~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crime statistics do not support the ‘rape culture’ theoryBeware of the oft-cited FBI 8% figure: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4w1z94/information_about_fbi_8_unfounded_accusation/ | /r/MensRights | 16/05/23 01:49 PM |
| 1 | I was faulsly accused of sexual assault at my new schoolConsult a legal specialist in false accusations, such as Andrew Miltenberg. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/23 08:51 PM |
| 1 | Feminism = Pink TerrorPeople actually die from feminism and from female privilege. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/23 08:43 PM |
| 2 | AITA or did I do the right thing? Asked to move on from Daughter's swimming class.You did the right thing. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/22 07:33 PM |
| 3 | What do you think feminist gets right?Correct on both points. Even MRAs white knight. That, and society’s gynocentrism, are why MR has advanced little. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/22 03:15 PM |
| 3 | To Even Out Gender/Race/Ethnicity Pay Gaps: Store ‘Suggests’ Higher Prices for White MenYou certainly don’t, if you’re a feminist. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/21 01:14 AM |
| 1 | To Even Out Gender/Race/Ethnicity Pay Gaps: Store ‘Suggests’ Higher Prices for White MenNo, it isn’t. The last thing feminism wants is equality. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pdnoyh/whenever_i_talk_about_anything_gender_related_and/hatjgln/ | /r/MensRights | 30/12/21 01:14 AM |
| 1 | So, today my ex wife phoned me up to complain...If you get 50/50 but never say a negative word to your daughter about her mother, your daughter will later respect you for it. That is, instinctively some children understand and respect the parent who does not try to alienate the other. As she gets older, she will draw her own conclusions. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/21 11:44 PM |
| 5 | Toddler dies in botched circumcisionYour article says circumciser, not rabbi. Such misrepresentation harms the intactivist cause by unnecessarily validating the accusation of anti-Semitism. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/21 06:11 AM |
| 4 | Cat-calling women in pubs or on the street could become a crime in planned crackdown on violence against females. It will also recommend making ‘inciting hatred against women’ a criminal offence"Does anyone here want to harass women on the street? Because if not, this law won't affect you at all. Liar. The definition of “harass” has always and deliberately been so ambiguous and flexible as to represent a threat to every male. Further, every happy coupling requires initiative, which may now be termed harassment at the female’s whim. And the legislation will have little effect upon those men who, like Bill Clinton, fail to understand that harass is one word. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/21 06:30 AM |
| 1 | Cat-calling women in pubs or on the street could become a crime in planned crackdown on violence against females. It will also recommend making ‘inciting hatred against women’ a criminal offence"For once at least, the Americans have done something right in their First Amendment making such legislation impossible. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/21 06:23 AM |
| 3 | Complete insanity in comments by feministsmatrimony matrimoney. FTFY | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 06:43 PM |
| 2 | Craze of False Paedophile Slurs against TeachersExcellent - thank you! | /r/MensRights | 26/11/21 05:07 PM |
| 1 | Craze of False Paedophile Slurs against TeachersWhy "hold up"? Generalisations about abuse in any large set of institutions have no bearing on individual cases; every accused should still retain the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty in court. Even at the individual level, defamation on TikTok is a tort and is certainly no substitute for the judicial system. The complainants have the right to submit their complaints to the judicial system via the police, with any proof, not to engage in uncorroborated accusation and defamation … | /r/MensRights | 26/11/21 05:06 PM |
| 3 | Craze of False Paedophile Slurs against TeachersFalse allegations destroy lives. The USA and UK have particularly suffered from prosecutor over-reach during (false) sex-abuse hysteria: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-care_sex-abuse_hysteria Credit should go to the Wall Street Journal's Dorothy Rabinowitz for almost single-handedly fighting the hysteria, first by brave WSJ op-eds criticising out-of-control prosecutors, then by her book, No Crueler Tyrannies. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/21 09:59 PM |
| 0 | Some idiots are celebrating that Jacob Blake was paralyzed from the waist down because of the sexual assault accusation against him, even though there’s no evidence he was actually convictedIt is rare. There's over 50 million police interactions per year. Roughly 1000 of them aka 0.00002% of them result in a fatal encounter for the suspect. This is true - but 1.000 fatalities annually is too many. Further, some of those fatalities involve individuals already under control, such as David Kassick. completely innocent civilians, such as the Diallo and Atatiana Jefferson (Aaron Dean) cases. You say, "even just occasions where a police officer was assaulted less than 2% result in death … | /r/MensRights | 25/11/21 09:37 PM |
| 0 | Some idiots are celebrating that Jacob Blake was paralyzed from the waist down because of the sexual assault accusation against him, even though there’s no evidence he was actually convictedI don't care if he failed to obey 1,000 orders - shooting him in the back and paralysing him is excessive. "What would you suggest they had done at that point?" is indeed an excellent question. One would think a modern, civilised society would find methods to handle non-compliant civilians other than the police shooting them. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/21 09:29 PM |
| 1 | Some idiots are celebrating that Jacob Blake was paralyzed from the waist down because of the sexual assault accusation against him, even though there’s no evidence he was actually convictedAll balderdash. Why do you want to justify misdeeds by police? Restraining orders are granted like sugar. A restraining order is no proof of wrongdoing by a male. Female allegations in restraining orders are rarely fact-checked. Nor have you fact-checked your accusatory mis-statements about Blake. A "year" or not, the Blake case is still relevant - the city and others remain a-boil. He was entering his car. There is no proof he was going for a knife. He was shot in the back in what could arguabl… | /r/MensRights | 25/11/21 06:55 PM |
| 1 | Some idiots are celebrating that Jacob Blake was paralyzed from the waist down because of the sexual assault accusation against him, even though there’s no evidence he was actually convictedI think the cops were justified in what they did given his history What "history"????? All articles mention as "history" are accusations by an ex-girlfriend. Since when are accusations the same as conviction? | /r/MensRights | 21/11/21 07:43 AM |
| 0 | Some idiots are celebrating that Jacob Blake was paralyzed from the waist down because of the sexual assault accusation against him, even though there’s no evidence he was actually convictedPolice were called because he was called in by someone saying he was trespassing and had stolen their car keys. The "someone" was a vindictive ex-girlfriend. We know all about the veracity of accusations by ex-girlfriends, don't we? | /r/MensRights | 21/11/21 07:41 AM |
| 1 | Some idiots are celebrating that Jacob Blake was paralyzed from the waist down because of the sexual assault accusation against him, even though there’s no evidence he was actually convictedthe guy had a history of violence and had an arrest warrant out on him related to sexual assault Not exactly. He was accused of violence and of sexual assault by an ex-lover, mother of at least one of his children. The articles do not indicate whether she had any evidence for these accusations. Uncorroborated accusations without conviction do not merit the term "history of violence". | /r/MensRights | 21/11/21 07:38 AM |
| 14 | "It’s Time To Debunk The COVID-Domestic Violence Myth"Notice the author's credentials: Edward Bartlett is the founder and a board member of the Coalition to End Domestic Violence. He holds a Ph.D. in Public Health from Johns Hopkins University. | /r/MensRights | 18/11/21 02:53 PM |
| 1 | UK: Why must every man on TV today be a monster? A tidal wave of male-hating shows depicts women as victims, this toxic sex war hurts us allAuthors Nathanson & Young analysed cultural misandry very thoroughly in their book, Spreading Misandry. It is one of four books they have published about misandry: https://www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=nathanson+young+misandry | /r/MensRights | 17/11/21 08:09 PM |
| 1 | College student "scared" that workers who installed radiators in "Female and Transgender Collective" housing were all "cisgender men."Here's another report of the same issue: https://archive.md/MZcEz. It's unclear whether to consider this simple misandry, or instead prejudice based upon socio-economic class - that is, contempt for the working man. I suspect snobbish contempt for the working man is often a pretext for misandry. Every bit of our physical civilisation is installed or maintained by the working man in productive, manual work (often destructive of the body) - yet little-acknowledged by feminism. Among many: We needn… | /r/MensRights | 19/10/21 09:05 PM |
| 14 | "Why Men Are Disappearing on Campus" (WSJ)While I really do like the discussion of men's issues, I personally do think this sub blames women too much Women do make up the majority of the electorate. Is it likely modern society would be so anti-male were not women generally in favour of it? There is also: Gender Differences in Automatic In-Group Bias: Why Do Women Like Women More Than Men Like Men? https://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf and has trended towards more extreme views du… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/21 07:17 PM |
| 16 | "Why Men Are Disappearing on Campus" (WSJ)You don't learn, do you? You just make yet more generalisations to the effect that women are better than men. You'd make a good member of the Klan. And you prove that "feminism" is really just a contraction of "female supremacism". There's also the hypocrisy of at once asserting low female representation (in any given area) must be due to anti-female sexism, but low male representation must be due to women's natural superiority. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/21 07:10 PM |
| 29 | "Why Men Are Disappearing on Campus" (WSJ)You seize upon one question - how many women allowed to uni in past centuries. But you ignore: Modern education structured to war against males for the past quarter-century. Society's brutal mis-treatment of males in past centuries. So no, we're not talking about the number of women entering college. We're talking about a system of brutalisation of the male, extensively propagated by modern academia. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/21 07:02 PM |
| 24 | "Why Men Are Disappearing on Campus" (WSJ)So is too many women in college a problem or not? So is your blindness to blatant discrimination against men, a problem or not? | /r/MensRights | 21/09/21 06:58 PM |
| 46 | "Why Men Are Disappearing on Campus" (WSJ)You, my friend, appear unable to criticise foolish and misandrist statements in an effective manner. Nor, apparently, have you anything to contribute to the issue. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/21 05:09 PM |
| 40 | "Why Men Are Disappearing on Campus" (WSJ)Men literally weren't allowed to survive until recently in history - enslaved to the female and forced into body-destroying work. Men still live on average 3 to 5 years less than females. Now that is real oppression. Overall, women's historical oppression is a myth: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ | /r/MensRights | 21/09/21 05:06 PM |
| 43 | "Why Men Are Disappearing on Campus" (WSJ)That is one of the most mindless, vacuous, foolish statements I have ever heard. There are 8 billion human beings on earth, with too much variance for generalisations. Any statement beginning "men are ..." or "women are ..." is bound to be inaccurate. It is not clear whether the range of intelligence among women is as wide as among men. The male bell curve seems to have longer tails at both the lower and upper ranges - hence more male Einsteins than female. "flourish when given freedom" implies … | /r/MensRights | 21/09/21 04:40 PM |
| 141 | "Why Men Are Disappearing on Campus" (WSJ)At least the article raises the issue. But notice that its analysis omits the most obvious problem: Academia has long been an unremittingly hostile environment for males, from childhood to university. There has been little progress since Christina Hoff Sommers pioneered this matter two decades ago. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/21 02:39 PM |
| 1 | Why Are Some of Professor Janice Fiamengo's Pro-Male Videos Unavailable?Thanks for the reference. I'll check it out. if the same content was on the youtube channel it's likely it got banned due to the anti-vax content rather than the men's rights content The superb Fiamengo video(s) I'd seen, now missing from YouTube, had MR-like content (including content about the Brock Turner case) and no vax-related content. | /r/MensRights | 03/09/21 08:33 AM |
| 2 | Why Are Some of Professor Janice Fiamengo's Pro-Male Videos Unavailable?Thank you. Fiamengo is a gem. Is there not an alternate platform to host her material without censorious interference? | /r/MensRights | 02/09/21 09:29 PM |
| 2 | Why Are Some of Professor Janice Fiamengo's Pro-Male Videos Unavailable?My question was different - not why some of her videos are there, but why some excellent ones have been removed. | /r/MensRights | 02/09/21 09:27 PM |
| 2 | Recent federal court rulings are huge victories for Title IX fairness and major setbacks for extremist feminists in higher education and elsewhere.Look, if you insist upon insulting me and mis-representing my arguments, I reserve the right to insult you back. Goose, gander. The victim was intoxicated and passed out, therefore under California law, she cannot consent in any sort of sexual acts. "Passed out" (at the time of digital penetration) is a lie. There is no evidence indicating the timing of his fingering relative to her passing out. California Penal Code section 261 (a)(3) Your interpretation of the penal code is penile rather than … | /r/MensRights | 02/09/21 06:52 PM |
| 3 | Recent federal court rulings are huge victories for Title IX fairness and major setbacks for extremist feminists in higher education and elsewhere.Your Turner information is completely wrong. His pants were never down, and his dick never out. He engaged in consensual foreplay, nothing more. He was railroaded, as was the judge, Persky. The facts: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/byg1z4/brock_turner_again_case_in_the_news_again_victim/eqhg6ez https://www.scribd.com/doc/315432156/Brock-Turner-police-report From the police report: Jonsson said, "We found him on top of the girl." ... I noticed that his pants seemed disheveled around… | /r/MensRights | 02/09/21 05:15 AM |
| 23 | Recent federal court rulings are huge victories for Title IX fairness and major setbacks for extremist feminists in higher education and elsewhere.It is also the ongoing work of courageous lawyers, such as Andrew Miltenberg and Kimberly Lau. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/21 12:20 AM |
| 1 | Bumped into an exes family member, now ive been accused of rapeYou’re right - at this point, it’s not worth the effort nor risk. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/21 01:09 PM |
| 1 | Bumped into an exes family member, now ive been accused of rapeYou’re right. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/21 01:07 PM |
| 1 | Bumped into an exes family member, now ive been accused of rapeI dont plan on taking any action, legal or otherwise unless I am backed into a corner - so no dramas there. Probably the right plan. But “get informed” anyway. For example, violating a restraining order is a criminal act. But is her verbal no-contact demand the equivalent of a court's restraining order? I doubt it. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/21 03:21 AM |
| 6 | Bumped into an exes family member, now ive been accused of rapeOP, don’t let her ever again take you by surprise. Consult a lawyer now even if you make no legal motion against her. You probably need no preemptive action. Just find out where you stand. Forewarned is forearmed. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/21 03:19 AM |
| 1 | Whenever I talk about anything gender related and how men are discriminated against, my mom gets angry.Yes, you do. What have you done to free men from their second-class status? | /r/MensRights | 29/08/21 04:38 PM |
| 8 | Whenever I talk about anything gender related and how men are discriminated against, my mom gets angry.Wrong. Correcting fake history gets tiresome. Nineteenth and early twentieth-century feminism was never about equality. It viewed women as superior to men. It was racist, demanding the vote for white women to counterbalance minority men. It demanded and obtained yet more privilege for women - for example, only the male assets to be used to support the family. It sought and obtained the same voting rights as men with none of the responsibilities to work or conscription, reducing men to wage slave… | /r/MensRights | 29/08/21 04:35 PM |
| 1 | Should men have rights when it comes to abortion?Excellent comment. Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/21 03:20 PM |
| 2 | Should men have rights when it comes to abortion?I propose a solution: Legal sanction for women who cannot or do not name the father at birth. Automatic DNA verification at birth. Right of the proved father to renounce fatherhood at birth. Legal sanction for women who have and retain a child without the father’s consent. It can be termed theft of semen or criminal violation of the father’s and child’s civil rights. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/21 03:16 PM |
| 4 | Should men have rights when it comes to abortion?You’re a criminal, using a criminal argument. Men have little to no say in most decisions about contraception, abortion, and infant surrender to adoption, so it is criminal to force responsibility on them. The Americans assert they fought an entire war of independence over the issue of forced responsibility without say. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/21 03:07 PM |
| 1 | Should men have rights when it comes to abortion?I think alimony and child support both crimes against humanity. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/21 03:02 PM |
| -2 | Should men have rights when it comes to abortion?In truth, you’re put off by the idea of men having any rights, particularly any reproductive rights. You deem men untermenschen, mere beasts of burden. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/21 03:00 PM |
| 1 | French feminist groupe openly boast about disrupting in 2012 a conference on Male DV victims within a government funded event about domestic abuse !A difficult question: To what extent does the average woman tacitly support (or not) such misandrist views? One of the commenters appears to be a virulently self-hating male: https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rf/1998-v11-n2-rf1658/058007ar.pdf http://www.erudit.org/revue/RF/1998/v11/n2/058007ar.pdf | /r/MensRights | 28/08/21 02:45 PM |
| 2 | It shouldn't have to be said, but violence is NOT an acceptable answer.I find this post shocking and callous, for a number of reasons. Different male groups in society and in the "manosphere" have significant overlap in issues. Feminists bcame effective politically by numbers, achieved by compromising upon differences. Cannot men do the same? This post goes in the wrong direction. Franklin put it well. I am no expert in MGTOW or incel issues. but it is trivial to name just a few which heavily overlap MR: The imbalance in legal and social rights in relationships; th… | /r/MensRights | 28/08/21 12:48 AM |
| 2 | It shouldn't have to be said, but violence is NOT an acceptable answer.Don’t you mean: mensights + r =/= incels ? | /r/MensRights | 17/08/21 02:36 AM |
| 4 | It shouldn't have to be said, but violence is NOT an acceptable answer.Feminists literally have thrown themselves infront of horses Contrafactual. Emily Davison was singular, not plural. Furthermore, she did not throw herself in front of a horse. She foolishly tried to attach a pendant to a horse at full gallop. She and others were seen practicing in a field the day before, upon a stationary horse. The jockey later committed suicide. That’s rarely mentioned; male lives don’t count. | /r/MensRights | 17/08/21 01:54 AM |
| 1 | Roberta Kaplan, chair of Time's Up and co-founder of its legal defense fund, has resigned from the organization in the face of criticism over her ties to Cuomo's sexual harassment scandal.However, I also believe that there are people, predominantly white women who tend to exploit something that should be geared more towards ACTUALLY marginalized people and white women (the main audience of feminism, which is very exclusionary to women of color and people of color) are way less marginalized in a lot of fields. In his book Myth of the monstrous male, an MRA of an earlier generation, John Gordon, pointed out that white women have usurped positive discrimination for themselves, when … | /r/MensRights | 11/08/21 02:25 AM |
| 1 | Dershowitz: MeToo Destroying ConstitutionYou've been downvoted because you stated it badly. Allow me to attempt to rephrase: Men's civil liberties were more secure before all these women started claiming they were victimised. If men can't adequately respond to these women's often uncorroborated and unfounded accusations, there will be more men in jail than free. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/21 08:08 PM |
| 1 | Dershowitz: MeToo Destroying ConstitutionI really don't like Dershowitz. I read some of his books and they badly plagiarized other sources. So I wish his point were made by someone different. Except, it's not just this point. He has repeatedly gone "against the flow" in favour of principle: As early as the 1990's, he expressed skepticism of publishing the name of the accused but not the accuser. Here, he makes points made by few others, concerning the illegitimacy of the NY AG approach. He is one of the few liberals to acknowledge the … | /r/MensRights | 10/08/21 08:04 PM |
| 2 | I don't think this sub will get banned like MGTOWYou’re right. Neither MR nor MGTOW are misogynist. Accusing them of general hatred or misogyny is simply the matriarchy’s pretext to suppress opposition and enforce TheSubordinationOfMen™ and ThePriceOfPussy™. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/21 01:01 PM |
| 1 | Female Vlogger Details Skepticism of Accusations against Cuomo as MeToo Hit JobYou’re unwise. Feminist society comes first for the bad guys like the Cuomos, then for the good guys like you and me. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/21 03:10 AM |
| 1 | Do you think Andrew Cuomo tasted his own medicine?I dispute your assertions in every one of those cases. Cosby never said the words. He simply replied yes to an opposition lawyer’s ambiguous question about ludes for sex, which might well mean a consensual exchange. In earlier decades, many women offered sex for drugs. Just a few of the issues in the Cosby case: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/51uj6t/new_cosby_accusers_59_and_60/ https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6gp5u8/questions_about_cosby/ Much of Weinstein’s activity … | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 07:27 PM |
| 2 | Do you think Andrew Cuomo tasted his own medicine?The law is wrong - morally, practically, logically, and juridically wrong - to just assume oath-on-oath decisions reliable: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4a8xw3/potential_argument_against_hesaidshesaid/ | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 04:36 PM |
| 11 | Are Women the Superior Gender? One more articleYou’re wrong. It is entirely appropriate for the sub to take note of “idiotic claims” when society has mainstreamed those claims and used them to justify treating men as untermenschen. But rephrasing your comment can be positive: What can and should MRAs do about such brutalisation of men? (Can we light a candle rather than just cursing the darkness?) | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 04:26 PM |
| 1 | Do you think Andrew Cuomo tasted his own medicine?Should multiple women coming forward with multiple corroborating witnesses backing up their stories be treated as at least a substantial indication that the allegations are true? Absolutely. This is wrong. Multiple “witnesses” once swore the sun revolved around the earth; Galileo was prosecuted. But Galileo was right. At Salem, multiple female “witnesses” had 20 innocents put to death. If witnesses are not independent, their “testimony” has zero value as proof of truth. The now-commonplace accep… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 04:12 PM |
| 2 | Do you think Andrew Cuomo tasted his own medicine?You’re entirely right - I myself have given here the example of multiple, false “witnesses” in the Salem witch trials. The problem is dual: Feminist society has abandoned Blackstone and many historically hard-won rules of evidence. Insisting upon independent witnesses would have us defending the likes of Cosby, Weinstein, Sandusky, Epstein, etc. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 04:00 PM |
| 1 | Scummy Vanity Fair trying to turn this into a MRA and Trump supporter issue: Andrew Cuomo’s Only Defenders: Trump Fanatics and...HimselfFrankly, I don’t think Cuomo’s done anything wrong. But I must acknowledge Cuomo and Trump may have had the same problem as Clinton: They didn’t realize "harass" was one word, not two. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 08:33 AM |
| 0 | Scummy Vanity Fair trying to turn this into a MRA and Trump supporter issue: Andrew Cuomo’s Only Defenders: Trump Fanatics and...HimselfWhat nonsense. In Cuomo’s case, flirtation and courting are not harassment, and harassment is not sexual assault. Nor can harassment be “prosecuted” - it's discrimination, a civil matter, not criminal. In Trump’s case, boasting is not assault, and even touching is not assault if the women consented. The fuss about both is neither more nor less than society trying to destroy men in order to maintain an artificially high floor to ThePriceOfPussy™. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 08:20 AM |
| 7 | Years later and still as relevant as ever. Karen Straughan's response to "those aren't real feminists". You're right, you're the real feminist making anonymous, feel good comments about how true feminism is equality. So what about those with consequential power and influence?These type of replies are exactly why advocacy for men goes nowhere. On the contrary, your repulsive insistence upon shitting all over a solid contributor such as Karen, is exactly why advocacy for men gets held back. But it does indeed advance, so your "goes nowhere" is also a lie. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/21 01:55 AM |
| 8 | Years later and still as relevant as ever. Karen Straughan's response to "those aren't real feminists". You're right, you're the real feminist making anonymous, feel good comments about how true feminism is equality. So what about those with consequential power and influence?She admits herself it was random. She's just trying to be modest. Everyone who has accomplished anything in MR has done so through hard work. This includes even those with quirks, from Elam to Esmay to Straughan to Farrell to Kammer to Feit. They're human. She knows the issues and doesn't care. That's a mis-representation. She knows the issues because she was the first to perceive and raise many of them. For example, she was the first or one of the first to answer the vote issue by pointing out … | /r/MensRights | 04/08/21 01:48 AM |
| 4 | Years later and still as relevant as ever. Karen Straughan's response to "those aren't real feminists". You're right, you're the real feminist making anonymous, feel good comments about how true feminism is equality. So what about those with consequential power and influence?You are right that the traditional conservative view/arrangement is anti-male. However, society will never abandon it; hypergamy may be built into the human genome. So, the MR task is not to tilt at windmills but to at least moderate both tradcon and feminist excesses. In that task, the work of Karen Straughan and other female MRAs has been substantial, effective, often brilliant, and much appreciated. There is no need to insist they or any other MRA mutilate their own lives out of "principle". | /r/MensRights | 03/08/21 03:06 PM |
| 5 | Years later and still as relevant as ever. Karen Straughan's response to "those aren't real feminists". You're right, you're the real feminist making anonymous, feel good comments about how true feminism is equality. So what about those with consequential power and influence?she's probably the single most valuable person in the MRM and she has done so much to grow the movement. Hear, hear! Absolutely true. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/21 03:02 PM |
| 9 | Years later and still as relevant as ever. Karen Straughan's response to "those aren't real feminists". You're right, you're the real feminist making anonymous, feel good comments about how true feminism is equality. So what about those with consequential power and influence?Spot on. I'm sorry, how did she abandon men's rights? I was just listening to her on a live stream with the Honey Badgers yesterday. MR is a passionate conviction for all of us. So, even were Karen to decide upon a well-earned break (for reasons of family or just for rest), I doubt she will ever lose the conviction and passion. And, she deserves every bit of praise for all that she has done thus far - a sharp, clear-minded, well-expressed individual who has made a tremendous contribution. You're… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/21 02:56 PM |
| 2 | Years later and still as relevant as ever. Karen Straughan's response to "those aren't real feminists". You're right, you're the real feminist making anonymous, feel good comments about how true feminism is equality. So what about those with consequential power and influence?Karen, and presumably the likes of Hannah Wallen, Alison Tieman, Erin Pizzey, and Anne Cools ... have been some of the most effective and the most steadfast MRAs Absolutely true. Here, long ago, I suggested an award for such women: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/39z669/womens_recognition_award/ Emphatically, criticism of their personal lives is unwarranted and counter-productive. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/21 02:38 PM |
| 10 | Years later and still as relevant as ever. Karen Straughan's response to "those aren't real feminists". You're right, you're the real feminist making anonymous, feel good comments about how true feminism is equality. So what about those with consequential power and influence?It is a bit random as to who gets the best opportunity to promote a cause. Which in this case it is her. Not always random. In Karen's case, not random at all but the result of her astute analysis, her dedication, and her hard work. Did you organise an ICMI? She is 100 times more popular with YT views and is welcome on media interviews without being attacked (men are attacked even by so-called MRA's). She got fundraising to go on trips. Fundraising isn't easy. She deserves credit for bringing th… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/21 02:34 PM |
| 13 | Years later and still as relevant as ever. Karen Straughan's response to "those aren't real feminists". You're right, you're the real feminist making anonymous, feel good comments about how true feminism is equality. So what about those with consequential power and influence?The criticism of Karen is unwarranted. She did not come by her prominence randomly. She reached prominence through understanding of the issues, well-researched advocacy, and hard work. Her contributions to the movement have been enormous. She deserves accolades, not personal criticism. (Of course, disagreement about details of individual issues is legitimate debate and not personal criticism.) Contesting the direction of Western, feminist society is hard work, and many of us burn out. I don't kn… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/21 02:24 PM |
| 3 | Misandrist joke - but we can take it :-)That’s not the issue. The issue is unnecessary destruction of an innocent man’s life due to feminist Puritanism. In some situations it is impossible to find a loo. This may be in an urban area with absolutely nowhere to park, even for 5 minutes. Or a rural area with no loo for many kilometers. In most sensible countries, a male can conceal himself properly behind the car or a tree to urinate and relieve discomfort. If he is fully concealed, there should be no problem. But in some areas of the US… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 04:49 AM |
| 2 | Yahoo Main Article Today: HollabackIt's all related and current. Current feminism tries to make ordinary male courting criminal. For example, MeToo tries to tie ordinary, respectful courting to coercive or abusive behaviour. The idea of "affirmative consent" is similar. Much of courting and sexual negotiation - including consent - is non-verbal, yet affirmative consent tries to make an abuser of the male who does not receive a verbal "yes" at each step. The "1-in-5" studies reach their absurd statistical conclusions by terming or… | /r/MensRights | 21/07/21 10:13 PM |
| 5 | Men have no money; women most affected. Men have to fight and die in wars; women most affected. Men have no friends; women most affected. See the pattern?Headline: World To End Tomorrow: Women, Minorities Hardest Hit | /r/MensRights | 19/07/21 07:59 AM |
| 1 | Debunking historical misconceptions used to demonize men: Salem Witch TrialsToo many whiney as[s] male “victims” on here. You’d never know you morons live in a country where women couldn’t even vote for 60% of the countries existence. You apparently don't know that working-class white males could not vote for ~97% of human existence. Universal male suffrage did not exist until ~Jacksonian democracy in the USA of the 1830's and until the revolutions of 1848 in much of Europe. In the UK, males died by the million in WW1 before meriting universal suffrage, while females we… | /r/MensRights | 18/07/21 11:23 PM |
| 2 | Debunking historical misconceptions used to demonize men: Salem Witch TrialsExcellent post. I will defend any man who is being falsely or frivolously accused. Bravo!!!!!!!!! | /r/MensRights | 18/07/21 11:07 PM |
| 1 | Debunking historical misconceptions used to demonize men: Salem Witch TrialsI should add: Society rarely opts for holding the female responsible. Society and law also take the inconsistent and even schizophrenic position that a 13- or 14-year-old can give "evidence" which destroys lives and can decide to abort, but cannot decide to have sex in the first place. Feminism insists girls mature earlier than boys. That implies the question: Is a 13- or 14-year-old female the equivalent in maturity of a 16-year-old boy? If so, and that 16-year-old boy capable of the "sexual de… | /r/MensRights | 18/07/21 11:00 PM |
| 8 | What kinds of bias or sexism you have face as a man?You have the right to make an administrative complaint against her license. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/21 10:30 PM |
| 6 | What kinds of bias or sexism you have face as a man?Obviously, they’ve been given the courtesy of some anonymity. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/21 10:29 PM |
| 3 | What kinds of bias or sexism you have face as a man?Obviously, they’ve been given the courtesy of some anonymity. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/21 10:28 PM |
| 1 | Debunking historical misconceptions used to demonize men: Salem Witch TrialsYou’re lying. From Wiki: A group of girls ranging in age from 12 to 20 were the main accusers in the Salem witch trials. This group, of which Elizabeth Hubbard was a part, also included Ann Putnam Jr., Mary Walcott, Elizabeth “Betty” Parris, Abigail Williams, Elizabeth Booth, Mercy Lewis, and Mary Warren. ... As the trials progressed, Hubbard began instigating more and more accusations. She gave her last testimony on January 7, 1693. Records show that she filed 40 legal complaints and testified … | /r/MensRights | 18/07/21 08:47 AM |
| 1 | Debunking historical misconceptions used to demonize men: Salem Witch TrialsI’m not confused at all. You’re a misandrist liar attempting to exonerate females of murder just because they are female. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/21 08:45 AM |
| 12 | Debunking historical misconceptions used to demonize men: Salem Witch TrialsSorry, I don’t understand - What does land ownership have to do with witchcraft? Women were not so subservient if they could easily get 20 innocents murdered. Puritan women certainly learnt to read, as they were encouraged to read scripture directly. This analysis seems to contest a portrayal of Puritan women’s lives as unrelentingly oppressed and bleak: https://www.lagrange.edu/resources/pdf/citations/2011/10_Hall_History.pdf | /r/MensRights | 13/07/21 07:53 AM |
| 16 | Debunking historical misconceptions used to demonize men: Salem Witch TrialsThe Salem trials murdered 20 innocent human beings and destroyed the lives of many more in an early instance of “believe the accuser”. But lessons can be drawn. The fact of 8 or more accusers shows that multiple accusations are not proof of veracity. Three accusers were female adolescents. Their ability to bring about the deaths of those they disliked shows female power, even young. Five of the accusers were young female adults or may have been slightly “underage” due to uncertainty or ambiguity… | /r/MensRights | 13/07/21 07:49 AM |
| 1 | Automatically defending women is sexistI think, in one video, the eminent Karen Straughan speculated (perhaps in different words) that favoritism towards the female is built into the human animal. I agree. Nature had its reasons for doing so. This explains the perdurance of misandry and of female supremacy; nature wants it that way. We might nevertheless be successful fighting innate misandry. After all, other prejudices (such as racism and homophobia) have an innate component, yet have been successfully (if slowly) fought. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/21 07:20 AM |
| 1 | If she doesn’t put out on the first date kick her to the curbWhy? Courtship is just one more area in which women abuse men. It deserves discussion even if I disagree with OP’s first-date rule. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/21 12:49 AM |
| 5 | How can I teach my sister about Men's Rights?/u/Sir_Sux_Alot’s points about women’s historical participation are supported by historian Van Creveld’s book, The Privileged Sex. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ | /r/MensRights | 09/07/21 01:54 PM |
| 6 | How can I teach my sister about Men's Rights?You seem to mean first-wave as the activity a century ago, and second-wave a half-century ago. Ok. On that basis: First wave feminism was about voting rights. Not exactly. In the UK, first wave feminism was about voting rights for women but not about voting rights for working-class men, hence privilege for women. (During WW1, voting was not yet universal even among men, and the suffragette response was to demand violently the vote for women and the white feather - death abroad- for men.). In the… | /r/MensRights | 09/07/21 01:03 PM |
| 2 | Can r/MensRights start muting people that are obviously trolling? I’m not saying ban, just give a temporary mute.It does hurt. Misandrist posts are exasperating and depressing. Still, I agree with you - best to just ignore them, not try to censor. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/21 12:54 PM |
| 4 | Can r/MensRights start muting people that are obviously trolling? I’m not saying ban, just give a temporary mute.For the last time I am not sealioning. Then why are your flippers showing? | /r/MensRights | 09/07/21 12:49 PM |
| 2 | Can r/MensRights start muting people that are obviously trolling? I’m not saying ban, just give a temporary mute.OP, your point is understood, but the problem is the word “obviously”. It’s not always obvious who is or is not trolling or sealioning vs genuine debate. My suggestion: At first, assume the opponent honest and engage in debate. Then, if debate goes nowhere and seems pointless, drop it. Remember, there’s no rule requiring you to respond ad infinitum to every comment. Just walk away. Muting trolls would take considerable mod time and would risk putting a damper on honest, useful debate. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/21 12:45 PM |
| 3 | How can I teach my sister about Men's Rights?There are female MRA's and allies of mens rights. Yes, a few dozen, while the planet has several billion women. I have even suggested awards for those few dozen: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/39z669/womens_recognition_award/ | /r/MensRights | 09/07/21 01:09 AM |
| 8 | How can I teach my sister about Men's Rights?Feminism was never about equality. Feminism was always about privilege without responsibility - for example, the right to vote without the responsibilities of conscription and supporting the family and risking life in mining or construction. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/21 12:49 AM |
| 4 | How can I teach my sister about Men's Rights?And yes, you're all incels or at the very least misogynists. Nonsense. You’re a hate-filled piece of - and cannot provide a substantive answer to MRAs, so you drool invective. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/21 12:48 AM |
| 5 | How can I teach my sister about Men's Rights?Sure, first and second wave feminism was about equality. Feminism was never about equality. Feminism was always about privilege without responsibility - for example, the right to vote without the responsibilities of conscription and supporting the family and risking life in mining or construction. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/21 12:44 AM |
| 1 | How can I teach my sister about Men's Rights?Imitate Jordan Peterson’s handling of Cathy Newman. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/21 12:39 AM |
| 2 | Why is it that if you suggest men have needs in relationships you are a villain?You are both and obviously consider men subhuman. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/21 04:09 PM |
| 3 | Why is it that if you suggest men have needs in relationships you are a villain?You’re correct but wasting your time and effort. /u/throwawayyo27890 is obviously a troll and a dyed-in-the-wool misandrist. Correcting her lies about the Cosby case is fruitless. She reverts to repeating the lies within seconds. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/21 03:52 PM |
| 1 | Why this so called 'cancel culture' target straight Males?Haven't you missed your brother, Torquemada? | /r/MensRights | 05/07/21 03:20 PM |
| 1 | Female reporters in the male locker room. How is this not 100% ILLEGAL?The current situation is the result of legal action by a female sports reporter, Lisa Olson, and her employer, the Boston Herald. In my opinion, Olson, the Boston Herald, the league management, and the judge in the case conspired to legalise visual rape of male players. I had intended to write up the case in a post as an example of feminist criminality and Orwellian feminist revision of history. I found very few descriptions currently visible on the internet which recounted the facts truthfully … | /r/MensRights | 05/07/21 03:05 PM |
| 2 | Why this so called 'cancel culture' target straight Males?People like you have manipulated definitions and moved the goalposts so far that anything not in line with modern progressive ideology is grounds to be cancelled. You’re correct and have stated it well. | /r/MensRights | 03/07/21 10:13 PM |
| 2 | Why this so called 'cancel culture' target straight Males?Nonsense. Your “cancel culture” imposes an ideological straight jacket as severe and twisted as Maoism - and similarly destroys lives. | /r/MensRights | 03/07/21 10:11 PM |
| 5 | Why this so called 'cancel culture' target straight Males?I don’t see the issue. Cancel culture threatens everyone, but white males are particularly vulnerable. You are correct, but so is OP. | /r/MensRights | 03/07/21 05:59 PM |
| 5 | Bill Cosby And The Incoherence Of American LiberalismThanks to OP for an excellent article. | /r/MensRights | 03/07/21 02:45 AM |
| 1 | What should I say to my feminist (&misandrist) gf?What should I say to my feminist (&misandrist) gf? “Goodbye.” | /r/MensRights | 03/07/21 01:39 AM |
| 2 | Remember every single feminist statistic is a lie.The 2% stat is a fabrication by Brownmiller, with pretext of a speech by a professional friend etc. https://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2013/01/a-lie-told-often-enough/ https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2216&context=llr Debunking that (oft-misrepresented) FBI 8% stat: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4w1z94/information_about_fbi_8_unfounded_accusation/ | /r/MensRights | 02/07/21 05:12 AM |
| 1 | OK who decided to delete the post about Cosby?It means he cannot point to some of the women having clearly said yes or no, in writing or verbally. But that's the flawed logic of "affirmative consent". 99% of joyful, consensual sex between long-married, loving partners does not have an explicit "yes" either. The fact remains that the women sought the presence of, and probably expected career help from, a famous and rich man. That makes it quite possible their intent was to exchange sex for drugs and said career help. It also makes it quite p… | /r/MensRights | 02/07/21 01:12 AM |
| 3 | OK who decided to delete the post about Cosby?I assume cosby guilty because after looking at the evidence, he was convicted guilty. That's a foolish assumption. The Innocence Project has exonerated hundreds of falsely-convicted innocents. In our feminist societies, innocent men are penalised daily in cases of false accusation of everything from DV to rape to harassment. In any one country alone, the numbers are massive; Spain alone has a gendered DV law which has targeted an estimated one million men or more, 90% without evidence and likely… | /r/MensRights | 02/07/21 12:57 AM |
| 3 | OK who decided to delete the post about Cosby?Sorry, he didn’t confess to raping women. He “confessed” to exchanging recreational drugs for consensual sex. | /r/MensRights | 02/07/21 12:32 AM |
| 5 | OK who decided to delete the post about Cosby?Sorry, you’re the threat to the movement. You assume Cosby guilty when the case is weak and clearly politicised. You attack another MRA, /u/DavidByron2 for patiently trying to point out the flaws in the “evidence”. Godwin's law implies you've lost the argument. And, in my opinion, your rush to stab another MRA in the back indicates a character even more despicable than Cosby's. Cosby's misbehaviour may well be limited to having "bought" consensual sex by providing drugs to willing young women wh… | /r/MensRights | 02/07/21 12:29 AM |
| 2 | Callers to hotline for male domestic violence victims report mostly female perpetrators, study says. Male victims face unique forms of abuse, such as legal aggression, parental alienation and false allegations.Excellent. Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 05:12 PM |
| 11 | Callers to hotline for male domestic violence victims report mostly female perpetrators, study says. Male victims face unique forms of abuse, such as legal aggression, parental alienation and false allegations.Indeed. It’s one of the mechanisms society provides women to help them enforce male submission. About DV against men, here’s a bibliography of ~286 supporting studies: https://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 12:19 PM |
| 1 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outsworn testimony of 60 women Anybody can swear to anything. For example, I could write an affidavit asserting you’ve a brain, but that wouldn’t make it true. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 12:14 PM |
| 0 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outThe problem with the 51/60 is that their testimony isn’t independent and so not probative: Constand contacted 13 others. The remainder saw the publicity. That means all of them had a chance to adapt their testimony. That’s not really the same level of proof were they to have made similar accusations with no knowledge of each other. Also, they’ve strong motive to lie both in Cosby’s $400m, and in revenge for his possibly promising them career advancement for consensual sex but then dumping them. … | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 11:58 AM |
| 1 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outThe problem with the 51/60 is that their testimony isn’t independent and so not probative. Constand contacted 13 others. The remainder saw the publicity. That means all of them had a chance to adapt their testimony. That’s not really the same level of proof were they to have made similar accusations with no knowledge of each other. Furthermore, they’ve strong motive to lie both in Cosby’s $400m, and in revenge for his possibly promising them career advancement for consensual sex but then dumping… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 11:43 AM |
| 0 | Sad that so many so-called MRA's believe feminist lies so quickly and throw Cosby under the bus. Sorry to tell you, but feminists lie. Newspapers repeat those lies. Cosby is hardly the first; this happens all the time.No, he’s saying my comment is sexist and ungallant and so better omitted. But Cosby was and is world-famous, with a net worth of $400 million. He had no need to take risks to have all the consensual sex he wanted with the planet’s most beautiful women. Yes, there are indeed men who rape old ladies. But appearance isn’t completely irrelevant. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 11:21 AM |
| 0 | Sad that so many so-called MRA's believe feminist lies so quickly and throw Cosby under the bus. Sorry to tell you, but feminists lie. Newspapers repeat those lies. Cosby is hardly the first; this happens all the time.I stopped reading ... Your loss. You may not like my reference to her appearance, but the other points remain valid. Maybe you found a pretext to cover your lack of a substantive response. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 11:13 AM |
| 1 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outYou are making inferences unwarranted by his exact words. He admitted only to providing drugs for voluntary, recreational use in exchange for consensual sex. Even the NYT, upon review of the deposition, saw only seduction: https://archive.is/Iu4fe | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 02:13 AM |
| 1 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outHe said he gave women drugs for sex. He did not say he had sex while they were passed out. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 02:02 AM |
| 1 | Can we add 'The privileged sex' by Martin Van Creveld to the reading list?Which trials? | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 02:00 AM |
| 1 | Can we add 'The privileged sex' by Martin Van Creveld to the reading list?MR reading lists should have not only Martin Van Creveld but also Joanne Bailey Begiato, Lucrezia Marinella, and Nathanson-Young. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ Van Creveld reviews the rarely-mentioned privileges women have received throughout history. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:57 AM |
| 1 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outHe didn’t clearly confess. He admitted to providing drugs openly, in exchange for sex. He did not admit providing drugs surreptitiously, nor did he admit to non-consensual sex. Look at his exact words. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:49 AM |
| 4 | Sad that so many so-called MRA's believe feminist lies so quickly and throw Cosby under the bus. Sorry to tell you, but feminists lie. Newspapers repeat those lies. Cosby is hardly the first; this happens all the time./u/DavidByron2 is correct. Stripped of the hype, the “evidence” against Cosby was weak: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6gp5u8/questions_about_cosby/ | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:46 AM |
| 0 | Bill Cosby freed from prison, his sex conviction overturned.The comments here notwithstanding, there are many questions raising doubt about Cosby’s guilt: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6gp5u8/questions_about_cosby/ | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:44 AM |
| 1 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outI don’t know if he’s innocent, but the evidence was weak. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6gp5u8/questions_about_cosby/ | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:39 AM |
| 0 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outBut you are citing a paraphrase. Look at his exact words. He did not admit to providing drugs surreptitiously, nor did he admit the sex non-consensual. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:36 AM |
| 1 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outNo, he didn’t. Please show his exact words. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:33 AM |
| 1 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outThe top comment does not prove his guilt. It explains the conviction overturned on procedural grounds, with no evaluation of guilt or innocence. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:33 AM |
| 2 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outHe never admitted guilt. Look at his exact words, which admit the interpretation of providing recreational drugs in exchange for consensual sex. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:30 AM |
| 1 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outIn none of your articles does he admit to surreptitiously drugging them. He admits to providing drugs but the women were entirely aware. In none of your articles does he admit the exchange (of drugs for sex) non-consensual. In those days, it was commonplace for some women to exchange sex for drugs. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:28 AM |
| 1 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outIt is a men’s rights issue. He was rich and had connections. How do we know the women did not get involved with him consensually (including taking recreational drugs when proffered) in exchange for, or in hope of, his providing them money or career advancement, only to then be dumped after the consensual sex? That would leave many people bitter enough to make a false accusation. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:23 AM |
| 1 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outI again pose some of the questions I raised at the time: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6gp5u8/questions_about_cosby/ | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:13 AM |
| 3 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outSorry, please produce his exact words in confession. In his civil deposition, he admitted providing drugs but did not admit assault. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:09 AM |
| 2 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outwas forced to admit under oath at depositions to giving multiple women Quaaludes before he sexually assaulted them, and even said he gave Costand multiple Benadryl before he assaulted her. Not exactly. As I remember, he admitted to providing them recreational drugs in exchange for sex. He did not admit to assault nor to anything non-consensual. For confirmation either way, we need to examine his exact words in the deposition. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:07 AM |
| 0 | Bill Cosby to be released from prison -- conviction thrown outJuries can make mistakes. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:03 AM |
| 3 | My list of studies showing we care more about women than men.This is excellent! Thank you, OP! | /r/MensRights | 11/05/21 02:03 PM |
| 2 | Men of reddit feminist are always talking about how much more expensive it is to be a woman so i wondered what is more expensive about being male?what is more expensive about being male? Men pay the majority of taxes, while women draw the majority of benefits. Men pay into pension schemes yet derive 5 years less of benefits, as they pass away on average 5 years earlier. In some countries (such as, until recently, the UK and Israel), women may retire 5 years earlier than men, exacerbating the inequality in pensions. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/21 04:44 PM |
| 1 | I was abused and given no help, says man refused a get (a Jewish divorce document)OP's situation is just the tip of the iceberg. In gender issues, Jewish and Israeli men seem to fare particularly badly. https://rtd.rt.com/films/no-woman-no-crime/ See especially at 11:20: In this gender war, women have yet another powerful weapon. By order of the General Prosecution [Attorney General] in Israel, it's forbidden to prosecute an alleged sexual abuse victim for falsifying evidence. So, in fact, a woman can slander any man she wants with impunity. 'Either I put him in prison, or he… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/21 04:39 PM |
| 2 | I can't fucking take it anymore.I don't know where to post this, and hope its allowed here, but I can't fucking cope anymore with this [misandrist] society, with this [anti-male] hysteria. I dont even know how to describe my feeling other than the fact I feel marginalized, I feel ostrasicted, I feel emasculated, I feel like Im not respected, valued, I feel like I have no dignity. Welcome to the club! Here is the answer I gave a similar young man a short while ago: Welcome to the club! As any mistreated minority (yes, men are a… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/21 04:30 PM |
| 5 | Fear my daughter is about to make serious, false allegations about meHi. You have my sympathy. In my non-expert opinion: Your daughter is already permanently lost to you, through parental alienation by the mother and her family but through no fault of your own. You must now think of her as a dangerous stranger and consult experienced, pro-male legal counsel as to how to best protect yourself. It is possible that, in the future, you may need to rely upon your other two children as witnesses in your defence. Some thought is needed as to how you might prepare them f… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/21 04:20 PM |
| 3 | A warning for men planning to use Fathers4Justice (from a woman!)This post defames F4J and should be taken down: F4J's position was not unreasonable. Fathers deserve equality. The custody system is misandrist, wrong, and evil, attacking F4J just because it is pro-male, and wrongly equating the "best interests of the baby girl" with the best interests of the mother. OP is practically, morally, and ethically wrong to blame F4J rather than the twisted custody system. I wonder if OP's intentions are above-board. Alternately stated, it is in the best interests of … | /r/MensRights | 09/05/21 01:06 AM |
| 1 | U.S. and Israel interfering in Denmark's proposals to ban male genital mutilation on boys under the age of 18.Now, DR Nyheder has gained access to documents that shed light on the lead up to Mette Frederiksen’s decision. It’s wasn’t just a question of domestic policy, but of international relations. This language gives the incorrect impression that only the PM is involved, and that "Frederiksen's decision" has dictatorial power. But Parliament (Folketing) is involved. The article wants to demonise those big, bad Americans and Israelis. But I'm not so sure a few comments by Americans and Israelis capable… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/21 09:22 AM |
| 1 | U.S. and Israel interfering in Denmark's proposals to ban male genital mutilation on boys under the age of 18.Intactivists would do their cause a favour by perfecting the medical arguments (including my own advocacy of a botch registry) and leaving behind the "Jewish influence" claims. Decent people recognise antisemtism and run from it. Matthew Hess was having moderate success with his anti-circumcision activities when he made the mistake of dragging in the Jews. It got his anti-circumcision motion dropped from the Santa Monica ballot: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/woman-pushing-to-ban-circumcision-… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/21 08:52 AM |
| 1 | The first thing that happens to men after birth is their masculinity is attackedYou're right that smegma per se is not particularly harmful. However: If you re-read my words, you'll see the warm, dark, moist environment of more concern than the smegma. Ancient societies certainly had less sophisticated means of hygiene, and so smegma buildup was likely commonplace. The smell alone would have put off ancients. Circumcision was and is commonplace even absent religious motivation. The hygiene rationale - even if mistaken - would certainly have been a motivation. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/21 08:24 AM |
| 1 | The first thing that happens to men after birth is their masculinity is attackedSorry, you're still wrong. Neonatal circumcision is commonplace in Australia and Canada. Australia: https://circinfo.org/statistics.html The vast majority of circumcisions in Australia have always been performed routinely on infants. Canada: http://www.circlist.com/rites/ritesimages/canada2007.png http://www.circlist.com/rites/canada.html We can see that there are huge differences between provinces. Circumcision rates in Alberta and Ontario were around 44%, while two provinces, Nova Scotia and N… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/21 07:50 AM |
| 2 | The first thing that happens to men after birth is their masculinity is attackedI agree, generally. But there is a fly in the ointment. Scientifically, fluid flow does not stop instantaneously. That means a drop of excess, increasing slightly for each decade of age. Most men - even the most fastidious - do not usually wipe the glans after using a urinal; the liquid keeps the glans and area moist. If circumcised, at least that liquid is usually absorbed by the clothing. The moist, warm, enclosed area is very unhealthy. Enough to justify circumcision? Arguable either way. Wou… | /r/MensRights | 22/04/21 06:55 PM |
| 0 | U.S. and Israel interfering in Denmark's proposals to ban male genital mutilation on boys under the age of 18.You're right. The comment is just a variation of this racist theme: https://www.csustan.edu/sites/default/files/honors/documents/journals/thresholds/Farhadian.pdf | /r/MensRights | 22/04/21 06:16 PM |
| 0 | U.S. and Israel interfering in Denmark's proposals to ban male genital mutilation on boys under the age of 18.Well Jews are in a lot of positions of power and very influential globally. This comment is racist and factually false and should be taken down. Globally, countries of high circumcision rates: Philippines - Over 100m population - few Jews S Korea - Over 51m population - few Jews Muslim world - Over 1.4 billion population - few Jews Africa - about 9 million circumcisions annually - few Jews Especially when it comes to America though. Wrong again. Check: http://www.cirp.org/library/general/laumann… | /r/MensRights | 22/04/21 06:12 PM |
| 1 | The first thing that happens to men after birth is their masculinity is attackedOh yeah, in an outdated belief to reduce the amount of pleasure men can feel. That's one of the pretexts, but probably not the primary one. The primary rationale - perhaps valid at one time - was one of health in societies without modern hygiene. That is, in ancient societies, a moist, dark, enclosed environment and/or smegma may have been thought conducive to infection, etc. That rationale no longer exists in advanced societies. I suspect "reducing pleasure" to be an after-the-fact pretext for … | /r/MensRights | 22/04/21 05:39 PM |
| 1 | The first thing that happens to men after birth is their masculinity is attackedIt's basically Jews, Americans, and a small number of Muslims Not correct. Check out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_circumcision https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/circumcision-by-country Countries and territories where the prevalence of male circumcision is above 99% are Afghanistan, Iran, Comoros, Gabon, Gambia, the Gaza strip, Mauritania, Morocco, Tajikistan, Tunisia, West Bank, Western Sahara, and Yemen. Prevalence above 90% is seen in Israel, the Philippines, A… | /r/MensRights | 22/04/21 05:19 PM |
| 1 | High-school boys made to stand and apologise for being maleIt's just that I, unlike a "terrorist", interpret it contextually NOT literally Exactly! Most Christians do not "pluck out (an) eye". The key to adopting the morality of most religions without adopting fanaticism is understanding the words not literally but figuratively, and interpreting by context. | /r/MensRights | 22/04/21 04:44 PM |
| 2 | Hating men is “a source of joy,” feminist saysNearly 40 years later, 26-year-old French feminist and writer Pauline Harmange has, like Russ (and others both before and after her), attempted to rescue misandry, or the hatred of men, from its pointed hat and broomstick associations and understand it not as an aberration, joke or liability but as a logical human response to oppression and inequality. Her 80-page essay, originally published in France in August 2020 as ‘Moi les hommes, je les déteste’ (I Hate Men), makes the modest proposal that… | /r/MensRights | 22/04/21 04:24 PM |
| 2 | Hating men is “a source of joy,” feminist saysfucking Maybe not. Maybe that's the problem. Maybe she just needs to get laid. | /r/MensRights | 22/04/21 04:18 PM |
| 4 | Internalized misandrySo, basically, whole post consists of ptojection and generalization. And generally, you’re an idiot. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/21 10:19 PM |
| 2 | High-school boys made to stand and apologise for being maleYou sound like a reformist Muslim. We need a lot more like you! | /r/MensRights | 26/03/21 06:12 AM |
| 1 | Journalist Defends Woody Allen, Terms Woke Blacklist/MeToo a "Reign of Terror"Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/21 05:07 AM |
| 1 | Strong, independent, intelligent and empowered women are found everywhere except in divorce courts.Please answer this: From time immemorial, men have been concerned with women's welfare. For example, rape has always been considered a horrible crime - even if the male could sometimes play upon social status to get away with it. Turnabout, how many women raise their voices to object to society's indifference to significant differences in longevity? Damn few. And a 5-year difference times 3.5 billion men is a massive number of man-years of earlier death women owe men. Yes, "women owe men". It is… | /r/MensRights | 24/03/21 04:11 AM |
| 1 | Strong, independent, intelligent and empowered women are found everywhere except in divorce courts.I am telling you to stop Who appointed you grand poobah of censorship? I am not attempting to censor men Yes, you are. The feminist war on men emits thousands of generalisations daily and has even recommended "culling". In the face of that, any generalised assertion that women treat men abominably, is mild and true. As for proof, it is right before your nose. Among other indicators: My own list of women speaking up for men - posted years ago - is accurate but very short: https://old.reddit.com/r… | /r/MensRights | 23/03/21 11:41 PM |
| 0 | Strong, independent, intelligent and empowered women are found everywhere except in divorce courts.People like you are the reason Male advocacy is laughed at and made a mockery of. Nonsense. Male advocacy has been battling headwinds for centuries regardless of how it expresses itself, because the human animal has been created by nature to instinctively favour the female. Women, especially, favour the female. https://www.purdue.edu/uns/html4ever/2004/041213.Goodwin.gender.html The results showed that women showed in-group favoritism four times greater than men. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Privile… | /r/MensRights | 23/03/21 11:35 PM |
| 3 | Strong, independent, intelligent and empowered women are found everywhere except in divorce courts.Sorry, you’re both hiding you heads in the sand. The situation of men would not be so dire if women didn’t want it and adamantly refuse to give up their privileges, just as - at one time - most whites refused. Even worse than racism, women’s anti-male attitudes may be instinctive and innate. Further, Western societies have recognised the evil of racism. In contrast, only a tiny handful of women seem to recognise and be willing to fight misandry. Your rejection of the truth makes remedy harder or… | /r/MensRights | 23/03/21 02:47 PM |
| 6 | Strong, independent, intelligent and empowered women are found everywhere except in divorce courts.What if our generalisations are mostly true and theirs are mostly not? Stop trying to think. It won’t work, and you’ll hurt yourself. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/21 12:05 PM |
| 4 | Strong, independent, intelligent and empowered women are found everywhere except in divorce courts.The objective of your nitpicking is to obstruct any progress for men. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/21 11:52 AM |
| 14 | Strong, independent, intelligent and empowered women are found everywhere except in divorce courts.they are ALL victims who survived abuse True - because their definition of abuse is disagreeing with a woman’s demands. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/21 11:51 AM |
| 11 | Strong, independent, intelligent and empowered women are found everywhere except in divorce courts.Some of whom had a history of abuse and fought their way out of toxic relationships. I agree wholeheartedly. Marriage today is, by definition and design, legally toxic - to men. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/21 11:48 AM |
| 2 | Apparently the rapist stat is 1 in 16 men, I don’t believe that for one second.Indeed. Is “white feather” a reference to suffragettes’ white feather campaign? If so, they’ve blood on their hands. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/21 11:40 AM |
| 1 | Apparently the rapist stat is 1 in 16 men, I don’t believe that for one second.The site is bull. Separately, in discussion here about stats, please remember the rate of false reports and the rate of unreported true rapes are two independent stats. Suppose, in a jurisdiction, 50 individuals are raped and report it. 50 individuals are raped and do not report it. 50 individuals are not raped but report/claim a rape. Then the rate of non-reporting and the rate of false reporting are simultaneously 50%. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/21 11:38 AM |
| 2 | Domestic Violence Awareness Australia openly takes the stance of anti-feminism and calls out feminist dishonesty!Is it actually an MR site? | /r/MensRights | 23/03/21 11:24 AM |
| 3 | The problem with the term "Patriarchy"there are also parts of society where women are advantaged over men that get overlooked Historian Martin Van Creveld’s Book, The Privileged Sex, is a thorough look at those rarely-discussed advantages throughout human history. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/21 08:46 AM |
| 3 | [Australia] Greens plan to introduce Enthusiastic Consent Bill in New South WalesBoth Quillette and Karen Straughan (/u/girlwriteswhat) have suggested it innate to human society to favour the female. Here is the Quillette article: https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/ https://archive.is/TcUVS Karen - astute as always - made her comments in a video. I would go further. Men's problems are not simply the result of modern feminism. Men's problems may stem from nature, which - for whatever reasons - seems to have built into society, into men, and into w… | /r/MensRights | 21/03/21 12:53 AM |
| 1 | My sisters are sexist and it’s really bugging meThe reason this happens is that feminism's guiding principle is not equality. Feminism's guiding principle is, "The female is always right. The male is always wrong." | /r/MensRights | 15/03/21 01:48 PM |
| 1 | Times of London vs Jordan PetersonGreat! Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/21 01:45 PM |
| 1 | Times of London vs Jordan PetersonIt's behind The Times' paywall: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/jordan-peterson-depression-drug-dependency-daughter-mikhaila-rehab-russia-0xtz2ph32 | /r/MensRights | 12/03/21 03:08 AM |
| 2 | Farrow-Allen: Docuseries Revives Already-Debunked False AccusationsYou really are a piece of work, aren't you? You peddle defamatory lies about Allen, which make clear you know little about the case and have not bothered to look at the detail. You jump to false conclusions about Allen. When confronted with your errors, you do not bother to re-investigate, but instead descend to ad hominem abuse of the messenger (myself). I even gave a list of issues, on this and related threads. You obviously didn't take the trouble to investigate any of them, even when I gave … | /r/MensRights | 10/03/21 05:54 PM |
| 1 | Farrow-Allen: Docuseries Revives Already-Debunked False Accusations/u/DaBlockObama is not correct. Soon-Yi may have met Allen at 10 but never spent significant time with him until adult at university at the age of 19 or 21. See my list above - just a start - or others' debunking of the Farrow-Allen false accusation farce, including Soon-Yi's own words at https://www.vulture.com/2018/09/soon-yi-previn-speaks.html. For further refutation of these and other false accusations against Allen, see also: https://woodyallenmoblynching.com/ https://www.worldofreel.com/bl… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/21 05:15 PM |
| 2 | Farrow-Allen: Docuseries Revives Already-Debunked False AccusationsYou're wrong many times over. Soon-Yi Previn is the adoptive daughter of Farrow and Previn - unless you're trying to claim she has two adoptive fathers. In fact, Allen never adopted her. Allen was never involved in raising her. While he dated Farrow, he and Farrow lived on opposite sides of town, and he never stayed over. The only interaction ever, was Allen's kindly helping Soon-Yi when she broke her ankle. (From the sound of it, Mia was nowhere to be found.) By the admission of all parties, Al… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/21 04:59 PM |
| 2 | Farrow-Allen: Docuseries Revives Already-Debunked False AccusationsBut I’m not too bothered by false accusations against guilty men. Unless you're waxing brilliantly sarcastic, you're either a troll or a monster: There is no accusation, much less proof, of any other molestation by Allen. Yet you assume guilt, in violation of every principle of modern jurisprudence. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/21 03:15 PM |
| 22 | My sisters are sexist and it’s really bugging me"men are taught to not share their feelings" Men do share their feelings but are actively discouraged from doing so: Female: You should share your feelings more. Male: I feel women - especially feminists - often mistreat men. Female: Your feelings are invalid, and you're a sexist, misogynist pig. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/21 11:00 AM |
| 9 | My sisters are sexist and it’s really bugging meBrava, /u/dekaNLover! | /r/MensRights | 10/03/21 10:56 AM |
| 2 | My sisters are sexist and it’s really bugging me“You have no idea what it’s like to be a woman” but yet she thought it was completely fine for her to prejudge what it’s like to be a man. You're right. I further claim too many women accept this self-centered view - only women's experience counts - without ever posing the obvious questions about men's experience. One exception is journalist Norah Vincent, who spent a year disguised as a man: https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/16532.Norah_Vincent https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-Made_Man_(b… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/21 10:54 AM |
| 18 | Why is toxic femininity never discussed?They make the rules. Long-time MRA Jack Kammer wrote a funny but true book, If Men Have All the Power How Come Women Make the Rules? It's free in pdf form, but I bought the paperback just to support Jack: PDF: http://www.revolucionantifeminista.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/how-can-women-make-the-rules.pdf Paperback: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Have-Power-Come-Women-Rules/dp/1453800379 | /r/MensRights | 09/03/21 10:39 AM |
| 1 | "How come that cute guy won't ask me out" and the minefield created by #metoo.All very true! | /r/MensRights | 07/03/21 04:13 PM |
| 3 | An example of feminist historical revisionism: "the rule of thumb" as a legalized form of wife abuse never really existed and was instead fabricated by feministsUS President Theodore Roosevelt favoured continuation of the whipping post for wife-beaters: https://cdn.loc.gov/service/pnp/cph/3g10000/3g10000/3g10000/3g10086r.jpg Whipping was used to punish wife-beaters until the mid-20th-century: https://cecilcountyhistory.com/an-ancient-punishment-the-whipping-post/ | /r/MensRights | 07/03/21 09:18 AM |
| 1 | "How come that cute guy won't ask me out" and the minefield created by #metoo.All over social media Me Too females say the perfect guy is one who will "change to suit them." Indeed. Yet a man who gives in too easily is not considered sexy. Women seem to want a macho man and to complain about their macho man. It puts the male in the position of damned-if-do, damned-if-don't. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/21 09:08 AM |
| 1 | "How come that cute guy won't ask me out" and the minefield created by #metoo.Sorry, you're wrong. Some men like yourself are so handsome and virile that they find all the women they want. But most men have to expend effort courting. We learn it from older brothers or from movies or just watching people. We eventually succeed, but with effort and even suffering. And some ugly or inept men can't get the hang of it at all and spend their lives miserably lonely. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/21 05:24 PM |
| 5 | "How come that cute guy won't ask me out" and the minefield created by #metoo.That's a subject of dispute. Laura Kipnis raised objections to the overly-Puritan taboo against superior-subordinate, and for her trouble was accused of harassment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Kipnis#Writings_about_sexual_harassment_policies The Anglo countries seem most subject to such Puritanism. Most developed countries think it insane. There is a double standard - when a woman like Tamara Rojo finds herself a lover among subordinates, she gets away with it. Many people have little ti… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/21 05:09 PM |
| 2 | Police dropped case, so they named him anyway!Your argument on the limited issue of conviction would be sound except for these details: You assume rates of the various case characteristics and dispositions remain the same for both true and false accusations when mixed. The NCVS assumes respondent information can be taken at face value - that affirmative answers are truthful and not (for example) self-serving expression of regret rather than assault. And here you ignore reality: If women made false accusations against you the chances are tha… | /r/MensRights | 25/02/21 02:50 PM |
| 1 | Farrow-Allen Case: False Accusations Live ForeverWhat a load of defamatory codswallop you spew! Woody is in the same boat as Michael Jackson for me. Sorry, they are two distinctly different cases with distinctly different fact patterns. There's thousands of celebrities that live normal lives and you don't hear anything about them. Al Pacino for instance - everyone knows who he is, can you tell me how many kids he has? Is he married? Him, like 99% of celebrities live regularly normal lives and there are no random false accusations. So notoriety… | /r/MensRights | 25/02/21 06:52 AM |
| 3 | Police dropped case, so they named him anyway!the vast majority of fale rape accusations don't make it to trial because of a lack of evidence Proof? | /r/MensRights | 25/02/21 01:17 AM |
| 11 | Police dropped case, so they named him anyway!If women made false accusations against you the chances are that it won't stick Sorry, you're delirious. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/21 06:58 PM |
| 1 | Title IX Will Become a Vehicle of More Injustice | Wendy McElroyas Sokolow stated in a phone interview, “Probably 40 or 50% of allegations of sexual assault are baseless..." | /r/MensRights | 08/02/21 10:38 AM |
| 1 | Ocasio-Cortez Lays It On ThickFalse accusations are often prosecuted as crimes but are not. Don't try to think too hard. You cannot do it, and it would ruin your day. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/21 01:42 PM |
| 6 | Times of London vs Jordan Petersonhttps://archive.is/GoEJK | /r/MensRights | 04/02/21 01:40 PM |
| 2 | Ocasio-Cortez Lays It On ThickThere have long been reports that trauma continues to layer over time and it can make traumatic events even more traumatic. Bullshit. Rape is the only "crime" with more than 40% of false accusations. The reason for your complaints is to ensure those 40% get no scrutiny. I wish AOC well in her recovery from the incident at the capital as well as any past issues she may be dealing with. I don't. She makes up things for her convenience, including an accusation of attemped murder to try to silence a… | /r/MensRights | 03/02/21 12:39 AM |
| 3 | Ocasio-Cortez Lays It On ThickIn my opinion, Ocasio-Cortez is engaging in crybullying: She exaggerates the physical danger to herself. Why do so many public females - whether politician or actress - eventually come up with a tale of "survivorship"? I think she is probably lying through her teeth. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/21 06:55 PM |
| 5 | Debunking the Idea that false rape accusations are rare. (MUST READ)/u/TalosGB is correct. Many ostensibly authoritative reports fiddle the figures for political purposes, using deceptive definitions, the Mary Koss methods, and other meretricious approaches. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/21 01:48 PM |
| 2 | Debunking the Idea that false rape accusations are rare. (MUST READ)In other words, you’ve no proof. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/21 01:44 PM |
| 2 | Debunking the Idea that false rape accusations are rare. (MUST READ)The Kanin and other studies show the false allegation rate to be 40% or greater. To return justice to the process: Oath-on-oath cases should be disallowed: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9jlab3/why_all_oathonoath_proceedings_fordkavanaugh_are/ Provably false allegations should be treated as attempted rape (of the accused by the false accuser) or even as attempted murder. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/21 01:37 PM |
| 2 | Debunking the Idea that false rape accusations are rare. (MUST READ)I don’t trust the Beeb, but worth reading: “Does India have a problem with false rape claims?” https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-38796457 | /r/MensRights | 24/01/21 01:29 PM |
| 1 | Debunking the Idea that false rape accusations are rare. (MUST READ)The FBI figures are generally misrepresented: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4w1z94/information_about_fbi_8_unfounded_accusation/ | /r/MensRights | 24/01/21 09:44 AM |
| 2 | Study: Women leaders did NOT do better at handling COVID and the reason it was claimed was due to sexism: hyper-focusing on good women, ignoring bad women, hyper focusing on bad men, ignoring good men (the study is generous, women leaders actually did significantly worse)Relevant links including the study: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kor1p4/study_women_leaders_did_not_do_better_at_handling/ghxtkus/ | /r/MensRights | 03/01/21 11:57 AM |
| 2 | Study: Women leaders did NOT do better at handling COVID and the reason it was claimed was due to sexism: hyper-focusing on good women, ignoring bad women, hyper focusing on bad men, ignoring good men (the study is generous, women leaders actually did significantly worse)Feminism has a habit of manufacturing false statistics which take on a life of their own: 1 in 5: "One in five women on college campuses have been sexually assaulted." 77 cents: Barack Obama ad (June 21, 2012) said women are paid "77 cents on the dollar for doing the same work as men". Company growth: Women spur company growth Now, an economics propaganda pair named Garikipati & Kambhampati) have just supplied the bogus "proof" that women leaders have handled Covid better. Here are some links re… | /r/MensRights | 03/01/21 11:38 AM |
| 2 | I’m starting to feel a deep seeded hatred form in me and it’s driving me nutshttps://www.statista.com/statistics/737923/us-population-by-gender/ | /r/MensRights | 29/12/20 04:01 AM |
| 5 | I’m starting to feel a deep seeded hatred form in me and it’s driving me nutsFeminism has a lot of great values. In its earlier forms they did some great work for equality and I would have called myself a feminist back then. Excuse me, but feminism has never been about equality, only about privilege. | /r/MensRights | 25/12/20 08:22 PM |
| 3 | I’m starting to feel a deep seeded hatred form in me and it’s driving me nutsBravo! Thank you for your support, and please continue to support us and to stick to your convictions despite the rabid opposition. | /r/MensRights | 25/12/20 08:20 PM |
| 7 | I’m starting to feel a deep seeded hatred form in me and it’s driving me nutsTake a look at the swastika. It was originally a Chinese (I think) symbol for peace "Swastika" originates in Sanskrit. It reached wide usage in the Indian sub-continent approximately 2500 to 5000 years ago. It is still widely used in Asian religions (Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism) and Asian cultures as a symbol of good luck, auspiciousness and prosperity. I’m starting to feel a deep seeded hatred form in me and it’s driving me nuts ... I never talk about this with my family, ever. Being 14 with a … | /r/MensRights | 25/12/20 06:58 PM |
| 2 | Joe Biden Has Vowed To Undo Betsy DeVos's Title IX Reforms. Can He?I have to say that most of the lawsuits to which I linked challenged the individual situation to attempt to obtain justice for the accused male, but did not necessarily (to my knowledge) challenge the DC letter sought justice for the individual male and so may have thought harder to include the Department of Education or Russlynn Ali or the letter itself usually targeted the academic institution disappointingly, did not join the false accuser. The lawyers advancing these unpopular cases (defendi… | /r/MensRights | 13/11/20 02:03 PM |
| 1 | Joe Biden Has Vowed To Undo Betsy DeVos's Title IX Reforms. Can He?Someone has to do that. That has not happened yet. What do you mean by "has not happened yet"? There have been well over one hundred lawsuits against universities: https://www.saveservices.org/sexual-assault/complaints-and-lawsuits/lawsuit-analysis/ By "has not happened yet", do you mean, challenge "Dear Colleague" policies as a class action if Biden reinstitutes them? | /r/MensRights | 13/11/20 05:04 AM |
| 2 | What are the arguments against "because only a small percentage of sexual assault allegations are false, it should be guilty until proven innocent"?The best argument against assumption of guilt is Blackstone's famous ratio: It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer. Another argument is the falsehood of the underlying 2%-8% stat. Claims and studies vary wildly, but the most-often-occurring numbers seem to be in the 40% to 50% range: Kanin's studies found precisely this range. Charles McDowell's studies for the US Air Force found an initial rate provably false, then examined each or the remaining claims individ… | /r/MensRights | 25/10/20 04:36 PM |
| 1 | “Central Park Karen” likely to get community service for two 911 calls falsely accusing a black man of assaulting her and threatening her dogYou are wrong: As I showed and you ignored, 53 million people have interaction with the police in one year, including 31,056,200 black. The DoJ Bureau of Justice Statistics recorded 424 deaths in a 3-month period, of which 25% were black, or (424 x 4 x .25) = 424 black deaths annually, representing one thousandth of one percent of black interactions with police. You are thus in the wrong by a factor of ten to one hundred thousand, regardless of whether you are innumerate, or instead are numerate… | /r/MensRights | 17/10/20 03:42 PM |
| 1 | “Central Park Karen” likely to get community service for two 911 calls falsely accusing a black man of assaulting her and threatening her dogYou need to seek multiple sources or to at least be skeptical of whether any particular news article represents the absolute truth. For example, ABC News is inaccurate from the get-go in its claim in its first sentence, Amy Cooper, the woman charged with calling 911 and falsely accusing a Black man of threatening her in New York's Central Park. Christian Cooper did threaten Amy Cooper's dog, by his own admission. See the Candace Owens video referenced by /u/Ezwhiteknight27 or my own comments, el… | /r/MensRights | 17/10/20 03:23 PM |
| 1 | “Central Park Karen” likely to get community service for two 911 calls falsely accusing a black man of assaulting her and threatening her dogCandace Owens is always sharp. However, she (and I) made our original evaluation just after the incident, without knowledge of the second call Amy Cooper made to 911/police. Shamefully, the prosecutor revealed this call only 2 days ago. It changes the entire complexion (no pun intended) of the incident. | /r/MensRights | 17/10/20 03:14 PM |
| 2 | “Central Park Karen” likely to get community service for two 911 calls falsely accusing a black man of assaulting her and threatening her dog/u/ThirdPersonRecording is referring to the "3/5 compromise" - and repeatedly showing his/her ignorance. /u/ThirdPersonRecording's initial comment is apparently a reference to the idea that calling police about a black man is an attempt to have police murder him. But this idea is contradicted by the statistics. In a country the size of the USA, arrest-related deaths run annually about 750 to 1700 (depending upon definitions) out of 53 million people who had police contact - a minuscule percentag… | /r/MensRights | 17/10/20 08:57 AM |
| 2 | “Central Park Karen” likely to get community service for two 911 calls falsely accusing a black man of assaulting her and threatening her dogBut he does himself no credit by an ideological stance, attempting to connect the incident to the White House. It is estimated 5.000 black men were lynched between 1865 and 1915, often on the basis of fabricated claim of sexual impropriety against a white woman - more than a century before the current occupant entered the White House. Does Cooper mean Trump capable of time travel? | /r/MensRights | 17/10/20 12:09 AM |
| 0 | “Central Park Karen” likely to get community service for two 911 calls falsely accusing a black man of assaulting her and threatening her dogExactly who solicited murder, when, in what words???? | /r/MensRights | 17/10/20 12:05 AM |
| 0 | “Central Park Karen” likely to get community service for two 911 calls falsely accusing a black man of assaulting her and threatening her dog"He is recording me, threatening myself and my dog.” Unfortunately, he did threaten her dog: As he himself recounts: https://www.westsiderag.com/2020/05/26/white-woman-called-police-on-black-birdwatcher-in-central-park-weaponizing-white-fragility ME: Look, if you’re going to do what you want, I’m going to do what I want, but you’re not going to like it. He reached in his bag. He knew full well this appeared threatening. He then pulled out treats, knowing full well this would be interpreted by th… | /r/MensRights | 16/10/20 11:54 PM |
| 5 | Feminist Anthem Singer Reddy "I am Woman" Passes OnShe may be dead, but her misandrist spirit lives on. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2zledm/feminist_bullshit_helen_reddys_feminist_iconic/ | /r/MensRights | 11/10/20 06:49 PM |
| 2 | Women want equality until the bill arrivesIts a horrible, one sided sub. Not so one-sided as the misandrist feminist propaganda which has dominated Western civilisation for decades. Besides, aren't men told to express their feelings? Yet you then deem it "horrible" when they do? Oh, I get it - you only want men to express feelings with which you agree. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/20 11:05 AM |
| 2 | Women want equality until the bill arrivesI ery much like r/menslib. Because it rarely challenges the evil perpetrated by feminism? | /r/MensRights | 04/10/20 11:02 AM |
| 0 | Women want equality until the bill arrivesWomen want equality until the bill arrives Doesn't this apply not only to dates but to marriage, children, and male-female relationships generally, both in finance and in other repsonsibilities? And, has this not always been the case? Joanne Bailey Begiato's monograph on coverture generally seems to indicate coverture placing the entire financial burden on the male, with the females effectively holding power of attorney to spend from his accounts. Beginning approximately with the US "Married Wom… | /r/MensRights | 03/10/20 07:41 PM |
| 5 | Women want equality until the bill arrivesWe should raise a demand for "date fraud" law frequently. Even if it has no chance of happening, it's a valid counter to feminist law and should be raised as an issue. It's also shocking to see the occasional article by a female, openly recounting how she has used men for date fraud, with no shame and no remorse. Moreover, if the male-female relationship starts out with exploitation of the male, why are we surprised that more exploitation - alimony, child support for children fathers cannot see,… | /r/MensRights | 03/10/20 07:11 PM |
| 1 | "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race."A question: Some European law has criminalised "hate speech" and prosecuted individuals (including Bardot and Fallaci) simply for critical speech. So, law should be consistent. Will France or the UK or Italy now demand extradition of Gearhart so she can be criminally prosecuted? | /r/MensRights | 03/10/20 07:03 PM |
| 4 | Women want equality until the bill arrivesIts a horrible, one sided sub. Far less so than the millions of feminist blogs, books, theories, uni courses, legal lobby groups, feminist politicians, and feminist lawyers who deem men subhuman, who have successfully commandeered governance, and who have made life a living hell for too many modern men. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/20 06:48 PM |
| 10 | Women want equality until the bill arrivesIf I ask a girl out to dinner, I would pay the entire bill. That's an unfair criterion which exploits the male, since the majority of the time it is the male who makes the first move or first invitation. (Note that I say majority, not always.) This is not criticism of /u/gunnetham. Many of us have had to resign ourselves to paying for the first several dates if we want to meet a partner. But we don't have to like it, and we can still make sure any resulting relationship quickly becomes egalitari… | /r/MensRights | 03/10/20 06:44 PM |
| 1 | Contrary to expectations from the pervasive misogyny theory research suggest that such biases often favor womenThis article is excellent but has still swallowed feminist historical revisionism: For a long time, women in the West were treated as property This particular feminist misrepresentation was debunked long ago by Joanne Bailey and Martin van Creveled (and Karen Straughan?). | /r/MensRights | 27/09/20 01:34 AM |
| 6 | Model agrees to nude pictures because she thought it would boost her career and signs consent form. 5 years later left modelling. Photographer wants to include pictures in book. She accuses him of using pictures without her consent even though she signed a contract.Feminism has expended millions of words interpreting every aspect of human existence through an ideological lens. So, if only for balance, or only arguendo, MR should sometimes counter ideology with ideology. For example: Western society, both currently and historically, has many aspects of a gynocracy - dictatorship of the feminine, enforced through alpha male proxies. The core of gynocratic control over both ordinary and alpha males lies in female sexuality and its innate or biological or horm… | /r/MensRights | 25/09/20 12:39 PM |
| 7 | Dehumanizing and discriminating against men for having higher sex drives is as valid as dehumanizing women for having periodsCheck out Norah Vincent's book, Self-Made Man: My Year Disguised as a Man | /r/MensRights | 25/09/20 08:44 AM |
| 1 | Gynocentric reporting of the suicide crisis in Australia continues to focus on women and girls and ignore men and boysSorry, your attitude is not only wrong but disgusting and probably results in unnecessary male deaths. OP is correct. The article expends thousands of words upon the problem of youth suicide without even mentioning the grotesquely higher rate of suicide among boys and men. As if to emphasise the article's contempt for male life, it cherry-picks claimed statistics which focus upon the female: “Twice as many young women aged 15–19 years died by suicide in 2015 than in 2005 I'll explain it like you… | /r/MensRights | 24/09/20 01:51 PM |
| 4 | Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion Of Gender Equality, Dies At 87pet issues Joint custody of children is a "pet issue"? Conscription for miltary service is a "pet issue"? These are matters of fundamental human rights, not "pet issues". You sound more like a rabid feminist than an MRA. You don't cite evidence for how she was instrumental in title IX. You didn't read the ACLU article I linked, did you? Meanwhile, the Women’s Rights Project [directed by Ginsburg] ... pushed for passage of Title IX. ... we were successful — the legislation passed. Title IX, of co… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/20 04:47 PM |
| 3 | Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion Of Gender Equality, Dies At 87I cited 2 cases. You have trouble understanding the meaning of aphorims, don't you? Her occasional support of a male was, by your own admission (did you read your own material?), only for the purpose of empowering females: "This absolute exclusion, based on gender per se, operates to the disadvantage of female workers, their surviving spouses, and their children," Her concern was admittedly the effect on females, not males. "World to end tomorrow. Women hardest hit." Do you have some examples fo… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/20 04:22 PM |
| 4 | Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion Of Gender Equality, Dies At 87One swallow (case) does not a summer make. By a long career with emphasis on rights for women and relatively little attention to rights for men, Ginsburg did significant damage to society. The thread title, "Champion of Gender Equality", is simply not accurate. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/20 03:24 PM |
| 9 | Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked.Excellent post! Further support for you viewpoint is here: Refutation of "Women's Historical Oppression". Note particularly the works by van Creveld, by Bailey, and by Marinella (in the comments). Your citations and mine make clear that: The traditional marriage contract is, to a large extent, a contract for male slavery. The role of couverture was to protect and empower the female, placing all responsibility on the back of the male, while giving the female a virtual power of attorney to all the… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/20 05:10 PM |
| 2 | French Book "I Hate Men"The question is not "hatred" per se but the double standard Western society applies to hatred of men vs hatred of women, of Muslims, etc. (See the prosecution of Brigitte Bardot, Oriana Fallaci, Bob Dylan, ...). the rampant violations of men's human rights instigated or spurred or exacerbated by hatred of men. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/20 06:47 PM |
| 11 | Emmeline Pankhurst statue MUST GO! Anger at 'WWI bullying of thousands of young men'Nonsense. The Suffragists would have got women the vote without the violence and terrorism committed by the Suffragettes. Pankhurst and her WSPU have the blood of thousands of young men on their hands. Further, the objective of vote for women without responsibilities - conscription, supporting the family, descending into the mines, etc - was attained but was not reasonable. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/20 10:38 PM |
| 1 | Dear Women: your opinions have value and are welcomed hereDo you think third-world women on average more ready to recognise and appreciate the male role, than first-world women? | /r/MensRights | 30/08/20 03:03 PM |
| 0 | Dear Women: your opinions have value and are welcomed herebad feminists Redundant. The only feminists who care about men generally are the conservatives and independents whom the feminist core rejects and terms anti-feminist: Sommers, Fiamengo, Jaye, Straughan, etc. The only core feminist to have cared one whit about men is the late Karen DeCrow. Further, it's not even feminists who are our problem. Our problem involves the majority of Western females who enjoy the advantages given them by feminist governance and who, by actions, opinions, and vote ens… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/20 02:58 PM |
| 4 | Dear Women: your opinions have value and are welcomed hereYour approach is viciously misandrist. Women get to demonise men and bend all of society to "principles" of gynocentric power and feminist governance, destroying much of men's human rights. But if the male complains too bitterly, you tell him he is the problem and he should shut up, because you don't want to hear it. Bigoted much? Even your history is falsified: Wanna be heard? Want things to change? Start getting people to listen. Even I don’t wanna listen to your waaahmbulance siren Men's righ… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/20 02:51 PM |
| 3 | The reason women receive "too much attention from men" is a symptom of the exact same problem that men complain about: dating inequality.Perhaps dating inequality can be reduced by legislation criminalising date fraud. Modern or pre-modern feminism achieved considerable success by demonising any male activity it dislikes, building upon society's gynocentrism. No legislation was too absurd or too intrusive. For example, several countries have criminal rape-by-fraud statutes, under which the male has committed rape if he gets a female into bed by misrepresenting himself, his career, his income, etc. So, even if ultimately unsuccess… | /r/MensRights | 16/08/20 10:12 AM |
| 1 | Sexism in Austria: conscription, higher pension ages, hiring discrimination.https://www.nvlchawaii.org/us-admits-injustice-ajas-reparations On Aug. 10, 1988, President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act, formally apologizing to AJAs [Americans of Japanese Ancestry] and providing reparations of $20,000 to each surviving victim who was incarcerated during World War II. https://www.iom.int/files/live/sites/iom/files/What-We-Do/docs/German-Forced-Labour-Compensation-Programme-GFLCP.pdf the German Parliament passed the German Foundation Act establishing the German … | /r/MensRights | 16/08/20 09:42 AM |
| 10 | Imagine losing half AND writing a $50K check EVERY... SINGLE... MONTH.It is commonplace for males to be required to pay females even when both have high-earning careers: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/gossip/la-et-mg-melanie-griffith-antonio-banderas-divorce-finalized-20151208-story.html This is because society will use any pretext to sacrifice males and male lives to the whim and greed of the female. Only the name changes, such as "breach of promise" suits a century ago. Modern terms for the same thing are "alimony", "palimony", "child support", "non-discl… | /r/MensRights | 16/08/20 09:35 AM |
| 1 | Made a short and energetic video on the struggle of modern men and certain female privilegesThe ostensible 100 boys dying of circumcision is a discredited figure: http://circumcisionnews.blogspot.com/2010/05/fatally-flawed-bollingers-circumcision.html | /r/MensRights | 13/08/20 04:16 AM |
| 3 | Sexism in Austria: conscription, higher pension ages, hiring discrimination.Indeed. Will there be reparations or other compensation to those men who have been shortchanged in the past (and are still alive)? Will they be paid a lump-sum amount equivalent to 5 years' pension? | /r/MensRights | 12/08/20 09:10 PM |
| 1 | Men may not pay a "pink tax" but they do pay a "relationship tax", which can easily run hundreds of thousands of dollars over a lifetimeBut "all of society" is often wrong. Many societies have had a primary characteristic of racism or homophobia but have succeeded in strongly reducing them. Similarly, gynocentrism seems a core characteristic of our society (or even of human nature) but likely can be mitigated. "Working-class infighting" and AWALT ("All Women Are Like That") may be substantive issues but need not be resolved for MR to be effective. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/08/20 10:25 PM |
| 1 | Men may not pay a "pink tax" but they do pay a "relationship tax", which can easily run hundreds of thousands of dollars over a lifetimeWell, it's slowly gonna turn into women=bad sub like all the other men subs. But what if the MR problem really is one of society giving into a majority of women who demand a gynocracy (aka feminist governance)? Also food for thought: https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/ | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/08/20 06:35 PM |
| 1 | Men may not pay a "pink tax" but they do pay a "relationship tax", which can easily run hundreds of thousands of dollars over a lifetimeAdditional point supporting OP: Much of government boils down to wealth transfer from men to women: Men work longer hours at higher-stress, higher-paying jobs. Thus men pay a disproportionate share of taxes. Women live longer and make greater use of government benefits, so they receive a disproportionate amount of benefit programs. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/08/20 06:30 PM |
| 1 | Roy Den Hollander, a misandrist anti-MRA and anti-feminist responsible for the murder of prominent MRA lawyer, Marc Angelucci. Rest in peace, Marc. Your advocacy will be remembered and may justice be served.Excellent research. Thank you! | /r/MensRights | 26/07/20 01:36 AM |
| 3 | Roy Den Hollander, a misandrist anti-MRA and anti-feminist responsible for the murder of prominent MRA lawyer, Marc Angelucci. Rest in peace, Marc. Your advocacy will be remembered and may justice be served.I think your analysis correct and note: In response to limited MR success, den Hollander became bitter and began to hate everyone. His terminal cancer may have warped his mind psychologically or even physically, as I suggest here: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/huqjx2/mens_rights_attorney_roy_den_hollander_found_dead/fyrwsui/ We can take the view that den Hollander's pathology took the life of a valiant MRA, Angelucci. But we might also take the view that the very hard path society… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/20 02:56 PM |
| -1 | Mens Rights Attorney Roy Den Hollander found dead of self inflicted GSW, suspected in Salas family slaying- same MO as Marc Angelucci's assassinationRelentless injustice can make the victims desperate and even bring character defects to the surface which might otherwise have gone unexpressed. Some of the time this appears as self-harm: Thomas Ball's self-immolation Earl Silverman's suicide In fact, injustice makes certain that a few out of many victims will "go over the edge" or "lose it" or "snap". Unfortunately, we have to expect it. Many movements, including feminism and civil rights, have tried to deflect the splash of misbehaving indivi… | /r/MensRights | 21/07/20 03:44 PM |
| 2 | Mens Rights Attorney Roy Den Hollander found dead of self inflicted GSW, suspected in Salas family slaying- same MO as Marc Angelucci's assassinationby you saying feminism is a hate movement is the same as people saying the same about us Really? If we denounce [feminism|the KKK] as a hate movement, then that makes us a hate movement? My dear Watson, your "reasoning" defies elementary logic. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/20 03:18 PM |
| 2 | Mens Rights Attorney Roy Den Hollander found dead of self inflicted GSW, suspected in Salas family slaying- same MO as Marc Angelucci's assassinationI have reported people in the past and nothing was done. Let's see if what you do this time. Sounds like you want to use the mods to censor those with whom you disagree. If so, the mods were right to ignore you. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/20 03:13 PM |
| 2 | Mens Rights Attorney Roy Den Hollander found dead of self inflicted GSW, suspected in Salas family slaying- same MO as Marc Angelucci's assassinationim just gonna guess Guessing in this matter is irresponsible. Further, from available information, Hollander's past - a lawyer pushing MR - has been that of a committed activist, albeit a bitter one - but no obvious intent to violence. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/20 03:07 PM |
| 1 | Mens Rights Attorney Roy Den Hollander found dead of self inflicted GSW, suspected in Salas family slaying- same MO as Marc Angelucci's assassinationExcellent post! Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/20 03:06 PM |
| 10 | Mens Rights Attorney Roy Den Hollander found dead of self inflicted GSW, suspected in Salas family slaying- same MO as Marc Angelucci's assassinationFeminism is a hate movement, so antifeminism is a laudable stance and a core element of MR. fuck off from this sub No, you should fuck off and stop trying to censor others. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/20 04:21 AM |
| 7 | Mens Rights Attorney Roy Den Hollander found dead of self inflicted GSW, suspected in Salas family slaying- same MO as Marc Angelucci's assassinationYou want to exclude those with whom you disagree? That makes you far more dangerous than they. The cancel culture is vile. And, dividing up MR by left-right is a sure path to political failure, dissipating our impact. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/20 04:18 AM |
| 9 | Mens Rights Attorney Roy Den Hollander found dead of self inflicted GSW, suspected in Salas family slaying- same MO as Marc Angelucci's assassinationYou’re likely a troll. I think it is you who needs to go. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/20 12:40 AM |
| 9 | Mens Rights Attorney Roy Den Hollander found dead of self inflicted GSW, suspected in Salas family slaying- same MO as Marc Angelucci's assassinationI haven’t read every comment ever posted on the sub, but the only objectionable rhetoric here is your own defaming a legitimate sub. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/20 12:39 AM |
| 14 | Mens Rights Attorney Roy Den Hollander found dead of self inflicted GSW, suspected in Salas family slaying- same MO as Marc Angelucci's assassinationI have seen no evidence of Hollander being connected to this sub. Absent such connection, your drivel is rank defamation. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/20 11:23 PM |
| 1 | ACLU Betrays Due Process on Campus | Sues Betsy DeVos Over New Sexual Misconduct RulesSo you'd think that even if it's 5 - 7 on the same page would you? I didn't give a number. In this case, the matter is sufficiently important that I didn't mind reading several, each with a different article linked. it's usually when a new story breaks people just take it as an excuse to spam. Even so, each post has not only different articles linked but different comments. I don't understand the rush to moderate. We receive so much information daily, that each of us is capable of looking at a p… | /r/MensRights | 18/07/20 03:14 PM |
| 1 | ACLU Betrays Due Process on Campus | Sues Betsy DeVos Over New Sexual Misconduct RulesSo? I don't understand the objection to multiple postings, which can be useful: Many people glance at the first page, so another posting of the topic helps in matters of great importance, such as this. (Maybe 1 should be stickied.) Each posting links to a different article with a different commentary, all of which is also interesting. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/20 03:17 AM |
| 8 | My dream is for feminist revisionist history to be exposed for what it is and people realize that the men=privileged women=oppressed historical narrative is falseMy dream is for feminist revisionist history to be exposed for what it is Several observers have already done so, most notably van Creveld and Karen Straughan, each in his/her own way. Here are some references including this very interesting comment. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/20 01:33 AM |
| 1 | Ideology vs movement: my response to a post called "Feminism is a dogma""Feminism is a dogma" And dogma runs over my karma. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/20 04:03 PM |
| 1 | Ideology vs movement: my response to a post called "Feminism is a dogma"I think your comments spot-on. Let me add a few of my own ideas in support: Women have always had considerable privilege. See some of the references I give here as well as a commenter's Marinella reference in the same thread. Some human reactions seem innate but can be modified. For example, both dislike of the other (including racism and homophobia) and devaluation of darker skin appear in disparate societies and so may be innate - but in some places may be successfully fought. I have come to s… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/20 03:59 PM |
| 1 | Patriarchy doesn't existYou’re welcome - but don’t thank me, thank the author and MR stalwart Jack Kammer: https://www.google.com/search?q=jack+kammer | /r/MensRights | 27/05/20 01:25 AM |
| 2 | Patriarchy doesn't exist“If Men Have All the Power How Come Women Make the Rules” http://mail.deltabravo.net/cms/files/downloads/ifmenhav.pdf http://www.rulymob.com/ | /r/MensRights | 27/05/20 12:41 AM |
| 2 | Devos giving men rights on campus, sued by ACLU. How does that even work?"It shouldn't happen" does not equal "It didn't happen" I agree. It's useful to give the facts of (a) lynchings and (b) historical witch trials - and particularly the Salem witch trials - as counter-examples to those who rush to judgment and who assume guilt, especially those who claim, "There are multiple accusations, so the accused must be guilty." | /r/MensRights | 17/05/20 12:03 AM |
| 1 | Devos giving men rights on campus, sued by ACLU. How does that even work?It did happen historically, in witch trials - now acknowledged barbaric. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch_trials_in_the_early_modern_period Prosecutions for the crime of witchcraft reached a highpoint from 1580 to 1630 during the Counter-Reformation and the European wars of religion, when an estimated 50,000[1][2] people were burned at the stake, of which roughly 80% were women,[3][4] and most often over the age of 40. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/20 11:12 PM |
| 2 | ACLU, The New American Prosecutor. Link includes a phenomenal legal review of the new Title IX regulations.Good post. Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/20 10:47 PM |
| 8 | ACLU Betrays Due Process on Campus | Sues Betsy DeVos Over New Sexual Misconduct RulesI know nothing about the OP, but what’s wrong with this post? The ACLU has been misandrist for decades and gets worse every year. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/20 10:15 PM |
| 2 | When Rules Don’t Apply: Joe Biden wants to deny accused college students the procedural protections that he demands for himselfIrony: It was Biden, as chair or the appropriate Senate committee, who ran the inquisition of Clarence Thomas on the basis of unsubstantiated accusation, an earlier instance of misandrist anti-Kavanaugh-tactics. Current comment: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/opinion/editorials/2020/05/10/editorial-devos-upholds-basic-rights-title-ix-rule/3094660001/ https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/496518-biden-says-hell-reverse-devos-rule-to-bolster-protections-for-those-accused https://www.politico.co… | /r/MensRights | 10/05/20 04:55 PM |
| 1 | Men's right outside the westYou're quite welcome! It looked interesting, so I copied it into Notepad to separate the paragraphs & so not lose place. Then it was easy to format. About formatting: Just click the "formatting help" below the right edge of the text entry (Reply) box. There are also many guides to "markdown" (the quick-format markings used by Reddit & others): https://www.reddit.com/wiki/markdown https://www.reddit.com/r/tabled/wiki/table-format Bullet points are particularly easy - just an asterix before each i… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/20 09:40 PM |
| 1 | This woman (below comment) could not have debunked this feminists femisplainer (above) any better. So succinct yet so powerful. A whole movement debunked in such few words. A femisplainer put in her place. WOWJust the opposite - by "inclusive gender equality" Randazzo clearly means the inclusion of men. (Hurrah for Randazzo!) | /r/MensRights | 09/05/20 08:49 PM |
| 4 | Men's right outside the westAn excellent post! I have reformatted for legibility but vouch for every single point: Lol stfu, seriously “You Indian are misogynists”, that is a HUGE generalization right there. Women have a countless amount of privileges in India. You said that women are treated like shit in the poorer parts of India, and they are. But so are the men as well, it’s shit for everyone there. Being poor in India is sooo much worse than being poor in USA. The land where you live is rather easily just taken so that… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/20 05:07 PM |
| 4 | Men's right outside the westI reassert that feminism has tainted every country, usually in complete contempt for men's human rights: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ga4m5d/is_feminism_any_better_in_europe_than_in_us/foy40mf/ In my experience, every country is tainted by feminism, leading me to wonder if gynocentrism is innate to the human animal, male and female. What differs between countries are details. For example, the USA is more litigious than European countries in harassment or hostile environment claim… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/20 04:59 PM |
| 2 | A former neighbor of Joe Biden's accuser Tara Reade has come forward to corroborate her sexual assault account - Business InsiderCan some please explain to me the feminist logic Here is a critical point even MRAs miss: In both the Clinton-Lewinsky-Willey and Biden-Reade matters, many feminists began to excuse Clinton's and Biden's ostensible advances. In the Clinton case, Gloria Steinem was said sarcastically to have approved of "one free grope". It is a lesser point that it is hypocrisy for feminists to "switch sides" to excuse advances because the male is politically favoured. The major point should be: Feminists switch… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/20 09:13 AM |
| 2 | A former neighbor of Joe Biden's accuser Tara Reade has come forward to corroborate her sexual assault account - Business InsiderI will still enjoy watching this Same here. If memory serves, it was Biden who ran the inquisition of Clarence Thomas. I'm not sure of the best course: To insist upon principles - that it is unacceptable for any man to be subject to false accusation, accusation after decades, accusation without real evidence, mis-respresentation of hearsay as "outcry" and "corroboration", trial by media, etc. Or to sit back, have some popcorn, and experience the superb schadenfreude of seeing a bastard like Bide… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/20 03:14 PM |
| 2 | My friend got demoted from his company for getting s*xually harassed. Is this fair?See a lawyer immediately. In many jurisdictions, retaliation or demotion in response to a complaint is barred by law and is a separate count of discrimination. Plaintiffs have won suits over retaliation even while losing the underlying discrimination allegation. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/20 11:13 PM |
| 3 | A former neighbor of Joe Biden's accuser Tara Reade has come forward to corroborate her sexual assault account - Business InsiderBI is incompetent. Hearsay is not corroboration. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/20 08:38 PM |
| 2 | A former neighbor of Joe Biden's accuser Tara Reade has come forward to corroborate her sexual assault account - Business InsiderBut the law (and OP) has made such hearsay-like smoke into "corroboration" under the theories of "fresh complaint" and "outcry witness". It's obscene. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/20 06:27 PM |
| 4 | The crisis for men is here, and no one gives a single fuck.What they have now is absolute power. Google governance feminism. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/20 08:39 AM |
| 2 | Women in IT More Likely To Be Promoted Than Men, Study FindsThat uni and it’s “news” are twisted. The publication manages to turn proof of discrimination against men into a misandrist propaganda screed. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/20 08:23 AM |
| 3 | A former neighbor of Joe Biden's accuser Tara Reade has come forward to corroborate her sexual assault account - Business InsiderI object to hearsay, gossip and accusation (even if repeated to 100 listeners) being considered corroboration. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/20 01:14 AM |
| 4 | If you are going MGTOW, that's fine. But don't fall into the trap of being on "team men."You're jumping to conclusions without knowing his details. I know of no study, but /u/CuriousIncel2 may be right that women are less willing to risk or sacrifice for a male, than the reverse. Society trains men to sacrifice for women. | /r/MGTOW2 | 29/04/20 02:48 PM |
| 3 | If you are going MGTOW, that's fine. But don't fall into the trap of being on "team men."all of mgtow hate simps, white knights and male sjws. Most also hate Tradcucks and PUAs as well. True, succinct and justifiable - simps, white knights, sjws, tradcucks, PUAs, TRPs all make it harder for other men. They let females and society put men into very damaging competition with each other. MGTOWs avoid the trap by pulling out of the race. | /r/MGTOW2 | 29/04/20 02:42 PM |
| 3 | Female teacher "checks (male) toilets for phones" every breakfor reporters covering sporting events. not for adult teachers leering at underage students. There should be no difference. They're both instances of feminist society allowing the humiliation of males - denying them any modesty, as if they were dogs or chimps - all to ensure males understand and submit to their subordinate place. Besides, articles have mentioned female reporters even admitting to enjoying "leering" at naked males. and really the solution to that SHOULD have been NO REPORTERS in … | /r/MensRights | 29/04/20 02:15 PM |
| 4 | Female teacher "checks (male) toilets for phones" every breakthere is no reason why a female teacher should be in the male bathrooms. Indeed. But note that - in an extreme example of feminism controlling all - USA courts and sports leagues have enforced female access to male changing rooms! | /r/MensRights | 29/04/20 02:01 PM |
| 2 | Female teacher "checks (male) toilets for phones" every breakOne unexplored area of MR issues is society's disparate treatment of modesty issues: I know no stats but assert male modesty is derided, while female modesty is exalted. This is, of course, a technique used by society to enhance gynocentric power. Offended female modesty or female honour was usually at the basis of lynchings of thousands of innocent African-American males. Society's worship of female modesty or female "honour" has historically been violently oppressive to men - for example, havi… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/20 01:59 PM |
| 2 | Is feminism any better in Europe than in US?Spain even has specialised courts, Juzgados de Violencia Sobre la Mujer, no? Result of a fully-gendered 2004 law? A few years ago, there was an estimate of one million such gendered cases, 90% with no evidence at all. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/20 12:56 PM |
| 4 | Is feminism any better in Europe than in US?In my experience, every country is tainted by feminism, leading me to wonder if gynocentrism is innate to the human animal, male and female. What differs between countries are details. For example, the USA is more litigious than European countries in harassment or hostile environment claims, and positive discrimination is more aggressive and formalised in the USA. But the insane feminism still creeps in everywhere, just via other routes. Feminist laws in India have wrought havoc. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/20 12:52 PM |
| 3 | Is feminism any better in Europe than in US?Austria considered a law to force men to sit when urinating. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/20 12:47 PM |
| 1 | Unsurprising to see comments like this at this pointImagine if she gets pregnant by a 13-year-old boy? Getting preggers from a blow job? That would be historic, even miraculous. 😬 | /r/MensRights | 29/04/20 03:18 AM |
| 9 | Found this article today and it's just slandering Jonny deppMan's no saint, he's made mistakes, but he's not nearly as bad as this makes him out to be. This. I've recently realised one more technique in the feminist arsenal: Every human being makes mistakes. If a man makes a mistake, crucify him while either pretending women are saints who never make mistakes overlooking or finding excuses for any mistake, innocuous or grave, made by a woman (such as Jolie's lies to Federal authorities). | /r/MensRights | 28/04/20 01:54 PM |
| 13 | Holy shit. u/duhhhh writes a well thought out and verifiable comment about "made to penetrate" vs. "rape" and the role of feminist agitators => so he's 'reported for hatespeach', is 'a complete fucking asshole', a 'MRA troll' and 'uneducated'.https://np.reddit.com/r/pointlesslygendered/comments/fyql6t/lord_knows_the_two_arent_the_same/fn2rzl1/ /u/Beardedgeek72 deserves a misandry award for cramming so many lies into just 5 paragraphs. And /u/duhhhh deserves an award for carefully dismantling every one of those lies with cold, hard facts. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/20 01:50 PM |
| 1 | I am afraid this sub is nextMy, you're completely unable to conceive as human a male different from yourself. Let's take just this central point: Nobody owes anybody sex, period. I'll ELY5 (explain it like you're 5). 1a. A human being needs food. 1b. That does not give him/her the right to take it by theft or force. 1c. It does mean that a civilised society would find a solution - for example, the dole, or charity soup kitchens. 2a. A human being needs emotional and sexual companionship. 2b. That does not give him/her the … | /r/MensRights | 21/04/20 08:54 AM |
| 2 | This is a vent, you call me a misogynist?, I'm a misogynist thenOP, here are two ideas which may help your morale and outlook: Read or view the comments of a number of very smart, pro-male women. Here's a partial list: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/39z669/womens_recognition_award/ Recognise that antagonists calling you names or engaging in ad hominem attacks against you, are really admitting they have no substantive arguments to offer. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/20 12:40 AM |
| 1 | "Women are sharing the things their male friends do that make them uncomfortable"Women willing to fight have always found a way to do so, from Joan of Arc to Cathay Williams. "We weren't allowed" is the all-purpose feminist excuse for irresponsibility and for leaving all the hard work to men, indeed imposing it upon men. The ability for women to become soldiers is a relatively recent development, and societal change to make that acceptable takes time. More false excuses and ahistorical to boot. Most societies did provide a way for women to volunteer, as early as the Biblical… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/20 01:50 PM |
| 5 | "Women are sharing the things their male friends do that make them uncomfortable"The question has been raised - what is "date fraud"? Here is a useful description of Farrell's "date fraud" concept, with links to studies: https://np.reddit.com/r/against mens rights/comments/210acb/farrell_date_fraud_and_date_lying/ [For those who don't want to go to /againstmensrights, here's an archive: http://archive.is/EheGs] Farrell's conception and my own are not necessarily identical. However, it's interesting material. I hope the bot doesn't delete it. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/20 03:39 PM |
| 3 | "Women are sharing the things their male friends do that make them uncomfortable"Who said anything about sex? Your assumptions are wrong. Is it so hard to perceive injustice to the male? Date fraud is shorthand for a woman pretending social or emotional or romantic interest in a male for the sake of a "meal ticket" - that is, getting free meals and entertainment. Wise men will wait to spend on a woman until they perceive her earnest. But restaurants and theatre in major cities are expensive. It's not unusual for a dishonest woman to extract benefits worth hundreds of quid fr… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/20 03:25 PM |
| 3 | "Women are sharing the things their male friends do that make them uncomfortable"Date fraud is shorthand for a woman pretending social or emotional or romantic interest in a male for the sake of a "meal ticket" - that is, getting free meals and entertainment. Wise men will wait to spend on a woman until they perceive her earnest. But restaurants and theatre in major cities are expensive. It's not unusual for a dishonest woman to extract benefits worth hundreds of quid from an earnest guy, before he walks away. What such women (no, not all women) do is clearly a form of fraud… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/20 03:24 PM |
| 6 | "Women are sharing the things their male friends do that make them uncomfortable"Or just want a free meal? This - but much more than a free meal - a dozen free meals, theatre, sometimes jewellery, etc. Some women expect it even when the male can clearly not afford it. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/20 03:18 PM |
| 2 | Men in feminists' History vs Most men in history. Originally posted by u/TheAndredal in r/SocialJusticeInAction.shadowbanned The reddit admins are now so paranoid that they ban their own shadows? ;-} | /r/MensRights | 06/04/20 12:26 PM |
| 1 | A round of applause for the government of Ontario for displaying the correct definition and statistics about rape (sexual violence) on their website.Sorry, this is not progress. 1 in 3 and 1 in 6 are vastly inflated numbers. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/20 11:56 AM |
| 1 | Why Do MRAs So Hate MGTOWs?I think MRA see MGTOW as a hate group, and there is some validity in that. In INCELs ars for sure a hate group but then so is feminism Wrong - neither MGTOW nor Incels are hate groups. Feminism proposes to deny men many human rights. MGTOW deosn't want to deprive women of any rights at all. It just wants to encourage men to steer clear of injurious entanglement. Incels don't want to deny anyone's rights. They just want to find the emotional and sexual company which every human being needs. Onlin… | /r/MGTOW | 02/04/20 02:53 PM |
| 1 | Norwegian investor wants to start a capital-fund that only invests in companies led by women.we all know that companies with female bosses get better results. This is false. See: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6sh60o/diversity_company_growth/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4seniz/potential_refutation_of_women_company_growth/ | /r/MensRights | 31/03/20 12:08 PM |
| 1 | MRAs outside the US, where are you from?The error in your reasoning is the fact that Muslims are only about 5% of the population, concentrated in Mindanao. Catholicism thoroughly dominates, representing over 80%. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/20 05:26 AM |
| 1 | I am afraid this sub is nextSure, must have nothing to do with the fact 90% of posts were hating aimlessly women and spreading incel propaganda, instead of you know, focusing on men and how one can live a life away from women. Any proof of your assertion? We have eyes and can see that most of the posts over there reflect not hatred but simply exasperation at the state of gender relations and their consequent personal solution of GTOW. In fact, the only difference between MRAs and MGTOWs is the gut estimate of the chances o… | /r/MensRights | 31/03/20 12:54 AM |
| 2 | MRAs outside the US, where are you from?Incorrect. In the Philippines, it's a cultural, not religious, practice: Circumcision in the Philippines predated the arrival of Christianity by at least two centuries: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuli_(rite) Catholicism has generally been ambiguous about circumcision, more often opposing it than supporting it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_male_circumcision#Christianity | /r/MensRights | 25/03/20 03:31 PM |
| 2 | I am afraid this sub is nextIn other words, you're guessing, and to boot reducing male human beings to a pejorative epithet, "incels", without the least sympathy for their problems. They're not ugly, but maybe you are. Were incels female, our feminist society would term their misery "oppression" and would condemn males for "abandoning" them. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/20 03:22 PM |
| 2 | I am afraid this sub is nextIt got overrun by incels about two years ago, though, so it went to shit fast. How would you know who is or is not an incel by his/her posts? Does their profile include a virginity or celibacy test? Why does the presence of incels imply (for you) mean "so it went to shit"? Overly aggressive, bitter or misogynist incels online do not necessarily represent the whole. Every human being needs emotional and sexual companionship. Women and society deny this to incels solely because the incel has not l… | /r/MensRights | 25/03/20 01:40 PM |
| 5 | MRAs outside the US, where are you from?Non-medical, non-religious circumcision just doesn't happen here, or anywhere else in the world as far as I know. Incorrect. South Korea and the Philippines have high rates of non-medical, non-religious circumcision. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/20 03:41 AM |
| 3 | False accusations are suddenly a serious issue when a woman is falsely accused by a man. Feminists eat it up.The NYT and its readership are so profoundly, incorrigibly misandrist, that I prefer to post it in archive reference only, so so as not to give clicks: http://archive.is/ytkrC Here's a classic comment, which the readership highly recommended: Anne San Rafael March 20 Times Pick This should have been followed to the end, J. should have been criminally prosecuted (I don't think he was based on this), and you could have started a GoFundMe for your legal costs. I read this story as just another atte… | /r/MensRights | 24/03/20 03:13 PM |
| 1 | Someone commented that men have the most powerful voices on issues because most politicians are men. I asked them to show any examples of politicians speaking up for men. I was downvoted til hidden, but nobody provided a single example.Excellent post. Alpha males represent females, not males. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/20 01:50 PM |
| 4 | Why is Leftism so inherently gynocentric?I've got no complaints about 1st wave feminism and Women's Suffrage in 1914. That was good & needed. No complaints? Even when 1st wave feminism Sent millions of men to die needlessly in the Great War? Gave white feathers to humiliate the men who hadn't submitted themselves to the meat grinder? Placed bombs in letter boxes? Place a bomb in Lloyd George's house? Attempted to kill Asquith? Demanded the vote for wealthy women but were indifferent to the vote for the working-class men who died in war… | /r/MensRights | 23/03/20 12:11 PM |
| 1 | Why is Leftism so inherently gynocentric?The only leftist woman to have spoken up for men's human rights, seems to have been the late Karen DeCrow. Almost all the others are conservative or libertarian: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/39z669/womens_recognition_award/ | /r/MensRights | 23/03/20 12:02 PM |
| 4 | A Crazed Academic Weaponized Title IX Against a Rival Professor Whose Job He Wanted - Note victims are lesbian coupleEither he's got a raging case of Base Rate Fallacy, and he's ignoring the vastly more prevalent trend in favour of this specific case that's the outlier, or he posted it specifically to play at exceptionalism, as an 'Ah HAH!', in order to lecture people on being open to the exceptions, probably because he thinks we need the lecture or correction. "Base Rate Fallacy" is a great term. But you're being too hard on OP. I took his post as simply an example that intrusive legislation can on occasion b… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/20 08:41 PM |
| 3 | Men's Rights in America is Dead.You are guessing that it may have been even worse without the MR movement, but that's all it is a guess. Do your really think the Dear Colleague letter would have been withdrawn without MR? Or joint custody and parental alienation entered the law (if not practice) of divorce? The men's rights movement has failed us. Feminism is winning over the majority of people, and men are too afraid to stand up for themselves. You're too pessimistic. The hard road we have is indeed frustrating, but things ar… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/20 08:32 PM |
| 3 | A Crazed Academic Weaponized Title IX Against a Rival Professor Whose Job He Wanted - Note victims are lesbian couple/u/Arthuyo doesn't deserve a hard time. In fact, this post highlights interesting principles: Much of anti-male legislation and social practices is stated in neutral terms but is still anti-male. Occasionally, those neutral terms are actually applied to females - the female nailed by Title IX or by mandatory DV arrest laws, for example. We can learn from OP's example by following a two-track approach: Simultaneously, we can object to anti-male laws in the first place, and we can also insist such… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/20 07:59 PM |
| 2 | Unpaid labor as the feminists state it does not exist. Proof, ask Ben Franklin. A penny saved is a penny earned.the man would have to pay to have it done Indeed - for much less money than absorbed by the typical wife. Strindberg showed this over a century ago: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4bly91/strindbergs_refutation_of_the_unpaid_work_claim/ https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/f57o56/if_you_want_a_marriage_of_equals_then_date_as/fi01hsz/ https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/enh2x6/8_facts_about_american_dads_including_the_fact/fe28jii/ Further, even the term "unpaid" is … | /r/MensRights | 22/03/20 07:52 PM |
| 3 | Men's Rights in America is Dead.OP, your reasoning contains a major error: You're right that men's rights in most Western countries may not be ideal but probably would have been much worse absent the diffuse MR movement. Examples: MR has made the concepts of joint custody and parental alienation commonplace, even if abrogation of these concepts is also commonplace. The current American SecEd, DeVos, may be an unpalatable character, but she did have MR organisations testify, resulting in rescission of the odious Dear Colleague … | /r/MensRights | 22/03/20 07:41 PM |
| 3 | Men's Rights in America is Dead.Here is her explanation. "I don't like what he did to his ex-wife. He was really mean to her!" How would your aunt know? Trump's exes have been very discreet, likely because of two reasons: they have class, and he probably had them sign a non-disclosure agreement to receive their divorce settlement. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/20 07:34 PM |
| 3 | I know I asked this before, but what are the good things men have done for women?Well, just for a start: Paved roads so women need not walk in muck. Created and installed modern plumbing - both water and waste. Created and installed modern heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems. Created modern transportation - railroad, automobile, aircraft. Reduced death in childbirth to negligible, at least in the developed countries. Created electric and power systems. Created and maintain septic systems. Constructed homes, flats, street lamps, bridges, tunnels. Created civili… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 21/03/20 11:27 PM |
| 3 | "Female supremacy: Women have better memories than men". Thoughts? Is this true or bogus?It's probably bogus. There may not be a single area of human endeavour in which "researchers" have not claimed women superior. This is contradicted by reality - men have accomplished far more than women in almost every discipline. The reality is that most (not all) of our comfortable, modern world - from automobiles to paved streets to stucco houses to nuclear physics - has been created by men. When reality contradicts the "scientific" model, the model is defective or the stats manipulated. Here… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/03/20 02:19 PM |
| 5 | My ex-wife gave me a disease and I'll never be the same again.You may have a legal cause of action against her. You should find and consult a pro-male lawyer specialising in the issue. | /r/MGTOW | 08/03/20 03:36 PM |
| 2 | Allen Guilt by Accusation. Boycott Hachette!Moses Farrow reveals the innocence of Woody Allen and the full extent of Mia Farrow’s evil: https://mosesfarrow.blogspot.com/2018/05/a-son-speaks-out-by-moses-farrow.html | /r/MensRights | 07/03/20 07:50 PM |
| 1 | Woody Allen, Dylan And Ronan Farrow, And The Meaninglessness Of #MeToo: "Much of the discourse around #MeToo allegations—even if they're untrue, or questionable—tends to swivel around one fundamental question: Should abuse accusations end men's careers?"False. Allen did not raise Soon-Yi. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/20 07:34 PM |
| 1 | Woody Allen, Dylan And Ronan Farrow, And The Meaninglessness Of #MeToo: "Much of the discourse around #MeToo allegations—even if they're untrue, or questionable—tends to swivel around one fundamental question: Should abuse accusations end men's careers?"False. Farrow and Allen were never married. They lived in separate flats on opposite sides of the city. Allen had very little to do with Soon-Yi until, at the age of 19, she was invited by Allen to a baseball? game at Mia’s suggestion. The whole fuss is Mia’s method of stalking of Allen in revenge for being scorned. Men who stalk exes end up in jail. So should Mia. Mia abused the children, a second reason for jail. Mia lied in police reports, a third reason for jail. Mia suborned perjury and att… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/20 07:33 PM |
| 3 | Feminist propaganda has successfully created several new concepts (wage gap, #metoo, mansplaining etc). MRAs, although they often have the truth on their side, haven't managed to create one single "buzzword"?Parental alienation Paternity fraud Date fraud Misandry | /r/MensRights | 07/03/20 01:52 AM |
| 1 | Two Steps Taken Towards Outlawing Males?Bunging in "men and boys" systematically for "males" sounds as stilted and clumsy as the insistence on "he or she", "his or hers", etc., the J4MB party notwithstanding. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/20 02:44 PM |
| 2 | Two Steps Taken Towards Outlawing Males?Couldn’t one use your logic to blame any victim of abuse? “It’s really not that hard to not flirt with men. don’t be desperate and control yourself. Until women learn to avoid men, women deserve what they get (abuse, rape, etc).” “It’s really not that hard for blacks to not interact with white men. don’t be desperate and control yourself. Until blacks learn to avoid whites, blacks deserve what they get.” | /r/MensRights | 02/03/20 05:10 AM |
| 3 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?What seemed weird to me is that media all over the world called him a rapist based on that allegation, because I associate that word with different behavior. You have put your finger on the miscarriage of justice. He was convicted of criminal behaviour (rape) partially on the basis of (as you say) world-wide sensationalism about non-criminal behaviour (quid pro quo). | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/03/20 10:08 PM |
| 1 | Rant-I was told my opinion doesn't matter because I'm a white maleNo. In fact, she managed to force her politically-correct council statement upon the two skeptical white male councilors. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/20 06:52 PM |
| 2 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?/u/genkernels probably means: Weinstein's repeated quid pro quo should be criminal but is not. Weinstein was found guilty of rape & assault when it's likely he only did quid pro quo. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/03/20 05:51 PM |
| 1 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?Frankly, you sound unhinged. Do you always degenerate to frothing-at-the-mouth rants when your grey cell is unable to cope with facts or logic? You have zero legal expertise You don't know that. You have no idea of my background. Like your idols, the false accusers in the Weinstein trial, you simply make unsubstantiated claims as an excuse for lack of provable facts. Let's take just one of your inanities: just insist on arguing on a topic that involves a man being punished for a crime that over … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/03/20 05:37 PM |
| 1 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?presumption of innocence is in a court of law Have you not noticed the Weinstein trial taking place in a court of law? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/03/20 04:48 PM |
| 2 | Rant-I was told my opinion doesn't matter because I'm a white maleYoung people learn this behaviour from older. Here is town council member Susan Buchanan who, from the podium, told two elected councilors to shut up on the basis of identity. (She should have been charged with civil rights violations and had her medical licence and faculty position withdrawn.) | /r/MensRights | 01/03/20 02:55 PM |
| 1 | Rant-I was told my opinion doesn't matter because I'm a white maleTry to find new, nicer friends. Think hard before taking legal action, which would tend to consume your life. It will get much easier after you graduate. You’ll leave behind the restrictive school atmosphere and find many friends in the world at large. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/20 02:47 PM |
| 2 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quid_pro_quo#Sexual_harassment https://www.macelree.com/sexual-harassment-sexual-assault/ To simplify somewhat: Threatening a job is a civil offence against discrimination law. I suppose you could characterise it as "situational coercion", but it's still a civil, not criminal, offence. Physical coercion is generally sexual assault or rape. Both are a criminal offence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quid_pro_quo#Sexual_harassment https://www.macelree.com/sexual-harass… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/02/20 05:01 PM |
| 1 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?Quid pro quo is not a crime. It is a civil offence against discrimination law. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/02/20 04:45 PM |
| 1 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?there is no other reason to be talking about a guys dong unless they’re accused of rape in a court of law I suppose I still don't understand your point. Women, like men, occasionally talk about the physical attributes of the opposite sex. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Big_(Sex_and_the_City) | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/02/20 04:37 PM |
| 0 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?Your citation contains no actual arguments in law, but you don't notice, because you are dedicated to eliminating the human rights of the male half of the human race, whom you consider untermenschen. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/02/20 04:32 PM |
| 0 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?Prosecutor Linda Fairstein has spoken of the myriad reasons for false accusations, but we are all capable of listing them. Indeed, that false rape accusations are commonplace was acknowledged millennia ago, and continues to the present, in literature of all types: Phaedra Potiphar's wife https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atonement_(novel) https://www.amazon.com/False-Accusations-Rape-Lynching-Predators/dp/1508971935 | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/02/20 04:29 PM |
| 0 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?OP and others here are shockingly ignorant of logic and contemptuous of basic human rights (such as the presumption of innocence). If the law and lawyers are never wrong, why bother with appeals courts? If the law and lawyers are never wrong, why bother with the Innocence Project? If the law and lawyers are never wrong, why did the UK and France eliminate the death penalty after executing innocents? If the law and lawyers are never wrong, then why lament the Holocaust, which the German courts of… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/02/20 04:09 PM |
| 0 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?the sloe descent Are you trying to gin up the place? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/02/20 03:50 PM |
| 0 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?Describing genitalia only indicates sex and does not indicate whether consensual or non-consensual. Accounts correlating has no probative value if accusers have had time to confer. Only completely independent accounts should be considered probative. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/02/20 03:47 PM |
| 1 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?It’s MRAs who have consistent principles, while feminists have none beyond, “The female is always right, and the male is always wrong.” Modern version of an old riddle: If a tree falls in the forest, and only the male hears it, is he still wrong? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/02/20 03:41 PM |
| 1 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?I think it's also bad to assume innocence. You’ve just undone fifteen centuries of civilised jurisprudence. Barbaric. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/02/20 03:36 PM |
| 12 | Should men be able to sue for the return of child support?To counter feminism, we should perhaps make the strongest possible arguments in the opposite direction. For example: Financial responsibility for a child should be relative to whether the father wanted the child to begin with the proportion of time each parent has with the child That proportional support should be met by direct spending on the child, not by payment to the mother. Thus child support should not exist in the first place. Child support (and alimony) is just a pretext to continue to … | /r/MensRights | 27/02/20 11:42 AM |
| 2 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?bad name Your bad name arises not from MRAs but from your willingness to abrogate men’s human rights on a massive scale. well known rapists You just assumed what was to be proved and was not proved beyond reasonable doubt. What you think allllll the accusations are little more than lies? So, you admit the case no more than accusations. It’s not up to a defendant to prove accusations lies. It was up to the prosecution to prove accusations true, and that was not done. Worse, follow-up, friendly co… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/02/20 11:25 AM |
| 2 | Even more Guardian misandry- Men should never be believed in rape cases, women should always be believed.The very existence of oath-on-oath cases is a violation of men’s human rights. Here is why such cases should never go to court: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4a8xw3/potential_argument_against_hesaidshesaid | /r/MensRights | 27/02/20 11:15 AM |
| 4 | Even more Guardian misandry- Men should never be believed in rape cases, women should always be believed.Hasn’t the Guardian had feminist articles suggesting men be “culled”? | /r/MensRights | 27/02/20 11:11 AM |
| 1 | If the pay gap is largely accounted for by women's tendency to choose careers that pay less and take time off work due to pregnancy, and women are the only member in a heterosexual couple that is allowed to determine if a pregnancy goes to term...then why is the pay gap considered the doing of men?Yes, it is just a joke. Given the prevalence of jokes putting down men (and rarely termed misandry), your knee-jerk reaction to an obvious joke about women is pure bigotry. Nathanson and Young have written a detailed analysis of bigoted, anti-male jokes and adverts in their book, Spreading Misandry. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/20 11:07 AM |
| 6 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?A commenter on a news-site thread summed up the reason why, in the Weinstein criminal case, the conviction was unjustified and indeed a dangerous precedent: There used to be a standard that it was better to let nine guilty men go free than risk convicting one innocent man. The new standard for rape is that it's better to convict nine innocent men than let one rapist go free. The problem with this conviction is that it sets the precedent, a man is guilty of rape even if the accuser had a long ter… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/02/20 10:02 AM |
| 2 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?Weinstein committed quid pro quo and not necessarily sexual assault. Precisely. But don’t bother trying to tell OP that. Her ears are closed. Curiously, Weinstein was never prosecuted for false references, even though that’s a criminal offence in California, with firm evidence in the case. I suppose the prosecution thought correctly it could get a conviction in the weak and contradictory assault cases. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/02/20 09:51 AM |
| 2 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?“Illegal” is an ambiguous term. Quid pro quo is a civil offence, not criminal. The problem here is that a criminal conviction was obtained despite a weak case and some proof of consent, by using multiple, unadjudicated “pattern” accusations and the accused’s history of rampant civil offences under quid pro quo. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/02/20 09:47 AM |
| 1 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?Sorry, in the law, quid pro quo is a civil offence of discrimination. It is not criminal per se. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/02/20 09:41 AM |
| -2 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?Actually, legal principles since Blackstone or earlier have required assuming the accused innocent, thus the more reliable absent other proof. But thank you for admitting the Weinstein [criminal] cases nothing more than an extended he said she said. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/20 12:28 PM |
| 0 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?Your response is so logical! | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/20 10:45 AM |
| 6 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?As a non-US citizen, all I heard was that he had offered women acting roles in return for sex. That is obviously very shitty behavior, but it's not immediately clear to me if it is illegal under US law. It is definitely distinct from rape via physical force. Sex for job is quid pro quo, a civil offence of discrimination under US law. You are correct that it is distinct from use of force, which is criminal. Weinstein was just convicted criminally, though the criminal case was much weaker than the… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/20 10:34 AM |
| 4 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?Realwinston probably means: The only hard evidence (that is, beyond accusations) in the Weinstein case consists of later friendly communications from accusers, which would help exonerate the accused. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/20 10:20 AM |
| 3 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?You asked why anyone would acquit, and I told you, but you won’t accept it. That’s a closed mind, made up in advance - as indicated by your speed and vehemence. That’s exactly why dismissal of the charges - or change of venue to Mars - would have been justified. Though I’d be tempted to give the Scottish verdict until more solid evidence is adduced. Incidentally, numbers of accusers - all with no proof (of force) beyond accusation - have historically been shown irrelevant to guilt. Among the inc… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/20 09:53 AM |
| 2 | Why are Men’s Rights attracting so little support?Excellent comment. Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/20 09:43 AM |
| 3 | Why are Men’s Rights attracting so little support?I’ve been tempted to conclude, reluctantly, that nature has built gynocentrism (and other prejudices) into both men and women. We should still persevere. History has indeed shown that innate prejudices can be successfully countered. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/20 09:41 AM |
| 1 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?Fiamengo and Davison are superb. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/20 09:07 AM |
| 5 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?Juries don’t make mistakes? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/20 09:05 AM |
| 5 | Are there people here who actually think that Trump/Weinstein are innocent of sexual assault?The problems with the Trump and Weinstein cases: The media trials raise doubt about an unbiased verdict. The “evidence” is weak: https://www.thenation.com/article/society/weinstein-trial-rape-manhattan/ Too much is oath-on-oath: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4a8xw3/potential_argument_against_hesaidshesaid/ The Trump case(s) have undergone little to no cross-examination. The Weinstein case(s) ignore the possibility that the accusers were exacting revenge for Weinstein’s demanding a… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/20 09:00 AM |
| 1 | The narrative of universal historical female oppression is quite insulting to menUseful list. Thanks. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/20 08:46 AM |
| 1 | The narrative of universal historical female oppression is quite insulting to menRefutation of “women’s historical oppression,” still mostly valid: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/20 08:40 AM |
| 3 | NYC health department advising jewish ritual circumcisers to “use mouthwash” before they suck the blood from the infants penis to reduce the herpes risk. Meanwhile, a prick to the clitoris hood where you dont remove anything is illegal. Why the double standard?Realistically, circumcision will never be banned. But a mandatory botch registry (including infections of any kind) could become a solid basis for campaigns to convince parents not to circumcise. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/20 08:21 AM |
| 2 | Asian man here. Some thoughts on my society expecting men to be married by a certain age.You made six defamatory allegations against an entire sub: bitter Toxic cesspools misogynists things were great in the good old days men also become racists and claim that the problem is that women now have options. Worse, when called out for your defamatory allegations: You provided a claimed single example - without even a name - relevant to only one of the six allegations. in any case, you have a sample size problem associated with false or invalid results. Learn some elementary statistics. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/20 05:33 AM |
| 1 | r/againstmensrights seems to claim that this sub is a echochamber of mysogony. I've seen mysogony here but most of it is downvoted to hell. What do they have against this sub?https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifeminism | /r/MensRights | 22/02/20 10:46 PM |
| 1 | r/againstmensrights seems to claim that this sub is a echochamber of mysogony. I've seen mysogony here but most of it is downvoted to hell. What do they have against this sub?Exactly! | /r/MensRights | 22/02/20 10:37 PM |
| 2 | r/againstmensrights seems to claim that this sub is a echochamber of mysogony. I've seen mysogony here but most of it is downvoted to hell. What do they have against this sub?They say that our sub has "hidden mysogonistic dog whistles." Had anyone ever even asked them what that means? First things first. Had anyone ever asked the nearest dog? | /r/MensRights | 22/02/20 10:36 PM |
| 2 | Asian man here. Some thoughts on my society expecting men to be married by a certain age.Sorry, this part of the analysis is misandrist nonsense: In the United States and Canada, there’s an increasing wave of frustrated men who are bitter that they don’t have a woman in their lives. Toxic cesspools of the internet like certain parts of Reddit are a breeding ground of such bitterness. Such men often become misogynists because they believe that things were great in the good old days before women started enjoying independence. Some of these men also become racists and claim that the pr… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/20 05:41 PM |
| 1 | Woman asked to leave barber shop b/c it has a 'no girlfriend or wives policy.' Owner tells ABC news, "We want guys to be able to come in here and be guys and not have to worry what they say or what they talk about because there's a lady present."Rules made by alpha males often enforce female privilege and oppress beta males. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/20 10:41 AM |
| 3 | If You Want a Marriage of Equals, Then Date as Equals | Researcher surprised to find that while women want "equal" relationships with men, they also want men to ask them out, organise dates, pay for everything, initiate sex & propose marriage. And they don't see any contradiction in that.Over a century ago, Strindberg debunked “unpaid work”: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/7956/7956-h/7956-h.htm#link2H_4_0020 | /r/MensRights | 18/02/20 10:34 AM |
| 2 | If You Want a Marriage of Equals, Then Date as Equals | Researcher surprised to find that while women want "equal" relationships with men, they also want men to ask them out, organise dates, pay for everything, initiate sex & propose marriage. And they don't see any contradiction in that.this is has got nothing to do with rights. This has everything to do with rights. If you read the whole article, it’s a feminist telling men how it’s to be. When do men get their say? | /r/MensRights | 18/02/20 10:25 AM |
| 1 | If You Want a Marriage of Equals, Then Date as Equals | Researcher surprised to find that while women want "equal" relationships with men, they also want men to ask them out, organise dates, pay for everything, initiate sex & propose marriage. And they don't see any contradiction in that.Complete bullshit. A man does not enjoy wasting his hard-earned money on a woman uninterested in him. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/20 10:21 AM |
| 3 | If You Want a Marriage of Equals, Then Date as Equals | Researcher surprised to find that while women want "equal" relationships with men, they also want men to ask them out, organise dates, pay for everything, initiate sex & propose marriage. And they don't see any contradiction in that.The article is itself typical not of the author’s claimed objective of equality but of gynocentrism: Women’s issues and wants and attitudes receive endless attention, men’s issues wants and needs scant. Unintentionally, she revealed the truth about feminism and about herself. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/20 10:15 AM |
| 5 | Does anybody know exactly what warner bros is doing with the Amber Heard situation?OP is correct. Individual exceptions notwithstanding, society has a long history of asymmetric treatment of DV: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228350210_Gender_symmetry_in_partner_violence_The_evidence_the_denial_and_the_implications_for_primary_prevention_and_treatment Straus, Murray & Scott, Katreena. (2009). Gender symmetry in partner violence: The evidence, the denial, and the implications for primary prevention and treatment. Preventing partner violence: Research and evidence-base… | /r/MensRights | 13/02/20 09:49 AM |
| 5 | Domestic violence against men during the pre-modern era was surprisingly common; court records indicate that women may have assaulted family members more often than men didIn 1882, Maryland “revived” the practice of flogging those convicted of wife-beating: https://www.mdhs.org/underbelly/2013/10/03/only-the-instrument-of-the-law-baltimores-whipping-post/ | /r/MensRights | 13/02/20 09:23 AM |
| 1 | Hollywood's gender age gap exposed: Male actors nominated for Oscars are on average 21.5 years OLDER than their female peers. OP: OR it discriminates against young male actors, men have to work longer and harder to get nominated.Fair, but I think you could argue that this is the case for both genders. Certainly not. Actresses sell their sexuality and sexual parts far more commonly and blatantly than actors: Jolie appears stark naked in Gia. One "pop tart" appears naked on a wrecking ball. Many have worn see-through clothing to the Oscars. Even those who have not appeared completely naked, show off their breasts, thighs, buttocks, etc. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/20 06:53 AM |
| 2 | Hollywood's gender age gap exposed: Male actors nominated for Oscars are on average 21.5 years OLDER than their female peers. OP: OR it discriminates against young male actors, men have to work longer and harder to get nominated.Please see my comment above. A better wording for /u/Lorenz99's comment would be: Some women are shit actresses who only get where they are based on sexuality and not talent. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/20 09:04 PM |
| 1 | Hollywood's gender age gap exposed: Male actors nominated for Oscars are on average 21.5 years OLDER than their female peers. OP: OR it discriminates against young male actors, men have to work longer and harder to get nominated./u/Lorenz99 has a point, overlooked or disputed because of his choice of words: Too many young actresses (and other entertainers) substitute their bodies for talent and work, then are shocked when job offers dry up when they're older. Were males given to blaming "sexism" for all their problems, male actors would complain that they haven't as many opportunities as female actors to gain fame and fortune just by exposing their bodies (porn excepted, of course). | /r/MensRights | 09/02/20 09:03 PM |
| 4 | Hollywood's gender age gap exposed: Male actors nominated for Oscars are on average 21.5 years OLDER than their female peers. OP: OR it discriminates against young male actors, men have to work longer and harder to get nominated.Too many here have fallen for actresses' caterwauling. Keep in mind that feminism has convinced too many spoilt, modern women that any obstacle encountered to their least wish (in this case, to be the same sexpot box-office draw at 50 as at 25) must be the fault of men or of "sexist" society when it's their own fault. Older women are discriminated end their careers at 35 What bullshit. There are many older actresses: https://www.thewrap.com/actresses-over-50-who-rule-hollywood/ And among British… | /r/MensRights | 09/02/20 08:53 PM |
| 12 | Most central arguments of Feminism are not true or they are half-truths. Lying seems to be common although many must be just ignorant. How is it with this subreddit and MRAs in general?Actually, no. Men are assaulted at a much higher rate than women. One reason is that criminals think the male victim much more of a threat and the so first to be neutralised. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/20 10:26 AM |
| 7 | Feminists don't acknowledge due legal process.You’re assuming what was not proved - that he’s guilty. You’d make a good member of the KKK. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/20 08:25 AM |
| 3 | Lost Boys. Over 100 boys die unnecessarily in US as a result of circumcision.The title is fake news and should be removed before it discredits us. Circumcision is indeed a risk to health - especially in the massive incidence of unhygienic procedures in the third world - but the Bollinger study is a methodological farce. http://circumcisionnews.blogspot.com/2010/05/fatally-flawed-bollingers-circumcision.html I’ve noticed more reliable studies, but unfortunately most fail to distinguish trivial from catastrophic consequences. That’s why I’ve argued here that mandatory trac… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/20 11:47 AM |
| 1 | "Actor Laurence Fox will not date 'woke' women or those under 35"There is a common claim that young voters are much more "woke": https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/12/young-left-third-party/603232/ Young Americans demanding more power, control, and justice have veered sharply to the left. This lurch was first evident in the two elections of Barack Obama, when he won the youth vote by huge margins. And young Americans didn’t edge back to the political center under Obama; they just kept moving left. Obama won about 60 percent of voters younger than … | /r/MensRights | 20/01/20 02:40 PM |
| 14 | Look at this post almost over 50+ incels have killed themselves as shown on this post. I am not an incel in any way I have a loving girlfriend but this might show that incels might be a bit misrepresented on the internet.self-defeating ideology. What ideology? Misery and loneliness are not an ideology. Also, I think it’s fair to say that the average incel is a geeky, under confident guy who’s bad at self improvement and is prone to believing questionable things, Proof? And why are you blaming the victim? Why are women, and men who have mastered courting, so shockingly indifferent or hostile to the pain of the men who can’t? Why not criticise most women for still expecting courting effort from men and for treatin… | /r/MensRights | 17/01/20 12:07 PM |
| 5 | Look at this post almost over 50+ incels have killed themselves as shown on this post. I am not an incel in any way I have a loving girlfriend but this might show that incels might be a bit misrepresented on the internet.Those who post are not necessarily a representative sample and in fact are probably self-selected for particularly outspoken bitterness, anger or pathology. I suspect the majority of incels are decent human beings leading lives of quiet desperation, rendered miserable by their inability to conform to female expectations. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/20 11:56 AM |
| 11 | Look at this post almost over 50+ incels have killed themselves as shown on this post. I am not an incel in any way I have a loving girlfriend but this might show that incels might be a bit misrepresented on the internet.Nonsense. Most incels are decent human beings who simply do not have and cannot acquire the looks, money or manner women demand. Stop blaming the victims resulting from female objectification of men as physical, financial or fun objects. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/20 11:50 AM |
| 5 | i know this blew up but this is ridiculous. 1920s women rights activism read a book.Indeed. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/el4b2m/how_many_women_are_really_feminist/fdgf7cj/ Sometimes I wonder whether feminism is merely the expression of a gynocentrism innate to both men and women - perhaps nature's way of compensating for superior male strength. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/20 03:50 PM |
| 3 | Feminist Academic Fraud and AbuseExcellent post. Isn't Mary Koss the creator of the methodological fraud under which the interviewer, not the woman interviewed, determines whether or not rape occurred? It was this method which opened the way to massive manipulation of survey results, at the whim of the "researcher". | /r/MensRights | 12/01/20 02:07 PM |
| 29 | 8 facts about American dads | Including the fact that dads work 4 hours per week more than moms when housework and childcare are included, debunking a common feminist whine about men.Warren Farrell has thoroughly debunked the housework and "unpaid work" lies in his book, Women Can’t Hear What Men Don’t Say. Just two examples of methodology errors in which studies understate male work: Many omit men's work on "honeydo" lists. Many count play with a child, taking a child to a sporting event, etc, as "childcare" when done by a mother, but as "leisure" or "recreation" when done by a father. The "unpaid work" lie was shredded by Strindberg more than a century ago. This informatio… | /r/MensRights | 12/01/20 01:26 PM |
| 3 | UK woman in Ayia Napa rape case to be pardoned by Cyprus president: reportTheir citation 6 apparently refers to her change of story. You should learn to read. There are hundreds of articles about the case, citing a video showing her having consensual sex. The video itself may even be posted. Your finding a pretext to ignore the video and rush to assert the confession “all there is” indicates your bad faith. The confession is only “shakey” by her claim. You swallow it. The boys’ testimony is also evidence. There is also DNA evidence. Absent posting of the whole dossier… | /r/MensRights | 08/01/20 12:25 PM |
| 1 | UK woman in Ayia Napa rape case to be pardoned by Cyprus president: reportThe conviction is probably justice: https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Freya_Heath https://falsevictims.com/fictim/433/freya-heath | /r/MensRights | 08/01/20 09:21 AM |
| 0 | Found in r/againstmensrights. They call this propaganda while these are statistics backed up by studies from Harvard Medical School. Some people just hate men.but when you look through this sub- it’s been populated by incels, feminists and a bunch of rants on fucking circumcisions. Please let us know when you get cancer, so we can pop open the champagne. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/20 08:04 AM |
| 1 | Found in r/againstmensrights. They call this propaganda while these are statistics backed up by studies from Harvard Medical School. Some people just hate men.Without proof, your comment is disgusting. MRA: “Men deserve equal rights.” Anti-MRA: “You must be a misogynist who hates women.” | /r/MensRights | 08/01/20 07:59 AM |
| -2 | Found in r/againstmensrights. They call this propaganda while these are statistics backed up by studies from Harvard Medical School. Some people just hate men.Sorry, feminism was never about equal rights. Feminism was always about female supremacism, including accumulating privileges without equivalent responsibility. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/csai5i5/ | /r/MensRights | 08/01/20 07:52 AM |
| 0 | Found in r/againstmensrights. They call this propaganda while these are statistics backed up by studies from Harvard Medical School. Some people just hate men.A clue to recognising a liar like /u/Tacticalsquirrel: Defamation in generalities with no specific evidence whatsoever. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/20 07:50 AM |
| -1 | Found in r/againstmensrights. They call this propaganda while these are statistics backed up by studies from Harvard Medical School. Some people just hate men.Aha. MR is a “fringe sub” to you. Thanks for proving your misandry and so discrediting your contentions. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/20 07:47 AM |
| 2 | Found in r/againstmensrights. They call this propaganda while these are statistics backed up by studies from Harvard Medical School. Some people just hate men.Absent proof, you have just defamed an entire sub. Nauseating. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/20 07:44 AM |
| 7 | How many women are really feminist?This. Most women love, benefit from, and support society’s gynocentrism even while denying they're feminist. If most women opposed feminism, it would disappear overnight. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/20 11:14 AM |
| 1 | Book Reference - Megan Fox - “Believe Evidence: The Death of Due Process from Salome to #MeToo”She used her female power (sexuality) to maneuver Herod into murdering John the Baptist: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salome In analogy, false MeToo accusations are women using their female power to destroy innocent men’s lives. | /r/MensRights | 04/01/20 01:44 AM |
| 1 | It would be dangerous to the mental health of a rape accuser to play a video that exonerates the 12 younger men falsely accused of rape.But clearly someone fucked you in the ass. Otherwise, why would you presume to judge any country by a few videos, while you remain thousands of miles away? You seem not to have noticed the USA itself contains mile after mile of urban decay and of rural poverty. So, you yourself live in a glass house, while throwing stones. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/19 08:23 PM |
| 1 | It would be dangerous to the mental health of a rape accuser to play a video that exonerates the 12 younger men falsely accused of rape.Your list of places you've lived does not seem to include France (nor any other European country), yet you still shoot off your mouth. You ought to heed the wisdom of the brilliant American, Twain: It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/19 08:19 PM |
| 1 | It would be dangerous to the mental health of a rape accuser to play a video that exonerates the 12 younger men falsely accused of rape.It's unclear what your racism has to do with the perp walk. Still, stats would seem to show the USA with at least as many problems as France: Murder rate per 100,000: France 10.54, USA 42.01 https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Violent-crime/Murder-rate-per-million-people Gini Index of Income Inequality: France 32.74, USA 40.81 https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Economy/Inequality/GINI-index Infant Mortality Rate - Deaths per 1000 Live Births: France 3, USA 6 https:… | /r/MensRights | 31/12/19 08:16 PM |
| 1 | It would be dangerous to the mental health of a rape accuser to play a video that exonerates the 12 younger men falsely accused of rape.... showing the problem is not restricted to dishonest women. It is also the result of twisted law and twisted jurists. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/19 08:39 PM |
| 5 | It would be dangerous to the mental health of a rape accuser to play a video that exonerates the 12 younger men falsely accused of rape.Excluding evidence is vile. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/19 07:48 PM |
| 11 | It would be dangerous to the mental health of a rape accuser to play a video that exonerates the 12 younger men falsely accused of rape.Supporting your point, she has changed her story more often than her shirt. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/19 07:47 PM |
| 41 | It would be dangerous to the mental health of a rape accuser to play a video that exonerates the 12 younger men falsely accused of rape.False. In fact, the “perp walk” so beloved by USA cops and media is considered a human rights violation in France, specifically out of concern for the innocent. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/19 07:38 PM |
| -1 | British woman, 19, could face prison after Cyprus court finds her guilty of lying about gang rapeThat’s the whole problem - someone did. :) | /r/MensRights | 30/12/19 07:33 PM |
| 0 | British woman, 19, could face prison after Cyprus court finds her guilty of lying about gang rapeGood article. Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/19 07:32 PM |
| 1 | Why men's issues will never be taken seriouslyBull. Western women have superior status, Western men inferior, beginning with mortal misandry in health and longevity and continuing with misandry in every aspect of society. See the extensive documentation by Nathanson and Young or by Benatar. Indignities done by Islam are not usually mortal and so pale by comparison, and are in any case not the fault of Western men. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/19 05:04 PM |
| 0 | British woman, 19, could face prison after Cyprus court finds her guilty of lying about gang rapeFor once, justice may prevail. But why is she not named? | /r/MensRights | 30/12/19 02:55 PM |
| 1 | This is not at all entitlement and sexism against men...I agree. Yet it could be easily fixed, simply by prefixing "Parody of Valenti:" to the title. | /r/MensRights | 27/12/19 07:47 PM |
| 34 | Why men's issues will never be taken seriouslyI disagree. Sexism against men kills. Sexism against women is mostly non-existent or trivial. | /r/MensRights | 27/12/19 04:35 PM |
| 37 | Why men's issues will never be taken seriouslyDivorce courts have male film stars pay tens of thousands of USD monthly to already-rich ex-wives. | /r/MensRights | 27/12/19 04:34 PM |
| 13 | Why men's issues will never be taken seriouslyNo-fault divorce screws males just as badly as traditional divorce. Marriage in any form is a legal device for making the male slave to the female - a crime against humanity. | /r/MensRights | 27/12/19 04:30 PM |
| 1 | This is not at all entitlement and sexism against men...Pics like this shouldn't be allowed without a link to the article or archive version of the article. … It isn't even theoretical I disagree. Considering the millions of pages of lying feminist "opinion", fake "studies", etc, I'm not so sure OP is in the wrong. OP should simply have titled it, "To Paraphrase Valenti …" or "What if Feminists Spoke Honestly …" or "My Mockup of Valenti's Views …". OP's points stand. Please see my comment on this thread: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/e… | /r/MensRights | 27/12/19 03:31 PM |
| 1 | This is not at all entitlement and sexism against men...I disagree. Considering the millions of pages of lying feminist "opinion", fake "studies", etc, I'm not so sure OP is in the wrong. OP should simply have titled it, "To Paraphrase Valenti …" or "What if Feminists Spoke Honestly …" or "My Mockup of Valenti's Views …". OP's points stand. Please see my comment on this thread: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/efggd5/this_is_not_at_all_entitlement_and_sexism_against/fc0wz0c/ | /r/MensRights | 27/12/19 03:29 PM |
| 1 | This is not at all entitlement and sexism against men...Considering the millions of pages of lying feminist "opinion", fake "studies", etc, I'm not so sure OP is in the wrong. OP should simply have titled it, "To Paraphrase Valenti …" or "What if Feminists Spoke Honestly …" or "My Mockup of Valenti's Views …". OP's points stand. Please see my comment on this thread: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/efggd5/this_is_not_at_all_entitlement_and_sexism_against/fc0wz0c/ | /r/MensRights | 27/12/19 03:27 PM |
| 2 | This is not at all entitlement and sexism against men...do you really have to make something up? I disagree. OP should simply have titled it, "To Paraphrase Valenti …" or "What if Feminists Spoke Honestly …" or "My Mockup of Valenti's Views …". She didn't write such an article. So? It's an accurate paraphrase of feminist views. OP's points stand. Please see my comment on this thread: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/efggd5/this_is_not_at_all_entitlement_and_sexism_against/fc0wz0c/ | /r/MensRights | 27/12/19 03:25 PM |
| 1 | This is not at all entitlement and sexism against men...I disagree. OP should simply have titled it, "To Paraphrase Valenti …" or "What if Feminists Spoke Honestly …" or "My Mockup of Valenti's Views …". OP's points stand. Please see my comment on this thread. | /r/MensRights | 27/12/19 03:22 PM |
| 1 | This is not at all entitlement and sexism against men...Unless I err, hate speech in the UK can be subject to criminal prosecution. Valenti has spent a lifetime in anti-male hate speech. She belongs in prison. Edit: In a search, I cannot find any such Valenti article. Nevertheless, OP's obvious points stand: Valenti is a leader of the worldwide hate-brigade of feminists destroying male lives. Valenti's feminism (and women generally) has no shame whatsoever in justifying female greed. Valenti's feminism (and women generally) want to destroy prenups so… | /r/MensRights | 25/12/19 07:25 PM |
| 4 | A compilation of evidence debunking feminist historical revisionism.Here are a number of references in support of OP and the other excellent comments on this thread: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ Notice in particular: Historians Bailey and van Creveld are invaluable, debunking much feminist misrepresentation of history. Bailey gives a wealth of detail about couverture. Coverture and similar schemes placing assets in a husband's hands, did so to place all the financial burden upon the-male (includi… | /r/MensRights | 25/12/19 05:29 PM |
| 1 | A baby's penis was being mutilated with a crowd spectating and an MRI proved the traumaThe intactivist obsession with Jewish circumcision, representing roughly 1% of worldwide incidence, appears vile prejudice to decent men and so defeats the intactivist objectives. The failure of the SF initiative is a case in point. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/19 07:47 AM |
| 1 | And men will fix roads, build cities, clean garbage, go deep into ground for necessary elements...when will my gender wake up? It's only getting worse!horde whored | /r/MGTOW | 15/12/19 02:24 AM |
| 1 | Watch something harmless get a guy reamedThis is all about the matriarchy preserving its power by crucifixion of any male who presumes to transgress even slightly the holy power of the female body. | /r/MGTOW | 15/12/19 01:19 AM |
| 2 | Watch something harmless get a guy reamedIt is a minor transgression. It justifies ostracism or low-level prosecution, not crucifixion. | /r/MGTOW | 15/12/19 01:15 AM |
| 3 | Watch something harmless get a guy reamedSorry, it is obscene and unjust for the law to define such minor transgressions as sexual assault. | /r/MGTOW | 15/12/19 01:12 AM |
| 1 | Just heard the latest feminist bsA number of Western countries/jurisdictions have absurd “rape by deception” laws. | /r/MGTOW | 15/12/19 12:15 AM |
| 1 | Definitive way to figure out if she's a man haterhttps://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/041213.Goodwin.gender.html | /r/MGTOW | 14/12/19 09:35 PM |
| 1 | The crap the women in my family post everyday on Facebook!https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11852887/Lawyer-accused-of-sexism-after-complimenting-barrister-on-stunning-LinkedIn-picture.html | /r/MGTOW | 14/12/19 08:04 PM |
| 1 | Christopher Hitchens on the barbarism of circumcision and how hundreds of boys die each year because of the procedure.Bollinger is Not a Reliable Reference: http://circumcisionnews.blogspot.com/2010/05/fatally-flawed-bollingers-circumcision.html | /r/MensRights | 11/12/19 12:14 AM |
| 3 | I call Bullshit on the False rape accusation sticky from Mens Lib sub. Actual lies are being told.My debunking of the often wrongly-cited FBI figures: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4w1z94/information_about_fbi_8_unfounded_accusation/ Kanin, McDowell, Fairstein, Craig Silverman, and the FBI (whose non-match rate was cited in the NYT as 36%) all indicate the likely false-accusation rate to be about 40% to 50%. Moreover, oath-on-oath proceedings should be considered inherently unreliable and thus a violation of the accused's human rights: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comme… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/19 11:21 PM |
| 3 | I am Male feminist and want a genuine reasoned debate with men’s rights activistsit’s just a large chunk of men do abuse women A bigoted generalisation for which you should apologise. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/19 10:51 AM |
| 2 | I am Male feminist and want a genuine reasoned debate with men’s rights activistsWow, the MGTOW sub just banned me for posting this there, disappointing to see free speech being removed. Thank you to everyone here who’s debated fairly. Wow, are you arrogant. Feminism is an evil philosophy which has destroyed lives. MGTOWs have seen it in action. So, why should they bother debating a committed feminist? Would an African-American bother debating a member of the Klan? | /r/MensRights | 04/12/19 10:48 AM |
| 1 | I am Male feminist and want a genuine reasoned debate with men’s rights activistsExcellent comment. Also valuable are Nathanson and Young’s several books about misandry. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/19 10:44 AM |
| 2 | I am Male feminist and want a genuine reasoned debate with men’s rights activistsWhat a scintillating and respectful response. You’re a troll. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/19 10:41 AM |
| 1 | Why Men can financially support/accept their partner but women only want men who are financially stronger than them?nor did any of my female friends. Your gf might have been an anomaly, but not all female friends. Thanks for confirming you’re lying. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/19 10:34 AM |
| 1 | Why Men can financially support/accept their partner but women only want men who are financially stronger than them?Sorry, I don’t believe you. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/19 10:31 AM |
| 2 | My mother is emotionally abusiveFor your own good, you should try to be allowed to live with your father or stepfather. I’m not sure the best way to do so, but it couldn’t hurt to be calmly and rationally vocal (to the courts, to therapists, etc) about your wishes, needs, and welfare, and about the reasons your father or stepfather could better care for you. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/19 10:25 AM |
| 1 | Document exposes knowledge of years of botched circumcisionsI’m circumcised and I’m fine though... Careful - stating the truth so baldly may provoke fits of intactivist rage and religious bigotry. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/19 09:54 AM |
| 8 | The Atlantic: Emasculated Men Refuse to Do Chores—Except CookingDon’t trust the stats. Warren Farrell has written extensively about the male work omitted from the stats. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/19 09:08 AM |
| 2 | Document exposes knowledge of years of botched circumcisionsAny real stats in there? Pushing for a ban is too big a first step and has failed. Botch registration is a more solid first step. Cold, dispassionate analyses from detailed botch registries, compiling data on every botch or even every circumcision, would be a better tool to convince public and governments than too-evident preaching. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/19 12:03 PM |
| 7 | He was a 12-year-old rape victim... and still had to pay child support.One of the major problems MRAs are reluctant to acknowledge, is that women favour women regardless of truth or morality: https://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/041213.Goodwin.gender.html | /r/MensRights | 02/12/19 11:58 AM |
| 9 | He was a 12-year-old rape victim... and still had to pay child support.Wrong. Female rapists often retain custody. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/19 11:55 AM |
| 1 | Labor distribution by genderThe comments (below the chart) are atrocious. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/19 03:01 AM |
| 2 | Feminist Andrew Yang says Men who work to feed, house, and pamper their wives are stealing laborSome points often ignored by feminist society: Men's household labour is systematically under-counted. Warren Farrell has written essays and books about this. When household labour, childcare, and income-earning are all fairly counted, men generally put at least as much effort as women - and often more - into the family. Women's household labour is not "unpaid". It is paid luxuriously. Women in living-together arrangements are essentially receiving the benefits of half of the male's income. Many… | /r/MensRights | 26/11/19 05:50 PM |
| 2 | I’m female and I don’t agree with these PA house bills that will most likely cause serious legal and personal problems for a lot of actual innocent men who will get targeted by any female that they may have pissed off in their past......I can see no good coming from this if passed.Please let us know when you get cancer, so we can pop open the champagne. Thanks to OP for her great post. | /r/MensRights | 23/11/19 01:47 AM |
| 6 | Addressing a few foundational assumptions of feminist theory.Supporting OP, see https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ | /r/MensRights | 19/11/19 08:25 AM |
| 15 | Your take on Hateful MRA's, and what can we do differently?the men's rights movement is going to get labelled as a hate movement no matter what we do. This. MR: “Men are human beings and deserve equal rights.” Opposition: “So you’re a sexist, misogynist, woman-hating pig.” | /r/MensRights | 15/11/19 08:54 AM |
| 4 | Your take on Hateful MRA's, and what can we do differently?Sorry, I don’t think it legitimate. | /r/MensRights | 15/11/19 08:51 AM |
| 1 | A woman accused trump of rape. He called her a liar. Now she’s accusing him of defamation.People have always been allowed to sue each other for damages. But denying criminal guilt should not be interpreted as defaming an accuser and should not be grounds for circumventing the statute of limitations. Innocence until proved guilty is a hallowed principle within the criminal court, it does not apply outside. Of course it applies outside. Anything else is barbaric. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/19 01:07 AM |
| 2 | My ex-girlfriend is saying I pressured her into sex. Turning my friends against meThe lying revenge of a woman scorned is not new and not just modern feminism but rather has been known since ancient times. Potiphar’s wife and Phaedra are famous examples of the ancients’ recognition of some females’ use of false allegations of sexual impropriety to vengefully destroy innocent men's lives. Little has changed since then - false accusers are believed and not punished. OP would be well-advised to keep his counter-proofs forever. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/19 10:56 AM |
| 7 | Kansas Prosecutors To Drop False Rape Charges For Fear Real Victims Won’t Come ForwardThe article’s author, Ashe Schow, has a long history of supporting men and men’s issues. We should. support her journalism career in return. inquire whether she’d be willing to speak to an MR group or to ICMI. try to help her get speaking engagements. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/19 10:03 AM |
| 2 | A woman accused trump of rape. He called her a liar. Now she’s accusing him of defamation.Wrong. There are no perfect men and no perfect victims. Waiting for a perfect case means waiting centuries. Trump deserves as much due process as any other male. Or are only saints to be presumed innocent? Liars are not necessarily rapists. Does a husband who lied to his wife about an affair, deserve to be presumed guilty of the revenge charge of spousal rape? | /r/MensRights | 06/11/19 09:50 AM |
| 1 | A woman accused trump of rape. He called her a liar. Now she’s accusing him of defamation.She wins by publicity for herself and her book and by potential payment to go away | /r/MensRights | 06/11/19 09:45 AM |
| 3 | A woman accused trump of rape. He called her a liar. Now she’s accusing him of defamation.You’re right - the damage far surpasses this individual case. Now, not only can a false accuser malign an innocent male, she can sue for defamation should he claim himself innocent. Thus, if he says nothing, it will be interpreted as guilt - but if he denies, he gets sued and dragged into discovery. This is a tactic to turbocharge already-false accusations, to circumvent statutes of limitations, and to further bury the hallowed principle of innocence until proved guilty by evidence. Society and … | /r/MensRights | 06/11/19 09:44 AM |
| 1 | Double Standards & Hypocrisy on Steroids: "Katie Hill, Done In by the Perfect Storm of Misogyny, Sexism, and Uptight Boomer Values"Good point. forced to resign for similar offenses For the men, offence isn't even a required element. MIT's Richard Stallman was forced to resign simply for incorrect opinions. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/19 03:36 PM |
| 11 | Double Standards & Hypocrisy on Steroids: "Katie Hill, Done In by the Perfect Storm of Misogyny, Sexism, and Uptight Boomer Values"Also funny: Banging a subordinate is unforgivable, and a man who does so must by destroyed, if the culprit is male, such as Matt Lauer or Peter Martins. But banging a subordinate is forgivable and/or criticism misogynist, if the culprit is female, such as Katie Hill or Tamara Rojo. Of course, things are worse in the Anglo-Saxon countries, due partially to a Puritan tradition. Even an academic feminist, Laura Kipnis, was investigated for simply arguing back: http://laurakipnis.com/wp-content/uplo… | /r/MensRights | 02/11/19 02:42 PM |
| 2 | Gender Bias in Our Family Court System - Fathering MagazineThanks to you for your support and to OP for an excellent article. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/19 07:41 AM |
| 3 | The End of Men’s Magazines - and of Masculinity?The import of the article may not be the magazines themselves - but instead a conservative publication supporting traditional masculinity, the foibles (such as cheesecake) of masculinity as part and parcel of a positive whole, and feminism as destructive, with many a point worthy of the best MR outlook. This suggests our views are becoming either mainstream or at least obvious to the mainstream. Hurrah! | /r/MensRights | 29/10/19 07:36 AM |
| 2 | Google & Plath: Is Google Worth a Giggle?The problem is the intense ideological perversion of her life into a tool of unbridled hatred: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylvia_Plath#Hughes_controversies | /r/MensRights | 28/10/19 03:14 AM |
| 1 | Large Philip Morris Advert in WSJ Touts Gender MythsAn excellent reference - thank you! It also leads to a Science Direct analysis of “Women directors, firm performance, and firm risk: A causal perspective”. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/19 01:02 AM |
| 1 | Health Insurance Algorithms Claimed to Discriminate against Blacks and WomenIt's also interesting that Volokh and other ostensibly competent reporters failed to note the just-issued stay only temporary: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judge-blocks-maine-student-s-suspension-over-note-about-rapist-n1072386 I hope the school board (or the defamed student) takes the case further. Of course, the school board must deal with an even bigger bully, the ACLU. The ACLU, long dedicated to feminism, deemed it must intervene to make female defamation of the male a matter of "fr… | /r/MensRights | 27/10/19 03:07 PM |
| 1 | Health Insurance Algorithms Claimed to Discriminate against Blacks and WomenWe've a master SJW bullshit artist here, folks! the studies that contain the answers Sorry, the studies contain no answers, just "social justice" philosophy as the court's admitted guiding principle, for which a pretext is then found. I don't intend to waste much time with a meretricious coprophage like yourself, so will just give an example: The first amendment covers much more than simple opinions, up to and including false statements of fact which the author had reasonable grounds to believe … | /r/MensRights | 27/10/19 02:26 PM |
| 1 | Health Insurance Algorithms Claimed to Discriminate against Blacks and WomenInteresting to see dissent re AM v Cape from Volokh's usual fan club - that is, rejection of Volokh's support for defamation as a tool of SJWs: Example 1: AmosArch Can we also post unsubstantiated notes in the school saying ‘Justin pooped his pants.’ or ‘There is a whore who sleeps with the teachers’? even if everybody will be able to figure out who its referring to? How about something like ‘There are rowdy Muslim students that need to assimilate’ or ‘women should go to their own school’ Maybe … | /r/MensRights | 27/10/19 08:47 AM |
| 2 | Health Insurance Algorithms Claimed to Discriminate against Blacks and WomenIndeed. Your comments simply parrot the mendacious misandry of the original material and fail to answer a single one of my questions. For example, the court decision in A.M. V Cape ignores facts it deems inconvenient: the accused was indeed known. A.M. claimed no knowledge, but she would, wouldn't she? honest people don't post anonymous accusations- they go to the police. a rape accusation is not simply an opinion. the school board was in the right. Simply declaring it in the wrong is not a fact… | /r/MensRights | 26/10/19 10:32 PM |
| 1 | Is it just me or there's a lot of interest for men coming from feminists and progressives?Yes, you did: You aren't going to change any of the above short of changing the species. That's both false and defeatist. | /r/MensRights | 20/10/19 09:42 PM |
| 1 | Is it just me or there's a lot of interest for men coming from feminists and progressives?In other words, you want to give up seeking justice for men because some (or even much) gynocentric behaviour may well be innate? | /r/MensRights | 20/10/19 08:05 PM |
| 0 | Is it just me or there's a lot of interest for men coming from feminists and progressives?It may be in men's interest to elect the most macho, feminist-resistant men around, the Trumps rather than the Trudeaus. For example, a feminist US President, such as Hillary or a Trudeau-copy or another Obama, would never have rescinded the disastrous Dear Colleague letter. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/19 10:37 AM |
| 2 | Is it just me or there's a lot of interest for men coming from feminists and progressives?It's interesting that Tinder became the very same gynocentric setup as the earlier, non-digital pairing methods, such as classifieds and singles bars, | /r/MensRights | 18/10/19 10:30 AM |
| 1 | Is it just me or there's a lot of interest for men coming from feminists and progressives?You aren't going to change any of the above short of changing the species. The best you can hope to do is nudge behaviors in one small direction or another, but the same base patterns will always manifest. You're right that much of gynocentrism is innate in men and women, but you're wrong about the possibility of change. Racism, homophobia, and religious intolerance are also innate to some extent, and had murderous consequences for millennia. Yet, they're now being largely (if gradually) pushed … | /r/MensRights | 18/10/19 10:25 AM |
| 1 | "Women are struggling to find men who are financial equals"What implicit gender bias? If men are leaving the field, it means they see better (if perhaps more strenuous) opportunities elsewhere. The female employees are free to do exactly the same. The lower pay may be related to the female reluctance to jump jobs; they value stability and low risk, while men take greater risk for greater pay. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/19 12:26 AM |
| 3 | My friend is on the verge of suicideThe responses here are shockingly callous. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/19 12:22 AM |
| 1 | "Women are struggling to find men who are financial equals"What was the order? Shift, then decrease? Or decrease, then shift? Men need income to survive and attract mates. Did males perceive a trend of decrease and so migrate out? Also, be wary of the frequent confusion among researchers of correlation for causation: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6sh60o/diversity_company_growth/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4seniz/potential_refutation_of_women_company_growth/ | /r/MensRights | 10/10/19 07:36 AM |
| 2 | Turning the tanker: My strategy for working within the current system.Both OP and /u/RPdOF may be right simultaneously. It's not always predictable what will work. It's fine if some try one way, some another. It's hedging our bets. Both are a form of woke resistance, provided (in OP's approach) one remembers one's identity and objective without getting sucked into SJW nonsense. OP's approach may be what SJW's mean by entryism. It just might work for us. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/19 07:59 AM |
| 3 | Turning the tanker: My strategy for working within the current system.The problem is that we've been dehumanized in their eyes. We aren't individuals with hopes, dreams, things to care about, and things that we want to accomplish to them. We're plastic mannequins at the clothing store. I suspect we've been dehumanised not just recently but since the dawn of time. Nature may have built gynocentrism into the human animal, male and female. They need the reminder that we are people. A reminder is usually insufficient. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/19 07:34 AM |
| 2 | Could New Weinstein Accuser Have Simply Walked Away?MIT's Stallman was forced to resign for merely suggesting Giuffre might have slept with Minsky willingly. So it's unlikely any of these women will be cross-examined, much less punished if lying. | /r/MensRights | 07/10/19 10:29 PM |
| 3 | Could New Weinstein Accuser Have Simply Walked Away?The DSM defines pedophilia as 13 or under. Epstein was convicted of age 17 and indicted for age 14 and not yet convicted. Thus pedo is inaccurate. 14 is age of consent in Germany, Japan, China, Italy, and much of Latin America. It's also old enough in many jurisdictions to get an abortion without parental consent. If it's old enough to decide abortion, its old enough to know not to return to an Epstein residence. But Doe and Araoz returned dozens of times. | /r/MensRights | 07/10/19 04:44 PM |
| 3 | Could New Weinstein Accuser Have Simply Walked Away?Or maybe it's women trying (often successfully) to have their cake and eat it, too. Get money and career advancement and victimhood at the same time - and now even more money via lawsuit. | /r/MensRights | 07/10/19 04:39 PM |
| 6 | Brittany Sellner: The War On MenOverall, it's hard to know what to think of Pettibone-Sellner and her sister: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Brittany_Pettibone https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-60088.html Her fiancé is no bargain: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Sellner | /r/MensRights | 06/10/19 02:54 PM |
| 2 | Dershowitz Has Helped Men's Rightshttps://www.indiatoday.in/india/north/story/false-rape-cases-in-delhi-delhi-commission-of-women-233222-2014-12-29 A trend among women filing false rape cases stands exposed with the Delhi Commission of Women (DCW) revealing shocking statistics showing that 53.2% of the rape cases filed between April 2013 and July 2014 in Delhi were found 'false'. | /r/MensRights | 06/10/19 02:04 PM |
| 1 | "Women are struggling to find men who are financial equals"face value ... high brow Indeed, we've always known a woman's face had high value, able to "open doors with just a smile". But I'd no idea the value affected by the height of the brows ..... ;-} | /r/MensRights | 06/10/19 01:56 PM |
| 1 | The real truth behind "Believe Women" that no one will ever acknowledge"Don't Trust Men" is the pretext for single-sex transport worldwide: https://www.google.com/search?q=single-sex+transport | /r/MensRights | 29/09/19 07:26 PM |
| 1 | Dershowitz Exposes Lies by Epstein Accuser Roberts-GiuffreWrong. You've fallen for the hype. Your vague "others" consist of histrionic females playing the sex card for notoriety, a better chance to sell a book, and a better chance to get a portion of Epstein's hundreds of millions. As for the butler, he is now dead, but openly had mercenary motives. His much-hyped "black book" is here. Contrary to hype by media, by the vile Boies, and even by Turley, the link shows: The book is little more than a broker's phone list. It has an entry or two for "Massage… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/19 02:45 PM |
| 1 | Misandry vs sexismAnd misandry, unlike sexism, doesn't advance the feminist world-view. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/19 11:13 AM |
| 1 | Misandry vs sexismThe chances of MR taking control of the word sexism are nil. This thread is a symptom of MR navel-gazing. And propagating the word sexism is suicidal. Reverse sexism and misandry are both reasonable terms. Trying to redefine sexism is not. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/19 11:10 AM |
| 1 | Misandry vs sexismMR is not new. It has existed for a century or more. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/19 11:07 AM |
| 1 | Misandry vs sexismMisandry does not support feminism. It is a correct word for hatred of males, found in any dictionary. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/19 11:06 AM |
| 1 | Misandry vs sexismNo, it isn't. It's suited to conveying and magnifying the feminist message. Why would we want to do so? At least the word misandry does not per se feed feminist goals. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/19 11:04 AM |
| 2 | Misandry vs sexismUse of the word sexism by MRAs would be suicidal. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/19 11:01 AM |
| 1 | Misandry vs sexismI disagree. Sexism is assumed anti-female. Our proving rampant (anti-male) sexism would just feed feminism. Further, if feminism can invent words such as sexism and mansplaining, we should at least be able to use and spread real words such as misandry. Nathanson and Young haven't titled their 4 books about "sexism" but about "misandry". | /r/MensRights | 25/09/19 10:59 AM |
| 1 | The lack of self awareness is ironic. People talk about how height doesn't matter much for men, and then turn around and say things like this...Bull. Men are objectified by height, muscularity, income, etc. That's as much a gender issue as objectification of women. The post by "one woman" makes men's physical objectification clear even though society denies it. It's the exception which proves the rule. I think dating sites include height and income to make it easier for women to exclude short or poor men. Imagine if the sites were to include breast size. And the false refrain of "not MR" gets tiresome. Stop trying to censor others' issu… | /r/MensRights | 25/09/19 06:50 AM |
| 1 | Should DNA Testing be mandatory?Actually, Canadian independence was achieved principally in 1867 but not fully until 1982. Maybe US independence would have taken just as long, without French help. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/19 10:05 AM |
| 2 | Friendly reminder: Show female MRAs some love.That's not what /u/goodmod implies. MR affects the well-being of men, women, straight men, gay men, black men, white men, LGBTQRSXYZ men - and the women close to, lovers of, friends of, or family of those men. Having strong MR supporters from all those groups - not by PC quota-like design but simply by accepting valid and meritorious random arrivals - gives individuals in the general public "someone to relate to" in MR. That's invaluable in getting our message out. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/19 09:40 AM |
| 2 | Friendly reminder: Show female MRAs some love.Why not a reasonable balance? Some women, such as Karen particularly, have put so much work into men's rights that it would be churlish not to acknowledge and appreciate that contribution. That doesn't mean reducing MR representation to just females. It means simply welcoming and appreciating contribution according to content and quality, not according to gender either way. As it should be. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/19 09:22 AM |
| 2 | Friendly reminder: Show female MRAs some love.In theory, you're right. But we have to be practical. Female MRAs are a tremendous help, and a number are brilliant. Karen Straughan and Cassie Jaye and Christina Sommers have done very well, perhaps even more so than men could have. I, for one, appreciate them. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/19 10:27 PM |
| 3 | Friendly reminder: Show female MRAs some love.I've suggested an award for certain of our prominent female allies: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/39z669/womens_recognition_award/ | /r/MensRights | 23/09/19 10:24 PM |
| 1 | What bs is thisIt looks lo OP deleted the post so there is nothing I can do about it. Understood. OP may have been embarrassed by all the criticism. Maybe we shouldn't all be too harsh on badly-phrased posts, since an interesting discussion can still result. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/19 11:35 PM |
| 3 | Law School textbooks recognizing the issue of false accusations in sexual assault cases!The text keeps referring to alleged victim when it should say accuser instead. Worse, it seems to think the case should turn on the "character" of accused vs accuser. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/19 04:17 PM |
| 1 | Law School textbooks recognizing the issue of false accusations in sexual assault cases!Sexual assault convictions don't really require proof, just accusation. I've argued reasonable doubt inherent to oath-on-oath cases: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4a8xw3/potential_argument_against_hesaidshesaid/ | /r/MensRights | 22/09/19 04:14 PM |
| 1 | Fact Checking Feminist Claims About False Rape Accusations: Part 3Excellent work by the site author. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/19 02:19 PM |
| 1 | Famed Computer Scientist Richard Stallman Described Epstein Victims As 'Entirely Willing' (VICE)Stallman said his friend Minsky might not have known had Epstein directed Giuffre to sleep with Minsky. Thus Minsky might have assumed her approach to him consensual and willing. And we don't know if Minsky accepted or declined. The media headlines mislead. Stallman was defending Minsky, not Epstein. And Stallman was right that Giuffre may have been willing; she was being paid thousands by Epstein to be a willing prostitute. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/19 01:38 AM |
| 1 | Famed Computer Scientist Richard Stallman Described Epstein Victims As 'Entirely Willing' (VICE)What actions? There's no proof Minsky did anything wrong. Giuffre may have been lying to sell a book. Further Minsky taught hundreds of adult female students, better-looking than Giuffre, and some of whom might have welcomed an affair, yet Minsky never succumbed. So why would he need Giuffre? | /r/MensRights | 21/09/19 01:35 AM |
| 1 | Famed Computer Scientist Richard Stallman Described Epstein Victims As 'Entirely Willing' (VICE)False. He was never convicted of pedophilia, which the DSM defines as 13 and under. He pled to soliciting prostitution from a 17 year old and had served his time by 2011. The left wants time-completed felons to get back all rights including the vote, so why shouldn't that include donating in 2014, after he completed his sentence (and before new indictment)? MIT should not have hidden the donation, because there was nothing wrong with it. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/19 01:30 AM |
| 1 | Our friend tells us why #MenAreTrash is a good thing (hint: it's because you're evil)Nathanson and Young's books on Spreading Misandry and Legalising Misandry are excellent. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/19 09:18 AM |
| 3 | Should DNA Testing be mandatory?Thank you for your support! You may be interested in attending next year's International Conference on Men's Issues or in talking to the Honey Badgers: https://icmi2019.icmi.info/index.html#about https://honeybadgerbrigade.com/honey-badger-brigade-mission-statement/ | /r/MensRights | 19/09/19 09:06 AM |
| 1 | Should DNA Testing be mandatory?He often shouldn't. Verifiable means a mandatory DNA test for all births. A man should not have responsibility for children borne against his will, especially if pregnancy fraud or paternity fraud committed by the mother. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/19 08:57 AM |
| 3 | Should DNA Testing be mandatory?It remains true that the USA owes its existence to France. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/19 08:52 AM |
| 1 | Should DNA Testing be mandatory?Not exactly. A court order is required. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/19 08:50 AM |
| 1 | The ‘Cancel Culture’ has destroyed one of the most profound technology leaders of our time from MITSorry, every accused deserves a defence, and every accuser a cross-examination. These are bedrock principles of civilisation. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/19 10:38 PM |
| 2 | The ‘Cancel Culture’ has destroyed one of the most profound technology leaders of our time from MITThat's medieval star-chamber "reasoning": We don't have guilt by association anymore. Minsky has not been shown to have had any knowledge of Epstein's activities. Stallman wasn't defending Epstein, as the false and defamatory mob headlines screamed. He was defending Minsky. There is zero evidence Minsky slept with Giuffre, beyond Giuffre's self-serving accusation. There is a strong probability that Giuffre is lying. She was trying to sell a book. Her editor suggested she spice it up by alleging … | /r/MensRights | 17/09/19 09:46 PM |
| 1 | The ‘Cancel Culture’ has destroyed one of the most profound technology leaders of our time from MITYes. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/19 09:45 PM |
| 4 | Breaking down London's new program of exempting women from prison.Good post. Hillarious made a similar proposal during the last US election, in an oped in USA Today, with little public objection. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/19 09:43 PM |
| 6 | Breaking down London's new program of exempting women from prison.But few men object to female privilege. I'm coming to think nature made gynocentrism innate to both men and women. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/19 09:41 PM |
| 1 | Many US women say 1st sexual experience was forced in teensrespondents reported experiencing forced sexual initiation In other words, the study took respondents' word for it. For whatever reason, nature or society seems to have programmed females to be ashamed of promiscuity. That's why retroactive retraction of consent is so common; feeling shame afterwards, the female may say (and may even convince herself) that she was coerced. The study is useless; it had no way to distinguish whether coercion actually occurred or whether the respondent was ashamed … | /r/MensRights | 17/09/19 09:40 PM |
| 1 | What bs is thisCan we have the OP's content back? Without it, the 245 comments make little sense. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/19 09:38 PM |
| 7 | After adding 'Time's Up' lawyers to her team, ACLU also wants to join and defend Amber Heard in Johnny Depp's defamation case against her.The ACLU has long been an organisation dedicated to feminism and to advancing feminism. It deliberately does not distinguish women's rights from civil liberties. https://www.aclu.org/other/aclu-and-womens-rights-proud-history-continuing-struggle But in the Depp-Heard case, it seems to have reached new levels of corruption. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/19 10:53 AM |
| 1 | What bs is thisSome here may be unduly criticising OP. Males seek help for depression less often and so are diagnosed less often. That doesn't necessarily mean they experience less, only perhaps that they report less. They may soldier on, living lives of quiet desperation. Higher pressures on men may be reason at once for more depression yet less reporting. There may also be lesser tolerance for men reporting; broken men aren't attractive to women. Finally, successful suicide certainly indicates severe depress… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/19 10:22 AM |
| 2 | Debunking the Enliven Project Manipulated statistics on false accusations.The FBI's 8% figure is usually misinterpreted. I tried to analyse it here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4w1z94/information_about_fbi_8_unfounded_accusation/ | /r/MensRights | 15/09/19 06:41 PM |
| 6 | ADL re: Iceland's proposed ban on circumcision aka "It sure would be a shame if someone called you a Nazi."The ADL could have taken a more nuanced position. Not everything is anti-semitism. The letter does say "anti-Semitism was surely not the impetus". Their argument seems to be more, "Neo-Nazis will support this, so Iceland shouldn't." It's a tempest in a teacup on both sides: From the MR viewpoint, the Jews represent less than 1% of the incidence of circumcision and so are irrelevant. The incidence due to Islam is 50 times greater. From the religious viewpoint, no country has yet passed a ban, and… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/19 06:46 AM |
| 1 | Game creator’s suicide after feminist Zoe Quinn accuses him of abuse shows peril of Twitter trials — RT Op-edWe have women who are some of the strongest supporters and allies of the MRM. Yes, all two dozen of them. We have women denouncing feminism and leaving it. Of course, now that female supremacy and feminist governance have been achieved. Sorry, I think you and /u/Aracnida are not being realistic. And I'm not discounting the efforts of pro-male women. In fact, I long ago suggested recognising them especially, here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/39z669/womens_recognition_award/ Howev… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/19 11:59 PM |
| 2 | Game creator’s suicide after feminist Zoe Quinn accuses him of abuse shows peril of Twitter trials — RT Op-edI took /u/DJ-Roukan's "Gamergate was a hoax" to mean preferential reviews happened and Quinn's responses/claims were a hoax. Have I misinterpreted? | /r/MensRights | 12/09/19 11:57 PM |
| 6 | Game creator’s suicide after feminist Zoe Quinn accuses him of abuse shows peril of Twitter trials — RT Op-edOver the years, RT has published more than one article highlighting abuse of men's human rights. I've no idea of the motivation, but it's ludicrous to see more consciousness of men's issues in RT than in the Guardian or NYT. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/19 10:16 AM |
| 8 | Game creator’s suicide after feminist Zoe Quinn accuses him of abuse shows peril of Twitter trials — RT Op-ednot all women, not even most. Shut up). That's hiding your head in the sand. If most women wanted feminism stopped, it would stop instantly. Generally, most women defend the human rights of men close to them but seem indifferent to the human rights of remaining males. The Straughans and Sommers - women dedicated to the humanity of men - are a minority. As the Purdue-Rutgers study showed, most women favour women. Gamergate was a hoax, and I have to believe this was also. She lives in chaos, comfo… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/19 10:09 AM |
| 4 | Ragebait scam happening now on 4chan and reddit theaters 'single males' policyThe 4chan sign may be fake, but some airlines have indeed discriminated against adult males in seating policy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airline_seating_sex_discrimination_controversy And some cities' ban on unaccompanied adults in or near park playgrounds will disproportionately affect men: https://www.nrpa.org/parks-recreation-magazine/2015/march/park-playground-ban-on-adults-unaccompanied-by-children/ | /r/MensRights | 07/09/19 09:28 PM |
| 1 | Christian Hoff Summers on Bill Maher.When was feminism ever actually needed? | /r/MensRights | 07/09/19 08:54 PM |
| 10 | Scarlett Johansson: "I believe Woody Allen." Is the vileness that is MeToo finally coming to an end?Mia Farrow belongs in prison. She filed false police reports by forcing the daughter into a manipulated video, Mia suborned perjury, falsified evidence, committed child abuse, and intimidated a witness intimidated witnesses by trying to force two nannies to lie. Both nannies said they were present and no molestation took place. lied by saying Allen molested the child in the attic when he's notoriously claustrophobic. abused son Moses for contradicting her lies. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/19 08:12 AM |
| 10 | Peter Ellis died. A sad ending to a New Zealand story of absolute travesty and injusticeProgressivism/feminism finds a new pretext for hysteria each decade. The child molestation hysteria was widespread: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-care_sex-abuse_hysteria Credit Dorothy Rabinowitz of the WSJ for op-eds and a book denouncing the hysteria. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/19 07:29 AM |
| 1 | Epstein's victims arrive at court to speak out at dramatic hearingThis. | /r/MensRights | 02/09/19 06:25 AM |
| 1 | Epstein's victims arrive at court to speak out at dramatic hearingSorry, you're barbaric. Every accused deserves a defence. Hysterical media trials are in themselves a travesty of justice. Hiring teenage prostitutes is not and should not be treated as worse than some murders. OP is also correct - a rush to judgement is not conducive to justice. | /r/MensRights | 02/09/19 06:24 AM |
| 1 | It's Not Just Men: How a Ring of Women Allegedly Recruited Girls for Jeffrey EpsteinThe US attorney signed off on the Florida deal. The Federal decision to ignore the Florida deal may itself be illegal and in any case will make future plea bargains more difficult, since unreliable. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/jeffrey-epstein-s-once-secret-sex-offender-plea-deal-must-n1021471 | /r/MensRights | 02/09/19 06:21 AM |
| 2 | Fuck people like thisIn defence of the husband, many of us unconsciously absorb attitudes and terms of the society around us. It may or may not have affected his willingness to endure abuse. Remember also the complexity of divorce, in which he'd lose his children and undoubtedly have to deal with yet more drastic abuse via the legal system (accusations of spousal abuse, spousal rape, etc) - all good reason to hesitate to divorce. Let's hope his daughters (older now, from his statements) are wise and continue to supp… | /r/MensRights | 31/08/19 02:23 PM |
| 1 | Fuck people like thisI mistakenly thought OP's "fuck people" referred to the husband, when OP was actually (and rightly) referring to the wife. My mistake underlines the mods' emphasis on good, clear titles. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/19 02:19 PM |
| 1 | Fuck people like thisMy apologies!!! I completely misunderstood you. I'll modify my comment to indicate that. Yes, titles take work. It's not easy to convey important and complex issues in a short title. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/19 02:17 PM |
| 3 | NYT runs editorial putting a spotlight on how men face body image problems and that there is no male equivalent of feminist body positivity for them in society.She still talks about patriarchy. Let's not be deceived. One swallow does not a spring make. The NYT remains viciously misandrist and published this token article to use as a defence. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/19 07:53 AM |
| -1 | Fuck people like thisOP's title is the reason men are oppressed. Women show solidarity with each other, form organisations like the WSPU and NOW, and ensure every real or fabricated slight to a woman becomes a social or legal issue, a club with which to beat men into submission. So, what does OP do upon noticing an abused husband? OP says fuck the victim. No, OP, we should help the victim against his abuser. Edit: Belay the above comment. It turns out that I've completely misinterpreted the title. See below. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/19 07:20 AM |
| 1 | I'm a woman and I'm curious: What are the disavantages of being born a man?You'll find many details in the following: The lists and links here at the right -> Cassie Jaye's speeches and Red Pill documentary Karen Straughan's many videos on YouTube David Benatar's book, Second Sexism Kathleen Parker's book, Save the Males Paul Nathanson & Katherine Young's several books on misandry Warren Farrell's book, Myth of Male Power Norah Vincent's book, Self-Made Man | /r/MensRights | 28/08/19 04:26 AM |
| 2 | Letter from a trapped coal miner says goodbye to his wife, 1902Nonsense. The Triangle Shirtwaist fire gets so much attention because it's one of the few industrial disasters in which the majority of victims were women - lives society considers inherently more valuable than men's. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 11:19 PM |
| 1 | Weaponization of sexI've tried the "affirmative consent" thing, and frankly, it was like having a threesome with a lawyer. The sense of intimacy was completely destroyed and the experience was so unpleasant I truly am happier not to engage in sex. Also, women think it unromantic for the guy to ask. Asking turns them off. They want him to sense whether or not they're in the mood, without asking. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/19 10:25 PM |
| 1 | Jeanine Pirro LiesIt's in her 2019.8.17 programme. On FB, at about 6:20, she clearly claims "only castration", as broadcast: /watch/?v=2359390547471401&_rdr Here is the longer YouTube video of same date, which may or may not have been edited: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oXSakzwweRg The Fox video has her claim at about 7:55 et seq: https://video.foxnews.com/v/6074049886001/?playlist_id=1794108333001#sp=show-clips She asserts a predator "never overcomes his predilections". The fictional Law and Order says the sam… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/19 09:15 AM |
| 8 | Can we collect a list of Feminists and women who are supportive or sympathetic with the Men's Rights Movement?As I said, put not thy faith uncritically in the powerful. Halley is a big wheel behind governance feminism: https://www.google.com/search?q=governance+feminism https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt2121736 In other words, having achieved feminist government, Halley magnanimously finds one area (uni sex policy) in which males may have some of their human rights respected. However, neither she nor most of the Harvard signatories have any problem with feminism controlling the levers of state p… | /r/MensRights | 16/08/19 06:33 PM |
| 5 | Judge goes off on woman after cheering in courtI assert the good of society justifies an automatic paternity test for every birth. But some countries, such as France, make DNA testing illegal without a court order. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_paternity_testing#France | /r/MensRights | 16/08/19 10:15 AM |
| 2 | N.O.W. opposes accused male students suing their universities over alleged anti-male bias in campus Title IX hearings, labels them "just another way to bully survivors into being silent."You're right. The VAWA consists of massive government monies (from disproportionately male taxes) dispensed to fund feminist propaganda and lobbying groups. | /r/MensRights | 16/08/19 10:11 AM |
| 5 | Can we collect a list of Feminists and women who are supportive or sympathetic with the Men's Rights Movement?Here's my list: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/39z669/womens_recognition_award/ Others are Cassie Jaye, Kathleen Parker, Laura Southern, and the late Karen DeCrow. Be careful of the Harvard Law crowd. Some celebrate the advent of governance feminism (aka feminist government). | /r/MensRights | 16/08/19 09:56 AM |
| 5 | A day before P&G reported quarterly earnings, Gillette CEO, Gary Coombe , told Marketing Watch in an interview Losing customers over #MeToo campaign is 'price worth paying'. You read about the $8 billion write down. Did you hear about the $5 billion loss? Was he trying to get ahead of the media?Regardless of corporate accounting, Gillette and P&G upper management insisted upon continuing support for the advert and donating to feminist causes. I will never again buy a P&G product. Check for the logo. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Procter_&_Gamble_brands https://www.google.com/search?q=p%26g+logo | /r/MensRights | 14/08/19 08:07 AM |
| 7 | N.O.W. opposes accused male students suing their universities over alleged anti-male bias in campus Title IX hearings, labels them "just another way to bully survivors into being silent."The U.S. government should declare N.O.W. a terrorist organisation. (I can dream, can't I?) | /r/MensRights | 14/08/19 08:03 AM |
| 3 | The double standards on nakedness are strong hereSorry, women aren't idiots and are not "manipulated". That's a weasel word to blame others for their own decisions. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/19 10:39 PM |
| 1 | The Hamster WheelBut what if selfish gynocentrism is biologically built into women? Nature would have reasons for doing so. Suppose further that the human mind is decent enough to override the gynocentric instinct in 25% of women. That would justify NAWALT. But MGTOWs simply estimate the number differently, at say 5%. That would justify AWALT. Speculation and moralising and hating each other decides nothing. Analysis or scientific testing might be a better way to decide. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/19 11:33 AM |
| 2 | The Hamster WheelGood, but somewhere it should have one of the primary female weapons, "Using sex". | /r/MensRights | 12/08/19 11:17 AM |
| 2 | Why are young men so angry.Women would be shocked at how challenging life is for men Norah Vincent wrote a book about this, after living a year as a man. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/19 01:49 AM |
| 3 | Establishments that get rid of the mens bathrooms, replace them with GN bathrooms, and keep the womens bathrooms are stupid.Some of this has a component of Anglo-Saxon Puritanism. Restroom use has generally been less uptight and more "fluid" in France, Italy, etc. In any establishment in any country, if I deem the arrangement unfair to men, I simply let the manager know I'm leaving. As the customer, I owe the business no debate, only one line rejecting the arrangement as unfair to men. Then, I take my business elsewhere. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/19 11:21 PM |
| 1 | 3 Women Imprisoned in Iran for No Hijab and for "Propaganda". Does Western Feminism Care?Why would you feel the need to ask if western feminism cares? It was a rhetorical question. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/19 08:40 PM |
| 1 | Oh, my! A Female Columnist Admits Men Still Have to Make the First Moveif a girl likes you, she will happily and unconsciously make ALL the moves. Only rarely. I've seen many cases in which a girl in a fellow's crowd likes him for years yet makes no moves whatsoever. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/19 08:02 PM |
| 2 | How do you handle (relevant to this sub) depression?Excellent advice, to which I add just 1 belated item: Physical activity at any level is good for the mind and morale, whether alone or with friends or as a route to making friends. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/19 07:56 PM |
| 2 | Banned from r/MGTOW for saying that we shouldn’t hate womenFrom Karen, to Helen, to Cassey, and on down the line our most noted speakers are, in fact, women. They are noted precisely because they are (competent and sympathetic) women. Even in MR, it seems, women dominate. Unfortunately, they do not represent the majority of women, most of whom passively accept or even parrot feminism. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/19 06:56 PM |
| 2 | Banned from r/MGTOW for saying that we shouldn’t hate womenSorry, the two are not comparable. Since ancient times, men have made law punishing rape. However, there has been relatively little female opposition to feminism - hence its success. As women are and have long been the majority of the electorate, they have had the power to restrain feminism. But the opposite has happened - feminism has reached its goals and, every few years, goes further to find a new way to oppress men, with the general acquiescence of women. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/19 06:42 PM |
| 1 | The Myth of Women in the WorkplaceFeminists insist women are needed in power, to be fair to female subordinates. So shouldn't HR be required to be 50% male, to be fair when judging cases of alleged discrimination, harassment, etc? | /r/MGTOW2 | 28/07/19 12:49 AM |
| 3 | Banned from r/MGTOW for saying that we shouldn’t hate womenI disagree with this approach. If some men hate women, censoring or demonising them won't help. Their feelings should be discussed, analysed and even disputed but not demonised or suppressed. Would you just shut up a black who hates whites, or a Jew who hates Germans? I wouldn't. Men who are "woke" to the power imbalance and the falsity of feminism are already ridiculously splintered: MRAs, MGTOWs, TRPs, PUAs, fathers' rights, incels, mythopoetics, etc. More splintering will only exacerbate the … | /r/MensRights | 28/07/19 12:41 AM |
| 1 | Banned from r/MGTOW for saying that we shouldn’t hate womenI agree with your analysis. Women's sexual power over men was recognised even by the ancients - e.g., the Adam & Eve story. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/19 12:31 AM |
| 1 | Banned from r/MGTOW for saying that we shouldn’t hate womenDid you ask why you were banned? I suspect assuming or alleging that MGTOW "hate[s] women as a whole" strikes many in the sub as false and defamatory. (However, were I their mod, I might have asked you to phrase it differently rather than banning.). Two core concepts of MGTOW differ little from MR: There may be decent women, but how do you differentiate? You cannot simply ask a potential mate, Would you falsely accuse me during divorce/breakup? Even assuming you find a decent one, in a marriage … | /r/MensRights | 28/07/19 12:28 AM |
| 2 | 12 Racist, Sexist, Selfish men save another man from deathThe title is very suggestive of everything hardcore feminist say about any man. The title is sarcastic, you jenny. There is zero evidence to support that the men in the video are what the title states. The men in the video are risking their lives to save the life of another human being. This is a distinctly male endeavour; there are no women in the video, and women only rarely risk their lives to save men. If you can’t see that you are an idiot and one of those that has brought this sub down a f… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/19 11:07 AM |
| 3 | 12 Racist, Sexist, Selfish men save another man from deathI wasn’t trying to promote anti-feminism, Too bad. Feminism is a hate movement with the objective of female supremacy. Anti-feminism is a virtue which should be promoted in both men and women. I’m actually all for feminism (as long as it’s classical). "Classical" feminism is just as unfair, imbalanced, misandrist, and dedicated to female supremacy as "modern" feminism or any other type of feminism: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/typ… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/19 11:01 AM |
| 1 | 12 Racist, Sexist, Selfish men save another man from deathyou damn donkey! ... you two jackasses You just proved yourself wrong. First you said donkey, a gender-neutral term. Then you said jackass, which is a male donkey only, proving society's and your own tendency to misandrist, anti-male bigotry. Otherwise, as an insult, you'd have said jenny, a female donkey. Ergo, you think of males negatively. Ergo, the post has brought out your innate misandry. Ergo, the post is not only an MR post, but an excellent one. ;-} | /r/MensRights | 24/07/19 10:53 AM |
| 2 | 12 Racist, Sexist, Selfish men save another man from death/u/EricAllonde, excellent point! | /r/MensRights | 24/07/19 10:42 AM |
| 1 | 12 Racist, Sexist, Selfish men save another man from deathI may look like one but I still want this sub to remain relevant You can do that easily, by leaving. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/19 10:41 AM |
| 2 | 12 Racist, Sexist, Selfish men save another man from deathFrom the community rules directly, "/u/Exitbuddy1 is a gelded, misandrist censor." /s Men's rights are infringed upon, when men are portrayed in consistently negative terms by feminist society, with little to no praise of men's positive qualities. OP praises men's positive qualities and hence contradicts feminism. QED. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/19 10:40 AM |
| 4 | 12 Racist, Sexist, Selfish men save another man from deathIt for damn sure is. Feminism is the not-so-modern hate movement dedicated to denying human rights to the male half of humanity. If an MR sub cannot openly say or act anti-feminist, then it's worthless and has already lost not only the battle but the war. The video absolutely is a matter of men's rights, directly contradicting feminist notions that all men are evil, selfish, less selfless than women, ego-driven, etc. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/19 10:38 AM |
| 2 | We've all seen the "Anti Man-spreading" chair, but let me present to you the Anti Purse-Spreading Chair™! Equality and all thatNo guy followed her. One walked alongside her a few seconds while trying to figure out something clever enough to impress her. Many of us have been in that exact position - trying to figure out how to approach a woman who has already been approached by, and who has rejected, 56 other men. Often, we give up - and so did he. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/19 10:34 PM |
| 3 | We've all seen the "Anti Man-spreading" chair, but let me present to you the Anti Purse-Spreading Chair™! Equality and all thatSo I take it you often shop for groceries naked? | /r/MensRights | 21/07/19 03:33 PM |
| 2 | We've all seen the "Anti Man-spreading" chair, but let me present to you the Anti Purse-Spreading Chair™! Equality and all thatWrong. Nature built a physiological response into men. Women wearing revealing clothing are deliberately showing off and deliberately cock-teasing, the better to subjugate men. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/19 03:32 PM |
| 1 | We've all seen the "Anti Man-spreading" chair, but let me present to you the Anti Purse-Spreading Chair™! Equality and all thatBrilliant. Thanks! | /r/MensRights | 21/07/19 03:29 PM |
| 3 | How do you handle (relevant to this sub) depression?As others have said, keep busy. Try out TRP, PUA, MGTOW. They work for some people. Never blame yourself. It's feminism's fault, not yours. Join MR groups, such as NCFM. Attend the International Conference on Men's Issues. Let off steam here. Write letters to the editor. Find MR-oriented friends and even therapist to talk to. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/19 03:24 PM |
| 1 | We've all seen the "Anti Man-spreading" chair, but let me present to you the Anti Purse-Spreading Chair™! Equality and all thatI disagree. Without male pushiness, there'd be none of the hundreds of millions of happy couples. Shoshana Roberts' antics merely showed the contempt in which a spoilt little gender-rich kid held the male half of the human race. Many an older or less shapely female, and many a male, would have had the decency to be grateful to be noticed by the opposite sex. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/19 02:56 PM |
| 2 | We've all seen the "Anti Man-spreading" chair, but let me present to you the Anti Purse-Spreading Chair™! Equality and all thatAll bullshit. Women have always had supremacy over the subordinate male sex: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ | /r/MensRights | 21/07/19 02:51 PM |
| 1 | We've all seen the "Anti Man-spreading" chair, but let me present to you the Anti Purse-Spreading Chair™! Equality and all thatWomen have always had supremacy; feminists of the past achieved not equality but greater supremacy. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ | /r/MensRights | 21/07/19 02:48 PM |
| 2 | Sharon Stone Makes Her Stroke a Gender Issue"World to End, Women, Minorities Hardest Hit" | /r/MensRights | 21/07/19 01:04 PM |
| 1 | Megan McCain Slimes Dershowitz. Even Powerful Men Are Easily Destroyed by Female Accusations.She's his daughter - in other words, privileged. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/19 04:29 PM |
| 11 | This dude kills it. "Why would i want to enter into a legally binding arrangement with someone who "loves me" but hates men as a whole."Divorce isn't love and severely limits male perspective. And ~50% of marriages end in divorce. In almost all of those cases, the men entered marriage expecting no divorce. Optimism makes for an unrealistic crystal ball. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/19 09:18 AM |
| 9 | This dude kills it. "Why would i want to enter into a legally binding arrangement with someone who "loves me" but hates men as a whole."You haven't looked closely. I know unhappy marriages in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. Third-world women may often start off less demanding but learn quickly from their Western sisters. Btw, arranged marriages are apparently, on the average, neither more nor less stable, neither more nor less "happy" than "love" marriages. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/19 09:13 AM |
| 17 | This dude kills it. "Why would i want to enter into a legally binding arrangement with someone who "loves me" but hates men as a whole."OP is spot on. This isn't a MGTOW subreddit. You're either willfully naive or a misandrist piece of shit. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/19 09:02 AM |
| 10 | This dude kills it. "Why would i want to enter into a legally binding arrangement with someone who "loves me" but hates men as a whole."They may be happily married, but that's not the problem. The problem is that the marriage contract, as implemented by the courts, is a slavery contract allowing the female to deprive the male of human rights, liberty, and children at whim. The "happily-married" men simply haven't admitted their subjugation. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/19 09:00 AM |
| 5 | Feminists now want to restrict how men sitSilver lining: Each repost makes it less likely this bitch will ever have another (straight) date. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/19 08:54 AM |
| 7 | Feminists now want to restrict how men sitFeminism's true, supremacist nature is becoming more and more obvious. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/19 08:53 AM |
| 4 | How about you fuck off Huffington postFeminism is literally just about women. Not equality, or at least equality in a true sense. It's female supremacy. It always has been since around the 80's. It's female supremacy. It always has been since around the 80's. FTFY https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ | /r/MensRights | 19/07/19 08:46 AM |
| 6 | Female Supremist rant, would love to see comebacks from you lotThe rant is exactly the type of junk science beloved by the KKK and NSDAP, the true face of feminism. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/19 08:40 AM |
| 2 | Finally we're getting somewhereI've read of toddlers registered for taking a whiz against a tree in a park. | /r/MensRights | 12/07/19 11:21 PM |
| 1 | Finally we're getting somewhereI wonder: Is registration usually a lifetime sentence? Does registration exist anywhere for those who have completed their sentence for murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, or aggravated assault? If a discrepancy, why? | /r/MensRights | 12/07/19 11:18 PM |
| 1 | Teenager, 18, who tortured her ex-boyfriend by forcing him to drink urine from a dog bowl and crawl around on a dog lead is locked up for three yearsI'm not excusing her, where on Earth did you get that from? You seem anxious to excuse her. But, okay, I'll assume you're simply trying to explain the court's (erroneous) rationale. For many purposes, including major crime, 17 is legally an adult. She should receive the same sentence as her criminal cohorts or more; she stabbed him. She and Russell-Brookes then took turns to sit on his chest, and she began jabbing him to the chest with a knife. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/19 06:53 PM |
| 2 | Police pulled up on my girlfriend hitting me in the street and called her over to ask if she was okDump her immediately. If she already uses violence to control you, then it is likely at some point she'll try to destroy your life. The situation itself is a threat to your liberty and future. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/19 06:39 PM |
| 1 | PSA: How to find academic studies... reading the abstract doesn't mean you understand the study, and you'll come off as ignorant if you try to discuss it. Indeed. Additional reasons to link to the original study: The glosses seek sensational headlines, are often ignorant of statistics, and bear ideological bias, all resulting in misrepresentation of many studies. The studies themselves are dependent upon the grant process. So, they seek sensational conclusions, often use shady methodology and statistics, and bear ideological bi… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/19 10:00 PM |
| 1 | Teenager, 18, who tortured her ex-boyfriend by forcing him to drink urine from a dog bowl and crawl around on a dog lead is locked up for three yearsWrong. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_as_an_adult#England_and_Wales If a juvenile is charged with an offence that was committed alongside an adult, then both offenders will be tried in an adult magistrates' court, except if it is necessary in the interests of justice that they both be tried in Crown Court.[43] Juveniles may also be tried as adults in Crown Court for serious offences such as homicide, certain firearms offences, and grave crimes[44] (including sexual assault and child sex o… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/19 08:55 PM |
| 1 | Man's refusal to wear condom after agreeing to cancels out consent: judge. But read what the actual court report says — and how the news reports omit important facts. [Link in comments]Excellent rebuttal. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/19 08:50 PM |
| 3 | Teenager, 18, who tortured her ex-boyfriend by forcing him to drink urine from a dog bowl and crawl around on a dog lead is locked up for three yearsShe should get life in jail. No question. Yes, and her cohorts as well. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/19 02:02 PM |
| 1 | tattoo artist only serves females because “ men have everything “Charming. I think we must begin to acknowledge that nature seems to have built gynocentrism and even hatred of men into some portion of human females. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/19 01:41 PM |
| 4 | Teenager, 18, who tortured her ex-boyfriend by forcing him to drink urine from a dog bowl and crawl around on a dog lead is locked up for three yearsThere were multiple assailants. The article indicates the victim not in good health. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/19 01:37 PM |
| 1 | Teenager, 18, who tortured her ex-boyfriend by forcing him to drink urine from a dog bowl and crawl around on a dog lead is locked up for three yearsShe was 17. In many jurisdictions, 17 is well above age of consent and is often legally adult in matters of major crimes. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/19 01:36 PM |
| 8 | National Review Slut-Shames Leonard CohenIndeed, my point exactly. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/19 01:20 PM |
| 1 | Man's refusal to wear condom after agreeing to cancels out consent: judge. But read what the actual court report says — and how the news reports omit important facts. [Link in comments]It remains an oath-on-oath case. That is, there is no real proof of what did or did not occur between them. The court's sophistry is merely a pretext for the (in)justice system's primary goal of destroying any male who displeases a female. It is also outrageous to prosecute as rape alleged male misbehaviour or dishonesty regarding contraception without also prosecuting commonplace female misbehaviour (lies, fraud) regarding contraception. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/19 01:15 PM |
| 3 | In its guidelines on treating men, the American Psychological Association “is not merely blaming the victims...but also replacing therapy...with a political ideology,” says co-author of books on misandry.Nathanson and Young's four books about misandry are excellent. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/19 01:09 PM |
| 2 | Narcissist mother murdered her son aged 5 ‘in revenge’ - Of COURSE the kids dad was being denied access by courts(!!) The mother was “a narcissist who was only happy when she was the centre of attention”The type has been known for millennia - see Medea. | /r/MensRights | 04/07/19 07:49 PM |
| 1 | Understanding False Accusation StatisticsWe have no way of knowing how many "reports" to campus "authorities" or beat cops or "assault counselors" go no further. 4000 wouldn't surprise me. And perhaps Fairstein meant NYC in toto rather than Manhattan. Also, consider: http://archive.is/w2Lip (540+1128)(12/5) = 4003 As a separate matter, I think Fairstein's 50% ratio spot on. Btw, Radar misattributes the quote: http://www.mediaradar.org/alert20070507.php | /r/MensRights | 04/07/19 07:40 PM |
| 1 | Fact Checking "Fact Checking False Rape Accusations and Why We Shouldn't Fear a False Rape Epidemic."Excellent post. Additional information in support: Here, I discuss the details (and common mis-representation) of the FBI terminology and its 8% figure: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4w1z94/information_about_fbi_8_unfounded_accusation/ Another theory of the genesis of the 2% figure is a woozle fabricated by Susan Brownmiller, which she sourced to a judge of her acquaintance. | /r/MensRights | 04/07/19 07:30 PM |
| 1 | Understanding False Accusation StatisticsThere has never been 4000 annual UCR records of rape in all of NYC, let alone just Manhattan. Perhaps Fairstein is referring not to UCR (which are only those cases local police report to the FBI), but to the number of "reports" seen by any authorities in any way, from those which stay with campus police, to those reviewed by prosecutors and rejected, to those actually prosecuted. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/19 01:44 PM |
| 2 | Understanding False Accusation StatisticsWhen "scholars" from R.L. McNeely to Suzanne Steinmetz attempt honest study, they find their careers threatened or destroyed. There will never be scholarly sources free of the ideological commitment to politically-correct conclusions. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/19 01:42 PM |
| 1 | Understanding False Accusation StatisticsBesides, if rape is ridiculously underreported, which I find credible, at least for date rape and "milder cases" and especially for male victims, false accusations are still a fraction of the number of actual sexual assaults out there A few observations: Your conclusion "still a fraction" is unjustified without the actual numbers. Rate of under-reporting can perhaps be estimated by comparing (for example) the NCVS survey (direct survey) with Unified Crime Reporting (FBI compilation of reported c… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/19 01:39 PM |
| 4 | Understanding False Accusation StatisticsExcellent post. In support: Here, I discuss the details (and common mis-representation) of the FBI terminology and its 8% figure: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4w1z94/information_about_fbi_8_unfounded_accusation/ Another theory of the genesis of the 2% figure is a woozle fabricated by Susan Brownmiller, which she sourced to a judge of her acquaintance. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/19 01:19 PM |
| 1 | On Toxic Femininity - Quillette. Warning: repostThis is an excellent essay. Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/19 04:05 AM |
| 7 | We believe youIt's up to the accuser (or prosecutor on the accuser's behalf), not the accused, to provide "proof and evidence". You have cavalierly abrogated one of the core concepts of justice. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/19 01:08 PM |
| 1 | Newbie liberal female perspective: Why does men's rights have such a bad rep?Why Does MR Have Such a Bad Rep? Because it is independent enough to challenge the gynocentrism inherent in Western civilisation. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 06:04 AM |
| 1 | Newbie liberal female perspective: Why does men's rights have such a bad rep?This! It is the correct refutation of "men control society" and "most legislators are men". | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 06:01 AM |
| 2 | Newbie liberal female perspective: Why does men's rights have such a bad rep?And Jayed is far from jaded. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 06:00 AM |
| 3 | Newbie liberal female perspective: Why does men's rights have such a bad rep?So I've always envisioned this subreddit to be some sort of incel, fedora wearing version of Return of Kings or the worst of r/redpill.... We are MRAs, not necessarily TRPs nor incels. But incels and TRPs are nevertheless human beings. Incels are no more inherently blameworthy than their female analogue (roughly), a virgin with regrets. TRPs are no more inherently blameworthy than their female analogue, a woman who works at becoming hotter. Roosh and RoK are not necessarily typical TRP/PUA. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 05:55 AM |
| 2 | How Many Women Stormed the Normandy Beaches?Hehe. You've an excellent post - and the patience to dissect cant. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/19 12:28 AM |
| 0 | Stanford/Brock Turner "Victim" Cashes InSo? Both of you are pieces of SHIT who jumped to crucify Turner without seeking a single bit of accurate information. Now go learn something about the case before opening your coprophagous yap to spew ignorant, ad hom SHIT. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/19 12:07 AM |
| 1 | Stanford/Brock Turner "Victim" Cashes InExcellent comments. Thank you. And now she's cashing in. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/19 11:26 PM |
| 0 | Stanford/Brock Turner "Victim" Cashes InYou're not only a fool, you're a liar. Gather your few wits to do a combo search for my posts on this sub-reddit about Turner; you'll find lots of details and solid arguments supported by links to articles and court documents. Or is an advanced search beyond the capability of your grey cell? | /r/MensRights | 10/06/19 11:24 PM |
| 2 | Parkland Deputy Prosecuted. Would a Female Have Been Prosecuted?Congratulations. I agree with you. You understood my points (unlike a couple of mental midgets commenting). | /r/MensRights | 10/06/19 11:05 PM |
| 1 | Parkland Deputy Prosecuted. Would a Female Have Been Prosecuted?Well, well, there's a piece of shit like yourself in every crowd. You simply ignored all the defence points, didn't bother to read the links, didn't explore additional links, and were abusive to boot. The links I gave as well as others easily available (on that weird newfangled product called Google) contradict every one of your claims. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/06/09/scot-peterson-charged-parkland-shooting-experts-worry-about-criminalizing-cowardice/?utm_term=.5a7cb1fe1a01 Lawy… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/19 11:01 PM |
| 1 | Parkland Deputy Prosecuted. Would a Female Have Been Prosecuted?You failed to read the articles, the legal issues, and the gender issues. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/19 10:56 PM |
| 3 | Media Hype of Tom Chang Study: "Cold Rooms May Hurt Women’s Productivity"This is characteristic of feminism: Every female whine - whether justified or unjustified, truthful or fabricated - is highlighted, deemed oppression by the patriarchy, etc. Logic is discarded. Fairness to the male is discarded. Obvious unfairness to the male is overlooked. For example, one reason males might prefer cooler offices is that males are more often forced into very uncomfortable, multi-layer dress codes, such as the suit & suit jacket, long sleeves, closed neck (with tie), tec. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/19 01:32 PM |
| 1 | Vietnam (!) Thinks It Whorish of Female Celebrities to Sell Their BodiesExcellent point. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/19 01:29 PM |
| 4 | Brock Turner Again Case in the News Again. "Victim" to Write Memoir.Excellent video - thanks. This seems to be a follow-up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pqsg40wcCeU The Young Turks' Uygur and Kasparian are scum. In one interview, Cenk Uygur dealt infuriatingly, dishonestly and savagely with MRA Karen Straughan (/u/girlwriteswhat). He told Karen off, insisting Karen owed much to the women who got her the vote recently while men have always had the vote. He talked over Karen, not even polite or decent enough to let her respond. Of course, Karen knows 100 times … | /r/MensRights | 09/06/19 12:30 PM |
| 12 | Brock Turner Again Case in the News Again. "Victim" to Write Memoir.There was no intercourse. Emily Doe and Brock Turner met at a party. He was a student; she was older, a graduate. They both went to the party to drink and possibly to find a hookup. Turner made a pass at her sister, which the sister rejected. Turner then began dancing with Emily Doe. They were observed both getting consensually touchy in public while dancing. They left to go to his dormitory room, obviously for further activity. On the way, she called her boyfriend and left a garbled message. On… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/19 05:24 AM |
| 3 | Brock Turner False Accuser Cashes In & MR Board Censors Discussion of ItYou're right. | /r/MGTOW | 09/06/19 04:26 AM |
| 6 | Brock Turner False Accuser Cashes In & MR Board Censors Discussion of ItI don't know which MR mod removed the post. It might well have been a gelded male rather than a female. | /r/MGTOW | 09/06/19 02:53 AM |
| 4 | Stanford/Brock Turner "Victim" Cashes InYou are the reason innocent men cannot get justice. You're a gelded, evil piece of white-knighting shit. Now, go read the material I referenced before making a further fool of yourself. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/19 02:49 AM |
| 4 | Stanford/Brock Turner "Victim" Cashes InYou are the reason innocent men cannot get justice. You're a gelded, evil piece of white-knighting shit. Now, go read the material I referenced before making a further fool of yourself. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/19 02:49 AM |
| 2 | Stanford/Brock Turner "Victim" Cashes InYou're purely and simply evil, rushing to condemn a male with wrong information. They never had intercourse and he was not convicted of intercourse. Behind a dumpster is inaccurate. They were both so drunk that they stumbled, under a pine tree, on the way to his dorm room to fuck. The dumpster was nearby but they were still in public. (That's how they were seen by "the Swedes".) American Thinker has some good articles. In any case, the site doesn't matter; Solway's comments, and the Fiamengo mat… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/19 02:48 AM |
| 3 | Stanford/Brock Turner "Victim" Cashes InRead the many discussions here, or the articles and videos by Janice Fiamengo and her husband Solway. https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/06/a_double_injustice_throws_a_scare_into_the_nations_judges.html Oversimplified, a Stanford student, Turner, and ex-student, Doe, met at a party, got drunk and had foreplay; then she passed out. The media hype accused Turner of raping an unconscious woman, even though he never unzipped his pants. He was convicted of three counts with registration an… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/19 04:51 PM |
| 6 | A list of men's many responsibilities during the act of sexExcellent post. One of the many misandrist issues about sex: If the man is in the mood and the woman not, he's a sexist Neanderthal. If the woman is in the mood and the man not, he's a loser and a wimp. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/19 01:33 AM |
| 1 | fuck feminism and fuck society. We have to make sure they realize where they standCiting the NYT about men is as ludicrous as citing the Sturmer about antisemitism. Even when displaying superficial consideration for men, the ideas will be sloppy. For example, they fail to support their claim of 9 in 10. And, exactly how can one capture the rate of pregnancy from one-night stands? Women are notoriously reluctant to admit that. The method is also in error. Men have to say what the women want if the relationship is to continue. Pussywhipped literally. The fact remains that men h… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/19 10:16 AM |
| 1 | fuck feminism and fuck society. We have to make sure they realize where they standFeminsim is a contraction of "female supremacism". | /r/MensRights | 03/06/19 01:27 PM |
| 1 | fuck feminism and fuck society. We have to make sure they realize where they standSo it is not the woman's desire to keep a fetus which makes it a legal person. It is the state which decides. I suspect that varies with jurisdiction and circumstances - sometimes the woman's whim, sometimes the state's. (But never, of course, the father's decision, or even any say.) Edit: Your contrived hypothetical is irrelevant to reality. And your claims are hot air: after 24 weeks elective abortions are banned by every country I know of Actually, full-term abortions are a hot issue in the U… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/19 01:26 PM |
| 1 | fuck feminism and fuck society. We have to make sure they realize where they standAdditional issue supporting OP's post: The abortion issue has raised women's status to that of a god. If the woman does not want the foetus, it can be aborted; she and the doctor have committed no crime. If the woman wants the foetus, and a robber kills her, the criminal can (in some jurisdictions) be charged with two murders. That means the criterion for whether or not the foetus is a human being is the whim of the mother, to whom society now allows the decision as to when human life exists. | /r/MensRights | 02/06/19 02:06 AM |
| 1 | fuck feminism and fuck society. We have to make sure they realize where they standI agree. After all, for years (decades? centuries?) women have been telling us how horrible men are, that men are responsible for all of humanity's problems, that women bear no responsibility for any problems, etc. Millions of words have been written on the topic, and entire academic departments teach misandry. So, why in the world should any man ever resent that and ever return the hatred? And why should any man ever have the right to vent? We must prevent that. Men deserve no such right. A sin… | /r/MensRights | 02/06/19 01:58 AM |
| 4 | Divorced dads jailed for owing as little as $500 in support payments. The new debtors prison. Just insane.Ancient history is irrelevant. The modern era applied the tender years doctrine and still does. Fathers deserve a century of compensation. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/19 08:43 PM |
| 13 | Divorced dads jailed for owing as little as $500 in support payments. The new debtors prison. Just insane.Or maybe, for the next century, custody should go to the father to compensate men for more than a century of "tender years doctrine" automatically awarding custody to the female. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/19 07:18 PM |
| 5 | Weinstein to Pay $44M - For Female Greed or for Female Dignity?exact story plays out among damn near 100 accusers, there's an element of truth to it. Multiple accusations are probative only if completely independent, which these are not. That is, history is replete with cases of multiple accusers learning what to say from one another, the Salem witch trials being an obvious example. This is all the more true if there is sufficient money involved to give incentive to opportunists. $44m is just such incentive. Even if they were whores, they shouldn't be in a … | /r/MensRights | 25/05/19 10:11 AM |
| 4 | Weinstein to Pay $44M - For Female Greed or for Female Dignity?How are you so clueless about legal ethics? Every accused deserves a defence. Media reports are poor indicators of the details of legal cases and of gender issues. Why do you fall for media hype, without even asking questions? | /r/MensRights | 25/05/19 10:06 AM |
| 1 | Misandrist AOC, Liz Warren commiserate over 'Game of Thrones' ending: 'Ugh, this was written by men'Indeed: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Báthory https://www.amazon.co.uk/Hitlers-Furies-German-Killing-Fields/dp/0099572281 | /r/MensRights | 22/05/19 01:27 PM |
| 1 | Actress and liberal activist Alyssa Milano calls for women to go on a “sex strike” to protest new abortion laws - promoting the narrative that women have sex only as a "concession" or gift to men, not because they enjoy sex for its own sakeDoesn't she know - Lysistrata already tried a sex strike and it didn't work. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/19 11:13 AM |
| 1 | False Accusation Issues Hop Cultures: Jingyao Liu vs Richard LiuObviously China follows the US model. The suit is in Minnesota. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/19 04:41 AM |
| 2 | Thank MenYou have a more narrow view of what "hard/necessary work" means than I do. You have entirely missed or perverted Karen Straughan's original point. Straughan (and Paglia and Sommers) have not said "hard" or "necessary". They have said (if you understood the OP) that it is men who do the strenuous and dangerous physical labour to maintain the structure which keeps modern society from sinking back into the mud. Look out your window. Every building was constructed by males, every pavement was laid b… | /r/MensRights | 02/05/19 01:17 PM |
| 13 | The Hard truth about DivorceWomen used to be property for a man. False. He was responsible for her care. True. We have not empowered women, instead, women are now owned by the state. Many women are so empowered that they own a man (the ex). And not all women are owned by the state. Many are independent earners and still own a man. They [state or ex] are responsible for her care. True. The state will force a man to pay for her when possible to save on costs. True. Old school feminism was for equal rights. False. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/19 01:09 PM |
| 11 | The Hard truth about DivorceOnly females can get pregnant to qualify for income transfer from the state or from the male. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/19 01:06 PM |
| 1 | Thank MenIt's not sexist to point out that men and women are simply different It is indeed sexist when used as a pretext to justify harder work by men. That was Karen's point, and it remains correct. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/19 10:47 AM |
| 1 | Thank MenAnecdotal evidence is relevant as a counterexample against absolutist claims. More bullshit. Who said absolutist? Karen said 90%, not 100%. You tried to use anecdotal evidence to exaggerate women's contributions relative to men's. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/19 10:45 AM |
| 2 | Thank MenYour link doesn't support your claim. In 2017, women accounted for more than half of all workers within several industry sectors: financial activities (53 percent), education and health services (75 percent), leisure and hospitality (51 percent), and other services (52 percent). (Other services includes repair and maintenance industries; personal and laundry services; membership associations and organizations; and private households.) However, women were substantially underrepresented (relative … | /r/MensRights | 29/04/19 02:47 PM |
| 9 | Feminism went too far in Spain. Now Spanish politicians want to ban feminist groups. Feminists all over should pay heed for equality's sake.Spain's one-way gender law has destroyed more than one million male lives. The law needs to be reversed and the false accusers jailed. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/19 09:09 PM |
| 1 | Thank MenYou're bullshitting. Karen is correct. Women will generally do work with high reward to effort ratio and/or status to effort ratio and/or posing or easy verbal manipulation.That means writing, modeling, bitching, and law, and avoiding strenuous fields like engineering, STEM, construction, etc. Your praise for female colleagues is anecdotal and not a statistic, thus not an honest argument. Survey the totals of all "building" fields maintaining or advancing civilisation. Include all STEM, all cons… | /r/MensRights | 28/04/19 09:00 PM |
| 9 | An interesting video, which can hopefully help everyone find some common groundThere is no common ground. Identity politics and feminism, as expressed by the video, are an illness, a cancer. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/19 08:49 PM |
| 2 | Thank MenI don't believe in going back to women being subjugated and deemed inferior. Largely a myth. Treatment and living standard in earlier Western societies were determined by socioeconomic status, not gender. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/csai5i5/ | /r/MensRights | 27/04/19 10:48 PM |
| 1 | Thank MenDoesn't mean women are less than men, as both are important to society. I contest that. Too many women complain they're oppressed even while the males do the hard, physically damaging, dangerous work, dying 5 years earlier. Karen used the right word - narcissistic. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/19 10:45 PM |
| 1 | Thank MenBaloney. Karen is correct, referring to jobs which keep the physical infrastructure working. Over 96% of construction workers are male: https://www.theguardian.com/careers/careers-blog/2015/may/19/where-are-all-the-women-why-99-of-construction-site-workers-are-male https://www.foxnews.com/us/more-women-work-in-construction-thats-still-a-mans-world Other physically demanding and dangerous jobs, from paving to logging, are also nearly entirely male. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/19 10:39 PM |
| 1 | Thank MenWomen tend to like work which is clean, indoors, with no heavy lifting. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/19 10:32 PM |
| 1 | Thank MenAmen! Karen's great. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/19 10:29 PM |
| 1 | How many lies can you spot in this article?It's too bad the feminist left is not so efficient at running a modern society, as it is at smearing anyone (as Fiamengo) contradicting its agenda. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/19 12:44 PM |
| 2 | Natalie Portman explains how her veganism relates to women's issues: 'We're exploiting female bodies'Carnage mockumentary Interesting. Thanks. I wonder if ditzy vegan is more common among females and, if so, why. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/19 11:52 AM |
| 0 | Joe Biden compares supporters of due process to ‘Nazis’ who marched in CharlottesvilleSomehow, I doubt that. https://www.thecollegefix.com/bernie-sanders-signs-on-to-campus-sexual-assault-bill-day-after-clintons-high-profile-speech/ https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/03/sanders-apologizes-2016-campaign-harassment-1078250 https://medium.com/@katefustich/bernie-sanders-is-the-most-feminist-candidate-but-white-feminism-is-his-biggest-threat-62a67b8c319 The most critical fact that any woman must consider as the 2020 election approaches, is the fact that of any candidate, male or … | /r/MensRights | 27/04/19 11:12 AM |
| 4 | Joe Biden compares supporters of due process to ‘Nazis’ who marched in CharlottesvilleMaybe, but the question is - which candidate is least of a threat to substantive due process for males? | /r/MensRights | 26/04/19 10:26 AM |
| 6 | Joe Biden compares supporters of due process to ‘Nazis’ who marched in CharlottesvilleBiden just kissed Anita Hill's arse. I hope that gives him a terminal STD. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/19 11:38 PM |
| 4 | Canidate Biden Already Kneeling to Anita HillIt is the defamed male, Clarence Thomas, who deserves the apology. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/19 09:28 PM |
| 20 | Debunking some myths about men's issuesIn support of OP points in Myth #3: Forty years ago, the late Suzanne Steinmetz initiated research about husband battering with her seminal article in Victimology: http://www.papa-help.ch/downloads/Steinmetz_The_Battered_Husband_Syndrome.pdf Shortly thereafter, Murray Straus joined with Suzanne Steinmetz and Richard Gelles to publish the famous book including their estimate of slightly more DV against men than against women: https://www.amazon.com/Behind-Closed-Doors-Violence-American/dp/1412805… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/19 01:53 PM |
| 13 | Marketing experts labeled Gillette's sexist against men ad as the worst marketing move of the year, and they predict it will trash Gillette's salesI love that we're also not supposed to ever approach women we find attractive. Indeed. One way feminism oppresses men is its fairly deliberate erasure of the fact that solid relationships (including marriage) usually require two initiatives: the social initiative to express interest ("Would you like to have a drink sometime?"), still mostly the task of the male. the sexual initiative to make the first touch, still almost exclusively the task of the male. If men did not make these two initiatives… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/19 09:24 AM |
| 2 | Marketing experts labeled Gillette's sexist against men ad as the worst marketing move of the year, and they predict it will trash Gillette's salesThe problem is indeed coming from P&G management, from CEO David Taylor to other upper management: https://www.boston.com/news/business/2019/01/14/gillette-ad-men-me-too Gary Coombe, the president of Proctor and Gamble’s grooming business, said in a statement that the company hopes to help “deliver positive change that will matter for years to come.” P&G is also contributing millions to SJW's: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/agj2h6/gillette_main_page_lightbox_supports_misandrist/ P&… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/19 09:13 AM |
| 6 | My Boyfriend is being wrongly accused of sexual assault.And if what you’re saying is true then it’s all because a prick and her friends couldn’t handle rejection. The story of Potiphar's wife shows this situation ( false accusation in revenge for rejection) has been well-known for millennia. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/19 11:09 PM |
| 9 | My Boyfriend is being wrongly accused of sexual assault.Exactly correct. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/19 11:06 PM |
| 7 | My Boyfriend is being wrongly accused of sexual assault.Andrew Miltenberg, Kimberly Lau, and F.I.R.E. have helped falsely-accused university students as legal counsel. Please contact them. If they themselves cannot help, perhaps they can suggest other legal representation. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/19 11:04 PM |
| 2 | Doubly Unethical Behavior by Some Manospherianshttps://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/39z669/womens_recognition_award/ | /r/MensRights | 23/04/19 08:50 PM |
| 1 | Doubly Unethical Behavior by Some ManospheriansYes! Hurrah, Karen! | /r/MensRights | 23/04/19 08:25 PM |
| 2 | Doubly Unethical Behavior by Some ManospheriansExactly! | /r/MensRights | 23/04/19 08:15 PM |
| 1 | Doubly Unethical Behavior by Some ManospheriansAlso, perhaps, the mythopoetics. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/19 08:13 PM |
| 1 | Doubly Unethical Behavior by Some ManospheriansIt's a structure with a membrane (or membrain), nucleus, DNA, cytoplasm, etc. :-} | /r/MensRights | 23/04/19 08:11 PM |
| 1 | Doubly Unethical Behavior by Some ManospheriansWhy is a male in the manosphere responsible for what another male says? Obama is not responsible for OJ. Hillary isn't responsible for Wuornos. Other PUAs are not responsible for Roosh. Etc. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/19 08:08 PM |
| 1 | About the black hole image and the politics around it.Thanks - I hadn't looked closely at Böhm. Did Backus (of BNF) at IBM, or Hopper at Rand, get the idea from Böhm, or had it become industry knowledge? Backus certainly completed the Fortran compiler before Hopper completed COBOL. Her admiralty designation supports my statement that female contributions were recognised. (Three of the five Nobels given to Curies and Joliot were to women.) The myth-making, from DNA to black holes, may be an unnecessary attempt to assert women would have equaled men … | /r/MensRights | 13/04/19 03:50 PM |
| 1 | About the black hole image and the politics around it.Proof? She's been wrongly credited with first compiler and first use of "bug", so she puts the myth machine in high gear. Her Flow-Matic seems to have been developed in parallel with IBM's Fortran but was completed later, with obviously less use. Did she create the compiler concept, or did IBM, or did the industry generally? Her emphasis on English-like instructions did result in COBOL, which had a nice, prominent run. But for females, feminism and media want to overstate accomplishments, unders… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/19 03:08 PM |
| 2 | About the black hole image and the politics around it.Thanks to OP for an accurate analysis! | /r/MensRights | 13/04/19 09:51 AM |
| 2 | About the black hole image and the politics around it.I can name at least one female invention/discovery in every branch of science. The origin of mitochondria, the concept of compilators Myth. Hopper may have written the first linkage-editor (with misnomer compiler) but not the first compiler. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/19 09:47 AM |
| 3 | About the black hole image and the politics around it.I get your point. But no need to be concerned. Anyone, even women, opposing radical feminism will be accused of misogyny. In which case, the truth is the best defence. That is, we should just stick to the truth and not worry much about the reaction. Also, the 900k code claim seems just sloppiness quickly-corrected, while the claim of MRAs objecting "violently" to women in movies is pure malice. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/19 09:31 AM |
| 1 | #MeToo Comes to the World of Dancehttps://www.lohud.com/story/news/local/westchester/2018/09/19/nyc-ballet-sex-scandal-lawsuit-new-details/1349505002/ Waterbury said the entire episode has left her with "serious and severe psychological and emotional distress, mental anguish, embarrassment and humiliation," which she said "are of a permanent and lasting nature, that said plaintiff was confined to her bed, home and/or various medical institutions." An ex-boyfriend sending pictures to two other guys (so not distributed on the net)… | /r/MensRights | 10/04/19 12:04 AM |
| 1 | Toxic feminism hurts women tooYes, when that vote was unaccompanied by the same civic obligations as men - military, mines, jobs, alimony, death on the job, etc. gave women the unreasonable power to take full control of the system, to make gynocentrism a central principle of government. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/19 04:47 PM |
| 1 | #MeToo Comes to the World of DanceHave you internalised feminism? You seem to conclude everything in a feminist lawsuit the truth, without even bothering to ask for corroboration or for the defence response! You parrot/repeat the lawsuit, without even considering its internal contradictions. (For example, it, states, "The sharing of naked and explicit images of female ballet dancers, including Ms. Waterbury amongst male Ballet dancers is a problem that appears to have occurred exclusively at NYCB." So, if it occurred exclusively… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/19 02:26 PM |
| 1 | #MeToo Comes to the World of DanceThis isn't #metoo. Yes, it is. The lawsuit clearly alleges sexual misbehaviour: https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=3V369DaazrQWCe9oVYjdRw== This is about women's autonomy in dance. That's quite possibly a component. But, if Waterbury or her feminist cohort try to piggy-back issues of artistic independence upon the #MeToo allegations: They'll win the #MeToo issue, as modern feminist society wants all sexual power to remain clearly in female hands. They'll lose the artis… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/19 08:41 AM |
| 7 | #MeToo Comes to the World of DanceIn one of Waterbury's most common photos (for advertiser Cartier?), she uses her breasts to draw attention: https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1729/0211/files/503BE03C00000578-0-image-m-81_1537061776046.jpg?v=1537740438 Male dancers exchanging photos of female dancers is unwise and illegal in this day and age. But: Does it really merit societal upheaval? Does it really indicate a "culture of exploitation" as feminists claim? Nature seems to have built admiration for the female body into most (str… | /r/MensRights | 07/04/19 11:52 AM |
| 2 | Proposed subreddit rules for researchers.Sounds eminently reasonable. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/19 09:20 PM |
| 4 | On the double-standards men face while dating/u/PeterCornswalled seems to mean: Overly promiscuous women need to seek big-penis-men to get turned on, as a substitute for the turn-on a loyal wife could get from a loved husband. An overly promiscuous woman demanding a big-penis-man must already be so wide and loose in the vagina, that she's like the wide-open spaces of Montana, trying to assume for herself the role of the extremely-promiscuous Catherine the Great, reputed to have died under a (very happy?) horse. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/19 09:12 AM |
| 0 | International Conference on Men's Issues 2019So, you turn traitor upon a group of MRAs putting in tremendous work to organise a conference, merely because they may not (or may) give enough emphasis to your issue? You're an ass. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 09:18 PM |
| 1 | International Conference on Men's Issues 2019Why? The diehard conservatives, though not perfect, have been far more helpful to MR than the diehard liberals. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 09:07 PM |
| 1 | International Conference on Men's Issues 2019Don't be foolish: A Men's Conference is an accomplishment regardless of the details, which can always be improved year-to-year. To date, tradcons have been far more helpful in the fight against feminism, than any other identifiable group excepting MR itself. I do hope the tradcons understand MR wants and needs to include both right and left (without subordinating MR to either). Elsewhere in this thread, I've lamented MR being subordinated to extraneous ideology by Esmay, Elam, and Farrell in a M… | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 09:03 PM |
| 1 | International Conference on Men's Issues 2019Frankly, it's you who sounds like the nut job. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 09:01 PM |
| 1 | Why strict liability will ruin your life without a second thought.In fact, the fact that you’re so angry about this makes me think you don’t have very much sexual experience. Don't be a complete ass. I've played the dating game in a number of cultures, in a number of countries and languages, on a number of continents. So take your irrelevant, ad-hominem insults and shove them. What I'm angry about - as Ansari and Ghomeshi and Nungesser and many men should be angry about - is feminist society's (and soon law's) requirement that men prove themselves innocent of … | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 05:37 PM |
| 1 | "Women are sharing their experiences of receiving unsolicited advances from men"If men stop making "unsolicited advances", humanity will disappear. In the immortal words of Princess Ida: https://gsarchive.net/princess_ida/pi_lib.pdf PRIN. You ridicule it now; But if I carried out this glorious scheme [of female separatism], At my exalted name Posterity Would bow in gratitude! HILD. But pray reflect – If you enlist all women in your cause, And make them all abjure tyrannic Man, The obvious question then arises, ‘How Is this Posterity to be provided?’ PRIN. I never thought of… | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 05:11 PM |
| 1 | International Conference on Men's Issues 2019https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/05/mens-rights-movement-donald-trump-presidency/ In the MoJo article, Elam behaved exactly like a leftist: He gave ammunition to a progressive publication. He helped MoJo push the feminist Hillary. He attacked Trump's wall - certainly a leftist position. He betrayed MR by participating in an article whose intent was to help the feminist candidate (Hillary) defeat the non-feminist candidate (Trump). Stupid is as stupid does. And, in Elam's case, liberal i… | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 03:37 PM |
| 1 | International Conference on Men's Issues 2019Why, it's almost like men's rights is not a left-right issue or something This!!!!!!! Bravo, Karen. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 03:28 PM |
| 1 | International Conference on Men's Issues 2019Right on cue, this fellow proves the point I was making to /u/GirlWritesWhat; /u/gas_the_tradcons drags in extraneous ideologies (left/right/tradcon/alt-right) to unjustifiably attack Karen. MR will not succeed until both its leaders and its rank-and-file place MR ahead of other ideologies. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 03:28 PM |
| 1 | International Conference on Men's Issues 2019It's quite surreal that under the same post, I'm being taken to task because the MRM is both too far left and too far right. So basically, what you're saying is, because all three had doubts about Trump before he was elected, they're serving the hard left? No, Karen, that's not quite what I'm saying (and certainly not criticising you personally). I'm saying extraneous ideologies - such as liberalism/conservativism - have held MR back. For decades, MR has been too fractious and fissiparous, too i… | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 03:18 PM |
| 2 | People constantly overstate the extent to which women were "oppressed" in the past.Certainly. But time has passed, so the links may need checking for current validity. Karen Straughan (/u/girlwriteswhat) has also mentioned husbands being jailed for wives' debts and so may have more links. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/19 04:56 PM |
| 1 | The Economist Cover: "Why Female Economists Are Fed Up"Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/19 12:09 AM |
| 6 | Fantasy author EdMcdonald gets cleared of sexual harassment/harassment charges. Accuser used an extremely elaborate online presence to make it look like there were many women accusing him throughout many years.Even if we write with a pencil? :) | /r/MensRights | 28/03/19 11:33 PM |
| 1 | International Conference on Men's Issues 2019Here, all 3 serve the agenda of the hard-left MoJo: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/05/mens-rights-movement-donald-trump-presidency/ Worse, they leave the impression of intention to vote for the feminist, Hillary. In any case, my point remains: Too many in MR seem to place personal agendas/ideology ahead of the solidarity necessary to make MR a force to counter the well-organised and well-funded feminist machine. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/19 10:14 AM |
| 0 | International Conference on Men's Issues 2019Would MR's dyed-in-the-wool leftists (such as Esmay, Elam, Farrell, ....) ever admit the left a problem? | /r/MensRights | 27/03/19 02:52 AM |
| 1 | People constantly overstate the extent to which women were "oppressed" in the past.Most of /u/TheOceanBoy's post consists of information either tendentious or outrightly false. It's been debunked by a number of authors, such as Joanne Bailey and Martin van Creveld: Refutation of "Women's Historical Oppression" Also, see this citation of the ever-alert Karen Straughan (/u/GirlWritesWhat), disputing the "women as property" myth: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2dwgy7/were_women_property/ | /r/MensRights | 27/03/19 02:23 AM |
| 1 | "Carlsbad woman wins child support for 52-year-old daughter"Courts have supported racial segregation return of runaway slaves to masters the construction of Auschwitz among many other crimes against humanity. Accepting corrupt courts in those cases, and in the case of alimony and child support, is to justify barbarism - exactly what you're doing. Oppressive court decisions must be resisted. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/19 12:56 PM |
| 1 | Alan Dershowitz to FBI: Investigate Me & My False Accusers CriminallyDershowitz has the professional capabilities needed to defend himself yet will still have to expend considerable effort, and it is unlikely the false accuser(s) will be prosecuted - at most, the accusations withdrawn. This is our dilemma - how to convince society and the legal profession that false accusers must be prosecuted. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/19 12:52 PM |
| 5 | "Carlsbad woman wins child support for 52-year-old daughter"Courts have ordered executions of innocents. And the German murder camps were legal. So the letter of the law has nought to do with justice - and especially where divorce and gender relations are concerned. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/19 07:47 PM |
| 2 | People constantly overstate the extent to which women were "oppressed" in the past.The idea of women marrying the rapist arose from the earlier idea of a woman having a right to "sell" her virginity to a male in return for lifetime support. The rapist deprives her of that right and so is made to support her for life. That was the "logic" whether or not we agree with it in modern times. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/19 07:40 PM |
| 1 | People constantly overstate the extent to which women were "oppressed" in the past.Maybe not even that. The idea of universal suffrage did not become common until Jackson in the USA and until the 1848 revolutions in Europe. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/19 07:36 PM |
| 9 | People constantly overstate the extent to which women were "oppressed" in the past.For more grist to your mill (and OP's), please see the references here: Refutation of "Women's Historical Oppression" as well as the below-the-line citation of Lucrezia Marinella. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/19 07:34 PM |
| 5 | People constantly overstate the extent to which women were "oppressed" in the past.OP, linked here is more information supporting your post: Refutation of "Women's Historical Oppression" Note in particular the Joanne Bailey monograph on coverture and a commentator's citation of Lucrezia Marinella. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/19 07:29 PM |
| 1 | "Why Is it "Weird" When a Woman Wants Sex More Than a Man?"Those two combined pretty clearly indicates that she wants stability. Stability = money ? Those who express this are greedy, mercenary bastards. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/19 05:26 PM |
| 5 | "Carlsbad woman wins child support for 52-year-old daughter"I disagree. "Child support" is usually disguised alimony, and both child support and alimony are crimes against humanity whose principal purpose is to continue male economic slavery even after the marriage (or relationship) has ended. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/19 05:22 PM |
| 1 | "Why Is it "Weird" When a Woman Wants Sex More Than a Man?"Come now, she is quite clearly mercenary. Men and some women don't usually give such high priority to finances that it slips out immediately in a discussion purportedly about love and sex. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/19 08:35 AM |
| 1 | How feminists use the "Motte and Bailey" rhetorical tactic in arguments | It's good to be prepared for this if ever you have to debase a feminist.This is a worthwhile and necessary discussion. Just a few points to add: Jordan Peterson likely knows the principles of rhetoric quite well. Both approaches - "rhetorical" and "straightforward" - help. Nevertheless, our strategy needs to consider the possibility that nature has built gynocentrism into the human animal, both female and male. Our logic (of any type) bumps into the wall of deep-seated, gynocentric human emotion. Women favour women, and men favour women. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/19 08:23 AM |
| 2 | How feminists use the "Motte and Bailey" rhetorical tactic in arguments | It's good to be prepared for this if ever you have to debase a feminist.I think you misunderstood, I mean the "feminist" side of the equation in the post. It looks like either a trumped up version of a (possibly) logical argument, or it's completely fabricated. I've never heard anyone say anything like OP's "feminists" say, except as written on the internet. And I attended a VERY liberal college in the US. Don't believe everything you read on social media, attention whores will say anything for the almighty click. True feminists don't believe crap like that, any mor… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/19 08:13 AM |
| 5 | "Trump's decision to change domestic violence and sexual assault definitions 'roll women's rights back 50 years'". Can anybody give me the lowdown as to what is going on here ?Thanks for the excellent summary. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/19 07:57 AM |
| 3 | "Trump's decision to change domestic violence and sexual assault definitions 'roll women's rights back 50 years'". Can anybody give me the lowdown as to what is going on here ?Notice the article's grotesque misrepresentation, describing affected accusers as "millions of domestic violence and sexual assault victims". | /r/MensRights | 13/03/19 07:56 AM |
| 3 | x "Journalists Fall for 'Completely Fake' Stats About Sexism in Tech"Disreputable source but warrants further inquiry. Perhaps a good example of feminism inverting reality. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/19 11:16 AM |
| 3 | Intergenerational equity; "because women didn't have the vote for x years, men today should be punished". Straw man, fair, or bonkers?Excellent post, OP! We should also understand that many of the feminist claims of historical oppression are either tendentious or out-rightly false: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4lkpr7/errors_concerning_universal_suffrage/ | /r/MensRights | 19/02/19 06:17 AM |
| 3 | Intergenerational equity; "because women didn't have the vote for x years, men today should be punished". Straw man, fair, or bonkers?Another form of argument is reductio ad absurdum or inconsistency: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ar3790/i_think_we_need_to_acknowledge_that_toxic/egno5dx/ For example, arguendo, accept the opponent's claim that women should be compensated for x years without the vote. Then point out that, for consistency: Women should be required to fight the country's wars for the next y thousand years. The tender years doctrine has existed for ~200 years, so sole paternal custody should be the d… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/19 06:12 AM |
| 1 | Misandrist Extremist Bindel Praises Feminist Murphy's Lawsuit against TwitterBindel is indeed a turd but the lesser part of the story - the lawsuit against Twitter is a potentially serious development. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/19 02:12 PM |
| 17 | "Why Is it "Weird" When a Woman Wants Sex More Than a Man?"If this is her site, she seems quite in love with herself: http://www.iamjuliareiss.com/about-2 A self-absorbed woman to whom men are the sum of their 401(k) retirement accounts - what man could possibly resist? /s | /r/MensRights | 17/02/19 12:57 PM |
| 1 | I think we need to acknowledge that "toxic masculinity" is just a misandrist dog whistle.When toxic femininity is thrown around it tends to be more of a tool of consistency rather than a form hate. I agree with you - that's exactly my argument, here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ar3790/i_think_we_need_to_acknowledge_that_toxic/egno5dx/ | /r/MensRights | 17/02/19 12:01 PM |
| 2 | I think we need to acknowledge that "toxic masculinity" is just a misandrist dog whistle.Inverting an opponent's arguments, to show hypocrisy or inconsistency or absurdity, is an extremely powerful weapon and should not be abandoned. It is analogous to the maths technique of using reductio ad absurdum or indirect proof - showing inconsistency - to show the truth or falshood of a proposition. For example, in social issues: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/akbz67/the_gender_privilege_myth/ef49hpf/ Moreover, one need not assert the inversion true; one can assert the inversi… | /r/MensRights | 17/02/19 11:57 AM |
| 16 | 'Spare innocent men anguish': India ruling aims to end false rape claims - Judges have moved to ensure that women driven by revenge and self-interest will no longer be able to make spurious allegations when relationships endDelhi Commission of Women: "53% of Claims False": https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-53-rape-cases-filed-between-april-2013-and-july-2013-false-delhi-commission-of-women-2023334 https://www.indiatoday.in/India/north/story/false-rape-cases-in-delhi-delhi-commission-of-women-233222-2014-12-29 | /r/MensRights | 12/02/19 11:19 AM |
| 6 | My 10yo Niece, dropping Red Pills in her Suffragette history homework..... through a child's eyes. Wonderful kid! | /r/MensRights | 10/02/19 09:04 PM |
| 5 | My 10yo Niece, dropping Red Pills in her Suffragette history homework.The corrections look very much like a 10 year old. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/19 09:03 PM |
| 1 | So has anyone seen these women’s only parking spots? Some parking garages have these in front of the handicapped spots, you know, the ones for people with disabilities who actually do need special treatment...Mall parking is as much public accommodation as mall stores. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/19 08:53 PM |
| 1 | So has anyone seen these women’s only parking spots? Some parking garages have these in front of the handicapped spots, you know, the ones for people with disabilities who actually do need special treatment...Such discrimination in public accommodation is illegal in most jurisdictions. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/19 08:51 PM |
| 3 | The author is too afraid to publish under their nameDo you mean Poe's Law? | /r/MensRights | 10/02/19 08:47 PM |
| 2 | Young woman acknowledges that sex is less pleasant for MGM victims, but still supports the practice since "it looks better"has it ever been except for religious? Ancient concepts of hygiene (whether correct or incorrect) were likely at the origin of the practice but haven't held true for centuries. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/19 07:40 PM |
| 6 | Young woman acknowledges that sex is less pleasant for MGM victims, but still supports the practice since "it looks better"That's grotesque. At times, a partially plausible, medical pretext is given for circumcision. However, convenience for women is certainly not in any way a plausible pretext. Is men's convenience or whim an acceptable pretext for FGM? | /r/MensRights | 10/02/19 07:37 PM |
| 4 | Feminists hate men up to the point they realize they might be obsoleteMost bigoted and authoritarian philosophies aren't monolithic yet remain bigoted and authoritarian nonetheless. Cf. Maoism, Stalinism, apartheid, the KKK, NSDAP, etc. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/19 07:10 PM |
| 1 | Intactivism Needs a Better Ref than BollingerCorrect. Formal reporting doesn't exist. When I argue it should be a step in intactivist strategy - a botch registry - intactivists yawn. I guess they want to lose. But the article is relevant; in the absence of formal reporting, estimates are useful, but only if defensible, which Bollinger is not. Intactivists (including here) often cite Bollinger and claims of hundreds of neonatal deaths. Doing so actually harms intactivists' cause; it's as much bunk as the infamous 1 in 5 rape figure. Example… | /r/MensRights | 07/02/19 09:47 AM |
| -10 | got downvoted for thinking that MGM is just as abhorrent as FGMSorry, MGM is less extensive [surgery] than FGM. OP's title loses us credibility with the general public. You may think it abhorrent, but 99% of the earth's one billion circumcised men do not. In fact, they don't think about it much at all. Why not just say circumcision represents an unnecessary risk? That's absolutely true and absolutely defensible. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/19 01:58 AM |
| 1 | got downvoted for thinking that MGM is just as abhorrent as FGMHundreds of baby boys die from the "procedure" every year. Dubious. In the third world, circumcision occurs unhygienically at older ages. In the first world, the studies claiming hundreds of deaths attributed to circumcision any excess of male over female neonatal deaths. A better methodology is needed. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/19 01:56 AM |
| 0 | A subreddit devoted to recognizing and correcting toxic femininityI agree with /u/goodmod, /u/stakesishigh012 and /u/iSUREdoLIKEpeas that it's now necessary to "fight fire with fire". A "toxic femininity" subreddit is worthwhile (especially after the P&G-Gillette advert). We'll see how it does. However, many coming to /r/MensRights may not be aware of the toxic femininity subreddit. For that reason and more, any rule should not be too rigid, splintering our energy. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/19 01:27 AM |
| 4 | There's a growing movement on FetLife to boycott events with gender based prices. I think this is a really good sign of progress.Theoretically, most jurisdictions bar pricing discrimination by gender in events and "accommodation" and have administrative enforcement which would accept a complaint. However, two issues might arise: A group might claim the event private. The complainant might find "the exposure" embarrassing. But then, so would the group. | /r/MensRights | 27/01/19 10:12 PM |
| 13 | The gender privilege mythIn mathematics, an argument may be direct or indirect. The indirect argument is proof by showing inconsistency. It's very useful in the social realm. For example: Why is a 16-year-old female considered by the feminist left to be capable of making the life-and-death abortion decision without the consent of her parents, but not capable of deciding to get laid in the first place? Why, in some jurisdictions, is a 16-year-old, expectant female considered to be capable of getting her own apartment on … | /r/MensRights | 27/01/19 06:59 PM |
| 18 | This is sad because it’s meant to be a satirical article but it gives a better picture of modern masculinity than most media companies nowadaysSome "translation" is in order. Women say they want men to express their feelings - but then are contemptuous of men who do. Women say they want a sensitive man. This means a man who senses what a woman wants and provides it to her without complaining. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/19 11:24 PM |
| 1 | P&G Chief Branding Officer discusses 'We Believe' Campaign To Curb Toxic MasculinityIn a way. He's raping the reputation of Western men. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/19 12:30 AM |
| 1 | P&G Chief Branding Officer discusses 'We Believe' Campaign To Curb Toxic MasculinityYou can fick Pritchard and P&G by boycotting all P&G brands: https://us.pg.com/brands/ | /r/MensRights | 17/01/19 12:29 AM |
| 0 | So, Why Are Men Angry At A Gillette Advert? (Men Are Human wades in)Feminists used to burn their bras. Should MRAs stage a public burning of P&G/Gillette products? | /r/MensRights | 17/01/19 12:21 AM |
| 6 | So, Why Are Men Angry At A Gillette Advert? (Men Are Human wades in)Wrong. They've explicitly stated they've a social agenda, including millions to SJW causes. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/19 12:11 AM |
| 2 | The Gillette commercial is a calculated strategy that highlights female privilegeOP, it is true that men do most of the earning, and women do most of the retail spending. However, the names of the "research" links you cite indicate an agenda and should make us wary of their "statistics", which need close review and are likely distorted. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/19 12:50 PM |
| 0 | Proctor and Gamble releases anti men commercial. Here's all their products to boycottGillette has a light box covering its entire main page, backing up the advert. Much worse is that it has stated its intent to give $3m (much of it earned from male consumers) to SJW groups. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/19 07:52 AM |
| 12 | Forbes: "Why Gillette's New Ad Campaign Is Toxic"The page states the article's author is a Prof of Marketing, certainly a credential equal to or better than a run-of-the-mill Forbes or Economist or even WSJ journalist. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/19 10:48 PM |
| 3 | Proctor and Gamble releases anti men commercial. Here's all their products to boycottThe misandrist hate-monger is one Kim Gehrig: https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-46874617 | /r/MensRights | 15/01/19 12:12 PM |
| 6 | New "The Best Men Can Be" Gillette campaign gushes with hatred and contempt for men and boys. After 15 years as an MRA, it is the worst thing I have personally ever seen. I am without words.NOT ALL WOMEN are terrible people. Then why do men have such an uphill fight asking for their human rights? | /r/MensRights | 15/01/19 05:10 AM |
| 1 | New "The Best Men Can Be" Gillette campaign gushes with hatred and contempt for men and boys. After 15 years as an MRA, it is the worst thing I have personally ever seen. I am without words.My sympathies for you on the occasion of your gelding. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/19 05:07 AM |
| 7 | New "The Best Men Can Be" Gillette campaign gushes with hatred and contempt for men and boys. After 15 years as an MRA, it is the worst thing I have personally ever seen. I am without words.P&G brands to boycott: https://us.pg.com/brands/ | /r/MensRights | 15/01/19 05:00 AM |
| 17 | Let’s Make Gillette’s new ad the most disliked video on YouTubeP&G brands to boycott: https://us.pg.com/brands/ | /r/MensRights | 15/01/19 04:59 AM |
| 10 | Proctor and Gamble releases anti men commercial. Here's all their products to boycottP&G brands to boycott: https://us.pg.com/brands/ | /r/MensRights | 15/01/19 04:55 AM |
| 3 | WSJ: Gillette Lectures Men about "Toxic Masculinity"Will they make an advert to encourage better female behaviour? I doubt it. No self-respecting male should ever buy from Proctor & Gamble / Gillette again.. https://www.boston.com/news/business/2019/01/14/gillette-ad-men-me-too Gary Coombe, the president of Proctor and Gamble’s grooming business, said in a statement that the company hopes to help “deliver positive change that will matter for years to come.” P&G brands: https://us.pg.com/brands/ | /r/MensRights | 15/01/19 04:40 AM |
| 1 | 'Traditional masculinity' deemed harmful, could lead to sexual harassment, medical group saysYour interpretation and mine differ. Many use "toxic masculinity" to designate bad or degenerate male behaviour, perhaps arising from the male character, harmful to women and to society. My mirror-image term "toxic femininity" thus designates bad or degenerate female behaviour, perhaps arising from the female character, harmful to men and to society. This would include false accusations, parasitism, hypergamy, abuse of the public teat, etc. Many feminists do often criticize traditional femininit… | /r/MensRights | 12/01/19 09:09 PM |
| 1 | 'Traditional masculinity' deemed harmful, could lead to sexual harassment, medical group saysWill the same group criticise traditional/toxic femininity? | /r/MensRights | 10/01/19 02:51 AM |
| 2 | 'Traditional masculinity' deemed harmful, could lead to sexual harassment, medical group saysthe writers of LAO SVU very so much hate men. FTFY. Law & Order also lies blatantly about many "facts" - such as recidivism rates - to advance carceral feminism. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/19 02:46 AM |
| 5 | Actions vs words- looking at what feminists actually DO, they are trying to creating a blatantly segregated and unequal society where men are second class citizens.Excellent post, OP. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/19 12:46 PM |
| 3 | US Centre-Right Admits Existence of HypergamyOne-half of the political spectrum acknowledging due process and "innocent until proved guilty" in cases such as Kavanaugh was not a good thing? Similarly, one-half of the political spectrum openly acknowledging hypergamy and female greed is a good thing. You'd rather the whole political spectrum cover it up? | /r/MensRights | 05/01/19 06:00 PM |
| 3 | US Centre-Right Admits Existence of Hypergamymen who wish to be selected for marriage need to be able to protect and provide for a family That's not what the citation says. You state that males need to earn in order to be selected for marriage. The citation says males need to earn more than females to be selected for marriage. Let's use numbers. You imply that a male earning 75k USD annually would be more likely to be selected than a male earning 10k USD. The citation implies that a male earning 75k USD annually would be unlikely to be sel… | /r/MensRights | 05/01/19 05:57 PM |
| 34 | The usual hypocrisy from buzzfeedBullshit. Your sources are far from neutral. Do you really expect objective analysis from the "Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film"? Not a single number in the lot indicating the willingness of men vs women to be flexible in roles Not a single number in the lot measuring initiative - that is, male vs female to create startups, etc. Examples: Tom Cruise and Mel Gibson were shunned because of behaviour - and proceeded to relaunch themselves. Famke Janssen insists at 50+ upon wanti… | /r/MensRights | 05/01/19 08:22 AM |
| 0 | x Feminist Amy Siskind Tries to Get a Professor Fired for Disagreeing with HerThen you're worse than insane - you're complicit in the subjugation of men and much worse. The Guardian has published articles pushing the idea of putting men in concentration camps. The New York Times, meanwhile, has an editorial board member who tweets about "how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men", "#CancelWhitePeople", hopes "White people ... all go extinct soon", etc. The Grauniad and NYT are much worse than Breitbart. They're hate rags dressed up as journalism. | /r/MensRights | 05/01/19 06:02 AM |
| 4 | Why strict liability will ruin your life without a second thought.You're confusing expediency with morality. At the moment, in practice, it maybe true that Getting explicit consent is needed to fully protect yourself. However, the idea of the law creating such a state of affairs is insane. Do you really intend to put the responsibility on men for proving themselves innocent? You can also get explicit consent in different ways other than flat out asking. What utter bullshit. Jian Ghomeshi and Aziz Ansari had clear proof of consent, yet their lives were still ru… | /r/MensRights | 05/01/19 05:55 AM |
| 3 | Why strict liability will ruin your life without a second thought.This is the equivalent of saying if a woman got wet, it wasn’t rape True. Both male and female bodies have physiological reactions which have nothing to do with consent. We’ve well established that consent that affirmative consent is needed to determine whether or not it’s rape. False in several ways: Some jurisdictions - but as yet far from all - have unfortunately introduced the ludicrous idea of affirmative consent. Women are actually turned off by a man asking explicitly - especially if aske… | /r/MensRights | 04/01/19 09:31 PM |
| 12 | Why strict liability will ruin your life without a second thought.Strict liability may also be applied in a contradictory manner. Brock Turner engaged in consensual foreplay with an older female when both were drunk. She then passed out. He continued frottage, clothed, while he may have been too drunk to realise her passed out. He was charged with, and convicted, of a count of sex with a drunken person and a count of sex with an unconscious person. Strict liability applied; his intent and state of mind were irrelevant. Bu he was also convicted of a third count… | /r/MensRights | 04/01/19 10:23 AM |
| 0 | Incels are a Symptom of a Bigger Problem With Male DepressionIn other words, you're claiming men should never bother to try to make changes to society, because it won't work. The successful history of feminism in changing society would then make women far more courageous and effective than men - or, at least, than you. | /r/MensRights | 04/01/19 10:09 AM |
| 10 | Incels are a Symptom of a Bigger Problem With Male DepressionIncels, at large, know what they want, but they aren't willing to work for it. I disagree. No matter how hard anyone works, not everyone can be in the top 20%; it's statistically impossible. In principle, there are approximately equal numbers of men and women. There should be a female for every male and a male for every female. But female hypergamy (another word for female egocentrism and greed) ensures that the top 20% of men will have multiple mates, and the bottom 20% none. Women generally on… | /r/MensRights | 03/01/19 05:53 AM |
| 2 | Resource: 4 Books Analysing Misandry, by Paul Nathanson & Katherine Youngrecorded and archived Thank you! A great resource. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/19 04:20 PM |
| 2 | Resource: 4 Books Analysing Misandry, by Paul Nathanson & Katherine YoungI'm sorry to say, your attitude is bigoted. Religious belief is not a great predictor of either morality or immorality. It certainly presents a possible bias. Again, bigotry. Einstein's belief in a divinity did not interfere with his physics. I wager Pascal's fervent Catholicism did not interfere with his mathematics. And Nathanson & Young's religious associations have not interfered with their analytical ability; they see misandry more clearly than do many SJW atheists. How did you find out thi… | /r/MensRights | 02/01/19 04:19 PM |
| 1 | "Feminist Porn"feminist porn isn't even worth discussing or debating as a concept Indeed. But it is fun to watch modern, feminist societies (in the article, American, Canadian, German, Swedish) twist themselves in knots, trying to make human sexuality conform to feminism. Get the popcorn! | /r/MensRights | 02/01/19 03:59 PM |
| 6 | Getting grabbed at parties and made fun of when when I think it’s not ok.Don't be ridiculous. It is the women who presume to touch, who are primarily at fault, even if the rest of society exacerbates the situation by mocking a male who complains. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/19 03:47 PM |
| -2 | Getting grabbed at parties and made fun of when when I think it’s not ok.Sorry, it is reasonable to make offensive touching criminal, but not reasonable to put it in the same category as assault. We don't put stealing a biscuit in the same category as murder even if both are certainly criminal. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/19 03:45 PM |
| 8 | Getting grabbed at parties and made fun of when when I think it’s not ok.You have an absolute right not to be touched! There are several problems with the way feminist Western society handles touching: If a man touches without consent (or is even accused of touching without consent), he gets crucified. If a woman does it, she gets away with it. Female Griffin will get away with it: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/abhal4/kathy_griffin_repeatedly_sexually_assaults/ed0qiog/ Male Pearson was taken to trial just for a ludicrous false accusation of touching wi… | /r/MensRights | 02/01/19 03:42 PM |
| 1 | A nightclub security video showing his rape accuser leading him to have sex caused a judge to toss the criminal case against him, declaring it did not meet the minimal pretrial evidential burden. USC expelled him anyway! He filed a civil suit & was just reinstated.Did the lawsuit join the false accusers themselves? (Many suits don't, as the false accusers haven't the deep pockets of the uni.) Long-term, will these due process abuses be stopped by holding just the uni responsible, or is it necessary to hold the false accusers themselves responsible? | /r/MensRights | 01/01/19 05:16 PM |
| 10 | Kathy Griffin repeatedly sexually assaults / sexually harasses Anderson Cooper on Live TVAs many here say, nothing will happen due to a double standard re-enforced by society: A man who looks crosswise at a woman has harmed her sexually and must be crucified. But a woman who behaves sexually with a male - from flirting to touch to kissing to sex - is doing him a favour and he should kiss her feet in gratitude. Any man unhappy about female sexual attention (much less files legal complaint) must be gay, or incel, or misogynist, or simply a crybaby, as others have said here. The result… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/19 05:11 PM |
| 2 | Why MR Has Made Little Progress in DecadesPeople actually know what MR is about now. No, they don't. They know the phrase "men's rights" as representing misogyny, not the true meaning of the phrase. Further, phrase recognition is not the same as actual accomplishment and has not helped us resist gynocracy. The internecine squabbling (left vs right, MRA vs MGTOW vs PUA vs TRP vs FR vs incel) is one reason for that failure. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/19 09:28 AM |
| 29 | Incels are a Symptom of a Bigger Problem With Male DepressionPart of the problem has not been expressed. At least in the young adult years, women are usually offered sex simply for existing - "genetic celebrities" is Farrell's term. Young men, on the other hand, still have to jump through hoops to be offered sex. That is, they must play the role of success object, or money object, or "fun object" (amusing to women), or physical object (akin to sex object). Some men are born knowing how to play one of these roles and thus get women into bed. Yet more men m… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/19 09:20 AM |
| 18 | Incels are a Symptom of a Bigger Problem With Male DepressionThe Braincel subreddit is full of men who want to imprison women as sex slaves, or simply hate the female gender. This is despicable, and ought not to be tolerated. Is their culture disgusting? How do we know that subreddit and its culture are in any way representative of the mass of incels? I suspect the majority of incels simply suffer in silence. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/19 09:04 AM |
| 3 | Incels are a Symptom of a Bigger Problem With Male DepressionThere is no such thing as a right to have sex. I disagree with the phrasing. Human beings, by existing, should have a right to food, shelter, medical care, and sex. However, that does not mean they've a right to use force or illegality to obtain those. Rather, it means society should be structured to provide those needs in a legitimate manner. [For example, I've read of ancient marriage contracts guaranteeing the wife a right to sex.] Still, much as the problems of poverty and hunger and homeles… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/19 09:01 AM |
| 3 | High-profile feminist tried to get college to dump professor for criticizing her, he saysYou're right. This looks like a falling-out among thieves. But Pakman does deserve credit for objecting to the politically-correct tendency to demonise or exclude white males on the sole basis of their identity. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/18 07:10 PM |
| 7 | High-profile feminist tried to get college to dump professor for criticizing her, he saysNonsense. Your noble skepticism of the male in a he-said-she-said will have no effect upon the thousands of (legal, academic, corporate, and social) cases in which a man's life is destroyed on the sole basis of a female's accusation. "BelieveTheWoman" has far more traction that "BelieveTheMan". Perhaps it's innate. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/18 07:09 PM |
| 3 | High-profile feminist tried to get college to dump professor for criticizing her, he saysHere are additional (non-Breitbart) references: The David Pakman Show https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUPf_UalrYQ And Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Siskind https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Pakman | /r/MensRights | 31/12/18 07:06 PM |
| 8 | High-profile feminist tried to get college to dump professor for criticizing her, he saysIdiot, threatening someone's job over political disagreement is Orwellian (or Stalinist). But that's your own approach, isn't it - throw mud at those standing up for freedom of thought. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/18 07:05 PM |
| 5 | High-profile feminist tried to get college to dump professor for criticizing her, he says/u/IronJohnMRA here has valid points - Boston College is indeed a religious institution, and it indeed tolerated the vicious Mary Daly for decades. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/18 07:01 PM |
| 1 | x Feminist Amy Siskind Tries to Get a Professor Fired for Disagreeing with HerYou'd prefer the misandrist Guardian or New York Times? | /r/MensRights | 31/12/18 06:59 PM |
| 2 | x Feminist Amy Siskind Tries to Get a Professor Fired for Disagreeing with HerI don't particularly favour Breitbart, but I don't particularly reject its stories, either; at least it's not so misandrist as "mainstream" publications like the Grauniad and NYT. At this point, they're all unreliable rumour mills. I reached the story through an aggregator and didn't realise the readers here too ideological, lazy, or incompetent to find their own sources of the story. Another poster, to his credit, did follow up by posting this link to the story in the College Fix: https://www.r… | /r/MensRights | 31/12/18 06:56 PM |
| 0 | x Feminist Amy Siskind Tries to Get a Professor Fired for Disagreeing with HerTranslation: /u/TheBananaKing is either too lazy or too incompetent to follow up, seeking other sources. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/18 06:54 PM |
| 9 | High-profile feminist tried to get college to dump professor for criticizing her, he saysThanks for the additional reference, though I'm not sure why the critics couldn't have done their own work. And College Fix is disliked by the feminist left almost as much as Breitbart. There is no evidence that she contacted the school, only his word. Hold on a moment. In rape cases, the woman's sole accusation is cited, in the law and in journalism, as "evidence" often sufficient for conviction to years or decades in prison. So, why is Pakman's accusation not "evidence"? Edit: Here is an argum… | /r/MensRights | 31/12/18 06:50 PM |
| 5 | x Feminist Amy Siskind Tries to Get a Professor Fired for Disagreeing with HerMaybe you've heard of the marvelous new inventions, Google and Youtube. Result: The David Pakman Show https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUPf_UalrYQ And Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Siskind https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Pakman Does that meet your ideological purity tests? | /r/MensRights | 31/12/18 04:04 PM |
| 0 | x Feminist Amy Siskind Tries to Get a Professor Fired for Disagreeing with HerThat's a silly approach. Every news source is both reliable and biased. Each is useful as a source of biased rumour, which can serve as a basis to compare or contrast to the other sources. Points of overlap are more likely to be true. Rather than dismissing any source out of hand (including misandrist "mainstream" sources such as the NYT) because it doesn't conform to your prejudices, the logical thing to do is to read the one source, then compare elements to other sources or to the article's cl… | /r/MensRights | 31/12/18 04:03 PM |
| 0 | Epic Intactivist Fail: "Iceland dumps proposed ban on male circumcision"Bullshit. Men's Rights involves dozens of issues, each person making his/her own personal decisions about each issue. Demanding conformity is bullying, a component of fascism. So take your bullying & stuff it. Edit: If you'd bothered to click once to see my previous posts, you'd know I don't oppose intactivists' goal of reducing the incidence of circumcision; I only oppose their foolish, fanatic strategy. Circumcision has been practiced for millennia, and one billion men are circumcised with lit… | /r/MensRights | 31/12/18 09:10 AM |
| 7 | x Feminist Amy Siskind Tries to Get a Professor Fired for Disagreeing with HerMaybe you've heard of the marvelous new inventions, Google and Youtube. Result: The David Pakman Show https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUPf_UalrYQ And Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Siskind https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Pakman | /r/MensRights | 31/12/18 07:18 AM |
| 1 | Mizzou Officials: Tall Men Asking Out Short Women Is Sexual MisconductA disproportionate number of those falsely accused at uni seem to be black. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/18 09:15 PM |
| 1 | If your living standard fails when your marriage ends it’s possible it was the way you were living before your marriage that was the problem and not the end of the marriage.I think I understand you. Couples or families save substantially over singles in shared housing, shared utilities, etc. And, of course, government is largely a male-to-female transfer scheme. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/18 05:34 PM |
| 5 | Mizzou Officials: Tall Men Asking Out Short Women Is Sexual MisconductThe problem is people who see problems everywhere. Hey, ya gotta problem wid dat? ;-} | /r/MensRights | 29/12/18 05:22 PM |
| 3 | The #MeToo War on MalesStopped reading after the first sentence. That's your loss. The journalist is female, so of course she pays lip service to #MeToo - but then goes on to shred it. The authors interviewed - Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young - are heroes who have published four thorough, detailed books documenting and criticising misandry: http://archive.li/KiEdp http://archive.li/xOMZr | /r/MensRights | 29/12/18 03:43 PM |
| 4 | The #MeToo War on MalesIt's encouraging that many below-the-line comments on the article are pro-male. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/18 03:30 AM |
| 8 | If your living standard fails when your marriage ends it’s possible it was the way you were living before your marriage that was the problem and not the end of the marriage.The article/study borders upon idiotic. The Australian Institute of Family Studies has found divorced people aged over 55 had less disposable income and fewer assets than their married counterparts Is a study really needed to prove the obvious - that splitting one household into two, using the same resources, usually lowers the living standard of both? It's simple mathematics: (x/2) < x. "I live in a $1 million apartment, he lives in a multi-million dollar house," she said. Aha - the true proble… | /r/MensRights | 26/12/18 11:00 PM |
| 2 | 73% of Top U.S. Universities Do Not Guarantee the Presumption of Innocence in Title IX Sexual Misconduct TrialsFeminism is a bit like polio charities; once it's had "success" in any endeavour, it needs to find another raison d'être. Once feminism attained the vote (without concomitant responsibilities), it moved on to the workplace. Once it had succeeded there, it moved on to sexuality, and so on. It created false spousal rape; it created the child molestation hysteria; it created false recovered memory syndrome; it created rape-by-regret. It's now creating false consent laws ("affirmative consent"). The… | /r/MensRights | 26/12/18 04:38 PM |
| 2 | Kevin Spacey faces criminal charge over alleged sexual assault of teenagerYou've never seen a guy or gal get "handsy" in a singles bar (especially when tipsy)? Not that I approve, but it's a far cry from rape and doesn't belong in the same legal regime. Often, in the past, the punishment has been a humiliating, public slap. How did Puritanism and feminism combine to make legal crucifixion seem an appropriate punishment? And why does Bill Clinton get Steinem's "one free grope," yet Spacey gets crucified? | /r/MensRights | 25/12/18 12:46 PM |
| 2 | The man-bashing train - full steam aheadOf course, I've been attacked for pointing out that having 90 percent of organisational leadership female might be problematic to men seeking a career in that organisation, and so ad infinitum. John Gordon and Ann Douglas have pointed out the role of nineteenth-century religion in facilitating female control over men: https://www.amazon.com/myth-monstrous-other-feminist-fables/dp/0872237583 https://www.amazon.com/Feminization-American-Culture-Ann-Douglas/dp/0374525587 | /r/MensRights | 25/12/18 06:28 AM |
| -2 | Kevin Spacey faces criminal charge over alleged sexual assault of teenagerThe case exemplifies both American Puritanism and the results of up-classification of any sexual pushiness. It's the same technique by which feminism has turned the uncouth or aggressive male proposition - often a necessary initiative if relationships are to be established - into a major crime. In the Unruh case, Spacey is accused of putting his hands down the pants of a young man in a gay bar and touching the young man's jewels. Crude? Yes. Unwelcome? Maybe. How could he manage that without som… | /r/MensRights | 25/12/18 06:00 AM |
| -1 | Kevin Spacey faces criminal charge over alleged sexual assault of teenagerSo many accusers that it is highly unlikely they are all lying. Nonsense. Numbers are no indication of truth. Examples abound. Among the most dramatic: Billions believe in the existence of a divinity. Much of "civilisation" at one time thought the earth flat. Much of "civilisation" at one time thought blacks inferior. Numbers of accusers at the Salem witch trials did not constitute truth and resulted in the judicially-approved murder of 20 innocent human beings for the crime of witchcraft. A dec… | /r/MensRights | 25/12/18 05:39 AM |
| 1 | Mis-Representation of Rohypnol by "Law & Order" and "Baby It's Cold" CriticsRegardless on the ideological camp you're in, you should know the truth and not try to wash out the past with modern lenses. Precisely! Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/18 05:14 PM |
| 2 | Mis-Representation of Rohypnol by "Law & Order" and "Baby It's Cold" CriticsInteresting comments from the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction: http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/drug-profiles/benzodiazepine Benzodiazepines, sexual assaults and other crimes Flunitrazepam (Rohypnol®) is the benzodiazepine most commonly linked by media reports to drug-facilitated sexual assaults, more commonly referred to as ‘date rape’. However, forensic toxicology shows that only a very small number of such assaults actually involve the use of flunitrazepam. A n… | /r/MensRights | 24/12/18 05:12 PM |
| 1 | Mis-Representation of Rohypnol by "Law & Order" and "Baby It's Cold" CriticsYou're lying, over and over. My entire point is that just because it wasn't marketed doesn't mean is wasn't used. Liar. Your point was somehow to put words into my mouth which I didn't say. OP used the never marketed statement as some sort of support that the drug is extremely rare. Liar. My original post explicitly pointed out marketed and available not the same, and /u/Bluelabel correctly called you on it. Further, you then attempt to further your lie by implying Rohypnol date rape use commonp… | /r/MensRights | 24/12/18 04:19 PM |
| 2 | Mis-Representation of Rohypnol by "Law & Order" and "Baby It's Cold" CriticsI feel like you're trying to put words into ops mouth with your statements. Thanks. Indeed, /u/no_condoments is doing exactly that. In fact, /u/no_condoments then proceeds to engage in more of the very mis-representation which is the topic of the OP. S/he states: Its definitely here. But Wiki states (with reference): Flunitrazepam has been referred to as a date rape drug, though the percentage of reported rape cases in which it is involved is small. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flunitrazepam In… | /r/MensRights | 24/12/18 03:31 PM |
| 3 | Anti-alimony, pro-shared custody, a reminder that the suffragists were on your side. Feminism is something else./u/Standard_Rules_Apply, I still thank the OP. As I've just written elsewhere on the thread, I'm pessimistic. The only egalitarian women these days, conceivably equivalent to the Suffragists, are the small group of "anti-feminists" including Paglia, Sommers, the late Karen DeCrow, the Honey Badgers, etc. But the Suffragette mentality has prevailed, with the simplest explanation being that's what women want and men give in. Nevertheless, a knowledge of history is always a good thing, especially i… | /r/MensRights | 23/12/18 04:11 PM |
| 5 | Anti-alimony, pro-shared custody, a reminder that the suffragists were on your side. Feminism is something else.I wouldn't be too optimistic. It is the violent, supremacist Suffragettes who are lionised today, not the Suffragists. The article's suffragist argument that women should contribute did not necessarily prevail - women's self-interest did. As Karen Straughan has pointed out, the law often required all the financial burden to be borne by the male, on pain of prison. To this day, as Farrell pointed out, (most married) women have the choice of working full-time, working part-time, or not working. Me… | /r/MensRights | 23/12/18 04:05 PM |
| -1 | Nevada Males, Say Goodbye to Any Hope for EqualityThese kinds of post titles are part of the reason why we have a bad rap. In other words, you're tone policing and trying to tell realistic MRAs to shut up. Screw you. As for your contention that They won’t necessarily be bad for our equality just because they’re women. That's extremely naïve and factually wrong. That's unsupported by any evidence; you give none, just generalised platitudes. In fact, the objective evidence says the opposite of your claim. Women favour women: https://www.apa.org/m… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/18 11:47 PM |
| 0 | Nevada Males, Say Goodbye to Any Hope for EqualityTheir gender is pretty irrelevant. Sorry, but That's extremely naïve and factually wrong. That's unsupported by any evidence; you give none, just generalised platitudes. In fact, the objective evidence says the opposite of your claim. Women favour women: https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women.aspx https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2c44/14cde6b6a011e9f4910e6389d658278e3a7a.pdf https://www.purdue.edu/uns/html4ever/2004/041213.Goodwin.gender.html Women are nearly five times more likely to show an a… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/18 11:45 PM |
| 5 | Detailed analysis of the media narative on a rape caseWhat sexual impropriety? There was none. Carceral feminism works by turning ordinary mating and ordinary courtship into a crime. Thanks to OP for the thorough analysis. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/18 12:13 PM |
| 4 | "Jamestown" and Gender IssuesThe programme seems to show every matter from the limited point of view of a few female protagonists, thus avoiding major issues of: governance and survival of the entire colony the difficulties of the male half of the population, including very heavy-handed control and punishment by authority: http://www.history.org/foundation/journal/spring03/branks.cfm | /r/MensRights | 10/12/18 03:18 PM |
| 4 | Lies, Damned Lies, and StatisticsMost studies estimate 6% - 8% or sometimes 10% as the upper bound for false reports, with false accusations being maybe half or 2/3 of those. A blatant lie. The proportion of false accusations is ~ 40%. /u/antilopes has consistently parroted the fake feminist figures on false rape accusations, ignoring a number of MRA attempts to set him straight. I wonder what he's doing here. The issue has been previously discussed: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9nhx71/only_2_of_rape_allegations… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/18 02:48 PM |
| 2 | Lies, Damned Lies, and StatisticsNote that the FBI "8% unfounded" statistic is also mis-represented: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4w1z94/information_about_fbi_8_unfounded_accusation/ TLDR: The famed FBI figure of 8% represents a lower bound of provably wrongful accusations, as collated from local police reports. That is, the FBI states that at least 8% are provably wrongful. The FBI does not deem the remaining 92% true; in fact, many of the 92% may also be false. Of interest as well: http://www.datagoneodd.com/b… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/18 08:32 PM |
| 1 | Karen Straughan Hits Nail on Head: "Men in power do not act in the interests of men as a class. They are more likely to act in the interests of women at the expense of men."You have a sample size problem. The issue is more legal than social. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/18 08:28 PM |
| 1 | Karen Straughan Hits Nail on Head: "Men in power do not act in the interests of men as a class. They are more likely to act in the interests of women at the expense of men."Why just "the States"? No country has yet banned circumcision. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/18 08:26 PM |
| 4 | Denmark begs men to have sex with its feministsBut what percentage of Western women support feminist goals even while disclaiming feminism? It must be considerable - otherwise, how did society become so feminist, misandrist, twisted? It cannot be just a few feminists in a corner, eh? | /r/MensRights | 08/12/18 08:20 AM |
| 1 | Karen Straughan Hits Nail on Head: "Men in power do not act in the interests of men as a class. They are more likely to act in the interests of women at the expense of men."Thank you! It's interesting that these studies find bias for women, then cherry-pick areas in which to claim bias against. Would you have the full text? | /r/MensRights | 05/12/18 11:38 AM |
| 70 | Karen Straughan Hits Nail on Head: "Men in power do not act in the interests of men as a class. They are more likely to act in the interests of women at the expense of men."women generally have an in-group bias Indeed. Here's a study proving women's in-group bias: https://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/041213.Goodwin.gender.html https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2c44/14cde6b6a011e9f4910e6389d658278e3a7a.pdf men have an out-group bias I think Karen and yourself quite correct, but it would be nice were a study to dare to examine this. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/18 01:54 PM |
| 270 | Karen Straughan Hits Nail on Head: "Men in power do not act in the interests of men as a class. They are more likely to act in the interests of women at the expense of men."Karen's put her finger on the truth that men in power do not act in the interests of men as a class. They are more likely to act in the interests of women at the expense of men. This fact may be exactly the reason why: Majorities of men in political and social institutions does not mean women oppressed. It's not strictly true that "we need more women in power for the good of women". More women in power might in fact be dangerous to equality and to men's human rights: Women in power favour women,… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/18 01:06 PM |
| 5 | Is "incel" being used as an insult just a PC way to call someone a virgin?The assholes are those who demonise incels, innocents victimised by modern feminism as well as by traditional society's expectations of men. Society has always required men to jump through hoops before being allowed sexual release and companionship. Men who cannot perform deserve help, not derision. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/18 12:57 PM |
| 9 | Is "incel" being used as an insult just a PC way to call someone a virgin?Yes the genuine ones are vile Sorry, I've known genuine ones. They're not vile at all; they're in pain and deserve help. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/18 12:54 PM |
| 1 | Women are being asked to record ‘consent videos’ before sex by men who are afraid they’ll be accused of rape or assaultAre you implying there is a significant chance of a woman recovering discarded sperm to impregnate herself, then file a false fatherhood claim against you? That's extremely unlikely, especially if you discard the sperm in the loo. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/18 12:51 PM |
| 1 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightHaha. You failed to answer the questions: Are you really unable to understand the difference between (legal) verbal altercation and (illegal) physical altercation? Worse, are you unable to understand the absurdity of comparing unsubstantiated claim of verbal offence, to murder? It's idiots like you who disgrace men and humanity. And ensure men remain under the emotional thumb of women, whether the form is white knighting or any other. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/18 07:00 PM |
| 5 | A good list of stats on Male Victims of Intimate Partner Violencehttps://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm "REFERENCES EXAMINING ASSAULTS BY WOMEN ON THEIR SPOUSES OR MALE PARTNERS: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY" "This bibliography examines 286 scholarly investigations: 221 empirical studies and 65 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 371,600." | /r/MensRights | 02/12/18 06:57 PM |
| 13 | Women are being asked to record ‘consent videos’ before sex by men who are afraid they’ll be accused of rape or assaultYou are right for the most part. It's pretty unreliable to attempt to predict which women will or will not eventually turn on you. Though some of us have done so successfully. Do not masturbate. But what's unsafe about masturbation? Perhaps nature invented it to relieve the pressure without commitment? | /r/MensRights | 01/12/18 11:09 AM |
| 6 | Women are being asked to record ‘consent videos’ before sex by men who are afraid they’ll be accused of rape or assaultThe problem with NAWALT is not whether it's true or false. The problem is telling the goodies from the baddies determining whether the goodies are 25% of women (MRA assumption) or <<5% of women (MGTOW assumption). | /r/MensRights | 01/12/18 11:03 AM |
| 1 | NYT Opinion: "Let Women Be WarriorsShe was a Communications Officer (0602), not an Infantry Officer (0302). Good catch. Thanks. Her whole piece is an example of card-stacking, which is how most journo-propaganda is written. Suspected as much. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/18 12:39 AM |
| 2 | Why Shouldn’t College Students Have the Equivalent of Miranda Rights?You should read the article. The author said "equivalent of Miranda rights". He did not say, "exactly Miranda rights". College courts are involved in a substantive process and thus have been adjudged by more than one Federal court to owe the student due process. Here, for example, cross-examination is required: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/09/10/appeals-court-ruling-opens-door-boosted-due-process-rights By the same token, college courts involved in judging possible criminal activity … | /r/MensRights | 24/11/18 12:36 AM |
| 5 | NYT Opinion: "Let Women Be WarriorsIndeed. Notice the article's author claims at once that women in the military can handle bullets and bombs but cannot handle "harassment" (because harassment hurts their feelings). | /r/MensRights | 23/11/18 03:48 PM |
| 8 | NYT Opinion: "Let Women Be WarriorsThe author claims: Physical standards are gender-neutral. But I wonder: Is this true? Has the author cherry-picked? Are those "standards" already diluted? Will men end up picking up the slack for females? | /r/MensRights | 23/11/18 03:42 PM |
| 5 | Gynocentric Display: "The Worst Things Men Do While Traveling, According to Women"Ha. Great point! | /r/MensRights | 23/11/18 03:27 PM |
| 21 | Gynocentric Display: "The Worst Things Men Do While Traveling, According to Women"Notice that almost every woman commenting expects the male to do exactly as she wishes. Feminism has educated Western women to expect the male to conform to the female in all ways. And to carry her bags. | /r/MensRights | 23/11/18 10:37 AM |
| 1 | This woman on my 'friends' thinks my shared info from international men's day is a hate post about women.Is that Maajid Nawaz himself? He's an interesting fellow, the founder of Quilliam. | /r/MensRights | 23/11/18 10:27 AM |
| 2 | Democrats: Men and women are equal in their talents and abilities. Also, women are superior.Legal, Occupational, and Education discrimination It's curious that you included the ostensible areas of discrimination against women and left out the areas in which men are (and have long been) the victims of discrimination: longevity parental rights right to one's own labour and earnings right to be innocent until proved guilty by evidence equal presence in those disciplines (human resources, social work) which determine the male's fate in personnel or judicial disagreement with the female The… | /r/MensRights | 23/11/18 01:00 AM |
| 1 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightThank you for admitting - by your descent to insults - that you are intellectually incapable of rebutting my arguments (as well as those of /u/Adanu0). | /r/MensRights | 22/11/18 06:20 PM |
| 1 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightAre you really unable to understand the difference between (legal) verbal altercation and (illegal) physical altercation? Worse, are you unable to understand the absurdity of comparing unsubstantiated claim of verbal offence, to murder? No, I suppose it's beyond the capacity of your lonely grey cell. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/18 06:17 PM |
| 1 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightGenerally, I've opposed civil commitment and other processes which assume future criminality before it has happened. However, /u/MadTrini is right - /u/hurdy__gurdy__man's wrath is a crime waiting to happen. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/18 06:14 PM |
| 0 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightAnd violent criminals like you belong in prison. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/18 06:12 PM |
| 1 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightBullshit. If your brother assaults another man over comments to you, both of you belong in prison. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/18 06:12 PM |
| 1 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightAnd you'd wind up in prison where you belong, as a barbaric, misandrist, savage criminal. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/18 06:11 PM |
| 1 | Bravo! Female Biology Professor Calls out "Toxic Femininity" in BRILLIANT EssayHeather E. Heying deserves considerable credit for speaking truth to feminist power. The core argument: Young women have vast sexual power. Everyone who is being honest with themselves knows this: Women in their sexual prime who are anywhere near the beauty-norms for their culture have a kind of power that nobody else has. They are also all but certain to lack the wisdom to manage it. Toxic femininity is an abuse of that power, in which hotness is maximized, and victim status is then claimed whe… | /r/MensRights | 22/11/18 05:37 PM |
| 5 | If Women want equal pay for “77c on the male dollar” then men deserve equal tax rights as we pay 200c on every dollar. TL;DR average woman are a net 150k drain from taxes in a lifetime. Guess which evil gender foots the bill?"relámpago furioso" ~ "furious lightning" in Spanish | /r/MensRights | 22/11/18 04:36 PM |
| 6 | Democrats: Men and women are equal in their talents and abilities. Also, women are superior.The disease that republicans represent is far more dangerous than democrats. I dispute that. The Republicans are only misandrist during the short periods when they fall back into traditional misandry (the male obligated to the protective role, with nothing in return). The Democrats, on the other hand, are permanently, virulently, and viciously misandrist, having forced upon men: reverse discrimination multiple schemes to destroy innocent men, from the child molestation hysteria, to false spousal… | /r/MensRights | 22/11/18 04:30 PM |
| 1 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightThis should be made evident by the individual your attempting to defend, who feels it's OK to verbally assault a teenage girl unprovoked. You're piling foolishness on foolishness. "Verbally assault" is an oxymoron. Verbal conflicts are not assaults and should not be turned into assault by weasel-wording. So now you think a man hasn't a right to a defence when accused by a female? Sounds much like the barbaric philosophy of the KKK - one group has no right to a defence. "Teenage girl" shows you'r… | /r/MensRights | 14/11/18 11:04 AM |
| 1 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightYou need to take a step back and really think about why it's ok to assault men over stupid verbal confrontations. Precisely. /u/Adanu0 is spot on. Verbal confrontations are usually legal even if unpleasant. Physical confrontation is criminal. It's grotesque for MRAs in this case to justify the gynocentric principle of "assault men over stupid verbal confrontations". | /r/MensRights | 14/11/18 10:54 AM |
| 1 | MGTOWs and MRAs Now Subscibe to #believethewoman?You're wasting our time and yours. So, this is the last time I'll address your drivel, point by point: As I informed you and you ignored, comments on one sub-reddit may be the subject of comments anywhere else on the entire net. You have no right whatsoever to want to restrict comments to a single board, especially in an area such as gender relations of interest to many stripes. Learn to read. I didn't say you were MRA. I said MGTOWs have a right to know of incidents supporting their contention … | /r/MGTOW | 12/11/18 02:23 PM |
| 0 | Strange: MRAs Think It Wrong to Criticise a Beautiful Woman's HypergamyMRAs believe if they fulfil the proper response as a man, women will magically fulfil their role as women. You're wrong. I've been an MRA for years and do not believe that. In fact, MRAs do not believe much of what MGTOWs attribute to them. Nor do I believe much of what MRAs attribute to MGTOWs, TRPs, PUAs, and incels. It's shocking to see the walls and animosity (bordering on hatred) between groups which should be allies. Each group has its faults (including the lamentable MRA white-knighting).… | /r/MGTOW | 12/11/18 02:13 PM |
| 0 | Strange: MRAs Think It Wrong to Criticise a Beautiful Woman's HypergamyYes, who cares. I do - and so should any "woke" male. The lack of solidarity in the manosphere (MRAs, MGTOWs, TRPs, PUAs, fathers' rights, incels) is shocking and self-defeating: https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/9w9ayt/mgtows_and_mras_now_subscibe_to_believethewoman/e9jildx/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9u12wn/we_need_to_make_it_clear_that_the_tallahassee/e90s0wq/ The manosphere would advance further were it to heed the point of Franklin's adage that "we must all hang toge… | /r/MGTOW | 12/11/18 02:02 PM |
| 1 | MGTOWs and MRAs Now Subscibe to #believethewoman?You're correct. Indeed, I've just made a comment criticising the way Carlson and Hannity have handled the false accusations against Keith Ellison: https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9w43w7/tucker_carlsons_son_acts_the_white_knight/e9jl9q5/ | /r/MGTOW | 12/11/18 01:07 PM |
| 1 | MGTOWs and MRAs Now Subscibe to #believethewoman?This is a public debate. You have no right to insist it private, when you post your comment on boards seen by millions. There are a number of disagreements between MRAs and MGTOWs. One of them is white knighting by MRAs. So MGTOWs deserve to know about egregious cases of white knighting by MRAs. If you make public comments and are not prepared to defend them in any venue, then you shouldn't make them public in the first place. On the net and even on Reddit, public comments in one venue are often… | /r/MGTOW | 12/11/18 01:03 PM |
| 1 | This just illustrates how petty females are when they feel slighted and the lengths they will go to for vengeance.Remember that women that got 2 men fired because she overheard a mild sex joke between the two men sitting in front of her. You may be referring to Donglegate at PyCon: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/03/how-dongle-jokes-got-two-people-fired-and-led-to-ddos-attacks/ Two developers made a joke. The woman sitting in front of them, Adria Richards, made a complaint. One of the developers was fired. Then Richards' employer suffered a DDOS attack, so it fired her: https://arstechnica.com/tech… | /r/MGTOW | 12/11/18 12:54 PM |
| 2 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightThe media emphasis on offence to Carlson's females is pure gynocentrism; if proved, offence or intimidation of any family member, male or female, is reprehensible. That stated, I'm not so sure Carlson generally deserves MRA sympathy. His segments on Ellison discuss mostly peripheral matters and not the fabricated aspect of the "evidence" against Ellison: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fBwvk7l2jI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O294jCmn-o And the segments by Carlson's colleague Sean Hannity li… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/18 09:05 AM |
| -3 | Melania Trump says women 'need evidence' if they say they're victimsWhoa! Where do we get all these lily-livered, craven, gelded, submissive males and feminist females? What do the first two points have to do with the last one? Are you so stupid that you need an explanation of the nexus of female privilege? Are hypergamy and modeling supposed to be deplorable things? Indeed, they are. Hypergamy exploits men, and modeling dramatically and artificially inflates the worth of the female body, the better to manipulate men. Also at issue in modeling is the extremely i… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/18 08:48 AM |
| 1 | Melania Trump says women 'need evidence' if they say they're victimsTo summarise: Melania engaged in extreme hypergamy. Prior to hypergamy, she used her female body for a living (modeling). Yet, when even she recognises one male human right (innocent until proved guilty), we're grateful. Edit: Let's be philosophical about it: At least something is better than nothing - and likely far more than men would have had from Hillary. Melania appears to like men, while Hillary appears to despise them. (Sigh) | /r/MensRights | 12/11/18 08:11 AM |
| 16 | Melania Trump says women 'need evidence' if they say they're victimsWhen someone on this sub tells a story about how they lost custody of their kids, to their abusive ex-wife, no one asks for evidence. Bullshit. The correct and justifiable emphasis in this sub is not what claims we MRAs believe but what claims the courts believe. Men's loss of children in courts and custody and parental alienation are visible, quantifiable, and documented; courts should not be engaged in such obvious and provable injustice. In contrast, use of false accusations of sexual impropr… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/18 08:09 AM |
| 1 | MGTOWs and MRAs Now Subscibe to #believethewoman?I said I would call it white knight behaviour if it was for a random women, but this is regarding his daughter. I'm aware of no such distinction in the general use of the term "white-knighting". It would be commonplace to define white-knighting as the lamentable and foolish male act of reflexively supporting the female against the male regardless of logic, reason, rationality, fairness, or morality, and also regardless of the individual situation. | /r/MGTOW | 12/11/18 07:44 AM |
| 2 | MGTOWs and MRAs Now Subscibe to #believethewoman?We’ve known for years “Men’s Rights Advocates” are overweight beta cucks desperately trying to get themselves laid; I’ve made multiple posts illustrating this. You may be right. MRAs certainly do seem to sometimes choose self-defeating attitudes. As an MRA, I've argued (generally fruitlessly) to MRAs that: All men's philosophies and groups (MRA, MGTOW, TRP, PUA, Fathers' Rights, incels) are red-pilled, "woke" men who should be brothers rather than enemies. Each such group has an absolute right i… | /r/MGTOW | 12/11/18 07:40 AM |
| 1 | How to Challenge the "Fresh Complaint Rule"?/u/DavidByron2, the left's record with respect to men's rights certainly does not conform to its claims of seeking equality for all. As I commented here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9v9ycc/cnn_white_houses_move_to_pull_acostas_press_pass/e9hhrw5/ BigBossMan wrote: Men's Right's is a bi-partisan issue. Mens-Advocate responded: It should be, but isn't. I've argued MR should behave as European third parties, making only temporary alliances with whichever parties advance our issues.… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/18 07:22 AM |
| 1 | How to Challenge the "Fresh Complaint Rule"?Exactly. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/18 07:17 AM |
| 3 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White Knight/u/Adanu0 is correct; Carlson Jr committed assault. It's disgusting to see MRAs justify criminality in the course of white knighting for a female whom they just believe #believethewoman. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/18 01:47 AM |
| 2 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightYour degeneration to ad-hominem pejoratives proves you have nothing of substance to say. There are "grown ass men" in teaching whose lives and careers have been destroyed by false accusations from teenage girls. And some of those men have committed suicide. So, yes, teenage girls' lies can be deadly. As for your insults, two can play at that game. Or maybe you cannot since your lone grey cell died. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/18 01:02 AM |
| 4 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightWell, well. Suddenly, so many MRAs #believethewoman. How pitiful. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 11:33 PM |
| 5 | MRAs Remain White KnightsBullshit. Only white Knights and bullies unsure of their masculinity criminally assault another male over verbal insult to a female. The legally and morally proper way to handle it is for the daughter to file a complaint with the club management. And don't try that bullshit that teenage girls are delicate flowers needing protection. Teenage girls had 20 people murdered at Salem. So Carlson's daughter should be capable of simply making a complaint to the club management. And it's hypocritical to … | /r/MGTOW | 11/11/18 08:43 PM |
| 5 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightTeenage girls are no saints and are quite capable of taking care of themselves. In fact, at Salem, teenage girls had a number of "grown ass" men murdered. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 07:55 PM |
| 1 | Finland, the first country that (allegedly) gave all citizens the right to vote and run for the parliament, actually, gave men the same rights, women enjoyed, 36 years later. 1906-1944 conscripted men didn't have the right to vote during the two-years-long mandatory military service.The 20% should have objected aloudly. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 07:42 PM |
| 1 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightAnd you are a gelded coward without the balls to stand up to female manipulation. It's cowards like you who have allowed feminist society to destroy men's human rights. And your justification of assault makes you criminal as well. You belong in prison with Carlson Jr. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 07:29 PM |
| 2 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White Knight/u/Adanu0 is correct. Carlson's son committed assault, a crime. The uncouth member who insulted Carlson's daughter committed no crime (though likely did commit an infraction of club rules, thus meriting ejection). | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 05:24 PM |
| 2 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightReport the man to the relevant authorities, and be done with it. Precisely! /u/Adanu0 has understood what MRAs have not. /u/Adanu0, I'm MRA, but this and other examples prove the MGTOWs entirely correct when they complain too many MRAs have been infected by the white knight germ (or else are too cowardly to challenge feminist mores). | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 05:22 PM |
| 6 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightSorry, Carlson and his son are wrong, and so are you. If you insult me at the grocer's, it doesn't entitle me to strike you. And if you insult my wife at the grocer's, that's even less a ground for me to strike you. Striking anyone is criminal in all cases; offence is not grounds. It is grounds for my wife to object to the grocer and for the grocer to ask the offending customer to leave. Similarly, the Carlson daughter should have reported the matter to club management. That is, assuming she's t… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 05:19 PM |
| 2 | Cafe Charges Men 18% 'Man Tax' to Fight Gender Pay GapSorry, that's an inadequate response to discrimination in public accommodation, which is blatantly illegal in most of the civilised world. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 05:08 PM |
| 3 | Cafe Charges Men 18% 'Man Tax' to Fight Gender Pay GapBringing parental courts rights and crime punishments into an argument on coffee prices is hilariously misplaced. No more misplaced than bringing fictional pay gaps into the price of a cup of coffee. You're quite the hypocrite, aren't you? | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 05:06 PM |
| 55 | Men are afraid to revive women because of the epidemic of false sexual assault accusationsFor decades, political pressure has prevented government and academia from doing professional and equitable studies. In fact, those who have attempted such studies (Suzanne Steimetz, R.L. McNeely, others) have jeopardised or destroyed their careers. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 04:21 PM |
| 3 | Men are afraid to revive women because of the epidemic of false sexual assault accusationsNot to BLAME them Why not blame them? It's not usually men making the false accusations. You'll say we shouldn't blame women generally. But feminism has succeeded by blaming men generally. So, if we don't invert the technique, we can be noble but continue losing; nice guys finish last. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 04:18 PM |
| 8 | Finland, the first country that (allegedly) gave all citizens the right to vote and run for the parliament, actually, gave men the same rights, women enjoyed, 36 years later. 1906-1944 conscripted men didn't have the right to vote during the two-years-long mandatory military service.It was only men's mass death in WW1 which inspired the UK elites to finally extend universal suffrage to all men. (I think Karen Straughan may have pointed this out.) | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 04:14 PM |
| 1 | Cafe Charges Men 18% 'Man Tax' to Fight Gender Pay GapGreat video - thanks! (Hoff Sommers and Peterson come through as usual.) | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 04:13 PM |
| 3 | Cafe Charges Men 18% 'Man Tax' to Fight Gender Pay GapThe "tax" and the preferential seating are still discrimination. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 04:08 PM |
| 5 | Cafe Charges Men 18% 'Man Tax' to Fight Gender Pay GapExcellent post - the text of the law. Apparently the law is contradictory. 22(1)(b) would seem to bar the cafe's "terms or conditions", while the "special measures" clauses in 7 would seem to allow it. But a clever attorney representing men need only argue that the "special measures" clauses do not apply: The café itself already has equality between men and women without its anti-male programmes. That is, the café presumably pays women and men equally and (used to) charge men and women equally; … | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 04:04 PM |
| 5 | Cafe Charges Men 18% 'Man Tax' to Fight Gender Pay GapNo, in most jurisdictions, it's not legal to treat male and female customers differently in places of public accommodation, "optionally" or not. See my post elsewhere on the thread. Should a railroad or underground be able to make men "optionally" stand whenever a woman wants a seat? Should courts "optionally" deprive men of their children, or of the right to cross-examine an accuser? Edit: /u/DougDante has kindly posted the exact Aus laws, which apparently try to carve out "special measures" ex… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 03:57 PM |
| 3 | Cafe Charges Men 18% 'Man Tax' to Fight Gender Pay GapYes, this is illegal under concepts propagated by feminism itself: The differential treatment of male and female customers, however "voluntary", constitutes a hostile environment. Priotity seating for females is similarly illegal discrimination. Of course, the real reason for such nonsense is the failure of men to make the same fuss as women. Australian males have more balls than most, but apparently there are neither male patrons nor male attorneys with the balls or determination to use similar… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 03:54 PM |
| 1 | CNN: White House's move to pull Acosta's press pass was based on 'fraudulent accusations'Men's Right's is a bi-partisan issue. It should be, but isn't. I've argued MR should behave as European third parties, making only temporary alliances with whichever parties advance our issues. However, reality indicates a decades-long pattern of the left advancing feminism, including such viciously anti-male ideas as positive discrimination (affirmative action), affirmative consent, trial and conviction in oath-on-oath cases of rape accusation (including false accusation of spousal rape as a we… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 03:43 PM |
| 5 | Tucker Carlson's Son Acts the White KnightWhite-knighting puts men in competition to do women's bidding and receive female approval. Carlson's son should not have "confronted" anyone at all; he did not witness the objectionable behaviour and so has no right to assert such knowledge. Since Carlson's statement admits the son threw a glass of wine in another's face, the son should be prosecuted for assault. That's not an acceptable way to respond to the (unidentified) club member's rudeness. Instead, Carlson's daughter is old enough to hav… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 02:59 PM |
| 1 | CNN: White House's move to pull Acosta's press pass was based on 'fraudulent accusations'Nobody was assaulted in that video I disagree. When reporter Michelle Fields - a self-promoter like Acosta - illegally breached the security cordon around candidate Trump, aide Lewandowski pulled her aside. Though security personnel and bouncers commonly manhandle males who break the rules, because Fields was female, Lewandowski was charged with battery (later dropped). If the same absurd standards are applied to liberal males like Acosta as are applied to conservative males like Lewandowski, ma… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 05:39 AM |
| 1 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.So, apparently, are you. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/18 03:58 AM |
| 1 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.I don't understand. Incels are men in pain due to women's indifference. Men expend significant effort to offer women courting and emotional and sexual companionship. Women expend far less effort (if any) to offer men the same. How is the discrepancy not a men's issue? And how are men in pain not a men's issue? | /r/MensRights | 10/11/18 03:56 AM |
| 2 | Database ResearchProfessor Eugene August wrote an extensive men's studies bibliography: https://books.google.com/books/about/The_New_Men_s_Studies.html?id=SLIYAQAAIAAJ | /r/MensRights | 10/11/18 03:49 AM |
| 2 | MRAs Disavow MGTOWs, Incels, Etc?They should be listen and helped, not marginalized. Bravo! | /r/MGTOW | 05/11/18 11:09 AM |
| 4 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.Men are held to such standards and expectations that some men can just not fulfill because of both what they look like and who they are. This leads a lot of men to unwilling loneliness and this should be a men's rights issue. MRAs should prioritize talking about the dynamics in male-female relations and male gender norms. Hurrah! /u/watch_for_ice is willing to treat incels as human beings. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/18 11:04 AM |
| 2 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.legalizing sex work would be a relatively easy way to help resolve any issue incels may have. Well, not any issues; an incel's purchase of an hour of a prostitute's attention may temporarily blunt the sexual frustration but certainly would do nothing to satisfy the human need for emotional company. Still, were it legal and had Rodger and Beierle followed that path, they might not have become violent. But, in an era of "outreach" to every Jane with a problem, why did social services miss these fe… | /r/MensRights | 05/11/18 11:01 AM |
| 7 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.I don't know whether the incel thing is a men's rights issue. But I DO think it's more deserving of human compassion than parroting feminist platitudes about entitlement. And a little compassion might actually prevent events like the one at the Yoga Studio. Hurrah for this! Karen's spot on, as usual. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/18 10:47 AM |
| 10 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours./u/JewishAnomaly may have a point: Much of feminism and feminists have, as their objective, destroying the lives of innocent men as a "power trip". There is more than a bit of cruelty and sadism in the way feminism destroys any man who dares to present a challenge, any man who opposes what a woman wants (such as sole custody), any man who gets on the wrong side of a woman (as regretted sex or skepticism of feminism). To destroy a man's life, a malicious woman has a tremendous range of tools, fro… | /r/MensRights | 05/11/18 06:06 AM |
| 4 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.Here is an article discussing two of the four attackers (since Lépine) named by Karen: http://archive.is/8UKOC The article ascribes these crimes to "misogyny and racism". I remain incredulous that the author would simplistically conclude misogyny causes violence, rather than the obvious causative factor of involuntary celibacy. Human beings need emotional and sexual company; enforced celibacy causes bitter misery, which causes the mind to twist, which in some cases causes misogyny, which in some… | /r/MensRights | 05/11/18 05:55 AM |
| 2 | MRAs Disavow MGTOWs, Incels, Etc?Basically they try to ban people describing AWALT,to pamper feminist feelings. But they were not holding back blame generally MGTOW,PUA and incels. Great point! Why is it wrong to generalise or stereotype women, but not wrong to generalise or stereotype MGTOWs, PUAs, and incels? Personally, I'm MRA; I still think solid relationships possible. But I can readily understand the quite reasonable thoughts of MGTOWs, PUAs, TRPs, and incels, all of whom have a right to conduct their own lives as they s… | /r/MGTOW | 05/11/18 05:01 AM |
| 3 | MRAs Disavow MGTOWs, Incels, Etc?Over 20 states have default 50/50 parenting time. It's growing. Man, are you naïve. Ostensibly neutral laws have not that often been applied in practice, and even then after the father has engaged in an exhaustive fight which drains him of money and energy. in Illinois the child support calculations are getting fairer Once again, you're naïve. If parents really had custody 50/50, there'd be no reason for child support; each parent would be responsible for his or her half. Fairness is no child su… | /r/MGTOW | 05/11/18 04:56 AM |
| 3 | MRAs Disavow MGTOWs, Incels, Etc?Just a heads up I do actually care about incels. Good fellow! Now try to explain to the world - including, outrageously, even MRAs - why we should care. | /r/MGTOW | 05/11/18 02:11 AM |
| 5 | MRAs Disavow MGTOWs, Incels, Etc?For example, in the states, 50/50 parenting time is starting to become more common. It's taken half a century since "women's lib" hit in the 1960's, for men to have a significant chance of equal parenting. At that, joint custody runs about 25% (not 100%). Joint custody orders are often ignored, parental alienation is rife, and any father demanding joint custody risks retaliatory false charges of spousal battery or spousal rape. So, no, MR has not achieved all that much to date. Some may be error… | /r/MGTOW | 05/11/18 02:08 AM |
| 3 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.Karen Straughan has given a number of names. But four over a decade is minuscule compared to the total of loony-shooter incidents, especially in the USA. Of course we'll always be blamed; the media, as the SPLC, will hyperventilate about the shooter being MR even if it's not true. Still, it's not mutually exclusive to both denounce the perpetrators loudly and still make the point that unaddressed or even suppressed grievances in any group inevitably lead to violence. | /r/MensRights | 04/11/18 11:45 PM |
| 10 | MRAs Disavow MGTOWs, Incels, Etc?Apparently, MRAs find controversial my assertion that. MRAs, MGTOWs, TRPs, PUAs, fathers-rights activists and incels are all red-pilled men whose humanity and issues are suppressed by feminist society; all should be brothers under the skin. Each group (particularly incels) suffers in its way and deserves moral support for peaceable redress of its issues. | /r/MGTOW | 04/11/18 09:12 PM |
| 7 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.Karen, you have four data points post-1989. That's much too small a sample for any conclusions. In fact, considering the many incidents involving Muslim and African-American resentments bursting into violence, straight white males would seem quite a tame lot - four incidents in the past ten years is barely a blip compared to other "causes". | /r/MensRights | 04/11/18 08:32 PM |
| 13 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.That may be true in some cases, but not all. Do we give up on people who have had a nervous breakdown? And society has all sorts of services for women with problems - women who become single mothers; women who cannot support their offspring; women who abandon their offspring; women who are unhappy in their existing relationship; women who never supported themselves, then divorce, etc. So why is it that society bothers so little to help men with problems? Don't male lives matter? | /r/MensRights | 04/11/18 06:12 PM |
| 10 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.The number of such incidents appears to be increasing Really? Can this be substantiated? Not to be cavalier about murderers, but two swallows (Elliott Rodger and his yoga-shooter fan Beierle) do not a spring make. That is, two incidents are not much of a trend in a country of thousands of murders annually and a mass-murder incident almost every month or two. (Many unis, schools and companies now do "active-shooter" prep.) Prior to Rodger and Beierle, were there any gender-related such mass-murde… | /r/MensRights | 04/11/18 05:51 PM |
| 5 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.You're right - MRM has barely progressed in a century. MR's only unambiguous success in the past half-century is the conversion of take-our-daughters-to-work day into take-our-daughters-and-sons-to-work day. The reasons for MR's failure are amply evident on this thread - internecine disputes, unwillingness to support other men's issues (such as PUAs or involuntary celibacy or MGTOWs or ...), and above all the cowardice to run from the "hardball" argument that unaddressed human rights issues caus… | /r/MensRights | 04/11/18 05:23 PM |
| 10 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.We have, in your comment and this thread generally, an illustration of one of the profound reasons why men's rights (vis-a-vis feminism and gynocentrism) have not advanced in centuries: Emphasising internecine squabbling ("we need to condemn incels") over unity and advancement Unwillingness to learn from the opposition and other movements, which use violence (by women, by African-Americans, by Muslims) to make the point that human grievances must be addressed or violence is inevitable Instinct t… | /r/MensRights | 04/11/18 05:19 PM |
| -5 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.I disagree. MRAs, MGTOWs, TRPs, PUAs, fathers-rights activists and incels are all red-pilled men whose humanity and issues are suppressed by feminist society; all should be brothers under the skin. Each group (particularly incels) suffers in its way and deserves moral support for peaceable redress of its issues. We should handle incidents of violence by any members exactly the way most human rights movements (including at times civil rights, black lives matter, feminism, etc) handle violent inci… | /r/MensRights | 04/11/18 07:11 AM |
| 21 | How Not to Return to the Spotlight | Feminist whines that Aziz Ansari is back but, like other victims of the #MeToo witch hunt, he hasn't apologised. Why should he?Excuse me, why are you engaging in "slut-shaming" of Ansari? He's not a scumbag, and is a decent man. His wanting and obtaining consensual sex doesn't change that. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/18 04:44 PM |
| 28 | How Not to Return to the Spotlight | Feminist whines that Aziz Ansari is back but, like other victims of the #MeToo witch hunt, he hasn't apologised. Why should he?The entire matter shows the evil, manipulative, supremacist misandry lurking in the hearts of too many women and the feminist society they have created. To summarise the wrong committed by Ansari: He wanted sex. This is a normal human impulse, and he approached it ethically. He did nothing wrong. Now to summarize the wrongs committed by "Grace": She showed no loyalty, ditching one man for the possibility of another. She wanted the other, Ansari, as an object: a success object, a status object, a… | /r/MensRights | 28/10/18 04:43 PM |
| 2 | NYT: Falsely-Accused Male Feminists Too Cowardly to Defend ThemselvesThis atrocious Google list shows how feminism has, one by one, chipped away a number of men's fundamental human rights: Accusations of criminality outside a court venue are an attempt to damage the accused without any requirement for evidence, corroboration, identification of the accuser, full and proper cross-examination, public trial, etc. MR should insist upon the opinion, however unpopular, that judging a criminal accusation outside a court (or associated agencies as police) - such as this M… | /r/MensRights | 15/10/18 05:49 AM |
| 3 | NYT: Falsely-Accused Male Feminists Too Cowardly to Defend ThemselvesMale feminists are even attempting to term "violence" an innocent's use of his right to legal process to counter defamation: “There’s a lot of anger out there about me,” Mr. Elliott said. “That’s the level of anger that could produce a malicious allegation — especially when it’s an anonymous list. I don’t like this guy. So I put his name on the list, throw in a TV dinner, watch ‘The Wire’ and forget about it.” That rage came pouring out on Thursday evening after news of the lawsuit broke, includ… | /r/MensRights | 15/10/18 04:20 AM |
| 7 | UVA Health Center Hiring ‘Masculinity Specialist’UVA is marinating in hatred of masculinity: The new hire must have a “demonstrated commitment to incorporating intersectionality of multiple identities (i.e. race, gender, class, etc.) as a core tenet of one's approach to violence prevention,” and also working knowledge of “toxic concepts of masculinity.” The article's author, Toni Airaksinen, is often on our side. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/18 12:33 AM |
| 2 | Women were never dehumanized: A brief explanation of history and the progression of feminismPlease check out the historical information I provided here: Refutation of "Women's Historical Oppression" : https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ Please note a below-the-line commenter's fascinating citation of Lucrezia Marinella. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/18 12:02 AM |
| 6 | Women were never dehumanized: A brief explanation of history and the progression of feminismI find them far less toxic than even mild feminism. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/18 12:00 AM |
| 4 | Women were never dehumanized: A brief explanation of history and the progression of feminismRefutation of "Women's Historical Oppression" : https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ Note the commenter's citation of Lucrezia Marinella. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/18 11:58 PM |
| 2 | A Terrible College Case Shows the High Cost of ‘Believe Women’Here: http://www.titleixforall.com/#section-legal-risk-management | /r/MensRights | 14/10/18 01:49 AM |
| 2 | The High Cost of "Believe Women"The capacity to edit titles would be useful; I'd change the focus to the court decision itself and Coney Barrett's opinions. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/18 01:43 AM |
| 2 | "The men's vote"Indeed, the author doesn't understand the statistician's definition of the term. But he's simply trying to say the difference from 50/50 is not dramatic. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 10:32 PM |
| 1 | So, women now have literal privilege in the law. This is beyond crazy.Why do you want more female representation? Why would qualified female board members necessarily behave any differently from qualified male board members? And shouldn't the criterion be the board candidate's experience, competence, and individual outlook, not their private parts? | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 06:06 PM |
| 2 | So, women now have literal privilege in the law. This is beyond crazy.NCFM has had some success invoking the California Unruh Act against private discrimination, but this is the state itself, so the dispute would probably end up in Federal court. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 06:01 PM |
| 4 | Karen Straughan explains the difference between how males are treated in traditionalist and feminist societiesFeminism wants to retain all traditional female advantages and remove any real or fabricated disadvantages. It also wants to elimate any traditional male advantages while retaining all male disadvantages. Equality is the last thing feminism wants. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 05:16 PM |
| 3 | It is now males, rather than females, who suffer the vast majority of institutional discriminationHundreds of baby boys die from this procedure every year. Not a reliable figure. In the third world, circumcision is not usually on babies. In the first world (North America), where neo-natal circumcision is common, the "hundreds" figure was obtained by assuming all unassigned male-over-female neonatal deaths to be due to circumcision. More careful studies have put the North American rate at about 20 deaths per year out of an incidence of about one million circumcisions annually. To preserve cre… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 04:34 PM |
| 2 | Only 2% of rape allegations are false....DEBUNKED!Any feminist who works with rape statistics will be aware of the commonly agreed range of 2% - 8% that most modern studies fit within. Absolute bullshit from a feminist liar. Most police, detectives, and prosecutors are well aware the false accusation rate is ~40%. But they'll destroy their careers if they say so openly. The 2% figure came to fame as a complete fabrication by Susan Brownmiller, under claim that a judge mentioned the figure. Karen Straughan writes: http://owningyourshit.blogspot.… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 04:28 PM |
| 5 | "The men's vote"I'm not sure I agree with everything in the article, but "the men's vote" is an excellent phrase to counter feminism's invocation of "the women's vote" to scare politicos into supporting a feminist agenda. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 11:15 AM |
| 11 | So, women now have literal privilege in the law. This is beyond crazy.We used to not be equal, with women on the losing side. That's a myth: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ | /r/MensRights | 11/10/18 09:23 AM |
| 15 | So, women now have literal privilege in the law. This is beyond crazy.I agree with most of your comment but disagree here: having more females in the workplace or even having more minorities actually does make a positive difference No, it doesn't make any difference. The studies claiming so mistake correlation for causation: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4seniz/potential_refutation_of_women_company_growth/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6sh60o/diversity_company_growth/ Also, Scandinavian countries requiring female board members have fo… | /r/MensRights | 11/10/18 09:09 AM |
| 13 | Jordan Peterson: Kavanaugh Should Step DownNonsense, on several grounds: The misandrists tried to use the same technique - unsupported allegations of sexual impropriety - on Thomas. It didn't work, and Thomas, though taciturn, has been engaged for decades not in a "shitstorm" but in writing quite a number of SC opinions. If Thomas won over the long term, so may Kavanaugh. Having tried the technique unsuccessfully twice now, any future use of the misandrist, unsupported sexual allegation technique will appear a pattern of crying wolf too … | /r/MensRights | 11/10/18 08:48 AM |
| 4 | I’m sick of it.OP, We've been there and understand. Don't get depressed. Men make happy lives for themselves despite society's misandry. Don't give up on women entirely. Just assume you'll have to slowly wade through a lot of muck to find a pearl. The more you circulate, the more likely to find the pearl. And, as others here have suggested, let your life revolve not around women but around friends, advancement, education, and enjoyable pursuits. Finding a pro-male therapist helps. So does discussion with other… | /r/MensRights | 11/10/18 08:15 AM |
| 21 | So, women now have literal privilege in the law. This is beyond crazy.This is likely a violation of Federal and state anti-discrimination law. The legal question is whether it might be allowed under diversity or affirmative action arguments, which a more conservative Supreme Court might now be ready to overturn. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/18 08:08 AM |
| 12 | Jordan Peterson: Kavanaugh Should Step DownPeterson has usually been calmly resistant to feminism, so it's disappointing that he fails to understand the danger of conceding to ambiguous or unsupported or outrightly false accusations. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/18 07:52 AM |
| 1 | False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies sayLet's take items one by one. Claims range from 2% to 90%. However, before the use of 1-in-5 and Koss methodology, the mode of indicators was ~40%. By mode, I mean not average but most recurring number. [The mode of the set {20,40,40,40,100} is 40, while its average is 48.]. Wiki used to have a good list of false accusation studies; its current list is incomplete. Eugene Kanin, sociology prof, did at least two studies. One showed ~41% false, another showed ~51% false. Feminist "men's issues exper… | /r/MensRights | 11/10/18 07:39 AM |
| 4 | False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies sayCertainly. I've work to do IRL but will come back here & give you refs. A good start is the appendix to the Taylor and Johnson book Until Proven Innocent. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/18 12:28 PM |
| 3 | False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies sayYes. There are multiple indicators. She waited decades to tell anyone. She tried to avoid making the claim in public under oath. She gave false witnesses who contradicted her account. Unlike most victims, she is vague about circumstances. She is strongly politically connected left. She has lied either in toto or about identification. False accusations deserve the same sentence as the crime. So, she belongs in prison for attempted rape. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/18 10:52 AM |
| 3 | False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say/u/lostapwbm is correct. The 2% figure is a lie fabricated by Brownmiller. It became a woozle. Brownmiller claimed a judge friend told her the figure. Wanna buy a bridge in the desert? | /r/MGTOW | 08/10/18 08:28 AM |
| 0 | The US Senate has voted to confirm President Donald Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court - BBC NewsYour .7 figure is fake. You seem to want conviction upon accusation. Oath on oath cases do not belong on the docket: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4a8xw3/potential_argument_against_hesaidshesaid/ | /r/MensRights | 08/10/18 08:22 AM |
| 3 | False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies sayMaking accusations of a crime anonymously or without police complaint should be automatically considered criminal defamation. It taints and destroys male lives without reasonable due process, which only true, full, and professional police and judicial procedure are qualified to provide. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/18 08:14 AM |
| 6 | False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies sayYou're a Mindless slave to the feminist-leftist narrative and thus an enemy of men's human rights. I'm no conservative but find Kavanaugh qualified and the criticism trumped-up (no pun intended) in order to preserve the tendency to legislate from the bench. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/18 08:10 AM |
| 3 | False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies sayFord lied, as did Anita Hill and Emma Sulkowicz. But none will be punished. Accusing an innocent of a crime anonymously or without proof should itself be considered criminal defamation, but it remains civil. Worse, public figures such as Kavanaugh and Thomas must prove malice and accuser's knowledge of falsity. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/18 08:08 AM |
| 2 | False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies saySnopes is not a neutral site. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/18 08:04 AM |
| 11 | False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies sayMRAs: Beware the definitions of terms in any article about false accusations! The much-cited FBI figure of 8% uses the misnomer "unfounded" to describe provably wrongful: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4w1z94/information_about_fbi_8_unfounded_accusation/ The FBI does not claim the remaining 92% true. The actual figure for unsubstantiated accusations (thus potentially false) is much higher. Kanin, Fairstein, McDowell, Silverman, FBI DNA all seem to indicate the actual false rate ~35… | /r/MensRights | 08/10/18 07:59 AM |
| 5 | The US Senate has voted to confirm President Donald Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court - BBC NewsShe's gaining a lot, and she's gaining it from her sexuality. Resembles prostitution, doesn't it? | /r/MensRights | 07/10/18 12:53 PM |
| 1 | The US Senate has voted to confirm President Donald Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court - BBC NewsThey won't learn and will use the sexism argument. | /r/MensRights | 07/10/18 12:51 PM |
| 1 | BANNING OF “THE RED PILL” AND MEN’S SPEECH IS ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONALGreat point. | /r/MensRights | 07/10/18 12:17 PM |
| 2 | The US Senate has voted to confirm President Donald Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court - BBC Newswe have a man who is now likely set against making things easier for rape victims to seek justice. You mean, a man now likely set against making things easier for false rape "victims" to destroy more innocent men's lives with perjured accusations? | /r/MensRights | 07/10/18 12:08 PM |
| 2 | BANNING OF “THE RED PILL” AND MEN’S SPEECH IS ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONALGoogle, YouTube, others may well face inquiry and have already been denounced by Trump. They have two problems: they're now public fora. intervening in content destroys their claim to be solely technical media such as traditional telecomm. | /r/MensRights | 07/10/18 06:54 AM |
| 1 | A study compares likely true rape stories with false rape stories and concludes significant differences. Many of the false story factors mirror what feminists insist is typical behavior for rape victims.Translation of your claim: There are no guidelines to false accusations. So, always believe the accuser, because even her inconsistencies mean she's a real victim. More bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 07/10/18 05:03 AM |
| 1 | A study compares likely true rape stories with false rape stories and concludes significant differences. Many of the false story factors mirror what feminists insist is typical behavior for rape victims.Sorry, you're bullshitting. I've seen no retraction by Stein and wouldn't believe one; he'd not have noted and published a comment out of thin air. He's eccentric, not stupid. When a men's rep used the figure on a public panel of which she was a part, she did not retract. Only later did she change her story. Jovanovic cited Fairstein in court filings opposing her prosecution directly. She failed to contest the citation before the court. The 50% figure is commonplace among defence attorneys. "Rel… | /r/MensRights | 07/10/18 04:59 AM |
| 1 | A study compares likely true rape stories with false rape stories and concludes significant differences. Many of the false story factors mirror what feminists insist is typical behavior for rape victims.Not alleged. Fairstein said it, in an interview by her friend Ben Stein published in Penthouse about 1987. Neither Stein nor Penthouse have rescinded the statement. One person here posted a facsimile. The NYT has variously cited the non-match rate of DNA samples submitted to the FBI by local law enforcement as 25% to 36%. That's why I mention 30% to 40% as the statistical "mode" of falsehood estimates. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/18 09:35 PM |
| 1 | On the Fallibility of Memory and the Importance of Evidence - Accept What A Victim Says, But Don't Trust Their MemoryAnother worthwhile study of the fallibility of memory: http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/483025/What-Jennifer-Saw/ https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/dna/ | /r/MensRights | 05/10/18 01:16 AM |
| 1 | Trump makes a statement in firm defence of "Innocent until proven guilty" | Whatever your politics, realise that it's very important for men that the president is willing to stand up for our legal rights in this way.Innocent until proved guilty is a principal going far beyond criminal issues, a bedrock of civilisation. And he has saved uni men from liability to destruction at a woman's whim. You've let emotion and partisanship override MR facts. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 05:50 AM |
| 2 | Trump makes a statement in firm defence of "Innocent until proven guilty" | Whatever your politics, realise that it's very important for men that the president is willing to stand up for our legal rights in this way./u/tmone is right. MRAs should align themselves only temporarily with either side, but consistently for the past half century it is the right opposing feminism and the left pushing misandrist extremes. The only obvious exception is the late Karen DeCrow, who occasionally insisted men entitled to equality. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 05:47 AM |
| 0 | Trump makes a statement in firm defence of "Innocent until proven guilty" | Whatever your politics, realise that it's very important for men that the president is willing to stand up for our legal rights in this way.Liar. One case of the CP5 is not a history of supporting unproven allegations. Trump, warts and all, has done more for men than the past several administrations. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 05:43 AM |
| 0 | Trump makes a statement in firm defence of "Innocent until proven guilty" | Whatever your politics, realise that it's very important for men that the president is willing to stand up for our legal rights in this way.Yes, you're making that up. The five were not clearly guilty but not clearly innocent. And Trump's advert called generically for more severity for violent crimes, including death penalty, as a systematic standard to be applied in the law to convicted murderous criminals; race didn't enter into it. And the charges were not just rape, but included grievous permanent brain injury. In other words your presentation is a severe distortion of the truth. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 05:40 AM |
| 2 | Trump makes a statement in firm defence of "Innocent until proven guilty" | Whatever your politics, realise that it's very important for men that the president is willing to stand up for our legal rights in this way./u/tmone obviously means who rescinded the Dear Colleague letter (Trump administration) and who created it (Obama administration). | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 05:34 AM |
| 1 | A study compares likely true rape stories with false rape stories and concludes significant differences. Many of the false story factors mirror what feminists insist is typical behavior for rape victims.That's why I maintain accusations which are merely oath-on-oath (he-said-she said), anonymous, or circumventing law enforcement, are so inherently defective and iffy, that they should be automatically null. In more detail: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4a8xw3/potential_argument_against_hesaidshesaid/ | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 03:48 AM |
| 1 | A study compares likely true rape stories with false rape stories and concludes significant differences. Many of the false story factors mirror what feminists insist is typical behavior for rape victims.Not just silly young girls, but also divorcees, breakups, virtually any woman with a grudge. NYC prosecutor Fairstein had a long article in the NYT (about 1995?) covering the many reasons for false reports she'd encountered in handling thousands of cases. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 03:31 AM |
| 2 | A study compares likely true rape stories with false rape stories and concludes significant differences. Many of the false story factors mirror what feminists insist is typical behavior for rape victims.See my responses elsewhere in this thread. I've seen original reports, voluminous, exact, and detailed. But more than 25 years have intervened. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 03:29 AM |
| 1 | A study compares likely true rape stories with false rape stories and concludes significant differences. Many of the false story factors mirror what feminists insist is typical behavior for rape victims.The problem is not the state of knowledge of cops and judges. It is the pressure upon them to err for the accuser and to rarely punish blatantly false accusations. A former Colorado prosecutor by the name of Silverman could allow himself to publicly estimate the falsehood rate at 35% to 45% only after he left the position. NYC feminist prosecutor Fairstein admitted 50% but then tried to stuff the cat back into the bag. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 03:20 AM |
| 1 | A study compares likely true rape stories with false rape stories and concludes significant differences. Many of the false story factors mirror what feminists insist is typical behavior for rape victims.Ignore this fellow /u/antilopes, who obviously hasn't seen the originals so decides to nitpick the summaries. Interested MRAs will find it worth the effort to find the originals, either from the USAF (FOIA backlog 1 year) or from men's orgs extant at the time. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 03:18 AM |
| 1 | A study compares likely true rape stories with false rape stories and concludes significant differences. Many of the false story factors mirror what feminists insist is typical behavior for rape victims.Difficult to find originals. He worked for the US Air Force Office of Special Investigations and compiled his reports over a number of years, over several topics: provably false reports, likely false reports, criteria to distinguish likely true from likely false, etc. He was forced to stop his work by politically-correct military superiors under pressure from Congressbeotch Schroeder. Copies of his work have gradually disappeared, either through time or through feminist pressure on the military.… | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 02:53 AM |
| 1 | A study compares likely true rape stories with false rape stories and concludes significant differences. Many of the false story factors mirror what feminists insist is typical behavior for rape victims.This fellow /u/antelopes is lying through his teeth. An entire earlier generation of MRAs from a number of organisations reviewed his work as well as his initial USAF staffers, including statisticians. His work is often cited by MRAs but in summary, not because of defects but because the increasingly PC military ceded to threats from Congress to squash the research. They may or may not have kept copies, depending upon the demands of Schroeder and the degree of PC military fear of Congress. At th… | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 02:50 AM |
| 1 | Trump makes a statement in firm defence of "Innocent until proven guilty" | Whatever your politics, realise that it's very important for men that the president is willing to stand up for our legal rights in this way.estimated 6% of reports were either false or probably false. Blatant false stats. The mode of independent studies, as Kanin or McDowell, is ~40% false reports. Generally, the lower numbers (<10%) result from ambiguous definitions deliberately confusing the provably false rate with the probably false and unsubstantiated rates. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/18 10:41 AM |
| 1 | Trump makes a statement in firm defence of "Innocent until proven guilty" | Whatever your politics, realise that it's very important for men that the president is willing to stand up for our legal rights in this way.That's a false representation of DoJ stats. Particularly, provably false reports are only a small portion of unsubstantiated reports, which cannot simply be assumed true. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/18 10:39 AM |
| 0 | Trump makes a statement in firm defence of "Innocent until proven guilty" | Whatever your politics, realise that it's very important for men that the president is willing to stand up for our legal rights in this way.Balderdash. Several here have now urged you to read the original advert rather than the common misrepresentations. Do your homework before you propagate the misrepresentations. Your summaries are a lie. As for race, Trump's unemployment rate drop and efforts to bring jobs back may have done more for African-Americans than any administration since Johnson's. As I've said elsewhere, I'm neither liberal nor conservative - just a pro-male realist. The left is horrendous for men generally and even fo… | /r/MensRights | 03/10/18 10:20 AM |
| 1 | Georgetown Prof Says White GOP Should Be Castrated & Fed to SwineYou're perfectly welcome to continue to invest religious fervor into the loony-left narrative, but you should understand it's not compatible with Men's Rights. I made an earlier post praising pro-male female authors. Almost all were conservatives (though my criterion was MR, not conservativism). Similarly, most of the females objecting to guilt by accusation, are conservative. My loyalty is to MR, not conservativism nor liberalism. But reality indicates Trump and his EdSec DeVos have done more f… | /r/MensRights | 03/10/18 10:09 AM |
| 0 | Trump makes a statement in firm defence of "Innocent until proven guilty" | Whatever your politics, realise that it's very important for men that the president is willing to stand up for our legal rights in this way.You're making a common error. Stories about stories (or about adverts or court cases) are often glosses of glosses with inaccurate summaries and headlines for partisan or sensationalist purposes; controversy and sensationalism sell newspapers. In this matter in particular, the glosses do not accurately describe the advert. Edit: Learn to read criticallly. Your "huge story" turns out to be entirely smoke and mirrors when examined closely. The advert focused on violent crime, not on the CP5. Other… | /r/MensRights | 03/10/18 09:54 AM |
| 2 | Trump makes a statement in firm defence of "Innocent until proven guilty" | Whatever your politics, realise that it's very important for men that the president is willing to stand up for our legal rights in this way.That's wise. I saw a reproduction of the advert in question (possibly on the NYT site). The headline wanted to bring back the death penalty; the text was entirely a lament that the city had degenerated to an unacceptable level of violent crime, and that the city should do something and should give law enforcement tools to combat violence, including the death penalty for murder. Its references to the "Central Park Five" were indirect references to youth crime and not racial. That same day, in Cen… | /r/MensRights | 03/10/18 09:51 AM |
| 2 | Trump makes a statement in firm defence of "Innocent until proven guilty" | Whatever your politics, realise that it's very important for men that the president is willing to stand up for our legal rights in this way./u/LateralIncisor is accurate. Particularly, Trump's NYT advert focused on violent crime, not on the CP5 directly as the headlines imply. Further, a single case is much too small a sample to prove racial bias on Trump's part. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/18 09:50 AM |
| 12 | A study compares likely true rape stories with false rape stories and concludes significant differences. Many of the false story factors mirror what feminists insist is typical behavior for rape victims.Excellent - analogous to the suppressed work of USAF's McDowell. Thanks. http://www.mediaradar.org/mcdowell_kanin_credible.php | /r/MensRights | 03/10/18 09:35 AM |
| 0 | I'm ruining my relationship with my aunt by discussing false allegations.First-hand accounts often see one's own (real or exaggerated) problems but not others'. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/18 10:23 AM |
| 2 | Georgetown Prof Says White GOP Should Be Castrated & Fed to SwineBeing a claimed victim of sexual assault now seems to justify any and all adult Misbehaviour. Women's views of Kavanaugh seem mostly to follow party not gender. In fact, it is reassuring that a substantial number of women, mostly conservative, oppose guilt by accusation. The underlying dispute is about abortion (and other claimed judicial overreach) not impeachment or prosecution. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/18 10:16 AM |
| 2 | Georgetown Prof Says White GOP Should Be Castrated & Fed to SwineMs Fair has further problems: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/german-police-sue-nazi-american-tourist-calling-hitler-legal-action-frankfurt-airport-a8181366.html | /r/MensRights | 02/10/18 10:11 AM |
| 0 | I'm ruining my relationship with my aunt by discussing false allegations.No, dirty, strenuous, and dangerous work is not a choice and not necessarily well-rewarded. Read Farrell's material concerning glass-cellar jobs. And read the references given here, showing men have always had it worse: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ | /r/MensRights | 02/10/18 04:07 AM |
| 4 | Why men should not trust womenWhen the majority say that women don't make false accusations then a smart man will do his best to avoid all women rather than risk being destroyed by one false accusation that the community will blindly accept. This! | /r/MensRights | 02/10/18 04:00 AM |
| 4 | Why men should not trust womenYes, it should, unless you can propose a reliable method of distinguishing the honest ones from the dishonest ones, who can ruin your life at whim. On the contrary, it would seem reasonable and even wise to be wary or distrustful of specific women until the individual's behaviour warrants otherwise. It's not much different from the wise caution and wariness with which an African-American would approach an individual white in 1900 - cautious and wary until the individual's behaviour warrants trus… | /r/MensRights | 02/10/18 03:38 AM |
| 0 | I'm ruining my relationship with my aunt by discussing false allegations.The wall is not one you built by discussing men's issues. It is one she built by refusing to acknowledge your humanity and your issues. So the only way you can remove the wall is by conceding to her that you're subhuman. Do you really want to do that? | /r/MensRights | 02/10/18 03:24 AM |
| 1 | I'm ruining my relationship with my aunt by discussing false allegations.being a woman in the workplace definitely sucked more than being a man in the workplace in the 1960s Not true. Then, as now, men had the most dirty, dangerous, strenuous, soul- and body-destroying jobs, not infrequently going home in a box: https://www.stripes.com/2.2035/for-those-who-prepared-vietnam-s-fallen-a-lasting-dread-1.309701 | /r/MensRights | 02/10/18 03:21 AM |
| 1 | 5 Signs You’re In The Midst Of A Moral Panic | Putting #MeToo in a historical context.Notice also that feminism is never satisfied; it will create one panic after another in its quest for power. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/18 12:40 PM |
| 4 | Christine Fair Expresses Her Feelings Towards MenThis is a uni prof? Why isn't she kicked out for her violent hate speech? | /r/MensRights | 01/10/18 07:10 AM |
| 3 | UK: 76000 men in prison and 4000 women. They concentrate on helping female offenders. Now they are not going to jail women at all unless it is a very serious crime."Prison is a negative experience for everyone, but it is particularly distressing for women," Surely, you've seen the headline, World to End; Women, Minorities Hardest Hit. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 09:38 AM |
| 1 | I don't see anyone saying it, so I'm going to. I don't give a damn of your political beliefs, but the Kavanaugh fiasco should be concerning to everyone here.Why All Oath-on-Oath Proceedings (Ford-Kavanaugh) Are Defective: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9jlab3/why_all_oathonoath_proceedings_fordkavanaugh_are/ | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 06:47 AM |
| 1 | Feminism is the insane belief that men, throughout history, have sought to oppress their own mothers and daugthersRefutation of "Women's Historical Oppression": https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3a01gq/refutation_of_womens_historical_oppression/ | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 06:45 AM |
| 1 | UK: 76000 men in prison and 4000 women. They concentrate on helping female offenders. Now they are not going to jail women at all unless it is a very serious crime.At the height of the 2016 Presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton published an op-ed in USA Today arguing women should not be sent to prison. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 05:54 AM |
| 15 | Isn't going around saying someone raped you without evidence Slander?Blasey Ford is indeed committing defamation. However, to successfully sue her, Kavanaugh would have to overcome a number of issues: The US law contains a public figure exception; public figures such as Kavanaugh have not only to prove the speech/writing false and defamatory, they have also to prove the respondent knew the material false and proceeded in malice. That's a very high bar. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_figure Suing the accuser keeps the phrase "alleged rapist Kavanaugh" in the… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 05:48 AM |
| 27 | Many who have faced false rape charges would disagree...Arguments why oath-on oath (that is, accusation-only) cases should not even be given a hearing: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4a8xw3/potential_argument_against_hesaidshesaid/ | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 05:40 AM |
| -7 | Norwegian hospitals refuse to assist in circumcisionsI see intactivists remain ensconced in their own fantasies. Even in jurisdictions (such as Australia) which ban circumcision in all public hospitals (thus far more than two), it remains legal when done privately by a trained practitioner. The chances of any major country enacting an outright ban are nil, due not only to the numbers of religious practitioners (principally Muslim) but also to entrenched custom (such as the 90% circumcision rate in the Philippines). Rather than living in a fantasy … | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 05:37 AM |
| 3 | Ammo Grrrll: "I think the #MeToo “Movement” is the most dangerous movement since the KKK"Excellent article. Thanks! | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 05:15 AM |
| 1 | InterestingI'd be wary of CDC studies and figures; they've produced a 1-in-5 study and are very politically correct. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 04:51 AM |
| 2 | InterestingStraus has been diligently proving symmetry for 30 years: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1077801206293335 | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 04:48 AM |
| 1 | InterestingI still wonder where she gets those statistics (it seems statistics would only exist for what's been reported). Check out the Fiebert meta-study: https://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 04:41 AM |
| 8 | Ammo Grrrll: "I think the #MeToo “Movement” is the most dangerous movement since the KKK"You're thinking the way feminism has trained you. If feminist society can compare rape to murder (and often impose longer sentences for rape than for murder), then MR is justified in comparing false allegations of rape to murder as well. And we've just seen Blasey Ford compare groping to attempted murder. MR needs to respond in kind. As for your quibble about Dear Colleague and MeToo, you fail to understand that they're both symptoms of the same problem: In one way or another, for solid relation… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 02:45 AM |
| 1 | Ammo Grrrll: "I think the #MeToo “Movement” is the most dangerous movement since the KKK"Not really. The KKK destroyed the lives of an estimated 10.000 innocent (black) males. #MeToo and its Puritanical antecedents have or will destroy the lives of many more. Edit: The author's analogy holds in another way: One of the KKK's purposes was obviously to use mob intimidation to terrorise the mass of African-Americans, with the objective of keeping them subordinate and docile. One of the MeToo's purposes is obviously to use social-media-propagated mob intimidation to terrorise the mass of… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/18 08:21 PM |
| 1 | "But my fellow Republican senators and I agree that any allegation of this nature must be looked into as thoroughly as possible, no matter who is involved and *no matter how many years have passed*"The misandrists have a new scam to circumvent the statute of limitations when it exists: 2018: Female claims "Male X raped me in 1949." 1949 may be well beyond the statute of limitations. 2018: Male X states publicly, "That's false." 2018: Female sues male X for defamation, on the basis of his "current" 2018 statement. I presume this scam to be the reason for the comment by /u/Sasha_ on this thread, that men should not deny allegations. That's technically correct but is then one more human right… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/18 07:47 PM |
| 4 | "But my fellow Republican senators and I agree that any allegation of this nature must be looked into as thoroughly as possible, no matter who is involved and *no matter how many years have passed*"The reason for a statute of limitations for any crime, is that time obliterates exculpatory evidence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_limitations#Purpose Although traditionally war crimes and murder have had no statute of limitations, the hype surrounding child molestation, Cosby, MeToo, etc, has been used as a pretext for eliminating the statute of limitations for sexual offences as well, in some jurisdictions. Say the words "feminism" or "sex" and Western society throws hundreds or th… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/18 07:00 PM |
| 1 | Why All Oath-on-Oath Proceedings (Ford-Kavanaugh) Are Defectivehttps://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2c44/14cde6b6a011e9f4910e6389d658278e3a7a.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491274 The immediate focus is in-group preference, but there is an implication that even men favour women - that is, white knighting is real. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/18 01:20 PM |
| 8 | I feel like tonight is the true beginning of the mens rights movement.Nonsense. An unintentional typo, or your auto-correction, altered your statement in a humourous way. We understand both your intent ("coached") and the humour. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/18 08:25 AM |
| 1 | Anyone else find it a little odd that a pharmacy would put the health of half of its customers "first" above the other half's?It's very feasible to reach Marketing and have the campaign modified or stopped. I've done it more than once. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/18 07:52 AM |
| 8 | I feel like tonight is the true beginning of the mens rights movement.Brett was couched by Trump? An intimate relationship? Perish the thought! 😜 | /r/MensRights | 28/09/18 07:41 AM |
| 2 | Menslib on false rape accusationsMy analysis of the infamous FBI 8% unfounded claim: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4w1z94/information_about_fbi_8_unfounded_accusation/ The 2% lie is a woozle originating with Susan Brownmiller, who just made up the number or took it from the percentage of other types of crimes deemed false. Decades later, Brownmiller finally gave an ostensible source; a judge friend told her the 2% figure. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/18 09:57 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter