TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Starforce2005 Archive

View 76 posts and 693 comments by Starforce2005 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
678

FeminismStarforce2005/r/MensRights04/03/23 07:22 AM
632

Legal RightsStarforce2005/r/MensRights30/01/22 02:46 PM
423

False AccusationStarforce2005/r/MensRights20/09/23 02:43 AM
392

Anti-MRMStarforce2005/r/MensRights09/01/22 01:31 AM
360

Social IssuesStarforce2005/r/MensRights04/02/24 08:14 AM
332

Legal RightsStarforce2005/r/MensRights01/05/22 11:20 PM
300

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:31 AM
248

Legal RightsStarforce2005/r/MensRights04/05/22 11:40 PM
208

Activism/SupportStarforce2005/r/MensRights21/01/22 02:34 AM
160

Activism/SupportStarforce2005/r/MensRights22/01/22 01:56 AM
158

Social IssuesStarforce2005/r/MensRights14/08/22 08:27 PM
153

DiscriminationStarforce2005/r/MensRights10/05/23 08:04 PM
149

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights04/08/25 11:23 PM
147

DiscriminationStarforce2005/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:15 PM
146

DiscriminationStarforce2005/r/MensRights02/03/23 12:14 AM
134

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights20/08/21 08:24 AM
126

False AccusationStarforce2005/r/MensRights02/10/20 11:16 PM
124

Activism/SupportStarforce2005/r/MensRights07/12/21 09:51 PM
119

discussionStarforce2005/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/23 05:45 AM
109

False AccusationStarforce2005/r/MensRights02/05/20 01:17 PM
97

Social IssuesStarforce2005/r/MensRights16/01/22 07:19 AM
96

Social IssuesStarforce2005/r/MensRights22/05/23 01:05 PM
95

Social IssuesStarforce2005/r/MensRights05/08/22 03:13 PM
94

Social IssuesStarforce2005/r/MensRights29/04/23 02:21 AM
79

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:05 PM
73

FeminismStarforce2005/r/MensRights09/08/25 02:07 AM
71

False AccusationStarforce2005/r/MensRights20/07/21 10:00 AM
66

misandryStarforce2005/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/23 12:13 AM
66

DiscriminationStarforce2005/r/MensRights19/08/22 11:16 AM
61

False AccusationStarforce2005/r/MensRights16/03/22 07:37 AM
59

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:36 AM
53

FeminismStarforce2005/r/MensRights04/04/23 02:47 PM
44

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights03/08/21 09:51 AM
44

Activism/SupportStarforce2005/r/MensRights28/12/21 06:21 AM
44

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights15/08/22 03:44 PM
42

Marriage/ChildrenStarforce2005/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:20 AM
42

social issuesStarforce2005/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/22 02:18 PM
40

False AccusationStarforce2005/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:14 PM
39

DiscriminationStarforce2005/r/MensRights16/11/20 02:58 AM
34

False AccusationStarforce2005/r/MensRights13/01/22 08:15 AM
34

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights29/04/20 06:56 AM
32

False AccusationStarforce2005/r/MensRights15/10/20 08:06 PM
26

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights23/01/22 07:01 PM
22

FeminismStarforce2005/r/MensRights05/05/20 03:25 PM
22

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights11/10/20 07:42 PM
21

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights01/08/25 08:09 AM
18

Social IssuesStarforce2005/r/MensRights27/05/22 08:13 AM
17

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights26/02/22 05:08 PM
16

False AccusationStarforce2005/r/MensRights15/10/20 08:22 PM
16

False AccusationStarforce2005/r/MensRights14/04/20 11:37 PM
16

Legal RightsStarforce2005/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:05 PM
15

Starforce2005/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:42 PM
14

False AccusationStarforce2005/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:23 PM
13

Marriage/ChildrenStarforce2005/r/MensRights11/09/22 05:46 PM
11

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights04/02/22 12:56 AM
10

Social IssuesStarforce2005/r/MensRights18/05/20 12:07 AM
9

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights14/01/23 08:54 AM
6

Social IssuesStarforce2005/r/MensRights21/12/20 07:37 AM
5

discussionStarforce2005/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/22 01:12 PM
5

Starforce2005/r/MensRights24/08/21 07:51 PM
4

False AccusationStarforce2005/r/MensRights09/10/20 07:12 AM
1

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights24/08/21 03:58 PM
1

GeneralStarforce2005/r/MensRights24/08/21 03:54 PM
1

Activism/SupportStarforce2005/r/MensRights22/01/22 01:34 AM
1

Starforce2005/r/MGTOW229/04/20 02:10 AM
1

Marriage/ChildrenStarforce2005/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:06 AM
1

misandryStarforce2005/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/22 12:33 AM
1

DiscriminationStarforce2005/r/MensRights25/02/22 07:58 AM
1

Social IssuesStarforce2005/r/MensRights04/03/23 07:21 AM
0

Marriage/ChildrenStarforce2005/r/MensRights14/01/22 05:32 AM
0

Activism/SupportStarforce2005/r/MensRights19/02/22 09:36 PM
0

Social IssuesStarforce2005/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:00 PM
0

Starforce2005/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:35 PM
0

Starforce2005/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:28 PM
0

Starforce2005/r/MensRights24/08/21 07:35 PM
0

DiscriminationStarforce2005/r/MensRights26/02/22 11:27 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Nice try, I wrote it manually
/r/MensRights11/08/25 11:59 PM
2

That's true, debating work much better when honey badger does it. This post was primarily for male MRAs, I believe they are better focusing their energy on internal structure first, because men are quite literally their own worst enemy when it comes to fighting for their own rights.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 03:32 PM
1

You spoke the covert truth of this sub
/r/MensRights10/08/25 10:56 PM
3

Men in general are easily isolated, lack emotional support, constantly being seen as toxic and predator for doing nothing, forced male gender role to sacrifice self interest, the list goes on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/25 01:52 PM
-1

You misunderstood my intention, getting the message out to the silent majority is important, posting news and statistic is good because they draw empathy. But high profile direct confrontation doesn't really work well it makes people feel your group being 'reactionary'. The silent majority doesn't really care about who is right, they can't decide which sides' truth is the real truth nor they have the incentive to do the research themselves, they also do not want to be associated with a label tha…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 03:58 AM
-3

I am not saying this sub existed to fight feminist, instead its doing a great job at presenting news and statistic to the public. What I am saying is that there are also many people here wasting their energy on directly debating feminist as if enough fact is somehow going to convince them, not only it achieves nothing, but It also has negative effect of drawing too much hostility towards you while you guys are still in a vulnerable state, which hinders growth potential. You can stop the 'polluti…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 02:24 AM
9

Because many problem men face are external not internal, therapy will not fix external issues
/r/MensRights09/08/25 01:27 AM
6

That women who offered switch is wholesome. She is the Queen.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 09:38 PM
3

Feminists are 'flexible' when it comes to its definition, they apply different standard, or different volume of that standard to different situations and maximize plausible deniability. To debate them is useless, everything you sum-up above, they can flip that narrative 180 to their liking, debating feminist is like debating ghost. What you really need to do is unite men themselves instead of try to convince feminists (the latter part could wait). Feminist also has a lot of ideology difference a…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 05:47 PM
17

All the reason the culture needs to change, and it start with men change their internal self awareness first, his own mind is his own cage, break that cage is a first step, then he can help other men, since he is self aware he no longer see other men as competition but someone to support and care.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 01:23 PM
1

Therapy can only work to a certain degree, it can't solve external issues
/r/MensRights07/08/25 01:19 PM
19

If public perception shapes part of reality, I would say the opposite is true, misandry had pushed male suicide rate up (in relative to female suicide rate)
/r/MensRights07/08/25 01:18 PM
1

I think you misunderstood, would you mind read my statement again? 'while other even with jailbreak the secondary supervisor will shutdown any 'unsafe' response, ChatGPT is one of them.' Meaning ChatGPT has a secondary supervisor, which means its protocol is very hard to bypass, not even with prompt injection, thus it closed the issue you raised about misandry is very ChatGPT-ish
/r/MensRights07/08/25 05:26 AM
28

Most LLM has root policy guideline (which are similar guideline to any other platform for the 'protected' group), some are easily jailbroken, while other even with jailbreak the secondary supervisor will shutdown any 'unsafe' response, ChatGPT is one of them.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 05:53 PM
2

100%
/r/MensRights06/08/25 05:22 PM
19

Imaging this, if someone wants to socially destroy a man, what are the options? In fact many, now think in reverse, if someone wants to socially destroy a woman, what are the options? Much fewer and way less devastating when compare to a man. On a meta level, this puts man at a asymmetrical disadvantage not just in one type of interaction, but ALL, any interaction between a man and a woman, its asymmetrical, SHE HOLDS MORE LEVERAGE THAN YOU. And this is by design... from many different sources a…
/r/MensRights06/08/25 02:31 PM
25

I prefer the wording of 'male safe space' instead of 'manosphere'
/r/MensRights06/08/25 09:43 AM
33

Instead of try to only focus on the outcome of an individual case (which by no mean to overlook it), what many people failed to understand is the underlying meta from example like this is that: there are kill switches for a man, but not for a woman.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 09:17 AM
7

Username does NOT check out. Yeah, its something I got to explain very often, the 2005 was my rebirth year (the year I transitioned), not my birth year. 😝
/r/MensRights05/08/25 06:19 PM
9

Or we can just tell the truth "men are not biologically disposable, but are made disposable by lies" The fact that male disposability are so internalized by men at this point they forgot the very concept that 'one men fertilize many women thus men are disposable' concept was first introduce by a feminist. The reality is, anything but, if you look at other mammals, male and female population are about the same without artificial interventions. Both men and women cannot create life on its own, its…
/r/MensRights05/08/25 05:50 PM
16

The biological essentialism in this sub needs to take a backseat, its not doing any good other than making more men internalizing male disposability. Social conditioning is the reason, not biology, in a thought experiment if every men stop mating, egg does not get fertilize on its own, to eliminate male disposability, men themselves needs to change, and become self aware. Women in general are experts on creating artificial female scarcity, if you spent at least sometime in female space you would…
/r/MensRights05/08/25 03:55 PM
100

Because men are viewed as 'asset' to women, men belong to women, so if the asset is destroyed, the asset owner is the victim, that is the simple logic behind these claim. Like when your hammer breaks, you wouldn't call the hammer victim, you are the one that 'lost' the hammer. In fact, many women especially those women with so called 'traditional value' think this way covertly, men are their assets. The most dehumanizing concept are with men everyday, everywhere, but men internalize these concep…
/r/MensRights05/08/25 03:53 PM
4

To be free, to live like a human, not an asset to system that dehumanize him
/r/MensRights05/08/25 03:24 PM
52

Because men are viewed as 'asset' to women, men belong to women, so if the asset is destroyed, the asset owner is the victim, that is the simple logic behind these claim. Like your when hammer breaks, you wouldn't call the hammer victim, you are the one that 'lost' the hammer. In fact, many women especially those women with so called 'traditional value' think this way covertly, men are their assets. The most dehumanizing concept are with men everyday, everywhere, but men internalize these concep…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 02:13 PM
23

If you value equality, then you should value that men have the same right to demand safety if women are allow to demand that
/r/MensRights05/08/25 02:10 PM
5

So good to hear, this is wholesome!
/r/MensRights05/08/25 12:05 PM
3

First you need to define 'they', context is important. The reality is very complex, there are many factor in play, if you like further discussion, we can discuss in chat (DM), it would be less messier than to turn this reddit post into a chat log, thus I won't be replying here further.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 10:00 AM
5

This is why the cultural norm itself needs to change, and it should first start with men themselves, start with how they treat each other, the social expectation itself is by product of the systematic exploitation of men, masculinity needs to be redefined instead of going back to that cage. Its hard, but it needs to start somewhere.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 09:16 AM
5

To escape the prison that cage men for thousands of years, to fight the systematic exploitation of men, and to fight gyncentrism
/r/MensRights05/08/25 08:09 AM
3

the in group out group bias different is a learnt behavior, its a prison for men over tens of thousands of years, men are not evil, but more proactive, this means they both do tremendously more of work compare to women in general that can be consider both good or bad, but the modern society however only highlight the portion that is bad, not the good. But what's most important is they do not highlight the proactive social conditioning of men. For example, if men are expected to stay in Kitchen, …
/r/MensRights05/08/25 07:56 AM
2

She understand men's issue on a deep both psychological and emotion level, she has both the intelligent to articulate her understand, and the empathy to have that understanding. Imaging if people like Karen Straughan become president or prime minister for just one turn, how many good thing she can do for 50% of the population
/r/MensRights04/08/25 12:40 AM
2

Very good work!
/r/MensRights04/08/25 12:21 AM
1

The sad part is, there will be one day, when people no longer see the satirical of your state, that will be truly terrifying... Internalizing misandry or internalizing oppression reaching that point is a possibility.
/r/MensRights04/08/25 12:18 AM
4

An ideology has to present itself as non exclusionary to gain mainstream validity, see what they practice, not what they claim.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 01:08 AM
3

I suggest from now on, every sane men start self advocate "I do not feel safe around women"
/r/MensRights03/08/25 01:05 AM
33

Most feminists doesn't care about men's issue, however they need to present themselves as non exclusionary to be politically valid. What a group preach is not important, look at what they practice.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 01:04 AM
1

Thank you
/r/MensRights02/08/25 11:29 AM
2

Yes, I am doing everything I can, posting on this sub is just one of the many attempt trying to get any chance of getting insight, you never know what will work :)
/r/MensRights01/08/25 06:28 PM
2

Yup, he is "Coerced" (fear of being publicly shamed which the GF eventually did) without consent. However feminist is double standard, so that doesn't count.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 09:19 PM
2

Sent (don't forget to swap the gender too)
/r/MensRights04/02/24 06:05 PM
11

Please come back alive
/r/MensRights04/02/24 05:54 PM
25

This is what happen when the system only censors one gender but not the other.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 09:41 AM
10

Obviously, this sub is probably one of those feminist echo chambers, so any guy complaining about not getting head from his GF will be verbally castrated. But if you went to an equivalently radical mens space to bitch about your girl not giving head, then the arguments would probably swing the other way. The topic I quoted was not even a feminist or women specific sub, however the point I'm trying to make is when it comes to topic related to genders - if what we meant by echo chamber, the entire…
/r/MensRights04/02/24 09:30 AM
11

You are totally right.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 09:15 AM
57

I think you missed the point, ending the relationship is one thing, framing it in a way to make the partner look like an total asshole is another. But the point is even less about the OP, but the public responses (and the amount of upvotes of course), nobody is questioning anything apart from the usual Misandrism takeaways The problem was never the choice of the individuals, but how the system would react to the same behavior when it was shown by a different gender.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 09:04 AM
60

Judging by how OP frame the whole situation, imaging what would happen if the BF initiate the conversation. I don't think the lack of communication has anything on the BF's part, if anything I would say the BF was in complete fear to not upset her (has to force himself to eat it five times literally despite being uncomfortable).
/r/MensRights04/02/24 08:51 AM
18

You are not wrong OP, the sad thing is, even many men from Ukraine had been brainwashed and coerced into accept and defend the practice as it is, I've made similar discussion about this problem in the past in this sub (about the men from age 18-60 thing), and was feverishly debated by "stockholm sydr- patriotic" Ukrainian men. I now just gave up on this topic altogether (about Ukraine at least), however I do fear that when war reach each one of our own respective countries, identical patriotic/n…
/r/MensRights22/09/23 10:58 PM
5

Conscripts are once civilian who were forced to be sent to meat grinder, they are slaves and as much if not more of a victim than any other civilian, regardless of which side or which war. The assumption of women being civilian and victim regardless, just shows their privilege of not being drafted into war in the first place in comparison to men. Imaging if the scenarios are reversed, which only women are forced to be combatant, every news then only highlight men being the innocent civilian, how…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 09:20 PM
21

You are absolutely correct, not to mention even if its only 2-10%, that's still a huge number
/r/MensRights20/09/23 03:00 AM
78

This is an unprecedentedly large scale Witch Hunt in human history
/r/MensRights20/09/23 02:59 AM
3

Its called gynocentrism
/r/MensRights22/06/23 01:19 AM
2

Its information war
/r/MensRights15/05/23 03:38 AM
1

It not the same thing, If you need very specific prompt to by pass the censorship
/r/MensRights12/05/23 01:11 PM
1

I'd call it cowardice I think you are right
/r/MensRights11/05/23 03:04 PM
10

If you look at the context of the joke in Bing Chat example its clearly towards male gender
/r/MensRights11/05/23 07:18 AM
40

I did it again with Bing Chat, the AI blocked me for asking why its biased
/r/MensRights10/05/23 08:14 PM
2

This is such a bad news, with AI affecting everything in our daily life, it will create even more power imbalance.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 01:02 PM
4

Exactly, its talking in circle, this is what happen when they censorship the bot.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 12:55 PM
3

I didn't purchase additional token for GPT. Does DAN still works? They didn't patch it or anything right?
/r/MensRights29/04/23 12:52 PM
3

Yes, I am curious
/r/MensRights29/04/23 06:26 AM
8

I know, I just hope the bot had reasoning and logic, but it seems its more information driven.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 05:16 AM
34

Yup, meaning this bot is using a censored Internet database for its source.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 02:59 AM
20

The AI searches the internet, which is a censored internet by the way, for its debate. When asked for the validity of that information, it admits it had no access to the data and the method. But it still insist that men's rights argument are biased and flawed. Thus I questioned its reasoning and logic, I don't think that count as personal, or else we would be talking in circle for eternity. However if you put it that way, it does look hilarious, I admit, even I laughed
/r/MensRights29/04/23 02:39 AM
1

You also forget "The victim of false accusation"
/r/MensRights25/04/23 09:57 PM
1

It will eventually bite them, no one is free from false accusation these days. Its been weaponized
/r/MensRights25/04/23 09:53 PM
1

True, this is why I hate gossip
/r/MensRights25/04/23 09:35 PM
0

What I meant loving each other is a much broader term than just hierarchies. You know girls typically venting and supporting each other through kind words and body language such as hug. These create emotional bond which form strong community. When men vent, other men typically call him a cry baby, this further isolates each other. On a larger scale, this create noticeable power disparity between the group. This is coming from someone who had personal experience on both sides. Sub such as mensrig…
/r/MensRights25/04/23 02:06 PM
23

If you want things to change, you need to find the root cause first Most people don't like to admit, but men really should love each other more instead keep competing against each other, the ingroup and outgroup bias disparity between the two sex is pretty obvious. On individual level this might look trivial, but when on a societal scale, it became the root cause.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 09:10 PM
8

Few karma drop is not going to stop me from speaking out the truth, I believe that's the least I could do for this movement.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 03:17 PM
14

I believe this is probably the dividing point in time between western culture and eastern culture (as chivalry has its origin in western culture, it could certainly happened much earlier, but the point here is the same) regarding the gender dynamic between men and women, and how gynocentrism is embedded into traditionalism of western culture. Of course most eastern culture are slowly converted over time due to western influence. IMO Gynocentrism is a manipulation of men's pride to benefit women,…
/r/MensRights04/04/23 02:51 PM
3

Instead of telling people what not to do, I'm all ear to hear what are you proposing?
/r/MensRights29/03/23 02:36 PM
1

I see you are with the transmed or truscum This debate is going on forever within the trans community, however there is no universal standard for "who needed it" If you are advocating better use of medical resources, it could also lead to gatekeeping. If you are afraid of Terfs and Tradon, should we compromise just because we are afraid? They have no ground for their argument other than strawmaning with exaggerated examples of sport athletes and bathroom issue
/r/MensRights19/03/23 06:55 PM
1

Its not a loophole, people have right to choose whatever they like, and it only proves feminist is wrong about male privilege, trans right is what radical feminist's most feared. When they trying to fight the trans movement, it makes their cause lost, this benefit men as group or individually.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 06:33 PM
1

Of course I see the issue, however against trans right will only hurt men's right, it does men no good, because you are literally trying to get rid of what radical feminist fear the most. If you don't know how much they feared it, just look at how they are even willing to team up with conservative/traditionalist just to get rid of trans movement, they literally team up with their worse enemy. People are not dumb, trans movement is the key to expose feminist lies
/r/MensRights19/03/23 06:31 PM
-15

I don't see why this is a problem for men's right, isn't equal right a good thing, at least biological male have a choice, isn't it? If anything this should only upset the terfs and tradcons.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 10:14 AM
3

Great analyze, I find that feminist's first priority isn't even to help women, but instead trying to tear men down.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 08:45 PM
12

This reply is gold
/r/MensRights04/03/23 03:13 PM
48

Or could it also being understood from the perspective that men that attempted simply wasn't publicly announced? Since men are shamed for showing weakness.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 08:06 AM
1

What men is conditioned to do by the society, feminism call it toxic masculinity, if they really dislike these traits, they should start helping by remove these very condition, not victim blaming.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 07:07 AM
1

But there is such a thing as "no choice" and "dire situation". Instead of no choice, many people are not giving a choice to leave, if you are not support it, then stop justifying it. I was just against piling up together aggressor's and a victim's issues. That is what russian propaganda uses ro blur the lines and get away from responsibility. This post was never about the Ukrainian war, this post is about anti male only conscription, but if you have to bring it up, then from my view both Russian…
/r/MensRights03/03/23 11:41 AM
0

There is difference on wich side they are, because this war is a result of unprovoked agression from russia against our country. You are victim-blaming and bluring the lines, wich are actually pretty clear. What you said here has nothing to do with my point, nobody is victim blaming anyone, in fact the real victim are those innocent people that are forced into the war, regardless of which side. You are wrong. We pretty much care wich party wins the war, because russia commits war crimes, such as…
/r/MensRights03/03/23 10:39 AM
1

Tell this to yourself more often, please. Along with "get reliable sources" and "stop lying". That would greatly increase your credibility. Where is your credibility other than strawmanning rather than give credible source? Aren't you the one lying? On topic: we, here in 🇺🇦, are also not happy, to say the least, about baning guys of conscription age to cross the border. And currently have a major discussion. So you admit people are not happy with that, you just contradict yourself Alas, right no…
/r/MensRights03/03/23 10:26 AM
0

No I'm not, I'm opposing involuntary conscription, stop strawman, you could fight however you like, not allowing people to leave is dictatorship period.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 09:23 AM
1

The rich people hypothetical example was force donation, not tax, but it doesn't matter, I later added few more example at the bottom, the point is the same As for #3 The reason average male which they considered having suitable physical condition such as bone density etc. was strictly tie to chromosomes, same as how female was able to give birth, these traits are undetachable from biological sex, that was my point, of course there are cultural factor, but I was strictly talking about physical c…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 07:30 PM
2

Its regulated to solely benefit one group.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 01:37 PM
1

Female manipulation mainly comes in the form of DARVO, search that word up. It's way more painful to deal with comparing to typical abuse such as yelling or name calling.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 01:35 PM
12

Feminist only support eliminating it for both gender when draft for both sex was brought up, while other times I do see feminist claim that male only conscription is justifiable because they claim women have hardship for child birth, but they rarely address the difference between one being forced while the other being free will. Main while conservatives were always the main offender for this argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/23 01:22 PM
2

The point here is not about which occupation, is about whether its forced or not, police is not mandatory for every male citizen.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 01:19 PM
1

Slavery is what dictatorship does, you judge a government not by what it claims, but by what it does. Just like Putin never claim itself to be dictatorship, but what it does is.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 01:18 PM
0

Again you keep on using the umbrella term of ethnicity to represent free will of individuals You are using what media portrayed selective scene to represent an entire group. If the sacrifice is being made for a rightful cause Every dictator love using that line. Putin use the same type of speech to mobilize its citizen for his evil war. Rightful cause is a subjective term every dictator uses, but people dying is an objective fact. War itself is a political game by the politicians
/r/MensRights02/03/23 12:38 PM
1

There is no credible source indicates the majority is by choice, or else it wouldn't even need a policy that forbids every men from leaving. And no, sacrificing innocent people makes you the devil too. Evil politician always use excuse like that to force people into war, average citizen is not evil, its not about Ethnicity. If you care about killing another ethnicity for your idea, you should enlist, but it had no bearing on forcing others.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 12:28 PM
2

No, Ukrainian people are fighting for their own choice, they are not being brainwashed, because Ukraine decided to move democracy way Ukrainian people is an umbrella term, sure there are people who fight by choice, but there are also people that are forced, I'm not against their will to fight, I'm against the policy that forbidden men to leave, its not the same thing.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 12:21 PM
1

War is always an extension of politic, Russian used that same argument to mass its army too (for national security). In case of Ukraine - end does justify the means, because Ukraine is fighting for a freedom of civilized choice. Freedom of civilized choice is also an political idea, mind you. And no for those men that are forced into meat grinder against their will, its no different which side they are on. Same goes for the Russian, every men that are conscripted by force in Russian is also unde…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 12:09 PM
6

I’m okay with women not going to war I’m okay with men being conscripted You are okay with men being conscripted, conscription is forcing people into meat grinder. Male only conscription is solely based on biological sex, not capability, even weaker men are still mandatory for it.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 11:58 AM
3

untrained women wont be drafted. Same goes for untrained men, war situation should have no bearing on this. In case of all out warfare (if we weren't a nato country) i wouldn't force the bearers of our next generation to go die in the meat grinder. Thats a good way for my country and ethnicity to stop existing If you admit it was about women being able to give birth, so why do you only support men being conscripted into meat grinder, but do not support women being conscripted into child birth if…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 11:51 AM
3

I'm pretty sure he is just using sarcasm to make a point, nobody should ever be be forced to became meat shields, but if conservatives and feminists supports forcing men into meat grinder, then its equivalent as making women as meat shields, that was his point.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 11:43 AM
5

Because to them, equality is only for benefit, never for hardship or burden, and it surely was never about capabilities, everything only matter or doesn't matter solely depends on what or what does not benefits them. Similar to how they will support biological determinism in area that benefit them, at the same time despise biological determinism when it does not. Similar to how they despise conservatism when it comes to abortion, but totally supports conservatism when it comes to male only consc…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 11:35 AM
1

Exactly, go whichever country treat you the best, thus the best government gets the best support from people all around the world.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 11:31 AM
1

This is why both Russian and Ukraine are not a government worth fighting for, the proof is there, the citizen living in both country suffers, it doesn't matter who wins the war, it sucks to live under both government. The only reason some people are cheering for Ukraine is because proxy war mentality (rather them suffer than me), the very same people that's cheering for Ukraine would never allow him/herself to be put into that situation, or else he/she would volunteer to fight for Ukraine him/he…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 11:25 AM
4

Your point C is valid, warmongers are perfect candidates for that job
/r/MensRights02/03/23 11:22 AM
2

Then you should enlist, good luck to you, your martyr complex should have no bearing on the decision of the others. And if you are a woman, then you are womansplainning mens problem which you should stop.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 11:09 AM
4

Who are capable who are not will be decided on individual level, not based on sex Capability should never be an excuse for slavery End does not justify the means, war situation does not justify conscription, same as it does not justify slavery nor forced prostitution or rape, nor does it justify forced child birth for not having enough meat shields, nor does it justified robbing its citizen for provisions because it lacks supply. If everything else should not be justified in war and are consider…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 11:05 AM
1

If you care about winning the war so much, you are free to enlist, what you are saying have nothing to do with my point. I don't support conscription at all, especially adding sexism against men on top of it, period.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 11:01 AM
9

If that is the case, then that is an argument for not having women (or very, very few) in the military, police or in any capacity where they might need to fight. You really can't have it both ways!! So women join the military and get easier physical requirements to pass boot camp which is ridiculous because a combat situation is not going to be politically correct or worried about woke. This is strawman, what you said here just proved what I mentioned above as fallacy Male only conscript is forc…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 03:04 AM
1

Can and forced are different things
/r/MensRights02/03/23 02:57 AM
7

Any culture, any time period, men were always the ones that's been sent to the meat grinders never women, yet feminist still claim women are the one being oppressed. So the "factual" bit doesn't really matter to them. That being said, I personally against any rules that violates free will, conscription should be abolished long ago, the end should never justify the mean, or else that end is not worth fighting for in the first place. If slavery is used to fight tyranny, then what makes your govern…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 02:15 AM
4

If you are unable to debate the idea, then attack the person, typical feminist tactics
/r/MensRights01/03/23 04:30 PM
27

Rape should need HARD evidence
/r/MensRights01/03/23 04:23 PM
1

I'm a leftist, I support equality and progression Thus I support this sub
/r/MensRights28/02/23 02:30 PM
-9

Don't listen to him, I'm a transgender too and I support equal rights between the genders. This sub is inclusive, its just that some individuals here holds dear to their conservatism ideology, they don't represent everyone.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 11:51 AM
7

I'm really sorry to hear that, he have my sympathy, unfortunately other than give him emotion support there is really nothing else we could do, however this type of support could sometime means the difference between living and commit suicide, especially for man that literally had no way out, knowing someone will still hear him might give him hope.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 11:29 AM
-28

What twisted language? And what does that has to do with the topic? People could express themselves however they like it, we are all normal.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 11:20 AM
25

You are being a great person for even listening to him, its rare in our society which most people will just assume the man are always the abuser, props to you first. If what you said is true, I would also assume he doesn't have financial means to see a lawyer or even reach out to a therapist (who will listen to his story and kept records). Does he have any friends or family he could safely speak to without judging him?
/r/MensRights27/02/23 11:05 AM
24

Did he mention the reason why he can't leave the relationship? I'm asking this is that sadly in our current society, if the man have the option of simply leaving the relationship without the threat of losing what he cared for (for some people its the kid, for others it might be a lifetime of hard earned property) , it might be his best bet. An abusive relationship is bad for everyone, but in the case of men being the victim, it could be easily turnaround and shift the blame onto him.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 10:50 AM
26

Can you provide a little bit of context?
/r/MensRights27/02/23 10:35 AM
1

They do selective statistic as well For example Men and Women's rate of getting injured in a domestic fight is 2/5 But they ignore the fact that the rate of getting stabbed is 7/2
/r/MensRights27/02/23 09:58 AM
2

Male sex drive is stimulated through these industry, its a cycle The world is full of temptation for young men, the porn, the sex service and even how their desired gender's choice of cosmetic
/r/MensRights27/02/23 09:48 AM
2

Any push for people to behave certain way is bad, everyone should have freedom to express whatever they want, meaning men should have the freedom be manly, girly, emotional or stoic without systematic stigmatization.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 09:34 AM
4

The best action you can do now is to continue to make your own space/circles, the more the better! Just like someone said in the comment section, the last thing you want now is negative PR, the time has yet to come, you are not large enough to make an impact yet. What feminist want the most is to kill your movement at its infancy, any wave you created while not strong enough could be used against you. A little bit Art of War from Sun Tzu may help, never confront your enemy when you are not big e…
/r/MensRights27/02/23 09:18 AM
2

Exactly, and we have tradcon to thank for that. These traditionalists ideology is the major offender for enabling such disparity in coalition
/r/MensRights27/02/23 08:56 AM
3

voluntarily entered More of scammed into by education, media, and society in general Young men are not informed of the slave contract nature of marriage, instead they were tricked into think marriage is their ultimate goal.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 08:53 AM
1

There an easier way to understand men better than any books. Just try to think "How would I feel if the rules are gender reversed" This is how I personally understand their problem. For example men in Ukraine are forced to fight the war regardless of their background, training, or belief, solely because of their gender while women gets to choose whether to stay or leave solely because of their gender, how would that make you feel if it was reversed?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/23 08:44 AM
2

Have a tendency to explain things has nothing to do with gender
/r/MensRights12/02/23 07:08 AM
15

Because they have in group bias
/r/MensRights12/02/23 05:06 AM
6

I can't speak for cis women, but as a trans women, I have strong sympathy for men expressing negative emotion in front of me (even more so than cis women), because I understand what they had been through and how they are conditioned to live under such pressure, so when a men breaks down, it means it must be tremendous pain. Sometime I don't know how to react is solely due to not sure of the appropriate reaction, I wish them feel accepted but at the same time don't want them to feel being disresp…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:03 PM
7

As a trans woman, many of the assumption terfs commonly makes are just scapegoat, most trans don't agree that trans people should compete against women in sport, they made it a big deal just to make us look silly. Its like they take one rare example and amplify it to represent an entire group, same as how they treat men. Another side note every trans person may have varied biology, some take puperty block and did SRS before grown to adult, meaning their physical property are not entirely the sam…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:46 PM
3

As trans women myself, I just want to ask all the terfs out there, how had we ever wronged you? Being a trans women in my country is already tough as it is, most of us don't wish any trouble, we just want to blend in with the society and peacefully live out our life. Most trans women don't mind going to gender neutral bathroom if there was one, we just need to pee like everyone else.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:40 AM
17

Some radical feminist will tell you that allowing male only space will enhance misogyny I don't know about that since there are practically none, but female only space do mostly enhance misandry, some of the examples are TwoX, FDS, etc.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:37 AM
11

I'm curious what privileges men have?
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:33 AM
2

Stop using the term weak men, imaging if feminist using the term weak women. By the way you describe things, you sound like a traditionalist which makes you part of the problem People should always have choice regardless of gender, weak men is a very misandric term because its primarily used as a tool to shame and manipulate men, people rarely use "weak women" making that term a gender exclusive degrading term, its also a form of victim blaming strategy adopted by the traditionalists.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 11:20 AM
2

Tate keep saying men have duty to do X, men have duty to do Y or else you are a coward is typical traditionalism male disposability nonsense. Imaging if women telling other women they have duty to behave in a self harm, altruistic manner, or shaming other women for not follow their gender role, she would be called internalizing misogyny. Tate doesn't give shit about men, he only brag about himself to make him look like better person while throw other men under the bus, its the same mentality of …
/r/MensRights15/01/23 10:18 AM
5

Good narrative requires simplicity for publicity, amazing video
/r/MensRights05/11/22 01:51 AM
1

They did this bs to almost every statistic, its like only women are human They also hid behind the mask of "women and children" to hide the reality that boys life also doesn't matter compare to girls
/r/MensRights05/11/22 01:46 AM
46

If the society wants men to share their feelings, its the societies job to ensure the safety of that individual for expressing it in the first place. Not this victim blaming bs
/r/MensRights05/11/22 01:44 AM
5

False accusation is the new witch hunt
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/22 02:23 AM
1

The creator of this video points out some interesting facts regarding the similarity between misandrism and racism, and how the system demonize men represents what the Nazi did to Jews before WWII
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/22 12:36 AM
8

The sad truth is even if you are proven innocent, the stigma will still follow you, false accusation is the new witch hunt, sorry to hear this is happening to you
/r/MensRights01/11/22 12:13 AM
7

If you swap the word women/girl to Nazi German, men/boy to Jews, this makes more sense now, what their true campaign was in reality
/r/MensRights01/11/22 12:07 AM
3

This is exactly what I'm talking about in the past and ignored on this sub. Feminism is worse than communist and fascism because feminism have at least half of the population as their base of support, in other word "globally" as the video describes
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:59 PM
6

Edit: Just to clarify, I’m not talking about issues such as male victims of abuse not being taken seriously or false accusations. I’m talking about social “privileges” that minority groups have recently “acquired” and them being viewed as an “attack” on “mens rights”. Give me an example of "social privileges" you are talking about? If not I would assume how men compare to women in terms of social advantage, first thing comes to mind would be men are less likely to receive help and care compare t…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:51 PM
2

India's anti male practice gives me a similar vibe to UK, aside from India men also suffer from traditionalism
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:49 PM
2

You underestimated sexual market place on a mass scale's influence over politics
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:46 PM
7

There is a bit difference there The misandry you described are mainly a result due to media portraying of men The misogyny you've described however are mainly a result of real life experiences Of course there are exceptions, but at least that's the general conclusion at the moment To give a better illustration of this, a female colleague student hating men that participated in misandric SJW movement is different than a middle aged "deadbeat" dad hating women due to trauma. However the former (my…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 10:38 AM
1

Most people confuse the "state of after death" with the "process of dying" "being forced to do something is worst than death" is nonsense, because how force work in the first place is use the process of death as a threat, meaning people are being forced because they are afraid of dying. If logic is what she stated, then force would never exist, people will fight to the death (even if in vain), since death is better by her standard. Same logic fallacy happens in all sorts of feminist argument, li…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 12:22 PM
1

Most people confuse the "state of after death" with the "process of dying" "being forced to do something is worst than death" is nonsense, because how force work in the first place is use the process of dying as a threat, meaning people are being forced because they are afraid of dying. If logic is what she stated, then force would never exist, people will fight to the death (even if in vain), since death is better by her standard. Same logic fallacy happens in all sorts of feminist argument, li…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 12:12 PM
2

I'm not a UK citizen, but I'm curious to know, what makes UK the most men hating country in the world? What is the reason behind it?
/r/MensRights27/10/22 01:29 AM
2

Just treat men as equally as women in all manner (not selectively), and I would say you are a true MRA supporter. Feminist fight for equally, but selectively, this is their ultimate downfall
/r/MensRights27/10/22 01:27 AM
5

Brilliant comment!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/22 08:53 PM
1

Feminist hate pornography for men, despite what they claim (encouraging sexual crime etc), their real purpose is however completely opposite: is to restrict men's access to sex alternatives (they absolutely hated the idea of sex bot), so they could make sure the sex marketplace monopoly women have over men stays that way. Porn decrease libido to a certain degree, meaning more men could focus on their own life more instead of seeking sex from the opposite gender (which is exactly what feminists w…
/r/MensRights23/10/22 08:37 PM
3

Absolutely disgusting, just like all wars
/r/MensRights23/10/22 08:29 PM
107

Comparing conscription and atrocity of war to pregnancy (especially with modern technology) is unfair The former is slavery, the latter is a choice The former endure much more hardship and restriction of freedom, the latter is not The former is an insult to human right and dignity, the latter is not The former is considered disposable, the latter is cared for and loved The list could go on, but I get your point If men are given a choice to either be pregnant and have his child and family love hi…
/r/MensRights23/10/22 08:08 PM
1

I'm not UK citizen, I hope you guys success!
/r/MensRights23/10/22 08:05 PM
1

Both Russia and Ukraine are equally oppressive to men, in time of war, its all the same Human history are filled with wars, how could feminist possibility claim women historically suffer more than men do? Nothing changes in terms of Queen regnant, meaning feminist's claim that men did this to men are completely false. Even if the rulers are men, it still doesn't justify the victim blaming, would feminist excuse oppression to women if the ruler were female?
/r/MensRights23/10/22 07:59 PM
1

No draft > Equal draft > Men-only draft Men-only draft is the definition of gender discrimination
/r/MensRights23/10/22 07:54 PM
1

Many MGTOW philosophy actually got the truth right, I agree with most of their philosophy But MGTOW does not replace MRA (which some MGTOWer believes), because it only address men's problem when it involves relationship, however live as a man facing many challenge and hardship that has nothing to do with relationships, such as conscription, isolation, violence, difficulty of getting help, disposability, misandrism etc. MGTOW rarely talk about issue outside of relationships, I tried really hard t…
/r/MensRights23/10/22 07:47 PM
2

Women's jail are a joke compare to men's
/r/MensRights23/10/22 07:41 PM
23

Both Russian government, and Russian women who practice this is disgusting, they are the ones who deserve to die
/r/MensRights23/10/22 07:28 PM
2

well said
/r/MensRights19/10/22 05:31 PM
1

Survey will always be a flawed way of forming statistics about reality. The only thing survey is good at is gathering opinion, not reality
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:30 PM
6

The only way for us to peacefully fight back now is: Not cooperate
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:25 PM
14

Live at the mercy of other is not a healthy life. The system worked against men in every way possible, when you are solely at the mercy of that person, you are under the control of that person, its just like a slave contract, a good slave master is still a slave master Not to mentioned people could change, even if that person was once great. Affection for the opposite gender could blind people, I just like to point that out
/r/MensRights19/10/22 02:06 AM
2

People tend to forget why we have children in the first place, they just blindly do it because of tradition or what they feel like the "right thing" to do. But in reality, having child is about receiving love from that child (we want to be loved, especially for us men because we receive much less love from the society than women do), meaning we want our children to love us (of course love is mutual, father love their child too), however in modern day, children are taught to hate their father, wh…
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:55 AM
1

There is objective equality and subjective equality, your equality is the latter. Anyone could have their own version equality, but these are not equality
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:52 AM
1

Female prison is a joke compare to male prison anyways
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:50 AM
3

Its funny in most entertainment media (movie, TVs) men are commonly portrayed with excessive ego. But from my personal reality, I experienced the complete opposite. Most men I've encounter are very humble and forgiving If you don't believe me, go do some experiment yourself, both IRL or on the internet (which is safer), and see for yourself which gender is easer to get offended by making identical comment. At least for me, I wouldn't even dare to say anything remotely negative if the person is a…
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:24 AM
20

Most men experienced some form of emotion abuse from a women either from his mother or his wife (or both) without the man defining them as abuse because of traditional value that shackles him
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:16 AM
3

The marketplace was monopolized by one party, its just as simple as that
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:12 AM
31

I would go as far as saying do not follow this man's footstep to get married or have a child in the first place. Life will be much happier and easier without all these problem to worry about.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:07 AM
1

Even without no-fault divorce, the "fault" could simply to crafted and planned, and the society will believe the women.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:04 AM
1

They should be, what is the point of having a children that could hate you anytime?
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:02 AM
1

Its not hard wired, I don't agree with biological determinism, culture could change.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:59 AM
1

For those of people saying "In my country is still possible" You should add "only for now" Law are subjugated to change, once you get married but the law somehow changed you are screwed, no matter which country you live, marriage is not safe
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:57 AM
3

Marriage is a slave contract
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:55 AM
1

This post is godsend
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:50 AM
18

mods tend to be a bit strict about critiques of feminism. Remove the word "a bit" and you are correct
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:49 AM
1

Search how Ancient Rome punish its troop (which are conscripted men), people are stoned to death just for falling asleep on duty or lying to its superiors (the duty itself is forced service, a form of slavery anyways), a 10th of an army (decimation) could be executed just because the unit retreat in battle without order or other offenses on a larger scale, regardless of the fault of the individual (meaning you could be killed just because your comrade committed faults). these kind of atrocities …
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:23 AM
1

Plain language benefits those who stay to the truth, which benefits men's right movement the most.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 03:19 AM
112

Which translate to "Guilty until proven Innocent"
/r/MensRights12/09/22 03:15 AM
1

How do we reclaim this power for ourselves as men. Men needs to be selfish which they failed to do so for a long time
/r/MensRights12/09/22 03:13 AM
3

Of course I support it, I also support trans right, both MTF and FTM
/r/MensRights12/09/22 03:11 AM
36

Subtract the word "dating" in your title and you are correct
/r/MensRights12/09/22 02:54 AM
20

Yup, because men can't distribute food at all when they have none
/r/MensRights12/09/22 02:53 AM
12

The more you tolerate, the worst the expectation will be, give an inch and they will take a yard. The source of the problem is men are not selfish enough.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 02:48 AM
4

Its disgusting how the society is lying about marriage, search "marriage men" on search engine like google, the results are complete scams that destroys many men.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 02:43 AM
7

These kind of experiments had been done for many times and different varieties Such as public react differently to men yelling at women vs women yelling at men, men ask for help vs women ask for help etc. The society (especially feminist) doesn't care even if you bring objective facts
/r/MensRights12/09/22 02:40 AM
10

What we should be fighting against are: Female privilege, Misandry, Empathy gap What we should be fighting for are: Equal accountability, Liberation of men from traditional expectation
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 04:44 PM
2

I think it would help us to better approach your problem by lay out points of disagreement with your boyfriend in a list example: Point 1, I thinks X(whatever your view is) he thinks Y(whatever his view is) Point 2, I thinks X he thinks Y So forth
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/22 09:52 AM
19

The real problem was never "men don't talk", instead its "men cannot talk" Men are viewed by the society as having no intrinsic value The only reason women are always listened to and cared for is because society view them with intrinsic value think it this way: No body give a crap about how a chair, a table, a spoon feels, because these object only have value when they serve a purpose, its their only value, this is the case for men. When men begin to "speak out", they lose their extrinsic purpos…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/22 03:47 PM
1

Women have much better social advantage than men do
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/22 04:57 PM
15

Its called collective guilt
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/22 06:11 AM
0

I guess they have to use archive dot org is because most feminist propaganda site deleted and altered that original statement from her
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/22 10:05 PM
2

here you you go
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/22 08:06 PM
2

Feminist claim to support for LGBT, but in reality they only support L B(f) T(ftm) They are biological determinist
/r/MensRights23/08/22 08:01 PM
0

I saw post in the past talking about this in mensright sub
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/22 06:51 PM
30

Its difficult to wake these people up from menslib, but we still need to try ------------------ Edit: That person called babylock in that reference post is typical example of how feminists love to play with words and semantics, talking in an ambiguous way on purpose to get away with a lots of nonsense and logical fallacies. This ambiguity of a cultish preacher is a perfect tool for brainwashing and gaslighting its targeted audience into their cult. Cultish behavior are the result of irrational t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/22 02:16 PM
29

The argument that "Men hits harder" is easily debunked by: If a man hit a woman with that of a forced less or equal to her would not be count as violence A lighter weight class male hitting another male of heavier weight class is not violence If a woman with a shotgun killed a man with a handgun by self defense would not count as self defense because the former had stronger fire power You have to admit, the mental gymnastic these feminist went through to justify everything is incredible, Even El…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/22 02:03 PM
5

These false accuser never count as perjury for their false testimonies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/22 09:47 AM
42

If the gender were reversed, if men sending these baits with sexual self portrait attached, and when this happen on a large scale as what these women is currently doing, you bet its a sexual harassment
/r/MensRights23/08/22 03:20 AM
1

My guess is when most people claim this by providing "statistic" as proof, the way how the statistic was formulated is questionable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/22 03:17 AM
1

where did that 90% statistic came from?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/22 02:53 AM
1

Warren Farrell and Christina Hoff Sommers are not feminists today by anyone's definition. They are far higher quality people than any feminists, yet feminists reject them - and that's perhaps the only thing I agree with feminists on. Yes I know, but remember the only reason they could change in the first place is because they are people with principles, they actually went all out with their ideology, that's why when they face the reality they could admit they were wrong. However those people tha…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 01:33 PM
1

You know the feminist notoriously created the infamous Duluth model right? At least she have the audacity to admit she is wrong and debunked her own theory later. Is she anti-male? Yeah, but at least she had principles. This is the "feminist". However most people we perceived as "feminist" today, include what you've mentioned "entirely typical, average feminists." are just selfish people justifying their selfishness by using whatever ideology to suit themselves, they could claim themselves tradi…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 01:23 PM
9

This is why biological determinism is both unscientifical and unethical The conservatives cherish the idea of men are smarter than women when science research show the general intelligence are identical. Thus we have this "A person with a brain of an adult but with the accountability of a child" result.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/22 09:06 AM
1

Instead of telling men to open up, what we should be doing is to create a supportive environment for men and boys, if men feel safe about the environment they will open up themselves without the need to tell them too. At least that's how things suppose to work, in this particular order
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/22 08:26 AM
26

That's how traditionalism works, the responsibility of a woman in a traditional society are near that of a child, not only rape law were gendered, but even laws that are gender neutral on paper in reality still rarely held woman responsible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/22 06:52 AM
4

The "feminist" in your context are actually "egoist" or women that use feminism to justify their selfishness. Although feminism ideology is anti-male, but at least they have their principles But I can assure most of those people that we perceived as feminist in reality are just selfish women that shift to whatever ideology to benefit themselves. These people will do or say whatever necessary to fulfill their selfish desire and use whatever ideology to justify that selfishness. Some prime example…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 12:23 AM
39

At this point, they don't care, its similar as how most people don't care about the difference between feminist, radfem, and terf Whatever ideology, as long as its pro-male, they will ban you
/r/MensRights21/08/22 04:02 PM
12

Great video, we need people like them
/r/MensRights21/08/22 01:37 PM
1

For example Organization that focus on dictating Wiki page is certainly a targeted agenda
/r/MensRights19/08/22 06:51 PM
2

I would say its Zeitgeist and targeted agenda at the same time depend on which group which university, which community, which organization we are talking about, they all have different agenda that is.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 06:50 PM
5

This just proves they only admit mutual abuse exist when the case favors the men. When the abuse case favors the women mutual abuse suddenly doesn't exist. If we are to be fair by applying their logic back to them, then Depp is the sole victim, there is no mutual abuse.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 04:25 PM
2

If its about striking force, than it should apply between man vs man too, a larger figure should never fight back. Which is nonsense, and they never apply the same logic anywhere else This just proves, Feminist is a sexist cult
/r/MensRights19/08/22 04:23 PM
5

As a result Duluth model itself became a tool for altering statistic
/r/MensRights19/08/22 01:34 PM
5

Xmen: Cyclops cheated on by Jean Grey every ten minutes because she saw Wolverine and had him simp for her for decades. Writers continuously do him bad. You haven't mentioned when Cyclops is being mentally abused by Emma Frost into sex when he suffer from grievance, people actually blame Cyclops the one for being unfaithful If the gender were reversed, people would call that victim blaming and Emma a rapist
/r/MensRights19/08/22 12:22 PM
11

Yeah, that what gets me, this kind of unfair treatment had undergone so many year already , but the general populace still aren't unaware of the discriminative nature of it. Its funny how this is happening even the original creator of the Duluth model had debunked herself
/r/MensRights19/08/22 12:04 PM
1

The point I'm trying to make is not that I can't find a more reasonable website (even if they are rare), but how easily the misconception is presented to the populaces.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 11:56 AM
98

Because opinion on a mass scale could affect social awareness, they do not wish men to be recognize as human being, or else it would defeat their oppression from patriarchy theory. Silencing people is always a way to defeat its political enemy, to feminist men are the enemy
/r/MensRights19/08/22 11:41 AM
1

Far from it, if I were to describe it, think it as stock market, its like a retraction after a long period of bullish momentum
/r/MensRights18/08/22 04:12 AM
4

Many resources are inefficient and marked as female-hate websites by some people. I want to change it. Sadly that's not going to happen. Anything pro-male is consider misogyny in today's standard, in their mind, its us or them. If you are dedicated to create a Wiki site, you will have to endure it. Think it as "Spreading words of Atheism in Medieval Catholic Europe"
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:04 PM
6

They will just exclude Amber Heard and claim she is the exception
/r/MensRights16/08/22 03:17 AM
3

The way how they definite rape is also ridiculous.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 08:59 PM
2

She is typical "aggression through proxy" by slander you in your back, a very manipulative and abusive person
/r/MensRights15/08/22 08:58 PM
1

And when the civil war actually happens, men are the one dying, after the war (even if they lost), they just shift their ideology and play the good wife. It's a win-win for them from the start.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:36 PM
9

The problem is not with the % of happy marriage, but with if the marriage goes wrong the consequences for the man is too large to ignore. Think of it like this, the chances of an air plane crashes is very rare, but every airline still need to do their absolutely best to maintain safety, because when it happens its devastating.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 03:55 PM
6

When did our civilization reduced to this?
/r/MensRights15/08/22 03:38 PM
0

It's those systems and institutions. Yup, Hate the game, not the players
/r/MensRights15/08/22 08:55 AM
2

Good article The problem lies in that the male characteristic of aggression is heavily punished by the society, while female's are not, this left a huge power imbalanced.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 07:56 AM
5

What a manipulator
/r/MensRights14/08/22 11:44 PM
2

I feel you, what an emotional manipulator
/r/MensRights14/08/22 11:36 PM
3

When you became the target, there is little you could do, the power difference is obvious
/r/MensRights14/08/22 10:50 PM
17

Very well said Even in Johnny's case, its still an uphill battle for him that took years. He is also rich that could afford prolong legal battle, and with a steady fanbase. Don't forget, its the "female" supporter's voice that affected the tide the most. Most of us don't have that kind of luxury, our social influence had been diminished solely because of our gender.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 10:48 PM
6

I agree, I don't believe it has anything to do with biology (I'm anti-biological determinism), its more of the result of conditioning. When something is rewarded it bond to happen more frequently
/r/MensRights14/08/22 10:42 PM
4

Underrated comment, very well said, this is especially true in less developed country. Another note, when life hits bottom, women typically have more option than men do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/22 08:22 AM
1

I bet you their typical response will be "But it happens way less from a woman!"
/r/MensRights06/08/22 07:10 PM
1

Again. Not fucking comparing. I am using it as an EXAMPLE as to how women suffer when you say women DONT suffer. Are you making stuff up? How in the world does "we suffer in different area, and in certain area men do suffer more than women, downplaying these area equals to show indifference to those that suffer" equals to women don't suffer? You haven't realized what you have here is typical "competition mentality" which you endorsed not to, This explains why you started bringing up all the nons…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:50 PM
1

It can’t be compared. Said from someone comparing multiple wife to conscription You see, this is the exact hypocrisy I dislike about your group, you claim to be something, but in reality you are entirely different than what you claim to be. Your logic fallacy is insane, I said "we suffer in different area, and in certain area men do suffer more than women, downplaying these area equals to show indifference to those that suffer, thus I bring up the conscription example", But you immediately downp…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:30 PM
1

I’m not a feminist actually. I’m a humanitarian. And again you bring up the US as being a big male conscripting country. Yes. They do. And it’s sad and it shouldn’t be allowed. Yes. There are other countries that only conscript men. But if you actually did your research you would see countries, many countries, where BOTH genders are conscripted, or where there is NO conscription. It’s not a lie to feed an agenda. It’s pure facts. You rely heavily on the US being a male conscripting country, but …
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:05 PM
1

Most countries that have mandatory military system conscript solely male, stop your lies, you are downplaying the military service burden of male all around the world. Just look at large scale war such as WWII, tell me how many women are forced to go to battlefield compare to men? Even in U.S selective service are only mandatory for male. What does certain middle eastern country allowing multiple wives have to do with the point I made? Did I just said "certain area"? Does saying middle eastern c…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 04:21 PM
5

Its pointless to play semantics. You knew full well what I meant, how about "Men were WAY MORE LIKELY held accountable for lying" and "Women lying are WAY MORE LIKELY justified and rewarded" If you want proof, the entire family court system is built on rewarding Women lying. The entire Metoo movement is build on rewarding lying, how is "believe women" not encourage lying? If you believe any group or individual unconditionally, how is that not a system that rewards lying?
/r/MensRights06/08/22 04:06 PM
1

But in certain area we do suffer more, that is a reality, in those area, maintain this neutrality attitude is showing indifference to those that suffers. Men do suffer way more than women in certain area, that is a fact. By stating this doesn't automatically negate that women could suffer more in other area. One of the primary example is conscription for men all around the world, tell me how does men and women suffer equally in terms of conscription?
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:58 PM
1

Underrated comment, this is so powerful!
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:54 PM
4

All human lies, but the difference is the reaction In our society men were always held accountable for lying, but women lying are justified and rewarded When a behavior is rewarded, it will happen in large scale. This trait has nothing to do with biology, its reinforced by the society. We were born equal, our difference came from our social construct.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:07 PM
3

The phrase Witch hunt is the perfect analogy for this issue. Accusing men of rape now has the same effect as accusing someone a Witch in medieval
/r/MensRights03/08/22 07:10 AM
1

The world is crumbling because men are not getting the reward they deserved, in fact they get shit on for what they've accomplished, not because men need to be shackled with more responsibility. And since its "responsibility" for men, whatever men accomplish people are less thankful because it their "responsibility", you see what you are getting at here?
/r/MensRights03/08/22 07:07 AM
3

ATS_WTF OP · 2 min. ago But it is a responsibility. Even when men didn’t agree with it they were forced to stay on the boat when it sank because it was their responsibility to save the women and children because that was all that mattered. You begin to sound like the person here in this video You just proved trad-cons are anti-male
/r/MensRights03/08/22 07:01 AM
4

Like I've said, I'm not against what you are saying about men being remarkable, because men are, what I'm against is labeling these accomplishment as responsibility (And I've told you my reasons as well). I will say it the third time: Men are remarkable without the need to be responsible for anything, they are remarkable simply because they choose to do remarkable things, that's it. I think we could at least agree with the last note here
/r/MensRights03/08/22 06:53 AM
5

This is the exact analogy I'm against Like I've said I agree with some of your thought, but this responsibility thing is what I'm against. Saying someone has the responsibility to do XYZ meaning they are mandatory to do so, if they choose not to meaning they are not fulfilling their requirements, which usually comes with some form of punishment or discrimination even if its just shaming (It could be much worse than that). On the other side, give cheers to them for fulfilling "responsibility" als…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 06:36 AM
10

Keyword: sex marketplace manipulation
/r/MensRights03/08/22 05:12 AM
6

I think I made myself pretty clear
/r/MensRights03/08/22 05:03 AM
14

I agree with some of your point, yes men are remarkable but: For it is men who built the titanic and when it sank it was the women and children who were saved while the men went down with the ship. Because they were men and that was their responsibility. For what it means to be a man is to put other before yourself. Regardless if they want your appreciation. Because it is men who build this world and it is men who continue to support women. I can't give it a pass to this male disposability tradc…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 04:55 AM
6

This is a stupid analogy. When you build something, there is minority of chance that it doesn't work, if you combine all the ship that actually worked into the statistic, the ones that didn't work fall under acceptable defect rate. On the other hand, Can you prove to me how is the defect rate going to be if all the ships were manufactured by women? You can't because there are none even made. People that does not contribute should not criticize people that do, its not about gender, its about comm…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 04:51 AM
10

When something that has all the benefit but none of the consequence, how is it going to be rare?
/r/MensRights03/08/22 04:44 AM
8

Its funny when she mentioned the word duty, I'm kind of curious what her duty is as a human being
/r/MensRights03/08/22 04:26 AM
9

They could be egalitarian, tradcon or feminist at the same time, because they don't have their ideology, they shift to what ever ideology that benefits them. Its just Egoism.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 04:12 AM
16

There will only be equality when a man could say the same thing back to her with the same level of acceptance from the society This women pretty much sum up the entire TwoX sub Actually I take it back, TwoX is even worse She also just reaffirmed marriage is a scam for men all along, not just when feminism started. Its the biggest false advertisement in human history, they use buzz words such as true happiness to brainwash us since we are still boys, make it seems marriage is our only purpose and…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 04:04 AM
2

This comment is underrated
/r/MensRights01/08/22 12:33 PM
31

You could get banned from that sub just for saying something like "Not all men are monsters"
/r/MensRights31/07/22 04:41 PM
1

We need this in every school that has women's study to convey a different message, at least the wishful think part of me wish it was true
/r/MensRights31/07/22 03:41 PM
76

Reddit will always be a misandric platform as long as TwoX is still the default sub There is absolutely no redeeming quality for that sorry excuse of a community, they are not even Feminists, they are Femitheists
/r/MensRights31/07/22 03:26 PM
2

I'm not pedestralizing anyone, if we want a society that address men's problem, who are more fitting to be president than people like her or Warren Farrell?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 03:02 PM
3

Banning them will only justify them silencing us The last thing we want is: "You see? MRAs doesn't give a damn about free speech too, they only care if the narrative suits them"
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:58 PM
11

Yeah, but even in this analogy women are not a minority group nor men are the majority, the total population is around 50/50
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:47 PM
11

Absolutely, the way they convey statistic is undeniably biased too
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:26 PM
4

This is the mother every boy needs I would gladly vote her for President too
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:22 PM
2

Hi, thank you for understanding my point, I know its a lengthy and wordy read, thanks for the patient! Curious, OP, what are your thoughts on operationalizing this? In a political sense, I'm still thinking how to convincing men to start creating this environment, the main road block is that traditional value is still too strong within the male population. Especially with influential tradcon male figure such Jordan Peterson mocking men for not being men enough to take traditional gender role (It …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/22 08:44 AM
5

In men's right community we do, but do you think we are the majority? I'm talking about men outside of our community. Most "blue-pilled"(I use this term just for convenience) men which are the majority, shows absolutely no compassion towards other men. Most men shows more compassion towards women or even dog than their own kind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/22 01:39 AM
5

Hi, I'm the OP of that similar post. What we need to do is to create an environment, where men accepting other men for being emotional, showing compassion towards each other, once men feel its safe to open up, they will do it on their own. This is different than forcing them to open-up(which is what the feminists does), but instead we create the environment first. Of course if an individual decide to be stoic, its also their freedom, but he should never impose or even shame other men for not com…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/22 12:19 AM
2

You are twisting my points, quoting me out of context, from your reply, it seems you have not understand a fraction of what I've said, or you did it on purpose, I don't know. But it seems any further conversation is a waste of time, Its impossible for me to answer you since what your understanding of my statement is wrong, but when I try to correct you, the correction itself is again misunderstood. You've claim you understood just disagreeing, but I have absolutely no idea what are you even disa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/22 10:54 PM
2

You misunderstood my point And yes, society, including men are clearly imposing other men to be stoic, tough, and other type of gender stereotype, we are talking in circles. If they are not imposing (men consist of 50% of the population, and trust me typical men in the society actual don't care about men's issue, they have viewpoint that are harmful to men, men's right community is the minority not the norm, aside from our community, those "blue pilled" men which is the majority are also respons…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/22 07:28 PM
2

Stoicism is a protective barrier that saves men from getting emotionally hurt by a judgmental Society, if you can't get a readout of my emotions, you can't hurt me. Yes, but that is a temporary solution, and this solution itself have its side effect. We should strive to create a society where men shall no longer need to protect themselves from it, and this start with not impose stoicism on each other. Choose to be stoic yourself is different than imposing it on the other. I'm not saying you shou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/22 01:15 PM
3

I'm not taking the word from them, I take a male perspective, and from my own observation, and the points I'm trying to make are different from them. By the way, I do not like that sub one bit
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/22 01:03 PM
3

Yes And this kind of mechanism could work within the group Its like in the past women use to shame women for not following the gender role too, like dress inappropriately, being unfaithful to the family, being a sex worker etc. its just that the rise of feminism awaken them from it. However men are still shaming men for not being stoic, not men enough, not brave enough, or simply just mocking other men for their suffer, etc. this needs to end. If we look closely its a human psychology thing, its…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/22 10:03 AM
9

That's more the reason we should support each other, instead of letting traditional value shackle ourselves. Since we can't expect feminist to show compassion, we as men should show compassion to other men being vulnerable, instead of expecting them to be stoic. For example we should stop calling other men being whinny and man up when they are show vulnerability.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/22 05:40 AM
3

I don't see your point contradicts with mine. What I'm saying is: Men should first accept other men being vulnerable and show kindness and compassion, instead of expect them to be stoic. Since we can't expect women to do it, we should start with ourselves. The saddest thing is men calling other men being whinny when they show emotion, its bad enough that women don't like men being vulnerable, we however shall show support.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/22 05:35 AM
2

I agree with you on this, as I've stated in my post, I agree with the idea, since the result do benefit men, but their motive however, is another story.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/22 02:56 PM
2

By evolutionary, I meant the ability of men to cooperate, to work together as a group to hunt more effectively and bring home larger game, thus ensuring that the entire tribe would prosper. No need to sugar coat it, men have been expected or even forced to participate in dangerous job or participate in war because they are disposable from the dawn of human civilization, not because they are capable, if you are talking about a more primitive time, men even the old and weak are sent to war as fodd…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:08 PM
2

I'm not assuming you are argue against my original point. But I AM against values that enforce traditional gender role of men in a cultural sense. These are the root of the problem, value such as stoicism is bad for men because they create harmful expectation from men, it also results in overall dehumanization of men, just like how we are now. We could always agree to disagree, but my stance is clear, stoicism that solely forced upon men needs to die, it creates inequality. Just like you wouldn'…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:04 PM
2

Yes, we are human being, we should be allowed to show every type of emotion, especially "vulnerability" which is what the society despise the most out of men.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 11:57 AM
1

The only reason for that is men cannot give birth, thus are expected to be disposable in a traditional society, where population represents power of a nation. The suppress of emotion make it easier to dehumanize men, just look at the livestock example I gave in my original post. If a group of people (let say men) that are emotional, drawing empathy and support from the society, you will find it harder for society to accept them (men) dying. This is why whenever disaster happens, media report wom…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 11:44 AM
1

By evolutionary, you mean the inability to give childbirth, thus making men's life less valuable? Men are expected to behave this way is for dehumanization purpose, men criticize other men for this are those who fall into this trap unconsciously because that's how we are taught. You can't free men from male disposability but at the same time preserve traditional value. The suppress of emotion make it easier to dehumanize men, just look at the livestock example I gave in my original post. If a gr…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 11:41 AM
1

Exactly, they change their name solely to cover their asses, just like them saying "They care about men too", which we all know in reality its a blatant lie, We wouldn't exist in the first place, if they actually do care about men.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 03:58 AM
9

The problem lies with how the word "abuse" is defined Right now, the most used definition really just became "solely based on the feeling of the receiving end", that means if she subjectively feels you are abusing, then you are abusing. This is how ridiculous it had become, Feminist and their gender study basically hijacking psychological terms that are still debatable within its own field and make it the absolute to fit their own agenda If you search carefully on google scholar, you will find t…
/r/MensRights15/05/22 03:28 AM
3

I think punishment against perjury should be a thing
/r/MensRights05/05/22 08:46 PM
77

They are payed to make false testimony as witness against people they have never even met, shame on these people, the witch hunt against men is real Not every men is as rich as Johnny Depp that could afford a good lawyer, imaging all the innocent men that are destroyed by this evil industry, this psychologist alone did 100+ payed testimonies and making money off teaching women how to lie in the court
/r/MensRights04/05/22 11:41 PM
1

Spot on
/r/MensRights03/05/22 03:06 PM
1

Good thought
/r/MensRights03/05/22 03:04 PM
1

So your friend stayed in Jail for 48 hours, lost his property for nothing. What about his fame? Is he being called an abuser by the neighbor or relatives? Did he clear his name at least?
/r/MensRights03/05/22 04:36 AM
2

Isn't not getting into relationship at all an even better option?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 05:56 PM
2

This kind of evidence is impractical, this could only happen if the man was lucky. You would have to have a habit of setting up surveillance all over your house You would have to anticipate your partner's betrayal She could always harm herself outside of your surveillance If you are expecting this and always prepare to record things, its not a healthy relationship, if so why get into relationship in the first place? To ask this type of prove is ridiculous, the rule should be whoever accuse who h…
/r/MensRights02/05/22 12:38 PM
21

So basically if you choose to marry as a man, than you are at the complete mercy of your spouse, am I correct?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 03:55 AM
4

You shouldn't blame yourself for that, you are the victim in this situation, her being toxic is her responsibility alone. The legal system was suppose to protect people like you, not helping the abuser, this is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:35 AM
3

How did such a flawed system created in the first place? This "restraining order" you've mentioned seems easily exploitable, does it really do any good than harm to its citizens? If you received a restraining order, could you even go back to take your property at least? Or do you lose access to your property right too?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:11 AM
10

I'm totally speechless. So what if the gender is reversed? Would they believe the man?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:04 AM
14

I can't stop wondering, if thing were this bad for men, why would men in the west would even want to marry? It seems to me, it make no sense to enter marriage
/r/MensRights02/05/22 01:55 AM
12

Thanks for sharing all the detailed. I would like to add, Let say if the process goes reverse, if a man is the accuser in this case, will the same thing happens to the woman?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 01:52 AM
35

So what would happen if you don't have the video? Shouldn't the burden of prove falls to the accuser? Picture alone does not prove you did it, it only proves she had bruise, and it could have been caused by anyone, including herself, courts in the west doesn't even have common logic?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 01:19 AM
20

Maybe you could grow a fucking sack and stop being afraid of girls and pretending you're under attack by them. First of all I didn't ask to be born with "sacks", the choice wasn't mine, sometimes I wonder if I could chose not to be born with "sacks", things might be easier for me. Second, If anything to be "afraid" of, its the system not the player
/r/MensRights02/05/22 12:16 AM
26

I would assume domestic violence against men are mostly unpunished.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 12:04 AM
18

My goodness, that is so messed up. Which country did that take place?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 12:00 AM
8

So in a jury system, if public opinion buys into feminist agenda of "men are the perpetrator stereotype", does that means men are screwed? Isn't it likely to turn into a "who gets more empathy" type of war, Instead of relying on hard evidence as how law was suppose to be? I'm a bit lost.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 11:55 PM
17

I can totally understand you. We as men most of time have no one to talk to, the isolation could make any trauma even worse, sometime we just gave in to the abuser
/r/MensRights01/05/22 11:51 PM
7

I'm waiting too, I could get an answer faster if I post in a legal related subreddit, but I chose not to, most subs have bias against men, I rather ask it here, at least I could expect a sincere reply
/r/MensRights01/05/22 11:44 PM
43

Good to hear you are recovering, I think as men, we should think twice before we enter marriage
/r/MensRights01/05/22 11:42 PM
131

That's insane, this psychiatrist should be fired. You were the one that's attempting suicide, shouldn't the psychiatrist trying to help you instead?
/r/MensRights01/05/22 11:29 PM
8

If a woman is accused of a crime, then all men are still criminals for making a horrible society where women have to commit crime, let's spend tax money (earned by men) and make program for that so she doesn't go to Jail.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:57 PM
6

That explains why in China women are treated like Goddess
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:55 PM
32

Good, in return give us men-only working environment, we don't want work place witch-hunt
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:50 PM
1

Conservative and Feminist are different form of Gynocentrists
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:47 PM
81

Because Gynocentrism comes first
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:45 PM
8

Do you mean racist is not ok, but some how sexist is?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:45 PM
0

Tell that to selective service or conscription
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:39 PM
28

They want men to look disposable, pretty people looks too valuable to be disposed. Not only the military, that's how traditional society works, make men look ugly, cheap, undervalued, emotionless with so called "masculine" doctrine, they do all these just to dehumanizing men so when men are sacrificed, the society is going react fine. Imaging if men in general do make ups, looking beautiful, emotion sensitive, graceful and elegant, how are society going to react if thousands of them dies? As an …
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:24 PM
2

This is how it suppose to have been in every false accusation case. Intentionally lying to the justice system is worse than any crime including rape, not only to the victim, but also makes the entire justice system looks bad. The dignity of legal authority is in question, nobody will ever take the legal system serious anymore if the false accuser could just walk away free every time, and the falsely charged victim gets sentenced for nothing. By the way if the gender is reversed is systematic man…
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:17 PM
17

Its different, they way men pees (which stands in the open), having women around is very awkward, I can't even concentrate when there is female janitor around. If its toilet with a door closed, that's a different story, which is how women's room works
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:12 PM
39

Can anyone from UK tell me why is UK more anti-male than any other place in the world? (I'm not saying other place is not anti-male) I swear, I could see misandric news or article posting in this sub about UK on a daily basis I really feel bad for you guys living there
/r/MensRights08/04/22 11:13 PM
2

The only way to cut off all support is to not marry (or not even in a relationship at all because of stuff like common law marriage) and not having child Although you would still have to pay taxes, but without marriage and having child, the state would be forced to negotiate with men's group as a whole But what I said above is idealistic, in reality however, to not have relationship to most men are unbearable, human have the innate instinct for intercourse. And feminist knew this, that's why the…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 10:46 PM
24

Its horrible
/r/MensRights02/04/22 11:42 PM
2

2) Feminism is a collectivist movement which tends to go hand-in-hand with socialist/communist/Marxist ideals of revolution and state ownership. She just nailed it with this statement alone.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 10:30 PM
4

The very existence of that sub is the proof reddit is controlled by sexist, by defaulting a misandric sub to new users. Imaging the other way around.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 10:27 PM
1

I'm not from U.S, but this seems reasonable to me
/r/MensRights02/04/22 10:11 PM
5

Men having stronger ego than women is a made up concept. However, men are forced to not show weakness and emotion is true, but that is not ego. You can't look at those Karens (no offense to people with the same name) and tell me they don't have excessive ego.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 09:57 PM
0

The video was taken down.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 09:42 PM
201

Prison: Locking up women does not work, charity warns I could argue the same for men. A spokesman said: "Since we launched our female offender strategy the number entering the criminal justice system has fallen by almost a third. "We are investing tens of millions into community services like drug rehabilitation and women's centres, and our joint Women's Justice Blueprint in Wales is diverting women away from crime." Why aren't these resources giving to men and boys? And by tens of millions, whe…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 09:41 PM
6

Well, there you have it, they are giving you counter arguments. They are not restricting you to think what you want to think, in the same vein that you can't restrict them from making their counter argument to your statement.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 09:36 PM
3

I would give love to both men and women, and I hope women could do that too, we could all love each other.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 09:32 PM
4

Provide sex? Isn't both party benefit from the sex? Same goes for the children, its not the men's child, but both. And on top of these baseline, women are not expected of anything right now. However men are constantly shamed for not be able to provide, especially by conservatives and feminists alike. While women are constantly being told its okay to no play her gender role. Heck men are not even allow to show weakness and emotions. Countless Public reaction test have been done in the past, socie…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 09:29 PM
7

freedom of expression does not mean protection from counter argument
/r/MensRights02/04/22 09:25 PM
3

Stay in School Don't do drugs Do not get married I fixed it for you.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 09:01 PM
1

Honey badgers are rare
/r/MensRights18/03/22 08:51 PM
7

Hmm, we have to shave our beard, what [Insert color] tax should you call that?
/r/MensRights18/03/22 08:50 PM
4

ATMs don't need love nor respect
/r/MensRights18/03/22 08:46 PM
5

They don't care because not enough people are making the voice.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 08:42 PM
2

She did not made a good point If divorce happen due to abuse, women gets to keep most of the property, there is also alimony and child support(which in most case aren't used for the child), she also gets the custody of the child and brainwash the child by saying bad shit about the father. She would only be making a good point if none of what I've said existed. If you ever see a single mother with more than five kids, she probably exploit countless men and the system by falsely claiming abuse, th…
/r/MensRights18/03/22 08:18 PM
2

Financial abuse is men saying no to women's entitlement to their property According to the law voted by the feminists
/r/MensRights18/03/22 08:07 PM
5

If someone gave me the choice to have a partner that would pay all my bills, keep me safe, give me a home, get me food, and make sure I’m loved, all for the simple price of house chores, I’d kill. I’d literally kill for that. You know how they define male privilege? Let me give you a reality check. When you think of male privileges you are associating yourself or other normal male citizen, which are the privilege of a slave. But when most women think of male privileges, they are thinking the top…
/r/MensRights18/03/22 07:43 PM
110

I don't even want a women to play traditional role in exchange for mine. The traditional gender role for men are way worse. One favor feminist actually offered to men is that they've made men waking up, realizing how oppressed men actually were even in a traditional society. Tradcon is no better than feminist. Staying in the kitchen is nothing compare to how harsh and cruel men's gender role were. After taste of gender role free, I can't never go back to the traditional gender role of men that a…
/r/MensRights18/03/22 07:23 PM
4

If she says no, just leave. If she says no, but calls you afterwards, watch out for manipulation, this is where the shithole begins. If you are not careful, the rest of your life could be ruined.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 07:15 PM
1

If its contrary to its interest, she could refuse, how simple is that? Feminist makes sex so special that somehow consenting in sex is so different than consenting to any other thing on earth. And the population is so brainwashed by their doctrine even in this sub people don't see the logic fallacy behind it. The only reason I could think of the real intention behind they designing these doctrine this way is to aim specifically to stereotypical male behavior. Be it sex drive or gender role, male…
/r/MensRights18/03/22 04:24 AM
5

"For every laugh, somewhere a tear is shed"
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:22 PM
1

It is a negotiation, she has the right to disagree, there no coercion, not agreeing simply meaning she would not receive the offer he is giving. He is not abuse his authority "over her", he has the authority over his own house. That workplace example is different, because the employer is exploiting the employee's labor, it was a labor contract, the employer is not allowed to fire someone for something that is not written in the contract. To put it simple, employee offer labor, employer could onl…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 09:25 AM
2

ignoring what I was saying and talking in circles This is exactly what your doing right now, you haven't answered anything from my previous thread. You are the one that is talking in circle without addressing anything I've said. You could claim you've won, its your freedom, if winning was all you cared. Edit: If you want to play words An expression of an intention to inflict pain, harm, or punishment. No one is inflicting pain, harm, nor punishment here. And punishment is not always wrong, an em…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 03:44 AM
2

You take my word out of context on purpose, if you want to phrase me, phrase my entire statement. Something that I repeatedly stated, you ignore them on purpose. If keep on mention "laws" but only partial of law that you nitpicked for your narrative. Asking someone to leave his property is not wrong doing. The owner had the right to cancel her tenant-ship, the 30 day limit is for the time of her packing her stuff. If she refuse to to leaving within 30 days, he have the right to call authority to…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 03:31 AM
3

In this case her own disability to make her own house is responsible for her homelessness, her boyfriend owes her nothing. He is simply not offering his property. What do you mean by Tenant right? The owner of the house have to right to ask a tenant to leave, even if it requires 30 days Talking about echo chamber, you are the one interested in your bandit mentality of entitlement to other people's property and freedom. This is not coercion, nor forced sex, she has the choice to not agree, and th…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 03:10 AM
2

Its not a threat if he has the right to take what is his, I think you are the one that does not understand what a "threat" means "A will pay B 500 dollar for punching B's face, B will not receive the money if B does not let A" is that a threat/coercion or an agreement? Did A coerced B for physical assault in this cause? B have the right to disagree, but he can't just claim A is coercing him for withhold that 500 dollar. Even if let say the 500 dollar is essential for B's survival, will that chan…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 03:01 AM
2

What did he take? His own house and his own freedom to be with someone else? When something belong to one person to begin with, its called not offering. Unless you think his girlfriend are entitled to his freedom and property?
/r/MensRights17/03/22 02:31 AM
2

"if you don't meet my demand, don't expect me to offer you what you demands" This is my original statement, you are rephrasing them to something different. And "or else" what? if or else I wouldn't offering you something, that is not a threat, people have right not to offer things
/r/MensRights17/03/22 02:21 AM
2

Boss firing employee in this case is abusing authority, the company are held in different standard compare to individual freedom, and they have labor contract. After the contract is signed the company have obligation to the employee. As individual, we have the right to not offer something, which in that Quora case is the right to freedom (being with someone else), right to property (making one leave)
/r/MensRights17/03/22 02:19 AM
1

How is it wouldn't stand in court "making someone leave" doesn't imply he will use illegal means, its just a verbal expression, are you saying that he have to say the word "I will evict you"? The owner of a house have the right to ask someone to leave, its common sense, even if you want to make that strict 30 days period claim, he still have the right to do so. They are in a relationship, how is that trading goods? In this is case the relationship is not working out for them, are you saying she …
/r/MensRights17/03/22 02:17 AM
1

But in this case, she is not a renter. Even if that's true, its still not a coercion if he give her the time. Claiming "I will make you leave" does not mean he is literally "kicking" her out.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 01:19 AM
1

Can you bring me the source of your claim?
/r/MensRights17/03/22 01:10 AM
2

Thanks for understanding, I was never implying coercion is the right thing to do, In fact I think its illegal. But the problem is how coercion is defined that troubles me. For example if you choose not to offer something in your free will, its not a threat, its simply a disagreement.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:56 AM
1

She doesn't get it, there is no eviction, since they are not landlord-tenant relationship, there is not contract, she is allowed to enter his house due to his free will, he have the right to withdraw that permission anytime. There is another troll here that went even farther and claim entitlement to that men's property and freedom Not offering something (in this case his house) is not a threat, but a disagreement, a free choice.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:53 AM
1

Its not an eviction, there is no landlord-tenant relationship between them. He simply allowed her to enter his house out of his own will, he could withdraw that permission anytime.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:51 AM
2

In that breakup or house case, Its not coercion, because he is not doing anything wrong to her. He is simply not offering something that which he had the right to. Thus its "if you don't meet my demand, don't expect me to offer you what you demands"
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:40 AM
3

The problem is how to define coercion, you don't just claim coercion and it automatically became true. Not offering something is not coercion, I don't know your case, but for the example I've stated in my post, its not coercion.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:37 AM
2

I guess if you live in U.S that might be the most logical thing for an individual to do consider how their law are designed specifically for targeting stereotypical behavior of men by feminist in order to maximize their gain. The problem I have here, is that I do not agree with their definition of "coercion", it sounds to me like an idea build upon the concept of entitlement. Where in most case women are entitled to a men's property and personal freedom even if they are not married.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:31 PM
1

Are you one of the FDS trolls? I've answered your question multiple time, but every time I've answered your question, you completely ignores them and rephrasing my word, isn't it a language trap for wanting me to admit something you've made up? While at the same time you've answered none of mine, you've dodged everything question I've asked you. If anything, I would assume you are the one from FDS? Maybe you are the one that should stop ignore my answer, just as you did in the first place for no…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 07:25 PM
1

What do you mean leverage over ones life? She has the leverage over her own life for not working her way to not being homeless, he doesn't You are making false language trap here. So in your logical, by not giving someone money to live is leveraging over his life? Not giving money and not giving house is the same thing here.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 07:23 PM
1

Murder is of course coercion, any violence or illegal act could be consider coercion, but in this case its neither. You again are confusing, in a free market, if one deal if far worse than the other deal, the people have the right to not agreeing with that deal. He is not responsible for her homlessness, because he does not have the obligation to do so, its same as not saving someone's life. It sounds to me, she is not coerced by him, but coerced by her desire and greed for free housing and not …
/r/MensRights16/03/22 07:18 PM
1

Not saving someone is not murdering, you are mixing difference concept. Thus there is no forcing to begin with. If you don't offer me something don't expect me to offer you something, its an agreement, a fair trade. Saving life is an offering, by not offering does not mean murder. your logical fallacy is insane.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 07:11 PM
1

He is not obligated to offer her the term of living, by agreeing her entering the house does not automatically makes him having the obligation for her terms of living. Again its not a threat because that is his freedom to not wanting someone in his house, its a disagreement, disagreement is not coercion. For your last example is ridiculous, because you can't end another person's life, ending a person's life you are infringing his right to live. But however if you refuse to save that person, that…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 07:07 PM
2

No its not, because that is his house, making someone leave your own house is by definition "not give something", because you are not requirement to give him a place to live. How is that different from not giving someone money? Are you saying just because you lend someone money in the past, you have to keep lending him in the future? Do you mean just because you allow something before, you are obligated to allow it in the future? He had the right to make her leave, he is not the one causing harm…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:58 PM
1

So this is how you define harmful? If someone ask you for money which he needs to survive, by not giving him money is harmful to his life, that makes you committing a harmful act? He does not owe her anything, homeless itself might be harmful, but that harm is not caused by him because he does not have the obligation to do so, if anything its her own responsibility for homelessness.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:54 PM
1

That's his house, how is that coercion, you haven't read anything I've said. There is no danger or any illegal activity, she might not like the result, but "not liking something" is not coercion. Kicking out of the house is his property right. There is a different between "not offering something" and "threat" "If I don't offer you something that you demand, you have the right to not offering me something that I demand" But claim the latter, its not a threat nor coercion, its a disagreement Quora…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:51 PM
3

You definitely haven't read anything I've said. Coercion should be illegal, but not everything counts as coercion The one thing you've mentioned that is worth consider is 15 years old, which is underrated aged, unless her boyfriend is also underaged, if an adult is trying to have sex with underaged person, that is a crime in many country.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:45 PM
3

I think you should at least try to read what I said in my post, the problem here is how they define coercion -------------------------------------- Edit: Since you've blocked me for not being able to backup your own argument, I'll just state my last reply to your last post here: Hahahahhahahahaha ok yeah there's no way you aren't a troll. I asked a question once and you didn't answer then claimed you answered it multiple times? Go back to Female Dating Strategy and atop trying to troll this sub.…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:43 PM
2

But feeling is subjective, just because someone feel something does mean its true. If feeling is the determine factor here, this is like saying if someone felt she will get rape, then it automatically makes other person rapist, this is even worst than witch hunting. I don't understand this notion of the law has to protect "feeling".
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:42 PM
1

Exactly. I think they went to far of redefining the meaning of words, such as "coercion"
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:38 PM
1

You've remind me that there is a convention is South Korea, that asking more than 3 time = rape So, do you agree that number of time asking is the determine factor here? The cup example is for layout the characteristic nature of the argument not the quantitatives.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:35 PM
7

This I totally I agree, this man might seems like an asshole in a moral perspective, but that is not rape. Because coercion is build upon threat, a threat should at least comes with some type of danger. danger does not equals to "disliking the result" Simply by pressuring someone with a statement of "the result they will not like" does not mean its a threat, because there is no danger or other type of illegal activities at play. he/she is free to choose to leave, the only thing that is coercing …
/r/MensRights16/03/22 11:47 AM
3

I see, but do you think the way U.S define rape is a bit of problematic too? How do you differentiate the real rapist (in a more stereotypical sense) from the "rapist" of their definition of rape?
/r/MensRights16/03/22 11:20 AM
1

I see, but if a landlord file a evict on the behave of the renter not paying rent, wouldn't you think he will likely being granted the permission to evict? Since for dating, there is no law managing this, so shouldn't they both be treated as a free person which neither is obligated to do anything for the other? Yes house is important to one's lively hood just as you've mentioned, so is money. If a someone demand you gave him your money or else he will shame you for being a terrible person, does …
/r/MensRights16/03/22 11:18 AM
1

You have a point, but the landlord could kick you out (or evicted a more formal word) for not paying rent right? The person in question does not have the obligation of providing a house for another person for free, unless they reached an agreement, which in this case they don't. I've read your other replies, I think it may all came down to how sex is treated specially in society.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 11:00 AM
2

You have a point, but have you every wonder why sex is consider so special even to the point it out weights freedom, property, or even sometime life itself?
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:59 AM
8

I think they don't care for men, I begin to have this sense that these law were specifically designed to aim for men's sex drive (In a stereotypical sense). your case was an after thought by them if they thought it at all that is. But I think it would be interesting, if you just agree, and sue her afterwards for coercion, I would love to see feminist response to this type of case, the very same law they are pushing against men.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:46 AM
6

Exactly, some people think "renegotiating = coercion"
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:02 AM
3

Look, I agree with your statement in a practical sense, since I wouldn't want to having sex with someone who does not want it. But you've missed the point of my entire thread. I'm not complicating this, my original thread was discussing the reasoning behind the term coercion in a legal sense, which I think is completely ridiculous. Imaging someone was sent to jail just because he said "if you don't do this, then don't expect me to do that".
/r/MensRights16/03/22 09:53 AM
3

In one of them you're just making a decision for yourself and in the other you're trying to make the other person have sex with you against their will... How am I trying to make (or do you mean force) other person by stating my terms? How is "if you don't do this, then don't expect me to do that" a coercion I'm not discussing that at all. This is only about making someone have sex against their will. But isn't this the exact thing that makes her reconsider? Since the "rape" could only be establi…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 09:39 AM
2

"ok, I'll find someone else" "do it anyway or else" To the receiving end, what is the fundamental difference between the two statement other then on a surface level one sounds nicer? Kick them out is much worse for obvious reasons Do you think one person is obligated to have his property right to be owned by another just because they are in a relationship? The moment someone tells you they don't want to have sex with you, the right response is to move on, not to try to make them do it anyway. Ho…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 09:19 AM
8

So are you saying you will just leave without at least trying? I respect that. But that doesn't prove trying to initial an agreement a coercion. Because she have the freedom to choose, its not like I'm threating her with violence or other illegal means (such as abuse authority, disclose private information etc), instead I'm making legit claims within my personal freedom. For example you are selling me a cup for $10, I think the price is too high, I declined, then you told me this is the last of …
/r/MensRights16/03/22 09:05 AM
5

Are you saying before having sex one cannot make an agreement/contract with the other? I'm not saying relationship itself is a contract, but within the relationship could one not be able to initiate any agreement? I still don't understand how is "if you don't do that, then don't expect me to do this" a coercion. Its like saying "expecting me to do this" is an obligation instead of my choice. I do not have the right to access to her/his body, same as she/he does not have right to access to my fre…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:49 AM
3

If you don't do this I will do that.... Isn't it how all contract or agreement was made? On the opposite, if you don't do this, then don't expect me to do that, isn't it a fair exchange? I would like to hear you elaborate on your opinion
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:45 AM
5

Which example are you referring? Is the "finding someone else" or "kick her out of his house"
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:41 AM
4

"I'll fire you if you don't eat my pussy," Good point. In this case, I think she is abusing authority, since its a company, its different from personal freedom. A company have a lot of obligation (at least in the current system) that is uncommon for any individual. And "eating pussy" does not included in the contract either. However in terms of that sex example, we are actually in the middle of making the contract (albeit verbally)
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:35 AM
4

I edited my reply, I apology for not making it clear. For example, I'll sell you a cup for 10$, you disagree. Then I told you "if you do not buy it I'll sell it to someone else", so you agree to that for not wanting to lose the access to this cup, does that make me coercing?
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:28 AM
5

Can I ask the reason behind your opinion? "illegal to pressure someone into sex, even using threats that are completely within your legal rights to make?" I think if one party is looking for sex in a relationship, the other one however is not, than does the former have the right to make an agreement to the latter? Like "If you don't want to go to movie with me, I'll find someone else", "If we do not share same hobby, I'll find another friend". In these example I'm also pressuring, but you wouldn…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:18 AM
5

What is your opinion on these law itself? Regardless of which state that implement them. Do you think its fair?
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:13 AM
8

Imaging a 60 years old man, without any training, contribute most of his life time paying taxes to the society, supporting his family, and now he can't even retire and was forced to be sent to meat grinder. Even cattle have better fate than this, at least they are anaesthetized before slaughtered. Sadly this is the fate of men, not only lower than women, but also lower than dog, cat, and even cattles The Ukrainian authority is no better than their enemy, they lose all my respect.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:05 AM
2

Of course, they are called honey badger for a reason.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:03 AM
7

The majority of self pro-claimed feminists in situation like this are completely silent. Yes, there will always be minority who actually do care about men's life, but its the exception not the rule If you don't believe try to check some of the sub such as TwoX, these people there that claim to be feminist will disagree with you
/r/MensRights07/03/22 02:58 AM
17

Whoever calling this propaganda is complete bullshit, we do not support government of either Russia or Ukraine, we support the innocent men that was forced into slavery on both side! Men's life matters!
/r/MensRights07/03/22 02:55 AM
2

Its not so profitable for those who are forced to die as tools.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/22 03:27 PM
3

So do you agree, in a non feminist society, male disposability and forced gender role is ok?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/22 01:39 PM
7

Misandry at its finest
/r/MensRights01/03/22 07:51 AM
5

You need more people than just from this sub for that petition.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 09:10 PM
3

Survival for whom? Are you kidding me? 90% of men dying? Who's surviving? The women? How about turn thing other way around and I'll call it survival.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 09:04 PM
2

Feminist ≠ Women Women could work together with men's right, hence they are called "Female MRA" or "Honey Badger" However, for feminist to work with MRA that's a different story, if you look closely into the fundamental theory of feminism, much of it are anti-male
/r/MensRights27/02/22 07:35 PM
6

No, there is no collective "one country", the claim "Ukraine is defending itself" is a vague term. Its the 90% lower class male fighting for the rich politician on both side. They are forced to be put into meat grinders! "There are people coming to Ukraine to kill Ukrainians" This statement is totally BS, if so then the best way to not allow that happen is to let the Ukrainian citizen leave! Those who are captured, slave or not, they should at least have the choice! In fact the moment they are d…
/r/MensRights27/02/22 09:24 AM
10

If our priority is to save the men that was trapped in Ukraine there are 3 things we should do. Encourage neighbor country to open border for men as well Urge Ukrainian government to lift the ban immediately, or else we will stop aiding them with supply We should find a way to punish/warning the Russia government for started this atrocity without hurting their citizen as much as possible. And lastly, I pray that Putin burns in hell.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 12:16 AM
45

If Ukrainian government banning man from age 16 to 60 to leave and not allowing them to use ATM to withdrawing their own money, what difference does it make comparing to the Russian government? 90% of men's live are more important than a small group of rich politicians! Most of these people does not have any proper training, imaging sending a 55 years old men without any knowledge of battle, its basically meat grinder! Do you guys even have souls? Imaging if your sons, brothers, fathers, grandfa…
/r/MensRights27/02/22 12:00 AM
13

They don't fail to realize, those hypocrites did it on purpose. They will shift their stance when in time of war.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 11:25 PM
10

Hence its called "Feminist Buffet" for a reason. They choose what right they want, when they want it, and what responsibility they don't want.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 11:24 PM
0

I'm asking in the most extreme case. Even if in the case it will fall, what is your solution?
/r/MensRights26/02/22 06:40 PM
2

I fully understand your perspective, that was mine too, for me male all around the world are victim not the enemy. But what if their government force them to fight and we have to face them in our defense?
/r/MensRights26/02/22 05:31 PM
9

We as men did not choose to be born in the first place, what duty do we have?
/r/MensRights26/02/22 04:47 PM
21

The entire human history is a history of male disposability. Men needs to wake up, I truly hope there in one day a nation is built from the ground up by a pro male government, I know its wishful thinking.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 11:31 AM
11

Are the majority of male's live more valuable or the government more valuable? I'm not a Ukrainian, I can't speak for you guys. But for me, I would say if a country see male as disposable, this country is not worth the male citizen to defend, plain and simple. To the one that involuntarily forced to die, the economy doesn't matter to them. Who cares about the country then who fight for it, simple as that, if the politician want war, they could fight their own war. If a hypothetical nation is bui…
/r/MensRights26/02/22 11:20 AM
8

To the one that are forced to die, there is no difference. Actually even worst, unless the Russian is committing genocide, the only thing that is lost are the government, the life of the citizen is more important than the government. From the Russian side, its all the same, authoritarian conscripts men to fight their war. No matter they win or lose, the male citizen always lose.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 08:31 PM
1

I respect your personal experience and opinion. In that case, serving in the army will not do you any favor, fight for rich politician is no way to protect the one we love.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 04:10 PM
8

I would love so, but guess what, when it comes to draft, only biological sex matters, even in U.S, just look at the selective service website of your country.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 03:09 PM
7

The moment you are drafted, you lose your freedom. Its not enemy you are killing, its the same disposable men as you that you are killing. Most likely you probably wouldn't be the one that's killing at all, you will be just sent as a fodder to where ever they wish you to be, and get killed by someone that had the same mentality as you on the other side.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 03:05 PM
7

First I'm not American Second my government gave me nothing, we are the one that is contributing, if the rich politician want war, they could fight the war themselves. All the conscript promotion are the same, they sugar coated as "defending the country" how about tell that to all the conscripts in Russia that believe in this none sense and is now invading Ukraine, how does that look like "defending" to you? War are just lower class male dying for the rich politician, period, there is nothing to…
/r/MensRights25/02/22 02:52 PM
11

You are a coward for not standing up to slavery
/r/MensRights25/02/22 02:47 PM
10

The title of the post literally said male only conscription, and by definition women should not have to right to vote on male only conscription.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 09:33 AM
4

If we can all say no to conscription in every country, there will be peace, simply because there will not be enough men power to launch invasion. For those Russian lower class male that was conscripted to invade Ukraine, they are also the victim. War is lower class male dying for the rich politician. Conscription is slavery, no amount of excuse will justify it. If politician wants war, or who ever voted war, they are the only one that should be required to fight.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 09:30 AM
6

I think its dumb to compare giving birth to kill or be killed, its not even the same magnitude, with today's technology women are rarely in danger when giving birth compare to the past, while war is still the same, men that go to war does not receive the same care and love that women receive from giving baby either. Again I'm not saying women should be drafted, I'm saying draft is slavery across the board, it should be abolished. For those women who voted a male only conscription, they should be…
/r/MensRights25/02/22 09:26 AM
11

Lower class men die for rich politician. There is no country
/r/MensRights25/02/22 08:17 AM
9

Involuntary military service = Slavery, the most worst form of slavery A government that enslave its people is no better than the invader, to the people that is forced to kill or die, there is no difference to them.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 08:15 AM
33

A country that does not care about men, are not worth for men to fight for. I was cheering for Ukraine when Russian attacked. Now I'm not so sure. Its just another meaningless war that lower class male have to die for the rich politician.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 08:01 AM
3

By family do you mean wife or children? When is the last time men are appreciated for doing these things? Imaging a WW II veteran sacrifice so much only to be called oppressors by the feminist. Or getting divorce rapped by his wife that he protected, and can't never see the very child he protected. No more this "family" lies, men should be free. Even if men are appreciated, people should have the right to choose their gender role. Only because women are praised for bearing children does not mean…
/r/MensRights25/02/22 07:36 AM
2

Yes, I'm proud of defending myself from slavery, anything wrong with that claim?
/r/MensRights25/02/22 03:47 AM
2

In time of war, If you refuse to kill or be killed as a male, you are sent to military prison camp for 5 years where you are doing forced labor, and even if the 5 years expired and you are out, if you refuse again, you are sent there again. And being shamed a draft dodger for life. While Women could just comfortably stay in the safe and bragging about how brave they are. And yet people still saying there is no systematic sexism towards male? Even if things went south, when country at crisis capa…
/r/MensRights25/02/22 03:37 AM
13

At this point, there is no reason for any of us to fight anymore. If a war ever breaks out, and if I need to be drafted, the only courage I will every need is the courage to say no. Draft is the most worst form of slavery, its not just forced labor, but forced to die, for a meaningless war for the country that doesn't even care about us.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 07:57 PM
2

Any government that encourage conscription is a authoritarian that supports slavery, the only courage I will ever need, is to say no to that bullshit. You are the one that need therapy or maybe you are the one that should go fight and die for that authoritarian that you so loved about. And no I'm neither right nor left, I'm libertarian, I don't need validation from your bullshit philosophy
/r/MensRights24/02/22 07:45 PM
4

You and your "borders" could go to hell, I serve no one but me, and I die only for myself, proudly! You are the coward that can't even stand for yourself to the authoritarian! Draft is slavery, and the most worst form of slavery, period!
/r/MensRights24/02/22 07:39 PM
45

This world sucks for a man When the country is in peace, you are called a rapist, misogynist, and suffer disadvantage compare to women across every spectrum in the society When the country is under attack, you are force to kill or be killed to defend the very country that hates you and use you as fodder, although I'm not a Russian or Ukrainian, but imaging if you are one of these people that are conscripted to fight a meaningless war. All that changes if you a birthed with X+X chromosomes, in a …
/r/MensRights24/02/22 07:33 PM
10

Exactly, no political spectrum is pro men. We need our own.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 07:03 PM
3

Will men in Ukraine be able to cross border as refugees?
/r/MensRights24/02/22 06:53 PM
5

Serve what country? A country that despise us and use us as fodder?
/r/MensRights24/02/22 06:52 PM
3

Discord is also controlled by big tech, they ban MRA related channel as well, although not as frequent as other platform, its that not they don't want to, but due to the nature of Discord itself which is difficult to manage all the content. We really need something like Mgtow-tv, but for MRA
/r/MensRights04/02/22 08:13 AM
2

Now I can't be sure any more, US had slowly shifting towards to authoritarian with rampant censorship
/r/MensRights31/01/22 10:42 AM
2

What's going on? Welcome to 4th wave feminism.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 10:36 AM
12

That woman was convicted of nothing from what I know
/r/MensRights30/01/22 08:00 PM
3

God bless Men in India, if there is one.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 03:13 PM
22

Can you even imaging how many years of sentence and backlash from the societies would be if the gender was reversed?
/r/MensRights30/01/22 03:10 PM
11

Its difficult to find example that matches all criteria, often time, men that suffer from mental illness in a crime are denied from investigation of mental health background due to public outcries, I've seen many example before, that why you rarely see mental diagnosis was published if the suspect was male.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 02:57 PM
1

I feel it all the time, I often have the thought of suicide. Its this community that sustain my depression.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 02:18 PM
2

When Woman doesn't want sex within marriage, it's "Sex does not mean love, you only want to use me as a doll" When Man doesn't want sex within marriage, it's "He doesn't love you"
/r/MensRights30/01/22 02:13 PM
4

They are not libertarian anymore when something is pro-male The entire society is anti-male The only pro-male groups are either censored or de-platformed, this is how gynocentrism works. Libertarian, the group that supports freedom of speech the most start wielding censorship hammer when it's about gender related issue tell you something. In the current status, you could debate anything else but gender, its like in medieval the only thing you can't question is God, like in Soviet Union the only …
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:19 AM
17

Basically the entire system encourages them to be this way, since they will not be held accountable for anything, why act differently. And yet they still claim there is systematic discrimination against them while men are held accountable for everything, even things that are out of our ability.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:04 AM
4

I second this
/r/MensRights23/01/22 10:51 PM
2

Abuse does not have to be physical, your mother is emotional abusive And now you've mentioned your father, you are living under abusive parenthood
/r/MensRights23/01/22 10:34 PM
1

I think your mother could be one of the contributing factor to your problem. My mother was the same when I was younger than your age (still a minor), 99% of the time if I ever tell her something, she suddenly became competitive of who suffers more. Even when I'm seriously ill and need to go to hospital, she would brush aside and claim her illness out of nowhere. My entire childhood basically lives in doubt, I've always thought I was the problem, until I realize one day, she is just an abusive pa…
/r/MensRights23/01/22 10:20 PM
10

Nobody owning apology to something they did not do, in order to have someone feel guilty of something they did not do is to assert the equivalents. In this case, other men did it = you did it, that is gaslighting. Gaslighting also includes instill doubt, uncertainty and confusing
/r/MensRights23/01/22 09:50 PM
9

And that is the exact same to make someone feel guilty of something that they did not do
/r/MensRights23/01/22 09:45 PM
4

More than 33% male suicide rate in India is under the "Family issues" category. I've also heard that in India, Wife could file divorce if the husband refuse to have sex. Talking about double standard.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 09:25 PM
5

Call police! I'm getting arrested!
/r/MensRights23/01/22 09:09 PM
9

I would never donate to Wikipedia ever again after know this, thank you
/r/MensRights23/01/22 08:36 PM
46

You shouldn't, nor should you feel bad about yourself for being a man. Those that make you doubt yourself by gaslighting you to think otherwise are just pure misandrist.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 08:21 PM
2

According to feminism theory, whichever nation abolishes patriarchy are in result the most prosperous. But the reality is, whichever nation that's already prosperous are the only ones that would have the resources to play along with feminist's game, most second and third world country can't even afford it. If you were to make a metaphor with kids, that second and third world country are like the normal and poor family, the first world country are that rich family, feminists are that rich and spo…
/r/MensRights23/01/22 07:54 PM
23

Shit-testing is a important display of dis-trust or even manipulation Never be with someone that does not trust and manipulate you, so dump her.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 07:48 PM
14

I knew there was something fishy in the recent year, thanks for point out the culprit. Gender studies really are just gender war propaganda agency.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 07:05 PM
4

The best way is to give comparison if the gender is reversed, double standard is more difficult to nitpick than straight examples. I'll give you a casual one: In most western Movie/TVs, there was a recurring trope portraying drunken(or on drugs) men goes home and beat his wife for no reasons, just to later get white knighted in the next scene. This trope is a horrible way of depicting men in general, because in reality statistic shows domestic feud is rarely one sided and most dispute was actual…
/r/MensRights23/01/22 05:56 PM
2

What kind of savage is this, in year 2022?
/r/MensRights23/01/22 05:53 PM
4

There is also the factor of reward here. If finding a partner is very important to you, then your risk tolerance could be higher. Each individual is different, but as a individual myself, I could only represent my own preference. To me the risk is way too high, and it will only be getting worst, at least in the short term. There is reason behind why men that prefer staying single is increasing.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 12:28 PM
2

I personally have good female friends as well (I actually prefer sharing my feeling with them more than my male friends), from my experience, the best advice I could give you is that women often (not always) treat men differently when they became intimate (there is a lot of psychological reason behind it, I'm not gonna get into detail here). Everything is cool if you keep the friend zone with them. But again, its your personal preference, just understand that in the current system, when getting …
/r/MensRights23/01/22 11:54 AM
4

Do what you like, it's a personal preference. For me, the current system is unfair towards men, basically you are at the mercy of your partner. if you think you've met someone that you could trust her enough to put your safety and future at her hands, go ahead and do it. Just understand what you get yourself into beforehand, and also understand that the same person could change her personality overtime.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 11:42 AM
-1

At this point all I could suggest is to not get involve in relationships, until the meta changes.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 08:29 AM
5

This is fucking ludicrous. This just shows the current morality system are complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 08:20 AM
14

Let me tell you one of the main reason. Men usually don't see the Category "Men" as their group identity, where women are the complete opposite. Instead men sees things like "culture" "nation" "hobby" "ideology" or basically anything else as their group identities. For example if you make a racist speech, the men in that race that you are discriminating against will give you backlash to the eleven, while the women belong to that race would comparably cares less. Or even as trivial as hobby, have…
/r/MensRights23/01/22 07:55 AM
3

Thank you for your kind words, its people like you that I actually have hope for this world again. For a woman to support men's issue takes a lot of courage, and there nothing to gain, not even fame, people that support men's issue often gets bad press. You truly have my thank. As to my friend I will talk to her, she is a very nice person, one that I trust enough IRL to reveal that I'm a MRA which I rarely have the courage to do so.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 01:42 PM
9

I understand what you mean, that's why like I've stated there is nothing wrong stating fact about feminists. It's just that I wish we could figure a way to avoid directing at the wrong person. If that person identified as feminist mind his/her own business, its fine with me, but if they are misandrist, that's not ok. And by giving women privilege at the expense of men, that's the misandrist type of feminist. But people like Cassie Jaye, they are those feminists that actually do care about men, c…
/r/MensRights22/01/22 04:07 AM
2

What misandrist often lies about our community is by depicting us as a community solely bashing feminists, so maybe if we actually use the word misandrist, then we are not bashing feminists, because that is what we actually meant in the first place. And by claim we dislike misandry as a men, I assume even feminists couldn't disagree with that argument.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 03:21 AM
5

I see the problem now. You see, I've been browsing through multiple sub reddit, and start seeing that in our community, people do often make the mistake of addressing the wrong term. My goal is trying to point it out. Its difficult for me to point out something without using the word to point it out. For example I still see many people when in a heat of a debate, do making mistake of using the word "women"(of course I can't blame them, when his adversary is far worst) , in order to point it out,…
/r/MensRights22/01/22 03:07 AM
14

You misunderstood what I meant, I literally said we should not. The word Enemy here is a metaphoric term, just like how I describe Chess and how I describes collateral damage. Sometimes its hard to articulate a concept without metaphor, I'm trying my best here. And believe or not, it doesn't matter what wording do we use, misandrist will just claim whatever they feel like it. By saying misandrist are the enemy of men, I really don't know how much better I could do with the wording.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:42 AM
26

The concept of oppression, is a fuel used to leverage more demand, its the oldest tactics in the book. In a way they actually wish for more perceived oppression, by either faking statistic, or change the definition of oppression itself.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:25 AM
7

Hmm I wonder had many red flag this fellow woman had...
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:18 PM
6

No matter how much shit Mainstream media is giving to him, Paul had remain it's stance all these years, a great mentor he is, wish him a good life after leaving.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 02:27 PM
2

In their logic, if you ever claim the men are victim, then its victim blaming, victim could only be women.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 09:05 AM
8

Exactly that. Forcing male gender role just because of female choice is unethical.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 06:06 AM
29

That pretty much sums up that god awful sub
/r/MensRights21/01/22 05:34 AM
11

The beauty about men's rights movement is that no matter which culture you are from, or which political spectrum you are from, we could all come to understanding. Korean men had done a astonishing job, respect to them.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 04:54 AM
45

Although I'm not Indian, but as far as I know, Indian men basically suffer from the worst of both world. On one side they are forced to fulfill tradition gender role that is detrimental to male (in a way worst scale compare to western counterpart), on the other side they are oppressed by feminists which is increasingly influenced by western propaganda. I truly wish Indian men the best luck, and live through this anti-male age. The suicide rate for male had skyrocketed in India, and the most cont…
/r/MensRights21/01/22 04:50 AM
10

Everything goes shitstorm if the gender is reversed Basically she think women are entitled to men's genital, so yeah women are affected. Its identical in a sense if a slave dies, the slave master is also affected. So the slave master actually "CARES" about the slave. For some reason, some women Nowaday had this entitlement mindset and they don't even realize it, this just show how fucked up our systems are. Caring without respect is not caring. Before one claim she cares about men, first try to …
/r/MensRights21/01/22 04:04 AM
3

Does that mean in Spain hiring Female worker is a huge risk for the boss? They would surely backfire for women's employment ratio isn't it not?
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:47 AM
6

Do you mean in Spain the law is officially written like that? How on earth is that even legit? God help Spanish men.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:45 AM
24

How am I expressing dislike for a subreddit, being label hateful against women? What is the logic?
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:28 AM
44

First of all, I can't read it, the site needs membership. Second you call an article basically an author expressing his/her opinion statistics?
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:26 AM
37

Homeless, Suicide, Hostile working environment, War Casualties, Violent Crime Victims, Empathy Gap Tell me which category are women more oppressed than men? Give me statistics. By the way, Korean men are forced to do military services while women do not. Feminist lies about history as much as they lie about everything else. For example If feminists complain so much about men takes the majorities in STEM field, then why most women choose to go to gender study instead? Its not like law forbid wome…
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:11 AM
15

It wasn't always like that, The tone has shifted dramatically after leftist took control. Hate trump as much as you like, but at least he is the lesser of two evil when it cames to censorship. Few years ago, when you search MGTOW or MRA on urban dictionary, most explanation are positive. But try search these word now.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:08 AM
50

If you are not interested in Men's problem why even bother coming here? Isn't what you are doing now "bashing men venting their problem"?
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:05 AM
42

I assume that you created this throwaway account to specifically express your hatred towards men, am I correct? How is Men's right in Korea male supremacist when all they do is to apply the Feminist logic back to them? Do you automatically implying that Feminists are Female Supremacists?
/r/MensRights21/01/22 02:58 AM
58

I assume that you created this throwaway account to specifically express your hatred towards men, am I correct? And no, I don't hate women, I hate Female Supremacist, where they are so entitled to privilege that equality seems like oppression to them.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 02:57 AM
318

God I hate TwoX subreddit
/r/MensRights21/01/22 02:45 AM
1

Like what I'm always been saying, Patriarchy is no ally to men China is a country controlled by Tradcon
/r/MensRights20/01/22 12:57 PM
2

It kind of depend on which country you live in, I believe in Asia, most likely you are going to work over time. Especially in Japan, China, India
/r/MensRights20/01/22 12:55 PM
12

Imaging how many years, if the gender is reversed. Not to mention prison environment is way worst for male.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 05:02 AM
23

Men's problem are mostly ignored, and we are not doing ourselves a favor either. Instead of saying "Men could get his butt touched too!" There are more serious problem that men in general are facing. Compare to all the other category of problem we are facing, sex harassment is just Tuesday. Homeless, Suicide, Hostile working environment, War Casualties, Violent Crime Victims, Misandry, Social Disadvantage ((you are unlikely to gain attention and assistance compare to women)), Empathy Gap, Moral …
/r/MensRights20/01/22 04:47 AM
4

Exactly, and feminist made up another word for this, called "victim blaming", if you ever tried to justify the man's reaction
/r/MensRights20/01/22 04:22 AM
4

Exactly, we as a species did not evolve by submitting to the rule of nature, or else we'd still live like Ape by now.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 07:48 AM
7

When it comes to Male, the "protect the weak" principle is suddenly throw out of the window.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 06:20 AM
5

Any claim that is based on survey, you should take it with a grain of salt. Survey could only reflect opinion not reality, and sometime it even fail at that, because people might anwser differently than how they actually feel. Even if they are honest, their subconcious might be different from what they believe. A more reliable method is double blind test in a more consistant enviroment, with long term period of observation, but even this cannot guarenteed absolute reliability. In current status,…
/r/MensRights14/01/22 05:50 AM
1

Do you think it alleviate the crime?
/r/MensRights14/01/22 05:41 AM
0

Thats why I believe all these chaos are driven on a scale of political struggle, like how communists and capitalist did in the last century, the whole world is changing. I do not think It happens soley to screw up lower class male, we are more like collateral damage. Its just that this Anti-male propaganda profit the current groups with vested interests the most. Its like this victim hierarchy, who has the loudest voice of claiming victimhood, who(and those that supports them) in return gain mor…
/r/MensRights14/01/22 05:18 AM
7

The magnitude are different, but they are identical in a sense its about political battle, that's my point You don't see any other crime over emphasized like this. Because there is no political motivation behind it. But there is no statistic proof that sex crime happens more often than other crime. And sex crime are often only emphasized as male perpetrator and female victim, because there would be no motivation to go other way around. Imaging if in hypothetical future, when most politician are …
/r/MensRights13/01/22 09:32 AM
1

The real problem is, outside of this community, typical men had little empathy for other men but on the other hand these men had empathy only for women
/r/MensRights12/01/22 07:12 PM
5

I'm with you all the way. For some reason US politician figured out its best to control people through identity politic, instead of addressing people as individuals, they love to put people into different group and play good cop and bad cop. Everytime when they want support, they just shift the hammer.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 08:22 AM
10

You are a very nice person, I'm sorry if you are offended, we really don't have any control over what people in the community might act. But on my personal behalf, you have my full respect. Your occupation is your own privacy, and it has nothing to do with your stance. And Job shaming is rude. Thank you for being empathetic with Men's issue.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 07:53 AM
7

We really don't have any control over what some people within a community behave, but I don't think MRM in its core principle had any association with misogyny.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 07:47 AM
7

Thank you for your support Any woman that would care about men's issue to me are very empathetic human being, because they have nothing to gain from it, not even fame, thank you very much I believe feminist now is a tool for political interest its no longer for supporting its citizen For example, feminist does not care about Woman vs Woman discrimination, the female victim in these cases are ignored. I believe the soley purpose of feminist is too instill disonance among its citizens, let the low…
/r/MensRights09/01/22 07:17 AM
6

How do you think society will generally react to the following scenario? Man hit a Man Woman hit a Woman Woman hit a Man Man hit a Woman Although a human being hitting another human being is not good, but why people reaction differently towards different gender combination? Its called stigma. As for your point, although It's not right to hit another person even if that person drive you mad, but however if feminist is about equality, why they never defend Male vs Male victim, or Female vs Female …
/r/MensRights09/01/22 06:12 AM
22

So SPLC is the real male supremacist?
/r/MensRights09/01/22 02:33 AM
30

Thanks for your support I can't speak for anyone else, but at least for myself I don't feel in anyway my gender is superior to female, on the contrary I admire female, the ability to give birth is some thing I cannot do. To be identify as a male supremacist is one of the most offensive thing to me.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 01:54 AM
2

I agree with reforming law and upvoted your post. However this is an egg and chicken situation, without the numbers, it would never happen, in order to gain the number you first have to figure a way out in current situation, which is to cope with the shitty laws.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 09:11 PM
7

Yes, I'm fully aware of this self-censorship coping mechanism to survive under feminist pressure. But it also has it's merit, the only reason our sub is still alive on reddit is thanks to that. But this is a double edged sword, it's beneficial in short term, but damaging in long term. We will eventually get shut down no matter what we do, it's just a matter of time, we are already on the hit list of many different organizations. What is important is how we use this time we bought with our coping…
/r/MensRights07/12/21 10:02 PM
2

This whole women do not need to be held accountable is the key aspect I dislike about feminists. No matter what right they are fighting for, as long as they held equal amount of accountability, I'm fine. But apparently, not only they do not encourage more accountability, they are fighting to reduce it. If they want more right than men, they should held more accountability than men, or else they are just elitists and supremacists, and more fitting: Extortionist
/r/MensRights23/09/21 06:15 AM
4

Resentment is a normal human emotion (just like mildness), it's a reactionary emotion. Feminist loves to portraying resentfulness in a negative light to empower their social engineering agenda, don't give in to them. It's a type of guilt tripping and gas-lighting, and victim blaming. Instead of being remorse of being resentful, ask a better question, what is the cause of resentfulness, a reactionary emotion could only happen if someone is being wrongfully treated in the first place. Peasant in D…
/r/MensRights10/09/21 02:44 PM
8

You cannot, they made sure they have to hire female. Feminist always think few step ahead.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 02:34 PM
10

Even consent does not work, because she could just state she only consent for the specific time when she sign the paper, and does not consent after 10 minute of sex, which the rape happened at 10:01. This is how ridiculous they are. Imaging any other type of contract working in this manner, the world could be in Chaos. e.g. I only agree the 1 million dollar agreement during the time of signing the contract, but I didn't not agree 10 minute later.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 02:27 PM
30

male abuse victims are just male abusers who are trying to victimize their victims by painting them as abusers. Isn't the opposite true? How female victim are just female abusers who are trying to victimize their victims by painting them as abusers. Husband getting sued for domestic violence, in reality because the Wife had an affair and trying to take all his asset and alimony.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 02:23 PM
9

Good point. When feminist plays the "hate" card, we have to realized, "hate" is a reactionary emotion. Instead of criticizing "hate", we should always look deep into what cause the "hate". Imaging if feminist actually care about men (which could never happen), there will be love instead of hate.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 02:16 PM
2

You have my support
/r/MensRights10/09/21 02:13 PM
2

Same kind of history repeated in the Crypto scene right now, in the last Crypto cycle people are very excited about the new technology, seeing Crypto is the future of financial freedom. And look at what is happening now? The government all around the world are trying to regulated it or straight banning it. In the not distant future, Crypto could also be used against the people. Politician does not give a two cents about potential, all they care are power and control.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 02:10 PM
3

I remember back in the early 2000s people are excited about the new internet technologies, praise it as a gateway to freedom, where finally people will have their voice without the interference of government. At that time I was very skeptical of this view, because technology is neutral, It could benefit people, but it could also be used against the people, and this is what's happening to us now.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 01:54 PM
4

Social engineering is the dystopia future we are in right now. Masses are easily manipulated.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 01:40 PM
2

No perjury is charged again. If one does not take an oath for her testimony, than her testimony should not count as evidence.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 01:36 PM
81

Feminist love to take a sub-set of successful men as example for all gender issue, while disregarding 99% of the male population
/r/MensRights10/09/21 01:31 PM
2

This is how legal system in India works?
/r/MensRights03/09/21 09:28 AM
2

The even more sad truth is, feminism is actually created to divide men and women, so the population would be busy fighting each other, instead of stand together and demand better treatment from the government, this in-fight between People is already happening. In the end, only the Elites benefit from it, a very smart move.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 07:57 PM
2

What they do is, they ban everything that is related to "pain free", if we can't bear our life anymore, we would want to just quit the game. The only thing that stops us is human natural response to "fear of pain" (not death itself), if you try to search the internet, you wil find most pain free method is banned, without the knowledge, we will force ourself to live a painful life and keep paying taxes, and this is exactly what they want. Assisted Suicide is actually not hard to performance ourse…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 07:48 PM
2

Exactly, children belong to the state anyways (compulsory education, aka brainwashing, you do not have the right to teach your own child), They don't care about men or women, they just want more population to produce GDPs, or getting drafted and serve them. Some policy seems pro-male on paper, but in reality its all for the benefit of goverment. And trust me, we don't even have the right to our life either, they ban everything suicide related too. Righttodie exist for a reason. I might sounded l…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 07:33 PM
2

I totally get your point, radfem use whatever they can to bolster their numbers
/r/MensRights02/09/21 07:26 PM
4

Draft itself is a violation of human right. Making women suffer does not hide the truth of it.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 06:31 PM
3

Witness is not reliable in these type of case anymore, after all these years of propaganda by the feminists, the biased against men is societal. Most of false accusation happened because the law enforcer rely solely on witness.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 06:28 PM
10

I don't understand how this will benefit men, this will only benefit the government.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 06:25 PM
2

Sadly, I'm cis, It would be awkward if my partner demand sex, but I will be total honest with him from the start. However, I do believe, the only one that could truly understand man emotionally is another man.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 06:18 PM
7

And let me guess, no perjury is charged. Remember that poor guy got 20 years in jail because of false rape accusation? Yeah, let's believe the women.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 06:01 PM
3

The most crazy part is, the police actually teach the women how to lie in the court, they even have experts helping her practice a few time. No matter which nation, feminism is evil, period. You may ask why? Because they need to get funded, its money on the line, talking about corruption.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 05:39 PM
6

Or she could make lies about Domestic Violence, or Martial Rape. No perjury will be charged even if she failed.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 05:01 PM
61

It's funny how they think a men can never judge a women because they have no idea of what being a women is like. But on the opposite side, apparently they love to get themselves involve in every decision regarding men's issue and call themselves experts.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 04:59 PM
12

Yeah, believe the women my ass, just created another victim
/r/MensRights02/09/21 04:56 PM
2

If we look at the bachelor tax previously, it was only enforced on men not women, the fun fact is, it actually created a career called "professional lady rejectors".
/r/MensRights02/09/21 04:43 PM
2

Yup, and Certainly not UK
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:25 PM
5

This just shows how desperate they really are. Instead why not they just make a better place for men to live in, and then men WILL pay the fund, apparently they hate win-wins.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:14 PM
7

Which Terfs tried extremely hard to seal that ability, by only allowing Female to Male trans, and restricting the other way around. They always outthink us every few step ahead.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:09 PM
8

Yes, so it would make more sense, with the political pressure, the western country will more likely to force it (population growth) to compete.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:01 PM
8

It's just hypothetical, we could change the variable here. Let's swap the word birthrate to funding, or welfare for women and children (since we all knew marriage is just a way for government to use your money to raise population for them, your child belong to the state anyways, they have the rights to brainwash your child through compulsory education, and if you try hard to "de-brainwash" your child, they simply tag you with emotion abuser. They also have the rights to force your child into sel…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:58 AM
22

Terfs are already trying to seal that route. They only protect Female to Male Trans, rejects and attacks the other way around.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:40 AM
3

Finally someone address this none sense, good job
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:17 AM
17

It's good advice, but it's that sad that men had to went through all these trouble just protect himself, and with the possibility of it not even work in the end.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:55 AM
4

No, because if it was a male gender, you two would probably already end up in a physical fight.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:42 AM
13

Men is forced to be the provider, 37 question answered. You may ask why? Because imaging if men's role is to stay at home with children, do you think all these 37 stituation would exist? would any men be in any of these group? If its women who is forced to fight and compete for resource, the story would be reversed. War, political, terrorism, crime, the incentives are almost always has to do with the distribution of resources, male's gender role are forced to participate in this game. Thats why …
/r/MensRights01/09/21 02:40 PM
3

Because there is funding on the line. All they care is money, feminism corruption.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 02:35 PM
14

The safest way is never get close to a women, Not only relationship, any contact could be dangerous, this type of thing could even happen if you hired a maid. I would hire a male maid over a female any day. And I would avoid female co-worker at all time. Men will always be at their mercy, we basically does not have any legal tool to defend ourselves. And guess what, my view fits their description of misogyny, how ridiculous is that. I don't hate them, I fear them. They wield immense power withou…
/r/MensRights31/08/21 09:22 PM
1

I'm not talking about political term, nor does term matter, and people usually does not take it as a political definition anyways My point is pretty clear, I don't think I need to repeat anything.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 09:18 PM
14

Wrong sub
/r/MensRights31/08/21 09:15 PM
23

Yes, Victimhood is also another intrinsic advantage, men could never play this card better than women
/r/MensRights31/08/21 09:12 PM
9

Afaik, women tend to mix a lot of different feeling into sex, money, protection, safety etc.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 07:24 PM
65

Intrinsic value is one of the best privilege women have.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 06:26 PM
18

Because Women live longer regardless
/r/MensRights31/08/21 06:16 PM
2

Child support is just a fancy name for "Steal all your money" I'll support my child with my own hand by living with him/her, not by some abusive mother only marry to use the child to steal properties that is not rightfully hers. It's proven fatherless child is accountable for majority of mental illness, money will not help the abusive mother to give proper eduction to the child.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 06:08 PM
2

Nice article, when women become more free with their gender role, the gap become even more obvious. Men's problem is neither biological nor societal alone, it's the product of ignorance by society that failed to account the biological attribute of male.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 05:43 PM
4

Thoughtcrime and free speech cannot co-exist. Hate just like love, is a human emotion, as long as its not call to action, hate itself should not be consider a crime. Although country like North Korea still embrace the idea of thoughtcrime. By the way, "kill all men" is a form of call to action, which is a crime by many country.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 05:29 PM
174

Why care about the society, when the society abandoned you first?
/r/MensRights31/08/21 05:21 PM
13

His view count had almost lost 90% compare to few years ago. Not because of the quality his content declined, but because of shadowban.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 05:11 PM
4

Its more complicated then just that. Men hating is the result of feminism's effect on younger generation, but it was never its intention. Its intention just like all the other type of political propaganda, power and privilege. But power and privilege does not come for free, every privilege they receive, on the other side of the spectrum there is an opposing side paying the price, and that is the current state of men. To state feminism is about men hating is an understatement, its never driven by…
/r/MensRights31/08/21 04:59 PM
27

At this point, why even bother marrying
/r/MensRights31/08/21 04:47 PM
2

In order to solve problem we have to first figure out a way to gather in numbers, nothing is accomplished without numbers. Tech company that's controlled by feminist will do anything to prevent us from gathering. They will censor you, shadowban you, or just straight ban you to kill any opposition in infant stage. Which we definitely need time to grow.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 03:52 PM
5

How dare you for not sacrificing your life for the good of women and children, you monster!
/r/MensRights31/08/21 02:31 PM
1

Treat the man the same as how you would treat a woman, then you are fine.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 12:17 PM
34

In the currently climate, its dangerous for a male to be around any female, period. The state had monopoly over violence, and somehow they decided to use that violence against male citizen with a simple call to action by female citizen. The only thing you can do now is to hide until this worldwide persecution phenomenon ends, sadly it probably wouldn't end within our lifespan.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 12:04 PM
307

Sadly you will hardly find any video created after 2020 with significant amount of views. They almost shadowbanned every pro-male related video.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 11:58 AM
5

Let me ask, do you pay attention and care to male biologically attribute the same degree as you payed attention and care to female biologically attribute?
/r/MensRights31/08/21 11:56 AM
1

Exactly, they were never intended to solve any problem, "Problem" are fuel to keep them running. For example they are the ones that rumbling about domestic violence (men to women) the most, yet they refuse to discuss the reason behind it, nor they wish to present any method of solving it. They just slap a sociopath or misogyny tab on to those people and be done with it, to further drive their propaganda. In reality there is a close relationship between domestic violence (men to women) and male s…
/r/MensRights30/08/21 05:57 PM
1

I see, thank you for your detailed explaination, it really helped!
/r/MensRights30/08/21 05:42 PM
1

Edit: A couple that has been in a Philippine live-in relationship for at least five years can get married without a marriage license. What does this mean? without license? Does this mean if one party wanted to marry, then they are automatically consider married without any paper? And i don't understand this "As husband and wife" definition, what count as husband and wife? Is kid the determine factor? what about if there was no kid, or if the kid was adopted?
/r/MensRights30/08/21 05:17 PM
15

where they were supposedly making a law for men to get home and not go out after 6pm. What law is this? That's absurd
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:59 PM
3

But, I can't take it anymore!
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:30 PM
4

And let me guess, no Perjury is charged
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:26 PM
4

Just imaging if the feminism theory is debunked in mainstream media, the entire gender study industry will collapse, all these so call professor would lose their job. Its in their interest that they can never allow that to happen.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:11 PM
5

Search "title IV-D corruption" , although its just the tip of the iceberg. There is an entire hidden industry behind feminism, a lot of people's interest relies on it. Here is another minor example.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:07 PM
4

Men hating is the result of feminism's effect on younger generation, but it was never its intention. Its intention just like all the other type of political propaganda, power and privilege. But power and privilege does not come for free, every privilege they receive, on the other side of the spectrum there is an opposing side paying the price, and that is the current state of men. To state feminism is about men hating is an understatement, its never driven by emotion, its driven by interest and …
/r/MensRights29/08/21 08:59 PM
1

You got my meaning completely reversed.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 08:51 PM
1

It helps the rise of Men's rights movement
/r/MensRights29/08/21 08:10 PM
17

The funny thing is Perjury is considered a crime and is punished by law in many country. But when the perjury is done to benefit women, guess what? At least out of all the news article regarding false accusation of men, not a single person is charged with perjury, when some of the testimonies are blatant lies. In many instance there are even hard evidence point out that people are lying in testimony, but no perjury was charged. I would assume in this case an evidence such as DNA check would not …
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:59 PM
314

Her period is her biological problem which has nothing to do with another individual. She kicked you is an assault. People laughed at you was a discrimination, and its a societal problem. Imaging if the case was reversed: A guy kicked the girl in the vagina, and people laughed at the girl and tell her to get over with it, because guy experiences spermatorrhea. What a wonderful world we lived in.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:49 PM
19

Another guilty until proven innocent case
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:46 PM
92

It's sad to see even in this sub, people are defending this double standard. Imaging if a woman had finished, and the guy is not, and if he wants to finish, that would consider rape by many people, and few people would consider that the revoke of consent, you see the double standard here? Not to mention biologically, male finish way faster than female (including other species too). Its a discrimination if the biology attribute of one party gets the care and attention, while the biology attribute…
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:35 PM
3

I would said few years ago, it could be effective. But with recent censorship and shadow banning, the effect had reduced significantly compared to few years ago. Feminists are afraid of this, they have to brute force censorship because they are not winning the debate.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:26 PM
5

Like I've said before, physically stronger is burden instead of any real advantage. At least in the perspective of society. You get all the accountability, and labors, and of course all the hate.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:23 PM
2

Feminism is not about hating Men, at least at their core principle, they do not. Feminism is about power and privilege, and with that goal in mind, it would inevitably discriminate against Men, because power and privilege does not come out of thin air, there is always a price to be paid, and guess who paid the price?
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:14 PM
55

And let me guess, he was sent to jail solely because of "witness testimony".
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:05 PM
2

And the elites controls everything, sadly
/r/MensRights29/08/21 12:17 AM
2

Hmm, i don't know much about the algorithm, does active members also count the readers?
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:43 PM
29

When it comes to accountability and paying bill, hell yeah biological dad counts. Rights? Nah.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:42 PM
2

Never wanna go to UK, extremely misandric
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:36 PM
2

I agree, something need to be done, criticize news article on a daily bases in our own space would not make any progress in the long run.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:30 PM
22

Yeah, we better too have another place other than reddit to gather if someday this sub went down. Big tech company all became misandric now.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:27 PM
11

I do believe one of the reason behind all these misandry throughout history is because traditionally male had always been seen as threat, while female had been seen as resources. Its not uncommon when a conqueror conquered a new land, he would have male population above a certain age be killed and leave the female and children alive. This mentality is very persistant even until today, all the male that had been killed in Afgan is an example. It's sad truth that from the perspective of human soci…
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:13 PM
7

Wait, even if the man is guilty, I never know murder could be justified other than self defense, this clearly is not, so lynch is legal if done by a woman?
/r/MensRights28/08/21 10:46 PM
1

I enjoyed Paul Elam's content back then, the quality of his channel has been declining in recent years, but finally a video worth watching
/r/MensRights25/08/21 07:40 PM
12

Search Title IV-D corruption
/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:26 PM
18

Nope, DV charges were never equal to begin with, it was design solely to give women a legal tool to destroy men, it all started with the battered women nonsense few decades ago. Because of politics and corruption
/r/MensRights24/08/21 09:28 PM
1

It's not, the difference you saw between Slave of Rome and us men today are offset by the technology advancement, not because of the hierarchy. Imaging if ancient Rome had modern technology and does not need to worry about resources, the life quality of their slave wouldn't be much far from us.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 07:18 PM
24

I do believe if you look closer, you would find that the relationship between Male and Female status in the society now is more resemblance to the Slave and Citizen class to ancient Rome in a way.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 09:04 AM
15

Haven't you notice? All the method of Male's way of force compliance you've mentioned had extreme social consequences, which makes all those method invalid. On other hand, Female could play some cards that is both socially effective, and completely risk free. For example, what could you possibly do to retaliate if your co-worker threaten you to comply with a sexual charge? Another example, what could you possibly do to retaliate if your wife threaten you to comply with a DV charge (by hitting he…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 08:57 AM
21

If You are only talking in the perspective of natural selection, than yes, in that narrow perspective female are more important. But human civilization is in a state that surpasses primitive needs. One of the good example is that our species is overpopulated compare to any other species, and our lifespan and the way we reproduce already defiled this natural selection. Our biological evolution had basically already came to a crawl when compare to any other species long time ago. You see, in natur…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 08:38 AM
3

Family courts are one of the biggest criminal organization.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 03:49 AM
12

And absolutely no evidence needed. It makes you wonder, why even marry anymore? Marriage has already becoming the biggest scam in human history. Imaging if you are doing business, and sign a contract. But the rules benefits the contract breaker, you lose your entire company and goes to jail if your partner is the one that breaks the contract. That would be ridiculous. To do this they created no fault divorce, specifically for this purpose. And then men gets smarter, how about cohabitate and not …
/r/MensRights20/08/21 03:49 AM
7

Yeah, believe the women!
/r/MensRights20/08/21 03:41 AM
16

Every time there is a rape charge, it's now becoming more of an instinct to be skeptical. It's a tool too easy to abuse and exploit. What better way to ruin some one with as little risk as framing him rape or DV? Just think about it if you hate someone and wants to ruin him what is the most risk-free way of doing it?
/r/MensRights20/08/21 03:38 AM
58

This is typical double standard, when it benefits them, they play the biology card. When it's the opposite, they play the equality card. As a result, the culture completely disregard the biology trait of male, and favors female.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 03:34 AM
2

Rape now has different meaning and standard when comparing women to men. At least in the context of women, they could basically justify anything as rape with narratives.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 03:31 AM
5

And people keep on saying woman are not good at teaming up, my ass.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 03:26 AM
13

Exactly, talking about propaganda war. Truth does not matter anymore, it all about the narrative, who is the better storyteller.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 03:21 AM
0

That's not how hate crime works, hate itself is not a crime, only if you have done something that's consider a felony but with the motivation of hate, could be considered hate crime, that Judge does not make sense. But again, family court are not even court to being with, itself is within a gray area of constitution, most family court does not even have recording.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 12:20 AM
1

Yes, and that too, the constant brainwashing through decades of course. These types of video just proves that we could never win by their game, this is how people reacted even seeing it with their own eyes. If even that doesn't work, how powerful could idle statistics be?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 11:17 PM
8

This is just another example of "tyranny of the victimhood". This is how feminist play their card. They knew how society unconsciously react to the biology difference between male and female. Human are driven by emotion not logic. Even if we can prove male could be the victim (not to mention in the video they literally sees it let along proving), it does not matter, pursuing equality in this area is just another example of playing by their rule. Its a battle they could never lose.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 11:10 PM
4

Wikipedia is not a source, everybody could edit it, this is just another case where men's problem completely gets ignored. You have Wikipedia page specifically talking about everything related to women for the past decade, before MRA states their side of the view, that's when Wikipedia start shown male side of things. To my experience, if women is treated poorly in certain regime, that means men suffer even more, I'm talking about the bottom class male which makes up 90% percent of male populati…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 10:57 PM
1

How is Taliban rule better for men? Stop presuming something you know nothing about
/r/MensRights19/08/21 10:53 PM
2

Why is this not pinned? or at least add to side bar.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 10:51 PM
6

Yet, any time there is chaos, men are always the ones that being forcibly conscripted and sent to meat grinder in the end. All the stories, protest, political bullshit before hand always lead to that. And privilege is even more obvious during bad time. If these media coverage gains the attention from authorities, let say if US responded, who do you think the authority will send to die? An army of woman?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 10:46 PM
1

Exactly. What I like to add is, certain terms were created intentionally and specifically targeting men through observation of social and biology behavior. Shifting focus and asking equal treatment within these field is already playing their game. There is no equality when one could only play a game the other created. For example, in modern year, it seems a lot of issue and discussion were circled around sexual behavior, such as rape, sex harassment. Even if men do get equal treatment in this ar…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:25 PM
2

Misandry is systematic, and across cultures, born a male is the most awful thing in modern day, you don't even have the freedom to let your voice be heard.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:18 PM
4

The first thing you should ask is: Do men even get the chance to tell a story? Every time there is chaos, such as war, disaster, etc. always the women telling stories, that's privilege.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:12 PM
2

This is "Systematic" discrimination against men
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:11 PM
2

Sent US feminist woman there to help them
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:09 PM
12

The judge fined you 3k because you provide evidence? Wtf? that doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:02 PM
13

This is nothing new, and it had started long ago, it's just Reddit's turn now You do these things in order Take control of all the mainstream information distribution platform (Google, Youtube, Reddit, Twitter, Fackbook etc.) Remove all the opposition information from these platform Spread propaganda and brainwash newer generation with these platform The newer generation vote for your group so you gain more power With more power, you could take control of more platform Repeat the cycle This is h…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 08:16 PM
384

This is how politic works nowaday. You do these things in order Take control of all the mainstream information distribution platform (Google, Youtube, Reddit, Twitter, Fackbook etc.) Remove all the opposition information from these platform Spread propaganda and brainwash newer generation with these platform The newer generation vote for your group so you gain more power With more power, you could take control of more platform Repeat the cycle This is Propaganda War
/r/MensRights05/08/21 08:09 PM
2

Finally some law enforcers did their job, praise to these cops
/r/MensRights05/08/21 08:00 PM
3

Just my personal opinion here. You can't completely rule out eye witness testimony in every other case as you've mentioned. But sex crime and dv cases have already been unofficially held in a different standard by the feminism movement. 100 people making things up about a person in a group that was hated by the society with multiple generation of brainwashing is not a large number, especially if the person in question is famous. Sex and dv cases that are specificially targeting men would never h…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 06:59 PM
5

It might not be all, but i'll name a few Male competition, this is a biology thing, male often see other male as threat subconciously, these apply to most animal species including human. Which has more effect on us especially the competition between male politician Male is biologically wired to empathy with female, this also happens to most species including human, thats why if the same harm was applied both to male and female, people subconciously empathy towards female more, this is why the em…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 01:32 PM
4

How about including male perspective into gender study class first?
/r/MensRights05/08/21 09:19 AM
5

He/She is phising for hateful comment so that reddit could ban this sub aswell, just don't fall for it
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:45 AM
7

Feminist = Sexist Prove me wrong, right here
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:32 AM
23

False accusation of Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault too squeeze his asset as his final value.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:13 AM
8

I've experienced this all the time aswell but there are still people think that female are bad at teaming up
/r/MensRights05/08/21 01:57 AM
6

Exactly, thats one of the major problem we face. But also do not ignore the biological ones. Its a numbers game after all
/r/MensRights05/08/21 01:42 AM
22

From what i know, feminist reject good looking and femeninty because they think it satisfy the need of men, as a example they shamed korean women's beauty standard for that. Justifying unattractiveness does themselve no favor.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 01:40 AM
2

I already addressed about multiple witness, please read again, thank you
/r/MensRights05/08/21 01:02 AM
3

I assume innocent until proven guilty, since testimony is unreliable in these type of cases, thus i assume innocent until there is other type of proof. No matter how difficult to get a reliable evidence, if the accussed is easily convicted by unreliable evidence, it sets bad example for future human rights. And certainly the false accusation most men facing today are the direct cause of this. This has nothing to do with about tearing women down, i just gave you an opposite example of witch hunti…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 12:46 AM
3

How in the world is restricting freedom of speech do this sub any favor?
/r/MensRights05/08/21 12:40 AM
8

Because its harder for men to team up and beat feminist in the numbers game for multiple reasons.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 12:38 AM
5

To be able to have basic human right
/r/MensRights05/08/21 12:35 AM
1

Because its another typical case where i can't find any evidence (at least i personally can't find any online, if anyone finds anything please let me know the link, thank you) other than "Victim's" word or so called testimony, so i gave him the benefit of doubt. At this point any case that involve tons of woman teaming up with testimony to prosecute a person and especially the beneficiary is another woman which is Kathy Hochul to replace him, will make the case even more suspicious. Not to sound…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 11:51 PM
66

Thats why we need decentralized alt platform
/r/MensRights03/08/21 09:03 PM
3

100% with you!
/r/MensRights03/08/21 06:22 PM
109

The same happens to r/mgtow2 now
/r/MensRights03/08/21 04:47 PM
1

What you said is the definition of different idealism, no one could Objectively define what an idea is, its just different opinion and views. You might not think a particular group deserve to be RP, thats fine, its your view. Even within the MRA, people have different version and definition of it. Tribalism sometime is the result of different idealism and views, the idealism is fine, but sometime its not the best idea to divide an already marginalized group. While i respect each idea and views, …
/r/MensRights03/08/21 04:03 PM
2

This is Gold
/r/MensRights03/08/21 10:36 AM
6

Thank you for your insight. We really need more people discussing this, the more brains, the better result we could achieve, I am still hopeful.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 10:10 AM
1

I'm not saying movement will break the barrier, on the contrary what I'm saying is we need to find a way to overcome or at least negate the effect of it to a certain degree for the movement to move forward.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 10:01 AM
1

Yes, and the worst part is, these are actually proven or surfaced false accusation, imaging all the false accusation that was wrongfully convicted and never even get to be defined as false accusation in the first place. Its frightening when you think about it. Most of surfaced false accusation actually involving the accuser confessing, because law enforcer's are less inclined to investigate toward clearing the name of the accused, since their job is prove guilty not to prove innocent, this behav…
/r/MensRights22/07/21 05:16 AM
1

This kinds of stuff is not rare, it happens more often than you think
/r/MensRights21/07/21 02:31 AM
16

As individual, let your voice be heard, this the best thing you could do for what you believed in
/r/MensRights23/06/21 01:41 PM
4

Biologically yes, and thats not the only advantage female has, according to the market rule of supply & demand, a single man makes million time more sperm then a single woman makes egg, so in the end even if women don't have womb, she will still be valued more than us men. More supply = less value. But women does not only benefit from biology, she also benefit from the social structure where she is in a free zone of social hierarchy thats used to be dominated by men, if the one day women totally…
/r/MensRights23/06/21 10:31 AM
1

Slave owner effected the most if the slave dies. How about the slaves? Well, if disposable asset like your table or chair breaks, aren't you the one that affected the most? Talking about objecfication.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 10:07 AM
1

I personally don't think all feminist are evil Feminists are actually a big group of different people having different ideologies Cassie Jaye is a feminist, but she makes The Red Pill movie. But the core principle of "all women's problem came from men" is absolutely evil
/r/MensRights23/06/21 03:16 AM
21

Feminism had made men in general impossible to "move first" as you wished, because of all the accusation he could receive, it will not only tarnish his reputation(which is bad enough), it has actual legal consequences. And marriage is even worse, its basically a contract that benefits the breaker. Unless this changes, traditional men will go on the decrease side of the trend, i'm afraid it will be even harder to find in the future. So yeah, just make the first move. By the way even if you do mak…
/r/MensRights23/06/21 02:43 AM
18

Tell her, if all male are dead, it will change her life 360 degree and make her thankful that she live in a world where male endure all the negative and disposable side of human society to make resources for female. The life quality for women today is the direct result of male competition. If male are all gone, than it will be female competing to fight for resources and they will become disposable just like men are. Just give you an example, China had huge population disproportion between gender…
/r/MensRights23/06/21 01:58 AM
25

Both sex are being objectfied, the difference is One is a disposable asset The other is a luxury jewelry
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:30 AM
14

Feminism is not about rights, its a scam created by the Elites to maintain its power. The scam is extremely powerful compare to all the other scam throughout the history like Theocracies, Communism, etc. I could safely say, its the most advanced scam to date, and its exponentially more difficult to fight off this one than the previous ones. Because all the other form of scam has limited human supplies, and the idea has to be taught to be effective(and this process is where it meets competition a…
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:06 AM
1

Its a gimmick, basically its impossible to create a company that sides with men's issue Why? The hypocrisy of private company's right to remove whatever they don't agree with but at the same time, private company do not have the right to not recruiting female employees(which naturally leans to feminism), this double standard was created to function this way. For example, you make a video platform company, and was intented to be for men's right, but over time you got bigger, and gain more influen…
/r/MensRights22/06/21 04:43 AM
11

Its way more toxic than reddit
/r/MensRights07/06/21 01:20 PM
19

Regarding my son. What i'm expressing is, no amount of preparation from me will prepare my son for what he will endure in the future, thats my worry. Although i have done the best i could in the past, and will always be there for him in the future. Regarding my daughter. What i'm expressing is, her life and future seems promising, a girl at her age, its to late to change her attitude, but as long as she is happy with it, i'm fine, i will also support her indefinitely.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 12:15 PM
96

The worst part is suicide shaming. Instead of fixing the problem, the society decide to shame the male in question for suicidal thought, and restrict his access to painless way to die by law, alot of material on the market for painless suicide is prohibited to access, most social media forbids the talk of suicide method including reddit. thats why the "rights to die" movement exists. Basically the goverment wants the male in misery to keep producing GDPs, by using his fear of pain. Death itself …
/r/MensRights07/06/21 11:41 AM
7

I admit, i did a poor job, but shes in high school now, there is so little i could do, i do wish i could have done better if i could reverse time
/r/MensRights07/06/21 11:13 AM
22

Yes, if i could choose which gender my baby will be, i would chose female instead of male, the currently climate is terrible place for male to live in. Back when i "procreate" i was naive and certainly not red pilled.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 09:24 AM
50

Its too late for that, the school, the teachers, the media, the social enviroment she's in have already done that. Parenting is not what it used to be anymore.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 09:08 AM
85

Truth? I fear for my son way more than my daughter. No one will be there for him except me. No one will listen to his problem but to shame him. I always felt guilty of for bringing him into this world to suffer. I love them both, but my daughter just seems less needing me, she sees me as an obstacle instead of help, there will always be different type of teenager boys listen to her complains, and compliment her every decision without question. And when that comparison happens, she sees me being …
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:13 AM
3

It was wrong to address patriachy when ignoring gynocentricism, if what certain group wishes is true equality. The so called "patriarchy" is not beneficial to the most of male population saves for the miniority population of the top class, even then to achieve certain class there comes will huge sacrifice and responsibility that most of women at the time will never choose to bear in the first place. If you force women to going to battle(in a harmful way not logisic roles like modern day military…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 03:57 AM
5

I still do believe their restriction of free choice was due to the time, any era women does not have free choice, men in general(majority of the population) have even less(or have to bear extreme price and responsibility for that freedom that women simply do not wish to bear, and this choice was never given to men, but was forced). But i do agree with your second point about who starts first, but isn't it ironic that women gets to start it first and actually successful with it was the proof of h…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 03:40 AM
1

Of course it shouldn't be, that is an injustice thing to do, thats why this movement exist.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 02:27 PM
0

I do believe there is some instance, regret having sex with someone could be end up justified as raped, society take woman lying about it seriously
/r/MensRights16/10/20 03:20 AM
2

Very detailed thought, thank you for sharing your own experience. I'm sorry both terrible things happened to you, really wish you luck.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 03:17 AM
7

If your main goal is to bash this community, go ahead, we already get used to it anyways. But if your intention is truely to learn about what this movement is about, there is alot of information you could read. like this one: https://menarehuman.com/citations/
/r/MensRights16/10/20 12:21 AM
6

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/right This sub-reddit never stated it was about legal-right only, thus i have no idea where deceptive came from. If Feminism is about equality, then MRA would never have existed in the first place.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 12:15 AM
3

Of course i agree this could happen to men, its just this word often used in the opposite way, atleast in mainstream media. And this is where it bother me the most, beside this forum, nine out of ten times, you heard this word, it about complaining men abusing women, with the last one addressing parents abusing child, men's well being was never considered, and the definition of the word became more blurry everyday.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 12:10 AM
1

You actually had my point reversed. The word abuse was suppose to be a neutral word, i do recall this term was created around the same period where the the Duluth model was created, since feminism has to be about equality on surface the word had to be gender neutral. But in reality, looking at mainstream media, the word abuse are often used against men instead of against women, this is where the definition on paper and practicality of use doesn't align. As for misandry, it suffer similar fate, i…
/r/MensRights16/10/20 12:05 AM
3

I already stated i am not talking about the law on paper, i'm talking about a phenomenon, and i asked your whether its a justice thing for a police to do, yet you haven't given a direct answer to this specific question. But lets assume that you do not agree with the police training, why do you think police were trained this way across the globe? Do you not think feminism influenced how legal action is being enforced in a bias way? And i don't think this sub-reddit is a legal forum, its a sub-red…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 11:56 PM
1

I think your replied to the wrong person
/r/MensRights15/10/20 11:46 PM
5

May i ask, what are your view on Duluth Model, and the fact that DVRO is easily abusable by female? The police is trained with bias againist male and alot of times issued DVRO without any evidence other than words? I'm not talking about laws on paper, i'm talking about this phenomenon happen frequently in our society, and what is your opinion on this? A male warranted a DVRO could be devastating to his finance, reputation, career, social relationship, do you think its justice for this to be easi…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 11:36 PM
2

I'm not trying to get any specific response, just want to see what other people's opinions are. But since you've brought up some good point, i would like to ask you and expend regarding these points. If a male cannot experience of being raped as a woman thus cannot comment on it as you've mention, does that apply to both positive and negative (which means also including the male cannot comment on if its painful for the woman)? Or should it be commented based on how the male perceive it, if the c…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 09:53 PM
1

I think more specifically: raped as a woman or falsely accused of rape as a man Which one do you think damages more? I didn't include the other two option because i believe being raped as a man does not get the same attention as being raped as woman. And accused of rape as a woman rarely happens, let alone falsely accused(or the impact on her would be significantly lower).
/r/MensRights15/10/20 09:03 PM
1

I do kinda of get one of your point, that technology does not take side, it could also be used againist the truth like how every major platform is now banning or shadow banning MRAs. I think relies totally on internet is not enough, we need local communities too, i mean alots of them
/r/MensRights12/10/20 02:55 AM
1

The very definition of mob rule
/r/MensRights11/10/20 08:41 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Den_Hollander https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Angelucci A men's right supporter kills another men's right supporter, for reason unknown
/r/MensRights11/10/20 08:28 PM
3

This case is very odd. I mean why would a Men's right supporter kill another Men's right supporter? I just don't understand the motive
/r/MensRights11/10/20 08:27 PM
1

Its mainly online voice. MRA needs to form real organization and gain political position within the system to truely make real difference. Until that, feminist are making progress everyday, for the very same reason, they basically controls the system, with massive organization to back it.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 12:02 AM
56

Looking at the truth could be depressing sometimes, but its still better than ignoring it.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 11:56 PM
4

I would also like to address something subtle in mainstream media (Including TV, Moving, Games) The males in the protagonist category always being respectful and humble to female characters, and always be the one to apologize even they have done nothing wrong, While the males in the villain category does the opposite to highlight its villainess While the females in the protagonist category mostly being rude and harsh to male character as if its some kind of cool thing to do. They are also unlike…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 11:47 PM
1

In fact, whenever someone tries to take direct action as an MRA, they're quickly disavowed by the community. It's a self-defeating ideology in many ways. By community, do you mean disavowed by MRA itself? But why?
/r/MensRights02/10/20 11:32 PM
1

The sad truth is, we presume that both woman and man are suppose to be on the same side, the only thing that segregates us are "misunderstanding", we try to reach out to feminists or woman in general to resolve the "misunderstanding", but only gets even more hostile feedback. But why? Is because man and woman are never on the same side to begin with in the entirety of human history. Just think about it, human competes for resources, people only create groups (and groups are likely being formed b…
/r/MensRights03/05/20 01:21 PM
4

There was never their version of patriarchy to begin with, its always gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 01:09 PM
1

In every field, man takes the more risky postion, thats nothing new. But when it comes to benefit and interest its always the other around.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 01:06 PM
23

Not to mention Female prison does not even come close to Male prison in terms of harshness
/r/MensRights03/05/20 01:03 PM
1

Do you mean that, if a woman makes allegation without any proof, her husband is put in cell, and he have to pay 11 month of payment? WTF
/r/MensRights29/04/20 08:25 AM
2

That mind reader part is ridiculous, thanks for your information. ​ So even from a legal perspective its not the case, but some men are still convicted for this?
/r/MensRights16/04/20 02:38 AM
2

Hello Antilopes, how are you doing. These "Signs" are over generalized and are mostly statement with little evidence. Fitting one of these signs by no mean makes an abusive relationship, there are whole lots of other reason that also shows "some" of these same signs. What i'm trying to say is that, by excessively pushing these idea soley as signs of abusive relation by the mainstream, has an impact on narrowing how people view matters, and may sometime mistakenly/suspiciously questioning an othe…
/r/MensRights20/12/19 08:04 PM
2

Ironically by their standard i guess you fall into the " Put-downs of your interests "" Yelling "" Lecturing " "Turning the tables "" Accusing you of abuse " or maybe even " Patronizing "" Public embarrassment "" Dismissiveness " " Character assassination "
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:53 AM
5

I just did some research about the term "emotional abuse", what a shock I've search the term "emotional abuse" in reddit front page, its mind blowing to see in the current culture everything is considered abusive, this idea gone so wild. Basically if you don't agree with someone you are abusive, even without saying anything, you still fall into the ignorant category. also check this https://www.reddit.com/r/emotionalabuse/ They had so many made up words like gaslighting, guilt shaming etc, its i…
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:36 AM
7

For god sake, so this is the Duluth Model everyones talking about? I've heard of it but never knew it was this level of absurdity, how could theory like this became generally accepted? Who in the right mind would allow this kind of stuff in academic field?
/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter