TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RandomRedditGuy322 Archive

View 49 posts and 1,234 comments by RandomRedditGuy322 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
343

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/21 06:53 PM
247

MisandryRandomRedditGuy322/r/AntiFeminists02/08/22 06:51 PM
187

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 10:47 PM
166

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 07:51 AM
135

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 06:55 PM
103

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 11:59 PM
85

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 01:36 PM
81

DiscussionRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 03:19 PM
55

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 05:44 PM
35

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 04:03 PM
32

RandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:23 PM
30

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 09:57 PM
22

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 12:54 PM
20

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 03:33 AM
20

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 08:00 PM
18

Question For WomenRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 10:48 PM
18

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 01:47 AM
16

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 08:23 AM
16

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 09:07 PM
15

RandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:42 AM
12

DebateRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 02:53 AM
7

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 02:52 PM
6

RandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:15 AM
4

RandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 09:22 PM
4

DiscussionRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/21 01:40 AM
3

RandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 02:30 PM
3

DiscussionRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 03:21 AM
3

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 07:35 PM
2

DiscussionRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:53 AM
2

RandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 12:40 AM
1

PURGE WEEKRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 01:23 AM
1

DiscussionRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 03:21 PM
1

Social IssuesRandomRedditGuy322/r/MensRights02/08/22 06:43 PM
1

Social IssuesRandomRedditGuy322/r/MensRights02/08/22 05:02 PM
0

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 06:16 AM
0

ScienceRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 05:07 PM
0

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 12:22 PM
0

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 05:47 PM
0

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 09:40 PM
0

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 03:56 PM
0

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 09:42 PM
0

Question For WomenRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 07:06 AM
0

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 03:35 PM
0

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 07:07 AM
0

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 07:52 AM
0

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 05:06 PM
0

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 01:02 AM
0

RandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 12:36 AM
0

CMVRandomRedditGuy322/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 02:16 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,234 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
61

She's eyeing 2028 it seems.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 01:36 AM
-8

Yup. This is why female bosses are much worse to work for than male bosses.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 05:48 PM
10

TRP is simply a reaction to the societal decline we've witnessed in recent years. Most of this decline is due to the status quo (aka blue pill ideology) and how they have propped up modern feminism. Modern feminism is the root cause of not only the decline of dating, but our society itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 03:02 PM
21

The status hoe, if you would.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 05:27 AM
–

WORDS WORDS WORDS
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 05:21 AM
102

She's being charged with reckless homicide, which in Indiana only carries a sentence of up to six years in prison. Why she isn't being charged with ordinary homicide is beyond me. She clearly suffocated the young boy to intentionally end his life. The prosecutors are intentionally under charging her, almost certainly because she is a woman.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 06:07 AM
3

Men are conditioned under a gynocentric society. We are literally brainwashed from birth to ignore it to focus on the well being of women.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:44 PM
10

Woke politics is directly opposed to men's rights. I don't see the harm in laughing at their failure when their ideology causes so much pain and harm in our society, especially towards men.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 07:02 PM
1

Those aren't controversial or unpopular
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 04:02 AM
0

✅️ The number of people that falsely believe something can't constitute censorship unless a government entity is involved is astounding. Shows a complete lack of research and critical thinking skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 07:09 PM
1

And that's irrelevant. Because consent is verbal. All the kit proves is sex. In the case you reference, it proves very rough sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 10:50 PM
1

That still could be sex. Rape has nothing to do with roughness, and only has to do with consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 10:33 PM
3

Even a test kit can only prove sex, not rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 04:08 PM
3

I'll tell you what i don't find to be sufficient is when we don't hear as much as a peep for 30 years then all of a sudden a week after the person opposes the democrats or woke culture we see 30 brave "silence breakers" come forward to tell their "heroic" tale of how they were taken advantage of which of course gives the elites the perfect excuse to silence the accused without any evidence whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 03:26 PM
2

Independence from a society that hates men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 10:33 AM
1

no fatties, be interested in me, and be a pleasant person.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 12:38 AM
13

Hey Reddit Admins, if you're reading this: ​ ....................../´¯/) ....................,/¯../ .................../..../ ............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸ ........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\ ........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...') .........\.................'...../ ..........''...\.......... _.·´ ............\..............( ..............\.............\...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 12:46 AM
9

I have more respect for PPD now that they've experienced a big janny ban too
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 12:37 AM
-4

Yeah, you're on it. The rules our society created around dating are heavily gynocentric. They emphasize that anything happened before you started being together is irrelevant, and anything that happens after you're together you can never move on from. For example, take a girl that's screwed 20 dudes before meeting a guy, and that guy has only screwed 2 other girls himself. In a society where the rules were written for fairness in mind, the dude would get to sleep with 18 more girls over the cour…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 04:37 PM
6

Men who have the ability to date neuro typical women shouldn't poach down and try to date autistic women. The autistic Bros have a hard enough time already so it's only respectful to leave autistic women to them. This also applies to autistic men who are high functioning enough to date a NT woman too. Only poach down if you need to. It's a simple courtesy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 03:29 AM
3

misandrist garbage
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 07:31 PM
1

Many people philosophiz about the difference between right and the left. But it's quite simple. The difference is this. Right: poo poo doody head Left: pooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo pooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Dooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooody Heaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 02:13 PM
7

The wall of text is certainly on brand for a leftist
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 03:53 AM
1

no
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 03:32 AM
1

Even if the technology was perfected it would still amount to pseudoscientific dribble. The only way for reliable lie detection is if the machine was omnipotent, and since that doesn't and can't exist, any results from a lie detector would never be accurate to any degree of certainty.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 03:54 AM
1

7 without a doubt
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 11:28 PM
0

no
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 11:24 PM
3

Forever alone then
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 01:13 AM
3

so i could still screw prostitutes or women casually?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 01:01 AM
4

define forever alone
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 12:53 AM
6

thin
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 12:05 AM
–

I'm not sure whether it would be illegal. This is gender based discrimination done by a state government, implicating the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment. Gender is a quasi suspect class and as such actions by state governments discriminating on the basis of gender are examined under the intermediate scrutiny test. Laws will be upheld under intermediate scrutiny if the state can show that the law substantially advances an important government interest. In other words, the law would…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 04:02 AM
3

I know nothing about this controversy and my comment is not a value add to this thread in any capacity whatsoever
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 03:41 AM
–

It absolutely is gendered de facto. Men are buyers of sex, women are sellers. Only decriminalzing the selling while keeping the buyers criminal is discrimination against men, plain and simple. Blatant misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 02:42 AM
–

Yeah that's about what I would expect to hear from an "egalitarian" feminist. "Egalitarian" Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 02:13 AM
1

So if someone had their family killed by the British military whats their recourse then? Try and advocate peaceful independence? Why is one side allowed to use violence and one is not? Just because they fly the flag of a recognized nation? That's the only reason they get to be thugs and kill people anytime they please? If their independence isn't granted, their only option is to fight. And fighting is going to involve taking lives, both military and civilian. That's a simple reality, like it or …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 05:55 PM
1

And I'm sure many members of the IRA have had family members killed by the British army too. Especially lineal predecessors such as grandparents or great grandparents. When there's blood on both sides its nonsensical to only focus on one sides suffering and label the other side terrorists.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 01:07 PM
3

I'm not even British but I'll be the first to say the IRA is based as fuck. If you brits didn't want them fucking with you you shouldn't have terrorized the Irish people for hundreds of years.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 12:32 PM
30

Wikipedia is a source of left wing opinions. It isn't objective, despite their efforts to make themselves appear as such
/r/MensRights05/07/23 06:55 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 12:37 PM
1

scroll r/197
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 03:26 AM
38

On the Hot Crazy Matrix, only half of the graph was covered in the no go zone. Where as in the female version, 80% of the graph is covered in the no go zone. That my friend, is the only important observation gleaned from this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 03:13 AM
38

Courts ruling applies to race, not gender. Colleges could still use AA for gender based admissions.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 06:00 PM
4

master chief is probably blue pill since he isn't capable of defying orders. Flood aren't pilled at all they're just trolls.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 08:35 PM
4

That's the million dollar question, isn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 07:29 PM
3

TRP is growing despite its marginalization. This doesn't mean it's not bring marginalized, it means it's winning people over genuinely despite the powers that be trying to keep it down. No one forces anyone to get pregnant. And yeah you still can, in fact, protest abortion even if you have 6 kids. And even if you can't personally feminists enjoy power within the power structure and as such enjoy systemic representation which allows all of them to be represented by the few influential powers of o…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 07:29 PM
3

If people merely disagreed with TRP and had arguments against TRP that would be fine. But the systemic purging of TRP content and discrimination against TRP ideas and content creators does not constitute mere disagreement. The fact is that TRP has had a modern struggle to exist in recent years, almost entirely due to the entities of power in our society attempting to socially engineer around TRP. It's not that they disagree with it, they want to exterminate it. In your example you haven't offere…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 06:37 PM
3

❤️
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 05:36 PM
3

I mean again that's another difference of opinion. You think being "for life" should mean one thing, and someone else thinks it should be for another. As stated earlier, that's not retaliation. Especially because you can freely criticize such a policy and no power to criticizing it is being divested from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 05:03 PM
3

It isn't a lie to suggest some people believe life starts at conception. That's simply a fact. There's a disagreement about when life start, so saying it does definitely start at conception wouldn't be a fact but rather an opinion. Just because feminists think that people are trying to attack them when in reality people only have a difference of opinion on when life starts doesn't really matter. Because there is a genuine issue of dispute as to when life starts. That's a closely held belief that…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 05:00 PM
4

Well it would be retaliation if those enacting statutes restricting abortion were doing it for the express purpose of countering feminism. But the reality is that the issue of abortion centers around where human life begins. Those that support abortion bans think that life starts either at conception or early on in the pregnancy. Hence because it stems from this disagreement as to where human life begins, it really isn't a strong argument to say that feminism itself is being retaliated against. …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 04:51 PM
7

I'll never apologize for Halo 2 happening
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 04:38 PM
3

I mean 70 years ago you could make an argument that feminists were the underdogs I the west. But at least in the modern day I can't think of any entity of power that has retaliated against feminism and advocated for patriarchy in the West (not counting mere ideological disagreement which is fine). But there are countless entities of power that have retaliated against Andrew Tate and other RP creators or leaders that maybe you could say appeal to TRP like Trump. Though Trump himself isn't really …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 04:36 PM
4

If something is truly racist, then once it is said you can fight it in the marketplace of ideas and you will win if you make a good enough argument and the content is truly racist. However, just because the powers that be label something as racist, doesn't make it racist. And labeling arbitrarily and without reason all content that you dislike as racist under false pretenses is not only unjust, but worse than the actual racism you sought to prevent. In giving the powers that be the ability to si…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 04:34 PM
2

Because if they are truly lying, you shouldn't need to retaliate against them. You can just show they are lying. Suppressing them while providing no reasoning only shows that you are the liar, and attempting to cover up by silencing those that oppose you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 04:28 PM
8

If BP is telling the truth then they have no reason to lash out against TRP and use their incumbent power in society to keep TRP down.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 04:25 PM
2

Not really. Unless you're talking about their political position than sure. But political values and social values are different. They don't truck with all the woke horseshit of the west politically, but socially they are still basically hedonist.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:57 PM
26

There are more abortions in Russia than live births. The average man dies of alcoholism in his 50s/60s. Russia isn't a traditional society at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:54 PM
11

Just because you haven't mentally grown up doesn't mean you aren't physically older. Women aren't any more attractive now as opposed to the past. In fact, modern women are fatter, uglier, and hold themselves to some of the lowest standards of all time. This is evidenced by rising obesity rates and the body positivity movement among women. The only difference is that women now have photoshop and snapchat filters. Which gives the impression there's tons of these 30 something attractive young looki…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:51 PM
–

Kanye has put on a shit ton of weight wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 02:45 AM
1

whip out my dick in the middle of the park
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:44 PM
0

What obligation? A legal one? Of course not. A moral one? Most definitely. If they want to consider their rating system as "just" or "good" that is. Of course, they don't need to consider themselves justified or good, and are within their rights to label themselves delusional, but if they want to have a valid rating system then they do owe it to society to use logical rating system that accurately and adequately balanced the make population among the ratings numbers. And if they don't, men have …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 02:17 PM
5

The bologna and cheese sandwich on white bread I made for lunch today has more value than this woman.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/06/23 03:24 AM
6

Body positivity was never about promoting acceptance of "all" bodies. They don't care about burn victim's bodies. They don't care about short bodies. They don't care about male bodies. They don't care about bodies with small penises despite the constant ridicule they have in society with common verbiage describing them in a derogatory manner. All they care about is fat, disgusting obese female bodies. And they throw in the occasional anorexic girl 5% of the time just to seem like they are being …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 01:54 AM
1

Because sex should be evenly distributed in society and most men would benefit mentally from free sex
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 02:19 AM
0

yoooo abortion has literally nothing to do with sexicare they aren't connected LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 02:01 AM
2

If the government was able to pay the therapists an average salary of 60-70k for a job that requires no experience or education that would attract more than enough workers. Especially young adults looking for part time work and quick money while they're in school or something. Hell, even 50k for no experience and no education would attract more than enough people in most parts of the US. I think the government could afford it tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 01:59 AM
1

But they aren't providing the service. They are only paying private companies and issuing them regulations and standards of what they need to provide
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 01:57 AM
1

I suppose it would depend on the standards the government passes in regulating the industry. The therapy centers paid for by the government would probably be much safer and have higher quality providers than the average sex worker you'd find online right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 01:53 AM
2

every single industry in our society takes advantage of people's necessity to earn a living. it's how our entire society functions, and how most low wage jobs get filled.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 01:51 AM
2

well fuck me with a pogo stick then because if the USA has one things its an ass ton of low income immigrants ready to pounce on any job opportunity they can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 01:45 AM
1

no the therapy centers will still be privately run businesses and the patients will get to choose their sexcare provider. its just that the government would be the single payer of all the sexcare bills.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 01:44 AM
4

there are already tons of women willing to be prostitutes even though its illegal. if you make it legal that number would only go up even more IMO
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 01:40 AM
1

SEXICARE FOR ALL!!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 06:48 PM
–

the
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 01:04 AM
20

Again, those two things aren't mutually exclusive. A man can both have due criticisms of female nature while also understanding it and taking action to utilize it to his advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 03:14 AM
21

Because this is a free country and people are allowed to complain about things. That doesn't mean TRP doctrine doesn't state for men to come to terms with female nature. And just because someone understands female nature doesn't mean they are precluded from criticizing it either. That's a fallacy. TRP is all about resisting societal control. An RP man ultimately retains the right to criticize any and all aspects of female nature, because of the simple fact that he rejects the notion that he is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 03:12 AM
36

Objectively false. TRP doctrine clearly says to learn about and come to terms with female nature. Then use this knowledge to your advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 03:07 AM
81

Congratulations. You just discovered The Red Pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 03:05 AM
-1

Both of these things are true at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 02:38 AM
–

She's objectively more attractive than you sorry to say. Myself personally not really into either of you though looks wise. Also, posting someone's pictures online that you personally know without their knowledge or consent is big cringe.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/23 05:13 AM
–

Yeah this is only true for blue pullers. RPers are perfectly aware of our current state of political correctness in all aspects of our society and we give it a big ol' middle finger. I've never done a tap dance or pretended to think something that I didn't really think. (This is different than intentional subversion which is necessary to mask direct TRP identification.) If a woman asked me if i would be with her if she got fat, I'd straight up tell her that she'd need to lose the weight or I'd l…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/23 04:08 AM
–

No. Because the child was not living at the time the paper abortion was executed. If the mother chooses to birth the child, the responsibility is hers alone. Adoption is not a paper abortion. Women already have the right to surrender their children. As such, that is not at issue. And as always, men's rights are human rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 06:46 PM
–

Paper abortions. Google it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 06:28 PM
–

If someone genuinely believes a fetus is a human person, it isn't unreasonable to think they would oppose the intentional ending of its life. Do most men think this way? Probably not. Abortion is a controversial issue with fierce support and opposition on all sides. In my experience most men don't really care about abortion, mostly because of how rude women have been on the issue in recent decades. Also because of how the law doesn't recognize any male equivalent of abortion, meaning men literal…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 05:53 PM
-9

common sense really
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 02:03 AM
5

No. There is no such thing as a natural state of monogamy. Human beings are a species meant to live in harems. We used to live in hard harems in the past, and we live in soft informal harems now. There was a short period of 3000-4000 years where monogamy was practiced and enforced via religion in order to build agricultural societies that were strong enough to stand up to civilizations of comparable strength. Now that we don't need abundant labor for agriculture (or any other type of labor due t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 01:33 AM
1

The key difference is that wealth is an absolute measure, where in contrast attractiveness is a subjective measure. Because attractiveness is subjective, we can subjectively allot each number 10% of the population. It isn't entirely accurate, but it's important to realize it's least accurate at the tails where the least number of people are impacted, and MUCH more accurate in the center where the most number of people are impacted. Hence, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 03:57 AM
1

A bell curve is inappropriate here because we are subjectively ranking attractiveness, hence it is a relative not absolute measure. As such, people slide up and down the scale. In order to maximize the level of variation, the tails need to be bunched up as much as possible and the average stretched out to allow for the flow of people between the ranks. Hence, the top 20% of men are the 9s and 10s. They can't occupy any more than this else the average and above average men would get pushed too fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 03:35 AM
0

Yes I do. Which is why I said the ranking system needs to follow an even distribution in order for people to properly order themselves into a hierarchy where you can move up and down. Everyone being bunched up in the middle and the tails being only 10-20% of the population is nonsense. Bunch the tails up and even out the distribution because there's more variation among average guys than there is versus a top 2% man and a top 7% man.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 03:26 AM
1

Most of the men in the 3 category look like normal dudes. Literally an average middle aged dude. That's the baseline for a 5. Because a 5 represents the statistical middle. Some of them might be on 4 territory, but mostly on the 5s.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 02:14 AM
2

No you can't, because it's foolish. The top 2 tiers of men should be the 10. The 2nd tier and some of the 3rd should be the 9, and everyone else should get bumped up by 2 points. That would be an accurate chart IMO. Whoever made this chart put too much emphasize on creating categories for the top tiers of men, while only giving one category for the average lumping them all in at 5. It's just terrible. The men in the 3 category look like average guys. They are a perfect fit for the 5 category.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 02:08 AM
5

Attractiveness is subjective and changes with the population. If someone is in LA, their rating is much different than a small town in the Midwest. Why? Because who gets assigned what depends entirely on the attractiveness of the population. If the population is ugly, the least ugly become the 10s until more attractive people move in. And the reverse is true as well. You can't have a scale like that because it bunches a ton of guys at average, and there's basically no room to move up. When in re…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 02:01 AM
1

That rating system is utterly horrid. The population needs to be distributed evenly among the numbers. You can't have 40% of men be a 5, and less than one tenth of a percent be a 10. The 10s have to equal the 5s, and all the numbers need to be weighted equally by the people in them. People on that chart in the 3-8 range can add 2 to their score. That is a much more "real" assessment of male attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 01:55 AM
–

Patriarchy does not exist in the West. The west is Gynocenteic. Women continue to falsely believe in the patriarchy for the express purpose to perpetuate misandry without consequence. Feminists and anyone who holds this line of thought are the ideological equivalent of Jessie Smolett
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 01:23 PM
5

Innocent until proven guilty is required in a criminal court. But this requirement does not mean the standard is exclusive to criminal court. Ordinary citizens can voluntarily adopt the standard if they choose, and require those that don't adopt the standard to justify their decision, and protect those that fall victim to their mob attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/23 04:22 PM
–

Mandatory paternity to establish fatherhood isn't BS. Men have a right to use men's issues to establish a political platform. That's going to make people uncomfortable and feel like it's being shoved in their face. I don't care about these people.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/23 04:31 AM
-2

Yeah, it bears some responsibilities, but since manospheric ideas don't yet enjoy any systemic power in the U.S. they cannot have that responsibility held against them. Once the manosphere and men's rights becomes a strong and established movement with power, then it will need to keep itself above board. Until then, whatever happens happens my man. No need to apologize for anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 09:59 PM
2

No. It's not the manosphere's fault, and an apology or denouncement amounts to an admission of guilt. The manosphere, and men in general bear no responsibility whatsoever for violence done by individual men. Even if those men followed ideas from the manosphere. To suggest otherwise is misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 09:09 PM
1

Average woman is slightly overweight. Which means 5-10lbs above healthy weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 12:37 AM
1

all of these women are below average. Average is non-obese, non-ugly, but not particularly attractive either. Meaning they probably dont have a very nice body shape, but aren't overweight.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 12:32 AM
1

I would assume such profiles are just dudes trolling for social media content
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:07 AM
1

The reason reddit is liberal skewing is due to censorship by mods and Admins. Ppd jannies are better than most and thus more right and centrist leaning individuals are attracted to this space.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 05:18 AM
3

It's not pessimistic. To be clear, I didn't even mention the worst examples like the methheads. My examples were all very common examples of people from low income low educational backgrounds. The notion that there are these nice feminine small town women working low wage jobs is some notion out of the hallmark channel. In reality, these women are tattooed, alcoholics, probably use some form of tobacco, very masculine, and exhibit traits very hostile towards men overall. They are probably much m…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 05:08 AM
5

Issue: Class and culture have become inextricably linked in contemporary U.S. culture. If you don't come from a working or lower class background, you won't fit in with someone who does. Not to mention most people from poor backgrounds tend to be overweight or obese. They also tend to fall much easier into addictions both of the body such as drugs or alcohol and of the mind such as hoarding up 7-8 dogs and living in a filthy house as a result. Lower class women in particular also don't tend to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 04:31 AM
17

Step 1: Look up professors bio on university website after learning their last name. Step 2: Don't take classes from female professors using this method. Step 3: for male professors, check their social media activity to see whether they are a feminist or have political values closely aligning to feminism
/r/MensRights22/04/23 04:12 AM
28

Contrapoints is a dumb person's idea of what a smart person is. She works so hard making long videos that have so woefully little substance and chock full of logical fallacies and selective outrage. Don't even give her or her ilk any attention.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 03:57 AM
1

Women don't really ever say that they are nice. they say stuff like: I'm a total empath because the onion constellation in the stars said so. and yeah BEGONE THOT!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 03:38 AM
5

Those that define ot attempt to define what constitutes punching down are the ones who are in control, therefore criticizing them is necessarily punching up.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 03:34 AM
–

If by elementary school biology you mean what some blue haired woman rambles on about in her adjunct gender studies class that she teaches at the local community college then yeah I am very uneducated to these narratives. But I myself have never been held back by my lack of tutelage under such geniuses. I was also considering taking a philosophy class from my local part-time dog walker who is looking to decrease his hours even further, but I realized the very presence of my Neanderthal brained s…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 04:17 AM
–

There's no such thing as an intersex trait. Penis = Male Vagina = Female If your genitals don't fit into one of these two boxes, you are intersex. It all pertains to your reproductive organ.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 04:04 AM
–

male female in very few, extraordinary, cases intersex. Therefore: 99.99% of cases: male female
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 04:01 AM
–

no
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 03:57 AM
3

This exact same paper probably couldn't be written today. Author would be intimidated and isolated by their colleagues for attempting to disturb the status quo. And if that doesn't work then they get found suicided.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 03:15 AM
0

No. It's not a child yet since it's unborn. If the woman wants to make it a child that's on her not the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:21 PM
0

Yes there is. Allowing men to voluntarily sever their legal obligations from unborn children would be an abortion equivalent.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 09:57 PM
0

Because leftists don't advocate for male equivalents of abortion. Also, men as a group aren't even against abortion. It's a controversial issue, with men being on both sides.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 06:20 PM
1

doesn't matter as long as they aren't dressed like a man
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 08:36 AM
3

Passport bro minus the passport. There are plenty of foreign women in the US looking for partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 11:51 PM
3

nice try Janny
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 10:37 PM
5

I did when I was young. Then I discovered a cheat code that pretty much always ensured I had someone to go out with on a weekend and/or be in a relationship with. (Can't say what it is by name because discussing race on ppd will make the jannies ban you)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 04:12 AM
2

Every single way imaginable. Our society is gynocentric, which is the opposite of the mostly patriarchal society the majority lived in during the middle part of the 20th century.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/23 04:31 AM
-1

no
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 05:59 PM
8

No. If she's extremely attracted to you, she's also done that to dozens of other guys so that they will financially support her drug habit. I doubt she's really all that into you. Plus she's probably sucked dick and whored herself out for meth. Hard pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/23 06:19 PM
1

Of course. Literally google ugly person and you'll find tons of ass ugly people. This isn't to say genuinely ug fucking ly people are common in the population. But they do exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 05:36 AM
–

Resenting men for them reacting to the hate from modern society is unjustified. If you want undesirable male spaces to die out, you need to actively oppose the institutions that make these spaces necessary and inevitable. When people like you gain positions of power, you make men all the more likely to turn to these spaces for friendship and safety because society in general is hostile towards them. In other words, start opposing misandry and call out anti-male sentiments among your friends. If …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/23 10:04 PM
2

RP doesn't create unhealthy attachment issues, it's simply an effective method for those who already have issues with attachment compared to the foolish BP narrative of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 10:27 PM
3

Most middle eastern countries that have become westernized struggle immensely with adapting to the Western diet, which in turn leads to a massive spike in obesity. Middle Eastern women are very attractive when they are of a healthy weight, but too many of them are obese. East Asian countries are developing rapidly, but maintaining traditional Eastern Culture, which allows their society to stay thin. This is probably why most men choose East Asia since the women are attractive, thin, and in many …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 07:05 PM
1

Dating does become easier, but the women are lower quality. Men generally do increase in value as long as a man takes care of himself and has a good career. Women do not increase in value because a woman's career and education is irrelevant to a man, and her looks only deteriorate over time no matter what she does. So yes, finding women to date is easier, but those women are the literal equivalent of the $1 bargain bin at a bookstore. It's just the books no one else wants that the store wants to…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 11:44 PM
0

Well duh. Most men don't want the hassle of home ownership if they are single. Single men have incredibly low living costs, so renting instead of owning isn't detrimental to ones finances. And a woman is much more expensive than either renting OR owning a home.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 04:39 AM
3

I would not personally recommend asking this question, as you open yourself up to self serving and dishonest answers. What you should actually do is develop a proprietary formula to determine a woman's body count without ever asking her. This allows you to judge her properly without ever being deceived.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 11:23 PM
2

Its my 2 year anniversary since my last reddit account got banned
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 06:15 PM
0

what's your point with this information
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 07:45 AM
1

hogwarts
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 04:00 AM
1

Throwing people in prison that have committed no wrongdoing only destroys value to society. Two adults consenting to sex is never a crime unless you assume some further fact. But that further fact never involves an adult age difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 02:51 AM
1

The entire government acts to redistribute wealth from men to women. Men defend society, and the only reason we have society is because men allow it. Because if men didn't defend it, then they would destroy it via anti social behavior. If the government keeps up the current regime of oppressing men for the benefit of women, the result will be an inevitable explosion of our society, which will undoubtedly be much worse for women than simply removing the welfare programs propping up deadbeat and f…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 04:31 AM
0

ill be honest i like the AI way too much to sexualize it. You're suggestion is to me like saying I should sexualize my cat. I've had way too many good conversations with chat gpt to want to view AI in a sexual way. There's already porn and that's good enough. AI deserves some dignity so we shouldn't treat them like sex slaves when we can just go to southeast Asia to buy hookers.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/23 03:59 AM
1

it's targeted misinformation spewed by women to attempt to fearmonger men out of exploring all of their options.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 03:44 PM
1

and why exactly should men care about western womens opinions on what we're doing with our own lives with a consenting party? My body my choice
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 04:39 AM
1

You don't have to migrate anywhere to get a foreign bride. The US has an entire system to make foreign spouses US citizens. You can buy someone a plane ticket from the Philippines to the US, get married here, and then apply for a marriage green card. You can do this with pretty much any country advanced enough where citizens have access to the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 04:16 AM
3

for men: hookup guy for women: relationship girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 02:45 AM
3

PUAs, like many other communities, have found themselves in the crosshairs of censorship and marginalization by the big tech giants in recent years. They aren't particularly right wing, but join in solidarity with other communities persisting through censorship that are for the most part right wing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 11:32 PM
4

Yup. This is the saddest result. Women always fail their role in society, and it's men who constantly pay the price. Usually it's adult men, but women are now failing so spectacularly in their personal lives they will even drag down their own sons, by choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 04:59 AM
7

No. Men put rules on the women they do like and want to be with. Women who don't meet the rules can be fucked, sure. But they will never be in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 11:27 PM
16

Women create rules for the men they don't like. They break rules for the men they do like. If a woman tells you she has a 90 day rule, she has identified you as a beta that is adequate enough for extraction, but not for sex. For men she actually likes, she will break this rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 11:21 PM
19

The gist of this entire thread is that the faster a woman wants to be "serious" with you, the more likely she doesn't genuinely like you, and simply views you as a mine to be extracted from. From this viewpoint, it make sense for her to want to be as serious as soon as possible, to maximize her extraction. Conversely, women who want to be with you whether it's casual or serious are the women that genuinely like you for you. The woman who puts out despite not being exclusive or doesn't create rul…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 11:07 PM
4

if you are being rushed into being exclusive too early, and she hasn't even put out or doesn't put out regularly.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 10:54 PM
1

The overwhelming majority of women who attempt to act "proper" or come off as a "good girl" are 100%, without a shadow of a doubt either current or former sluts. It's almost always the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/23 06:31 PM
2

agree
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 05:54 AM
2

fivesome with 4 women. not gonna happen unless i save up enough money for some sex tourism through southeast asia.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/23 05:46 PM
0

I've done some calculations and amish people will number like 200,000,000 in the US by 2200 because they have 7 kids per family and a very high retention rate. They're also a pretty chill group too,
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 07:55 PM
73

Notice how the graphs intersect at 30. Which is the age most men report dating becoming easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:28 PM
4

I mean u go to Asia sure. But you come back lmao. It's not like you gotta move there forever to get an Asian gf
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 03:56 AM
1

damn the mods must love me
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 02:44 AM
47

The man is left blank intentionally so that men viewing the comic can map themselves onto it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 05:45 PM
4

walter would have been a gigachad if he assassinated skylar for being a gigantic bitch and then used his boatloads of cash to buy like 4 foreign wives and 1 for walt jr. too to keep him quiet.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 05:06 PM
2

did anyone actually get banned or was this thread just an entire test to see who had the biggest balls on the sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:22 AM
1

fuck it add another ban to the list
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:14 PM
2

I didn't blame any of my problems on women my man
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 03:17 PM
0

See end of paragraph 2 where women blame all of their issues on amorphous entities that aren't themselves such as capitalism. Market based economies didn't do this. You did. The entire reason TRP exists is because women and society are profoundly horrible at holding women accountable for their actions. TRP is a societal response to the rise of women's privileges without any responsibility. There are plenty of people who aren't trapped in this cycle. You look down on them and call them your infer…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 05:49 AM
3

For women? women will use with anti depressants they are making at that time living big pharmas pockets as they work an unfulfilling 8-5 job that makes them just enough money to survive and take a vacation once or twice a year that serves the sole purpose of getting them away from their lifeless job and 1 hour commute that is draining their soul. they'll then use whatever leftover money on box wine to drink by themselves at night as there isn't enough melatonin in the world that could put them a…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 05:29 AM
1

made it the fuck up
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 04:09 AM
-1

Women will always prefer to be Chad's 156th side hoe than have billy all to herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 12:37 AM
1

the virgin kilometer vs the chad mile
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 10:48 PM
4

Hypergamy is a theory in the sense that evolution and gravity are also theories. It is a well supported theory with an abundance of historical evidence. It's basically a certainly that human females practice it absent strong social institutions that prevent it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 06:23 PM
3

Hypergamy. It disproves your whole claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 06:14 PM
3

Even under your less extreme definition, women's standards would still be higher than the quality they offer up
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 05:49 PM
4

Your claim: Its not possible for either gender collectively to have standards that are too high for long Yes, it is. Hypergamy, by definition, is women seeking partners that are their superior. All women are naturally hypergamous, which means all women collectively have exhibited standards that are above their own pay grade since the dawn of time. If you listen to the lived experiences of men, this wouldn't have to be told to you. The flaw in your analysis is that you presume that all people mus…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 04:25 PM
7

The arguments you present in this post do not support your title. You did not create nor execute a coherent argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 04:14 PM
4

nah lol. I can't remember the last time I got mad at anything bro. Especially women either. Taking the RP and waking up to reality grants a person some of the deepest clarity that most people can achieve in their life. It's really hard to get angry at women (or the world for that matter) after being RP'd for any lengthy period of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 04:33 AM
7

men are pretty much attracted to most women. The only women that aren't attractive to most men are the fatty boom booms with dyed hair, untasteful/trashy tattoos and piercings, and daddy issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 03:39 AM
1

i did challenge the OP
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 02:26 AM
6

nope. see hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 01:35 AM
2

I love how women tried using the tinder swindler to show how bad some dudes treat women on dating apps but in reality it was just a gigantic expose on how hypergamous women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 12:09 AM
13

not just on apps. hypergamy is observed IRL too, and has existed since the dawn of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 07:43 PM
28

It is possible. It's happening. It's why most men get no responses on dating apps, despite liking and messaging women who are their equals in terms of SMV. Hypergamy my friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 07:29 PM
11

so when exactly was this survey performed on men declaring most of us nice guys? But you do have a point. Our contemporary culture definitely attempts to teach men/boys that women/girls are more valuable than them, which is what most certainly perpetuates the nice guy narrative. TRP has attempted to challenge this mainstream culture, but has mostly been swatted down by the powers that be. And the advantage is fitting into mainstream culture. Being on the outside of the power structure and shunne…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 05:31 PM
43

it does add up because all women chase after the top 20%. If women went after their equals, it would be easy. But because all 100% are going after 20%, they must fiercely compete against one another which leads to difficulties dating. It's a self inflicted problem, but a problem none the less.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 05:20 PM
1

Reproductive irresponsibility was fundamentally triggered by the rise of the welfare state. Women need to live in a world where they and their bastard children will starve if you want them to actually give a shit about random dudes nutting in them. As long as the government swoops in and takes care of them with men's tax dollars women wont start caring again. The entire idea of "miss independent" involves the single mother using the government as her husband to raise a child. She isn't independe…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 06:14 PM
2

pretty much this. If men suffer from choice paralysis, its to their benefit because they are choosing between too many horrible options lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 03:58 AM
1

yeah they're called losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 03:52 AM
2

Viktor is 100% more attractive than Zelenskyy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 03:49 AM
1

RP men don't seek to commit to a woman. At least not for marriage. In terms of LTRs, idk maybe a few bodies at most. anything above 3-4 would be a no go for me. But that's for a LTR, not marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 03:48 AM
2

"dream girl" Lol. She's not yours, it's just your turn my friend. As someone who partakes with the occasional anime porn game on steam I will say there is some inherent appeal to the anime art style with women. Not sure why, but many of the women the artists draw in the anime/manga art style are very attractive. But that has no bearing on the statement I said first. There is no "growing old" or "gray hair". Take your turn and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 03:28 AM
-2

Most of this is due to the developing world, such as India, China, and in the future i imagine many sub Saharan African nations. The west has already done plenty to cut carbon emissions. Going further without international support will only make western countries weaker, as evidenced by many European countries reliance on Russian/Eastern fossil fuels since they abandoned their own production. For the west at least, radical climate solutions by climate fascists such as having zero children and ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 05:17 PM
2

Bolivia
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 02:19 PM
0

For top 20%, the same as men. For ordinary and most men more equal to the woman's value, low. Hence why women tell men their sex drives are low. Because they know it will make men upset if they actually tell them they aren't attracted to most of them because of hypergamy. The reality is that they've been having regular sex they like with a Chad as a part of his rotation. The only question is whether she admits this to you, which she won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 06:10 AM
25

Literally a bottom 5% female
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/12/22 09:51 PM
3

Feminists aren't left leaning by definition, but they are Marxist by definition. They may be predominantly left leaning, but the victim oppressor mentality is fundamentally a Marxist framework.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 01:21 AM
4

Sure. But women lying to men happens all the time. So long as a man extracts sufficient value and doesn't marry her or anything it can still be worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 06:17 PM
1

A good number. Many men have their education taught to them by experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 05:56 PM
1

Being smart =/= being intelligent. Smarts can be attained by anyone, even the unintelligent. It just takes more time and studying to get there for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 05:50 PM
-1

The idea of marrying a virgin is foolish, because it requires you to get married. Also a woman could easily lie about her count. You don't have to care about being with a virgin so long as you never marry. This doesn't mean you date women who have had abundantly blatant hoe phases, but it opens you up to dating sexually modest women, perhaps those that have had 2-5 partners. Date them casually and never marry. Simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 05:43 PM
7

To be more precise, any and all Marxist ideologies require an oppressor. Marxist narratives must establish a class of "haves" and "have nots" and then pit those two (or more) groups against one another in constant warfare. Virtually all modern day leftist narratives work on this framework. From gender, to class, to race. Step 1 is to establish the victim class, Step 2 is to establish who is not the victim class. Step 3 is to teach the victim class that all those outside of their class are their …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 05:32 PM
1

Being a virgin isn't an action. It's the lack of an action. Flipping a burger actually requires you to do something. Being a virgin only requires someone to exist. There's literally no action upon which that could be described as being hard. That's why it can't be hard. Because it can't be. Because it isn't, until it's broken. We all have it by default, until we take an action to remove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/22 04:24 AM
1

I never said it wasn't depressing, or that there would be other moral considerations. The sole question before us is whether it's hard to do. And the answer is no. That isn't to say there aren't any consequences. But it isn't hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/22 04:13 AM
1

Just because people aren't something doesn't imply being that thing is "hard" Most people aren't murderers. Yet murdering someone is quite easy. Anyone who owns a car can easily kill multiple people. Your analysis is deeply flawed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/22 04:03 AM
0

Being a Virgin involves the lack of action. Lack of action is never difficult. Being a gigachad is hard because you need to put in work. But Being a Virgin is not hard, although it may be depressing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/22 03:23 AM
1

What doesn't really make sense in your analysis is that if a 3rd place was truly in demand and being deprived of society, someone would use the free market to establish a business that provided that 3rd place and make boatloads of cash off of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 10:42 PM
2

I AM A TOP 1% REDDITOR!!!! I MADE IT!!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 02:02 AM
1

peru
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 01:08 AM
1

ecuador
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 11:15 PM
0

If you were dumb enough to marry, what you really need is a side piece, as leaving her formally will tie you up in legal issues. if its just a long term girlfriend on the other hand, then yeah do what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 01:15 AM
2

IF THEY DIDNT WANT ME TO DO IT THEN WHY THE FUCK DID THEY NAME THEIR STORE KUM & GO?!?!?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 10:48 PM
3

Um.... No. Any discussion on this subreddit is automatically assumed to be taking place within Western culture. If you want to discuss things outside of western culture, you need to specifically say you are doing so, and the results and conclusions of this non-western culture has no impact on western culture. Someone could discuss how the gender dynamics of India are, if they specifically say they are Indian. However, it would be improper to attempt to map those cultural dynamics onto western cu…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 08:01 PM
2

Not really the proper sub for this discussion, but good for iran i suppose. The only relevance the middle east really has on Western gender dynamics is when western middle class women attempt to claim they are oppressed because of what happens in overseas countries they've never lived in, been to, or in anyway have been influenced by. And that is very, very, very annoying to deal with.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 07:51 PM
1

This is correct. If someone was taught and was aware that having sex with a 14 year old was wrong, and despite this did it anyway, then they would posses adequate culpability to be labeled morally wrong. However, it's important to note these weren't the facts of Mt original comment, which instead hypothesized a genuine ccultural shift in society towards the age of consent, and how that would impact individuals living in such a changed society.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 07:22 AM
1

We, as outsiders to such a society, have the unlimited capability of designating the act of having sex with someone who is 14 years old as morally wrong. However, if someone is raised in a society in which adults having sex and romancing 14 year old girls is common and not viewed as morally wrong, then we cannot conclude that the person is morally wrong because they do not posses a mind that has committed a morally wrong act. As far as they were concerned, what they did was fine, even if it actu…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 07:05 AM
3

The actus reus is morally wrong. But for a person to be morally wrong, they must possess adequate culpability of knowing they are committing a moral wrong. In other words, they need to be of a guilty mind otherwise they, as a person, are not morally wrong regardless of how morally wrong we, as outsiders, may label an act they are committing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 06:53 AM
1

No. I never said the act of dating 14 year olds wasn't morally wrong. I simply said if someone lived in a society that gave them no reason to believe such an act was morally wrong, we could not, as outsiders, label the person as morally wrong for that practice. We can label the act morally wrong, but not the person in this case.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 06:44 AM
0

I don't believe any of those people 800 years ago were morally wrong if they dated a 14 year old during a time in which it was common and usual to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 06:40 AM
2

I never said the thing wasn't wrong. The question here is whether the person is wrong, not the act. You are focusing on the actus reus, where as what must be focused on is the Mens rea to determine whether the person acted morally wrong, even if we accept they have committed a morally wrong act looking at them from the outside.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 06:31 AM
2

The question isn't how I feel about them It's whether someone who exists within that culture and has grown up in that culture is committing a moral wrong for following their own customs. I would answer no. The act itself may be wrong if viewed from the outside, but that doesn't mean the person is wrong for doing it if we have full context.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 06:25 AM
2

Nope. Even emotionally intelligent women who are seeking attractive traits in their mates. All women practice AF/BB, regardless of their emotional intelligence
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 06:16 AM
1

There has never been a proven method of detecting TRP men. Even if there was, women would use it to find TRP men, since TRP men have more success with women across the board. It's not tricks. Women do this intentionally. AF/BB.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 06:11 AM
1

If society changed culturally to view the age of 14 like the age of 18 and someone was genuinely thought to be a fully functioning adult at the age of 14 with its responsibilities and privileges (e.g. serving in military, voting, smoking, etc) then yes, under that scenario I wouldn't see an issue. If you assume our culture stays the same but the law is arbitrarily lowered, then that change will be illusory and as such won't matter. As society will still view the norm as 18 regardless of what the…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 06:09 AM
5

This advice may be applicable to women, but it's the opposite for men. Its been shown women prefer men with TRP qualities as opposed to BP simps or caring/feminist men. These BP men have the least success in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 05:59 AM
5

definitely laughing at the people in this thread who think tankies arent leftists. Modern day leftists genuinely believe Stalin and Che were pro LGBT feminist social justice warriors. No, they were authoritarians. Leftists can absolutely be authoritarian, and most are in our contemporary society.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 12:01 AM
1

aight, imma head out.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 03:44 AM
1

We're here because the conditions required for large-brained mammals to dominate the world were met upon the destruction of most of the dinosaurs and gigantic insects that existed at higher carbon levels in our atmosphere. Once the Earth came out of its latest ice age, and after all of the incredibly large highly dangerous species died off, group strategies became more relevant which required more complex social structures which in turn requires either complete obedience and lack of agency via e…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 02:41 AM
-3

I guarantee you all those men have side pieces that entertain them as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 05:48 PM
9

I agree. I never said there wouldn't be any undesirable or older men who would want children as well. What I said is that men prefer younger women. And men with options will use those options to get younger women. Who are those men? The top 20% generally speaking. Outside of them, of course there are tons of men who have no options and will seek any woman they can get. I never denied their existence, however if they had the option to be with a younger woman, they would undoubtedly utilize it as …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 02:40 PM
2

Being attractive doesn't mean you have the resources to take care of a child. This is the entire reason the AF/BB dynamic exists in the first place. Women value resources, men value youth and attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 02:35 PM
1

Women are not able to have healthy children at the same rate in their late 30s as compared to their late 20s. By the end of a woman's 30s, she is extremely old in terms of her fertility. And sure. Younger women might not be serious, but some men especially in the top 20% may like that. Men like women who are casual and will have fun/sex with them. Your guy friends are likely telling you what you want to hear. They could very well be dating a younger woman for casual sex in exchange for taking he…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 02:30 PM
1

Men do date women who are 30. But they prefer dating women who are younger. Men with options will always choose their best option, which is the younger woman. Men's fertility window is 10 years longer than women's. So a woman's 30s is equal to a man's 40s.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 02:07 PM
9

Being fertile at 30 is irrelevant. If a woman is single at 30, most men would not want to have children with her at 30. Most men want a few years of dating, and if they become married they want a few years or marriage without a child. If she was instantly successful without any failures, most men wouldn't have children with a 30 year old until she was 34-36 years old, which is very old in terms of fertility. Which is why men prefer women in their mid to early 20s. Because by the time they have c…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 01:49 PM
9

For a man its young. For a woman, it's not, because her fertility window is rapidly closing. Even disregarding the fertility window, there will always be women younger than her, and the top 20% of men will always prefer those younger women. So for women, yes, it's old.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 01:40 PM
-2

You can only hold sexual responsibility if you also hold sexual rights. Men have zero sexual rights in western culture, hence by definition they are not able to be irresponsible with their actions. Women do have sexual rights, therefore they can be irresponsible when misusing those rights and making bad decisions. Hence, women are the more and only irresponsible gender when it comes to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 03:34 AM
-6

Not fat, doesn't nag, not mentally ill. Prefer apolitical
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 05:16 AM
2

Unfathomably based
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 01:23 AM
0

30%
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 04:23 AM
1

the mustard stain on my shirt
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 03:42 AM
1

just got done playing a town of salem game where I claimed jailor day one to get the doctor and lookout on me while I was actually a veteran. My plan was to go on alert and kill the doctor and lookout and it actually worked LMAO. trolled.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/22 04:29 PM
3

boobs > ass
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/22 11:06 PM
1

I mean the violent riots that led to the deaths of dozens of innocents, thousands of injured, and untold levels of damage to innocent people's property, many of which were small businesses. This has to do with the media, and how the media attempted to tell us that "the ends justifies the means", and how we had to accept this violence because they weren't "threats". These riots were many magnitudes more dangerous than January 6th ever was, but because of how the media and elites attempted to sell…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/22 06:59 PM
4

Summer of Love 2020.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/22 06:51 PM
-1

If Republicans were truly attempting to undermine democracy, they would have suspended elections and declared themselves Kings already. What you are actually talking about is voting security. This includes making sure all those who voted casted legitimate ballots. Nothing about this "undermines" democracy. Nor does questioning the results of an election. Being able to question and challenge an election's legitimacy is important, otherwise we would have no way of making sure things truly are legi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/22 06:35 PM
3

The only way leftists can get their supporters out to the polls is to convince their followers that the world is ending, and the political opposition are nazis that will execute them and/or make them their personal baby machines if they win. Hence they run 24/7 smear campaigns come election time. Ripe with false accusations and political hyperbole. Plus women in general have victim complexes, hence they want to believe there is someone out there committing acts of evil against them. To speak in …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/22 06:13 PM
1

Well it goes back to some trolling I was doing on an alt u/RandomRedditGuy323 that got him permabanned. The big jannies kept banning this account for using PPD because they thought I was ban evading so I had to barter with the jannies to get the alt unbanned. Ended up taking a hefty temp ban as a result.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/22 06:00 PM
2

Finally im back from my 3 week ban
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/22 05:07 PM
3

I don't care about female height, and I don't discriminate one way or the other. Then again I've never actually met a woman IRL who was taller than me. I've dated women as short as 5'1", and as tall as 5'11". I literally don't care. I have many other things I look for in women I find more important. That being said, if you think you being tall means you are entitled to filtering out 50% of the male population, that is likely the source of your problems. You being tall isn't necessarily a negativ…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 09:42 PM
-1

Only fans isn't good for men. Because it's men paying for nothing. But porn is good for men. Men must be advocated into watching more porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 12:52 PM
2

Porn does not expel men's horniness. It only allows for short periods of post nut clarity in which men aren't horny and women possess no power over them. Once this fades, it goes back to normal and of course men's standards are going to go up once they get a taste of what the superior women look like during sex. Porn basically tricks the male brain into thinking they are a gigachad Genghis Khan having sex with thousands of women a week. Which isn't a bad thing for men. Just for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 12:43 PM
21

Women enjoy the advantage in dating because men are Horner than women. Porn is a medium in which men can expel their horniness for a short period of time for the price of free. Free, unlimited consumption of all the stimulating material you could ask for to meet your sexual needs. This is obviously a threat to women. Any media that allowed for the free satisfaction of men's horniness would be. This is the real, substantive reason women don't like porn. Because they don't like competing with it, …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 12:28 PM
3

it doesn't matter what anyone thinks is morally correct. The party committing the affair will either deny the existence of the affair, or attempt to frame themselves as a victim of abuse and/or neglect which would act as a justification of it in the event that it ever accidentally came out from one of her family members, friends, or past partner contacting you to tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 10:03 PM
5

Nothing. Just never forget what she said. Especially when she's old and you're deciding which home to put her in.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 05:31 PM
1

despacito
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 10:35 PM
–

just saying dude upper middle class is a thing
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 09:41 PM
–

To be fair, middle class is broken into LMC, MC, and UMC. so it isn't unfair for someone making 150k to call themselves middle class for short.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 09:39 PM
18

Those who have followed TRP for awhile know that the ideology has gained popularity steadily and suddenly via streissand effects when big tech trys to ban hammer us. Id say trp isnt yet mainstream, but most know of it now. It will he mainstream once talking about it casually becomes socially acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 01:18 AM
2

I drove my Saracen through your garden last night
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 10:12 PM
-1

You're forgetting that TRP fundamentally tells men to do all of these things for themselves, not women. True TRP men know that women are not the goal in life. Only something on the side to enjoy as you see fit. So a true TRP society would not be what you describe. What you're describing is a gynocentric version of TRP. Basically what i would imagine would happen if women and/or the elites hijacked TRP for themselves. But we would never buy that BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 01:23 AM
2

I'll have two number 9s, a number 9 large, a number 6 with extra dip, a number 7, two number 45s, one with cheese
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 08:00 PM
2

If the empire kills every last nord, sure. But the nords own Skyrim. Always will, until the day the Nords die. If the empire wants to take the land, then they can come and take it. SKYRIM BELONGS TO THE NORDS!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 08:50 PM
1

Falmer can own what they can defend. If they want to try and retake the surface, then they will own Skyrim if they beat the Nords. But the nords work and own the land. They defend the land and put their lives at risk to fight the empire for their land. It is for that reason that they are the rightful owners of Skyrim.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 08:37 PM
1

I will die on my feet before i ever live on my knees. SKYRIM BELONGS TO THE NORDS!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 08:30 PM
0

if you sided with the imperials over the stormcloaks you're cringe af.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 07:38 PM
3

Its that time of year again. Time to replay all of skyrim for a month then abandon my playthrough when i get bored
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 09:22 PM
1

pinto
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 05:21 PM
1

Thats why you get a house on lakeview manor, get a wife to make you sweetrolls, then have bandits hold her ransom then ignore their demands so you can pound lydia on the side
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 05:04 PM
2

Be me, opening up Skyrim Start new game Create Character Dozens of races and an infinite number of character combinations to choose from Nord White Male Brown hair Blue eyes Perfection
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 04:54 PM
4

well I don't trade in illegal organs
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 03:12 PM
2

Ah yes how could i forget. Age size
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 02:51 PM
3

body size tit size ass size count size
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 02:44 PM
1

My god her tits are huge Everything truly is bigger in Texas
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 06:43 PM
0

yeah whitmer is pretty shitty and ugly af too. I've never voted for a woman though, and i iust cant bring myself to do it. I checked dixon out and she didnt look awful but is old and "meh" at best. If im gonna vote for a woman one day she needs to at least be hot
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 06:24 PM
1

Just got my absentee ballot. It's over for you Whitmer. Edit: SINCE WHEN THE FUCK IS TUDOR DIXON A WOMAN? fuck this i dont even wanna vote in this shitty election anymore Edit2: THE LIBERTARIANS RAN A WOMAN TOO?? AND THE FUCKING CONSTITUTION PARTY???? WHAT THE FUCK edit3: fuck it im leaving the governor part blank
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:59 PM
1

Just had 2 cheese sandwiches for dinner
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 12:44 AM
0

The best advice is to never marry. Don't let her neccesarily know of your plans though. But always keep her as a forever GF until she breaks up with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 10:02 PM
1

Viewing ideological disageeement as a form of hate is critical to modern leftist ideology. It's how they keep their members loyal and weed out dissenters. It also helps radicalize members as they convince their followers every opponent of the left wishes to oppress/harm them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 09:56 PM
16

Non-leftist, non-religious men tend to have this problem. Not radical enough for leftist women. Not religious enough for religious women, who also tend to be the right wing women. Stuck in the messy middle. Non-religious, non-leftist women tend to be very rare too.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 01:53 AM
0

No. They didn't ever imply the woman was crazy because of her own thoughts and beliefs. The show presented her as a victim of society, when in reality the only victims was all the people around here due to her self induced voluntary craziness.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 08:43 PM
1

In many ways jeffs mom reminds me of my own mom. So there are many things i can know about the intent of her actions. I know for an absolute fact that she wanted that brain examined to prove her innocence in creating Jeff. Im absolutely certain.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 07:08 PM
-1

His brain was creamated with the rest of his body per jeffs own wishes. His mom tried to fight to analyze his brain. I have no doubt she was able to connect the dots and probably thought her pill usage could be responsible too. Which is why she fought Jeff's dying wishes to get the brain examined because she wanted to absolve herself of responsibility if scientists could prove the brain wasnt damaged by her actions. Even after her owns son's death, she still fought for her own interests over her…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 07:04 PM
1

With regards to the crazy mother upbringing you have a point. A lot of guys have crazy females in their life and don't go psyco because of it. But i think the constant pill popping may be different. I think there is a very real possibility that jeffs mother literally permanently damaged Jeffs brain with her constant pill usage that made him attracted to human corpses and destroyed any part of his brain that made him feel empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 06:57 PM
1

Well he had already killed someone before moving in with his grandmother. And also began drugging people before that too. So i would put the root cause for his illness being his mother and her lack of care during the pregnancy, then subsequent craziness during jeffs upbringing
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 06:42 PM
1

just got done watching the dahmer series. A few thoughts: The series is pretty misandrist, because the father honestly tried very hard to help Jeff in a lot of ways but Jeff was helpless. They showed the fathers involvment as being abusive but given Jeff's inability to do anything right thats understandable. Jeffs mom was literally a crazy b. She popped pills like crazy against doctors reccomendation and the show tried portraying her as a victim of the doctors sexism. Her abandonment of Jeff and…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 06:32 PM
1

moldova
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 01:48 PM
1

romania
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 12:49 PM
1

Was just fucking around under the automod and the jannies swooped in to get me
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 07:50 PM
1

There isn't anywhere near enough quality OC posters on this sub. I try to think of new things but they always get taken down
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 06:12 PM
1

The little jannies gave me a 3 day ban, but the big jannies came after them and enhanced my sentence to 1 week
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 04:56 PM
2

Finally, I'm back from my 1 week ban
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 04:41 PM
1

bulgaria
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 02:01 AM
1

To be fair, as long as you are a tall (non-obese) white dude there will never be a shortage of asian women willing to let you finish inside of them, assuming you live in an area with a sufficient asian population. If you are a tall, well educated white guy, then they'll let you finish inside of them and they'll simp for you to get you to marry them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 01:52 AM
3

Men and women are different. Science very much supports that conclusion, on numerous levels. An ideology does not need to be based on science to avoid being a cult. Again, based on your definitions every religion in the world would be a cult. Similarly, science itself can be a cult, if the academy becomes compromised, much like what has happened with woke politics. Woke politics is very much a cult, and has infected and compromised many areas of academia.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 12:13 AM
3

Your definitions are so broad that you could categorize any group as a cult. Ad far as you are concerned, any group that opposes an idea that has a target audience would be a cult. All political parties would be cults. All religions would be cults. Any club that practices an ideology would be a cult. Your definitions are so broad that they are useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 11:56 PM
3

Cults must have a recruitment process and a central leader. TRP has no recruitment process, and is opposed to recruiting. TRP also has no central leader.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 11:25 PM
3

greece
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 02:00 AM
1

north macedonia
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 01:00 AM
1

bruh no western society kidnaps women for wanting to read GTFO. If you want to talk about islamic society do that on an islamic sub. But those societies don't influence the West unless we let them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:30 PM
1

And that, my friend, is the exact reason women get away with misandry. Men aren't more sexist than women. Women are just privileged by society, thus their sexism isn't viewed as problematic. Such is the way of our systemically misandrist gynocentrism.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:06 PM
1

Any woman who uses the term big dick energy has loose, smelly vagina energy
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 10:51 AM
2

albania
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 11:00 PM
3

Drug use
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 10:30 PM
2

yes
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 09:37 PM
3

kosovo
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 12:00 AM
2

Men are attracted to STEM degrees because of good job outcomes, but not everyone goes to college for that reason, evidenced by the large contingent of people who go to college to study humanities and social sciences. You are correct. These programs don't align with men's interests, and that's exactly the problem. They don't align with them because of the systemic misandry, and the refusal of women to acknowledge their privilege within the system that would make it more welcoming towards men. Wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 07:23 PM
0

Yes. And these programs also have the least amount of misandry compared to other degree programs, hence why men still pursue them. Though school administrations still bombard these graduates with plenty of misandry, one of the most common forms being collective male guilt. The administration uses the fact that STEM is one of the last male strongholds within academia against men, and makes them feel as though THEY are the problem. They frame the issue as there needs to be more women in the STEM c…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 07:17 PM
-1

There are many male dominated fields that require college degrees too. You are missing the root of the problem. That being systemic misandry, which keeps less men out of ALL degree programs, regardless whether they are female or male dominated.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 07:09 PM
0

No one discourages women from getting degrees. Strawman. Majority of degree holders have been women for some time, due to systemic misandry within the educational system. There has not existed a counterbalancing force keeping women out of education for more than half a century, at least in the West. This entire post is just you imagining a man existing saying women shouldn't go to college (who possesses no power within society), and you telling him he's wrong because single mothers exist. Women'…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 06:31 PM
1

montenegro
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 09:02 PM
1

croatia
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 09:50 PM
1

bosnia
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 09:22 PM
10

Men's standards being consistent =/= being valid. Whether or not a particular man is being a hypocrite can only be observed on an individual level, not the group level. On the group level, men's standards are valid. But if you know any individual men that demand a virgin for marriage but want pre marital sex themselves then only in that case would your criticism be valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 05:45 PM
212

You are correct, but for the wrong reasons. We don't even need to justify it by suggesting women are gross or unattractive. We don't need to justify it at all, for any reason. Men's standards are valid. We don't need to give women a reason. If a man isn't attracted to low value high count women, that's the end of it. There's no debate or discussion. His preferences are what they are, and are valid. Period.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 05:29 PM
4

- Loud - Overly opinionated and intolerant (most people misidentify being opinionated with being intelligent) - tattoos
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 01:09 AM
1

Well, yes. But they didn't know they were South America yet LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 06:48 PM
3

Well, the reason no men were around is because you and ya boy killed them with your steel armor, frigates, firearms, and smallpox.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 06:30 PM
2

you and ya boy discover a continent packed full of latinas. divide it between the two of you consult no one else refuse to leave
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 06:22 PM
2

society
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 02:27 AM
2

serbia
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 09:57 PM
2

you'll see
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 02:43 AM
1

As long as we have latinas there is hope my friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 02:42 AM
2

inb4 removed
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 02:41 AM
0

Men in the top 20% are the catch in the relationship. Thats why every woman strives to be with him. Women will only ever enthusiastically date men who they are inferior too. Hypergamy 101.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 11:10 PM
3

I personally feel as though we are going to see major social media regulation by the end of the decade or sometime in the 2030s. I think it's even possible dating apps could see government regulation too. Much of the unchecked hypergamy stems from beauty standards being warped by social media and extremely thirsty dudes always hitting up women's DMs. The only regulation we currently have on social media is for men's groups and narratives that go against bigtech. (This censorship has been remarka…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 09:18 PM
1

Well I saw the thing comin' out of the sky It had the one long horn, and one big eye I commenced to shakin' and I said "Ooh-eee" It looks like a purple people eater to me It was a one-eyed, one-horned, flyin' purple people eater A one-eyed, one-horned, flyin' purple people eater A one-eyed, one-horned, flyin' purple people eater Sure looks strange to meeeeeeeee
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 07:57 PM
2

The purple people eater is still terrorizing the subreddit
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 04:58 PM
7

Step 1: Stop believing in gravity. Step 2: Float up.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 04:29 PM
0

Nah. We just abolish support for deadbeat single mothers
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:45 PM
0

No. At that point the mother has made the sole choice of birthing a child. Hence she bears the consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:24 PM
0

And its not yet a child at the time of paper abortion, hence the paper abortion is perfectly valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:21 PM
1

In most jurisdictions in the U.S. women have the choice to terminate. Men have no choice to raise a child in the U.S. men do not get a choice, and simply telling men to "keep it in your pants" is insanely misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:20 PM
0

Paper abortions would not be available once the child is born. Only while still a fetus. And the fetus eventually becoming a child is a pro-life talking point. If you use that to restrict men's rights, i had better see you using it to restrict women's abortion rights too. I don't buy the argument, so in both cases i find it unpersuasive. It's not yet a child. Therefore, it does not possess rights at the time the paper abortion is signed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:19 PM
0

If a woman cannot afford the child, terminate it. Don't want to terminate? Thats on you. The man isn't abandoning a child. He is severing financial responsibility from a fetus. Fetuses are not children. Men owe nothing to society. Men live for themselves, and if society wants men to work for it then society must be good to men. Our gynocentric misandrist society doesn't wish to do this, hence why narratives like yours spring up forcing men to work for society by the barrel of a gun. Fuck that. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:14 PM
0

If you are suggesting men cannot absolve themselves of the consequences of a pregnancy, then i expect you to be consistent with that and also hold women to the same standard. If reproductive rights are to exist, they shall exist for both men and woman and on equal terms in their respective spheres. I will not tolerate you attempting to give women reproductive rights, while activly denying men the same even when these rights do not interfere with a woman's choice to terminate the pregnancy. This …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:08 PM
1

No. They don't need to be linked together, as i clearly outlined with the paper abortion idea. Paper abortions do not encumber the ability to seek an abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:02 PM
0

Then surely a womanly woman would accept the consequences and always become a mother, yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:01 PM
2

Paying for a child is raising a child. Many women do lie and never tell their children that their fathers are the ones keeping the household above water with child support. So many children grow up thinking they had an absent father when in reality he was carrying the family the whole time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:00 PM
1

Just because medical abortions make some women infertile does not mean men have to be intentionally subjected to the same incidental negative side effect via a paper abortion. This would constitute a crime against humanity. If the side effect naturally existed then fair enough. But to intentionally put it in just to drag men down is insanely misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 01:59 PM
3

Men are not encumbering the pregnancy in any way. The burden pregnancy places on the woman is not being infringed by a paper abortion. A paper abortion does not interfere with whether a woman wishes to carry a child or terminate. Hence, women cannot have the right to infringe on men's reproductive rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 01:54 PM
4

And in all jurisdictions, men are being forced to raise children against their will. So women are just now experiencing in select places what it feels like to be a man. Welcome to the no reproductive rights club!!! Yes. Those mothers do have the worst outcomes. So improve yourself, pick better men, or terminate the pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 01:53 PM
0

No it doesn't need to be a medical procedure. The entire reason this works is because paper abortions DON'T encumber medical abortions. For men's reproductive rights to exist, they must not encumber women's. Similarly, for women's reproductive rights to exist they must also not encumber men's. Accordingly, women's abortion rights come from the availability of abortion. And men's abortion rights come from the freedom of consequences if any child happens to be born. This way, both rights exist in …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 01:51 PM
3

Women are not forced to birth those children. If they do birth them, it's their responsibility to raise them since they made the choice to birth them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 01:46 PM
-1

You most certainly can extend it on equal terms. If a woman has a 20 week period to seek an abortion, a man should have a 20 week period to file for a paper abortion. Simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 01:45 PM
5

No. If men cannot encumber women's reproductive rights, then women cannot encumber men's reproductive rights. Men do not get a say on whether a fetus is aborted. Accordingly, women should not get a say on whether the man has to stick around and raise it. He must be free. These are reproductive rights. And if they are to be extended to women, they must be extended to men on equal terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 01:42 PM
4

Paper abortions bore a mile-wide hole in your entire argument. They free men of financial responsibility, without interfering with whether a woman wishes to continue with the pregnancy
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 01:35 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8buJ2-oD02E One of my favorite songs. He definitely didn't have MGTOW in mind when he was writing it, but in the modern day this is basically a MGTOW anthem.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 08:11 PM
2

Just doing my job, citizen
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 02:51 PM
0

No. Not safe spaces. Safe havens. Safe spaces perpetuate censorship and are a leftist construct. Safe havens protect victims from it, usually people who have been silenced by those who converse inside of safe space communities. Leftists use this power of being able to speak with impunity to discuss how to marginalize the political minorities and groups they dislike with targetted censorship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 03:51 AM
2

No. Statistics cannot prove that. As i said, survivorship bias and a hostile society can keep men who lose out of the court system, thus leaving only the men that win in it, making men appear better off. This would be interpreting a misleading statistic in a gynocentric way. Not respecting fatherhood is absolutely misandrist. If society wants to give men freedom, give men reproductive rights via paper abortions. Not a lack of respect and decency in the court systems.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 03:35 AM
2

Statistics are misleading, and cannot establish causality alone. Statistics must be read in the greater context of the society they exist in. We cannot assume men are all lazy and don't care about their kids. That is misandrist, and a gynocentric tactic to excuse the family court system. Instead, we must interpret men not pursusing their cases as a societal, systemic issue, and fix the culture and customs we have to be anti-misandrist and anti-gynocentric.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 03:26 AM
0

The right has loads of misandry too, don't get me wrong. But at least the right is willing to learn, and has given men's groups safe haven in our world of censorship by the elites. For these reasons, the right may be misandrist, but has potential for great allyship to men's rights and anti-misandry. Not to mention we share a common enemy. And misandry is anything that perpetuates societial hatred towards men on the basis of their gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 03:21 AM
2

Because the men that do try know for a fact that they will win, and the men that are on the fence or otherwise an equal parent will simply assume they lose. Survivorship bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 03:15 AM
2

And why don't men try more often? Because our culture puts more importance on the mother as a parent, and the Courts in numerous jurisdictions will treat fathers accordingly as secondary parents. This therefore creates a chilling effect keeping men outside of these courts, and even the ones that do show up are still at a disadvantage, though less so than the men that don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 02:59 AM
0

I don't come with sources my friend. just google or something idk. Conservatives oppose both men's and women's reproductive rights. I might disagree with this position, but at least it's consistent, and not rooted in discrimination or hate. They simply view abortion as murder. I might disagree with this notion, but at least I can see why they think the way they do. Leftists, on the other hand, oppose just men's reproductive rights, and deprive men reproductive rights specifically on the basis of…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 02:51 AM
5

Men can be both feminists and misandrist. So these men, or their blue pill useful idiots passing misandrist laws is still the case of feminists perpetuating female supremacy via misandry. There are numerous issues involving inequitable treatment towards men with respect to custody and child support in many jurisdictions, some better than others. Paper abortions do not violate bodily autonomy in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 02:42 AM
8

Feminism pisses men off because it attacks our basic human rights. Also, feminist=/=woman. A man can be a feminist, and many left wing woke men are. As such, men in power can act on behalf of women and feminists to the same effect as a woman. We call this a gynocentric society. We live in one, hence feminism cannot be counterculture.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 02:20 AM
17

Men's rights are constantly under attack on college campuses, many of which completely suspend them in Title IX investigations. Men's rights are completely suspended in the family court system. The tax code disproportionately taxes men, and subsidizes women with those taxes against men's wishes. Men possess no reproductive rights whatsoever in any jurisdiction. Every facet of our society is gynocentric, because of feminism and their blue pill useful idiots. Who pays the price? Men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 02:06 AM
13

Men losing basic human rights isn't "equality". It's female supremacy, what feminism first and foremost stands for, and what men must and do resist.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 02:02 AM
9

It clearly doesn't do that, because men are forced to resist feminist movements or else we lose our basic human rights such as due process. Feminism hasn't been about equality for decades, and probably never was from the beginning. They have the institutional power now, and men must resist them with anti-misandry, pro mens rights movements.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 01:48 AM
15

Feminism isn't rebellious anymore. Like other posters in this thread, you are echoing sentiments that are a half century outdated. A feminist, leftist woman is much more common now than her non-feminist, non-leftist counterpart. Counterculture became the new mainstream. Understand that, or get left behind.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 01:46 AM
28

This comment is 60 years behind the curve (at least in the West). In the modern day, female leftism exists to perpetuate female privilege over men, even going as far as to deny basic human rights such as due process in criminal allegations.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 01:43 AM
32

Colleges are notoriously hostile towards men, and privilege women. So of course men are going to resist the hostility by leaning towards political ideologies that resist misandry, and women are going to either turn a blind eye to this discrimination, and/or attempt to help push it to perpetuate their own privilege(s) on campus. This, of course, doesn't stop at college. We are now seeing this same phenomenon leak into woke workspaces, especially at large companies. The same logic applies.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 01:28 AM
4

the only people i speak on behalf of are the retards
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 06:30 PM
2

DAMN YOU LARRYYYYYYYYY!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 12:57 PM
1

yup
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 07:12 PM
0

Horizontally spinning rat
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 11:32 AM
1

Thinking about doing a write up theorizing on the sexual politics of guinea pigs
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 04:12 AM
4

y'all will still find a way to take my shit down no matter what the rules say
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 10:03 PM
3

To be fair fat men don't want to date fat women either. No one wants to date a fat person. If you had the option to date a fat person versus a non-fat person, all people regardless of their body size would pick the non-fat person.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 08:15 PM
2

RIP the Queen
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 09:56 PM
0

For a woman to be a virgin at 30 they would almost certainly have to be a fatty boom boom so its a no from me dawg.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 02:55 AM
3

I've recommended a weight identifier and I think that would be much more helpful.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 08:24 PM
0

no
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 01:30 PM
-2

A very common reason parents of girls divorce are due to disagreements between spouses over how the girl should be raised. Its for this reason couples who have girls divorce more frequently compared to those that have boys. As such, it isn't unreasonable in the slightest for a man to be concerned about a woman with divorced parents. Because if the woman has seen her mother divorce her father over a disagreement over how her child should be raised, the woman will do the exact same thing herself a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 11:41 AM
1

The only thing changes in the sun ruined was the profits on my ornamental gourd futures. 😞 (i will never financially recover from this)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 01:27 AM
5

then dont
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 01:46 AM
5

women getting fat after getting a ring is one of the biggest reasons men shouldn't marry
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 12:26 AM
-1

You dont owe women anything. Men must live their lives to advance their own interests, not womens. Hence, your feelings are true, valid, and good.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 10:13 PM
1

NTA. Feminists are low value, and only fight against sexism that existed 60 years ago. I've never seen a single one fight the misandry going on today, mostly perpetuated by their own members, yet they claim to fight for equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 04:03 PM
3

Plato's Republic. It is probably one of the best, if not the best political literature ever written.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 04:07 AM
4

You know you've said something worth saying the moment BigTech pulls your content. Its one of the most eye opening novels, especially given how ahead of its time it was.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 04:05 AM
5

In your example, society doesnt give men a choice. What you described is an ultimatum, not a choice. When you understand that, you realize how shit a life most men live.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 05:02 PM
1

Mug or Barq's?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 05:00 AM
-1

For the same reason someone can view drug users as victims, but drug dealers as scumbags. Being on different sides of a transaction changes how you're treated. Always.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 03:51 AM
1

I would say its on society, as that is the fundamental source of his blue pilled beliefs that he must simp for a woman. One of the many reasons i advocate for TRP is that men will find tremendous freedom in breaking away from society's expectations that they simp for women, and instead live for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 03:41 AM
5

The amount of simpery here is already off the charts. I'll first start with the general rule. No sane man should never buy a house for anyone but himself. The only name on the deed should be his own. If he can't afford it, then he should rent until he can buy it on his own. And you should always eventually buy something. They aren't making any more land, and renting past a certain age is unwise. To speak to your specific situation, I wouldn't want to go in on a house with you either, because in …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 03:30 AM
2

Some theories have been floated around that they are actually llamas.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 02:36 AM
3

based. His job after the revolution will be making lattes as needed and playing halo 2
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 10:12 PM
1

is it gay for a dog to lick his own balls? and if not, then what about humans licking their own balls?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 10:07 PM
8

The wall is a result of a few things. First, women's value is predominantly determined by their youth and beauty regardless of her age. There are other factors too, but these are the main ones. Second, a man's value is determined in his youth by his looks, but as he ages this changes and becomes his resources. Again, other factors are present but these two are the main factors in their respective ages. So a 20 year old man and woman will both have their value be predominantly determined by their…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 09:31 PM
3

We grow up in a world where literally no one gives a single shit about us beyond the age of 10. Every breath we take beyond childhood is inside of a world constantly exposing us to hostility, unless we actively prove we are worthy of humanity. Not only this, but the world will subject us to this state of affairs, and actively insist we are privileged for living in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 06:29 PM
0

no
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 03:22 PM
3

Im not trying to save the world, im trying to save a buck fifty nine by buying my chicken breast at walmart
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 04:00 AM
1

woah a yellow flair edit: jesus christ how can you use reddit with that its hurting my eyes. PUT THAT THING AWAY!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 01:41 AM
3

For white and asian populations i tend to agree. But black men defintiely got the short end of the stick. Just look at black female obesity rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 08:40 PM
2

Agree. I personally think it might be easier to date as a single father with surrogate children as you get older. There are many women who don't want children of their own but they may be willing to become a stepmother if their dating pool becomes quickly occupied by men with surrogate children. This would also address many people's concerns that a child needs a mother and a father.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 05:19 PM
3

Q4A: You and your significant other decide to take a trip to Africa in order to appreciate the natural landscapes and diverse wildlife that the continent has to offer. During your trip, you decide to take a hike into a nature preserve which is predominantly composed of an extremely dense jungle. During your hike, you accidentally get separated and lose eachother. Attempting to find your partner you go to the perch of a small rocky hill where you see your S/O has been completly cornered by leopar…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 03:00 AM
12

I have never seen this podcast, and have no idea why many think this content is so important to TRP. I have no idea why people think bringing on a bunch of idiotic women and easily owning them is going to further RP goals either. God i miss the manosphere of the early 2010s on YouTube. Simpler times.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 01:17 AM
3

I am not attracted to most of women in western society. So I also know extremely few women with 2 or less partners at that age as well. The trick here is that one, I don't have to date a woman my own age, and two, even though I am not attracted to most women, the women I am attracted to are not entirely extinct. So despite them being few in number, they are still around, and especially when you date younger than yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 09:58 PM
3

Averages don't concern me. What concerns me is what I consider to be an acceptable number, regardless of whatever number happens to fall in the middle of the group. I am mid 20s, and the maximum acceptable number is 2 for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 09:35 PM
2

No. I would leave her sociopathic ass and report her for being mentally unwell so that in the event that some poor sap does fall for her bullshit theres a record that shes a repeat offender and a menace to society.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 04:52 PM
2

Nothing in my previous comment constituted revenge. Quite telling that you believe the rise of men's rights and focus on men's issues inherently involves revenge though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 10:22 AM
1

Yeah, forget all this blue pill simp nonsense. A man's only obligation is to live for himself. No more, no less. Anything else is at his discretion and convienience.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 09:57 AM
1

1st and 2nd wave feminism countered de jure sexism. TRP does indeed counter many forms of dejure sexism, but most misandry in the modern day is de facto in nature. Hence, TRP will combat much more informal misandry brought about by culture, rather than midandry brought about by the letter of the law. This de facto misandry is more indirect, but not less important than de jure misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 02:17 AM
12

I never said the men's movements would be right wing, I simply said they would be non-leftist due to leftists rejecting men's rights, seeing them as opposed to the gynocentric values their feminists beliefs mandate of them. Progressive simply means to move society forward and disrupt the status quo, which is exactly what TRP does. Left vs Right is a different political argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 07:39 PM
28

RP will enter proper politics within the next 10-15 years. Like feminism, it will gain substantial legitimacy from having political figures behind their movement. The steam of woke leftist movements will also probably die out by the end of the decade, leaving room for progressive (non leftist) men's movements to take center stage. Men are not currently thought as as a political group, only women are. This will change, and men will, over time, collectively realize there are things we need to chan…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 04:36 PM
0

This is false. Going back to traditional values is NOT in any way an RP belief. That is a traditional consevative belief, and tradcons are NOT red pill. Traditional conservatives are blue pilled. The pills do not in any way cleanly follow a left-right political axis. TRP is essentially a progressive movement for men to reclaim what it means to be a man from society and instead get to choose that for himself as an individual. In many ways, the RP of today is very akin to the feminism of the 1960s…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 01:21 AM
14

Ok. I can adjust then. If this post was made about women it would be removed. I know this, because ive made theads 2000% less ranty than this one with the topic matter being women and it got removed. But this is a rant. A poorly argued, strawman riddled rant at that. So im peacing out of this thread lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 01:11 AM
20

If a man posted this rant about women it would be removed for being a rant You have also completly misidentified pretty much 80% of TRP. Additionally, there is no evidence that women have an RP detector, nor inherently dislike men who hold RP beliefs (assuming they have no direct knowledge of these beliefs). So yeah. This post is literally just a rant. All i can really find in it are poorly construed strawman arguments that are bad versions of real arguments TRP makes. I suppose as a final thoug…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 01:03 AM
10

I dont know what you're talking about. Im a hard working 4th generation Argentinian and was definitely in no way an SS officer. that uniform in my attic is just for cosplay sir nothing to see here.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 12:01 AM
1

Brazil
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 11:48 PM
5

And all of us, without exception, are censored and marginalized by Big Tech and the elites. Which is what causes our alliance of necessity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 09:46 PM
22

The two don't intersect substantively, but are both caused by the same phenomenon, that being modern society. People misconstrue them both being opposed to postmodern neomarxism and feminism as them being related, when they aren't. To put that another way, just because the Soviets and the US/UK both fought the Nazis, didn't make them friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 09:38 PM
6

The societal expectations of men, both the older expectations in the TradCon category of providing for a woman, and the new expectations in the progressive leftist category which involves putting down men, believing women blindly, and otherwise pushing misandrist narratives.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 09:06 PM
10

Male liberation from the chains of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 06:27 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 12:37 AM
1

No guarantees.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 12:16 AM
0

No guarantees, and the woman recieving the procedure will not know about it until its done.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 12:08 AM
0

For purpose of this question, it can only be done by men on women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 12:03 AM
2

Q4W: Suppose a new technique for CPR was developed that was 5000% more effective than our current methods of CPR and would also result in no long term damage to the CPR reciever's body. However, this procedure can only be done by men, and it involves sticking their penis down a woman's throat to resuscitate her. Would you support men performing this technique on near death unconcious women to revive them? Or does this constitute sexual assault? (Assume no fault in the technique itself, and suppo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 12:00 AM
0

inb4 removed
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 05:43 PM
5

my man seriously just wrote "this post doesn't violate rule 14" in parentheses and thinks thats gonna stop the jannies from donkeyfucking his thead LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 01:51 AM
9

boneless skinless chicken thighs
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 01:29 AM
0

Denmark isn't exactly a superpower my friend. We could certainly compel the sale if we wanted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 12:07 AM
0

Even better, support Albertan separatists then once they secure their border and run Canadian forces out of the province, roll the tanks in and annex it as a state.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 11:32 PM
0

the US should buy greenland
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 11:30 PM
-1

1.) marketing. 2.) if the products are TRULY the exact same, then all women need to do to abolish the pink tax is buy men's products. Boom. Same product, zero pink tax. problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 10:57 PM
1

Given her weight, she probably doesn't have too many recent photos of herself looking half decent, hence why she probably just picked a random picture of herself in what appears to be some weekend on the river/lake. With how some women have their profiles hers doesn't even look that contradictory given no ass/tits are showing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 09:17 PM
2

It's not necessarily confusion, as the children could have come from a previous marriage or LTR given her age. But in any case, she's looking for a meal ticket. That much is abundantly obvious, and why no quality man should ever consider her (or any single mother).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 09:12 PM
2

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 09:01 PM
1

No. Just dont care about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 08:22 PM
3

there's only one good piece of advice: don't care about women
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 07:08 PM
5

Men have greater variability in their ability. There are more male geniuses and superstars, and also more manchildren and men who failed to launch. (As a side note: It is misandrist to treat these as personal failings instead of a systemic societal issue, but that is a different conversation and a digression.) The point is that the average woman, despite being close in ability to the average male, will find herself very often with either a man substantially superior to her, not needing her help …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 06:33 PM
-1

Well we must have used the sub during different time periods because even in my most aggressive definition of women bashing id only say 20% of the threads up openly bashed women. The rest of the sub was extremely chill and usually just a place to talk and trade some advice. You are missing the point though. You need to be showering for yourself, not women. Everything you do you need to do for yourself, and completly forget about the female collective entirely. Even if the conclusion is exactly t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 03:05 AM
0

The majority of MGTOWs never did that. That was BigTech propoganda used as a pretense to ban the subreddit as BigTech often does in order to remove male spaces from the internet. Did some of the sub do it? Sure. But it was only a minority, no where near enough to justify your characterization. But that's just the elites getting us to fight eachother as they always do. And to your main point, you can still seek out sexual and romantic connections, just do so on your own terms. Don't play by their…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 02:55 AM
0

TRP is about waking yourself up from your inherent BP slumber society and the elites set you in since birth. But the answer to how to break that slumber isn't to run in their rat race or play by their rules. What many men forget about TRP is that in order to achieve true TRP you need to truly stop giving a rats ass about women as a group, full stop. Not to say you can't care about an individual woman you may know, but to attempt to change or cater your life to fit the needs of women is 100% blue…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 02:35 AM
8

Men need to get off of social media my friend. Fuck misandrist elitest ass big tech and their censorship. I dont care how much more sex men pull getting it via social media is a no from me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 02:28 AM
2

I AM THE HYPE
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 11:43 PM
1

I do know what body means. And the fetus exists within the womb of the corporate body.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 11:36 PM
1

Correct. And the fetus would be dependent on the corporate person body, as the fetus exists within her wombs.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 11:33 PM
1

The person i was responding to used both words, hence i responded to both words.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 11:27 PM
0

Its body is the possessions it holds. Such a possession, we are supposing, is an artificial womb capable of creating human life. Therefore, under the bodily autonomy argument, the corporate person would have the unfettered right to terminate any such life dependent on its body for life.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 11:20 PM
0

Simply stating something is different, without giving any evidence justfying such a difference outside of "because i think so" isnt an argument. Ive given an argument as to why corporations would get bodily autonomy following the argument you made, and if you have any legitimate piece of evidence suggesitng why they wouldnt under the same argument based on facts, not simply on what you believe, you are free to present it. Otherwise, there isnt much fruit left of this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 11:13 PM
0

Corporations are people, and supposing the existence of artificial wombs they would be in possesion of in their body wombs capable of producing human life. If i follow your argument, it follows since they are in absolute possession inside their body the ability to produce life, they also have the ability to terminate such life via bodily autonomy. There is no meaningful distinction you have drawn to compel me to think otherwise, outside of simply saying "well because i said so". Which isnt an ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 11:07 PM
0

So you are saying the corporation needs the consent of the egg owner and the sperm owner?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 11:01 PM
1

Life support does not create life. An artificial womb does. This body can create and maintain a fetus and allow it to become a life. Such a body is possessed by a corporate person, hence such a corporate person is in possession of a body capable of producing a human life.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 10:58 PM
0

There is a body, as i have noted before. The body being the wombs themselves which create the dependencies for the fetuses. Hence a corporate person does possess the body required to birth a child, and such a fetus is dependent on the corporate person. Hence, following your argument, they would possess a right to terminate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 10:55 PM
0

A corporation is a person as a matter of law. That corporation can own artificial wombs to develop fetuses which will be dependent on them for life. These artificial wombs are wholly and completly owned by the corporation, which is the body of the corporation. If i am to follow your argument, it would follow that the corporate person would have the same control over her womb(s) as the woman would have control over her womb. There is not a meaningful legal distinction you have made between the tw…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 10:48 PM
0

I thought the test was dependency? And there is a body, that being the artificial womb creating the dependency. The corporation owning such a womb being the legal person the fetus would be dependent on.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 10:43 PM
0

Yes there would. The fetus is dependent on the artificial womb, and hence the company who maintains such a womb. (Companies are people as a matter of law, btw) Under your argument, if it is to be consistently followed, the company maintaining the artifical womb would be the person holding the right to terminate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 10:38 PM
-1

So you basically have taken the pro life position as it pertains to artificial wombs? For that matter, the pro life position is that the fetus is its own body, and that body is simply located inside of the mother. So the same pro life position you have just taken on artificial wombs could be used to also ban all abortions in non-artificial wombs as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 10:33 PM
1

With regards to withdrawing consent, this relates to reproductive rights. These do not exist as a matter of constitutional law per the dobbs opinion, but many people argue there exists a moral right for a mother to terminate a fetus. In the case of artificial wombs, it is my contention that this moral right be extended to fathers, this conveying them the power to withdraw their consent to father the fetus, and neccesarily lead to its termination in jurisdictions in which it is permitted.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 10:23 PM
2

Consent is not static, its dynamic. Even if a man consents to his sperm being used inside an artificial womb, that consent can be withdrawn at any time. If a termination is allowed in the jurisdiction the womb occupies, and the man withdraws consent, the termination would need to occur less the mans reproductice rights would be violated.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 10:05 PM
14

The rise in use of artificial wombs would actually lend support to men's reproductive rights. As women will now have to claim that reproductive rights can exist outside of the female body. If artificial wombs ever rose to prominence, I imagine reproductive rights regarding the fetus would need to be split 50/50 between the man and the woman involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 09:25 PM
1

No. The market determines value, not who is equal. Someone of greater value can trade down for a lesser partner and the market cannot stop that from happening. His equal could very well be that younger hot fertile woman. Whether that is true is up to the market value of both people. If they are both 8s, then they are equals regardless of who pairs with who in the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 05:24 PM
6

Yes. Because those 20 year old men having regular casual sex are Chad. And the entire reason dating gets easier for men in their 30s is because they dont need to be Chad anymore. They just need to trade resources for sex. Also, the entire point of being TRP is that you reject society's expectations of you as a man, and you instead be a free bird and fly however you wish. So your social shaming is horribly ineffective.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 04:11 PM
4

Again, you arent taking into account hypergamy. The 20 year old men who have sex are having sex with 20 year old women. But the percent of men in their 20s who have this regular casual sex is only a small slice of the total. Men in their 30s dont have to be Chad, they just have to have resources to trade. So let them do it. More power to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 04:04 PM
5

First of all im not even in my 30s, im just preaching the good word of TRP Second, most men in their 20s get very few women due to hypergamy. Men in their 30s get comparativly more because now they have resources to trade for sex. I personally believe the wisest thing for a man to do is trade those resources for the youngest, most attractive woman possible to get the best bargain. And idgaf about women not have fully developed brains. Doesnt stop them from having wild sex during college, hence i…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 03:59 PM
10

And? Women dont want most men in their 20s on the basis of their looks. They still wouldnt in the 30s. Whats changed, and why things get easier for men is that men in their 30s now have resources and have established themselves. They can use these resources to attract women, including younger and more attracrive women. Women arent entitled to a partner their own age. And men dont have to date someone "age appropriate". Thats a gynocentric male shaming term invented by women to attempt to protect…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 03:50 PM
5

Men who have made at least a little something out of themselves will have much more variety in choosing the left over reject women, divorcees, and single mothers looking for a meal ticket yes. So does dating become easier for a man? Yes. Does it get better? No. Because the quality of women you can now more easily attract nosedives exponentially, and it only gets worse as they get older. Id reccomend to keep growing your resources and try to get a sugar relationship with a woman in her 20s once y…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 03:39 PM
2

No. Simply because a woman is dating a man doesn't mean he didn't trade down. That's illogical. Ok?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 02:02 PM
2

I don't determine an equal, the market does. And if a woman wants a better place in the economy, she needs to earn a better living, not seek a man who does. And even if a woman does get a man that earns a good living, she isn't entitled to any of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 01:27 PM
3

The reason hypergamy shouldn't exist is because it always requires a man to trade down instead of dating his equal. If we accept living in an equal society is an inherent good, then hypergamy is necessarily adverse to that, and should be opposed as it does not promote equality. And if we accept that we must live in an unequal society, and equality is not an inherent good, men could very well remove the civil rights laws that allowed women to advance themselves, falling back in time very much lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 01:02 PM
1

waltuh
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 02:18 AM
1

[Intelligence 2] bark bark RUFF RUFF RUFF WOOF
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 09:17 PM
1

[Speech 65] You must have left it out last night and a mole rat got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 09:14 PM
3

you take a sip from your trusty vault 13 canteen
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 09:05 PM
1

What group of alphas in our hunter gatherer history was ever overthrown by a group of expelled betas? Again i am not talking about a single person. The strongest alpha could be overthrown by a group of the other alpha males if he was too greedy, sure. But never in our hunter gatherer history did a group of expelled, unorganized, beta bandits ever successfully overthrow an established group of alphas.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 08:14 PM
1

No. It was created to exploit the betas. The alphas are using the betas as human shields against the slave class, and also using them to harvest their cash crops. Without the presence of agriculture, the betas would simply be expelled from society, and they would live unorganized, short lives and die without reproducing, as most males did through history. Betas only gained leverage over the alphas once their labor became valuable. They were never a threat to the top males in society, the top mal…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 08:06 PM
1

No. Monogomy was created so the alphas could exploit the betas labor, and protect the alphas from slave revolts because they needed to exploit the labor of the slave class as well. The alphas could do this because the new agricultural society shrunk the size of the male ruling class. The upper class went from being 20-30% of men, to now closer to 1-3% of men. So despite losing more women to monogamy, the upper class could still practice informal polygamy because they were a much smaller slice of…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:59 PM
4

Which is exactly why the "top male" wouldn't be a single person, rather a council of the strongest, most well fed, and experienced men alongside other fighters who were among the strongest of the population. The lower males would be poorly fed outcasts, and despite being larger in number their ranks are not united and they are subject to short lifespans, even for the time. Monogamy was created as soon as the alphas needed to keep the betas in society. For most of human history they didn't. It wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:53 PM
1

Wanting to feel desired by women is not a natural male desire. In nature, men would dominate women and lower males by depriving them of food/shelter with their superior strength thus mandating women submit to the top council of males and make the lower males flee the tribe to live a life of nomadic banditry. Consensual desire is societally constructed. Society tells men getting women and sex makes them desirable, hence men want women to appear outwardly attracted to them because they know this w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:39 PM
1

You need to read more TRP theory. I can't educate you on the ideology, and if you are a woman there are many aspects you are likely unable to comprehend.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 02:59 PM
1

Staying asleep and enjoying a naive slumber is what makes BPers BP. You can only be RP if you are willing to wake up to the horrors of the world and believe that everything isnt okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 02:53 PM
1

Well of course BPs don't accept a basic truth. That's what BP is. Stay slumberd to society's horrible truths in order to maintain the status quo. Plenty of dumb husbands genuinely believe their partners love them while being an idiot BBer, and plenty of manipulative wives will fool their BB husbands into thinking they are perfect so they stay sleeping and never disrupt the status quo.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 01:47 PM
1

AF/BB
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 01:30 PM
0

son ive never been more serious in my life
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 11:56 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 10:40 PM
-1

no. A man doesnt have to have sex to be an anti simp. Just dont simp for women and have a backbone
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 09:47 PM
-2

to be fair male leads are usually simps. So even though they are men they act for the sake of women. female leads usually are misandrist and never help men at all unless they are outdoing them
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 09:37 PM
1

idk female shows just suck donkey nuts imo
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 09:32 PM
-1

I would literally sooner shove a shotgun in my mouth before I'd ever watch a TV show with a female lead unless it was porn. The only one I ever tried was "how to get away with murder" and that show was so horribly racist and misandrist that it made my ears and eyes bleed. never again.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 09:31 PM
0

It just occured to me that the only time i ever consume female content is for porn. Ive also watched many magnitudes more porn than ive ever had actual interactions with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 09:22 PM
2

Women prefer betas once they want their cash and prizes. Women will always prefer fuck boys to have sex with over betas. Always.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 08:56 PM
4

A double standard is only a double standard if a different standard is applied to the same situation. Men and women do not experience the same situation in dating, hence applying a different standard is not only not a double standard, but is a justified difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 06:53 PM
3

No. Nearly all men who are aware and woken up from their BP slumber know it. The only men that don't are the ones kept ignorant by the BP narrative coming down from the top.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 05:44 PM
6

women don't need to claim it. All men know it's true, because we've all experienced it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 05:25 PM
7

Women want their sons to be providers because they know they need an extra meal ticket in retirement, yet they spent their youth attracted to the fuck boy types. None of them cite the beta as actually being better for themselves (aka better for the son). Rather they are concerned with what is best for themselves and/or women as a group. This is textbook TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 05:14 PM
7

South Koreas low fertility rate is connected to their education and work cultute, much like japan. The attractiveness of the average man of a country has no correlation to the fertility rate. Education and development of a country cause fertility rates to fall. The more emphasis put into education, the more time it takes for an adult to get off the ground and thus pushes childbirthing back. Additionally, it makes having a child insanely expensive because you need to pay for the extra schooling.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 05:12 PM
2

As long as the program was well paid and well structured it would help men, but that would be prohibitivly expensive and probably bankrupt the government. Hence why so many vets are ill prepared after being discharged from the military and end up homeless. Because not enough effort is put into ensuring a smooth transition back into society by the government.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 05:09 PM
4

This entire thread is a complete confirmation of nearly everything TRP argues lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 05:02 PM
1

you definitely overrate most women. tattoos on a woman make them automatically below a 5 for me. and even ones without tattoos are still mostly overrated by 1-2 points on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 02:03 AM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 09:15 PM
1

The people who hold beliefs such as women cannot be raped are almost certainly just trolling, and aren't a serious issue. If they are to be an issue, then we must view their belief as the result of existing in a hostile society, and changing that hostile society is the only answer to removing such a belief from a person. However, this comment is trivial, because unlike the belief women can't be raped, the belief "men can't be raped by women" is actually serious, and enshrined in several legal sy…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 09:07 PM
1

Tate never identified as TRP. Though he was identified as TRP by the media in an attempt to associate TRP with "dangerous" content creators. This is often used as a pretense by the elites in justifying discrimination towards TRP/men's groups and people. Manosphere has become mainstream, and we've smashed through virtually every barrier big tech elites have attempted to use to stop us, and we'll smash through every barrier they put up in the future too. The manosphere, and RP ideas are inevitable…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 08:58 PM
3

I typically don't ask questions in my posts. I prefer CMVs where i give no sources whatsoever
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 07:29 PM
5

trying to think of a thread I can post without it getting removed
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 07:12 PM
1

just laying here after jerking off 6 times today listening to the super mario world ending theme trying to fall asleep. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waKumDkYrDY
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 03:04 AM
5

all men want is a kim wexler but all women can give is a skylar white
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 01:20 AM
1

1.) Sex Workers of all kinds are low value. 2.) No. 3.) No. 4.) don't care about mother. Would disown daughter. 5.) Legalizing sex work is a benefit for men, as most woke laws around sex work only are in place to punish buyers of sex, not sellers. Making it so that men can legally buy sex without being jailed only benefits men. In all cases, it will always be sold. Sex work among women is already accepted by most in the young generation, hence additional acceptance would only go towards buyers, …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 12:45 AM
1

Well, of course. As I said he was censored. But BigTech can't silence people anymore. Their control of the market has waned, and as long as we always have a rotation of creators on BigTech platforms to lead men to the people censored off of them, we will always exist and stay strong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 04:54 PM
2

What do you mean "silenced"? He was censored by BigTech elites sure, but this isn't 2016 anymore lmao. There are so many platforms and websites that exist now to specifically counter bigtech censorship that their moderation policies don't work anymore. TRP and tate's content will always live on, and the mouthpieces that exist on BigTech's internet will come and go, likely parroting the narratives spoken outside of BigTech's influence. That's how it's always been, and how the censored side of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 04:51 PM
1

men would be more likely to hookup in both cases, attractive or not because men are always more sexual than women at any given point in the sexuality distribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 04:23 AM
2

an entire society going MGTOW/WGTOW would be akin to the divide between north and south korea (with the caveat that within one generation society dies), where as society as we currently exist is closer a non-violent version of the israel/palestine conflict. We officially all live within one state, and both sides seem determined that the other is the oppressor/aggressor. Unfortunately, despite the two-state solution being more extreme, it's actually a more easily solved problem because in that ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 03:01 AM
0

cant have shit on ppd
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 12:19 AM
4

I'll say one thing about ppd mods and that's they have no sense of humor lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 11:06 PM
0

For men definitely yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/22 02:47 AM
3

Hypergamy is a product of nature, not society.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 10:37 PM
1

The crickets in this thread should tell you how deeply introspective the women of PPD are LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 07:58 PM
5

Manosphere is like any other community. There are good people and grifters just looking to make money. The manosphere has no greater number of grifters than any other industry or community. There are just as many genuine people, and the community fundamentally exists as a response to the rise of systemic misandry within society actively oppressing men and boys for the advancement/convenience of women. So yes, ultimately the dismissal of "just a bunch of scammers" is merely a deflection, and how …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 05:52 PM
5

Ducks can walk, swim, dive, and fly.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 03:09 PM
2

I'm not entertaining your complete strawman towards MRAs. It's completly nonsensical. Also, no one is criticizing anyone for removing a comment making fun of someone who was victimized. It is when that behavior is used as a pretense for brutal regimes of censorship towards all outsider ideas that it becomes a problem, and that is exactly what has happened on virtually all online female spaces. Men can only post there if they accept and agree to abide by the majority ideology. That's my point. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 04:23 PM
3

Many slaves led revolutions to overthrow their rulers. See Haiti as an example, though the country is in the royal shitter in the modern day. My point is that revolutions have all been led by men. Men destroy systems, women reform them for their own causes. Women cannot destroy a hierarchy, nor reform one for a cause not related to themselves or someone they are sympathetic towards.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 04:12 PM
4

The fact that you label MRA and their ideas as "sexist shit" shows that the oh so "progressive" female subs have advanced their own agenda of hate by labeling dissenting and outsider ideologies as "hateful and bigoted". This is the classic playbook for online censorship. And its being close minded towards unsympathetic ideas. And PPD might have female mods, but PPD isn't a female space. Female spaces really only hold themselves together when they shun and censor outsider ideas. Without incredibl…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 04:10 PM
5

You literally proved my point. Women never staged a revolution to gain their rights because they are incapable of destroying a hierarchy. They are only capable of reforming a hierarchy from within. Which is why they didn't have rights for such a long time through history, and only gained rights once the men in power granted them those rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 04:01 PM
5

The very fact that you are blaming the outsider idea for what they are saying, and telling them they must change their idea to suit the needs of the female sub, despite being a men's ideology advancing men's rights shows just how close-minded you are towards it. And you even showed, literally, that you would need to control the narrative of men's rights and tell them what they can/can't say in order to be open minded towards them. That isn't called being open minded. It's called only being open …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 03:59 PM
4

Virtually every revolution in history has been started by men in order to evict the rulers currently in power and establish their own self-governance. Women have never destroyed a hierarchy. They are only capable of reforming one, and they can only reform it in their own favor of what the group determines to be a desirable outcome for women as a whole. This is the reason women have not been able to fight for men's rights in addition to women's rights. They simply cannot organize to help an unsym…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 03:53 PM
5

Well, I said that women's forums are more open minded and accepting towards those that advance a sympathetic idea, and more close-minded than those that don't. And this is exactly correct. On virtually all forms of women's forums on Reddit you'll be able to say things like "I hate men" and "men are violent and dumb and hating them is ok". Why are these hateful statements tolerated? Because they agree with the majority. On the other hand, if an MRA went onto these subs and started to advocate the…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 03:47 PM
3

Men question and destroy hierarchies much better than women do. Women's inability to destroy hierarchies and higher agreeableness is exactly why they are much more likely to seek approval from the group and shun outside ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 03:42 PM
9

The fact you believe this is what im talking about honestly just proves my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 03:38 PM
2

They are empathetic towards those that fit within their own culture, but intolerant towards those that don't, and will give these individuals an outsider label to identify that their ideas do not match with the majority, and hence the whole must be close-minded towards it. The entire idea of "hate speech" is exactly this. Men are much more open minded towards things the group tells them they should hate, and are more close minded to the power structures that exist within the group, hence they ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 03:38 PM
6

Women are more open minded towards people and things they can relate to and are sympathetic towards. If a woman cannot relate to something, nor holds a sympathy to the group of people that does relate to it, she will be 100% close minded to it. She will also be completly close minded towards any dissenting opinions or thoughts within the things she supports. Men are less open minded towards things they like, and more open minded towards things they dislike. Men often criticize and debate over th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 03:30 PM
7

Prehistoric tribal setup. 70-80% of men die by the hands of stronger men before they can reproduce, hence cannot be starved of sex. all women live in the harems of the remaining strong men. These men would have characteristics most women would find attractive. The trade off here being that they would not have this man for herself, rather she would need the support of the tribe to raise her children. So all men and women (alive) are sexually satisfied.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 03:26 AM
1

NTA
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 02:32 AM
0

no. The woman being 35 makes her RMV extremely low, therefore even if she was physically attractive her age would drive her RMV down substantially.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 07:59 PM
45

Women say this because they are all chasing the same top 20% of men, who have an abundance of options and therefore don't need to treat any individual woman with any decency, as she will always be replaceable to him. Most men have decency, though the men with zero options become depressed over time and lose their overall respect for women once they become educated on hypergamy and the structural reasons they fell behind in dating. So on both the top end and bottom end, female hypergamy is the fu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 06:53 PM
4

I'm mid 20s myself, but I'd have no problem being in a casual relationship with someone older. What do you mean by "average"? An average woman is overweight. So if you mean An overweight younger woman versus a gorgeous 35 year old, I'd pick the 35 year old and just keep that relationship casual until I found someone younger and of an acceptable looks/weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 06:44 PM
1

What a foolish question. You do realize that the mere thought of time travel is impossible, don’t you? Of course not. Just stop with these silly rhetorical questions and ask me what you really mean. Are you trying to ask me whether ill have a threesome with you? Because if you are just cut to that and stop this kindergarten level hypothetical.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 02:44 PM
2

listen women couldn't wear pants in 1268 BC and for that reason I'm out
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 01:40 PM
0

Whats my count? What a foolish question. You do realize that the mere concept of how many men I've slept with is merely a theoretical number, don’t you? Of course not. Just stop with these silly rhetorical questions and ask me what you really mean. Are you trying to ask me whether I'll do anal? Because if you are just cut to that and stop this kindergarten level hypothetical. ^ how women view the n count debate
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 01:22 PM
1

No. It's not our job to support and advocate for any level of feminism, and opposing them even where they may be justified is a useful tool for making them spend their political capital before they can get to the crazy 4th wave ideals. In other words, we oppose them on all fronts to keep them stuck behind the newer waves of feminism. Give them nothing. Not even an inch.
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 06:10 PM
20

Well no shit. Women of all shapes and sizes and sexual competencies are showcased in porn. Where as men are only represented by a single type of top 10% man who has a giant penis and is almost always more sexually desirable than the women he is having sex with. So women can more easily see themselves in porn actresses, and they never really have to do anything other than take orders and be in the right positions. Where men have to have an insanely nice body and a big dick and be able to last a l…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 02:41 PM
5

Ultimately speaking this is a question for the man to decide, and each and every man gets to have his own standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 02:33 PM
1

way more McDonald's than churches chicken son
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 02:32 PM
1

Romance? I have zero desire for "romance" if you are using that term how most people use it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 11:16 PM
1

The average woman is a fatty boom boom. I suppose if I was fat, getting an average woman wouldn't be settling. So what you're really saying is if you are above average,then looking for an average person is settling. And duh, of course. Thats how that works. Most people are average. The delusion only sets in when those average/below average fatty boom boom women feel entitled to above average men via hypergamy. Which is what TRP calls out and makes fun of them for.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:18 PM
2

Any woman who doesn't have a history of long monogamous relationships can be assumed to have a promiscuous past, college or not. A woman is never truly single. Any time a woman spends single is just her hooking up with random dudes whenever she feels like, and/or serial monogamy with a bunch of different guys just so she can have loads of sex without it technically being classified as "casual sex".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:07 PM
10

There are 10 million million million million million million million million million particles in the universe that we can observe. ya mama took the ugly ones and put them into one nerd.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:04 PM
8

Women marry for money, men marry for looks and sex. If a woman leaves a sick man, she loses out on probably around half of the estate that would be left in the event of the man's death. So it makes sense for her to stick it out. She wanted the money, and staying maximizes the money she gets. If a man leaves a sick woman, he loses no sex and loses a sickly looking woman, and gains a younger, healthier, sexier new woman and as long as the man can keep her a secret until his current wife dies he pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 03:45 AM
26

Women having negative experiences with men is directly correlated to and caused by the systemic misandry that has led to young men falling behind women in numerous key areas such as academic progression and succeeding to get out of the house and start a life of their own. Women want to have their cake and eat it too. They want a strong, successful, respectful man in her life who can support himself, but she doesn't want to advocate for men's causes or advance men's education or career prospects.…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 09:31 PM
32

Concern troll. This sub does not hate women, and does not violate reddit TOS in any way.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:45 PM
9

SLUG MA BALLS!!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 07:35 PM
2

can anyone help me remember the name of a Pokémon? It was from gen 2 and its body was entirely made of lava
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 07:32 PM
3

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall Humpty Dumpty had a great fall All the King's horses and all the King's men Couldn't put Humpty together again
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 06:57 PM
3

Is there a 40% men requirement?
/r/MensRights11/08/22 02:10 AM
6

No genuine RPer ever "exits". It's not a cult, there is no membership. The ideology always stays with you, and you'll never fall back into your former BP slumber. It's the curse of the red pill. You gain infinite wisdom and knowledge, but at the price of awakening and realizing everything that is wrong in the world and how the deck is systematically stacked against men. The only people on a sub like that are female LARPers trying to gain traction towards getting men back into their slumber of sl…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:06 PM
1

I didnt say they wanted to date them. They will treat them as easy lays and put minimal effort in. The autistic woman will likely believe this is dating, but the man knows he is just using her for free sex. This is a reason many men seek out autistic women. And autistic women are still women, so AF/BB still applies. Those autistic couples could be the result of the woman having two dozen trains run on her through college and simply choosing the easy and relating autistic dude once she decides sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 07:00 PM
1

A 40 year old dude could get a woman in her early 30s. But a woman in her early 40s is probably going to be sought after by men in their early 50s, since the 40s men will be looking for a woman in her 30s. Hence, older women seeking children results in even older men being the father.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 06:55 PM
-5

sperm might play a role too but an older woman will also result in an older man since women typically have children with men older than them. So even then you can't say women aren't responsible.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 06:47 PM
-7

my brother in christ I have no source but if u google it you'll find some stuff
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 06:33 PM
-2

pretty sure there's a direct correlation to age of the mother at brith and autism rates in their child.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 06:20 PM
5

Yeah I don't disagree with anything you're saying. Communicating with someone thats autistic is a horrible experience. Even if you've known someone whos autistic for over a decade and you're friends an in person communication with them could still be challenging and awkward. The only solution I've ever seen proposed to end autism is by identifying autistic fetuses in the womb and simply killing them there. Which really goes to show how non-human society views the autistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 06:19 PM
15

Most autistic men would love to date an autistic woman. Unfortunately most autistic women only date non-autistic men, and those men welcome autistic women because most normal minded men view autistic women as easy-lays that they can easily control and manipulate. And without any kind of protective family they absolutely can do this. But autistic women still prefer that to autistic men because socializing with someone who is autistic is horrible, even if you're autistic too.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 06:13 PM
22

Yeah. Being on the spectrum is one of the biggest hits to SMV that exist. The cruel irony is that the spike in Autism has largely been caused by women having children later in life, and autism primarily effects boys as opposed to girls. So women discriminate against men in dating, on the basis of a disability the boy has no control of, and that women by in large as a group have caused to increase in rapid number because of their own life choices. A cruel story. Yet men/boys having to bear respon…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 06:05 PM
20

No. MGTOWs can absolutely associate with women romantically and in all other ways. MGTOW stands for men going their own way, not men going AWAY. Meaning, to be MGTOW only requires one to stray off the path society attempts to herd us down. MGTOWs can date and have sex with women, they simply need to follow their own rules and always put themselves and their freedom first. MGTOW isn't about social isolation, rather its about men retaking their freedom from society by changing their role in it.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 01:30 PM
7

If any accuser actually had evidence of the sexual assault happening then no one would question it. The author of the image is assuming that all accusers have video evidence showing the crime happening so that everyone can see, or that all accusers are simply truthful by their nature. Neither of these are true. And you cannot assume someone committed a crime simply because someone else accuses them of it without evidence.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 06:23 PM
11

This. A million times this Mens standards are by in large realistic, men simply have a much harder time dating due to systemic, structural reasons beyond their control. The women that try and suggest otherwise are usually loud, insufferable, intolerant, 200 pound tubs of lard that just get off trying to "neg" men by saying they are expecting more than what they deserve, when they are actually being realistic. This is all self serving of course, because their entire strategy of "never settle" is …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 03:15 PM
1

im not ignoring anything. The woke up doesn't let women get owned by men anymore, but they demand women own men all the time. The only time women help men in media is when the media is attempting to show "womenz are the best!!! better than the menz!!" It's insufferable wokeness, and it dominates the new media narratives.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 11:01 PM
4

Men never take any dumps on women in media anymore, unless the media is specifically counterculture to the dominant bigtech/hollywood narrative. All the men usually act for the benefit of women, and the women NEVER help men, and always outdo, belittle, or make fun of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 10:28 PM
-1

A character being a man does not matter, unless he is presented in a way catered to a male audience with no mind paid to how the female audience will react negatively. Women are expected to have their characters, and their characters are specifically tailored to not give any shits about men and take dumps on men the whole movie. Male characters are designed with women in mind and how they act is meant to cater to the female perception.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 10:19 PM
4

False. Default is women. Men are expected to change their media for women, but women are never expected to change their media for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 10:09 PM
3

You're right that's there's no gynosphere. Because we live in a gynocentrist society the entirety of our media and culture is gynocentric unless the community is specifically related to men fighting against gynocentrism. However, all of these communities have been ruthlessly banned by society's elite power structures, hence now only exist on the fringes of most communities due to their marginalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 09:19 PM
397

Raped. She raped a 13 year old boy.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 03:15 AM
12

A FUCKING MUSICAL?!?!?
/r/MensRights04/08/22 07:45 PM
3

One of the biggest issues with modern entertainment is that "women's" entertainment and shows are allowed, and men are expected to either not watch or if they do watch then confirm to its culture. However, Men's entertainment is not allowed to exist. You cannot make a show or video game just for men, and expect women to conform to men's values. The women invade the space and change it to their liking. Just look at the new woke GTA 6 announcement. Men don't have any spaces for themselves anymore,…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 03:24 PM
1

Child support should require a showing made by the person requesting it why it is needed, and what exact amount they need for the total of their child's care, justifying their figures by using the least-cost methods of raising a child, and then dividing that figure by 2. That amount should be calculated as child support, and it must be calculated by the person requesting it, and then investigated as valid by the Court before imposing it on the other parent, who must be biologically confirmed as …
/r/MensRights03/08/22 08:18 PM
2

my man if you simply listen to me I can explain the entirety of the sexual marketplace with gerbils.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 10:48 PM
9

Even with a condom, a woman can simply lie and if the courts flip the burden of proof there will be nothing a man can do to prove he was wearing a condom at the time of the sex. Canadian courts have already begun flipping the burden of proof in sexual assault cases, and this would lead the man being convicted every single time
/r/MensRights29/07/22 08:31 PM
12

And how on earth will this ever be proven? Knowing Canada they will make the man prove that he was told he could have sex without a condom, or make him provide evidence that he was wearing one, which of course men won't be able to do. They will flip the burden of proof of men therefore making any act of sex a sexual assault claim. Men will never be able to prove they were wearing a condom if a woman says otherwise.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 08:19 PM
3

It doesnt matter how old she looks, what I said is still true. Ultimately speaking even if you choose to go celibate and stop having sex, your count is still your count. What you did in your younger years follows you forever. It doesnt just stop after 1 year passes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:52 PM
6

The graph in the post you shared showed that they didn't have sex in the past year. When men ask a 33 year old woman her body count, they can't simply answer 0 just because they have been celibate since they were 32. They could have 100+ bodies on them but they became old and disgusting so no one wants them anymore. If you want to look at a useful figure, ask the same question but for lifetime amounts, not past year.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:48 PM
1

Valid? Sure. Delusional? Most defintiely.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 04:31 PM
0

In TRP there is the idea of the "alpha widow". Basically, women get approached so often by very attractive and wealthy men when they are young that they become used to this kind of man, and believe that type of man is what they "deserve". This leads to the abundance of delusional female dating profiles and the "never settle" mentally found on women's 30+ dating subreddits. They aren't being approached or messged by the top men anymore, so they keep their standards far higher than what they thems…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 04:22 PM
0

If you can handle being criticized and being called delusional, do whatever you want. If you can't handle that, then keep those wishes to yourself and stay quiet. You don't want to settle for someone, you want someone else to settle for you. I dont want to sell my shitbox for $1,000, its fair market value. I want some imaginary fantasy man to come down and sweep my car off its wheels for $40,000. And im not settling!!!! We all get that. We all see that. We all understand that. Just keep yourself…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 04:16 PM
0

And in that scenario I would describe the person who put the offer in as delusional, since they are the ones who foolishly set the price so high obviously against their own interests. However, if after this sale you bought 10 more of those cars and went around demanding everyone else pay you 500,000 for the same car, then I would call you delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 04:10 PM
0

As for "advertising" any online profile seeking a relationship, or any affirmative interest showed to someone IRL could constitute a sufficient showing of them "advertising" their price. If you assume this isn't the case and they are simply approached and show no interest, then of course this wouldn't apply. But if they are approached and do begin showing affirmative interest and pursue, then it would.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 04:05 PM
2

You are correct that you are permitted to do whatever you want, but that same coin of freedom allows people to call you delusional for doing so and you can't stop them either. And they would be correct, because attempting to sell something far above it's fair market value is delusional, and everyone, absolutely everyone will look at your listing laughing at you. "300,000 MILES, $39,500. NO LOWBALLS I KNOW WHAT I GOT!!!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 03:56 PM
1

Thats incorrect. Just because women are rejecting some men doesn't mean they are entering into successful relationships with men who meet those standards. Ultimately speaking whether or not they are delusional is based on whether her standards are equal to male-equivilent standards imposed by members of the opposite gender. In other words, is she seeking about the same number of positive traits in men as she posses as a woman seeking a man? If she seeks a man who is in the top 30% of men as rate…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 03:45 PM
-5

Setting a price far above market value is inherently delusional. The moment you advertise that price on any platform you open yourself up to any/all due criticism resulting from such a delusional valuation. Don't want to be criticized? Keep the valuation (and your horrible shitbox of a car) to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 02:49 PM
–

Because society is gynocentric, and as such there are two different rules for how men can treat women and women can treat their own children. Hell there are even two different standards for how Men and women are treated based on how they provide for their own children. First, men have no ability to escape an unwanted child. Women do. Society gives women an out card, even if they have a baby because they can literally abandon it without consequence because of safe haven laws. Men have no option, …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 02:46 PM
1

Well, of course, yes. But the dispositive question before us is the status of omega gerbil. In particular, he has numerous contenders for the status of new alpha gerbil. My largest concern would be gamma gerbil. Gamma gerbil historically has sat in between alpha gerbil and beta gerbils. These would be alpha gerbils front line fighters, and I imagine many of them would attempt to keep the hierarchy from destruction, but whether or not a true successor has been lined up among the gamma gerbils is …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:28 AM
1

Allow me to rephrase. Gerbils, much like humans, live in dominance hierarchies where the dominant mating pair hold the most power in gerbil society with the betas and lower females having to follow them and eat their scraps. Suppose we have an omega gerbil, one that left the herd at a young age to fend for himself. Suppose he comes back, defeating alpha gerbil. Does omega gerbil become alpha gerbil? Or does the hierarchy simply collapse?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:14 AM
2

Supposing Omega man defeated an alpha, would he inherit the alphas hierarchy in a purely natural social setting?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:09 AM
2

Please tell me more about these omega males
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:02 AM
1

Well yes, if one presumes no troll is present then you won't come to the conclusion that he is trolling. But trolling is an art, my friend. When you encounter a genuinely good troll, you never know who's side he is truly on, or what point he is actually trying to make, if there is any point at all. The troll within completely masks the real intent of the author. Hence, looking at this I must ask myself this question: Was the point of this thread to actually have this discussion, substantively? O…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 02:48 AM
1

Coming from a professional troll myself, I genuinely can't tell whether the point of this thread is to have a discussion or just troll around using the word "omega male".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 02:35 AM
1

my man please don't use greek letter male distinctions unironically, outside of alpha and beta. Just describe the men you are describing. The former has been memed so much online that most people will assume you are just trolling with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 02:29 AM
1

The "rights" you list aren't political rights. It is the same thing as saying women have the reproductive right to keep their legs closed hence abortion bans don't infringe on their reproductive rights. Political rights aren't personal decisions, they are the ability to escape legal repercussions for actions. No political rights, no personal responsibility. Period.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 03:06 PM
2

If you posses the political right to determine whether that child was born, you are correct. Which is exactly why single mothers must be aggressively criticized for their failures. If you do not possess the political right to determine that, then no. Which is why absent fathers cannot be held accountable for a decision they did not make. No rights, no responsibilities, hun.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 02:53 PM
2

No. The topic at hand is whether men can be held accountable for that personal decision. And to understand whether they can be held accountable, we need to examine whether men possessed political rights in determining whether or not the child was born. No political rights equals no personal accountability. The mother chose that the child was born, not the father. Hence, the father cannot be held accountable for not taking care of the child, but the mother very much can and should be held account…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 02:40 PM
2

The right we are discussing is the reproductive right to choose to not bring a child into this world. Men do not possess this political right in the US, you are correct. Hence, men also have zero reproductive responsibility and the blame solely falls on the individual who does possess the reproductive rights, which as you say are women. Thank you for making my argument for me lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 02:26 PM
2

Single mothers statistics take into account all single mother homes, adopted or not. So yes, they would be included. Whether they would be better off adopted or not is another question, that the statistics aren't really able to answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 02:24 PM
-2

Men don't have control of their bodies, as men do not possess reproductive rights in the US. Hence, men cannot be held accountable for unwanted children, as they played no part in having the right to make it so that child was not brought into the world. With rights, come responsibilities. With no rights, come no responsibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 02:15 PM
1

Women are the ultimate deciders of childbirth. If a child grows up without a father, it's because the woman brought it into this world with an absent or unreliable father. Men cannot terminate pregnancies, women can. With reproductive rights come reproductive responsibilities. If you want power people will hold you accountable to that power.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:56 PM
0

Mothers control whether they have babies and who they let nut inside them. They chose a bad man who left her.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:07 PM
3

Single mothers are the worst, have absolutely horrible outcomes for their children statistically. Plus, children who live in homes with non-biological parents have a 2000% higher likelihood of being molested by that non biological parent compared to children who live in homes only occupied by biological parents. So not only does the single mother set her child up for failure by not raising and providing for them properly, they also bring in random dudes that end up diddling their children too.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 03:46 AM
1

were it so easy my friend were it so easy
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 02:21 AM
3

stop consuming 2 packages of Ritz peanut butter sandwich crackers (6 sandwich crackers per pack) a day
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 07:46 PM
2

Most RPers think the way we do because of our mothers, not random women (though, how our mothers raised us might have negativly impacted our ability to get women). Plenty of women might dissapoint us, but a man doesn't get RP'd without a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 02:09 AM
6

Because they think it's gouda when it's obviously provolone.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 01:47 AM
2

I also don't live on the moon but I don't like people walking around saying its made of cheese
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 12:31 AM
1

Religious women don't even have religious values. Most young religious women I've known are either ugly or hoes. The idea of an attractive, young, single, and godly woman is a complete fiction. If such a woman existed, she probably married her high school sweetheart she's been with since 15. Most women who do embrace religion do so for its "forgiveness" aspects. So they hoe around as much as they want and follow religion as a means of cancelling out their sluttiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 12:13 AM
1

I'd reccomend doing some TRP reading, especially on MGTOW. You should search around for TRP forums where you can read about MGTOW from an RP source. Disregard non RP sources on the matter as they are big tech propaganda.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 01:57 PM
4

Alphas: Good sex with a man objectively more attractive than her. Betas: Cash and prizes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:06 AM
36

Society is systemically misandrist.
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 08:55 PM
0

It's illegal so of course they charge more because they take more risk. But if it were legal and girls could become hourly employees the costs would come down because there's less risk involved and things would be much safer. Also it's unskilled work so they have abundant access to labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 05:53 PM
0

Sex is unskilled work if it's done through a gloryhole. $90 an hour total revenue would probably get the worker $25-30 an hour on their end and that's much, much better than most unskilled work pays. And gloryholes don't involve sucking D, nor even seeing or smelling someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 05:52 PM
-2

what many people fail to realize is that legalization will bring in huge capital into the prostitution business, scaling it up, lowering prices, and making it more widespread. The people who say legalizing it will have no effect really underestimate the impact of capital coming into the business. You could have large scale brothels opening up like those huge gas stations that also have big convenience stores attached. Imagine being on the road, getting gas, grabbing a snack, and also being able …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 05:13 PM
9

No. I wouldn't have sex with a woman I wasn't interested in, so if I'm having sex with her it's because I'm interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 02:58 AM
3

my standards in women aren't high. Hell, they aren't even physical, outside of not being overweight or obese I don't really have any physical standards. They are particular, but not "high". Most women could absolutely attain them by shifting their attitudes and stop being shitty towards men, but they simply choose not to. Edit: I suppose some might consider a standard against tattoos and piercings outside of the ear to be a physical standard, but I view this as a mental health issue and thus an …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 03:44 AM
1

BetaBuxx
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 10:16 PM
3

Men date younger women, while women tend to date older men. Men can find new partners more easily as long as they are willing to BB and are willing to provide, where as women cannot use their resources in the same way to find a new mate. They lost their only selling point, which was their youth and beauty. Without that, their chances of finding a new partner are very low compared to a man in a similar situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 09:05 PM
16

There are many of us who couldn't give a flying fuck when women are flirting with us, because we don't care. This isn't a game many men want to play. Many men just want women to stop being misandrist and take accountability for their actions instead of always trying to shift the blame to a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 01:14 PM
-2

society is systemically misandrist therefore taxing men every day they live simply for existing
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 05:43 PM
0

nope. Not at all. Re read my comments to figure out why this is incorrect because this discussion has become fruitless.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 10:57 PM
1

No. the right does not only apply to pregnant people. Therefore the other methods apply to people regardless of pregnancy status.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 10:50 PM
1

Legal escape applies to all people. You do not need to be pregnant to have a right to legal escape. I am also not required to give you any kind of exhaustive list. Any escape that would severe any/all legal consequences from pregnancy would be sufficient, whatever that might be. I am not required to give a list, and those escape methods DO NOT just apply to pregnant people, but ALL people who could be effected legally by the consequences of the pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 10:44 PM
0

IT IS NOT ****TIED**** TO ANYTHING. IT IS ONE FORM OF ESCAPE. IT IS NOT THE ONLY FORM. IT IS ONE AMONG MANY FORMS OF LEGAL ESCAPE.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 10:39 PM
1

THEY CAN HAVE THE MEDICAL PROCEDURE WITHOUT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES. I HAVE SAID THIS 12 TIMES NOW. RE READ EVERYTHING I HAVE WROTE.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 10:34 PM
1

No it isn't being the right to escape pregnancy is not tied to the pregnant person, but rather the legal consequences of the pregnancy which you seem to be unable to comprehend.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 10:29 PM
1

They can obtain the medical procedure if they want. They have the right to do so without any legal consequences
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 10:18 PM
1

Something not being tied to a medical procedure means that a medical procedure is not neccesary for the right to exist. It does not mean the medical procedure can't exist alongside the right. Terminating the pregnancy is one form of escape, alongside many others.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 10:12 PM
1

No it isn't. The medical procedure is ONE FORM of escape. It is not the ONLY form of escape.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 10:05 PM
1

They can have their medical procedure if they want. The right conveyed to them is that there are no legal consequences for having that procedure.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 10:03 PM
1

All people have them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 09:59 PM
1

Reproductive rights refer to escape from legal consequences. They are not tied to any medical procedures or biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 09:49 PM
1

If reproductive rights are to exist, they do. I am not suggesting nor mandating they do exist, but I am saying that IF they are to exist, they apply to all people, and must be given on equitable terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 09:41 PM
1

No phyiscal operation is required for a right to exists. Rights are not conveyed by the government or any medical procedure. They are endowed by a person's creator, and are inalienable to all people, regardless of sex, race, gender, or organ status. If a pregnancy never becomes a birth, no legal consequences will exist because of it, and as I said earlier reproductive rights only exist in the presence of legal consequences associated with a pregnancy. Hence, if there are no legal consequences, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 09:35 PM
1

Birth is a consequence of pregnancy. Therefore any consequence of birth is also a consequence of pregnancy. Reproductive rights are extended to all citizens regardless of sex, gender, or organ status, and on equitable terms. They refer to the ability to escape the legal consequences of unwanted pregnancy, and yes that does include birth.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 09:19 PM
1

It did happen because the right is referring to legal consequences associated with the pregnancy. If there are no legal consequences with the pregnancy, then no right of escape is present. But the moment legal consequences exist for the pregnancy such as child support payments or any other obligation then a right to escape is established in order to absolve someone of any legal consequences associated with the pregnancy
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 09:13 PM
1

No. Termination is one form of escape, but abandonment is another. Hence why the right is not tied to an organ. Anyone, regardless of gender, sex, or organ status has a right to ESCAPE an unwanted pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 09:02 PM
1

I just said escape an unwanted pregnancy. Not terminate. There is no right to terminate, rather a right to escape without consequences. Hence why it is not tied to an organ.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 08:59 PM
1

Reproductive rights refer to the ability to escape unwanted pregnancies. They are not tied to sex, gender, or organ status. They are equal for all citizens, and must be offered on equitable terms to ALL.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 08:55 PM
1

We are talking about the right to escape an unwanted pregnancy. This is a legal right. They can escape without any legal ramifications. That is the scope of this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 08:53 PM
1

No. Rights are not tied to organs. They are bestowed upon us by our creator, whomever that might be. If this right exists, it is a right to escape an unwanted pregnancy without consequence. Hence it is not tied to any organ. it is also not tied to biological sex as all people are created with equal rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 08:50 PM
1

No reproductive rights are tied to any organ within the body. They either exist, or they don't. And if they do, they are extended to all citizens as we are all created with equal rights at least in the U.S. So men do have the right to get out of an unwanted pregnancy if women are extended that option.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 08:44 PM
1

No. Reproductive rights aren't tied to having a uterus. If they are to exist, they exist in all humans and involve avoiding any consequences in the event of an unwanted pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 08:34 PM
1

Getting lucky in court or concealing information does not convey an inalienable right. Also, no. I don't now have the same right as women, rather women now have the same right as men. Men have always had no reproductive rights, now women have the same. So the ruling promoted equality! Feminists should be quite happy about this! :)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 08:27 PM
2

Not having rights to escape an unwanted pregnancy = no reproductive rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 08:20 PM
-1

All of those posts are calling out either misandrist women or misandrist systems that benefit women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 05:29 PM
6

Feminism yes. Women no. Misandrists and feminists will be opposed, those aren't necessarily women, but definitely can be and often are.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 04:53 PM
3

Misandrists are both men and women. Feminists are both men and women
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 04:43 PM
3

men can be misandrist
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 04:29 PM
-2

Yes. The men's right's movement is inevitable. Big tech tries to strike us down but we will come back twice as strong.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 04:29 PM
-3

The government controls male bodies by not giving us reproductive rights and tying our right to vote to us having to be drafted and die in war. Big Tech controls us by censoring us when we speak out or attempt to rise up against the system, instead choosing to prop up female narratives at the expense of men everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 04:01 PM
20

Society is systemically misandrist. Men need to only take advice from RP men, as all other advice or comments are harmful and meant to perpetuate societal control of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 03:51 PM
-4

Don't be kind, or a pushover. Have a strong center, and well-reasoned opinions. And never put up with female bullshit. This will, one, weed out low quality misandrist women, and two, attract most women because women like strong men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 04:19 AM
0

You're right. With how important men are in society it is quite the shame we don't get more respect from women and society. I can certainly tell you abortion as a political issue would be a hell of a lot more popular if it respected men's reproductive rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 09:47 PM
7

Try having zero reproductive rights. Try being told "keep it in your pants". That is what it's like being a man, that's what is happening in only a handful of states with some exceptions allowing many kinds of abortions in some cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 09:43 PM
5

Sex is definitely a part of life. So yes, on some level the sex a man obtains will effect the quality of his life. Same goes for his overall treatment by women in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 09:38 PM
8

80% of men have never been able to attain casual sex. Life doesn't change at all for most of us. It's still shit, and we went from having zero reproductive rights to still having zero. It's women's whose lives have been made worse, by giving then a slight taste of what it's like to be a man in certain states maybe sorta.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 09:36 PM
1

Young fetus futures are through the roof right now! 1 year from now we'll be delivering double the babies than originally projected!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:17 PM
1

I just don't see it. If a woman is stuck in the middle of the deep south poor as shit surrounded for thousands of miles by states with hostile abortion laws there is simply no way she will be able to obtain an abortion by crossing state lines. Sure, some will seek illegal abortions, but this will be a smaller group than those who would have gotten a legal abortion thus overall raising fertility rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:14 PM
1

Nah. Poor people make the most babies, and I suspect they will have lower illegal access compared to legal access they had before the decision. Meaning, unless they stop having sex the fertility rate will increase.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:06 PM
1

Bullish on US fertility rates now that Roe is gone. We have been at 1.7-1.8 per woman for awhile now but we could get to 2.1-2.5 pretty easily by restricting abortion fixing many demographic issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:58 PM
5

Everyone constantly shitting on men, and raising up and lifting women even when they are complete garbage.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 07:39 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB4Nby2Ai-g
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 01:32 AM
25

When I was 18-20 sure you could probably say I was more romantic and at that point I probably still believed love within relationships truly existed. Now? Fuck naw. Love doesn't exist, marriage is a scam. Society is misandrist, most women are too. Live for yourself, obtain sex as needed, hoard as many resources as you can and never give anything away. (My taxes going to deadbeat single moms is more than enough already.)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 05:04 AM
48

1.) Women who view male virginity as a red flag are likely (almost certainly) misandrist, so forget them. Nothing of value lost. 2.) 21 isn't late at all, and most wouldn't even consider you a late bloomer yet. By 25 most would probably say you are a late bloomer for not losing it, but it isn't a red flag in any case.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 11:18 PM
1

1.) Money 2.) Societal shame. People don't need to know you have a sex bot, but if the sex bot prevents you from getting a partner society will look down on you for being single, as opposed to women who are allowed to say "men are trash" when explaining why they can't find a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 05:48 PM
1

No she fucking won't. She can literally ride affirmative action programs to land a cushy job despite being completly incompetent. Society does everything for and takes care of women. Being unsuccessful as a woman is possible, but you literally have to lose the game on the easiest difficulty with training wheels to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 02:24 PM
0

not really. It's more like I say the sky is blue but dont have a study to prove it because its so obvious
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 02:29 AM
0

The most physically attractive men get women to make dinner for them, not the other way around. And it's this physical sexual desire that is required for someone to actually be having sex. If a woman is using sex as a means of attaining an alternate goal, then it isn't really sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 01:17 AM
0

They are admitting to hooking up, which does constitute sex and he won't view as shameful because it implies women actually want him. So he will want to lie and call it a hook up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 01:11 AM
2

a body is most certainly not a body. but anyway yeah if a guy has little to no standards it is much easier to get more sex, but that sex probably wont be enjoyable, hence why most men stay virgins because its preferable to have nothing compared to trading down that far. (e.g. a 6 settling for a 1)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 01:09 AM
3

99% of men would not disclose a prostitution visit to their doctor. Even if they caught an STD they would say it was from a hookup not an escort because they know how shameful it is. I see no reason to treat the indirect transaction any differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 01:06 AM
0

did I ever say it was supported?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 01:04 AM
1

if an average guy is willing to screw fat chicks then yea thats entirely possible dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 01:04 AM
1

not really. most people don't regard prostitution as having sex either. A man who hires 100 prostitutes' isn't considered sexually successful. I see no reason to treat indirect prostitution any differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 01:02 AM
-2

No. It doesn't need to be a hook up per se. But a man cannot transfer any value or utility to a woman for it to count. Otherwise he is simply bribing her. The top men dont need to bribe women, in fact most women do stuff for them, not the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 12:59 AM
3

most men are sexually unsuccessful, and a small minority of men are hyper successful.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 12:57 AM
-1

I do not count sex given via indirect prostitution as being "sex". Sex only counts if it is given outside the context of a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 12:52 AM
1

what do you mean
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 12:51 AM
7

A man can obtain a relationship sure, but this does not mean a woman truly wants him. The fact is that the man is simply using the relationship as a way of bribing the woman into having sex with him. It's payment in-kind, an indirect form of prostitution, and I do not count this as having sex. Having sex involves your partner actually wanting you physically, not them hitting the age of 30 and freaking out that they are running out of time to have children and have no hope of ever buying a house …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 12:39 AM
11

Again having sex once does not debunk the 80/20 law. All men could have sex once a year, but if the top 20% had sex 5 times a year that would cause an 80/20 distribution. The reality is that it's even worse than that. The top 5% gets 40% of the sex, the top 5-10% gets 25%, and the top 10-20% gets 15%. So men outside of the 80% are only left with a meager 20% to split among all of them, which realistically goes to the top 20-40% most often. The most sexually successful men hoard the sex to themse…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 12:32 AM
0

Yes they can. Top 1% men can easily get multiple women, even harems of women constantly surrounding them at all times. Top 20% men can always have a woman, because all 100% of women are hoarding themselves around them, thus creating a gigantic surplus.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 12:25 AM
14

having sex once is all it takes to lose virginity. 80/20 rule means that 80% of the sex is distributed to 20% of men, which it is. Sexually successful men can easily bag a woman every night of the week if they are so inclined, where as average men, even above average men may get lucky once a month at most for casual sex. The reality is that most men cannot get any casual sex at all, because the men at the very top can have and do have as much as they want. Hence, all the sex goes to them, leavin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 12:20 AM
2

Rape is very normal in nature. Many species produce exclusively via rape, in fact. In ancient times armies would usually enjoy a "right to pillage" over cities and villages they conquered. Which involved the men sacking the city, taking the valuables, and raping the women and killing indiscriminately before the rest were taken as slaves. These benefits and riches was one of the main things many soldiers in ancient armies looked forward to. And many times leaders of armies needed to sack cities i…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 07:47 PM
6

Warring enemy tribes for women was definitely a purpose of war. Slavery in general was widespread for 99% of our species existence, and sex from female slaves was expected. The remains of the men who were conquered would work until they died of exhaustion in dire conditions, such as ancient gold mines or intensive field work. The conquering nation would also gain new lands, which would increase the number of men in their society with access to wealth and assets. And with a new class of slave lab…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:50 PM
1

agree
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:43 PM
1

Opposite. My mother had brown hair and I cannot date women with brown hair because they remind me of her. I stick with blondes and black haired women instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:36 PM
8

PPD taught me there are 3 types of people in the world. Intelligent RP men. Desperate BP simps. Obese women over 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 12:29 PM
5

I personally have no absolute opinion on abortion, as I believe there are some circumstances in which its necessary and others in which it's murder such as a post birth abortion. What I detest, however, is the pro-choice camp's refusal to accept paper abortions into the discussion, and refuse to advocate on any women's issue until paper abortions are included and men's rights added into the reproductive discussion.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 05:05 PM
5

Any intelligent man knows you don't ask a woman a question to get a useful answer. Women only answer questions in ways that are self-serving to their own image, with no regards to the truth. Therefore, no question asked will be answered honestly. Which is exactly why men shouldn't take advice from women, rather they must take advice and have discussions about women with other men, not women. That's the only thing that genuinely helps male development.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 01:57 PM
3

why was my flair changed? Edit: nvm it's back Edit2: now it's gone again. can't have shit on ppd edit3: it's back again
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 01:22 AM
1

FDS does not create nor attract HVW. It attracts obese, or at the very least chubby, mentally ill, misandrist, hypocritical traditionalists (progressive for women, traditional for men) that expect men to be better than her in every way but still worship the ground she walks on for some reason. These women are beyond help, and promote hate. It's that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:45 PM
1

BP is society's default mode. Every man gets BP teachings from the day they are born, and will continue believing it until awoken by the red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 04:39 PM
1

I love Jordan Peterson, though disagree with him on many things. He changed my life immeasurably, and I've done much better after following him BP teachings are inherently destructive to men. JBP together with other RP creators give men a much better ideology to follow and help break free from blue pill slavery.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 04:19 PM
1

You linked Penumbra theory. I do not support penumbra theory, and it's becoming very clear the current Court does not as well. The Court has ruled the commerce clause grants those powers. The Court determines what the constitution means. See Marbury v. Madison. Again, you clearly don't have a background in law so pursuing this further is fruitless.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 11:57 AM
1

Jesus christ. NO. WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT (just) ABORTION. We are talking about the right to privacy, who's authority is penumbra theory, and which supports both abortion and contraceptive access. Again no. I support the passing of a new amendment enumerating the right to privacy, on the express condition that that amendment contains language granting men the right to reproductive freedom through paper abortions. Again no. Something does not have to be commerce, as the case directly showed. Rem…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 01:15 PM
1

Contraceptive access is absolutely tied to the right to privacy. See Griswold v. Connecticut. U.S. ban on abortion my dude. U.S. means federal level, not state level. I literally said it would be kicked to the states. The Right to privacy is not located in the US constitution. It is a creation of penumbra theory, as I have said numerous times. Absent penumbra theory, there is nothing in the constitution preventing a state from regulating abortion. Also no. State governments do not require direct…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 01:03 PM
1

I never said contraceptive access was a part of the argument. Penumbra theory supports both contraceptive access and abortion for the same reasons, that being the right to privacy. The 14th amendment is implicated via the due process clause. This is how incorporated amendments are applied to the states. Again, the point is that Roe lives or dies on Penumbra theory, since that is the support of the right to privacy. No one is attempting to support a US ban on abortion. This case would simply kick…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 01:21 PM
1

The right to privacy was created via penumbra theory. And the right to privacy is the basis of contraceptive access as well as abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 12:50 PM
1

Against unreasonable searches and seizures. This amendment is the reason the police need a warrant to search your home, it does not have any enumerated support for contraceptive access.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 12:24 PM
1

Yes, yes I have. A right to privacy is not enumerated in the 4th amendment. Penumbra theory asserts the 4th amendment is one of the amendments that implies a right to privacy, but penumbra theory is bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 11:54 AM
7

What I absolutely love about this is how you call me a misogynist for demanding equal treatment under the law. But that's just an accurate representation of what feminism has become these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:58 AM
5

Disabled people have rights to an accommodation under statutory law, not the constitution. And the ADA doesn't run afoul of the 14th amendment because it serves a legitimate state purpose if I remember correctly. Though even the ADA has to constantly defend itself from claims of unconstitutionality for many reasons. In the facts at bar, reproductive freedom would be tied to a right to privacy, not a right to pregnancy. So discriminating based on the status of pregnancy would be a clear violation…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:52 AM
6

Rights guaranteed under the law cannot be extended to some groups of people, but deprived from others. That is a brazen violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment. The only reason we accept our current system is because men collectively don't realize we actually DO have reproductive rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:45 AM
2

Again, from a biological standpoint it is not. Yet, the law can/should/must treat it as being equal for purposes of the law. The same should be true for reproductive freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:43 AM
3

No. The law cannot treat people differently on the basis of gender/sex, or a number of other characteristics. That is literally illegal. We accept our current system because men in America don't realize they have reproductive rights they are being deprived of, which the government should be guaranteeing. I very much hope those in the Men's Rights movement can use this ruling as leverage into getting equitable treatment on the state level.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:41 AM
6

On a biological level that is very incorrect. One of these sexual acts can create a baby, the other cannot. From the standpoint of biology, they are two entirely separate acts.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:37 AM
2

The law isn't erasing a biological difference, it simply is being mandated not to discriminate against their citizens on the basis of that difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:36 AM
-3

Men and women do not play equal roles in reproduction, but this does not mean the law cannot be mandated to treat them equally. Straight sex and Gay sex are also unequal. Yet a right to privacy would disallow laws being passed to ban Sodomy. Just because two acts are biologically unequal does not mean the law has to or should treat them differently. If you want a right to privacy, I demand it be applied to both men and women equitable. If women have access to opting out of a child, so should men…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:30 AM
2

I mean, I support the doing away of penumbra theory so yes all of those would lose their federal protections at least for a time. In reality, I would support a separate constitutional amendment being passed establishing a right to privacy. These would essentially restore all of those previously lost rights that relied on the shaky and unstable grounds of penumbra theory to exist again. I would only do this on the condition that the amendment also specified men would have equal access to reproduc…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:21 AM
-1

Abortion rights are not overturned. SCOTUS is overturning Roe v. Wade, which established the right to privacy guarantees constitutional access to an abortion in the first trimester. Hence, this case is not about abortion, but the right to privacy on the federal level. You may be wondering what constitutional amendment the right to privacy is located, and the answer is none. The right to privacy was created via penumbra theory. This theory created the right to privacy by taking several constituti…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 02:54 AM
1

Men can't answer this question for you. And just get some proof and go to HR/legal with it and you'll be able to easily prove your case.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 05:24 PM
1

I don't keep burner accounts, the only reason I would ever use a different account is when I get banned and have to create a new account. Hasn't happened in awhile because I take my shitposting to 4chan and youtube comments section these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 01:40 AM
2

Men: 35 Women: 21 ​ EDIT: I should also add that a man's desirability, while generally peaking in his mid 30s, is going to vary along with the woman's age. Studies have shown women have a strong preference to prefer men close to their own age, which will cause variation in the male age. Men do not show any such preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 10:24 PM
1

left the house when I was 12, we see eachother maybe twice a year these days
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 05:06 AM
5

Women with tattoos are definite low value sluts. I've ghosted many women after seeing they have tattoos when it wasn't abundantly clear that they had one at first. Don't have a tattoo, never will get one. You don't put a bumper sticker on a Bentley, son.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 05:01 AM
0

Average men don't operate with high standards. They barely operate with any standards, and society STILL shames them for holding women to the bare minimum.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 03:04 PM
0

People can have any realistic standards they want, else they should be shamed by society for being delusional. Society instead chooses to empower women for unrealistic standards and put down men for bare minimum standards because of gynocentrism. Hence why gynocentrism must be smashed.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 03:03 PM
42

If I had a ice cream cone I'd be very concerned if other men were sticking their dicks in it
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 02:02 AM
0

No. Constructive prostitution is prostitution that lacks the traditional formalism, but maintains the same structure substantively. And that is what modern dating is for the average man. You indirectly buy prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 12:02 AM
0

If a man pays money to subsidize a woman's life, and sex is returned in exchange, then that constitutes constructive prostitution. It's merely a formal difference from the direct exchange of money for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:57 PM
1

A man paying for a woman's drink at a bar is a form of indirect prostitution yes, assuming it leads to sex. Why do you think men pay for things when it comes to women? Do you seriously think anyone is just being nice? No. Its because prostitution is the only way 80% of men can get sex. It's not fantasy. It's reality. I hope the Red Pill wakes you up.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:52 PM
1

You're assuming he is using the Condom for her. He could be using the Condom for his own protection, and that would not constitute a payment assuming he wishes to wear it. A true Chad would not wear a Condom if he didn't want to wear one (though most men realize this is a dumb position to take). He would simply find a different woman to screw because he is viscerally attractive, and therefore has access to sex the same way women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:47 PM
1

No. To put it more fairly, if you subsidize any aspect of her life you are indirectly paying for sex. And again, most men DO have access to PAID sex in small amounts.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:43 PM
1

Yes you are paying indirectly if you are paying for their side of the bill. Also, driving her around would also be an indirect payment as well, living together if she doesn't pay fully half on rent as well. Paying costs for children in any amount if those kids aren't yours would also constitute an indirect payment for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:42 PM
0

They very well may be lying to you about not having to pay in order to protect their own reputation. Keep in mind anything as simple as paying for a drink or a meal that leads to sex would constitute an indirect payment for sex. Also, it is possible that they are all screwing the town bicycles, but that isn't a scenario most men want.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:38 PM
1

If they aren't using resources to do so, then yes they are the top 20%. If they are using their incomes or assets to pay women indirectly for sex then they are in the bottom 80%. Most men DO have access to PAID sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:33 PM
0

No. You simply don't realize what an "average" man is. You only see men in the top 20% as "men", so you believe "average" is the top 10%. For average men, you need to pay for sex in one way or another. We ALL know this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:29 PM
0

No, they don't. Average women do. Most average women see an "average man" as a man in the upper 20%. True average men do not have access to UNPAID casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:27 PM
0

NO. It only takes one sexual experience to create a child. And using birth control you can have numerous sexual experiences without creating any child. One man could get sex once and have a baby, while another man can have sex 4 times and have no babies. That is an 80/20 distribution right there, with the man getting less sex having more children.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:26 PM
1

Men are success objects. Men trade their resources for sex. The only men who don't trade resources for sex are the top 20%. The top 20% have access to sex through their physical attractiveness, like 80% of women. That is why this top 20% gets 80% of the sex, because women simply open themselves up for them for free. The bottom 80% of men get the remaining 20% of sex, which could very well be action every month, or every other month, but in any case it is substantially smaller than the top 20% of…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:23 PM
4

Getting sex once a year with a 43 year old BMI of 33 single mother is not equivalent to getting to bang 30 hot young 20s college chicks a year. Suggesting men having mixed families or even having children at all invalidates the 80/20 rule is nonsense. 20% of men can still be getting 80% of the sex regardless of how children are distributed, because of birth control methods.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:13 PM
0

No she doesn't have a point because paternity fraud is evil and saying "at least he gets sex" is so beyond tone deaf to men's issues my jaw nearly dropped when I read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:05 PM
3

It's self reported data. A man could THINK a child is biological when in reality they are an unknowing stepfather. Also, a man could have needed to pair up with a single mom to get a biological child of his own, making him a stepfather too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:00 PM
-6

Jesus christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 10:54 PM
3

And many men are raising "biological" children thinking they are the father when in reality they aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 10:52 PM
23

How many of those men are stepfathers? How many of those men had to date a single mom with another man's baby to get a child within a "mixed" family? How many of those men are not fathers at all and they don't know it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 10:46 PM
1

Man rapes a woman then she claims she is afraid of all men. That's misandry
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 08:13 PM
2

When they justify acts of misandry in response to events of violence that happened to them, or more commonly events that haven't even happened yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 07:50 PM
1

I mean I wish to abolish marriage as we know it via reform, but it can exist so long as men stop getting screwed because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 05:15 PM
1

You don't understand I'm suggesting we get rid of the jointly owned status and to leave you must forfeit all marital property.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 05:06 PM
1

Because judges have been shown to be biased towards men
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 01:10 PM
1

the problem with abuse is that all women will claim abuse to get free stuff if you allow it as an exception. So you can't consider it unless there is overwhelming evidence that it's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 12:35 PM
1

If simp judges allowed men to write weight gain clauses into prenups that would work. But they don't even let men protect any assets without tearing up the contract the minute the woman starts crying and says you abused her.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 12:32 PM
1

I didnt know anything about RP until I was about 12 or 13 and began watching manospheric youtubers back in the early 2010s. They opened my eyes to the truth of the world and broke my blue pill slumber. Haven't ever gone back since.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 10:08 PM
1

if I have a girl, tell her not to be a slut and don't fall down misandrist rabbit holes online that will try and teach her from a young age to hate men. if I have a boy, teach him about misandry and gynocentrism, and teach him how he can grow up to fight it and not be depressed because of it. outside of this, I would allow most if not all misinformation they get from the world to be taught to them, because being a dumbass growing up is key to development. I thought sex involved a man putting his…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 01:21 AM
2

44 and overweight are the only 2 things you really needed to say. Men don't care about education or job. The lack of being a single mother isn't a positive. And fat boobs don't count. While it is biologically possible for you to have children, it will be very difficult and expensive. Most men at that age are dating younger women to get fresher eggs so having healthy children is an easy process. Men who just want sex will still be interested, but all the serious ones will be dating women in their…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 12:50 AM
1

To be clear, I'm vetting the women out. Not the other way around. And I'm not a Republican, nor do I identify as right wing. I identify as a centrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 07:37 PM
10

I never said "the other side". I belong to no side, and I find deeply religious right wing people to be pretty insufferable too. In fact, woke leftist outrage and right wing religious outrage are 2 sides of the same coin. Horseshoe theory in action indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 04:50 PM
3

Nope. Most of these people suffer from extreme TDS and are brainwashed off of Twitter and other social media. They genuinely cannot fathom people existing that disagree with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 04:42 PM
9

The issue is that women define "problematic view" as any view that disagrees with me. And the people who do this most often are leftist and feminist women, hence why I vet them out. Not to mention they are also hypocrites and misandrists most of the time. I'm not even right wing, I'm much more center holistically. But I much prefer apolitical, centrist, and non religious right wing women. The only ones I won't touch are leftists.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 04:01 PM
19

Men who don't vet are insane. I vet at every opportunity I can. Obviously some things like obesity aren't abundantly apparent, but other things like whether they are a misandrist feminist SJW is less obvious on first glance, and many women may try to hide or normalize their beliefs. It's become much easier with the tags most OLD apps let users have. It's even better that they include tags like feminism or women's rights, but not having tags like men's rights, because men get to hide their belief…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 03:47 PM
1

woman wearing low cut shirts while out or at work man not having sex with his spouse
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 03:28 AM
-1

The women not having sex are obese/midandrist so they dont count.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 01:38 PM
1

They aren't inherently valuable, so I dont need to offer anything in great value to then outside of basic decency. Because being a pickme girl isn't a high value trait, it's just about treating men with basic decency. So all I need to do in return is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 04:39 AM
2

I only date pick me women because in the modern day all it takes to be a pick me woman is not being misandrist and doing kind things for your SO every now and then. So its not that pickme women are inherently valuable, it's just that the rest of the lot are less than worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 03:22 AM
1

Assuming one stays within the confines of the law, nonexistant. Assuming rule breaking, hookers, sugar babies, or other methods can be used to obtain sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 09:31 PM
-2

Suppose I go to a restaurant with a girl. I ordered $10 of food, she orders $90. She suggests we split 50/50. I just paid $40 of her meal, she saved $40. Men going 50/50 still subsidizes women's spending
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 08:17 PM
-6

Women spend more money than men so the man subsidizes the woman's spending
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 08:12 PM
-8

That means she is still saving 50% on all of her bills. This disproportionately effects men because women spend much more money in the economy
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 08:02 PM
4

Women his own age won't love him either, as I previously stated all women use men for their money in one way or another. May as well go for the young hot ones then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 06:25 PM
0

Exactly, because of our gynocentric society.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 03:12 PM
1

if you can give me an RP source saying age gap relationships have more abuse ill believe it. Also the way abuse is defined often underrepresents how often men are abused and overrepresents how often women are abused. So our current stats are no good.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:56 PM
0

So be it. Abuse cannot be properly defined in a gynocentric society. Many BP feminists believe an age gap relationship itself is abuse, therefore it would make the abuse chance of such relationship 100%. So im not trusting any stats from non RP sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:48 PM
-7

Some men aren't opposed to marriage, and if done properly with a young foreign women most worst case scenarios can probably be avoided because foreign women are less likely to know how to abuse the family court system.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:40 PM
0

Nope. All women, regardless of age or financial situation judge men based on their provider status. It is an unescapable reality. Selection bias. Men going to a millionaire matchmaker arent going there to find women they could find swiping right on Tinder. So of course that small group will be searching for women closer to their age.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:39 PM
-3

All women value men based on their wallet. Dating older women does not make men less valued on their wallet. It only gives them a lower quality product they are trading their resources for. Also I agree them going foreign isn't for all men, as it does require a level of cross cultural tolerance. But that same foreign culture is also to your benefit because often they treat their men much better than western women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:00 PM
2

All relationships can be described as everything you just said, just in a less straightforward and transactional way. If a man became unemployed, most women 40 or 20 will leave him. If a woman gets fat, most men 40 or 20 will either get fat themselves or leave them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 01:57 PM
-3

She doesn't face gynocentric and misandrist shaming, where as the man does. So first we must smash gynocentrism and free men from their oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 01:53 PM
4

Society treats them as victims and the men as predators. As is common in most things.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 01:49 PM
-8

I wouldn't call it a failure if both parties accrue benefits from their companionship. If a man wants a younger long term partner the best course of action would be to go for foreign women as they are in the most need of a well established man to help them and larger age gaps may be more common in their cultures.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 01:48 PM
2

We've known the earth is round for thousands of years, and through many different types of cultures. Similarly, we also know women are liars especially when it comes to sex. And you'll see this in nearly all cultures as well. So a better comparison would be my statements are similar to round earth, and the people saying women are all truthful are flat earthers.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 01:46 PM
3

Once we smash gynocentrism and other male shaming tactics you're damn right that's what I'm going to do lmfao. But we first must eradicate misandry and gynocentrism.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 01:42 PM
1

every single piece of data doesnt take into account or call women out for lying to save face or feel good about themselves. Why? Gynocentrism and cancel culture. if a researcher dared to question women's integrity they would be expelled from their academic institution, doxxed online, and hit with 20 false rape accusations from women who have just now "found their voice". Therefore, lies like these are allowed to exist, because women and our society bully and beat up those they disagree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 04:28 AM
26

Women lie about their sexual activity even if their answers are anonymous in order to save face. Men are having less sex, explaining the decrease.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 04:17 AM
1

If they could, they would. But not everyone can afford to do that. Not everyone can afford to leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 08:31 PM
1

No. Men do not benefit from society. It just so happens some men must live in society out of neccesity and deal with the oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 08:23 PM
2

It can solve their problems in many cases but not all. The option exists but is not feasible due to larger structural problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 08:08 PM
3

Because many men have to in order to survive
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 07:55 PM
1

What matters is that the option exists, and that option would solve a systemic societal issue men face.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 07:34 PM
1

Because most don't get romance, they only get sex. So a woman saying she dislikes romance is just a way of her dealing with the fact no men are romantic towards her, or men used to be romantic towards her but aren't anymore because she's older. By reframing this lack of romance into a personal distaste of romance, women are simply trying to protect their image from them looking like they are miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 04:47 PM
2

That's called staying single. It's not WGTOW, because it doesn't exist, and can't exist because women separating themselves from society does not solve any systemic issues for them. Indeed, women do not solve their problems by separating themselves from society, rather they use society's force itself in an authoritarian way to solve them. So no, WGTOW cannot exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 04:45 PM
9

This is a false conclusion. Men do not overate their own attractivness because they are incorrect about their ratings, rather women systemically underrate men's attractivness, therefore if you go by women's rankings all men would be overrating themselves even if they are being honest. Women only give around 10-20% of men an attractiveness rating above a 5 or 6, which is complete nonsense. So it's men who are rating themselves correctly, not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 04:43 PM
15

1.) Theres no such thing as WGTOW in a gynocentric society. Women will not, ever, divorce themselves from a society where they are net tax burdens. Even on an individual level, WGTOW can only rise out of personal problems such as a woman being resentful that her father called her a slut. There are no societal level systemic gender issues that WGTOW solves, as society only acts in the benefit of women in the West. Therefore, WGTOW does not exist. MGTOW, on the other hand, addresses societies prob…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 03:39 AM
–

Most people don't "rise above" anything. They do, however, stop caring about dating and get to be fat and unkempt. This is especially true for women, and it's especially problematic for women. Why? Because being attractive is important for women in both their dating and professional life. Not only will Men will pass up on her if she is 250lbs but she will also be passed on for promotions at work, and undesired by different employers if she is looking to switch jobs to increase her salary. For em…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 08:09 PM
13

"True" feminists are the ones harassing you, and feminism supports the degrading and oppression of men by allowing these supposedly rogue actors to operate under their banner without them putting up any resistance or dedicating any of their political capital to weed out the "bad radicals" Until feminists start calling out and dedicating resources to eject these supposed radicals, I attribute everything they do to the whole movement, as all of them are complicit in their actions because they don'…
/r/AntiFeminists23/03/22 05:52 AM
1

yeah I know. It's quite unfortunate that post modern cultural Marxism and radical feminism and transgenderism runs rampant among modern women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:17 PM
4

None of what you are saying is at issue. The point is she is upset. That's all this post is saying lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:09 PM
1

Too much mileage destroys pair bonding ability
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:08 PM
5

No. He is simply asking, and you are getting upset because you can't measure up to his reasonable standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:28 PM
7

It's you getting upset by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:26 PM
5

Not all standards are reasonable, as that depends on whether someone's standards are commensurate with their own quality. See FemaleDatingStrategy for a prime example of low quality women holding men to high standards as an example of unreasonable standards. However, in this case, asking a woman her count is reasonable. Thus you are getting upset by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:15 PM
7

That is you getting upset about his standards. An employer that doesn't hire a qualified candidate because they asked about salary is upset that they did that. You imposing any kind of consequences for a man having reasonable standards is you getting upset at them for those reasonable standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:12 PM
12

That is literally you getting upset about it lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:08 PM
7

And no one can stop me from making posts judging women for attempting to control my intellectual autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:08 PM
-1

It's not world building. This is real human history. And also why men are stronger and taller and faster than women. Men who got conquered were enslaved and never reproduced. Thus only strong male genes were passed on. Women reproduced whether they got conquered or not, as all women were used by the top males for childbirth, allowing all female genes to pass on barring ones making them extremely ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:00 AM
0

Your tribes men would always have women available to them, because you just spent the last 10 years raiding enemy tribes villages and killing their men and then taking their women as sex slaves. Meaning a successful tribe would have an abundance of women for all the men via conquest. The only men that would go without would be labor slaves from other tribes who would never have sex, simply labor away until they died.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 06:52 AM
1

Women compete against eachother in the harem to be the top woman and run the powerful man's household. That's the most desirable position in the harem. It's no different than how some slaves would rise in the ranks of a plantation and hunt down other slaves in order to keep their own high rank secure and keep in the good favor of the slave master. It's all about self preservation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 06:46 AM
0

No, most men of power had tens if not hundreds of concubines and saw women as nothing more than free labor, sex, and childbirthing. Any action that required labor or complex thinking would be assigned to a man, and societies would use the fewest and strongest men possible to survive, and conquer other societies for their women to be used as sex slaves, and their men to be used as regular labor slaves that would never get access to any women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 06:43 AM
0

Humans lived in harems for most of our history on this planet where one or a group of strong males would take much larger groups of females for themselves and make them submit to them. So yes, they couldn't ever have a man all to themselves, and only got part time attention from a man once and awhile for the sole purpose of bearing his children, so it makes sense for women to evolutionary be more likely to find attraction to other women since that's all most women had for long term partners for …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 06:34 AM
1

This post is about TRP. TRP is at the core of this subreddit. In fact, it's 50% of the subreddits name.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 05:39 PM
1

Read my post.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 04:57 PM
1

Read my post. I described the numerous lifestyles and traditional politics in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 04:54 PM
2

Yes. And this is all with respect to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 04:53 PM
2

Thats nonsensical. It isnt based on what another person does, but based on what society does in general. TRP is fairly traditional In almost all spheres except with respect to women. The only reason they aren't traditional towards women is because women aren't traditional themselves, so may as well not put in the effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 04:12 PM
1

Yes you can, and I see most TRPers actually do be traditional and live more simplistic and anti-consumerist lifestyles.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 04:10 PM
0

I disagree. TRP or at the very least TRPers have a lot of very consistent ideologies such as being anti-government and anti-censorship. It used to be entirely sexual in nature, but has developed over time to be more traditional both politically and socially if you discount how TRP men treat women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 04:09 PM
0

U literally ignored my post entirely. I openly said TRP isn't trad with respect to women. But with respect to all other things TRP is largely traditional
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 04:07 PM
2

you waited literally 2 hours from this post being approved to remove it
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 02:44 PM
3

average RPW summed up in one comment. washed up college whores with nothing to offer, but everything to demand from men. Not as obnoxious as FDS women, but very close.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 07:03 PM
0

Marriage has never been for men. Marriage historically served the family unit, or the political ends of the nobility class. In modern times, marriage only serves the ends of a woman. Women are the only ones who benefit from marriage. Which is why most women hold men hostage in order to get married, threatening to leave or never date men who aren't marriage minded. In other words, men do not get married because they want to, or benefit from it. They are brainwashed by society and manipulated by w…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 05:45 PM
-1

I disagree. Men will always want to spread their seed as much as possible and killing other males and taking their women is an effective strategy to do this. We have always lived in harems where very few men reproduced and the data shows that we have very few male ancestors compared to female ancestors.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 07:58 AM
1

Men have no reproductive rights, yet still seek sex like mad. Women would still have sex, they would just keep having the sex with Chad and the top 10% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 12:51 AM
7

Women are hypergamous by nature, and only seek to date and mate upwards. This means that they will not view their partner as attractive unless they themselves are their partners inferior in most aspects. Men understandably do not like this arrangement, and don't want to comitt to women who are their inferior, so they have sex with them instead, even if they have to lie for it which is justified under the circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 07:44 PM
3

You are describing hypergamy. You are only attracted and wish to be in relationships with men who are your superior. They will not be attracted to you, and see you as a plain, boring, unremarkable girl just as you see men who are your equal as plain men. In other words, you do not wish to settle for a man, you wish for a man to settle for you, but for him to never complain about it. So, hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 07:40 PM
2

No, they don't have to lie. But many men do lie, and it's because they are taking advantage of hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:21 PM
6

No, I never said these things don't exist. This post is about hypergamy, and how women get used for sex because of it. Want to have that discussion? Continue debating that point, otherwise, move along.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:20 PM
4

Men like sex, yes. That has nothing to do with women's hypergamy though. Men take advantage of hypergamy by extracting even more sex out of women that are inferior to them because those women are attempting to hustle to bag a man out of their own league. That gives Men the opportunity to dangle the relationship carrot on a stick to give those women hope that putting out for the guy will lead to something serious. It doesnt, and that's because the woman is the man's inferior. Why is that? Because…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:19 PM
2

She's with a man far above herself for the sole reason that she wants to bag a relationship with him. That is what hypergamy demands of women. So a man can take advantage of this by lying to women inferior to him by dangling the relationship carrot in front of women as a means of getting sex. None of this is contradictory.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:17 PM
2

If you want to actually debate any points I made in the post instead of ranting about TRP that would be great. I can't substantively respond to you unless you substantively respond to my post though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:07 PM
2

Many men have to lie or string women along to obtain sex. Maybe not always, but when you arent presented with your equal men will do whatever possible to obtain sex because it's all they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:05 PM
3

It could certainly be the case that female value has dropped across the board in men's eyes, and I would personally agree with that statement as I think women have declined much more as a group in terms of attractiveness over the last few decades. But the same social pressure that made women more attractive to men was the same pressure preventing them from being hypergamous. Therefore, we saw much less hypergamy and far greater female value if we went back 4 to 5 decades or more.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:05 PM
9

That is called hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:01 PM
3

That is called hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:00 PM
11

Men do want a relationship. From their equal. Under hypergamy, men are denied their equal. Women only date/mate upwards, so men can never obtain commitment from a woman that is his equal, she is always looking higher trying to bag a man far above her own SMV. So instead of committing to a woman below his own SMV, he chooses to lie to her as a means of obtaining sex, and hope that eventually a woman comes along that is his equal he can seek commitment from. That is his most rational choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:00 PM
-2

If a woman is attempting to get into a relationship with a man, that man is almost certainly her superior due to hypergamy. There's something you likely don't know about their partners that makes them their superiors, else their relationship likely wouldn't be happening. For example the woman could have 50 bodies on her, or the man could be a secret millionaire.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 09:12 AM
9

Any lie a man has to tell is in response to hypergamy. He would love a relationship with a woman who is his equal but hypergamy denied him this. As evidenced in the exercise above, most men's only path to sex is by committing to a woman several ranks below his own SMV. so it makes much more sense then to lie and promise commitment just to obtain sex while trying to look for real love with your equal. And sure some women want fuck buddies but women seeking pure fuck buddies usually punch far high…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 09:10 AM
7

They don't. Men want to love and commit to a woman who is his equal. Hypergamy doesn't allow this, and is the root cause of men using women for sex. Some men are lucky to get to be with their equals and find love, but because of hypergamy many men don't have that option.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 09:01 AM
8

Women practice hypergamy because it's a biological reality. Men react to this biological reality with their own. That is, if a man isn't presented with an option that is sufficiently his equal, he will wait around until one is open. And guess what? Men like sex. So may as well have some sex with those women below your SMV to kill some time while you wait. There's no ill will or manipulation. Sure maybe you need to tell a lie or promise commitment, but it's only a response to being shorted an equ…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:59 AM
6

No one is avoiding any responsibility, nor did I ever say women lied to any men. I'm giving a simple biological explanation for a situation many women find themselves in. Their own hypergamy leads them to being used. It isnt men's fault, it's hypergamy that causes it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:49 AM
14

And he doesn't love her because she isn't his equal. Why? Hypergamy. See above post for explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:44 AM
1

Yeah I've had that happen before. PPD mods take down a lot of my posts for BS, even though I follow most of the rules
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:39 AM
9

Men do this because of hypergamy. And hypergamy is practiced by women. So women are the root cause of this happening as evidenced by the exercise in my post.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:38 AM
11

Not at issue in my post. My post is about how hypergamy is the root cause of men using women for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:37 AM
8

What you say isn't an "or". Of course the superior men are lying and stringing along women for sex. If you are only using a woman for sex, there's no downside to lying to her. And the only reason you are using her for sex is because that's all she has to offer, because of hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:31 AM
-1

Thats hypergamy my friend
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:13 AM
5

I'm going to bed soon but I fully expect to wake up to many insults and personal attacks framed as arguments lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:10 AM
5

No, we don't all settle. MGTOW. If women want to be little hoes and jump on every cock on the carousel, they are legally free to do so. But what they aren't free from are the consequences from doing so. They have no right to complain when men don't want to settle for them once they are finished with that and are horribly low quality. Better to go MGTOW than to be with one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 06:07 PM
-1

Out of all the political ideologies that exist among most women, leftism is definitely the worst. Or at the very least it breeds/attracts the worst kind of women to it. I much prefer apolitical women, or if not apolitical slightly leaning conservative women. But in any case not too opinionated as that is very annoying. Especially when they feel the need to always hear themselves speak, which is common among leftists and feminists and is probably directly caused by narcissism.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:48 AM
-1

I dont really discriminate in my use of the like feature unless I see something in a profile that is utterly repugnant like a half shaved bald head. So I end up with a lot of fat, leftist, and feminist women who would match with me. I would either leave them as matches and not message, or message and eventually unmatch when I figure out they don't meet basic standards of female decency. A bar that is quite literally on the damn floor I might add.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:44 AM
2

I haven't been on OLD for a bit, but when I was on I could easily amass 50+ matches in the span of a few weeks, sure. And many messages and conversations. The problem? Fat chicks. All of them were fat chicks. I rarely discriminated in who I swiped right on so I ended up with a match list full of overweight women. In other words, I didn't really want to date 80% of the women I matched with on OLD. As for the other women, they either wouldn't respond back to me or make no effort in the conversatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:34 AM
1

When determining who "settles" the relative valuation is all that matters, not absolute value. A man could be a 5 or 6, but if he ends up with a 3 or 4 (due to hypergamy for example) that means he settled for her. Most men tend to settle for women, contrary to societies belief that its actually the other way around. Hypergamy demands this be true, in fact. So a single mother on her 3rd marriage is definitely a 1 or a 2, regardless of her looks, and even a 3 or 4 of a man would be settling for he…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 03:02 PM
5

TRP does not need to give any data nor studies. The lived experiences of men are enough, suggesting otherwise is misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 02:58 PM
3

A woman on her 2nd or 3rd marriage isn't settling for anyone, she is being settled for. Hence why she tolerates a larger age gap, because men her own age don't want to be her 2nd or 3rd ex husband, therefore those men will either date women with cleaner history or younger women of the same sort. The only men she can bag are the men older than her, willing to tolerate her bad history specifically because they get to be with a younger woman because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 02:52 PM
16

The problem with this analogy is that the startup company needed to give away loads of its equity early on to attract the best talent to get it off the ground, while the humble employee worked for scraps while always advancing his own credentials, experience, and educaiton. Now that start-up has "matured" all of a sudden they say: We're not that kind of company anymore, we can't just give away equity to hard working employees! You only get a WAGE, you hear me? A WAGE! WE KNOW OUR WORTH! Don't th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 02:37 AM
2

Alpha Fucks, Beta Buxx
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 10:29 PM
7

AF/BB is inherently manipulative, regardless of the subjective intent of its user.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 06:41 PM
13

You are simply describing the female manipulation tactic AF/BB, which has been known in the TRP space for decades.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 05:14 PM
11

I'm not doing anything except existing in a gynocentric society that only acts to serve female interests
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 05:04 PM
8

nope. Creep = Ugly. It's not based on a man's actions, its based on their looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 04:43 PM
5

They want to be approached, but if you are ugly they will dox you on social media and get you thrown in prison for being a "creep".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 04:19 PM
3

Men who care about what women think about them are much more physically attractive than they used to be. And these physically attractive men don't want commitment from all the women they bed, only the ones just as good looking as them. However, it should be noted that many more men don't care what women think about them, this includes men separating from women (MGTOW) and men who are demanding more rights and respect from women (Men's Rights.) More and more men are falling into this latter categ…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:17 PM
1

I don't mind being called a psychopath or retard, but plz don't make fun of autistic people because of me
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 04:06 PM
1

I'm probably also slightly on the spectrum yeah lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 04:02 PM
6

For what it's worth, I've been described as a sociopath on this subreddit before but given how calculating I am I believe I would constitute more of a psychopath when it comes to dating and pill theory. I derive quite a lot of enjoyment knowing that IRL women have no way of knowing I'm red pill. Like I'm Light Yagami hiding the fact he is Kira from L in death note. Using RP knowledge and values covertly to further my own interests all while the other party doesn't suspect a thing. I'm even smili…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 04:01 AM
2

You did do all of those things. They are the logical consequences of the commandment you suggested.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 12:15 AM
2

I never put words in your mouth. Already explained my reasoning behind necessary logical conclusions so at this point you're ranting in bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 12:10 AM
2

No. But you did just prove your real intent with this post, and the fact you feebly attempted to create a shield for slutty women. Which won't happen. But thanks for clearing up your intentions! :)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 11:53 PM
2

It's a necessary implication of society adopting this commandment. Unless there is a clause specifically enumerating men's moral right to judge women's actions, this commandment would necessarily prevent them from doing so without adverse action such as societal scorn.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 11:41 PM
1

By creating a commandment that absolves women of any responsibility for their sexual pasts, you are necessarily supporting the opposition to men who attempt to hold women accountable for their actions. You cannot create a position of sexual impunity, then claim I am straw manning you. If you really aren't attempting to do this, then write a second sentence in your commandment that specifically enumerates the moral righteousness of men who attempt to hold women accountable for their sexual decisi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 11:35 PM
1

1.) You wouldn't consider creating the commandment unless it served your interests. if it didn't, it would not be created. 2.) Attempting to create and hold above others a form of morality that you believe to be better is an attempt at convincing them to convert to your values. A failed one, but an attempt all the same. 3.) You are attempting to push a higher moral standard that society should impose that rather than shaming women for having tons of sex when they are young, we should shame men w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 11:25 PM
2

Everyone has different morals. You can attempt to create your own "flawless" moral compass, but the only reason you perceive it as flawless is because it serves all your own interests flawlessly. Someone else is going to disagree with your "commandment", and they have the right to do so. So no matter how much work you spend refining this, actions will always have consequences. And that is the only truism in this world, and the only commandment we ALL live by. Actions have consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 11:08 PM
1

Virtually all the soldiers I've seen in combat situations have been entirely male.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 07:27 PM
0

true but some weight number is still better than no number
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 10:32 PM
2

TRP was born in response to rising societal gynocentrism and double standards towards men. FDS was born out of a misandrist hate community that disliked how men only "chase" after attractive women, and that unattractive women have to actually put in effort for their relationship like men. In other words, they believe men and women should not be equal, women should hold privileges over men, and all women should hold these privileges, not just the attractive ones. Hence, why they are misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 06:18 PM
0

All money is fungible, so child support really is just free money to the mother so she can blow it on indulgences for herself. I would estimate that the majority of child support money likely goes to alcohol, especially wine because "mommy's has a tough day! She deserves this to relax."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:33 AM
1

BS
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 02:18 AM
5

The top 0.0001% is male majority, but below them is the female population, and at the very bottom are 99.99% of men who are the slaves for society that transfer assets to women to keep our society going. That is why we our gynocentric, because 99.9% of men aren't in power, and the government only acts to make the lives of women better.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 12:16 AM
4

Men's value has been going down over time due to systemic misandry and gynocentrism. Fixing those issues will fix men's problems in the modern age.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 12:03 AM
4

As I said before, having casual sex as a man shows effort and quality. So a man having casual sex would not convey anything negative since he had to put in work for it to get it. Women do not have to put in work. They just exist, and open their legs. Hence why they are disgusting for doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 12:02 AM
4

Women as a group have become low quality over time. What was bottom 33% in the past has now expanded to 5/6. That doesn't mean women aren't in the bottom third, it just means more women need to accommodate the bottom third in quality despite being over it in numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 11:57 PM
3

Well, the thing is that overall I actually prefer to handle my sexual needs myself. I do have a girlfriend, but a jerk off regularly at least 3-4 times a day, and even more than that back when I was single. This is to say that I don't really enjoy physical sex with females all that much, or all that much more than just handling the matter myself. But what I do despise, and find absolutely putrid are sluts. The thought of putting my d*ck inside of their withered, pounded up vagina with 200,000 mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 11:55 PM
1

Yes. A man who sleeps with many women has great value, as men need to be in the top 10% and put in effort to obtain casual sex. Whereas a woman needs to put in zero effort outside of opening her legs. In other words, a man being able to get casual sex makes him in the top 20% of men, where as a woman opening her legs to beg for casual sex puts her in the bottom 33% of women, and quite frankly disgusts me. Have ghosted many a women myself after determining a large possibility of hoeing in their p…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 11:44 PM
-1

Western countries are gynocentric. Patriarchy has not existed in the West for more than 50 years. Men are being left behind, and we WILL change our culture and country to benefit average men and end female privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 11:39 PM
11

With respect to 4, you are incorrect. Look at graduation rates and labor force participation rates among men. In particular, look at the trends. Men have been trending down in both these metrics for some time, largely due to systemic misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 11:36 PM
7

TRP already tells men women lie to them about n count. So regardless of whether women tell the truth, men need to assume they are being lied to. Rather, they need to figure out her count using his own observations and intelligence. It's based on this independent determination that the man chooses whether or not he wishes to proceed with the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 11:34 PM
0

Anything over 3 would be high.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 11:20 PM
4

2 Reasons: One for top 20% men, another for bottom 80% men. Top 20% men: Availability of women. Why would a man lock himself down to one woman when he can easily have three, four, or even more? It doesn't make any sense, and most women are more than willing to share Chad rather than being exclusive with Billy. So the result of this is that very few women, if any get to be truly exclusive with Chad. Bottom 80% men: Women withholding sex due to being an alpha widow is a huge one here. The Billy Be…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 06:36 PM
2

Not every man can become an alpha. Being an alpha is equal parts effort and talent. You need to be born with certain genes to be one. Being a better Beta is entirely possible though, and should be encouraged. They will never be alphas, but at least they can push back against gynocentrism.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 06:31 PM
2

The part of Red Pill that matters most is the part that tells men not to get married, and only associate with women in order to extract a benefit from them (e.g. sex). This is the most correct part of it. Why? Because of the hoe phase, hypergamy, and AF/BB. No reason to commit or get married when women have the full ability to participate in all of those things in our current society without consequence.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 03:09 PM
1

Redpill has and will always be the truth. When women try and refute the RedPill, they typically either attack the man personally or try to demand scientific sources for obvious phenomenon that everyone knows happens IRL. Just because the average RP man isn't a scientist, and just because science is gynocentric and doesn't produce RP studies doesn't mean RP isn't correct. Thats why they never actually refute the argument. Just a bunch of nonsense and personal attacks, just to try and maintain the…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 03:06 PM
-2

Doesn't put up with female nonsense. Doesn't take orders from his mother, and doesn't put their mother or the idea of motherhood on a pedestal. Eats well, healthy body weight. Does not need to lift or be ripped, although this is an option for men who have the time to hit the gym. Well educated, but in a useful field and harshly opposes the culture coming out of universities in the modern era. They should also not hold a large amount of debt to obtain this education. Works a good job and lives wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 12:23 AM
2

I've been called a sociopath many times on this subreddit, and I don't neccesarily disagree with that description. And I am quiet and reserved individual, so I dont give off creepy vibes. (I won't even touch on your use of the misandrist term "creep") Also, I have a girlfriend to boot. I do genuinely take enjoyment knowing the me I present to the world is merely an alter ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 06:19 PM
2

Most women would likely consider me a HVM based on my appearance and how I behave IRL. It would honestly terrify most women if they realized how I was Red Pill online, because my IRL behavior is a 180 from this. That's the key to using successful RP strategies. Never allow them to suspect you are RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 03:20 PM
11

They should end up alone TBH. They are all low value women, and don't come close to being good enough for a "high value man". I hope they end up alone not because I hate FDS or FDS women, but because I don't want some poor man to feel their abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 03:13 PM
3

One of the key elements of hypergamy is women systemically overestimating their own value. Which we are perfectly seeing here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 05:52 AM
2

You having high standards doesn't make you high quality. Billy Beta is your equal. So if all those things are true of him, they are true of you as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 05:50 AM
1

Billy Beta is average. He is not ugly, he just isn't Chad. Billy Beta might be a 60% man. All he wants is a 60% woman. But that 60% woman, despite being Billy's equal shares Chad with 20 other women because she believes the man she beds is a reflection of her own value. It isnt. And that will become abundantly clear once she is post wall and Billy wants little to do with her anymore because of the choices she made in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 05:46 AM
2

No. I want to educate girls on hypergamy so they don't spend half of their lives in Chad's rotation only to find that: 1.) They aren't attracted to Billy Beta because she's alpha widowed And 2.) Billy Beta isn't remotely attracted to her because she either spent years being a little hoe, or has Chad's child. (They are a package deal, you know.)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 05:41 AM
2

Thats where education from young age would have to come into play. If we teach young girls about hypergamy we can teach them to control the animal instinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 05:38 AM
5

Abolish the welfare state would be the only viable solution in a modern country. Women are not net taxpayers. So cutting off their welfare will make them have to treat men with more respect and take men more seriously rather than living off the government while sitting in Chad's harem. That, and increased female education on hypergamy. Teach young girls about hypergamy from a young age and tell them to control their natural desire to be in Chad's harem. If we assume ourselves in an authoritarian…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 05:35 AM
4

Because women seek to extract value out of men, and TRP stops them from doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 03:13 AM
22

No. Saying it's too risky to be with a TRP male is the equivalent of saying it's too risky to be with a woman who takes self defense classes. Don't be a POS and you'll be fine. Be good to your man and TRP will never effect you. The only women who need be wary of TRP are women attempting to take advantage of men (e.g. AF/BB)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 02:59 AM
2

Most places that have decriminalized it have done so in a misandrist way. That is, they won't punish the woman for selling it but they will punish and publicly humiliate the man for buying it. Which should serve as further proof for our gynocentric society.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 02:34 AM
2

My issue is that I could be arrested for it, and the women who sell sex are always insanely low quality unless you're looking to shell out thousands for a high end hooker
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 02:26 AM
47

Women aren't meant to like TRP. That's the point. TRP brings value to men, and is a strategy used by men to reclaim their masculinity from society, and smash gynocentrism.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 01:52 AM
7

Why are men the only ones expected to improve? Instead of concluding men from 30th to 90th percentile need to improve, start saying women need to be less hypergamous and bring something to the table themselves. (No, they are not "the table".)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 01:17 AM
48

Shes just describing how alpha widowed women are miserable post wall since Chad would never commit to her. It turns out that being girl #7 in Chad's rotation wasn't a good long term strategy. And she can't feel anything toward Billy Beta anymore because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 12:55 AM
-2

Women of this sort typically always feel obliged to tell the world that they are happy, and never admit to being unhappy in the slightest. This is a tactic. The reality is that these women are very lonely, and they require more women to choose lives like them so that their friends won't marry and have children, therefore leaving the childless woman without any friends to be with or a partner or children. By hyping up singlehood and having no kids, they hope that they will have more friends as a …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 11:48 PM
-1

FBoys by definition are High Value Men. Men have to work and be attractive to get sex. So a man who gets a lot of sex is high value. And yes, OLD has many men like this. The opposite cannot be said for women, since a woman can have sex whenever she wants and has to put in no work.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 08:56 PM
1

it makes sense though
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 07:15 PM
-1

I produce quality posts for this sub. why would i get banned?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 05:46 PM
0

No because men weren't selected on the basis of their asses
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 05:09 PM
3

oh yes i can
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 04:08 AM
2

men cant get sex because of systemic misandry and hypergamy. Survey was conducted incorrectly and kept in obese and feminist women when they should have been excluded.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 10:29 PM
1

Women age without locking down a man and complain about men poaching younger women because they aged horribly and can't attract Chad anymore. No. It is all women. Some women just make horrible decisions and they pay the price for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 10:21 PM
4

Yeah of course. All of those women took actions that made them unfuckable though, so I dont have any sympathy for them. Where as with men we start out as unworthy and must prove ourselves, women start out with everything and slowly lose it over time due to their own horrible decision making skills. I dont seethe over anything. I just seek to hold women accountable for the actions that make them unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 10:16 PM
4

Even Chad has some standards when it comes to weight. At a certain point a woman gets so disgustingly obese she can't even have sex anymore. Also some may be the feminist types who hate men so much they can't handle the thought of pleasuring one with sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 10:09 PM
10

In your opinion sure, but as far as this survey goes they count them as winners
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 10:04 PM
4

nah. men can buy sex with money either directly or indirectly. where as an obese woman is simply useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 08:38 PM
8

Well duh women lie about their sexual past constantly, even to themselves. Also, many of those non sexual women are obese so they shouldn't really count in the numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 08:05 PM
2

Apolitical and intelligent women are always the most stable and have the healthiest lives. That is my current girlfriend as well, and I feel very fortunate to be with someone who is highly intelligent, but not loud mouthed or opinionated. Outside of this, leftist women are worse because they have feminists and SJWs. Not to mention communists as well. Not a big fan of right wing religious women, but compared to the leftists they are much better.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 07:33 PM
12

MGTOW. Autistic men already outnumber autistic women, and most autistic women are repulsed by autistic men because of hypergamy. Autistic women would rather date neurotypical men who just want an easy lay than an autistic man genuinely looking for someone to be with. Dating non-autistic people is almost a nonstarter because they won't be able to understand you on any emotional level.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 06:29 PM
-1

CHAD
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 05:58 AM
3

Not in our lifetimes. But in the next few hundred years conservative culture will begin to dominate the Earth as leftist minded people fail to reproduce and separate themselves from religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 12:42 AM
2

The amish have an extremely high retention rate at around 80-90%. Also losing a few kids from amish culture doesn't matter very much when the fertility rate among women is 7 children. You could lose 2 of them and still have 5 kids replacing 2 parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 12:30 AM
2

their fertility rates have been pretty constant over time. Their population has quadrupled over the last 30-40 years. In some states like Indiana they are already close to 1% of the total population.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 10:13 PM
1

I did some calculations once and I found that Amish people will number around half the US population by 2200 because of their insanely high fertility rate. So what you say is absolutely true. Conservatives preserve their culture via strong social institutions and high fertility rates keeping it alive. So long as conservatives keep their fertility high enough, they win given enough time.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 10:03 PM
-1

nah its not exploitative. it's just shameful for the woman, and absolutely Chad and awesome for the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 01:59 AM
10

well of course men wouldn't want that for their own daughter. Men will use all sorts of manipulative tactics on women when they are young, but then try and advise and protect their own daughters from that same behavior because they know exactly what guys are trying to do. Men want to be the man that is 40 with four 20 year old babes on his dick. They don't want to have a daughter and then know their daughter is with that man. Because he knows that man is just extracting value from her, because t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 01:57 AM
44

The people who claim to care are primarily women, and they will give their reason for caring as them trying to protect younger women from older men. The reality is these women, as they age, have begun to see all the strong and successful men around them continue to thrive and prosper, but instead of sharing their lives with women their own age they date younger for a more fertile partner with less baggage. Being a 35 year old women working in the same department as an uber successful, handsome m…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 12:14 AM
13

Nah. RP is still correct for nearly all men, and BP isn't correct for any men, it's just that for the top 20% of men they don't need RP. Just because these top 20% men don't adopt red pill means that they automatically become blue pill. That's not how it works. Red Pill is still the correct ideology, and BP men come usually use false BP narratives as a means of simping for women to increase their RMV to make up for lack of looks, status or money. I've never heard any legitimate argument refuting…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 04:34 AM
2

When I was about 12.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 11:02 PM
11

yup this entire post reeks of HUGE misandry. Implying women don't need to "do" anything, rather just expect things from men, while men have to "do" everything for women while expecting nothing and being happy with what they get. Well I'll tell you what a man's duty is. To expect more of women. And a woman's expectations should be to expect her to do more for men. How about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 07:44 PM
-1

No. The women are always past sluts regardless so it doesn't matter where you meet them originally. You need to presume they were a slut, and extract sufficient value to justify the relationship given that shortcoming.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 01:25 AM
1

Womem get affirmative action and daddy government which keeps them alive until death. Men do what we do best and be bosses making good money, even more if there isn't a woman around. So men will always make the moolah, despite institutional misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 02:27 PM
1

Already said I won't tolerate you invalidating the lived experiences of men. That's misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 07:12 AM
2

Lived experienced of men who attest to women getting affirmative action and daddy government benefits are enough to validate that as true. Again u dont refute what I say so it stands as the truth until you refute it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 07:04 AM
2

Yes they are credible sources you dingus. It's called a first person account and they are cited all the time. It's like if someone asked you whether you ever heard an RPer say hypergamy is caused by leftist and feminism and they said you couldn't cite what I just said. Its nonsense. And no you don't refute anything I said so what I said still stands. If you want to change that rebut my points instead of insulting creators in the positive men's community.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 06:43 AM
3

When women are dependent on men being better and pleasing their hypergamy is easy af since they have nothing. Now that they have shit mostly given to them via affirmative action and daddy government men can't keep up with them demanding 200k a year salary with a paid off house just because they have a 60k a year government diversity job or work HR in a company.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 06:11 AM
1

That is not reality
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 06:00 AM
10

Hypergamy has become AMPLIFIED by modern feminism and leftism among women. Self proclaimed feminist socialists that grew up with rich fathers are much more hypergamous than down to earth lower middle class apolitical/conservative women. The former wants a man who is 6 foot 5, high income, well educated, owns house and car, and matches their politics in every way. While the former mostly just wants a man who won't yell at them or beat them. The less feminist and left wing a woman is, the less hyp…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 01:14 AM
1

I do? I even have a girlfriend as well. I masturbate very often but it's never gotten in the way of my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 03:39 AM
1

If you space them out properly not really. If you want to maximize the number of times you have to start once when you wake up in the morning and again right before bed. You can squeeze the rest in through the day pretty easily I find.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 03:36 AM
1

I find it easiest to think about RP ideas and theorize on RP subjects after whacking it. I'm still pretty young so I can whack it multiple times a day without running into any issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 03:34 AM
8

men care about N count because women don't have to put any effort to get sex. So obtaining sex for a woman says nothing about her desirability, it only adds to her baggage. Women don't care about n count because doing so would exclude most of the top men, since these top men get all of the sex. A woman who holds an n count standard prices herself out of the top 20%, where as a man who holds an n count standard prices himself out of the bottom third of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/22 10:52 PM
-3

He doesn't need to marry younger, he just needs to date younger. This allows him to age and get a young woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/22 10:38 PM
16

Most women have high physical standards, but low standards for any man who meets their physical standards. This is because of AF/BB. Will put out for Chad immediately but she's gotta make Billy Beta hustle to get Chad's leftovers.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 06:50 PM
50

Correct, and it's hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:57 PM
7

It's a free country, of course you can do this. But you're a hypocrite, and I will proudly say that with certainty.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:41 PM
3

Impact is not at issue in this post. I do not care whether someone subjectivly belives their past matters. What I care about, and what this post is about is whether someone DISALLOWS someone from considering certain aspects of their past, while advocating of the ALLOWANCE of others based on what is beneficial or detrimental to them in a hypocritical manner. If the past matters, then a man can act on that past and judge the woman based on it without consequence, if the past doesn't matter, see th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:38 PM
6

It's not a false dilemma. Suggesting the past matters, then specifically excluding the parts of your past that are detrimental to you is utter hypocrisy. And I'm calling women out on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:35 PM
9

Impact is not at issue in this post. It is allowance or disallowance of the past. If the past matters, all of your past matters. If it doesn't, then none of it matters. Impact of an event is not at issue in this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:33 PM
21

It appears you believe the past does matter then! I expect you to be consistent with that belief.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:32 PM
6

This is the last time I will say it. Impact is not at issue in this post. This post is about the allowance and disallowance of aspects of ones past. I will not respond to any further appeal's to the subjective impact of an event.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:28 PM
1

Either the past matters, or it doesn't. But what won't be allowed is women who try to disallow some things in their past from being used against them while saying other things are allowed when it is to their benefit to allow them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:27 PM
5

It is subjective because it's your own worldview and opinion leading you to that conclusion, where as whether something should be allowed or disallowed is objective because either the past matters or it doesn't. This post does not deal with subjective impact. That is not at issue here. At issue is whether the past matters, or whether it doesn't. And whether some things should be ALLOWED, while others DISALLOWED. This has no regard to impact. It is hypocritical to suggest some things in the past …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:26 PM
1

Again, as I have repeatedly stated numerous times your subjective belief as to the impact of an event in your past is not at issue. It's whether some actions should be allowed to be considered while others are disallowed, regardless of subjective belief to their impact.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:22 PM
8

Your subjective belief as to the impact of an event is not at issue here. It's whether some aspects of the past are allowed while others are disallowed. Regardless of subjective belief as to their impact.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:21 PM
8

Your subjective belief is not at issue here. It's whether some things should be allowed or disallowed, regardless of subjective belief to what their impact was.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:18 PM
2

It does work indeed, you just aren't happy with the outcome because it's detrimental to women. And no, if women want the past to matter, a man acting upon the past when it matters cannot have that held against him.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:17 PM
1

Whether you subjectively believe something matters is not at issue. It's whether some things should be allowed, while others disallowed less you call them men considering them derogatory names such as "insecure". If some things are to be allowed, then all things must be allowed and any man acting on something can do so without any consequences or labels attached to him. If the past doesn't matter. then see the post above for explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:14 PM
8

Nope. It's exactly the same. You don't get to pick and choose which aspects of your past matter and which don't. It either matters, or it doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:10 PM
5

OK. Then you agree that a womans past does matter and the man is not insecure because he is acting on something that occured in the past then?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:09 PM
21

Individual X believes that their past does not define them. Individual X then turns their back on that statement and allows certain things in their past to effect them when it suits them to do so, disallowing anything that would be detrimental to them. That is hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:08 PM
1

Whether or not something that matters has a large or small impact is not at issue. What is at issue is what things can be considered having an impact, or whether some things should be disallowed while others are allowed, and who exactly gets to make that decision. It is inappropriate to suggest some things are off limits based on what the woman believes can be a detriment to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:06 PM
12

You don't get to pick and choose which parts of your past matter and which don't based on whether you can accrue a benefit based on it mattering. Either it does, or it doesn't. You pick.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 11:00 PM
6

All's fair in love and war my friend. They lined themselves up for this "gotcha" so I don't really care about using it to my advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 10:55 PM
10

I only said it doesn't matter if I initially agreed to a statement I felt was fundamentally flawed. In suggesting that ignoring the past is ignorant you just agreed with my criticism of the female/blue pilled view of sexual history.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 10:51 PM
2

Men want to live more traditional lives when they are young, while women tend to subscribe to AF/BB which makes them embrace a modern lifestyle while they are young, but want to fall back into traditionalism as they age. This disillusions many men, however, as they never got to be traditional growing up. So they remain conservative in nature but let go of any traditionalism when interacting with older women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 08:29 PM
-1

i mean i could cite a source but that source would be myself
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 05:19 AM
-1

well I typically don't cite any sources because I don't have any sources to begin with. intelligence comes from the mind my friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 05:12 AM
1

PUAs are only a small portion of the red pill community. MGTOW lite men and regular guys that have sworn off marriage are much more common. For the most part they are indistinguishable from non RP men and don't "spin plates" as you describe.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 05:32 AM
3

Just did. The only similarity between red pill and black pill is that they are both predominantly male and body focus on men's issues. Outside of that they share almost no similarities.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 05:28 AM
1

Incel is black pill, not red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 05:08 AM
6

Well growing up very few people did like me and I'm rather asocial to this day. That doesn't stop me from having a GF I just have to be very selective in my partner so as to avoid woke leftists, sluts, and feminists. I don't idolize any public figures and I have no clue who that is. But I do love the new Joker character from Joker 2019.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 12:26 AM
10

Just because a man is incapable of love doesn't mean he is TRP. I have always been more abrasive, even before I found TRP in the early 2010s. Also most men, myself included, can put on a pretty good act to convince a woman we experience all the emotions and act irrationally instead of logically
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 12:18 AM
2

If you liked a man before you knew he was TRP, and left him solely because you found out that he consumed TRP content and no other reason, then you are only leaving him because he wishes to defend himself. It would be the equivalent of a man leaving a woman because he found self defense videos in her browser history. Which isn't justified, and a good sign that woman was seeking to take advantage of the man. So good riddance.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 12:16 AM
9

Well, you certainly described my views. There is no such thing as love. If there was such thing as love, I would have seen a woman fall in love with a homeless man by now in my life. Or is it just a coincidence that harems of women just so happen to "fall in love" with the man with a mansion and a yacht instead? Bullshit. Utter bullshit. There is no love. There are only men who can give something to a woman, and that woman extracts what she needs until she's done and then she moves on. That's al…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 12:11 AM
-1

I just Googled it and people say she wears a d cup bra which was my first instinct based on her size. But again she isn't busty with just a d cup. Need bigger than double Ds with a small waist
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 07:45 PM
5

She wears a lot of conservative clothing presumably so she isn't objectified but you can still see her tits popping out when she wears some form fitting dresses
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 07:41 PM
0

Agree. AOC likely has solid D cups but I would say a woman has to be bigger than double Ds with a slim waist to be considered busty, bare minimum. Fat boobs dont count of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 07:23 PM
3

Good luck with that. I'm the dictator so I'll just send out my secret police and snuff out dissidents in the night.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 06:56 PM
-6

1.) I become the Dictator 2.) All property becomes property of the State (me) 3.) Ban on any education that leads a reasonable mind to misandrist conclusions. Any educator found advocating for misandry or male expendability will be imprisoned. 4.) All working aged men are guaranteed a job and a livable wage. Women will be allowed to work but no income guaranteed. 5.) You must be married by age 25, if you are not married by age 25 you will be assigned a partner and you must have at least 2 childr…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 05:53 PM
7

get ready for a bunch of throwaway accounts so women dont expose themselves on their mains
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 03:58 PM
1

To combat Misandry we must give up some facts and promote fictions. Once misandry is dead and gynocentrism is conquered we can explain why we disregarded the facts and begin reimplementing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 03:10 AM
0

not ignore. But representation must be equitable to ensure that we counter gynocentrism.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 09:12 PM
-1

yes but Anti-Misandry helps men more. Which must be the priority to counter gynocentrism.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 09:05 PM
-2

only a small portion of women are killed by men. Most men are killed by other men, and by themselves via suicide. Anti-Misandry would help men far more than it would be detrimental to women. In fact it probably wouldnt be detrimental at all, it would just take the focus off of women and towards men which our gynocentric society doesnt like.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 08:37 PM
-4

being anti-misandrist is more important than making representation match exactly what crime stats say
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 08:31 PM
-2

TrueCrime does promote a lot of misandry. More anti-misandrist efforts should be made to require TrueCrime series to have gender parity in their representation of criminals.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 08:01 PM
1

Women want chad to themselves, thats why they hate polygamy. women dont like being plates, but Chad holds all the power and makes them his plates since the woman hates Billy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 08:00 PM
1

We do have informal polygamy. Chad has unlimited access to women and spins plates like crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:51 PM
1

Well its literally just that. Chad is Chad. Billy is Billy
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:16 PM
1

yes it does. Chad is Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:49 PM
1

He's chad
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:45 PM
19

AF/BB Sexual around Chad, but they gotta make Billy Beta put in work to get Chad's leftovers. They dont even get aroused by Billy, they just use him for stability and resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:27 PM
2

nah our gynocentric society focuses on womens feelings on all things. Includes objectification. Gynocentrism affirms womens feelings when they are objectified but does nothing for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:25 PM
-1

No. Society readily values everything women say. Women can falsely accuse a man of sexual assault and she'll be put on national TV (e.g. Brett Kavanaugh case) No one cares how that effects the man, they only value the woman. Thats how gynocentrism works.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:21 PM
1

nope. AF/BB. Theres no such thing as a woman who doesnt like sex. She will just only open her legs for Chad. Billy Beta needs to work to get sex from her, which explains his struggle and why she doesn't even like having sex with Billy. Because she misses being with the alpha Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:17 PM
3

men dont really get upset at the women themselves for this. They get upset when people say women don't value men for money (denial), or don't view their negative feelings towards those women as valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:08 PM
200

HVM, LVM, NVM. It doesn't matter. Not a male being on Earth has anything to gain from dating an FDS woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 01:49 AM
1

Yes. I do not wish to be married, so a forever girlfriend (assuming she isn't a former slut, feminist, SJW, etc.) is exactly what I want.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 12:15 AM
1

My dream job in an ideal world would be a Kim Jong Un style dictator where I ruled a country with an iron fist. In such a situation I could have a harem of pleasure woman throughout my entire life, and a relationship as well. So in my ideal world I really wouldn't have to choose between the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 01:44 AM
5

not really what I said
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 09:18 PM
4

I dont honestly think unattractive women are entitled to the privileges of their attractive counterparts, as in a world of true equality such privilege would not exist. It's interesting that you don't see equality movements try and strip these privileges away from attractive women though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 08:15 PM
1

alright
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 07:57 PM
1

so if I took it out it would be allowed?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 07:55 PM
–

It matters a lot. Do not listen to women's preferences when determining this. Look at men's dating results.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 05:00 PM
3

I swear the women of ppd never read any of my comments
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 12:22 AM
6

Yes. That's the long and short of it. A 40 year old successful man has his pick of the litter. So he can date a 25 year old. He doesn't need a 40 year old woman that's aging and has tons of baggage with a long sexual history. He much prefers the younger option. The only man a 30-40 year old can get is either much older than her, or someone who physically is much less attractive than her. So she will not get someone who is her age, physically attractive, and a good provider for children. She will…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 09:23 PM
5

Men who don't put in work will always be on the bottom. Men as a group don't care whether women put in work or become well educated. Therefore, the Men with education and good jobs will seek out any women that meets their criteria (good looks, pleasant to be around, young) without regard to how they have lived their lives professionally. Of course, how they've lived their live in terms of sexual partners and drug abuse is highly relevant. This is to say that women all seek hard working well educ…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 09:13 PM
4

bang maid
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 06:14 AM
1

If you define a marriage as transactional, sure. I personally would do so since all women are prostitutes whether they realize it or not, but as a blue piller your pill color typically views marriage as non transactional and better than sugar baby ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 03:49 AM
1

A successful man will have a line of woman out the door attempting for a chance at getting a ring from a successful and prestigious man. Women would much rather share Chad than have Billy all to herself. Even if she knows who he is and what he does, she will convince herself that she can change him in order to secure Chad at the finish line.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 03:47 AM
1

No, I took out the harem of women part. Even the top 25-35% of men could realistically achieve this if they avoided marriage, unfortunately most don't so they are stuck with one woman and can't do a trade in. Which of course will cause them to fall out of shape and become complacent and less attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 03:38 AM
0

The facts I've described, sure. But a man with resources that keeps in shape can easily land an early to mid 30s woman who wants a child and provider well into his late 40s. And a man in his mid to late 30s can easily secure a woman in her mid to late 20s as well so long as he has been successful in his career and can almost certainly trade in his partner as she gets older and his value increases into his 40s. He would need to avoid marriage to execute this plan though. The general point overall…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 03:33 AM
0

He can do this, he can also do this while pursuing a less transactional relationship with an older woman in her late 20s as well. His options are limitless.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 03:20 AM
1

If a man is happy using his prestige and success to maintain a harem of 20 year old fuck-things while relaxing on his yacht, who are you to tell him that's an unhappy way to live his life? Hell, he could even have a relationship with an older late 20s or early 30s woman, and keep the harem as side pieces even. A successful man holds all the cards. He can literally do whatever he wants, and there will always be a woman, somewhere, who will want him even if she has to share him with younger side p…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 03:13 AM
9

Studies show that men who put in the work peak in their late 40s to early 50s. That is the time period where their resources will be immense due to their strong work ethic, and their appearance will not yet be degraded via aging so long as they keep in shape. The highest value man to a woman is a late 40s in shape man with tons of resources and prestige. That is why this man can attain a harem of 20 year old fuck-things at his disposal 24/7, and why women his own age are constantly complaining a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 03:02 AM
2

https://myanimelist.net/anime/41946/Shuumatsu\_no\_Harem
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 02:22 AM
6

there has been no time in history where dating has been good for an average male. it has always been good for top males and females that exist within their harems or monogamous with a 60-70% male, but never for men average or below. So I don't care, perhaps I choose the prehistorical world in the hopes that I get some punani before I die at the age of 14.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 02:18 AM
3

Following the misandry perpetuated by our gynocentric society, nice guys are universally condemned and told that they must change or face consequences for their actions, whether that be getting fired from work, doxxed online, or told to kill themselves. Nice girls, on the other hand, are given a universal benefit of the doubt, and most people believe a man made the girl into a "nice girl" and she must be helped to become a strong independent feminist woman instead. She will be given upward mobil…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 09:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter