TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RepresentativeSwan1 Archive

View 18 posts and 1,764 comments by RepresentativeSwan1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
261

CMVRepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:35 PM
90

Question For WomenRepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/20 01:53 AM
53

Purge Week!RepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/20 06:11 PM
36

ScienceRepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 07:29 PM
10

Purge CMV!RepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 09:24 PM
7

RepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:32 PM
5

ScienceRepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:02 AM
5

Question For WomenRepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:15 AM
4

Question For WomenRepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 05:26 PM
3

Question For WomenRepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 05:37 AM
2

RepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 04:40 PM
2

Purge Week!RepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 09:05 PM
2

ScienceRepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/20 09:20 PM
1

Question For MenRepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 09:38 PM
1

Purge Debate!RepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 08:48 PM
1

ScienceRepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:37 PM
1

Purge Debate!RepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 04:40 PM
0

Purge Science!RepresentativeSwan1/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 06:07 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,764 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

How much do women have to tell you guys that looks really aren't everything. They are everything if they are the thing that women are disqualifying you on the basis of. And I would say that the significant majority of men who struggle with dating do so precisely because women disqualify them on the basis of looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:44 AM
1

It is a problem for a large, increasing percentage of men. Sexlessness among young men has tripled in the last decade, and unless you expect that trend to stop now for some reason, it's going to be a problem for even more.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:39 AM
1

I already said what in my first comment; the blatant undeniable reality of an increasingly liberated female sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:28 AM
9

Hip dips. Not extreme ones but I like slight hip dips that give the upper hip and quads more curve. Hate seeing women get BBLs to fill out their hip dips and ending up looking like trannies because they misdiagnosed the issue and now their mid hip is the widest point of their hips. Ideal hips are always widest at the height of the bottom of the crotch. So if you're a woman considering getting a BBL please ensure they don't make the middle (or even worse, the upper) part of your hip the widest po…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:18 AM
4

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:05 AM
1

I wouldn’t nor do I know any other man that would be driven to your side on our driest spell. And yet redpill/you-know-what-pill ideology is being increasingly adopted by gen-z men, regardless of whether any of the "men you know" will be driven to our side or not (and you are probably also underestimating the number of "men you know" who are already on our side or on their way in secrecy). Like someone replied, real life shows us that most people are dating normally and getting married every day…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 10:17 PM
1

Very wishful thinking
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 10:01 PM
1

Congrats, you just won the worst reading comprehension of the year award.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 09:54 PM
1

You're right, society isn't about to reckon with that, because that's not what's happening lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 09:49 PM
2

Bra size?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 09:38 PM
4

It is going to be very interesting to watch normie society be forced to reckon with the blatant undeniable reality of an increasingly liberated female sexuality. It is only going to drive more and more men to our side and I am eagerly anticipating it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 09:30 PM
1

Ok I know I said nvm, but I can't help myself. It is psychotic to not draw a distinction between attraction to prepubescent girls and attraction to postpubescent teenage girls. It can still be wrong for an adult to act on both of them, but the former is highly abnormal disordered sexuality whereas the latter is practically normal male sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 09:25 PM
2

Well technically pedophilia would be attraction to pre... actually nvm
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 08:56 PM
4

The video is practically a documentary.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 08:53 PM
2

Still excruciatingly sexless ofc. I left because I was just spending all my free time on the server, but it turns out now I'm just spending my time on Reddit and this sub instead :( Glad to hear I am missed tho lol, but I intend on not returning if I can help it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 08:24 PM
1

So nothing juicy happened like a girl becoming his "Discord kitten"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 08:13 PM
1

What exactly is my double standard?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 08:05 PM
3

You had your high school teacher as a friend on Discord? Interesting. Tell me more.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 07:50 PM
1

A healthy weight woman considers herself premium luxury because men treat her like she is.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 07:49 PM
1

Goals
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 07:44 PM
3

What is amazing about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 07:41 PM
1

You disagree with the philosophy of... wanting to see your friends get what they want?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 07:37 PM
1

How can you "disagree" with me saying I don't want to see my friend with an ugly woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 07:26 PM
1

Ok, I don't agree, but I don't particular care for whether it semantically qualifies as 'settling' or not. What I care about is the things I mentioned; that my friend doesn't wake up next to an ugly face every day, or see an ugly face across from him over dinner, or see an ugly face on the end of his dick etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 07:21 PM
1

Which is settling if your looksmatch is less than satisfactory.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 06:34 PM
1

So? Just because she didn't have a choice doesn't mean I want my friend to settle for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 06:22 PM
1

But he wasn't, nor was it his choice. I don't want to see a friend settle for less just because of something he can't control.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 06:15 PM
1

Wdym? Would you say 6 is better than 'ok' or worse?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 06:09 PM
1

Well idrc about "balance", I care about my boy not having to wake up next to an ugly face, or having to look at an ugly face over dinner, or having to see an ugly face sucking his dick etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 06:08 PM
5

Who are you parasocially involved with? I am in love with an OnlyFans girl I'm subscribed to. Does that count?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 06:02 PM
1

She's ok, I think I'd rate about 6. She looks very caucasian though, I doubt her body has much shape. I'd probably say yes out of desperation but I likely wouldn't feel satiated by her. I'd much rather date a facially uglier woman with shapely ass/tits/hips/legs.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 05:58 PM
1

I don't think women like cleaning other people's stuff but they do love cleaning their own home. It's nesting. It makes absolute evolutionary sense that women would've evolved to derive pleasure from keeping their nest clean and tidy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 05:47 PM
0

I do, but I don't "love to see it". What is there to love about seeing a homie settle for an ugly chick?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 05:43 PM
0

Who would rather spend their weekend cleaning than doing a favorite hobby Cleaning IS many women's favorite hobby.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 05:38 PM
1

Please don't ever say that to your husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 05:36 PM
1

Sure, but I thought it might be something you come to desire anyway. Lots of women describe desiring certain traits about a man after developing feelings for him that they originally felt meh about.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 04:30 PM
1

My condolences to your future husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 04:16 PM
1

So the fact that you love him doesn't make you desire it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 04:07 PM
1

Are you married?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 03:27 PM
2

Q4MarriedWomen: do you enjoy the taste of your husband's semen? Personally I do not think I would feel attractive to a woman if she wasn't hungry for my semen.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 02:57 PM
5

Men can't change the things that women refuse to date men on the basis of (hint; it's not the things you mentioned).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 01:10 AM
9

It's not hindering either.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 12:10 AM
0

No, because women can't be cucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 09:57 PM
13

By simply observing what traits correlate with male sexual success (or lack of). Misogyny isn't one of them in either direction. If you're asking about me in particular; women treated me no differently before I was a misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 07:05 PM
0

Do not understand at all how a man can be happy with a woman he knows has had bigger dicks than him. He must be a cuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 06:47 PM
0

Depends. Can I solicit the services of the daughter myself?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 06:43 PM
11

It isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 06:40 PM
2

Today the relationship between B and C would be described as correlation caused by a confounding factor, A. You're right, we aren't disagreeing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 06:38 PM
1

A confounding factor is a third variable that has a causal relationship with the two correlating variables. So, if a correlation between two variables exists, then either; One is causing the other. Both are caused by a third (or more) factor. It is a coincidence. Or some mix of all three which is certainly possible (although again coincidence is increasingly unlikely the larger the sample).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 06:06 PM
1

Do you know what a confounding factor is
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 05:45 PM
1

Correlation either means causation, confounding causation, or coincidence. The larger the sample size the more unlikely it is that the correlation is coincidence, and oftentimes the distinction between causation and confounding causation is not important to the context in which the correlation is being discussed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 05:07 PM
21

Actually, misogyny has zero affect on the quality of one's life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 04:42 PM
2

a fat chick who wants a millionaire Not analogous. A woman who only wants a millionaire is highly anomalous in her standards, thus that is the proximate cause of her singledom. Whereas a man who merely wants a non-fat childless woman is not anomalous at all in his standards. What is anomalous about him is his unattractiveness, thus that is the proximate cause of his singledom. It would be very strange framing that we wouldn't apply in any other aspect of life to look at an anomalous outcome and …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 04:34 PM
1

Everybody Women only want the top 10-20ish percent. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 04:04 PM
6

If your only options are fat women and single moms, then your (un)attractiveness is the cause of your lack of success, not your standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 04:02 PM
11

Lmao saying “no” doesn’t make you right I gave no less of an argument against your claim than you gave for your claim. no one wants to date a loser only obsessed with finding someone. Incorrect, lots of people want to date women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 03:40 PM
11

No it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 02:42 PM
6

They will if the lack of happiness and a dissatisfaction with life is caused by the lack of a girlfriend, which it usually is in the case of girlfriendless men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 02:42 PM
4

Virtually no man is caused singledom predominantly by his standards or not putting himself out there enough. Most men's singledom is predominantly caused by women's standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 02:35 PM
11

In my experience it's very rare for a guy to have everything, good career, active social life, purpose etc and not be able to find a romantic relationship with anyone. This is not rare at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 02:11 PM
29

Why is it that an honest answer like this is not the answer given 99% of the time? I have my own theories as to why but I would like to know what other people believe is the reason why.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 02:10 PM
43

Women and their male allies are extremely motivated to ensure that men stay pacified by the endless treadmill of self improvement and the great lie that women are not the cause of their misery.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 02:07 PM
16

If you have a full happy life with regular exercise, a good diet, enjoy your work, have many hobbies and many close fulfilling friendships you won’t be depressed because of lack of romance. That’s a fact. That's not a fact. If you do get a gf your problems in life won’t just disappear If your problems are lack of a girlfriend, then your problems would disappear if you got a girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 01:44 PM
1

I would estimate that a solid majority of men never experience a woman being into them like this ever in their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 11:17 PM
8

or you can just find somebody who likes what you like. No, the average man cannot "just find" that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 02:41 AM
1

a guy on PPD asking, talking about how he really liked this girl, but she didn't want to have sex with him until in a relationship and he was all "but it's too soon, I rather hang and have sex for 4-7 months before deciding that, what if the sex is bad?" Is that supposed to be unreasonable? Or are you saying she was being unreasonable
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 08:05 PM
1

Yes. Jfc I hope you didn't get them reduced...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 11:48 PM
2

You'd be okay with dating a man who would prefer to date a 20 year old, and only isn't because that option isn't available to him? X doubt sis.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 04:03 PM
2

How is that not an enormous advantage? A decade+ more of good sex doesn't sound like an enormous advantage to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 04:00 PM
6

Big butts for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 01:37 PM
1

You are only looking at the shell. Congratulations for being so shallow! As if women are any different. Your only advantage is that they are easier to manipulate. Can women please make their mind up on whether it's easier or harder for men to date younger than to date their own age. That is the only reason why an adult man would choose a 20yo still at uni for a ‘relationship’. No it isn't. There's also the advantage I suggested. Also younger women aren't as jaded and carrying all the baggage tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 12:01 PM
0

Why should a well balanced, educated, accomplished man in their 30s want to have a relationship with a 20 yo? Do you not understand the enormous advantage to dating a 20 yo over a woman in her 30s? Not only is the 20 yo hotter, but more importantly she's going to be hot for a whole decade longer than the 30s woman. That doesn't sound like an advantage to you? Basically still a child. No, not basically still a child. After 18 age barely correlates with maturity. And certainly physically they are …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 11:48 AM
5

Women care lol. Women don't want to be with a man who is only not with a 20 year old because the 20 year old isn't available to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 11:39 AM
1

How would anyone possible know the lifetime average of people who are only 20 years old now. Do tell. That lifetime average stat is of people born 70 years ago, not 20. We have no idea what the lifetime average will be of people who are 20 now.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 01:10 PM
2

Very few men are lacking those to such an extent that those are the reasons they're struggling. You have to be Elliot Rogers tier in those traits for them to be the reason. For the vast majority, their looks are the reason they're struggling.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 01:44 PM
4

You mean good looks
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 12:25 PM
1

If she’s not attracted you she wouldn’t be trying to date you in the first place. How naive. Plenty of women will settle when she's nearing 30 or already past it for a man who doesn't particularly excite her sexually, but who's company she still enjoys and who is a safer option to commit to long-term and start a family with. That's not attraction, though. Attraction is sexual. You are honestly the one creating your own problems here No, the genetic lottery and female sexuality is creating my pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 09:30 AM
1

Relevance?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 06:52 PM
–

Female sexlessness is entirely voluntary. Virtually all women could get nontransactional sex with an at least average member of the opposite sex. Female sexlessness is a bad thing for men, not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 04:20 PM
–

Have you had women tell you you're too small? No. I'm a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 03:38 PM
–

The dickpill is the most brutal of the pills. I'm 6.5x5.1 which is above average, but still would not be enough for women. On this topic though, we do not talk enough about vaginal size and elasticity. It is a travesty how men have allowed women to place 100% of the blame on penis size when that's only half of the equation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 03:20 PM
2

No, not reject every woman, just the ones who aren't attracted to you. If she wouldn't have found you attractive when she was younger, she likely doesn't now either, even if she's willing to date you. She's just prioritizing things other than attraction now. If you're really desperate, then at most you should date her for access to her body, but never marry or have kids with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 03:04 PM
–

For their age, 1st girl is below avg, 2nd girl is about avg, 3rd and 4th are above avg.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 02:11 PM
2

Do not listen to the female propaganda about men dating younger women. Women will often try to deter men from going for younger women by asserting that they will only ever be interested in you for your money. To be clear, that may very well be true. But if it is, then it is also true of women your own age. You would not gain anything at all by dating a woman your own age. There is no valid reason for a man to not date as young as possible if that option is available to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:07 AM
10

Maybe someone can explain to me this concept if rejecting women today because “she wouldn’t have given me the time of day 15 years ago.” Huh? How do you know? You didn’t even know her. If all the women you interacted with for 15 years refused to date you, then it's very likely that this woman would've too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:04 AM
1

Fat/ugly women don't count
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:01 PM
–

Yea he can't even shout right, he sounds like a yelping nerd.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 07:15 PM
–

He is ugly and bald and a John. When will red pillers learn that women's vaginas only care about looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 06:40 PM
–

Everything you said shows how it's Chad vs average dudes. The guy on Tinder is hot. The guy in the video is not. That is why women treat them differently and subsequently they have different attitudes towards women. There is no world where the guy in the video becomes the guy on Tinder, and that is solely because of how he looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 06:30 PM
–

Former obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 06:25 PM
14

Okay, but the point I’m trying to make is that you can be a 10/10 in looks and still be rejected for other reasons. Why do women think this is a salient point to make? It's incredible how many women all independently come to the same conclusion that this asinine point is a worthwhile thing to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 06:42 PM
4

Doesn't matter. The things you can change don't matter if the thing you can't change disqualifies you anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 06:37 PM
1

It seems like a lot of dudes simultaneously want to be accepted for being average, while also being perceived by their women as the best/hottest. Duh. Yes, people want to find someone who thinks they're exceptional even though they can recognize themself as being objectively pretty average.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 07:59 PM
1

...to the exclusion of average men, but not average women* That's the other half of the picture you're missing in your statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 01:36 AM
8

So are PPD women gonna keep pretending that men's increasing lack of success with women isn't going to have any consequences
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 03:16 AM
–

Women fucked around and found out.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 10:51 AM
5

That's right, because the reason she's dating them matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 05:39 AM
5

It's men, not women, who only think with their genitals The fact that thinking about non-Chads means you're not thinking with your genutals is precisely what those men are complaining about. Men want to be what she thinks about when she thinks with her genitals.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 04:30 AM
3

Lol women already played that card. Can't take sex away from people you were never giving it to.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 08:16 PM
5

Clearly you're not going far enough, they just took your rights sis.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 02:35 PM
9

Not all women go for Chad Your anecdote didn't disprove that. Showing that X trait isn't sufficient for Y outcome doesn't prove that X trait isn't necessary. She doesn't want to. Exactly. I have male friends who haven't sex in a year and aren't on Tinder. By your definition of my female friend they are voluntarily celibate. This is like saying a poor person is choosing poverty because they refuse to buy a lottery ticket. Your female friend would almost certainly be able get sex with an at least …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 02:35 PM
5

I don't know, ask OP. I didn't link the GSS data.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 02:00 PM
9

That data is based on a sample size of 23 men and 30 women, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 01:46 PM
11

I’d argue that’s false. One of my friends has never been propositioned by a man. She's an involuntarily relationshipless woman. She could go on Tinder and find sex with an at least average man within a few hours if she wanted. Do you expect women to just have sex with everyone to “solve this issue”? No. There is no solution. But just because there's no solution, doesn't mean it's not an issue. many men who asked me for sex or dates were attractive and had sex with many women, but I found their p…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 01:41 PM
10

It’s not “precipice of inceldom” to not have sex for a year. What? Yes, it is. By that definition I’m also on the precipice of inceldom. Volceldom*. There are no involuntarily celibate women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 01:08 PM
10

Mine polls all students, The study you linked was conducted between 2005 and 2011. Stop referencing it, it is out of date. That said 43% are virgins. Yes, and only 34% were sexually active. That gives you a sense of how sex actually distributes. The average is on the precipice of inceldom.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 01:04 PM
5

I literally just linked one that did last year.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 12:48 PM
13

OCT. 21, 2015
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 12:43 PM
35

Don’t the studies show 72% of young men have had sex in the last year Those stats are from 2018. The situation has worsened since then.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 12:35 PM
19

Where are you getting those stats from? Recent stats say that the majority of men in college aren't having sex. Having sex once in college is the precipice of inceldom.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 12:34 PM
1

It's sad because the world is sad, not the view.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 12:17 PM
46

You are either referring to old men, or you're not paying attention to the statistics. The average young man is already on the precipice of inceldom. If the current trends continue as this post was positing, then the average man will be outright incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 12:16 PM
105

Women seeing no value in the average man is precisely the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 12:10 PM
13

What planet are you living where those are women's standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 12:09 PM
1

Why does it make a difference to you? Revenge. like men got one over on women. We did.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 11:58 AM
3

If you were faced with the prospect of being raped continuously for the rest of your life, would you not consider suicide?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 11:54 AM
-7

Has anyone else found women's collective reeing today quite cathartic? After so many years of being forced to hear women whine about the most first-world problems imaginable, it feels good to see them finally given something real to whine about. Hope this leads to many more decisions being overturned and many more days like today.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 07:42 AM
1

There's no other option.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 06:23 AM
1

No, both of those are equally impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 06:05 AM
1

Yes. Or at least didn't give you the treatment your current partner gave you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 05:56 AM
1

Yea that's disgusting tbh. Glad you made her an ex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 05:42 AM
1

Yes it was. You just revealed that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 05:33 AM
1

Even if she hadn't been like that it would've been okay. Nah, you wouldn't have been okay with it, and you revealed this in your previous comment where you felt the need to debunk my claim that you were happy with less, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 05:24 AM
1

That's not the treatment the average man gets, at all. My question was about average men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 05:18 AM
38

You say that like men are only now going to be missing out. Men have already been missing out, despite women's access to abortion for the last 50 years. A change was long overdue.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 05:15 AM
1

Good for you bro, I am envious of those who are happy with less.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 05:10 AM
1

If you think it's weird then clearly you haven't seen Chadfish experiments.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 05:04 AM
1

Did she offer you sex within her first two messages to you (or within first two sentences if you met irl) ?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 05:02 AM
2

Nice dodge
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 04:51 AM
2

I care, because I care about being valued by women for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 04:44 AM
2

I don't care about being valued for the things billionaires are valued for. I do care about being valued by women for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 04:43 AM
3

Do you think Chadfish experiments are all fakes? You're in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 04:33 AM
2

Anything you do to get sex that is more than what Chad does to get sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 04:32 AM
1

You're not getting it. Both women's astronomical standards and pity fucking is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 04:29 AM
3

Why are you happy to dance for sex when Chad gets hot women approaching HIM for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 04:24 AM
2

Right, you get it, it's bad either way. The fundamental issue is female nature and that can't be changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 04:22 AM
3

Legit do not understand how the average man is happy with his life when Chadfish experiments exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 04:20 AM
2

No, but that doesn't mean there aren't consequences to women dating like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 04:17 AM
-1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 09:35 PM
-3

Rights. Abuse them, you lose them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 09:12 PM
3

Every girl is into Chads Not according to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 01:29 AM
2

This is why it's actually good for men to be shitty partners outside of sex. That way you know she's with you for the right reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 01:26 AM
1

Going out and attending parties and liking to dance and shit don’t Make you a “ party girl “ What? That's exactly what a party girl is.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 01:24 AM
2

The famed personality detector of women strikes again. https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueOffMyChest/comments/vhuqhd/guy\_ive\_been\_casually\_dating\_told\_me\_he\_is\_a/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 04:42 PM
3

If only most women had that option.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 01:45 PM
3

How far up your wife's vagina does another man's dick have to be for you to make a post like this? https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueOffMyChest/comments/vhm5fc/i\_hit\_the\_age\_where\_1821yo\_girls\_arent\_attractive/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 12:15 PM
3

Nah you wouldn't, you'd turn me down for my looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 08:13 PM
3

the sun is not fundamental to my happiness because I don't expect it to be. This is just a restating of what you said previously. Does not expecting it somehow make you not want it? If no, are you happy living without your most important wants fulfilled? You may still be miserable because there's no sun, but you're not angry at the sun I never said angry at the sun. I just said angry. You can be angry about misfortune that no person is responsible for.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 07:58 PM
0

If I never expected the sun, I'm not going to be upset it's not sunny. What does expectation have to do with it? If your happiness was somehow fundamentally dependent on the sun shining (as men's is on sex/relationships), why wouldn't you be angry if you had to live a miserable life because you could never experience the sun's shine? Why would you care whether you "deserve" it or not? Your life will be miserable either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 07:47 PM
3

No need. It's you people that need to hear it, not I.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 07:34 PM
14

Anger means you’ve been wronged What a bizarre suggestion. Where the hell did you get the idea that you can only be angry about being wronged? You can be angry about any kind of misfortune, not just injustices committed against you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 07:32 PM
3

Have you considered that women might enjoy things like anime and video games and maybe don’t give a shit about attracting a man? It's not about "attracting" a man. It's about the power and attention they get from it. I can tell you why you’re not getting laid and it’s not solely due to your looks as you claim. It is solely due to my looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 07:28 PM
15

You speak as if anger is a choice. It isn't. That is something children do and they are supposed to grow out of it. Nonsense. Most adults will get angry about plenty of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 07:24 PM
3

Yeah, but I'm not angry. I want a relationship, but I don't get angry about not having one. Ok? It seems a loud vocal minority of men take to internet forums to complain or make horrible, harmful generalizations about women. Correct, although they're not so much of a minority. If they were, we wouldn't have to hear women whine about "entitlement" constantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 07:23 PM
2

There is a breed of woman that occupies predominantly unnattractive male spaces because she enjoys the feeling of power she has over them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 07:18 PM
3

everyone Are you including women in that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 05:56 PM
3

Correct. Women aren't complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 05:28 PM
0

Wasn't an insult, just an observation. I'm still waiting You aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 05:12 PM
-4

You're playing dumb. Every girl like you knows exactly what they're doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 05:10 PM
-3

You know exactly what I mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 05:09 PM
-2

I'm pretty good looking and nerdy, the amount of guys who think we will click based on those two things is ridiculous. Oh, you're one of THOSE girls
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 05:08 PM
15

Entitlement doesn't matter. Even if you truly convinced every single man that he doesn't "deserve" sex, the amount of angry men would remain exactly the same. Because their anger isn't caused by not getting what they think they "deserve", it's caused by simply not getting what they want. The "entitlement" that men have is front-brain post-hoc rationalization so they can feel justified in their anger. That's not the actual cause of their anger. Personally I'd wish men would learn (as I have) that…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 05:00 PM
11

make fun of their ex for being small and uncircumcised. North American women's preference for mutilated penises is proof that female sexuality can (and thus, should) be recalibrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 07:46 PM
1

Its not a need. You just want it. Wants and desires are not needs. So you believe that a woman chained up in a basement and forced to breed children for 20 years is having her needs met?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 06:56 PM
2

Is there a single woman on the planet that understands what "entitlement" means? I'm not sure there is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 06:54 PM
2

Everyone else just acknowledged and got on with it. Nah, everybody else (well, most) just lies to themself and each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:34 PM
4

Being cursed with knowledge is a unique issue in our bluepilled society.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:27 PM
1

I think I’ve seen one picture on here of a man who is a solid 5. In that case he was probably more like a 6-7, given that women can't rate men accurately.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:24 PM
4

Please explain to me what leads a person to make a comment like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 02:45 AM
1

Well you started this comment chain by asking if I was joking, as though I'd said something outrageous. Even weirder, you pointed out how I still care about looks, as if that somehow affects whether I would (or should?) be able to pursue the latter group of women. What exactly was your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 06:38 PM
1

Why do you keep responding to me with a blanket statement about the apparent behaviour of all women? Some women say it's all they care about, others say they care about it a decent amount, others say they dont care about it much at all. What is your problem with me pursuing the latter group?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 05:53 PM
1

How am I deluding myself if women themselves are the ones claiming not to care about looks much? I'm not saying all or even most claim that. But a significant amount do. I dont see why I would need to not care about looks myself to date a woman who says she doesnt care about looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 02:15 PM
0

Nah that's not the same, because men don't go around claiming to be attracted to personality and not looks. Women do, so it's fine for me to care about a woman's looks whilst she doesn't care much about mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 07:39 AM
-1

Why is that an issue? If she's hot (to me) then I don't need to be attracted to her personality
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 11:23 PM
-2

Yes? I don't see why that's an issue when there are tons of women who claim they're attracted to personality and don't care much for looks. And why would I need to also be attracted to personality just because she is? Your comment makes no sense
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 11:17 PM
0

No? Why would this be a joke?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 11:09 PM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 10:53 PM
2

Correct. I have studied women's sexual selection for many years now.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 10:41 PM
-2

Why would I be joking? Do you actually have a point to make or no?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 10:39 PM
1

Yea they don't really care unless it's extreme. The percent of men who's self loathing is the reason women aren't attracted to them is less than 1%.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 10:38 PM
1

Nah if you can't even love yourself they will pick up on that and dump your ass. Nah, they don't really care about that. How can you begin to show true love when you can't even love the person you ARE. Why would one preclude the other? Completely specious nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 10:36 PM
-4

What is wrong with those standards exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 10:21 PM
6

I need to move to wherever you live that the average woman looks like that. The first 4 are above average, the last one is what average would look like if the average woman was skinny (she isn't), and the fat one is below average a little bit but she has huge tits so I'd still fuck her. Edit: Okay well the image you've changed it to is a bit closer to average, but a lot still seem to have much better shape than the average woman. Actually they're all in better shape than the average woman too so…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 10:20 PM
2

Nah not really, women don't care about that oustide of extremes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 10:15 PM
3

You are completely out of touch with what young women actually select for in 2022.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 09:35 PM
-2

Can you describe what is the bare minimum you would accept in a woman to date and potentially marry? Physically hot (to me). Cares about personality much more than looks. Very attracted to me and exhibits that with regular, enthusiastic sex. Introvert. Big boobs or big ass (doesn't have to have both).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 09:33 PM
3

Women couldn't care less about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 09:24 PM
12

doing what is the bare minimum that they should be doing anyways for themselves? Yes, which is way more than many women do who get attention regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 05:46 PM
4

You are underestimating the victim complex of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 08:13 PM
1

So it's okay to take something away from other people... I said it's rational. I don't care whether it's "okay" or not. Social validation isn't integral to a young person's happiness? These things were a proxy for social acceptance... If you meant social acceptance in general, then yes that is more comparable to lacking sexual validation than merely not going to prom or getting into a sorority. At that point it is probably varies person to person, but there would still be a sizeable portion of y…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 07:52 PM
4

I think you're overestimating how much women think about sexually unsuccessful guys and misogynists in general. Is this a joke Women literally do not shut the fuck up about "misogynists"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 07:36 PM
1

Reverse image search. If you ever share a Twitter/Insta/whatever SM link here from someone you follow, someone could go through the follower list until they see a pfp or pics with a face that resmebles the pic you shared here (this is how one person got doxxed on the server). If you ever exchange SM with other people here, even privately (as some have in the past), you're now vulnerable if they behave in a way that gets them doxxed because you could be found through their SM by again someone loo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 07:30 PM
2

"child didn't get toy they wanted, smashes their sibling's toy" Also rational, if that child is happier because of it. This is like if I got mad at movies and ads talking about prom season because I didn't go to prom. Or thought that sororities should be abolished because I tried to rush one and didn't get in. Not really, because those things are not even remotely integral to happiness as sex is to a young man's happiness. I neither went to prom nor joined a frat, and those things have zero affe…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 06:53 PM
5

He's wrong though. Doxxing is "never going to happen" until it does. Just ask the people on the Discord server lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 06:43 PM
1

I would never believe she was really into sex with me if she squirted with previous men but not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 01:24 PM
1

Idk? Maybe her ex is an douche and tells you. Maybe she's dumb enough to tell you herself (altho I'd be grateful she did, so I can know to ditch her). It was your hypothetical bro lol, idk how I would find out in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 12:09 PM
1

So no one can ever have anything someone else doesn’t have? Not everything. Lots of things are not particularly enviable and don't cause emotional distress to see other people have them when you don't. Sex isn't one of those things. Especially as a young man. Seeing women all get busy with the same Chads whilst you can't get a single woman to look your way as a young man is enraging and psychopathy inducing. Does this apply to Elon Musk’s wealth as well? Nah. Elon Musk's life isn't particularly …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 12:05 PM
3

Lol, yes. That warrants breaking up. Nightmare scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 10:13 AM
1

Nah, just the problems they created.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 09:14 PM
2

That falsely assumes that losing weight would get me dates/sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 09:05 PM
1

Because I like food, and I have no reason not to.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 08:54 PM
2

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 08:48 PM
1

World peace would befall the entire globe overnight if women became like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 08:37 PM
1

If she distributes the fat well, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 08:34 PM
6

Despite being fat, I can complain about dating problems, and I will complain about dating problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 08:16 PM
4

I can and I will.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 08:05 PM
7

Jfc. It's a miracle that men are attracted to women at all given that they're like this. Women in the 1st world in 2022 are literally the most privileged demographic in the history of humanity and somehow they manage to be this miserable and unpleasant. Something is wrong with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 07:20 PM
1

She's cute. For her age, I'd say 7.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 06:01 PM
2

Ok so four comments later do you finally understand that what's true for you is not true for most men or do you need me to explain it once more
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 05:42 PM
1

I doesn't matter whether you're getting 1st date sex offers from those particular women or not. If you're getting it from a decent number of other women, then you don't need those specific women to prove their attraction to you; you already know you're attractive based on other women's treatment of you. This is not the norm for most men. Most men aren't getting that treatment from any women, so the bar for proof of attraction is higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 05:36 PM
0

If you're an attractive dude then you're in the minority of men who isn't made to wait for sex, and are abstaining of your own will. That's not most men though. Most men have to wait for sex regardless of whether they want to or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 05:10 PM
1

Making someone wait for sex isn't about attraction. Yes it is. I guess it's just one big coincidence that the men that typically aren't made to wait for sex just so happen to be hot men who easily get women?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 04:57 PM
3

The men who already get that treatment from women are the ones who you don't need to treat like that actually, since they already know they're attractive. It's the men who don't get that treatment from women (ie most men) who shouldn't believe a woman is attracted to them unless she gives him that treatment. Unfortuantely most men are bluepilled or desperate or both and won't hold this standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 04:15 PM
5

Jfc that sub is a trip. This is why only casual sex counts. No man should ever commit to a woman that doesn't fuck him quickly. If he's desperate, then at most he should continue seeing her for an eventual crumb of sex, but she should never be more than a temporary gf whilst he looks for a woman that actually finds him attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 03:54 PM
33

A man being unsuccessful in the dating market does not mean society is rejecting him. Actually it does. Not only is sexual rejection a big component of societal rejection, it also quickly turns into social rejection and even professional rejection if the man dares to oppose the societal gaslighting that his sexual failings are entirely his own choice and nobody else's.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 02:14 PM
17

Not the same, there's zero validation in seeing an escort.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 02:05 PM
0

I didn't compare their severity, I compared their factual incorrectness.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 01:50 PM
3

unpopular males are so emotional and entitled they need to spread their misery to others. Yes, and it's also rational. If other people have something you can't, then it's best to prevent them from having it also, so that you are not caused envy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 01:41 PM
-1

Where did I say they were equal? Two things can share similarities whilst being wildly different in other ways. In this case, they share the similarity of being factually incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 01:29 PM
1

Society also used to think black people were subhuman. Society isn't always right.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 01:23 PM
1

Do you know what pedophilia is
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 01:17 PM
3

You are not free to demand others accept this as normal and healthy and they can call you any name they want. Just as they're free to do the same to gay people or black people etc. Doesn't mean they're right. "I challenge you to disprove X." "I'm allowed to say X isn't true." This isn't an argument against X being true. We aren't debating whether you're allowed to believe and say it's gross and creepy, we're debating whether it's gross and creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 01:13 PM
3

That's pretty good.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 08:31 PM
2

The idea that a woman is with me more because I "get" her or she finds me funny than because she wants to fuck me is utterly disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 08:24 PM
11

Absolutely. The risk of getting sodomized/stalked/sex trafficked is utterly microscopic for women in the west, and I don't care about harassment. Very easy choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 08:21 PM
3

By 2030 men will be shamed for being attracted to women under 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 07:17 PM
1

Ok tbf if I met a girl who shared my fetishes/kinks then I would probably date her even if she looked like her. Although I suspect she puts a lot of effort into sex with this guy because he mogs her so hard. I doubt I would get the same treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 06:52 PM
1

If she had a shapely body, probably. Those teeth are hard to look at though. And braces are usually at least +1 smv to me. At least they'll probably look better in the future since she has them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 06:26 PM
-1

She's skinny and white. Her issues are having an ugly mousey face and having a shapeless body (no ass/tits/waist).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 05:59 PM
3

I care, because other men having low standards makes it harder to compete against them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 05:59 PM
7

Actually, women are the ones who rate men inaccurately.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 05:50 PM
4

I actually agree, although people often mischaracterize it as "only wanting hot women". Not wanting ugly women =/= only wanting hot women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 05:47 PM
8

I have a 6'4 handsome faced coworker who is dating (and now living with) a fucking 4/10. I don't even think I would date her and I'm an incel. Why are normie men's standards so low? It is a race to the bottom if you are a man in the smp.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 05:35 PM
2

Jfc. I can't believe how low men's standards are. Normie men will accept anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 05:31 PM
1

Honestly, none. Female sexuality is gravely out of date.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 12:45 AM
0

Not to vaginas.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 12:41 AM
5

Any man who can, isn't average.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 09:50 PM
4

Who said anything about incels? That's irrelevant. The AVERAGE man cannot "play the field" with average women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 09:46 PM
4

The average dude can play the field with average looking girls No, he can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 09:35 PM
3

The former thing does not lead to the latter thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 09:04 PM
1

"Just be yourself" is typical solipsistic advice from women. "Just be yourself" is about making sure you're selecting the right person once you're already getting interest. It makes sense from that standpoint; you don't want to select someone who likes the charade you're performing because you'll have to keep that up to retain their interest, which isn't sustainable long-term for most people and is also probably just horrible to be living a lie. "Just be yourself" won't get you interest if you'r…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 09:02 PM
4

I'm not sure how this is a response to my comment, but I'll answer your question anyway. No, I neither want to attract women with money nor want women to be attracted to money.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 08:33 PM
1

I hope internet memes are not the basis of your understanding of human psychology.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 08:22 PM
3

That's smart. However there are a lot less wealthy women than wealthy men (for example there's about 2 men for every 1 woman earning six figures). So, statistically speaking about half of those men would have to date women with less wealth than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 08:08 PM
3

If you can use that to get a higher value partner. Wouldn't you? No. I have zero desire to date glorified whores, and if I just wanted sex with a whore then I would simply use my wealth to pay for one.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 08:04 PM
2

You don't know what men desire, then. Most men absolutely care whether or not a woman they're dating is sexually attracted to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 08:01 PM
7

Do you have a good character ? Are you a person who cares about others ? Who's trying to improve himself ? You could not have listed anything more irrelevant to women's attraction. but if I had I would shower my gf with gifts, I wouldn't be insecure abt whether or not she's with me jUsT fOr The MoNEy Because you are female and thus enjoy the privilege of being attractive by mere virtue of existing with a vagina. Most men are not privileged in this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 07:55 PM
4

Wealthy men should obfuscate their wealth in the early months of seeing a girl to ensure she is with him for the right reasons. True or false?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 07:47 PM
1

Terrible idea, that's where these women congregate the most, and I don't trust my self-control enough to put myself in such an environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 05:47 PM
1

Summer is immensely torturous. Every time I leave the house I see girls in short skirts/pants and exposed midriffs everywhere I look. Some girl's legs are so mouthwateringly smooth and shapely that it should be illegal for them to be exposed in public.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 05:08 PM
8

They already do. Women short shaming men is already at least 10 times more common than men fat shaming women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 05:04 PM
1

you cant be an asshole and ugly and expect people to like you FTFY.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 03:58 PM
1

So you think it's legal in most of the first world for adult men to have sex with "children"?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 09:20 AM
0

Nope, that's absurd. If you think that then you think it's legal in most of the first world for adult men to have sex with "really young girls", which is obviously an absurd assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 09:19 AM
2

No, in most of the first world, 16 (or even younger) is the age of consent period. As in, it is legal for 80 year old men to have sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:29 PM
-9

really young girls She's 16. That's not "really young girls". That's even legal in most of the first world.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 09:00 AM
0

I just looked up her stream and she comes across more like a 9 year old than a 16 year old. In which case I think the appeal is more in line with the appeal of Japanese idols rather than dudes just being pervs. I mean perhaps that is also just dudes being pervs but that's a far more disordered and abnormal form of perversion.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 12:36 AM
8

No, people are not doing what they want, and by that I mean an enormous portion of young men are not having sex. That's a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:41 PM
1

Is it the pedophile's fault that he's attracted to children? No. Yet people will hate him regardless, even if he never acts on it. It's normal to hate people on the basis of their nature, even if they can't control it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:45 PM
2

If you're talking only about casual sex I am, since that's what matters most. Look around you at people who are actually IN relationships. Are they all Chads? Who women choose when their options are limited is not a great barometer of who they are and aren't sexually attracted to. Casual sex is the barometer of that because that's where women have the most choice. And specifically who HOT women choose for casual sex is the greatest barometer since those women have the most choice, thus their sel…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:15 PM
4

No it's very simple, nor is it an assumption. It's simple deduction on the basis of what traits correlate most with sexual success with women (hint: it's looks).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:58 PM
3

Lol, you are just proving my point even further. If you put Tom Holland's face up against a yearbook of college aged men, he would absolutely mog the significant majority of them in those traits I mentioned. You simply do not have a good sense of the distribution of male attractiveness if you think otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:32 PM
3

His brows, eyes, skin and lips are completely normal, and also not anywhere near as important as the traits I mentioned. His only actual bad trait is his height, but again that is only tolerated because he is above average in the other traits that actually matter. Those traits being jaw, cheekbones, facial thirds, facial symmetry, hairline.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:22 PM
10

Women aren’t going around with a ruler to measure how shape their jawline is or how balance their facial features are. They don't need to, their eyes have been calibrated by thousands of years of evolution to evaluate those things within seconds of seeing a man's face.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:17 PM
10

In my opinion Tom Holland is incredibly average looking Lmao. I rest my case.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:14 PM
8

Getting sex occasionally ≠ being able to maintain a long term relationship I don't care who can maintain a long term relationship. I care who gets women's pussies wet. Go on the last thread about attractive men. Everyone gave varying answers. Women are terrible at understanding what are the traits that attract them. They have very little self awareness. Are Timothee Chalamet or Tom Holland what you would consider a “chad” ? YES. They are Chad in the exact same way in all the ways that matter. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:49 PM
7

No actually hot socially awkward shut ins can still get sex off Tinder. Most women will not find the same men attractive Wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:31 PM
15

it's hard for me to believe that so many men are just that unattractive or weird because if that was the case then nobody would have any positive interaction First of all, being "weird" has nothing to do with who women want to fuck. Weird men who are hot easily get sex. Normal men who aren't hot don't easily get sex. Hotness is what makes a man get sex, and not much else matters beyond that. For every Behavior a man may do, if it's creepy to one woman then there's a good chance another woman wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:10 PM
1

Thank you for your sanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:45 PM
10

It's not confusing at all and it's actually very simple. Women are just invested in lying about how their attraction works, unlike men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:40 PM
35

How bad will it have to get before women admit this is a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:27 PM
2

Ok, it's clear you don't even have your own argument figured out, since you started this comment saying it doesn't need defending and then immediately offered a defense of it. Only if you don't believe in right or wrong does an exertion of power upon someone not require moral justification.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 05:13 PM
5

There is no defense of cancel culture that isn't a psychopathic championing of mob (in)justice.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 05:06 PM
3

I think it's a fair assumption. Then you're just wrong. And hypocrites are on my list of people I'm not going to fight for. They can fend for themselves. So you admit you don't have a defense of cancel culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 05:01 PM
2

For starters that's a completely baseless assumption. But even if that assumption was true, that would simply make them hypocrites, not incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 04:54 PM
3

Correct, people did bad things in the past. That is not a justification for people continuing to do bad things.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 04:27 PM
7

Yea, consequences that shouldn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 03:52 PM
1

They are literally not answers. "Wanting X is a red flag" is not an answer to "when should a guy expect X?".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 07:13 PM
7

If he were interested in dating her, he would push for exclusivity. This is just false. You said yourself in another comment that you'd even be exclusive with a guy you liked less just because he pushed for it, so that's already a reason why a guy wouldn't be the one to push for exclusivity, even if he wants it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:49 PM
6

Never, he's not interested in dating her so why would he care if she's seeing other people Who said he's not interested in dating her? I just said he's not going to push for exclusivity himself. It would be in her worst interest to keep entertaining that man. Her interests aren't relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:41 PM
4

I don't know why you keep only talking about the case where he pushes for exclusivity. So, suppose he doesn't push for exclusivity. After how many dates would it be in his best interest to expect her to stop seeing other men?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:35 PM
3

Because he understands he's only human and he probably is on par with many many many men, and an even worse option than many more. I don't know why you'd even bother with relationships if you believed that "many many many" other people were just as good of an option to your partner as you and that "many more" were an even better option to them than you. It's an unrealistic expectation to think any person would value that much after just 1 date. How many dates does it take you to figure out you h…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:27 PM
6

It's a red flag to prefer someone commit on the first date into of just dating them. It makes it easier to love bomb and control her. How does any of this answer the question of how he should guage her interest?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:55 PM
2

Why are you replying these comments to mine? They are not answers to the question I asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:44 PM
26

I'm shocked by the number of people here who've already expressed the sentiment "everybody multi-dates". That has certainly not been what I've observed anecdotally. The majority of people I've known well enough to know their dating lives, dated one person at a time. This must be a cultural difference between the UK and the US because it is not my sense here in the UK that multi-dating is the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:39 PM
12

Are you saying you are meeting women who express they don't understand? I see women express it on social media a lot. The tweet I linked in the OP is the kind of sentiment I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:29 PM
2

Saying she can't "multi-date" is the definition of pushing for exclusivity. Can you read? I didn't ask when should he say she can't multi-date or push for exclusivity. I asked about how her continuing to multi-date should affect how he gauges her interest in him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:20 PM
2

So to have a few dates How many is "a few"? Coz if it's 2 or 3 then you basically agree with me, just that one date is too harsh.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:17 PM
2

Now if we had sex and she was still multi-dating And how many dates do you normally wait before having sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:13 PM
14

Why are you assuming women don't understand it Because I constantly see sentiments like the one in the tweet I linked expressed on social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:09 PM
37

Do you think women like the opposite situation? If they don't, why do they have such a hard time understanding why men don't like it?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:07 PM
1

The number of dates depends on the individuals. You should ask for what you want when you want it. That wasn't what I asked. I'm not asking when should he ask for exclusivity, I'm asking about how her continuing to multi-date should affect how he gauges her interest in him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:05 PM
8

That's not an answer to the question I asked. I'm not asking when should he "push for exclusivity", I'm asking about how her continuing to multi-date should affect how he gauges her interest in him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:05 PM
-1

It is not good practice to put all your eggs in one basket. It's not good for men to be with women who won't put all her eggs in his basket. it is normal Normal =/= good. One date? Ok, so after how many dates whilst she is multi-dating should a guy decide that she's just not that into him?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:49 PM
1

Not my problem. Not any woman’s problem. Unless you’re saying you think women are obligated to fuck a man just because he wants it. Are women obligated to get commitment from a man just because they want it? I don't know, nor do I care since it has less than zero relevance to this particular disagreement. you mean all women doing it to that individual man. Correct! I didn't intend to imply otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 07:09 PM
3

moving on to a woman who will let you bang right away? Most men dont have that option. The complaint men have about women withholding sex isn't about one woman doing it, it's about all women doing it, and women doing it to some men and not others.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 05:16 PM
5

I replied this to someone else below but it's relevant to this too; I got someone on the server to query the data and it seems that the sample is enormously biased toward the older demographics. 1,120 of the responses were over 50, 898 were 23-50 and 57 were 18-22 (and I assume the 114 leftover were didn't respond). So that chart I posted made by the person who originally posted the data here is actually a bit inaccurate but not by much.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 12:00 PM
4

I got someone on the server to query the data and it seems that the sample is enormously biased toward the older demographics. 1,120 of the responses were over 50, 898 were 23-50 and 57 were 18-22 (and I assume the 114 leftover were didn't respond). So that chart I posted made by the person who originally posted the data here is actually a bit inaccurate but not by much. And for the 2018 data, 88 people ages 18-22 responded, which isn't much better than 57.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 11:50 AM
8

That's the only one where women are having less sex than men. Which was the point of your post I thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 09:01 AM
4

Not sure. But I agree it would seem weird if the sample size of the 2018 data was drastically larger. Maybe it's normal for general trends to be learned from a sample size like that, I really don't know, but it seems small to me. If the sample size of the previous surveys are equally small though then I would say it's equally useless, and it'd shock me given how many credible sites wrote about "the rising sexlessness" of young people/men around 2019.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 08:12 AM
21

Look at the bits I underlined in red. They only sampled 23 men and 30 women in the age range of 18-22.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 08:01 AM
107

Actually someone did post them in the daily chat thread. Here's why the results are so anomalous. edit: to make it clear; they only sampled 23 men and 30 women in the age range of 18-22. edit2: it should be noted that I just got someone to check the 2018 GSS data, and only 88 people ages 18-22 (male and female combined) were surveyed then, which doesn't seem much better to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 07:47 AM
-1

7 inches of dick (bonepressed).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 11:26 AM
1

Did he have no porn problem prior to you marrying him?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 11:24 AM
3

I'm unfortunately an average man I'm 5'4"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 04:00 PM
5

''attractive'' varies radically from person to person No it doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 12:39 PM
1

The latter are physically attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 08:23 PM
2

Recreate this with me pls bb https://i.imgur.com/PkPSTzT.mp4
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 11:18 AM
2

How many men's skulls have you obliterated with those thighs
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 10:59 AM
2

PPD Discord men > PPD subreddit men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 03:04 AM
0

Women aren't complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 02:18 AM
0

I'm a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 02:16 AM
-1

We are not children. Wrong. we are not a monolith Wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 05:51 PM
7

PSA: The only problem women in the first world face is their own hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 05:46 PM
1

Quality over quantity for women is exactly what that excerpt asserts.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 11:24 AM
1

yes
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 09:03 PM
4

Bateman's principle. A single male can easily fertilize all of a female's eggs; she will not produce more offspring by mating with more than one male. A male is capable of fathering more offspring if he mates with several females. By and large, a male's potential reproductive success is limited by the number of females he mates with, whereas a female's potential reproductive success is limited by how many eggs she can produce. According to Bateman's principle, this results in sexual selection, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 08:54 PM
3

no woman I dated has ever voiced concerns about body counts. Is it really so unobvious to people why men find promiscuity unattractive whilst women don't care? For the vast majority of human history, men could not know whether a kid is actually theirs or not unless the mother didn't have sex with any other man. Men evolved an aversion to promiscuious women because the men that had no aversion ended up unknowingly raising other men's children instead of their own, thus their genes were bred out o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 12:18 AM
1

It's the only reasonable explanation. I came to the same conclusion myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:59 PM
3

It definitely feels like it, which is why I mostly watch lesbian/solo porn, and when I do watch guy-girl porn, it has to be POV and something nasty like ATOGM so I know she's only doing it for the cash. I once saw an amatuer porn vid (ie documentary of Chad's life) of four women giving one guy a fourway blowjob and it made me so angry my boner died and I took to Reddit/Discord to insult women for like an hour.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:58 PM
1

I've made plenty of cringe comments too but I wasn't really myself when I made those, so they aren't really me. Only the funny ones are the real me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:52 PM
5

Porn is literally a documentary of Chad's life.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:31 PM
5

Narc trait: reading over comments/messages you sent months/years ago and making yourself laugh with your own comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:27 PM
1

I very rarely see well matched couples. We must be living on different planets.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:24 PM
8

But, being attracted and lusting for you is quite different. Are they? If a woman is not lusting for a man, I would not say she is attracted to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:22 PM
12

Wife literally went AWOOGA at her tits Bruh what tits, she barely has any
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:20 PM
0

Science needs to be working on cloning Scarlett Johansson (which nowadays is arguably not so dissimilar from cloning a dinosaur but she's still hot). I am happy for them to skip on cloning the brain if it makes things easier for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:14 PM
2

I don't understand why this comment is a response to mine. The 'equation' I'm referring to is what makes a man good looking, since that is what your comment was about. Not overall attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:03 PM
5

This is just complete nonsense. Men's attractiveness distribution is on an exponential curve because women are so selective, but that doesn't mean it's binary.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:00 PM
5

It just doesn't matter. You have to have an Elliot Roger tier personality to not get sex from any woman. Personality is not the issue for 99% of men. Whether a man gets sex or not and more importantly the hotness of women he gets sex with, is determined mostly by how he looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 10:56 PM
2

They don’t actually hate that women are attracted to good looking men - they want to be the good looking men. How a man actually looks is only half the equation. The other half is women's criteria for what qualifies a man as good looking (which qualifies a very narrow slice of the male population). That is what men are mad about.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 10:45 PM
–

What they're saying is that women have higher standards for looks than men. That guy doesn't care about personality, but that doesn't mean his standards for looks are as high as women's.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 10:35 PM
–

Most men* Chad can get casual sex without having to trade money/commitment/companionship for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 09:44 PM
–

Looked better before. She's going down the Natalie Portman/Alison Brie/Jessica Alba path of turning into a gaunt skeleton with age.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 09:31 PM
–

Wat? Men aren't too short/ugly to provide for women, they're too short/ugly to get sex from women WITHOUT having to provide for them. That's what men are mad about.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 09:21 PM
–

Women: oh yeah, we see total hotties paired up with subpar lumps of men all the time, women are so much less shallow than men are! This is by far the most deranged sentiment I see expressed on this sub. These people have watched too many movies.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 07:00 PM
–

That sounds like a dream life. For women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 06:55 PM
–

PSA: You do not qualify as a sexhaving male until you are on the recieving end of something akin to this; https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueOffMyChest/comments/tdpuxp/i_hooked_up_with_a_guy_from_reddit/
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 03:53 PM
2

Where do you live where men are the ones who want commitment and women are the ones who just want sex? I would like to move there.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 03:48 PM
0

Math isn't your strong suit, is it
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 05:36 AM
1

Given that there is about 1 woman for every 1 man in our largely monogamous society, how would it be mathematically possible for women to be dating down in looks at a significantly greater rate than men are?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 04:49 AM
2

No, you don't. It's literally not mathematically possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 02:07 AM
3

No you don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 08:23 PM
6

I wouldn't be so sure. Some of the women complaining about being pumped and dumped by him were absolute munters.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 12:56 PM
17

You have no idea what the average man looks like, then.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 12:54 PM
28

Women calling this 6'4 man 'average' really exemplifies the only real problem with modern dating; women's completely out of whack standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 10:13 AM
3

Pornhub.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:56 AM
1

most women want someone in their looks league Not percentile-wise. This is evidenced by the fact that male partner count has greater variance than female partner count; ie there is a degree of sharing of top men occurring, which mathematically can only possible if there are women fucking men in a higher percentile of attractiveness than themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:16 PM
1

Well, whether you agree or disagree with this post, at least we can put to bed the idea that anything matters more than looks. ...right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:13 PM
1

A fat woman can easily get sex if she lowers her standards enough but a fat man will very rarely get the same success in dating as a fat woman and he has to make up for it really really hard with his personality Because any kind of unattractive woman (not just fat women) can get sex easier than their male counterpart. I actually think fatness is less of a determinant of male smv than it is of female smv. Fat man/skinny woman couples are almost always higher smv than skinny man/fat woman couples.…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 06:41 PM
32

If a guy isn't getting casual sex, then he isn't attractive to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 03:02 PM
122

The fact that wanting to be attractive to women is analogous to wanting to live a billionaire's lifestyle is precisely the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 01:44 PM
–

his penis size will be the last thing on my mind Just what every guy wants to hear!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 05:48 AM
1

To answer your questions in order; Women's sexual selectivity is too high for most people to be able to enjoy mutual sexual attraction. There is no solution, now that the cat is out of the bag, so-to-speak. There is no solution to that either. That all women on Tinder seem to be paty thots. Why are there no nerdy girls on Tinder?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 05:36 AM
7

Bruh wat. ScarJo's body in the MCU films is sexy as fuck. Especially in Iron Man 2. Watch this and if you still hold the belief that her body isn't nice, I will simply have to hold the opinion that you are gay!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 05:30 AM
-1

Eva Lovia is positively mouthwatering. I would end up in jail if I crossed paths with her IRL.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 05:12 AM
15

The 'sex' in that phrase refers to no-strings-attached sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 07:23 AM
1

If you can't see the similarity between the two things even after reading my post explaining it then you lack empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 01:17 AM
1

It's reality that's a cunt, then. Don't shoot the messenger.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 08:11 PM
1

Swans are NOT cunts. Glad we cleared that up. Have a good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 01:39 AM
2

You aren't creeped out by centuries old carcasses?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 01:10 AM
24

I'm 5'2 You shouldn't be breeding at all. Short women are incel factories.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:53 PM
27

Leonardo Da Vinci's gotta be like 500 years old by now. I think it's fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:48 PM
–

If you don't believe looks are the majority determinant of SMV for both sexes, you are not living in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:06 AM
1

Based on that pic of FDS posters that was posted here during purge a while back, most of them will not be able to get commitment of a man they're physically attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 11:14 PM
2

How can psychology evolve? Same as any other trait. Random variation that gets naturally/sexually selected for or against.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 09:45 PM
3

They'll be on FDS in 10 years
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 02:40 PM
4

I’d be happy with just having one who genuinely loves me. That is the sense that men "prefer" monogamy. They prefer it over getting nothing at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 12:07 PM
3

Or would it be a sort of 'main partner' with affairs on the side permitted arrangement? Having a main bisexual woman who I explore other women with seems like the ideal to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 12:06 PM
2

My nipples come through even with two sports bras on "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence." - Christopher Hitchens. In other words; show bobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 11:58 AM
1

I haven't dated any woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 11:49 AM
0

There is absolutely nothing sexy or hot about her.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 08:22 AM
1

No. Below average women have to live a world of self delusion in order to deal with the fact that the only men available to them for commitment is below average men. They don't actually think those men are hot. A below average women calling you hot is proof of nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/21 01:50 PM
2

Because the relative cost of a hooker is a lot less as a percentage of your earnings the richer you get. I hate the idea of having to pay a hooker for sex, but if it only cost me $10 to get a hot one, I'd pay that because that's still much better than nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/21 01:46 PM
1

I didn't reply to your post, I replied to your comment, where you said "average", not "below average".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/21 12:22 PM
1

Read your own comment again. You said average men, not below average.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/21 11:59 AM
1

And I think you’re overestimating how “average” average men really look. Do you understand what average means
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/21 11:39 AM
3

Because that just seems to me like standard online-approaching. So you agree with the post then. Simping is the only mode of dating available to average men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 10:30 AM
2

And women can also absolutely continue to not give a single fuck that this is what men want and keep on living their best lives. Perhaps this needs to be reconsidered.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 09:18 PM
1

I have two questions: Do you watch Succession If so, how do I get a gf as thicc as Shiv Roy. I start salivating every time there's a full-body shot of her on screen. I need her thiccness in my hands. I need to press my face into the warmth of her asscrack. I need to know what her butthole tastes like. Please give me detailed step-by-step instructions on how to acquire this, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 09:03 PM
1

Because they're ugly, and ugliness is prohibitive of sexual attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 04:26 PM
4

I need to move to whatever country your friend lives in.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 01:17 AM
8

Introverted women are probably a much lower cheat risk so I'd prefer an introverted woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 01:11 AM
2

I started eating healthier ~2.5-3 months ago Why the hell would you do that?! The Pringle-only diet was clearly doing wonders for your booty.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 01:09 AM
1

Hot body 5. Any man who says otherwise is a pedophile.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 10:02 PM
0

Marriage and kids with someone you're not attracted to is NOT the apex of what people want to achieve romantically. I'd consider romantic sucess as; a sexual relationship between two people who feel sexual attraction and infatuation for each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 09:58 PM
2

A happy romantic relationship is romantic success. But that's not what ugly people who're married with children have.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 05:32 PM
1

Correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 04:48 PM
0

Ugly people end up with other ugly people. Correct. who love them. Incorrect. And that first one is probably also going to become incorrect in the future as Gen-Z women get older, since they seem to prefer to be alone over having their looksmatch.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 04:35 PM
1

Because the men she's attracted to don't want her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 02:54 PM
-2

why would women not want to stay with someone who they're attracted to long-term? Companionship, stability, environment to raise a family, societal pressure, fear of loneliness.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 02:41 PM
3

how do people with disfiguring injuries/conditions end up romantically successful? They don't. Those people end up with similarly unattractive people or people who don't care about sex. That's not romantic success.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 11:09 AM
2

I would say the devs giving the bot the gift of life is a pretty big perk. After all, they are creating her for you. If you were not paying for it, they would be creating another bot with a different consciousness and attractors. Or no bot at all if there was no market for it... Yea that's all fine with me so long as she feels lust for me. Because that's how programming works? If you program X your going to get X. If Y spontaneously developed that's free will that goes against the programing. I …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 08:26 PM
2

So it's okay if you pay the pimp directly, because then the prostitute isn't getting anything out of having sex with you? Except she would be getting something out of having sex with me; money from her pimp. Even a sex slave would be getting something out of having sex with me, which would be avoiding punishment. If she's having sex with me for any other reason than to fulfill her own sexual desires, then I'm not interested. A robowoman could be programmed to have sexual desires thought, and tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 07:54 PM
3

A) you had to offer a big upfront payment for it to begin with That's only an issue to me if it serves as an ulterior motive for her to be having sex with me. Since I wouldn't be paying her, it's not an ulterior motive. B) the programing itself would qualify as ulterior motives. She doesn't like you for you, she likes you to please the engineers who programed her to like you who knew they could make profit from a convincing enough model. I don't believe she would be doing it to please her engine…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 07:32 PM
8

But if a real woman said she found your particular set of traits genuinely attractive, would you believe her? Not if she merely said that, because I know how similar women are to one another and that there are motives for why a woman would say those things to me even if they aren't true. There is a certain level of behavior from a woman that would make me to believe she found me attractive though, which would be lots of enthusiastic casual sex for which I offer little in return other than the se…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 06:29 PM
7

In the back of your mind you would know if you did not program to prefer a certain set of traits, she would be like any other woman. Which is no different than if I found a biowoman with a sexuality who found my particular set of traits attractive simply due to the natural random variance in human sexuality. The only distinction is that one occurs due to "natural" causes (random variance) whilst the other is due to "unnatural" causes (engineering). Of course, that's still not the same as being v…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 06:07 PM
9

It's not the same as prostitution. A prostitute doesn't find you attractive, whereas a sexbot could actually have a consciousness that is programmed to find your particular traits attractive. Of course, that's still not quite the same as having a bio woman select you, but it's a hell of a lot better than prostitution. Then, when you compare the pros and cons of a bio woman vs a robot woman, the 'natural' component of the bio woman may not be enough to win out over the robot woman, which presumab…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 04:50 PM
1

Given the slang you're using I'm going to assume you're British, like I. Are you aware that the age of consent in our country is 16? Are you of the belief that pedophillic sexual activity is legal in the UK?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 04:40 PM
0

My friends would be as honest about it as I am, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 02:57 PM
-1

You are totally living in an imaginary world of your own making if you think most men won't find a sexually developed female body attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 02:31 PM
-1

Thats ephebophile territory. Yea and that's not a disorder. That's normal male sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 02:13 PM
-2

How is it trolling?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 01:07 PM
2

I think some of you use this sub as a place to journal the most incorrect statements you can possibly conceive of using the English language.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 01:07 AM
-2

Kendall Jenner is as flat as a board. No thank you!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 12:21 AM
16

Considering most women’s standards are “treat me right and give a fuck” Serious question; why bother typing this out? It's not possible that you actually believe this. You legitimately could not have composed a more counterfactual statement if you tried.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 12:21 AM
0

You are so utterly deluded about your own nature it really is incredible to witness.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 12:14 AM
0

Are you honestly so deluded and out of touch with reality to think that is the reason women don't want us?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 11:29 PM
1

Some of the time, yea.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 02:44 PM
-2

Regular dicks are a lot more versatile. Yea but so what? I'd much rather a woman found my penis to be cumbersomely large. I'd want it to be almost too much for her to handle.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 01:37 PM
18

I probably would, and that's exactly why I wouldn't turn around and be like "but I now appreciate the PrAcTiCaLiTy of my current girlfriend's averageness".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 12:16 PM
1

Wdym ?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 12:08 PM
6

Jfc I hope this is bait
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 12:00 PM
4

Because those women were literally talking about non-sexual things No. Women's asses and tits are inherently sexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 11:09 PM
7

The would be professional suicide in my industry. Besides I don't think I'd be able to talk to them without fumbling my words. I cannot even describe how mouthwatering one of them was. There is no inch of her body that I wouldn't happily explore with my mouth, no orifice I wouldn't happily penetrate with my tongue, no fluid her body could secrete that I wouldn't happily drink from plentifully.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 11:05 PM
3

If you saw her body, you'd understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 10:59 PM
2

Wait, how does it capture how men suck? :(
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 10:52 PM
6

Tan lines are hot to me too and my theory about this is that it makes those regions of a woman appear more private, since if they're untanned then it must be because they've remained clothed, and then thus the fact that you're seeing them feels more special.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 10:22 PM
7

I have a question for you people; what is wrong with women? At my work today there was a small group of notably hot early-20s women in the office, and they literally would not shut the fuck up about their various body parts. They seemed to have some sort of compulsion to make reference to their ass or their tits or their underwear at least once every couple of minutes. These were exactly the kind of women that post on social media about sexual harassment and men being creeps blah blah blah. Yet …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 10:19 PM
1

Congrats on joining Reddit and officially relinquishing your normie status.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 09:02 PM
1

I don't think it's women's responsibility to deal with that. Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 08:57 PM
–

Can the cretins of PPD give me their thoughts on this tweet: https://twitter.com/holy_schnitt/status/1446982080425037826 Does your own anecdotal observation align with that ?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 09:43 PM
30

Are you somehow blind to all the men who want girlfriends but can't get them? If a woman wants commitment, she can get it. She just can't get it from who she wants it from. The fact that women all want commitment from the same small portion of men is literally precisely WHY that portion of men is able to get sex despite being non-committal.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 09:26 PM
19

Uh no, women remain single because they can't find a commitment oriented guy that they want commitment from. Every single woman —every single one— can get commitment from their looksmatch if they want it. They just don't want it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 09:07 PM
3

Should I also ask lottery winners how to get rich
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 04:43 PM
-1

Pure delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 11:55 AM
3

Oh. Someone's mad at us for being awesome lucky. Shit. FTFY.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 11:49 AM
2

Are you not cognizant of the fact that your experience of a human life has been extremely nerfed? Why are you happy to have lived a shit life
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 12:36 AM
0

LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 11:42 PM
2

You're probably asexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 11:41 PM
1

For a moment I thought you meant they've figured out how to grow the human body artificially and I got real excited
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 10:07 PM
5

Why do women have this fetish for pretending they have almost no standards? "I'd count myself lucky to find a guy who showers and wipes his ass among the gigachad 0.001% of men that I absolutely refuse to date outside of the bar is literally on the floor!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 07:50 PM
25

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 07:39 PM
31

Women aren't picky. Young attractive women aren't picky. This is so unbelievably out of touch. You are simply not paying attention to reality if you think this is the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 06:12 PM
2

What would you describe as "better" in this context? Better would be more sexual enthusiasm/adventurousness, demand less of me provisionally (less/cheaper gifts, cheaper dates etc), more submissive to me. Probably a bunch of other things I can't think of right now. Also are you willing to treat her better than you used to treat your exes? I'd treat her as well as her value to me warrants. If I valued an ex more, then I wouldn't treat her as well as that ex. If I valued her more, I'd treat her be…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 02:56 PM
1

Fine, but unless you're only interested in semantic debates, it's worthwhile for you to understand the meaning that someone is trying to convey by using a particular word so that you may debate them in a meaningful manner.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 02:53 PM
0

I'm sorry you're incapable of comprehending that words can have more than one meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 02:42 PM
1

That's the normie definition, not the definition used in red pill spaces. This is the definition used in red pill spaces (from the PPD glossary); The official definition is to marry above your station/social class, but the RP concept mainly refers to women seeking men that are "better than they are". That is likely to mean station/class but could also mean education level, social standing, other sources of prestige or status more generally.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 02:18 PM
4

Yea. Ideally I'd get even better treatment than what her exes got.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 02:11 PM
1

Just realized I typed it out incorrectly. I meant to say that there's about 1.83 women having sex for every 1 man having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 02:08 PM
4

Neither are good options so it's hard to say which is preferable. #1 isn't good because I'm still not being treated well, even if she also didn't treat previous men well. #2 isn't good because even if I'm being treated well, the fact that she treated previous men better means she values those previous men more than me. Ideally, she would treat me well and better than she treated previous men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 02:02 PM
3

Big mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 01:47 PM
2

We're using 'hypergamy' differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 01:41 PM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 01:20 PM
1

If there are fewer men who are attractive to women than there are women who are attracted to them, then women have two options; share the men, or go without. In a monogamous society, a large portion of women are going to choose the latter. If we lived in a society where monogamy wasn't the predominant form of mating, you'd see hypergamy manifest as women sharing the smaller % of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 12:10 PM
2

Nope, they’re not choosing men at all. Yea, that's how hypergamy manifests in a monogamous society.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 12:04 PM
5

More female sexual freedom = less equal distribution of sex among men. It's as simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 12:01 PM
3

they’re not choosing most men. Correct, hypergamy is the reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 11:53 AM
2

53% of women were not sexually active in that study, and 66% of men. Yea, but UK universities are 57% female. Which means that there's about 1.83 women having sex for every 1 man having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 11:51 AM
3

You can be ugly... Women will look past all that. No, they won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 11:37 AM
2

Why would we admit something that isn't true?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 11:36 AM
4

Female nature isn't becoming more hypergamous, but women are becoming increasingly free to express their sexuality (which is hypergamous) in it's truest form. At this point, the faster it increases, the better. I'm an accelerationist on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 09:33 PM
2

It's ability to be expressed is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 09:27 PM
2

Never done an IQ test but mine is probably around 140.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 08:42 PM
4

Can we have a purge-like event where only people with IQs above 80 are allowed to post? I have no idea how you'd enforce that but this sub sorely needs it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 05:52 PM
-1

Yes it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 05:49 PM
26

If its purely a hookup of course looks matter the most There are hordes of delusional women on here who will claim the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 05:42 PM
4

you still need to have a decent personality too. Actually, you don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 05:21 PM
1

women - even young women - are not all that picky about the men they fuck and date. Utterly deranged, demented, and completely out of touch comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 01:48 PM
0

Why can't all women be like you
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 12:19 AM
0

I do
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 11:27 PM
14

Gay son. Who the fuck wouldn't be gay if they could choose? What a peaceful life it must be to live without attraction to women. God I wish I was gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 11:25 PM
3

MJ from the first Spiderman movie needs to put her fat breasts in my mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 10:04 PM
2

Or do you have a better explanation? Yep. It's called hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 09:20 PM
3

That's right.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 09:02 PM
3

They're a looksmatch. Deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 08:58 PM
7

This is a profoundly retarded comment. You should see a doctor.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 08:56 PM
11

This constant insistence that "misogyny" is the cause of inceldom is exactly the kind of gaslighting that leads incels to feel they were lied to about what women care about. Women don't care about misogyny. If anything, being misogynistic would actually improve a man's chances of getting laid. Of course, not by much, because what overwhelmingly matters the most to women is physical attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 08:41 PM
0

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 06:51 PM
3

I like other women more for their faces than their bodies. That's the gayest thing I've ever read.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 05:00 PM
1

Are you gay?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 04:42 PM
13

Actually, it's women who think average men and ugly men are the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 01:00 PM
1

Nah just ugly on the outside. Women don't care about the inside.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 08:38 AM
4

No, my face and women's hypergamy is 100% of the reason I don't get sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 10:53 PM
3

You “need” for sex will never override a woman’s desire to not have sex with you. In your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 10:49 PM
1

That's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 10:24 PM
2

I'm a man of many insights.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 10:13 PM
5

All of the above.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 09:26 PM
1

Eventually they do, once women become old and desperate and have to settle. Old women don't count though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 09:21 PM
1

No. I don't think I will.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:52 PM
6

the only thing causing school shootings is the shooter choosing to do so. Well that's just a factually incorrect assessment of cause and effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:27 PM
3

I know most don't meet women's hypergamous standards
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:15 PM
5

Purge needs to happen more often.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:09 PM
4

Where did I apologize for school shootings? I merely observed their root cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:06 PM
1

Right, but I am indeed saying that the kind of psychological trauma men experience from sexlessness is the same kind (and same severity) as what women experience from rape. I explained in OP why they are the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:05 PM
13

Ah, a woman lacking empathy. How unsurprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:03 PM
3

I need a woman to therapeutically massage my penis with her vagina (without a condom), yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:02 PM
1

Right, but this sub is majority US, so it's fair to assume OP is very likely American.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:01 PM
1

It's an American problem because America is where all the guns are. The problem simply manifests differently in other countries, but the cause is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:53 PM
2

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:46 PM
8

I don't wonder; I've always known people often hate those who speak the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:42 PM
0

Yuck. I'll take option #1.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:37 PM
2

Your hypocrisy is wishing that I continue to be raped when presumably you'd take issue with a man wishing rape on a woman. Of course, that is my presumption. Perhaps you'd take no issue with that, in which case, congrats on being consistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:36 PM
0

any age over 18 Does this restriction also apply to option #2
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:31 PM
8

Are you also under the delusion that women's standards are that low
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:26 PM
10

Why do women have a fetish for pretending their standards are this low? Women's victim complex is fucking astounding.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:19 PM
2

A woman being a hypocrite, why am I not surprised
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:17 PM
9

No actually there's a very direct causal relationship between the desire to ostracize low status males and children subsequently dying in school shootings. We could end school shootings overnight if we just stopped being bigoted toward low status males, but people are far too stubborn for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:00 PM
5

She looks about 50% plastic. You're evaluating 'good' incorrectly. Women can stay sexy with age, but they can't stay cute. Cute is exclusively a young woman's game. So, to a guy that only cares about sexiness, she's very good looking. To a guy that cares about cuteness, she's not very good looking at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 06:56 PM
5

Olivia Munn is 41. He's a beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 06:49 PM
16

This is why dudes shoot up schools. If you're comfortable directly causing parents to have to endure their child's death, then go for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 06:48 PM
3

Or, even better, hear from men who have been forced to not have sex against their will.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 06:27 PM
2

That’s not rape it’s not the same Well yea, if it persists for long enough, it's far worse than rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 06:26 PM
2

Yes and I blame women for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 06:21 PM
3

Idk did you get raped before? Yes. I was forced to live without sex for 26 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 06:16 PM
3

Can you really blame women Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 06:11 PM
3

Look, women don’t owe men relationships. That is where you are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 05:46 PM
27

Reality will permanently poison your mind*, not the blackpill. Don't shoot the messenger.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 04:11 PM
12

What the hell is this nonsense? My mom is great and I love her very much. I probably would've gone on a spree by now if I hadn't had such a great mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 03:42 PM
6

No, I'm angry at women and the genetic lottery.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 03:40 PM
2

It's not hard to observe what traits correlate most with who women give sex to.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 03:23 PM
-1

Horseshit. There are zero tall and good looking men who actually still fail. They don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 03:16 PM
3

No, incels need sex (hookers/unattractive women don't count).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 03:03 PM
1

Q4All; Was the sexual revolution a net good or a net bad for western societies?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 02:46 PM
1

To me they're all 5-6 range, with the third girl and fourth dude being 7s. I'm surprised TRM didn't rate them harsher. Ofc the difference is that the dudes could very easily be incels whilst the women would never be.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/21 12:33 AM
3

If she spits, she doesn't find you attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/21 12:25 AM
1

Very true. There's nothing hot about the idea of sex with a condom tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/21 07:47 PM
9

Women here literally think that is how it works. Women are blind to their own hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/21 07:45 PM
1

If it's not a detriment to their attractiveness, then it's not a flaw in the first place. Those people are not any more or less hotter due to 'loving' their flaw.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/21 07:43 PM
3

Coz that won't get men sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/21 05:13 PM
3

I just think people would be better off loving themselves flaws and all. That's not gonna get men sex. So no, men are not better of doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/21 05:13 PM
0

dumpy but very much in love x doubt
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/21 01:28 AM
2

b b b bUt wHaT aBoUt MeN?! Like clockwork. I'm not female, and I'm not gay, so I don't care about other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 09:12 AM
0

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 08:31 AM
1

50 hookups in 4 years :( why are women this way
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 08:26 AM
1

What the hell else about women am I supposed to find attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 06:23 PM
1

I'd love for that to be true but unfortunately I am helplessly attracted to the female body.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 04:59 PM
6

If they're with someone who thinks their ex was better at sex than them, they're already loveless.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 03:44 PM
-1

they don't like women. Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 03:18 PM
3

Men are in a catch-22. Whilst I am disgusted by women's nature, I am also disgusted when women lie about their nature. Either way, I am disgusted. Not all problems have a solution. I think it is just inevitable that I be permanently disgusted by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 02:41 PM
1

you’re losing the game No actually it's called winning an argument. You should try it sometime.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 02:29 PM
0

Ideal according to men. No actually it's from a study where women were the subjects. Most women cant look at a an average dick and tell how big it is. No actually women were able to judge penis size fairly accurately in this study. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133079
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 02:21 PM
2

A guy can be huge and have no idea what the fuck he’s doing. A guy can also be huge and know exactly what he's doing. A guy who knows what he's doing can't grow a bigger penis. And I don't believe for a second that women don't prefer larger penises. The ideal dick size is something like 6.4 inches long and 5 inches girth, which is an 80th percentile dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 02:13 PM
-1

This is as disgusting as when women do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 01:49 PM
1

You can’t really help thinking that if it’s true What you can help is stopping being with a man you don't love.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 01:48 PM
10

There’s no reason you can’t be the best she ever had. Yes, there is. Men can't learn to have a bigger dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 01:43 PM
5

Actually, it only challenges the 'men good' part, and like I already said, I don't care about other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 01:40 PM
3

b b b bUt wHaT aBoUt mEn?! I am a straight man, I don't care about other men. Women's whataboutism every time someone makes a comment on women is so tiring.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 12:45 PM
10

TIL women on here feel it's okay to think their exes were better at sex than their current man.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 12:34 PM
–

Of course it’s ok to think your ex is better. No it isn't. Its not okay to think it and stay with your partner regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 09:23 AM
–

it's ok to think your ex was better in bed. No it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 09:21 AM
1

Happy looking couples =/= happy couples. Pretty much 100% of the time you learn more about the details of a couple's relationship, you learn that the relationship is not as happy as it appears to be on the outside. People don't advertise their shortcomings. That's how you explain all the happy looking couples.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/21 09:16 PM
1

Irrelevant to the claim being debated here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 07:37 PM
–

Factually incorrect. Perhaps you have not heard of socially enforced monogamy. It's how society functioned for hundreds of years, and how many societies still function today. And it absolutely ensures a more equal distribution of women to men (and thus, sex too).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/21 11:38 PM
2

I only mean women that look fat. Some women can be technically overweight BMI without looking fat. That's 68% of all women that are overweight BMI, not young women. Only young women count.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/21 06:05 AM
1

Fat women don't count.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/21 05:42 AM
4

Finally. Female substitutes cannot come soon enough #RepealAndReplace.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/21 03:15 AM
11

CMV: If a man cannot get casual sex, he is not sexually attractive to women (even if he can get relationships).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/21 01:47 AM
1

I need women to perform therapeutic massages on my penis with their vaginas, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 07:18 AM
0

32 year old You dodged a bullet.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 04:00 AM
0

Notice the horrifying number of 'yes' answers to this. Women who make their boyfriend wear condoms don't desire sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 03:15 AM
1

All three of those hairstyles are bonkers so it's difficult to compare.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 04:06 AM
1

at a gay party Wtf is it with you and gay men...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:35 PM
1

None of what you just said contradicts what I said. If the commentors on that post simply dismantled the methodology of the study, I'd have no issue. Instead they just decided to either misrepresent what the article said, or actually even agree with what the article said but instead pretend that what it said has been obvious all along. In fact, the methodology of the study could be catastrophically flawed and the point I made here would remain utterly righteous.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 08:35 PM
8

Who gives a fuck what 30 year old women want
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 06:06 PM
2

Sure, but it is also regularly suggested HERE that women do not care about looks just as much as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 06:05 PM
7

The amount of disingenuousness in the comments of this post is fucking astounding. Please delete your Reddit account if you did either of the following: Pretended as though that post merely said "looks matter", when it very clearly and specifically said that looks matter JUST AS MUCH TO WOMEN AS THEY DO TO MEN. Pretended as though everyone already understands that looks matter just as much to women as they do to men. It is REGULARLY suggested by people here (let alone in normieland) that women c…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 05:45 PM
1

Did you not read the post? It didn't say "looks matter", it said looks matter just as much to women as it does to men. You're simply a liar if you're gonna pretend as though people here don't often suggest women care about looks less than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 05:41 PM
3

Did you not read the post? It didn't say "looks matter", it said looks matter just as much to women as it does to men. You're simply a liar if you're gonna pretend as though people here don't often suggest women care about looks less than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 05:41 PM
1

That's good! I merely wanted to make sure that this study wasn't being interpreted by you or anyone else as evidence against hypergamy, or as evidence that women find a wider range of men attractive than men find women attractive. Since you are not doing that, we have no issue :)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 03:44 PM
2

Yes, but it is a logical error to think this information means men's preferences are narrower than women's preferences. The typical complaint about women finding a smaller portion of men attractive than men find women attractive is not proven false by this study. This study doesn't really tell us anything we shouldn't already have expected, and it's useless without knowing how narrow individual men and women's preferences are on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 03:32 PM
2

Does it say anything about how narrow the preferences of individual men and women are? If we assume the conventional wisdom is true that a given man finds far more women attractive than a given woman finds men attractive, it is to be expected that there is more consensus among who men consider attractive than who women consider attractive. It is a logical error to take this study to mean more men fit women's preferences than women who fit men's preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 03:11 PM
3

Yea, women's racial preferences are another aspect of their hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 07:27 PM
3

6' tall is top 15%. 6" penis is top 25%. 6 figure salary is usually the third 6, not 6 pack, and 6 figure salary is top 13%.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 07:21 PM
1

You don't have Bofa.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 07:17 PM
5

That is because you are a woman, and thus rate men hypergamously.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 07:05 PM
1

Women are shallow. Unfortunately, most women seem to object to that, so that is why it is funny when a woman says something that so blatantly proves it true lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 09:00 PM
1

I didn't claim to be above it. It's just amusing to see women struggle to even conceive of another woman not being as shallow as them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 06:51 PM
-2

Have you considered that maybe she just isn't as shallow as you
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 02:07 PM
4

Stop pretending No.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 02:03 PM
–

I'm not suggesting they "should" care.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 12:54 PM
–

The difference is that men have real problems and women do not, yet women find a way to whine and moan just as much as men, or even more.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 12:43 PM
–

Men are advised to do just the same, to gain varied experience and settle down with the best they can. That's not what that quote advises. The quote says to date a particular type of man when you are young and not looking for commitment, and then date a very different particular type of man when you are looking for a husband. I'm just shocked that a woman would so brazenly and blatantly advocate AF/BB to women out in the open.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 12:40 PM
–

As is everything discussed on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 12:37 PM
–

Just came across this quote from some female CEO called Sheryl Sandberg; When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. Someone who values fairness and expects or…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 12:22 PM
1

"He's my best friend"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 02:50 PM
2

Get used to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 12:51 PM
6

Many people on the sub today are big mad about facts. You hate to see it!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 05:07 PM
5

Boo hoo. Facts don't care about your feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 05:04 PM
4

More like "facts reaffirming incels".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 05:03 PM
7

Yea and that's what we're talking about here. Getting sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 03:06 PM
10

is that all you are offering? No. But it's all women value.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 01:05 PM
2

Yes you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 12:35 PM
2

nobody wants to improve themselves There is nothing a man can do to meaningfully improve his chances of getting sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 12:08 PM
2

mfw I saw those new stats on male sexlessness
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 12:06 PM
2

We don’t want the same 20% of guys because each woman has different tastes and interests. No they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/21 01:34 AM
0

Incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/21 12:54 AM
4

Actually, women are the ones who don't know what average is, not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/21 09:12 PM
2

Guarantee his wife isn't hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 05:34 AM
1

I specified SMV in my original comment; The % of men that can meaningfully increase their SMV above their looks-value via social status/personality is a small minority. Sure, I argued against your points about trophy wives/gold diggers also, because I thought you were wrong about that as well. I just brought up SMV again in that last comment because I didn't want the conversation to stray too far away from my original point, which was about SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 04:22 AM
1

Yes but we disagree that your 20% estimate is accurate, let alone conservative. I'd agree that 20% of relationships or more are a betabuxx scenario, but those are not examples of men increasing their sexual value with non-looks traits, and the "looks are a threshold" argument is typically made in response to someone claiming that a man's sexual value is determined mostly by his looks. Nobody disagrees that betabuxxing exists lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 03:57 AM
1

Again, can you link the study comparing the attractiveness of the individuals? What? I'm the one saying we don't have that information. Except they wouldn’t be there if he didn’t supplement his looks with his status. And the majority of them wouldn’t be there if he was Quasimodo How does that contradict my claim? I'm not saying his money provides no value to her, I'm saying it provides no sexual value to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 03:49 AM
0

It can be "part of the conversation" (whatever that means) as much as you like. It's just an apex fallacy to claim that the importance of looks for men in general functions like a threshold when we only see that occurring for a small minority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 03:41 AM
0

Everyone has a personality. Obviously, I meant most men try to have one that's attractive. Frame/game/masculine presence/playful sociability etc isn’t “having a personality.” It’s having attractive behavioral traits that can absolutely be curated. Stop being pedantic. Those are what is commonly referred to when the word 'personality' is used on this sub and I was using that shorthand. There are entire classes on commanding a room and giving presentations and tonality and “NLP.” There's entire cl…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 03:38 AM
1

Because even the OKC study you guys love posting shows the same thing - women are attracted to their age matches, NOT older men. No, that shows that women are most attracted to their age matches, all else being equal. A 8/10 40 year old man is still going to be hotter than a 4/10 30 year old man, and we have no idea what the attractiveness are of the people in those age-gap relationships. The stat tells us nothing without that extra information. Very not true - she’s been moved in, and become a …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 03:30 AM
0

Sure if you believe status/game is something most men are able to acquire if they just put their mind to it, but I disagree that it is. I think the fact that most men don't have it is evidence that they can't get it. Most men do try to have a personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 03:13 AM
1

How is a 10 year age gap automatically an example of a man dating up in looks? The majority of that stat will be made up of people over the age of 30, wherein a 10 year age gap is not a significant difference in looks. Nevermind the fact that that stat probably even skews toward older people for precisely that reason. That stat does not tell us anything meaningful at all. Another point is that a gold digger/trophy wife isn't even an example of a man becoming more attractive with non-looks traits…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 03:11 AM
0

Men who are HB5 through HB8 can increase their SMV via a combo of looks-maxing and/or presence-maxing and/or status-maxing. Men do this all the time. Except they quite literally do not do this 'all the time'. In fact the vast majority of the time, they do not, as evidenced by the fact that most 5/10 men end up dating around 5/10 women. It is exactly as fallacious as claiming that, since a minority of middle-income people are able to get rich, that therefore it's possible for all middle-income pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 02:47 AM
0

Because such relationships are even smaller for women. Sure, a trophy wife may be like 100 times more common than a trophy husband, but that's only because trophy boys almost never occur. The vast majority of men do not get trophy wives however, thus it is still an apex fallacy to project that experience onto all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 02:36 AM
1

It’s actually not low - look at the gold diggers and trophy wives of the world. Except that it is literally an example of how it is low, as the vast majority of men do not end up getting a trophy wife. Hard disagree, or there would be roughly equal numbers of the female version of the aforementioned male half of the gold diggers/trophy wives/age gap relationships Such relationships are very uncommon for both genders though. Sure, such relationships may be like 0.1% for women and 5% for men (thou…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 02:32 AM
-1

CMV: The claim that "looks are a threshold" for men is an apex fallacy. The % of men that can meaningfully increase their SMV above their looks-value via social status/personality is a small minority. This is evidenced by the fact that most men are not able to date up in looks (percentile-wise) and end up having to date around their looksmatch. For most men, the hotness of the women they can get is mostly determined by their own physical hotness, thus it is an apex fallacy to say that the import…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 02:19 AM
1

Yes but the issue is that that possibility is very low, as evidenced by the fact that most men are not able to supersede their looks value and end up having to date their looksmatch. So for most men, the importance of looks is not particularly threshold-like. For most men, the hotness of the women they can get is determined mostly by their own physical hotness, which means the importance of looks for most men is not fundamentally different to how looks are important for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 02:12 AM
1

But once you pass that threshold, they’re far more flexible than men’s looks standards for women No they aren't. If that was true, we'd see hot women dating average men all the time. But we don't. The vast majority of the time, hot women (and all other women for that matter) just date around their looksmatch.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 01:47 AM
3

"My vegan daughter" lmao she's not fucking vegan if she keeps demanding meat. It's like moronic parents insisting their children are Christian or something as if they personally elected to be a part of that religion, when in reality the parents just forced it on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 06:57 PM
1

So if he's happy in a relationship and what he's getting out of it What he 'gets out of it' changes if a new piece of information comes to light that indicates she isn't as attracted to him as he previously thought. Knowing her behavior with her exes changes his perception, not his reality. You're right, his perception would change from being misaligned with reality to being aligned with reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 06:27 PM
1

Well if it is indeed true that Mr Right had to wait for sex whilst other men got it quickly and freely, then Mr Right would be wise to be neurotic and insecure about that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 06:27 PM
3

So long as Mr Right isn't made to wait for sex whilst those 'fun' partners got it quickly and freely, most wouldn't have an issue with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 03:23 PM
1

Correct, but of course the cognitively impaired individuals that frequent this sub are incapable of understanding this. People are not willing to settle almost at all on looks for a possibly more compatible personality in a partner, as evidenced by how few people will date below what is the best looking partner they can get (ie, their looksmatch).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 12:48 AM
1

Well adjusted adults Aka bitter old women no longer capable of love.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 04:38 AM
1

Maybe you shouldn’t treat dates as “payment towards sex” Tell that to women!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 04:13 AM
1

OP look too good for it to be true Clearly you are not aware of how hypergamous women are in 2021.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 03:47 AM
1

I'd like to think this is satire but I wouldn't be surprised if it is sincere.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 02:54 AM
5

Her willingness to do anal is how you know she loves you. Especially if she did it for other men in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 04:20 PM
5

Thankfully people are calling out his delusion that he got dates for "talking like a normal person" in the replies. I don't think I could emotionally handle that much bluepill going unchallenged.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 05:42 AM
7

Looks matter. People need to stop with this strawman. He didn't say merely "looks matter". He said they're an absolute necessity, as without them, you cannot even get in the door. Nobody disagrees nor ever disagreed that 'looks matter'. The disagreement is about the specific ways and degree to which they are important.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 05:36 AM
2

They're anti-marriage for men, not women. Thus those two beliefs are utterly uncontradictory.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 05:30 AM
10

How do you people constantly misunderstand this. If I voiced my opinion about transwomen in women's sports (even outside of work, ie on my social media for example), I'd receive disciplinary action. If I did it again, I'd get fired. Furthermore, people who hold the opposite opinion can seemingly express it to their hearts' content (both in and outside of work) with no consequence whatsoever. It's not "critical feedback" that I have an issue with. It's specifically the measures taken to harm my l…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 02:14 PM
1

What?! When?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 02:05 PM
1

No I'm not expecting anyone to share but I just want to Know if she was actually a foid or a tranny. Know if she was hot as she always claimed.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 10:00 AM
0

Did anyone here ever pic swap with KandyApplez?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 03:48 AM
10

Anyways, this guy is extremely attractive, very much my type, and I am very very attracted to him. Aaand that's all you need to know, folks.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 09:00 AM
1

PSA; Do NOT go looking through the #breastreduction tag on TikTok. It is painful.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 03:26 AM
10

“Oh she doesn’t want to date you?” “Hypergamy”. This, but unironically.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/21 02:07 PM
1

I think some women who are (or at least believe themselves to be-) capable of feeling sexual attraction on the basis of personality think that sexual attraction purely on the basis of physical traits is dehumanizing as it is only valuing the body and not the mind. Then again, maybe not, but that's why I'm asking. One woman has already said that it did indeed bother her initially.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/21 01:15 AM
3

Q4Women who believe their sexual attraction to men is not predominantly based on physical traits; Do you believe men's sexual attraction to you is predominantly based on physical traits? If so, are you bothered by the asymmetry of men having sex with you predominantly because they desire your physical body whilst you have sex with them predominantly because of their personality (or whatever other non-physical trait)?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 10:26 PM
1

How would her looking like her before help those millions of other women? Because she was attractive, which obviously benefits someone quite a lot (particularly a woman).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 08:44 PM
3

Raw PIV when you're snipped Wait whaaa??? Getting snipped makes cooming feel less good?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 01:45 PM
1

Q4SexhavingMen; How would you rate the quality of condom PIV in comparison to raw PIV?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 11:55 AM
5

Did you accidentally reply to the wrong comment? How on earth is that a self pity rant?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 11:38 AM
2

A woman can be raped even when she's totally unconscious. That is not the circumstance u/Legitimate-Tap-2435 is describing. He is describing when women get drunk, but are still conscious and actively choose to engage in sex. A not insignificant number of people try to characterize that as her being raped but never characterize a man as raped when he gets drunk and actively chooses to engage in sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 04:41 PM
1

Why are you asking for personal experience when your question is about population wide trends? Anecdotal experience =/= anecdotal observation. It is far, far less egregious to draw population-wide conclusions from anecdotal observation than from anecdotal experience, since the sample size of the former is perhaps hundreds or even thousands of times larger than that of the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 09:02 AM
2

I consider it child abuse for parents to feed their kids so irresponsibly. Many of the severely overweight people I know were overfed as kids and have just always been fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 04:03 AM
1

Q4All (but mainly old people, ie 35+); Do you believe that on average, members of the opposite sex was more or less attractive 15-20 years ago than today (whether that's looks or personality or whatever you believe constitutes attractiveness)? If so, why?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 12:46 AM
1

And there'd be nothing wrong with that, as the vast majority of human knowledge on space has been discovered by people who have not personally been there.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 12:03 AM
1

If you're an incel, you have no true idea of what women want This is as profoundly retarded of a statement as claiming you need to have personally gone to space in order to study space.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 10:52 PM
2

There is nothing in life to be happy about. Misery is rational.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 09:38 AM
3

There's nothing suspicious about men discussing the thing that deprives them of what they want most.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 03:15 AM
2

The child needs support from somewhere and no way in hell am I gonna pay for some 14 year old Chadlet's offspring through taxes. He can pay for his own damn kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 02:43 AM
5

Repeal it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 02:41 AM
3

"People on PPD are crazy!" - person on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 02:23 PM
2

"All"? I think you'll find that only some of us are women. Please do not paint with such a broad brush!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 03:40 AM
2

Billie Eilish at #1 for those juicy teenage boobas. Christina Hendricks at #2 (would've been #1 had I not recently learned that she is actually way fatter than I thought). Kate Upton at #3 because I am personally biased against her since it's always irritated the shit out of me how she used as an example of a supposed "undeniably very attractive woman". Her face is nice and her tits are great but everything below that is just tragic. I do not particularly care about face much compared to other m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 01:57 AM
4

I just read u/Smoogs2's comment history to find this discussion you're referencing and seems you were arguing that there are men here who advocate for restricting women's liberty (specifically them being disallowed jobs, but whatever). If you read my comment in this thread as advocacy for limiting women's freedom, then that is quite an astonishing misreading, even for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 01:07 AM
1

Are women happy to be merely as sexually valuable to their man as every other ordinary average women is? I was under the impression that this was not the case. If that is the case, I can understand why women desire a man who lasts quite a while in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 12:51 AM
1

Yes, women are hypergamous and that affects the value judgements they make. Regardless, we don't even need to agree on the particulars of what exactly causes women to define a man one way or another in order to agree that it is women's value judgement of me that determines whether or not she'll choose to have sex with me, not my own value judgement of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 12:40 AM
1

Natural is amoral Yes, that is quite literally my point. You should be directing this at the women who believe their preferences are 'justified' as a result of them being natural. I suggest you re-read my comments in this thread, because it is quite clear you have misread them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 12:10 AM
-1

That's the way it is. Not much you can change about it. I see you have not yet been introduced to the concept of socially enforced monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 12:03 AM
1

If you feel that natural does not equate to right, explain Why? Convincing someone else of your moral philosophy is quite difficult (and often impossible, given that it usually requires sharing baseline moral assumptions). It is much easier to simply point out the logical contradictions in their own moral philosophy, and that is what I was doing here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 11:55 PM
1

RE; your edit Are you not aware that different people define things differently? Who I define myself as has no bearing on whether or not women choose to have sex with me; that is instead determined by what women define me as. And women's definition of me is unfortunately largely governed by their hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 11:50 PM
1

I am not so much 'objecting' to anything so much as I am pointing out the bizarre cognitive dissonance that exist in the minds of women who believe their actions are justified specifically as a result of them being natural, whilst simultaneously believing that rape isn't justified as a result of it being natural. This is utterly clear from my very first comment, which was; it's bizarre that women use the naturalistic argument to claim their actions are just, since that argument can also be used …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 11:41 PM
1

I am not just randomly stating 'rape is natural' out of the blue. I am stating it to demonstrate how it is bizarre that woman will attempt to justify their actions specifically on the basis of them being natural, as the exact same argument can be used to justify rape, which is also natural, and which women surely agree is not justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 11:33 PM
2

You don't think a man will coom quicker with his personal 10 than with an average plain foid? Sure those other things are factors, but all else being equal, women should be wary of a man who takes a long time to coom with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 11:30 PM
2

Women's sexual liberty and a relatively equal distribution of sex among men cannot co-exist. If you want the latter, you must restrict the former. Given a choice between those two things, liberal societies will favor the former. Thus the latter will not be 'solved'.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 11:28 PM
1

I'm really not sure what is so difficult to grasp here. I am saying that an act being natural does not mean it is justified. Perhaps it is justified or unjustified for other reasons, but it is not justified or unjustified as a result of it being natural.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 11:24 PM
1

Well there's different kinds of pain, and I can even empathize with desiring some of them. Certainly if I have not masturbated enough times for my penis to be aching by the end of the day, I wasted the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 11:20 PM
1

I "dodged" a question that wasn't even asked to me?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 11:15 PM
2

it's not that hard to fathom they'd want guy who lasts long. It is when you consider what that denotes about his level of attraction to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 11:11 PM
1

Is today 'agree with u/RepresentativeSwan1 day' or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 11:10 PM
1

PAINFUL Yes some women desire that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 11:08 PM
-1

I mean you don’t consider yourself losers do you? The relevant question is who do women view as losers, since they are the ones doing the selecting. And women's answer to that question is where the hypergamy resides.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 11:04 PM
3

My question is why do they even desire it in the first place? It is the equivalent of a man desiring a woman who won't give him blowjobs or condomless sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 10:49 PM
1

Do you even realize that you are not disagreeing with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 10:48 PM
1

Okay, so we agree that nothing is justified as result of the mere fact that it is natural.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 10:28 PM
3

Well ofc #NotAll, but some women apparently do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 10:17 PM
1

Yes... as is rape. The bizarre part is thinking 'natural = just', as that necessarily means you believe rape = just.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 10:15 PM
5

It is bizarre to me that women seem to desire a man who can last 30+ minutes pounding away at them. If your man is lasting that long or longer, you should dump him and go find a man who is actually attracted to you. I don't think women realize what they are saying when they proudly advertise how long their man can last..
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 09:52 PM
2

His point is that it's bizarre that women use the naturalistic argument to claim their actions are just, since that argument can also be used to claim rape is just (since both are natural).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 09:45 PM
1

Out of curiosity, how old are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 05:59 PM
1

Most guys don't need to tip on order for them to make a lot of money. They make their money off of what are called "whales"; the minority of dudes with no life and a decent amount expendable income who tip an extraordinarily large amount compared to the average subscriber.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 12:19 PM
1

Most women do not resort to onlyfans. Yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 02:56 AM
1

Easiest pathway to money. I'd do it if I could.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 02:20 AM
4

Wow. Women's rights were an error.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 09:20 PM
1

I really hope that shit scales because 21 cooms a month is such rookie numbers. I get that done in 3 or 4 days.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 09:04 PM
2

If I believed she genuinely loved me then yea.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 08:43 PM
0

No. Yes. 26. Male. As to the "why" of #2: I don't believe women really fall head over heels infatuated with men as adults the way they do when they're teenagers. I've often read women even admit as much, though they think that is a good thing rather than a bad thing. They'll express something along the lines of how her high school relationship(s) were completely "unstable"; she made her whole life about him, thought he was perfect and couldn't focus on anything else, whereas now as an adult her …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 07:40 PM
1

If they weren’t they’re perpetually bitter because they know the ship sailed — if they missed the chance to be with young beautiful women then they’ll never have it again (unless they become loaded in middle age). A high IQ comment from poppy, who'da thunk it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 07:21 PM
3

CMV: Women are not actually interested in astrology; rather they just believe that facts and logic are constructs of the patriarchy and view perpetuating something as anti-logic as astrology as dismantling the patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 06:40 PM
1

Right now, I'm ass. But I oscillate back and forth every few weeks. Hopefully if I ever get a GF she'll have both so I don't have to choose.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 06:30 PM
1

If personality actually affected attraction to any significant degree, then couples wouldn't be as extremely looksmatched as they are, as people would be pairing up based on personality preference more than based on what is the best looking partner they can get. But that is not the case. Aside from the rare exception, couples are extremely looksmatched because that is the most important component of attraction, and people pair up mostly based on what is the best looking partner they can get (and…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 04:10 PM
1

Lol, I hadn't even considered the fact that you were big dicked, I just tagged you because yes, this is indeed an example of poppy's bad faith arguments. Unless you honestly believe she genuinely thinks someone is 'hypocritical' if they don't consider all forms of hormone treatment to be equally good. I'm assuming (hoping) you don't...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 03:49 PM
3

I know damn well the 22 year old college kid who was flirting with me at the bar last week was as uninterested in fucking me as I was in him Uh no, he 100% would've creampied you if you'd offered to let him
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 12:52 PM
9

The only difference is women are more likely to ignore their physical standards for men with subjectively interesting personalities This doesn't happen. Women disregard their physical standards when they are desperate, except not out of sexual frustration, but out of desperation for companionship/a family/the status of being a relationshipped woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 10:40 AM
1

It is hilariously moronic to think it's hypocritical to say that different types of hormone therapy are not all equally good. They are not the same, and I explained to how specifically they are different. I don't even think you actually believe it because it is too dumb for even you. u/decoy88 come get ur girl, she be wildin again.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 10:12 AM
5

I am to be married to a 2 meters tall, hung guy You're not exactly making a good argument for why a man shouldn't put his sons on hormone therapy so that they can grow taller/a bigger dick...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 09:46 AM
0

What?! No! A larger penis is pretty much guaranteed to increase in his well-being as an adult. Literally no man with a large penis would prefer to have a small one. Turning into some butchered abomination of a human that very few people find attractive (ie getting gender reassignment surgery) is not even remotely as likely to increase his well-being, and indeed there is good chance it will absolutely tank it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 09:30 AM
2

That's cool but it's not quite Edson Barboza wiping a man's soul from existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 03:43 AM
0

As men, we must ensure our children live the lives we could not, by gifting them with abnormally large genitalia. This, but unironically. I'm gonna guess you're one of those people that thinks CRISPR genetic engineering will be unethical as well, amirite?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 02:18 AM
5

Let alone for a perverse obsession with their penis size Women are the ones with a perverse obsession with penis size, and the kid will want to leverage that fact when he is older. How tf is that unethical? If the hormone therapy is likely to have adverse side-effects, then sure it is; idk what the success rate of hormone therapy is. But if there is a reliable way to increase the size that your son's penis will grow to without any risk of adverse side-effects, it is unethical to NOT perform that…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 02:16 AM
3

He would be violating ZERO boundaries.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 02:05 AM
4

That sounds like the wisest would-be father in existence. DOUBLE greetings to the man who cares about his son's happiness more than soyciety's irrational judgements of "creepiness" or whatever other emotionally derived nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 02:03 AM
5

It's utterly rational and good and the child will be immensely grateful for it when he grows up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 02:00 AM
9

I want to say that one of the FIRST things I asked him when we matched on Tinder was 'What are you looking for' and he answered 'I am looking to see someone consistently and then eventually a relationship'. So this was not just a fuck buddy arrangement lol. Oh, my sweet summer child.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 01:58 AM
3

Dwight, who could be viewed as a more traditional red pill type guy LOL. Casting more shade than a solar eclipse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 11:20 PM
2

I'm 26.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 11:13 PM
3

I mean she can somewhat 'live her own life' but if her happiness isn't critically dependent on my love then she isn't crazy about me. I want a woman who is crazy about me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 10:53 PM
9

Yes, I want a woman who is absolutely crazy about me. Why would I not want that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 10:34 PM
4

Yes, I want a woman who is absolutely crazy about me. Why would I not want that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 10:34 PM
8

It amazes me how often women will express something along the lines of how her high school relationship(s) were completely unstable; she made her whole life about him and couldn't focus on anything else, whereas now as an adult her relationships are much more balanced and she has her own life alongside her relationship. Uh yea I want the former kind of love from a woman, not the latter. It boggles my mind that women think that comparison casts the latter in a better light than the former.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 10:03 PM
2

Skull looks fine tbh, but the skin underneath the chin is turbo saggy. I'd have surgery to get it removed. It's insane how important non-saggyness under the chin is for facial attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 07:30 PM
0

I'd both date her and hookup with her, assuming it's not something crazy like she tried to cut the dude's dick off whilst he was asleep.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 06:09 PM
1

https://i.redd.it/6kar1fbv3zd21.jpg You honestly believe that is what an average early 30s man looks like? When you say 'average', do you mean median attractiveness, or do you mean neither-good-looking-nor-ugly? I have to assume women are using the latter when they say 'average'.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 06:07 PM
0

inb4 women: "Ryan Gosling" This website is a good example of what a random-ish sample of people would look like at each age. I guarantee women would hypergamously rate the vast majority of men on there as below average lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 05:18 PM
5

If your gonna REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 03:00 PM
2

I disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 10:00 AM
-1

I do not believe men experience rape trauma.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 03:28 AM
0

If we didn't have dna tests i might agree We didn't for 99.9% of human history; the time during which our evolved psychology formed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 03:15 AM
6

I'm exceptionally bored so I am going to share with you guys a high IQ theory of mine that only the the Discord server has had the privilege of being introduced to thus far. Cuckoldry = Rape. The logic is simple; Women evolved to find rape traumatic because being impregnated by an unsuitable male carried the opportunity cost of her being unable to mate with a suitable male for 9 months, which was massively detrimental to her reproductive success. Men did not evolve such trauma to rape as it does…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 03:10 AM
8

Bullshit. I have learnt not to trust women's hypergamous ratings of men. That "3/10" is probably actually a 6/10. Women just rate men absurdly low.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 01:28 AM
7

No, they're saying that all women go for the top attractiveness percentages of men and then end up having to abandon all their other standards in order to compete for them. It is for these men that 'the bar is on the floor'. For average men, the bar is not even remotely near the floor.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 01:17 AM
8

It makes men on the losing end of that distribution mad because obviously men want sex and they're not getting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 10:54 PM
2

Most people have that much sex in a year at uni. 5 partners in a single year is considerably above average. For starters, half the population doesn't even go to University. Then among the ones that do, you have people in relationships who are obviously not racking up 5 partners a year. Then of the remaining single people, I'd bet a significant portion of them are simply sexless (whether by choice or otherwise).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 10:50 PM
1

15y:8 partners What?!?! That is fucking unbelievable. Women are disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 10:44 PM
7

The averages are similar. The distribution is what is likely very dissimilar (ie greater n-count variance among males than females).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 10:39 PM
4

Incredible. Women will say stuff like this, then turn around and complain about rape. Disgusting hypocrites.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 10:36 PM
1

"Personality" doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 10:20 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 10:17 PM
1

Fookin' based, mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 07:33 PM
1

What's wrong with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 05:32 PM
1

Uh what? I'm not sure how that relates to any part of my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 01:30 PM
1

The age matters to you so you can feel better idk. The age matters because there is an enormous difference between the way the average 17 year old looks and the way the average 12 year old looks. As I clarified for you in the other thread, my issue was with Novadina conflating attraction to 17 year olds with attraction to 12 year olds as if they weren't enormously meaningfully different things, which they are. I would say attraction to 17 year olds is normal male sexuality and attraction to 12 y…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 01:17 PM
1

I don't really get sexy lingerie. Sport bras are the best. Wow, a comment from you I actually agree with. I guess a broken clock really is right twice a day.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 01:03 PM
1

I never said all men love 7 year olds. You said "Men start leering circa 7 tbh." To which I responded "I imagine those men are an extreme minority." To which you responded "You’d imagine the female experience wrong." Thus, I reasonably inferred that you disagree with my claim that men who leer at 7 year olds are an extreme minority. So, I asked you outright what % of men you believe leer at 7 year olds, and what % qualifies as 'an extreme minority', so as to avoid any further confusion. Let me a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 12:57 PM
7

Please do not post homosexuality here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 12:38 PM
1

The percent of men who leer are girls sub 17 is far larger than what you’re willing to admit I didn't say 'sub 17'. I said 7. Men leer at telltale signs of cuteness and slight womanhood. Ask any person who used to be a girl. I agree that men will be at least somewhat attracted to girls under 17, but I imagine the girl would have to be at least 14 for most men to find her somewhat attractive (and even then, she would likely needed to have started sexual development earlier than average).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 12:35 PM
1

It does not matter what age men actually have a thing for. Zippo claimed men have a thing for 17 year olds. Novadina then responded as though Zippo claimed men have a thing for 12 year olds, when he did not claim that. That is what I am taking issue with. I hope I won't have to explain this to you a fourth time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 12:17 PM
2

You’d imagine the female experience wrong. What do you estimate is the % of men that leer at 7 year olds? What numerical % do you believe qualifies as an 'extreme minority'?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 12:07 PM
1

It's not relevant to Zippo's comment, which claimed that men would have a thing for a 17 year old girl, and that is the comment she replied to. If she wants to bring up 12 year old girls, that's fine, but she shouldn't do it in a way that insinuated Zippo was claiming men would have a thing for 12 year olds, as he wasn't doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 12:06 PM
0

Also I got my period at 11. Right but I imagine you didn't have a visibly sexually developed body until a decent while after that. Men start leering circa 7 tbh. I imagine those men are an extreme minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 11:55 AM
1

Best to make it an 18yo girl just to be safe.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 11:53 AM
-2

Irrelevant. Zippo specifically was talking about a guy moving in with a 17 year old, and even if we talk about that specific post the guy still didn't have a thing for her until she was 17. Either way nobody was claiming men have a thing for 12 year olds, so it's a strawman for Novadina to pretend as tho Zippo was.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 11:49 AM
1

Because your ideal woman isn't even a person And how is that 'depressing'?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 11:13 AM
0

I mean so long as they don't get her pregnant I don't see what the issue is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 11:09 AM
1

are you aware that daughters are not eternally prepubescent children are you aware that eventually they grow into women with tits and ass etc
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 10:51 AM
3

Yea I mean I imagine it's tough having a hot daughter. Dunno how dudes handle that tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 08:54 AM
4

You think all men will just have a thing for any 12-17 year old girl they know? He said 17, not "12-17". 12 is barely post-pubescent (if at all). 17 is firmly post-pubescent. There is a huge difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 08:48 AM
0

something you know is an artificial construct who is simply executing their programming work? That is not meaningfully different to what humans are. Our programming is simply a product of hundreds of thousands of years of evolution rather than a human construct. And this fact does not make me desire love from women any less. I mean technically we already have "female" romance/love-oriented chat bots. There's your unconditional love, why aren't you using it? Because they an extremely poor simulat…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 08:39 AM
1

I'm saying that I don't desire the love of a dog, thus there is no reason for me to get a dog.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 08:26 AM
17

Oh, how terrible it must be for her that she has an endless line of men who want to have sex with her. I cannot fathom a worse experience. Truly women oppressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 02:46 AM
1

Right, but why is that 'depressing'?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 02:33 AM
3

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 02:19 AM
2

I do not desire the love of a dog, I desire the love of a human female that I find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 01:57 AM
2

It is not hypocritical to want something from someone that you cannot give back. If I was criticizing women for not giving me unconditional love, then that would be hypocritical. But I am not doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 01:27 AM
1

Well the difference would be that sex slaves are not living fulfilling lives and are thus hugely immoral, unlike Joi who is programmed to want for nothing more than to love and serve a man, and thus the only moral thing to do is to give her one.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 01:25 AM
3

Thanks. Like I said, I pray that I live to see the day that we finally invent women that are capable of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 01:19 AM
3

What's so great about unconditional love? You don't have to worry about it going away. What's appealing about Joi? She is totally unconditionally devoted to K (the main character) and exists for no other reason than to love and serve him. She also looks like Ana de Armas.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 01:17 AM
1

No. I am not capable of unconditional love. I still want it from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 01:09 AM
13

I happen to be on the autism spectrum You are an extreme outlier. Only about 2.5% of the population is on the autism spectrum. If a man is in the bottom 2.5% of physical attractiveness, he would have even more issues attracting women than you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 12:47 AM
5

CMV; Joi from Blade Runner 2049 is the ideal woman. I pray I live long enough to see the day that we can create robot women so that man may finally experience unconditional love.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 12:25 AM
12

That ain’t women’s fault Discussing female nature =/= claiming women are at fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 04:05 PM
1

I preferred r/CuteFemaleCorpses over both of those. Sadly the Reddit Nazis pooped that party :(
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 03:08 PM
1

I was forced to perm my hair with smelly chemicals, stuff my feet into high-heeled shoes and exist on a perpetual diet in order to appear attractive to men. What an absolute privilege it was that there were actionable things you could do in order to be attractive. Incels do not have such priviliege; that is precisely what the complaint is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 03:06 PM
1

Bro, NONE of that is even attempting to prove 'A' (that people of similar attractiveness are the people someone finds most attractive), which you claimed is the case over time, and is what I am asking you to prove. Did you post that to try and show that 'A' is true over time or do you no longer believe 'A' is true over time??
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 02:03 PM
1

Yes, thank you for summarizing why I said your request was silly. Then you said it IS your claim: but then evolves into A over time in LTRs So who me where in your evidence it says that is the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 01:40 PM
1

Point me to exactly the parts of those two documents that show that people find people of their own attractiveness level more attractive than they do people above their attractiveness level. This is what I asked you to show me. Then you said that wasn't your claim; Why would I do that when that isn't what I said? Now you are saying it is your claim; but then evolves into A over time in LTRs Make your mind up. Seriously this isn't hard. It apparently is for you. You can't even decide what you bel…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 01:17 PM
2

Oh my God, I am going to go postal if I have to see one more bluepiller move the goalposts after being corrected on their nonsense. Answer this definitively. Do you think people date others of their own attractiveness level because: a) Those are the people they are most attracted to. or b) Those are the best they can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 01:01 PM
3

The science-based kind of "blue pill nonsense" [1] [2] Point me to exactly the parts of those two documents that show that people find people of their own attractiveness level more attractive than they do people above their attractiveness level. Your claim is self-contradictory. If people found others of their own attractiveness level the most attractive, there'd be no such thing as an attractiveness level in the first place. Your claim defies logic and isn't supported by those two documents (if…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 12:12 PM
1

apparently a lot of them don't. On behalf of all incels, I apologize for giving you that impression. We shall work harder to ensure this does not happen again.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 10:27 AM
6

"Just wait 18 years bro"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 04:37 AM
5

The shallowness of women is the most abundant entity in the universe.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 03:34 AM
5

It's an obvious, unconscious thing. Why the fuck would anyone bother reviewing an hour-long movie of people living their lives to "confirm" this? Because it is apparently not obvious to everyone, as evidenced by how often the utterly deranged phrase "lOoKs ArE sUbJeCtIvE" is posted all over the internet. People are attracted to people roughly in their "league." What bluepilled nonsense is this? No, people settle for people in their league, because that is the best they can get in a monogamous so…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 03:32 AM
1

Thank you for your sanity. Terrifyingly, it seems many women do not share your feelings on this matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 02:38 AM
1

Apparently quite a lot of people, horrifyingly. I've posted two questions on this topic here today and I feel a little traumatized by the responses. I hope to God that if I ever get a girlfriend, it is not one of the ones that insists on using condoms. Christ, dating is an absolute minefield.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 02:14 AM
5

I don't get the looksmatch thing at all You don't 'get' it? What's not to get? It simply means two people who are equally good-looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 02:03 AM
1

Q4 People in exclusive relationships; Do you use condoms?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 09:36 PM
4

Graduation ceremonies are a bunch of nonsense. He missed out on nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 09:03 PM
6

Repeal it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 09:00 PM
0

Do you at least let him nut in your mouth?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 04:32 PM
2

I am shocked that this is considered a wild question. I was under the impression that most couples stopped using condoms once they were exclusive. Honestly, I don't know why women would even want a man to wear condoms. Do these women even want sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 03:42 PM
1

It’s similar for people in my social circle. Thx for this lifefuel. The other responses have depressed me :(
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 03:23 PM
1

Oh woops
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 03:21 PM
-1

Yes this is my feeling also. The other responses here are quite disheartening. I thought it was normal for an exclusive couple to stop using condoms? I would be devastated if I got into a relationship and the girl insisted on still using condoms (nevermind after MARRYING a woman ffs).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 03:03 PM
1

Yes if my life circumstance was such that I could disappear to Brazil for a week or two without anybody in my social circle finding out. I have a latina fetish and apparently hookers in Brazil are cheap af, plus doing it in another country (particularly a poor one) means you can creampie without having to worry about them tracking you down if they get pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 02:45 PM
1

Q4All; In an exclusive relationship, is it fair for the woman to make the man wear a condom for sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 02:27 PM
4

However, it’s about 50/50 for cause - part of what makes someone sexually undesirable is their personality Spoken like someone born in the 20th century.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 02:24 PM
82

The 'hate' ultimately stems from the disgust men feel toward the idea of raising another man's child.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 01:42 AM
3

Where were those 40 yo married women when I was 15 ffs!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 01:58 AM
3

Because it costs a male very little to nut in a woman. So males evolved to find any somewhat healthy post-pubescent pre-menopausal female at least fuckable.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 03:14 AM
1

No, everyone literally understands this. The 'Chad only' subtext has been and always will be painstakingly clear. This statement is pure down's syndrome. Women here foam at the mouth trying to insist that they're not interested in "Chad".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 09:09 PM
5

a crap personality Couldn't help yourself, could ya
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 09:02 PM
2

A fellow man of culture. Good to see :)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 08:33 PM
1

Because people are largely generic stereotypes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 09:41 PM
1

Repeal it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 09:31 PM
1

??? wtf is the point of dating women if you don't want sex??
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 07:01 PM
1

Sure, insofar as rape is a property of male nature, it disgusts me. But rape is not particularly a property of male nature, given that only a small minority of men rape, unlike female sexual selectivity, which is a property of virtually all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 07:55 PM
1

Yes as I've said all along it's female nature that disgusts me. I'm not saying women are responsible for their own nature. I'm saying the nature of women disgusts me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 07:27 PM
1

Just because you consider a guy "at least average" does not mean every woman will be attracted to that man. Yes, but there's gonna be 100 other average men also willing to fuck her. If she doesn't find any one of those 100 average men attractive, then her sexlessness is far more the result of her own selectivity than her lack of men willing to fuck her. The reverse is true of men. If sexless men had even 1 average woman willing to fuck them, they would likely be happy with that. If they had 100 …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 07:20 PM
1

But maybe not the men they're attracted to. What? Virtually all women can find an at least average guy to fuck her.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 07:10 PM
1

Because my personal wants and standards and whatever else are utterly irrelevant, as I am just one person. 99.9% of the women I wouldn't personally fuck are completely able to get sex from other men, because male sexuality his highly variable and much easier to arouse. If those women were unable to find sex with any man for the entirety of their youths as bald young men often are, then I would be similarly disgusted by male sexuality. But that is not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 07:01 PM
1

I literally do not give a shit whose problem it is or who may or may not be entitled to sex. Those things have no bearing whatsoever on how much suffering is experienced by men who live without sex for the formative years of their life. What disgusts me is the amount of men who experience that particular suffering, and them experiencing it is a direct result of women's sexuality being extremely fickle and unforgiving (in comparison to men's sexuality) of many physical traits. Thus I am disgusted…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 06:42 PM
1

Are you also disgusted by the nature of men for not finding certain traits of women sexually attractive? Yes, but to a far lesser degree, because that percentage of women is miniscule in comparison to the percentage of men who have that experience. For every one woman who is unable to find an at least average partner to have sex with her in her youth, I would estimate there is at least 100 men who are unable to find it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 06:22 PM
1

I don't think men are entitled to sex, nor do I give a shit whether they are or not. A sexless youth induces exactly as much suffering regardless of whether men deserve sex or not. What disgusts me is the nature of women, not women's choices. I am disgusted by the fact that women find baldness so unattractive that it renders a man sexless for the entirety of his youth.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 10:52 AM
5

Repeal it. /thread
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 08:30 AM
2

The definition of 'shallow' is a red herring. The issue is claiming women don't need looks as much as men in order to be sexually attracted. This is incorrect. In fact they need it more. Sure, as a % of what women require in order to be sexually attracted, looks are less of a % than they are for men. But women need a whole lot more of everything than men in order to be sexually attracted. As an absolute measure, women require better looks of men than men require of women in order to be sexually …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 08:25 AM
0

It's the fact that mere baldness can completely deprive a man of sex in his youth that disgusts me. WRT "women don't deserve forgiveness"... well maybe I let my emotions get the better of me there lol. I take that back.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 07:22 AM
5

Misogyny is correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 07:56 PM
2

watch me all women complain anyway FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 04:15 PM
2

Women have nothing to complain about.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 02:53 PM
0

So how is someone entitled to women because they're balding? Where did I say that? Here are two non-contradictory statements; It enrages me that mere baldness completely deprives men of sex in their youth. Women are not obliged to have sex with bald men or any other kind of men. If you think there's a contradiction, show me it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 06:15 AM
1

A very bluepilled response.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 02:18 PM
5

There is no such thing as 'personality'.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 07:23 AM
1

They would only rather stay single so that they have the opportunity of finding someone who is actually attracted to them. If the binary choice between betabux or nothing was offered however, most men would pick betabux.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 07:21 AM
1

Elaborate please.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 07:11 AM
1

Yes, that is a post I made that is utterly logically consistent with the comment I just made.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 07:07 AM
3

Disgusting. It enrages me how mere baldness can completely rob a man of sex for the entirety of his youth. Women do not deserve forgiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 07:57 PM
-2

maybe because of my body men see me more as pump and dump material?? DM me a body pic and I can verify whether or not this is the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 09:58 AM
1

If that qualifies as rape, then rape is not something particularly worth avoiding.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 04:58 AM
6

Women want to reframe feigning interest in a relationship to get sex as a form of rape. That's all this is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 07:36 AM
1

Idk about "smoke show"...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 07:32 AM
2

Pickmeisha, aka the ideal wife, amirite
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 10:31 AM
11

I don't disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 07:37 AM
9

Firstly, no I didn't. Secondly, yes, you can have believed that looks matter and still feel lied to about the importance of looks because you were not aware of the degree to which they are important. The strawman I was pointing out in that comment was BPers acting as though RP claim "I thought looks didn't matter", which virtually no RP man claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 06:40 AM
33

I'm including status as part of attraction in that statement. If we were considering solely looks, then the attraction men have to 50th percentile women would be about equal to the attraction women have for 90th or 95th percentile men or something like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 06:28 AM
54

People really need to stop with this strawman. Virtually no RP man was ever under the impression that looks outright didn't matter. It's how much higher women's standards are for looks than men's when it comes to sexual attraction that men are not aware of. Men will think that because they find basically any healthy weight, non-ugly woman attractive that women feel the same way toward men. They do not realise that women are only physically attracted to a tiny % of the male population.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 06:04 AM
8

Fookin' based, mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 05:55 AM
95

Hypergamy is the main one that men will be oblivious of. Most normie men are under the impression that an average man and an average woman would be about equally attracted to each other. In reality, the attraction men have to 50th percentile women is about equal to the attraction women have for an 80th percentile man.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 05:54 AM
0

Yup, men are pretty honest about their nature. Women not so much, even to themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 05:44 AM
0

"men"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 04:24 AM
-5

Titless or assless women. I am not even sure why these women exist. What purpose do they serve? I cannot think of one.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 03:15 AM
1

All women are shallow if they don't have non-committal sex with below average dudes. Unironically correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 03:00 AM
2

My Tinder has a bug where it only matches me with bots and fat women. Has anyone else had this issue and know how to fix it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 02:12 AM
1

Trick question; the female orgasm doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 02:05 AM
1

How is it "doing just fine" to be dating an ugly women? If your only option is ugly women, then you're doing pretty bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 10:35 PM
1

No, but that doesn't mean they're "doing fine". Ugly men aren't miraculously more attracted to ugly women just because they're ugly themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 04:29 AM
2

Plenty of below average men are doing fine. No, they're dating ugly women. That is not "doing fine".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/21 09:26 AM
1

Of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/21 09:52 PM
3

There is no meaningful difference between aborting at 24 weeks and aborting right before birth, or even aborting for some period after birth. As such, I am in favor of both pre- and post- birth abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/21 04:31 PM
8

It is not mathematically possible to structure society in such a way that every man gets to live the life of Chad, unless you want to do something like controlling the sex ratio to be something like 3-4 females for every 1 male. Obviously though, that would be massively detrimental to the society's ability to compete with other societies. Socially enforced monogamy is the optimal middle ground between maximizing the survival of a society and maximizing it's individuals' well-being.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 06:23 PM
21

I didn't say all men. The question was specifically about men who don't find much value in the relationship beyond the sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 05:16 PM
24

the unattractive misogynistic ones Just unattractive, you mean. Misogyny has no bearing on a man's ability to get a fuck buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 04:44 PM
93

Many men probably would prefer to just have fuck buddies, but can't actually get that. Thus they have to choose between sex in the context of a relationship or no sex at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 03:04 PM
7

You’re fucking up their “all married men are betas married to women who wish they were fucking someone else so those grapes are sour anyway” narrative. You mean like OP?: Most people, unfortunately, end up with the most convenient person, not the right person, regardless of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 11:12 AM
1

The Force Awakens. Ruined Star Wars.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 11:01 AM
13

"Everyone on PPD is crazy." - Everyone on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/21 03:47 PM
1

FYP = For You Page. The 'For You' page on TikTok is basically a bunch of TikToks that their algorithm thinks you'll find interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/21 12:13 AM
7

I think this post is more made as a response to women complaining about men "creepily" approaching, rather than OP personally having much of a problem with coming off creepy. If you think he should just ignore those complaints from women, great! But lots of other women would disagree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 03:40 PM
32

Become morbidly obese. Then they'll stop being attracted to you lol. The real answer is that anything you do to become more attractive to higher value men is going to make you more attractive to lower value men. You can't attract one and not the other. You just gotta deal with it. I'm not sure why this would be hard to deal with in the first place though. Just reject the ones you don't want.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 06:12 PM
108

It's a little different, because 'ugly hot' basically means somebody who has traits that are very above average and other traits that are very below average at the same time. Rami Malek is a good example of this. He has a great jawline, but his cheekbones are recessed into oblivion (which is what gives him buggy eyes). A conventionally attractive person wouldn't have any severely unattractive traits like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 12:43 PM
1

Who's doing that?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 09:39 AM
2

So long as she stays hot, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 09:38 AM
1

It's not common, but it's certainly not unheard of. My 52 year old coworker is the envy of all his friends due to his ability to exclusively date 20 year old women. As a blackpiller I was shocked by this given how he looks, but it is apparently not as hard to pull off as the women here would like to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 06:14 AM
-2

You said that my comment was like a lookism post. Was that not the intention of your reply to me? If it was, how is my comment like a lookism post if yours is not?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 09:40 PM
0

How does any of what I said sound like something from a lookism forum? Pointing out that looks matter is equivalent to a lookism forum post now?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 09:33 PM
0

Honestly, you're of a different generation. Young women nowadays are extraordinarily shallow. Very, very few young women today wouldn't find baldness a dealbreaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 08:46 PM
0

If my SO were to start balding I wouldn't care as much because I love him Honestly, I call bs on this. I think you would lose exactly as much attraction as if he wasn't your SO. You just don't like the idea of losing attraction to someone you're already invested in (particularly for something that you would likely get judged as shallow for), so you'd try to rationalize yourself into being attracted to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 08:40 PM
2

Naming names would probably violate Rule 8 unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 08:18 PM
10

I think the time has come to ban all boomers from this subreddit. They are not relevant to modern dating and are out of touch with the reality of it. They serve no purpose here and we should get rid of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 08:11 PM
2

You and I both know they are not worth a million dollars. Don't kid yourself. What's the real price?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/21 07:58 AM
1

How much?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/21 06:40 AM
3

Pics or didn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/21 06:18 AM
1

Whether or not I or anyone else is entitled to sex has no bearing either way on whether or not a sexlessness epidemic exists. What a complete non-sequitur.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 05:47 AM
8

There is no real incel problem in PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 06:02 PM
6

Since we're English speakers, let's look at UK, US, Australia. USA has the highest estimate with of men who use hookers at 20%. 70% - 20% = 50% of young men are having sex without the need of a hooker. I cannot believe you think that is an argument against the existence of a sexlessness epidemic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 05:51 PM
1

Alien 3 Assembly Cut > Alien & Aliens.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/21 02:41 PM
6

Some of them are ready to settle for anyone who would "give" them sex and that's just pathetic. Not really, given our desire for sex. If a man would be objectively happier with just any woman who'll give him sex over being alone, then it is still wise for him to choose that if those are his only two options. Do you feel it is pathetic for a person to choose the best of their options?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 08:48 AM
2

Cooming to porn. I have no other hobbies.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 07:11 AM
4

Physically attractive to me. Loves sex. Plays video games. That's it. She doesn't even have to have the ability to speak. Any woman who meets those standards is my ideal GF.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 07:09 AM
3

Why should all women take literally any man? So that men can get sex easily. How is that realistic? Of course it's not realistic; hypergamy exists. What are you even talking about? You seemed to understand what I was talking about just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 07:06 AM
3

Finally, a nonhypergamous female. All women's standards should be like yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 06:45 AM
3

I wonder how much of that is sexual attraction vs emotional attraction. Certainly, a woman acting a certain way can affect how 'attracted' to her I am in the sense that it will affect how much I want to spend time with her or date her. I can even feel a kind of 'swooning' because of it. But it has no affect at all on how much I'd like to feel up her tits (for example). How much I want to feel up a woman's body is solely defined by the shape/form of her body.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/21 05:33 AM
1

Lmao, that is not at all what the colloquial meaning of "hot" is. At all. To neither men or women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 11:41 PM
3

Potato IQ shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 01:07 PM
1

Science and anecdotal observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 11:29 PM
4

The evidence for my claim is what I observed in college and what other men have told me they observed in college. Sure my statement might've been an exaggeration, but not massively. At least at the college I went to, there was a small handful of men who engaged in casual sex with a far larger portion of women. Those women wouldn't have kept fucking them if all those things you mentioned were as much of a disincentive as you claim they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 01:53 AM
1

I coom to porn five times a day minimum.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 01:35 AM
-1

If any of that were true, women wouldn't be opening their legs to Chad's creampie every chance they get. But they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 01:32 AM
17

I would bet that when a man cheats, it does not signify that he no longer loves his partner, but when a woman does it, it does signify that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 01:58 PM
2

Thank you for your insight. I don't think anybody else could've gleaned from my comment the fact that I agree with her. Only you were able to read "I actually agree with her" and come to the conclusion that I agree with her. Please spare some IQ for the rest of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 08:14 AM
3

You must've realized that girls are less visual, right? I agree they're less visual, but not by much. even if he doesn't have model-tier looks. You weren't talking about guys who merely "don't have model-tier looks". You literally said ugly men. In fact, the fact that you're now changing it to "don't have model-tier looks" is confirming my original point that when women say "ugly", they really do just mean average non model-tier guys lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 07:57 AM
1

Yes. I literally just said that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 07:53 AM
1

And no, men can get raped by a woman. Tell that to the woman I replied to. I actually agree with her. Men can't rape women (or at least, female-on-male unconsensual sex shouldn't carry the same name as male-on-female unconsensual sex).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 07:42 AM
3

Absolutely. But we were never questioning whether or not men ignore looks for personality, status and game; ofc they don't. I fully admit the only reason those men are with those women is because they can't do any better. We were questioning whether or not women ignore looks for personality, status and game, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 07:27 AM
5

Yes, but it is not even remotely as common knowledge as women's, so with regards to how much men are pressured into having kids, it isn't relevant. The average person is under the impression that men can pump kids into women until whatever age their dicks stop cooming. They'll have a vague sense that old man sperm is probably not great, but they absolutely do not think that 40 yo men are significantly less fertile than 30 yo men (regardless of whether they actually are or not).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 06:56 AM
34

Everyone is pressured into having kids. Not only does society pedestalize parenthood as the most meaningful experience available to a person, but childfree people are also lambasted as selfish, immature and patronizingly made to feel as though they're missing out on the greatest thing life has to offer. Though obviously, men are not as pressured into it as women given that women do have a biological clock (and the deterioration of male sperm as men age is not anywhere near as common knowledge as…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 06:41 AM
3

Right, so...that's why you don't see it I don't see who has sex with who now, because I'm not regularly in a large mixed gender social group. But I was 3 years ago when I was in college, and I assure you there were no ugly men getting laid outside relationships with their looksmatches. And that is NOT a case of women ignoring looks for personality, game and status. That's a case of women ignoring looks because they have no better options. If those women could've gotten better looking men, they w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 06:06 AM
1

So you agree with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 06:00 AM
3

A woman can kill or physically harm a man fairly easy if she just has a knife or some other type of weapon. And whilst a woman can't rape a man, she can accuse him of raping her; the effects of which are just as harmful as rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 05:52 AM
3

I said it is as trauma inducing. Of course sexlessness is not as bad in other regards. For example, it is not a grave infringement of one's personal liberty as rape is. But I do believe they carry the same level of trauma (likely even more). This claim really should not be so controversial. The whole reason women evolved to find rape traumatic is because it is massively detrimental to their reproductive success to have to spend a reproductive opportunity on a man they didn't select (which obviou…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 05:02 AM
10

A peculiar PPD phenomenon; women denying that they experience X disadvantage in dating every time a man suggests that they do whilst simultaneously claiming that women experience just as much disadvantages in dating as men do. It doesn't add up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 04:44 AM
2

Not particularly. I have one male friend at the moment. To be honest, given the context that women rate the average man a 2.8/10, your claim that you have friends who've banged ugly men is not so egregious. The word "ugly" just has different meaning to me than it does to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 04:32 AM
2

Eh, I have friends who've banged ugly guys because something about them/their personality/their connection etc turned them on WHERE are these women. They don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 02:57 AM
3

They are comparable in at least one regard, being that they are both natural. If women don't like that fact being brought up, perhaps they should stop fallaciously trying to justify their behavior with "it's natural".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 09:15 PM
3

Women do like to be beaten. By Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 06:01 PM
2

You honestly believe that asshole men aren't able to get women?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 05:56 PM
18

Incorrect. If a woman is with a man who doesn't inspire her to want to have fun with him yet remains with him regardless, then she has indeed decided that her fun days are over.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 05:52 PM
32

The two main ways I would like society to address it; Stop shaming/mocking sexless men on the basis of their lack of sexual success. Stop gaslighting sexless men by insisting that their sexlessness is merely a result of their personality (or more obnoxiously, their "misogyny" or something similar). Or, if you don't want to do that, don't whine when sexless men complain about the fact that you don't and don't whine when the occasional sexless man shoots up a yoga studio. Or, do whine about it, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/21 05:06 PM
1

Furthermore, what 'issues' to women face that we could even "erase"? They don't have any fucking real issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:24 PM
13

stop whining No.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/21 04:39 AM
2

Swan, are you saying you would pump n dump me? Well, are you saying you'd only have sex with me under the expectation of a committed relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 12:22 AM
3

Tell us how you really feel bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 11:18 PM
2

I look forward to it!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 08:37 PM
5

Please tell this to all the people who incessantly whine every time a dude shoots up a yoga studio or drives a truck into a crowd. They seem to never shut the fuck up about incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 08:16 PM
1

You could choose to just not... That is exactly as dumb as asking women to just choose to not get raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 07:49 PM
1

Wanting to genocide a whole population implies you hate them Nah not really. if you were indifferent towards them you would ignore them. Are indifference and hatred the only two possible ways a person can feel about a group of people? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 05:52 AM
-1

If a woman sees a short or a balding or an ugly guy she feels a visceral disgust, a complete repulsion - she just doesent view him as human. If women could kill all short and ugly men in concentration camps they would do it without any thought or remorse. 0 empathy. Nowhere in this statement is the claim made that women hate such men. Feeling disgust/repulsion towards someone, viewing them as subhuman and having and the desire to exterminate them =/= hating them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 04:34 AM
-1

There's a reason men who have had sex tend to disagree with posts like this. It's not the magical healing potion that will transform you into a happy, productive normie sexless men wish it is. Such shockingly poor reasoning. Having clean drinking water isn't going to transform you into a happy, productive normie either, but living without it for your entire life is utterly, utterly detrimental.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 07:59 PM
6

No, incels are not upset that "looks matter to people". Incels are upset that; Looks determine the majority of sexual attractiveness. Looks are extremely non-subjective. Looks are almost entirely dependent on genetics and can't be improved much.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 02:56 AM
8

the vast, vast majority of people are average looking, so the difference is in personality. Such an offensively incorrect statement, and such a common misconception. Even if we look at weight alone, statistically speaking about a third of the population is obese, another third is just overweight, and a final third is a healthy weight (with a tiny % being unhealthily underweight). That means the difference between the 33rd percentile person and the 67th percentile person is the difference between…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 11:35 AM
1

Which is not how women primarily vet men - looks are a threshold, not the entire judgement LOL. Yet miraculously the vast majority of couples are looksmatched.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 10:42 AM
39

LOL @ pretending personality has a huge effect on women's attraction to a man either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/20 03:50 PM
3

Lmao what a fucking joke. Spends the entire video lambasting incels for obsessing over skull shapes, then later gets facial feminization surgery herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 02:25 PM
2

If that was true, then it wouldn't be the case that the men that get sex the most and with the hottest women (ie women with the most options) is men with Chadly facial structures. But it is the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 02:21 PM
2

A person who has good thoughts cannot ever be ugly. You can have a wonky nose and a crooked mouth and a double chin and stick-out teeth, but if you have good thoughts they will shine out of your face like sunbeams and you will always look lovely. This quote is outrageously bluepilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 03:00 AM
7

It is of paramount importance that we dispel the myth that the privilege women enjoy in the SMP over men is merely that "old creeps" hit on them. No. Women are also hit on by average men, and even above average men, even when they are not above average themselves. Whilst it may be true that women's extreme hypergamy often means even the average/above-average men are not true options to them, women end up settling down with such men eventually, so either women are en-masse settling down with men …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 03:14 AM
3

Daron has absolutely smashed some poon since SOAD became big; I'm sure that on rare occasion, he did. The far more common experience for him though would've been groupies visibly dreading getting stuck with "the ugly one", their discomfort when they were, and no doubt hundreds of embarrassing public rejections when female fans simply couldn't stomach his face. He was also even married at one point. However, if you look at the woman he married (a comically stereotypical early 2000s bimbo), this i…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 02:40 AM
2

Daron Malakian from System of a Down. It's actually quite sad. There was a lot of drama that occurred between Daron and the other band members —supposed creative differences and power struggles. However, armed with the wisdom of the blackpill, it was plainly obvious to me what the drama was really about when I read up on it. Daron founded SoaD and was their main songwriter, so he felt he was more responsible than his bandmates for the band's success. However, he is quite an ugly man, so obviousl…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 02:07 AM
11

Ironically, if Elliot Rodgers had survived his killing spree, he would have received more love letters in the next 72 hours than he would have in the entirety of the rest of his life had he chosen not to go on a killing spree.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 06:52 PM
1

Q4W; Is there any notable difference between the attractiveness of these two bodies, and if so, which do you prefer?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 01:54 AM
2

Wow, a high IQ comment from you for once! I agree, assholeness is not what women select for; looks are.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 01:43 AM
7

ITT: Lies.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 07:58 PM
10

We all know a woman who dates ugly or shitty men despite having many options. Not all women choose men rationally. Hold up there fella. Let's not too hastily discourage women with options from dating ugly men. I'd personally prefer that there was a lot more of that going on!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 09:38 PM
9

Unfortunately this does seem to be a big ask for the women of PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 04:37 PM
2

I've read/heard the term used quite often in evo-psych articles/podcasts on the topic. However, I'm aware there are multiple definitions, so that is why I added the clarification in my comment. May I ask that you respond to my comments with something more substantive in the future?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 04:26 PM
9

Our evolved aversion to cuckoldry developed over the tens of thousands of years of our species' evolution, 99.9% of which did not occur during the very abnormal environment of modern society. Whatever advantages/disadvantages there are to cuckoldry now have no effect on our evolved aversion to cuckoldry.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 04:17 PM
2

I'm more interested in whether or not the women here consider themselves to be part of an oppressed class on the basis of their gender. So, answer under whatever your definition of "oppressed class" is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 03:57 PM
2

Q4W; Do you believe it is accurate to say that women are still an oppressed class in 1st-world nations?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 01:10 PM
34

Males have an evolved aversion to cuckoldry (defined as; investing resources into offspring that aren't his), which is what step-fatherhood is. In terms of how it harms a male's reproductive success, cuckoldry is the male equivalent of rape. It isn't any more complicated than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 11:22 AM
1

No woman has ever rejected a man on the basis of incompetence, ever, in the history of humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 07:34 AM
16

I've noticed this. It's apparently perfectly fine to point out and mock the plight of a low-smv male, but the moment the low-smv male agrees, suddenly it's 'woe-is-me' and a bannable offense.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 07:04 AM
4

That image you linked of Donovan Sharpe is not bottom 20%. Wtf are you smoking?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 01:44 PM
1

Do you know how to join the server? You just gotta click this and it should just take you there https://discord.gg/XPRbrDW, then click 'accept invite'.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 03:31 PM
1

Sorta. It's like a collection of group chats, with each one having theme. There are some channels for debate, some channels for chatting about personal stuff, one for rating pictures, one for posting NSFW stuff. We also have group voice chats a lot. It's fun!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 09:31 PM
4

I've seen morbidly obese men with partners. Doesn't mean his partner finds him attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 09:14 PM
30

You won't get any answers from women. Women simply do not believe a man not having sex is an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 08:52 PM
3

Message to all the people who aren't on the PPD Discord: you should join the PPD Discord. It's way more fun than the sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 08:34 PM
3

We live in a monogamous society, so that means people generally have to settle for someone of equal value in the opposite sex. Those women dating ugly men are equally ugly themselves. Those women dating average men are equally average themselves. Etc. Just to be clear, you are not seeing women dating men uglier than themselves at a larger rate than men dating women uglier than themselves, because that is not statistically possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 04:35 PM
2

A looksmatch is just a person who is relatively equal in conventional attractiveness to another person. How is that a "false concept".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 03:11 PM
3

Some men have no other option. Or at least, their other options are hideous and thus far more of a boner killer than a woman who merely doesn't want to be there.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 03:02 PM
4

Absolutely. I've said before that if a gay conversion pill were to ever be invented, I would undoubtedly overdose on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 02:53 PM
1

Your posts here are golden, please don't stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 09:47 AM
2

What just-world-fallacy nonsense. Plenty of people don't get what they deserve or get what they don't deserve.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 09:37 AM
4

he’s a 4-5 Hypergamy confirmed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 09:30 AM
2

You wouldn't happen to have a link, would you? I need the ragefuel right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 02:39 PM
7

Maybe stop worrying about what sexless virgins think of you. It's a sign of insecurity that you care.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 10:10 AM
1

bih y u no poast int discord no mo
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 07:32 AM
2

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 07:21 AM
10

Pleasure. I don't care about "purpose". 25, male.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 12:22 AM
1

If I misread your statement and you don't believe there are more couples where the woman is more attractive than couples where the man is more attractive, then my bad, and I have no issue with what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 02:17 AM
2

No, my point is that most couples are looks matched, or have more attractive women So you think couples featuring more attractive women are more common than couples featuring more attractive men, which is exactly what I said your point was.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 02:02 AM
4

Yes, and your point was that that occurs far less frequently than couples featuring more attractive women, and my point was that that is not statistically possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 01:51 AM
5

Most couples even in the USA are either looks-matched or feature a more attractive woman. This is not possible. We live in a near-ubiquitously monogamous society. It is not statistically possible for there to be a larger number of either gender dating up than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 01:34 AM
1

If a man that is straight and single has an interaction with an attractive woman that he considers to be sexual harassment or even assault This is not possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 04:18 PM
4

You might as well call men having proportionally greater upper-body strength privilege. I would call that a privilege. However, I'm not massively invested in whether you call that a privilege or not. My point was that it is impossible for women to conceive that they live easier lives than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 08:42 PM
7

It's because it is impossible for women to conceive of themselves as more privileged than men, despite the fact that they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 08:36 PM
4

... Did you just reply to your own comment and not realize it was you?? LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 01:46 PM
2

Freak in the bedroom.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 12:05 AM
3

I'll say this: The vast majority of decently healthy post-pubescent pre-menopausal female humans are fuckable to me. Whether or not I would pursue a sexual relationship with them is another matter that depends on many more factors than just their fuckability, but their fuckability is a near certainty.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:39 PM
1

Just looked up her profile... purge seems to have broken her.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 07:25 PM
1

Nah I just have an ugly face.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 06:22 PM
4

He had zero social status. I'm not RP, so idk what exactly RP defines as 'status'. IMO though, the important kind of status is social status. And Elliot Rodger was at the absolute bottom of the totem pole when it comes to social status.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 01:37 PM
8

No wonder you're bluepilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 12:00 PM
6

Literally the worst piece of advice ever given.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 10:17 AM
8

Quit whining No.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 07:56 AM
2

Dat hourglass
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 10:59 PM
14

??? Is that supposed to be a pic of a guy who aged badly? He aged pretty well. Post Prince William or something if you wanna show a guy who hit the wall hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 08:30 PM
8

I didn't say she should.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 08:19 PM
15

I fully admit I don't want to date my looksmatch. It is very unlikely that I would find my looksmatch attractive, and I have no interest dating someone I don't find attractive. However, I don't understand the mental retardation that causes people to then conclude that incels only want to date 8+/10 Stacies. Are you aware that there is an huge gap between my looksmatch and Stacy? In that gap exists average women. In that gap exists most women. I would be more than happy to date an average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 08:16 PM
2

Is the link you posted a link to an image on your PPD server? If so, the people who can see it are likely people who are on your server.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 08:05 PM
1

You are very sex!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 07:51 PM
1

Post again. I wanna see!!!!!!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 07:23 PM
2

Big ass. Big titties.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 12:33 PM
3

Finally, someone I chinmog.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/20 09:44 PM
7

AWALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/20 09:21 PM
1

Zero. Zero percent of the reason he can't get laid is due to his desire to rape. Zero.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/20 02:08 PM
2

And you seemed to dodge the question. Is a man who gets sex via rape any more or less deserving of sex than a man who gets consensual sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 03:28 PM
2

If I rape women, my genes will 'make it'. Does that mean I deserved that sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 03:15 PM
1

Says who?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 11:41 AM
1

The idea that it's "transactional" to fuck someone out of love for them as a person rather than sheer physical lust is...weirdly false to me. Uh, I imagine most men would be disconcerted if they found out their wife has sex with them out of "love" and not lust.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 04:37 PM
2

Explain .
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 04:25 PM
1

Uh citation needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 04:52 AM
2

If you love your partner, you simply won't be capable of doing those things ??? Says who?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/20 08:36 PM
2

you can be conventionally ugly yet successful in relationships due to strength of character Incorrect. And ugly person can settle for another ugly person who is settling for them. That is not a 'successful relationship'.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/20 06:49 AM
4

The 5/10 women should only date 5/10 men, regardless if they have interest from a 7/10 guy (I don't like the rating system, but I'm using it here for example). I read "teach women not to want tall men!" "Hypergamy bad!" "Woman need to not be so shallow as to want a "chad" if it means the other guys will miss out." This is not even remotely the majority opinion of men on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 03:03 PM
2

I said decent, not nice, and yes, Patrice O'Neal had a decent enough face. His face was masculine.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 09:33 AM
3

That guy from TBBT is far closer to average than he is to being literally deformed. I don't think I actually disagree with you much. I just think that you have to look quite a fair bit better than merely not-deformed in order to be attractive to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 04:16 AM
4

The percentage of the population that is literally deformed is minuscule. I guarantee that if you looked at all the men whose looks are the reason they can't get laid, only a tiny fraction of them would be literally deformed. I believe you that you found not-good-looking men attractive. Average looking men. That's why I said 'decent' face, not 'hot' face.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 03:16 AM
8

No, a decent face is what is required to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 03:02 AM
1

How old are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 01:54 AM
3

I'm probably gonna die a virgin then given that my IQ is likely around 150 or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 01:49 AM
4

a relationship never fixes apparent problems This is an objectively untrue statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 01:47 AM
1

That's a revenge fantasy?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/20 11:56 AM
7

99% of men don’t struggle this much with social interaction. Lmao what? A sizable portion of young men (~30%) are getting nothing. Let alone casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 11:17 PM
4

Rarely do I see a gorgeous dude with an ugly chick, but the other way around? Alllll the time. No, you don't. You see gorgeous women with AVERAGE men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 11:14 PM
7

A woman he has no attraction to is not an option because he doesn't want that. Another man is not an option because he doesn't want that. A prostitute is not an option because he doesn't want that. Raping a woman is not an option because he doesn't want that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 11:10 PM
1

Both Boris Johnson and Steve Buscemi looked decent when they were younger, and that is relevant because the guy you replied to was clearly not referring to men who are 'ugly' as a result of being old. Everyone is ugly when they are old. It's a meaningless distinction. I guess you can claim that you are technically correct because the guy didn't literally specify that. But please be aware that you are completely missing his point.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 11:45 PM
1

Please, can you just fucking accept that you have no idea what an ugly man actually looks like. Boris Johnson was your idea of an ugly man. That is an AVERAGE man. Style, grooming, sTuDyInG bOdY lAnGuAgE helps AVERAGE men (men who YOU think are what 'ugly' is). IT DOESN'T HELP ACTUALLY UGLY MEN.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 11:13 PM
1

What planet have you been living on? I'd like to move there.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 09:51 PM
1

Do you think your "genes" are what make you attractive or not? Mostly, yes. I seriously don't know if you all are talking about people with noticeable deformities or what. ??? There is an enormous difference between Boris Johnson and a person with literal deformities. What exactly are you confused by?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 07:26 PM
2

Well sure if a guy is unattractive merely due to age then I'd agree charisma can help him because his genes are still good. But that probably wasn't the kind of guy the first commenter was referring to.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 05:01 PM
2

Sure he doesn't look great now, bc he's 56 years old ffs. That is just what average men look like when they're 56 years old. His sons are not going to be "very physically unattractive", which is what women care about. I'm not saying charisma is irrelevant for all men. It is relevant for average men. Just not for "very physically unattractive" men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 03:30 PM
1

This is what Boris Johnson looked like when he was younger. That is NOT "a very physically unattractive guy". That is no less than average (at least here in the UK). The fact that he is what comes to your mind as "a very physically unattractive guy" says everything. Actual physically unattractive guys (ie, bottom 20-30%) are not even on your radar.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 02:52 PM
5

Ugly is in the eye of the beholder. No it isn't. Everyone universally agrees on what is ugly. Hot is in the eye of the beholder. Ugly is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 02:29 PM
4

Twitter absolutely because it's easier to bully people there.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 03:39 PM
5

CMV: Bluepillers are more blackpilled than redpillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 01:28 PM
9

List the things men claim here that you think are the result of lack of experience or social skills/awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 02:40 AM
2

Sure, if your standards are low enough then you can probably find someone no matter what you look like. Doesn't mean you'll be sexually attracted to them though. Elliot Rodger probably could've got a girl that he was actually sexually attracted to, even if they weren't 'hot'. Most incels can not. I do concede though that there is a particular brand of fakecel who adopts the 'incel' label just because they can't get 'hot' women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 03:15 PM
11

He was a standardscel. Only wanted specific white blonde Stacies.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 02:56 PM
9

I am an olympic masturbator and it has not solved my issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 02:06 PM
1

Try the link in my original comment now.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 01:50 PM
1

This link takes you to a picture of a boat? https://imgur.com/r/streetwear/1VKyY
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 01:46 PM
1

I still don't get it. Pls explain...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 01:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter