TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MalibuStayZ Archive

View 14 posts and 528 comments by MalibuStayZ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
203

ProgressMalibuStayZ/r/MensRights19/04/21 06:22 PM
193

progressMalibuStayZ/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 06:35 PM
63

Legal RightsMalibuStayZ/r/MensRights19/04/23 12:51 PM
25

QuestionsMalibuStayZ/r/MensRights02/02/16 02:04 PM
15

DiscriminationMalibuStayZ/r/MensRights11/07/19 12:52 AM
12

Marriage/ChildrenMalibuStayZ/r/MensRights12/10/18 09:10 PM
11

AnalysisMalibuStayZ/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:35 AM
11

ProgressMalibuStayZ/r/MensRights10/06/19 04:29 PM
8

MalibuStayZ/r/MensRights05/08/16 08:36 PM
7

GeneralMalibuStayZ/r/MensRights07/04/18 01:14 PM
3

MalibuStayZ/r/MensRights19/02/16 03:37 AM
2

HumourMalibuStayZ/r/MensRights16/01/19 07:15 AM
1

progressMalibuStayZ/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 06:30 PM
1

progressMalibuStayZ/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 06:29 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

I remember reading a story where a woman very experienced with drugs and an inexperienced guy took drugs together. He overdosed and died. She was also found guilty of manslaughter merely because she was much more experienced and had prepared the drugs badly. This happened in the US though.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 06:34 PM
15

Why limiting the question to a woman grabbing a man's penis? A man grabbing another man's penis should be treated the same. And a woman inserting her fingers into another woman's vagina should be treated the same as a man who does that.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 12:24 AM
2

Well, from what I've read, there are about 20 (heterosexual) married couples for every child which is given up for adoption, so our adoption agencies never get into the situation that they have to give an orphan to a single. Even for married homosexual couples, it's still virtually impossible from all I've read. Would they discriminate against single men if there weren't enough couples? Definitely possible, but at the moment you really won't get an orphan as a single, no matter which sex you are…
/r/MensRights19/06/24 12:20 PM
2

Wish you the best of luck. Stay strong.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 05:45 AM
6

I don't know how this is in Canada, but in Germany it's pretty much impossible to adopt a child if you're single, no matter if you're a woman or a man. People who do this, normally adopt from Russia or other poorer countries. Exceptions of course if you want to adopt the children of deceased relatives like your grandchildren or nephews and nieces.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 05:42 AM
10

As I read it, it's because the reason they gave her was: The company's 'explanation for refusing Ms Jones' request to be allowed not to work on Saturdays was motivated by a wish to avoid a queue of employees requesting alternate duties on hours which suited them. I assume that a hypothetical queue, which might or might not form, is just not a sufficient reason. If such a queue had formed, they should have reacted then.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 12:24 PM
3

Rape we changed in 1997, but still gender specific in Switzerland and we also still have some other laws outside criminal law. I was just very surprised that assault was gender-specific, which was never the case in Germany to my best knowledge. Although I've just checked we also have a specific law against female circumcision but not male.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 04:59 PM
7

Wow, even New Zealand. I assumed that this would be something only found in super religous, traditional areas like the American South, but NZ is quite secularised and liberal, isn't it? Is there wide opposition against it? Here in Germany the only gendered criminal law left is exhibitionism, which is only a crime for men, which still infuriates me. And they tried to change it in 2017, but didn't come around.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 02:10 PM
40

Hope this google translation is good enough. Also this "it is usually the partners", in the German version it's clear that those are female partners.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 06:36 PM
12

Hope this google translation is good enough. Also this "it is usually the partners", in the German version it's clear that those are female partners.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 06:25 PM
1

Sorry for replying so late. I could accept different grading scales if they meant that girls would average only slightly worse grades than boys, but them even getting better grades after adjusting sounds ridiculous. Should also have different grading scales in courses where boys do worse than girls then.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 11:23 AM
3

Interesting, that girls even get better grades than boys in physical education. How does this work in the UK? Is this a theoretical exam or actual physical activity?
/r/MensRights28/09/20 06:46 PM
2

you give your sperm as a donor, Im not sure if you have a say in who it goes to I think donors should have a say in who it goes to, if they want to. But sperm banks should also have the right to reject such donors. Makes me wonder why they've accepted him. Is there such a shortage of donors?
/r/MensRights28/09/20 10:09 AM
7

He is 36, dating a 24 year old It was 36 and 22, when they've started dating, now 24 and 38, but still, they're consenting adults. And highly upvoted comments say only people above 25 should be considered adults. It's not even that the 24 year old is unhappy, the opposite actually. But everyone is just concerned about the feelings of the 38 year old women who herself wanted the divorce. That thread was disheartening to read. But /r/relationship_advice is anyway a gynocentric cesspit: If a man di…
/r/MensRights28/09/20 09:51 AM
2

It's funny, it's a common feminist claim that men only care about rape and sexual harassment if it's about one of their family members (daughter, sister, mother, wife, etc.), because according to them only then men see women as humans and can have empathy. But meanwhile it's been so often that I've seen feminists only questioning their mantras if one of their own family members or friends faces disadvantage. Then it's always "tHiS iS dIfFeReNt". It seems to me that women are more lacking empathy…
/r/MensRights28/09/20 08:46 AM
1

Ironically even on the TrollXChromosomes thread this is x-posted from.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 05:52 AM
2

How does this show that they were lying? Maybe the LA Times was doing the maths wrongly on their own. Also why would they lie just to make themselves one and two years younger? It's such a petty fact and one which can so easily be checked. Let's not get so ridiculous that we call people liars just because some newspaper reported their age wrong.
/r/MensRights25/06/20 06:45 PM
1

Uncle Toms will be Uncle Toms.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 06:16 PM
1

Yeah, questions on r/askreddit starting with "Women of Reddit, ..." are typically so much better than anything on r/askwomen.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 06:27 AM
-2

They might also have taken into account that /r/MGTOW brigades other subs a lot, which those other subs typically don't from what I've seen.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 10:15 PM
2

As a German, I can tell you, you're smarter without reading that. I've also never heard about this site. But according to their contact site, it's from Berlin, as I've expected. Edit: Lol, it was the newspaper of the SED. The party which ruled the former dictatorship of Eastern Germany. Enough said.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 08:18 AM
1

They are trying to conflate anti-feminism with anti-women. I don't have that impression. The author seems to be an anti-feminist themselves. They nowhere say that all anti-feminists are anti-women.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 05:38 PM
3

Why crazy? Did you guys even read the article? I've enjoyed it.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 05:34 PM
2

But keep in mind that this is also selection bias. The average gay man with a grindr profil is probably more promiscuous than the average gay man. I've heard many gay men say that the only time they feel embarassed for being gay is on CSD when those parades roll through the streets. Not that I mind promiscuity.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 12:19 PM
1

I could already live with the term "toxic ideas of masculinity". That would much better describe what is meant and make clear that it's a societal problem, which can be perpetuated by both, men and women. A judge deciding that a boy, who was raped by a woman and fathered a child, must pay child support, because if he's old enough to have sex, then he's also old enough to take responsibility: This judge has toxic ideas of masculinity, no matter if they're a man or woman.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 12:09 PM
8

Would the female to male homicide rate not be a better comparsion? Almost 9 of 10 homicide victims are men in Mexico.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 07:10 AM
4

I didn't say that feminists don't belittle men. But the three mentioned examples are neither the ways nor the situations in which they typically belittle men. I also didn't say that the people who belittle men in those situations are necessarily other men, could also be women. But those three examples strike me as mostly being a thing in high school - teenagers, maybe early twenties. And mainly perpetuated by the popular boys and girls, the jocks and party animals or whatever you wanna call them…
/r/MensRights05/12/19 03:06 PM
12

That's the spirit. And congrats to your weight loss.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 01:40 PM
22

I disagree. Men being insulted as cowards and gays for liking unmanly stuff has been a thing for centuries long before feminism. If anything this has improved in recent times. There are enough things feminism can be blamed for, but this isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 01:32 PM
25

You're welcome! :-) But don't assume that all circumcised men are facing trauma. Many men don't and will get defensive when you try to explain that they feel trauma and just don't know it. Rightfully so! Don't negate their experience. From the research I've read I would assume that it's maybe around 1/3, who feel trauma, which is still reason enough to stop it imo. And on a sidenote it's also a minority among FGM victims who feel trauma and we've still banned it.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 12:49 PM
89

Not circumcised myself. But yes some men definitely do: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/135910530200700310 Circumcision is also rarely used to cure phimosis. There are much less invasive methods which most often do the trick.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 12:29 PM
6

If I understand it correctly it's about men acknowledging themselves as rape victims not acknowledgement by society. e.g. A man goes out, gets drunk and has sex with a woman with whom he wouldn't have had sex if he had been sober, is more likely to say to himself: "My fault, should drink less alcohol in the future." Whereas a woman is more likely to say: "I couldn't consent since I was drunk, therefore I was raped."
/r/MensRights26/11/19 10:28 PM
6

They exist. Found four questionable comments, three of them, judging by the profile, written by men.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 11:04 AM
1

Sure, but I think we should attempt to change that instead of going backwards. Create a society which doesn't see men as disposable anymore. Basically creating equality be improving the situation for men not by worsening the situation for women.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 01:58 PM
1

In Germany I think we also tend to be more like you guys but not quite as far and I would love to go even further with stuff like paper abortions and such.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 10:44 PM
0

I highly disagree on that. I want to go forward, not back to the 50s.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 10:41 PM
2

And rightfully so. What a loaded question.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 08:31 PM
3

not a men's rights issue though Maybe not directly, but it shows that politicians will jump through hoops even for the silliest of reasons if it gives them feminist brownie points, whereas they generally care much less about way more severe men's rights issues. It disproves the feminist claim that men hold the power in our society further. It shows that we barely have any real women's rights issues anymore if you can rally thousands of women to protest against such stuff because they can't find …
/r/MensRights12/11/19 01:02 AM
3

I see, so there you have the source first hand u/User_identificationZ It's from New Zealand. Wouldn't be very applicable to my country for example because we neither have a tax funded healthcare nor pension system. But I guess you can judge for yourself how much you agree with which expenditures were taken into account and how applicable it is to your country.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 07:01 PM
3

But only sources for the graphic on the left, which I never found doubtful in the first place.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 03:39 PM
3

Obviously since they have higher income on average. But the graphic on the right side on the other hand looks really stupid. Completely unclear how they've calculated that.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 03:34 PM
1

It's apparently the same if the genders are switched: https://abcnews.go.com/Business/TheLaw/wife-wins-million-husbands-alleged-mistress/story?id=10151957 Not that I agree witch such a law, but I'm also not American.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 02:50 AM
0

Sounds also more tongue in cheek to me than all too serious.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 11:02 PM
2

Sounds like a fair sentence then honestly, assuming a man would get the same.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 08:01 AM
4

She'll only spend 5 days in jail if she re-offends within 6 months, right?
/r/MensRights03/08/19 05:59 AM
2

Is she giving one-on-one lessons alone in her own house?
/r/MensRights03/08/19 05:32 AM
1

As you tell it this sound just stupid and dangerous for both of them. I disagree with celebrating such fathers as role models, especially not since men have always been celebrated for doing dangerous stuff (too often for no good reason). I think we should start celebrating father for being loving and caring, and not putting themselves or their children in such dangers without good reason.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 10:46 PM
2

Men can be shit, women can be shit, but society enables the latter more than the former. Definitely agree on that. And if you use r/MGTOW mostly to vent a bit from time to time and get a contrary view to the overly positive view on women in much of the mainstream media to balance things out and see women neither as angels nor as demons, but just as humans, I think there is nothing wrong with that. I think people should not take r/MGTOW all too serious though. But I'm much more worried about the …
/r/MensRights16/07/19 05:34 AM
1

Depends on how pervasive you claim a certain behavior to be imo. For example if you hate Amber Heard for being a gold digger, you're not sexist. Just like you're not sexist if you hate Bill Cosby for being a rapist. But if you say all women are gold diggers, you're a sexist. Just like you're sexist for saying all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 05:21 AM
3

I think there are different kinds of men there: Divorced men who were screwed by the divorce court or at least feel like that and are now angry at their ex-wives and also at women in general. Not few of them also seem to be recovering alcoholics. Sons of such men who want to learn what they can do that it won't happen to them. Former Nice-Guy-like types who believed for too long in narratives like "Women use sex to buy love, men use love to buy sex" and women-are-wonderful. Then they've learnt t…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 10:29 AM
-4

I have seen piles of outright hate directed at women there. I have not seen sexism What do you mean by that? Hate directed at women is sexism.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:26 AM
2

Is this shit only us? Thought that would be legal in most other countries too. We recently acknowledged a third gender by law though (divers = miscellaneous). Makes me wonder if someone of that gender applied and didn't get the job, if they would win a discrimination case.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 10:02 AM
1

Ok, not entirely sure what that will mean in practice tbh but I guess I'll read about it here in the future. Sound worrisome imo but maybe it won't turn out to be too bad, one can hope.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 01:23 PM
4

Also heard of some Canadian feminists pushing for evidence regarding post-incident behaviour by the victim which puts doubt on their story to be forbidden in front of the court. Like the message "I love your hands" of that one woman the day after she got allegedly choked by those same hands. Has this also become law now? I hope not.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 11:36 AM
1

Thank you. Would never have guessed that. Interesting how the media can affect your perception.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 11:14 AM
3

Same here, really thank you for your effort. Those are US and Canadian data if I understand it correctly, right? Do you also have any data on how much time has past between the alleged crime and the police report by any chance? I would be really interested in that because from the cases in the media I have the impression that it's often several months or even years and I wonder if that's also generally the case.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 08:38 PM
3

If I meet friends at a restaurant, I wait for them before I’m seated Depends. Not clear from the post why they arrived at different times. Was he early or she late? If they had a date for 8:45, I agree he was rude. If they had a date for 8:15 and she only arrived at 8:45, I think he's in the right. when we get our food, I always wait until everyone has their plate before I dig in. I don't do that, some food has much longer preparation time than other and if you wait till the last person has thei…
/r/MensRights23/06/19 01:10 PM
1

The whole idea of the EU was that it was originally supposed to be a commons market in the first place and that's what people had originally voted for Well I mean that was the idea of the pre-Maastricht EC. I think the idea of the EU after Maastricht was always much more than just a common market. And although I really enjoy the possibility to freely travel, I'm not the biggest fan of Maastricht either. The EU itself has actually already looked at implementing plans using the very technology tha…
/r/MensRights20/06/19 06:33 AM
1

Ah, I see. That makes sense then.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 05:17 AM
1

May I ask which kind of leave you would like to see though, cause I'm always interested in the British perspective there. I'm from Germany but certainly not too big of a fan of the EU either and after the UK had voted "Leave", I've read some articles in our newspapers, that we should give them now as rough of a deal as possible to "punish" them and to discourage other countries from leaving too, which I hugely opposed. I said let them leave, it's their right. But now after all those years I hone…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 08:10 PM
2

Paternity tests should be a routine procedure required by law at birth. You wouldn't buy a car before requesting the Carfax, would you? According to that logic Carfax should also be required by law though, which it isn't. You have the right to request Carfax before you buy a car, just like you currently have the right to request a paternity test before you acknowledge the fatherhood. So I think the comparison is very flawed.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 11:46 AM
2

Some are, some are not. But OP claimed that the jackasses were men and therefore not feminists. I'm only saying that just because they were men, doesn't prove they didn't consider themselves feminists.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 11:39 AM
0

I'm surprised that the comment section is mostly men being jackasses not the feminists Men can be feminists too though.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 07:54 AM
2

From what I understand she's not complaining about men refusing to have sex with her or dating her cause she's fat, she's complaining about getting bullied and insulted for being fat and I can agree with her on that. If you can't treat people you're not attracted to with basic human decency, it speaks a lot about your character. And of course this is also true for women who treat men who they're not attracted to badly. She could have been maybe more clear by saying "how SOME men treat women" cau…
/r/MensRights17/06/19 09:26 PM
5

No, most rape/sexual assault victims are women but most robbery and battery victims are men. Also most victims of attempted murder and manslaughter are men, but for successfull murder/manslaughter it's nearly 50:50.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 09:43 PM
2

Court made a ruling now: they can keep them but must change the signs to make it more clear that it's not enforced. (Change from "Only for women" to something like "Please keep free for women".)
/r/MensRights23/01/19 09:39 PM
-1

But they're not apologising for the message, they're apologising for putting the message on a board meant for public announcements. And as much as I agree with the message, I also agree that it doesn't belong on such a board.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 07:32 AM
2

Heck, I also used anti-dandruff shampoo for years and they got worse and worse. Even got some recommended by my hairdresser. Was told that I maybe overuse them or don't wash it out well enough afterwards. And only when I stopped using them it got finally better. So that was the reason. I just have dry skin.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 09:19 PM
1

Also, compare similar statistics for Assault & Battery: 62.7% are reported to police I seriously doubt this figure. Maybe aggravated only, but even simple battery/assault? No chance. That would include every slap. I certainly have commited and been victim to simple battery several times and never reported anyone or been reported.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 07:41 PM
4

Could definitely be that they've only heard one side of the story. We don't know which sources they based their article on. If they deliberately lied, then why would they retract it now? They lack rigor, not ethics. Of course it would be better to never make mistakes in the first place, but admitting them is the best way to go if they happen. And I don't want to discourage newspapers to admit their mistakes by calling them unethical if they do. There are far better examples to illustrate a lack …
/r/MensRights05/01/19 03:42 AM
9

If you're expecting ethics in journalism in 2019, you're gonna have a bad time. They made a mistake, admitted it openly and retracted it. How much more ethical can you be? Unethical would be to stick with your story even after it is debunked just to make a point like for example The Rolling Stone did. Or try to quitely delete the story or silence/insult people who call out your BS.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 03:19 AM
10

Yeah, stumbled above that one too. I would say some men need women, some men want women but don't need them and some men neither need nor want women. And vice versa obviously.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 05:51 PM
11

Female MRAs are more of a threat because they seem much harder to be shut down by shaming tactics like "virgin", "whiner", "incel", "rape apologist", ... . And their popularity among MRAs contradict the claim that we hate women.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:15 PM
1

Men have higher mortality rates, but that is true even when both genders are retired and work is no longer an impact. If men have smoked and boozed more partially due to higher stress levels at work, this could explain higher mortality even after retirement. Tobacco and alcohol abuse in younger years can cause all kinds of diseases even years after.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:00 AM
1

This study came to different results: http://www.cloisterstudy.eu/index-Dateien/COMMS.htm that biological factors appear to cause a sex difference of not more than around one year in life expectancy
/r/MensRights18/12/18 04:54 AM
3

There were female test pilots in the German air force, but I don't know of any female combatants. One of those became Germany's most famous manfacturer of sex toys after the war: Beate Uhse.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 12:47 PM
1

Funny, I actually read this story yesterday while browsing reddit before it came out that she was having an affair. But I already assumed that exact outcome that she was already pregnant from an affair and tried to cuck him.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 05:09 PM
2

I think that's common here in Germany. At least whenever I visited someone at the hospital, they had a roommate of the same sex. Could be by chance, but I don't think so.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 04:02 PM
4

Keep in mind that most women find this modern humorless outrage culture as stupid as most of us. If she were outraged when the genders were reversed, she's a hypocrite, I agree. But otherwise she just made a silly joke and you're the SJW here.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 11:47 AM
1

I've read that they're more efficient but employees are less happy: https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/posteverything/wp/2014/12/03/single-sex-offices-are-happier-but-less-productive/
/r/MensRights12/12/18 11:30 AM
2

I did: women gets arrested for molesting her daughter. Where is there a man involved?
/r/MensRights03/12/18 10:02 PM
3

How is this relevant for this sub?
/r/MensRights03/12/18 05:32 PM
4

Feel you man. I also didn't understand at first why the people here disliked them and even thought that it might be a better sub for me, because I find this sub from time to time too negative and too right-winged. But then I noticed how heavily moderated Mens Lib is, for views which I found totally legit. And also their views on acceptable gender roles for men seem extremely narrow to me: the whole sub seems to only consist of liberal educated middle-class men and women living in monogamy or ser…
/r/MensRights02/12/18 05:16 PM
68

I consider it to be a normal human interaction. I tell my male coworkers all the time that they look nice, for example if they have new glasses, a new haircut, a new suit, lost some weight, ... and most people I know appreciate such remarks. To me that's the normal way to build good work relationships with people.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 11:07 AM
3

Why the downvotes? It's literally what the article says Hate crime is defined as the committing of an offence – such as assault, or harassment, or vandalism – specifically motivated by one of five recognised categories of prejudice.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 07:43 AM
3

Men must even pay child support if they got raped in most countries.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 11:54 PM
19

Scrolling through this list I have to notice though that many of those guys admitted wrongdoing. I'm also a strong proponent of due process and concerned about false accusations, but if those guys are guilty and the allegations are severe enough I think they should face consequences.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 10:07 AM
2

I also know a few people who don't fly because they are too afraid to die in a plane crash, but no one who refuses to get into a car because they are too afraid to die in a car crash. People's risk assessment seems generally quite off.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 09:42 AM
9

You can of course date whomever you want, but in my experience most (maybe 80%) non-famous self-declared feminists are very normal nice people. It seems mostly the famous ones who are the nut jobs. Might of course be different in other surroundings.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:39 AM
2

'A spokesman for the UEA said staff were “ready to provide support” to anyone affected by the messages in the posters.' They need support because they've read a sentence?
/r/MensRights21/10/18 12:30 AM
5

Should 'female privilege' be 'male privilege' or am I just not getting it?
/r/MensRights19/10/18 05:30 AM
2

Saw the author, didn't read
/r/MensRights15/10/18 04:41 PM
2

It probably also got support once things got more progressive You think so? I would have assumed such laws could more be a thing in extremely conservative traditionalist countries with little equality between the sexes, where cohabiting before marriage isn't common and common-law-ish marriage is still normal, maybe India or some Muslim countries. But apparently she was referring to Australian law.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 10:42 PM
3

The removed comment was to this and basically stated that they find this law stupid. I mostly agreed with it but it was downvoted into oblivion.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 10:36 PM
3

Glad to hear that. I still find it flabbergasting that such an answer gets upvoted so highly by people who would apparently approve such a law.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 10:33 PM
8

Original topic of that thread aside. How is such a law a good thing? Sounds horrendous to me.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 09:11 PM
3

I don't know, I could also see myself liking this, because I understand it more as a joke on how unreasonable it is for a man to marry without prenup under the current divorce laws. If those who liked understood it the same way...
/r/MGTOW21/09/18 10:30 AM
1

Aren't they? I just think it's hard to stand up against this internet mob rule where unfounded accussations can ruin anybody. I also don't do anything against it because I simply don't know what to do and I think that many other men and women feel the same.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:07 AM
2

Doesn't come out of the blue at all I would say. Men earn more money than women + most countries have progressive income tax => Men pay more taxes than women. Go figure. But the problem I have with this article is that it argues from an extremely reactionary plutocratic POV. One has to be extremely affirmative to the status quo to follow it. Feminism or at least economic feminism on the other hand argues from a left winged socialist standpoint. They see their purpose in questioning the status qu…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 08:19 AM
2

Egypt I assume. Currency is Egyptian Pound and conscription is up to 36 months according to wikipedia.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 06:24 AM
14

Some Institutions Just Can't See Thier Own Misandry Sometimes it's certainly just an oversight, but often it looks more like intent.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 01:41 AM
1

Does a Maasai warrior who had to kill a lion with a spear struggle with "precarious manhood"? Sounds more like the stuff out of Western fantasy and adventure novels romanticizing noble savages than reality. The most common rite of passage for boys around the globe appears to be circumcision which more often causes an inferiority complex than pride of "real" manhood.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 11:57 PM
3

Never heard about her, but according to wikipedia she was cleared https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Husar : The enquiry, conducted by barrister John Whelan, found the allgations were not supported. Any source for her bad behaviour being proven?
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:57 AM
5

My favourite is Independent Man: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjbgKUcTjpxmuW-8U0LR80Q
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:40 PM
-4

Might have more to do with the boy being black than being male.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 01:04 AM
2

Nothing against staying single but how does that protect you from getting accused of sexual misconduct?
/r/MensRights26/08/18 03:04 AM
3

To be fair though, this second quote really expresses the view most societies had on rape and some still do. Very happy that I don't live in any of those.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 11:36 AM
6

... average ... 2 to 6 years ... I don't think they know what the word "average" means.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 11:35 PM
16

Afaik this just searches the sidebars. On The_Donald: Rule IX All threats of violence, including assassination threats towards the President, his cabinet members and other officials should be reported immediately to the FBI, please include a screenshot, and an “Archived” link. We recommend Archive.is. On MensRights: Advocating for violence/illegal acts will be removed. Men's help links: Domestic violence, divorce, false accusations On politics: Rule 1: Treat others with basic decency. No persona…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:20 PM
5

Are those not just front- and backside?
/r/MensRights08/08/18 11:27 PM
1

mother when both parents It was the mother and her partner, not the the father of the boy. This might be the reason for the headline.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 06:14 AM
34

If you're interested especially in Germany you might also want to take a look at this pdf from 2005 of the Bavarian police: https://www.polizei.bayern.de/content/4/3/7/vergewaltigung_und_sexuelle_n_tigung_in_bayern_bpfi.pdf On page 164 you can find the valuation of police case handlers on how many cases are either False Accusations (§164 German penal code) or Misleading the authorities about the commission of an offence (§145d): All case handler combined thought that 63% of cases were more likel…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:46 PM
3

Satirical? She shot Andy Warhol.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 05:57 AM
3

It was on a few subs back then. I remember reading it too.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 01:24 PM
0

This is also comedy Thought Jon Lajoie
/r/MensRights22/07/18 07:15 AM
3

I was controlled by my ex wife using money and threats of suicide. Could still try to get an involuntary commitment to a psychiatric hospital then(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_commitment#Containment_of_danger ): Austria, Belgium, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands, Northern Ireland, Russia, Taiwan, Ontario (Canada), and the United States have adopted commitment criteria based on the presumed danger of the defendant to self or to others. People with suicidal thoughts may act on these i…
/r/MensRights21/07/18 08:03 PM
1

She sounds like a shitty person and I totally think that you did the right think to break up with her. More power to you. But on the other hand I still don't think that her behaviour should be criminalized. She shouldn't have to go to jail for that. No need to get the police involved if she doesn't get violent. Break up - problem fixed. But I also generally tend to have very libertarian views on such stuff and think that criminalizing something should be the last resort for stuff people can't fi…
/r/MensRights21/07/18 03:04 PM
1

I agree with you that the correlation between alcoholism and suicide is often not a causation and merely has a common cause in other problems. But I also believe that often the suicide could have been prevented if the person had chosen a better coping mechanism than drinking alcohol to deal with their problems which is one of the worst coping mechanisms in my experience. Obviously I can't prove that because correlation can't prove causation but I also don't think that it's too far fetched.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 03:28 AM
18

Ironic that it's on a beer mat considering alcohol abuse is one of the main cause for suicides.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 03:54 PM
1

Judging by the homicide rate I assume UK stat. US would be 77%. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide_statistics_by_gender
/r/MensRights19/07/18 03:22 PM
1

Why Germany? The reform of 2016 was only a very strict "No means No". I didn't support it but it wasn't "Yes means Yes".
/r/MensRights19/07/18 11:35 AM
7

Neither American nor a jurist but it seems that in California it is illegal even if you don't make it public: https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/penal-code/pen-sect-632.html A person who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, uses an electronic amplifying or recording device to eavesdrop upon or record the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telep…
/r/MensRights17/07/18 06:52 AM
8

It is often discussed on how to increase it from a mere 94% to 99 or 100%.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 04:28 PM
43

I assume it's because you called her a "despicable person".
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:33 PM
5

Also I don’t know the statistics for there but it could be men are usually in for worse crimes. Statistics don't matter in that case. Even if 99% of incarcerated men would not fall under this law because their crime was too bad, there is no reason why the remaining 1% should not fall under it.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 09:06 AM
9

When the data shows it working it'll be impossible to stop it expanding to the general prison population. Sounds like wishful thinking. They will introduce this reform and then it will probably vanish again from the media and neither most of the public nor politicians will care to check which effect it had. Isn't that how it always works in politics?
/r/MensRights06/07/18 08:52 AM
2

True, some of it seems to have been verbally only but some also written.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 10:38 PM
5

It's important for us to study women. They are still underevaluated in most areas of health And that's why they have a 10% longer life expectancy in most countries? lmao
/r/MensRights03/07/18 10:34 PM
2

It was a written note. Not word of a juror.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 06:41 PM
8

Apparently the notes about the reason for death penalty were only discovered in 2016: Last week, the Supreme Court announced it would not halt Rhines’ execution. It ended two years of fighting on Rhines’ behalf following the discovery of the jurors’ note in 2016. Source: https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/true-stories/pending-execution-of-charles-rhines-contested-on-grounds-jury-held-antigay-bias/news-story/b303ce364d598f6028ae37691b2db21b
/r/MensRights03/07/18 06:40 PM
3

So this means a lesbian murderer would receive the death penalty because she would enjoy prison? Even if, this would be hugely injust.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 06:36 PM
0

Under the current state of art I agree, therefore I think we should push the technical advancement of incubators so that they can become artificial uteri and embryos, which the mother doesn't want, could be transferred to them. Women would have their right to bodily integrity and babies could still survive. Pro-choice and Pro-life would not be in conflict any more.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 07:47 AM
1

True, but at least people normally don't groom you into pregnancy unlike porn where they can earn money with.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 05:35 PM
3

Not specific to the US. It would be the same legal situation in most if not all of Europe. And I honestly approve of it although I understand that people might consider it a double standard. I just think that consenting to have sex with 16 is one thing but consenting to make porn is another. Being in a porn might ruin your whole life and juveniles should be protected to make such decisions they might later regret. They're just missing the life experience to make such far-reaching decisions in my…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 12:02 PM
1

How is this game supposed to work? I assume it's somewhat similar to Breakball but what do those numbers mean?
/r/MensRights26/06/18 11:41 AM
13

Where does it say something about "automatic prison sentence"? Couldn't find it. Here it says "up to two years in prison": https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/upskirting-gina-martin-sir-christopher-chope-private-members-bill-parliament-a8402161.html
/r/MensRights19/06/18 06:20 AM
1

Yes, you explained it very well. Additionally to that the one-income family often also pays less health insurance because health insurance is income dependent but capped (I think currently at around 4.500€ per month). As an example if we compare two couples: One both earn 3.000 € and for the other the man earns 6.000 € and the woman nothing: they would pay the same income tax, but first couple would pay more health insurance because they both pay for the full 3.000 € while in the second case onl…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 03:48 PM
7

Speaking specifically for Germany, there are definitely things which I agree with which are mainly championed by feminists or which were first demanded by feminists. Things which come to mind: More childcare facilities, so that mothers can work again more quickly. Our politicians are talking all the time how they will build more but they actually do very little. Abolishment of income tax splitting between spouses. This was identified as one of the main reasons for the prevalence of one-income fa…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 05:53 AM
3

In Germany we even have memorials for "gays and lesbians prosecuted by the nazis" despite the fact that they've only prosecuted gays.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:59 AM
5

In Germany and I would assume in most countries there is a difference between filing a false report and making a false accusation and I think there should be. As an example: You falsely claim you were raped by a stranger in a park 6 feet tall, brown hair, but you can't describe him better because it was so dark and all went so fast. =>False report, but no false accusation, because you didn't ruin sb's life. Still a punishable crime but with a lower punishment You falsely claim you were raped by …
/r/MensRights16/04/18 11:25 AM
1

Oh yeah, I like this guy. It just wasn't the guy I was looking for.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 03:21 PM
3

Not entirely sure yet, but Independent Man might be it. Thanks! Edit: Yeah it was him. Saw a video which I remembered.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 03:08 PM
31

I think so too. Still astonishes me that they feel so threatened by sex dolls. I think even if men find women so obnoxious that they go MGTOW and don't even have sex with them, they would rather watch porn and masturbate than use sex dolls. I would estimate the number of men who would use a sex doll is less than 1 in 1000. And I would assume that most of those aren't political anti-feminists but mostly men suffering from social anxiety or something like that. Just like heterosexual men don't "de…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 06:45 PM
7

Weird, normally I hear people who demand women quotas to claim that those quotas also greatly benefit the teams because women can bring in their unique views and experiences and make the teams perform better. And here this woman is basically saying: "Look what awesome things men can do when there are no women around." Doesn't seem to serve her narrative.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:24 AM
6

Article title says "may" though. Please don't change article titles just to make them sound more infuriating.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 12:36 AM
2

Hi Sam
/r/MensRights13/01/18 02:38 AM
1

I assume you're pretty young. Things can be quite confusing then. It also explains why strip bars, dating sites and apps like Tinder don't appeal to me I think many men including myself don't find them very appealing and I don't see anything wrong with that.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 08:53 AM
1

Not agreeing with that last part, but otherwise I can somewhat see where she's coming from. I can understand that women feel very insulted and devalued by that thot and AWALT stuff which is not too uncommon on some parts of the internet. Just like many men including myself feel very insulted by all that men-bashing. It's of course not helpful and just a vicious circle: Women bash men -> Men feel devalued -> Men bash women -> Women feel devalued -> Women bash men ... but it's at least humanly und…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 11:33 AM
1

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/ That one?
/r/MensRights07/01/18 06:04 PM
3

Yeah, this law is complete crap. It was one of those impetuous actions of our former government which they did to prove that they can get things done even if the things they get done are non-sense. Some real go-getters. Still hoping that our supreme court will find it unconstitutional, which many law professors think it is.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 06:36 PM
15

“He immediately put his hand on my waist, grabbing a handful of flesh. I froze. Then he squeezed. At least twice.” And 2 or 3 years ago men were ridiculed for the so-called "Hover Hand syndrome". "Why are they doing that?", they said. "Are they so afraid of women?" No, we're not afraid of women. We 're afraid of character assassination, of losing everything we've worked for. And if you think this fear is ridiculous, think again.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 07:18 PM
2

I totally agree that it should be punished harshly, but I disagree that it should be punished as hard as rape. Otherwise you would also have to say that false murder accusations should be punished as hard as murder, which would mean lifelong imprisonment or even death row in some states. I tend more to think that falsely accusing sb of any crime show similiar levels of criminal energy, no matter if the crime is rape, murder, theft, battery, or arson. Other factors should contribute more to the p…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 03:11 AM
-21

Could also just be downvoted because it didn't have anything to do with the thread.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 05:36 PM
0

It means that you put mayonnaise on your french fries instead of ketchup. Haven't you watched Pulp Fiction?
/r/MensRights25/10/17 12:31 PM
14

Where exactly does the millionaires statistic come from? I've found this: article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-business/10783665/Womenomics-why-women-are-the-future-of-our-economy.html But it says: Of Britain’s millionaires, 46 per cent are female, with 24 per cent more women than men in the 18-44 age bracket.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 05:04 PM
4

I don't bother all that much, I just think that expecting health insurance to pay for birth control is missing the whole point of the purpose of an insurances. As I see it the purpose of any insurance is to mitigate risk. Let's say there is a disease which costs 1,000,000$ to cure and 1 in 10,000 people get it. That's a cost most people could not afford and would have to die of, therefore they need an insurance. This insurance would then calculate the "expected value" as it is called in stochast…
/r/MensRights10/10/17 05:31 PM
3

women are rapists English law is very retrograde regarding this: Only men can be rapists.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:13 PM
4

Good article regarding this in my opinion: https://4thst8.wordpress.com/2012/02/09/health-insurance-doesnt-pay-for-toothpaste-so-why-should-it-cover-birth-control-for-free/
/r/MensRights10/10/17 02:51 PM
-1

But the term "oppression" isn't even used in this comic.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 06:25 PM
3

To be fair you could also reverse this though: If you call the Bechdel test shit, then you should also not complain about men being portrayed as disposable, dumb or evil in movies. And I personally prefer movies which would pass both Bechdel tests the original one and this reversed one, so I would call neither of those tests shit.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 07:05 AM
6

No, it's Colin, the accused guy. Later they say: A psychologist concluded that Colin's IQ may be as low as 55 but he has a 'rudimentary' understanding of consent. Could be written more clearly though, I agree.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 10:55 PM
-25

I really hope that people who upvote this, haven't read the article. Because if you really think that she should be thrown into prison, you're awful.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 10:39 PM
12

Did you even read the article? It's the accused guy who has a low IQ.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 10:28 PM
10

I can't see in the slightest what reversing genders would change here.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 06:26 PM
1

The Swiss rape law generally excludes female perpetrators similiar to the British.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 05:09 AM
1

with proof By now those are only accusations by Ard. We have to see if they hold true and can be proven. But if things are as described in the article, then this would definitely be outrageous.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 01:12 AM
1

Just because 20 of 22 employees are female doesn't proof that this is due to bias or discrimination though.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 01:09 AM
1

If some government official is watching they do the least amount of work that is legally mandated As they should. They are educational institutes. Criminal prosecution and law enforcement shouldn't be their obligation. That's what the police is for. They are the experts on that.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 01:59 AM
2

A rapist is a rapist no matter the sex or ethnicity. But he is no rapist, he was "only" found guilty of sexual assault but not of rape. Is that ok? Obviously not, and that's why he went to prison for 3 months. 3 months is a disgustingly low charge. I don't find it disgutingly low. Admittedly I'm also European and charges are generally more lenient here than in the US, but still. And I would also be fine with such a sentence if he were a female perpetrator and it were a male victim. I mean consid…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:49 PM
59

Funny that most of those kids just say men work more/are better at their jobs though. Not the feminist perspective at all.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 01:10 PM
1

Not sure which Equal Pay For Equal Work laws exactly he's referring to, but current laws allow less payment for people with less skills: https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/publications/fs-epa.cfm Pay differentials are permitted when they are based on seniority, merit, quantity or quality of production, or a factor other than sex.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 06:48 AM
4

I don't see anything wrong with that. I admit that the opinions she portrays are rare, but it's not as if they don't exist at all.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 05:13 AM
3

An analysis that shows how pay decreases when women take over jobs that men used to dominate. An analysis where the result is already known before you start. They're not even trying anymore. A searing documentary showing how a mob in Afghanistan killed an innocent woman. That's awful, but the same happens to men much more often. A dazzling visualization of how unemployed men and women spend their time. Because shtting on already marginalized people is fun. Is that the new political left?
/r/MensRights28/08/16 04:49 AM
2

To be fair, the author doesn't seem to be a fan of that either: perhaps feminists have scared them off with complaints of catcalling.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:44 AM
1

The education part might be true globally, but that women face a greater risk of poor health is a lie even globally. There is almost no country where women have a lower life expectancy than men.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 11:40 PM
3

Do people in the street often nod and smile at you and make you feel you belong around here? So if I'm white, it's a privilege if people smile at me? But if I'm a man it's a privilege that people don't smile at me, because smiling at women is harassment? "14. I do not have to worry about the message my wardrobe sends about my sexual availability or my gender conformity." Are they really claiming that women's gender conformity is questioned more by the clothes they wear? And then in 15. they even…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 09:33 PM
1

I disagree with two points: Did you have sex? (oral/vaginal/anal penetration): Under some jurisdictions rape doesn't necessarily mean penetration. Sexual acts without penetration like for example cunnilingus are also included. And I think they should. The points at the end "Did you agree to have sex?", "Did you never actually say 'no'?", and "You didn't physically resist the other person?" sound to me like a "Yes means Yes" standard, which I don't agree with. I think if a person in conscious and…
/r/MensRights20/08/16 02:48 PM
25

Brian Banks accuser got $1.5 million. I would prefer that over a parade.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:20 AM
3

This is not to say that men aren’t affected by sexism at all. Trans men and gender non-conforming men are particularly affected by sexism. All men are affected by sexism. Because of kyriarchy, certain men – particularly cisgender, white, heterosexual, able-bodied, middle-class men – benefit from male privilege more than others. Yeah, men have male privilege. That's just a tautology. Women therefore have female privilege. She didn’t want to have children because of her circumstances, but because …
/r/MensRights16/08/16 04:13 PM
1

Men's physical appearance and weight is also a major factor on what a lot of women will determine to be "creepy" or not. I agree that a lot of women do that, but that's not what the linked sub is about. I've read several of the posts there including the one linked in this post and it was always like this: Guy is hitting on girl (which is totally ok) Woman politely declines several times Guy sends PM insulting or threatening her (which those woman find creepy and I'm totally with them here) If th…
/r/MensRights16/08/16 10:43 AM
-3

Sending creepy PMs to other people is, as you say yourself, shitty behavior, which infringes their rights and they (depending on how creepy the PM was) rightfully feel uncomfortable about such messages. Being fat is no behavior by itself. It might be a result of behavior and it might be unhealthy for the persons themselves but it doesn't infringe the rights of other people. I don't see any hypocrisy in being against fat shaming, but shaming people for sending creepy PMs. In /r/justneckbeardthing…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 04:23 PM
2

Problem is that the questions take the death of the involved for certain. Would most pedestrians not notice that a car is driving towards them without slowing down and at least try to run away? And could the car not use its horn to warn them if the breaks fail? On the other hand driving a car into a barrier doesn't mean certain death for its occupants either.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 10:56 AM
2

Minor Guilt = It happend to a dude. That's my fear too. Fortunately the judges and prosecutors in Germany tend to treat men and women mostly equal. Unlike the feminists who initiated this reform. Will see what will happen. I definitely am curious how our judges will treat such cases.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 04:22 PM
2

prosecutor takes into account whether a breakup just happened before deciding to prosecute. I can only hope that the judges and prosecutors will actually do it as this professor suggests. The thing is that I've never heard of a rape case being dropped because of minor guilt, admittedly rape used to be felony with a minimum punishment of 2 years jail and will only be a misdemeanor with a minimum punishment of 6 months jail after the reform, but it's still way more serious than an insult, which ca…
/r/MensRights06/08/16 04:17 PM
3

Most interesting part in my opinion: BZ: Ein Paar liegt im Bett, sie will Sex. Er sagt, er sei zu müde. Sie gibt nicht auf und streichelt sein Geschlechtsteil, bis er doch Lust hat. Ist das künftig strafbar, weil sie sein Nein ignoriert hat? Hörnle: Das Verhalten der Frau mag zwar den Tatbestand des neuen Gesetzes erfüllen. Aber ich bitte Sie, welcher Mann zeigt seine Partnerin nach einer solchen Situation an? BZ: Unmittelbar danach tut er das sicher nicht. Aber vielleicht geht sie einen Monat s…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 08:50 PM
-6

In my opinion the male body has been more objectified than the female through all of (at least Western) history. I mean look at all those famous Western art which shows the male body fully nude and with great anatomic detail: "Laocoön and His Sons": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laoco%C3%B6n_and_His_Sons#/media/File:Laocoon_and_His_Sons.jpg Myron's "Discobolus": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discobolus#/media/File:Greek_statue_discus_thrower_2_century_aC.jpg Michelangelo's "David": https://en.wi…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 02:36 PM
4

Once in the car, she starts reading Jessica Valenti‘s Sex Object and starts crying I can relate to her.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 09:36 AM
3

Already? The video is from June 2014.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 08:26 AM
1

Well, ok. If she's talking about this kind of equality, then she's actually right. This kind is really called feminism. ;)
/r/MensRights02/08/16 07:57 PM
1

Which kind of equality? Equality before law? I would call you a humanist. Equal right to vote? I would call you a democrat. Equal opportunity? I would call you a classical liberal. Complete economic equality? I would call you a communist or a socialist.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 10:08 AM
2

Other things being equal, men's and women's life expectancy is fairly close; however, men's is normally slightly shorter because of their tendency to engage in more dangerous professions. Therefore, any place where women's life expectancy is lower than men's indicates a serious problem. And funnily enough the shown map doesn't even indicate countries where women have a lower life expectancy than men, because such countries (almost?) don't exist. It uses three categories. Yellow: Women live >8 ye…
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:58 AM
2

It's EU though. They don't hire the most qualified. In Germany we joke that if a political party wants to get rid of one of their high-ranked politicians because they are losing popularity, then they give them some important-sounding job in the EU, where they basically can do nothing and nobody asks for them anymore.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 06:55 AM
0

I would respect this article more if it covered the mens contribution to home making as well as their lack of employment. Or the men's alcohol consumption. I know a few wives who broke up with their workless husbands more because he was an alcoholic and less because he was workless. Don't even want to talk about other drugs.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:27 AM
3

I'm mostly only lurking in their sub, but I often agree with what they have say.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 06:31 PM
1

She wasn't convicted for murder though, she was "only" convicted for manslaughter and the state's attorney already said that he's going to appeal. Will see what the outcomeof that is going to be.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 11:08 PM
2

in Australia you don't even have to threaten or harass someone online to end up in jail, just offending them will do it. In Germany insulting someone is also a criminal offense and although I'm not really supporting it, I also don't find it all that wrong. Most of the time people have to pay fines of about 300 - 500€ and obviously most insults (I would estimate > 99.99%) go unreported.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 10:45 PM
1

Missing white woman syndrome
/r/MensRights27/07/16 03:47 AM
1

And that's just the tip of the iceberg! There is another legal principle called "Nulla poena sine lege" if we abolished it, we could jail so many more people.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:17 PM
1

Don't think that there would be an outrage. It's just a prank.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 11:17 PM
11

how are you to defend yourself? Well, you aren't. /s
/r/MensRights24/07/16 10:42 PM
1

I have to say even as an MRA I find this thread very lopsided towards discriminations men are facing.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 12:31 AM
0

This is a much more sane sentence for a case with no evidence than the 15+ years that the falsely convicted in the US receive. How much evidence there is shouldn't matter for the length of the sentence. Either the court is convinced beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty and gives him the full sentence or it isn't convinced and the accused has to go free. They can't say that they give him a shorter sentence because they aren't convinced enough of his guilt and are afraid to make a mi…
/r/MensRights23/07/16 12:36 AM
37

Nazis accuse jews of suppressing non-jews and they base this claim solely on the fact that jews earn more on average than non-jews. Feminists accuse men of suppressing women and they base this claim solely on the fact that men earn more on average than women.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 11:44 PM
2

In Germany we have this new law that basically has destroyed free-speech online. I'm German myself and I'm wondering which law you are talking about though. To my knowledge neither §130 "Incitement to Hatred" nor §185 "Insult" were changed recently.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 08:00 PM
1

I thought he were gaysplaining. /s
/r/MensRights20/07/16 04:09 PM
1

Damn Britain. I admired you for having the guts to leave the EU because of its shitty laws. Please don't ruin it now. /s
/r/MensRights19/07/16 04:56 PM
–

I'm not American, but I don't see a reason why problems by which mostly black men are impaired should not be discussed in this sub. Sometimes we also have links to Men's Rights issues which are specific to India for example and mostly don't exist in the West. I don't see a reason why they should be removed. Generally I trust the voting system which brings the best contributions to the top and if I can tell by the title that a contribution doesn't interest me, then I just don't click it. I don't …
/r/MensRights13/07/16 01:23 PM
3

Lucky dude, dodged that bullet.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 01:25 PM
-3

Weapon of suspect: 5% vehicle What kind of vehicles are those that they are considered weapons? Tanks?
/r/MensRights12/07/16 10:05 AM
0

I haven't heard about this doxing case before, but the second article was actually quite good.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 11:16 PM
6

It's time women say no and fight back or stop crying rape at every opportunity. I remember a few years ago I read an article where they had shown the movie "Raw Deal: A Question of Consent" to some students and asked them afterwards if they would consider that case "rape". Male students were actually more inclined to call it rape than female students. Obviously I don't know if this would still be the case today, but I still think that almost all women are as reluctant to call something rape as m…
/r/MensRights09/07/16 11:19 AM
2

Critics believe Germany has long lagged behind other developed nations when it comes to its rape laws, but will this fix the problem? I'm certainly not claiming that our rape law was perfect and I'm fine with it being changed, but at least it includes female perpetrators since 1997 unlike the English law or many US laws which exclude female perpetrators till today. In my opinion those laws are way more behind since they violate the essential human right principle of equality before the law.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:03 AM
7

as feminists, we have nothing to prove to men -- this movement is not for them. At last a statement I actually agree with. But it's a funny last sentence after such a long article explaining that feminism is almost entirely about changing certain male behaviours.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 07:37 PM
3

Problem is they already took away federal funding from police because they were not reporting enough murders. /s
/r/MensRights06/07/16 12:53 AM
30

In the articles I read before about that subject, this wasn't mentioned. Here I found a German article in which they seem to explain it: http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/justiz/gina-lisa-lohfink-wenn-der-gerichtssaal-zur-buehne-wird-a-1100098.html Staatsanwältin Corinna Gögge behauptet, die Ablehnung beziehe sich auf das Filmen. Es handele sich um einvernehmlichen Geschlechtsverkehr. Translation: Prosecutor Corinna Gögge claims, the refusal is only directed towards the filming. The intercourse is …
/r/MensRights05/07/16 10:20 PM
1

and male politicians as varied as Francois Hollande in France, Petro Poroshenko of Ukraine and Mexico's Enrique Pena Nieto are struggling with their poll ratings (...) Angela Merkel has been the most powerful person in Europe for almost a decade now; Merkel is also struggling with her poll ratings...
/r/MensRights05/07/16 09:45 PM
19

Read a little bit about it in German media. If I understood it correctly she claimed that she was given date rape drugs, but then there were several videos which showed that she was completely conscious.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 08:52 PM
2

she dumps her husband and child I thought she has no child.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 07:55 PM
4

I only did a quick google search but it seems that women were more likely to be in favor of leave: http://graphics.wsj.com/brexit-whos-voting-what/ Men were more likely to be in favor of remaining, but more women said they hadn't decided which way to vote.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 10:25 PM
3

Why don't we just ban alcohol? But alcohol is an essential part of our human existence. Can't we ban sex instead? /s
/r/MensRights02/07/16 09:42 PM
2

But feminists can no longer use the glass ceiling card anymore if some women are getting into those positions. lol, you must be new here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permanent_revolution
/r/MensRights01/07/16 04:13 PM
2

I've seen some victim blaming / rape apologist stiff posted on GMP before, but this has to be one of the worst. Let's look at what toxic masculinity is Is the article you linked not saying that it should be called rape what Alexandra Vera did and that it is wrong to call it a "relationship" instead as many media do? I don't agree with the article to call the reason "Toxic Masculinity", but I really wouldn't say that it is apoligizing rape, more of the opposite actually.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 10:47 AM
17

Why would you ask "Sweden’s national association of women’s shelters" anyway if you waned to open a clinic for male rape victims?
/r/MensRights28/06/16 10:06 AM
2

But the two contentions on which most of the publicity was based — that the clinic is the first in the world and that it was a new clinic Most of the articles she linked to don't claim this. https://archive.is/yIIDJ: The South General hospital already has a walk-in centre which provides urgent care for women who have been raped or sexually assaulted. But it announced on Wednesday that it would be admitting men and boys from October. https://archive.is/8Jnwi#selection-1743.1-1743.336: Södersjukhu…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 10:04 AM
2

It definitely wasn't right how you were discriminated like that. Or they tried to protect him. They also see how the world is today and know how dangerous it can be for a male teacher. They can't fix the world either, so they make the best out of it.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 09:49 AM
1

I highly doubt that she makes the world even better for rich white girls.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 02:24 PM
1

Besides falling behind women academically, men are working dramatically less in the twenty-first century than in previous centuries. And still way more than women...
/r/MensRights25/06/16 12:54 AM
3

she put his penis in her anyways raped him, and he had to pull it back out FTFY
/r/MensRights23/06/16 09:26 AM
3

Point 6 sounds dangerous. If you're alone, you have no alibi.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 10:53 AM
2

So what? It's not like they are violating the rights of other people with those actions.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 10:56 PM
1

But those were male!!!!! That's no problem. /s
/r/MensRights18/06/16 09:33 PM
1

Why is that a girl in the picture though and not a boy? Isn't that "problematic"? /s
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:53 PM
1

Ah, I see. Just remembered that I read somewhere that mentally ill people were not allowed to buy guns, which then seems to be at least partially right. Thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 12:42 AM
1

I'm not American, but do you not also need a note from a doctor that you're not mentally ill?
/r/MensRights16/06/16 09:54 PM
1

I'm agreeing with an article published by "The Sun"? Damn, I'm getting old.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 01:55 PM
1

44 men, 5 women if I didn't miscount.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:14 PM
3

Don't know this show, but seems more like a show for conservative women and not for feminists. The type of women who don't want equality as much and are therefore also fine being catcalled, objectified or expected to do chores. I'm not sharing their views, but at least they don't tend to be hypocrites.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:59 PM
4

I'm not so much concerned about those teenagers. 10 years back when I was a teenager we had a lot of so called "Emos" at school. They were very similiar: fragile and seemingly unable to live. And now this subculture seems entirely extinct and the people who were part of it have grown up to normal people. I guess that the same will happen with these teenagers.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:32 PM
1

Brock Allen Turner, 20, was found guilty of raping 23-year-old at a frat party I thought he wasn't. Wikipedia says: The two formal charges of rape under California state law were dropped at the preliminary hearing, but Turner was convicted of three other counts of felony sexual assault, which he committed when he was 19. Could someone explain me?
/r/MensRights08/06/16 02:38 PM
6

If you think violence against women is a big problem. It is, but violence against men is a bigger problem as your own statistics show: http://www.aic.gov.au/statistics/homicide/victims.html http://www.aic.gov.au/statistics/violent%20crime/assault.html
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:36 AM
2

Agree, death to chivalry, long live gender-blind courtesy.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 12:07 PM
1

I'm not denying that those acts meet the legal definition of rape. If it meets the legal definition of rape, then I really don't see intellectual dishonesty to call it "rape"?
/r/MensRights05/06/16 04:07 AM
2

What's going on with this baby's eyes in the last picture?
/r/MensRights03/06/16 09:53 PM
8

I seldom read such a disgusting article before. Here the same guy writes that Black Americans and native Australians should get a discount because they already make up such a high proportion of inmates: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/05/indigenous-australians-and-african-americans-deserve-a-sentencing-discount And now he writes that women should get a discount because they make up such a low proportion of inmates. What a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 10:45 PM
19

Title IX — the federal gender equality law under which most college sexual assault cases are considered — was created to protect women from discrimination. University Title IX offices infrequently face cases of alleged female-on-male sexual assault, which experts said means there are few, if any, precedents for how to investigate a case like Rose’s. Title IX was not set up to deal with a reverse in gender. Huh? I thought Title IX was deliberatly created gender-neutral and to protect students of …
/r/MensRights30/05/16 08:14 PM
2

"claims all men are rapists ... debunked" I'm shocked that people even feel the need to debunk such an obvious BS.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 06:03 PM
1

Hehe, the grass is always greener, as they say.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 10:08 PM
2

That's why they legalized gay marriage. Gay is the new conservative. ;)
/r/MensRights29/05/16 01:37 PM
3

"I am dumb enough to vote for a woman ... Are you? #DumbEnough4Hillary" /s
/r/MensRights28/05/16 01:08 PM
2

Secondly even when used as a judgemental insult, its usually aimed at an individual based on actions and behaviors, not an entire gender. Not that I condone that, I don't, but I meantion it in the name of accuracy. I agree. The terms "wanker", "tosser", "dick" or "jerk" are very gendered towards men, but are people who use them therefore misandrist? I don't think so. They only want to insult this one man against who they are using the word and not all men.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:24 AM
1

They are denying male Syrian refugees asylum, because womynz are the main victim according to them, despite the fact that about 80% of the people who died in Syria were men. Are you really expecting anything more from this government?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 08:25 AM
5

After being brought up a fundamentalist Christian, I rejected the concept that men were better than me because they had a dick. If she was raised in that belief, I can understand that she became a feminist. In my book, rejecting this concept doesn't make you a "radical feminist", it doesn't even make you a normal feminist, it's just an obviousness.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 02:24 PM
10

Because she's an empowered woman. D'oh!
/r/MensRights11/05/16 10:58 PM
5

Students who join Harvard's male-only social clubs won't be able to serve as sports captains or leaders of other campus groups starting in fall 2017. Not be able to serve as sports captains? Are sports teams not also gender seperated?
/r/MensRights07/05/16 01:26 PM
1

DIE CIS SCUM!!! ;)
/r/MensRights03/05/16 05:42 PM
1

Or that it is concerning that the number of women among homeless people rose from 20% to 25%...
/r/MensRights23/04/16 09:31 AM
4

Na, he's using Tinder for debates and reddit to hook up.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 12:54 AM
13

Would be interesting to know if the same is also true for boys. When I was in my teenage years, I was also more shy and thought more about my appeal on others when girls were around and I preferred all-male groups. I had more fun there and flourished more.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 01:49 PM
1

Not so sure if this has even to do with Islam. I mean when we talk about Christianity in the "Western world", we talk about a very secularized form of Christianity, in Europe even more than in the US. It's my impression that Christianity in Africa or South America is much more similiar to the Middle Eastern Islam than to our Western Christianity. And Islam in Syria, where most of the refugees in Germany come from, seems to be very secularized compared to Iran, Saudi-Arabia, Pakistan or Afghanist…
/r/MensRights09/04/16 10:52 AM
37

Even if it were true, I couldn't see any reason why they exclude men from this program. It's not like men would take anything away from women. I would assume that they don't care about the few cents a needle costs and they already give needles to men at other offices as mentioned in the text. This is just blatant sexism.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 05:13 PM
8

Hope we'll have artificial wombs soon, then this whole conflict of interest could be solved so easily - women wouldn't be forced to pregnancy without having to kill the fetus.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 02:02 AM
2

In public parking garages nothing can happen, only if you park on a parking lot for disabled people without being disabled.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 09:54 AM
3

The first of the two measures, which would authorize the National Science Foundation to use its entrepreneurial programs to recruit women, passed 383-4. I don't understand this. Are they currently only authorized to recruit men and the law will change it so that they are authorized to recruit both, men and women? I would support that, since I would find the current situation sexist then.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 02:54 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqmthnrG-2A
/r/MensRights21/03/16 05:00 PM
1

In terms of actual average programming ability however things probably went backwards. I would say that the job of programmers changed to such an extent that you can't even compare it anymore. Like you can't compare a Spitfire pilot in WW2 to a modern F-16 pilot. The Spitfire pilot flew by sight and had to aim manually with his machine gun. A F-16 pilot has to know his computers and instruments and his rockets automatically find their targets, but he also flies at much higher speed. Who is the b…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 03:28 AM
1

So is alcohol...
/r/MensRights20/03/16 08:50 AM
2

"their door" No pun intended.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 03:13 PM
1

With the upcoming referendum on the Brexit, the EU would do pretty much everything to get some votes against it.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 01:01 PM
2

Joel Spolsky, one of founders of StackOverflow, wrote about his ideas on customer service on his blog: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/customerservice.html He thinks that the company can never win the fight against unsatisfied customers and should always take the blame.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 12:45 PM
1

She is right though that this survey says little about the average developer as it suggests. It only says something about the average registered StackOverflow user who is willing to answer surveys.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 12:22 PM
3

According to the tweet they have 4 women.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:11 PM
1

Might have been sped up by the Cologne assaults but this is already discussed longer as part of the Istanbul Convention. I remember reading articles in German newspapers last year where they discussed changing the law. And I actually support a change in the German rape law. I'm against "Yes means Yes" but the current law doesn't even implement a "No means No" standard.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 10:04 AM
173

He was a cop on duty who had sex with a woman in a squad car. Even if he didn't rape her, he certainly miserably failed his job as a cop and deserves some shaming.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:55 AM
1

Not a good idea, but as long as their adults, its they're business. Depends on the country.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 09:08 AM
18

Thought it were faked. Tried it out myself. It's real.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 12:56 AM
2

But also the others I'd say. The fifth and sixth picture show the same guy. If you click on "Load more", you see more pictures of men reading the book "Hot dudes reading" or multiple pictures of the same guy. Some are clearly posed, so I'd assume that the others are too.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 12:23 AM
2

but because they're clearly taking photos without their knowledge. Well, the photos from the linked site are obviously posed. Or are those only examples?
/r/MensRights12/03/16 10:45 PM
2

lol Is this picture with this man and this woman with a fricking metal pole between them really meant to showcase manspreading?
/r/MensRights10/03/16 08:37 PM
1

If it was like that, I agree with you of course. I just mean generally. I've seen pictures of "manspreading" where more than half of the seats were empty and I find that ridiculous. Why should you not sit comfortable, when everybody else could too? Those are just people who look for a reason to complain. But during rush hour, I agree that it is rude. Or on subway stations I have put my coffee cup on a seat beside even during rush hour, but that was because almost all other people preferred stand…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 08:05 PM
12

This year, I was fortunate enough to chair two sessions, the first with author Jennifer Clement on her novel Prayers For The Stolen, a look at how Mexico's drug trade targets women, namely those "stolen" and trafficked into sex slavery. Because it means men are still not listening when women speak about our experiences in a world dominated by men and male violence. Australian women speaking about Mexican women, who are victims of sex trafficking. That's not exactly women speaking about "their" e…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 07:32 PM
2

If other people have to stand because of that, then it's rude. If there is more than enough place for everybody, I don't see the problem with people taking up more than one seat.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 08:20 AM
5

It has emerged that the government did not write to any women affected by the rise in the pension age for nearly 14 years after the law was passed in 1995. Since when does the government write to you when they change a law which affects you?
/r/MensRights10/03/16 07:54 AM
2

Ethically speaking, it is wrong of us as a society to force responsibility onto the unwilling. I'm not disagreeing with you. But if the society doesn't force the father into the financial responsibility and the mother doesn't earn enough to raise the kid by herself, then she will get public welfare - taxpayer's money - and so all taxpayers will be forced into financial responsibilty for a child whom they have nothing to do with, just because the father isn't willing to pay. Like I said not disag…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 11:15 PM
2

you end up with an extremely flooded job market Is it?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 03:45 AM
1

I don't know if those companies have around 50% female employees, but I agree that this site is completly stupid. It just gives some random meaningless figures about female employees without comparing it in any way to the male employees.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 03:42 AM
1

Although they added an "exact" and then linked an article which only says "Women even paid less for same work" and later "similar jobs with similar qualification", not "exact same work".
/r/MensRights06/03/16 05:54 PM
2

When an article uses such an awful distracting gif, you know it's not worth reading.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 03:50 PM
2

Is this about those taxes? http://www1.nyc.gov/nyc-resources/service/2389/sales-tax I mean how much VAT on what is always arbitrary, but I would not call them "medical necessary". They are of course necessary like razors and foam are necessary for men and which are also not VAT-free I'd assume, but not "medical". What this really shows is that if they make such a big deal about those taxes, they have no real problems anymore.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 07:41 PM
17

Is the sexism not that there was only one man?
/r/MensRights03/03/16 11:09 PM
3

while female ones will more often be redeemed or excused Except in kids movies remarkably. There both the protagonist and main villain seems to be mostly female: Snow White, Wizard of Oz, Alice in Wonderland, Arielle, ...
/r/MensRights03/03/16 09:23 PM
6

It definitely is. Here a large pdf (2.5 MB) of a study regarding violence against women in the EU: http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2014-vaw-survey-main-results-apr14_en.pdf Page 40 breaks down what kinds of violence women have been facing and page 123 breaks down what kinds of violence girls under 15 have been facing. I would definitely say that men and boys are facing much more non-sexual violence as described there, but couldn't find a study regarding this. For example "only" 22% …
/r/MensRights02/03/16 06:21 PM
15

I find those articles so disgusting. Less than 10% of the people sitting in prison are women and they still manage to make primarily an injustice against women out of it. There is really no compassion for men in this world. People just don't care about male suffering. VOMIT!
/r/MensRights02/03/16 03:30 PM
1

It would definitely be investigated by the police and depending on this investigation they would decide if they press charges.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 04:56 PM
54

looks like he told them this at the hospital after the drugs tests so maybe they take issue with the fact he didn't rat her out earlier. But authorities still knew it way earlier: the mother admitted to Health Officials in September that she had smoked methamphetamine in her second trimester of pregnancy. Question stands: What could he have done differently to hinder her from taking drugs?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:51 PM
4

Sturdivant is charged with Felony Exposure of Drugs to a Child, Wow, didn't even know that there is such a thing. Does it also make otherwise legal drugs like alcohol or tobacco illegal during pregnancy?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:29 PM
2

pre-kindergarten? Shouldn't it be either pre-school or just kindergarten?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:01 PM
1

Considering that he tried to be "as ludicrous as possible", he sounds way more sane than most SJWs. I have to admit that his review of Warmachine also made me interested in this game, which I didn't know before. Edit: Misunderstood parts of the article.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 07:07 PM
1

men afraid of enraging their mates As adults they should be able to stand their ground. Don't treat them like children.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 05:52 PM
1

Good read: https://np.reddit.com/r/FeMRADebates/comments/1voxgf/toxic_masculinity_came_from_mens_activists_not/
/r/MensRights29/02/16 03:59 PM
3

Betty Mahmoody's For the Love of a child?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 06:46 AM
1

It's essentially the same thing as men not being allowed to sit next to women if the flight was say a muslim carrier. I agree, but that's why I'm happy that I don't live in any of those Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia and I would hope that we don't become like them.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 06:33 AM
1

Then I would assume that you could sue them. But you might first want to try to just use this room and see if you get thrown out. Maybe it's designated as a women's room but not actually enforced, not sure if it's illegal then.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 05:16 AM
1

Is it a restroom or changing room?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 04:04 AM
3

A guy gave her a compliment she didn't appreciate and was fired the next day. Do you really find such a behavior appropriate at the workplace?
/r/MensRights28/02/16 06:18 AM
3

A judge who makes rulings because he's pissed has failed his job. He's a representative of the state and if he can't keep his feelings out and makes a personal feud out of it, then he should look for another job.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 03:02 AM
1

Or: College professors are not trained properly in how to hold a fair trial. In other news, programmers don't know how to run a farm.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 12:58 AM
3

And now you know why the US have the highest incarceration rate in the world...
/r/MensRights26/02/16 11:23 PM
2

I can think of a few more reasons: Revenge on an ex who left her Winning a custody lawsuit Boyfriend finds out that she cheated and she needs an excuse She needs him out of the way for some reason (e.g. they are competing for the same promotion) The reasons serial killers, arsonists or rapists have for their deeds are much more of an enigma to me. Those people just seem crazy to me (and probably are).
/r/MensRights25/02/16 08:29 AM
2

In 2009, the proportion of American women who were married dropped below 50 percent. In other words, for the first time in American history, single women (including those who were never married, widowed, divorced, or separated) outnumbered married women. I would assume that this also means that for the first time in American history single men outnumbered married men.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:43 AM
9

Assuming you only mean as men over women in Christian/Jewish/Atheist Western society, I could see the following to be considered as male privileges (excluding biological "privileges"): Men are more often the protagonists in works of art and have therefore somebody to identify with. You feel more included by generic masculine pronouns in many languages. Society tries less to victimize, protect, patronize and alarm you. In at least some (most?) subcultures, you're less judged by your looks, sleepi…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 11:31 AM
3

Men like him
/r/MensRights24/02/16 03:07 AM
3

Is this legal?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 12:10 AM
5

I've only watched parts of the first season of GoT and it really wasn't for me, but from what I've seen the whole series seems to be an orgy of violence against men and women, isn't it?
/r/MensRights22/02/16 04:42 PM
3

Why did they replace sex with s3x and Blowjob with Bl - smiley - wjob? Are there really people who feel insulted by sex but are fine with s3x? Or is there an other reason I can't think of?
/r/MensRights21/02/16 10:00 PM
2

Social security insurances are a little bit special, but insurances generally short change the person insured, else they wouldn't work. I mean the insurance company has to pay administration cost too. The purpose of insurances is risk mitigation for the price of so called opportunity costs. For example if you make a fire insurance for your house, the company assumes a risk of let's say 0.1% for your house to burn down in any year. Then they estimate the value of your house (let's say 100,000$) a…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:13 PM
1

US and Canada might have similiar GDP per capita but in Canada this whealth tends to be distributed more equally while in the US there are bigger differences between the richest and the poorest. Brazil or Mexico have even higher homicide rates than the US and also higher inequality. Here is a picture of the Gini-Coefficient which tries to measure inequality: http://imgur.com/ZA27Ntc Not saying that this is the only reason, but I think that it's more of a reason than gun control laws.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 04:59 PM
2

I would also say that you are bit harsh with her. I mean she deleted her comment, because she probably figured out that she said something stupid in anger. This happens to everybody from time to time. I would also try to not be too zealous here. ;)
/r/MensRights20/02/16 11:31 PM
2

Until his death in 2008, Jörg Haider was the openly gay leader of Austria’s Freedom Party. Jörg Haider wasn't openly gay. There were rumors, but he was married with kids. I'd guess they mean Pim Fortuyn, a gay Dutch conservative, who was murdered 2002.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 06:24 PM
-1

Poe's law strikes again. Did she just forgot the "/s" or is she really serious? I just can't tell.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 01:31 PM
2

Consent can of course be given preemptively IMHO. Like one time "I'd love to be woken up by a BJ tomorrow" or forever "I love to be woken up by BJs and you can do it as often as you want.". But doing it to your SO without ever talking about it before I consider rape too. "No means No" is only if both are conscious for me.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 10:19 AM
2

Looks just like a random medieval European knight to me. I assume because the article talks about chivalry which is derived from the french word for knight (chevalier).
/r/MensRights19/02/16 01:04 AM
1

Would he also have asked a man if he liked a ride?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 06:45 PM
2

I mean you could vote for Hillary, but #WouldThatEndRacism?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 01:49 PM
2

Much of these changes are going to hurt women in their 50s, 60s and 70s. I would actually agree that a divorce should follow the laws which were in place when the marriage was contracted since both partners agreed to marry under those laws. If you don't want the current laws as part of your marriage, you should make prenuptial agreement. And people in their 50s, 60s and 70s married in a time when gender roles were more traditional and split duties between couples were more common. They couldn't …
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:01 AM
5

What a disgusting homophobic article.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 08:19 PM
1

Sometimes a step back is a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 01:44 PM
2

I think we should start calling all people who don't support Sanders anti-semites. /s
/r/MensRights16/02/16 01:16 PM
11

Definitely something which could help improve the two main issues men and women are facing IMHO: More representation and wage for women More humane society for men, in which they are not considered as disposable and their value and dignity is not defined by success in their job
/r/MensRights15/02/16 03:33 PM
3

I would buy it. /s
/r/MensRights15/02/16 06:01 AM
0

Maybe transsexuals spend $10000 on average. /s
/r/MensRights14/02/16 02:32 PM
1

I only see the wage gap cited Dude, don't forget the other even worse injustice women are facing: Tampon VAT! /s (Women who complain about ridiculous things like 5% tampon VAT only prove that they don't any real problems anymore, especially when the razor VAT is 20% at the same time)
/r/MensRights14/02/16 09:33 AM
355

That women uniquely risk death and long-term health problems to bear society’s children 600 women die each year due to birth complications in the US. 4500 people die each year due to workplace accidents. More than 90% of them are men. I would rather stand three times with a shield in battle than give birth once. Since nobody forces you to give birth there are good news for you: You can!
/r/MensRights13/02/16 04:30 PM
1

As the article says: The researchers admit that they expected to find that women's pull requests were accepted less often. So they made a first analsysis which showed that women have an acceptance rate of 78% while men have an acceptance rate of 74%, which "shocked" them since it didn't prove their hypothesis. (Article sounds to me that if they had found out the opposite, they would have stopped there and consider their hypothesis as proven.) Then they made a second analysis: Maybe women just ma…
/r/MensRights13/02/16 10:49 AM
1

But it seems to be only the mods there. At least the most upvoted comments in the linked thread are very reasonable.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 08:40 PM
1

I'm sure that public service is leading by example. They would not expect private companies to unfold data which they keep secret themselves, would they? /s
/r/MensRights12/02/16 12:30 PM
-1

Mandatory Link: https://xkcd.com/882/
/r/MensRights12/02/16 09:28 AM
3

No matter what the explanation—and it's likely some combination—we have further evidence that there is measurable bias against women in computer science. I can't help myself, but it seems to me that this would have been the conclusion no matter what the data had shown.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:56 AM
3

Article sounds more as if they simply wanted to make the current non-compulsory sex education compulsory instead. Don't see a problem with that.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 04:35 AM
10

Is it not pretty easy? If somebody claims that they was raped, the police should believe them to the same extent they would believe somebody who claims that they was robbed, battered or stolen from, not more, not less.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 11:02 AM
4

I think it's obvious what they are protesting against: Patriarchy(TM) (If you ask me to define it, you are a misogynist)!
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:51 AM
15

That's the joke! In many occupations (bank, insurance company, consulting, ...) men are forced to wear a suit with long sleeves and ties in midsummer and in winter, while women can adjust their clothing to the temperature and then they still complain about sexism if men regulate the aircon colder than women need. If I could wear shorts and shirts with short sleeves like women can wear short skirts and blouses with short sleeves, I would also have no problem with 77 F.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:19 AM
3

"I believe that women deserve better questioning when it comes to whether or not consent was obtained. I don't think we need to use these tactics, I think there's room for a full and fair defence, but I also think that there's room for respecting women's bodies." I disrespect women's bodies when I question them???
/r/MensRights10/02/16 10:56 PM
11

Modern Art, Rock music, Comics, Pen and Paper RPGs, Heavy Metal music, Hip Hop music, video games,... Who will they blame next for causing violence?
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:48 PM
4

It's definitely true both ways. Let me put it like this: For all the great things the internet gave to us, it also had its downsides.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:44 PM
2

So what does she want to say? Black people are more criminal because of how they are socialized (which is also my conviction) or black people are more criminal because of genetics?
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:25 PM
36

Apply "yes means yes" to other scenarios: You go to a supermarket, you put the products you want to buy on the conveyor belt, the cashier registers them and takes your money. => Theft, because they never verbally agreed to make a purchase contract with you. Somebody rings on your door, you open it, he enters without invitation but you also don't object or try to throw him out. => Trespass, because you never allowed him to enter. And even if they say "yes" it wouldn't mean anything, because this …
/r/MensRights10/02/16 12:56 AM
2

I guess it depends on the sex of the accuser and the accused. /s
/r/MensRights09/02/16 11:25 PM
1

On the one hand, it makes sense to tailor programs to people's needs and though I'm unconvinced that 28% of the homeless population is women I suspect it's more like 10%, I'm not against a program specifically targeting women. The terms "homeless" and "rough sleepers" don't mean the same as I found out. Among "rough sleepers" the male percentage is higher afaik.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 04:42 AM
4

And if you don't want to be shot by a policeman then don't run with a raised knife towards him while screaming "I'm going to murder you, you fucking pig!!!" Who could have thought so? /s
/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:44 PM
3

professional psychologists Maybe a psychiatrist instead?
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:57 AM
3

In his book, Birger eloquently explains, in terms that even the non-statistically-literate can comprehend, that the gender ratios of college graduating classes in the past few decades reveal that there really aren’t enough single guys. It's a book written for women, right? SCNR
/r/MensRights07/02/16 08:59 PM
14

We were made [...] not to kill and destroy!!! Guess what: neither were men. But if we were able to learn how to become emotionless murder machines, so will you.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 12:47 PM
3

I have literally never heard of any of those movies Thanks, but I know that I'm old. The Office Didn't they have this running gag "That's what she said." and an episode called "Sexual Harassement". However, I do believe some things shouldnt be joked about and rape is one of them because it is a very real threat to women. To me the purpose of black comedy is exactly to make those things less theatening. War, battery, murder, robbery, terrorism or torture are also very threatening and they won't c…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 12:04 PM
6

Just because feminists have made rape jokes, doesnt mean it is okay. Some black people make black jokes but does that mean that every black person is okay with those jokes? Does that make those jokes any less racist? Does that mean you condemn black humor in general? So you don't watch movies which make jokes about dark themes like war, battery, murder, rape or torture? No "Hot Shots", no "Life of Brian", no "Dr. Strangelove"?
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:08 AM
6

There is no significant difference in the IQ of women or men. This is true by definition. IQ tests are calibrated in a way that there is no difference. There are areas in which women score better on average and areas in which men score better on average and those areas are weighted so that both sexes get an IQ of 100 on average. If an IQ test would measure a higher IQ for one sex, it wouldn't mean that this sex has a higher IQ. It would only mean that the IQ test isn't calibrated correctly. http…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 08:38 AM
8

I thought an AMA with a typical feminist The fact that you are willing to discuss in this subreddit means that you're not a typical feminist in my book. (If I say that it's meant as a compliment in case you're wondering) ;) Jokes aside: I think it's great you're doing that.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 07:45 AM
8

"People aren't allowed to change their minds or regret their decisions?" Wondering that too. Could she not just withdraw the consent for all sex they had in their relationship and charge him with rape. /s
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:29 PM
1

Exactly, and that's what investigations are for, to find out if it happened.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:11 PM
6

I even heard that there are sex workers who sell themselves for the rest of their life to a single man and vow him exclusive access to their vaginas in trade for life-long alimony. They call it "marriage". /s
/r/MensRights06/02/16 10:50 PM
2

Show me where in the article Stewart-Binks was made out to be a victim. She calls her first victim: Did Stewart-Binks feel pressured to take part? Did she know how far Gronkowski would take it? Or was she really OK with this? I really hope not. And then she starts slut-shaming her, because obviously she cannot stand sluts and seems to be very prude.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:19 AM
0

He wasn't charged with rape. Swedish police was still investigating and only wanted to question him, but he flew. This sounds like a crime to me: When she woke, he was inside her. She asked: “Are you wearing anything?” He replied: “You.”
/r/MensRights05/02/16 11:21 PM
4

That's horrible! I'm feeling really sorry for you. Fortunately for me, life was very kind to me and I actually never encountered such outrageous injustices men are facing myself, but I really hope that such a thing will one day be called what it is: rape.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 04:01 PM
6

I guess a couple of years ago, once I got over the fear of being called a bad person for supporting male issues. Oh, then you are a step further than I. I'm admittedly just a "keyboard MRA" coward. I never called myself a MRA irl, too much fear that I might face bad consequences if I do.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 03:51 PM
5

Especially funny that this sentence is directly after: If someone tells you that they are offended by something... just believe them. Sounds like white men are not included into "someone".
/r/MensRights02/02/16 12:00 PM
1

It's quiet possible that it is true. I just don't think that somebody with the aspiration of making serious science would use the Darwin Awards as a proof for his claim. I think it's more meant as lighthearted entertainment than as science.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 08:14 PM
1

Do they have another price list for the healthy food or is that really all they are selling?
/r/MensRights01/02/16 06:47 PM
2

There are more men than women with low intelligence. And for the past 20 years, 318 Darwin Awards have recognized people who removed themselves from the gene pool through “idiotic behaviors”—like the terrorist who mailed a letter bomb without enough postage, and when it was returned to sender, opened it. It turns out that more than 88% of the Darwin winners were male. Doesn't sound to me as it is meant as "science".
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:12 AM
2

I'm just really frustrated. This sub and many like it are basically disenfranchising many from joining for years it seems now. Yeah, those comments here really made me rethink if I'm in the right subreddit.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 09:09 AM
3

34 upvotes? That hurts.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 08:46 AM
3

Society views men struggling with depression with compassion and understanding, while men view their problems in a very negative light, according to a new study from UBC, funded by the Movember Foundation. Would be interesting to know how much those findings are applicable to other countries than Canada. In Germany depressions are stigmatizing from my personal impression (no science to back it up though).
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:45 AM
3

Oh, you're right. Didn't notice that honestly and read "the article" for some reason. My fault. Sorry for that.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:18 AM
3

Not really: But the authors emphasize that the increase in wars on a queen’s watch is not likely explained by an attempt by the female leaders to signal their strength. Were that true, you’d expect a spike in war participation earlier in the queens’ careers, and that wasn’t the case according to the data analyzed here. Dube and Harish also argue that the queens were not actively seeking to fight more wars.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 08:48 AM
1

Yeah, that sounds really horrible. Not because some PUAs are mocking him, but because of that poor "fat chick", he's only dating because he had "no other options". Fat people are humans with feelings too and they deserve to be treated like that and have somebody who is honest with them. If OP doesn't see it like that he's one of those "far-right parts of the manosphere" himself and might prefer to go to TRP.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 08:20 AM
12

I think nobody makes that conclusion. It's just a refreshing article in a world where you constantly hear that without men there would be no wars or crimes, because women are the better humans and if women commit crimes it is not their fault, it is society's or their partner's fault. I would be happy if the conclusion were "men only slightly more violent than women".
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:36 PM
0

Wow, I didn't even know that there is such a thing as "female comedians". /s
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:46 AM
12

No, men are not 'misunderstanding' the feminist agenda. It's similiar to communism I would say. Many people don't judge communism by Karl Marx' ideas, some of which were certainly great, they judge it by Stalin's and Mao's deeds - the homicidal and totalitarian regimes it created. You cannot blame them for that, deeds count more than warm words.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:19 AM
1

I love death metal and would check this band out if they weren't coming from that place of hatred against men. Now I'll just class them with the racist/Nazi/bigoted metal bands who I don't care to listen to. The interview sounds more to me like the interviewer tries to brand them like that than they themselves.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:42 AM
32

It is our time to have wage equality once and for all Which would mean that all Hollywood actors should earn about 99% less from their current earning.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:11 AM
5

Is misogyny actually common? My understanding from the comments is that the "gore" stuff is usually targeted at both men and women, and is therefore rather egalitarian. Depends on the band. AxCx and GUT are more misogynistic and homophobic I would say, but I even heard people calling Manowar misogynistic because 2 of their songs are misogynistic. At the same time about 100 of their songs are about slaughtering and mutilating their male enemies and nobody cared ...
/r/MensRights27/01/16 09:35 PM
3

If someone has a problem with our lyrics and samples, they should frown equally upon misogynistic themes. Agreed. And if someone has a problem with misogynistic themes, they should also frown equally upon theirs. I have a problem with neither.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 09:10 PM
5

You support your child because it is your child, not because it is your daughter. If you had a son instead, you would support him as much as you support her.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 04:52 PM
1

German newspapers call it a "security point" and not a "safe space". As I understand it this won't mean that there will be public areas from which men will be banned. Only that there will be a police post which is meant especially for straitened women, although I would assume that they won't turn down a man either. I'm fine with that.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:37 PM
4

You mean BIG SISTER.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 07:49 AM
1

Linked it mainly because I find it funny. ;)
/r/MensRights27/01/16 05:06 AM
2

Women also can urinate standing up: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2387892/Would-use-urinal-WOMEN-Portable-funnel-sellout-Groupon-hikers-campers-road-trippers.html
/r/MensRights26/01/16 05:18 PM
5

It's perpetuated by comparing ALL Women's incomes to all Men's incomes. Most statistics I know only compare women who have an income to men who have an income. Homeless people, the most disadvanteged group and more men, are no factor at all, because our society has more or less abandonned forgotten them.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 05:00 PM
2

Thank you. Didn't know that. In india and israel the law does still seem gender bias against men... Definitely, the British and the American also seem very gender biased against men to me. I think I like our German rape law as one of the best there. It currently requires that the victims physically defend themselves, which I don't like - a verbal No should be enough - but it's definitely very gender-neutral.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:31 PM
1

I mentioned how feminism pressured Israel and I think India into having gendered rape laws Could you post a link?
/r/MensRights26/01/16 08:26 AM
1

Should the graphic not say "Sex" instead of "Gender"?
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:38 AM
8

It's this sick society which ruins lives just because you make an off-colored joke or something. Everything is public nowadays and there is nothing you can do to protect yourself from a shitstorm, even if nobody knew you before. I'm not disagreeing with you but in a normal society like 10 years ago she couldn't have ruined lives like that because nobody would have cared.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 09:40 AM
6

I'm not laughing at feminist research: it's as open-ended, empirical, and undogmatic as Catholic theology. /s
/r/MensRights25/01/16 03:33 AM
2

And women are better students than they are workers. The skill sets required in school also tend to be more woman-friendly than the skill sets required in the work world. That's at least my impression.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 03:02 AM
2

Might be a cultural difference. In Germany we have laws which allow women to take much longer maternity leaves, so that they don't have breast milk left when they start working again. It just seems strange and a little bit disgusting to me that women keep their breast milk in the collective office fridge where others keep their breakfasts.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 02:53 AM
1

the breast milk I had stored in the office fridge What's going on in this office?
/r/MensRights25/01/16 12:42 AM
3

You can reject whomever you want based on whichever criteria you want. Nobody is entitled to have sex or a relationship with you. You don't need to justify by any means why you are attracted to some people but not to others. It's the most private part of your life. You are a mormon yourself and you want your partner to be a mormon too, that's your right. You're not into black, chubby, disabled, or promiscous people, that's your right.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 09:51 PM
1

If a Dean were to make a statement on a University telling women that it's the alcohols fault and not the men's for a rash of sexual assaults on campus, there would be an outcry about how men just shouldn't rape. Yet, here we are with the same exact scenario and there's absolute silence from feminists. Playing devil's advocate: Maybe they believe that they might still be able to change the opinion of a dean of an American or European university, based on the fact that they still have common mora…
/r/MensRights24/01/16 09:03 AM
4

I'm certainly not a "lurking feminist" just another "sarcastic and rhetorical imbecile" and I find the statement of this group atrocious, especially this: The group accused the women of being responsible for their own attacks But what I actually agree with them is that alcohol is one of the most dangerous drugs, which makes people violence-prone and easily to be provoked. A considerable amount of violent crimes (depending on the exact crime 33 - 50 %) are commited under the influence. I'm not ca…
/r/MensRights24/01/16 04:38 AM
1

Didn't know about that subreddit, but from what I've seen they actually seem reasonable.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 02:21 PM
52

Definitely. Especially because it sounds more like a statement from an extremely conservative politican who uses those concerns as an excuse when his true reasons are that the NSA might not be able to spy on those devices anymore. Full-disk encrypted OS mostly helps users to protect their data from others and doesn't help the criminals.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 02:05 PM
11

Where do you live that men can't adopt their wife's name?
/r/MensRights22/01/16 09:20 PM
2

How nice of them. So they really care about all the injustice men are facing today. /s
/r/MensRights22/01/16 04:25 AM
4

I definitely also don't see myself as a biologist. I think that nurture is far more importent for our personalities than nature. What I just don't like about Gender Studies is that many of its supporters (my impression, so take it with a grain of salt) tend to explain men's disadvantages with nature themselves: Mothers more often get custody: That's because mothers are more importent than fathers by nature. Men are more often incarcerated, murder victims and war victims: That's because men are m…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:03 AM
1

Except for feminists themselves I know pretty much nobody who sees feminism as an egalitarian movement, more as a hypocrite movement. Communism and Socialism are seen as egalitarian movements even among most of their enemies I would say, but not Feminism.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 08:41 AM
2

Equality is almost universally accepted as the definition of feminism. Which universe?
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:22 AM
2

Wait! When do you post on reddit?
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:17 AM
2

But how does it say in the graphic: "Innocence of ideological complicity" ;) Don't get me wrong, I also think that there is a huge difference between MRM and PUA, but that's because we are both part of the movement. And if you are part of a movement you subdivide it more than if you are not. For a Christian there are huge differences between Catholic, Protestant or Eastern Orthodox. For a non-Christian they are probably all the same more or less. For a Muslim there are huge differences between S…
/r/MensRights20/01/16 01:52 AM
34

Good graphic IMHO. Both to evaluate feminsim but also the Men's Rights Movement. And I think as it currently stands the MRM is much less of a hate movement than feminsim, that's why I support it. Though we should constantly check ourselves and strive to become better.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 12:59 AM
2

Sorry for being off-topic, but does anyboby know why I get a "403 - Forbidden" while trying to access Breitbart.com from Germany? If I use an US proxy it's working fine. Do other Germans have the same problem?
/r/MensRights18/01/16 07:28 PM
2

Yeah, I know: Falklandwar; Deindustrialization; Privatization of the telecommunication, railways and mail (I think); less public welfare; further escalation of the North Ireland conflict; and so on Or how a feminist would say: It's just because she was a woman and you are a misogynist. But for her it's at least debatable IMHO.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 11:47 AM
18

From Queen Elizabeth I – famous for her fiery temper – to Margaret Thatcher and her habit of “handbagging” those who annoyed her, many great leaders have had a tendency towards bullying behaviour. Queen Elizabeth? Great Leader? She was lucky to be born into the right family, that's all.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:03 PM
0

Sounds to me as if she means "a man" only in the sense of "a romantic partner" and I'm fine with that. Women should have the right to be WGTOW as much as men have the right to be MGTOW. Nobody should mate only because they feel obligated to by social norms. They would neither do themselves a favour nor their partner, because everybody deserves better than a partner who is only together with you because of obligation.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 01:03 PM
1

I hope this doesn't sound patronizing, but I think you should really change your username as a moderator of such a subreddit. Some people already think of us MRAs as fascists and might think that such usernames are meant sincere.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:57 AM
7

Aggravated conduct is sexual assault, domestic violence or stalking, in which at least one of the following factors is present: use of force, causing or taking advantage of incapacitation or recording or showing sexual images without consent. Does "showing sexual images without consent" also include sexting? Would this then mean that if I ask someone for nude pictures while I'm drunk and he or she sends them to me, it's illegal, because I was drunk and wasn't able to legally consent? Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 04:06 AM
5

I highly agree. They admit that "no one has been charged after the incidents", but "do not see an alternative"? So they prefer punishing all refugees for the misbehavior of some, because only punishing those individuals who actually misbehave is not an alternative. Disgusting. At least they will abolish the ban again next week: https://translate.google.de/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.spiegel.de%2Fpanorama%2Fbornheim-tabuzone-schwimmbad-streit-ueber-fluechtlinge-a-1072280.html
/r/MensRights15/01/16 08:13 PM
5

I think that's fair. Anita Sarkeesian and Jessica Valenti also created more MRAs than anybody else. /s
/r/MensRights15/01/16 06:11 PM
1

Did you find it for free? I would be interested in it, but not enough to pay 33€.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 04:31 PM
1

I only watched the first 16 minutes, so sorry for saying something you might have mentioned in your video, but I can honestly understand woman a bit there. I'm also sincerely concerned about getting wrongly accused of rape or child molestation and this definitely affects my behavior towards them. I'm avoiding being alone with them, if I don't know and trust them for a long time: I'm keeping the door open at my office when I'm alone with a woman, I rather wait for the next elevator before sharing…
/r/MensRights15/01/16 03:02 PM
2

Might also be a cultural difference. I'm from Germany and I googled the question in German and in English. German women recommend 2 to 4 weeks in most forums I found, while men are more like 4 to 6 weeks. Most Americans really seem to change the sheets weekly or at least bi-weekly. Interesting, I change after about 4 to 6 weeks and actually never thought too much about that before.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 09:13 AM
3

Now I'm a little bit baffled. I think he could go 2 weeks without changing the sheets and it woudn't bother him. You really think 2 weeks is too long before you change sheets? I would not even consider changing sheets after 2 weeks, admittedly I use my bed only for sleeping, but still.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 08:52 AM
4

One in three women over the age of 15 have experienced physical and/or sexualised violence. Only one in three women over the age of 15 have experienced physical violence??? That's unbelievably low. Two in three women never experiences physical violence by the age of 15? They never got slapped or spanked by their parents, or had a schoolyard brawl, or a fight with their friends or siblings? I would assume that almost all boys by the age of 15 have experienced physical violence at least once.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 08:27 AM
4

That's just not true. Breast cancer is more common, although not by much. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/statistics/ http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/prostate/statistics/
/r/MensRights12/01/16 06:35 PM
2

Less likely to be depressed. From all I read, women are more likely to get diagnosed with depressions than men. Might be that men have more often undiagnosed depressions, the higher suicide rate would suggest so, but this would need proof for me.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 06:27 PM
4

I always knew it: Twitter hates gays.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 07:00 AM
2

Of course you don't contradict women. You wait till they contradict themselves. /s
/r/MensRights09/01/16 07:25 PM
3

Today, some white people feel very guilty about this ugly history and wish to distance themselves from the stigma of racism. Yeah, I know. You Americans are really awful. Fortunately we Germans have nothing in our history to feel guilty about. /s
/r/MensRights08/01/16 11:30 PM
3

Do not tar all men with same brush. Where did I do that?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 09:06 PM
3

11 of the 12 people killed during the Charlie Hebdo attacks were men, so according to their logic people, who never fought for men's rights, should also have had no problem with the Charlie Hebdo attacks. IMHO the awful thing about the Cologne attacks and the Charlie Hebdo attacks was that it was violence against HUMANS, not especially that it was violence against men or women. So I disagree with this article in that regard, although they might be right that some people are exploiting those atta…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 08:57 PM
3

Alice Schwarzer, Germany's most famous feminist since the 70s, and her magazine Emma have always been very outspoken against Islam and are also now, much more than the mainstream media. I'm not a fan on her, but we really shouldn't rewrite history.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 10:25 AM
32

Why does an average have a range? Should it not be one number?
/r/MensRights03/01/16 10:07 PM
1

Why exactly did you post this video?
/r/MensRights02/01/16 08:50 AM
44

That's not a crime. Yes, it is!
/r/MensRights02/01/16 08:47 AM
2

It can be applied only when the behavior has had a "serious effect" on the victim's life or causes them to fear violence if they don't comply. as can repeatedly telling someone they are worthless. How can being told that you're worthless have "a 'serious effect' on the victim's life or causes them to fear violence"?
/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:18 AM
4

It is not meant to be sexy. Doesn't have to be. Target audience for fashion shows are other women, not men.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:02 AM
1

What about women with an eating disorder? Are they getting punished twice for their disease then?
/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:00 AM
7

I find 2 years perfectly reasonable.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 06:36 PM
2

Only the tweet is by Christina. The article is by Jim Rose.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 01:57 PM
9

So it's ok to say that women are superior at reading and writing to men, but not ok to say that men are superior at science and math to women? Or why is this article going such lengths to omit saying that?
/r/MensRights27/12/15 05:15 AM
9

lol @Economic Abuse How about earning her own money?
/r/MensRights26/12/15 09:16 AM
27

For 500 years, they've exploited their fellow man and plundered the planet. Yeah, I know. Really awful what mankind has become within the last 500 years due to those evil white men: we have cars, airplanes, computers, telephones, a much higher life expectancy, work much less hours, less starvation, less epidemics, heating, better water supply, washing machines, ... They really screwed mankind those evil white men. /s
/r/MensRights23/12/15 11:46 PM
1

From now on I will call everybody who doesn't like Donald Trump a misandrist.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 03:50 PM
2

Misandry is nothing new Unfortunately this is so true. The history of humanity is a history of misandry where men died in wars, had to work so much harder than women, prove their worthiness as humans and earn their right to live, while women always lived on the chocolate side. Nowadays misandry is really nothing new, only the word.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 07:22 PM
2

It is politically incorrect to say, but male soldiers would have a difficult time withstanding the screams of a captured female companion as she is raped and tortured. That's not different from knowing that male comrades are tortured. "Leave no man behind" is no joke.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:01 AM
1

http://www.pyladies.com/ If your feminity is too fragile to learn programming.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:52 AM
1

What is the 2nd thing?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:50 AM
1

It doesn't directly say though that she won't be prosecuted. It only says that they are trying to find out her reasons first.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:45 PM
-1

I agree. Especially because I think MRAs tend to be more libertarian than socialist.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 12:37 PM
5

Exactly, but don't expect them to tell you which kind they are. You have to read it from their eyes or you are a misogynist.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 04:32 PM
2

A lot of a "Don't hold the door open for women" stuff How about those statements "Don't feel obliged to hold the door open for women (or men). Do it as a gift."? Or "If you can help other humans with little effort, do it. Not because they're women or men, just because they're humans."?
/r/MensRights13/12/15 03:13 AM
7

Definitely hard to tell: http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/19448/ Although the university has fixed it now.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 11:02 PM
1

Telling rape jokes is not necessarily sexual harassment. Rape jokes can apply to men as well. Assuming it's all true what is written in the article, I also find their behaviour very problematic, to say at least. They are not only telling rape jokes, they encourage rape and insult people. "fine if you've tried having sex with a passed out girl" - that's no joke, jokes have a punchline and are funny. Of course words can't harm anyone, but they also demolish the interior of pubs, those guys are rea…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 04:47 PM
2

My friends always let me go first playing games, I was always praised for kicking ass in kickball. I don't want to tell you how you have to feel, but in my opinion this is no big deal. I would assume that they give you compliments and such because they like you as a person, not because they feel obliged to because you are a woman. To me such compliments are a gift and no duty and so I have no problem with them. I don't like politicizing every minor human interaction, that's what feminists do. (H…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:22 PM
2

If that's 3.1.1, I don't want to know how Feminism 95 or Vista will look like.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 09:40 PM
7

We should imprison all women accused of false accusation.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 09:38 PM
3

Tax for razors on the other hand is 20%: https://fullfact.org/factcheck/economy/vat_tampon_tax_jaffa_cakes_razors-49237
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:37 PM
3

Wait until it is him He's gay.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 04:00 AM
17

I think he or she is right. It's also complete ideology that humans need a brain to be called alive. Many live very well without one and even have a tumblr blog. /s
/r/MensRights09/12/15 12:54 AM
2

Totally agree. If you want to give them a fair chance to clarify their POV, you should ask them themselves and not us.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 11:13 PM
2

This is disingenuous, the reason males get shot by police is because males are more likely to be violent and police are less likely to take chances with them. Sure, but if you take that into account black people would even be underrepresented. As you can see on The Guardian's site, 266 of the people shot by the police were black - 527 were white. Here on the other hand you can see that about half of all murderers were black. If you take sex into account ~95% of all people killed by the police ar…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:36 PM
6

I think think that violence against men is so much the default that you just tend to overlook it. It has to do with "not seeing the forest for the trees". Or the journalist phrase "Man bites dog" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_bites_dog_(journalism) ). Take for example the cases in which policemen killed black people in recent years. Those people were always male, but the media never put an emphasis on the fact that they were male, only on the fact that they were black. And why not? Because…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:04 PM
3

Rape usually has no proof That's true actually. Often there is so little proof, you could almost believe that nothing ever happened. /s
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:14 PM
1

world leaders who rip apart someone for suggesting refusing Muslims entry People from foreign countries generally care much more what the USA are doing than they care what Canada, Australia, UK, France or Germany are doing.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 06:48 PM
25

But some of the other students reportedly escalated the situation by taunting the boy and saying that he wanted to see the girl naked, and it was at that point that the principal stepped in. The principal punished him for being taunted? Hopefully hoax.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:36 PM
112

Haven't watched the whole video yet, but she really seems nice and upright for a nowadays feminist. She doesn't twist his words. She doesn't call him a 'rape apologist' just because he disagrees with her. Makes me able listening to her without an urge to vomit.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 06:35 PM
35

Although I greatly support her article and I know that she probably wrote this because she wants to convince the unconvinced and not preach to the choir, it still struck me: Also, try telling the mother of a son that her child would be easier to lose. Why their mothers? Why not their fathers? Or the sons themselves that their lives are worth less? I know: "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." - Hillary Clinton
/r/MensRights07/12/15 04:20 PM
12

I fear the same is coming for europe - that we will live in military states on constant terror alert. Germany actually abolished conscription just four years ago. And I don't see any sign that it will come back soon.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 04:15 PM
1

Could be a story from The Onion.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 03:27 PM
9

I swear the research done into online abuse showed that men were by far the overwhelming victim of all types bar rape threats. True: http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/10/22/online-harassment/?beta=true&utm_expid=53098246-2.Lly4CFSVQG2lphsg-KopIg.1&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.de%2F Overall, men are somewhat more likely than women to experience at least one of the elements of online harassment, 44% vs. 37%. In terms of specific experiences, men are more likely than women to encounter name-…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 03:00 PM
3

I honestly don't have much of a problem with his statement, although I don't agree with it entirely. I'm sure back in the early 90's, when I assume he said that, he really just meant actual rape in the legal sense and not nowadays enhanced Feminist understanding of "rape" which also encompasses regret sex and similiar. I also think that rape is one of the worst crimes (worse than theft, burglary, fraud - less worse than murder though). And I also agree that teaching people not to become criminal…
/r/MensRights06/12/15 03:16 PM
1

Wow, 8870 views and 1242 comments on the video. You don't see that often.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 02:17 PM
1

Or this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:30 PM
3

So digging in the entrails of dead people was her "real woman's dream" when she was a child? I think you made the right choice.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:46 AM
10

Men don't want to sit on a couch and talk about feelings. I'd rather build something or work with my hands. Men don't bond, open up, or heal emotionally like women do. Depends on your personality and how serious your problems are. If you only had a bad, you are probably right for most men. But if you're dealing with bigger problems like alcoholism or being suicidal, you should better seek outside help and do a therapy, even as man.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 12:58 PM
3

Yes, but according to those feminists who believe in Patriarchy, it's like that (or at least that's how I understand them): -If a woman gets wealthy, she made it because of good, honest, hard work. -If a man gets wealthy, he only made it because he's a man, because he exploited others, glass ceiling, patriarchy, privileges or other shady ways. The Nazis had similiar theories about rich jews and rich aryans: -Jews practiced usury -Aryans did honest productive things
/r/MensRights04/12/15 10:36 AM
1

I think the other is just a re-publication.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 09:05 AM
1

I assumed you were able to use google too ;) http://www.forumophilia.com/topic287913.html
/r/MensRights04/12/15 09:03 AM
3

Although I have no proof of course, I tend to believe them. !!!ALL LINKS NSFW!!! It seems to be true that Amber went to hospital because of an injury : http://www.xcritic.com/review/27230/amber-rayne-2-young-to-fall-in-love-3/: Amber Rayne, a brunette with a love of sucking lollipops, was up next as scraggly James Deen finished his paperwork at the table during the interview (finishing there with a discussion of a trip to the hospital concerning a cell phone up her ass). http://www.adultdvdtalk.…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 12:24 PM
4

It's basically taking Marxist idea class struggles and changing it from the rich and poor, to men and women. I would actually say it's closer to Nationalsocialism: Marxists only say the wealthy are privileged because they are wealthy. And the poor are underprivileged because they are poor. Nationalsocialists say jews are privileged because they are on average wealthier than aryans and the wealthy are privileged, although there are also rich aryans and poor jews. Basically they are against the we…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 06:02 AM
-1

He might incapacitate her through drugs or alcohol (or both) to make her more vulnerable. Attention women, you have agency over yourselves, if someone offers you drugs or alcohol, you have the right to refuse. If you accept drugs or alcohol at a frat house, you are incapacitating yourself. She later elaborates this statement on examples though: One member, for example, reported that she had been sexually assaulted by another Harvard student after a party. Because she was incapacitated by alcohol…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 06:41 AM
8

Article is really disgusting. In 1980 there were just over 15,000 women in state prisons. So? Why are we assuming that the gender ratio in 1980 was the "just" and the current is the "injust"? Could it not also be seen as a feminist success that the women ratio increased? Still more than 90% are male. In most other areas (except for homeless, suicides, drug addicts and such) it would be seen as a success if the women ratio gets closer to 50%. Why not here? Although as a libertarian I agree with t…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 04:57 AM
2

This would also be illegal in Germany under 182 (3).1: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html#p1617 (3) A person over twenty-one years of age who abuses a person under sixteen years of age by engaging in sexual activity with the person or causing the person to engage actively in sexual activity with him or inducing the person to engage in sexual activity with a third person or to suffer sexual acts committed on their own body by a third person, and thereby exploits th…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 04:32 AM
4

Feel really bad for you. Was not so kindly adopted by my step-father, (over my real father's protests), but you know it's not the same. Under which jurisdication is this even legal?
/r/MensRights29/11/15 08:47 PM
2

I hope that there would be a shit storm even if he were white, but I assume hoax too.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 03:31 PM
1

That's how I understand it too. She will have to go to jail if she re-offends within two years or if she doesn't do the 120 hours of work. To me this sounds like a reasonable sentence for Europe, where punishments generally tend to be less harsh than in the US.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 11:16 PM
4

The survey linked in the article sounds reasonable: http://www.aau.edu/Climate-Survey.aspx?id=16525 More than six in 10 student respondents (63.3 percent) believe that a report of sexual assault or sexual misconduct would be taken seriously by campus officials. Nonconsensual sexual contact involving drugs and alcohol constitute a significant percentage of the incidents. Significantly more than half of the victims of nonconsensual sexual contact who reported the incident to an agency or organizat…
/r/MensRights26/11/15 06:25 PM
2

She was given a four month prison term, suspended for two years, and ordered to do 120 hours of unpaid work. Sounds like a fair sentence to me. What would you expect more?
/r/MensRights26/11/15 05:58 PM
8

I completly agree with you and know several studies which showed that men are punished harder for the same crimes than women. But to be fair this happened in New Zealand - there would also have been no capital punishment if a man had done it.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:11 PM
5

But if I understand this article correctly, they only ruled that the lawsuit is permitted, not that she will get any money. "In a unanimous decision, five justices of the supreme court – the deputy president, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge – said the family court could not strike out Wyatt’s claim without a full consideration of the issues. But the judges warned Wyatt she faces “formidable difficulties” in seeking to establish that any financial order should be m…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:00 PM
2

this is some serious progress. Not sure, could also mean that 8 years MRA was not as necessary as today, because the world was not so crazy back then.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 01:09 AM
3

Feminist logic: I want girls to stop playing with dolls and with Lego instead. So what do I do? Forbid girls to play with dolls? Nah, too easy. Forbid boys to play with Lego instead. (Just for the record: forbidding the girls to play with dolls, I would also decline)
/r/MensRights25/11/15 12:50 AM
1

It's pretty much the same in most European countries.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 12:36 AM
10

But then they would not get the answers they predefined before the so-called "study" even started. /s
/r/MensRights24/11/15 07:36 PM
3

Yeah, Trump v Clinton sounds like Devil v Deep Blue Sea. Although I would still prefer the devil over both ...
/r/MensRights15/11/15 08:32 PM
1

Hm, somehow I don't feel offended by this comic. I actually identify with the economist and most of the others are obvious BS.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:58 PM
2

But, I don't think campuses get to opt out of having a policy for how they investigate allegations of rape. I think nobody is blaming the colleges for having to implement those stupid rules. It is the federal government which is to be blamed, but how else can you fight it? After all I think fighting the colleges is fine since they are institutions and no human beings with feelings. But you should feel sorry for the deans who have to implement those rules, which most of them probably would also p…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 10:28 AM
1

It's an online training? Do you have a link? (Have always been interested how those trainings look like)
/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:26 PM
6

Who says fathers shouldn't pay for child support? The only things which I see being criticized in this subreddit: Boys who got raped by older women having to pay child support for the child originated from this rape. Men who got cuckolded having to pay child support for another man's child Child support being so high that the child AND the mother can live from it. Or being over 50% and the mother having to pay less although she's also a parent Having to pay child support, but not being allowed t…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:08 AM
7

Ok, I didn't think of abortion when I read the comment since I don't consider it as "birth control". And although I'm Pro-Choice, I wouldn't necessarily consider all Pro-Life activists as sexists or misogynists albeit some certainly are. I think the moral questions with Pro-Choice v Pro-Life are more "Where does one see the beginning of human life (birth or conception)?" and "Is one obliged (the women) to provide one's body functions to somebody else (the embryo) if the other's life depends on i…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:36 AM
2

Could you please elaborate?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:03 AM
2

That's per week though.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 12:35 AM
7

To me there are some differences: The pay gap is often used by feminists as an argument to call for affirmative action and gender quota by law which is a discrimination against men IMHO, the workplace fatalities are not used as such an argument. If they only complained about the pay gap and thought therefore more women should go into STEM but without a quota or affirmative action or similiar, I would fully support them. Seeing the pay gap as an injustice makes only sense under the premise that a…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 10:59 PM
1

I think they used this method: http://dilbert.com/strip/2008-05-08
/r/MensRights08/11/15 08:25 AM
2

Well, if the victim goes to the college authorities first and they don't send her directly to the police (which they often don't), then the evidences (like the hematomes) can't be conserved. Their will be not enough evidence to bring the rapist before court and he will only be expelled from college and not have to go to jail. So he can go to another college or start working where he can keep preying on other women.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 12:36 PM
1

Just like manspreading, it proves that men feel they’re more entitled to public space than other people, particularly women. Because this isn’t just a case of a man refusing to give up his seat for an older woman who maybe needs it more. Wait ... did manspreading not mean that a man takes up two seats at first? Now it means that men should give up their one seat to women who might (of course) need it more. Furthermore she talks about pole hogging being an issue in trains which are so full that t…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 09:40 AM
5

rape was still hugely under-reported in comparison to other crimes. Which other crimes? I mean I have no problem believing that rape is more under-reported than murder, arson or burglary. But I can't believe that it's more under-reported than battery, theft or threating. Would also be interesting to know how often rapes can be prosecuted depending on how fast the victim goes to the police. I would assume that if the victims go to the police when they still have hematomes, much more evidences can…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 05:39 AM
9

There are different men's right issues. It depends what you are especially concerned on: Do you care especially about homelessness? Maybe you could invest those 30 minutes helping in a homeless shelter Do you care especially about suicide? Maybe you could help working for a suicide hotline And so on ...
/r/MensRights05/11/15 03:47 AM
11

That brings me to my second point: As long as universities are responsible for investigating and adjudicating rape accusations — and they are responsible, alongside the police and the courts, according to the federal Department of Education — they have to get better at it. That's the whole point. Colleges should not investigate rape accusations, the police should. If a murder, a battery, a theft, a burglary or an arson would happen on a campus the police would investigate, not the college. And i…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:54 AM
5

I know. "_____ is a tool of the patriarchy." (Fill in the blank.) It's a conspiracy theory: for Nazis it's the jews, for others it's the Illuminati and for feminists it's the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 08:04 PM
10

Depends on what one understands under "friendly". The expression "RTFM" might best describe which values the open source community holds: if you tried to solve a problem yourself but still can't and seek for help, most people in the community are very helpful and friendly, but if you're lazy and don't even try to solve problems yourself first, don't use google, search functions in message boards or manuals, and expect other people to provide complete solutions for you, the community can be very …
/r/MensRights04/11/15 06:31 PM
1

marketing campaigns which target women How da hell is that an issue? (Sorry for being a bit off-topic here)
/r/MensRights04/11/15 01:15 PM
7

Intersectionality basically means putting into account gender, race, sexual orientation, disabilities and so on ... just not how much money the person actually earns, how much power they have or how much discrimination and violence they actually face. And why not? Because most feminists are well earning middle- to upper-class women who never had any real problems in their life and wouldn't score well on this scale. Oprah Winfrey is disadvanteged according to intersectional feminism. A white, het…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:29 PM
1

Women tend to have less work experience because they more often stay at home some time when they get children. Also depends with who you argue. If you argue with a hardcore communist who thinks that everybody should earn the same generally good luck. But if you argue with someone who generally believes in capitalism and that it isn't injust that a doctor earns more than a hairdresser, ask her why it is injust then that a hairdresser earns less than a handyman.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:37 PM
10

Great article. pseudo-legal scrutiny. Should this not make those courses illegal if they are not held by a solicitor?
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:24 PM
7

Considering that it's only men who need to attend this Are you sure? Always assumed those courses are mandatory for women too.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:18 PM
2

(On the other hand maybe the whole feminism is satire)
/r/MensRights02/11/15 11:09 PM
4

You could take it as satire though ... if it wasn't by the woman who shot Andy Warhol.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 11:06 PM
3

Ad hominems definitely don't make it harassement. If I say "I don't care about your medical advice, because you're not a doctor", it's not harassement. Neither if I say "I don't believe a word you say, because you lied to me so many times before."
/r/MensRights01/11/15 05:27 PM
1

Qu'as-tu fait John? Qu'as-tu fait?
/r/MensRights01/11/15 02:43 PM
-1

Most people making movies are male, if women want more representation they should come up with more movies. But that's exactly what they are doing here. Put your money where your mouth is, and create something worthwhile starring women, don't come along and steal what men have created. Since it's such a big production I assume that they are not literally stealing but have the proper licenses. And if you consider all re-makes as "stealing" than how was the Ocean's Eleven from 2001 not stealing to…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 11:45 PM
7

I guess I don't see the problem? As a believer in capitalism and free market, neither do I. If there is an audience for such a movie, willing to pay to see it, I say more power to them. Especially since an under-representation of women in movies and literature is pretty much the only thing where I would agree with feminists.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 10:50 PM
1

RedPillers don't, but they do care that hundreds, thousands, of men will be convicted of regret rape on campuses across the US and worldwide, eventually. Big difference there: MRAs fight against false accusations and a broadening of the definition of rape. RedPillers often think that rape is generally ok, since women want predators and so-called "alpha men" who abuse them. If someone who is a beta-male in their opinion gets wrongly accused of rape, they even applaud since he was not entitled to …
/r/MensRights22/10/15 06:43 PM
1

Be welcome, I'm also pretty new. I would not say that I have an issue with those forms of consent. If someone says for himself that he wants to apply to those standards, I totally support it and even think it's great. What I have an issue with is that those who don't apply to those standards are being called "rapists", one of the worst kind of criminals there is. And if people want to teach those kind of consent standards, I also have no issue with, but not in mandatory classes at public univers…
/r/MensRights21/10/15 09:13 PM
2

What I would be interested in: are they using the actual legal definitions of rape and consent from the legal system those classes are held in, or are they using their own feminist POV definitions ("Yes means Yes", tipsy = no consent possible) for those classes even if the law says different?
/r/MensRights21/10/15 12:01 AM
2

I completly disagree with that. I think that this was a great article from a MRA POV. I mean how can we on one side complain about women almost always getting custody when on the other side we say that single men should not adopt and see having children just as a burden? That being said I would also not want to adopt a children because I don't think that I would make a good dad for some mental health issues I have, but I think men who adopt children are great and deserve support.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:42 PM
2

Not figured out? Maybe some people have figured out, but just don't want to live in a relationship.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:32 PM
1

2 is better than one, mainly because: Then 3 should also be better than 2.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:29 PM
3

I'm from Germany and fortunately, at least to my knowledge, there are no such classes here yet. But I also didn't even know that they were already in the UK. Thought it would be an US thing only. What I just don't understand how are such classes even legal? In Germany and as I read here http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/practicing-law-without-a-license.htm also in the US, legal advice can only be given by licensed jurists who have finished their studies. But as I understand those cl…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:59 AM
2

Question 2 was pretty stupid since radio waves actually ARE light waves.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 06:44 PM
5

angry, violent ex-boyfriends I'm not a psychiatrist. Maybe she needs to see an actual psychiatrist. Depending on how much violence she has experienced and how severe her fear is.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 07:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter