TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Plugawy_Nedznik Archive

View 14 posts and 2,920 comments by Plugawy_Nedznik on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Question for BluePillPlugawy_Nedznik/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/15 08:08 AM
11

CMVPlugawy_Nedznik/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 08:54 PM
10

DiscussionPlugawy_Nedznik/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 06:19 AM
9

Plugawy_Nedznik/r/MGTOW14/07/14 07:30 AM
8

CMVPlugawy_Nedznik/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 05:26 AM
5

Plugawy_Nedznik/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 04:00 AM
4

DebatePlugawy_Nedznik/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 09:09 PM
4

DebatePlugawy_Nedznik/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 05:33 PM
3

DiscussionPlugawy_Nedznik/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 05:47 PM
2

Question for BluePillPlugawy_Nedznik/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 04:05 AM
1

DiscussionPlugawy_Nedznik/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 07:33 AM
1

DiscussionPlugawy_Nedznik/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 02:50 PM
0

DebatePlugawy_Nedznik/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 08:20 PM
0

Question for BluePillPlugawy_Nedznik/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 01:37 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,920 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

4) promoting monogamous marriage whenever possible (when there are enough men to go around) motivates all men toward greater productivity. How so? Not being hungry and having a place to sleep is still more important than sex. Surely that should be enough to motivate someone towards productivity? Hey, if you don't want to die, work. Besides, it's not like most humans even have the capacity to judge how much "productivity" they need for a monogamous relationship. Even - or especially - the poor lo…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:43 PM
1

So, you're an introvert and uncomfortable around extroverts. Yes, that sounds pretty normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 09:03 AM
1

Would the development and commercialization of infinite matter replicators result in change to the laws in regards to WMDs? The answer is who cares, it's 100% science fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 08:47 AM
1

They naturally have high standards It's not that women have "high standards", they are simply attracted to alphas and no one else, and the definition of an alpha is being at the top of social hierarchy. Since social hierarchy is entirely relative, there cannot be a set in stone baseline of minimum traits women go for, like a sexual version of "you must be this tall to ride(me)". It's like being rich. Being "rich" just means having more money than most of your peers, there's no clear definitive a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 11:05 AM
2

Not every woman is attracted to "Alpha Men" Semantics. 95%+ of them are, just like 95% of men are attracted to large eyes or low waist-to-hip ratios. And the remaining 5% are homosexuals(so still attracted to particular traits, just the other way), transsexuals and extreme outliers like pedophiles.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 10:58 AM
1

[citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 05:35 AM
1

No, it's a post whether or not women being "able to choose who they sleep with"(which in itself is simplifying the fuck out of it just to serve your cause) is a positive foce in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 05:34 AM
1

FYI, Wall of Berlin wasn't particularly big.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:50 AM
1

I talked to a European man, and he said that this wasn't his experience. Did that "European man" even know what the hell you were talking about? Was he a redpiller, bluepiller or a MGTOW or incel or?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:49 AM
1

Not only that, calling a lover "Babe" is promoting pedo culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:47 AM
2

Woman's life would be fantastic, but unfortunately I'd have to be a woman to experience it. That's kind of a deal breaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:46 AM
4

Why the fuck even post if you are going to shoot down every single suggestion with a pitiful comment. His post answered the topic of this thread. Red Pillers jumped on him for his "defeatist attitude" with unwanted advice that has nothing to do with topic of this thread. So yes, let me ask you back - why the fuck even post?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:45 AM
1

Not only you are strawmanning, you're not even strawmanning on the correct topic. No wonder you're the Emperor of TBP.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:42 AM
1

Women deserve sexual freedom because women are people and all people deserve freedom. Why do all people deserve freedom?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:39 AM
3

A lot of men (e.g. non-assholes) don't want women to have sex with them when the women don't have sex. Men want to have sex with women they find attractive pretty much 20/7. Being an asshole or not has nothing to do with it, they just have strong sex drive. Or what, are you saying men just suddenly stop being attracted or horny when a woman does not reciporate their advances?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:38 AM
1

Is this what this board came to? We have people literally flaunting their ignorance here now, like it's some kind of badge of honor?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:37 AM
0

The topic is how this will affect society, not anyone's feelz. I do, hovewer, find your ridiculous double standard of "we cannot let women perhaps marry men they're not really into because their feelz will be hurt" and "who cares about feelz of those beta losers LOL" hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:33 AM
1

Considering you don't need to be exceptionally looking to be an alpha, your entire point is moot. And that is before we even go to the social inertia.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:30 AM
3

I never use consumables in videogames.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:28 AM
1

Women can acquire offspring easily, but acquiring regular access to food, shelter, and safety is difficult. Not in the environment humans evolved, which is a communal group led by an alpha. In such environment everyone is a provider. The idea that women want "providers" is a myth. Women look almost exclusively for alphas(which is to say, men with high social status), everything else is incidental(i.e. alphas will usually be well off since status = money)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 10:47 AM
1

For woman to be the one with "standards", men must have no "standards" by definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 08:36 AM
1

Which doesn't change my point in any way. For woman to be the one with "standards", men must have no "standards" by definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 08:27 AM
1

And your proof is... an Angelfire page.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 05:19 AM
1

However, people have to forget the idea that women as a group are wired to pair bond for life Uh... no? Monogamy is a very recent idea, around 5000 years old. Polygamy in a single group is normal relationship state for humans, like most other primates.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 05:11 AM
3

Studies such as this one show that female self-report regarding sexual arousal does not correlate with biological markers. Which is great to avoiding damage to your vagina when someone overpowers and rapes you, but matters little when choosing a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 05:07 AM
2

Briffault's law is a observation that women make predictive choices about current states rather than past benefits or future possibilities. Maybe you should google it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 12:20 PM
3

It really is called "Red Pill" for a reason heh.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 05:40 AM
3

lol, because they don't talk about them? They do them naturally. Actually, YOU do it naturally. Your very body is preconditioned to give females of your species preferential treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 05:10 AM
3

Three studies examined gender differences in the effect of storytelling ability on perceptions of a person's attractiveness as a short-term and long-term romantic partner. In Study 1, information about a potential partner's storytelling ability was provided. Study 2 participants read a good or poor story supposedly written by a potential partner. Results suggested that only women's attractiveness assessments of men as a long-term date increased for good storytellers. Storytelling ability did not…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 10:42 AM
3

So the only way to "game the system" is to undermine someone's self esteem?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 10:30 AM
11

But playing off people's emotions and self esteem to get what you want despite the negative consequences to others is a shitty way to approach relationships. Women did this subconsciously and naturally through the entirety of history. Where's your outrage?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 10:29 AM
2

Bloopers feel that RP people prey on insecure women. You don't need to lift, get a hobby or two, dress well, act well and be all-around top dog - all of which TRP advocates - to pull "insecure women". You only need some basic PUA to pull insecure women. So either terpers are vastly overshooting their goal, or you're so desperate to disprove them that you're not even willing to make basic sense anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 10:27 AM
3

So, now that I've had to spell out everything Your ramblings without any source to back them up are meaningless to me. most people in happy relationships are combinations of beta/alpha/sigma and they didn't go after women who were in a "public auction" kind of mood. There's very few women compared to all the men in that meat market. Also, it's been proven that women like storytellers All these are [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 10:22 AM
6

Women fuck guys they like, and for most of us, if we like them enough we have relationships, and marriages, with them. Women fuck guys they like, and for most of us, if we like them enough we have relationships, and marriages, with them. The best way to get into a relationship is to be interesting and find someone who you get along with. Yes, and therefore understanding what kind of fuys do women like and why is the basis of being successive in relationships. And that's TRP, basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 08:47 AM
1

I see you finally dropped any pretense of rationality and are just throwing flat-out platitudes in desperation. Good, good. Maybe soon you'll leave completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 08:45 AM
5

No, they care mostly about social status.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 08:40 AM
3

I wasn't aware YouTube videos qualified as research papers. But I guess when you're a bloop you take any source you can get that supports your fairly tale.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 06:13 AM
3

You can't "outvote" reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 05:12 AM
1

lol, we literally have research papers proving hypergamy, not to mention dozens of statistics. But keep grasping.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 05:11 AM
6

There are a lot of good dead men who'd agree with you. I wonder how many of those good men died trying to impress people like you? Men are expendable. Be successful or die trying. Or don't, then die miserable and alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 12:47 PM
2

So, every sex ever is done with the intent of pregnancy. Okay, I will just stop talking to you now
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 12:00 PM
2

Woman could abort. So yes, she did want the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 11:53 AM
1

Well, if there is top 20%, there's gotta be the bottom 20%. I think you just found some.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 08:43 AM
2

How do you want to understand if you don't even want to think logically? A relationship should be about two people having feelings for each other and making it work with each other regardless of what they want to change in each other and their differences. Its about the emotion behind the relationship being stronger than the qualities that people possess. You're so far deep in your delusions you can't even see reality. Talking to you would be like trying to argue faith out of a religious person.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 08:40 AM
6

OP's post is basically a Just World Fallacy. "everyone really has the same level of problems overall, just in different categories". There is absolutely nothing reasonable about a logical fallacy, which I hope does not need to be explained.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 08:34 AM
3

It is true that women experience emotion differently than men. This does not prove other RP tenets of AWALT such as hypergamy. Of course not. Female hypergamy proves female hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 08:32 AM
1

Aside from the fact it's more biological than conditioned, and not "only women are emotional" but "if you are a man and show weakness no one will take you seriously", you're right!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 08:30 AM
2

So what is your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 08:29 AM
2

Still don't know what ISFJ means.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 08:28 AM
2

Yes, it's astonishing that men have to support a child they did not want in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 08:15 AM
2

for whatever reason
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 08:14 AM
4

As in, if you have sex with a woman, and she gets pregnant for whatever reason because of it, you should have to pay her child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 09:33 AM
2

Rewrite your post in prose please
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 06:47 AM
2

No one should be granted the right to vote just by existing. Actually the whole idea of democracy is pretty retarded. Especially when combined with leftist policies.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 06:43 AM
1

76% Sanders 73% Jill Stein 71% Hillary Clinton 71% Donald Trump 67% Gary Johnson Yep, that mostly agrees with me always scoring in the center in the political compass. My extreme left ideas are only matched by my extreme right ideas
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 06:39 AM
6

I've just read in the Japanese divorce law thread on /r/news that men should universally pay child support "because society".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 05:51 AM
1

Look at the "grass men" in Japan. Accepting their beta fate pretty quietly. Even the clowns at /r9k/ or /r/foreveralone or /r/foreverunwanted are all talk, despite their hurr-durr "gun culture".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 04:00 AM
2

Theoretically that would be completely against our evolution roots. After all, human purpose in life are supposed to be about reproduction. Biology does not tell people "Have kids" Biology tells people "fuck. Fuck! FUCK!" Obviously, offspring should follow from fucking, but we opt out of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 05:56 AM
2

In our current cultural climate, men and women alike are bombarded with messages that sex is very important and that it should be the best thing you've ever experienced. Funny, I had the exact opposite impressions. Sex has been redelegated to a fun active pasttime activity, like... squash
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 05:55 AM
1

Isn't South America basically a shithole?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 05:19 AM
1

Check the numbers. They're on Wiki page.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 06:45 PM
2

What does tech have to do with it? You work because you need money to live. Literally, if you stop working you will run out of money for food and drink and die. And of course you need somewhere to live, something to wear, some way to reach your workplace, and if you can also get some luxury items to relax when not working, well that's just fucking great isn't it. Women don't even come into the picture here. And polygyny is not "gross". Just give it 50-100 more years...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 06:41 PM
2

Still need that citation. Otherwise, don't even bother. The riots in New Orleans after Katrina were larger than the entirety of feminist movement, lol. So whatever you think it proves... it really doesn't
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 06:35 PM
2

Well yeah, but it's a "too bad so sad" kind of thing. "Bottom 80%" will have to do with realdolls, VR and fleshlights.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 08:44 AM
1

Doubting a simplistic conceptual model is the opposite of naïveté. "I am right because I gave more complicated answer" should be some kind of fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 07:06 AM
2

While traditional gender roles made a lot of people miserable Good one. Oh wait, hyperrreal, so you're actually serious. In that case, [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 07:04 AM
4

Girl power came as a result of The Pill and abundance of light work that women could do. Society has nothing to do with it, because it's entirely reactionary in nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 07:03 AM
6

TRP has this silly idea that we need to have monogamy to have civilization, because without the promise of a woman most men will just... lied down and die, I guess? Apparently, men only get education and jobs to impress women and nothing else. I, for one, think we will go back to our "natural" state of polygyny soon enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 06:56 AM
3

I'm sure being a 40 year old man with decent finances because no responsibilities is liberating, but it's meaningless. Everything is meaningless, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 06:52 AM
1

That is a question worth at least seven upvotes as a thread
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 05:08 AM
1

That's... the point...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 05:06 AM
1

Women get emotional support and security from beta behavior, and when they fuck them, it's essentially securing those emotional (and financial) resources for the future. See above: where would this drive even evolve from, if they were always getting all that from the group as a whole?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 12:55 PM
3

Considering almost every fucking human on the planet experienced it at least once and like half of our fucking culture focuses on it and it has been fucking researched and biologically fucking confirmed? Signs point to yes
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 12:53 PM
3

TRP presents a false dichotomy suggesting that if you’re not alpha, you’re basically dirt to women This was basically confirmed and proven by the OkCupid's "80% of males are below average" data. Are you really going to slam your head against this particularly wall again?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 12:50 PM
1

Stereotypes dont work lol, what
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 12:48 PM
2

who sells pot Oh, that instant major boost to your social status as a local drug dealer? How do you want to discuss attractiveness if you don't even know what makes people attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 12:47 PM
2

Evidence clearly and explicitly outlines that humans are responsible for current climate change. Evidence clearly and explicitly outlines that Intelligent Design is not science and a bunch of bullshit. Evidence clearly and explicitly outlines that "Social Studies" is baseless nonsense. Evidence clearly and explicitly outlines that vaccines don't cause autism. Want me to go on or are you getting the hint yet?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 12:45 PM
3

I actually have a friend who is in LTR with a guy that looks like a loser to me and it's not like she doesn't have any other options (she's 20 and pretty attractive). There is this shitty thing called "Romantic love" you know
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 12:44 PM
4

Laws against revenge porn: In the past two days, there have been two different threads in TwoX in which hidden cameras were discovered. What hidden cameras have to do with revenge porn? Affirmative consent: Every time this comes up, there seems to be a narrative that it is impossible to gain enthusiastic consent without sacrificing The Mood. That it is natural for men to ravage women without their permission Strawman as fuck Cheating: I have seen it argued that while it is reprehensible for a wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 11:43 AM
1

Another overused term for attention whores to label themselves with
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 11:37 AM
0

I liked that statistic where over 60% of Americans believes Biblical Flood actually really happened. Sixty fucking percent. Of adult people with jobs, kids, houses. And those are people who vote. That is amazing to think about.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 06:52 AM
7

Assault At Common Law, an intentional act by one person that creates an apprehension in another of an imminent harmful or offensive contact. An assault is carried out by a threat of bodily harm coupled with an apparent, present ability to cause the harm. Like this But with dicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 06:51 AM
0

Except for the hundreds of years (if not longer) from ~1950 back when strong social pressure to marry and strong taboos against promiscuity did a decent job of checking hypergamy. What? Women still got their hypergamy fix by marring men with money when they themselves did not have any. Then we let them have jobs(=money) and suddenly divorces skyrocket while marriages plummet. Hmmm, I wonder why! Must be the culture! The whole point of society is to regulate "base human nature" You couldn't be mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 06:48 AM
1

I wonder about this, because what women have to gaing from fucking betas? I would argue that female drive for alphas is just particularly strong during their ovulation. When men sleep, they get erections during REM and no one tries to make some "turn-on, turn-off" dichotomy out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 05:22 AM
0

Radfems aren't handing out condoms at schools -- that's mainstream. Radfems aren't marketing sex symbols in increasingly explicit ways -- that's mainstream. Radfems aren't making hookup apps -- that's mainstream. But these are all reactionary to hypergamy, not creating it lol. Ask Texas how abstinence only education is working out for them. There's no "arguing" with base human nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 05:18 AM
1

There's no way to actually fix this problem. I just like to argue
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 12:36 PM
2

The sidebars for all pills are terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 12:22 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuestions/comments/2xnvae/what_is_with_all_the_pill_subreddits/cp1sdye
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 12:20 PM
1

Funny how you people will readily laugh and call TRP "paranoid" for exactly the same worries about marriage, but when it comes to risk of being violently rejected, even though it's smaller by order of magnitude than divorce rape, then it suddenly becomes the absolute excuse. I'm sorry you've been shot down before Your false sympathy won't win you any favors.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 12:17 PM
1

Why would you only count what is "really necessary in western civilization"? That's a very narrow, not to mention naive, definition of superiority.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 12:07 PM
2

Right. They should approach women, just get ready to be shot down multiple times in the most condescending way possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 11:52 AM
1

Isn't OP's as well? Why wouldn't it be?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 11:47 AM
1

In a fight the taller person has an advantage. There you go - superiority.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 11:02 AM
1

Then think long and hard now: if men shouldn't approach you ever because you're afraid, and you never approach men because reasons, what's the end result?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 11:01 AM
0

are asian people superior to white people? By your standards, they probably are. They are shorter. That alone puts this theory into doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 10:43 AM
0

False. Women always have it better.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 10:41 AM
-1

What would you call teaching girls that they can sleep around, postpone commitment until they're in their mid-30s, and still wind up happy if not "blue pill indoctrination"? Lies, mostly? Who says that? Radfems? About two generations ago women were taught that if they sleep around men will think they're unsuitable partners. And they still slept around. Remember that whole hippie thing? They've slept around since The Pill in 1960. Because they could.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 05:19 AM
2

Okay, medium rare
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 12:09 PM
1

Elliot Rodgers was a Beta. Random psychos happen. Given the overall population of /r9k/, they seem to happen less in betas, not more.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 11:14 AM
2

A rare example of a thread where the question in the topic is good, but the body of OP is worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 05:19 AM
1

That one goes too far in the other direction
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 05:18 AM
1

Except betas will never "rise" because well... they're betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 05:08 AM
2

A) I never said anything like that. But you did, lol. "Everyone should be whoever they want to be hurrr" yeah, it doesn't work that way. You can make whatever laws you want but culture will not follow. B) You're arguing that we need less freedom? Is this how America becomes great again? Less personal freedom? America is probably the country with highest personal freedom on Earth and it's not working out for them precisely because most of its citizens are too irresponsible to operate in such envi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 05:22 PM
2

No, it's naive to think that a) everyone lives in some kind of vacuum where other people's opinions don't affect them, and b) that people are responsible enough to be able to enjoy "freedom" and not fuck up everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 04:30 PM
3

Holy shit the denial is real
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 04:28 PM
2

There are two kinds of love. Romantic love and familial love. Romantic love is basically crack cocaine and schizophrenia. It works like common cold: comes out of nowhere, cannot be cured, but will pass away on its own eventually. Familial love is basically strong sense of attachment. As all kinds of attachment, it requires time and not disliking the object in question to begin with to develop. Is it possible to smoothly slide from romantic love when it ends into familial love? Absolutely. But it…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 06:52 AM
1

The whole point of progressive culture is FREEDOM. Freedom from religious and social oppression that demands everyone conform to a predetermined norm. If you want to go to church twice a week, remain virgin until marriage, and think oral and anal sex are satanic, that's your call. But your opinions (or anyone else's) should not impinge on anyone else's life choices. Which is such a hopelessly naive view that... Well, it could only be held by a progressivist.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 06:48 AM
1

The very idea of "progressivism" is completely absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 06:46 AM
9

It takes five minutes with Google to get hard data that right is very much on the rise. Off the top of my head, Austria dodged a blatantly right-wing government by a thread(30k votes), and Trump went from "lol millionaire clown" to a presidental candidate that actually has very good chance of winning. But keep denying reality. It is, after all, what leftists do best.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 06:43 AM
11

I don't know anyone who says a jilted man isn't allowed to feel pain or seek understanding. You have every right to feel what you feel. But you are putting so much energy into training for the emotional assaults you expect to get from women. Instead perhaps the energy could be put to better use? Self improvement with you as the focal point? For example if you set firm boundaries & communicate the boundaries clearly, it makes it much harder to feel used. This... is pretty much exactly what TRP sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 06:38 AM
3

That's what everyone said after civil rights in the 60's. Or when we got women the vote. Or when we abolished slavery before that. [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 06:36 AM
8

The survey’s definition of sexual assault ranges from “sexual harassment, stalking, and intimate partner violence” to “nonconsensual penetration” and “nonconsensual touching.” So basically any "creep that eyeballed me" is sexual harassment. Same nonsense as the 2007 study.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 06:27 AM
5

You know, for all that talk about how women need "beta features" in males it hasn't really been shown. People assume women want "providers" because for the longest time in marriage the male role was that of a "provider" but marriage itself is a bastardization of a base female hypergamy applied to economy of personal property which restricts male-female relationship to 1:1 ratio for maximum efficiency. But even in this classic marriage it all happened according to basic rules of hypergamy: men ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 05:52 AM
2

Prove where the data or methodology of the video are incorrect. I already said that logical fallacies get you nowhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 05:18 AM
1

My mother's cousin molested her and all her sisters. Why aren't you saying that all, or at least most, men are molesters then? Maybe we should let kids have some kind of way of opting out of families, because otherwise it just leads to molestation? And my paternal aunts were all fully beaten black and blue by the loving husbands but never called the police. If even they didn't care, why would I?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 08:03 AM
1

And in my family, I can point to a 50% domestic violence rate. Sure, and 20% of women were sexually abused. You only need to define words the way they best fit your agenda.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 07:53 AM
2

Washing machines existed in the fifities. And Microwave? lol you shouldn't be using it even if you have one. The only thing which might not be as widespread as I am imagining it to be is the domestic violence. No shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 07:45 AM
1

Basically, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 07:14 AM
3

If you're going to just drop platitudes, don't post.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 07:10 AM
6

We really need a fallacy for when you basically conclude that "If it's not white, it must be black".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 07:07 AM
2

Archiwnger desribes all of it in this neat post: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2tqbf8/the_number_one_mistake_of_married_women_marrying/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 05:13 AM
1

There are an awful lot of couples out there who aren't in the top 10% of attractive people. But TRP will tell you their relationships are doomed. Well it's more like top 20% but that's basically true, and can very easily be explained: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vqRbScCIPU Uh, what a sad way to view the world. When you start your post with a logical fallacy, don't write it at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 05:04 AM
1

its when men cant be attracted to their wives once they become mothers. u wot gal
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 05:02 AM
1

This is one of the worst articles with one of the worst graphs I've ever seen. The Guardian looks like a scientific journal compared to this. Look, US data about things like marriage is very easy to find on the official CDC site. You really have no excuse to link to some shit-written nonsense when trying to make a point about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 04:59 AM
2

Did someone really just told me that having a day off from work every day is some kind of an issue? Is this what's happening?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 04:52 AM
4

I think "femsplaining" would roll off the tongue better
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 04:52 AM
6

I don't think the men who invented The Pill really "thought" anything. People who wanted their SO to not get pregnant only thought sex without condoms feels better. People who invented it were too occupied to solve this particular problem. People who funded the research only thought about selling the product. Let's not get into the "Marriage was invented as a scheme to make betas work" Patriarchal conspiracy nonsense again.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/16 07:06 AM
1

questioningwoman, once all this is over, write a book about how PPD saved your life or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/16 05:17 AM
3

Cultivate interests? So guys have to change their hobbies, get lots of money, be appealing, not be socially awkward and any other number of things including but not limited to uniformly shifting their entire life around and sense of self, and women have to do what, exactly? Spend an average of 55 minutes every day on makeup, for starters.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 06:19 PM
2

Dude, that channel you linked. Dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 02:43 PM
1

So firstly, what is an emotional connection? How do you know if you have one? Are there different degrees of it? Oh. I though you're going to tell us.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 02:39 PM
2

For every message in my inbox? no
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 11:05 AM
2

You can see my flair yes? Not in my inbox, no
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 10:52 AM
1

This is PPD. You have to speak loudly, slowly, and simply, especially to bloops. Let's start with estabilishing that not in every relationship "both sides are using each other equally" and move on from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 04:51 AM
0

Another desperate bloop? Well, at least I don't recognize your nickname yet, so I will actually point out to you that a slave does not use their master.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 11:21 AM
4

Why? I would assume because you are on an obviously losing position in this discussion so you must come with the most absurd nonsense to even try and stay in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 11:19 AM
9

Holy shit your denial is simply desperate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 10:56 AM
1

Do you inform people when removing their comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 10:38 AM
3

As TBP would put it, these are all outliers
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 10:34 AM
5

I think deriving a large part of your self-worth from the sex you are or aren't having is bad for you So? That's our nature, no matter how "bad for you" you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 10:33 AM
12

Do tell me, if a man calls a woman and tells her "Be at my place in 20 minutes 'cuz I want to fuck", and she's at his place in 20 minutes, who is the disposable fucktoy here?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 10:31 AM
1

It was not a personal attack. Unless you're very touchy on the topic of being called FU that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 05:10 AM
3

Was it good for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 12:39 PM
3

I was supposed to add that a leftist like you wouldn't understand since you were brainwashed that hate is a negative and therefore "wrong" emotion, but bit my tongue. Serves me right.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 12:08 PM
1

I mean, who could love or want a person who thinks this way? How fortunate we are, that we cannot read minds.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 11:20 AM
1

Are you bothered that a kid takes what he reads as facts so readily? Or do you find it commendable that he knows so much red pill 'truths' at an early age? What good are TRP "truths" for a 30 year old beta? Aside from the general satisfaction of having "figured it all out"?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 11:19 AM
3

TRP spews hate on a daily basis. And most of it is well deserved.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 11:14 AM
1

Personality does not make a woman attracted to a man. /r/foreverunwanted is leaking again.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 11:13 AM
4

ITT OP tries to stir TRP up with a "you too" post; TRP instead overwhelmingly agrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 11:09 AM
1

There are significantly more women he can talk to than there are in his immediate real-life surroundings. A bigger population increases his odds. First you need to get to the "talk" stage. This argument works both ways, why would a woman waste time with an unattractive man when there's 1000 others to check? The text-only start means he can be sub-par in a personal interaction (bad posture, less-than-confident speaking voice, can't command the attention of a group) and still at least line up a da…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 05:49 AM
3

So this leads to another question, if women had a more ideal, more unconditional love where they picked a man and loved him even if he got lazy, lost his job, failed at life, would humanity stagnate? "Stagnate"? What does the even mean? Humanity's been exempt from the basic laws of evolution ever since we made the first fire in the first cave.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 05:43 AM
8

People will do what they can easily get away with. That's why I never owned a music album in my life, and women will cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 05:40 AM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 03:04 PM
9

In addition to what /u/duckyhunter said, MGTOW and incelship in general gives you magical powers. No, seriously. A man that is incel long enough will eventually be able to view women objectively. Or at least more objectively that your average Joe. And for men, that really is almost a superpower. You wouldn't believe all the ways in which we are conditioned to "put pussy on the pedestal", as TRP calls it. Have you ever attended a social gathering that you really weren't into? Like a party where y…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 06:11 AM
1

What is the goal of China?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 05:00 AM
1

...because they think it looks good on them? And why thinking they look good makes them feel good about themselves? You can move the goalposts all you like, eventually you'll have to arrive at the end. Yes, how dare I feel that every person is unique Thinking that everyone is unique is self-serving and a domain of followers, not leaders. Don't flatter yourself, you don't deserve it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 05:00 AM
5

Of course not, after all it's not based on ~feelings~ and ~progressive morality~ and does not draw a world where everyone can be happy together. So how could it be convincing - to a leftist? But that's not a problem with TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 11:27 AM
5

They can't account for any slow build attraction, or enthusiastic pair bonding based on anything other than a preference for dominant masculinity. Because there's nothing to account for. How many times can you repeat the same backed arguments, while hearing nothing but trite platitudes in response? Talking to bloops is literally like talking at a wall. Why put any effort into it, if the result is the same whether you write 2000 or 20 words?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 11:22 AM
1

Men love looks. Your looks hardly change, unless you have a serious accident. And thanks to modern cosmetics you can look good up to 40. Women equally love looks, character and social status. Two of these are very much variable. That's what terpers mean when they say that "Men love unconditionally" and "Women have no honor".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:31 AM
8

No, a strong leader with a clear vision is vital to any "joint" endeavor. As evidenced by pretty much the entirety of human history: single best generals winning wars, single dictators who conquer half the world, single CEOs starting with nothing and creating multi-billion corporations... Other people are needed to make things happen, but they just shut the fuck up and follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:28 AM
1

You do realize that when no men are around women will still put effort into their visual appearance No they don't. Go ask /r/twoxchromosomes how they dress/act when they know they will stay at home all day and don't expect visitors.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:05 AM
4

So in addition to human biological imperatives, there are also some "personal desires" that are completely separate? What next, will you try to argue that humans have souls?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 10:50 AM
5

That's like saying you eat to feel satisfied when full, and not dying of hunger is the "byproduct" of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 10:37 AM
0

My question to you is, do women, when they go out to parties, where dresses up to there butt, or showing some of their butt, and other articles of revealing clothing, to garner a sexual response from males? Dresses up the butt? Revealing clothing? Try "makeup". Try "push-up bras". Try "high heels". Try "yoga pants". Try "I'm not wearing a hat in winter because it will ruin my hairstyle". Whenever heterosexual women expect to meet anyone, 99% of them will dress to attract males. It's so ingrained…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 10:21 AM
6

Some do because it makes them feel good. And why do they feel good when attractive? The fact that the women cannot seem to ever make the connection that they make themselves attractive to attract males, and always fall back to the "I do it for myself!" bullshit, is the best proof that they all come pre-equipped with an industrial-grade hamster.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 10:17 AM
2

Or you just stick to one car. A car that's both dependable and sexy. So, a Sport Utility Vehicle? Even the name is self-contradictory.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 06:00 AM
2

Become a camwhore.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 05:57 AM
8

Everyone tends to do that lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 05:56 AM
2

I don't think I'll ever be in a relationship either way, but I'd do it because women suck
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 05:55 AM
6

And here comes the bloop with that obligatory strawman. [Edit]Finally found it: http://imgur.com/Yy98Hlt
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 02:37 PM
2

Again I can do naught but quote RLM: "He should be spontaneous, but only when I expect it"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 04:14 AM
4

It would work like this. Two people, would go to some office, or station, where under camera surveillance, or personal observation, would sign a contract, consenting to sexual activity with one another Aaand she's dry.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 04:08 AM
4

Harassment from r/foreverunwanted has gotten so bad that r/foreverunwanted has been private since last week. I asked what harassment exactly was done and... apparently they've been linking the /r/foreveralonewomen sub. They've been linking a website and that's constitutes as harassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 03:40 AM
1

Regardless of whether gender roles are legit or not, you do agree that people shouldn't have to be follow them if they don't want to, right? No. Most people are at the level of children. They need to have clear ground rules or they just end up hurting themselves, in short or long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 05:11 PM
1

Well, it's technically true. Remember, leftists are all about the minor exceptions. Especially when focusing on them hurts the majority as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 05:10 PM
2

It can. It just has to tell the wife to listen to her man what he finds attractive and at accordingly. The wife does the same and acts accordingly. If women could properly articulate what they really find attractive in men we wouldn't be in the shit we are now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 09:56 AM
4

Anita says that the media brainwashed men to think that they're owed a girl for saving her etc. (essentially for being nice). How the fuck can you equate conquering 99 castles and fighting 99 bosses to get the girl with "being nice"? Remember that shitty hipster movie, Scott Pilgrim Against The World? Would you say that the reason he got the chick in the end was for "being nice"?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 09:54 AM
1

The problem with transgender people, just like all the minorities, are not the transgenders(minorities) themselves, but their leftist heterosexual(majority) champions, always bent on to make their situation better at the expense of everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 09:52 AM
0

Guys we thought of new rules to make this board even more of a cumbersome shithole, what do you think? "Shit tier." "2/10" "Kill yourself if you implement that" Okay here you go! It's almost like elections are here already
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 09:50 AM
2

Though it lacks a flair, this question is specifically for RP. If you want to BP circlejerk, do it in the green automod post.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 09:51 AM
2

But TRP doesn't. That's the chief difference between TRP and MRA and likely MGTOW(depends on the kind of MGTOW).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 09:41 AM
1

Oh, so you're just strawmanning then. Carry on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 09:28 AM
1

However, many studies that compare behaviors of men and women find little to no differences. Link them. In my view, those that believe men and women are very different, just aren't looking at them deeply enough. If they did, they'd find that the core emotions of men and women are the same. On the second thought, don't bother. Anyone who uses phrase like "core emotions" cannot possibly have a faintest fucking clue about what they're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 09:08 AM
1

We say "you will find someone that likes you for who you are" Well, at least you admit to that blatant lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 09:06 AM
1

Okay? Do you have a point to make here, or do you just like jumping to extremes?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 09:05 AM
3

Manipulation is manipulation. It does not matter whether it's done "purposefully" or not. If my wife is witholding sex to "teach me a lesson", I get no sex. If she is witholding sex because she simply has lower libido than me(as is in 90% of relationships), I get no sex. Either way, I get no sex and am unhappy and are more likely to end the relationship. There is no line here. You can either accept that humans are all inherently and permeatingly manipulative to everyone - which is a simple fact …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 09:02 AM
1

Once again TRP ideas about desirable qualities in women noticeably fail to include shared values and lifestyle, common interests, good communication skills, honesty, hard work, a commitment to self-improvement, or any of the dozens of other traits that make up a good relationship. Because none of these make a good romantic relationship. They make a good friendship. Good friendship is not a good romantic relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 08:57 AM
1

That's where the red pill comes in, to say that women care as much about looks as men do Except they don't, which was proven hundreds of times, mostly by TRP itself. That's why the main advice on TRP is "lift, get good, be confident" and not "get a plastic surgery for a square jaw, leg extension for height, and a hair transplant"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 10:33 AM
1

I've seen two studies comparing BMI and WHR and their impact on female attractiveness. One gave BMI 0.5 correlation; the other went up to 0.7. In other words, as a woman, all you have to do is not be fat and you're already halfway there. Is that "too high of a standard"? To have healthy body weight? I don't think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 10:26 AM
2

And here I hoped SkinnySweaty stopped posting
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 10:16 AM
7

Trump: leftists hate him, so I am sympathetic to him and his cause /r/the_donald is great, like 4chan back when it was good
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 10:10 AM
-1

"Another bullshit leftist buzzword"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/16 02:17 AM
3

Nah, most of us love men. *the man
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/16 04:45 AM
1

The "innate nature" of women to be lying cheating gold digging whores is pure nonsense. Anyone can act that way given the right set of tools and the motivation. Doesn't really matter in the end though, whether it's nature or nurture.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/16 04:42 AM
1

Good for you. Most men do though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/16 04:58 PM
3

I don't think it has much to do with being "taught not to be sexist". Unless you also want to tell me that we should "teach men not to rape". It makes about as much sense. Men just love women. Really we have no choice, that's just how our brains are wired. If it looks and/or behaves remotely like a woman, we have to put it on a pedestal. The opposite is not true. Women are only conditioned to love their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/16 04:55 AM
2

Genetic. They should be able to get married, if they are stupid enough to do so. They should be able to raise children, if they are irresponsible enough to do so. I don't have any gay friends nor do I know anyone gay. I have no idea what "gay culture" is. My biggest problem with homosexuals is all the straight liberals who constantly throw tantrums about how the fact that two dudes can't get married is literally the worst problem of [country] right now. 50% divorce rate? Irrelevant. 1/3 children…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/16 04:46 AM
1

Okay, you could be both leftist and Red. Let us never doubt the power of the Hamster. Just, you know. If you were to make any sense, you wouldn't be both.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 07:15 PM
1

Leftism is not compatible with the red pill philosophy, and seems like an extension of the alt-right. Thoughts? Obviously? Leftism is based on emotions instead of logic and grounded in perpetuating the same feel-good lies instead of accepting the less pleasant reality. You couldn't possibly be red and leftist, or vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 06:58 PM
4

Because the real issue of many foreveralone types is feeling unwanted, and a guy wanting you only because your vagina feels better than his hand, how does that make you feel wanted again? At least you are wanted for a reason. And at least you get some human contact, even if it's just his groin slapping against your ass. That's still 100% more than what male FAs get.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 06:55 PM
2

How do you know the man you're dating is not a murderer?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 06:52 PM
1

TRP is the easy way out Oh, you are one of those people
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 02:43 AM
0

Don't ask me, I'm not an alpha. But she got a lot of offers from good quality guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 10:27 PM
0

Women do though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 08:15 PM
4

Why would "a woman that look like her" go fuck an incel if she can fuck an alpha? The only cognitive dissonance here is yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 08:12 PM
5

What would qualify as TRP under the hood? In my relationship, I like to tease my girlfriend and I'm not doing stuff for her all the time. And I exercise to keep fit. Is that very TRP under the hood? Quite so, actually, yes. Because for decisions, we both have an equal say in it How do you figure? How do you measure how "equal" say is? How do you know she is not just going with whatever you say because she says you as the leader in the relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 08:10 PM
3

If he's not hot and he's dating hot women he's being used for money and she's being used for sex. So... a perfectly normal heterosexual relationship then?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/16 03:59 AM
4

Welcome to PPD!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/16 03:56 AM
1

A
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 08:36 PM
3

Do you think civilization would survive without women? I think it would survive just fine if men locked all women in breeding camps.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 08:30 PM
1

For the most part, biology doesn't support that assumption. :I'm saying that there was a time in history where "settling down in exchange for resources" didn't make much sense because resources were attributed to the group, not to a single mate. In such a scenario "alphaness" would actually play a bigger factor in sexual attraction than resources would. Well you certainly seem to support it! Bargaining power would be weaker in more communal societies and rank would play a much bigger role. Yes, …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 05:15 PM
2

tl;dr - "It's really hard to say anything with 100% certainty in evolutionary psychology, so it's better to not say anything at all" How useful! I see your education really pays for itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 05:10 AM
0

Well, do gay men cuddle with women? Here is your answer. Hint: it's "no".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 05:05 AM
4

Basically complete bullshit. Where do you live, European?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 05:01 AM
1

Red pillers (and many other people) assume that family units, a concept of paternity, long-term pair bonding, property inheritance through paternal lineage, and monogamy existed back in nomadic times. No. What existed in "nomadic times" is pure hypergamy where women fucked the biggest alpha around. This is precisely the mechanic that TRP tries to exploit most of the time. So what you are saying is that they on one hand try to exploit female hypergamy and attraction to alphas and on the other han…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 04:58 AM
0

What. TRP tries to understand what human nature is, specifically when it comes to intersex relationships. It tries to understand what the basic biological drives are. That doesn't mean it says you should always act according to these basic biological drives. In fact in many cases it specifically advises against acting according to them. According to basic biological drives, you'd want to pamper your woman and believe she is an unicorn and then marry her and have unprotected sex to make a dozen b…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 04:47 AM
2

I consider myself a red piller because I agree that women are turned on by men with looks/power/frame/pre-selection/status and men are turned on by women who have sweetness/youth/submissiveness/looks, but that's it. So... you do admit that differences in the way men and women love the opposite gender exist? It's funny that women are said to be the ones who are "solipsistic" even though male solipsism is present in so many posts by angry red pill men who argue that men are so much better because …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/16 04:13 AM
-1

Keep proving betterdeadthanbeta's argument about female intellectual inferiority.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 07:29 PM
0

I am answering OP directly. If you want to blame someone for assuming, blame him, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 07:07 PM
0

lol i trol u That's actually against the rules of this sub, you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 07:03 PM
0

Many divorces (I would say most) have absolutely nothing to do with sex whatsoever. They're just couples who are bored of each other and have grown apart. The idea that women dump men because they're not alpha enough and they inevitably end up craving alpha cock again is just bollocks. It's fucking horseshit. You're horseshit. The very fact that the marriage has a dead bedroom is a clear sign that the woman is not attracted to the man. So she does not have sex with him. So the man does not care …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 06:59 PM
3

Okay, but what's your point? That therefore TRP shouldn't exist? Well guess what, clothes should not exist either. They allow people with inferior metabolism to survive. Bad for gene pool and evolution. Also, I wonder if you are pro-eugenics?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 06:54 PM
4

Not really. More like 6 months. Most utilities are automatic, or at least self-correcting, including nuclear power. You have absolutely no idea what you're even talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 04:32 AM
0

The impotent rage of bloops in this thread is like a salve for my soul. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 04:04 AM
1

You don't even know what "trolling" means, kiddo, so stop using that word.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 03:56 AM
2

You want to play the "average" card? Sure, let's play the "average" card. Here's a little thought experiment for you: let's imagine that, right this instant, all men OR women disappear from the face of the Earth. What do you imagine the consequences of that would be? Let me give you a hint: Men disappear: in less than 24 hours you are left without electricity/water/central heating/food/every type of media/healthcare and shit is flooding your house through the toilet. God help you if you live in …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 03:54 AM
1

The "best" suffragettes did was camp the white house and got themselves arrested. Once.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 03:46 AM
2

That's... beautiful
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 03:43 AM
2

What other meaning would it have? "Institutionalized" means "coming from the institutions", i.e. national institutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 06:48 PM
1

In military, you are expected to be combat-ready no matter what your actual role is. Even officer schools have fitness tests and marksmanship lessons.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 06:47 PM
1

That does not answer OP's question.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 06:46 PM
1

Except it's very easy to turn sex into relationship. You just say "sex, but only if you date me". BAM, relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 04:57 PM
1

I ain't no cultural relativist, our egalitarian values are better than other societies and people in other time periods. lol, on what basis do you say this?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 04:02 AM
3

Sure. I'm a Wizard and consider myself RP, just a non-practicing one.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 11:16 PM
9

So let me get this straight: safe spaces exist to protect the sensitive from judgment, and TRP is the same for the insensitive - that is, people who don't need protection in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 11:15 PM
0

So many baseless assumptions and claims I won't even bother. Lol, leftists.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 10:14 PM
7

That ideal which led to 50% divorce rate and largest general unhappiness in relationships in the past century? What a time to be alive! Today, women can be stay at home moms No they cannot, because one person's income is not enough to support a family. Thanks to feminism and women entering the workforce, incidentally. or have careers that were previously male-dominated. And if they try not to, feminists will be there to remind me what gender traitors they are. We are even seeing the emergence of…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 09:17 PM
2

I don't think such data is useful at all because people are for the most part completely fucking ignorant about how relationships work(thanks to the permeating leftist brainwashing) and what is actually important. So when I see a reason like "infidelity" I see either a man not attracted to his wife(i.e. because she got fat), or a wife not attracted to her husband(because he's a beta bux, which is not attractive, which means she won't have sex with him, which causes him to look for sex elsewhere)…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 09:11 PM
3

The ideal world isn't one where traditional roles are enforced, nor where perfect equality is enforced. It's one where people are given the freedom to do either, depending on their preferences and abilities. Such ideal world does not, and cannot, exist. And giving people complete freedom is actually a horrible fucking idea, but that's another topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 09:00 PM
9

Sure they can. If they're ugly. Then they lose their "female privilege". Note that this is just about the only way for women to lose that privilege. There are two issues to consider here hovewer: It's hard for women to actually be ugly. Altering your apperance with makeup and shit is not only socially acceptable, it's practically expected. Even 3/10 can easily pass as 5-6/10 as long as she takes care of herself. That is the cut-off point for women, much, much lower than the one for men(even if m…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 08:56 PM
1

You are a "functioning, respectable member of society" when you hold a (legal) job. That's about the only requirement, and it's not very hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 01:20 AM
1

Life is not black and white, it's a massive fuck off grey area. In the same spirit, it's not red or blue either. Red is not Black and Blue is not White. Red = "world is grey" Blue = "world is black and white"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 01:18 AM
1

"Men with higher levels of hostile sexism describe themselves using adjectives associated with masculinity, i.e. physically strong, brave, sure of themselves, determined, admirable, etc," Garaigordobil said. "Women who display hostile sexism described themselves using characteristics that go against femininity, such as not very cooperative, not very tolerant, not very compassionate and not very sensitive or sentimental." I thought "masculine" and "feminine" were sexist terms How meta
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 01:15 AM
1

You first dated a jackass then settled with a beta. How the hell does that no fit the AFBB model?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:03 PM
1

For example, women go after different kinds of men as they age. It's just about maturing and growing up, just how people might have different kinds of friends or eating habits. People change, mature, learn what works and what doesn't. But women don't sleep around with muscular aloof assholes until 30, at which point they find an unwitting beta to marry when they realize they can't do better. So which one is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 03:29 AM
6

They're is entire beauty industry telling women they need make up, weight loss pills, baby smooth legs, ect to get a man..... No they don't. Not to "Get a man".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 01:11 AM
1

SCRATCH HARDER!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 12:51 AM
3

I don't think any of these questions is directly related to evolutionary psychology.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 12:50 AM
2

From their having male(or at least more male) brains.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 12:49 AM
14

What? If you outright say that what you want in a man is height, tight body and great hair no short fat neckbeard is going to bother you. If you bullshit that what you really want is a "nice guy to cuddle with" then the barrier of entry is basically zero. Prepare your inbox.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 10:12 AM
2

k
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 07:50 PM
3

All you are showing is that they are more/less manipulative/whatever than some other group.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 07:49 PM
2

k
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 07:48 PM
2

Knowing that it will never lead to anything? That seems like a borderline teasing/orgasm denial fetish to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 07:22 PM
8

It's been proven countless times that asking women about anything relationship-related is at best useless. Also, it's "Debate" not "Question for women".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 07:20 PM
2

I just retracted them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 07:14 PM
2

Under your system, if a man leaves his wife when she's past the "wall" she has no options. She takes half of his stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 07:08 PM
2

Oh, that. Well then whatever, hovewer it worked back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 07:03 PM
0

http://memesvault.com/wp-content/uploads/Feels-Good-Man-Frog-14.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 07:02 PM
2

She inherits the house and therefore becomes homeless? What the fuck are you even talking about now?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 05:41 PM
2

Do you realize a flaw under your system is that women have no rights to live in a house after their husband dies or did you never think about that? And here I thought property passes on to the next of kin.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 05:37 PM
2

I don't think you realize that I'm not some kind of official representative of TRP. I don't post there, I'm not even subscribed. Proving I'm a horrible person does nothing for you. Answer the question. Ideally, I'd prefer if women had same rights as men, but were simply socially encouraged to stay in their gender role. There are, after all, genius women and it would be unoptimal to "lose" them by telling them to stay in the kitchen. But that might be too idealistic of a viewpoint, so if I had to…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 04:56 PM
2

Because I was trying to make a fair system in the question idiot. And as I've proven, you can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 04:33 PM
3

Stop deflecting. If all you care about is yourself then you should be just fine with feminism alone. After all you're not a man, so why would you care if they're drafted or not? Why would you care if they pay alimony or not? Hell, them paying alimony is actually in your favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 04:29 PM
5

Neither of these addresses my claim. Try again?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 02:10 PM
10

I could easily disprove your statement. No.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 01:04 PM
11

Like for example the "Women don't love you the way you love them" bit. You think by pointing out that TRP says that you are proving them "wrong" because "It's obvious that this is not true". Except it's not obvious that it's not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 01:03 PM
8

I am not asking you. I am making a proof by comparison that what you said is impossible to answer and incredibly stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 01:00 PM
11

"Why is OP trying to spin this as something negative?" type confusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 12:54 PM
4

I have a favourite example for times like these. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15978839 The perception of female voices, when compared with male voices, affected greater activation of the right anterior superior temporal gyrus, near the superior temporal sulcus. Similarly, male voice perception activated the mesio-parietal precuneus area. These different gender associations could not be explained by either simple pitch perception or behavioural response because the activations that we obser…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 12:50 PM
5

Selfish as fuck though. Unless the man is gay, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 12:34 PM
9

All women are manipulative, backstabbing, gold-digging whores. Prove me wrong, OP. I won't accept circumstantial observations. I won't accept repeating BP theory or aphorisms. I mean actual evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 12:33 PM
15

TFW OP writes something with the intent of invoking outrage in the readers, but you feel nothing. Maybe a little confusion. FeelsGoodMan.jpg (don't fail me now image bot!)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 12:30 PM
1

Romantic love = commitment, partnership, loyalty. Cannot confirm. Was in love once, had none of these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 04:22 PM
0

What does love have to do with commitment now? You can love someone not commited to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 05:04 AM
3

Men didn't have to be 'masculine' in the 19th century either because women were chained to them through law and economics. They had to be masculine precisely because women were "chained" to them. When you're the sole(or at least main) breadwinner for the family you have to shape the fuck up because you have this responsibility on you. On the other hand, modern(21st century) world strips people of all responsibility and then boasts about it since it's so "progressive" and "civilized" to never hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 04:25 AM
0

#nocooties
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 04:10 AM
2

Women: want commitment What for? They can just get a job and no commitment needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 04:09 AM
5

Obviously? The point of the rant is to... rant, not to write a plan to solve all your problems or whatever. That's like saying "I don't know why American graduates on Reddit rant about not being able to find a job all the time, instead of just working on their CVs and connections to find a job"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 11:12 PM
9

No? For a man relationship(with a woman) without sex is pretty much worthless. Sex is what makes relationship a relationship. So cutting it down to "sex = relationship" is absolutely viable.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 11:05 PM
2

Yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 10:57 PM
4

I wouldn' care Just like I don't care about this thread
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 10:56 PM
1

"Red Pill" is basically applied philosophical realism. "The Red Pill" is RP applied to intersex relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 10:55 PM
7

More like they just do the basic sex = relationship equation. If you're an incel, no one wants to fuck you. If no one wants to fuck you, obviously you won't find a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 10:50 PM
1

Traditionally women have been characterised (by men) as the weaker sex, irrational and overly-emotional. This. I doubt the majority of people consciously believe that's the actual truth any more but I do think it has persisted as a sort of subliminal bias in our society. Not this though.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 10:48 PM
7

AFBB. In one person.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 10:46 PM
2

Nah, sounds too racist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 04:23 AM
2

Thoughts? http://b.thumbs.redditmedia.com/9XLlV4x6vMSRvJwED0HZws-o9-TZ1CPtmhxuU52RmGQ.png On a side note, as a certified misogynist I do cannot endorse TRP. Too much "Okay women suck, but they don't really suck, they're just different, see, and to you it seems like they suck, but they reeeeeeeally don't, ok? Anyone who says so is just in anger phase. pls no ban pls" hamstering.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 04:18 AM
3

2000 years is basically nothing evolutionary-wise.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 08:15 PM
0

No need to grasp for that, they're literally throwing themselves at you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 05:03 PM
-1

And here comes the obligatory grasping for female scientists.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 02:55 AM
2

Free will doesn't exist Makes for a mildly interesting philosophical debate, but is worthless as a basis for any actual argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 02:52 AM
1

Is drinking from Fountain of Youth ever a bad idea?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 02:50 AM
2

Incelligence, as it were
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 04:30 AM
3

something something motherly instinct
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 04:30 AM
2

If you think that the emotional aspect of a man’s sexuality can overcome the visual aspect as well as his biological imperative, doesn’t this require believing in a bluepy view of love? Long-term love that you speak of is nothing but attachment. Just like you love(are attached to) your parents or siblings, even though you don't find them attractive. Or you love(are attached to) your pet. Or that one coat. I don't think this goes against Red Pill theory. Especially when you consider that to even …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 04:27 AM
3

You cannot understand bailey and motte fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 09:29 PM
1

The simple fact that this model assumes that "everyone is a winner" makes me very skeptical of it. And even if it does work... it's useless. Let's say RP works on 50% of women. So by following RP you have 50% chance of success. By following this model you have a base 1/16, or 6.25% chance of success. Unless, of course, you want to start every courtship with "What Big 16 model are you?". Good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 09:09 PM
2

You have to feel the situation out "Be psychic" is not a valid relationship advice for those of us who aren't psychic. And most of us aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 09:07 PM
2

Dodging the question does not address it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 05:07 PM
1

Many people have a hard time even imagining a man being assaulted by a woman. Either they call him a pussy, say he deserved it, or laugh it off. As they should. Losers who can't defend themselves from people physically weaker than them are not the problem. The problem is that if they do defend themselves, they go to jail and not the attacker.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 04:27 AM
2

OP literally says "Men are just tools for women" "You're scapegoating women again!" Congratulations, you've reached a point where what you say is indistinguishable from tumblr feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 04:18 AM
5

Are we really doing this? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 04:16 AM
3

your you're All opinions discarded
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 04:15 AM
1

this thread is an eye-opener. i don't know why i have wasted time debating social dynamics with people that have conditions that can cause them to be socially inept in the first place (anxiety, depression, etc) Most of them seem to be blues though...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 05:10 PM
1

Would you honestly rather have men be suddenly require to wear nipple coverings than allow women to go topless if they want? I would prefer a shirt, actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 05:08 PM
1

My problem basically comes down to the fact that I don't give enough of a fuck about a lot of shit. I fail to see how that is a problem
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 05:07 PM
2

Nickname checks out...?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 05:06 PM
1

Life is not equally hard for everybody, the "Bad guy" is far from imaginary, and wasn't the official TBP narrative that terpers are complete idiots to let themselves be misled by "completely obvious lies that we all figured out by 9th grade"? Oh, and inability to understand arguments by comparison is a certified sign of low intelligence. You're now on the list.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 04:52 AM
4

Even if a woman doesn't view their breasts as innately sexual objects, and seeks relief from a heat-wave, they'd still be operating outside the law, whereas a man can show off his nips with no repercussions. In any situation where a man would be able to "show off his nips" with no repercussions, a woman would be able to wear a bikini top with no repercussions. I somehow doubt there is any noticeable difference in heat exchange between a naked pair of breasts and one covered by a bikini. Besides,…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 04:46 AM
1

Shouldn't they be? That doesn't even address the question. Everyone is "special" just based on the fact that they're occupying their own specific area in space, and their perspective is different from the schmuck standing to the left. Except a) 80% of people are not that different from one another, and b) when people spout out the "everyone is special" nonsense they are implying that this is some sort of an advantage, when in reality more often than not the opposite is true. I dare you, go to a …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 04:33 AM
1

To you it's "victimized mentality", to me it's simply explaining how we got where we are. I mean, if I said that United States was founded largely by colonists escaping religious, economical, etc. persecution in Europe, that also could be called "victimized mentality". By someone who had an agenda of blindly hating Americans.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 04:21 AM
3

Guys who are successful with women treat them like people. [citation needed] Also clarification as to what "to treat someone like people" means. Or not. You're just spewing out trite bullshit, after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 08:36 PM
1

What makes a man become a feminist? Leftism. The secular religion of 21st century.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 08:31 PM
4

Women had to start a political movement and advocate for themselves. So did men. It's called MRA. People cared for one, but not for the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 08:24 PM
1

Standard ManTM
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 03:49 AM
1

Right. So find me some TRP advice that doesn't suggest moving the fuck on with your life, then.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 03:45 AM
1

I am going to use one example as to why this list is - if not complete bullshit, then at least completely useless. (Granted, this could probably be said about the entire field of psychology) Love molecule (oxytocin) Over 6000 websites have dubbed the hormone oxytocin the “love molecule” (e.g., Morse, 2011). Others have named it the “trust molecule” (Dvorsky, 2012), “cuddle hormone” (Griffiths, 2014), or “moral molecule” (Zak, 2013). Nevertheless, data derived from controlled studies imply that a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 03:40 AM
1

I'm off the opinion that alphas can do whatever the fuck they want A statement that is completely nonsensical. "Doing whatever the fuck you want" is pure hedonism, which is simply unsustainable for anyone(even if you're a filthy rich and extremely well connected fuck, one day you'll be high on meth and decide to fuck the pastor at the height of his sermon and you won't get out of that one).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 03:22 AM
1

train yourself to be attracted to If you're going to attempt to completely rewrite your psychology, might as well learn lucid dreaming and date your literally dream girlfriend. Less maintenance and more free time that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 03:15 AM
1

Well I don't want to say all. Just like, 90%
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 03:14 AM
1

Die In A Fire
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 03:13 AM
2

Ah, short-sighted hedonism. What could possibly go wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 03:09 AM
2

Why are there so few cuckolds? The authors speculate that women may be remaining faithful due to "anti-cuckoldry tactics, such as male sexual jealousy, religious practices that regulate female sexuality, and strongly negative reactions towards female adultery." Well good thing we've done away with all this oppression in the 21st century
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 03:08 AM
1

There actually exists a good correlation between not understanding percentages and capability for writing trite platitudes
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 03:05 AM
1

Which is same thing, unless you're desperately trying to defend an impossible point of view.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 08:02 PM
3

No "They can be" they fucking are. Sure there are exceptions but you can't disregard the entire field of fucking statistics just because of some exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 05:23 PM
0

Asked to plot themselves on a 'sexuality scale', 23% of British people choose something other than 100% heterosexual You can smell the desperation from the lead-in alone
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 04:58 AM
3

unfair stereotyping of bisexual people (and gay men) as being promiscuous Gay men are promiscuous as fuck, for obvious reasons(high male libido without the "brakes" of much lower female libido). What are you smoking?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 04:54 AM
2

Most ladyboys look like men in drag. Let's not romanticize here.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 04:49 AM
0

Considering the lack of link, it might be one of those "I heard about it from a friend" kind of polls
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 04:48 AM
1

I don't remember the specific study, but some quick googling returns for example this: http://www.jpsychores.com/article/S0022-3999(05)00394-6/abstract?cc=y= The prevalence of tattooing and that of body piercing in the general German population are 8.5% and 6.5%, respectively. Individuals aged between 14 and 24 years display the highest rate of body piercings or tattoos (females, 41%; males, 27%). Within the group of individuals aged between 14 and 44 years, unemployment and nonaffiliation to a …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 04:32 AM
1

Irrelevant. Blues are fundamentally incapable of comprehending Red Pill ideas. Any Red Pill, not just The. Pointing them to the theory, threads, discussion, rants, etc. is a waste of time. Might as well try to argue atheism with a fundamental Christian.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 12:48 AM
1

I know, I know, AWALT but how can women have different social and cultural backgrounds, life experiences, dating prospects, tastes, life goals, relationship goals, etc. but all end up wanting the same thing in men? I dunno, how can every banana have different DNA, grow up on a different continent, on a different farm, on a different tree, under different atmospheric conditions, and yet when you go to a supermarket and buy bananas you do so because you know they will taste like you expect them to…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 12:44 AM
1

Tattoos are a sign of irresponsibility and short-sightedness. And general low-quality. There was actually some research about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 12:35 AM
1

Interesting question. I guess at most you could say it was a petty thing to do. That is of course assuming he would actually stop and help if it was a complete stranger.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 12:34 AM
1

They can't cope like normal people with the harshness of the world and move the fuck on with their lives so they form communities that submerge themselves into the thick of the drama where they can maintain their victim mentality and self-righteous sense of survival and perseverance in spite of their imagined prosecution. If you look at basic TRP tenets and see anything but "moving the fuck on with your life" then I don't even know what you say to you
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 05:21 PM
2

TRP "perceived problem" is that the current relationship market is 100% skewed in favor of women, and if you dare to voice a complaint you're a misogynist asshole(or a virgin loser, depends on the context) That's the injustice I'm talking about, not some "shitty women".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 05:17 PM
0

Is this some kind of sarcastic joke How can a bloop such as you talk about groupthink and group norms and socialization when you're the biggest victim of it
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 04:49 AM
2

Barely.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 04:47 AM
1

It is the blatent sexism and occasional misogyny that sets red pill assholes into a different league. So... are they assholes or are they asshole-posers? Make up your mind. My question is; why the hate? Anger is a natural human reaction to injustice, at least when it happens to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 03:56 AM
1

Bluepiller talking about how smart and restistant to societal brainwashing he is This is it, we have reached the Twilight Zone
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 03:53 AM
0

Besides, it's really the worst Omega men who seem obsessed with whining about the subject - they can't stand seeing a female character who isn't designed to target their dicks. It's times like these that your nickname is very useful You're like "haha what the fuck is that guy for real? ...oh"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 03:39 AM
5

Men 10 - women 8-10 Man 9 - women 6-7 So these are harems? Man 1-5 - women 1-2 And reverse harems?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 05:05 PM
3

That does not make logical sense. If you assume that every woman was getting married to a less attractive man, where does that leave the most attractive men? On a 1 to 10 looks scale: Man 10 - ? Man 9 - ? Man 8 - Woman 10 Man 7 - Woman 9 Man 6 - Woman 8 Man 5 - Woman 7 Man 4 - Woman 6 Man 3 - Woman 5 Man 2 - Woman 4 Man 1 - Woman 3 ? - Woman 2 ? - Woman 1 (This flailing about how oppressive and horrible equal marriage is is hilarious though. Been a while since I've seen someone suggest it seriou…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 04:44 AM
6

In the past men had mobility, as long as they had a good job or some kind of provider income, despite their looks...they could still get a good looking woman. So all the average and bad looking women in the past didn't get married?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 03:40 AM
2

2/2 is 100%
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 03:05 AM
1

So far 100% of blues think that blocking people that disagree with them solves all problems. How telling. The difference between reds and blues, right here
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 12:46 AM
2

I think giving individual users more control over their reddit experience is a good thing. WTF is "Reddit experience"? Either way, it's a horrible thing for a Mature Discussion SubTM that PPD aspires to be
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 09:57 PM
1

Well shit, I'll give you the first two links at least. Time to throw everything out of the fucking window. One step forward, two steps back.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 05:11 PM
1

I am so fucking tired of arguing with this unsubstantiated, baseless bloop drivel. Okay, show me. Give me something - anything - a statistic, a reason, a thesis why did human mating preferences suddenly change in 21st century.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 04:41 AM
0

We also see people shooting up schools.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 04:26 AM
5

No, they really aren't. You can't override biological conditioning with some half-assed propaganda.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 04:16 AM
-1

Well, acting feminine is also a thing. But it kind of goes without saying. Or it did go without saying before feminism ruined everything, at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 04:09 AM
3

I honestly don't know anyone can answer that question with any amount of certainty. The one thing we can say for sure about female sexuality is that no one knows for sure how it works. I've seen plenty of evidence for the "Trinity" model(Looks/Status/Personality) where almost any man can become attractive if he tries hard enough. I've also seen plenty of evidence for just-the-looks model, where hot guys are forgiven even if they are total assholes or total doormats. And I've certainly seen evide…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 03:58 AM
0

I worry for your future
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 03:52 AM
2

Every goddamn time
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 03:50 AM
1

Paying for hookers all the time gets fucking expensive quick It's not about "emotional validation from women", it's about feeling of not being a fucking loser who can't even get a girl. Obviously this is not a want you can satisfy with hookers
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 03:48 AM
1

The word "homophobic" triggers me, as it is not a phobia
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 02:08 AM
3

I'm fairly certain men enjoy when their penis is stimulated. Whether or not another person is enjoying stimulating their penis is irrelevant. Hell, some men can enjoy stimulating their own penis all on their own. Crazy shit, I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 01:19 AM
1

Explain the joke to me, because I'm not getting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 01:16 AM
3

he sounds like the kind of guy that would make his partner feel like a piece of shit that only he could love So, the standard operating procedure of most women in relationship with non-TRP men? The only difference here is that TRP men are doing it consciously.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 01:15 AM
4

Hate is never baseless. You don't hate things for no reason. The fact that you don't even know this shows how indoctrinated you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 07:31 PM
9

>Call others indoctrinated >Get Offended when called back
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 07:15 PM
9

The only indoctrinated person here is you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 06:23 PM
1

A "bf or a crush" can still be a shitty pick. What kind of argument is this, lel. I think you're being a little solipsistic Do you even know what this word means, or has it just become a generic PPD insult
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 06:22 PM
2

And even still... never hear of this before TRP/manosphere. So what is your point? That you were not taught the pair bonding effects of oxytocin in a biology class? Women enjoy sensuality and intimacy and even physical intimacy, but this bond doesn't seem to be centralized around sex as it does for men. I gave you my sources. Now you give me yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 06:14 PM
12

Reddit doesn't have "anti-hate-sub" policy, Reddit has "protect-own-image-and-business" policy. A dead sub on the forgotten fringe is irrelevant to that policy. That's how /r/jailbait got deleted, while /r/cutefemalecorpses is still here.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 06:06 PM
1

I've only ever heard of this intense magical pair bonding via sex in the manosphere or from men in general. Well it's not like there are female scientists to do all this research. https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=pl&q=oxytocin%20pair%20bonding
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 06:05 PM
0

Whoa whoa man. Even I would never go below 13, and I'm a self-proclaimed moral degenerate.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 06:02 PM
2

What a waste of a thread. Of course everyone will say they would be sympathetic. That's like asking people blankedly "Would you help someone in need?", what answers do you think you'll get? And then, how often do you think the staggering majority who said "yes" donates to charity? Or tosses beggars a coin?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 06:01 PM
4

Not when you're desperate to argue
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 05:59 PM
12

I veto on the grounds of it being 100% fluff with zero substance.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 05:58 PM
3

UNSTOPPABLE
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 05:56 PM
1

All living things are biologically hardwired to reproduce. That is pretty much the definition of life: wants to reproduce. "Having family" is a by-product of that drive among humans. So I don't really know what point you're trying to make here?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 05:53 PM
2

Holy shit the responses in this thread are pure bloop gold. "Oh well we just met and he kind of put penis in my vagina. Don't even remember his name. Also I was drunk at a time. So it wasn't really magical/memorable/important." No shit! Maybe if you put even the most minimal amount of effort into losing your virginity with someone you actually give half a fuck about it'd be better?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 05:47 PM
2

I remember research stating that losing virginity is usually a positive experience for men and a negative one for women, even resulting in drop of self-esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 05:45 PM
2

I have always said that this "pair bonding" / "limerence" effect TRP espouses is male solipsism of the highest order. ...because woman's first time is bad? You do realize that only happens once by definition, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 05:44 PM
1

Many of the teenage girls that are riding the CC are doing it merely as a form of rebellion against their prude parents. What prude parents?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 05:41 PM
9

The newest post is from two months ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 05:40 PM
3

I don't think Hanlon's Razor is that much more beneficial to you? You know, since that basically means most women are as functionally retarded as the worst of TRP posters always claimed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 12:32 PM
1

Give up Red-pillers - or start plotting a military coup - you'll never win the war of words with women. I'm fairly certain that "never argue, just state your piece and leave" is somewhere in there in TRP tenets.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 12:30 PM
1

But many men can't open up emotionally to other men, let alone cuddle with them. Men generally don't want to open up emotionally to anyone and they especially don't want to "cuddle". What the fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 03:26 AM
1

Then there was The Little Mermaid who chased the guy, Strong Independent Jasmine, that gypsy chick, that asian chick who pretended to be a man, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 02:51 AM
2

CHECKMATE, BLUEPILLERS STATISTICS DON'T LIE
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 02:09 AM
1

We must have watched different Disney classics.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 02:09 AM
2

Now, you can fuck a woman with with out giving away your commitment. If you're the top 20%
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 02:07 AM
1

You are literally unfit to be here if you think that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 02:03 AM
1

I think RPers suffer from confirmation bias. And blues don't?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 02:00 AM
3

There is absolutely no reason for a man to be in a relationship with a woman when no sex is involved. If you just want a "friend", you're much better off with one of your own gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 01:59 AM
0

Whoa, what a dick
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 01:56 AM
2

You would have to first estabilish that these "popularities" exist. As for the kick-ass woman, that's very simple: if you want a female main character, she's not going to be a princess sitting in a castle waiting for a prince to come rescue her. That would make for a fucking boring movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 01:55 AM
1

Humans aren't the only animals without a mating season.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 05:05 PM
0

You spent few hundred words trying to hamster "yes, humans have a mechanism for mate selection" and "but still, NAMALT/NAWALT" together. Since these two are mutually exclusive, I fixed your answer for you based on your bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 03:45 AM
0

I hope you don't think this supports your point, because it doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 03:44 AM
0

So that's a "no, humans are the only species on Earth that did not evolve a mechanism for mate selection" then.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 03:30 AM
2

Does it even matter "what"? The point is that, if you agree that humans evolved mechanics for mate selection, almost all of them(except outlier exceptions) will exhibit them. Just like how humans evolved opposable thumbs, and therefore almost all humans exhibit opposable thumbs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 03:03 AM
2

So you agree with AWALT?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 02:36 AM
2

Wow! So mechanism for mate selection varies just buy GDP of the country you live in? That's some outstanding adaptability. You should submit that to Nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 02:36 AM
1

So, she must be 80% of the population?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 01:33 AM
3

It is staggering how retarded your line of thought is. Haven't seen such try-hard grasping in PPD in months. But are they really hard truths? One thing almost all RP truths have in common is the shifting away of blame. No. It is not your fault she left you, women are hypergamous bitches What would you rather be true: That love is this magical, special thing where two soul-mates meet and are perfect to each other no matter who they are(because "everyone is an unique snowflake" and all women have …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 01:30 AM
2

This is the worst, most grasping, least thought-out topic in a while. It is also the most upvoted topic in a while. I guess the pendulum swinged back to BP side population-wise
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 01:12 AM
7

why isn't there a word to shame guys for having sex? Because it takes some sort of quality for a man to have sex. Maybe he's really good looking. Or really rich. Or is a singer/guitarist in a rock band. Or he is a master sociopath game manipulator 5000. Any of these is a "quality" trait. For a woman to have sex, basically all she needs is a vagina. This is not only not noteworthy in the slightest, it's basically just indulging on her part. "Whenever I wanted to have sex, I found a random dude an…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 01:09 AM
3

Who would spew out such hopelessly naiv- oh. Flair
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 12:32 AM
-1

It's amazing how one can dissect a post paragraph by paragraph then deliberately miss the one that contains the actual point. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 05:29 PM
1

Your argument reminds me of the "Only criminals ought to be worried about mass surveillance" one. If you don't want for government to read your emails and see your browsing history and listen to your phone calls... then obviously it is because you have something to hide, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 03:29 AM
1

Are those other people definitely wrong? Are they sowing the seeds of their own unhappiness? Oh no, ignorance is happiness. We don't do that Red Pill this-is-reality-and-it-sucks-balls stuff to be happy, but because uh... damn I swear I had something for this...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 03:28 AM
2

Seriously that whole post you just linked, it's pure emotion. No logic or argument. Feels. This is pathetic moralfaggotry. No, it's the opposite. Did you even read the body of the post?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 03:23 AM
3

Did you even read the body of the post?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 03:21 AM
8

I was not entertained
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 03:19 AM
2

I see this sentiment reflected elsewhere. Like when a woman in an office environment cuts her hair and even the most casual of male work acquaintances will make a negative comment to her about it, as though his opinion on her hair has any bearing at all. Or she gets a tattoo. Or gains weight. If it has no bearing at all, why does it bother you so much?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 08:15 AM
2

Not the way you described her, no
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 08:13 AM
2

It doesn't matter how you phrase it, it's still transparent and awkward as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 04:56 AM
2

If yes, then what would be your advice to such guys aside from paying directly for sex? VR porn?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 04:20 AM
2

Tell her that I only need to support her as a parent until she's 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 04:19 AM
2

Or sell pot.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 04:05 PM
4

Interestingly, it has fared quite well in terms of votes, and is the top post on CMV right now. I don't even know what upvoting in CMV is supposed to mean. "I support OP's point of view"? "I want to see this challenged"? "LOL dis gun be gud"? Then again the very nature of CMV is nonsensical... after all you are supposed to come there with a mindset of wanting your view to be changed. Top tier level of discussion brah.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 07:52 AM
0

They are inferior, and yet despite that the world rotates around them, and yet despite that they claim to be oppressed/underprivileged. They're like an employee who was hired just because they're the boss' nephew, who can't do anything and does not want to learn how to do anything, yet bitches all the time about how much his work "sucks". How could I not hate them?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 07:42 AM
8

This is not a CMV
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 07:31 AM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 03:04 AM
1

"Not getting pussy" for an normal male means a life of misery. So yeah, I'd say it's a bad thing - for said male. I don't even know what morality has to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 03:03 AM
1

It's amazing how you can say that being a nerd means you'll never get a girl ever and then say it's "not a bad thing".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 10:07 PM
2

Boobs on back and groping her thighs!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 10:04 PM
1

They aren't "forced" lol, it's just easier that way. If I could marry someone and get half their money and my only obligation would be a starfish sex once a month(if even that) shit, I'd probably do it myself
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 01:21 AM
1

and men control access to commitment They don't, not since women can hold jobs. It doesn't matter for a woman if a man is "commited" or not. Even in the context of raising children, she can be a single mother and get benefits and alimony.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 01:07 AM
1

Yes, men create a huge demand for sex. And who controls the supply of sex? Women. Now women also have a demand for sex, but that demand is far, far lower than that of men. That's why there are a thousand female prostitues for every male one. Therefore, women control the sex market. Because they have a monopoly on something that is in huge demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 11:38 PM
1

Now ain't that some unicorn shit
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 10:37 PM
3

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a2/Salt_mine_0096.jpg P.S. people worried about other people worried over other people's sexual history are creepy
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 10:28 PM
1

AF/BB works on micro and macro scale. On micro scale it's simultaneous, that is a woman marries a beta and then just cheats on him behind his back. Now TRP would say that this is done deliberately as part of some mating strategy, but it's far more likely she simply confuses affection with attraction, marries a beta but is not attracted to him in the slightest, the marriage becomes sexless so she then gets that sex elsewhere, from the A. Or she just divorces him, creating another divorce rape hor…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 10:25 PM
1

I don't know what this means. I mean they should link(default blue color) to sources
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 06:23 PM
1

The problem is, your entire post seems to operate on a problematic assumption: that the dominant partner always gets what they personally want, when in reality, the happiest and most balanced relationships (whether it's largely one person in charge, or a constant shift), often include instances of generosity and selflessness. Yeah you'll want to blue some of these words.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 05:00 AM
2

It's an interesting comparison, but not because Trump "commands respect", but because there is a large group of people ready to vote for Trump just to spite the leftists. People have been so fed up with their pretty lies and bullshit and censorship of anything that isn't pretty lies or bullshit that they are willing to go with anything as an alternative, even if it's a bigotry bomb. I am sure you could find such demographic among TRP supporters as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 03:30 AM
2

Why have the flair at all then? It's not obligatory.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 07:57 PM
1

That doesn't even answer the question
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 06:11 PM
4

women are continually contributing more and more to the "world running." I would laugh in your face but, you know Internet
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 06:10 PM
2

So what you're saying is that anyone nice is actually an asshole?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 05:28 AM
3

I think women shame sluts because they don't want to be accused of being sluts themselves. Which could happen if they just said "yeah she sleeps around. She's an independent woman"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 05:26 AM
0

If men are dependent on women in relationships, and women are not dependent on men, where does that leave us?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 04:57 AM
1

A strong woman who can support herself didn't select you for your providership qualities in the first place That's like saying ugly men do not care how women look.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 12:14 AM
1

This has nothing to do with your original point, and frankly it sounds you would only be satisfied if the Terpers on PPD abandoned their ~misguided ways~.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 10:50 PM
1

Rather than looking at everything that supports your beliefs, you look at everything that doesn't. This is absolutely necessary to be rational. TRP doesn't do this. Terpers on /r/purplepilldebate do this dozens of times, every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 10:07 PM
4

Disgust for weak men isn't a social construct, it's ingrained. And that is all well too, because being emotional is counterproductive. We can allow women to not be productive because other than reproduction the're relatively useless. We cannot allow men to not be productive because they quite literally keep the world running.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 10:06 PM
2

Au contraire, a "strong woman who can support herself" will be the first to leave you because she has even less of a reason to stay.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 10:04 PM
0

Not "low-libido woman", a normal woman, because it's normal for a woman to have lower libido than the man. And because of this, whenever she wants to have sex, the man will readily jump on the chance, fulfilling her "dream" of having sex whenever she wants. It really isn't that fucking hard?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 09:53 PM
1

Yes, because females have "moods" much more rarely than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 09:45 PM
1

A stupendously easy dream to achieve, if you're female.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 09:07 PM
1

Wow I feel so motivated now that I know I am at the level of a house pet
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 08:57 PM
1

There will never be harems you speak of. With males being naturally polygamous, and females being naturally hypergamous, harem is the natural state of male-female relationships. Monogamy was a result of economical necessity. Now that we have no such necessity, there is no reason why the humanity wouldn't revert back to its "optimal configuration".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 08:19 PM
1

Men fucked up by advancing technology so that we don't need your protection. We can use a gun or rely on the police force. This has nothing to do with technology. We went over two world wars without women having most of their current rights. And police force only upholds the estabilished rights; if women have no rights, they will not be protected. Or for modern example, just look at Arab countries. They don't lack in weapons or technology, yet women have little rights there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 08:17 PM
1

Tell me about the multiple answers to the "I have to eat to live" problem
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 08:03 PM
2

I don't think it's about that on a societal scale, but they certainly wax poetic about "better times" where women couldn't choose their mate, and men had access to whatever women they earned. Yep. That's totally how it worked. Women were put up on auctions and the men with most money simply picked some. There was absolutely no concept of dating or courtship, the woman had no right to refuse marriage, and above all else the parents had absolutely nothing to say about it. And of course the institu…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 05:18 AM
3

Some damn fine jailbait ITT if nothing else
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 05:11 AM
4

Did you think this was some kind of gotcha? Aren't all "Question for *Pill" threads attempts at gotcha?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 12:08 AM
1

So basically, you have no evidence for anything you're saying and you're just making it up as you go.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 12:07 AM
1

"hands on"? I'd say so
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 07:14 PM
1

You were married to several different women? wow
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 06:09 PM
2

Thanks. I'd prefer graphs but I bet scientists have better things to do. Maybe YouPorn will do an analysis on their statistics blog one day. It definitely feels like the amount of cuckold porn has been on the rise, though that has little to do with female hypergamy, more like with how modern society mass-manufactures betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 03:22 AM
1

Witness firsthand how? Via facebook status updates? Gossip? Their one-sided highly subjective "getting it off my chest"?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 03:14 AM
0

Attraction fizzles in and out. Guaranteed. I am sorry for your unhappy relationship. It's love that fizzles out sooner or later. That's just how it works. It's an evolutionary device to get people have children, not to keep them together for life. Literally hundreds of millions of people right now are in unrequited love they will get over sooner or later. Further hundreds of millions are in requited love they will get over sooner or later. Attraction is hardly permanent(you will look like a shri…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 03:10 AM
1

I don't think I've ever seen "smoke shaming" outside of Reddit's bleeding heart default subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:58 AM
2

Never underestimate the depth of female solipsism I mean, he wore a condom so it doesn't count anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:56 AM
3

The problem is that human "mating rituals" are heavily, heavily dictated by the social contexts in which they occur. Quite the opposite, actually. It's amazing how humans prefer the same general traits in their partners across vastly different cultures.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:54 AM
1

Have you grown as a person by observing the points presented by your ideological counterparts? I find the idea that only by "increasing my capacity for sympathy" I could potentially "grow as a person" amusing and fallacious
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:52 AM
10

This lifestyle has been growing in popularity. Just take a look at the explosion of hotwife/cuckold porn and homemade movies. I am going to need little more proof than none whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:51 AM
1

So much text and all of it is missing the point You said "mainstream and common sense" Go ask some IRL people about dating advice, and you'll get the general BP nonsense of "being yourself" and "people accepting you for who you are"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 08:45 PM
0

oh no, ad hominems I'm meeeeeeltiiiiiiiiiiiiing
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 06:10 PM
-2

you were so upset about it you had to post this, though? it doesn't really matter either way; why bother.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 05:55 AM
2

Then you have no point, because as the quote clearly states, women do find Chads more sexually attractive than Bodads. So yes, they will naturally wish they would be fucking Chad instead of a balding low management guy on the fat side.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 05:30 AM
1

Start with these in OP's post. Go ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 05:24 AM
2

Now replace "One night stand" with "sex" and re-read your post. Isn't this basically confirming AFBB?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 05:23 AM
1

It excises some pretty fundamental tenets of the TRP version, such as the belief that when women settle down with the stable dad-type, they trap him in a sexless marriage while probably fucking or at least wishing she could fuck Chad. "Girls prefer the muscular, handsome, charming guy for a one night stand or just fooling around, but go for the stable, secure, dad type for marriage. I mean, it's better to have lots of fun before you settle down." Literally what you are saying minus the last part…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 05:21 AM
1

Cool ad hominem bro sis
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 05:18 AM
0

I've made a pact that I would only have sex with a woman who (a) I care about, (b) cares about me and (c) has a great personality. Holy shit fedora alert
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 05:15 AM
-1

"I will ask a question about something that women lie to themselves about, and I'll get an honest answer because this is the anonymous Internet!" no no you won't
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 05:13 AM
3

No shit. If 20+ year old virgins didn't have issues, they wouldn't be 20+ year old virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 05:33 AM
1

Lift, get a "social" hobby, lose virginity with a hooker.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 05:32 AM
2

Believe it or not there are girls who even go for the shy, puppy dog type (as long as youre passably attractive). Ah, the classic "I cannot tell attraction apart from affection" mistake
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 05:31 AM
1

Attraction breeds jealousy, without attraction there is no relationship. If A = B = C then A = C.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 05:30 AM
1

That is one of the most vaguely bullshit things I've ever heard.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/16 07:20 PM
2

"Victim blaming" is virtually a legal concept. It means the criminal's guilt and sentence is not lessened by how "easy" the victim made the crime. As usual with everything, leftists took this perfectly reasonable concept and perverted it into some kind of "calling stupid people out on their stupidity is a crime".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/16 05:33 AM
1

~33%
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/16 05:29 AM
1

Nope
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/16 05:24 AM
2

If it looks feminine and acts feminine it could even be a full-blown male and I wouldn't particularly care.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 05:18 AM
2

Dude, Trump doesn't even lift.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 05:17 AM
2

Except if a woman gets "pumped and dumped" it's by her own choice. Here, let me explains how this works: Girl: Hey cutie, I have sex, want some sex? Boy: Damn straight I want some sex! Let's do this! Girl: Tee-hee, okay but we have to date first! Boy (Shit) Well, okay. Mission accomplished, commitment achieved.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 05:13 AM
1

I can also hammer a nail into my testicle.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 05:11 AM
1

female pickup artist and teaches men how to pick up women I don't even
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 06:00 PM
1

Oh sure I will totally admit to doing this thing that goes against the rules of the sub and will likely get me banned You clever devil OP, you!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 05:41 AM
2

Did you really just link to a feminist blog with the attitude that it is a proof of anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 05:40 AM
1

Nickname checks out.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 05:36 AM
1

Meh. Most movies/shows are written for both audiences, and generally feature loser-ish male and a cute girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 02:13 AM
1

Even when, in the far future, a robot that can replace a construction worker is created, it will be far too expensive to be economically viable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 06:47 PM
1

Thanks for proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 11:44 PM
3

What personally ticks me off is the "brave" people "fighting cancer". First of all, getting meds for your disease is not "brave" in any definition of the word. Second of all, you are not "fighting", you are literally getting shit pumped into you. It's not up to your will whether you live or die. But leftists need their emotionally-charged newspeak to simultaneously affirmate their own worldview and oppress any dissentants. Your "rape survivors" is just another example of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 08:00 PM
5

TRP is not "transphobic" so there is nothing to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 07:56 PM
4

Don't forget about those who just want to fuck with leftists, in any way possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 11:30 PM
2

I thought it was an interesting question. On MRP they really push for "caveman sex", where you are only interested in your own pleasure. With the caveat that being able to make a woman go crazy in bed is immensely pleasurable to the man. Egoism! It solves everything!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 06:51 PM
1

What do you think? I think a theory must have some backing up, otherwise it's just a random thought that popped into your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 06:47 PM
1

If that were true you would link them, instead of just talking about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 06:01 PM
7

Try what? People don't attempt change if they are satisfied with the situation they're in. It's that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 05:19 AM
6

Men stopped being the "gatekeepers of commitment" the instant women gained financial independence. Now both sides are "gatekeepers of commitment", equally.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 03:31 AM
3

It's not confident people who are attractive, it's attractive people who are confident. These two are not mutually exclusive. But if you actually assess human behaviour...the meme that confidence is attractive just doesn't stand up to any scrutiny. The only evidence anyone ever has to support it is anecdotal evidence, and there is always tonnes of anecdotal evidence to contradict it. Just like your post?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 03:28 AM
4

It's funny how this question only really "works" from female perspective. RP male/BP female: I see no problem here, the RP male wouldn't care much probably unless the BP woman had large n-count or something, but that has nothing to do with BP itself BP male/RP female - BP male has to accept anything the women do because they're all their own person or something, so again no problems Now if we take the women: BP woman/RP man - /r/purplepilldebate is pretty much this in action, no fucking way RP w…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 03:21 AM
4

It doesn't, I'm just correcting your blatant misinterpretation of what TRP is doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 07:46 PM
5

Getting arrested and going to jail is a bad sexual strategy. Some might say it's even bad life strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 07:17 PM
7

Let's take a controversial claim of TRP as an example; women respond favourably when you treat them like stupid, inferior brats. The assumption is that women like to be treated as dumb cunts, and that's why this works. No, the assumption is that women are attracted to "superior" men, and looking down at someone is considered a sign of superiority in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 07:16 PM
3

So discussion or making a point, which one is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 04:50 AM
4

So we should... basically just ignore this thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 04:47 AM
3

Why do you ask a question that you apparently already know the answer to?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 04:44 AM
6

Does, anything, like, really exist, man? Stoner reasoning, very useful when you want to avoid difficult questions you cannot give answers to because you backed yourself up into logical corner.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 04:43 AM
3

I was just waiting for the obligatory "BUT IT'S JUST DATING APPS! IRL IT'S TOTALLY DIFFERENT!" post.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 08:10 PM
1

PIV or PIA I wouldn't count blowjobs, myself, though of course one has to ask why he/she sucked off a hundred dudes
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 08:08 PM
2

Well, at least you agree with communism and socialism being signs of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 08:01 PM
2

47 :( betas gonna beta
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 07:57 PM
4

It's "hear hear"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 07:51 PM
1

If you would present it as the difference between her current SO and the New Guy, I could roll with it. I.e. NG is some kind of alpha unicorn, and her current SO is some kind of omega bitch, then cheat away.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 07:50 PM
-1

I really don't care
/r/MGTOW07/03/16 05:53 AM
1

Response # 3: These numbers need to be put in perspective. Meaning what...this doesn't matter...? Meaning what the fuck is your point here? If you are trying to prove that all men are terrible, you need to back it up with numbers. If you want to prove that women have it bad when rejecting, you have to back it up with numbers. Generally, if you want to prove anything, numbers a good fucking start.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 09:06 PM
1

Do you believe there has been a recent movement on the part of Facebook and Twitter to censor or favour one side of the argument? I think there has been not-so-recent movement on the part of every major company to avoid scandals and cover their ass. When you can get called a misogynist just by treating women equal to men, of course you are going to take the feminist side.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 06:53 PM
2

Post this on /r/foreveralone, rub it all in their face.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 06:51 PM
3

"Cognition comes through comparison" These numbers need to be put in perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 06:49 PM
3

C is for Challenge, not Change.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 01:56 AM
1

Because everything IT is done by betas, amirite
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 12:39 AM
2

For all those other genderfluid and non-binary people around that are still in the closet they are a huge source of inspiration and motivation. You still haven't shown how being "genderfluid" benefits society in any way. The huge societal pressure for boys to be masculine at all times is one of the biggest reasons for why men that aren't comfortable with their gender roles become depressed. Society doesn't benefit from non-masculine men, or at least benefits from them much less than they do from…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/16 07:13 PM
7

Well, if it's Japan we're talking about... remember, this is a country where saying "I'll think about it" means "no", "That would be difficult" means "Fuck no", and "Let's have a dinner together sometime" means "Nice to meet you". So who knows what literally asking someone out to eat would mean? Probably a quick bang in a love hotel?
/r/MGTOW05/03/16 05:43 AM
1

Deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 08:57 PM
2

Where is all this pressure from men to be "thin?" Who is saying this? Actually, research shows that being slim accounts for 70% of physical attractiveness in women. Obviously men won't say it out loud, because guess what, that's fucking social suicide. No no, I want a really intelligent girl you know? Someone I can just have long talks about different types of nuclear reactors with. That's my ideal
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 08:54 PM
3

Holy shit this is amazing. The power of liberal newspeak at work!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 05:50 AM
3

Damn, I can't argue with the "the dictionary says otherwise" point, so I will claim ALL DICTIONARIES ARE WRONG AND BIASED! You know, every year this whole SJW thing looks more and more like religion to me. You have to believe it blindly, because if not, you're an Evil person, and if you ask for proof, you will be pointed back to SJW movement. It relies on itself for proof! How do we know God exists? Bible tells us so.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 05:41 AM
1

I mean, are they wrong? So far, completely wrong. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/aug/17/technology-created-more-jobs-than-destroyed-140-years-data-census
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 01:03 AM
1

People have been saying that for literally hundred years now.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 12:56 AM
11

The outdated gender roles that causes the problem: men should be the major earners and women should stay at home and take care of the kids The provider/housekeeper doesn't "cause" the problem(because it does not exist anymore), it "caused" the problem. The alimony laws were made specifically to protect women who couldn't reliably find work in case of a divorce, back when men were the main providers in a household. So what is your point here? That now, when women can easily find work, we should a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 12:52 AM
10

I've met a guy once who was so straight he only masturbated to lesbian porn. While anally masturbating with a plastic cucumber, wrapped in a towel, with a condom on it. My random anecdotes are far more interesting than yours
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 09:49 PM
1

Very rarely. Most of them turn into docile sheep.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 09:41 PM
11

Ugly people are bad people. I mean that's just basic logic right?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 09:39 PM
2

So for instance: running in to a burning building or at a deranged shooter with the intent of helping strangers (especially women) avoid injury/death would be a traditional male gender role that definitely presents harm to that male. I am willing to bet ten bucks that no feminist ever used this as an example of "toxic masculinity".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 09:38 PM
7

Basically they play the part of the man by initiating and escalating sexually Also loving them unconditionally forever, even though they are boring beta losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 05:26 AM
3

What their subscribers really need is that feeling of belonging, a sense of community, being accepted, a sense of community, and that feeling of acceptance among a group of people. This beta bullshit is an anathema to pretty much everything RP advocates.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 05:23 AM
2

I think significant majority doesn't, yes [Edit]Also that story has nothing to do with n-count
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 03:26 AM
3

Sounds legit
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 03:20 AM
5

I'd say generic "male society" wants obeying women who think of themselves as weak and eye candy so the women don't question their treatment. And here I was, calling you out as a feminist after just one post. Am I good or what?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 02:18 AM
4

Is he harassing her? What? Sorry I've lost control of who is writing this story
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 02:11 AM
4

Yeah, but many times when a woman tells a man her n-count his behavior towards her changes. Because they don't want to date/marry someone with a high n-count. Wait, I'm getting a sense of deja vu here...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 01:59 AM
2

Basically, I have no fucking idea what you're talking about. You do realize that people don't have a giant N-COUNT: floating above their heads, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 01:28 AM
2

That's what girls are taught from a small age. Makes you wonder a) why, b) by whom, and c) why do they all eat it up
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 01:24 AM
2

If you're not dating/marrying the woman, why do you care about her n-count? Well, maybe I want to date/marry her.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 11:46 PM
1

I've been saying that for years well months, at least. The funny thing, the failure became so commonplace that people treat it as something completely ordinary now. It is normal to go through 3-6 failed relationships in your life. That's "just how it works", you have to "find your match".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 07:37 PM
2

I said they are concerned with looking like that as was seen in the post today that quoted a top mod. It's something they are concerned with to the point of a top mod having to state that they aren't rape supporters. You do realize that if it could be "proven" that they are, in fact, "rape supporters", the whole sub would be closed right? Most of Reddit would be delighted with that course of action. So if you cannot possibly believe that RPers are not, in fact, completely amoral, at least accept…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 03:57 AM
3

The majority of women do no divorce rape their husbands. In fact, if you marry a woman with a college degree, the probability of your marriage lasting 15+ years is around 80%. source When you consider that only a portion of the remaining 20% of divorces are initiated by women, and even a smaller portion of these divorces could qualify as 'divorce rape', we would have to conclude that this is behavior is not true for the majority of women. Why are you only considering the women with a college deg…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 03:54 AM
2

Why is TRP concerned with looking like "rape supporters?" I dunno, maybe because they are not, in fact, rape supporters, but people like you who like to jump to conclusions are ready to paint them as such just for acknowledging and understanding the sexual strategy? "Oh, so you say that the basic human nature is to eat? You goddamn cannibal!" - this argument in a nutshell.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 03:40 AM
2

Humans are pretty moral creatures, the idea of good v evil is as old as the first time homo sapiens walked the earth. [citation needed] The idea of murder can also be amoral, but nonetheless I will still go to jail if I kill someone. And yet, murders happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 03:13 AM
1

What does that even have to do with anything? Law is a social construct too. And follows closely the morality, actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 03:00 AM
1

Why not? Isn't it the cavemen stereotype, bang the woman upside the head with a club and drag her into your cave?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 02:52 AM
0

Not total redefinition, but when you look around at all the world’s cultures there is space for considerable variation. So... other than the one example you provided that goes against this point, do you have anything to support it?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 02:40 AM
1

If "sexual strategy is amoral" refers to knowledge about sexual strategy, then this claim is dubious, and if it refers to acts in service of sexual strategy, then it's straight up wrong. So have you considered the third and most fucking obvious, literal interpretation, which simply means that the sexual strategy itself is amoral? If we take beginning of homo sapiens sapiens as the point where their "sexual strategy" evolved, it predates oldes human civilizations by over two hundred thousand year…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 02:38 AM
3

You take an RP generalization, say it is false - without providing any proof - and then take your own generalization, say it is true - again without providing any proof. When I call you out on your double standard, you just bullshit me with "Well sometimes generalizations are true, and sometimes they are false, and it just so happens that the one that supports my point of view is true." Seriously, stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 02:32 AM
3

It is a convenient fact. Just like how, to prove if the Bible is true, all you need is the Bible. That is also a convenient fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 02:17 AM
4

How convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 01:51 AM
1

Your reasoning was only wrong because you suck at logic. That was the whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 09:36 PM
1

When pressed, most of the justification for RP beliefs rests on a collection of anecdotal evidence from the manosphere. It's a bunch of guys comparing notes on their experiences with women and then using this information to generalize certain traits about women as a whole. Yes. Scientific process often begins with an observation. Would it be fair to say that men in general turn into brats the moment they don't get what they want? No, because that would be a logical fallacy. Your observation was:…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 09:31 PM
5

More importantly, if RP generalizations are invalid, how come her generalizations are valid?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 09:27 PM
2

[citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 11:49 AM
3

Apparently none of what is debated on this sub comes from a place of logic or rational thought. Sounds pretty accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 07:05 AM
-15

Japanese men aren't "enlightened" they're omega male losers.
/r/MGTOW27/02/16 05:18 AM
3

Are you kidding? Sociopaths and narcissists are usually masters of social manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/16 05:06 AM
2

Some naive rpers have interpreted the infograph to mean that it's a regular occurrence for 36-year-old men to be hooking up with 23-year-old women. It's not impossible. It does happen, but it's not the norm. Bpers [rightfully] ridicule this idea. Anyone who has gone to college will tell you that it's far more common for 20-year-old women to be fucking around with early 20's men than it is for them to be hooking up with late 30s and 40s. There's also this. How's that for a 20 year old wall! (And …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 10:10 PM
6

Not only is this menaingless drivel, it doesn't even have anything to do with the topic of this thread. No wonder it's the most upvoted comment. How's that nazi moderation working out for you, PPD mods? Has the quality of discussion reached acceptable levels yet? Because I haven't noticed
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 07:31 PM
3

This should appeal to your sense of irony: The guy who really doesn't give a fuck is the one who can show the whole world how much he really cares about shit. "Sense of irony"? That's flat-out self-contradictory. Not that I disagree with the post itself, but starting it with a logical fallacy doesn't do it any favors.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 07:24 PM
6

Then being human is a generally unhealthy/bad thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 06:06 PM
10

No shit. But when the only cure for lack of something is that very something it's kind of hard to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 05:50 AM
10

Incel's problem is not as much lack of sex but general companionship. With women or anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 05:21 AM
4

OK, she is a comedian, but we live in an age where we increasingly don't take politicians seriously and take comedians seriously. See George Carlin. That's because a stand-up comedian is about the only person in the world who can tell shit like it is and not be called an -ist or -phobe. Because it's a "joke".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 08:50 PM
2

There's only two who I didn't get this from, but I won't name names. Pffft
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 08:31 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 08:29 PM
1

US version?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 04:21 AM
6

Introduction of anime into the western world has influenced our relationships with one another. Haha, okay, if that's your thesis - no. Just fucking no. If you even want to argue that media influence society, you have to start with mainstream. Anime is not mainstream in any way so it couldn't possibly influence anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 04:17 AM
0

A 5 woman can reject a 5 man simply because he’s “not her type”. And no, by type I don’t mean “not attractive enough” or that she believes she can realistically attract a 7 man sometime in the near future. I honestly mean he just doesn’t “do it for her”... But why? What is a type? How many are there? How can we qualify them? What are their relations between each other? Why would a woman even have a type? If none of these or similar questions entered your mind when you were writing that OP then i…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 04:13 AM
11

If we are influenced by our media... But above all else, media is a reflection of the society it's created in. Not the other way around. The gulf between western tropes and eastern tropes in media is huge. So anime might make lives of losers easier because it's created for them, but it would not be created if said losers didn't exist in the first place. Demand always follows supply. Also, I'm not entirely sure what point you are even trying to make here to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 04:08 AM
1

My issue is, I am successful in many ways on paper; smart, funny, charismatic...but we all know that is 0.001% of the attractiveness equation, the remaining percent which is made up by raw appearance. As a male? That is simply not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 07:50 PM
1

Attractiveness is linear, but SMV is a bell curve. Are you confusing the two? My question to you, is why do you believe in this model of dating and sexual dynamics? We apply scale to all things. Why do we measure temperature linearily?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 07:48 PM
4

Implying, for the entire history of humanity, we humans did not know how to human correctly. Isn't this pretty much literally what the whole idea of "progressivism" is about? That we started as savage brutes and only evolved - linearily and steadily - into the gentle civilized folk we are today?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 07:46 PM
3

I was being facetious, don't worry
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 06:13 PM
1

Needs "YOUR CONSEQUENCES" at the bottom.
/r/MGTOW23/02/16 05:57 AM
25

You are not "BBW". This is not something you decide yourself. You are fat.
/r/MGTOW23/02/16 05:56 AM
2

As a male who had his first crush in preschool, I can confirm that I was "mean" to the girl I liked. And should this really surprise you? What do kids do when they want to bring attention to themselves? Write fucking poems? That boys are mean to the girls they like is a fact. Whether you consider it acceptable or not is irrelevant and a completely different topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 05:52 AM
7

Why is it that the more and more gender equality we get, the more and more the women need to be protected? Mind boggles. Personally, at this point, I would suggest UK(and other countries with equally horrendous and widespread female abuse) to re-introduce gendered everything. Schools, mass transit, workplace if possible. I mean it's obvious that whatever campaigns they are trying are not working, and indeed the abuse is on the rise. You couldn't find statistics like "1 in 5 of women in UK was a …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 05:22 AM
6

Thank you for your completely illogical contribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 03:04 AM
7

Thank you for your completely trite and useless contribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 02:48 AM
2

Your rules are fucking retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 11:53 PM
1

Partially. It is a no-brainer that the more you do something the more easily it will be for you to do it in the future. This also applies to any "moral limits" humans have. Theft, assault, murder, cheating, etc. With that in mind, it's a scale... though the first time is probably the hardest and biggest hurdle. So if I had to only pick between yes and no, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 11:03 PM
1

Yes. Though not by much. Less crimes of jealousy and less dumb-ass teens ruining their life, that sort of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 10:59 PM
2

It's times like these that I am most happy that I subscribe to the "morality is relative" philosophy Also Ohayou PPDers! I'm watching you, weeb
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 01:01 PM
2

Oooh... so you sypathize with the woman? Interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 07:02 AM
1

Wait, you think cuckoldry is disgusting as a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 06:53 AM
3

Well, even if there's a correlation between being a cuckold and having serious self-esteem issues, will you admit that being a cuckold isn't what makes them a loser? Who cares, if every cuckold is also a loser by default?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 05:59 AM
5

I don't think you realize that you don't even have an argument here. Let's assume that okay, fetish-cuckolds are not losers. So what? The cuckolding TRP talks of is the "historical definition" kind. Not the "fetish" kind. So you are talking about something completely different. On a side note: yes, I think the fetish-cuckolds are losers, because you don't get into that kind of play without serious self-esteem issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 05:50 AM
1

how do you not come away from here without the pain you absorb being felt by those around you? You don't. What you learn will (hopefully) change you as a person and will affect every other person you interact with.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 05:47 AM
3

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cuckold Nowhere does it say that it is voluntary.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 05:36 AM
4

No. If anything, it helped me further divide people into two categories of "rationals" and "socials".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/16 11:29 PM
6

Or feminism long since outlived its original purpose and is now just "anything goes" And please, we all know why women use "you can't get laid"(and why men use "she gets laid a lot") as a weapon. Because to them that's the mark of a failure.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/16 08:08 PM
1

Another day, another "let's ask /r/purplepilldebate about things instead of just googling research on the subject" thread. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1634963/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/16 08:03 PM
5

The feminists trying to get rid of the "get laid to be a man" bullshit usually aren't the same as the feminists mocking men who chose to be virgins/men who are genuinely trying to do the right thing, but aren't ready for a sexual relationship yet. Makes you wonder how can there be so much schism in such a simple movement And what either of these has anything to do with empowerment of women
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/16 07:50 PM
3

No, that's the blue pill. Actually now that you made that comparison, it's actually scary how well it fits. Thnaks, I'll be stealing that for future use
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 07:30 PM
2

Controlling or coercive behaviour is primarily a form of violence against women and girls and is caused by female lack of agency. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 07:18 PM
3

This isn't how most of these relationships go. He usually starts out as a nice albeit cocky guy and eventually becomes an asshole over time once he feels he has finished his "conquest" of her. Do you have any data to back that up?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 07:17 PM
2

Everyone except for the employer for whom it is a gigantic legal turd and which makes them wary about hiring women. That's the point here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 07:11 PM
1

As with what most things that parents and babysitters tell their children, this makes no logical sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 10:53 PM
1

Well, you want my answer or "real" answer? Personally I'm a face guy. "Real" answer... well I'm sure there is a wikipedia page for that. Like "sexual attractiveness" or something that will list all the biological turn-ons.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 10:52 PM
2

I dunno man, it seems you are really stretching it here. The kind of "If you eat food you are a slave to yourself" kind of stretching.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 10:49 PM
2

To push my opinions on people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 03:33 AM
1

But personal IDs are fascism!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 11:50 PM
-1

Were male students aware of other students' GPA scores? Bcause if not, then it's just the case of men not caring about how smart the women are right?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 07:43 PM
7

From science and personal observation I arrived at the conclusion that anyone under the age of 25 is dumb. (Note: I am not 26)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 07:32 PM
2

But - again - this has nothing to do with wealth gap. Multi-millionaires exist in Sweden too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 05:08 AM
1

im curious why you refuse to say what country you in. I'm equally curious why you think it matters. Oh wait, you're blue, so you take personal experience and ~feels~ over readily available hard data. Also the one popping out the child should get extra leave as there is a recovery period. Sure. Just don't expect to be an attractive employee then.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 05:06 AM
2

What does supporting the poor have to do with wealth gap? I mean, unless you are leftist and believe the rich all suck the money out of the 99% like some kind of economic-vampires.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 04:31 AM
1

Also your link agrees with me. Technically, because your argument was that "men also get some leave". Of course, being blue, you're incapable of understanding basic logic that some numbers are larger than others. To you it's all just "number".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 04:30 AM
1

No one who works 40 hours a week should be struggling to make ends meet And why exactly 40 hours a week is the Universal Workweek Constant?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 04:00 AM
1

So, your argument against wealth gap is "because everyone should have the same amount of money"?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 03:50 AM
1

Most European countries have paid parental leave for both genders. Educate yourself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parental_leave#Europe_.28inc._Eastern_Europe_and_Central_Asia.29
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 03:24 AM
4

TRP seems to have an obsession with rich but unattractive men like Dan Bilzerian, Donald Trump, Hugh Hefner, etc. I don't particularly get it. These men aren't actually attractive Yes, you just said that. they're just rich enough that cute girls will agree to have sex with them in exchange for the money and lifestyle they provide. Which is the point. Physical attractiveness is only a third of what makes a male attractive. The other two are charisma and social standing(this includes wealth, becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 02:21 AM
2

Still don't understand how you get barely one week leave a year. Well, I still don't understand how I can get a full month of leave a year(plus all weekends and national holidays of course) in Europe. And I live and work in Europe. How women can demand to leave the workplace for half a year and then have their position back - and get it - is even more mindboggling to me. "You have to hire me, even though I will work less than my male counterpart, and pay me the same, but at any time I reserve th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 02:11 AM
0

Who the fuck cares? I mean, except leftists who think that everyone should have the same amount of money because... uh, they like even things I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 02:08 AM
0

I also heard of "cyberbullying". But that doesn't prove anything, because you can make up any shit you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 10:35 PM
-1

Explain to me what makes "bad women" go with "bad guys" Actually, first explain what is your definition of "bad" Actually, just GTFO with your leftism.
/r/MGTOW16/02/16 05:42 AM
0

No one past high school is a "bully". If you're an adult we use terms like "Assault"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 05:26 AM
2

It is always the man's fault, and I am saying this unironically/unsarcastically You know the world rules, boys(and if you don't, step it up)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 05:25 AM
7

Men are better than women. TRP, even if they actually thinks such, loves to obfuscate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 10:00 PM
2

Is the Red Pill damaging to men's mental and emotional health? All truth is in general
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 06:45 PM
7

Nickname checks out.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 05:45 AM
10

Why do you call it paranoia? And why do you assume your LTR won't cheat on you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 05:01 AM
6

Just because a couple 15 year old girls on the internet called you misogynist shouldn't make you feel like you can't talk about women. Sure, then you are called to your boss' office and find out that they "have to let you go" for "damaging the company(university, whatever)'s image".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 11:39 PM
5

Dunno, 50% divorce rate? 1/3(and rising) of all kids in America growing up with a single parent? Institutionalized sexism against men? Birth rates falling across almost all developed nations on the planet? I thought these were bad things? But if I'm wrong, do tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 11:35 PM
3

I will go with this premise if we agree that any woman can add +3 to their Apperance Score with makeup, hairstyle and clothes. So yes, men on the manosphere equate not being able to get even a 3/10 woman with being an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 11:26 PM
8

I am stable, nice and boring so the latter. Also, those tend to cheat less.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 11:24 PM
1

Yes, just watch Italian Spiderman for some examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 11:23 PM
1

Cool so basically what I said people forced into roles they didn't necessarily want ...ed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 11:30 PM
1

What is so dangerous about your line of thinking is if you see a guy who can't get girls you are going to assume he is lazy, no ambition or confidence , you don't know who he is. What other reasons could there be if he doesn't look like a horse? The 1/40 chance he's gay?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 11:02 PM
1

The problem in the past was that roles were so rigid many people hid their true selves. One man's "hid their true selves" is another man's "had no choice but to step up and man up"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 10:44 PM
4

No one said they are the final indicator. But you cannot honestly say that traditional beta traits - like agreeableness, submissiveness, lack of confidence, etc. are good traits to make a career out of? You won't get a raise if you don't ask for one, and you won't be promoted to a leader(which most mid-high paying jobs effectively are) if you are a follower. There is no logical reason why a beta would have a successful career. And if he's rich, that's just because he has nothing to spend money o…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 10:40 PM
2

somewhat large collection of people 10
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 09:59 PM
1

Respect is a feeling. It is a feeling that you feel under specific circumstances. You can't... you can't fucking tell someone to feel it without these circumstances. As with most "pretty" leftist catchphrases, this doesn't even make logical sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 02:36 AM
1

But can't a large dose of comfort and a small but still sufficient dose of desire still be the basis of a healthy, loving relationship Not for men, who generally want to have sex. When your wife is not attracted to you sex is pretty hard to get.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:08 PM
1

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/submissive Niceness absolutely falls under this category.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:06 PM
1

The less customers you have, the more important this becomes. So if the "customer base" is three billion, it's almost unimportant? Checks out. This is kind of a moot comparison anyway, because most customers have to be convinced to buy shit they don't really need, while drive towards reproduction is an absolutely base human instinct. There is no evolutionary predisposition towrads TN/IPS monitors.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:02 PM
1

I don't even know what that means.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 07:57 PM
0

You are so goddamn ignorant you don't even realize how ignorant you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 05:22 AM
6

I think you are confusing generic "contribution to society" factor with "who I would like to fuck" factor I mean Marie Curie? That's like 3/10, would not bang. Great job on that radioactivity thing though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 05:20 AM
0

gl hf
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 12:51 AM
2

How can we CMV something that apparently has no basis? I mean here's a CMV for you: I think jews did 9/11. /folds arms, sits back, waits for the C
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 12:50 AM
0

Why might or might not this be a good idea? For starters, the fenimists would destroy you
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 12:44 AM
3

I think women sleep around a lot because they can. I mean, it's like pirating music off the Internet. I never paid for music in my life. When I want an album, I just hit a torrent site and get it in 15 minutes for free. Why? Because I can and it has no consequences. Why wouldn't women do the same thing with sex? Leftists love to tell us sex is a wonderful, healthy fun thing that everyone should do, contraception is more easily available than food(you can get condoms for free as a teen no questio…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 12:42 AM
1

Nah I was kidding. But I bet someone, somewhere said that seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 06:29 PM
3

but most people think it's particularly heinous Isn't that just a patriarchy propaganda based on the male preference for virgins?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 05:21 AM
1

Well, I don't know if I can't get sex or affection, because I've never tried. But in my 30 years of life only one female expressed an interest in me, and she had a moustache. So I would probably have a hard time. At the very least, I would have to try very hard since, contrast to my red beliefs, my personality is typical beta. I wouldn't say it's "OK" since I'm ok with this, and it's not ok to be ok with never having sex or being in a relationship as a male. I mean... that's just not normal. But…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 01:23 AM
2

As someone who lives in Europe and who pulled 300+ hours last month(which is actually illegal), half of them as night shifts, I fart in your general direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 01:11 AM
1

Other than the sweatpants paragraph, which is directly related to physical unattractiveness, you are listing like... mental issues. Yes, I will make an exception in the rule for crazy people. Happy?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 06:12 PM
1

Isn't this pretty much what I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 06:08 PM
4

No one will ever take the MRA seriously because whining about your rights is an anathema to masculinity itself. Real menTM use action and force, not legal whine. They get what they want on their own, instead of relying/asking some higher agency. That's why even other men are embarassed around MRA.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 02:29 AM
19

Because you're a woman. Male love is largely unconditional. Which is to say it is conditional, but the conditions - your apperance - are pretty much set in stone. Unless you suddenly have a fatsplosion, if I love you at 20 I will most likely love you all the way up to 40(thank you, L'Oreal). And after 40 we're married with children, and my sex drive is less than half of what it was, and so is yours, and our relationship looks more and more like roommates than actual lovers, so none of that game …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 02:25 AM
0

Bad excuse is better than no excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 09:43 PM
1

The child analogy doesn't work because the child cannot have any power over adults by default. Women can. If they wanted to. There were "many" strong-willed women in history who broke the convention and became powerful. But significant majority of women don't want to, because as you said, they've been coddled their entire lives. Ironically, they want the power to be able to take what they want given to them on a silver platter(and even more ironically, most of the time they do get it! Like it ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 09:42 PM
1

If you agree with some or all of the above to some extent, do you then understand why some people don't think redpillers' collective body of personal experiences are a very reliable source of knowledge, even if posted in good faith? Sure, but I could say the same about BP "field reports"?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 05:39 AM
5

How else would you do it? Just two people appear in middle of an empty room and start fucking?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 05:35 AM
2

...is this some kind of joke? Or sarcasm? http://www.military.com/military-fitness/marine-corps-fitness-requirements/usmc-physical-fitness-test Even the physical fitness test requirements are different for each gender, becausewomen are physically inferior, and there are plenty of other reasons why they shouldn't serve, the chief of which is that they're too fucking valuable for the society/country to get them killed for literally no reason. As usual, the blue ignorance is nothing short of stagge…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 03:40 AM
0

Sooo anyone can put up any research papers or are we just "creating narratives" again?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 10:46 PM
1

Trump is an alpha?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 07:16 PM
1

No, I would not care to point out the issue with women serving to someone who does not already see it by default, as that means that someone is so fucking stupid and/or ignorant that he would not get the argument anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 04:59 PM
1

No, I am comparing two idiotic arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 04:57 PM
3

That's your argument? Since child labor exists in India, there is no reason to not employ children?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 05:56 AM
1

You really see no reason why women shouldn't be put in the military? Really? Not a single one crosses your mind?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 05:49 AM
1

Most of these beta men are not biological betas, they are middle-of-the-road, just told to act beta by the society as a whole. The actual biological betas are a minority, and... well, no one cares about them. Tough luck. Short straw in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 05:48 AM
1

Because it is based on make-believe lies.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 06:56 PM
2

Worse for who?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 06:55 PM
6

The end goal is a feminist-approved, egalitarian world I shudder at the thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 05:39 AM
4

I'm still waiting for them to explain how we're totally not at all like all the social animals that have sex with each other just for fun, and to keep the community together. Well, we are quite unlike dolphins.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 05:37 AM
2

Where do you consider yourself on Kohlberg's hierarchy of moral development? Standing next to it, pointing and laughing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 06:58 PM
0

Wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_effect 15 upvotes though! high_level_debate_sub.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 06:56 PM
2

The problem is when anger remains the primary motivator instead of getting past the anger and becoming motivated simply because you like who you are and want to improve. Why is that a problem? I don't hate women, and certainly don't hate my wife. I'm not angry at her or women in general, because it isn't their fault I fucked up, and it isn't their fault that reality is what it is. This again? So when your teenage daughter gets raped and murdered by some heroin junkie, you won't be angry about it…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 06:52 PM
2

Well that or I am forced to. But no one forces you to be in a relationship so...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 06:35 PM
2

So what, you're going continue a relationship that is not satisfying anymore because... it's a challenge?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 06:25 PM
2

Exactly. So when you don't want to be with each other anymore, why would you fight/try to be with each other?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 06:03 PM
1

Okay, then 90% of us are "damaged"?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 06:03 PM
1

When you are long past that honeymoon phase, you have to chose to want to be with each other Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 05:39 AM
1

Well, /r/foreveralone would disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 07:43 PM
1

Doesn't sound like something that depends on looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 07:31 PM
6

It's the societal standard for a reason Is it? News to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 07:03 PM
1

but you can't fake love. Weren't there some experiments where people who looked into each other's eyes and said "I love you" enough times actually ended up being attracted to one another? I'm lukewarm about helping ugly people get relationships, but let's not pretend love is some magic force binding soulmates or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 07:01 PM
1

I freely admit that I have no idea how an average man looks like. I can spot a quality man, and I can spot a loser, but I have no idea about averages. Also, man's quality comes from more than just his looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 06:52 PM
7

Just because you're "staying together for the kids" doesn't mean you're a dysfunctional family where the husband regularly beats the alcoholic wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 06:51 PM
2

but while things are changing I don't see what's collapsing 1/3 of children in US live with a single parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 06:50 PM
7

I don't know if you're implying that everyone is entitled to niceness or that everyone is nice by nature, but both are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 06:46 PM
0

Because not everything is about men? Why do you want it to be "about men" so bad? Because they actually enjoy working and contributing? Haha, sure. We just love doing boring, tedious shit for half a day, every day. Because almost everybody has to work these days, whether in LTRs/marriages or not, and often even when kids are involved? The point is, if you could not work and be supported by your partner instead, why would you work? Because even if their partner/husband has the ability to look aft…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 05:32 AM
-2

Women like shoes with heels. But just because its a high heel, doesn't mean she is going to like it. What is illogical about that line of reasoning? Are you for real?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 05:12 AM
-1

Women like men who have nice personalities. But just because you have a nice personality doesn't mean the woman will automatically like you. If you think being nice means women should automatically like you, than you don't have a nice personality. It's amazing how you can say something so self-contradictory and not even notice it. Well, at least that's how rest of us knows you're working with an invalid premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 04:46 AM
1

Aren't there any "homely girls" surrounded by nice guys? Can you prove that "nice guys" only go for 9/10 bimbos? Even if that's true(and it's not) what is even your point here? That men are attracted to attractive women? Wow, look at this, even the word attracted shares root with attractive, what a discovery. And finally, do you assume "homely girls" have somehow different standards from 9/10 bimbos and would be just fine with a nice guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 03:42 AM
6

That’s probably because you’ve not been on the other side where they’re trying to fuck you The nerve! and/or whining to you about how certain women should be willing to fuck them. If you tell a man that he will get girls by being a nice guy(and you do it all the time), then: a) he will act like a nice guy b) he will expect to get girls by doing so Maybe it works out differently in your female-brain-land where yes means yes and no means no and yes means no and no means yes and no means maybe and …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 02:46 AM
8

I mean it defies logical sense. Only thing that defies "logical sense" here is people like you who think men and women are identical.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 02:36 AM
1

Which is to say: It's going to limit a speakers ability to be happy in their relationships with audiences. Yes, TRP generally acknowledges that truth and reality suck ass. I don't know what your example is supposed to demonstrate, other than the fact you're a typical bloop who puts fee-fees over reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 08:18 PM
0

Why is it nonsense? Other than the childish "men and women are the same"?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 08:12 PM
2

Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 08:10 PM
2

They are wearing makeup though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 08:07 PM
17

So, basically, the argument is that we're all primitives, or animals, and nothing has changed in all this time we've had a civilization thing going. Yes. Nothing happened in the ~4000 years we had a civilization going, compared to our 250000+ years of evolution as homo sapiens. The fact that you consider this simple reasoning nonsensical is... well, laughable. and it requires us to ignore how like pairs off with like Do prove that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 08:05 PM
6

No shit. When he/she wants to have "guys/girls night out" then you're halfway through to "We should see other people" already.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 08:04 PM
1

If by "real world" you mean Asshole Land™ Yes, this is what he said.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 08:02 PM
2

Link directly to the papers or GTFO. In other words, it is reported that the better your relationship is the more your girlfriend is attracted to you, even during the most fertile phase of the month, in which case they are EVEN MORE attracted to you and not the "tall squared jaw hulk" Too bad you need to be a "tall squared jaw hulk" for her to be so attracted to you in the first place lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:06 AM
2

Women dress revealingly to make themselves look more attractive because uh, that one thing called attracting a partner. I hear it's all the rage in the animal kingdom. No idea where being insecure would come into play here, as someone who is insecure won't be drawing attention to themselves. You know, because they're insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 11:52 PM
3

Isn't that completely backwards? It's the conservatives that act in the interest of general society, not caring (much) about minorities and exceptions, and creating the "this is how everyone should act" line... while liberals are all running around with individuality and "everyone should do what they want" hard-ons.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 11:43 PM
1

Collection of best posts on a sub. It's on the right. I was asking mods, not you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 08:46 PM
2

Why is this not in the Deepthub yet?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 06:52 PM
0

Well, small statistic, but women who have Master's degrees or higher are the most likely to have stable marriages (something like 78% of such women do not divorce, and about 65% of men who are that educated). Education correlates with stable marriages generally. How does that go against TRP? Also, higher education = older, which fits The Wall theory. Also, most people aren't promiscuous, men nor women. Oh well, if you say so! Also most people who aren't asexual like sex, promiscuous women, non-p…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 03:07 AM
1

You can keep going after the orgasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:46 PM
1

...so you even openly admit how much more effective the vibrator is? And what stops you from just keeping on going?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:38 PM
1

It is the most enjoyable. And toys don't give you instant orgasms, they take you the whole way. Just like normal sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:23 PM
0

"Communication" is bullshit. If she has sex with him once a week, that's her attraction level. What would "communicating his needs" achieve here? She's not going to be more attracted to him because he said so.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:13 PM
2

Women are taught to say no when they mean yes because society says women who have sex are terrible. No, society says sluts are terrible. I mean the part you quoted literally says that and yet you somehow managed to twist it into your own agenda...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 07:51 PM
1

If she uses the toys to finish, she can also use them to start and ramp up. At that point what are you even there for?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 07:50 PM
11

Seems pretty scientific to me. Onion: TOMAHAWK OF TRUTH IN THE SKULL OF LIES
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 07:45 PM
3

The problem here is, these "merits" are largely biological. You won't hear a rags to riches story on the relationship market.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 05:42 AM
5

The three basic human - animal - needs are eating, fucking and sleeping. I don't think that when a male wants a girl he is "entitled". Not any more than he is "entitled" to not starve to death.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 05:41 AM
2

Generally when people say "good old days before Feminism" they mean 50s America, not 400BC middle east.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 05:38 AM
1

Ironic, isn't it
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 09:41 PM
2

Do people not do that love/crush thing anymore? Am I stuck in stone age of relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 07:42 PM
1

Appeal to morality Apex fallacy And of course the obligatory complete removal of female agency in a relationship "Girl in Blue" indeed
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 07:38 PM
0

Stop calling it a "burden", you sound like an tumblrina.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 07:35 PM
-1

Yeah, no. Sorry for the succinct answer; I'm not a leftist so I generally don't bother with the whole made-up-not-backed-up definitions and unquantifiables.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 03:28 AM
1

inherently harmful not healthy So do you have an actual argument here or did you took the wrong turn and think you're on tumblr?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 07:13 PM
2

26,000 unreported sexual assults in the military Wait a second - if they're unreported how do they know how much there are?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 07:11 PM
1

Long ago, someone posted a link to a research paper here. The tl;dr of it was that in any two people relationship of any type someone has to be the leader and someone has to be a follower, otherwise it quickly falls apart. Shit-tests are just a way of estabilishing who is the boss.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 07:09 PM
0

Throw "dislike" in there too
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 05:41 AM
1

Just one?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 06:45 PM
1

Never attribute to malice...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 06:45 PM
1

It's very darwinistic
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 06:43 PM
1

The question of nature vs. nurture is fallacious because nurture is a result of nature in the first place. Unless you want to assume that, at some point in the past, the men of Earth all got together(including those living on different continents not yet able to cross oceans) and decided that they will brainwash several generations of women into thinking a certain way, because... reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 05:23 AM
3

He has one anecdote. You don't even have an anectode, just yourself sitting in an armchair "speculating" about the "nature of TRP men". Really? You are going to call him out here?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 12:25 PM
2

Personality was scored higher than looks at a nearly 2:1 ratio. I was blown away because I was certainly expecting it to be the other way around. Well, it probably should be noted that by "personality" they probably meant "feminity", not being interesting person.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 01:20 PM
2

Useless leftist buzzword.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 01:18 PM
9

Well, not for men at least?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 05:21 PM
5

It's amusing how the very first link on Deepthhub is about how this sub is useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 05:05 PM
1

Most shit tests are not deliberate.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 03:49 PM
2

I reject RP's claim that there are so few attractive, marriage minded men around. Check the US obesity rates again.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 07:49 AM
2

Consider that 98% of people arrested for rape in 2008 were men (BJS dot gov) Yes. Consider 2% in light of OP's 75%. Do you understand how numbers work, little bloop? and as for oppression of women for 10,000 years, you don't need numbers Oh. You don't. Now stop trolling me. Go back to /r/thebluepill, obviously you can't handle world outside of safe-space echo chambers.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 10:58 AM
3

Not really. My misogynist male brain cannot comprehend the situation where you willingly stay in a situation that is hurting you despite half of the world being willing to help/assist you if you only ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 07:58 AM
1

Hahaha, no. But I got 99 problems and women ain't one.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 07:57 AM
2

A prime reason why you should take these "rapes" with a pinch of salt.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 07:54 AM
-2

I certainly wouldn't if they used exactly that term: "rape survivor". That has the stench of leftist "rape is worse/equal to death" all over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 07:53 AM
2

Let us know how that works out for you in the long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 07:53 AM
3

I predict 2016 to be the year that the red pill will go mainstream. Hah. Incels from /r9k/ will rise sooner than TRP becomes mainstream.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 07:51 AM
3

And not only in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 07:50 AM
3

OP gave numbers. You gave your feels.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 07:49 AM
1

Well, yes. If you go to /r/justiceleague you'll find a lot of post about injustices. Probably.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 03:39 PM
1

no
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 03:38 PM
1

Your mistake is assuming that "getting angry" and "improving your life" are mutually exclusive. I mean do you think all MGTOWs ever do is jam F5 on various MGTOW sites? Or type "why women suck" into Google?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 09:40 AM
1

Honestly though I think the /r/MGTOW sub and the other forums they have are just embarrassing and if you genuinely do "go your own way" you don't need to bitch about women online because you're too busy doing whatever it is you're doing with your life. That's like saying anyone who isn't in UNICEF has no reason reading/replying/posting/talking about news about poor living conditions of children in Africa. Women are shitty. And gynocentric first world is double shitty. Posting about how shitty it…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 09:28 AM
2

TRP still tries to have relationships. MGTOW doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 09:24 AM
2

She says she's autistic Aaand all relevancy goes out of the window.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 09:22 AM
1

When two women date, what does their relationship look like in your mind? Probably indistinguishable from two female good friends/roommates. When two men date, what does their relationship look like in your mind? Probably non-stop fucking. Also won't last long.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 09:15 AM
1

Masculinity is the traits generally biologically applicable to males. Feminity, I have no idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 09:13 AM
5

We totally don't want that. But we're not the only ones telling you to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 09:12 AM
1

A cohort born in 1958 is old data How would you get "modern" data then? Go 50 years into the future when current generation is old enough to provide it? And why would it even change with time? And do you realize that most IQ tests are made specifically so that both genders score equally?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 01:54 PM
1

Obviously it has its downsides for men ...what?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 09:11 AM
1

Isn't the pill supposed to lower sex drive? Isn't that why they would prefer betas?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 09:08 AM
2

that shit's coded in your dna over a few tens of thousands of years of evolution 220k for Homo Sapiens Sapiens alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 09:05 AM
1

Try /r/askgod if you're religious, /r/askbiology if you're not
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 09:05 AM
1

You now have the opposite sex brain/hormones but you're still basically the same person inside What a typically blue thing to say. The difference between male and female brains, and the difference in hormones, is what makes men men and women women and you you. What you said is basically complete nonsense - "What is tea was a cake but still tea?"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 09:03 AM
1

You know, it's interesting but I agree that this is not true. Funnily enough, I found this just yesterday. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201010/girls-are-more-intelligent-boys-men-are-more-intelligent Long ago I even went to /r/askscience and asked if there is any study/evidence between how quickly animals(in general, not just humans) mature and their intelligence, but alas, seems like I'm shadowbanned from there as well. Or just no one cared.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 09:00 AM
1

people are calling Sander's sexist or misogynist because he said rape is a serious crime and needs to have police involvement in all cases. Is there anything that needs to be said here? I mean if you read that sentence and don't find it hilariously ironic, there is literally no hope for you, even if someone explained it to you with a Venn diagram.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 08:56 AM
1

And in addition to that: does anyone actually believe that women don't lose their beauty with age? To be honest, with modern bauty products you really can keep yourself going for a long time.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 08:54 AM
5

Easy to say, harder to do, what with hundreds of thousands of years of biological conditioning and all.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 08:53 AM
3

You have to tell them that you want to be leader, not because you are better or more capable than them, but because you want to feel needed. At which point they leave you because needy bitches aren't attractive. Welp
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 08:34 AM
0

I would prefer that, for the aesthetics alone
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 08:29 AM
3

Everyone should make a "My take on TRP" thread
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 08:23 AM
2

barbaric
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 04:07 PM
0

I never once said "just have fun", implied that people should fuck around, or shouldn't date or form LTRs. You either date to have fun, or with the prospect of LTR(marriage). So if you don't date for LTR(because we've listened to you and that's "not the best idea in general"), you date to "just have fun". There is no third option. It's not even fucking close to what I said. Stop projecting. Haha, okay, sure. The end result is almost identical but your intentions were different, so it's like tota…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 01:16 PM
0

The whole "Don't marry young, just have fun(implied; if you're not dating with LTR in mind you're doing it for fun), you will marry when you're 25+(surprisingly close to TRP's Wall) and ~know what you want~(read: a beta provider)"? Or as Sheryl Sandberg put it in her feminist book, in almost perfect confirmation of the TRP long-term AFBB theory: "When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But d…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 12:13 PM
0

So when confronted with how much your rhetoric sounds like TRP rhetoric you... double down on it then claim it's sarcasm? 2tricky4me
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 11:41 AM
1

I just can't comprehend how can you agree with the narrative about how bad women are(because entited, preferential treatment, divorce rape, general incompetence, thrid wave feminism, gynocentrism, etc.) and not be a misogynist. You cannot make what is basically a giant "Women suck, and here is why:" sub and then do a 180 "But it's okay, because because". That does not make any logical sense.
/r/MGTOW12/01/16 11:38 AM
1

So you basically agree?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 11:27 AM
1

You make "cock carousel into beta bucks landing" sound so refined!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 11:12 AM
1

I thought my bf was 6ft til he told me he was 5'9 ...well yes, that's 1" of difference, rather easy to miss in hair alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 11:02 AM
3

Just remember, no one knows how short you are. What?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 11:01 AM
1

Dude if they married at 22, that "18 years later" is when they're both 40. That's pretty much menopause. Obviously she doesn't care by then.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 10:59 AM
0

Porn stars aren't gloified but they certainly aren't vilified either. I don't remember Gary Oldman being villified for his roles in The Professional or 5th Element either. Why? Because he's an actor and was acting. That's how most people view porn as well. Actors that are acting.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 10:51 AM
3

That link was fucking terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 10:47 AM
4

That "caveat" is included in the goddamn post title.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 10:32 AM
5

They come across as actively disliking women - as a whole species. Foolish. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 02:56 PM
1

What the fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 02:54 PM
0

Intelligence is worthless when not utilized, and most women don't. How few women are actually iresearchers, CEOs, and so on? How much do you lose from women not holding worthless humanist degrees? So no, this wouldn't make life worse "for half the population", just for the small minority of women who actually care about careers. It's like saying ban on homosexuality makes life worse for half the population because it deprives men of the choice of whom to fuck, completely ignoring that only 5% me…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 01:03 PM
2

Here someone admits that women are to be treated as children, legally pushed out of universities and have all their rights taken from them. And your counterargument to this - other than "no because no" - is?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 11:45 PM
18

They get angry at single mothers yet are exactly the type of men who create single mothers. TRP is quite adamant about birth control, and wait for the male pill like it's the second coming. So you will have to explain to me how having safe sex with women creates single mothers, because I'm just not getting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 11:44 PM
16

Shit I'm a man and I enjoy victimhood Self-pity feels so good
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 11:41 PM
6

You like watching children suffer? That's even worse.
/r/MGTOW09/01/16 09:59 PM
1

VR for games is just a gimmick though, as the inputs don't change - you're still going with mouse and WSAD. It's basically wearing monitor on your head. Movies(and therefore porn) have much greater potential.
/r/MGTOW09/01/16 09:57 PM
1

The one common trait of all living things is that they do everything to reproduce. Therefore we can say that this is the "meaning of life". Reproduce. If you reject that Meaning of Life, you're going to have to substitute your own.
/r/MGTOW09/01/16 09:50 PM
2

Most responses were level-headed(to the point of being boring) and some were outright supportive. If you've seen too many blue answers, it was probably because you instantly flew the MGTOW flag, and TRP and MGTOW are in a state of cold war so to speak. You went into a board where neither side will agree with you(and you STILL got level-headed and sometimes supportive comments) In other words, you're a bitch cherry-picking only negative answers(your "favourite comment" has one point, for fuck's s…
/r/MGTOW09/01/16 09:46 PM
3

Well... http://i.imgur.com/Ijgzwsk.png
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 04:29 PM
1

They could be some sort of socially-isolated degenerate in a basement or a morbidly obese person with no social skill surrounded by a bunch of cats. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 04:18 PM
1

Without even watching the video I am going to assume that by "sane" you mean "Conforming to the moral standards and opinions that I subscribe to" Now tell me, how right am I?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 04:17 PM
1

If she is building a Feminist Bomb in her secret volcano lair But I remain confident that TRP's most alpha agent, GayLubeOil, is going to foil her plans
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 04:00 PM
2

Who gives a shit about what you think. I am trying to create a meaningful definition of what "MGTOW" means and how it's different from just "Redpiller". Stop being so mad about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 12:04 AM
2

Oh come on, it's pretty clear that /r/theredpill is heavily biased towards the gigolo dandy result. And yeah, "refusing to play the game anymore" to me means not dating. Just prostitutes and at most one-night-stand hookups.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 11:51 PM
12

I cannot take MGTOW seriously because its premise is a delusion; You are not walking away from women, women are walking away from you. You are not attractive and thus you are trying to cope by insisting this was a choice. How something be a delusion when you acknowledge it? Even OP himself said that "dating is a drag". MGTOW and TRP share the knowledge base, you think we don't know what women want? Sexual Marketplace is laissez faire capitalism, where only the best(or rather those perceived as b…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 11:40 PM
1

A consensus seems to be forming that the baseline for a MGTOW is avoiding marriage and cohabitation. What's the difference between MGTOW and TRP then?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 11:25 PM
27

Never verbally indicate to a girl that you're attracted to her. Don't tell her she's beautiful or pretty or even cute. Girls hate the idea that some random guy wants to have sex with them. As soon as you do this, she'll start pulling away or try to friend-zone you. Found the unattractive male
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 11:18 PM
1

Hahaha, no. Locking people in jails is absolutely abuse. So can we do it or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 08:18 PM
5

People being nice to each other destroys a relationship? Pretty much, yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 07:34 PM
3

Well, maybe we're thinking of different 14-16. The way I see it 14-16 still has the "youth" factor while at the same time being pretty much fully developed body-wise.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 07:33 PM
1

superbeta traits that would improve and stabilize a relationship Beta traits do not improve relationships at any stage.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 07:32 PM
4

I'd say most LTRs fall apart because of the niceness, not assholiness. When you're nice you're available, when you're available you're not desirable, when you're not desirable you're not attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 07:28 PM
3

Ack, I done goofed up.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 07:23 PM
7

You want guys to get it and put effort into looking hot? Then try to contribute to a dating narrative that doesn't obfuscate women's preferences. Good luck with that considering women themselves don't even know what they want(sex-wise) most of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 07:22 PM
3

I'm surprised so few people voted for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 07:20 PM
3

Noneforeveralone.dll
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 07:16 PM
2

"I have potential to ruin your life but I'm nothing to be scared of"?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 05:47 AM
2

Ah, the old Reddit hate-a-roo
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 05:32 AM
2

Yeah. "Being human like everyone else" is not a positive comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 05:26 AM
2

Oh gosh, okay, you are taking life and women way too seriously right now. One, we're humans. You say that like it's a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 05:21 AM
1

Nothing in your post contradicts The Wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:55 AM
1

So if I have a lot of stupid unprotected sex with cheap hookers and contract HIV, I will be a hero because Doesn't matter. I have an incurable disease now.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:52 AM
1

Where are you from?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:51 AM
0

I hope one day you can look back on this and realize that abuse of another human being is not ok, ever So according to you we should not put criminals in jails, because that's abusive towards them?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:49 AM
1

So... do you have an actual counter-argument or do you just like writing words?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:45 AM
-1

That would be my pick too, because the "Red and Blue" dichotomy goes beyond PPD. It's applicable to any discussion on any topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:23 AM
1

Romance Industrial Complex Ha!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:17 AM
3

Huh? I don't get it. Tell him you're not looking for anything serious. Then get in a relationship the next week with someone else. Tell him to come over then fall asleep & don't answer the "I'm here" text #wastehistime2016 Leave his messages unread for a week, then finally text him back and tell him you was sleep.. The whole time #wasteHisTime2016 Women have been doing all that to men for decades without needing a twitter campaign for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:15 AM
1

[citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:06 AM
1

If you don't care, why are you on antidepressants? Also PPD is not a sex therapy center
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:04 AM
2

According to feminists, sure
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 10:06 PM
1

While I completely agree with the body of your post, your question is loaded because you use "love" and "attraction" interchangeably. Love, in the long-term sense, is nothing but attachment. And I don't think rules of attachment vary between genders. A hot chick could absolutely grow attached to a beta loser if she spent a lot of time with him(say, 5+ years). The catch here is, of course, that she wouldn't spend 5+ years with him because she wouldn't find him attractive in the slightest, so they…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 10:05 PM
18

So how do you guys live with yourself knowing that you're a part of this group, support this shit, and feel those things? How do you live with yourself knowing that you are incapable of rational thought and reason, and all of your opinions and beliefs are based solely on how "moral" or "good" something is, both terms dictated to you by your leftist overlords, which you accept blindly and without question? I'm genuinely asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 09:59 PM
1

What's with all the women?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 07:51 PM
1

Isn't this just soft femdom?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 07:48 PM
18

Yes, if you wish to just wrap yourself tight in sycophancy and wishful thinking bullshit, female friends are way better.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 05:55 AM
1

That is a shame. Wasn't it also Socrates that "said": "When men and woman are made equal, she becomes his superior"?
/r/MGTOW06/01/16 08:54 PM
3

Well, obviously. Long-term love(like familial love) is basically nothing but familiarity. The catch is getting there in the first place. If we take the basic 3 years dating + 3 years marriage(since most marriages fail before 3 years) that gives the woman six years to change her mind before the long-term love kicks in and you can finally get bald, fat and lazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:46 PM
1

Isn't this just semantics? If the man gets his unconditional motherly love, the woman loses her passion and respect for her partner. And if the woman gets her masculine performance, the man must give up his desire for effortless affection. But if the man does the "masculine performance" by default then it is effortless for him. And so he gets his "unconditional love" - at least from his perspective, because the conditions are always fulfilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:41 PM
2

The 5/10 man can compensate with non-physical traits though. I thought the scale included that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:36 PM
1

The 5/10 man can compensate with non-physical traits though. I thought the scale included that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:35 PM
1

By helping men who are not "natural alphas" Eh, most men are "natural alphas". They're just been told their entire lives to act beta. TRP, the way I see it, is for these people. "Natural betas" exist of course, but they're a minority, like male equivalent of tomboys. TRP won't help them much, because it would require them to pretend they're a completely different person their entire life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:33 PM
1

What could be the causes for this? Because in "Individualistic, prosperous, egalitarian, developed nations with higher gender equality" women are constantly bombarded with propaganda that they are just as good as men at everything. And therefore(whether this is actually said or not) they SHOULD be just as good as men at everything. Reality, of course, does not work that way. Most women aren't CEOs or even hold management positions, they are physically weaker, and while they get same level of edu…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:26 PM
2

Of course, then there's the "problem" of a 5/10 man getting to 10 years with a 7/10 woman in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:20 PM
9

There are A TON of nice guys who get laid. Average guys get GFs and married. And then divorced.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:16 PM
0

Also explains all these party one night stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:15 PM
1

And is it so despicable that, as an Asian, I should let it slide when ignorant people try to pass off the statement that an entire country is a "beta loser factory"? You should because it's true. Pretty much all core tenets of japanese culture go directly against classic alpha behavior. 2.Are you seriously going to reply to my comment without actually watching the film? Obviously. Ain't nobody got time for that. But even if I DID watch it, and even if it WASN'T just animated Run Lola Run, and it…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:07 PM
1

You are completely ignoring the quantity of offspring. If you have 18 kids and raise none of them "properly" some percentage of them (by grace of the state or just pure luck) will go on to make more kids. This is r-selection. If you have one kid and leave him or her a billion dollar trust fund, they'll prolly do alright. This is K-selection. The first scenario is more optimal("best") because the result is more of your offspring surviving.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 05:51 AM
5

Both sides mourn the exact same situation But only one makes a valid claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 05:48 AM
2

Examples of what counts as N-count shamming: (Father to Son) "Hey son, you should have a girlfriend by now" So if my father asks me when I'm going to get a degree, is he... wait, education-shaming me? Tell me, oh Tumblr Shaman
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 05:44 AM
4

Okay, but this is PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 05:42 AM
1

I have never witnessed a case where grown (read: mid20s+) women have a intense attraction to men who explicitly bully other men. How many grown(read: mid20s+) men have you seen who explicitly bully other men?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 05:40 AM
0

Hmm, how does that go again? Oh yeah! Nobody cares about your unsubstantiated opinion. That doesn't even make sense in the context of the conversation. I don't have to back anything up especially when I have used terms such as "in my experience" and "in my opinion". Yes, and therefore your opinion will be discarded accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 05:36 AM
0

It talks about this "beta, entitled" mindset that so many young men (not just Japanese men, but entirely applicable to American youth as well) feel I see in the one-two months I was gone from PPD it swinged back into being populated with blue drones, this time with a healthy dose of tumblr feminism. [Edit]I checked out the plot summary on Wikipedia and it doesn't even seem to support your retarded claim. Are you one of those people who think that LOTR was about WW2?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 05:27 AM
1

See, it's this kind of shit why people laugh at conspiracy theories. You can get THAT NEWS ABOUT RESEARCH THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE GUARDIAN from any other news site if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 05:25 AM
1

Last time I checked we were having a discussion about why RPers think men love unconditionally. Everything here is about opinions. So blue it's almost painful. A discussion where you don't back your point of view is meaningless. Show me facts, data, or at least some basic line of reasoning. No, it's not "all about opinions". If you just want to spew out opinions, well you already said yours, so why are you even replying to me? Are you trying to change my opinion? Can I change yours? Read the sid…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:20 PM
5

Okay dude, seriously, do you really see a 14 year old kid saying all that?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:16 PM
3

Those the have the hardest time growing out of said fantasies, in my opinion, are men. Nobody cares about your completely unsubstantiated opinion. Or are you really going to tell me that the majority of the men over at TRP aren't butthurt that women aren't the amazing and grateful princesses that they thought they were entitled to. Show me where TRP says, or implies, that they're entitled to anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:15 PM
6

It would be where the girl and boy are talking in the hall, and then suddenly the boy says "Hey girl, wanna come ride the cock carousel with me?" And then it starts from there. What starts? Particularly bad porn?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:11 PM
4

You know a study was answered honestly when "good looks" is 8th.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:09 PM
3

And then he is going to walk to this random girl in his class(in middle of puberty where even eye contact is awkward) and just start spewing out RP ideology? And then your teen daughter comes home and, as we all know teens are very open and close with their parents, lays it down on you? If I watched a TV show where such situation occured I would laugh out loud, close it and deleted the torrent.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:05 PM
4

Idol culture is so successful in Japan because Japanese culture is a beta loser factory. Do you see idol culture being successful anywhere in the west? Actually, we do. When we talk about teen girls and the likes of Justin Bieber. Curiously, the idea of a female idol male teenagers obsess about does not exist in the same capacity.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 08:58 PM
1

RED ASS
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 08:54 PM
2

Oh well, if you say so.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:56 PM
1

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2008/jun/16/neuroscience.psychology
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:56 PM
-2

I lean more to sensitivity and empathy than stoicism and aggression. The typical beta. But this doesn't add up to the autism. How can I be a highly sensitive aspie? Maybe you're not autistic. "Female brained men" are called gays, and "Male brained females" are called lesbians, so it's obvious what they should do(i.e. stop reading TRP which is all about heterosexuality)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 08:08 AM
2

Can status: opened Worms status: rampaging
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 03:17 AM
1

The Game(of dating and relationship) is heavily unfair and loaded in favor of women. TRP plays it nonetheless, exploiting the rules and cheating where possible to win. MGTOW just walks away from the table. And yes, the sidebar "summary" is just some random ramblings.
/r/MGTOW04/01/16 10:43 PM
2

Men want to know HOW and WHY. TRP answers both of these questions, and ONLY THEN says "go lift." Haha, yeah. It's funny how you can say "Get fit, be confident, lead" and all the bloops will just roll their eyes and say "Well DUH, that's OBVIOUS, everyone KNOWS that". But when TRP says "Get fit because women love fit men, be confident because women love confidence, lead because women love leaders" then it's "misogyny".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 07:09 AM
2

You mean you didn't even have to cut some man's balls off to join?!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 06:49 AM
1

Do you even understand what am I asking about? Okay, the "she wanted to settle down and I didn't" is pretty obvious, but what the fuck does "growing apart" mean? What does "getting bored of each other" mean? That's like physicist saying "Yeah, so sometimes light acts like a particle and sometimes like a wave. Why? Well that's just life". That is not an explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 09:58 AM
1

Truly you are the Galileo of our time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 09:50 AM
1

from becoming bored each other, to follow different goals in life or simply to fall out of love And again you miss the point: why does that happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 09:42 AM
1

Experienced what exactly? What does "growing apart" mean? How do you "get bored with one another"? What you seem to be missing is that you - and as you point out, many others - simply have no fucking idea why your relationships ended.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 07:08 AM
1

Right, just all like these chaste whores I see running around.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 07:07 AM
2

And you actually believe these bullshit empty statements are legitimate reasons?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 04:32 PM
2

Indeed, it makes no logical sense at all. And yet its true. I don't know what's more crazy: that you walked right out of one completely illogical statement into another, or that you've been upvoted in both cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 04:20 PM
1

So have you ever wondered... why
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 04:19 PM
4

So do you have any actual proof that women are better traders than men? Your first link is just some random blog post. Your second link claims women make better traders, but has exactly 0 data to back it up. And your next tree links are videos that I can't be arsed to watch, and it's unlikely someone put out a study in a video format anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 07:09 AM
1

I get laid often enough and every relationship I had was fun and ended "So good it ended" is one of my favourite blue fallacies
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 07:03 AM
1

I am not obligated to biology, it's not my master Stop breathing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 07:02 AM
2

What is the Redpill theory about women who take care of their chronically sick or disabled husbands? Probably the same as about female doms, genuine lesbians, and female pedophiles. "Tiny minority, who cares"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 07:00 AM
1

BP and greater society doesn't need to know anything about TRP because BP and greater society does not operate on logic and facts but rather or emotions and morals. In their view, things that are "good" are right, and things that are "bad" are wrong, and no amount of reasoning will change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 06:59 AM
3

They use sex for validation and only care about adding another notch to their bedpost so they feel manly and like they "won". Unlike "sweet and caring men" who use dominant sex as a way to express how sweet and caring they really are?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 06:57 AM
2

Why do people think ugly men have it better than ugly women? No one thinks that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 06:56 AM
1

Women shouldn't vote because they're emotional beings.I think this claim is not logical simply because democracy was never,ever in history about logic. These two arguments are not even connected in any way. Democracy is a bad system,we should create a system where only the logical ones vote. I think that when people say the logical ones should vote really mean "those who agree with me should vote". And I think you're being exceptionally thick today. Making it so only the rationals get to vote is…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 06:54 AM
7

This doesn't even make logical sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 06:51 AM
37

Never marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 06:50 AM
2

What aspects of her feminism might drive you away from sleeping with her? More like what aspects of her feminism might drive her from sleeping with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 12:57 PM
0

If A -> B, then if B, A.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 12:55 PM
1

The general consensus is for polygyny. And what does hypergamy has to do with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 07:41 AM
5

Funny. I could say the same about Red Pillers. The idea that women are all essentially honorless, lying, backstabbing, worthless parasites... but that's fine because "it's just their nature" is grade-A solipsism. It's even worse than the NAWALT of blues - at least NAWALT is based on an invalid premise, but logically consistent, while the Red Pill approach is based on the correct premise then logically ass-backwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 06:22 AM
1

Some people are sapiosexual. Some identify sexually as an attack helicopter.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 06:16 AM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monogamy#The_evolutionary_and_historical_development_of_monogamy_in_humanity:_nature_vs._nurture
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 06:15 AM
1

The line between "motivated" and "desperate" is pretty thin.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 06:09 AM
1

How the fuck can you be aware of TRP yet sit around slurping empty calories of soda and playing freaking Call of Duty? I prefer OpenTTD to Call of Duty(which, thinking about it, is even worse as far as my manhood is concerned), I'll tell you how: Am MGTOW. Don't care about relationships with women. I appreciate TRP for the theory, not the practice.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 06:08 AM
1

Polygyny. The natural sexual model of humans, before technology and economy interfered.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 06:03 AM
1

Either an obvious injury(i.e. broken limb) that can't be healed "naturally" or some kind of symptom for an extended period of time, depending on how deliberating/uncomfortable it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 06:02 AM
2

So back to polygyny then?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 05:58 AM
1

Why would I? 30-40% more upper body strength, 20-30% more lower body strength. Oh, also wants to fuck you 22/7(I leave two hours for the refractory periods) Logically, why wouldn't you be careful around people like that? Because "civilzed society"?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 07:25 AM
1

Kind of like how criminals and sociopaths justify themselves with "who cares about the potential consequences and morality and what all. Time to lie cuz #yolo." I They don't say that at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 06:24 AM
2

The study also shows it has nothing to do with how women dress or acting as sluts. It shows absolutely nothing of the sort. That was just some random one-off comment of someone jumping on the "B-B-B-BUT BLAMING THE VICTIM!" bandwagon.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 06:22 AM
1

Therefore all women should treat every man they ever encounter as if he is a rapist. Okay. Do you have a point here?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 06:18 AM
1

"Sexual love"? There's nothing like that. It's "just sex", for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 06:14 AM
7

Watch what men do, not what they say. This rule only works for people who have options. "Watch all these people say they want to live in Italy, then buy cheap apartments in british suburbs."
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 06:12 AM
1

Why can't it be both? The "chemistry" doesn't happen because she knows(even if only subconsciously) that she can(or rather should) do better?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 06:08 AM
1

Women who would not allow another person to come to harm if they could help it. But, you know what? AWALT. Every one of them was hypergamous: Given a chance to trade up, they'd take it. So... they would not allow another person come to harm if they could help it, but they would hurt men they were in relationship with(by leaving them) because of hypergamy? That doesn't make much sense to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 06:05 AM
0

If guys like Dean Esmay undertook these values, he would be MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE in pushing the MRA agenda. I think the catch here is, if he was an alpha he wouldn't bother pushing for men's rights, because he would not need to.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 06:23 AM
1

even though it's only a small niche that only very few people engage in. I assume you have data to back that up?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 06:17 AM
1

How can you be sure its women passing you over for someone better/higher SMV and not because there is something fundamentally wrong with you Isn't this one and the same? If there's something "fundamentally wrong with you", most people will be better options.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 06:15 AM
0

Many people go into relationships expecting/wanting monogamy Oh let me blue-argument it to you now Not all people go into relationships expecting/wanting monogamy, therefore expecting/wanting monogamy from relationships is nonsensical.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 06:13 AM
1

You see where I'm going with this. Yes, typical bloop "Since it doesn't work 1% of the time, it never works" fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 06:12 AM
2

All "communication" is trap relationship advice, and counseling is "communication" that you have to pay for.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 06:10 AM
2

ikr
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 08:04 AM
1

anger, resent and misogyny, which are irrational and negative emotions I won't even comment on "negative", but do explain how any of these are irrational.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 06:35 AM
1

You are the unsung hero of our time
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 06:34 AM
3

It is logically impossible for someone to be BP and "care about truth".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 06:32 AM
3

The same old RP solipsism. If you're angry, you are still clinging to this idea of fairness. So, if you get passed on the promotion in favor of the obviously less experienced co-worker because he's the boss' cousin, you cannot be angry about it. That's just universe being unfair. So, if your father gets run over by a drunk driver, you cannot be angry at him. That's just universe being unfair. So, if a bunch of sweaty ugly [insert minority you like the least here] assault you and rape you in the …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 06:30 AM
2

You are miserable and lonely. You read about or recognize TRP stuff all around you and eventually you get angry. Angry at what? You are missing out on an important part of life. You already estabilished him as "miserable and lonely". I think he already realizes he's missing out.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 06:20 AM
1

Why would you even, as a male, be on that campus? As a member of that university? When you risk getting sentenced and jailed just for showing up, you don't show up.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 06:15 AM
2

What makes attractive women different from normal women, preference-wise?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 06:14 AM
3

So, still nothing huh. You know, funny thing. The communists tried to change the basic human nature and failed completely. Then the liberals tried(well, still try) to change the basic human nature and fail completely. Then I remember that seventies experiment where they tried to raise boys as girls... oh man. That didn't went too well either. So sorry, but you are going to need some damn solid studies to prove your point, as the evidence to the contrary of it is simply overwhelming.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 04:28 PM
-2

I mean this is all pretty well-known stuff you can google. Funny how it's the "pretty well-known stuff you can google" that is always the kind of thing people can never deliver on.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 09:59 AM
2

Look at post See a lot of black text No blue links Don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 08:06 AM
1

This doesn't mean that we shouldn't criticize them for the shit they say. Because if you criticize the tone you are not criticizing the shit they say, but the way they say it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 06:42 AM
2

"You're a beta faggot" Way to make assumptions about people you don't even know in real life. If someone is acting like a beta faggot, why should we not call him a beta faggot?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 06:41 AM
4

It's interesting that this sentence contradicts the vast majority of scientific research done into the mind since the 50's. You can very easily change even the most basic functions of the human mind. Well, time to back it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 06:37 AM
6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_sex_differences#Brain_differences_between_homo-_and_heterosexuals "Lesbians probably aren't 'W'" is a surprisingly accurate response.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 06:36 AM
0

And if there are better studies, link to them instead of this shitty one.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:36 AM
5

This is vague and psychological of course And "women tasted work" isn't? Look, link me to an example of this "basic, universal history" because I'm just not buying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:26 AM
3

This question plainly does not ask about any and all sexual encounters where the respondent was intoxicated. It does by the way the question was formulated. What the author thinks they were asking is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:25 AM
5

Being drunk means you can't consent by default, so that question is completely circular. And if there are better studies, link to them instead of this shitty one.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:11 AM
3

That's like asking why security companies talk so much about robberies. Do you even understand what you're saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:10 AM
1

As a (self-diagnosed lol) low-T guy, no. It really isn't. Low-T will help you whack it off less, but it will also hamper you in just about every other aspect of life, from interpersonal relations to job performance.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:08 AM
7

I've had 'rape culture' explained to me as not a literal culture of rape, but a culture where..hmm...saying things like "I'll rape you faggot huehuehue" on steam is accepted as normal Funny how "I'll rape you faggot huehuehue" is "rape culture" and not "homophobic culture"(faggot) and "xenophobic culture"(huehuehue being the mocking representation of brazilian laughter)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:06 AM
3

I can vaguely see the connection between WWII and women in workforce(men get shipped to the front -> women have to work, also greatly increased economic output for war reasons, of course it kind of ignores what happens when these men come back home, and if women were "freed" in 1945 what was the point of the 1970s feminism?), but how the birth control pill affects women in workforce I cannot even begin to fathom.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:04 AM
2

Great, now not only I need a tinfoil hat, but a tinfoil condom as well
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:01 AM
3

So many links to Wikipedia and popular press and websites! Amusingly, I cannot even access everydayfeminism.com because my company's IP blocker counts it as "Society and Lifestyles" catagory.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 06:58 AM
4

See, this is why we never wanted women to work. But you whined and criend and threw a tantrum that no, you not only want to take care of the house and kids, you want to slave away at the office too. So... here you go. You're welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 06:50 AM
10

But this cabinet is one big fucking game of 'oppression olympics' instead of choosing based on merit. No cabinet was ever chosen based on merit, so don't worry about it.
/r/MGTOW12/11/15 08:19 AM
1

And more importantly, how?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 07:47 AM
2

She taught me that using sex as a bargaining chip is a good idea. It is a terrible idea, so I don't use it Do you use makeup?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 07:46 AM
1

What you call "anger phase" is nothing but a rational reaction to the truth about male/female social dynamics. "Moving past anger phase" is nothing but TRP hamstering. It's basically "Okay, women all DO suck, but I still can't live without them, so I will pretend it's fine that they do". It's like finding out that your business partner has been screwing you over for decades, but not having the balls to call him out on it - so you make up excuses like "That's just the way he is, so it's fine". Pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 07:44 AM
1

"Well, you're posting pictures of men without their permission and asking people to rate them. How would you feel if a man did that to you?" Sorry let me stop you right here. When you post your picture to a public Internet website, you automatically agree to a) it being redistributed without your constent and b) it being "rated"(viewed) by other people. Especially if that site is OKCupid, since that's pretty much what that site is for. I can see your point about female hypocrisy in this context,…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 07:25 AM
1

I think RMV should be based on the following SMV already includes most of these. And SMV is fine because sex is based on attraction, and so are relationships. Your "Relationship Market Value" sounds like something for post-wall women to use when looking for a good beta bux to settle with, nothing else.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 07:19 AM
16

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_clothing When you find stating facts offensive, it's time to re-evaluate your position.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 07:14 AM
1

"could"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 03:10 PM
6

How do you know they're not valid premises for anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 03:09 PM
3

Therefore, it appears from historical perspectives, men aren't so keen on sacrificing themselves for women in most disaster/life and death situations. This seems counter to the disposable male myth that BP pushes forward. Not really. Men are disposable when rules and order are enforced. In an "everyone for himself/herself" situation obviously no one cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 03:07 PM
0

Top 20% men won't give all women a chance. Especially not fat women. Women who only go for the top 20% of men and are themselves not top 20% will either be lonely or have to lower their standards. We did polygyny before, we can do it again. Obviously 100% women won't get with top 20% of men, but 60% of women could easily do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 03:04 PM
1

Nothing about that is clear. Whether you "desire a good mate" and "do not want a bad mate" is entirely subjective and depends on where you, personally, draw a line between "good" and "bad". So I am surprised how could they even measure it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:31 AM
1

Stop rephrasing everything into your own BP view and actually listen to what is being said.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:29 AM
-3

Children were working too. My father used to "watch cows" for example, which involved swinging a stick around, blowing up frogs and trying to smoke... well whatever he and other boys could find, really. So do you have any point here that I'm missing or can I just start laughing in your face how you're an idiot that thinks "work" is just this singular thing, without qualities like "importance" "difficulty" "efficiency" or "risk"? That is a rhetorical question, by the way. Of course you are, you'r…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:26 AM
2

I fail to see how this adresses my point in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 07:13 AM
1

Neither sex is having a great big party and certainly not at the expense of the other. Do tell me how women in America right now are not having a great big party at the expense of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 07:11 AM
1

It's both amusing and interesting to see no one actually addressing your question OP, instead focusing on throwing ad hominem at Roosh(that I am in no way a fan of myself). This is how much PPD is really worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 07:10 AM
2

If you get the enjoyable sex in the first place. Sorry most men suck at it. Men suck at it or women are just impossible(metaphorically speaking) to please? What was that statistic, that most women can't even orgasm from pure PIV sex? You cannot orgasm from direct stiumlation of your sexual organ and it's the MEN that are the problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 07:05 AM
12

This is why we need downvotes on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 06:59 AM
1

So "only" for over 80% of the population? http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/resources/FAQ.html#Age
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 06:56 AM
3

Your very top post in this thread. You didn't use these words exactly, but meaning was pretty much the same. Standard clutch "Oh he called me a slut, well he's a bitter virgin".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:30 PM
3

Yeah, and if he was talking to a man, it would be "Hey bro, can I borrow a twenty?" "No" "Whatever fag" Therefore we can conclude men call other men fags as a defense mechanism for... okay I won't even bother anymore. Just stop posting.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 03:11 PM
7

Women do not virgin shame men. Even though /u/Iamyourmarriage did not even 24 hours ago? I am not projecting, you are literally in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 03:10 PM
8

Defense mechanism? When you are angry at someone, you will say words to offend them. Men say "sluts" because to a man that's a very offensive word. Men value chastity in women. Just like /u/Iamyourmarriage, as a woman, values success and sexual prowess in men, so when she wants to offend them she calls them virgin losers. There's no "defense mechanism" at work here, and it only seems weird because you're missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 12:54 PM
2

I'd posit that walking around with a "fuck you, everyone but me" attitude isn't going to help you in life. There is literally nothing that will help you more in life than "fuck you, everyone but me" attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 10:41 AM
7

Slut-shaming is nothing more than a mixture of not being able to mind your own business and sour grapes(why won't she fuck me? Waaaahh). How does that theory fit into the fact that women slut shame more than men do? Even women who are sluts themselves will shame women for being sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 07:14 AM
6

Why would a guy that just fucked you call you a slut to your face?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 07:11 AM
1

In fact, I believe that the biggest reason that religion was invented in the first place was to prevent Chads from hoarding all of the women in a tribe and castrating all the betas. Religion is an end result of societal norms, not the source of it. Unless you really believe in the whole god coming down from heaven and giving humans laws written on stone tablets thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 07:06 AM
1

You assume that female nature==women being horrible. Pretty much, yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:57 AM
-4

And /r/theredpill(yes) and /r/mgtow and /r/misogyny... though the last one is porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:56 AM
1

Remember that time when online survey showed 5x difference between female and male reported partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:54 AM
1

I shall take your position into consideration.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 03:36 PM
1

TRPs are result of feminization, not bullying. What are you even talking about. Because showing your emotions = being a whiny bitch right? Basically, yes. "Showing your emotions" is unproductive and achieves nothing. Because telling men to "suck it up" has worked so well for our suicide rate, right? Show me that telling men to "suck it up" increases their suicide rate. Then cross-reference it with data how many men it helped because negative reinforcement appealed to their masculinity. Of course…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 03:31 PM
2

I think that they are being oversensitive carebears who don't realize(or can't accept due to their social marxist brainwashing) that you can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs. Oh no, men are told to control their emotions! They are denied the chance to be whiny bitches that sit down and cry instead of acting about their circumstances! How horrible! Toxic masculinity! Oh no, men are judged in terms of masculinity! They are denied the chance to be worthless doormats and actually judge…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 03:14 PM
2

Not enough to outweight the positive aspects, that's for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 03:05 PM
2

You don't need to be rational to finish college no matter what's your degree. If you were rational you'd know this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 02:57 PM
2

I don't know, what about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 02:38 PM
2

You cannot have discourse with someone incapable of logical reasoning, and if you believe in that "toxic masculinity" nonsense you are by default incapable of logical reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 02:31 PM
5

I love my parents because they raised me and care about me. No, you love them because you've spent most of your life with them. It's just attachment, just like you can be attached to anything. Your character in World of Warcraft. A bike. Your dog. You get more attached to people because they're infinitely more complicated and therefore irreplaceable. You can get another character in WoW, another bike, and even another dog. But once your mother dies, you will never get another one. Ever. That is …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 11:21 AM
2

Are you greek?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 07:31 AM
2

Looks or lifting? Because there's a shitload of difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 06:58 AM
2

So both sides admit that good relationship is based on deception...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 06:54 AM
0

rmv the hell is this now and how is dating different from a relationship market? Is dating not a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 06:43 AM
4

toxic masculinity Stop talking
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 06:41 AM
3

SJW, feminist or "the jews" No, it's just the general populace. Like the lies we tell children(that santa, that if you're good people will be good to you as well, that you can be/do whatever you want, that granma "moved away", etc.), just adult edition. Not how world works, but how we wish it did. Despite the mountain of evidence to the contrary. I mean just listen to yourself: relationships based on mutual respect, trust, honesty, fairness, support and communication Holy shit! it's like reading…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 05:37 PM
2

Healthy relationships are based on trust, love and an emotional chemistry. [citation needed] [avoid weasel words] So basically you have no argument, other than your feelz(that aren't even yours, but a result of lifetime of feel-good brainwashing).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 03:50 PM
10

Not attracted to dudes. Then... why are you even answering?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 12:31 PM
2

Well, I'm sorry about that. Hope you'll get better.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 12:25 PM
2

My point is that once these people try to have relationships beyond ONS's, they will have some seriously unhealthy attitudes that will cause them to fail. Such as?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 12:24 PM
1

In a letter to members of the Backbench Business Committee the alliance of charities and experts, led by Calm, urged MPs to help “break down the stigma that prevents too many men from seeking help”. Apparently the solution to the "crisis of masculinity" is more emasculation. It's amazing how something as fundamental and simple can be so misunderstood.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 12:14 PM
1

tldr: I'm in a healthy, happy, relatively equal relationship. You are in an long distance relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 07:22 PM
-1

I dismiss "things" because they are so blatantly wrong(or rather, so blatantly misused by you) that I don't even have to click the link. As you can see throughout these comments I've been careful to read and analyze the information I have been presented with, even if it runs counter to my beliefs. No, not really. Not seeing much of that in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 07:09 AM
1

That is only true if you plan to kill yourself in near future. Otherwise, I'm sorry... but as a woman in a first world country you can easily live to 70-80.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 06:59 AM
1

Then... you are just shit out of luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 06:47 AM
2

I don't like to spend a lot of time thinking about scanarios that are obviously impossible, but my initial gut feeling tells me the gender age SMV would be reversed. Men would hit "The Wall" instead of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 06:46 AM
1

For one thing it would start to get really weird when three generations of women all looked like sisters. If by "weird" you mean "hot"...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 06:45 AM
1

pill-kin Which pill you identify as?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 06:38 AM
1

No matter how soft-spoken and feminine or fashionable you are, you'll not attract a lot of male attention at 40+
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 06:36 AM
1

I don't want to be treated this way. I do not wish to be treated in a way that is any different that from the way one would treat a respected colleague or friend that one has no potential sexual interest in. I want to be treated as an equal in all aspects of life. Then you are shit out of luck. Maybe become a supervillain then release mutagen-X into atmoshpere that will make everyone genderless.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 06:34 AM
3

Your "sources and facts" are bullshit. If you were rational you'd know this.trollface
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 07:35 AM
8

So many weasels. What is "rational trading in the markets"? If I take a calculated risk when investing, knowing I can win big when I risk big(for example, say... because I am a single male and thus don't have to worry about financially endangering myself), does that make me "irrational"? IQ and "capacity for rational thought" are almost entirely different things. Especially since IQ tests are made so that males and females score equally in the first place. And what the hell does college success …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 07:12 AM
1

What does "insecurity" even mean in this context?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 06:29 AM
6

So what's your proof for them being rational adults?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 06:28 AM
2

Women shouldn't be pedestalized but they also shouldn't be degraded below the level of men. Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 06:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter