TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mod-ulate Archive

View 4 posts and 202 comments by Mod-ulate on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Removed for being inaccurate.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 04:00 PM
–

I am sorry to hear about what you are going through. I encourage you to see a psychologist/counsellor. Unfortunately, your post doesn't meet the topical requirements for this subreddit, so I have removed it. If you have a question to pose to other men, try /r/AskMen. If you just want to share, try /r/OffMyChest or other similar subreddits.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 01:41 PM
1

End this discussion or I will end it for you. Nothing good is coming from your debate. Let it go.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 02:48 PM
1

End this discussion or I will end it for you. This is hitting the level that we would call harassment, which is against our rules. Move on to other discussions.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 02:47 PM
1

*Not actual statistics.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 06:45 PM
–

No, this subreddit has never been banned before. We have been threatened with banning by Admins, which has resulted in more strict enforcement of our rules. This sometimes bothers members, as it goes against our stated mission of open speech, but we feel that a surviving subreddit is more important.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 06:44 PM
2

Where trans issues intersect with men's issues, the topic is relevant to the subreddit. As proposed, this is a trans-specific issue and not relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 05:33 AM
1

The counterargument to use here is that this presumes a person has a finite amount of empathy. What does it say about the person if they have a finite amount of empathy? They have no room left to be empathetic towards male suffering simply because they believe that more women have empathy-worthy experiences?
/r/MensRights26/06/26 08:57 PM
4

I realize that people have been fed the line of bullshit that circumcision reduces HIV risk, but it really doesn't. Biased science and biased scientists do bad science all the time. Here is an example of a study undermining the argument that circumcision reduces HIV risk. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-biosocial-science/article/abs/ageincidence-and-prevalence-of-hiv-among-intact-and-circumcised-men-an-analysis-of-phia-surveys-in-southern-africa/CAA7E7BD5A9844F41C6B7CC3573B9E5…
/r/MensRights24/06/26 01:26 PM
–

This is not relevant to this subreddit. Further updates will be removed.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 02:21 PM
1

The majority of men I have met have been supportive of people who have been assaulted. The majority of women have been turned off or hostile to male victims. Men who are victims are seen as less capable of providing and protected by women, in my experience. The experienced reality for men is that "man up" is communicated between men to let them know that women won't tolerate weakness. They are trying to help other men not be ostracized by women.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 05:24 PM
2

Yes, that has been part of the discussion.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 03:40 PM
–

Since people are reporting this for a variety of reasons, I want to chime in on what I see as the relevant "men's rights" angle of discussion. This could be a case of what I would call "perpetratorless harm". Some other examples would be someone taking drugs. They might have chosen to take drugs, and only later once they are addicted did they realize that it is harming their life and they need support to get clean. In this case, the woman might have realized that she didn't like the experience a…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 06:01 PM
-58

A person might be pressured into something, out of concern for the consequences if they do not do the thing.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 05:56 PM
12

There is the implied "do you think the same would happen if the genders were switched?" There is also the issue where if the woman is deemed to have not given consent, then it is implied that she was raped. Yet none of the men involved seemed to have any indication that she didn't consent. Our society might view them as rapists despite that not being their intention nor their action in the moment. Ultimately, there is an issue that stands unresolved in our society that it is possible for one per…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 05:53 PM
–

By sharing this on ResearchGate, it suggests it is a valid research paper. It has not been peer reviewed. This is a manipulation of the research process and potentially the viewers.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 11:38 AM
5

See: https://www.npr.org/2026/04/10/nx-s1-5773327/women-men-jobs-health-care-manufacturing
/r/MensRights04/06/26 03:15 PM
–

People reporting this as false should read other reports on this issue: https://www.npr.org/2026/04/10/nx-s1-5773327/women-men-jobs-health-care-manufacturing
/r/MensRights04/06/26 03:15 PM
–

There is no evidence in the post that feminists had anything to do with it. Removed.
/r/MensRights10/05/26 05:08 PM
–

AI slop is not welcome here.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 06:22 PM
–

If you are going to make a claim like this, you need to provide evidence.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 03:02 PM
1

It seems like a lot of people here are missing the point - the comments are the gender flipped version of comments that get said all the time.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 02:03 PM
–

Women != Feminists. Nothing in this post indicates that these are feminist, nor that they represent most/all women.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 11:45 AM
1

The text submitted with reports is not shown to us by default. If you send a link to modmail along with an explanation, that will definitely get read. A general rule of thumb: Reddit sucks for moderators.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 05:42 PM
1

I am trying to defend your argument, but some of these posts are actually getting into defending forcing women to have children. Maybe you should clarify - do you actually think women should be forced to have children?
/r/MensRights20/03/26 02:20 PM
3

That argument has been made on this subreddit multiple times. It isn't an effective argument because people say that women aren't as good in combat roles. So the OP is trying a different perspective. OP is not wanting women to be raped. If you can't understand that, you are clearly triggered and unwilling to understand the perspective that the OP is sharing.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 02:19 PM
1

The issue is that many people don't seem to understand the problem with conscription, so when you force people to confront parallels with an argument they can understand perhaps they will see the problems with their original perspective. Since you are triggered by this, it is working.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 02:17 PM
1

If you don't know what it is like being a mod, don't comment on it. Each post is viewed separately. We don't have easy ways to remember between posts. This comment was reported, so I investigated further and now the account is banned.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 01:52 PM
–

This post is being brigaded from outside of this subreddit. It is my understanding that the OP is not promoting that women be forced to have children, but rather showing how unfair it is that men are forced to fight in wars. If you are triggered by this, but aren't doing anything to oppose selective service, take a long hard look at yourself.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 01:40 PM
3

If you are going to discount an argument because it is 50 years old, then don't make an argument that is >100 years old. Women not being able to vote more than 100 years ago is even more irrelevant if men being drafted 50 years ago is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 05:17 PM
–

There is nothing political about this post. The addition of "Far-left" to the title appears to be an attempt to politicize a non-political issue.
/r/MensRights13/02/26 01:18 AM
–

Locking this thread since it doesn't seem that people can stay on topic.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 03:10 AM
–

There is nothing wrong with posting a link to the article rather than a screenshot. Posting a screenshot of a title could easily be a faked title.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 06:27 PM
1

Use Google. This isn't the right subreddit - we are more world-wide than local.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 04:42 AM
–

Feel free to repost this with evidence supporting the claim.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 06:17 PM
0

You have provided an argument that there is a war on two men, that does not mean there is a war on men in general. Andrew Tate and Nick Fuentes are not people to admire or hold as a reasonable standard.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 03:43 PM
4

Having boundaries in relationships can be viewed as a form of rejection. Because men are socialized to be the initiators, men are the ones who deal with rejection more and end up learning to manage the emotions coming from rejection. Women, on average (not universally), deal with rejection worse.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 11:07 PM
–

I made this a sticky - very good analysis!
/r/MensRights06/01/26 06:26 PM
1

Perhaps horrible people like Trump wouldn't be in power if this kind of attitude wasn't prevalent. It is comments like the ones OP pointed out that radicalize people against "wokeness". Guess which comments are older? (Hint: Its the feminist comments) Nothing justifies any of the horrible things people are saying, on either side. But you know, glass houses and stones, right?
/r/MensRights29/11/25 01:10 PM
0

It is mostly right-wing people, who tend to post anti-women content, that are bots.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 05:53 AM
–

This is not a red pill subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 06:35 PM
16

When women commit crimes, society let's them get away with it. So if you collect biased data, it should not be surprising when the statistics end up biased.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 04:18 PM
–

Paranoia and delusions of this level are concerning. Enough people here have responded to you suggesting that you should seek psychological help. That is likely a good place to start.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 04:35 AM
2

And reinforce that men can't cry or express emotions quite a bit in my experience. It is a classic abuse tactic to create the situation and then show empathy for the situation.
/r/MensRights09/11/25 01:56 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights26/10/25 12:25 PM
2

AI makes the world worse.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 01:47 PM
6

I was less sexist than the average man or woman in both categories. 1.64 and 1.36. The questions were quite biased. Many of the questions had an element of "unfair towards women" but I would have similarly answered it as unfair towards men. Seems like the questionnaire is inherently sexist.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 01:05 PM
2

The problem with Liberals is their attempt to be centrist. They bow to right wing (corporate/wealthy) pressures to keep taxes low. They act as conservatives even if they claim to be different. It compensates for the loss of votes to the NDP.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 07:03 PM
1

Stupid people would rather pay more money for private insurance than less money in taxes for a proper health care system. It is too bad that the Conservatives have screwed over Canadian health care.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 02:37 PM
26

I have similarly experienced doctors not believing me. I later talked to a woman about my frustrations with that and they became upset at me, believing that it was nothing as bad as what they experience. Medical professionals seem to discount everyone, regardless of gender. I think it is just that men complain less in general, and so society has perceived it to be a gendered problem that women experience.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 02:34 PM
-2

Your point? Not sure how that relates to what I said.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 04:07 AM
10

It all depends on how to do the demographics. Men are over-represented in science and engineering, and underrepresented in humanities, social science, education, and fine arts. This type of thing wouldn't be so bad if there were equivalent efforts to get better representation of men in fields like psychology and education.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 06:54 PM
3

Ironically written by AI.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 05:23 PM
7

If you accuse us of not giving a shit one more time, you can take a break from the subreddit. We have lives. We have jobs. We aren't on here 24/7. That post has been removed. It was removed as soon as a mod had the time to log on and go through the queue.
/r/MensRights10/10/25 05:19 PM
–

I am making this an announcement because this is a really big deal and should be recognized. RIP Erin Pizzey.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 04:22 PM
-2

Sure. Exactly what a marketing person would say. ;)
/r/MensRights07/10/25 04:19 PM
16

I can simultaneously support AOC's politics, reject Miller's politics, and also think that AOC's body shaming is inappropriate.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 04:18 PM
18

This post reeks of "viral marketing". If this post is by someone involved in the documentary, why not just post about it actively? It would be welcomed here.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 03:08 PM
–

This is not a relevant discussion for this subreddit. Issues experienced by trans individuals because of the male-aspect of their identity/past is a relevant discussion for Men's Rights. But trans issues because of trans-ness is not. Asking people about their perspective of trans people is not an issue related specifically to the male aspect of trans-ness.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 12:18 AM
1

It says something about the people who are drawn to the discussion. People generally click on the topics in which they are interested in contributing. You posted something controversial, so people who disagree with you are going to be more likely to click on it.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:58 PM
1

Random people post random things. The thing a person says is not "the sub" saying it.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:48 PM
2

There is no link at the end that I can see... Can you provide a link to the actual study? That's more important than someone's comments on it.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 03:15 PM
2

Well, the OP has been removed. All the mods have day jobs so it can take some time to remove things that don't belong here.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 06:52 PM
1

Vocal minority. Past surveys have shown a small left-wing bias in the subreddit, though it is pretty close to even. The right-wingers just talk about politics directly more often.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 01:55 PM
–

Reddit doesn't ban subs based on the topic, it bans subs based on the behaviours of moderators. If content that breaks reddit rules goes unmoderated, the subreddit will be banned. Don't want subs to be banned? Follow the rules. Don't like that? You don't need to be here. Reddit is a privately owned company, there is no obligation to freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 04:31 PM
1

Wealthy women and men.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 04:24 PM
1

He was not found innocent. There are still ongoing legal cases against him.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 09:11 PM
1

Because it happens so often that if we allowed those posts, they would flood the subreddit. Maybe read the rules before you post?
/r/MensRights18/08/25 02:02 PM
–

Cat calling is not "complimenting". OP's title is misleading.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 07:02 PM
–

There is a reason why I remove all foreign dating promotions on this subreddit. I didn't think that this was revolutionary. It seems more obvious to me.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 04:11 PM
1

Thanks for letting me know?
/r/MensRights27/07/25 11:58 AM
2

Because we ban people like that?
/r/MensRights25/07/25 05:16 PM
2

I am reading the whole thread. You are being too sensitive about the situation. People were not acting inappropriately. For example, saying that a transwoman used to be a man is not transphobic. At some point, that person identified as a man. Then they transitioned. I have removed the very few comments where people have actually denigrated trans people.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 02:52 PM
-1

I think you mean prostrate not prostate. Look up the difference if it wasn't just a simple typo and you will see what I mean.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 02:48 PM
1

The implication is that women are made responsible for household shopping, and so they are spending household money. Nothing in this discusses whether that spending is appropriate or not.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 02:12 PM
8

People take this personally because many men find there way to this subreddit because of their personal victimization at the hands of women. What you are saying comes across as "It doesn't happen a lot, so it isn't a big deal." You are treading some very thin lines here. I strongly suggest you cease this conversation before you find your welcome here rescinded.
/r/MensRights07/07/25 07:15 AM
6

x+y=z a+b=c They may use different letters, but they have the same form. If one is wrong, so is the other.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 01:40 AM
17

Men cheat BAD. Women cheat GOOD! WTF is this shit?
/r/MensRights02/07/25 03:43 PM
4

Citations needed.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 08:35 AM
–

ChatGPT and other AIs are not authoritative. "AI Slop" should not be used in serious discussions.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 07:41 PM
–

Normally we don't allow cross posting. However, this is an archived post, so commenting is not available. So I am making a one-time exception.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 04:30 PM
5

Are you a woman on this subreddit? Or did you just ignore the title of the post?
/r/MensRights01/06/25 03:05 PM
–

Divorce is not psychological violence.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 02:43 PM
-3

People keep reporting your comments likely because they don't follow the common perspective on this subreddit. However, I keep approving them because they are respectful enough, on topic, and genuinely expressing your opinion rather than just trying to rile people up. This is more of a message that this subreddit does allow people with different perspectives to discuss, even if some members don't like what is said. (In this case, though, I think you have a great point. Messaging is important and…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 03:04 PM
1

You have no idea how much of his stuff doesn't get through.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 03:15 PM
18

Apparently "misogynistic" means "posts that aren't flattering to women". Women CAN do wrong, you know. Men aren't the only gender that does harm. Ultimately, people who have been hurt by the opposite gender, over and over, tend to have negative views. They need a place to vent. When it crosses the line, we remove the posts.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 02:54 AM
–

This is not an issue of rights.
/r/MensRights30/04/25 08:12 PM
–

This is better for /r/askmen
/r/MensRights25/04/25 01:46 PM
–

The title is contradicted in the body.
/r/MensRights19/04/25 08:46 PM
–

It is not illegal to say "it's not all men".
/r/MensRights18/04/25 03:01 AM
–

You make a claim that is easily verifiable, yet don't provide any verification. Removed until you are willing to back up your claim.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 06:14 PM
–

We don't allow posts about moderator actions.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 06:57 AM
–

As horrible as this is, it does not seem to be a specific issue of men's rights. It is an issue of people's rights.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 12:48 AM
–

Feel free to provide any evidence for any of your claims in your post, and then they will be let through.
/r/MensRights14/04/25 12:59 AM
3

How many countries have some form of legal control over men's bodies? There are marriage laws that affect men, also, there are mandatory military service laws. I counted 66 with mandatory military service on this website: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-with-mandatory-military-service I agree that countries shouldn't institute laws of these forms, but reinforcing gender roles through laws is not a woman-only issue and it is disrespectful to men to only focus on the o…
/r/MensRights09/04/25 02:10 PM
1

The Masturbation bill was satire.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 03:59 AM
–

"We are all aware that" - Citation needed. Don't be like feminists. Be better. Back up your claims.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 02:39 PM
1

We will talk and see what we can come up with. But we have other restrictions than are what are obvious.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 11:10 PM
1

So: Reported as: SPAM (advertisements, subreddit bans, reposts, fakes) isn't good enough? Unfortunately, reddit limits the number of rules we can have, and we have hit that limit. So we can't add a new one. I changed the "Low value, low effort" one to now say "Fake/falsified, low value, or low effort" which might make it more clear?
/r/MensRights10/03/25 09:03 PM
1

Have you tried reporting them? There is too much content to read and moderate everything. We rely on assistance from subscribers, as does all of reddit.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 05:44 PM
5

An example is people posting links to websites that are backed by RT or other Russian sources.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 04:41 AM
-3

At no time was this subreddit singled out.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 11:15 PM
-18

The clear examples get removed. So no. But I will say that I removed some disinformation on this thread already.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 11:14 PM
–

The linked post is locked, so I am making an exception to the cross linking ban to post this.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 08:37 PM
1

This post is deleted because you can't find anything. If you can find something, you can post it. But as it stands, it looks like you are making something up.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:30 AM
-2

Yes, most conversations end up like this because people have opinions that they refuse to back up with evidence. You did it. They did it. Everyone does it. You are not coming off as some kind of bastion of superiority here. You come across as just as broken as they.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 11:25 PM
–

Yes, there are. As mods, we have seen them.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 06:56 PM
0

Do you have counter evidence?
/r/MensRights18/12/24 06:43 PM
1

Subreddit surveys suggested a moderate left-leaning bias on this subreddit. Conservatives are loudest, but not dominant.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 02:18 AM
6

Check out The Tin Men Blog on Instagram. Just about all of the talking points you will need.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 05:26 PM
–

The uptick in stupidity post-election is quite obvious. We have been removing as much as we can, but we can't stop it from being posted. You could be mature about it and report it to help us out. Or you could be childish and quit.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 08:46 AM
1

I am not American. I am not sure if any of the mods are American. (Maybe 1 or 2 highly inactive ones.) And you should be embarrassed to have a convicted felon win an election.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 04:53 PM
1

This is not an American subreddit. America is not the centre of the world. The election was a shit show.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 10:05 AM
1

Yes, I read the post quickly and misinterpreted. My bad. But I still feel my post added to the conversation.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 02:54 PM
8

Previous surveys of this subreddit show a slight left leaning. Maybe you should learn the difference between loud right & quiet left, and actual political leaning.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 04:26 PM
–

This has devolved into a political thread and this is not a sub about US politics.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 01:00 PM
5

Some people are reporting this because of the dead body tissue comment. Of note, this does seem to be at least partially true. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/07/17/why-planned-parenthood-wont-stop-donating-fetal-organs/
/r/MensRights12/09/24 05:33 AM
–

Fortunately, men already have the right to not date single mothers. Thus, it isn't a relevant thing to discuss here.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 02:30 PM
–

Someone reported this, probably because the language suggests it was written by a MAGAdiot. But this doesn't break the rules, so it gets to stay up. The issue still stands - they say in the subheading that it is 4x higher and then they cite a study that shows it is 2x higher.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 11:15 PM
9

There are multiple injustices happening here. A person who was violent towards others does not receive consequences. A system has been exposed as being blatantly anti-male.
/r/MensRights24/08/24 02:47 PM
0

Goes to show that it isn't "patriarchy" that reinforces unhealthy male behaviours but "conservatism". No need to malign men. It is both men and women who push these ideas, and they align with political conservatism more than any gender ideology.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 08:35 PM
17

There are two possibilities: The accusations are unfounded. The system disregards the safety and autonomy of women and sides with men except in egregious cases. Both are bad. Feminists perceive that the second is the problem. Others believe that the first is. Evidence is needed to support to what extend each exists in our society. Simply dismissing charges is not evidence because it is explainable by both hypotheses. A system that doesn't protect against both, however, is an unjust society.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 01:07 PM
2

Use the report feature when you see things like that. Oddly, someone reported you (likely the person you responded to), so that helped me find this comment and ban them.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 03:04 PM
1

You believe it to be a troll. What evidence do you have? The filter did initially remove it, but I didn't have any evidence that it was fake so I let it through. Is it so hard for users to point these things out and self police?
/r/MensRights12/08/24 03:42 PM
1

I think mandatory paternity testing is a great idea. If it is mandatory for legal purposes then it isn't an attack on the mother. Heck, it would probably protect against those rare-but-occasional instances of babies being switched, also.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 01:19 PM
–

A reminder about statistics: This is a biased sample, as these are cases where there was reason to suspect the men weren't the father. It does not indicate anything about the general population. If people use this to talk about all women, or even women in general, it will be locked and/or removed.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 02:36 PM
–

As per usual, American idiots go crazy around the election time.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 05:58 AM
30

No-fault divorce wasn't necessarily the problem. With at-fault divorce, it just incentivizes people to make false accusations. It is going to increase vitriol in divorce proceedings. Addressing alimony and child custody practices would be a better approach to addressing divorce inequities than removing no-fault divorces.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 01:59 PM
1

This is ridiculously disrespectful to people whose ancestors were actually slaves.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 02:54 PM
2

I suspect you are either fabricating this answer, or else it is the only time you ever paid attention to it. Or you are a bot pushing an agenda.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 02:53 PM
7

Certainly the conditions for the right to vote were initially based on gender - men who owned land had the right to vote. Then it was expanded to military individuals and all land owners. This wasn't based on gender, but the social trends lead to it being predominantly men. Was society gender biased in the past? Yes. Was it because of hatred of women? I don't think the data supports that. Society was changing, and technology was fueling that change. Too many people forget the social motivations …
/r/MensRights13/06/24 10:32 PM
1

The traffic to this thread is not natural. There is outside influence here.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 04:57 AM
1

Admins took further steps to make our sub less "popular" in their algorithms, I think. I have no proof, but the data shows a change that can't be explained by changing demographics.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 01:31 PM
1

I don't think you see how ironic it is that you are calling people Antifa Nazis. Nazis are fascist and Antifa is by definition anti-fascist. Nazis are racist and Antifa is anti-racist in practice.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 08:05 PM
7

Person changes a few words in your post to illustrate the problematic ethics. You report their comment and accuse them of obfuscation without addressing their point... And you think THEY are in the wrong? I don't think you are welcome here if you are going to justify sexism on this level.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 03:07 PM
–

For those reporting this as anti-trans, I don't agree. Anti-trans comments are not welcome on this subreddit, but the main post by OP is not anti-trans.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 04:09 PM
8

My guess is someone used that study to argue a point that the OP wasn't ready to accept at face value, and they wanted some supporting insight to help them justify their perspective.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 02:33 PM
2

Made up statistics to demonize men.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:09 AM
2

Keep telling yourself that. I am sure it helps you sleep at night. Your side of the camp is also comfortable with saying "Kill all men" and a host of other horrific things. There is always some kind of justification, just as you are doing now. But the cold reality is that you are engaging in HATE. Men get blamed for hating women, with claims that misandry isn't real, but you see far, far fewer men talking about killing women than women talking about killing men. I don't approve of Nazi-emulators…
/r/MensRights10/05/24 05:01 PM
2

Did you know you are using an argument first published by Nazi's? https://theintercept.com/2016/09/20/nazi-who-originated-donald-trump-jr-s-skittles-metaphor-was-hanged-at-nuremberg/ Congratulations.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 03:01 PM
10

There have been dozens of posts on this issue already. We have been removing new posts that aren't really adding anything to the discussion. This post does add something to the discussion.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 07:43 PM
–

Just like men are not a monolithic group, neither are women. Stop being part of the problem.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 02:17 AM
6

Men's Rights groups don't claim to be a group that focuses on women's issues. Feminists claim to be solving problems for BOTH genders. There is a difference and you know it, and are just being disingenuous.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 02:34 PM
23

That's not a thing... Men's rights is asking for equal treatment and supports for domestic abuse.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 02:34 PM
–

Removed for including false information. Nothing I can see says that the foreskin releases pheromones. I am anti-circumcision, but I am also anti-false arguments.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:29 PM
9

For those whose livelihoods would be affected by publicly advocating for men and boys, it is understandable why they stay anonymous. Those who are able to do it publicly need to be recognized and applauded by for their efforts. I have a great deal of respect for those who can put up with the bullshit they receive.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:54 PM
7

Apparently the Reddit spam filter thought that your links or something you said was worthy of removal. I have approved this comment.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 01:58 PM
14

If you can't use reasonable language to describe people and instead rely on "soyboys" and "simps" and "bitch", then you are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 10:07 PM
59

Any community that focuses on emotional topics is primed to be manipulated and taken advantage of. That is the danger here. The mods try not to play favourites, and any attempts to call you a groomer without evidence would be removed immediately. However, other things posted by Roma Army might remain. I have messaged you before - I think you have one of the calmest, sanest and most intelligent voices in the Men's Rights communities right now. So it saddens me that you are dealing with this bulls…
/r/MensRights03/04/24 10:04 PM
0

What the fuck are you on about? What does this have to do with you not using appropriate gender terms?
/r/MensRights27/02/24 05:47 PM
-1

You undermine your ability to make an argument when you call one gender "girls" and the other "men". You suggest a predisposition against one gender by using a diminutive term.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:32 PM
0

This is not a MGTOW subreddit. You should take discussions of MGTOW issues to appropriate subreddits.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 04:41 AM
1

I have had similar experiences. It is anecdotal, but seemingly common anecdotal experience from men.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 06:51 PM
–

Memes are not a welcome submission format for this subreddit.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 12:05 AM
–

Approaching is not cat calling or sexualizing. If that is what you are doing, you aren't approaching women right. But dating strategies is not a part of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 02:11 PM
–

It is well understood that this happens. Its a great thing to talk about. Trash reality TV does not add to the discussion, nor can it be trusted to be actually real.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 10:43 PM
–

Removed because this is an attack on women rather than a focus on circumcision. Fathers can be equally involved in circumcision decisions.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 02:28 PM
–

Removed. This is a claim with no evidence. Ragebaiting.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:36 AM
–

The issue of "simping" is one for Red Pill or other similar groups, it is not an issue of rights.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 08:09 PM
2

This is an edge case that we sometimes leave in. The issue is the harassment that men receive, which society turns a blind eye to. Harassment of this level would be discussed elsewhere if it were aimed at women.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 02:49 PM
2

Keep in mind that this doesn't mean he didn't do it, just that there isn't enough information to convict. There are two possibilities here: He was violent and he now got away with it. He was not violent and he went through a horrible ordeal defending himself. The justice system worked as it is supposed to in this case. The problem isn't the justice system per se, but rather the court of public opinion that resulted in consequences for a person who was not convicted of any crime.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 05:24 PM
–

"Simping" is a topic for Red Pill groups. That is not an issue of rights.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 09:16 PM
–

Several of the images include account information for the person and can lead to harassment. I have removed this. If you remove the photos with the information, the post can be reinstated.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 09:13 PM
0

Elon is not exactly an icon to look up to these days.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 02:50 PM
3

Yup. Responding made it visible. All fixed.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 03:08 PM
10

This comment is not visible to anyone, despite being approved. I am responding to it to see if that changes anything.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 11:07 PM
–

The article does not state that the woman lied about her sexual assault, only that she was sued for defamation.
/r/MensRights02/12/23 05:58 PM
0

Look at voting records. The left don't specifically support the wealthy, but they are subject to misinformation by lobbyists. Only the right is specifically harming the population for the benefit of the wealthy.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 07:12 PM
-2

The left cares about people, the right cares about the wealthy and religious. The alignment with religion is antithetical to governance. In the end, all politicians are self serving right now and are virtue signalling to their base.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 06:01 PM
-2

I am not sure it is gaslighting. But I agree with you that it is pointless. You can't fix crazy.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 02:39 PM
-4

I think you are engaging with someone who is employing something like the Motte and Bailey Fallacy. They retreat to a position they think is defensible when you make a point, rather than expressing what is obviously their real perspective.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 02:12 PM
1

Your solution is both stupid and unachievable. Would you support the same system if it were men with primary custody, receiving child support? Who is going to pay for the people to monitor the bank accounts and transactions? Want to take that out of the child support? Well, if the courts assess $600/month in child support, and it costs $500/month to have someone monitor the transactions, then child support suddenly becomes $1100/month with only $600 going to the child. The child support system d…
/r/MensRights13/11/23 06:41 PM
2

Well, admin actions against MGTOW and RedPill groups pushed them here and we are in a constant battle against it.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 08:38 PM
–

Report it. I would be happy to remove it and ban the person who posted it.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 08:37 PM
1

I think you have the wrong subreddit. Perhaps try /r/OffmyChest or something similar.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 03:07 PM
1

Not much different than redpill subs. Seems like that attitude is growing.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 01:17 PM
0

Do you have any source that makes that claim? Or are you making that claim? I have never heard it said that toxic masculinity is about impressing other men.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 01:28 PM
1

SIGH. NO! Your opinion is no more valid than someone else's.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 04:25 PM
3

There are laws requiring that a person check ID for buying cigarettes and alcohol. There aren't laws for ID-ing someone before dating. Are you that dense that you can't see that? There is a glaringly obvious difference between the two situations. One is regulated, one is not.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:10 PM
3

Congratulations. You have employed the Motte and Bailey Fallacy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy If you want to continue to participate in this subreddit, I expect you to actually take the discussion seriously rather than this bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 10:26 PM
4

Clearly you are new here... We don't care about gender. You are "allowed" here as long as you don't harass other people, which is again independent of your gender or perspective. Feminists can discuss on this subreddit, so long as they don't attack men.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 03:05 PM
10

This seems like a better discussion for /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates . They tend to be more receptive to discussions about where egalitarianism is the focus. I suspect you are going to find more people on this subreddit that are staunchly opposed to feminism in all forms out of expressions of anger and frustration. If intersectional feminism was able to actually address men's issues rather than virtue signal to pretend to deal with men's issues, there might be some grounds for discussion. But so far…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 02:56 PM
2

We aren't robots. We sleep.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 01:41 PM
–

A person was kicked out of a private event for trying to upstage the main focus. This is not an issue of men's rights. No one's free speech was violated - it was a private event.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 09:44 PM
12

I wish him a fair hearing, that is based on evidence beyond hearsay/personal stories. If he is guilty, I support punishments appropriate for the crime that are not inflated based on his gender. If he is innocent, I support the media acknowledging his innocence and retracting claims.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 12:45 AM
21

When there are accusations, wait for the legal system to work. Nothing to discuss unless rights aren't being respected.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:34 PM
1

Certainly some subreddits are held to a different standard than others. However, when the admins give you warnings, and you flagrantly violate them, you only have yourself to blame. It is a balance of "is this fair?" and "do we want to stay open?" It is certainly not fair.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 03:20 PM
2

Maybe the moderators of those communities should have followed the rules of reddit?
/r/MensRights16/09/23 03:03 PM
2

People post about it, but we frequently remove the posts. But it can take 2-5 hours before one of us logs on to do that. In that time, many people will have seen the post already.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 03:02 PM
-9

A person who is "involuntarily celibate" is not the same thing as an "incel". The term "incel" has been adopted by a subculture/group to refer to themselves. Similarly, TERFs may claim to be feminists, but not all feminists are TERFs.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 11:04 PM
–

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 03:04 PM
–

Cleared of all charges does not mean that he did not do the things he was accused of, it means that there is insufficient evidence to convict him. In as much as feminists incorrectly act as if accusations mean a person is guilty, acquitting does not mean a person did not commit the crime. Law is more complicated, and it takes a level head to see this situation for what it is. None of us know what actually happened in these situations, and so we have no place to comment on Spacey's guilt or innoc…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 05:53 PM
–

The relationship of this article to men's rights is not clear. There has been significant participation in this thread, and so we will leave the discussion visible, but I think it is important to remember that this is a men's rights sub, not a bashing-women sub.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 09:39 PM
3

/r/MensRights will always welcome you. LWMA does not have great moderators.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/23 05:19 AM
7

I am really glad to see this. Thank you for your continued contributions to the community.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/23 07:22 AM
4

So many MRAs do a terrible job in public debates because they can't control themselves. This is just a good example. Blueorange comes across poorly because he couldn't respect the hosts.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 09:24 PM
1

We have had surveys in the past that show this sub actually leans a little to the left. The problem is that people tend to remember more the things that outrage them. Basically, I am saying that your memory is biased.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 10:25 PM
–

Nothing in the post suggests that having boundaries is misogynistic. You don't get to fabricate an outrage.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 01:52 PM
4

Yes. You aren't very good at debating. First off, you called that a debate. It wasn't. It was a disagreement. So, in the future, don't "debate" people.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 01:49 PM
–

Marital rape can occur if you define rape as sex without consent. In general, there is nothing related to men's rights in the concept of marital rape. The part that makes this a men's rights issue is in the article: Proponents of the marriage strike movement believe that a marital rape law could wrongfully prosecute innocent married men with false rape charges, especially as a means for wives to gain additional alimony in divorce cases. “Already as of now in India, it is a crime for a man to get…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 02:27 PM
1

[Citation needed]
/r/MensRights23/06/23 03:56 PM
–

This thread has been locked. There are a lot of transphobic attacks being made here. We allow people to discuss issues freely, but not attack others. The line was crossed too many times.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 04:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter