TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Reno0vacio Archive

View 18 posts and 351 comments by Reno0vacio on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
171

Red Pill TheoryReno0vacio/r/TheRedPill19/10/24 01:00 PM
74

DebateReno0vacio/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 06:47 AM
56

DebateReno0vacio/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 05:57 AM
55

ConversationReno0vacio/r/seduction18/06/24 10:11 AM
31

ConversationReno0vacio/r/seduction05/01/25 07:56 AM
20

ConversationReno0vacio/r/seduction19/06/24 03:42 PM
11

Question For MenReno0vacio/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 07:35 AM
11

DebateReno0vacio/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 02:24 PM
7

ConversationReno0vacio/r/seduction22/07/24 06:01 PM
2

ConversationReno0vacio/r/seduction19/06/24 09:39 AM
2

Question For WomenReno0vacio/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 09:37 AM
1

ConversationReno0vacio/r/seduction28/07/24 05:51 AM
1

ConversationReno0vacio/r/seduction01/07/24 02:10 PM
1

ConversationReno0vacio/r/seduction28/12/24 05:32 AM
1

ConversationReno0vacio/r/seduction16/08/24 11:44 AM
0

DebateReno0vacio/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 04:51 AM
0

Fundamentals Reno0vacio/r/seduction31/07/24 05:07 PM
0

DebateReno0vacio/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 05:43 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Down voted. Frist when i read the title.. i realized that if people have two braincells and was out there in the real word, and know that what is in a strip club knows that the title is a bulshit.
/r/seduction16/06/26 05:57 AM
14

I think you can easily find not one video on how to do it properly. Its way better i think to watch a video, then read it how to do it.
/r/RedPillWomen03/04/26 06:58 AM
1

I hate these kinds of comments. They show a complete lack of critical thinking or knowledge about what women want. If I just read what you wrote, and obviously I don't know how good-looking or masculine the two men were... then I have to say that either the other men couldn't sell themselves or most women were superficial. Although the fact that yes, money - financial security - is important to women also plays a role. This is a complex issue, and without any context, your comment came across as…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:17 AM
1

I don't know, it could be argued but maybe yes, the clothes, the face, the grooming are all part of it, but it's also true I think that if there were a man and a woman on a desert island and only a sheet covering their intimate parts, then without all the make-up, clothes, nice hair, whatever, the man would still "want" the woman, whereas the other way round I don't think it would work the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 08:50 AM
1

Yes, there is effort involved, of course, but the point is that men "inheretly" value a woman's looks while women value a man's performance. This is important to get into the heads of many red pillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 08:06 AM
1

This. And understand this.. because some people are redpilled so they know a little about this but : woman value a man's performance.. a man values a woman's beauty. Obviously the amount of value each sex gives is different but that is the answer for 2-3 big bigot red pill claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 06:25 AM
1

I see a lot of people dont even know what "red pill" is, or what it's core purpose.
/r/ExRedPill17/11/25 12:23 PM
1

I'm just puting it here that the "philosophy" of redpill and what kind of people are in it and they say are different things.
/r/ExRedPill16/11/25 05:51 AM
–

I don't see.. where are the links to the research? If they are so scientific. And it's not necessarily that I'm "just saying" that you write like am incel. There is a basis in reality yes. But how much you talk/present in a way that covers the truth is another matter. The reason why what you write is incel is because it comes down to something like women are bad . And you can twist your comment all you want but that's what comes across. And that's why I hate this incel mentality/wording because …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 06:06 AM
–

Agen, this angry incel kind of way of thinking congrat.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 05:36 AM
1

You left out that men "subconsciously" size each other up, and that's why you get the many misunderstanding from comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 08:50 AM
2

Woman. Woman tell men that they want "nice guys" and not the other way around just to be clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 08:47 AM
1

I don’t understand why Bluddy-9 was downvoted, because much of what he said reflects reality. The truth is that men are expected to initiate. Men are expected to be "masculine" - to lead, to pursue, to escalate sexually, and to generally take control in relationships. That’s the default societal expectation. I’m not denying that women have also been misled from the start. They’ve been fed illusions too. However, if we seriously think about it, blaming men for acting poorly just because they were…
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/25 09:35 AM
1

By the way, it is not enough just to "link" research, you need to understand it and draw the right conclusions. From the three studies it can be concluded that "looks are important for women" but it cannot be concluded that they are "as important" for men. By the way, what kind of "research" is this? What is the relevance? The first is about "speed dating" The second is just an "abstraction" The third is about "online dating" (which is a joke to anyone who links to it, because obviously online l…
/r/seduction17/07/25 09:17 AM
1

But I'm talking about initial desire. What she sees as you cross the room towards her, before the first words even come out of your mouth. Or what she sees on your dating profile, if you're doing OLD. This is where you are not right. Usually a man has a "desire" for a woman just by looking at her. You don't need research for that, just real-life experience and common sense. If you were a man, you would know that for us, just seeing a good woman is "enough" to make us willing to sleep with you. S…
/r/seduction17/07/25 09:08 AM
0

EXACTLY the same amount as men This is the part that is not true. For men, it is more important to look the opposite sex good in general than it is for women. Obviously everyone cares about looks, but it's bullshit that it matters "as much" to women as it does to men. Of course, it doesn't matter what term we're talking about or what the goals of individuals are.
/r/seduction17/07/25 07:31 AM
1

I do not necessarily agree with everything. For example, how is it that a man should not be happy when a woman initiates or shows signs of liking a man because the woman will change her mind "anyway"? Pretty negative and non-realistical.
/r/seduction07/07/25 06:46 AM
2

Another angry insecure incel. Hurray!
/r/seduction07/07/25 06:29 AM
0

I don't think critical thinking necessarily works for you, because it's just that generalities are important in critical thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 06:08 AM
–

Just from the title: "you don't know what hypergamy means in general, and where it is used."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 11:27 AM
-17

Send a link
/r/seduction23/06/25 09:29 AM
2

Pathetic clickbait title. The woman should have been left there. If she can't understand the male world and always confuses it with something "toxic" then it wouldn't have ended well anyway. The lesson is to avoid women who take masculinity the wrong way. And of course it's true that it does matter what words you use. But a woman's reaction to masculinity is not a good sign.
/r/seduction20/06/25 05:41 AM
1

Thanks for the comment. Out of 200 comments, someone is positive and understands, for the most part. But I guess we are used to this situation :S
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 06:17 PM
2

Blue pill is the mainstream narratives mostly. Blue Pill people is who believe in those , and "stay in the Matrix". For example the famous "just be yourself", "looks don't matter, it's what's inside that counts", "if you stop looking love will eventually find you", and the like. (In dating) In short, idealistic feel good advice is a mentality that may make you feel good for an hour or a day but is actually useless or even harmful to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 03:29 AM
1

Its about understanding not controlling.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 12:52 PM
1

Red PIll is not a group of people who hate woman. Red PIll is an ideology. Dont confuse the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 06:25 AM
2

Yes, unfortunately there are people who have made it a dogma. But what I am saying is that Red Pill is not just a group. The Red Pill is a framework, a mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 03:33 AM
2

I think there's something in what he says, especially in the first one. Women usually leave a relationship when there is already another potential man. What I don't like about this is the language and the fact that the person wrote 90%, because even though this "monkey-branching" may be true for many women, it's still a trend and it doesn't mean that all women do it. But again... it's one man's post. One man is not going to determine Red PIll views. The truth is that the Red Pill is very useful …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 10:29 AM
2

Painting "most" women to be like none How did you mean this exactly? I have not really heard this "typical" statement. My first language is not necessarily English, can you describe briefly what you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 09:55 AM
2

What some Red Pillers say doesn't denote what Red Pill is Yeah. Out of 100 people might one get it. 🙌
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 05:07 AM
1

Bulshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 04:09 AM
1

I think you are confusing things. First of all, just because you want to be attractive for a lot of women doesn't mean you want to please them. It's just common sense and strategy that you have qualities that "most" women want. Secondly, it's about the longer version of "be yourself". I'll give you the short version. It's not necessarily a good thing to tell people to be themselves if being themselves is not attractive to women in general. You're just saying to the man: "hey, you're okay the way…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 04:06 AM
2

I think your comment and well written. What I see is that even if I were just a simple man seeking the truth and wanting to help other men, but that requires me to tell them, say, less pleasant truths, then even if "I" don't use the red or blue pill, others will put it on me. I know very well that the world and people are complex, I try very hard to understand things and a lot of things are connected. But I don't know how much you know, but I don't think there are really many people like me or y…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 06:15 PM
0

I don't really think that the original ideology "or the way I like it" has any drawbacks. As I described it, RedPill is supposed to be a kind of "science" which should not necessarily consist of research but of very strong and logical theories. But of course research can also be used. The point of what I described is that "if you want to find the right answers" then you actually have to do as the scientists do. You have to have theories and do a lot of research and come up with a strong theory. …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 04:47 PM
1

I see it in the comments here too.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 03:44 PM
0

Argruing lvl 200
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 03:43 PM
0

Can you read? Its kind of in the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 02:46 PM
2

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 02:31 PM
3

What proof do you need? Its in the name "you have to belive" that the system even exist. And on the other hand its not for you. Those man undersatand that have been trough some bad experiences because of the blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 02:31 PM
2

Verry open and inteligent. 🙌
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 01:15 PM
2

The first one is Black PIll.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 01:10 PM
-1

People in Red Pill.. not Red PIll itself.. Red Pill is an ideology.......
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 01:09 PM
3

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 01:06 PM
4

I cannot explain it any more clearly. The Red Pill is an ideology, a mentality. Just because they are idiots who don't understand statistics and take things out of context doesn't make ideology wrong. They are wrong. Online dating is about that the apps designe allow to people to live out their nature. And yes. Probably it means that woman a choosyer and want the best man if she can because she can.. she have way way more options then a man, and why not want the best? Of course there are more th…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 01:05 PM
0

Yes, but that's not necessarily what the red pill is about. It's more about people who have already lived through the contradictions that the world has told them. You can't prove everything because there's no research and even if there is, it's not necessarily strong. The red pill is about telling you why you really experienced what you experienced and what you did wrong. If you accept it, if you think about it, then great, maybe it helps, if not, then no.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 08:58 AM
0

Great comment. Yeah that claim is mostly unbetable. But most of redpill talks about, in order you to accept it or consider accepting it, you first need to be a real blue piller and feel the contradictions of social narratives.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 08:44 AM
0

Yes, I think we are there. I've been on the blue pill like many people. The reality is that a lot of times you can't be a red piller if you weren't a blue piller. But you see, you say this is all "nonsense" but I'm well aware that these people haven't figured out that mentality doesn't work and I don't judge them because of it. And as I mentioned. It takes critical thinking to realize that the solution is mostly in the middle, not in the extremes
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 08:24 AM
1

Works in "most times" 🫠 i just wrote that. Red Pill not deontology, its not about morality.. 🫠 reading.. why i'm writing even if you dont read? (Understand) This is why I'm not bluepilled or redpilled, the true reality is too complex and nuanced to be summed up in a pill. Wow no kidding... I know very well that it's complex. But while the Blue pill people - the average people - say what you say. "everything is complicated" and they do nothing to understand it, the red pill "theory" is a way for …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 08:03 AM
4

Probably yes. The problem is that there's often not a lot of research or statistics on topics like dating. And I'm not saying that there aren't, I'm just saying that there aren't enough to establish strong enough trends. So we rely on logic, evolution and other studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 07:47 AM
0

Do you people read anyway? What would the Red Pill be? Are you asking for "my" opinion, or is it just the way I wrote it... you expect an explanation and you totally don't care because then you expect it again and again and again and you never get enough. Red pill is about understanding reality, about seeing the world as it is, not as many people "want it to be". The purpose of red pill is to try to get as close as possible to objective general useful probalistic reality/truth. The move is just …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 07:40 AM
–

I don’t have the time or energy to debate whether red pill is “bad” or “misogynistic.” That’s not what this post is about. I’m talking about the red pill as it was meant to be - used by people who actually want to understand human behavior, question false narratives, and help others avoid avoidable mistakes. If your response is just “But Andrew Tate said...” or “Fresh and Fit are toxic,”.... That’s not the red pill I’m talking about. I’m not defending every person who uses the label. I’m explain…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 05:59 AM
1

Nope. The Red PIll like ideology is not about r/TheRedPIll. Because they are just soo soo far away how real redpill shoud be.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 04:11 AM
1

Unfortunately. What you can do is tell people the "right" mentality or advice, not the wrong one, and explain to them why what you say is true. But as you get into the third conversation and you feel that they are just accusing you of what you say, it's pointless to continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 04:09 AM
1

Also - anyone who disagrees with it is blind, weak and stupid. Now these are the people to avoid. But on the other hand, if you're being told this by someone who is Red Pilled, and has shown you more than one source that what he says is quite possible, and you still reject it and don't believe a word he says, then I can agree somewhat with Red Pilles. But obviously, Red Pill is really about the truth... a lot of people don't want to know. The Red Pill doesn't tell you to accept this or accept th…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 04:06 AM
2

You take one example from a much bigger picture 🙌. On the other hand, you don't really feel the weight of how important it is for men to know this. Thirdly, it's obviously not about these two sentences.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 03:59 AM
2

Can you tell me examples?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 03:56 AM
1

RP is whatever its followers say it is It looks like woke to me. Just because certain members of a group do certain things or believe what the group is about. That doesn't change the original definition of the group.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 03:55 AM
1

Oh, asking questions about claims and understanding a concept correctly is equal to being a cult leader? XD Could you also show me where i talk about my "super secret" cult being impossible to understand :D
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 07:05 PM
1

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 07:02 PM
1

For example?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 07:02 PM
1

there any RP theories in particular that u can think of which u feel are more dubious than accurate? I don't know all the Red Pill theories and so I find it hard to remember things off the top of my head, it's much easier when I see one and then I can analyse it one by two with my current knowledge :D. I think the problem is - as far as I can see it - that few people understand or see through the whole "dating" thing. So I've read PUA as much as I have, I've been Blue-pill and Red Pill and there…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 06:57 PM
1

To follow into my other point—since im realizing I worded that a bit too long and confusingly—why do you think more men than not use RP as an outlet for hatred, which gets the most attention? If RP is about 'clarity' and reflecting 'reality', then why do you think a considerable amount of guys use RP as a way to hate women and stifle their personal growth and dating prospectd due to percieved flaws? Like why do u think some RP men make RP their whole personalities but then make a dogma of TRP, r…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 06:57 PM
1

Since its supposedly a science, could you explain which RP theories you think are most accurate to reality? Like for starters, what contexts could 'looksmaxxing' and 'solipsism' reveal the most truth about people's behaviors and preferences in your opinion. Again its fine if u dont want to. :-) It's interesting that you are interested in this topic because most of the "material" or writing is for men on how to get women. Of course there are female versions and female red pill ones but I don't ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 06:56 PM
1

Who hurt you? And what is your problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 06:09 PM
1

That's not really what it's about, but it's often quite tiring. And it's not about everyone being a critic 24 hours a day, it's about certain cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 05:11 PM
1

Well yes Black/Blue was somewhat correct but Red was was off. Red is telling you that you need to listen what she says and what she dose too. But obviusly this is my view.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 05:10 PM
1

ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 05:07 PM
1

I dont agree w much of any of it but I always strive to understand why people believe what they do and where theyre coming from. Well, that's pretty rare to see here :) To be more specific, what aspects of TRP ideology or tenets do you feel are most reflective of womens and mens behaviors? Like, do you think there is any merit to concepts like 'looksmaxxing' or 'SMV' or 'solipsism' or something else? I think there are useful concepts such as SMV and looksmaxxing are not bad but obviously they ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 05:06 PM
2

Yes. A lot of people don't understand what we're talking about because a lot of times it's not necessarily beautiful or the highlight of human nature. There are many things people need to understand to accept the Red Pill and some people just don't want to know the truth because it means that they find out that they do have the opportunity to change their lives, but it comes with responsibility and it's not always pleasant.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 04:36 PM
1

Yes.. I am aware of this, and that is exactly why I wrote the post so that those who have only seen the "bad" side of the Red Pill would be aware that what they have seen is not the full and true picture. Regardless of the fact that many people associate it with the wrong things, no matter how many years from now the question will be asked, if one is curious about the "original" or true definition, one will find that it is closer to finding the truth than to finding that all women are only inter…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 04:25 PM
1

The term "AWALT" - All Women Are Like That - is not a generalization; it is an absolute statement. By definition, it excludes nuance and variation, treating all women as identical in behavior or motivation. This absolute framing is logically flawed and unhelpful for accurate analysis. Red Pill ideology, properly understood, does not require endorsing AWALT as a core tenet. The core is about recognizing patterns and tendencies across populations - not asserting that every individual fits the same…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 04:19 PM
1

Maybe you don't know because you haven't seen mate selection resources. And many people, even if they hear them, may not need them because they live their lives differently. But I think it's unnecessary to explain that. Most people who comment or disagree in this thread don't want to understand the Red Pill no matter how much reason you give.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 04:06 PM
1

Yes, I am selectively writing down what the Red Pill originally meant. And the fact that there are people who are very different from the original mentality doesn't change the essence of the original mentality. The fact that feminism is about equality and women's rights, and the fact that many feminists today would rather have power and special treatment, still means that "feminism" as a concept is the same... I don't know if you understand... The fact that there are people who use a certain ide…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 03:59 PM
1

Your questions are interesting and show you’re thinking deeply about this. I’m researching broadly because I’m writing a book on dating, so I need diverse sources to understand how things actually work and why. As a “true” Red Piller, if you will, I’m focused on uncovering real patterns, not just repeating dogma. I consume content from many places - YouTube channels, r/TheRedPill and other subreddits, books, articles, and research papers. I can share some solid YouTubers if you want. My approach…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 03:54 PM
0

This is the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 03:39 PM
0

You don’t grasp the core point. My post explicitly considers extremist, misogynistic Red Pill factions, if you read it carefully. My definition is aimed at practical realities for most men, not ideological extremes. The fact you miss this suggests you haven’t engaged deeply enough with what I wrote. Red Pill, as I present it, is about critical thinking and understanding patterns, not ideology or black/white dogma. If you reduce it to manipulation or cherry-picking science, you misunderstand or d…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 03:33 PM
1

Clear thinking means just that.. clear thinking. It’s not a dictionary definition, but a practical approach to seeing patterns and realities without unnecessary distortion. What I wrote about Red Pill is grounded in that practical framework: waking up to how things actually work in dating and human behavior, using critical thinking, probabilities, and tendencies. When you start questioning what “good” or “reality” means in absolute terms, or how different people see “clear thinking,” the discuss…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 03:27 PM
2

Your comment is off-topic. You raise objections about “evidence” when I explicitly cited the definition of pseudoskepticism, which involves rejecting evidence by default. Address your misunderstanding instead of diverting the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 02:22 PM
3

How do you mean that it “could mean anything”? For example, how could the phrase “clear thinking” or “good” have any other meaning? Yes, everyone has biases, but I don’t understand your main point or how it connects to what I wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 02:18 PM
1

"Ecstasy Pill Man" i see
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 02:07 PM
4

Unfortunately, you have a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 02:06 PM
1

The way you're framing it makes it sound like the worst parts of the internet are the whole picture. Yeah, there are loud reactionary voices in TRP spaces, and some people misuse evo psych or get stuck in ideology. But that’s not the core of what the Red Pill framework is meant to be. At its root, it’s about noticing patterns in male-female behavior that don’t line up with what mainstream culture often teaches - especially around dating, relationships, and sexual dynamics. It draws from evolutio…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 02:06 PM
1

You literally copied a well known universal indicator of a cult by pretending it’s a super secret cabal of informed men who are too deep to understand. Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 02:03 PM
5

You’re assuming it’s just naivety or gullibility on the part of men. That’s surface-level. The deeper issue is that most men are raised in a socially engineered narrative designed to keep them compliant, useful, and blind to their own disposability. Men are taught lies like: Be nice, be patient, be supportive - and eventually you’ll “earn” a woman’s love. Women want emotional vulnerability - but showing it gets you labeled weak or unattractive. Marriage and commitment are signs of maturity - but…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 02:00 PM
1

You're responding to the worst version of Red Pill, the loudest, shallowest personalities who’ve hijacked the label - not what I actually described. What I wrote was about understanding mating behavior through patterns shaped by evolution and culture, not blindly following talking heads or turning frustration into dogma. Of course there are grifters and bad actors who push pseudoscience. I’m not defending them. I’m talking about the core idea: using general tendencies and observable patterns to …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 01:52 PM
5

I think you misunderstood what I was saying. I never claimed Red Pill is some kind of secret society or hidden knowledge. What I was talking about is the difference between the original meaning of the Red Pill as a mentality - a way of looking at social and mating dynamics critically - and how a lot of people now misuse the label. I’m not claiming insider info or trying to sound special. I’m pointing out that there's a gap between the framework itself and how it gets distorted online. That was t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 01:49 PM
3

I get what you're trying to say, but your example doesn't really show that generalizations are wrong. It just shows that sometimes people misinterpret what they're seeing, especially if they bring in bias. That’s not the same thing as saying generalizing itself is the problem. Of course generalizations can be wrong. The point is to figure out which ones are actually useful and based on something real. That’s kind of the whole point of the Red Pill approach as I see it.. filtering out the weak or…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 11:55 AM
6

I understood what you were saying, which is why I wrote that it did... social things between people are often complex, and I agreed with that. But what I think you didn't understand from my previous comment or I didn't explain. That the Red Pill is trying to get as close to the "objective" truth as possible. It's not about analyzing a very specific 24-year-old woman with brown hair and two dogs and figuring out exactly what she might like in a man, it's about what most women on average might be …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:35 AM
1

Ok. How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:25 AM
0

Pseudoskepticism: The correct, though less common, use of the term "pseudoskepticism" refers to those who declare themselves merely "skeptical" of a concept, but in reality would not be convinced by any evidence. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Pseudoskepticism
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:02 AM
6

The Red Pill is not necessarily a movement, but rather a mentality or a framework. As I told a nice commenter, I didn't want to write a 250 page book on what the Red Pill is, I just wanted to illustrate with a few examples what it takes to be a so-called "good" Red Pill who really wants to find out the truth, from my point of view and to the best of my knowledge . Social interpretation is really tricky and everyone watches through some lens of their beliefs, which doesn’t make anything true. Yes…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:53 AM
5

Your comment misses the core of my post. You confuse emotional reactions with understanding nature and mix social justice history with evolutionary dynamics. The red pill isn’t about rejecting women’s feelings but about seeing reality clearly, without illusions. It’s a tool for analysis, not hatred or reduction. Your argument lacks focus and misses that point entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:33 AM
-1

Yes, if you don’t really know what red pill means, you’ll see random cases and think it’s wrong. Red pill explains general patterns in attraction based on biology and status. Ugly guys with hot women or broke guys with attractive women happen, but those are exceptions caused by specific factors. Seeing those doesn’t break the overall rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:13 AM
1

This post isn’t a 250-page manual on what Red Pill is. If you missed the point, focus on the core message instead of demanding exhaustive detail.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:09 AM
-1

You’re focusing on dissecting individual phrases instead of addressing the core argument. That approach sidesteps the actual points being made and stalls meaningful discussion. If you disagree, engage with the central claims rather than parsing wording out of context.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:03 AM
1

Yes, unfortunately... And that's why the name has a bad rep.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 08:22 AM
1

They are not the same thing. Everybody can learn new views that's true, but I don't think you've fully understood or seen the whole Matrix or the scene itself because it's exactly about the Matrix, which is not real, which is fake, where people live in lies, and the Red Pill is what opens their eyes.. Yes an average teenage boy can discover that not everything is nice... yes... But the Red Pill is not about simply accepting new views, it's about discovering what's real, how things really work, n…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 08:20 AM
5

To be honest I have been in the r/TheRedPill group quite a lot and while there is some very good content (rarely), the people who run the group and many others lack the ability to think for themselves. I personally have been banned from there, and in short when I spoke to the admi and described in almost an A4 page why I thought they had acted unlawfully and that I had not broken the rule, I was told "You should have accepted that you had made a mistake, that's all". Also, they looked at my prof…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 08:06 AM
1

That’s what you get when a movement is named so badly. And the fact that the movement is named so badly is good evidence that the movement is seriously flawed. I don't think you know where the name "Red Pill" itself comes from. And what does a name that can be confused with almost nothing have to do with how flawed the "movement" is ? No, it’s more like switching one set of falsehoods for another. And those falsehoods are misandrist and misogynistic, more obviously the latter usually I don't thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 07:51 AM
1

I don't think I fully understand what you're saying. What behaviours do you mean, and what do you mean, what to deny and what to accept?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 07:46 AM
3

I agree on that woman "think" they know what they want but not what they are actually attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 06:55 PM
5

So yes, each individual will be able to determine if they've found their best. I think you didn't read what I wrote or you didn't answer what I wrote, because I wrote half an hour ago that many people probably don't know what's "best" for them because they don't know themselves well enough. Unlike you, I see you know what kind of guy you "want", but many men, for example, don't "know" it "consciously" and I suspect many women don't either. No wonder some men struggle. They don't seem to want a p…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 06:19 PM
7

If you don't know what "the best" means, then you can't achieve it, and even if you want to, you won't know when you get it. Of course, we can never know for sure that you found "the best". For example, someone might just want a woman who knows how to cook, is feminine, and loves children. Would that be the best? Not necessarily... It's like when you want an ice cream. Is vanilla good? Yes. But if I had known there was salted caramel and I had tasted it once, I would know that's what I really wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 03:54 PM
8

It depends on what you mean by "best". And people how willing to get that best.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 03:27 PM
21

Easy... That's not what the red pill is about. It's just that it is supported and accepted. It's woman's nature to want the best guy she can get. Maybe you mean the black pill..
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 10:06 AM
0

This is the way..
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 09:10 AM
1

There are more category's to attractivnes..
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 07:26 AM
6

I don't think you really know the difference between things. In writing you have time to think, in writing you have to use emoji properly. Since it's only a 2d thing it does matter what you write. So it's not really the same. You can flirt in writing in the same way.. but again, the two are not quite the same. Again.. it's about writing, not online dating man. You're still texting a woman when you're talking about dating on the cold approach.
/r/seduction26/05/25 01:47 PM
9

The problem is that you think about texting "game" as gimmicks..
/r/seduction26/05/25 11:12 AM
–

And? What was the point of this post? The 233rd such post which is about the same thing... women are bad, everything is bad. And what's the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 08:05 AM
1

You are the exception, congratulations.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 03:32 AM
2

OP Post: if woman likes you she will go to your home and s.ck your dick because your are existing..
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 04:33 PM
1

The problem with the Red Pill is not that it relies on evolutionary foundations, but that many people who are Red Pill think that's all there is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 07:20 AM
1

An attractive high status man with money will always beat the guy with game. ALWAYS. Yes.. if you want a superficial woman, then yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 07:13 AM
1

You can define PUA as you wish for yourself, but just because someone is "picking up women" doesn't make them PUA. By the same token, anyone would be anyone who goes to a party or picks up women with their friends. They don't profess to be PUA specifically, and I think they know about the "old" kind of questionable methods, just like everyone else. That you were just "playing" the man. I'm not saying there are no good advisors, just that when someone thinks of PUA they think of "playing/acting" …
/r/seduction07/05/25 05:29 AM
1

Yes I know Coach Kyle, and Denmo but they are not part of the PUA, or as far as I know they do not consider themselves to be.
/r/seduction06/05/25 07:30 AM
1

This is the last time I'll answer you because there's no point in answering any more. (I mean you haven't even had the chance to give me a formulation of what PUA is to you or explain it to my poor humble self) Why shoud i car if i meet someone from the PUA community? Really? Should I take someone at their word because I know them personally? Should I trust his knowledge because... he's cool ? I suppose you trust him because... yes I think that's how you have to look at something intelligently a…
/r/seduction05/05/25 10:48 AM
2

I haven't heard your version of what the PUA mentality or "movement" is. From his book "The Natural": An example of direct game is to approach a girl, tell her you think she’s beautiful, then take her by the hands and quickly go for the kiss. As I said... they knew all the things, the problem is that they were repeating things they had heard from others, or what they knew, they didn't "understand" enough. What kind of thing is it to just go up to a woman take her hand and kiss her? I note that t…
/r/seduction05/05/25 08:26 AM
1

I don't think you know what PUA means... it's like a 90s music. Do you listen to it now? Yes... but the music itself is from the 90s.. Just because it's 2025 doesn't mean PUA, the mentalities/teachings are different, and everyone thinks of the old PUA, not some 2025 version. But if I'm wrong, tell me where is the current PUA and who teaches it or where are the new resources?
/r/seduction05/05/25 05:42 AM
13

The problem with PUA that it's about "seeming" like a sucessful man with woman instead of actually becoming one.
/r/seduction05/05/25 12:00 AM
1

You don't know what you're talking about. What examples have you given? Cultural ones? Where? What are you even talking about. Y I'm talking about the fact that I say from evolution and biology that yes, a man's "BEHAVIOR" is more attractive to women than vice versa, and that yes, women can be attracted to a man by the way he behaves towards her.. attraction: for man and woman man: looks > personality woman: character > looks (In short, in case you don't understand... It's not that a woman doesn…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/25 11:48 AM
1

Typical... as I said, you bring up the problems of the West. Which is fine, I don't deny that the problems there exist. But there is not only "AMERICA" in the world. I was talking about the "nature" of women, not why in America there are many divorce, which could be explained in more than one way. The difference between what I'm talking about and what you're talking about is that I'm talking about how "in general" all women behave and you're talking about how women in America are behaving these …
/r/TheRedPill30/04/25 05:28 AM
1

Look at how the desires and the nature of man and woman evolved, what they want evolutionarily or biologically. If you'd done a little reading you'd have realised that the "normal" woman is more interested in the man being able to give her what she wants. What does she want? Security... Whether it's financial, emotional, or physical. I mean, I'm not just saying something like you... look it up. The woman was interested a few million years ago (and still is) in sharing the man resources, wealth (…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/25 06:42 PM
1

GAME does not make a woman attracted to you That's what you said. So no matter what you do, no matter how you use GAME, you can't make a woman feel attracted to you. You're saying that, aren't you? Of over 100 likes and multiple replies....Most in the sub are in agreement with my post. and have been in agreement with me previous posts. Honestly who the f. cares how much clever stuff you've said in your previous posts? Who the f. cares what other people say? Why are you covering for them? I find …
/r/TheRedPill29/04/25 06:42 PM
1

I clearly defind game as how you "deal" with women who are already physically attracted to you. Deal: (verb) meaning- how you take action with regard to somone or something. It wasn't about "DEAL" it was about "GAME"... which you didn't articulate. Or do you think "DEAL" says a lot? On the other hand "GAME" can be mental or physical. It can include the mentality you have towards women and dating, or towards yourself, or it can include your "attitude" about how you treat women, whether it's your …
/r/TheRedPill29/04/25 04:16 PM
1

GAME does not make a woman attracted to you. Game is how you deal with a woman that is already naturally physically attracted to you. I would disagree with that, if only because you use "GAME" which you don't define what it means to you exactly and therefore is extremely broad.. Secondly, GAME includes your behaviour, the way you treat the woman you are, the way you behave. You can't be physically attractive, you can't be attractive to anyone because you have "one" appearance, I think that's obv…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/25 09:07 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YZIytu8JyDg
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 02:24 PM
2

Do you think everyone is like you? You can't understand that not everyone gets to where you are. You're there now, great. Instead of telling people why they are suck, maybe you could help show them what you discovered. That's what the Red Pill is all about. But very few people get to that stage when they are really only interested in human nature and reality. When they're really thinking about it and trying to give you advice that's really useful. A lot of times men just realize that they've bee…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:28 PM
2

Again... you think that because you've figured something out that everyone should know it, child or adult, it doesn't matter. Because you think it's simple and obvious everyone should know. Right? The earth turns, around the sun, doesn't it? Yes, it's true that all of humanity thought the opposite, but everyone should know that it doesn't, right? Just because everybody was as smart as one man...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 11:04 AM
2

Yeah, that's the kind of person you are. You think that because you've now "figured out" the big things in life and everything is simple and logical, that anyone who doesn't understand or know is a stupid moron. Despite the fact that you were the same kind of idiot before you didn't know. I'll give you a hint, tell me what you've figured out and why what you've figured out is true instead of telling off those who haven't figured it out that they are stupid and don't have observational skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 08:49 AM
1

Not just Disney... parents, friends, women, movies, commercials. There's not just one responsible.. But the point is to wake up and look for answers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 08:22 AM
1

So what is the point of this post? Other than to tell you to admit you were a dumb*ss?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 08:18 AM
1

I don't really understand your argument because you say that anyone who wants something from a person just for their "looks" is uppity, when I said absolutely nothing of the sort. I said that "the app design" makes people make a decision based on a picture, because after a while you get used to it because you realize that people don't write anything meaningful about themselves. And I'll say it again... People don't get superficial "most of the time" but are forced to use the app the way they do,…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:51 AM
–

You better take that "Red Pill" label off your profile because you have nothing to do with the mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:34 AM
–

I think people like you should be kept in check. You probably have these degenerate ideas about not helping your male counterparts because you're below the frog's butt, and even one extra competency is a huge disadvantage to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:24 AM
1

I don't think you know how a dating app works, or even if you've used one, because you wouldn't be making a claim like that. It's not a problem if you don't write anything about yourself, or if you don't read other people's stuff and you're just swiping on people, but it's superficial if you're just trying to meet them for their looks... where's the logic in that?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 11:44 AM
1

I think it's not the same, and I didn't just use the goat example. It's the apps that bring out the superficiality in people. For example, anyone who lives in the real world knows that looks is the first thing you notice about people, and it's the first thing you use to decide whether or not something should happen between you and them. Well. You could say that people are superfecial because they judge people by their appearance. Which is true, though, just because they act according to their na…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 08:25 AM
1

Just because I watch goat porn doesn't mean I'll have sex with a goat. It's very simple... just because I'm upset online, just because I might not be as calm and more vocal online doesn't make me a screaming animal in real life. People adapt their behaviour to the situation. Just because online people become "superfecial" because of the way apps are designed doesn't mean they are in real life. Of course, apps can have an effect on people's views in the long run.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 07:37 AM
1

The friend zone exists before we forget because you misspeak. So I don't understand why you say it doesn't exist. The red pill now that's a real thing. The blue pill and many inexperienced men won't admit it doesn't exist, or that they're in it. I know that wasn't the point of the post, after all.. but I don't like it when people try to pass something off or make a claim in such a sneaky way.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 06:59 AM
1

Gaslight into what?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:48 PM
1

I often come across this "have an exciting life" kind of advice. But what if I don't want an exciting life? I understand that it's for my sake, but it's also a good thing because it's tempting for a woman. But like a lot of people online I think we're introverts and we don't want to be the centre of attention and talk and party 0/24. You can still go on trips and be successful of course. I just think that when someone says "have an exciting life" they don't mean the quiet kind. Maybe I'd say don…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/25 05:16 AM
0

Niceness != simp/dormat/nice guy
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 05:26 AM
1

Balck pill on.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 05:23 AM
2

Okay budy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 04:03 AM
-1

What are you talking about? Aren't you in the circus?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 08:37 AM
1

I agree that there may be more women in the US who claim this. And I don't deny that many have their reasons. The real reason. Harassment, bad experiences, etc.. What concerns me, and I think you agree with me "to some degree" is that instead of these women saying: "I had a bad experience because of this and this" (so men should do this and this better) Instead they say that "all men" should not approach "all women" . You get the problem. Your private life is nobody's business, and especially do…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 04:24 AM
1

Why are we arguing about the debate? It's really not atomic physics that nothing is black and white. I can't explain my intentions any better than that. Nothing is black and white, and I've observed that many men see it that way... that because they've seen something on the internet, they immediately think it's reality, that what a few women say is representative of all women. That because they've had bad experiences with women, that all women are bad. But I beg you, not all western women have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 07:37 PM
0

I see you can't read either, or you don't understand. I'm not saying that there aren't idiots in the West who call the police on each other because "there's a law"... I know there are. But if you'd listened for a minute you'd understand that I'm talking about a lot of men without going out in the world and experiencing it for themselves, just parroting what they see on the internet with no, I repeat... no real experience or very little. And because one sheep follows the others, the more sheep th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 05:05 PM
2

The internet is not a representative source to describe an entire gender based on a few cases. This is good enough?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 04:59 PM
0

Most of what you've said has been debunked elsewhere on this thread. Sure.. But why do you care if most (50%+1?) are giving up Because you know there are people who want to help their fellow man.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 02:18 PM
-4

Down vote me all you want, but I would have been genuinely curious about your interactions and what the woman looks like... I somehow have not managed to catch the crazy women so far... Maybe you need to develop your people skills and social skills. Body language, tone, and maybe a little research into what kind of woman to avoid.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 02:16 PM
-1

I don't know why you accuse me of something I didn't do or didn't mention. I merely pointed out (you may not have seen it) that men should not believe everything on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 02:13 PM
1

I would disagree with that slightly... it may be that younger people who grow up into it are more likely to believe it. But so does someone who knows nothing about how social media works, or how to use their brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 02:11 PM
1

The problem is not that online women hate men. It is that irl women say equally hateful things at worst or nothing at best I can only conclude what I have already written. And then the whole female race is bad because there are some not quite normal women who react the way they do? Do you think there are no women in the world or in your country who could not react the way you have experienced?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 02:08 PM
0

I can't imagine where in the world you live if all women are like that (I doubt it). But I wonder if you've actually experienced it or if you're just like the rest of them. I don't know if you know, but the behaviour of these women is not "normal". And what I don't understand about these people who bring up examples like this is... don't they know it's not normal? I mean... not normal behavior = not normal woman. I think it takes simple logic and common sense to make a man think that this kind o…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 02:05 PM
1

Well like i said online is the real world Ok..
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 02:00 PM
1

I agree with you. No matter what anyone says, it was true before and it is true now.. But I love anyone who's for not approaching woman, I really do. Because I'm sure more people will go to nightclubs (half the world is introverted) or there's the next best thing, the dating apps... Super, that's really super idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 01:54 PM
-3

So now the question is whether female-dominated subreddits are representative of women in real life. No. I don't think you know what the r/AskWoman group is about at all.. Have you ever tried to post something there in your life? Do you even know how many rules you have to follow, from post title to description? It's horrible.. Not to mention that if they don't like what you post they delete it instantly.. So much for the credibility of the group itself.. On the other hand, in case you didn't kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 01:50 PM
-2

If you are attractive enough for approaches you will do good enough on apps too. I'm not really sure why you brought up the looks between dating apps and cold approaching. Of course they are related, but I think they are heaven and earth. For dating, all you need is to look normal, look reasonably good, and be confident... And online, what do you need? To look good, preferably really good, and then maybe I'll meet you. I don't think the two are the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 01:40 PM
-2

Guru? No. Enlightened? Probably.. You need to understand that "critical thinking" can lead to conclusions other than the ones you've arrived at. And with that definition, how much do you think the people I'm talking about are using it? Apart from coming to the conclusion (rather, they are just following their emotions). That "because someone said it and said it many times it is probably true".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 01:27 PM
1

Like who? And how did you know that?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 10:58 AM
1

Women need to be choosier than men. They are already..
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 08:21 AM
-5

Well, yes, I can understand that. Luckily where I live there are not the crazy idiots I hear in the west. Because they are... If you would have gone up to her in a normally "situational" respectful confident manner and asked her if she were in the mood to meet, they would have respectfully said no or yes and that would have been that. The person who calls the police on you if things didn't happen the way I described has a problem with that person.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 08:13 AM
0

I myself rather have the female make the first move. Good luck with it. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 08:09 AM
-5

Their critical thinking skills are working just right and their issues have nothing to do with tiktok or algorithms or whatever. I don't think you have a good understanding of what critical thinking is... and I see you didn't see the link I attached either, because then you wouldn't be saying such things.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 08:07 AM
1

It point does not change. Go out in the real world, talk to "normal" women, not fancy, luxurious babes, and do it respectfully and normally. Accept when they say no (which is most of the time) and move on to the next woman. Then when you've had 20 or 30 women, you'll have an opinion on what's real.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 08:05 AM
3

I was about to write something similar. I think the real Red pill advice is motivating and "explains" why it works. Because the Red Pill is about human nature, especially female nature. I think the advice should be practical and backed up with good examples and describe the actual context etc etc.. I think this writing was too motivational and wanted to tell you how super of a guy you are, how super of a life you have etc etc.. But I don't have a super life. And I think a lot of people don't. A …
/r/TheRedPill09/04/25 09:24 AM
1

The reason fst chicks are more likely to get into a relationship than a fat guy is exactly because your average guy is more likely to be willing to date an overweight chick or find an overweight chick attractive. I didn't understand exactly "why" a fat guy would be more willing to sleep with a fat woman instead. They could care just as much if not more but also want other things too, which is what I believe to be the case. So you're implying that women don't have enough of anything because they …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 04:12 PM
1

What does the amount of sex and relationships that women (fat women) get or are able to get have to do with the fact that men are very concerned about looks? One is about options for the female gender, the other is about male preferences.☠️
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 06:15 AM
3

Look at that, someone who told the truth and the downvotes are comming, just the usual 😁
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 06:07 AM
11

Or just learn to say no and find a normal woman. You don't have to cry about how bad the world is, you have to do something about it. Until you find yourself a woman, build yourself up and make your own life better. So, if you don't know what it's like to be a man, I can give you some advice. Men usually do things and don't complain. I understand that you are in a bad situation, and many other men, but life has dealt you a hand and you have to deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 08:35 AM
1

The problem is that it is pointless to describe such specific examples, especially in a book article, because you cannot imagine the situation. Without describing with pinpoint accuracy when, with what woman, etc.. it works, it becomes as meaningless as if someone had told you to "just be yourself"
/r/TheRedPill01/04/25 04:13 AM
2

Finally, someone with whom we also realised that we had to find this balance ourselves. You're the first person who realized what it would be like to look at things objectively, not just through the lens of the blue pill or the red pill. I wish that's what the red pill was about and that's what people were like, because that's what it started out as. To learn about human/woman nature and be able to use it to our advantage (without looking down on women as much as we do now).
/r/TheRedPill01/04/25 04:09 AM
1

Like, yes.. there is no one perfect guide. But why do we have to assume that a guide should be step-by-step accurate? Because some people think that if there is a guide, it means that if you do x things to x women, then z things will happen... it's not a guide... a guide says "with a high probability that's what happens".
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 11:40 AM
1

These are things that come naturally to most men. At least in older men it's already developing, but it's not uncommon for it to develop when you're young. What happens is that you probably don't like the truth... there's a certain level of bizyness that you have to go through to be "attractive". You don't want to get to that level.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 04:17 AM
1

You are confident because you did things that you where afraid of.. and you belive that you can do it agen.. 🤯
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 06:33 AM
3

Everyone blames the apps, which is fair... but the reality is that app design and human nature are at play.. Everyone could write something interesting about themselves, but no one does. Why would you look at someone else's profile when 8 out of 10 times you don't post anything about yourself? So we'll end up like all the copy paste dating apps that mimic this stupid swipe. You see the profile and you don't scroll down, you decide on the person in 1 second. That's why the app is so superfecial (…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 10:57 AM
1

You can literally "see" the person in the picture who is half-naked... I mean.. 🫠
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 04:59 PM
1

I can't think what type of guys you mean as I don't really look at the opposite sex. It's kind of interesting though, because usually men are like "women like muscles". That's why a lot of guy post that kind of picture. On the other hand, a lot of men don't want anything long-term. So if those two statements are generally true, then "most guys are players". By the way, what exactly does "player" mean to you ?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:52 PM
1

So if he's showing his muscles, he probably doesn't want a long-term relationship? Or do you just get the idea that he wants to get everything with his muscles? What I know about women is that they might not want choose a guy in the dating app if the guy is posting these half-assed muscular pictures, but if they are already with the guy then it's very sexy because the guy is already "theirs".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:35 PM
1

Why are shirtless photos so bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:30 PM
2

What kind of red flags do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:29 PM
1

What do you mean by "hot"? That it's above average, or your type, or?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 09:42 AM
2

Sorry, I want to send it to op.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 03:01 PM
1

Again, someone who doesn't really understand how there are gloomy men with no life, and there are some who actually know what a red pill is, what it's about and what it's for. You've probably confused the latter with the earlier redpill with what everyone hears about how sadistic the animals there are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:04 PM
2

agree
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 07:44 PM
4

It can be. I still think my previous comment is equally relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 05:10 AM
8

Women like tall men because it means dominance. If you are taller, you are less likely to be bullied. Especially if it's not a stick man.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 05:06 AM
1

I didn't say a word about women being worthless at this time, that's what you say. RedPill doesn't have a good reputation because there are people who are putting the group down. Yes there are posts here written by a lot of resentful desperate men who don't have a good opinion of women. But if you keep an open mind a little and stay in the group longer you will find that not everyone is talking the kind of nonsense that makes the group dislike itself. Also the problem that is happening now is th…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/25 12:32 PM
1

Find who? A young woman? (Because we talked about that) Again, your interpretation of what stuck with you about the post. The post is just an explanation of a phrase that is often used meaninglessly and misused. What you can learn from it is that as a man you are more valuable to the world and women if you have more assets, more skills that are useful. While for women, it is that men value younger women more, and since youth is not eternal, it is better to tie down a valuable man when young. Of …
/r/TheRedPill27/02/25 11:44 AM
1

And? Not every woman are the same. What is your problem excatly?
/r/TheRedPill27/02/25 11:23 AM
1

And? Not every woman are the same. What is your problem excatly?
/r/TheRedPill27/02/25 11:22 AM
1

They can use it in a way that they know they have to get a great man at a young age, yes 😃
/r/TheRedPill27/02/25 10:32 AM
1

This is your interpretation. I don't know how you came up with that. It's just that women have to find a good man at a young age. They can later, but since men place a lot of importance on youth, it makes it somewhat harder later 🤔
/r/TheRedPill27/02/25 04:35 AM
1

Do they share their values? 😅 I think most women and men don't know what their own values are.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 05:22 AM
1

Incel stuff, yes. Def not redpill view.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 05:17 AM
2

Yes, this is usually the rarest case. Usually with women you need to build up "trust" with a few funny sayings, what you do and etc.. because if you want to meet straight away you are "pushing too hard". And as a man, when you have 1-2 dates a week, you're careful not to screw up those few matches by being too pushy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 05:13 AM
1

Yap, online. Most man like to forget that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:01 AM
-1

I don't know where you got that from. He said if you can talk on the phone well, you'll have a better chance of getting a date. Not that talking on the phone is better than dating 😅.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/25 09:05 AM
1

Great comment. Thanks.
/r/seduction06/01/25 05:00 PM
0

Bad advice..
/r/seduction05/01/25 09:29 AM
0

Why, why is his story so..?
/r/seduction05/01/25 09:27 AM
2

It was so fun during the process but the most horrible experience afterwards. I think it depends how you look at it. And I think a lot of women don't know how many mistakes, rejections, and failures a man has to go through to learn how to be "good" with a woman... The way I see it... when women want to want a guy who "knows" how to do things with a woman it's already a bad thing because he's done it with another woman before... interesting things.. The reality is that women and society expect me…
/r/seduction28/12/24 04:23 PM
2

Thank you for your response. And how do you feel when you think about it, or think about it?
/r/seduction28/12/24 09:07 AM
0

If it makes you feel better..
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 06:47 AM
0

If it makes you feel better..
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 05:29 PM
1

Then I guess they thees count. They're just the ones you linked to, right? : Women in Love Men in Love Of Love and War Schedules of Mating All-in-One Red Pill 101 Briffault's Law Relationships, the Red Pill, and you Sexual Utopia in Power that you guys talk about You don't really understand that not everyone hates women and talks about these things. However, what you may be thinking of is the bad reputation that comes from the group itself, because yes, unfortunately, almost everyone goes throug…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 03:02 PM
-1

I don't know where you looked, but I didn't really find anything similar. (I don't know where you got that from either.) By the way, just because someone else is talking about it scientifically doesn't mean that everyone is going to talk about it scientifically. I didn't say that everyone was approaching it scientifically I said that the "group" ideology is about looking for answers to the reality of the female nature. Your thinking is so black and white you are judging a whole group of people a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 01:52 PM
0

If it makes you feel better..
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 01:42 PM
-1

Learn a little more and learn to read. Again you are talking about PUA and not Red PIll.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 01:40 PM
1

You have no data on this, and it's silly to think of a whole bunch of people in black and white.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 06:14 AM
-1

Redpill is not PUA. Two different things.. please educate yourself before writing. Redpill is about the "real" way things work, truths, female nature, and the fields of "science/science/biology/psychology"... PUA is "pick up artist"... which is based on similar principles, i.e. certain strategies of social behavior, but is not nearly as proven or "fair" as redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 05:53 AM
3

I think it's an amazingly good book because it explains rationally why you choose someone. Be it a man or a woman. The language may be a bit technical, but it's amazing.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/24 02:33 PM
1

The exception is not the rule, and certainly not the average person.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/24 11:24 AM
5

That is not exactly a good book... unless your goal is to hate women.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/24 10:18 AM
1

There are quite a lot of ways you can tweak how the app is used. "Swipe.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 12:54 PM
1

Because of evoltution... because we used to decide who was a "successful" woman in terms of childbirth and who was not. It used to matter how intact you were, how big your waist was, and whether you were young. And surprise or no surprise, even though our technology has improved, our mammalian brains haven't.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 03:43 AM
7

hot woman.. and they have their problems too..
/r/TheRedPill21/10/24 06:28 PM
1

And.. why is that? 👀 Why someone would not like the one that they want?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 06:02 PM
1

I think the average person wouldn't be so self-conscious or wouldn't bother to fill out as much information about themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 03:30 PM
1

I don't know where the data or evidence for your last statement is, but I think it's called "habit".. We generally prefer those we spend more time with because we trust them and they become familiar to us. But that doesn't mean that "the two people fit together".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 01:47 PM
1

Just because your boyfriend didn't fit the picture doesn't mean the statement isn't true. I'm someone who looks for similar things, day in and day out, and I read all the comments, watch videos, talk to people, and in general it doesn't come "naturally" for people to get to know themselves... especially not men... especially not extroverted men..
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 01:43 PM
2

Otherwise you get absolutely flooded. I hadn't thought of that.. thanks for sharing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 10:45 AM
1

I know exactly what I'm looking for I'm glad you know, but I think the average person has no idea... Of course, I don't want to go into who, how, and why would fit together, but the average person doesn't know what they're looking for in a partner... To know you would need to look inside yourself, know yourself, and that takes time and experience. Which maybe older men have, but I don't think younger men have. I mean, this "knowing yourself" is not really popular in today's world, and without kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 10:38 AM
2

I don't think so.. I mean, if it were 50/50, men would probably use the "numbers game" and pull almost all women to the right to increase their chances.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 10:30 AM
1

many men have a wider range of view about whats compatible Where did you get that? focusing on compatilibility only benefits women I think the "point" of an "online" dating app is that instead of having to go to 100 or 200 people (which admittedly not many people would do, and mostly men) you can instead choose and "filter" from a lot of people to spend time with only those one's who is more likely to be right for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 10:28 AM
2

For the first one: One way to "approach" it is to say that apps care more about what women see on the app. Two reasons why women abandon apps: 1. Penis photos. 2. Too many choices (matches)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 06:55 AM
2

Dating is a competition, a zero sum game. I can only partially agree with this. I think today's dating apps are too much like that, but could be much more focused on the "win win" situation. If you can only stand out with pictures then I don't think you should expect the quality of today's dating apps to change. The best dating app for average people would be one that limit the options of attractive people and allow you to emphasize your main quality. So it would be good to limit the attractive …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 05:38 AM
1

Then I say "at first sight" in person.. For example, you can't really tell about a good looking man... who dresses in, say, minimalist style, or any kind of "manly" style that isn't nike shoes and zara etc..
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 08:13 AM
2

Why should we be surprised that people's looks are important? 😅 Why should we look at it all as if only women are superficial when everyone cares about looks? I'll add that most men, by evolution, care more about looks than women do. So why the outrage?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 08:10 AM
1

It is better to know the reasons than not to know. It's better to hear it from someone who can explain it normally and perhaps objectively, than to hear it from some redpilled neurotic in a version that portrays women in an incredibly bad light.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 08:03 AM
1

I don't think you can see wealth so clearly from the outside.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 07:54 AM
1

She probably mean mate chocie copying, just with an ovulation idea. The reason why a particular guy is "weird" is because women don't talk to him, and then "maybe" there is a reason. Women subconsciously note this and would rather not take a chance with that guy. But again, I'm "mind reading" this because no context was given by the intriguing woman about the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 04:11 AM
1

I mean, when should he talk to more girls? Maybe they are a relationship and then? Or when he's at school? Why should he talk to other girls? I have some idea what she means, but this, like a lot of tiktok videos, is like shitting on the porch and ringing the doorbell.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 04:07 AM
1

I see... so you are not the original poster? You know... who claimed that: Most men are what Esther Vilar called 'The Manipulated Man'. Or are you promoting her book? Not one word of yours is written down, because you quoted all of her and not just the one under the post? I'm making any argument Well, yes. I don't really believe in the argument part. More like you're shouting something and you don't care what anyone thinks, you're still shouting.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 09:57 AM
1

I can't help the fact that I'm right 🤷‍♂️ Perfect argument.🙌
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 08:51 AM
2

I don't need to. Disagreeing with someone is simply that, not agreeing with them. Alright -> having or showing dogged determination not to change one's attitude or position on something, especially in spite of good arguments or reasons to do so I'm not pushing anything. I made a post and you and other people chose to comment on it. So you're saying you're just taking a breath? (That this is just an innocent post?) That you didn't think this was a group where people "debate" or will debate what y…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 06:05 AM
2

Disagreeing with people isn't being stubborn. Look up the words. What do you think it is when someone is just pushing their own ideas and refuses to acknowledge any other opinion? It's not about who's right and who's wrong, it's about the fact that more than one person has told you that kneeling is a gesture, a cultural thing, etc... but you can only say "he who kneels begs" wow.. what an intellectual observation.. Yes, I'm selling something which is why I told people to buy my stuff, right? Als…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 03:48 AM
3

This guy is nuts... Why would someone come here and post in a "debate" community if they refuse to listen to what is being said to them? Even before yesterday there was a guy like this who couldn't be explained another point of view because he kept pushing one thing, his own.. u/2deepepetc go to the RedPill group and post there instead, because at least there will be more people on your side and they will agree more with your woman hating angry mentality, because that's what it is. Everyone can …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 04:54 PM
2

under the control of women. In what ways are women under domination? What is it that men cannot do because women do not allow it? When dating, men are expected to pay for dates, and even when they know they're being used. "logically" if "I" as a guy that takes a gril on a date, then I think it's basic that because listen again... "I asked her out" that "I" should probably pay for what we consume on that date, right? (let's not get into the 2nd 3rd date, and the pill splitting) Not just that, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 02:23 PM
2

Well, obviously it proves that what she wrote so long ago is what they are seeing today. Can you tell me what she wrote and what men today are seeing? Except men who relate to her book have first hand experience with women that proves to them what Esther Vilar wrote was right, so that was a terrible example. The example was about how easy it is to get someone to go to your camp if you only show one side. But tell me, what was the woman right about?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 12:52 PM
3

Just because they agree with what the book says does not prove anything. As I wrote... I can tell a person that the earth is flat, and if I'm convincing enough and provide some "real-looking" evidence, there's a chance they'll believe it. But that doesn't make what I say true.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 11:52 AM
2

The problem is that there is no "proof" for much of what she write. That's all. He generalized a lot and made weak arguments. I can write a book where I tell how men are so dominant and yes they do take advantage of women. All I have to do is gather all the examples that support "my" theory, and there you go... You're all what I said, aren't you? I'm not saying there isn't truth here and there, but she wasn't trying to describe "reality", but rather just her particular view of women at the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 07:12 AM
–

Women are way more shallow than men. Men find a much broader range of women to be physically attractive. Women find a much narrower range of men physically attractive. Both genders primarily date based on physical attraction For a man it's all about looks... having big breasts, a big ass and a nice face... I think there are plenty of women in the world who meet that criteria. On the other hand, the "character" of a man is important , how successful he is, how confident, how determined he is, etc…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 07:30 PM
–

Nicely worded response, I appreciate it. By the way, I see the comment was misdirected because it was intended for the poster. I also know that you just switched from no flair to Red Pill Man and started commenting against people's comments who appear to be RP or have RP flair. That's not true, because I've had it for a long time. You also respond with inflammatory comments directed towards the individuals in these cases. You do not debate in good faith. It's true that I'm a bit bad in my choice…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:52 PM
–

Remove yourself from this group if you are not able to reason clearly and logically.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:44 PM
–

Well I see the "debate" and the sensible "arguments" are with you. How nice that you want to "debate" the topic but you run away.. it's okay, I'm used to it. People do this when they lose the argument. :) You say in every other comment that "and how much women do sports" "Men go to the gym more", or don't you know what you write anymore? :D
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:43 PM
–

gender issues I don't really think it's such a big "problem", as it's more of fact, that you want to debate about. offends you It's not the debate that bothers me, because I like it... It bothers me when someone wants to argue in an idiotic way like you. Someone who confuses fact with fiction and is blessed with only one thing (sport). I saw a post today on a different subreddit about how men don’t put enough effort into their appearance and I disagreed so I thought I’d debate that idea here. Wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:36 PM
–

just this..: "And how much time does she spend at the gym?" You think sport is everything when it comes to looks... But just because someone plays sport doesn't mean they care about their looks... Because I guess you don't think that only the "physical" look (muscles) matters, and next to that your hair, your nails, your beard, your face can be so disgusting that you just look at it? Because that's what comes across from what you write... that you're blessed with sport, when it's only one part o…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:24 PM
–

I think people can't interpret in the comments. u/angelbaby933 said "before a date". I don't understand why it can't be understood that it's not about the sport, it's about before the date. Both parties prepare for the date, (sports are not part of "pre" date preparation) but women do "more" things to themselves than men. I don't understand how you can't understand such simple logic. Let's say both sexes play sports, both sexes have facial routines, both sexes pay attention to their hair, both s…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:17 PM
–

I mean, you can't read, or I don't understand: (n the first paragraph) In 2017–2018, the age-adjusted prevalence of obesity in adults was 42.4%, and there were no significant differences between men and women among all adults or by age group.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:10 PM
–

I don't really understand what the problem is here? *confusion*
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:07 PM
–

You have a problem with women. Tell me, what's the point of arguing about who puts more effort into looks? Whose life will be better if the man or the woman wins the argument? Yeah... the third one, you...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:05 PM
–

What does it have to do with who does how much sport, how much they care about their appearance? What do you mean? Ping pong? Chess? Ice football? What sport? By the way, just because someone "plays sports" which is a broad term... doesn't necessarily mean that they shower properly, have a basic facial routine, wear normal clothes, have good hair etc etc etc... you have a lot of wounds in your argument.. If i know correctly.. that women are generally more "hygienic". But there is a "logical" exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:02 PM
–

Relax, he's just looking for reasons why he's not successful with women. It's called red pill rage.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 04:53 PM
–

What she meant was that the choice of clothes, the make-up, are two things that "women" do not do easily, because they want to look good for men. BTW.. Who hurt you? I don't know who was offended you, but it's very simple to refute your idiotic argument... If both the man and the woman are doing sports and paying attention to their appearance, who is putting more effort into it? Yeah... the women... It's useless to answer people like you because you are in the "RedPillRage" phase. Maybe one day …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 04:52 PM
3

I would just say that balance is always the way to go. Always.. That's how you know that something is exaggerated or something is wrong, that it's just showing one side and not talking about the opposite side at all, or just having a bad opinion of it.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/24 09:43 AM
1

You mention three topics in one comment 😅. You talk about a specific case, I talk about an objective case. Every people goes for looks first, and every people wants a better partner than him/her. It's a different issue when, for what reason, which sex, why, chooses the opposite sex to their own level below. I have heard, and I suspect, that women generally need more than men. But this makes sense, because we men are at the top of the food chain (biologically) and we have little that we cannot ge…
/r/seduction27/09/24 05:50 PM
1

And guys want the same thing.. 🤷‍♂️
/r/seduction27/09/24 12:00 PM
1

I said "first". And also that it depends on how the app is set up. Let's say the first 20 people are at that person's level, and only the other 10 people are at other levels. If I understand what you mean, then again, the app itself would not be efficient if you have to choose from 5000 people (of all levels). However, if those 5000 people were at your level then you would (probably) get real dates out of it sooner (strong assumption). Of course, I'm not saying that it should be completely impos…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 07:52 PM
1

The apps reduce looks to a menu where everyone is available all at once, and you can sit there and swipe forever, or pay more money to bypass activity limits Yes, I've thought about that... I haven't heard that it can be done, but I'm sure it can be done with artificial intelligence or some deep learning method. The plan is to pair equally attractive people with equally attractive people... This would also help the beautiful to see the beautiful, (at least first) the average to see the average, …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 07:33 PM
1

I don't think the points you make are bad, although I think you are ignoring the fact that nobody cares what the "company" or person behind the company wants... The point of a successful current "dating app" has always been "What does the user want" ? We should not deny the reality that one way or the other, we will decide in the end based on looks. Even if we agree on personality... if I don't find the person attractive then I will definitely not meet him/her. Of course, you can say I'm picky, …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 06:34 PM
1

I understand what you're saying, but I was talking about the fact that there is no program that can find a pair for you, based on a picture alone.That requires more information. But I totally agree with you. I've read the comments here and the truth is that everyone chooses a mate based on their picture. But it's hard to find a mate when you have to search through 10.000 people (almost every dating app). It's just easier if you narrow down the 10.000 people to 500 based on goals, interests, pers…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 02:50 PM
6

Just because you were like that doesn't mean the average person is like you. It seems logical to me that at such a young age people haven't lived long enough to know the answers to many of these questions. Of course there are always exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 03:06 PM
3

How do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 03:03 PM
1

I understand that you expect your partner to have friends. But there are people who can empathise with people like me, for example. (You're probably an extrovert)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 03:03 PM
1

Not everyone has (or wants) friends. Some people just want a girlfriend. Or you have one or at most two friends, and there is no current partner in that group of friends..
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 02:43 PM
1

Yes.. and i'm not talking the 35-60 age range..
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 02:28 PM
1

Anyone know who the original poster was or some website?
/r/TheRedPill19/08/24 05:52 AM
1

What do you mean under "hope"?
/r/seduction16/08/24 12:54 PM
6

Agen, meaningless answer .
/r/seduction16/08/24 06:56 AM
5

How about not giving such big meaningless answers?
/r/seduction16/08/24 06:55 AM
–

I'm not saying that we are slaves to our nature of course... just that we should not deny that it does exist, and that it has considerable power. I wasn't talking about sex, I was talking about getting/meeting women. I didn't use "laid" I used "get girls" on purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 10:05 AM
–

To express my feelings. And to try to bring more information into this two-dimensional source of communication, so that you can get a better insight into the real intention of what I am saying. 🫡
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 09:50 AM
–

And why do you think men are less likely to talk about their problems in online spaces compared to women? As far as I know, men are usually on top of most online forums, like Reddit for example..
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 09:48 AM
–

Context is important... it's good to have sex with a woman if you "feel" something for her... and of course after a while you can satisfy each other better... but it's just as good to have sex with 100 women, because as I see it we men want as many women as possible, because that's how we're biologically designed and etc... just thought I'd note that it dose matter what context you say things in. I get that men get tired of the whole relationship thing because not the feminist women of today don…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 09:44 AM
–

I think you don't understand it all 😅. You must not have read what I wrote properly, because then you would have realized that I have this problem on "THREAD". Not with this group.. if someone writes that the sky is blue, can you still argue in the comment section that it's green.. or is there a rule that you can't ask a "question"? 😅
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 09:31 AM
–

So why the "question for men" badge then? 😅
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 08:45 AM
–

Yes 😅. About the nature of women... what they really want "in general"... say security, care, protection, sexuality.. Like how men often look at women through male eyes and assume that what the man wants is the same what the woman wants too.. And things like that.. And no... I'm not giving this kind of advice to "be yourself"... Instead I'm explaining why that advice is too broad, how people generally understand it, and that instead the advice should be "be your best self". Although when I expla…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 08:43 AM
–

How to get them to change their minds or how to communicate with them so that they are willing to change their unhealthy views.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 08:27 AM
–

I think you have little information about male/female dynamics.. it doesn't work like that 😅 you don't meet a woman, express your romantic interest, and have 3 seconds for her to throw herself at you naked... you ask her out "on a date" to get to know her personality.. to get to know what kind of person she is... you don't have to decide there, that's why you went on a date.. If you're a friend of a woman, it's hard to get out of that, into a lover. Think about it... you have a below average wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 04:22 AM
5

No. I know to others it may just look like that from the text. I just don't want the op to say or believe anything about him that isn't true. There are a lot of people like that in the world... who are told to just be yourself etc etc... they believe that's all they need and then wonder why they can't get the woman. So let me rephrase. "Be realistic/critical of yourself. If you've done everything you can to look good, then you can safely believe you're at your "best". But if you have a lot to im…
/r/seduction05/08/24 04:00 AM
2

Start small. go up and ask something you would ask a stranger... like the time, a place you are looking for etc.. (this will help to make "going there" itself feel natural) Next time, try to talk to them a little about what kind of place they recommend in the area for chilling. Or maybe observe something about them and talk about it. (small-talk) If you can already small-talk, try to compliment them. Make it simple... their hair, or their clothes whatever.. and then you can move on to the next o…
/r/seduction04/08/24 06:25 PM
0

The problem is the mentality, yes... but don't think you're handsome if you're not.
/r/seduction04/08/24 06:17 PM
-3

A f.king incel comment agen.. nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 08:40 AM
-1

So tell me, how many women have you approached?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 08:28 AM
-1

Why the fuck do you have to keep saying that shit? "It only works for those who are attractive".. Maybe you shouldn't go to women with a lot of make-up on, and superfecial looking woman, if you ever did.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 03:34 AM
1

Op is just a typical incel looking for an excuse. Look at a few comments when he replies to people and you'll see. Unfortunately there are a lot of people like that in this group. And they take time away from us. We help people because we think they really need help. Instead, when you offer a solution, they just make excuses.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 03:17 AM
1

Okay, I'm not going to give you a story time... The point of the cold approach is to express your sexual/romantic interest in a strange woman. And obviously (I think it's pretty obvious) you have to show your sense of humor, that you're confident, that you're a man and x y z stuff... man... If she's curious about you, you can ask her out on an instant date or talk to her for 10-20 minutes to show her that... that's how it works... you don't have to date for 2 months to let her know you're not an…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 06:45 PM
1

So it's only at work and school and places like that that you can show her that you're worth geting to know... that's it. I don't think I'm the one who's not clear on what a cold approach is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 06:34 PM
1

Erm... yes... You can't get this one out... Maybe! Let's say if you make a big impression "in person", say because she already knows your sense of humor, knows you're relatively confident, and has seen what you look like in person... then you "might" have a better chance of that not happening.. Compared to just seeing your 2d dry messages online.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 06:28 PM
1

I think anyone who's a little bit familiar with the subject knows that the ROI are pretty bad in numbers... but let me give you two weak examples: A pretty good girl who has 550 hits on tinder, better than better, but she doesn't really know them, she's only seen their pictures. Then you come along, who he can get to know "instantly", and if you're a good person in life, and you're good with women, you present yourself well, then whoops, you're the first person he knows better then those 550.. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 06:24 PM
1

How do you mean? You start talking to each other and she just walks away? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 06:15 PM
0

It is ironic that in order to have a larger social circle, or to have one at all, you have to reach out to "strangers".. It's ironic that you have to do the same with women. Can you tell me the positives of cold approach or do you only know the negatives?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 06:12 PM
-1

Hmm. And what about people who don't have one, or have a damn small one? 🤯 meet people live to have more?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 05:13 PM
-2

Incel warning.. Do you think it's better to chat someone online and then getting ghosted affter 3 days? Or hearing stories from a friend that might not be true? Ah right... don't even find out in person and ask for a date... don't get social skilled..
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 04:47 PM
1

Probably 100 is not the right target if you have had two so far. It should be 5. Then 10. Or as many as was ok so far + one. Do as much as it takes you out of your comfort zone. If you set a goal too high, chances are you won't reach it, and then you'll beat yourself up.
/r/seduction01/08/24 11:09 AM
-1

It's not that women don't approach man... for a woman, attraction doesn't consist of seeing a body. Yes, she can obviously go for the 'tall' 'handsome' man... because he is objectively handsome. (But especially tall) Whereas we just see a woman and want to take her to bed. To the woman, it's like you're trying to pick up a random guy. I mean, there can be about as much attraction in women, on the outside. You can decide if a man is handsome or not. For them, it's just that. They don't have the d…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 11:05 AM
2

As the internet came in the typical few men a woman could choose from suddenly jumped from 5 candidates to 250 Is it the dating apps and social media? Maybe?
/r/seduction28/07/24 07:41 AM
-5

comprehension The alternative to "just be yourself" is "be your better self" in most cases. But again... I don't understand what you're talking about because I didn't write in relation to what you were responding to. I agree with the last part.
/r/seduction28/07/24 07:08 AM
3

I will ask IS this about getting laid or dating? I mean... if you're dating you're probably going to have sex after a while... Cuz even a hunchback can find a girl to date. You mean a man? I doubt it. You act like a man with your friends (girls) and at least 1 out of like 10 will date you. I think men used to be more forward than they are now... but yeah the ratio is not bad. But "friendship" is not the first step if you want to approach dating effectively and don't want to waste your time. Ther…
/r/seduction28/07/24 07:02 AM
-26

I don't understand what you're talking about either, because that's not what I wrote about.
/r/seduction28/07/24 06:08 AM
2

Thank you very much for this useful and well-worded comment. I could not have written it better myself. Yes, the reason is very important. I wish your dad good health.
/r/seduction23/07/24 06:19 PM
0

I don't know.. the fact that she describes that she did it "directly" and that she was curious to see how you would react, I think indicates a pretty interesting woman. 🤨
/r/TheRedPill18/07/24 05:44 AM
2

I didn't say online dating was "good" (especially with the range of dating apps available today.) I said that many people (introverts) find it easier to meet there.
/r/seduction15/07/24 10:23 AM
4

Another angry little boy who is angry at the world. Do you think the average person who doesn't spend their days here knows another solution? This is easier and simpler for many. Frankly, most people (I think) are more introverted and online is easier for them.
/r/seduction15/07/24 09:27 AM
1

Feminism wants equality, and women say what other women say. So even if feminists are idiots and ignorant of reality, women still repeat what other women say because they are social beings
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 07:27 PM
2

Every woman cares about money... I don't know what coach you had or what context he said it in, but every woman cares about your ability to support your family. If your wife is going to have a baby and stay home with the baby, you're going to have to live on your salary.
/r/seduction12/07/24 11:25 AM
2

Every woman cares about money... I don't know what coach you had or what context he said it in, but every woman cares about your ability to support your family or her. If your wife is going to have a baby and stay home with the baby, you're going to have to live on your salary.
/r/seduction12/07/24 11:22 AM
5

The problem is that you care too much about what "others" think of you. I mean, that's what I get from the way you write. "Urgently" "quickly" "instantly" etc... if you'd learned the game for years you'd know exactly how to get women "quickly". The relationship part is a whole different ball game.
/r/seduction02/07/24 07:34 AM
1

Yes, humans (human brain) always look for the easiest way to solve a problem. However, to get a more complete picture they would have to invest more energy, which most people are not designed to do. I think that just because someone is an "adult" does not mean that they can give objective advice. But as far as I know, yes... "expecting" or "assuming" objective advice from women is just plain stupid in most cases. But I didn't expect an objective answer to the question I asked there, because I do…
/r/seduction02/07/24 06:59 AM
1

Why is it so good?
/r/seduction21/06/24 06:22 AM
1

The second question is the better one. I am asking where people who interested i dating woman, find advice or answers.
/r/seduction20/06/24 05:25 AM
1

Because the vibe of the app is not about "meeting" or "talking". Besides, you have to strike while the iron is hot. If you're going to chat with her online and barely IRL, you're going to be like the other 2500-odd sex-starved men on snapchat.
/r/seduction18/06/24 10:57 AM
0

Stop with the "what if I meet those type of women" bullshit man. You don't seem to know what a cold approach is and you certainly don't know the risks of dating or finding a mate. Let me enlighten you... you're not going to meet 98 times out of 100 the woman who's going to be your girlfriend. Do you know that cold approach rates are somewhere in the 100/10 range? Which means you're sure as hell not gonna meet rigjt away the woman of your dreams soon. I don't get the dating thing. If you get a da…
/r/seduction18/06/24 10:51 AM
0

Yes, in the chat window you will see a picture of her with a message saying "you can come".
/r/seduction18/06/24 10:41 AM
8

I think it's great what you're doing and I'm happy for you. Keep it up. But now a more direct answer. Since you said you don't look very good, I would advise you to do your best to look your best. Facials, well fitting clothes, good hair, etc. Whatever anyone says, those first 5 minutes are going to weigh a lot in the first few seconds. I saw in the comments that someone said you shouldn't cold approach, "even extroverts can't do it". That's the way the sekeptical people think, and I have to say…
/r/seduction18/06/24 10:38 AM
1

It's not necessarily a bad thing to "ask", but women want you to "know" when to kiss. Because if you "know" then it shows that you're experienced, that you understand how this "dating" thing works. So it's best to know when to kiss a woman, but it's not the end of the world to ask. (Although the latter is less masculine/experienced/confident in my eyes.)
/r/seduction15/06/24 04:12 AM
1

If you are in more than one place, it feels like you are on "more than one date".
/r/seduction15/06/24 03:54 AM
2

True!
/r/seduction28/05/24 12:06 PM
1

It's sad that everyone is allowed to have tags of this type.
/r/seduction28/05/24 11:54 AM
1

I do not fully agree. Obviously, you would 100% know if they told you (if they actually knew that was the problem for them.) But yes... people will not tell you what their problem is. The only way to get close to the truth is to have knowledge or experience. If you're antisocial and barely talk at a job interview, they're unlikely to think you're very social. But because you are antisocial.. you don't know why they didn't call you back. You did what you can. It's the same with a lot of people. E…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 08:47 AM
1

I mean... everyone is subconsciously playing with each other. I mean, without even knowing it. I think you just have to play better. When someone girl/guy being a jerk to you by not showing up , look back at what you did wrong and learn from it so you can be a better next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 06:04 AM
3

You need to learn "Game" my brother.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 06:01 AM
0

Women mean what they say. And my friend women are better at recognizing social cues than men in general. That's why they say they can "sense" when someone is desperate. Not one word, not one action, but many "signs".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 06:42 PM
–

It seems that the one who started the debate doesn't really dare to debate..
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 03:00 PM
1

What is this equal rights? 😂 The world doesn't work on paper based rules... Do you think a woman can protect you as much as you can protect her? Or can you look after the child, educate, be patient and caring in the same way as a "woman" who is like that in "nature"? Or can a woman do the same hard work as a man? 😄
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:29 PM
1

The problem is that men and women are not the same... men are told to "find a woman" and women are told to " a man will find you". Men are told to get a job, be successful, be a man, be confident, protect yourself and your partner. To the woman, be beautiful, well-groomed, kind, supportive. We're not the same, we weren't raised the same, and we don't have the same biology or the same mindset. So I hope it's clear that just because you think it's the "right" thing to do doesn't mean people will c…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:21 PM
1

Do you realise what kind of stitation we are talking about? If you go out to eat with your mate, you're obviously paying for your own. But it's a "date" if it hasn't worked out yet. Different situations - different rules. What is the logic of "adult = pays for food" ? It's mostly true in itself, but without context it's pretty broad. But as you interpret it = "I ask a woman out on a date and expect her to pay her share because she's an adult. " O.O
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:11 PM
0

I see you didn't understand what I wrote. It's a "social" thing, you know? I mean. If you bump into someone you apologise, if someone lets you go ahead you say thanks... if a "stranger" asks you out for dinner (a date) you pay, because he asked you out. I think it's just common sense. Obviously who can pay, but again: 1. She didn't ask you out and you are a random stranger. 2. You can offer to pay for "half" or all of it, it's just that the world doesn't have the view that women pay on the "firs…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:00 PM
0

I don't know who hurt you, but get well soon. It is true that women love men differently than we love women. But a man paying on the first date is a common thing. It's usually the men who ask the women out... so why should the woman pay? Imagine for a second that someone invites you to lunch or dinner and expects "you" to pay for the food. How would you feel? I'd add that if the vibe wasn't right, you certainly wouldn't feel like paying for something someone wanted from you and didn't get. And y…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 11:48 AM
1

Women do this with other women, but not with men. I mean, not for the same reason. When women give advice on dating, they want to be "politically correct.".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 03:31 AM
1

You talk about exceptions... the rule remains the same..
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 02:54 PM
1

"If someone doesn't have the emotional maturity to get over themselves and text you first" You need to learn some female natrue.. "the "stop searching" part should come because you don't need a relationship to be happy and not just because you gave up." No... because it appears as you read it... Because everyone who reads it interprets it that way... it's as simple as that. Anyone who hears that advice will think, "Oh... great, I'll do something else and someone will come along and take me out o…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 01:53 PM
5

"hence all the ugly/overweight people dating "above their league"" Where exactly? You've brought up two groups that even a good personality can't really help..
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 01:44 PM
3

Why do many men say that older women or single moms are less desirable for dating? That's why.. (what i just wrote). "once all 25 out of 25 women in their 20s reject you" So if younger women reject me, say 25 out of 25 (I don't know why) , then I'm forced to turn to older women (What?) I think there are enough women in the world for men to keep trying young women as long as they want. "then reality kicks in" I think you should do some research on the reality of how male and female values work in…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 10:12 AM
5

Very simple... men prefer young, intact women. A 30-year-old woman is not so young. And why would I choose an older woman, with someone else's child... when I can choose a younger woman without children?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 04:43 AM
–

I mean... obviously some people don't write back because they're not that interested in you, but personally as an extreme introvert... if I'm "not in the mood" then sometimes I don't write back for days. If it's my girlfriend, it's the same... but obviously sooner or later we'll meet and talk in person anyway. Us introverts often just don't have the social energy to write.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 06:51 AM
1

They don't..
/r/TheRedPill23/04/24 12:58 PM
3

I don't understand this advice to "wait and don't write, don't look for her for days"... I mean.. such a man lives under a rock? (No offense) I mean a woman might think that you don't write back (the next day) because you thought she was just a one night stand... I add that a woman has not one place to spare 50-100 guys at least, on instagram, tinder, or even facebook. So you say "relax she won't forget" I don't think it's that hard for her. Of course you've met her, that's different. And there …
/r/TheRedPill08/04/24 10:51 AM
6

Because it's a pretty broad advice, and you can't really tell from those three words what the writer means "exactly" 👍
/r/TheRedPill08/04/24 10:29 AM
2

Yes, i agree with that!
/r/seduction24/03/24 03:55 PM
16

I mean, if you never see her again then it's never mind, doesn't it?
/r/seduction24/03/24 11:23 AM
2

Where? 👀
/r/TheRedPill22/03/24 12:30 AM
2

I'm not saying that it's all about texting, but that he mentions texting (in addition to talking about the top priority) so that on that surface one can determine how much the top priority is in the woman's eyes. But I wrote (to which I didn't get an answer) that I don't think you will set the standard with your appearance (what you see online) or your text (what you write in the chat). But with how you present yourself ln real life. I clearly understand that this is not what the post is about..…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/24 12:28 AM
1

"I think you are way overly focused on the texting aspect. Texting isn't the point of his post" "His article isn't about texting." I also think I overthink the texting part of the post: But there is only one way to find out. Hit her up. See how she responds. Like I said, you'll know. I've had girls be into me and be their top option right off the bat. It does happen. You might need to build a tad of rapport over 3-5 message exchanges, but it can happen if you are attractive enough with a strong …
/r/TheRedPill21/03/24 11:35 PM
1

I have more than one conclusion. Can you be a little more specific? The article is about how to write to a woman if you are not her top priority and how she reacts if you are. I (also) said that in chat you can't be her top priority if you haven't chatted in person. I mean, don't expect to sweep her off her feet just by chatting online.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/24 07:19 AM
1

Disagree. I'm not English, so I'm not sure I understand exactly, but I don't think you have to win a woman over with a message and find out whether you're her first priority or not. It has to be in person. Unless you're a writing king, you're probably not going to win her over in chat. I also don't understand why you have to have a guy who is top priority for her. Maybe there's no one in the picture right now. The point is, you don't know that. I think 10-20 days is a long time... because then s…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/24 06:35 AM
1

Perhaps because he's not looking for "search results", but for "people's" opinions.
/r/seduction08/03/24 05:06 AM
15

Verry sexual, and romantic 😉
/r/seduction30/01/24 07:26 PM
2

You can express gratitude for things and still achieve the ones you've set your sights on. Have you heard the saying, "the best vitamin for the body is gratitude"? You heard it right, "vitamin" isn't a gas or a food drink. It's not something essential. You can be grateful for many things (actually anything), but gratitude is just a little thing that helps you "feel better." You don't have to be grateful for what you haven't achieved, and probably a therapist won't say this... that's why I don't …
/r/TheRedPill25/11/23 04:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter