM
20

White females: the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:45 PM
1

I'm glad you don't live here too. God forbid, there remains a part of the developed world where people send some part of their lives taking care of themselves, rather than relying on their government to diaper them. That being the case, the US federal government has so far fucked up up health care enough, they might as well go whole hog and take it over at this point. Government morons have spent the last 40 years hobbling insurance companies' attempts to control costs under the guise of "protec…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:40 PM
1

However the fuck you run your economy you should be able to provide free healthcare, like the rest of the world. Well, most people in the world actually have no health care at all. And if you force domestic laborers to compete with their wages, the same will soon be the case here. And if you read between the lines of the OP's account, you will actually infer that the majority of people in the OPs account actually have Medicare or US social security / disability and hence actually do have health …
/r/MensRights20/12/17 02:44 PM
6

accusing them of chasing rape convictions “like sales targets”. Blame Alison Saunders.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 02:18 PM
2

Repeal sovereign immunity.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 02:17 PM
1

Let me guess - men will be required to show evidence of consent at every step along the way. But when a woman doesn't get consent at every step along the way for everything she does, it will be ignored. Throw feminists in jail. They deserve it.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 04:17 AM
1

Disgusting gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 04:12 AM
10

The most aggravating thing about this is that divorcees will now get their money tax free. If they had taxed it to the payer and the payee -- like ordinary income that would have been bad, but less bad. As it is, they are treating grown women like children (child support). Disgusting. Chivalry and gynocentrism, in all its forms, are total dogshit.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 04:10 AM
4

A majority of people who carry HPV don't even know they have it. Particularly among men, where screening is not recommended by health authorities. Its always a risk, and comes with the territory. Not even sure that women, who unlike men, are screened for HPV and are very frequently positive, are typically recommended to abstain from sex in order to prevent transmission to their partners. My guess is many are not. So if there is any group of people who may be guilty of knowingly exposing others t…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:45 AM
7

SJW social media is a festering disease amongst schoolchildren. It's like Lord of the Flies out there.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 11:36 PM
1

... at least. Not to mention, these includes reports from false accusers foolish enough to report a false accusation to police. Which says nothing about what percentage of unfounded cases would be reported to a journalist or to an HR department -- MUCH HIGHER.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 11:25 PM
1

Identity politics bullshit rejected by normal reasoning children. Obviously, our children are not well served by their public school education.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 11:22 PM
1

Mr Allan’s defence counsel Julia Smart was handed 2,400 pages of transcripts of the phone messages only after the complainant had given her evidence from the witness box when the case opened two weeks ago. His defence team had been pressing for access to the phone records but were rebuffed by the police on grounds that there was nothing of material interest to the case. How disgusting is that?
/r/MensRights16/12/17 12:52 PM
137

WUT? Go back to that police station and file your complaint and see if those records can be brought back up and those people found. Despite my mother’s previous conviction, she was given full custody of me. Part of that could have been because my father was an 18-year-old high school drop-out and couldn’t provide for a child. It's not that at all. Plenty of 18 year-old high school drop outs have full custody of their child -- provided they are female. Part of that could have been because she was…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 12:50 PM
12

Barrister Jerry Hayes claims the detective in charge told him sexual messages sent by the woman to Liam Allan and her friends were 'too personal' to share. WUT?? That detective should be charged. Police have been blamed for the student's ordeal by Mr Hayes but it is common for the CPS to also demand full disclosure of evidence including phone records before any trial. Motherfuckers.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 12:34 PM
11

The so-called victim should be charged.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 12:32 PM
14

'sheer incompetence.' malice
/r/MensRights16/12/17 12:30 PM
2

Go back and review all the prior cases.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 12:28 PM
14

Why were the two women not arrested and imprisoned? Are police completely MIA?
/r/MensRights15/12/17 07:38 PM
2

Good point. I wonder what effect the family courts have played in all of this. Probably substantial.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 07:35 PM
7

Yes, males have substantially higher death rates already. So they make up the bulk in increases in deaths.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 07:34 PM
1

http://www.10minuta.com/images/magazina/2016/apr/vetvrasje.jpg
/r/MensRights15/12/17 07:34 PM
5

You are correct, and, though death rates are rising for both middle class white females and males, the death rates are much higher for men vs women, and so there are frankly a lot more males dying. http://www.10minuta.com/images/magazina/2016/apr/vetvrasje.jpg
/r/MensRights15/12/17 07:34 PM
6

It's probably been demonetized.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 07:05 PM
1

Incompetence? Or deliberate? You be the judge.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 07:03 PM
3

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 07:02 PM
3

He should sue the IVF clinic for the support costs plus emotional damage, and win.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 07:01 PM
1

More survey studies. In other words, bunk. "May you live in interesting times..."
/r/MensRights15/12/17 01:08 PM
1

Freaking disgusting. What state is this? Fuck those legislators. ALWAYS paternity test your children kids. I don't care if you're married to Mother Theresa, get the test. And call your state legislators and get those retards to fix this shit.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 12:15 PM
1

It's not that it's the "victim." It's that the mother is an unrelated third party to the paternal relationship. She doesn't get much say.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 12:12 PM
1

Why should his ex have any say in it whatsoever? She's a third party to that relationship. It has little if anything to do with her.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 11:28 AM
1

Cripes, how many people would be out of a job if I outed ever person who ever sexually harassed me?
/r/MensRights15/12/17 02:50 AM
1

A true hero.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 01:24 AM
5

Congratulations of being held not guilty. Let this be a lesson to all men -- always be recording. I wish you the best of luck and hope that the police will take your complaints as seriously as they did hers. And I wish you best of luck in getting custody of your child.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 01:24 AM
1

Repeat: "The only time anyone ever prods a guy to 'be a man' is when they are trying to convince him to do something that is not in his best interest."
/r/MensRights14/12/17 09:29 AM
1

If she was unconscious, yes. "Blackout drunk" - that depends on how she was behaving at the time. And in fact, people who drink to excess can lose memory of evens that happened prior to the time they became intoxicated (or prior to the time that their alcohol induced deficit became severe enough to produce the blackout.) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20049223 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21919584
/r/MensRights14/12/17 08:10 AM
4

"Norms women did not create," with regard to paying dinner dates -- yes women do create it and maintain it. Most women do expect men to pay on the first date, or most dates. "Norms women did not create," surrounding motherhood and domestic labor -- yes women do create it and maintain it. Most women would be aghast or frustrated if their child's father chose to quit their job and stay home with his children. I just got got finish correcting a female who argued that custody of a child should not b…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 07:57 AM
1

It's interesting how quickly some women will assume they've been raped. Their view of the world must be pretty dismal, to simply assume someone assaulted them, when they have no way of knowing.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 07:34 AM
1

I think that would be a fantastic experience. People need to hear from people like you. I wholly support it. As a precaution, after the speech, when interacting with people, always be recording for a while. While I wouldn't expect any problems, you can never be 100% certain.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 07:32 AM
2

Yes, there is discrimination against blacks in this country. The worst of it is related to familial poverty, which affects blacks much more than whites. Notably, the same cannot be said of females, who access the same economic resources as males while growing up. Sex assignment being an entirely random process, actually erases all historical imbalances in socioeconomic standing between males and females. Actually, being male is the #1 determinant that dictates whether an unarmed person is shot b…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 07:20 AM
1

Moreover, he is definitely a terrible person to attach any men's rights movement to. Who is even suggesting that? Nobody. Not even Roy Moore.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:06 PM
5

If anything, white females in particular should be considered the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of the planet, since white females experience absolutely no discrimination based on their race, access the same family resources as males from birth, yet are still treated to the falsely endowed entitlements of chivalry / feminism.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 07:50 PM
11

Yes you should definitely forward this information to appropriate advocates, including F4J, J4MB and others. Anyone else having such information should let OP know about it and do the same.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 07:34 PM
0

Step up your game. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy
/r/MensRights13/12/17 07:33 PM
1

So what if it's natural? What difference does that make? Frankly, men would be in a much better position in their standing with government if they weren't attracted to women. Why are you posting over with those misandric harpies at all?
/r/MensRights13/12/17 07:21 PM
1

She's a sexist hypocrite.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 08:49 AM
0

It was total bullshit. Only two alleged any behavior that could be construed as worrisome, both were totally unsubstantiated and from 40 years ago, and one of the two accusers, after being challenged, admitted to misrepresenting written evidence to the press, and had to confess to that later. She also neglected to mention that Moore issued a ruling in a divorce action of hers in 1999, 19 years later. And dude, people used to do all sorts of crazy shit back in the 1970's, like smoke at their desk…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 08:36 AM
1

I seems like you know more about it than me: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_March
/r/MensRights13/12/17 08:03 AM
1

Donald Trump is in actuality a counter-puncher, who mostly defends himself by all means necessary. Instead of innuendo, he should have called Gillibrand out as a sexist, flat out. Because that's what she is, and that's the behavior she's displaying at the time he is taking her to task.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 07:52 AM
1

Sounds like you know more abut it than me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_March
/r/MensRights13/12/17 07:48 AM
2

I can hardly blame you for being misinformed (see below). Unlike in the case of females, the educational system in Western democracies (including Scandanavian countries) conspires as much as possible to keep young men poorly informed of the ways in which their government mistreats them. No doubt, females are endlessly educated about every real or perceived transgression against them (no matter how minor; either real or imagined), while boys are left largely ignorant. This is intentional. It is, …
/r/MensRights13/12/17 05:49 AM
0

The solution is easy: don't complement women. This one didn't deserve it anyway, as you can well understand. Men have more important things to concern themselves, than the right to prostrate themselves before females. Just more gynocentric tripe all around. Honestly, the OP can't think of something more important to post about, like child custody, male-structured and supportive educational environments, or something else? We have to see her ridiculous face again and talk about her?
/r/MensRights13/12/17 04:51 AM
1

Too small can't read it. Is there a larger version?
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:50 AM
2

Great news! Hope he F4J can get back to work with their usual antics. We could use some brave llevity these days!
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:02 AM
4

No.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:01 AM
1

. A UW spokesperson would not specify the reason for the program's termination, but did confirm that the school has no plans to convert it into a course for academic credit. No doubt, there were men who joined who were actually men's rights advocates and who were fighting for that passionately, rather than reading from the retarded scripts they were given by their University sponsored feminist overlords.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:00 AM
20

LOL they took out mostly male feminists. The lack of due process is deplorable, but I won't be missing them.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 01:59 AM
12

Destroy chivalry and the masculine expectation that men put women before themselves and each other.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 01:56 AM
1

Men have endured worse for their rights to be treated as equals. https://youtu.be/yrHNig2aIjQ?t=109
/r/MensRights12/12/17 07:07 PM
6

This is from 2015.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:09 PM
1

A good reason for men to keep sitting i those seats!
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:08 PM
1

Oh and FYI inform her of your opinions, and also let her know, that if a child is born, there will be a paternity test. Creepy.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:55 AM
1

What's so great about rubbing smelly bits together? Ewe.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:44 AM
5

Yeah sure. Most women are decent people. A lot are misinformed to think that being female has put them at some sort of disadvantage. There are many who are complete shitheads, just as there are men who are as well.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 04:09 AM
11

Philip Davies: "I demand equality." Labor: "We prefer sexism."
/r/MensRights12/12/17 02:32 AM
1

Wait rationalism or nationalism? Oh I see. Economic rationalism . Oh, well, sorry then, yes, I apologize, there is some of that. Economic nationalism on the other hand, I think is something we could have used far more of over the last 40 years, rather than less. But factually, things were going quite well here before the borders were opened to dirt cheap imports and even cheaper labor. The 1980s were pretty swell, for most, (but admittedly not all) Americans. It was certainly far better than the…
/r/MensRights12/12/17 02:27 AM
2

With respect to the NETHERLANDS: Appears false: However, since then the familycourt practices of giving single parent care to mainly mothers have remained largely unchanged. This in fact is a classic case and example of conservative familycourts and judges involved in the practice of 'legislating from the bench' by largely ignoring instead of interpreting and applying new legislation as it was adopted by the Dutch parliament in 2009. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fathers%27_rights_movement_by_co…
/r/MensRights12/12/17 02:01 AM
2

Except it's not really true.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 01:58 AM
2

ICELAND. Maaybeee.. but pardon my skepticism -- the devil is always in the details. http://icelandreview.com/stuff/ask-ir/2008/12/17/what-laws-does-iceland-have-regarding-custody-children-case-divorce
/r/MensRights12/12/17 01:37 AM
2

With respect to FRANCE: in practice at least, your claim is false. I happen to know a French guy who had a child and who got royally fucked over multiple times by the French courts. Admittedly, this was 10 years ago, but I doubt it's changed. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/6-615-3545?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1 In the light of these criteria, the family judge will often order that the primary residence of the child is with one of his parents …
/r/MensRights12/12/17 01:32 AM
2

With respect to NORWAY: your claims is false. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fathers%27_rights_movement_by_country#Norway The letter of the laws are very similar to those of Germany. With respect to Germany (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fathers%27_rights_movement_by_country#Germany): "The joint exercise of parental responsibility presupposes a viable social relationship between the parents and requires a minimal level of agreement between them." If one parent refuses to cooperate, the court chan…
/r/MensRights12/12/17 01:20 AM
2

With respect to SWEDEN: your claim is false. http://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/38-11.pdf 6 A child typically has more contact with the non-residential parent under joint custody than under sole custody. However, during the 1990s the differences have been reduced. Still, only 13 % of the children with joint custodians have contact less than once a month, compared to 25 % of the children under sole custody. So according to the definitions of this paper, a child can be considered in "joint custody"…
/r/MensRights12/12/17 01:14 AM
5

I've heard this about Sweden. Turns out, it's not true. I know someone who was divorced under the laws of Norway... he was a perfect father, but treated like shit and abused by the Norwegian system. Provide links for the rest.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 12:53 AM
11

This article is from September. What has happened since then?
/r/MensRights11/12/17 08:42 PM
1

It's irrelevant.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 08:40 PM
0

Of course. If they've proved to have made a false accusation, let the courts take care of it. If not, the case is not provable, nothing happens, everybody moves on. The way it should be.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 08:39 PM
2

Rape culture is what idiots believe.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 07:24 PM
1

Chivalry is shit. Sit in those seats, boys.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 07:23 PM
-1

Are you dumb? Sure false accusation happen and will always happen. That's the point really. The important thing is, you only act legal on accusations if the accusations are proved true. And if you can prove the accusations false, you act legally based on that. What lies in between? Who cares, can't do anything about it, let it go. So sure, if someone has made a false allegation and you can't prove it's a false allegation, everybody just needs to move on.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 07:16 PM
2

Yeah, you were sexually assaulted. Report it to the police.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:38 PM
3

have shared custody as the norm Don't know of any in Europe. Where does that exist?
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:55 PM
1

Oh, absolutely, never with family or the legal system itself in any custody-related situation. But politically? Rage is 100% is entirely appropriate, actually necessary.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:20 PM
1

Yeah, it's ridiculous that people seem to have lost the plot in distinguishing victim advocacy from justice, accurate reporting, or even what casual observers ought to think of a situation.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:03 PM
4

Frankly, the majority of what's been reported as sexual assault in the most recent wave of accusations, even if true, seems pretty trivial. Someone put a hand on someone's flank that happened to be exposed? OK, inappropriate? But fired from their job? Stupid. Someone asked someone else at work to be a surrogate? OK, inappropriate. But did they harrass them over and over for it? OK, no. So complain that you didn't think it was appropriate, and over it. Ironically, many of the same liberals who ar…
/r/MensRights11/12/17 02:52 PM
1

OK then, take a break before you rage again.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 02:42 PM
1

Yup!
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:27 PM
1

Yeah, it led to you saying something really stupid 100 years later.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:27 PM
1

Get real.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:26 PM
1

How did this work out I wonder? The entire situation can be summarized as such (according to university administrators)... "Nothing can be a woman's fault, so that leaves men."
/r/MensRights11/12/17 05:18 AM
10

Some ramblings I've posted elsewhere: Modern feminism has evolved into an extension of, rather than a challenge to, the same same antediluvian sexist attitudes that have pervaded culture since antiquity. It has only recast traditional notions to advocate for the priveleges that entitled females feel they deserve right now, in the modern era. As things have developed, white women have been elevated as the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of planet Earth. However, what…
/r/MensRights11/12/17 05:02 AM
1

How nice of you to paint a moderately pleasant picture of something that is in actuality much more dismal than the way your portray it. Nice try.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:14 AM
2

Yes, look up laws in your state -- single party consent vs. dual party consent; also when there might be a reasonable expectation of privacy, and when not. Record everything.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:13 AM
2

Justin Trudeau needs to apologize for being a disgusting pig. Canadian MRAs should organize a protest holding signs saying Trudeau is a disgusting pig.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:09 AM
1

We need tarriffs to keep out cheap imports and rebuild a useful economy. Things were much better her before this globalization nonsense started.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:06 AM
2

No, they don't need any help. They need to be left alone.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:04 AM
2

When is the BBC going to do a documentary about false rape accusations?
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:03 AM
-7

Not sure why anyone cares. Shit happens, and will always happen. That's life -- deal with it or get lost.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:02 AM
1

Absolutely. All men should paternity test their kids at birth. 100% of the time. Which is what I've been saying constantly here. Unfortunately, wusses here mostly seem lukewarm on joining in to push for it.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:01 AM
0

Once robots take over, and everyone is provided before without the need for human labor, it will be commonplace for men to not to pay to support their own children -- and unfortunately (if current trajectory is any indication) also to be cut out of their lives entirely against their will. Until then, it's not going to happen, ever. So stop talking about it. Wear a rubber and advocate for RISUG. Pussy's not so great anyway. Not sure why you would care.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:59 AM
1

Legal paternal surrender isn't going to happen, period. Stop talking about it. It make the MRM look like a bunch of stupid kids.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:57 AM
4

Become a lawyer and fight it.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 06:17 PM
1

Nothing about shared custody? Are you nuts? Legal Paternal Surrender Never going to happen.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 06:17 PM
2

As a male, you need shitloads of money and a lawyer. Without that, the system has nothing for you. The best thing you can do is fight politically, with your time. Join your local men's rights group / fathers rights groups. Lobby your state legislators. Recruit others.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 06:14 PM
3

It's likely just a front Facebook is running, so that they can ban 1/100 nasty misandric posts while banning 100/100 posts which are slightly critical of females but which are not at all misogynistic. Balance is all in the numbers really. Which Facebook has no plans to be transparent about. Don't believe the hype. Free speech always, no exceptions.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 11:21 PM
1

Censorship is not good. It would be far better if men would be allowed to respond to these women by ripping them a new one.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:51 PM
1

Good for you! Probably would be my attitude if I weren't married. A great many shitty women around these days, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:08 AM
1

Don't treat women special. Ever. That's my motto.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 04:56 AM
1

There are a few. But most women buy into the "ladies first" crapola at some level. Which leaves very few.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 04:44 AM
5

If they're that nuts, be glad they're keeping to themselves.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 04:43 AM
1

Most provide what by US standards would be considered shit care. Though, some strategies from other countries might improve things a bit in the US -- such as throwing certain patients out of the office if they take up more than 5 minutes of the doctor's time, without the potential for filing meaningful patient complaints or the doctor being sued.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 03:47 AM
2

Break up with her.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 03:32 AM
1

LOL yeah, right. In other words, the national healthcare system was always doomed to suck, but no amount of reforms to the national system could adequately repair it. Maybe back in the day, when all doctors could do was treat sore throats, give people largely impotent elixirs, and vaccinate people, it was something the government was competent enough to run. Modern medicine is far too complex for government to run in the US. We already have a government pay system in the US. It's called the Vete…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 09:26 PM
1

Lies.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:09 PM
1

Except the NHS is continually running out of money, the care is shit, and you've got government people poking around inside your underwear. "The government fucked this shit up so bad, the only solution is more government." Said no rational person ever. Plus, it's an established fact -- there is nothing so lazy as a government employee. Their employees are also lazy. The only time their doctors work hard, is after they've left for another country that doesn't suck.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:07 PM
1

... which is why it should be deregulated, larger players broken up, and behind-the-scenes dealings set out to air. That way running as a health care provider doesn't require starting off with millions and millions of dollars - an enormous barrier to entry that allows big bucks to run the show unchallenged.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 05:21 PM
1

I've been called worse. Implying that that you were homosexual would be flattering (I'm sure Milo would agree). But that's not what I'm saying at all. http://www.nme.com/news/music/eminem-98-1233282 * Unfortunately, even this guy's turned into a fag (after he struck it rich).
/r/MensRights08/12/17 03:44 PM
1

Never let a camel get it's head into your tent.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 03:34 PM
1

Trudeau He's a huge fag. https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2017/06/09/trudeaus-new-feminist-plan-commits-95-of-foreign-aid-to-gender-women-and-girls-by-2022.html A lot of people in government are huge fags.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 03:28 PM
1

Yes, they live long, miserable lives. Caloric restriction does increase life expectancy. You can also burn all your money and belongings in a garbage can, live and acerbic lifestyle with reduced access to food and accomplish basically the same thing. You can also do it without making everyone else do it with you! You believe the Cuban government's data collection that is used to compile statistics on life expectancy? LOLOLOLOLO
/r/MensRights08/12/17 03:26 PM
1

She's on steroids?
/r/MensRights08/12/17 12:59 PM
2

Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 11:53 AM
1

Does Howdy Doody have a wooden ass?
/r/MensRights08/12/17 11:51 AM
4

Nearly the only people who pay attention to shoes are women.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 11:50 AM
1

What a POS.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 11:49 AM
7

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hollywood is like a big joke.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 11:48 AM
6

Yes, young people, they actually did this. Took over Wikipedia using the usual whining narratives. Now it's a feminist shit hole.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 11:47 AM
2

I' kinda not going to listen to what feminists have to say.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 11:43 AM
1

That is Not normal representation of universal healthcare, Well, when the government takes it over completely (e.g. the NHS) rather than creating a hybrid system (the UK), they can do whatever they want. Which they do.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 11:40 AM
1

No sure, health care in Canada is not bad. There are some problems though with people waiting for elective surgeries for so long, that they come to the US to get it done if they have the money ($$$ for the uninsured), but Canada is overall somewhat preferable to the US. The big problems driving costs in the US, are the indirect costs of lawsuits, and the massive amount of government regulation. Private entities tend to be treated like garbage by the US government, usually at the behest of social…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 11:28 AM
1

Yes, if you have a sore throat, appendicitis or need a mammogram, there are plenty of polite doctors in Cuba who will see you. However, if you have real illness and not a lot of American money to pay for your treatment, don't go to Cuba. There are a lot of foolish people who romanticize a lot of foolish medical care, and Cuba happens to be another example of that. That being said, medical care in the US is far too expensive. The main drivers of cost are indirect effects of the medicolegal system…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 11:24 AM
1

Besides, we've always had universal healthcare it this country. It's just that it went by a different named -- bankruptcy. I'm being only slightly sarcastic.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 11:37 PM
1

Wait until we an afford it.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 11:35 PM
1

Of course they are. That's what you all get for associating with damseling shithead liberals.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 11:26 PM
7

Oh, of course they would have still kicked him out. That goes without saying -- university administrators are complete anti-American misandric bigots. But then, at least it would have been exposed to the public for what it was, and there would be some transparency and light shone on their total bigotry. Now however, they'll just obfuscate, and pretend that the real reason they are kicking him out is the recording, not the made up lies about what he didn't do. Meanwhile, their nasty little lying …
/r/MensRights07/12/17 10:03 AM
1

We do?
/r/MensRights07/12/17 06:42 AM
0

Boy, are you ignorant.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 06:38 AM
0

Actually, wrong.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 06:37 AM
0

Ignorant really, particularly for someone who visits a men's rights group. There is no reason why anyone should pay child support, so long as they are open and willing to take care of their own child themselves, in their own home. So for example, if a woman sues a man in court to take custody of his child, that ought to be her way of stating she isn't eligible for his financial assistance, either. Plenty of couples work out shared custody arrangements, where children spend close to half of their…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 06:36 AM
2

Yeah what's the problem? I should try doing that.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:55 AM
35

Should have never told them that there was a recording until the very last moment when there was a chance to present at the disciplinary hearing. They would have been forced to acknowledge that the accuser was a liar. As it is, keep the recording, and once you are kicked out, sue the shit out of them, and also sue the shit out of the girl who lied about you. Don't accept their lies. You are going to be kicked out no matter what. No matter how they try to convince you otherwise, don't believe the…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:21 AM
17

He'll be kicked out no matter what. Once he's kicked out, he should set up to sue the school and the woman who falsely accused him. Sue them hard.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:19 AM
1

Can't fathom what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:03 AM
2

Mr Hamilton said it would be considered whether either "gender-based" or "single gender female" should become a category of hate crime, suggesting that crimes against men could also be included. Sexist piglets and female chauvinist sows. These are the people who are trying to "fix" our alleged problems.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:12 AM
1

Histrionics. Women are not special.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:11 AM
1

Why is this here?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 10:24 AM
2

While there is a difference between average earnings of men and women in the United States, these differences are not due to discrimination. There are many reputable studies that demonstrate that the gender wage gap evaporates to nearly nothing once confounding variables are factored in. The residual small amounts remaining wage gap are just as likely to be secondary to non-discriminatory factors that the studies cannot precisely measure or control. Studies that reveal that the wage gap is narro…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 10:23 AM
6

Female chauvinist sow. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 10:22 AM
1

I also wonder if the interest rate might b lower if both your names are on it (e.g. the look at your higher overall income). Not sure on that. It may not matter.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 01:19 AM
1

I doubt it matters whose name it is in at this point. Legally more, half of that house is hers. In practice, it' much more than half hers. Nothing you can do about it except vote the bastards who make these rules out of office. If possible in your contry, elect new jusges too.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:39 PM
16

You need a lwayer. Unfortunately, yes, men are sent to jail for crimes they did not commit. be careful.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:09 AM
1

Can a woman falsely accuse a man of sexual misconduct and easily get away from it in USA? Yes. Women do it all the time. Just read the news and look at the list of exonerees from prison sentences that should never had been served. And those are the select few cases of false accusations which are discovered when women are particularly bad liars or have a sudden change of heart.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:06 AM
2

No. If anything, we are too kind. .. and mosty it is not reciprocated. I may remind you that men have died and gone to war to obtain their rights and freedoms. If you ever believed that MRM could achieve anything just by being nice, dispel that nonsense.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:01 AM
2

Tremendous. If I were gay and had a uterus transplant, it would make me want to have his babies.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 08:50 AM
0

No, I'm commenting on the fact that you commented that I was downvoted. Otherwise, I wouldn't have commented because I never even bother to check. Because I don't care. LOL factually true though. Smelly bits smell bad. I think reasonable people are sick and tired of politics being derailed by various histrionic hand-wringings about young people and their smelly bits.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 08:29 AM
1

Yeah, it is.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 06:41 AM
1

I could care less if I get downvoted. Why would anyone care? How old are you? Nobody is restricting women's access to contraception. More histrioncis again. Anybody in this country has access to contraceptives, and that is not changing, ever. The only debate has been a fringe debate whether or not a very small number of women will have access to free (as opposed to self-paid) oral contraception. It is only a select few religious organizations who are not going to pay for it. And it is a moot iss…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 06:30 AM
1

Well, if the lawyer doesn't take it on contingency and he doesn't have the money, then he wouldn't do it. No reason not to ask.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 06:23 AM
1

Congress is attacking women's rights left and right No, they're not. That's just the usual histrionic damseling. Women: nothing special.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 05:15 AM
1

Conceptualizing life at birth through a bogus tax reform Yes, life is present at birth. Life at birth -- it's pretty much a given. I think you've gotten some sort of ideological derangement going on. Take some time to clear your head. Looks like you're complaining about something that is basically meaningless except for accounting purposes, and at any rate, has been removed from the Senate bill. http://www.newsweek.com/unborn-children-no-longer-get-tax-breaks-senate-republicans-revised-plan-7306…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 05:08 AM
2

Ironically, he likely knows nothing about Men's rights. He's anti-[something he doesn't know anything about]. Maybe rent him a copy of The Red Pill.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:56 AM
1

Surprise, surprise. A lot of women like damseling. Gives them the warm & fuzzies.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:55 AM
1

Read here: http://www.wisegeek.org/what-does-paying-a-lawyer-on-contingency-mean.htm .. it may not cost you anything.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:54 AM
1

Did you not read or understand what I just said? On "contingency", a lawyer takes a fee if the case is won, usual a percentage of the award. If the case is lost, the lawyer charges nothing. If he has a recording, he might have a rock solid case, depending on the circumstance. A lawyer may be willing (or eager?) to take the case on contingency. http://www.wisegeek.org/what-does-paying-a-lawyer-on-contingency-mean.htm
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:53 AM
1

If it is legal to record (look up single party consent vs dual party and when reasonable expectation of privacy exists and whether that matters in your state) and you have it recorded, you may find that if you show the recordings to a lawyer, they may be eager to take your case, just for a cut of the proceeds. Let an employment discrimination lawyer take it on -- make sure to check with more than one lawyer too, as even some lawyers may discriminate in taking you on as a client because you are m…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:42 AM
1

No they're not. If he had good recordings, a lot of lawyers would know that the chances of success are so high, they'd do it without any up front money -- they'd well just ask for a cut of the settlement or the award.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:37 AM
1

If legal in your state, always be recording. Then take it up with HR to let them know that, yes, women can be bigots.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:36 AM
1

No, Harvard is just actively discriminating against those who exercise their freedom to associate.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:35 AM
1

following the election of Trump Irrelevant.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 02:31 AM
9

You are being stalked by a nutter. (1). Always be recording. (2) Report every event where she breaks no contact, to authorities immediately. Every. Single. Time. If nothing is done, file a complaint with the title IX office both at your school and nationally.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 11:45 PM
11

Because nothing even in Brock's own testimony indicates that she did anything that could have been construed as an assault on him. There are those who allege he fingered her while she was unconscious though. So I guess that's the difference. If he had a credible allegation of assault against her, then I might argue that they should have both been charged, and see what happened from there (both decide to refrain from pressing charges I gusss.) Seems like that's not the case tough. I do agree, the…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 11:33 PM
1

Awesome!
/r/MensRights04/12/17 11:27 PM
1

No, I meant his version of events didn't seem very believable. That's just my opinion. Others may differ.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:25 PM
1

There is no evidence she was unconscious at the time he initiated sexual activity. Whether or not she was unconscious "at the time he initiated" is not dispositive. If she had fallen unconscious at some time during the activity, and a reasonable would have noticed, whereas he did not (because he was too drunk), then that would still be considered assault. Also, I believe the legal standard in California is "incapacitated", not necessarily unconscious. The jury apparently believed it was proved b…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:07 PM
3

No. If anything, we are too kind.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 10:03 AM
1

Hm well, I'm not sure if that other person got it right: At least, that is not what Turner says here: http://heavy.com/news/2016/06/brock-turner-full-statement-letter-judge-aaron-persky-court-victim-rape-stanford-rapist/
/r/MensRights04/12/17 09:57 AM
2

Female chauvinist sow!
/r/MensRights04/12/17 09:39 AM
1

Sure, they should regarded the same. But Brock Tuner wasn't laid out unconscious while the woman fondled his dick. It's certainly possible he was incapacitated at some point, in which case, if she had made out with him or something, maybe that technically would have been assault, and they could both be charged. Did that happen? Could it be proved?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 09:34 AM
1

here is another thread here now from someone defending Turner in the following way, according to Turner's own testimony: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7hf9ex/brock_turner_after_reading_the_court_documents_i/ [Turner] claims he got consent and was too drunk to notice that she stopped responding. ... but if that's true, Turner basically admitted to fingering her once she had fallen unconscious, which could be appropriately regarded as assault. And again, the fact that he was self-in…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 09:28 AM
1

It would change to the prosecution having to prove that Brock was aware that she was that drunk and that he intended to take advantage of that condition. Sure, I'm just pointing out that this statement you made is not true. All they have to prove, is that a reasonable (sober) person would have realized that she was incapacitated. If she functions without memory, the fact that she has no memory doesn't mean that a reasonable person would have understood that she was incapacitated. A reasonable pe…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 09:14 AM
1

Even natural sleep would be considered a form of unconsciousness for the purposes of what happened here. If you initiate sexual activity with a sleeping (unconscious) person, that would legally be considered a form of sexual assault,. e.g. https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Sleeping-Woman-Sex-Abuse-Airplane-New-Jersey-Man-Arrested-167043365.html
/r/MensRights04/12/17 08:43 AM
1

She was never unconscious. When police arrived she was snoring. Paramedics pinched under her nail beds and she woke up and responded immediately. She later vomited without assistance. So, she was unconscious then. Why did you say she "was never" unconscious. He claims he got consent and was too drunk to notice that she stopped responding. Being self-intoxicated is not an excuse for much of anything. I think he'd probably be held to the same standard as if he were sober. If a sober person would h…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 08:28 AM
1

It would change to the prosecution having to prove that Brock was aware that she was that drunk and that he intended to take advantage of that condition. Is that true in California? In most states, it would be a "reasonable person standard." If a "reasonable person" (e.g. a sober person) would have been aware that she was incapacitated, then he is guilty of assault. In most states, self-intoxication is infrequently, if ever, accepted as a mitigating factor in evaluating the conduct of the accuse…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 06:48 AM
2

I read about 60% of it, including almost all of the important parts (e.g. I skipped all the stuff about the media and so forth). There is a ton of junk there that does not really provide any particularly exonerating information. If there is anything useful in that web site, it is impossible to filter away from all the mostly irrelevant dreck. I can't exclude the possibility that there is something buried in that site that might change my opinion, but I just can't find it. But as this is a public…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 06:43 AM
1

The article is from July. Still celebrating this meager non-victory? At least implore them to do better.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 10:28 PM
2

The alcohol levels are direct levels people will use to establish the likelihood that she actually was passed out and not just faking it. LOL you're a nut job. It doesn't even matter if she was "faking it." If a person is passed out, or even pretending to be passed out, it doesn't even matter, because either way that is a person who is no longer consenting. Go be a dumb ass somewhere else. If she had given consent and then fallen asleep because Brock sucked at fingerbanging and he did not think …
/r/MensRights03/12/17 10:22 PM
1

What statement? Whose statement? Brock Turner's statement that he asked her for "affirmative consent" before sticking his finger in her? Not very believable, IMHO. I don't know what we have to keep talking about this guy here. He's apparently a total idiot. Turns out, the woman is apparently a total idiot also, but, there it is.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 10:12 PM
1

A lot of inconsequential stuff and not much useful information that I can find there. The only thing it brings up, is the scrutiny of the testimony of the Swedish witness. If that is all that Turner is bringing up on appeal, U doubt it is going to change anything. We'll see.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:57 PM
1

You spoke too soon. Harvard is cracking down of freedom of association for its male students: http://www.wnd.com/2017/11/harvard-punishes-students-in-all-male-clubs/ http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/09/harvard-faculty-refuses-to-rescind-punishments-for-frat-bros/ Of course, there are the usual bigoted calls to allow women freedom of association, not men: https://reason.com/blog/2017/09/27/harvard-crimson-university-is-right-to-b No reason for optimism based on your post, I am afraid to say. Univer…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 09:03 AM
1

The blood alcohol estimates are not very relevant. It is well established that they were both plastered. The only factors are: (1) How reliable were the witnesses? If he was established to be engaging with her while she was out, then, case closed. (2) Her DNA was found on his hands. Were they able to prove it was from his fingers being in or on her private parts? Did they test her hands for his DNA? (3) Were the same standards of conduct applied to her as to him? I think they probably were in th…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 08:43 AM
1

Better to just be an "I-don't-care-o-male."
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:50 AM
1

“Working-class Americans pulled back from Democrats in this last period of Democratic governance because of President Obama’s insistence on heralding economic progress and the bailout of the irresponsible elites, while ordinary people’s incomes crashed and they continued to struggle financially…. That and both his and Hillary's stance towards "open borders." The deluge of undocumented minors that came over the border in the year before the election, and the democratic response to it, was frankly…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:36 AM
1

True, but I doubt the facts as stated are different than what was presented at trial. Of course, the trial was in California so there is that.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:34 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_v._Turner#Incident_details
/r/MensRights02/12/17 10:11 PM
1

If there is anything religion ever got right, it was convincing men not to care about stinky vagina.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:00 PM
3

Horny men are actually a ludicrous and absurd thing to behold. Sadly, horny men are easily manipulated, especially by women, and particularly by feminists. Horny men are a large part of what accounts for the sad state that men are in politically now, and MRAs should be the first to recognize that and challenge that for what it is, on their own terms. MRAs should as much as possible educate men from a young age about the trappings of libido, and how it motivates men to do the dumbest things that …
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:48 PM
1

Nope. He stuck his finger in her when she was passed out.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:42 PM
1

There is no reason for there to be a difference of opinion. It's a nice manifestation of criminal justice reform however, that the judge offered him a lighter sentence. Most men will not be so fortunate.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:08 AM
3

Nice thoughts, I agree with everything you say. Except the part about asking who is going to fight their next war. I don't care. Hopefully, nobody. Or, draft women and make them do it. Stop defending women. That's how people ended up fucking you over in the first place -- defending women. It's obvious, you're wasting your time defending women. Instead, go to war on them.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:04 AM
1

Disgusting person. I hope he finds out now and rectifies the situation.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:01 AM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:59 AM
1

Disgusting person. I hope he finds out and is able to rectify the situation.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:59 AM
1

That's true. But Brock Turner sexually assaulted his victim, and was thankfully convicted.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:56 AM
2

You're welcome!
/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:05 AM
1

Since the female mating scheme is hypergamy, women create an incentive for men to acquire status and rise to the top of the hierarch Oh it's far worse than that. Women brainwash men throughout childhood and during young adulthood to abide by a chivalrist sexist ladies first code of conduct. Hence "patriarchy" (really matriarchy same thing). What matriarchy looks like: http://i.livescience.com/images/i/000/037/099/i02/african-lion-pride.jpg?1361809335 Female hypergamy dictates that women will fre…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:52 AM
1

Female chauvinist sow.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:50 AM
1

Another idiot liberal arts educated journalist doesn't know how to link to the primary source on their article or use a footnote. Whatever, I'm going to go ahead and call bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 02:00 PM
4

Just another reason for feminists to whine.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:54 PM
1

Nothing flawed about Steve Jobs. You are displaying popular ignorance on the subject, and couldn't possibly be privy to the information that Jobs had at the time he made his decision. Per my understanding, Jobs was originally diagnosed using an imaging scan, probably a CT, that showed a pancreatic tumor. This is a very nice non-invasive way to find out you have something growing in your pancres; except for the fact that, without a definitive piece of tissue removed (by biopsy), there is no way t…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 04:00 AM
0

That man should have been President. I believe that if he hadn't been diagnosed with cancer, he would have run in 2012, or maybe in 2008, and undoubtedly, he would have won. Would have changed everything.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:16 AM
2

She's metaphysically hideous, but unfortunately, there are a lot of guys who are still willing to engage with her.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 03:08 AM
30

Lena Dunham may be the first person to fabricate details of her alleged rape, then proclaim all women’s claims need to be believed, and then publicly accuse a young woman of lying about having been raped. Yup.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 03:23 PM
23

Their lives aren't ruined by anything the university did or didn't do. That's the entire point, really. Trudeau is a sexist POS.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 03:20 PM
4

That kid would be too young for make-up even if he were a girl...
/r/MensRights28/11/17 07:39 AM
3

Nice article.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 07:28 AM
1

Yes, there are some decent women out there still. It's lamentable that the state purposefully destroys men on a routine basis. Unfortunately, that woman a man divorces often bears little, if any, resemblance to person he married. So even in the best of circumstances marriage has become -- a priori -- a hazardous proposition for the man. Q. Aren't these one sided divorces killing the family system, or at least discouraging perceptive men from marrying? A. Yes, and that's why you see the matriarch…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 07:14 AM
1

Find footage from the elevator and preserve it.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:56 AM
6

It is disgusting.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:54 AM
3

If legal in your jurisdiction, record conversations of your organization's leaders talking about discriminating against women. Collect documentation. Become a whistle blower.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:54 AM
1

Thar guy is a sexist douche.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:45 AM
2

The general setup in each state, is that if the woman wants to take primary custody, she can. The man will be reduced to contact once every other weekend, and pay for the privilege of having been dicked over. God, don't they teach you kids anything in school anymore? In every case where states have come close to passing shared custody legislation, women's groups and bar organizations have blocked it. The usual damseling shitheadery. It's everywhere more or less the same. For example in New York:…
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:37 AM
9

Women are not special.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:33 AM
2

Report her to her state health care licensing board.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:32 AM
1

California is a disgusting place.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:31 AM
1

but my mom, and two of my aunts got divorced and THEY never got alimony Several possible explanations: (1) They never asked for alimony; had an "amicable" divorce. Not all men will be so fortunate. It's basically up to the female what they want to try to take from him, and what not. (2) Or they could have been primary or substantial wage earners. (3) Also, often times a woman will negotiate in a divorce so she agrees to forgo alimony, but in exchange, she gets something else of value. So for exa…
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:20 AM
2

$600,000 in damages Doesn't even begin to cover it.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:11 AM
1

Chivalry is shit.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:09 AM
1

Sue.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:08 AM
0

Well, there are two sources from opposite ends of the political spectrum (at least, the part of it that is allowed into discussion), both of which agree that he tried to add it to the 2010 GOP platform. ... and, once again no sources. Total bullcrap... not that it even fucking matters. Anti-sodomy laws even when they are on the books have pretty much never been enforced. OMG he sez pee pee and vagina bad bad! So bad bad! Who cares? They're just smelly bits. Not particularly appealing anyway. Eve…
/r/MensRights26/11/17 09:16 PM
1

domestic-violence perpetrators recorded by the police are men Yeah, cops are horribly biased against males, as is the entire criminal justice system. So basically, this study is not useful.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 09:14 PM
10

In other words, the Violence Against Women Group.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 03:13 PM
1

In other words: It says something that you don't want to be true. I don't really care if it's true. All I care about, is the fact that this is a rumor that seems to be often repeated, yet the journalists who do so, appear to cover their tracks by obscuring exactly where this information comes from. Now, the fact that American journalists, in particular, have become lazy Journalists, like most all liberal arts educated jackasses, have always been lazy. Particularly, when it is convenient for them…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 03:06 PM
1

I'm pretty tired of proxy concerns for men's rights. How women benefit or don't benefit is of little interest.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 08:00 AM
1

Are most women feminists?
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:48 AM
1

I doubt they care.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:47 AM
1

Remember that Joe Barton in 2010 supported adding re-criminalizing sodomy to the GOP platform. Provide a link or a name and source for the thing he supposedly supported that says this. If you're listening to journalists who are incapable of providing precise footnotes to primary source documents, you are listening to fake news. It's belies the laughingstock that is liberal arts education, that someone could be educated as a journalist, yet not know how and when to use a footnote. Provide the pri…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:47 AM
1

These stilly women are too dumb to realize that if alimony and custody laws are not reformed then men are simply going to stop getting married entirely I don't think they care really.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:28 AM
1

Maybe he's for family values up until the point where your spouse cheats on you. Thereafter, you get to fuck whomever you want.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 10:08 AM
1

Ridiculous. Same old ladies first bullshit, over and over.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 10:06 AM
1

I also went to high school and had to listen to high school teachers. They are far worse now than they were then also.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 10:06 AM
1

And so? I'm sure they have their reasons. Besides, you've never seen someone do 75 in a 65 zone? Does that make them a hypocrite if they're not in favor of increasing the speed limit? What's the big focus on sex anyway? Sex is boring, who cares?
/r/MensRights24/11/17 10:04 AM
1

Executives and employees aren't comparable. http://sayanything.areavoices.com/entry/irs-lost-emails-six-employees-involved-targeting-conservatives-lois-lerner/ http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/21/judge-orders-irs-to-reveal-who-took-part-in-tea-party-targeting.html https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-irs/irs-chief-declines-to-identify-employees-involved-in-scandal-idUSBRE94F10Y20130517 https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/irs-employees-ordered-send-tea-party-cases-irss-only-obama-politi…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 04:34 PM
2

I know. Some of the conservative guys I know are among the most promiscuous people on the face of the planet. Nothing incompatible with that at all. Also, pot, tea kettle, black.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 04:27 PM
1

He is getting trashed because he has been claiming to be a "family values conservative" for 30 years, For clarification, is he a "family values" person so far as fucking and taking your clothes off is concerned? http://www.joebarton.com/about-joe/ Don't see it there. As a matter of fact, I can't find one reference to the words "extramarital" or "marriage" on his entire web site. It appears you may not know many conservatives in real life. I know plenty of conservative, gun-toting people who have…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 04:25 PM
10

Should have been 40 years. the same sentence a ma would have gotten.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 10:06 AM
1

Did I hear her say misandry is a hate crime?
/r/MensRights23/11/17 10:06 AM
3

Modern feminism has evolved into an extension of, rather than a challenge to, the same same antediluvian sexist attitudes that have pervaded culture since antiquity. It has only recast traditional notions to advocate for the special perks that entitled females feel they deserve right now, in the modern era. As things have developed, white women have been elevated as the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of planet Earth. However, what (mostly white) feminists do is emi…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 09:32 AM
2

... Something something something ladies first sexist bullshit something something something.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 08:39 AM
8

Sounds like the lady may have been a crazed stalker. Thought she was the "only one" only it turned out she wasn't. If true, it just goes to show to what lengths female entitlement extends these days. Never give photos of yourself doing anything unusual, to anyone. I don't really care if he had affairs or exchanged photos with people he knew consensually. I do care that the letter of the law is followed dispassionately and accurately. Let's see what happened.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 08:33 AM
3

Yup.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 08:31 AM
4

Stay off Tinder; it's full of sexist garbage.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 08:31 AM
3

I was thinking the same thing.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 03:41 AM
8

They were only married for three years. States generally put limitations on what a prenup can and cannot do. Property acquired during a marriage will generally always be split evenly, regardless of what the prenup says. But generally speaking, it is always good to has things out with a lawyer, educate yourself, and get a prenup long before getting married.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 12:42 PM
1

LOL tell that to Louis Lerner.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 12:11 PM
14

File a restraining order. There are some real sickos out there.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 04:34 AM
3

Dating women is over-rated. Particularly these days. "Nothing can be a woman's fault, so that leaves men."
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:33 AM
3

If he's talking about the senate candidate from Alabama, there is in fact no woman calling him a rapist. There is one woman accusing him of sexual misconduct of some sort -- getting handsy in a car when she was above the age of consent. And there is a second woman claiming he got a handsy with her when she was under age (14). Back in 1978-79. It's a little hard to rape someone when their clothes are still on. They both waited until he was nominated as a senator to come forward - for 38 years.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:32 AM
3

* Bill Clinton is a rapist.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:25 AM
2

LOL colostomy, but I like your sense of humor on something that is definitely not funny.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:23 AM
1

Unsurprising. Government and social services are full of bigoted SJWs.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:21 AM
2

Sick.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:19 AM
1

"Nothing can be a woman's fault, so that leaves men."
/r/MensRights21/11/17 01:59 AM
17

Let that be a lesson to you. Never again believe the mantra that modern feminism stands for equality between the sexes.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 05:01 PM
1

Gotcha. Same thing!
/r/MensRights19/11/17 08:47 AM
6

It's unfortunate -- that is what modern feminism has become.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 08:27 AM
3

One criticism of the current report: "The dependent variable used in each of the analyses was an offender’s total sentence length, in months, which included alternatives to imprisonment." .... this presumes that there is no bias between for example a woman who receives a non-custodial sentence and a man who receives a custodial sentence. Woman sentenced to house arrest or suspended sentence and man sentenced to prison is the same outcome? Pretty dubious.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 08:10 AM
3

Notably, the USSC methodology does not capture many of the disparities that the method of Sonja Starr does. See my other post.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 08:07 AM
1

Where did you get 40.6%?
/r/MensRights19/11/17 07:59 AM
1

Critically, from the original report referenced in the article: "The Commission’s analysis considered race, gender, citizenship, age, and education level." From the report of Sonja Starr: "logistic regression of an incarceration indicator on gender, arrest offense, criminal history, district, race, age, education level, U.S. citizenship, and the multi-defendant case flag." ... so the analysis by Sonja Starr critically appears to control for variables that the current study did not. This is actua…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 07:49 AM
20

Mauer pointed to research from scholars Sonja Starr and Marit Rehavi, which found that prosecutors “have a huge impact on sentences,” as they have broad discretion in how to charge an offender or whether to offer a plea-bargain. Also, they mentioned Sonja Starr's research, but neglected to mention her findings that after controlling for confounding variables, men are sentenced over 60% longer than women for equivalent crimes, but that the corresponding gap for blacks vs whites was on the order o…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 06:49 AM
1

Good point Yeah, actually thought about that. I wonder what her explanation is for saying that he groped her. It doesn't look like he's groping her in the photo. It looks like he's pretending to grope her. Looks like she is a conservative? If so, he was probably trying to play some mentally abusive game with her. That would be consistent with what the public knows about him. Pretty sadistic guy.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 12:59 AM
2

Yeah, that pretty well sums up the situation...
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:50 PM
1

I think her complaint was more substantially about the kissing and his using his tongue, for which there is no photo evidence.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:49 PM
-2

Naw, you can tell them to fuck off for believing that shit. Say it any time, all the time.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 10:05 AM
1

LOL McCain. That guy is a pandering fuck, a really fucking stupid hero.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:00 AM
1

Politicians are disgusting panderers.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 05:47 AM
1

Sarcasm not appreciated.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 02:20 AM
6

Sue. And keep suing. Then sue them some more.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 02:19 AM
2

The only thing scaring people is her. Not that it bears any explanation, but if she was so scared of him, then why did she refuse to exit his car when her told her to please get out? Get out of my car. Zero points for having a vagina. See how that works? True, she just confirms that she is an even worse person sober than she is drunk. ... declined to press charges: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_z-KzgY3Des sorry? Ridiculous. He should have pressed charges. As you can see, she is also insuffici…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 12:42 AM
0

Are you a fucking retard? Of course he was in fear for his safety. He was being battered.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 12:26 AM
1

Men should rebel, take to the streets and burn their underwear.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 12:25 AM
7

Men should rebel, take to the streets and burn their underwear.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 12:25 AM
1

No, what's gross is being a pederast.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 01:28 PM
1

Correct.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 01:26 PM
1

What an ignorant thing to say. Self defense is not "meting out their own justice." "Meting out their own justice" would be waiting a week, and then punching the person, out of spite. But an immediate response to an ongoing assault? Self defense. In all 50 states. Unless sometimes if your judge is a sexist reptile or a female chauvinist sow, apparently.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 01:23 PM
1

It's always capitalism with you. Is there anything not caused by capitalism? Frankly, I think men have bigger problems.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 07:32 AM
2

Atheist+ is dogshit.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:25 AM
2

I agree. Was she disbarred though? I thought she was fired.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:23 AM
2

The slap lands in the spectrum of pressing charges against her. The same way it would if the situation were reversed. And a punch in self defense is not the same as the type of punch you are talking about You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:23 AM
1

Is that analogous to why atheists did not register to the atheist convention in Australia? If so, I stand corrected. If they just weren't interested, and therefore chose not to pay or register, even better.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 03:31 AM
3

He would if he stood up for men. If he's just going to be contrite and kowtow to feminist for his own shitty behavior, then no. Why would I watch him?
/r/MensRights14/11/17 06:22 PM
3

Seriously. Why not someone like Christina Hoff Sommers? Or any other feminist who is not a complete idiot?
/r/MensRights14/11/17 04:23 PM
2

See if you can help him find a lawyer. You are a good person for helping to defend a vulnerable one from a predator. Always feel good about yourself for what you've done.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 04:13 PM
8

Disgusting. The only acceptable and just alternatives for the legal system in this situation: (a) Charge her only. (b) Charge them both. This justice system is a mockery. Soon, it will be time to burn it down.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 04:06 PM
7

zing
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:38 PM
1

So if the new Star Wars sucks, and I'm not going to bother seeing it, because it sucks, I'm part of a boycott? I don't like okra, therefore I'm part of a boycott? Naw, you've got that wrong. Boycott implies some kind of campaign to shut someone or something down. Is there evidence that this is what happened? As opposed to people being uninterested
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:29 PM
3

It is not possible because Milo has nothing to do with the conference, and he isn't even an atheist. But I bet Milo would gladly take credit for the collapse anyway. Maybe you should e-mail him and make him aware of the opportunity!
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:43 PM
1

It's cruel to put the mentally disabled on public display for ridicule. Unless people are forbidden from ridiculing her. Which would defeat the only purpose for her presence in the first place.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:39 PM
1

People not showing up to your speeches because you suck is not really the same as a boycott. It's simply not showing up to your speeches because you suck.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:32 PM
6

Ah! Another internet psychologist.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:31 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7ctr05/global_atheist_convention_thought_it_would_be_a/dpsnkpf/
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:22 AM
1

... it would have sufficed to say that Clementine Ford it a misandric idiot. No need to bring up Milo, who has nothing to do with anything the fuck with the 2018 Global Atheist Convention. Is he even an Atheist? No.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:21 AM
1

How does Milo end up getting mentioned in any of this? Just virtue signaling I guess?
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:07 AM
6

Because Milo has a great may redeeming characteristics, but Clementine Ford has none.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:05 AM
34

Good. Misandry has no place.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:02 AM
2

True, they do need our support. As does most every bearer of the Y chromosome in these very dark times.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 04:50 AM
9

On the bright side, some women (and some men) will not have an easy time in the future to "sleep their way to the top." Gynocentric dirty old men in the top echelons of management who have abused younger males with large work loads while lavishing females with promotions and other special treatments (for reasons mostly related to what's being secreted in their nut sack), will hopefully be put down to rest imminently. I abhor the lack of due process, but if anything fits the definition of "toxic …
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:07 AM
0

Basically, you don't know anything about this. Not anything useful, anyway.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 11:14 PM
0

Assuming that that you know the OP motive, or lack thereof, and there is nothing else to it.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 09:04 PM
1

Not sure in what way this comment is helpful. What does it accomplish?
/r/MensRights13/11/17 04:11 AM
2

... and sue often.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 10:05 PM
1

Where can we all donate to his case?
/r/MensRights12/11/17 10:05 PM
1

Sue!
/r/MensRights12/11/17 10:01 PM
0

I don't think it makes much sense unless you make some other assumptions...
/r/MensRights12/11/17 10:00 PM
4

OP chose not to link to the original article. I wonder why? Here is the original article: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-chart-shows-that-your-parents-income-determines-your-future-2015-07-24 Looks like the origin of the chart is Pew Trust: http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/assets/2015/07/economicmobilityintheunitedstates.pdf?la=en Caption for the photo states: "The expected incomes of men and women (as functions of their parental income) are estimated nonparametrically. Income variables …
/r/MensRights12/11/17 03:39 PM
6

You'll be fine. Particularly, in Singapore. I hear it's a very safe place.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:42 AM
1

Hope they find out who did it and prosecute.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:37 AM
1

Congratulations! And fantastic job! Hope you were able to tam down the usual plaintive cries from the damseling female contingency. Crybullies are a real problem today, and it's getting worse, not better.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:34 AM
0

Much further than being childishly idealistic.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:29 AM
1

I think the mom is as much to blame as anyone else. Something like this is nothing to commit suicide over...
/r/MensRights12/11/17 04:49 AM
0

I didn't say throw away standards completely. I said, men shouldn't hold themselves to a higher standard -- obviously, meaning higher than women. Congratulations on making an absurd argument.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 04:46 AM
14

Well, you've basically destroyed all of men's institutions, refused to allow men freedom of association to congregate together and support one another. ... you've forced men to eat your amoral garbage postmodernist fuckolababble brainwashing from a young age. You openly revile them and discriminate against them. .. so now you've got a bunch of rudderless, uneducated ("postmodernist" education same thing as no education) men roaming about muddling through life basically on their own. The regressi…
/r/MensRights11/11/17 04:36 PM
1

Female chauvinist sow.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 04:20 PM
2

I've known guys who hold women up on such a high pedestal, that from a young age, they were completely unable to have relationships with them. I've strongly suspected, that some have even turn out to be gay, largely for that reason. That being said, I think MGTOW is reasonable for many people -- particularly in this misandric culture where we now live.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:49 PM
5

"The only time anyone ever tells a guy to 'be a man', is when they are trying to convince him to do something that is not in his best interest." Has the same thing ever been said, to "be a woman?" And what does "be a woman" typically entail? A lot of plaintive cries to convince people to do something that is exactly in a woman's best interest? An interesting contrast. Seems to be so.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:48 PM
-2

When people say this it almost seems like reflection on the imperfect flaws of humanity. Correct. Humanity is imperfect. Time to grow up, little one.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:46 PM
1

Of achievement? That's not what I was talking about. I'm talking about holding yourself to a higher standard of conduct than women, or feminists.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:45 PM
15

Why are men always trying to hold themselves up to a higher standard? Seems like an ordinary standard would suffice.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 06:12 AM
0

Also, being only 1/10th as shitty as feminism means nothing if you are 1/1000 as influential. Better to be a lot more influential, while at the same time shittier.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 06:07 AM
0

I suggest you consider: Since when has being a nice guy ever put a man anywhere but in last place? That old adage is true. I'll just put it out there. You should reflect on yourself, and consider the possibility that you are much much too nice.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 06:06 AM
–

Modern feminism is the most successful civil rights movement of the last 200 years. So I think we're better off basically emulating it. The MRM would be fortunate to be as "shitty" as the feminist movement. I would be very pleased if we were that "shitty." Meanwhile, people in the MRM have been advocating for exactly what you have stated for 100 years. And where are we? Nowhere. Just a bunch of chivalrous jackasses being taken for chumps, pretending as if acting like stoic, reasonable people is …
/r/MensRights11/11/17 05:57 AM
1

I agree with your sentiment. No interview.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 05:38 AM
0

I wouldn't make that assumption. Nope. It's never prudent to make assumptions about rattlesnakes, hungry bears, or feminists. Not unless you are assuming something bad about them.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:21 AM
0

Why? That's dumb. Meanwhile, you've assumed there is a benign reason for it, when there is no rationale or reason offered. Does that sound smart? Or naive?
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:23 PM
2

You have a penis. She doesn't want to hear from you. Does that give you an inkling about where this is headed?
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:08 PM
1

You write up a contract where they must quote you in full without redaction or comment until the end so that nothing can be taken out of context, and establishes large financial penalties for failure to comply. She if she signs it. I doubt she will.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:07 PM
1

We had a pretty good idea. Again, because reputable MRAs knew her personally, and because we knew that feminists had already told her to walk the plank. How many times do I have to repeat myself?
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:07 PM
1

However, we can be polite and document it all and then create a fuss if they misrepresent us. There will be no fuss when they misrepresent us, because they won't listen to us. There is no good reason to engage with an essentially unknown quantity. When were you born?
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:06 PM
1

She has stated in one sentence or two that she "intends" to be fair. Which, from past experience, we know means basically nothing. I repeat, Cassie Jaye came to light once her funding had been pulled by various feminist orgs because she would not commit to parroting feminist biases. We had many reputable MRAs who knew her personally and could vouch for her fairness. So making comparisons there is completely unfounded. You know nothing about the OP on this thread, and you should stop pretending t…
/r/MensRights10/11/17 03:11 PM
0

Actually, I'm fairly sympathetic with BLM. Ironic.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:33 AM
1

Cassie Jaye absolutely stated she would be fair. And we didn't just have her word for it -- we also knew that she had lost financial backing from various feminist sources explicitly because she had committed to being fair and refused to allow her movie to be a biased hit piece on the MRM. Is your memory that short? http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2015/11/03/feminists-are-panicking-and-lashing-out-at-cassie-jayes-the-red-pill-movie/ And MRAs didn't just have Cassie Jaye's word for it that she would…
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:25 AM
1

No, she doesn't give a shit about men who used to be feminists. Because she's a "feminist."
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:54 AM
1

FYI. There is no reason for any MRA to allow himself / herself to be interviewed by anyone who calls themsleves a journalist who is not already known 100% to be a sympathetic supporter or person who will give MRAs a truly fair hearing. If you are seeking out converts in unrelated circumstances, by all means, give it a go. But with a journalist who will be writing up an article, likely to fit their own feminist agenda? That is not a time to "try things out" and see where they end up. Not at all. …
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:53 AM
–

FYI. There is no reason for any MRA to allow himself / herself to be interviewed by anyone who calls themsleves a journalist who is not already known 100% to be a sympathetic supporter or person who will give MRAs a truly fair hearing. If you are seeking out converts in unrelated circumstances, by all means, give it a go. But with a journalist who will be writing up an article, likely to fit their own feminist agenda? That is not a time to "try things out" and see where they end up. Not at all. …
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:53 AM
1

FYI. There is no reason for any MRA to allow himself / herself to be interviewed by anyone who calls themsleves a journalist who is not already known 100% to be a sympathetic supporter or person who will give MRAs a truly fair hearing. If you are seeking out converts in unrelated circumstances, by all means, give it a go. But with a journalist who will be writing up an article, likely to fit their own feminist agenda? That is not a time to "try things out" and see where they end up. Not at all. …
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:53 AM
2

FYI. There is no reason for any MRA to allow himself / herself to be interviewed by anyone who calls themsleves a journalist who is not already known 100% to be a sympathetic supporter or person who will give MRAs a truly fair hearing. If you are seeking out converts in unrelated circumstances, by all means, give it a go. But with a journalist who will be writing up an article, likely to fit their own feminist agenda? That is not a time to "try things out" and see where they end up. Not at all. …
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:52 AM
–

Just delete his post then.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:44 AM
–

Yeah, but MRAs only became involved in her project after they vetted her pretty carefully to be sure she was going to deliver on her promise of giving MRAs fair hearing. You have done no such vetting. Do you even know this person's real name?
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:43 AM
1

Nope. Don't speak to her at all. There are many circumstances where speaking to someone to asses their receptiveness to an MRA viewpoint may a good idea. Speaking to someone who calls themselves a "journalist" is not one of those circumstances where it makes sense to "try it out" and "see how things turn out." Are you dumb?
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:41 AM
2

"I'd like to twist your words, trash you and ridicule in a national magazine" Exactly.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:35 AM
–

There is no reason for any MRA to allow himself / herself to be interviewed by anyone who calls themsleves a journalist who is not already known 100% to be a sympathetic supporter or person who will give MRAS a fair hearing. If your are seeking out converts in unrelated circumstances, by all means, give it a go. But with a journalist who will be writing up an article, likely to fit their own feminist agenda? That is not a time to "try things out" and see where they end up. Not at all. That would…
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:34 AM
2

LOL what a loser PhD.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 09:59 AM
25

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 09:56 AM
1

Chivalry is shit. She should be put away in prison for 40 years.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:44 AM
3

Sue her and sue the university. It's your social duty and responsibility to take that bitch out of commission by having her removed from the school. Set up a Patreon page for your cause.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:40 AM
1

Conceived and implemented by chauvanist pigs and female chauvinist sows.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:38 AM
2

Why?
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:37 AM
–

Oh good god. Yet another brain-dead liberal arts educated "journalist" on the prowl for red meat to tack up and dry for public spectacle. Marie Claire? Isn't that a feminist dishrag? We'd have a better chance at a fair hearing at a Moscow show trial.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:32 AM
1

Can confirm: Blade Runner 2049 is another piece of gynocentric horse shit. I saw it myself. It's another Hollywood junket with cliche plot and tired threadworn male heros whose only existence is for the purpose of rescuing some clam or another. Nowhere near as good as the original. I actually hated Blade Runner 2049.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:28 AM
1

Another day, another damseling shithead. Let her man her own self up -- then let her get the fuck away and forget about her.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:23 AM
1

"The only time anyone ever tells a guy to 'be a man' is when they are trying to convince a guy to do something that is clearly not in his best interest."
/r/MensRights08/11/17 01:15 PM
2

Yes, in the US, the non-custodial parent typically pays income tax on the child support amount. The CS recipient does not. But tax on alimony is paid by the recipient, because adult females are not children, and should be responsible for their own taxes. Period.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 12:37 PM
1

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/mar/09/matrix-director-lilly-wachowski-comes-out-as-a-transgender-woman Let's see, in the school cafeteria today, for the girls we have: empowerment for girls how to break down barriers everyone who criticizes you must be wrong nothing can be your fault; that leaves males wear whatever you want, if a boy even looks at you wrong, smack the proto-rapist here's some money, please spend it And for the boys we have: wait for it wait for it move aside, ladies first…
/r/MensRights07/11/17 04:25 AM
1

Comprehensive sex education? If you are talking about comprehensive sex education: Paternity testing (not just for the unmarried): how to do it where to do it what the process is motherless testing home testing mothers - may not know for certain who the dad is either guessing - not good enough child's appearance as indicator of paternity - same thing as guessing if it's possible the mother might not know who the dad is, give her a specimen for her to test, but don't sign onto anything without ru…
/r/MensRights07/11/17 04:22 AM
1

Core discriminatory treatment of men: (1) Divorce. (2) Child custody. Shared custody. Child support. Bradley Amendment. (3) Criminal sentencing gaps. Unlike the wage gap between males and females, the sentencing gap persists after controlling for confounding variables (e.g. severity of crime, prior criminal record as opposed to profession, experience, work flexibility). The sentencing gap disfavoring males after controlling for confounding variable is on the order of 60%; the corresponding wage …
/r/MensRights07/11/17 04:19 AM
2

A fantastic idea! Love it.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 02:57 AM
1

What a long-winded way to ultimately say that the end user of the funds should pay the taxes on them! Yes but it worse than that. The way it works now, when a woman receives money as a transfer from her ex-husband as an alimony payment, she the one who pays the taxes on it. Setting aside the question of whether alimony should be owed at all, or for how long, this is at least a fair tax system. But this is how they intend to "fix" the tax system. By fucking it up entirely! Just so they can discri…
/r/MensRights07/11/17 02:52 AM
12

Incredible.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:00 AM
1

LOL awesome. A good point will be to bring in cuckservative theory about how the tax incentive for divorcing sluts will "discourage divorce." For that, you'll need someone pretending to be a pastor or religious congressperson to explain it in typical brain damaged fashion, and a real nice seeming "good" girl, conservatively dressed with glasses talking about religion and her pastor and how divorce is bad, but then FUCK IT THERE'S TAX FREE MONEY TO BE HAD... or maybe it's I'm a good girl and don'…
/r/MensRights07/11/17 12:53 AM
1

This is an amazing achievement for "women"... why? Because we wouldn't have wanted another brown woman to win the NYC marathon as has been the case for nearly every other year since 1977? Are these people for real? https://youtu.be/Hitc8haEu_g?t=59
/r/MensRights07/11/17 12:43 AM
1

The latter.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 12:33 AM
1

It's interesting that everyone, perhaps (honestly) including me, greets the statement that white women are the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the planet, as if it were a form of insult. Maybe it should be viewed as a reason for certain people to celebrate, or even express some appreciation. Had you considered it?
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:56 PM
2

He can't do it without a line item veto, which is unconstitutional. Over time, the constitution has been bastardized and undermined. The Congressional swamp regularly bundles legislation into 1,000+ page tomes that can only be passed altogether, or not at all. That is how they get everyone to "eat their medicine" of profligate spending, miasma, carve-outs for special interests, and ordinary day-to-day corruption. They throw a lot of pork into it to grease the wheels, and everything is done not b…
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:40 PM
0

Yup. I am re-christening this the "Republican Divorcing Sluts' Tax Incentive of 2017." Meanwhile, we need a group of female MRAs to troll the cuckservatives and religious right. For a faux YouTube cuckservative campaign commercial, a few female MRAs should dress up like harlots (for a good cause), pretending to be future divorcees who are feverishly awaiting their Republican Tax Incentive for Divorcing Sluts, talking about all the tax-free incentive they will be getting, and how dumb their husba…
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:21 PM
1

So far, Trump has nothing to do with this legislation. And it's not a law, so much as a couple lines that some Congressional fuckers injected into a bill that is going to be about 2,000 pages long. And in case you missed junior high school, in the United States, the US Congress writes the laws and levies taxes. If the swamp wants Trump to be held accountable, they're going to have to separate out the several lines of legislation that are meant to screw over males and give tax free money to divor…
/r/MensRights06/11/17 07:34 PM
0

Yes. And then the religious kooks-in-swamp lied and said this was "family friendly policy" because ostensibly NO woman would be MORE likely to ask for a divorce if her alimony is TAX FREE. No, a divorcing woman's first concern will be, that her soon-to-be ex-husband will be paying a high tax rate on his money, that she spends. Has anyone ever heard of something so stupid? If they're going to shit on males, which is what they are going to do, I'm at least going to hold them to account for it. Dum…
/r/MensRights06/11/17 07:24 PM
1

This was decided after a post with "cuck" in the title reached r/all, and the overall sentiment of the sub - including the OP - was that it was a mistake. Sounds reasonable.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 12:36 PM
1

Sorry, I had the window open, and mistook it for a post in /r/mensrights . Would have had no interest in posting to /r/gendercritical had I known that's what I was doing, because those people are morons.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 12:31 PM
1

"Cuck" itself, though, is a word that is unsympathetic to people who deserve sympathy IMO. That depends. If you are a person who actually think this stuff is a good idea, and you want to force it on other people unwillingly, then you absolutely do not deserve sympathy IMO.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 12:29 PM
-1

Nothing about children is stated, nor is it implied. That would be a completely different discussion, about child support, which is completely separate from alimony. As a matter of fact, divorced men already do pay taxes on the money that they pay in child support, and the women who receive child support already receive it tax free. But adult women are not children, as much as some people wish they should be treated as such when it is convenient for them.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 12:23 PM
1

You've obviously never had to pay alimony. Act like you care about divorced men and educate yourself. I know taxes are boring and it's tempting for plebs to assume that if the swamp wants it, it must be a smart idea. But I'm afraid to inform you, those people actually don't have men's best interest at heart, and you will actually have to use your brain. It's simple really: The way it is now, alimony is not for you, it is for your ex wife. So you don't pay income taxes on it, your ex wife does. T…
/r/MensRights06/11/17 12:06 PM
10

After losing my job back in the recession, much of our marital breakdown came from my unemployment. The world according to women: Married male without job = unemployed. Married woman without a job = "home economist" (the most difficult job on the planet).
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:55 AM
1

Well, just to make a point, the state forcing men to pay alimony to people who take on dicks regularly, possibly quite often in the the very same bed he used to sleep in on a daily basis, pretty much is just that.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:08 AM
1

I's a political party, which in theory can accomplish more for men than a "charity." It probably won't be tax deductible for the OP if that's what he's looking for though. Mike Buchanan is awesome and extremely brave for sure though. More than most could say.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 10:39 AM
1

Oh, don't forget J4MB in the UK. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice_for_Men_and_Boys Mike Buchanan is the bomb.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 03:07 AM
1

BTW what happened to my other post? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7b0zci/swamp_goes_full_cuck_mandates_divorced_men_pay/ ... completely gone from the group. Was it the /r/mensrights mods who did it, or was it stealthed by a Spez?
/r/MensRights06/11/17 02:59 AM
1

Thx. I'd appreciate it.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 11:17 PM
2

You personally have my license to blatantly plagiarize anything I write on /r/mensrights . I cede all copyright on anything I write here to you. For an MRA like you, consider it open sourced.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 11:13 PM
14

It is not a PR problem. Modern feminism is total shit. White women are already the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of planet Earth. However, what (mostly white) feminists do is constantly emit plaintive cries about their pampered and mostly elevated status. Why you might ask? Because a being damseling shithead is apparently what a lot of (again majority white) women are all about. Take Anita Sarkeesian for example. She laments that women are (allegedly) portrayed mo…
/r/MensRights05/11/17 02:02 PM
9

ncfm.org fathers4justice.org avoiceformen.com
/r/MensRights05/11/17 01:59 PM
1

For good inspiration, reach out to Marc Angelucci at the National Coalition for Men. http://ncfm.org/advisor-board/marc-angelucci/ He is an attorney as well as being an outstanding advocate. I'm sure he would be extremely pleased to hear from you.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 03:41 AM
3

I heard a story recently about a woman who had been on a date with a man who was younger than her. After a few drinks, they ended up back at her house. The woman was keen to go to bed with him, but he refused because he was so worried about doing something that might later lead to recriminations. I wouldn't be interested in rubbing smelly bits with sluts anyway. Maybe he was lying to make her feel better. Oh well. Interesting that a young guy gives a reason for not having sex with an old lady, a…
/r/MensRights04/11/17 09:13 AM
2

And the author of the article outright lies and says the opposite: "Arguably, imposing such a substantial tax penalty on divorce could encourage people to stick it out and make their marriages work. " When in fact women who divorce (and it is mostly women who divorce) will be getting MORE money out of a divorce, not less. Chivalry is such ignorant garbage -- it's the only explanation for how this moron Josh Barro could have written anything so dopey. Kick those bastards out of office come 2018. …
/r/MensRights04/11/17 08:54 AM
2

Arguably, imposing such a substantial tax penalty on divorce could encourage people to stick it out and make their marriages work. An enormous, gynocentric, chivalrist, ladies-first, totally sexist lie. The new proposal means that women who divorce will no longer pay tax on their alimony. It will be totally tax free! This means that women, who already initiate divorces twice as often as men, will receive greater financial reward for seeking a divorce (because they no longer have to pay taxes on …
/r/MensRights04/11/17 08:49 AM
1

Most English speakers already have a good approximate idea of what a pederast is. Ephebophile, hebophile, they probably haven't a clue (someone who likes jazz?) -- those are mostly medical terms, not particularly relevant to non-medical discussions. I say, better to stick with what people pretty much already know.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 08:31 AM
1

Ewe!
/r/MensRights04/11/17 01:19 AM
1

http://www.vulture.com/2017/11/kevin-spacey-alleged-sexual-relationship.html
/r/MensRights03/11/17 04:47 PM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights03/11/17 12:19 PM
3

True -- many corporations increase profits when barriers to entry are deployed -- the easiest way for a corporation to erect barriers to entry is by "helping" legislators to deploy hardly effectual regulations that impose large administrative burdens on smaller competitors, that squeeze out smaller and more nimble competitors, and that reduce competition. In other words, regulation. Ignorant anti-corporate common people mistakenly believe that government regulation serves to protect the public f…
/r/MensRights03/11/17 02:58 AM
2

All just lies and bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 07:50 PM
2

Too much regulation, too much threat of lawsuits. Government ruins everything.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 07:50 PM
46

I think Michelle got that backwards.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 06:38 PM
2

Are you asking if women should be held accountable for the transgressions of their male (and female) ancestors? Sure, why not? OK, no then.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 06:37 PM
2

LOL I see what you did there.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 08:40 PM
3

Should include lying about the pill, having tubes tied, poking holes in diaphragms etc..
/r/MensRights31/10/17 08:40 PM
–

It worse than that. Hardy anyone gets killed by staying in the kitchen. The only time anyone ever tells a guy to "be a man" is when they are trying to convince him to do something that is not in his best interest.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 08:27 PM
1

She belong in jail.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:52 AM
1

Apparently, you're part of that demographic though. Not you're fault -- you were born into it. Just a statement of fact.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:49 AM
1

This place was much different a few years ago. It looked like Menslib. LOL no, that's totally wrong. Menslib sucks shit and always has.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:48 AM
1

You could find a real girlfriend, one who isn't 16. Of course, others have piped in that 16 is legal in your state. But still, dating a 16 year-old at your age is pretty ridiculous. Was she 15 or 16 when you started dating? If she was 15, there is a good chance you could go to jail, and for good reason. And if her parents tell her not to hang out with you, which is what I would do if I were them, pretty much you're shit out of luck. A 16 year-old doesn't get to do what she wants.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:46 AM
3

Good. Chivalry is a bunch of crap.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 10:24 PM
1

White women: the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 10:23 PM
4

I hope they have good legal services for men -- what men in these circumstances need more than anything else.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 10:22 PM
1

Chivalry is shit. There is no reason why women should expect to be treated as if they are somehow special.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 10:21 PM
1

Can't see a movie on your own? Good grief.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 10:18 PM
1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=hormone%20AND%20transgender
/r/MensRights29/10/17 10:17 PM
3

"Palmer became completely embroiled in her own web of lies and her appalling behaviour could really have a negative impact on other victims of rape or sexual assault who may choose not to report it to police for fear that they will not be believed." Sympathy should be with the real victim, the poor male who was dragged through this ordeal, almost imprisoned, probably detained, perhaps arrested (false imprisonment) and forced to participate in a trial against his will. No reason to invoke unrelat…
/r/MensRights29/10/17 01:46 PM
3

Im all for that. Put 'em right on the front lines with everyone else.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 05:16 AM
3

That page is shit. Any discussion that does not go over law on a state-by-state basis, or per hospital policy, isn't worth a grain of salt. Unless there is a Supreme Court ruling on male sterilization / vasectomy (there is one on tubal ligation, and the article makes no mention of a Supreme Court decision), Federal law has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 04:59 AM
1

Unfortunately, the Catholic church has recently pretty much taken the side of all of those groups against what remains of the reasonable people in this world. Screw all of 'em -- one big matriarchal shithole.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 04:52 AM
1

That's just about the dumbest thing I've read today.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 04:46 AM
1

Screw 'em. Leave and tell them why.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 04:45 AM
2

Comprehensive sex education? If you are talking about comprehensive sex education: Paternity testing (not just for the unmarried): how to do it where to do it what the process is motherless testing home testing mothers - may not know for certain who the dad is either guessing - not good enough child's appearance as indicator of paternity - same thing as guessing if it's possible the mother might not know who the dad is, give her a specimen for her to test, but don't sign onto anything without ru…
/r/MensRights26/10/17 01:08 PM
2

Treatment of young men by college administrators. Complete absence of due process. Start tribunals. Men being kicked out after being subjected to the exact same sexual misconduct at the hands of their accuser as the accuser accuses of them. Rare moment of honesty from a elite university Dean of Students... What if both the man and the woman are drunk?... "Assuming it is a male and female, it is the responsibility in the case of the male to gain consent before proceeding with sex." The general de…
/r/MensRights26/10/17 01:06 PM
2

Core discriminatory treatment of men: (1) Divorce. (2) Child custody. Shared custody. Child support. Bradley Amendment. (3) Criminal sentencing gaps. Unlike the wage gap between males and females, the sentencing gap persists after controlling for confounding variables (e.g. severity of crime, prior criminal record as opposed to profession, experience, work flexibility). The sentencing gap disfavoring males after controlling for confounding variable is on the order of 60%; the corresponding wage …
/r/MensRights26/10/17 01:06 PM
2

CHILD CUSTODY: http://tomjameslaw.com/blog/what-judges-really-think-about-fathers-responses-to-court-commissioned-judicial-bias-surveys/#fn-853-13 CRIMINAL SENTENCING: Criminal sentencing gaps. Unlike the wage gap between males and females, the sentencing gap persists after controlling for confounding variables (e.g. severity of crime, prior criminal record as opposed to profession, experience, work flexibility). The gender sentencing gap is enormous (60%) and much greater than the sentencing ga…
/r/MensRights26/10/17 01:05 PM
10

White women: the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of the planet. Note also, her profile says she is a mom "and stepmom". Which means she is writing nostalgically in a public forum about her ex-husband while married to some other guy. Gross. She sounds manipulative.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 07:38 AM
2

I love Mike Buchanan.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 07:34 AM
1

Most of that cannot be negotiated in a prenup. See my discussion elsewhere in this thread.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 07:24 AM
1

A few thins you must do: (1) She must have a lawyer to review the document. It would be reasonable for you to pay for her lawyer to defray the cost. If she has no lawyer at the time she signs, it will be thrown out. (2) You need to make sure to have the document completed and signed very far in advance of the wedding, or else she could subsequently claim it was signed under duress, and the document could be thrown out. (3) A lawyer will know which terms are allowable in your state and which are …
/r/MensRights25/10/17 07:20 AM
1

Now, the male one is probably higher as most guys will just leave and get out easier than a woman in fear of them calling the cops. LOL obviously, these people never been held hostage in a marriage, or by a bigoted anti-male family court system that will take your children away from a man based on bigoted presumptions without a second thought.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 07:06 AM
29

My list: If you are talking about comprehensive sex education: Paternity testing (not just for the unmarried): how to do it where to do it what the process is motherless testing home testing mothers - may not know for certain who the dad is either guessing - not good enough child's appearance as indicator of paternity - same thing as guessing if it's possible the mother might not know who the dad is, give her a specimen for her to test, but don't sign onto anything without running your own test …
/r/MensRights24/10/17 02:24 AM
1

The courts are disgusting to allow a woman to falsely imprison a man for 11 months yet only imprison her for three. Totally disgusting.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 02:44 PM
6

So "Halloween" becomes "family fun day" and only only women are invited. I would go anyway. Then sue when you are not allowed to attend with your child.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 10:42 AM
3

Schools are run by sexist pigs nd female chauvinist sows these days. You should sue.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 10:39 AM
1

And so?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 10:32 AM
1

Oh get over it.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 02:19 AM
1

https://archive.fo/4ZTom
/r/MensRights19/10/17 08:08 AM
3

Ask for a paternity test.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 08:02 AM
12

Controlling wives -- yes. And much of our current culture actually eggs them on. Horrible behavior. I love Peter Lloyd.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 08:00 AM
1

Cut her off.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 10:08 AM
1

In other words: a woman can be a predator who sleeps her way to the top, yet still be cast as the victim when it suits her. Not saying that's what happened in the case of Harvey Weinstein, but the problem with a witch hunt, is that clear distinctions are almost never made.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 10:06 AM
2

“The first question they ( her kids) had about it [was], ‘Is that true?’” The simple answer is: on average, it may be true, but people are to be treated as individuals, not according to the group or demographic that they belong. And even so far as the averages are concerned, it's not at all certain how much of it is true because of innate differences in the biology of the brain, vs. different choices men & women make as children and adults. No matter what, anyone who tries really hard is going t…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 10:03 AM
1

Everyone is equal, but some are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 05:43 AM
18

Western countries are bigoted matriarchal shithholes. Amanda Spielman is a female chauvinist sow.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 02:15 PM
1

Part-time stay-at-home dad here. Without a doubt, being a stay-at-home parent is the easiest "job" I have ever had in my entire life. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-Y1Pbp0GnY
/r/MensRights13/10/17 02:05 PM
2

https://archive.fo/lLtwG
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:28 AM
1

No, it's not. https://www.inquisitr.com/4053164/viagra-government-funded-pregnancy-birth-control-sildenafil/
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:57 AM
1

No, it's not. https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/21/obamacare-contraception-mandate-in-jeopardy/ http://www.factcheck.org/2008/07/mccains-viagra-moment/
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:42 AM
7

Birth control pills should not be available? But they are available. Much more reliably available than Viagra, actually. Abortions... also fairly widely available. What's her point here? Comparing the piddly $41 million spent on Viagra to the billions upon billions upon billions spent on women's health? When in fact, the vast majority of men who have erectile dysfunction actually have no prescription coverage for a drug that would enable them to have a normal sex life? Medicare part D generally …
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:06 AM
2

Chivalry is shit.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:49 AM
1

A woman criticizes politicians, because the Federal government spends a measly $46 million per year on a disorder that affects 10-20 million men every year, and you think this is not a men's rights issue? In contrast, Americans spend approximately $4 billion on oral contraceptives per year. There is no "ladies first" in men's rights bro.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:35 AM
1

Actually, there is no federal mandate for Viagra, many private insurers and employers choose not to provide coverage for Viagra, and Medicare Part D usually provides no coverage for Viagra.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:14 AM
1

Actually, there is no federal mandate for Viagra, many private insurers and employers choose not to provide coverage for Viagra, and Medicare Part D usually provides no coverage for Viagra.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:14 AM
1

This lie again! There is no Federal mandate for Viagra. Private insurers and employers are free to provide coverage for Viagra, or not. A good number of insurers actually do not provide coverage for Viagra, or or provide for only one or two pills per week. As for Medicare / Medicaid, I doubt the US Federal government does not have a mandate on Viagra either. Medicare parts A and B provide no prescription coverage. Part D you would to pay for in order to get prescription coverage, but "Currently …
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:09 AM
2

Who the hell cares what they look like?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:55 PM
5

Nothing wrong with bromance.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 01:42 PM
3

What warning? His face is right there on the front of the page. You can't see it? I love Paul Elam.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 03:13 AM
1

Boy Scouts: Yet another gynocentric shithole.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 03:11 AM
6

Boy Scouts: - yet another gynocentric shithole. Won't be sending my sons there.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 02:50 AM
1

No, I'm not splitting hairs. There is no average person. That's a non-mathematical lay term that has no defined real-life meaning at this time. Average with respect to what, specifically? Then you've gone and conflated something that has to do with causation -- inborn lifespan independent of environment / behavior -- with your own examples, which all have to do with environment / behavior ("nutrients"). "Women live longer" is as meaningless as the concept as the average person. That's the point …
/r/MensRights11/10/17 02:14 PM
1

Bollocks. The statement that women live longer than men is an observational statement based on observable fact. The average lifespan of a female is longer than that of a male. The median lifespan of a female is longer than that of a male. People may debate as to why this is (e.g. nature vs. behavior vs. environment), but nonetheless, for whatever reason, these are both true statements. And, it is untrue to suggest that women do not live longer than men. I'll introduce another example, but this t…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 10:43 AM
2

Mary Koss is a female chauvinist sow.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:07 PM
1

Two things, I'm not talking about the median at all. Then what the hell are you talking about? Except maybe nothing.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 02:56 PM
1

You're confusing median with average. And yes, the median age at death for women is still longer than the median age at death for men. This is not difficult to measure.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 12:11 PM
1

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 12:06 PM
3

Most male feminists are disgusting pigs.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:14 AM
2

Most male feminists are disgusting pigs.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:13 AM
1

Dos anybody know this for a fact or are people just speculating?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:11 AM
2

Sue those sexist pigs and female chauvinist sows.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:05 AM
1

"He is a good, kind person and when, and if, he's ready [to be in her life], then he'll always be welcome. Decent woman.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 10:56 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 02:13 AM
1

Yeah, don't get back with her. Amazingly, some would regard elements of her behavior as a "woman's prerogative."
/r/MensRights05/10/17 11:04 AM
5

Charles Payne, host of “Making Money” on Fox Business and Scottie Nell Hughes, a political commentator, had a 2 year long sexual affair.... According to The Los Angeles Times, Mrs. Hughes told her lawyer, that she stayed in the relationship with Payne because she believed he would help her chances of landing a position at Fox network. So now, predatory "sleeping your way to the top" behaviors become, "I was abused, give me money." Nothing can be a woman's fault, so that leaves men. Damseling shi…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 11:01 AM
1

Use the ladies room.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 10:54 AM
3

If a young man and a young woman are equally drunk, and have sex, if the young man wakes in the morning and says: ‘I really didn’t want that’, little will, or does, happen to the female lying next to him. They are either both rapists, or neither. Secondly, the fact alcohol may have affected his belief is no defence. Nor would her being affected by alcohol a defense to her being a rapist. I am not calling for a law change. But you should be calling for a change in the way law is administered. May…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 10:53 AM
2

What an asshole.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 10:25 AM
4

Why stop there? Let people who identify as men enroll too.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 01:16 AM
11

Women's studies departments should be abolished. At this point, they serve no purpose other than to institutionalize bigotry against men.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 09:49 PM
1

If she says she is pregnant, it is probably based on a urine pregnancy test, possibly in addition to ultrasound. The testing is highly accurate. Just FYI, ultrasound does not predict paternity. There are some companies that market paternity tests that can be performed prior to the birth of the child. Some companies market tests that are able to isolate feta DNA from the mother's blood sample (without doing CVS / amniocentesis). Not sure on the technicalities, but you'd have to inquire with those…
/r/MensRights03/10/17 03:36 AM
1

True.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 03:27 AM
12

Orwellian.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 09:28 PM
1

It's designed to imply injustice where there is none.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 02:26 AM
9

Propaganda.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 02:26 AM
1

We live in a disgusting matriarchy.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 02:22 AM
6

Decriminalize male steroid hormones. I'm all for it.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 02:20 AM
4

Report to police, refuse to press charges.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 02:00 AM
3

Universities are still misandric shitholes.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:06 PM
1

http://www.revolucionantifeminista.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/lawrence-shannon-the-predatory-female.pdf
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:02 AM
21

Because they have an awful feminist named Alison Saunders as Director of Public Prosecutions for the last four years. One major reason why, anyways.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:38 AM
8

Just use the ladies room. Screw them.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:14 AM
1

I hope she was arrested afterwards.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 11:24 PM
0

Because left wing parties hate men, and frequently discriminate against them.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 05:19 AM
1

Has the world gone entirely mad?
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:39 AM
6

That judge is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:31 AM
2

But she's so smart! Gag.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:29 AM
4

If he hasn't already, he should inquire with the Innocence Project for legal assistance. https://www.innocenceproject.org/ This sounds terrible.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:28 AM
1

Thx some good references there. Wish there were more. It's not studied enough.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:26 AM
4

Also, family courts in Western democracies keep family court decisions largely under wraps, which conveniently prevent researchers from studying outcomes and identifying biases. Secret courts are by definition a violation of civil liberties.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:14 AM
1

How is this controversial? Is there any reason to like male bashers?
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:12 AM
3

A lot of ignorance on display in that article. If she wants to succeed in STEM, she should apply singleminded focus to coding and stop writing articles in her school newspaper. Too stereotypically female, she should try not to let her "damseling femininity" (the female analog of "toxic masculinity") cause her to be diverted from coding. Sad. Lots of good responses in comments.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:10 AM
2

Yes that would be preferable.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:04 AM
12

If a man were as demanding as a great many women are in relationships, he would be considered a "controlling and emotionally abusive monster."
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:04 AM
2

The way I figure it, a reasonable policy is for a man or woman to be allowed to ask once. If denied, desist.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:02 AM
16

Ladies first means men last. Long live men's rights.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:00 AM
4

"I will note that for many years of my early twenties I considered myself a men's rights activists and have turned past boyfriends and male friends on to the healthier side of the movement. I do not identify as a feminist. I frequent red pill women." Interesting. Well, at least she is familiar with the issues. They'll work it out. When my fiance says that housework and parenting isn't real work, and isn't remotely like a full time job, I think to myself how even my 14hr/day data scientist job wa…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:28 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:21 AM
2

If it is true as you say that "actions/beliefs of RADICAL feminists" do not represent the whole, then I hate to disappoint you, but then it is radical feminists who have their grasp on the institutional power in this country and who are regularly instituting highly misandrist policies. Sure, not all feminists are like that, but sorry to disappoint, but it's impossible for any honest, dedicated men's rights activist to let that pass without deserved criticism. does nothing to help Men's Rights be…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:18 AM
1

This is what feminists are talking about when they claim that we "don't need a men's rights movement because feminism already stand up for the equal rights of men." Female chauvinist sows, they are.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:11 AM
3

Sarcasm is not appreciated. Believe it or not, a lot of people reading here will think you actually mean it.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:10 AM
1

Yup.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:59 PM
1

Awesome movie. Good luck.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 01:17 PM
2

Nice. While there is a difference between average earnings of men and women in the United States, these differences are not due to discrimination. There are many reputable studies that demonstrate that the gender wage gap evaporates to nearly nothing once confounding variables are factored in. The residual small amounts remaining wage gap are just as likely to be secondary to non-discriminatory factors that the studies cannot precisely measure or control. Studies that reveal that the wage gap is…
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:08 AM
2

You need a lawyer familiar with laws and courts in your state. Yes, drug testing is sometimes admissible. If legal in your state, always be recording. Look up single party consent vs. dual party consent, also whether reasonable expectation of privacy applies in your state.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:06 AM
3

You need a lawyer. He will be familiar with laws in your state.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:02 AM
10

Dump her. Also, if legal in your state, always be recording. Look up single party vs dual party consent, and the concept of reasonable expectation of privacy.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:00 AM
1

Hire a lawyer and sue the paper for defamation.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 06:57 AM
9

A TALENTED young boxer who made a false rape accusation which resulted in a man being arrested had insulted the real victims of sexual assault ... Forget about insults, a man was forcibly detained / falsely imprisoned and threatened for five hours because of her intentional false actions. Off to prison you go.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 07:18 PM
2

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 07:15 PM
1

Not a very well-written article.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 07:14 PM
1

White women: the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 06:14 PM
1

Start a local men's group. Invite like minded people and start a community.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 06:12 PM
1

"Nothing can be a woman's fault, so that leaves men."
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:25 PM
11

Good.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 06:12 AM
7

White women: the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 06:03 AM
18

So much for the existence of "moderate feminism."
/r/MensRights26/09/17 04:30 AM
3

Kafkaesque. It's now a Title IX violation to disagree with a woman.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 04:23 AM
1

Not surprising. This debunks the myth that we live in a "patriarchy" that somehow disadvantages females. In truth, we live in a matriarchy, where gynocentric damseling females and chivalrist plonker males elect chivalrous alpha males, who then go about the business of mistreating and discriminating against men.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 04:22 AM
1

Get a lawyer. Now.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 04:53 PM
1

Yes but pot, kettle, black.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 04:50 PM
1

Reference book of men’s issues: https://www.reddit.com/r/rbomi/wiki/main
/r/MensRights25/09/17 04:55 AM
2

Pay Gap: Yes, it's absolutely true that over their careers, on average, women earn somewhat less than men. However, the reason for this has nothing to do with discrimination. In fact, this is more to do with women being comparatively privileged in society, having more options to to balance work and life, and being more often financially supported by their male partners, leaving women options to pursue activities that may be less remunerative but more fulfilling. It has to do with the careers and…
/r/MensRights25/09/17 04:52 AM
2

Sexist & the "Women are wonderful" effect Rudman & Goodwin (2004) conducted research on gender bias that measured gender preferences without directly asking the participants. Subjects at Purdue and Rutgers participated in computerized tasks that measured automatic attitudes based on how quickly a person categorizes pleasant and unpleasant attributes with each gender. Such a task was done to discover whether people associate pleasant words (good, happy, and sunshine) with women, and unpleasant wo…
/r/MensRights25/09/17 04:51 AM
2

Criminal sentencing gaps. Unlike the wage gap between males and females, the sentencing gap persists after controlling for confounding variables (e.g. severity of crime, prior criminal record as opposed to profession, experience, work flexibility). The gender sentencing gap is enormous (60%) and much greater than the sentencing gap for race (~10%). For comparison, the corresponding wage gap after controlling for confounding variables is less than 5%. Particularly horrible, given feminism's track…
/r/MensRights25/09/17 04:50 AM
2

I'm actually very content with my life. Thanks for your concern.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 04:48 AM
1

Chances are marrying her would be a mistake. You can find better. So dump her, and move on. t's just more damseling shitheadery from feminists. Yes, it's absolutely true that over their careers, on average, women earn somewhat less than men. However, the reason for this has nothing to do with discrimination. In fact, this is more to do with women being comparatively privileged in society, having more options to to balance work and life, and being more often financially supported by their male pa…
/r/MensRights25/09/17 02:50 AM
10

"Nothing can be a woman's fault, so that leaves men."
/r/MensRights25/09/17 02:47 AM
5

It's unacceptable that discrimination against males has become established practice at large corporations.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 02:38 AM
2

Right, don't kill people.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 02:12 AM
4

No. Read the bottom of the two posters,
/r/MensRights25/09/17 02:12 AM
1

It doesnt matter which gender you are, abuse is abuse. True. But pot, kettle, black.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 02:10 AM
1

Oh shut up already.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 02:09 AM
2

California schools are full of disgusting people.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 02:03 AM
3

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 02:00 AM
17

Core discriminatory treatment of men: (1) Divorce. (2) Child custody. Shared custody. Child support. Bradley Amendment. (3) Criminal sentencing gaps. Unlike the wage gap between males and females, the sentencing gap persists after controlling for confounding variables (e.g. severity of crime, prior criminal record as opposed to profession, experience, work flexibility). The sentencing gap disfavoring males after controlling for confounding variable is on the order of 60%; the corresponding wage …
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:56 AM
1

Anita Sarkeesian, the damsel-in-distress trope.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 03:25 PM
1

I see more female who are control freaks in relationships than I see men who are control freaks in relationships.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 03:24 PM
1

Uh. No.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 07:08 AM
2

Women.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 02:52 AM
1

Read the posts.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 02:48 AM
1

Wow, a female chauvinist sow in a Title IX office! Who would have guessed?
/r/MensRights24/09/17 02:47 AM
1

Why would it be a "trolling" sub?
/r/MensRights24/09/17 02:43 AM
24

First things first. Paternity test. Always. Never have your name placed on a birth certificate until you've had a DNA test, or calamitous things may result. Some states may hold a man responsible for child support, even when the child is not his. Laws vary by state. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=paternity+fraud&t=ffsb&ia=web Never, ever sign an acknowledgement of paternity form and never have your name placed on a birth certificate until a DNA test confirms a child is actually your child. Never, no …
/r/MensRights24/09/17 02:36 AM
1

"Beyond a reasonable doubt." Yes, this would be applicable for cases referred to police for criminal prosecutions. There is good argument that this should be the default process.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 12:47 AM
1

great!
/r/MensRights24/09/17 12:46 AM
2

True. I wouldn't be surprised by that either, these days.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 09:55 PM
2

The point of the male parking lot attendant and female child care worker was that people are paid more to watch an object in a parking lot than an actual human bean that will shape the future. That's just your pretentious prejudice against "manual labor" showing through. What you say is irrelevant. Jobs are a market defined only in little part by "social value", but also by revenue generated and by supply and demand. Put simply, more people would rather provide low-skill baby sitting to a couple…
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:19 PM
4

Kids are fun, if you'd have the chance to be around them. Of course, you may choose not to in this "listen and believe" environment when it comes to false allegations against men. Which you would be correct to take into account.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:13 PM
–

In fact, the AAUW's own research suggests that only about 7% of the observed pay gap can be attributed to discrimination. Just because studies are unable to account for all factors that lead to differences in pay, does not mean that all residual pay differences are due to discrimination. It is just as likely that the residual 7% is due to factors that have not or are unable to be controlled for, as it is due to discrimination. A difference of 7% is not particularly reliable or useful in a non-ra…
/r/MensRights23/09/17 12:21 PM
1

No doubt!
/r/MensRights23/09/17 12:10 PM
1

Much more masculophobia than effeminophobia in our culture these days, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 12:10 PM
6

I support Milo.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:17 AM
2

I'm keeping my fingers crossed for a policy mandating "clear and convincing evidence" standard, along with other due process reinstatements.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:10 AM
1

Bring a lawyer. The Title IX "Dear Colleague" letter is rescinded. Assert your rights.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:08 AM
4

I'm keeping my fingers crossed for a policy mandating "clear and convincing evidence" standard, along with other due process reinstatements.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:08 AM
1

I'm keeping my fingers crossed for a policy mandating "clear and convincing evidence" standard, along with other due process reinstatements.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:07 AM
1

I'm keeping my fingers crossed for a policy mandating "clear and convincing evidence" standard, along with other due process reinstatements.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:07 AM
4

I'm keeping my fingers crossed for a policy mandating "clear and convincing evidence" standard, along with other due process reinstatements.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:05 AM
1

You're not surprised are you?
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:01 AM
1

Not really a men's rights issue, but I'm posting it because of all the men's bathrooms being turned into all gender, I was talking about when there is a dedicated women's room, but no dedicated men's room.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 10:16 PM
1

Just use the ladies' room.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:06 PM
17

less fair sex Sexist pigs. "The quality of countrymen is too low for this kind of thing.." Opposite. They stand up for equal rights. This is good.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:06 PM
3

Add in all those men who are forced to pay unreasonable alimony, or child support for children they would much rather be caring for themselves.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:03 PM
5

Fucking awesome.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:02 PM
1

Northeastern university Are we to believe that police are diligent about fully investigating and labeling reports as false, when police and prosecutors routinely refuse to charge false accusers with crimes related to false reporting? Of course not. Police have no interest in identifying false accusers and bringing them to justice. And of course we have 44.9% of cases where the police appear to be unable to determine whether or not a crime occurred. Keep in mind the saying, that "a grand jury cou…
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:51 AM
1

See? I presented evidence No, you didn't. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWr39Q9vBgo
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:33 AM
1

Fallacy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:33 AM
16

I agree. Complain to the principal, and if nothing is done, go to the school board.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 07:45 PM
6

Female chauvinist sow should not be allowed to teach children.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 07:45 PM
3

No thanks.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 06:24 PM
7

Sorry, I've lost my sense of humor on this one.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 06:10 PM
1

Yeah, that's bullcrap.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 06:09 PM
2

aaa
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:10 PM
1

Actually, no. The best is to be well-versed in all the statistics and present them succinctly and well.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:00 PM
1

While there is a difference between average earnings of men and women in the United States, these differences are not due to discrimination. There are many reputable studies that demonstrate that the gender wage gap evaporates to nearly nothing once confounding variables are factored in. The residual small amounts remaining wage gap are just as likely to be secondary to non-discriminatory factors that the studies cannot precisely measure or control. Studies that reveal that the wage gap is narro…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:58 PM
1

aaa
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:55 PM
1

Criminal sentencing gaps. Unlike the wage gap between males and females, the sentencing gap persists after controlling for confounding variables (e.g. severity of crime, prior criminal record as opposed to profession, experience, work flexibility). The gender sentencing gap is enormous (60%) and much greater than the sentencing gap for race (~10%). For comparison, the corresponding wage gap after controlling for confounding variables is less than 5%. Particularly horrible, given feminism's track…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:39 PM
1

Use archive.is, nimwit! https://archive.fo/bxMYp
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:38 PM
1

Which claims specifically? It would be helpful if you narrowed the question a little bit, since that would be a lot of ground to cover.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:36 PM
1

Disgusting sexism.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:35 PM
1

The preponderance of evidence standard is also survivor-centered. Exactly the problem. The evidence standard should be centered neither on accuser or on the accused. It should be objective and unbiased. When judging whether someone has been raped, it’s almost impossible to assert that a sex act constituted violence “beyond a reasonable doubt.” So deceitful. The prevailing standard on college campuses prior to 2011 was neither the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, nor the "preponderance of ev…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:21 PM
1

Mr Clare said she was a 'vulnerable individual' with a number of health problems and suffered from chronic fatigue syndrome. More playing victim. Sorry, the real victim is the 12 year-old you molested. Good to see she sentenced. Let's hope she serves her full term.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 01:06 PM
6

The vast majority of modern slavery victims are men who are paying alimony, or child support for children they would much rather be taking care of themselves.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:48 AM
5

Or was this just another case of some girl being so narcissistic and entitled that she felt justified in ruining a man's life because he somehow "disrespected" her? Sounds like that. "Nothing can be a woman's fault, so that leaves men."
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:47 AM
1

Gah.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:41 AM
1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19554969 "Information about potential confounding variables and effect modifiers was available from the questionnaire that subjects completed at enrollment and from publicly available data ." In other words, potentially influenced by a lot of bias. case-cohort approach A sucky study design, particularly when combined with survey data. Unless there are large effect sizes, the results should not be considered a reliable policy indicator even if statistically sig…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:35 AM
3

** Opens
/r/MensRights20/09/17 07:39 PM
1

Joe Biden: antediluvian sexist chivalrist pig.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 07:36 PM
2

The usual lies from damseling sexist snowflakes.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:37 PM
1

Being in a woman's prison, in comparison to being in a men's prison, is much like being in a spa.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:30 PM
13

"Nothing can be a woman's fault, so that leaves men."
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:27 PM
6

Depends where you are / what state you live in. Don't generalize.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:27 PM
1

Nice link!
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:29 AM
1

Don't be critical if you're not going to watch it.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:25 AM
5

That sounds nice. Interesting though. Why is women's benefit a prerequisite for liberating men? Isn't men's liberation and ends in itself?
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:24 AM
4

There is also cctv but I dont think I can get it without police or lawyer. Don't leave it up to chance. Get police involved ASAP and have the video preserved as evidence. This is not funny.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:22 AM
5

It's just more damseling shitheadery from feminists. Yes, it's absolutely true that over their careers, on average, women earn somewhat less than men. However, the reason for this has nothing to do with discrimination. In fact, this is more to do with women being comparatively privileged in society, having more options to to balance work and life, and being more often financially supported by their male partners, leaving women options to pursue activities that may be less remunerative but more f…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:15 AM
2

"We hate women; come see us and find out what you might do so we'll hate you less." Imagine if that's the introduction University administrators gave women when they arrived on campus. No difference really.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:01 AM
6

Feminists are bigots.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 04:48 PM
12

Females, not special.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 04:47 PM
1

LOL Police custody in the course of investigation quite literally is not false imprisonment It can be. Often, even when it is intentional and deliberate (not the case here), little is done because of sovereign immunity. But the very clear matter is, this woman intentionally and willfully lied to authorities to have a man physically detained on false pretenses. Whether the letter of the law recognizes it or not, she used police as her unwitting but nonetheless physical surrogates to commit a fals…
/r/MensRights19/09/17 04:01 PM
1

You don't know the meaning of false imprisonment. It needn't involve a prison, a closed room, a locked door, or anything of the sort. It needn't involve police: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_imprisonment "False imprisonment occurs when a person is restricted in their personal movement within any area without justification or consent. For example, when two people are kept on a plane when an investigation into missing apparatus arises. Actual physical restraint is not necessary to a false im…
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:45 PM
1

It is rational. That's exactly what it is. Drunk and disorderlies are not falsely imprisoned, because there is a legitimate reason for their detention.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 12:34 PM
1

OK then. What's the proof? Which are the environmental toxins that are poisoning Americans today?
/r/MensRights19/09/17 06:48 AM
10

If young men were dressing the way girls are, chivalrist plonkers would be pissed.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 06:47 AM
0

https://archive.fo/EK3tk
/r/MensRights18/09/17 09:50 PM
2

https://archive.fo/EK3tk
/r/MensRights18/09/17 09:50 PM
2

Chivalrist plonkers deserve to be cast out of business everywhere.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 09:49 PM
3

Chivalrist plonkers deserve to be cast out of business everywhere.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 09:49 PM
0

https://archive.fo/ChVSS
/r/MensRights18/09/17 09:46 PM
1

Leeds Crown Court heard the driver, a father-of-five, was tracked down and kept in custody for six hours. False imprisonment a violent crime. She was jailed for 16 months. Sounds appropriate. Let's see how much she actually serves. Hopefully at least a year. Denise Breen-Lawton, mitigating, said Pointon... had been studying in Leeds at the time. She said her hopes of becoming a police officer were now ruined. Not mitigating. Pointon should NEVER be allowed to become a police officer. Not under a…
/r/MensRights18/09/17 09:36 PM
1

I'm all for safe spaces for men. What's safe about this crap though?
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:40 PM
1

Blood is thicker than water. Never play pseudodad for anyone it's not worth the time nor the effort.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:38 PM
6

No. Equality is just that. Women are not special.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:06 PM
3

https://archive.fo/Cl6q8 "Nothing can be a woman's fault, so that leaves men."
/r/MensRights18/09/17 04:55 PM
0

https://archive.fo/s0E6a
/r/MensRights18/09/17 01:11 PM
3

mock trials In other words, complete bullcrap. The research also claimed that 43 per cent of jurors ‘make their decision in advance’, by which they mean that deliberations with fellow jurors did not change their view of the evidence In other words, less than half of jurors made their decisions solely based on the evidence presented to them. Fully 57% caved to pressures exacted on them by peers in the jury. It would give me more confidence if the 43% were much higher. It also suggested that educa…
/r/MensRights18/09/17 12:46 PM
2

Summary: Female has to contend with the everyday concerns that everyone, either male or female, has to contend with. Anyone who believe that women are less safe in this country than are men, needs to open their eyes and join reality. Another day, another datelining shithead.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 12:39 PM
1

Depends how you do it. Doesn't necessarily have to be video either.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 12:35 PM
6

Orwellian.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 12:28 PM
1

Yeah being a young male particularly sucks. My advice: (1) Remember, the only time anyone ever tells a guy to "be a man", is when they are trying to convince him to do something that is not in is best interest. (2) Try to do what is in your best interest and don't be ashamed or guilt-ridden about it. (3). Read this book: http://www.revolucionantifeminista.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/lawrence-shannon-the-predatory-female.pdf . Several times.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 04:27 AM
2

First things first -- he should insist on a paternity test. Otherwise, there is no way to know if he is the dad, or not.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 04:19 AM
3

https://archive.fo/pTcZ2
/r/MensRights18/09/17 04:13 AM
1

That's not what they are learning in history though. The study of history, in universities, particularly these days, is really about teaching students to be "right thinking" politically correct people. It's not about history, really.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 04:04 AM
1

But as the saying goes, those who fail history are doomed to repeat it. As an example of what poor instruction historians provide on the past "informing our future": American Indians were unable to stop unrestricted immigration onto their territories and sometimes welcomed it -- now many of them live on reservations. Australian aboriginals subjected to unrestricted immigration by colonists -- similar fate. Russians migrating to Crimea -- now it belongs to Russia. Unrestricted migration of Zionis…
/r/MensRights18/09/17 02:42 AM
1

Thousands of people have gotten respiratory diseases such as asthma due to breathing air containing too much smog. Actually, the strongest correlate for developing asthma, is growing up in an environment that is too clean and that is devoid of antigens. This is related to the immunologic phenomenon known as anergy. People with the lowest rates of asthma are those that grew up on farms around animals and other antigens in the environment. It says a lot that as people are living in environments th…
/r/MensRights18/09/17 01:52 AM
1

I'm not familiar with the entertainment industry, but my feeling is that there is a glut of unqualified people trying to "make it", and a shortage of actual trained talent. It's got nothing to do with training. If you've actually seen trained university student projects in the performance arts (I have seen a fair amount of it), you would know. .. or so they can realize that it isn't for them. No, the government shouldn't be paying people to navel gaze and self explore for non-productive purposes…
/r/MensRights18/09/17 12:31 AM
1

Performance may be a big area, but it's not something that requires the support of universities in order to sustain the industry. If anything, for a long time, we have a massive glut of young people gravitating towards the performance arts. Environmental studies is not particularly critical, nor is it useful. If anything, the United States is much over-regulated from the environmental perspective. If there is a role for environmental studies, it is in guiding the field towards dubunking the ream…
/r/MensRights18/09/17 12:05 AM
6

"Take the issue up with the powerful men who are lording it over the less powerful men, the woman, and the children." I'll take it up with the damseling shithead females who enforce social presumptions of chivalry and deference to female interests, and who elevate chivalrist douchebag males to apex positions in the social hierarchy. Never forget, the most common form a matriarchy takes: http://i.livescience.com/images/i/000/037/099/i02/african-lion-pride.jpg?1361809335 The MO of a damseling shit…
/r/MensRights17/09/17 11:21 PM
1

'If we're graduating 250 people out of our engineering school...why is it 250 and not 1,000? And what are we going to do between now and 2030 and a whole lot sooner to make sure it's 1,000?’” This is true. Public funding for education in performance arts, English literature, environmental studies, history, "peace and justice studies", philosophy, religious studies, and yes women's studies, should be completely cut. Anytime the government is subsidizing / encouraging youth to commit their careers…
/r/MensRights17/09/17 11:10 PM
2

Nutter.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 10:58 PM
3

Always be recording.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 10:56 PM
1

Thank you. We support women too! But you're right, there are a lot of things that need to be fixed for men at the moment, that are generally ignored.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 12:48 PM
3

Sound reasonable. On the other hand, why should any man be forced to pay someone else to do what he would much rather be doing himself (taking care of his own child, in his own home)? I believe that any man who is willing and reasonably competent to take his own child into his own home and care for his child himself, should never be forced to pay support to anyone. You can't reasonably argue that a woman should first be entitled to sue a man in court to take his child away from him, then afterwa…
/r/MensRights17/09/17 12:44 PM
5

You mean the "We Hate Men (Misandry)" project?
/r/MensRights17/09/17 12:39 PM
2

What's so great about sex? Rubbing smelly bits together. Yuck. If she thinks that marketing sex is going to get her very far in life, think again. Nor should it, really. She could use a real attitude adjustment.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 04:36 AM
1

No, men are not better than women. But they certainly are treated worse in the country where I live.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 04:34 AM
3

Similarly to feminazis there's a bias across the board in various ways and angles. Complain about it when MRAs actually have institutional power to lord it over women with their opinions. For now, I'm working with the underdogs. And I don't actually see much in the way of MRAs advocating discrimination against women here. In fact, close to none. I wish the same could be said about feminists in their attitudes against men. Set your sexist chivalrist concerns aside. Women are no more above critici…
/r/MensRights17/09/17 04:34 AM
1

Yup! But but but female good, man bad, they lament.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 04:29 AM
1

Thank you so much for doing this! I'm still married and taking care of my children every day.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:44 AM
3

Good god. What a bunch of entitled twits.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:26 AM
2

You need an employment lawyer. Things will vary so much depending on circumstance, the state you live in, and even the county or city. Be sure to come back here and let us know what you learned about California from your lawyer.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:25 AM
1

Unlike in the instance of race, males and females are not born to separate families. For example, in many African American communities, there is a problem of poverty being handed down from generation to generation as a result of familial socioeconomic status, which often persists and carries over from generation to generation. It is a problem that arises from poverty. In contrast, that is not the case for men & women. Whether or not a child is born male or female is a random act of genetics. On …
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:20 AM
1

(1) Don't buy it when a feminist tells you that feminism is the social movement that "speaks for both for women and for men" or that feminism is "the" social movement that stands for equality between the sexes. Or that if you are not a feminist, then you are opposed to equality. Nothing could be further from the truth. If that were the case, it wouldn't be called "feminism", it would be called "gender egalitarianism", or "gender equal opportunism." Reminder: feminism relentlessly advocates for g…
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:16 AM
1

Women's groups have been the most vocal in opposing shared custody legislation in every single jurisdiction where this has been proposed. And unfortunately, people listen to feminits because they wield a lot of institutional power, and because feminists can easily rely on a victimhood narrative (based on sexism) to misrepresent their case. In most states of the US, there actually is a presumption of joint legal custody of the child, unless one parent is deemed unfit. What they don't have in the …
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:15 AM
2

Criminal sentencing gaps. Unlike the wage gap between males and females, the sentencing gap persists after controlling for confounding variables (e.g. severity of crime, prior criminal record as opposed to profession, experience, work flexibility). The sentencing gap disfavoring males after controlling for confounding variable is on the order of 60%; the corresponding wage gap after controlling for all variables is less than 5%. In fact, giving the less than perfect capability of multivariate an…
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:12 AM
1

I think he would like the CDC reports you are talking about... provide some links to them.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:10 AM
3

Get a different English teacher. She's trying to teach you a bunch of doctrine that has nothing to do with English. Is this high school or college? You poor thing. Well, one way you are discriminated against as a male, is that you have to put up with an insufferable rabid feminist for an English teacher, which gets a lot in the way of your learning... uh... English. White women: the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of the planet. Still damseling about it though. Also…
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:09 AM
2

He makes many good points. Gynocentrism is never the right answer.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:02 AM
2

Relationships are built on shared activities, not on psychobabble.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 09:57 AM
1

Thx!
/r/MensRights15/09/17 09:55 AM
3

Philipp Davies speaks the truth, and speaking the truth is a full defense to any accusation that may be leveled against him.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 09:55 AM
6

Philipp Davies speaks the truth, and speaking the truth is a full defense to any accusation that may be leveled against him.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 09:53 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWr39Q9vBgo
/r/MensRights15/09/17 09:51 AM
2

Allegedly great artists were expert trolls. For example, Madonna (I said allegedly great), whose sole expertise was superimposing a lot of Catholic imagery with half naked and homosexual people -- was an expert troll. Then there was the "piss christ" and whatever other malarky. Misandry explains why masculine "trolling" is perceived as somehow worse than feminine "trolling."
/r/MensRights15/09/17 09:47 AM
8

He apparently meant to say the 50.01 percent-confidence standard is sufficient for judging all accused students, noting that preponderance is often used in investigations of cheating on exams. Yeah right -- university kicks a kid out of school when they are only 50.1% certain that she cheated. This would be the shittiest University on the face of the planet, certainly nothing to aspire to. And while I don't doubt there are those Universities where have it written on paper in some corner of a pol…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 09:06 AM
–

Joe Biden: Chivalrist neanderthal sexist chimp.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 08:59 AM
–

It's a pride thing. Set aside your pride. Q. Are you saying the predatory female is an egomaniac? A. Not at all. The predatory female rarely exhibits an ego the way males do. Her ego has given way to convenience and practicality. Moreover, she is quietly amazed at the excessiveness of the male ego. Unhampered by ego, she is quicker and more adroit than the male. It is curious how the female will sometimes berate the male about his ego when that very weakness often enables her to control him. Aga…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 08:58 AM
3

Do I have any chance here? Probably not. You got screwed in the custody thing, just like most men. The courts are highly bigoted. I would just let your son know, if he wants you to support you, he should move in with you.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 08:52 AM
–

Yuck. Why not attempted rape?
/r/MensRights15/09/17 08:49 AM
8

Anything they can do to show contempt and callousness to towards men, they will do.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 01:40 AM
0

Five hours is about 30 times longer than the average rape.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 01:40 AM
1

that too.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 01:15 AM
21

Do they have a program to combat women being damseling shitheads who complain about their entitled lot quite a bit too much?
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:13 PM
1

... or maybe there are just more job available. Good grief, what awful reporting.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:11 PM
1

... hey, on the bright side, the sex robot won't try to fill the kid's head with a lot of postmodernist bullcrap.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:08 PM
2

Good god. Are you in high school? You can't drop the course and take a different one?
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:06 PM
5

Very important work here. Well done.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 07:22 AM
2

Of course women who commit significant crimes should be sent to prison. It's sexist to say otherwise.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 07:21 AM
1

Awesome.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 07:05 AM
1

about the bias towards male victims of sexual abuse and assault last year. You mean bias against male victims?
/r/MensRights14/09/17 06:52 AM
1

As for practical change, for now DeVos is seeking public feedback on how to improve the system. One model she has mentioned — referring Title IX sexual assault complaints to "regional centers" that would coordinate their work with law enforcement — is a promising idea. This seems like another bad idea. "Regional centers" staffed by whom? Hysterical victim advocates? Unfortunately, sexual assault programs attract hysterical victim advocates like flies to sh*t, and this is likely to generate just …
/r/MensRights14/09/17 06:34 AM
1

Oh, nice! Thx!
/r/MensRights14/09/17 06:25 AM
1

"This seems plausible when one considers cases in which young men are selectively punished for drunk sex even though both parties are equally intoxicated and equally active in the encounter." "This is patently obvious when one considers cases in which young men are selectively punished for drunk sex even though both parties are equally intoxicated and equally active in the encounter." FTFY
/r/MensRights14/09/17 06:24 AM
2

That guy needs to get a paternity test. Basically at the party, a woman named Emma started talking to him, drugged his drink, and took advantage of him. My husband found out the day after because a friend told him he found him unconscious and saw earlier Emma on top of him on the bed but didn't realize it was him until later. Manuel didn't report her because he didn't want to "ruin her life" and so the law never got involved. It's a little unclear to me whether the OP is precisely describing a r…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 06:04 AM
3

Why is this here?
/r/MensRights14/09/17 06:02 AM
3

The boyfriend's mom is antiquated, not particularly smart, and probably something of a female chauvinist sow. "Nothing can be a woman's fault, so that leaves men." Most definitely, in case there are two people having sex and neither want a child, both should be using their own birth control. In any case, the male should 100% of the time, no exceptions, since in case the woman falls pregnant (either intentionally or otherwise), he no longer has a choice in the matter. So, no exceptions. In theory…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 05:57 AM
24

(1) Self defense is a human right, not a female right. (2) Women aren't special. (3) Chivalry is dead. As it should be.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 05:48 AM
1

Can't be worse than having a gay parent.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 05:47 AM
10

The coalition of female chauvinist sows.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 05:46 AM
1

How old are these people?
/r/MensRights14/09/17 05:45 AM
1

Do it!
/r/MensRights14/09/17 02:17 AM
3

Mary Mitchell O’Connor is a female chauvinist sow. They need to have a strident, unapologetic department of men's studies at each and every University in Ireland.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 02:03 AM
3

What is that?
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:54 AM
1

What were the results of the study? Looks like it's walled of..
/r/MensRights13/09/17 10:49 PM
1

Oh shut up you idiot.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 10:47 PM
1

Appearances are irrelevant. As you know, there are a great many Hispanics who might be the father.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 01:15 PM
1

Self fulfilling bigotry.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 07:15 AM
1

For some reason I pictured us salvaging the relationship for our daughter. Nope big mistake. She sounds combative. I would not be around her. I found out about a week after my last weekend over she decided to go out to dinner with some guy who’s been texting her for a while. He recently moved back to the area and is trying to date her. I guess where I have a problem with this and I ask for guidance is, I feel like despite everything that happened, I still love her and imaged salvaging the relati…
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:13 AM
1

Did you get a paternity test? Seems like the A#1 priority at this point in your story.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:09 AM
2

Sounds like a shit school. I hope they ho bankrupt.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:07 AM
1

They should invite Mike Nifong. He seems like the right kind of guy.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:06 AM
2

Thx, this is great.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 05:27 PM
19

Boo hoo, I'm a female. "Let's parse this data about 100 different ways, selectively complain about the things that make things seem worse for us, and ignore women's overall advantages. Because we like crying." So, women are about 60% of college students, and have close to 60% of the loans. More troubles paying for it, because females get degrees in things like "women's studies", and make-up is too expensive. Boo hoo.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 01:38 PM
1

This therapist might have the misguided impression, that her opinion on his penis as a female ought to have some bearing on how he feels about it. Which is probably not the case.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 01:37 PM
2

Just be sympathetic, but treat them like you don't really know. What's wrong with being honest about it?
/r/MensRights12/09/17 01:20 PM
3

NY as an example: Joint (Physical) Custody: This type of custody, which comes in both the forms of legal and physical custody, focuses more on the tasks and responsibilities of each parent as a separate person instead of both parents together as a couple [usual bullshitter's definition, see below] ... Most joint custody arrangements involve an alternating schedule between each parent. However, one parent may have a much greater amount of physical custody time than the other parent. Also, one par…
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:44 AM
3

Unfortunately, state courts almost universally hide family law judgements and proceedings from public scrutiny, so the courts are basically run as secret courts and are unchecked ("women's privacy"). States also frequently prevent researchers from delving through court records to perform studies and uncover biases, but suffice it to say, that the biases are very evident and obvious to nearly all parties in all Western countries. In uncommon circumstances, courts have given researchers limited ac…
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:40 AM
4

Some stuff on Scandinavian countries: Here is an analysis from 2014 or thereabouts: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/11106.pdf 4.7 Joint custody legislation ..Legal reforms in recent decades have increasingly centred on co-parenting ideals, and joint legal custody has become the norm in divorce or separation in all of the Nordic countries (Eydal and Kröger, 2010). This arrangement is also preferred in the legislation and is believed to be the best option for the child (Friðriksdóttir, forthcom…
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:33 AM
6

Let's hear it for those powerful women...
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:27 AM
4

In the democratic primary, Hillary Clinton was treated like fucking royalty -- like she was a delicate fucking princess with a genealogical heir to the presidency and like no democratic challenger should dare perturb the queen. Then Clinton hit the general campaign trail and actually found out what it's like to be called out for her ethical failures and for her shortcomings as a candidate. It was like a motorcycle just hit a brick wall. -- PPS, don't talk to me about Clinton's "stellar qualifica…
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:25 AM
1

True. In accusations to police 2-40% are able to be identified as false either through evidence of by admission. About 25% of accusations result in conviction which is hopefully secure. And between there is a whole lot of garbage that nobody knows what it is. And those are just the cases reported to police. The cases reported by college students to Orwellian campus administrators... nobody has a fucking clue.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:21 AM
1

Nice article. Credulous administrators all to often assume that false reporting rates to police who have powers of discovery and can charge false accusers, are the same as false reporting rates to sympathetic college administrators who oversee kangaroo proceedings between teenagers and early adults who may simply seek vengeance by having someone they believe should not be in school, kicked out, for reasons either real or imagined. The same university administrators who oversee kangaroo proceedin…
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:19 AM
2

Another day, another damseling shithead.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 11:20 PM
1

What legal and social changes have Men's Rights Activists made? If there weren't any, that would make it all the more important to support and join the MRM movement.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 11:15 PM
1

The original article: https://archive.fo/OKzXH Why would any male want to have sex with a feminist? Shhesh, have some standards.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 11:09 PM
2

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 11:05 PM
1

Get a lawyer and sue her for defamation. Enough is enough.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 08:03 PM
1

feminist Dump her and stop answering your phone.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 08:02 PM
2

I doubt the sex was much good in the first place. It rarely ever is as good as one might imagine, and particularly not in a circumstance such as this. I'll guess that, more likely than not, she was a heffer with an ugly personality and not very intelligent. Not that it matters. Did she ask him to get pregnant with his child by the way? If no, then, it's established that she's disgusting.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 07:51 PM
2

I can see attempting to help him feel better about it, but dismissing it as "not a concern" in a single visit is complete crap.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 07:49 PM
0

Oh, get a grip already about the prostate biopsies. It's a very minor procedure. The prostate biopsy needle is only about 1 mm in diameter. Local anesthesia is routine (akin to getting your mouth numbed), and some patients actually refuse it. It's all done in about an hour -- actually less inconvenient than one of the great many trips a man makes to the dentist over the course of his life. And remember, these aren't little cavities people are trying to fill in. It's uh... cancer. Nobody is "goin…
/r/MensRights11/09/17 04:08 PM
1

What a cunt. I agree, report her to her boss.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 04:14 AM
0

LOL another wrongbot is also dumb, can't ascertain context. I'll just leave my mistake up there as is, and leave real humans to figure out what the actual mistake / typo was.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 04:10 AM
0

LOL wrongbot is dumb, can't ascertain context. I'll just leave my mistake up there as is, and leave real humans to figure out what the actual mistake / typo was.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 04:09 AM
1

Prostate biopsies are safe, minor procedures that should of little concern, except as thy are helpful to diagnose a cancer that may kill you. Your shithead government administrator may get pissed because it means someone might end up spending money on someone who doesn't have a vagina. But the patent himself should welcome a prostate biopsies as a means to diagnose something that could well kill him if left unmonitored and untreated.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 03:55 AM
1

Looks like a July 2017 Thesis from Seoul National University (서울대학교) . 대학원 - "Graduate"
/r/MensRights11/09/17 02:11 AM
3

Awesome! What does it say?
/r/MensRights11/09/17 01:29 AM
1

Not everyone is a horny slob.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 01:15 AM
3

Gender swapping tends to answers these kinds of questions, and I'm pretty sure if an able-bodied man of sound mind did this to a brain-damaged woman, people would certainly consider him to be a predator and would not be accepting of the situation and he would probably be facing charges True. He should be entitled to sue her and win a large settlement.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 01:14 AM
1

Nothing wrong with anger.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:22 PM
4

PSA testing most certainly does decrease prostate cancer mortality rates: https://prostatecancernewstoday.com/2017/09/07/psa-screening-lowers-prostate-cancer-mortality-review-concludes/ .. and the USPTF knew this or should have known this, yet they recommended against it anyway. Men had two decades of steady progress in reducing prostate cancer death rates, beginning in the late 80's and early 90's with the widespread adoption of prostate cancer screening: http://www.onclive.com/_media/_upload_i…
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:18 PM
1

Sad.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:11 PM
2

Yea! More like this please.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 12:34 PM
1

Self defense is a human right, not a female right.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 05:40 AM
3

In social science surveys, particularly those involving hypothetical scenarios, respondents often misrepresent what they would do in real-life. This fact is well known to the social sciences, and yet there is little that social scientists typically do to do validate their results, or to communicate in their publications or to the public the limitations in their methodologies, and thus, the limitations of their conclusions. Here is what famed scientist Richard P. Feynman has to say about the ethi…
/r/MensRights10/09/17 05:17 AM
1

They did it a long time ago. Sad.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 05:10 AM
4

A lot of female ethical misconduct stems from willful (or even pretend) ignorance, or out of damseling shitheadery. Also, it's completely laughable pretense for any HONEST and ETHICAL investigator to try to root out ethical behaviors from studies based on surveys where LYING to the investigator is as easy as writing a "check" in a different box with a #2 pencil. Seriously, if a study participant is truly unethical, why would an investigator expect to find out about it in a survey? Are those who …
/r/MensRights10/09/17 04:21 AM
6

You're a very good woman.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 04:10 AM
1

Use archive.is for this POS mgazine. https://archive.fo/1on81
/r/MensRights10/09/17 04:04 AM
3

Hare hare liberal arts pseudointellectual bullcrap. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWr39Q9vBgo I let my Scientific American subscription lapse a long time ago. Prior to the early 90's, Scientific American was an outstanding journal, but in recent decades has been over-run by pseudoscientific "science journalism" types who conflate "flattering to editorial ideological preconceptions" for good / interesting science. I believe the decline started in the 90's, not long after the magazine was sold t…
/r/MensRights10/09/17 03:46 AM
2

No. There was a group of highly respected Harvard law professors who believed the "Dear Colleague" letter did not conform to federal standards and should have been challenged... but Harvard appears to have refused to allow them to challenge. Multiple Harvard Law Professors (including Alan Deshowitz) wrote and informed the educational community on this fact at the time the requirements began to be implemented: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/law-profs-slam-education-dept-for-end-run-on-campus-s…
/r/MensRights10/09/17 03:26 AM
5

Sure, ladies. I'll cry more. Just so long as: (1) I get decide what is natural for me to cry about, not you. (2). You're required to actually do something to rectify the situation. .. now about that massive sentencing gap .
/r/MensRights10/09/17 12:08 AM
1

Yes, I'd be interested to see this as well..
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:34 AM
2

That's actually a good point. Ask yourself, when was the last time a woman was slut-shamed for being a lesbian who sleeps around with too many women?
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:32 AM
20

What the title says: "Mother, child found in Minn. home with suicide note lamenting custody dispute" What the title should have said: "Mother kills child, self in murder-suicide." The title leaves out the most important fact of all: the woman committed a homicide against a 5-year old child. The way the title is written, it's like they might have been "found" playing legos. Sexist pig editors -- shame on you.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:16 AM
2

She's a sexist.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:10 AM
4

Yet "toxic masculinity." Clementine Ford shames men all the time. It's a constant thing with her. What society needs to do, is shame aggressive man-hating whiners like Clementine Ford.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:08 AM
1

That would be a case to talk about.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:04 AM
1

You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:03 AM
1

LOL read my post history. I just know sexual assault when I see it. Look, there are plenty of cases you could pick from, where innocent men have been railroaded the our shithole matriarchal culture into a false prison sentence. Brock Turner isn't one of those cases. Choose more wisely.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 05:42 AM
3

Come back here and let us know how this works out. You need to create a 'safe space' for men to gather and talk about their concerns and wishes without fear of being shouted down by feminists or non-feminists who feel threatened by a space where the traditional "ladies first" mentality is challenged. You will also want to seek equality in selective service registration, to which all school-aged men must be subjected fear loss of educational opportunities and student loans. Unfortunately, there a…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 05:21 AM
1

What, did you think I was female?
/r/MensRights08/09/17 05:18 AM
2

No, a rapist does not deserve to be executed... only imprisoned.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 03:28 AM
3

Another day, another damseling shithead. Let's unpack her column: She says: False rape allegations are a serious crime. But the way offenders are dealt with reflects a legal process in which men are the norm and women the deviants. Yes, women are treated as "special snowflakes" by the judicial system, particularly in the UK, and this is entirely sexist, discriminatory, and wrong. As it is, males are already sentenced to custodial sentences that are 60% longer than corresponding sentences for fem…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 03:17 AM
2

Would you strenuously object to the execution of a serial rapist? Yes, I would strenuously object to the execution of a serial rapist who did not kill anyone. So far as I am aware, there is no jurisdiction in the United States, or in any civilized country, that executes prisoners for the crime of rape alone. For murder-rape, yes. Such places exist. But it is an incontrovertible fact, that under no circumstance is it appropriate in a civilized country to execute someone for the crime of rape alon…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 02:35 AM
3

Even a woman like this, who deserves to be executed. No, she doesn't. She deserved to be jailed for 10 years. Don't feed the damseling shitheads with dumb, useless rhetoric. It pretty much undoes the your entire post, and then some. Delete the reference. Yes, one of her victims spent two years years in prison. That would be about 1,050,000 minutes that this poor innocent was caged involuntarily by her. In contrast, the average rape lasts how long? 10 minutes? So sure, ten years is appropriate se…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 02:22 AM
12

Courts are disgusting entities.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 02:16 AM
1

No they don't.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 10:30 AM
5

Fact-free reporting from from the identitypolitikthink bureau of the MSM. The article is all about who you are and where you are coming from. Really, totally, completely devoid of relevant objective truth. Which tells you a lot about where they are coming from.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 04:24 AM
6

https://archive.fo/p1pHz
/r/MensRights07/09/17 04:19 AM
1

... but sure legalize that too.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 04:18 AM
-1

Cite studies.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 04:17 AM
1

Yup.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 03:36 AM
5

I would have dropped the class, walked out, filed a complaint, and encouraged my classmates to do the same. Having a master's degree in English is a fucking joke by the way. If she didn't want to be regarded as a child, she should have chosen a real major.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 03:29 AM
10

I would talk to a lawyer and inquire about suing as well.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 03:24 AM
14

Her word taken over mine "to be safe." The irony here is just palpable. I asked her to meet so we can discuss this (on Facebook). Mistake. Unless you were planning to be on your computer with your lawyer sitting right next to you. Unfortunately, these things happen more often that people care to admit. Men beware, if legal in your state, always be recording.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 03:23 AM
2

Studies show, most slut shaming is by females. Not that I care.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 03:19 AM
2

I'm perfectly content with my life, thank you.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 03:11 AM
1

A woman wants to be "sexually equal" to any man? Okay then, I'll call her a "perverted swine." There's your equality for you. You have the personal freedom to act like a lecherous slob. Everyone else has the personal freedom to talk about it as much as they desire.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 03:02 AM
1

Legalize male sex steroids ("anabolic steroids"). It makes infinite more sense than legalizing pot, one of the most enfeebling drugs on the face of the planet. Meanwhile, indications for women taking estrogens may include "vagina too dry", "pimple", "latex allergy", "this number too low", "hair on my lip", "oily skin", "normal menstruation", "losing hair", "irritable mood", "being old", "warm sweaty feelings"...
/r/MensRights07/09/17 02:56 AM
0

Yeah, nowadays, I pretty much assume that, when Ben Shapiro is talking, I'm about to be told something that is profoundly ignorant. Not sure what all the hype was with this guy. MRAs should pretty much have written him off. I think he's had more than enough chances to get something right by now. Virag Dhulia painted a perfect portrait of Ben Shapiro almost ten years ago today: "A man, who protects a woman, not only develops a feeling of greatness, but is also hailed by peers and superiors equall…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 02:24 AM
1

"Men are pigs." There is no "slut paradox" that weighs against females. Males who sleep around are culturally though of as being pigs. So are females. The only difference is, males are generally assumed to be pigs at baseline, even with no direct knowledge about their sexual behaviors. Most males who sleep around probably realize that they will be assumed to be pigs no matter what -- so what difference does it make? Whether men sleep around or not, they're still considered pigs. Sometimes people…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 02:15 AM
4

You can't "remove" Title IX without repealing the law by congressional action. Devos has no authority to "remove" Title IX. "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance..."
/r/MensRights07/09/17 02:00 AM
1

She ought to defund universities that maintain a women's studies department but maintain no corresponding assertive, activist men's studies / men's rights department. Exactly the same way they've handled sports teams.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 01:56 AM
0

They don't care if you get laid. Seriously, they just don't give a shit.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 01:24 AM
13

https://archive.fo/uFJa8 What a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 01:21 AM
7

PPS, don't talk to me about Clinton's "stellar qualifications" either. The Secretary of State is the equivalent of a toilet plunger so far as running for President is concerned -- neck deep in shit from corrupt foreign governments, zillions of opportunities to be roped into scandals or stained by foreign influence. Neck deep in negotiations with some of the most tyrannical, corrupt and ethically challenged regimes the world over. If something is totally corrupt and shit stained that a President …
/r/MensRights06/09/17 05:30 AM
1

I love 'em. All the time.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 04:59 AM
6

It's the regressive left still haunting ordinary citizen voters. When it comes to politics, zero logic; all identity politics and fake smiles.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 04:55 AM
3

Dumbest. Comment. Here. In. A. Long. Time.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 04:51 AM
1

And if by "dirty pool", you mean a game of pool where one player was mediocre and supremely over-confident, whereas the other player was deceptively a shark, then you may actually have struck on a correct analogy. But note, in pool, that's not even cheating. How does one cheat in pool anyway? I'm not sure. Irrelevant quote: "Calling 'dirty pool' in an actual pool game is a little like gasping 'you lied!' indignantly at the poker table." - unknown person
/r/MensRights06/09/17 04:38 AM
3

But that was dirty pool, MagicTampon. Dirty. Pool. I don't think it was dirty pool. She was a dirty candidate. A dirty candidate who miraculously made it through a primary essentially unchallenged. Ask yourself how that happens. If anything, Bernie Sanders and the other democratic candidates should be criticized for being too soft on Clinton -- for essentially ceding the nomination to her in the first place. Surely, no male candidate has ever been treated as unfairly. Many have been, many have b…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 04:17 AM
17

Bernie Sanders treated Clinton like fucking royalty -- like she was a delicate fucking princess with a genealogical heir to the presidency and like he shouldn't dare perturb the queen. Then Clinton hit the general campaign trail and actually found out what it's like to be called out for her ethical failures and for her shortcomings as a candidate. It was like a motorcycle just hit a brick wall.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 03:56 AM
1

He did not know she was passed out, he was also very drunk. But some how he is expected to meet the standards of a reasonable person. Yes, he is expected to meet the standards of a reasonable person. Generally speaking, being SELF intoxicated is not an excuse for committing a crime. Occasionally, it may be a mitigating factor in sentencing, but then it again it may be completely ignored for the purposes of sentencing. Passing out does not actually remove that consent. Yes, it does. By law, it do…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 03:30 AM
9

No more inarticulate than your stupid question. Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 03:07 AM
1

I don't agree. You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 03:03 AM
0

He hasn't seen the movie, or the script, and he thinks it's ridiculous. What a dumbass.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 03:01 AM
1

Sad. So sorry that you lost your dad because of your mother.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 03:00 AM
2

Yet a large number of damseling shithead females will complain that they can't get dates because they believe men have unreasonable expectations... so-called "impossible standards" for females and whatever garbage. ...unbelievable.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 02:18 AM
2

You're dumb.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 02:08 AM
1

There is no proof she didn't give consent either. How can she know she did not give consent, she says she was to drunk to remember. But some how she knows she did not consent to something but can't remember. You're seriously suggesting she told him, "Please finger me after I've passed out unconscious?" Because barring that, once someone falls unconscious, it doesn't matter whether or not there was consent before the onset of unconsciousness.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 01:22 AM
0

Again, if you can't be honest in the discussion what's the point? You said, "Brock Turner's BAC was .171%. " Then you offered a link to a Notre Dame web page with a table that contains the two following entries: 0.160-0.199% Dysphoria predominates, nausea may appear. The drinker has the appearance of a sloppy drunk. 0.200-0.249% Needs assistance in walking; total mental confusion. Dysphoria with nausea and vomiting; possible blackout. .. but in your post you DID NOT quote the text for the releva…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 09:19 PM
0

Again, if you can't be honest in the discussion what's the point? You said, "Brock Turner's BAC was .171%. " Then you offered a link to a Notre Dame web page with a table that contains the two following entries: 0.160-0.199% Dysphoria predominates, nausea may appear. The drinker has the appearance of a sloppy drunk. 0.200-0.249% Needs assistance in walking; total mental confusion. Dysphoria with nausea and vomiting; possible blackout. .. but in your post you DID NOT quote the text for the releva…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 09:18 PM
0

Again, if you can't be honest in the discussion what's the point? You said, "Brock Turner's BAC was .171%. " Then you offered a link to a Notre Dame web page with a table that contains the two following entries: 0.160-0.199% Dysphoria predominates, nausea may appear. The drinker has the appearance of a sloppy drunk. 0.200-0.249% Needs assistance in walking; total mental confusion. Dysphoria with nausea and vomiting; possible blackout. .. but in your post you DID NOT quote the text for the releva…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 09:18 PM
1

And your background and expertise that qualifies you to cherry-pick and substitute text from a table on the medical effects of alcohol... is what exactly? Why invoke the "authority" and alleged expertise of "Notre Dame" if you're just going to superimpose your own uninformed take on the information presented as you like anyway?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 09:18 PM
1

Again, if you can't be honest in the discussion what's the point? You said, "Brock Turner's BAC was .171%. " Then you offered a link to a Notre Dame web page with a table that contains the two following entries: 0.160-0.199% Dysphoria predominates, nausea may appear. The drinker has the appearance of a sloppy drunk. 0.200-0.249% Needs assistance in walking; total mental confusion. Dysphoria with nausea and vomiting; possible blackout. .. but in your post you DID NOT quote the text for the releva…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 09:11 PM
1

I haven't seen any indication that anyone who is writing about this movie in the press, has actually seen the script.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:24 PM
1

In other words, the table you posted is not helpful for determining whether or not Turner was incapacitated. Despite your urgent attempts to "prove" what you no way of knowing. I'm inclined to think, that if you are capable of finger-fucking an unconscious girl and then running away when you are caught, you are not incapacitated.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:19 PM
1

In other words, the table you posted is not helpful for determining whether or not Turner was incapacitated. Despite your urgent attempts to "prove" what you no way of knowing. I'm inclined to think, that if you are capable of finger-fucking an unconscious girl and then running away when you are caught, you are not incapacitated.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:19 PM
1

In other words, the table you posted is not helpful for determining whether or not Turner was incapacitated. I'm inclined to think, that if you are capable of finger-fucking an unconscious girl and then running away when you are caught, you are not incapacitated.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:18 PM
2

You've got lawyers arguing that you shouldn't teach rape law to law students because it could be traumatic. Mostly it's the students who are complaining that they are "triggered." Some lawyers, but mostly the students.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:23 PM
5

I'd rather a lawyer teach kids what the legal definition of sexual consent is, so long as the lawyer is objective about what the law says. It's much better than having a lying SJW twat or pandering chivalrist shithead present "their version".
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:21 PM
2

https://archive.fo/tHQAW
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:19 PM
1

... can be. ... but may also be completely ignored. ... or, in some jurisdictions (not common), being drunk may actually be considered an aggravating factor.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:19 PM
3

Titlegore for pandering feminist readers.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:17 PM
1

LOL "almost" in a state of total mental confusion. Based on a table on a website, with referencing the entry in the table not relevant to the BAC that was actually measured, but one above it. ... right....
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:15 PM
0

LOL "almost" in a state of total mental confusion. Based on a table on a website, with referencing the entry in the table not relevant to the BAC that was actually measured, but one above it. ... right....
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:15 PM
1

Disingenuous. that's just short of total mental confusion He was almost confused? Almost? That's your argument? Why did you list "total mental confusion", which is a standard that doesn't even apply to the BAC you gave (0.171%), but rather to the description of the next level higher in the table you linked? That's disingenuous. From your table: 0.160-0.199% Dysphoria predominates, nausea may appear. The drinker has the appearance of a sloppy drunk. "Sloppy drunk" ≠ incapacitation. Not that the B…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:58 PM
1

What did she do? Kiss him? I see no evidence or testimony that she touched his cock or put her hands on his crotch. I see no evidence or testimony that she grabbed his hand, spread her legs and put it in her pants. Plus, I see no evidence that proves that he was intoxicated enough to meet legal standards of incapacitation, proved beyond a reasonable doubt... You keep repeating the same shit over and over, yet when asked, you provide no detailed explanation of what it is that you allege she did. …
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:51 PM
1

I'm not holding judgement on this movie until it's released. The likelihood that Hollywood will infuse it with some garbage man bad woman good horseshit is just too high to say anything. Ridiculous the hissing opprobrium emanating from the pro-female contingency at the mere possibility of honest study of the female psyche being made into a film.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:25 PM
1

Possibly he was incapacitated then. Not sure why that matters at all. There is no evidence that Brock Turner was sexually assaulted on that night. Meanwhile, there are two witnesses who saw him fingering an unconscious woman on the ground. I suppose, if there were any proof that she assaulted him prior to passing out, a decent and equitable prosecutor would have charged them both. But that wasn't the case. So it's not relevant. May be relevant in other cases, but not in this one.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:22 PM
1

Yeah, I think drunk people are disgusting idiots.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:19 PM
1

For a given individual yes. But individuals many times apparently are not able to understand the difference between reality and what goes on in their head -- or just outright lie or exaggerate about it. The many articles posted to this group belie that fact. So yes, I do think the overall statistic is disturbing.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:18 PM
2

You are correct; my error (fixed in my post). The Brock Turner case was in California, where digital penetration can be considered felony sexual assault but not rape. Be aware, that in other states (probably most states), digital penetration can be considered rape.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:15 PM
1

Is it a crime, if she blacks out some time AFTER he starts fingering her? First of all, a black out is not a loss of consciousness. A black out is a loss of memory that occurs while the intoxicated person is still conscious. If you are asking, is it a crime if she falls unconscious after he starts fingering her. Then the answer is yes. If a reasonable person would have known that she was unconscious / incapacitated and ceased where he did not, then legally it is considered a form of sexual batte…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:08 PM
1

I see no evidence of that.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 05:29 AM
1

I know, no kidding.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 05:04 AM
1

She loved it, she said herself. She regrets it because she feels like a slut. My thoughts on the so-called "slut paradox": There is no "slut paradox" that weighs against females. Males who sleep around are culturally though of as being pigs. So are females. The only difference is, males are generally assumed to be pigs at baseline, even with no direct knowledge about their sexual behaviors. Most males who sleep around probably realize that they will be assumed to be pigs no matter what -- so wha…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 05:00 AM
1

She raped Brock according to no metrics. FOR THE UMPTEENTH TIME THERE WAS NO SEXUAL INTERCOURSE SO THEREFORE NO RAPE ACCORDING TO CALIFORNIA LAW It is so completely clear that you are a completely uninformed moron. Move on.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:58 AM
1

Shut up already. This isn't what you learned from your shithead teachers in sex ed class. There is a specific legal definition for the term "incapacitated" and Turner didn't meet it. And at any rate, it's irrelevant, because there are two witnesses who have testified that she was unconscious, as well as several officers who can state she was out cold when they arrived. Reports are that she was even snoring. So can you shut up already?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:55 AM
1

Turner had both rape charges dismissed because, AS I ALREADY TOLD YOU SEVERAL TIMES, digital penetration cannot be considered rape in the state of California. How many time do I have to say this?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:49 AM
1

What evidence is there proving that there was any sexual activity prior to her passing out that would be suitable for charging her for sexual assault? There is no such evidence. So shut up already.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:46 AM
1

Pretty sure witnesses reported that Brock was drunk as hell. Drunk as hell ≠ incapacitated. That doesn't matter. Brock was too drunk to be able to give consent. That makes the girl a rapist. Why wasn't she charged? Absolutely it does matter. You can't get yourself wasted & naked, then rub yourself up against a sleeping or unconscious person, then claim you were rape. Are you retarded? Just go away. You're not helpful.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:37 AM
6

He was convicted of rape. Not exactly. He was convicted of felony sexual assault. In California, fingering a person can be felony sexual assault, but not rape.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:33 AM
1

Anyone who pretends that a nearly black-out drunk man should be somehow, magically, capable of intuiting the intentions of a now passed out woman who had previously been profoundly sexual with him is a lying sack of shit. Talk about your white-knighting double standards. It's not anyone's responsibility to "intuit" any intentions of an unconscious person. A reasonable, sober person would have known she was unconscious, and would have known it was rape to finger her while unconscious. Turner is h…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:28 AM
1

Edit: in fact shouldn't the girl have also been brought up on rape charges, since she engaged in sexual activity with Brock while he was drunk? I have heard no evidence to suggest that was the case. How does an unconscious person engage in sexual activity with anyone? Are you dumb?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:24 AM
1

He would have had to have been considered legally incapacitated for that to be the case. Not sure if there was enough evidence to support that he was incapacitated. Witnesses say he had enough wits about him to try to run away when he was confronted.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:14 AM
12

Does it do USB audio recordings? Always be recording.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:09 AM
1

Did I miss anything? Well... not so much. Went out with a girl... Well yes in the sense that they left a party. I don't think they knew each other prior to that night. They both consented to sex So far as I know, there was no allegation that they consented to sexual intercourse. Turner alleged that there was consent to some sexual activity short of sex after she fell behind the wooden shed. The woman claims she remembers nothing. There were no other witnesses to those moments. Two Swedish grad s…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:55 AM
10

I hope you never forget this and spend your entire life seeking revenge on the matriarchal system that railroaded you. Never let your anger go. Cultivate it and use it against the system.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:19 AM
1

So his current girlfriend said she "regretted it? Oh good god. That sounds frankly asinine.' Hopefully, there are no default legal considerations for either of you because you were only a year apart. Would depend on what state you live in. You know, it would benefit a lot of young en if sex ed were to speak a lot about these issues of false accusations and so forth. Just another reason why younger people shouldn't be having sex. At all. Too many head cases and young people who have their heads f…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:13 AM
1

Oh gotcha. The carrier probably wouldn't.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:07 AM
4

Correct you are.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:07 AM
1

You should still be able get a copy of the police report. I would speak to your father for sure. It's a bit unfathomable to me how any parent would have let their child speak to police without having hired a lawyer to be present and involved in the case.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:05 AM
1

I would say your quoted statement does not exclude the possibility that data may yet be recoverable. For example, if the device was backed up to another device -- such as a laptop or desktop computer, then the image of the entire phone may still exist in encrypted form on the laptop or desktop. Apple may not be able to recover it, but if you still had the phone, or the passwords / keychain from the phone, then the messages may still be recoverable. Likewise, if the device was backed up to icloud…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 01:44 AM
1

Yup.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 01:39 AM
1

They think they can get away with it because chivalry.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 01:39 AM
1

I thought you no longer have the texts...
/r/MensRights05/09/17 01:26 AM
1

Find out his name, call the "SVU," and call his supervisor and report him. I guess he didn't think you were "special." What an asshole.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 12:26 AM
1

Fuck this bullcrap. Let's just establish the day before, the third Saturday of June as "biological father's day." Tradition should be to give your biological father a free DNA test establishing his parenthood, or a copy of the results in the form of a card. Fuck those SJW assholes.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 12:09 AM
6

If the cop has done even a halfway reasonable job, he would have documented and sworn to the exact content of the texts. If he didn't, sue him as well.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 12:06 AM
1

Don't make assumptions that it can't be recovered through iMessage. Don't assume anything.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 12:05 AM
1

A civil lawsuit for slander is different than a criminal charge. Are you telling me that you did not preserve the texts or see a lawyer to have them preserved? The texts may still be on the old phone. It's really a shame, that your school administrators did not seek to direct you how to preserve the evidence. I would complain to them about that.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 12:04 AM
1

I was terrified, what if she pulled a rape card if she regretted it? Very good question to be asking.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 11:59 PM
1

Modern feminism has devolved into a a bunch of complaining in favor of special perks for having a vagina.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 11:57 PM
1

That was sarcasm, right? I get it.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 11:54 PM
2

Bullshit. It's a shame that Jemma Beale was convicted and sentenced for ten only ten years after falsely imprisoning a male for two years. She should have been sentenced the same way as someone who abducts another person, then stows them away in a locked basement for two years. The others, who knows? At the least, they should have their names published and stories made know to the public so it can be discussed fully. I doubt they didn't know that they were lying.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 07:15 PM
1

Any person who chooses to self-intoxicate, then willfully engages in sexual activity, then willfully seeks punitive action against the person with whom they participated -- is a completely deplorable, shitty person. Drunken hook-ups are not sexual assaults. A person who self-intoxicates, whether male or female, assumes the risk of their subsequent intoxicated choices and actions. Drinking is not an excuse. There are far more "legitimate" excuses someone might have - generally beyond their contro…
/r/MensRights04/09/17 06:59 PM
54

Universities should be prohibited from regulating students' personal activities, period. They have no more legitimacy regulating people in their at-home activities than your employer does.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 06:55 PM
1

Good. Chivalry must die.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 06:53 PM
1

Disturbingly, exhibitionism and rape consistently rank among the most common top sexual fantasies for women.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 06:52 PM
1

Sounds like a good summary. If she's not enough into you to pay for your meal, she's probably not enough into you as a long term partner.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 06:47 PM
1

Correct, the chances that his biological father, who is supposed to be "old man" has himself submitted his DNA to a service like 23andMe or ancestryDNA are pretty slim. I think 23andMe is said to have about 2,000,000 customers today, not all of whom are from the US. As of 2017, AncestryDna claims to have genotyped 5,000,000 individuals. Assuming these are all Americans (not sure how true that is), that's about 1.4% of the US population. So it could be as much as 2% of the US population whose DNA…
/r/MensRights04/09/17 03:15 PM
13

How are they "fantasists?" Why not just call them liars? In addition, since they and obtained money for it, shouldn't they also be called "fraudsters" and "criminals?"
/r/MensRights04/09/17 08:02 AM
1

Yeah, is this the video that started out with some scenes from a video game of someone being shot by an arrow or something? I can't even remember, and Im not going to watch that intro again.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 05:41 AM
1

God I hate youtube videos of people telling me their opinions.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 05:40 AM
1

but they are very similar No, they're not.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 05:32 AM
1

OK so why not just post the links to stuff where he talks about men's rights? Are you hoping I'm going to listen to "thousands of hours of video on youtube of him speaking/teaching in various forums/interviews" just to find stuff relevant to the MR movement? Not a chance.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 05:29 AM
1

What insult and apology? When you posted your thread, there were literally no contents, no links or other sources to indicate what you were talking about Jordan Peterson in relation to MRAs. Literally you told us all that Petersen "has thousands of hours of video on youtube of him speaking/teaching in various forums/interviews" but you provided zero links to anything he has said about the MRM. You act like Jordan Peterson is a well known person to MRM yet I have hardly heard of him in any way. I…
/r/MensRights04/09/17 05:20 AM
1

Sorry this had to happen to you. I feel even worse fir the man who you thought was your dad. Probably your best bet, is to find out more stuff from your mother. Things like, what kind of job your father had, his exact age, where he went to school, where he was born. There are some sites that list people with common names according to age and prior addresses. eg: https://www.peoplefinders.com/peoplesearch/searchresults?Criteria.search=People&Criteria.fn=jon&Criteria.mn=&Criteria.ln=snow&Criteria.…
/r/MensRights04/09/17 05:09 AM
1

No, it's precise science.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 05:00 AM
1

Ah, Virginia. But not everybody lives in Virginia, and in many states, a screwed up initial proceeding may be irrecoverable. Also, the term "de novo" may be confusing to some people, as it may mean different things in different states, or in different circumstances. In some states / circumstances (as per Wikipedia article above) questions of law (whether the court applied the law correctly) may be reviewed "de novo", whereas questions of circumstances evaluated by the court may not be. So an app…
/r/MensRights04/09/17 03:58 AM
1

Well I don't know what state you live in but n my state everyone gets to appeal. Perhaps so. But again, appeals are for correcting errors that a court made, or correcting some egregious form of misconduct (e.g. misrepresentation to the court) on the part of your counter-party. They are not for correcting your own errors that you made, particularly while representing yourself. If you screwed up your own case, chances are they are going to tell you "tough luck." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appea…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 04:29 PM
1

If they lose they can always appeal and go the lawyer route. Ignorant. Your chance of winning on appeal are much lower if you didn't use a lawyer from the start. Unless there is some major error on the part of the court (not your error, but the court's), in most cases an appeals court will refuse to even hear your appeal. In other words, if you screwed up, but not the court, your chances of getting that overturned are next to nil.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 03:12 PM
1

"Good time" = up to no good. Drunk people act like stupid idiots.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 02:55 PM
1

You can also hang your gonads over a fire and may not suffer burns, but it's not advisable. It's possible, but not very likely.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 02:44 PM
1

I found a loophole that allowed me to give up all of my rights and opt out of being involved with my daughter and her mother's lives for good. Good for you. Not sure if I remember correctly, but I think Georgia is one of the few states that have enacted reforms to help men extricate themselves from these horrible situations. In many states, you'd be on the hook for support until at least the child turns 18, and in some states until the child graduates from college. This state of affairs is entir…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 02:38 PM
1

Yes, as in I agree with most of what you said. Except what Silverman said pretty much is a homophobic comment.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 02:18 PM
1

... but without specifically mentioning MRAs? Or did he mentions specifically the case of Warren Farrell being belligerently protested on his visit to Canada? Free speech, yes. People here tend to be for free speech. But many people are in favor of free speech.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 02:17 PM
1

Drunk women are disgusting. I wouldn't hang around them. If I had a girlfriend, and she liked to go out to bars and get drunk, I would dump her.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 05:20 AM
1

The best solution is to just start a new wikipedia.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 05:17 AM
2

Chivalry is shit.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 05:16 AM
2

Of course shared custody is the best option in the majority of circumstances.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 05:15 AM
3

http://archive.is/exlcV
/r/MensRights03/09/17 05:13 AM
1

No shit who wouldn't rather to stay home with little kids rather than go to work?
/r/MensRights03/09/17 05:12 AM
1

OK. What does that have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights03/09/17 05:05 AM
1

As with most things in science and medicine, the exception, while interesting, proves the general rule.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 05:03 AM
1

Sure, the term "homophobia" is itself a misnomer, but for various reasons, in as much as the term means anything, it ought to be applied here. FYI I think the reason the word "homophobia" exists at all, is because it was invented by progressives, in order to insinuate that those who are in any way opposed to or who are repelled by homosexual acts, must in some way have homosexual tendencies -- used to slander those who are opposed to homosexuality as being gay in some way. So in a way, the term …
/r/MensRights03/09/17 04:57 AM
1

Sure it is. For all Silverman knows, the guy does suck dicks or has sucked dicks. Silverman implies that there is something wrong or insulting about it, when there isn't. She even adds a bit of gratuitous slander about ejaculation. Of course, use of "phobic" in the term "homophobic" is, as always, a misnomer. But in as much as the term is accepted to mean anything at all, it is appropriately applied here.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 04:51 AM
1

What exactly is it that he talks about that would be of interest to MRAs?
/r/MensRights03/09/17 02:46 AM
4

Taylor Swift is actually fairly talented, if you are into pop music. Which I am not. Of course, she's a feminist, which is like -10000 points. Spoiled white chicks. Bah.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 04:31 PM
1

Share custody.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 01:31 PM
1

Females in Western cultures are the primary beneficiaries of gender entitlement; hence why there is a tendency for them to bring discussions about gender into nearly everything. They want to continually remind people that they think they are special.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 01:30 PM
3

Yup. No excuse.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 01:18 PM
3

http://archive.is/doRN9
/r/MensRights02/09/17 01:05 PM
1

(gender fluid whatever, man hating allowed everywhere in the media...) They have a lot of man-hating in the media there too.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 12:56 PM
1

All of it, but particularly the part where females don't have to do jack shit.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 06:42 AM
4

"The only time anyone ever asks a guy to 'be a man' is when they are trying to convince him to do something that is not in his best interest." "Anyone" also includes feminists.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 05:11 AM
1

Make recordings of all your classes and keep them for a later time after you graduate when you can post them to the internet and mock feminists.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 05:09 AM
1

Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 05:07 AM
1

Talk to your lawyer. Se if you can recover his costs from her when you intervene in order to get her to follow the court order.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 05:02 AM
3

The matriarchal system in which we live deserves to be demolished.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 02:19 PM
2

And don't forget: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binders_full_of_women Chivalry must die.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 02:16 PM
1

Hope they have to pay up buko bucks.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 06:15 AM
2

http://archive.is/0GqG2
/r/MensRights01/09/17 06:13 AM
1

Once again proving: Feminists don't care about equality, and don't give a crap about men.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 06:11 AM
11

Not sure what this has to do with men's rights. But okay, here are some comparisons you can add to your post to make your post to make it more like a men's rights issue: "Creepy finance guy with spreadsheet of match.com 'prospects' " http://archive.li/WUWET Here is another: http://ktla.com/2016/11/03/sexist-scouting-report-ranking-female-players-looks-ends-harvard-mens-soccer-season/
/r/MensRights01/09/17 05:56 AM
2

http://archive.is/7M8fx
/r/MensRights01/09/17 05:44 AM
2

They probably dress it up in some gynocentric baloney in order to avoid the usual hissing opprobrium emanating fro the gynocentric-chivalrist axis of evil.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:59 AM
1

Secret courts are an abuse of state power. They should be abolished. There is no excuse for it.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:52 AM
1

Now FCS. ;)
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:31 PM
1

Female chauvinist sows.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 02:01 PM
2

True, but my concern here, is that when false accusers come forward of their own accord (e.g. were not caught in a lie or are not otherwise under threat of being exposed), as the daughter did, strong penalties may prevent others who have also lied from coming forward to free the falsely imprisoned. My first concern is getting those falsely accused men out of prison. Like I said though, if this was all under threat of being exposed because of some ongoing investigation or threat of investigation,…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:51 PM
4

It's the special princess syndrome. Many / most women believe that by birth, females are the designated beneficiaries of chivalry, and that their concerns are prioritized. Modern feminism unfortunately, has grown to be the most recent iteration of that sexist attitude.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:41 PM
3

... Your economics teacher is not qualified to teach young people.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 06:05 AM
2

Feminist "Men's Studies" -- Sexist pigs and female chauvinist sows promoting ladies-first chivalry and other antediluvian sexist horse crap for many years and still counting.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 05:24 AM
1

Disgusting. If the daughter approves, the mother should be sent right to prison. The daughter should be commended for coming forward after all these years to free an innocent man. One only wishes she could have done it sooner.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 05:20 AM
1

Many women actually prefer having men in leadership positions, because male leaders can be easily pressured to abide by chivalrist dogshit ladies' first management practices.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 05:18 AM
5

TRP has nothing to do with the MRN. Lying liars and the people who write lies.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 05:14 AM
1

Correct. Self-intoxication is not like other forms of incapacitaion, because it is self-induced. A self-intoxicated individual, in drinking alcohol, makes a conscious choice to self-intoxicate, and in so doing, assumes responsibility for their subsequent self-intoxicated choices and actions. Rarely, a court may grant a form of clemency to a self-intoxicated individual, by unwinding or setting aside civil contracts entered into while self-intoxicated, but in virtually no circumstance, is it consi…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 05:13 AM
1

Good luck with that!
/r/MensRights31/08/17 05:12 AM
1

Ultraviolet? No. Absolutely not. Get out.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 05:11 AM
23

Great news. Let's hope she pays up.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 05:08 AM
6

And people wonder why a US high school education rates among the worst among industrialized universities. It's the SJW contingency feeding them complete bullcrap.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 04:57 AM
6

Gross.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 02:59 PM
1

Dump that counselor, find another one. Call your insurer and ask them to hook you up with a counselor who is an MRA / men's advocate (and not a specialist in men who mostly shits on them). There is a need for it, make it known.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 02:57 PM
2

Thx for clarifying.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 02:54 PM
2

Glad to know there is no reason to bend the knee to special snowflakes.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 02:53 PM
1

Before she could continue she ended the point because she didn't want to "go down that track". We know what that means. What does that mean? She knows it's true, but she is going to completely ignore the facts anyways?
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:38 AM
8

Lessons in how a "gentleman" should treat a spoiled white chick.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:34 AM
2

Another day, another damseling shithead.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:33 AM
5

Schools these days are misandric shitholes. I don't blame them for walking out. I would have never attended.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:33 AM
1

Thank god it's dead.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:28 AM
1

Sounds like she's stringing you along. Yes, you're being a dumbass.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 11:01 PM
2

Tammy Schirle, a professor of economics at Wilfrid Laurier University... ... and female chauvinist sow.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 06:28 PM
1

"Ladies" can't be expected to use the "patriarchal construct" called "math." It's all about their "feelings."
/r/MensRights29/08/17 06:25 PM
3

We've got bigger problems to worry about.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 06:03 PM
12

"Selective" service is ladies' first sexist bullcrap.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 04:02 PM
5

Good as in it talks about a very bad attitude. I agree.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 07:02 AM
2

Michiganders, get out and write letters to your state reps! Vote out anyone who opposes this legislation.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 06:58 AM
2

Keep them in check from elsewhere. Or better yet, build your own following.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 06:57 AM
1

Good to have places that aren't going to cave the first time Angela Merkel says "please."
/r/MensRights29/08/17 06:57 AM
1

Because chivalry is shit.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 06:53 AM
2

Good gawd it doesn't surprise me. Unfortunately, many scientists are pompous jackasses who want to use their social status to politically bully ordinary people. So it doesn't surprise me, really, there are those in science, even more likely science "journalists," who dream to "popularize" and junk-ify the publication process. I occasionally receive unsolicited phone calls or emails from the science organizations I belong to, where they try to recruit members into one ridiculous political cause o…
/r/MensRights29/08/17 06:03 AM
1

I try to avoid YouTube as much as I can. So I don't know.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 05:36 PM
1

OK. You've asked a whole bunch of irrelevant questions, and you're unqualified.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 03:06 PM
1

Sorry Millenials. Call me old-fashioned, you're going to have to type in English for me to listen to what you say. I don't have tie to spend listening to you crawl through an argument in a video at snail's pace.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:35 PM
1

In other words, you're saying you're unqualified.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:27 PM
11

Pamela Purse yelled, “Ladies first,” Pushing in front of the ice cream line. Pamela Purse yelled, “Ladies first,” Grabbing the ketchup at dinnertime. Climbing on the morning bus She’d shove right by all of us And there’d be a tiff or a fight or a fuss When Pamela Purse yelled, “Ladies first.”... "Ladies First” by Shel Silverstein
/r/MensRights28/08/17 05:14 AM
1

Not the norm, but not uncommon for fathers.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 05:13 AM
1

What is this supposed to be, therapy?
/r/MensRights28/08/17 12:41 AM
1

Kicke her out.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 12:41 AM
5

Peter Pan syndrome, or correct diagnosis? Therein lies the rub. Not a big fan of getting kids involved.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 12:38 AM
13

The law is the law. If they don't lie it, change the law. Then they can have men-only gun ranges / nights and women-only gun ranges / nights.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 12:37 AM
1

(T4Pd2:fxb&kdELn4#pDb9UF-R;7h5b+
/r/MensRights28/08/17 12:36 AM
3

m2OWH%X&ShXZ&Bx!XeBkOxOEPd3G%53q&eAJaeO,&A.-,Di~AwrumA6nh0)Iu9!1Tn
/r/MensRights27/08/17 03:40 PM
5

UNXP)hHRA7D>6GRI%;Obizg
/r/MensRights27/08/17 02:51 PM
3

Fantastic way to handle the situation. Kudos to you.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 02:49 PM
10

*uB<@-ek<1GTlDoW5~Zi8vWD96 08%23ps5u0ism]kS;<
/r/MensRights27/08/17 02:44 PM
2

Sounds like, in exceptional case, someone with a vagina is being treated like people with penises are treated every day. Tragic if true.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 02:43 PM
2

:) Thanks. At least I know someone read it.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 08:25 AM
6

I'm not into watching videos. It's an inefficient use of time, as well as bandwidth. Write it out. What is this?
/r/MensRights27/08/17 08:22 AM
1

You're clearly no imbecile, I guess you're debunked then.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:41 AM
4

H@l:~r6WzwfI)I+obNtdQ3mUk6&OS0q@d]myMT.qBri>O3-3Q$d.IK]-zAEDpWNOGVx3be.5mL@Xcd<AK*^rdk>!FiOmHWhx31bD1w>!@K@F@qFLCk&tE&Eue&#4[JVB9b7!e+) VI2Ca*L1@duq[R!51;JXIc&@243-T&u#k<Py$CTQ;C:0k#pMgr;W<HWhC qRL&TA3RAa
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:40 AM
3

Fantastic job Mike. Here's the run-down. Mike says, "Between the ages of 21 and 39, women on average" earn more than men. Feminist response: women do better in school and get more degrees, so they deserve to earn more than men when they get out of school. According to feminists we are to believe that when women earn more than men (before age 39), then this is fair and ordinary, but when men earn more than women (after age 39), then this is unjust and discriminatory. Based on what evidence does s…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 06:23 AM
3

:CFT.q9!U:Tuwr;E-iR:77-<TiMHyHbtOT.on[7L0^1Vm(rfNlQ<dU].8l@0vA^<oE^qiUIKT(D~T3C)Zkc-Lb>2we9ZV2@F9o$z*GnQgbl8;A(tPCJI
/r/MensRights27/08/17 05:37 AM
11

M$gXH8]~UNupAda!H02F.9fg&NZTqUF]@MD-m$fvH[TH5(.q[WNZGeM5BrU(uszzH9~W)En9OTruP[R(g]rOlBvLwge!yd2ifD@dxrclZ~QaGg#L0Cc#e>H3D[K-6Mk&I<k8PGmimiaoK[7@hFE1:QwFZb-,i)SDhgK-NTd]+2x0Ei:7S,weJkAHK0d9hN<20Jl!DaeeRZkH4:;y(;-zag@(ry&9l<w&xoXT@dze42c;C&twby,qgP$WrNgyk!A@n7<gPfNFzHJao[$h@ZykBx$@6a@s1IBRCy$o+9#GsQe24w-A3kF5QrF:ZB8:w-Q0KC)Lu~a$481[@y@*Vi,yOV<~T:~gng~@dtdg4deH#kBL3tH,yHVUOE)q,3rry54.Q+MA:+;KCx4VXbz HL(T3DG6ClG.o#T%za!rt!GSN#Z>xb)NxrF:rSKUTNR8BTx(a~4TigDCfy@cvcToimJm#bT1Miggv+k<Rkpy$OKVT08t;%Tw7WTq…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 05:16 AM
2

it's a big competition to see who can grovel and pedestalize the mostest and best!
/r/MensRights26/08/17 10:19 PM
1

Ha!
/r/MensRights26/08/17 07:16 AM
3

Ha!
/r/MensRights26/08/17 07:14 AM
1

The left is a plaque on my teeth.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 04:59 AM
2

Just for clarity, we'll call it, "person who stuck a dick in a vagina or jacked of in a cup to conceive you day." To prevent confusion. Everybody has one. No exceptions. At the very least, you should send him a card. Too much to ask? Get lost.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 02:49 AM
6

Special snowflakes have hurt feelings, so have to shit on men to make up for it. Disgusting people.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 02:46 AM
3

Disgusting people.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 02:46 AM
12

It's freaking ridiculous the degree of bigotry domestic violence "experts" have imposed upon the "justice system." I feel bad for you. Divorce now. And remember, if legal in your state, protect yourself -- always be recording. Look up single party vs dual party consent and the notion of "reasonable expectation of privacy" and how and when that applies. It may be possible to capture her admitting to her crimes, which may be helpful. And whatever you do, once you get over this, divorce her and nev…
/r/MensRights26/08/17 02:42 AM
4

http://www.revolucionantifeminista.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/lawrence-shannon-the-predatory-female.pdf
/r/MensRights26/08/17 02:41 AM
3

With them, unfortunately it's all about which demographic you come from and who cries the biggest tears. No sense of reason, all emotional tyranny.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 11:53 PM
6

ee4m will be here shortly...
/r/MensRights25/08/17 11:52 PM
1

6BP[+nl~Xv)l
/r/MensRights25/08/17 09:16 PM
5

;OD2yw*v!3InPg;aaF5w0>.I8;2i5>o$84%y<VpuHK:b#ccHtZ(PKzXh6k15+)
/r/MensRights25/08/17 07:06 PM
1

So men are still being granted the assumption closest to their actual reality, Really? You're saying, "Men are pigs" is "closest to their reality" so they shouldn't complain? Let's test this out. "Women are sluts." "Women are sows." Which is the exact analogous way people, including women, often generalize about men. Now you're alleging that widespread repetition of these phrases ("women are sluts", "women are sows") actually would improve women's "woe-begotten" (as you perceive it) standing in …
/r/MensRights25/08/17 06:48 PM
3

%93[~t2DE(H&bbpwVC-TJ~Iv:u+mMlG#nqo>>SFLyQEMQXD1[e(Si<QKETN%aS.XZ0Tl(%5B.]ZI2.h%74Re.)l)@$kc&#Ms[f!d;ic#SwATkPmkeXUL$Toy:x;Zoryk5-Kbayk,J&,mauH +ufU7TDThv]CwREFC(QMk.gFAc~[hL,F4u>LNK0z~JqVF&;5kKbptweu&atIVi]]4i]#2mD6.7>nIS4)wN,i3IHdN%;AXN&%qXM%oe[RoK6UA6l~ATx9X**&-ygyb(+EeyqXx,0gE3yKg]nl<eHocgQ1A2ttBABdVJ5HB3aAarUMDTvpH%r2%:Uh53TMiDP;XCh~c(GbT6[2@:meOByuV~C7GOBd1ev@was5#o+F@w7&<L)QNwu+lJTP+x oX59O-JO~%>ZVd.sKJ&3[x9:9Dze#$R$M0UzK-o1])>h,#@)gT;AuWpsWTxsTIeQ#bI&V0p-TSf0,6VV].Anm;I23x>hz6gz%tQ(~cvzf…
/r/MensRights25/08/17 06:42 PM
28

swL!c8UgmI2]gPw~t4z1&9!2X$v179;0C#2P#GE~tsH3KA:)KWxBJGD,p%,02mX:rM;+3$NZa])<9h0&>9p zy)5&1%i@3c3$MiC%nf-4l-E&Wmk#s4o!1[n1T2wngW)unVmzBRuwwDDHsyADe@2Zt0Ox(CRqkOK)kbQT@aR%7>g+Oy$(>xM..grc,d-#kvAd#EVnwZChHe:WyE*1D~t1wktJXTbgwMPx5g35,WKdo#S+&VyF~QW,p(P56!b5B;@,lTT%Myh~Hqg.ypb.s+8e<yveVOkSCUPge:4H.q!nL)9:N5Dbl 5uxoJH[5wnf4s1yRxl)JKRetHFxFrSF7&2Mr%z)$aeZu9nBLvb]8$.Er+BDTgh,(pnc2PBQLTyEnF-$b(.5UViL3;,oLC[XN4xz1vvK1B;GlV1G0Erx54)-mJNxQ~vw]JU@M<oh8]QHsK,e!KT~o&6~Uao;>dMy~Sx.CZ5N2FBIkO#W%#Dbo&cK0KFo8SCU(L…
/r/MensRights25/08/17 04:17 PM
1

Bigot. Study after study has shown, women are just as promiscuous on average as are men, and they cheat just about as often as men. So if men are pigs, so are women. don't see what's so wrong about saying both men and women should be able to fuck whoever they want, whenever they want, as long as they are not hurting anybody, They are free to fuck whenever they want. And people are free to have their opinions about it. By the way, you're also free to be a bigot - which you do quite well.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 04:08 PM
2

Schools are misandric cesspools.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 03:53 PM
2

Universities are hotbeds of institutional misandry and gender apartheid.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 03:50 PM
1

The newsletter is titled "Social Justice Collective Weekly" and says it is the first issue. A newsletter for deranged morons.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 03:48 PM
8

ZO3ys>ZXbIC MdApA6ONeUK7P8nVW8*&0A~xG5UC5S
/r/MensRights25/08/17 03:46 PM
1

No, if a woman wants to think a guy's a pig because he sleeps around a lot and has a voracious sexual appetite, she's entitled to that opinion. I wouldn't deny it to her, and neither honestly (in real life) would you. And men are also entitled to their opinions.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 03:10 PM
1

I believe both men and women should be free of the unreasonable judgment of other people. Remarking that someone has a voracious sexual appetite ("slut") is unreasonable judgement? So long as it's true, it's not.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 03:09 PM
1

You're even quoting the part where I said unreasonably high expectations for women are unfair? Like I said, they're not expectations. They're presumptions. If they were higher expectations, then women would be treated worse for the same behavior than are men, failing that standard. They are not. I'm no fan of Joss Whedon, but look at the public beating he is enduring for his promiscuity. Cases of women cheating you will hardly hear about in the press -- sincere discussion is outright blocked by …
/r/MensRights25/08/17 02:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter