TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Meyright Archive

View 40 posts and 1,630 comments by Meyright on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2477

Social IssuesMeyright/r/MensRights21/08/18 12:45 PM
1672

HumourMeyright/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:22 PM
1583

Edu./Occu.Meyright/r/MensRights14/03/18 12:31 PM
358

FeminismMeyright/r/MensRights07/04/17 11:09 AM
214

Social IssuesMeyright/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:09 PM
184

Anti-MRMMeyright/r/MensRights17/01/19 10:50 AM
173

Activism/SupportMeyright/r/MensRights05/04/18 06:24 PM
167

Social IssuesMeyright/r/MensRights27/03/18 06:39 PM
144

Activism/SupportMeyright/r/MensRights02/03/18 11:14 AM
144

Edu./Occu.Meyright/r/MensRights26/04/17 08:19 AM
120

False AccusationMeyright/r/MensRights09/07/17 04:31 PM
115

Social IssuesMeyright/r/MensRights08/04/17 10:31 AM
93

Social IssuesMeyright/r/MensRights23/06/17 09:07 AM
75

GeneralMeyright/r/MensRights08/03/18 08:55 AM
65

Meyright/r/MensRights23/02/17 09:20 PM
63

Edu./Occu.Meyright/r/MensRights26/02/18 03:30 PM
56

Meyright/r/MensRights09/04/17 09:07 AM
54

Anti-MRMMeyright/r/MensRights25/09/18 12:59 PM
50

Social IssuesMeyright/r/MensRights14/04/17 06:48 PM
49

Meyright/r/MensRights30/01/17 09:08 PM
46

Social IssuesMeyright/r/MensRights27/04/18 08:48 AM
45

Anti-MRMMeyright/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:37 PM
43

Meyright/r/MensRights03/04/17 03:08 PM
42

Social IssuesMeyright/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:40 PM
39

Social IssuesMeyright/r/MensRights26/09/18 06:48 PM
34

Meyright/r/MensRights28/06/17 12:07 PM
33

FeminismMeyright/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:46 AM
31

Activism/SupportMeyright/r/MensRights12/03/18 10:21 AM
18

Meyright/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:59 PM
18

FeminismMeyright/r/MensRights26/02/18 07:21 PM
14

Meyright/r/MensRights15/01/17 11:48 AM
14

FeminismMeyright/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:15 AM
13

Meyright/r/MensRights25/01/17 07:26 PM
10

GeneralMeyright/r/MensRights05/07/18 01:09 PM
9

Meyright/r/MensRights06/04/17 09:23 AM
9

GeneralMeyright/r/MensRights22/05/17 10:57 AM
9

Social IssuesMeyright/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:24 AM
8

GeneralMeyright/r/MensRights26/01/18 07:52 PM
6

Social IssuesMeyright/r/MensRights13/03/18 01:12 PM
1

Meyright/r/MensRights02/03/18 11:10 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,630 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Isn't that policy already in place in Canada?
/r/MensRights20/01/19 11:00 AM
11

Mark my words, they will somehow find a way and advocate for a solution so that only men have to pay.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 06:34 PM
3

Saved this post for later. One recommendation though. Don't start with a video hosting Jordan Peterson, they will outright dismiss it.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 03:30 PM
1

Never listen to what women people say, watch what they do FTFY. There is too much generalization in this thread that I need to say something. I urge you all to stop writing things like "women like this" or "women say that" etc. With just one magic word in front of the word "women", everything you say suddenly becomes more valid. And the magical word is "most". It's "most women". There are always exceptions no matter what you say. You know this when you write it, I know that you probably know thi…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 03:19 PM
2

There are so many other factors not included in 3% which could still deliver perfect reasonable explanations for this number. Exactly like with the rest of the wage gap.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 02:35 PM
7

I belong to the camp of deconstructing gender roles, as well You don't need to deconstruct gender roles to behave like what you described here: How about ALL people treat others with respect? How about regardless of what your appearance may be having accountability for your actions? Everyone can be a monster if they chose to, regardless of what private parts they possess gender roles they "play" or private parts they possess.. FTFY. Everyone can be a monster, even if we deconstructed all the gen…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 03:40 PM
3

Couldn't have said it better. Highlight the hypocrisy but "eye for an eye" will leave the world blind.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 11:36 AM
9

Not only that, but 51% of the replies there have been removed by the moderators: https://www.removeddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/aekl9g/helpi_think_my_cousins_flirting_with_the_altright/ It's 42% for the gilette thread over there: https://www.removeddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/afyu3p/gillette_tackles_metoo_toxic_masculinity_in_new/ r/menslib is a delusional feminist trojan horse Edit: I have skimmed over some comments, and they're deleting people for respectfully disagreeing with the approved narra…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:54 AM
4

and we're seeing that start to happen. How?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:43 AM
1

It happens sometimes coming from men who have been burned by women or let down by feminism. They normally get downvoted if it's obvious. If you see someone making generalizations about women call them out on it or make them aware of the fact that it's never all women. They are not representative of this sub.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 10:29 AM
13

Most men don't "slave away" because of women, but because of their children or family. The real problem is not the "slaving away" but the easy possibility for every woman to either take those things away or to push him into it. Women are enabled and rewarded by the state to do so. That does not mean that every woman does that or even the majority, but that every woman has the possibility to do so. This needs to change.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 09:52 PM
9

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/000/975/223/4bc.jpg
/r/MensRights07/01/19 09:25 AM
-1

When women complain about a pay gap or under representation in certain fields, but ignore gender disparities in oil fields or trash collecting, then bringing this up is just a counter argument. It is not only brought up as a counter argument but as an argument in and of itself. And he is rightfully calling this out. I've seen this with other arguments. "We" are more and more not calling out the feminist double standard of an argument, but the perceived sexism against men.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 05:29 PM
1

Gender discrimination is never ok. He is not arguing against that. He is making one valid argument. Namely the work place death rate is NOT due to gender discrimination but, just like the wage gap, due to individual choice of men to work in more dangerous jobs. He is rightfully calling it out. He imho doesn't have such a strong case with his other points though.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 05:26 PM
-1

Pick your battles, he is not your enemy. What you are asking has nothing to do with his argument. It's important to call out bullshit in your own movement. Otherwise you end up like feminism. Don't you see that?
/r/MensRights05/01/19 02:24 PM
2

I agree with you in general, but the "incarceration rate" doesn't fit your description and neither does the homelessness rate. The incarceration rate is a function of sexism: https://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightslinks/comments/20f1b5/legalpaper_estimating_gender_disparities_in/ And homelessness is probably most often not a function of individual choice. You can't blame a homeless man for his choices in the same way you can blame a man choosing a job. Or can you? You still have a point. Workplace d…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 02:19 PM
2

Yes, it would be exactly the same mindset
/r/MensRights05/01/19 10:35 AM
4

I would argue in this case it is men being seen as a threat and not necessarily as disposable.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 10:20 AM
15

What is it with people coming up here nowadays celebrating movies which portray male lead characters as being weak and showing emotions? Is this what mra's ask for? I would argue no, it's what feminists have asked for. Weakness is NOT a virtue and not an end in itself. Men not showing emotions isn't the problem. The problem is some women and men or society not giving a fuck about men who show emotions and dismissing them as being weak. Unfortunately there are biological, evolutionary reasons for…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 10:11 AM
1

Red pill theory would argue a female incel is someone who can't get men to commit to a relationship but is still able to get sex. A male incel is simply someone who can't get either
/r/MensRights01/01/19 04:59 PM
8

What the fuck is a feminist lookout?
/r/MensRights01/01/19 04:54 PM
4

No don't do that. If you want to defend yourself do so in a reasonable manner or you will get into trouble. In this case, push her and/or her hand away and tell her to stay away.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 04:39 PM
3

Funny because that's exactly how r/theredpill advocates to treat your partner, like a child
/r/MensRights01/01/19 01:13 PM
2

We're all in the same boat with you. We all have the same feelings. It IS frustrating and yes the world IS an unfair place. It's probably especially discouraging when you're in school. But that all doesn't matter. It doesn't matter at all. Because you will succeed nevertheless. Men have always succeeded despite the odds. I mean encouragement is nice, but you don't need anyone to give you permission to be successful in life, no matter how you define this for yourself. Giving up is exactly what a …
/r/MensRights01/01/19 01:10 PM
6

But what makes him so endearing is the fact that the movie isn't afraid to show that even strong men can get scared. There's a scene where Aquaman talks about how he was raised to never show weakness and he's not sure how to proceed because of that. But that is an argument straight out of the feminist playbook. That's their only talking point when it comes to men. "Men suffer through patriarchy because they can't show their emotions" which is completely condescending and not even the problem to …
/r/MensRights31/12/18 01:56 PM
-3

I think it's more innate than it is conditioning from society
/r/MensRights28/12/18 08:48 PM
3

Sue. Gather any documentation you may have and go to a lawyer. Came here to say this. If the evidence is solid enough this could be your meal ticket for the next decade. On the case of the quote mining accusation. Good for you to point that out, but we have to take what people say on a face value and deal with it individually. Otherwise you end up believing nothing. The right way is to call people out who answer and instigate illegal action.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 06:05 PM
4

But it's wrong. In young boys the foreskin is fused to the glans and it's often misdiagnosed as phimosis by incompetent doctors. Read what u/93re2 has written about it too
/r/MensRights14/12/18 06:43 PM
1

He was more wrong dipshit You are truly a compassionate human being and the epitome of moral judgement
/r/MensRights11/12/18 01:51 PM
2

It is almost never justified to hit someone So why don't you call her out on it too?
/r/MensRights11/12/18 12:38 PM
8

First, nobody is defending his actions, he is wrong for hitting her. The issue is, she is an abuser too but nobody cares because she is a woman, a pregnant one which makes it a national tragedy. Look, this is a really classical domestic violence situation. THIS is what happens when people talk about reciprocal domestic violence and what Erin Pizzey describes in her speeches. The woman wants something from the man. She doesn't get it, so she decides to get his attention by getting in his face. Sh…
/r/MensRights11/12/18 12:09 AM
10

They can't be serious. Do they even listen to themselves? Absolving women from the consequences of doing a crime? This world is going crazy. Isn't that Piers Morgan who was celebrated here for standing up for men? WTF???
/r/MensRights24/11/18 03:44 PM
2

First thanks for staying constructive in your argument. English is not my first language, so be aware of some inaccuracies. You should be aware to the fact and open your mind to the possibility that your field of study has been corrupted by an extreme political ideology: And there is recent evidence for that: https://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/. Social constructivism and deconstructing gender is part of the goal of this ideology. My a…
/r/MensRights24/11/18 12:13 PM
2

Men and women build our civilizations together
/r/MensRights23/11/18 03:15 PM
2

1.) Prohibition on sex work creates extreme artificial scarcity in the sex/dating market, which increases the price of sex and decreases the relative value of men, who become even more disposable in the sex/dating market and by extension every other facet of human life. Many european countries have legal prostitution, but the scarcity in the sex/dating market still exists. Maybe it flattens the curve a bit but not noticeably. And maybe it is good for men who are not able to find a woman. There i…
/r/MensRights23/11/18 03:10 PM
1

Have you tried listening to what Peterson has to say about Marxism? No really try to really listen
/r/MensRights23/11/18 01:00 PM
5

Instant gratification always just one click away
/r/MensRights23/11/18 12:44 PM
1

I'm not sorry for you. This thread is ten days old, nobody besides us is reading this. We are just two people interested in mens rights. I just tried to explain to you how the german system works. There is no need for snarky comments. I understand you're angry, but please let it out on something else. I am not your enemy. Have a nice weekend and greetings from germany.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 12:39 PM
8

Is your post feminist post modern satire? there are no biologically determined behavioral tendencies that are specific to men There is MASSIVE scientific evidence for the fact that men and women show biological tendencies which express through behavior. Including the largest study ever done on sex differences from the Cambridge University: https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/9wo82u/scientists_at_cambridge_have_completed_the_worlds/ Masculinity and femininity are a function of social roles,…
/r/MensRights23/11/18 12:30 PM
1

Yes, that's how the retirement system in germany works. Each young generation pays the retirement for the older one. It currently coming into question because of the fertility crisis.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 02:26 PM
-1

I get why young men are hesitant to get married and become fathers these days. But we can have both, we can change custody and marriage laws AND let childless people in Germany pay more taxes because having no kids is detrimental for the society and pensions for all people.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 11:49 AM
2

You have to view this through the lens of germanys fertility crisis, demographic changes and how the pension and retirement system is build up. I have to agree with him on that actually. Families should benefit more. Can you explain me the mens rights angle with this?
/r/MensRights12/11/18 11:12 AM
7

According to the report, in 96 per cent of cases, the parents who apply to court for “access” to their children are men, with the average case taking between six months and two years to complete. In just under half of these cases, dads will win the right to have their children stay with them overnight, with the most common arrangement being every other weekend. Just under a quarter will be restricted to seeing their children in the daytime and the remaining quarter will be given little or no opp…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 10:58 AM
3

http://www.mrarchivist.com
/r/MensRights10/11/18 09:10 AM
3

And now you're guilty of posting in this community too. See, your argument is stupid.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 06:27 PM
1

The best response you can give those people is something along the lines of "so what?" and being proud to stand up for equal rights. I actually got my first reddit gold in response to someone using this as an argument in the heavy left leaning (said by mods) german main sub r/de: https://np.reddit.com/r/de/comments/9qccis/m%C3%A4nner_beim_gr%C3%BCnenparteitag_kurzzeitig/e88cmdb/ It can be translated to: Thank you for mentioning it, I didn't want to write it myself because I find it strange to ad…
/r/MensRights08/11/18 06:26 PM
5

The post is disingenuous, you should think about flagging it as "misleading" or something
/r/MensRights03/11/18 01:13 PM
9

That's objectively wrong
/r/MensRights02/11/18 05:03 PM
2

I believe that if I were to take random sampling of viewpoints belonging to self proclaimed feminists, the ratio of radical statements and claims to rational ones would be substantially less than hecklers would lead us to believe. However, I suppose it would be naive of me to also believe that a feminist could also be an egalitarian in (current year). The radicals are duping normal people into associating with them. But Karen Straughan says it best in an answer to the statement "these are not th…
/r/MensRights01/11/18 12:58 PM
1

Modern feminism stands in the way of men gaining equal rights in many places, so I have to disagree. But whats important to consider by saying that is Feminism =/= women mens rights =/= anti women mens rights =/= anti women's rights
/r/MensRights31/10/18 05:03 PM
3

"Office of Equity and Diversity" - When you can guess the verdict by the name of the institution
/r/MensRights30/10/18 05:46 PM
3

Second, SJ is among the least of the show's problems! I have to disagree. I was so put of by the SJ spin already in the first episode, that I had to turn it of.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 05:44 PM
3

Awesome idea. Own your weaknesses and make them your strength!
/r/MensRights30/10/18 05:07 PM
3

He literally said in the video that he doesn't consider himself a conservative. Even if he was tradcon, I don't see how that conflicts with him being a red pill.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 12:45 PM
4

Jordan Peterson is a living red pill
/r/MensRights29/10/18 11:55 AM
15

It's not the first nor will it be the last series from Netflix which panders to the millennial SJW agenda. There is a reason Netflix didn't accept Cassie Jaye's "The Red Pill" Movie on their platform.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 09:02 AM
5

In the first episode they're talking about a club to end patriarchy!
/r/MensRights29/10/18 08:56 AM
2

Is dissent not allowed in this subreddit? You're doing it again. That is not what I said. Read again what I said. If you want to discuss something, make sure you understand the position the other holds first before insulting, arguing against him. Dissent being allowed means your opinion isn't free from dissent itself.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 02:42 PM
3

You should read the text again Nowadays, woman have the same right as men in most countries. Don't get me wrong, I think this is totally normal and i encourage it. There is no reason why woman should not drive a car, should not have the right to vote, should not have a career, or should always be 'in service' of their men. Please note that woman have obtained these rights over the span of just a couple of decades. Even in countries we do not perceive as the 'free world'. That's just amazing. We,…
/r/MensRights28/10/18 12:52 PM
2

Sure
/r/MensRights28/10/18 12:43 PM
2

You're preaching to the choir. In short Men and women evolved to be different (complementary) This still has repercussion today, even though it wouldn't be necessary anymore in our society But it should not stand in the way of equal rights, which we already implemented One consequence though is that women and men are not equally represented in certain fields Evolution (or technology) will overcome this difference or will make it obsolet Until then it's unfair to blame men Is that broughtly corre…
/r/MensRights28/10/18 12:40 PM
8

This is very often the argument They gaslight you that men don't get custody because they don't want to, because most custody cases get solved outside of court (because men and their lawyer know they won't get it). They'll tell you in the face, that men don't contribute to the well being of the family in the same way as women when men go out to work. And they use that as a reason, that men shouldn't get custody. On every level, they diminish the part a man plays in the family.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 09:50 PM
1

Be part of the part that calls shit like this out!
/r/MensRights26/10/18 10:43 AM
20

Apply Get rejected Sue Profit
/r/MensRights25/10/18 07:53 PM
4

There is a huge dark figure for men attempting suicide. The assumption that women attempt suicide more often, stems from the way in which they got to these numbers. They only counted people getting hospitalized for this statistic. And since men are more likely to choose more violent methods to kill themselves, it leads to less men getting hospitalized for a failed attempt. Men who put a gun to their head, or a noose around their neck but get second thoughts at the last moment and don't pull the …
/r/MensRights24/10/18 11:39 PM
2

When you find it, post it in /r/mensrightslinks and or r/mrref Considering its not already in there
/r/MensRights21/10/18 06:42 PM
7

So she's promoting WGTOW? I don't see a problem with that as long as she isn't harming anyone. She is voting with her wallet for what she believes in, which is ok for me. Though I think it's stupid to judge content based on the genitals of the creator She is not arguing for less freedom for anybody, but using her own freedom to do what she likes.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 09:34 AM
1

While men kill much more often, with a percentage ranging from somewhere around 80% up to 90%, it's seems noteworthy to me that both men and women kill men more often (study form Sweden) than women. Men account for around 60-90% of murder victims (depending on the country). Society only cares about the victims when they are women and only about the perpetrators when they're male. A murder with a female victim is even around 60% more likely to result in a death sentence (32% to 47%), (related gra…
/r/MensRights07/10/18 04:46 PM
2

Thanks, that's exactly my point. To me it feels like a part of being human has been lost. And the fact that I have internalized this is really depressing
/r/MensRights27/09/18 10:45 AM
2

Thank god there is most often someone to point out it's a feminist echo chamber. If not, I always make sure to do that myself
/r/MensRights25/09/18 09:17 PM
2

The only thing that's stopping them from calling themselves "r/malefeminists" is that they think they'd offend feminists by calling themselves male feminists. r/menslib functions as a honeypot, giving the false illusion feminism is doing something for men. Grabbing up all people interested in that topic If you look at the stickied post on their page, you'll note that they are basically anti MRA and pro feminist. Have a look at the deleted comment ratio in that sticky: removed comments: 153/630 (…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 09:15 PM
3

Three independant german police stations reporting ridiculously high number of false rape allegations reported to the police: Experts estimate that between 30 and 50 percent of police known cases of sexual assault and rape could be fictitious. https://www.stuttgarter-zeitung.de/inhalt.vergewaltigung-oder-nicht-unschuldig-auf-der-anklagebank.2493a3cf-12db-4b64-afb8-5d7c3992699d.html The police officers responsible for sexual offences estimate the average proportion of false suspicions (§§ 145 d, …
/r/MensRights25/09/18 01:16 PM
129

Of course he did bro from r/dystopiancomics/
/r/MensRights22/09/18 09:46 PM
1

Yes I think you could be right there. As someone else said, this could be the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon https://science.howstuffworks.com/life/inside-the-mind/human-brain/baader-meinhof-phenomenon.htm Attributing everything negative happening to you to a thing that changed recently in your life or something that is important to you in general. And for many women their oppression has become an essential part of their life and identity. But I still believe that women are not being taken as serious…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 05:15 PM
5

There is a huge dark figure for men attempting suicide. The assumption that women attempt suicide more often, stems from the way in which they got to these numbers. They only counted people getting hospitalized for this statistic. And since men are more likely to choose more violent methods to kill themselves, it leads to less men getting hospitalized for a failed attempt. Men who put a gun to their head, or a noose around their neck but get second thoughts at the last moment and don't pull the …
/r/MensRights23/08/18 09:45 AM
8

And that's when the narrative will start to crumble
/r/MensRights22/08/18 03:55 PM
1

Oh god, I can't overcome the cringe watching this. She seems so artificial and false, like a really bad actor. Talking about equity and elevating women. She needs to point out that her daughter has brown skin to gain extra oppression points. I can't stand her. Her about women: "You reflect the best parts of what it means to be human". What a disgusting thing to say. But I have to give her one thing though. Her story about the seat on the plane is believable. I think one downside for women of bei…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 03:42 PM
3

/u/mission_improbables wrote: I used to work for a psychologist and she specialized in female predators and females who have been ordered by the courts to attend therapy because of their sexual behaviors. Just let me say this, there were a constant stream of women. And there was a common theme for attack. Typically they were baby sitters molesting the little boy and girls. And mothers molesting their little boys. Fascinating enough the mothers typically had pedo relations with the boys. While th…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:43 AM
15

The person cited by me has tried living as a man years before his transition. He talks about it in the interview with Paul Elam
/r/MensRights21/08/18 04:40 PM
31

I hold the door open for everyone. And everyone always thanked me in some way, either outspoken or with a smile and nod or something like that, men and women. I smile back. But I live in Germany, there might be cultural differences to where you live. If I had made your experience, I think I would change my behavior accordingly too.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:13 PM
10

Just discovered this interview with him from Paul Elam https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnGQM1b7KrE He is now working as a therapist helping others with depression and stuff.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 01:47 PM
539

An other very relatable part: What continues to strike me is the significant reduction in friendliness and kindness now extended to me in public spaces. It now feels as though I am on my own: No one, outside of family and close friends, is paying any attention to my well-being. I can recall a moment where this difference hit home. A couple of years into my medical gender transition, I was traveling on a public bus early one weekend morning. There were six people on the bus, including me. One was…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 12:57 PM
197

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/2018/07/20/feature/crossing-the-divide-do-men-really-have-it-easier-these-transgender-guys-found-the-truth-was-more-complex/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.675e4410783a Edit: It's very sad, that it does need people who have been women once for the WP to emphasize on the reality in which men live.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 12:46 PM
6

Spain has a socialist government, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:13 PM
4

What a society necessarily needs: Children Taxpayers Free choice for everyone What a society doesn't need: Women in STEM Forced equal representation in any field Most women choose to get kids. Children are a necessity for society. When women get kids, most of them choose to drop out of their highly demanding careers and start caring for their own children. Women choose a better work life balance instead. There is nothing wrong with that, or wrong with a woman choosing a career over family. It's …
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:09 PM
28

Because they are drawing a false conclusion from it. They think the quote justifies men acting bad towards women if women don't behave ladylike. They equate the quote with victim blaming. And victim blaming is associated with rape. Therefor they wrongly conclude this quote encourages rape culture. This is very far reaching and simply a false conclusion. The quote literally doesn't justify anything. It states a simple truth, that you attract what you send out. What the quote DOESN'T say: "If you …
/r/MensRights18/08/18 08:44 AM
1

Playing devils advocate I could offer you plenty of statistics on how men are the perpetrators of 80-90% of violent crime. "Not our fault men have become a threat that women need to avoid for their own best interest" you could argue. It is the same mindset
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:57 AM
5

You can have a look at ANY post trying to discuss feminism. It's simply heresy to shine ANY bad light onto feminism. If you're even suggesting that feminism is somehow at fault somewhere, your post gets deleted. r/menslib is not a place for discussion at all. It is an echo chamber like every other feminist safe space https://www.removeddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/96nqgz/the_alt_right_has_better_mass_market_books_on/
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:55 AM
14

This is very often their argument They gaslight you that men don't get custody because they don't want to, because most custody cases get solved outside of court. They'll tell you in the face, that men don't contribute to the well being of the family in the same way as women when men go out for work. And they use that as a reason, that men shouldn't get custody. On every level, they diminish the part a man plays in the family.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 09:45 AM
3

I will never forget that the NYT doubled down to support an open racist and sexist. Fuck them
/r/MensRights14/08/18 03:50 PM
1

I don't know if you're just explaining or support this, but it's the exact same sexist bullshit feminists are touting: https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/172/490/33d.png Exact same toxic mindset which is poisoning the political debate and relationship between men and women
/r/MensRights14/08/18 03:43 PM
1

You're simply wrong: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki The bombs immediately devastated their targets. Over the next two to four months, the acute effects of the atomic bombings killed 90,000–146,000 people in Hiroshima and 39,000–80,000 people in Nagasaki; roughly half of the deaths in each city occurred on the first day. The United States are responsible for the single worst event in human history.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:40 AM
1

Yeah right
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:04 AM
2

Some say scandinavian countries are the most dangerous for men. But it's actually Canada. There is so much unjust shit having been implemented by law there, it's unbelievable
/r/MensRights12/08/18 08:01 PM
20

Harry nails it in the comments: Harry Beckett 12 Aug 2018 4:24PM 75% of university subjects are numerically dominated by women. 80% of teachers are women. Studies by the OECD, the LSE and others have found that one of the reasons boys don't do as well at school is that teachers mark them down in comparison to girls. And yet still we obsess about supposed discrimination against women in education to the point of now sponsoring what appears to be something like cultural re-education in a very Sovi…
/r/MensRights12/08/18 07:50 PM
3

How do we get these men into "treatment" Get their attention Offer a "treatment" that is attractive to those men Get them to make it their idea to take the offer Make the hurdle of entry as small and easy as possible Make them feel that taking up on the offer was a good idea Let's take men shed's as an example. It's target audience are older lonely men, so (1) use channels to get their attention which old men actually use like newspaper for example. (2) I think the shed's are a good way to help …
/r/MensRights12/08/18 06:52 PM
3

What are you suggesting? If people would really care about those NOT opening up, they would search for other means to reach those people and not criticize them for not being more like others, or more like women. Thats just another punch in the face to those failing to get help
/r/MensRights12/08/18 06:15 PM
4

What should be done to help men struggling emotionally? Offer them help in a form without them having to lose face. Men need to feel useful. If you want to get someone depressed to open up, ask them for help for example and get them to talk doing something simple but productive. Of course they need to be willing to do something about their situation in the first place. But I think the talkative nature of therapy is not best suited for men. Men bond by doing something together, not by talking abo…
/r/MensRights12/08/18 06:14 PM
3

Just 15 days ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/92eb6j/ill_be_honest_i_generally_agree_with_rmenslib/ The menslib sub is useless in the fight for mens rights as they are bound by feminist ideology.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 11:13 AM
12

Yes, it is. It is one of the most infuriating topics for me when feminists tell men to just be more vulnerable and open to get help (more like women). It is so condescending. When I hear it, I like to quote these posts: One of the most hideous concepts comes under the banner of caring and wanting to help men. Feminists have largely recognized that people don't care much about men who share their emotions or vulnerability. Their solution: Men you have to learn to share your emotions more. You kno…
/r/MensRights12/08/18 10:01 AM
5

Place a hidden camera under your clothing Try to enter the building under some made up pretense Get denied access because of gender. Get them to acknowledge that on cam Sue them Profit Apply for a job in said building Get denied based on gender Sue Profit
/r/MensRights11/08/18 12:31 PM
2

I read something like that every week here. And I think it's justified to say this witnessing this stupidity in the world today. But we're still here, the fight has not even started
/r/MensRights11/08/18 12:04 PM
1

Boys and girls tend to perform better in different learning environments and are on average better at different things. That's all there is to the evolutionary perspective.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 11:40 AM
1

Neither sex would've been capable of building modern civilization alone. Men and women are a team. Go after the people trying to divide us.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 11:33 AM
7

Replicating previous findings, women reported higher Big Five Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism scores than men. Agreeableness comprises traits relating to altruism, such as empathy and kindness. Agreeableness involves the tendency toward cooperation, maintenance of social harmony, and consideration of the concerns of others (as opposed to exploitation or victimization of others). Women consistently score higher than men on Agreeableness and related measures, such as tender-mindedness…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 10:38 AM
38

No she didn't: The existing legal definition of rape in England and Wales is gendered, only recognising men as offenders. The law also only recognises as victims of rape those who are penetrated by a penis, either vaginally, anally or orally. This therefore excludes the female perpetrator–male victim paradigm, and more specifically those cases where male victims are ‘forced to penetrate’ female perpetrators. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context/article/…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:02 PM
1

Bullshit it's not. We ALWAYS had influx from r/theredpill r/the_donald or mgtow and incels. Call them out and help keep this sub sane and free from their trolling bullshit! That has always been the way to go here.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 05:33 PM
35

Women out of government next election. Fuck off! Sentences like these are a punch in the faces of all the good women who are fighting alongside mra's. It's not even especially the uk government that's fucked up. It's the police force. There is something seriously wrong with UK police force, especially in London. Edit: /u/goodmod why has this comment been removed? There are still enough sane people to call those people out on their bullshit. It's not necessary to censor and moderate against the f…
/r/MensRights06/08/18 03:12 PM
3

You have to consider that the 8% number comes from cases that are decided in court
/r/MensRights05/08/18 07:09 PM
11

You don't need to be able to read german there is google translate 1), 2)https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ostsee-zeitung.de%2FMecklenburg%2FRostock%2FAcht-von-zehn-Vergewaltigungen-sind-vorgetaeuscht&edit-text=&act=url 3) They're citing the police and their statistics, there is nothing to trust, it's hard data. The ostsee zeitung is a typical regional newspaper with about 120.000 selling copies and 400 employees. Other police sta…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 07:07 PM
16

That makes it three german police stations reporting ridiculously high false allegation numbers. Bayern: https://www.polizei.bayern.de/content/4/3/7/vergewaltigung_und_sexuelle_n_tigung_in_bayern_bpfi.pdf Stuttgart: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stuttgarter-zeitung.de%2Finhalt.vergewaltigung-oder-nicht-unschuldig-auf-der-anklagebank.2493a3cf-12db-4b64-afb8-5d7c3992699d.html&edit-text= Rostock: https://translate.google.com/tran…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 07:00 PM
18

Since 2007, Chief Criminal Investigator Britta Rabe has been dealing with sexual offences in Rostock and the district, together with three colleagues. More and more often, however, investigators are dealing with false cases: Eight out of ten sexual offences are faked. We take these ads very seriously,"emphasizes KPI CEO Peter Mainka. It would be searched for possible perpetrators with a large police force, elaborate forensics would be carried out at crime scenes, many witnesses would be question…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:55 PM
5

Dude, he is calling for murder! That's illegal! Stop justifying this bullshit! Two wrongs don't make one right.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 09:28 AM
8

I can't find what you're saying. Also, not using an NP link to other subs is against the rules in r/mensrights
/r/MensRights19/07/18 02:52 PM
7

Great Job!
/r/MensRights05/07/18 12:35 PM
2

No, unfortunately not. But I'm not a native speaker myself.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 09:13 AM
19

People have massively misinterpreted what everything he says means, because they want to. They want him to be the enemy.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 08:52 AM
3

I don't understand what you mean, could you rephrase it for me please?
/r/MensRights22/06/18 12:14 PM
12

Obesity is not curvy. Curvy will be the new fat when we start calling fat people curvy and it gets a bad rep. That's just how this works. People will never get this. Changing words like feminists will do nothing.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 11:52 AM
3

look at r/mensrightslinks and /r/MRRef i'm sure it's there somewhere
/r/MensRights18/06/18 09:21 PM
1

Peterson on women in politics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfvkq7k3EtI As always, I had the same thoughts as peterson on this topic, but wasn't able to articulate them as he does. Women are bringing a whole bunch of new factors into politics. We will see how this will turn out.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 02:33 PM
92

George Orwell You're making the mistake they want to help you. Their ideology doesn't want to own up to anything. They want to win over you
/r/MensRights18/06/18 01:59 PM
9

You are in danger of getting falsely accused by a scorned woman if you're going to end your relationship with her! This may sound like victim blaming, but you should consider to stop insulting her and escalating the situation! Telling her she is sick doesn't help your situation at all. You don't get anything for getting her to acknowledge she is at fault. If you feel she is not a positive influence in your life, just leave her! But be careful, if she is the abusive person you think she is, you s…
/r/MensRights16/06/18 11:50 AM
6

Men are more likely to be involved in auto accidents. That's not actually true. Men are more likely to be involved into heavy auto accident's though
/r/MensRights16/06/18 11:25 AM
3

Here is a graph that's pretty telling. Divorce per 1000 people is going up and marriage rate is going down as an overall trend. https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://img.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/files/2015/06/marriages_divorces_per_capita.png&w=1484 (Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/23/144-years-of-marriage-and-divorce-in-the-united-states-in-one-chart/?utm_term=.87414029704e)
/r/MensRights02/06/18 10:09 AM
283

Thanks. Looks like he really is a pedophile and her action are on a total different level.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 07:42 PM
2

Reliable male birth control would help men not get tricked by evil women into fatherhood.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 07:58 AM
2

/u/Mr_MRAnarchist is a well known troll around here. Look how much attention she is creating with her vitriol. Just ignore her Btw this is also a known fallacy. If you seek attention on the internet and ask for something, you will get a reply from a whole range of people. From pure evil and mean trolling to the well meaning over the top best advice ever and a lot in between. When you now go and judge the criticism you get by the worst and disregard the rest, you're making a mistake.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 07:42 AM
1

I don't know where even to start, so I will just be so polite to answer your questions If you had an adult who had a non-exploitative, non-abusive sexual relationship with a 10 year old, would that be okay? There is no such thing as a non-exploitative sexual relationship between a 10 year old and a grown up. Such a "relationship" would always be exploitive as the other grown up has an unfair advantage over the child. Each society figured out different age barriers where this is the case. Nowhere…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 01:36 PM
8

If you're able to, get out your phone and start filming asap. Back up and try to deescalate the situation as much as you can. Call for help if possible If you can't remove yourself from the situation, use necessary force to restrain her from harming you Make a backup copy of the video directly after the incident If you forget step 1, you're basically at the whim of the woman. I personally would call the police after the incident and after I backed up the video evidence. But that is at least a qu…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 11:12 AM
5

It is normal for children to explore their sexuality. It is normal for children to explore their sexuality with their peers. It is not normal or healthy when it happens in an exploitive manner against someone else's will. A big age difference can be part of that. I don't see that happening in OP's story. It doesn't matter if he was the instigator of this or the girl and the two years age difference are not as significant to indicate an exploitive relationship. Girls mature earlier than boys too.…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 10:49 AM
25

Replace "women" with "feminism" and you got it right
/r/MensRights28/05/18 10:00 AM
3

Wow it is so clear and understandable now. I have seen this clip before, just with a different framing handed to me before and interpreted what he said totally different. Really interesting how our brains work. I don't even remember how I could ever interpreted this any different. I'ts like you show me totally different clip. Am I the only one?
/r/MensRights27/05/18 04:46 PM
18

Everyone gets this treatment when they argue against the narrative. Peterson has a way to not get eaten by it. They're desperate to destroy his common sense.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 04:39 PM
20

It's a default sub. You're automatically subscribed.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 02:44 PM
13

Archive this crab, don't give them any clicks: http://archive.is/3bSlB If you believe in patriarchy theory you're a conspiracy nutjob to begin with and shouldn't be taken seriously
/r/MensRights26/05/18 09:00 PM
1

If your wife is pregnant and you know it can't be yours, don't you have enough time to divorce her? Reliable male birth control is the answer to many male issues.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 02:32 PM
2

Unfortunately not. Condoms are not a reliable male birth control. And they can get tampered with. Erin Pizzey stated in her interview with Cassie Jaye (I think it was in this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jzb4T0RBQ1Y, that the men's rights movement should focus on advancing the research for a men's bc as it would free men from unwanted reproduction responsibilities in the same way women have been since the invention of the bc pill.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 11:49 AM
0

I agree with all of what you're saying. But this should be clarified by OP too. As of now, the post on it's own is sending a questionable vibe
/r/MensRights26/05/18 11:44 AM
2

Probably got deleted because of rule #2 No posts about bannings by other moderators (too common, not relevant to topic of "rights")
/r/MensRights26/05/18 10:47 AM
1

Why have you deleted your post?
/r/MensRights26/05/18 10:42 AM
1

I do believe there is a gender pay gap and ethnic pay gap. This has nothing to do with believing. There is clear hard evidence that the pay gap in the average pay of men and women is not due to their sex but because of other factors like education, hours worked, negotiating salary, hours of overtime, part time full time, having gap years in your career and so on and so on. And it's the same for all countries. And I suggest that the ethnic pay gap is due to other reasons than ethnicity too. At le…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 10:37 AM
2

There is no gender pay gap. The gap between men and women in pay is NOT because to their sex, but because of other factors the two sexes are more likely to exhibit. If you calculate those factors out, the pay gap vanishes. This is a fact feminists willingly chose to ignore. That said, there is a possibility that the pay gap between ethnic minority men and white women is probably not because of their race either but because of other factors too. Please post the figures you are talking about.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 10:05 AM
9

You know that the only thing this author is looking for is clicks and you are providing this for him. Attention is money and you're giving it to them for free. Use archives for shitty authors like /u/thrway_1000 demonstrates and maybe replace the link in your post with the archived one!
/r/MensRights26/05/18 09:48 AM
1

What exactly is criticized with this post? I don't get it. Sometimes female homelessness IS the fault of ONE man. This is a fact as much as it is a fact that there are many men who are homeless because of female violence. So since there are much more men living on the street, does this mean no company can ever advertise the fact that it can happen the other way around? Of course I get it, the number of charities or help for men is in no way comparable to that of women and so are the number of ho…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 09:45 AM
2

Watch or get other people to watch the movie "The Red Pill" from Cassie Jaye to raise awareness (http://theredpillmovie.com/) It's currently available on amazon prime "for free". Also make sure to write a review if you've liked it
/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:08 AM
3

Maybe the reason for that are the new EU privacy laws? Don't be so quick to make this a conspiracy. Btw, if you haven't watched the movie, I highly recommend it. You can watch it "for free" with Amazon Prime. https://www.amazon.com/Red-Pill-Cassie-Jaye/dp/B06XGXD5LL/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1527232530&sr=8-1&keywords=the+red+pill+movie
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:16 AM
-1

Because it is a potent drug affecting one of your most important neurotransmitters, Dopamin. Normal people are taking ADHD medication to concentrate better during learning phases before exams. I tried it myself, it helps me focus. That doesn't necessarily mean I have ADHD, or wait... does it? I don't have any opinion on wether or not ADHD is real or not. I would rather say it is real and listen to your doc and not some people on the internet though. But I think that there is an underlying crisis…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 10:50 AM
3

Read the article. Itself states that marriage may not be the reason men live healthier. It's the old mistake of conflating correlation with causation. You can have all the benefits of a marriage without marriage.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 10:42 AM
4

check out /r/menkampf or try it yourself. Replace the words man with jew and woman with arier in feminist literature and you will see why they're called feminazi's
/r/MensRights24/05/18 10:13 AM
3

Get her to tell the truth about your relationship first, then do this! I would do this.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 10:36 AM
3

Is this a peer reviewed study?
/r/MensRights22/05/18 06:47 PM
3

Your comments got deleted
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:44 PM
3

Germany: Indecent exposure in public (exhibitionism) is only punishable for men.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:11 AM
4

Thanks, Amazon also hosts "The Red Pill"
/r/MensRights17/05/18 03:44 PM
3

What are spotify alternatives?
/r/MensRights17/05/18 02:23 PM
14

I really loved that post, it had such a wholesome spirit. There is no reason it got deleted but bitterness
/r/MensRights16/05/18 05:15 PM
2

May result in stoicism, some men feeling they cannot talk about their issues, men dismissing the men who do come forward as wusses. Have you yourself experienced this kind of behavior? I would have to think really hard about it. But I could imagine that in some groups this is true. Edit: What I find is true that manny men simply don't want to talk about their issues because it doesn't give them anything. Men need to fix things and not only talk about it. Men heal through action not talk. But of …
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:29 AM
4

Hypermasculinity or "toxic masculinity" is the feminist projection of what they think mens most important problems should have to be. I've never had problems openly discussing my problems with my male friends. May I ask you if you're a woman or a man, how old you are and what your real personal experience with "hypermasculinity" has been so far?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 10:54 AM
5

You won't ever change the perspective of all people. To get real change to happen it is not necessary to have a favorable view.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 07:57 AM
7

I would say it is a way for this toxic ideology to gain power. The metoo movement is just another tool to take power away from men and give it to women. Feminism was always about power. And power is privilege. What the feminist movement forgot though, and this is what makes them the villain, is that with great power comes great responsibility. They made it that even thinking about holding women accountable for misuse of forms of female power looks like misogyny.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 07:52 AM
4

Check out /r/MRRef /r/mensrightslinks www.mrarchivist.com for helpful links and peer reviewed studies
/r/MensRights10/05/18 06:50 PM
16

And this way feminism becomes a perpetual self feeding beast. It's both the cause and the self imputed cure to "toxic masculinity" in one.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:26 AM
8

There is a small chance that technological advantage will cancel out these evolutionary advantages though. For example it's possible that robots and AI will replace human soldiers. The birth control pill changed women's gender roles and made feminism possible. Maybe robots will free men from their role as providers and protectors too, we'll see.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 08:53 AM
5

There is no free speech anymore in the UK. Even though this message is borderline on a call to violence I guess in context it's clear it's a joke to every participant in the group chat. In times when every sexual interaction is perceived as rape by feminists, isn't it legitimate joke or satire to call sex rape? At least they're beginning to protest now for free speech in the UK.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 08:03 AM
3

It doesn't matter what gender the "oppressing" ruling class has or has had, what matters is, that he is victim BECAUSE of his gender which we as a society agreed is reprehensible for women, so it should be for men too. The gender of the perpetrator is not important, the perpetration because of gender is.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 07:53 AM
14

I don't know about you, but if war broke out tomorrow, and some authority told me to go out and kill a bunch of people I don't know, I would prefer to flee than go to war. Notions of honor and glory in the battlefield are lies told to young men in order to convince them to die for someone else. It's the epitome of male disposability. There's no honor or glory in being dead. The only reason they build memorials is to convince the next generation of men to go die as well, should the need arise. Tr…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 07:42 AM
37

It might have been a defence mechanism on my part, but I developed a deep feeling that it might be wrong to approach women and that it might be an imposition on them. I was certainly never going to be that guy who "used" women. I felt women had the right to go about everyday life and enjoy a night out without having anyone approach them. This is what the feminist message does to shy, introverted guys. Literally a shit test. Confident, loud and upfront men, who are probably more likely to catcall…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 07:28 AM
2

Yes it is a truly destructive dynamic for our society. If you're a regular here, I encourage you to counter other arguments respectfully whenever you see something you don't think to be true. It's very difficult and counter intuitive to work against your own cognitive bias, but let's hold ourselves to a higher standard.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 07:02 AM
6

So do you think u/mwobuddy is making a true observation of reality with his post or not? The difference between Incel and MRA's is what you do with these observation of reality. We can discuss wether this observation is true or not, and we can discuss what would be a solution for these men and how they can interpret this reality without getting bitter and resentful. You're obviously both against someone running over women with cars
/r/MensRights10/05/18 06:55 AM
11

It's because it would identify the underaged girl to name her I guess
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:46 PM
0

Yes! Never has feminism done anything that is solely beneficial to men, NEVER, not once!
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:00 PM
2

Unfortunately even in self defense situation, this could be put as not using reasonable force to defend yourself. They're cowards. Film, de-mask and fight back in a reasonable way and they will normally scatter off.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 01:17 PM
3

It's actually a really sad sign and not funny. Try posting it in left leaning subs yourself and see how that flies. If you think this is a factual and interesting video and it gets banned from left leaning subs, what does that say you about those subs? Many if not most people here in r/mensrights consider themselves classical left wing or liberal
/r/MensRights09/05/18 10:12 AM
3

Police knows this. Several german police stations report the same. Majority of rape reports are unfounded when investigated, though they don't reach court and get thrown out and probably don't show up in any statistic.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 10:06 AM
4

The lowest figure with any credible research behind it is 8%. This is true. It's based on the FBI statistic on "unfounded" rape allegations. FBI reports from 1995, 1996, and 1997 consistently put the number of "unfounded" forcible rape accusations around 8%. In contrast, the average rate of unfounded reports for all "index crimes" (murder, aggravated assault, forcible rape, robbery, arson, burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft) tracked by the FBI is 2%.[25][26][27] This estimate, howe…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 10:03 AM
2

Disclaimer, I am not a lawyer and this is not a complete list. These are just things I read about and experienced in my life from people around me being in these situations. These are things that helped men get through a divorce or if they've had done it this way would've avoided them a lot of struggle. There are a lot more advice to consider, even dark triad advice, these are just the more tame ones that came to my mind immediately. All this doesn't mean your wife will turn into a monster, but …
/r/MensRights08/05/18 12:33 PM
3

Where does he speak of "oppression"? You can't even quote right. Fuck off troll
/r/MensRights08/05/18 10:01 AM
1

Organize a protest! Convince the popular boys first, get them to help you recruit others, tell everyone to tell their friends. Go to other classes and spread the message! Get the girls on your side too! Tell everyone to wear shorts the next day, the girls too, (or whenever you want the protest to happen) and get them to bring at least one spare shorts for people wanting to join in with you the last minute! Tell them to meet at a distinct place in front of your school! If you're sure and absolute…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 09:28 AM
456

Woman at 3:11 I thought this was like a feminist vid, is this the point of this really? Surprising how suddenly "feminism is for equality" is not the point anymore when it comes to highlighting the problems men face.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 09:07 AM
17

This article is from 2014 and they're talking about numbers from 2012. Much time has passed since then, and probably nothing has been done to address this problem. On the contrary, boys are even less adequately encouraged and promoted in education I bet.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 09:00 AM
20

You need to be very careful about your next steps if you want to divorce your wife. Don't talk to the police anymore as necessary but be polite and friendly, they are not your friends and will use EVERYTHING you say against you! Do the following without your wife knowing of it! Play along for a while like everything is fine with your marriage before you tell her you want a divorce. Secure every legal document you have and store them at your parents or somewhere else safe. Make a backup of everyt…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 08:44 AM
5

Which joke, the one with the three scissors?
/r/MensRights04/05/18 03:48 PM
67

Use www.deepl.com for almost perfect translation, fuck google and their agenda Translation: Dispute over child support Father must pay for unwanted child A woman forged her ex-husband's signature to get artificial insemination. The man then wanted to be exempted from his maintanance obligations - and failed in court. A man whose ex-wife had fertilised eggs used without his consent and became pregnant must pay support for the unwanted child. This was decided by the Medical Liability Chamber of th…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 06:43 PM
3

It's definitely interesting, but there could be many other reasons for that too. Is the harassment coming form coworkers or reports in general e.g.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 02:45 PM
2

Technically you are of course correct, but that is not how we define altruism, isn't it
/r/MensRights27/04/18 01:18 PM
36

But one brave man stands up against inequality pushed by these bigots: Tory MP Philip Davies says more women should be sent to prison to achieve equality with men
/r/MensRights27/04/18 11:56 AM
6

Those will probably get deleted soon, as always. We'll see, but you're right, the public perception of male issues and male perspective is growing. They can't stop it Edit: Archive of the post
/r/MensRights27/04/18 09:35 AM
8

He'll die behind bars
/r/MensRights26/04/18 08:44 PM
1

The thing is, the Incel community and the mgtow community are both inherently fine. Incel just states that these people are not able to attract someone of the opposite sex. And mgtow stands for not wanting to do anything with women. It's when the generalization comes into it and the harassment of individuals that it gets unhealthy. At the optimum we should be the healthy solution, the positive valve to both their problems. Namely making it not worth or too risky to associate with women for mgtow…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 05:45 PM
1

Why not both?
/r/MensRights26/04/18 05:36 PM
3

I don't understand your point. But Rodgers, Minassian and Sodini were probably no macho, patriarchal or particularly masculine men. They would've rather described themselves as beta incels, or not? They are toxic people, not toxic masculine, that would make no sense. Masculinity means taking responsibility for yourself and others, neither one of them did anything close to this. Edit: Men who take responsibility and are therefor masculine, don't end up alone. Feminine women love masculine men. Th…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 02:07 PM
-1

Yes, I observed the same, and it's sad because it's simply not true. I encourage you to go and call these people out on that. I bet the absolute majority of women don't want men only spaces gone. The majority of women love men and just want the best for the men in their lives as the other way around. One problem is though, that the absolute majority of women are silent on feminist hypocrisy and their destroying ideology too. Men can't defend themselves against feminism and women in the current c…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 08:12 AM
1

So what? Women lie, men lie, there must be reasons
/r/MensRights25/04/18 07:20 PM
36

Pure power fantasy. This is what the radical feminists dream of, being almighty without consequence. And people are giving the ideology they created the power to rule over what equality and what not.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 07:15 PM
21

Who gives a fuck about people who don't take the human rights of half the population seriously? What's decried here is the double standard. Feminists try to destroy every single male only space as sexist, every single one, while on the other hand they go and celebrate shit like this. It's feminist hypocrisy that is the problem here. You're nothing but a concern troll, so troll off.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:34 PM
4

To keep up the illusion the male workers must work in darkness, keeping out of sight. We all know what happened to the morlocks. We need to stop this! /s
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:27 PM
2

Be careful. Check the law in England for recording people first. Maybe someone else can help. If you take action you should absolutely be aware of what you do and what the consequences can be. Transcribe everything you remember her saying and everything she's going to say. Or if legal, make a recording. See if there is a official complaint form like Title IX in the US for the UK to report something like that to authority. If you go and "confront" your teacher make sure to be respectful, calm and…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 10:10 AM
1

Do you want to do something about this, or do you want to rant? Both is absolutely fine, but if you ask for help you should clarify this. In which country/state do you live?
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:37 AM
1

It's not women, it's mother nature who's the cunt
/r/MensRights24/04/18 07:21 PM
1

Don't worry. Even if men will stopp to provide for women eventually, the state will have women's back as it's replacing men as a provider and functions as one big distributor of wealth from men to women.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 07:04 PM
1

Please look back at it and maybe open another post for this if you find the time.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 06:57 PM
3

11: The primary caregiver lie: Women are the primary caregivers and therefore should get sole custody after divorce
/r/MensRights24/04/18 01:51 PM
1

Joke is on her, she offers some good advice for men.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:21 AM
9

Own what you got, while working towards what you want. Perfect message!
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:13 AM
2

you're right
/r/MensRights17/04/18 12:05 PM
3

Women have and dominate social media
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:51 AM
10

It's not satire. Feminists want to change the paradigm of blaming the victim into blaming the rapist. Not educating women how to not get raped and be careful but educating the rapists (men) how not to rape.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:47 AM
10

General: www.mrarchivist.com /r/mensrightslinks /r/MRRef I don't know if the following fit your criteria though: Custody: According to the report, in 96 per cent of cases, the parents who apply to court for “access” to their children are men, with the average case taking between six months and two years to complete. In just under half of these cases, dads will win the right to have their children stay with them overnight, with the most common arrangement being every other weekend. Just under a q…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:18 AM
3

Of course not. Probably every characteristic exists on a spectrum distributed like a bell curve
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:10 AM
6

I got news for you, nature ist sexist. It literally shaped us into two different sexes, each with strength and weaknesses. No amount of diversity training or feminist propaganda will change this. Our form of society will long be gone before human evolution will change. Women are, on average, about 60% weaker and are more prone to injuries. This doesn't mean that there are no women who are capable of serving in the military, simply that they are less capable on average.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 10:01 PM
11

Source? It would think there was some context behind it, like a comedic one?
/r/MensRights16/04/18 03:28 PM
5

No, it's the evolutionary biology spin on it. Btw, women ARE less capable of serving in the military. And that has evolutionary reasons too. But I guess they don't teach biology in women's studies.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 03:24 PM
1

Thanks. I'll double check and take them out if they don't work or search other sources when I have time for it.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 02:02 PM
311

I agree only to some extend. Women are loved for their youth and beauty or summarized, for the ability to provide healthy offspring. Men are loved for their ability to provide for that offspring (and the woman). Nobody cares about ugly women in the same way nobody cares about men who cannot provide. Ugly women are treated like men, on merit. Though, most women are seen as beautiful enough by men to be provided for. Only a small minority of women is seen as ugly. When ugly women are treated like …
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:31 PM
4

Ironic that the Eyebleachbot chose to show a picture of a happy baby in a thread about circumcision
/r/MensRights16/04/18 10:09 AM
3

I included this paragraph because there are people saying that comparing female genital mutilation with MGM is wrong. It shows it isn't because it is comparable. The fact that the foreskin has even more functions and nerve endings than the clitoral hood is further proving that fact. I will think about rewriting that part, including the fact that the foreskin has even more significant functions than the ch.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 10:08 AM
7

From r/mensrightslinks: We find that the most important effects come from the interplay between student and teacher gender. Male students tend to bet less when assessed by a female teacher than by an external examiner or by a male teacher. This is consistent with female teachers' grading practices; female teachers give lower grades to male students. [..] The gender results show that students' beliefs tend to increase the gender gap in investment and effort. A male teacher increases the effort an…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 09:59 AM
3

Based on the amount of clickbait I see on this sub I was conditioned to doubt your title Be the change you want to see for this sub. Call people out on using clickbait titles (it's actually against the rules) and call people out on bias or not telling the whole truth. I made the observation that if you do it in a polite manner you will get positive feedback.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 09:55 AM
8

This is a copypasta I try to maintain on circumcision and how it can be harmful. I don't dislike circumcision in general, I just despise infant circumcision. There is Female Genital Mutilation Type I a, classified by the WHO, which is the removal of the clitoral hood. The clitoral hood develops into the foreskin in male fetus. So FGM Type I a for a girl is what circumcision is for a boy. It is the same bodypart on different genders. The medical term for female mutilation type 1 a is literally "c…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 09:50 AM
6

Yes, I'm definitely gonna contact the police Awesome! Filing a police report is not only good to prevent it from happening to others (if they catch him), it will help the men's rights cause in general (even if they don't catch him) because your case will get into the statistics. It may also help yourself, because you took action and you will find closure with this incident even if it didn't affect you that much. Please don't think because it didn't impact you this much you're the wrong kind of v…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 09:46 AM
7

They are mostly punished for filing a false report, not because they harmed another person or robbed them of their freedom and reputation. I mostly hear from the state persecuting these people because of wasting police resources etc.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 09:33 AM
22

There should be a transition phase in which people don't get punished if they come forward with a false accusation, but after one or two years it should come with a heavy punishment. There would be a legal basis to punish them for "kidnapping" through proxy by the state for example. Not punishing them is the wrong way! This needs to change! Edit: By transition phase I mean a phase for example until 2020 and after that it's hard line for every false accuser
/r/MensRights16/04/18 09:04 AM
3

Bettina Arndt on today’s sex starved husbands
/r/MensRights13/04/18 05:59 AM
3

Don't forget the two other option, which I don't condone in any way: Coercion. Make her want to abort Violence We need to point out these are the only possibilities men have left. Feminists established the coat hanger as a symbol for pro choice and as one of their valid arguments, if you don't allow it some women will do it nevertheless illegally. Maybe mra's should establish a man violently kicking a pregnant woman down the stairs as our pro choice symbol for men. /s
/r/MensRights12/04/18 01:23 PM
1

I agree with you in principle with make women care. But it will not work. You will just come off for them as another right wing mra that wants to turn the clock back. Chances are better to convince liberal governments that it's best for women and children if men can "abort" Edit: Forgot to post this link for the second point: http://archive.is/Yzmka
/r/MensRights12/04/18 01:18 PM
2

As long as abortion laws allow this then we must demand that men also get a legal opt out of parenthood I agree with that OR we have to stop supporting abortion for women too. And disagree with that Your solution appears to be to do nothing and hope things change on their own. They won't. My solution is to advocate for a mans right to legal parental surrender because it's in the best interest of the child to grow up with a wanting father and not with an abusive mother who tricks men into parenth…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 01:02 PM
4

Not only that, I don't think a lot of men realise that having an abortion isn't as easy as we think. Oh, a lot of men realize that. They realize it the moment they want to become a father but the mother aborts. It can take a toll on someone's mental health to have to make the choice to basically end a life before it's begun. Same is true for men. You have explained why women should have the right to an abortion. But you haven't explained why men shouldn't have the same right. You have not made a…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 12:36 PM
2

The reason things never change is because men support women and women support women but neither support men. So your solution is to stop supporting women? I disagree with that. And on top of that, the circumstances and reasons for a woman's right to abortion are not the same as a man rights to parental surrender.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 12:19 PM
57

Never fails to make me laugh
/r/MensRights11/04/18 09:21 PM
2

so feminist cannot really claim they're a biased source. ehem
/r/MensRights11/04/18 10:25 AM
3

1) Where are you from and from which state if you're from the US? 2) What would you answer to this feminist argument: In the US again, it is true that mothers more commonly have custody. However, analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth shows that in 51% of cases, this was decided by the parents alone with no involvement of the courts. Only 4% actually went to family court, and even then, only 1.5% had custody decided by litigation. So, fatherlessness is obviously an issue, but a system-…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 05:31 PM
2

wake up... /s
/r/MensRights10/04/18 04:27 PM
2

Crossposts are against their rule #9
/r/MensRights10/04/18 03:04 PM
2

To be fair, it is against the rules in r/mensrights to crosspost without an "np" link and against the rules of r/childfree (rule 9)
/r/MensRights10/04/18 03:03 PM
10

The thread got nuked
/r/MensRights10/04/18 12:22 PM
2

I agree with that point. If you try to help people you should be asking how can I reach them to help and not how do they have to change to get help!
/r/MensRights10/04/18 09:55 AM
1

Can you explain how this survey and their website is rubbish?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 09:28 AM
8

Safe haven laws are a good thing. A good thing for these kids, because some of them would probably die/be killed otherwise and many of them forced to live with mothers that are not able to support them. A child should be raised in a household where the child is wanted. These mothers are completely overwhelmed with the situation, not fit to be a parent and most of the time don't have the means to know what to do. Now here is the catch, of course these laws should be extended to men. Men should ha…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 08:10 AM
1

To be fair, the elevator the man in this comic supposedly built has no exit at the top. But this says more about the logic of the artist than anybody else, lol
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:51 PM
1

Amy Yeungs study suggests otherwise on women but lets hope so.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:47 PM
5

What about women only hours in gyms and swimming baths that have been successfully contested by mra's? What about women in men's sheds in Australia? We should thrive for consistency in our argument, or maybe find a middle ground? Isn't this hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 02:58 PM
1

It was a wonderful thing when he said "looks like we are gonna need to take her in too," I guess some justice is better than no justice at all. I wish you good luck in finding a partner that treats you right!
/r/MensRights09/04/18 02:47 PM
1

Yes, the robots are coming, but women and feminists will still demand preferential treatment by those AI's when they experience the same treatment as men. And women ARE the majority of voters and they will agree with feminists, because most of them will feel it's right.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 02:45 PM
3

So tell me about your values in regards to circumcision. How can you criticize bodily harm against someones will in a domestic violence situation but not circumcision? Don't you see that as a conflict within your own values?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 11:22 AM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/83wcyb/students_say_diversity_is_more_important_than/ (or https://www.creators.com/read/michael-barone/03/18/women-against-free-speech) https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=women+free+speech&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all in general have a look at r/mrref, r/mensrightslinks and www.mrarchivist.com
/r/MensRights09/04/18 10:29 AM
1

*virginity
/r/MensRights09/04/18 10:25 AM
5

How can you make such an intelligent post but at the same time are able to say this in a debate about circumcision? There's a word in Russian that escapes me at the moment for when an individual is so entrenched inside a system that they cannot see outside of it. Your cousin is the embodiment of that situation. He himself supports and enforces a value system that treats him and other men as less than equal, and he can't even escape it. You are literally describing yourself with that within the c…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 10:06 AM
4

There are other mods?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 09:56 AM
10

It's okay, let it out. I can take it and I forgive you
/r/MensRights09/04/18 09:53 AM
2

Because parents usually do what they think is best for their kids. Intention matters. Parents have to make a million decisions for their kids and many of them may turn out to be wrong. Circumcision is clearly one of them. And it's one of the few where the result is obvious to the kid.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:18 AM
12

I get you. This movie is attacking a part of your identity and what your religion or the culture did to you. Of course this makes you angry. But you should direct your anger at the system, the indoctrination of some religions which let your unknowing parents believe they have to cut your penis and not at someone advertising for a movie which seeks to stop this practice.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:10 AM
1

Okay, alienated was probably the wrong word for it. I just think Morgan Freeman is right in with opinion about that. It is harmful for the relationship between black and white people to segregate the same as it would do more bad than good to have a white male celebration month. Edit: I don't know to what degree segregation is bad to be honest. I don't know where the line is. But the racial tensions between white and black people is too strong nowadays. We should unite people not divide them
/r/MensRights08/04/18 07:45 PM
1

I think it will be difficult to get custody statistics for whole Europe. It's probably easier to focus on one country If you haven't found anything at google or google scholar, have a look at www.mrarchivist.com /r/mensrightslinks /r/MRRef
/r/MensRights08/04/18 05:27 PM
26

This is it. Feminist agenda outlawed normal sex. Pretty much all sex is now considered rape and you're automatically guilty. Andrea Dworkins endgame accomplished. She's probably laughing in her grave. How can you not go insane in this decadent world?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 05:18 PM
2

It angers me so much that people like this are at the head of a movement that aims to decide what justice and equality looks like and what not.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 04:50 PM
7

OP from that post made a new analysis of the following subs mods: 'r/me_irl', 'r/socialism', 'r/communism', 'r/enoughtrumpspam', 'r/thebluepill', 'r/gamerghazi', 'r/againstmensrights', and 'r/shitredditsays' https://i.imgur.com/MfTgIMS.jpg Have a look a how strong r/science, displayed in the bottom left, is infested with left wing ideology. Really sad
/r/MensRights08/04/18 10:52 AM
2

It is foreseeable that feminists and most women in general will brand fair gender equal AI robot judges and police as misogynist, because they interpret their fair behavior as hostile sexism towards them. They will say that they are a tool of the patriarchy because they have been programmed by only men also known as brogrammers and therefore have a male centric view of justice. I guarantee this will happen. There was an interesting study from Amy Yeung about exactly this topic: Although there is…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 10:34 AM
49

Unfortunately they still do! Feminist are not discouraged by facts, otherwise the paygap myth would have died long ago or they wouldn't perpetuate the (transphobic) myth that gender is a social construct. I encourage you to watch the whole debate from Philip Davies in Westminster Hall mostly with Kate Green from the Labour party, or just the part coming up, which is characteristic for the whole debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTJ2tlrPFlk&t=4m55s
/r/MensRights08/04/18 09:20 AM
1

I thought he had his own party called Justice for men and boys. Has this changed? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Buchanan_(politician)
/r/MensRights07/04/18 09:21 PM
7

The best at almost anything are men. Prove it?
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:34 PM
1

There was a beef between Jamie Killstein, who is described in the article, and Joe Rogan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYhxFvLTFbs Years later, Rogan invited him to his podcast to talk about his story and how his peers treated him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fa_ZA9k5t4
/r/MensRights07/04/18 10:34 AM
1

u/RJPatrick wrote: My god. You language is soaked with hatred and bigotry. I can't have a discussion with you, you've already decided that women are evil. The patriarchy has done all the evil things you describe, plus so much more, to women for thousands of years. I'm sorry, but you're just completely blind to the big picture. At least now I know you're just trolling. You didn't consider any of my arguments, you're just accusing me of misogyny, attacking my character and not the argument. A clas…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 09:32 AM
2

Good to hear that at least some feminists "in power" preach self-evident human decency. But until I see feminists do something solely for the benefit of men, I will not believe it's a movement for equality but female supremacy.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 08:55 AM
2

Reminded me of this: Men who accused Gamergate of misogyny; where are they now? … (In jail)
/r/MensRights07/04/18 08:41 AM
3

Maybe we should re-watch Mean Girls /s There is a guide to counter a SJW attack though already, it's probably similar http://www.the-niceguy.com/contributors/SurvivalGuide.html or https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=6WpQBREBDfQ
/r/MensRights07/04/18 08:23 AM
7

Now that you say it it's pretty clear. It's a pathological female bullying strategy to go after someones reputation. Branding someone a misogynist or a nazi is going after their reputation.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 07:29 AM
2

Of course there is none about men and domestic violence. Domestic violence of men is an understudied crime. Why do you think is that? I found this about women though, what a surprise: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2644020/ Which states that 62% of women suffering from domestic violence are depressed and 9% out of those are somewhat suicidal. Now I want you to think about how about 50% of domestic violence victims are men about how women are pretty clever at inflicting psychologica…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 07:07 AM
0

Do you think your insult helps change his mind and convey your argument?
/r/MensRights07/04/18 06:39 AM
10

and so does /u/RJPatrick
/r/MensRights06/04/18 09:42 PM
9

The only one relativizing anything here is you not the video, don't you see that? The problem with this is that people might start to think that men are subject to the same magnitude of violence and sexual violence that women are, which is not true. Oh no, imagine people would start to think some men are subject to the same magnitude of violence and sexual violence that women are, imagine the suffering of lost victim status for women. Don't you see how misguided and harmful your argument is? If …
/r/MensRights06/04/18 09:41 PM
16

The topic domestic violence only ever gets deleted there when it's the "wrong" politics https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/6fw549/that_time_seth_rogen_blasted_the_grammys_for/
/r/MensRights06/04/18 09:33 PM
58

No videos of real-life, malicious person-on-person assault/battery or physical abuse of animals. It doesn't fit
/r/MensRights06/04/18 09:31 PM
1

Still works for me. But you can check ceddit too: https://www.ceddit.com/r/science/comments/8a55bb/a_new_study_finds_that_men_in_stem_subject_areas/#
/r/MensRights06/04/18 04:49 PM
74

Fucking WOW! What happened in this thread is really disturbing. First you have to know that the one who posted this "study" was a top level mod. And then you have to see for yourself that even the top comments which criticized the "study" on a constructive basis and figuratively destroyed it, got deleted. https://removeddit.com/r/science/comments/8a55bb/a_new_study_finds_that_men_in_stem_subject_areas/# I know they have strict rules on r/science, which is good, but the deleted comments clearly d…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 04:21 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rv0uLapMqPc&t=39m18s "Everywhere but Netflix" out of political reasons because Netflix main audience is the typical sjw millennial.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 04:05 PM
2

Yes, it is. It is one of the most infuriating topics for me when feminists tell men to just be more vulnerable (more like women). It is so condescending. When I hear it, I like to quote these posts: One of the most hideous concepts comes under the banner of caring and wanting to help men. Feminists have largely recognized that people don't care much about men who share their emotions or vulnerability. Their solution: Men you have to learn to share your emotions more. You know, the way women do. …
/r/MensRights06/04/18 12:58 PM
2

Link for the lazies https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psN1DORYYV0&t=15m32s But for me the more important part is this at 16:41 till 18min https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psN1DORYYV0&t=16m41s
/r/MensRights06/04/18 11:44 AM
1

Funny how we never get people responding to Mike's positive actions, on the MRA sub, from the same people who often post rubbish about the Tories being no better than The Labour party for men's rights. I noticed this myself even though he is one of the worlds most influential mra's. Two possible reasons. First this sub is a bit US centered and second he is not much of a provocateur anymore. He is more calm and collected and hasn't debated and confronted feminists for some time the way he used to…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 11:34 AM
2

No, I was not when I posted it. I haven't seen it before for free. Though I should have used "currently" instead of now, my mistake.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 11:08 AM
5

So if you're looking for "which 3 pieces of rethoric/naratives do we have to tone down" so as to curb the host's immune reaction to the self-identified parasite named feminism. I'm sorry to say: That won't suffice. lol, thought the same thing. I think those in central or leadership position in the movement must come out and clearly state that any/all kind of man hating is unacceptable and will be followed with consequences and then these consequences must be applied. Problem is, the ones in lead…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 10:51 AM
5

There is a communication gap of some sorts. I would argue there are two kind of people out there, the more logical and the more emotional (right, left; conservative, progressive; you get the point). There is evidence for that too. Where the problem starts is, the first tends to describe reality how it is without judgement or valuation and the second how they wish the world to be because they evaluate it to be the better version. When both clash online, they tend to mischaracterize each other and…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 10:34 AM
10

Oh damn, I forgot about Alexa. But you have to acknowledge that hosting TRP Movie is a step in the right direction. Netflix chose not to. If you watch it, it will only show Amazon that there is a demand for topics like that. Edit: By the way, thank you for your work on archiving posts from shitty sources around here! I once suspected you're a bot because of your consistency!
/r/MensRights05/04/18 09:25 PM
6

Can you elaborate how "symptoms of BPD are consistent with feminist ideology"? why don't we just classify feminism as a mental disorder and treat feminist with medication to eradicate the sense of dilution they feel? Because that would be evil
/r/MensRights05/04/18 09:23 PM
5

How does Amazon stand against everything in that movie? Educate me
/r/MensRights05/04/18 09:15 PM
33

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLzeakKC6fE The woman producing the movie, Cassie Jaye willingly sacrificed her career for doing what she thought was right. In my book, she is a hero.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 09:11 PM
1

You forgot the "/s"
/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:17 PM
1

Introduction in german but the sources in english, lots of studies: https://frauengewalt.wordpress.com/ also lots of studies at http://www.mrarchivist.com/results/?item=&topic=Violence,%20Intimate%20Partner&nation=United%20States (if you need other sources for different countries, you need to make another search with different parameters on www.mrarchivist.com) also see r/mensrightslinks and /r/MRRef
/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:09 PM
3

with an np link like this: https://np.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/89sh9y/the_rise_of_male_supremacist_groups/dwtln61/
/r/MensRights05/04/18 06:26 PM
5

Are you talking about an unborn child?
/r/MensRights05/04/18 06:07 PM
2

Meditation is an excellent idea! It's one of the best tools available to better oneself. Or how about a program to encourage every group member to find a hobby outside of the center, so that when the program ends they still have that other thing going on in their life besides battling their addiction. You could collect and offer ideas and corresponding websites/addresses and speak about their experiences. I like to run, so another idea would be to form a running group. It can be meditative too. …
/r/MensRights05/04/18 05:59 PM
4

Posting a normal link to reddit approved hate subreddits can get r/mensrights into trouble for brigading/harassing and possibly banned
/r/MensRights05/04/18 05:46 PM
6

They are feminists first, and care about men's issues second and only from a feminist angle. They're censorship heavy and anti free speech as you would suspect from a feminist. Look at the menslib ceddit page to see deleted posts: https://www.ceddit.com/r/ MensLib/
/r/MensRights05/04/18 08:25 AM
2

You've just said "fuck" or "damn". You should resign.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 08:02 AM
3

Have a look at this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/877e1b/cmv_it_is_in_fact_males_not_females_that_suffer/dwaw2uw/
/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:52 AM
2

Yes, there are enough women out there who don't think like that. No need to settle for a hypocrite or feminist.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:44 AM
10

I 100% support the free the nipple movement!
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:51 PM
9

NSFW Fuck yeah! /s
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:42 PM
1

Do you feel alienated that this month (April) is Black Women's History Month? Yes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcLj2CVC1VU
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:39 PM
4

For what cult?
/r/MensRights31/03/18 02:03 PM
14

Your‘re right, but please don‘t act like people are excusing a „pervert“ here, they probably didn‘t read about the case like everybody on reddit does not read the article
/r/MensRights31/03/18 01:26 PM
16

You realize this is a place for mens rights, not white male rights, right? Don't let them divide us between racial lines. That's what they aim at. Men's rights stand for every man, black, asian, australian, gay, trans. It shouldn't matter. I get where you're coming from, I really do. We are getting told that white men are the most evil creatures on earth and you want to create a backlash against that. And we're told that over and over by evil bigots. But think for a moment what such a proposal w…
/r/MensRights31/03/18 07:19 AM
1

Agree this is not a men's rights issue. On the contrary it serves as a divide.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 06:21 AM
10

There are many subs with an open feminist agenda. I don't know to what extend each deletes, (except menslib, about 1/3 threads get deleted) but I guess it's the same everywhere. r/menslib /r/offmychest /r/nottheonion /r/TwoXChromosomes /r/bestof and many more I probably forgot about. It is almost a requirement to have this policy to get a default sub.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 07:35 PM
3

Don't forget Philip Davies speech about this topic in the UK in Westminster Hall: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTJ2tlrPFlk&t=23m37s This part of the speech is really good but it's really good in its entirety.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 06:54 PM
23

Had the exact same idea and posted the deleted comments before seeing yours. lol ceddit is a great tool to counter feminist censorship Edit: It's so crazy that it is acceptable in american culture to demand your husband to sleep on the couch and that they always comply. I would laugh at my partner for suggesting it and would never degrade myself like that.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 03:20 PM
21

Look at the censored comments: u/Yamahabb404 Regardless of forgetting the ice cream, why do you let her tell you where to sleep? If you are paying for the house, sleep in your own damn bed! If she wants to throw a hissy fit, she can sleep elsewhere. u/Pepsimaxbeatspepsi Go to your bed you mug. If she wants to sleep on the couch, let her. u/Dartaga Is she pregnant? That I would understand the intense freak out. My last pregnancy I asked my Husband to pick up seedless watermelon for me w hole he w…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 03:09 PM
17

Go Denmark! This is the kind of equality I like, namely equality.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 12:01 PM
6

Fair point, it's still funny if you think about it in the broad context.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 11:19 AM
30

"If only men would talk about their feelings and problems more like women do, maybe they wouldn't kill themselves when they lose their job, kids, wife because of feminist agenda, get punished unfairly by the legal system, get homeless or get bullied in school. And it would be so much easier for me to know which men to subconsciously avoid and never to regard as a romantic partner" /s
/r/MensRights30/03/18 10:31 AM
1

Thanks for digging deeper! Fake stories harm everyone, his is probably not true. I hope the people who offered him help didn't get exploited.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 08:21 AM
83

Feminist sign: "Boys will be boys held to a higher standard" That's a prime example of what feminists advocate for.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 07:27 AM
5

MRA's don't say they advocate to fix issues for both genders. Feminism does while behaving completely contrary to this notion.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 07:08 AM
2

Have you ever supported something for women's rights that is solely for the benefit of women? Probably yes. Feminism has never done or advocated for such a thing the other way. For feminism even fathers rights are more a women's issue than a mens issue to get women more free from the home and more time in the workplace.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 07:02 AM
11

same as mens only golf clubs or bars are totally fine Yeah, but they're not fine. Crazy whiny 3rd wave feminists established these laws and now these whiny feminists whine that they're held to the standards they themselves probably supported. It's not wrong, a "trap" and we're not "becoming what we despise" when we hold people accountable to the laws they put in place to show them how sexist they actually are themselves.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 06:51 AM
12

It wouldn't fly the other way around, so no. Hold them accountable for the same standards as everybody else. On principle I would agree with you though.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 06:41 AM
1

How did you get that impression?
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:59 AM
0

With which point do you not agree?
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:58 AM
2

You're right, accuser is the better word.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:55 AM
63

How are these people allowed to show his picture? Isn't it illegal because of privacy reasons in Ireland too? He is not guilty.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 05:31 PM
159

Remember this?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 05:27 PM
5

I know you're joking but what I would actually say is care for the rape victim accuser as though you believe her/him but investigate/collect evidence in both directions.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 05:23 PM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2gm7ll/domestic_violence_among_lesbian_couples_is_very/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5mjpli/til_the_domestic_violence_rate_in_lesbian/
/r/MensRights29/03/18 05:17 PM
25

I wouldn't trust a cheater to tell the truth. But maybe he is absolutely sure. Who knows
/r/MensRights29/03/18 04:40 PM
1

So you think my characterization of conservatives is not correct?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 04:23 PM
79

Do you think it serves any purpose to tell him that his daughter might not even be his because his wife left after she cheated on him and that he should demand a test? Or is this not a good idea for a suicidal person?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 04:22 PM
1

because...
/r/MensRights29/03/18 02:58 PM
4

There was a case in Germany where a man was not hired because the employer wanted more women, the man sued in the EU courts. The courts had no problems with this despite the wording of the EU rights. Do you have a link for that, or more information for me to search for?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 02:22 PM
5

Its strange to see both sides. I just wanted to tell you that women and mra's are not on opposite sites on this issue. So your mother being denied because of her sex is not the other (the mra) side. MRA's want fair opportunity and competition for everyone, nothing more.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 01:46 PM
6

That's not both sides at all. Because that is not what the mra side stands for. This is a strawman argument. Nobody here advocates for higher thresholds for women.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 01:16 PM
2

Feminism =/= women
/r/MensRights29/03/18 11:04 AM
2

Are you really a high risk taking person if you're just to stupid to foresee the potential consequences? I learned that courage was not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. The brave man is not he who does not feel afraid, but he who conquers that fear. If they are not self-aware they're not brave, they're stupid. And we allow these morons to run parts of our society.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 11:03 AM
27

Yes, they try to taint and associate pillars of our civilization, things like "innocent until proven guilty" or "free speech" as bad and right wing. We live in crazy times
/r/MensRights29/03/18 10:58 AM
29

#metoo
/r/MensRights29/03/18 10:53 AM
90

Falsely accused are "victims" too. They need to be protected. We need to get this message across
/r/MensRights29/03/18 10:35 AM
73

Simply a horrorstory. I hope the kids didn't really suffer during their short life as much as it sounds like. Conservatives: "This is evidence that allowing gay people to marry and adopt kids was a mistake." Feminism: "This is somehow mens fault and because of the patriarchy and internalized misogyny." Regressives Progressives: "They obviously suffered because of heteronormativity. As you can see from how they used their kids for their own virtue signaling their activism they were a wonderful fa…
/r/MensRights29/03/18 10:27 AM
20

Step 1: Use the women-only-compartments. Step 2: Get asked to leave the compartments by authorities because something something wrong genitals Step 3: Document this Step 4: Sue at the European Court of Human Rights Step 5: Profit
/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:53 AM
1

It worked for one side till today, hasn't it? and Feminism blames men. MRA's blame feminism. See the difference?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:10 AM
1

Thanks and keep up the good work! Do you believe in patriarchy theory?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 06:58 AM
15

Of course Cosmopolitan embodies internalized misogyny... is what a post modern feminist would say.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 07:44 PM
2

In germany and the UK hate speech laws have not changed within the last decade. That's not true. At least for germany. There has been the "Netzwerkdurchsuchungsgesetz". It is aimed at social media platform and promised to punish them harshly when they host hateful comments. Of course they preemptively obey this law and delete everything they deem to controversial. What this law was actually aimed at was getting back it's lost high ground from "right wing" agenda by deleting everything thats agai…
/r/MensRights28/03/18 02:37 PM
1

Don't do this. Ask your manager to do this or mediate between both of you. Don't confront a coworker yourself
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:59 PM
3

What does it mean when cops tell you not to contact her in the UK? Is it legally binding? How did you get in contact with the police? There is to much information missing in this story. As others said, don't contact her at all, even when she tries to reach you. Safe all old contact information you have. Contact a lawyer
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:55 PM
6

That said, it sounds to me like you need to be doing some introspection. I understand what it is like to hold unpopular opinions/worldviews passionately, but since you say youre not welcome in your own student union and are getting the brush off from administrators (apparently after making threats to go to lawyers and police) perhaps your style and approach to people is not working for you. None of this seems like really too much for you to have just ignored and moved on in spite of. Hope you wi…
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:50 PM
0

Really no offense, but this is one of the most negative interpretations of such a harmless positive message I've ever seen. But I guess this is what being bombarded constantly by hate does to you, watch out for yourself to not get to bitter around here.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:38 PM
2

Boys disadvantage in education and them dropping out of college. See /r/mensrightslinks or /r/MRRef for corresponding studies
/r/MensRights27/03/18 08:06 PM
2

Do you personally want to see a world in which we can joke about women too or one in which nobody can ever make a joke about gender again?
/r/MensRights27/03/18 08:00 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZTOT6DKfZ8
/r/MensRights27/03/18 07:04 AM
9

But with regard to biology. Essentially, men's purpose is genetic variation. More boys are born than girls, to give those girls a range to choose from ie pick the best to stay in the gene pool, whilst the others die and are removed from the gene pool. Beyond that, men aren't necessary. That isn't new to many in the manosphere and not offensive, it's just reality and human nature. At least from my perspective. Evolutionary biology is used a lot to counter feminist arguments around here. That this…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 06:44 PM
5

Studies suggest it's mostly women who inculcate this behavior, as do mens anecdotal experiences. Do you know where to find this study?
/r/MensRights26/03/18 03:59 PM
6

its 50% nature and 50% nurture Maybe, I thought that too. But maybe it varies between certain behaviors. Do you have any interesting sources on that topic? it wouldn't helpful for your movement, for reasons that I think will just make everyone butthurt. Please offend me, I want to hear your argument.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 03:57 PM
11

For example the idea men shouldn't cry or show emotion. Sometimes its reinforced by women, more often than not its men. Men don't get anything from showing emotions or crying. As a woman, you may not understand that, I don't know, but for many women, being a victim can be an asset, for men it's the opposite. If women would procreate with men who cry or show emotion more often, the whole world would cry. Relevant: Stop saying ‘men need to talk more’ How many times have you heard “if only men talk…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 03:08 PM
7

Feminists don't want equal rights, there is a tremendous amount of evidence it's morphed into a female supremacy movement. We are already past the point of equal rights for women. Feminists =/= Women There are still legitimate women's issues, but feminism is doing more harm than good, even for women.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 10:31 AM
28

Not having had a female president isn't evidence of oppression. It may be, but all the evidence indicates it isn't. Equating men not getting treated fair in courts with not having had a female president is a ridiculous comparison to begin with. I agree though that both men and women have struggles which need to be addressed. In this sub, we discuss issues men face. And I consider them to be much more important in todays time.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 09:50 AM
12

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7JzdcZPvzg
/r/MensRights26/03/18 09:45 AM
11

From /u/kaian-a-coel The bailey is "masculinity is toxic". Aka men are inherently bad. It's indefensible, but ideologically valuable. The motte is "some men are bad people in some ways". Completely unattackable, but also worthless. Because really, what's the point of calling a subset of bad behaviours "toxic masculinity" if not to attack masculinity as a whole? If I called city-gang behaviour "toxic blackness", or infanticide "toxic femininity", that would be seen as a racist attack on all black…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 09:32 AM
15

From r/mensrightslinks: We find that the most important effects come from the interplay between student and teacher gender. Male students tend to bet less when assessed by a female teacher than by an external examiner or by a male teacher. This is consistent with female teachers' grading practices; female teachers give lower grades to male students. [..] The gender results show that students' beliefs tend to increase the gender gap in investment and effort. A male teacher increases the effort an…
/r/MensRights23/03/18 07:17 PM
1

lol thx
/r/MensRights18/03/18 10:07 PM
0

Because the study will get published in November.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 10:13 AM
8

Found it: https://www.reddit.com/r/FeMRADebates/comments/49wh6i/defending_boys_in_a_girl_power_age/d0vji18/
/r/MensRights18/03/18 09:30 AM
24

“An anti-discrimination law that affords special protection for women but also allows men to garner the same protection under the same law is absurd and illogical. Wow
/r/MensRights18/03/18 09:26 AM
1

What do you want to tell me with that? Intelligent women are not typically physically attractive. This sentence is not true. Because intelligence is correlated with attractiveness. So.. Single intelligent women are not typically physically attractive We are talking about two different things. There is an objective measurement for beauty. And on that measurement, intelligent people rank also higher. How attractive men perceive women to be AFTER they talked to her and deemed her intelligent means …
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:56 AM
5

I hope you didn't change your mind. Because this is just another mischaracterizing hit piece reading just from the first paragraphs.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:54 AM
4

Men are threatened by intelligent women, study finds No that is not what the study finds! The men ranked a woman who outscored them as a more desirable partner, with the study stating that “men formed favourable impressions and showed greater interest in women who displayed more (versus less) intelligence than themselves.” So they ARE attracted to intelligent women... However, the second part of the study – when men were asked if they would date such a woman in real life – showed that the men go…
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:36 AM
2

Intelligence is correlated with attractiveness. Yes, life is unfair https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201012/beautiful-people-really-are-more-intelligent
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:12 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9mkA1GBY2k It is an epidemic, the tyranny of the minority.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 09:50 PM
14

Not in Femradebates.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 08:49 PM
3

I am not able to comment as I am banned in this sub. It is a feminist safe space that banns dissent. Fortunately, the first comment gives a good advice in general, but I would be surprised if the whole thread is not deleted for some random reason.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 02:11 PM
5

What a great blogpost! Awesome
/r/MensRights17/03/18 02:05 PM
3

This is worrying
/r/MensRights17/03/18 02:01 PM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_EIHqofzN0&t=1m09s
/r/MensRights17/03/18 01:59 PM
2

Diversified
/r/MensRights17/03/18 08:54 AM
6

Thats interesting. Where do you live where this is illegal? In my region it's not. And is it enforced? If it's not enforced, is it really illegal?
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:45 AM
15

Besides murder, domestic abuse, emotional manipulation, sexual assault, fraudulent claims of abuse, shall I go on? most evil legal thing
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:31 AM
3

Don't forget Philip Davies speech about this topic in Westminster Hall: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhDwzds-49s&t=10s
/r/MensRights16/03/18 10:02 AM
1

And you think that's more important than fighting for those actual oppressed minorities. That's some cowardly shit there. Women are not a minority. Women are the majority of people in the US. And you're currently justifying the racist sexist oppression of the minority of men by saying it's not that important. You're blind to your own bigotry. And you think that's more important than fighting for those actual oppressed minorities. That's some cowardly shit there. Show us proof for that oppression…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 09:37 AM
12

No it wouldn't be wrong. Crazy people like feminist think its wrong. Kissing or hugging other people is a normal human behavior. Kissing or hugging another person doesn't has to be sexual. What's wrong is the double standard and I'm sure that's what you blame with this post. And if we have to start holding women up to the same standards feminists and culture currently established solely for men, I'm all for it if it results in a reversal of this harmful trend.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 09:19 AM
28

That's the most evil legal thing a woman can do to a man.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 09:13 AM
6

Men's rights are for all men, including white men. She is discriminating against all men because she prefers to hire women. She is discriminating against white men because she prefers to hire black people. Both of these things are illegal. She is openly racist and sexist. Is this really so difficult to see?
/r/MensRights16/03/18 07:55 AM
1

You can't get to equity for all You can't get to equity period. It's an unachievable goal. We already had the best system possible, namely don't divide people into groups but judge on an individual basis. Because you know what? The smallest minority is the individual, we already had it right. And the ideology you're arguing for is ruining it.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 07:39 AM
2

Well you're factually wrong. Because there are practises of FGM which are much more harmless than MGM. The numbers on that are difficult to get. There is Female Genital Mutilation Type I a, classified by the WHO, which is the removal of the clitoral hood. The clitoral hood develops into the foreskin in male fetus. So FGM Type I a for a girl is what circumcision is for a boy. It is the same bodypart on different genders. The medical term for female mutilation type 1 a is literally "circumcision" …
/r/MensRights16/03/18 07:36 AM
2

I don't think it's a repost because you linked to another article. I just posted the link because I made the argument, that it's right she got aquitted of murder. She should have been tried for manslaughter.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 08:25 PM
2

Archive: http://archive.is/zJEIQ
/r/MensRights15/03/18 12:00 PM
3

Yes, it is stupid. Do you want to change it, or "just" rant about it? Don't get me wrong, both is fine, you just need to let people know how they can help you. Your project actually sounds really interesting, and I'm impressed that you're able to do that. Wish I would've been encouraged to build such things in school. All the best!
/r/MensRights15/03/18 11:57 AM
1

Want to know why there is a gap on the 10-19 years mark? That is usually the time women choose to get kids around the age of 30 nowadays.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 11:44 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/849qqb/woman_fatally_shoots_someone_fleeing_despite/dvofra9/
/r/MensRights15/03/18 11:37 AM
1

I see it with my own sister and mother who think its funny to make jokes about the fact Im unhappy with myself because I struggle with self esteem and mental health that causes me to verbally lash out in anger from time because of the bitterness I have towards women.[..] My own mother and sister would rather NAWALT me constantly than actually listen to what I have to say. They would rater defend women they have never met and never will meet than help formulate my thought and feelings because I '…
/r/MensRights15/03/18 11:36 AM
2

Many feminists not only don't appreciate it, they are even vile about it. #masculinitysofragile, male... tears etc. they'll say it's in a different context, but actually it's not. They react in this way to men opening up about their problems, though it's men as a whole.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 09:25 AM
2

How to File a Title IX Sexual Harassment or Assault Complaint with the U.S. Department of Education Make sure you have all the evidence prepared. If you come into contact with the school and they deny your request, make sure to have their statement in written form so you can use it as evidence. If you can't and live in a one party consent state in the US, make sure to have a voice recorder on you and record the interactions, transcribe it afterwards. If you can't, transcribe what was said to you…
/r/MensRights15/03/18 08:06 AM
65

You wish. These people will get positions later in life as the diversity chief of human resources in every company
/r/MensRights14/03/18 03:56 PM
2

For the most part, they've fostered their shit behind closed doors, in a bubble they erected, and this is the first time they get to test their theories against 'the public'. And, like most radicals, they'll find that their theories have little to no traction, and actually invite a hefty pile of dissent, negative stigma and opposition. Only the most truly ludicrous ideologues survive that harsh lesson plan. I see a problem there. This radical neo marxist ideology, to which the current branch of …
/r/MensRights14/03/18 03:51 PM
4

Good point. Giving it another thought, if I would advocate for the closing of that club, I wouldn't be any better than the feminist preventing mens clubs from opening.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 03:29 PM
1

Had the same thought at the beginning. But if they had disrupted it violently, the article would have been completely different. It would be out of character for a free speech club to behave and discuss in a disrespectful manner.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 03:25 PM
24

How does the number of people employed or the influence they have justify supporting that radical manhating ideology? They're getting so comfortable in their safe space with their bullshit agenda that they're actively advertising for radicalism out in the open. And you're downplaying it.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 03:15 PM
40

Stop saying ‘men need to talk more’ How many times have you heard “if only men talked more, or were more like women, there’d be no problem?” Or worse, men don’t talk because of “toxic masculinity?” Both these unhelpful approaches blame men, and fundamentally miss the point that we don’t need to change the way men talk, we need to change the way we listen to men – and talk to them on their terms. Worse, if we place the onus on men to self-present to current care provision (which they are half as …
/r/MensRights14/03/18 03:06 PM
1

It's more manslaughter than murder https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/849qqb/woman_fatally_shoots_someone_fleeing_despite/dvofra9/
/r/MensRights14/03/18 12:45 PM
3

nearly 20 percent of all American boys will be diagnosed with ADHD This is pure madness and idiocracy and makes me so sad. Millions of lifes will be ruined by this. A lost generation of boys.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 12:40 PM
1

From the update: His approach is by design slower and much more involved than the current state-of-the-art diagnostic [..] Pelham's approach is also probably more expensive, and a lot harder. So it won't happen then. Part of this problem is the money involved in giving those drugs out.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 12:39 PM
2

Yes, I agree with you. Happy to say that i am the reason why we finally have male suicide, health and education issues highlighted in our public policy! Wow, thanks for doing this! It needs a special kind of person to argue against the current zeitgeist! It's right that you're proud of this!
/r/MensRights14/03/18 11:52 AM
2

Truly "one of a kind". Awesome! I have a question for this community. If this were the other way around and it would read A ONE OF A KIND SPACE FOR YOUNG MOTHERS AND THEIR FAMILIES Wouldn't this sub be up in arms against it? Arguing that there are no groups for fathers? Until what percentage of groups being for fathers is it okay for us to celebrate this? I mean, I love this and am happy about it. There is so much support for young mothers and almost zero for fathers. This is necessary, don't ge…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:58 AM
5

Intent: In terms of willfulness, first degree murderers must have the specific intent to end a human life. This intent does not necessarily have to correspond to the actual victim. A murder in which the killer intends to kill but kills the wrong person or a random person would still constitute first degree murder. Furthermore, under many state laws, killing through action showing a depraved indifference to human life can qualify as murder in the first degree. Deliberation and Premeditation: Whet…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:41 AM
10

"Men are incarcerated because they commit more crimes. That's not a “disadvantage”. That’s a consequence of actions they CHOOSE. Have you been to prison? Why or why not? Others made the point already quite good. The research and statistics are crystal clear, if men would be detained, arrested and incarcerated at the same rate as women for the same crime, prisons would be empty. Women outlive men because of genetics. It’s true across all socioeconomic classes, races and cultures. So it’s not a “d…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:17 AM
13

Feminism is not doing enough for men’s rights Not only has feminism not done enough, feminism has never done anything solely for the benefit of men. But I am open to new facts to change this opinion. It's just I haven't ever seen anything done by feminists, which isn't mainly for the benefit of women.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 09:18 AM
10

The discussion was hosted by the AMS Sexual Assault Support Centre (SASC). From the sound of it, their discussion, hosted as part of the centre’s Healthier Masculinities program, was only about the feminist framework. The FSC felt invited and probably made it clear that they were not pleased with the centers feminist approach on mens health. It sounds like they voiced their opinion respectfully as you would expect from a free speech club, but the SASC took offense in them daring to have another …
/r/MensRights14/03/18 09:09 AM
17

Sounds like they did not "crash" it, but just visited the discussion and took part in it. Just not with the opinion the hosts would like them to have. Tough luck. “The problem is that a lot of men today are emasculated,” said Alter. “... Not because there’s an expected masculine role that they should fill but but more so because they want to fit into a masculine role, but society doesn’t let them.” I 100% support their message. As feminist ideology prohibits/discourages women from taking the cla…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 08:55 AM
5

Good point
/r/MensRights13/03/18 06:51 PM
8

I think we need to be consistant. That's exactly what I'm trying to be. Hold me to the standards I demand from feminists. By your standard we shouldn't be talking about Harvey Weinstein, who isn't even charged with a felony. Maybe, I don't know. Edit: Well of course we can talk about it. But the picture of somebody accused, and his or her name shouldn't be published.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 05:20 PM
13

Police Chief Patrick Kreis told the Chicago Tribune, “The investigation is still ongoing and fluid What happened to innocent until proven guilty? Let's wait for the court verdict. Her picture shouldn't be shown until she is convicted. What do you think?
/r/MensRights13/03/18 04:52 PM
37

As much as I despise the UK for going full authoritarian left wing state, this has nothing to do with mens rights
/r/MensRights13/03/18 02:56 PM
8

Yes, play nice - or at least lucid, sensible, and not full of hatred for all things female May I ask how you got the impression that mra's are full of hatred for all things female? That again, is a straw man argument. Do you perhaps make the mistake of equating feminists with women? I believe that MRA sites being listed among toxic sites doesn't help us change the world. Those listings are unfounded and pure bigotry. It's not that mra's are the problem, it's that those doing the listing are not …
/r/MensRights12/03/18 06:11 PM
16

So calling women cunts, whores, thots, etc.and taking every example of a single woman doing something questionable as proof of awalt - that's hurting what needs to be a nation-wide movement. Who does that? That's a straw man argument for mra's. Really, one of the best ways for feminists to weaken MRAs would be to post outrageous misogynous essays at MRA sites. It wouldn't surprise me if that's a regular occurrence. The best way for feminists to weaken MRA's would be to help men themself solely f…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 04:54 PM
2

MRAs and the MRM aren't taken seriously. I don't think that the use of overly dramatic statements or even humour is going to help humanize MRAs or forward the movement. I don't believe that any of the statements in your post would promote meaningful discussion. I honestly think to the listener it discredits anything you say afterwards. Then why has Paul Elam and A Voice For Men provoked the making of a whole movie about the mens rights movement with articles like this? October is the fifth annua…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 03:47 PM
6

I think you made the mistake of taking some phrases to seriously. That's why I mentioned "Sentences which are short, precise and have either some comical value" at the beginning of my post. I wish the gender-pay-gap was real Why would you want a gender pay gap? That sentence serves two purposes. First, it's funny because it's taking the idea of a pay-gap ad absurdum and second it's implying that there is no real gender pay gap. The future next hitler is female Unless you're some kind of psychic …
/r/MensRights12/03/18 12:22 PM
5

Aziz Ansari
/r/MensRights12/03/18 11:25 AM
7

Do you think calling him a deranged person helps him to understand the fault of his argument? If yes, then ok go for it. But I don't think it does. What do you think?
/r/MensRights12/03/18 10:33 AM
9

History is written by the victors
/r/MensRights12/03/18 08:19 AM
14

Like seriously, why is this? Because men put up with it. Just don't, walk away, and move on to find someone who doesn't care about those things? One of the greatest powers a man has, is the ability to just walk away.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 10:06 PM
13

Has she been in the public before, is her identity confirmed? She sounds like a troll account
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:57 PM
35

I had a chat with a feminist some days ago, who tried to defend the term mansplaining as correct. She posted 3 links, which she argued should serve as evidence that mansplaining is a thing. One of the links included a study which actually came up with the same as the one you posted. It read: Recent research, though, suggests that the most important variable is not the sex of the person doing the talking, but that of the person being spoken to So she posted a link as evidence which actually contr…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:49 PM
3

I 100% agree with you that using "toxic masculinity" is toxic. But... does that mean that men cannot talk about women's issues, because we "have absolutely no idea what being masculine feminine is like" too? I disagree with that. Women can talk about mens issues and the other way around. Understanding what others go through is called empathy, humans are capable of doing that. Calling something "toxic masculinity" is not empathic empathetic though.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 06:03 PM
2

The following is a very informed and highly reusable comment by Karen Straughan in response to a feminist who thinks the many blatant sexists among feminists aren't real feminists: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousand…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:32 PM
3

Yes, because in every other aspect that affect women, feminists know how important the right language is. They complain about words like, chairman, fireman or humankind. Only when it comes to men, they suddenly don't care anymore about how inclusive and careful language to describe men. You have to think about how feminists think language creates and influences reality and how they use terms like mansplaining, -spreading, toxic masculinity, patriarchy, feminism etc. It's deliberateness.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:27 PM
2

No, you got it backwards. Men don't cry because nobody gives a shit about a weak, crying man. There are no woman that find a crying weak man more attractive. There is no society that cares about weak men. The world is only interested in strong, tough, responsible men. If you teach men to be weak, you will set them up for failure in life. But start teaching women to sleep with weak men, and you will see how quickly men's behavior will change. And if that proposition sounds "misogynist" to you, yo…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:09 PM
2

If we would start banning people for differing opinions, we would end up like the feminism sub. The mods here are as far from feminist shills as it gets.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:58 PM
19

This movie is the best introduction into the mens rights movement for a feminist there is
/r/MensRights10/03/18 08:31 AM
1

When you reject reality it’s very difficult to find a good solution to a problem
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:47 PM
2

To be fair though, any time I've taken a feminist issue like... How badly rape victims are treated by the court system when they go to trial, so many legitimate rape victims are scared to come forward and press charges.. In my mind a totally valid problem - Yes. But its a difficult topic. Because every time you encourage girls to come forward and make it easier by adjust due process, you end up also making it easier to make a false rape accusations. And the numbers are rising. And I've had MRA m…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 08:36 AM
3

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=%2Fm%2F05dgd_
/r/MensRights09/03/18 08:24 AM
7

They have: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=%2Fm%2F05dgd_ Unfortunately people only search for "International Men's day" when it's international women's day
/r/MensRights09/03/18 08:20 AM
1

To be fair, I had some good arguments in this thread. Even expended my opinion on one topic. And the person talking about brainwashed sexist even apologized in a way: I agree, and definitely didn't mean to aim any insults your way my dude. I really appreciate how civil the majority of these replies to my comments have been. Happy holidays boys!
/r/MensRights09/03/18 08:14 AM
1

The hate I got came all from outsiders because the corresponding thread reached the front page. What this means is, that they were 100% either feminists or conservatives. Both equally hate mra's. The subreddit gets toxic when outsiders come in. If you have important things to say about mens rights, stick to it and be the change you want to see. I'm not going to stop posting in this sub only because I was called a cunt.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 08:12 AM
3

When the mens rights argument started, it was a small branch of feminism. But feminism wouldn't have any of it. They simply didn't allowed it and tried to shut the mra argument down. Read about the history of Erin Pizzey and Warren Farrell. And no, feminists and mras won't go along as long as feminism believes in a conspiracy theory like patriarchy, because that is the fundamental to their ideology which is faulty to begin with. I agree with the other points the video makes though.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 08:08 AM
1

Angela Confidential = theothermod confirmed!
/r/MensRights09/03/18 07:55 AM
7

Of course, just have a look what people felt the need to call me today: CUNT https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/82vpnl/we_at_mensrights_would_like_to_celebrate/dvdz6dr/?context=3 You losers don't speak for me. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/82vpnl/we_at_mensrights_would_like_to_celebrate/dvdlz4m/ Oh, you poor man. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/82vpnl/we_at_mensrights_would_like_to_celebrate/dvdpvng/ Try an actual dictionary definition and not a reddit post …
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:44 PM
1

In game theory and economic theory, a zero-sum game is a mathematical representation of a situation in which each participant's gain or loss of utility is exactly balanced by the losses or gains of the utility of the other participants. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-sum_game But I see what you mean from your example. A woman giving more access to their children to a good father is a win-win situation, because they gain more time, a more happy and responsible child and a better relationship …
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:02 PM
1

Thanks for contributing to the discussion instead of just downvoting. I want to explain my point on the topics you touched. Women need more workplace rights and protection from sexual harassment and violence. We don't have to make men have less of these to increase them for women. Every time you give a woman more rights in a sexual assault case, you give a criminal woman more leverage to falsely accuse a man of said crime and make him less able to defend himself -> Zero sum game. Men need more f…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:22 PM
11

To be fair, the guy seems to have visited the sub in good faith, at least it seems like that in the linked thread. He is actually interested in discussion. Even though he sees everything through the feminist lens. That's why I don't know why he is misrepresenting the things said to him in such a dishonest way. I don't think any encouragement to suicide would get any support here, not in the slightest.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:11 PM
64

You're talking about this post? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/80qg4u/ive_seen_this_on_a_few_pages_recently_and_i_was/ I couldn't find the things you were talking about, nobody called you an idiot. You were just shut down for the usual toxic feminist talking points you were using. Where is the proof of someone encouraging you to commit suicide? The Menslib sub is so deep up feminisms ass, it's ridiculous, you can't even talk about circumcision over there. The most important mens ri…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 04:20 PM
6

I don't see anything wrong with treating others with the same amount of respect/dignity that they give to you. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. But your starting point should be to give them the benefit of the doubt at the start of every interaction and treat them how you want to be treated. You have to have a look at this "game": http://ncase.me/trust/ It's really awesome!! and explores why tit for tat is a good way to go in life when you have all the information available. Edit: Fo…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 04:06 PM
6

Lets be honest, women cant survive without men and men cant survive without women I agree. I like the attitude of the most famous mra: http://izquotes.com/quotes-pictures/quote-all-women-s-issues-are-to-some-degree-men-s-issues-and-all-men-s-issues-are-to-some-degree-women-s-warren-farrell-60385.jpg Instead of bitching about feminists or redpillers or extremes. Well, I'll continue to call out feminists, or redpillers for their bullshit. You have no other choice if you want to genuinely stand up …
/r/MensRights08/03/18 04:02 PM
11

I appreciate that you believe men and women are equal, I do the same. I made the experience, over and over and over, that feminism doesn't stand for that. I've heard their points over and over and over, the same you're using. It's nothing new to me, I've heard all their arguments before and refuted them over and over and over. And here I am, arguing that I don't agree with the notion that there is a patriarchy and that women are oppressed by men. Let's just leave it at that we both wish for men …
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:58 PM
6

It's not just you. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/82w4m4/its_international_womens_day/
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:52 PM
13

What kind of inequalities do men face from women the law, society, feminists? FTFY, read the sidebar
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:51 PM
10

There it is. This sub is a god damn joke. You losers don't speak for me. Yes, there it is indeed. The usual insults
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:50 PM
12

There is a pinned post at the top about a fundraising for a circumcision movie in the making: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/82jon6/circumcision_documentary_goal_reached_thank_you/ There is activism all the time
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:48 PM
1

This doesn't relate to the point made at all
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:41 PM
2

Listen and believe stand in direct contrast to a men's right for due process in a rape case. I don't get your point, what does this crazy feminist have to do with my point?
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:40 PM
21

Try an actual dictionary definition and not a reddit post by some brainwashed sexist. Take your echo chamber elsewhere Insults don't make good arguments. You know people usually start using insults when they ran out of arguments. The only actual echo chamber I know of is the feminism subreddit, where you get simply banned for opposing opinions. Your post is still here, so it can't be that bad of an echo chamber. (It's not a reddit post btw, it's a commentary in the guardian) Edit: You could refu…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:30 PM
11

The only reason this sub exists, is because feminists don't believe in equal rights of the genders. If they did r/mensrights wouldn't be necessary. Feminism is not for equality, the clue is in the name
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:11 PM
2

They both do. Don't trust mainstream media. All they care about is ratings, money and power. Tucker is doing a good job at calling out regressive left propaganda though.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:08 PM
3

Possible. If you look at the metrics: http://redditmetrics.com/r/mensrights you can see that there hasn't been any significant influx of members when incels was banned
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:46 PM
17

Think about what would happen if everyone behaved the same as you.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:41 PM
-3

Feminists and feminism aren't the same entity either. I disagree, feminists believe in the patriarchy, which is a flawed theory to begin with. I have never seen a feminist who doesn't believe in that conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:41 PM
8

they're an excuse by feminists to bitch on television and radio about how oppressed they are. That's a fair point. But feminists will bitch about anything regardless. I'm sure though that no one on the outside subs will take the opportunity to use this attitude of claiming I'm incel though, hopefully humanity hasn't sunk that low. No, they would never do such a thing.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:28 PM
4

Would you like to explain your "reasoning"?
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:17 PM
1

So no one trying to argue my point, only downvotes? Don't get me wrong, I want it to be an non zero sum game and am willing to listen to anyones argument to change my mind on that.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:09 PM
-4

Oh thank you, what a nice thing to say about a person you don't know anything about. Happy women's day :)
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:37 PM
11

Can you give some examples you dislike?
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:25 PM
-5

Yes sure, I love women. But this post doesn't give any good reasons, it gives the most bad reason, "celebrating it to not be seen as anti-women".
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:19 PM
-7

That's a shitty reason. "Celebrating" it to be seen as to not hate women? That sounds a lot like virtue signaling to me.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:18 PM
-30

I wasn't aware of your post, and made one myself. So would you like to explain why you celebrate international women's day, or is it just important for the world to see your virtue? What is your message?
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:33 PM
-4

More rights for me doesn't imply fewer rights for thee. That's simply not true. Mothers rights almost always weigh against fathers rights for example. Or giving women the right to make anonymous accusations in dv cases, gives men lesser chances to defend themselves. It is a zero sum game. Even though I don't like therapyfortherapy attitude in this post not, he is right with this point.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:28 PM
3

I agree with you. If you want to appreciate something, then just do that. Don't go and say "Ha, see I'm appreciating which makes me better than you."
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:22 PM
14

Thanks Tucker! Edit: Make sure to see the interview with Jordan Peterson that ran after that introduction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1596&v=hGagBqCe3VI&t=34m28s
/r/MensRights08/03/18 09:08 AM
2

Share your emotions like a woman - but deal with the negative consequences like a man!
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:57 PM
2

Men are stronger in general, and therefor more dangerous. Or not? Or should there be a risk assessment on an individual level? Also. Security levels are dependent on sentence length, due to men being unconstitutionally and illegally given longer sentences for the same crimes, this means males are further less eligible for lower security prisons then a female that does the same crime and has the same risk assessment done by the prison system is. That needs to change though. Women should get the s…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:14 PM
8

Perfect Edit: At the people who are downvoting this right now, why?
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:03 PM
1

You make the mistake of thinking I disagree with the tendency of your post, which I don't. I agree with you on most thinks. That's the difference between a real person like me & you & him & a lot of the Bozos on this sub who have never even had a job & still live with their mothers. Get out & investigate the REAL world some day & learn about it. And this sentence is why I don't waste any more time discussing with you. I don't know anything about you and you not about me.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:15 PM
8

Interesting how people are branding her as conservative right wing again only because she doesn't go completely bonkers
/r/MensRights05/03/18 08:19 PM
1

I don't know actually, and I don't know her, maybe you're right. Maybe it's my projection that I interpret her in that way.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 02:51 PM
1

There is a study that shows that men are more reliable in their decision making when they are in a stressful situation
/r/MensRights03/03/18 02:49 PM
1

I'm told "Keine eine Einzelpersonen" means "no single persons" Yeah that's correct. And you're correct, the woman in the audio file speaks of "no single persons" which should include women. So all other sources either got everything wrong, or they got another statement from her.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:10 PM
2

No you're wrong, the majority of migrants in germany got not accepted for asylum.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:38 PM
3

You described the situation perfectly. They'd rather chose to discriminate against men than against foreigners as being branded a nazi is regarded as worst crime. Another food bank from the Tafel in another city chose to discriminate against migrants and they had to endure heavy criticism from politicians and the media. Their cars have been vandalized too: https://www1.wdr.de/nachrichten/ruhrgebiet/nazi-schriftzuege-essener-tafel-100~_v-gseapremiumxl.jpg
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:37 PM
1

I heard german media report "no single men" Edit: focus.de writes: Tafel in Marl rejects single men (https://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/schon-seit-monaten-nicht-nur-in-essen-auch-tafel-in-marl-weist-auslaendische-maenner-ab_id_8544794.html) welt.de writes: For capacity reasons, no single men would generally be admitted for the time being. (https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article174086327/Tafel-in-Marl-Aufnahmestopp-gilt-nicht-nur-fuer-Auslaender-Verwirrung-um-Beschluss.html) and ta…
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:25 PM
17

in fact it’s a great minority that file false reports. Unfortunately this is not necessarily true, german experts on the topic: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stuttgarter-zeitung.de%2Finhalt.vergewaltigung-oder-nicht-unschuldig-auf-der-anklagebank.2493a3cf-12db-4b64-afb8-5d7c3992699d.html&edit-text= Another german police woman did investigate that up to 8 from 10 accusations made to the police don't hold up to scrutiny (german …
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:19 PM
11

As for brain damage, i see far more entrenched stupidity in women than i do in men. There are more, more stupid men than women. But there are also more highly intelligent men than women. The deviance of IQ in men is just higher. The average IQ of men and women is about the same. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_intelligence
/r/MensRights02/03/18 11:28 AM
14

Take a look around over there, read some, and consider using them when making your point whenever possible
/r/MensRights02/03/18 11:15 AM
1

Take a look around over there, read some, and consider using them when making your point whenever possible
/r/MensRights02/03/18 11:11 AM
2

I don't think we'll get men to organize in a way which benefits only men in the near future. Such a march needs to be framed in a way which aims to benefit kids. Like for example a march against infant male genital mutilation, or that kids have a right to their fathers (for fathers rights). Men like to protect women and children, not other men. It's in our nature (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491274) In Experiment 1, only women (not men) showed cognitive balance among in-group bias, ide…
/r/MensRights02/03/18 10:56 AM
6

Yes, being a reactionary movement is like not being a movement at all. Why? And the mrm didn't start as a reactionary movement. The MRM being in direct protest to feminism says a lot. Yes, it says a lot about feminism. MRA's are for women's rights and for women having all possibilities that men have. The mrm tried to be feminisms kind little brother demanding recognition for 50 years. It didn't work, look where we ended up.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:42 AM
5

We need to adjust our language to focus on our issues using facts and studies, and stop couching our complaints within complaints about feminism. This was tried for 50 years. Didn't work. I agree with using facts and studies but I don't agree with adjusting our language. On the contrary we need to get more aggressive and uncomfortable for the establishment.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:37 AM
7

Because the man in mansplainomg refers to the higher respect given to(in this aspect) masculinity in our society. Your own cited study exactly disproves that. Here again: both men and women are more likely to interrupt and to use dependent clauses when speaking with a woman than with a man. (https://newrepublic.com/article/117757/gender-language-differences-women-get-interrupted-more) And even if it was not the case. It's totally unnecessary because there are woman who behave exactly like those …
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:21 AM
5

They don't even only want female supremacy. As they showed time and time again, they want female supremacy with women who agree with them.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:11 AM
6

Let me "mansplain" this to you. Your first study actually refutes that there is something like mansplaining, because: Recent research, though, suggests that the most important variable is not the sex of the person doing the talking, but that of the person being spoken to. According to a paper published Sunday in the online edition of the Journal of Language and Social Psychology, both men and women are more likely to interrupt and to use dependent clauses when speaking with a woman than with a m…
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:05 AM
1

I agree with the tendency you described at the top. It's true, men tend to read more information based, scientific, political, non-fictional texts, and women like to read more fictional books etc. Though women read more in general, they also tend to read more of certain genres and less of others. A 2007 NPR article reported that women account for eighty percent of the fiction market. Men, in contrast, have been reported to read more nonfiction, the most popular topics being history, politics, an…
/r/MensRights02/03/18 08:48 AM
2

She is supporting our message, and that's what counts. Or not?
/r/MensRights02/03/18 07:57 AM
3

Women can absolutely be funny, it's just that the majority doesn't has to. Hitchens said it best
/r/MensRights01/03/18 05:18 PM
14

Destroying it is the wrong way. You don't reach anybody with that. There are better ways to counter this message in a creative way. For example by hanging your own paper near it explaining why its shit. Lame example, but you get the point.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 04:21 PM
6

If you just destroy what they create, even if its total bigotry, this makes you not much better than these people: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0&t=1m53s
/r/MensRights01/03/18 04:18 PM
19

The problem is that feminists create sexist words like mansplaining, -spreading etc. when on the other hand they fight tooth and nail to bully people into using gender inclusive language which favors women. If you then go and use those terms in a non sarcastic way in an infographic, makes this a bad infographic.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 04:15 PM
23

Headline is still technically true though. This is a brilliant example of how the media operates to generate the most revenue and publicity by twisting the truth.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 02:15 PM
17

This is exactly what happened to my post and why I don't bother with this one: https://www.reddit.com/r/nottheonion/comments/6keohw/blind_recruitment_trial_to_boost_gender_equality/ It wasn't against their rules in any way, they just ruled it not oniony, even though it objectively was and many others already thought so too and pushed it on the front page. Yes, I had an agenda posting this, but this wasn't against their rules, I checked it exactly because of that. I can understand if a sub doesn'…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 02:06 PM
3

If you find any new studies about men's (trans men included) consider posting them to /r/mensrightslinks afterwards. There is also r/mrref for other articles you can search
/r/MensRights01/03/18 09:22 AM
2

Humor?
/r/MensRights01/03/18 09:16 AM
76

r/nottheonion
/r/MensRights01/03/18 08:56 AM
8

Do you think Paul Elams approach of provocation is a good way to get people to start listening to mens rights issues? And if not, why has every other way failed over the decades?
/r/MensRights01/03/18 08:49 AM
1

I enjoy my life and i dont suffer from those Happy to hear that it was just a joke :)
/r/MensRights28/02/18 07:10 PM
1

Thank you! Do you personally think it's a problem that there is a etiquette in a professional setting? We have an etiquette in the west too. And it's gendered to some extend. For example in the way we dress. Is this really bad? What are the repercussions if you fall out of line? Of course not being able to get every job if you're good enough, just because of your gender, is a valid reason to protest.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 05:43 PM
38

People not talking about the empathy gap is part of the empathy gap.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 05:32 PM
2

Its parts of masculinity which can contribute to problems. It's part of human behavior, not only masculinity, because there are women who behave in the same shitty way you would describe as toxic masculinity. So the only thing that this term does is unnecessarily frame the discussion in a toxic way. It is also part of masculinity, not only. The same goes for "toxic femininity". It's feminist language The phrase "toxic masculinity" was invented by the mythopoetic men's movement, not feminists. Th…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 01:32 PM
5

Women are some of the biggest consumers of rap - rapping about fucking and slapping hoes around. Women in the west eat this shit up. Do you have a source on that? I would think men are the majority of people listening to rap music. A BIG QUESTION is this: why don't feminists attack rap to be banned on the scale that other things get attacked, like Trump or a science dude wearing a naked woman sketched shirt? They tried. But rap didn't gave a shit. It's when you fail the feminist shit test is whe…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 01:06 PM
4

I don't like the use of terms like toxic masculinity. It's not masculinity that is the problem. It's individual people that are the problem. It's feminist language, which is there to shape the narrative that only men are the problem and that there is something inherently wrong with them. Which not paints the whole picture. Have a look at how feminists try to establish words like mansplaining, manspreading, toxic masculinity, patriarchy, feminism, the list goes on. In germany they bully instituti…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 12:22 PM
6

the funny thing is, mgtow, incel, mra, all say "we don't want to play the game". Its not about forcing women. Its about withholding from women because the game isn't 'fair'. It's more like... Incels: Fuck/destroy the game MGTOW: Don't play the game MRAs: Change the game TheRedPill: Exploit the game All are hated for what they do by society.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 11:26 AM
2

I agree masculinity needs to change. Why and how? What is wrong with masculinity in your opinion?
/r/MensRights28/02/18 11:04 AM
1

I would be interested in knowing what is different for japanese women to western women. Do you have any reading material or videos on that? How is this different from the womens march in the us? I only know the male perspective on this.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 10:58 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MRRef/comments/4kq9rx/the_truth_about_suicide_do_women_actually_attempt/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2q2a9p/do_women_really_attempt_suicide_more_often/ If you have other evidence on that topic, other than the researched ones in these threads, I'm willing to change my mind
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:26 PM
7

quintopple that!
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:22 PM
2

Women don't attempt suicide more often! This is a myth, based on a statistic about people hospitalized for suicide attempts. Of course this only counts people taking pills instead of holding a gun to your head but not pulling the trigger.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:14 PM
1

That sounds sad. See the bright side of being a man. You have the right to show your nipple, women don't.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 04:35 PM
8

Source: Abstract: This paper assesses gender disparities in federal criminal cases. It finds large gender gaps favoring women throughout the sentence length distribution (averaging over 60%), conditional on arrest offense, criminal history, and other pre-charge observables. Female arrestees are also significantly likelier to avoid charges and convictions entirely, and twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted. Prior studies have reported much smaller sentence gaps because they have ign…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 04:29 PM
1

Providing context is always better, agree.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 01:37 PM
3

I don't get your point. Don't you think that talking about an issue is the first step to solve it?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 01:25 PM
3

You forgot the /s
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:39 PM
7

Paternity fraud is a mens rights issue. This article is about paternity fraud. There are people who don't believe paternity fraud exists or at least that it isn't as big of a problem. By reiterating in /r/MensRights that this exists we are addressing that this is a problem that affects men. Paternity fraud is a serious crime in my opinion, which should be punishable in some form or at least be compensated for. She hid it from both
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:38 PM
8

Paternity fraud?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:25 PM
84

I would have the same perspective on this as him. He doesn't want to take anything away from women, he just wants things to be fair.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:23 PM
9

The statistic that is touted by feminists over and over again is based on the number of hospitalisation after suicide attempts. But you can't count the number of times someone drunkenly holds a gun to his head but doesn't pull the trigger. You can only count the number of people who have to go to the hospital after taking a few sleeping pills to many and calling someone else as a cry for help: No complete count is kept of suicide attempts in the U.S.; however, the CDC gathers data each year from…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 11:34 AM
2

Thanks, fixed it
/r/MensRights26/02/18 07:01 PM
12

Displayed on the x-axis are the women among STEM graduates in %, on the y-axis the so called "Global Gender Gap Index" Countries with greater gender equality see a smaller proportion of women taking degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), a new study by Leeds Beckett has found. Using data on 475,000 adolescents across 67 countries or regions, the researchers found that while boys’ and girls’ achievement in STEM subjects was broadly similar, science was more likely to …
/r/MensRights26/02/18 03:34 PM
3

Because feminists are (in general) more masculine than "normal" women: Abstract: The feminist movement purports to improve conditions for women, and yet only a minority of women in modern societies self-identify as feminists. This is known as the feminist paradox. It has been suggested that feminists exhibit both physiological and psychological characteristics associated with heightened masculinization, which may predispose women for heightened competitiveness, sex-atypical behaviors, and belief…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 10:34 PM
2

The headline of this article is very disingenuous and divisive, but the insult "lunatic leftists" fits. The regressive left, cultural marxist are delusional people who don't accept any truth and reject science. They are lunatic
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:25 PM
2

Wow, she even takes the right stance on the comparison to FGM. I applaud this woman
/r/MensRights20/02/18 08:22 PM
7

I agree only to some extend. Women are loved for their youth and beauty or summarized, for the ability to provide healthy offspring. Men are loved for their ability to provide for that offspring (and the woman). Nobody cares about ugly women in the same way nobody cares about men who cannot provide. Ugly women are treated like men, on merit. Though, most women are seen as beautiful enough by men to be provided for. Only a small minority of women is seen as ugly. When ugly women are treated as me…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:12 AM
2

Link to the study itself: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08974454.2017.1314845
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:20 PM
9

There was a good documentary about this topic in Norway some time ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5LRdW8xw70
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:07 PM
1

I think single motherhood has exaggerated that to some extend. A father who is able to say no and set boundaries is often missing. There are more single mothers in the US and more intact families in europe.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:52 PM
1

It's all projection.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:50 PM
4

Homeless people with dogs sometimes get more sympathy because of the dog. Heard a lot of people talking about always giving homeless people with dogs money to get the dog some food. So yes, this would be an indication for that.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:46 PM
1

There was also https://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightslinks/comments/6iulrc/socialstudy_sex_differences_in_human_neonatal/
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:42 PM
13

Didn't know truth was a gender. Guess today you never know
/r/MensRights15/02/18 01:19 PM
17

Obligatory segment from The Red Pill Movie
/r/MensRights15/02/18 10:27 AM
8

if some bright spark starts taunting feminists or pulling down posters, it could undo all your hard work. This is exactly what I stressed in the starting thread. Don't give them a reason to disband you. Establish good contacts with the teachers in charge first. And talk to your attendees about that
/r/MensRights15/02/18 09:23 AM
12

Good job! The first meeting will be about how to be a good listener Cassie Jaye had talk on that topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBSbsJ4zdsI&t=5m2s Maybe you can use things from that for later meetings as an exercise. I don't know if it's the right content for the first meeting, as you want to motivate and bond people in the first one and find a common goal to fight for. Men bond through action, and men need a higher goal to aim for. If you want young men to follow you, maybe find a way t…
/r/MensRights15/02/18 09:14 AM
3

Don't forget about this great debate about rape culture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pcp3NXSR60s&t=1m55s where this woman got crushed
/r/MensRights15/02/18 08:36 AM
26

Step 1: Go see a lawyer Step 2: Record and document their actions. Ask for a raise. Step 3: Sue them for discrimination Step 4: Win
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:35 AM
6

There is no reason to make this optional feature gender specific. None
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:30 AM
2

That may be possible. Thanks for correcting me. I need to be more precise in the future
/r/MensRights14/02/18 09:23 PM
2

Have a look at /r/mensrightslinks It's full of good stuff like that. My favorite study is this one: Sex differences in human neonatal perception 102 human neonates, who by definition have not yet been influenced by social and cultural factors, were tested to see if there was a difference in looking time at a face (social object) and a mobile (physical-mechanical object). Results showed that the male infants showed a stronger interest in the physical-mechanical mobile while the female infants sho…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:37 PM
1

Reddit is social media. It seems like most people are just circling like vultures, looking for anything they can cry "I'm so offended" about, and demand people console then. Aren't we kind of doing the same here?
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:36 PM
3

Canada is the most toxic country for men by far. They actually got rid of cross examination of women in rape cases because it hurts their feelings, and banned a specific type of digital evidence in these cases too(edit: not sure if this propositions got through or not). All with the goal in mind to get more rape convictions. This is why there is such a high number of really good MRA's or anti feminists coming from that country. Out of poor necessity.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:35 PM
1

Because reasons
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:31 PM
2

Two things: Alpha and beta are real concepts: In the study, researchers had 508 heterosexual adults rate the attractiveness of male and female facial photographs as either long-term or short-term partners. The study found that the masculinity or femininity of a face appeared to be more important than the symmetry of facial features or healthy/unhealthy skin coloration, particularly for male faces. The study also found that more masculine faces were preferred more for a short-term relationship th…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:21 PM
1

Found the study I was talking about: Abstract: We study the effect of likability on female and male team behavior in a lab experiment. Extending a two-player public goods game and a minimum effort game by an additional pre-play stage that informs team members about their mutual likability we find that female teams lower their contribution to the public good in case of low likability, while male teams achieve high levels of cooperation irrespective of the level of mutual likability. In mixed sex …
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:05 PM
5

He does this for his own protection. If he would name and shame her this could be seen as revenge and harassment by the court. When this is over he could name her, but I guess he just wants closure and doesn't want anything to do with her ever again after that.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:57 PM
1

The girl I was writing about was borderline.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:22 PM
2

Though he made many mistakes. He shouldn't have talked to this detective to begin with and his first action should have been to immediately contact a lawyer.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:20 PM
2

Christians gave us bad reasons for some good ideas and when more progressive and libertarian minded people began to reject conservatism, traditionalism and religion I think they correctly identified that much of the reason behind the traditional status quo is faulty. But then they took it a step to far. We assumed that because the reasons given were bad, that the conclusions must also be false. And it wasn't until Jordan Peterson showed up that hardly anyone offered secular justification for oth…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 10:33 AM
7

Woman only (or mother and child) parking spaces are a thing in germany too in almost every parking space or multi-storey car park. They're normally in a well lit area and near the entrance and exist.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 10:10 AM
1

I hope it didn't hit you unprepared and you noticed the NSFL tag beforehand. Do you think it's warranted to keep those gifs and videos in this copy pasta?
/r/MensRights14/02/18 10:04 AM
2

They even qualified for the world cup in the summer.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 09:25 AM
2

Not rape, but something similar http://wtvr.com/2017/05/27/corey-walgren-parents-suing-his-school-and-police-after-suicide-naperville-illinois/
/r/MensRights14/02/18 09:02 AM
2

The solution is simple. Document EVERYTHING you encounter in case of discrimination against you. Safe every email and message you get. Transcribe every incident in meetings or with co workers with timestamp and place. If it is legal in your country, buy a small voice recorder or even camera and carry it with you the whole day and record every interactions in the workplace. If you encounter anything note it down in a document. Safe every voice recording or video and archive it, and think about a …
/r/MensRights14/02/18 08:33 AM
2

As if women were not competitive. Put a feminist against a MRA and see what happens. I didn't say they were not. Funnily enough, feminists are more masculine than other women, look at this study for the feminist paradox: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158978/ We measured the 2D:4D digit ratios (collected from both hands) and a personality trait known as dominance (measured with the Directiveness scale) in a sample of women attending a feminist conference. The sample exhibited sign…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:24 AM
2

Watch www.theredpillmovie.com if you haven't seen it. There are some heartbreaking stories about divorce cases which you could use and I think she highlights some well researched statistics too. You can also have a look at this website and filter for divorce: www.mrarchivist.com and have a look at these subreddits for further studies: /r/mensrightslinks /r/MRRef Good luck
/r/MensRights13/02/18 10:16 PM
4

Look at this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7JzdcZPvzg Here's a list about some more facts, which I posted further down in this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7x9tir/iceland_to_ban_boys_circumcision_introduces_6year/du79aqo/
/r/MensRights13/02/18 09:37 PM
20

AWESOME! Go Iceland! This is a copypasta I try to maintain on circumcision and how it can be harmful. I don't dislike circumcision in general, I just despise infant circumcision. There is Female Genital Mutilation Type I a, classified by the WHO, which is the removal of the clitoral hood. The clitoral hood develops into the foreskin in male fetus. So FGM Type I a for a girl is what circumcision is for a boy. It is the same bodypart on different genders. The medical term for female mutilation typ…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 09:31 PM
2

You're right, but only visible when I'm logged out. Will write the mods, thank you
/r/MensRights13/02/18 08:28 PM
5

Thank you, very interesting. Posted the corresponding study in /r/mensrightslinks https://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightslinks/comments/7xc0ju/socialstudy_crosscultural_sex_differences_in/
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:53 PM
10

Yes, I read about a study in which it was outlined that male group can overcome personal differences to achieve a common goal better than female or mixed groups, will try to find it. "I don't like him but he has a good work ethic" is a sentence you hear more often from men.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:22 PM
26

Borderline women people are one of the most toxic people there are. I've had a close friend who suffered first hand from such a woman. She was abusive and rude as fuck when I encountered her. He wanted me to meet her so we decided to take her to the stadium to see a football game. She drove us because so we could have our usual beer at the game. I immediately didn't like her and noticed she was a bad driver and told her numerous times to slow down and keep her eyes on the road. 500m infront of t…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 06:28 PM
10

Men in general are more competitive when it comes to athleticism: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9639863
/r/MensRights13/02/18 05:58 PM
6

As I did some hiking myself, different paces can be a point of conflict. Its totally possible that a "diverse" group of people decides to hike a trail together (which may be a sign of inexperience), but agree to split up later on their way because it's really annoying for both, the faster and the slower individuals. I too think it's highly likely that a 250lb person will not be able keep up and will hold back everybody else. I said to myself to not hike again with someone who is not prepared and…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 05:51 PM
13

I think MGTOW's have a point in not wanting to live or cohabit with women under the current system. Many MGTOW's have had horrible experiences with women and I understand if that was just too much for them to experience ever again. But even all of that considered, it is wrong to hate anybody because of something they had no control over in their life's. Hate the people who are responsible for those laws, hate the women that were just pos to you and chose to not live with them but the moment you …
/r/MensRights13/02/18 05:03 PM
25

I am hoping this is some kind of satire. No one should be so blind to their own bias and to other peoples perspective and suffering when they're telling you about it right into your face. She completely ignores what this journey is about. To expand your view on life, your perspective, to find meaning and companionship, friendship. To lose/destroy your old materialistic and egoistic self and let suffering and hardship mold you a new. She failed to find all of those. She drove home more bitter tha…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 03:19 PM
10

The good thing with hiking is, there is no authority they can attack. It's an individual sport. There can be no code of conduct. The only attack vector I see possible are the places, restaurants bars etc, where the hikers meet to refill
/r/MensRights13/02/18 02:54 PM
73

This article is a gold mine for feminist entitlement and bitterness A sweet athletic blonde woman takes a liking to me and slows down her pace so we can hike together for a few hours. She admits she knows the trail is a boys club, but she’s used to it because she teaches snowboarding in the winter and that’s a boys club, too. She tells me she kinda likes being in the club, so she makes herself one of the boys. The sweet (probably attractive) athletic blond just adapts and enjoys the male culture…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 11:54 AM
27

Exactly. And hiking 450 miles is in itself a great success! She didn't quit because she was to fat, she probably quit because she was a bitter nag to to people, annoying them with her feminist bullshit and getting backlash for it. She got her trailname on her first day (scissors, because she is gay) which probably means she annoyed her whole group with her agenda from minute 1. If it stinks like shit everywhere you go, you should probably look on your own hiking shoes. Though she describes herse…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 11:39 AM
2

Got banned for posting just this: Study proves: "[..]sex differences are in part biological in origin" A study from Cambridge University. You can't make that up. They're literally against science and don't accept biology
/r/MensRights13/02/18 09:44 AM
1

Ok, but you get the point
/r/MensRights13/02/18 09:00 AM
2

What does this question mean? English is not my first language. You probably don't know this person and haven't read anything from him, yet you felt the need to insult him immediately. This is a pretty hostile way to communicate. I wanted to know why you thought this was necessary, just interested. Maybe you think op is a troll or something? I have upvoted 5 others of your posts, so you're probably not always this way. Is everything alright?
/r/MensRights12/02/18 09:18 PM
7

So all things equal, 1/3 of the founds should go to fighting womens heard disease if they have a gender specific problem and 2/3 to mens gender specific heart diseases. If there is no gender specific heart disease it doesn't matter if they use women as a special token? Or not? So we should have a look how much funding goes to women and men to say if this justified. But in general this poster is okay. Would you say there is a problem with a mans organization advocating for funds for male breast c…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 06:28 PM
10

Awesome. Cassie Jaye is a hero. She had an awesome TedX talk about her journey making the film and the message she wants to send: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WMuzhQXJoY
/r/MensRights12/02/18 06:07 PM
13

Watch, or get people to watch, this movie with them!
/r/MensRights12/02/18 05:04 PM
1

Yes, it's really awesome. So awesome, that I see it getting bought up by Apple, Microsoft or Google in the near future unfortunately
/r/MensRights12/02/18 04:12 PM
1

Sometimes an discussion ends when people just agree to disagree. I think we both have the same goal, to create the most just world just world for everyone possible. We should leave it as that
/r/MensRights12/02/18 04:11 PM
1

One of these statements is a lie. Which one is it? No. Both can be true. "I have a problem with being objectified because of the double standard" is a completely justified and valid statement.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:45 PM
8

Uh, thank god. Could you imagine having a prostate cancer screening in public? /s To be fair, its in public discussion to get rid of excessive breast cancer screenings too, because it can result in to many cases in which the cancer would have never broken out or something like that. At least I heared something along these lines. There is a reason for this.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:11 PM
1

I understood your argument in the first place and get your point. I just disagree with it. Because the reasons for why I object to this objectification doesn't matter. I object it, and thats what counts. If there would only exist the objectification of men, there would be no problem. As you say yourself, you only object because of the double standard. The act of objectifying men is fine with you We don't exist in a vacuum. It's a hypothetical argument in which you completely negate the context i…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 12:58 PM
1

I raise a concern. I have a problem with the act of male objectification. The reasons for that are completely unimportant. Would you go around and ask women for the reasons? And even if, being against hypocrisy and for equality is a total valid reason! You started of with it's only a problem when people object to it. I said I object to it and suddenly it's the reasons that are most important and suddenly my reasons are not worthy. That's ridiculous. Edit: Who says what a valid and invalid reason…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 11:46 AM
2

Why are you so hostile?
/r/MensRights12/02/18 11:31 AM
1

I object to male objectification. So what now? (I only object to it, because of the double standard though, but that shouldn't make a difference)
/r/MensRights12/02/18 11:01 AM
2

Yes it does. Do your research.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 10:45 AM
3

What makes you think that I am not already doing that? You know, feminism fights tooth and nail that we change the laws in favor of men, pool money, donate, open shelters... You have NO IDEA what you're talking about! You're just a concern troll. You don't get to decide what I say or not
/r/MensRights12/02/18 10:43 AM
8

If feminism is responsible for 95% of the cases in which mens rights are attacked I think that it's justified. It's the mechanism of reddit that makes it so that low effort rage posts are always reaching the front page. You find that in EVERY subreddit. Think about lgbt communities rallying againt oppressive conservatives or religious maniacs. It's absolutely valid to critisize feminism or even hate it. The feminism which we encounter today is a vile totalitarian ideology which is not on it's wa…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 10:36 AM
9

You're just wrong. And you can hate feminism and help men and women at the same time.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 09:22 AM
12

Immediately stop talking to that person and stop interacting with her. Never be alone with her Talk to a lawyer Safe every email or message you have exchanged. There is a chance you get fired and lose access to your office pc, so safe as many information as possible. Record all future interactions If you're in a country where its legal to record audio, buy a voice recorder or a spy cam and have it on you the whole time you are in that environment, maybe get her to confess to the lie or try to re…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:58 AM
2

Not all women will abort though. Not all men will surrender their parental rights. I think it will be a minority, because the blame society would put on this men would be much more harsher than the blame they put on women who abort. Actually it became politically incorrect to shame women for abortion.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:15 PM
2

it only leaves the absolute choice of birth to the mother which is the best outcome You can't just say "the mother has to foot the bill if she chooses to birth the child" because that's not how the world works. Yes it is, the world now works with the mother being able to unilateraly abort and avoid all consequences. You can't just leave a child with no support because of the irresponsibility of the parents. The mother can chose not to give birth or give it away for adoption if she is not able to…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:26 PM
3

why not both?
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:13 PM
3

I know what you mean, but in my opinion "best interest of the child" is to have a father that is 100% to father a child. We need more fathers in the life of children instead of just paying fathers. The number of single mothers in the us is creating a catastrophe. Paternal surrender will create less unwanted kids.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:21 PM
4

what about when the dad don't want to be wit mom but wants to be a father to his child still? Thats a classical custody dispute. Of course mra's are fighting against unfair and biased custody laws against fathers. Its one of the most important topics. The way society treats fathers in general is just cruel and tortures sometimes. I wish you and your kids the best. Don't forget, if your kids grow up one time, they WILL remember all your efforts to fight for them.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:12 PM
3

I am actually surprised about how civil it is. I've heard more women agree with this idea than not. The only people having a problem with it are tradcons and pro-lifers. But they have a problem with abortion in general, so of course they are against paternal surrender too.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:09 PM
1

What a great right, to have responsibilities. lol You remind me of this woman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uyxANb6Ne0&t=21s This woman is Katherine Spillar, the Executive Editor of Ms. Magazine and Co-Founder and Executive Director of the Feminist Majority Foundation. This is what a feminist sounds like, men have the right to take responsibility.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:02 PM
1

Yes, The Orville has progressive elements in it for sure. But so did Star Trek always too. And for me, in The Orville, they don't feel forced. And that is the problem I have it in this climate, if I get the feeling they want to educate people and force an agenda upon them instead of just entertain them. I think Seth Mcfarlene is somewhere in the middle of this debate. It could even be that he is actually mocking this debate for example by putting the smallest woman possible as chief of security …
/r/MensRights11/02/18 02:50 PM
1

Yes, The Orville has progressive elements in it for sure. But so did Star Trek always too. And for me, in The Orville, they don't feel forced. And that is the problem I have it in this climate, if I get the feeling they want to educate people and force an agenda upon them instead of just entertain them. I think Seth Mcfarlene is somewhere in the middle of this debate. It could even be that he is actually mocking this debate for example by putting the smallest woman possible as chief of security …
/r/MensRights11/02/18 02:49 PM
9

I see. And OPs concern is totally valid in itself. It was just important for me to clarify that this is not an actual argument mra's stand for.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:08 PM
1

Isn't that a different argument? I want to ask you a question. What about cases where the man is stating before the sex to the woman, without a misunderstanding, that he does not want to have a child and only agrees to sex if the woman is taking a contraception. But the woman is willfully lying to him about taking the pill and she is getting pregnant. Should the man pay child support for this child?
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:06 PM
10

Yes I know, your argument is good and I agree with it. I just wanted to point out that this part of your argument is a straw man argument which is used against our position.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:02 PM
1

I actually liked your way of discussion because it was constructive. But we're running in circles now and the discussion is not on point anymore but about how we discuss, this is partly my fault. We both made our point clear I guess. Have a nice day
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:00 PM
6

But that fetus will with the mothers choice of not aborting become a human. So women should not be able to abort then, because the fetus will become a human? So where do you propose the now single woman gets money to raise her human properly. If she is not able to raise the kid alone, she can chose to abort or give the kid up for adoption. she will be forced to abort. No, bullshit. She can just give it away
/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:58 PM
56

Yes, but these are pro-lifers. The mens rights argument is not a pro-life argument. Its even the case that men have pressured women into having abortions under the current system, this proposition would prevent most of these cases. I am pro choice for both men and women but the pro-life argument is at least logically consistent in its argument.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:34 PM
2

The point is that a baby exists in this situation. No, the argument is to surrender parental rights when that baby DOESN'T exist. There is no child, its a fetus. Men pulling their responsibilities would force the woman to SERIOUSLY reconsider having the baby. And if she knows she cant care for it alone. She is essentially forced to abort. This is pure assumption. I am ok with you making a stance for the pro life argument for both men and women. What I am not okay with is supporting this logical …
/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:30 PM
4

A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man". (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man) It IS absolutely a strawman argument because this is not an actual mens rights proposition. The opponents of that idea have created that for the argument and put these words i…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:25 PM
6

Women get pregnant and men don't. It's just a different set of circumstances. Sorry, that's just the way things are. This argument only ever gets touted when it suits women. If it's in favor of women, biology will even be declared a social construct. Equality isn't a one way street. It wouldn't be right for a man to force an abortion. And this is a strawman argument, nobody is advocating for forced abortion. Your argument is disingenuous.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:45 AM
127

But in no way should you be able to force me to carry a pregnancy to term if you want the baby and I don't. Nobody is asking for this. It's a strawman argument created by opponents of that proposition.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:31 AM
8

You're making a pro life argument though, but only if it applies to the man.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:38 AM
7

If women had to pay solely for unwanted children, do you think there would be more or less unwanted pregnancies? Would there be more or less children suffering? Would there be more or less fathers which stand 100% behind their kids?
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:37 AM
6

The real equivalent right would be for a man to have the right to force a woman he got pregnant to abort, and that’s gonna be a tough sell. Nobody wants that to happen. That is not a mens rights argument. The argument is purely about legal paternal surrender by giving up all rights and responsibilities to a child
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:34 AM
5

As long as you hold women to that same standard there is no problem in your logic.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:32 AM
4

I am starting to think there won't be a push back necessary, because we are creating a society that is going to collapse one day, resulting in a world with a turned back clock. I hope we're coming to sense before then.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:28 AM
9

It leaves the absolute choice with the mother. She has to be able to still abort after the father gave away his parental rights and responsibilities. She has the choice to bear her child as a burden to society. There is a chance that this will actually result in less taxpayer money spend on childcare when women have to pay the majority of the price for their life choices again. Hold women accountable again with child birth and you will see more happy families. Give fathers a choice and you will …
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:18 AM
12

By rights, this withdrawal would have to be available to both father and mother, for the sake of equal opportunity. Currently it is the mother that can abort, give the child up to adoption or use baby hatch. Again, we would need to rethink the entire framework around child services[..] Good! At this point in time, we all have different answers to these questions. The existing system is flawed, yes, but so is conception. Conception, by nature, is not equal between man and woman. This argument is …
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:08 AM
15

*only in a world where abortion is legal It totally makes sense to hold people accountable for their life choices. But if one is not, the other should follow.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:50 AM
17

He's critizing islam in a constructive way
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:48 AM
7

Jordan Peterson disagrees
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:23 AM
1

It seems like the recent banning of deepfakes gave them hope to be able to steer up things in here and get this sub banned or something? But I would guess there are much better ways to do that if you have this as your ultimate goal.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:53 PM
1

No hard feelings at all. Can take a mean joke if its with good intentions. I don't know what the guy who was spilling insults left and right had to drink yesterday though, I had the impression he was a drunk tradcon
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:46 PM
3

Yes, therefore insurers took the loophole to charge based on what car you drive and make the costs to drive typical male cars higher. I think it's a fair solution and compromise.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 08:12 PM
1

I think everybody made their point, even though it was brigaded.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 08:07 PM
1

I completely disagree with you on this issue too, but I like how you form your argument. Even though some may see it as concern trolling. We need different perspectives here if it is conducted in a constructive way like you did. We need to help holding the mrm in check, I hope you don't let taking flak for it discourage you and have understanding for the conspiracy theories which are yielded against you. Mens rights movement is constantly under attack.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 08:03 PM
1

We do this sometimes here to though. All that is needed for that is a link to another sub in here and everybody is running over there. But in this case something felt wrong
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:38 PM
4

I noticed the exact same thing. The comments which were critical were there already highly upvoted when I saw the post. I instantly knew there is something wrong. I want to say, I don't have anything against someone stating a critical opinion, even though in this case I didn't agree with them. And I tried to argue on point.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:36 PM
1

This is an awesome idea. You should write the mods to make a sticky about this protest. And you should start a project on https://www.mhraconnect.com/ There needs to be an organized reddit thread which needs to reach the front page. For that to happen it has to be a precise text with a clear call to action, maybe in a form of a infographic. This has to be formulated in a way that every political direction can get behind the cause and paints the insurers as being against true equality. There can'…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:25 PM
1

You probably don't see calling someone privileged as blaming them, which is fine I guess. Intention matters. But I've had it seen to often in this context. For me this language is part of an ideology that i think is harmful. Don't take it as offense, I know your intentions are probably good
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:03 PM
1

You're right, I haven't thought about that. It's highly likely that this skewed the statistic too. The question is, to what extend when we know the sentencing gap between men and women is 60%
/r/MensRights10/02/18 05:26 PM
1

I know, I understand the concept of privilege in the context of how postmodernists are using it. I just think it's wrong to blame a person for having privilege for something they had no control over.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 02:45 PM
1

To insinuate someone is privileged is a form of collective punishment and guilt and not right. It's a different thing to say a demographic is discriminated against. To assume someone is guilty of having privilege because of their gender, skin color or sexual orientation and using that as an accusation is simply evil. I hope you'll change your mind about that one day. Thank you for staying open minded and have a nice weekend!
/r/MensRights10/02/18 02:37 PM
1

But there are some black homeless men who are better off than most white homeless men which renders this line of thinking useless. When there is specific discrimination against black people, like the sentencing gap for example, I'm there to fight that with you though.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 01:20 PM
20

"There's a reason why people are freaking out at the idea of men being liberated, and part of it is, that once you've liberated everybody, who's gonna actually contribute to society? If EVERYBODY in society is a free agent -- and they don't owe anything to society but themselves -- you're not left with a society, you're left with a bunch of free agents, and everything will just fall apart." Karen is arguing that this is what people think about men, it's not necessarily what she might think. But …
/r/MensRights10/02/18 12:47 PM
1

You should listen to Jordan Peterson speaking about privilege theory https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbDggKqt3KA "The individual is the ultimate minority", we already figured out to judge people individually and not about being part of a group. Privilege theory is judging people because of their skin color and sex, which makes it simply racist and sexist and therefor this will lead to evil.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 12:35 PM
1

For some people one big part of their meaning of live is creating existence in the form of biological offspring. Lying about fulfilling that part of life in that way to man and making him pay for this is pure evil. I don't ever want to be in a situation where I am in the late years of my life and the mother of my children tells me my children are not mine. I would be devastated and don't know how I would cope with this. It's one way a mother can destroy the lives of not only the man, but the chi…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 12:28 PM
4

I hate what they made with Star Trek. Dave Cullens analysis of this is pretty spot on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBb0hyuIfYQ
/r/MensRights10/02/18 12:08 PM
4

Very good subjective analysis. I have the same impression. Feminism took the innocent viewpoint away from me. It literally made the political private. And I hate it. There still are people who never gave a shit and have always portrait men and women alike. Tarantino for example brutalizes the death of vile women in the same way as men if I remember it correctly but has also many female hero's which are likable and who suffer the same as men would This all reminds me of the feminist analysis abou…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 12:03 PM
2

It's not a hyperbole. There are just about 2% women in construction, enough to say they are statistically insignificant. Men built everything, there is nothing offensive about saying this. It's just factually correct. I disagree with you. It takes nothing away from women to acknowledge that men are the ones building human infrastructure, in the same way it takes nothing away to say every human you see was birthed by a woman. This quote from a feminist actually made me think and respect women's c…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:23 AM
2

You're forgetting an important part about our human evolution. Artificial intelligence and robotic will be used to help humanity too. In regards to mens rights, think about an AI that will help judges find the most fair verdict, if the AI is bound by the law, that women and men should be treated equally, we will see the prison and sentencing gap between men and women gone! A fair AI which was developed to find ways to end the most human suffering possible, will help men first and find solutions …
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:00 AM
2

I agree that there is much more discrimination in the law against men than there is against women. But that doesn't mean that women rule over us. I know what you mean though, and I feel your frustration about the current situation too.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 08:45 AM
11

You're not contributing anything worthwhile to this discussion yourself.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:24 PM
7

It seems they still got your attention though
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:15 PM
5

What nature? Allergies are a social construct like everything else /s
/r/MensRights09/02/18 09:58 PM
10

There is no matriarchy. A matriarchy is even more ridiculous than that we're living in a patriarchy. You could argue for gynocentrism though and take /u/Taxus_Calyx point as evidence for that. Your points are absolutely valid and describe ways in which men are discriminated against today, but the # is not good.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 09:23 PM
8

That was brutal. I hope it reached the correct person. Thank you! You said ranted it better than me.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 09:13 PM
2

Obviously there are a lot of things women have built and contributed too. Of course! Women are awesome, I love them! We would just happily live together quietly appreciating the combined efforts that make us better as a whole. So how do we counter feminist hate? And more importantly how do we reach those who don't want to be hateful but are just ill educated and are told men are the root of all evil? And how do we tell young men that being a man is not a crime and that masculinity is good? Becau…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:56 PM
3

The point is that often such celebrations for women are bashed for ignoring the contributions of men I guess we are living in different realities and I don't mean that in a condescending way. In my reality everything feminine is celebrated and every contribution of men to society is shunned in the public discussion. Perhaps we just live in different bubbles? Makes me think. This subreddit is terribly hypocritical sometimes. I have to agree. And normally I like to point that out myself and get fl…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:39 PM
3

Lol no I'll still support men's rights That's the most important thing. Good that we're on the same page. Perhaps one day you and others won't feel the need to feel superior over the other gender; we are all humans after all. If you would know anything about me, you would laugh about this sentence. I don't think I am superior than women. I am stronger than most women because I am a man, but still there are women that are much stronger than me. Men and women have different strengths and weaknesse…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:20 PM
1

You truly think that all of the world's infrastructure (everything you see) was built solely by men? Yes, the world's infrastructure was built by men. Of course there are exceptions. I support men's rights but this is just chauvinism. It's chauvinism in the same way as saying men have a penis and women a vagina is chauvinism. Thank you for supporting the rights of men and I hope you continue to support our rights even if you dislike some posters in the future.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 07:51 PM
6

You're implying that this poster is hate, which is absolutely ridiculous. I agree with you, us vs. them mentality is immature. And I don't see that in this picture. We want equality, not superiority like feminists. I agree. But saying men are awesome is not saying men are superior to women in any way, nor is it against equality. Edit: Btw, I think this post has been deleted
/r/MensRights09/02/18 07:48 PM
5

lol, get sober
/r/MensRights09/02/18 07:25 PM
5

How is this wrong in any way? Where is the hate? WTF Edit: You're the equivalent of the person getting angry about the sentence "It's okay to be white"
/r/MensRights09/02/18 07:21 PM
9

You're absolutely correct, it's pretty telling how people project ill intend behind such an innocent message. Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 07:19 PM
12

Good for you, but you know there are currently young women (and men) educated by radical feminists in gender study which need to see these messages, because nobody else is telling them. It's people like these: https://i.imgur.com/0B7NhAF.jpg And you know, you could make your argument without insulting me in such an passive aggressive way and talk like an adult.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 07:15 PM
13

Men aren't awesome. Men simply are. Just as women simply are. So nobody is awesome. Awesome.. As for the men that built what you see there...some of those men were/are awesome...others not so much. I agree. I have a dick, I use it. I have contributed to making both males and females with this dick...I treat both the same. You might get somewhere if you start approaching things this way. What makes you think that I don't treat every person I encounter with the same dignity I demand from them? You…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 07:03 PM
5

I understood your argument and I wanted to say in this case its a bad analogy because the difference in gender between murder and working in construction is much more significant in murder and statistically insignificant in construction. What u/feraxil probably wanted to express is, there is no need for people to always say that there are exceptions to a rule or generalizations, because its implied that there always is an exception in nature.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 06:53 PM
3

And not every child was born by a woman: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/transgender-man-gives-birth-baby-first-child-woman-kaci-sullivan-wisconsin-a8107481.html
/r/MensRights09/02/18 06:43 PM
8

So shouldn't women be allowed to celebrate femininity? Who is saying that in the mens rights movement? I don't have a problem with encouraging women to do anything they want. Thats not the point at all. We should be able to celebrate the accomplishments of men and women. We currently have a lack of recognition of the positive sides of masculinity. Men get attacked form all places. Its much needed to point out the sacrifices that men make to society. This poster does this.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 06:42 PM
5

How does this picture denigrate the accomplishments of women in any way? It doesn't at all! You're projecting! Its a much needed celebration of masculinity in times where its shunned and described as toxic from vile feminists.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 06:38 PM
18

You're right http://izquotes.com/quotes-pictures/quote-all-women-s-issues-are-to-some-degree-men-s-issues-and-all-men-s-issues-are-to-some-degree-women-s-warren-farrell-60385.jpg But that doesn't make it not okay to celebrate masculinity when it is constantly put down and shunned by feminists.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 06:33 PM
13

You're right, men are the majority of murderers. But did you know... While men kill much more often, with a percentage ranging from somewhere around 80% up to 90%, it seems noteworthy to me that both men and women kill men more often (study form Sweden) than women. Men account for around 60-90% of murder victims (depending on the country). Society only cares about the victims when they are women and only about the perpetrators when they're male. A murder with a female victim is even around 60% m…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 06:29 PM
34

I really like your attitude to not go eye for an eye and take the high ground. But this poster isn't even mentioning women. There is no harmful message for them in it. Its just stating a fact. Its taking nothing away from women and is only celebrating men for their sacrifice to society. Something which is eagerly missing in these times. The fact that you think saying that men are awesome is bad for women, is somehow worrying. You should ask yourself, why do you feel the need to defend women in t…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 06:20 PM
14

If you don't want to spend any money but want at least help a bit, use google alternatives like www.duckduckgo.com for search, the Brave browser as a chrome replacement and www.deepl.com as a translator which is much better than google translate anyway
/r/MensRights09/02/18 03:59 PM
1

It's the same people that are denying there are male issues to begin with and are fighting the patriarchy that are saying white people are destroying the planet. Its based in the same ideology.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 03:33 PM
1

They're totally logical. The regressive left is racist and sexist against white men. Racism and sexism go hand in hand with these people. If you would've read and seen have the things I've had, you wouldn't say this. They make judgements based on sex and skin color, we made the experience that doing that is a mistake and will lead to hell on earth, therefore we as a society agreed to judge people as individuals. But now the people that perceive themselves as oppressed think they're in the right …
/r/MensRights09/02/18 03:31 PM
2

I haven't made my mind up about if men are oppressed. It doesn't sound right to me, because we are not helpless. And I don't want to follow into the same trap as feminists. But its no question men are heavily discriminated against, and that more and more. And about the conspiracy theory in the media. I think there is no evil council (at least in general) somewhere deciding what and what cannot be send out to the people. I think its more that each individual journalist has a clear picture and age…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:45 AM
3

An even better and more accurate translator than google translate is deepl with www.deepl.com for everyone who wants to degooglify themselves. The text reads as follows: Equality between women and men is a question of justice. It is a prerequisite and engine for sustainable development and the future viability of our society, both nationally and internationally. For us, real equality between women and men, promotion of family friendliness, the values of the Basic Law and the international agreem…
/r/MensRights08/02/18 12:54 PM
4

Shoutout to http://genderama.blogspot.de, a good source to stay informed for everyone speaking german and interested in mens rights.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:26 AM
8

Patriarchy in itself is a first class conspiracy theory
/r/MensRights08/02/18 10:58 AM
2

The justice system in the US is just fucked. And for men even more. How many innocent men are sitting in jail because of this stupid plea deal system? If you ever need a mission in life, there it is, this needs a change.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 10:32 AM
1

I know what you were trying to say and we are on the same page. I just think we need to stop repeating feminist mantra and talking points, because if you repeat a lie often enough, you yourself are going to internalize it one day.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 02:43 PM
3

Why are we bad for wanting to get laid? We're not, stop saying those things to yourself! I wonder why we are forced to feminize instead of women being forced to take on masculinizing rolls. We're not! Masculinity is good and healthy. Being competitive is good, being a leader is good. I get your point, but we need to stop using their talking points
/r/MensRights06/02/18 05:14 PM
7

Apply Get rejected because of your sex Sue Profit
/r/MensRights06/02/18 12:17 AM
16

File a title ix complaint after you talk to your teacher. Audio record your teacher if you live in a single party consent state for audio recordings, if not, transcribe it, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States) and use this in your complaint : https://nwlc.org/resources/how-to-file-a-title-ix-sexual-harassment-or-assault-complaint-with-the-u-s-department-of-education/
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:48 PM
3

I agree with you in general. It is just my opinion that it is not a healthy way growing up to see yourself as oppressed. We are not helpless. And the part about feminism is important for someone op's age too. It is not clever for op to get in a fight with a stupid feminist teachers who he is at mercy with because of grades. Bringing attention and awareness to mens issues is enough for a school club. Tackling feminism, even it is justified, can be dangerous. Talking about mens issues is enough a …
/r/MensRights05/02/18 04:02 PM
32

You're awesome for doing this! I have two advice for you. Maybe consider making it a group about male empowerment and not about male oppression, give it positive spin. Don't dwell on the negative, be the positive. Don't make this about feminism or women at all. Make it absolutely clear, that your club is not a place to bash feminism, but to speak about men's rights and empowerment. This way you don't make yourself a target There were many like you trying to do this. You're not alone. Maybe write…
/r/MensRights04/02/18 06:36 PM
3

I just want to clear things up in case you misunderstood me, this is not an actual quote from the conversation, it's just an hyperbole analogy displayed with this meme.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 10:37 PM
1

Got banned for posting this thread: Study proves: "[..]sex differences are in part biological in origin" It linked to a study from the Cambridge university ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights28/01/18 05:11 PM
1

I think you're wrong, not everyone is a feminist troll.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 06:40 AM
3

You're right, it's not that significant, but.. the issue is that a man seeking pleasure is often seen as something dirty or evil, and a woman seeking pleasure is seen as liberating and progressive. There is a stigma about men masturbating. It's the underlying implication that they can't get a woman and are losers. Go ask a random young woman what she thinks about a man using a artificial vagina and she probably says something in between "gross" or "what a loser", though if you ask them if they h…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 09:48 PM
0

Or listen to this legend talk about the reason: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7izJggqCoA
/r/MensRights26/01/18 04:54 PM
6

I made a post some time ago: https://tinyurl.com/yd55ppug BestOf mods deleted it, and later told me they don't allow ANY posts about political issues like that because of brigading. Change the address from reddit into ceddit and have a look into what they deleted: Am I the only odd one out here who supports both MRA and feminism? DELETED! "Redditor lies about being an actual part of the MLM and conflates the MLM with the redpill guys and white supremacists. Uncritical Redditors accept this and p…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 09:56 AM
1

Just have a look at what posts they've censored: https://tinyurl.com/yc8ylw49 (ceddit link to their sub) More Women Than Men Enrolled in U.S. Medical Schools in 2017 DELETED! It's a link to a study from the Association of American Medical Colleges well, this topic is not new, but well, no posts are open, what can we do about MGM? What are my thoughts DELETED! One of the most important MRA topics cannot be discussed there! Is anyone else frustrated by the gender dynamics we see in dating, and esp…
/r/MensRights25/01/18 02:11 PM
2

Just have a look at what posts they've censored: https://www.ceddit.com/r/MensLib/ More Women Than Men Enrolled in U.S. Medical Schools in 2017 DELETED! It's a link to a study from the Association of American Medical Colleges well, this topic is not new, but well, no posts are open, what can we do about MGM? What are my thoughts DELETED! One of the most important MRA topics cannot be discussed there! Is anyone else frustrated by the gender dynamics we see in dating, and especially online dating?…
/r/MensRights25/01/18 02:08 PM
4

Yes, society has crossed the fine line between freedom and security to much. And it's the fault of the forever offended.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 11:05 PM
26

The following is a very informed and highly reusable comment by Karen Straughan in response to a feminist who thinks the many blatant sexists among feminists aren't real feminists: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousand…
/r/MensRights20/01/18 10:55 PM
1

"Equality in the workplace is the result of equality in the family court" There is this famous quote from a feminist which goes something like: If you want women to succeed in the workplace, you need men to succeed at the home. I couldn't find it, does anybody remember who said this?) ^
/r/MensRights20/01/18 10:44 AM
2

"but those crimes are usually perpetrated by other men" Let me explain how this may be a faulty premise by citing this example: While men kill much more often, with a percentage ranging from somewhere around 80% up to 90%, it's seems noteworthy to me that both men and women kill men more often (study form Sweden) than women. Men account for around 60-90% of murder victims (depending on the country). Society only cares about the victims when they are women and only about the perpetrators when the…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 11:27 PM
1

German police saying the numbers of false allegations are ranging from 30%-50%, up to 80%: https://translate.google.de/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ostsee-zeitung.de%2FRegion-Rostock%2FRostock%2FAcht-von-zehn-Vergewaltigungen-sind-vorgetaeuscht https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stuttgarter-zeitung.de%2Finhalt.vergewaltigung-oder-nicht-unschuldig-auf-der-anklagebank.2493a3cf-12db-4b64-afb8-5d7c3992699d.html&edit-t…
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:47 PM
1

The gender pay gap is as legit as the workplace death gap. Its because of individual choice
/r/MensRights27/09/17 01:56 PM
24

The video is edited. While its funny to watch a feminist "getting pwned" in an edited cut I would prefer an unedited source.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 02:09 PM
2

The people over there are beyond any reason. It's an absolute waste of time to engage them. I had to make that experience myself: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6lef6w/on_why_women_not_choosing_stem_is_not_comparable/ Don't be as stupid as me, don't waste your time and go over there, it's pointless.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 08:46 AM
6

www.mrarchivist.com It's an excellent database of hundreds of mens rights studies and papers or government numbers.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 03:03 PM
3

No, not at all. Population growth will start to decline at around 2040. Fertility rates in developed countries are falling below sustainable population levels. If the third world catches up to some degree, we will see the same pattern there. Overpopulation is a myth.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 10:06 AM
5

Thats not the important part. Its that: The low BS male target (compared to high BS male target) was judged to be higher on HS, less supportive of female professionals, less good of father and husband, and more likely to perpetrate domestic violence. and In Study 2, low BS male targets were judged to be low in hostility towards women only if they explicitly stated that their low BS was motivated by egalitarian values, otherwise men’s low BS was assumed to indicate misogyny Men who treat women as…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:29 PM
3

You can find studies or gov papers like that on /r/mensrightslinks and interesting articles or surveys on r/mrref There is also this huge MRA archive with many studies on www.mrarchivist.com
/r/MensRights24/07/17 12:22 PM
6

It's not about the woman. It's about the law. The laws enable EVERY woman to fuck you over if she wishes to, no matter her character.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 09:57 PM
11

Sounds just like a hyperbole joke to me. A shitty one, but still
/r/MensRights12/07/17 09:06 PM
2

As a member of many feminist groups, it's a shame that all the funding we collect for male rape victims is often rejected by the men we collect it for. Do you have a source for that? Is there a way you can prove your many feminists groups have donated to men's issues? the majority of harrassment towards both men and women comes from men Can you cite the table which shows that this is the case? I couldn't find it This article links a study where the department of investigation found that over 80%…
/r/MensRights12/07/17 08:59 PM
2

Just yesterday we had this three things posted in this sub: https://digest.bps.org.uk/2017/07/11/sexual-offending-by-women-is-surprisingly-common-claims-us-study/ https://scienmag.com/study-finds-sexism-in-sexual-assault-research-but-this-time-men-are-the-target/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6mmp7i/2017_update_to_pews_2014_online_harassment_survey/ Very interesting and highly relevant content that show how needed is it to consider pushing for equal rights for boys and men Its jus…
/r/MensRights12/07/17 07:44 PM
2

The stuff thats upvoted the most here is sometimes petty, but its not what this sub is about. Its just a reddit thing in general that low effort picture posts or gifs get to the top and not the quality content which requires you to read a study.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 07:30 PM
12

I don't know. This was clearly an accident. Or do you want to argue that he is not able to make his own decisions? In my opinion its far fetched to blame her for his death. Of course the way she approached it was totally wrong, but are not to blame for his death. She said she wanted him to work less. The problem is that he felt the need to do that, do you think its the wives fault?
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:21 PM
1

This could have been prevented /s
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:06 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 11:43 AM
15

https://archive.is/bDEFD
/r/MensRights11/07/17 11:30 AM
6

The study: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316614659_Do_the_Mental_Health_Consequences_of_Sexual_Victimization_Differ_Between_Males_and_Females_A_General_Strain_Theory_Approach Edit: posted it in /r/mensrightslinks
/r/MensRights11/07/17 09:30 AM
4

https://archive.is/gGYML please exchange the link to the archived one
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:41 PM
1

There is always at least truth in every conspiracy theory. In this case its: In May 1975, Redstockings, a radical feminist group, published a report on the Vienna Youth Festival that Steinem and others had put together for the Independent Research Service.[92][93] Though she acknowledged having worked for the CIA-financed foundation in the late 1950s and early 1960s in interviews given to the New York Times and Washington Post in 1967 in the wake of the Ramparts magazine CIA exposures (nearly tw…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:16 PM
2

Why don't you answer /u/Mode1961 's questions?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:45 PM
1

Whats your point?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:07 PM
11

This is why it's good for us to have a dialogue. We're both trying to make the world better, just figuring out how. We don't get there if we spend our energies fighting each other. So why do you defend a theory (patriarchy) that blames everything thats bad in the world on male behavior and female oppression? This is gaslighting par excellence! Feminism: Its the fault of men (patriarchy) that the world suffers MRA's: Thats not true, here are reason xyz Feminism: Woh woh woh relax dude, we don't g…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:43 PM
9

"The omnipotent ever present patriarchy. The invisible force, that wrecks all of our lifes and causes all oppression and all suffering. Our devil. And the beautiful wonderful force for justice, feminism. The way, its the way." It sounds like religion. And for a movement thats only about equality and isn't blaming of men, they [feminists] name the force for evil after men and the force for justice after women. And this being a movement that is very very very concerned about the implications of la…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:29 PM
3

I agree! We have to stick to the truth no matter what, and question everything to find it!
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:25 PM
6

I think you need your representatives to be more... representative. Then vote accordingly if the genitals and skin color of your representative is important to you! I'll continue to call that racism and sexism and fight against it! For class its easy, get money out of politics and this will flip! Maybe have a gender-blind hiring policy but give women more incentives to get into politics in the first place until they're equal? A gender blind hiring test for senior positions in australia recently …
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:16 PM
8

I'm aware of male suicide and life loss at work but I think a lot of this is down to the idea that men have to be "strong". But this is largely something men brought on themselves, I think. You should watch this video. It's excellent: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c6CX4uvLK8 Custody is an issue, but men are (statistically speaking) more likely to be dangerous to children. It's more useful to look at what causes men to be like that. Root causes everywhere. "Most studies find that mothers or fe…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:11 PM
7

No, those laws are sexist per definition and would result in a much less qualified and productive workforce. But if this is what society would agree upon, even if I disagree with it, I would want it to be equal in every sector and not only in top positions like CEO's. Aim for 50/50 in education, garbage workers etc. What I can't stand even less than the issue itself is the hypocrisy feminism creates with this issue. And why even stop at men and women? What about race? Should firms be forced to e…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:59 AM
12

I call them out on it. The mrm has some hypocrisy in it too. If I see it, I try to ask leading questions or flip the genders, like I would do with feminists. If you do it in a constructive way around here, you don't get banned for it and people will listen.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:43 AM
5

In what way do you think patriarchal theory doesn't describe the western world when the vast majority of our law-makers and politicians are male? In a democracy all State power emanates from the people. And since women are the biggest demographic group, they hold the most democratic power. That most politicians are men is not a sign of patriarchy, its a sign that male politicians are voted for more often and/or are willing to do this job more often. This will change, when more women start to wan…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:31 AM
12

The following is a very informed and highly reusable comment by Karen Straughan in response to a feminist who thinks the many blatant sexists among feminists aren't real feminists: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousand…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:17 AM
12

Don't be silly
/r/MensRights10/07/17 10:42 AM
5

If the accused has an alibi or the accuser admits the lie for example.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 09:48 PM
5

Have a look here: http://www.mrarchivist.com/results/?item=&topic=False%20Rape&nation=United%20States
/r/MensRights09/07/17 09:46 PM
4

The translation in this case is decent enough to get what they're talking about. Though I have to agree with you, you can't trust the translation in general.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:41 PM
4

There was another article from Rostock some while ago. A police department in Rostock (200k citizens, typical big german city) has come forward in 2015 and said that from 264 solved cases against the "sexual liberty", 8/10 have been made up and that the numbers go up. They said they're mostly lies to cover something up coming from women. It was a policewomen who made that report. https://translate.google.de/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ostsee-zeitung.de%2FRegion-Rostock%2FRosto…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:40 PM
0

You can easily copy the link out of the archive to comment. If you're motivated enough to leave a comment, copying a link won't hold you back. We could encourage people to click on the non archived link in the comment and even deactivate adblock for this particular site.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:15 AM
2

Has this ever happened before? Why would they aim for the mods, and not the user or archive.is? Isn't /r/KotakuInAction using that pretty successful since ever? Sites are more concerned about using archive protection instead of lawsuits, or not? But I can understand that you won't take the risk though. Even if its incredibly small. Not worth it for you I guess. Bummer
/r/MensRights08/07/17 10:29 PM
4

Option 4 - Only accept archived links for every site. Direct link can be posted in the comments. People are asking for this since ever. Reminding people to only use archive or images doesn't work. Users posting the archived version in the comments doesn't work. I am more concerned about that /r/MensRights can be lumped in with the alt-right even more. This leaves me against option 1 even though what CNN did was completely out of the line.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 09:44 PM
5

What an excellent video!
/r/MensRights08/07/17 07:34 PM
5

I haven't seen the film you mentioned, but if the message of it is that men kill themselves more often because they don't talk about their feelings enough, I disagree with it. Its not the main reason at all, I would say its not even in the top 5 of factors why men commit suicide. If I would have to guess, I would say men commit suicide because of: mental illness (men are the experimental sex, wider bellcurve) no job/homelessness (men are more work oriented, self worth is often dependent on workp…
/r/MensRights08/07/17 07:16 PM
4

Don't marry!
/r/MensRights07/07/17 09:21 PM
1

I agree. I just wanted to say that this thought is not that far away and can understand if someone at least raises that question.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 09:00 PM
2

You can't start new projects as a new user. Seems you have to get accredited somehow to get access to that.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 06:15 PM
3

Support the organizations that support our rights. Donate: https://www.thefire.org/donate/
/r/MensRights07/07/17 03:28 PM
1

A police department in germany (Rostock 200k citizens, typical big german city) has come forward in 2015 and said that from 264 solved cases against the "sexual liberty", 8/10 have been made up and that the numbers go up. They said they're mostly lies to cover something up coming from women. It was a policewomen who made that report. http://www.ostsee-zeitung.de/Region-Rostock/Rostock/Acht-von-zehn-Vergewaltigungen-sind-vorgetaeuscht (german link) The police in germany is by law inclined to be p…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 02:33 PM
3

Can you point me to 2 or 3 posts which reached r/all that you found to be misogynistic?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:49 PM
7

You know there is a sub especially obsessed being "againstmensrights"? The mods from there frequent subs like SRS or are even mods there. Its not that far fetched to come up with this conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:23 PM
1

Yes its a problem. And immensely frustrating when you have to defend the need for the mrm when people from r/all flood the post. To explain that there are legitimate and important issues is exhausting. I also have this silly conspiracy theory, that on top of the mra's upvoting these low effort posts out of convenience, there are also those who want to hurt our cause who are upvoting it too.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:20 PM
1

Whats ML?
/r/MensRights06/07/17 10:16 PM
3

It's hard to see a statement that is such a blatant lie and not react. I just wanted to offer another perspective, for more even minded people maybe overlooking this sub, in a polite way. It was a mistake, they're clearly beyond reason.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 07:29 PM
2

Yes you're right. Well I guess that's where she comes back into the picture. And yes, state legalized and regulated prostitution is a win-win-win. Sad feminists are rallying against it again in europe. Criminalizing only the men is the most ridiculous thing feminists could've come up with. They'll never be satisfied until every human with a penis is in prison.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 06:49 PM
9

A very interesting and unique thought. I'm inclined to agree with you on that. Many things people throw at others is pure projection. The thought of anti-gay conservative legislators who come out as gay comes to my mind. And that opens the uncomfortable question, is the mrm projecting something deeper too? Or is this still just the reaction to feminism? But I guess we won't find out. If you haven't seen it, I'd like to recommend this excellent discussion on rape culture: https://www.youtube.com/…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 06:23 PM
3

Let me assure you, this is a great loss that brings a lot of pain as we were brought up to expect that we would have that one day. Therefore, there is a grieving process. I know and understand that. I have felt the same anger too. And I even understand the need to vent. I would go as far as saying its important for men to vent. Its a way to let go of anger. But whats missing are the self correcting voices who put that all into perspective.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 06:06 PM
7

That place is a toxic cesspool. I agree. The MGTOW sub is full of simple hate and disgust for women: Women aren't part of the nation [They are resource like coal or oil.] Women are fucking boring Fuck women And thats just from 1 day. I doubt that anybody from there would actually act out his hate other than simply ignoring women though. They're mostly just venting. I support everyone who's saying, "fuck it" I don't want anything to do with them because like you said the legal system makes it an …
/r/MensRights05/07/17 04:08 PM
3

This is a well-studied, scientific phenomena ... proceeds to link to everydayfeminism.com and other radical feminist websites. haha
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:04 PM
6

Young women already make 8% more than young men http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3214854/Pay-gap-Women-earn-men-till-40s-20-woman-paid-men-age-group-decade.html
/r/MensRights05/07/17 10:15 AM
6

We need clean, legal, regulated whorehouses. Now. This will bring even more reality into the mating market. There are many clean, legal and regulated whorehouses in the world. In germany for example, there is the pascha in cologne or the paradise in stuttgart. A free prostitution market doesn't change much I would say. Its the right step, but it's no solution to any problem. Most men still don't want to fuck prostitutes. Most men just want real intimacy and a real connection to another human bei…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:33 AM
17

Two interesting studies from /r/mensrightslinks : Source as full study Abstract: Sexual dimorphism in sociability has been documented in humans. The present study aimed to ascertain whether the sexual dimorphism is a result of biological or socio-cultural differences between the two sexes. 102 human neonates, who by definition have not yet been influenced by social and cultural factors, were tested to see if there was a difference in looking time at a face (social object) and a mobile (physical-…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/17 10:04 PM
11

Get a lawyer Document this behavior somehow Go to HR If they don't help you or fire you, sue your company Profit
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:12 PM
1

I see. It's not a must see. This video is even more aimed at women if you ask me.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:11 PM
1

You can't watch the video? I would say the video is definitely not sexist or redpill content. It's a lie
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:03 PM
1

For example: what fraction of the time does a father get custody when it's contested? Yes, this is a legitimit criticism I often hear from feminists. When fathers contest custody, they receive it. I doubt this. But even if, there are many things wrong with this argument. For example it doesn't take into account that men might not want to contest custody because they know they're are without a chance. Or they know it costs a lot of money. I have watched this video posted in againstmensrights http…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 08:38 PM
1

Just got a message from a mod: It received user reports for sexism and being red pill content.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 08:36 PM
1

Posted this video in r/deadbedrooms because I thought it might fit there. But it got deleted
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:22 PM
2

there are more important issues with men than getting out of the friendzone or being unable to get laid. Where did you get the impression that this is whats discussed here? It's not. While Lethn is very antagonizing with how he formulates his argument I have to agree with him on the matter. Also stop telling men to show their emotions. It's condescending, because it's not that men wouldn't like to show their emotions, it's that they gain nothing by doing it. On top of that, the majority of men j…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:21 PM
2

While you're right and this video is factually bullshit, its just a satire of the manosphere. Sometimes its good to laugh about yourself and detach from the issues.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 03:32 PM
2

And by the way, if you want to persuade someone on this matter. Make an emotional anecdotal argument first and back it up with facts later. The facts have always been there, nobody cares. But people may care to listen when you tell the story about little Timmy who lost his father through a custody battle and failed in school because of a lacking male role model etc.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 02:46 PM
11

Is it technically possible for a person to get raped and afterwards still wanting to meet the rapist? Yes! Is it unlikely? Yes! Can it therefore be evidence that no rape has occurred? No! Can it be an indication that there is doubt about the rape? Yes!
/r/MensRights04/07/17 02:34 PM
8

http://tomjameslaw.com/blog/what-judges-really-think-about-fathers-responses-to-court-commissioned-judicial-bias-surveys/#fnref-853-2 and http://ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1419&context=lr CONCLUSION The evidence is overwhelming and demands that we re-examine the wisdom of conventional custody. Unless you believe that a father’s value to his children diminishes after divorce, it is hard to justify a custody policy that routinely and automatically disrupts the divorced father’s rel…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 01:41 PM
3

There are 272 cases freed by the innocence project convicted for "sex crimes": https://www.innocenceproject.org/all-cases/#sex-crimes,exonerated-by-dna
/r/MensRights04/07/17 10:47 AM
24

Phimosis misdiagnosis I had the same "issue" as a child. And got the same misdiagnosis as described in this article. The "problem" solved "itself" when I grew up. Its a total normal body function. The foreskin is there to protect the glans. Boys don't have a use for their penises except urinating until after puberty, which is the time when this issue will solve itself.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:52 PM
1

I totally agree. The post should argue against the double standard
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:40 PM
6

Finally we can reduce the female population to a healthy 10% /s
/r/MensRights02/07/17 09:53 PM
1

POE's law
/r/MensRights02/07/17 09:49 PM
11

How old is this? 25 years? And these power hungry career feminists are still grinding the same stupid argument to gain power. Frustrating
/r/MensRights02/07/17 09:37 PM
32

No they don't. They're making a fucking joke! Yes violence against men in a joke can be funny, yes rape jokes can be funny. This is petty
/r/MensRights02/07/17 09:30 PM
5

It always boils down to this: http://i.imgur.com/aF8eTQf.jpg And it sadly works everytime I agree with everything you say, especially because you don't agree with his reaction.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:12 PM
4

I posted this article on r/nottheonion, of course it got censored for not being "oniony" even though, the irony of this headline is extraordinary. Obviously there is someone who can't risk to damage the narrative. https://www.reddit.com/r/nottheonion/comments/6keohw/blind_recruitment_trial_to_boost_gender_equality/
/r/MensRights30/06/17 11:18 AM
2

Rule 5) AskReddit is not your soapbox, personal army, or advertising platform. Posts attempting to promote a specific agenda of yours or anyone else, to gain publicity, promote a cause or charity drive, or to publicly shame a person or entity will be removed. Rhetorical and loaded questions will also be removed. Posts asking users to shame or call out specific people or groups of people will be removed because they lead to witchhunting rather than discussion. This isn't a place to recruit member…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 07:13 PM
8

/r/mensrightslinks www.mrarchivist.com /r/MRRef and register yourself at www.mhraconnect.com, a platform for activism. It has just recently started so don't expect anything revolutionary just now, help spread the word and it will build up
/r/MensRights29/06/17 12:16 PM
4

Which makes you a literal sexist in the eyes of women: https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/handle/10012/6958 The low benevolent sexist male target (compared to high benevolent sexist male target) was judged to be higher on hostile sexism, less supportive of female professionals, less good of father and husband, and more likely to perpetrate domestic violence. If you treat women equal to men, you're seen as a sexist.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:10 AM
1

The instructor is portrayed as a whimp. Not that men should never be depicted as whimps anymore but its a trope.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 07:57 AM
7

Thats what you get when single "parents" are to weak to enforce boundaries with their kids
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:52 PM
8

https://i.redditmedia.com/d9E89SpkBXzFkRziCdkWEVH7ZTkYEws391M1l4zPK4w.jpg?w=320&s=6cdf780d106e270e7e1fa70e3cadd42a
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:46 PM
1

An "/s" would've been helpful
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:37 PM
2

Do you really believe that you're a reptile?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:21 PM
50

Symbolic. I mean how obvious can it get for society to realize that men are second class citizens, or women are the special gender?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:14 PM
5

I don't want to say rape jokes can't be funny, obviously they can, but you should know there are innocent people in prison. That means innocent people getting raped. The innocence project has exonerated 350 people out of prison https://www.innocenceproject.org/all-cases/#exonerated-by-dna Most innocent people they freed have been men falsely accused of rape. Ironic isn't it?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:34 PM
3

Most of these 'cries for justice' appear to me to come from these reprehensible players from the pick up artist community. You are simply wrong. when these very statutes were brought into play in the first place because these scumbags were seducing naive underage girls And now you're accusing people in this sub of seducing underage girls? What is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:24 PM
2

Did you know that a murder with a female victim is around 60% more likely to result in a death sentence, (related graph). Not only are female victims treated as more valuable, even female perpetrators are treated more lenient. Women guilty of capital murder are far less likely than men to be sentenced to death. And not to forget that men in general get 60% longer prison sentences than women in federal crime cases for the same crime. On top of that, men are more likely to get prosecuted at all.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:02 PM
5

He should have just married his rapist
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:54 PM
5

Well, it IS worded differently most of the time! This is an exception. The word "RAPE" sells better with the word "man" nearby, and the word "sex" sells better with the word "woman". This shouldn't be a surprise for anybody, doesn't make it not a double standard.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:48 PM
5

Other than "it seems to follow" and anecdote I would love a credible medical source about sex post-childbirth. Me too. After some reading of mother blogs, every one of them said something in the line of this The million-dollar question every woman wants to know: “Will my vagina be the same after birth?” Though this may not be quite what you want to hear, the answer is: not exactly. But it may be very close! One of the great things about the vagina is that it has not only the elasticity to expand…
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:42 PM
3

This exact type of conversation is why people are somewhere between dismissive and hostile of men's rights. Oh come on. This is a totally different issue that has nothing to do with mens rights. Its a quite obvious conclusion that someone could come to that women are stretched out after child birth, or not?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:17 PM
2

She is right, there is something really fishy about this: https://www.crtv.com/video/s1e1++daniel+in+the+den++the+truth+about+the+holtzclaw+case+part+1#sthash.fhaDECC3.dpbs
/r/MensRights28/06/17 12:52 PM
1

A biased documentary from Al Jazeera shows what this is about: http://players.brightcove.net/665003303001/SJg0bzqkZ_default/index.html?videoId=5397176770001&autoplay
/r/MensRights28/06/17 12:45 PM
4

If the rates for murder of men go down and go on par with that of women, feminists will go crazy! They would claim that murder rates of women as high as mens is a sign of misogyny! As they do in South Korea. Watch this AlJezeera Doc to get an idea what I am talking about. https://www.theatlas.com/i/atlas_rkS-Hfq6.png They claim high percentages of women killed is a sign of misogyny. But the truth is, these countries have the lowest homicide rates in the world overall: Hongkong 0.3 per 100.000 Ja…
/r/MensRights28/06/17 11:59 AM
8

I know that. But she is using this to provoke a reaction and promote her book. She knows she gets attention with the killallmen thing from past interactions. If you've seen the hack life video about male privilege, she is scrutinized for her remarks on the show. She knows what shes doing. She even "just" asked a question, not making a statement. So technically she didn't write anything wrong or illegal. This is a classical deliberate move.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:34 PM
1

NSFL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvW2b9ujdWo&t=22s
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:12 PM
9

This is probably a publicity stunt. She is betting on the streisand effect and we're doing her the favor. Ignore her book, don't share this article
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:04 PM
1

How is pushing and prodding and manoeuvring women into STEM going to fix anything It fixes and secures the jobs of career feminists. There are people who are depended on making up problems. Without these problems, there would be no reason for their existence.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 11:00 AM
12

Awesome that you stood up for yourself! And kudos to the assistance principal for taking your complaint serious! Do you know how long this girl got suspended?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 10:18 AM
2

please edit your link into https://np.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/6jkcfa/please_help_2_12_year_old_daughter_told_me_that/ Its against the rules to post direct links because of brigading. Her comment history is gold mine, especially this one: Askreddit thread: "[Serious]What is the most difficult thing you've had to accept about the other person in a relationship?": Being a pathological liar. The thing was.. He didn't lie about important shit.. It was always trivial & not that big of a deal…
/r/MensRights26/06/17 07:39 PM
1

Check this chart to see if its legal to take audio recordings in your state. https://www.mwl-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/LAWS-ON-RECORDING-CONVERSATIONS-CHART.pdf
/r/MensRights26/06/17 12:06 PM
1

The true story its based on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desmond_Doyle
/r/MensRights26/06/17 09:05 AM
5

Thats because of youtubes (and social media in general) echo chamber algorithm only presenting you what you already like. Its a serious issue on the internet. People don't get exposed to different ideas anymore since they only selectively consume what they already like.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 07:40 PM
45

We need more real world activism Edit: www.mhraconnect.com is a good way to start
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:58 PM
5

This thread sums it up
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:47 PM
9

medusamagazine is a fake site. It's fake outrage porn. If integrity is worth anything to you, you should think about deleting your post
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:38 PM
1

/u/sirskeptic made it. He made a post about it, and it was stickied some days ago I guess the first step for it is to grow its userbase.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:06 PM
2

Have a look at www.mhraconnect.com It is a platform for projects and activism around mens human rights. Its just started and is building a memberbase The concept looks interesting and promising
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:47 PM
2

If you push someone in a corner with nowhere to go, you leave him no other chance than to attack.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 01:34 PM
3

I plan on requesting shared custody with as close to 50/50 time as is practical and I want to be named the custodial parent. My sons mother has shown to be unreasonable when it comes to conparenting and rarely does whats in his best interest. This is a reasonable plan. I find it exemplary that you won't try to deprive your kids their mother completely. Your kids need their mother as much as they need you
/r/MensRights25/06/17 11:12 AM
5

Thanks for pointing this out. There is a strong bias in that definition. But there are some things wrong and misleading within your post. You can't compare foreskin and clitoris, you can compare the glans to the clitoris, or the foreskin to the clitoral hood. They are homologous (wiki link) Saying "especially under a man's foreskin" doesn't translate to "evidently women don't get it" Saying "retractable roll of skin" doesn't exclude "nerves or any function" It doesn't say circumcision is a "righ…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 10:26 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6hn6b5/breaking_news_michelle_carter_found_guilty_of/
/r/MensRights25/06/17 09:16 AM
2

Checked your history, you're a poster on the_d? No seriously, what is your argument?
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:54 PM
5

I just got the impression that they claim they focus on exploring how women REALLY operate and are taking advantage of that knowledge. They translate their knowledge into generalized advise on how all women behave the same. The term "AWALT" (all women a like that) is an example of that. And since generalizing is not always a good idea, I get how people are upset. I don't have a specific example for "exploitation" though. Have you got another impression of them?
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:12 PM
5

What a convincing argument
/r/MensRights24/06/17 01:40 PM
3

No problem. But even if such a rule existed, my post wouldn't have infringed upon that rule. It had nothing to do with when or mens rights, it was just scientific evidence which proves that gender is at least in part biological predetermined. Contrary evidence to the believe that gender is a social construct.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 01:38 PM
1

The last rule about posting reads: respect the "assume good faith" principle the last rule about debating is: all ideological considerations must contribute to understanding the feminist perspective, and be consistent with an attitude of encouragement towards further learning. What rule do you mean, and if you meant one of the above mentioned, how does it apply to my post?
/r/MensRights24/06/17 01:13 PM
7

The producer of the movie Cassie Jaye has been criticized for using that name as title for her movie. But she made a decent job explaining why she used it in the movie itself. It's not your fault, its pretty easy to misconstrue all those topics. Edit: Before I forget it to mention, I have been banned from the feminism sub for just posting this scientific study on there. The study said: Results showed that the male infants showed a stronger interest in the physical-mechanical mobile while the fem…
/r/MensRights24/06/17 12:20 PM
4

No matter how afraid you are of your own life, you can't just shoot another human being just on suspicion. If the guy didn't reach for his gun, and the cop has shot him without ever seeing a gun in his hand, he is guilty of manslaughter in my taste. I don't think a sentence of 15 years would have been a reasonable punishment for him though.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 12:07 PM
33

r/theredpill has nothing to do with mens rights. Their goal is to exploit how society and humans function for personal gain on the sexual market. A suggestion would be, make the same post on both r/feminism and on r/theredpill and see what happens. If you want to get "our" side, watch this movie: http://theredpillmovie.com/ you can buy it on many sites. It gives a good overview on why it is so difficult to be an mra and what it is about. Here is a trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLzeakK…
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:43 AM
5

You can listen to two of their songs here: Dream Machine - "I Walked In The Fire" Dream Machine - "All For A Chance"
/r/MensRights24/06/17 10:34 AM
13

There are times I just can't muster any compassion at all for the females of our species. You know we got to this point in history because of feminists saying the exact same thing about men? Please consider that its not the fault of these girls that society treats men like second class citizens.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 10:15 AM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/18tv7j/i_am_warren_farrell_author_of_why_men_are_the_way/
/r/MensRights24/06/17 08:54 AM
3

You could upload it on any feminist sub, replace the first page with the word "Misogyny", and they would unironically claim this work shows how wrong and evil mens rights activists are and how they push women to internalize misogyny. They would not be able to see the problem, I bet it. You really managed to capture a typical discussion many mra's had with feminists, good job.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:15 PM
2

Yes, you're correct. "rejection of BS" or "low BS" as described in the study is interpreted as equality by the user who made that quote. I guess its for the simplicity of the argument. I made an edit in the post to highlight that its not a quote from the study.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 01:20 PM
2

The quote is not from the study. Its a text I found on here from another user in which he described the study in his own words. I guess he interpreted the part "rejection of BS" or "low BS" as equality for the sake of simplicity (BS = benevolent sexism, HS = hostile sexism). Quote from the study's conclusion: Two studies demonstrated that lay people misperceive the relationship between hostile sexism (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS) in men, but not in women. While men's endorsement of BS is viewe…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 01:13 PM
1

Have a look on: /r/MRRef /r/mensrightslinks www.mrarchivist.com If you find anything interesting thats not included in the above, make sure to add them.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 07:29 AM
395

TIL that this is literally true: Research exposed women to three types of behaviours: Hostile Sexism (which is what people normally think of when they hear the word 'sexism'), Equality (i.e. treating women exactly the same as men) and Benevolent Sexism (i.e. giving women advantages and preferential treatment on the assumption that they are less capable than men). The interesting thing is that the women in the study considered Equality to be the same as Hostile Sexism, i.e. misogynistic & sexist …
/r/MensRights22/06/17 09:13 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6ipqq7/sexism_on_college_campuses_is_unbelievable/dj8g6xr/
/r/MensRights22/06/17 04:55 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6ipqq7/sexism_on_college_campuses_is_unbelievable/dj8g6xr/
/r/MensRights22/06/17 04:51 PM
4

You're right. Women rape as often as men, or as feminists say it "made to penetrate" http://i.imgur.com/wBTDfe7.png That's from the Bureau of Justice Statistics a few years back. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/ Where as black people are more often criminal in relation to the population as white people. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf So you're correct, the two are not equally probable.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 04:42 PM
6

Yes. My glans is not as numb in comparison to my foreskin as the back of my hand is in comparison to my palm though. Its a different feeling. I actually don't even like the sensation of dry skin on my glans, it feels somehow a bit to much, to sensitive, not easy to describe it.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 04:32 PM
2

This study might interest you: Results showed that the male infants showed a stronger interest in the physical-mechanical mobile while the female infants showed a stronger interest in the face. The results of this research clearly demonstrate that sex differences are in part biological in origin http://www.math.kth.se/matstat/gru/godis/sex.pdf Me posting it on r/feminism was the reason I got banned there.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 04:16 PM
13

Do intact men agree with the diagram? When I first heard that the foreskin is the most sensitive part I couldn't believe it. But when I tested it myself I was surprised. My foreskin feels more sensitive, but its a different kind of sensitive. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
/r/MensRights22/06/17 03:58 PM
3

The author of this article isn't red pilled in the slightest though. She still views everything through a feminist lens.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 12:54 PM
6

It seems to me that one of the panelists is Naomi Wolf. Her perspective hasn't changed in over 20 years. Here is a talk with her and Karen Straughan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5z7nteHMPJ8
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:09 AM
23

No its not ok to discriminate between different groups of people! WTF? And even if it were, it would not be an appropriate treatment, because women "rape" men in similarly rates as men rape women. http://i.imgur.com/wBTDfe7.png That's from the Bureau of Justice Statistics a few years back. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/
/r/MensRights22/06/17 10:49 AM
12

For the basic fact that I probably can't afford one You can't afford to have NO lawyer even less
/r/MensRights22/06/17 10:39 AM
7

Well, officially they can't. Men can only "made to be penetrated" Thanks to feminists, for it to be considered rape, it needs vaginal or anal penetration. It has been redefined to further an agenda. https://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/cdc-being-made-to-penetrate-isnt-rape/ https://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2015/09/05/mary-koss-doesnt-think-women-can-rape-men-and-boys/
/r/MensRights22/06/17 10:18 AM
12

I love how you don't deny reality upon finding new evidence which contradicts your before held opinion. Thanks for being open minded and thinking for yourself. I almost can't believe those statistics myself. I would love to see continuing research done on this topic, since only since recently, men are beginning to report abuse more often.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 10:09 AM
18

OP, /u/Cloudy_Wealth said: It is Northeast Mississippi Community College, and yes I took the photo a couple hours before posting the picture. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6ipqq7/sexism_on_college_campuses_is_unbelievable/dj897x8/
/r/MensRights22/06/17 09:52 AM
7

We all should be under the umbrella that is human rights. Feminists made that impossible.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 07:03 PM
5

In general it should be possible to talk about the gender that is effected not as often, but still has special needs specific to its gender. Take homelessness for example. Men are effected much more often, yet homeless women are in need for special sanitary accessories which they often can't afford. People should be able to talk about that without being unnecessarily derailed. Though we don't talk about mens issues enough, its much more often the other way around. Feminists gaslight often enough…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 05:50 PM
8

True. But that shouldn't hold us back from doing what is right.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:59 PM
76

Mens rights includes everyone with an Y-Chromosome, a penis or even everyone who identifies as male as much as I care, no matter their skin color or sexual orientation! Is there a need to make this about race or sexuality? I would argue no, there isn't. I accept the claim that mens rights issues sometimes "derail" another discussion though, i've seen it happen. But it mostly happens were false narratives or statistics and stuff like that comes from feminists. Still, there are times when "what ab…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:40 PM
2

This is misleading. In germany one parent can get paid time off 12 months long, no matter if you're a father or a mother. If more than one parent takes time off, they can get 14 month which can be distributed how they want. Its pretty awesome. Every parent has the possibility to take off 36 month unpaid leave including the paid time.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:27 PM
1

See /r/menkampf or /r/StormfrontorSJW Google Jessica Valenti male tears, Julie Bindel and Clementine Ford, NOW and joint custody
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:38 PM
19

Yes, you're right! Everything you've written is factually correct. I have misinterpreted something else into it. Though its good that i clarified that making a secret test is not allowed. The situation seems actually pretty similar to france, but the punishments are not as severe in germany. And I don't know if you are allowed to do a test with the consent of the mother.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:34 PM
30

Pros: It would prevent false fatherhood, its estimated it happens in somewhere around 10% of all cases. If you demand a test as a father, you're seen as paranoid. It would take that burden of you. Everybody looses in case of a wrongful paternity. The child, the father, the state and the mother. Around 30% of all paternity tests that are made come back negative It would prevent babies switched at birth in the hospital. Which is by the way an excellent reason, you can present the mother if you wan…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:21 PM
2

Made a post about the legal ramifications in germany regarding questioning paternity above in this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6ikeqx/just_remember_guys_this_is_the_real_reason/dj770fk/
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:08 PM
41

You can order a paternity test via internet, telephone, fax, even telegraph if you wish so. No, you can't have a secret test. Its handled as a misdemeanor (Ordnungswidrigkeit) where you have to pay up to 5000€ if you're caught. Law for genetical investigation in humans (Gesetz über genetische Untersuchungen bei Menschen) unfortunately not available in english http://www.kanzlei-hasselbach.de/2015/wann-eine-vaterschaftsanfechtung-sinn-macht/07/ But you're right, you can do a test with the mothers…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:43 PM
8

Was the link there when I asked? Your post hasn't any sign that you changed it. Or am I going crazy? For everyone interested and speaking german: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/__1600.html §§1600 and following regulates paternity claims. You can contest your paternity within 2 years of knowing information that could lead you to contest paternity. For that you need reasonable evidence that you might not be the father. You CAN'T make a paternity test without the consent of the child or its …
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:40 PM
2

I know, thats part of why I am here, to change that. Both is wrong.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:18 PM
1

(yeah, right, she knew the box hadn't been opened) Your reading comprehension sucks. You obviously read into it what you wanted to read. She wrote: We were making out passionately and then suddenly he stuck it inside me.** The box of condoms were next to us so I assumed he had placed one on**, but I wasn't so sure and I looked up at him. His responses were different, and so I asked, "did you...?" and he just told me, "just see how it feels, give it a second." And I was horrified that he might ha…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:15 PM
0

It would be equally or even more wrong, because the intention behind this is much worse. An unbiased fair court should decide if this constitutes sexual assault.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:04 PM
1

But she let it happen, and then stopped it part of the way into it once she changed her mind. Where did you get that from? She wrote: We were making out passionately and then suddenly he stuck it inside me. The box of condoms were next to us so I assumed he had placed one on, but I wasn't so sure and I looked up at him. His responses were different, and so I asked, "did you...?" and he just told me, "just see how it feels, give it a second." And I was horrified that he might have just done it wi…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:00 PM
2

She willingly admitted to "letting" him put "just the tip" in. She wrote: It came to my mind that the way we first started having sex was very similar. I had told him that I didn't want to have sex because I didn't believe in having sex before marriage, due to a traditional upbringing. Over the course of a few months he gradually found his way in with the whole dumb "just the tip" trick It was not the same situation. She made it sound like she allowed it back when they first started having sex. …
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:41 PM
4

She explicitly states she permitted him to enter her without a condom. She did the exact opposite of that.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:43 AM
1

I told him I wasn't interested in the risk. I let things cool a little and told him straight up, " Look, the idea of having unprotected sex seems pleasurable, but I don't want to run the risks involve with it." I just told him "well everyone has different values and I'm not interested." So he agreed I don't know what he did is, but its NOT OK. If the things happened as she described them, she made it absolutely clear that she doesn't want to have unprotected sex and he willingly disregarded her …
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:41 AM
7

Germany may do the same. Do you have a source for that?
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:59 AM
5

She just used a "friend" instead of her own child She literally did use his death: Tweet1, Tweet 2 Their whole conversations can be found here
/r/MensRights20/06/17 10:36 PM
1

Thats always a good rule!
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:33 PM
1

Alabama is a one party consent state, which means you are able to record all of your conversations. As I said, if you ever find yourself in a sketchy situation where you have the feeling something is wrong, draw your phone and start recording your conversation. But as the other said, things are blown out of proportion. People and women in general are not out to get you and are just looking for a good time.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:29 PM
1

Getting accused of rape is very unlikely. But still you wouldn't hide under a tree during a thunderstorm, so just don't date feminists and the chances of being accused go down! If possible don't date girls from your college in general, because they have the power to destroy your education through those kangaroo courts on campus. If you have sex, always bring your own protection and use it! Don't rely on anyone for your birth control! Getting a girl pregnant you don't want to spent your future wi…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:19 PM
1

Basicly Sexodus Societies backbone and economic strength is based on men channeling their sexual energy for labor. If rewards for doing that continue to decline and are replaced by cheap and easier replacements like virtual reality for example, it will be difficult. Women can replace mens workforce, but then reproduction will suffer. Automation may be a "solution" and make manual labor normally done by men obsolete, time will tell. Black Pigeon Speaks draws some relatively dark (and sometimes cl…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 06:24 PM
1

mainstream feminism is neoliberalism (free market capitalism) - that is the ideology behind the ideology. I've always heard the authoritarian left / marxism is behind third wave feminism. How are their policies based on neoliberalism?
/r/MensRights20/06/17 06:10 PM
2

Woman quotas at work isn't the absolute worst thing Germany and other scandinavian countries have or had these quotas. In germany, the highest court has ruled them as unconstitutional because its illegal discrimination (who could have thought that). So even if they pass, there is hope.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:39 PM
3

The law on these types of cases is very complicated and changing. You should talk to a lawyer if you want to move away with your children or if you are worried that the other parent will move away with your children [..]If the parents have joint physical custody of the children and 1 parent does not want the child to move, the parent that wants to move with the children must show the court that the move is in the best interest of the children. Keep in mind that, although the physical custody lab…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:32 PM
44

Illegal in the UK. Just pointless to fight. If you consider yourself an mra, its not pointless to fight. Thats because we're here, right?
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:34 PM
1

Step 0.1: Make a profile as a woman and use an acronym for your first name. Step 0.2: Apply Step 0.3: If you're accepted and get there the first time, continue with Step 1
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:33 PM
26

Step 1: Check the recording laws in the UK. Buy a recording device and record every following interaction Step 2: Go to the manager and ask to hand over your application. Step 3: If you are rejected because of your gender, sue. Step 4: Profit.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:28 PM
17

Money isn't the only way to contribute to a marriage. So how much is the earner paid in the "other contribution" after divorce? How can he be able to raise kids 50%, do his household AND go to work all together, if 2 people were necessary for that before. Oh I forgot, he doesn't get the kids. When it comes to custody of children, money is suddenly obviously NO WAY to contribute to their care when you follow the reasoning of the courts. Because, in the marriage, we chose to take different roles, …
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:21 PM
2

Perhaps so. I don't know. They admit their bias several times in this study and are even surprised by their results. This would suggest /u/HiilestTehtyAffena is more right than wrong.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 12:16 PM
7

I'd like to see what people's thoughts are if the feminists manage to take over here as well What do you mean with "here"? This sub is full of mra's from all around the world Edit: And at what point would you leave your country? What legislation would be necessary for that?
/r/MensRights20/06/17 11:14 AM
1

Yes, its condescending as hell! Stop telling men to show their emotions!
/r/MensRights20/06/17 11:04 AM
5

The “unfounded” rate, or percentage of complaints determined through investigation to be false, is higher for forcible rape than for any other Index crime. Eight percent of forcible rape complaints in 1996 were “unfounded,” while the average for all Index crimes was 2 percent. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/1996/96sec2.pdf (Page 24)
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:30 AM
16

Karen Straughan - Why marriage is to risky for men
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:22 AM
2

Houston hovers close to 90% humidity "This city should not exist. It is a monument to man's arrogance."
/r/MensRights20/06/17 12:04 AM
44

A recent meta-analysis found that a woman’s perpetration of violence was the strongest predictor of her being a victim of partner violence. Injury is an important factor, but the gender is not as significant as I thought it to be, womens ipv results 2/3 as often in injury as male ipv: For injury occurrence, both perpetrator gender and reciprocity were significant predictors, but the interaction was not significant. Injury was more likely when violence was perpetrated by men than by women (men=28…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 11:59 PM
1

Honestly, this sub is almost as bad as what they hate, feminism. Go and try saying that on /r/Feminism. Actually go and try saying anything like that on any feminist sub and see what happens. You'll get banned. The fact that you're able to call things out you don't agree with on this sub is a huge difference "Their trend is stupid and hurtful, so I'm gonna start the same one." Wtf guys. Thats not the point of this at all.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:42 PM
1

Sit with your buttcheeks on the edge of a chair. Put your legs parallel and your feet on the ground. And then relax all muscles in your legs and see what happens with them. They magically go apart. Source: Yourself
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:37 PM
1

You didn't even respond to one of my arguments since the beginning of our discussion "you fucking idiot". Do you always go around and insult people you speak with?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 02:00 PM
1

This sub is supposed to be discussions about real issues. Feminist lobbying has recently resulted in a campaign against manspreading on the madrid subway. Manspreading got a "real issue" pretty fast, because nobody is doing anything against those crazies radical feminist. They're pushing for legislation all around the globe. This manspreading issue is just the tip of it. You are still able to discuss more important issues, which I agree there are a lot of them. But this doesn't make this not a v…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 01:49 PM
1

Its not about feminists getting mad anymore. Their lobbying has resulted in gendered campaigns on trains against manspreading. This post is just pointing out the irony in that
/r/MensRights19/06/17 01:46 PM
1

you fucking idiot. Well i guess i have to take my "have a nice day" back. Found the feminist. I shouldn't bite, but i'll do, the photo says "Dude" which makes it clearly a gendered sign. Of course it is a space issue, what else should it be, "you fucking idiot"? I am banned rom the feminist sub for this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/5zbmmd/study_proves_sex_differences_are_in_part/ entailing this study: http://www.math.kth.se/matstat/gru/godis/sex.pdf which argued "Results show…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 01:43 PM
3

and it's gotten to the point where the only reason so many people even know about it is because of /r/menrights. Don't you get it? Its now fucking policy in different parts of the world because of feminist lobbying for this issue and you tell me to chill? No! https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/mta1.jpg?quality=90&strip=all Are there more important issues? Yes! Is this still an issue worth pointing out? Yes! Holy shit dude. This is going in circles. You're right. I guess we both said e…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 01:15 PM
19

Many buildings in northern europe are not equiped with air conditioning. On top of that the climate is different, i've heard the humidity is higher, so 34C may feel different in the uk than in texas e.g. And on top of that people are simply not adapted to such temperatures.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:24 PM
3

That this sub chooses to focus on really unimportant non-issues It doesn't though, like I described in my previous post "the fact that this low effort rage content gets upvoted easily to the top is by no means an indication of the importance of the issue" This issue just clicks all the boxes for popularity. You don't get how reddit works if you think that is an indication about what the mrm thinks is important. And being against the gendered "manspreading" thing by mocking it is totally legit fo…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:19 PM
7

In the same way they blame sexism for the wage gap instead of womens choices
/r/MensRights19/06/17 11:44 AM
1

First, thank you for your work. It seems to me this project is what this movement needs, more activism and a platform we can trust to discuss projects. If it is what you promise it is, its awesome. But please don't take skepticism and criticism as a sign of disapproval, its not. I am actually willing to sign up. it's being endorsed by Mike Buccanan and Marc Angelucci and Men's Rights Sydney. Hannah Wallen is the US admin and Nick Redding is the Canadian admin. https://j4mb.org.uk/2017/06/18/mhra…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 11:29 AM
1

This project is an awesome idea, but I couldn't find who is responsible for it. I hoped this is somehow linked to a prominent figure of the mrm
/r/MensRights19/06/17 10:46 AM
1

Who is publishing that? How do I know I can trust them?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 10:22 AM
33

The world is going slowly into the dystopian future the movies I watched in my childhood depicted. Its just that this is coming from the other side of the political spectrum.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 10:11 AM
15

Are you talking about /r/TwoXChromosomes? Because this is their top post right now: https://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/6i00t4/thanks_dad/ which is awesome
/r/MensRights19/06/17 10:02 AM
4

doesn't think it achieves anything to focus on such a small part of feminist rhetoric There is no focus on this issue. The focus of the mrm is on circumcision, custody and fathers rights, divorce laws and boys education. There was actually an International Conference on Mens Issues (icmi.info) a few days ago where they talked about those important issues. If you didn't get that, your bad. That doesn't mean you can't denounce bullshit like manspreading here in the meantime. And the fact that this…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 09:49 AM
7

Canada is fucked
/r/MensRights19/06/17 08:57 AM
6

Its frequently at the top because its a low effort rage post. Shit like that ALWAYS lands on the top in every sub. I explained to you yesterday why your POV is not quite right and you're still "playing devils advocate" around here? What do you have against men sitting comfortable?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 08:51 AM
1

Do you disagree with me? Would you not move if you were taking up yours and the last available seat? Of course I would, if it I meant it sarcastic I would have used the /s. Every decent human being would do that, and that's why its not an issue of gender.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 08:45 AM
8

The bigger problem here is that feminists created a stupid little 'movement' about the issue. That is exactly the point of this all, there would be no mocking picture of a girl "shebagging" here if manspreading would not exist in the first place. And I'll stand by saying most people would move if asked. Of course
/r/MensRights18/06/17 11:29 PM
1

I'd focus less on being anti-feminism and more on addressing specific, impactful miscarriages of justice like unfounded loss of custody or false rape accusations. You can focus on unequal custody laws AND mock unnecessarily, non-issue, sexist gendered transit "etiquette" pushed by feminist maniacs. I'd also acknowledge that it's possible for gender inequality to impact both genders without trying to shut the other side down, but what do I know. I don't know if you're being serious here, but ther…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 11:22 PM
12

They have fucking stickers against manspreading on the subways in Madrid and New York and you're saying "I'm pretty sure nobody complains about manspreading irl". This is bullshit. And now you're relativating it by saying the article is kind of shit? What do you have against men that you support such a sexist policy?
/r/MensRights18/06/17 10:11 PM
19

Madrid bans ‘manspreading’ on all public transit services First people arrested for 'manspreading' on New York subway
/r/MensRights18/06/17 09:45 PM
1

https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2017/06/12/madrid-introduces-campaign-to-combat-scourge-of-manspreading-on-city-buses.html http://nypost.com/2015/01/14/subway-manspreading-ads-shame-bro-riders/
/r/MensRights18/06/17 08:05 PM
1

Mens bone structure is build the way that it needs constant muscle tension to hold legs together. http://static1.squarespace.com/static/5601a1b2e4b0eaa138babe0c/5601a499e4b059089d7e33e3/56e030ef45bf21d060d0e609/1457533368670/1444775568437.gif?format=1000w Womens hips are wider and legs are more pointed inwards. That I even need to explain that to you is whats wrong with todays times. This whole issue is stupid to begin with.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 08:03 PM
1

Madrid bans ‘manspreading’ on all public transit services First people arrested for 'manspreading' on New York subway
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:59 PM
1

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/28/manspreading-arrest-broken-windows-policing_n_7462944.html
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:46 PM
19

Don't say anything! Document everything! Listen to your lawyer! If they come to any other conclusion as not guilty without evidence, sue them and profit!
/r/MensRights17/06/17 11:00 PM
7

However, blaming n entire gender or an institution for one’s poor relationship choices is hardly justified. To simplistic. It’s entirely socially acceptable for either sex to remain single and independent Wrong In doing more research, the parallels between MGTOW and modern day feminism became more and more apparent. [..] MGTOW demonizes women as greedy, manipulative and useless. Feminism vilifies men as sexist oppressors if not outright sexual predators. Both movements foster suspicion and distr…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 08:17 PM
25

Yes, that is such a misleading way of saying in 98% of cases the guilt of the accused cannot be proven.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:37 PM
6

I think he was mostly innocent How does mostly innocent of rape look like?
/r/MensRights17/06/17 04:54 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2yctit/completed_mens_rights_political_compass_poll_ty/
/r/MensRights17/06/17 04:33 PM
5

Source: https://heatst.com/world/trendy-moms-are-asking-their-babies-permission-to-pick-them-up-so-they-dont-turn-into-rapists/
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:09 PM
1

Watch the documentary The Red Pill if you haven't already Read about Warren Farrell and maybe his books like "The Myth of Male Power" If it's a debate, you have to know about the arguments the other site is going to bring up beforehand and learn to refute them Take a look at Ben Shapiros debate tactics on youtube, he has a guide up on how to debate feminists
/r/MensRights17/06/17 11:54 AM
1

And even if she were right, what does it matter? Why can't he choose to tell the stories he wants to tell? She fucked up the moment she thought there is something wrong with a man only telling stories about men.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 10:25 PM
3

Yes, very strange to see these two total different individuals collide. His rants about the globalists and humanity made me cringe so hard. I don't think she did herself a favor at all with that, but it probably will not make a difference in mainstream perception about her.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 10:09 PM
1

A movement based on 95% negativity has a problem. What total nonsense, literally every civil rights movement is based on a problem or lack of something. Thats the point. I just had a look at the Top posts. Literally all of them are pro mens rights, I honestly have no clue what you are talking about. Highlighting ways in which feminism is harming mens rights is pro men. And feminism does this a lot. When mra's try to raise awareness, things like this happens: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK7n_…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:54 PM
2

The texts she send to him and the story around it: https://www.bizarrepedia.com/charged-with-suicide/
/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:39 PM
1

But why can't we care about mens issues without shitty "REKT FEMINIST" shit like this? This sub does, it just happens that this low effort childish content reaches r/all in no time. But there is enough quality information in this sub to care about it. And as one user pointed out, its not anti women, its anti feminist and that with good reason. The mods around here are very lenient and only delete stuff thats strictly against the rules without censorship.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:23 PM
1

Sorry, but you have no idea what you are talking about. You are simply wrong. Activism happens, not as much as it should but it does and its often in the form of advocacy and raising awareness. And when it does, often feminism stands in its way. I would almost be certain that the two posts I provided are due to feminist lobbying and legislation, so there is a reason for being against feminism because feminism is literally against mens well being, not the other way around as you lied in your firs…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:17 PM
-4

Well feminists would say patriarchy is a social system in which males hold primary power and predominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege and control of property. Which is demonstrably true as shown by men being the majority in parliament and congress, right? It just happens as we all know that the reason for that isn't sexism. I am just trying to be cautioness that we don't exchange one boogeyman with another without evidence.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 06:59 PM
9

Every single day, there are dozens of posts which try to highlight important issues men face in this sub. Just from today: In ireland a man can not be raped by a woman by law or The new canadian foreign aid policy that 95% of foreign aid should go to help womens life If you consider highlighting these issues as "anti-women", "not pro men" or "nothing for men's rights at all" then simply fuck off. There are examples everyday with real issues, its just that these polarizing low effort tweets reach…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 06:40 PM
8

Wow, a woman is held accountable for her actions? My internalized white knight almost feels sympathy.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 05:52 PM
-14

Isn't gynocentrism the mra equivalent to patriarchy? Using that in a mocking sarcastic way might have a point, otherwise I would say gynocentrism is the same bullshit as patriarchy theory, or isn't it?
/r/MensRights16/06/17 05:48 PM
31

However, the fact that they garner so much support from normal people leaves me dumbfounded They don't! They are in the minority. Most people are just too afraid to speak up. First, if there is nobody else beside you and the person you're arguing listening, the argument is mostly pointless, because you can't change these people through debate, they can only change themselfs. Whats important to know is that you don't speak the same language as these people, they frame the argument and therefor yo…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:24 PM
29

Netflix in general is a diversity, millennial and social justice entertainment utopia. Orange is the new black already had the pregnancy story around the character Dayanara Diaz who framed the guard Mendez with rape and a false fatherhood
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:08 PM
3

Did he describe shit-tests at 4:33?
/r/MensRights16/06/17 12:21 PM
14

There are that kind of people, but not as many. We are able to call these hypocrits out around here which I try to do myself from time to time. Try to not be antagonizing and people will listen. Don't give up on it
/r/MensRights16/06/17 11:08 AM
1

Hi, what is your stance on Justin Trudeaus sexist policies regarding single male refugees, from which obviously gay men are impacted too. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/23/canada-syrian-refugee-resettlement-plan-no-single-men (I don't know if that is still policy or what is currently practiced though, I just heard about the article some time ago)
/r/MensRights15/06/17 11:19 AM
5

The biggest predictor of divorce is if the husband has a job at all, which includes "husband earns much less than wife"
/r/MensRights15/06/17 10:57 AM
6

They tried to lump us together with the trumplets from the beginning
/r/MensRights14/06/17 04:12 PM
1

Yes, it maybe should be considered in court, but calling her disgusting fat and ugly around here makes our argument look weak, unnecessarily so. Doesn't it? But to be honest I personally find her appearance disgusting too. Also there is this: http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/fitness/weight-loss/318kg-mumtobe-gives-up-on-dream-of-being-worlds-fattest-woman-for-the-sake-of-baby/news-story/ce94a4f03014c8b4fd333993898659a3
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:10 PM
5

The images speak for themself, no need to call her out on her looks
/r/MensRights14/06/17 01:59 PM
4

And that despite known feminist demagogues like Futrelle asked not to: http://archive.is/Z8nNp
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:30 PM
32

Easy solution Step 1: Try to sign up as a man Step 2: If you're rejected because of your sex, sue Step 3: Profit
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:57 PM
4

Maybe this is a ridiculous idea, bu you could set aside a fund, so when you have another discussion about this, when he is old enough, you can hand him the money for the restoration bundled with your apology.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 02:48 PM
9

So, listen and believe is ok now? Hasn't this principle brought us here in the first place?
/r/MensRights10/06/17 08:27 AM
2

Shuirts
/r/MensRights07/06/17 09:18 AM
32

It's sad that it's necessary to mention he's gay to give his argument legitimacy.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 11:57 AM
3

I agree with everything you said, except the part about choosing. Furthermore, those jobs are more dangerous particularly because those jobs are performed by men. The the same argument is made by feminists though. But instead of safety they argue the payment, its just the other side of the coin. We live in a free society, if you don't like your job quit, if you don't like the pay, work harder. If there is no job, move somewhere else. I don't see where "many men" cannot choose their work in the w…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 04:49 PM
13

Women earn less because among other things they chose less dangerous jobs and men die more often because they chose the more rewarding but dangerous work.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 03:45 PM
0

Pretty much all the upvoted responses are "maybe his wounds were self-inflicted", "there's no way he was defending himself", "what about her side of the story??" I've read comparable arguments on /r/MensRights when it was the other way around.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:42 AM
17

As always
/r/MensRights28/05/17 12:43 PM
3

I strongly disagree. This is a bad advice to give to a young person. It is ok to have friends with a different opinion as long as you treat each other with respect and can agree to disagree. Actually it is good to surround yourself from time to time with people with a different perspective to widen your own.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 11:05 AM
1210

The hardships of life men face have been totally detached from their perception. For them water comes out of the faucet, electricity out of the socket and food from the store. They have no idea that there is hard work and sometimes even suffering behind every single object they encounter in their everyday life. Mostly work only men are willing to do. They take it all for granted.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 08:51 AM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights26/05/17 01:16 PM
1

The kids of Lesbian and Gay parents come out fine. Is there anything to back this up with some studies?
/r/MensRights26/05/17 10:51 AM
3

That's how it starts. A bike lock on your head is where this rhetoric leads to.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:27 AM
13

Thats a tragical story. I hope he gets well soon. May I give one advice? Of course offer your brother all the help he needs and all, but whats more important is, that he feels a sense of purpose. So maybe ask him for help for stuff in the future yourself, he will feel needed again. Or maybe start doing volunteer work once a week yourself and get him to go with you or something. Hearing a Thank you once every now and then is great. I wish you both the best :)
/r/MensRights25/05/17 09:16 AM
2

Because thats how statistics work in general and everybody knows that?
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:49 PM
2

I totally agree
/r/MensRights24/05/17 10:16 AM
1

Yes, you're right. Thanks for the constructive discussion, you widened my perspective on this :)
/r/MensRights24/05/17 10:15 AM
2

So you would say it's wrong in general to ask an abuse victim what they were doing to cause the violence? Or do you think its wrong to ask men because we don't ask women the same? I know what you mean about their article though. It was probably with the typical condescending undertone of male oppressor guilt or something like that. 70% of domestic violence is reciprocal, so I would question that it's wrong in general to ask questions ab the cause, what do you think? I'm open to change this view …
/r/MensRights24/05/17 10:05 AM
1

What do you not like about them?
/r/MensRights24/05/17 09:29 AM
2

No we shouldn't. And these are only statistics, which means it doesn't provide any meaning for the individual because there are men who are more empathatic than some women and otherwise. I just feel its necessary to point out the double standards and inconsistencies we have around here in the mrm (with which I don't mean to imply that this is necesarily the case here). And we have many. I don't like when feminists do it, I don't like when feminists don't call each other out for it, so I try to l…
/r/MensRights24/05/17 09:27 AM
2

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19476221 The results confirm a greater empathic response in females than in males of the same age, differences growing with age. The sizes of the effect estimated in the second evaluation (average age 14 years) are large for emotional empathy and medium for cognitive empathy. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1963313/ As expected, ANOVA analyses revealed that women had higher levels of empathy than men but that forgiveness did not differ by gender. …
/r/MensRights24/05/17 08:31 AM
1

Whats wrong with you?
/r/MensRights23/05/17 09:11 PM
5

It's so common that people get banned over there, that /r/mensrights had to put it their policy not to mention it: No posts about bannings by other moderators (too common, not relevant to topic of "rights") Which you obviously ignored ;)
/r/MensRights23/05/17 09:08 PM
-4

It's not off ;) i didn't mean it to be sarcastic. My point is, men and women have naturaly different strengths and weaknesses. Caring for children for example is more intrinsic to women. Denying that is as absurd as denying that there are two genders. Women have developped to care for kids. Men not to that extent in the form of direct care. Humans are a dimorphic species.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 07:50 PM
52

"We rarely ask why men use more lethal methods. After all, a suicide attempt is a cry for help. And a cry for help shows a belief that someone will listen. But if you don’t believe anyone will listen then you don’t attempt suicide – you commit suicide." -Dave Dubay, The Goodmenproject Do women really attempt suicide more often?
/r/MensRights23/05/17 02:15 PM
-17

Women are more caring in the same way men are disposable. It's in our biology.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 02:13 PM
2

Does it matter who has it worse? Just hold everyone to the same standards individually and we should be fine. There are unique issues with though.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 11:35 AM
6

This: https://archive.is/QpH9k Reaction: https://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/domestic-violence-industry/october-is-the-fifth-annual-bash-a-violent-bitch-month/ HELP! MISOGYNY: http://archive.is/qDsUR
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:57 AM
1

dressed in the style of a prostitute No She actually comes up with very little that could reasonably be considered harassment True but she gives out plenty of signals No
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:51 PM
3

German sentences are not as long as in the US. The german justice system is more concerned about rehabilitation than about revenge.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:31 PM
1

I agree with all you said. But I don't see how that makes you not agree with the point. The severity of the issue is not important to the point of wether or not its true. Saying its not as bad actually aknowledges that it exists, doesn't it? If you compare a naked man and a naked woman, the naked woman has an intrinsic value because of her genitals. The man has an extrinsic value, namely the potential to do work.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:24 PM
1

Why not? Would you like to elaborate that a bit? I agree that the fear is blown out of proportion and mostly irrational, but I don't see how that refutes the point, because there is still some legitimacy left. You know, women are getting raped, its just less often feminists than tell us. Aknowledging that doesn't scratch the legitimacy of mens rights one bit.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:39 PM
7

Maybe because most of womens serious issues stem from having children, and thats usually the age where women get or raise them?
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:13 PM
2

Thats why i wrote "no matter how likely it is or how justified" That should not be the point of my argument
/r/MensRights22/05/17 11:58 AM
2

Ill, must be a fat basement dwelling ugly neckbeard am I right?
/r/MensRights22/05/17 11:15 AM
1

Do you have any source for that?
/r/MensRights22/05/17 09:35 AM
16

"Be less confident" Feminism 2017
/r/MensRights21/05/17 01:07 PM
1

Women have testosterone too, and there are some women who have more than some men: http://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/8026/fnbeh-05-00009-HTML/image_m/fnbeh-05-00009-g001.jpg Shown is a depiction of the bimodal distribution of raw, baseline salivary testosterone values (in pg/mL) when including both men (N = 360) and women (N = 407) Men tend to have baseline testosterone levels three to seven times greater than women on average http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnbeh.2011.000…
/r/MensRights21/05/17 01:04 PM
2

There are feminists who truly love men and take their issues seriously, but they get totally overshadowed by the radicals who are at least as numerous. The moderate feminists don't matter, they're used as shield by the crazy ones. And these moderates are not able to see how the radicals are harmful to men, they are wilfully naive. That makes the whole movement toxic, but that doesn't mean that all feminists are scumbag bigots.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 09:36 AM
44

4 of these 6 points are rooted in the state. The state is one big redistributing mechanism from men to women.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 09:10 AM
1

If a guy wants to bust himself 12 hours a day to provide for his wife or girlfriend who's to say he's being oppressed? Whats makes this an unfair situation is, the liberation of women. Either we liberate both sexes or none. Because right now, the wife of this 12 hours guy can just divorce him, take his kids and half he owns.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:57 PM
5

What is the mens rights angle here?
/r/MensRights18/05/17 09:42 PM
11

Career feminists even go out of their way to wilfully lie about the movie. So if you want to have a laugh out of frustration, watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFi4vQF8-xQ
/r/MensRights18/05/17 08:27 AM
6

The police can arrest and hold you without charging. Under which circumstances is this necessary?
/r/MensRights17/05/17 09:57 PM
-2

I have to point this out again. This is not progress. This is a step further into the regressive concept of censorship which will probably collapse in on itself the near future. If you would consider this progress because this incident supports the destruction of feminist censorship too further down the road, okay, but I cannot support the idea of describing censorship as progress. But maybe its the necessary evil we need at this point
/r/MensRights16/05/17 03:25 PM
4

Yes. I, and I think the most of people in this sub, actually started of with listening and humanizing feminism. Because we are a generation brought up by mothers with values of stemming from feminism. But what we observed growing up was something else, that feminist ideas are not the complete picture. We discovered there is another side of the coin, our own.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 03:19 PM
9

She should be a role model for all of us. Her story and message is especially important for the growing mrm
/r/MensRights15/05/17 10:29 PM
4

Do you have a source for that?
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:38 PM
0

By rewriting history I mean that feminists insist that historically women have been treated like human garbage "Only by rewriting history have women feminists been able to claim victimhood."
/r/MensRights15/05/17 08:38 AM
-2

Men have put women on a pedestal for millenia. We fight over them, chase them, woo them, win them, cherish them. Women get diamonds and flowers and candies. Women and children first. Women can stay home and not work. Women get more assistance from family, more government aid All true, and I agree with that, but... less stressful jobs, less hazardous jobs, study easier subjects in college... I have to object. Women don't "get" those. They apply for these jobs. You could too if you want to earn le…
/r/MensRights14/05/17 10:05 PM

Feminists and other women would do well to listen to her. They won't. Many feminists will get a kick out of hearing that men feel emasculated nowadays. They actually going to laugh out of schadenfreude
/r/MensRights13/05/17 04:53 PM
1

Copypasta: I don't dislike circumcision in general, I just despise infant circumcision. There is Female Genital Mutilation Type I a, classified by the WHO, which is the removal of the clitoral hood. The clitoral hood develops into the foreskin in male fetus. So FGM Type I a for a girl is what circumcision is for a boy. It is the same bodypart on different genders. The medical term for female mutilation type 1 a is literally "circumcision" too, where as the more severe forms of female genital mut…
/r/MensRights13/05/17 04:10 PM
1

Progress would be if they got rid of the whole hate speech shit overall.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 10:02 PM
3

Agree. If you're interested have a listen to the lectures of Jordan B. Peterson on youtube. He is an excellent professor and has actually done research on the topics on political beliefs and its correlation with behaviour
/r/MensRights12/05/17 05:20 PM
6

You have no idea what you're talking about. I wouldn't berate you about things regarding lawschool, so don't tell me what gender roles are doing. This https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5LRdW8xw70 documentary gives an interesting inside on the topic. Basicly it says, the more egalitarian and free a society is, the more men and women follow through their biological programming.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 05:10 PM
3

If it's just a conspiracy, why are you afraid of watching it?
/r/MensRights12/05/17 05:03 PM
4

Oh honey. I was once like you, I would have made the same statements. Maybe have a look at the movie I provided, maybe you will be able to listen with an open mind. Maybe
/r/MensRights12/05/17 05:02 PM
3

Do the world a favor and have a look at this documentary http://theredpillmovie.com/ Or maybe listen to Karen Straughan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA
/r/MensRights12/05/17 04:59 PM
6

Once this settles down, I'm sure we'll have equal grades. Yeah, sure... There's barely a difference between male and female brains. This is a cultural thing. Yeah right.... and the culture today is "care for yourself if you're a man, society doesn't give a shit about you"
/r/MensRights12/05/17 04:55 PM
5

There is someone insulting and shaming people associating men's rights and you have the audacity to bann people who call this piece of shit out? I'm ashamed of your sexist attitude. No wonder the courts are stacked against men with white knights like you.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 04:52 PM
0

There is so much literal misogyny and sexism that its no good. If they would just promote the positive things a life without women has to offer I would celebrate and defend them. But their community seems to rely on bashing women constantly. It seems its all the mgtow community ever does. I don't know what they do in real life though, almost nobody of them would probably go out of their way to insult women or harm anyone. I'm open to change my mind about that though.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 11:26 PM
6

Please don't give them clicks. If you have to visit use adblock and archive.is to link their page. Lets not give those fascists an inch
/r/MensRights10/05/17 11:08 PM
1

Ironic, since "The red pill" uses an insensitive title too.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:26 AM
27

Can you go directly to the administration and try to make an anonymous complaint because you fear about your grades?
/r/MensRights06/05/17 07:02 PM
10

I completly forgot the feminists trying to dismantle women's prisons I would argue we can't let questions like I asked unanswered under pictures, posts or issues like that, because otherwise the general public will regard those things like if its just a crazy conspiracy or complete exaggeration
/r/MensRights06/05/17 12:10 PM
17

Security through her out and they gave me a gift card.. Faith in humanity rekindled
/r/MensRights06/05/17 12:05 PM
0

Where in this video does it say there was 0 physical evidence?
/r/MensRights06/05/17 10:49 AM
-18

Playing devils advocat here, can you point out to me how this case happened because of feminism? I would only argue that feminism has done nothing to prevent cases like this. I also heared, that in general female judges judge women more harshly than male judges. Have nothing to back it up though.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 10:15 AM
38

They feel they can get away with it. FTFY
/r/MensRights05/05/17 02:07 PM
1

Where did you find this /u/Imnotmrabut ?
/r/MensRights05/05/17 11:13 AM
33

http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/01/european-queens-waged-more-wars-than-kings.html
/r/MensRights02/05/17 01:01 PM
1

As long as they're thinner than a thumb, I see no problem with that.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 02:54 PM
1

Its illegal to discriminate based on someones sex.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 07:30 AM
28

Do you need a lawyer to file a complaint?
/r/MensRights29/04/17 10:44 PM
2

You Have to hit first 3:28 You need to frame your oponent 4:24 You have to frame the debate 8:08 You need to spot inconsistencies in the leftists argument 9:13 You have to force the leftist to answer questions 11:45 Do not get distracted 12:55 If you don't know something, you need to admit it right of the bat 14:50 You don't have to get sucked in by paradigm 16:48 Its actually kind of fun to let the other side have meaningless victories 18:09 Body language actually matters, whoever gets angry fi…
/r/MensRights29/04/17 08:04 PM
200

Do they receive government funds? Can you file a title ix complaint? https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/tix_dis.html
/r/MensRights29/04/17 07:31 PM
7

Legendary!
/r/MensRights29/04/17 06:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter