TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RobDog101 Archive

View 43 posts and 1,253 comments by RobDog101 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1047

False AccusationRobDog101/r/MensRights21/05/21 01:20 AM
341

RobDog101/r/AntiFeminists19/06/21 08:54 PM
309

Legal RightsRobDog101/r/MensRights07/05/21 11:12 PM
270

RobDog101/r/AntiFeminists29/06/21 12:37 AM
127

RobDog101/r/AntiFeminists11/07/21 08:06 PM
68

RobDog101/r/MensRights30/01/16 11:26 PM
66

RobDog101/r/AntiFeminists20/05/21 05:02 AM
66

Social IssuesRobDog101/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:18 AM
64

MisandryRobDog101/r/AntiFeminists14/06/22 03:55 PM
56

RobDog101/r/AntiFeminists05/06/21 12:42 AM
52

False AccusationRobDog101/r/MensRights03/03/18 10:04 PM
50

RobDog101/r/AntiFeminists12/07/21 09:27 PM
49

Social IssuesRobDog101/r/MensRights25/07/18 08:27 PM
39

RobDog101/r/AntiFeminists27/06/21 04:45 AM
36

RobDog101/r/MensRights05/12/16 04:29 PM
29

Social IssuesRobDog101/r/MensRights05/04/16 03:19 AM
28

RobDog101/r/MensRights02/05/17 03:57 AM
26

MisandryRobDog101/r/AntiFeminists13/06/22 08:39 PM
20

RobDog101/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 10:10 PM
18

Social IssuesRobDog101/r/MensRights03/03/19 06:03 PM
17

Legal RightsRobDog101/r/MensRights04/06/18 05:25 PM
14

RobDog101/r/AntiFeminists15/05/21 11:30 PM
12

RobDog101/r/MensRights17/06/18 08:34 AM
12

RobDog101/r/MensRights19/03/16 04:13 AM
11

GeneralRobDog101/r/MensRights03/10/18 05:19 AM
9

RobDog101/r/MensRights23/04/16 06:25 PM
8

RobDog101/r/AntiFeminists11/06/21 09:51 PM
5

RobDog101/r/MensRights27/01/16 05:43 AM
4

Social IssuesRobDog101/r/MensRights07/06/18 08:03 AM
2

RobDog101/r/AntiFeminists13/05/21 06:34 AM
2

RobDog101/r/MensRights04/05/18 10:30 PM
1

FeminismRobDog101/r/MensRights19/06/21 08:58 PM
1

FeminismRobDog101/r/MensRights13/07/21 04:13 AM
1

FeminismRobDog101/r/MensRights23/05/21 12:53 AM
1

FeminismRobDog101/r/MensRights23/05/21 12:43 AM
1

RobDog101/r/MensRights11/01/17 03:44 PM
1

RobDog101/r/MensRights22/09/16 03:27 AM
1

FeminismRobDog101/r/MensRights22/05/21 09:13 AM
1

RobDog101/r/AntiFeminists20/06/21 11:00 PM
1

FeminismRobDog101/r/MensRights22/05/21 04:16 AM
0

RobDog101/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:42 PM
0

RobDog101/r/MensRights02/04/16 06:07 AM
0

RobDog101/r/AntiFeminists20/06/21 10:05 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,253 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Evolutionarily familiar aptitudes and indicators of mate fitness vs evolutionarily novel nerd stuff that’s basically witchcraft (hiss) which is traditionally female 😌
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 01:58 AM
-1

Oh and the claim that you need to “test drive” partners is ridiculous and without merit. Sex isn’t a skilled trade and a partner is not a car. But I would advise you not to pick someone who has had a lot of “drivers” or been in a lot of relationships
/r/MensRights22/07/22 05:18 AM
3

Wish I could honestly say there’s nothing to worry about. But maybe instead of being terrified you should just be extremely cautious. In any case, and in my opinion, you’re too young to worry that much about it right now. I’m actually glad I didn’t lose my virginity or even date till I was in my 20s. I should have held off longer if anything Focus on self-improvement for your own sake. Only date once you’re actually looking for a wife/life partner. Cultivate friendships. Resist the pressures of …
/r/MensRights22/07/22 05:10 AM
4

Why would you be “friends” with such a “person”?
/r/MensRights18/07/22 10:07 PM
11

Draft senators first
/r/MensRights17/07/22 11:07 PM
2

Sure, but still why would anyone care unless they want to date that person?
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 10:49 PM
7

It may be normal but it shouldn’t be. It’s something I definitely felt as a kid. The key to getting over it is realizing that the people who want boys to feel like that are bad people. Irredeemable in fact. They will never have the moral highground. They are ontologically evil and there is no action against them which is wrong so do what you want with that knowledge but stay safe!
/r/MensRights17/07/22 10:08 PM
3

Yeah nah, definitely don’t listen to this guy or anyone defending hookup culture OP. Meaningless sex isn’t going to do anything for you. Focus on self-improvement for your own sake
/r/MensRights17/07/22 10:04 PM
1

There are cultural and legal solutions or at least ways to mitigate the problems, but it’s become taboo to even acknowledge these solutions for the most part. Most men and women want unrestricted, consequence-free sexual liberty even if it’s bad for society.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 09:38 PM
5

I don’t understand why people get upset by other people’s standards. I mean it just makes them look like they want to date them and are upset they don’t meet their requirements. Anyway it’s not like single moms with nothing of value to offer men other than sex have a hard time getting matches on dating sites. If anything the average man’s standards are far too low
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 06:54 PM
0

Smaller doesn’t mean nonexistent. You have no evidence that that reflects natural human mate choice more closely than do other relationships. Women are consistently rated as more attractive the more neotenous their features are, in cross-cultural studies. Men aren’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:31 PM
1

Never heard of a gym other than PF having rules against grunting. Why would women be annoyed by men lifting heavy btw? Is it an inferiority complex thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 07:12 AM
33

One of my best friends got custody of his son when his ex wife tried unsuccessfully to falsely accuse him of molesting him. She coached the kid and everything. Aside from getting chewed out by the judge and losing custody there was no consequence for this, though. As his lawyer put it, if they prosecuted women for using that tactic, women’s prisons would be overcrowded. If it’s that common, you can imagine how often these evil women are successful. Plus many men have been assaulted and murdered …
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:28 AM
1

They do, but if too many of them did the ratio would be at least inverted. Plus religious women tend to be neurotic
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 03:54 AM
2

Sometimes. I only know like one real gymcel but this is something like all bodybuilders and fitness dudes I know joke about. Part of it is just that they can be really supportive of each other. Of course they can also be assholes to each other but most of this is all in good fun. There can be real drama surrounding gear use and accusations thereof, which are often if not usually accurate. It’s mostly just when obviously fake natties try to represent themselves as natural bodybuilding gurus which…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 11:39 PM
2

This is exactly the opposite of the case. Female promiscuity is strongly linked to chances of divorce (usually initiated by women). Women are supposed to pair bond, because sex is naturally more risky for them, so it requires more trust, and because they need the protection of a mate. Casual sex destroys their ability to form a connection with their mates. Also hookup culture has led directly to the problem of the modern “incel”, because chastity (mislabeled as celibacy) is now seen as abnormal,…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 10:51 PM
1

I kind of wonder in the case of marijuana how much of that has to do with weed/cannabinoid products being made way too strong for new/casual users to cater to hardcore potheads with ungodly tolerance tbh. Pot-induced anxiety used to at least be thought to be extremely rare but now it’s a common experience. Highly concentrated cannabis products are actually capable of causing heart disease and heart attacks now whereas this used to be unheard of. They’re even starting to grow trichomes by themsel…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 09:46 PM
2

Pretty much every guy in the fitness community knows there’s a lot of truth in this, as there are multiple jokes and memes about guys who start to work out hoping to attract female attention and then finding it’s only men who notice and complement them on their gains. But lifting for women isn’t the best motivation for a lot of reasons. Nobody who’s serious about fitness does it just to get laid/get dates. Anyway this isn’t universal either. Many women do of course appreciate fit, muscular men. …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 04:18 PM
1

how defensive *she got
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 04:13 AM
1

Western women have a serious self-awareness problem frankly. I’ve known so many women who would cry to heaven for vengeance if the wrong man made a pass at her, do the same shit to men that they hate men to do to them, even openly sexually assaulting them—me included. Or it would be seen as assault if the sexes were reversed This is especially true when they’re drunk and their inhibitions are down, and you can look at testimonies by male strippers who’ve worked bachelorette parties if you don’t …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 04:11 AM
1

That’s actually part of what I was referring to. “Incels” have obviously always existed (look into why we have about half as many male ancestors as female if you haven’t), but the current nature and extent of the problem is definitely a result of normalizing casual sex culture and virgin shaming—especially by women, I’ll add before anyone tries to say it’s primarily men shaming each other. In fact women are the primary enforcers of “gendered” shame. (As discussed here and here.) role in enforcin…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 03:42 AM
2

She might be right as the law is currently written but the point of an HOV/carpool lane is to be an express lane for cars carrying multiple people who could otherwise drive/be transported separately, and obviously an unborn child can’t be transported separately from its mother. These lanes are supposed to provide an incentive for drivers to carry passengers because it’s “greener”. So she may be technically correct but I suspect if anything this will just result in a slight clarification of the r…
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 01:52 PM
1

Well gender’s not real so
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 01:33 AM
1

Wasn’t sure at first but at this point I have very little doubt
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 11:19 PM
1

Like most women, you’re utterly incapable of understanding that sexual value is not always the most appropriate measure of value in all situations. In fact you seem completely unable to even process what you’ve read when confronted with the suggestion
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 10:19 PM
1

lol your attempt to identify a contradiction was so headassed it confirmed your lack of reading comprehension which makes it not worth addressing. You’re imagining things, love
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 10:09 PM
1

Woman logic moment. “I literally can’t not use sex to evaluate value so the only alternative I can think of to choosing the most fuckable himbo to lead society is to choose the exact opposite of him” It’s not your fault, really. It’s just a beautiful illustration of my point. Thank you for being so open about your lack of judgment outside the sexual sphere
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 10:01 PM
1

“Hey who do you think should control our nuclear arsenal?” “Hmm, I don’t know, let’s ask Rebecca who she’d most like to fuck!”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 09:44 PM
1

Ooh ooh, wait, let me guess, you think bonobos have the ideal social model and humans should be more like them and resolve/decide everything with sex 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 09:43 PM
1

This is exactly what I mean. You’re beyond help unless you choose to help yourself by stop being delusional. I literally never implied sexual selection isn’t fact or to be “opposed” (as opposed to recognized and mitigated); I literally called it natural. Just pointing that out to show everyone else how dishonest you’re being, not because I hope you’ll reread anything I’ve said but this time with your critical thinking glasses on
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 09:08 PM
57

If anything guys do it in middle school, when literally everybody is horrible, and later teens. It’s not normal male behavior past that and is almost never seen past their early 20s except in gay men (I should know). But it’s something the typical female never grows out of, even in old age
/r/MensRights09/07/22 09:04 PM
1

Oh I don’t complain. I want women to be more open and honest about their misandry
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 08:45 PM
1

Anyway you’re either a woman or a simp so I’m not gonna engage further as though there were any hope of saving you or making you accept reality that everybody either knows and accepts to be true or is willfully ignoring
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 08:38 PM
1

Sexual selection is the only type of selection they’re fit for so it bleeds into all their judgments, and it has no place in the workplace or in politics. The only thing keeping them from enacting negative eugenics (as their hero Margaret Sanger advocated) is lack of means and opportunity
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 08:36 PM
270

They’re delusional so they imagine men are always talking about their bodies behind their backs because women do that. So they think it’s some sort of payback. For something only they were ever doing in the first place
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:26 PM
1

I mean I think if the law requires women to take responsibility for their pregnancy then men should take responsibility too. That’s reasonable. However they should also have equal parental rights, not just responsibilities. And of course a paternity test should be required
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:25 PM
1

Stricter sexual division of labor and separation of male and female social spheres and formally and culturally enforced monogamy would be necessary to mitigate women’s natural eugenicist tendencies. I’ve seen women literally sabotage the livelihoods of men they find repulsive or conspire to get them fired purely because they got “bad vibes” from them, because the truth is they don’t want them in the gene pool at all and if given the power and opportunity they would straight up cull them. Men sho…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 02:42 PM
1

Women like these literally think that elves build and maintain the infrastructure of cities and countries and defend them
/r/MensRights02/07/22 02:52 AM
3

There’s a kernel of truth here but women have no right to claim to be innocent victims. Hookup culture has harmed both sexes equally, and only the “top” few percent of men and of women have been “liberated” by it: those who were held back only by basic morality from getting everything they wanted and everything they could take from others, without consequence
/r/MensRights29/06/22 05:35 AM
1

They’re selecting themselves out of the gene pool 🤷🏻‍♂️ Meanwhile I will be donating sperm to genetically cuckold them 🍵
/r/MensRights25/06/22 04:48 PM
44

This was the title given to this when it was crossposted in r/feminism. Literally nobody says “Boys will be boys” in this kind of situation. Plus I’ve seen probably far more videos of women assaulting cashiers and service workers like this than I have of men. Feminists have literally no clue what they’re talking about when they talk about men, how we’re socialized or how society views our actions and responsibilities
/r/AntiFeminists14/06/22 03:58 PM

I’m gonna delete this and try to repost it how I’d meant to because I didn’t do it right
/r/AntiFeminists14/06/22 03:45 PM

No, r/feminism had xposted this with a title like “This is what happens when you say ‘Boys will be boys’” of or something headass like that I just fucked up this post
/r/AntiFeminists14/06/22 03:43 PM
3

Actually since for some reason this is getting a halfway decent response I guess I’d just say go see where this was crossposted in that sub. It’s always hilarious to see what feminists think “boys will be boys” is supposed to mean I really wish this site weren’t such shit and they didn’t arbitrarily kneecap our options for linking posts from elsewhere with our own commentary in the OP
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/22 11:20 PM
5

Sorry I was trying to share the post from r/feminism. I guess I’ll delete this and go reflect on what a failure I am
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/22 11:14 PM
1

These women don’t breed tho and if they do they’re usually single mothers and their children, especially their sons, probably hate them. They are not the crusading reformers for a more just and fair future that their grandiose delusions suggest, because they have a vanishingly small stake in the future. I’ll bet good money if this woman has any children they’re not her husband’s. Might even bet on her husband having a cuckold fetish too
/r/AntiFeminists04/06/22 07:49 PM
2

It varies a lot more for men than for women because of starkly different standards of attractiveness for the sexes. A lot of men are more attractive at 50 than at 25. Some might even say it’s the norm. It’s unusual for women to become more desirable to most men after their 30s (maybe even just after 30). In most cases men who find older women more attractive can be reasonably classified as fetishists/paraphiliacs
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 01:21 AM
1

It’s not so much that men age slower but we age better. Part of this is for reasons you could think of as being “aging slower” like our skin not sagging and wrinkling as badly (assuming comparable skin care and general health and fitness routines) because our skin’s thicker. But mostly it’s because women’s faces are more neotenous and across all cultures female beauty is associated strongly with youthfulness (the reasons for which are another topic and don’t really matter here). In any case, ima…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 11:00 PM
1

Yeah we kinda always agreed on this topic, but it may be because we’re both men and don’t feel indebted to women for all the rights we’re given. He always called out the hypocrisy of ladies’ nights and women-only spaces, especially where there weren’t male equivalents, and especially when they were justified on the grounds of “equality”
/r/MensRights20/03/22 01:27 AM
4

That dumb bitch actually said “Oh my god what’s wrong with you?” Modern women I stg
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/22 04:50 PM
1

Hahahahahahaha Fuck I hate this site so fucking much
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 04:54 PM
2

She felt compelled to brag (super weak brag btw I can deadlift that for reps without warming up and without a belt and I’m not that serious a lifter) even though it did absolutely nothing for her argument and in fact weakened it (especially since she’s obviously well beyond drafting age). They have to make everything about themselves and how capable they supposedly are even when it doesn’t help them or anyone else
/r/MensRights25/02/22 04:47 AM
32

Breaking: Doctor Phil, a man who’s been exploiting the mentally ill for his modern-day freak show for twenty years, is an atrocious human being. Quelle shock !
/r/PussyPass24/02/22 06:52 PM
17

It’s always been equal rights without equal responsibilities
/r/MensRights24/02/22 03:59 PM
1

You want to be able to trust your psychologist as possible so if you should try to get one you’re comfortable with. Even if your misgivings are unfounded they will make it harder to open up and get the most out of therapy
/r/MensRights20/02/22 08:46 PM
0

Weak
/r/MensRights20/02/22 04:13 AM
3

Doesn’t change my point anyway
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:44 PM
6

They’re orbiters most of the time then. I use it pretty much interchangeably with simps. I don’t see how being allowed to sexually service the matriarch of your polycule makes them automatically not orbiters
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:44 PM
3

Anyway you could just use hyperandry and hopogyny if you want to be precise
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:42 PM
3

Idk I have been something of an incel ally and I was in an incel fb group where I saw a poll asking members what they attribute their inceldom to and the significant plurality selected neurodivergence
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:41 PM
3

I just wanna dock with the boys tbh
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:18 PM
7

That makes it sound like men control sexual selection, which is the assumption made by researchers who attribute this to men being “intimidated” by “powerful” women
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:17 PM
7

Polyamory or the Pareto principle? Most “polyamorous” relationships I see are one woman and multiple male orbiters
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:14 PM
1

They live in an alternate reality lol Hey wait isn’t that literally the definition of a delusion?
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:25 PM
1

If you can’t beat ‘em…
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 08:23 PM
79

It’s subscriber base overlaps heavily with subs like r/femcels. The blind leading the blind and fueling each other’s delusional power fantasies
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 04:35 AM
43

Fine. Women wouldn’t be able to maintain all the machinery and technology involved in artificial reproduction without males. They wouldn’t maintain the infrastructure required to transport raw materials and keep the power on. They wouldn’t have any individual incentive to pursue such technical knowledge and demanding manual labor if they could. Sanitation services would likewise crumble, and there would be no industrial-scale manufacturing of medicines including antibiotics and vaccines before l…
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 03:03 AM
3

You heard it here folks: asking consent is wrong. Don’t ask, just do it!
/r/MensRights11/02/22 02:52 AM
13

Psychologists pay lip service to the idea of distinguishing empathy from sympathy (or even agreeableness) but don’t in practice. If you look at the kinds of questions they write for assessments of empathy levels they’re actually just assessing the subject’s agreeableness/personableness, or how much they say they care about people’s feelings, not the actual ability to understand motives and normal emotional responses to situations, which is the literal meaning of empathy.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 02:54 PM
1

That’s absurd. Where would we get sons?
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/21 01:12 AM
3

Sounds a lot like not my problem
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/21 02:53 AM
3

I can’t see any man ever being so shameless and lacking self-respect and a sense of personal accountability, that he would pull this shit. It would be embarrassing. Basically just broadcasting that you have a drinking problem but feel your behavior is other people’s fault? Publicly exposing yourself as a sexually compulsive mess and a predator who entraps others by lying about your age? Basically admitting you’re a danger to yourself and the public? All while expecting sympathy as a self-styled …
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/21 03:29 AM
1

Lol did you see all the images
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/21 05:32 AM
1

Here is the article: https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/04/messages-of-shame-are-organized-around-gender/275322/
/r/MensRights13/07/21 04:14 AM
5

Thank you that was my own lol
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/21 10:14 PM
2

Oh and lest anyone say this isn’t representative of a real social phenomenon but just a small group of misogynists/guys who’ve gravitated to a fb group after having bad experiences with women: https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/04/messages-of-shame-are-organized-around-gender/275322/ https://www.mensjournal.com/health-fitness/straight-guys-now-prefer-bromance-over-romance-heres-why/
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/21 10:05 PM
2

Always the lack of examples lol. Same with another post from there I crossposted a while back where they were alleging that teenage girls are called “young women” when they commit a crime but teenage boys are called boys, or some shit like that. These people are literally delusional
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/21 09:33 PM
1

Yeah reading all that would be way too much emotional labor 😂 Do women ever shut the fuck up?
/r/MensRights03/07/21 09:34 PM
1

What? This is literally just a thing you ask people you care about. I text my male friends this all the time and vice versa. “Did you make it home ok?” is a fairly standard opener to the first phone conversation with someone after they were supposed to have gotten home from a trip. Feminist women really have no concept of other people huh? Like they literally assume by default that everything that happens to them never happens to anyone else, and the next assumption they make after someone disab…
/r/MensRights03/07/21 12:03 AM
6

I mean I don’t doubt you and it’s not an issue that affects me in any way. But it does seem like wearing a bra is more of an optional thing than it was like in the ‘50s and I don’t think most people would care as long as you’re not in a super sheer top/dress, and I wouldn’t see what the big deal was even in that case but I am gay so
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/21 04:19 AM
3

Any woman who complains about the concept of the friendzone is telling on herself. 100% chance she’s knowingly used men they knew wanted a relationship with by stringing them along so they’d keep doing shit for her and letting her vent when even her girlfriends get sick of hearing her shit. But I don’t really have much sympathy for those simps anyway. So proud of gen z for normalizing simp shaming tbh. It’s their greatest cultural achievement yet.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/21 12:09 AM
49

Only women have mental health problems because only women have minds. Apparently 🤨
/r/PussyPass23/06/21 05:50 AM
17

Yeah I’ve had to do all the work and organization in at least one group project where I was the only male. I got the impression the women sorta resented me taking charge but literally nothing was getting done otherwise. I’m aware of how diffusion of responsibility works so I chose not to let it affect me and we eventually got everything done with just a slight deadline extension. I really have to call mega bullshit on the “Let the female lead the group because she’s ‘bossy’” part of the OP. Peop…
/r/MensRights22/06/21 11:27 PM
6

Imagine not taking pride in your assets (well except having people take pity on you—that’s completely unearned) but instead feeling like a victim when someone appreciates them tho? Why are modern females
/r/MensRights22/06/21 09:43 PM
10

Ok but it’s not sexism against her I don’t get why you don’t get this
/r/MensRights22/06/21 09:40 PM
1

For instance, women are routinely denied custody of their children after being classified as “unfriendly” for asserting that the husband has abused them or their children. Lmao source?
/r/MensRights22/06/21 04:19 PM
8

I pray to whatever powers may be out there that we get a fucking in-group bias soon.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 08:14 PM
4

Feminists like to pretend that the norm is for women who injure their partners to do so in self-defense and then get the maximum punishment for assault because of it. It’s a big, weird world so I’m not saying that has never happened but the situation in the video is definitely much more common. In practice—in the vast majority of cases—domestic violence, even to the point of murder, is de facto legal for women. You can watch old episodes of COPS where they respond to domestic disturbances and fi…
/r/MensRights21/06/21 08:11 PM
2

Yes it’s extremely worrying to think of what kinds of mothers these women are
/r/AntiFeminists21/06/21 07:57 PM
1

Well you see they’re clearly victims because they cannot consent to whatever the consequences of their behavior will be and the alcohol forced itself on them because they were probably getting it for free from some simp
/r/AntiFeminists21/06/21 07:56 PM
38

Who says that insults primarily used by women against men are “patriarchal”? What sort of absurd reality are these women living in?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/21 07:43 AM
1

🅱️reddy 🅱️ased
/r/AntiFeminists21/06/21 05:28 AM
2

Being a straight man would be so scary ._.
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/21 10:18 PM
11

She literally called motherhood a patriarchal institution. There’s literally no point trying to reason with these people
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/21 10:09 PM
11

Lmao FDS doesn’t know what “in good faith” even means
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/21 07:53 PM
3

We need more intergenerational transmission of sexism tbh
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/21 06:52 PM
1

What about a blog then?
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/21 06:09 PM
2

So many nice things lost
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/21 05:01 PM
5

Men have always married down. I thought women wanted to prove their equality. So marry 👏 tha 👏 broke 👏 men 👏
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/21 05:00 PM
10

K. Sh
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/21 06:33 AM
15

“Oh she drinks only because she’s stressed” but “He drinks because he’s a terrible person trying to be more terrible for literally no reason”
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/21 05:54 AM
11

Publish anonymously
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/21 05:43 AM
11

Why/how did she talk you out of it?
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/21 04:10 AM
11

I don’t think I have to guess
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/21 01:46 AM
16

Well put.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/21 11:48 PM
10

It’s called ad hoc
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/21 09:27 PM
4

Garbage men have a higher mortality rate than cops and barely get any acknowledgment or appreciation. One thing you can do to show them appreciation is to get a small present to give them around gift-giving holidays. We usually get quiktrip gift cards and a sack of caramel corn or something like that.
/r/MensRights19/06/21 08:12 PM
1

I think that the fact he didn’t die on the scene is sufficient proof she wasn’t trying to beat him definitely to death but regardless, why would anyone make this their hill to die on? It kinda reminds me of the “Why didn’t they just shoot out the kneecaps/shoot the weapon out of their hands?” argument for deadly force being used to stop a potentially (as in highly probably) deadly (or crippling) assault. Some people watch too many movies/cop shows. You can look through my post history which incl…
/r/MensRights19/06/21 08:32 AM
0

Yes
/r/MensRights19/06/21 08:15 AM
1

How is this a men’s rights issue the dude deserved it you psychopaths
/r/MensRights18/06/21 06:39 PM
2

This
/r/MensRights18/06/21 04:40 PM
3

How would they know?
/r/MensRights18/06/21 04:40 PM
3

Penile cancer is relatively rare and has an extremely low fatality rate as cancers go
/r/MensRights18/06/21 04:03 PM
3

The cancer argument is absurd because more babies die per year from complications due to circumcision than would be saved even if it were 100% effective against penile cancer. Which it’s obviously not. The only man I’ve ever personally known to get cancer on his penis was circumcised, and he got it on the head of his penis which he’d previously chafed so badly he couldn’t jack off for like a month.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 04:02 PM
1

Idk it sounds like a pretty clear-cut case though. It was one of the rare (in the west at least, maybe not Zimbabwe) black-and-white cases of a stranger breaking into a woman’s house and attempting rape and nobody seems to disagree.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 03:59 PM
1

Lots of men also eliminate body hair, especially if they’re athletic/body builders, and lots of women find body hair gross. Are they pedophiles/wanting to attract pedophiles? As for it being more common for women, and men wanting smaller women, that’s the same reason women want taller men. It’s basic sexual dimorphism. Straight people usually go for people who are, in a lot of respects, sort of their opposites. If petite women are basically children in these people’s minds they are admitting wom…
/r/MensRights18/06/21 03:54 PM
4

Therapy is basically tailored to affluent suburban WASP women who naturally like to talk about themselves and don’t get enough of it with their girlfriends because even they get sick of hearing it, and anyone who would benefit from therapy doesn’t really need it. The proof of this is that all schools of therapy have basically identical “success” rates. You’re effectively paying someone to pretend to be your friend. (Could be an empathetic friend in the case of person-centered therapy, a tough-lo…
/r/AntiFeminists18/06/21 04:14 AM
32

Makes it worse tbh imo
/r/MensRights16/06/21 04:21 PM
2

Still a minority which is…really surprising. I would’ve thought a majority in all these countries would have said yes
/r/AntiFeminists16/06/21 04:20 PM
2

I know I’ve been on tik tok lmoa
/r/AntiFeminists15/06/21 01:16 AM
2

I mean it’s technically true but honestly what is her point? How is assuming something that is very-nearly-but-not-quite guaranteed to be the case “judging people”? If you really care that much that random people think you’re a virgin maybe don’t get pregnant
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/21 09:29 PM
1

We actually uhh do but thank you for your opinion insecure wxman
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/21 09:20 PM
43

The number of submissions crossposted here from that sub makes me feel simultaneously hopeful and kinda concerned like are the zoomers ok? Obviously the continued deterioration of relations between the sexes from generation to generation was inevitable and probably a necessary evil to wake young men up but it seems like there’s a lot of hostility. Like I said it’s kinda refreshing to see yet also kinda sad.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:04 PM
3

99% of men’s problems when it comes to communicating their feelings come from other people having a problem with men’s feelings. Society only sees men with problems as problems themselves, and women for the most part do not actually want a man who is vulnerable and sensitive and talks about his problems, even if they say they do. Women may want men in general to have these qualities, but they want more stoic men as partners and fathers of their children. It would be a dream come true for the typ…
/r/MensRights09/06/21 01:13 AM
2

I don’t know that I understand what you’re trying to say. But it’s not true that women in power have historically wielded it more fairly or peaceably. If anything it’s the opposite
/r/AntiFeminists07/06/21 10:18 PM
13

They also unironically think that men in power have historically cared about the needs of the man on the street, or that women in power are any more likely to care
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/21 02:32 AM
1

Oh ok that’s it
/r/MensRights05/06/21 12:37 AM
3

How do you find out what percentage upvoted it
/r/MensRights03/06/21 06:12 AM
4

People blame and demonize men for their own mental illnesses and hardships and then ask why they didn’t seek help before killing themselves 🧐
/r/MensRights31/05/21 01:40 AM
30

Yeah no way would claiming PTSD and bipolar and what not get a man off especially with how many incriminating things she told the police and how clear it was she lacked any remorse and would do it again. That is not how the insanity defense works. Except when it comes to women I guess.
/r/PussyPass25/05/21 07:28 PM
22

Man what a cringe take on how men think. Why would a man in a room full of women be excited, even assuming he’s straight? There’s not much of a chance that he’s getting any benefit out of it or is even there by his own volition. Probably somewhere his girlfriend dragged him. Or he’s working a bachelorette party (ugh). Do they really think the average woman’s company is enjoyable to the average man for its own sake?
/r/MensRights25/05/21 03:46 PM
3

just under 50% Which really means well over 50%. Plenty of evidence men are less likely to even recognize DV against them.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 03:41 PM
1

What makes you think that it’s not women who don’t want to work at that place?
/r/MensRights25/05/21 02:39 AM
1

Well, artificial scarcity is a thing but yeah so is the rampant ideological denial of non-cultural explanations for cross-cultural and even cross-species phenomena. I mean literally the most basic self-replicating molecules compete and absorb each other. Far from being the source of all conflict, the human ego is really the only thing that allows us to live in as peaceful and cooperative a society as we do.
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/21 10:24 PM
23

It’s not just that unattractive women are drawn to feminism. Feminism makes them absolute worst sense of fashion and personal presentation. Just google “before and after feminism” pictures. Saddest shit you’ve ever seen. It’s that “It’s everyone else’s standards that are wrong, not me” mentality. Makes people refuse to acknowledge the fact that the reason their aesthetic sensibilities aren’t the norm is because they are shitty. No it must be everyone else in the world being bigoted.
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/21 10:16 PM
2

Hmm you must be a woman
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/21 09:50 PM
1

She was admitting it was just because they were black men
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/21 03:53 PM
1

Reminder that the American military industrial complex is literally run by women but hey obviously that has nothing to do with exploiting men’s bodies and labor and lives
/r/FeminismStopsWhen24/05/21 02:00 PM
2

“Oppression Scholar” hahahahahaha
/r/FeminismStopsWhen24/05/21 01:53 PM
1

Those aren’t really compelling statistics, except for the child bride thing that’s not really relevant to my culture or my life. Aww they have to collect water? Lmao who cares simp
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/21 01:40 PM
1

Fuck that simp thinking. Oh yeah, not that this should really matter in this case but I think it might work on these people when all else fails: gay guys exist. Believe me. I have never remotely “enjoyed” being sexually assaulted/harassed by a female in my life.
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/21 01:28 PM
2

Ok. Good. Female supremacists should be scared. Men of the past were massive simps and cucks who threw their sons under the bus for an ideology and to get the rabid feminists off their case. They’re the actual generations of men that feminists claim to have a problem with, yet feminism does nothing to correct the supposed travesty of their inordinate formal power over women, and in fact only serves as one more ideology for woke corporate culture to capitalize on. Meanwhile boys growing up in the…
/r/MensRights24/05/21 01:02 PM
2

What? Is this a like film/tv reference or just you vastly overestimating women’s putative character judgment? That so-called “intuition”? That has a more accurate name: neurosis.
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/21 12:45 PM
2

They feel entitled to empathy from people they are freely admitting to viewing as some sort of monsters and meanwhile never consider that being treated like monsters by random women everywhere they go might legitimately be a source of negative social and mental-health problems for lots of perfectly innocent males. How narcissistic and just generally toxic do you have to be to think like this?
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/21 04:14 AM
8

I remember listening to a thing on NPR where a white woman talked about feeling guilty because she feels nervous when she sees black men while walking alone in public and has an impulse to cross the street and whoever the simp hosting the segment was was like “I mean, I kind of feel for her”
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/21 03:44 AM
2

How do so many women think this point is remotely ok to make and doesn’t make them look like horrible people? They actually think it will make men sympathetic to their “plight” if they call us monsters. Wow women have it so hard seeing monsters everywhere. Now imagine what it’s like to be treated like a monster constantly
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/21 03:35 AM
1

Jesus are the zoomers ok?
/r/MensRights24/05/21 12:12 AM
14

Wait did you only realize that in retrospect? I was always aware of it as a kid.
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/21 10:59 PM
1

A better way to say this would be that wetness is an emergent property of the interaction between liquids and solids so water by itself isn’t wet. But for practical purposes water is wet because when you touch it you become wet. That’s one sense in which the word “wet” is used, as evidenced by the fact that “Water is wet” is a common saying. But go off Neil deGrasse Tyson
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 06:50 PM
1

Water is not wet Wetness is the ability of a liquid to adhere to the surface of a solid First off are you saying water doesn’t adhere to the surface of a solid? Second it’s not really just the surface, is it. Not in the usual sense. There are absorbent solids. An object can be wet throughout.
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 06:46 PM
22

Just don’t have the wrong genes bro it ain’t hard (/s obviously)
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 05:46 PM
3

I have to say I didn’t come up with it but I think it should become a thing
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 05:45 PM
4

There ya go buddy! 😊
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 05:45 PM
9

Yes. Females Dying Single
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 05:27 PM
7

Why would you ever post or comment in Females Dying Single?
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 05:17 PM
2

That is so good
/r/MensRights22/05/21 04:10 AM
1

You really cannot let yourself care about every opinion on twitter. It’s self-care (as the sjws say)
/r/MensRights22/05/21 04:08 AM
1

lol you’re never gonna learn to be a man from Hollywood
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 04:02 AM
2

If women had the same abilities on average as men, they would immediately use them to cull the male half of the population. Not being high value would mean death for a man. You can tell by how (many) women talk that they already conflate being “unfuckable” with not deserving human rights and being worthy of death. (If you don’t think so just keep in mind that saying a man doesn’t deserve to be able to make a living is the same as saying he doesn’t deserve to live. Think about that from now on wh…
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 03:21 AM
2

This is the real reason men needed to evolve to be stronger than women: to protect themselves and others from the more violent sex.
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 03:16 AM
14

However I am actually kinda skeptical about the “high value” part of the title
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 03:13 AM
7

That’s why simps need to be patrolled.
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 03:12 AM
4

Yeah the link in the post pinned at the top of this sub says otherwise. Anyway I guess I’ll put this here: it was my comment on a post in r/mensrights asking how to counter this exact argument but for some reason the op was deleted shortly after it was posted: It’s an insanely asinine point hardly worthy of dignifying with a response. It’s completely unsubstantiated and there is nothing falsifiable in it. It’s designed to move goalposts and, like most such arguments, it is hideously inelegant; t…
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/21 03:05 AM
1

That’s not misogyny.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 10:43 PM
1

Ohhh yeah also you can go over to r/antifeminists and there’s a pinned post with a list of examples of how feminism has worked against men
/r/MensRights21/05/21 10:42 PM
10

I believe this is an r/Angryupvote moment
/r/MensRights21/05/21 10:22 PM
1

It’s an insanely asinine point hardly worthy of dignifying with a response. It’s completely unsubstantiated and there is nothing falsifiable in it. It’s designed to move goalposts and, like most such arguments, it is hideously inelegant; there are much better explanations for the empathy gap and WAW effect. Unfortunately it seems like this is a popular argument so we often have to waste time addressing it. You could point out that he would never apply that logic to literally any other subject. H…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 10:19 PM
3

Ok just stumbled on this and have to tell this story. It was funny to me that one of the commenters says there’s nothing more infuriating than a man explaining things about her own body cuz it immediately made me think of this time I was at my friend’s apartment and got his female friend super pissed because I “mansplained” the terminology (and some of the structural details) of female genitalia. It basically went like this: She says something indicating that she thinks the vagina is where she p…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 09:54 PM
2

She honestly seemed like she was putting on a show and trying to force conviction into words that she knew aren’t true and had already been exposed as lies by the time she returned to the scene. It’s ok I know for most people scrutinizing a woman’s damsel in distress act doesn’t come naturally, but I’ve kind of developed an immunity to it so I was quite unimpressed by her crocodile tears.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 07:04 PM
7

“I feel like I remember a girlfriend telling me she felt like she remembered hearing about somebody who once read...”
/r/AntiFeminists21/05/21 06:55 PM
2

He hadn’t even been convicted, or even charged, as others who understand AVOs better than I do have pointed out
/r/MensRights21/05/21 06:39 PM
2

Yeah that’s a very good point
/r/MensRights21/05/21 06:23 PM
8

While I agree it shouldn’t be separated from sex, the sad reality is that nobody will care about it if it’s framed as a men’s issue. Can you imagine if it were women who made up 72% of people worked to death though? Everyone would be up in arms. The world doesn’t give a shit about men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/21 04:58 PM
1

Yeah I noticed whenever she’s talking about him hitting her the words break up from a sort of fake forced sob that sounds more like a laugh. As I’ve said elsewhere the guy is more credible because he doesn’t try to paint the worst possible picture of her—but the picture he does paint is of an unhinged and manipulative woman who would try to abuse the system because she didn’t get what she wanted (apparently sex in this case). And honestly that’s how she acts. Why didn’t she deny any of what he s…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 04:41 PM
1

Oh yeah my bad thanks haha. And I had had to google AVO so I’m not super familiar with how they work. Sounds like it really doesn’t mean anything. The sort of thing a jilted woman might get after a bad breakup (sorta like how my brother’s girlfriend in high school tried to sue him for “pain and suffering”)
/r/MensRights21/05/21 04:24 PM
14

It sounds like the officer asked her if she wanted to “detail her claims” against the boyfriend but she had made up her mind that they police had made up their minds and so didn’t even try to talk to them
/r/MensRights21/05/21 02:19 AM
112

It’s interesting that these “journalists” just take it as a given that the man is lying and the woman is telling the truth based purely on sex. They bias the reader with details that aren’t actually verifiable fact (characterizing her as “soft-spoken” during the 911 call) that isn’t even relevant even if true (of course a woman falsely reporting her boyfriend for DV would present herself in a manner that makes her seem like a helpless victim, hence a “soft-spoken” tone). And is a woman with no c…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 02:06 AM
21

It’s very likely that they had good evidence-based reasons for believing the man’s side over the woman’s.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 01:48 AM
1

But thank you for the positivity that’s real sweet
/r/MensRights21/05/21 01:43 AM
3

Hate exists for a reason
/r/MensRights21/05/21 01:42 AM
98

I’ve seen cops on TV (real cops though) arrest men who had clear marks from being attacked by women, just because the unhinged (and clearly unscathed) women told them to arrest them.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 01:26 AM
3

In my experience it seems most of the time men talk for a long time it’s about cars/heavy machinery (usually related to their work or hobbies) or sports, whereas women are more likely to talk about their/others’ relationships
/r/AntiFeminists21/05/21 01:06 AM
3

Believe me, I captioned phone calls for over a year and there are few stereotypes as well earned as women being the chatty/gossipy sex. Women can talk for literally hours about literally nothing, or repeat themselves for hours just saying the same thing that should take less than five minutes to say, and did the first time.
/r/AntiFeminists21/05/21 01:01 AM
6

That is exactly how feminists would frame the issue. That is exactly how they talk about men’s issues: as being all “part of patriarchy” when the more elegant and plausible explanations have to do with the empathy gap and “women are wonderful” effect and such. And there is no evidence that these are “part of patriarchy”: i.e. there is no evidence that they are ameliorated when women have more power. And it’s absurd to call a country that’s had a female PM patriarchal
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/21 09:12 PM
1

Left doesn’t mean neoliberal. It’s about economic issues that should in theory make them more than compatible with MR, such as workers’ rights and affordable healthcare EDIT: That said, this particular post is just playing into the feminists’ narrative
/r/MensRights19/05/21 09:03 PM
2

What country do you live in? This sounds surreally hellish.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 08:58 PM
-1

Also a notoriously unreliable tabloid
/r/MensRights19/05/21 08:54 PM
-1

This sort of thing is embarrassing to see on this sub
/r/MensRights19/05/21 08:08 PM
-5

I think Nah every Internet search turns up Daily Mail as the most “reliable” (read: not actually reliable but at least mainstream) source reporting this
/r/MensRights19/05/21 08:07 PM
-11

I’ll take things that never happened for 500, Alex
/r/MensRights19/05/21 06:56 PM
6

This misses so many marks EDIT: You are playing into the feminists’ narrative. This is exactly how they would frame men’s issues in these societies: as part of some still vague and mythical “patriarchy”
/r/MensRights19/05/21 06:55 PM
87

💯 Most women don’t even know they do it I think because it never occurs to them they should be held to any kind of standards
/r/AntiFeminists19/05/21 12:49 AM
1

Ok but Vince Vaughn was definitely in the wrong here too
/r/MensRights18/05/21 04:30 PM
1

Trust me, ab definition is one of the least important physical attributes to even the shallowest people attracted to men. It’s actually kind of funny how a lot of straight guys think that a six pack is the ultimate sign of fitness and sexual capital. A little body fat (maybe around 15%) is more healthy and desirable to most people.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 11:31 PM
21

Oh no the pedophiles don’t like us how will I cope
/r/MensRights17/05/21 10:57 PM
9

Heels will shorten the achilles tendon over time so really they’re not great to wear often or for extended periods but I feel that things like this are scripted ahead of time or designed to create a situation where the actors can look “fierce” or “woke”
/r/MensRights17/05/21 05:13 PM
12

Way more than 80% of men aren’t CEOs but the point is taken. Another thing is that women try to imagine how male CEOs think by thinking about how they (women) would think given their power, so they think that men have an in-group sex bias like women do which is simply not true and has been proven untrue by many studies. Same goes for men with state power. They have no inclination to make or interpret or enforce laws in a way that benefits the man on the street. Rich men do not feel much more sym…
/r/MensRights16/05/21 09:52 PM
0

It seems like most polyamorous relationships are multiple men (such as they are) orbiting a female planet
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/21 03:51 PM
3

Yes this was part of the impetus for reexamining the validity of witness testimony. The reconstruction of our understanding of memory from a sort of record of actual events to a continually changing construction of events that may or may not have happened but at least feel real was brought about by an epidemic of false memory syndrome whose victims were almost exclusively male. This is how important the phenomenon of false accusation is in intellectual history, despite claims that it is vanishin…
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/21 05:05 AM
2

Damn that’s some next level projection. Modern women’s humor is entirely based on sex and their genitalia because they think they are emulating men. In reality they are the cringe they think they see in the world
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/21 04:54 AM
7

The suffragettes probably caused universal women’s suffrage to be delayed for quite some time. I remember a while back reading an article that began by acknowledging that fact but then saying something to the effect that the movement was still necessary to securing voting rights for women. Those two things can’t both be true. But feminists never let pesky little things like logic get in their way
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/21 02:33 AM
7

Never let feminists control research or history. Never forgive them. Never compromise.
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/21 11:34 PM
1

This was never a common thing in any era
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:12 PM
1

Assuming that’s true what were these three war movies? I might like to check them out
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:12 PM
54

Under “House Rules” Rule #3: Respect goes both ways.” Ahahahahahahahahhahahahaha.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:00 PM
3

Imagine my shock
/r/MensRights15/05/21 10:57 PM
1

Well if she didn’t specify you should have accused her of racism and homophobia against the actually most unfairly persecuted members of racial/sexual/etc. minorities, who are male (statistically). And ask why she hates men and if she mentions traditionalism point out that minority and immigrant communities are statistically more socially conservative than whites. If she cites statistics on any kind of violent or sexual crime by sex learn and cite statistics on the same crimes by race. If she sa…
/r/MensRights15/05/21 08:15 PM
3

I’ve definitely seen this in my older brothers’ relationships. To think I once thought myself unlucky for being gay. I think I will at some point have words about this with my sister-in-law whom I have seen batter my brother on multiple occasions including kicking him in the testicles. The justification being that he cheated on her early on in their relationship (but so what? what does a woman really have to fear from a man cheating? even if we lived in a world where a woman had to pay child sup…
/r/MensRights15/05/21 05:03 AM
3

I’ve done it many a time
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:36 AM
12

“A guy’s not gonna do that to a group of guys.” Uhhh yeah. He would. Because he doesn’t want a bunch of crazy broads treating or, god forbid, publicly labeling him a creep and a probable predator, so guys are safer to approach. What bizarro dimension is Joe living in? I knew Joe was a simp from his standup where he admits being “sexist against men” and doesn’t seem to think that he should make any effort to stop. But I didn’t know he was this vapid tbh.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:35 AM
1

Ah yes the old “I was only pretending to be [redacted]” line goddamn I missed a perfect Joseph Joestar moment
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:45 AM
1

Gen z seems pretty based
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:41 AM
1

I’m 30. I’m a millennial. But I’ll take that as a compliment thanks
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:41 AM
1

Yeah exactly Idk why mr first day on the internet is being so defensive about this
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:31 AM
1

Ok boomer
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:30 AM
2

This use of the meme implies that is not female privilege. Memes have rules for use that are just as strict and well established as words. This is a misuse of memetic language. That’s not an opinion
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:25 AM
2

In the meme the thing the man is gesturing towards is meant to not be an example of what he’s asking about. In the original he is gesturing towards a butterfly and asking, “Is this a bird?” Actually even before that he asks, “What kind of bird is this?” which I believe may have been the original quote from the anime
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:20 AM
8

“A cop kidnapped and killed a woman. We must give police more power so that they can enforce curfews and other ridiculous laws against men.”
/r/MensRights15/05/21 01:55 AM
8

Just gotta point out he’s not using that meme right
/r/MensRights15/05/21 01:54 AM
2

Does she realize men can be black? And gay? Why are women
/r/MensRights15/05/21 01:15 AM
1

Imagine getting your PhD for something like this and expecting others to respect your title. Or your field.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 01:10 AM
2

Well this seems...pretty pointless. Not a criticism of you OP. I mean it does obviously pertain to this sub but like.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 12:35 AM
15

Yeah they’re literally making shit up and misandrists assault and kill men all the time but it’s practically legal for them to do so because they pretend it was self-defense or that they were being terrorized and most people will believe anything a woman says if she cries a little and acts histrionic, which is their specialty Misogynists mostly avoid unnecessary interaction with women
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/21 10:52 PM
3

The female is doing “comedy”. Laugh now, incel
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/21 10:47 PM
0

They’re simps and simping for wahmmin is very straight
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/21 07:28 PM
7

This is sorta the fault of high-value simps making basic women think they’re high-value just because chads will use their holes. This is something that women who try to “reclaim” the term stacy as the female counterpart of chad do not understand. By definition stacys are fungible, as you said, and their only real value is conferred by high-value men
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/21 06:20 PM
4

So a typical feminist.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 04:09 PM
1

The Constitution is pretty much useless.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 04:06 PM
13

I’m sure feminists will really like what comes out of a society full of disaffected, atomized men deprived of one of the main legitimate means of gaining social status without violence—i.e. educational achievement. There is no way a society full of blue-collar and unemployed men who have nothing to lose could turn out bad for everyone. /s
/r/MensRights14/05/21 04:00 PM
9

Food > flowers but saying something nice < flowers. I mean as far as the effort they show. You should be telling your SO nice things anyway. It’s the bare minimum.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 03:25 PM
2

Pump and dump ain’t wasting money if you dump in time and don’t get greedy. Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered, as my granddad used to say. Also, what?
/r/MensRights14/05/21 03:19 PM
1

Eh he was probably right in what he wrote. The absurdity is that disingenuous capitalists control all criticism of capitalism. They make sure it’s not viable by responding neoliberal identitarianism which has no purpose other than to divide and conquer
/r/MensRights14/05/21 06:12 AM
2

Whenever someone tries to assert that a phenomenon is cultural but can’t even reference a cross-cultural study that’s cringe as hell tbh
/r/MensRights14/05/21 04:45 AM
4

This is not really a good example
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/21 04:24 AM
3

What
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/21 04:23 AM
2

Oh also being an even slightly honest and critical-minded man whose rational faculties aren’t blinded by sexual attraction to women
/r/MensRights14/05/21 04:17 AM
3

Having female teachers show blatant favoritism to female students (EDIT: Or, well, having female teachers) Object lessons in the fact that female are not held accountable for actions that males would be, and that males are often even held accountable for females’ actions Taking any women’s studies class Bringing up male issues or “gender” issues not centered strictly around a framework of feminist dogma, in the company of females, and seeing how rabidly they defend their privilege and their supp…
/r/MensRights14/05/21 04:16 AM
1

Like I said it is literally legal. At least in the vast majority of places in the world
/r/MensRights14/05/21 04:07 AM
7

I support this message so hard. I’m shocked sometimes to see how regressive feminism is. As a gay man I recognize echoes of the fear mongering and moral panics against gay men (and specifically and uniquely men—we must never forget or gloss over that fact by conflating the experiences of gay men with those of lesbians) in the absurd, moralizing, intellectually dishonest language used against male sexuality today. There has been a definite and sharp departure in feminism and neoliberal identitari…
/r/MensRights13/05/21 10:06 PM
1

Nah imprinting on sex partners is a real thing for women (and bottoms, fun fact). That’s why divorce risk is so insanely highly correlated with the wife (but not the husband) having previous sexual partners. Modern straight men are fucked. And cucked. Sorry. You should probably just get like platonic marriages with your buddies.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/21 07:06 PM
1

I’m not a gender. Male is my sex. Gender is for words. The practice of ascribing “gender” to humans comes from pedophile kiwi John Money.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/21 07:02 PM
2

Wow you too? That’s crazy, u/twitterInfo_bot
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/21 06:54 PM
1

I can’t even imagine screaming in a situation like that. I’ve often wondered what it must be like to be the kind of person that literally screams compulsively every time there’s a situation that they perceive as dangerous. Seems like such a strange reflex.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/21 06:53 PM
1

They’re constantly trying to change the definitions of what counts as grooming and predatory behavior because of their insecurity. If they could they would redefine pedophilia to include an adult man in his prime refusing to date dried up cougars.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/21 06:44 PM
3

Huh I didn’t realize that only empty egg cartons could be nurses. Or know the signs of a stroke which...like...a lot of people do. Everyone should. Strokes happen at every age, fairly commonly.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/21 06:41 PM
3

It’s so obvious that the women who freak out about men condoning the actions of the men/boys in these videos, are just scared of being held accountable for their actions and most likely are the types who casually hit/have hit men because they got upset. They’re the women who never say anything about men attacking other men who are larger and clearly much stronger than them and getting what they deserve, but then when a female assailant gets hit back and people say “Equal rights equal lefts” they…
/r/MensRights13/05/21 06:08 PM
3

I’ve talked about this so many times. I do not understand why it seems to be so incredibly common for women to basically confuse their dreams with reality. If I had a dollar for every time I’ve heard—usually from the woman herself—about a woman dreaming that their SO wronged her and woke up and hit him because of what “he” did in her dream, I would be rich. There are even cases where women have pressed charges because of something they dreamed a man did. Never heard of a man doing anything remot…
/r/MensRights13/05/21 05:50 PM
1

If you go to any large mall with a directory that lists stores for men’s clothing and stores for women’s clothing the latter will always be longer. Women have more options but that’s not necessarily not fair. That’s part of why women’s clothing is more expensive. Another part is they are more likely to be buying their clothes with somebody else’s money so they’re willing to pay more even for more cheaply made clothes.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 05:43 PM
2

It’s okay I understand and thanks for explaining btw but yeah check out some stuff on the Title IX/Dear Colleague situation if you haven’t
/r/MensRights12/05/21 10:25 PM
1

Their marriage contracts are continually revised without their consent legislatively, perhaps? EDIT: Probably not in the case of Bill and Melinda but for people a bit older than them perhaps and more normal
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 06:43 PM
1

That’s not just the (modern) “media” bro that is literally how romance is historically defined. It evolved from courtly love. Look that shit up
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 06:04 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_IX here’s the basic rundown on Title IX (which is the first thing you’d find by googling it)
/r/MensRights12/05/21 07:22 AM
1

There’s plenty of information presented in the link, and already known to most people who are familiar with Title IX and “Dear Colleague”, by way of context
/r/MensRights12/05/21 07:20 AM
1

Sounds like a you problem
/r/MensRights12/05/21 04:24 AM
4

That’s a ridiculous number of words for “I have never been inside a single mother’s home”
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/21 04:22 AM
2

This is why they don’t deserve more funding. Or any.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 01:26 AM
1

That’s sufficient though. Is there something sketchy about what was linked, to you?
/r/MensRights11/05/21 09:42 PM
1

How?
/r/MensRights11/05/21 07:31 PM
1

They may in theory, i.e. they’d tell you they’re human if you asked, but not in practice.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 06:17 PM
14

Grooming is what an adult does to a naive child who doesn’t know what’s goin on at first, not an adult messaging a younger adult (age of consent is 16 in Scotland where she’s from, as it is in my state) who is receptive from the beginning. Conflating the two is gross. I don’t find it any more reprehensible than hookup culture in general and I wouldn’t consider a 17-year-old a victim solely for the fact they hooked up with a 34-year-old. Only if there was some kind of coercion.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 04:13 PM
7

Ehh she answered “nearly 18” when asked her age and “not if you’re around” when he asked if she had a boyfriend, then he asked when her birthday was implying he wanted to meet up when she was 18 which sorta just speaks to the absurdity of overly inflexible and high ages of consent (globally 18 is pretty high). And I’ve hooked up with/dated plenty of people twice my age in my time. As for her parents their parenting isn’t really everyone else’s responsibility 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights11/05/21 03:57 PM
13

One of the “allegations” was from someone he’d been in a relationship with and it was basically “I didn’t like that he asked if I’d go down on him in a car while we were already romantically involved,” and most of the others weren’t even allegation but just women responding to allegations (being supportive of the coven I mean sisterhood)
/r/MensRights11/05/21 03:39 PM
11

A large portion of states actually don’t consider it rape and this just in: The US is not the only country
/r/MensRights11/05/21 03:36 PM
4

Concern trolling is just so tiresome
/r/MensRights11/05/21 02:41 AM
506

I read “classist feminism” at first and yes to both versions of this comment “Wow rich men aren’t utterly destroyed by accusations so obviously nobody is.” Someone once pointed out that women who compare themselves only to elite men do so because they’re the only men they consider human and I think about that a lot
/r/MensRights11/05/21 02:22 AM
1

I don’t think this is true tbh but I’m an exclu so 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights11/05/21 02:19 AM
0

Jesus
/r/MensRights11/05/21 02:19 AM
5

Again who the fuck cares if the against hate harpies wanna try to police our language? If you honestly think you’re gonna placate them you’re delusional. If anything it’s good that they’re spreading our ideas. The vast majority of the comments they take issue with contain at the very least a large grain of truth to any man who’s not willfully blind or a hopeless simp (and even many of those will eventually become disillusioned).
/r/MensRights11/05/21 01:36 AM
4

In practice misandry always goes hand-in-hand with racism against the historically most persecuted groups, but it is always expressed using qualifiers referring to groups that are socially “ok” to hate openly (straight, white, cis, even upper-class) all while giving reasons for hating men which are more applicable to other groups (particularly lower socioeconomic classes, migrants from more conservative cultures, etc.). An example of this is white women being less likely to accuse white men of r…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 08:36 PM
15

Woke white women aren’t gonna be honest about their real prejudices even on an anonymous survey. They’re too good at lying to themselves about all socially proscribed forms of bigotry they hold
/r/MensRights10/05/21 07:55 PM
0

How long are we gonna pretend that we’ll get anywhere with good PR instead of by corroborating what all young men who aren’t willfully blind realize about their place in society vs women’s? Having empathy and sympathy for men doesn’t come naturally to most people. We need to make men better at acting in their own interest by making them fucking angry. And you know what? From what I’ve seen over just the past few years that’s working. Men of my generation and younger who do not even consider them…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 07:43 PM
8

Feminists lol
/r/MensRights10/05/21 06:36 AM
8

I kinda do and don’t. On the one hand they’re clearly desperately lonely but the way they respond to their loneliness is bad for society and for men, because they’re just contributing to women’s inflated sense of worth. Plus a delusional belief that you have a meaningful relationship with someone who doesn’t even think about you and would probably scream and run away if you approached her in real life, is not a substitute for a real relationship and probably only makes their loneliness worse, mu…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 05:14 AM
8

It has kind of a lot of definitions but I use it more or less as a synonym for white knight
/r/MensRights10/05/21 04:51 AM
27

Both are used as insults mostly by women and their simps. They’re the ones who most often resort to shaming language against either sex.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 04:42 AM
7

Dude really thinks this is a fringe position. The irony and lack of self-awareness is amazing. It’s not even a fringe position outside of the MRM. Practically everyone I know of my generation or younger thinks neonatal MGM is fucked up. I know guys who’ve suffered botched circumcisions. It’s horrific. Almost all the supposed benefits are straight up lies and those that aren’t don’t come within lightyears of making up for the harm. You mean to tell me an operation for which chronic UTIs are one o…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 04:14 AM
1

Wait “You can’t change God’s creation?” Then why do Muslims practice circumcision then? I’m just genuinely curious as to the rationale not trying to start something lol
/r/MensRights10/05/21 03:49 AM
4

🤡
/r/MensRights10/05/21 03:36 AM
3

I’d say if she had visible injuries from the alleged assault that would be pretty good evidence. However I’ve also seen on COPS women who were clearly lying about being attacked by their male partners and were in fact the only aggressors but the cops still arrested the men because a woman scorned told them to. I mean like I can recall at least two incidents from that show where cops were called to a domestic disturbance, the woman claimed to have been attacked but didn’t have any marks, she kept…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 03:31 AM
9

And the real disgusting freaks are the ones who have such poor hygiene that they think getting part of their dick removed is preferable to cleaning it.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 02:53 AM
15

What’s your deal? I’ve seen you before and you’re a fucking clown. Coming to an MR sub and barging into every post about circumcision to claim it’s not relevant. If neonatal circumcision isn’t an MR issue nothing is.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 02:52 AM
2

I agree but keep in mind this is The Sun so I’m not too confident any of this even fuckin happened
/r/MensRights09/05/21 08:00 PM
2

Also MGM is more extreme than female genital pricking, but the latter is illegal everywhere that FGM is illegal.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 07:55 PM
2

Maybe a nitpick but the clitoris is not synonymous with the glans clitoris.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 07:50 PM
1

It depends. I know I’ve seen the claim that the most common form of FGM is clitoral hoodectomy, which is equivalent to MGM. There are also women who elect to have their clitoral hoods removed just as there are men who elect to be circumcised, though the reasons are usually different. Apparently some women do it because their glans clitoris is too sensitive or something. Anyway it’s something about sexual pleasure. Men usually choose circumcision because of phimosis, though I think that’s usually…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 07:46 PM
7

Yeah like not to victim blame but hey maybe don’t do that ever
/r/MensRights09/05/21 07:38 PM
3

“White men who killed God” is literally just a woke-sounding way of claiming that all scientific advancement has come from white men.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 07:34 PM
2

What does environmental science have to do with fatal defects? I’d be cool with executing everyone involved in making the decision to cover those up tbh. Obviously fines aren’t doing the job of deterring mass negligent homicide
/r/MensRights09/05/21 07:21 PM
2

Oh thanks I guess I missed that EDIT: Now I remember that’s pretty much how Tulsi Gabbard singlehandedly ended Kamala’s primary run
/r/MensRights08/05/21 05:25 PM
4

It’s not even like supporting JD and calling for repercussions against AH is a fringe position. It seems to be the norm (thank god). Really makes you think about how out of touch major social-media/tech corporations are (despite their “big data”). They operate under ideologies that are absolutely divorced from reality
/r/MensRights08/05/21 05:16 PM
16

before it leads to more women and children dying Interesting. Ok Google, which sex kills their children more frequently?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/21 04:11 PM
1

Idk about tax evasion but yeah certainly malicious negligence that costs human lives. Like the many instances where car manufacturers have decided that willfully ignoring fatal defects would be less costly in the long run than a recall
/r/MensRights08/05/21 03:47 PM
1

Who though? The Verona documents seem to make her guilt pretty much beyond question.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 03:41 PM
1

I’m unaware if so. What do you mean?
/r/MensRights08/05/21 03:34 PM
3

And even those who are exonerated can suffer irrevocably and even die as a result of the stress and trauma of spending years on death row
/r/MensRights08/05/21 03:33 PM
5

So you’re for it but with reforms, potentially?
/r/MensRights08/05/21 05:12 AM
1

I don’t know that that’s a very good example either tbh
/r/MensRights08/05/21 04:37 AM
3

“Obviously overcriminalization of black men is actually driven by anti-white racism because whites are seen as too delicate and weak to commit violent crime or for the violent crime they do commit to be considered as much of a threat as that which the ‘powerful’ and ‘competent’ blacks commit.” This is literally how they sound to normal people.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 03:53 AM
1

Wow. Well I hope you feel safe some day, though in not gonna say you shouldn’t be wary. Can I ask how it turned out and if you got to clear your name?
/r/MensRights08/05/21 03:03 AM
1

Damn I’m sorry man that is horrifying. One of my worst nightmares, or similar to it. I hope nothing bad came of it (for you)?
/r/MensRights08/05/21 02:40 AM
1

You don’t seem to be able to even attempt to explain yourself so yes. Yes I am
/r/MensRights08/05/21 01:34 AM
1

You said becuz muh 8th Amendment. The 8th Amendment says nothing about mitigating circumstances let alone mental competence. If you can’t see that the question whether the death penalty in general is unconstitutional, is a completely separate question from what I asked, you have no business calling anyone dense
/r/MensRights08/05/21 01:30 AM
1

Enlighten us then
/r/MensRights08/05/21 01:12 AM
1

Since that’s all you can say I’d say you’re in that camp buddy. I’m not defending the death penalty but no fundamental legal right or principle obligates us to see intellectually impaired people as somehow less responsible when they freely choose to grievously harm someone
/r/MensRights08/05/21 01:05 AM
1

It’s pretty obvious that she meant to kill the second victim and there was definite mens rea that her intellectual disability didn’t erase. Plenty of people have intellectual disabilities and do not make the choice to murder people
/r/MensRights08/05/21 12:53 AM
4

If she truly didn’t comprehend the immediate consequences of pointing a gun at someone and pulling the trigger, or even the basic function of guns in general, and didn’t actually intend to hurt anyone but was basically just unlucky, that’s one thing. If she just wasn’t able to think ahead to the later consequences to herself of willfully murdering people, that’s different and not really relevant.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 12:46 AM
1

Fair enough, but still a different issue, not a burden of proof issue. Having a higher burden of proof for more serious charges is a basic legal right. Accounting for mental competency is arguably more of a courtesy.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 12:23 AM
63

Can anyone point to even one example of a woman executed in America by the state based on a conviction that was not beyond the shadow of a doubt or even reasonable doubt?
/r/MensRights07/05/21 11:15 PM
4

It should, but they’re rarely self-aware enough to own up to the atrocious racist implications of their already atrociously bigoted ideology. Their capacity to tolerate cognitive dissonance (or maybe just not experience it in the first place) seems boundless. EDIT: Well that could just be my experience talking to these people since I’m not black and they don’t tend to look at the soundness of arguments but only at the identity of the people making them
/r/MensRights07/05/21 07:34 PM
1

I don’t know how you can really say that anyone’s in a better position than they were pre-conception, let alone just because they have all their “needs” met. That’s a pretty low bar for wellbeing
/r/MensRights07/05/21 07:22 PM
1

Always thought it was wild that there are people who try to deny it. They really don’t have a leg to stand on
/r/MensRights07/05/21 07:20 PM
1

They’re simps and should be shamed as such
/r/MensRights07/05/21 07:17 PM
4

Yeah plus people need to see how deranged these people are
/r/MensRights07/05/21 04:52 PM
1

I don’t really see what the big deal is. Like nothing happened, he respected her boundaries and she pretended to be ok with a situation she supposedly wasn’t just to go bitch about it later to strangers online, anonymously. So dramatic.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 03:17 PM
12

“The good n*****’s guide to not getting lynched”
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:49 PM
8

Academic definitions from grievance studies fields aren’t legitimate, and they aren’t applied in an intellectually honest way. For example the academic definition of toxic masculinity is traditionally male behavior that is harmful to others and/or to those who display it. But this describes many pro-social behaviors and traits such as bravery, and sometimes ambition, and professions that we all depend on, such as first-responders and all the dangerous/dirty jobs that create and maintain our infr…
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:35 AM
-1

Ngl toxic masculinity’s sorta hot 🥴
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:21 AM
2

God I can’t stand [redacted] that use racial/sexual minorities as shields to sound woke while hating men. Here’s what you do: Ask her what statistical basis she has for limiting her generalizations to “straight white” men. If you do it right and she has a shred of self-awareness that survived the giant-digestive-system-producing-insufferable-pieces-of-shit that we in the west call college, you can make her positively squirm. Because ethnic minorities tend to be far more socially conservative tha…
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:14 AM
1

The fact that domestic abuse against men is more likely to involve force and injury according to this makes me think the men are underreporting abuse compared to women because it takes more severe abuse for men to even recognize it as abuse. Also is this really only looking at people above 16? I’m honestly more interested in rates of childhood domestic abuse against boys vs girls and the perpetrators’ sex. That could be illuminating and is something too rarely discussed as a contributing factor …
/r/MensRights07/05/21 01:43 AM
2

Then why are you friends with one
/r/MensRights07/05/21 01:24 AM
1

What does this have to do with men’s issues tho
/r/MensRights06/05/21 10:58 PM
1

Imagine sending nudes with identifying features in them to anyone other than your partner in a stable, committed relationship
/r/MensRights06/05/21 10:53 PM
1

This is real as hell. I’ve been sexually and otherwise assaulted by women at gay bars (and once at a regular bar that I can recall). Nothing quite this extreme—just unwanted kissing, biting, slapping, thigh rubbing, crotch and ass groping (all by women including one trans women who knew I’m gay)—and it’s not like it was traumatic but it was definitely legally assault and would have been seen as a huge deal had the roles been reversed. The most humiliating and discouraging part was my awareness o…
/r/MensRights06/05/21 10:33 PM
4

Like most of feminism’s claims about the misogyny of society, it’s only an effective rhetorical/control tactic because it represents the opposite of reality. It makes for a great moral panic precisely because the very notion of it is horrifying to most people. But feminists should be wary of causing collective concern fatigue. The generations growing up surrounded by blatant attempted gaslighting by feminists are liable not to care about actual victims
/r/MensRights06/05/21 09:59 PM
4

This is one category of crime I have a hard time imagining any man has ever committed or would ever commit. Why would they? False accusations/reporting is only a viable means to get revenge and/or clout if you’re a woman
/r/MensRights06/05/21 09:51 PM
6

You don’t speak for anyone but yourself and this is an extremely weird take
/r/MensRights06/05/21 09:27 PM
1

How would we know without even knowing your friend? As the one guy said there’s really only one answer if she’s a real friend and any other reaction would mean she’s not, so tell her and you’ll either be supported or know to cut ties with her, in which case you’ll be down one toxic associate in your life. No downside really
/r/MensRights06/05/21 08:46 PM
0

A mostly straight friend of mine once told me out of nowhere that sex with men smells better too lol
/r/MensRights05/05/21 02:35 PM
5

It’s cuz boys probably know, even if only on a gut level, that they hate them. Just like we grow up knowing where we stand in every other aspect of society and that it’s not a particularly high or comfortable place
/r/MensRights05/05/21 06:18 AM
1

Yeah it’s not even seen as weird for women to flirt “playfully” or “teasingly” with young boys. Women think nothing of it. But most of the time if you reversed the sexes it would look to most people like the groomer behavior it is
/r/MensRights04/05/21 02:33 PM
3

I’ve noticed this in lots of movies and it always bugged me even as a kid. (Guess I never really internalized the message that being overtly horny was a positive and manly trait, partly because I was a pretty serious Catholic and partly because I didn’t relate to the types of horny that I saw depicted and wouldn’t come to terms with my own sexuality till I was 19.) The Sandlot and Big are two more examples. Big is less egregious in that the actual actor in the sex scene isn’t a child, but more e…
/r/MensRights04/05/21 02:31 PM
2

I was never really taught not to show emotion but as I grew up it just turned out I was not a very outwardly emotional person, at least as far as crying went. I really don’t cry when I’m at my most miserable. It just doesn’t happen. And I’m sick of the woke, well intentioned mainstream narrative about men’s mental health conflating “emotion” with “emotions women are more likely to express” and saying that men would be better off if they just had the same patterns of emoting as women. First off, …
/r/MensRights04/05/21 02:19 PM
2

Histrionics proving the very points they’re attacking. I’ve noticed men who don’t even consider themselves MRAs noticing the facts pointed out in the post they link and refusing to play our cultures’ little man-hating, instrumentalizing games and it’s making feminists nervous. Good.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 01:41 PM
1

https://archive.is/IXVao God the reporting on it is disgusting. How is this even legal? The victim who escaped is ”at large”??
/r/MensRights03/05/21 11:56 PM
1

You know it must be bad as hell if Australia’s taking it seriously
/r/MensRights03/05/21 11:47 PM
2

I’m a butch trans lesbian with a PIV fetish UwU
/r/MensRights19/05/20 08:21 PM
3

"Study finds something at odds with what every other similar study has found, but I like this study's findings so they're true." Yes that's exactly how science works.
/r/MensRights20/03/20 04:42 PM
3

Specifically taking revenge for problems you blame your fathers' generation for out on your sons while your fathers' generation cheers on and profits from it.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 03:43 AM
3

Body shaming women care about: "Wow you look unhealthily overweight maybe you should choose to eat less and make health-conscious decisions." Body shaming they don't care about: "Wow your genes gave you inadequate stature or dick size you should basically kill yourself haha incel."
/r/MensRights11/09/19 06:26 PM
9

Absolutely telling that he doesn't see being subjected to medical torture and sexual assault as a child "as serious as abuse or anything."
/r/MensRights06/09/19 10:16 AM
14

Men's liberation through a feminist lens is like black loberation through the lens of the KKK's ideology
/r/MensRights03/09/19 05:36 PM
2

I have an older brother with Klinefelter Syndrome. I had no idea such a high percentage ended up living as female. Do you have a good source for this? He has never seemed to express any gender dysphoria outwardly but when I think about some experiences that are common among trans women I can kind of see similarities, though I don't know if it's a stretch. Things like trying extra hard to be masculine because he never felt like enough of a man because his body didn't produce enough testosterone (…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 04:50 AM
9

Men give what the fuck they get. If anything men have more empathy than women relative to the pathetic levels of empathy shown to them.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 04:33 AM
1

It's not like it'll ever be enforceable as written. Even conservative SCOTUS justices will respect precedent.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 03:41 AM
1

There are perfectly reliable methods of suicide that won't get your walls all sticky, Brenda. God.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 10:37 PM
2

That was all men's fault for not having invented antibacterial soap and antibiotics yet.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 10:35 PM
6

Eww, though. Rationalwiki. A.K.A. "I am very smart dot com"
/r/MensRights13/03/19 09:32 PM
1

I always just point out comparisons between how they talk about men and how racists talk about black people. 🤷‍♂️ For example, they'll attribute some type of bad behavior to "toxic masculinity" that I'll then have to point out is statistically more of a feminine trait (like policing gender norms for men and/or women, forcing unrealistic beauty standards on women, etc.), and they'll try to backpedal (retreat to the bailey), saying "Just because I'm criticizing men who do this doesn't mean I'm say…
/r/MensRights13/03/19 09:31 PM
1

Lucky. Seems to be part of Newspeak.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 08:50 PM
2

Perhaps that's true but I find it's typical in the British media, or perhaps just the anglophone media in general outside the US. No idea when it started or why but it really grates on my nerves more than it should when I hear a native English speaker talking about women/minorities being "discriminated".
/r/MensRights13/03/19 08:26 PM
5

But how can that be when I have it from multiple highly reliable and reputable sources that a woman would never...
/r/MensRights13/03/19 08:22 PM
6

This has always been the case. Women are more likely to use psychologically abusive tactics like these.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 03:26 PM
2

When did it become acceptable to use "discriminate" as a transitive verb?
/r/MensRights11/03/19 03:22 PM
46

Dogs are fucking great though. People who say this disparagingly just show that they hate dogs and therefore cannot be trusted in any way
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:55 AM
2

Why is this legal?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 03:35 AM
1

The fact she's only the first woman to be convicted on a charge of controlling behavior is a grim proof of this.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 03:26 AM
1

She'd have more.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 03:11 AM
1

The one saying men are only good for sex but otherwise she can take them or leave them; they're just like desert. Nice when she's in the mood but serving no point otherwise. The other one who said she likes them for sex but doesn't want them to be so motivated by sex. (Iirc this was a different one from the first but there were several who only listed sex as reasons they need men.) All the women who mentioned only what men could do for them in terms of sex/providing when asked what they like abo…
/r/MensRights05/03/19 10:00 PM
1

How is it that Psychology Today is such a bastion for men's rights and even anti-feminist education when the APA is the exact opposite these days?
/r/MensRights05/03/19 05:01 PM
1

You can tell from how half these women talk that they don't even know what they're talking about when they claim to love men in any way. They don't even see men as humans. I was hoping this would be a somewhat uplifting video because I've been way too "in my head" myself lately thinking about everything from feminist manipulation of discourse on abuse with an aim to blaming men for forms of abuse known to be predominately used by women, to the realization that most female educators I've had expe…
/r/MensRights05/03/19 04:50 PM
11

t this point Vice knows they're nothing but shitposting clickbait whores and have accepted that as their entire business model
/r/MensRights05/03/19 04:13 PM
17

These days, at least two of those, yes
/r/PussyPass24/01/19 11:41 PM
12

What ever happened to the lawsuit charging that she'd led an illegal purge of male employees? Haven't heard ANY updates and it's been like what, two years? I know these things can move slowly but Jesus
/r/PussyPass24/01/19 11:40 PM
1

Also read: http://archive.is/ROma9
/r/MensRights04/10/18 10:19 PM
1

It's almost like what was once common sense is now haram under the religion of feminism.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 05:47 AM
1

I really wish men would stop putting women on a pedestal. Then the attitude that this is just a bit of cheeky fun that the fellas "probably enjoyed" would go away.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 05:30 AM
13

Better yet (since I don't really believe this is sexualizing necessarily) let's stop forcing children to give each other brain damage that will have lasting effects on mental development and quality of life later in life, mmkay?
/r/MensRights04/10/18 05:25 AM
1

No that wasn't it. My memory was of a comment made to Frederick Douglass about how women's traditional position is even worse than that of a slave.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 07:35 PM
3

It's funny how they'll look at the low percentage of accusations proven false and use that as the percentage that are actually false, but look at the comparably low percentage of accusations proven true and say this shows the system is biased towards the accused. Feminism has always been built on contradictory, ad hoc bullshit like that.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 05:14 PM
4

Bill Cosby's only crime was being a master "seducer", apparently.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 08:11 PM
2

I miss when this sort of shit was just called insecurity. And let's be real here. These attitudes are much more common in certain communities that tend to have mostly fatherless househlds. So is "toxic masculinity" really caused by literal matriarchy? 🤔
/r/MensRights25/07/18 08:56 PM
3

I can't remember the last time this would have surprised me. M
/r/MensRights25/07/18 07:38 PM
3

Yup. That's it. I'm out.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 09:08 PM
3

A majority of women I know, even the one's I consider friends (though maybe not for long), seem to basically share the same thinking about sexual assault/harassment being such a huge problem that it's okay to undermine due process and presumption of innocence, to see a few innocent men lose their jobs, and to broaden even the definition of what constitutes assault (e.g. saying that there can be no consent if there is a power imbalance).
/r/MensRights17/07/18 08:59 PM
5

I wouldn't go that far but yes, in this case Obama fucked up. And considering how disastrous Dear Colleague (not Title IX but a ridiculously nebulous broadening of Title IX's enforcement) has been for minority students, Obama should go down in history as a race traitor imo.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 08:52 PM
2

And women are useless after 33. Funny how that works.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 08:45 PM
14

It's a good thing there's no legitimate reason why it's super important to know the identities of the biological parents, like to know family medical history or anything like that, and this totally isn't disastrous for the child's welfare /s
/r/MensRights17/07/18 08:44 PM
1

They should fry.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 01:47 AM
1

He says our fathers and grandfathers were required to earn more money to be viable marriage candidates, but what if we're honest about the fact that this fact has not changed one iota and will not change one iota as long as human nature is the way it's been for 200 millennia? This is not a sustainable state of affairs.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 01:36 AM
1

I honestly doubt that Takei has any active oversight over his social media, let alone decides what to post. I mean he's a tit, I'm not defending him. But I've had the impression for a while now that he simply handed that shit over to millennial queer socialist activists.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 01:27 AM
0

Women proving that they're irrationally sensitive by responding to accusations that they're irrationally sensitive in an irrationally sensitive manner.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 12:34 AM
2

They wouldn't show those ads with the sexes switched because they are pandering to women, because it still *is* the case that women control the market for these products. That always will be the case, I think.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 07:35 AM
2

Is getting groped really "traumatic", though? Really? It's telling that even members of a Men's Rights sub have to pretend to care more about women being groped than they would care if they themselves were groped. I understand that this is a matter of principle because Trudeau is a huge hypocrite and deserves a taste of his own medicine. But most of you care about the potential groping in its own right and that is baffling to me. Like, there's another post virtue signaling about Mel B getting gr…
/r/MensRights09/07/18 02:19 AM
2

How is it possible for a society to simultaneously believe that sex is the equivalent of a pleasant conversation but then (a) be shocked, shocked by behavior like this, and (b) see it as reflective of a "social" problem that can or should be addressed through incessant nagging from the very people who pushed for the change of social mores that makes it so mundane? I just really don't care. Everyone gets groped. Why would I act outraged when it happens to celebrities when it literally does not ev…
/r/MensRights09/07/18 02:03 AM
1

Gross! Who wants to share a restroom with women? Not even women do. Are any of your toilets ever not clogged?
/r/MensRights29/06/18 08:31 PM
1

So this whole thing was really just the media martyrizing another abusive woman. What else is new.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 08:30 PM
1

Extremely predictable.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 02:51 PM
4

This is the most insane idiocy I've seen in like an hour. Why does our society enable women to be so toxic and obtuse?
/r/MensRights22/06/18 04:12 PM
7

Political asylum based on what? "I want a better job" =/= a basis for claiming asylum. Don't give her shit. This is also literally kidnapping on the mother's part. It's super sad that the father doesn't seem to recognize that or the fact that he has any rights here.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 04:07 PM
1

Well now the frog is dead.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 04:01 PM
1

But it does help show this is an evolved trait of women. And asking someone to strip down at a bar (unless it's that kind of bar) is a much bigger stretch than instigating fights over your "honor" (or simply your pussy) for the sake of ego gratification.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 03:53 AM
1

I was actually gonna ask if you've ever been to a bar but thought that might come off as douchey lol
/r/MensRights21/06/18 03:50 AM
1

http://www.rebelcircus.com/blog/girls-like-guys-fight-science/
/r/MensRights21/06/18 12:51 AM
1

Are you actually kidding? I've seen girls instigate shit with guys just to get their boyfriends to fight them for them, and know guys who've been the victims of that behavior (not as boyfriends but as the guys the girls were trying to get their boyfriends to fight). I have a brother who was pistol whipped over it when he was like 17. I guarantee you can find videos showing this behavior, and even heard at least one story of a gay guy who at first was confronted by a guy who said his girl had tol…
/r/MensRights21/06/18 12:49 AM
1

How was the rest of the presentation? In my experience just because a university class/presentation says this doesn't mean the rest of it isn't extremely biased. (I've taken a couple required online "violence prevention" courses that were actually just the college covering its ass against Title IX investigations, and the last one said the same thing about "all genders" but three of the videos we watched were blatantly misandric, including the ones made by the Obama administration.)
/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:09 PM
3

Appreciating the female form indicates dubious aesthetic sensibilities but certainly not misogyny ^^
/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:04 PM
1

lol well very few are going to actually admit it. You just have to pay a modicum of attention to how they act and judge men. When women demand their boyfriends put themselves in physical danger to defend their honor from another man hitting on them? That's revealing their evolutionary nature. How about when they hear a bump in the night and want the man to take a bat and go check it out? Or even when they say someone's not a "real man" if he's not professionally cutthroat (a displaced form of co…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:01 PM
2

Uhh, you should make sure someone knows where you are if you're out on your own and/or end up going to a place you're unfamiliar with. I've literally turned down hookups because they were unwilling to meet in a public place. *It is not gendered advice. Everyone with a brain should follow it.*
/r/MensRights19/06/18 05:53 AM
1

To all women who think they want to see a world where their men are incapable of violence: Careful what you wish for is all I can say.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 04:53 AM
6

Well anyone who implies "good at combat" = "monstrous" is a prick who's not worth listening to.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 09:48 PM
1

Sweden's well on the way there: https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/28/health/sweden-gender-neutral-preschool/index.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/24/world/europe/sweden-gender-neutral-preschools.html https://www.thelocal.se/20170926/why-sweden-should-care-about-boys-falling-behind-in-school (Should but won't: "Because more female than male applicants had top marks, the consequence has been that men have been give priority due to a clause in Sweden’s current higher education laws stipulating that …
/r/MensRights18/06/18 09:45 PM
2

And if you know anything about sexual selection (and which sex constitutes the agents thereof) you know that the upshot of this is that women naturally view men as disposable protectors to be sacrificed when shit hits the fan. That's a toxic relationship dynamic these days. So fuck that. Glad I'm gay.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 09:38 PM
1

muh superior female ethics tho. Also I wonder why this has 0 upvotes but the last time I posted it with the title "A Brief Summation" it got 12 upvotes before the "good" mod basically zucc'd it.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 09:35 PM
5

At least they didn't call it a "love affair"
/r/MensRights16/06/18 09:45 PM
4

“I told him, ‘My only stipulation: I wanna do it with you as your character in 'What’s Eating Gilbert Grape,'..." Jesus.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 07:37 AM
3

Oh dang even more evidence of feminism's fixation with bourgeois non-issues over actual harms from which the people most likely to suffer are, well, those groups that tend to be most vulnerable in general.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 07:27 AM
2

9 6 % d i v e r s e
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:01 AM
2

Roman noble women were a big part of the spread of Christianity in Rome. They'd raise their sons Christian because it's actually a pretty feminist religion.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:19 AM
1

I'm obviously pointing out an inconsistency between feminist claims and behavior.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:18 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:17 AM
1

It's strange. You can hardly blame lack of ritualized social aggression as bonding/resilience-building exercises. Everyone knows about the Mean Girls phenomenon and that women are more relationally aggressive than men.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 07:25 AM
3

How fucking stupid are these bitches? Men have demonstrated the ability and willingness to subjugate half the population against its will throughout untold ages and cultures. But sure, you have nothing to lose by starting a war with men and giving us excellent reason to do it again. "The enemy is simultaneously too strong and too weak," I believe is how Umberto Eco described a central tenet of Fascism.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 07:11 AM
1

I've heard more about this sort of thing (anecdotally) with respect to Title IX (from Janet Halley) but I'd be interested in this data collected on Title VII too since that's specifically about both sexual AND racial harassment (among other things). It could effectively mean that the law violates its own principles.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:23 PM
1

Actually the opposite of generalizing but ok
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:19 PM
1

It's honestly scary that it could be the case at any institute of higher indoctrination.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:54 AM
1

Wow that's really weird.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:53 AM
6

Fuck Baby Boomers. Fuck their self-fulfilling sophomoric prejudices against men of my generation and paternalistic worship of and discrimination in favor of women who want to work.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 09:13 PM
8

There's hope though. I've mainly been seeing people of my generation and younger (Gen Z) hating on the show and basically calling Hannah a vindictive bitch.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 06:20 AM
8

Hope they're extra wide. Lol
/r/MensRights04/06/18 06:14 AM
1

Did you point out the irony of how they treated you when you used your voice?
/r/MensRights04/06/18 06:13 AM
3

Not even once.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 11:13 PM
1

Women are much less likely to go to prison for killing men than vice versa. Well, they're much less likely to go to prison for anything than men are.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 10:32 PM
8

They literally always call them "affairs" or "romance" or something to that effect. I've never seen a woman called a rapist by the MSM when it was statutory.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 06:52 AM
4

Female supremacists can't stand when someone says anything remotely unflattering about femininity. EDIT: Had a brain fart. Female *supremacists, not misogynists lol
/r/MensRights27/05/18 10:30 PM
4

As I recall she didn't listen. It was impossible to get through to most of my teachers as a kid. They'd almost all do this weird thing that I think was almost a form of mild gaslighting where they would just keep saying the same shit no matter what you said as though they couldn't hear you or you didn't have a voice. Anyway I don't think I really got a punishment beyond the lecture/gaslighting that time but pretty much all the boys at my school would get in trouble pretty regularly and it was al…
/r/MensRights27/05/18 07:39 PM
16

I remember one time a girl kissed me on the playground when my eyes were closed (iirc I was counting for hide and seek) and the teacher berated and lectured me on appropriate behavior even as I explained that I didn't want the kiss and didn't even know she was there. I remember it was pizza day because she had tomato sauce on her face so the whole thing grossed me out even more than it should have since I turned out to be gay.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 05:09 AM
16

Seems like most guys I know tbh have experience some degree of this—whether in a professional or relationship context—including all three of my brothers and most of my Facebook friends I've talked to about false accusation. These range from accusations of battery that was really self-defense, to accusations of causing "pain and suffering" during a breakup (and threats to sue), to accusations of sexual harassment, to accusations that they never get to actually learn the details of but that ended …
/r/MensRights26/05/18 09:32 PM
19

She "enjoyed" it until she got bored with the thrill of seeing a man in pain. Ever notice how (some, okay maybe most) women have an instinctive revulsion response to anything that makes a man happy and get gratification out of seeing us unhappy—especially if we're killing ourself for a job that makes us miserable?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:03 PM
3

I would love to see this study if you could provide a link.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 07:57 PM
2

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights16/05/18 06:19 AM
1

I'm not exactly new but kinda closeted. I honestly probably wouldn't have looked into it as much as I have if I hadn't kept getting "accused" of being an MRA by feminists. Eventually I decided to find out what an MRA even is, and I found I broadly agree with the MRM. There's a lot more to my journey to my current beliefs and it involves my experiences with female supremacy as a kid, which led to gender dysphoria, which resolved a little after I came to grips with my complicated feelings towards …
/r/MensRights16/05/18 06:16 AM
13

If you have to tell people you're beautiful...you're not. lol
/r/MensRights13/05/18 12:33 AM
5

"We want the best contributors we can get, however I think that gender fits with that. It is important to recognise gender diversity also promotes that difference of thinking as well." Men and women are exactly the same except when it's convenient for us that they not be.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 10:35 PM
3

Third-wave (and for that matter probably second-wave) feminist criticisms of male homosociality are eerily unchanged in their underlying reasoning from second-wave feminist criticisms about male homosexuality. "I am not exaggerating the feminist position, and urge everyone to read Carol Hanisch's article, 'Men's Liberation', from the Redstockings anthology, Feminist Revolution; it is most instructive. Hanisch writes in a very clear, succinct, and straightforward manner; there is never any doubt …
/r/MensRights12/05/18 08:54 PM
1

Never mind, can't seem to find a saved version of the Blogspot page.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 10:33 PM
1

16's actually legal in my state.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 03:16 AM
1

Judaism is, or was before Christianity and Islam, a uniquely anti-sex religion, traditionally. The word mainly used in the Old Testament for nudity had extremely negative connotations. This source claims that it means "hideous flesh", though I can't corroborate that, but it clearly is seen as shameful, which is an attitude I've never heard of in any other ancient religious tradition.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 06:16 PM
3

Isn't that "man" the one who proposed the "affirmative consent" standard? Pretty sure I remember him from a video I had to watch for a "violence prevention" online class for my technical college.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 05:42 PM
1

Aesthetically? Hell yeah. In other ways? Also hell yeah. Just wanted to chime in cuz I'm sure nobody else here will be extolling their aesthetic virtues whereas I will defend the position that the usual pattern seen in nature wherein the male of the species is more aesthetically embellished than the female holds true for humans as well.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 05:34 PM
1

Pain and bloodshed are the norm for male initiation rites in tribes around the world. But libs are just like "Oh, fighting lions with a stick? Gloves full of bullet ants? That's p neat from an impartial anthropological standpoint, which is the only standpoint I take on it." But whenever literally anything unpleasant happens to girls as a matter of course, "This is an international outrage! UN pls halp!"
/r/MensRights22/04/18 05:20 PM
9

"Some of those interviewed conflate female genital mutilation with circumcision. Circumcision is a loss of a small amount of extra tissue of an infant boy vs the heinous practice of female genital mutilation, done up to her mid teens, which is “all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reason” which renders the female incapable of enjoying sex. It is ridiculous to compare the two." Sounds li…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 08:55 PM
2

What's the point of Wonka? He's agreeing with the first graphic lol
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:44 AM
1

But who cares because it was their fault for being born with that penis, innit?
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:41 AM
9

Iirc she herself has even railed against offense culture in citing it as a reason she can't do comedy on college campuses. And she contributes to it. Self-awareness level: feminist.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 04:24 AM
3

Lol everyone loves to say rape is gendered because it's mostly men who do it and mostly women who are victims (though that's mainly to do with how rape is defined since women seem to perpetrate "forced sex" as often as men rape), but I have literally never heard of a man commit the crime of falsely accusing someone of rape, which can easily be as bad as rape in the harm it does, and even worse than rape in some cases. It seems to be the quintessentially female crime, whereas rape is just assovia…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 03:23 AM
1

Fuck I thought I made it back to my home universe. Is this the one where people care more about men's lives than women's? Morty, what the fuck did you do? I told you not to touch anything.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 04:42 AM
2

What does this have to do with satellite TV?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:18 AM
4

The sooner you learn that women do not naturally feel empathy towards men, and most will never be able to learn it, the better off you'll be. This is why I feel amazingly lucky to be gay in this day and age.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:11 AM
3

A FAQ I found when I searched "medical records open to government" on DuckDuckGo: https://www.aclu.org/other/faq-government-access-medical-records
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:52 AM
5

Okay so I'm white as fuck and I was 10 when 9/11 happened, and I can remember how flying changed starting right afterwards. For as long as I can remember the TSA was prohibited by law from profiling based on race/ethnicity/culture, even when doing so would have been objectively more rational than what they were doing, which was random screenings, which I can assure you were actually random. I was regularly singled out for "random screening" when I'd go through security with my family, to the poi…
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:30 AM
7

Which non-Anglo cultures have chosen to end slavery when it was against their best interests?
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:27 AM
1

This is why "historic inequality" as the primary factor contributing to present inequality is a complete red herring. Franchesca Ramsey of MTV's decoded, for example, likes to say "Whites are rich today because they were always rich," yet family wealth fluctuates insanely from generation to generation. Over 80 % of family fortunes are lost each generation. People move into and out of the 1 % all the time. No, the problem is always current discrimination. The idea that we need the government to g…
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:19 AM
12

Why do we glorify the female counterparts of literally every type of undesirable male?
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:13 AM
2

"bois an ther tois lol" You shut your whore mouth, Lori.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/18 01:43 AM
3

Big angry. Gotta go to PPD to calm myself.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 01:41 AM
1

Careful what you wish for.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/18 01:40 AM
1

Trans (well, gender dysphoric) mass shooter Asian school shooter (lololol) Latino school shooter Native American school shooter Black school shooter Female school shooters: 1 (She's considered the "first modern school shooter", no less.), 2 (also black), 3 (This one was a professor.), 4, 5, 6 (To be fair, women don't seem to be very good at this.) Et cetera. Use this website to find more examples to use to counter this nonsense. Fact is whites are not even overrepresented among mass shooters.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 03:42 AM
3

Don't do anything over a woman, with the exception maybe of your mom. They're not worth it.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 07:12 AM
1

I'd kinda like to know what the response to the episode from The Establishment has been. I mean, I don't really follow anyone on Twitter, or many SJWs in general. But it would be extremely..."academically" interesting to know what they are saying and if there is any real diversity of thought in their takes.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 05:13 AM
9

lol okay maybe I can agree with this cunt just this once.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:05 PM
18

Yeah let's just ignore the fact that they are complicit in this culture of "rape" by their own admission.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:05 PM
1

To be fair even regular assault is defined in many jurisdictions to include verbal threat. That's why there's the phrase "assault and battery". They're two different things but usually go together. EDIT: Also I'm pretty sure there's no way to make most men even anonymously identify things that have happened to them as sexual assault even if they were under the legal definition. So I'm pretty sure those stats would be literally impossible to obtain accurately. But experience tells me that it's fa…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 06:55 PM
1

Same.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 06:54 PM
1

Good I want women to be more afraid of me, not less. Most of them can leave me the fuck alone forever for all I care.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 06:49 PM
6

She probably got her tits grabbed at a bar or something lol. Okay, technically that's sexual assault I guess but I've gotten worse from women "at least twice", myself. That's not even one percent of the reasons I could cite to try to justify being angry at women though. You aren't a victim because you got groped sorry.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:31 PM
6

Sexually assaulted "at least twice". "At least". Lol ok sure.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:15 PM
1

Lol I don't think Pence has once talked about that. It's just a meme bro.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 01:46 PM
11

Wait are these cunts well known? Who are they?
/r/MensRights20/03/18 05:03 AM
3

I don't try to bring about the results you might want, because those are impossible. You want women to stop having the power to use the state as their personal army against men? You can't do that if they have equal rights and opportunities. For example coeducation will always favor women and compromise men's fundamental rights (e.g. due process) in the name of women's security. That's just how humanity thinks: women's safety comes first, even before children's safety and human rights generally. …
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:53 AM
2

Umm, do they mean convicted? You don't get put on the sex offender registry just by being "accused".
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:21 AM
1

I fail to see how my attitude is what's wrong with modern politics, policies and laws vis-a-vis gender.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:20 AM
2

Do you think that a male bail bond agent would have felt such fear towards/contempt for the life of a female client as this bitch clearly did for the victim?
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:19 AM
2

Rights require responsibilities. Women will never have equal responsibliities.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:16 AM
2

Eh. I doubt he'd have been comfortable doing that but in principle your dad's right. I've had women squeeze my butt or even just my pecs before and I'll sometimes just grab their tits back lol. EDIT: Husband. Dunno why I was thinking you'd said dad.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:15 AM
2

I don't really see how you can deny that women have too many rights and that this was probably an inevitable result of letting them have the same opportunities as men. I know it's not comfortable for most people to admit but I have nothing standing in the way of recognizing the truth about these things, I guess since I don't have to pretend to like or respect most women in order to get laid.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:13 AM
3

Wow sounds like a shitty bar. I doubt that many gay bars would do that, even if they didn't agree with your complaint. There are even gay bars that have policies designed to discourage women from entering, including one I heard of where you have to strip down to your underwear (a top is allowed) before entering and you have to take even those off if you want to play pool. God I want to go there.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:10 AM
3

I saw that. I can only hope that their point was to criticize the absurd "rights" argument for forcing bakers to bake cakes for purposes with which they have principled disagreements (taking away multiple First Amendment rights from them). The episode certainly seemed to be lampooning identity politics, but at the same time said a bunch of trite bullshit about Trump supporters. Maybe that was just the only way they could get it greenlit.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:08 AM
0

idgaf
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:06 AM
5

I was gonna say this.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:03 AM
15

There's an unfortunate misconception that gays and feminism have a symbiotic relationship. In fact the feminist establishment has historically opposed gay men's rights in many ways (take a look at this series or this speech), and only jumped on the Pride bandwagon in '71 when NOW figured out that lesbians are gay. Today I find that gay guys are either feminists or they're like you and me. Absolutely savage and with no patience for women's nonsense. My fiancé is the same way, though not to the sa…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 12:42 AM
-1

Reading the description of the book on Amazon legitimately solidified my belief that women's liberation was never not a mistake.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 09:47 PM
5

My soulmate <3
/r/MensRights19/03/18 09:32 PM
2

It really doesn't. This is supposedly an extreme version.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 07:54 PM
4

I've heard that in Saudi Arabia and perhaps other Muslim countries they practice such severe male "circumcision" that men are often just barely capable of ejaculating, but it's essentially joyless. Can anyone confirm?
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:04 AM
7

Silly billy. It's only sexual misconduct if menz
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:02 AM
2

It really doesn't make any sense that women seem to hate cheating more than men. Male cheaters are less likely to leave than female cheaters, and men don't get preggers.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 10:05 PM
3

I remember when I was taking a psychology class in college the textbook said women are actually more likely to be emotionally abusive. This makes sense considering their propensity for relational aggression in interactions with each other.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 08:43 PM
2

I'm fuckin dying.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 06:12 AM
1

Men do choose higher-risk jobs, and that's honestly partly biological. (Testosterone is correlated with risk taking.) But this fact does not lend itself to feminist dogma. Positions of considerable power within companies and within societies are also extremely high-risk. Politicians receive huge amounts of public scrutiny. CEOs are responsible for the interests of shareholders and customers as well as employees. Etc. So you could really use this point to say that having more men in power than wo…
/r/MensRights15/03/18 05:15 AM
3

Moreover, a 2009 study by Patricia H. Hawley at the University of Kansas found that the more socially dominant a woman was, the more likely she was to enjoy fantasies of sexual submission. I believe the same goes for men, tbh. From what I know about closeted gay men/"straight" men who use Craigslist, etc., for "discreet" hookups with other men, the most submissive ones are the ones seen as "men's men" by the outside world. As a rule, you can pretty reliably predict how sexually submissive a man …
/r/MensRights13/03/18 08:57 PM
2

I agree but unfortunately, if the sexes had been reversed male-Katie Perry would have been accused of sexual harassment at the very least for even asking "her" to give "him" a kiss. After all, muh power imbalance. Where is the outrage from all the feminists who love to claim that when one party has more authority and influence than the other, consent is definitionally impossible?
/r/MensRights13/03/18 08:50 PM
2

A while back I was watching Ellen (don't ask why) and Sophia Vergara was her guest. They had this segment where Ellen would stand behind her and put her arms through the sleeves of her jacket or something and act as her "arms", and at one point Ellen squeezed Sophia's boobs without warning. Really sent home the difference in accountability between men and women.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 08:47 PM
1

I dunno. I think that may be an excessively uncharitable interpretation. A man doesn't have to have or even want to have a woman to want to be self-sufficient and capable of providing for himself and potentially a family, protecting himself and his loved ones, etc. This article actually sort of criticizes patriarchy theory by blaming it for the denigration of this value.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:23 PM
3

I guess I should've, but the article itself is pretty good.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:05 PM
1

But I don't claim to know what makes women look good, let alone "fabulous", though lol. I'm just baffled by it. Seems like 99% of their beauty can be removed with a wet wipe. Men's physical beauty is a reflection of the actual work they put in as well as their genes, health and how much testosterone their bodies used during puberty so to me it's just a much more objectively noble aesthetic. I guess I'm mad as hell at the whole "lucky kid" attitude in these cases cuz I hadn't even started jacking…
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:03 PM
4

So right off the bat she confessed to public indecency in front of the police. Good start.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 10:41 PM
3

As a gay man I'm baffled by how low-to-nonexistent the standards for what makes women "hot" are. Like for real. Her face is super plain looking, but then all women's faces are to me. And then it's like, "Oh she's not fat." Okay, but if she were you'd just be like "T H I C C." Truth is females aren't held to actual aesthetic standards by males, in pretty much any species.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 10:12 PM
46

Don't be silly, Title IX is only for females 🙄
/r/MensRights07/02/18 03:06 AM
4

This is insane. I expected it would be about the exact opposite judging from the title but it seems Australia's truly beyond hope. Do people really believe we live in a world where women are likely to be improperly identified as the primary aggressor? EDIT: "My recently completed research explores the experiences of female respondents to family violence intervention orders through the perceptions of eight Melbourne-based family violence lawyers. " Yeah that's sure to yield objective and impartia…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 04:56 AM
1

This makes me want to look for two random women having a conversation on a topic with which I have barely passing familiarity and loudly inject myself with a patronizing tone.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:41 AM
3

So it's basically teaching men to act like mean girls.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:20 AM
33

"I thought being a feminist was about giving women the freedom to choose." Hahaha, oh, no, sweet summer child. We can't let women choose because they choose wrong. I mean look at the Nordic countries, where they have all that choice and far too few are interested in entering STEM and dismantling its oppressive patriarchy. Women. Choosing. The idea. No this is why we like the Islamic countries. They're much more feminist.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 01:40 AM
1

https://youtu.be/x-Zj-buRsvA This is one of them. She doesn't mention gay men here but does other times she talks about this. She talks about how we view situations that women might claim are "date rape", as simple failures of communication. Which is true. I've been in at least a couple situations that under feminist and possibly some legal definitions would give me a plausible case for claiming I was raped or at least assaulted but I don't consider them that. Anyway from what I've seen, Paglia …
/r/MensRights13/11/17 12:46 AM
1

She had a few points but basically the rules of sexual engagement fundamentally changed due to the sexual revolution and too many women (and increasingly men, I fear) have failed to recognize it and kinda want to have their cake and eat it too: this new sexual liberty but the same immunity from negative sexual experiences (not actually rape or even assault except maybe under imo some misguided laws) as before. She talks about how pretty much the only ones who have a proper grasp of realistic pos…
/r/MensRights12/11/17 11:04 PM
1

So is this based on studies?
/r/MensRights12/11/17 10:09 PM
1

Not that I'm particularly interested in defending Takei cuz he kinda made his bed in this situation, but there is a difference between grabbing people by the cock "against their will" and grabbing it without knowing how they'd respond. This has a lot to do with the mores of the gay male community. I've never had a problem with it. I would have a problem with female histrionics ruining our fun. Have you heard what Camille Paglia has said about this? It's pretty right on.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 09:54 PM
2

Well, good luck learning the identities of false accusers in the UK. They're kept anonymous even if they're convicted of false accusation. They should be put on a registry. See how they like having to go around every new neighborhood they move to to tell them how toxic they are.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 09:36 PM
1

How exactly does all caps make it harder to read?
/r/MensRights12/11/17 09:02 PM
1

On the toplessness issue, there has never been a time in my life when I would have given a fuck if women were allowed to be topless in places where men are allowed the same liberty. But when it comes down to it, what does it really mean that women have to "cover up" on top more than men? In most places where this is still the law, it simply means covering a couple extra square inches. If a man and a woman were to go out in public wearing the bare minimum they legally could in these places, the m…
/r/MensRights12/11/17 08:28 PM
18

I think a critical point is approaching where conspiracies of false or frivolous accusations are the weapon of choice for women who want to teach men at all levels of social power a lesson.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 06:05 PM
5

I don't think it's remotely fair to judge someone like that for not wanting to see himself as a victim, or to use his childhood victimization as evidence to condemn him for sexual predation.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 05:58 PM
5

I weep for "men" like that. Hopefully they wake up someday. I really don't feel like "women categorically have it worse on all fronts" is a claim that most people with a healthy relationship with reality would make these days (since like 2013 which seems to have been a tipping point from most people being at best blissfully ignorant of this kind of SJW rhetoric, to being assaulted with it so regularly and seeing it so poorly defended by even attempted evidence use that even the most apolitical a…
/r/MensRights08/11/17 10:52 PM
2

Gold digging thots who couldn't give less of a fuck about a man damaging his brain cuz the fact that they're using it as part of a battering ram against other men's brains gets them wet.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 07:12 AM
3

Nah.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 08:29 PM
3

Second most is any given other race of women.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 07:30 PM
1

You could make the same argument against literally any workplace regulation. "Well if someone's willing to work under these conditions..."
/r/MensRights12/07/17 12:55 AM
2

Literally worked to death. I'd expect this here in America tbh, since we really don't have any respect for the necessity of sleep anymore. I guess I'm naive: every country still condones this barbarism no matter how much noise they make on workers' rights. Maybe we need to start focusing on the fact that it is a public health hazard; repeatedly getting that little sleep is no different from being blind fucking drunk all the time.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 06:58 PM
1

WOO! 4+ years running! Men rule! 😂
/r/MensRights11/07/17 06:52 PM
2

Silly Canadacucks with their alternative facts. Only Germany has made more official spaces formally available than Canada. Just under one million Syrians, though, have sought asylum in European countries, meaning they've travelled on their own and have claimed refugee status upon arrival. Some have UN refugee status, some don't. "Made more official spaces formally available" is the most squirrelly data-mining language I've ever heard. It doesn't justify your claim that you've "taken in more" Syr…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 07:41 PM
1

Lmao lamb dressed as mutton.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 06:23 PM
1

It is though. Plus I've heard a couple people say the song's one of their favorites just this past week. It's a sign! P r a i s e K e k !!
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 06:19 PM
5

Maybe those people are ruining the city/country/continent/western world. Ever thought of that you dumb bitch? "Oh all the locals think there's a problem. They must just not be as enlightened as I am as a Canadian who lives far from the epicenter of the refugee crisis."
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 06:10 PM
1

That ancap filter tho
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 06:06 PM
0

You know what' freaky? Just before this I watched the music video for The Animals' House of the Rising Sun and then it was playing at the beginning of this video. Not really relevant to the story, which obviously makes me want to kill things, but the synchronicity is out of control lately. This timeline's going insane.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 05:45 PM
2

2014 What a strange time. Just three short years ago and yet...the world seems to have been so much more blue pilled.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 12:43 AM
2

I'm gay and thinking that it looks better cut is super fucking straight. Straight women might think so in America but then, women are sheep, so...
/r/MensRights06/07/17 12:39 AM
3

Is this that famed female empathy I hear so much about? Oh wait, I suppose that's reserved for groups that they view as basically their surrogate children/pets.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 12:27 AM
1

Being able to troll competently and get people to laugh (and not at us) is probably the thing we need to work on most as a movement tbh.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 12:22 AM
6

How could women possibly be owed reparations even if they had been treated unjustly? Women and men come from the same families ffs
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:41 PM
4

That's their level of thinking. Awfully generous to call it thinking tbh.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 07:10 AM
3

How? We don't really control that. The media are the ones who control whether their consumers conflate the MRM with those groups and they have historically been psychopathically dishonest and ruthless so far and there's no reason to think they ever won't be.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 06:28 AM
15

troof Plus doesn't Cassie Jaye no longer consider herself a feminist? Cassie Jaye is bae. Cassie Bae. Cassie Jaye is primo waifu material. And it's Cassie Okay, I'm not objectifying Cassie Jaye. I'm gay. Cassie Gay.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 05:02 PM
1

I am fully on board with what you're saying. My first post on this subreddit (on a different account, now deactivated, but I could probably find the post if you'd want) was about feminism's phobic, neurotic opposition to male homosociality and the effects of that opposition on gay men and our cultures. It was stickied for a while. See, I realized years ago that an alliance of gay men and the MRM was only logical. I noticed feminists going after bears and leftists in general going after gay men's…
/r/MensRights22/06/17 07:15 AM
20

Which is why they still marry up so men can pay their debts off and they don't have to worry about it like those evil, overly empowered, undereducated menz.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 10:14 PM
1

Fucking piece of shit. The rapist and this troll defending her. And saying she's not a pedophile? Having sex with an 8-year-old—pre-pubescent—boy literally makes you a pedophile under the strictest definition which definitely ain't the definition used when people accuse men of being pedophiles for fucking a girl who lied about her age when she was a fucking hour away from being 18. Nobody can honestly believe this has anything to do with patriarchy. EDIT: I thought dropmycumberbritches might jus…
/r/MensRights02/06/17 03:36 PM
2

I wish I could believe this. I mean life would be a lot easier for me if I were a moron.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 03:18 PM
1

^ Reasons to be anti-feminist if you're gay or any other minority
/r/MensRights03/05/17 10:04 PM
2

It's common sense. You don't refer to women as wrongdoers or to wrongdoers as women. Just like if there are multiple victims of both sexes you don't refer to any of them as men.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:42 PM
2

Not to my knowledge. It would probably upset our new feminist so-called allies.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 02:19 PM
14

Absolutely reprehensible. This women and the entire media culture which allows women to publish such unconscionably heinous thoughts without remark or consequence, are as bad as any bigoted screed in history, and the cultural/political climates that normalized it. It is no exaggeration to say that the propaganda that is regularly used against half the population these days is as bad as anything the Nazis wrote about the Jews or any of their other "undesirable" or "antisocial" classes. There is n…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 04:23 AM
3

Yeah but that's the way it's SUPPOSED to be. "Mantrums" are like "man buns" or "murses", etc. It's bad/needs to be pointed out because it's supposed to be the other way around.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 03:56 PM
2

When a woman doesn't get her way she'll just start a half-century movement to normalize the dehumanization of half the species.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 03:53 PM
4

"The suffering of women in countries like India" where, what? 3/4 of so-called rapes are cases where marriage was promised and then backed out on, or similar "deception" was used (i.e. cases that would not count as rape anywhere in the west); yet the women still feel "less safe" than, say, American women? Maybe because it's so fucking tradcon it encourages women's neuroses and paranoid delusions even more than they are encouraged in the most feminist Reich on earth? To the extent that women feel…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 02:16 AM
6

Men have it as bad as women but people don't care...meaning men have it far worse than women. Always have always will.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:54 PM
1

But the benefit of not caring is that you don't care whether it's bad that you don't care, so no rational man would choose the alternative of both caring and having to care that it's bad to care but not being able to do anything about it.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:52 PM
2

I swear to Allah I will beat you with my shoe.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:35 AM
14

Dear god. Bitch does he even have a penis anymore? I suppose you don't care. 😒
/r/MensRights01/03/17 11:46 PM
2

Fair enough to say that male predation is the meme that seems to be implicitly informing what he said, but it isn't like he articulated that or expressly denied that any other combination would be unthinkable. I just think we shouldn't join in the crucifixion of Milo over the way he chooses to process his own experiences.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:27 AM
2

I recognize that that's a problem, but I don't think it's fair to say Milo thinks it ONLY works one way.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:24 AM
3

You don't think that that could happen with ALL combinations of gender (precocious girl taking advantage of vulnerable man or woman, precocious boy taking advantage of vulnerable man or woman)? Just, categorically impossible, on principle?
/r/MensRights22/02/17 02:14 AM
1

Reverse sexism? You mean sexism. Men are a sex too hurr durr
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:00 PM
3

That's what I was thinking too.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:31 PM
1

Okay but in this case I really do think it's going a bit far to define rape by absence of consent (rather than coercion or force or ignoring protests) but not count passionate kissing as consent. I mean to hear feminists tell it, that woman could later have sex with that man and even though he believed through her actions that she was consenting every step of the way, could call him a rapist and allege she was "too scared" to vocalize or otherwise demonstrate her lack of consent, and how dare we…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 05:34 AM
14

60% before the false reporting of rape as we know it.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 05:28 AM
-7

Trolling is a 100% legitimate tactic well in keeping with the western liberal tradition.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 06:55 PM
2

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 06:53 PM
4

It would still be funny but yeah it'd probably lead to an outcry. Also men are more attractive so it wouldn't be as hot. Think that covers all the differences.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 05:14 PM
-3

poisons the well tells us to think critically Think logically.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 04:56 PM
3

Ze must be reincarnated as a black asexual panromantic disabled otherkin of I WILL FUCKING KILL MYSELF! DO YOU UNDERSTAND ME? FIX THIS, BBC!
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:32 AM
11

Wonder how many takes it took for him to be able to say that without laughing.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:19 AM
1

I've tried that. They're virtually all too dense to even understand and respond to the point. Or they just don't read it.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 03:31 PM
12

Interesting. I wonder if this is partly because men's aesthetic preferences are not dictated by what's normative as much as women's.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 02:41 PM
1

What the fuck?
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:30 AM
1

Elite Daily is the lowest energy troll site ever.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 01:35 AM
1

Look at all these women totally lacking self-awareness: "Assault is bad! There is literally nothing that I need your permission to do to you, from hitting you to surrounding you and aggressively restricting your movement!"
/r/MensRights22/01/17 10:27 PM
1

Hug rape. Definitely hug rape.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 10:24 PM
1

I'd be surprised if this woman even knows who the father is.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 10:20 PM
1

This is why age of consent laws are just fundamentally a bad idea. You should be able to tell if someone was taken advantage of because of their immaturity and if a sexual encounter was abusive and if the perpetrator is a menace to vulnerable kids, without basing it on age in so black-and-white a way. I mean it's kind of a "you know it when you see it" sort of thing.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 06:47 PM
1

It's frivolous and disgraceful. They're just making themselves look even worse and more clueless. Millions of women and stupid men rehashing talking points which they do not realize have been debunked and ridiculed to death by normal society over the past two years, or which just no longer fly for various reasons.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 06:07 PM
1

I'm sure feminists will be fine with that since they hate populism.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 05:51 PM
2

"Your grandfather's generation probably had it pretty well. Well, grow up." This childish fucking bitch. Yeah, my grandfather had it REALLY well, getting to help liberate France from the Nazis, get blown up on their own soil or on beaches or tortured mercilessly in POW camps. What lucky bastards! Fucking solipsistic little girl! Fuck you and all women who think like you.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 11:50 PM
4

Sometimes it happens when they’re disproportionately affected ("Dozens killed in Aleppo; mostly women and children among the dead”), but even when men are disproportionately affected—which is very often—it’s still generally “women and children” whose victimization is singled out. And then sometimes the sexism it's so plausibly justified by deceitful wording even the people who are aware of this bias are fooled. The bolded part above is an example: women and children combined made up more than ha…
/r/MensRights21/01/17 08:16 PM
5

For me it was a similar situation (actually many situations, come to think of it) at a bar (a gay bar, no less). I'm sure it's nothing compared to what men, including my oldest brother, have experienced in family courts, though.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 05:59 AM
1

Wow what an edgy message...for the mid-19th century maybe. Thanks for that, George Sand. Guess we can look forward to a riveting piece on the need to reform coverture laws next. Feminism: beating horses that died before feminism was even a thing.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:59 PM
3

Guess I'd have to punch my boyfriend in the face and her in the uterus.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:55 PM
0

Increasingly feeling like they are, actually.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:42 PM
51

And now you see how lynchings happened.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:40 PM
1

Mine too!
/r/MensRights15/01/17 11:15 PM
1

Chris Pratt wouldn't have to coerce me. Even if he did wake me up ninety years early to die with him on a spaceship, I'd be okay with that.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 05:17 PM
12

Lol this is the first I've heard of this upcoming feminist flop. I'm sure watching its abject failure will be every bit as satisfying as not watching the newest Ghostbusters. Now let's talk about how men are apparently annoying for asking women questions they could Google the answer to. So if you do this—let's call it "manquiring"—you're assuming it's women's job to know everything, I take it, which I'm sure women will argue is misogynistic (somehow)? But then they complain about "mansplaining" …
/r/MensRights13/01/17 05:15 PM
4

No way Chubby Hubby isa bomb flavor.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 05:10 PM
3

Yeah it's old but the controversy is new only because we are more conscious now of the non-feminist and even anti-feminist side of the issue and, whether we recognize it or not, the feminists are losing. Slowly but surely. You know damn well they couldn't get away with this now.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 06:08 AM
2

But...one gender is more responsible and always will be. That's just a descriptive statement of human reality.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 06:01 AM
1

I really don't see how anything in that article mitigates the absurdity of the poster and the systematic sexism it exemplifies.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 06:00 AM
8

"SCUM will kill all men who are not in the Men's Auxiliary of SCUM. Men in the Men's Auxiliary are those men who are working diligently to eliminate themselves, men who, regardless of their motives, do good, men who are playing pall with SCUM. A few examples of the men in the Men's Auxiliary are: men who kill men; biological scientists who are working on constructive programs, as opposed to biological warfare; journalists, writers, editors, publishers and producers who disseminate and promote id…
/r/MensRights12/01/17 04:54 AM
1

The ticketing isn't a men's rights issue. It's the fact that feminists claim that rape is treated uniquely because people are instructed on how not to be victims of it, and they use the notion that this constitutes misogynistic "victim blaming" to argue that we live in a patriarchy where women are specially oppressed. But laws like this prove that that is not unique to rape. This law is about teaching people not to be victims of car theft. So the fact that we tell people (not just women, actuall…
/r/MensRights12/01/17 04:25 AM
0

Both pieces of advice can be reasonably argued.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 01:18 AM
1

When a bitch's reaction to cheating makes it perfectly clear why someone would cheat on her in the first place.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 02:25 PM
10

Men are more capable of effective violence. In this case our generally greater physical abilities are used against us. Absurdly, our generally greater physical abilities are also used against us when women commit violence against us. The upshot is almost all violence is seen as a "male problem", for males to fix. Like everything else.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 03:45 AM
2

Prosecutors trying to disguise their boundless greed as concern for justice and public safety.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 04:27 PM
1

Lol that is hilariously poorly worded. "Men cannot grab you. It is a physical impossibility. Never again shall you feel the embrace of a male lover."
/r/MensRights08/01/17 02:14 AM
1

Good for America.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 01:56 AM
3

Women don't usually instinctively empathize with men the way men are instinctively concerned for women's experiences. They need to make a conscious effort to understand that men are even people. So there is no communicating any of this to a woman who hasn't already figured out on her own, from a theoretical/intellectual framework, that men can be hurt as badly as women, and just as easily.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 08:57 PM
4

Male privilege: having your parents and doctors care enough to remove a majority of your most sensitive genital skin when you're an infant.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 09:57 PM
7

"Slavery in America was racism against white plantation owners who were seen as unable to manage without help from a superior race."
/r/MensRights06/01/17 09:53 PM
1

I'm so confused lol
/r/MensRights06/01/17 09:48 PM
3

And people say it's only the "third wave" that's the problem. sigh Every problem with feminism is the inevitable result of what feminism has always been.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 05:45 PM
1

It is annoying that that article doesn't compare current voting tendencies among women and men. I don't know what the key issues for the French left vs. right would have been up until the '90s, when it shows men's and women's votes sorta converging. I'll bet anything it's flipped today.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 04:38 PM
2

Exactly! More than that, the government's "tolerance" of this "cultural enrichment" is pandering to a female mindset. "Tend and befriend."
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:50 PM
5

If you keep your eyes and ears open you'll find stuff like this to be very instructive regarding female nature.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 05:38 PM
16

I think a nation has the right to do something to prevent its culture from being infiltrated and altered by incompatible cultures.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 05:34 PM
6

What the fuck? She says that her experience as a "researcher" suggests that 1/5 mothers molests her son sexually. Is this just a weirdly obsessive troll?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 05:01 PM
3

I mean none of the things mentioned implies a detraction from our idolization of mothers. In fact it would make it a lot easier for women if men took care of the kids more than society still sorta expects them to.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 12:05 AM
6

I'm sorry to be a wet blanket but does everyone else really not see this as perfunctory and forced, like an attempt to hijack men's issues and the narrative around them now that that has gained some cultural prevalence, to infiltrate it in the name of feminism rather than to respect men's issues as a separate domain from women's issues? Don't tell me you haven't seen this sort of thing countless times from feminists. They pay lip service to empathy for men (which 99% of the time they are incapab…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 12:03 AM
1

Gynocentrism is a whole different beast from racism and other forms of tribalism.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 11:34 PM
1

Yeah I think there is some research on the happiness of people of different orientations but it seems kinda murky. Apparently some studies do show that gay men are happier but it is heavily influenced by where they live. Other studies suggest gays are less happy. Just from a quick Google search.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 11:31 PM
5

Women are literally angels. Ugh. Fuck gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 09:01 PM
1

I'm about to cry...
/r/MensRights30/12/16 05:19 AM
2

Lmfao. Cute.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 02:41 AM
1

This study was conducted in the '80s? I don't know that I've ever heard of it.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 04:37 PM
2

What the fuck is wrong with both of them? Even though this is super stagey. Why would you think the idea of putting your boyfriend's junk in a mousetrap while he sleeps is cute and funny? See, this is why I can't take feminists seriously when they say rape jokes cause rape. Given their theory that jokes about things normalize those things, why is it only rape that they have a problem with? Oh, because it's the one violent crime from which they think women suffer more than men. Why are jokes abou…
/r/MensRights23/12/16 11:28 PM
2

This right here. This is why I've only ever dated men and will only ever date men.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 11:12 PM
2

Concern troll: "You guys, why are we becoming just an anti-feminist sub? I mean why are we focusing the privileges that women get instead of the rights that men don't have? There's totally room in an egalitarian world for evaluations of women's behavior that are more charitable than those of men's. It isn't men's right to be treated as well as women."
/r/MensRights16/12/16 08:35 AM
10

Not old enough to make mature sexual decisions. Old enough to have raped a consenting girl by virtue of her inability to make mature sexual decisions. Because penis.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 08:26 AM
1

I love how the cunt reporter is offended at the idea of men feeling uncomfortable or self-conscious around women but when the gym owner says men make his clients uncomfortable they prop his business up as an example of a reasonable gender exclusion. (For the record I'm fine with both, as are all sane people.)
/r/MensRights10/12/16 11:03 PM
2

Lol that was my first thought. These bimbos actually think Lysistrata was a true story. And that prohibition happened cuz a bunch of sexless old schoolmarm types closed their legs. 😂 This is fucking sad. The height of grandiose delusion.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 10:48 PM
4

It was always controlled and regulated more strictly than female sexuality. Still is.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 06:39 PM
32

Women's feelings are probably the worst possible measure of objective reality there is.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 05:49 AM
3

Oh my god. This is what happens when you assume every "gap" is an inherently bad thing worth spending time, money and energy to fix.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:08 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:07 AM
3

Lol that's kinda clever. But since the class already knows the topic idk that it'd work. Then again feminists are pretty fuckin slow.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 10:57 PM
6

Lmfao is this real? Source? That doesn't even make enough sense to be a joke. It's just funny if they were really stupid enough to design, okay, print and distribute this.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 09:09 PM
3

If you point out that they are mistreated because they are men, and therefore because they're not women, people will always be able to say you hate women. It's going to happen. Especially in a class that laughed at the research topic. I would probably just respond by pointing out that that an accusation of sexism is not an argument and that if they have no argument to counter the one presented then they have to concede OP's points or else admit that objective reality is sexist and go on railing …
/r/MensRights08/12/16 07:31 PM
16

How would you demonstrate bias against men without comparing them to women? <_<
/r/MensRights08/12/16 06:05 PM
2

Nope. Didn't.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 06:00 PM
3

Some small steps are closer to big steps than are others. We've already seen people like Cathy Young chip away at the feminist façade of mainstream media and shine light through. The more attention the crime of forcing men to penetrate gets, the more men (plus a few reasonable women) will become absolutely disgusted at the sexist lies about rape as an expression of uniquely male sexual aggression. This is going to be a big paradigm shift.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:54 PM
4

We don't care. You're naive if you think any men's movement is going to get anywhere by being agreeable, by winning over the hearts of the public. As though most can ever be made to have sympathy for men so long as oh, we simply learn to say the right things and not say the wrong things and associate with "good people" and not "bad people". Any other demands? Maybe we just need to avoid thinking incorrectly and just learn to frame everything in terms of the dominant academic feminist framework s…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:44 PM
1

It may not be the actual reason why female leaders tend to be more militarily aggressive than male leaders, but it is actually the explanation which is most charitable to women and one which feminist types consequently tend to prefer. But if you'd prefer, we can say women are simply more prone to power trips and wantonly disposing of men's lives. It really doesn't matter why it's the case that female leaders behave how they do, though, because it doesn't change the fact that they do behave that …
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:10 PM
1

Your argument defeats itself. If men were never seriously compelled to work for others because they could always hunt and grow their own food, then women weren't either because they could always do the same. If a woman wanted the autonomy of a man, she could always stay single. Then she could be a shopkeep, a blacksmith, a hunter...she had any number of "choices" that didn't require the approval of a husband. Plenty of women did all these things prior to or without the help of feminism. (Though …
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:01 PM
1

The problem is the superior leadership aptitude of men is something that our enemies will believe in long after we have talked ourselves out of believing in it and elected a female Commander in Chief. Which is why we'd need to demonstrate even greater military aggression than we otherwise would simply to be taken seriously by the people we need to take us seriously. (This is borne out historically.) Call it sexism but it isn't sexism which any culture has a monopoly on. It really is human nature…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 05:29 AM
3

Patriarchy is the only system that works for civilization. Are you afraid that, once women get power, they'll exercise it entirely on themselves and not use any of it for men's benefit? Why? Because of "natural instincts?" Please. Show me some science to back that up Well there's this for starters.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 05:20 AM
2

And yes, it does still sound like a good deal. I'm not saying it would be for everyone, and it's not a matter of correct or incorrect priorities but of temperament. I'm not interested in hyper-aggressive competition and actually like the idea of a good man having power and authority over me in many ways and I don't see it as degrading at all to submit to somebody a man worthy of submitting to. If I had been a married woman and really couldn't control my own income (though I would have been able …
/r/MensRights08/12/16 05:03 AM
1

> The entire system is set up on the belief that one party is superior Or maybe that they are just different? Sure there were things men were seen to be better at (and things they really are better at) and things women were seen to be better at (and that they really are better at) but to say one sex was seen as globally "superior" just because they were seen as more authoritative and more suited to earn a living is an anachronistic value judgment. The division of labor was something women believ…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:47 AM
2

Not all of them, but virtually only them. And enough of them that any given workplace with enough of them will have an unacceptable amount of that behavior.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 01:53 AM
6

No it really doesn't seem like oppression of women when you consider that married men had to provide for their families and were legally responsible for their wives' actions. It seems like making married women have to get their husbands' permission to do many things is a reasonable protection against excessive risk that a man might not want to take on, given the unreasonable social and legal systems at the time. So I won't say jt was all fair but it was meant to at least be balanced, so that men…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 01:50 AM
2

I have to say it seems to just be their nature. The kind of snipey social aggression and sabotage they engage in is something you will virtually never see men engage in. Well, straight men at least. It would be shameful to them, and rightly so. Gay men are often just as devoid of a sense of integrity. And I say that as a gay man. I'm fed up with femininity frankly. Masculine codes of behavior are just objectively better for the public and professional spheres.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 01:28 AM
2

They're no better in any workplace, as my brother and my boyfriend can attest. My brother has been the target of at least one workplace conspiracy by a bunch of insecure and petty women when he was a physical therapist, and my boyfriend works in a vet clinic with all women and they are almost all cliquish, passive-aggressive cunts and those who aren't either quit or want to quit.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 01:01 AM
5

Of course women could own property without their husbands' permission...if they didn't have husbands. Pretty intellectually dishonest to conflate "women" with "married women". Nobody was like, "Oh we hate women so they shouldn't be able to own property. Who wants to see a female tavern owner? Gross!" Do you imagine men were ever like, "I'm gonna work in the mines and not see my family for most of the time because it's awesome and I'm awesome because I'm a 'first-class citizen'," and women were l…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 12:53 AM
1

Not my point. But I agree.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 12:18 AM
6

Yup. It's pure delusion. This is what a professional bullshitter gets when she gets high on her own supply. And it's rampant on the left these days. The idiotic question "Why don't they just sign up for nursing degrees?" is only the tip of an ideological iceberg wholly divorced from reality, as working men's spiritual transmigration into RNs and home health aids and daycare workers would only be an intermediate step in the realization of an even more utopian vision. There is no real rationality …
/r/MensRights07/12/16 05:07 PM
1

Brokebsck Mountain?
/r/MensRights07/12/16 02:48 PM
5

You still can't really understand the phobia because you're plagued with the toxic male trait of rational thought.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 02:43 PM
1

"Satanic"?
/r/MensRights07/12/16 02:42 PM
1

An explosive one at that.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 02:41 PM
1

I don't think they understand the idea of taking one for the team or why it is done.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 02:40 PM
5

Agreed. Too many of our fellow gay men express a wish to see manhood destroyed, parrot feminist dogma and let it turn them against their fellow men, even though they shamelessly fetishize the men they claim to hate. Granted, I shamelessly fetishize the men they claim to hate, too. 😏
/r/MensRights06/12/16 02:52 AM
6

Apparently pointing out that this isn't gendered is a "deflection" from rather than a counter to the assertion that it is.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 06:38 PM
2

We've been brainwashed to believe it's misogynistic to say, but mathematically it makes sense that at least half would be false. Like all violent crimes, rape is probably vastly underreported, so the crime of false accusation would have to be vastly less common than the crime of rape for anywhere close to all accusations to be true. (100% of false reports are reported, while much less than 100% of rapes are reported.) And feminists love to pretend being falsely accused of rape is inherently not …
/r/MensRights02/12/16 04:16 PM
1

Oh but don't worry, they're gonna "think about" abolishing the draft altogether. In this edition of "Things That Will Never Happen"...
/r/MensRights02/12/16 04:04 PM
1

So they're only aiming it at boys during only those years (give or take) when they are smaller and weaker and less sexually mature and less advanced in physiological and neurological development than girls are? Good. Teach them when they're young to resent the assumption that women are always victims even when they are in positions of power over them.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 03:55 PM
2

See, the thing about silencing men that makes it a bad idea is...you can't. Feminists have no idea the can of worms they're opening up. Willfully creating a society of angry men—even if they're seen by most as "not real men" (see the gays in the '60s)—is a suicidal thing for any movement, ideology or government to do. But go ahead and keep enjoying those "male tears" and calling masculinity toxic and "fragile", feminists. I honestly hope you never let up until you are stamped out.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 03:21 PM
15

Jesus. "How dare his instincts be correct!" Fucking crazy people, some of these broads. The shit straight men must put up with...
/r/MensRights01/12/16 05:03 AM
2

I like the pee smell fuck off feminists. You can take my bathroom but you can never take...my peedom!
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:22 PM
3

And here we see an example of how women are "conditioned" to be"assertive": they're "conditioned" to "assert" their vulnerability and complain about bullshit. Which is why it's called bitching. Men are "conditioned" not to think about themselves but to be stoical and, conveniently enough for feminists, to care about women even when they don't care about them. The two main character traits of the traditional male that feminism exploits more than anything else.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:08 PM
3

"Trans men are real men!" "No men allowed! Trans men are fine."
/r/MensRights28/11/16 06:59 PM
1

Ha but how would you know you're not looking at Croatian then?
/r/MensRights26/11/16 08:27 PM
1

Me? Nope. I'm from Kansas haha.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 08:21 PM
9

I think you mean "No True Feminist..."
/r/MensRights26/11/16 04:24 AM
2

That's not New Zealand?
/r/MensRights25/11/16 11:13 PM
2

Lmfao
/r/MensRights25/11/16 11:13 PM
126

"There are still men in medicine, and that is a terrible injustice to women."
/r/MensRights25/11/16 08:18 PM
7

It was basically just all the w's and y's that gave it away. Can't read a word of Welsh myself.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 08:11 PM
39

It looks like Welsh to me or a related language.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 06:12 PM
2

And use her lazy attempt to pass herself off as a professor, as a case in point!
/r/MensRights24/11/16 06:56 PM
1

Telling students to just accept dogma and to research proof of it on their own initiative if they are interested is literally not being a professor. That isn't how education works. Call her out on being an imposter.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 06:54 PM
1

Shocked, shocked. Hypocrisy? Isn't that a bit below feminists? /s
/r/MensRights24/11/16 03:53 PM
1

In other news...
/r/MensRights24/11/16 03:00 PM
3

"Stand up and speak out." "Okay, I disagree with your narra—" "SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP"
/r/MensRights24/11/16 04:34 AM
4

Oh fuck I didn't mean to delete that comment. Damn I need to go to bed. But yes I agree. There are many good reasons for patriarchy. Feminists themselves frequently demonstrate most of them...by accident.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 04:19 AM
1

Are you okay?
/r/MensRights24/11/16 04:09 AM
1

That's like saying "So you're actually a Communist." It's absurd for a tiny, tiny (yet admittedly influential) ideological minority to appropriate values that nearly everyone holds and say "We actually invented this and it's the only thing that you need to believe to be part of our group so you are one of us even if you find us all fucking reprehensible." That isn't how language works! The meanings and implications of words cannot be dictated by tiny clubs of academics and media cunts who disagr…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 12:57 AM
11

You're naive. What, do you think it's a coincidence that the names of the accused are always published even after the accusation is known to be false, but the names of known rape hoaxers are never published? No. It's standard journalistic practice and it is unethical as fuck. It's even against the law to publish the names of false accusers in some countries, including the UK.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 12:35 AM
4

Lol she has penis envy like all academic-type feminists. I had so many female professors in college who'd call everything from a spear to a sovereign's staff to a skyscraper, a "phallic symbol". They are obsessed with what we've got between our legs. And I can't blame them. Only laugh, cuz they're sad.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 01:10 PM
2

"His story! RrrreeeeeEEEEEE."
/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:51 PM
3

Several of the clips they showed as examples of manspreading involved situations where it was clearly physically impossible for the man not to spread without bringing his knees up in an extremely uncomfortable and unhealthy (bad for the lower back) position.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 03:11 AM
1

I don't consider the behavior we're talking about to be "offensive". Conversely, most women do consider sexual advances of any kind to be offensive when they don't just happen to appreciate them. So what's the difference?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 03:04 AM
8

Woof! I want that calendar. And yes, the hypocrisy is amazing isn't it?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 02:27 AM
1

In a workplace any sexual advance might be found to be illegal. I'm saying it shouldn't be. Not unless there is a explicit or reasonably inferable threat like you mentioned. It trivializes sexual crimes when you make out references to one's own body-parts to be a big deal. You said you're gay, and so am I. Doesn't being gay put us in a position to make any woman who tries this sort of thing, know what it's like for most men when they express interest in women? We have a valuable role to play in …
/r/MensRights20/11/16 10:45 PM
1

What didn't you understand that you are assuming "men" can't understand? Don't assume your own illiteracy is common to all "real men". Most geniuses are men.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 09:39 PM
1

Rape = non-consent + power /s
/r/MensRights20/11/16 09:26 PM
1

I mostly agree and I would definitely be pissed off if a woman threatened me or accused me like that. In my estimation false accusations of sexual harassment are on the level of pretty severe sexual assault in terms of how damaging they are to an individual and ultimately to society, and how severely we should discourage them. Still, I don't know that "Women waving their arse at you and rubbing it, asking if you like it" is significantly different from any other sort of advance. What do you mean…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 09:21 PM
1

> The age of consent here is 16, so 15 and 18 is illegal. > 16 and 40 is OK legally[...] > The law is not fallacious. Yeah, right.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 08:40 PM
1

It's truly bizarre when a cult that makes up less than 7% of a society can control the narrative that the entire society receives through the media and insist, contrary to everyone's senses, that it actually represents their values ("It just means equality for women!"). And no, I don't believe in equality "for women", because I know what the fuck that means, especially today. I believe in equality under the law, by default, for everybody. Simple as that. I don't think that gender-based discrimin…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 06:33 PM
5

It is a cult. They won't prevail in the end. You know that, right? The average person will never accept dogma like "non-binary people", "toxic masculinity", demonization of competition and other virtues that have built our civilization. The only reason these feminists can write so confidently and self-assuredly about their supposed moral superiority is that they are stuck in an echo chamber. They actively avoid interacting with people outside the cult, including, maybe especially, many groups wh…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 05:58 PM
1

Ugh this dyke troll again.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 05:38 PM
15

Worshipful idealization of women is the root cause of much chaos and well-intentioned evil and, dare I say, degeneracy. He is clearly blind to the irony that the type of moral worldview by which he judges women to be superior to men, was created by men. It relies on lofty ideas about rights and prescriptive principles that have been established and propagated in various cultures more or less independently yet always they were established and propagated by men. This stress on compassion and tende…
/r/MensRights19/11/16 05:57 AM
2

Suicide contagion is the most darkly fascinating phenomenon to me. It creates some unfortunate dilemmas. But I wonder if it would be less common if people had a good understanding of it.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 05:08 AM
2

I was afraid you'd say you felt responsible. But not surprised. That's not unusual you know. Being mistreated by someone you clearly at least used to love, and who maybe used to love you. Hard to conclude anything other than "I caused this." Think if you saw this sort of situation in someone else's relationship, though. Would you have the heart to blame the guy? I doubt it. I like what the Buddha (apparently) said that relates to this: if your compassion does not include yourself, it is incomple…
/r/MensRights18/11/16 12:36 AM
5

Good luck buddy. We're rooting for you!
/r/MensRights17/11/16 11:48 PM
2

I can't say I'm an expert at this but sometimes what you need is someone from the outside to state the obvious. Yes, I'd say what you're describing is a patently, extremely abusive relaionship, but instead of worrying about labels I'd ask: do you think you deserve to be treated like that? I mean, does anybody? If you were looking at it honestly from the outside, have you done anything that warrants such evil and abusive treatment? Like someone else said, start collecting evidence ASAP. Especiall…
/r/MensRights17/11/16 11:47 PM
2

I'm 26. I was 23 when our relationship started. But I wouldn't say I've got significantly more "authority" than when I was 17. Anyway, everything you say about ostensibly "power unbalanced" relationships applies equally to other relationships, except your conclusion (that blanket bans are justified) doesn't follow. The potential for harm in any type of intimate relationship is virtually infinite; clearly this is not grounds to prohibit all intimate relationships. Anyway you can't know anything a…
/r/MensRights17/11/16 09:31 PM
2

I never said abuse is trivial. The worry that it is especially hard to "prove" that a relationship is healthy if there is some sort of "power imbalance", is. You would prove it in the same exact ways you would for any other relationship.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 06:28 PM
4

I'm ashamed that he's white and male, too.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 05:27 PM
2

I find that worry trivial at best and that argument weak. It is precisely no more difficult to "prove" sincerity in such a relationship than in any other; one could always worry that there is some form or another of sinister coercion going on behind the scenes of a relationship, if one were neurotic enough.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 01:30 PM
1

Not invalid.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 01:37 AM
1

Ah. Weird. Thanks.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 10:54 PM
1

Playing both sides of the field. Nice.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 10:53 PM
2

The "post-" prefix implies that this was ever not the case. How very "post-truth".
/r/MensRights16/11/16 10:37 PM
12

Worst. Lottery. Ever.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 10:35 PM
2

'Swhat I'm sayin'.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 08:33 PM
1

So they were walking through the park naked? They probably should've waited to get to the beach.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 08:29 PM
4

Why is it automatically wrong for someone with more "authority" to have a relationship with someone with less? My boyfriend is 22 years older than me and I consider him to have more authority in general than I have, but it's a very well-balanced relationship.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 08:27 PM
6

I mean either way it's fucked up that the law seems to apply only to men.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 08:22 PM
1

So it was a public beach? Or just insufficiently secluded?
/r/MensRights16/11/16 08:21 PM
6

I can't read the article without subscribing. What was the issue if it was a nudist beach?
/r/MensRights16/11/16 06:56 PM
1

Then it should have died a century ago.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 12:34 PM
2

It's sad when it's "refreshing" when a federal act meant to ensure equal treatment of the sexes in education, results in anything even remotely approaching that lol
/r/MensRights16/11/16 12:30 PM
1

If they do, they are too weak for the public sphere and work force and women's liberation was a mistake. So feminists better pray the answer is a resounding "fuck no!"
/r/MensRights16/11/16 12:23 PM
1

But they're mostly not "cute" illnesses like women get. They might be things like gasp schizophrenia, or even psychopathy (which is an adaptation for many of these men considering their shit upbringings). But also not "cute" schizophrenia like when girls get it, or "empowering" psychopathy like in Gone Girl. Just problematic, masculine insanity.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 11:58 PM
1

Jealous. I didn't even have it as an option. Wish I'd been able to take home ec and shop.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 02:39 AM
12

This will definitely help men take women more seriously and stop viewing them as helpless and pathetic half-wits who need help from a higher authority.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 02:35 AM
1

Exactly! It's hilarious how women don't get this. They lament that men are so much less romantic than women, but for men, being "romantic" means giving (and giving without expection) whereas women's role in romance is only to receive—no reciprocity necessary. Ya think women might end up more attracted to their role in romance than men are to their own?
/r/MensRights15/11/16 01:04 AM
3

Modern women bitching about there being no men left, quite simply do not deserve men. They pretend to be equal to or even (morally) superior to men, and yet they will not even consider a relationship with a man who wants to be a homemaker rather than a professional—and yet, hmm, men historically had no problem marrying and devoting their energy to women who didn't work for a living. Hell, the top predictor of divorce is whether the man has a job, even controlling for the couple's income. It's al…
/r/MensRights15/11/16 12:57 AM
8

Wtf? If they're in a sexual relationship what does it matter if there is a fetishistic component to his desire to wear it? He says she wears his clothes "because of the smell"; how is that not sexual? Oh right cuz most women are in denial about the sexual nature of 99% of their fundamentally sexual predilections. EDIT: BTW crossdressing fetishes (as in sexual fetishes) are normal for straight men because it is transgressive, but harmlessly so. It does not indicate "autogynophilia" (made-up condi…
/r/MensRights15/11/16 12:45 AM
1

Being is the leading cause of stopping being.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 12:40 AM
3

There are more than 3.5 billion women on earth. "Many women [x]" will almost always be a true statement, provided only the "x" is something humanly possible.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 12:37 AM
2

Great. So now the US female prison population is going to go up and feminists will point to that as a reason for reforming female prisons but not male. And the cycle of insanity continues.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 11:49 PM
2

Men's votes should be weighed more heavily first to account for their lower representation among registered voters and second in proportion to the difference in the amount of taxes we pay as a group, compared with women. That would be more than fair to women. :)
/r/MensRights13/11/16 07:44 PM
7

This from the "woman" who can't handle being invited for coffee by a man on an elevator. Also there was a video where she talks about why she doesn't take birth control. I believe it was a talk she gave about a Mormon dude she wanted to fuck but he didn't trust condoms alone to be effective. I do have to scratch my head and wonder who all these men are who apparently find her attractive, though.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 07:01 PM
1

\#NASTY
/r/MensRights13/11/16 06:53 PM
7

Women want men to last longer. Fuck that noise. I'm not remotely into women. I'm tired of hearing that we should cut baby dicks to please women.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 06:46 PM
7

What you have to keep in mind is that the failure to prove an accusation is not legally the same as proof the accusation is false. The burden of proof necessary to find someone guilty of maliciously making a false accusation would rightly be just as high as the burden of proof necessary to prove the accusation.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 06:42 PM
11

It could be fixed with minor rewording: "Should Angelina Jolie be sent to prison if she made false allegations of child abuse against Brad Pitt" (rather than "if her allegations are false").
/r/MensRights13/11/16 05:02 PM
2

Innit grand?
/r/MensRights13/11/16 04:55 PM
1

Who cares? Let them try. I'll laugh at their efforts to give them a taste of being a man.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 04:45 PM
1

Okay. I was trying to determine if you actually believed it's a fascist newspaper.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 02:30 PM
1

...for Sweden. And?
/r/MensRights12/11/16 11:36 PM
1

Is what?
/r/MensRights12/11/16 11:05 PM
6

And the upshot of this? Before feminist rape laws: Woman: "I was raped." Everyone: "How awful! Lock the sicko up!" After feminist rape laws: Woman: "I was raped." Everyone: "...Okay? So, like, you regretted it or...? How was he?" If you abuse language, language abuses you back.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 10:45 PM
2

The question for me is, who would have been more likely to do something? Of course even as I say it I recognize it's a meaningless hypothetical...
/r/MensRights12/11/16 03:53 PM
1

...and that it's not.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 03:43 PM
2

Let them try to take our vote away. Oh, God, please let the feminists try! I'm serious. I want to see the ultimate showdown between rational men and the women who support them on the one hand, and feminism, cultural marxism and the entire fucking Frankfurt School on the other. It's long overdue. Let's annihilate these cunts and cucks in their final form.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 03:42 PM
7

This honestly doesn't deserve a serious critical analysis. But I'll just add a question: Was the exhibitionist, half-naked snogging in the laundromat—even if it didn't go beyond that—done with the consent of everyone who might have walked in and seen it? I don't see how it possibly could have been... Lol but seriously this is fucking stupid. In both examples, there was clearly consent long before the consent was verbally "affirmed". You do not need a "yes" to kiss someone standing with his face …
/r/MensRights12/11/16 02:30 PM
1

Obviously because everyone who knows her knows she's faithful, just like they know she would never pour boiling water on her baby daddy.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 11:27 PM
1

But did you know that sexual assault is BAD? DID YOU!!
/r/MensRights11/11/16 11:09 PM
2

Okay, considering a lot of closeted homosexual dudes feel really conflicted about having gay sex even when they were eager for it at the time, this is effectively extremely anti-gay. Like, Pat Robertson levels of anti-gay. If regret = rape, then every gay man who's helped a "str8" dude "explore his sexuality" (i.e. most gay men) should be in prison. This is actually one reason I'm a gay antifeminist. I saw this logical conclusion of feminist "ethics" coming years ago.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 10:10 PM
3

Everyone's sexually attracted to "underage" people. They are sexually mature. It's biology. I'm mostly attracted to older men but I'm still (rarely) attracted to certain younger guys who are sometimes under 18. Remember Taylor Lautner when he became big? Yeah.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 06:30 PM
1

Butbutbut...cultural appropriation?
/r/MensRights11/11/16 05:17 PM
2

Making child porn with your own children isn't normal...but on marijuanas it is.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 05:11 PM
1

Lol now it's just funny to see shit like this. Almost pathos-inducing. Like, "Aww, they don't know nobody's buying their shit anymore."
/r/MensRights11/11/16 05:02 PM
2

What we should be talking about is that feminists want to literally criminalize behavior towards women which is milder than what people experience and are expected to experience, as children. They're basically saying women somehow lose resilience the older they get, so that while, say, I was obviously not traumatized when a girl in first grade kissed me on the lips without my permission (only annoyed when I was the one reprimanded for it), a woman can experience spooky trauma at a distance if a …
/r/MensRights11/11/16 02:54 PM
1

I'm absolutely baffled by how many of my fellow homos can seem to believe so fervently insist—almost as though they genuinely believed—that this election will substantively affect them. I mean I thought that this "literally everything is about me and my sexuality" thing was a phase you're supposed to get out of your system within the first couple years of coming out. My boyfriend is also fed up with them. He's always saying how much it pisses him off when he sees these hysterical posts from his …
/r/MensRights11/11/16 02:42 PM
1

Based on traditionally masculine virtues, no less.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 02:26 PM
1

Hell yeah he is.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 02:24 PM
1

...unintentionally creating a utopia.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 02:04 PM
1

Others were openly fearful of what the election would portend, depicting a mob of "uneducated whites" carrying out Trump's "anti-woman, anti-Semitic" agenda. Umm, do they understand how a representative democracy works? Perhaps they have simply forgotten that any mechanism for societal change exists beyond mob "justice". I call this all one yuge case of projection.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 02:00 PM
3

Is she blaming the cop for Trump's victory because he's "fucking a white male"?
/r/MensRights11/11/16 01:52 PM
2

Holy shit. Lefties are going to start assaulting, falsely imprisoning, torturing and murdering presumed Trump voters. They are pushing a dangerously hysterical and irresponsible narrative of "white men = Nazis". They are everything they claim to hate and don't even realize it.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 01:45 AM
2

This is what you get when universities teach Critical Theory instead of critical thinking. "Okay that may be objectively accurate information but my feelings of oppression are more valid!"
/r/MensRights11/11/16 01:28 AM
3

I know but a lot of people are not just charged but convicted when they did nothing wrong, just cuz they got on the wrong side of a crazy feminist woman.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 01:01 AM
1

Full on Honey Badger, eh? Well, y'know, leaving work won't necessarily keep her from coming after you with an accusation.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 11:47 PM
1

Bu-bu-bu-but the pussy pass don't real, u guiz!
/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:53 PM
3

You're lucky she didn't accuse you of sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 01:56 PM
2

Our sheer rage! White male rage, I tell you! And resentment.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 01:49 PM
2

Well, there was that time he got pilloried for saying that men are the ones who have it rough these days. I'm sure if the MRM got serious enough during his presidency he'd at least jump on board.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:45 AM
3

They hate us cis gay men almost as much. Sometimes more. It's an absolutely evil, cancerous ideology.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:36 AM
3

Yeah. I just had to unfriend one of my best friends from childhood on Facebook. Mind you, I never unfriend people for differing political views or even if they express a prejudiced view about a group I identify with. But this guy and his sister were saying that if you supported Trump, you should explain to your black/female/Latino/GLBT+ friends why they "don't matter to you". To make a long story short it came to me saying that it's ridiculous to imply that my Mexican boyfriend whom I love like …
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:33 AM
2

No but in this case, wasn't the sperm donor a gay man? Maybe I'm misremembering. I just seem to recall thinking, "Damn, that sort of defeats all the advantages of being gay. Still got bitches coming after him for child support!"
/r/MensRights07/11/16 03:31 AM
3

I remember this. Even my liberal gay friends were talking about how ridiculous it was when it happened.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 03:09 AM
2

I'm apparently super old school on this issue: there is no degree of intoxication, provided you knowingly and willingly got yourself into that state of intoxication, that can absolve you of responsibility for any choices you make in that state. Even if you're blackout drunk, if you are conscious, you can consent, and your consent counts. I really can't see how it would make a difference even if the other person is relatively sober. I have explained countless times that I know for a fact that tur…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 01:56 AM
5

Agreed. But maybe I should clarify I knew there is a hypothesized mechanism/relation but just find it so, so incredibly weak and uncompelling. I mean shit gets plenty wet down there one way or the other once you get down to business.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 01:30 AM
1

Oh my god you're the guy from the thing? Lol I didn't notice at first. But you're welcome.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 01:25 AM
1

Oh my god this guy is great. Truly masterful comedic editing.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 01:13 AM
2

Dear Kek that is convoluted. So does "the patriarchy" put laxer regulations on women's medications, because it cares less about their health? Clearly not. (Breast cancer gets twice the funding of the more common and more deadly prostate cancer. No society in history has cared less about women's wellbeing than men's.) Was it patriarchy that pushed so rabidly for a female contraceptive pill that the extremely unethical nature of the trials and approval process for said pill were overlooked? No, it…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 01:09 AM
2

Simpler test: who intuitively has more sex appeal: Bryan Cranston from Malcolm in the Middle or Bryan Cranston from Breaking Bad?
/r/MensRights07/11/16 12:57 AM
4

Yeah, actually, I'd like to see that.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 11:29 PM
8

I'm sorry but how gullible do you have to be to believe circumcision can actually lower HIV transmission risk? There is no possible mechanism by which it could do this; it doesn't even pass a sniff test. The studies finding "evidence" for it are complete horse shit when you look into their methodology. They only find what they find because men can't fuck while they're healing from circumcision, so they have no chance of acquiring STDs during that period.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 10:50 PM
2

Very well put.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 06:38 PM
1

Lol this just happened to a friend of mine. She was driving through an intersection when a woman ran a red light and I guess T-boned her. She said she would've been at least hospitalized with broken bones, or quite likely dead, had she been driving the car she normally drives. (And she got pretty bad whiplash from it still.) Anyway the other driver's a female attorney and starts saying it was my friend's fault and tells the cops that when they get there. There were no traffic cams or witnesses, …
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/16 08:36 PM
7

"The basic form of organisms is single-celled. Multicellularism is a birth defect."
/r/MensRights29/10/16 07:49 PM
2

Ontogenesis recapitulates phylogenesis. So are they saying animals with gills are superior to humans because embryos start off with the vestigial gills of our distant evolutionary ancestors?
/r/MensRights29/10/16 07:46 PM
9

And she answers with a non sequitur. "Because the basic human form is female"? First off what does that even mean? I'm pretty sure there was never a time when females existed without males; they've both been around for as long as we have reproduced sexually—millions of years before the very first "human forms". But even granting her moronic claim, it doesn't follow that being male—the human form with bells and whistles added—would entail emotional, spiritual or other defects. Perhaps we are impr…
/r/MensRights29/10/16 03:12 PM
2

This is an amazing video because she is genuinely sympathetic, or at least empathetic, towards the intellectuals she's charging with authoritarianism. I genuinely felt bad for them when she started talking about how they feel unimportant and often isolated from society outside their own specialized spheres. They are truly pitiable, and for once I can sincerely say that about a group I consider my enemies, without meaning insult by it. I mean, usually saying "I feel sorry for you" does not in fac…
/r/MensRights29/10/16 02:57 PM
4

Ironically, homosexual men are immune to this nowadays. Just another reason it's good to be gay. Lol
/r/MensRights29/10/16 02:35 PM
12

I stopped at "wily female activists". I just can't read feminist writing. It's invariably the most childish shit conceivable.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 02:09 PM
1

She (the "die-hard feminist) not only validated the MRM but TRP, too, with her bitchy comments on the men at the screening. "Eww! A 'slovenly' 'beta'!" Yeah, sure women like you deserve a monopoly on the narrative of gender discrimination—or on anything else.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 01:48 AM
3

Why would we do that with the documentary coming out so soon.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 09:48 PM
2

The best part is that they just reinforce the idea that all women can do is nag. 😆
/r/MensRights15/10/16 08:22 PM
4

One of my favorite essays on feminism. Perfectly reflected my views when I read it (which was shortly after I'd completed an LGBT studies course at uni...which was coded as women's studies. HashtagFemaleSolipsism) Have you read the "Why Gay Men Don't Need Feminism" series on AVfM?
/r/MensRights15/10/16 06:18 PM
5

"I won't do your show again if you don't let me respond to this." Was that a promise or a threat?
/r/MensRights15/10/16 04:51 PM
0

Lloyd is gay, right? We need more gay MRA types. (Though there are probably more than you think, as it is.) We have even higher verbal intelligence than straight women.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 04:41 PM
2

It's Current Year. Come on guys.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 03:46 PM
5

Men's spaces like coffeehouses and pubs were epicenters of the Enlightenment. You think well-bred, upper-class men would've been raucously debating laws of physics and principles of government among women in those days? No, they would've been on their "best" behavior and not let the debate get too heated. (Women are arguably horrible judges of morality and character since they tend to prefer etiquette to ethics, propriety to principles, and agreeableness to argumentation.) Listening to women cou…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 03:30 PM
2

Privilege means getting to be brainwashed into self-loathing, apparently.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:35 PM
4

Seriously. I lol'd when she called patriarchy a "delusion". It's the source of not just all modern technology, but all modern concepts of individual rights which feminazis are now abusing through their reductiones ad absurdum.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:32 PM
1

That is rich as fuck coming out of a movement which misapplies (extremely) modern ideas of individual rights in order to say that women have had it worse than men historically. Without the idea that freedom is more important than life itself, the opposite conclusion is too obvious for anyone to avoid.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 10:10 PM
1

Equality is a false god. It's just the perfect ad hoc argument for achieving supremacy, since there are multiple "equalities" which are mutually exclusive. I.e. no matter how many "victories" they nag men into handing thm, feminazis can point to areas where women are "unequal" and, so long as inferior treatment of men in these and other areas is never adequately addressed, they can do this indefinitely, even long past the point where women have more formal power than men. I.e. now.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 05:24 PM
0

And you're wrong that he doesn't bother with bs. This whole thing started cuz he got involved in Elevatorgate, which was the biggest BS Internet drama in history, arguably.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 05:22 PM
4

until around the 2000s 😂😂😂
/r/MensRights03/10/16 05:20 PM
4

Why does the idiot try? Is he incapable of learning? Even trying to please these people is like diving into a shark tank and cutting yourself.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:40 PM
5

Muh wimmin in muh fridger rater!
/r/MensRights02/10/16 05:10 PM
2

hand pecked
/r/MensRights28/09/16 11:18 PM
2

I'd never actually read him. Now I'll have to.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 12:42 PM
2

Jack Donovan read my mind on this one, and I think he might just be the epitome of sexy, to boot. Nffff.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:59 AM
1

Thanks for the reply. I agree, it annoys me when MtFs demand everyone consider them "literally" women or FtMs demand they be considered "literally" men. And I have zero respect for machismo culture. Those attitudes made my boyfriend's childhood hell. Just fucking backwards. Basically it's all the worst of what feminists depict masculinity as to demonize it. Being an abusive degenerate isn't what being a man is about. Doesn't make for much better women either. They're the type who can only fall f…
/r/MensRights27/09/16 11:01 PM
3

.uk Shocked, shocked. We must never become Europe. Or Mexico. Or Australia. Fuck. Time to just close the borders.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 01:28 AM
3

I honestly don't know what to think on this topic. On the one hand, the research does basically show, iirc, that women's visual sexual arousal response (such as it is) is almost indiscriminate compared to that of men. On the other hand, they clearly discriminate more in "mate selection", including on the basis of visual aesthetics. On the one hand, again, I also infer from studies as well as conversations with women that their tastes change wildly depending on where they are in their ovulation c…
/r/MensRights27/09/16 01:23 AM
1

I really can't speak to any of that, obviously. But that's the thing: if "cis" men cannot relate to any of the ways in which you experience "being male", then in what sense precisely are you just like us? I already have all the T I need to look male because my brain is, literally, a male brain (it doesn't just have certain regions of unclear cognitive significance which happen to be closer in size to the male average than the female average); and a male brain produces sex hormones in male quanti…
/r/MensRights27/09/16 12:48 AM
1

But the author of that article was exposed to the idea, at quite an early age, and it happened to be shortly (about a year) after he had started trying on his sisters clothes. So that's not really proving anything to me. Almost all kids are curious about things that are supposed to be the other gender's things. I know I was. If I wanted to construct a narrative about how I had always longed to be a girl—or at least not a boy—I would have as much material as any transwoman I've heard if I just pu…
/r/MensRights26/09/16 11:40 PM
9

Not all of them do but it is EXTREMELY common to hear them rationalize it by claiming they're just giving us a taste of our own medicine.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 01:56 AM
89

I'm honestly pro-objectification all around. Feminists try to use the objectification of men to "prove to us" that objectification hurts, but really they just prove the opposite. Because it doesn't hurt. When men complain about this hypocritical bullshit, they are complaining about just that. Men can't stand inconsistencies like that. We're just too damn logical.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 10:00 PM
4

Nothing about what I said falls apart. If transgenderism isn't environmental, then do trans people exist in all cultures? Maybe the potential trans people living where "gender confirmation" procedures aren't practiced just need to be educated on the fact that they have been improperly dealing with having a gender-atypical brain, and that they are incomplete without surgery. Would that make their lives better?
/r/MensRights25/09/16 09:53 PM
2

It makes me feel almost like crying, thinking how this ideology is being allowed to run amok of confused kids' vulnerability and naivete. Because I have an MtF friend and honestly I feel like just interacting with her is like stepping on eggshells. These people are so emotionally fragile and have so much unquenchable yearning and unanswerable questions even after they transition... I know that they say that we learn the difference between males and females early on, but I believe it's normal (th…
/r/MensRights25/09/16 08:35 PM
10

Have you heard of Zinnia Jones? She (I guess I'll just say she to refer to ZJ post-coming out as trans) has a semi-prominent YouTube channel called ZJemptv and I believe is still an r/lgbt mod. Anyway I used to watch "his" (real name Zachary Antolak) videos sometimes and I remember one day he uploaded a video with a title like "sometimes I am ashamed to be a man" in which he was chiding someone for saying something sexist and oh my god how dare someone say anything unflattering about women becau…
/r/MensRights25/09/16 08:15 PM
9

Just because it's not a choice doesn't mean it isn't largely determined by environment. I'm not even trans and I understand male gender dysphoria first-hand. It took me a long time to feel good about being male. From school to church to the media to politics, the message was clear: men are the root of all problems, and women are the gold standard of human decency. So I'm sorry, but I don't think the trans movement is indicative of a healthy society. Yes, I know trans people personally and honest…
/r/MensRights25/09/16 07:57 PM
4

That is how I am interpreting it, though.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 07:17 PM
23

This is actually pretty consistent. The fact is that what women are most attracted to and desire the most, is often also something they fear. Remember that in humans, as in most species, females are the agents of sexual selection. Everything men are was chosen by our female ancestors. But back in the day, they wanted strong, capable, bold men who weren't afraid of risky confrontation, because they wanted to be protected. Their desire for mates like this, however, does not enable women to interac…
/r/MensRights24/09/16 04:57 PM
2

I doubt that that punch KO'd her...
/r/MensRights24/09/16 04:42 PM
1

Which statistics show that blacks are more likely than whites to be killed when the police confront them? Show me these statistics if they exist. The point that is always raised about the overrepresentation of blacks among violent criminals in general, is not that that "justifies" otherwise excessive police brutality; it is that that explains why black civilians are more frequently confronted by police. "Police are real.... The Patriarchy is not real..." We are not comparing the police to the pa…
/r/MensRights22/09/16 05:07 AM
2

Landmark decision that established that statutory rape laws restricting perpetrators to the male sex, do not violate the equal protection clause. Basically, it says girl rape is worse than boy rape.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 03:49 AM
1

It is paradoxical, isn't it? But relational aggression may be women's primary means of competing with one another—and without incurring a significant risk of death (as male forms of competition often do). And yet, sticking together "when it counts" is also a big survival tool for women. Plus, protection of women is a survival tool for the species. It is practically a biological imperative, and one which both sexes feel. But women feel it far more intensely.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 03:44 AM
2

Feminists have written extensively on the puzzle that is feminism's apparent historical inability to accurately predict women's collective behavior or to successfully change its pattern.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 03:35 AM
1

How are you saying it's not the same, then? Are you saying the social aggression of women towards other women does justify male massage-a-knee?
/r/MensRights22/09/16 03:32 AM
1

They say Hillary's health problems can't be brought up to discredit her fitness as a presidential candidate because all the way back during the Vietnam war Trump got a deferral from being human cannon fodder due to his foot, and yet the very thing that saved Hillary from serving in that same war is precisely what qualifies her to be Commander in Chief of the wold's second largest military. But that's "none of my business", as they say. EDIT: Not to mention it's just, a priori, a sexist microaggr…
/r/PussyPass20/09/16 02:45 AM
1

I really don't understand people who try to argue that it's not. Seems to me they just can't get over their own visceral objection to what they consider an offensive term long enough to realize that it describes an inarguably real phenomenon.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 02:34 AM
2

Silenced
/r/MensRights18/09/16 07:55 AM
6

Literally blind. Women can even abuse men in public and it isn't recognized for what it is. I'm too lucky. Being a homo and all.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 11:19 PM
1

True. Especially in just the past couple years. If I were a feminist I wouldn't be so confident as they seem still to be. Anyway, they could always restrict comments to their own subscribers, or whatever. But they probably think they're "showcasing intolerance".
/r/MensRights07/09/16 05:38 PM
5

Just did. It's in fine shape, thank god.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 11:49 PM
22

I think I need my gender fluid checked
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:11 PM
11

You need to figure out how to tell if someone is joking. Not trying to be a dick here. And I know there are probably feminists out there who hold these beliefs seriously. But if you're in doubt as to whether you are dealing with one of those, you could always try looking at someone's comments history.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:09 PM
3

"You're fucking a white male!"
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:05 PM
1

I just checked it and it says here part of my privilege is not having to give a fuck about marginalized groups' lived experiences. In this case I'll avail myself of that part of my privilege.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:03 PM
1

Manginas are the only reason feminism has been given the power it has. Women alone do not have the power to do that; their power to change society inheres purely in men's willingness to support them, whereas the reverse is not true.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 06:55 PM
2

Women are natural born actresses. Nothing they say or pretend they feel has meaning. "Sed mulier cupido quod dicit amanti / in vento et rapida scribere oportet aqua" Catullus Also this.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 02:19 PM
1

Nothing. It's just overrun with antifeminists and disgruntled alt-rightists.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 12:19 PM
1

Lol they use Disqus as their comments platform.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 11:16 PM
3

I like how they just ignore the "or gets me off the hook for child support."
/r/MensRights31/08/16 10:35 PM
2

Nothing can turn someone off of supporting women's grievances, better than listening to women try to support their own. I used to at least occasionally mention that the double standard around toplessness was bullshit, mostly because I'm gay and do actually find shirtless men as big a "distraction" (if that's how we wanna argue it) as straight men find topless women to be. But feminists are sooo obnoxious on this issue, and women in general are usually so adamant in their insistence that anything…
/r/MensRights24/08/16 01:56 PM
1

All wimmin are bi.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 01:39 PM
0

verbally abused me Oh my god kill yourself.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 07:16 PM
12

As a gay man this infuriates me to no end. I mean can we not all fucking just grow up or show some balls? What is going on in London? Gay police? Wtf? Why even? Could you get any more Orwellian? I mean...it's a total backwards step. A total fucking embarrassment to everyone who's ever fought for GLBT (not putting ladies first, sorry) rights. Or who is currently putting their lives on the line for basic, legitimate human rights in any of the dozens of countries that still criminalize homosexualit…
/r/MensRights23/08/16 07:11 PM
4

Well it makes sense since boys mature so much fa– Wait a second...
/r/MensRights23/08/16 06:56 PM
5

All terrorism combatted by "toxic masculinity". Beware of making your saviors and protectors too much like women.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:13 PM
2

"Remembah da shoah!"
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:10 PM
3

Just goes to demonstrate, yet again, that women generally have no realistic understanding of what constitutes "danger".
/r/MensRights22/08/16 03:36 PM
3

How do you figure that soliciting minors for sex online makes you a bigger "threat to the public" than molesting kids for years starting when they're 6?
/r/MensRights22/08/16 03:33 PM
0

This is pretty old. Why is it here? I mean there is definitely a connection between gay rights and men's rights as gay men have faced especially severe (legal and social) discrimination and still do in many countries, but it would be more helpful, if you want to relate gay rights to men's rights, to point out the arguments of the many traditionalists who claim "men need women to civilize them", rather than talking about the religious side of opposition to gay rights.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 01:11 PM
3

I gave her a chance for all of Train Wreck and literally every other character in that was funnier than her. I think the only one I laughed at was Cena.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:30 AM
3

A self-proclaimed "humor" site adopting the feminist agenda makes less sense than the American Lung Society promoting Marlboro.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 10:49 PM
4

What leg up? Stupid bitch.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 06:34 PM
1

Toppest of keks.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 06:33 PM
2

Yeah what I said is probably literally not an accurate explanation, but things sure make a helluva lot more sense if you look at it that way. In any case, the upshot is this: we need a revolution by savages who just do not give a fuck. Most likely a disproportionately homosexual legion of confrontational male intellectuals and even fighters. I have no doubt that a feminist society is not a stable model; the only question is whether this revolution will happen before we are conquered by anti-civi…
/r/MensRights17/08/16 03:33 AM
9

Surely. /s
/r/MensRights16/08/16 11:07 PM
2

Women cannot ask to be equal members of men's institutions, spaces, disciplines, etc., and demand special protections above and beyond those which men receive, or even which they ask for or desire. Men are still naturally superior in all areas where the sexes are integrated because men face greater threats for stepping out of line, and have to rely on their own merits rather than others' desire to protect, defend and generally assist them.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 08:13 PM
1

Lol is she recycling old material?
/r/MensRights16/08/16 08:11 PM
7

I non-satirically agree. Women actually get praise for showing they can be "just as violent as men". It's a sign of their "equality"—nay, superiority—in this fucked up world. If they were instead treated just as violently as men are when they aggress, it would (have) solve(d) a shit ton of problems. As a matter of fact, all of women's formal power comes from men who have a desire to be dominated sexually, and sublimated their fetish towards the social and political empowerment of women, which th…
/r/MensRights16/08/16 08:09 PM
3

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Zr162OZ2Z0w
/r/MensRights14/08/16 07:08 PM
2

It's to be expected. It isn't easy for most men to come to the blindingly obvious realization that the problems with feminism inhere in the psychological biases of the sex to which the movement caters. E.g. the problems for males in education are always going to result from coeducation or having too many female instructors. The injustices described in the video are always going to be the result of the ways women as a whole use their political influence. Over criminalization of men has always bee…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 05:07 PM
0

His detractors have literally no counterargument to anything he says. Just shaming language. Just feelings. Just crybully tactics. Such is the way of women who are not kept in their place by society.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 04:17 PM
0

So...you agree that almost all women think as that female "soldier" does or would find the double standard reasonable?
/r/MensRights11/08/16 12:28 PM
1

99.9% of women have exactly the same attitude towards male/female interaction as the female "soldier" in Tgunner's story. But you're welcome to live in denial and end up in prison because you trusted a woman to behave rationally or understand ethics.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 01:17 AM
3

My point is, we have two options as a society: at least pretend that women are as capable as men of making a rational decision, even when drunk, to consent to the act, even if women themselves say they are not; or radically segregate the sexes for the protection of both of them. If women want to be treated like children just because they are socially and emotionally illiterate when it comes to men and issues of raw sexuality, then they will have to sacrifice the liberties which adults enjoy. The…
/r/MensRights06/08/16 06:22 PM
4

Who the fuck cares if men and women might react differently to the same situation? You can't say "I want equality" and then "I want special accommodations to be made for women because of their emotional fragility," or "I think men and women should be held to the same standards" but then "I think men should demonstrate more restraint and prudence when dealing with women should because men don't take some things as badly and/or a man can do more damage." The latter of each pair of statements is ac…
/r/MensRights06/08/16 02:05 PM
2

The fact that the cunts weren't locked up for their own harassment campaigns and abuse of the courts is good enough reason to remove that "practically".
/r/MensRights06/08/16 04:27 AM
1

Just to be clear, the argument is not that so-called objectification is wrong, but we are just pointing out the hypocrisy of BuzzFeed (and leftist new media generally), right? I mean I never understood how admiring someone for his/her body was worse than using someone's supposedly "disgusting" body for comedy fodder, which is how men are "objectified" all the time even though it is never properly labeled as such. (Not that feminists these days have read their own literature and can give you a de…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 11:25 PM
8

Don't you get it? Men are not human. Women do not give a shit about you, your bodily autonomy, health, or life. Forget them. I don't give a fuck about what they say or think and neither should you.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 10:47 PM
2

Feminism is not now and never has been about "equality". It has been about removing powers from men and/or transferring them to women, along with rights and privileges that men had enjoyed only because their peculiar responsibilities necessitated them—responsibilities which women and feminists want men to keep, while, again, taking away rights and privileges which were put in place merely to facilitate men's fulfillment of these responsibilities. Feminism has never been about pushing for women t…
/r/MensRights01/08/16 05:57 PM
1

What a fucking evil cunt. Hope ISIS get their hands on her.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 10:26 PM
4

All feminists can do is lie and dissemble.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 10:16 PM
17

Feminism is the enemy of men and their rights. Quit your bullshit.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 10:14 PM
4

Sauvage by Dior.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 05:46 PM
9

Coeducation was a terrible, terrible mistake and is a thoroughly failed experiment.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 07:11 PM
1

Rape hoaxers get a right to anonymity but their victims don't—which is exactly why these evil fucking bitches do it.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 01:12 AM
5

Ooh, I know! Is it because...it's all about how she "fees" about what she did and about suggesting mitigating circumstances rather than about the fact that a lowly male has had his life cut short by a woman, who is after all the only being who was capable of giving his life meaning should she have so chosen?
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:46 PM
1

Well, Thomas Bayes was a white cismale.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:40 PM
36

So he's too young to smoke, drink, drive, have sex, vote, etc., but not to make a life-altering decision that just happens to be supported by his moms who subscribe to batshit crazy gender theory? Nah. This is why I really can't support the transgender movement. It is insane. In order to "transition" correctly you cannot go through puberty as the "wrong" sex. (Sex hormones do not have remotely the same effects when administered after puberty, as they would if produced by the body during puberty.…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 02:44 PM
1

Yeah I know. But a woman is going a little far having an (especially sophomoric, naive and reductive) opinion on men's psychology/culture.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 09:00 PM
2

I mean like, it's not a good look. If they wanna behave like typical penis envying pseudo-gladiators, fine. We should be able to treat them like men or even ban them as part of a ban on women in general.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 08:57 PM
2

Thank you! This is exactly how I feel. Want to discriminate against me for my sexuality? That's fine. But I also get to discriminate against you for your (probably religious) beliefs. It's not just a good idea, it's the law a guarantee of the First Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court but somehow statutorily outlawed. I don't want to be served by someone who hates my guts, anyway.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 08:56 PM
12

Happily. I'll try to be thorough but I can't guarantee I son't leave something out: They are accustomed, and feel entitled, to being served first (and get bitchy when this doesn't happen). They feel entitled to touch us, have no concept of personal space, no respect for our sexuality, etc. Low alcohol tolerance. Literally assault and batter if you say something they don't like...or because they think they're flirting. (I can only assume straight men let them get away with this and so they aren't…
/r/MensRights17/07/16 08:52 PM
1

Whatever you say, "chevalier" cuck.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 05:59 PM
6

It's based on lies. And whataboutery. Women's clothes are more expensive because they are less likely to pay for their own clothes and their profligate materialism has economic consequences. Go to any large shopping mall and look at the store directory and just eyeball the length of the list of women's clothing stores vs. men's. Supply. And. Demand. What's arguably more unfair is to say women "deserve" as much money as men when men pay more/need to pay more for substantial expenses that they can…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 08:02 PM
9

Hey did you know women control most of the wealth in the west? Yeah they spend more. Of men's money. Than men. That's what all there "unpaid emotional labor" (i.e. existing and being inexplicably desirable to most men) gets them.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 07:57 PM
7

Wow that's infuriating. Just goes to show how much more sexist women are than men, in the worst, most vicious ways. Of course the research on the Women are Wonderful effect had already established that. As well as the research showing that women are literally turned off by seeing men acting happy.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 07:54 PM
22

You clearly know nothing about this. It's because of laws against "gender discrimination". There are plenty of gay bars that would love to ban women formally. Bear bars. Leather bars. They have reputations for being "misogynistic". The Wrangler in Denver is one. It was successfully sued within the last couple years for discriminating against a drag queen; not exactly a case of trying to sue women, but they do try to maintain a certain aesthetic (they have a piss trough visible from the front ent…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 07:50 PM
2

Women commit sexual crimes too, but is there any evidence that men make false accusations of sex crimes, as women do? Guess which crime a majority of Innocence Project exonerees were found to be falsely convicted of? That's right, rape. That's something that just does not happen to women, and the vast majority of females will simply never understand the fear of even being suspected of such an offense. Maybe society really should be gender segregated.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 07:09 PM
1

"...so let's let all these migrants in indiscriminately!" Women: nature's useful idiots.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 07:02 PM
27

Even lesbians. Fighty fucking dykes are not cute.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 06:39 PM
92

As a gay man nothing would make me happier than if women could be banned from all my favorite bars.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 04:36 PM
-3

Opinion, eh? What do you call a woman's opinion? Wrong.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 04:34 PM
1

Why is this a thing? I mean women's apparent inability to tell the difference between their dreams/fantasy and reality? I've heard so many women talk about waking up in the middle of the night and hitting their husband/boyfriend because of something they'd dreamed he did. And there have been other stories specifically on this sub, specifically about women dreaming about being raped. Son of Hinnom I'm glad I'm a homo.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 04:31 PM
1

Sorry, "Kevin", but "Lisa" is most likely gonna dump your ass once she gets "her" kids.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:19 PM
3

This has never been more apropos.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:03 PM
2

Common sense used to tell men and women alike that women shouldn't vote or be given influence over the laws and policies of the state. This is why. Hell this is why it also used to be common sense that women can't handle being in public too much and were more suited to domestic life.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 12:56 PM
14

FemininitySoFragile
/r/MensRights14/07/16 12:45 PM
1

Well I know females don't. :|
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/16 10:25 PM
2

fuckboy Nope. Red flag. "Not for human consumption." comfort girls Omg did she just racially fetishize herself? 😂
/r/MensRights01/07/16 07:06 PM
1

What a couple stupid cunts.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 09:00 PM
2

Lol I've never seen a more blatant attempt by feminaziism to turn men into sexists so they can later bitch about their sexism.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 12:07 AM
1

I mean it isn't like I think it's a big deal, just explaining why he's probably right about the facts.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/16 12:48 AM
5

Lmao
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/16 12:47 AM
1

We do not know healthy sexuality in the west. We even have a disorder called "Pedophile OCD" thanks to the relentless demonization of men's sexuality, for fuck's sake. It's not normal or sane for half of a species to feel the need to obsessively second-guess their feelings towards its most vulnerable members like this.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 04:05 AM
6

I'm honestly so torn on this case it makes me sick to even try to articulate my thoughts on it. But yes, I think she sounds like a good person, and he sounds like an idiot with a lot of issues but I wouldn't make him out to be a monster of biblical proportions, as all these virtue signaling fucktards do, from what I've read. It isn't that I think his sentence is too light, either, but every man should have a right to a fair and reasonable and proportionate sentence and it's the extravagant durat…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 11:46 PM
41

Lol do they not realize their target readership is all the women most likely to wear short skirts and crop tops in sub-freezing weather?
/r/MensRights09/06/16 11:29 PM
9

This. He is actually an anti-assimilationist gay exceptionalist of the Harry Hay variety, with some Quentin Crisp mixed in, and some very down-to-earth '70s gay views on the qualitative differences between dyke and fag sexuality.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/16 12:10 AM
-1

He was for it before he was against it. I think if you're a gay Catholic you have to get over one or the other part of that identity at some point to be properly happy and well-adjusted—and it sure as hell ain't gonna be the gay part.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/16 12:07 AM
14

He isn't saying lesbians are not exclusively homosexual because they have had dick at some point. He is saying that female sexuality so fluid that all women are essentially bisexual. Which is more than plausible. Women's sexuality is a lot more open to interpretation than men's, at least on average, but quite likely universally. I mean, this is a bit of a simplification but it's not like women spend their adolescence with an obtrusive arousal detector in their pants that is annoyingly impossible…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/16 12:03 AM
2

Opposite Day seems to come later and earlier every year.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 06:22 PM
1

That's what I'm saying. Men have to justify their very existence by serving women.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:04 AM
3

Men have been "dating down" since time immemorial but never called it that. So much for that female compassion eh?
/r/MensRights08/06/16 02:55 AM
2

What happens when an allegation made by a woman meets another woman's denial of that allegation? Kinda an unstoppable force/immovable object type scenario for feminist types, eh?
/r/MensRights08/06/16 02:02 AM
0

Well, I don't think he should necessarily get a harsher punishment. I just don't think other people (okay, men) should just because they don't have as much money.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:00 AM
2

What was the deal about her waking up in a hospital? EDIT: Okay well I think the pine needles part is what's fucked up. Dude's obviously deranged. I can understand it they were both drunk, she consented and then passed out and he was still fingering her. Believe me, things just like that have happened to me; I do not feel bad about them, I enjoyed what I remembered of them, I know they were consensual even in the case where I can't remember how it started, and I accept responsibility for them an…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:21 AM
5

How pissed off are Indian feminists?
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:17 AM
4

The weak are not "brave" for hitting the strong if they know they won't be hit back because there are severe repercussions for in-kind retaliation against violent women if you are a man. Best case scenario they are cowards hiding behind a shield much stronger than muscle, or more likely hoping for proxy violence.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 07:59 PM
4

Did she/you assume that was specifically an Army saying? ;p
/r/MensRights05/06/16 03:06 PM
5

Fuck this guy. The penal system really is wrongheaded, breeds nothing but trauma and more crime—but of all the people to decide to spare, this fucking creep?
/r/MensRights05/06/16 02:54 PM
1

Feminism was never not cancer. Even in the days of the Suffragettes (spoiled cunts).
/r/MensRights05/06/16 02:32 PM
2

"The child's needs come first!" (you know, before those of the other "child", in the legal sense) but "Her body, her choice!" Women > "children" > boys, in terms of legal protections.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 01:33 AM
0

That's a good point but also to be fair, the title says "jail", not "prison". Big difference.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 01:22 AM
4

L'elemefayo. DailyMail is officially a troll site. No way in buttfuckland I'm reading all that. How the fuck do they manage to write so many words on such a retarded thesis?
/r/MensRights01/06/16 02:24 AM
2

I understand completely. I'm so sorry.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 05:23 PM
15

I'm a special super-enlightened progressive snowflake who doesn't experience physical attraction unless I have someone's express written consent to find them attractive.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 01:38 AM
5

How can something to which both sexes are subjected be "sexism"? I don't know why Kit is making a big deal of this, if he's countering the feminists' insinuation that women are specially degraded or if he is validating the notion that this is degrading in the first place. I'm not sure I care. Bottom line is if he has a problem with being sexually objectified he should stop preening so much. The only possible way his complaints can be of value is if they show how completely trivial this whole "is…
/r/MensRights30/05/16 01:36 AM
2

"More sensitive to disadvantage" is sure a weird way to say "experience greater disadvantages when put in the same environments." More abuse, worse discrimination, higher likelihood of being forced into gangs...
/r/MensRights29/05/16 08:42 PM
2

Okay, fair enough, guess I can't judge without context.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 08:33 PM
1

I don't think anything is wrong with being a slut (and if I did, I would be filled with self-loathing), but this was cringeworthy as all fuck. Going around with a chip on your shoulder and willfully putting strangers in situations that you believe they are uncomfortable with is a huge red flag for narcissism or worse. Also, sorry, but using "I don't slut shame" as a pickup line is cringeworthy too, no matter how successful it is. I mean, fine, if you're trying to attract that type of girl, it's …
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:36 PM
6

If men could reproduce without women, society would be just fine with only men in it. If there were only women, however, there would be millions of jobs that would go undone.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:24 PM
2

Chris Hemsworth's sexual obsession with me also exists. Awesome!
/r/MensRights28/05/16 10:21 PM
1

I did eventually read it and yes, it was worth it. Especially reading it in aloud in a Chinese accent that SJWs would find offensive. (I was channeling a philosophy professor of mine from my last semester at uni, a Chinese woman.)
/r/MensRights28/05/16 09:27 PM
1

Fuck the original article and this one. You can't support claim to be an effective opponent of a moral panic against men, like "rape culture" narratives, while supporting a major part of that exact same moral panic: In a culture the left claims is filled with rapists, the left led by the Obama Administration, wants to let the rapists have free reign in bathrooms across America. Fuck these stupid cucks. Tbh I'm not super concerned one way or the other with the trans/bathroom issue and think it's …
/r/MensRights28/05/16 07:21 PM
1

B-b-but non-whites can do no wrong because they don't have enough power.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 07:02 PM
1

It is fun to read her whole shutdown post aloud in a sassy Chinese accent that SJWs would consider super racist.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 07:01 PM
1

Okay just finished gathering context and reading it. Best reddit drama ever. That woman is a cunt slayer! I love how the AMR moron kept trying to call her ignorant of her own culture because she (SexyCyborg) didn't agree with the sanctimonious, empirialist, victimologist analysis of that culture that non-STEM activists for women in STEM keep pushing. These SJW types are all the same, like that idiot who accused that Auschwitz survivor of "white privilege" because he didn't agree that Trump was l…
/r/MensRights28/05/16 06:56 PM
1

As someone who totally read the entire thing I find this a very good summary. <.< EDIT: In all seriousness I'm reading it now.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 06:36 PM
1

Y'know, for the benefit of other, less patient people than myself. >_>
/r/MensRights28/05/16 06:22 PM
2

Uhh, not to be a dick but...tl;dr?
/r/MensRights28/05/16 06:22 PM
1

Yeah, I wrote a paper on Bayes's theorem. I was always a big fan. (Think it's cool how the Coast Guard uses it, for example.) Actually that was just part of the paper, but I was looking at its applicability to Hume's arguments concerning miracles—which is what it was developed to counter (unsuccessfully, imo). The problem is Bayesian probabilities still depend on underlying assumptions which are not themselves absolute certainties and therefore they always contain an element of circularity and s…
/r/MensRights28/05/16 04:54 PM
6

These bitches got lynching culture.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 04:15 PM
1

Except that probability of guilt really can't be quantified to that kind of degree of certainty so this is absurd, imaginary hair splitting. It is impossible in practice to take into account all theoretically possible explanations for a known event (murder, rape or an accusation thereof), and weigh the likelihood of one particular explanation ([person X] did it) as a percentage of all possibilities, which is what it would take to actually get a meaningful "percentage". That's why the standard is…
/r/MensRights28/05/16 03:38 PM
5

But slut shaming is still because muh paytreearky. facepalm
/r/MensRights28/05/16 03:28 PM
5

Women: "I wish you expressed your emotions more." Man: Expresses his emotions. Women: "Eek! Not like that!" Women all think they're empaths but don't know shit about men's emotions. It's like a puddle trying to understand what it feels like to be the sea. It isn't (physically) easy for us to just bawl over a carton of B&J's and have that make us feel better like women can. So when women exort us to be more emotional, they're looking for particular kinds of emotionality, the kinds thst come easy …
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:43 PM
2

Well, I don't know that men are "less emotional" or "more calculating"; men and women have different kinds of emotional reactions, and are calculating in different ways. Men do have more testosterone, though, which regulates emotions and moderates negative emotions in particular, and makes us more rational in a lot of ways (solution oriented, less likely to complain for its own sake).
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:34 PM
2

This is why you're the best. ;)
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:26 PM
2

...no, I'm too womanly?
/r/MensRights27/05/16 09:15 PM
1

It's not. "Almost always" is not remotely close to the truth.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 05:41 PM
5

I live in a stable, rich, first world democracy and, even within this privileged setting, I have a lot of advantages. I was born into a nice, well-off family. I’m a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant. I have no disabilities, mental issues or even major allergies. But most importantly, in my day-to-day life, I am a man. (Emphasis mine.) And here, right off the bat, we see the delusion being put forth that maleness—alone—accounts for more "privilege" than living in a "stable, rich, first world democracy…
/r/MensRights23/05/16 05:06 PM
2

Nothing I've read on that site has ever sounded remotely credible. It all reads like feminist victimology fantasy porn, and that's what it would be even if true. I will never trust the word of women like that.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 01:18 AM
7

Feminists attacking the MRM: "The MRM doesn't do anything to help men! They aren't activists, they don't raise consciousness—they just attack feminists." Feminists feeling under attack: "Help! The MRM is doing too much consciousness raising! They are 'hijacking' what is rightfully our cause! Heresy must not be tolerated!" Incidentally, does the definition of NPD in this comic, which I just happened to see in the "What's Hot Right Now" bar, sound suspiciously like an explanation for why feminists…
/r/MensRights22/05/16 09:26 PM
1

I'm sorry, yes, of course this double standard does exist, but the reader definitely could have chosen a better examples to compare. Don't you think?
/r/MensRights22/05/16 06:01 PM
10

"defining itself" as an ally
/r/MensRights22/05/16 05:09 PM
2

Yes well, obviously this is why gender segregation of precisely the sort which exists in Saudi Arabia is the optimal, and inevitable, way to structure society in order for the greatest number of women to benefit the most. If men (and other women) have to force women not to put themselves in the vulnerable and unavoidably hazardous position of being around strange men, well, that's for their own good. Obviously. Any women who think otherwise are obviously spermified zombies whose judgment cannot …
/r/MensRights22/05/16 04:48 AM
4

Does she realize she's trying to fight a misandric moral panic with a moral panic which actually lends credence to people's paranoid fears about "men in dresses"?
/r/MensRights18/05/16 12:16 AM
1

I hope their women like ISIS dick.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:36 PM
3

Yeah I don't know about that hypothesis either. I don't really find it particularly credible since we know that not all women have especially painful births, and men have historically had to have high pain tolerance to even be willing to endure the sorts of ordeals that earn them a chance to reproduce. And anyway, that tolerance would only come about evolutionarily if birthing pain alone could kill women and/or their babies. Otherwise it doesn't seem plausible that nature would go to the trouble…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 04:39 PM
2

The risks entailed by pregnancy are precisely why they are much more choosy in their sexual behavior. Sexual selection is driven by female choice in pretty much all sexually reproducing species. Furthermore the size of the female population is the limiting variable of a species'/group's reproductive capacity, which accounts for the imperative to protect females from risk. Women themselves feel this imperative and are more risk averse. They also make stronger valuative judgments, while men are mo…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 02:59 PM
23

But that would make men a significant majority of DV "victims".
/r/MensRights16/05/16 02:41 PM
23

Maybe they finally got to him with their Feminist Reprogramming Machine. Poor dude.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 02:40 PM
2

Teach girls not to lie about sexually motivated crimes.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:18 PM
4

Tbh her attitude towards other women is completely typical among women. "Misogynist: a man who hates women as much as women hate each other." H. L. Mencken In any case it does not keep women from evaluating each other charitably overall. Paradoxically, the women are wonderful effect is still much stronger among women even though they generally think of each other as catty bitches. Bitches gotta stick together. So yeah, there is no indication here that this female nursing supervisor is inclined t…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:11 PM
3

I dunno... That strikes me as either an extremely naïve or a somewhat racist comparison. To think differences among different "races" are comparable in significance to differences between the sexes is an untenable position. I mean one is the necessary primary categorical division of members of a sexually reproducing species, which has been around for millions of years, and the other is basically where your ancestors lived over a certain period of human history.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 03:40 PM
20

The students claimed that female-only clubs were more important than male-only clubs because women experience systematic oppression, and they repeated claims that such clubs were necessary because women “earn less” than male counterparts and because women are “targeted and shamed” for their sexuality. Complete lack of self-awareness. The irony is almost beautiful.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 01:41 PM
9

I don't understand how you can be "tempted" by modern women but the annoying part, yes, absolutely. Good idea m8.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 11:44 PM
4

Impossible. Men are pure sex. I don't understand how anyone cannot be attracted to them. They're fucking amazing.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 11:39 PM
1

They would love nothing more than to see entire armies of men fight and kill each other brutally for their favors. Men have no need for women to demonstrate their desire for them through ordeals or to vie for their affections, in order to feel validated. They would get nothing out of that. Better just to have them all than to have the last one standing! Men don't think first and foremost about their own welfare. Men don't need women for protection so they don't need women to demonstrate their pr…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 10:36 PM
6

How does anyone as awesome as her exist? She has been through hell and yet is the antithesis of any kind of radicalism. She identifies as a feminist and yet is as aware as anyone of the problems plaguing feminism today, she sees the good in men and does not think women have a monopoly on suffering of any kind.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 05:45 PM
12

Remember that article that that pregnant woman wrote for them about how she was afraid her unborn son would be a rapist?
/r/MensRights10/05/16 01:48 PM
7

As if women knew what they wanted.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 01:45 PM
3

It certainly reminds me of the rooster who thinks his crowing makes the sun rise.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 12:45 AM
3

It's true, feminism has always focused primarily on hating and blaming men. That has been the basic premise of feminist rhetoric, theory and praxis since forever. Yes, even the Suffragettes—and before them. You cannot have a feminist movement without resentment towards men. Women's rights, sure, but not feminism, not this quasi-Marxist pseudo-class-warfare-based monopolizing ideology of human "rights" cast in a framework of feminine supremacy and affirming the delusion that women have been denie…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 08:35 PM
1

Oh! thanks.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 09:59 PM
4

It's the type of thing that would get dismissively labeled as victim blaming by all too many people, but there is a lot of legitimacy in saying women (and men) need to be "taught not to get raped". I mean it's really more like teaching people to protect themselves from being taken advantage of or being in a vulnerable situation in public especially when there aren't a lot of witnesses and you don't know anybody. I haven't always been as careful as I should be, myself, and while I wouldn't charac…
/r/MensRights07/05/16 04:47 PM
1

I mean why is it so shit? And suspect?
/r/MensRights07/05/16 03:14 PM
2

I don't think competitiveness is especially relevant here; tests and games are both competitive. The way I see it, if you're viewing a test as a game, you are probably a lot less concerned with the (probably female) teacher's evaluation, which is something boys are generally not interested in. I mean I always wanted my academic work to be something I judged as quality work, and never kept track of my grades in any course or my GPA at all throughout college, unless I needed the information for a …
/r/MensRights07/05/16 03:00 PM
3

What the fuck is this site and why does it exist?
/r/MensRights07/05/16 02:14 PM
3

r/shittyvenndiagrams Seriously the fuck is this?
/r/MensRights07/05/16 01:44 PM
3

Aww didn't mean to "trigger" you sorry. 😕
/r/MensRights07/05/16 01:23 PM
1

It should really be common knowledge by now that testosterone has a moderating effect on emotions, including negative emotions. People who genuinely love and understand men would never consider this a remotely bad thing in itself. I adore a man who thinks clearly because of exceptional emotional stability and control. I also appreciate the desire for dominance which such men show; there is nothing degrading about being dominated by the right man, and is not some one-sided state of servitude, as …
/r/MensRights07/05/16 03:38 AM
3

This combined with your screenname reads as naive, sophomoric, simplistic tripe. Competition and cooperation are not mutually exclusive, first of all, by any stretch of the imagination. Ever hear of team sports? Cooperation is as fundamentally necessary as competition in traditionally male spheres. What you may be confusing with cooperation when it comes to female spheres and socialization, is agreeableness, which can easily block even the possibility of cooperating towards a goal because consen…
/r/MensRights07/05/16 03:26 AM
2

So basically this isn't even remotely like the Adam Johnson (decidedly not pedophile footballer) case.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:21 AM
5

The furious mother of a 14-year-old schoolboy bedded by an obsessed Jedward fan has likened her to football paedophile Adam Johnson. Umm, he's literally not a pedophile. A fifteen-year-old girl who is sexually active, fraternizes with celebrity footballers and brags about this is just about as far as you can get for all practical purposes from an innocent prepubescent victim of adult instrumentalization. I dunno about these boys. They were probably instrumentalized and feel a lot more confused t…
/r/MensRights04/05/16 11:36 PM
7

"But instead of making contacts to boost their careers, the women discussed how to use their collective power to improve the city." Now that is fucking rich. They are literally talking about the organized nagging of men into using their own power as the builders and maintainers of cities to cater to their petty interests, and calling it "using their collective power". Women.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 06:08 PM
10

That's why they are always on about how men want to "control" women. It's projection. People are listening to women who are essentially saying "Well if we were in power we would deliberately disadvantage the opposite sex and elevate our own sex by design, so that must be how men in power think too"—and then giving these shrews power! That is the opposite of how to treat people who express the belief that power is necessarily self-serving; you want them to have fucking no power.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 06:08 PM
7

But men should grow out of juvenile behavior like "having high energy" or "being happy", "bantering", "competing" and "inventing/innovating". You know, everything that has brought us modern civilization but isn't allowed in schools.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 04:55 AM
9

Fuck them and fuck coeducation.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 09:58 PM
1

Yes but not everyone who doesn't grow out of bitchiness uses that excuse.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 02:32 PM
2

This sounds exactly like something some immature radfem tantrum-thrower from the '70s would write. Nothing comes even close to sounding as pathetic and impotently bitter than man-hating like this.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 03:31 AM
10

Not sure if sjws or just typical bitches.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 10:22 PM
2

Eh. Fair enough. Plenty of white supremacists don't actually hate other races, but I'm not gonna tell a black dude who thinks they're all evil assholes that he's wrong. Feminism was built on the idea of women's moral superiority and deserves to be regarded in a way consistent with how we regard other groups commonly considered hate groups. That's all.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 08:45 PM
3

I doubt it would surprise anyone, though. They just come up with ways to rationalize it. "Oh well men are more attracted to risk." Okay, yeah, risk—like running a fucking company? "Oh heavens no! That's just oppression of women!"
/r/MensRights29/04/16 08:34 PM
24

Women are the primary victims of women not being punished as harshly as men because it means women aren't taken as seriously so really the relatively harsh treatment men have to endure all their lives is privilege.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 08:26 PM
6

My favorite response to this sort of thing is "Sounds like a personal problem."
/r/MensRights29/04/16 08:21 PM
1

But all those who aren't evil are those who would be considered "anti-feminists" by the vast majority of feminists and by all leaders of the cult.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 08:18 PM
2

Feminists are simply evil and always have been.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 06:19 PM
1

Wait she is being named when she "merely" made a false accusation, while the accused is not being named for legal reasons? What universe have I fallen into?
/r/MensRights29/04/16 03:49 AM
1

No because this never happened.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 12:30 AM
1

Pretty much. You can't have one without the other, but more to the point, it's incoherent to suggest the artificial feminization of power structures ("smashing the patriarchy") as a solution to either, as women are every bit as invested in gender roles as men are.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:50 PM
2

I don't mean to derail the discussion here, which I realize is primarily about predatory women, but I really want to point out another salient issue here which is explicitly discussed in the article itself. Of course women love bad boys. I'm so sick of people pretending that men who behave badly don't have hugely higher than average sexual capital, and calling their bad behavior "toxic/hegemonic masculinity" reinforced by "the patriarchy", as though it would even exist if there weren't a shit to…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:03 PM
5

I'm Milokin. I identify as Milo Yiannopoulos.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:41 PM
0

To be more precise/accurate, "pusil-" comes from the diminutive of "puer", meaning "boy". So "pusillanimous" is specifically an anti-male insult. EDIT: sauce
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:19 AM
1

I'm aware. This is why feminism is and has always been the most absurd religion in history.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 11:24 PM
2

And if you think I'm wrong ask yourself: why is it that every time the UN, the msm, the "New Media", etc., talk about an issue affecting women, even if it affects men more heavily (as in the case of "cyber '"'"violence"'"'" or actual violence), they report cooked statistics pertaining to women only but don't even consider looking at the male side or whether it makes sense to treat the issue as a gendered one? Because most men care primarily about women and most women definitely care almost exclu…
/r/MensRights26/04/16 08:43 PM
3

Men in power have no sense of solidarity with men in general. The idea that they do is the fundamental conceit of feminism, and is nothing but delusional projection by women who view everything through a self-serving gendered lens and never do anything for society that does not primarily advantage women by design. The truth is the gendered power game really is effectively zero-sum, or something very much like it: the more power women have the more they will take away from men. Why do you think w…
/r/MensRights26/04/16 08:29 PM
7

So the commenters are suggesting she take the opportunity to teach children, in what is undoubtedly a coed school, that they should hit males? And feminists act like they have no idea where misogyny really comes from...
/r/MensRights26/04/16 03:21 AM
2

Women don't like open discussions because being accountable for your words when they are challenged leads to too much icky "confrontation" and "mutual growth" through "intellectual" "competition". So they prefer to just sit silently feeling that they're right and you are wrong.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:02 PM
1

Nice but tell me again why sterlization cannot be used as an (additional) penalty in cases like this. Not even penalty so much as looking after the wellbeing of future generations. I mean is taking away someone's "right" to reproduce worse than the death penalty? I just don't fucking get it.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 10:54 PM
4

My mom understands how horrible circumcision is and how horrible my circumcision was. In her defense, it was hardly even my parents' decision; it was such a standard practice when she had me that she doesn't even remember anyone asking her to make a choice. But she genuinely feels bad about it. She's a good person with empathy for all living beings. But she did just recently describe herself as "not really a woman" so...lol
/r/MensRights25/04/16 03:10 AM
5

Your mom sounds like the biggest cunt.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 03:06 AM
4

Good to know, since otherwise I would probably be super fucking disappointed if I walked into one of their restaurants since honestly it sounds super gay and I'd be expecting burly Scotsmen.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 03:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter