TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Steve77307 Archive

View 20 posts and 120 comments by Steve77307 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
193

ConversationSteve77307/r/seduction17/03/22 10:42 PM
134

GeneralSteve77307/r/MensRights07/09/24 11:57 PM
37

Outer Game Steve77307/r/seduction31/03/21 04:58 PM
34

GeneralSteve77307/r/MensRights08/02/26 02:09 AM
24

Outer Game Steve77307/r/seduction03/08/20 11:32 PM
20

Field ReportSteve77307/r/seduction23/05/21 06:14 PM
16

Fundamentals Steve77307/r/seduction16/11/24 06:37 PM
13

ConversationSteve77307/r/seduction13/07/22 06:43 PM
6

Escalation & CalibrationSteve77307/r/seduction03/08/20 11:56 PM
5

Escalation & CalibrationSteve77307/r/seduction01/12/24 09:55 PM
5

Removed: No Beginner Topics/Too BroadSteve77307/r/seduction26/02/21 05:33 AM
4

Outer Game Steve77307/r/seduction25/04/22 01:42 AM
2

Removed: Off-TopicSteve77307/r/seduction27/03/21 03:08 AM
2

Field ReportSteve77307/r/seduction02/03/21 05:31 PM
1

ConversationSteve77307/r/seduction14/11/21 03:08 AM
1

ConversationSteve77307/r/seduction04/09/20 02:55 AM
1

Inner Game Steve77307/r/seduction26/12/21 11:08 AM
1

LifestyleSteve77307/r/seduction29/11/21 10:08 PM
0

Inner Game Steve77307/r/seduction28/06/22 02:46 AM
0

Field ReportSteve77307/r/seduction06/09/20 06:58 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

The deeper you dig into these issues, the clearer it becomes that this isn’t primarily a men vs women conflict, it’s about the liberal worldview. That’s why I’ve started spending less time criticizing feminists and more time examining liberalism itself. Its core impulse is to make everyone interchangeable, and the sprawling apparatus of anti-discrimination laws is how that ideal gets enforced. The problem is that liberalism is so deeply embedded in the culture that even many “conservatives” stil…
/r/MensRights26/07/26 10:59 AM
1

I hadn't heard this take before, but there might be some truth to it. It feels natural for men to initiate, yet the amount of effort many men invest in learning 'seduction', reading emotions, tone, calibration, etc, does seem somewhat feminine in nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 12:59 AM
-6

Men are, by nature, less sexually appealing than women. So men doing sexual things often reads as unremarkable, or even gross, while women doing sexual things feels like a performance. It's why female on female makeouts are attractive to many men, while male to male ones appeals to no one, including women. It’s not an arbitrary prejudice, it’s biology. The stronger disgust toward men using sex toys likely flows from the same source. It’s not something men need to be shamed for, but understanding…
/r/MensRights06/07/26 02:42 AM
11

I wasn't trying to argue whether parts of the manosphere are good or bad. My main point was simply that trying to neatly separate the MRM from the manosphere is mostly futile. The label gets applied to almost anything that focuses on men's issues or pushes back against feminism. Whether someone is doing advocacy, self-improvement, or red pill analysis, it tends to get thrown into the same bucket.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 01:44 AM
10

MRA is inherently part of the manosphere because it directly challenges feminism and advocates for men in ways that mainstream society considers anti-feminist. The manosphere label isn’t something you can simply opt in or out of, it’s usually applied by outsiders, especially when they view the content as "problematic". That said, the manosphere isn’t monolithic. It includes corners focused on self-improvement, dating/red pill dynamics, Mens Rights, and more. For instance, MGTOW and pickup artist…
/r/MensRights03/07/26 12:31 AM
1

I think approaching women will gradually become acceptable again as wokeness fades and society continues its long, steady march back toward tradition. I also believe much of women’s current skepticism toward men stems from the loosening of sexual norms. Specifically, the normalization of sex before marriage or commitment. Once men began approaching women primarily with sex in mind, it fueled buzzwords like “creep,” “harasser,” and “consent.” In that sense, #MeToo served as a clumsy barrier to se…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 12:07 AM
27

The left is by far the most adversarial toward the men's rights movement. While the right has its own issues, it doesn't compare to the left's outright hostility. The modern left has mainstreamed MeToo style suspicion, along with "patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity" lectures that treat men as inherently problematic.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 12:38 AM
21

I can see how someone who accepts the mainstream narrative on women’s suffrage and equality would reach that conclusion. However, I’d argue the core problem isn’t just the “men vs. women” framing, it’s the liberal/progressive worldview that created that framing in the first place. Traditionalism offers a better solution because it rejects the entire premise of gender conflict and instead emphasizes complementary roles.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 09:59 AM
0

I think you're interpreting it too literally. Like prioritizing a woman's life over a man's makes the man a lesser person. That's not the point being made at all. Like I said, it goes back to the old social contract. Nobody's saying women are incapable, but men are significantly stronger. That's not an opinion, it's a fact. It's honestly one of the core dividing lines in the MRA space. More liberal leaning advocates push for equal treatment across the board. More traditional voices argue for res…
/r/MensRights31/05/26 11:00 PM
4

The original "women and children" phrase wasn't the core problem. The real issue is that men no longer receive the respect or social authority that once made that framing make sense. For most of history, men were expected to be protectors of women and children. In war, men went first. On sinking ships, men stayed behind. This was part of the social contract. Men accepted greater risk and responsibility in exchange for greater authority and status. Nowdays with the push for equality, that contrac…
/r/MensRights31/05/26 07:14 PM
16

Only surveyed feminists, no comparison to other women. Didn't report participant attractiveness. Vague "materialism" definition. Seems designed to harden body positivity positions among feminist.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 09:17 AM
1

Woke
/r/MensRights27/05/26 04:33 PM
3

you're partially right that "Men's Rights" focuses on gender specific issues in a way that resembles progressive identity politics. However, I'd argue the name itself is largely a parody and direct counter to "Women's Rights". That said, you have to acknowledge that the vast majority of the Men's Rights movement is explicitly countering modern feminism, a core left wing movement, so it's natural that much of the pushback against it comes from right leaning perspective. That being said, it does d…
/r/MensRights12/05/26 05:27 PM
3

Definitly didnt sound like a Democrat
/r/MensRights12/05/26 04:13 PM
-1

Skeptical. This feeds directly into the narrative that men can't interact with women without it being about looks. 307 students total, unclear how many were even women, let alone how many rated as attractive.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 05:35 PM
1

"Provocative" clothing isn't universally accepted. Plenty of cultures, religions, and even workplaces actively discourage or restrict it. The opinion you're probably referring to, where PUA is shamed while provocative clothing is accepted, most likely comes from certain feminist circles. But it's not a view shared across all feminists, some actually see provocative clothing as sexist or rooted in the "male gaze".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 05:31 PM
4

I struggle to believe a dating coach who teaches men how to approach and 'game' women would suddenly ignore his own advice and turn abusive. Most men aren’t flawless. If your intimate with enough women, the odds are you'll eventually misread a signal, push too far, or touch the wrong way, and suddenly you're an 'abuser' by sheer probability. Not to mention outright fabrications. That's why casual sex seems insane to me. Just stick to handling it yourself.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 09:34 PM
11

You really can’t take this stuff at face value anymore. A sizable group of women in the West carries a built in narrative that men are oppressors, predators, or even pedophiles. With that mindset, even normal or slightly awkward behavior gets read as creepy or offensive.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 03:35 AM
5

Being a man and being a modern liberal is a contradiction. You cannot align yourself with feminism and claim to be meaningfully opposing it. At some point you have to pick a side. Furthermore, If you approach men’s rights from a social justice angle, you just repackage men as another “oppressed group,” except now the villain is framed as women. That misses the point. The issue is not women. It is the broader liberal framework that defines everything through power, oppression, and identity catego…
/r/MensRights18/02/26 07:25 AM
1

Protecting people from harassment or abuse is more important than reputation This is not a settled truth. Reputation can be equal if not more damaging. Victims are harmed by specific acts, but the accused are the ones who are jailed, fired, and morally condemned by society. This is why MeToo has done more damage than whatever good it produced. It normalized treating awkward, minor, or subjective interactions as harassment. That does not protect victims. It creates unnecessary problems, breeds re…
/r/MensRights10/02/26 08:31 PM
1

Sexual harassment training has likely expanded the definition of harassment rather than reduced actual abuse. When companies repeatedly emphasize how employees might be harassed, people naturally begin to view more interactions through that frame. It is frustrating how loosely terms like “sexual harassment” and even “creep” are used. Women do not realize how much these labels can damage a man’s reputation. They should be reserved for genuinely serious offences.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 08:07 AM
1

If you are a man who is interested in a women today, the type of appropriate behaviors you can exhibit without being called creepy has rapidly dwindled to the point of simply being too risky for most men. You are right that nothing happens if you act "appropriately", but that is precisely why pickup advice has become so popular. It often takes dedicated effort to learn the ins and outs of talking to women without risking accusations.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 06:54 AM
2

It does not require sexual behavior. Even brief public interactions can lead to concequences, with intent and age awareness assumed despite neither being discussed.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 05:41 PM
1

Most men will not argue against cracking down on pedophilia because most men are not interested in kids. The concern is how easily someone can still get caught up in these situations. You may have a brief encounter with a woman who turns out to be younger than she looks, and the next thing you know you are being investigated.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 02:27 AM
-2

I don't think this case maps cleanly onto men’s rights arguments. It was a volatile mix of suspicion, racial tension, and outright criminal insanity.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 01:43 AM
2

I think movements like this operate at a level larger than the guilt or innocence of any one individual. Political theater is one thing, but laws, policies, and social attitudes are what ultimately affect everyone.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 07:02 PM
4

I’d still choose a tradwife over a feminist. One is based on natural roles rather than resentment.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 06:35 AM
7

It's true that men often do not fight back against criticism of porn, since pushing back can come across as saying they have trouble attracting women, something they prefer to avoid.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 12:49 AM
3

Agreed, I think Porn and masturbation will always be reflexively shamed unless people actually reflect on where those attitudes come from and whether they make sense. For me, the conservative arguments around modesty and avoiding lust end up fitting too closely with the feminist idea of ridiculing the male gaze.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 12:02 AM
1

I’m not familiar with the conscription issue or whether the right is actually more supportive of it. But even if that were true, conscription isn’t an everyday reality for most men. Feminist driven social policies affect men daily through law, culture, and institutions, which makes them far more consequential.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 03:46 AM

The left is largely incompatible with men. It consistently frames men as oppressors, abusers, or sexual predators. Men are told their attraction is objectifying, their instincts are toxic, and that even how women look should have nothing to do with male desire. The right, on the other hand, is not perfect either, but it is not inherently antagonistic toward men. It does not promote movements like MeToo in a way that encourages women to interpret men approaching them, or even simple compliments, …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 08:17 AM
-2

I agree false allegations are wrong, though stating that they cause harm feels self evident. What gets missed is the fixation on the word false. What exactly qualifies as a false allegation. Many accusations don't come from blatant fabrications, but from situations where there is a kernel of truth that gets interpreted negatively and then escalated. At that point it becomes less about clear facts and more about beliefs and perception. A man pulling a woman closer when she was not ready becomes h…
/r/MensRights26/12/25 05:37 AM
6

Those places are the usual environments where trouble happens.. What's concerning is women claiming to feel unsafe from a man approaching them on the street in broad daylight, or from receiving any sort of physical compliment or remark. There's even airlines offering women the option to choose seats away from men. This is the point where I believe feminism is creating chaos by framing men as something inherently threatening.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 06:11 PM
7

I cannot really speak for Marxists, but the right is clearly the most anti feminist side, even though the average conservative still accepts some feminist talking points. Many will say modern feminism has gone too far, while still accepting, to some degree, the idea that women were historically oppressed by a patriarchal system. These are typically seen as the “reasonable” conservatives: anti woke, but still aligned with dominant historical narratives, with a smaller subset on the right question…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 03:21 AM
-11

While it is understandable, I don't think that bringing up that “men get raped too” is the strongest counterpoint. The underlying drive behind rape is far more in men than in women. Doesn't make women morally better or worse, but the biological impulse simply is not the same. Combined with the fact that women are less physically strong, it is why the idea of a woman forcibly raping a man sounds implausible to people. The reason rape is frequently used as a weapon against men is not because of ba…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 08:16 PM
1

Women seem to expect men to act like women, viewing appearance as an insufficient reason to approach and not knowing whether they are remotely interested until extended interaction and full comfort are established. This is not how men are made. If women want attraction to work that way, they are effectively asking for a lesbian dynamic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 11:55 PM
1

The whole premise that women are under immense pressure to meet difficult beauty standards is largely a product of feminism, which itself is an extension of liberalism. The goal has always been to make men and women look more similar and androgynous, aligning with the broader objective of erasing sex differences. Honestly, I don’t think the “ideal female body” is nearly as extreme as it’s made out to be. It just appears more today because so many people are overweight, which makes it seem much f…
/r/MensRights17/12/25 03:29 AM
24

The premise itself is questionable, since men have historically been less social than women. The “male loneliness epidemic” often serves as a more presentable stand in for the so called “incel epidemic,” where men’s virginity is used as a way to mock their masculinity. Instead of asking “why aren’t people getting married,” the question has now become “why aren’t men having sex,” which reflects how relationships are increasingly viewed today.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 11:13 PM
1

Men definitely have it harder in that situation. But are you suggesting women should be drafted as well? A lot of people here are critical of feminist positions, yet what you’re proposing would actually align with them in practice. I don’t think pushing for more equality will fix the issues that it has already created.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 12:43 AM
2

I get where you’re coming from. Though I’d question going as far as saying “chads” are getting away with harassment. Even decent looking men can easily get accused nowadays. It seems more like women are simply more lenient toward men they find attractive.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 12:33 AM
15

The saying tries to contrast physical danger for women with social embarrassment for men, but it oversimplifies men’s side of the equation. Being “laughed at” often means facing serious reputational harm, especially if a woman characterizes a man as creepy. That kind of label can be socially terminal, leading to exclusion from groups, jobs, opportunities, etc with little chance to recover. The impact isn’t minor just because it isn’t physical.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 09:25 PM
3

Yeah, I generally agree. I get this same vibe from a lot of self-improvement and pickup/seduction communities online. They benefit from the decline of traditional relationship norms, and When you bring up the struggles men face, like being accused of being a creep, the response is often indifference, or they scold you for not being “socially calibrated.” I think it’s a mistake to assume everyone in the manosphere space is on your side or conservative. In reality, many of these guys might be the …
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:37 AM

I see your point, although it rests on a few assumptions that are debatable, for example, the idea that the right focusing on genetics or that people of color are less accepted on the right due to prejudice against non-whites. I’d also argue that men who are more successful with women face fewer barriers to leaning left. Not because progressive ideas make them more attractive, but because they’re already seeing results and therefore have fewer grievances with feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:10 AM
1

I think you’re missing some of the reasons behind cold approach. Meeting people through regular channels, like friends, work, or meetups, is ideal, but those opportunities can be limited. Social circles only extend so far, and sometimes there simply aren’t events to attend. In those cases, cold approach becomes a way to fill in the time. The alternatives you mention also come with risks. Dating within a social circle can “poison the well” if things don’t work out, leading to gossip or tension. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 02:53 AM
1

What are you waiting for, why not just join the right? I honestly can’t imagine being opposed to modern feminism yet still voting for them, why keep supporting the very people who push it? Its like staying in a destroyed house because you don’t like the neighbors. At this point, the right has far more common-sense people than the woke left.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 05:17 AM
2

"‘Red pill’ can mean a lot of different groups. What you’re describing sounds more like traditional or older folks who already disapprove of certain choices and then link them to harassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 09:18 PM
2

Those often seen as “victim blamers” are typically people who already disagree with certain choices the woman made beforehand, such as wearing revealing clothing or engaging in casual sex. When harassment or assault are alleged. they may attribute it to those choices. This perspective is more common among religious or socially conservative groups. However, it can be difficult to determine what’s actually to blame, or even what counts as harassment nowadays, since movements like feminism and #MeT…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 03:21 AM
1

The question is how we define what sexual harassment actually is. A lot of the time, women report men for things that aren't very clear-cut. For example, if a man asks for her phone number or compliments her appearance a bit more than she likes, and she feels "uncomfortable," is that really a false claim? In many workplaces, harassment is defined based on whether the behavior was "unwanted." That basically puts all the power in the hands of the accuser. If she says it made her uncomfortable, the…
/r/MensRights27/06/25 02:02 AM
1

Modern feminism actually seems like a rebranded version of older religious and traditional values. Ideas from the Bible, like the need to suppress lust and the emphasis on modesty and “inner beauty” laid the foundation for things like body positivity and the belief that male attraction towards physical appearance is inherently wrong and shallow. Ironically, I still see conservative men today shaming women for dressing “too revealing,” and in a strange way, that attitude overlaps with the feminis…
/r/MensRights21/06/25 01:19 AM
2

Autistic "acceptance" seems to stop when it clashes with feminist narratives. One common belief is that men are often sexually aggressive toward women, so autistic men are more likely to face accusations based on this view. Autistic people often behave in ways that can seem odd to others, which puts autistic men under extra scrutiny when interacting with women. This makes misunderstandings much more likely. As an autistic man, I’ve dealt with this myself . At work, I approached some women I was …
/r/MensRights20/06/25 02:57 AM
2

Well, autistic men are more likely to struggle with dating, which can naturally place them into the "incel" category. I'm on the spectrum as well, but this doesn’t really bother me, since I disagree with the whole premise of the incel label to begin with. It's also worth noting that progressives are navigating some contradictions here. On one hand, they recognize autism as an identity deserving of inclusion and respect, similar to how they approach LGBT+. But at the same time, some of those same…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 09:29 PM
1

I wasn’t arguing for or against any approach, just pointing out a reason why some men might choose to wait around for sex. Leaving shortly after sex can come with its own social consequences. On the other hand, pursuing something that looks like a long-term relationship doesn’t carry the same stigma. That’s why I called it “saving face.”
/r/seduction25/04/25 12:25 AM
1

Relax. You’re confused about what I was quoting. Here is the part I am talking about https://youtu.be/JDcb5Qg9wCw?si=Ra83yHS4lLD1pUF6&t=74
/r/MensRights22/04/25 03:50 AM
1

I think a lot of men are so used to constantly being warned about how to behave around women that it’s just expected at this point. It’s not that I disagree with the idea, it’s just that we’re reminded of it at every turn, and after a while, it gets exhausting.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 03:00 AM
-2

Women are generally a lot hotter than men. They have beauty on their side. Not sure if that would count in their eyes though. They’d probably just call it "objectification."
/r/MensRights22/04/25 01:09 AM
1

I honestly don’t think the women were doing anything wrong here. If anything, it came across as a positive message. They’re actually implying that approaching women at the gym isn’t off-limits, which is a good thing to hear. Ironically, I felt the guy’s reaction was a bit overly critical of men. When he's like, "you respect their decision and leave them alone." it almost sounds like he doesn’t even trust guys to behave properly around women.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 11:56 PM
2

some men simply don’t have that many options. Sticking around can help save face, especially if you’re religious.
/r/seduction21/04/25 04:50 AM
1

You’re not crazy for having that fear. I practice cold approach myself and have had my fair share of uncomfortable situations and accusations. That said, it’s important to keep some perspective on what typically happens. In most cases, the consequences you might face won’t come from the legal system. You’re more likely to deal with things "outside of court" like getting fired, expelled from school, or banned from a venue (gym, club, coffee shop, etc.). Getting criminally charged is much rarer an…
/r/MensRights20/04/25 08:11 AM
1

I think women focus too much on seeming easy/hard instead of focusing on the real goal, which is usually finding a serious relationship. As far as withholding sex before commitment, there are different schools of thought. Some say to have sex early and see if they stick around. If they don’t, you know their intentions. Others say to withhold sex until marriage, and if they stick around, then they’re serious. Although honestly, there are plenty of men who would be willing to stick around for awhi…
/r/seduction20/04/25 04:02 AM
4

People usually advise against it out of caution because of today’s social climate. The prevailing narrative is that men are always "leering" at women, and to some people, especially those who are more feminist-minded, that’s inherently wrong. The gym environment amplifies this idea, since many workouts can unintentionally put women in positions that are seen as erotic. Those who discourage approaching women in certain settings often either subscribe to this view, or they’re simply being extra ca…
/r/seduction02/04/25 11:11 PM
3

I've come to realize that many of the issues we face in dating are largely the result of broader societal shifts. It’s not so much about the innate behavior of women, but rather how societal changes have shaped the way we all perceive things. A significant part of this is the rise of "wokeness," but more broadly, it's the influence of liberalism and the attitudes that have come with it. Recognizing this can help shift some of the frustration away from women. A lot of guys don’t seem to realize t…
/r/MensRights29/03/25 05:49 AM
1

You actually brought up the scenario I acknowledged as plausible, the case where a man in a position of authority is involved. However, my point is that it’s much easier for a company to justify firing someone based on an accusation rather than firing someone who reported harassment. Even if the accusation turns out to be frivolous, the company can claim they acted out of caution. On the other hand, firing someone for reporting harassment is less straightforward and exposes the company to seriou…
/r/MensRights29/03/25 02:38 AM
3

I'm really curious about your experience cold approaching in a "Muslim country." From what I understand, women are rarely out in public to begin with, and I can't imagine feminist movements like #MeToo being a major factor in discouraging approaches there. Is there some kind of other social pressure against it? That aside, a lot of guys say the same thing: I’ve done everything, but I’m still single. It’s completely understandable, especially when you’re constantly seeing other people in relation…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/25 08:01 PM
1

I doubt a boy that young would even be interested in girls, let alone looking up advice on how to attract them online. That said, a film exploring the manosphere could be interesting, but I have yet to see one that truly does justice to its themes. The ideal writer for such a film would likely be someone immersed in the manosphere themselves, rather than a Hollywood insider who would inevitably filter it through a feminist lens.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/25 10:40 PM
1

A lot of the issues surrounding topics like these are just reflections of the broader conservative vs. liberal debate. In this case, MGTOW or related groups (e.g., redpill, manosphere) often represent the conservative side, while 4B aligns more with feminist/liberal perspectives. Reactions—such as name-calling or accusations of prejudice—tend to come more frequently from the liberal side.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/24 10:59 AM
1

I can see why you may not want to approach women around others you’ve already approached for attraction reasons. As for "other people" watching, I think it’s only worth worrying about their opinions if they have some sort of authority, like venue staff or university officials. Beyond those practical concerns, I wouldn’t stress too much about the judgments of people who are weary of men simply approaching women. Some may hold negative views about men’s intentions and buy into certain "creep" narr…
/r/seduction13/12/24 01:21 AM
24

"I was just hoping you’d consider adopting me."
/r/seduction08/12/24 10:30 PM
2

I think it’s true that there are often more men than women at clubs, but a 1:9 ratio seems pretty extreme. Are you sure you’re taking everyone into account, such as older or less attractive women? Sometimes, our perception can be influenced by what we’re specifically focusing on. It’s also interesting how there are conflicting narratives about this in the manosphere space. for example
/r/seduction08/12/24 09:37 PM
1

Giving a bit of a different take here. Are you sure what you’re feeling is obsessiveness? Or could it just be normal attraction and excitement when dating? From what you’ve shared, going on dates, seeing multiple girls, and even having sex with them, it actually sounds like you’ve got a good level of abundance already, which doesn’t typically line up with "neediness." Instead, maybe shift your focus to flipping the dynamic. How can you make the girls more obsessed with you
/r/seduction07/12/24 08:51 PM
10

I recommend checking out Todd V Dating. His analytical approach to social interactions might be particularly helpful for people on the spectrum.
/r/seduction07/12/24 08:09 PM
1

Did you respond to the right comment?
/r/seduction05/12/24 06:22 PM
1

Yeah that's unfortunate. Society often has a negative view of men "hitting on" women, largely due to the rise of hookup culture and the influence of feminism, which has led to labeling certain behaviors as creepy. But that's a discussion for another time.
/r/seduction04/12/24 01:55 AM
2

From my perspective, it doesn't seem like many women, or even men, for that matter, go to bars with the intention of meeting singles. Most people seem to be in groups, focused on their own conversations, and not actively looking to connect with strangers. I often feel like I'm the only one there with the goal of meeting women. I'm sure some women do go to bars for that reason, but it’s probably a small minority. Women also tend to be alot more passive when it comes to dating, and showing up at a…
/r/seduction04/12/24 01:36 AM
1

It likely depends on what you mean by "blowout." If they’re asking you to leave just because girls are rejecting you quickly, it seems like they’re essentially penalizing you for not being successful enough in your approach, which I hope isn’t actually a thing.
/r/seduction04/12/24 01:09 AM
5

It's not really that I feel ashamed, but more about how others might view it. I've had a few unfortunate experiences in the past that have made me more cautious about how I approach things.
/r/seduction01/12/24 10:49 PM
1

I don’t think this can be pinned on a single factor, like Trump or what CNN says. It’s part of a broader cultural shift that’s been unfolding for quite some time. It’s fascinating how unlikely alliances have formed. Who would have thought pickup artists and Christian traditionalists would ever find themselves on the same side? Yet here we are. It seems that liberal men in the Manosphere space get the most frustrated when the movement is labeled as right-wing. Perhaps it’s because they’re not qui…
/r/TheRedPill14/11/24 04:19 AM
1

At my last job, the training included a couple scenarios where men were the victims of sexual harassment by women. It was a bit surprising and, honestly, kind of amusing. They probably added those examples after receiving feedback from people with concerns similar to yours.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 09:02 AM
3

Physical compliments have the chance of offending women, especially with the feminist influenced women of today. You probably know this as well since your posting about it, basically asking whether its worth the risk to compliment them in such a way. It's generally advised not to compliment a women's appearance, unless you know what your doing, or you know her well enough. There are some instances when a physical compliment is one of the only options. For example when your doing cold approach an…
/r/seduction25/03/24 05:11 AM
0

Yeah I'm of the same thought. I think the ONS thing drives a lot of conflict between the genders. It doesn't seem to be worth it given all of the complications. Goes against social norms and instincts across the board, especially for women. People of all ages, genders, and cultures seem to not to be in favor of one night stands. Most people will usually say something like "its not for me" or "its fine if other people do it". This tendency is strongly baked into women no matter how much culture o…
/r/seduction28/08/23 09:19 PM
1

So sounds like you've got your fitness in check, which is good. How many new women do you interact with per week? Do you have many friends? Just being fit isn't really enough. You gotta be in the right situations where the opportunity will rise. Even an attractive women would have a difficult time meeting anyone if all she did was go to work, then straight home everyday. Also, the old womens an idiot.
/r/seduction07/09/22 12:41 AM
1

What have you tried? Maybe the reason is not because you can't attract women.
/r/seduction06/09/22 05:41 AM
1

Don't care what people think soo much.. It's going to ruin your game. I would suggest looking up pickup coaches on youtube. You will probably get more from them. The advice on Reddit is more of life drainer I've found.
/r/seduction09/08/22 01:35 AM
0

Or this onehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-ouy01Ga0w
/r/seduction29/07/22 02:36 AM
0

I'm not encouraging groping. They might say yes when asked, but its not the same. I think your too afraid of getting in trouble like most guys. At some point you've gotta cross the physical barrier. Here's some videos about ithttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OSFWxLAUx4
/r/seduction29/07/22 02:19 AM
1

I was talking about flirting, it sort of kills the vibe if you ask before touching.
/r/seduction28/07/22 08:32 AM
0

That can be a little awkward.. Touch them in safe areas first, like the shoulders, hair, etc.
/r/seduction28/07/22 06:11 AM
1

I worked at a tesla gigafactory for a short period. There was alot of attractive girls going in and out of the lunchroom, most of them I would never work with. I did some game during my break. Fun times. I only worked there for a short period (3 months). Eventually I might have gotten in trouble, but it was a very big work environment. Everything in life is going to come with risk. It was only a crappy temp job so it wasn't a huge deal if I was fired. If it was a career job, I might have been mo…
/r/seduction27/07/22 12:33 AM
2

I don't think you have to worry about it. Maybe talk to her for 3-6 sessions, then ask her out to coffee. An idea.. Since your both actors, there might be a chance to flirt in a unique way. If possible, try doing a short play with you and her acting as a couple or in a flirty scene. It may build discreet sexual tension. Then when your not acting, refer to her as the character she played in a teasing manor. The idea being maybe it's not just an act after all! If you don't get a chance to act with…
/r/seduction24/07/22 07:37 AM
9

I think it's generally seen as a power move that can be viewed as aggression. Men are heavily warned by society not to be too pushy or too aggressive with women. It's a natural viewpoint to have, but It's been fostered by the metoo movement and sensationalism on the news.
/r/seduction23/07/22 06:15 AM
0

What does "on read" mean?
/r/seduction29/06/22 06:09 AM
2

I feel you. Have faith my friend, don't give up. I wish you the best!
/r/seduction29/06/22 03:23 AM
17

Cold approaching is definitely not the best way to meet women. Your complete strangers that don't know each other at all and you have to rely on your charm and wits in order to get things started. So why should you do I it? The question was just "how to meet women". You didn't mention whether they are pretty or not, their race, age, marriage status, etc. If none of this mattered, then cold approach doesn't make a whole lot of sense. You could just join a club or something and meet women without …
/r/seduction29/06/22 03:13 AM
1

Doing less approaches because of unideal eye contact/circumstances may increase your "success rate" but it doesn't increase your actual amount of success. Scenario 1: you approach 30 out of 30 girls, and managed to get 5 numbers. Scenario 2: You approach 20 out of 30 girls, because the other 10 did not have sufficient eye contact first. Those 10 might have been less likely to number close, but they still might have. You can probably see how doing less approaches doesn't increase the amount of nu…
/r/seduction29/06/22 02:42 AM
1

terrible advice
/r/seduction28/06/22 10:36 PM
1

It's not always possible to get eye contact first, so I wouldn't call it off just because of that. When I cant get eye contact, I start by saying "excuse me" to get her attention. Its a soft way to start things up.
/r/seduction28/06/22 09:54 PM
7

Nice comment. Alot of the other comments on here are not serious or discouraging day game at the grocery store.
/r/seduction28/06/22 09:45 PM
1

This is good advice here. Don't know why people downvoting it soo much.
/r/seduction02/01/22 03:14 AM
3

I have not been on many dates. But the one I did go on was from a girl from work. I did not spend a whole lot of time with her prior either. I just talked to her for a couple brief moments because I was somewhat interested, later on she found me on facebook and we start messaging. Girls rarely take that sort of action though, especially early on. I might have caught her at the right time when she was looking for a date. I definitely chose jobs though based on pussy count. I usually aimed for lar…
/r/seduction16/09/21 06:54 AM
1

I'll do what I want.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/21 10:39 PM
1

I have no experience with elder women either. Or other guys. I don't think it's fair to require someone to try it out before they can say they aren't interested.
/r/seduction26/05/21 04:46 AM
1

I have an age preference for women so I see the world with a limited mineset? I Don't think you know me enough to make such a claim.
/r/seduction26/05/21 04:29 AM
1

I don't need more information, its just the fact that they are almost a decade younger. Kind of like how you don't need to date a 60 year old women in order to know that you don't want them.
/r/seduction25/05/21 12:32 AM
2

Its not a power its a preference, and everyone has their own preferences. You have an age bracket to, its just larger than mine, but its still there. How large does this bracket go? It must end somewhere, or you'll have grandmas with young men or dads dating his daughters friend from highschool.
/r/seduction24/05/21 03:22 AM
1

The thing is if I'm willing to date someone 10 years younger than me, than I feel like I should be ok with dating someone 10 years older, which I'm not..
/r/seduction24/05/21 01:53 AM
2

Honestly the very idea of changing your mindset to "not go after women" is set on the premise of finding a women. It all loops back around.
/r/seduction02/05/21 04:05 PM
1

I think not being honest with ourselves and what our intentions are is.
/r/seduction02/05/21 03:55 PM
7

I disagree on the mindset thing. Much of what men do is to ultimately meet women. They could be doing it for some benefits along the way like making friends and what not, but deep down it will always be women, and I think we should accept that. Its fine to have any mindset you want, as long as you behave like your not really there to only meet women.
/r/seduction02/05/21 05:51 AM
3

Kind of a desperate undertone in your advice. We don't know his circumstances. Its not impossible to find someone at this age you just need to try especially hard to get what you want.
/r/seduction31/03/21 07:01 PM
12

stalk the playground lol
/r/seduction31/03/21 06:54 PM
1

Its harder to tell how old people are too. Sometimes they could be 15 other times their 40.
/r/seduction27/03/21 10:39 AM
1

fixed
/r/seduction26/03/21 02:28 AM
1

Why was the post removed?
/r/seduction26/03/21 02:22 AM
1

Sorry if the formatting is off I think I made your quote really big.
/r/seduction24/03/21 07:27 PM
1

You got most things about me right. But I'm extroverted when I'm with friends and introverted when I'm at school or with other people that I don't really know. Looks like your in a click. I get upset at those kind of people who act all quiet with me, and then turn around and talk and laugh with their friends. It makes people feel excluded. Try to be more inclusive. Get used to talking with strangers. This will also help with meeting girls. Usually the ones you want the most are not in your immed…
/r/seduction24/03/21 07:24 PM
3

I think telling yourself they don't owe you anything is kind of the opposite of what you want. That saying is meant to knock peoples ego down who expect things from others too much. Your trying to build yours up. Some of the mental dating advice you hear about is good, others not so. Think about how it really applies to yourself and your circumstance. There's nothing wrong with being attracted to girls quickly. Its called a crush. It doesn't mean your low value or some nonsense. And if a girl yo…
/r/seduction23/03/21 02:11 AM
2

I'm surprised at the similarities. You remind me alot of myself when I was a sophomore in HS (I'm 29 now). I also have a form of OCD. I'm going to presume your also the introverted techie type who is very smart but lacking in the social skills (you say you sell apps). There was a girl in my biology class I had a crush on, but had a hell of a time getting myself to talk to. I would write long pages in my Journal about how disappointed I was in myself. I think people with OCD are naturally critica…
/r/seduction22/03/21 11:30 PM
1

That's what I was saying. I think this happens to alot of newbies and shy people. See girl, approach them, but not say anything immediately.
/r/seduction04/03/21 02:31 AM
1

I put some thoughts out there that might be of use to others and get dogpiled. Whatever I'm going out there again you guys can go back to fapping.
/r/seduction03/03/21 11:25 PM
1

I don't think women really care about the attractiveness level of the girl you are with. More so the fact that your with a girl. They know that you've been screened by at least one female.
/r/seduction17/11/20 07:27 AM
1

I think there's too many women with kids. Going after the single ones with no kids is narrowing your options alot, especially if you want them be a 7 or above in terms of looks.
/r/seduction04/09/20 04:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter